II 

II 

TEST REPORT 

for 

Hanson Brick 

Monroe, NC 

Prepared for: 

Hanson Brick East, LLC dba Hanson Brick 

2304 Brickyard Road & US Highway 7 4 

Monroe, NC 2811 

Prepared by: 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

P. 0. Box 12353 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2353 

(919) 544-6338 

Test Date: November 30, 2006 

II 

II 
Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-{)396-HBCJ 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page ii 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Report Certification 

This report has been reviewed by the following Air-Tech Environmental, LLC personnel 

and is a true representation of the results obtained from the sampling program for Brick Kiln 

3LK at the Monroe, NC facility. The sampling and analytical methods were performed in 

accordance with procedures approved by the State of North Carolina. 

A Qualified Source Test Individual (QSTI) from Air-Tech Environmental, LLC was 

present during the test. 

Team Leader: 

Michael W. Hartman, Principal Scientist Date 

Qualified Source 

Reviewer: 

Date 

Qualified Source Test Individual 
sOURCE EVALUATION SOCIETy 

Qualified Source 

~ 

Test Individual 

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT 

MICHAEL W. HARTMAN 

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSNE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED 

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES 

ISSUED BY THESES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDMDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR 

INSTRUMENTAL METHODS 

soURCE EVALUATION SOCI

Qualified Source • Test Individua

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT 

MICHAEL W. HARTMAN 

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SAT

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELIN

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDMDUAL REVIEW BOAR

BABIC KNOWI.BDOB AND MANUAL PARTICUUTB SAMPUNG ME

ISSUED THIS 12"' DAY OF JULY, 2004 AND EFFECTNE UNTIL JULY II"', 

A""",J'&d h;:: o~ 

-· - - ·- ' LeRoy F. 01wta1 

SES VIA PrNidetlf•rrdOST1R.vlew8oanl 

APPLICATION NO. 2004·005 

soURCE EVALUATION SOCIE

Qualified Source • Test Individual 

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT 

MICHAEL W. HARTMAN 

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSNE EXAMINATION AND SATISF

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES 

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDMDUAL REVIEW BOARD F

M&NUAL GAS SOI7.RCE SAMPUNG METHODS 

ISSUED THIS 12"' DAY OF JULY, 2004 AND EFFECTNE UNTIL JULY 11"', 20

h;::O~ 

L;-Ro; F. OwwJ• SES W.:. PruldMf •nd QSn Rnlew BOMI 

APPLICATION NO. 2004-005 
sOURCE EVALI:Li\.TION SOCIE

Qualified Source Test Individual 

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT 

DARRELL H. DOERLE 

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISF

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES 

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDMDUAL REVIEW BOARD 

BASIC KNOWU:DOB AND MANUAL PARTICUL.4.T.E s.tJIIP.LliiO METH

AT 0..-..a L~YF.aw.n. SES ~ Pruld.tJtRnd QSTI ~'rlew Bo.rd 

APPLICATION NO. 2004-002 

sOURCE EVALUATION ~OCIET

Qualified Source ~ Test Individual 

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT 

DARRELL H. DOERLE 

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIE

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES 

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDMDUAL REVIEW BOARD FO

lNSTRUMBNJ'AL MBTBODS 
Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (ATOG-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page v 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 

2.0 RESULTS SUMMARY .................................................. 2 

2.1 HF and HCI Sampling Results ...................................... 2 

2.2 Particulate Matter Sampling Results ................................. 3 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS ................................. 4 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/ QUALITY CONTROL .............................. 8 

Table 1. 

Table 2. 

Table 3. 

Figure 1 

Figure 2 

Appendices 

Appendix A 

Appendix B 

Appendix C 

Appendix D 

Appendix E 

Tables 

HF and HCI Results Summary ...................................... 2 

Method 5 Results Summary - Outlet ................................. 3 

QA Summary ................................................... 9 

Figures 

Process Schematic, Hanson Brick (Columbia, SC) ...................... 6 

Method 26A Sampling Train ........................................ 7 

Field Data Sheets and Run Summaries 

Appendix A.1 Inlet 

Appendix A.2 Outlet 

Analytical Report 

Meter Calibrations 

Process Documentation 

Example Calculations 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (ATOS-{)396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 1 

On November 30, 2006, Air-Tech Environmental performed sampling at the Hanson 

Brick Monroe, NC facility per Air Permit No. 03752T27. Emissions testing was 

conducted to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits and to develop 

operational limits for an existing affected source as defined in Subpart JJJJJ of Part 63 

NESHAP. The testing was conducted at brick kiln no. 3LK. 

The kiln exhaust is d ucted to a common scrubber (a dry lime absorber or DLA, 

ID # CD-8), to remove hydrogen fluoride (HF) emissions from the exhaust stream. 

Sampling was conducted at the exhaust stack of the DLA to characterize emissions of 

HF and hydrogen chloride (HCI) using the sampling procedures of Method 26A. 

Filterable particulate matter (PM) was measured at the outlet of the exhaust stack using 

the sampling procedures of Method 5. Additionally, Method 26 samples were collected 

at the inlet to the DLA in order to determine the DLA removal efficiency for HF and HCI. 

A summary of the results is presented in the table below. These results indicate 

Hanson Brick is operating in compliance with the MACT requirements. 

This report presents the results of the sampling in Section 2. A description of the 

sampling locations and the methodologies employed in emissions characterizations are 

contained in Section 3. Section 4 presents an assessment of the quality control 

measures taken during the performance of this test program. 

Mass Rate 

lblhr lblton 

Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet DRE 

PM NM 0.56 NM 0.038 N/A 

HF 5.71 0.032 0.385 0.0021 99.44 

HCI N/A 0.52 N/A 0.035 N/A 

a NM =not measured 

b N/A =not applicable to compliance assessment 
2.0 RESULTS SUMMARY 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 2 

Three test runs were conducted for the determination of emission rates for each of the 

compounds of interest. Test summaries grouped by compounds of interest are 

presented below. Efforts were made, successfully, to collect all samples during steady 

production rates of a single type of product. The brick production rate during the testing 

averaged 14.8 tons per hour. Pressure drop across the DLA averaged 0.16"H20 for the 

test periods. The limestone feed rate during the compliance test was maintained at 154 

pounds per hour. 

2.1 HF and HCI Sampling Results 

Samples were collected simultaneously at the DLA inlet and exhaust for all three test 

runs. A summary of the results of the HF and HCI flue gas concentrations and 

emission rates is presented in Table 1. All tests did comply with field sampling 

procedures pertaining to sample train operating temperatures and leak checks. 

Flue gas concentrations of HF were found to average 213 ppm at the DLA inlet and 

0.84 ppm at the outlet. These concentrations yield mass rates of HF that average 5. 71 

lb/hr into the DLA and 0.032 lb/hr out. These measurements show a removal efficiency 

exceeding 99.44% for HF. 

Flue gas concentrations of HCI averaged 10.8 and 7.52 ppm at the DLA inlet and outlet 

gas streams, respectively. These concentrations yield mass emission rates of 0.53 and 

0.52 lb/hr. 

Table 1. HF and HCI Results Summary 

Flue Gas Concentration Mass Rate 

Run#/ Flow {dscfm) HF(ppm) HCI{ppm) HF{Iblhr) HCI(Ib/hr) DRE(%) Inlet Run 

Times lb/ton lblton 

Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet brick Inlet Outlet brick HF HCI 

1 8098 11528 210 0.77 10.6 6.78 5.28 0.028 0.0018 0.49 0.44 0.030 99.47 N/A 1040-1140 

2 8948 12279 215 1.08 10.8 7.85 5.99 0.041 0.0028 0.55 0.55 0.037 99.32 N/A 1153-1253 

3 8757 12531 214 0.68 11.0 7.94 5.87 0.027 0.0018 0.55 0.56 0.038 99.54 N/A 1300-1400 

Average 8601 12113 213 0.84 10.8 7.52 5.71 0.032 0.0021 0.53 0.52 0.035 99.44 N/A 
2.2 Particulate Sampling Results 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Brick!/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 3 

Particulate sampling was performed at the outlet only for the determination of filterable 

PM using procedures of Method 5. These results are presented in Table 2. The 

average concentration of PM was found to be 0.0055 grains per dry standard cubic foot 

(gr/dscf), ranging from 0.0025 to 0.0100 gr/dscf. These concentrations yield emission 

rates that range from 0.26 to 0.99 lb/hr, and average 0.56 lb/hr. 

Table 2. Method 5 Results Summary - Outlet 

Emission 

Outlet Run Concentration Flow Rate Emission Rate 

Run# Times (gr/dscf) (dscfm) (#lhr) (lblton brick) 

1 1027-1133 0.0100 11528 0.99 0.066 

2 1200-1303 0.0025 12279 0.26 0.018 

3 1328-1432 0.0040 12531 0.43 0.029 

Average 0.0055 12113 0.56 0.038 
Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 4 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS 

The samples were collected from the exhaust of the brick kilns, a natural gas-fired 

process operating continuously 24 hours per day, seven days per week. There were no 

PM control of emissions from these sources; acid gases were scrubbed in a dry lime 

absorber prior to exhaust. A schematic of the process exhaust is contained in Figure 1. 

Inlet samples were collected from a circular duct 55 inches in diameter. Two sampling 

ports, placed at right angles, provided for access for velocity traverses. A total of 12 

points were sampled for velocity measurements. A schematic of this test location 

showing sample point location on the "Traverse Point Location Form" has been 

appended with the test data. 

DLA outlet sampling was conducted at the exhaust stack from a duct 57 inches in 

diameter. This sampling location met the requirements of Method 1 allowing a 12-point 

particulate matter test to be conducted. A schematic of this location on the "Traverse 

Point Location Form" showing point placement has been appended as well. 

Three one-hour samples simultaneously were collected from each sampling location. 

Concurrent with the testing readings of DLA pressure drop were made at the facility 

monitor, a photohelic differential pressure gauge. These readings were logged 

instrumentally at approximately 5 minute intervals by facility monitors. 

Sampling was performed according to the procedures of Method 26A at the outlet test 

location. These procedures entail isokinetic collection of a particulate sample followed 

by collection of acid gases in dilute solutions of sulfuric acid. A schematic of this 

sampling train is contained in Figure 2. Note that the caustic impingers used for the 

collection of diatomic halogens was not used. 

The flue gas sample was withdrawn through a glass nozzle into a glass probe. 

Particulate matter was filtered through a heated Teflon filter and then entered the 

impinger portion of the sampling train. This impinger portion consisted of two impingers 

containing 100 ml of 0.1 N sulfuric acid each followed by an empty impinger, then a 

silica gel containing impinger used for final moisture collection. A type S pitot tube and 

type K thermocouple were used to measure velocity pressures and temperatures at 

each sampling point. A calibrated dry gas meter was used to measure sample volume. 

A calibrated orifice placed on the meter outlet was used to set sample rate. 
Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 5 

Inlet sampling was conducted according to the procedures of Method 26. The nonisokinetic Method 26 sample was collected from three points at the inlet location. 

With the exception of not collecting a particulate fraction at the DLA inlet, sample 

recovery resulted in the collection of the following sample fractions. 

• Acetone washes, with brushing, of those portions of the sample train 

upstream of the filter. 

• The filter. 

• The sulfuric acid impinger solutions and water rinses of all exposed glass 

surfaces downstream from the filter to the inlet to the silica gel impinger. 

• The silica gel. 

Acetone washes were dried down in tared beakers for the gravimetric determination of 

weight gain. This gain, added to that determined for the tared filters, made up the 

particulate total of the sample. The total mass of PM collected was divided by the 

sample volume to determine particulate concentration (gr/dscf). This value was 

multiplied by flue gas flow rate to determine mass emission rate (lb/hr). Mass 

emissions were divided by production rates to determine emissions in terms of brick 

production rates (lb/ton). Complete example calculations as well as the analytical and 

run data have been appended. 

The acid matrix samples were analyzed for fluoride and chloride ions following the ion 

chromatography analytical procedures of Method 26A. These analyses yielded liquid 

concentrations for the ions of interest (ug/ml). Conversions of ion concentration to acid 

concentration were made on a one to one basis. These acid concentrations were then 

converted to total mass of the compound of interest collected using the liquid sample 

volume. This total mass was then converted to mass rates for each sampling location 

in fashion similar to the particulate matter calculations. DLA removal efficiencies were 

calculated based on the calculated mass rates of the compounds of interest at the inlet 

and outlet. Complete analytical summaries and example calculations have been 

appended. 

After noting the post test weight gain, the silica gel was discarded. This weight gain 

was added to that determined for the rest of the impinger train prior to sample recovery. 

The total weight gain of the impinger train was attributed to flue gas water vapor and 

used for flue gas moisture fraction calculations (Method 4 ). Flue gas fixed gas analysis 

was performed on bags collected during each test using the grab procedures of Method 

3 using an Orsat combustion analyzer. These data, along with the velocity pressure 

and temperature (Method 2) determined each sample point (Method 1) during the 

performance of the isokinetic sampling were used to calculate flue gas volumetric flow 

rates used in mass rate calculations. 
KILN 3LK 

Kiln Exhaust Fan 

Inlet Duct 

Inlet 

Sampling 

Location 

f 

Ul 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Brickl/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 6 

,---

141.8" 

DLA 

0 

i (11.8') 

l DLA 

STACK 

890.2" 

[ 

t 

DLA 

Fan 

Figure 1. Process Schematic, Hanson Brick 
AirFlow 

TypeS Pilot Tube 

Filter 

Oven 

.. .. .. I

•• lceBathl" "I "I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IH1 .. lii1 .. .. .. .:: .:: 

Temperature 

Sensors • 0.1N H2S04 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (ATOG-0396-HBC) 

-

Empty Silica Gel 

(300 grams) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 7 

Temperature Sensor 

Vacuum 

Line 

Figure 2. Method 26A Sampling Train 
Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Brick//Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBCJ 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 8 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE I QUALITY CONTROL 

The Quality Assurance (QA) procedures required by the reference methodologies 

employed during the testing were strictly adhered to during the performance of this test 

program. Such adherence ensures production of useful and valid data throughout the 

course of the project. An analytical audit sample was not provided to Air-Tech for 

analysis, therefore the measures made as described below comprise the analytical QA. 

Control criteria for these measures are not specified in the method. The QA 

procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling 

and analytical scheme. The acceptance criteria, control limits, and the results of these 

measures obtained during this testing and analysis are summarized in Table 4. A brief 

discussion of the QA measures is presented below. 

QA measures taken to provide some assessment of the quality of sample collection 

included measures of sampling rate, and the assessment of the accuracy of metered 

gas volumes and the integrity of sampling train. Outlet sampling rates, assessed as % 

isokinetics, met method criteria for all test runs. Therefore, any sample bias caused by 

non representative collection of differing particle sizes (either particulate matter or water 

droplets) was within acceptable limits. The dry gas meters used for sample volume 

determination meet method criteria for accuracy. Post-test sample train leak checks 

meet the method criteria for all test runs. 

The analytical measures of QA meet the method criteria for acetone purity, an 

assessment of the Method 5 analysis. The Method 26A analytical QC relies on 

performance of an audit to be provided at the discretion of the SCDHEC. In absence of 

such a sample the analytical QA assessment was made based on the measurements 

tabulated in Table 4. These data show that the analysis suffered no significant bias 

due to the reagents or the sample matrix. All duplicate analysis show a precision of 

measurement of exceeding 2% of the reported value for all measurements. The 

calibration linearity indicates the results will be accurate regardless of where they fall on 

the calibration curve. 
I 

a 

Criteria 

Sampling 

% lsokinetics 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration (M26) 

Post Test Calibration Check (M26A) 

Sample Train Leak Rate (M26A) 

Analytical 

Acetone Blank (M5) 

H2S04 Blank (M26A) 

Water Blank (M26A) 

Matrix Spike Recovery 

Duplicate Analysis, Inlet 

Duplicate Analysis, Outlet 

Calibration Linearity 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC 

Hanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-0396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 9 

Table 3. QA Summary, 

I Control Limit I Result I 

100 ± 10% Inlet NA 

Outlet 101.6- 102.7% 

1.00 ± 2% Inlet 1.0052 

Outlet 0.9961 

yd ± 5% Inlet 0.96 

Outlet 1.03 

<0.02 cfm Inlet 0.00-0.00 

Outlet 0.00-0.00 

:s; 0.001 wt% O.OOOOg/1 00 

results 

HF ND 

HCI 0.041Jg/ml a 

HF ND 

HCI ND 

Not specified HF 104% 

Not specified HCI 105% 

± 5% mean HF 0.0-0.6% 

± 5% mean HCI 0.0-0.2% 

± 5% mean HF 0.1 -1.5% 

± 5% mean HCI 0.0-2.1% 

Not specified HF R2 = 0.9997 

Not specified HCI R2 = 0.9994 

Value falls between the method detection limit and limit of quantization. 
I 

a 

Criteria 

Sampling 

% lsokinetics 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration {M26) 

Post Test Calibration Check {M26A) 

Sample Train Leak Rate (M26A) 

Analytical 

Acetone Blank (M5) 

H2S04 Blank (M26A) 

Water Blank (M26A) 

Matrix Spike Recovery 

Duplicate Analysis, Inlet 

Duplicate Analysis, Outlet 

Calibration Linearity 

Air-Tech Environmenta-t;t:t:cHanson Bricki/Monroe, NC Test Report (AT06-D396-HBC) 

Test Date: 11/30/2006- Page 9 

Table 3. QA Summary 

I Control Limit I Result I 

100 ± 10% Inlet NA 

Outlet 101.6-102.7% 

1.00 ± 2% Inlet 1.0052 

Outlet 0.9961 

Yct ± 5% Inlet 0.96 

Outlet 1.03 

<0.02 cfm Inlet 0.00-0.00 

Outlet 0.00-0.00 

:s; 0.001 wt% O.OOOOg/1 00 

HF ND 

HCI 0.09 tJg/ml a 

HF ND 

HCI ND 

Not specified HF 104% 

Not specified HCI 105% 

± 5% mean HF 0.0-0.6% 

± 5% mean HCI 0.0-0.2% 

± 5% mean HF 0.1 -1.5% 

± 5% mean HCI 0.0-2.1% 

Not specified HF R2 = 0.9997 

Not specified HCI R2 = 0.9994 

Value falls between the method detection limit and limit of quantization. 
Appendix A 

Field Data Sheets and 

Run Summaries 

Appendix A.1 Inlet 

Appendix A.2 Outlet 
Appendix A.1 

Inlet 
Facility; 

Date: 

Location: 

Run Number: 

sample Type: 

Hanson/Monroe 

11i30i2006 

Inlet Plant 3 

R1 • Inlet 

HF/HCI 

Average Stack Temperature C'!=} 

_§l1~~k_A~a _ _(~g lr1L _____ ..... ___ _ 

Actual Meter Volume (cu ft) 

Average Meter Pressure (in H20) 

Moisture Collected (g) __ 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 

Oxygen Concentration (%V) 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 

Nozzle Diameter (in) 

Pitot c~:mstant 

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 

Start Time~ 

End Time: 

Initial Leak Check: 

Final Leak Check: 

0.000@5" 

0.000@6" 

1040 

1140 

60.0 

29.55 

-0.50 . ··-·· ~- ·-· 

370.13. 

2375.83 ---- -----·--····· 

34.44S 

1.10 

92.75 

134.10 

8.0 

13.0 

79.0 . ----- ------·--·---------- ---- ... -. .. ·~-- ------·· 

1.0052 

NA 

0.84 

0.547 

32.827 

Standard Metered Volume (dsc@ __ _ __________ _ 0.930 

Staek Moisture t% 'i)_ _ 16,12 

Mole Fraction Ory Stack Gas 0.639 

Qry Molecul!!r Weight 29.80 

Wet MoJecular We_ight__ ___ _ 27.90 

931.65 --- ------- ----------------- - ----· ------------·········--·------------ --------------------- ---- --------- -----·---

stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 15371.04 

435.31 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 8097.97 

VoJu.ITl_~tric_ f"lo'J\f R~t~_(d~cmrn) __________ ... 229.33 

Percent lsokine-tic ERR 

Percent Excess Air 165.15 -······---···---··---·····-- ··-··-·· --······--- ---·· ... -- ·--····---·· ··-- ···---··· --

Concentration (g/dscm) 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant Hanson/Monroe 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature (°F) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

A-7 

A-8 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

B-7 

B-8 

Averages 

11/30/2006 

Plant 3 

Inlet Run 1 

86 

29.6 

-0.5 

CFD IV 

1040-1140 

Velocity Stack Square 

HeaddP Ts Root of 

(in H20) (OF) dP 

0.05 370 0.22 

0.06 373 0.24 

0.06 370 0.24 

0.05 372 0.22 

0.04 374 0.20 

0.04 370 0.20 

0.04 372 0.20 

0.04 360 0.19 

0.05 370 0.22 

0.06 370 0.24 

0.06 370 0.24 

0.07 370 0.27 

0.07 371 0.26 

0.07 371 0.25 

0.06 371 0.25 

0.04 371 0.21 

370.31 0.23 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture(%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area (sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps) 

16.10558 

17.67465 

17.64278 

16.12498 

14.43995 

14.40527 

14.42262 

13.39345 

15.61494 

17.19606 

17.34624 

19.59329 

18.79349 

18.37425 

17.94522 

15.11748 

16.51 

16345.60 

10270.30 

8614.73 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm) 

966.33501 

1060.47902 

1058.56696 

967.49900 

866.39727 

864.31631 

865.35741 

803.60684 

936.89655 

1031.76345 

1040.77465 

1175.59727 

1127.60951 

1102.45520 

1076.71340 

907.04871 

990.71 

13 

8 

79 

16.12 

0.8388 

29.8 

27.89784 

55 

16.49881559 
Ar~ 

FIELD OAT A SHEET 

,~----

.. 

-~---

---

--------- -·-------

Plant :JJAAJ 

S' Dll"' g,i .._j, Probe Length & Type /b I 

(;1114-~'!1 

Filter Number 

Date· l'l~Lo t~o~ A?.- 2 ~ It /io lt.u<~ Nozzle ID (in.) AJ 114 Height of Location (ft) ""' '2,....,, 

sad.i)lrng.Location, 

1.:~-'-

~-\-?.. 

Pilot Constant .84 Duct Dimensions (in.) 

~ ...... 7-5"'M, 

Sample Type ·"· ~ '· Meter Box Number A"r D Stack Geometry (R or C) c .. 

Run Number 

~I 

-

~f'l MeterAH@ {. 7~3_ Assume Moisture (%) II __::;

Operator 

C..\'::0~ 

Yd j. oos~ 02 (%) 13 

Ambient Temperature 9!tJ)o,;. K Factor 

"'/Jf C02 (%) 

~ 

Barometric Pressure (ln.) ;;.q. t. 0 Probe Heater Setting (°F) :;.so Nitrogen (%) .. 79 Static Pressure (ln. H20) ' I S'O Heater Box Setting (°F) 

~so 

Moisture Collected (g) 

Initial Leak Check 

lo.oool?_~ 

Final Leak Check 

~~/)047 e r, ·'b.. 

---------- --- ----

, 

·----- - vel] ----------

.--------- ·---------·--

ReadandR· ·dAI/Data E g 

Mt 

Sampling Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter Velocity Orifice Temperature Traverse Time Clock Time Reading Head Pressure Flue Gas Probe Filter Point 

(min) (24-hr) vm (ftl) AP Differential Temperature Temperature Temperature Number Inlet Outle

(in. H20) AH (in. H20) c·F> c·F> c·F> c·F> c·F> 

A 

2 

I 0 1oUn I et«<~ .t.!b \ o.os I . I '370 ;z32.. ~3"?1 g¢ 

~¢ 

-~-

lq'l~. :uJ /":}. blit '37.3 .:l'C., :1.3¥ Qo ~~ 

3 I !it 

lq57_.o/ 1D, 0\.D ':S7o ";. 3'1 j.35' 91/ ~~ 

-~~ 

$> 

1.&1 

~~ 

1

CfS"~ .. 

5~ tJ~ O'$' ?72. 

~'Is- ;1~;2. '17 aQ 

~ 'lb 

lql~ 

9t.J/. 0 () In. ot/ 

~.,1./ 

~S_a_ ~~A 9q -9o 

7 C/B 1-qio. 

1./z. 

(J.~ :370 .:2-$0 2.4/~ J ll I fii? 

;1. :> In. nl./ 3? 2.. A50 2t./7 /o7- 93 

8 

s~ 

o//cf. 85"' I o. o35» 3t.:,o :Z.So .:is-o In 'ill, 7fi7 

"'~ 

ll¥rl [q?-i.tn'l " 1/ 

9 ( lo.o41 _3_7l) 

2-

D.O~ 3"1 0 

2 o o58 _3_'2~ q ID. oitJ 37D 

c; In O(l)A '!., ) 

... ln. oc. 5" "l 7 1 7 o. oc-:z. '3'77 ~ In Dift./ ~II 

--

------ -----------·-

------

. 

---- ---- ---· . ----- ----

----~ ···-. ·- ·-· ----------------- ----------- -. - .. , - . -- . - - ·- --

.... 

-
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant J111JII I tJ rt 

Date !I- 3() -ofa 

Samollna Location --tAll{_,+ 

Run Number I .. 

lmolnaer Box Number 

Recoverv Person 

Recoverv Rinses 

Samolina Identification 

Filter Number D It, j.(~ D :A _. ,2~ 

_XAO Number 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution lmplnger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 t /;U ~ ~()y I ()0 rttL Af]G-) i-& t. ~ &11- 5 

2 , lrJ liz ~ Y o~ 111L &:; +Yt-+ 7();!' 8 

3 bu-1.;1 f) fV1 C-5 (,31_ I" £-;3, <f 

4 ~t:-1 ,~I ? ~W\ L-. ;/) (_,~ '1t<\.q 1~9, _] 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) \ ?7~ I I 
Facility: Hanson/Monroe Start Time: , 153 

Date: 11/30/2006 Erid Time: 1253 

Location: h11et Plant 3- Initial Leak Check: 0.000@5" 

Run Number: R2- lrHef Final Leak Check: 0.000@5" 

sample Type: HF/HCI 

Total Sampling Time (min) 60.0 

Corrected Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 29.59 

Absolute Stack Pressure (in Hg) 29.55 

Stack Static Pressure (in H20) -0.50 

Average Stack Temperature COF) 369.38 

Stack Area (sq in) 2375.83 

Actual Meter Volume (cu ft) 34.789 

Average Meter Pressure (in H20) 1.10 

Average Meter Temperature COF) 99.63 

Moisture Collected (g) 134.40 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 6.5 

Oxygen Concentration (% V) 12.0 

Nitrogen Concentration (o/oV) 81.5 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 1.0052 

Nozzle Diameter (in) NA 

Pitot Constant 0.84 

Average Sampling Rate (dscfm) 0.545 

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 32.725 

Standard Metered Volume (dscm) 0.927 

Stack Moisture (% V) 16.20 

Mole Fraction Dry Stack Gas 0.838 

Dry Molecular Weight 29.52 

Wet Molecular Weight 27.65 

Stack Gas Velocity (fpm) 1029.38 

Stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 313.75 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 16983.53 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 480.97 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 8947.86 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 253.40 

Percent lsokinetic ERR 

Percent Excess Air 125.89 

Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature CF) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

A-7 

A-8 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

8-7 

8-8 

Averages 

Hanson/Monroe 

11/30/2006 

Plant3 

Inlet Run 2 

85 

29.6 

-0.5 

CFDIV 

1153-1253 

Velocity Stack 

Head dP Ts 

(in H20) r•FJ 

0.07 367 

0.07 371 

0.07 370 

0.06 371 

0.06 373 

0.05 369 

0.04 367 

0.04 367 

0.05 370 

0.06 370 

0.06 370 

0.06 369 

0.06 370 

0.05 370 

0.05 369 

0.04 368 

369.44 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Square 

Root of 

dP 

0.25 

0.26 

0.26 

0.24 

0.24 

0.22 

0.20 

0.20 

0.22 

0.24 

0.24 

0.23 

0.24 

0.22 

0.22 

0.20 

0.23 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture(%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area (sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps) 

18.41068 

19.15183 

19.14030 

17.73115 

17.75248 

16.16675 

14.44252 

14.44252 

16.17650 

17.72047 

17.72047 

16.95583 

17.72047 

16.17650 

16.16675 

14.45126 

16.90 

16725.25 

10519.93 

8815.70 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm) 

1104.64059 

1149.10969 

1148.41783 

1063.86885 

1065.14879 

970.00512 

866.55137 

866.55137 

970.59021 

1063.22831 

1063.22831 

1017.34996 

1063.22831 

970.59021 

970.00512 

867.07532 

1013.72 

12 

6.5 

81.5 

16.2 

0.838 

29.52 

27.65376 

55 

16.49881558526 
At~ 

Plant 

Date 

·"t·' SartiJ)IIhg .Location. 

Sample Type !• .•' .. 

Run Number 

Operator 

Ambient Temperature 

Barometric Pressure (ln.) 

Static Pressure (ln. H20) 

Initial Leak Check 

Sampling 

Traverse Time 

Point (min) 

Number 

Jl I {') 

z_ s 

3 

I~ 

" ZJ.I 

'5 32.. 

c... C/o 

'7 

f(~ 

f> 

s~ 

ltlo 

il I 

l. 

J 

lf 

s ~ 2 

6 

-------- L- --

---~-

---

FIELD DATA SHEET 

Jrt~~-~ l. 'C. 

---

-----·-

- --·------- I-f lf-rJ~o~ Br; ,\L Probe Length & Type ~I L!h.s. ~ Filter Number 

O<.(r,O~- Z.$" 

It J?.o/-z.oo'-" Nozzle ID (in.) N }I+ Height of Location (ft) '-" 2-{) I 

r .... 

t~! P"'-* 3 Pilot Constant .84 Duct Dimensions (in.) SS'' 7. s';\,.; 

~ 

~c..r..... 

Meter Box Number A 11::> Stack Geometry (R or C) (!_, f!..'--ItJ Meter 6H@ 

/.?S~ Assume Moisture (%) II 

C.r-'t:> ~ Yd I ·OOS2- 02 (%) /2-

5~

as·F- K Factor N/Jif C02 (%) 

~-!> 

;J-9·/f'.)D Probe Heater Setting ("F) :2S'o Nitrogen(%) 

- o ·s-o Heater Box Setting ("F) 

~s-o 

Moisture Collected (g) 

~ . /J?"}D tO~~ Final Leak Check 

ltJ,OD~ 

~$''/A 

' 

'" 

Read and Record All Data E :vef] B Mt -------·- ---------

,----- ... ------- --· -- .. 

Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter 

Clock Time Reading Velocity Orifice Temperature Head Pressure Flue Gas Probe Filter (24-hr) vm (ft3) 6P Differential Temperature Temperature Temperature Inlet Outle

(in. H20) 6H (in. H20) c·F> c·FJ c·F> c·F> c·FJ IIS'3 '111. J.-2'Z., CJ ·OU.~ 1 j 3~7 _<.so :J.SD 9s- 9r I9A/. 9o ,..., 0'7 37__/ 2.5.;-- 2~~ JIJ z- 9~LJ titht... 

lJJ~ ';-j, n-, s'7n 2_(;'1t,/ 

~5~ 10'3 _'7_11 

Cfl:j..>., 

9_'1__/, 3o Q_. !2{t:L ~"7__/ 

.:L~o 2l/B loo/ 9G. 2.. a.of.l 373 G.s-o 2..<(9 tOt/ 97 

/a~YJ. 

q~ CJ ·.OS' 

~~9 Zl/<1 2-t/611 

/L).~ q/ 

lloo~ . o~ n.nt/ 

~ltl7 ,2,t:;(J -:::J.tc;"/ lbS" 9'7 

l~oq,? l:J ,., nf./ '"' 2,,j-l.. ll~~ 2-S"o l~s- 'fr /0/2 I ()J} ..v 

0 · olf "":>"10 

L·IJII ~., tl 

().O(J 1'70 

{J • Ot; ') 

~~-tf '-. 1_\' 1'"1 b 

~·"" 

'3"7 6 

~. o<" ~,.., 

.0• 0'{ ;zr. Q 

7 

-~-----

··----- ---------- - -------- -- ----------·· ---- -- ---------

-~---------------·· -------- -·-· - .. ----- --···----
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant AIJ/Jr!}t 

Date II- 5!J -Of, 

Samolina Location :[;zjblRun Number .. r2 

lmolnaer Box.Number 

Recovery Person 

Recovery Rinses 

Samp_lina Identification 

Filter Number ()0l~{).2- r;). '-1 

XAD Number 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution /mplnger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 ,f N {5oy ;ofJ t11L ;Vl G- s 82 '( _q 1J.V. i 

2 ./tJ ;/z)otf !PO m( &-S ¥3 ·~ /32-1 

3 {Wl(Jfj 0 ;#1 &5 Co2 J .s 619.0 

4 ) ~ 1 Jtf J4D~ ;vl&S '132.8 91 '/.? 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) \) ~ ·i 
Facility: Hanson/Monroe Start Time: 1300 

Date: 11/30/2006 End Time: 1400 

Location: Inlet Plant 3 Initial Leak Check: 0.000@5" 

Run Number: R3- Inlet Final Leak Check: 0.000@5" 

Sample Type: HF/HCI 

Total Sampling Time (min) 60.0 

Corrected Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 29.59 

Absolute Stack Pressure (in Hg) 29.55 

Stack Static Pressure (in H20) -0.50 

Average Stack Temperature (°F) 368.63 

Stack Area (sq in) 2375.83 

Actual Meter Volume (cu ft) 34.708 

Average Meter Pressure (in H20) 1.10 

Average Meter Temperature (°F) 101.81 

Moisture Collected (g) 133.80 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 5.0 

Oxygen Concentration (% V) 13.0 

Nitrogen Concentration (% V) 82.0 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 1.0052 

Nozzle Diameter (in) NA 

Pitot Constant 0.84 

Average Sampling Rate (dscfm) 0.542 

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 32.518 

Standard Metered Volume (dscm) 0.921 

Stack Moisture (% V) 16.22 

Mole Fraction Dry Stack Gas 0.838 

Dry Molecular Weight 29.32 

Wet Molecular Weight 27.48 

Stack Gas Velocity (fpm) 1006.85 

Stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 306.89 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 16611.84 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 470.45 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 8757.32 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 248.01 

Percent lsokinetic ERR 

Percent Excess Air 150.04 

Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature (°F) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

A-7 

A-8 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

B-7 

B-8 

Averages 

Hanson/Monroe 

11/30/2006 

Plant 3 

Inlet Run 3 

86 

29.6 

-0.5 

CFDIV 

1300-1400 

Velocity Stack 

HeaddP Ts 

(in H20) (oF) 

0.06 366 

0.06 367 

0.07 371 

0.07 369 

0.06 370 

0.05 367 

0.04 368 

0.03 371 

0.05 365 

0.06 366 

0.07 366 

0.06 367 

0.06 368 

0.06 367 

0.04 366 

0.04 366 

367.50 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Square 

Root of 

dP 

0.24 

0.24 

0.25 

0.26 

0.24 

0.22 

0.20 

0.17 

0.23 

0.24 

0.26 

0.25 

0.25 

0.24 

0.20 

0.20 

0.23 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture (%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area (sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps) 

17.73225 

17.74298 

18.51211 

19.18778 

17.77515 

16.19705 

14.49584 

12.57650 

16.49783 

17.73225 

18.59774 

17.89023 

18.19214 

17.74298 

14.47832 

14.47832 

16.86 

16694.50 

10525.17 

8817.99 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm) 

1063.93492 

1064.57899 

1110.72640 

1151.26683 

1066.50888 

971.82321 

869.75067 

754.58999 

989.86954 

1063.93492 

1115.86435 

1073.41382 

1091.52843 

1064.57899 

868.69922 

868.69922 

1011.86 

13 

5 

82 

16.22 

0.8378 

29.32 

27.483896 

55 

16.49881558526 
An~. 

tY/M~Or£ MC 

FIELD DATA SHEET 

t/.,.IA,.,_,g Ar.-tJir... Plant ---- Probe Length & Type <4' ~/~s Filter Number tJ(,ffiO't -~'5 

Date tl/311/% •• 

~ 

Nozzle ID (in.) "";,. Height of Location (fl) - Zo' ·-i· . San'lpllng .Location_. 

~!o. 

P/,...~3 

Pilot Constant .84 Duct Dimensions (in.) 

.~S'' 

7..5'~.1!? Sample Type .'• r., HF HCL. Meter Box Number 4-TD Stack Geometry (R or C) c. .. Run Number IJ..) -.&-A) Meter aH@ /. ? t!fi' ') Assume Moisture(%) (/ Operator C.r-o '1Z. Yd I. oo-s-z... 02(%) I 3 tr~ 

Ambient Ternperature gc.··£ K Factor pL,_ C02 (%) 5"' Barometric Pressure (in.) ;::z. 9. ~ t:) Probe Heater Setting ("F) 2r-n Nitrogen(%) 

Static Pressure (ln. 

H20) - I!J. s-o Heater Box Setting ("F) 2)1> Moisture Collected (g) 

Initial Leak Check 

~~-(X)(;) ,?c;-•c k, Final Leak Check i?--oe-e s; '1;~, 

. 

____ .• j 

Read 

and Record All Data E B M,· .----.-------.------- :ven 

__ ,______ ,------···· ·--------·--··· 

Sampling Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter V 1 't 0 'fi Time Clock Time Reading e OCI Y Temperature n Ice 

. 

Traverse ( . ) (24_h ) V (fl3) Head Pressure Flue Gas Probe F11ter 

Point mm r m 4P Differential Temperature Temperature Temperature Number Inlet Outle

A 

(in. Hp) "H (in. 

H20) ("F) ("F) ("F) ("F) ("F) 

t 

f 

Jt 

a 1'3 o o I 1.. • I 

~ I D. o~ I . I '3 ~ II "Z. 

~ .o 

z...~ 1:1 q q 9 g 

J 

/~ 

ll._ ._"ls- '1'1. o c...._ 

3.~., Z.S'C'J 

:2.~13 /01::;' 99 

_t_ Z.o.f 

-~ 

'2 /. 3 '7 n. tJI~f( '9"7 I 2/of; 2-w~ /1-1 '" 9 9 

r 1'2-

• 

o~ o, IJ70 3 k 

~ 2..s_o Z..t.j__~ /nt..~_ q 9 

Ia -1 D 

'3D • £, I 6 <Jt~ o 5? t:> 2 'I 'I Z-s-c '/0 /;, 9 9 

? lf!!t 

'"'35 

~q 

• c{ / 0 . o..sra 

~{"' '7 :;.s-D :2-CI {:/ I 0 (" 9 9 

'& "rt• 

~q 

.7'-/ ro.o'r'o 

~/,'B :J.so .21/7 Jos- qq 

c..~ Wao 

I/~. gz.,q 

e./~ 

t!).O~o 

~"7/ 

Z.tf~' 2'1'1 

It:>~ e!Jt:f 

.,1/ ~ ~-- ~ Ji C A.rJf1.. "I~..-- 2 () • ()(, '2 (I u. 'J A· ot.t.. 

7~t., lf n.tJt#l 3CD"7 - If' 6 . Gu1 1111 g 

, 

~. 

0~- :Jr,-r 7 

iA~ HV t o.hf.l 

2,.1,~ 

\. 

--·-·--------- ---------

----

... 

---- -··· ------------------------· ------------------------------------------ --

..... 

------
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant Jl/1 tlrlm fJ 

Date ;/- "J() ~o k 

SamDIIna Location ~ltdRun Number t1 

lmDinaer Box ·Number 

Recovery Person 

Recovery Rinses 

Sampling Identification 

Filter Number Dfo /h tJd. - ~0 

_XA[) tdll ... 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution lmplnger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 I ;;v4f~ f(}tJ 41-1_ )/1_~ €17-.i /3/. I 

2 ,I ,.u l-Iz {or I tJ!J Jtl..~l [r!J ~q.q 7Y:Z, 7 

3 £f'Vll+) {j M&~ ~r9.G &17- 3 

4 5e);e / ;7o /It~ !L1 &-:S b9&'. ~ fJfO. g 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) \) )~~ 
Appendix A.2 

Outlet 
Facility: Hanson/Monroe Start Time: 1027 

Date: 11/30/2006 End Time: 1133 

Location: Outlet Initial Leak Check: 0.002@15" 

Run Number: R1 Final Leak Check: .000@8" 

Sample Type: M5/HF/HCI 

Total Sampling Time (min) 60.0 

Corrected Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 29.70 

Absolute Stack Pressure (in Hg) 29.69 

Stack Static Pressure (in H20) -0.08 

Average Stack Temperature CF) 338.67 

Stack Area (sq in) 2551.76 

Actual Meter Volume ( cu ft) 37.060 

Average Meter Pressure (in H20) 1.27 

Average Meter Temperature CF) 76.63 

Moisture Collected (g) 130.20 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 8.0 

Oxygen Concentration (% V) 13.0 

Nitrogen Concentration (% V) 79.0 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 0.9961 

Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.409 

Pitot Constant 0.84 

Average Sampling Rate (dscfm) 0.603 

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 36.167 

Standard Metered Volume (dscm) 1.024 

Stack Moisture (%V) 14.49 

Mole Fraction Dry Stack Gas 0.855 

Dry Molecular Weight 29.80 

Wet Molecular Weight 28.09 

Stack Gas Velocity (fpm) 1159.83 

Stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 353.52 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 20552.78 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 582.05 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 11528.35 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 326.48 

Percent lsokinetic 101.55 

Percent Excess Air 165.15 

Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant Hanson/Monroe 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature (°F) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

Averages 

11/30/2006 

Plant 3 

Outlet Run 1 

68 

29.74 

-0.08 

GJ 

1Q27-11JJ 

Velocity Stack Square 

HeaddP Ts Root ol 

(in H20) (OF) dP 

0.08 340 0.28 

0.07 339 0.26 

0.07 339 0.26 

0.07 340 0.26 

0.08 338 0.28 

0.07 338 0.26 

0.07 340 0.28 

0.08 338 0.28 

0.08 339 0.30 

0.09 339 0.28 

0.08 337 0.26 

0.07 337 0.25 

0.07 338.67 0.27 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture(%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area (sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps) 

19.87448 

18.57924 

18.57924 

18.59087 

19.84961 

18.56761 

19.87448 

19.84961 

21.06688 

19.86205 

18.55597 

17.88098 

19.26 

20478.84 

13454.48 

11504.93 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm) 

1192.46852 

1114.75451 

1114.75451 

1115.45216 

1190.97642 

1114.05643 

1192.46852 

1190.97642 

1264.01281 

1191.72270 

1113.35791 

1072.85853 

1155.65 

13 

8 

79 

14.49 

0.8551 

29.8 

28.09018 

57 

17.72054606 
Ar~ 

~-

FIELD OA l A. SHEET 

;~ ·-· ·-. Plant 

··--··· ------------- --

___ , 6Ji:---,---------··---··-------- _______ .. __ ..... _____ Probe Length &Type lb ~5 ·Filter Number 

07~'1· d'I,O Date 

tl-30~011 Nozzle ID (in.) .L/01 Height of Location (fl) fiD ' sail,prtng -Location. At. ~...J..I~ J. Pi tot. Constant .84 Duct Dimensions (in.) <57~ Sample Type .... .M5: flcJ.. lfP Meter Box Number A-Tf> Stack Geometry (R or C) C_ .. . -

. I •. /. 8DV. · 

. tl 

Run Number ., Meter t.H@ Assume Moisture (%) Operator t'__;] Yd 

, qq~ I ·' 02 (%) /:::, Ambient Temperature 

~8 

K Factor ,~.,.c, 

. C02 ('Yo) 

~ 

..21.:7¥ .. Barometric Pressure (in.) Probe Heater Setting COF) + 24fZJ Nitrogen(%) 

Static Pressure (ln. H20) -.05 Heater Box Setting (°F) '!.. z~o·· Moisture Collected (g) i 

Initial leak Check J2 .pO ~A)j ') -~f ___ Final Leak Check L>t>o [;) _8!-'------· _· ___ ... __ , 

.-----.------··· 

__________ -~---· 

·-

__ .. ____ --,---- _fJ~d and Record ~IJ Dat<!__qf!!Y.. J Mif!~S------.---·--

__ _ 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A.-' 

< 

Ll 

:1 

2 

rA- Ia 

< 

'1 

.::; 

2 

I 

Sampling 

Time 

(min) 

() 

c; 

tt> 

!5 

Z/) 

2t:; 

:70 

.7S 

"Lib 

C/5 

SD 

55 

(;l5 

Clock Time 

(24-hr) 

110'-t 

A~'1 

....,-v~ 

ll"" v 

iJ33 

Gas Meter 

Reading 

v .. (ft3) 

IRlfl. 7D 

r-g-,~·.oo 

'~,tfi_qo 

~iB. 55 

21. Btl 

~~v: 

<~ CJ 

111' '1 </ 

~~-8, 

'3'1. 0.3 

~1n 

'r1vo~ 

~a 

~'l:f.7S 

ettt,.760 

Velocity 

Head 

t.P 

(in. HPJ 

(Jfl 

,{:Jr; 

,{1 '1 

0~ 

tJR 

• tJ I 

_~_a-z.. 

.6 

-Ol 

a<. z,c 

.6~ 

~.a 1 

Orifice 

Pressure 

Differential 

t.H~(in. H20) 

I~ 3 ~ -r:•" 

i. I j 

l. I R La· 

,_-, fJ.. 

1-1~ 

.35 

,(35 .-5i. 

~ 

t. t 

~ 

Flue Gas Probe 

Temperature I Temperature (of) (of) 

31./0 

2~0 

33G ,;t~j 

3'39 .2..'5) 

3_ 1.[0 26~ 

t33fi .:J.i{) J3S 2.~ I 

~CfD _2_d_j 

3~1f .:J, ~l ,:J(3q ~'50 

3(39_ _;ML_~ 

3!1~ 

~-'{~ 

3o..:J. ..il 5 () ' 

. -+ I 

.. -

Filter 

Temperature 

(of) 

ZYY 

.1 <i-s 

2Yt!J 

2..-SlJ 

_2 'Iff 

2"/~ 

!L~l) 

.2S:?1 

~<t'~ 

.24JJ£. 

.:2fJl 

.:15i 

Dry Gas Meter 

'Temperature 

Inlet 

(Of) 

7Y 

7{4 

7-, 

iq 8lJ 

~0 

~<'?' 

~0 

~ 

"7f7J 

7q 

7CJ 

Outle

("F) 

7/ 

"7'l 

77 

7o/ 

7"

IS 

'7-

7feJ 

il 

77 

?~ 

7G!J 
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant J1.t? lr.f() e 

Date !!.~ )tJ -0 f, 

Samllllna • .. n tJJ/~_) 

Run Number ·. ,. ~ I 

lmDinaer Box Number 

--· .·· 

Recoverv Per8on 

Recoverv Rinses 

Samglina Identification 

Filter Number D 7.26o '-1 -ovo 

XADNlJ .L 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution lmplnger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 ./N YL~"i /DO NtL f{L-s 4 ~0(, 7 2 5 . .2.__ 

2 .ftv tJl~f)y roD J1!VL [,--) ~6.fr 712-1 

3 fYVtfj 0 ;Vl&S b { LJ -~ frJCJ2. '7 

4 ~~('?~' l) K t'V\ l-- /lu.S &~~. q g~:,8. 8 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) I (;O . :b-
Facility: Hanson/Monroe Start Time: 1200 

Date: 11/30/2006 End Time: 1303 

Location: Outlet Initial Leak Check: 0.003@15" 

Run Number: R2 Final Leak Check: .000@5" 

Sample Type: M5/HF/HCI 

Total Sampling Time (min) 60.0 

Corrected Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 29.70 

Absolute Stack Pressure {in Hg) 29.69 

Stack Static Pressure (in H20) -0.08 

Average Stack Temperature CF) 335.75 

Stack Area (sq in) 2551.76 

Actual Meter Volume (cu ft) 39.777 

Average Meter Pressure (in t-120) 1.44 

Average Meter Temperature CF) 75.00 

rv'Joisture_ Collected (g} _. 140.80 - ---- ·-- ·--- ... - ·---

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 6.5 

Oxygen Concentration (% V) 12.0 

Nitrogen Concentration (% V) 81.5 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 0.9961 

Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.409 

Pitot Constant 0.84 

Aver?_ge Sampling Rate (d~cfm) 0.649 . ------ ------ --- ·- -·--

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 38.952 

Standard Metered Volume (dscm) 1.103 

Stack Moisture (%\i) 14.54 

Mole Fraction Dry Stack Gas 0.855 

Dry Molecular Weight 29.52 

Wet Molecular Weight 27.85 

Stack Gas Velocity (fpm) 1231.61 

Stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 375.39 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 21824.77 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 618.08 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 12279.47 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 347.75 

Percent lsokinetic 102.68 

Percent Excess Air 125.89 

Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature (°F) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

Averages 

Hanson/Monroe 

11/30/2006 

Plant3 

Outlet Run 2 

68 

29.74 

-0.08 

CJ 

1200-1303 

Velocity 

HeaddP 

(in H20} 

0.08 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.08 

0.08 

0.08 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.08 

0.08 

Stack 

Ts 

(oF} 

339 

336 

336 

336 

335 

335 

338 

335 

335 

336 

334 

334 

33§,7§ 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Square 

Root of 

dP 

0.28 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.28 

0.28 

0.28 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.28 

0.28 

Q,29 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture(%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area (sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps} 

19.94930 

21.11965 

21.11965 

21.11965 

19.89928 

19.89928 

19.93681 

21.10638 

21.10638 

21.11965 

19.88676 

19.88676 

2Q,§1 

21809.52 

14381.26 

12290.22 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm} 

1196.95804 

1267.17914 

1267.17914 

1267.17914 

1193.95697 

1193.95697 

1196.20848 

1266.38261 

1266.38261 

1267.17914 

1193.20553 

1193.20553 

12JQ,7a 

12 

6.5 

81.5 

14.54 

0.8546 

29.52 

27.844992 

57 

17.72054606165 
-~ 

. ArR/_ 

I Plant !U:77d JVL.l Probe Length ~~~~~------r6 7 /~;;--l-Filter~~mber 

FIELD OAT A. SHEET 

-·----,-------

0 7 J_cc V -tJ<t_j_ Date 

I~~ ..-C6 j_t>l<:>;zz~ l()_(in.} I . '/09 I Height of Location (ft) BDJ sa'ri;pllng.Location. I t>c..Jit.-.J- I Pilot Constant I .84 I Duct Dimensions (in.) ~·7 II 

Sample Type I M~ J.l..t/.... .t-1-fr I Meter Box Number I _f±Tfb I Stack Geometry (R or C) c.. Run Number I 4.,. ' I Meter <1H@ I 1: B 0 '/ Assume Moisture (%) I { Operator I G ;5' I Yd I·· ,_9i_'-_l 02 (%} J;;L AmblentTemperature I ~.B._~ _____ jK_F=a~or_ _ I f,,q C02(%) & '<; Barometric Pressure (in.) I ..1 e; . 1 'f I Probe Heater Setting ("F) I t .2--..in Nitrogen(%} 

Static Pressure (ln. Hp) I -. 0 f3 I Heater Box Setting ("F) I -!.. ..2 '$ 0 Moisture Collected (g) 

Initial Leak Check 

-'"·t!)Q_3_£).-112~J.Final Leak Che;k p~~$;}~ 

____ 

-··-

______

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

~-ec, 

5 ~ _2 

' A~t, 

r--· 

L 

oC 

q 

3 

2. 

[ ___ ----

Sampling 

Time 

(min) 

f> 

5 

_LC> 

t.S 

_2A 

2> 

JO 

_a5 

~.tO 

_L/~ 

;SO 

62 

b() 

...., 

__ ---.--- ____ --,------- _ ----.----f!~nd Record All Data Eve~ $ Minutes_ - -,---.. - -D-;}.-Gas Meter 

Clock Time Temperature 

(24-hr) 

__Ll,/JO 

... n 

II~ 

tOO 

I~A3 

Gas Meter 

Reading 

vm (ft3) 

1(_,:'}l_lJ 

l!fJ() .. 2.0 

~3.-G,O 

e~r98 

~UJ.</5 

"-3~8_ 

fl,iJ.BI 

'71J.oo 

'Jl3. "'" )7,-_ g~ 

~B(J.30 

~83.S2.. 

fJB6. 737 

Velocity 

Head 

<1P 

(in.HzO) 

3~ 

. IJ '1 

"' __.._0~ D3 

_,_()_ ~ 08 

.. Oq 

~ 

~«1 

~ 

.,02:) 

,l) f\ 

Orifice 

Pressure 

Differential 

<1H (in. HzO) 

f.as 

/.6<.. 

/.~2 

:L-.5"2.. 

I·'?.C: .... ,.,.~ 

J.J_.S 

/. 3~ 

I. 1>'< 

ti.-5.l. 

(). 5 l.. 

