alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Belden, Roy S (GE Capital) [roy.belden@ge.com]

Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:10 PM

To: Oquendo, Ana

Cc: Forney, Katy; 'rick.waggoner@complianceops.com';

'scott_osbourn@golder.com'; 'dlarocca@golder.com';

'amorrison@hgslaw.com'; Mathur, Ankur (GE Capital)

Subject: RE: Clarification needed

Attachments: Shady Hills GHG BACT Tables 4 Gen Update 6 26 13.xlsx

Ms. Oquendo,

We intend to permit a unit rated at 2,500 kW. The reference to a 1,000 kW unit was a mistake in our

application to EPA Region 4. As a result, we have updated the EPA GHG Application Table 4 to be

consistent with the fuel heat input of the 2,500 kW unit per the FDEP application and final FDEP PSD

permit. Attached is a revised version of Table 4.

The EFS Shady Hills team is working on responses to your other two inquiries, and we expect to be able

to provide you with responses within the next week to 10 days. In the meantime, please let us know if

you have any additio nal questions.

Regards, Roy

Roy S. Belden

EFS Shady Hills LLC

c/o GE Energy Financial Services

800 Long Ridge Road

Stamford, CT 06927

T: +1 203

- 357

- 6820

M: +1 203

- 240

- 4321

roy.belden@ge.com

From: Oquendo, Ana [ mailto:Oquendo.Ana@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 3:15 PM

To: Belden, Roy S (GE Capital)

Cc: Forney, Katy; 'rick.waggoner@complianceops.com'; 'scott_osbourn@golder.com';

'dlarocca@golder.com'; 'amorrison@hg slaw.com'; Mathur, Ankur (GE Capital)

Subject: Clarification needed

Good day,

As review of the GHG PSD permit for Shady Hills Generating Station continues, EPA Region 4 needs

further clarification on the following matter:

1. In the GHG PSD application, the emergency generator is described as having a rating of 1,000

kW; however, the construction permit issued by FDEP describes the emergency generator (EU

007) as having a rating of 2,500 kW. Can you provide clarification as to what is the correct rating

of th e proposed emergency generator?Thanks,

Ana M. Oquendo

Environmental Engineer

Air Permits Section, APTMD

EPA Region 4

phone 404

- 562

- 2476

fax 404

- 562

- 9019

email oquendo.ana@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 10.51

                                                                   -------------
HEARTSOFT LOGO



CORPORATE NOTE


MARCH 1, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Heartsoft, Inc. promises to pay to the order of:

                    Hi-Tel Group, Inc.
                    2400 East Commercial Blvd, Suite 205
                    Ft Lauderdale, Florida  33308

the sum of $40,000 (forty thousand dollars), with interest from the date written
above until paid; at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.

This Note, together with all interest due, is payable in one (1) year from the
date written above.

Heartsoft shall reserve the right to prepay the principle of this Note, together
with all such accrued interest at the time of prepayment in whole or in part
prior to its due date without premium or penalty.

Heartsoft, signers, and endorsers of this Note severally waive demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection and notice of protest
and agree to all extensions and partial payments before or after maturity,
without prejudice to the holder. This written Note represents the final
agreement between the parties and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior,
contemporaneous, or subsequent oral agreements of the parties.

Heartsoft, Inc.


by:        /s/ Benjamin P. Shell
           ---------------------
           Benjamin P. Shell
           Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005131EN.01000802.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3725 — Cargill/Pagnan)

(2005/C 131/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3725. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3725. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
• • WIS ••• •

I; ln • :Pr P:.; 235

SAFSS

CHANNELS

Redacted by PR

alU1ikltalal.!1114..

Q323SEIME66

RR RLOCQAA

DE RLOCQBAA 484 3291928

EVY =CC( T22

R 24185&

BT

:122 1111

FES

-111101111111111111111PUNDLE V

JOWLY 2418582 NOV 72 CITE

•••••• N

HMDLE. VIA AWLS JOINTLY

FOR F. HOFN FM E. GILL SS

1=5;EREZCE: "AMIDE TO THE SPACE TASK GROUP

Poor - T E NRP - DATED 15 JUL 1969.

INFOTiATICR CaNTAINED LI VARIOUS SECTIO16 OF

3Y IN SPXIAL MD HIGH LEVEL ELIEVINCS. FOR

l IN Is USED EITENSIVMY AND MOST BENSI CIALLY

NE mosr ter E ARSE ABLE TO UPDATE POLICY O(ISTORY)

IT OCTIIIIS, 'JTILITI1G CURRENT TRAFFIC AND POLICY

DIFIZTIVES. HDWEVE11, THE INTEL It DATA

artMARIZED UNDER, "NATIONAL DIP3Teit:= OF THE

PROM M," PAGE 7, IS POSSIBLY OUTDATED AND WORE

alMEgT DIFORIATION MAY BE Nouteu.

PAM 21011.0254nNNImmer

3. REWEST YOUR. ASSISTAICE IN 072AINING MY

UPDATED DATA ALAMO THESE LINES WHICH WA

!..".:}1AVCE THE ACCURACY, THOB3UG1NESS AND IMPROVE

THE aIiB iii0UR !RIVING?. E-2 INPDET ii

3T

RON 241934
#### Parkinson and another, Partners, Appellants, vs. Hoeschler, Respondent.

For the appellants: *T. H. Skemp*and *Hale & Burke,*all of La Crosse.

For the respondent: *William H. Stevenson*and *George H. Gordon, Law & Gordon,*all of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with ,$25 costs, on March 3, 1936.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of DirectorsSirona Dental Systems, Inc.:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-106237, 333-83488and 333-46825) on Form S-8 of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (f/k/aSchick Technologies, Inc.) of our reports dated December 8, 2006,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.and subsidiaries (Successor) as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity andcomprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the periods from October 1,2005 to September 30, 2006 and from July 1, 2005 to September 30,2005 (Successor periods), and the consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of SironaDental Systems Beteiligungs- und Verwaltungs GmbH and subsidiaries (Predecessor2) for the periods from October 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 and from February 17,2004 to September 30, 2004 (Predecessor 2 periods), and the consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss),and cash flows of Sirona Beteiligungs- und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH andsubsidiaries (Predecessor 1) for the period from October 1, 2003 to February 16,2004 (Predecessor 1 period), management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which report appearsin the September 30, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of SironaDental Systems, Inc. Our reports state that the respective financialinformation for the periods after each of the acquisitions described in Notes 2and 5 to the consolidated financial statements is presented on a different costbasis than that for the periods before the acquisition and, therefore, is notcomparable.

KPMGDeutsche Treuhand-GesellschaftAktiengesellschaft WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftFrankfurt, GermanyDecember 8, 2006

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY P. ORRICO

, Appellant,

v.

MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 891

[ February 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CA000422XXXXMB

.

Millie Orrico of Orrico Law, P.A., Tequesta, for appellant.

David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder, Professio nal Association,

Tampa, and Joshua D. Moore of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra,

Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10 Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,862
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               321,198
<PP&E>                                         113,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          309,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   549,178
<SALES>                                      1,526,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,526,753
<CGS>                                        1,154,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,538,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,033)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (18.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.39)
        

</TABLE>
••• t • a

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE ken, valitais/reme Num.1110111

OFFIOC OF The UMW SOOPICTANY June 28, 1969

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD •

SUBJECT: Status Report on TAGBOARD

Colonel Hartley brought representatives from

the Lockheed Aircraft Co. and Hycon Camera Co. to

submit a report on the status of the TAGBOARD program.

The next launch is scheduled for July 10th. They feel

fairly confident that most of their previous problems

have been solved. They reviewed the previous flights

showing how they take off from Beale, launch the aircraft

to Hawaii, fly over the islands and then recover back

at Hawaii. They presented a long list of improvements

they have made, many of them as a result of a review

headed by Mr. Plummer of Lockheed. They paid particular

attention to improvements in the autopilot and to the

hatch. Despite all the improvements and despite the lack

of knowledge of the cause of previous failures, Colonel

Hartley repeated they have confidence in a successful

July 10th launch.

The representatives from the Hycon Camera Co.

described a camera which is called the HK 335. It is

631/2" Tong and weighs 275 lbs. It has a F5.6, 24" focal

length lense. The picture formac iis a 9x9 frame. The

camera should yield a 140 line per millimeter which

would give 1 ft. resolution, however their goal is 2 ft.

resolution. They are now getting about 6 ft. The camera can take pictures of a strip 80 n.m. wide and 3,000

miles long. They are using 

'

SO 230 film which they find

better than the 3400 film. There are some temperature

4a-variation problems and they intend to send the camera

to Wright Field and check it on the Dynamic Analyzer.

Their biggest problem is quality control and they are

working hard at controls for people, procedures, and

equipment.

11111111111111i

John L. McLucas

RA... : • . v. 1011. 1 • ... . .. 1

CO;;17.:.L. .;*.:., li AL..: n ......*-/ TO? SET• f:n". ••• • i 4.1. •
# C_2005133EN.01000902.xml

| 31.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3722 — Nutreco/Stolt-Nielsen/Marine Harvest JV)

(2005/C 133/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3722. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3722. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,996                  77,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,117)                 (5,117)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,688                  78,688
<PP&E>                                          88,322                  88,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,867)                (28,867)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,407                 318,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,776                  64,776
<BONDS>                                        114,198                 114,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           396                     396
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,037                 139,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,407                 318,407
<SALES>                                         85,799                 266,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,799                 266,810
<CGS>                                           65,472                 195,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,147                 253,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,318                   7,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    334                   5,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                334                   5,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       334                   5,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01                     .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                     .18


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our  reports dated May 13,  2005  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial   statements   and  schedule  and   management's   assessment  of  the
effectiveness  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  included in the
Annual Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March
31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statement of Schick Technologies,  Inc. on Forms S-8. (File No.
333-46825,  effective February 24, 1998, File No. 333-83488,  effective February
27, 2002).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
New York, New York
May 13, 2005
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Minnesota - Fiscal Year 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FISCAL
1999 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERIKING, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1999
<CASH>                                          14,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,934
<PP&E>                                         106,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,039
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           44,418
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,293
<SALES>                                        395,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,901
<CGS>                                          126,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,205
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       817
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.77)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and
the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the
Report):

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ Gary C. Kaufman
Name:  Gary C. Kaufman
Date:   November 14, 2002
[No. 25150.

Department Two.

July 9, 1934.]

#### Ollie M. Powell, Respondent, v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Appellant.*
      *1*

*The Attorney General*and *Browder Brown, Assistant,*for appellant.

*F. M. O’Leary*and *Harry Ellsworth Foster,*for respondent.

Reported in 34 P. (2d) 459.

Per

case presents the identical question which was

presented and decided in *Abraham v. Department of Labor and Industries, ante*p. 160.

Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.