alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005011EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 January 2005

(2005/C 11/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3091 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4398 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7006 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0483 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5491 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,17 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,175 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5818 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,365 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4324 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0626 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 37 792 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,58 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7708 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7242 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5859 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2051 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,873 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1444 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 366,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9051 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3091

JPY

Japanese yen

134,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4398

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7006

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0483

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5491

ISK

Iceland króna

82,17

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,175

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5818

CZK

Czech koruna

30,365

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4324

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0626

ROL

Romanian leu

37 792

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,58

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7708

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7242

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5859

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2051

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,873

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1444

KRW

South Korean won

1 366,05

ZAR

South African rand

7,9051

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the 2015 March of Dimes Silver Dollar as follows: Coin
Introductory price
Regular priceSilver Proof
$46.95
$51.95Silver Uncirculated
43.95
48.95
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Lhotsky, Acting Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500. Authority:
                        31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701. Dated: February 6, 2015. Richard A. Peterson, Deputy Director for Manufacturing and Quality, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. 2015-02882 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
i I 

, 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C051 08049 

. 10f 3tt;l(t I 

~ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

·-V""~"·' 'I 

HANDLE V,r"'H;t .... 

. BYEMAN' 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

THE NRO STAFF March 6, 1968 

HANDLE vr ... 

MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR PAUL JONES 

SUBJECT: The NRO Switching Center 

This refers to your memorandum of March 1, 1968, same 

subject. 

Your memorandum informs me that UNIVAC has independently 

produced a primary computer and processor of a type which we 

, hope to purchase in the future. I have your assurance that this 

action by UNIVAC has indeed been independent, i. e. without any 

encouragement from your office. 

Confirming my conversations, you and your people are positively prohibited from acquiring, openly or covertly, any item of 

UNIVAC equipment falling within the scope of the waiver request, 

which is now in Dr . Flax's hands. This is an unequivocal order 

not subject to interpretation. 

Q~~.~~ PAUL E. WORTHMAN 

Colonel, USAF 

Deputy Director for 

Plans & Policy 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET CONTROL NO'-,.,-_____ _ 

COPV ___ OF, ___ CO_'ES 

CONTROl.. SYSTEM EXClUD EO ~ROM AUTOM A. TIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLV 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C051 08049 

PAGE. ___ OF ___ PAGES
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy N. McCullough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Randy N. McCullough


Randy N. McCullough


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 29, 2010





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 123

       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2015

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Flake, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rounds, and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To prevent a taxpayer bailout of health insurance issuers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Obamacare Taxpayer Bailout 
Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF BAILOUT OF HEALTH INSURANCE ISSUERS.

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by 
striking section 1342 (42 U.S.C. 18062).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005093EN.01002802.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/28

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 31 January 2005

in Case T-447/04 R Capgemini Nederland BV v Commission of the European Communities

(Public contracts for services - Community tendering procedure - Interim proceedings - Prima facie case - Urgency)

(2005/C 93/57)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-447/04 R: Capgemini Nederland BV, established in Utrecht (Netherlands), represented by M. Meulenbelt and H. Speyart, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: L. Parpala, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for suspension of operation, first, of the Commission's decision to reject the bid submitted by the applicant in response to a call for tenders (JAI-C3-2003-01) for the development and installation of a second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) and for the possible development and installation of a Visa Information System (VIS) in the field of justice and home affairs and of its decision to award the contract to another bidder and, secondly, of the Commission's decision to conclude a contract relating to the SIS II and VIS systems with another bidder — the President of the Court of First Instance has made an order on 31 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76952-76953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31616]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a service to the Procurement 
List that will be provided by a nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must Be Received On or Before: 1/9/2012.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 USC

[[Page 76953]]

8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

Addition

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
provide the service listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. If approved, the action will not result in any additional 
reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small 
entities other than the small organization that will provide the 
service to the Government.
    2. If approved, the action will result in authorizing small 
entities to provide the service to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
Chapter 85) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Comments on this certification are invited. Commenters should 
identify the statement(s) underlying the certification on which they 
are providing additional information.

End of Certification

    The following service is proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for provision by the nonprofit agency listed:

Service

Service Type/Location: Furnishings Management, McConnell Air Force 
Base, KS.
NPA: Training, Rehabilitation & Development Institute, San Antonio, 
TX.
Contracting Activity: 22d Contracting Squadron, McConnell Air Force 
Base, KS.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-31616 Filed 12-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambridge 
IsotoPE LAB

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.33(a) on or before April 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for 
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: 
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion 
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on August 
12, 2014, Cambridge Isotope Lab, 50 Frontage Road, Andover, 
Massachusetts 01810 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 
morphine (9300), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
schedule II.
    The company plans to utilize small quantities of the listed 
controlled substance in the preparation of analytical standards.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-02820 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
• 

G E Power & Water 

Water &Process Technologies 

James Horwood 

Industrial Sales Manager - ABMet 

North Americq . 

3239 Dundos Street West 

Deborah Bartram Ookville ON L6M 4B2

Canodo VP. Water Programs 

T 905 465 3030 14555 Avion Parkway. Suite 200 

jomes.horwood@ge.com Chantilly. VA 20151 

6 May. 2011 

Dear Ms. Bartram: 

Note that any information contained within this letter that is marked with a ..§ is considered to 

be Confidential Business Information. -~ 

Further to our call of 19 April 2011. GE has estimated sludge and solids yields for the ABMet systems 

proposed in our 11 March 2011 letter to you. The information below is a modeled estimate and may 

not reflect actual volumes in operating conditions. The modeling is based on the feed water criteria 

utilized for the estimates provided on 19 April. 

For this estimate. it is assumed that the entire system will be backwashed once per month with a 

recommended operating protocol that dictates that the backwashing of the system is spread out over 

that month to ease handling and minimize instantaneous volumes. For example. a system with 4 

reactor trains (8 reactors totall would backwash 2 reactors per week. 

Estimated backwash water volumes: 

Volume per Volume per Flow Rate Number of Number of backwash per backwash total Trains Reactors reactor 

tgpmJ tusgalJ 

50 2 4 

100 2 4 

150 3 6 

200 4 8 

300 3 6 

400 4 8 

600 6 12 

800 8 16 

1.000 10 20 
ABMet solids are generally co-Iandfilled with upstream clarifier solids. Given that they would amount 

to a minute fraction of the clarifier solids. the ABMet solids do not change the classification of the 

overall product. The ABMet solids can also be dewatered and handled separate and pass the TCLP 

test. 

Best Regards. 

James Harwood 

Industrial Sales Manager ABMet
OFFICE OF THE UNOER SECRETARY 

.JEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Discussion with Secretary Packard, 30 December 69 

Classified Subjects: 

I described the "H" review which we had conducted with 

BOB and how I felt this had served a good purpose in getting 

them off our backs. He thought that the thing had been well 

handled. 

On the Fubini Panel, he felt that it would be very 

satisfactory for them to slip their report to February or 

March. I told him that·I would be willing for them to do 

that and in fact, I would be very happy if they slipped it 

to April or May but that I wasn't sure that some other members 

of ExCom might not insist on getting a report out sooner. 

Specifically, they might ask us to call an ExCorn meeting at 

which time we could explore what progress had been made, which 

could lead to an early decision on whether to speed up the 

read-out system. He says he does not think there would be 

any pressure from the other ExCom members and that we should 

go ahead and do the job the way we think is best. 

With respect to the combining of the CIA and SAC U-2 

fleets, he said that Dick Helms had made a pitch to the President 

to keep the CIA fleet and was successful. However Packard said 

that as far as he is concerned it is a continuing issue and that 

we should go ahead and prepare our study of how to conduct the 

combination because he thinks it is very likely to .,appen in 

the not t00 distant future. 

John L. McLucas 

BANDLE VIA B 

CONTROL mn TOP SECRET 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115115 

"f/;?.-30-()/t? / 

&yd I ! 

/Sy.G- /,,1, S Z2-?l)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                AMENDMENT TO THE INRANGE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                    EXECUTIVE EVA INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

          Pursuant to Paragraph 14 of Section V of the Inrange Technologies
Corporation Executive EVA Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), Inrange
Technologies Corporation hereby amends the Plan in the following manner:

          1.   Effective May 1, 2001, Paragraph 6 of Section V is amended by the
addition of the following at the end thereof:

     "In order to receive any amounts provided under this Paragraph 6, a
     participant must execute a valid release and any other documents the
     Company may require. The Company may, in its sole discretion, waive the
     application of the preceding sentence with respect to all or any portion of
     any amount and with respect to any participant."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment was executed by the undersigned as
of the date shown below.

                                                INRANGE TECHNOLOGIES
                                                CORPORATION


Date: May 1, 2001                               /s/  Kenneth H. Koch
                                                -----------------------------

                                                By:   Kenneth H. Koch
                                                   --------------------------

                                                Its:  Vice President
                                                     ------------------------
# C_2005115EN.01002202.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/22

---

Action brought on 19 January 2005 by Claire Staelen against European Parliament

(Case T-32/05)

(2005/C 115/43)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 19 January 2005 by Claire Staelen, residing in Bridel (Luxembourg), represented by Joëlle Choucroun, lawyer, having an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the decision of the selection board of 18 August 2004 in Competition EUR/A/151/98; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the decision of the selection board of 18 August 2004 in Competition EUR/A/151/98;

| 2. | order the European Parliament to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 30 000 in respect of compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered, increased by the statutory interest in force in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg from the date of the judgment to be delivered until full and final settlement, the substantive damage being reserved; |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the European Parliament to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 30 000 in respect of compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered, increased by the statutory interest in force in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg from the date of the judgment to be delivered until full and final settlement, the substantive damage being reserved;

| 3. | order the European Parliament to pay all of the costs incurred in the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the European Parliament to pay all of the costs incurred in the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant had brought an action against the decision of the selection board in Competition EUR/151/98. By judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance on 5 March 2003 in Case T-24/01, that decision was set aside. Following that annulment, the Parliament reopened the competition and the selection board resumed its deliberations. By the decision contested in the present case, the selection board for the competition decided not to place the applicant on the list of successful candidates.

In support of her action, the applicant alleges a breach of Article 233 EC, maintenance of discriminatory treatment and infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

---