alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# NROL-70

Launches
current page

The National Reconnaissance Office, in partnership with U.S. Space Force Space Launch Delta 45, Space Systems Command, and United Launch Alliance, successfully launched the NROL-70 mission on April 9, 2024 from Space Launch Complex-37 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. This launch marks the end of an era as it is the final Delta IV Heavy rocket and the end of the Delta program.

## About the Mission Emblem

The snow leopard illustrates the quiet strength with which we provide an advantage to the nation and its allies.Download the NROL-70 Poster.

## Launch Vehicle

### Delta IV Heavy

 United Launch Alliance’s Delta IV Heavy is a heavy-lift launch vehicle, the largest type of the Delta IV family and one of the world’s most powerful rockets. The Delta IV Heavy configuration is comprised of a common booster core (CBC), a cryogenic upper stage and a 5-meter diameter payload fairing (PLF). The Delta IV Heavy employs two additional CBCs as liquid rocket boosters to augment the first-stage CBC. The Delta IV Heavy can lift 28,370 kg (62,540 lbs) to low Earth orbit and 13,810 kg (30,440 lbs) to geostationary transfer orbit. It is an all liquid-fueled rocket, consisting of an upper stage, one main booster and two strap-on boosters.The Delta IV was created to fulfill the requirements of the United States Air Force’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program. The inaugural launch of the Delta IV occurred in 2002. NROL-70 is the last ever launch of ULA’s Delta IV of either medium or heavy variants. NROL-70 builds upon a long legacy of NRO Delta IV Heavy launches at Cape Canaveral dating back to 2009.

### Payload Fairing (PLF)

The PLF encapsulates the spacecraft to protect it from the launch environment on ascent. The 19.8m (63-ft) long PLF makes the vehicle’s height approximately 71.5 m (235 ft).

### Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS)

The DCSS is a cryogenic liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen fueled vehicle, with a single RL10C-2-1 engine that produces 110.1 kilo-Newtons (24,750 lbs) of thrust.

### Boosters

The Delta IV booster propulsion is provided by three liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen-burning RS-68A engines. Each RS-68A engine produces 312.3 kilo-Newtons (705,250 lbs) of thrust for a combined total liftoff thrust of more than 2.1 million pounds.

## Site Info

NROL-70 has launched from Space Launch Complex-37 (SLC-37) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida. SLC-37 was built in 1962 as Complex 37 to support the Saturn 1 and Saturn 1B programs. Between 1964 and 1968, it supported a total of eight unmanned Saturn launches but was eventually mothballed in 1971. In 1998, Boeing retrofitted it to launch the then-new Delta IV. The first Delta IV Heavy launch from SLC-37 was in December 2004. NROL-70 will be the eleventh Delta IV Heavy launch from Cape Canaveral, and the final Delta IV heavy launch in history.

Download the NROL-70 Press KitDownload the NROL-70 Press Release

## Ready to launch your career? 

Join our talented and diverse workforce today.
Explore Job Opportunities
1.1111.11,111111 ....4e,ve. 8- 0

kAt- /3-it

tog. 'v.. /6 - I

SUGGESTIONS FOR A CO DON STEININGER

The paper he has written is reasonably accurate and fair account

of the history of satellite reconnaissance policy.

It is probably good staff work to pass most of the paper to Dr.

DuBridge. By "most" of the paper, we mean pages 1 through 11.

3. Pages 12, 13 and 14 should be replaced by a short section which

states that these problems have been discussed almost daily by DOD

and NASA representatives and thatp because of these issues, a major

committee has been set up by the two agencies to work out differences.

The Manned Space Flight Policy Committee has done excellent work in

carrying out this function and, through its Survey Applications Coordinating

Committee, is now discussing what steps should be taken to adjust basic

security guidelines. We should hear from both DOD and NASA regarding

•

the outcome of these discussions very soon.

4. The last thing in the world we should do is to burden ExCom with

this issue. It is the wrong forum (NASA is not even represented) and,

if addressed, could easily find for stricter guidelines. We will resist

the introduction of this subject into ExCom and do not feel Dr. DuBridge

should be embarrassed by being the spokesman for such a venture.

taltAa. rq 6/ emobtthowd<

AvtitA Lao.. %Ask iv( tic( 1U scfc. Stac.c. fr.)44.*

fravatat 0.&, -fez ,4/•;144.). Gk. sivu, (la .~1

COMM NO 

C114.41/014.44.1(

/At (W4Alf4 44*LUtArt. A444 44744 4.4A "I

NMI ',42441 d4"°".

WOO AIPOWIT C

con paor

007 001ralet WOO le pis hOe *my,
1111111111

5. We would appreciate the opportunity to brief Dr. DuBridge on the

NRP, NRP Policies, and NRP-NASA Relationships. Our previous

requests to Don regarding this have brought no response. Can he

help us now?

