alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: CIIART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 .JULY 2012 

,'·a.J.BJ eeT: Study of P.adar Imagery 

You are requested to plan a study of the probleci of 

iu tarpreting imagery fran synthetic-arr"lY (side looking) 

rii.d,~r8. lbe princlpa.l int.erest in these s tuuies is ill 

J.ru.1 ges havi.ng a :ceS<Jlution of 25 feet or bet car, dnd in 

military t~tq~ets .1ppropriato to tl"};lt resolution. Ali 

i.mportant intelligence objeeti,ve is to sens.e ctwnges in 

.. dr and naval Ordel". of battle, cr-.ange.s III m<tjor transpor t 

, ;activity) and the presenee of heavy [llilic.ary equipment. 

fests should determine how well this objective can be met, 

,lnd wl1.<l t ki.nd of base of pri.m4ry da tel is required. 

It "lill be necessary fu:st to learn \;'L, l; Jtudies have 

made to determine wha.t iJnl.:lgery is now .1vailable 

- e.g. from for possible furth.eranalysis J and 

what radars are now operating that could hp \''I~ed for eo thering further <-lac.... Al.-my and Navy sources should be ex..unined J 

a.s well as {~ir For:ce. w11en this in£ol.-mation is ~1ssembled, 

I \'1il1· "t1ant to discuss plans for such studies dB seem 

required. 

Brock'WJY hcLilLu~ 

d i:r ac to'L' 

:;! tj .. Ol.kll l'.eco-H.naiss,tflCe Office 

" • '~. J •. I,
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1247 

To designate Union Station in Washington, DC, as ‘‘Harry S. Truman 

Union Station’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate Union Station in Washington, DC, as ‘‘Harry 

S. Truman Union Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HARRY S. TRUMAN UNION STATION. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—Union Station, located at 40 

5 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC, shall be 

6 known and designated as ‘‘Harry S. Truman Union Sta7 tion’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1247 IS

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harry S. Truman 

2 Union Station’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-

~ I I . Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08542 

~c~'l I 

SOLAR RADIATION VI EXPERIMENT 

The experiments scheduled for the NRL Solar Radiation VI Satellite 

are mainly a continuation of solar monitoring studies first carried out 

successfully in the 1960 ETA-2 Satellite. These studies have as their 

goal the determination of the t i me hist ory of the sun's x-ray and ultravi olet fuuissions. It has already been found that solar x-ray emission 

is the most sensitive index of solar acti vity known. It is to be 

expected that more detailed analysis of the various phenomena comprising 

solar activity by means of this x-ray tool will help in our understanding 

of solar events and wi ll aid in t he prediction of safe travel in space. 

The set of experiments scheduled for SR-VI include a main experiment 

and three secondary experiments. The main experiment i s a study of the 

hardness spectrum of the solar x-ray emission and of its time variation. 

This study wi ll be carried out with ion chamber x-ray detectors covering 

the following nominal spectral bands: 

0.1 - 1.6 A 

0·5 - 3.0 A 

2.0 - 6.0 A 

2.0 - B.o A 

B.o - 16.0 A 

44.0 - 60.0 A 

The outputs of the above chambers will be telemetered to earth in real 

time. A comparison of the outputs of t hese chambers should provide a 

measure of the effective emission temperature. This will provide a 

measure of cooling rates, which in turn may permit determination of 

whether collisional or adiabatic cooling processes are dominant. 

The following secondary experiments are also planned for SR-VI. 

To test the effectiveness of magnetic shielding for the x-ray ion 

chambers a 2-B A x-ray ion chamber will be flown behind a dummy magnet. 

To provide data on variations in the longwave solar x-ray emission a 

magnetically protect ed 44-60 A x-ray detector will be flown. 

; , , - ""ardle v.., 8 ~ EM Aa-.J 

cont .... ol S"faterY"\ on~ 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08542
a 55 ||

13 April 1965

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

Walt Levison called concerning the transfer of the
two 66" Lanyard lenses oa He registered a mild
objection to furnishing lenses to a competitor. I told
him I would consider Iteks feelings next times however,
he agreed that the lenses are government Property and we
can do anything we like with them.

7.
Z

fener jf JomNSON
Majors’ USAF .

ca

/
r "011 I'

Ise., „If $AF53 1

• 1 of An% .....

.",s f.g. • • - is

Asismipastairi

.....4 ; ./ fi: - J .- 

F: ..• . i. ,. i•

•

- • . • .; F.1......_ •

e • :eta f

2

•

023177 ZEA 11 I ST

• I XXXXX ZFA

r-TER0 FIVE Ta0

r. .4 •• .2 ti

•

.9

.hvcx: 6391 GR De

0

UNDER HE AUTHORITY CICANTCO Iq 

TTEWIEQ REFERENCE0 (MACE, TO MAIN THE tAtilmaylos 

ar Cu AND MISCELLANEOUS 500r FflP THE- SP TIME ECIFICATIONS AND SCHEMATIC LITUAIllYgLAML___THLLRECC

cCAL REPRESENTATIVE (LT CEL M:AS-OENICD--- nao D rrivAN g IN SPITE CF THE

.IA LS kA IN HIS OPMIGN HE DOES NOT NAVE MIS AUTHORITY At1 

Si ALIVE I RET.IIRES SPECIFIC 0:115p010862411SMEAD 191.1. RELEASE ITEMS or CUARIERS-SCrORC-HE THIS NATURE TO AEROSPACE. 2. RECUEST YOu TAXE APPROPRIATr 'MOM TA

DECIR TION'

eAS ACCESS TO N

ECESSARY IECNNICAL DATA TO FULFILL THE DIRECTION 

AS SPrCIF/EP In lrF_irritrn TAX_ MA Tide am,* l e

 T 

KE AMOSIINCE-414 ranTED. 0:

4:TivITIES AND FUTURE CONTRICUTIONS IN THE APP AREA ARE

N

 DRASTICALLY 1..2.mfT-17-

-s-e-e-R-E-IT-
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joe Kaeser, Chief Financial Officer of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 30, 2011



/s/    JOE KAESERJoe Kaeser Chief Financial
Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P.

A/K/A DENMAN PROPANE §

§

§

§

§

§ 08

- 13

- 00061

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas,

and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We

therefore direct the trial court to vacate its order granting motion for new trial dated January 22,

2013, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue should the

trial court fail to comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51304 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. SILVERIO MORALES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1106-1 Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Silverio Morales raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51304

2 Thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance, which relies on inapposite authority, is DENIED.
#### Royal Neon Electric Signs, Inc., Appellant, vs. Plouf and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Samuil Nissenbaum*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents : *Lyman G. Wheeler*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7876-7877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey; Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 7877]]

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially 
file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to 
protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the 
plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

DATES: Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat 
described in this notice will happen on March 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or 
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plat, in 2 sheets, and field notes of 
the dependent resurvey and survey in Townships 12 and 13 South, Ranges 
66 and 67 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, were accepted on 
January 16, 2015.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2015-02940 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at the North Anna ESP Site (NUREG-1835)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0207 

HELEN WEEMS AND JANE DOE, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through AUSTIN 

KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as Attorney 

General; and TRAVIS R. AHNER, in his official 

capacity as County Attorney for Flathead County, 

Defendants and Appellants. 

FILL.L) 

NOV 1 0 2022 

Bowen GreerAcod

< of FL rer Court 

S,ate o. rvInntarla 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on 

Wednesday, December 14, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. in the courtroom of the Montana Supreme 

Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building, Helena, Montana. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M. R. App. P. 17(3), oral argurnent 

times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellants and thirty (30) 

minutes for the Appellees. 

Counsel should be mindful of the provisions of M. R. App. P. 17(6). 

The Court will not entertain any motions to reschedule. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mike Menahan, District Judge. 

DATED this/V..‘ day of November, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

11/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0207
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         627,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,271,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,591,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,621,000
<PP&E>                                      33,644,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,446,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,972,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,397,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        91,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,197,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,972,000
<SALES>                                     64,417,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,417,000
<CGS>                                       41,942,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,942,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,179,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,174,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   481,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            693,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   693,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                    0001004539
<NAME>                   AIRPLANES LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   260
<PP&E>                                            4433
<DEPRECIATION>                                     990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              122
<BONDS>                                           4101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3718
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   140
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       79
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (31)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (31)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140952 

1:Jt:lutl::iH - B Y:t.;MA.N 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/SS 

9 August 1973 

SUBJECT: General Bradburn's Letter on Ethics 

Dr. McLucas was very pleased with General Bradburn's 

actions as outlined in the message on ethics. He noted that 

General Bradburn was concerned about the problem, and Dr. 

McLucas was "glad to see" this concern. Dr. McLucas read 

the message verbatim to his Execs and Mr. Stempler, and went 

into a lengthy discussion concerning the implications of the 

message. 

Dr. McLucas questioned whether the first sentence of 

paragraph 2.C. was really true. He and Mr. Stempler discussed what, if any, legal advice was available in the organization to determine the legality of operations. Dr. 

McLucas requested that Mr. Stempler look into the question, 

and suggested that he take part in a future trip to the West 

Coast to personally examine the operation from a legal standpoint. Although not specifically stated, I would assume that 

the question of legality also applied to our operations in 

SAF. 

Dr. McLucas mentioned a recent article in U. S. News 

and World Report and noted that this article - which had 

only one major flaw - showed that the program is working as 

intended, e.g., everybody knows about it, but nothing has 

been confirmed. Mr. Stempler stated that while a certain 

amount of "deviousness" may be required, caution should be 

exercised that we don't go overboard on it - e.g., don't be 

devious just because it's fun to do so. 

Request that a letter be prepared acknowledging General 

Bradburn's message. Since Mr. Stempler was brought into the 

action, it may be beneficial to coordinate the letter with him. 

LI 

DONALD J. KUTYNA 

Lt Colonel, USAF 

Executive Assistant 

SECM:Y - BYEMAN 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140952
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15714]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS

Amendment to the 2013 Tariff Preference Level (TPL) for Nicaragua 
Under the Central America-Dominican Republic-United States Free Trade 
Agreement (CAFTA-DR)

AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).

ACTION: Amending the 2013 TPL for Nicaragua.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dates: Effective Date:July 1, 2013.
SUMMARY: This notice reduces the 2013 TPL for Nicaragua to 98,447,866 
square meters equivalent to account for the shortfall in meeting the 
one-to-one commitment for cotton and man-made fiber woven trousers 
exported from Nicaragua to the United States

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Stetson, International Trade 
Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, (202) 482-2582.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Annex 3.28 of the CAFTA-DR; Section 1634(a)(2) and 
(c)(2) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-280); 
Presidential Proclamation 8111 of February 28, 2007.
    Background: Annex 3.28 of the CAFTA-DR establishes a TPL for non-
originating apparel goods of Nicaragua. Section 1634(a)(2) of the 
Pension Protection Act references the exchange of letters between the 
United States and Nicaragua, which establishes the one-to-one 
commitment for cotton and man-made fiber trousers. Section 1634(c)(2) 
of the Pension Protection Act authorizes the President to proclaim a 
reduction in the overall limit in the TPL if the President determines 
that Nicaragua has failed to comply with the one-to-one commitment. In 
Presidential Proclamation 8111, the President delegated to CITA the 
authority to determine whether Nicaragua had failed to comply with the 
one-to-one commitment and to reduce the overall limit in the TPL.
    In an exchange of letters dated March 24 and 27, 2006, Nicaragua 
agreed that for each square meter equivalent (SME) of exports of cotton 
and man-made fiber woven trousers entered under the TPL, Nicaragua 
would export to the United States an equal amount of cotton and man-
made fiber woven trousers made of U.S. formed fabric of U.S. formed 
yarn. Any shortfall in meeting this commitment that was not rectified 
by April 1 of the succeeding year would be applied against the TPL for 
the succeeding year. For 2012, the shortfall in meeting the one-to-one 
commitment is 1,552,134 square meters equivalent. This amount is being 
deducted from the 2013 TPL, resulting in a new TPL level for 2013 of 
98,447,866 square meters equivalent.

Kim Glas,
Chairman Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 2013-15714 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Drainage Water Management, Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management, Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.