### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

883 MWGen W aukegan 8Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 883 MWGen W aukegan 8

1 7/13/2010 8:00 2 7/14/2010 7:00 3 7/15/2010 7:40 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

7/13/2010 10:00 0.38 Dry 7/14/2010 9:00 0.36 Dry 7/15/2010 9:40 0.41 Dry Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results

Test End Time Test End DatePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 3.69E-07 2311.39 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 3.47E-07 2350 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 3.91E-07 2299.52 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

4103.5 12.1 13.07 6.48 807877 338 288320 4205.1 12.6 13.23 6.23 780068 340.5 287920 4071.9 12.9 13.43 5.97 798069 348.8 287980 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method
subbituminous lb/hour Other subbituminous lb/hour Other subbituminous lb/hour Other

Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input 61276 62 0.6 62.6 0 Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input 61283 59 0.4 59.4 0 Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input 61289 62 1.1 63.1 0 Other Supporting InformationTotal NonSpike (ng) Sample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit
62.6 0.162252 0.967741935 59.4 0.158849 0.677966102 63.1 0.157987 1.774193548 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Trap #1

≤ 20% of field

recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of SectionConcentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume
0.385819589 75069 109 0.4 109.4 50 59.4 0.159116 0.373940031 75060 104 0.3 104.3 50 54.3 0.157212 0.399399951 75085 115 0.4 115.4 50 65.4 0.155622 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff.

0.366972477 0.373312552 0.012507 0.288461538 0.345393481 0.028547 0.347826087 0.420249065 0.020849 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤ 20% of field recovery test Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD)RD (%) Limit C rec R (%) by Run Ravg(%) Limit

1.647544 50 96.02 3.968472 50 91.02 2.543664 50 106.49 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≥ 10 % RD mass

for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

97.84333333 Paired Trap Agreement (RD)EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

883 MWGen W aukegan 8

1 7/13/2010 14:05 7/13/2010 2 7/14/2010 13:30 7/14/2010 3 7/15/2010 13:50 7/15/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)
15:20 [<0.17] Dry 14:38 [<0.16] Dry 15:01 [<0.17] Dry Test End TimeTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDL Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results[<0.000187] 2359.51 4236.8 12.8 13 6.6 790298

[<0.000173] 2365.64 4260.5 15 13.5 5.9 798284 [<0.000180] 2307.98 4170.9 16 13.4 6.2 771261 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 340.5 290570 subbituminous lb/hour Other 347.8 288100 subbituminous lb/hour Other 352.9 296620 subbituminous lb/hour Other Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input

Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input Fuel from coal HHV and CEMS heat input Other Supporting Information