alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DMITRY KRUGLOV , ) ) Plaintiff , ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23

- 2305 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP ) AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, ) ) Defendant

. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on P laintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court GRANTS the application, and for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the case without prejudice. Kruglov’s first theory in this complaint fails because he has no cause of action. Plaintiff alleges he submitted to defendant an Application for Travel Document along with an application fee, a request to expedite the application, and a request to waive the biometrics fee. See Compl. at
1 ; Pl. Aff. (ECF No. 1

- 1) at 1

. He states defendant advised that it “already has his biometric data, so Plaintiff doesn’t have to go to biometric appointment, but if biometric fee was already paid, it will not be refunded.” Pl. Aff. at 1. By refusing to process his application without a biometric fee notwithstanding his waiver request, and by demanding a biometric fee when defe ndant already had his biometric data, plaintiff alleges, defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. See Compl. at 2. Because there is no private right of action under the cited criminal statute, Plaintiff’s First
Cause o f Action must be dismissed. See Short v. Hook Sun Eu , No. 1:20

- cv - 02425, 2020 WL2 5946070, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2020 ); Rodriguez v. Shulman , 844 F. Supp. 2d 1, 13 (D.D.C. 2012), ; Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc. , 853 F. Supp. 458, 466 (D.D.C. 1994). Plaint iff’s second and third theories are far too vague. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff’s complaint does not meet that standard, because it, among other things, fails to explain what “policies, pr actices, and customs” or failures in supervision lead to his alleged mistreatment. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: March 17, 2024 CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             302
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2436
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     111894
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            2976
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              2966
<LOANS>                                         141077
<ALLOWANCE>                                        576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  263246
<DEPOSITS>                                      143097
<SHORT-TERM>                                     38070
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6922
<LONG-TERM>                                      16522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                       58635
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  263246
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7959
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3845
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   280
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 12084
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5299
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6841
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5242
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       55
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 612
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3509
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3509
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        591
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    932
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   590
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       69
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  576
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            576
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR           
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              32,790
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      183,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         28,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   265,597
<PP&E>                                           4,588,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,798,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,339,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              422,524
<BONDS>                                          1,944,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                            16,639
<OTHER-SE>                                         881,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,339,030
<SALES>                                            105,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   105,694
<CGS>                                               45,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      136,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (96,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (15,438)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (81,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (81,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.79)
        


</TABLE>
• ••.... •

THE2) "R CRE111- 43 F 13CENTRAL. INTELUGENCE

WASHINGTON

•

•

Tha Ilmorablo Roswell L. Glipalris

Deputy lecretary al Defense

Washington. D. C.

Dear Rom •

This refers to your proposed joint asesamandasa on "Zstablielsnum of MAP Iteview Caminittee, " which lormaliaes the agreement

we reached in ems westing on 23 October to establish procedures for

monitoring dr National Reeennaissance Program.

As yon knew, I hays previously iodinated Dr. Wheel's to act

as my monitor under the tense el the basic Agreement. and I also

look to General Carts, tar measiasal assistance in this rowed. Carter

and Wheaten met with rabini and McMillan on 3 Decembor at rabbit'

seggestion. I am informed that Dr. Mani proposed that dots group

meet biwesidy, alteroadng the allies meeting planet that Ow daimon

as suck would likewiso alternate far sack mooting and IN reopensible

for keeping soak minutes as might be respired as well as druishing

the coffee. I understand this informal worlds. arrangement was agreed

by all and that they will meet apse the third week in December.

Vince the mooting. already seam so be well started, I suggest

that we premed in accordance with raldni's proposal. I would here

also that you and I could meet poriodically. perhaps muddy, to

'mein* states reports and ressonnendatlaas from this menitering

gm"-

dincerdy.

John A. McCune

r1111119Arv-63

December 1963
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(File Nos. 333-90384 and 333-119180) of Community Central Bank Corporation on
Form S-8 of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated
March 7, 2007, on the consolidated financial statements incorporated by
reference in Community Central Bank Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006.


/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
-------------------------------------
Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 26, 2007


                                       21
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Profile Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2009 (the "Report"), I,
Henry E. Gemino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

(1) The Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on
the dates and for the periods presented therein.

                                                PROFILE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: September 28, 2009                        By: /s/ Henry E. Gemino
                                                    -------------------
                                                    Henry E. Gemino
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2005106EN.01004002.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/40

---

Action brought on 18 February 2005 by Athinaiki Techniki SA against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-94/05)

(2005/C 106/80)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 February 2005 by Athinaiki Techniki SA, Neo Iraklio, Athens (Greece), represented by Spyros A. Pappas, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision of the Directorate General for Competition to take no further action on the applicant's complaint relating to State aid granted by the Hellenic Republic to the Hyatt Regency consortium in connection with the Casino Mont Parnes public contract, which the applicant learnt of by letter dated 2 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision of the Directorate General for Competition to take no further action on the applicant's complaint relating to State aid granted by the Hellenic Republic to the Hyatt Regency consortium in connection with the Casino Mont Parnes public contract, which the applicant learnt of by letter dated 2 December 2004;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its application the applicant relies first on an alleged infringement by the Commission of the obligation to initiate the formal examination procedure provided for by Article 88(2) EC and Article 4(4) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.

Second, the applicant complains that the Commission made several errors in the statement of reasons for the contested decision. In this connection, the applicant submits that the Commission states no reasoning to demonstrate that there were no serious difficulties of assessment, still less to explain why it disregarded certain key documents. Moreover, the contested decision is based solely on the analysis of the Directorate General for the Internal Market, although this was confined to finding that it was not possible to apply the Community legislation in this case. Finally, the applicant considers that the statement of reasons for the decision, namely the decision not to regard the measures concerned as State aid, is also inadequate, and submits, on the same basis, that there was an infringement of Article 87(1) EC.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K, and to all references to our firm, into
the Company's previously filed registration statements as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          File Number          File Description
          -----------          ----------------
<S>                            <C>
           333-57813           Form S-3 regarding the Company's offering of 
                               6 1/2% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock

           333-71191           Form S-8 regarding the Company's Savings and 
                               Retirement Plan

           333-57393           Form S-8 regarding the Company's Employee 
                               Stock Purchase Plan

           333-51987           Form S-8 regarding the Company's Stock 
                               Option Plan
</TABLE>

Seattle, Washington
March 26, 1999
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111408 

TOP-SEGR.El_ T_ ,ENT KEYHOLE / 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PACKARD 

SUBJECT: TAGBOARD Mission 

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have submitted a request to members 

of the 303 Committee for approval of a TAGBOARD drone mission 

over South China and alternatively over North Korea. This proposal 

for overflight is in response to my request to conduct final system 

developmental test missions in an operational environment. 

A TAGBOARD mission flown in favorable weather conditions 

could acquire numerous high priority USIB, South China, and North 

Korea high-resolution photographic requirements. Satisfaction of 

these requirements by National Reconnaissance Program satellites 

has been drastically impaired by unfavorable weather conditions. 

The National Reconnaissance Program SIGINT satellites will 

be directed to record ELINT data emanating from foreign electronic 

stimulation resulting from the TAGBOARD flight. 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 5 

The TAGBOARD mission will be discussed a-c the 303 Committee 

Meeting on 23 Septemb-.. ..:_· ~ 969. Recommend you indorse this proposal. 

John L. McLucas 

Attachment 

Memo, TAGBOARD Operational 

Missions, 5 Sept 69, BYE-78308 

TAGBOARD HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN /TALENT KEYHOLE TOP SECRET CONTROL SYSTEM 5 EXCLUDf.D FROM AUTOMATIC Rf.GRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOr APPLV 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111408 

coNrnoc NoB....YE-13194-69 COPY ___ o, ___ ,.~J;l(f', 

PAGt. __ l __ OF __ l __ PA(j[ ',
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CHRISTINE V. SALES, Respondent

v. STEPHEN R. SALES, SR., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 565 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 25th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
6. This First Amendment shall not be of any legal effect or consequence unless signed byLandlord and Tenant, and once signed by Landlord and Tenant it shall be binding upon andinure to the benefit of Landlord, Tenant and their respective legal representatives,successors and assigns. 7. This First Amendment has been executed and shall be construed under the laws of theState of Georgia.In witness whereof, the undersigned have caused this First Amendment to be executed under seal anddelivered as of the day and year first above written.           Signed, sealed and delivered asto **LANDLORD**in the presence of:   **ISC PROPERTIES, LLC**                   By: /s/ J. Leland Strange           J. Leland Strange  /s/ Rebecca Cox                 Notary Public                   Signed, sealed and delivered asto **TENANT**in the presence of   **INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION**                   By: /s/ Bonnie L. Herron   Witness: /s/ Marcy Powers      Bonnie L. Herron, CFO
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors of
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on the Effectiveness of the Internal Control Structure
Relative to the Servicing of Home Loan Receivables, that Chevy Chase
Bank, F.S.B. (the "Bank") maintained an effective internal control structure
over financial reporting relative to the servicing of home loan receivables
owned by Chevy Chase Home Loan Trust Series 1996-1 and 1997-1
(collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 2001.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure over
financial reporting, testing, and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of the internal control structure, and such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors
or irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control structure over financial reporting to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control structure
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained an
effective internal control structure over financial reporting relative to
the servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Bank's home loan Trusts
as of September 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
upon criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of
directors and management of the Bank, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.,
U.S. Bank National Association and MBIA Insurance Corporation, and
should not be used for any other purpose.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Vienna, VA
October 17, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FOR THE
FISCAL PERIOD TO DATE FOUND ON PAGES 3-6 INCLUSIVE OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q 
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          78,925
<SECURITIES>                                     3,968
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,028
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,596
<PP&E>                                         142,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,283
<SALES>                                        114,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,383
<CGS>                                           73,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,781
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,147)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>