alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005132EN.01003102.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/31

---

Action brought on 14 March 2005 by Dominique Albert-Bousquet and 142 Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-130/05)

(2005/C 132/57)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 14 March 2005 by Dominique Albert-Bousquet, residing in Brussels, and 142 other officials, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions to appoint the applicants officials of the European Communities, in so far as those decisions determine their grade of recruitment in accordance with Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions to appoint the applicants officials of the European Communities, in so far as those decisions determine their grade of recruitment in accordance with Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants in this case, who were all recruited after 1 May 2004 as successful candidates in competitions for which notices had been published before that date, object to the alleged discrimination arising from the fact that their conditions of classification, in accordance with Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials, are different from those of the successful candidates in the same competitions who were recruited before that amendment of the Staff Regulations.

In support of their claims, the applicants plead:

| — | breach of the principle of equal treatment, |
| --- | --- |

—

breach of the principle of equal treatment,

| — | infringement of Articles 31(1) and 29(1) of the Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Articles 31(1) and 29(1) of the Staff Regulations,

| — | infringement of Article 5(5) of the Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 5(5) of the Staff Regulations,

| — | breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

—

breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

The applicants submit in that regard that it is apparent from Community case-law that the successful candidates in a competition are in a comparable situation and must therefore be accorded the same treatment. In addition, they submitted their applications with a view to being recruited to fill one of the vacant posts referred to in the respective notices of the competitions which they passed. They were therefore entitled to foster reasonable expectations of being recruited to the posts and at the grades specified in the notices of the competitions which they passed.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         181,196
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  737,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    296,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,375,143
<PP&E>                                         664,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,041,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,493,459
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       4,910
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (489,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,041,714
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,078,084
<CGS>                                          1,203,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,676,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,755,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,755,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,755,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
SIXTH AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE

                           UNITED MERIDIAN CORPORATION
                  1994 EMPLOYEE NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN

                  WHEREAS,  there is reserved to the Board of  Directors  of the
Company  in  Section  7  of  the  United  Meridian   Corporation  1994  Employee
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") the right to amend the Plan;

                  NOW, THEREFORE,  as of the effective date of the Ocean Energy,
Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       Section 2 is amended to read as follows:

                  "Notwithstanding  anything  in the  Plan to the  contrary,  no
                  options or other  awards  may be granted  under the Plan on or
                  after the effective date of this Sixth Amendment."

                  Except as  amended  by this  Sixth  Amendment,  the Plan shall
                  continue without interruption or change.

                  Dated: March 27, 1998
***Exhibit 99.2***

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Channell Commercial Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Liguori, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

|          (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |                                                                                                                                                |
|          (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/ THOMAS LIGUORI          |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
| **Thomas Liguori**          |   |
| **Chief Financial Officer** |   |
| **March 25, 2003**          |   |
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Vegetative Treatment Area (Code 635) 

An area of permanent vegetation used for agricultural

wastewater treatment. 

Practice Information 

Vegetated treatment areas are used to improve water

quality by reducing loading of nutrients, organics,

pathogens, and other contaminants associated with animal

manure and other wastes and wastewater by treating

agricultural wastewater and runoff from livestock holding

areas. More than one treatment strip may be needed. For the wastewater treatment strip to work

properly, discharge to and through it must be in the form of sheet flow so that the discharge does not

concentrate into channels. Some means, such as a ditch, curb, or gated pipe, is provided to disperse

concentrated flow and ensure sheet flow across the width of the treatment strip. Permanent

herbaceous vegetation, consisting of a single species or a mixture of grasses, legumes, and/or other

forbs adapted to the soil and climate, is established in the treatment strip. The vegetated treatment

area must receive regular maintenance for it to operate as planned. 

Common Associated Practices 

Vegetated Treatment Area (635) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as Waste

Storage Facility (313), Waste Utilization (633), Heavy Use Area Protection (561), Critical Area Planting

(342), Nutrient Management (590), and Solid/Liquid Separation Facility (632). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 2, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Frank M. Jerneycic
Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
February 17, 2004
*May*8, *1928.*

#### Moravcik, by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Fischer, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county dated February 28, 1927: Edgar V. Wer-ner, Judge.

