alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                       206
<INVENTORY>                                      9,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,915
<PP&E>                                          59,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,613
<BONDS>                                         29,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              250
<PREFERRED>                                        153
<COMMON>                                        18,526
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,666
<SALES>                                         22,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,510
<CGS>                                           17,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,037
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
COPT 71 61:_a_ _COPIES 

FLGE__L_OF_L_PAGES 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 Not'rember 2015 TOP SECRET liar* 112 13YEMAN 

Communications Section, Deputy 

for Satellite Operations 

-(S),NRO Staff 

NCOIC: CMSgt Dona Robitaille 

Backup: SSgt MacCallum 

SSgt Paulk 

SSgt Chamberland 

Assistants: AIC Cleunnons 

MC Gellinger 

A1C Herman 

A1C Hopkine 

A1C Monk 

MC Willard 

A2C Hagen 

Duty Subjects: 

Responsible to Deputy for Satellite Operations,-(6)-NRO Staff for providing communications and data transmission services in support of &Hips,- 

NRP satellite operations assigned. Additionally, responsible to the Deputy for 

Satellite Operations for providing special communications services to entire 

-(6)-NRO Staff and DNRO, within existing capabilities. 

Action Items: 

a. Responsible for operation of all installed equipment (includes 

all cryptographic, communication, data transmission: Univac 1004. Autodin, 

and facsimile recorders). 

b. Responsible for condition (cleanliness, state of repair. 

security, fire watch) of all installed commons, data transmission, 

facsimile equipment and the entire communications area. 

c. Provides a minimum of two qualified communications airmen 

to man the SOC communications section at all times--7 days per week, 24 hours 

per day. Provide additional communications support as may be necessary during 

peak periods. 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2815 6r_F:Arcl. 

d. Maintain close liaison with supply and maintenance support 

agencies, both commercial and military. to insure rapid response to maintenance requirements and continued updating of communications equipment. 

e. Performs continual message traffic and procedure Analysis 

to maintain efficiency of terminal and relay operations. 

f. Acts as focal point for all other communications services in 

SOC, e.g. telephones , tubes , speakers intercom, etc. 

g. Provides telephone answering services for entire SOC during 

other than normal duty hours except when missions are in progress and operations sergeants are on duty. 

h. Responsible for shredding, bagging and disposition of all 

SS-4 classified material. 

kii` SECRET
Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ JOHN V. GENOVAJohn V. GenovaPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
# Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) (9/10) Standard Document(46.71 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) Overview(164.38 KB)

Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) CPPE(25.59 KB)

Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) Network Effects Diagram(52.56 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Wetland Restoration

This video explores how Nathan Hudson in Laurel, DE, is using this practice to return farmland to its original condition as a wetland, providing wildlife habitat and improving water quality.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We have issued ourreport dated February 21, 2005 except for Note R, as to which the date isNovember 17, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements includedin the Annual Report of Channell Commercial Corporation on Form 10-K/A-1 for theyear ended December 31, 2004.  We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatement of Channell Commercial Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-36097,effective September 19, 1997).

 

 
| /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| November 17, 2005      |

 

----
# October 27 Webinar: Addressing Water Quality Outcomes Through Nutrient and Water Management

Water

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  October 27 Webinar: Addressing Water Quality Outcomes Through Nutrient and Water Management 

On October 27 at 1:00 p.m. eastern, Dr. Kevin King of USDA’s Agricultural Research Service will present on the science that supports water quality outcomes that can be achieved through SMART nutrient and water management strategies.

## Registration

This virtual event will be hosted on Microsoft Teams. No registration is required.

Access Instructions to Join

In March of 2022, NRCS released a Conservation Effects Assessment Project report that revealed national increases in subsurface nitrogen and soluble phosphorus lost to the environment over a 10-year period. NRCS recently emphasized its commitment to helping farmers implement SMART nutrient management planning. This includes the 4Rs of nutrient stewardship (right Source, right Method, right Rate and right Timing) and emphasizes smart activities to reduce nutrient loss by assessment of comprehensive, site-specific conditions.

On October 27 at 1:00 p.m. eastern, Dr. Kevin King of USDA’s Agricultural Research Service will present on the science that supports water quality outcomes that can be achieved through SMART nutrient and water management strategies. 

No registration is required. Visit the Conservation Outcomes Webinar Series webpage for access instructions.
Motion Granted; Order filed December 6, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01049-CV

____________

JAMES L. DOYLE, Appellant

V.

FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-45728

ORDER

On November 29, 2012, the parties notified this court that they are attempting to

reach an agreement to settle the issues on appeal, and requested that the appeal be abated 

for completion of the settlement. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the 

following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active 

docket until February 4, 2013. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket 

at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive 
motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed 

by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
# C_2005132EN.01003401.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/34

---

Action brought on 30 March 2005 by EARL Salvat Père et Fils and Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-136/05)

(2005/C 132/61)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 March 2005 by EARL Salvat Père et Fils, established in Saint-Paul de Fenouillet (France), Comité interprofessionnel des vins doux naturels et vins de liqueur à appellations contrôlées (CIVDN), established in Perpignan (France), and Comité national des interprofessionnels des vins à appellation d'origine, established in Paris (France), represented by Hugues Calvet and Olivier Billard, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Articles 1.1 and 1.3 of the Commission's decision of 19 January 2005 concerning the ‘Plan Rivesaltes’ and the CIVDN parafiscal levies implemented by France; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Articles 1.1 and 1.3 of the Commission's decision of 19 January 2005 concerning the ‘Plan Rivesaltes’ and the CIVDN parafiscal levies implemented by France;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested decision the Commission concluded that the set-aside premium per hectare financed by an inter-trade contribution in the context of the ‘Plan Rivesaltes’ and the promotional and operational activities of the controlled designations of origin ‘Rivesaltes’, ‘Grand Rousillon’, ‘Muscat de Rivesaltes’ and ‘Banyuls’ financed by inter-trade contributions constituted State aid within the meaning of Article 87 EC.

The applicants seek for that decision to be annulled, submitting first that its statement of reasons is inadequate, in breach of Article 253 EC, and does not enable the applicants to understand the Commission's reasons for considering that the criteria relating to State aid defined in the case-law of the Court of Justice were satisfied in this case. The applicants also submit that the contested decision resulted from a breach of Article 87 EC, since the Commission did not show either that the measures in question were financed by means made available to the national authorities or that the inter-trade contributions, intended to finance the promotional and operational activities of the controlled designations of origin, were attributable to the State.

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1157 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to consider 

Brunswick County, North Carolina to be part of the same metropolitan 

statistical area as Wilmington, North Carolina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget to consider Brunswick County, North Carolina 

to be part of the same metropolitan statistical area as 

Wilmington, North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRUNSWICK COUNTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purpose of the delineation of metropoli6 tan statistical areas, the Director of the Office of Manage7 ment and Budget shall consider Brunswick County, North 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1157 IS

1 Carolina to be part of the same metropolitan statistical 

2 area that contains Wilmington, North Carolina. 

3 (b) SUNSET.—Subsection (a) shall cease to be effec4 tive on January 1, 2021. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1160

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

John Lee Sanders, also known as * Southern District of Iowa. 

Tommy Wayne McCullough, * [Unpublished]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 20, 2000

 Filed: July 28, 2000 

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Lee Sanders appeals the district court’s1 sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to drug trafficking, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At sentencing, the

district court departed downward, agreeing with Sanders that his criminal history

category overstated the seriousness of his criminal history, but declined to depart under

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.16, p.s. (1998) based on Sanders’s postarrest disclosure of certain additional drugs hidden in his home. While noting it had
-2-

discretion to depart under section 5K2.16, the district court found that Sanders already

had been credited for his disclosure as the additional drugs were not considered in

establishing his base offense level, and that Sanders’s case did not fall outside the

heartland. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), filing a brief in which he raises the issue whether the district court

erred in denying Sanders a downward departure for his disclosure. Sanders has not

filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude counsel’s argument is

unreviewable. See United States v. Correa, 167 F.3d 414, 417 (8th Cir. 1999) (denial

of downward departure unreviewable where district court considered defense’s

arguments, found no extraordinary circumstances warranting departure, and did not

indicate it lacked authority to depart); United States v. Field, 110 F.3d 587, 591 (8th

Cir. 1997) (discretionary decision not to depart downward from Guidelines is

unreviewable on appeal absent unconstitutional motive).

In accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have reviewed the

record for any non-frivolous issues and have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2005123EN.01001302.xml

| 21.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/13

---

Corrigendum to calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 116 of 18 May 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 116 of 18 May 2005

(2005/C 123/11)

On page 24, point 8, table, strategic objective 2.5.12, the figure ‘40’ is inserted in the last column.

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Pegasus
Communications Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K/A"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: December 20, 2004

/s/  Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
----------------------------
Name:  Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
Title: Chief Financial Officer





                                       9
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies as of the August 14, 2002 to the UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, as follows:

1.     The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intelligent Systems Corporation
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 which accompanies this statement fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Intelligent Systems Corporation.



| | /s/ Bonnie L. Herron                     
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Bonnie L. Herron,
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------



            [Letterhead of McDaniel & Associates Consultants Limited]



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

We refer to our report evaluating the crude oil and natural gas reserves
attributable to PetroKazakhstan Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2004
(the "Report").

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and our Report in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and that we have
no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained in it that are derived from the Report or that are within our
knowledge as a results of the services we performed in connection with such
Report.

Sincerely,

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.


By: /s/ B.H. Emslie
    --------------------------------
    Name:  B.H. Emslie, P. Eng.
    Title: Senior Vice President

    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Dated: March 30, 2005
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Brush Management, Critical Area Planting, Fence, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# C_2005019EN.01003202.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/32

---

Action brought on 9 November 2004 by the CO-FRUTTA Soc. coop. a r.l. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-446/04)

(2005/C 19/67)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 November 2004 by CO-FRUTTA Soc. coop. a r.l., represented by Wilma Viscardini and Gabriele Donà.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, pursuant to Article 230 EC, the decision contained in the letter of the Secretary General of the European Commission dated 10 August 2004 (SG/B/2/MM/tf D (2004) 7079), substantially rejecting the confirmatory application – submitted by Co-Frutta by letter of 3 May 2004 – for access to the documents containing data for 1998, 1999 and 2000 relating to operators registered in the Community to import bananas (WTO – bananas); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, pursuant to Article 230 EC, the decision contained in the letter of the Secretary General of the European Commission dated 10 August 2004 (SG/B/2/MM/tf D (2004) 7079), substantially rejecting the confirmatory application – submitted by Co-Frutta by letter of 3 May 2004 – for access to the documents containing data for 1998, 1999 and 2000 relating to operators registered in the Community to import bananas (WTO – bananas);

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of its complaints, the applicant submits that the Commission could no longer adopt the contested decision given that an (implied) decision rejecting the confirmatory application had already been taken by reason of the absence of a reply.

Furthermore, the applicant puts forwards other arguments largely the same as those in the action brought in Case T-355/04 (OJ C 262 of 23 October 2004).

---