alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IS/ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C. 111.11MEPIMMII

26 February 1969

MEMORANDUM FOR TCO/DOD (COLONEL CAPPELLETTI)

SUBJECT: Satellite Camera Manuals.

Referencing item 6 of your January 15, 1969 information Letter

No. 10 to all DOD/TC0s, a serious misconception may develop regarding security (access) policies on satellite camera manuals.

With the support of DIA and NPIC, access to satellite camera

manuals has been limited expressly to individuals having a very

direct and specific "must know." Essentially, these manuals are

for on-the-job PI'. and analysts. Your information letter could

give the impression that the documents are available to a larger

audience than we intend. •

We will not, of course, restrict access if a specific need exists,

particularly within those organizations directly involved in satellite

photographic interpretation and analysis. At the same time, it is

essential that the manuals not be available as advertised within the

overall TALENT-KEYHOLE system to personnel involved in the

general field of strategic uses of earth sensors or interpretation.

We need your help in enforcing specific "must know" for these

documents. Specifically, please ask your staff to take these actions:

Make sure that all access to KH Manuals continues to be

handled on a registry basis, providing a permanent record of all

persons granted access.

Make sure that any Manuals provided to the "community" on

other than a very strict "must know" basis are recalled at once.

Malik! We

0111•121k IMMO IMMO VON IVIIMMIK*WM

IWO 801011•11 OM is MS up am,
3. Publish a notice in your next information letter clarifying

access policy for KH Manuals. It might be worded as follows:

"Satellite camera manuals are available only to

personnel authorized access after a specific "must

know" has been validated. Must-know is restricted

to those people who cannot work effectively in satellite analysis or interpretation without knowing camera

system specifications. Essentially this means a

limited group within the analyst/interpreter community. A permament record must be maintained

of all personnel granted access to these manuals."

Colonel, USAF

Deputy Director

NRO Staff

TOP SECRET listuatill NNW auswasse

IMIII0e91 WIN le SOIS en am.

an..... TCS 37570-69

pre owns

mots
# C_2005115EN.01004004.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/40

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-412/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/73)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 25 February 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-412/03, Angelo Wille v European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6151

JOHN GRIMES WELLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HAROLD THOMAS, Sergeant,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-625-1)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Grimes Wells, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wells

v. Thomas, No. CA-96-625-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 219 

AN ACT 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey 

boundary and to provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 219 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Swan Lake Hydro3 electric Project Boundary Correction Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE 

5 SWAN LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

6 BOUNDARY. 

7 Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, after consulta9 tion with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall— 

10 (1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract 

11 of Federal land within the project boundary of the 

12 Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2911) 

13 as generally depicted and labeled ‘‘Lost Creek’’ on 

14 the map entitled ‘‘Swan Lake Project Boundary— 

15 Lot 2’’ and dated February 1, 2016; and 

16 (2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the 

17 tract described in paragraph (1) in accordance 

18 with— 

19 (A) the survey authorized under paragraph 

20 (1); 

21 (B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 

22 (commonly known as the ‘‘Alaska Statehood 

23 Act’’) (48 U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85– 

24 508); and 
3 

•HR 219 EH

1 (C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act 

2 (16 U.S.C. 818). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 219 

AN ACT 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project surrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska. of the remaining tract of land within the cor- vey boundary and to provide for the conveyance
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act: Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 19, 2015.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047,1775 Duke Street (All visitors 
must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Regulatory Flexibility Act 
Definition of Small Entity for Consideration of Regulatory Relief.
    2. Taunton Federal Credit Union (Taunton, MA), Request to Expand 
Community Charter.
    3. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the 
Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-02955 Filed 2-9-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y GREA TLAKE S NATIONA L PROGRA M OFFIC E 7 7 WES TJACKSO N BOULEVAR D CHICAGO , I L 60604-359 0 \ PRO^ & 

# JU L 1 1 

# 201 4
Lyn n Fiedle r Actin g Chief , Ai r

Qualit y Divisio n Michiga n Department

o f Environmenta l Qualit y P.O

. Bo x 3047 3 Lansing , Michiga n 4890 9 Dear Ms

. Fiedler : Thi s lette r

i s i n respons e to you r

Jul y 10 , 2014 , submissio n o f th e Clea n Ai r

Ac t (CAA ) sectio n 110(a)(1 ) an d(2) , "infrastructure " stat e implementatio n pla n (SIP ) fo r the 200 8 8-hour

ozone , 201 0 nitroge n dioxid e (N0 2 ) , 201 0 sulfu r dioxid e (S0 2 ) , an d201 2 annua l fin e particl e (PM2 .5 ) Nationa l Ambien t

