alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
friECRET1S)-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

• WASHINGTON. O C.

, • •

* r*".

THE NRO STAFF 2 June 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR SS-3

SUBJECT: Reevaluation ollIlltompartmentation

TALENT-KEYHOLE Security Guide attached to your

memo graphically shows that a majority of the information, with certain notable exceptions, concern the overhead

collection programs is available in either t TALENT- KEYHOLE systems. It is our opinion that this onalty

should be eliminated and with the exception of the NRO detailed

organization, advanced technical performance/configurations,

codewords, nicknames, funding, program number association, CIA

participation and contractual relationships, the remaining items

should be confined strictly within the TALENT-KEYHOLE compartmentation. This approach would greatly facilitate conversations

and the timely flow of data between the data users, operations

el and planners; while at the same time restricting the

organizational structure and program contractual

ents, which are not directly concerned with the intelligence product, to the absolute minimum number of pe el.

It is currently possible for two persons, one cleared 

and the other TALENT-KEYHOLE, to have knowledge of the

information but not be able to talk to each other. This appears

to be a self defeating situation.

The specific answers to your query are as follows:'

The NRO detailed organization and interag Program

Office participation should be retained within the ystem

to preclude wide dissemination of the overall aspec

management struoture and the fact of CIA involvement.

11111117

The codewords, nicknames and

6

ion with overt program numbers should be kept within the stem as they do

not affect the intelligence product but administrative use

within the various projects.

CONTROL NOjiittina

fNINSNATO&CgllIllrT LE O COPY OF COPILS EXIFOJ1 WI EWEN ON W

F

I

OONV M7 DECLASNRY ON MIND OUT. PAGE _„1,...,OF PAG FS
3. The dontractua

should remain within th

the development and tec

as they have no direct bearing

data produced.

hips and program funding

stem to. securely maintain

to and to minimize exposure

on the use of the intelligence

The advanced subsystem designs and configurations,

which show how it is possible to achieve the performance

40111111g 

by our various systems, should be confined to the

ompartmentation as knowledge of them is not required

in or er to use the resultant product data.

The remaining ly items listed in the Security

Guide have no valid rea n our opinion, for not being

included in the TALENT-KEYHOLE compartmentation. Most of the

details of these items can be inferred from other data already

releasable in the TALENT-KEYHOLE system.

Oro I A*

11.11001114111%1

Kin WIDICIMOO V Ps BM No

CONTROL NO

COPY2,___Of COM ES

PAGE Of PAGES
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

DEPARTMENT OF i nE AIR FORCE 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

MEMORANDUM 

111I11111II1111111I1111I1111II1111111.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!II11I1 14 00050527 D 

'" COLONEL~_ 

25 April 1968 

AFSC has asked us to hold their hand to 

obtain an advance foreign clearance for the 

recovery aircraft and to give approval in 

advance (waive AFSCM 60-1) for the recovery 

aircraft to deploy to foreign bases in an 

emergency (see 23 April 1968 letter). 

The probability of needing to deploy the 

recovery aircraft is remote) but I believe that 

it is only prudent to clear away the possible 

road blocks ahead of time. Therefore) recommend 

that we tell AFSC to go ahead and make the advance 

arrangements by sending them this answer. 

....... .\ 

d~-1!-1!!-~e~-1!---? ,Cc~ 

B~.-rl .. ", 

. ~ -=~ 

1 

! 

i 

~ 

~ , l 

, 

1 

, 

r 

! 

! 

! 

I 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 
. Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

W~ 

. J~ ~ ~ 1'14.t.,a. 

I 

I 

I 

I 

r 

I 

-

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 I 

~ 01<., ~,J I ~'JL. \ 'D-~. 

r 

l 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 
Approved e" 2019/05/02 C051 07322 for Releas " 

-! 

! 

, 

-

i 

I 

, 

, 

; 

) 

i 

-, 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

25 April 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR AFse (sess ) 

SUBJECT: Foreign Clearances 

Rb"'FERENCE: sess letter, same subject) dated 23 April 1968 

We agree that a waiver to AFSCM 60-1 shoUld be obtained 

to pennit the dispatch of recovery aircraft to foreign bases 

und.er emergency cond.i tions in support of programs llO and 8!~6 

and that foreign clearances should be obtained in advance to 

avoid possible delays ru~d mis~~der8tandings when an emergency 

arises. 

RUSSELL A. BERG 

Brigadier General, USAF 

Director 

Office of Space Systems 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

I 

I 

~ I 

~ 
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

25 April 1968 

MEMOR~WD1~ FOR AFSC (SCSS) 

SUBJECT: Foreign Clearances 

REFERENCE: SCSS letter) same subject) dated 23 April 1968 

We agree that a waiver to AFSCM 60-1 should be obtained 

to permit the dispatch of recovery aircraft to foreign bases 

under emergency conditions in support of programs 110 and 846 

and that foreign clearances should be obtained in advance to 

avoid possible delays and mislli~derstandings when an emergency 

arises. 

RUSSELL A. BERG 

Brigadier General) USAF 

Director 

Office of Space Systems 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07322 

r 

! 

, 

-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2229

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide permanent authority for 
  judicial review of certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions 
           relating to whistleblowers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``All Circuit Review Act''.
SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD DECISIONS 
RELATING TO WHISTLEBLOWERS.
    (a) In General.--Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``During the 5-year period beginning on 
the effective date of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 
2012, a petition'' and inserting ``A petition''.
    (b) Director Review.--Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is amended 
by striking ``During the 5-year period beginning on the effective date 
of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, this 
paragraph'' and inserting ``This paragraph''.
    (c) Retroactive Effective Date.--The amendments made by this 
section shall take effect as if enacted on November 26, 2017.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
•

11. 11111,NOPRIREti • • r

re I... •

MORMON FOR DC FLAX

. VIA: Genera Stewart

IRMITSCT: 303 Committee/See MembershipI have been of the President and

of the

Commit

y o •

rT1VTJ:Trr!'"P have been a4ded to the 303

advised by CIA/Sacurity, that by direction

 Mo'er Presidential Assistant,

rec

ec

eiv security indoctrination into . ts.

dadtfie L 4,46-+.

4111MIEErticer

XR0 Staff

t

3

..... ••

nt•I• ri.:t 0:1-Y

.t: ‘424:attt.
Exhibit 8(a)


                                  Subsidiaries

A.   ASE Test Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
     China, which has one subsidiary:

     (i) ASE Test (U.S.A.) Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
     State of California.

B.   ASE Test Holdings Ltd, a corporation organized under the laws of the Cayman
     Islands, and its majority-owned subsidiary, ISE Labs, Inc., a corporation
     organized under the laws of the State of California, U.S.A. ISE Labs, Inc.
     has four subsidiaries:

     (i) ISE Labs Hong Kong Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
     Hong Kong S.A.R.

     (ii)ISE Labs Singapore Pte Limited, a corporation organized under the laws
     of Singapore.

     (iii) ISE Technology, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
     State of California, U.S.A.

     (iv)Digital Testing Services Inc., a corporation organized under the laws
     of the State of California, U.S.A.

C.   ASE Test Finance Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
     Mauritius; and

D.   ASE Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of
     Singapore, and its wholly owned subsidiary, ASE Electronics (M) Sdn. Bhd,
     Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Malaysia.


                                     8(a)-1
# C_2005082EN.01000902.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/9

---

Action brought on 25 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-22/05)

(2005/C 82/19)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 25 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Rozet and N. Yerrell, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by excluding persons working in fairground undertakings from the scope of national measures transposing Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, (1) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(3) and 17 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by excluding persons working in fairground undertakings from the scope of national measures transposing Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, (1) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(3) and 17 of that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The exclusion of persons working in fairground undertakings from the scope of national legislation transposing Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time is not provided for by Article 1(3) of that directive defining its scope. According to that provision, the Directive applies to all sectors of activity, with the exception of air, rail, road, sea, inland waterway and lake transport, sea fishing, other work at sea and the activities of doctors in training. The category of persons working in fairground undertakings is not referred to in that article and moreover does not satisfy the conditions of any of the derogations allowed by Article 17 of the Directive, which furthermore have not been relied on by the Belgian authorities. By introducing an exception which the Directive itself did not provide for, Belgium has incorrectly transposed that directive, thereby failing to fulfil its obligations.

---

(1)  OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p. 18

1

---
Exhibit 10.06
 TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 Agreement TeleTech   Optionee   Grant Date
 Grant of Option Plan Option  Shares Common Stock  Option Price Committee last sale price
 Code
 Term: Option Rights Expiration
Date
 Rights Upon Termination of Employment Subsidiaries Disability
 Rights Upon Termination For Cause
 Rights Upon Optionees Death or Disability
 Vesting Vesting
Date
 CumulativePercentage of
 -1-




---



##### 



Vesting Date
    
    Option Vested,
    
    
    25
    %,
    
    
    50
    %,
    
    
    75
    %,
    
    
    100
    %
  Procedure for Exercise
 Payment for Shares
 Options Not Transferable and Subject to Certain Restrictions
 Acceptance of Plan
 No Right to Employment
 Compliance with Securities Laws Securities
Act
 -2-




---



##### 



Adjustments
 No Other Rights
 Confidentiality OPTIONEE AGREES NOT TO DISCLOSE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO ANY
OTHER EMPLOYEE OF TELETECH AND TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL ALL INFORMATION RELATING TO ANY OPTIONS OR
OTHER AWARDS GRANTED TO OPTIONEE, PURSUANT TO THE PLAN OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF ANY
SUCH AWARD, THE EXERCISE PRICE AND THE RATE OF VESTING THEREOF; PROVIDED THAT OPTIONEE SHALL BE
ENTITLED TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION TO SUCH OF OPTIONEES ADVISORS, REPRESENTATIVES OR AGENTS,
OR TO SUCH OF TELETECHS OFFICERS, ADVISORS, REPRESENTATIVES OR AGENTS (INCLUDING LEGAL AND
ACCOUNTING ADVISORS), WHO HAVE A NEED TO KNOW SUCH INFORMATION FOR LEGITIMATE TAX, FINANCIAL
PLANNING OR OTHER SUCH PURPOSES
 Severability
 References
 Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 No Third Party Beneficiary
 Governing Law
 -3-




---



##### 



TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.By:John R. Troka, Jr.NameSignature of  (Optionee)Optionees Social Security Number
 -4-
••

Redacted by CP

.

.

DuLac CIA? If yes; redact (mr

•

• • . . 0: '

. . •

•

• '

wart/ me / 2

2 8 0 CT 1

. ii.tutumirunt

Reference is made to Si October letter to you,

subject: "Apney-Pereancal Office of Space Systems,

USAF. "

is not peculiar to Agency persoonaL Mace the 4M-PIROMAIII

Please be assured that the policy referred to by •

small, I personally exercise Gnat approval arstborily over aU professional sanitary and 01VMM permuted nembated for *di la the _

organisation -- whether Air Faroe, Army. likn y, MPIC. or

CIA.

Deer Dr. Wheelom

I do not agree with the last sentence in Mr.

to you. My Division Chiefs are expected to aeoe.e i initial

screening of nominees and select the one Most acceptable to them.

I reserve final approval authority for myself largely to insure a

proper balance of across the entire lfirRIE) Staff.

If necessary and/or appropriate. I shell be glad to formalise

any procedures with you re future screening of CIA nominees for

duty with the if* IMO Staff. is addition. I should like to bring up '

another personnel administrative matter.

As I understand the situatioa, past practice has been that the

Director, (S) NRO Staff, is set expected to submit (or indoroe)

performance appraisals on CIA personnel assigned to this organisation. If true, this is not an acceptable management practice to •

me. In any event. I should like to formalise some procedures In

this regard with the appropriate staff element in your headquarters.

