alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p

DEPARTMENT THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF TOE RORER SECRETARY

f •

•

MEMORANDUM

1130 - 10 Sept

Dr. McMillan

General Carter called, dictated the

attached memorandum for your information.

Mr. McCone wanted you to know what he was

sending over to the President's Board and

it would pleasure Mr. McCone if he had

some idea of what you were writing or were

going to say before Mr. McCone goes over

on the 13th.

General Carter said be was highlighting

the memorandum signed by Mr. McCone -- just

to let you know what Mr. McCone said.

General Carter will not be in his office

until later this afternoon -- if you need

to get in touch with him.

Eleanor

i1,-11)411111111. "

SPECIAL-HAMLIN

t

•

.' •

•

. •

i•
ipEemi—HANDuNer •

11.211 j'

MEMORANDUM TO MR. BUNDY - TO THE PRESIDENT'S BOARD

REFERENCE: Mr. Bundy's memorandum of 7 June, subject:

National Reconnaissance Program

"The agreement between CIA and DOD continues as the

basic charter. While both of us, CIA and DOD, did as much

as possible to insure that no ambiguity or areas of possible

conflict were contained in this agreement, its implementation

has brought forth certain areas needing clarification.

Most of these areas have now been identified and have been

the subject of discussion in the past several weeks between

and among Dr. Whelan, General Carter, and myself for CIA,

and Dr. McMillan, Dr. Fubini and Mr. Gilpatric for DOD. It

is,perhaps, premature at this time to state whether these

discussions will bring about a need to revise this agreement.

However, in light of the significance of the program to which

this agreement addresses itself and your known interest in it,

I will insure that you are kept advised of any significant

changes that may take place."

s/ JOHN A. McCONE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6835

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY EDWARD ZELLNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-99-164; CA-01-311-2) Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Edward Zellner, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Edward Zellner seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider judgment. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). The denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is the final order in a habeas proceeding and thus requires a certificate of appealability for appeal. Reid v. Angelone , F.3d , , 2004 WL 1119646, at *4 (4th Cir. May 19, 2004) (No. 03-6146). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zellner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.- 3 - DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Philip
McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
Communications, Inc.





Date:
      August 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Philip M. McDermottName:
              Philip
      M. McDermottTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Control

" • - •

••

'4•1'

%l.

•

•

•

EXUDED FIVA AUTOMATIC REGRkir;

DOD DIR. 5200.10 DOES NOT

-• ARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

11024611Pr

2 3 JUL Ea

1111110RANDUM YOB The nerdy Director (Rsearch), CIA

Sew* Meer foe the OM Mad

b Tim d the basic oft.titt resparibildkee et tar CIA nabs the term d the $ Ma ]0s ems, I believe that it woad be

well to ands" eft at the CIA Securitypersurel to the 0101110 litaff. I wield Frame that be be the Chid levaity Meer ddr idatt, end that he hoe as Air forcerettber as Ms ardataut. se

mead be resposeible tor luseligaZl security ratters which

require edits by **Agm OWL

I you costar, we cas deems the solectioo at this iwiteiduel

at your coaTedeece.

orpsesarrus moot MINCIIIILTARY

Joseph V. Claryk

Director

Adritatteas1 deccnssaissame

-07,4

CnAY---.3...C.T.

P1.66n.......LnOfa.......Pagells •

CrwItrel 11141-4
# Mapping Riverscapes to Support Productive and Resilient Working Lands

LandWetlandsAgricultural Conservation Easement Program

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  Mapping Riverscapes to Support Productive and Resilient Working Lands 

On May 2 at 2:00 p.m. eastern, Dr. Joseph Wheaton, Utah State University, and Jeremy Maestas, NRCS Western National Technical Support Center, will share new findings on effectively targeting wetland restorations in the intermountain West during our free, one-hour Conservation Outcomes Webinar.

## Registration

This virtual webinar will be hosted on Microsoft Teams. No registration is required.

Access Additional Webinar Information, Including Instructions to Join

Healthy riverscapes, with connected floodplains and rich riparian wetlands, are critical pieces of natural infrastructure that reduce the risk of floods, drought, and wildfire, and increase the resiliency of water resources, working lands, and rural economies. Managing rivers and streams as systems that include riparian wetlands helps maximize these benefits.

