alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MESA AIR GROUP 

410 North 44"" Street 

Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Office (602) 685-4000 

Fax (602) 685-4350 

March 08, 2010 

:~M 

J^0Oq-.o3.X 

M. Clay Mortiz, Jr. 

United States Department of Transportation 

Research and Technology Administration 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OAI, RTS-42 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, East Building, E34 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re.: Confidential Treatment Request for BTS Form 41 for IVIesa Airlines, Inc.; 

BTS Form 298-C, Schedule F-1 for Air Midwest, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, inc. 

(the "Forms") 

Dear Mr. M. Clay Mortiz, Jr., 

Please accept the following request in reference to the above listed Forms. As 

previously communicated to the Department of Transportation (the "Department"), 

Mesa Air Group, Inc's ("Mesa") fiscal year ends on September 30"^. As you know. 

Mesa along with its subsidiaries including the three airlines listed above file 

consolidated financial statements. All three of the airlines listed above have fiscal 

years ending on September SO**^. 

Mesa is currently preparing its financial statements for the quarter ending 

September 30*^ 2009 and expects to file with the SEC and DOT no later than March 

31, 2010. The information contained in the Forms contains non-public information that 

will be included in Mesa's SEC filings. Mesa is providing to the Department unaudited 

financial information in the attached Forms and, if there are any changes, will resubmit 

updated financial information consistent with the final audited financials. 

Accordingly, Mesa requires that the Department keep the information provided in 

the 3'^'' Quarter Forms (July - September 2009) confidential and exclude it from any 

disclosures made pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request or other request 

for information from any non-governmental entity until after Mesa has filed its financial 

statements with the SEC that it expects to file as indicated above. 

If you need any additional information regarding this request, please do not 

hesitate to contact me at (602) 685-4052. 

Sincerely, 

Mesa AinSi^up, Inc.
# C_2005061EN.01000301.xml

| 11.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3709 — Orkla/Elkem)

(2005/C 61/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

N.H., MOTHER OF C.R., A CHILD,

Case No. 5D22-472

Lt. Case No. 2019-DP-106

Appellant, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed July 19, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Hernando County, 

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. 

Ana Gomez-Mallada, Ft. Lauderdale, 

for Appellant. 

Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal 

Services, Department of Children and 

Families, Brooksville, for Appellee. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director 

of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior 

Attorney, of Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, 

for Guardian ad Litem Program. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, WALLIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-20613 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MANUEL IVAN CAVAZOS-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-52-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to repres e n t Manuel Ivan Cavazos-Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cavazos-Aguirre has not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r e levant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. A c c o r d ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20613 Document: 00511640307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-20613

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-20613 Document: 00511640307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES U.S. TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12
<PP&E>                                             510
<DEPRECIATION>                                     133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               12
<BONDS>                                            387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (144)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       389
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       10
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000320446
<NAME> ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           22575
<SECURITIES>                                      3577
<RECEIVABLES>                                    52702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      12984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 92361
<PP&E>                                          650529
<DEPRECIATION>                                  347837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  603368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            94632
<BONDS>                                         136000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9312
<OTHER-SE>                                      293570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    603368
<SALES>                                           9447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                161154
<CGS>                                             9571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   111259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (93)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  45876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     18382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              27494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   2097   
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     25087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .694
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .694
        


</TABLE>
# C_2004262EN.01002801.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/28

---

Action brought on 28 May 2004 by José Félix Merladet against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-198/04)

(2004/C 262/54)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 May 2004 by José Félix Merladet, resident in Overijse (Belgium), represented by N. Lhoëst, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare void the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 June 2001 to 31 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare void the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 June 2001 to 31 December 2003;

| — | annul the express decision of the appointing authority of 12 February 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the express decision of the appointing authority of 12 February 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of his action, the applicant relies on an irregularity in the assessment procedure. During the reference period, the applicant worked in the Commission's Delegations in New Delhi (India) and in Maputo (Mozambique) under various line managers. The applicant submits that the career development review fails to give due weight to the assessments of those managers for whom he worked longer than a month.

The applicant also relies on a manifest error of assessment and failure to state reasons.

---
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                        OF NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

                                                           Three Months        Three Months
                                                           ENDED 3/31/99       ENDED 3/31/98

<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>
Net earnings/(loss)                                        $     87,000        $   (331,000)
                                                           =================    =============


EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - PRIMARY
Weighted average shares  outstanding
    during the period                                         5,468,644           5,457,422
                                                           ================     =============


Earnings/(loss) per common share -
Primary                                                     $       .02        $       (.06)
                                                           ================     =============


EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                                         5,468,644           5,457,422


Common and Common Stock equivalent
shares using the treasury stock method                                0             157,720
                                                            ---------------     --------------


Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings/(loss)                           5,468,644           5,615,142
                                                           ================     =============


Earnings/(Loss) per common and
common Equivalent share - Diluted                          $        .02        $       (.06)
                                                           ================     =============
</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,034-02

EX P ARTE RONALD J. EUBANK S, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W92-67690 IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R This is an application for a writ of habea s corpus. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his convic tion. On May 18, 2016, we filed an d s et the -01 application in this cause to deter mine whether Applicant was entitled to r elief under Article 11.073 of the Code of Criminal Proc edure

. Ex parte Eubanks , No. WR -82 , 0 3 4 -01 (Tex. Crim. App. May 18, 2016) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant has now filed a supplemental g round in the trial court and contends that his g uilty plea was involuntary . We shall treat his supplemental g round as a separ ate a

pplication. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Patterson , 9932

S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. Applicant appea

rs to be repr esente d by counsel. I f he is not and the trial court elec ts to hold a hea ring , it shall determine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appli cant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to r epre sent him a t the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make further finding s of fac t and co n cl u s i o ns of law as to whether Applicant’s g uilty plea was involuntary , as alleg ed in his supplemental g round. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law that it dee ms releva nt and appr opriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. The issues shall be resolved within 30 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff

idavits and interrog atories or the transcr iption of the court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental finding s of fac t a nd conclusions of law, shall be forwa

rded to this Court within 45 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Aug ust 23, 2016 Do not publish
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 21

- 51027 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,** 
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**James Edward Cox,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 346

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** James Edward Cox, federal prisoner # 33500

- 058 , appeals the denial of his motion for compassionate release, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Cox contends that the district court neglected to articulate specific factual reasons reflecting that it had considered all seven

**________________ _____** 

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 26, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-51027 Document: 00516727373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2023No. 21

- 51027

2 of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and that it misapplied those factors that it did consider. We review the district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). The distric t court was not required in its reasons for denial to expressly address each § 3553(a) factor. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Here, the record sufficiently supports the court’s conclusion that the § 3553(a) factors weighed against Cox’s release. See Chavez

- Meza v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018). His disagreement with how the district court balanced the § 3553(a) factors does not merit reversal. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 694. The district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-51027 Document: 00516727373 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2023
----

 EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp. (the "Company " ) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R Gaetz,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 Date: February 7, 2005

/s/ John R Gaetz                                    John R Gaetz   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2105EM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Kenneth Waller, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: December 15, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Waller appeals his drug-related convictions. Waller contends the

district court improperly instructed the jury on constructive possession. Waller also

contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We conclude that

an extended discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no useful

purpose. We have carefully considered Waller's contentions and find them to be

without merit. We thus affirm Waller's convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0461 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MELISSA ANN TRAINER, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

111 J 

MAY 0 3 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State clf NInntana 

ORDER 

On September 13, 2021, Defendant and Appellant Melissa Ann Trainer filed a 

Notice of Appeal in this Court, appealing from the May 24, 2021 Order Granting State's 

Appeal issued by the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, in its Cause 

No. DV 20-0128. Plaintiff and Appellee State of Montana has moved to disrniss Trainer's 

appeal pursuant to M. R. App. P. 6(2) and § 46-20-104(1), MCA. The State asserts that 

Trainer is attempting to appeal frorn an order which is neither a final judgment of 

conviction nor an order after a final judgment of conviction that affects Trainer's 

substantial rights, and as such this is not an appealable order under the applicable statute 

and appellate rule. 

Trainer, via counsel, opposes the State's rnotion to dismiss. While she admits that 

the order she seeks to appeal is not a final judgment of conviction, she asserts that the order 

is appealable because § 46-20-104, MCA "allows a defendant to also appeal orders after 

judgment which affect substantial rights of the defendant." In this case, the Order at issue 

is not an order after judgment, as no judgrnent has yet been entered in this case. Therefore, 

it is not appealable under § 46-20-104, MCA. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that that the motion to dismiss this appeal is 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

05/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0461
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record. 

Dated this 3 day of May, 2022. 

hief Justice 7A r)

2