alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 2023

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Terrace (Code 600) 

An earth embankment or a combination ridge and channel,

constructed across the field slope. 

Practice Information 

This practice generally applies to cropland, but may also be

used on other areas where field crops are grown, such as

wildlife or recreation lands. 

Terraces can be installed to reduce the slope length for

erosion control, intercept and conduct runoff to a safe outlet, trap sediment, retain runoff for moisture

conservation, prevent gully development, and alter the land surface to improve farmability. 

A variety of terrace configurations have been developed as a result of research and field experience.

Four common types of terrace include— 

• Broad-based—farmed on both sides and used on more uniform gently sloping fields; 

• Steep backslope—a steep downstream slope in permanent cover; 

• Narrow-based—steep on both sides and have permanent cover planted on both sides; and 

• Flat channel or level—used to conserve moisture as well as control erosion. 

Terraces require careful design, layout, and construction to provide erosion control while maintaining

farmability. Terraces may be parallel on uniform terrain or vary from parallel when the terrain is

undulating. Since parallel terraces are usually preferred, designs often provide for cuts and fills to

improve terrace alignment. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 10 years. The operation and maintenance plan includes

inspection and repair of the terraces and outlets, maintenance of terrace height and vegetation, and

removal of accumulated sediment. Inspections are performed periodically and after major storm

events. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Concervation Practice Standard (CPS) Terrace (Code 600) must have a safe outlet to convey

the runoff water to a point where it will not cause damage. Commonly associated conservation

practices include NRCS CPSs Grassed Waterway (Code 412) and Underground Outlet (Code 620).

Vegetation, if necessary, is applied according to NRCS CPS Critical Area Planting (Code 342). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2005115EN.01004002.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/40

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-122/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/71)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 9 February 2005, the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-122/03, AGA AB v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 171 of 19.7.2003.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.21



March 16, 1998

Dr. Paul R. Low
PRL Associates
11 Birchwood Drive
Greenwich, CT  06831

Dear Paul:

In view of the expanded responsibilities attendant on your recent appointment as
Chairman of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Xionics Document
Technologies, Inc., I have been authorized by the Compensation Committee of the
Board to offer you the following compensation in addition to the standard
outside directors' compensation for which you are already eligible.

(1)  Compensation for up to two days of on-site services per month at the rate
     of $1,000.00 per day.

(2)  A grant of 20,000 stock options, over and above those granted to you under
     the Xionics Directors' Stock Option Plan, to be made effective upon your
     acceptance of this letter. Such options will be issued under the 1996
     Employee Stock Option Plan and will have an exercise price equal to the
     closing price on NASDAQ of Xionics' stock on the date of grant; will vest
     in 16 equal quarterly installments beginning on April 1, 1998; and will be
     nonqualified stock options for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code.

(3)  Reimbursement of your out-of-pocket travel expenses connected with your
     performance of services for Xionics.

Paul, if the foregoing is acceptable, please so indicate by signing both copies
of this letter in the space provided below and return one to me, keeping the
other for your records. I look forward to continuing to work with you.

Sincerely,
XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

/s/ PETER J. SIMONE

Peter J. Simone
President and Chief Executive Officer

Accepted:

/s/ PAUL R. LOW                              Date:  March 16, 1998    
--------------------------------                  --------------------------
Paul R. Low
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,362
<INVENTORY>                                     35,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,410
<PP&E>                                          39,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,661
<BONDS>                                         10,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           201
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,106
<SALES>                                        126,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,936
<CGS>                                           62,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (412)
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>
Order entered September 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00079-CV

EDDIE & SHIRLEY JONES AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants

V.

HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-06600-A

ORDER

Because the reporter’s record was filed August 5, 2014, we VACATE our May 2, 2014 

order submitting the appeal without the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record is considered 

duly filed as of August 5, 2014. 

Appellants’ brief remains due September 10, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT-10.3.1


South Bay Commercial Banking Office #1487
101 Park Center Plaza
San Jose, CA 95113

April 26, 2001

Peter Eidelman, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer
Sunrise Telecom, Inc.
22 Great Oaks Boulevard
San Jose, CA 95119

Dear Mr. Eidelman:

Bank of America, N.A. has extended the availability period for your line of
credit documented by the Business Loan Agreement dated May 22, 2000, (including
any previous amendments, the "Agreement"). The availability period shall now
expire on August 1, 2001.

This extension shall not constitute a commitment to extend the availability
period beyond the case specified above. All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Please feel free to call me at (408) 277-7063 if you have any questions.



Bank of America, N.A.

/s/ Lakshmi Wolterding
------------------------------
By:    Lakshmi Wolterding
Title: Vice President
Option One Mortgage Corporation
                       2020 East First Street, Suite 120
                              Santa Ana, CA 92799


The Chase Manhattan Bank
Corporate Trust Administration
450 West 33rd Street, 15th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Attention:  Structured Finance Services (MBS)
                  (Option One/CTS Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 1996-1)
                  Inv#476

MBIA Insurance Corporation
113 King Street
Armonk, New York  10504
Attention:  Insured Portfolio Management Group-SF
                 (Option One/CTS Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 1996-1)


ContiTrade  Services  L.L.C.
277 Park  Avenue
38th Floor
New York, New York 10172
Attention:  Accounting

ContiSecurities Asset Funding Corporation
277 Park Avenue
38th Floor
New York, New York 10172
Attention: Accounting

Moody's Investors Service
99 Church Street
New York, New York 10007
Attention: The Home Equity Monitoring Department


Standard & Poor's, a division of the McGraw Hill Companies
26 Broadway
15th Floor
New York, New York 10007


Pursuant  to Section  8.16 of the  Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,  dated and
effective as of March 28, 1995, (the "Agreement")  among  ContiSecurities  Asset
Funding Corporation,  as Depositor, Option One Mortgage Corporation as Servicer,
ContiTrade  Services  L.L.C.,  as the Company,  and Chemical Bank as Trustee,  I
certify that:




1. A review of the  activities  of the  Master  Servicer  during  the year ended
December 31, 1996, and of  performance  under the  aforementioned  agreement has
been made under my supervision.


2. To the best of my knowledge,  based on such review,  the Master  Servicer has
fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under the  Agreement  during  the year ended
December 31, 1996, subject to any matters noted in the servicing report provided
under Section 8.17 of the Agreement.



/s/ William L. O'Neill
----------------------
William   L.  O'Neill
Senior Vice President \ Chief  Financial Officer
Option One  Mortgage Corporation
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 30 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID NOLLMEYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DELAWARE STATE POLICE, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-2306 (D.C. No. CIV-95-1319-MV/DJS)

(D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY and HENRY , Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Nollmeyer, appearing pro se and in forma pauper is, appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his ci vil rights action against the United States for failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and against the Delaware State Police for lack of personal jurisdic tion, Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(2). We construe Mr. Nollmeyer’s docketing statement filed in this court on September 23,1997, as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal from the district court’s

order of April 14, 1997 dismissing the action and the September 2, 1997 denial of post-judgment motions. See Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1); 4(a)(4)(C). We have reviewed the record and affirm for substantially the same reasons relied upon by the m agistrate judge, although we remand for the district court to enter judgment dis missing without prejudice the claims against the Delaware State Police, as these claims were dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Madara v. Hall , 916 F.2d 1510, 1514 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1990). To the extent Mr. Nollmeyer raises new issu es in his appeal not addressed below, we deem them waived and do not address them. See Sac & Fox Nation v. Hanson , 47 F.3d 1061, 1063 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 810 (1995). We construe Mr. Nollmeyer’s continued filings with thi s court as motions to file supplemental briefs and deny them. AFFIRMED and REMANDED. Entered for the Court

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and
the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the
Report):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ Gary C. Kaufman
     Name: Gary C. Kaufman
     Date: November 14, 2003
TOP SECRET "4111414aNd

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. •

TOP SECRET ammo amaaft mosems

IMOUTIVII WS tip mess Ile, 60011, frillef/l0fArIL *aim

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PACKARD

SUBJECT: Letter to Ambassador Johnsirn on "Fact Of"

To the right is a follow-up to the ExCom discussion

on "fact of." I think that your signature is desirable

in speaking for the ExCom. The SALT ratification question

is expected to be reviewed by the NSAM 156 Committee

beginning this month.

