alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50239

USDC No. W-93-CA-37

__________________

SYNNACHIA McQUEEN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RAUL MATA, Captain; BRYANT L. EPPS;

JACK M. GARNER, Warden;

FREDERICK LANGEHENNIG, Subst. Counselor,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

November 7, 1995

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is the appeal of the judgment for Bryant Epps following

a jury trial. The appellant's motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is DENIED.

The appellant contends that the district court erred by

denying his motion in limine to prohibit any reference to the

conviction for which he is incarcerated; erred by instructing the

jury to consider whether Epps acted in good faith if it found
No. 95-50239

-2-

that Epps had violated his right to due process; erred by failing

to instruct the jury regarding his claim that Epps deprived him

of his right to present documentary evidence at a prison

disciplinary hearing; and erred by declining to admit a prison

activity log into evidence. The appellant also contends that the

verdict was contrary to the evidence. We have reviewed the trial

transcript and conclude that the appeal is frivolous.

We admonished the appellant on October 11, 1995, to examine

his pending appeals and to withdraw any frivolous appeals. We

reiterate that admonishment and further warn the appellant that

any future frivolous appeals will result in sanctions against

him.

APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GILBERT LEANDER DAVIS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-4970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DANIEL PAUL DEBNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CR-04-167)

Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Roberson, Columbia, South Carolina; W. James Hoffmeyer,

LAW OFFICE OF W. JAMES HOFFMEYER, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellants. Jonathan S. Gasser, Acting United States Attorney,

Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert Leander Davis, Jr., and Daniel Paul Debner appeal

from their sentences imposed pursuant to their guilty pleas to

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a quantity of

cocaine. Appellants assert that the district court erred under

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), by sentencing them

for crack cocaine, because they did not admit to a conspiracy

involving crack cocaine. In addition, Davis asserts that his

firearm enhancement violated Booker.

We agree that there was Booker error. Appellants were

sentenced under the mandatory guideline scheme and received more

than the maximum sentence permitted by the facts admitted. See

United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 547 (4th Cir. 2005).

However, because the district court imposed identical, alternative

sentences in the event that the guidelines were found to be

non-binding, any error was harmless. See United States v. Shatley,

448 F.3d 264, 266-67 (4th Cir. 2006). The district court followed

our recommendation in United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th

Cir.), vacated, 543 U.S. 1097 (2005); its alternative sentences

were within the range recommended by the sentencing guidelines, and

we take the district court at its word when it stated that it would

impose the same sentences under the advisory guideline system.

Shatley, 448 F.3d at 267-68. 
- 4 -

Accordingly, we affirm Appellants’ sentences. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005106EN.01002401.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/24

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 March 2005

in Case T-185/03 Vincenzo Fusco v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ENZO FUSCO - Earlier Community word mark ANTONIO FUSCO - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity between signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 106/54)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-185/03: Vincenzo Fusco, residing in Sarmeola di Rubano (Italy), represented by B. Saguatti, lawyer, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto and P. Bullock), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Antonio Fusco International SA Lussemburgo, Lugano subsidiary, established in Lugano (Switzerland), represented by M. Bosshard, S. Verea and K. Muraro — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 March 2003 in Case R 1023/2001-4, — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 1 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
# C_2004243EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 September 2004

(2004/C 243/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2323 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,441 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6818 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0526 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5509 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,65 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,351 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,576 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,628 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,665 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4279 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3617 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 085 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,97 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,04 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 853 300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7202 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5661 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6107 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8408 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0864 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 420,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9579 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2323

JPY

Japanese yen

136,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,441

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6818

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0526

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5509

ISK

Iceland króna

87,65

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,351

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,576

CZK

Czech koruna

31,628

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,665

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4279

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3617

ROL

Romanian leu

41 085

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,97

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,04

TRL

Turkish lira

1 853 300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7202

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5661

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6107

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8408

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0864

KRW

South Korean won

1 420,97

ZAR

South African rand

7,9579

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.3



                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, MiniMed Inc. (the "Company") and Eric S. Kentor (the "Executive") have
entered into that certain Change of Control Agreement dated March 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires pursuant to its terms on March 1, 2001; and

WHEREAS, the Company considers it essential and in the best interest of its
stockholders to continue to foster the continuous employment of key management
personnel and to continue to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and
dedication of the Executive to his assigned duties without distraction in the
face of potentially disturbing circumstances arising from the possibility of a
change in control of the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


1.   The preamble to Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety
     and replaced with the following:

     "1.  Payment of Severance Benefits Upon Change of Control. In the event of
          a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in Section 3) during
          the two-year period starting March 1, 2001, the Executive shall be
          entitled to the benefits set forth in Section 2 (the "Severance
          Benefits"), but only if:"

2.   All other terms and conditions in the Agreement, including but not limited
     to the remaining provisions of Section 1, shall remain unchanged and in
     full force and effect.