FIF414ti FPO, &Opelis 1110160181

DOS DOI cove DDOO • 0 1101% val &Fr•

COolooL 40

COP,. Of COMO

mit OF 'NES
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 222 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe an additional 

requirement for the designation of marine sanctuaries off the coast 

of Alaska, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe 

an additional requirement for the designation of marine 

sanctuaries off the coast of Alaska, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE 

4 MARINE SANCTUARIES. 

5 Section 303 of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act 

6 (16 U.S.C. 1433) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 222 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Sec2 retary may’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection 

3 (c), the Secretary may’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not designate 

6 as a national marine sanctuary any area of the marine 

7 environment off the coast of Alaska seaward of the high 

8 tide line unless an Act of Congress— 

9 ‘‘(1) requires the Secretary to make such a des10 ignation; and 

11 ‘‘(2) prescribes the boundaries of the area to be 

12 given such designation by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                     |                                                                                |                                                |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                |                                                |
| Date:                  November 14, 2005 |                                                                                | /s/ *J.                  Leland Strange*  |
|                                     | J.                      Leland Strange Chief                      Executive Officer |
|                                     |                                                                                |

|   |                                                                                      |                                                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                      |                                                             |
|   |                                                                                      | /s/                      *Bonnie                      L. Herron* |
|   | Bonnie                          L. HerronChief                          Financial Officer |
|   |                                                                                      |

----
# National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents and Supporting Analysis

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Getting Assistance 
-  Environmental Compliance 
-  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents and Supporting Analysis 

NRCS programs are administered in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA documents for NRCS financial assistance, easement, and grant programs are available for download below.

## Financial Assistance Programs

###   Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)

EQIP Programmatic EA, May 2020(6.42 MB)

EQIP FONSI, October 2020(153.9 KB)

EQIP Programmatic EA, March 2016(7.61 MB)

EQIP FONSI, March 2016(2.79 MB)

EQIP Programmatic EA, January 2009(2.41 MB)

EQIP FONSI, January 2009(89.95 KB)

###   Conservation Stewardship Program

CSP-Programmatic-EA-April-2020.pdf(3.03 MB)

CSP-FONSI-October-2020.pdf(2.44 MB)

CSP-Programmatic-EA-January-2009.pdf(1.19 MB)

CSP-FONSI-June-2009.pdf(95.63 KB)

###   Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP)

RCPP-Programmatic-EA-November-2020.pdf(2.5 MB)

RCPP-FONSI-January-2021.pdf(134.67 KB)

###   Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)

WHIP-Programmatic-EA-January-2009.pdf(728.53 KB)

WHIP-FONSI-January-2009.pdf(51.21 KB)

###   Agricultural Management Assistance (AMA) Program

AMA-Programmatic-EA-and-FONSI-November-2002.pdf(1.9 MB)

----

## Easement Programs

###   Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP)

ACEP-Programmatic-EA-May-2020.pdf(3.04 MB)

ACEP-FONSI-December-2020.pdf(1.75 MB)

ACEP-Programmatic-EA-September-2016.pdf(12.34 MB)

ACEP-FONSI-October-2016.pdf(731.52 KB)

###   Wetland Reserve Program (WRP)

WRP-Programmatic-EA-January-2009.pdf(466.42 KB)

WRP-FONSI-January-2009.pdf(39.01 KB)

###   Farm and Ranch Land Protection Program (FRPP)

FRPP-Programmatic-EA-January-2009.pdf(613.61 KB)

FRPP-FONSI-January-2009.pdf(39.78 KB)

###   Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)

GRP-Programmatic-EA-January-2009.pdf(872.86 KB)

GRP-FONSI-August-2009.pdf(93.69 KB)

----

## Grant Programs

PCSC Programmatic EA August 2022(5 MB)

PCSC FONSI August 2022(254.97 KB)

2015-National-Programmatic-VPA-HIP-EA-June-2015.pdf(2.97 MB)

----

## Other NEPA Documents

Emergency Watershed Protection Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement(21.97 MB)

EA and FONSI: Environmental Assessment of NRCS Conservation Practices Used to Address Natural Resource Concerns (4.46 MB)

### Scott Blackburn

                      -    scott.blackburn@usda.gov 

##   Related Pages

Environmental Compliance

NRCS Environmental Evaluation CPA-52 Worksheet, Tools and Training
Download the CPA-52 worksheet and explore on-demand training, tools, guidance and other documents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CHARLES MCCULLOUGH,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 135 EM 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Subpoena for Judge/MDJ to Appear as Character** 

**Witness**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6 th**  **day of November, 2015, the Petition Pursuant to**

**Pa.R.J.A. 1701 for the Expedited Allowance of a Subpo ena Directed to a Sitting** 

**Commonwealth Court Judge is** GRANTED

**.**
Amendment 1 - Schedule of Interest and Fees


 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE

SCHEDULE OF INTEREST AND FEES



         This Amendment Number 1 to the Schedule of Interest and Fees ("Schedule Amendment") is made as of this
29th day of March, 2001, by and between Goleta National Bank, a national banking association ("GNB"), and Ace Cash
Express, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Ace"), with regard to the following:

	 GNB and Ace entered into that certain Master Loan Agency Agreement dated August 11, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), which included as Exhibit "E" thereto that certain Schedule of Interest and Fees (the "Schedule").




	 Contemporaneously with the execution of this Schedule Amendment, GNB and Ace are amending the
Agreement by that certain Amendment Number 1 to Master Loan Agency Agreement of even date herewith (as so
amended, the "Agency Agreement") and wish to amend the Schedule as set forth herein.



         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in
the Agency Agreement and in this Schedule Amendment, Ace and GNB hereby agree as follows:

         The following Paragraph 5 is added to, immediately after Paragraph 4 of, the Schedule:

 5. Exclusivity and Loan Compliance Fee. In consideration of the grant of exclusivity by
GNB to Ace provided in Section 1.6(b) of the Agency Agreement, and to assist GNB in offsetting
the costs of complying with regulatory requirements for originating the Bank Loans, Ace shall
pay to GNB a one-time Exclusivity and Loan Compliance Fee of $* on March 30, 2001, and $* on
the last business day of each calendar month, commencing April 30, 2001, up to and including
the earlier of (a) the last day of the month in which the POS Compliance Date (as that term is
defined in the Agency Agreement) occurs, or (b) June 30, 2001." 


	 Except as set forth in this Schedule Amendment, all terms used herein that are defined in the
Agency Agreement shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Agency Agreement.




	 Except as amended hereby, the Schedule is hereby affirmed in its entirety.




	 This Schedule Amendment may be signed in counterparts with the same effect as if both Parties
had signed the same paper; all counterparts are to be construed together to be one and the same document.








* Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of this document pursuant to an application for
confidential treatment sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such portions are omitted from this
filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Schedule Amendment to be duly executed by their
respective officers as of the day and year first above written.





		
		 GOLETA NATIONAL BANK
		
		By: 

		 Name: Llewellyn W. Stone
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		 ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.
		 By:

		 Name: Jay B. Shipowitz
		 Title: President and Chief Operating Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that Form
10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael T. Storm

Michael T. Storm
Chief Financial Officer
March 21, 2005


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CN Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by CN Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


      The following is a list of all subsidiaries of the Company, jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization and the percentage of shares owned, directly or
indirectly, by the Company.


                                STATE OR OTHER
                                JURISDICTION OF         PERCENTAGE OF
            NAME                INCORPORATION           SHARES OWNED
------------------------------- ---------------         -------------
Billing Concepts, Inc.             Delaware                 100%
Aptis, Inc.                        Delaware                 100%
CUville.com, Inc.                  Delaware                 100%
Enhanced Services Billing, Inc.    Delaware                 100%
FIData, Inc.                       Delaware                 100%
Princeton eCom Corporation         Delaware                  24%
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2387

In re: PERCY JAMES TUCKER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:09-cr-00182-AWA-DEM-1)

Submitted: January 10, 2022 Decided: January 14, 2022

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy James Tucker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2387 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Percy James Tucker petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking us to order the district 

court to stay the proceedings in his criminal case and to vacate the court’s order revoking 

his supervised release. “[M]andamus is a drastic remedy that must be reserved for 

extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) 

(internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts provide mandamus relief only 

when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires’; (2) 

petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indisputable’ right to the requested relief; and (3) the 

court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. 

Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004)). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for 

appeal after final judgment. Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed 

Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

We have reviewed Tucker’s petition and amended petition, and we conclude that he 

fails to show that he is entitled to the requested relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition 

and amended petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2387 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/14/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1



                          GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              3880 N. 28TH Terrace
                               Hollywood, FL 33020



March 22, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC  20549

           Re:  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP REPRESENTATIONS

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In accordance with Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X,
Guardian International, Inc. (the "Company") has received written
representations from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), its independent public
accountant, that the audit of the Company's financial statements included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2001, to which this letter is filed as an exhibit, was subject to Andersen's
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit, availability of national office consultation and
availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the
relevant portions of the audit.

                                 Very truly yours,

                                 GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                 By: /s/   HAROLD GINSBURG
                                    ---------------------------
                                          Harold Ginsburg
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           8,709
<SECURITIES>                                    38,295
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,827)
<INVENTORY>                                    126,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,408
<PP&E>                                         173,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                (95,109)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,303
<BONDS>                                        117,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,886
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,072
<SALES>                                        948,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               948,960
<CGS>                                          865,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  933,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                       584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1996 Stock Plan,
and the 1996 Director Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8)
pertaining to the 1994 Stock Plan of Borealis Technology Corporation of our
report dated January 16, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of
Borealis Technology Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP
Reno, Nevada
March 30, 1998
#### Borah, Respondent, vs. Hall and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Hughes & Anderson*of Superior.

For the respondent: *John F. Padden*of Superior.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.