alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005019EN.01000702.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-85/04: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/17/EC - Reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 19/13)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-85/04: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 23 February 2004, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and P. Léouffre) against French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and O. Christmann) – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting as President of the Fourth Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 84 of 3.4.2004.

1

---
...re • ••• ••••••• •

•••• ••• ••••••••

...•n•••

e/././MMMIM///////,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,e 1 ,1 0/

/ 11111/111111 N C/T

CAPY 1-1 7

cpspi/ -14f62 ets /Ai

Dscsaiber 1962 

/

1 Page /

llgartimaiti //

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION /31V //

/

EXTENDED CAPABILITY OF THE /

KH-4 CAMERA SYSTEM

Handle Via TALENT - KEYHOLE Control Only

WARNING

This itheitheth seatethe iefearciee effeettho Ike estiowel security el the Limed Steeill *Ohio the

sethertho of the ospisibeip tows U. S. Cole Title 1$ Sectithe TIM sod 794. The low prehiSits ill mouthiesith

er the rouolocee si IN eetheete is they .ss.s, N es remeetherleoil 'meth es well es Its too is eery meow

poorilithel et the eolety sr thieves, el the Wised Stites or ley the benefit of soy foreign oevernereet to the

d*Willel" Of die (WNW Steles. It isle be eves sail terthesthel espesielly 10datitille11111 end turtfretised le

receive TALENTAITHOLE iefeemetieci. he theerity most he theisttheed iw eseeedenth with KEYHOLE end

TALENT crouleththe.

NATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC I NTERPRETATION CENTER

Argraiffairastammaim WM.

ItalEILIIIIIMIENINNNIM/M Miry

4.nn?ur,
:WM', 1 1 3 -14 :62

EXTENDED CAPABILITY OF THE KH-4 CAMERA SYSTEM

Capability of the Kt1-4 camera system has

been extended to include a -mono-mode' co

!meta the obtaining of photographe over certain

areas te.g., areas of marginal inierest, preJim...! heavy clqud cover, or duplicate coverage witr. a minimum expenditure of film. itus

:s accomplished by no: operating. one of the

panoramic cameras. Consequently. stereo coy.

erage will no: exist over these areas.

Opera:ton of the forward and aft cameras

w:11 be alternated in order to balance the consumption of film, this "mono-mode" will be

Um:J. either for a complete pass or fora section

of soli: passes.

I ilm titling will be identical to the

::1:r.g except for the addition of the

letter "M ' (mono-mode; or ' S" 0v:env-mode,

preceding the camera designation. For example:

Pa-- rr•!1be 11.14.• I en..ra W.-- ha I

tki Ills tt %ft :. •:;.•

133 1 St' Fun *41. ; :.n sz:

Frames •:11 continue to he numbered consecutively by pass; however, when the monomode is operated, there will be an unbalanced

number of frames for the forward versus

the aft camera.

'Inc stellar-index camera will operate only

when the forward panoramic camera operates,

either in stereo or mono-mode.

shwa, V..

TALIEWt.at THOLE

Com& 0.1.

-1-

TOP SECRET
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(M)


                                  AMENDMENT TO

                   AGREEMENT RELATING TO 1996 ANNUAL MEETING



     This Amendment is made as of March 12, 1997 by and among PS Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, PS Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Joseph
S. Pirinea;

     WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement (the "Parties") are parties to An
Agreement Relating to 1996 Annual Meeting (the "Agreement") dated as of May 19,
1996; and

     WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in the manner
hereinafter set forth;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree that Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of the
Agreement are hereby deleted and of no further force and effect and are hereby
replaced by the following provision:

          "2.2.  The Holdings Board shall be responsible for, and shall, explore
     alternatives for enhancing stockholder value, including, without
     limitation, alternatives that would enable the Applicable Company to make
     prudent distributions to stockholders in the future."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by each of the Parties
as of the date first above written.

PS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.                     JOSEPH S. PIRINEA
          -and-
PS GROUP, INC.
 
 
 
By:  /s/Charles E. Rickershauser, Jr.      By:  /s/Joseph S. Pirinea
     --------------------------------           ---------------------
     Charles E. Rickershauser, Jr.              Joseph S. Pirinea
     Chairman and Chief Executive
     Officer of both said companies
/170144Z ZEA •

ST

XXX= 4EA

THREE 4ERD SI; OPCL4

•

•

•

- •. 3 • .

1700262

463-6

7. • • • • '• -.

. •,..:". ..... ' -'' . '2 *- t t•-

_ . • • ' • . • . ••• .:t -

- .le ...• .

,.

.

a

1.1.

‘oil:

ma.-

• •

%, •

t. • ..

•

••

•

•

V HER alsciftma y ACT I O:IS HAVE SEC! TAKEN f•R AXE CONIMATED.

I S HEALIBC A DETAILED TECHNICAL REVIE: OF THE LITETIUES OF•ALL THE ValiCitfr

C07.:PC; %TS IHTHE SRV'S UTILIZED IJ BOTX pricsaml Aiu PROCAAMis THIS

rILL INCLUDE THE IDENTIFICATION OF ALL RECOVEkY MTV» CUIPOMENTSICNICH,

WS .SHOULD HAVE DEFINITELY SPECIFIED LIFE WIT} :HAT THEIR LIMITS at a :r:J:"

StiOUL:. 2:I A:3 THE .TECHNICAL VALIDATION/TEST BASIS THAT :HAS BEEN OR snomo'stvA.

USE T t OETERME THE LICITS. IT IS MY INTENTION THAT .4 SET OF STANBAAD MOM*

CATI14 FCC BOTH PROGRAM A AND PROSM 3 SRY'S 2E DEVELOPED FRI= THIS

RZVIE":4 PARTIBIPATIM 9Y VED 30TH•PROGRAN AMID - •

PROSRA7 8 INCLUDING THE I S BESPIO: THE IttatTin • * •

SETAIL SPECIFICATIONS Ar: • • dlobtle 0.1: IMO/0MM - I ETC 

TEM! AL DIRECTIVES AFTER MY APPROVAL, IN ACCORUNCE- ?AYH/THE peovisms.ocL,

Y.Y Din CTIVE OF 3 FES 1964, "OPERATIN2 AHD ENOMERISO OBJECTIVE:141R COR4ZAiw:

ORDER TO PE1MIT ALL PARTICIPANTS TO AXE APPROPRIATE-PREPARATIONS Fe% ME'

LIETIXt, I Ai'. ,SCW-OULING IT FOR 1 XARCH. CETAILS MAURO ACCATA ANDI.00ATISN'.

ILL PUT: SHORTLY. •

FOR DI=

IT IS

PRACTI

ASST 1:

VITH R

gE

THIS P.

SCIZT I

ES CHI

TO 11.

;ARO T

IATEL

0,21.V.1

3 'US

.. • 0 APR

OMAN 8 FRO:4 489- ONX:.

THAT I OE PROVIDED Ci•4.4...rft ADIEU Of THE tiliCSOTAIMPAW3.

LEO TO PE INCLOSIGH 37 OUT G. SPEC tfAIONEWS 01-711111kr1,-::1!"

SSION1017.

THE STATEgEnTS IN PAUGAAPH THdE AUD 81X 011iltjactDVIIE: .t t :

HAT SPECIFIC STEPS HAVE 3E.Sh TAKEH TO AVOID A or. \=4-

THEIR INCLUSION,,AM5 

3.1 TO DETER:4 E: r•A•1:

EMI:SU:LE Fal THE IMCLUSI0.1 OF THE OUT OF SP= CONPOIIENTS, '

•

-

: •

, •

CF::: 2 63-i D CS) DMX0 SPEC.MV'S 1017 THBEE

APPROV n DIStiPLINA3Y MV'S PROGRAM A !WARM

V.ARCii ACE."n•21 SHORTLY

1:

a

•

201111111116411 RESPONSI/LE,

ccur.:t 3. 17.8 inf . • •

.,

. •

: •te

„ ,v,.- •-tyAr4. ti

s

• • • ••••• • •P ••n

•
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.Name:

William C. Wiedel, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


February 9, 2010
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02240**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02240\02240_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02240\02240_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02240\02240_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02240\02240_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02240\02240_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02240\02240_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02240\02240_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02240\02240_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02240\Certification Statement Plant ID 02240.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02240\Old Checklists\02240_Checklist.XLS Copy of EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 

