alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   14,100
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           196,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        251,500
<PP&E>                                                1,503,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                          736,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,277,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1,102,550
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                              7,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,277,000
<SALES>                                                 354,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        354,400
<CGS>                                                   270,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           323,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       24,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             500
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         500
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                500
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0








</TABLE>
Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101950 -.--...m v .. v .... I 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

HANDLE YIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR 27 March 1967 

HANDLE YIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSnM 

TO: CHIEF, SSC/CIA 

SUBJECT: Industrial Byeman Security Manual 

I have attached a memorandum of understanding between 

SAFSP and NASA/MSC, Houston related to project Upward 

activity at the latter facility and which is intended to 

provide security guidance related to SAFSP covert contractor 

and NASA/MSC interface. The memorandum includes a security 

gUide which uses terminology such as 1iSecret/Special Handling" 

and "Top Secret/Special Handling" where the security guide 

to the basic CIA-DOD-NASA agreement would precribe VlTop 

.Secret/Byeman/Special Clearance ReqUired." 

As a result of this arrangement, there are presently 

two systems of security: (1) Byeman and (2) Special Handling 

(Byeman equivalent) operative within NASA related to the same 

subject matter (project Upward). It is my opinion that this 

situation could result in a great deal of confusion and 

considerable likelihood 'of serious security compromise unless 

it is monitored very closely. 

Colonel Worthman~ Deputy Director of NRO Staff for 

Plans, Policy and Programs, has suggested that this and 

similar situations might be corrected by the preparation of 

an' Industrial Byeman Security Manual, has suggested that I 

take the initiative in this matter and has offered his 

assistance. Whereas we have in the past scrupulously avoided 

reference to the Byeman terminology and certain other elements 

of the system within the industrial community, I am inclined 

at this juncture, however~ to agree with Colonel Worthman to 

the extent that some of our earlier concepts might well stand 

re-examination at this time. 

Therefore 1 if you agree I would propose a meeting to 

include representatives of the SSC/CIA, Security Officers from 

DD/S&T and SAFSP and Colonel Worthman and myself from the NRO 

Staff to explore the feasibility of promulgating an Industrial 

Byeman Security Manual. 

Attachment: 

As stated 

cc: Col Ford, SAFSP 

Mr. Murphy, CIA/DDS&T Staff 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101950 

/3'.1£ -52217~ ("7 CDNTRO{H'O ___ -r __ _ 

cOpy ',..{'- or (.~ COPltS 

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 

.....
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-20-00777-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2019-57418

Style:

Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve, Inc. and Dallas Paskell, Turner Jones, Lawrence 

Kuykendall and Melida Jones

v. William Ciarlone

Date motion filed: August 9, 2022

Type of motion: Motion to Extend Word Limit for Response to Motion for Rehearing En Banc

Party filing motion: Appellee William Ciarlone

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

Other: 

Should appellants Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve, Inc. and Dallas Paskell, Turner Jones, Lawrence 

Kuykendall, and Melida Jones choose to file a reply to the motion for rehearing en banc, the reply may 

contain an additional 1,000 words. 

Judge's signature: /s/ Peter Kelly 

 Acting individually 

Date: August 11, 2022
# C_2005019EN.01003101.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/31

---

Action brought on 13 October 2004 by French Republic against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-427/04)

(2005/C 19/65)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 October 2004 by the French Republic, represented by its Agents Ronny Abraham, Géraud de Bergues and Stéphanie Ramet, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in its entirety Commission Decision No C(2004)361 of 2 August 2004 concerning State aid paid by France to France Télécom; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety Commission Decision No C(2004)361 of 2 August 2004 concerning State aid paid by France to France Télécom;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The contested decision in this case held that the business tax regime applying to France Télécom (FT) between January 1994 and December 2002 constituted State aid which was incompatible with the common market.

In support of its claims, the applicant argues, first, that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment and an error of law. In that regard, it challenges the Commission's analysis of the tax regime applying to FT under Law No 90-568 of 2 July 1990 on the organisation of the French Postal Service and France Télécom. This had led the Commission to treat the levy paid by FT between 1991 and 1993 as being of a mixed character, whereas it was purely fiscal in nature and to take the view that FT had been subject to two separate tax regimes between 1991 and 2002, whereas there had been a single regime, divided into two periods. The defendant should accordingly have applied an offset in respect of the 1991-2002 period.

The applicant also claims infringement of Article 15 of Regulation No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, inasmuch as the Commission should have held that there had been a period of ten years between the day when the alleged aid had been granted, 2 July 1990, being the date on which Law No 90-568 completely and definitively established the tax regime in question, and the first request for information from the defendant on 28 June 2001.

The applicant also relies on the principle of legitimate expectations, in that the contested decision requires the recovery of aid from FT, and of its own rights of defence, in that the Commission made a finding as to the existence of aid without having given the French authorities the opportunity of commenting on an essential element of its arguments, namely the mixed character of the levy paid by FT between 1991 and 1993.

