alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 8 OF
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         $30,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (453)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,721
<PP&E>                                          32,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,055
<SALES>                                         61,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,474
<CGS>                                           40,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Simone Blank, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ---------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|November 18, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Jost Fischer
|                  |  |  |  | Name:            |  | Jost Fischer                        
|                  |  |  |  | Title:           |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |  |  |                  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000320446
<NAME> ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           24477
<SECURITIES>                                      7265
<RECEIVABLES>                                    44323
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1062
<INVENTORY>                                       9007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 84967
<PP&E>                                          534450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  285547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  519011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            65715
<BONDS>                                         107810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       4499
<COMMON>                                          9312
<OTHER-SE>                                      265821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    519011
<SALES>                                          13920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                194901
<CGS>                                            11305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   136246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  56335
<INCOME-TAX>                                     22735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              33600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     33431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .912
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .912
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1248

 To amend the Federal Reserve Act to reform the Federal Reserve System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2015

Ms. Warren (for herself and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Reserve Act to reform the Federal Reserve System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fed Accountability Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. OFFICE STAFF FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE 
              FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.

    Section 11(l) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(l)) is 
amended by inserting ``Of amounts made available for staff of the 
Federal Reserve System, each member of the Board of Governors may 
employ not more than 4 individuals for the purpose of staffing the 
member's office, with such individuals selected by such member and the 
salaries of such individuals set by such member.'' after the period at 
the end.

SEC. 3. VOTE BY BOARD OF GOVERNORS ON CERTAIN SETTLEMENTS.

    Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (12) (12 U.S.C. 247b) as 
        paragraph (11); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12)(A) The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
        System shall vote, at a properly noticed public meeting of the 
        Board, on whether to resolve any enforcement action if the 
        resolution of that action involves the payment of not less than 
        $1,000,000 in compensation, penalties, or fines, or other 
        payments.
            ``(B) The results of the vote of each member of the Board 
        under subparagraph (A) shall--
                    ``(i) be included at the appropriate place in the 
                official minutes of the Board; and
                    ``(ii) be made publicly available on the website of 
                the Board.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Spaulding, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Eastman and another, Appellants.

For the appellants Robert Eastman: *Fisher & Fisher*of Janesville; Western Casualty & Surety Company: Nolan, Dougherty, *Grubb & Ryan*of Janesville.

For the respondent: *Jeffris,*Mouat, *Oestreich, Wood & Cunningham*of Janesville.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
INS

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF 25 July 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR M. PLUMMER

SUBJECT: NRO National Imagery Plan for Satellites

The right hand memorandum is the acknowledgement of our

development of a National Imaging Plan for Satellites (NIPS).

You will note that a September report on elements of the NIPS

is proposed. This, in my view, will consist of a personal

discussion between you, Mr. Colby and Dr. Rill. This first

meeting will probably outline the general NIPS effort and

provide specific comments on elements of the first base such

as the progress of the recently NRO establishe

110111,111WImaging Program.

There would be a definite advantage if such informal

discussions on the NIPS, as proposed in September, could be

a continuing effort at three to six month intervals, depend.

ing upon significant developments within the NIPS.

-. pa, r.

igadier General, USAF

Director

. .

CONTROL NO Internal 

COPY OF COPIES

MOS j16....OF 1 PAGES

•
II-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

iiii111111,11

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

MENCRANDUMFORNR. COLBY, DCI

DR. BALL, ASD(I)

SUBJECT: NRO National Imaging Plan for Satellites

Last week we discussed my development of the National

Imaging Plan for Satellites (NIPS) which I intend to integrate eventually with the SIGINT plan in order to define

the total thrust of the NRP in the 1980's.

As a result of our discussions I an proceeding with the

first phase of the NIPS. This phase builds upon current NRO

projects and programs and is directed primarily at building

an adequate base upon which potential system capabilities

for the 1980's can be defined. A time phased plan is being

developed identifying actions required in the R&D or operations areas. Basic decision points necessary to reach

specific objectives considering the technical, economic, and

operational feasibility will also be identified.

Upon completion of the first phase I will sponsor a

detailed intelligence community evaluation of those alternatives found to be feasible for the 1980's. This will give

each element of the community an opportunity to express views

on the potential of various alternatives as well as to provide a positive feedback for out year NRP resource allocation

decisions.

I will provide you with a progress report on elements

of the first phase of the NIPS in September.

J. W. Plummer

•

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE OF PAGES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3090202
<SECURITIES>                                     40000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4021846
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (20000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16566342
<PP&E>                                       126606579
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3943965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               147012171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         23751298
<BONDS>                                       61321707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   36246775
<COMMON>                                      23303055
<OTHER-SE>                                    13226123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 147012171
<SALES>                                       52835248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              53256297
<CGS>                                         46495602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 54937756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5238540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2042610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (6919999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    128427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7048426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7048426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>
a'4 " " &MUD '

_10P-SECREr

)51/NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

:rue %inn (TAFF September 12, 1969

NOTE FOR CAPTAIN WILSON

SUBJECT: NRP Annex to the Space Task Group Report

I have sent copies of Mr. Laird's memorandum and the NRP

Annex to the STG Report to:

Mr. Kiley for Mr. Helms

Mr. Jessup for Mr. Mitchell

Mr. Chapin for Dr. Kissinger

Mr. McAfee for Ambassador Johnson

I have asked that the documents be returned to me once the

principals have completed their review. Copies for Mr. Packard's

review are attached.

Also attached is Colone ote which responds to Mr.

Packard's question as to "Wh NASA?" on the readout

technology program referenced on page 3 of the Annex.

one ,

hments

'8262-69

3098-69

3167-69

•

111110 

•

JOILSECREr

CIC► ON I0ON bIONUITC SIGIMOOK

COMM.

COPTA111/ L" MINIS 1E

OM MACCTIrC Si00 1• NHS MP AIM% / • ON
Director

10P-SECRErAsi NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

AFF September 12, 1.969

water supplies, ice conditions, etc. The economic argument is

for such surveys. NASA is primarily interested in satellites,

have economic benefit by returning photographs of crop conditions,

weak at best and critics have pointed out the advantage of aircraft

NOTE FOR MR. PACKARD

NASA argues that an Earth Resources Satellite program will

You asked: "Why is electronic readout better for NASA?"

however, and has concluded that, to be at all economic, the survey

satellite must be a very long lived satellite with electronic readout.

Their initial experirhents will use high resolution TV but they would

benefit greatly if more advanced sensors could be used. If NASA

were to establish a sound program of research and development in

electro-optical imaging devices, the broader base of technology

plus the presumed bold research approach of NASA would lend

support to our efforts in this area.

to. TOP4ECREr

mama goon *angina ammonia

1111L67

Mil 1 of 1 Irma %

so. statcnttc sago to 0515 Nog am,
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

● ●

●
# C_2004262EN.01002902.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/29

---

Action brought on 21 June 2004 by Anne Koistinen against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-259/04)

(2004/C 262/57)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 June 2004 by Anne Koistinen, residing in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission not to grant her the expatriation allowance provided for by Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and to establish her place of origin as Brussels; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission not to grant her the expatriation allowance provided for by Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and to establish her place of origin as Brussels;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant entered the service of the Commission on 16 January 2002, as a member of the auxiliary staff. On 1 July 2003 she was appointed as a probationary official. Before entering the service of the Commission, she had worked for a private firm in Brussels from 15 January 1996 to 16 August 1998, for the same firm in Helsinki from 17 August 1998 to 2 September 1998 and from 7 September 1998 to 15 January 2002 in Brussels for ‘Finpro’, a Finnish non profit-making organisation.

By this action the applicant contests the decision of the Commission not to grant her the expatriation allowance. She pleads a breach of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations, pointing out that she did not live in Brussels or carry out her principal professional activity there for the whole of the reference period laid down by that provision, as she lived and worked in Helsinki from 17 August 1998 to 2 September 1998. In the alternative, she submits that ‘Finpro’ was part of the Finnish Permanent Representation to the European Union and that, therefore, the period during which she worked there should not be taken into account as that constituted work done for another State.

---
# C_2004281EN.01000101.xml

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 November 2004

(2004/C 281/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3026 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4329 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,971 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5203 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,83 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5777 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,328 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6811 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4323 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2577 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 900 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,443 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 893 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6709 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5506 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1257 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8446 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1458 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7866 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3026

JPY

Japanese yen

135,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4329

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70135

SEK

Swedish krona

8,971

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5203

ISK

Iceland króna

86,83

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5777

CZK

Czech koruna

31,328

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6811

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4323

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2577

ROL

Romanian leu

39 900

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,443

TRL

Turkish lira

1 893 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6709

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5506

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1257

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8446

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1458

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,51

ZAR

South African rand

7,7866

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
l you • 3 1/41(.0 .

September 15, 1957 .

Program Number Title

Tactical Communications Satellite

Meteorological Satellite

Non Orbital Satellite Interceptor

(Alternate Payload) (USAF)

Launch Detection Satellite

Initial Defense Communications

• Follow On IDCSP

US Navy Navigation Satellite Prograii

Follow On Satellite Interceptor (USAF

Detection Satellite •

n///4444e/64,

3/..12LE

•• •

NOTE FOR MR41111111111.CIA-OSP

Following is the list of so-called Military Space Program

Designators which we discussed.

A brief explanation of necessary restrictions. The number used

in conjunction with the title carries a military SECRET claisffication.

The numbers used alone -- UNCLASSIFIED. , les standing alone 94

UNCLASSIFIED. One exception: on Pro eteorologiaal

Satellite, we do not associate title with numbs any document with

a lesser classification than SECRET SPECIAL ACCESS (for obvious

reasons).

This is certainly no information; however, I have

classified this paper SECRET to protect the total listing since

I) you are not rigged for the Air Force Regulation 205-23 type

SPECIAL ACCESS and 2) it can be transmitted to yon so easily.

.471rippit

•'•(•...t
• 1.,!.1

FELE RA

CHM STTE

• e

You may use the listing under the normal restrictions I have

described.

Trust this will help.

•

4:

V;

•

Sincerely,

WILLIAM R. YOST

Lt Colonel. USAF

- r

Lt Col Yost/mjn
# C_2004260EN.01000502.xml

| 22.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/5

---

Corrigenda to calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’

(
  OJ C 170 of 30 June 2004
  )

(
  OJ C 170 of 30 June 2004

(2004/C 260/07)

On page 10, in section 6:

for:

‘15 October 2004’,

read:

‘20 October 2004’;

On page 12, in section 6:

for:

‘15 October 2004’,

read:

‘20 October 2004’.

---