Assault. Verdict and judgment for , defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant: *Brennan, Lucas & McDonough*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Bottum, Hudnall, Lecher, McNamara & Michael*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005106EN.01001002.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/10

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 28 October 2004

in Case C-236/03 P Commission of the European Communities v CMA CGM and Others (1)

1

(Appeal - Cartels - Maritime transport between northern Europe and the Far East - Fines - Limitation period - Appeal partly clearly inadmissible and partly clearly unfounded)

(2005/C 106/19)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-236/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged at the Court on 2 June 2003 by the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: P. Oliver), the other parties to the proceedings being CMA CGM, established in Marseilles (France), Evergreen Marine Corp. Ltd, established in Taipei, (Taiwan), Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, established in Taipei, Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH, established in Seoul (South Korea), Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, established in Tokyo (Japan), Malaysia International Shipping Corporation Berhad, established in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd, established in Tokyo, Neptune Orient Lines Ltd, established in Singapore, Nippon Yusen Kaisha, established in Tokyo, Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd, established in Wanchai (China), P & O Nedlloyd Container Liner Ltd, established in London, Yangming Marine Transport Corp., established in Taipei, (lawyers: J. Pheasant and M. Levitt), Senator Lines GmbH, formerly DSR-Senator Lines GmbH, established in Bremen (Germany), (lawyers: J. Pheasant and M. Levitt, and D. Waelbroeck and U. Zinsmeister), and Cho Yang Shipping Co. Ltd, established in Seoul, in liquidation — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 28 October 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 02.08.2003.

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 1

1 Congress Street, Suite 1100

BOSTON, MA 02114

- 2023

Memorandum

Date: January 25 , 2012

Subject: Dentists Who Certify They Neither Place Nor Remove Amalgam

To: Damon Highsmith

EPA HQ

- OST

From: Justin Pimpare, Regional Pretreatment Coordinator

Municipal Assistance Unit

The purpose of t his memo is to provide you with data from specific New England

States related to d ental facilities being exempt from approved State Legislation on

the basis that the dentist neither installs nor removes amalgam at the specific

facility.

The following contains the number of dentists is each State that has certified that

they neither place nor remove ama lgam within their practice, and therefore, are

exempt from the State regulation. In order to calculate a percent age those number

of dentists were divided by the total number of dentists within the State.

Maine

118/630= 19%

Massachusetts

601/2973=20%

N ew Hampshire

164/1074=15%

Vermont

55/275=20%

Of these four Stat es there are a total of 938/4952 or 19% that have certified that

they neither place nor remov e amalgam within their practice and therefore, exempt

from the State requirements.This data has been confirmed by each State Pretreatment Coordinator.

If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me at 617 918 1531.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 11, 2002


                                        /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Floyd Warkol
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      1,842
<SECURITIES>                                    0   
<RECEIVABLES>                              10,589     
<ALLOWANCES>                                  170     
<INVENTORY>                                     0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           18,932     
<PP&E>                                      1,684     
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,142     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,569     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,402     
<BONDS>                                         0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0     
<PREFERRED>                                     0     
<COMMON>                                       54     
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,035     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               23,569     
<SALES>                                         0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            9,748     
<CGS>                                       9,244     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              10,387     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (651)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (320)    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (331)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0     
<CHANGES>                                       0     
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.06)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.06)    
        

</TABLE>
MES AAI R GROU P 41 0 Nort h 44" " Stree t Suit e 70 0 Phoenix , A Z 8500 8 Offic e (602 ) 685-400 0 Fax(602 ) 685-435 0 Marc h 08 , 201 0 :~ M 

# J^0Oq-.o3. X

M . Cla yMortiz , Jr . Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n Researc h an d Technolog yAdministratio n Burea u o fTransportatio n Statistics , OAI , RTS-4 2 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , SE , Eas tBuilding , E3 4 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Re. : Confidentia l Treatmen tReques tfo rBT S For m 4 1 fo rIVIes a Airlines , Inc. ; BT S For m 298-C , Schedul e F- 1 fo rAi rMidwest , Inc . an d Freedo m Airlines , inc . (th e "Forms" ) Dea rMr . M . Cla yMortiz , Jr. , Pleas e accep tth e followin g reques ti n referenc e t o th e abov e liste d Forms . A s previousl ycommunicate d t o th e Departmen to fTransportatio n (th e "Department") , Mes a Ai rGroup , Inc' s ("Mesa" ) fisca l yea rend s o n Septembe r30"^ . A s yo u know . Mes a alon g wit h it s subsidiarie s includin g th e thre e airline s liste d abov e fil e consolidate d financia l statements . Al l thre e o fth e airline s liste d abov e hav e fisca l year s endin g o n Septembe rSO**^ . Mes a i s currentl ypreparin g it s financia l statement s fo rth e quarte rendin g Septembe r30*^

200 9 an d expect s t o fil e wit h th e SE C an d DO Tn o late rtha n Marc h 31 , 2010 . Th e informatio n containe d i n th e Form s contain s non-publi cinformatio n tha t wil l b e include d i n Mesa' s SE C filings . Mes a i s providin g t o th e Departmentunaudite d financia l informatio n i n th e attache d Form s and , i fther e ar e an ychanges , wil l resubmi t update d financia l informatio n consisten twit h th e fina l audite d financials . Accordingly , Mes a require s tha tth e Departmentkee p th e informatio n provide d i n th e 3'^'' Quarte rForm s (Jul y- Septembe r2009 ) confidentia l an d exclud e i tfro m an y disclosure s mad e pursuan tt o a Freedo m o fInformatio n Ac treques to rothe rreques t fo rinformatio n fro m an ynon-governmenta l entit yunti l afte rMes a ha s file d it s financia l statement s wit h th e SE C tha ti texpect s t o fil e a s indicate d above . I fyo u nee d an yadditiona l informatio n regardin g thi s request , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac tm e a t(602 ) 685-4052 . Sincerely , Mes a AinSi^up , Inc .
'. ·1.ln·JI_ .. JI·~~,.;;;);.'f··:. 

TtiP S[e~fT f\ CMt.OL ,nUN.- . 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

·f'tJo· . J A ~ "" BVU;Atf . ' 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART ....... NATIONAL RECON~AISSANCE OFFICE 

DECLASSIFIED ON:.1 OCTOBER 2012 ' WASHINGTON. D.C. ' 

........ ,. .. ,ur THE DIReCTOR 

16 April 1973 

; 'MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, CIA RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAMS 

-

• 

-

-

-, 

-, 

" 

SUBJECT: Outstanding Contribution of HEXAGON" 

On, July 1, management of the HEXAGON se~sor program 

will be transferred from CIA to ·the ·Air Force.' t· want to 

take this occasion to recognize·the leadership, foresight: 

and dedication to the preservation of the National. security- . 

'displayed by you and' your office in the design',. <ievelopment 

and, initial operation of this' extremely Unportan~ photo-, . 

'reconn'aissance satellite. ' 

Before the first flight, there we.re many who' felt that 

HEXAGON 'was to,o c~mplex .an . undertaking' to be succ.essful~ 

The nearly ·£lawleE?s 'OperRtion of·'·thefir.st flight vehicle 

dispelled these doubt:'s and again confirmed the, excellence 

'ofthe work' Cbne undel:' your leadership. Each' subsequent 

. flight· of HEXAGONhasoutperfo~ed its pred~~essQr. 

Because public recognition of this major contribution'· ' 

.is .·~ot possible' and becau'se s'omany unsung .individua.ls " 

have worked 8.0 diligently, to· make HEXAGON· successful, I. . 

WQuld appreciate your. e~tending ~y si~cere compliments 

~np those of the Secretary of Defense' to your people as: 

we recog~ize an outstanding,e~ample of' "a'job ·well .done." 

HEXAGO~i 

. . WARNlHG NOTICE . '1- . C~ASSIFIE~ BY ~VfM"N - 1 !Xr:M~r fROM . , t \ ~, nr .... ~· Gc.Nt:~AL DfCll\.j~lfICATION SC"HEDUlE' Of , , s(t,sn Ht Ir, TElIJu .. ,h ... SOURCES ,f:([CUTIVE CROfR 116j2 EXEMI'TION ' . 

K~"OLI VIA 

BYEr:~1Ar~ COH~IIOL~Y~n,. 

. . Mill p:u:nmps mVOLVED' ~ C;;':>P.Y 51'2 or:!.As:;:ry ON ~Ml' '. C~T~e.. . BYE 12732-73 • . . t ... ·t:f' SFSn-r-- .• . C~H'''OI. "0 _____ _ " . fa: nt i . .cOPV . 1 Q,_2. __ Co1tIU 

~'CLUD"iJ 'Jr(lM "~no\'rII: II£C;M""IH!I. "/f!.J I -Lt,,' ..... GE 1 'OF_~.PAGtS' DOD "lltrC"~'l uon.ID D'OU NOt· ... r"'v --,.. ~r ..