alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 665/2006

of 28 April 2006         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 May 2006         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 1 May 2006

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 17.4.2006-27.4.2006         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 16,67 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 20,41 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

----
1 

OAR Box 1168 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

94) ll-C-23 

Docket Number: 

A-89-10 

Printed 4/29/2008 11:23:20 AM Sheet 94 of 131 

p.1 
P.2 

^ t o sr«, 

Km 

A-89-10 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIO 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Stand. 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

II-C-2 3 

May 31, 1990 

DEJJJ11 

FEBI^Bi 

c.PAA!R DOCKET 

Dear Reg Neg Committee Member: 

Please find enclosed the two bar charts for flanges inadvertently left 

out of the May 30, 1990, transmittal. We are sorry for any inconvenience. 

Sincerely, 

/U^4. ^rtZ*-*. 

Rick Colyer 

Standards Development Branch 
BD/EO Flanges 

Percent Leakers at 500 ppm 

10 

8 -

CO 

<5 

CO 6 

C 

CD 4 

O 

CD 

Q. 

2 -

- 70 

_______________ 

— ^H 

- ^H 

135 

'Wu 

"*_____• 

i^^^^H 

408 

si^^^H 

146 

63 

158 

i 

158 

.. -jf2* - • -Q47-147 

117 150 

( 

181 

137 f T 328 

bd4 bd8 eo9 eo6 eo3 bd10 eo8 eo4 bd5 bd11 eo2 bd3 bd12 bd7 bd1 eo1 eo7 

Unit 
24-Unit Study - Flanges 

Percent Leakers at $00 ppm 

25 

20 -

CJ 

<5 

__* 

CO 1 5 

CD 

CD 1 0 

o 

CD 

Q . 

5 -

22 28 4 2 11 12 6 31 5 3 20 29 61 

Unit 

1|54 [9 $7 49 1|76 1-83 385 

66 60 64 62 32 21 33 35 34 

j*»
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Georges Benarroch, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gilla Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequentto the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Date: August 2, 2007         By:  /s/ Georges Benarroch    Georges Benarroch    Acting President & Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Intelligent Systems Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies to his or her knowledge that the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2005                      /s/ J. Leland Strange
                                        ------------------------------
                                            J. Leland Strange
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ Bonnie L. Herron
                                        ------------------------------
                                            Bonnie L. Herron
                                            Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified
Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 10, 2005



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. Plamann President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0429

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MATTHEW LYMAN TIPPETS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Donald L. Harris, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2022

03/30/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0429
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Edgar Filing


EXHIBIT 10.2




Options Media Group Holdings, Inc.

240 Old Federal Highway, Suite 100

Hallandale, FL 33009




August 6, 2008




Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. 

240 Old Federal Highway, Suite 100

Hallandale, FL 33009

Attention: Mr. Scott Frohman, Chief Executive Officer




Dear Mr. Frohman: 




This letter acknowledges that there was a scrivener’s error in your employment agreement dated June 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”) in which the number of options and shares of common stock were reversed.   In order to fix this error, Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. has agreed to modify Section 4(e) of the Agreement to reflect the following:




4. 

Compensation of Executive.




(e) Upon the execution hereof, the Corporation shall grant the Executive (i) 2,250,000 shares of restricted common stock under the Corporation’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) that shall not be subject to any vesting period and (ii) options to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (“Options”) under the Plan.  The per share exercise price of the Options shall be $0.30, which represents the fair market value per share of the Corporation’s common stock on the date of grant.  The term of the Option shall be ten years from the date of grant.  One twenty-fourth (4.167%) of the Options shall vest on each monthly anniversary of the date of grant. 




In all other respects, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed.  Please sign a copy of this letter agreement and return it to me.  




		
	 
	Very truly yours,


	 
	 

	 
	/s/ ADAM WASSERMAN


	 
	Adam Wasserman


	 
	Chief Financial Officer







AGREED AND ACCEPTED:




		
	/s/ SCOTT FROHMAN

	 

	Scott Frohman

	 






cc:

Michael D. Harris, Esq. (Via Email)
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7091

ROBERT F. MALONEY

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in 05-2383, Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

Before BRYSON Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether

Robert F. Maloney should be directed to show cause why his appeal should not be

dismissed as untimely filed.

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in this

case on February 9, 2009. The docket sheet of the Court of Appeals for Veterans

Claims indicates that that court received Maloney's notice of appeal on April 24, 2009,

or 74 days after entry of judgment.

Any appeal of the judgment had to be received by the Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a);

28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). If the notice of appeal was untimely filed,

we do not have jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Bowles v. Russell,

551 U.S.	, 127 S.Ct. 2360 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case
is a jurisdictional requirement) • Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395

(Fed. Cir. 1983).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Maloney is directed to show cause, within 21 days of the date of filing of

this order, why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

The briefing schedule is stayed.

FOR THE COURT

JUN 11 2009

Date

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Jan Horbaly

Clerk U.S. COURT tglpEALS FOR

THE FED L CIRCUIT

cc:	Robert F. Maloney

Robert C. Bigler, Esq. JUN 1 1 2009

s20

ithcoriu

CLERK

2009-7091	 - 2 -
# C_2005132EN.01001802.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/18

---

Action brought on 5 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-156/05)

(2005/C 132/34)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 5 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Eleni Tserepa-Lacombe and Nicola Yerrell, of its Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt or, in any event, to notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/34/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt or, in any event, to notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/34/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| 2. | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the Directive into national law expired on 1 August 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 195, 1.8.2000, p. 41.

1

---
# C_2005057EN.01000501.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 20 January 2005

in Case C-302/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof): in the proceedings brought on behalf of Nils Laurin Effing (1)

1

(Family benefits - Grant by a Member State of advances on maintenance payments for minor children - Child of a prisoner - Conditions of granting the maintenance payment - Prisoner transferred to another Member State to serve his sentence - Article 12 EC - Articles 3 and 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71)

(2005/C 57/08)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-302/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), made by decision of 11 July 2002, received at the Court on 26 August 2002, in the proceedings brought on behalf of Nils Laurin Effing – the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, K. Lenaerts, S. von Bahr and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; J. Kokott Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 January 2005, in which it ruled:

In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, in which an employed person within the meaning of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1386/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001, has been transferred, as a prisoner, to the Member State from which he comes in order to serve the remainder of his sentence there, it is the legislation of that Member State which, in the area of family benefits and in accordance with the provisions of Article 13(2) of that regulation, is the applicable legislation. Neither the provisions of that regulation, particularly Article 3 thereof, nor Article 12 EC, preclude, in such a situation, the legislation of a Member State from making the grant of family benefits such as those provided for by the Österreichisches Bundesgesetz über die Gewährung von Vorschüssen auf den Unterhalt von Kindern (Unterhaltsvorschußgesetz) (Austrian Federal Law on the Grant of Advances for the Maintenance of Children) to the members of the family of such a Community national subject to the condition that he remain a prisoner in that State.

---

(1)  OJ C 305 of 07.12.2002.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10.85



March 8, 2001

Mark Newman
6603A Santa Isabel St.
Carlsbad, CA 92009

Re: Amendment to Severance Benefits Agreement


Dear Mark:

This amendment (the "Amendment") to the Severance Benefits Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated May 4, 2000 by and between EPIMMUNE INC. (the "Company"), and
MARK NEWMAN (the "Employee") is entered into as of March 8, 2001 (the "Amendment
Date").

1.      The Company agrees that the paragraph on page 3 of the Agreement which
formerly read:

        If, within 365 days following the occurrence of a Change in Control,
        your employment is involuntarily terminated without Cause or you
        voluntarily terminate your employment for Good Reason, then (1) within
        30 days of such termination you will receive a lump-sum payment equal to
        six months of base salary subject to any applicable withholding of
        federal, state or local taxes and (2) the vesting of any stock option
        for Company stock and the time during which such option may be exercised
        immediately will be accelerated as to 50% of the then unvested shares.

is hereby amended and restated as follows:

        If, within 365 days following the occurrence of a Change in Control,
        your employment is involuntarily terminated without Cause or you
        voluntarily terminate your employment for Good Reason, then (1) within
        30 days of such termination you will receive a lump-sum payment equal to
        twelve (12) months of your then current base salary subject to any
        applicable withholding of federal, state or local taxes and (2) the
        vesting of any stock option for Company stock and the time during which
        such option may be exercised immediately will be accelerated as to 100%
        of the then unvested shares, so that all such unvested shares will be
        immediately vested and exercisable as of the date of termination.

2.      Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

3.      This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of California.



                                        1

<PAGE>   2

4.      This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.


Very truly yours,



EPIMMUNE INC.

Robert De Vaere
Chief Financial Officer

Agreed and Accepted:

/s/ Mark Newman
----------------------------------
MARK NEWMAN



                                        2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                        28,940
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              55,210
<PP&E>                                        97,003
<DEPRECIATION>                               (15,845)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               139,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        494,309
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      12,545
<OTHER-SE>                                  (387,946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                (375,401)
<SALES>                                       85,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              85,594
<CGS>                                         24,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 24,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             391,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (328,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (328,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (328,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.03)
        

</TABLE>