alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         15,755
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 146,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                    18,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              196,505
<PP&E>                                                      2,241,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                                933,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              1,548,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         207,534
<BONDS>                                                       604,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        6,375
<OTHER-SE>                                                    615,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,548,277
<SALES>                                                       402,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              402,408
<CGS>                                                          28,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 296,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (1,539)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             29,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                49,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   26,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            23,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   23,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.36
        
 

</TABLE>
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Iowa - Fiscal Year 2024
Exhibit 4.3(B)

                                                       Form of Trust Agreement
                                                                 (Owner Trust)



     TRUST AGREEMENT, dated as of ___________ __, 200_, between Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Seller, and __________________, a
Delaware banking corporation, not in its individual capacity but solely as
Owner Trustee (the "Owner Trustee"). The Seller and the Owner Trustee hereby
agree as follows:

     1. The trust created hereby shall be known as "Chase Manhattan Auto Owner
Trust 200_-_", in which name the Owner Trustee may engage in the transactions
contemplated hereby, make and execute contracts, and sue and be sued.

     2. The Seller hereby assigns, transfers, conveys and sets over to the
Owner Trustee the sum of $1. The Owner Trustee hereby acknowledges receipt of
such amount in trust from the Seller, which amount shall constitute the
initial trust estate. The Owner Trustee hereby declares that it will hold the
trust estate in trust for the Seller. It is the intention of the parties
hereto that the Trust created hereby constitute a business trust under Chapter
38 of Title 12 of the Delaware Code, 12 Del. C. ss.3801 et seq., and that this
document constitutes the governing instrument of the Trust. The Owner Trustee
is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file a certificate of trust
with the Delaware Secretary of State in the form attached hereto.

     3. The Seller and the Owner Trustee will enter into an amended and
restated Trust Agreement, satisfactory to each such party, to provide for the
contemplated operation of the Trust created hereby. Prior to the execution and
delivery of such amended and restated Trust Agreement, the Owner Trustee shall
not have any duty or obligation hereunder or with respect to the trust estate,
except upon the written direction of the Seller to take such action as
determined by the Seller to be necessary to obtain prior to such execution and
delivery any licenses, consents or approvals required by applicable law or
otherwise.

     4. This Trust Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts.

     5. The Owner Trustee may resign upon thirty days prior notice to the
Seller.



<PAGE>
                                                                             2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Trust Agreement
to be duly executed by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized, as
of the day and year first above written.

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
                         Seller



                         By:      ______________________________
                                  Name:
                                  Title:



                         _____________________, not in its individual
                         capacity but solely as Owner Trustee



                         By:      ______________________________
                                  Name:
                                  Title:
rs

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON 20330

October 23, 1973

•

OFFICE OF THE 11416PIETAHT

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF, USAF

SUBJECT: Westover Air Force Base Closure

As you are aware, I have been interested in the actions

pertaining to the phase out of active Air Force units at

Westover Air Force Base as a result of the closure directed

by the Office of-the Secretary of Defense. In connection

with this closure, I have approved the reduction and ultimate

closure of the Air Force Special Projects Production Facility

along the following lines.

By early FY 1975 the military manning associated with this

activity will be reduced by about one half, permitting a turnin of unneeded spaces to the Air Force Systems Command.

Because certain of the activities presently carried out

at the Special Projects Production Facility must be located

elsewhere, it will continue in operation until alternate

facilities are available. The relocation of functions will

require retention and reallocation of some manpower spaces at

other locations. The remaining spaces will be returned to

Systems Command following closure of the facility at Westover

AFB.

Brigadier General John E. Kulpa, Jr., is the contact

point on my staff. He will keep you informed of activities

pertaining to the closure of this facility.

J u L. McLucas

cc: Commander, AFSC

Cbier'e4 E• SecAF 

E7rrr" Cr-r".AL

DEC! '"'":" • "1477111•E

OF OFf'.7"!.7. f:7":.: 1 11E52

EMS' TM CA Y....5li (3/

DECLASSIFY CI.JatDat.

ofittsa/111PR. WORKING COPY gip
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                        CURRENT DIRECTOR FEE ARRANGEMENTS

         Each member of the Board of Directors currently receives a monthly
retainer of $2,000, in the aggregate, for services as a director of the
Corporation and the Bank. Non-employee directors of the Corporation and the Bank
also receive compensation for their services as committee members. Non-employee
directors of the Executive, Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees of the
Corporation and the Bank each receive $500 per meeting attended, except for the
Chairman of the Audit Committee who receives $2,000 per month and the Chairman
of the Nominating Committee who receives $1,000 per meeting attended.

         Nonemployee directors serving on the Bank's Loan and Asset/Liability
Committees each receive $50 per meeting attended, except for the chairmen of
such committees who each receive $100 per meeting attended. Director Bobby L.
Hill receives $1,000 a month for serving as Chairman of the Board of Community
Central Mortgage Company, LLC, the Corporation's mortgage company subsidiary and
directors Salvatore Cottone, Ronald Reed and David Widlak each receive $500 a
month for serving as advisory board members to the mortgage company.

         Under the Corporation's 2002 Incentive Plan, which was approved by the
stockholders at the Corporation's annual meeting held in April 2002, each
director is awarded 300 shares of common stock of the Corporation annually. The
awards are made each year, on the first business day of the month following the
annual meeting of stockholders, from 2002 through 2010, during the period that
the director serves on the Board.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN, JOAN DONOHUE, on behalf of Todd Donohue, ALLEN V. HARINCK, RANDOLPH K. HINZ, JR., GERALD J. INNELLA,

KENNETH N. OLSON, DAVID E. OTT, JOSHUA S. RABINOWITZ, JEROME J. SCHUCK, JAMES W. SCHULTZ, JR., W ILLIAM A. TAYLOR,

GAETAN A. PASSANNANTE, RICHARD KAAPUNI, GARY W. DAVIS, THOMAS F. SPAYD, WILLIAM J. ROGALSKI, DIANA RAYMOND, Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 2222

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in No. 1:09

- cv

- 33307

- TMD

, Judge Thompson M. Dietz.

______________________ Case: 23-2222 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2023B EAVIS V

. US 2

O R D E R

The appellant s having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in
accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

August 28, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
Jarrett B. Perlow
Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 28, 2023 Case: 23-2222 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 08/28/2023
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.17 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                       AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 1, 1998


                          BA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 1998-3


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. as
successor in interest to Bank of America, FSB, the Master Servicer in connection
with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-3, do hereby certify that
(i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the pooling and servicing agreements,
including this Agreement, has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv Q75
#### Estate of Kitzerow: Kitzerow, Proponent, Appellant, vs. Schneider and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *A. D. Stroicf*of Manitowoc.

For the respondents: *Hougen & Brady*of Manitowoc.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM March 2014

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Pumping Plant (533) 

D.5 (+) Waste material from 

replaced/removed parts

D.2 (-) Energy use by the 

combustion system

D.1 (-) Air emissions from the 

combustion system

D.3 (+) 

infrastructure costs

D.4 (+/-) Operation 

and maintenance 

costs

Initial setting: Existing or proposed agricultural 

combustion system is higher-emitting or less energy 

efficient.

1. Installation, replacement, or retrofit of combustion 

system and/or related equipment for improving air 

emissions and/or energy efficiency

Start

I.2 (-) Emissions 

of oxides of 

nitrogen (NOx)

Combustion System Improvement (372)

C.1 (-) Ambient 

particulate matter 

concentrations

C.2 (-) Ambient 

ozone concentrations

C.3 (+) Local/regional 

air quality improvement

I.4 (-) Carbon 

dioxide emissions

I.3 (-) Cost of compliance 

with regulatory 

requirements, if applicable

I.1 (-) Direct 

emissions of 

particulate matter

I.5 (-) Energy 

costs

C.5 (+/-) Net farm 

income

C.4 (-) Atmospheric 

greenhouse gas 

concentrations
--RW-SECRET--

A-St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Telephone Call with Wheaton Byers, PFIAB

I called Mr. Byers to ascertain the status of NSCID 6.

He informed me that the NSCID was sent back to OMB for

substantial revision and that it would probably not be

ready for submission to the White House until late January.

He did not clarify what the revisions would be. He asked

" me if Dr. McLucas had coordinated on NSCID 6. I replied by

saying that Dr. &Lucas had not formally coordinated although

he had read the draft and had spoken with Mr. Packard and

Mr. Helms.

I told him of the new DOD Directive which, at the Secret

level, implements NSCID 6 and establishes the Central Security

Service. Mr. Byers asked me if Dr. McLucas had coordinated on

the directive. I said no.

He asked me if we had a problem with NSCID 6. I said

that it appeared that there were some ambiguities with

regard to the on orbit control and tasking. I asked him

if the PFIAB had commented on that paragraph. He did not

directly respond.

He then went'on to ask me what the present philosophy

was with regard to design and operation of NRO spacecraft

and whether NSA actually designed the spacecraft. I covered

the process, describing the USIB requirement establishment,

the ExCom function, the allocation of design and development

TH NRO STAFF December 30, 1971

-TOP-SECRETistwors UM. 1114.01106 4 1:06‘

Oft Mx egcmc Of II I I Ion ►r 11 14 •

immam Internal
S.

responsibilities, the the launch responsibilities, and the onorbit control and tasking. -I mentioned the ro

.in advising_the F in the ExCom, the

He asked me what the NRO would want to see in. the NSCID.

In response, I stated that the new directive and NSCID could

possibly create more conflict and ambiguity than exists today

under the present fairly satisfactory interface between the

NRO and NSA and that confusion could exist in separating the

on-orbit functions by directive. The NRO would prefer to

see the particular paragraph deleted and reworked to reflect

the present management arrangement.

Mr. Byers seemed to be in agreement and when I mentioned

that we anticipated that Dr. McLucas might speak with Mr. Laird

about the DOD Directive, he asked if Dr. *Lucas would call

him to relay Mr. Laird's views. I told him that I would make

this suggestion to Dr. McLucas.

Mr. Byers said that he was extremely appreciative of

the phone call.

Major, USAF

it

--Et-sEeREF--

anulalal rose 4414sn it4 awaiteft.

1100 essivrivt !IM! 10 sets lel •aft,

monies Internal 

espy

sr Cain

Pain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0100

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 5 2024

04/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0100
# CA2005110EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 110/1

---

NOTICE TO READER

Image

---
c 

# •

MINISTERE DE L'ECOLOGIE, DUDEVELOPPEMENTDURABLE ETDE L'ENERGIE Direction generale de /'Aviation civile
Directiondu Transporta€rien Sous-directiondes Transporteurs etServices

### aeriens 

# 0 l 

### 'i Reference: 

# 1

# 3
- "l\ ' /DTA/SDT Affaire suivie par :Virginie FIOUX virginie.fioux@aviation-civile.gouv.fr Tel. +33158 os 37 71- Fax :+33158 os 38 65 Objet: : Reciprocity certificate
Dear Sir, Paris, le

# 2 3 AVR.

# 2013



# - M. Paul GRETCH Director of Office of International Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street S.W. WASHINGTON DC 20590 USA

Further to the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed in Washington on 30 April 2007 between the European Community and the Government of the United States ofAmerica and the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed on 18 June 1998 between the Government of the French Republic and the Government of the United States as amended, the French civil aviation authorities herewith confirm that they will grant, on the basis of reciprocity, rights to U.S. air carriers to provide non scheduled flights to/from the French territory. This letter will remain valid 12 months after its date of signature. Yours sincerely.

### ~ 

# i £ Present pour l'avenir
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Lakeisha Demerson, MD v. Kiesta Smith, Individually and as next 

friend of XXXXXX XXXXXX, a minor

Appellate case number: 01-22-00579-CV

Trial court case number: 2022-01500

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

On August 17, 2022, the trial court reporter filed a recorder’s record of two electronically

recorded proceedings held on July 18, 2022. On August 30, 2022, this Court issued an order 

explaining that the filed record did not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

34.6(a)(2) and 13.2 because the recorder’s record did not contain certified copies of the court 

recorder’s log(s). We ordered court reporter Julia Rivera to file certified copies of the required 

log(s) within 30 days of our order pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.6(a)(2) and 

13.2.

On September 2, 2022, Ms. Rivera filed a court recorder’s log for a separate hearing held 

on August 22, 2022, as well as a recording of that hearing. None of the required logs we ordered 

her to file for the two July 18, 2022 proceedings has been filed .

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.6(a)(2) and 13.2, court reporter Julia 

Rivera is ORDERED to file certified copies of the required log(s) for the July 18, 2022 hearings

within 30 days of the date of this order.

Appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after the court reporter files a compliant recorder’s 

record for the July 18, 2022 hearings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: September 8, 2022
7 January 74

NOTE FOR LT COL ADDISON

There are two recently constituted

committees with which Nr. Plummer may

have a direct involvement. They are

The Intelligence Resources

Advisory Committee (IRAC). He may be

invited by the chairmen to attend

meetings as an advisor. whenever

appropriate.

The Research and Development

Council of the IRAC which is chaired by

Dr. Currie. For matters affecting the

NRP, eitherlft. Plummer or myself will

be in attendance.

John E. Kulpa, Jr.

Brig General, USAF

•

?• :;Y •./.- •
Lt Colonel, U$F

NIMLN, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

.4

THE NRO STAFF January 7, 1974

NOTE FOR COLONEL ADDISON

Here is a listing of boards and committees on which the

DNRO sits:

He is a member ex officio of the NRP Executive

Committee. The Agreement for Reorganization of the National

Reconnaissance Program, August 11, 1965, para D 1 specifies

the membership of the NRP Executive Committee. This is no

longer current, however, because the DCI currently chairs

the ExCom and the ASD(I) is the only other member. 'Para D 1

says that the DNRO will sit with the Executive Committee but

not be a voting member. The duties of the DNRO are more

fully explained in pare E 2.

The DNRO sits with the USIB for matters affecting

the NRP (reference pare E 2 g of the August 11, 1965 Agreement).

The DNRO sits as a member of the National Security

Action Memorandum 156 Committee. This committee seldom meets,

and most actions are handled by the Working Group.

The DNRO is the Chairman of the Interdepartmental

Contingency Planning Committee. For practical purposes, the

ICPC principals do not hold formal meetings but act individually

when needed. Staffing and coordination is handled by the

Secretariat, which is headed by General Kulpa.

You will find the August 11, 1965 Agreement and committee

membership in the Key National Reconnaissance Program Documents

book which we recently forwarded to Mr. Plummer.

•

•

•

CLASSIFIED

.1111111.

EXEMPT rim cdtrrnot.

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE _I_OP 1 PAGES

ENNEDAL DICLASSUNCATION SCHEDULE OF

execonsva ohm IISSE EXEMPTION CATE•

DONY 1112 DECLASSIFY ON IMP DM

a••••r• •

•:411rba, 1

• • • • ••• • •