3.   This Amendment shall be effective as of March 1, 2001.

4.   This Amendment may be executed in two counterparts each of which shall be
     deemed an original but both of which together shall constitute one and the
     same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both the Executive and the Company have caused this
amendment to be executed by himself or by its duly authorized representatives,
respectively:

         MINIMED INC.

     By: /s/ Terrance H. Gregg            By: /s/ Eric S. Kentor
         ---------------------                -------------------
                                              Eric S. Kentor

     Its: President & COO
          --------------------
1 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2007-1032 

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; Interstate 

Transport of Pollution Revisions for the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS: “Significant 

Contribution to Nonattainment” Requirement 

DATE: Update March 16, 2010 

 January 14, 2010 

SUBJECT: EPA's Guidance and Supporting Documentation - Proposed Rulemaking Federal 

Register: "Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of 

Colorado; Interstate Transport of Pollution Revisions for the 1997 8-hour Ozone 

NAAQS: “Significant Contribution to Nonattainment” Requirement 

FROM: Domenico Mastrangelo, Environmental Engineer 

Office of Partnership and Regulatory Assistance 

Air and Radiation Program (8P-AR) 

TO: Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2007-1032 

CONTENTS 

GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM

1. EPA – August 15, 2006: "Guidance for State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submissions to 

Meet Current Outstanding Obligations Under Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 8-Hour Ozone and 

PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards;" signed by William Harnett, Director, Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards. 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

1. EPA – Nonattainment Areas Map for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Standard. 

2. Table 1. 8-Hour Ozone Monitoring Data and Design Values for Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, 

Nebraska and Wyoming; 1998-2008. 
2 

3. County Maps for Colorado and Neighboring States (Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and 

Wyoming.) 

4. State of Wisconsin’s September 2009 attainment demonstration for the Wisconsin 

nonattainment counties along the western shore of Lake Michigan. 

5. “Climatology of Ozone Synoptic Scale Transport in the Eastern US;” Ozone Transport 

Assessment Group (OTAG), January 11, 1998. 

6. State of Kansas January 4, 2007 SIP submittal to EPA Region 7: Interstate Transport of 

Pollution. 

7. “Ozone as Function of Local Wind Speed and Direction: Evidence of Local and Regional 

Transport,” OTAG, July 26, 1997.
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Robert Brussel, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc. (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2002

                                                     /s/ Robert Brussel
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Robert Brussel,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     of the Company
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0292

_____________________________

CLIFFORD LEON REID,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized 

motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Clifford Leon Reid, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM June 2022

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Initial setting: pastureland, rangeland, grazed forest, 

and native pastures where the slopes are less than 30 

percent.

1. Soil surface physically disturbed 

by mechanized equipment

Start

2. Plant community physically 

disturbed by mechanized equipment

3. Soil subsoil physically disturbed by 

mechanized equipment

3

I.5 (+) Soil 

erosion

I.4 (+) Noxious or 

invasive plants

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D.4 (+) Cost- for 

treatment

D.1 (+) Soil permeability D.2 (+) Soil exposure D.3 (-) Plant crowding/ 

root bound conditions

Pasture and Hay 

Planting (512)

I.6 (+) Particulate Matter 

(PM-10)/ Sediment

Pest Management 

Conservation System 

(595)

GRAZING LAND MECHANICAL TREATMENT 

(548)

LAND MECHANICAL 

TREATMENT

I.3 (+) Dissolved 

pollutants to ground 

water

C.1 (+) Plant productivity, diversity, 

and vigor

C.2 (+) Livestock 

production

C.3 (+) Income/ 

profitability

Range Planting (550)

Nutrient Management 

(590)

I.2 (+) Water infiltration

I.1 (-) Water runoff

Prescribed Grazing (528)
1008 —TOPINIETNRO STAFF

?(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C.

3 June 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

MEP •

SUBJECT: Status of ACDA Simulations

een requested to perform

for ACDA who is represente y

Bert Aschenbrenner. The las,weld in

8 May. At that meeting, as

u sted to determine the 10-day per od during

SepteMber-October with relatively heavy cloud cover

and to determine the probability of East Germany and

Poland being completely cloud covered for 10, 8, 6,

4, and 2 consecutive days. The first and part of the

second requirements haVe been accomplished.

ll1/1,11111111"s 

requested to provide Ht. Aschenbrennet

wi f the SPS MBFR targets. This has been

done.

Mr. Ascbenbrenner was requested to provid ith

the written simulation scenarios. These have no eti

received. He also desires to delay simulat ntil he

decides resolution cutoff based on Projec results.

In anticipation of the simulation targetiand area

files have been created and are being held. Some of these

may need to be reformatted slightl y when n

•

CLAISII14111111crouPLOOM

1111NORAI f Of —Tip—suRET-- cop, OF COPIES

. OXICUTIVL OMAN /11142 axitarnad CAT&

1. 001tV SOO oacussary ON air Olt PAOC_LO• PAGES

CONTROL NO Internal
IP-SECRET-

-15t-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF December 3, 1973

NOTE FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: FY 74-FY 75 Funding

•

The following is an update on the current situation

regarding potential NIP funding cuts for FY 74 and FY 75.

As you kn ppropriations Committee recommended

in FY 74 eduction to the SDS program.

a1 recommendation ctions of

lion to fund the C

llion of RDT&E. itio 

ackage and

After discussions with the IC Staff, I agreed that John

Clark would have the initial contact with the Senate Appropriations Committee Staff. If additional information was required

or if the'Committee desired direct contact, these requests

would be passed to the NRO Comptroller or the DNRO. Mr. Guy

McConnell, the Committe ant who is cl

agreed to reinstate the or SDS and th

for the CES acka e. He thing could b

cerning th &E cut. On Fr•er 30,

Senator NC this approach.

subsequ change the appro es

for the

be 3600 ropy a a•riation.

With this minor modifica we can e with the reduction and

still stay within the November ExCom decisions.

Also on Friday, Dr. LaBerge and Dr. Currie discussed potential

RDT&E cuts in FY 75. They suggested an approximate 10 percent

cut to our Special Activities account. This is

of TAB A. It amounts to a proposed re

and leaves us with a revised program of

q

41111111111 CLASSNISMIIIIPXIMPT MON SINSRAL swum, co juiEciff_.

mama OMNI MSS anwimota ChM

CONTROL STS NA soar ISE OICLAIMPV ON IMP CST.

CONTROL NO

COPT OF comas

PAGE OF PAGES
Coincidentally, within terms

the NRP requir

to this should b

is currently not

pr . r

Assistant ecretary s office

worked out.

of the No sion,

s is Added

or U-2 s which

FY 75 in either the Air Force

and the U-2 requirements is

re than the suggested revised,

contact with the people in the

and this difference should be

In this particular instance the fact that the resulting

available funds and requirements came out almost the same,

was accidental but also very fortunate. I will continue to

keep you informed of new developments.

JOHN E. KULPA, JR.

Brigadier General, USAF

-TIP-SMUTetatoDel 002413samn •••• esusA NuAls..e..Awavoukas es

assarma sena ••n•8 a aterftip.vm

11111111110.Msto • oft pm se,

CONTROL NO Tnternal

con,

or COM ES

PAGE 2 PAGES
# C_2005134EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 May 2005

(2005/C 134/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2331 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1608 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5372 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,81 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9390 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9554 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,372 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1160 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 215 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,48 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,064 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6748 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6309 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5531 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5926 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7454 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0552 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 242,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2849 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2058 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3270 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 723,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,686 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,229 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,8370 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,058 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2331

JPY

Japanese yen

133,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67710

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1608

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5372

ISK

Iceland króna

79,81

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9390

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9554

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

30,372

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1160

ROL

Romanian leu

36 215

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,48

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,064

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6748

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6309

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5531

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5926

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7454

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0552

KRW

South Korean won

1 242,90

ZAR

South African rand

8,2849

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2058

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3270

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 723,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,686

PHP

Philippine peso

67,229

RUB

Russian rouble

34,8370

THB

Thai baht

50,058

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) (10/2020) Standard Document(62.31 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) Overview(293.13 KB)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) CPPE(25.44 KB)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Ac.) (315) Network Diagram(91.92 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More