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
                      XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996
 
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          1997         1996
                                                                       ----------   -----------
<S>                                                                    <C>          <C>
Net Income (Loss)....................................................  $  852,349   $(1,532,677)
Reconciliation of average number of shares outstanding to amount used
  in net income (loss) per share computation:
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding...................   9,948,607     8,320,392
     Assumed exercise of stock options...............................   2,157,717            --
                                                                       ----------     ---------
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding, as adjusted......  12,106,324     8,320,392
Net Income (Loss) Per Share..........................................  $     0.07   $     (0.18)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, the
general partner of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership, hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-K of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.



/s/ Thomas H. Lowder
----------------------
    Thomas H. Lowder
    Chief Executive Officer
    March 28, 2003










<PAGE>



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, the
general partner of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership hereby certifies that, to
his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-K of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.






/s/ Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
-------------------------
    Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
    Chief Financial Officer
    March 28, 2003
#### WILLIAM CLARKE v. D. M. WAGNER and others.

*JEjectment — Natural Boundaries*— *Conflict of in Grant.*

Although natural boundaries control course and distance and require a straight line from one corner to another, yet where the grant has such other description by natural boundaries (as the boundary of an island) as to require a departure from a straight line, the latter will control.

Civil AciioN to recover possession of Real Estate, tried at Eall Term, 1876, of IREdell Superior Court, before *Bux-ton, J.*

The facts are stated in *Clarke*v. *Wagner,*74 N. C. 791.

Verdict and judgment for defendants.- Appeal by plaintiff.

*Messrs. M. L. MeCorhle*and *R. F.*Armfield, for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Scott ‡. Caldwell,*for defendants.

PeaRSON, C. J.

This case was before us at January Term, 1876, reported in 74 N. C. 791. The reporter sets out a correct and well engraved plat of the localities,'material to the question of boundary, presented in the case.

*464The finding of the jury, that Island No. 1 was *the*Island nailed for in the Houston grant, is decisive of the ease.

The upper end of the Island is the beginning corner. The-lower end of the Island is the second corner. The “course- and distance'"’ in the grant from the “upper end of the Island to the lower end,” do not hit the lower end of the Island, and is out of the case. We suppose that circumstance was-allowed due weight by the jury as to Island No. i and Island No. 2. The corner of the upper end of the Island which is fixed by the verdict t@ be Island No. 1, and the-corner at the lower end of the Island, are natural boundaries-which control course and distance and require a straight line from the one corner to the other even though it splits Island No. 1, unless t-liere be some other description by natural boundaries to control the straight line from the one corner to the other. But the grant has such other description by natural boundaries which requires a departure from a straight line, to-wit; “including two small Islands and to-fit in this description • the line from the upper end of the Island to the lower end thereof must be made to run from the upper end of Island No. 1, to the upper end' of Island No. 2 ; thence along its western margin to its lower end ; thence-a straight course to the lower end of Island No. 1 — a fixed natural boundary- — thence to the post oak corner, &c. • ’

The point made by the ast-ute counsel for tire plaintiff, that a straight line from the lower end of Island No. I, to the post oak corner is controlled by the “white oak” which is marked as “a fore and aft line tree,” has nothing to rest on, for this is not "a case of lappago. Both parties-claim to the true line of the Houston grant, and that being fixed, settles the controversy.

- Per CuRiam. Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8673-8674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 8674]]

amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Application (P01).
    Date: March 9, 2015.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
     Contact Person: Yong Gao, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 
#3G13B National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 
9823, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5048, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d7462636a236a6c624d636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e59c8a8b82cb82848aa58b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03214 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .



                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Parent                                                 Subsidiary
------                                                 ----------
<S>                                                    <C>

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                              U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd, a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                              Quakertown, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                              U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance Corporation, a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd.                               The Eaglebrook Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance Corporation                U.S. Plastic Lumber IP Corporation, a Delaware corporation

</TABLE>
# C_2004262EN.01002503.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Amtsgericht Dresden by order of 7 September 2004 in the insolvency proceedings against Volker Donath

(Case C-387/04)

(2004/C 262/48)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Amtsgericht Dresden (Germany) of 7 September 2004, received at the Court Registry on 10 September 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the insolvency proceedings against Volker Donath on the following question:

Does the court of a Member State before which an application for the initiation of insolvency proceedings relating to a debtor's assets has been brought continue to have jurisdiction to decide whether to open insolvency proceedings even where, after lodging the application but before initiation of the proceedings, the debtor transfers the centre of his main interests to the territory of another Member State, or is jurisdiction transferred to the court of that other Member State?

---
# C_2005132EN.01002902.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/29

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 February 2005

in Case T-291/04 R, Enviro Tech Europe Ltd and Enviro Tech International, Inc., v Commission of the European Communities

(Interim measures - Directives 67/548/EEC and 2004/73/EC)

(2005/C 132/53)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-291/04 R: Enviro Tech Europe Ltd, established in Surrey (United Kingdom), and Enviro Tech International, Inc., established in Chicago, Illinois (United States), represented by C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: X. Lewis and D. Recchia, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for, first, suspension of the inclusion of n-propyl-bromide in Commission Directive 2004/73/EC of 29 April 2004, adapting to technical progress for the 29th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ 2004 L 152, p. 1) and, second, further interim measures — the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 10 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 16, 2010



/s/    RICHARD J.
MARTINRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.