Glen-Gery Corporation Technical Services I Research 433 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, PA 19555 (61 0) 562-3076 Fax: (610) 562-2084 http://www

.glengerybrick.com 

### January 7, 2011 CERTIFIED MAILNO.
__**_..!..7~0~10~1~0~60~0~0~0~1.::.2~57.!_!,0~5~6~94.!...._**

### __ _ Mr. Jeffrey Telander U
.S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SectorPolicies and Programs Division Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards 109T.W
. Alexander Drive ResearchTriangle Park, NC 27711 RE: Glen-Gery Corporation

- HanleyPlant Summerville, PA- Jefferson County Requirement to provide information according toTitle 42 ofthe United States Code, Chapter 85, Subchapter I, Part A, section 7414 (42 U.S
.C 7414) Dear Mr. Telander: The Glen-Gery Corporation received a letterfrom your office dated November 17, 20I

### 0
.The purpose of the letter was to inform the Glen-Gery Corporation that the U
.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was requesting the following information be submitted by February 28, 20II: 

### • Startup and shutdown events atall brick and structural clay product manufacturing facilities as described in yourenclosure I. 

### • Emissions ofhydrogen fluoride, hydrochloric acid, chlorine, metals, andparticulate matter from the facility tunnel kiln (SID-113). The Glen-Gery Corporation, Summerville, PA plant installed a wet scrubbing control device in 2003 at a significant cost due to the construction ofits newly constructed facility tunnel kiln (SID-113)
. At that time, the state ofPA used the draft Brick MACT as its basis for requiring a wet scrubber to control emissions. Since its installation in 2003 stack testing was conducted in April 2005 to prove compliance as well as in June 2008 as a condition ofits PA State Title V Operating Permit renewal. TheJune 2008 testing event was conducted shortly after theUSEPA's 2008 data gathering initiative for the new brickMACT. We believe the data from this test eventhas not yet been submitted to the USEP A. 

### Therefore, included for your review is the stack testing report from theJune 2008 testing event. Please note that the kiln operated within its allowable maximum rates during this testing event. Due to the extreme economic situation the exiting market conditions have placed on theentir e brick manufacturing industry, Glen-Gery respectfully requeststhe USEPA allow the enclosedJune 2008 stack testing data to qualify for meeting the majority oftherequirements ofthe 2010ICR. We are fully aware that the June 2008 test results do not include metals, orchlorine, but hope that the hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and particulate matter data will sufficiently meet the requested stack test data requirements as outlined in yourNovember 17, 2010 request. Theexisting marketconditions have prompted production curtailments which have not allowed the Summerville PA plant to operate at or near its maximum rated capacity over the last year. As ofmid-

### December 2010, the Summerville, PA plant has been temporarily shut down due to the existing market conditions. The plant remains in a "down" state and the restartda te i s currently unknown but is expected to be sometime in spring 2011. In addition, the Glen-Gery Corporation's, Summerville, PA plant is categorized as a synthetic minorsour ce for HAP'sand will not be subject to the upcoming new Brick MACT standards. It 

### is Glen-Gery's int ent to cooperate fully with the USEPA'srequest and is willing to assist the EPA in all its efforts to gather the information it needs. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, Glen-Gery will submit the inf ormation request on start-ups and shutdowns by the February 28, 2011 deadline and respectfully requests tha t the agency allow the enclosed 2008 test report to fulfill the requirements ofthe 2010 ICR stack testing data r equest. Please contact m e at (610) 562-3076 orMike
.Krzyzanowski @oldcastleapg.com ifyou require any other information regarding this testing exemption request.
oration

CC: SteveMatsick George Robinson

# Compliance StackEmission Test Report Determination ofTotal Filterable Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, SulfurDioxide,

Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible Emissions Ceric Kiln EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A Glen-Gery Corporation -HanleyPlant Summerville, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 Job Number: 080609

Prepared by: 

# Air Compliance Testing, Inc. PO Box41156 Cleveland OH 44141·0156 Phone: {800) EPA·A!R1 (372·2471)

Report Date: July 31,2008

### Superior Quality Emission Testing. Valid Results Guaranteed.

Mike Krzyzanowski Environmental Manager Glen-Gery Corporation- Hanley Plant 423 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 Dear Mike: 

# AirCompliance Testing, Inc. P.O. Box41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 1-800-EPA-A/Rt 

### www.aircomp.com testing@aircomp.com 

### July 31, 2008

The following report provides the results ofthe compliance emission testing conducted on June 24 and 25,2008. These results are a product ofthe application ofthe U.S. EPA Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFRPart 60 Appendix A that were in effect at the time ofthis test. Please mail one copy ofthis report along with any other supportive process operating data collected during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover Jetter (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome ofthis test. Additionally, you may address, preferably in a timetable format, any obligations or implications that might be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because ofthe result ofthis test. Please do not hesitate to call ifyou have any questions or concerns about these test results. On behalfofAir Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work with you again on any additional future testing projects. Sincerely,



# v·vUJPhaneendra Uppalapati Air Quality EngineerCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

## Table ofContents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 

### Summary ofTest Program 2 1.2 Key Personnel 2 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3 2.3 Presentation ofResults 4 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS !5 3.I Process Description and Operation 15 3.2 Control Equipment Description 15 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations !5 3.4 Process Sampling Location !6 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 20 4.1 Test Methods 20 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 22 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 27 5.I QA Audits 27 5.2 QA/QC Problems 28 6.0 APPENDIX 40

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Summary ofTest Program Glen-gery Corporation -HanleyPlant, located in Summerville, Pennsylvania contracted Air Compliance Testing, Inc. ofCleveland, Ohio to conduct compliance stack emissions testing for their Ceric Kiln (Source ID: 113). Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuantto Glen-Gery Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008
.. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008. Sampling was performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate oftotal filterable particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (S02), 

### sulfuric acid mist (H2

### S04), 

### hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Sampling was also performed at the Ceric Kiln Wet ScrubberExhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate ofnitrogen oxides (NOx) (as N02), 

### carbon monoxide (CO), and total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMOs). Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the product S32. Duringthis test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. Visible Emissions (YEs) measured as percent opacity were also monitored at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the maximum six-minute average ofopacity. The test methods that were conducted during this test were EPA Methods I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A.
1.2 KeyPersonnel
The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were:

Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076 John Guth, Air Quality Program Manager, PA DEP- Northwest District Office, 814-332-6940 Philip J. 

### Billick, President, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 Sin Hoi Chiew, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 2 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix
The purpose ofthis test was to determine the mass emission rate oftotal filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCl, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate ofNOx (as N02), 

### CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. YEs (measured as %-opacity) were also determined at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The specific test objectives for this test were to:

Measure the concentration oftotal filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCl, and HF atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also measure the concentration ofNOxo CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate ofthe stack gas at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Utilize the above variables to determine the mass emission rate oftotal filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCl, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate ofNOx (as N02), 

### CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Determine the maximum six-minute average ofopacity at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 presents the sampling and analytical matrix log for this test. 

### 2.2 Field Test Changes andProblems
The intermediate sampling train leak check performed during Run I at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct yielded a leakage rate which was greater than the allowable leakage rate of 0.020 cfm. Therefore, Run I was voided and three additional runs (Runs 2-4) were performed at both the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Results from Run I are not included in this test rep01t.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 3 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant


### 2.3 Presentation ofResults
Two (2) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate oftotal filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber InletDuct while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration oftotal filterable PM, HCl, and HF and a second sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of S02 

### and H2

### S04. 

### Three (3) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate oftotal filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCl, HF, NOx (as N02), 

### CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecnlar weight, moisture content, and concentration oftotal filterable PM, HCl, and HF and a second sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration ofS02 

### and H2

### S04• 

### A third sampling train was utilized to measure the stack gas concentration ofNO, CO, and TGNMOs.

Table 2.2.1 displays the mass emission rate oftotal filterable PM, HCI, and HF measured at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and the mass emission rate ofNOx (as N02), 

### CO, and TGNMOs atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stackwhile operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Table 2.2.1 also displays the maximum 6-minute average ofopacity measured atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Table 2.2.2 displays the mass emission rate ofS02 

### and H2

### S04 

### at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The mass emission rate displayed in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack utilize the saturated moisture content values determined for the given stack gas temperatures and pressures as per Section 4.0, ofEPA Method 4. The measured flue gas percent byvolume moisture contents were higlfer than the calculated saturated values which is indicative ofthe presence ofentrained moisture droplets in the stack gas. The concentration ofTGNMOs measured during Runs I and 3 atthe Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack were reported to be below the accepted EPA Method 25 Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of50 ppmvd. The accepted MDL is approximately I0-times the analytical laboratory Level ofQuantification (LOQ) of5 ppmvd. Concentration values in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 denoted with a'<' were measured to be below the minimum detection limit (MDL) ofthe applicable analytical method. Mass emission rates denoted with a'<' in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 were calculated utilizing the applicable MDL concentration value instead ofthe "as measured" concentration value.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page4 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### The graphs that follow Table 2.2.2 presentthe raw, uncorrected concentration data measured in the field by the EPA Method 7E and 10 sampling systems at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Tables 2.3.1

- 2.3.3 display the measured results for the VE readings performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The minimum, maximum, and maximum six-minute average opacity readings are displayed for each run.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 5 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Comoration - Hanley Plant

EPA TEST METHODS UTILIZED MI/M2 M3 M4 M5 M9 M7E MIO M25 M26A (Flow) IDrv Mol. WL\ C'loHzO) (Filterable PM\ iVEs\ (NO,) iCOl iTGNMOs\ iHClandHF\ Run Sampling Time I Sampling Time I SamplingTime I SamplingTime I SamplingTime I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I SamplingTime I Date No.**Samplin~** Location Duration (min)**Duratio~** (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) 612412008 I Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 12:23-14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 Duct 

### - - 

### - - 90 90 90 90 90 6/24/2008 2 Ceric Kiln ScrubberInlet 15:45- 18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:45 18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:45- 18:53 Duct 

### - - 

### - - 90 90 90 90 90 612412008 3 Ceric Kiln ScrubberInlet 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 Duct - 

### - - 

### - 90 90 90 90 90 6/24/2008 I Ceric Kiln Scrubber 12:23-14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23-14:19 12:23- 13:23 10:31-11:49 10:31 -11:49 10:31- 11:49 12:23-14:19 Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 6/24/2008 2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber 15:45- 18:53 15:45-18:53 15:45-18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:15- 16:45 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 15:45- 18:53 Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 6/24/2008 3 Ceric Kiln Scrubber 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 18:10- 19:10 15:39- 16:59 15:39-16:59 15:39- 16:59 19:48-21:33 Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 AU times are Eastern DaylightTime. Table 2.1.1 -Sampling and Analytical Matrix

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page6 AirCompliance Testing, fnc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant



### EPATEST METHODSUTILIZED Ml/M2 M3 M4 M8 (Flow) _(Dry Mol- Wt) (%H20) (S02 and H2S04) Run Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Date No. Sampling Location Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) 

### 612512008 2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 10:31

- 11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 Duct 60 60 60 60 6/25/2008 3 eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28

- 14:44 Duct 60 60 60 60 6/25/2008 4 eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 Duct 60 60 60 60 6/25/2008 2 eerie Kiln Scrubber 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 6/25/2008 3 eerie Kiln Scrubber 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 

### 612512008 4 eerie Kiln Scrubber 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39-17:01 Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 All times are Eastern DaylightTime. 

### Table 2.1.2

- Sampling andAnalytical Matrix

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 7 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Slack Emission Test Report

Test Dale: June 24 and 25, 2008 Ceric Kiln Scrubber InletDuct Run 1 Run2 Run3 Average Product ThroughputRate (tonlhr Total Filterable Particulate Maller Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product - Total Front-HalfParticulate ManerMass Emissioo Rate (lblhr 3.38 3.40 5.05 3.94 Total Froot-HalfParticulate Maller Concentration (grainsfdscl) 0.023 0.024 0_035 OJJ27 Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate(!b/ton-product) Hydrogen Chloride Scrubber Removal Efficiency (lbihr) Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (Jbihr) <0.268 < 0.178 < 0.255 < 0.233

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration (ppmvd) <2.76 < 1.87 <2.65 <2.43 Hydrogen Fluoride MassEmission Rate (lbfton-product) 

### - - -

Hydrogen Fluoride Scrubber Removal Efficiency (%) - Hvdro en Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lbihr) 14.27 10.96 15.04 13.42

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration (ppmvd 269 209 285 254 Maximum Six-Minute AverageofVisible Emissions (%-opacity 

### -

Nitrol!en Oxides Mass Emission Rate (]b/ton-oroduct as NO 

### - Nitrogen Oxides Mass Emission Rate !bthras NO, - Nitrogen Oxides Concentration (ppmvd Carbon Monoxide Mass Emission Rate (lblton-product - Carllon Monoxide Mass Emission Rate (]b/hr

CarbonMonoxide Concentration (ppmvd VOC Mass Emission Rate (!b/ton-oroduct as propane) - VQC Mass Emission Rate (]bfhr as ropane) TGNMO Mass Emission Rate (lblhr as carbon

TG!'-<"MO Concentration (ppm-.-.J as carbon) - Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (acfrn) 30,739 30,481 30,647 30,622 Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (scfrn) 18,779 18,472 18,620 18,624 StackGas Average Flow Rate (dscfrn) 17,064 16,814 16,933 16,937

Stack Gas AverageVelocity (fpm 3,233 3,206 3,224 3,221 Stack GasAvera_ge Static Pressure (in-H 0 -0.11 -0.19 -0.18 -0.16 Stack Gas Avera_ge Temperature ("F 374 377 376 376 Stack Gas Percent byVolume Moisture**("/oH****0)*~** 9.13 8.98 9.06 9.06 Measured Stack Inner Diameter in • 4Lh4L8 41.7;;41.8 41.7x41.8 4L7x4L8 Percent byVolume Carbon Dioxide in StackGas (DryBasis) (%C02 1.00 1.00 !.00 1.00 Perc<:ntby Volume Qxvgen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%0 17.00 16.50 16.83 16.78 Percentby Volume Nitro_gen in Stack Gas lDIY Basis) (%N,) 82.00 82.50 82.17 82.22 The "<'" symbol in<!ica"" !hat<:00\pmlnd was not present in qus.ntities sbov<: !heMinimwn**D>tee~ion**Limit(MOL) of!.M analytical method for a\ leas! one """Flo treaioo. "Tho O:rieKiln Scrubberh1!1;1 Dtl<;t :mdCorie Kiln ScrubberE>:hsu<t Staok were cl!iptical inshape. ••s.:. section 2.3 ferdetails Table2.2.1- EPA Method 26A Emission Results

Pagea Glen-Gery Comorntion- Hanley Plant

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack Run l Run2 Run3 Average 14.68 14.68 14.68 14.68 0.116 0.132 0.155 0.135 L70 1.95 2.28 1.97 0.010 O.Oll 0.013 0.011 < 0.0038 <0.0042 <0_0050 < 0.0043 > 79.39 > 65.60 > 71.08 > 72.02 <0.055 <0.061 <0.074 <0.063 <0.480 <0.531 <0.627 < 0.546 < 0.0082 < 0.0093 < 0.0103 <0.0092 >99.16 > 98.76 >99.00 > 98.97 <0.121 <0.136 <0.151 <0.136 < !.91 <2.14 <2.34 <2.13 6.46 4.58 5.00 5.35 0.124 0.!27 0.130 0.127 !.82 1.87 1.90 !.86 12.58 12.81 12.83 12.74 1.58 1.43 1.42 1.47 23.14 20.94 20.85 2L65 262 236 231 243 <0.157 0_\77 <0.161 <0.165 <2.310 2.602 <2.363 <2.425 < L89 2.13 <1.94 < 1.99 <50.0 56.0 <50.0 <52.0 26,228 26,520 27,109 26,619 22,972 23,151 23,640 23,254 20,229 20,344 20,694 20,422 4,311 4,359 4,456 4,376 ·1.03 -0.66 -0.82 -0.83 !20 120 121 121 11.94 12.13 12.46 12.18 33.0 X33.8 33.0 X 33.8 33.0 X33.8 33.0x33.8 1.00 !.00 1.00 1.00 16.37 16.50 16.50 16.46 82.63 82.50 82.50 82.54

AfrCompliance Testing, Inc. - 000609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberInletDuct Run2 ProductThroughput Rate (ton/hr) 

## - S02 Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) 

## - S02 Scrubber Removal Efficiency(%) 

## - S02 Mass Emission Rate (lblhr) 42.77 S02 Concentration (ppmvd) 261 H2S04 Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) 

## - H2S04 ScrubberRemoval Efficiency(%) 

### - H2S04 Mass Emission Rate (lblhr) 9.70 H2S04 Concentration (ppmvd) 38.63 StackGas Average Flow Rate (acfm) 29,779 Stack Gas AverageFlow Rate (scfin) 18,229 Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (dscfin) 16,451 Stack Gas AverageVelocity (!pm) 3,132 Stack Gas Average Static Pressure (in-H20) -0.23 Stack Gas Average Temperature CF) 376 Stack Gas Percentby Volume Moisture (%H20)** 9.76 Measured Stack Inner Diameter (in)* 41.7x41.8 Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (DryBasis) (%C02) Percent by Volume Oxygen in StackGas (Dry Basis) (%02) Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N2) *The Ceric Kiln InletDuct and Ceric Kiln Wet ScrubberExhaust Stack were elliptical in shape. **See section 2.3 for details 0.00 16.50 83.50 

### Run3 Run4 Average



## - - -

- 

## - -

- - - 40.66 42.11 41.85 238 249 249



## - - -

- - - 10.90 10.86 10.49 41.75 41.97 40.78 31,063 30,650 30,497 18,939 18,730 18,633 17,098 16,945 16,831 3,267 3,224 3,208 -0.22 -0.20 -0.22 378 373 376 9.72 9.53 9.67 41.7 x41.8 41.7 X41.8 41.7 x41.8

0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 16.83 83.00 83.00 83.17



### Table 2.2.2

- EPAMethod 8 Emission Results

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page9**Glen~Gery** Corporation**~** Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack Run2 Run3 Run4 Average 14.68 14.68 14.68 14.68 1.68 1.79 1.74 1.74 42.31 35.48 39.22 39.01 24.67 26.23 25.59 25.50

121 126 124 124 0.147 0.168 0.191 0.168 77.81 77.38 74.25 76.48 2.15 2.47 2.80 2.47 6.87 7.71 8.89 7.82 26,725 27,300 27,135 27,053 23,454 23,937 23,658 23,683 20,516 20,933 20,610 20,686 4,393 4,487 4,460 4,447 -1.00 -0.64 -0.96 -0.86

122 122 123 122 12.53 12.55 12.88 12.65 33.0 X 33.8 33.0 x33.8 33.0 x33.8 33.0 X33.8

0.33 0.00 0.00 0.11 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 83.67 84.00 84.00 83.89

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation · Hanley Plant

"C 

### > 

### E c. 

### c.



# -g E 0.. 0.. 

### Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

## NOx Concentration 

# 40,---------------------------------------------------------, 36 32 

### 28 24 

### 20 """"""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""" """ 16 12 8 4**>--::":~===""""""""""~""";.;;"""="" ::.:;;:;=~~**  L**"""""""""""""""""""""""""""~" 0+--r~--~~~~~-r--,-,--r--,-,-~--.-,-~--r-~~--~** 



### Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

## NOx Concentration 

# 40,--------------------------------------------------------, 36 32 

### 28 24 

### 20 16 12 ""

8 4**0+-~--,-~----~--.-~--.--,--,-~--.-~.-.---.--r--.--.--.-~**

## #$$$~~~~,$~~,#~,,#,~**~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** 

### ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

### Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

## NOx Concentration 

# 40,--------------------------------------------------------. 36 32 

### 28 24 

### 20 16 12 8 4 -----·-·--------··-··---**.~~~~~~ ~~----~** **0+-~--,-~----~--.-~--.-~--,-~--.---.--r--.--r--.-~----~ "'~~L.~~~.~~~><.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**  vo**v~ v~**  v <:;Y**~y** <:;Y**~y ~y** **~· ~·v** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~y ~y** **~y ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~ ~** **~ ~** **~ ~** **~**

## ~~~~~~~~~~~~~#######

Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 10 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. · 

### 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant



## -g E 0.. 0..



## -g E 0.. 0..

"C 

### > 

### E c. c. 

### Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration

## 300r:~~~~~~~~::==~::~::~~~::::~~~

# ~~~ "'\r·

..

# ~·0 ....

# <**-~ ~** **~**

# •. ., -•**-.~ ~-~~** **~:7:'2:** 180
... 150 120

90 60
..................... 30**0+--r~--~-r~--~-r~~~-r--r-,-~--r-,-~--r-~~--~**



### Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration 300,------------------------------------------------------------. 224700
.. ········_;., .f.

...**~~ :~**  

## .. r···'""''·"''·
..,.•,..,.. 210 180 150 120

90 60 30 .II. ,No/),
.. 

### IM
........A.
... .•• •......1/V
..A. ····-"



## . ......"
....-.\':

..-.'........ .."1... "**O+-~--~~--,--,--,-~--~~--~--.--r--.--r--.--r--~-r--~-4**

## ~$$$~~~~,,~$#~#####~**~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** **~~ ~~** 

### ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration 300,---------------------------------------------------------. 270 240 210 180 150 120
. . . ........................... .

90
......................................................... 60 30**0+--r--~.-~--r--r~--~-r--r-,-~--r--r~--~~--r-~~**



### Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 11 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 

### 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation**~** Hanley Plant

Max 6 min avera e 6.46 Minimum Readin 0 Maximum ReadirlO- 10.00! Start Time 12:23 End Time 13:23 Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute avera es: Min. I

0 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 1 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 2 5 5 0 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 3 5 5 0 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 6 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 7 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 6 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 9 5 5 5 0 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 10 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 11 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 12 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 13 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 14 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.21 5.21 15 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 16 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 17 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 18 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 19 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 20 5 10 5 5 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.58 21 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 22 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 23 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 24 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 25 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 26 5 5 0 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 27 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 28 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 29 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 30 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 31 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 32 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 33 0 5 5 5 4.58 4.79 5.00 5.21 34 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.42 5.42 5.42 35 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.63 36 5 5 5 0 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 37 5 5 5 5 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 38 5 5 5 5 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 39 5 10 10 10 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 40 5 5 5 5 5.63 5.83 6.04 6.04 41 10 5 5 5 6.04 5.83 5.83 5.83 42 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6,04 43 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 44 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 45 5 10 10 5 6.25 6.46 6.25 6.04 46 10 10 5 5 6.04 5.83 5.63 5.63 47 5 5 5 10 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 48 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.63 49 5 5 5 5 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 50 5 5 5 10 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.42 51 10 5 5 5 5.21 5.00 5.00 5.00 52 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 53 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 54 10 5 5 5 5.00 55 5 5 5 5 56 5 5 0 5 57 5 5 5 5 58 5 5 5 5 59 5 Table 2.3.1 M VIsible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 12 AirCompliance Testing, Inc.**~** 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant

Max 6 min avera e 4.58 Minimum Readin 0 Maximum Readin 5.00 Start Time 15:45 End Time 16:45 Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute averages: I Min.

0 5 5 5 5 3.13 3.13 3.13 2.92 1 0 5 5 0 2.71 2.92 2.92 2.71 2 5 0 5 5 2.92 2.71 2.92 2.71 3 5 5 0 0 2.50 2.29 2.29 2.29 4 0 5 0 5 2.50 2.50 2.29 2.50 5 5 0 0 5 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.71 6 5 5 0 0 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.92 7 5 5 0 5 3.13 2.92 2.92 3.13 8 0 5 0 0 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.33 9 0 5 0 5 3.33 3.54 3.54 3.54 10 0 0 5 5 3.54 3.75 3.75 3.75 11 5 0 5 5 3.75 3.54 3.75 3.54 12 5 5 5 5 3.54 3.54 3.54 3.54 13 0 5 5 5 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 14 0 5 5 0 3.33 3.54 3.54 3.54 15 5 5 0 5 3.75 3.75 3.54 3.75 16 5 0 5 5 3.75 3.75 3.96 3.96 17 0 5 0 5 3.96 4.17 3.96 4.17 18 5 5 5 0 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 19 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 20 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.17 4.17 4.17 21 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 22 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 23 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 3,96 24 5 5 5 0 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.96 25 5 5 5 5 4.17 3.96 3.96 3.96 26 0 5 5 5 3.75 3.96 3.75 3.75 27 5 5 5 5 3.75 3.54 3.54 3.54 28 5 0 5 5 3.54 3.54 3.75 3.75 29 0 5 0 5 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.96 30 5 5 5 5 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.96 31 0 5 5 0 3.96 4.17 4.17 3.96 32 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 33 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 34 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 35 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.58 36 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 37 5 5 0 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 38 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 39 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 40 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 41 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.17 42 5 0 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 43 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 44 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.17 45 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 46 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 47 5 5 0 5 4.17 3.96 3.96 4.17 48 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 49 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 50 5 5 0 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 51 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 52 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 53 0 5 5 5 4J7 4.38 4.38 4.17 54 5 5 5 5 4.17 55 0 5 5 5 56 5 5 0 5 57 5 5 5 5 58 0 5 5 5 59 5 5 0 5 Table 2.3.2 -Visible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 13 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emlss!on Test Report Glen.GervCorporation

- Hanley Plant

Maxs, i

! !

## ~

i s.oo I i 18:101
Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute avera es; Min.

0 5 5 0 5 3.96 3.96 3.96 4.17 1 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 2 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 3 0 5 5 0 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.17 4 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 5 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 6 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 7 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 8 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 9 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 10 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 11 0 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 12 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 13 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 14 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 15 5 5 0 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 16 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 17 0 5 5 0 4.58 4.79 4.58 4.58 18 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 19 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 20 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 21 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 22 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 23 5 0 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 24 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 25 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 26 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 27 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 28 0 5 5 5 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 29 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 30 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 31 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 32 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 33 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 34 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 35 0 5 5 5 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 36 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 37 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.79 38 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 39 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 40 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 41 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 42 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 43 5 5 0 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 44 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 45 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 46 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 47 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 48 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 49 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 50 5 0 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 52 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5 5 5 5 4.79 55 5 0 5 5 56 5 5 5 5 57 5 5 5 5 58 5 5 5 5 59 5 5 5 5 Table 2.3.3- Visible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 14 AirCompliance Testing, Inc
. . 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 Process Description and Operation Glen-Gery Corporation manufactures a wide range ofbrick products. The Hanley, Pennsylvania facility operats the Ceric Kiln which has a permitted capacity of 16.00 ton/hr. Ceric Kiln was in operation during the performance ofthis test event. Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic. 3.2 Control Equipment Description During this test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber.


### 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations
3.3

### .I Ceric Kiln Scrubber InletDuct

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of41.7-inches and 41.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the horizontial plane and was accessed from a permanent platform arrangement. Two (2) 3.0-inch !.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method I, Section 1!.1.1 criteria. Priorto emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verif'y the absence ofcyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of4.34° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method I, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCI and HF concentration determination. 3.3.2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of33.0-inches and 33.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a manlift. Two (2) 3.0- inch I.

### D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method I, Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verif'y the absence ofcyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of4.67° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method I, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, S02, 

### H2

### S04, 

### HCI and HF concentration determination. The stack was also traversed for stack gas NOx and CO concentration determination. A single point located in an area ofaverage velocity was utilized to determine the concentration ofTGMNOs. Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 15 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant


### 3.4 Process Sampling Location
The EPA Reference Test Methods performed did not specifically require that process samples were to be taken duringthe performance ofthis testing event. It is in the best knowledge ofAir Compliance Testing that no process samples were obtained and therefore no process sampling location was identified in this report. See Glen-Gery Corporation

- Hanley Plantpersonnel for any process sampling locations which may have been utilized unknowingly to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. during this testing event.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 16 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8,and26A

### ~ sampling location r / 

## '

Ceric Kiln 

### / 

# "

-·----------- ·-·---'
-----

---'-----------------·---

--------

## -----------

-----

## -------------- 

## "-..

Wet Scrubber EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ?E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A sampling location



### Figure 3.1

- Ceric Kilu Process Schematic

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 17 i!'**~** 0.**~**

## ~

Fan Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

# I 41.7"x41.8"1.D. 

# ' Q · 

# r Elliptical Stack

# ~ 364.5" 8.72 Equivalent Diameters Upstream

From Disturbance

# /~ .,,9· 0,; 

# 0 431.0" 10.31 Equivalent

## ~ Diameters Downstream 

# i From Disturbance (2) 3.0" Sampling Ports

Located goo Apart
Point %of Duct Depth Distance From Inside Wall (in.) (Port 1) Distance From InsideWall (in.) (Port2)**~ ~<-** 

# ~' ',' 

# '\ 1 4.4 1.8 1.8 2 14.6 6.1 6.1 3 29.6 12.4 12.3 4 70.4 29.4 29.6 5 85.4 35.7 35.6 

## ' 

# "'**~** 

## '

# ~ Q,o<::- 6 95.6 40.0 

# I 39.9

----

# ~ '}**~·** «o<::-



### Figure 3.2

- Ceric Kiln ScrubberInletDuctTraversePointLocation Drawing

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 18 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report



# 1

0 ::J



# 1 

# -r

300" 8.88 Equivalent Diameters Upstream from Disturbance Port 1

(2) 3.0" I.D.



### - +- Sampling Ports Located 90' Apart

72" 2.13 Equivalent Diameters Downstream from Disturbance Point 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
\_ 33.8" X 33.0" I.D. 9 10 Elliptical Stack 11 12 Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant

f------33.8" I.D.------'>1



# w 8.5" 3 5 2 4 6 8 7

Port 2 Distance From InsideWall (in.) % of Duct Depth Port 1 2.1 1.0 6.7 2.3 11.8 4.0 17.7 6.0 25.0 8.5 35.6 12.0 64.4 21.8 75.0 25.4 82.3 27.8 88.2 29.8 93.3 31.5 97.9 32.8 9 10 12 

# g b 11 ..; 

# "'

Distance From Inside Wall (in.) Port 2

1.0 2.2 3.9 5.8 8.3 11.7 21.3 24.8 27.2 29.1 30.8 32.0 

### Figure 3.3

- Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust StackTraverse PointLocation Drawing

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 19 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4.1 Test Methods


### 4.1.1 EPA Method I: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source Principle: To aid in the representative measurement ofpollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is selected, and the cross-section ofthe stack is divided into a number ofequal areas. A traverse point is then located within each ofthese equal areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination ofStack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe orreverse type) pitottube. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination ofDry Molecular Weight Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one ofthe following methods: (I) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent C02, 

### percent 0 2, 

### and ifnecessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight determination a Pyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. 4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination ofMoisture Content in Stack Gases Principle: A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. 4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination ofParticulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Front-HalfPM only) Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ± 

### l4°C (248 ± 

### 25°F) or such othertemperature as specified by an applicable subpart ofthe standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal ofuncombined water. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. 4.1.6 EPA Method 7E: Determination ofNitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) (Concentrations assumed less than 2,000ppm) Principle: A sample is continuously extracted from the effluent stream; a portion ofthe sample stream is conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination ofNOx concentration. Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure reliable data. This method was utilized in its entirety as perthe procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 20 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 4.1.7 EPA Method 8: Detennination ofSulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources Principle: A gas sample is extracted isokinetically from the stack. The sulfuric acid mist (including sulfur trioxide) and the sulfur dioxide are separated, and both fractions are measured separately by the barium-thorin titration method. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.8 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination ofthe Opacity ofEmissions from Stationary Sources Principle: The opacity ofemissions from stationary sources is detennined visually by a qualified observer. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. 4.1.9 EPA Method I0: Determination ofCarbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Concentrations assumed less than I0,000 ppm) Principle: An integrated or continuous gas sample is extracted from a sampling point and analyzed for carbon monoxide (CO) content using a Luft-type nondispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) orequivalent. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. 4.1.10 EPA Method 25: Determination ofTotal Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon (assumed concentration oforganics will be less than I,000,000 ppm as carbon, and that there will be no chlorinated organic compounds in the stack gas) Principle: An emission sample is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate through a heated filter and a chilled condensate trap by means ofan evacuated sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are determined by independently analyzing the condensate trap and sample tank fractions and combining the analytical results. The organic content ofthe condensate trap fraction is determined by oxidizing the NMO to C02 

### and quantitatively collecting it in the effluent in an evacuated vessel; then a portion ofthe C02 

### is reduced to CH4 

### and measured by an FID. The organic content ofthe sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a portion ofthe sample into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from carbon monoxide (CO), C02, 

### and CH4; 

### the NMO are oxidized to C02, 

### reduced to CH4, 

### and measured by an FID. In this manner, the variable response ofthe FID associated with different types oforganics is eliminated. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.11 EPA Method 26A: Determination ofHydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources-Isokinetic Method Principle: This method is applicable for determining emissions ofhydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride (HCI), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X2) 

### [chlorine (Ciz) and bromine (Br2)] 

### from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore particularly suited for sampling at sources, such as those controlled by wet scrubbers, emitting acid particulate matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix A. The sampling trains utilized during this testing project are depicted in Figures 4.1

- 4.4.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 21 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant


### 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data
Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation

- Hanley Plant personnel utilizing theirtypical record keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the conclusion ofthis test event. The process data is located in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 and in the Appendix.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 22 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant
THERMOCOUPLE HEATED


## f

# ~ C) 

# CMt

7 ,-PROBEr+--+----v IMPINGER TRAIN THERMOCOUPLE FILTER HOLDER WITH ABSORBING SOLUTIONS C)

-

GLASS PROBE TIP \PITOTTUBE THERMOCOUPLE
STACK HEATED GLASS LINED

# ~t 

# : 

# 'I**~** REVERSE TYPE PITOT TUBE

PITOT MANOMETER THERMOMETER

100m! 100m! 0.1N 0.1N 

## H,so, H,so, (standard {standard tip) ORIFICE empty (modified/

no tip)

### ~ GAS**EXIT~** 

### I I 

### I I 

## \7 I VI

MANOMETER Silica Gel 200-300g (modified/

no tip) THERMOCOUPLE CHECK VALVE

VACUUM

BY-PASS VALVE (FINE



### 0 LINE --------..

GAUGE VALVE (COARSE ADJUST) AIRTIGHT VACUUM PUMP 

### Figure 4.1 -EPAMethod 5 and 26A Sampling Train Schematic
Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 23 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report
TEMPERATURE SENSOR

# ------~;;c; :J-PROBE

'ITOTTUBE TEMPERATURE SENSOR

TYPE PITOT TUBE STACK WALL

MANOMETER

MANOMETER HEATED AREA

ORIFICE

### ~ Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant
IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL MAY BE REPLACED BY AN /THERMOMETER

100 miiPA

(std. tip) 

### H,Q, (mod. tip) THERMOMETERS



# .. .. EQUIVALENT CONDENSER



## H,o, (std. tip) BY-PASS



### 0 

# - MAIN VALVE AIRTIGHT

PUMP VACUUM LINE 

# /

Figure 4.2 - EPA Method 8 Sampling Train Schematic
Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 24 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report

STACKWALL

HEATED CALIBRATION VALVE HEATED SAMPLE LINE SAMPLE BY-PASS VENT Glen-Gerv Corooration - Hanley Plant

CALIBRATION GAS BY-PASS FLOW CONTROL VALVE

HEATED PROBE IN-STACK FILTER orOUT-OFSTACK HEATED FILTER

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 MOISTURE REMOVAL SYSTEM PUMP

SAMPLE 

## co**~** ANALYZER \ Ai FLOW CONTROL VALVE

SAMPLE GAS**f-1--1~**

MANIFOLD NOx ANALYZER

ANALYZER FLOW CONTROLVALVE FLOW CONTROLVALVE



### Figure 4.3 -EPA Method 7E and 10 Sampling Train Schematic

Page 25 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report

,- THERMOCOUPLES

'-- 

# fl**~** 

### Cl

,---, 

### \ I I

STAINLESS STEEL PROBE

L_ STACKWALL

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 

## I DUAL RANGE I I I I I I ROTAMETER VACUUM PUMP 

# I Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant

MANOMETER 

# +-

FLOW 

## I CONTROL 

## I \._....> VALVE 

# I 

# IS 

# ®**~** PURGE VALVE

# 1/ THERMOCOUPLE SAMPLE TANK VALVE

I 

## 1-- SAMPLE / VALVE



# .An '<.../ I STAINLESS

STEEL FILTER HOLDER HEATED BOX 

# :· D
1°

0 DRYICE 0

# ~ ROTAMETER

f:ONDENSATE TRAP SAMPLE TANK



### Figure 4.4 - EPAMethod 25 Sampling Train Schematic

Page 26 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

### 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 5.1 QA Audits
Tables 5.1.1 -5.9 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements oftheir respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1

- 5.2.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. Tables 5.3 and 5.4 illustrate the nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide calibration audits which were performed during this test (and integral to performing EPA Method 7E, and 10 correctly) were all within the Measurement System Performance Specifications of±3% ofspan for the Zero and Calibration Drift Checks, ±5% ofspan for the System Calibration Bias Checks, and ±2% ofspan for the Calibration Error Checks. Table 5.5 displays the N02 

### to NO converter efficiency check. The converter efficiency checkwas conducted as per the procedures contained in EPA Method 7E, Section 8.2.4 which requires a conversion ofat least 90%. As shown an average converter efficiency of97.34% was achieved for the NOx analyzer utilized at the Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack. Table 5.6 displays the EPA Method 25 train leak check audit results which were performed prior to each TGNMO concentration run. Table 5.7 displays the HCI and HF collection efficiency. The collection efficiency was determined in accordance with the Source Testing Manual (Revision 3.3), Section 2.8 which requires a collection efficiency of2: 95%. As shown all the collection efficiencies ofHCI and HF at both test locations were above the limit. Table 5.8 displays the results ofthe EPA Method 8 Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted byemail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. ofEnvironmental Protection. On July 15,2008, Mr. Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA Method 8, Section 11.4.3 criteria. Table 5.9 displays the results ofthe EPA Method 26A Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted by e-mail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. ofEnvironmental Protection. On July 14, 2008, Mr. Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA Method 26A, Section 11.5.3 criteria. Observer Charles Giffels was certified on April 2, 2008 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The expiration date is six months from the issue date. Forquality assurance, the observers obtained a view ofthe emissions with the best available contrasting background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sectorto their back. Readings were taken eve1y 15 seconds and made to the nearest 5% opacity.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 27 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant


### 5.2 QAIQC Problems
No QA/QC problems occurred duringthis test event.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 28 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant


### Ceric Kiln ScrubberInlet Duct Method 5 and 26A Sampling Train Run I Run2 Run3 Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfin' 0.002 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 0.003 I 0.001 Applicable Merbod Allowable LeakRate (cfm \ < 0.020 < 0.020 <0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume ofDry Gas Collected (dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 Recorrunended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 50.000 50.000 50.000 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent ofIsokinetic SamplingRate (% 98.7 101.8 101.1 Applicable Merbod Allowable Isokinetic Samplina Rate (% 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes


### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack Method 5 and 26A Sampling Train Run I Run2 Run3 LeakRate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm 0.003 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 Applicable MethodAllowable Leak Rate (cfm' < 0.020 <0.020 < 0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume ofDry Gas Collected (dscf) 59.262 58.661 62.859 Recorrunended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 50.000 50.000 50.000 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent oflsokinetic Sampling Rate (% 100.6 95.9 99.0 Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate(%' 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes


### Table 5.1.1 -EPAMethod 5 and 26A Sample Train Audit Results Table
Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 29 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

### Ceric Kiln ScrubberInlet Duct Method 8 Sampling Train Run2 Run3 Run4 Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm' 

### 0.002/0.002 0.002 I 

### 0.000 0.001/0.001 Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm 

### <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume ofDrv Gas Collected (dscf) 

### 37.241 38.137 37.860 Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 

### 36.000 36.000 36.000 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent of!so kinetic Sampling Rate(%' 

### 102.7 102.0 101.4 Applicable MethodAllowable lsokinetic Sampling Rate(%' 

### 100 ± 

### 10 100 ± 

### 10 100 ± 

### 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes


### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack Method 8 Sampling Train Run2 Run3 Run4 Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm 

### 0.001/0.001 0.002/0.00I 0.001/0.000 Applicable Method Allowable Leak 

### Rate (cfm' 

### <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume ofDry Gas Collected (dscf) 

### 39.553 40.319 40.0ll Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 

### 36.000 36.000 36.000 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent oflsokinetic Samplin,a Rate(% 

### 94.3 99.2 94.9 Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (% 

### 100 ± 

### 10 100 ± 

### 10 100 + 

### 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes


### Table 5.1.2- EPA Method 8 Sample Train Audit Results Table
Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 30 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation
- Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberInletDuct Post TestDry Gas MeterCalibration Average Post-Test CheckValue Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre MeterCalibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference

(Y) 

### (Yqa) (%) (%) 

### Acceptable 0.9988 1.0151 1.63% 5.00% Yes


### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack PostTest Dry Gas Meter Calibration Average Post-Test CheckValue Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter DifferenceFrom Pre Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference

(Y) (Yqa) (%) (%) 

### Acceptable 0.9994 1.0424 4.31% 5.00% 

### ' Yes 

### Table 5.2.1 -EPAMethod 5 and 26ADryGas MeterAuditResults Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 31 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberInletDuct Post Test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Average Post-Test CheckValue Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference

IV) 

### (Yaa) 

### (%) (%) Acceptable 0.9988 1.0162 1.74%
.5.00% Yes


### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack Post Test Dry Gas MeterCalibration Average Post-Test CheckValue Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference



### (Y) (Yqa) (%) (%) 

### Acceptable 0.9994 1.0349 3.56% 5.00% Yes .•.............. ---------- ------ ---------------- -- 

### Table5.2.2

- EPA Method 8 Dry 

### Gas MeterAuditResults Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 32 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack Nitrogen Oxide Analyzer Run 1 Acceptable Run2 Acceptable Run3 Acceptable Analyzer Span During TestRun (ppm' 50 YES 50 YES 50 YES Initial System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.1 N/A 0.8 N/A 0.6 N/A Final System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.8 N/A 0.6 N/A 0.9 N/A Actual Concentration ofthe Upscale Calibration Gas (ppm 23.1 N/A 23.1 N/A 23.1 N/A Initial System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm' 22.3 N/A 22.6 N/A 23.1 N/A Final System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm' 22.6 N/A 23.1 N/A 22.8 N/A

Initial System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas(% ofSpan 0.32 YES 1.80 YES 1.40 YES Final System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% ofSpan 1.80 YES 1.40 YES 2.00 YES Initial System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas(% ofSpan -1.60 YES -1.00 YES 0.00 YES Final System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% ofSpan -1.00 YES 0.00 YES -0.60 YES System Drift for Zero Gas (% ofSpan' 1.48 YES -0.40 YES 0.60 YES System Drift for Upscale Gas (% ofSpan' 0.60 YES 1.00 YES -0.60 YES Analyzer CalibrationErrorfor Zero Gas (% ofSpan -0.20 YES -0.20 YES -0.20 YES Analyzer CalibrationError for Mid-Level Gas (% ofSpan 0.04 YES 0.04 YES 0.04 YES Analy>;erCalibrationError for High-Level Gas (% ofSpan) -0.10 YES -0.10 YES -0.10 YES 

### Table 5-3 - EPA Method 7E Analyzer Calibration and QA Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 33 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrnbberExhanst Stack Carbon Monoxide Analyzer Run 1 

### Acceptable Run2 

### Acceptable Rnn3 

### Acceptable Analyzer Span During TestRun (ppm 615 YES 615 YES 615 YES Initial System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm -0.10 N/A 0.10 N/A -0.60 N/A Final System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.10 N/A -0.60 N/A -0.02 N/A Actual Concentration ofthe Upscale Calibration Gas (ppm 311 NIA 311 N/A 311 N/A Initial System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm 310 N/A 306 N/A 307 N/A Final System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm) 306 N/A 307 N/A 308 N/A

Initial System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% ofSpan 0.02 YES 0.05 YES -0.07 YES Final System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% ofSpan 0.05 YES -0.07 YES 

### O.o3 YES Initial System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% ofSpan -0.72 YES -1.24 YES -1.20 YES Final System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% ofSpan) -1.24 YES -1.20 YES -1.01 YES System Drift for Zero Gas (% ofSpan 

### O.o3 YES -0.11 YES 0.09 YES System Driftfor Upscale Gas (% ofSpan) -0.52 YES 

### O.o3 YES 0.20 YES Analyzer Calibration Error for Zero Gas (% ofSpan -0.03 YES -0.03 YES -0.03 YES Analyzer Calibration Error for Mid-Level Gas (% ofSpan 0.52 YES 0.52 YES 0.52 YES Analyzer Calibration Error for High-Level Gas (% ofSpan) 0.78 YES 0.78 YES 0.78 YES 

### Table 5.4- EPAMethod 10 Analyzer Calibration and QA Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 34 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report

Certified CylinderNOx Concentration (ppm) Maximum Analyzer Concentration (ppm as N02) Final Analyzer Concentration (ppm as N02) Analyzer ConcentrationPercentDecreaseFrom Maximum (% Applicable MethodAllowable Decrease (% Acceptable PerApplicable Metbod (Yes!No Analyzer Serial Number: CylinderNumber: Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack
22.92 19.86 19.85 0.031 <2.0 Yes
115 CC927233


### Table 5.5 - 

### NOx ConverterEfficiency Check

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 35 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant



### Ceric Kiln ScrnbberExhanst Stack Pressure Loss 

### Applicable Method Acceptable per

Observed Allowable Pressure Applicable EPA M25 Sampling (Pretest) Loss Method Train (mm-Hg) (mm-Hg) (Yes I 

### No) Run l 

### 7.00 91.00 Yes Run2 

### 18.00 91.00 Yes

L..... 

### Run3 

### 18.00 ' 

### 91.00
_ Yes 

### Table 5.6 -EPAMethod 25 LeakCheckAuditResults Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 36 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

### Glen-Gerv Corporation •Hanley Plant
eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct
Total Mass ofHClin Mass ofHCl in Last HCL Collection EPA M26A Sample Impinger Efficiency SamplingTrain (mg) (mg) (%) 

### Run 1 

### <6.60 0.08 98.79 Run2 

### <4.50 <0.13 100 Run3 

### < 6.43 < 0.14 100
eerie Kiln ScrnbberInlet Dnct
Total Mass ofHF in Mass ofHF in Last HF Collection EPAM26A Sample Impinger Efficiency SamplingTrain (mg) (mg) 

### (%) Run 1 

### 352.17 10.60 96.99 Run2 

### 276.52 5.51 98.01 Run3 

### 380.14 7.41 98.05
eerie Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack
Total Mass ofHCI in Mass ofHCI in Last HCL Collection EPA M26A Sample Impinger Efficiency SamplingTrain (mg) (mg) 

### (%) Run 1 

### < 1.22 <0.16 100 Run2 

### < 1.34 < 0.11 100 Run3 

### < 1.69 < 0.14 100
eerie Kiln ScrubberExhaust Stack
Total Mass ofHF in Mass ofHF in Last HF Collection EPAM26A Sample Impinger Efficiency SamplingTrain (mg) (mg) 

### (%) Run 1 

### <2.67 <0.16 100 Run2 

### <2.96 < 0.11 100 Run3 

### < 3.46 <0.14 100 The"<" symbol indicates thatcompound was not present in quantities above the Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) ofthe analytical method for at least one sample fraction. 

### Table 5.7- EPA Method 26A Collection Efficiency Results Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 37 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. · 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant



### MOS-3756-0lb/H- 0895 MOS-3756-0la/G

- 0523 EPA Audit Sample 1-D- 

### (H2

### S04) 

### (S02) Reported Concentration (mg/dscm) 

### 81.70 393.20



### Table5.8- EPAMethod 8 AuditResults

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 38 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant

EPA AuditSample I.D. 

### M26A- 3756-03/L-2728 M26A- 3756-04/L-2752 Reported Concentration as Cl (mg/L) 

### 7.47 7.47



### Table 5.9- EPAMethod 26AAuditResults

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 39 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation
- Hanley Plant 

### 6.0 APPENDIX Appendix attached.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 40 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

# APPENDIX to Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

# Determination ofTotal Filterable Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, SulfurDioxide,

SulfuricAcid, Carbon Monoxide, Total Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible Emissions Ceric Kiln EPAMethods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A Glen-Gery Corporation

- Hanley Plant Summerville, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 Job Number: 080609

Prepared by: 

## AirCompliance Testing, Inc. PO Box41156 Cleveland OH 44141**~0156** Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471)

Report Date: July 3!, 2008

## Appendix Contents PROCESS AND CONTRACTED LAB DATA Process Operational Data- All (PRINT) Contracted Lab Analytical Results -All Record of Custody Sheets
- Contracted 

### FIELD AND INTERNAL LAB DATA

- Excel Test Data Tabs (PRINT) Excel Method Specific Tab (PRINT) Excel Run Data Tab (PRINT) Example Calculation (PRINT) 

### flr 

### Pr 

## I+ ft A 

## A !+ A 

## ft A 

## A p, 

### 10 

## 13 Record of Custody Sheets
- In House Test Log (CEMS Methods) Main Method Field Data Sheets sokinetic Field Data Sheets 

### I? I 

### 1::1 {3 

# e, B 8 

### -.8



## 10 

## 13 U3 i3 ACT Laboratory Analysis (titrations) Gravimetric Analysis (Method 5, 17, and 202) Acetone/Inorganic/Organic Residuals Calc. EPA Method 9 Field Data EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery EPA Method 

### 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data EPA Method 

### 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets EPA Method 

### 1 Cyclonic Flow EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data EPA Method 1 Criteria (REAPEAT THIS SECTION FOR EACH STACK) 

### ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS [l]Analyzer Calibration Error [X]Analyzer System Bias and System Drift 

### EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS 

### I CALlBRA TIONS Probe Nozzle Inspections -All (lsokinetic Methods) Pre-Test Pilot Tube I Probe Inspections- All 

### EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS I 

### HISTORY Micromanometer Certificate (when utilized) Dry Gas Meter Calibration History Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History 

## OPG, -oo;z. Acetone Residuals History 

## loA {(-<>o

### 1 Calibration Gas Certifications 

### ot Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification x Reference Meter Calibration 

## i Q Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration Lake Balance (Method 4 and AL T-008) Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetries) VE Azimuth Tables VE Declination VE Certificates Intent to Test Notification (Compliance Only) (PRINT)
AT-MTB- o/3 Gamma

### -o.:,.'1~2r::;.~S::;-- DeiH ;>.,ot(;, Date 

### f5/:z.!i5/p6 T-PRB- _,67:1'7<>

__ T-PRB - 

### _,6'-'t-'-/
__ T-PRB-

___ _T-PITT-PITT-PITBAL- 

### ::...oo::...f,__
__BALB T-MTB- 

## ot6

Gamma -'o'+. 

### 11'3:?"""24.,.,.--- Del H /, 

## 7-15 Date 

### 5/:w/o2 T-PRB- _,6,::::o-fx

__ T-PRB -**-"G"'v..~~.8"** 

### __ CT-MTB-

__ _ Gamma DeiH ---- Date T-PRB-

__ _T-PRBT-PRBT-PITT-PITT-PITBALBAL- 

# ----

----

D T-MTB- ---- Gamma---- DeiH Date T-PRB-

__ _ T-PRB-

___ _ ; 10-Minute Cals -All
Post-Test Pilot Tube I Probe Insp.- All (Compliance Only) T-PRB-

___ _ T-PRB-

___ _ []]Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit [Z]Post-Test Thermocouple Check (Compliance Only)**Pre-** Test Meter Box Leak Check Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter I Orifice Calibration Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration T-PITT-PITT-PITBAL - ...::o...::o-"6:___ BAL- 

# § Post-Test Dry Gas Meter I Orifice Calibration Post-Test Meter Console Calibration *Post Test Calibrations Required for all Mini Meter Boxes and when Yqa does not pass.

