Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 28 / Wednesday, February 11, 2015 / Proposed Rules 7553 

window fenestration labeling programs 

available to the manufactured housing 

industry that may label the whole 

window or individual insulated glass 

units (IGUs). 

2. DOE requests comment on the 

potential challenges related to 

determining the energy efficiency of 

IGUs in manufactured homes or 

insuring the efficiency of IGUs in 

manufactured homes in connection with 

voluntary window fenestration labeling 

programs. 

3. DOE requests comment on any 

other issues related to the regulation of 

window fenestration in manufactured 

housing. 

III. Submission of Comments 

DOE invites all interested parties to 

submit in writing by March 13, 2015, 

comments and information on matters 

addressed in this RFI. After the close of 

the comment period, DOE will consider 

the public comments in development of 

the proposed rule. 

DOE considers public participation to 

be a very important part of the process 

for developing energy efficiency 

standards for manufactured housing. 

DOE actively encourages the 

participation and interaction of the 

public during the comment period at 

each stage of the rulemaking process. 

Interactions with and between members 

of the public provide a balanced 

discussion of the issues and assist DOE 

in the rulemaking process. Anyone who 

wishes to be added to the DOE mailing 

list to receive future notices and 

information about this rulemaking 

should contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at 

(202) 586–2945, or via email at 

Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 3, 

2015. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02842 Filed 2–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2014–1075] 

RIN 1625–AA87 

Security Zone, U.S. Open Golf 

Championship, South Puget Sound; 

University Place, WA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary security zone for 

the U.S. Open Golf Championship at 

Chambers Bay Golf Course in South 

Puget Sound, University Place, WA, 

from June 14, 2015 through June 22, 

2015. This action is necessary to ensure 

the safety and security of participants, 

spectators, and event officials at the U.S. 

Open Golf Championship, and will do 

so by prohibiting any person or vessel 

from entering or remaining in the 

security zone unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port or his Designated 

Representative. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before March 13, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number using any 

one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries 

accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for further instructions on 

submitting comments. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of 

these three methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Petty Officer Ryan Griffin, Coast 

Guard Sector Puget Sound, Waterways 

Management Division; telephone (206) 

217–6323, email 

SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone (202) 

366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking, indicate the specific section 

of this document to which each 

comment applies, and provide a reason 

for each suggestion or recommendation. 

You may submit your comments and 

material online at http://

www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online, it will be considered 

received by the Coast Guard when you 

successfully transmit the comment. If 

you fax, hand deliver, or mail your 

comment, it will be considered as 

having been received by the Coast 

Guard when it is received at the Docket 

Management Facility. We recommend 

that you include your name and a 

mailing address, an email address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number [USCG–2014–1075] in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a 

Comment’’ on the line associated with 

this rulemaking. 

If you submit your comments by mail 

or hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

2. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number (USCG–2014–1075) in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
7554 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 28 / Wednesday, February 11, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

3. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

4. Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one, using one of the methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

B. Regulatory History and Information 

This security zone is necessary to 

safeguard the U.S. Open Golf 

Championship participants and 

attendees from potential waterborne 

threats and hazards. It is also intended 

to prevent potential subversive acts that 

threaten the safety and security of the 

participants, spectators, and event 

officials at this event. The U.S. Open 

Golf Championship is an internationally 

televised event and will have a daily 

attendance of approximately 65,000 

people. The event involves a security 

risk due to the participants’ highly 

recognized national profiles. 

C. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the proposed rule 

is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 

701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 

CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; 

Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; 

Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1, which 

collectively authorize the Coast Guard 

to establish security zones. 

The Chambers Bay Golf Course, 

located in the city of University Place, 

WA and the County of Pierce, will be 

the host site for the U.S. Golf 

Association 115th Annual U.S. Open 

Golf Championship from June 15, 2015 

through June 21, 2015. This event will 

have a daily attendance of 

approximately 65,000 people and 

receives international press including 

multiple days of live television 

coverage. Due to the high number of 

general public in attendance and press 

coverage, the U.S. Open Golf 

Championship qualifies as a significant 

special event that requires a security 

zone. Based on past incursions at 

similar events at Chambers Bay Golf 

Course, this security zone is necessary 

for the size detailed in the regulation 

section below, 24 hours a day, for the 

duration of the event. 

The purpose of this rule is to deter 

and prevent potential criminal and 

terrorist activity against the large 

gathering of people at the highly 

publicized U.S. Open Golf 

Championship. This action is necessary 

to ensure the safety and security of 

participants, spectators, and event 

officials at the U.S. Open Golf 

Championship, and will do so by 

prohibiting any person or vessel from 

entering or remaining in the security 

zone unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port or his Designated 

Representative. 

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a temporary security zone on all waters 

encompassed by the following points: 

47°12′50′′ N, 122°35′25′′ W; thence 

southerly to 47°11′14′′ N, 122°35′50′′ W; 

thence easterly to the shoreline at 

47°11′14′′ N, 122°35′03′′ W; thence 

northerly along the shoreline to 

47°12′49′′ N, 122°34′39′′ W; thence 

westerly back to the point of origin. 

Vessels wishing to enter the security 

zone must request permission for entry 

by contacting the Joint Harbor 

Operations Center at (206) 217–6001, or 

the on-scene patrol craft via VHF–FM 

Ch 13. If permission for entry is granted, 

vessels must proceed at a minimum 

speed for safe navigation. 

E. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 

or under section 1 of Executive Order 

13563. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under those 

Orders. This proposed rule is not a 

significant regulatory action because it 

would create a security zone that is 

minimal in size and short in duration. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this proposed rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which may 

be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

through the established security zone 

during the times of enforcement. This 

proposed rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

because the temporary security zone is 

the minimum size necessary to achieve 

intended purpose, maritime traffic 

would be able to transit around it and 

may be permitted to transit them with 

the permission from the Captain of the 

Port or a Designated Representative. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this proposed rule would economically 

affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

rule would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will 

not retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would not call for 

a new collection of information under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 28 / Wednesday, February 11, 2015 / Proposed Rules 7555 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and determined that it does not 

have implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this proposed rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This proposed rule is not an 

economically significant rule and would 

not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves the establishment of a 

temporary security zone near Chambers 

Bay Golf Course in South Puget Sound, 

University Place, WA. This proposed 

rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add temporary § 165.T13–281 to 

read as follows: 

§ 165.T13.281 Security Zone; U.S. Open 

Golf Championship, South Puget Sound; 

University Place, WA. 

(a) Location. This temporary security 

zone is established in all waters 

encompassed by the following points: 

47°12′50′′ N, 122°35′25′′ W; thence 

southerly to 47°11′14′′ N, 122°35′50′′ W; 

thence easterly to the shoreline at 

47°11′14′′ N, 122°35′03′′ W; thence 

northerly along the shoreline to 

47°12′49′′ N, 122°34′39′′ W; thence 

westerly back to the point of origin. 

(b) Regulations. In accordance with 

the general regulations in 33 CFR part 

165, subpart C, no person or vessel may 

enter or remain in the security zone 

created by this section without the 

permission of the Captain of the Port or 

his Designated Representative. 

Designated Representatives are Coast 

Guard Personnel authorized by the 

Captain of the Port to grant persons or 

vessels permission to enter or remain in 

the security zone created by this section. 

See 33 CFR part 165, subpart C, for 

additional information and 

requirements. Vessels wishing to enter 

the zone must request permission for 

entry by contacting the Joint Harbor 

Operations Center at (206) 217–6001, or 

the on-scene patrol craft via VHF–FM 

Ch 13. If permission for entry is granted 

vessels must proceed at a minimum 

speed for safe navigation. 

(c) Enforcement Period. This rule will 

be enforced from 6 a.m. on June 14, 

2015, until 11 p.m. on June 22, 2015, 

unless canceled sooner by the Captain 

of the Port. 

Dated: January 27, 2015. 

M.W. Raymond, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Puget Sound. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02711 Filed 2–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0037; FRL–9922–87– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Butte County Air 

Quality Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS