alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004300EN.01001202.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-340/02: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/50/EEC - Procedure for the award of public service contracts - Assistance to the maître d'ouvrage for a sewage treatment plant - Award to the successful candidate in an earlier design contest without prior publication of a contract notice in the OJEC)

(2004/C 300/24)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-340/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 24 September 2002, between Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Nolin) and French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues, S. Pailler and D. Petrausch) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by virtue of the award by the Communauté urbaine du Mans of a study contract for assistance to the maître d'ouvrage in respect of the Chauvinière sewage treatment plant, without publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Communities, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, and in particular Article 15(2) thereof; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by virtue of the award by the Communauté urbaine du Mans of a study contract for assistance to the maître d'ouvrage in respect of the Chauvinière sewage treatment plant, without publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Communities, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, and in particular Article 15(2) thereof;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)   OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115158 

BYE-5434-~9 

Copy Soi-L 

MEMORANDUM FOit: Col. Frank ,y. Hartley. Program "DII 

Chairman. hnagf:l'Y Exploitation Subcommittee. COMIREX 

SUBJECT 

REFERENCE 

Chairman. Sanitization and Decontrol 

Working Group" COMlREX 

TALENT Control Ciiicel'. CIA 

Change in Security Proposal for 

Protection of TAGBOA.RD End Prodl.1ct 

BYE- 542.6-69$ Subject: Security Proposal 

for Protection of TAGBCA.a.D .End Product; 

dated 10 November 1969 

1. The referenced memorandum from the TSO/CIA proposed that the end product of TAGBOARD missions be classified 

TOP SECRET, bear the codeword TAG# carry the handling caveat, 

NO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION. and be protected in the TALENT 

Control System • 

.a. DIA requests that the choice of codeword TAG be recon:id.de red. Their rationale for this propo sal followe: 

'I (1) Considering that there may be a. 

significant time period before the next D-Z 1 

photographic mission request that assigmnent 

of the COdeword TAG proposed for use on D-21 

drone film be reconsidered. 

/I (Z) Presently u.sed in the inventory of 

COMlREX-related code words are TANGO, 

TALENT, TACKLE. TAGOOARD. and TIGER. 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115158 
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115158 

TIGER is the non-BYEMAN reference to 

TAG BOA.t.lD; TANGO, the phonetic for letter 

T, is used for TALENT .. 

"(3) Suggest CHESS be used as the 

codeword lor photography taken by any air 

breathing vehicle over denied areas. TCO's 

presently have 'CHESS I staInpa and security 

classification directions. 

It (4) If the codeword CHESS is unacceptable 

suggest a four letter word be chosen that ilS as 

different from TAGBOARD as ZARF is from 

EARPOP and RUFF is from CORONA and GA.\iBIT. 

n (5) An l.UU1ecestJary risk is being taken 

with the use of TAG.. Due to its long period of 

development. many people are aware of "TAGBOARD" both officially and unofficially. To 

lltiUze a product called TAG will not reinforce 

the security attittlde that protects the secrecy of 

individual BY EMAN codewords. " 

3. The TSC/CLA has no objection to the proposal to use 

the codeword "CHESSH rather than tlTAG II. U you have no objection 

to this proposal would 10>.1 strike over the word ['TAG" in the 

referenced memorandum and replace it with "CHESS". 

I I 

TALENT Security Officer, CLA 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115158
Dr. McMillan hanicarri_. the original of

the attached memorandum to Mr. Vance at

1850, 24 March 1965.

(Place this number on origin0411114302-65)

• Copy of attached given to Stevie, 25 Mar

for onward transmittal to Gen Carter.

No other distribution.
rockway M4 llan

..; s . -a • •

wn DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE UNDUE SECRETARY

March 24, 1965

MR4ORANDUM FOR RECORD

In a telephone conversation with General Carter as of

1815 today, General Carter reported that he had sent

Mr. Crowley to Sunnyvale to assume responsibility for CIA

operations on the next CORONA mission. The gist of the

discussion is contained in the following paraphrase.

McMillan; Will Mr. Crowley be prepared to release to

General Greer or to his designated representative any and all technical information

on the health and condition of the payload.

Carter: No. He will release any information that

bears on the success of the operation or

the decision to de-orbit.

McMillan: Whose judgment will determine whether a

particular item of information is or is not

relevant to the success of the operation or

the decision to de-orbit.

Carter: Crowley's.

General Carter also stated that he was not willing to

release the calibration data on the payload commands or the

payload telemetry to General Greer or to his representatives.

• 17 1'.." •

111111111113 6.2

""777.74:

". %••f
# C_2004227EN.01000101.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 September 2004

(2004/C 227/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2219 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6832 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0981 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5401 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,12 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,768 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6611 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,428 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,402 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 154 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240,02 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,166 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 819 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7673 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5789 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5307 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8726 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,078 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1559 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2219

JPY

Japanese yen

134,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6832

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0981

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5401

ISK

Iceland króna

88,12

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,768

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6611

MTL

Maltese lira

0,428

PLN

Polish zloty

4,402

ROL

Romanian leu

41 154

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240,02

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,166

TRL

Turkish lira

1 819 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7673

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5789

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5307

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8726

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,078

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,18

ZAR

South African rand

8,1559

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Schroeder (Annie), Appellant, vs. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Martin & Martin*of Green Bay.

For the respondent: *Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Freeman,*attorneys, and *Kneeland A. Godfrey*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1999
<CASH>                                           8,401
<SECURITIES>                                    35,707
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,987)
<INVENTORY>                                    140,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,972
<PP&E>                                         178,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                (99,308)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,271
<BONDS>                                        150,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,026
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,396
<SALES>                                      1,381,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,381,531
<CGS>                                        1,256,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,360,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,500)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,021
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,934
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|---------------------- | --------------------
|                       | John P. Manning     
|                       | Director, President 
|                       | (Principal Executive
|                       | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                       | Assignor Corp.
### GREG ZOELLER INDIANA ATIORNEY GENERAL

Ms. Susan Hedman Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 5 STATE OF INDIANA 

## OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL INDIANA GOVERNMENT CENTER SOUTH,FIFfH FLOOR 30

2W .WASHINGTON STREET • INDIANAPOLIS, IN 4 6204 -2

770 

### W'ww.AttorneyGeneral.IN.gov November 10,2014

77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 TELEPHONE:31 7.23 2.62 01 FAX: 31 7.23 2.7979



### Re: AG Opinion ofIncorporation by 

### Reference of Indiana's other solid waste incineration regulation (326 lAC 11-9, LSA Document #06-437) Dear Ms. Hedman: Pursuant to my delegation of authority from the Attorney General for the State of Indiana, I give this opinion . It is my opinion that: (1) the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality (IDEM), has the ability to regulate emissions from other solid waste incineration units; (2) that the Air Pollution Control Board(replaced effective January 1, 2013, by the Environmental Rules Board under IC 13-13-8) may do so by means of an incorporation by reference of federal emission guideline provisions; and (3) that 326 lAC 11-9, regulating such facilities, is within the authority of IDEM and is enforceable. In other words, 326 lAC 11-9 adopted by the Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) on February 7, 2007 and was effective on August 9, 2007, regulates other solid waste incineration units by means of an incorporation by reference in 326 lAC 11-9-3 of federal emission guideline provisions at 40 CFR 60, Subpart FFFF. Indiana law specifically provides: (a) If incorporation ofthe text in full would be cumbersome, expensive, or otherwise inexpedient, an agency may incorporate by reference into a rule part or all of any of the following matters: (1) A federal or state statute, rule, or regulation. (2) A code, manual, or other standard adopted by an agent ofthe United States, a state, or a nationally recognized organization or association . (3) A manual ofthe department of local government finance adopted in a rule described in IC 6-1.1-31-9. (b) Each matter incorporated by reference under subsection (a) must be fully
.and exactly described. IC 4-22-2-21 (a) and IC 4-22-2-21 (b)
. Thus, this section allows the Air Pollution_ Control Board, and in the future, the Environmental Rules Board, to incorporate federal guidelines by reference. The incorporation by reference is valid and enforceable.

# Sin**>#** Matt Light Chief Deputy Attorney General (for) Attorney General Greg Zoeller cc: Ann Long, IDEM, Office of Legal Counsel
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Animal Trails and Walkways, Aquaculture Ponds, Composting Facility, Constructed Wetland, Contour Buffer Strips, Contour Farming, Contour Orchard and Other Perennial Crops, Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Filter Strip, Fish Passage, Fish Raceway or Tank, Forest Trails and Landings, Grade Stabilization Structure, Grassed Waterway, Heavy Use Area Protection, Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control, Lined Waterway or Outlet, Recreation Land Grading and Shaping, Structure for Water Control, Terrace, Trails and Walkways, Underground Outlet, Vegetated Treatment Area , Waste Storage Facility, Water and Sediment Control Basin.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# C_2004118EN.01004201.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/42

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Fifth Chamber)

of 2 April 2004

in Case T-337/03: Luis Bertelli Gálvez v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for failure to act - Procedure laid down in Article 7 EU - Complaint of alleged breaches of the principles set out in Article 6(1) EU by the Spanish judicial authorities - Clear lack of jurisdiction)

(2004/C 118/91)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-337/03: Luis Bertelli Gálvez, represented by J. Puche Rodríguez-Acosta, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities – application made under the third subparagraph of Article 232 EC seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to bring against the Kingdom of Spain the procedure laid down in Article 7 EU following the complaint made by the applicant regarding alleged breaches affecting him of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, set out in Article 6 EU, by the judicial authorities of that Member State – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | the action is dismissed because it is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the action is dismissed because it is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction;

| 2. | the applicant is to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

the applicant is to bear his own costs.

---

(1)  Not yet published.

1

---
Prepared by MerrillDirect





Exhibit 10.2


 


BONUS
ARRANGEMENT


 


               On April 13, 2000,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted Michael P. Brennan
a bonus of $60,000 in connection with the closing of the transaction between
Peapod and Koninklijke Ahold N.V., 1/3 of which was paid on June 30, 2000 and
1/3 of which will become payable on each of the first and second anniversaries
of the closing.  Each payment of this
bonus is conditioned upon Mr. Brennan’s continued employment with Peapod
through the respective payment date.
Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s
Internal Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's
Certificates Relative to the Servicing of Home Loan
Receivables

October 23, 2002

We, as members of management of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.,
(the Company) are responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of home loan
receivables owned by Chevy Chase Home Loan Trusts Series
1996-1 and 1997-1 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein).
Internal control is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Company's management and board of directors regarding the
preparation of reliable monthly Servicer's Certificates. Internal
control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates
relative to the servicing of home loan receivables owned by the
Trusts includes self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken
to correct deficiencies as they are identified. Because of inherent
limitations in any internal control, no matter how well-designed,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected,
including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of
controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Trusts can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to monthly
Servicer's Certificates preparation. Further, because of changes in
conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

The Company assessed its internal control over the preparation of
monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of home
loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of September 30, 2002
based on criteria for effective internal control over financial
reporting described in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework"
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, we assert that
the Company maintained effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of
September 30, 2002 based on the specified criteria.


  /s/  Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.         /s/ Mark A. Holles
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.			Mark A. Holles
Executive Vice President and Chief 	Group Vice President
Financial Officer

 /s/  Joel A. Friedman                /s/  Thomas E. Uglietta
Joel A. Friedman			Thomas E. Uglietta
Senior Vice President and Controller 	Vice President