alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004217EN.01002102.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/21

---

Action brought on 25 May 2004 by Tokai Europe GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-183/04)

(2004/C 217/39)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 May 2004 by Tokai Europe GmbH, Mönchengladbach (Germany), represented by G. Kroemer, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 of 1 March 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 of 1 March 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature; (1)

1

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant manufactures cigarette lighters and imports cigarette lighters and parts for cigarette lighters. It contests Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004.

The applicant submits that, by classifying, in the contested regulation, the base metal wheels imported for the manufacture of cigarette lighters in Mexico and Hong Kong as parts (of cigarette lighters) under subheading 961390 of the customs nomenclature, the Commission extended the scope of that subheading beyond its wording. As a result, primary products also used in other goods which cannot be classed under heading 9613 were classified as parts for cigarette lighters. The Commission thereby exceeded the limits of its discretion.

The applicant also claims that, in taking account of the intended use of the metal wheels in the manufacture of cigarette lighters, the Commission acted in breach of the principle that goods are to be classified according to their objective nature. In the reasons stated in the regulation, express reference is made to the wheels' intended use.

Moreover, the applicant submits that, when classifying the metal wheels, the Commission failed to comply with the explanatory notes on the Harmonised System (HS) issued by the Customs Cooperation Council in that, as is stated in the reasons, it based the classification of the wheels in the customs tariff on the criterion of intended use rather than applying the criterion of appearance.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 64, p. 21.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      31,374,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,260,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,245,245
<PP&E>                                      10,294,567
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,570,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,173,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,489,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 14,793,409
<COMMON>                                        12,235
<OTHER-SE>                                (23,878,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,173,827
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,141,630
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,107,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,315,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,673,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,673,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,673,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
# Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard and supporting documents for Cover Crop (Ac.) (340).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) (9/14) Standard Document(44.28 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) Overview(550.88 KB)

Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) CPPE(26.06 KB)

Cover Crop (Ac.) (340) Network Diagram(85.8 KB)

Termination Guidelines Designed v4_2019 updated(742.08 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Cover Crops

This video explores how Charlie Roberts in Halls, TN, is using this practice to protect soil health and increase water infiltration on his cropland.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2005082EN.01001002.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg by order of that court of 5 January 2005 in Elfering Export GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-27/05)

(2005/C 82/22)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Finance Court, Hamburg) (Germany) of 5 January 2005, received at the Court Registry on 27 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Elfering Export GmbH and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas on the following question:

Is the declaration made in an export declaration that the product in respect of which a refund is sought is of Community origin information to which a penalty may attach under Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 (1) in conjunction with Article 5(4) thereof?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 102, p. 11.

1

---
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-63918, Form S-3 No. 333-40451, Form S-8 dated October 9, 1997,
Form S-3 No. 333-78061, Form S-8 No. 333-82513, Form S-8 No. 333-44326 and Form
S-3 No. 333-49418) of Arden Realty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated January 30, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Arden Realty, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 29, 2002
# Oregon Employee Directory

1201 NE Lloyd BlvdSuite 900PortlandOR97232

503-414-3200

ORInfo@usda.gov

1201 NE Lloyd BlvdSuite 900PortlandOR97232-1274

Oregon

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Oregon 
-  Oregon Employee Directory 

Contact NRCS Oregon's employees in the state office and in the field.

##   NRCS Oregon Staff Directory

View a full list of NRCS Oregon staff linked below. 

NRCS Oregon Staff Directory - Feb 2024(2.08 MB)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Channell CommercialCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

•                  The Annual Report of the Company on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  The information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Date:  March 18,2005

 

 
|   | /s/ William H.  Channell, Jr. |                                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                         | William H. Channell, Jr.                                  |
|   | Title:                        | President and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|   |                          |                                                      |
|   |                          |                                                      |
|   | /s/ Scott Kiefer              |                                                      |
|   | Name:                         | Scott Kiefer                                              |
|   | Title:                        | Corporate Controller and Interim Chief  Financial Officer |
|        |                               |                                                           |  |  |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1976

___________________________

Bobby F. McReynolds

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Preston Glenn, Jail Administrator, Nevada County Jail; Christopher Wattingny,

Doctor, Wadley Medical Center; Wadley Regional Medical Center at Hope; Dr.

Elkins, Nevada County Jail; Sheriff Danny Martin, Nevada County Jail

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana

____________

Submitted: February 19, 2019

Filed: February 25, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas inmate Bobby F. McReynolds

appeals orders of the district court

1

dismissing the claims against some defendants,

and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants. Construing the record

in a light most favorable to McReynolds, and drawing all reasonable inferencesin his

favor, we agree with the district court’s reasons for finding that summary judgment

was warranted on the claims against defendants Preston Glenn, Dr. Elkins, and

Sheriff Danny Martin. See Laganiere v. Cty. of Olmsted, 772 F.3d 1114, 1116 (8th

Cir. 2014) (de novo review). As to the remaining defendants, we agree that Wadley

Medical Center was not a state actor, see Gentry v. City of Lee’s Summit, Mo., 10 F.3d

1340, 1342 (8th Cir. 1993) (recognizing that one of the two essential elements of a

§ 1983 action is showing that complained-of-conduct was committed by a person

acting under color of state law, i.e. a person who was acting on behalf of the state

with authority provided by the state); and we conclude that the court was required to

dismiss Dr. Christopher Wattingny for failure to serve after giving McReynolds

several extensionsto provide an accurate address forservice, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)

(holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the

court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the

action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a

certain time). We find no merit to McReynolds’s challenges to other orders, and we

decline to consider the new matters he raises, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-

15 (8th Cir. 2014) (explaining in pro se appeal that new allegations and claims will

not be considered). The judgment is affirmed, see 8thCir. R. 47B; and McReynolds’s

appellate motions are denied. 

______________________________

1The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States DistrictJudge for the Western

District of Arkansas, in part adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District

of Arkansas. 

-2-
EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 13, 2003

                                       /s/ Richard W.Lucas
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Richard W. Lucas
                                       Chief Financial Officer



           A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
           has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
           and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
           upon request.







                                       22
Order entered December 20, 2012 

In The 

Court of appeato 

jfiftb 31.55tritt of TEexao at fit aftaizi 

No. 05-11-01527-CV 

DMC VALLEY RANCH, LLC, DMC FRISCO, L.L.C, ET AL, Appellant 

V. 

HPSC, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-07-14983 

ORDER 

On the Court's own motion, this case is REMOVED from submission on February 13, 

2013 at 1:00 p.m. The case will be reset in due course. 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999, AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001004317
<NAME> IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          26,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,496)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,650
<PP&E>                                         445,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,260,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,484
<BONDS>                                        585,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                     486,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,260,097
<SALES>                                        241,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,136
<CGS>                                          120,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,643)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (9,159)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)


</TABLE>
# C_2005093EN.01001002.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/10

---

Action brought on 7 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against Ireland

(Case C-46/05)

(2005/C 93/19)

Language of procedure: English

An action against Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 7 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Nicola Yerrell, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission requests the Court

| a) | to find that Ireland has failed its obligations under the EC Treaty by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27th November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) (1) or by failing to ensure that management and labour have introduced the necessary measures by agreement, and/or by failing to inform the Commission thereof;
  and |
| --- | --- |

a)

to find that Ireland has failed its obligations under the EC Treaty by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27th November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) (1) or by failing to ensure that management and labour have introduced the necessary measures by agreement, and/or by failing to inform the Commission thereof;

th

1

and

| b) | to condemn Ireland to bear the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

b)

to condemn Ireland to bear the costs of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 1 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 302, 01.12.2000, p. 57

1

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1143 

To make the authority of States of Washington, Oregon, and California 

to manage Dungeness crab fishery permanent and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To make the authority of States of Washington, Oregon, 

and California to manage Dungeness crab fishery permanent and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Dungeness 

5 Crab Management Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY MANAGEMENT. 

7 Section 203 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to approve 

8 a governing international agreement between the United 

9 States and the Republic of Poland, and for other purVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:02 May 08, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1143.IS S1143

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1143 IS

1 poses’’, approved November 13, 1998 (Public Law 105– 

2 384; 16 U.S.C. 1856 note) is amended— 

3 (1) by striking subsection (i); and 

4 (2) by redesignating subsection (j) as sub5 section (i). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors of
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on the Effectiveness of the Internal Control Structure
Relative to the Servicing of Home Loan Receivables, that Chevy Chase Bank,
F.S.B. (the "Bank") maintained an effective internal control structure over
financial reporting relative to the servicing of home loan receivables
owned by Chevy Chase Home Loan Trust Series 1996-1 and 1997-1
(collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 2000.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure over
financial reporting, testing, and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of the internal control structure, and such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors
or irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control structure over financial reporting to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control structure
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained an
effective internal control structure over financial reporting relative to
the servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Bank's home loan Trusts
as of September 30, 1999, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
upon criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of
directors and management of the Bank, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., U.S.
Bank National Association and MBIA Insurance Corporation, and should not
be used for any other purpose.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Vienna, VA
October 25, 2000