alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2014

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Upland Wildlife 

Management (645)

I.6 (+/-) Habitat quality for 

non-target wildlife

I.5 (+) Target species 

habitat quality

D.3 (+) Temporary 

vegetative and soil 

disturbance at the location 

of structure

Initial setting: All land uses where a limiting habitat 

factor for wildlife has been identified as the lack of 

suitable loafing, escape, nesting, rearing, roosting, 

perching or basking cover. Additionally, when existing 

artificial conservation structures provide a risk of injury or 

mortality to wildlife, and modifications of such structures 

can be made to mitigate the risks.

Artificial wildlife habitat structures (e.g. 

nesting boxes, perching structures, fence 

markers, escape ramps)

Start

Brush piles, rock piles, or earthen 

nesting islands

I.1 (+/-) 

Predation 

Cover Crop (340)

Structures for Wildlife (649)

((649)

C.1 (+) Target species local 

populations

C.2 (+/-) Non-target 

species local 

populations

C.4 (-) Soil Health

D.1 (-) Injury D.2 (+) Nesting and 

other cover

I.2 (+) 

Reproduction

I.3 (+) Movement and access I.4 (+/-) Disease

Wetland Wildlife 

Management (644)

Access Road (560)

C.3 (+/-) Water 

quality

I.7 (-) Erosion

I.8 (-) Sedimentation
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 South Carolina - Fiscal Year 2024
---, .. ,;.._, "-'-'-~.-.-.' -----)Op. SEaHEl. =~t~~-'~fl1it1 i~;i 

tlANDllNG .r-- , .'I!'t;uu. HA!4DUNG'" .' _ ! 

.: :.. . • . . D~aUR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGlMa41dG . .~. . .' t 

~.'II"PJ1: NRO APP~OVED' ~OR RELEASE· WAlliINGTON II. D. C. ...... .. :': ' .. " ; i ~~~ DECLASSIFIED BY: C/fART' .... '. . .' :.:.' " .. " ~; ~\ ~ • DECLASSIFIED ON: 1 OCTOBER 2012 . .,: .': ...... ... , •.. r;. .., ... ' . . .' U 

'<. .. .SAPSS· ... '. i . '. .' ': .. , . 31 ')da 1963 .'. . ... :.:.. .. ,' l! 

. t .. . t . . ', 

.. ,.' '.' ·.i· :. . '.' .: .... ;.~. .. MEMORANDUM FOR ltECOlU) . .. ~ :":'. ." :.' . , . 

SUBJECT: Covert Sate11i~s 

. ,'. ." . =,., " ,,' "'" . . "!: .... 

.', . 

.' 

",.,'; . . " .. : \ , ... ' I 

Reference: J?D(R"IS) Memo f~r Record" ·dtcl 29 May' 63 (B-67Z4-6~~~.: .',:' ;~ .. -:.,:.:,-:~ ':". ~ 

:~: ,:' ., On the basis of !urtheF ~scu88ions on the above Subj~C~ ··:}~f:~l.:'?~'{:·~::.'; I 

' .. 

, . ,. ~. :: : referenced in the Memorandum £01' Record of 29 May 196,3, it " ~: ..... ", .:" ~,\".,,' . . i 

appears that Dr: ~covUlels statem~nt o£ a 5412 assigmnent may . ::;::.~ .. :.",.:,.'.:: .... ~.:.':'.'.".~::.,'.' :" . ." .: ' . . . .' . . . have been over8ta~ed by him. However, apparently 9n the basis .' . . . :' .' '.' . ~ . " . of an understanding reached between Mr. GUpatric, Mr. McCone,.. :·;.7<{ .. ~: ... ::- . -.' .,' 

.' .... ::~;. '. Dr_.ar k and Dr. Scovllle during a FY 64 NRO budget review, ":~': .:':.>., .. ~ '," 

, .'. :<. '. the budget item covering co.ver.t satellites 'is interp'ret«!~ :~; .... ~ .. :." . .-:. ';. : . 

. . :. ' : . as e g a8S gned.to the CIA for explOitation; CIA expec~8 to run.' ,;. '. ":':' ,.:".~ .. : ", . " .. \ .... the program when it is established but stm keep it within NllO. . .. ::.; .•.... :.: ..... ::. '. ' ..... 

. '.,': : .. ~ .' .. :.,' Initial CIA actipn has been additional study by 'Kelly J ohn.on of ~. . ..... :~.~::. 7:::" \.:; .... '. ~., ~ . 

'. . .-: ..... \;. '. the p08 8ibUitie s lor a covert satellite. ·The CIA' expects to re~rt'" ~ ,.:.'; ~/: ." . '.' .' :.! ; , .' .. .... :.. . ... ' .. on the result. at the forthcoming ·Purcell ;Panel meeUng. Whether:::;:.·':;;:· ... ·· ... ~ ..... 

· . ',:; .... : any 8ubsequent actions ma.y be taken by the CIA. to lo:rmally briJ;l,::~" . 

· _ '. /: ••. f ~". the matter' to, th4' 5412 Group' •. attention lor ebdoraement ia .not :j'':'' . .' ... 

',:,::" '. 0."':::.:·::··:·:':,;:,:t:::,~/:),,:,;',:.',~:·d:,; .• · ... :: .. ;,:,'~:-" . ' .. ", '::":::f:~:~::F: .: . 'TcA ~ ~ •• ::.: ••• : ... : ••.• :.~; • . ....... ; ..• ~f. • '.' .... • .••• " ' ... .. 

.. ' .. ,' ''':'j'; .>;:':',,' 1~.i5ss~-l~~~ 

'. . ' ... '., "':)J;,;:, :~i:S~J":;:.~~-,, . ' . • I ,', 

: .,:. .~. " ~ .. . 

,-' ~:~. '.'~ .' 

. : .. : ~ '.: ". 

· '. ~. ~'-.: ... ~ 

• :"' •. '.: ,:,0 . ~" . ... '. ~ 

, J ,::~/ :~~/<-'::~ .. • ' ••.••. : t' 

. '.' ::. . '. Copy furnished: 

:.: . . Sec Def 

I 

.. , .. : . . ...... 

.~. ": .. : 

... ' ... ~ ~/ 

',' 

. Dep Sec Dol 

' .. ' . Dir, NRO '/.' 

; ,., ,"". "'J.' 

SPECiAL HANDUNG 0' .. • ,'. . " .. ' .. 

'. I 

. : .... ',: ,". , .... "0 ~. \
# SkyRecon365

Mission Checklists

Arrival Checklist

1. If day and operating out of back of

vehicle, point vehicle into sun.

2. Remove case and place on level surface.

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or

controlled airspace using smartphone or

tablet app.

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver,

to contact tower of field if closer than 5

NM.

5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location,

and max height of flight.

Preflight Checklist

1. Remove transmitter.

2. Router - On

3. Transmitter - On

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up

5. Video Monitor - On

6. Remove UAS from case.

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. Micro-SD card - Inserted.

9. UAS Battery - Inserted

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and

recovery position if it returns to home.

11. UAS Battery - On

12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

13. DJI Application - Load

14. DJI application - Connect to Camera

15. SD Card - Format

16. Camera - Full Up

17. Satellite Connections - Verified

18. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight

19. Video Recording - Start

20. Takeoff After Takeoff Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the

ground to confirm UAS is under control.

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover

- Verified

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up

2. Video Recorder - Stop

3. Landing Zone - Clear / Safe

Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to

Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera

4. Takeoff

End of Ops Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
F. Robert Naka

ifs S

-4St-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

. .

.'•

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

mussimmigun

November 10, 1971

MEMRANDUM FOR RADM JAMES C. DONALDSON, JRC

SUBJECT: Emergency Recovery of National Reconnaissance

Program Satellite Re-entry Vehicles

I am concerned that we are vulnerable to the possibility

of losing a re-entry vehicle which has to be brought down

under an emergency and lands outside the area covered by our

dedicated recovery units.

Therefore, I feel that it is necessary to have procedures

available which would permit rapid collection and assessment

of information and deployment of JCS directed assets to an

emergency landing area when requested.

The NRO Satellite Contingency Plan presently covers

re-entry over land areas; the plan envisioned here would

cover re-entry primarily over the ocean areas of the world.

My Staff has prepared suggested procedures as a point

of departure • . The NRO contact for

this effort i He will be pleased to

work with you, s a al information as required

in the preparation of JCS procedures to carry out this

contingency mission.
TableofContentsAdhesivesandSealantsTestMethodsDoc.Page#sSCAQMDMethod304-91DeterminationofVolatileOrganicCompoundsinVariousMaterials(RevisedFebruary1996)1-4ASTMDesignation:ASTMD4457-85(Reapproved1996)StandardTestMethodforDeterminationofDichloromethaneand1,1,1-TrichloroethaneinPaintsandCoatingsbyDirectInjectionintoaGasChromatograph1-4ASTMDesignation:ASTME260-91StandardPracticeforGasColumnChromatography1-17ASTMDesignation:ASTME260-96(Reapproved2006)StandardPracticeforGasColumnChromatography1-17ASTMDesignation:ASTMD3792-79StandardTestMethodforWaterContentofCoatingsbyDirectInjectionIntoaGasChromatograph1-5ASTMDesignation:ASTMD3792-86StandardTestMethodforWaterContentofCoatingsbyDirectInjectionIntoaGasChromatograph1-5ASTMDesignation:ASTMD2879-86StandardTestMethodforVaporPressure-TemperatureRelationshipandInitialDecompositionTemperatureofLiquidsbyIsoteniscope1-9CAREMethod100ProceduresforContinuousGaseousEmissionStackSampling(AmendedJuly28,1997)1-14SCAQMD“GeneralTestMethodforDeterminingSolventLossesfromSprayGunCleaningSystems,”datedOctober3,19891-25SCAQMDMethod316A-92DeterminationofVolatileOrganicCompoundsinMaterialsUsedforPipesandFittings(RevisedOctober1996)1-7
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) or


RULE
15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Floyd
Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002:





(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
10, 2010





/s/ Floyd WarkolFloyd
      WarkolChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 33.1


CERTIFICATION REPORT





Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.





Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.











Date: April 16, 2012                                                            By:/s/ Stephen T. Chen


Stephen T. Chen


Chairman, Chief Executive Officer





Date: April 16, 2012                                                            By:/s/ Bernard Cohen


Bernard Cohen


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2 9 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk July 2 9 , 2016

15 4 0 62 ( 52 ) (53)

MENARD, INC.

, P etitioner

- Appell ant

, SC: 15 40 62

v COA: 3 25718

Tax Tribunal : 00

- 441600,

14

- 001918

- TT

CITY OF ESCANABA

, Respondent

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion s of respondent

- appellee for immediate

consideration and to extend the time for filing i t s answer to the application for leave to

appeal are GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or

before August 18 , 2016

.
EXHIBIT 10.5



                                LEASE EXTENSION
                                ---------------


     JH Kelly LLC (and assignee Fatum LLC) and Profile Technologies Inc. are
parties to that certain Standard Industrial Lease dated January 26, 2001 (the
"Lease"). The Lease terminates on January 31, 2003, and the parties desire to
extend the terms of said Lease for additional one year period. Accordingly,
Article 3.1 of the Lease shall be amended to reflect a term expiration date of
January 31, 2004, and shall automatically renew thereafter for one-year terms.
All other Lease terms and conditions shall continue to apply. The above
notwithstanding, beginning on October 31, 2003, either party may terminate the
Lease, or any renewals thereof, upon 90 days written notice to the other party.


Date:  February 26, 2003                    Date:  February 24, 2003


Profile Technologies Inc.                   JH Kelly LLC, on behalf of Fatum LLC


By: /s/ Philip L. Jones                     /s/ Mark Fleischauer
-----------------------                     --------------------
Its:  Executive Vice President              Mark Fleischauer, Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Point.360 ( the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the  period  ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/  Alan R. Steel
------------------------------
Alan R. Steel
Chief Financial Officer

March 11, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

                                                                                        Exhibit 23.1

                                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8
(files  no.  333-14741,   333-31521,  333-66219,  333-83645,  333-93141,  333-43034,  333-56730  and
333-72980)  of eXcelon  Corporation  of our reports  dated March 29, 2002  relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 1, 2002
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No
. FAA
- 2012
- 0216 Directorate ID : 2010
- SW
- 025
- AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S
- 92A Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 20 Helicopters in the US Re gistry. Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a loose or missing fastener, a crack, damage, or corrosion on the tail rotor (T/R) pylon and, if present, to repair the T/R Pylon and install a doubler on the aft shear deck tunnel assembly or t o replace the T/R pylon and install the doubler on the aft shear deck tunnel assembly to prevent failure of the T/R pylon or other T/R components, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 339,080 Labor per Helicopte r ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work
-hour for the inspection) (120 x $85/work
-hour for replacing the T/R pylon and installing the doubler) $ 85 per cycle $10,200 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 356,505 assuming 85 inspections per year are performed and assuming replacement of the T/R pylon and installation of the doubler Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Nicholas Faust
# CA2005088DE.01000201.xml

| 12.4.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 88/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 88/2

---

EIGNUNGSLISTE

EIGNUNGSLISTE

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/B/11/03

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/B/11/03

(2005/C 88 A/02)

VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTORINNEN/VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTOREN (B 5/B 4)

VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTORINNEN/VERWALTUNGSINSPEKTOREN (B 5/B 4)

(deutscher Sprache)

für den Bereich „Koordinierung der Produktion“

für den Bereich „Koordinierung der Produktion“

FEHRINGER Karin

HOFMANN Klaus

HOLLER Ursula

JIRSCHIK Andreas

LUDWIG Steffen

MILEWSKI Bettina

PUNDEL Andrée

SCHENK Dagmar

SCHMIDT Johanna

STENGEL Thomas

für den Bereich „Korrekturlesen“

für den Bereich „Korrekturlesen“

BAUCHHENSS Wolfgang

BUGGEL-ASMUS Birgit

FISCHER Axel

HEILEMANN Stefanie

JOHAM-ALLEN Sabine

KALTENBACH Ingrid

KLAUSS Martin

KRÜGER Andrea

LEUBNER Barbara

SCHMIDT Susanne

SEIFFERT Holger

SOMMER Reet

SPRINGER Carsten

TRUPPNER Michael

VALENTIN Christine

VOTSOS Theodoros

---
~.,.", ..... ~. "." p" ' ......... _ ,_. ',f" ,-~~.'.-.• ~ --•• ' • :: , 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART ' 

DEC,LASSIFIEDON: 1 OCTOBER 2012 

.. DIRECTOR OF DEfENSE ,RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING 

WASHINGTON 21, D.C. 

#." ': '. :" 

29 1'./.&&1 19'63 

'.' 8'1~ 7(,':J1.(,.~ ' . 

. " : : '. "'~ , ~ 

,". ',' 

. ' 

~.,t:::~ .. ~On.ANDU~1 Foa R.ECORD 

SUBJECT: Meeting '\vith Dr. ScovU1G .. 

