alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005057EN.01003202.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/32

---

Action brought on 13 December 2004 by Christos Michail against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-486/04)

(2005/C 57/55)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 December 2004 by Christos Michail, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by Haralambos Meidanis, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's Decisions of 20 March 2004, impliedly rejecting the application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations made by the applicant on 20 November 2003, and of 13 September 2004, rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's Decisions of 20 March 2004, impliedly rejecting the application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations made by the applicant on 20 November 2003, and of 13 September 2004, rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant;

| — | make an appropriate order as to costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an appropriate order as to costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

On 20 November 2003, the applicant, a Commission official, made an application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations alleging that he was the victim of mental harassment on the part of the administration of his institution. By his action, he seeks the annulment of the implied decision rejecting that application and the decision rejecting his complaint submitted under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations.

The applicant claims that the defendant did not take action on his complaints regarding alleged irregularities in the verification and checking of Community joint financing but, on the contrary, precisely because of his complaints, adopted an attitude designed to intimidate him and to compromise his career. In support of his action, he relies on Articles 12a, 21a, 22b and 24 of the Staff Regulations, the provisions of the Financial Regulation, the principle of sound financial management and the protection of the financial interests of the Commission, the principle of fair and equal treatment of staff and a manifest error of assessment on the part of the Commission.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plats of survey; Colorado.

      ( print page 7877)    

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

# DATES:

Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat described in this notice will happen on March 16, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The plat, in 2 sheets, and field notes of the dependent resurvey and survey in Townships 12 and 13 South, Ranges 66 and 67 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, were accepted on January 16, 2015.

Randy Bloom,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.

[FR Doc. 2015-02940 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
# FIRST
AMENDMENT TODEVON OEI
OPERATING, INC.EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL
RETIREMENT PLANMEMBERSHIP
AGREEMENT

WHEREAS,
Devon OEI Operating, Inc. (the Company) and Robert K. Reeves (the
Employee) have heretofore entered into a Membership Agreement (the
Agreement) evidencing the terms and conditions of the Employees
membership in the Devon OEI Operating, Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the
Plan); and

WHEREAS,
the Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and Employee hereby agree that, effective as of April
29, 2003, a new Section 11 is added to the Agreement to read as follows:

|1. |  | Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Agreement to the contrary,
upon Employees termination of employment with the Company and its
affiliates Employee shall receive, in lieu of an annuity under the Plan, an
amount equal to 100% of the Actuarial Equivalent (as such term is defined in the
Plan on February 23, 2003) of his then vested Accrued Benefit in a single lump
sum, which shall be paid as soon as reasonably practical after such termination.
Upon such payment, the non-vested portion, if any, of Employees Accrued
Benefit shall be forfeited and Employee shall cease to be a Member.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Employee hereby consents to the Company fully funding only the vested portion of
Employees Accrued Benefit under the Plan pursuant to Section 8.01 of the
Plan, as amended by the Third Amendment.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | As
amended hereby, the Agreement is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTED
effective this April 29, 2003.

OCEAN
ENERGY, INC.

By:__________________
  Name:________________Title:_________________

EMPLOYEE

__________________________Robert K. Reeves
#### Kielsmeier, Appellant, vs. Schaafs and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *E. C. Smith*of Appleton and *Lyman G. Wheeler*of Milwaukee.

For the' respondents Schaafs and others: *Collins & Collins*of Sheboygan.

For the respondent Madison: *Hougen & Brady*of Man-itowoc.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 4, 1929.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. DEA-392]

# ACTION:

Notice of application.

# DATES:

Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before April 13, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA                         **Federal Register**                         Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.

In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on August 12, 2014, Cambridge Isotope Lab, 50 Frontage Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of morphine (9300), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to utilize small quantities of the listed controlled substance in the preparation of analytical standards.

Dated: February 5, 2015.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2015-02820 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
## Ar**celorMittal Minorca Mine** Date Updated: 5/1/2012



### 114a BA**RT Request** Furnace Operating Parameters Flue Gas Composition, Air Flow Rate, & Pellet Residence Time 

### Flue Gas Composition **Stack Test (see Footnotes) [2]**  **[3]** CO + N 2 Volume % (dry) 79.1 79.3 79.2 CO2 Volume % (dry) 1.2 0.9 1.1 H 2O Volume % 12.3 10.2 11.3 O 2 Volume % (dry) 19.7 19.8 19.7 NO ppm-dry 111.1 111.1 NO2 ppm-dry 2.6 2.6 NOx ppm-dry 113.7 113.7 PM-Filterable gr/dscf 0.0053 0.0 PM-Condensible gr/dscf 0.0020 0.0 SO 2 ppm-dry 5.7 5.7 CO + N 2 Volume % (dry) 79.2 79.5 79.4 CO2 Volume % (dry) 1.6 1.4 1.5 H 2O Volume % 13.9 11.4 12.7 O 2 Volume % (dry) 19.2 19.1 19.2 NO ppm-dry 160.1 160.1 NO2 ppm-dry 4.3 4.3 NOx ppm-dry 164.4 164.4 PM-Filterable gr/dscf 0.0052 0.0 PM-Condensible gr/dscf 0.0022 0.0 SO 2 ppm-dry 5.6 5.6 **SV 014**

**SV 015 Stack Number**  **Parameter [1]**  **Concentration Units**  **Stack Test Average**  

### Question **2 Document 2** 
**- 1** 

CO + N 2 Volume % (dry) 79.4 79.3 79.4 CO2 Volume % (dry) 2.3 2.3 2.3 H 2O Volume % 14.0 13.1 13.6 O 2 Volume % (dry) 18.3 18.4 18.4 NO ppm-dry 248.1 248.1 NO2 ppm-dry 9.7 9.7 NOx ppm-dry 257.8 257.8 PM-Filterable gr/dscf 0.0055 0.0 PM-Condensible gr/dscf 0.0017 0.0 SO 2 ppm-dry 4.0 4.0 CO + N 2 Volume % (dry) 79.4 79.6 79.5 CO2 Volume % (dry) 2.7 2.8 2.7 H 2O Volume % 15.3 14.2 14.8 O 2 Volume % (dry) 18.0 17.6 17.8 NO ppm-dry 331.1 331.1 NO2 ppm-dry 12.6 12.6 NOx ppm-dry 343.7 343.7 PM-Filterable gr/dscf 0.0060 0.0 PM-Condensible gr/dscf 0.0017 0.0 SO 2 ppm-dry 6.7 6.7 **SV 016**

**SV 017**

## Ar**celorMittal Minorca Mine** Date Updated: 5/1/2012



### 114a BA**RT Request** Furnace Operating Parameters Flue Gas Composition, Air Flow Rate, & Pellet Residence Time 

### Question **2 Document 2** 
**- 1**  **Ai r Flow** **Rate Stack Test (see Footnotes)**  **[2] [3]**  ACFM 203,000 211,000 207,000 SCFM 172,000 178,000 175,000 DSCFM 151,000 160,000 155,500 ACFM 223,000 224,000 223,500 SCFM 186,000 190,000 188,000 DSCFM 161,000 168,000 164,500 ACFM 163,000 192,000 177,500 SCFM 137,000 162,000 149,500 DSCFM 118,000 141,000 129,500 ACFM 185,000 227,000 206,000 SCFM 155,000 187,000 171,000 DSCFM 131,000 160,000 145,500


### Pellet Residence Time **Length of Furnace [4]**  **Speed of Belt [5]** 

72 ft 8.25 ft/min


### Footnotes [1] Reported parameters are averages of the 3 runs for each stack test. **SV 015**

**Pellet Residence Time [6]**  8.7 min **SV 016**

**SV 017 Stack Number** 

[4] Length of the furnace is defined as the distance between the start of the preheat zone and the exit of the firing zone. [2] SO2Stack Test report from Barr Engineering Co. dated March 2012. NOx/N2O Stack Test report from Barr Engineering Co. Dated March 2012. Separate reports were written even though the stack tests were completed at the same time (July 19-21, 2011). [3] PM and NOx stack tests report from Barr Engineering Co. dated August 2011. Stacks tested July 12-14, 2011. **Parameter [1]**  **Stack Test Average** 
**SV 014**

[5] Speed of belt per process engineer Adam Sersha at ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine. [5] Pellet Residence Time = Length of Furnace / Speed of Belt zone.
. ' 

-~ .,. ...... """' -- Approved for Release:_ 2020/02/07 C05111682 ~l If'•;. 'i !\ :\l 

LJ: l..i.Jtil J CONTROi. !i'IS. Ullit 

).£f( NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFIS,E l,·'~7, ... WASHINGTON, o.c. 11u11111111m11m1mim111~1u111m11111111m11111u1 14 00090816D 

Of F!CE OF THE DIRECTOR June 5, 1969 

HEXAGON 

MEMORA.t""'DUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, CIA RECONNAISSANCE 

PROGRA.'\1S 

SUBJECT: Titling of HEXAGON Film 

In reference to your memorandum of May 14, 1969, 

same subject as above, I hereby approve the Office 

of Security proposal to employ the security classification of TOP SECRET and the codeword HEX in the 

optical titling by Eastman Kodak Company of each 

frame of HEXAGON film. 

h~ . 

h~ L. McLucas 

TOP SEeRET £lCLU0£0 rROM AUTOMATIC: lltCGftAOING 

DOD D1UCTIVC U00.10 DOUHOTA,_lV 

co~••o••oBYE 12897-69 

<-; .. \ . .,; ~ C ;~- l t < 

..,...,.....,...-~·=-::."J.";=---~- - ·--. -·---

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111682
# C_2005006EN.01002601.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden by order of that court of 15 October 2004 in the case of H. A. Solleveld against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — ondernemingen Amersfoort

(Case C-443/04)

(2005/C 6/49)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands Supreme Court), Third Chamber (Netherlands) of 15 October 2004 received at the Court Registry on 20 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of H. A. Solleveld against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — ondernemingen Amersfoort on the following question:

Must Article 13(A)(1)(c) of the Sixth Directive (1) be construed as meaning that exemption from VAT is conferred in respect of interventions comprising the establishment of a diagnosis, the provision of therapeutic advice and possible provision of treatment, in the framework of the diagnostic treatment described in paragraphs 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 above, even where those interventions cannot be subsumed within the exercise, by the person carrying out those interventions, of a medical or paramedical profession as defined by the Member State concerned?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 145 of 16.6.1977, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                       5,379,000
<SECURITIES>                                13,402,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,352,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 20,290,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,712,000
<PP&E>                                       3,774,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,504,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,346,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,260,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,518,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,346,000
<SALES>                                     23,542,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,542,000
<CGS>                                       18,205,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,205,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,784,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,830,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   718,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,112,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,086,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         762,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,088,452
<PP&E>                                       3,747,258
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,604,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,231,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,231,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,231,363
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               522,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   805,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005143EN.01001402.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 28 April 2005

in Case C-376/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/58/EC - Electronic communications - Processing of personal data - Protection of privacy - Protection of natural persons - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 143/20)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-376/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Shotter) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 2 September 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur) and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 April 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Kingdom of Belgium

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

1

---