alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
 ARTICLE ONE
NAME
  ARTICLE TWO
CAPITALIZATION
  ARTICLE THREE
LIMITATION ON DIRECTOR LIABILITY
  (A)
    
    any appropriation, in violation of the directors duties, of any business opportunity
of the corporation;
 (B)
    
    acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
 (C)
    
    liability under Section 14-2-832 (or any successor provision or redesignation thereof)
of the Georgia Business Corporation Code; and
 (D)
    
    any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's Financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March 31,
1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                       110
<INVENTORY>                                        817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,469
<PP&E>                                           2,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                     701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,572
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,354
<SALES>                                          5,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,204
<CGS>                                            3,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (114)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (154)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997
        AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                                  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                        8,938
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             4,043,262
<ALLOWANCES>                            (1,045,166)
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4,562,625
<PP&E>                                      447,359
<DEPRECIATION>                             (96,240)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            8,788,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     6,449,972
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                (274,761)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              8,788,761
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         17,098,542
<CGS>                                    12,512,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            12,512,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          5,692,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            734,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          307,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (2,148,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (2,148,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (2,148,402)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.97)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

     We consent to the references to us in "Part I, Item 1 and 2. Business and
Properties - Natural Gas and Oil Reserves" in Amendment No. 1 to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of The Houston Exploration Company for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and in Houston Exploration's previously filed Registration
Statements (and any prospectus supplement thereto) on: (i) Form S-3, file number
333-78843 dated May 20, 1999; (ii) Form S-8, file number 333-36977 dated October
1, 1997; (iii) Form S-8, file number 333-47370 dated October 5, 2000; (iv) Form
S-8, file number 333-75264 dated December 17, 2001; and (v) Form S-8, file
number 333-99799 dated September 19, 2002.



                                               /s/ MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                   MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

Houston, Texas
November 13, 2003
es fufermetion Sicivel fren these’ debe wi,
hc Syaten, Se et shuaaieabenenscnieeter!
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aware, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Edmund C. Reiter


/s/ Richard P. MobergEdmund C. Reiter


Richard P. MobergPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial OfficerDate:  February 11, 2011


Date: February 11, 2011




The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
A..S.A.TEL4T3C .41DNICIeiC OONSASTMO 'OF . U14).1:::i*O9*-iTA!'

NO. 'AND AOSTA

00: *0.,.**0::ATTiebuirr ritou.SrAl ‘ ri i6:4..PAD 4 ,

AT 1646:18. 07. PDT ON it SEPTEltiii.4:i94 4:,. TiTE!PIOM.ARIrr;

Olt.BITA10 PERIOD''ATTAINED APPEARS TO BE APPROXIMATEL

2:2 Midi HIGHER THAN isTONIINAL. 45. ED ON FIRIVT PASS 

64114

ED NAME Atio. iinisitufig•ilira,q required

DD FORM ,173, 1 OCT; 4111. WHICH WILL 'ME USED UNTIL EXHAUSTED

•- .

t"

'.';
## Velva L. Price Travis County District Clerk Travis County Courthouse Complex P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767-9003
September24,2015
Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court ofAppeals P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547 Dear Mr. Kyle, A clerk'srecord in cause number, D-1-GN-14-004025 and Court ofAppeals number 03-15-00402-CV, styled, ANTHONY WEST ET AL V DANIEL WANNAMAKER, was due in your office September 24, 2015. To date, the clerk's office has not receivedpayment for the clerk's record from the pro se appellant. Thankyou for your consideration. Ifyouhave any questions, please contact me at (512) 854-4309 Sincerely, TrishWinkler Deputy Court Clerk II (512) 854-4309

Administrative Offices (512) 854·9457 fax: 854·4744 Civil and Family Division (512) 854-9457 fax: 854-9549 Criminal Division (512) 854-9420 fax: 854-4566 Jury Office (512) 854-9669 fax: 854-4457
ad144.4.7.7a

4111111C111111111

DERICK L.

Major, USAF • .

gosea.

132 filta44W.

mmftw Interne 

—TOP-SECRET— can or covets

Mann) 1•06 1.10rai C BMA, 111

—TOP-SEOREF51(1 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

THE NRO STAFF November 16, 1970

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. MCLUCAS

SUBJECT: Briefing to Secretary Rogers

On Friday, November 13, we held a dry run of the

presentations to Secretary Rogers in Mr. Morrison's office.

The presentation we have prepared for you meshes very

nicely in content with that prepared by Mr. John Hughes

for DIA. He has volunteered to make his viewgraphs

available to you should you care to run through them.

The DIA presentation talks about satisfaction of photographic requirements and gives examples of good and bad

coverage. The entire presentation is on viewgraphs.

General Bennett will be out of town and General Philpott

will give the DIA presentation. Admiral Gayler has chosen

to prepare his own presentation and his representative was

unable to tell us its content.

As a result of the dry run, I have incorporated

several suggestions into your presentation. I have shown

them in the attached book by lining through the existing

words and by making additions. Six pages are affected

and the changes are relatively minor. Also attached for

your use are a set of viewgraphs showing NRO hardware, and

a note book showing the same hardware but including brief

descriptions.

Immi nimpont
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-31133

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARRELL STALLWORTH,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-81-ALL

---------------------------

June 4, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darrell

Stallworth has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Stallworth

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Exhibit 21

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF AVAX
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

|      |                                                                                                                                
|----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|NOTE: | All of the entities listed below are wholly owned direct or indirect
 subsidiaries of AVAX Technologies, Inc., except as noted.

UNITED STATES INCORPORATION (DELAWARE)

AVAX International IP Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Services, Inc.

AVAX America, Inc.

DENMARK OFFSHORE HOLDING COMPANY

AVAX Technologies Holdings ApS

FRENCH ENTITIES

GPH, S.A.

Genopoietic, S.A.

AUSTRALIAN ENTITIES

AVAX Australia Holdings Pty Limited

AVAX Australia Pty Limited (1)

AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty Limited (1)

|    |                                                                                                                                                       | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    |                                                                                                                                                      
|(1) | At December 31, 2007, AVAX Holdings Pty Limited held a 95% interest
 in both AVAX Australia Pty Limited and AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty Limited.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HANOVER
DIRECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 27, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN IT ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                           3,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,175)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,703
<PP&E>                                          88,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,982)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,927
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,175
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,539
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,489
<SALES>                                        127,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,714
<CGS>                                           81,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,884)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,147)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    ( 193)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005115EN.01002701.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/27

---

Action brought on 22 February 2005 by Sergio Rossi SpA against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-97/05)

(2005/C 115/50)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 February 2005 by Sergio Rossi SpA, represented by Alessandro Ruo, lawyer.

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal was Marcorossi Srl.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the contested decision which is the subject-matter of the dispute; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the contested decision which is the subject-matter of the dispute;

| 2. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for registration of the Community trade mark: | Marcorossi Srl. |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark applied for: | Word mark MARCOROSSI — Application for registration No 1 405 869 for goods in Class 18 (bags, cases, small leather goods, wallets, holdalls, umbrellas) and 25 (footwear, belts, clothing) |
| Owner of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Sergio Rossi SpA |
| Mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Italian trade mark and international registration MISS ROSSI for goods in Class 25, Italian trade mark SERGIO ROSSI for footwear in Class 25, and Community trade mark SERGIO ROSSI for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition allowed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal allowed and opposition refused |
| Pleas in law: | Misapplication of Article 8 of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, inasmuch as the trade marks which are the subject-matter of the contested decision are to be regarded as incompatible with that provision. |

Applicant for registration of the Community trade mark:

Marcorossi Srl.

.

Community trade mark applied for:

Word mark MARCOROSSI — Application for registration No 1 405 869 for goods in Class 18 (bags, cases, small leather goods, wallets, holdalls, umbrellas) and 25 (footwear, belts, clothing)

Owner of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Sergio Rossi SpA

Mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Italian trade mark and international registration MISS ROSSI for goods in Class 25, Italian trade mark SERGIO ROSSI for footwear in Class 25, and Community trade mark SERGIO ROSSI for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition allowed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal allowed and opposition refused

Pleas in law:

Misapplication of Article 8 of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, inasmuch as the trade marks which are the subject-matter of the contested decision are to be regarded as incompatible with that provision.

---
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY

• —TorSECRET

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON 20330

19 May 1976

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Space Policy Committee Meeting, 18 May 1976

REFERENCE: Remote Earth Imagery: Issues and Policy Options

The meeting was held with principals only in Mr. Sisco's

office. Following a brief introduction by Mr. Sisco, he and

Leon Sloss led the discussion through each issue following

the format of the referenced document.

The first issue, relative to declassifying the "fact

of," was resolved unanimously with Option B, which maintains

classification of the "fact of." The only minor negative

comments were by Jack Townsend, NOAA, who did not oppose the

decision, but explained the rationale for declassification.

Relative to expanded civil use of high-resolution imagery,

Issue #2, I made two points which were accepted by the group:

Page 15 of the referenced document introduced a

definition of very high resolution imagery at 5 meters or

better, and high resolution imagery at 5 to 30 meters. I

asked that this definition be removed from the document, in

that it does not tie in with present capabilities which are

all better than 5 meters and, further, that it might lead to

confusion relative to the standards of earlier documents of

10 and 20 meters.

In the referenced document, discussion about the

Committee for Civil Application of Classified Overhead Photography of the U.S. and the proposal to enlarge such civil

use makes no reference to the President's Omnibus Executive

Order 11905 and its "Restrictions," Section V. This order

restricts the operation of surveillance systems within the
U.S., except with special approval by the Attorney General,

I asked that this document be referenced and all consideration for enlarged civil use be in accordance with the Order

and that the Attorney General be consulted. This led to Suboption B 1 being accepted by-the group, modified as follows:

Extend the charter of the Interior-chaired committee to cover

other Federal Agencies users requirements.

Issue #3, Option A, was selected unanimously, changing

the limit from 20 meters to 10 meters. Recommendations #1,

#2, and #3 were accepted unanimously as written.

cc: Dr. Cook, SAF/USS

Gen Shields, SAF/SS

2
EXHIBIT 8.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Operataing Subsidiaries
-----------------------

Flexemessaging Acquisition Ltd incorporated under the laws of Bermuda

         Trade Wind Group Pty Ltd incorporated under the laws of New South
         Wales, Australia

                  Multitone Communications Pty Ltd incorporated under the laws
                  of New South Wales, Australia

                  Trade Wind Marketing Pty Ltd incorporated under the laws of
                  New South Wales, Australia


Non-operating Susidiaries
-------------------------

Trade Wind Technologies Pty Ltd incorporated under the laws of New South Wales,
Australia

PacRim Communications Services Pty Ltd. incorporated under the laws of New South
Wales, Australia

Capricom Pty Ltd incorporated under the laws of New South Wales, Australia

Trade Centre Systems Holdings Pte Ltd incorporated under the laws of Singapore

Trade Centre Systems Pte Ltd incorporated under the laws of Singapore
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 21, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00002

- CR

Larry Donnell GIBBS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015 CRR 001320 D

- 1

Honorable Jos e A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on July 6, 2018

. Appellant was granted three thirty

- day extensions, making his brief due by October 4, 2018. On September 28, 2018, appellant filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record, which raised concerns regarding the completeness of the record on appeal. By order dated October 5, 2018, we abated this cause to

the trial court to address the concerns r aised in appellant’s motion. A supplemental reporter’s record was filed on December 4, 2018, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact was filed on December 10, 2018. On December 18, 2018, the cause was

reinstated on t his court’s docket, and appellant was ordered to file his brief by no later than January 17, 2019. Appellant filed a fifth motion for extension of time to file his brief until February 18, 2019. We granted the fifth motion but advised appellant this was th e final extension of time he would be granted and that if the brief was not filed by February 18, 2019, this appeal

would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing and to consider whether sanctions are appropriate.

On February 19, 2019, app ellant filed a sixth motion for extension of time to file his brief. The motion is DENIED. Appellant’s brief is now due.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A018