alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wyoming Chapter NECA/Local Union IBEW #415Southern Inside Agreement(Albany, Goshen, Laramie, and Platte Counties)Wage/Fringe SummaryJanuary 1, 2013 to March 1, 2014EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONSPAYROLL DEDUCTIONSWAGE NEBF JATCHEALTH PensionAnnuityLMCC ADMIN TOTALDUES LMCC STOCKERRATE3% 2.00% $5.50 $3.06 $2.50 $0.03 0.80% PKG.5% $0.04 $0.05Wireman General Foreman31.16$ 0.93$ 0.62$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.25$ 44.06$1.56$ 0.04$ 0.05$5% Wireman Foreman < 4 JW27.27$ 0.82$ 0.55$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.21$ 39.93$1.36$ 0.04$ 0.05$10% Wireman Foreman >4 JW28.57$ 0.86$ 0.57$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.23$ 41.32$1.43$ 0.04$ 0.05$Journeyman Wireman25.97$ 0.78$ 0.52$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.21$ 38.57$1.30$ 0.04$ 0.05$1st Period Apprentices 55%14.28$ 0.43$ 0.29$ 5.50$ -$ -$ 0.03$ 0.11$ 20.64$-$ 0.04$ 0.05$2nd Period Apprentices 60%15.58$ 0.47$ 0.31$ 5.50$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.12$ 24.52$-$ 0.04$ 0.05$3rd Period Apprentices 65%16.88$ 0.51$ 0.34$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.14$ 28.95$0.32$ 0.04$ 0.05$4th Period Apprentices 70%18.18$ 0.55$ 0.36$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.15$ 30.32$0.35$ 0.04$ 0.05$5th Period Apprentices 75%19.48$ 0.58$ 0.39$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.16$ 31.70$0.74$ 0.04$ 0.05$6th Period Apprentices 85%22.07$ 0.66$ 0.44$ 5.50$ 3.06$ 2.50$ 0.03$ 0.18$ 34.44$1.10$ 0.04$ 0.05$Vacation: 5% Volunteer deductionCOPE: $.05 Volunteer deductionSubsistance:30 Miles & Over $30.005/8 Overtime Schedule> 8 hours Mon. - FridaySaturday: 1 1/2 X up to 12 hours After 12 hours 2XSunday & Holidays: 2 XApprentice working dues rate vary depending upon the period they are in.1st & 2nd Period 0% 5th Period 4%3rd & 4th Period 2% 6th Period 5%Updated 01/24/2012
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation de Belgique (Court of Cassation, Belgium) (First Chamber), by order of that court of 20 January 2005, in the case of the Belgian State v Ring Occasions and Fortis Banque

(Case C-42/05)

(2005/C 93/17)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Cour de cassation de Belgique (First Chamber), of 20 January 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between the Belgian State and Ring Occasions and Fortis Banque, on the following questions:

----
Home Deadliest Most Expensive Blowouts Collapse Sunk Rigs Hurricanes Rig List Guestbook Links



# Adriatic IV

1. GSF Adriatic IV at Temsah before the blowout

2. GSF Adriatic IV blowout

3. Petrobel plaform burning

4. Petrobel plaform burning 

### Rig: GSF Adriatic IV Jack-Up
Date: 10 August 2004
Location: Temsah, Mediterranean Sea, Egypt Operator: Platform run by Petrobel

Summary In August 2004, the Adriatic IV was on location over the Temsah gas production platform, off Port Said, Egypt in the Mediterranean. The rig was drilling a natural gas well when a gas blowout occurred during drilling ops. Reports state that there was an explosion followed by fire which was initially contained on the jack-up. For reasons unknown, the fire then spread to the Petrobel-run platform where it continued to rage for over a week before being brought under control. More than 150 workers on the jack-up and platform were evacuated with no casualties, due in part to the prior recommendation that production activities be ceased as a precautionary measure.

Global Santa Fe reported the Adriatic IV as sunk and not salvageable. The platform, owned jointly by BP, Italy's ENI and Egypt's General Petroleum Corporation was damaged beyond repair and its destruction was ordered by Egypt's petroleum minister. Less than a year after the accident, production at the Temsah field was back on-stream at full production rates.

Sources: Rigzone Business Today Egypt

Photos 1. Tecon Engineering: GSF Adriatic IV at Temsah 2,3 & 4. More photos of the fire

[ Home | Deadliest | Most Expensive | Blowouts | Collapse | Sunk Rigs | Hurricanes | Rig List | Links ] 

# Pa g e 1 of 1 GSF Adriatic IV - Oil Ri g Disasters - Offshore Drillin g Accidents

11/29/2011 htt p ://home.versatel.nl/the

_ sims/ri g /adriatic4.htm
CORONA HANDLE V1A 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112127 HANDLE VIA 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

llllllllllllllllllllll!!ll~~rulJl~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

November 26, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Meeting with NASA on the CORONA System 

Dr. Naka called a meeting on November 19 to discuss with NASA 

the offer made by Dr. Mc Lucas to use CORONA vehicles in the ERS 

role. Present from the NRO were Dr. Naka, Captain Geiger, Major 

Schow and I. NASA was represented by Mr. Jaffe, 

~---------- andl I all c~l_e_a_r_e_d_a_t_l_e_a_s_t TK. 

Mr. Jaffe said that as a first requirement NASA needs a product 

with a ground resolution on the order of 100 feet. They would like 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

three and perhaps four cameras operating simultaneously to gather a 

multispectral set of data. They would like an option to photograph an 

area of primary interest as many as four times within a 30 day mission. 

NASA does not yet have an answer to questions of trade-offs, such 

as covering large areas of the earth once during a mission or one area 

such as the continental U.S. several times. Nor do they really know 

the answer to the value of flying multispectral missions vs. using one 

type of film on a mission. It does appear that as a minimum they want 

to fly color IR film, and they prefer to break black and white coverage 

into at least three spectral regions. 

NASA anticipates going to NRO contractors with questions, but 

Mr. Jaffe assured us that they would go through this office in doing so. 

He also recognized that possibly NASA funds would be involved for 

funded studies. He indicated that included in their studies could be 

options which would satisfy the needs of both NASA and the NRO, should 

the NRO require additional CORONA spacecraft. 

CONTROL NO, ______ _ 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET COPY ___ or ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112127 

PAGE. ___ OF ___ PAGES 
,. 

HANDLE VIA 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112127 HANDLE V1A 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Dr. Naka indicated he should like to address the security problem 

to the right people by the end of December and that we should proceed 

to answer questions on the ERS application of CORONA as soon as 

possible. To this end NASA was to try to generate questions for the 

NRO to answer in about one week. 

In a conversation between Captain Geiger and Mr. Jaffe outside 

of this meeting, NASA had indicated that they hoped to be able to conduct this project by clearing only three additional people for CORONA 

access:~------------~ and 

FREDERICK L. HOFMANN 

Major, USAF 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112127 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES
Prepared by MerrillDirect





EXHIBIT 10.2


SECOND

EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION

OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


             THIS SECOND EXTENSION AND
MODIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Extension") is entered
into as of April 30, 2001 by and between California Coastal Communities,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Employer"), and RAYMOND J. PACINI
("Executive").


W
I T N E S S E T H:


             WHEREAS, Executive and Employer
have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 1998 and
Extension and Modification of Employment Agreement dated December 7, 1999
(collectively, the "Employment Agreement") through which Executive
has provided various executive capacities to Employer and Employer has obtained
various executive services by Executive; and


             WHEREAS, Employer desires to obtain
the benefit of continued service from Executive by extending the Employment
Agreement, and Executive desires to render continued services to Employer by
extending the Employment Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this
Extension;


             NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises and covenants herein contained,
the parties agree as follows:


             SECTION 1.     CONTINUING EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT.  Except to the extent of any modification
made pursuant to the terms of this Extension, the Employment Agreement shall
continue to remain in full force and effect following the date hereof.


             SECTION 2.     EXTENSION OF TERM. 
Employer and Executive hereby agree to extend the term of the Employment
Agreement until April 30, 2003.


             SECTION 3.     BASE SALARY.  From
the date hereof and until the expiration of the term set forth in
Section 2 above, Employer agrees to pay Executive a base salary of at
least Two Hundred and Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($275,000) per year in semi–monthly
installments on the same dates the other senior officers of Employer are paid.





 


             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have executed this Extension as of the date first above written.





	"EMPLOYER"


	CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMUNITIES, INC.


	By	/s/  SANDRA G. SCIUTTO


	 	Sandra G. Sciutto 
	 	Chief Financial Officer


	"EXECUTIVE"


	      
  /s/  RAYMOND J. PACINI


	Raymond J. Pacini
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)


[LOGO]                 INTERTAN, INC.

                        [LETTERHEAD OF INTERTAN, INC.]

February 19, 2001

Mr. Brian Levy
3300 Highway # 7
Suite 904
Concord, ON
L4K 4M3

Dear Brian:

       Re: Clarification & Amendment to June 10, 1999 Employment Letter

     You and InterTAN, Inc. (the "Company") entered into an employment letter
agreement dated June 10, 1999 (the "Employment Letter Agreement").

     By way of clarification to subsection (c) of the section entitled
"Severance Benefits" and the section entitled "Change of Control" in the
Employment Letter Agreement, we wish to confirm that the terms "change of
control" and "change in control" used therein in respect of the Company's
Deferred Compensation Plan will be deemed to have occurred if any of the events
described in Sections 8.5 (a), (b) or (c) of the Company's Deferred Compensation
Plan, as amended, takes place.

     Additionally, subsection (c) of the section entitled "Severance Benefits"
in the Employment Letter Agreement is hereby amended so that the aggregate
amount of the severance benefits to which you may become entitled pursuant to
the Employment Letter Agreement in the event a "change of control" takes place
shall now be payable in a single lump sum payment rather than in equal
installments over a twenty-four (24) month period.

                                                       Sincerely,
                                                       InterTAN, Inc.

                                                       /s/ Ron G. Stegall

                                                       By: Ron G. Stegall
                                                           Chairman of the Board

Acknowledged and Agreed
this  20th day of February 2001.

/s/ Brian E. Levy
_____________________________
Brian E. Levy
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                 Name of Subsidiary                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                 ------------------                -----------------------------

   Telefonica Multimedia S.A.C.                                  Peru

   Telefonica Servicios Integrados S.A.C.                        Peru

   Transporte Urgente de Mensajeria S.A.C.                       Peru

   Telefonica Servicios Comerciales S.A.C.                       Peru

   Telefonica Soluciones Globales Holding S.A.C.                 Peru

   Telefonica Servicios Digitales S.A.C.                         Peru

   Servicios Editoriales del Peru S.A.C.                         Peru

   Telefonica Globales de Telecomunicaciones S.A.C.              Peru

   Telefonica Servicios Tecnicos S.A.C.                          Peru
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00168

- CR

Edward VARGAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6559

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 7, 2014.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
# Tennessee State Office

801 Broadway, 675 US CourthouseNashvilleTN37203

615-277-2564

801 Broadway, 675 US CourthouseNashvilleTN37203

Tennessee

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Tennessee 
-  Tennessee State Office 

With the mission of “Helping people help the land,” the Natural Resources Conservation Service provides products and services that enable people to be good stewards of the Nation’s soil, water, and related natural resources on private lands.

