alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

 
                                  DYNAMEX INC.
 
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        YEAR ENDED JULY 31
                                                                   ----------------------------
                                                                    1994       1995       1996
                                                                   -------    -------    ------
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)................................................  $(1,065)   $(1,625)   $  876
                                                                   =======    =======     =====
Weighted average common shares outstanding.......................      528        855     2,543
Common share equivalents related to options and warrants.........    1,163      1,163     1,189
                                                                   -------    -------     -----
Common share and common share equivalents........................    1,691      2,018     3,732
                                                                   =======    =======     =====
Common stock price used under treasury stock method..............  $  8.00    $  8.00    $ 8.00
                                                                   =======    =======     =====
Net income (loss) per common share...............................  $ (0.63)   $ (0.81)   $ 0.23
                                                                   =======    =======     =====
</TABLE>
 
     The net income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period, adjusted as follows: The
Common Stock, warrants and options which were issued within one year prior to
the initial public offering, have been included in the calculation of common
stock equivalent shares outstanding (using the treasury stock method for options
and warrants) as if they were outstanding since the Company's inception in
accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Warrants
and options issued prior to the aforementioned twelve-month period have been
excluded from the calculation of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
because their effect is anti-dilutive.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

INFINITE LEGACY INVESTMENTS LIMITED, a Hong Kong p rivate l imited c ompany , Appellant,

v.

CBIZ ACCOUNTING, TAX AND ADVISORY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1142

[ May 27, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jaime R. Goodman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 5 0

- 2017

- CA

009539

- XXXX

- MB

.

Robert Rossano of the Law Offices of Robert Rossano, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

H. Steven Vogel and Alan J. Perlman of Dickinson Wright PLLC, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN , JJ., and R OBINSON , M ICHAEL A. , Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2005019EN.01003203.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/32

---

Action for failure to act brought on 18 November 2004 by Mediocurso – Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular S.A. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-451/04)

(2005/C 19/68)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 November 2004 by Mediocurso – Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular S.A., established in Lisbon (Portugal), represented by Carlos Botelho Moniz and Eduardo Maia Cadete, lawyers, with an address for service in Lisbon.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Commission, by failing to comply with Article 233 EC, was in breach of its duty to implement the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 21 September 2000 in Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission, by failing to comply with Article 233 EC, was in breach of its duty to implement the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 21 September 2000 in Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso v Commission;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant founds its claim on the Commission's alleged failure to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 September 2000 in Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso v Commission.

More than 50 months have passed since the judgment was delivered and the Commission has not taken the measures which implementation of the judgment require it to take, namely taking a decision on the applicant's requests for payment of outstanding balances.

Despite having been formally requested to act, by letter from the applicant dated 19 July 2004, the Commission merely responded, by letter of 31 August 2004, that its services would be taking new decisions as soon as possible. In the applicant's submission, that response is a purely interim communication and does not amount to a measure implementing the abovementioned judgment.

Thus, as provided for in Article 232 EC, the Commission has unlawfully failed to act and in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 232 EC the Court of Justice may establish the infringement.

---
111111"181 DEPARTMENT OF THE MR FORCE Illetrairarill

WADONWVIDIN •

OFFICE OF THE um= ECCACTAHT 30 December 1969

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Discussion with Secretary Packard, 30 December 69

Classified Subiects:

I described thillilleview which we had conducted with

BOB and how I felt d served a good purpose in getting

them off our backs. He thought that the thing had been well

handled.

On the Fubini Panel, he felt that it would be very

satisfactory for them to slip their report to February or

March. I told him that I would be willing for them to do

that and in fact, I would be very happy if they slipped it

to April or May but that I wasn't sure that some other members

of ExCom might not insist on getting a report out sooner.

Specifically, they might ask us to call an ExCom meeting at

which time we could explore what progress had been made, which

could lead to an early decision on whether to speed up the

read-out system. He says he does not think there would be

any pressure from the other ExCom members and that we should

go ahead and do the job the way we think is best.

With respect to the combining of the CIA and SAC U-2

fleets, he said that Dick Helms had made a pitch to the President

to keep the CIA fleet and was successful. However Packard said

that as far as he is concerned it is a continuing issue and that

we should go ahead and prepare our study of how to conduct the

combination because he thinks it is very likely to happen in

the not too distant future.

