alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005143EN.01001303.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 28 April 2005

in Case C-329/04: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2000/43/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 143/18)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-329/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and H. Kreppel) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: C.-D Quassowski) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 29 July 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, P. Kūris and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 April 2005, in which it:

| (1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| (2) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 25. 09. 2004.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1198 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1198

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude certain medical 
        sources of evidence in making disability determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2015

Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude certain medical 
        sources of evidence in making disability determinations.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving the Integrity of 
Disability Evidence Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN MEDICAL SOURCES OF EVIDENCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(d)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(d)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(C)(i) In making any determination with respect to whether an 
individual is under a disability or continues to be under a disability, 
the Commissioner of Social Security may not consider (except for good 
cause as determined by the Commissioner) any evidence furnished by--
            ``(I) any individual or entity who has been convicted of a 
        felony under section 208 or under section 1632;
            ``(II) any individual or entity who has been excluded from 
        participation in any Federal health care program under section 
        1128; or
            ``(III) any person with respect to whom a civil money 
        penalty or assessment has been imposed under section 1129 for 
        the submission of false evidence.
    ``(ii) To the extent and at such times as is necessary for the 
effective implementation of clause (i) of this subparagraph--
            ``(I) the Inspector General of the Social Security 
        Administration shall transmit to the Commissioner information 
        relating to persons described in subclause (I) or (III) of 
        clause (i);
            ``(II) the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
        transmit to the Commissioner information relating to persons 
        described in subclause (II) of clause (i); and''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall issue 
regulations to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to determinations of disability made on or after the 
earlier of--
            (1) the effective date of the regulations required to be 
        issued by the Commissioner of Social Security under subsection 
        (b); or
            (2) the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
t 

THE NAO STAFF 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 

IBP SECRET 

-fflt NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

June 28, 1973 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MURPHY, ss-4 

SUBJECT: Reporting of NRP Launch Activities 

HANClt f: VIA (:-, BYEMAN...., !." 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Reference General Bradburn' s memorandum to you, same 

subject, March 7, 1972. That memorandum established a list 

of DOD personnel to be notified following each NRP launch. 

Please add to this list the Assistant Secretary of the 

Air Force for Research and Development (SAFRD). The person 

to whom the notification is to be delivered is the Executive 

Officer, 

OHN E. KULPA, 

Brigadier General, USAF 

Director 

HANDLE VIA CLASSIFIED BY BYEMAN 1 EXEMPT FROM . 

By EM AN GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF TO p : s EC R ET EXECUTIVE OrlOER 1166l EXEMPTIONCAU· 

co NT ROL s vsT EM aoAv &ei oecLASSIFY oN 1"'App;oved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 

coNTROL No Internal 

COPY Of COPIES 

f'AGE_LoF _L PAGES 
• I' ......... ., .. ..,. ....... Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 . -· ------- . 

-tSt" NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

BYEMAN 

CONTJIIOL SY STEM 

THE NRO STAFF 7 March 1972 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MJRPHY, SS-4' 

SUBJECT: Reporting of NRP Launch Activities 

Reference my attached memo to Dr. McLucas. Please 

establish a procedure for notification of the following 

key DOD personnel after each NRP launch: 

. ; Fo5 c • 

d. 

g. 

r::i':,.;; h. 

i. 

j. 

Secretary of Defense 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 

Air Force Secretary 

Air Force Under Secretary 

Air Force Chief of Staff 

Air Force Vice Chief of Staff 

DCS/R&D 

Director of Space 

Commander, AFSC 

Commander, SAMSO 

Your plan should be in the form of a Standard Operating 

Procedure. It should include 

a. The name of the person responsible for making each 

notification. 

b. A record of the time of accomplishment of each 

notification. 

c. Criteria for reporting routire launches in very 

little detail and launch failures in more detail. Include at 

least: 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL !SYSTEM 

Project name 

Successfully launched (or not) 

✓ Mission payload status (initial) 

,/ Facts about any launch failure. 

TBP SECRET EXCLUDED ,~o,; AUTOIIHtC UCRA01~• 

noo OIRECTlVE $,ZOO.to OOES N'O:T APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 

CONTROL NO, ______ Internal _ 

r 
"'Pftft ftl"'ftftl"'"'P KlMOl( YI_A 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 BYEMAN 

CONUOl S V STI M 

Please brief me on your notification plan when it is 

ready. 

Attachment 

Brad to McL 22Feb72 

BYEMAN 

CO~TROC. SWST[M 

Colonel, 

TOP SECRET E::X:CkUJ,H;iO FROM! AUT0144flC IUGJIAO!NiG 

000 OlUCTIYE UOO 10 OOES NOT H,lV 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140967 

COHfROL NO _______ _ 

COPV ____ or ____ COPIU 

,AH 2 or 2 FlGU
.... .. :::.: -4. . •

—j—ecrilroarRoat AuroYATic REG •_

AP job ebb. . To, ....; • .. .....Tv -- ON a ..„,ty

•

.

.• • •••::

. •

...... .

ihl

26 Dec eritiposaber 1962

Col Worthman/me

liga•A =strand=

1 Addre

Joseph Y. Cher2

Director 3

(8) National Rea

r

•

MEMORANDUM TOR MIL McCRIORGIN SUNDT

SUBJECT: 'review of the-M)-11stitima1 Recommiessece Program

prom time to time the-411)-Nothmel Reconnaissance Office is

approached by representatives at various governmental activittes who

wish to schedule "an ~all review of surveillease programs. "

These requests are based on sincere motives mad simally stem from

a perfectly lord charter to cot sock stadia'.

When the segmenting activity is part at the Defense Department,

we have experieneed are difflear ss ornaiglag ter mosellation of the

survey. However, when the arstivityis nos-Debase. for esalloPloa the

Net Evaluation IIIPAConuldttee at the National Secority Council, it is

somewhat awkward for the Defense Department to explain that the

1T10-111atioesl Recomnelessume Program is already under adequate

review. Clearly, such certification should come from autskle the

Department coder review and tram ammease who knows that the program to actually reviewed by the highest levels d the lbaecuthw Mee.

I would Wm to propose an arrangement =dhoti:tag us to refer

these non-Defense survey molests to your office for evaluation. I

realise that there could well be some instances where a review would

be desirable; however. when this is not the case, a word at reassurance from you or your representative would help avoid a duplication

of the existing review structure sad activity.

Copy AZ of.—..4) Copies -

Page___I_of • Pairos.

Control No....PiHte.—

rs •n •••• -am

t

pm%

; Lie iu
• ••n•••• •••••• •••••1 ••••••

•

.• • ltD

. • ,

•

.

• •

• I

dr. •*.

•

---••••••••••• • •••.--- :•1

•• •••"..)

V ,

•

aw•

• •

.. • '

.1111nPm..;

. E45 .11a 12 56

SAFSS / 7 7 7

i '

OTTA443

P•27•:2

ZE

EIGHT ZERO

O

C) ::1111 REFERME TO

FIELD

T. WC4A HAVZ ECEn Discussito =EMIT Ti41C4 TZ

IIRTEn3 HEX THAT TIT 

CMCERU HAS Can EME SSEC 11 OCUE DESICATIOR OF TH E O IRECTOR S ,

OU

A

 Dt

0 ZSPC*41ZLE FM THE 011EC4 CF ELD FSPE

OPERATIO35 CLD INTEPP2ZTEO TO 1XCLO3

TIO

E THOSE PRESE•T• ACTIV1T1ES L; "ER

CPERATIOn.

AT TSE 4P FACILITYN 

SPECIF ICALLY RECARM O ox—eam CAmERA

IT IS 1Y REMLECTIC4 14 OOR Discussion on THIS SU3JECT THAT AZ.IEC3 TeT VSULn nor ALTER PRESE1T morznin: FUZTIC:IS OF THE AP Fa:MURES

FACILITY AND-THAT CY FIELD CP:IATI:%3 YOU ;ERE E

PART E ICULARLY =Ma ARCOT LAOgOH6

CC E'

RECWERY, ETC. • PLEASE 

COVFIR1 THAT THIS IS YOUR MDERSTANnIgO.

CF 6 0787

0 AP ETC

3T.

/

7 7 2 .

AF'SP AP /COT a gE8

. • •

:

:

... I. • •

.....n.1 ' l• . • i

...:4•••:,.. .____LL ..t1 _

.. . ....,...

L

' ... -n, - --.- -; • ..:..f.:'.; • .,:;........ . ,,..:j...., • i .

....- ..*'. ?:..

..

•

=' %), -.

• yr .tt

. :-.11,4•;!.

• ...".*. i..1::.:1:::

• • ..11•4;*

•• ....: i V...

". , • t

.f...,,..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERITRUCK
DISTRIBUTION CORP'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,198
<INVENTORY>                                      2,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,837
<PP&E>                                         143,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,841
<BONDS>                                        211,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,165
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,854)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,288
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                       216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM FOR ONNERAL MC ZEE

SUBJECT: AFSC/AILC Drone Proposal

I have evaluated the AFBC/AFLC proposal to establish

a prOject office under AFBC to handle the development,

testing, procurement and logistic support of the 147/154

drone program. I agree in principle with the concept of

placing those portions of the drone program under normal

Air Force channels. The Drone Program Manager has assured

me that the program can function under the new propped* and

that there could be economies in the program. However,

before further action is taken, I would like to receive additional detailed information prior to making a final dikision.

It is suggested that you have personnel from the

Air Staff, AFIC and AFLC work with.my Drone Program Manager

to develop additional information to illustrate how economies in manpower, facilities and budget are effected compared to the present organizational structure at AMC and

AFLC. It is also important to show how the system responsiveness would be retained.

In the development of this plan you should consider

I: •

*SP 40P4ECRETtbeisefte afgeotime Seammous

IPSO INCA.. se MSS OM &NU

coma — t,01444

• ••••n••••• ND* •• • • .0 •••••

-TOP-SWF- •

-1St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

INASHINOT001, 1).C.

OPPICIF OR The DIRECTOR

. .

1 5 APR E9
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3613 — TECHINT/STELLA/JAMES JONES/INVESTINDUSTRIAL/CLESSIDRA/SIRTI)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 275/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY S.O. BETTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-22, CA-97-65-AM)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S.O. Betts, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Betts, Nos. CR-92-22; CA-97-65-AM (E.D. Va.

Jan. 28, 1997). We find that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.56.1

AMENDMENT TO THE

CASH BALANCE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF

ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC.

The
President of Associated Grocers, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to his authority to adopt amendments under Section 12.1 of the Cash Balance Retirement Plan for Employees of Associated Grocers, Inc. (the Plan), hereby
amends the Plan in the following respects, effective March 28, 2005:

1. The second-to-last paragraph of Section 10.6 of the Plan
is hereby amended to read as follows:

In no event shall payments in a form other than the automatic form described in
Section 5.2 commence prior to the Participants Normal Retirement Age if the Actuarially Equivalent present value of the Participants Accrued Benefit at the time benefits commence exceeds $1,000 without the written consent of the
Participant and the spouse, if any. Spouse consent must acknowledge the effect of such election and must be notarized or witnessed by a Plan representative.

2. Section 10.8(c) is hereby amended to read as follows:



| | (c) | Small Benefits
| | --- | --------------

For Participants
who receive distributions on or after March 28, 2005, and in cases where the Actuarially Equivalent present value of a vested or payable benefit is less than or equal to $1,000, the Retirement Committee shall direct such present value be paid
in a lump sum distribution as soon as practical following Termination and prior to the Annuity Starting Date. Neither Participant nor spousal consent is required for such a distribution.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this amendment to be executed this 22nd day
of December, 2005.



ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC.By

/s/ John S. RunyanIts President




1
#### Nelson, Appellant, vs. Oldenburg, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Leonard F. Schmitt*of Merrill.

For the respondent: *F. J. Smith*of Merrill.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# Certificate of Publication

Ad#529959
In Matter ofPublication of:
Public Notice
State ofCalifornia) ))§ County ofVentura)


## I, Maria Rodriguez, hereby certify that the 

## Ventura County Star Newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura within the provisions of the Government Code ofthe State of California, printed in the City of Camarillo, for circulation in the County of Ventura, State of California; that I am a clerk of the printer of said paper; that the annexed clipping is a true printed copy and publishing in said newspaper onthe following dates to wit: May 12,2015 I, Maria Rodriguez certify under penalty ofperjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this May 12, 2015; in Camarillo, California, County ofVentura.



# . 1)/l/ 

# J/2__
J 

# MariaRodriguez (Signature) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEfORE THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD OF VENTURACOUNTY FOR CONSIDERING THE ADOPTION OF REVISIONS TO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Rule 74.15.1, Boilers, Steam Generators,and Process Heat· ers - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a llUbllc hearing will be held before the Air Pollution con· trol Board of Ventura county to consider adoption of revl· slons to Rule 74.15.1. STAFF IS PROPOSING revisions to

**R~le**74.15.1 to reduceoxides ofmtrogen(NOx) emissionsas an All Feasible Measure under

**th~** California Clean Air Act. Th1s rule revision will impact new or replacement boilers, steam generators, and pro· cess h.

**eater~** with a heat Input capacity ratmg between

### 2 and 5 million BTUs per hour. INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULES including the analysis required by

**~ealth** and Safety Code section 40727.2, is available for review byany interestedparty

**a~** the Air. Pollution Control District off1ces located at 669 Co!!nty Square Drive, Ventura, California, 93003 and on the district

**we~site,** www.vcap· cd.org. Wntten comments may be addressed to Stan Cowen at the District Office (805) 645·1408, and should be received no later than June 1, 2015. AS

**~** RESULT of the public hearmg, the Board (1) may adopt the rule revisions pro- posed by staff, or (2) may not adoptthe rule revisions. SAID PUBLIC HEARING Is to be held before the Air Poilu· tlon Control Board on Tuesday, June 23, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. In the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room, Main Plaza Level of the Administration Building, Ventura County Government Center, 800 south YlctorlaAvenue, Ventura, Cal· lfornla. Any interested party has the prlvileQeto attendand be heard on th1s matter. DATED THIS 12th day of May 2015 • MICHAEL POWERS Clerk of the Board of Super· visors, and ex officio ClerkoftheVentura County Air Pollution control Board C Co

### 1

u 

### 1 fnty of Ventura, State of a ornla By: s/s Rosa Gonzalez Senior Deputy Clerk of the Board 5/12/15 CNS-2749464# VENTURA COUNTY STAR Ad No.529959



### 111111111111 11111111111111111111IIIII/III/IIIII

## II/IIIII/IIIIIIIIIII11111111 

# * A 

## 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 6 4 6 6 6 

# *
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                        STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION
                           OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months         Three Months          Nine Months          Nine Months
                                                        Ended                Ended                Ended                Ended
                                                   Sept. 30, 2004       Sept. 30, 2003       Sept. 30, 2004       Sept. 30, 2003
                                                   --------------       --------------       --------------       --------------
<S>                                                <C>                  <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Net income (loss)                                  $     (596,000)      $      166,000       $   (1,291,000)      $      (37,000)
                                                   ==============       ==============       ==============       ==============

Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic
-------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                              5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311
                                                   ==============       ==============       ==============       ==============


Income (loss) per common share - Basic             $         (.11)      $          .03       $         (.24)      $         (.01)
                                                   ==============       ==============       ==============       ==============

Income (Loss) Per Share - Diluted
---------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                              5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311


Effect of stock options dilution                                0                    0                    0                    0
                                                   --------------       --------------       --------------       --------------

Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings                            5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311            5,470,311
                                                   ==============       ==============       ==============       ==============


Income (loss) per common and common
equivalent share-Diluted                           $         (.11)      $          .03       $         (.24)      $         (.01)
                                                   ==============       ==============       ==============       ==============


</TABLE>