alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-13001) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Plan
and the 1996 Director Option Plan of Borealis Technology Corporation of our
report dated January 20, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of
Borealis Technology Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                            ----------------------
                                                Ernst & Young LLP
Reno, Nevada
March 25, 1997
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.

AUSTIN, TEXAS C0(JRr~^jP Ify

NO. WR-64,532-03

KEITH L. CARTER, RELATOR

V.

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, RESPBNDENT

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

C»l5ie NO. F-Q242680-RV

IN THE 292nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

l/Vi^vor

7 2015

th D'STRICT

ORDER

Relator filed a previous mandamus pursuant to the jurisdiction of this Court.

In it he contends that he filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

in the 992nd judicial district Court of Dallas County, Texas.

In an attempt to proceed under jurisdictional procedure where such Writ of

Habeas Corpus is ordered by the convicting Trial Court to the Clerk of the

District Court to send such Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus to this

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Under legal analysis perspective additional facts have been provided through

due diligence that all records, except the original Writ of Habeas Corpus,

nor a copy of the Writ of Habeas Corpus has been sent in compliance and order

by the Trial Court or mandamus order by the Court of Criminal Appeals of

Texas under the supra number WR-64,532-03 where evidence shows no Application

for Writ of Habeas Corpus was with the records sent by the Clerk of- Dallas

County, Texas.

further the continuation of such delay of Habeas proceeding process is violaitve .under State and Federal Constitutional Law when the State's highest

Court can not proceed accordingly due to District Clerk failure to obey such

order at his or her discretion after (McCree v. Hampton) have expired and

no Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus have not been provided accordingly.

Relator - Pro se RECEIVED IN

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 23 2015

KLC/trh

cc;file; Abel Acosta,Clerk
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

APRIL 1, 2015

HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK.

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. EOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

SUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

RE:^KEITH L. CARTER V. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

TRL. CT. NO.. F-0242680-RV

Dear Ms. Pearson:

Enclosed for filing is Relator's "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" accordingly.

Please give notice upon receipt.

Thank you respectfully for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Keith L. Carter

Relator - Applicant

KLC/trh

cc:fiie;
2011 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-18-2011

CBS Corporation v. FCC

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-3575

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2011

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2011 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"CBS Corporation v. FCC" (2011). 2011 Decisions. Paper 132.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2011/132
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3575

___________

CBS CORPORATION;

CBS BROADCASTING INC.;

CBS TELEVISIONSTATIONS INC.;

CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS L.P.;

and KUTV HOLDINGS, INC.,

Petitioners

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents

_______________________

Petition for Review of Orders of the

Federal Communications Commission

FCC Nos. 06-19 and 06-68

______________

Argued September 11, 2007

Decided July 21, 2008

Certiorari Granted, Judgment Vacated and Remanded

from the Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 2009

Argued on Remand February 23, 2010

Before: SCIRICA, RENDELL and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

During the course of the litigation Mr. Jerome Shestack co-counsel for CBS joined the 

law firm of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP, but did not file a change of address 

with the Clerk. Mr. Shestack has since passed away. 
At the direction of the Court it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion shall be 

amended to reflect the change as follows:

Jerome J. Shestack, Esq.

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP

1600 Market Street

Suite 3600

Philadelphia, PA 19103

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: November 18, 2011
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08549 

.-

MDl'>t:tAN:ot1M rOI: Mr.. Peter Jessup 

loom 300 

Executive Office Building 

July 12, 1968 

The attacbed unclasaified doeumentation details )lASAr. plans fot: 

Qbtainittg photolraphy of the earth from the Apollo '1 ••• ion. This 

mie.ion tl expected t.o be launched no earlier than September 19, 

1968. The photographic experiments will be 411.14)80"1' to thO •• flown 

on Gemitd. miesion. and, as in Gellini. wilt be conducted with ,. handheld lWJselblad camera with the s ... focal length telUl_ ATV camera 

wUI be incorporated into this mlssion to provide r •• l-t1. TV 

coverage. This will Gerve operational purposes through' observation 

of activities priDUU:'ily wtthi·n the Coanand Module, but .OM ground 

observaUon will be included. The video signal wt11 be avanable 

for rebroadcast on commercial TV. 