Or let/ ••

John L. McLucas

a
i, 

I I, 

I 

r 

f 

r ;i 

I 

I 

r 

t' 

f 

t 

t 

I 

, , 

,~' • 

" 

, -"" ", 

,,' -_ ........ -·-······'f4'Ooob·984Q[i~' -"""111. III lUI 

. i' 

" 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07395 /2 

, ',.' \ . 

MLHORANDUM FOR I'll". ilo:t'In;m F'oll<'\Ck, D:Lpcctor" 

International Scientific & TechnoloRical 

.Affail's. Department of ~1tutc. . 

Subject: Soviet {lttitudo tOvliird f.Wl"'th rosourcen survey 

by oatallite 

r had occaoion to apPciu' on i:1 pnncl progl'i.1'/f1 ilt th(~ 

UnlvorSl · . t yo' f!.1 tV' .. " ] . t1 . " I \ I ,yes - 11'f.l"lnlil Cd,,' .. ,1.Cl" '-,U.G HOnr( \))':11 r0'f' 

Andr'oov, Counsolor' to the SoviGt fLint.d.on to the U~I. \10 

Hore flsked by the (\IHl5.,:mc,,~ Vlh(~thor intornational political 

di .f'ficul ties mir,ht be oxpccted in connection vJi th earth 

re80urces survey stl.tol1it,,~u. I \-Ili)D I'wkndto l'or.~rond first 

nnd did so alonE {~fJtabl1.'Jhod linen, viz: Tho U::JC 0 r space 

for peaceful pUr'1'OSG8 h <".1. [1 boon H~11 o~~t,J.blish(ld .in UrI 

resolutiono and in tho Outer SImco Treaty, and lookinG at 

the earth from spnce hilS been established in practice 

throu8h US nndSovict mctcoroloric0l satellite and manned 

flirht pl'oj1rams over nettl:'l y r.1 decade Clnd Hi thout cllr1.11onr,c. 

I was then asked to whnt extent thin mi r:ht (Jl;:zpend on tho 

resolution of imaring devic~G in satellites. I replied 

that the principIa was valid without regard to resolution. 

I then turned to Andrccv and nnkcd if he diGi'lr;rccd. lIe 

ntated that the pODition wnG a correct one wi'th which the 

Soviet Union fully unread {jnd til'].t ho could (we no problem 

. in 'oonneation with el:u'th t1CGourccs survey by satellite. ' 

Arnold W. Fr'utkin 

cc: 

Ambassador Charles E. Boh10n 

Mr. Robart F. Packard 

bee: 

A/Hr. Webb 

M/Dr. Newell 

ADA/Mr. Shapley~ __ *~ 

SA/Mr. Jaffe .' 

AWF:dcg/I, Chron, 

File: ERS + 10 

:. i 

, ,. 

i :1 i 

! 

I 

I 

~. 

{ f 

I '. I 

i 

! 

I 

~. 

! 

r 

rI, 

t 

I 

( 

-

I~,==~-------=----------------------------------------------------------------------~, 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07395
TO 

FROM 

Oll'l«:>H.\L l"O.:M HO. 10 

MA.Y 1H2 IDITI~ 

Cl:JA ,,. .... f"-1 c,m H)l-fL& 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

Memorandum 

NR0 Asst. £or Securitv 

HANDLE 

BYEMAN-COMINT 

CONTROL SYSTE'.MS J01NTCV 

DATE: 17 January 1969 

BYE-18053-69 

Copy _L 0£ ~ Copies 

SUBJECT: BYEMAN Industrial Security Handling 0£ COf'.UNT J'VIaterials 

In reference to your memorandum 0£ 3 January 69, it is 

not clear how the 6 September 62 USIB document attached thereto 

on data collected by the :first ELINT satellite, POPPY, solves 

the problem addressed by Dr. Flax in his letter to General 

Carter 12 August 68 ( originally raised in NSA memorandU111 

24 January 66). That problem is of assuring e:f'£ective 

security procedures at BYEMAN industrial .facilities. This has 

come up with the advent of COl>UNT satellites and the need is 

to define what materials handled by the contractors are ·to 

be classified CO!viINT. Obviously all documents, tapes and 

intelligence materials already under C0MINT control will 

remain so until downgraded. It was suggti!sted in our dra£t 

21 October 68 that all contractor facilities/personnel 

utilizing these COMINT controlled materials and any documents/ 

equipment developed :from them which reveals the same sensitive 

sources/targets/success which the C0MI~T materials themselves 

reveal must also be controlled by existing COJ\UNT security 

protection procedures. To do otherwise would destroy the 

effectiveness 0£ this security system. Thus we have to go 

beyond your proposal and develop the guidelines requested by 

our principals in the correspondence cited above. We are 

available to assist you in this work. 

