alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005031EN.01000602.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Østre Landsret by decision of that court of 16 November 2004 in the case of Laserdisken ApS against Kulturministeriet

(Case C-479/04)

(2005/C 31/14)

Language of the case: Danish

By order of 16 November 2004 of the Østre Landsret (Eastern Regional Court), Denmark, received at the Court Registry on 19 November 2004, reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling in the case of Laserdisken ApS against Kulturministeriet on the following questions:

| 1. | Is Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) invalid? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) invalid?

1

| 2. | Does Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society preclude a Member State from retaining international exhaustion in its legislation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society preclude a Member State from retaining international exhaustion in its legislation?

The second question is aimed at clarifying whether a Member State wishing to accord greater weight to freedom of expression and citizens' access to cultural goods than to the wish to protect national rightholders against competition may derogate from Article 4(2).

---

(1)  OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.9


$200,000                    Fort Lauderdale, Florida               July 7, 2000


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


For value received, the undersigned Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc., a Florida
corporation ("Maker"), promises to pay in lawful money of the United States of
America to the order of C. Rodney O'Connor ("Holder"), the principal sum of Two
Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($200,000.00), together with interest
thereon from the date hereof at the rate of two percent (2%) over the Prime
Rate, as announced from time to time by Bank Atlantic, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida,
per annum on the unpaid balance.

Principal and interest shall be due in a single payment one year from the date
of this Promissory Note, except that Holder may demand payment at any time.

All payments shall be made to holder at 640 Fifth Avenue, 15th Floor, New York,
NY 10019, or at such further address as Holder may notify Maker. Maker may
prepay all or any portion of the obligation evidenced hereby at any time without
premium or penalty.

Maker expressly waives presentment, protest, demand, notice of dishonor or
default, and notice of every other kind and type with respect to this Promissory
Note and default hereunder. Holder's failure to accelerate or take any other
permitted action under this Promissory Note shall not operate as a waiver of
Holder's rights thereunder.

This Promissory Note shall be construed under the laws of the State of Florida,
and venue for any action hereunder shall lie in the County in Broward County,
Florida. Maker agrees to pay the costs of collection, including a reasonable
attorney's fee.

                                 STREICHER MOBILE FUELING, INC.
                                      a Florida corporation



                                 By: /s/ Walter B. Barrett
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Walter B. Barrett, Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Object Design, Inc. on Form S-8 (files no. 333-14741 and 333-31521) of our
reports dated February 11, 1998, on our audits of the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedule of Object Design, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years ended December 31,
1997, 1996, and 1995 which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.



                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
Internal

.441-411"t111.3411111111011,=1, Paw .

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. •

SUBJECT: Description of Duties - NRO Communications Officer

In addition to the NRO Staff functional responsibilities

provided to Dr. NicLucas, I recognize that the NRO Communications Officer fills a unique role in support of the NRO.

As in the past, I desire that the NRO Staff point of contact

for the NRO Communications Officer be the Deputy Director

for Plans and Policy. The more detailed functions of the

NRO Communications Officer are listed in the attachment to

this memorandum.

DAVID D. BRADBURN

Brigadier General, USAF

Director

1 Attachment

Responsibilities of

NRO Comm Officer

_TOP-SECREr

MUM ION aingsma 1110111111101

sesems us 11• isis 11011111PM

•
.11n111

002

roam% 51511 n

•

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

CONIUNI CATION OFFICER

Advise the Deputy Director for Plans and Policy, National

Reconnaissance Office Staff, of all matters having a significant impact on NRO communications.

Provide communications services for the NRO. In carrying

out these duties, coordinate closely with Hq USAF, Hq AFCS,

and major air commands to arrange for:

leasing or procurement of circuits and equipment;

manpower authorizations and properly cleared/

trained personnel to operate and maintain NRO communication

facilities.

Supervise communication security for USAF-operated NRO

communication facilities and develop a high level of security

consciousness, knowledge, and discipline at each communication

center.

Interpret NRO communication security policy and criteria

for detailed application to operating procedures.

Establish regular inspections of NRO communication facilities to insure that operating procedures are in accordance

with security policy. Report results of these inspections to

the Deputy Director for Plans and Policy, NRO Staff.

