alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control, Aquatic Organism Passage, Dike, Fence, Grade Stabilization Structure, Integrated Pest Management, Livestock Pipeline, Nutrient Management, Pond, Structure for Water Control, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Friday, February 20, 2015.

# PLACE: 

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

Natise Allen,

Executive Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2015-03166 Filed 2-11-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
November 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Wetland Enhancement (Code 659) 

Wetland enhancement is the rehabilitation or

reestablishment of a degraded wetland, and/or the

modification of an existing wetland to favor specific wetland

functions. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies on any degraded or nondegraded

existing wetland where the objective is specifically to

enhance selected wetland functions. This practice is not

used on degraded wetlands when the soils, hydrology, vegetative community, and biological habitats

are returned to original conditions or where a wetland is created on a site that historically was not a

wetland. 

The purpose of this practice is to provide specific wetland conditions by: 

• Hydrologic enhancement (depth duration and season of inundation, and/or duration and season

of soil saturation), and/or 

• Vegetative enhancement (including the removal of undesired species, and/or seeding or planting

of desired species). 

Native vegetative species should be used in the enhancement whenever possible. 

Manipulation of water levels can be used to control unwanted vegetation. Haying or grazing can also

be used to manage vegetation. 

Common Associated Practices 

Wetland Enhancement (659) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as: Dike (356),

Structure for Water Control (587), Fence (382), Fish Passage (396), and Use Exclusion (472). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
March 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2008



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 30 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID NOLLMEYER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DELAWARE STATE POLICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-2306

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1319-MV/DJS)

(D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Nollmeyer, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his civil rights action against the

United States for failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and against the

Delaware State Police for lack of personal jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(2). We

construe Mr. Nollmeyer’s docketing statement filed in this court on September 23,
1997, as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal from the district court’s

order of April 14, 1997 dismissing the action and the September 2, 1997 denial of

post-judgment motions. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992); Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1); 4(a)(4)(C). We have reviewed the record and affirm for

substantially the same reasons relied upon by the magistrate judge, although we

remand for the district court to enter judgment dismissing without prejudice the

claims against the Delaware State Police, as these claims were dismissed for lack

of personal jurisdiction. See Madara v. Hall, 916 F.2d 1510, 1514 n. 1 (11th Cir.

1990). To the extent Mr. Nollmeyer raises new issues in his appeal not addressed

below, we deem them waived and do not address them. See Sac & Fox Nation v.

Hanson, 47 F.3d 1061, 1063 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 (1995). We

construe Mr. Nollmeyer’s continued filings with this court as motions to file

supplemental briefs and deny them.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

 Entered for the Court

PER CURIAM
, & {;
. 2 o ret ai Cb Ate ce

ae ~

WEEKLY DIARY ITEMS - LETP W pT
19 Feb 59 Thru 25 Feb 59
(U) Calibration and Standards Laboratory and Services for Vandenberg AFB

Two of the three contracts for SR 192, Strategic Lunar System Study, 4
are undergoing initial Procurement Committee review Brior to submission i

1959. In order to minimize any deley.in making the awards, three contracts oi
will be. processed up to the Point of execution. by the Contracting Officer. “

», () _ Space Technology Laboratories, Inc.

i. Fee negotiations relative to Definitive Contract No. AF 04(647)-~302"
are still in Progress,’ with some headway being made in that the parties
are narrowing the area of disagreement. On 25 February 1959, LBTP forwarded
to STL an Advance Copy of Contract No. AF 04(647)-302 which incorporated the
Air Force fee offer of $710,600. We hope to resolve the fee question within
ten days. . : . :

2. On 25 February 1959, STL received the Amendments to Letter Contracts
No. AF 04(647)-205 and No. AF O4(647)~302, These Amendments were issued.to
provide additional funds to the above Letter Contracts covering Projects
ABLE-3 and ABLE~4, No problems are anticipated in the execution of these

3- Amendment No. 1 to Letter Contract No. AF Ol 647 )~309 was delivered i
to STL on 19 February 1959. This Amendment covers STL's effoxt for SE/TD :
for ARPA Project 17-59 (Vehicles 1 and 3). No problems ere anticipated in |
execution of this Amendment. . :

—.
# C_2005048EN.01000602.xml

| 24.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3677 — Danske Bank/National Europe Holdings/Northern Bank Insurance Services)

(2005/C 48/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3677. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3677. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; andb)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    /s/ J. Leland StrangeJ. Leland StrangeChief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS

388 TH DISTRICT COURT

IN THE MATTER OF §

THE MARRIAGE OF: §

§

MIGUEL ZAVALA MEJIA §

§

Petitioner, § Cause No. 2018 DCV 4780

§

and §

§

YOLANDA ZAVALA §

§

Respondent, §

_____________________________________________________

YOLANDA ZAVALA'S NOTICE OF APPEAL

______________________________________________________

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:

Petitioner files this notice of appeal and would show the court as follows:

1. The trial court in this case was the 388 th District Court, El Paso

County, Texas.

2. The case's trial court number is 2018 DCV 4780.

3. The style of the case is: In the Matter of the Marriage of: Miguel Zavala

and Yolanda Zavala.

4. The date of the judgment or order appealed from is December 20, 2023.

5. Respondent desires to appeal.

6. The appeal is taken to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso Texas.

7. The name of the party filing this notice of appeal is Yolanda Zavala. Filed 1/19/2023 7:52 PM

2018DCV4780 Norma Favela Barceleau El Paso County - 388th District Court

District Clerk

El Paso CountyRespectfully Submitted,



### P AUL 

### F. G RAJEDA

A TTORNEY AT L AW

416 N. Stanton Street, Suite 601

El Paso, Texas 79901

Telephone: (915) 534-7285

Facsimile: (915) 534-7287

paulfgrajeda@mac.com

By: 

## /s/ 

# Paul F. Grajeda

P AUL F. G RAJEDA

State Bar No. 00796661

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to T EX R. C IV . P. 21 and 21a, I hereby certify on this the 19 th day of

January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served via the

court's efiling system.



## /s/ 

# Paul F. Grajeda

P AUL F. G RAJEDA

### Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.

The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system

on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing

certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a

certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Paul Grajeda

Bar No. 796661 paulgrajeda@mac.com

Envelope ID: 71967120

Status as of 1/20/2023 8:03 AM MST

Associated Case Party: Yolanda Zavala

Name

PAUL FREDERICKGRAJEDA BarNumber Email

paulgrajeda@mac.com TimestampSubmitted

1/19/2023 7:52:07 PM Status

SENT

Case Contacts

Name

c q BarNumber Email

carlos@quinonezlawfirm.com TimestampSubmitted

1/19/2023 7:52:07 PM Status

SENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          35,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,482
<INVENTORY>                                     40,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,028
<PP&E>                                          49,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,154
<BONDS>                                          2,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           431
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,140
<SALES>                                        172,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,129
<CGS>                                           84,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,787
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,932
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,531
<INVENTORY>                                     53,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,640
<PP&E>                                         806,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,805,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,549
<BONDS>                                      1,014,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,040,529
<OTHER-SE>                                   (398,878)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,805,356
<SALES>                                        732,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               732,752
<CGS>                                          177,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  771,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (154,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,625
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (182,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (18,648)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (201,013)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Water Well, Monitoring Well.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
MANGLE VIA

OMAN

CONTROL SYSTEM

CLNNIPHOOMI OVISAAN.1 SNONPIPOON T OONOOM. commpFlealivONscourouu out exianive omen I $U Exurnow can.

OON ► 110 0110./ANNPV ON $00 NIT.

-12908.

00.11

F I FAG

* . •4, • k .:...1.T117,77. •

*.' • •'• • 4::4't " a

.••

„.111P—SECIEr STE

immuisibbstri.m.ia.

MAN

CoNTROL SYSTEM

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR 10 May 1976 •

MEMCMANDUH FOR MR. ROBERT T. ANDREWS, SENIOR ADVISOR TO THE

GENERAL COUNSEL, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL

COUNSEL

SUBJECT: Implementation of Executive Order 11905

Attached for your review is a draft statement which

addresses the National Reconnaissance Program's (NRP) domestic satellite reconnaissance activities. I propose that this

statement be approved and forwarded to the National

Reconnaissance Office (NRO) as authority to continue the

limited, very essential domestic research and development

and test requirements on NRP satellite systems. Also attached.

is a draft message which, upon approval of the statement,

would be forwarded to NRP field elements as an implementing

directive.

While I do not believe that the intent of Executive Order

11905 is to restrict the type of domestic activities we currently performoi do feel that it is important that these

activities be identified.

Charles W. Cook

2 Attachments

Authorization Letter

Draft Missage

I II E

••