alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005094EN.01000501.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3718 — IFIL/Intesa/Marcegaglia/Sviluppo Italia/SIT)

(2005/C 94/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
ACCOUNTING "eLASsiFtcaTiON |
‘SymBoL sa REFERS TO OF REFERENCE

“) {SPECIAL INSTAUCTIO!

» AGIMUTH BLIGHT PATH ANGLE, APPROXIMATELY 172 J





VERMENT PRINZE’ OFF
- .1:; ••

Deputy Secretary of Defense

•

• I. P. 1Y

HANDLE THROUGIOInit

I:4 • • • .• / SYSTEM OIL

.4,1 If I

.01n11011••• 1 ft 110.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

r.e WASHINGTON •

e Orme= or TI Guam sccorrArre

. %fx.

March 29, 1965

Dear Cy,

I want to express to you my appreciation for your

personal support in restoring a state of normalcy to the

current CORONA operations. As I reported to you on Friday,

there has been a resumption of data provision, and information that had been withheld during the last several o erations

is now available at the STC to the Director of

It is q that the Agency representatives o not want

to hav people look at their data, and I have instructed my people not to raise or test this issue.

I realize that this return to a more normal state of

operations has been a laborious process and has, unfortunately,

absorbed a disproportionate amount of your time. I regret

that fact; however, I am sure that you recognize that until a

realignment of responsibilities is accomplished, I, as DNRO,

am powerless to bring about any significant improvements in

NRO management where the Agency is concerned. It is also

evident that this current achievement necessitated your personal

intervention. Mindful of that fact, for the near future I will

personally try to minimize any further perturbations in NRO

activities, pending a successful conclusion to your negotiations

on organization. I have attached a copy of my note to

General Carter.

Sincerely,

Attachment IPPIProc ay McM

Honorable Cyrus R. Vance
.10

DEPARTMENTOFTHEAIRFORCE

WASHINGTON

°WW1 OP THS UNOSS SIONTARY

limb 29, 1965

Dear Pat,

I have been in touch with our West Coast

people during this current operation, and

General Greer has informed we that your people

have resumed necessary data at

the ETC to during the oo.orbit

operations: an part ly pleased that we

again can benefit from the "qpick look" date

provided by your people before it goes back to

the AI?. I mould like to empress my sincere

appreciation to you for your personal efforts in

restoring a successful spotting relationship in

the on•orbit operations.

Sincerely,

/5 I

Brockway McMillan

Lt. General Marshall C. Carter

rout",; Director

Central Intelligence Agency

1

HANDLE THROUGH

SYSTEM ONLY
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 12:36 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Brian Coffey; Bruce Smith; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Pete rson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard Parker; Rick Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert va n Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo Subject: Comments on Supply and Competitiveness

As requested, please find attached our comments regarding 1) core material supply and 2) core material competitiveness.

Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00421

- CV

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

Aaron WEED and Vicky Weed, Individually and as Next Friends of Kaitlyn Weed, a Minor,

Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 01932

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2011

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Their motion states that

appellees have agreed to nonsuit with preju dice all claims against appellant. The parties have

moved this court to tax costs against the party that incurred them and dismiss the appeal. The

joint motion is granted and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2). In04

- 11

- 00421

- CV

- 2

- accordance with the agreement, costs of this appeal are taxed against the party that incurred

them. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,288,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,867,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    833,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,271,047
<PP&E>                                         653,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,528,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,290,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    40,189,771
<OTHER-SE>                                (38,141,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,048,729
<SALES>                                      7,182,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,182,046
<CGS>                                        3,195,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,423,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,518,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,518,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,518,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(File No. 333-129192), the Registration Statement on Form S-4(File No. 333-132931) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File No. 333-129861, File No. 333-117273, File No. 333-106946,File No. 333-106436, File No. 333-91276, File No. 333-76636,File No. 333-69722, File No. 333-40466 and File No. 333-95007)of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc., Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.’s management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|                       | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts |
| March 13, 2007   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      19,592,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,314,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,786,081
<PP&E>                                       7,759,715
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,525,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,726,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,314,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,919
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,400,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,726,025
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               812,361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,447,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,323,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,323,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,323,548)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32(a)





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the three
month period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc., certify that based on my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
      6, 2010
              /s/ A.L. GiannopoulosA.L.
      Giannopoulos
# C_2004300EN.01001801.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-55/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

1

(Workers - Recognition of diplomas - Civil air traffic controllers - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 300/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-55/03: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 11 February 2003 by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Patakia and M. Valverde López) against Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; Advocate General: P. Léger; Registrar: R. Grass, gave a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard K.
Crump, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/  RICHARD K. CRUMP
------------------------------
(Richard K. Crump)
Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:   December 13, 2002



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
DEPARTIMENTOFTHEAURFORCE

WASHINGTON

OFF= OF THNIE UNDO* Sacmirroar

May 30, 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

SUBJECT: Waiver of Department of Defense (DOD) Directives

and Instructions

You will recall that on May 3, 1972 you directed

implementation of the Satellite Data System (SDS)

Management Plan. In your May 3, 1972 memo, you recognized that there was a need to waive certain DOD

Directives and Instructions which conflict with the

SDS Management Plan. Several of these have now been

identified and require your waiver approval to effect

the necessary security requirements and to implement

streamlined management procedures.

Your signature on the attached letter will accomplish this waiver.

Attachment

Proposed Memo
THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGT011, D. C. 20301

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER)

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (TELECOMMUNICATIONS)

UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

SUBJECT: Waiver of Department of Defense (DOD) Directives

and Instructions

In accordance with my memo, "Satellite Data System

(SDS) Management Plan," May 3, 1972, the SDS Program is

exempted from the provisions of the following DOD Directives and Instructions.

"Acquisition

"Performance

1972.

Department of Defense Directive Number 5000.1,

of Major Defense Systems," July 13, 1971.

Department of Defense Instruction Number 7000.2,

Measurement for Selected Acquisitions," April 25,

c. Department of Defense Instruction Number 7041.2,

"Cost Information Reports (CIR)," June 13, 1966.

This waiver is effective immediately.

Kenneth Rush
<PAGE>
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of U.S.
Plastic Lumber Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies that:



         3.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



         4.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.






--------------------------------------------
Mark S. Alsentzer, Chief Executive Officer           Date:
                                                            -------------------
EXHIBIT (32)

South Street Financial Corp.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of South Street Financial Corp. (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                             |  | 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: April 11, 2007 |  | /s/ R. Ronald Swanner       |  | 
|                      |  | R. Ronald Swanner           |  | 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer     |  | 
|                      |  |                            
|Dated: April 11, 2007 |  | /s/ Christopher F. Cranford |  | 
|                      |  | Christopher F. Cranford     |  | 
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer     |  |
del

„..

/e7,5"-C 6.4‘73

4C0001

i1rcOltre1Gci.A.4"..

4118108VIOD. 744 ciommprezeArnwoslems .

oRscrkeet, CLAINffiriCATtoti *REFER0114111 , MZDIBIIIEWIIPZINMEESI

y.

IrspitM,INPTRuCIIONlr

••213

PAT

L1,411816

-OingOirrnite TO

IN 110.114P0

,EArz rims

Le' ‘_

FORM

I MAY 50:

:ottruciss DD. FORM -C?pr 41WWHICH USED UNTIL ax,imuirrso

, •

V. 8. Sovlbertrultir runkrott. °nowise so

Y.
0.13
• • .:"

- •-fi. ,.;• 441[SSAGEr Ifikt:

PIO
Thursday, November 12, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) 

Re: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Petition for Amendment to Exemption Docket FAA 2015-2693, 

under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, 

to add the DJI Inspire 1 Unmanned Aircraft.

To whom it may concern,

Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. would like to add an addendum to our request for exemption from Part 

21 Subpart H; and Sections 91.203 (a) (1), 45.23 (b), 91.7 (a), 91.9, 61.113, 61.133, 91.109, 91.119, 

91.121, 91.151, and (91.401 - 91.417) Subpart E, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

This proposed addendum would allow for the operation of an additional unmanned aircraft, DJI Inspire 1

for the purposes of aerial data acquisition, LiDAR survey, videography and photography. 

This exemption cites similarity with relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11445, 

11062, 11109, 11112, 11213, and 11138.

The DJI Inspire 1 is a multi rotor aircraft similar to the CineWing-6 already listed in our exemption 

request (Exemption Docket FAA 2015-2693-0001). At the time of submission of our request for 

exemption, the DJI Inspire 1 was newly released and not yet vetted in the industry and since that time 

has proven to be the best in breed technology for the purposes we propose to fly under. We would like 

to request the addition of this unmanned aircraft due to technology improvements, to remain 

competitive, and increased demand for services of this kind at Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The User 

Manual v1.8, Safety Guidelines v1.0, and Maintenance Manual v1.0 for the DJI Inspire 1 can be found at 

this link http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1/download

No other changes are being asked for in the original request. I am the primary point of contact for this 

request and look forward to working with your office.

Respectfully, 

Bobby Valentine

Firmwide Project Visualization, 

Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc.

4582 South Ulster Street

Suite 1500

Denver, Colorado 80237

d: (720)636-8304

c: (303)669-4165

bobby.valentine@kimley-horn.com
#### Farmers’ Elevator Company, Ltd., Respondent, vs. Schultz and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Clark & Lueck*of Beaver Dam.

For the respondent: *T. L. Doyle*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

Fowler, J., took no part.