alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                          OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED
                             1993 stock option plan
                      (as amended through august 19, 1999)

This Amendment to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan, as
previously amended through August 19, 1999, is made effective as of April 19,
2001.

                                    RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Optical Sensors Incorporated (the "Company")
approved an amendment to the Optical Sensors Incorporated 1993 Stock Option
Plan(the "Option Plan") by unanimous written consent effective April 19, 2001;
and

WHEREAS, this Amendment is entered into to give effect to such action of the
Board of Directors of the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Option Plan is hereby amended as follows effective as April
19, 2001:

         1. Section 9.1(c) of the Option Plan is hereby amended in its entirety
to read as follows:

         (c)      any Person, other than Hayden R. Fleming or Circle F Ventures,
                  LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, or any of his or its
                  Affiliates, is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined
                  in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly,
                  of (a) 20 percent or more, but not more than 50 percent, of
                  the combined voting power of the Company's outstanding
                  securities ordinarily having the right to vote at elections of
                  directors, unless the transaction resulting in such ownership
                  has been approved in advance by the "continuity directors," as
                  defined at Subsection (b), or (b) more than 50 percent of the
                  combined voting power of the Company's outstanding securities
                  ordinarily having the right to vote at elections of directors
                  (regardless of any approval by the continuity directors).

         2. To record this Amendment to the Option Plan as set forth above, the
Company has caused this Amendment to be signed on its behalf by its Chief
Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer as of the date first set forth
above.

OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED


By: /s/ Paulita M. LaPlante
    -----------------------------------------
    Paulita M. LaPlante
    President and Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ Wesley G. Peterson
    -----------------------------------------
    Wesley G. Peterson
    Chief Financial Officer
-TOP-SECRET-- 111111111

(SI NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. 11111411111111111111111111

THE NRO STAFF January 14, 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. NAKA Vk Ac

COLONEL SWEENY

SUBJECT: Visit by Colonel Campbell from State Department

You will recall that we had an informal briefing set

up today for Mr. Bob Packard and Colonel Dick Campbell

from the Office of Space Atmospheric and Marine Science

Affairs at State (Mr. Packard is the Director). Although

our meeting was postponed when Mr. Packard was called away

at the last moment, Colonel Campbell did visit with us.

As a consequence we have rescheduled our briefing to 0930',

February 9, 1971, after Mr. Packard returns from his Moscow

trip.

The Moscow trip is the second recent attempt to

establish greater cooperation with the Soviets in the

space area. You will recall that several months ago

the subject of rescue of astronauts and compatible docking

mechanisms were discussed. Next week greater cooperation

in the passing of weather satellite data will be a topic.

We understand that among the alternatives that may be

considered are offering the Soviets the use of one of our

ESSA satellite vidicom systems for use on their spacecraft

or perhaps making available ground read out stations to

permit direct read out from one of the ESSA birds. There

is a possibility that the ERTS Program may be discussed,

but this is not a firm agenda item.

---TOP-SEGREF---

a mosso I.or reorp c74 n rca** or

Internal COMTOOL

wry

or corm

mis N‘tik
Colonel Campbell brought with him a copy of a letter

proposed for Ambassador Johnson's signature to Mr. Packard

and Dr. Low. The subject is re-entry and identification

of space fragments. This has implications for us in that

it could lead to a new U.S. initiative before the U.N. for

advanded notification of launches, more timely reporting

of orbital*parameteri, and detailed identification of all

partS of a satellite payload. These are items which have

been brought up before but have never been firmly accepted.

Colonel Campbell suggested that if we had strong reservations,

he would try to stop the letter before it is signed out. We

agreed that it would probably be better to let the State

Department letter be sent for it is highly doubtful that

the subject would be acceptable to the member states of the

United Nations. The reason for the letter is that the

Soviets have so far failed to acknowledge that the space

debris which fell in the Western states several months ago

came from one of their spacecraft, nor have they agreed to

accept it when offered to them by the State Department.

Colonel Campbell reports that State plans to ask the Soviets

one more time to take their debris and failing to do so

State intends to make the debris available for press viewing

in a manner which will undoubtedly embarrass the Soviet Union.

I objected to this on the basis that it would serve no useful

purpose and seems contradictory in light of the discussions

to be conducted next week in Moscow.

FREDERICK L.L. HOFMANN

Major, USAF

1 Attachment

Proposed Letter

--—TOVSECRET

scum,. nom •1411111M11

MIMS. m Internal 

eery

or torsos

"us
1 April 1965

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: The ITEK111111111Case

This noon I had lunch with Ted Walkowicz and the first opportunity to recount the dramatic ITEK action of 24 February. The

discussion consisted of (1) an account by Ted of the situation as he

experienced it, (2) my experience, and (3) some thoughts for the

future. Several key points developed - many of them news to me.

Ted's Experience 

Ted was called by Mr. McCone immediately upon his (Ted's)

return from a Rio de Janeiro vacation. McCaw: "No company of

mine would ever be allowed to sign a contract like the one you signed

with us. "

Ted met McCone at CIA Hes uarters. Bross had finished

an investigation of ITEK McCone agreed that there

was no sign of a "pay-off orbuy-off. Ted made two concessions:

He feels Levison and Company should have notified

Wheelon and then let Wheelon carry the word to the Land Committee

(or perhaps compromise internally).

He feels Lindsay should have communicated his dissatisfaction to McCone much earlier in the game, i. e.. as soon as it

became troublesome to him.

3. Wheelon accosted Ted immediately after the McCone encounter. He was "livid" and harangued Ted for a long time. Ted asked,

"What about the future?" Wheelon demanded that Ted fire Lindsay,

Philbrick, Levison, and Wolfe prior to any possible discussion of

future work. Ted demurred: said perhaps more discussion later on.

Handle via BYEMA1

Control System
TOP S7(7-",.

My Experience

I recounted what is in my memoranda for record on this subject.

The Future 

Ted will stand by his people. No one will be fired. He thinks

highly of Lindsa and has talked personally to Levison. ITEK has

been given; o help cooperate withand

to produce a model of "something we'll be proud to s alliMilhovMtcMillan.

PA . WORTHMAN

Colonel, USAF

,i13;131 t %;..

• "' A i/ 'sr -T-ctstettEr

-•••• r• '4 :!i '""
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 14 - 0578 Directorate ID : 20 13 - SW - 048 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Deutschland Helicopters Model MBB - BK 117C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Airbus Deutschlan d Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The proposed actions are intended to prevent the loss of an attachment screw, which could result in movement of the output lever in an axial direction, contact of a bolt connecting the control rod to an output lev er with the actuator housing, and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs : Applying torque and torque marking to the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator output levers would require 1 work - hour for a labor cost of $85. No parts would be needed, so the cost for the U.S. fleet would total $8,500. Visually inspecting for correct torque would require 0.5 work - hour for a labor cost of about $43. No parts would be needed, so the total cost for the U.S. fleet would be $4,300 per inspection cycle. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant e conomic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Wilbanks
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 605/2006

of 19 April 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 349/2003 suspending the introduction into the Community of specimens of certain species of wild fauna and flora

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (1) and in particular Article 19(2) thereof,

After consulting the Scientific Review Group,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 349/2003 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2006.

For the Commission

Stavros DIMAS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1332/2005 (OJ L 215, 19.8.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 250, 19.9.2001, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 51, 26.2.2003, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 252/2005 (OJ L 43, 15.2.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

Specimens of species included in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 338/97 whose introduction into the Community is suspended

Specimens of species included in Annex B to Regulation (EC) No 338/97 whose introduction into the Community is suspended

----

(1)  Namely animals born in captivity but for which the criteria of Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 1808/2001 are not met, as well as parts and derivatives thereof.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1170 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 233
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1170

                          [Report No. 114-144]

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
            breast cancer research, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

   Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
   Ayotte, Mr. Tester, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
 Barrasso, Mr. Hatch, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Reid, 
   Mr. Cochran, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
Grassley, Mr. Casey, Mr. Graham, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Toomey) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 17, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
            breast cancer research, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Breast Cancer Research Stamp 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2019''.

SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL POSTAGE STAMP SALES 
              ARE USED FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is amended in 
the matter following subparagraph (B) by adding at the end the 
following: ``An agency that receives amounts from the Postal Service 
under this paragraph shall use the amounts for breast cancer 
research.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 233

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1170

                          [Report No. 114-144]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
            breast cancer research, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 17, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```
# C_2004284EN.01000401.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 23 September 2004

in Case C-150/03 P: Chantal Hectors v European Parliament (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Temporary staff in the European Parliament's political groups - Recruitment - Rejection of candidature - Grounds - Requirement of a statement of specific reasons)

(2004/C 284/07)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-150/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged at the Court on 31 March 2003, by Chantal Hectors, residing at Mont-sur-Rolle (Switzerland), (represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levis, avocats), the other party to the proceedings being: European Parliament (Agents: H. von Hertzen and J.F. de Wachter) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of 23 January 2003 of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-181/01 Hectors v Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of 23 January 2003 of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-181/01 Hectors v Parliament;

| 2. | Annuls the decisions of the authority competent to conclude contracts of employment appointing Mr B to the post of Dutch-language administrator in the European People's Party (Christian-Democrats) and European Democrats Group of the European Parliament and rejecting Ms Hectors' candidature for that post, as well as the decision rejecting her complaint; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decisions of the authority competent to conclude contracts of employment appointing Mr B to the post of Dutch-language administrator in the European People's Party (Christian-Democrats) and European Democrats Group of the European Parliament and rejecting Ms Hectors' candidature for that post, as well as the decision rejecting her complaint;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs of the appeal and, in addition to its own costs, half of Ms Hectors' costs before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs of the appeal and, in addition to its own costs, half of Ms Hectors' costs before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10 May 2003.

1

---
# C_2005045EN.01001903.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/19

---

Removal from the register of Case C-146/03 P (1)

1

(2005/C 45/37)

(Language of the case: English)

(Language of the case: English)

By order of 17 November 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-146/03 P: Philip Morris International Inc. v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 146 of 21.06.2003.

1

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1139 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require States to provide 

for same day registration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require 

States to provide for same day registration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Same Day Registration 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Help America 

8 Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating sections 304 and 305 as 

10 sections 305 and 306, respectively; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1139 IS

1 (2) by inserting after section 303 the following 

2 new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 304. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 ‘‘(1) REGISTRATION.—Notwithstanding section 

6 8(a)(1)(D) of the National Voter Registration Act of 

7 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20507), each State shall permit 

8 any eligible individual on the day of a Federal elec9 tion and on any day when voting, including early 

10 voting, is permitted for a Federal election— 

11 ‘‘(A) to register to vote in such election at 

12 the polling place using a form that meets the 

13 requirements under section 9(b) of the National 

14 Voter Registration Act of 1993; and 

15 ‘‘(B) to cast a vote in such election. 

16 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirements under 

17 paragraph (1) shall not apply to a State in which, 

18 under a State law in effect continuously on and after 

19 the date of the enactment of this section, there is no 

20 voter registration requirement for individuals in the 

21 State with respect to elections for Federal office. 

22 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this 

23 section, the term ‘eligible individual’ means, with respect 

24 to any election for Federal office, an individual who is oth25 erwise qualified to vote in that election. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1139 IS

1 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Each State shall be re2 quired to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) 

3 for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal of4 fice occurring in November 2016 and for any subsequent 

5 election for Federal office.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 401 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘303, and 304’’. 

10 (2) The table of contents of such Act is amend11 ed— 

12 (A) by redesignating the items relating to 

13 sections 304 and 305 as relating to sections 

14 305 and 306, respectively; and 

15 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

16 section 303 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 304. Same day registration.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 9, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Chemical Financial Corporation,*                     Midland, Michigan; to merge with Lake Michigan Financial Corporation, Holland, Michigan, and thereby indirectly acquire The Bank of Holland, Holland, Michigan, and The Bank of Northern Michigan, Petoskey, Michigan.                

      ( print page 7595)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 6, 2015.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02799 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P