**On May 2 at 2:00 p.m. eastern**, Dr. Joseph Wheaton with Utah State University’s Department of Watershed Sciences and Jeremy Maestas, a Sagebrush Ecosystems Specialist with the NRCS Western National Technical Support Center, will share new findings on effectively targeting wetland restorations in the riverscapes of the intermountain West during our free, one-hour Conservation Outcomes Webinar. This webinar will provide key takeaways from a study, co-developed by Utah State University and USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project, on leveraging the Valley Bottom Extraction Tool (VBET) to identify current wetland and riverscape health in key Western U.S. watersheds, create tools to inform conservation, and document outcomes of restoration efforts. Findings may be used to support conservation planning and assessment, and on-the-ground management decisions, in riverscapes across the region.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

KWMANE DEON MAYS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 18-3061 

(D.C. No. 5:16-CR-40097-DDC-1) 

(D. Kan.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

Kwmane Deon Mays accepted a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement 

and pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He was sentenced to time served and three years of 

supervised release. But he violated the terms of his supervised release, and the 

district court revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to twelve months and 

one day of imprisonment and another eighteen months of supervised release. 

Although his plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, Mr. Mays appealed from 

the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. The government moves 

 *

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 24, 2018

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 

(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

Under Hahn, we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the 

scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and 

voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would 

result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. We need not address a Hahn factor 

that the appellant does not contest. See United States v. Porter, 405 F.3d 1136, 1143 

(10th Cir. 2005). 

In his response to the government’s motion, Mr. Mays, through counsel, states 

that he does not object to the enforcement of the appeal waiver as to this direct 

appeal. He does not contest any of the Hahn factors. Accordingly, the motion to 

enforce is granted, and this matter is terminated. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1459

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ADAM A. STONE,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 5, 2009, is amended

as follows:

On page 13, footnote 7, line 6, delete the quotation mark

between "15" and "and".
-1111,1111/1-

(5) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

wmmoomMkoc.

los

THE NRO STAFF 3 June 1977

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, PROGRAM B

SUBJECT: NRO Consultants

This is in response to your memorandum of 20 April 1977

providing comments on the proposed NRO policy for use of consultants. We appreciate your thoughts on the proposed policy

and have incorporated them where applicable. We recognise

ur u of consultants as members of a team, such as the

echnical Advisory Panel, and we believe that the conpolicy provisions are advisory instead of mandatory

in this type of situation as opposed to a situation where a

NRO Program Office employs a single consultant with expertise

in a particular scientific area in order for him to provide

technical services on a number of different problems. Whereas

the results of a panel action become known at the conclusion

of the effort, the results of a personal services consultant's

efforts working ad hoc problems might be difficult to track

unless we asked for reports to be written.

We also recognise that your consultant and Determination

and Findings approvals stem from the OCI's statute authority.

Therefore, the NRO Staff's assistance in obtaining these

approvals would not be necessary.

I have discussed with Dr. Cook and1111111111kour offer

to provide periodic overviews of consul vities and

they agree that these reports would be very valuable. We

uld appreciate it if Program 8 could provide the DNRO with

sports of panel activities and recommendations where NRO

tters are considered. Also we would appreciate reports

(quarterly or yearly as appropriate) on the activities of

personal services consultants who support your efforts.

Thank you very such for your help and comments on this

reposed policy.

•••
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Annual Report of Consortium Service
Management  Group,  Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ended
December  31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Donald S. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer
of  the  Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/  Donald  S.  Robbins
Dated:  May  5,  2004         --------------------------------------------------
                              Donald  S.  Robbins
                              President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.
















                                                                      Exhibit 32
# C_2005064EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 March 2005

(2005/C 64/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3383 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0958 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5503 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,58 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1860 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5824 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,625 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4326 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0054 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 001 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,756 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7301 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6911 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6113 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4386 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8066 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1679 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0144 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3383

JPY

Japanese yen

139,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0958

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5503

ISK

Iceland króna

78,58

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1860

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5824

CZK

Czech koruna

29,625

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4326

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0054

ROL

Romanian leu

36 001

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,756

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7301

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6911

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6113

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4386

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8066

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1679

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,52

ZAR

South African rand

8,0144

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1146 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1146

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit 
  further reductions in sodium levels and to reinstate the grain-rich 
  requirements applicable to the national school lunch and breakfast 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself, Mr. King, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. 
Risch) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
        to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit 
  further reductions in sodium levels and to reinstate the grain-rich 
  requirements applicable to the national school lunch and breakfast 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy School Meals Flexibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SODIUM TARGET LEVELS; WHOLE GRAIN REQUIREMENT.

    Section 9(f) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1758(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Sodium target levels.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary shall not implement any 
        regulation under this Act, the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 
        U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 
        (Public Law 111-296), or any other law that would require a 
        reduction in the quantity of sodium contained in federally 
        reimbursed meals, foods, and snacks sold in schools below 
        Target 1 (as described in section 220.8(f)(3) of title 7, Code 
        of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)).
            ``(6) Whole grain requirement.--Notwithstanding the final 
        rule of the Secretary entitled `Nutrition Standards in the 
        National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs' (77 Fed. 
        Reg. 4088 (January 26, 2012)) or any other provision of law--
                    ``(A) the Secretary shall only require that half of 
                all grains in federally reimbursed meals, foods, and 
                snacks sold in schools are whole grain-rich; and
                    ``(B) school food authorities shall comply with the 
                applicable grain component or standard with respect to 
                the school lunch or school breakfast program that was 
                in effect prior to July 1, 2014.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 99-60342

Summary Calendar

__________________________

PERRIN HURDLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(95-CV-247-BrR)

_____________________________________________

October 27, 1999

Before POLITZ, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam*

In this appeal from the dismissal of his employment

discrimination suit, asserted under the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq., PlaintiffAppellant Perrin Hurdle asks us to reverse the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Sears,

Roebuck & Company. Hurdle complains that the district court
erred in concluding that he failed to allege facts sufficient to

make out a prima facie case of age discrimination.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Hazen Paper Company v.

Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993), controls this case. Whether the

court applies the age discrimination test applicable to

individual employee discharges, see Price v. Marathon Cheese

Corp., 119 F.3d 330, 336-37 (5th Cir. 1997), or the one

applicable to reductions in force, see Woodhouse v. Magnolia

Hosp., 92 F.3d 248, 252 (5th Cir. 1996), Hurdle bears the burden

of producing evidence that he was discriminated against because

of his age. The essence of Hurdle’s complaint is that he was

discharged because his pension benefits were about to vest. The

Supreme Court explicitly stated in Hazen Paper, however, that “a

decision by [a] company to fire an older employee solely because

he... is <close to vesting’ would not constitute discriminatory

treatment on the basis of age.” 507 U.S. at 612. Such conduct

may be actionable under other substantive laws, such as ERISA,

but it does not involve the inaccurate and stigmatizing

stereotyping that is the essence of an ADEA claim. Id at 611-12.

Hurdle does not point to any other evidence that would

support the inference that he was discriminated against because

of his age. The new management position created by Sears,

Roebuck & Co.’s restructuring and reorganization, a position to

which Hurdle argues he was entitled, was filled by a 57-year old

employee who was 9 years older than the 48-year old Hurdle. 
Hurdle simply has presented no evidence that he was discriminated

against because of his age. As such, the decision of the

district court must be

AFFIRMED.
Director

Dr. Brockway McMillan

Director, NRO

Department of Defense

Washington, D. C.

cc: SecDef

•

. •

. • •.

r•

. lerZelor: ;

0077-64 Copy_i_

11n40% ••n ••• •••• •••••nn

•

••

•

•

11

711.• • AA

THE MRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

Dear Brock:

13 June 1964

"ri On May 25th you wrote to me suggestin thg„,

possibility of using the ATLAS-AGEN

type of platform as a launching vehicle or the R N

payload. This would replace the THOR-AGENA booster.

I will be interested in the results of the analysis

which you indicate in the final sentence of your letter are

in process at the present time.

At first glance it appears to me that additional

costa and the availability of the ATLAS-AGENA combinations might weigh heavily in the decision. This would be

particularly true if there are developing increasing

I appreciate this suggestion was made during the

darkest hours of CORONA troubles. Perhaps the recent

success will also influence the final decision. In any

event. please let me hear from you when this study is

finished so that we can reach a conclusion. and certainly

we must do all possible to improve the dependability of

the CORONA.