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. -appendix checklists.xls-Appendix Checklist T-PITT-PITT-PITBALBAL-Location Test Date *Rate Cars/Day
KilniD113 6/24/2008 29

KilniD113 6/25/2008 29
Wet Scrubber CAM Data Date Time pH Setpoint 6/24/2008 10:00 AM 6.0 4:00PM 6.0 6/25/2008 10:00 AM 6.0 4:00PM 6.0 Fan speed during test: 75% (45.5 Hz) Operating Limits: pH: 4.3- 6.9 pH Units Flow Rate: 230 - 500 GPM Pieces Per Car

5,400
5,400

pH 6.02 6.04

6 5.99 

### Hanley 

### Plant Stack Test Process Data 

### June 

## 24. 25. 2008
, Weight Per Throughput Piece (lbs) (Tons/Hr)
4.5 14.68

4.5 14.68

Flow (GPM) 377.86 386.96 382.26 379.96 Product Type
Extruded

Extruded

Hanley Process Data June 24, 25 2008 Stack test fina!.xls Size **Raw Product Material Name
Standard 100% Clay S32 Blend
Standard 100% Clay S32 BlendPRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS 

# EPA Method-25 Laboratory Report PAL Job No: M25-0837 Client Name and SampleReceiptDate: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Simon 

# ' CaseNarrative: Authorized Signature:

# ~~**7/~g** This laboratory report ispresentedin 9parts. The Introduction is followed bya Summary of Am!tlyticalResults, Sample Volumetric Data, Method25AnalyzerDaily Calibration Data, SampleAnalysisData, Sample Chain of Custody, Method25 Calculations, InitialMethod25SampleRecoverySystem Performance data, 

### andMethod25 Calibration Gas Certificates of Analysis. 

## The following notes apply to 

## this testseries. 1.) Sampleswere receivedonJuly 2, 2008. Alltanks andtrapswere sealedandingoodcondition. Alltraps were on dry

### ice. 2.) Lab tankpressure/temperaturesmatched fieldvalues within I. 6%. Fieldmeasurementswere usedinallcalculations. 3.)Alltrapswere recoveredat300°C, then cleanedat 600°C. 4.) Allsample trappurgeswere stoppedwhen the trap effluentcontained <6ppm C02 ataflow rate of-100mllmin. 5.) Alltrap recoverieswere stoppedwhen the oxidation catalyst effluentcontained <10ppm C02 ataflow rate of -100ml/min. 6.) The Method-25 Sample RecoverySystem catalyst efficiencywas measuredas 100.03%prior to sample extraction. 7.) NoEPA M25Auditsampleswere submittedwith thisset of samples. 8) Example calculations for one sample arepresentedon thefollowingpage. 7/3/2008 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891.PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS

## Example~~Iculations 

# for sample: M250837-609-1 Sample Volume Noncondensable Organics Vs = (0.3857) (V) [(Pt/Tt)- (Pti/Tti)] 

## Ct={(Ptf7Ttf)/[(Pt/t)-(Pti/Tti)]} {(l/3)(X1

### + X2

### + X3

### )/DRFNMo} 

### Where V= sample tank volume = 0.006113 m3 

## IWhere Pt =sample tank pressure after sampling= 581.0 mm Hg Ptf= final sample tank pressure= Tt =sample tank temperature after sampling= 298.2 K Ttf = final sample tank temp. = Pti =sampletankpressure before sampling= 5.0 mm Hg Pt=sampletank pres. after sampling= Tt= sample tanktemperaturebefore sampling= 294.8 K Tt = sample tanktemp. after sampling = Vs =samplevolume= 0.004555 m3 Pt =sample tank pres. before sampling= 

# Condensable Organics, Cc Note that Cc isdefinedbyMethod25 at 11.2.2 Tti=sampletank temp. before sampling= 

### as the sum of C02 andanyNMO measuredin the ICV. X 1 

### = 1st GC response, NMO intank = {[(0.3857)(Vv)(Pf)]/[(Vs)(Tf)]}{[l/3] [(Xt+X 2

### +X3

### )/DRFc02

### +(Y1

### +Y2

### +Y3

### )/DRF1 • 1 

### Mo)]} X2

### = 2nd GC response, NMO 

### intank= 

### Where: 

# I x3 = 3rd GC response, NMO in tank= Vv = ICV volume = Pf= ICV final pressure= 0.003174 m3 1,175 mmHg 'DRFNMO = NMO response factor= Ct= noncondensable VOC = 1169.8 mmHg 300.2 K 581.0 mmHg 298.2 K 5.0 mmHg 294.8 K 9.57 areaunits 9.86 areaunits 10.88 area units area 

### l.

### 0194 units/ppmC

20.0 ppmC Vs= sample volume= Tf=final rCV temp.= 0.004555 m3 301.5 K 

# TGMlfOMass Concentration X1,2,3 

### = GC responses for C02 in the rev= DRF

### coz = C02 response factor = Y1,2,3 

### = GC responses for NMO in

### the ICV DRFNMo = NMO Response factor= Cc = condensableVOC = 16.77 15.66 1.0038 area counts/ppmC 1.27 1.29 1.0194 area counts/ppmC 18.3 ppmC 16.45
1.31 

### Where

# ~c = 0.4993 (Ct+Cc) = C 

### Where: Ct = noncondensable VOC= 20.0 ppmC Cc =condensable VOC = C = total VOC mass cone. ' 18.3 ppmC 19.1 mgC/m3

7/3/2008 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891.PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS 

# PALJob No: M25-0837 Client Name and SampleReceipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Simon
Listed results are not blank-corrected. PAL M25 field blanks average 10±5 ppmC

- .. 

### SAMPLE TRAPS RECOVERED AT 300°C. TGNMO concentrations as ppmC in

### the sample gas 

## Ct Cc *C02 

# co CH4 Non-condensable Condensable 

### Sample Run and ID ppm ppm ppm @ 

### -78°C, ppmC @ 

### -78°C, ppmC 

# CericKiln ScrubberExhaust

M250837-609-l 18,213 219 89 20 18

M250837-609-1 24,475 259 106 23 34

M250837-609-1 21,820 238 98 23 21 *C02 concentrations in the sample tanks may not be directly comparable dueto a potential interference ofup to

-11,000 ppm from the dry ice used to store and process the samples. This doesnot affect the VOC results. 

# c Total VOC ppmC

38

56

44

7/3/2008 PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, FL. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 

## Me Total VOC mgC/dscm

19.1

28.1

21.9PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 SAMPLE DATA 

## PAL Job No: M25-0837 ClientName and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: Jnly 2, 2008, by

### C.G. Simon 

# I Lab Lab %vol 

### Vs Analysis final final diff Vand 

### Pti 

## Pt Ttf and 1 

### Sample Analysis Volume tank 

### tank from



### Vv nnn 

## Tti nnn 

## Tt Ptfand 

## Pf Tf Volume Volume Sample pres temp field SampleiD Vessel ml Hg 

## OF K Hg 

### OF K psia nnnHg 

### OF K 

### ml ml Volume mbar 

### OF value 

## Ceric Kiln ScrubberExhaust

M250837-609-l Tank-108 6,113 5.0 71 

### 295 581 77 298 22.62 1170 81 300 4,555 9,188 2.017 778 81 -0.3% 

# I I I 

### trap-1018 ICV-147 3,174 

# I 22.72 1175 83 301 4,555 4,771 1.048 I 

## I I I 

## I I 

## I I 

# I I 296 

### I 22.68 I 

### M250837-609-l Tank-132 6,121 4.0 71 295 533 74 1173 80 300 1 

### 4,212 

### I 9,231 2.191 731 81 1.6% 

# I I 

## I ' 

## I I trap-1082 ICV-148 3,176 1 

### 22.40 1158 83 302 4,212 4,704 

### 1.117 

# I I I 

### I 

# I I 

# I I 

### M250837-609-l Tank-177 6,087 3.0 76 298 620 64 291 22.72 1175 82 

# I 301 4,980 9,171 1.842 857 80 0.6% 

# I I trap-1095 tiCV-149 3,171 22.54 11166 83 

# I302 

# I 4,980 4,726 0.949 I I 713/2008 PAL, Inc.: 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD 25 ANALYZER CALIBRATION 

# PALJob No: M25-0837 ClientName and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by 

### C.G. Simon Response Response Response Mean RFNormal Calibration Cal gas Analyzer x1

### Normal x2

### Normal x3

### Normal Response X Area Gas cone. ppmC Area Area Area Normal Area Counts/ % 

### Average Species ppmC range Counts Counts Counts Counts ppmC RSD RF

A-- C02 50.1 100 51.38 51.65 50.10 51.05 1.0189 1.62 ---'-- ---


### B

-- C02 50.1 100 49.61 49.89 49.11 49.53 0.9887 0.80 1.0038

-·-


### B--C02 9,933 20,000 10,050 10,047 9,971 10,023 1.0090 0.45

C

-- C02 9,933 20,000 9,999 9,976 9,965 9,980 1.0047 0.18 1.0069

A--NMO 60.30 100 60.03 60.27 60.60 60.30 1.0000 0.48

A--NMO 59.73 100 59.74 59.53 59.92 59.73 1.0000 0.32

- 

### B--NMO 59.73 100 62.26 61.49 62.41 62.1 1.0389 0.79 1.0194

A-- CH4 48.98 100 48.88 49.07 48.99 48.98 1.0000 019_

B

-- CH4 48.98 100 49.09 48.92 49.06 49.02 1.0009 018 1.0004

A--CO 51.03 100 50.16 51.04 51.89 51.03 1.0000 1.70

- 

### B--CO 51.03 100 52.02 51.49 50.84 51.45 1.0082 1.15 1.0041 7/3/2008, PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABS, INC. US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS DATA 

# PALJob No: M25-0837 Client Name and Sample receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Simon



## ----
Ctm & Display 

## RF

Ccm, Range 

### Normal TGNMO 

### ppmC 

### Ctmj and 

### Ccmk Mean (for 

### Area ppm in ppmC, AnalyzerResponses in normal reference 

### Calib. counts Sample 

### Ct & 

### SampleiD Vessel Species normalized area counts counts only) 

### factors /ppmC Gas 

### Cc M250837-609-1 Tank-108 C02 

### 9,123 9,039 9,111 9,091 20,000 B,C 1.0069 18,213 C, 

### NMO AV/SV= 2.017 as C 9.6 9.9 10.9 10.1 100 A,B 1.0194 20.0 20.0 CH4 43.92 44.62 44.03 44.2 100 A,B 1.0004 89.1

- 

# co 107.7 110.9 108.5 109.0 200 A,B 1.0041 219.1

-

# c" voc trap-1018 ICV-147 as C02 

### 16.8 15.7 16.4 16.3 50 A,B 1.0038 17.0 AV/SV= 1.048 NMO 1.27 1.29 1.31 1.3 

### 50 A,B 1.0194 1.3 

### 18.3 M250837-609-1 Tank-132 C02 

### 11,219 11,247 11,271 11,246 20,000 B,C 1.0069 24,475

-- 

### C, 

### NMO AV/SV= 2.191 as C 10.9 10.7 10.1 10.5 100 A,B 1.0194 22.7 22.7



## - CH4 48.90 48.46 48.36 48.6 100 A,B 1.0004 106.4

- 

# co 118.2 118.1 119.2 118.5 200 A,B 1.0041 258.7

-- 

### Cc, 

### VOC trap-1082 ICV-148 as C02 

### 29.1 30.2 29.4 29.6 50 A,B 1.0038 32.9

. 

### AV/SV= 1.117 NMO 0.60 0.59 0.62 0.6 50 A,B 1.0194 0.7 33.6 M250837-609-1 Tank-177 C02 

### 11,987 11,955 11,850 11,931 20,000 B,C 1.0069 21,820 C, 

### NMO AV/SV= 1.842 as C 13.2 12.5 12.1 12.6 100 A,B 1.0194 22.8 22.8 CR. 53.27 53.28 53.37 53.3 100 A,B 1.0004 98.1 

# co 129.5 129.9 130.3 129.9 200 A,B 1.0041 238.2

-- 

# c" voc trap-1095 ICV-149 as C02 

### 20.9 21.1 21.9 21.3 

# so A,B 1.0038 20.1 AV/SV= 0.949 NMO 0.98 1.03 1.00 1.0 50 A,B 1.0194 0.9 21.1 7/3/2008 PAL, Inc. 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891

# EPAMethod-25 Ch

- 

# >fCustod'.J 

### TestingConpany/JobNumber: Air C<>mplianoeTestinglllcI D80609B 

### FacEity!Loeatioo Tested: (B}Cerie" 

### Ki:n ScrullberExhaustStack 

### Source Tested: (B) 

### Ceric KilnScrubbeJ:ExhaustStack 

### TestDate: 6r2<!a<W8 Note:Measure trulkabsolute pressures dlrectlywilh·acalibrated absolute pressuregauge,!!!:... re<ord thetankvacuum witha Hgmanometer and 

### 1econl the looal barometric pr..ssure arthe sametime. Tape a thennocougie

### t<Jthefankand!"""dthe laJ]kteml"'raturee"cll tineataJ]kpressme is recorded; 

### Tank Tank Inilia! TankFinal**----------~·**
labllSI!

only Locat'on Run No. Trap No. TantNo. Initial hemJl'Unil Tank In:tial 

# ·! t TankFinal 

# l Temp!Unill TankFinal 

# I I 

# Io'F Pres!Unils

# I !> Vac!Urils Jnitial BP!Units 

# I Pres!Units s VaciUni!s FinalcB?/Units 1 IMk/ :DB06C9B 08()6V9B 0806()98 I



### Relinquished 

### by; Reooived by 'PALJobNo
. ....._

# ) I 1018 l!}O 2 1082 ],, I w•u '''" I 5mmHo 7IF 727mmHu 732rnmHa 581mmHg
. 

## fiF- ls4mmHa

### 735~ 

## !Z2Ji 'ti/ 0 I**·-~-** i --- I 4mmHg 

### 7IF 729 mmHg 733 mmH_g_ 533mmHa 74F 201 

### mmH__;;_ 7J4mmHa 

## i'"'/31_ 'f)/C 3**1nn~ "~**  1 w'" 1 ,., 1 JmmHg 76F 73lmmHg 734rnmHo 620mmHn 64F JI5mmHg 735minHg**X'~ ~o**  

### '

NOTES: H20

### appmx IO'l> C02 apjl:'OX (}.4%**·~** 

# rzJ:- fo_ELJ All 

### seal£

### intO<!? 

### .....

### ~e-5 

# 7/ .A

## l'\ Date: 

## -7/(t' d'S
.

# M4'4!#-s~ ' Date: '.::/-

### l:;l:j~ Comments: 

### T DlyiceOK? f

# JIY!~>oco

# 31

### Method .25 Record of Custody Sheet Shippingrrransportation Container Number:

_

## __!.J?Ln~l:___

# _______ _ o ..tG:
__ 

## 7_.

## _t_-_Q_s

__ _**~,oler** Number:

. 

# -····-,-----------.---.----,.-------------, Samole I. b. Nurnber 

### 080609 B· 1 • M25ffP**~ull** Si®atura D.at lime**Rea~on** for**Brt$~k.ing** Seal



## (TraP#!otll'. 

## J

080609 

### B·2 • M25ffP



### (Trap#

## (OfjL. )

080609 B- 3 • 

### M25{fP



### (Trap # 

# f ()'1_ J'") 

## B
.... 

## s 

# s /. 7 

### B 

## s 1',/L.{)

### ~ 

# n :n V». '111

### ~;;

# n

080609 

### B· 4 • M25ffP 

# 1-'-'R-+------------+----4-----l

(Trap 

### # ) s

080609 13- 1 • M25/TK



### (Tank# 

## f/)f; ) B 

# '

s / 

## /1 B 

# L//p l.. 

# / s >f.// 

## e 

# s B 

# s Cl 

## s Were all seals intact? 

### @!Ye:;::-s,_,..,....--h/1'--'No

# (~scribe**se~li.tl'nd** rees<:mipg in the

# "Re~kjl;) / 

# oKeoelved 

### By sample custodian / 1 

## f -u

## "'/~ 

# rf../__.,A- -/ '/ 

# /;</ 07? '·aps put in cooler by

AirCamp/ill.nce T&t:.tlll!h Inc. (Method 2S.xls·Record ofCustody Sheet) SI111200B (Date) 

## 7.(.06

(Date) 

# -

(f:oC)

(Time)

# tlldtes: PRECISIONANALY11CAL LABORATORIES, INC 2106 NW67TH PLACE, SU/TE.4, GAINESVILLE, FLORiDA 32653 (352) 335-1889 FAX(352) 335-1891 

## US EPA Reference Method 25 Sample Calculations

#.
. . 

### (1.) PAL
.. wses 931ibrated piezoelectric digital absolute pressure gauges aswell as open endl;ld r,nercury (Hg) filled u-tube manometers forfield and laboratory pressure measurements•. PreSs!)res measured

## witll. open ended Hg manometers are corrected to absolute (standard) pressures usinQ•the folloWing relation: (apsolute P) = (measured P) 

## + (barometric P) (2.) Temperatures are recorded in •F or

## •c and converted to Kelvins using the following relations: ('F-32)/1.8 

### + 273.15 = K, and

# •c + 273.15 

## =K Standard temperature 

## =

# zo·c = 293.15K (3.) 

# rn'some cases, the equations listed below are expanded versions ofthose presented in 40CFR

## F't. 60, 1\pp. A, Meth.

## 25, pp. 850-851 (Rev. July 1993). (4.) lhe folloWing relations are relevant to the equations below: 293.15K 

### 1760 mm Hg = 0.3857j(/mm Hg 293.15Kl1013 mbar= 0.2894 K/mbar 293.15Kl29.92" Hg 

## = 9.798 Klin. Hg 1 atmosphere= 1013 mbar= 760 mm Hg 

## =29.92" Hg 1" Hg pressure = 33.863 mbar

## =25.401 mm Hg
Inafollowing terms are used inthe equations below: C

# = TGNMO aoncentration ofthe effluent, ppm C equivalent Co

# = Calculated condensible organic (condensate trap) concentration ofthe effluent, ppm

# c equivilJel\t Cern= Measured concentration (NMO analyzer) forthe condensate trap ICV, ppm C02 

### + TH. · .,.,**C~·=** 

### Calculated noni:ondensible organic concentration (sample tank) ofthe effluent, ppm 

# c**equiva!~nt:** 

### ,·. Ctm = Measured cqncentratioh (NMO Analyzer) for the sample tank, ppm NMO. ••. ·· ·· ·•· · me=TGNMC> mass conCI;lntrationofthe effluent, mg C/dscril

· F =sample floW**rat~;** 

### cclmin.

Pf= Final pre5sure ofthe ICV, inches of Hg, absolute. Pb =Barometric pressure, inches of Hg or mbar (29.92" Hg = 1013 mbar) Pti

# = Gas sampiE;J tank pressure before sampling, mbar absolute. Pt =Gassample tank. pressure after sampling, mbarabsolute. 

### ?if= Final gas sample**l<~nk** 

### pressure after pressurizing, inches Hg absolute. If= Final temperature of lCV, Kelvins. Tti 

## =Sample tanktemperature before sampling, Kelvins. Tt =Sampletank temperature at completion ofsampling, Kelvins. ltf

# = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, Kelvins. V;. Sampletank volume, (cc). ·. . Vv = 

## rev volume, cc. Vs =gas volume sampled, cc.
· Vt =Sample train volume, cc. (Dimensional calculations yield Ct = 60 cc forPALtrains.)

n

# =numbe·r ofdata points q =total humber ofanalyzer injections of ICV during analysis (where !<=injection number, 1,**···~** 

### q). . :**~**



### r =total number of analyzerinjections' qfsample, tank during analysis (wherej=injection number, 1,
..., r). xi = individual measu'rements. · x =**me~n** 

### value t.P =Allowable pressur<:> change, inches Hg. 

## e ·=leak check period, minutes. ·•··. . 

# /PRECISIONANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC 2106 NW67TH PLACE, SUITE4, GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32653 (352) 335-1889 FAX(352) 335-1891 

## Method-25 Calculations Tank Volumes Procedure: Each tank was weighed to the nearest gramWhile filled with ambient air and while filled with degassed distilled water. The temperature ofthe waterwas measured and the volume ofthe tank calculated. V = 

### [wt. oftank + water (g)) - 

### [wt. oftank + air (g)) 

### I [density ofwater at the recorded temp. (glee)) 

## Pre-Sampling LeakCheckAllowable Pressure Change <lP = (0.01)(F)(Pb)(S)M

## =[( 0.01)(100 cc/min)(Pb)(5 min)]/ [ 60 cc] <lP = 2.5" Hg for a barometric pressure (Pb) of29.92" Hg. 

## Sample Volume Vs = (.3857)(V) [(PUTt) - (Pti/Tti)], or "Vs = (0.2894)(V) [(PUTt) - (Pti/Tti)] "This equation includes 

### 11 constant for pressure expressed in mbar.


## Noncondensible Organics. Ct Notes: Response factor= (calibration gas concentration, ppm as C) 

### I (instrument response, ppm as C) The M-25 analyzer has a reproducble interference of2.3 ppm NM as C per % C02 in the sample gas stream. Ct =8Ptf/Ttf) 

### I ·**(PUTt)-Pti/Tti)]~1/r** };0=1,

..r)Ctmj]- [C02 interference]}= (Analysis VI Vs) (Ctm) where Ctm = {[1/r S(j=1,

..r)Ctmj)- [C02 interference]}= [(avg NM integrator response) (Integrator range, ppm) (response factor) 

### I (1 000 units full scale)]-[(% C02 in tank at Ptf) (2.3 ppm NM as C interference/%C02l1 

## Condensible Organics, Cc Cc

# = (0.3857) (VvNs) [1/q };(k=1,

..q)Ccmk] 

### (Pf/Tf) where [1/q S(k=1,

..q)Ccmk] and Cern= (average C02 peak ht.) 

### I (1000 ht. units full scale) (C02 range, ppm) (response factor) 

## TGNMO Concentration C=Ct+Cc 

## TGNMO Mass Concentration me, mg/dscm =( 0.4993) (C)PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 SAMPLE RECOVERY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST 

### US EPA Reference Method 25 SampleRecovery System PerformanceTest, November 28-29, 2006. Performance Requirements: Average Recovery= 1 00±10%, triplicate analyses agree within a relative standard deviation (RSD) of5%. Syringe loads ofhexane and decane were weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg before and after injection using an Adam AAA160L analytical microbalance (Serial# AE048A114227), certified October, 2006. Analyst: Charles G. Simon, Ph.D. Hexane carbon content= 83.623% by weight !Decane carbon content= 84.412% by weight I ' 

### ' I Calculations: (mg C recovered)(100%)/mg C injected)-%recovery 

# l ppmC in ICV-[(cal gas C02 concentration, ppm)(ICV C02 area counts)/(avg before and after C02 cal gas area counts)]+ppmC hydrocarbon in ICV (ppmC in ICV)(ICV analysis volume in cubic meters)(0.4993)- mg C recovered 

## I ; 

## I 

# I I 

### mg ICV 

# I Analysis

## Iavg, before 

# I avg. after avg. ICV j 

### ppm ppm mgC f 

# I mg 

## I Carbon ICV Vol. 

# I Pf 

### Tf Vol. I 

### 9970 C0219970 C02
1

# I C02 area 1 

### C02 in HC in recovere 

## I % 

### ' ICV \ d 1

### Recovery SampleID injected injected No. ml 

# I psia 

## OF ml area counts area counts counts 1 

### ICV 

### ' Run-4 hexane \ 3,112 

# I 23.5o I I 

### 9.6 8.03 146 78 4,978 15,362 15,263 

# I 4,866 3,168 2.3 ! 

### 7.88 98.2% Run-5 hexane \ 10.8 9.03 147 3,173 

## I 23.58 78 4,997 

### I 15,288 15,298 5,400 I 

### 3,521 2.1 

# I 8.79 97.3% Run-6 hexane 

## I 

## I ! 

### 4,784 

# I 7941 9.8 8.20 148 3,175 

## I 24.02 78 5,093 15,288 I 

### 15,298 3,119 1.8 96.8% ' 

## i I I 

### I 

## I ! 

### AverageLowHexaneRecovery: 97.4% 

## I RelativeStandardDeviation 0.7% 

# I I 

### ' I I 

### 2.8 

# I Run-1 hexane 42.4 35.46 139 3,163 , 22.98 76 4,872 

## I 15,550 ! 

### 15,362 22,649 

# ! 14,610 35.55 100.3% Run-2 hexane 38.1 31.86 143 3,158 23.1o 

# I 76 4,890 

## I 15,550 15,362 19,954 I 

### 2.6 31.43\ 98.7% I 1 

### 12,871 Run-3 hexane 36.0 30.10 144 3,172 24.70 78 5,232 I 

### 15,550 15,362 17,850 11,514 2.7 30.091 99.9% 

# I I I 

# I AverageHighHexaneRecovery: 

# I 99.6% ' I 

### ' I 

# I I ' 

# I RelativeStandardDeviation ' 0.9% ' 

# I I 

# I 3.6 

# ! Run-7 decane 7.0 5.91 1149 3,110 1 

### 22.54 79 4,763 15,035 14,971 ' 

### 3,644 2,421 5.77 97.6% I 

### Run-8 decane [ 

## I I ' I 

### 4,766 

# ! I 

### 1,5311 2.6 

# I I 

### 4.5 3.80 \150j 3,172122.541 79 15,035 14,971 2,304 I 

### 3.65 96.1% I ' I 

### 1511 3,177 

# i 22.58 I 

### 78 4,791 

# I ! 

# I 3,812 

# i 2,5331 1.9 

# I Run-9 decane 

## I 7.3 6.16 15,035 

### I 14,971 6.06 98.4% I 

# I i 

# I I AverageLowDecaneRecovery: 97.4% 

# I I i 

### ! RelativeStandard**De~•iation** 

### 1.2% 

### I 

# i 152\ 3,174 22.70 

### I 78 

## I 4,812 

# I I I 

### 31.84\ 100.3% Run-10 decane 37.6 31.74 14,971 ' 

### 14,877 19,833 13,250 5.6 i 

### ' 

### Run-11 decane 40.8 

## I 34.44 1531 3,172\24.60 78 5,211 14,877 

## I 15,001 19,805 13,2181 2.4 34.401 99.9% Run-12 decane 1 

### 154 

# I 3,111 1 

### 24.68 I 

### 3.5 

# I 37.7 31.82 78 5,226 I 

### 15,001 14,916 18,001 11,998 31.32 98.4% I 

# i AverageHigh DecaneRecovery: 

## I 99.5% 

# I I I 

### RelativeStandard

## De~•iation \ 1.0% I I 11/29/2006 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida 32653. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891.

# II II II II

II 

# II II 

# II 

# RATACLASS Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 

## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas Assay laboratory P.O. No.: 792736 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-82649-001 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 

## ' PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Phone: 800-331-4953

Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGRING 21 06 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 Fax: 215-766-7226

This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol For Ass8y & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure**G~**1; September, 1997. Cylinder Number: ALM055366 Certification Date: 28May2008 Exp. Date: 28May2011 Cylinder PressUre***: 2000 PSIG COMPONENT PROPANE AIR CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) 20.1 PPM BALANCE *** Do not use ·when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig, ANALYTICAL ACCURACY** TRACEABILITY 

### +I· 1% Direct NIST and NMi

** Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G1, September 1997. REFERENCE STANDARD TYPEISRM NO. NTRM 1667 EXPIRATION DATE 04Jui2008 CYLINDER NUMBER ALM022121 CONCENTRATION 49.80 PPM COMPONENT PROPANE 

# II INSTRUMENTATION 

# II II 

# II II II· 

# II ' INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# VAR!AN/3300/7945

ANALYZER READINGS DATE LAST CALIBRATED 28May2008 ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE GC/FID

First Triad Analysis (Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas T=Test Gas Se·cond Triad Analysis r =Correlation Coefficient) Calibration Curve PROPANE Date: 28May2008 Response Unit:AREA Z1 =0.00000 R1 = 252854.0 R2='252599.0 Z2=0,00000 Z3=0.00000 T3=101775.0 Avg. Concentration: 20.10 T1=101663.0 T2= 101846.0 R3

### = 252538.0 PPM Concentration""A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 r=.9999997 1668 Constants: B=1.96999E..04 o• A=4.82868E-02 c.,.1,31022E-12 E•

APPROVED

# BY:~.-,, -· 

# 0
..

.

### ~HN C. FTZ

·· ...__

## _.L'---·=~===P,.;ag;;.e===1,;o=f=1"'"""=================

# Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 1290 COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 248-589-213 

## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas
Customer Assay laboratory P.O. No.: PAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES 1290 COMBERMERE STREET TROY,MI 48083 Project No.: 05-43082-008 SUITE #1 0 21 06 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 ANALYTICAL INFORMATION This certification was performed according to EPA**T~_ay,!3;CJbi'!._itY.'J~(p~Q'cl?.J"ifpr**..**J-:._s.~ay** & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997.**·;··---:·";·.)·····>··---~** ·· · -'c'.··:-;
..... ,-_,. Cylinder Number: ALM013029

___;:,e,(;:•

### '<i'd~rtification Date:

### 1tM~y:ZQ06 Exp. Date: 16May2009 Cylinder Pressure•• ·•: 1**~-~ge,PSIG** 

# i:·•··-•·· ·•.,_,,,, .. '•':
. Ri:cuRAcv•• COMPONENT CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON MONOXIDE METHANE · ··"cERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) TRACEABILITY
PROPANE AIR**~:}** 9' 93

# 'k•c63 48c9s 

### 19:91 +1- 1o/o·'"' +/- 1%''' 

### +I- 1o/o 

### +I- 1o/o Direct NIST and NMi Direct NIST and NMi Direct NIST and NMi Direct NIST and NMi
***~-** * Do not use when cyllnde[_::·:pfessure is below 150 psig. ** Analytical accuracy is**bas~d:** ."on the requirements of EPA**P~Otoc_o! Procedu;~::.-·G'f;/S_~-Ptember**  REFERENCE STANDARI:f:} TYPE/SRM NO. EXPIRATION DATE NTRM 2300 NTRM 1679 NTRM 2750 NTRM 1667 01Jan2008 02Aprz,(;07 01Mar2007**04Ju!29~:~** INSTRUMENTATION

... INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# VAR!AN/3400/10693 HORIBA/A1A-220/57297601 VAR!AN/3400/7506 VAR!AN/3600/0455

ANALYZER READINGS
First Triad Analysis CARBON DIOXIDE Date: 04May2006 Response Unit:MV 1997, ·,_:f:,:;,: ,_, CYLINDER NUMBER •.

## ,,,citMS~~f~ATION ALM049142 \..;;/_:_··"::'<.}., •, ....,,·:;..**·:.~-~,::~:**.. 23.34 % ALM026128 :.:.::"**·:;.:,-.:;-:,'-,::r:~- :f\~1-90**  PPM ALM009178
.. ,. ·--t.>·:;:,:- ,-. 49'·80 PPM

### ALM01922~_./_:,··-·/ ·,

### --~~:::4;e:::?P~:,P,PM DATE

# LAS:;f~t!BRATED**04Ma"/2006~~[:** 

# .,_._:,.:_..

# ::·-~:-~~-A~.flQ**9b~~;-i~.:-**

- ·-·**;:-,;-g_J.fyl.~Y?9P 6** 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 = 1165579. T1 =50484.00 R2=1167434. 22=0.00000 T2=50233.00 Z_3=0.00000 T3=50126.00 R3=1165977. Avg. Concentration: 9933. PPM CARBON MONOXIDE Date: 08May2006 Response Unit:PPM Z1 =:0.00000 R1 ==105.0000 T1 =57.10000 R2=1 04.9000 22=0.00000 T2=57.10000 23=0.00000 T3=57.00000 R3=104.8000 Avg. Concentration: 50.81 PPM METHANE Date: 16May2006 Response Unlt:AREA Z1 =0.00000 R1 =3703708. T1 =376479.0 R2=3702348. 22==0.00000 T2=376799.0 Z3=0.00000 T3=376546.0 R3=3691508. Avg. Concentration: 48.98 PPM PROPANE Date: 09May2006 Response Unit:AREA Z1 =0.00000 R1 =51668.00 T1 =20604.00 R2=51663.00 22=0.00000 T2=20547.00 Z3=0.00000 T3=20588.00 R3=51621.00 Date: 15May2006 Response Unit: PPM 21 =0.00000 R1 =105.0000 T1 =57.00000 R2 = 104.9000 22=0.00000 T2=56.90000 Z3=0.00000 T3=56.90000 R3=105.2000 Avg. Concentration: 51.24 PPM ·-:)'" i/:_::\ COMPONEIIIi

## g~~:g~**~gM~:,oE** METHANE**}_;~r** PROPANE

. ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY NDIR TCD/F!D FLAME IONIZATION

:-;··Calibration Curve
Concentration ""A+Bx + Cx2 + Dx3+ Ex4 I =0,999999 Constants: 8=0.00002 D=O A =-0.012965**c~o E~o**  Concentration =A+Bx + Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 r""'0.999992 Constants: 8=0.870621 D=O A=0.661739 C=0.000317 E=O
Concentration ""'A +Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 r=0.999989 Constants: 8=0.000133 0=0**A=~1.545108** C=O E=O
Concentration =A+Bx + Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 r=0.999994 Constants:**8~0.000975** A=0.081195**c~o**

# Scott Specialty Gases 

# ® Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard
1290 COMBE;RMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 

## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas Assav laboratory SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES 1290 COMBERMERE STREET TROY,MI 48083
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION P.O. No.: PAL Project No.: 05-43082-008 Phone: 248-589-2950

Customet AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #1 0 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 Fax: 248-589-213

This certification was performed according to EPA**Tr_ac_~f.'!.?.iUW-'·~protOC(l).-.'·P?f:,-:_t\~say** & Certification Of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997. :**:---,·.'.(_-(::<:;_~p·'.·:·** ·· ··-: -···'**~,~/-':~·:/:** Cylinder Number: AlM013029 .•.

### ;+('i'· · Certification Date: 17Mav;?P06 Exp. Date: 16May2009 Cylinder Pressure***: 1
..

# :;?p;,;<PSIG
___**,'.:-:.<~·:·:<.** 

### :··:' >:"·_ •. , • · 

### ·:> ANALYZER READINGS 

## o> ·

-

## C'~-r~reJatiOn Coe'ff1c1ent) R Refef'ence Gas 

### ! "'".lest Gas

# ~rcond**Tri~d !1~.41}~{~** 



# ... ,w: First Triad Analysis Calibration Curve

Special Notes: REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 9 GAS MIX)

APPROVED BY:

# -1'1~~ \,\

# A'f!-WIAl.,!~**~W,~f\ib<lo/\**___ _

## ~~ffilR

# ·-_**~-**

# -_---_---s-_- --_ ..---._--.--.-- c·----- _ ..-----·- scott ·· :pectalty ·- ases A

1 

# liR**CIDNS~L**

# T 

# I'NG**~ ENG~I'NG**  

# CAS Reg
. Compone111't No
. 

# l•r;)w 

# ·ms··

# ·s,**'\'&;f!t~.~'** __

### '!:;_}

# '69.0~08~0'



# -.,w ·a,o-

# ·s·**r~**

## ..**~ ~~**  

## ,



# -

?4

..9.8•6 :**~** 

# 1'32259;..;li0"0- Compone111-t



# .**e~RB.GN, ffill\ffi~l\IDE**  

# -

CBRBffiN,iMONIDXmDE
.- 

### . . .

## MEmffi~NE. 

# PRIDPANE Rii:R 

# Ces:titi.cat_e.**-~f** 

# Accuracy

- .PO 

# No. 792?c36

.- 

# ee:rti·f

# ted

- amail:ys:i:& 5.011
. PPMv 

# S0il. PPMY 600.- 

# PPMt 200. PP.MV**B~L**

# ---------------------------------~-----------------------------------------~-*-- 

# Ame:'lig:s:its m.a1te 

# 28Mal20.0.8 Ama:l1gs:t' J.0MN C

. F'ITZ

_Eox1p!l\raM:.om ma\t:e 

# 28Mpg20ill 

# G.rade,**~RE~ERENeE** 

# ffii!!ASS

.

. '·

### .. 

# Procl.e.c:'i 

# Ne 0ll,-i8864:9**Cg:Li~mder** 

# t 

# AttM05.8.5.5.6 

# Ib.em No
. 

# 0il\02C5000l!!SmAL**~~~** 

# \\ .>::> 

## ---..,_

,-Q \)) 

# N

# ~

# REFERENCE CLASS 

# Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Certified Calibration Standard 6 I41 EAS I01\1 ROAD, BLDG I,PLO!VIS I EADVILLE,PA I**8949~0310** PhOne:**800~33** I**~4953** Fax: 215-/66-/226 

### CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard · Product Information Project No.: 01-49994-010 Item No.: 01 02C500282QAL P.O. No.: PAL Cylinder Number: ALM004892 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 15May2006 Expiration Date: 14May2009 

### CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION Component 

### Name CARBON DIOXIDE

### ~~~~~~tONOXIDE PROPANE AIR 

### TRACEABILITY

APPROVED BY:

Page 1 of 2 Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #1 0 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL 32606



### .**\,~\~::'Ac~unicy** 

# ( +

J,o/o) 1 1 1 1

Traceable To NIST GMIS, SRS

DATE:'''"" 

### SPECIFICATIONS

# ·.-~ i Requested**Gravim~tric** · Analyzed Concentration Concentration Concentration Comnonent Name (Moles) (Moles) (Moles) CARB9N DIOXIDE CARBON MONOXIDE MErnANll PROPANE AIR 

### TRACEABILITY Process Traceability Method 25,000. 9,000. 9,000. 3,000.

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Analytical Traceability Type/SRM No. GM!S 3 COMP GMIS 3 COMP CH4/N2 2.5% C3H8/N2 .33% Instrumentation
MTI/M200/1 MTI/M200/170927 MTI/M200/170927 MTI/M200/170927 Expiration Date 14Jun2006 14Jun2006 12Dec2007 23Ju12006



### PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL P!M 25,000. P!M 9,010. P!M 9,010. P!M 3,000.

Traceability To

NIST
Cylinder Number**A~M066991** ALM066991 A11789 KD11239

Date last Calibrated 01May2006 01May2006 15May2006 15May2006 P!M P!M P!M P!M 25,100. 9,030. 9,000. 2,990.

Concentration 16.00 % 7610. PPM 2.506 % ,3301. PPM P!M P!M P!M P!M

Analytical Principle GC-TCD GC-TCD GC-TCD GC-TCD
Pressure: Expiration Date: 2000 PSIG 14May2009 

### SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Blend Blend Process**A~alytic~f** Tolerance Accuracy Accuracy

Result Result Result (+/- %) 1+/- %) 1+/- %) .0 1.00 .1 1.00 .1 1.00 

### .o 1.00

Component CARBON DIOXIDE CA.RBON MONOXIDE METHANE PROPANE Analytical Method 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00**.~··** Do not use or store cylinder at c;>r below the**s~ated** dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. Use of calibration standards at or below dew 'point temperatUre may result in calibration error. 

### COMMENTS REF:TQ06-1227(1TEM 11 GAS MIX) DISCOUNT PER J.MUNLEY/D.HUDGEN ORIGINAL QUOTE @ $1600

/

Page 2 of 2**lnterl~cking** Result 1+/- %)

.40 .20 .10 .30

### ,,



### CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Product Information Project No.: 01-49994-004 Item No.: 01022713 QAL P.O. No.: PAL Cylinder Number: ALM026874 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 12May2006 Expiration Date: 11 May2009 

### CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION Component Name METHANE AIR 

### TRACEABILITY Description BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY ANALYTICAL TRACEABILiTY

APPROVED BY: 

# FERENCE CLASS ual-Certified Calibration Standard



### Reference Class Calibration Standard

Page 1 of 2 Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #10 21 06 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL 32606

:··.:A'h¢.l!racy



### (+!-%)

1

Traceable To NIST SRS

DATE:

### I 

# \ SPECIFICATIONS 

# (j_, Od

## (0 

# C

# fl;!) Requested Gravimetric Analyzed Concentration Concentration Concentration Comoonent Name MEmlANE AIR 

### TRACEABILITY Process Traceability Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Analytical Traceability Type/SRM No. CH4/N2 2.5% Instrumentation

'"' <</<"<.VW <!VOL! Expiration Date 12Dec2007



### PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL {Moles) {Moles) {Moles) 1. %

Traceability To

NIST LOO

Cylinder Number A117B9

Date Last Calibrated 12May2006 % 0.99

Concentration 2.506 % %

Analytical Principle GC-TCD
Pressure: Expiration Date: 1660 PSIG 11May2009 

### SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Blend Blend Process Tolerance Accuracy

Result Result {+/- %) {+/- %) .0 1.00

Component METHANE Analyticat**Ac~uracy** Result { +,_ %)

1.00

Analytical Method

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. Use of calibration standards at or below dew po!nt temperature may result in calibration error. 

### COMMENTS
- REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 4 GAS MIX) FLAM-OX RESTRICTION: -1670 PSIA

Page 2 of 2 Interlocking Result [+/- %)

1.00

## ,, 

# q170 Scott Specialty Gasetr----
6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1,PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 1B949-031 0 

## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas Assay Laboratory P.O. No.: PAL SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-49994-005 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 ANAlYTICAl INFORMATION\ 

## Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226

Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #10 21 06 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 This certification was performed according to EPA**·Iri,'I:9~8BiiitY'''Pi-btOC·8(··F6'rA::r.s<:~y** & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997. 1-::·:'}_'_:;···**.,.~:,i_·,,**

# g~::~~::**~~::::~•••: ~;~g~~~~2**  Certi.: .•

# i.ti§>iJDa~~i< •

# 08M~~~OQ~\•• ...... Exp. Date: 07May2009

······

## AN~ty:pCAL 

# ,.;{y·

# CERTIF~~;:tNCENTR,fi~~~~tl COMPONENT CARBON DIOXIDE AIR .<·.:>- ..

### ·,y\**<~:~- "·'"''·':,:~;}:~:**  *** Do not use when

## cylindia-:~ressure is below 150

## psig.·--·1:+~!::____**:··~~;:**__

## :·::~t;:·i~:·-... ** Analytical accuracy is**ba~El'd** on the requirements of EPA**PiO~oc·ol** ProcedUi'f,{_;_·:01:;·::·:s·eptember

NTRM 2622 INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERiAL# MTI/M200/170927

ANALYZER READINGS( First Triad Analysis CARBON DIOXIDE Qate: 08May2006 Response Unit:AREA Z1 =0.00000 R1 ""91499.00 R2=91647.00 Z2=0.00000**~3=0.00000** T3,46139.00 Avg. Concentration:**~970.**

Special Notes: T1 ""46100.00 T2=46088.00 A3=S1652.00

PPM ACCURACY** TRACEABILITY

1997. Direct NIST and· NMi

# COMPONE~~ CARBON D16$21DE ;-::;;"c.**:·.:{-~ '.';·.~·fj**  ;);/ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE

· Constants:

B=2.1775E-05 D• 2622 A=-6.1770E-03 C• E•

### SPECIFICATIONS 

# <f77P (O,t ReqUested etric Concentration Concentration Component Name CARBON DIOXIDE NITRCGEN 

### TRACEABILITY Process Traceability Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

### PHYSICAl PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL (Moles) 4. % BI\L

Traceability To

NIST (Moles) 4.00 % BI\L

Pressure: 201 5 PSIG Blend Tolerance

Result (+/· %) 

### .o

Expiration Date: 14May2008 

### SPECIAl HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Blend Process Accuracy

Result (+/· %)

1.00

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stateq dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 1 5 minutes to re-mix. Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error.

Page 2 of 2

# . g}l/ (]. 

# Scott Specialty Gases..____. 6141· EASION ROAD, BLDG !,PCUMSIEADVILLE,PA**18949~0310** 

# REFERENCE CLASS Dual-Certified Calibration Standard Phone:**800~331-4953** Fax; 215-166-/226 

### CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard Product Information Project No.: 01-49994-007 Item No.: 01 020000430QAL P.O. No.: PAL Cylinder Number: ALM006827 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 12May2006 Expiration Date: 11 May?OOS 

### CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION Component Name CARBON DIOXIDE AIR 

### TRACEABILITY Description BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY ANALYTICAL TRACEABILITY

APPROVED BY: 

### Qc::) 

# l}**~ ~** **~-** 

# -t**~** 

### \.)

I 

# <+> 

# cc:. Concentration (Moles)

50.1 PPM BALANCE Traceability Type WEIGHT GAS STANDARDS

Page 1 of 2 Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #1 0 21 06 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL 32606

Accuracy

(+/-%)

Traceable To NIST SRS

DATE:

### SPECIFICATIONS 

# 50r/ (0). Requested Grav1 Analyzed Concentration Concentration Concentration Component Name (Moles) (Moles) (Moles) CARBON DIOXIDE
. AIR 

### TRACEABILITY Process Traceability Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Analytical TraceabUity 50.

Type/SRM.No. C02/N2 .015% Expiration Date 21Jun2006 Instrumentation


### PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL PPM 50.1

Cylinder Number ALM031683

Date last Calibrated 12May2006 PPM 50.0

Concentration 150.0 PPM

CO/C02
Pressure: 2000 PSIG Expiration Date: 11 May2008 

### SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS PPM Blend Blend Process Analyticc-1 Tolerance AcCuracy Accuracy

Result Result Result (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/· %) .2 1.00 1.00

Analytical Method

Do not use or store cylinder

## ~t or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 1 5 minutes to re-mix. Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error. 

### COMMENTS REF:TQ06-1227 liTEM 8 GAS MIX} _Interlocking Result (+/- %) /"

.10



### r 

# . 

# '

# First Analytical Laboratories
ANALYSIS REPORT

Method 26A 

# Determination ofHydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid Project # 080609

Prepared for: Air Compliance Testing 5525 Canal Road Valley View, OH 44125

Reviewed and Approved by:
William H. Wadlin, Ph. D. Laboratory Manager July 11, 2008 Do not reproduce this report except in whole without thepermission of the laboratory.
1 of22

# First Analytical Laboratories CASE NARRATIVE Project #: 80704 Client: Air Compliance Testing Client Project ID: 080609 Samples: Report Date: 11-Jul-08

Twenty-five samples were submitted for determination ofhydrochloric acid and hydrofluoric acidby method 26A, one ofwhich was the field blank. Two audit samples were included with this project. The samples were received in good condition with no apparent leakage. Any remaining amounts ofthe samples will be retained by the laboratory for six months and then discarded. Preparation: No samplepreparationwas required. Aminimumdilution of20Xis required to preventcolumn saturationby the sulfate ion contributedby the 0.1 N sulfuric acid matrix. Analysis: HCl and HF were determined as chloride and fluoride respectively by Ion Chromatography with conductivity detection (IC). Results: The results are presented as total milligrams ofHCl and HF trapped in the whole solution. HCl was measurable in seven ofthe twenty-four field samples, and ranged fromjust above the detection limit of0.1 mg up to 5.8 mg. HF was found in only five ofthe twelve B series samples ranging from 0.5 mg to 2.3 mg. HF was found in all ofthe A series samples with levels from 5.5 mg to 335 mg. Quality Control: No HCl or HF were detected in the blank. All ofthe samples were analyzed in duplicate. The ending calibration was in good agreement with the initial calibration. The spike recoveries ranged from 97% to 100%, which is well within the normal range of75% to 125%. The results for the audit samples are shown on the calculation worksheet.
2 of22

# First Analytical Laboratories 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517



# ANALYSIS REPORT Tel. (9I9) 942-8607 FAJ( (919) 929-8688 www.frrstanalyticallabs.com



### Project#: 80704 Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Client Project ID: 080609 Report Date: 11 -Jul-08 Date Received: 08-Jul-08

Sample
080609A-8L-M26A 0806098- 1-KO 0806098-1-IMP1 0806098- 1-IMP2 0806098- 1-IMP3 0806098-2-KO 0806098-2-IMP1 0806098-2-IMP2 0806098-2-IMP3 0806098-3-KO 0806098-3-IMP1 0806098-3-IMP2 0806098-3-IMP3

Spike, % Recovery Total Milligrams in Sample HCI 

### mg


### < 0.8 

### < 0.3 

### < 0.4 

### < 0.3 

### < 0.2 

### < 0.5 

### < 0.4 

### < 0.3 

### < 0.1 

### < 0.4 0.7 0.4 

### < 0.1 

## HF mg


### < 0.8 1.7 0.5 

### < 0.3 

### < 0.2 2.1 

### < 0.4 

### < 0.3 

### < 0.1 2.3 0.7 

### < 0.4 

### < 0.1
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 100% 98%

3 of 22

# First Analytical Laboratories 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517



# ANALYSIS REPORT Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688 www.firstanalyticallabs.com



### Project 

### #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Jul-08 Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Date Received: Client Project ID: 080609
Total Milligrams in Sample Sample


### 080609A-1-KO 080609A-1-IMP1 080609A-1-IMP2 080609A-1-IMP3 080609A-2-KO 080609A-2-IMP1 080609A-2-IMP2 080609A-2-IMP3 080609A-3-KO 080609A-3-IMP1 080609A-3-IMP2 080609A-3-IMP3

Spike, % Recovery Spike, % Recovery HCI HF mg mg 

### 5.8 303 0.4 26.2 

### < 0.3 12.4 0.1 10.6 3.5 226 

### < 0.5 34.2 

### < 0.4 10.8 

### < 0.1 5.5 5.6 335 

### < 0.3 27.2 

### < 0.3 10.1 

### < 0.1 7.4
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

### 98% 99%

4 of22 

### 97% 100% 08-Jul-08

### CHLORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L Proj. #: 

### 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L Date: 10-Jul-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area 

### Factor mg mg/L ml as HCI 

### ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-8L-M26A 80704.8 0.02 408 0.37 20 

### < 0.82 0806098-1 -KO 80704.810 0.06 157 0.87 20 

### < 0.31 0806098-1-IMP1 80704.811 0.02 210 0.22 20 

### < 0.42 0806098-1-IMP2 80704.812 0.01 164 0.07 20 

### < 0.33 0806098-1-IMP3 80704.813 0.00 80 0.00 20 

### < 0.16 0806098-2-KO 80704.820 0.05 229 0.76 20 

### < 0.46 0806098-2-IMP1 80704.821 0.02 214 0.34 20 

### < 0.43 0806098-2-IMP2 80704.822 0.05 170 0.76 20 

### < 0.34 0806098-2-IMP3 80704.823 0.03 55 0.42 20 

### < 0.11 0806098-3-KO 80704.830 0.05 204 0.77 20 

### < 0.41 0806098-3-IMP1 80704.831 0.15 232 2.22 20 0.71 0806098-3-IMP2 80704.832 0.12 182 1.73 20 0.43 0806098-3-IMP3 80704.833 0.08 72 

### 1.18 20 

### < 0.14 080609A- 1-KO 80704.A10 0.19 303 2.80 100 5.81 080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 0.12 158 1.77 20 0.38 080609A-1-IMP2 80704.A12 0.06 170 0.86 20 

### < 0.34 Spike 80704.81OS 2.99 157 43.68 % Rec. = 

### 99.6% Spike 80704.A12S 2.95 170 43.13 % Rec. = 

### 98.4%
Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Cone. Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg/L mg/L ml of Cl Audits 

### M26A-3756-03 80704.L2728 9.61 500 140.35 40 7.47 M26A-3756-04 80704.L2752 9.60 500 140.28 40 7.47

5 of22

### CHLORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Proj. 

### #: 80704 Dale: 10-Jul-08 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Calibration Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression 

### Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 15.73 1.0 14.61 Standard 2 43.31 3.0 43.83 Standard 3 84.30 6.0 87.66 Standard 4 145.13 10.0 146.10 Standard 5 218.00 15.0 219.16 Standard 6 294.60 20.0 292.21 Regression Statistics RSquare 0.99971 Intercept 0 Standard Error 1.863 XVariable 14.61 Observations 7

6 of22

### FLUORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L Proj. 

### #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L Dale: 10-Jul-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HF 

### ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-BL-M26A 80704.8 0.00 408 0.00 20 

### < 0.82 080609B-1-KO 80704.B10 0.53 157 12.54 20 1.67 080609B-1-IMP1 80704.B11 0.12 210 2.84 20 0.51 080609B-1-IMP2 80704.B12 0.00 164 0.00 20 

### < 0.33 080609B-1-IMP3 80704.B13 0.00 80 0.00 20 

### < 0.16 080609B-2-KO 80704.620 0.46 229 10.70 20 2.08 080609B-2-IMP1 80704.B21 0.08 214 1.84 20 

### < 0.43 080609B-2-IMP2 80704.B22 0.00 170 0.00 20 

### < 0.34 080609B-2-IMP3 80704.B23 0.00 55 0.00 20 

### < 0.11 080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.56 204 13.11 20 2.27 080609B-3-IMP1 80704.B31 0.15 232 3.45 20 0.68 080609B-3-IMP2 80704.B32 0.08 182 1.78 20 

### < 0.36 080609B-3-IMP3 80704.B33 0.05 72 1'19 20 

### < 0.14 080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 10.00 303 235.10 100 302.9 080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 8.30 158 195.16 20 26.23 080609A-1-IMP2 80704.A12 3.66 170 86.03 20 12.44 Spike 80704.B1 OS 3.47 157 81.66 % Rec. = 98.0% Spike 80704.A12S 6.56 170 154.22 % Rec. = 96.7%

7of22

### FLUORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Clienl: Air Compliance Tesling, Inc. Proj. #: 

### 80704 Dale: 10-Jul-08 

### QUALITY CONTROL DATA Calibration Blank S!andard 1 Slandard 2 Slandard 3 S!andard 4 S!andard 5 Slandard 6 Regression Statistics RSquare Slandard Error Observalions Peak Area 0.00 23.55 69.08 137.30 242.22 351.53 469.01

0.99963 3.407 

### 7 True cone. ppm 0.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
lnlercepl XVariable

8 of22 0 

### 23.51 Regression 

### 0.00 23.51 70.54 141.09 235.15 352.72 470.30

### CHLORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L Proj. 

### #: 80704 Spike concentrn = 3.0 mg/L Date: 11-Jul-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HCI ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 0.13 29 1.92 20 0.08 080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 0.15 234 2.18 100 3.51 080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 0.05 253 0.78 20 

### < 0.51 080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 0.04 174 0.65 20 

### < 0.35 080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 0.06 66 0.89 20 

### < 0.13 080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 0.21 266 3.08 100 5.63 080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 0.06 162 0.87 20 

### < 0.32 080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 0.04 165 0.58 20 

### < 0.33 080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 0.08 72 1.20 20 

### < 0.14 Spike 80704.A21 S 2.97 157 43.21 % Rec. = 99.0%

QUALITY CONTROL DATA Calibration Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 15.81 1.0 14.55 Standard 2 43.43 3.0 43.64 Standard 3 84.10 6.0 87.28 Standard 4 144.36 10.0 145.46 Standard 5 217.14 15.0 218.19 Standard 6 293.18 20.0 290.92 Regression Statistics RSquare 0.99973 Intercept 0 Standard Error 1.786 XVariable 14.55 Observations 7



### 9 of 

### 22

### FLUORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

### Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L Proj. 

### #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L Date: 11-Jul-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area 

### Factor mg mg/L ml as HF ACID IMPINGERS 

### 080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 18.28 29 352.86 20 10.60 080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 9.66 234 186.40 100 226.0 080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 6.76 253 130.41 20 34.19 080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 3.11 174 60.00 20 10.82 080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 4.17 66 80.53 20 5.51 080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 12.61 266 243.36 100 335.4 080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 8.38 162 161.84 20 27.17 080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 3.07 165 59.29 20 10.14 080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 5.14 72 99.28 20 7.41 Spike 80704.A21 S 9.76 157 188.33 % Rec. = 

### 100.0%

QUALITY CONTROL DATA Calibration 

### Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression 

### Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 20.93 1.0 19.30 Standard 2 59.09 3.0 57.91 Standard 3 113.46 6.0 115.81 Standard 4 196.66 10.0 193.02 Standard 5 287.07 15.0 289.54 Standard 6 386.53 20.0 386.05 Regression Statistics 

### RSquare 0.99977 Intercept 0 Standard Error 2.203 XVariable 19.30 Observations 7

10 of22

## FirstAnalytical laboratories 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688 

# -8070it



# ch
. amo 

# fCus 0 

# y 

# t d R d ecor Samole# Run# Contnr. # Matrix"
0806098-1- M26AIKO 1 3**~so** ml 0.1 N H2S04/107 ml H20 0806098-1- M26AIIMP1 1 3 *100 ml 0.1 N H2S04/110 ml H20 0806098-1- M26AIIMP2 1 3 *100 ml 0.1N H2S04/64 ml H20 0806098 -1- M26AIIMP3 1 3 80 ml H20 0806098 -2- M26AIKO 2 3 •so mi0.1N H2S04/179 ml H20 0806098 -2- M26AIIMP1 2 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/114miH20 0806098 -2- M26AIIMP2 2 3 •100 ml 0.1N H2S04/70 ml H20 0806098 -2- M26AIIMP3 2 3 55 ml H20

0806098 -3- M26AIKO 3 3 *50 ml 0.1N H2S04/154 ml H20 0806098 -3- M26AIIMP1 3 3 *100 ml 0.1N H2S04/132 ml H20 0806098 -3- M26AIIMP2 3 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/82miH20 0806098 -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 ml H20**~** Represents total sample volume

Relinouished 8v: Date: Received 8v: 

## 1-l-.U 'tJ.-u 

# ·=tP7 f) Date 

# 7/ {:3

# /7.L>09.,

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. (Method 26A.xls-First Analytical Labs BH1) 717/2008 11 of22 Air Compliance Testing Project# : 080609 Date Shipped: 717/2008 PO# 423 Shipper: UPS Airbill#:
Page: 1 of 2
Comments Samples split to: Sampleswere not sPlit rior to shinment

The contents of each impinaer were recovered seoaratelv and should be analvzed and reoorted seoaratelv.

Analyze all samples for 

### (HCil and 

### (HF) as per section 11.1 EPA Method 26A
Notes: If questions contact: Rob Lisy 216.525.0900

### x 232 Tate Strickler 216.525.0900

### x 235

Job Number·:._----- Date:

____ _ Checked By:

____ _

## FirstAnalytical Laboratories 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688

## -8070~



# Cham of Custody Record Sample# Run # Contnr. # Matrix*
080609A -1- M26AIKO 1 3 

### ·so ml 0.1 N H2S04/253 ml H20 080609A -1· M26AIIMP1 1 3 *1 00 ml 0.1 N H2S04 I 58 ml H20 080609A -1- M26AIIMP2 1 3 *100 ml0.1NH2S04/70miH20 080609A -1- M26AIIMP3 1 3 29 ml H20 080609A -2- M26AIKO 2 3 ·so ml o.1N H2S04; 184 ml H20 080609A -2- M26AIIMP1 2 3 '"100 mi0.1NH2S04/153m!H20 080609A ·2- M26AIIMP2 2 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/74miH20 080609A -2- M26AIIMP3 2 3 66 ml H20 080609A -3· M26AIKO 3 3 *50 mi0.1NH2S04/216miH20 080609A -3- M26AIIMP1 3 3 *100 m!0.1NH2S04/62miH20 080609A -3· M26AIIMP2 3 3 "100 ml 0.1N H2S04/55 ml H20 080609A -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 ml H20

080609A -BL· M26A Blank 6 "200 ml 0.1 N H2S04 /208 ml H20

* Represents total sample volume

Relinouished By: Date: Received By:U.1' ••

### v~.c. 

### '

AirCompliance Testing, 

### Inc. 12 of

### 22 (Method 26A.xi&-First Analytical Labs BH1) 7f712008 Air Compliance Testing Project # : 080609 Date Shipped: 7f1/2008 PO# 423 Shipper: UPS Airbill#:
Page: 2 of 2

Comments Samples split to: Samples were not**spli~_prior** to shlp!llent

The contents ofeach impinger were recovered seoaratelv and should be analyzed and reported separately.

Analvze all samples for (HCI) and (HF) as per section 11.1 EPAMethod 26A
Notes: If questions contact: Rob Lisv 216.525.0900 

### x 232 Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 

### x 235

Job Number.:_----- Date:

____ _ Checked By:

____ _

### Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

# -8070it

Shipping/Transportation Container Number: 

# .---

Seaii.D. No. .Full Sjgrja\ure/. Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 0806098 - 1- M26N.Jil!"l1:"' 

## s**-~L£fi//V** 

### ff7£PG (j./f'Z- 200 ml 0.1N H2S04 I 

## 1<-0 B m1H20 

## s B 0806098 - 2 - M26AJ.II!11' 

## s At.; 

## ?ftl/<8**(~'Z-** 200m!0.1N H2S04 I

### ~ B m\H20 

## s B 0806098 - 3 • M26A/Jilt1'( 

## s**r~:4"tz_** 

## i""'. 

## 7/7t.JG 11>1.(.2- 200mi0.1N H2S04 I 

### K.JJ B m!H20 

## s B 

## s 200 ml 0.1N 0806098- 4 • M26NBH1 H2S04 I B m!H20 

## s B 

## s 200m! 0.1N 0806098- BL • M26NBH1 H2S04 I B m!H20 

## s B 

## s B 

## s B 

## s B

were all seals intact?

__ Yes

__ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were all liquid levels at markad levels?

__ Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received 

### By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. (Method 26A.xls--Sample Record of Custody BH1) 7f1/2008 13of22

### Method M26A Custody



# - Shippingffransportation Container Number:.

______ _

Seaii.D. no. AN fuH,Signature Date Time 0806098 - 1 - M26NKO
0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP1 8 

### 0\,. l 0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP2 

## s . 

# :.JIJ**d~** 0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP3 

## s 

# 41. .f. d V1
0806098 - 2 • M26NKO
0806098 - 2 - M26NIMP1 0806098 - 2 • M26NIMP2 

## ' 0806098 - 2 - M26NIMP3

0806098 - 3 • M26NKO 

## ·rt 0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP1

### !~~**.~:JO** 0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP2

### llo/UlJ~ 

# 1 B:vO 

# a nJ J' It 

## • 0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP3 8 \.

0806098 - 8L- M26A 

## s 8 - Were all seals intact?_Yes

__ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

# -80704

Reason for Breaking Final Vol. Seal ml



# {Q6 'f



# 0D 21.1 Filter Number

Were aU liquid levels at marked levels?

__ Yes

___ .No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. (Method CTM027 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xls-Custody) 7/2/2008 14 of22 Job

# Number:~~!!!. • . Date: Checked By: ·

### Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

# -8070-\
Shipping/Transportation Container Number:

Seaii.D. No. Full Sianature Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 080609A- 1 -

### M26N~ 

## s**'2~./CZ-v**

## -tb~"' 

## t1"<- 

## I 200 ml 0.1N H2S04 I B mtH20 

## s B 080609A- 2 -

### M26~ 

## s**}~.** 

## 1/7/;:;6 rJ.<11 200mi0.1N H2S04 I B miH20 

## s B 

### :LL 

### I 

## 7(/(t b**U<~l** 080609A • 3-**M26N~** 

## s 200 mt 0.1N H2S04 I -11 b) B miH20 

## s B 080609A- 4- M26NBH1 

## s 200m! o.1N H2S04 I B miH20 

## s B 080609A- BL- M26NBH1 

## s 200 ml 0.1N H2S04 I B m1H20 

## s B 

## s B 

## s B 

## s B Were all seals intact?

__ Yes

__ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were all liquid levels at marked levels?

__ Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. (Method 26A.xls-Sample Record ofCustody BH 1 ) 1{7/2008 

### 15 of

### 22 Job

## Number:~ Done By I Date:**~I** ;J'!> Final Check By I Date: 

### "12 I 

### 'l<i

### Method M26A Custody

Shipping/Transportation Container Number:

______ _

Seaii.D. no. 

## !lJ .Fui!Signature Date Time 080609A - 1 - M26AIKO
080609A -1- M26A/IMP1 

## s 

# cr; 1 IJ.

### ~'WI~ 

# rnof:. a lfl•' 

## I , , 080609A - 1 - M26AIIMP2
080609A - 1 - M26AIIMP3 

## s 

## rLK " B 

### /l 

### 1/ I 080609A - 2 - M26A!KO II-; 

### {t('f@[tf) ll:; 

# V'J?. I3o 

### 7 080609A - 2 - M26A!IMP1 

## rl I 

## r; 080609A - 2 - M26A/IMP2 

# -80704

Reason for Breaking Final VoL Seal ml



## L)o Filter Number



## s' 

## 'P I) 

### I 

## Ill-{ 080609A -2- M26AIIMP3

080609A - 3 - M26A!KO
080609A - 3- M26AIIMP1 080609A - 3 - M26AIIMP2 

## s 

# :t Y1 I I 080609A - 3 - M26AIIMP3

OB0609A
- BL - M26A 

## s f(

# M j/ 'YI B " I
Were all· seals intact?_Yes

__ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were all liquid levels at marked levels?

__ Yes

__ ,No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. (Method CTM027 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.x!s..Custody) 7/2/2008 

### 16 of

### 22 

# 7'L

Job Number:

# ~Jt Date: · Checked By: 

### 'Er

# ISHIP TO: MIKE BARRY (919) 942-8607 

## FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

## CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

# UPS NEXT DAY AIR TRACKING#: 1Z FRS 740 014083 7262 

# 1

IBILLING: PIP

W$ 10.0.47 Canon IP1700 78.0A 0412008 Fold here em! place in Iobei pouch

17 of22

# IFROM: TATE STRICKLER ' (216) 525-0900 235

AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 5525 CANAL RD CLEVELAND OH 44125 

# -8070't 

# I i 

## SHIP TO: 

# I MIKE BARRY (919) 942-8607 

## FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

## CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 !

# UPS NEXT DAY AIR TRACKING#: 1Z FR8 740 01 4024 5053 

# 1**---------------------------------------------~-------------** REF 1:080609 BILLING: P/P



# I WS 10.0.47 CeiiQn iP110078.0A OU2008 L
..----------------------------------------------------'---------------·------------------------------------- Fotd here and place in tabel pouch

18 of22www.erg.com 

### June 17, 2008 Requestor: Bryon Richwine PA Dept. ofEnvironmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Quality 2575 Interstate Drive Harrisburg, PA 17101 717-346-8252 Dear Bryon Richwine: 

### Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide youwith two 

### ampules ofthe following audit materials for a Method 26A HCI audit; Numbers M26A3756-03 and -04. 

### These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plaut iu Summerville, PA 

### and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner ofGlen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plantin Summerville, PA 

### peryour automated database 

### request. Please note: requests for Method 26A are now filled separately from requests for Method 26 and that there are NEWInstructions associated with these samples, 

### effective October 2003. Method26A request M26A-3756-03: 

### -one Method 26A HCI sample; 

### Sample No. L- 2728 request M26A-3756-04: 

### -one Method 26A HCI sample; 

### Sample No. L- 2752 

### Please note that each sample is individually labeled and shipped with an instruction sheet with the format for reporting the laboratory auditresults. All results are to be reported to the internet automated computerized database. 

### You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit samples along with the designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample according to the specifications ofthe Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit results are to bereported to you, the requestor, by the analyst, using the Reporting Form, in the units specified in the instructions. You then will use the automated database 

### to enter the results into the SSAP database. We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit Program. Ifyou have any questions regarding the samples, please contact either Thomas Mckenzie at (919) 468-7920 or myselfat (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. Sincerely,

Rick Lafleur CC: sent with samples

601 Keystone Park 01·ive. Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 2.7560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919) 468-7803

• Arlington.VA o Atlanta, GA • Austin, IX • Boston, MA o Chantilly, VA o Cincinnati, OH o Hershey, PA • Kansas City. KS o Lexington, MA • Nashua. NH • Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC " Sacramento, CA Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Papc<·

## NSTRUCTIONSFORTHEPREPARATIONANDANALYSIS OFMElliOD26AAUDITSOLUTION 

# -80704

N!!El 

### This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous sampl referred to as the acid sample or**eydrg_g_~n** 

### halide_s fracti!lll. There is no filter included witt the audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No.4 a.Uillli!!e sample o**hal.l!g.e.nu~ilm.** 

### lrhe ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL ofan aqueous mixture ofwater that is**~piked**

### with alow concentrationofchloride. I)Wrapapapertowel aroundthe ampule, and withthe ampule inthe uprightposition, breakoffthe op atthepre-scored markbycarefully exertingpressure sideways.**~)Pipette**

### exactly 1 OmLof the audit samplefrom theampule into a500mLvolumetricflask. Dilut< exactlyto the 500 mLmark withDI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 3) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with theprocedures in Section 11.1 ofMethod 26A (N<lte; 

### The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within the**~alibrationrange** 

### ofthe analytical instrument. Thisdecision is left to the analyst.)**~)Calculate** 

### the concentrationofchloride inthe Diluted Sample in mg/L. 5)RecordthechlorideconcentrationintheDilutedSampleonthe enclosedReporting Formintmit pfmg/L. 6) Report the Method 26Achlorideconcentration, in theDilutedSample onthe Reporting Form othe designated agent.