## **Welcome to NRCS Tennessee!**

### ***Sheldon Hightower, State Conservationist***

----

##   Tennessee Leadership Team

##   Tennessee NRCS Directories

NRCS Tennessee State Personnel Directory(1.15 MB)

Nashville State Office Personnel_02.02.2023.pdf(155.94 KB)

Tennessee NRCS Service Centers by County(736.63 KB)

Tennessee Area One Service Centers(310.42 KB)

Tennessee Area Two Service Centers(353.42 KB)

Tennessee Area Three Service Centers(310.7 KB)

Tennessee Area Four Service Centers(369.34 KB)
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114981 

IDEALIST - U-2 Hl,GH ALTITUDE PHOTO, ~----~ ELINT AIRCRAFT 

S'fSl5M UEMENTS 

Ull)(::,l(,MIID SINGl-1 ll'LACE AIICUFT 

NAiff Ii WMtTMIY J-75-P-13 ENGINE 

H¥.., Slttllf '\/ltmc,u FIJ\Mi c;~IUi. 

ll'ffl ~ SJIIIO CAMBA (el .. ...._) 

1'1:JWd tN$1'1U16&NJS ti CAMIRA 

~-~ 

IL_, IHCIJVIH 

KM SYSIIMI 

'AY~OAD DATA 

MAM£ CAMEIA ----- 36" Fl, 1, • .S' IHS 

:uao x 4,7 NM STIIUO (-.-. 5 no; 

,AN, CAMHA ------ 24" FL, 1' HS 

2100 x 11 NM sn110 COVElAGf 

Nt CAMillA - Q..5 MILURAlMAN US, ±H DEG SCAN 

5000 MM COVUAGJ! 

El.INT 

PERFORMANCE DATA (U-2-R) 

AUITUDE 

MACH 

RANGE 

". 77,0QO• 

0.12 

4000 NM 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114981
# C_2005060EN.01000601.xml

| 10.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3641 — BT/Infonet)

(2005/C 60/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 January 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                           /s/ J. Ardie Dillen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: J. Ardie Dillen
                                           Title: Chairman, President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2002

                                       22
#### J. B. Bradford Piano Company, Respondent, vs. Jack Hing Wong and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Wm. F. Quick*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Edgar L. Wood*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
L. Knighton, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                                   /s/ JAMES L. KNIGHTON
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James L. Knighton
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2196

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2017

 Mr. Russell (for himself, Mr. Cummings, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES.

    Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or to the Inspector'' and all that follows through ``such 
disclosures'' and inserting ``the Inspector General of an agency, a 
supervisor in the employee's direct chain of command up to and 
including the head of the employing agency, the Director of National 
Intelligence, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, or 
to an employee designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for 
the purpose of receiving such disclosures''.
                                 <all>
```
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 04 9- CR Manuel SCH AF ER , J r., Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No. 7, Be x ar County , Texas Trial Court No. 205672 Honora ble Monica E. Gue rre ro, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice

Catherine Stone, Justi ce Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 25, 2008 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON Appellant wa s place d on defe rre d adjudication community supervision on Marc h 14, 2007. On May 7, 2007, the trial cour

t e x tended the term of a

ppellant’s community

supervision. On January 24, 2008, appellant f

iled a motion for leave to file a late notice of

appea l. M o d if ic a ti o no f p r o b a ti o nis n o t a

p p e a la b le a t t h e ti me o f

mo d ification. S

ee B asaldua v. Sta te , 5 58 S.W. 2d

2, 5 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 77 ). Mo re ov e r, the c le rk ’s re c or d f ile d in thi s a pp e a l04
- 08
- 00 04 9- CR

- 2- contains no indication that appe llant filed a timely notice of appea l w ith the trial court. I n order for t h i s c o u rt t o h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n , a n o t i c e o f a p p e a l m u s tb e f

i l e d i nt h e t r i a l c o u rtw i t h i nf i f t e e n d a ys
a ft e r t he de a dli ne fo r f

ili ngthe no tic e of

a pp e a l and a mot ion fo r e xten sio n of tim e mus t be tim e ly filed in this court. Ol iv o v . S tat e , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). On May 28, 2008, we or dere d appellant to show c ause in w riting why this appeal should not be d is mi ssed

fo r w ant o f j ur isd ic tio n. Ap pe lla nt d id n ot r e sp on d to our o rd e r. Th is a pp e a l is dismiss ed for

lack of jurisdiction. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
# Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) (9/16) Standard Document(123.79 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) Overview(317.44 KB)

Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) CPPE(25.83 KB)

Critical Area Planting (Ac.) (342) Network Diagram(139.2 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More