alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RICHARD H. CAMFBW, 

Major, USAF 

SAF-SLM 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 

dt; 

10 May 1967 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: MOL Planetary Observations Program Directive 

The attached Program Office Directive was prepared in order 

to initiate the necessary program activity that would produce a 

planetary observation capability with MOL. Although the directive 

was signed by General Evans, its release was withheld pending 

resolution of certain issues and SPO studies. 

Events subsequent to the signing of the directive make the 

directive unnecessary. SPO studies have been accomplished and 

reported to the Program Office which answer the several questions 

that were relevant to the withholding of the directive. Correspondence 

to the SPO has been prepared for the Vice Director's signature which 

will in effect create the same results as the directive would have 

done. 

Atch 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY T4d9-1372-‘72404. 
LEWIS S. NO 

COLONEL, USAF 

ar~7.2 -67 

cAt 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASH INGTON 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

8 March 1967 

MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL EVANS 

SUBJECT: MOL Planetary Observations Program Directive 

Attached for your signature is proposed Program Office 

Directive 67-6, "MOL Planetary Observations." This directive 

is in accordance with your most recent Memorandum to Dr. Flax 

(9 February 1967), and your 21 February 1967 letter to 

Colonel Heran on this subject (copies attached). 

The proposed directive has been coordinated with all 

divisions of the MOL Program Office, and with Lt Colonel( Skantze 

of the Systems Office. The direct ve has • yet been cbordinated 

with Mr. Kirk nor Dr. Flax. 

3 Atch 

a/s 

,.........-.....—.... 

[

EXCLUDED 7ROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING; 

DOD DIR 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

DORIAN Page 1 of 1 page 

Copy 1 of 4 copies 

SAF-SL BYE BREFINAL
.

!r

trnsgi Functions: NRO 63 5371

Ah-•.

4'1 5

. '4, soot:

0

"Pa

1

.44° %fiu.7 t• THE moat Of CINfltAi. 11415.1101INCE I

•

WAININGICIN 111.1.

WAS:was I

ti

8 November 1963

-•-

The Honorable Roswell L. Gilpatric

Deputy Secretary of Defense

Washington. 25, D. C.

Dear Roe:

..r

This fol

•

 lows up on our meeti

▪

 ng of 2.2 October which was bald

to discuss the NRO budget. At this meeting we discussed the probe:: lets of bow to insure that the NRP is fully responsive to intelligence

requirements. I have Also discussed this problem at considerable

length on two occasions with De. Eugene Fubini.

•

There is,. I believe, agreement that the NRO would be strength..

tamed by the active participation of additional officers with CIA

experience in various capacities. General Carter and Dr. Wheelon

are working with Dr. Fubini and Dr. McMillan to determine assign..

meats appropriate for such officers. •

•

In this connection, our agreement concerning the management

of the NRP provides for the designation Of appropriate officials of

the office of the Secretary of Defense and CIA to examine and monitor

on their behalf the activities of the NRO. I have designated Dr.. Wheelon

to act in this capacity. I am sure that he will work closely and

effectively with Dr. Pubini who, I tinderstand, is performing this •

function on behalf of your office.

We are also agreed, as I understand it, that the procedures

under which the Secretary of Defense and I afford policy guidance to

the NRO would be greatly improved by regularly scheduled meetings

to be attended by appropriate senior officials ef DOD, CIA and NRO.

11, .00.1 0,n•

V

ir 

.•

4117 

• P 4.

f;

„.o/e .

•

L ; / "

'

=CIS= 11 :WAT.F.: •

RE.M.D:tC: V:3 Up 5::.:3.20

WES COT OPLY t

X' /7.2

••n•••••••n••••••n•n•nnn• ••nn•n•••••nn1111
ex 3

•

. •

I plan personally to participate in such meetings and hope that

you will also find it possible to attend. The meetings would provide

is opportunity for regular, periodic review and discussion of the

policy aspects of all current programs and activities of the NRO and

. for policy review and approval of all plans and proposals for future

programs and operations.

Sincerely,

SI=

John A. McCane

Director

. ...-...- .

.:
# C_2005087EN.01000101.xml

| 9.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 April 2005

(2005/C 87/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2819 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4489 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6859 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1597 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5505 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,72 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,583 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,945 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,111 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 447 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,72 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,825 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7335 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6717 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5749 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9979 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7976 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1288 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 301,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9483 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6096 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,402 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 178,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8711 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,985 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,725 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,896 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2819

JPY

Japanese yen

139,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4489

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6859

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1597

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5505

ISK

Iceland króna

78,72

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,583

CZK

Czech koruna

29,945

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,111

ROL

Romanian leu

36 447

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,72

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,825

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7335

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6717

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5749

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9979

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7976

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1288

KRW

South Korean won

1 301,38

ZAR

South African rand

7,9483

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6096

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,402

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 178,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8711

PHP

Philippine peso

69,985

RUB

Russian rouble

35,725

THB

Thai baht

50,896

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
- . (llrtl'Itl:L 

Approved for !;"~~~~~~! 8/11/16 C05115157 

TRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 

MEMORANDUM FOR: BY EMAN Security Officer s 

BYEMAN Control Officers 

SSC- 0236-71 

8 September 1971 

SUBJECT Termination of Project TAG BOARD 

1. The Special Security Center has been advised that 

Project TAGBOARD has been terminated, effective 15 July 1971. 

Documents uniquely controlled as TAGBOARD are to be destroyed 

immediately or retired to appropriate repositories designated by 

BCOs. Documents controlled under one or more BYEMAN compartments in addition to TAGBOARD will have TAGBOARD 

infon-nation deleted and TAGBOARD controls removed. 

2. It is requested that BCOs and BSOs commence debriefing holders of TAGBOARD approvals, forwarding debriefing 

statements (attached), when completed, to the Compartmented 

Information Branch, CLA..i J Administrative debriefing 

is authorized only in those instances were the individual is not 

readily available in terms of distance, time, or expense required 

to reach him. Effective irrnnediately, TAG BOARD access 

approvals will no longer be certified to r eque stor s. 

3. Documents of historical value, where deletion of 

TAGBOARD information cannot be accomplished, will be made 

available to those persons having a "must knowll requirement, 

an IDEALIST or STUDY 50006 access approval, and appropriate 

acce s s approval for po s sible other compartmented information 

contained in the document concerned. 

Special Security Center 

Attachrnents: 

Tennination Secrecy Agreements
IU? SLUal

IV 14

-1S1 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASH:N3TZN, D.c. 111011111Wlail1

OFF;CE OP.ME :4R.W.ToR

i/A)e. 4 9

NEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Studies of Reconnaissance Projects

We have agreed to conduct jointly'several studies

relating to reconnaissance problems and projects. These

studies are to address the following questions:

What is the value of systems with higher resolution than our present capabilities? This study has.been

completed under the direction•of a study group chaired.by

Dr. Ling. •

What technological capabilities exist or may

reasonably be expected in the near future to permit the

development of real-time transmission of imagery? What are

the comparative merits of competing technologies toyard

achieving this capability? What performance milestones

should we expect in the next 18 months? This study has been

established under Dr. Fubini and a report is expected in the

spring of 1970.

3. What are the need, value, risks, and command

and control problems associated with vulnerable peripheral

SIGINT collection systems and what alternatives exist? This

study is being conducted by Dr. Dinneen and will probably be

completed by the end of this year.

the Ossibilities for developing an

how would it interface with other

s question will be address

art hensive Defense Science Board study'

his report should be completed in es i

••osayt •s.

BYR1P11 TO? SECRET 60.,44•, if slim iliMa4114 /434 •d3•031+3

BOO 1••10.•( st41 •• 11n..1,.••0.
BYEUI -TOMEGRE4-

Ce.•► 3. U•og

WO emit- •S 1:32 11 2222 ,ar 41•0*.•

qIf __..taoti.

.at(227k82221

IU? StUal

11;1-,

L

 sl

LI) iii;•

112

5. How should we allocate resources among

satellite-borne, airborne, and surface-based ELINT collection systems? We are establishing a study group now and

formulating detailed terms of reference.

We agree that these questions are important and that

the intelligence community can benefit by the results of

these studies. The NRO and DOME staffs will cooperate

in conducting the studies. The results of the studies will

be used by both organizations in accordance with their

respective responsibilities and authority.

111111111111

em..231.t.m E -13363-6
#### Cuyahoga County Bar Association *v.*Vitullo.

[Cite as *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vitullo*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 549.]

(No. 99-806

Submitted June 9, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*551
      *Michael M. Courtney*and *Thomas E. Kocovsky,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. Given respondent’s pattern of misconduct and misappropriation of client funds and property, and the lack of mitigating evidence, I would permanently disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio.
( 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C051 01947 

Dr .. Flax/af/76990/27 :"lar 67 

I h3V'.;l read the 

foX' s,ntel1ite pr(JEP:,:;n.n5 "rtlhieh yc~! 

letter of March 17, 1967. As ycu 

in. complete agreemen-t with the 

your ar~r}t"oach. I' .filla 

the .1idditional detellz 

in tl~e lat~·8t 'pspcr" 

I coosider tl1at. ycu 

h<1ve done an outst.f'!l!dil1.g ----------t.his--:tru::;-enti va stru~-t:y~e~< Lli;}£'---Z:{,.2.1 

a completely r,atioMl:; 

have obtained, highly effective 

Your success l~'t1 'th tljis te'c.rLTticlJO: ... 

?artial introduction into 1".;;.1;: l?ot'c~ 

O"utsida s..tJi' .... Sp $ and I t thnt» in 

we vIill £OCt'J'6 :6 .. n:tl1er to':qZtJ;'d 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14000783010 < 

" 

cc: §AFRD CI-IRON 

/ SP,FRD HOLD 

i--SL\FPJ) DEPUTY 

Sp2Ju\E 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C051 01947 

[
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 512, 

610, AND 612 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA

RULES OF JUVENILE COURT

PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 737

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2017, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile 

Court Procedural Rules Committee, the proposal having been published for public 

comment at 46 Pa.B. 3944 (July 23, 2016): 

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rules 512, 610, and 612 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure 

are amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective on October 1, 2017.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
cLASsIFica:
OF REFEREN

‘SPECIAL. INSTRUCTIONG|

ssp. 20

=| TO PLAGE THE

JAN INCLINATION” °
INDICATED
TRACK
PARAMETERS
AGTUAL »

109

maa _ 2 foeh Te

 Fetanatune? 0.

od ee
E | TYPED (or staiped) NAME AND TITLE
~ canned AT. 3 YEAR DNTRITAy
; novi “ASTER 12 YEARS:
“DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10



Lees ware

SHC) REA IS
# BEVERIDGE~

&DIAMONDpcT

Karen M. Hansen 1350 I Street, N.W.

Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005-3311 Direct: (202) 789-6056 Fax: (202) 789-6190 khansen@bdlaw.com
January 14,2010

Via Electronic Mail

Debra Edwards, Ph.D. Director Office of Pesticide Programs (7501P) 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency One Potomac Yard 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Room S-12622 Arlington, Virginia 22202 Joan Harrigan-Farrelly Director, Antimicrobials Division Office of Pesticide Programs 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 7510P Washington, D.C. 20460

Mr. Philip J. Ross U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of General Counsel Pesticides and Toxic Substances Law Office Ariel Rios North 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: EPA Consideration ofNalcp's Two Biocides

Dear Dr. Edwards, Mr. Ross and Ms. Harrigan-Farrelly:

We are writing in response to Nalco's letters dated January 8 and January 12,2010. Any additional delay of the kind advocated by Nalco is entirely unwarranted, as the issues raised by the parties have been under advisement by EPA for a considerable time. Inthis regard, we appreciate your recent confirmation of a meeting among the parties and EPA on February 16, 2010.

FIFRA unambiguously requires the registration of pesticides prior to their sale or distribution, and EPA's primary objective here should be to prohibit sales of umegistered pesticidal products. Nalco' s desire for additional input from a wide range of industries and users that it alleges "may" be affected by EPA's decision on its two biocide products should under no

Washington, D.C. Maryland New York Massachusetts New Jersey Texas California
FOAM 

12-6"1 ;Z820 

, .' NRO APPROVED FO~ RE~EASE CLASSIFIED MESSAGE 

o DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 JULY 2. 12 SIEll' 

FIL.E.INFO (When Filled In) 

REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED I 0 ff.B 69 lZ 

ACTION 1 I)I)~ 6 1)"'1" 11 COR 

2 7 i)i)/Ui)P 12 7ILE 

3 --em 8 13 D/OS 

4 9 AaAX ax 14 

5 i)&T 1~ 15 

IN 67137 

T Q P & & & R I T TALENT KEYHOLE 182819Z FEB 69 CITE 

PRIORITYQUILL, CORONA, DORIAN, GAMBIT, HEXAGON 

SECUR 

" 

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, THE USE OF THE CODEWORD QUILL AS - A SECURITY PROJECT INDICATOR UNDER THE BYEMAN SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEM WILL BE DISCONTINUED. THE SATELLITE RADAR - - FEASIBILITY DEMONSTRATION CONDUCTED AS PROJECT QUILL WILL 

HENCEFORTH BE IDENTIFIED AS NRO STUDY 

THOSE MATERIALS RELATED TO PRLJECT QUILL, PRESENTLY 

IN POSSESSION OF VARIOUS BYEMAN CONTROL CENTERS, WILL BE 

RESTRICTED ON A MUST KNOW BASIS TO INDIVIDUALS APPROVED FOR 

ACCESS TO EITHER CQRONA, DORIAN, GAMBIT, OR HEXAGON. THESE ........---. -----...: " ... . 

• 

Z.tz 

16 

17 

~8 

19 

2$1 

MATERIALS WILL CONTINUE TO BE MAINTAINED IN THE BYEMAN SECURITY .... > 

CONTROL SYSTEM ALTHOUGH APPROVAL FOR QUILLACCESS 

~ 

WILL NO 

LONGER BE REQUIRED OR BILLETED. ----- THE IMAGERY PRODUCED DURING THE QUILL FEASIBILITY 

DEMONSTRATION (WHICH WAS LIMITED TO US ZONE OF INTERIOR) ... IS RELEASABLE ON A -MUST KNOW- TO INDIVIDUALS HAVING ACCESS ~ 

TO EITHER TALENT-KEYHOLE, OR BYEMAN PROJECTS CORONA, DORIAN . 

GA"BIT,.OR HEXAGON. TALENT-KEYHOLE PERSONNEL MAY HAVE ACCESS ..... 

TO SELECT ENGINEERING DATA UPON VALID REQUEST. -MUST KNOW-

(44) 

,r 
o 

FORM 

12_61. 2820 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

D~CLASSIFIED BY: CIIART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 JULY 20 12 

FILE INFO 

CLASSIFIED MESSAGE 

5EEIET 

(When Filled In) 

REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 

ACTION I 6 11 

2 7 12 

3 8 13 

4 9 14 

5 1~ 15 

/AGE TWO , e , ! e eft! , TALENT KEYHOLE 

DETERMINATIONS WILL BE MADE BY THE SIO. 

. - ~ ALL QUILL MATERIALS IN cUStODY OF BCO'S WILL HAVE THE· 

16 

17 

18 

19 

~ 

QUILL COMPARTMENT DELETED AND BE MARKED N~O "STUDY IIIIII~ 

MATERIALS IN THE TALENT-KEYHOLE OR BYEMAN SYSTEM WILL USE 

THE TERM "RADAR FEASIBILITY STUDY" IN LIEU OF "PROJECT QUILL" 

IN CONTEXTUAL MATTERS. 

IMMEDIATE ACTION WILL BE TAKEN TO DEBRIEF ALL PERSONNEL 

CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED QUILL ACCESS. 

T g P i i 8 R & T 

BT 

(441
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1147 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1147

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the ``J. Waties 
                       Waring Judicial Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Scott) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the ``J. Waties 
                       Waring Judicial Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. J. WATIES WARING FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``J. Waties Waring Judicial Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``J. Waties Waring Judicial Center''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2409

MORRIS WILSON CRABTREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BHK OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-45-D)

Submitted: December 31, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Wilson Crabtree, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh Morrison,

WILLIAM M. BENNETT, JR. & ASSOCIATES, Halifax, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Morris Wilson Crabtree appeals the district court's order

granting summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crabtree v. BHK of

America, No. CA-95-45-D (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 14-6256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

HOPETON FRANK GOODEN, a/k/a Richard Doleson, a/k/a Michael 

Frank Burke, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00313-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00097-FL) 

Submitted: June 23, 2014 Decided: June 26, 2014 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Hopeton Frank Gooden, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, Shailika 

K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Certiorari granted by Supreme Court, June 30, 2015 

Vacated and Remanded by Supreme Court, June 30, 2015
2

PER CURIAM:

Hopeton Frank Gooden seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

and its order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The 

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gooden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED