alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0

Cetober 5, 1%4

rid.. 'as:A....M...4 VP10E

: r9L",)

.

• .

2::y notes on our neetingo of 1 Septether and 10 Sopteml)or

Cove: several points •bearing on CCRQUA contracting, ao outli:,:te

beim... I have no CIA memlorende relating to these meetings.

Ssntember

It was egreed that the converoation of 11 August roferrod

only to the uaa of aerospace as =PM contractor on CC:13..30A,

ov.:y to . the contractual changes related thereto.

::c.Zone made a lone cultersat of his pcsition zIlat the

:ma was not properly organiend, citing, his memorenoo on

cLic oul,:,ect to E±. McGeorge Lundy and is Neiamert. He

maInteenco tnat it is wrong to permit one agency to 1..7euence

the lilt.::....--=enagement of another and that therefore t"...e-M--;:t0

should s3c,ly ttsk the C •., not run itc . internal affairs. Re

tl:ot no further cLenge be intro.Svend into the contract otruccure until this nol.;or izona is settled; (Something

of a noL-oeuitur, in my via:.: )

Az I remmber it, you cl-:o%e .mv.teiately upon his conclusion,

tz.ying ".',11 richt, John, we thin% it ic wrong,.but if you want

that way uo cell run it thLt :7a,." I supported thic latter

atttement, howexer recountinz ..11 the good management reaoons

vhy it woo vroug to operate in thes uny. I closed with a plc:.

•%at et leaot the CIA contrac•= bt administered by a coatractinz

officer on Genaral Greer's 1•,:c.lone agreed.

At t%e clbOe of the eleeting, 7. asked again whether we •

could have t'oe CIA ccntrecte administered from the test Coast,

under'Genaral Greer.* Zr. :IcCone again agreed and said we "could

:Lave ell ti:e people •tr7e needed - enzir.eers too."

•

rr

c.
• it was tacitly my vicw that dia. CIA coatracts undo=

disct:ssion were those with Lastman, Fairchild, cnd C<Incral•

Electric, as well ce the Localleed. coatract fir fatrication,of

the payload c=partment. hava tri:d - allmys - and 1 beliov4

1 did so on 11 ;msu:it - to :was. a pacaaco out oi (±) installinc;

Larosi.-ace as S2/TD, (ii) establIsh • ng a LISC sv.z .tor:p inte.Trr.pea .

contract with General. Grcor,.(iii) .addins clauses to all other

contracts to reflect (i).

1C r 1. •

C t. r

••••nn•n••••--.-

, •

l. 'eCona said that La ha6 decided to as nou CIA

ran, Crowley, to Grcer's staff to ba respcnsi;do all CIA

activities on CMOM: costractiv::, security, c.ne. tectnical.

Re would bLive contractins anel secnrity. peaL:le him.

Crowley was identified as aa en,3iaear forL.erly

•

cur ,•i J. 1,FoCcne dii7ected Genatrai Cart ,:r to

sc:;14 TaL: a r.;.:=o2aad=m to this cll.:est. It was agreed ti:at.t .

fo= technical aCvisory comvitte3 to Grcor,

ri_?-:ctsuntation, repl acinil; the defunct C.

*.:ou then directed to rc;;;;:c.rt back ot.

-(- =}- actions -

t-u a to .:::.cor.zzodate. to this now P.rran3meat. 20 ):ar, I have

no ac

cz-za. Its CZA. correc::vadence oi ac:ions on tha ratter, aad.corres

pc

•

.aUn;;-,ly 1=ve ta:.:es. tion r-.7c31Z.

rrcer-rIcn6stion

. .•

This is also a plea: let T.► ;; r_In agree to foal L'p this

in-.7ossiLle . mass any further by h.:.vin2.; S2Pri) under Crear and

Loca:wc,:d systems-intesration uneer CIA.

/5/

r"

L,

Brockway 1q6Ullaa
TOPSEGRET

...NSW Via

SVIITIMIll JIMMY

-MI-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF 7 APR 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON IMAGERY

REQUIREMENTS AND EXPLOITATION

CHAIRMAN, SIGINT COMMITTEE

SUBJECT: SALT Collection Requirements

REFERENCES: a. USIB -D-46. 4/48, 20 July 1971

USIB-D-46.4/38, 15 July 1970

USIB-D-46.5/6, 3 November 1970

Memo for Holders of USIB-D-46.4/38,

15 July 1970

COMIREX-D-14.12/23, 7 April 1972

f. USIB-SC -10. 9/113, 12 July 1971

The Deputy Secretary of Defense has asked the NRO to review its

operations for support of a possible SALT agreement. The extensive

guidance furnished by USIB in the above references has given a clear

statement of general need for SALT monitoring and detailed mission

guidance has been provided for particular missions.

While these statements of standing and current requirements appear quite comprehensive, it would be most helpful if your committees

could review their adequacy in identifying SALT baseline needs specifically directed to the period from the present through the completion of

the President's Moscow talks in May. Our capabilities during this

period have been previously furnished in status reports for on-orbit

vehicles as well as the anticipated launch schedule for additional

collection platforms.

A response by 19 April 1972 is desired.

CHARLES L. MURPHY

Deputy Director for

Satellite Operations

Noma Vt•

svirremill JOINTLY

--TOP-SEGREF--

811“.11.11 Mr &Meant egsaa00111

OM esotarsa SIN III MPH Pit ..Kt
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 7, 2004



/s/RICHARD J.
MARTINRichard J. Martin Executive Vice President, Finance andAdministration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
'''"

M-7116`7'

ik'X

it el
#### Vaudreuil Lumber Company, Respondent, vs. Ætna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellant.

*April 1*

April *29, 1930.*

*519For the appellant there was a brief by *Linderman, Rams-dell & King*of Eau Claire, and oral argument by *Bailey Ramsdell.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *W. H. Stafford*and *Harold E. Stafford,*both of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by *Harold E. Stafford.*

Stevens, J.

The single question presented is whether the use of force upon the inner doors is an “entry into such . . . vault , , , effected, by force and violence by the use *520of tools . . . directly upon the exterior” of the vault within the meaning of this provision of the policy.

The policy in question is not one prescribed by statute, but one drafted by the defendant company. As to such a policy, “it is a familiar rule that in case of doubt or .ambiguity the language of an insurance policy should be construed most strongly against the insurer.” *Reeves v. Midland Cas. Co.*170 Wis. 370, 373, 174 N. W. 475. “When the policy is capable of two meanings, that which is most favorable to the insured is always to be adopted.” *Patterson v. Natural Premium Mut. L. Ins. Co.*100 Wis. 118, 125, 75 N. W. 980.

The most that can be said is that there may be doubt or ambiguity as to what is meant by the “exterior” of the vault, as that term is used in this policy. The policy must be construed in the light of its purpose to protect the plaintiff from the felonious loss of its property contained in the interior of the vault where entry is effected by force or violence. Accepting the meaning most favorable to the insured, and the meaning that effects the purpose sought to be accomplished when the policy was issued, it must be held that the force and violence applied to the inner doors was applied to the “exterior” of the vault, within the meaning of that term as used in the policy.

These inner doors were clearly exterior to that portion of the vault which was to be protected by the insurance policy. “Until the inner doors were opened no access could be had to its contents, and no entry made into the safe proper.” *Bruner Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.*101 Neb. 825, 166 N. W. 242, 243. It was the apparent purpose of the policy to protect this interior from burglarious entry effected by force and violence used upon any portion of the vault that must be forced before the interior could be entered. Had it been the purpose of the company to limit its liability to cases where force and violence was applied to the outer doors of *521the vault, it could have made that meaning perfectly clear by the use of a few apt words. But it did not do so. Instead it issued a policy that is clearly capable of a construction that renders it liable in this case.

The cases relied upon by the appellant are those where force was applied to the contents of the vault after entry into its interior was secured by means other than the use of force or violence.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

Fritz, J., dissents.
# C_2005045EN.01002801.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/28

---

(2005/C 45/61)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

Past publications

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

OJ C 262, 23.10.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy L. Krist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Timothy L. Krist


Timothy L. Krist


Chief Financial Officer


March 29, 2010





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John T. Raymond,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2003.

                                                     /s/ John T. Raymond
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John T. Raymond
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

°WWI OF THC UNOWI INWRILTANY

March 3, 1964

Dear Mr. McCone:

and 28 J 9-64) I have s

In come of 12 December 78-63)

the need

to assign a it operations officer to the

Mt0 Staff. In the abs • ow you,

I have selected Lt. Colone l USAF, to

fill this post. Lt. Colon* y qualified

aeronautical engineer and air opera ons officer. His

experience includes a previous tour of duty with CIA.