Director's Advisory Group 

National Security Agency 

Page_],_ of _l_ Pages 

BYEMAN C0MINT CONTROL SYSTEM 0~LY 

p 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-COMINT 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTI..Y 

Buy U,S, Savings Bonds Regu!a,-ly on the Payroll Savings Plan _,,,,.. 901 17 D/J7 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114252
#### Solomon Walker’s Administrators *v.*Matthew Hawkins.

Detinue for negroes, brought against the intestate in his life time ; upon whose death, the Defendants, his representatives, were called in and made parties; and there was a verdict against them, subject to the opinion of the court upon this question, whether an action of detinue will lie against executors, for the detainer of their intestate, and now *Gen. Davie*for the Defendant, moved for leave to enter upon the argument, saying he had prepared himself for it.

*Per'curiam*

This point has been already decided in the negative, upon this circuit, in the case of v. *Hughes’s*administrators, and formerly at Edenton. — - So t'-e judgment was arrested.

*Note.*— Vide *Chilty’s Pleadings,*120.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

arras or THE SIONITARY

E o 

•

MIIIORANDUM Fat ECM. 131111ERAL CURTIN SAMS

Effective immediately the CORM program will be handled

mithin the SANDS management structure insofar as Air Force actions

and authority are concerned. luta* regard, the Office of Missile

and Satellite Systems will handle all *blacks aspects of the

DISCOVERER project. The mamma project and all %whiten aspects

of the program mill continue to be handled by the normel Air Staff

offices.

You and properly cleared members of your office are

instructed to show this latter to properly cleared personnel as my

be required to establish your authority and responsibilities in

this matter.

Under Secretary of the Air Force
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2377

JUNE BRYANT-BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF WANDIE VINCENT; DETECTIVE REED; DEPUTY PARKER; DEPUTY JANE DOE; MAGISTRATE SHEARN; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; LAWRENCE SOLOMON; NEAL VAUGHAN; Lt. C. A. COLEMAN; Lt. POWELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ARCHER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PHILLIPS, all in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (CA-05-34-2)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
June Bryant-Bunch, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Vaughan, Woodland, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR TMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: June Bryant-Bunch seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of her motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Bryant-Bunch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. American Fed'n of Gov't Employees , 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-05 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon , 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir. 1973). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2012-1321

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM147AD

A310-57-2081, R02 --- 10/18/07

A310-57-2081, R01 --- 2/26/03

A310-57-2082, R02 --- 10/17/08

A310-57-2082, R01 --- 8/22/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                            STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
                            AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2002


Owns 100% of:

 Sterling Fibers, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 Sterling Chemicals Acquisitions, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        Owns 100% of:


        Sterling Australian Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        Sterling (Sask) Holdings Ltd., an Ontario corporation

               Owns 100% of:

               Sterling Pulp Chemicals (Sask) Ltd., an Ontario corporation

                     Owns 100% of

                     619220 Saskatchewan Ltd., a Saskatchewan corporation

Sterling Chemicals International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Sterling Chemicals Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Sterling Chemicals Marketing, Inc., a Barbados corporation

Sterling Canada, Inc., a Delaware corporation

              Owns 100% of:

               Sterling Pulp Chemicals US, Inc., a Delaware corporation

                     Owns 100% of:

                     Sterling Pulp Chemicals, Inc., a Georgia corporation

               Sterling NRO, Ltd., an Ontario corporation

               Sterling Pulp Chemicals, Ltd., an Ontario corporation

               Sterling Pulp Chemicals Fuzhou, Ltd., an Ontario corporation
# C_2005082EN.01001702.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/17

---

Action brought on 9 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Portuguese Republic

(Case C-53/05)

(2005/C 82/36)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Portuguese Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by P. Andrade and W.Wils, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Portuguese Republic, by having exempted all categories of establishments from the obligation to pay remuneration to authors on public lending, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5, in conjunction with Article 1, of Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Portuguese Republic, by having exempted all categories of establishments from the obligation to pay remuneration to authors on public lending, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5, in conjunction with Article 1, of Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property;

1

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Before the adoption of Directive 92/100, Portuguese law did not recognise an author's right to remuneration on the lending of a work in relation to which the distribution right was exhausted. Currently Portuguese law recognises the right to remuneration but, by exempting all categories of public-lending establishments from the obligation to pay such remuneration, for the purposes of Directive 92/100, it has rendered that right ineffective and has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1 and 5 of the directive.

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61.

1

---
Appro d f R I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

ve or eease:2018/11/16C05115212 

CENTRAL INTELUGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25. D. C. 

OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

16 October 1963 

The Honorable Brockway McMillan 

Director, National Reconnaissance Office 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Dear Brock: 

This refers to your memorandmn of 12 August 1963, Subject: 

TAGBOARD, in which you reaffirmed the transfer of management 

responsibilities for TAGBOARD from Program B to Program D. 

I also refer to subsequent discussions I have had with you and 

Dr. Fubini in this regard. 

The Central Intelligence Agency is now prepared to transfer 

technical direction of this project from Program B to Program D. 

The CIA, through the Office of Special Activities, will continue to 

provide appropriate contractual support, as well as other support, 

in conformance with the NRO agreement. 

Mr. James A. Cunningham is designated the individual in the 

Office of Special Activities of the DD/S&T, CIA, as the contact for 

effecting this transfer. 

Faithfully yours, 

Marshall S. Carter 

Lieutenant General, USA 

Deputy Director 

8 YE ~f 4 1 r / \I~I \1\\\ 11\\\111\\\1111111\\\\\\\\1\ \\\11 \I\~ \\~I \\\11 ~\\\ \~II \I\~ \\1\ \\\1\ \I~\ \I~ \\\\\ \~I\ \1\\\ \~\I \ \\ \\ \~ BYE 24133-63 Copy.-i-

--------------- -----------------

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115212 

.... 

-
.r" ~~Ji ",' 

~ '-J . . -. Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115212 

c."·,', ,,'.' 'u.t . '~= 

, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WAst-IiNGTON 

e: UNDER SECRETARY 

,/55-( 

55-f; 

/?F- ( 

~,," r~iPO·;.l } f;'1,£O:'; ~~Ji'lC ll'~iG.\.t:\1).I.~~t}; 

·I:"i;~.~ -5200':"10 'DOES nO'll APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115212 

I 

i
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Philip L.
Jones, as Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Profile
Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Profile Technologies, Inc.


                                            /s/ Philip L. Jones
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Philip L. Jones
                                            Chief Operating Officer and
                                            Executive Vice President
iI

--10P-SECIET--

-48) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

li

THE NRO STAFF

2

September 12, 1973

SUBJECT: Briefing to PFIAB Executive Secretary

Recently I offered the NRO briefing to Mr. Wheaton Byers,

Executive Secretary of the PFIAB, and his assistant, Cdr L. H.

Olmer. They have accepted and we have tentatively set aside

two hours either Thursday morning or Friday morning,

September 20 or 21. They would like very much to meet with

you and other key members of the Staff to hear our regular

front end and systems briefing. In addition they have asked

for some discussion time. They indicated a desire to work

some specific issues with respect to the NRP, and that they

would ask us for inputs. I do not know the exact nature of

what they intend to do. While we do not wish to make an

additional work load on the Staff, we should explore ways

in which the PFIAB can be of assistance to our cause.

Will it be possible for you to meat with these gentlemen

pn the 20 or 21?

iI

FREDERICK L. HOFMANN

Lt Colonel, USAF

,••••• n I

•

•••••• •

l

k.

r; 4+, 4 c-11 ..„

.•

- I

Al4

mamma) IIMPT MON CONTROL NO Internal

exacurive man masmon mac --TOPSECET- COPIES OVISSAL MI OP

GOOV OSCLASSIP/ ON IMP MT. PAGE 1 OF PAGES •

I

0,2/..%e'e•• •

h // • • 4% •

.•

7 •

•

1:••

Ii
#### Svacina, Appellant, vs. Greenzweig and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Joseph J. O’Day,*attorney, and *A. W. Schut2,*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents Phillipson: *Michael Levin*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.