### 02240\Old Checklists\02240_Checklist.xlsx Copy of EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02240\Supplemental Documents\02240_VMEU-Down-Aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02240\Supplemental Documents\02240_VMEU-Down-WB-Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Opinion issued August 9 , 20 22

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00 298
- CR

——————————— ANTHONY CONWAY , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 2 30 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1 634362

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Anthony Conway , pleaded guilty to the felony offense of murder

. 1 The trial court found appellant guilty, and, i n accordance with the terms of

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE § 19.02

.2

a ppellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 35 years in jail

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’ s permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. art. 44.02; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been m ade part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (d). Here, the trial court’ s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id

. T he trial court ’s certification states t hat this is a p lea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’ s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal , we must dismiss this appeal

. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a p rohibited appeal without further action, regardl ess of the basis for the appeal.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.3 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower

. Do not p ublish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
# ORIGIN

DAVID GLENN BETTENCOURT Attorney at Law- Hawai'i Bar No. 970 Suite 304 DillinghamTransportationBldg. 735 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 Telephone: (808) 521-3491 Facsimile: (808) 521-7749 Email: airlaw@pixi.com Attorneyfor OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC. 

# RECEIVED
OCT 06 

### 2014 HEARING DOCKET 

# JO l

# Li

- 0 Co 

# gI

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARING WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of: ) FAA Case No. 2014WP910016 ) OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, ) REQUEST FOR HEARING; INC ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ) ) REQUEST FOR HEARING COMES NOW OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC, by and through its designated agent and legal counsel, DAVID GLENN BETTENCOURT, and respectfully requests a hearinginthis proceeding pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.16(g)(2)(ii), of the FINAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY, served 18 September 2014 DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, 29 September 2014.



# i)~&vJL

. ID GLENN BETTENCOURT Attorney for OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARING WASHINGTON, D.C. Inthe Matter of: ) FAA Case No. 2014WP910016 ) OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE INC ) ) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that onthe date set forthbelow, copies ofthe foregoing were duly served as setforthbelow: Certified Mail TO: Federal Aviation Administration ( ) Attention: HearingDocket

**Cler~** AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2W1000 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 (Original+ 3 copies) Federal Aviation Administration ( ) Office ofRegional Counsel- ANM-7 Northwest MountainRegion 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, Washington First Class Mail (XX)

(XX)



### DA'JED, 

### Honolulu, Hawilli,

**2~bec** 

### 2014 

# ,(Jf(&(
ID GLENN BETTENCOURT Attorney for OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC.

2
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation Pipeline (Code 430) 

A pipeline and appurtenances installed to convey water for

storage or application as part of an irrigation water system. 

Practice Information 

A properly designed and installed irrigation pipeline will

convey water to an irrigation system or storage location in a

way that minimizes water loss. For some systems it may be

possible to reduce energy use or even create energy

through the development of a renewable energy system

such as in-line hydropower. 

An irrigation pipeline can be made of flexible conduit materials, such as plastic, steel, aluminum,

corrugated metal, or ductile iron pipe, or it can be made from rigid conduit, such as concrete or plastic

mortar pipe. The pipeline can be installed underground or above ground. 

Appurtenances used with an irrigation pipeline may include pressure reducers, inlets, check valves,

backflow prevention devices, surge tanks, air chambers, and pressure relief valves. Air relief valves

and vents can also be used. Corrosion protection may be needed depending on the metals used and

the soils on the site. 

An irrigation pipeline has a minimum expected life of 20 years. Operation and maintenance

requirements for the practice will depend upon the complexity of the irrigation pipeline system and the

type of pipe material chosen by the producer. Routine maintenance will be needed to ensure the

pipepline and all its components operate and designed. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Irrigation Pipeline (Code 430) is commonly applied

with CPSs such as Irrigation System, Microirrigation (Code 441) or Sprinkler System (Code 442).

Conveyance of water from installed CPSs Irrigation Reservoir (Code 436) or Irrigation System,

Tailwater Recovery (Code 447) is also a use of this practice. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Subject: In support of Makani Kai I Schuman Aviation Kamuela/Waimea BI service 

My name is Skip Schuman and I am Richard Schuman's brother, the owner of Schuman Aviation airline and helicopter 

business. My wife Taryn and I own property on the Big Island and I am a certified horse show judge and livestock 

auctioneer which I do as hobbies. I frequent Waimea to judge horse shows for the Big island Cutting Club, the Hawaii 

High School Rodeo Association and I have been the livestock auctioneer at the UofH Mealani Experiment station 4-H 

auction for many years. I frequent the Big Island 6-7 times per year and I would like to have the Waimea/Kamuela 

service route as an alternative to driving to Kana or Hila. Please consider Schuman Aviation in your transportation 

decisions for the future for service to Kamuela/Waimea, Big Island of Hawaii. Thank you. 

Michael E. "S~ip" Schuman (B) CCIM CPM 

Director of Industrial Services Group 

BISHOP STREET COMMERCIAL, LLC 

;' •· .) 

,.:::;] 

841 Bishop Street, Suite 808 

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 

Cell: (808) 927-3470 

Facsimile: (808) 237-5179 

E-Mail: SSchuman@BishopSC.com 

Web Site: www.BishopSC.com 

Disclaimer: Bishop Street Commercial. LLC accepts no liability for the content of this email. or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the 

information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing. copying. 

distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. 

Jj Please consider tho: environment before printing this .:-mail. 

1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40713

Conference Calendar

 

VERNON KING, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

T. H. WARREN, Etc., ET AL.,

Defendants,

T. H. WARREN, CAPTAIN, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL

CAPACITY; MICHAEL A. WILSON, WARDEN, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY

AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; D. K. BEVINS, WARDEN, MICHAEL UNIT

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; F. M. TURNER, NURSE,

MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; D. L. HAYES,

COMMANDING OFFICER, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL

CAPACITY;; S. STEVEN SUB COUNSEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL

CAPACITY; D. CARROLL, SUB COUNSEL, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND

IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CV-389

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 In a prior appeal, this court determined that Texas prisoner

Vernon King, Jr., No. 590316, is BARRED from proceeding in forma

pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 
No. 97-40713

-2-

(PLRA) because, on at least three prior occasions while

incarcerated, King has brought an action or appeal in a United

States court that was dismissed as frivolous. King v. Walker,

No. 97-40830 (5th Cir. February 10, 1998); see 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir.

1996). Accordingly, King’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED. He may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED. 

 King has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. 

 IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1995-2
$ 247,582,941.13 5.80% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1996

<TABLE>
                Annual Report-Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1995-2

<CAPTION>

               May-96    Jun-96    Jul-96    Aug-96    Sep-96    Oct-96    Nov-96    Dec-96
<S>         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>                 
Dist of Prin        0         0         0         0         0         0         0         0

Dist of Int         0   396,383   914,729   914,729   914,729   914,729   914,729   914,729

Serv Fee            0   114,207   110,750   113,037   111,948   110,762   111,681   107,915

Trustee Fee         0       167       167       167       167       167       167       167

Net Losses          0         0    15,425         0   101,581   414,687   412,615   570,788

Net Loss %       0.00%     0.00%     0.12%     0.00%     0.79%     3.24%     3.23%     4.46%

Delinquencies:
30+ Delq.   1,240,726 1,451,124 2,731,975 3,385,227 3,651,591 4,292,539 4,416,459 5,753,240

Delq. %          0.82%     0.98%     1.87%     2.35%     2.59%     3.12%     3.29%     4.40%

</TABLE>

                                  Page 6
 <PAGE>
# C_2004273EN.01002601.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/26

---

Action brought on 27 September 2004 by the European Parliament against the Council of the European Union

(Case C-414/04)

(2004/C 273/47)

An action against the against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 September 2004 by the European Parliament, represented by A. Baas and U. Rösslein, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The European Parliament claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 of 28 June 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date of application of certain provisions to Slovenia (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/2004 of 28 June 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date of application of certain provisions to Slovenia (1);

1

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Article 57 of the 2003 Act of Accession is not the appropriate legal basis for the adoption of the contested regulation. The purpose of that provision is to adapt the Community legislation to the accession and to make Community acts which have not been adapted by the act of accession itself applicable to the new Member States. Accordingly, other amendments cannot be based on Article 57 of the Act. That provision cannot be used to introduce derogations from Community acts.

The disputed regulation does not contain a sufficient statement of reasons, since the use of Article 57 of the 2003 Act of Accession as a legal basis is not sufficiently clear from the recitals and other provisions of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ L 233 of 2.7.2004, p. 3.

1

---