alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM WHITE *vs.*GEORGE WHITE.

A parol sale and delivery of a slave, made by the tenant for life and remainder man is valid; for the act of 1784, 1 Rev. St. ch. 37, sec. 19, does not prevent a parol conveyance of slaves from being good between the parties thereto; but if it did, the act of 1792, 1 Rev. St. ch. 37, sec. 19, declares *bom fide*sales of slaves accompanied by delivery, good without a bill of sale, and the act of 1819, 1 Rev. St. ch. 50, sec. 8, to avoid parol contracts for the sale of lands and slaves, does not affect the question, as that act applies to executory contracts only, and not to contracts executed.

Detinue for two slaves, Lucy and Baceus, tried at Ire-dell, on the last circuit, before his honor Judge Dick.

The plaintiff claimed the slaves in question under the will *428of his father, John White, deceased, who bequeathed the wo-1 man Lucy to his wife for life, and after her death to the plaintiff. For the plaintiff it was proved that Lucy and Bacons were jn the defendant’s possession, and that the action had been brought within less than three years from the death of the testator’s widow; and further, that Baccus was a child of Lucy, born after the defendant had taken her into possession. For the defendant it was then proved that the testator was indebted, in his life-time, to one Robert Simonton; and for the purpose of securing the debt, mortgaged to him the woman Lucy and another girl; and that, after the testator’s death, his widow and the plaintiff, to discharge the said debt, sold and delivered Lucy to Simonton, from whom the defendant afterwards purchased her.

Dec. 1839

His Honor charged the jury that if they believed, from the evidence, that the testator’s widow and the plaintiff together sold and delivered the woman LuCy to Simonton, the title passed to Simonton, although there was no bill *of sale;*and that the plaintiff was not entitled.to recover. The plaintiff, in submission to this opinion, suffered a nonsuit and appealed.

*Badger*for the plaintiff.

*Bnyden*for the defendant.

Gaston, Judge.

We assent entirely to the opinion expressed in the Court below. On common law principles we see no ground upon which the plaintiff can invalidate the sale made by himself and the tenant for life. It is not af-. fected by the act of 1784, 1 Rev. St. ch. 37, sec. 19, because under that act a parol conveyance of slaves is good between the parties thereto. If it were not, the act of 1792. 1 Rev. Stat. ch. 37, sec. 19, declares *bona fide*sales of slaves, accompanied by delivery, good without a bill of sale. The act of 1819, to avoid parol contracts for the sale of lands and slaves, did not go into operation until the 1st of January, 1821; and if it had been in operation before the sale in question, it would not have applied thereto; for executed contracts are not embraced within its purview. *Choat*v. *Wright,*2 Dev. 289. *Mushat*v. *Brevard,*4 Dev. 73.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005019EN.01003001.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/30

---

Action brought on 13 October 2004 by French Republic against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-425/04)

(2005/C 19/64)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 October 2004 by the French Republic, represented by its Agents Ronny Abraham, Géraud de Bergues and Stéphanie Ramet, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in its entirety Commission Decision No C(2004)360 of 2 August 2004 concerning State aid paid by France to France Télécom; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety Commission Decision No C(2004)360 of 2 August 2004 concerning State aid paid by France to France Télécom;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of its action, the applicant relies, first, on an infringement of essential procedural requirements and the rights of the defence. According to the applicant, the Commission based its decision on factors, namely ministerial proposals of 12 July 2002, which are outside the scope of the procedure as defined by the decision to open the procedure. The applicant claims that the Commission should have extended the procedure by adopting a new decision to open it.

The applicant also relies on an error of law in relation to the concept of State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC. According to the applicant, the Commission wrongly applied the principle of the private investor who is fully informed of the conditions of a market economy. According to the applicant, since the ministerial proposals did not amount to a commitment on the part of the State and could not be categorised as State aid, the principle of the fully-informed private investor was not applicable. The applicant also maintains that the Commission wrongly held there to be aid on the basis of two separate events which, taken separately, it would have to accept did not comprise the elements necessary for the categorisation of State aid to apply. Those events are the statements of July 2002 and the draft shareholder's advance of December 2002.

Thirdly, the applicant claims that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment when it took the view that an analysis of the contents of the interview of 12 July 2002 allowed it to be concluded that the State was giving an undertaking as a shareholder, which would have had an influence on the markets in December.

Lastly, the applicant submits that the reasoning adopted contains contradictions and inadequacies which lead to the contested decision being vitiated on the ground of a lack of proper reasoning.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,460
<PP&E>                                       2,284,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 988,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,519,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,449
<BONDS>                                        566,914
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,392
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,519,097
<SALES>                                        225,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,854
<CGS>                                           22,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,201)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,021
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.4
CERTIFICATION I, Thomas T. Higgins, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caliper Life
Sciences, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report. Date: April 29, 2005/s/ Thomas T. HigginsThomas T. HigginsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) .
Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region 

Federal. Aviation Administration 

Date I zlt.·r 1-w II 

I / 

1 AVicition Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Brendan Airways, LLC· 2011 EA170024 

Subject: Fjnal Notjce of Proposed Civj! Penalty 

Response Attachment 

In reply to your Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Brend~n Airways, LLCelects to pr~ceed as indicate.d by its check n1ark beside 

the numbered paragraph below; · 

l.U 

2.~ 

Brendan Airways, LLC hereby submits the amount of the proposed civil penalty with the understanding that an Order 

Assessing Civil Penalty will be issued in that amount. . 

Brendan Airways, LLC hereby requests a fonnal hearing in accordance with Section 13.16 of the Federal Aviation 

Regu!ations. 

By sending this form to the Federal Aviation Administration, Eastern Reelon, Brendan 

Airways, LLC also hereby certifies that a copy of this form has been filed with the Hearlne 

Docket Clerk (Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 

S,W., Roo·m 924A, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk); 

** Please note that Brendan Airways LLC wjl! not be entitled to a hearing if it files tbjs form wjth the Federal Ayjatjon 

Admjnjstrat\on 

~ 

Eastern Reg jon WITHOUT haying med tbjs foon or a. written request for a hearjng wjtb the HEARING DOCKET . 

A TTORNEYIREPRESENTATIVE 

RECEIVED 

JAN 13 2012 

HEARING DOCKET
Final: 12/12/03

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

Consumer use expected?
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER:P040139
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P040139
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER:P040139
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER:P040139
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 4 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER:P040139
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P040139
##### 



Exhibit 10.7(a)
 First Amendment to the  Third Amended and Restated Severance Pay Plan
 Whereas Corporation Existing Plan
 Whereas Board
 Whereas Amendment
 Now, Therefore
 Amendment of Section 1.01 of the Existing Plan Benefit Service
 Benefit Service plus provided, however
 Effect of Amendments
 Binding Effect
 Severability




---



##### 



Governing Law To The Extent Not Superseded By The Laws Of The United
States, This Amendment Shall Be Construed and Enforced in Accordance With, and the Rights
of the Parties Shall Be Governed By, the Internal Laws of the State of Texas, Without Reference to
Principles of Conflicts of Law.
 In Witness Whereof
 Sterling Chemicals, Inc./s/ Richard K. Crump
Richard K. Crump, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
 -2-
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

, ' .-**~** ,-.,

In The Matter Of, DocketNo. FAAA-2015-0638 Judge J.E. Sullivan PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT TRANSPORT, INC. FAA Case No. 2014S0190149 Respondent.

WAIVER OF HEARING , i I_,

COMES NOW, the Respondent, Professional Flight Transport, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel and hereby waives any request for any hearing based uponthe settlement of this matter. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Waiver ofHearing was sent: Origillal and one copy viaU.S. mail to: Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000
one copy viaU.S. mail: Christopher R. Stevenson Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southern Region P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320MARKB. GOLDSTEIN, P.A. Attorney for Respondent, Professional Flight Transport, Inc. 2700N. Military Trail, Suite 130 BocaRaton, Florida 33431 Telephone (561) 989-9955 Telefax (561) 989-9966 Emaill: mbg@bizavlaw.com Email2: intake@bizavlaw.com By: /s/ MarkB. Goldstein MARKB. GOLDSTEIN, ESQU. " Florida BarNo. 705276 

# j/
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,257,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,653,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                   258,000
<INVENTORY>                                    736,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,706,049
<PP&E>                                       4,353,250
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,019,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,858,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,882,470
<BONDS>                                      3,823,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,563
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,957,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,858,502
<SALES>                                      8,576,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,702,223
<CGS>                                        5,506,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,670,795<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               140,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,542,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,200,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (319,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,881,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,881,840)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.63)
<FN>
<F1>Excludes translation gain of $450,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                  EarthWatch Incorporated, dba DigitalGlobe
              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                           (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                  Period From
                                                                                                January 1, 1995
                                                          Year Ended December 31,               (Inception) to
                                         ---------------------------------------------------      December 31,
                                              1997       1998       1999      2000      2001           2001
                                              ----       ----       ----      ----      ----     ---------------
<S>                                      <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>      <C>             <C>
Pre-tax Income (Loss)                    $(50,731)  $ (12,920)  $(20,319)  $79,682  $(49,290)       $ (87,193)
                                         ===================================================      ===============

Fixed Charges:
  Interest Expense                       $     86   $   1,340   $  5,482   $ 4,492  $  4,726        $  16,215
  Capitalized Interest                      5,670       6,056     11,340    24,329    12,408           59,948
  Rent                                        410         341        385       470       357            2,380
                                         ---------------------------------------------------      --------------
Total Fixed Charges                      $  6,166   $   7,737   $ 17,207   $29,291  $ 17,491        $  78,543
                                         ====================================================     ==============
Earnings, as Defined                     $(50,235)  $ (11,239)  $(14,452)  $84,644  $(44,207)       $ (68,598)
                                         ====================================================     ==============
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              -           -          -     2.89x         -                -
Deficiency of Earnings to Fixed Charges  $(56,401)  $ (18,976)  $(31,659)        -  $(61,698)       $(147,141)
</TABLE>
#### Estate of Martin: Shuckhart, Appellant, vs. Estate of Martin, Respondent.

. For the appellant: L. *H. Bancroft*of Richland Center.

For the respondent: *Sidney J. Hanson,*attorney, and O. *D. Black,*guardian *ad litem*for minor heirs, both of Rich-land Center.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# Civil Rights 

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About NRCS 
-  Civil Rights  

          -  About NRCS               -  Careers 
            -  Civil Rights  
            -  Farm Bill 
            -  History 
            -  Leadership 
            -  Partner With Us 
            -  Priorities 
            -  NRCS Strategic Plan 

Across USDA, civil rights ensures equal employment opportunities and program access for all employees and customers. It ensures that every employee, applicant, and program participant is treated with dignity, equality, and respect.

From NRCS, as well as support from the Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center and USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, customers and employees have many resources regarding civil rights.

## NRCS National Civil Rights Advisory Committee to the Chief

The National Civil Rights Advisory Committee to the Chief (NCRACC) is designed to provide management officials and employees with counsel and advice to enhance and ensure compliance with their equal employment opportunity and program delivery responsibilities.

## FPAC’s Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Division

The FPAC Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Division (CREEOD) ensures equal employment opportunities and program access for all FPAC employees and customers. It ensures that every employee, applicant, and program participant is treated with dignity, equality, and respect by enforcing Civil Rights (CR) and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) statutes, protected federal laws, policies, management directives, and executive orders.

## USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

The mission of the USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (OASCR) is to provide leadership and direction for the fair and equitable treatment of all USDA customers and employees while ensuring the delivery of quality programs and enforcement of civil rights.

## NRCS Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Resources

All NRCS state and field offices must have certain civil rights and EEO information prominently displayed in a location that is clearly visible to program participants or persons seeking NRCS assistance.
No: 115.1

DATE: August 31, 196k

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

ORDER

SWAM Organization and Functions of the Office of Missile

and Satellite Systems

There is hereby established the Office of Missile and

Satellite Systems in the Office of the Secretary of the

Air Force.

The Director of the Office of Missile and Satellite

Systems is primarily responsible for assisting the

Secretary in discharging his responsibility for the

direction, supervision and control of the SAMOS Project.

He is responsible for maintaining liaison with the Office,

Secretary of Defense and other interested Governmental

agencies on matters relative to his assigned responsibilities. He may be assigned additional duties as

deemed appropriate by the Secretary of the Air Force.

3. The Director will provide the Secretariat for the Air

Force Ballistic Missile Committee.

DUDLEY C. SHARP

Secretary of the Air Force
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Cross Wind Trap Strips, Herbaceous Wind Barriers, Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management, No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till, Residue Management, Seasonal, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.