The s .. attachmenta have been p1:ovided to Hr. Jobn 2. tirk. of the 

DOD and to Mr .. WilHam A. Tidwell of tbe CIA. 

-

David Williamson. Jr. 

Attachments 

1. Inf.. on NASA· 8 PreUm.. Plana 

for Ea1:tb Ob •• nation from 

Apollo '1 (uncl .. sified) 

2. Apollo 20'/101 experiment Guide 

for S005 and S006 (uncl ... ified) 

3. Apollo 7 Command Module Televiaton 

s.. •• y.t .... <_1" .. U1ed) Thi, ~t-c:'?;:~{~.t~ pages 

No . .... e:L: ... of . ... & .... Copies, Sed&s.:t.L. .... 

) 

CONCURRENCES 

GPO 942·383 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08549
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  1.
    
    Dynamex Operations East Inc., a Delaware corporation - 10,000 authorized
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and
outstanding and registered in the name of Dynamex Inc.2.
    
    Dynamex Operations West Inc., a Delaware corporation - 10,000 authorized
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and
outstanding and registered in the name of Dynamex Inc.3.
    
    Dynamex Canada Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation - 10,000 authorized
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 of which are issued and
outstanding and registered in the name of Dynamex Inc.4.
    
    Dynamex Provincial Couriers, Inc., a Delaware corporation - 10,000
authorized shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 of which are
issued and outstanding and registered in the name of Dynamex Inc.5.
    
    Road Runner Transportation, Inc., a Minnesota corporation - 25,000
authorized common shares (consisting of 7,000 voting, 5,000 non-voting and
13,000 undesignated), no par value; of which 4,363.9998 non-voting are
issued and outstanding in the name of Dynamex Inc., and of which 6,545
voting are issued and outstanding in the name of Dynamex Inc.6.
    
    New York Document Exchange Corp., a New York corporation - 200 shares of
common stock are authorized, no par value, of which 150 shares are issued
and outstanding in the name of Dynamex Inc.7.
    
    Dynamex Dedicated Fleet Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation - 10,000
authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.01, 1,000 of which are
issued and outstanding and registered in the name of Dynamex Inc.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Onyx Software Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-50428) on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos.333-72235, 333-55414, and 333-63214) on Form S-8 of Onyx Software Corporation of our report dated January 24, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Onyx Software Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended and the related 2002 financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-Kof Onyx Software Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

March 20, 2003
# C_2005115EN.01001802.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/18

---

Removal from the register of Joined Cases C-426/03, C-427/03, C-428/03 and C-429/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/34)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 15 December 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Joined Cases C-426/03, C-427/03, C-428/03 and C-429/03: (references for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Massa Carrara): GE.M.E.G. Srl v Comune di Carrara CERIT SpA.(C-426/03), OMYA Spa v Comune di Carrara (C-427/03), Roberto Lorenzoni v Comune di Carrara Bipielle Riscossioni SpA (C-428/03) and DUEGI TRASPORTI Srl v Comune di Carrara (C-429/03).

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.01.2004.

1

---
r•4

19 .... r

^.• ..:

L• • I• • •

I •

C

1.

C

.

I

I

w

F 5 w,

^Rr

'IC'

.SG`ttANDVl'Ad a^ ^F OF STAFF, IISAF

B 3CT: U & PoUcy ccoeon sr l tçaco vow

T1

 toad CamMI k e c to Peaa^ Vca a Gtr,

11

DIz will tr"r1e of the lo of rccwy

:.t3 ' "' which will Otis It a Cow of C'!!s CO ., y v'^o to c a^

d7 !s the terx1L y of caother ooa sy. Caa of l * q tt:at coo up is that of the of by s►r.3i"e^.

L eaca:c tttan with o' paro^rtt^mar t tc b c^ t, I t-.^; it ;

c. r lr the Ti to p.rad tar c c;oL^ p ts az a 3 s '•^r ca vh tie h !t 

d ^ ^ sod! b

o

 as 

t

o cibjz a 

c

e 

r

te. il

^

-

1r sof ^ i ' t rIri. i c flM•..^it Y.i► ►^r+fr/

a cc_31 ive cam. " cd tea gactitics In o3 tc Cr : :hr c:.e^g =3

/ti 

to bat £ yrs I c etb L"it xc Q w t t

CO U In the 3C8.

Ple: e h sash a pap dvel io &ty c z!d az derb

tbo ::Srt tt l Pdui7 l%Z.

SC3 F. Ct^-;►^

Urdar a3cr. of L' L^ rt=:.a

Ft3 B/F

BAFU3

BAFAl1
#### Meyer, Appellant, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Michael Levin*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
.. .aI, 

FILED 

MF: I' 2610 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

NANCY MAYER WHIITINGTON, CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

Robert R. Matthews, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

10 D431 

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The 

application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff is a veteran of the armed services with the service-connected disability. He objects to an 

advisory opinion issued by the central ,office of the Department of Veterans Affairs and to a 

determination of the date of receipt of claim or date entitlement arose in his case. See Compl. at 1-2. He 

seeks an order directing the defendant to correct the alleged errors. Id. at 2. 

A federal district court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and it has jurisdiction expressly 

precludes review of the Secretary's decisions regarding a veteran's benefits. 

The Secretary shall decide all questions of law and fact necessary to a decision by the 

Secretary under a law that affects the provision of benefits by the Secretary to veterans 

or their dependents or survivors of veterans. Subject to [certain enumerated exceptions], 

the decision of the Secretary as to any such question shall be final and conclusive and 

may not be reviewed by any other official or by any court, whether by an action in the 

nature of mandamus or otherwise. 

38 U.S.C. § Sll(a). As the exceptions to this provision do not appear applicable, the complaint must be 

dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

United States District Judge 

3
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114965 

\. 

Tho 

felt you ,,;.mt to be 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114965
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS

388TH DISTRICT COURT

IN THE MATTER OF §

THE MARRIAGE OF: §

§

MIGUEL ZAVALA MEJIA §

§

Petitioner, § Cause No. 2018 DCV 4780

§

and §

§

YOLANDA ZAVALA §

§

Respondent, §

_____________________________________________________

YOLANDA ZAVALA'S NOTICE OF APPEAL

______________________________________________________

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:

Petitioner files this notice of appeal and would show the court as follows: 

1. The trial court in this case was the 388th District Court, El Paso 

County, Texas.

2. The case's trial court number is 2018 DCV 4780. 

3. The style of the case is: In the Matter of the Marriage of: Miguel Zavala 

and Yolanda Zavala. 

4. The date of the judgment or order appealed from is December 20, 2023.

5. Respondent desires to appeal.

6. The appeal is taken to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso Texas.

7. The name of the party filing this notice of appeal is Yolanda Zavala.

Filed 1/19/2023 7:52 PM

2018DCV4780

Norma Favela Barceleau

El Paso County - 388th District Court

District Clerk

El Paso County

 FILED IN 8th COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 1/20/2023 9:26:51 AM ELIZABETH G. FLORES Clerk
Respectfully Submitted,

PAUL F. GRAJEDA

ATTORNEY AT LAW

416 N. Stanton Street, Suite 601

El Paso, Texas 79901

Telephone: (915) 534-7285

Facsimile: (915) 534-7287

paulfgrajeda@mac.com

By: /s/ Paul F. Grajeda PAUL F. GRAJEDA

 State Bar No. 00796661

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to TEX R. CIV. P. 21 and 21a, I hereby certify on this the 19th day of 

January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served via the 

court's efiling system.

/s/ Paul F. Grajeda 

PAUL F. GRAJEDA
Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.

The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system

on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing

certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a

certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Paul Grajeda

Bar No. 796661

paulgrajeda@mac.com

Envelope ID: 71967120

Status as of 1/20/2023 8:03 AM MST

Associated Case Party: Yolanda Zavala

Name

PAUL FREDERICKGRAJEDA

BarNumber Email

paulgrajeda@mac.com

TimestampSubmitted

1/19/2023 7:52:07 PM

Status

SENT

Case Contacts

Name

c q

BarNumber Email

carlos@quinonezlawfirm.com

TimestampSubmitted

1/19/2023 7:52:07 PM

Status

SENT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         February 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 106 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-25, CP2015-34.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-02356 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2252 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to place a ten-year moratorium on oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities on the 

Outer Continental Shelf in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas and in the Eastern Gulf 

of Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. SANFORD (for himself and Mr. LOBIONDO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to place 

a ten-year moratorium on oil and gas preleasing, leasing, 

and related activities on the Outer Continental Shelf 

in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and 

Straits of Florida planning areas and in the Eastern 

Gulf of Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coastal Economies 

5 Protection Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2252 IH

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS PRELEASING, LEAS2 ING, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN 

3 AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF. 

4 Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1344) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(i) MORATORIUM ON OIL AND NATURAL GAS

8 PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN

9 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

10 ‘‘(1) MORATORIUM.—Effective during the pe11 riod beginning on the date of enactment of this sub12 section and ending on June 30, 2027, the Secretary 

13 shall not offer for leasing, preleasing, or any related 

14 activity on the following geographic areas of the 

15 outer Continental Shelf: 

16 ‘‘(A) The North Atlantic planning area. 

17 ‘‘(B) The Mid-Atlantic planning area. 

18 ‘‘(C) The South Atlantic planning area. 

19 ‘‘(D) The Straits of Florida Planning 

20 Area. 

21 ‘‘(E) The area of the Eastern Gulf of Mex22 ico described in section 104(a) of the Gulf of 

23 Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (title I of 

24 division C of Public Law 109–432; 43 U.S.C. 

25 1331 note). 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2252 IH

1 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON EFFECT.—Nothing in this 

2 subsection affects any right under any lease issued 

3 under this Act before the date of the enactment of 

4 this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
• 72ADQ3AMTOS UNIT'.STATES AIR FORGE

THE INSPECTW:GEKERAL

SPECIAL PROJECTS 110--fr '

Datd 26 Feb 70 

r • • . •

XEMORAEJZX FOR DR. EAU

Att....ned tb U-2 subject we discussed

with yok. yesterday. Would appreciate your

taX1..1. , 4 -ook at it before this goes to

•

FRANK W. HARTLIT, JR.

Colonel, USAF

APTGOS

Tri°

aet./ 106d ne,eaft.4.

,..i.44clut 4.490241

(AX

.. •
•

•

• • ,„ •

-1St NATIONAL. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

:

. s •

Me MR0 STAFF

W A Soil 04IGTON. •O.0

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

SUBJECT: U-ZC/G Storage CoMts

While estimates for flyable and dead storage options for

eight U-2C/G aircraft are being developed for FY 1971 financial

program/FY 1972 budget estimates, magnitude costs are available

based on previous examinatio se approximate

per year as NRO charges r year as oth

charges, for a total of

In addition to consideration of this relatively low

annual support cost, it should be recognized that a substantial

investment has been made in U-2C/O l s AGE, spares and miscellaneous hardware. The depot estimates there are ample stocks

on hand today to support the entire U-20/0 fleet for six to

nine months of operation (depending on the number of 0.L., .)

with no additional buys.

Two study groups chaired by Dr. Naka recently reviewed the

requirements and utilization of the U-2R aircraft. One of the

conclusions of these studies was that the 12 existing U-2R's

are sufficient to meet both the NRO and essential Air Force

operational requirements. An additional requirement for two

C/G's for transitional training and test purposes has been

recognized. Under current policy, the remaining C/G's are in

storage to replace U-2R attrition as it occurs. Otherwise,

there are no additional known NRO, CIA or Air Force requirements at this time with the priority to. warrant activating the

U-2C/O's from flyable storage. However, by virtue of the U-2's

unique altitude, airspeed and loiter capabilities, there is

still an untapped potential for future CIA or DOD ap

26 February 1970

Based on the possibility of future utilization o

11-20/0 platforms, the low annual upkeep support costs of the

stored aircraft and the substantial investment in existing

Depot stocks, recommend:

A•

•

-TOP-SECRET-IBEErt---

277.-

eactosso avosemsn •ateasua

we mew Imes wet ON WO

••••nn•••••11.0.••....
No salvage/scrapping action be considered for the

U-2C/G's during the FY71/72 budget reviews.

The possibility of transferring some part of the

stored U -2C/0 fleet to another agency such as NASA be further

explored.

TOP SECRET rt,r;rer-:, f •,

•

Colonel, USAF

Director, Program D

.. •

111111ft TOP SECRET .CST

muses nese wawa

CST

MS SIMMININ MOM Nell WNW

swan 277-*

PP,

ftet.... 2 nnn 2.24: