alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States

Department of

Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

Get Started with NRCS

Do you farm or ranch and want to make improvements to the land that you own or lease? 

Natural Resources Conservation Service offers technical and financial assistance to help farmers, ranchers and forest landowners.

To get started with NRCS, 

we recommend you stop by 

your local NRCS field office. 

We’ll discuss your vision for your land. 

NRCS provides landowners with free technical assistance, or 

advice, for their land. Common technical assistance includes: 

resource assessment, practice design and resource monitoring. 

Your conservation planner will help you determine if financial 

assistance is right for you. 

We’ll walk you through the 

application process. To get 

started on applying for 

financial assistance, we’ll work with you:

• To fill out an AD 1026, which ensures a conservation 

plan is in place before lands with highly erodible soils 

are farmed. It also ensures that identified wetland areas 

are protected.

• To meet other eligibility certifications.

Once complete, we’ll work with you on the application, 

or CPA 1200.

Applications for most programs are accepted on a continuous 

basis, but they’re considered for funding in different ranking 

periods. Be sure to ask your local NRCS district conservationist 

about the deadline for the ranking period to ensure you turn 

in your application in time.

As part of the application 

process, we’ll check to see if 

you are eligible. 

To do this, you’ll need to bring:

• An official tax ID (Social Security number or an 

employer ID)

• A property deed or lease agreement to show you 

have control of the property; and

• A farm tract number.

If you don’t have a farm tract number, you can get one from 

USDA’s Farm Service Agency. Typically, the local FSA office 

is located in the same building as the local NRCS office. You 

only need a farm tract number if you’re interested in financial 

assistance.

NRCS will take a look at the 

applications and rank them 

according to local resource 

concerns, the amount of conservation benefits the work will 

provide and the needs of applicants.

If you’re selected, you can choose 

whether to sign the contract for 

the work to be done. 

Once you sign the contract, you’ll be provided standards and specifications for completing the practice or practices, and then you 

will have a specified amount of time to implement. Once the work 

is implemented and inspected, you’ll be paid the rate of compensation for the work if it meets NRCS standards and specifications.

To find out more, go to: www.nrcs.usda.gov/GetStarted

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
# C_2004273EN.01002802.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/28

---

Action brought on 21 June 2004 by Alain Crespinet against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-261/04)

(2004/C 273/56)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 June 2004 by Alain Crespinet, resident in Rosières (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision awarding his priority points for the 2003 promotions exercise and the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade A5 in the same exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision awarding his priority points for the 2003 promotions exercise and the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade A5 in the same exercise;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the present case, the applicant objects to the refusal by the appointing authority of the institution to promote him to grade A5 in the 2003 promotions exercise, following the awarding, for that exercise, of an insufficient number of priority points to attain the points threshold necessary to be taken into consideration for a promotion.

The applicant alleges the following in support of his action:

| — | infringement of Articles 5, 7 and 26 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Articles 5, 7 and 26 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | infringement of Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations and the appurtenant general provisions for implementing them; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations and the appurtenant general provisions for implementing them;

| — | infringement of the principle of correlation between grade and position; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of the principle of correlation between grade and position;

| — | infringement of the principle of career development; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of the principle of career development;

| — | infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination.

The applicant alleges in particular that the awarding of one point per year in the grade, as provided for in Article 12(3) of the general provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, rewards grade seniority of officials eligible for promotion without taking account of their actual merit as demonstrated by them during those years and in relation to which the staff reports were drawn up.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                         June 12, 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2229) entitled ``An Act to amend title 5, United States Code, to 
provide permanent authority for judicial review of certain Merit 
Systems Protection Board decisions relating to whistleblowers, and for 
other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            On page 2, after line 16, insert the following:

            (c) Retroactive effective date.--The amendments made by 
        this section shall take effect as if enacted on November 26, 
        2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 2229

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 COS114 705 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14000034690 

OXCART 

.1, ~O ~r_~ of 4 J'~ 1";' w _JruVii~~t 

r~~po_.U~111t:.1for ·l'itlG.IO!~J va:. ttau;:f.u~d fr. 

':roar •• to .~op_ D.. 1. _b.~'1~At fU •.• ~,dl\i;ln~ 

with r~n~ral Car~~~ I bav~ ~~afti~~ tb1~ ~~~~~~$ 

.'4 it lti_~._ -.t:$efl ~'t • t,T~Mltl~a '~:t'1~(l 11: 

r~j~\.d.l·~d '* 

e_~ It!>t: tM ill:l'ectC'!i:'. Isro.s.r- D !1.aaii:~~jJill. 

th:l$ tr;i1Mf~tte(l r~s~11d,.lit7i\t Q)lcD~l II .. e" Wile~ 

11i det<lile\\i to .'O;;d& with J1ri!\~tor ~ hOir- ~ it· ~t11 

r~"'Iit¥~r l'6l.. It iJ!l ~J&p$(\:tad ~t by tMt d~t~ 

all iiiet3.11~ f#f th~ t;r~te·it ~'_ bfi (;~1ef;~dl.» 

~$<i"I>1i"":il1"Ic.t .~iW.' 't.lr_~ .. tf1 ...!''IIi ..~ ·iI.: .. 1I ~""""l$~$."lI!. (j; ...... ~~WI! 

Dil".~t..1" 

~Jit~Mllt~~o_a,ilJ,,_e~ 

ec : S~cv.:'~t;; • ..17 ~lf_~~ 

ID®p Sfi:~~~ta:tY Gf ~_fii)~t~i$ 

(~~(l'br~l ~t~r 

.:;;5 d! 

<?JS- J S; 

. rr F'" I i-landie via B~'EMAN 

.J Control m i EXGUJDED F'tL~,~j f:,iY;.°Y:j';,TIG lL::::\') ,O:[]; l 

, DOD DIR, 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY ; 

i~~~.F~"-~;r;;.~~....,..,......N!IW~~ 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 COS114 705
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 6 April 2006         

amending Decision 2005/393/EC as regards the restricted zones in relation to bluetongue in Spain

(notified under document number C(2006) 1262)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/273/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue (1), and in particular Article 8(3)(c) and the third paragraph of Article 19 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC, in the part for Zone C,

                  ‘Spain

Islas Baleares (where serotype 16 is absent)’,

is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 April 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.

(2)OJ L 130, 24.5.2005, p. 22. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/828/EC (OJ L 311, 26.11.2005, p. 37).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001003390
<NAME>                        FIRST SOUTH AFRICA CORP., LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           3,471,422
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                    8,924,132
<ALLOWANCES>                       481,225
<INVENTORY>                      4,984,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                17,601,000
<PP&E>                          13,145,569
<DEPRECIATION>                   3,519,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  33,981,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           13,600,750
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            41,805
<OTHER-SE>                      16,039,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    33,981,825
<SALES>                         25,807,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                25,807,141
<CGS>                            9,241,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   23,294,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (510,601)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 574,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,449,046
<INCOME-TAX>                       622,555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1,826,491
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,826,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.38
        


</TABLE>
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)National Source Tracking System (NSTS)

# Help Desk Support for the National Source Tracking System

NRC has established a Help Desk to assist users by answering questions and resolving issues related to credentialing, login procedures, system use, transaction reporting, and any problems encountered in using the NSTS. Users may also contact the Help Desk to submit system change requests (to remedy defects or enhance functionality). Each inquiry is logged and tracked for future reference. Help Desk availability is as follows:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 28, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - NSTS Login
          - National Source Tracking System: Blog
          - NSTS Overview
          - Background
          - Get Credentialed to Access NSTS
          - How to Report to NSTS
          - Resources  for Online Reporting
          - NSTS Expansion
          - Annual Inventory Reconciliation
          - NSTS Presentations
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Help Desk Support
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 28, 2022
#### Preuhs and wife, Respondents, vs. Coates and wife, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Farr & MacLeod*of Eau Claire.

For the respondents: *Roy P. Wilcox*of Eau Claire and *Carl E. Peterson*and *Ira 0. Slocumb*of Menomonie.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/28 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
AltiGen Communications, Inc.
  ****Date: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Gilbert
      HuGilbert
      HuChief
      Executive Officer
### FDMS Docket No. FAA - 2013 - 0459
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>               0000350194 
<NAME>              UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC
       
<S>                                <C>          <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS        3-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1997   DEC-31-1996    DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-1997   MAR-31-1996    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                            100323             0          67252   
<SECURITIES>                           0             0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     266683             0         253692   
<ALLOWANCES>                           0             0              0 
<INVENTORY>                            0             0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  367580             0         321223
<PP&E>                            102380             0         115738
<DEPRECIATION>                     39782         77218              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1283255             0        1278480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1124342             0        1110927
<BONDS>                            50000             0          50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0             0              0
<PREFERRED>                       130000             0         205000
<COMMON>                         4327857             0        3796975
<OTHER-SE>                             0             0              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1283255             0        1278480
<SALES>                            78503         78679              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  458479        526158              0
<CGS>                              33072         16339              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     463997        555858              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     900          1273              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0             0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1393          2542              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0             0              0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0             0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0             0              0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0             0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0             0              0
<CHANGES>                              0             0              0
<NET-INCOME>                       (6418)       (30973)             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0             0              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0             0              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1997
<CASH>                                       7,912,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,435,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,892,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 26,615,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,937,000
<PP&E>                                       4,335,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,618,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,014,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,719,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,691,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,014,000
<SALES>                                     25,981,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,981,000
<CGS>                                       20,052,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,052,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,203,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,979,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   776,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,167,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,167,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Millennium
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Garrett L. Thomas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


December 16, 2002                            /s/ Garrett L. Thomas
                                             ---------------------
                                             Garrett L. Thomas
                      President and Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Millennium
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Ronald J. Corsentino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


December 16, 2002                            /s/ Ronald J. Corsentino
                                             ------------------------
                                             Ronald J. Corsentino
                                             Chief Financial Officer
#### D. B. DOUGHERTY v. JOHN F. LOGAN.

T3ie lien on land acquired by a docketed judgment shall not be lost in favor of a judgment subsequently docketed, unless the plaintiff in the latter take out execution and give the plaintiff in the former twenty days notice before the day of sale by the sheriff, and the plaintiff so notified shall fail to take out execution and put it into the sherff’s hands before the day of sale. Rule 19 — 63 N. 0. Rep. 669.

*{Perry*v. Morris, 65 N. C. Rep. 221, cited and approved.)

This was a MotioN to bis licuor, *Judge Mitchell,*at Spring Term, 1813, of Asms Superior Court, for directions as to the application of certain moneys arising from- the sale of land under executions.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

*W. P.*Caldwell, for the plaintiff.

*Folie <& Armfield*and *Busbee*c6 Busbee, contra.

Settle, J.

The sheriff of Ashe county asks the direction of the Court as to the application of money in his hands, arising from the sale of land under three executions, one in favor of Jacob Roten, another in favor of John Shatley, and a third in favor of D. B. Dougherty. The judgments, on which the three executions issued, and also a judgment in favor of one Long, had been regularly docketed in the Superior Court of Ashe county ; the judgments in favor of Roten and Shatley before, and that in favor of Dougherty after the docketing of the judgment in favor of Long.

No execution had issued on the judgment in favor of Long. The land did not bring enough to pay all the judgments.

The question presented for decision is not an open one.

We have held in *Perry*v. *Morris,*65 N. C. Rep. *221,*that the lien on the land of the defendant, acquired by a docketed judgment, shall not be lost in favor of a judgment subsequently docketed, unless the plaintiff in the latter take out ex*559ecution and give the plaintiff in the former twenty days notice before the day of sale by the sheriff, and the plaintiff so noticed shall fail to take out execution and put it into the sheriff’s hands before the day of sale, as is prescribed in the 19th Rule of Practice adopted by the Supreme Court, 63 N. C. Rep. 669. Dougherty having.failed to quicken the diligence ot Long by the notice required in the Rule, there is error in the order directing the application of the fund to the satisfaction of the execution in favor of Dougherty, to the exclusion of the judgment in favor of Long.

The fund should be applied to the satisfaction of the judgments in the order, in point of time, in which they are entered on the docket.

Let this be certified.

Retí CueiaM. Judgernent accordingly.