alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

MICROSSYSTEMS, INC.

 

 

**Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002)**

 

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that tothe best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

(1)       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/    | A.L. Giannopoulos |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|
| Name:  | A.L. Giannopoulos |   |
| Date:  | May 15, 2003      |   |
|   |              |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                       252
<INVENTORY>                                     11,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,289
<PP&E>                                          49,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,933
<SALES>                                         27,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,057
<CGS>                                           19,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this amendment to the Annual Report onForm 10-K of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 
|   |   | Date: March 17, 2008                                                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                  |
|   |   | /s/ E. KEVIN HRUSOVSKY                                                |
|   |   | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                                                    |
|   |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,617
<SECURITIES>                                     1,113
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,054
<INVENTORY>                                      8,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,883
<PP&E>                                           9,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,989
<SALES>                                         27,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,323
<CGS>                                           21,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    98
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,156)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
# Barnett

- Fort Worth Basin

Rese rvoir Profile

Age: Mississippian, 340 MYA

Lithology: Siliceous Mudstone

Total Area Size (sq mi): 50,000

Total Gas (tcf): 327

GIP (bcf/sq mi): 150

Producable Gas (tcf): 50

Depth (feet): 7,500

Thickness (feet): 300

Horizontal Well Cost ($M): 2.8

Average EUR: 2.65Pressure (psi): 4,000

Temperature (F): 200

Ro: 2.0

TOC (%): 4.5

Porosity (%): 6.0

Matrix Permeability (nD): 250

Pressure Gradient (psi/ft): .526

Clay Content (%): 45

Silica/Calcite/Carbonate (%): 55

Adsorbed Gas (%): 35



# Reservoir Summary

Any understa nding of shale gas reservoirs must start with the pioneering work of

Mitchell/Devon in the Barnett Shale of the Fort Worth Basin in North/Central Texas.

Beginning with vertical wells and a visionary concept in 1981, the Barnett has become

the proving groun d for efficient horizontal well drilling and multi

- stage completions.

With USGS estimates of 327 tcf of gas in place and 50 tcf recoverable, the Barnett has

emerged as the benchmark for all shale gas plays. While reservoir properties range

considerably, th e Mississippian Barnett Shale averages 300 feet in thickness, at an

average depth of about 7500 feet, with average porosities of 6% and low

permeabilities of 250 nanodarcies. Average well production reaches 2.65 bcf, with

initial production rates of up to 13 mmcf per day. Seismic data is generally of

moderate quality, but is essential for tracking the key bounding horizons and

identifying karst "collapse chimneys" which degrade individual well production. Also

worth noting is that vitrinite reflectance aver ages 2% in the Barnett, but drops to the

"oil window" in the northern basin.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1289 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the inclusion of 

certain contractor personnel in matters on the defense acquisition workforce in the annual strategic workforce plan of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the 

inclusion of certain contractor personnel in matters on 

the defense acquisition workforce in the annual strategic 

workforce plan of the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Acquisition 

5 Contractor Workforce Improvement Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1289 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL 

2 IN MATTERS ON THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION 

3 WORKFORCE IN THE ANNUAL STRATEGIC 

4 WORKFORCE PLAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

5 DEFENSE. 

6 (a) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTOR PER7 SONNEL.—Section 115b(d)(1) of title 10, United States 

8 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘including both military and 

9 civilian personnel.’’ and inserting ‘‘including military, ci10 vilian, and contractor personnel that directly support the 

11 acquisition processes of the Department of Defense. For 

12 purposes of this subsection, contractor personnel shall be 

13 treated as directly supporting the acquisition processes of 

14 the Department if, and to the extent that, such contractor 

15 personnel perform functions that, if performed by civilian 

16 personnel, would be make such civilian personnel a part 

17 of the defense acquisition workforce.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact20 ment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to annual 

21 strategic workforce plans of the Department of Defense 

22 submitted to Congress after that date. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### State *v.*Bradley.

The indictment stated, that *Gatling*sued *Herndon,*a constable, and others, for selling his cattle, upon an execution, ata different place from that advertised *;*and that upon the trial of this action in the County Court, it was a materia! question, whether *Gatling*interrupted the constable, in driving the cattle to *Gatling’s*house to be sold and that the Defendant *Bradley*was introduced as a witness, and was sworn, and upon his oath deposed, that *Gatling*lid not interrupt the constable in driving the cattle w> *Gatling’s*house. The evidence was, that Defendant-wore, *Gatling*(lid not assist in driving the cattle front the officer — the falsity of this oath was sufficiently established.

Haywood, Justice.

— I doubt whether we have power to say, the oath sworn by the witness is tantamount to *465that imputed him in the indictment. We cannot imply that one thing; is tantamount, or equivalent, to another, in indictments. Were the Judges allowed this power of implication, they might whenever they thought proper, construe the offence proven to be tantamount or equivalent to that laid in the indictment, when according to stiict propriety and common acceptance, it was essentially different; and a Defendant who had prepared himself to falsify the charge as laid, might find himself sur-prized with evidence constructively tantamount, though not properly and strictly applicable to that charge. I do not recollect any cases upon this head at present — none have been cited — but this case seems to fall under the operation of a general principle, of vast magnitude in a free country, where the law is to govern — a sacred principle never to be evaded, nor ever to be thought of but with reverence, it is the best security the citizen has against judicial tyranny. I hope, therefore, the verdict may be so taken, as to bring this point before, the court. In all other respects I agree, that the Defendant ought to lie found guilty, lie was found guilty, but the verdict was made subject to this point, *et adjournatur.*

*Notb.*— Vide *S. C. post*463.
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08547 

'. 

\~ \~J~ 

AprU 3. 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. John E. Kirk 

Following up on our telephone eonver.ation this afternoon~ this is 

to inform you of tlASA' t plans for handling thre photogr,aph:h: £lopects 

of thill .Apollo 6 mission lehlldulod for launch tomorrow morning. We 

alrO IProc~GH:an3 on tlhr0 ba.ds th<lt your menoranciwn of M.ucih 28 ~ 1968 

(BYI 12881/68) &u'ld tl'Hl 1'31,Qv>1nt Qltce1"pt of the 303 Committe<9 minutes 

(BYE 11022/68) approve acqu1r1na the photography 89 plQnn~d. The 

enclo6ed doeum~ntation covers the spaco photography reviow procesl 

wa hav€! developod with Mrs Tidwell', office; thi6 9hould meat the 

conc~rns Dr. Fbx e:qlro3i1J~d 1n his mamonndum of Ma11"«:1\ 12 (BYE 12849/68). 

Dr. N~al1 has a~ke~ that you inform Dr. P08ter of the NASA planning 

in this ~rea. 

Attachments 

0NCLJRRENC[S: DW: jr/4-3-68 OFFICIAL FILE COl'Y 

OI=I=IC~ COD~ .. 

S'GNATUR~ .. 

DAn ~ - _. ---._ .. _- A~ '\ Form 1267 (Nov. (5) * u. S. Government Printing Offlco: 1967-273-514 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08547 

, 

I 

I 

I 

J 

j 

I 

J 

j 

I 

j 

, 

r 

l 

j 

l 

r 

j
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35904]


Bogalusa Bayou Railroad, L.L.C. d/b/a Geaux Geaux Railroad--
Operation Exemption--Geaux Geaux Railroad, LLC

    Bogalusa Bayou Railroad, L.L.C. d/b/a Geaux Geaux Railroad (BBRR), 
a Class III rail carrier indirectly controlled by Watco Holdings, Inc., 
has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to 
operate approximately 21.95 miles of rail line (the Lines) owned by 
Geaux Geaux Railroad, LLC (GGRL), located: (1) Between milepost 0.00 at 
or near Slaughter, and milepost 9.69 at or near Zee, and (2) between 
milepost 345.84 at or near Slaughter, and milepost 358.10 at or near 
Maryland, in East Baton Rouge Parish, La.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ GGRL was granted authority to acquire the Lines in Geaux 
Geaux Railroad--Acquisition & Operation Exemption--Illinois Central 
Railroad, FD 35826 (STB served May 23, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BBRR states it has entered into an operating agreement with GGRL 
and that the agreement does not contain any provision that prohibits 
BBRR from interchanging, or limits BBRR's ability to interchange, 
traffic with a third party. BBRR also states that operation of the 
Lines will not result in significant changes in carrier operations.
    BBRR certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class 
II or Class I rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    The transaction may be consummated on or after February 28, 2015, 
the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice 
was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than February 20, 
2015 (at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 35904, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each 
pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Ball Janik LLP, 655 Fifteenth 
St. NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
``www.stb.dot.gov.''

    Decided: February 9, 2015.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2015-03011 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR TO DATE FOUND ON PAGES 3-6 INCLUSIVE OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR
THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          97,086
<SECURITIES>                                     3,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,342
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,399
<PP&E>                                         137,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,952
<SALES>                                        270,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,579
<CGS>                                          177,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               169,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (87,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (87,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (87,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)
        

</TABLE>
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-18-2006

USA v. Kiam

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-1384

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Kiam" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1670.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1670
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-1384

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

LONG TONG KIAM

Appellant

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal No. 04-cr-0436)

District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell

 

Argued December 5, 2005

Before: RENDELL, FISHER, and VAN ANTWERPEN, 

Circuit Judges

 

 ORDER AMENDING OPINION

 

VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above

case filed January 3, 2006, be amended as follows:

On page 2, line 36; page 3, line 2; page 3, line 8; and page

9, line 2, “Customs and Border Patrol” should be “Customs and
2

Border Protection.”

By the Court,

/s/ Franklin S. Van Antwerpen

Circuit Judge

Dated: January 18, 2006
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 573/2006

of 6 April 2006         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 31 March to 6 April 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005 p. 11).

(2)OJ L 335, 21.12.2005, p. 4.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
•

•

•

.

. .

••• • •

•

If!? OM

ma VI

121.10.21. MU •

•

, • WI SYNC •

on, -

PASS

ivervearmw ine ins -

OW In 011111111111.

rat Pitmen,. WHAM W PRISACTCO 01 CeatiL !PAWN

IWNE NAVE MI RECO, MCI IN OM ONSRACTON

PERSONNEL NAVE SWIM !OMR OFFICIN.S TO VISIT SIM mums mums. raxmai.

1W ItNITATI(NS OR OM ME MU INTIelf

MY PRIOR MOIL41106 Ir I I I OM fir IN

Oa WIN NOL MUM NtO MAT NO

0183tINCL

PAAllagiis

POI NOT OILY ATEO MTM TIC

NtO CAN Ma PIRTIOIPATT ATM WITH

WORM= TNtaION W111 Tar NtO

TINEUDI THE SPECIONINISININJNIONUM

oteroessz rat THE PRWOOr. IIOUSTRIA.

scum" mum. wawa TIC TO ASSURE

11411 Freezer IWMATION NO num Mgt MS

COMM IS OISOLOND OPLT TO AtMOtIM) PERSONS NO

IS LIMITED TO 11‘ YIMt4 ISMIDI or PEOPLE Onvela.

ro, MACAW, NO SECURE PERFORNANCE or 'DE ONIMAOt % THE VISIT MeV Rams S. IPPLICS TO ALL

FACILITICS 00 MOM tot lempfteautsre

COINIZANY: OF SOPSP. - •

Mara VISITS

CO U. VISITS OF 1IMPRONUIA APPLIATED

CONIRACTet a OOPENINENt PEOPLE MICH IINCLVES

MEM TO VIM 'ammo, OPERATIONS Ot INFOONe

TIM MAST OE INNVIWILLY MO Inaricau IMMO

W

(2) *MCAT FM APPROVAL W pawn

.• .

Vir7 1 COPY
•

•

. : •

• •

ab

O

•

...:••••i •

PACE 3 mace Si,* 10 1-S-E-0-11-E4 •

VISITS WUST ICIMFYFY Tat VISITCRIS, PRIEM ACCESSES.

2."'AIIWIR 'FILIATION PURPOSE OF VISIT AM OATEISI Or VISIT....

:g MEWS mu. E morns AT txmcr SEVEN DAYS IN ADVNICE

TO sP.3 AN) VC PROM OFFICE TO ILLISI kiZIE

CMOVIINATI FLAMM APO TIE ATTEICANIE Cr AN

soyRETFesiverrwr, tr watufreX

CLITGOINS VISITS

C 10 ALL *MOM VISITS TO NNI4R011111

6:0fF111 ATED CONTACTOI CR WNIYONDE ACTIVITIES

Am Parte NOE SAFSP PIKUECT INTONATION It=

TO K' Mom, at love SIFIP MOAN ax**

:1.3 VA! !E NE10034p RILL SE SWIM° TO sp. AT VAST

SEVEN DAYS IN Came or TIE PROPOSED VISIT • WITH

"AM JUSTIFICATION NIMES, PROVUU ACCESSES Re

WWII{ ATI*. OF MS= TO FE VISITE%

C?) ILL VISITS TO IVAININTON 1162301W

VISITS TO THE NtO# UPC TIC CRITERIA OF %CD MUST

FE PROM, AS IN/1M1 IN III%

AtirSTIOS CR OWLICIII OONCONIPC TINS MACY

SWALE) !IE MOM AT&T ADORE TO SP.%

E•P IWRIEY

ZaT.Irm

NON .371011

11 •

"

Ca

8:171:11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. JOSEPH NEWMAN, JR., Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 178 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.