Ai r Qualit y Standard s (NAAQS ) an dth e subsequent clarificatio n letter

date d Jul y 11 , 2014

. Th e requeste dsubmissio n i s intende dto demonstrat e tha t the stat e o f Michiga n ha s al l necessary authority , resources , an dpersonne l t o implemen t an dsatisfactoril y complet e th e ai r qualit y management

requirement s se

t fort hi n sectio n 110(a)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f the CA A wit h respec t t o eac hNAAQS

. Specifically , th e SI P submissio n i s intende dto addres s the requirement s o f CA A sectio n 110(a)(2)(A ) - sectio n 110(a)(2)(M ) fo r eac hNAAQS , wit hth e followin g exceptions : sectio n 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I ) wit hrespec t to th e 200 8 ozone , 201 0 S0 2 , an d201 2 PM2

. 5 NAAQS , i.e., Michigan' s SI P submissio n intende dto addres s sectio n 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I ) applie s onl y to th e 201 0 NO 2 NAAQS ; and , sectio n 110(a)(2)(I ) fo r eac hNAAQS , as th e requirement s containe di n thi s sectio n ar

e no t par t o f th e infrastructur e SI P process . E P A ha s determine dtha t th e submissio n i s complet e fo r eac ho f the remainin g element s fo r eac h NAAQS

. A findin g o f completenes s merel y indicate s tha t the submissio n meet s th e criteri atha t an y pla n mus t

satisf y fo r EP A to take rulemakin g actio n o n it

. A completenes s findin g i s no t a findin g o n the merit s o f the pla n or

whether i t meet s EPA' s SI P approva l requirements

. I f yo u hav e an y question s or nee dadditiona l informatio n pleas e contac t me , or And y Chang , o f m y staff, a

t 312-886-0258

.

Ai r an dRadiatio n Divisio n

Printe d o n 

# ® ecycle d Pape r
( 

NRqj~PPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DE~LASfIFIED BY:C/IART 

• 'OI!CLASilFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

" ; , . . .. ,y.. ";.t 

.'\..~~ \~:; :!:: ••. ,) 

. ~ 

; . 

i.; .: ... - ",,' 

V'.'::':: 

C " ,~, ... --- \. :r \,.1" 

r 

~ 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

9PTO-MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING 

Memorandum ME 83 

DATE: 

TO: P. Green 

FROM: L. Mo1askey -/'/' 

SUBJECT: Pictures of the Trieste 

( 

15 February 1972 

I have received a request n behalf of Cdr. E.,E. Henifin 

at the Pentagon for prints of some of the pictures taken on my recent trip 

aboard the White Sands. One 8 x 10 color print of the following: 

711314 711335 711370 

711317 711349 n1371 

711328 711357 711401 

711334 711366 

Please make copies of these prints as soon as convenient and notify 

me when they are ready. 

Thanks for yOur help on this order as well as the excellent support 

in the past. 

LM:cb 

cc: MFMaguire 

HWRobertson 

RWJones 

CICaratzas 

PPetty 

RRoylance 

JBraddon 

'OJ,:, .~ 

~ .. ~ ... ~.:~, t 

,-. " : -r ! .
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 101 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October 22, 2013

Rule Title(s): Definitions

Date Submitted to ARB: November 14, 2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): February 23, 2010

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Monica N. Soucier Phone Number: (760) 482-4606 E-mail Address: monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 101 Definitions is the general repository of all common definitions affecting various Imperial County Air 

Pollution Control District rule (Rulebook).

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):N/A

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission 

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible):

N/A
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Rule 101 is simply a repository for commonly defined terms within various Air District rules

5/1/2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES EDWARD BROOKS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 434 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 365 

WDA 2015 entered on October 22, 

2015, affirming the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Fayette County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. CP-26-CR0000386-2014 entered on February 17, 

2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime when 

said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty 

for [Petitioner’s] offense?

2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] 

to register for a lifetime?

The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the 

Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, 164 A.3d 1189

(Pa. 2017).
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

       
<CAPTION>




<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL YEAR-END>. . . . . .  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> . . . . . . .  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> . . . . . . . .  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>. . . . . . . .       12-MOS 
<CASH> . . . . . . . . . . .    5,170,969 
<SECURITIES> . . . . . . . .   13,873,351 
<RECEIVABLES>. . . . . . . .    6,969,122 
<ALLOWANCES> . . . . . . . .       13,694 
<INVENTORY>. . . . . . . . .       70,957 
<CURRENT ASSETS> . . . . . .            0 
<PP&E> . . . . . . . . . . .    1,839,992 
<DEPRECIATION> . . . . . . .      652,571 
<TOTAL ASSETS> . . . . . . .   30,331,142 
<CURRENT LIABILITIES>. . . .            0 
<BONDS>. . . . . . . . . . .   13,352,019 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>. . . .            0 
<PREFERRED>. . . . . . . . .   10,856,000 
<COMMON> . . . . . . . . . .        1,000 
<OTHER-SE> . . . . . . . . .    4,695,372 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   30,331,142 
<SALES>. . . . . . . . . . .            0 
<TOTAL REVENUES> . . . . . .   23,054,478 
<CGS>. . . . . . . . . . . .            0 
<TOTAL COSTS>. . . . . . . .            0 
<OTHER EXPENSES> . . . . . .    3,422,260 
<LOSS PROVISION> . . . . . .      100,000 
<INTEREST EXPENSE> . . . . .    3,117,211 
<INCOME-PRETAX>. . . . . . .  (10,770,792)
<INCOME-TAX> . . . . . . . .   (3,626,369)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>. . . . .            0 
<DISCONTINUED> . . . . . . .            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>. . . . . . .            0 
<CHANGES>. . . . . . . . . .            0 
<NET INCOME> . . . . . . . .   (7,144,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>. . . . . . . .        (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>. . . . . . . .        (1.31)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                         605,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,008,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,121,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,852,000
<PP&E>                                      31,230,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,675,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,428,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,175,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        91,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,592,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,428,000
<SALES>                                     90,015,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,015,000
<CGS>                                       60,572,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,572,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,062,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             296,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004262EN.01004001.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/40

---

Action brought on 26 July 2004 by Maison de l'Europe Avignon Méditerranée against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-302/04)

(2004/C 262/76)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 July 2004 by Maison de l'Europe Avignon Méditerranée, established in Avignon (France), represented by François Martineau, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 394 066.76 in respect of its failure to perform its financial obligations to the Maison de l'Europe Avignon Méditerranée; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 394 066.76 in respect of its failure to perform its financial obligations to the Maison de l'Europe Avignon Méditerranée;

| — | order the Commission to pay the entirety of the recoverable costs the amount of which is fixed in the sum of EUR 10 000. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the entirety of the recoverable costs the amount of which is fixed in the sum of EUR 10 000.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

According to the applicant, the Commission had since 1996 informally allowed the applicant to set up an Info Point Europe. In 2000, the applicant entered into an agreement with the Commission for the creation of an Info Point Europe, in the applicant's view thereby formalising the situation. In 2004, the agreement was terminated by the Commission.

By this action, the applicant seeks to have the Commission held contractually liable in order to obtain payment for the supplies rendered by the applicant since 1996 in the context of its task as a European information centre for the Commission.

According to the applicant, the Commission has breached its contractual obligations and is liable for interest for late payment, for services rendered during the festival of Avignon and for the cost of running a European documentation centre since 1996.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report (the
“Report”) of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2018,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By | /s/ Antonio Estrada Jr. | 
|-- | ----------------------- | 
|   | Antonio Estrada Jr.     | 
|   | Chief Financial Officer | 
|   | November 16, 2018       |
---

---

# EXHIBIT 13.1

|Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC§1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
of Matav-Cable Systems Media Ltd. (the Company) as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the
Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Amit Levin, Chief Executive Officer,
certify that:

1.
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2005

|/s/ Amit Levin
Amit LevinChief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# C_2005117EN.01002901.xml

| 19.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/29

---

Amendment to the notice of invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries

(2005/C 117/10)

(Official Journal of the European Union, C 22 of 27 January 2005)

(Official Journal of the European Union, C 22 of 27 January 2005)

Page 19, the text of point 2, under heading I ‘Subject’, reads as follows:

‘The total quantity in respect of which there may be fixed a maximum export refund as provided in Article 4(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 (1), is approximately 4 000 000 tonnes.’.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

1

---