Sincerely,

Sirmed

JAMES T. STEWART

Brigadier General, USAF

Director, 49) PIRO Staff

cc: WM.

Dr. Albert D. Wheel=

Deputy Director for UT, CIA

Washington 25, DC

Centszi S

-0 ---Copies

Yaw..

•

:oatral N 31. I'

'11
.

. •

23 October 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, CGA/DDSter: at"

SUBJECT: Agency Personnel Assigned to Office of Space Systems, USAF

During discussions I had with General Stewbrt, Director, Office

of Space Systems, on 20 October 1964, he expressed his desire to have final

review and approving authority on any agency personae' assigned to his staff.

I reviewed with the General the request i placed

to write a brief resume of the qualifications and experience he

that might be used in the position he will All here effective 9 November 1964,

his current assignment date. In /W. to arrange a personal

intervi....w between the General • ' if the General so desires. •

Iarncxpcttra final decision on .1-1-#.•"1"fi" sifter the General reviews

resume.

Because the General's request is one of personnel action I would

We to suggest procedures be established and coordinated between the two

action agencies to provide him with an automatic review in the future. I

do not feel it Is appropriate that I become involved in this area after

ippob ment bas been approved.

IJJJ (ti . •

Technical Services

Office of Space Systems

cc: General Stewart
# C_2005106EN.01000602.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/6 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 24 February 2005

in Case C-279/03: Commission of the European Communities v Implants (International) Ltd( 1 )

(Arbitration clause - Reimbursement of an advance payment - Default interest - Default proceedings)

(2005/C 106/11)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-279/03, an action under Article 238 EC brought on 26 June 2003, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Lyal and C. Giolito) v Implants (International) Ltd, established in Cleveland (United Kingdom) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Orders Implants (International) Ltd to pay to the Commission of the European Communities the principal sum due of EUR 284 000, together with default interest:
—
at the rate of 4,8 % per annum from 31 August 2002 until 31 December 2002; —
at the rate of 6,8 % per annum from 1 January 2003 until the sums payable have been reimbursed in full; | — | at the rate of 4,8 % per annum from 31 August 2002 until 31 December 2002; | — | at the rate of 6,8 % per annum from 1 January 2003 until the sums payable have been reimbursed in full; |
| -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| — | at the rate of 4,8 % per annum from 31 August 2002 until 31 December 2002; | | | | |
| — | at the rate of 6,8 % per annum from 1 January 2003 until the sums payable have been reimbursed in full; | | | | |

| 2. | Orders Implants (International) Ltd to pay the costs. |
| -- | ----------------------------------------------------- |

---

( 1 )  OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:



| |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 9, 2004



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/    Michael J. Gaughan                                           
|                                                                    
|Michael J. Gaughan Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                    
|/s/    Gage Parrish                                                 
|                                                                    
|Gage Parrish Vice President and Chief Financial Officer             



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and will be retained by Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM NEW
CENTURY ENERGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE NINE  MONTHS  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              5,422,912
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              344,630
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                   777,585
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                 519,952
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,065,079
<COMMON>                                 104,603
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>              1,327,644
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                      637,223
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>         2,069,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    139,254
<PREFERRED>                              140,002
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                   1,948,125
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        94,156
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           578,736
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>            307,530
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  2,576
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>               41,052
<LEASES-CURRENT>                           4,890
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>         1,739,288
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          7,065,079
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>              2,487,767
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      94,665
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             1,998,928
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             2,093,593
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                  394,174
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       (31,294)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>           362,880
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 178,525
<NET-INCOME>                              64,976
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                8,814
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  60,670
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                119,312
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                   201,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.62
        

</TABLE>
#### Will of Wambold: Kohler, Appellant, vs. Wollenziehn and others, Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the county court of Milwaukee county dated December 11, 1926: John C. Karel, Judge.

Will contest. Will allowed. Contestant appeals.

For the appellant: *Adolph G. S'chwefel*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Arnold Wangerin*of Milwaukee, attorney, and *Gordon I. Hansen*of Milwaukee, guardian *ad litem.*

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.