alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TS3A158301104Z ZEA ZPO OPMN

.11

•• 18 56

SAFSS • . •

. •

.• I

F14 LNSC 2. EA

1 Jr. .. 4. . OCESS OF COMET ING RUM CanTR ACrNAL ACTION LITH LX3C FM SYSTEUS IIITECRATION OF TIZ CCNNIA SY?-tEt.1. IN OVER

I. TO ItiAkS. TiZ DOCUIZNTAT ION INITIATED OMER THIS CallhACT CA YPATISLE VITH EXIST 113 FRO:RAM A PROCEDURES. WE It:TDD TO MIAMI AN

. • AErtElfIATED SECLIITY AN:ZX TO THIS comma imr..1? IE SittILAR TO ' X

TI-7. TYPE OF SEC'.2 ITY AtOIX WHICH CE APPLY TO :11 C:.1 COVERT CON• . tS TRACTS. IN SL3STANCE, THIS AR:ZX VILL STATE CCR CM TF4T ALL EX'aFILS EECLR IT Y ROC:IMES, P02. IVES M. PRACT lirM 17111 SE . ktItUED

T: TIZGE ooc

, , 1:1.1. ' U:ZER •TH IS CSYSTEMS IN TEGR A I in COX-CRAM EXCLEIT ir..;:l oocczn HAI

T

to L. l :.

r--

;PROCECt s.

 CONTRACT :IPA EZ r41:1::

"'ESe VE TIVI sfe.r...;FY T ::I.T ALL DOCC..7%Te P.:: C 7 tli:3 U:OF2

CEPZLDIM UPOR CO;;E:34, ..13 gi: co tn;:ut...... A:3 TCP SEMEY Ca SE FUTIL-.11 CFECIFIE3 141- rsu. SE CONTRCLILE0 trz olf3 tal..:...-D ::: 4 : 'AL:. :2 S I ..: I. LT: TO TOP EEMET :••:CIDL1-e TRA=ISSt0; A:3 Cal:I:17. 1;.2.TRUCT Ian Ar:E ALSO li:CI.U5 2. Tr.:7 DETAILS OF THIS SYSTE;.: VC 1:::.:.t.

•K2...:::: TO r.Z.:ZERS OF YOU":

-.dal : r, •

:7V:4;a ' - .. "1":" . -. ^ RC:LITIES OR PREVIOUS OCCASI

3•

.:;.S:C PC. :CY 0 I2ECTLY TO TIC HEART OF k c1.-za ion misC:1 '.7E WAS DI SC: 14E TXis (tr D GU PREVIOUS OCCASIO;

C.-Z.:M. 11:3 P.:1:3L113 

.:ST 10:: I:MATES TO TIZ DIE FERCI1 ::::TNITS V.71.0YE FOR DOW D ,: csiv ! T. 1 *.:ST Et.11%;;EI: CC1 ..:;CCEfitr.Ese THIS F.-

. CIA PROCOMES ML OM Ma:NIG .:; F.n2LEU. EXCEPT

l.

VEZRE TEZEE T:70 SYSTENS;

el

::7Z TC•31:71-E

1:::.:.7. :CU IN A SttraLE FAZ::LITY SUCH AS A/Pit Ill A PRACT MAL SENSE, iw:: LICIRITY COrnIZANCE OF Tlir A/P9 042 ECM ITY AMEX TO' •r SYSTEUS En:GRAMM CONTRACT CAI:ZT --; _71.

":.: TLVCRX MESS YOU ACREE AM 1:: AL:TH7.1!ZE YOLR A/P SEVAITY REPRESENTATIVE TO HAVE T:f. CONT :.;.:.702 COV.PI.Y.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2024 ND 82

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Kyle Martin Heintz, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20230382

– 20230385

Appeal s from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.
Kathryn R. Jund, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Victoria J.M. Christian
, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students
, Grand Forks, N

. D
., for plaintiff and a ppellee; submitted on brief.
Kevin McCabe, Dickinson, N

. D
., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.1 State v. Heintz No s . 20230382

– 20230385

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Kyle Martin Heintz appeals from orders for revocation of probation entered in four criminal cases. He argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to continue the sentencing portion of his revocation proceedings. After review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denyi ng the motion to continue. We summarily affirm the orders for revocation of probation under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
## Feed Grains Database: Yearbook Tables

Note.Missing values indicate unreported values, discontinued series, or not yet released data.

Mkt year 1/ Qtr Beginning stocks Production Imports Total supply 2/ Food,

alcohol, and industrial use Only alcohol

for fuel % Used 2006 1,967.16 10,534.87 11.98 12,514.01 3,466.50 2,119.49 0.20 2007 1,303.65 13,073.89 18 14,395.54 4,315.45 3,000.00 0.23 2008 1,624.15 12,199.91 15 13,839.06 5,311.70 4,000.00 0.33 

## 0.16937 0.208398 0.289037 Data from cornusedforethanol file, custom queries from feed grains database on USDA website 2006 2119.49 2007 13038 3049.21 0.233871 2008 12101 3676.880.303849 2009 12921 4200 0.325052 2008 MY Sep-Aug Exports, market year Corn United States

Million bushels 1857.561 2009 MY Sep-Aug Exports, market year Corn United States

Million bushels 2050 2008 MY Sep-Aug Food, alcohol, and industrial use Corn United States

Million bushels4930.728 2009 MY Sep-Aug Food, alcohol, and industrial use Corn United States

Million bushels 5457.3 Sources: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Crop Production and Grain Stocks; USDA, World Agricultural Outlook Board, World Supply and Demand Estimates; and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Table 4--Corn: Marketing year supply and disappearance

Million bushels 

## 1/ September-August. Latest data may be preliminary

or projected. 2/ Totals may not add due to rounding.Seed use Feed and residual use % Used Total domestic use 2/ Exports % Used Total disappearan ce 2/ Ending

stocks 23.76 0.13011703 5,594.74 0.53 9,085.00 2,125.37 0.20 11,210.37 1,303.65 22.20.102314613 5,998.74 0.46 10,336.39 2,435.00 0.19 12,771.39 1,624.15 23.30.109427037 5,350.00 0.44 10,685.00 2,000.00 0.16 12,685.00 1,154.06 

## 0.447078 0.169839 0.416708 0.16915 0.386587 0.144518 Data from cornusedforethanol file, custom queries from feed grains database on USDA website 5913 0.45352 5254 0.434179 1857.561 0.153505 5400 0.417924 2050 0.158656 Sources: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Crop Production and Grain Stocks; USDA, World Agricultural Outlook Board, World Supply and Demand Estimates; and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Table 4--Corn: Marketing year supply and disappearance

Million bushels
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of


Charles & Colvard, Ltd.


Morrisville, North Carolina








We consent to the incorporation by reference in, Registration Statement No. 333-43613, and Registration Statement No. 333-93211 of C3, Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-151255 and Registration Statement No. 333-100883 of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 2010, except as to the information dated May 14, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Charles & Colvard, Ltd., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, were previously reported on by Frazer Frost, LLP (“Frazer Frost”).  Frost, PLLC (“Frost”), one of the firms that had combined to form Frazer Frost, has resumed their operations as a separate entity as it existed prior to the combination.  Frost has assumed responsibility for the Frazer Frost audit of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

















/s/ FROST, PLLCCertified Public Accountants








Little Rock, Arkansas


March 29, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,167,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,227,596
<PP&E>                                         264,510
<DEPRECIATION>                               (151,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,548,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,263
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,368,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,598,336
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,004,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (712,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (712,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (712,827)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ISrl NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

• 

THE NRO STAFF August 28, 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: ERTS Photography

Regarding your interest in the value of ERTS photography to the intelligence community, we have posed that

question to both DIA and NPIC. Their responses are as follows:

DIA indicated that there were no current intelligence requirements for the imagery (TAB A); however,

they did not appear to discount any future value of the

photography to the intelligence community.

NPIC has not yet reviewed much information--

only second or third generation paper prints. They are

currently negotiating with NASA to obtain more and better

pictures at which time they will study the question in

more detail. In the meantime, however, NPIC prepared a

briefing board for a presentation of some preliminary

comments to Mr. Lundahl, Mr. Inlow and Brig Gen Bradburn.

I have asked if they would give this presentation to you

should you so desire. Kathy has set aside September 1

at 1000 on your calendar for the briefing.

,412: /141c Lea-4" Captain, 771.„.< aea: „orez4r4.11111

t USAF

woo.

COMA

VISIMIOSS MOS AVISSIMIC OSSOADINS PASS OP NOSS

ON IMSICISIt San e0 Nos pm/pm
ADMINISTRATION 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112084 

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301 

July 1 7, 19 6 9 

'llllllflm11111111mTillftlllflElllllllllllllUllllll[IIIIIII, .. 14 000092970 

MEMORANDUM FOR Dr. John L. McLucas 

Under Secretary of the Air Force 

SUBJECT: Our Respective Views on Military Intelligence 

I have reviewed your memo of July 15, John. It seems to me 

the only serious disagreement is summed up in this sentence from 

the third page of your memo. 

"The difference between Froehlke I s recommendation 

and mine is that Froehlke proposes to direct daily 

operations, which would require an ever-increasing 

staff, whereas my proposal is to have this position 

as a staff function with adequate authority and 

responsibility. 11 

You certainly are correct that I recommend that the Special 

Assistant be a line, as contrasted to staff, :position. There is also 

the danger that, because of the line authority, the Special Assistant 

would become involved in 11 directing daily operations. " 

I agree with you that there is a danger. However, I do not 

envisage this being the way the Special Assistant will operate. I 

see him getting involved in daily operations to about the extent that 

Mel Laird and Dave Packard are today involved.· If he gets much 

more involved, I agree with you that the staff is woefully inadequate. 

Robert F. Froehlke 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112084
OMB Control No. 2060 -0586 

### Energy **Use Au**  **thorization Form**  Id # I hereby give permission to the electric, natural gas, fuel oil, and propane (bottled gas including LPG) company or companies that provide energy to me to provide information to the designat ed agent of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for confidential use in connection with their evaluation of energy savings achieved through the Home Performance with ENERGY STAR program. This authorization covers th e following data for a period 13 mo nths before and 13 months after energy efficiency improvement were completed on my home: **1) the total amount of fuels used by my** **household 2) the total price charged for fuels used by my**  **household** Companies are authorized to provide this information by m onthly periods or by delivery date, whichever applies. An electronic copy of this authorization may be accepted with the same authority as the original. **Printed Name: _________________________________________**

**_________ Signature**  **: ______________________ __________ Date: _______________**  **Utility/Fuel Suppler Name Ac**  **count Number**

EPA Form 5900 - 184 The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 0.05 hours and welcomes suggestions for reducing th is effort. Send co mments (referencing OMB Control Number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GROUP LONG
DISTANCE, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                        OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                                2,364,782
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           331,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (141,945)
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,638,877
<PP&E>                                                  135,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (131,746)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        3,804,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1,107,434
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,697,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          3,804,581
<SALES>                                               2,441,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,441,244
<CGS>                                                 1,304,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,304,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        513,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         81,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (97,481)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         639,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                            243,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     396,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            396,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.11


</TABLE>
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:24 AM

To: 'bryharv@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Br yan Harvey Film Inc DBA Cloudbreak

(FAA-2015-2420)



### August 27, 2015

Dear Mr. Harvey:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is mi ssing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 2420). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by September 10, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:** Irrigation Field Ditch.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
*January 8, 1935.*

#### Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Olin ■& Butler*of Madison.

For the respondents Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general; Pike River Granite Company: /. *A. Krueger*of Marinette; Indemnity Insurance Company: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, *Kenneth P. Grubb*and *Jefferson D. Burrus*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         29,465
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 149,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                    13,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              207,720
<PP&E>                                                      2,177,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                                890,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              1,537,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         210,415
<BONDS>                                                       588,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        6,343
<OTHER-SE>                                                    613,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,537,768
<SALES>                                                       281,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              281,753
<CGS>                                                          23,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 217,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 (813)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             19,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                45,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   25,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            19,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   19,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.31
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Gilla, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Georges Benarroch, President, Chief Executive Officer &


Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 15, 2012
By:
/s/ Georges BenarrochGeorges BenarrochPresident, Chief Executive Officer &

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0655

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT GONZALEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 18, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 8 2020

10/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0655