In. aco:tVoroo.tio:l v/ith Dr. Iio;:bQ::~ ScovUlc. DD,I'iil.O, 

Dr. Sco ... -Ulo cOn"'.rAcntod to theof£cct th~t i: \":!/au his ~d tho . .. i 

CI1~'o belio! a41d t4"ldc:."ci::lndhlg tll~t tbo 541~ a.-oup bad aGsicned,! .. " 

to the CIA'the rOell0tlGlbUity for the ccvo!opmcnt of a It truly" , , . ~ : ... 

covert catcllite. dific~en~ f~·om the Na.vy P~Ollosol under ,con-: ',: .... : 

Gidor~t1on ~t ona timc. .' ""'\ . 

Co?y fU.-;'lichc,d: 

. Sec Do! 

:Cop Sec De! . 

Dir. N~?<---<~~' 

.. ' "," , 

o· " 

. .

.. , .. 

'-~ .... 

' .. ' 

'. '\ 

EugQna ; ~'. ' Fubini 

Deputy irect0:t:. . 

(Roaoa.:rc.'l &: Information Syotems) 

. ;,' 

... " ," '. 

'. 

. ~ .. 

. ,' . . 

. . 

, . 

',. " 

" ." . -

, . 

, .. ' . 

. .' 

..•... , . ... .. - . 

' . 

" 

., . 

~ , 

.J 

#I ...• 

",4 •
#### Dollhausen, Appellant, vs. Femrite, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Riley & Ohm*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toe-baas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
or as I could not

him that no landing rights in

therefore, the U-2 would not

inform General Wickham for Dr. Schle

times of the two U-2s and the suppopek

passed any additional information ava

planned deployment.

Ordinarily, the Deputy Secretary of Defense and you sign

off on a black book approving such a deployment. However, in

the past this has been circumvented if the Secretary of the

40 Committee, representing the President, gave orders to deploy.

This is the case that in fact prevailed in this instance. An

additional anomaly is that the aircraft officially deployed

under the SCOPE SAINT practice t lan particularly to

facilitate landing approvals in s deployment had

already been approved through n . It was planned

that if deployments to the Middle East were ordered or requested,

a black book would be circulated in the normal fashion whether

it was before the fact in the case of a request or after the

fact in the case of a directive.

On three occasions, within a few minutes after the actions

were decided, I personally contacted Brig. General Wickham with

information relative to the deployment. The first ca

f the departure time of the first U-2 fo

e second occasion resulted in my talking

eral Wickham, I apprised

been approved and,

third contact was to

e departure

each case, I

tive to the

I WI HAMM. I

IS)-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR October 12, 1973

11111111111019MUI

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: Intelligence Breakfast of Friday, October 12

It was reported that at the subject meeting Dr. Schlesinger

concern that the Agency U-2s had been deployed to

for to any approval by his office. He said that he

en notified of the action until it was completed and

that he would assure that it did not happen again. He further

expressed the opinion that it was the wrong kind of equipment

and it was my interpretation of his remarks that he meant that

SIGINT gear should have been sent.

IDEALIST

OM 0111CLAINPY INP DST.

ei R: leFSEREF—

TROL

CONTROL NO

COPY OF copies

PAGE OF PACES

•

•
111. uIbRil

After being informed of Dr. Schlesinger's statements, I

checked with General Wickham who assured me that Dr. Schlesinger

had been informed. I further checked with Dr. Schlesinger's

secretary, Evelyn, to insure that correspondence did not go

out of the office with such statements in it unless it was

assured that it was Dr. Schlesinger's intention to do so in

spite of the information that was available in his office.

•

CUSDITSAL 111111111t01 INS ! 1[9pSECIET- IUISCUTIVII

way III2 0.041:111111rt ON IM PET.

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPSE f

PAGE OF pkaat
Order entered November 29, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00960-CR

MARCOS EVANGELISTO ESCOBAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-00354-W

ORDER

The reporter’s record is currently due December 1, 2017. Before the Court is court 

reporter Patricia Holt’s November 21, 2017 request for additional time to file the reporter’s 

record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record due on or before January 2, 

2018. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE