alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
•••":1•.:7

rp

L:

•

_Top_SEGitti_

•

February 12, 1964

MEMORANDUM TO DIRECTOR, NRO STIFF

SUBJECT: NRO Policy

References: (a) Letter, DNRO to DCI, 10 Dec 63,

with Attachments

Memo, BR NO to SecDef, 7 Feb 64 ,

Moo, DIRO to Directors, Program "b

Program I, 10 Dec 63

Reims:me (a) describes a management plan for the

CORWA system ant; sets forth the basis for gene as MO

policy w::th respect to the following nectars:

Responsibilities and authorities of the proposed

director cf the CORONA project;

The institution of chanses and improvements to the

CORMA system;

The planning and execution of studies toward new

developments;

4. The planning and 4,1ecutiun of new developments.

Zeference (b) adds further material on these matters,

and reference (c) institutes some specific procedrres in '

implementation thereof. Collectively, these references

define a rather broad policy with respect to planning and

institution of changes and net, developments, specifically

in reference to CORONA.

:..

D:E" •

; • • ....A. i.17;

'r 2 -1114J4i.
^

if

1•*.:

•

•

•

.Eisrice

Srockway WW1=

rector

timbal Reconnaissance Office

rtsrtrol Sv

•

itt

I desire that you prepare a document summarising the t

basic policies that are set forth in the references, recamp

mending any changes or expansions that you consider desirable.

The purpose of this document is to provide a convenient .1

unified statement of the material, for reference.

Some items of policy not completely defined by the

references are given below, for inclusion, if desirable, in

your summary.

A. Flamini, *mien, eogineerift, and incorporation

of specific system changes will be authorised, and assigned

for accomplishment, by decision of MD.

D. Authorised planning, design, and engineering of

changes will be conducted under contracts separate from those

under which normal operations are conducted.

I consider that DRRO approval will be required

for, among others, any change in the system which alters the

format or content of any part of the product, for any change

that alters the format or flexibility of planning or control

of missions, for any change that requires prior flight

1111111111Ir

or for any change that requires more than, say,

f engineering effort.

Any change that requires extensive flight testing, •

or one that alters such things as the size or nature of the

product material, the controlling dimensions of the prime

sensor, the amount of recovered material, the mode of recovery,

or the basic philosophy of design of the prime sensor, I

consider to be so sweeping in character as to be classed as

a "new development." Thus classified, such a champ would

have to be judged for desirability against other potential

new developments.

2
JEFFREY E. STARLING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1235

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, A. 

Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, and Kasey Helms, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8248-8249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03119]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 2

[GN Docket No. 13-185; FCC 14-31]


Commercial Operations in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 
2155-2180 MHz Bands

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rules; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission announces that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a period of three years a 
non-substantive change to a currently approved information collection 
requirements contained in the regulations in the ``Commercial 
Operations in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz.'' 
The information collection requirement was approved on December 23, 
2014 by OMB.

DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR 2.1033(c)(19)(i) through (ii), 
published at 79 FR 32410, June 4, 2014, is effective February 17, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information contact 
Nancy Brooks on (202) 418-2454 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#024c636c617b2c40706d6d6971426461612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="da94bbb4b9a3f498a8b5b5b1a99abcb9b9f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document announces that on December 23, 
2014, OMB approved, for a period of three years a non-substantive 
change to a currently approved information collection requirement 
contained in 47 CFR 2.1033(c)(19)(i) through (ii). The Commission 
publishes this document to announce the effective date of this rule 
section. See, Amendment of the Commission's rules with Regard to 
Commercial Operations in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-
2180 MHz, GN Docket No. 13-85; FCC 14-31, 79 FR 32410, June 4, 2014.

Synopsis

    As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 
3507), the Commission is notifying the public that it received OMB 
approval on December 23, 2014, for the information collection 
requirement contained in 47 CFR 2.1033(c)(19)(i) through (ii). Under 5 
CFR part 1320, an agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of 
information unless it displays a current, valid OMB Control Number.
    No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply 
with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
that does not

[[Page 8249]]

display a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number is 3060-
0057.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03119 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
.. Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140945 

TOP SECRET _ ..ENT-KEYHOLE BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

THE NRO STAFF 

-tSH\IATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

August 2, 1973 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Civil Application of NRO Imagery 

I discussed the attached memorandum with Dr. Elliott, 

Scientific Advisor to Dr. Kissinger, NSC Staff, and made 

the following recommendations: 

- The planning and implementation phases of the civil 

applications mechanism should be handled at at least the 

TALENT-KEYHOLE level. I pointed out that the present draft 

was "skirting" the system and was receiving too widespread 

dissemination within the civil community. Dr. Elliott 

agreed and said that he had been advised that in the draft 

stage the planning document should be classified SECRET. 

He said that the final Kissinger memorandum should be 

classified TALENT-KEYHOLE and the process should be carried 

out at that level. 

- I recommended that either NASA should come off the 

Civil Application Subcommittee or that the NRO should be 

added as a member. Preferably since neither NASA nor NRO 

will determine requirements, both organizations should serve 

with the Subcommittee as consultants. I believe NASA's 

resources will be employed to satisfy some civil requirements as well as those from the NRO. 

- I also suggested that the DCI representative to 

the Executive Committee of the ICCERSP should be charged not 

with facilitating acquisition of clearances but charged with 

protection of intelligence sources and methods within the 

(non-security conscious) ICCERSP. 

Dr. Elliott felt that these suggestions were all valid 

and indicated that he would incorporate them in the final 

memorandum from Dr. Kissinger. 

TALENT-KEYHOLE HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

CLASSIFIED BY BYEMAN 1 EXEMPT FROM 

GENERAL DECLASSI F1 CA Tl ON 6CH E OU l E OF 

EXECUTIIIE ORDER 11662 EXEMPTION CATE· 

GORY 502 DECLASSIFY ON IMP OET. 

TOP SECRET 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140945 

coNTRoL No Internal 

COPY Or COPIES 

PAGE_l_oF_2_ PAGES 
.. Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140945 

TOP SECRET T T-KEYHOLE 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

nversation with Dr. Elliott I was contacted 

by office and was asked what our comments were 

on pp . related the above and suggested that it 

might be appropriate for the IC Staif to make similar 

suggestions. 

ROLD S. COYLE, JR. 

Major, USAF 

cc: Gen Kulpa 

SS-3 

TALENT-KEYHOLE HANDLE VIA CLASSIFIEDBV BYEMAl'I 1 EXEMPT FROM IBP s REI GENERAL DECLA.SSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF 

EXECUTIVE OROE A 11662 E XEMPTtoN CA. TE, EC 

coNTRoL No Internal 

COPY OF COPIES 

PAGE--z-OF-----z- PAGES BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM GORY 582 DECLASSIFY ON IMP OET, 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140945
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7124
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY RAGIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-25-P, CA-94-379-3-CV-P) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before HALL and MI CHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Ragin, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; B. Frederic Williams, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Ragin appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We affirm. Ragin contends that because he was subjected to both criminalpenalties and the civil forfeiture of his real property, his conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. We note initially that Ragin's property was forfeited pursuant to a consent judgment, butfurther review of the record reveals that it was seized as forfeitable under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) (1994), a statute found categorically not to constitute criminal punishment for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. Ursery , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565, 4572 (U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). For these reasons, we affirm the district court's dismissal of Ragin's motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) (10/2020) Standard Document(72.37 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) Overview(219.33 KB)

Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) CPPE(25.69 KB)

Irrigation Land Leveling (Ac.) (464) Network Diagram(94.18 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Irrigation Land Leveling

This video explores how Steve and Linda White implement this conservation practice on their farm in Gardnerville, Nevada.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2005101EN.01002302.xml

| 27.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3706 — Övag/Investkredit)

(2005/C 101/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2154

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename the Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in Fargo, 
  North Dakota, as the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              CENTER IN FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA AS THE EDWARD T. SCHAFER 
              AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Renaming.--The Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in 
Fargo, North Dakota, shall hereafter be known and designated as the 
``Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2012-0636

 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM037AD

A310-74-2003, R04 --- 1/9/13

A300-74-6003, R04 --- 1/9/13

A310-74-2003, R05 --- 5/23/13

A300-74-6003, R05 --- 5/23/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# C_2004262EN.01004901.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/49

---

Action brought on 5 August 2004 by Colgate-Palmolive Company against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

(Case T-322/04)

(2004/C 262/92)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 5 August 2004 by Colgate-Palmolive Company, established in New York (United States), represented by Enrique Armijo Chávarri and Antonio Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2004 delivered in Case R 0076/2004-2, and; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2004 delivered in Case R 0076/2004-2, and;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Mark covered by the application: | Word mark ‘SIMPLY WHITE’- Application No 2688315. |
| --- | --- |
| Products or services: | Dentifrices, toothpaste and mouth wash (Class 3). |
| Decision challenged before the Board of Appeal: | Refusal by the Examiner of the application. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Application dismissed. |
| Grounds for decision: | Incorrect interpretation of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94. |

Mark covered by the application:

Word mark ‘SIMPLY WHITE’- Application No 2688315.

Products or services:

Dentifrices, toothpaste and mouth wash (Class 3).

Decision challenged before the Board of Appeal:

Refusal by the Examiner of the application.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Application dismissed.

Grounds for decision:

Incorrect interpretation of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94.

---
TOP-SECRET .•,•• 

•

•••• •••• •••••••• r•sar..1

•

TOP SECRET

—461- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE 0

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR May 19, 1967

ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 12

SUBJECT: COR1111111111pperations

T g CORONA system and the programmed introduction RONNE

1111011111system, coupled with the increasing scope and m of t milimillw&

=MOB

sophist cat of other NRP systems, necessitates the establish- ilim

ment of a centralized control of the definition, specification,`''

recommended programming, and technical direction of the soft- IIIIE

ware for mission planning and evaluation. To minimize the - 111111

redundant efforts and to make maximum use of the limited talent 111111

available I have established a CORO perational 111111

software coordination group with the irecto of Satellite 111111 Operations Center, NRO Staff, to provide the chairman. ill=

1111111

111111

Define the CORO ftware requirements

for the pre-mission and on-orbi g, and the mission

evaluation functions. This includes the definition of the

mandatory SOC interfaces with other organizations. It does

not include such.functions as software requirements for vehicle

command and control and other software such as the STC.

Determine the funding necessary to implement the

requirements.

.c. Recommend the organizational responsibilities for

the software acquisition and funding.

d. Provide the Technical Direction for the acquisition,

development, and operational employment of this software.

This group is directed to accomplish the following functions:
40.693,

1004

-TOP-SECRETCORONA

e. Provide the planning and recommend improvements,

modifications, and updating as required.

The SOC will chair the group composed of your representa7

tives to accomplish this vital task. The SOC will contact you

for the names of your representatives who must b

cleared and knowledgeable of the CORO

Ooril

su interfaces. I desire that the definition of the CORONA/

software requirements and funding and the recoendation mm

prOturement be forwarded by 1 September 1967.

Distribution:

Dir of Sp Proj (SAFSP)

Dir of Recon Proj (CIA)

3 Dir, NRO Staff •

DNRO

r.DNr.0

/SS-4 (Col Howard)

CORO • •

tempt, Popo dm 1.1 C

-TOP-Sig-RIFF-"

•

SOPT

Page

2023-67

Glom •
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

 

April 18, 2011 

Ms. Dorothy Beard 

Chief-Docket Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Delta/Virgin Blue Group Antitrust Immunity Proceeding 

 Docket OST-2009-0155 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

The Joint Applicants are pleased to report that on April 17, 2011, the Virgin Blue Group 

successfully upgraded its reservation system to Navitaire New Skies version 3.3.1. The 

compatible systems and procedures are now in place to support automated codesharing across 

the Delta/Virgin Blue Group networks under the proposed joint venture, including the display of 

DL* code on flights operated by Virgin Blue and Pacific Blue. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director, Government Affairs 

 and Associate General Counsel 

cc: Anita Mosner, Counsel for the Virgin Blue Group
Exhibit 10.39.9

AMENDMENT NO. 9

TO THE

UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.

EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN

Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) hereby amends the above-named plan (the Plan), effective as of
August 31, 1997, as follows:

1. Section 3.7(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

(i) The amount of Elective Contributions made in any Plan Year on behalf of all Highly Compensated
Employees shall not result in an Actual Deferral Percentage for such Highly Compensated Employees that exceeds the greater of:

(A) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by 1.25;
or

(B) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year,
multiplied by two, provided that the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Highly Compensated Employees does not exceed the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year by more than two percentage
points.

2. Sections 3.7(a)(iv) and (v) (and any successors to them) of the Plan are hereby deleted.

* * * * *

The
Company has caused this Amendment No. 9 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.



|                    |  |                       |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Company            
|                    | 
|                    |  | UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
|                    |  |                      
|Dated: May 10, 2010 |  | By:                   |  | /s/    ROBERT M. LING,
JR.                
|                    |  | Its:                  |  | Executive Vice President & General Counsel
=

ee :
ene se

17

i taS°2% 448 lg |¢ [#13
q | ay , g
7 hy duu! boyd
atta ed |
Cea AME ay