alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 07:52:46



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 07:52:46

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 50

ABX ABX AIR 2

ACA AIR CANADA 24

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 4

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 6

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 882

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 32

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 2

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

EVA EVA AIRLINES 2

FDX FED EX 9

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 27

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 10

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 32

POE PORTER AIRLINES 16

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 3

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 10

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 3

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
Th eHONORABLE D. BROOK BARTLETT, Chief Judge, United State s 1 District Court for the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1376

___________ Charles Loewe, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. United States of America; U.S. * Marshall Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] *

Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 5, 1997 Filed: November 12, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Char les Loewe appeals from the district court & s 1 orde rs denying his post-judgment motions in this 2 8 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding. After careful review of th e-2-

record for abuse of discretion, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-3-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           259,199
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,855
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,194
<EQUITIES>                                     4,521
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,660
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 280,431
<CASH>                                         5,841
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             12,343
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         12,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,278
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                156,622
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            66,069
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 11,828
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          129,927
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,278
<PREMIUMS>                                     149,220
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            18,077
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             5,406
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,020
<BENEFITS>                                     103,301
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    41,787
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,747
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  3.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.51
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 141,220
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            107,273
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,972)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             49,858
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               40,258
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                156,622
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        3,972



</TABLE>
via BYEMAN 

ontroi System 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2015 

TOP, SECRET 

Satellite Operations Section, 

Deputy for Satellite Operations 

-(6) NRO Staff 

MOW: SMSgt Delmar Hansen 

Backup: TSgt Swanson 

TSgt Quinton 

Tsst Parker 

SSgt Businski 

SSgt Gavich 

Duty Subjects: 

Responsible to Deputy for Satellite Operations for providing operational 

support services to project officers on all-Mt NRP satellite operations responsibilities assigned. 

Action. Items: 

GENERAL: Will support each project officer in pre- and post launch 

ftmctions. These include assisting project officers in programming, plotting 

ground track of all-e3}NRO Satellites and maintaining the current status of 

missions in progress. Prepare and display briefing materials in support of all 

-{ls} NRP satellite operations. Maintains history of put mission effectiveness. 

SPECIFIC: 

a. Provide for maiming of satellite operations cuter at all times 

photo intuiting are in progress and such time. during maw operations as the 

project 01C may deem necessary. 

b. Monitors re-entry of satellite vehicles and maintains on-duty 

watch during periods of predicted =controlled re-entry. Plots predicted impact 

points. 

c. Assists all project officers in pre-mission programming of 

photo and SIGI;NT missions. 

d. Determines accuracy of printed ephemerides based on known 

criteria and plots all mission traces . 

- 
PAGE_,20F_2__PAGES 

TOP SECRET 

2.,1-1, •-t 

. . 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE BYEMAN 

9 November 2015 --T-eF-SGRET--- 

e. Maintains a flow chart of mission take from photographic 

missions from recovery to the processing facility and delivery of priority 

one take to SPECTRE. 

f. Responsible for proper distribution of message traffic to 

appropriate sections. 

g. Schedules use of SOC briefing room and Satellite Operations 

Section personnel working periods. 

h. Aids in preparation of SOC briefings. 

1. Responsible for operation and maintenance of Data Plotter. 

j. Maintains current file of available ephemerides, put mission 

data and mission history lop. 

E=DED 

:Ron:2; DOD DI._ b200.10 

DOES NOT API'LY 

••■•••011111.11MONIONMENI S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,037,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,204,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                   468,935
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,996,234
<PP&E>                                      20,728,385
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,320,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,815,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,467,143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,817
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,323,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,815,145
<SALES>                                      5,980,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,850,657
<CGS>                                        3,584,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,584,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,047,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,588,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,588,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,588,892)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)


</TABLE>
# C_2004262EN.01006004.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/60

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-52/04 (1)

1

(2004/C 262/112)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 6 July 2004, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-52/04, Luis Escobar Guerrero v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      290
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,562
<PP&E>                                           1,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,578
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     (21,163)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,284
<SALES>                                          5,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,143
<CGS>                                            1,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,877
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46


</TABLE>
# C_2004284EN.01002001.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/20

---

Action brought on 11 August 2004 by Stephen Stork against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-331/04)

(2004/C 284/40)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 August 2004 by Stephen Stork, Chaumont-Gistoux (Belgium), represented by Bernd Arians, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission's decision of 5 May 2004 on the applicant's complaint and the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 classing the applicant in Grade A7; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision of 5 May 2004 on the applicant's complaint and the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 classing the applicant in Grade A7;

| — | require the Commission to adopt a new decision on the applicant's grade, including a full statement of reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

require the Commission to adopt a new decision on the applicant's grade, including a full statement of reasons;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant contests the Commission's decision to class him in Grade A7, Step 3. He alleges errors of assessment in the application of Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations.

The applicant submits that the contested decision fails to take account of facts relating to the quality of the applicant's professional experience which are of fundamental relevance to classification and that there was a failure to recognise the relevance of those facts in recruiting the applicant to his first post and to take proper account of the defendant's recruitment needs.

Moreover, the applicant alleges a failure to exercise discretion, infringement of the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and of equal treatment, procedural errors and failure to give a proper statement of reasons.

---
Exhibit 31.1I, Richard K. Crump, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 15, 2006       /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP     Richard K. Crump    President and Chief Executive Officer  
3
# Illinois State Office

2118 W Park CtChampaignIL61821-2986

217-353-6600

2118 W Park CtChampaignIL61821-2986

Illinois

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Illinois 
-  Illinois State Office 

Welcome to the State Office website and directory. State level leadership activities happen here at the Champaign, IL office. See information below to reach out or contact program or technical specialists. For local support, contact your county level office or District Conservationist.

## Welcome to NRCS in Illinois!

### Tammy Willis, State Conservationist

Illinois NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, works to conserve the natural resources across Illinois. Illinois NRCS is headquartered out of Champaign, IL and delivers conservation technical and financial assistance through our 93 service centers throughout the state and partner agencies.

Our State Office in Champaign hosts the Plant Materials Garden, with species of warm season grasses, cool season grasses, forbs and legumes. Please feel free to visit our plant materials garden any time between 8:00 am and 4:30 pm. The garden is in the west parking lot of the USDA-NRCS building.

## Key Contacts

### Tammy Willis

                -    217-353-6601 
                -    tammy.willis@usda.gov 

### Lisa Pyle

                -    217-353-6627 
                -    lisa.pyle@usda.gov 

### Eric Gerth

                -    217-353-6628 
                -    eric.gerth@usda.gov 

### Paula Hingson

                -    217-353-6602 
                -    paula.hingson@usda.gov 

### Ben Schmidt

                -    217-353-6630 
                -    ben.schmidt@usda.gov 

### Jamie Alderks

                -    217-353-6628 
                -    jamie.alderks@usda.gov 

### Winnie Chen

                -    217-353-6621 
                -    winnie.chen@usda.gov 

### Aaron Patrick

                -    217-353-6636 
                -    aaron.patrick@usda.gov 

----

##   Employee Directory
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven by decision of that court of 26 January 2005 in the case of Maatschap J. and G.P. and A.C. Schouten v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-34/05)

(2005/C 93/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court for Trade and Industry) (Netherlands) of 26 January 2005, received at the Court Registry on 31 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Maatschap J. and G.P. and A.C. Schouten and Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit on the following questions:

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 (OJ L 160, p. 21).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 of 23 December 1992 (OJ L 391, p. 36).

----
#### G. Reinke & Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellants : *Coleman •& Barry*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *Orland S. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
1St NATIONAL NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

•ASHINOTON, D.C. ' 111111111111W1111111

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR June 30, 1972

tr.

NOTE FOR MR. KRUEGER

Thank you for sending me the copy of your May 16

internal memorandum on defining outer space. I think

that it would be appropriate to provide some thoughts

to you and General Smart on this issue as seen from the

NRO perspective. As you know, we have been following

the activities of the UN Outer Space Committee quite

closely over the past several years. We have worked

directly with OSD(ISA) and State on many issues, including

the definition question. In view of our overall impression

of the recent meeting of the Legal Subcommittee, we are

somewhat surprised to note the sense of urgency perceived

by our re resentative to the suggestion raised by one of

epresentatives.

We believe that it would be advisable to continue a

low-key attitude toward entering discussions on defining

outer apace. To enter a protracted legalistic debate on

the issue at this time might serve to focus an undesired

amount of attention upon the operational nature of U.S.

reconnaissance programs which are dependent upon a permissive environment. Furthermore, should UN debate result

in an untenable lower limit of space, say 150 km, our

capabilities would be impaired. We have found it prudent

in the past to avoid stimulating UN discussion of the

issue and feel that it would be wise to continua this

policy.

Informal discussions with OSD(ISA) and State indicate

support for holding back on the issue and not taking an •

-111-sEcmTMUNI= /Is. Mrftlai.t asNIMPINI

NO wle..I sass is sees win ow.

De11111W11.,71

OMR CIMPUIS
11111-SECRET 111/11111 C0000.. SVVie

initiative in introducing the subject. We do not feel

that the territorial water analogy is valid with regard

to space, since no country except the Soviet Union and

perhaps the U.S. has the ability to "enforce" encroachment

on territorial space at this time.

We would appreciate your good offices in requesting

your international people to adopt a low-key view of the

definition question until some future time--at least until

such time as the legality and ethicality of earth resources

surveying has been sorted out in the UN forum.

11111111111

F. Robert Naka

Ina 4111-SEGRET-

&241,714412931-72

.

.—

CO.. Or C000lS

COMBO. 1 n 0

000 autimay 1143,1.6

000 DOICChyl step '0 00? 40.•