alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


            We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-95007, Form S-8 No. 333-40466, Form S-8 No.
333-69722, Form S-8 No. 333-76636, Form S-8 No. 333-91276, Form S-8 No.
333-106436, and Form S-8 No. 333-106946) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan, 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 2001 Non-Statutory Stock Option
Plan and the Acquisition Equity Incentive Plan of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.
and in the Registration Statement (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 on
Form S-3 No. 333-45942) of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Caliper Life Sciences,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2003.


/s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 11, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nile Therapeutics, Inc.
(the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date
March 3, 2010





/s/ Joshua
      KazamJoshua
      KazamTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

          (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Date: November 9, 2005 | /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos |
|------------------------|-----------------------|
|                   |                       |
|                   | A.L. Giannopoulos     |
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2210 

AN ACT 

To designate the community living center of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs in Butler Township, Butler County, 

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Sergeant Joseph George Kusick 

VA Community Living Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2210 EH

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) Sergeant Joseph George Kusick of Bruin, 

4 Pennsylvania, was assigned to the command and 

5 control detachment of the 5th Special Forces Group 

6 (Airborne) of the Army during the Vietnam War. 

7 (2) On November 8, 1967, Kusick distinguished 

8 himself by exceptionally valorous actions while serv9 ing as a radio operator of a special forces reconnais10 sance team on a combat mission deep in hostile ter11 ritory. 

12 (3) During an enemy ambush, Kusick, though 

13 seriously wounded, refused aid and radioed the for14 ward air controller to advise him of the critical situ15 ation. 

16 (4) While the team leader led a withdrawal to 

17 a landing zone, Kusick maintained contact with the 

18 controller and requested emergency extraction. 

19 (5) Realizing the importance of having a radio 

20 operator on the ground to direct landings, Kusick 

21 refused evacuation by the first helicopter. 

22 (6) After the second helicopter was shot down, 

23 and in the midst of enemy fire, Kusick continued to 

24 maintain radio contact and called for a hoist extrac25 tion of the men still remaining on the ground. 
3 

•HR 2210 EH

1 (7) The last helicopter, which Kusick boarded, 

2 was shot down by intense Viet Cong fire and crashed 

3 in flames, resulting in Kusick’s death. 

4 (8) On December 22, 1967, Kusick was post5 humously awarded the Silver Star Medal for gal6 lantry in action. 

7 (9) The citation to accompany the award of the 

8 Silver Star Medal stated that ‘‘Kusick’s gallantry in 

9 action, at the cost of his life, was in keeping with 

10 the highest traditions of the military service and re11 flects great credit upon himself, his unit, and the 

12 United States Army’’. 

13 SEC. 2. SERGEANT JOSEPH GEORGE KUSICK VA COMMU14 NITY LIVING CENTER. 

15 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community living center of 

16 the Department of Veterans Affairs in Butler Township, 

17 Butler County, Pennsylvania, shall after the date of the 

18 enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 

19 ‘‘Sergeant Joseph George Kusick VA Community Living 

20 Center’’. 

21 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula22 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

23 States to the community living center referred to in sub24 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ser-
4 

•HR 2210 EH

1 geant Joseph George Kusick VA Community Living Cen2 ter’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2210 

AN ACT 

To designate the community living center of the 

ing Center’’. geant Joseph George Kusick VA Community Livship, Butler County, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘SerDepartment of Veterans Affairs in Butler Town-
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08659

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08659\08659_Calc Sheet.doc EPA Technical Review Notes

x 08659\08659_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08659\08659_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08659\08659_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08659\08659_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08659\08659_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08659\Certification Statement_08659.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08659\EPA Contact\EPA Contact_Leachate Collection.rtf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08659\EPA Contact\Stanton Follow Up1 Response.rtf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08659\EPA Contact\Stanton Follow Up1.rtf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08659\EPA Contact\Stanton Follow Up2.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_GRE Stanton PIC final 12-27-06.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_MW-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_MW-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08659\Supporting Documentation\08659_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2005031EN.01002001.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 23 November 2004

in Case T-84/03: Maurizio Turco v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Openness - Public access to Council documents - Partial refusal of access - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Exceptions)

(2005/C 31/39)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-84/03: Maurizio Turco, residing in Pulsano (Italy), represented by O.W. Brouwer, T. Janssens and C. Schillemans, lawyers, supported by Republic of Finland (Agents: T. Pynnä and A. Guimaraes-Purokoski, with an address for service in Luxembourg), Kingdom of Denmark (Agents: J. Liisberg initially and subsequently J. Molde, with an address for service in Luxembourg), and Kingdom of Sweden (Agents: A. Kruse and K. Wistrand, with an address for service in Luxembourg) against Council of the European Union (Agents: J.-C. Piris and M. Bauer), supported by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: C. Jackson, instructing P. Sales and J. Stratford, Barristers, with an address for service in Luxembourg) and Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Petite, C. Docksey and P. Aalto, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for annulment of the Council's decision of 19 December 2002 partially refusing the applicant access to certain documents appearing on the agenda of the Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting of 14 and 15 October 2002 – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action in so far as it concerns the refusal of access to the Council's legal opinion; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action in so far as it concerns the refusal of access to the Council's legal opinion;

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the applicant and the Council each to bear half of the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the applicant and the Council each to bear half of the costs of the proceedings;

| 4. | Orders the interveners to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the interveners to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

1

---
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #9-23

Contact: 703-808-1198 | media@nro.mil September 28, 2023

NRO declassifies early ELINT satellite program 

Announcement at Naval Research Lab Centennial celebrates historic partnership 

CHANTILLY, Va. – The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) today announced the 

declassification of PARCAE, an electronic intelligence satellite program that was developed in 

the 1970s by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL). The announcement was made at a ceremony 

at the Pentagon celebrating the lab’s 100th anniversary, in recognition of the historic partnership 

between the NRO and NRL.

“PARCAE is an example of how the NRO uses advanced technologies developed by the NRL to 

confront some of the nation’s most daunting national security challenges,” said Dr. Troy Meink, 

principal deputy director of the NRO. 

In 1976, the NRO launched the first satellite under the PARCAE program. Its electronic 

intelligence system collected information on the Soviet Union’s naval fleet and other foreign 

entities. Flying in low-earth orbits, PARCAE satellites transmitted data to ground processing

facilities at selected ground stations around the world. 

“This provided critical information that helped the United States and allied nations win the Cold 

War,” Dr. Meink said.

The final satellite in the PARCAE program was launched in 1996, and the program continued to 

enhance U.S. national security through the war on terror. The final PARCAE satellite operated 

until 2008.

“With 100 years of history, the Naval Research Lab has been advancing science and national 

security long before we were able to leverage space,” Dr. Meink said. “Today’s centennial offers 

an opportunity to talk about how the lab’s many innovations, including PARCAE, have helped 

the NRO use the vantage point of space to make America safer and stronger.”

A full fact sheet on PARCAE is available here.

###

NRO is the leader in developing, acquiring, launching, and operating the nation’s intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance satellites to secure and expand America’s advantage in space. 

We are building a diversified and resilient architecture of spacecraft and ground systems 

designed to meet the challenges of a changing space environment by accelerating innovation and 

leveraging strategic partnerships, backed by a diverse and highly skilled workforce. Learn more 

at NRO.gov.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    February 6, 2004



/s/    ALFRED A.
PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



36
----

 EXHIBIT 32.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report UltraGuard Water Systems Corp.. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth Fielding, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 Date: February 7, 2005

/s/ Ken Fielding                                   Ken Fielding   President and Chief Executive Officer 

----
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114882 

Ii 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1400031528D 

i 

< •. 

18 March 1970 • ~J 

/, .} 

,MEMORAh'DUM FOR THE DI~OR,NATIONAL RECODAISSANCE on ICE 

SUBJECT: TAGBOARD Background Notes 

1. syst~ Cap~b.!!.i~y: 

Drone: Range 3000 NMj speed 3.21 mach; Alt, 80,000 - 960°00, small ReS (.2 sq meter frontal area at 

15 depression angle) 

Camera: 24 inch focal lengtht F5.6 lens, coverage 

3000 n X 28NY swath stereoJ ,..".",·/ ... c,'C>17 ;::.fT Nad/,;-

2. Drone status: 

A. 34 drones ordered (D21B's, 8-52 launch config.) 

13 drone flights through 20 Feb 10 

1 drone inadvertently dropped from 8-52 

?m' droftes l"elU.ining 

b. Of the 20 remaiDingt 6 are at Bea.le AFB (Operating 

Location). 15 are at Loekheed~ either in temporary storage 

or completing tinal functional checkout. 

3 .. R'" ~ { H\ t.'7~ ("'c. '." j .•.. ~ if"G~' l CtHl!!a. Status: i f\ ~ ~ ~ til ~w;?U t'" Y 

a. 11 HI-33S B Series ordered fram Byeon 

2 lest on drone flights 

9 cameras remaining 

b. Of the {) remaining, 6 have been delivered. 3 are 

in the final stages of production. Based on projected 

recovery and loss rates, the 9 eamerasshould be sufficient 

for the 20 droDes remaining. 

4. _ Test Flight Summary: .... -----.. .." ,.. .... 

a. 6 Nc,-v 61 - 28 Aug 68.. Seven test flights. one fully 

successful mission, 2824 ml1es, batch air recovered; one 

partially successful mission, 1400 miles 

b. 

by Mr. 

engine 

Sep - Dec 68. Program technical review conducted ~ Plummerta: group from LMSe. Major design mods, 

i,let and electrical systems .. 

'\ \ 

,;:2?Y'S='iMii 92id]t > , 

A 4 

1 2 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114882 
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114882 

A' 

c. 15 Dec 68 - 10 Jul 69.. Four test flights. Three 

of the four were successful. 

d. 10 Ncv 69. First operational test mission.. Computational errors in INS computer prevented drone from flying 

programmed route. 

e. 20 Feb 70. Completely successful test mission, INS 

program changes validated, fail-safe feature incorporated in 

INS program. 

S. C~~.~!!\lmlJUtry : 

a. R&D, Production and Test. Approximately $200 million 

through FY-10 (includes original 5 drones developed and tested 

under the OXCART program.) ~ Prod. Test costs are complete. 

h. Contractor support cost, FY-70: $5.9 million. 

c.. Contractor support cost Forecast, FY-71: $6.3 million 

6. f?pex'a,E,ing U~.!: 

4200 Support Squa.dron, Beale .!FB. Tvo B-52's, three flight 

crews, Blue Suit maintenance. Squadron on Alert status - has 

the capability to launch drone within 6 days from notification. 

FRAl'Ut •• HARTLEY l> Jr 

Col, USAF 

Director, Program D 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114882 

4: 

2 2:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRIS JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 606 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 31.3



I, Joseph A. De Perio, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of GlassBridge Enterprises, Inc..; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 1, 2017



| | /s/ Joseph A. De Perio                
| | --------------------------------------
| | Joseph A. De Perio                    
| | Chairman (principal executive officer)
#### *Rogers*v. *Grant,*

from Northampton

Remanded for find' ing of further facts.
EXHIBIT 11

                           IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  (Amounts in Thousands except Per Share Data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,              September 30,
                                                    ----------------------     ----------------------
                                                      1996         1997          1996         1997
                                                    --------     --------       --------     --------
<S>                                                 <C>          <C>             <C>         <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to common
   stockholders                                      $    --     $   (325)       $   417     $(1,810)
                                                    ========     ========       ========     ========
Weighted Average Shares:
   Common Stock - Voting                               9,627       11,594          8,538      10,446
   Common Stock - Nonvoting                              500          454            443         460
   Class A Common Stock                                   --           --              5          --
   Series A1 Preferred Stock                              --           --             15          --
   Series A2 Preferred Stock                              --           --            219          --
   Series A3 Preferred Stock                              --           --             97          --
   Series C Preferred Stock                               --           --            544          --
                                                    --------     --------       --------     --------
Weighted average shares outstanding                   10,127       12,048          9,861      10,906

Dilutive effect of stock options considered
   common stock equivalents computed under the
   treasury stock method using the average price         378          --             240          --
                                                    --------     --------       --------     --------
Weighted average common and common equivalent
   shares outstanding                                 10,505       12,048         10,101      10,906
                                                    ========     ========       ========     ========
Net income (loss) per common and common
   equivalent share                                  $  0.00     $  (0.03)       $  0.04     $ (0.17)
                                                    ========     ========       ========     ========

</TABLE>
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 New York - Fiscal Year 2024