alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~I'h'l~/////////////////////////////~ Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051148 

REFERRED TO 

OFFICE 

TOP SECRET 

CONTROL NO. 

RECEIVED RELEASED 

SIGNATURE DATE TIME DATE TIME 

SEEN BY 

NAME & OFFICE SYMBOL DATE 

L-____________ J-____________________ -J ____ -L ____ -L ____ -L __ ._~ _____________________ ~ __ ~ 

Handle Via Indicated Controls 

BYE 

Access to this docu ment 

cleared for 

will be restricted to those 

the specific projects; 

persons 

............•........ ..................... . ................... . 

..••.....•...•.•...•. 

WARNING 

This document contains information affecting the national security of the United States within the meaning 

of the espionage lows u. S. Code Title 18, Sections 793 and 794. The law prohibits its transmission or 

the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner 

prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the 

detriment of the United States. It is to be seen only by personnel especially indoctrinated and authorized 

to receive information in the deSIgnated controf channels. Its security must be maintained in accordance 

with regulations pertaining to BYEMAN Control System. 

TOP SECRET 
"\0.'" 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114821 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

29 January 1965 

MEMORANDUM FOR BRIG GEN STEWART 

/""" <~ r 

VIA: COL W0!P-'-HMAN:~! l t-t'bb5' 

SUBJECT: Tagboard Test Program/Contingency Plan 

Re your question contained in attached note. 

A contingency plan for Tagboard Test program has been 

prepared - see attached. I understand that Col Geary discussed this with Dr. McMillan and in fact the quoted 

language in paragraph 2 is Dr. McMillan's. 

I think we should delineate between those contingency 

plans for state-side test, .proflrams and those which concern 

actual operations over de~ areas. I see no reason for 

ICPC consideration of the former. I think such matters 

are solely the business of the Program Directorate - and 

of course the j)i?) D/NRO. 7 

1 Atch - . .".........-" 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114821 
· .~~l U"'~. ' . ~.; Iff ~~ .'fi ~ .-.;"", 

_ ...... J'"Ipproved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114821 

~$ 

~ , ~-~. 

", ... ~~. 

DEPARTMENT 0 

OffiCE Of THE UNDER SECRETARY 

MEMORANDUM 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114821
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - RIN 0648-XA428 

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that The University of Alaska Museum of the North, 907 Yukon Drive Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960 (Link Olson, Responsible Party) has been issued a minor amendment to Scientific Research Permit No. 14301-01. 

# ADDRESSES:

The amendment and related documents are available for review upon written request or by appointment in the Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone: (301) 427-8401; fax: (301) 713-0376. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brendan Hurley or Jennifer Skidmore; phone: (301) 427-8401. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The requested amendment has been granted under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361*et seq.*) and the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).                 

Permit No. 14301 (74 FR 65748), authorizes the permit holder to collect, receive, import, or export marine mammal parts for scientific research purposes from all species under NMFS' jurisdiction. Import/export activities may occur world-wide. No live animals are authorized to be harassed or taken, lethally or otherwise, under the permit. This minor amendment (No. 14301-02) extends the duration of the permit one year, through December 31, 2015, but does not change any other terms or conditions of the permit. 

Dated: February 9, 2015. 

Perry F. Gayaldo, 

Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2015-03018 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-3221

___________ Thomas P. Taylor, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 7, 2012 Filed: June 26, 2012

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Thomas P. Taylor appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemen t security income. Upon de novo review,
see Van Vickle v. Astrue , 539 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir. 2008), we agree with the district court that substantial evid ence on the record as a whole supports the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that Taylor was not disabled. Specifically, we

1 The Honorable Erin Setser, United Stat es Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).conclude that it was proper for the ALJ to give little weight to the opinions of neuropsychologist Vann Smith and soci al worker Dianne Martan, see Kirby v. Astrue , 500 F.3d 705, 709 (8th Cir. 2007) (consulti ng physician’s opinion deserves no special weight); cf. Perkins v. Astrue , 648 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir. 2011) (treating physician’s opinion is given controlling weight if it is not inconsistent with other substantial evidence); and that the ALJ’s determinati on of Taylor’s residual functional capacity (RFC) was consistent with the relevant evidence, see Jones v. Astrue , 619 F.3d 963, 971 (8th Cir. 2010) (it is ALJ’s responsibility to determine RFC based on all relevant evidence, including medical records, observa tions of treating physicians and others, and claimant’s own description of his limitations; record must contain some medical evidence that supports ALJ’s determination); see also Halverson v. Astrue , 600 F.3d 922, 930-31 (8th Cir. 2010) (global assess ment of functioning scores may be of considerable help in ALJ’s formulation of RFC, but they are not essential to RFC’s accuracy). We reject as meritless Taylo r’s contention that he met or medically equaled the requirements for Listing 12.06. Cf. Vandenboom v. Barnhart , 421 F.3d 745, 750 (8th Cir. 2005) (summarily rejecti ng appellant’s conclusory assertion that ALJ failed to consider whether he met certain listings, where appellant provided no analysis of relevant law or facts). We thus affirm the district court, and we deny Taylor’s motion to supplement the record.

______________________________

-2-
```

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                               OF INCOME PER SHARE

                                           Three Months      Three Months      Six Months       Six Months
                                              Ended             Ended            Ended             Ended
                                          June 30, 2006     June 30, 2005     June 30, 2006    June 30, 2005

Net income                                 $  618,000        $  298,000        $  964,000       $  453,000
                                           ==========        ==========        ==========       ==========

INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC
------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period                           5,686,561         5,470,311         5,615,311        5,470,311
                                           ==========        ==========        ==========       ==========

Income per common share -
Basic                                      $      .11        $      .05        $      .17       $      .08
                                           ==========        ==========        ==========       ==========

INCOME  PER SHARE - DILUTED
---------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period                           5,686,561         5,470,311         5,615,311        5,470,311

Effect of stock options
    dilution                                  139,082                 0           131,796                0
                                           ----------        ----------        ----------       ----------

Total shares outstanding for
purposes of calculating diluted
earnings                                    5,825,643         5,470,311         5,747,107        5,470,311
                                           ==========        ==========        ==========       ==========

Income  per common and common
equivalent share - Diluted                 $      .11        $      .05        $      .17       $      .08
                                           ==========        ==========        ==========       ==========
```
, 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

Hx SECRET " . ( 

WORKING PAPER, DESTROY 

OR CONTROL BY 1/-)-0-71 OPttCAL TECHNOLOGY DIvISION 

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 

Memo I 0011 

20 August 1971 

TO: DISTRIBUTION 

FROM: W.A. Izzo 

SUBJECT: RECOVERY OF RV-3 - Minutes of Proposal Meeting 

Per-the meeting held 19 August the following schedule for 

this effort was established: 

Design complete 

Fabrication complete 

Test complete 

On Site 

Final R.eport 

27 August 1971 

23 September 

27 September 

lOctober 

30 November 

A review of estimates resulted in the following "first cut" 

costs: 

Dept/Sect. Title 

Manufacturing 

Test 

Quality Assurance 

Design & Drafting 

Opto-Mechanical . 

Technical Doc. 

Systems Analysis 

Change COQtrol 

Dept/Sect. No. 

8763 

8555 

8611 

8526 

8523 

8581 

8541 

8493 

Manmonths 

1.-0 

.7 

.7 

1.5 

1.5 

.5 

.8 

.2 

6.9 

The Program Plan was presented by Len Kolaskey, and consideration was given to alternate methods and to possible problem areas which 

could arise. 

Len Molaskey will review the cost situation and advise as to 

further action. 

DISTR.IBUTION: 

A. Bassaro 

E. Collins 

A. D'Aquila 

J. Jack 

L. Molaskey 

J. Shanley 

B. Todd Hx SECRET 

W.A. Izzo
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2000 included  herein and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    200
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                580,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                        117,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        488,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                               337,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                            124,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          488,038
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       80,453
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          24,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       19,512 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     20,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         4,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     4,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            4,608
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.29
<FN>
<F1> Depreciation and amortization
</FN>


</TABLE>
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL
CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF
AUTOMOBILE LOAN RECEIVABLES


The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and maintaining 
the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected 
benefits and related costs of control procedures.  The objectives of an 
internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but 
not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from 
unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in 
accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit 
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles.

We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Bank's 
internal control structure based on the criteria established in Internal 
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") relative to the servicing 
of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trusts
Series 1995-1, 1995-2, 1996-1, 1996-2, 1997-1, 1997-2, 1997-3 and 1997-4 
(collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 1998, 
and we have determined that the Bank maintained an effective internal 
control structure over financial reporting relative to the servicing of 
automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of September 30, 1998.

However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal
control structure, including the possibility of human error and the 
circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an effective 
internal control structure can provide only reasonable assurance with 
respect to reliability of financial statements and safeguarding and 
management of assets.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of any internal 
control structure can change with changes in circumstances.



                                     					                                    
Kevin B. Cashen        Larry C. Cain	
Senior Vice President  Senior Vice President



                                     					                                    
George P. Clancy, Jr.      Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
Executive Vice President   Executive Vice President and
                           Chief Financial Officer

November 18, 1998
# C_2005045EN.01000402.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-460/02: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
   (1)

Commission of the European Communities

Italian Republic

1

(Air transport - Groundhandling - Directive 96/67/EC)

(2005/C 45/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-460/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 19 December 2002, between Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Aresu and M. Huttunen) and Italian Republic (Agents: I.M. Braguglia and O. Fiumara) – the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), K. Lenaerts, S. von Bahr and K. Schiemann, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Italian Republic

| 1. | Declares that in so far as Legislative Decree No 18 of 13 January 1999 applying Directive 96/67/EC on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports incorporates, at Article 14, a social measure which is incompatible with Article 18 of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 and sets out, at Article 20, interim provisions which are not authorised under the directive, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that in so far as Legislative Decree No 18 of 13 January 1999 applying Directive 96/67/EC on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports incorporates, at Article 14, a social measure which is incompatible with Article 18 of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 and sets out, at Article 20, interim provisions which are not authorised under the directive, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000350194
<NAME>                   United Systems Technology, Inc.
       
<S>                      <C>               <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS          3-MOS       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1997   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-31-1998    MAR-31-1997   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        228992              0        204807
<SECURITIES>                       0              0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                 159025              0        216693  
<ALLOWANCES>                       0              0             0
<INVENTORY>                        0              0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              407560              0        427665
<PP&E>                         74944              0         85940
<DEPRECIATION>                 68336          68336        159579  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                978818              0       1053265   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1134638              0       1210749
<BONDS>                        50000              0         50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0             0
<PREFERRED>                   130000              0        130000
<COMMON>                     4317803              0       4317803
<OTHER-SE>                         0              0             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  978818              0       1053265
<SALES>                        76983          44551             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              418252         363160             0
<CGS>                          39127          17434             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 402255         442448             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1015           (997)            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1133           1529             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0              0             0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0              0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0              0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0             0
<CHANGES>                          0              0             0
<NET-INCOME>                   17012         (80285)            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0              0             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0              0             0
                

</TABLE>
# C_2005106EN.01002105.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/21

---

Removal from the register of Case C-246/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 106/45)

(Language of the case: Greek)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 19 November 2004, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-246/03: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 02.08.2003.

1

---
DEPARTMENT OF 

/^MfjSPOR TATION 

^"AE T OPERATIONS 

^^510 r-T -L, p 2:5LJ 

August 5, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, SW, Suite 10200 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the California Airports Council, we would like to express our strong support for the 

Ventura County - Oxnard Airport application for a grant under the Department of 

Transportation Small Community Air Service Development Grant Program. A grant from the 

program will greatly assist the airport in its effort to bring new commercial air service to their 

community and closing a gap in the California air transportation system. 

The Oxnard Airport recently lost commercial air service, leaving a region of 800,000 with no 

options within Ventura County. Community residents must now travel south to Los Angeles 

County or north to Santa Barbara County for commercial airline service, increasing road 

congestion and negatively impacting local air quality. Commercial air service to this region 

could mean a positive economic impact to the community well in excess of $6.4M annually, and 

restore air service that until recently has been provided from Oxnard Airport since 1946. 

A grant to Ventura County - Oxnard Airport will be a boost for California commercial aviation at 

a time when it is sorely needed. We urge your thoughtful consideration of their application. 

Thank you for your time and attention, 

Sincerely, 

John Martin 

President 

15)0 14th Street Sacramento, CA 958?4 

Tel. 916.553.4999 Fax 916.447.4947 

www.calairportscouncH.org