alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to Capital Support Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as of the 29th day of September 2008, by and between
NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION (the “Support Provider”) and NORTHERN FUNDS (the “Trust”), on behalf of its series the Money Market Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008 and amended the
Agreement on July 15, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions
provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 1(f) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 
 (f) “Required Capital Contribution” means for the Fund on the date of any Contribution Event, a Capital Contribution in an
amount sufficient for the Fund to maintain its net asset value per share at no less than the Minimum Permissible NAV, after giving effect to the Contribution Event and all payments received by the Fund in respect of the Eligible Notes. The net asset
value for purposes of calculating the amount of Required Capital Contribution shall exclude any account receivable or other asset representing the Support Provider’s obligations under this Agreement. Minimum Permissible NAV means $0.9990.








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 2 to the Capital Support Agreement to be
executed as of the date specified above. 
  

			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	
	Attn: William R. Dodds, Jr.
	
	NORTHERN FUNDS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ITS MONEY MARKET FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lloyd A. Wennlund

	Name:	 	Lloyd A. Wennlund
	Title:	 	President
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	
	Attn: Lloyd A. Wennlund


  

 2
# C_2005005EN.01000101.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 January 2005

(2005/C 5/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3200 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4399 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0298 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5488 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2210 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58070 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,303 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6968 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4329 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0912 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 003 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,7700 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,608 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8250 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7301 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6226 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2822 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8811 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1721 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0036 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3200

JPY

Japanese yen

138,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4399

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70280

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0298

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5488

ISK

Iceland króna

83,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2210

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58070

CZK

Czech koruna

30,303

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6968

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4329

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0912

ROL

Romanian leu

39 003

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,7700

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,608

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8250

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7301

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6226

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2822

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8811

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1721

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,58

ZAR

South African rand

8,0036

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
aworamAude......

-TOP-SECREF

-151- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. O.C.

THE NRO STAFF

NOTE FOR GENERAL BRADBURN

November 28, 1972

Ale""ejed24/e

gr

/Of

SUBJECT: Comments on DOD Signals Intelligence Directive

You had two comments on the draft DOD Directive S-3115.7,

Signals Intelligence:

It makes no mention of the role of DDR&.E in management.

It discusses only collection requirements, not

analysis for the making of finished intelligence.

Here are some observations and comments. All the directives

and material I refer to are in the attached folder.

The directives which existed prior to the reorganization

of NSA and the creation of the CSS provided for significant involvement of DDR&E in several phases of the signal intelligence

business at NSA. DOD Directive S-3115.2, February 7, 1967,

treated this in paragraphs III.C.13, 14, 15. DOD Directive

S-3115.4, March 19, 1959, discussed it in paragraph IV.B.l.f.

The NSA/CSS Organization Plan, dated February 28, 1972,

and approved April 14, 1972, hardly mentions DDR6E. The only

specific references I can find are "DDR&E supplies guidance on

research soundness and technical balance:' and "The Military

Departments, ASD(I), and DDR&E take part in planning, programming and budgeting actions. The program is reviewed by both

DDR&E and ASD(I) before submission to the Secretary of Defense."

While these are minimal remarks, they should be enough to

justify inclusion of DDR&E in the Signals Intelligence Directive.

-TOP-SECRET--

WCWW8 11160 •WOINAtit K.N.M.

INeeenve WM IS sus NW Wilir

COMMw Tnternal

WW W 01640
4014ECKT- MEI

On your second point, I was surprised to learn that neither

NSA nor CSS is even permitted to produce finished intelligence!

NSCID 6 says "It is the intent of this Directive that the

National Security Agency not engage in the production and dissemination of finished intelligence, but .be limited to the production

and dissemination. of COMINT and ELINT." The implementing directive,

DOD Directive S-5100.20 goes one step further; Paragraph VI. A. 6

says "Produce and disseminate SIGINT in accordance with the

objectives, requirements and priorities established by the Director

of Central Intelligence (this function will not include the production and dissemination of finished intelligence which are the

responsibilities of the Departments and Agencies other than the

National SeCurity Agency/Central Security Service)."

FREDERICK L. HOFMANN

Lt Colonel, USAF

)14- e )40,,a a la- ). ‘App.eviei. -pp.€ 6(

AFII i

‘ t- tzti4 71"A

P7-,ie

62ete‹, sir le-444-”-4:9tia

g4.

/24

ocimoctAt'

.4vAk 744.44.

„,,A/voiLsie

I ItC1.11163 TOON 1111104Wit Itt611/110411

Oft 'ACC 1.% HMI II Oen NW 6000

MIMS' NO Internal

op t oT amts

--2-- .aegis
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2196 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to disclose 

information to certain recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. CUMMINGS, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers 

to disclose information to certain recipients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLO4 SURES. 

5 Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘or to the Inspector’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘such disclosures’’ and inserting ‘‘the In8 spector General of an agency, a supervisor in the employ9 ee’s direct chain of command up to and including the head 

10 of the employing agency, the Director of National IntelVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:16 May 02, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2196.IH H2196

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2196 IH

1 ligence, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Commu2 nity, or to an employee designated by any of the aforemen3 tioned individuals for the purpose of receiving such disclo4 sures’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005106EN.01001203.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/12

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 28 January 2005

in Case C-208/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État in Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL v Région wallonne (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Concept of waste - List of materials that are equatable with products)

(2005/C 106/24)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-208/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Conseil d'État (Council of State, Belgium), made by decision of 29 April 2004, received at the Court on 11 May 2004, in the proceedings between Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Région wallonne — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, P. Kūris (Rapporteur) and J. Klučka, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 28 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL

Région wallonne

| | Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, precludes the introduction by States of a new category of materials which do not come under either the category of waste or that of products even though that new category of materials may contain substances or objects liable to meet the definition of ‘waste’ within the meaning of that provision. |
| --- | --- |

Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, precludes the introduction by States of a new category of materials which do not come under either the category of waste or that of products even though that new category of materials may contain substances or objects liable to meet the definition of ‘waste’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.

1

---
MAYDLP VIA

--TRENHEYHOLECUM T PIOL SYSTEM

,Ast NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.0

9 December 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. LATIMER, OSD

Immilimpousz

SUBJECT: Organization and Management of the

Foreign Intelligence Community

Here are my thoughts relative to the proposed options for

intelligence community leadership. I favor a blend of Options 3

and 4 in order to protect the streamlined management and decision

making capabilities of the NRO to administer the NRP.

There needs to be a single source of long-range requirements to the NRO in order to accommodate both the "national"

and "tactical" needs. A mechanism similar to the USIB should be

retained for this purpose. It should be representative of the

national and tactical interests. Inputs of requirements from many

sources in the absence of a central mechanism would likely fractionalize the adjudication process and create unnecessary ambiguity.

- There needs to be a single set of priorities for

satellite tasking during peace or crisis situations. This is

presently handled by the COMIRWICRS or the SIGINT/SORS Committees.

The mechanism for establishing priorities should be representative

of both national and tactical interests. Proper operational control of the satellite systems is more a function of priority establishment than a function of ownership. Ownership is a function of

specialized contracting employed by the NRO.

There needs to be a central resource allocating body

for the NRO similar to the present ExCom. A high-level representation is required for facilitating an unambiguous decision process

which establishes a clearly defined level of effort.

The DNRO should be directly responsible to the

Secretary or Deputy Secretary for the operation of the program

and the expenditure of resources. The NRP should not be competitive for other Defense resources once an appropriate level

of effort is established.

A non-advocacy technical relationship should be established with the Congress in support of the DGI in order to explain

the basis of funding required for satellite system development.

WNW

warms m __fix

I HANDLE VIA muse essreiiess. settraTealIs.

.1.1111141P we 0•11010. 4 INNINS Miami

OSHMONsC••••••• •• WI •• .0 4. .•• al

1 ••••••••11.4•6••••••••••111111111..

I

two...••••••••••••• .

CON •6401.. S ,STe ll•I

"...".".."4/•••••• 0,011•••• ....f.

•

townie,. NoZS':12fiti-A

tomv_i_ow COPtES

PAGE OS PAGES
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                           Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.
                      Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005



-    Caliper Life Sciences Europe, incorporated in Belgium (wholly owned
     subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Caliper Life Sciences Benelux NV, incorporated in Belgium (wholly owned
     subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences Europe)

-    Caliper Life Sciences S.A., incorporated in France (wholly owned subsidiary
     of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Caliper Life Sciences GmbH, incorporated in Germany (wholly owned
     subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Caliper Life Sciences AG, incorporated in Switzerland (wholly owned
     subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Caliper Life Sciences Ltd., incorporated in the United Kingdom (wholly
     owned subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Caliper Life Sciences Ltd., incorporated in Canada (wholly owned subsidiary
     of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    NovaScreen Biosciences Corporation, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned
     subsidiary of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.)

-    Marizyme Corporation, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned subsidiary of
     NovaScreen Biosciences Corporation)

-    Oceanix Biosciences Company, incorporated in Delaware (wholly owned
     subsidiary of NovaScreen Biosciences Corporation)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2258 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require that certain standards for commercial driver's licenses 
  applicable to former members of the armed services or reserves also 
      apply to current members of the armed services or reserves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Active Duty Voluntary Acquisition of 
Necessary Credentials for Employment Act'' or the ``ADVANCE Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS FOR SERVICE MEMBERS AND 
              VETERANS.

    Section 31305(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Veteran 
        Operators'' and inserting ``Service Members, Reservists, and 
        Veterans'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``subparagraph (A) 
        during'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A)--
                            ``(i) while serving in the armed forces or 
                        reserve components; and
                            ``(ii) during''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ``current or'' before 
        ``former'' each place the term appears.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require that certain standards for commercial driver's licenses 
  applicable to former members of the armed services or reserves also 
      apply to current members of the armed services or reserves.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    dec-31-1996

<CASH>                                         4,006,450
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,004,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,542,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,983,118
<PP&E>                                         2,348,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,091,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,655,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,578,152
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,209
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,693,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,655,062
<SALES>                                        22,836,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,836,088
<CGS>                                          21,428,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,689,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (77,943)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,337,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,337,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,337,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.32)
        


</TABLE>
#### Anonymous.

Whore the act of limitations begins to run against *a feme sole,*her marrying will not suspend iis operation.

This was a special verdict, in which the question was. stated to be, whether *a. feme sole,*against whom the act of limitations had begun to run, could by marrying, suspend the operation thereof, or whether it would rim on, notwithstanding the coverture.

*Per curiam*

WiiiMAm and Haywoob.

This is a plain question : it is clear law. when the act once begins to run, no incapacity to sue, as coverture or the like^ intervening before the three years are completed, will prevent its running on so as to form a bar.

*Mr. Moore*however, urged that there never had been any decision in any court to that effect, either in England or here. He said such an opinion was intimated at Wilmington, at the last term, by Judge Haywoob, alone on the bench. That he had heard of such a doctrine before, at the time *Mr. Iredell*was at the bar, and had been furnished by him with a list of authorities upon which *Mr. Iredell*had formed such an opinion; but upon examining them attentively, they are found to be *dictums,*grounded on the case of *Touch &*— —Plowden. 368 — which was a case adjudged upon the statute of fines.

Judge Haywoob — After the. opinion I gave at Wilmington, last spring, I searched the authorities when I went home with great diligence — many of the instances are but *dictums,*hut every where it seems to be held as law, and not to be disputed where the point occurs. It is so held in 4 *Term Rep.*310 — and 306, in the notes. *Wils.*134, was decided upon that principle, and 1 *Strange*556. I am very sure that the law is so, but let the case lie over till to-morrow, that *Mr. Moore*may have time to look into authorities. Judge Wiimams assented.

Next morning, the court having looked into authorities, mentioned the case again, and asked the counsel wheiher they would argue it; and they declining an argument, the court gave judgment for the Defendant.

Note.— *Vide Andrews*v. Mulford the cases referred to in the note *ante*311.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  annual  report of The Berkshire Collection, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandy
Winick,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 11, 2005                           /s/  Sandy  Winick
                                                  -------------
                                                  Sandy  Winick,
                                                  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                                  The Berkshire Collection, Inc.

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 15, 2005
                                           /s/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                              Claudia M. Pieropan
                                              Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
                                              and Treasurer (Principal Financial
                                              and Accounting Officer)