alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005117EN.01000101.xml

| 19.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 May 2005

(2005/C 117/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2621 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4457 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68835 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2162 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5426 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,94 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0940 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5770 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,268 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1973 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 151 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,038 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7380 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6690 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5976 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8395 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7821 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0858 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 268,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1191 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4458 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 926,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,796 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,879 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,3530 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,326 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2621

JPY

Japanese yen

135,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4457

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68835

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2162

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5426

ISK

Iceland króna

82,94

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0940

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5770

CZK

Czech koruna

30,268

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1973

ROL

Romanian leu

36 151

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,038

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7380

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6690

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5976

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8395

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7821

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0858

KRW

South Korean won

1 268,66

ZAR

South African rand

8,1191

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4458

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 926,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,796

PHP

Philippine peso

68,879

RUB

Russian rouble

35,3530

THB

Thai baht

50,326

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005143EN.01003102.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/31

---

Removal from the register of Case C-516/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 143/59)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 8 April 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-516/04 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 05.02.2005.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFOFFICER

OF AMLCOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officerof AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

(a)           Thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           Informationcontained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006
| /s/ Heera Lee                |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| By: Heera Lee,               |
| Director of Finance and      |
| Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
```

                                                                                         Exhibit 23.1

                                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8
(files  no.  333-14741,   333-31521,  333-66219,  333-83645,  333-93141,  333-43034,  333-56730  and
333-72980)  of eXcelon  Corporation  of our reports  dated March 29, 2002  relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

April 29, 2002
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Operating Commercial Power Reactors and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update - Annual Report for Calendar Year 2019 (NUREG-1885, Revision 13)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 13 (PDF – 1.07 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2020**Date Published:** October 2020

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D.e of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210d(e)), as amended, which states, "[n]ot less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year." Additionally, Section 170D.a of the AEA of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210d(a)) grants the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) the authority to determine which licensed facilities must undergo these security evaluations. Due to the nature, form, and quantity of nuclear material, the NRC is reporting the security response evaluation results for the Nation's fleet of operating commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) and Category I (CAT I) fuel cycle facilities. To aid in understanding how the NRC regulates, the NRC is also providing a description of relevant security programs, including: the Reactor Oversight Process, the Security Baseline Inspection Program for NPPs, a force-on-force evaluation description, and the CAT I Fuel Cycle Facilities Security Oversight Program. This report also includes a comprehensive overview of the combined results of these security programs for calendar year calendar year 2019.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
              SUBSIDIARIES OF XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
     There follows a list of the subsidiaries of the Registrant, all wholly
owned:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                   JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
          -----------------------------------------------   -------------------------------
          <S>                                               <C>
          Xionics Holdings Limited                          United Kingdom
          Xionics International Limited                     United Kingdom
          Xionics Document Technologies GmbH                Germany
          Xionics Geschaftsfuhrungs GmbH                    Germany
          Xionics GmbH & Co. KG Software Consulting         Germany
          Xionics Inc.                                      Delaware
          Xionics Securities Corporation                    Massachusetts
          Seaport Imaging                                   California
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 26, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51523

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NOE ALEMAN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1509-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Noe Aleman, Jr. appeals his convictions for conspiracy,

harboring illegal aliens, and encouraging and inducing aliens to

remain in the United States. Aleman was sentenced to a term of

imprisonment of six months on each count to be followed by threeyear terms of supervised release, all terms to run concurrently. 

Aleman asserts that the Government failed to prove criminal

intent with respect to any of the three counts because he

believed, based on legal advice, that the three Mexican females

could remain in the United States legally beyond the date of the
No. 05-51523

-2-

temporary parole. Viewed in the light most favorable to the

verdict, the evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to find

beyond a reasonable doubt Aleman guilty of conspiracy, harboring

illegal aliens, and encouraging and inducing aliens to remain in

the United States. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319

(1979); 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii), (iv); 18 U.S.C. § 371.

The evidence that the aliens had single day parole (I-94

forms), that Aleman lied about turning in the forms when the

aliens returned to Mexico, that Aleman and his wife lied about

the aliens living in their home, that the aliens were in the

United States because they were regularly attending school, that

Aleman lied to border officials about the aliens’ location in

Mexico, and that Aleman repeatedly attempted to have additional

parole granted to allow the aliens to be in the United States

legally was sufficient for a rational jury to find beyond a

reasonable doubt that Aleman knew that the aliens were in the

United States illegally and to establish criminal intent with

respect to all of the three counts of conviction. The evidence

was sufficient to support Aleman’s convictions for conspiracy,

harboring illegal aliens, and encouraging and inducing aliens to

remain in the United States. 

AFFIRMED.
For your information, here is an updated

status on our NRO revised charter.

t Colonel, USAF

II

I.

11 •

•• •`••:. • •

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

4• MEMORANDUM

16 December 1974

NOTE FOR Ilk. PLUM ER

4111111111, • ' 1 HAN

0 CONTROL

TOP SEC L1

re
DATE:

SIGNATURE

APPROVAL

COMMENTS

COORDINATION

ACTION

Zienalle

TICKLER 

RETURN TO

FILE

ST ATVS OA NAO 

etmAreA. deev/JApAl

•

A/A 7/7/A/ .010 AT _._44 0.0,•P Ay"- ece-,40A. r

BY

COMMENTS/ DIRECTION :

RA •

--N-SECRET- 860-A1D-61'O-1A;NDLINEI---ONL-Y--

• ..org•s„

•

^:e;n44 •

•
.•

• .11 •

, -111-SECIET

S$ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

AIN

11.11111Pnli

THJINRO STAFF

'0

ji

i•

10 December 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Revised Charter

I have had informal conversation with both the IC Staff

and the ASD(I) Staff with regard to the status of our memo

which asked for approval, in principal, of the draft updated

agreement. The IC Staff has indicated to me that they would

prefer to wait until such time as the PFIAB Panel reports

out to the President before considering an updated agreement.

It was also indicated to me that in substance there was no

objection from the CIA or the IC Staff with the draft as

! presented. I plan to discuss this further with Dr. Stevens.

The ASD(I) Staff had prepared a concurring memorandum

for Secretary Schlesinger with a couple of reservations such

as the involvement of the NSC in NRO affairs. Based upon

the IC Staff position, however, they plan to withdraw their

input to Secretary Schlesinger.

The PFIAB Secretariat thinks that Dr. Baker will be

ready with his report around the first of February and they

are unaware of the precise approach he is taking. It is

expected, however, that no radical recommendation will be

made and that the NRO entity will be recommended for perpetua1 tion.

My opinion is that the draft agreement has been useful

to us for two reasons. First, it moderated the desire to

embellish the OMNIBUS NSCID with detailed references to

4 space reconnaissance and the NRO. Second, it has served

as a vehicle for obtaining general consensus that an agreement is an appropriate vehicle and that we need a new

agreement in the near future. Concurrent with this is

assunelle • pxyarr MON

OSOLOAL NOWAYLI OF

exicureve arum CATIF -^F^If 11L1111

0011V SRI OSCLONINFT CNi Oa DOT.

CONTROL NO Internal

COPY OF COPIES

paica _LOP _a__ PAGES
c oNT atm vs rr m

-TOP-SECIETthat some fundamental issues are being raised such as those

by General Allen which if resolved peacefully can serve to

strengthen the NRO's contribution to the national intelligence

business.

IRON L one ,

- PaNt lete

1044110.151 ruo

I al • 1 MM . •MAJII el n•••alb fain

WM. 11•1.0411.. • MM n

CON I NM NO Interagil

CON Y Of COP. S

PAC* 2 Og Z PAO!. S
Amendment of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 23, 2008


 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT OF SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment of Securities Purchase Agreement (this
“Amendment”) is dated as of September 23, 2008. It amends the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of September 15, 2008, between Cell Therapeutics, Inc. and Enable Growth Partners LP.

 1. In order to correct a clerical error, the definition of in Section 1.1 of the Agreement is amended to read in full as follows:

 “B Convertible Notes” means the Series B 10% Convertible Senior Notes of the Company to be issued under a
Trust Indenture between the Company and US Bank National Association as Trustee, and of like tenor as the Convertible Notes except for the issuance date being the Option Closing Date and the maturity date being the fourth anniversary of the Option
Closing Date. 
 2. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 

 

			
	CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ James A. Bianco, M.D.
		 	Name: James A. Bianco, M.D.
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer

  

			
	ENABLE GROWTH PARTNERS LP
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brendan O’Neil
		 	Name: Brendan O’Neil
		 	Title: President and Chief Investment Officer

  

			
	ENABLE OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS LP
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brendan O’Neil
		 	Name: Brendan O’Neil
		 	Title: President and Chief Investment Officer

  

			
	PIERCE DIVERSIFIED MASTER STRATEGY FUND LLC, ENA
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brendan O’Neil
		 	Name: Brendan O’Neil
		 	Title: President and Chief Investment Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP)(NUREG/BR-0524)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0524 (PDF - 3.28 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**November 2015

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

CSARP is an international program on severe accident phenomenological research and code development activities organized by the NRC since 1988. The objective of CSARP is the exchange of data and analyses on experimental and analytical research on severe accidents. The NRC coordinates CSARP activities with participation from more than 25 member nations that focus on the analysis of severe accidents and their consequences using state-of-the-art computer models. The NRC developed the MELCOR code for modeling accident progression, and the MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS) to evaluate offsite consequences from a hypothetical release of radioactive material into the atmosphere.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 560/2006

of 5 April 2006         

fixing the definitive rate of refund and the percentage of system B export licences to be issued in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(7) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For applications for system B export licences submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005 between 17 January and 16 March 2006, the percentages of licences to be issued and the rates of refund applicable are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 328, 15.12.2005, p. 54.

----

ANNEX

Percentages for the issuing of licences and rates of refund applicable to system B licences applied for between 17 January to 16 March 2006 (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

----
The professional 

mapping drone 

Technical specifications

The survey-grade 

mapping drone
Technical specifications

Weight (inc. supplied camera)

Wingspan

Material

Propulsion

GNSS/RTK receiver

Battery

Camera (supplied)

Carry case dimensions

Hardware

Operation

Approx. 0.73 kg (1.61 lb) 

96 cm (38 in)

EPP foam, carbon structure & composite parts

Electric pusher propeller, 160 W brushless DC motor

L1/L2, GPS & GLONASS

11.1 V, 2150 mAh

16 MP IXUS/ELPH

55 x 45 x 25 cm (21.6 x 17.7 x 9.8 in)

40 minutes 

40-90 km/h (11-25 m/s or 25-56 mph) 

Up to 3 km (1.86 miles) 

8 km2

 / 3 mi2 (at 974 m / 3,195 ft altitude AGL)

Up to 45 km/h (12m/s or 28 mph)

Down to 1.5 cm (0.6 in) per pixel

1-3x GSD

Down to 3 cm (1.2 in) / 5 cm (2 in)

Yes (inc. mid-air collision avoidance) 

Yes

Approx. 5 m (16.4 ft)

Maximum flight time

Nominal cruise speed

Radio link range

Maximum coverage (single flight)

Wind resistance

Ground Sampling Distance (GSD)

Relative orthomosaic/3D model accuracy

Absolute horizontal/vertical accuracy (no GCPs)

Multi-drone operation

Automatic 3D flight planning

Linear landing accuracy

Package contents

•	 eBee RTK foam body (inc. all electronics & built-in

autopilot) 

•	 Pair of detachable wings

•	 16 MP IXUS/ELPH still camera (inc. 16 GB SD card, battery, USB

cable & charger) 

•	 GNSS antenna

•	 2.4 GHz USB radio modem for data link (inc. USB cable)

•	 Two Lithium-Polymer battery packs & charger

•	 Spare propeller

•	 Carry case with foam protection

•	 Remote control & accessories (for safety pilots)

•	 User manual

•	 Software included: eMotion (flight planning & control) &

Postflight Terra 3D (professional photogrammetry)

For eBee RTK updates

subscribe to our newsletter at

www.sensefly.com
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-47851, 333-47843, 333-47059, and 333-46991) of
FlexiInternational Software, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1999, except
as to Note 13 which is as of February 26, 1999, appearing on page F-2 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page F-19 of
this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 19, 1999
Stamford, Connecticut
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999, AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,258
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  31,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                   640
<INVENTORY>                                    3,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,197
<PP&E>                                         63,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          936,572
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,944
<OTHER-SE>                                     (847,411)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,105
<SALES>                                        36,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,148
<CGS>                                          35,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               260,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (259,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (259,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (259,880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Accountants:

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
 Optika Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-56501 and 333-42250) on Form S-8 of Optika Inc. of our report dated January
19, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Optika Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss)
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
of Optika Inc.

                                                KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 4, 2004