alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
February 12, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the 
items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Opinion; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02797 Filed 2-6-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2004284EN.01002602.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/26

---

Action brought on 16 September 2004 by Bart Nijs against the Court of Auditors of the European Communities

(Case T-377/04)

(2004/C 284/52)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Court of Auditors of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 16 September 2004 by Bart Nijs, residing in Bereldange (Luxembourg), represented by Fränk Rollinger, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Court of Auditors, taken in the promotions exercise 2003 not to promote the applicant to the grade of translator-reviser (in 2003: LA5). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Court of Auditors, taken in the promotions exercise 2003 not to promote the applicant to the grade of translator-reviser (in 2003: LA5).

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of his action, the applicant alleges that, during the promotions exercise in question, the defendant conducted a comparative examination of the candidates' files, without taking account all of the factors liable to determine its decision, without regard for impartiality, on an unequal basis, neglecting the interests of the service and using information which was not comparable, as it allegedly came from a single reviser whose professional competence is contested by the applicant.

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Caliper LifeSciences, Inc.Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006**

·       CaliperLife Sciences Europe, incorporated in Belgium (wholly owned subsidiary ofCaliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

·       CaliperLife Sciences Benelux NV, incorporated in Belgium (wholly owned subsidiary ofCaliper Life Sciences Europe)

·       CaliperLife Sciences S.A., incorporated in France (wholly owned subsidiary of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc.)

·       CaliperLife Sciences GmbH, incorporated in Germany (wholly owned subsidiary of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc.)

·       CaliperLife Sciences AG, incorporated in Switzerland (wholly owned subsidiary ofCaliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

·       CaliperLife Sciences Ltd., incorporated in the United Kingdom (wholly owned subsidiaryof Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

·       CaliperLife Sciences Ltd., incorporated in Canada (wholly owned subsidiary of CaliperLife Sciences, Inc.)

·       NovaScreenBiosciences Corporation, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned subsidiary ofCaliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

·       MarizymeCorporation, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned subsidiary of NovaScreenBiosciences Corporation)

·       OceanixBiosciences Company, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned subsidiary of NovaScreenBiosciences Corporation)

·       XenogenCorporation, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned subsidiary of Caliper LifeSciences, Inc.)

·       XenogenBiosciences Corporation, incorporated in Ohio (wholly owned subsidiary ofCaliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

----
# C_2005031EN.01000303.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-56/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2005/C 31/08)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-56/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Banks and H. Huttunen) v Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski) – ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 10 February 2004 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthet, President of Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský (Judge Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 3.4.2004.

1

---
#### Craney, Respondent, vs. Kreger and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *John F. Kuehnl*and *Edward J.*Malloy, both of Kenosha.

For the respondent: *Randall, Cavanagh, Stephenson & Mittelstaed*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. KWMANE DEON MAYS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 18-3061 (D.C. No. 5:16-CR -40097-DDC-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Kwmane Deon Mays accepted a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement and pleaded guilty to one count of possessi on of a firearm by a prohibited person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) . He was sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release. But he violated the terms of his supervised release, and the district court revoked his supervised release and senten ced him to twelve months and one day of imprisonment and another eighteen months of supervised release. Although his plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, Mr. Mays appealed from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supe rvised release. The government moves

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 24, 2018
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 to enforce the app eal waiver under United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Under Hahn , we consider “(1) whether the di sputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; a nd (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarri age of justice.” Id. at 1325. We need not address a Hahn factor that the appellant does not contest. See United States v. Porter , 405 F.3d 1136, 1143 (10th Cir. 2005). In his response to the government’s moti on, Mr. Mays, through counsel, states that he does not object to the enforcement of the appeal waiver as to this direct appeal. He does not contest any of the Hahn factors. Accordingly, the motion to enforce is granted, and this matter is terminated.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
# C_2004300EN.01000701.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-173/02: Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 - Common organisation of the market for milk and milk products - Commission decision prohibiting aid to acquire milk quotas)

(2004/C 300/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-173/02: application for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 13 May 2002 between Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde) and Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J.L. Buendía Sierra) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Rosas and S.von Bahr, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 169 du 13.7.2002.

1

---
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721 

/0;PO F c- , -' HANDLE VIA 

Tap SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO COMPTROLLER 

24 November 1970 

MEHORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, PROGRAM D 

SUBJECT: Nov 70 Ex Com Decisions 

The Ex, Com made decisions on 20 Nov 70 for FY 1971 Funding, FY 1972 

Budget, and FY 73-76 Five Year Defense Program costing. The purpose of 

this memorandum is to inform you of those decisions pertinent to Director 

D involvement, with two particular qualifications: 

1. While Ex Com approved, the programs and costs are not necessarily 

the same as may be the basis for the FY 1972 President's Budget or the 

FYDP. You will be informed of any significant changes as they occur Q 

2. This notification does not constitute an approval of program 

changes nor revised funding'. However, it is a basis for requesting 

changes or revisions in accordance with established procedures, as appropriate. 

The decisions applicable to Director Dare: 

1. TAGBOARD. No change from July 70 Ex Com decision to fly 3 in 

FY 1971, but then place residual inventories in flyable storage for FY 72 

and 73. 

2. U-2 Aircraft. Concurrence in Option 3 for FY 72, and tentatively 

for FY 73-76 costing. This establishes funding protection for CIA flying 

5 U-2R1 s in photographic missions, and SAC flying 5 U-2R's as Comint-related 

(3 deployed to 1 Overseas Location), plus 2 U-2R1 s for Cuba and SEA photo 

coverage, subject to a future decision to deploy for Comint missions. Reexamine options for FY 73 thru 77 for the July 71 Ex Com. 

3. Area 51 Operations. Continue at FY 71 NRP funding levels. 

4. Depot support for CIA satellites. Continue essentially as 

planned (inherent in decisions). 

It appears that no Director D actions are necessary at this time as 

a result of these decisions, and that the next decision date will be 

TAGBOARD 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAr~ CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET tXClUOtO rl1,HA ""HIM"'jl,,- R(GRADING 

DOfi plnr( 1!l'r '1,(1,' '0 ,.n,., IH.U "''''''tV 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721 

CONTROL NO BYE 13266-70 

COpy r OF t/ COPIES 

PAGE 1 or 2 PAGES 

J ;..// 
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721 

HANDl E VIA 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

related to Comint deployment. 

Further specifics and optio~s will be included in the next budget 

call. 

HANDLE VIA 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET unlifHtl tllll~ "lHfl~~ql. Iif.GRAOING 

flHr~ pl~1 :1,'1 ',;~)O \f) no(:; ~In, asp!? 

Comptroller 

CONTROL NO BYE 13266-70 COpy Y OF---Iy'---_COPI£S 

PAGE 2 _ __ o. __ 2 __ PAGES 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721 
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 721
Product Name

Nanotube Dispersion

Description

A mixture of functionalized carbon nanotubes and other proprietary components dispersed in water. Product is formulated for use as an

intermediate in the preparation of Nanotube Formulations and for semiconductor spin-coating applications. FOR RESEARCH USE

ONLY.

Storage Conditions

Seal container when not in use. Store between 10 and 35°C. Do not store in direct sunlight. Do not freeze. Do not agitate, sonicate or

stir. Store separately, away from volatile organics.

Lot Information:

Document Number Date of Manufacture 13 October 2014

Product Code Manufacturer

Product Name Location

Lot Number Report Issue Date 15 January 2015

Raw Material Used:

Material Supplier Lot Numbers

Carbon Nanotubes

Raw material characterizations are not included in this datasheet.

Refer to the raw material Lot Characterization using the raw material Supplier Lot Number.
Rel
SEM Inspection 

Representative SEM Images of 72 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: 3000A SiO2

# Coats: 1 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-001

 SEM: SEM-001
SEM Inspection (cont.) 

Representative SEM Images of 72 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: 3000A SiO2

# Coats: 3 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-003

 SEM: SEM-001
SEM Inspection (cont.) 

Representative SEM Images of 72 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: 3000A SiO2

# Coats: 3 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-003

 SEM: SEM-001
SEM Inspection (cont.) 

Representative SEM Images of 72 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: TiN

# Coats: 5 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-013

 SEM: SEM-002
SEM Inspection (cont.) 

Representative SEM Images of 72 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: TiN

# Coats: 5 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-013

 SEM: SEM-002
Optical Inspection 

Representative Optical Microscope Images of 20 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: 3000A SiO2

# Coats: 3 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-001

 SEM: OM-001

 Bright Field with Nomarski filter at 50x 

Bright Field with Nomarski filter at 200x 
Optical Inspection (cont.) 

Representative Optical Microscope Images of 20 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: 3000A SiO2

# Coats: 3 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-001

 SEM: OM-001

 Dark Field at 50x 

Dark Field at 200x 
Optical Inspection (cont.) 

Representative Optical Microscope Images of 20 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: TiN

# Coats: 5 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-013

 SEM: OM-002

 Bright Field with Nomarski filter at 50x 

Bright Field with Nomarski filter at 200x 
Optical Inspection (cont.) 

Representative Optical Microscope Images of 20 total images examined, midway between center and edge

Substrate: TiN

# Coats: 5 coat

Test Method;

 Coat: CT-013

 SEM: OM-002

 Dark Field at 50x 

Dark Field at 200x
'. r"lxS:ClEr' .' 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE- Vw CFU{!;JC~ ,·>~.PtR. DESTIiOY 

DECLASSIFIED BY: CIIART OR CON[~CL bY' y~~~ 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JUL Y2012 0 

TO: 

FROM: 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISI~ 

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEPAR~ 

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION 

Memorandum 11400 

L. B.- MOlas~T'V--

A. T. Bassaro 

SEP 7 1971 

2 Septemb~r 1971 

'. SUBJECT:: RV-3· Recovery' Hook Structural Analysis.' 

A structural analysis of the RV-3 recovery hook revealed that the b end ina 

stresses developed in supporting the,weight of theRV in seawater will not 

exceed 5000 psi. S:f:nce typical structural steel has a yield strength of 35,.000-

psi, a sizeable margin of safety exists., 

ATB:glh. 

'::'·r. . ' •. _, .. " 

Prepared by: if .\ £ "is:JIIu If_ 

A. T •.. Basaaro- '" 

~: .. 

. .. , ..... 

Approved by: ~~., -::~~L2~ .. #:5 ;:zt~/~~ 2. ~.P 

P. To.. White 

.. . ... 

.,.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111521 

n,p SEGRET-

'T NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

llllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 14 00025921 D 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

HANDLE V!A 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Read Out Discussions with ITEK 

On May 8, 1969 I asked Messrs. W. Levinson and J. Wolf 

of ITEK to give me their thoughts on real time systems and solid 

state arrays. Mr. Levinson stated that they were working as contractors on the optics for the CBS system and for the MOS array. 

He pointed out that the solid state arrays cannot have the high 

packaging density of photo film so that the optics have to be at least 

twice the diameter when arrays are used compared to photo film. 

Mr. Levinson felt that he was not convinced a long life read out 

system is economical. We described the rationale for a read out 

system pointing out the increasing expenses of the photo system and 

the resulting pressure to come up with systems having long life in 

orbit. Mr. Levinson felt that general coverage in real time is impractical although a coarse -fine system might make some sense. 

He felt that the H system was being built to insane requirements 

because it would build up an automatic log jam in interpretation. 

Colonel Allen suggested that perhaps ITEK was not willing to make 

judgments because they had been hurt once by an interagency problem. 

I suggested they make an "Eyes Only" requirement to me. Mr. 

Levinson revealed that he is not now involved in ITEK's business with 

the Government and that he could make recommendations as an individual. He did not mean to be uncooperative but pointed out there 

was a danger. He also said he would talk to his people and see what 

contributions they could make. 

~6L 

John L. McLucas 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD D!RECTlVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111521 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1170 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1170 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re3 search Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CAN5 CER RESEARCH. 

6 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

8 SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL 

9 POSTAGE STAMP SALES ARE USED FOR 

10 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

11 Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is 

12 amended in the matter following subparagraph (B) by 

13 adding at the end the following: ‘‘An agency that receives 

14 amounts from the Postal Service under this paragraph 

15 shall use the amounts for breast cancer research.’’. 

Passed the Senate September 22, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1170 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend 

cancer research, and for other purposes. to issue a semipostal to raise funds for breast the authority of the United States Postal Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         672,490
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,870,803
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,050,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,001,164
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,997,000
<LOANS>                                     46,304,594
<ALLOWANCE>                                    230,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,067,156
<DEPOSITS>                                  41,788,559
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,182,160
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,422,654
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,673,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              68,067,156
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                962,484
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              253,367
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                69,517
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,285,368
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             489,108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             490,005
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          795,363
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                332,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                478,718
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     478,718
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   302,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.73
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    31,297
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               225,352
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      492
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              230,860
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           230,860
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>