alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-KSB (continued)


                                   EXHIBIT 99

                                  CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Central
Bank Corporation (the "Corporation") that the Annual Report of the Corporation
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation
as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
included in such report.



Dated:  March 28, 2003             By:  S/ DAVID A. WIDLAK
                                        ------------------
                                   David A. Widlak
                                   Chairman of the Board and CEO
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated:  March 28, 2003             By:  S/ RAY T. COLONIUS
                                        ------------------
                                   Ray T. Colonius
                                   Treasurer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
11,connina

In the abases or (kaarenl Mite I as t the opperteatt7 to ,

respond to year two letters of 15 September is ditch you emprose

deep camera over the events Shish have %SO• plowable both the MIS

and BANOS pregreas ter the plot pear at are. I oomplotely sham

pow come= wed the reheat or our lenses hes bees assumed with

the Arista& isesstaryIIt Ihs Als POW for asseessh and Deselepreat.

We believe that New or the problem to sleigh pa Mks is these tin

letters will be aolvM by earl,' Implemestatlai or ar. Nairlsors nesassarbse to the Joint Chiefs of Matt ea 'toordbeetime of Satellite

Adrenal* Specie Vehicle Operaticos, ` dated 18 laytisists 1559.

Ardis' this, eartala actions have beer takes trp this Needquartere

to bring scum or these pribbees scam dearly into tomes. ra =wad to

the aubjeet of the 1110011141elge oessiale developeent is tie MOB program, AVM hes been repeeted to provide the total ore by fiscal

year eras estimated amproval dots through to mcapletIce.

Anitt bias also bean asked to advise tiffs Needs as to

rather plumed INKS spaniels" Larches tall within the raw Batty

criteria as donned is tae are ApeimatA tat Coardlasted Posostine

Operaticsrf of the Peattle 1l 11a News dated 12 thapteeker 1919. It

the Nary agree that those Isamcb ►s cot be aide teas 654 sitarist oar

promising raw adleloy, • date sill be establiated, to enlist the trans-

!kw of the 65-1 Lame* C na= true support of the Atlas 100 program

to the SAME operational progran.

As far the geserral problem in the Pabst Arguello-ilealanharg area,

it is expected that the sew weeneat between the Air Tom aid the

Navy will assist is their resolutlas. Oa top of this declaim the

Dapertseat or Berms, her oberped Nab . Claim with the respoesibility

for deteralalsg Barrelaa waspresibilitiss in relation to the Istioaal

Raw Pro gins. This desielna is sot copeeted far at Last to maths

mod should haw as *tact es this Ratter.

Is response to your questions co the ihallog victor of both =DAS

sod SAM, the attached swear, is submitted. The Assistant thscatet•xy
•

. -

or thp Mr lase ea ilislosisia* ilsisitiPe Tat UT tessIe.

ma 

leritlaa ads Vol Sm. Oar to tie Simsvildi Ain .s. le

mem sok Us se Mimi' alb

*

tin 1001.144:' alriela Oft aim* Maio SIMMIIIIMMI tiff, UP. 31.1•:d Vi.mlisik riga...04.fis. am 48 4110f;.:..*.ts

1 Asa

themir

L. amosal. D. A. Ihirseww

Canlider, asesamh & asiedwomb Cargall

OMNI Maw $. Alv Ambeve Air Tam bre

5, D. C.

• 1.04"4. •

-SURDS E. WAY

Punt, Ili Pk Force

gm Chief of Staff

te

- • •fl'i•

tr

- • .•-•c".•.• • • • • • •,?;

z: • • s

••••:;•••

. i .

a

•
•••11;/..el.a.r. t •

• r

••• • v., d../•

r7 ••, ...46,40,

44 •.:3"ri•-...

.:

•

• •

•

-• • ••••t t.' • •-• :••••

. •

.• • • •.'7 _lot* • ••••1. • • ."AZ

•

..• •

• %S

I .r.•

• ••• • • :

•

- „. :

. -t • ' r•

r •

. •

:

.•

.

. •

. •+- • • dt

.

.

, •

.

.

•

'swan liestammea (11111)

lifliersist

Moirlei

.3110.4 .04

.16140 334 • 

atamajogamess

rya Ow)

IMO

Oblintlasij

&dada la norm iklas

aims lisedisonia

. • • • • 1•••%

. I

•

*•0

• •

••••••, •••• •-•-•••
ASSIGNMENT

THIS AGREEMENT, made on the day of February, 2001, between:

         Mark Rice located at                 ("ASSIGNOR")

                                       and

         Robert Esposito located at           ("ASSIGNEE")

                                    RECITALS:

A. ASSIGNOR presently is the purchaser of shares of Hypermedia Communications
Inc. pursuant to the Private Stock and Debt Purchase Agreement ("Agreement")
dated February 9, 2001 for the purchase of 2,144,822 issued and outstanding
common shares and 8,483,391 issued and outstanding preferred shares as well
approximately $7,914,192 in debt instruments. B. ASSIGNOR desires to assign to
ASSIGNEE such all of the interest in the shares and purchaser of the debt under
the Agreement in consideration for ASSIGNEE paying the purchase price of $76,173
under the Agreement.

         THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES AND THE MUTUAL AGREEMENTS
HEREINAFTER SET FORTH BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     1.0 ASSIGNMENT. ASSIGNOR AGREES TO ASSIGN ALL OF ITS RIGHTS, TITLE AND
INTEREST IN ITS INTEREST IN THE AGREEMENT. IN CONSIDERATION THEREOF, ASSIGNEE
shall fund the full amount of $76,173 under the terms of the Agreement.

     2.0 AMENDMENTS. No amendments or additions to this Agreement shall be
binding unless in writing, signed by both parties, except as herein otherwise
provided.

     3.0 APPLICABLE LAW. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects,
whether as to validity, construction, capacity, performance or
otherwise, by the laws of the State of Florida.

<PAGE>

     4.0 SEVERABILITY. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in
this Agreement shall not in any way affect the validity or enforceability of any
other provision and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such
invalid or unenforceable provision had never been in the Agreement.

     5.0 NOTICES. Any and all notices required hereunder shall be deemed
delivered personally or if mailed by registered or certified mail tot he partes
at the addresses mentioned above, or at such other address or addresses as
either party may hereinafter designate in writing to the other.

     6.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between
the parties and supersedes and replaces any and all agreements,
written or oral, made at any time between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written. WITNESS:

                                            /s/ Mark Rice
-----------------------              --------------------------------
                                                MARK RICE

WITNESS:

                                            /s/ Robert Esposito
-----------------------              --------------------------------
                                                ROBERT ESPOSITO

<PAGE>
.."."44111110,11..

•

ZCZCXQA617EIA4141QA935. •

.—: • PP RUXQAA • •

DE RUEIWC #3340 30312:4 .

ZNY XXXXX BBB ZNM •

P 291239Z

041111, •

1/417APW"V . • •

291230Z OCT 76 SPECIAL DESIGNEES

CIS

TO: PRIOR

HANDLE V CHANNELS ONLY

FOR SS-5, A ON: COL. HOFMANN

FROM: L. C. DIRKS

SU3JECT: TERLY REPORT TO IOB

REFEREN 1592

1. THE F OWING IS A SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE PRECEDING

FOUR MONTHS, SUPPORTING EXECUTIVE ORDER 11905.

PROGRAM B HAS. DISSEMINATED E.O. 11995 AND ANNEX D OF

USSID 13 TO ALL OFFICE ,OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COD&E) •

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL. THE OFFICE OF ELI OPIES

OF E.O. 35 ANNEX D, USSID 13 TO THE

OD&E HAS DISSEMINATED IN-HOUSE A MEMORANDUM COVERING

IMPLEMENTATION OF E.O. 11935 AS IT-RELATES TO ALL RD&E

ACTIVITIES.

C.THERE HAVE 3EEN DISCUSSIONS WITHIN OD&E AT (CROUP .

DIRECTOR LEVEL ON THE LEGALITIES A'D'D INTERPRETATIONS OF E.O.

PAGE 612 .

J

AN E.O. 11905 I1PLEMENTATION PLAN a = TO -

ALL PROGRAM 3 RD&E ZLENErTS CONCERNED WIT

ACTIVITIES. • • CONTRACTORS HAVE 3EEP APPROPRIATELY BRIEFED ON HE - • re = N OF E.O. 11935. THE 0 • :

— — A Y W LL

USiD IN A HIC ACE IT IN VIOLATION OF E.0 •H::.:

119 ' :•

. :

2. C_ CA : :.

I HEREBY CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND , ..

3ELIEF, THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO 3REACHES OF E.O. 11905.

I FURTHER CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF:NY KNOWLEDGE AND .,

3ELIEF, THAT DOMESTIC SIGINT R&D AND CALIBRATION TESTING HAVE •

3EEN CONDUCTED WITHIN THE EXCEPTION CATEGORIES OF UUSSID 18, ••

ANNEX Do PARAGRAPH 1.3, AND THAT ANY KNOWN DATA INADVERTENTLY

COLLECTED HAS NOT 3EEN EXPLOITED IN ANY MANNER, AND THAT SUCH •

DATA HAS 3EEN OR WILL 3E DESTROYED AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY

E-2 INPDET•

. —

3T

# 03 4 3
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1321 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1321

To expand benefits to the families of public safety officers who suffer 
   fatal climate-related injuries sustained in the line of duty and 
                    proximately resulting in death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2015

   Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. Portman, Ms. Ayotte, and Mr. Peters) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand benefits to the families of public safety officers who suffer 
   fatal climate-related injuries sustained in the line of duty and 
                    proximately resulting in death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Fallen Officers Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS FOR FAMILIES OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS WHO SUFFER 
              FATAL CLIMATE-RELATED INJURIES.

    Section 1201 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``or climate-related 
        injury (as defined in subsection (l))'' after ``personal 
        injury'';
            (2) in subsection (k)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                striking ``or vascular rupture'' and inserting 
                ``vascular rupture, or climate-related injury'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``exposure to 
                extreme environmental conditions,'' after ``disaster 
                relief,'';
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or vascular 
                rupture'' and inserting ``vascular rupture, or climate-
                related injury'';
                    (D) in paragraph (3), by striking ``or vascular 
                rupture'' and inserting ``vascular rupture, or climate-
                related injury''; and
                    (E) in the flush text following paragraph (3), by 
                striking ``or vascular rupture'' and inserting 
                ``vascular rupture, or climate-related injury''; and
            (3) by amending subsection (l) to read as follows:
    ``(l) For purposes of subsection (k)--
            ``(1) the term `climate-related injury' means an injury 
        that is caused by an environmental condition experienced by an 
        officer, including hypothermia, heatstroke, and hyperthermia; 
        and
            ``(2) the term `nonroutine stressful or strenuous physical' 
        excludes actions of a clerical, administrative, or nonmanual 
        nature.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Avery *v.*Brunce.

*Per curiam*

The rule is where an injunction hath been obtained, arid dissolved on hearing the answer of the De=-fendant,, and the Plaintiff retains the bill, if betakes no steps towards preparing his cause for hearing, in two terms after, the bill shall be dismissed for Want *of prosecution.*In the present case, two terms have interve- ' ned since the dissolution of the injunction, and the Complainant hath taken no step.s by referring the cause, taking depositions or otherwise, and therefore must be dis; missed. It Was dismissed accordingly.

Note, *Vide Anonymous, ante*162. *Anonymous, post*451. *Dawson v-2*Ha*y.*296,
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10806

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Lynnette Marie Jacobs, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:22-CR-6-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lynnette Marie Jacobs has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Jacobs has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10806 Document: 00516684286 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2023
No. 22-10806

2

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10806 Document: 00516684286 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2023
EXHIBIT
32(b)





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the three
month period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc.,
certify that based on my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 5, 2009
              /s/ Gary C. KaufmanGary
      C. Kaufman
*November 11, 1930.*

#### Jansen, Respondent, vs. Jansen, Appellant.

For the appellant: *F. Carney Nelligan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Argued and submitted October 20, 1982,

affirmed in part and reversed in part October 5, 1983

#### PILCHER, *Petitioner, v.*WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR OF OREGON, *Respondent.*

(690; CA A23458)

669 P2d 1197

Clark & Clark, Redmond, filed the brief for petitioner.

Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Daryl Dodson Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

BUTTLER, P.J.

*737BUTTLER, P. J.

Petitioner appeals from a decision by the Water Resources Director of Oregon (Director) that suspended his water well contractor’s license and drill machine operator’s license for a period of 60 days and ordered petitioner’s bonding company to assume responsibility to repair an improperly constructed well.

Petitioner contends that the Director erred when he admitted in evidence an Oregon Highway Division laboratory report. The standard for admissibility of evidence is provided in ORS 183.450(1):

> “Irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded * * *. All other evidence of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in conduct of their serious affairs shall be admissible. * * *”

The report of the laboratory was not irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious. The purpose of the laboratory analysis was to determine what material could be found in the sample of the well-casing seal. Petitioner’s objections here are relevant to the weight given to the report, but do not render it inadmissible. The Director did not err in admitting it.

Petitioner also contends that the suspension order was not supported by substantial evidence. He does not contend that the findings are not supported; they are. Further, those findings support the Director’s conclusions of law and the conclusions support the order suspending petitioner’s licenses. We affirm that portion of the order.

In a supplemental memorandum submitted at the request of the court at oral argument, the Director concedes that he did not have the authority to issue an order binding the bonding company in a suspension-revocation administrative proceeding to which that company was not a party. ORS 537.753(2) gives any person injured by a failure of a licensee to comply with the provisions of the bond a right of action against the bonding company. We agree with the concession and reverse that portion of the order directing petitioner’s bonding company, a non-party, to assume responsibility for the improperly constructed well.

Affirmed as to suspension of license; reversed as to responsibility of bonding company.
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-17-1999 

# S h a w v . D al l a s C o w

b o ys

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ocke t 98-1629

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" S h a w v . D al l as C o w

bo ys " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s
. P ape r 130. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/130

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 98-1629 & 98-1887

CHARLES SHAW; BRET D. SCHWARTZ; STEVE PROMISLO, IND IVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUAT ED

v.

DALLAS COWBOYS FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD.; NEW ENGLAND PAT RIOTS FOOTBALL CLUB;NEW YORK GIANTS FOOTBALL, INC.; PHILADELPHIA E AGLES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;SAN FRANCISCO FORTY-NINERS, LT D.; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, Appellants

The following modifications have been made to t he Court's Opinion issued on April 9, 1999, to the above-entit led appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opi nion:

1. Page 1: insert "Before: Honorab le Robert S. Gawthrop, III" under (D.C. Civ. No. 97-cv-05184)
2. Page 5, Section I, line 16: add hypen between the words "or" and "nothing" footnote 4, line 4: d elete ", 31 S.Ct. 502, 55 L.Ed. 619"
3. Page 7, footnote 8, line 1: del ete ", 102 S.Ct. 3002, 73 L.Ed.2d 647"
4. Page 9, footnote 13, line 2: de lete "113 S.Ct. 409, 121 L.Ed.2d. 334"

Very truly yours,

/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk

Dated: May 14, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

d1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

142939(174) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142939 

 COA: 291554 

Jackson CC: 08-004100-FH 

ANDREW LYNN BREEDING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 25, 2011 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. The Court’s July 25, 2011 order disposed of all the issues raised in 

the defendant’s application, including the issues labeled “second application for leave to 

appeal” and “third application for leave to appeal.”
can't°

-TOP-3EC1ET- COPY

PACE 7.'"''OF PAGES

Ob7IMIUTION

SAES! L.! : 

r-T

.74,1

7- %. ,2,4

.•••

3406-:

0-NATIONALRECONNAISSANCEOFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

1104111111111111

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 21 October 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR GENERAL GEORGE J. KEEGAN, JR., AF/IN

SUBJECT: Relocation of the Evaluation and Photo R&D Functions

of the AFSPPF

I have reviewed your 15 July 1974 letter regarding the

placement of the evaluation and photo R&D functions of . the

AFSPPF.

Extensive studies of both functions were conducted by

all NRO participants. As a result, due to its uniqueness

to the entire program, the evaluation function will be transferred to NPIC. The photo R&D function will be mo the

Wash

at If appropriate, specific functions may also be

p1: neral Bradburn (Program A) at RAFSP. The direction and management of tasking has been delegated to the NRO

Configuration Change Board (CCB), which has the overall

responsibility for ground system R&D.

For the first time, the NRO will have collocated photo

and exploitation R&D. Both the evaluation and photo R&D

functions will continue to be manned by Air Force personnel

and thus will continue to strengthen the mutually beneficial

Air Force participation in the National Reconnaissance Program

(NRP).

cc: AF/CC

ti

•

CIARERNED 11Arf POOR

GENERAL OP

EXECUTIVE CAMEGORY 02 occtassorr OM MAP

set le • /21••••~TI,VIr-.....mi. e- . • • .• " . r