alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.25(a)
 First Amendment to  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
 This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Amendment Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Employer John V. Genova Executive
 Preliminary Statements
 1.
    
    Employer and Executive are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated as of June 16, 2009 but retroactively effective as of May 27, 2008 (the
Existing Employment Agreement), pursuant to which Employer is employing
Executive as its President and Chief Executive Officer.
 2.
    
    Employer and Executive desire to amend the Existing Employment Agreement in certain
respects.
 Now, Therefore
 Amendment of Section 5(f) of the Existing Employment Agreement
 x y z
 Amendment of Section 7(e) of the Existing Employment Agreement




---



##### 



(1)
    
    Employer shall pay to Executive, in lieu of any
other severance or separation benefits (and, where the Employment
Termination Date occurs before the Change of Control, reduced by
the Severance Payment paid to Executive pursuant to Section 7(f)
below), in a single lump sum payment on the 60th day after the
Employment Termination Date where such Employment Termination
Date occurs after the Change of Control and within 60 days after
the Change of Control if such Employment Termination Date
occurred prior to the Change of Control, an amount equal to (x)
Executives Base Salary in effect on the Employment Termination
Date times 2.75 (the Base Salary Component) plus(y)
Executives ICP award at the target level for the performance
period in effect on the Employment Termination Date (but in no
event less than the target level specified in Section 5(b)) times
2.75 calculated as if Executive was employed by Employer for the
entire performance period during which the ICP award could have
been earned (the Bonus Component and, together with the
Base Salary Component, the Protection Period Severance
Payment);
 Amendment of Section 7(f) of the Existing Employment Agreement
  (1)
    
    Employer shall pay to Executive, in lieu of any
other severance or separation benefits, in a single lump sum
payment on the 60th day after the Employment Termination Date, an
amount equal to the sum of (x) 50% of the Base Salary Component
plus(y) 50% of the Bonus Component (such amount, the
Severance Payment);
 Amendment of Section 7(h) of the Existing Employment Agreement
 x y
 -2-




---



##### 



z
 Amendment of Section 7(j) of the Existing Employment Agreement
  Effect of Amendments
 Binding Effect
 Severability
 Governing Law To The Extent Not Superseded By The Laws Of The
United
States, This Amendment Shall Be Construed and Enforced in Accordance With, and
the Rights of the Parties Shall Be Governed By, the Internal Laws of the State of Texas, Without
Reference to Principles of Conflicts of Law.
 -3-




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof
 Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
    
    Executive:By:Kenneth M. Hale
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
    
    
    
    John V. Genova
 -4-
EXHIBIT 11



                           IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  (Amounts in Thousands except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                                                          March 31,
                                                                             -------------------------------------
                                                                                   1996               1997
                                                                             ------------------ ------------------
<S>                                                                              <C>                <C>

      Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders                        $        6         $     (516)
                                                                                ============       =============
                                                                             

      Weighted average shares:

         Common Stock                                                                 6,348              9,665
         Common Stock - Nonvoting                                                       330                472
         Class A Common Stock                                                            15                 --
         Series A1 Preferred Stock                                                       44                 --
         Series A2 Preferred Stock                                                      659                 --
         Series A3 Preferred Stock                                                      293                 --
         Series C Preferred Stock                                                     1,638                 --
                                                                                ------------       ------------

      Weighted average shares outstanding                                             9,327             10,137

      Dilutive effect of stock options considered common stock
        equivalents computed under the treasury stock method using
        the average price                                                                --                 --
                                                                                ------------       -------------
      Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding                9,327             10,137
                                                                                ============       =============
      Net income (loss) per common and common equivalent share                   $     0.00         $    (0.05)
                                                                                ============       =============

</TABLE>
Order entered October 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01076-CR

JASON KYLE REMBERT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1321209-H

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the June 3, 2019 motion of 

Valencia Bush to withdraw as counsel on appeal for appellant Jason Kyle Rembert. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to remove Valencia Bush as counsel of record for appellant. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to 

Jason Kyle Rembert, TDC #02223602, Jorden Unit,1992 Helton Road; Pampa, Texas, 79065.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
herewith fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. Plamann President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    RICHARD J. MARTINRichard J. Martin Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unified Western Grocers, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NUMBER 13-21-00445-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOSHUA JACOB DAVENPORT, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

This cause is before the court on appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal. We find 

the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a)(1). See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a)(1). Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, we 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 
2

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will

be entertained.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

3rd day of February, 2022.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00110-CV

JOSHUA DEROCHE AND TEXAS POOL-AID, LLC, Appellants

V.

CMI ENTERPRISES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22-CV-2292

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 31, 2023. The notice of appeal 

was filed February 12, 2024. To date, our records show that appellants have not paid 

the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil 

cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs); Tex. 

Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs). Moreover, no clerk’s record 

has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellants had not paid for the record, and there is otherwise no indication 
2

appellants have made arrangements to pay for the record. 

On February 23, 2024, appellants were instructed to pay the appellate filing 

fee on or before March 4, 2024 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without 

further notice. In addition, on February 28, 2024, notification was transmitted to 

appellants that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, 

within fifteen days, appellants made arrangements to pay for the record and provided 

this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants did not 

provide any response to any of those notices.

On March 19, 2024, appellants was ordered to pay the filing fee and 

demonstrate they had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before 

March 29, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). In the order, the court notified 

appellants that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the 

appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution.

Appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee, they have not provided this 

court with proof of payment for the record, nor have they otherwise responded to the 

court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with 

notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 California - Fiscal Year 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      14,184,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,829,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                   917,891
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,234,679
<PP&E>                                      17,473,848
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,419,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,110,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,066,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,205
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,023,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,110,907
<SALES>                                      4,329,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,218,613
<CGS>                                        3,299,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,299,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,931,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,000,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,961,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,961,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,961,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.1**

 

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registration dated December 11,1997 (File No. 333-42049), Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registration dated May26, 2000 (File No. 333-37922) and Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registrationdated May 16, 2003 (File No. 333-105329) of Colonial Realty Limited Partnershipof our report dated January 17, 2003, except for Notes 3 and 17, as to whichthe date is September 13, 2003 relating to financial statements and financialstatement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |
| Birmingham, Alabama            |
| October 9, 2003                |

 

----
November 28, 1966

MEMORANDUM MR RECORD

SUBJECT: Novemb ter from Chairman, COMM, re

1M-4- nch Rates

The attached memorandum was deliver

on the afternoon of 21 November. I advised

Dr. Flax could not accept this as an official statement of USIB

requirements and initiate any contractual actions in response

thereto.

Later that day, Mr. Reber and I discussed this with

Dr. Flax. He emphasized that he could not accept this document

as a statement of USIB requirements, that it was not the

optimum way to develop requirements, that programmatic reasons

in addition to coverage requirements determined launch rates,

etc. Several possible courses of action for the MIRO were

discussed.

Subsequently, Mr. Reber called Mr. Bross and recommended

withdrawal of the letter. Mr. Bross indicated he had not seen

it.

On the morning of 22 November I again advised Mr.

Tidwell that Dr. Flax could his letter as a statement of USIB requirements. stated he had discussed

this with the Director on t;T of November 21 and the

Director felt it was a proper action. .

5. On 22 November, I discussed the letter with Col Hall,

DIA, and cautioned him to be careful in the COMM discussions

since I believed CIA was determined to woke the requirements

not exceeuccessful launches per year because they felt

DOD requi 'were too high. I also discussed the letter

with Gen Carroll the evening of 22 November and expressed the

same opinion to him. Can Carroll was quite surprised at the

letter since the subject had not been discussed in USIB. Gen

Carroll indicated he probably would discuss this with Mr. Helms.

f 4ncur. v!x. 3YE1AN

•• ma. eo • • ••• 1

1.
.• 

:1

6. On the morning of Nov 23, I discussed the letter with

Mr. Sheldon and Mr. Bross, recommending its withdrawal and

strongly protesting this unilateral CIA action.

7.111111Mpintroduced the letter in COHOR on the

morning o 23, prefacing his remarks that he was not

trying to "end-run" the COMO& but had been directed to document

the CIA position - by the DCI. According to the NRO Staff

representative at the meeting, the end result was "a lot of

unhappy COMM members."

- 8. On November 23, Mr. Bross called Dr. Flax indicating

that perhaps the letter should be returned to him without

action.

9. In the afternoon

The DCI advised Dr. Flax

sent him--poorly worded,

it. Later in the meet

not only felt the futur

doubted the need for anyl

of November 23, at the ExCom meeting,

that this letter should not have been

improper channel, etc--and to forget

Mr. Sheldon indicated that the CIA

unch rate was too h but

apability aft. 88

operational. Dr. Flax and I both res ad amas that

there was no future need fo- esolution.

10. The original and copy 2 of the letter were returned

to Mr. Bross....'without action, per his discussion with Dr.

Flax and subsequent remarks by the DCI at the ExCom" on

November 28.

11111r6147-66

James T. Stewart

Major General, USAF

Director, NRO Staff

1. SS-1

_".2. SS-5

3. SS-4

2 2
#### STATE v. MONROE CANNON.

*Indictment*— Motion *in Arrest.*

A motion in arrest of judgment cannot be grounded upon the fact that the' prosecuting- witness was foreman of the grand jury and endorsed the bill of indictment.

*(State*v. *Roberts,*2 Dev. & Bat., 540, cited and approved).

INDICTMENT for false pretence tried at Fall Term, 2883, of Bueke Superior Court, before *Graves, J.*

After a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, upon the ground that the bill of indictment found against him had been found by the grand jury at a term of the, court when J. A. Lackey (the prosecutor) was the’ foreman of' the grand jury, and signed his name on tlje bill as such, to the finding of the indictment as a true bill — the said Lackey having testified that he was the owner of the goods described in the indictment. His Honor refused the motion, and the defendant appealed from the judgment pronounced.

*Attorney-General,*for the State

*Mr. Isaao T. Avery,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

The cause assigned by the defendant for the arrest of judgment is groundless, and would be so if it appeared upon the face of the record. But a judgment can only be arrested for matter appearing, or the omission of matter which ought to appear in the record. .

The record does show that Lackey was foreman of the grand jury; and it appears from the transcript that Lackey’s name was endorsed on the bill as a witness, sworn and sent to the grand jury, but the endorsements on the bill of indictment form no part of the bill, and consequently no part 'of the record.

*712If an indictment be found without legal evidence, it may be quashed, or the matter may be pleaded in abatement, but not in arrest of judgment. *State*v. *Roberts,*2 Dev. & Bat., 540.

There is m> error. Let this be certified to the superior court of Burke county, that the case may bo proceeded with according to law.

Xo error. Affirmed.
APPENDIX D 

SUMMARY OF COLLECTION & ANALYSIS OF SILT 

SAMPLES FROM PAVED ROADS IN MARICOPA COUNTY 
 D-1 

SUMMARY OF COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF 

SILT SAMPLES FROM PAVED ROADS 

IN MARICOPA COUNTY 

September 7, 2007 

Prepared for: 

Sierra Research 

1801 J Street 

Sacramento, California 95811 

Prepared by: 

Applied Environmental Consultants, Inc. 

1553 W. Elna Rae, Suite 101 

Tempe, Arizona 85281 
D-2
D-3
D-4
D-5
D-6
D-7
D-8
D-9
D-10
D-11
D-12
D-13
D-14
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 19, 2015.

# PLACE: 

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047,1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Regulatory Flexibility Act Definition of Small Entity for Consideration of Regulatory Relief.

2. Taunton Federal Credit Union (Taunton, MA), Request to Expand Community Charter.

3. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02955 Filed 2-9-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### Runngren and wife, Respondents, vs. Berg and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *John H. Sweberg*and *Earl A. Korth,*both of Rhinelander, and *Genrich & Genrich*of Wausau, attorneys, and *Miles Lambert*of Wausau of counsel.

For the respondents: *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
H:II"JjOH'V. A 

:'·:.f~UBNTfiKE¥HOLE ,/:' ,'C6lifildl SYS1111. 

'Stereo .angle' 

Frame to' frame overla.p 

Purpose· 

Focal length 

Aperture 

Mapping 

12 in:~.hes 

f/6 

nCLUDID rROM AU'rOMA';.C" UG!lAO'NG 

aDD O.R["IV[ SiOO.10 "on HOl A'I'LY 
. ' .. 

.i:.' 

,.' ; . 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: l' OCTOBER 

COP:Y"..J:~ ... G!-_"","",C_OPW 

rAGE_.a. .,J)"~ ~~ .. P.4~aS 

~.vsS~..3.1~:tq[@_ .. . ·