alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005020EN.01000101.xml

| 25.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 January 2005

(2005/C 20/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3065 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4425 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6956 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5441 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 81,63 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5821 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,278 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4317 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,075 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 191 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,62 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7549 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6995 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5939 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1891 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8293 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1341 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 348,7 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7805 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3065

JPY

Japanese yen

134,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4425

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6956

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5441

ISK

Iceland króna

81,63

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5821

CZK

Czech koruna

30,278

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4317

PLN

Polish zloty

4,075

ROL

Romanian leu

38 191

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,62

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7549

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6995

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5939

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1891

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8293

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1341

KRW

South Korean won

1 348,7

ZAR

South African rand

7,7805

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Maine - Fiscal Year 2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

, ;• i :SPORIMTJON 

Pi npcnA • j r 

n? JAN 21 P !2: 03 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: January 27, 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

tSkiL 

William J. Wagnet__J ^ 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 27th day of January, 2012, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Bv First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
# ECP Cost Estimation

# ECP Practices and Costs

# Signature Sheet
map r.

IOW

• mumingunsl

la SEP 1962

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RESEARCH), CIA

SUBJECT: 44- NRO Satellite Operations Office

REFERENCE: Memorandum for Under Sec/AFer Dir (Research),

CIA, 9 Aug 1962, Said as above 808-62)

Regarding establishment of the-0)- NRO Operations Center I

concur in the observations outlined in your 9 August memorandum. Al...

though we will sot actually move the satellite operations function to the

Pentagon facility until everything is completely prepared and personnel

thoroughly trained, I feel that it is important that we proceed expeditiously in designing and developing this facility and training the people

who will operate It Heel strongly that those individuals of the CORONAMURAL operational planning team who will form the nucleus of the new

center should be identified now, notified of the pending change and, where

necessary, replacements requested to perform such other duties as these

individuals may be otherwise performing within your organization. Heel

this nucleus should be comprised of not less than two experienced

CORONA-MURAL operations personnel and such others as you may suggest. In the interest of a smooth interim working arrangement and to

promote an effective transfer of operations, it would appear essential

that, in addition to those of the CORGNA-MURAL operations team who

will form the nucleus of the {13)-NRO operations staff, those remaining

be made fully aware of these actions.

I have designated Colonel Thomas Z. Herron as Deputy for Operations in the-(8)-DDIRO Staff; who, along with an Assistant Deputy to be

designated by you, will have complete responsibility for all function of the

Operations Center. As additional Operations Center personnel are assigned,

it appears most advantageous to use these people to augment the CORONAMURAL operational staff at the Langley facility, to develop the enlarged

and experienced team required. hoold take over the planning

and operational control of • the additional workload of the upcoming . At

such time then, as the permanent-(13)-NRO lac the completely

functional team will be transferred with no disruption of operations.

. Copy — _of T Copies

Page___L-of--41-Pages.

Control N
In regard to your suggestion that an Air Force senior operations

officer participate in CORONA-MURAL operations, Colonel Herron, and

all members of his staff as they are sniped, should participate fully in

all aspects of all satellite operations matters. In view at Colonel Herron's

present responsibilities in getting the permanent-{ftNRO operational facility under way, both he and some of his personnel will necessarily miss some

of these operations activities. They will, however, participate to the maximum extent possible.

-,LAL64-

2.

r77-nr, • 411 PC.• •••n ••ntielic

..•••:'

11••• nro u -t. Tor Sr Cli -J.. Controlt
# C_2005050EN.01000101.xml

| 26.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 February 2005

(2005/C 50/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3165 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68975 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0724 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5426 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5837 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,723 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 242,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4313 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9233 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 226 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,71 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,858 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,704 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6824 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6358 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2685 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8288 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,152 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6994 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3165

JPY

Japanese yen

138,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68975

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0724

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5426

ISK

Iceland króna

80,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5837

CZK

Czech koruna

29,723

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

242,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4313

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9233

ROL

Romanian leu

36 226

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,71

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,858

TRY

Turkish lira

1,704

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6824

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6358

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2685

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8288

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,152

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,56

ZAR

South African rand

7,6994

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (NUREG-1743)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract 

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1743            -  Cover - Chapter 2 (PDF - 10.8 MB)
          -  Chapter 3 (PDF - 19 MB)
          -  Chapter 4 - End (PDF - 3.91 MB) 

## Publication Information 

**Date Published:** April 2002

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document is a safety evaluation report regarding the application to renew the operating license for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (ANO-1), which was filed by Entergy Operations, Inc., by letter dated January 31, 2000. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has reviewed the ANO-1 license renewal application for compliance with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants," and prepared this report to document its findings.

In its submittal of January 31, 2000, the Entergy Operations, Inc., requested renewal of the ANO-1 operating license (License No. DPR-51), which was issued under Section 104 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, for a period of 20 years beyond the current license expiration date of May 20, 2014. ANO-1 is located in Pope County in the central region of Arkansas on the shore of Lake Dardanelle. ANO-1 is a Babcock and Wilcox pressurized-water reactor nuclear steam supply system that is designed to generate 2568 MW thermal, or approximately 836 MW electric.

The NRC ANO-1 license renewal project manager is Robert J. Prato. Mr. Prato may be contacted by calling (301) 415-1147 or by writing to the License Renewal and Standardization Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
EXHIBIT  99.1

# Certification
Of Chief Executive Officer Of Ocean Energy, Inc.Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant ToSection
906 Of The SarbanesOxley Act Of 2002

I,
James T. Hackett, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Ocean Energy, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30,
2002 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that
section.

I
further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | \s\ James T. Hackett       James T. Hackett 
       Chariman of the Board, President
       and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12,
2002
NRO APP.ROVED FOR R~LEASE ( 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART .-

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

TO: L. Ha1askey 

Q 

FROM: J. Jack 

MEMORANDUM 

02425 

August 24, 1971 

SUBJECT: Cost Estimate for Hay Hook Test Program - ~ecovery of RV-3 

/\Ul~ 2 < 1971 

---------------------------------- ----------------------------------

The task description for the Hay Hook Test Progr~ - Recovery 

of RV-3 is as follows: 

Task Description . 

1. Design and fabricate a dUDDDy load. The requirements 

are as follows:. 

a. Size - Similar to a 50 gallon drum 

b. Weight - 1,000 lb. when used in air 

- 500 lb. 'equivalent weight when in water 

c. External Surface - Similar toa thick wood plank surface 

d. Handling- Provide lifting hooks 

2. 

Hook in air. 

Provide a crane and operator for tes~ing o~ th~ Hay 

3. Provide the procedtire and report of handling test. 

The cost estimate is as follows: 

Engineering 

Technician 

Purchases 

80 hrs. @ 18.42 

40 hra. @ 12.09 

= 

-

• 

$1,474 

484 

~500 

$2,458 

This anticipates that there will' be fabrication coataof . $500 from someone such as. Vaghi Brothers, Bethel. Connecticut for the 

dummy load. 

I 

I .! 

i 
• i 

NRO APPROVED FOR R~LEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: CIIART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

L. MolasItey" 

Page 2 

August 24, 1971 

( 

." 

In order to have the dummy load and procedure ready by 

September 27,1971, Test Department will require a turn "on by September 1, 1971. 

JTJ:hc 

cc: GBeniash 

JDiMicco 

Prepared by :--r:-~~~~~-----

Approved by: Cv4;,;; ~ E 

c. 0" Bryan 

j 

--.
Date: Time: Location: Next Generation Aerial Services UAV Pilot pre - flight checklist: Physical inspection of UAV: Notes:________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Physical inspection of Remote Control: Notes:______________________________________ __________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Proper personnel on - site: Notes:________________________________________________________________________________
_______________

______________________________________________________________________ Proper notifications and permissions received, Property owner/manager, FAA, COA,_________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________ ______________________________________________________________ Weather conditions:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Safe distance perimeter set:______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Flight notes:_________________________________________________________________ _______________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; and
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 15, 2007
    /s/ J. Leland StrangeJ. Leland StrangeChief Executive Officer
EX-10.1






NOTE




	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	September 29, 2008
	Maker: Claimsnet.com, Inc.

	Payee:
	 	Thomas Michel
	Place for Payment:
	 	14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, TX  75254
	Principal Amount:
	 	Twenty Thousand U.S. dollars (USD$20,000.00)






Annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Principal from Date of Funding: Five percent (5%)



Terms of Payment: Principal and interest shall be due and payable on demand, interest being
calculated on the unpaid principal balance to the date of each installment paid, and the payment
made credited first to the discharge of interest accrued and the balance to the reduction of the
principal. Accrued and unpaid interest shall be computed on the basis of the actual days elapsed
in a year consisting of 365 days on the principal.



Annual Interest Rate on Demanded, Unpaid Amounts: The highest rate allowed by law.



Security for Payment: None



Maker promises to pay to the order of Payee at the place for payment and according to the
terms of payment the principal amount plus interest at the rates stated above. All unpaid amounts
shall be due upon demand.



On default in the payment of this note or in the performance of any obligation in any
instrument securing or collateral to it, this note and all obligations in all instruments securing
or collateral to it shall become immediately due at the election of Payee. Maker and each surety,
endorser, and guarantor waive all demands for payment, presentations for payment, notices of
intention to accelerate maturity, notices of acceleration of maturity, protest, and notices of
protest.



If this note or any instrument securing or collateral to it is given to an attorney for
collection or enforcement, or if suit is brought for collection or enforcement, or if it is
collected or enforced through probate, bankruptcy, or other judicial proceeding, then Maker shall
pay Payee reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to other amounts due. Reasonable attorney’s fees
shall be 10.0% of all amounts due unless either party pleads otherwise.



Nothing in this note shall authorize the collection of interest in excess of the highest rate
allowed by law.



Maker reserves the right to prepay the outstanding principal balance of this Note, in whole or
in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. Any such pre-payment shall
be made together with payment of interest accrued on the amount of principal being prepaid through
the date of such prepayment, and shall be applied to the installments of principal due hereunder in
the inverse order of maturity.



Each Maker is responsible for the entire amount of this note.



The terms Maker and Payee and other nouns and pronouns include the plural if more than one.



Maker shall not be deemed to be in default of this note unless and until Maker shall have been
given seven (7) days written notice and opportunity to cure such default, via certified mail return
receipt requested.



Claimsnet.com, Inc.



By:  /s/ Don Crosbie



Don Crosbie, CEO



MAKER
#### Laurent, Respondent, vs. Herbst, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Brown county dated October 28, 1927: N. J. Monahan, Judge.

Automobile accident. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *McGillan & Aik*of Green Bay.

For the respondent: *Sheridan, Evrard & Cranston*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.