67154 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 218 / Wednesday, November 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

meeting federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, these proposed actions: 

• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory 

action[s]’’ subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• are not economically significant 

regulatory actions based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• are not significant regulatory 

actions subject to Executive Order 

13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); 

• are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, and Particulate matter. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: November 3, 2014. 

V. Anne Heard, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26736 Filed 11–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0765; FRL–9918–62– 

Region 6] 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation 

of Authority to Arkansas 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to 

approve, through a ‘‘direct final’’ 

procedure, a request for delegation of 

the Federal air toxics program contained 

within 40 CFR Parts 63 pursuant to 

Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act). 

The State’s mechanism of delegation 

involves the straight delegation of 

certain existing and future Section 112 

standards unchanged from the Federal 

standards. The actual delegation of 

authority of individual standards, 

except standards addressed specifically 

in this action, will occur through a 

mechanism set forth in a memorandum 

of agreement (MOA) between the 

Arkansas Department of Environmental 

Quality (ADEQ) and EPA. ADEQ is 

requesting delegation and approval to 

implement and enforce the existing Part 

63 standards as they apply to Part 70 

sources, including major and area 

sources subject to the Title V (Part 70) 

permitting requirements. The delegation 

of authority under this action does not 

include CAA Section 112(r). 

DATES: Written comments on this 

proposed rule must be received on or 

before December 12, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section 

(6PD–R), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Comments 

may also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the Addresses section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Rick Barrett, (214) 665–7227, 

barrett.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving ADEQ’s 

request for delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce certain 

NESHAPs for all sources which are 

subject to part 70 as a direct rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as noncontroversial 

action and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for this 

proposed approval is set forth in the 

direct final rule. If no relevant, adverse 

comments are received in response to 

this action no further activity is 

contemplated. If EPA receives relevant, 

adverse comments, the direct final rule 

will be withdrawn and all public 

comments received will be addressed in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: October 14, 2014. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25947 Filed 11–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2013–0011; 

4500030114] 

RIN 1018–AZ44 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Designation of Critical 

Habitat for the Western Distinct 

Population Segment of the YellowBilled Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: On August 15, 2014, we, the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), 

announced a proposal to designate 

critical habitat for the western distinct 

population segment of the yellow-billed 

cuckoo under the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We now 

announce a reopening of the comment 

period for our August 15, 2014, 

proposed rule to allow for us to accept 

and consider additional public 

comments on the proposed rule. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

proposed rule published on August 15, 

2014 (79 FR 48548), is reopened. We 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS