alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                 Certification


In connection with the periodic report of Optika Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Steven M. Johnson, Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

                  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


   February 4, 2004                         /s/ Steven M. Johnson
   ----------------          --------------------------------------------------
        (Date)                                Steven M. Johnson
                             Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
                                   Secretary and Chief Accounting Officer
•••

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20$N

/CODE WOR D 

July 15, 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR

r • CHAIRMAN, NSC UNDER SECRETARIES COMMITTEE

•

SUBJECT: Establishment of a Standing Committee on Space Policy

The President has directed that a standing committee of the Under

Secretaries Committte be established to address issues connected

with our national space policy as it relates to the civil/military

interface.

•

The committee should review the relationship between civil and intelligence space programs, the military significance of certain civil

space programs, and any relevant international considerations. The

committee should propose for the President's consideration appropriate new policies or changes to existing policies, and be a forum

for the interpretation end implementation of such policies.

The membership of the committee should include the members of the

Under Secretaries Committee augmented by representatives of NASA,

NRO, OMB, the President's Science Adviser, and other agencies as

appropriate to the particular issue under consideration. The committee

should be chaired by the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs.

DOD and NASA have requested that at an early opportunity the committee examine the international political considerations of remote

earth sensing, the protection of sensitive space technology, and the

public release of space data and information.

ea,

OfIshe Secretary of Defense

The Administrator, National

Aeronautics and Space Administration

TOP SECRET /CODEWORD 

I 1 ANDLX VOC

TALEHT4=1:0l.g.s.

CONTROL. GYM GM ONLY

nreeP/VS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                       5
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<CASH>                                                  7,063,557
<SECURITIES>                                           17,230,947
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,816,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                              450,122
<INVENTORY>                                               150,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         42,852,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                 9,841,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                    1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             15,416,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           42,852,602
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       22,931,301
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          612,715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      3,879,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         2,874,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,015,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,859,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,859,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.29
        



</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09166

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09166\09166_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09166\09166_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09166\09166_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09166\09166_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09166\09166_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09166\09166_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09166\09166_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09166\09166_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09166\Certification Statement Plant ID 09166.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part A Q5-2 (a).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part A Q5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Drawing D-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D Q4-21 BP closure plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09166\Supplemental Documents\09166_Part D QD4-21 Cell 1 closure plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09166\Supplemental Documents\Part A Q5-2 (b).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 101 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October 22, 2013

Rule Title(s): Definitions

Date Submitted to AR B: November 1 4 , 2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): February 23, 2010

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not compl ete remainder of form)

District Contact: Monica N. Soucier Phone Number: (760) 482

- 4606 E

- mail Address: monicasoucier@co.imperial.ca.us

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New R ule Amended Rule

Rule 101 Definitions is the general repository of all common definitions affecting various Imperial County Air

Pollution Control District rule (Rulebook)

.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name): N/A

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemen ted, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic For mat)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to t he ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TP Y) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are i n Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Se ction(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format) 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Rule 101 is simply a repository for commonly defined terms within various Air District rules

5/1/2002
AAC CAIRC MATZ ADC RqC

ARDC PACAF AU CONIC ATC

USAFSS 'NUS USAFA ANC SAC

TO

AFAFC

TAC

. •

SEQC • Complete, RCMP

4IgCRET--

• DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Ong= or 'nor CHIMP' or SwF

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OIMPLVTO

AWN 00% AFCCS

""'EDT (Una) Basic Policy Concerning SANDS 29 December 1960

1. Reference is made to: (U)

MSS letter, subject *Missile and Satellite Systems,"

14 October 1960.

SAFOI-30 message, 1506/60, 15 December 1960.

2. Secretary of the Air Force Order NO. 115.1, dated 31 August 1960,

established the Office of Missile and Satellite Systems in the Office

of the Secretary of the Air Fives. It provides that the Director of

the Office of Missile and Satellite Systems is primarily responsible

for assisting the Secretary in discharging his responsibility for the

direction, supervision and control of the SANDS project. (0)

Secretary of the Air Force Order Mc. 116.1, dated 31 August 1960,

directed the organisation of a SANDS Project Office as a field extension

of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force. It specifies

that the Director of the SANDS Project is responsible to and will

report directly to the Secretary of the Air Force. (U)

In recognition of the special management procedures and the

necessity of achieving the program objectives at the earliest date,

the following policy is established for the SANDS programs (U)

No information oonoerning this program will be initiated by

Air Force organisations. (C)

This program is an RAD effort aimed at the development of

various promising reconnaissance techniques. (U)

The RAD program will include all the necessary *laments to

insure that the data which is obtained can be efficiently and promptly

exploited. (3)

The nature and character of antatimste operational system

is completely conditional upon the success of the methods which will

be exploited in the RAD program. Therefore, as soon as sufficient

RAD progress is nide to justify effective operational planning, specific

instructions will be issued to insure timely integration of this system

in Air Force operational inventory. (S)

OS 5C-4537 - 6/

1310(31t1ET-
•

OW •

..•

-SECRET- •

5. Ito following actions be taken by this headquarters which are

consistent with the established SANDS manage nent procedures and policy

outlined above. (U)

SANDS for the time being mill not be 1314.1180d. in the Program

Documents (sannples Pa, PD) described in AIN 27-1. (11)

SVCS project information will be tarnished as necessary for

legislative matters by the Director of the Mime of Missile and

Satellite Systems. (U)

The Director of the Office of Mulls and Satellite Systems

will keep the key elements of the Air Staff end the csaimauds Wormed,

as necessary, regarding this programs. (U)

Documents reflecting Air Force requirements for recomaissence

will continue to be prepared and should be forwarded through norm/

channels to the tent for consideration in SAMS project requirements. (S)

e. Air Force Regulation 375 series viii not apply to this

program. (U)

R. N. ISTITOONIRT

Major General, U. S. Air Force

Assistant Tice Chief of Staff

2
# C_2005137EN.01002001.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/20

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M. 3778 — Böhler-Uddeholm/Buderus)

(2005/C 137/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 26 May 2005 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the Austrian undertaking Böhler-Uddeholm AG (Böhler) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the German undertaking Edelstahlwerke Buderus AG (Buderus) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 26 May 2005 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the Austrian undertaking Böhler-Uddeholm AG (Böhler) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the German undertaking Edelstahlwerke Buderus AG (Buderus) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Böhler: specialty steel, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Böhler: specialty steel,

| — | for Buderus: specialty steel. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Buderus: specialty steel.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3778 — Böhler-Uddeholm/Buderus, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3778 — Böhler-Uddeholm/Buderus, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

1

---
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 638/2006

of 26 April 2006         

specifying the extent to which applications lodged in April 2006 for import certificates in respect of young male bovine animals for fattening as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 of 29 June 2005 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for young male bovine animals for fattening (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006) (2), and in particular Articles 1(4) and 4 thereof,

Whereas:

Article 1(3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 lays down the number of young male bovine animals which may be imported on special terms during the period from 1 April to 30 June 2006. The quantities covered by import licence applications submitted are such that applications may by accepted in full,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates made in the month of April 2006 pursuant to Article 3(3), second subparagraph, third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 992/2005 are hereby met in full.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 168, 30.6.2005, p. 16.

----
# CA2005138EN.01000101.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/1

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/1801

(2005/C 138 A/01)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for Operation Quality Support in the Directorate-General Europe-Aid Cooperation Office.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the 10 new Member States of the European Union (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia).

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html - http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm and following the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration. The closing date for registration is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

---
---TOP-SEGREF-- 

numarim

-161- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. •

THE NRO STAFF September 14, 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Call from State Department

Mr. Gathright, from Ambassador Johnson's Office called

and said that the NSAM 156 Committee Report has gone to

Dlr. Kissinger. The report makes three observations:

SKYLAB cameras approved as an exception to

policy. A general review of the guidelines will not be

conducted until such time as NASA deems necessary.

The questions raised by the Soviets in private

session at the UN are discussed.

3) Dr. Cline has been tasked to evaluate the

Chinese attitudes toward satellite reconnaissance.

We will get a copy of the report.

Mr. Gathright also related that Ambassador Johnson

R. agrees a SALT ratification contingency paper should be

written but that consultation should wait until the delegation returns from Helsinki. A note to this effect will be

sent as an interim reply to Dr. McLucas on our letter to

Ambassador Johnson.

or,

gift -TVP-SECRETf1CL0010 1000 111.700•71C 01180011000

000 DeRICTvi 0000 JO boss NOT Avrty

.

st.e.7 •

.• • • • £

VN•iltrei ...114.1•4V „,tr.

111111111

111111111111111

CONT00“10 Tnternal 

co.,- 00 COPIES

PAW

6
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7598** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JOHNNY TAYLOR SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United S tates District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville
. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. ( 4:09

- cr - 00001

- JLK

- 1 )

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Johnny Taylor Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnny Taylor Smith appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

r easons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith , No. 4:09

- cr - 00001

- JLK

- 1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED