alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into all Registration
Statements on Form 10-K of South Street Financial Corp. of our report dated
November 10, 1999, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of South Street Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of September 30,
1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year period then ended, which report appears in the Company's 1999
annual report on Form 10-K.

/s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
December 28, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                             
                                                                   
<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>   1

                                                                   
<S>                             <C>                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   (303)
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         155,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      225,700
<PP&E>                              1,363,400
<DEPRECIATION>                        624,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,221,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 877,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                            7,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,221,400
<SALES>                               697,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      697,000
<CGS>                                 618,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         734,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     33,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (67,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (67,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (67,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
                                       
                                 

</TABLE>
# C_2005037EN.01000301.xml

| 12.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3558 — Cytec/UCB – Surface Specialties)

(2005/C 37/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3558. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3558. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
TICKLER

RETURN TO

FILE

SUSPENSE

,SIGNATURE::

APPROVAL

COMMENTS

COORDINATION

ACTION

INFORMATION

•

•

arsrarmamed111.11

fieftvoTii‘6. Kuffir4

4t 1 scs 

.

SSO AND SPO HANDLING ONLY -7--

•n•••grof....",-..7 e•porT,

• • .

_s • ...
TOP SECRET

--(STNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGT0h. D C

OW.

•

I

!OIL NHO ST AI

211240RANDUM FOR MR. PLUMMER

SUBJECT: Director, Program A

The memorandum at the right appoints General'Kulpa as

Director, Program A. Request that you sign the appointment

memorandum.

41111X.P . , .

Colonel, USAF

11111111117/"OSNANAL

IntrwrivF morn issiszentarnow •T&

W,* ItLiet-sfetEr----

CO‘Al FA SIOSY SUP DECLASSIFY OM IMP DE1

CONTNOL NO

COPY OF COPIFS

PAM OF PAOLS
....

......... • .

TOPSURET-- 10111111111V

._ieroATIoNAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

•

12 August 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR BRIGADIER GENERAL KULPA, PROGRAM A

SUBJECT: Appointment

You are hereby appointed Director, National Reconnaissance

Office, Program A, effective 1 August 1975.

As Director, Program A, you are responsible solely to the

Director, National RecOnnaissance Office for the conduct of

this program. In addition to your Program A responsibilities,

you should assure adequate coordination with the other activities

of the NRO through Colonel Wheeler and the NRO Staff.

I am pleased to welcome you back to the NRO and look

forward to working with you.

410#11161

•

alb CLAINOPISOMINIII:MOM

OIMORAL OULE OF

IMECuinvE CATS

CONY In IlEcualsiv ON MIS DOT.

CONT giaZQ" 7

COPY cries

',sac...I...or _1, PAGES

•

••• • '.:;;;;' „.

t:rod. tn;A:
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                                                  ------------


        CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND
       SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Precision Drilling Corporation as agent
for and on behalf of  Precision  Drilling  Trust,  hereby  certifies,  to such
officer's knowledge, that:

The annual  report on March 31,  2006 for the year ended  December  31 of 2005
fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in this annual  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of
Precision Drilling Trust.




By: /s/ Hank B. Swartout
---------------------------
Hank B. Swartout
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Precision Drilling Corporation, for and on behalf
of Precision Drilling Trust


March 31, 2006
# C_2005019EN.01002101.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 November 2004

in Case T-164/02: Kaul GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ARCOL - Earlier Community word mark CAPOL - Scope of the assessment conducted by the Board of Appeal - Assessment of evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal)

(2005/C 19/45)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-164/02: Kaul GmbH, established in Elmshorn (Germany), represented by G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl and G. Schneider) the other party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal having been Bayer AG, established in Leverkusen (Germany), – action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2002 (Case R 782/2000-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Kaul GmbH and Bayer AG – the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, M. Vilaras and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 4 March 2002 (Case R 782/2000-3) of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 4 March 2002 (Case R 782/2000-3) of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180 of 27.2.2002.

1

---
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **1188** Docket Number
**2012** - **SW -**  **049 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Em ergency Alert Service Bulletin EC135 - 62A - 029, Revision 2, dated May 17, 2012.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
.1

$Arie •

. "

• •

n•• •

•

•• ••:

•It

92442 JUN 72 CIT34.1572.

•

•

0 ZCZCXQA651VAA217

PP RUXQAAB

DE RUXQVA 572 1712146

ZNY XXXXX XXX 2111

P 1921442

0 X

BT

XXXX

OPCEN 3117,et77

OPCEN PASDe •

46 1111111,ASS

•

. . .

. • nS

 • e

•

REPORTS FOLLOWING CLOSE OUT OF TIE CORONA PROGRAM • . A:• ON 30 JUNE 1972. IN GENERAL ONLY THE POST MISSION DATA FOR • 7..;

MISSIONS 1116 AND 1117 WILL BE RETAINED. THIS DATA WILL BE 4;

. r •

RETAINED FOR SIX MONTHS. . - 1. t

2. DURING THIS SIX MONTH PE WILL HAVE THE

CAPABILITY TO RETRANSMIT THE R , R-16, R-58A, R-581), • •••:: ;;.:

R•62, R-70, R-81, R-91, R-91 ANO R-206 MESSAGES FOR THE ABOVE • ..'. ...:4

MISSIONS. IN GENERAL IT WILL NOT BE FEASIBLE TO REGENERATE •..,::...e.?

OTHER DATA REPORTS FOR PAST CORONA MISSIONS SINCE CONTRACTOR • • — • •*: ,. .-:, " •

..• • :;$

— Ai

..• • .• .;;•:•?

s.

PRIOR ITY

PRS/WCPO

So8J MISSION DATA STORAGE

ANS TO RETAIN ONLY A MINIMUM OF CORONA

MISS

PERSON LT 

2

NO LONGER BE A LE.

3. A HISTORICAL FILE OF A OMPUTER SOFTWARE FROM •• • .-:-:.'Ts,,,•

THE CORONA PROGRAM WILL BE RE Y THIS OFFICE INDEFINITELY f••-• •,.-fi

IT IS FELT THAT SUCH A FILE NIGHT BE OF VALUE ON FUTURE • ' ..4,..1k

SOFTWARE EFFORTS

.

4 YE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS • i.•

FOR RETEN ON OF CO ONA MISSION DATA REPORTS THEY SHOULD R E:.; • ••.-

• :•...,

® frilurs pumprusa ION NLT 23 JUNE.

•..

•

•

BT
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2229 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide permanent authority for 

judicial review of certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions relating to whistleblowers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself and Mr. FARENTHOLD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide permanent 

authority for judicial review of certain Merit Systems 

Protection Board decisions relating to whistleblowers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All Circuit Review 

5 Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2229 IH

1 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION 

2 BOARD DECISIONS RELATING TO WHISTLE3 BLOWERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, 

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘During the 

6 5-year period beginning on the effective date of the Whis7 tleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, a peti8 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘A petition’’. 

9 (b) DIRECTOR REVIEW.—Section 7703(d)(2) of such 

10 title is amended by striking ‘‘During the 5-year period be11 ginning on the effective date of the Whistleblower Protec12 tion Enhancement Act of 2012, this paragraph’’ and in13 serting ‘‘This paragraph’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,807,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,055,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,139,870
<INVENTORY>                                  7,339,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,699,363
<PP&E>                                      91,884,537
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,460,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             166,311,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,510,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,208
<OTHER-SE>                                  83,007,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               166,311,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           138,544,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              102,201,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,104,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,464,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,879,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,731,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,148,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
HomeNuclear SecurityDomestic SafeguardsPhysical Protection

# Intrusion Detection

An intrusion detection system is intended to notify the site's security force of a potential intruder.

**Licensee detection capability addresses the following adversary intrusion tactics:**
        - stealth
        - deceit
        - force

**Perimeter intrusion detection systems include:**
        - Volumetric systems, such as microwave and some electric field systems	           - Volumetric systems detect disturbances of a volume of space
          - For a microwave system with separate transmitters and receivers, this space is between the transmitter and the receiver.
          - For an electric field sensor, the space parallels the sensor and generator wires.
          - The effective detection volume must be sufficiently high and wide to prevent jumping across without detection and sufficiently low to detect someone attempting to crawl beneath it. 
        - Planar systems, such as fence disturbance and infrared systems, detect disturbances of the geometric plane containing the system elements.
        - Security officers

**Interior intrusion detection systems include:**
        - Door mounted balanced magnetic switches
        - Interior volumetric systems	           - Ultrasound
          - Infrared
          - Motion detection closed circuit television 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Armed Response
          - Threat Assessment
          - Intrusion Alarm Assessment
          - Intrusion Detection
          - Physical Protection Areas
          - Regulatory Initiatives

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into all Registration
Statements on Form 10KSB of South Street Financial Corp. of our report dated
February 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of South Street Financial Corp. and its subsidiary as of December 31,
2002, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2002, which report appears in the Company's 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB.

/s/ Dixon & Odom, PLLC
----------------------

Sanford, North Carolina
March 26, 2003
# C_2005106EN.01004302.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/43

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-205/03, T-206/03, T-207/03, T-208/03, T-209/03, and T-210/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 106/85)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 25 January 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-205/03, T-206/03,T-207/03, T-208/03, T-209/03, and T-210/03, Nicolas Georgiopoulos and Others, Panayotis Adamopoulos and Others, Athanassios Rammos, Stavroula Gogos-Skarpatzi and Others, Nikolaos Andrikakis and Others, Konstantinos Athanassopoulos and Others v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20185 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELIDA MARTINEZ-ARRAMBIDE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-715-1

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Elida Martinez-Arramide (Martinez) appeals a 77-month sentence imposed following her plea of guilty to a charge of being present in the United States after deportation, a violationof 8 U.S.C. § 1326. She contends that because her prior statecourt conviction for mere possession of cocaine does not qualify as an “aggravated felony,” the district court erred by basing her sentence on a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A).No. 01-20185 -2- Martinez acknowledges that her contention is foreclosed by this court’s decisions in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997), and United States v. Hernandez-Avalos , 251 F.3d 505 (5th Cir. 2001). However, she seeks to preserve the issue for review by the Supreme Court. See McKnight v. General Motors Corp. , 511 U.S. 659, 659-60 (1994). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment must be AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED.
Net return

C.3 (+) Habitat 

suitability, health for

humans, domestic and 

wildlife

C.1 (+) Income and income stability 

(individual and community)

C.2 (+) Quality of available 

water supply for domestic,

agricultural and wildlife 

uses

I.7 (+) Quality of 

groundwaters

I.5 (-) Risk of future 

regulatory compliance

I.6 (-) Contaminants, 

pathogens, sediments to

groundwater

I.4 (+) Meeting 

water quality

standards

I.3 (+) Water available 

for other uses

Well Decommissioning (351)

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Start

Initial setting: A water well that is no longer used 

and is a potential source for groundwater 

contamination

D.3 (-) Physical 

risk / hazard to 

people, livestock,

and wildlife

D.4 (-) On-farm 

available water

supply

D.2 (+) Maintenance costs D.5 (-) Potential for 

groundwater contamination

1. Removal of all pumps, pipes, casing, and 

material, plugging and backfill of well as

allowed by local and State laws

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) 

or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

NRCS Conservation Practice Effects - Network Diagram September 2020

LEGEND

Pathway

D.1 (+) Cost of 

materials and labor

for installation

I.1 (-) Liability

I.2 (+/-)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 14, 2006



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*April 30, 1929.*

#### Cory, Respondent, vs. Proctor and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Proctor & Proctor,*attorneys, and *J. Henry Bennett,*of counsel, all of Viroqua.

For the respondent: *Graves & Gulbrandsen*of Viroqua.

*By the Court*

Judgment affirmed.