Re is scheduled to report for duty within the next sixty

days.

I urge your consineration of nominees for the other

posts identified in the memorandm of 12 December.

Sincerely,

Biome

Brockway McMillan

Director

-OW National Reconnaissance Office

Honorable John A. &Cone

Director

Central Inteiligence Agency /2

-

1**,4111

-_--1 ' Ilan 3 •

r , ,!) DIP- 5E06.1iJ DOES El.? L.'

3:1ge

5?41:4r

•

••••

• •.•"144
.

6494 T.IF TOR COL /40ORE;SEMCLN

SAL TOR i*Prid t.441y, W. .1.44 ► gsw sExttaLat

65:44 smitdexii DAC/VATS FOR, ma.

FeNDPRG AFB CALIF i,COURIZR/ ZEN
CH-sES.

ERENCROET41114gD
':* :
\•-,,,•• " - •

+!:

P6: is, .,

:

•

‘•

" • RROPARLY .0

!' . • • • —• • • , •

v,p. l000pewsmer plusrriteei isprpc:it.:,.* •
:-7 .13Y;'.THP • NV•
:• , • ' ' .•

..G.Ax;i .... .

4... FF ii,::.....":, ..;;••.,•• ••••1, • , !:....4.,,... 3...z... .

. .

A.

W3 HZ

,,,. .:: .W3t1 4

''''. :‘ .i :: . •':••

'"' • ;:e 7.: ..°•••,...'.;"i:::t...1.3::: ...''..,' e:, .. " •'•, $454/4

:.:;, '''. .: IV; %:`,..4k: - : • 4.,..s. _1. : i.

,.. 2,.......),:x.:,,.. ::-/i.::. :: .-:•; ,,, ...:: ...; ... ,...i., ..... .: 1 . ,. .., ,

t. • '• .10...,....r. t:

.

• ..,,,' .'t.

't• ' • ., .,

.. WS. ' •

49)14 ' n'''',.,...,.. i; '5 1.',.; , . v" ": '': • • r .• ... ..;.

2:1*r'ft.

t ; ie ..

:Apzikuk. mxixamtRy SIGNAL - *- • - '

OOPS, „ pOOD- : . or 7 ekS.!'::,

U. *".":::TAZ •

1.1,4' t .'", " ',.:. ' "'V: '

2%; • . ' XT-losmtter, .,

.,-,:,::: ...2 ....,.. • . : -

.,,...: ..f;. :;:'-11 -. ''::::i •;•.';•r':':,e;:-

SX$A1,. RDi4:T* Z. T+.566 SECONDS. .:.x:,

:. • P.,.,:...,,, ,: .. ...,

'' :-'.*: • : :,... .. -; *

- : ''''" ;`• .. •

:•• A •-i*"....1(04:PRT. orRACKPIO.. - , -.,r;:'! * ?

. : '

. 1

... 1. , ;:

!'.'' - .: . • '

...'Ug4,0116 . APPARENTLY BECAUSrOF r*,.... . .

:•,ii. i'.;.•::;.+•;••:::! t,;.. •; 41'. ''' ••• '•' 1•4- • • :•:-,.:, .'::'. 6: : -' • .0 , ! ' •••'••••:*: .• ', t:,-- . .. _: ...i.T.;... •.!, . . J. AF:, . _.leW'..4.. nf' • _:-. ' -.'i .. ,'":7 : • ...:: .:,...:: ..`..:. * -7' ...,, ' ;'• '' /- ., , 1 - •

!'.. f - : 44 OISDIXifit ;'n1111 ' 14:NrirlaSSIONliAliES. allifssoOkritrao 1

:. „ ,... ..,,,,..::.„...;„_, Eft::::::.• ;. i- ......:......:., .'. Cf.:;' . • •:: '''-r. ‘..: • '....

. .4'f. . ' b '

... . . ' .

;'''.' .. i.. ..- .',' 1 Ui 7t.'s .: '.,s, . •,,... .•.....' '...... . 1 .:.;:•''':. ..: ... C ;: :.'.: ''-....7. .. t:7. ..: „ : ."i 4'.' 1,:: • =.. .. : . ..

i. ''.... , • ARTEP:::

. Amfrkuorat). :60 • j• flAL:INJECT 

,.:., .,-.4,-:;...,.:?.., NT •';• '•4:',...: le • *t4. ..-- •• :+lt • 44 .1. ., ',. : .:

.• :re.'

n

;.:1:0:421A.f

Or Fla* T ES -

. • ,•••• . • ..

xitankctriauNk : • 1. 7•'; /.!*-Z •• •r;•:•••

•**: .

-Alt* .;.• .):.. . f • 

... . . 440349k.arrEs•

••" • , . . . .

F.,

TItATIV VCR ..•

• .t • s

s • .

•

.r. . . • . .

r t • •10:-• ...-•••• • •

Iz ilt11424E-

•.

••••!:::•.4. • :••: n ';4*.•

: 13E41:1 LV‘CK:

001tE•••-i'="

:4.

!•••:.2:

aiiN

T‘' i•••••i H;THE'DIOITALvirRA,CISING

•••

LA1111,_ .

-To. •

. •

• -
"i'••;0d14. • •
#### In the Matter of Leopold Siao-Pao, Appellant, v Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 511]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered October 3, 2002, which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to annul a determination of the New York State Division of Parole which denied him parole release, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The appeal is moot because petitioner appeared before the Parole Board in 2003 and received another hearing, the only relief that petitioner could have received in the event that this Court found merit in his current appeal concerning his denial of parole in 2001 *(see Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole,*83 NY2d 788 [1994]; *Matter of Patterson v New York State Div. of Parole,*298 AD2d 254 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 501 [2003]). In any event, we find that the Board properly considered the factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 12, 2006



/s/    RICHARD J. MARTINRichard J. Martin Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Annual Report of Consortium Service
Management  Group,  Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ended
December  31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Gordon W. Allison, Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/  Gordon  W.  Allison
Dated:  April  14,  2004      --------------------------------------------------
                              Gordon  W.  Allison
                              Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.














                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
l '1' _ HAI--lDLt:: VIA 

c'Y-:l\.~ ~N TALI' - '(E,Approved for Release:, 2018/0~1 C05101927 

o t. .I-d • , -j ... ""....... ·'-bY"" ~.:-. , ~ON..TROJ.:: SYST;;;MSJOINil..,Y. J i

d t>C.Cl~?1: T 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14000973000 

r In.>' 7 ..<;; G,~-c.,,. .. ': I i.,.-LC !{,..-,.,". i (/ 

THE NRO/DIA/NPIC D.~TERFACE 

I. GENERAL 

A. How well/badly is the present interface working? 

1. Specific customer problems 

2. Customer suggested solutions to problems 

II. SPECIFIC 

1. Camera Manuals 

(a) How useful,as written? 

(b) How widely used? How many people have signed the 

access sheet? How are the dates of those signatures 

distributed? Biased back toward publication date? 

Or are many fairly recent? 

(c) Do the manuals contain enough/too much/ too little 

information? 

(d) What would be different for the customer-J-!., if KH-9 

were TKH with a BYEMAN annex? How m~ people 

would need access to the BYEMAN annex? How many 

new BYEMAN clearances would be required? 

2. Operational Messages 

" 

(a) How does the customer handle SOC BYEMAN messages?' 

(b) Do the people who handle these messages have clearances 

just to do this job or would they have clearances anyway? 

(c) How many people are involved? 

(d) Are the present arrangements re 'these messages satisfactory? If not. what change is suggested? 

3. Planning 

(a) How does the customer do his resources planning for the 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL:. SYSTEMS JOINTL.Y 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101927 

I 

I 

i 

i . ~ 

1 

-
future (personnel, facilities, equipment)? 

(b) How many people are involved directly in this planning? 

How m~ need BYEMAN clearances? How many -of these 

would have BYEMAN -clearances anyway? 

(c) Does the customer believe he is getting enough. or the 

correct. in:foX'XX'l.<:l.tion to do :future resources planning? 

What changes are suggested? 

HANDLE vrA' 

BYEMAN-TALENr-KEYHOLE 

/ 

___________ C::.o~N.:.T..:..;R..:::O:..:L:....:::S.:.Y..:::S.:.T:..:E;.:.:.M:.;,S;;...;:J..:::G.:.I N:..;.'.;...~'::: ~' y:-___ ~~_____________________________ _ ____________ .. _-_ 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101927 

-I