alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 28 October 2004

in Case C-505/03 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Quality of water intended for human consumption - Directive 80/778/EEC)

(2005/C 6/32)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-505/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and F. Simonetti) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and C. Mercier) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 28 November 2003 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting for the President of the Fourth Chamber, E. Juhász (Rapporteur) and M. Ilešič, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

----
4500445684 10/07

Attu: Legal Dept

149 Penn Avenue

Scranton,PA 1&503’

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Countyof I. f)i..I’Jt /i:v4J

IWVO(E NO.

154648

41 V jAc,M’ C)

FROM (NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENC ENCYTELEPHONE NO,

Yvette N. Rouse 717—787—9495

Bureau of Air Quality

400 Market St.,, 12th Floor

.Härrisburg, PA 17105

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIASTD—521 REV. 12-88

TO (NAME AND ADDRESS OF NEWSPAPER)

Scranton Times—Tribune

PUBLICATIONSAUTHORJZATION AND INVOICE

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by ageiy) 44 /O33f

• FEDERAL ID. NOJSOC, SEC. NO.

24—0717470

HEREWITH IS ENCLOSED COPY FOR PUBUCATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR PROPOSALS TO I TYPE OF AD

E EMPLOY PURCHASE [] CONTRACT [] SELL j E] CLASSIFiED LEGAL NOTICE I DATE ORDER NO. PUBUSHADVER11SEMyIT(NO.OF11MES) MAXIMUM NO, OFLINES I October 15, 2009

DATES OF INSERTION SIGNA FOR AGEN

October 14, 2009, Wednesday edition

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signatureto be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer.to be set solid in type regularly used by_your newspaper for public (legal)

notice advertising; charge to be made at the rate charged to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and

occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of such

discrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copy at once if you will not accept this advertisement underthe terms

set forth.

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

PASTE TEARSHEET HERE

- A F . Before me theubscrib& a NotaryPblic in and for said Coiiny perspnally carn “‘n

k

_________________________________________

WvNc1,sv7( ,
# C_2004118EN.01003801.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/38

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 31 March 2004

in Case T-216/02: Fieldturf Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Word mark LOOKS LIKE GRASS... FEELS LIKE GRASS... PLAYS LIKE GRASS - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Refusal to register)

(2004/C 118/80)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-216/02: Fieldturf Inc., established in Montreal (Canada), represented by P. Baronikians, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Waelbroeck) - action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 May 2002 (Case R 462/2001-1) concerning registration of the word mark LOOKS LIKE GRASS... FEELS LIKE GRASS... PLAYS LIKE GRASS as a Community trade mark - the Court of First Instance, (Fourth Chamber) composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a judgment on 31 March 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233 of 28.09.2002

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.4


                              Employment Agreement
                                     Between
                            The Southern Bank Company
                             and James B. Little Jr.

                                 2000 Amendment
                                 --------------

     WHEREAS, The Southern Bank Company (the "Bank") has entered into an
Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") with James B. Little Jr. (the
"Employee"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Bank (the "Board") and the Employee
have determined that it is appropriate to amend the Agreement to redefine the
Employee's position with the Bank.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement shall be amended as follows, effective
immediately.

     1.   The first sentence in Section 1 shall be amended by replacing
          "President" with "Chief Executive Officer."

     2.   Nothing contained herein shall be held to alter, vary or otherwise
          affect any of the terms, provisions or conditions of the Agreement
          other than as stated above.

     WHEREFORE, on this 21st day of September 2000, the undersigned hereby
approve this 2000 Amendment to the Agreement.



                                         THE SOUTHERN BANK COMPANY

                                         By _______________________________
                                            Its Secretary


                                         ________________________________
                                                     James B. Little, Jr.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 07/07/04

CASE NUMBER: **P04-0692**

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 2

KEYWORDS: SENS MUTA AQUATOX

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: (25 E C) > 10 g/L(Analog); VP @25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E); H < 1.00E-) POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo PBT Potential: P2B1T1 Sorption to soils/sediments = low-moderate *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow-moderate

HEALTH: Absorbed from the lung, poor absorption from the skin and GI tract (pchem). Concern for sensitization and mutagenicity from the *CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation)

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) FOR THE INTENDED PRODUCT WITH ABOUT 13 MOLES OF are: fish 96-h LC50 = 690.0 P daphnid 48-h LC50 = 690.0 P green algal 96-h EC50 = 690.0 P fish chronic value = 70.0 P daphnid ChV = 70.0 P algal ChV = 170.0 P Predictions are based on SARs ; SAR chemical class with 100% <1000 and <1% <500; log Kow for with = 0.94 (EPI); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; low concern for toxicity for the intended product
assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = 1.0 mg/L (ppm)Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) FOR

THE WORST CASE PRODUCT THAT CAN BE MADE UNDER THE CAS NAME WITH

THREE MOLES OF are:

fish 96-h LC50 = 3.9 P daphnid 48-h LC50 = 4.0 P green algal 96-h EC50 < 4.0 P fish chronic value = 0.400 P daphnid ChV = 0.400 P algal ChV < 1.0 P Predictions are based on SARs for; SAR chemical class =; ; log Kow for with = 3.7 (EPI); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; moderate concern for toxicity for the worst case product with
assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = 0.040 mg/L (ppm) *CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water with CC = 40 ppb

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMIE MICHAEL MERRILL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2521

[ March 5, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016CF010542A

.

Nicole Nicolette Mace, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Af firmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Guides and Instructions

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 

### Iowa NRCS FY23 Bulletins: 210-ENG-Engineering

Conservation Practices/Construction/Design/Drainage/Erosion Control/Energy/Hydrology/Irrigation/Maintenance/Grouting/Soil Mechanics/Specifications/Landscape Architecture/Environmental Engineering/Surveying/Dam Safety

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS FY23 Bulletins: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

Iowa NRCS FY23 Bulletins: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS FY23 Bulletins: 440-PGM-Programs

Iowa NRCS FY23 Bulletins: 440-PGM-Programs

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 190-Ecological Sciences

Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 190-Ecological Sciences

### Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 210-ENG-Engineering

Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 210-ENG-Engineering

### Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

### Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 440-PGM-Programs

Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 440-PGM-Programs

### Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 450-TCH-Science and Technology

Iowa NRCS FY24 Bulletins: 450-TCH-Science and Technology

### Iowa NRCS General Manual Amendments

Iowa NRCS General Manual Amendments

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instruction: 330-MGT-Operations Management

Iowa NRCS Instruction: 330-MGT-Operations Management

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions

**What are instructions?**Instructions are issued by state and area offices to announce detailed instructions and procedures on a specific subject.

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 110-ADM-Management

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 110-ADM-Management

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 120-ADS-Administrative Services

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 120-ADS-Administrative Services

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 180-CPA-Conservation Planning and Application

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 180-CPA-Conservation Planning and Application

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 190-ECS-Ecological Sciences

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 190-ECS-Ecological Sciences

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 210-ENG-Engineering

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 210-ENG-Engineering

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 230-EOP-Equal Opportunity

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 260-INF-Public Information

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 260-INF-Public Information

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 270-IRM-Information Resources Management

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 270-IRM-Information Resources Management

Iowa

### Iowa NRCS Instructions: 300-LTP-Land Treatment Programs

Iowa NRCS Instructions: 300-LTP-Land Treatment Programs

Iowa

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 
-  12 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last
# C_2004228EN.01003301.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/33

---

Action brought on 23 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-319/04)

(2004/C 228/68)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Rozet, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/63/EC of 21 June 1999 concerning the Agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers concluded by the European Community Shipowners' Association (ECSA) and the Federation of Transport Workers' Unions in the European Union (FST) - Annex: European Agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers (1), or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/63/EC of 21 June 1999 concerning the Agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers concluded by the European Community Shipowners' Association (ECSA) and the Federation of Transport Workers' Unions in the European Union (FST) - Annex: European Agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers (1), or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive expired on 30 June 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 167, 2.7.1999, p. 33.

1

---
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A152
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Sequestration Order for Fiscal Year 2016 Pursuant to Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, as Amended

By the authority vested in me as President by the laws of the United States of America, and in accordance with section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act (the “Act”), as amended, 2 U.S.C. 901a, I hereby order that, on October 1, 2015, direct spending budgetary resources for fiscal year 2016 in each non-exempt budget account be reduced by the amount calculated by the Office of Management and Budget in its report to the Congress of February 2, 2015.

All sequestrations shall be made in strict accordance with the requirements of section 251A of the Act and the specifications of the Office of Management and Budget's report of February 2, 2015, prepared pursuant to section 251A(9) of the Act.

[FR Doc. 2015-02539

Billing code 3295-F5
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10321 c/w 01-10334 Conference Calendar

IN RE: JOHN T. ESPINOZA, Petitioner,

------------------- Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

--------------------

____________________ No. 01-10334

____________________ ACL COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHN T. ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

----------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CV-152

------------------------ February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * John T. Espinoza seeks a writ of mandamus vacating the district court’s order remanding the case to the state court and ordering the district court to conduct a trial of the matter.No. 01-10321 c/w 01-10334 -2- Espinoza is seeking the same relief in his appeal from the district court’s order remanding the case to the state court. Because he has other adequate means to attain the requested relief, his petition for mandamus is DENIED. See In re Willy , 831 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir. 1987). Espinoza’s petition for removal asserted that he was entitled to remove the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1). Because the pleadings filed at the time the petition for removal was filed did not reflect that Espinoza was being deprived of his civil rights based on his race, the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1). See Johnson v. Mississippi , 421 U.S. 213, 219 (1975). Nor did the pleadings reflect that the district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(2) because the pleadings did not reflect that the state officials had violated any law providing for equal rights or that there was “a colorable conflict between state and federal law.” Alonzo v. City of Corpus Christi , 68 F.3d 944, 946 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, the case was not properly removed to the federal court. An order of removal is generally not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). However, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) provides an exception for “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443.” Because the pleadings on file at the time of the removal did not meet the jurisdictional prerequisites of 28 U.S.C. § 1443, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the appeal. The appeal isNo. 01-10321 c/w 01-10334 -3- thus DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The petition for mandamus is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM: THE COMPANY'S
GENERAL LEDGER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,164
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             662
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,145
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     39,668
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        171,799
<ALLOWANCE>                                       (986)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,445
<DEPOSITS>                                     196,803
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,082
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,783
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 235,445
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,555
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  642
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   125
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,322
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,266
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,056
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      140
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    341
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         341
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.55
<LOANS-NON>                                         74
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    24
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,513
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      185
<RECOVERIES>                                        31
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  986
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               986
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>