alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Livestock Shelter Structure (Code 576) 

A permanent or portable structure to protect animals from

negative environmental factors. 

Practice Information 

A shelter structure is installed to protect livestock from

negative environmental factors, such as excessive heat,

wind, snow, or cold. This practice can improve the

distribution of grazing animals to enhance wildlife habitat,

reduce over-used areas, or correct other resource concerns

resulting from improper animal distribution. Shelter structures are designed to address snowdrift, as

shown in the photo above, or for high heat or over-used areas using mobile structures with light

reduction shade cloth, depending on the negative environmental factors. 

The design for shade structure will be based on livestock type and size, location, and shade cover

type. Wind shelter structures can be of different shapes and sizes depending on the livestock type

and zone to be protected. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Livestock Shelter Structure (Code 572) is commonly

applied with CPSs such as Prescribed Grazing (Code 528), Fence (Code 382). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
• : .44

i4
:151/0arit. •

t• • :s:

i..n:":;1

-,;‘,.4

•••• •••:, •!. • •

-74 .• ?' t

tirrmixr . ;

,.....• „

:. -. t. --....,,...,1^7.',..,-- ;---• " • : . . • .,,.....---,v4,2•':- ... -1... 4.4-.,....:!.,..4f.,:,.•

k...,.........,... ..,-...}..;4.ki!,,,,..,,.,...;:-.;....,.....-:..i.!„.:...-,....m-i.‘, .. .A..7....:....: .- '''[..-..:...•;.'•'';

. . i,...- .:.:

, .• ...,, .t • .... • .

Alkotfitasetiaa" .

-.c.'• ,.'rj.t,:.k., .4,.-.:. ,:::: .

7-:.• ..,- • • . .5.:,,•: . -..,.• k • .: • ..,, ,i. ,,,,,,• iv.. • :. . .. ...

" - .:1-VA 2,1.: ‘1,....-...h ..;,,. , ' 4.„ t : ..-1.::,•.:- *: ' • -

....1.'".....,....,',.....,;.ii`...,..1:,,,,.....-

.... • .

... :: :.,.: :.1.',. :; ...::..-.'., .., ' :::..,. .:;:..:.: :.:N. :...'. :: :....:11:..,... . :,...:......::':::...........::::,:d..--,..:.' :.. '; . :....'...: :.. ;::: :.....,, :4.:' 4. .ira4'.A:1;.•:i..1:

alltiallearfter

N • , • . •

• . .

L4 •

.

g

•••

. • .

•. •

4. ‘ ! , •

'';•

Ti

7.
44" toe!.

!V.".

-;41:14.4

.• :6.

• •?- . "..• •

-o."'t

••

.

: „

•

:.

•

4.. 04..

-411114

"

•
•

of

Vi

•t4.•e•$ ..t A . • • ;

i'i•ki".*-i..70?. • • 4..A.1.4

I

1!.

.3'71

, f••7!..;

t'61,E,Lig :.,•••••• • ,

11.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-3894

_____________________________

ANDREW A. CAVE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell Healey, Judge.

May 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Rick A. Sichta and Susanne K. Sichta of the Sichta Firm, 

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
••

"

3. rr..1 - I )".S2:.

r. -1

5.. 1117-2

6. E34

I .-

1-1".1tr'

• ;L.

PaSi".n•44/r•("'"'j""41..../ A.11:.:)3. s't #

e.r...T.o. no Etif9..t1 6 3

Col Martiansw/22 May 63

Functions: CIA 10"..-- •

Funcpons:113)-NRO

PrOciarement..

•

SAFSS

1963 WU 24 15— 3.4

WI,j6;:t

V.:17.MIL4IMM.I. Mit no :De Director, Nno

N.SO tto cZ CIA C=.trzatt.4-1.Authorit7

Az a =tar ol ccaaral 1:01.1cy, I conatier thzro oro throe

rarzprt =a c? c...-ezfractirz out7=117 for

e:Vor tact= atterV= Cr= for vrach tr.:ha:cal

b azzizrad to thoUractor, NE0 Prop= B.

I:car =az are:

a. To pro72.(25 cr.=tial aecmity to IMO =Um= which

can. az: be gro-z3d.7.3 ctherve,-;3.

r,a

b. To prrJ.,do rer3=ze not o.Valbr...a bb threnz.b

ct re"!..r-o cc.-gactrt by utilization o2 ml...etlim

C0.7-trr-ttl Lit coo= cf arerrldizz u..-7..ncy (such an emor=acy rams cto.).

..2•of c. To c:...tatz aavia51 to the onrornzned, or

Vt2t1Z.Z azt:zor.7.7 b jot:: C.,.. przturimm=t. actions In =wort

u M. 

ea

-

n•

c-4 r

•

• 

"

1•0u,,,.." Ina-Ar4

...•n ..-r" p...

- • mak

/••• • j • •

17•. CMce

.. 1 ..•.s., .:a a ::::4:12

r..........01 Cver.r, n •' 4• ; • 1,.! • • la" ,„I

.7 ...Z4:J . :a DOLZ Z07 .z...??1,7 •- •••

, 1 • ' • . • '

._._ ...

..

••••

•• •
# CA2004150EN.01000201.xml

| 5.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 150/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 150/2

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/A/22/04 and EPSO/A/23/04 — Heads of Unit (A5/A4-A*9) and Heads of Unit (A3-A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovakian citizenship in the following fields: information, press and public relations

(Official Journal of the European Union C 104 A of 30 April 2004)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 104 A of 30 April 2004)

(2004/C 150 A/02)

On page 46, under heading C, footnote (6):

for:

‘No later than 12 noon, Brussels time, on 1 June 2004.’,

read:

‘No later than 12 noon, Brussels time, on 3 June 2004.’;

and the last paragraph:

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 1 June 2004. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’,

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 3 June 2004. On-line registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’

---
#### Estate of Steinhorst: Steinhorst and others, Appellants, vs. Gilmore, Respondent.

For the appellants: *C. A. Markham*of Beaver Dam-and *Wm. H. Markham*of Horicon.

For the respondent: *T. L. Doyle*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7177

MICHAEL A. GADDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD REEP,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00045-FDW)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 9, 2017

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Gaddy seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Gaddy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEPARTIIIE* OF . AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

IIEMORANDI 1M

aft? lelcoar4*%.3/40

41- elk, •Pde-e.c.cd-;41)

A414-44 ZXNe01".

APT

'

ear tge

4g4dt ne•fd`a•Re--

/46 #14& Ag4444egidt

4041/400g,e,Otte

11.046, AlaiggjecAeo .24,4ter

144. '.41n01 /1/4

-reictt Yeidge.

.ge."-sglL

eid-uediL"

..t:•411444WE,

.-evaRA7

- 

• t'ry
sen••••!'.'•

DEPARTMENT OF . AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

. -

MEMORANDUM

4A‘e- apA4.17fltalt

If* -444e.e. 41111.

=;' iZ40 4•4A1leigrr

Lai

r.

v•

L.

•
••••nn•••••••‘•

DEPARTMENT OF. F. AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

MEMORANDEM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FILED ON MARCH ___, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,840                   9,190
<SECURITIES>                                    11,651                  11,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,191                   6,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,269                   2,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,252                  31,274
<PP&E>                                          24,925                  18,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,167)                 (8,260)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,625                  42,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,013                   4,898
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            92                      92
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,800                  37,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,625                  42,658
<SALES>                                         59,943                  47,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                           35,032                  25,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,337                   9,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (879)                   (291)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,059                  13,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,589                   2,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,470                  11,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,470                  11,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92                    1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91                    1.06


</TABLE>
( 

# I**~** Sallijo Freeman, Plaintiff,
v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUL 1 22011 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts forthe District of Columbia


# 11 

# 1259

This matter is before the Court on review ofplaintiffs application for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") or a preliminary injunction ("PI"), which is accompanied by her complaint and application for leave to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant the in formapauperis application, deny the TRO/PI motion, and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements ofRule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires complaints to contain ''(1) a short and plain statement ofthe grounds for the court'sjurisdiction [and] (2) a short and plain statement ofthe claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief" Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); seeAshcroftv. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice ofthe claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate-------- ------------- -------------

defense and determine whetherthe doctrine ofresjudicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District ofColumbiaresident, sues Wal-Mart Stores. She lists her allegations
as "Violation ofthe American with Disabilities Act" and "Breach ofAgreement," CompI. at L but she has stated no supporting facts and, thus, has failed to provide any notice ofa claim. Plaintiffseeks permission to file an amended complaint, but she does not explain why she submitted a wholly deficient complaint in the first place. Furthermore, plaintiffstates no basis for issuing a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction "to enjoin the defendant from the destruction ofdocuments pertaining to" what appears to be her employment application. TRO Mot. at 1. Hence, the Court will dismiss the instant action without prejudice to plaintiff refiling a complaint that complies with Rule 8. A**sep'~~ate** Order**~f dismi-ssal~ompanies**  this
I - I ) Memorandum Opinion.

Date: July

# Ji-, 2011 / 

## /**~** " / 

# / ,- '-Of**/~** \ United States Distric Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, April 06, 2015, 11:00 a.m. 
to April 06, 2015, 1:00 p.m., National Institute on Aging, Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2015, 80 FR 7003.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the date of the meeting 
from April 6, 2015 to March 30, 2015. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03091 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE COMPANY'S
GENERAL LEDGER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                    18,125
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    18,273
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               74,291
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                  530,796
<ALLOWANCE>                               (2,224)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           484,828
<DEPOSITS>                               341,191
<SHORT-TERM>                              38,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       51,911
<LONG-TERM>                               26,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   5,910
<OTHER-SE>                                21,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           484,828
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           14,792
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          2,454
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              13
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          17,259
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         6,329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         8,844
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      8,415
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                828
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            28
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            9,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,488
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   967
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 967
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                1,267
<LOANS-PAST>                                 130
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            2,850
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           2,323
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              1,138
<RECOVERIES>                                 113
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          2,166
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       2,166
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00290-CV

IN RE OUTREACH HEALTH CARE, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 7, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 28, 2014, relator Outreach Health Care, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

and a motion for temporary relief. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and 

is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ 

of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-20411, styled Ruben Vasquez, Individually and as Administrator 

of the Estate of Ruben Vasquez Jr., Deceased and Oralia Vasquez, Joe Jimenez and Rosa Ward v. San Antonio 

Extended Medical Care, Inc. d/b/a MedMart, et al., pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 

the Honorable John D. Gabriel Jr. and the Honorable Barbara Nellermoe, presiding.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11
                                       
                        Service Systems International, Ltd.
                         Computation of Per-Share Income
                              Treasury Stock Method
                            As Modified for 20% Test


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Year Ended August 31, 1998
                                                      --------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                 9,160,048
                                                            -----------
Total common and common equivalent shares                    12,662,988
                                                            -----------
                                                            -----------
Net income (loss) for the period                            $(1,285,556)
                                                            -----------
                                                            -----------

Total common and common equivalent shares                    12,662,988
                                                            -----------
                                                            -----------

Loss per common and common equivalent shares                $     (0.14)
                                                            -----------
                                                            -----------

</TABLE>


Earnings per share:

The earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the 
period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the 
period. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation if their 
effect would be anti-dilutive.
ING

2

•

viviNsE RksE,i,VutIAT.Loti DIRE. _" AND ENGINEI

WASHINGTON 25. D.C.

JUL 2.1

S P Rriwits i

moo

7.1

.. . .. — - ----e---- H

1:* 7 . •- ------;•- i:!‘: 7 . . ! —1 A • • : t • -. . -

i

.

T''''...' ' . jaieRA/DANSCR-16411CRDIARY 4 or ssal. AIR FORCE .,: . .,.

iy

.., _ .,.. _........ .........._.. ) I

t t, • . .

---60MOTs---Additiona3. arLsc/AGENA Launch Fac -

I n C 6 • ' t • I •

With retertnce_44 the .revised SAMCS :Development Plan:

:

:

C';..14 which vas presemited ko °1$S .16 and 19 .10 . 1960, •

• Yeiluestrthott the MForce.1Vocee4.11Nagiotte3,v_with _the _ ... 

?

:. n,-.!1,. C-...A,Siiiin And aonstructton of-a_ 121( it, blockhouse'' .indlihree-43)- . ---- -i

1 f :,,.:1__,, ,- ire ; • -, oR ..:,-;,--1*.tro ! 4 „

_ _ _ _launch 4ads for. DEA/VAusivorehicles:- This-010182-1b-t5-

, •

' _ 4 • ' •

-, (7 A.Fizrr

. :1

•

..,..._......:..........--._be-adjaccent-to-Cripirc,:l at Point Arguellp. ' It is under- i

I i

4

:...-- --f-- tood., -that-the-construAtion funds Artsurrenta,t ayailana . ...•. _ ._..............i

7 :

i

: i I

,

. • t---

... 

1si Lar.iw.rt :b....".

Herbert F. York,

•

urn ,,r,..unaitsair.4stiornzvvr ,15.1:4:311t.t...Z.1! WY:4 r•SVA • • ..tos41.1 ,. t...44- 4,'

Te• r:

I..: • '

. -

• • • •••:i.'••• • 60-2532...

-

1

•

nt: •,," . .

--•;6,• : ••• •• -

•
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112428 

;,>~ :-~?~ ::.; ;; · :: ;,~.,. ~ ~ 

( 1111111111111111111111 

February 17, 1969 

FOR GENERA 

Several months ago, General Smart invited us to lunch and, 

amidst the opulence of the Army-Navy Club, told us about four 

problems I think we've done our part to help him solve. 

1. Can you ge ~----~in DDR&E to reply, even if it is 

negative, to my suggestion regarding the need for an oceanographic coordinating group? 

Action: ~----~did reply; reply was negative. Turned 

out a coordinating mechanism already existed. 

2. Can you support us with ~---~ flights under 

APOLLO 9? 

Action: Myron Krueger and ~----~ are working this out. 

It may cost us $5 or $6, 000. 

3. Can you take the initiative to recommend that Jaffe aircrafttest his RCA vidicon prior to committing it to satellite flight? 

Action: You have seen the LMSC proposal to Jaffe. 

4. Is it all right with you if Myron Krueger becomes Executive 

Secretary of SACC! 

Action: We agreed to this immediately. There has been no 

NASA action, so far. 

✓ In short, ~u are occupying the high ground, vis-a-vis General 

Smart. - - - -

PAU 

Colonel, 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112428 

l11111111111111111