alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Zhen Liu, Beijing, China, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1738 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 17, 2019, and upon reading the October 31, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Rogers], 173 AD3d 1427, 1428 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.
#### Chain Belt Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Otjen & Otjen*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general; Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, *Kenneth P. Grubb*and *Jefferson D. Burrus*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on March 5, 1935.
Order entered June 20 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 12 - 00125 - CR JOSHUA JUAREZ , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F11 - 00551 - X 

### O RDER On June 5, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court cos ts, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On June 14, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record. However, the detail itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply with the Texas Code of Crimi nal Procedure. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. arts. 103.001, 103.006 (West 2006). Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within seven days of the date of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed it emization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Codeof Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with the cost until a written bill is produced or is r eady to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost .”) (emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed) (emphasis added).

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL PRESIDING JUSTICE
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112027Lif' COPY 

• u• ..»LunL. 11 un nu 

p...... r.,,rl'..,,,--i 

HANDLE VIA /{,{,,' 

BY AN rn CONTROL svstui' 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, o.c. IIHllllllllllllllUllllllll~llfflllMlllllllllllll\11111111~11 14 000649690 

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR 

August 1, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Luncheon Meeting with BOB Representatives 

Harry Davis and I had lunch with 

Mr. James W. Clark 

Mr. C. William Fischer 

Mr. Charles A. Sorrels 

of the Bureau of the Budget today. They discussed a 

number of issues which they wished to raise at the 

August 1969 Executive Committ_ee meetings. They also 

expressed the view that they would like to present 

cases informally to the NRO Staff. The Staff would 

then comment on the validity of the BOB positions. 

It was agreed that Mr. Sorrels would send me 

draft issue papers for comment. 

Copies for: 

Dr. McLucas · 

Mr. Davis 

Col. Allen 

&f. r-:t 

F. Robert; Naka 

Uimrr1i1 111111 II ff~ 1(11111111111111111111111111111111 HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIV£ 5200.10 00£$ NO~ APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112027 

cowzoL NO BYE:;;:T3U6'1::0'9 

co.f l,t)(!_. or___, __ COPIU 

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>          0001004539
<NAME>         AIRPLANES LIMITED
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   224
<PP&E>                                           4,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              216
<BONDS>                                          3,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,269)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,149
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   123
<CGS>                                                2
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       57
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (46)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (46)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (46)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
m ·: J l I I 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112438 - ' 

DIR ,'OR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGIN, i!NG 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301 

1111111111111111111111 HIii ll111111111111111111111111111111111111 , 14 000643170 

Dear Homer: 

The Survey Applications Coordinating Committee will soon 

have two vacancies in the Department of Defense membership: 

Colonel Lew Allen, who has been transferred to the position of 

Director, National Reconnaissance Office Staff, and Colonel 

Paul Worthman, who is being retired by the Air Force. 

I understand that Nevin Palley and David Williamson, our 

Executive Coordinators on the Manned Space Flight Policy 

Committee, have had discussions regarding the possibility of 

reducing the membership of SACC to two representatives each 

from NASA and the DOD and generally agree that this is a good 

idea. Following their suggestion, I plan to assign only one new 

member to SACC: Lt Colonel William R. Yost, who is the 

Deputy Director for Plans and Policy of the NRO Staff. This 

would make our new DOD membership Nevin Palley and 

Lt Colonel Yost. 

Sincerely, 

John S. Foster, Jr. 

1ffll11 l l lli I I II II I 11 ITI 111111111111111 II I I II I II I II I I I I I I II 

Copy to:, Col Worthman 

HMrntE vrn BY 

CONTROL SYSTEi.i SECRET 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112438 

:. -- f3 ·~ 6 9 

.t?t?;-l __ l:~ C: t'
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 5, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

                    1.                     *Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Mount Pleasant, Texas; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Texas Leadership Bank, Royse City, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 3, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02380 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| (1)   | The      Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2008, fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-K report for the year ended December      31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings      Corp. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                              |   /s/   Mark E.      Schwarz |   | Date: | March 28,  2008   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------|-----------------------------|
| Mark      E. Schwarz             |                                                  |   |
| Principal      Executive Officer |                                                  |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GUY CARMICHAEL CRENSHAW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-96-47, CA-99-424-7)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Carmichael Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Guy Carmichael Crenshaw appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for relief filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(1994), and his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Crenshaw, Nos. CR-96-47; CA-99-424-7 (W.D.

Va. Nov. 21 & Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G.
Elkins, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/  DAVID G. ELKINS
----------------------------------------
(David G. Elkins)
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:   December 13, 2002



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
•

IDA-D1- 322

11 September ms,

TEN UM OF COIOR /11 AERIAL RECOMULISSANCE

By: J. S. Ooldhammer

fr

Advanced Research Projects Division, Institute for Defense Ana1yses

Under Contract - to the Advanced Research Projects Agency

Contract No. SD-50

Cow Re.

UNCLASSIFIED WM ATZACIMENTS

ARE MACRO

SECRET

. •••• • •---

•"•"'"r""

• • '•

•.,T

*,:r
•

ID.A-DI-122

TES UMW OF COLOR IN AERIAL RICORMAISSANCE

Color films of high fidelity or of laacnra color imbalances so

that actual colors can be detendned, are useful for a nniber of

reconnaissance applications. Among those in which color has been

successfully employed are the foLlowing:

I. Underwater depth deteregnation at beaches.

Classification of raw material stockpiles (ores, coal, lime.,

stone, etc4

Classification of vegetation to establish soil condition,

drainage, load bearing characteristiCs, trafficability, etc.

44 Identification of chemical process plants by smoke and/or

effluvient liquid color.

3. Crop yield estdmates by foliage color at appropriate times

In the growth cycle.

a..

•••,' 4 ,• '•• • •4.144.

;

/47/MW/7/7//7/77/1/./..wwm,--,„,,,,,,//7 /7/

...,zeze47•W

SECRET

•

•• • • ••••• • • •••• +."••/••s• n•••:. •:11111r.erner•••11
_ •

-. •

y1

d"///Z,Zze,:e./Zer

CONCLUSIONS

Color films are not of value in this situation.

Panchromatic-near infrared simultaneous exposures amy prove

useful. However, considerable additional optical and camera complidation is necessary, and the panchromatic image, by virtue of light losses

and image degradations introduced by the bean-splitter will not be as

good as if no attempt were made to make the infrared exposure. The

technique is equally applicable to readout and recovery systems.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         5,181
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         475,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 68,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        253,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,168
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,806
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,134 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (460)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .42

<FN> 
Depreciation and amortization.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1929 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1929

To increase the maximum amount of increased cost of compliance coverage 
  available under the National Flood Insurance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

  Mr. Crist introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the maximum amount of increased cost of compliance coverage 
  available under the National Flood Insurance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Homeowners to Mitigate 
Flood Damage Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED COST OF COMPLIANCE COVERAGE.

    Section 1304(b) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. 4011(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 
        through (D) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively;
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively;
            (3) by inserting before ``The national flood insurance 
        program'' the following: ``(1) In general.--'';
            (4) by striking ``The Administrator'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(2) Premium.--The Administrator''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
    ``(3) Amount of Coverage.--Each policy for flood insurance coverage 
made available under this title shall provide coverage under this 
subsection having an aggregate liability for any single property of 
$60,000.
    ``(4) Treatment of Coverage Limits.--Any amount of coverage for a 
property provided pursuant to this subsection shall not be considered 
or counted for purposes of any limitation on coverage applicable to 
such property under section 1306(b) (42 U.S.C. 4013(b)).''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

TL/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICIO GABRIEL BUENO DE

MIRANDA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74373

Agency No. A098-807-287

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mauricio Gabriel Bueno de Miranda, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s order denying his application for adjustment of status. We

FILED

FEB 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
TL/Research 2 07-74373

have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of

law. Mielewczyk v. Holder, 575 F.3d 992, 994 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the

petition for review.

Bueno de Miranda’s conviction for violating Cal. Health & Safety Code

§ 11352(a) renders him removable as charged under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i)

and ineligible for adjustment of status as an inadmissible alien under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II). See Mielewczyk, 575 F.3d at 995-98.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.