alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HANOVER
DIRECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN IT ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                           2,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,042)
<INVENTORY>                                     66,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,048
<PP&E>                                          84,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,786)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,457
<BONDS>                                         45,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,986
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       136,324
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,329
<SALES>                                        124,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,535
<CGS>                                           78,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005116EN.01000201.xml

| 18.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 May 2005

(2005/C 116/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2616 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6869 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,224 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5445 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1136 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5773 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,155 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,7 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2237 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 156 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,15 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7469 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6698 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6016 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8394 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7857 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0947 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 273,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0468 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4416 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,31 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 953,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,794 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,776 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,337 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,312 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2616

JPY

Japanese yen

135,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6869

SEK

Swedish krona

9,224

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5445

ISK

Iceland króna

84,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1136

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5773

CZK

Czech koruna

30,155

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,7

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2237

ROL

Romanian leu

36 156

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,15

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7469

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6698

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6016

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8394

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7857

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0947

KRW

South Korean won

1 273,21

ZAR

South African rand

8,0468

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4416

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,31

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 953,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,794

PHP

Philippine peso

68,776

RUB

Russian rouble

35,337

THB

Thai baht

50,312

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005115EN.01003002.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/30

---

Action brought on 22 February 2005 by Suzy Frederic-Leemans against the European Economic and Social Committee

(Case T-108/05)

(2005/C 115/55)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Economic and Social Committee was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 February 2005 by Suzy Frederic-Leemans, residing in Lahas (France), represented by G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and A. Finchelstein, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the applicant's May 2004 pension statement, so as to apply a correction coefficient at the level of the capital of her country of residence or, at least, a correction coefficient which appropriately reflects the differences in the costs of living in the place where the applicant is deemed to incur her expenditure and therefore complying with the principle of equivalence; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the applicant's May 2004 pension statement, so as to apply a correction coefficient at the level of the capital of her country of residence or, at least, a correction coefficient which appropriately reflects the differences in the costs of living in the place where the applicant is deemed to incur her expenditure and therefore complying with the principle of equivalence;

| 2. | order the European Economic and Social Committee to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the European Economic and Social Committee to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and arguments relied upon in this case are similar to those invoked in Case T-35/05 Elisabeth Agne-Dapper and Others v Commission.

Elisabeth Agne-Dapper and Others

Commission

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BioScrip, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hai Tran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 9, 2015








/s/ Hai Tran


Hai Tran,


Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer


and Principal Financial Officer
-

Approved for Release: 2017 /01 /25 C05096188 

\H .. 11.fr&t.r 

lf 

.A' .January 1966 

SUBJl:CT: SOC Reorganization 

1 .. At: a .January 4 meeting between Mr. Reber, myself, 

Mr .I .nd Col Howard, the following .. organizational 

arrangceiit/perammel aaud.gnment• were agreed to for the soc 

(SS-4): 

a. The SIGD1T aection will continue unchanged 

(Kr. W~llia» Cmdr Ld.oque. Capt Greene); 

b. The Weather aectlon will continue unchanged 

(L/Col Hughes, Capt Forsyth, C&pt VanLeuvan); 

c. The B.aquirementa section will be eliminated and 

its personnel reat1signed to a Photo Operations Team and the 

Command Poat section; 

d. A Spotting Photographic Satellite Operations 

Tea;n will , ea tab lubed (Major Schadegg, Chief, Capt Finkle, 

Hr. L _IPl.wiJ Major Voiles when ba reports for duty); 

e. · A Search/Surveillance Satellite Operation& Twill be established (Lt Col r•rbell .. ~ef, effective upon 

departure of Maj Burger, Mr._ _ /Cmdr licharda); 

f. The Command Poat, headed up by CMS Hanaen, will 

be augmented by the addition of Sgta Hax.-r and luonazmi, and 

AlC Reemta. Although Sgt a Marr and Buorumnl may retain their 

Intelligence Specialiat claaaificationa, they actually will 

work u Operations Speeialiat11; if they do not d••ir• to work 

out of their career fields, they will be transferred to DIA or 

A1'NIN and replaced by operatiou peraonnel. If AlC Beemta 18 

not trainable into an operatima apecialty, he will be trauferred and replaced by a peraou of more auitable background .. 

.i...(L,.._,~ .. -J--,~ --· 

• • - •.. ~ It 

Approved for Release: 2017 /01 /25 C05096188 

50X1 
I'd" tli 11 ·- ~' 

Approved for Release: ___ 2017 /01 /25 C05096188 ,,_titliliS"llf 

g. Mr.c=]vill be duip.ated A•d.niatrative 

Aaalmtant to the Chief, SOC. As an addition.al duty, he will · 

be the .bsietant &ucutive Officer. He will be aaiatad by 

AlC Centimo:le and A2C Farrell who will rotate between the 

dutiu of l.eceptioniat and Aaabtant to Mr. at approxi• 

mately two-week interval.a. 

I 

2. Possible further chan.ge.s, mostly concerniDg a Deputy 

and/ or a Chief of an overall Photographic Divialon 'Were held 

in abeyance. 

cc: Mr. Reber 

ft.&;... w-~':'."' ,,,.' ·, 

Col rt 

James t. Stewart 

Brigadier General 1 USAF 

Director, llDitO Staff 

l. SS-1 

2. Mr. Beber .. I 

3. Mr.I SS-4 

50X1 

4. colwortliiUm,ss-5 

2 

5. RF-1 

6. R.F-2 

>~·:-----J .. ' ~ 

~ -.;,-: ____ 2-:_. =i~=- - C:-"t~·.jl ;~'.:.~JJr_c.__£ 

L I . 

Approved for Release: 2017 /01 /25 C05096188·-------------
# C_2005082EN.01002801.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/28

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 26 January 2005

in Case T-193/02: Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) Players' agents regulation - Decision of an association of undertakings - Articles 49 EC, 81 EC and 82 EC - Complaint - Lack of Community interest - Rejection)

(2005/C 82/54)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-193/02: Laurent Piau, residing in Nantes (France), represented by M. Fauconnet, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: O. Beynet and A. Bouquet with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA), established in Zurich (Switzerland), represented by F. Louis and A. Vallery, lawyers — application for annulment of the Commission decision of 15 April 2002 rejecting the applicant's complaint concerning the Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) Players' agents regulation — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 26 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Fédération internationale de football association to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Fédération internationale de football association to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 219 of 14.09.2002.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report Creative  Eateries  Corp(the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Frank  J.
Holdraker,  the President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: May 10, 2006                         /s/ Frank J. Holdraker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Frank J. Holdraker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERITRUCK
DISTRIBUTION CORP'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,318
<INVENTORY>                                      2,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,027
<PP&E>                                         163,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,223
<BONDS>                                        229,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,955
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,057)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,237)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (243)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      10.22**





**Terms
      of Director Cash Compensation**








CN
      Bancorp Inc. does not currently pay any fees to its directors.





County
      National Bank does not currently pay any fees to inside directors. An inside
      director is a director who is also an employee of the bank. At the present
      time
      there are two inside directors, Jan W. Clark and John G. Warner.





Outside
      directors of County National Bank are paid $600 per month for meetings attended.
      Outside directors who are members of the executive committee of the board of
      directors receive an additional $300 per month. Outside directors who are
      members of the loan committee and perform appraisal review services receive
      an
      additional $250 per month regardless of the number of reviews performed. Outside
      directors receive $75 for any other committee meeting attended.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests

# Recent FOIA Requests for 2015

The following pages present chronological listings of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Requests submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during each month of the current fiscal year. These listings include the subject and reference number of each request. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 10, 2021
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Fin & Feather Club, by and through 

Trustee, Kenneth Parten, Appellant

No. 06-13-00006-CV v.

Dale Leander and Don Leander, Appellees

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 37293). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Fin & Feather Club, by and through Trustee, Kenneth 

Parten, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 16, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Maxwell *v.*Holland.

*Mr. McLain*had been Counsel for the Defendant, and after hr- d»-a<h, no other rounscl had been employed, and the Defendant had removed to some pan of rhe world, the. Plaintiff knew not where' — the Plaintiff wished to take the deposition of a man * ho lived in New England, and prayed the court to direct to whom, and in what manner notice, of taking it should be given, there’ being neither party nor counsel upon whom it could be served.

*Per curiam*

Let notice he given in the Fayetteville Gazette three weeks successively, that the deposition will be taken a! a certain place and day, at the distance of three months after the publication. The Plaintiff should not l<>se his testimony, because the other party hath removed himself, ami failed to appoint an attorney upon whom notice might be served.
#### Thomas Powell and others v. The Executor of Sterling Powell, dec’d.

HVo,n ftobeson-

V'vise. One by Ills will, after giving several small legacies, directed his executors to sell the remainder of liis estate both real and personal, *not before disposed of,*and after paying his debts, to dispose of ijie proceeds as they mig-lit think proper; Held, that this clause absolved the executors from responsibility to any one, as to every part of the personal estate, which had not by operation of the will come Into their hands subject to á trust,

Vhere a testator gives to his executors (as in this esse he does) all the rest of his estate *not before disposed of*he leaves nothing which the next of bin can claim, for their claim is founded oh a partial *tu~ testai;!/.*

*327This was a bill filed for distribution of the slaves of Sterling Powell, deceased. He by his will gave several small legacies, and then directed his executors to sell the remainder of his estate, both real and personal, *not before disposed of,*and after paying the debts; to dispose of the proceeds as they might think proper. The negroes were included in the residuary clause, ami it was submitted to this Court to decide, whether, as the testator bad not given the negroes to his executors *directly,*but simply authorised them to sell and dispose of the proceeds, the next of kin were not entitled.

Seawexi, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The residuary clause of the will, by authorising the executors to dispose of the surplus of tiie estate as they might think proper, absolved the executors, who are the legal owners of the personal estate, from accountability to *any*one *;*and this want of accountability goes to every part of the personal estate, which had not, by the operation of the will, come into the hands of the executors, subject to a trust.

When the legatee dies in the life-time of the testator, and the legacy becomes lapsed ; or when the devise is void, and on that account cannot take effect, they shall pass into the residuum of the estate and the testator having given to the executors, all the rest of his, estate *nob before disposed*of, leaves nothing which the next of kin can claim ,• for their claim is founded upon a partial intestacy. Let the bill be dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

February 10, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs:

We are aware that MICROS Systems, Inc. has incorporated by reference our report
dated February 10, 1997 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 71) in the Prospectus constituting part of its
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-17725, No. 333-05125, No.
33-69782, No. 33-44481 and No. 33-33535).  We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP





                                       22