Provide frequent briefings to the Deputy Director for Plans

and Policy, NRO Staff, on the overall status, and plans for,

the NRO Communication network. Advance planning and definition

of requirements for new or upgraded communication services will

be reviewed and approved by the Deputy Director for Plans and

Policy, NRO Staff. Proposed changes which will affect specific

NRO Program Office communications or network interconnection

will be reviewed and approved by the Deputy Director for Plans

and Policy, NRO Staff, prior to review by NRO Program Directors.

INTERNAL

'Kum,' Des aoloosht moissipbe

Ies sai1eu•11 IMO *• ISIS WO •••11

►apt 1 sr razes
Exhibit
33.1


CERTIFICATION
REPORT





Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting of the company. Internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.





The
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.





Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





Management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2007.





Date:
March
25,
2008                                                                By:
/s/ Joseph
M. Cummins


Joseph M. Cummins


President,
Chief Executive Officer





Date:
March
25,
2008                                                                By:
/s/ Gary
W. Coy


Gary W. Coy


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
.....

. .......maltir

`'• , • . • JII MINWAL ar ara erza . m

7•,

:•

.." :. e v.•:f-.- el- i , • 7 . : DPGJEC T :: .-„:"' r-i--1,11"1"" wales WIZ f.

" 4 . .6* •• . '4 Ln 7: C oek apao

10 Jul 59 toYeA

IMMRINVIMMU

ilEh101LANDUM TOR THE =DV& St CILILTAILT OP THE Ant !"DACE

SUDJW.C?: Northwest U. L Tracking sad Data Auptisit.tor. Stu-o.. .

Project SAMOS

I have year /1401/A0/4111411111 01 211. regaeetias sty

conearresee to year proceeding with caestrectiaa at the Northwest

Tracking sad Data Aapiattoe Stenos at Pit ateseas. ()resat.

lailtalaig Air Terra hada.

As indicated is try dispatch at June 25. 1951 (copy attached)

it is mows cerrant view that project SAMOS should be reviewed

is the light at available tends for TT 1940 azd we are proceeding

irte. this review as espoditionslv as patellae We will Include lc

this review the toclesic.al caasideratese for a northwest Station

as opposed t.s the Yandeabers Station as origizally planned.

Furthermore, there appears to be ensinausa with respect to the

utamatina of a Northwest ?Yachts/ and Data Acquisitise Station

to minims the Alaska.% SWAIM for satellite recovery p•.arposen,

as oat/Meg ATMAID d!spatr.t. of June 3. l oSO. A recent preen:must by ArliktD to WA on Project MERCURY traclusg

ladicated that the Alaskan Station, is tmeatmiactery for capsule

recovery purposes and that it wan proposed to accomplish this

operation Iran a new stamen to be located in Zest Africa.

Tor these reasaas I eaaaM concur at this time IL year

proposed action sad mama that the ceastructies set be itutieted

gull we have ceespleted oar program rerv•-ew.

Ray w. Johnsen

Director

1 lael

TWIL DIN 941411

Z3 has 59

4 -

UFOS PE AL OF ATIACIDOOSS 7Sn

DOCEDIES7 SNOWS UNCL

•
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to, and solely for purposes of, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), each of the undersignedhereby certifies in the capacity and on the date indicated below that:

 

1.                                       The QuarterlyReport of Cache, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Cache, Inc.

 

 
| November 10,  2010 | By:      | /s/  Thomas E. Reinckens                              |
|-------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |     | Thomas  E. Reinckens                                  |
|                    | * * | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*                |
|                    |     | (Principal  Executive Officer)                        |
|                    |     |                                                  |
|                    |     |                                                  |
| November 10,  2010 | By:      | /s/  Margaret Feeney                                  |
|                    |     | Margaret  Feeney                                      |
|                    |     | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                    |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)          |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.16




February 24, 1998

Robert E. Gilkes
363 Barretts Mill Road
Concord, MA  01742

Dear Bob:

I am pleased that you have accepted the position of special advisor to the Board
of Directors of Xionics Document Technologies, Inc., and would like to outline
the terms and conditions applicable to your service in that capacity.

We have agreed that you will provide advice and counsel to the Board on various
matters relating to the Company's strategic direction from January 1, 1998
through July 31, 1999. Your primary contact will be with Paul Low, Chairman of
the Board. Your gross salary will be Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) per month
for the months of January through December, 1998, and Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) per month for the months of January through July, 1999. You will of
course continue to be eligible to participate in the Company's benefit plans,
and the Invention and Nondisclosure Agreement between you and the Company dated
November 13, 1995, as amended, will continue in effect in accordance with its
terms. A copy of it is enclosed for your convenience. The arrangement described
above is terminable by you at any time, and by Xionics in the event of any
breach of your obligations under that Invention and Nondisclosure Agreement.

Bob, if the foregoing paragraph correctly states our agreement, please so
indicate by signing both copies of this letter in the space provided below and
return one to me, keeping the other for your records.

Sincerely,

XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

/s/ PETER J. SIMONE

Peter J. Simone
President and Chief Executive Officer


Accepted:

/s/ ROBERT E. GILKES                        Date: February 25, 1998       
----------------------------------                -----------------------------
Robert E. Gilkes
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of NextPhase  Wireless,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB for the period  ended  December  31, 2004 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  February 14, 2005                        /s/ Robert Ford
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert Ford
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Accounting Officer
#### Doe on demise of Whitehurst and wife, v. Banks.

~) { w ,, „ , ¡>í rom Beaufort.

*Ejectment.*— The declaration contained but one demise of the whole tract of land therein *described;*Plaintiffs proved title to an undivided third part only, as tenants in common with one Joseph White.

Defendant claimed the whole tract under a purchase made at a Sheriff’s sale by virtue of an execution, to *347Which Defendant was not a party, and on the trial produced in evidence tlie Sheriff’s deed, and the execution, but did not produce the judgment. It also appeared that to one ninth part of the tract, Plaintiffs had a title not derived through the person against whom the execution had issued.

The Judge charged that though Plaintiffs had declared for the whole, yet they might recover an undivided third part; and that the Defendant claiming under a Sheriff’s deed was bound to produce the judgment as well as the execution. Yerdict for Plaintiffs, new trial refused and appeal.

Pjexi Curiam.

The case of *Boe on demise of Bryan*v. *Brown,*decided at this term, settles this case. Sale for a new trial discharged.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 1288

Unemployed

Number in thousands

50 to 54 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024937Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 50-54 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:33 PM)
#### Howard, Respondent, vs. Anderholm, imp., Appellant.

For the appellant: *W. T. Kennedy*of Amery and *W. T. Doar*of New Richmond.

For the respondent: *Coe Brothers*of Barron and *W. H. Frawley*of Eau Claire.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2252 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2252

  To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to place a ten-year 
 moratorium on oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities 
  on the Outer Continental Shelf in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, 
   South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas and in the 
                        Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2017

  Mr. Sanford (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to place a ten-year 
 moratorium on oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities 
  on the Outer Continental Shelf in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, 
   South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas and in the 
                        Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coastal Economies Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED 
              ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Moratorium on Oil and Natural Gas Preleasing, Leasing, and 
Related Activities in Certain Areas of the Outer Continental Shelf.--
            ``(1) Moratorium.--Effective during the period beginning on 
        the date of enactment of this subsection and ending on June 30, 
        2027, the Secretary shall not offer for leasing, preleasing, or 
        any related activity on the following geographic areas of the 
        outer Continental Shelf:
                    ``(A) The North Atlantic planning area.
                    ``(B) The Mid-Atlantic planning area.
                    ``(C) The South Atlantic planning area.
                    ``(D) The Straits of Florida Planning Area.
                    ``(E) The area of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico 
                described in section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico 
                Energy Security Act of 2006 (title I of division C of 
                Public Law 109-432; 43 U.S.C. 1331 note).
            ``(2) Limitation on effect.--Nothing in this subsection 
        affects any right under any lease issued under this Act before 
        the date of the enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hill’s Dry Goods Company, Appellant, vs. Wigonitz and another, Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Dane county dated March 30, 1927: August C. Hoppmann, Judge, x

Injunction. Order vacating temporary injunction, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant: *Gilbert, Ela, Heilman & Raeder*of Madison.

For the respondents: *Olbrich & Siebecker*of Madison.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certifies as of June 30, 2003 to the UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, as follows:

      1. The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intelligent Systems Corporation
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 which accompanies this statement fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. Information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Intelligent Systems Corporation.

Date: August 14, 2003                           /s/ J. Leland Strange
                                                ------------------------
                                                 J. Leland Strange
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Solely for thepurposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the Director of Finance ofAML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

•                                  the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•                                  the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 
| Dated: April 18,  2005                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
|                                                  |
| /s/ Susan J.  Kelley                                  |   |
| Susan J. Kelley,  Formerly: Susan J. Fite             |
|                                                  |
| Director of  Finance and Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----