Revised 10103 19of22

## Method 26A Audit Material (CI· Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-03/L2728 Date Issued:


### Auditee: Company: 

# .. 80704

06/17/08



## I (

# '2-& g\

....rn't'\J lr-.ee 

# Vc·**Cflt1~(t-** HS1-L ;2 

## 7§17 

# B· {j.l""

# j f

# Yo Phone: 

# 4J

# '1 

# 'f'f2..

# ~{p()

# 7 Address: Attention of: 

### Requestor: Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Qualtiy Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

### Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

### Audit Results (Results 

### In mg/L) Analyte Result Chloride concentration 

# 7.47

Revised 10/03 20 of22

## NSTRUCTIONSFORTHEPREPARATIONAND ANALYSIS OFMETHOD26AAUDITSOLUTION
t'fu_w_; 

### This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 

### aqueous sampl referred to as the acid sample orbsdf_p_gen balioos fmrthm. There is no filter included with he audit solution, and there is 

### no auditsolution for the Container No. 4 

### alkllJine. sample o hJllo_geDu.ampkfmmou.
The ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL 

### ofan aqueous mixture ofwater that is spikedwith alow concentration ofchloride. I)Wrapapapertowel aroundthe ampule, and with the ampule inthe uprightposition, breakoffthe op at thepre-scored mark by carefully exertingpressure sideways. 2)Pipetteexactly 10mL

### of the audit samplefrom theampule into a500 mL

### volumetricflask. Dilute exactly to the 500 mL

### mark withDI waterand mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 3) Analyzethe Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 11.1 ofMethod 26A 

## (t'fu.te.: The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within the calibrationrange ofthe analytical instrument. This decision is left to the analyst.) 4) Calculate the concentrationofchloride in 

### the Diluted Sample in mg!L. 5)Recordthechlorideconcentrationin

### theDilutedSampleonthe enclosed

### Reporting Form in

### unit bfmg!L. 6) Reportthe Method 26Achloride concentration, in 

### theDiluted Sample on the 

### Reporting Form othe designated agent.

Revised 10103 

### 21 of 

### 22

### Method 26A Audit Material (CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

### REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-04/L2752 Date Issued:


### Auditee: Company: Address: Attention of: 

### Requestor: Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Qualtiy Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention ob.
.. Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

### Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

### Audit Results (Results in mg/L) Analyte Result Chloride concentration 

# 7.11

22 of 22 06/17/08

Revised 10!03www.erg.com 

### June 17, 2008 Requestor: Bryon Richwine PA Dept. ofEnvironmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Quality 2575 Interstate Drive Harrisburg, PA 17101 717-346-8252 Dear Bryon Richwine: Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed bythe U.S. EPA to provide you with ampules ofaudit materials for a Method 08 audit pair; Audit Numbers M08-3756-01a and

- 01b. These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Gleu-Gery Corp., Hanley Plaut iu Summerville, PA and are being sent directly to Michael Rixuer ofGleu-Gery Corp., Hanley Plaut in Summerville, PA peryour automated database request.
Method 08 Sulfur Dioxide: request M08-3756-01a: one each Sulfuric Dioxide audit sample; Sample No. G- 0523 Method 08 Sulfuric Acid Mist: request M08-3756-01b: -one each Sulfuric acid mist audit sample; Sample No. H- 0895 Please note that each sample is shipped with an instruction sheet and a data form for listing the analytical audit information. All results are to be reported by the requestor to the internet automated computerized database. You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit sample along with the designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample according to the specifications ofthe Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit results are to bereported to you, the requestor in the units specified in the instructions. You then will use the automated database to enter the results into the SSAP database. We would like to thankyou for yourparticipation in the Stationary Source Audit Program. Ifyou have any questions concerning the audit, please contact eitherThomas Mckenzie (919) 468-7920 or myselfat (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. Sincerely,

# 12-~ Rick Lafleur CC: sent with audit samples

601 Keystone Pat-k Drive, Suite 700. Morrisville, NC 27560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919) 468-7803

• Arlington,VA • Atlanta. GA • Austin, TX • Boston, MA • Chantilly. VA • Cincinnati. OH • Hershey, PA • Kansas City, KS • Lexington. MA • Nashua, NH • Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC • Sacramento. CA Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper

## Method 8 Audit Material (Sulfuric acid mist Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory Request Number/Sample Number: MOB-3756-01 b/H0895 Date Issued: 06/17/08


### Auditee: Company: Address: Attention of: 

### Requestor: Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Qualtiy Address: 2575 lnterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

### Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

### Audit Results (Results in mg H2

### S04 / dscm) Analyte Result Sulfuric acid mist

Revised 8/21/02

## Method 8 Audit Material (Sulfur Dioxide Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01 a/G0523 Date Issued: 06/17/08



### Auditee: Company: Address: 

## ' / 

# Po @,me- 4-1!<26,

# c4/~L-narf,**oH~** 44/4- I i Attention of: 

# 7ct!urrJ 

### .C.fp 'II< 

## hs Phone: 

# 2 It-**.5.2~-** 

# o1o 0 

### Requestor: Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau ofAir Qualtiy Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

### Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

### Audit Results (Results in mg S02 / dscm) Analyte Result Sulfur Dioxide

Revised 8/21/02TEST DATA DETAILED RESULTS 

## H?so. Hoags N = Normality of barium perchlorate titrant Ba(CI04)2 for H2S04, (meq/ml) 0.00998 Vt =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 titrant used for the H2S04 sample, (ml) 66.80 Vtb =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 used for H2S04 Blank, (ml) 0.0500 Vsoln =Total Volume of H2S04 Containing Solution (1000 ml's), (ml) - 250.0 

## I Va =Volume of H2S04 sample aliquot titrated (1 0 ml's), (ml) 100.0 

# I H2S04 Concentrations



## so? Sulfuric Acid Concentration, (mg/dscm)

N

# = Normality of barium perchlorate titrant Ba(CI04)2 for S02, (meq/ml)

## I VI= Volume of Ba(CI04)2 titrant used for the S02 sample, (ml Vtb =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 used for S02 Blank, (ml Vsoln =Total Volume ofS02 Containing Solution (1000 ml's), (ml Va =Volume of S02 sample aliquot titrated (10 ml's), (ml) ) ) ) S02 Concentrations Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, (mg/dscm)

Test Date: Page 1 81.7

G0523 0.00998 i**--~----** 12.35 I 0.0500 1000.0 10.0
393.2

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. -Compliance Stack Emission Test Report
TEST DATA Number ofTest Runs 3 Traverse Points[_

___**~** )I--- ) 

### •. Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in Pilot Tube Coefficient (Cp Barometric Pressure at Ground Level (Pbar) (in Hg Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) ) -· ) ) ) 

### .•.. ) ) ) Run 1 41.80 41.70

0.84 28.90 20.00 28.00 681.395 741.830 0.9988



### - 2.016**-~~· '"""~~**  Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@ Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min Volume ofWater Vapor Condensed in the !mpingers (g Weight ofWater Vapor Co!!ected in Silica Gel (g)

# ____ )**~~** {o6.5- ) 12.2


### ..

Average Pita! Rotation Angle Port Number 1E·- 

## 2.2j Port Number 2
____ 6.:§ Run

## 2 Run 3 

### ..• 41.80 4i:So 41.70 41.70**~~-·~**

0.84 ···o.a4 28.80 28.83 20.0.()_ 20.00 28.00 ·-··---- 28.00 742.563i 804.668 804.344 866.270

0.9988 0.9988

-**2,p1_~** • 2,016 90 90 103.5 107.2 13.9 12.4 "··-·

Test Run Start Time (hrmin)l 12:231-**---·-·-··~~-----,1ie9f':4;c8~~** Test Run Stop Time (hrmin)**---~·--14:~9. 18~**  21:33.
DETAILED RESULTS Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 9.507 9.507 9.507 Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 28.87 28.77 28.80 Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mo!e) 28.84 28.82 28.83 Wet Molecular Weight ofStack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 27.85 27.85 27.85

Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 28.86 28.76 28.79 ·Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H20) -0.11 ·0.19 -0.18 Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 373.8 377.4 376.2 Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (0 R) 833.8 837.4 836.2

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ftlsec) 53.89 53.44 53.73 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 3,233 3,206 3,224 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 30,739 30.481 30,647 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 18,779 18,472 18,620 Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) {dscfm) 17,064 16,814 16,933 Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas ('%H20) 9.13 8.98 9.06 Test Results Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) {dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.619 0.624 0.629 Predicted**1~Hour** Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 37.125 37.421 37.738 Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd)**(1~bw/100)** 0.909 0.910 0.909

Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H20) 0.5442 0.5317 0.5383 Average Square Root of Delta P 0.7369 0.7277 0.7326 Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H20) 1.4733 1.5792 1.6333 Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 94.500 100.583 94.917 Average Dry Gas MeterTemperature (Tm) CR) 554.500 560.583 554.917 Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) {acf) 60.435 61.781 61.602 Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9969 1.0171 1.0313 Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference(%) 0.19 -1.83 ·3.25 SAMPLING QA Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 Current Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK

Probe Nozzle Diameter (in)(

__ o.2s3r-·--·· 0.2521 0.253] Percent !sokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 98.7 101.8 101.1 In Field lsokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD Count ofVelocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H20 0 0 0 Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.005 1.005 1.005

Is Meter Box ManometerAdequate (Yes I No) ? YES YES YES Average 41.80 41.70

0.84 28.84 20.00 28.00
0.9988

2.016 90 105.7 12.8 1.00 16.78 82.22

Average 9.507 28.82 28.83 27.85 28.80

-0.16 375.8 835.8 53.68 3,221 30,622 18,624 16,937

9.06
56.142 0.624 37.428 0.909 0.5381 0.7324 1.5619 96.667 556.667 61.273 1.0151 -1.63
0.020
0.253 100.6
0 1.005 Glen Gery Ceric Kiln Uncontrolled

Inlet Duct

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, fnc. • 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS


### Run Pitot Delta Point Time 

### P (in Count Run# (min) 

### H20) -·-·· 

### 1 1 0 0.62 2 1 7.5 0.64 ·--· 

### 3 1 4 1 15

### ~Q·~~**~-** 

### 22.5 0.54 --·· 

### 5 1 30 0.51 6 1 37.5 0.48 7 1 8 1 45**o.~_g -~2.5**  

### 0.57 9 1 60 0.51**-~** 

### 10 1 11 1 67.5

## ---~~ 75 0.51



## -- 12 1 82.5 0.46 -···· 

### 13 2 0 0.46 14 2 7.5 0.6 15 2 16 2 15 

### ····---=-=

## ·--~~ 22.5 0.53 17 2 18 2 19 2 30 0.49 

### --;;;c··;:-;; 0.4y 37.5

45 0.5**---~** 

### 20 2 52.5 0.65 21 2 60 0.55 22 2
__67,5 0.52 23 2 75 0.53**-~** 

### 24 2 25 3 82.5

## -~ - 

### 0 0.58 •. 

### 26 3 7.5 0.61 --···· 

### 27 3 15 0.53 28 3 22.5 0.49 29 3 30**·~···~** 

### 0.48**-~··** 

### 30 3 37.5 0.49 31 3 45 0.55 32 3 52.5 .**··~--;;-;;:** 

### 0.6

- 

### 33 3 60 0.57 34 3 35 3 36 3 ! 

### 67.5 0.63 

## I

# -·~:.-~t-- 0.49 0.44

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 

### Square Root of Delta P



### 0.787 0.800 0.762 0.735 0.714 0.693 0.748 0.755 0.714 0.742 0.714 0.678 0.678 0.775 0.806 0.728 0.700 0.686 0.707 0.806 0.742 0.721 0.728 0.656 0.762 0.781 0.728 0.700 0.693 0.700 0.742 0.775 0.755 0.794 0.700 0.663 Orifice Delta H (in 

### H20) DGM Temp OUT ('F)

·-··- 

### 1.67 89

··-·- 

### 1.73 91

### -~'57 93 1.46 94 1.38 94

1.3 95 1.51 94 1.57 95 1.38 96 97

### -~~-9.. 98 1.38

... 

### 1.24 98**·----~** 

### 1.25 98 1.62 99 

## _.1:!.7. 101 1.44 102 1.33 103 _1.36 103 1.6 98

- 

### 2.08 100 •. 

### 1.76 100



### - 1.66 101

1.7 101

_____1.38 101 1.6 95

·- 

### 1.7 96 --· 

### 1.5 97 1.4· 97 

### -· 1.3 96



### --·- 1.4 96

- 

### 1.7 93 

### -· 1.9 94
" ----- 

### 1.9 94**·---~--** 

### 2.1 94 1.6 94 1.5 93**----~----**



### Page 2 Stack Pressure Stack (in H20) Temp 

### ('F)

------ 

### -0.121 375 -0.12 369

.. 

### -0.12 375 -0.1 366 -0.1 373 -0.1 365

. 

### -0.1 379 -0.16**·----~** 

### 374 -0.1 380

... 

### 374 -0.11 -0.14 

### -----:.;;-: 381 -0.1 374 -0.29 376 -0.24 376 

### ---.

-0.14 372**~-·-----~·-** 

### -0.19 380

- 

### -0.17 374 -0.16 380 -0.29 

### -----;,-;;- 386 -0.15 378 -0.19 368 -0.18 379 -0.18 384

. 

### -0.1 376

... 

### -0.31, 349 -0.23 379 -0.24 385

. 

### -0.17 379 -0.14**·---~** 

### 384 -0.18 377 -0.17 381 -0.16 375 -0.14 381 -0.12 352**-~~-**

.

# --~:~1~=--~;~ Glen Gery Ceric Kiln Uncontrolled Inlet Duct

AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report TEST DATA Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Particulate Weight in Probe Rinse

## (mg)rj----"1""7"'.4'"'0~1- 10.30j 17.80[ Particulate Weight in Filter Catch (mg)l 66.00[ 75.60[ 109.701
DETAILED RESULTS Run 1 Run2 Run 3 Emission Results Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.381 3.404 5.045 Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf) 0.0231 0.0236 0.0348 Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate at MDL (lb/hr) 0.168 0.164 0.164 Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration at MDL (grains/dscf) 0.001 0.001 0.001 Glen Gery Ceric Kiln Uncontrolled Inlet Duct Average 15.17 83.77

Average
3.943 0.0272

0.166 0.001

Test Date: 6/24/2008-612512008 Page 3 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. · 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report
TEST DATA OETAILED RESULTS
Emission Results:

LAB RESULTS HCL Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) Emission Rate (lb/hr) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate {lb/hr) Run 1 0.268 14.275 Run 2 0.178 10.957 Run 3 0.255 15.042
Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Stack Gas Concentration

LAB RESULTS HF HCI Volume of lmpinqer 1 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) 3160**f--~;::50~62:0:-1----if:.~Cj** HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg Cl- 1L)**f---~0.~1;o20:<+** 0.100**+---~~**

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX} (mg Cl- I L) c_ __**,o.~o~oo:!-L---"'o.;o.oo~o!-.L_** HCI Mass in lmpinger 1 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 0.38 0.51 HCI Volume of Jmpinger 2 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) l---i.3S4;,oo:C·-1+·-·-_·_·_·**,;~:'cj---,C';';e:'cj** HC! Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg C!-1 L) 0.100

HCI Concentration of Blank (B>r) (mg C!- 1L)

# ---o.ao·o HCI Mass in !mpinger 2 sample, (mHC!) (mg) 0.34 580.0
____**11_~~~~** HCI Volume of lmpinqer 3 Sample (VsHC!)**(ml)f---~~l** HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg Cl- I L)**f--- ~f---~~f---~~** 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg Cl- I L)**'---..O:C~'----7'~'----7'~** HC! Mass in lmpinger 3 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.13 HC! Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) HCI Collection Efficiency(%)
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) HCI Concentration, dry basis (ConcHC!) (mg/dscm) HCI Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F HCI Concentration (ppmvw) Wet@ 68F 6.60 98.86
1.577 4.19 2.762 2.510 4.50 6.43 100.00 100.00
1.589 1.603 2.83 4.01 1.866 2.647 1.699 2.407
Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
HFVolume of Knock Out Sample {VsHF) (ml) 30300 23400 26600 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg F- I L)**·-·-·-----~-_997** 9.658 12.610

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg F- 1L) 0.000**···---~00** 0.000 ·---· ..·-- HF Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHF) {mg) 302.90 226.00 335.43 HF Volume of lmpinger 1 Sample (VsHF) (ml) HF Concentration of Sample, {SX-) (mg F- I L) 8.300

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg**~I** L)

_____ 

### g.ooo HF Mass in lmpinger 1 sample, (mHF) (mg) 26.23 34.19 HF Volume of !mpinger 2 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 3400 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX-) {mg F- I L)

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg F-/ L) 0.000 HF Mass in lmpinger 2 sample, {mHF) (mg) 12.44 HF Volume of lmpinqer 3 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 580.0 1320.0 1440.0 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX=) (mg F= I L) 1 ___**·~-_!-~.28**__ _ _____ §.1. HF Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg F I L)

___Q:_QQ_ 0.00 HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) {mg) 10.60 7.41 HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 352.17 276.52 380.14 HCI Collection Efficiency(%) 96.99 98.01 98.05 Stack Gas Concentration HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 223.33 173.97 237.15 HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry@ 68F 268.516 209.166 285.132 HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet@ 68F 243.994 190.390 259.300 Glen Gery Celie Kiln Uncontrolled

Inlet Duel

Average 0.233 13.425
Average 26766.667 0.185 0.000
3820.000 0.107 0.000
3393.333 0.100 0.000
1113.3 0.1 0.00 0.12

1.590 3.68 2.425 2.205
Average
26766.667 10.755 0.000
3820.000 7.814 0.000
3393.333 3.281 0.000
1113.3 9.2 0.00 7.84

211.48 254.271 231.228

Test Date: 6124/2008- 6!25!2008 Page4 AirCompliance Testing, fnc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and Sample Calculations
Constants co,F.,= 44.o 0 2

Fwt= 32.0 CON2Fwt= 28.0

H20Fwt= 18.0 Stack Variables Cp = Pbar= Ebox = Esam = y= 0= VIc= %C02=

%02= %CO= %N2=

A= Pg = Tsavg = SQ6.Pavg = <>H = Tm = Vm= Dn= Run No.- 1

in wg= 0.073529 N02Fwt= 46.01 COF.,= 28.01 H2S04Fw1= 98.08 Tstd= 528 HCIF.,= 36.46 S02Fwt= 64.06 HF F.,= 20.01 gr= 0.000142857 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu

CF.,= 12.011 Pstd= 29.92

0.84 28.90 in. Hg 20 ft 28ft 0.9988

90.0 min 118.7 g 1.00% 17.00% 0.00% 82.00% 9.5069 ft2**~0.11** in. H20 833.75 R

0.74 in. wg 1.47 in. wg 554.50 R

60.44 ft:,i 0.253 in. pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless) barometric pressure elevation difference between ground level and meter box elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless) net run time (minutes) total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) percent C0 2 by volume (dry basis) {dimensionless) percent 0 2by volume {dry basis) (dimensionless) percent CO by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) percent N2by volume (dry basis) {dimensionless) stack**cross~sectionaf** area flue gas static pressure average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg QF) average square root 6.P average pressure differential of orifice meter dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) sampling nozzle diameter Calculated Stack Variables

Barometric pressure at sampling location NOTE: Barome!rfc pressure recorded at ground level Psam =**Pbar~** [{**Es~m/100ft}*** 0.1 in. Hg] P,.m = 28.90 · ( ( 28.0/100) • 0.1)
Psem = 28.87 in. Hg Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf) Vmsld = y*Vm * [**Pbar~** ( [ ( Eboxf100ft) *0.1 in. Hg] + (6.H/13.6)) /Pstdl * (Tmd/Tm) Glen Gery CericKIIn Uncontrolled

Inlet Duct

Vm"d = 0.9988 • 60.435 • ( ( 28.90 · ( ( 20.0/100) • 0.1 ) + ( 1.4733/13.6) ) /29.92) • ( 528.0/554.500) Vmstd = 55.688 ft' Volume ofwater vapor at standard conditions (68 oF, scf) Vwstd = ( 0.04715 ft:5/g) *VIc Vwstd= (0.04715*118.7) Ywstd = 5.6 ft'

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 Page 5 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609