John L. McLucas
annew Internal

COPT M fAhltS

TOP SECRET

ISI NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C.

THE NRO STAFF

•

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. MtLUCAS

SUBJECT: Letter to Ambassador Johnson on "Fact Of"

To the right at TAB B is a letter for Mr. Packard's

signature. The Letter follows up the ExCom discussion

concerning "fact of" and states support for the NSAM 156

recommendation. Also mentioned is the protection of the

"fact of" SIGINT collectors in the context of future

assessments.

Care in developing a policy to cover SALT ratification

is also mentioned in order to introduce a greater sense of

urgency to the State Department.

RECOMMENDATION: At TAB A is a left hand memorandum

transmitting the letter to Mr. Packard. Your signature

is recommended.

TOP SECRET

imam MN AMMINIC 111“4101111

1101011PI 112410 II SUS met anur
.1 Jr.0 1.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON. D.C. 203O1

.,11111111

Dear Alex:

The NatiOnal Reconnaissance Program Executive Committee,

in its meeting on September 30, discussed the issue of revealing

the "fact of" satellite reconnaissance. The Committee strongly

supports the recommendation made to the President by the NSAM

156 Committee to await review of the international reactions to

NASA earth resources missions in testing the principle of overt

satellite overflight.

The Executive Committee drew a further distinction between

SIGINT and photographic satellite intelligence collection systems. It is felt strongly that SIGINT collection systems should

be treated separately and probably held,muchmore closely than

photographic systems in any future discussions of revealing the

"fact of" satellite reconnaissance.

Regarding the topic of SALT Ratification, I understand

that this issue is currently under review by the NSAM 156

Committee. I personally urge careful development of a policy

aimed at preventing inadvertent official release of the "fact,

of" satellite reconnaissance through discussions of national

means of verification.

Sincerely,

Ambassador U. Alexis Johnson

Under Secretary of State

for Political Affairs

Department of State

Washington, D. C.

cc: Mr. Helms

Dr. David

Dr. Mamas

H A HOLZ VI/1M

CONTROL. 5 ONL JOE SECRET
# C_2005112EN.01000101.xml

| 12.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 May 2005

(2005/C 112/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2882 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2008 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5443 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,49 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,050 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1695 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 196 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,910 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7636 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6543 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6001 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0449 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7570 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1148 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9453 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6618 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 181,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,895 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,800 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,8320 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,699 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2882

JPY

Japanese yen

135,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68410

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2008

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5443

ISK

Iceland króna

83,49

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

30,050

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1695

ROL

Romanian leu

36 196

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,910

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7636

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6543

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6001

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0449

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7570

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1148

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,20

ZAR

South African rand

7,9453

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6618

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 181,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,895

PHP

Philippine peso

69,800

RUB

Russian rouble

35,8320

THB

Thai baht

50,699

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HANOVER
DIRECT, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY, EXCEPT FOR GROSS ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND THE
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS, BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           7,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,659)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,401
<PP&E>                                          83,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,003)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,239
<BONDS>                                         67,485
<COMMON>                                        62,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,285
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,918
<SALES>                                        528,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               528,540
<CGS>                                          348,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  544,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,837)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        



</TABLE>
98-1929.

#### State v. Schultz.

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By *sua sponte*orders this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 97-1779, *State v. Conyers;*98-1929, *State v. Schultz;*and 98-2044, *State v. Snowder.*These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that time for oral argument shall be extended to twenty minutes per side.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that counsel for the state of Ohio in the above-named cases shall argue first and shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement. Counsel for the opposing parties in these cases shall divide the time allocated for argument by agreement.