alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Missouri State Office

601 Business Loop 70 W Ste 250ColumbiaMO65203

573-876-0901

601 Business Loop 70 W Ste 250ColumbiaMO65203

Missouri

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Missouri 
-  Missouri State Office 

Helping People Help the Land

## **Welcome to NRCS in Missouri!**

### ***Scott Edwards, State Conservationist***

Missouri NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team.

----

##   Employee Directory

##   Additional Documents

NRCS Missouri Area Employee Directory(2.16 MB)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4593-4594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Johnson 
Matthey, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Johnson Matthey, Inc. applied to be registered as a 
manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA 
grants Johnson Matthey, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of those 
controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated September 25, 2014, and 
published in the Federal Register on October 7, 2014, 79 FR 60498, 
Johnson Matthey, Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte 
Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, applied to be registered 
as a manufacturer of a certain basic class of controlled substance. No 
comments or objections were submitted to this notice.

[[Page 4594]]

    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Johnson Matthey, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled 
substances is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's 
maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and 
testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the 
company's background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of marihuana (7360), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule I.
    In reference to drug code 7360, the company plans to manufacture a 
synthetic version cannabidiol in bulk for sale to its customers, who 
are final dosage form manufacturers. No other activity for this drug 
code is authorized for this registration.

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01602 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeSite HelpElectronic Submittals Application

# Reference Materials for Electronic Submissions

The information on this web page is designed to assist users in submitting documents electonically to the NRC.
            - Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC, Revision 10
            - Digital Certificate Enrollment Guide
            - Simplified PDF Document Submittal Checklist as of 09/26/2016
            - Desk Reference Guide for PDF Document Generation - Acrobat v.XI as of 02/01/2017                - Adobe Distiller Profile - compliance with NRC guidance (Right click and select "Save Target As..." then save these with a .joboptions extension)		                 - Adobe 5.0
                - Adobe 6.0
                - Adobe 7.0
                - Adobe 8.0
                - Adobe 9.0  – as of 02/01/2010
                - Adobe 10.0
                - Adobe 11.0
                - Adobe DC  – as of 11/01/2019                - Adobe Preflight Profiles (Right click and select "Save Target As..." then save these with a .kfp extension)		                 - Adobe 6.0
                - Adobe 7.0
                - Adobe 8.0
                - Adobe 9.0  – as of 02/01/2010
                - Adobe 10.0
                - Adobe 11.0
                - Adobe DC  – as of 11/01/2019 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 06, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Getting Started
          - Adjudicatory Submissions
          - Reference Materials for Electronic Submissions
          - Contact Us
          - Criminal History
          - General Submissions
          - Obtain a Digital Certificate

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - Electronic Maintenance and Submission of Information ("E-Rule")
            - E-Filing Rule 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 06, 2023
#### Consolidated Water Power & Paper Company, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Goggins, Braseau & Graves*of Wisconsin Rapids.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *Orland S. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent Mrs. John Waud: *Vernon J. McHale*of Antigo.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. E US E B I O J I ME NE Z - GA R C I A, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 50317 D. C . No . 5 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 1 6 7 - VA P ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia V i r gi ni aA . P hi l l i ps , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E usebi o Ji m enez -G ar ci a app ea l s f rom the 84 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s c onvi c t i on f ori l l e ga l r e e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . §1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e a f f i rm , but r e m a n dto c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t. 

# FI LED JAN 04 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 50317 2 J im e n e z - G ar c iac o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e w ith in th e G u id e lin e s r an g e is subst ant i vel y unrea sonabl e bec ause , am on g o ther r ea sons, the di stri ctcourtfocuse d to o h e a v ilyo n h is c r im in a l h is to ry . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t p r o c e du r a llye rr . See U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b an c ) . M o r e o v e r , in lig h t o f th e to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s tan c e s , th e s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e id. I n a c c or danc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m an dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e r e f e r e n c e to s e c tio n 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) . See U ni ted States v. H erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m an d in g s u as p o n te to del et e the re fe re nce t o sec t i on 13 26 (b)) . A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctju d gm en t.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 24, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00413

- CV

In the Matter of D. E. P

.

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIA NA

AFFIRM ED

-- OPINI ON BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on July 26, 2021

. Having rev iewed the

r ecord and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Because appellant is indigent

and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of co sts is made

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add Priority Mail International Regional Rates Boxes Contracts to the Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         February 11, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sylvia Baylis, 202-268-6464.

      ( print page 7647)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on February 4, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail International Regional Rate Boxes Contracts to the Competitive Products List, and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Contract and Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2015-31 and CP2015-40.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-02742 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2005106EN.01003102.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/31

---

Action brought on 7 February 2005 by Thomas Seldis against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-65/05)

(2005/C 106/66)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 7 February 2005 by Thomas Seldis, residing in Amsterdam (Netherlands), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin M., Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the Commission's decision of 5 April 2004 to appoint the applicant a probationary official in so far as it does not grade him on recruitment at grade A6 and was adopted without considering the possibility of allowing him additional seniority in grade in accordance with Article 32 of the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of the internal directives of 11 October 1984; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the Commission's decision of 5 April 2004 to appoint the applicant a probationary official in so far as it does not grade him on recruitment at grade A6 and was adopted without considering the possibility of allowing him additional seniority in grade in accordance with Article 32 of the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of the internal directives of 11 October 1984;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case objects to his grading as a probationary official in the JRC Directiorate General at grade A7 at the time of his appointment.

In that regard, he alleges infringement both of Articles 31 and 32 of the Staff Regulations and of the internal directives of 11 October 1984 on the fixing of the grade and step of staff, and more specifically that of officials in the scientific and technical services who occupy posts paid from appropriations in the research budget.

Having regard to his claims, the applicant maintains inter alia that, at the time of his recruitment as an official, he already had proof of more than eight years of professional experience qualifying for additional seniority.

inter alia

---
June 18, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROBERT PRIMO, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00794-CV V.

SCOTT ROTHENBERG, Appellee

________________________________

We order that the court’s former judgment of April 28, 2015, be vacated, set 

aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s memorandum opinion of April 

28, 2015, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Scott 

Rothenberg, signed June 10, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore AFFIRM

the trial court’s judgment in part with respect to the trial court’s grant of a noevidence summary judgment. We REVERSE the trial court’s judgment in part 

with respect to the trial court’s imposition of death penalty sanctions. We

REMAND the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s 

opinion.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-49/04 (1)

(2005/C 143/50)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 23 February 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-49/04 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands.

----

(1)OJ C 94 of 17.04.2004.

----
APPENDIX B

LISTING OF GAP TEST CODES IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gordon Leliever, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 2003,
          which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Registrant.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:     December 2, 2004 |  | OSPREY GOLD CORP.BY: /S/ Gordon Leliever
Gordon LelieverPresident; PrincipalFinancial Officer
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

RE APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE :

:

:

:

: N O

. 540

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of November , 2022

, David R. Crowley, Esquire

, Centre

County, is hereby re appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee

for a term expiring January 1, 202 9.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM NEW
CENTURY ENERGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                           per-book
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      200
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              200
<COMMON>                                    200
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          0
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                0
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               200
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     0
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        

</TABLE>
To	Whom	It	May	Concern:

If	you	would,	please	add	the	following	statement	as	part	of	my	333	Exemption	

request	in	reference	to	tracking	#	1jz-8kml-8hqt:

The	completed	request	by	Square	1	Media	Productions	for	the	333	Exemption	was	

outlined	in	detail based	on	the	previous	submission	and	acceptance	of:

4th Dimension	Sight	&	Sound,	Inc.

Exemption	#	12428

Regulatory	Docket	No.	– FAA-2015-1945

In	consideration	of	Square	1	Media’s	Request	and	establishing	a	consistent	

submission	process,	we	hope	you	consider	our	333	Exemption	request	as	it	follows	

the	same	necessary	guidelines	as	the	before-mentioned	company.

Thank	you	for	your	consideration,

Brandon	Monzyk

Square	1	Media	Productions

314-808-2233
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Roy Michael Geisendorff, * From the 70th District Court

 of Ector County

Trial Court No. A-45,283.

Vs. No. 11-16-00186-CR * June 14, 2018

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Dauphinot, S.J.

 (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

 Bailey, J., and Dauphinot, S.J., sitting

 by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2005106EN.01002204.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/22

---

Removal from the register of Case C-548/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 106/50)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 16 December 2004, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-548/03: European Parliament v Council of the European Union supported by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.02.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.21


                              THINK NEW IDEAS, INC.
                         45 WEST 36TH STREET, 12TH FLOOR
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018

                                  May 24, 1999


                                                             VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Larry Kopald
1161 Amherst
Unit 304
Los Angeles, CA 90049


Re:      Employment Agreement of June 30, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement")

Dear Larry:

      This is to confirm to you that THINK New Ideas,  Inc. (the  "Company") has
agreed to renew your  employment  with the Company for a period of one year (the
"Extension  Period")  commencing  upon  expiration  of the current  term of your
employment at the close of business on May 31, 1999. Your annual salary shall be
$350,000  (representing  Monthly  Compensation,  as  defined  in the  Employment
Agreement,  of  $29,167).  The the  Company  has  further  agreed that you shall
continue to be a member of executive  management,  with such title and any other
form  of  compensation  as may  be  determined  by  management.  The  Employment
Agreement shall remain in effect for the Extension Period  unmodified  except as
specifically set forth herein.

      Your service and contribution to the Company is sincerely appreciated.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   /s/ Kenneth Orton

                                                   Kenneth Orton on behalf
                                                   of the Compensation Committee

cc: Mr. Ronald Bloom
    Mr. Melvin Epstein
    Cindi Lefari, Esq.
    Victoria A. Baylin, Esq.