alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7445-7446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC15-64-000.
    Applicants: Energy Capital Partners II, LLC, Energy Capital 
Partners III, LLC on behalf its Public Utility Subsidiaries.
    Description: Section 203 Application of Energy Capital Partners II, 
LLC, et. al. on behalf of its Public Utility Subsidiaries.
    Filed Date: 1/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150127-5327.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/15.

    Docket Numbers: EC15-65-000.
    Applicants: Longview Power.
    Description: Section 203 Application of Longview Power, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150127-5329.

[[Page 7446]]

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-493-001.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Conesville, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment per 35.17(b): Response to Deficiency 
Letter to be effective 12/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 1/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150126-5220.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-909-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: Request for Waiver of American Electric Power Service 
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 1/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150126-5396.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-917-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas North Company.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): TNC-
Concho Valley EC-Golden Spread EC First Amd & Rest IA to be effective 
12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 1/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150128-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02627 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit32.1**

 

MICROS SYSTEMS,INC.

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, A.L. Giannopoulos,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”),certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                                             | /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Name:   A.L.  Giannopoulos        |
|   | Date:     May  10, 2005 |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.40.10

AMENDMENT NO. 10

TO THE

UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.

SHELTERED SAVINGS PLAN

Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) hereby amends the above-named plan (the Plan), effective as of
August 31, 1997, as follows:

1. Section 3.8(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

(i) The amount of Elective Contributions made in any Plan Year on behalf of all Highly Compensated
Employees shall not result in an Actual Deferral Percentage for such Highly Compensated Employees that exceeds the greater of:

(A) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by 1.25;
or

(B) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year,
multiplied by two, provided that the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Highly Compensated Employees does not exceed the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year by more than two percentage
points.

2. Sections 3.8(a)(iv) and (v) (and any successors to them) of the Plan are hereby deleted.

3. Section 3.9(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

(i) The Actual Contribution Percentage for eligible Participants in any Plan Year who are all Highly
Compensated Employees shall not exceed the greater of:

(A) the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible
Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by 1.25; or

(B)
the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by two, provided that the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible Participants who are Highly
Compensated Employees does not exceed the Actual Contribution Percentage for all Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year by more than two percentage points.



1



---

4. Sections 3.9(a)(ii) and (iii) (and any successors to them) of the Plan are hereby
deleted.

* * * * *

The Company has caused this Amendment No. 10 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.



|                    |  |                       |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Company            
|                    | 
|                    |  | UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
|                    |  |                      
|Dated: May 10, 2010 |  | By:                   |  | /s/    ROBERT M. LING,
JR.                
|                    |  | Its:                  |  | Executive Vice President & General Counsel



2
Cynthia AmbroseAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

June 23, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00788

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

v.

Cynthia AMBROSE

, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR10002 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee has filed a motion to consolidate the clerk’s record in appellate cause number 04

- 13

- 00576

- CR with th e clerk’s record in th is appellate cause number. The motion is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THIS FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                       420
<INVENTORY>                                      2,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,123
<PP&E>                                           8,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,681
<SALES>                                         28,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,049
<CGS>                                           12,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                       515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,719
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
•

•

r.r. •

• LI

DEPARTMENT OF THE MR FORCE

OFFICE OF TIE NKR SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

••

November 13, 1964

!Fr ijç

Cy,

For your information relative

to the Crowley matter.

Brockway McH

Attachment

••• •• • •••• •••••i•:•n 1.• ••••1:70•78. jr•"*.••47,

• • • • n•••n •• ..;

•
VANCE HAS BEEF'

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WAU4INGTON.

errics or ma Uw000 Saaarriort

•

November 13, 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

On November 13th, I telephoned General Carter to attempt

to arrange a meeting between General Carter, General Greer,

Mr. Crowley and myself, and hopefully to set it up for early

next week. Due to General Greer's launch schedule, I

suggested we have General Greer come in here for such a

meeting.

General Carter indicated he would be away for several

days next week. Further advised that he was trying to have

an analysis made of the Vance/McCone correspondence because

although he could see vast areas of agreement, he also saw

places which could become "hookers", and believed it would

be best to have Carter/McMillan negotiations on these areas

prior to setting up such a meeting. The analysis will include

not only those areas where there are no questions, but also

will include those areas on which he believes there should

be a meeting of the minds. Such an analysis, according to

General Carter, will be completed and furnished this office

by early next week. After the analysis has been evaluated,

and proper negotiations between McMillan and Carter take place,

then a meeting can be arranged with Greer and Crowley.

I agreed to the above approach and advised I would await

further word from General Carter.
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

230) ll-K- (I) -43 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 230 of 325 

P.1 
P.2 

aug 

II-K-(I)-43 

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILER 

APPLICATIONS: COAL CLEANING AND LOW SULFUR COAL. 

Versar, Inc. and Teknekron, Inc. 

December 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-43
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1182 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 714
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1182

   To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing 
                              agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2015

   Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Scott, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
 Durbin, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. 
   Gardner) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                            December 7, 2016

                Reported by Mr. Thune, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing 
                              agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF APPLICATION OF JSA ATTRIBUTION RULE FOR 
              EXISTING AGREEMENTS.

    In the case of a party to a joint sales agreement (as defined in 
Note 2(k) to section 73.3555 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) 
that is in effect on the effective date of the amendment to Note 
2(k)(2) to such section made by the Further Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking and Report and Order adopted by the Commission on March 31, 
2014 (FCC 14-28), such party shall not be considered to be in violation 
of the ownership limitations of such section by reason of the 
application of the rule in such Note 2(k)(2) (as so amended) to the 
joint sales agreement.
                                                       Calendar No. 714

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1182

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing 
                              agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 7, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
# C_2005058EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 March 2005

(2005/C 58/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3197 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0365 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5518 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2160 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5825 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,550 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4314 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8758 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 025 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,650 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6642 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6682 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6267 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2934 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7980 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1483 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7538 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3197

JPY

Japanese yen

138,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68960

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0365

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5518

ISK

Iceland króna

79,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2160

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5825

CZK

Czech koruna

29,550

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4314

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8758

ROL

Romanian leu

36 025

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,650

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6642

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6682

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6267

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2934

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7980

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1483

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,90

ZAR

South African rand

7,7538

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Arise Technologies Inc. - Exhibit 10.8






Statement 


This statement is made regarding the loan between the following
parties: 

	 	(1) 	
      Chieh-His Lin (the “Lender”); and

	 	(2) 	
      Arise Technologies Co., Ltd. (the
  “Borrower”).



The content of the loan is as following: 

	 	1. 	
      Loan. The Lender lend the Borrower the sum of USD$61,655
      by the end of June 30, 2008.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      Interest. Both parties have agreed that the loan shall
      not bear interest.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Payment. Payment shall be discussed between both parties
      in accordance with the operation of the company.

	 	 	 
	 	4. 	
      Governing Law. This statement shall be governed by,
      construe and enforced in accordance with the laws of
  Taiwan.



 

 

Signed by the Borrower: Arise Technologies Co., Ltd. 

 

Signed by the Lender: /s/ Chieh-Hsi Lin
=MCMINN/

ADP

$3?

•

•

•

•

BA035 9 IR KOWA OE ROMA WO 113112311

air /C0001

R RUM/

9 14611111.*

.

11722.73 ne 73 creelleret.

101 NOMMOVIZYTOR PR COD

i. memeens masooA norm or Imo TO

WIRY • PLINK WM= TO AFILIS MD OW IIIAT MET NM

Mt PO] ann PUNIC MI= MUM=it AIR

IONE SATELLITE COMMICATIONI • TM AIR FMCS MINUTE COMINICATIONI

ZV UIOOtIMILORMIT, MIL manna it MIIINAL CAW MINTY 11II11 IWO.WAY 1MT COMINICATIMB 70 NOBLE POW 01101 ime me miner

ORINTIMIL 11Z TINWINALS WILL WISTIZ ISOM A MIN CC Vet MONO= OM= TO Min IELIABILITY OF OUNIVIRPTIO CONIORICATIIMB

. . :

iit)P-/ /3 73 /

11110001 BORPIEMBILITY a IIIMICIVIFT.

& TNT MN maw Oa NW COMM OF A WIMP= MIR OF IPICIAILY IMMO IPACICRAPT AO OIRD

NI MIRE COMMICATICIII SATILLIT373 MOM

IT IS A NITIMME BRININS MIN it Cranny . TO IIMILL TAIMPONERIS • OR CONWRIMATIOIN ZVI= • ABM PWACTICALLY ANY mum AIR VCRZ

emu= TINT NW FLA= IN OMIT. 4 MN spennc .AIR FONZ Emu= ACTUALLY /CORPORATE TNT TRANIPOIORR • OR MIK AS neer =CUB rale it CAPABILITY • WILL POT BE Duo.

ittelt VIA

CUM SION
•

OW

CUSINILY DISTIND COINNICMCNI SAM=

PLINTSECE M IX MAE II EP=

CONMECATIONS SYNE SPAM:RIFT Eat.

Cramming

ON INCOUPORADM Dff0

MIL

TM MEN IS SENS NELCPIM SY INS AIR PI CE

NNW CONANI •S UM SPACE NO EN= MIME

• .rfiremm

MI SIM

CONTROL UM

:ea CM OS NM 1891 nu. MASS ONIIN, mactimair. AND memo ar spin sewn% ME AIR YOU ems wows ILICTRONIC MINS unstop aran a mum Dip UMW! Or MOND AM MOM TINUNALS Nt MIND 142 AZI 71•111 ABM TIE MRS= COMM PONT ISM AT SAVIORS UM

LOCATIONS* COMM FIR TES VONE INN EIN

411111110.1111,111WICTINIX.' 0 NM RCA, TOMLIN

N

soo • .111

•

. - •

...

SYSTEE
(S) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR • August 30, 1973

•

--TOP-SECIffMEMORANDUM FOR DR. HALL, ASD(I)

SUBJECT: Management of U-2 Resources

I have coordinated on your memorandum of July 31, 1973

providing for the consolidation of the U-2R fleet in the

Air Force.

Mitt I question the potential ost savi s

and offer the following comments. irst, the

configured aircraft will be needed by the NRO until the summer

of 1975, and thus does not lend itself to use by the Navy

before that time. Also, the Operations cost for the U-2

fleet could conceivably rise if greater utilization is made

of the fleet. The IDEALIST aircraft presently flown from

Taiwan do not accumulate nearly as great a number of operating

hours per year as they are capable of flying. I believe

that it might be better to change the letter proposed for

the Defense Secretary's signature to reftect a savings of

several million dollars rather than a specific amount because

of these uncertainties.

IDEALIST

CLAMP

intallairPia*T ri

PROM

01INIERAL 21:14111111.1 011

ixteurevi 0110111 MU MUMMA CATEC M GOMM MIAOW, OW IMP DST.

a
.;„ fir-sEetar 111111111111, CONTROL $YST& M

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 111.41111FOOMB

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OF E OF THE DIRECTOR 22 August 1974 '

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. MALL, ASD(I)

SUBJECT: Proposed "Omnibus" National Security Council

Intelligence Directive

My staff and I have briefly reviewed the "Proposed

'Omnibus' National Security Council Intelligence. Directive"

(NSCID). I have no objection to promulgating such an NSCID

at this time. There are, however, several portions of the

document that I would like to see modified or at least

expanded.

A specific point of.concern to me is release at the

Secret level.of the fact that an NRO administers activities

in space for the collection . of intelligence data. I strongly

recommend we give this step additional consideration before

taking final action.

As you know, the PFIAB has been studying the organization of the NRO. In addition, my staff has been working on

a draft of a possible NSCID for the NRO. If it is determined

by DCI and SecDef that an Omnibus NSCID is to be issued, we

will provide the details of the NRO section.

ANCLE VIA suigun*D1111111111111timPOOMI

tatamintav CAlfa:

C Sot' No woman Olt w oat

i

It

ii

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE I OF PAGE'S

Dellip--

Cotnisua. 3189-74
• •

4

'11111189-74, 22 August 1974

Subj: Proposed "minibus" NSCID

No etch n••

Distribution 

is

1 Dr. Hall

2 SS-5 STAR.

Working copies

Pilaster

Cook

SS-1

SS-2

PY I
y ,

• •t:' :1•1•1'')

• •••••

:

•

-

.•

•

Ag.•

•

.

.* •

. • '

1.•

•

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM tV

2t

SS- s (1-+ ect0 v I

defek ympared

r3 1s etsa

ttilr, kitiwor. Mr,

ibtmitior depirila r Oft 4c•

ELMER T. BROOKS

Lt Colonel, USAF

I S v5 4 v1 .-1

4.44.4.0 .14.

r e(v g.v• Lc feC

r tico -is 4- j4.ap„". 44.„.

6 L.—.• 3 "is e+•'4 to, • 44

) 0..pe ti APS

A-4 oat soca'

2-1 Ok‘05VS4-

-

s4- t Y..—t. )-4.0

•

it

•

1

..1 •

. •

•
OF THE DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. HALL, ASD(I)

SUBJECT: Proposed "Omnibus" National Securi Council

Intelligence Directive

•

nom

MAL IMMO OF

OADFD apermneassom

SDP DECLASSIFY ON DI OCT.

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE OF PAGES

"(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

•

• '111 ECtEr

OFF

My Staff and I have briefly rev ewed the "Proposed

'Omnibus' National Security Counci Intelligence Directive"

(NSCID). I have no objection to romulgating such an NSCID

at this time. There are, howev , several portions of the

document that I would like to ee modified or at least

expanded.

A specific point of ncern to me is release at the

Secret level of the fact hat an NRO administers activities

in space for the collet on of intelligence data. I strongly

recommend we give thi step additional consideration before

taking final action.

I believe it ould be beneficial for my Staff to work

with yours to de ne alternative sets of wordings for consid

eration by the I I. I plan to have my full set of concerns

and comments t• you prior to September 1, 1974.

J. W. Plummer

•