~ fJS 

i3$ 

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

("F) 

33q 

J3(, 33G, 

-~ sc:r< 

.~-as 

(~a~ 

33~.·· 

..J.a5_ 

3'3Ct, 

3Blf 

3tJ If 

Probe 

Temperature 

("F) 

d--YS: 

~!:LB. 2¥-. 

2-ell 

.!:l 't'G 

~tjd_ 

.z_yq 

256 

-2-- 't Cj 

d'l~ 

.:1'19 

,;2.~-

Filter 

Temperature 

("F) 

2'5 { 

_..2.~() 

.2~{) 

2S_l 

2111 

_..2'5'2. 

.#'5 I 

2<£s:t 

.:2-~~ 

~-6(). 

.:1 

"'~ 

.2~"0 

Inlet 

(oF) 

-7'1 

7_S_ 

7'5 

15_ 

7ft, 77 

~ 

'7/ 

..:lfi 

'1t:t 

,q 7!7-

Outle

("F) 

7<-

7..3 

7t3 

_7_3 

73 

7<.3

_'2_3_ 

7,1 

?C/ 

7_V

7S 

/_"(
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant 41 tJI1. ( () f 

Date (1- JtJ -tf~ 

SamDIIna Location ()u/(of.fRun Number 2 

lmDin_aer Box Number 

Recovtuv Person 

Recove_ry Rinses 

SamDIIna Identification 

Filter Number [) 7J-OO </ -1./ I 

XAD N11nirt111n 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution lmpinger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 .( vJ {/t~D'/ 1

/)o t-t1L )A 6::) r2 '-/. ~ 7)&.~ 

2 t fl) t1z ~tJ Y ;OtJ~t~tL- t-5 :tl.f9 .1- 7 J. /. 'I 

3 ftvtf~J {) ;/1 t-5 C,'LI.c_ t1!0 ' t( 

4 ~~ ~ e_ I J 50 .1/l /., /l&-_5 'oS.(, &9f. 2 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) l t{V I 8 
Facility: Hanson/Monroe Start Time: 1328 

Date: 11/30/2006 End Time: 1432 

Location: Outlet Initial Leak Check: 0.000@10" 

Run Number: R3 Final Leak Check: .000@5" 

Sample Type: M5/HF/HCI 

Total Sampling Time (min) 60.0 

Corrected Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 29.70 

Absolute Stack Pressure (in Hg) 29.69 

Stack Static Pressure (in H20) -0.08 

Average Stack Temperature (°F) 332.58 

Stack Area (sq in) 2551.76 

Actual Meter Volume (cu ft) 40.542 

Average Meter Pressure (in H20) 1.49 

Average Meter Temperature CF) 75.38 

Moisture Collected (g) 148.50 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration (% V) 5.0 

Oxygen Concentration (% V) 13.0 

Nitrogen Concentration (% V) 82.0 

Dry Gas Meter Factor 0.9961 

Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.409 

Pitot Constant 0.84 

Average Sampling Rate (dscfm) 0.661 

Standard Metered Volume (dscf) 39.679 

Standard Metered Volume (dscm) 1.124 

Stack Moisture (% V) 14.98 

Mole Fraction Dry Stack Gas 0.850 

Dry Molecular Weight 29.32 

Wet Molecular Weight 27.62 

Stack Gas Velocity (fpm) 1258.27 

Stack Gas Velocity (mpm) 383.52 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 22297.16 

Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 631.46 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 12530.95 

Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 354.88 

Percent lsokinetic 102.50 

Percent Excess Air 150.04 

Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 

Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 

Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 

Emissions (lb/hr) 0.00 
Volumetric Flow Spreadsheet 

Plant 

Date 

Sampling Location 

Run Number 

Ambient Temperature (°F) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H20) 

Operator 

Time 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

A-1 

A-2 

A-3 

A-4 

A-5 

A-6 

B-1 

B-2 

B-3 

B-4 

B-5 

B-6 

Averages 

Hanson/Monroe 

11/30/2006 

Plant 3 

Outlet Run 3 

68 

29.74 

-0.08 

CJ 

1328-1432 

Velocity 

HeaddP 

(in H20) 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.08 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.09 

0.08 

Stack 

Ts 

(oF) 

333 

333 

333 

334 

333 

330 

330 

333 

333 

333 

333 

333 

332.58 

Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 

Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (scfm) 

Square 

Root of 

dP 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.28 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.30 

0.28 

0.30 

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 

02 Percent 

C02 Percent 

N2 Percent 

Stack Moisture (%) 

Mole Fraction (dry) 

Molecular Weight (dry) 

Molecular Weight (wet) 

Stack ID (in) 

Stack Area ( sq ft) 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fps) 

21.16385 

21.16385 

21.16385 

21.17720 

21.16385 

21.12376 

19.91568 

21.16385 

21.16385 

21.16385 

21.16385 

19.95347 

20.96 

22281.90 

14751.44 

12541.68 

Stack Gas 

Velocity 

(fpm) 

1269.83105 

1269.83105 

1269.83105 

1270.63177 

1269.83105 

1267.42589 

1194.94059 

1269.83105 

1269.83105 

1269.83105 

1269.83105 

1197.20820 

1257.40 

13 

5 

82 

14.98 

0.8502 

29.32 

27.624264 

57 

17.72054606165 
Ar~ 

Plant 

Date 

Safll'pllhg -Location, 

Sample Type ..... ' .. 

Run Number 

Operator 

Ambient Temperature 

Barometric Pressure (in.) 

Static Pressure (in. H20) 

Initial Leak Check · · - , 

Sampling 

Time 

(min) 

'· 

I 

FIELD OAT A SHEET 

f/\01'1 ro~- 1.-)_( -· -·-- ------- -----·------- ----;--r------,--------------- ·--- -·---·-----.---·----------- ·---- L --- .- Probe Length & Type {9 ,;~Ia_~ "l Filter Number ICi1d..flJ.J ~ D t/4 rl-u-o to Nozzle ID (in.) 

. '/oct Height of Location (ft) fj{)' 

0 t,;v\--1 ~-+· Pilot Constant .84 Duct Dimensions (in.) _1{7 ,, 

M~ .lk.l I.J.-1= Meter Box Number A-m Stack Geometry (R or C) ('_ 

~' 

Meter 6H@ f, Bt>t./ Assume Moisture(%) I I 

c..-:s Yd 

,qq~/ 02(%) 1'3 _fiB_ K Factor /(,., 9 C02 (%) .s 

~'i-1'1 

'Probe Heater Setting (°F) t .251) Nitrogen(%) I 

-.DB_ Heater Box Setting (°F) + 

.L~b Moisture Collected (g) tf) 1/ ,f)Cfj- ;:J -;,) I( tJ.IJIJtJ ;tJ Final Leak Check ----

·--·-

Read and Record All Data EvetY_ 6 Minutes 

r------ -----------· 

Dry Gas Meter 

Temperature 

Clock Time 

(24-hr) 

Gas Meter 

Reading 

VmW) 

Velocity 

Head 

6P 

(in.Hp) 

Orifice 

Pressure 

Differential 

6H (in. H20) 

------

tb:kR ll;IS/.£10 aq /.6?.... 

1e~-'l~ ~dq 1- $"2. rm__a ._CflJ !IJ tt ,_ 5'"2. 

1Bfi.21-. .. tJCf ~2. qOO,lt_'-/ " lJ elf ,~-6'2.:: 

I~O<I~ It{ .ll__9_ 1-sz 

tM~~ ,-, I9D"l.6_'- il(f8 /._33 I q tt!' • "'2 o /')q J. 'S<.. 

lq~ ll1 

~"c; 

I. '52. l'fli.60 .tl'Q I· 52. iq.1tJ, ~1 _L £)<; 1-12 

rq.zq.z~ 'll fl f. o5 

_1~ rq.v __ ~tt< 

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(oF) 

~3J 

il3~ 

33..3 

_a_rl_'/_ 

B3~ 

3_3__l) 

(~ ,'7,0 

'333 

213,-:a 

333 

~~ 

333 

--

Probe 

Temperature 

(oF) 

.241£ 

·2V3 

.:J 1/S 

L'f1.t,_ 

-J'I~ 

_2__'£']_ 

~--:-ce-s 

' 2 "''et 

2.,~'(';) 

:z.,:S~ 

.2~ 

.2..SI 

Filter 

Temperature 

(oF) 

OL'Sl_ 

~~-(J 

.2 f7 

_2__'/j 

;J. <tCJ 

~ .. '51 

;2..5~ .:2:-;; ,--_ 

-:L$7 

2_$~ 

.2~<. 

2-$~ 
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHOD 4 

Plant )//()i!l(tlf 

Date ;(- ?o -{),b 

SamDIIna Location ;) vel-! .e / 

Run Number ' .· '~ :J - lmDinaer Bo.X,Number .. --· ., 

Recovery Pef80n 

Recovery Rinses 

SamDJing Identification 

Filter Number () 7 J}O(J Lj - CJf/f/ 

XAD NurnhA• 

Amount of lmpinger Weight 

lmpinger lmpinger Solution lmplnger Tip Final Initial Weight Gain 

Number Solution (g) Configuration (g) (g) (g) 

1 -/(JU t-/-7._ )()o/ ;IJ7J t411[ ;1;1 t-5 8''Lt.L_ "11/ :2 

2 'I tAJ tlz 5oy 1/){)t«l &-5 ~42_.)- 719_{) 

3 £vttl; () ,Miff b (<;; ''f 0/l.t/ 

4 ?~(.::,e_( z£;J ·« L- J1 &- t: qD1.-~ 89/0 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total Weight Gain (g) ['f-t ,( 
Appendix B 

Analytical Report 
Air-Tech Environmental, 

LLC 

3216 S. Alston Ave 

Durham, NC 27713 

Hanson Brick- Monroe #3 

Analytical Report 

(1206-11) 

EPA Method 26A 

Hydrogen chloride 

Hydrogen fluoride 

Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

Phone: (919) 850-4392 I Fax: (919) 850-9012 I www.enthalpy.com 

2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703-5518 
I certify that to the best of my knowledge all analytical data presented in this report: 

• Have been checked for completeness 

• Aie accurate, error-free, and legible 

• Have been conducted in accordance with approved protocol, and that all deviations and analytical 

problems are summarized in the appropriate narrative(s) 

• This analytical report was prepared in Portable Document Format (.PDF) and contains 84 pages. 

QA Review Performed by: Ann L. H. Morris 

Page 2 of84 
Summary of Results 
Company Air-Tech Environmental 

Analyst KEH 

Parameters EPA Method 26A 

# Samples 6 runs 

Client # Hanson Brick 

Job# 1206-11 

PO# Verbal 

Report Date 12/11/2006 

Compound Sample ID I Catch Weight (ug) 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Inlet Run 1 

161,967 

14,969 

Outlet Run 1 

653 

10,530 

Inlet Run 2 

165,838 

15,190 

Outlet Run 2 

986 

13,132 

Page 4 of 84 

1206-11 Results 

Inlet Run 3 

165,027 

15,373 

Outlet Run 3 

639 

13,535 

12/12/2006 
Results 

Page 5 of84 
Company Air-Tech Environmental 

Analyst KEH 

Parameters EPA Method 26A 

# Samples 6 runs 

Client # Hanson Brick 

Job# 1206-11 

PO# Verbal 

Report Date 12/11/2006 

MDL 0.0313 (ug/mL) 

LOQ 0.197 (ug/mL) 

Lower Curve Limit 0.197 (ug/mL) 

Upper Curve Limit 6.87 (ug/mL) 

Compound Hydrogen Fluoride 

Sample LabiD Lab ID Analysis Ret Ret % Diff Cone Cone % Diff 

ID #1 #2 Method Time Time Ret #1 #2 Cone (min) (min) (ug/mL) (ug/mL) 

Avg 

Cone 

(ug/mL) 

Inlet Run 1 022-2801.D 022-2802.D 1206-16S. 2.83 2.81 0.5 3.86 3.86 0.0 _3.86 

DF 

10

I Inlet Run 2 I 023-2901.0 lb23-2902.D I 1206-16S. I 2.83 I 2.81 I 0.7 I 3.61 I 3.60 I 0.0 I 3.61 -1 10

I Inlet Run 3 I 024-3001.D I 024-3002.D I 1206-16S. I 2.83 I 2.81 I 0.7 I 3.46 I 3.42 I 0.6 I 3.44 I 10

I Outlet Run 1 I 025-3101.D I 025-3102.D I 1206-16S. I 2.85 I 2.84 I 0.6 I 1.54 I 1.50 I 1.5 I 1.52 I 1 

I Outlet Run 2 I 026-3401.0 I 026-3402.D I 1206-16S. I 2.96 I 2.98 I 0. 7 I 2.35 I 2.34 I 0.1 I 2.35 I 1 

I Outlet Run 3 I 027-3501.D I 027-3502.D I 1206-16S. I 2.95 I 2.97 I 0.5 I 1.29 I 1.31 I 0.8 I 1.30 I 1 

I H2S04LabBiank I 008-0801.D I 008-0802.D I1206-16S.I NA I NA I NA I 0.0313 I 0.0313 I 0.0 I 0.0313 I 1 

I DIUF H20 Lab Blank I 009-0901.D I 009-0902.D I 1206-16S. I NA I NA I NA I 0.0313 I 0.0313 I 0.0 I 0.0313 I 1 

I MS /Inlet Run 1 I 029-3701.D I 029-3702.D I 1206-16S. I 2.83 I 2.81 I 0.6 I 

Page 6 of 84 

1206-11 Results 

4.99 I 4.99 I o.o I 4.99 I 1 

Spike Am

Native Am

Spike 
Company Air-Tech Environmental 

Analyst KEH 

Parameters EPA Method 26A 

# Samples 6 runs 

Client # Hanson Brick 

Job# 1206-11 

PO# Verbal 

Report Date 12/11/2006 

MDL 0.0421 (ug/mL) 

LOQ 0.383 (ug/mL) 

Lower Curve Limit 0.383 (ug/mL) 

Upper Curve Limit 13.3 (ug/mL) 

Compound Hydrogen Chloride 

Sample .Lab ID Lab ID Analysis Ret Ret % Diff Cone Cone % Diff Time Time #1 #2 ID #1 #2 Method (min) (min) Ret (ug/mL) (ug/mL) Cone 

Inlet Run 1 016-2201.D 016-2202.D 1206-16S. 3.95 3.88 1-8_ '--- 3.56 3.57 0.2 

Avg 

Cone DF 

(ug/mL) 

3.56 10 

I Inlet Run 2 I 017-2301.D I 017-2302.D I 1206-16S. I 3.95 I 3.88 I 1.9 I 3.30 T 3.30 I 0.0 I 3.30 I 10 

I Inlet Run 3 I 018-2401.D I 018-2402.D I 1206-16S. I 3.95 I 3.88 I 1.9 I 3.20 I 3.21 I 0.2 I 3.20 I 10 

r ---olltletRun 1 1 o19-25o1.D 1 o19-25o2.D 1 12o6-16s. 1 3.95 1 3.87 1 2.1 1 2.45 1 2.45 r -o.o 1 2.45 1 1 o 

I Outlet Run 2 I 020-2601.D I 020-2602.D I 1206-16S. I 3.98 I 3.93 I 1.2 I 3.19 I 3.06 I 2.1 I 3.13 I 10 

I Outlet Run 3 I 021-2701.D I 021-2702.D I 1206-16S. I 3.97 I 3.92 I 1.4 I 2.81 I 2.71 I 1.8 I 2.76 I 10 I H2S04 Lab Blank I 008-0B61.b I 008-0802.D I 1206-16S. I 3.89 I 3.80 I 2.4 I 0.0884 I 0.0853 I 1.8 I 0.0868 I 1 

I DIUF H20 Lab Blank I 009-0901.0 I 009-0902.D I 1206-16S. I NA I NA I NA I 0.0421 I 0.0421 I 0.0 I 0.0421 I 1 

I MS I Outlet Run 1 I 028-3601.D I 028-3602.D I 1206-16S. I 3.93 I 3.86 I 1.8 I 

Page 7 of 84 

1206-11 Results 

4.89 I 4.92 I 0.3 I 4.90 I 1 

Spike Am

Native Am

Spike 
Narrative Summary 

Page 8 of84 
Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

Company Air-Tech Environmental Client# Hanson Brick- Monroe #3 

Analyst KEH Job# 1206-11 

Parameters EPA Method 26A PO# Verbal 

#Samples 6nms 

Custody 

Analysis 

Calibration 

Chromatographic 

Conditions 

Report Date December 12,2006 

Bryan Tyler received the samples on 12/1106 after being relinquished by 

Air-Tech Environmental, LLC. The samples were received at ambient 

temperature in good condition. 

Prior to and during analysis, the samples were kept under lock with access 

only to authorized personnel by Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

The samples were analyzed for Hydrogen chloride and Hydrogen fluoride 

using the analytical procedures in EPA Method 26A, Determination of 

Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources Isokinetic 

Method ( 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A). 

The samples were analyzed following the procedures in Section 11.0, 

Analytical Procedures. All samples and standards are prepared, stored, and 

analyzed using high-density polyethylene containers~ 

The Agilent Model 1100, High Performance Liquid Chromatograph 

("Gonzo") was equipped as follows: 

Front: DIONEX ED40 Electrochemical Detector 

Front: Dionex Ion Pac AS14A, 4 x 250 mm (SIN 2243) 

Rear: DIONEX ED40 Electrochemical Detector 

Rear: Dionex Ion Pac AS14A, 4 x 250 mm (SIN 004604) 

The calibration curves are located in the back of this report and referenced in 

the Analysis Method column on the Detailed Results page. 

For each calibration curve used, the first page of the curve contains all 

method specific parameters (i.e., curve type, origin, weight, etc.) used to 

quantify the samples. The calibration curve section also includes a table with 

the Retention Time (RetTime), Level (Lvl), Amount (corresponding units), 

Area, Response Factor (Amt/Area) and the analyte Name. The calibration 

table is used to identify (by retention time) and quantify each target 

compound. 

The acquisition method COLSWTCHM is included in the Curve/QA 

Chromatograms section of this report. 

Page 9 of 84 
QCNotes 

Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

(continued) 

Although Section 7.2.2, Absorbing Solution Blanks, requires client-provided 

reagent blanks to be analyzed, none were provided by the client. A quality 

control check sample was analyzed at the same time as the laboratory blanks 

and samples. Unless otherwise specified, all method required acceptance 

criteria were met. 

All sample preparation and analytical holding times specified in the method 

were met unless otherwise indicated. Section 13.2, Sample Stability, 

specifies an analytical holding time of four weeks. 

Reporting Notes The instrument was set up using two columns of the same type to reduce the 

total time needed to run all the samples. Each sample was analyzed with two 

injections, one injection on each of the columns. 

The H2S04 matrix samples were analyzed for Cl- and F- but are reported 

as HCl and HF. The peaks listed in the "Sample Chromatograms" section are 

labeled hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride. The additional molecular 

weight contribution from the H+ is included in the results listed on each 

chromatogram and throughout the report. 

Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. is accredited to perform this method for compliance 

purposes by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation 

Conference (NELAC) through the Louisiana Environmental Laboratory 

Accreditation Program (LELAP), certificate number 04010. 

Page 10 of 84 
General Reporting Notes 

The following are general reporting notes that are applicable to all Enthalpy Analytical, me. reports, unless 

specifically noted otherwise. 

• The symbol MDL represents the Minimum Detection Limit. Below this value the laboratory cannot 

confnn the presence of the analyte of interest reliably. 

• The symbol LOQ represents the Limit of Quantification. Below this value the laboratory cannot 

quantitate the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method 

• The symbol ND following a value indicates a non-detect or analytical result below the MDL. 

• The symbol J following a value indicates an analytical result between the MDL and the LOQ. A J flag 

indicates that the laboratory can positively identify the analyte of interest as present, but the value should 

be considered an estimate. 

• The symbol E following a value indicates an analytical result exceeding 100% of the highest calibration 

point. 

• The symbol DF represents a Dilution Factor. This number represents dilutions during the extraction 

and/or laboratory stages of sample treatment. The analytical result taken from a laboratory instrument is 

multiplied by the DF to get final results. 

• The Sample ID MS represents a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is spiked with a known 

amount of analyte so that a percent recovery value can be determined. This shows what effect the 

sample matrix may have on the target analyte, i.e. whe1her or not anything in the sample matrix prohibits 

analysis for the analyte(s). 

• The Sample ID MSD represents a Matrix Spike Duplicate. Prepared in the same manner as an MS, the 

use of duplicate matrix spikes allows further confirmation of laboratory quality by showing the 

consistency of results gained by performing the same steps multiple times. Most methods performed by 

Enthalpy do not require analysis of an MSD. 

• The Sample ID BS represents a Blind Spike. A member of the Quality Assurance department has 

created BS samples for many of the analytes Enthalpy tests for, and only QA and the Enthalpy Analytical 

ownership have access to the actual values of these samples. The laboratory analyzes them without 

knowledge of the actual value, and the spreadsheets get completed for these samples solely by the QA 

group. 

• The Sample ID LCS represents a Laboratory Control Sample. Whenever spikes are prepared for our 

clients more spikes are prepared than needed. The extras (randomly chosen) are kept in-house at the 

appropriate temperature conditions. When the spike samples come back from the client for analysis, the 

LCSs (usually two are saved) are analyzed to confirm that the analyte could be recovered from the 

media, separate from the spike samples which were used on the project and which may have had issues 

caused during collection and/or transport. 

• Significant Figures: Where the reported value is much greater than unity (1.00) in the units expressed 

(specifically values of 1,000 or greater), the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 

3 significant figures. For example, a value of 10,456.45 ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug. There are five 

significant digits reported, but no confidence should be placed on more than three significant digits. 

Page 11 of 84 
Sample Custody 

Page 12 of 84 
1-i.ll-1 ~II 

AIIYTICB EnvlroniTHH1t.l, LLC 

P. 0. Box 12353 

R.-rdl Trt.ngle PW'k, NC 77708-2353 

PROJECT A 1 e..._ re_c+r 

SITE 

Chain of Custody Record 

Ul 

a: 

w 

z ;...l_\4 ~~~ B (Ll c... IC::. - {VJ v rJ 12_() f[ # 3 

-~s:;IJB) 

~u-- ~ z 0 Sia (.) 

FIELD SAMPLE I.D. 

JAJ bt t- r2.v rJ I 

tJNhf: ~ 2-

~T~d: 

~3 

I oJQJ- (2.vrJ , 

l.aJ_QJ- -~A) 1-

ld~±M- _e.u_,v_3 

REMARKS 

-c 

SAMPLE MATRIX 

Q.t~ 

Ht.~O 

~ 

w 

RECEIVED BY: I DATE I TIME I nELJNOUISHEo BY: 

DATErrtME 

1 

Li3e:)a~ 

v 

LL 

0 

0 

z 

J~,-l.. 

V1 v 

1./jv-

\./1 .......... 

c.--1 .......... 

..,...,-1v 

...... ' ......... 

_I DATE I TIME I RECEIVED BY. 

AN.ALYS~S 

REMARK

t.j,q. &--

14~2-$" 

~ 

'-f'Q,. '-~-

'111-3

Lfrr.2-

L{kt..(,~ 

RELINQUI¥;1E~ 

I\Vu,~la§~ 

~

l DATE I TIME I 

RELINOUISHEO~e
Hanaon Brlak/Monaure, NC 

Runt f!lltet.l rare 

1 072004=040 0.7125 

2 072004=041 0.7141 

3 072004·044 0.7148 

i ~\ !$-~. ~ODO 

2.. '- <(~. 1"'3.&(:) 

J. :?:, 7 Cf, o"ct3 ~LRtH:::::. 'i ifS~.-Vt uJ !<::.. '6" '-\ • ) .. ."l. '-{ :r-

~215 

Elnal 

0.71Ge 

0.71150 

0.7191 

<!s'(o ~,,..? 

gi. ·~ 2- '{ 

'T'\. C,1-S1 

f'f. 22.$ I 

Net 

0.0071 

0.0019 

0.0043 

)>I~~ 

.oct.flf 

t>ObO 

,'Otlbt.t 

.02.34 

00 ~3 

. 0 I 0 3 
II 

I 

• 

• 

• 

I -

Project Name: 

~scription: 

Date: 

Time: 

%RH: 

Temp: 

100 G 

'l--;UWCL ~JL - /1_.~ I 

---~~~--:~:;.:::~ 

____ ___ ;i -;J·:~- n ; ;; -N _ ~-~~-----------'--··· · _·--"_ ... .,_.-__ '· __ 

7:3o~' !J:;;.:;£../ _ 

f I 

·------- .... __________ _ /CC. C·oc L_ ___ !_'?__z._:_c_!:-'_t:_~---- ___ _ 

1G /, lN!C i../ 

! ----+------·---·--....... -·-

i 

::i- ,.; • I. ' j I .,.-!..'<-·~ ~ 

~-~----- ~~~ ------L9~~~~--------~---------~---------+---------+--------~---------

(J, '7! -1 &, '7'/1G v 

::. ........... ~ t' ") 

__ .. _',' _:_o'_;__c__:i .. : .. ~_:!__L__ ----=:_[__._, _c_'l_:_f~r;_:_l'---l......:....:....'.~---C----------- c. ~ _______ ____; __________ , ____________________ ----- . ','t&, c ..-

:.():..~1 1:.' 3 

u, 7/<13 (; '/ ·1 ,; ,: t.f ·_,C'--4'--<f~-!ll-___.!.____:_ ____ ~'--'...1._:___:____,__ _________ -+-----------"------------'------------------ [, 7 I ~ I ___ _ i y' 

I i I 

--------------11---------'-------------'----------"----------;-------------'----------_:_ __________ _ 

_______ ~-~( {t._../L: -·-~L-- .. ___________________ __,_ ____________________ _c 

----·--- ---- ------------'-------------------------------'--- ____ _:__ ________ __;_ _____ _ 

,i; L~_L ____ '7·9-. _::_~~~'__;_ ,vc;.J;c:)i _ _{]_-':':_c. ~&.~ld __ __:: _ _:_ ____ .. ______ -----------;---------------·-----------.--- - - -· 

;b__ (. '-5: ~ __ _ ___ /._;___ 8 3. I </ J J. i ,)" 3 . I '-/ J ..j 

i ·~ 

,Z:3 Lr ;1'i 71.t '/53 i 7~.(; "lii/S i "' -,------- ---· ------ __:__:__:____:__.-+, -'--~---'--'='---;-------- ----'------+----·------------------

--------·--------------. -· _____ .. _____ - -· 

~-~~-;:::;_~ ____ L'i_}___ /5 ~. ? .) s ~ i ~ +. _ .:;.2 5' J_, --------·----------· __________________________ .. ____ __ 

--------u-------'-------------------------·--------------------·------- --------

-- -----------·-----------

------ -·-------------·---

--·--------------- -----------"------·------·-- ----------------------;.--- -------------·---__ .. -----------

------- ---------·---·--------------- - ------------~----------~-------------~----- ---- ·-- --··-

---·--·--..... ---·----- -------'------------,--------'----------i-·---------·------------ -· -- ........ 

-------·--·-----------....J ··--------r------------r---------c-----------'--------·----------------------- ------ ._, ! 

---------------ll----------+---------i----------~--------:-----------·.L-.. _________ -7--_______ , ___ ..... 

I 
.. -.. --- Name: ~----\ ~ .~~ f f{zP tvu-f' .. ___ _l '~~ 2 I Page 1!l_ ~~-

~.-.- ~ :\: c ·- -· 

1!!1" .. _~,·· 

!;' ~,; . ' .... ""~ . t.(t'i" 

-<-.§"_,-. ·: ·: --

·""'' '. 

nme: I S.}D t?Po ()()" /~tf t 

, '2..-)~ ' 

"RH: g_S' ~ ~¥ g:; %1 

Temp: tot u~ Lo(, &~ '1v 

100G I 00 I 0()()')..-- {t:o.ceb/ (DO, 000"0 'IJ 0. 

ace/ i _i ____________ ---~------~--

tG_ DAqJqq \-ooOO.J i /JDOOI /· ooc:olf l i 

i I 

C--(0 .o7 qq,73tf l.fq.131l/ q.q.12>1J 

lt1'f (/ ~~. '6(32~ {<... ~.:1~ ( :{~.8?:1 r I 

I 

I 

H2- I gLf, ~~(~ ~ '--/ ,"l.:Z--~1 !'(. 1)-Lf) ! 

: 

' 

12-- J-/ f~.3010 ~~-300~ Cf(,. JCOO I 

I 

; 

l13 AJf I /"J.ovtJ,f Jq. o(p'2J _1(1,~ ~ 93 

roc \) /_ 17.K8b9 11. sf~J 77' ~ 8'~ L---

l?'S' I ~1.13JSt) O·Bi 0 ~3. r_360 I 

I 

I 

jX_ / {~c.~CccJ 1(g.'(&;v;: 1 G; .'tb03 I I ; 

''~ .cO~Y ( I 'f. oof{-t.( ; 

2_~ ( ( l(. oo c{J' ; 

' i ; 

_is' I ~/./32-/ ~-?. rj'i-'f I ; I ! ; I ' 

GGs-~ tof55CJo i JD1. 65'1'7' roq.{(1\: ', 

0.6S0 7 If~ ' 14 ~z_.( 1/l:-l;~?.i., I I 

I (/~.6fe"3D 

Sf 3'l I I ( '/.f t.fOO ! 

it'1.11D8 ! 114.1'1°1 ; 

! ' ··-

Sf I ~7 ror C,o~r it9.6 loq 1c9 ~~ eq I 

I ---------·-·-··--·------------

f93 'fg~ i ( 2./. 0717 I 

------- --------- i j.)../.C 75'._3 _£~~~~1 _____________ : . I 

; 'S{J 0 11.cG-J 4-?-- ' ,tlf·'lL-'fl I 

---~------ J('f,q227. ; ------'--------------.------------- -----·------

f?:Jf!JSt 0 

i 

I 1 !3. 07t/.-8 II 'l:J.t'l~8 ; tl ~ elf'/ . I 

-------- I --------------------------------

__?f_J6 ___ i 

: lf~.32?f . JtL3-{S~ ;, \lt..-ncv i -- -~--- -- ·--------- -------- --·--

Sf19 II '.3 86 ( /1&.3.f 11.:, ! 

tll-··~nl ' 

5f!'/ ( I 7. CfL2..c_lf I 1. lf:). ~ 'f 

-- ----------r------------

v i 

'Sf' 2--.0 ! (2-0,J'J'T-S[ J:J.o,l/-OC ~ i 1'2-~- ~lil i i ---- <)y) s ! i /23. a:{3-a I !:J3.Sf;J.'1 ' c/ . 

i ---- ---------------------

0 (~_y_?_{-_ _____ ------ I ' i 

i /(~ 77\ r., , //5,77 :LOi c/ . ,_ _____ _____: __ ----- _,_, .... --- --- -- .- ----------

p, ~ S:l'?.- I 

--------~--

! ( l ~.]_'f&6 ' lf4.3t./-1S i ~I 4 :~ ~ ~~- ---~ _______________________ n h :;-u ' : trY-.919~; /1'/.~1./fs i ,/ 

' ------------------ - -------- ---- -- ----· ---

' I -sP .1-( I 

't2.o·OfG('i~c.cvc.i: v' - -

! l ~(( -:-------;----------------·- -----------;.--- --------

P:>()~v i !63, ·o~ fo3.~80'J l / ----------

' i :) f' 6-(., \ 2...o. oseG, /J.b [~g D I \ 1.-C ,o.:; "(; 0 ; 

! 

! t----------

-- I 

i I 

I 
I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

~pJtqn:. . ... ·'··' 

Date: '7-16 -t> c.f 

Time: ;~:dl> q_.} 

"RH: /Q '1 "'() 

Temp: 7tJ() 

100G joo. ooot/ I 

1G 'j. ()~(){) .;' 

0 '1 :J.OC <./- -6 31 tJ.1t>!O 

-o38 /), {,.!99 

-o3q 0.1~9J> 

-ocfD {)11/:Li./ 

-6¥1 0.1/1./1 

-ofJ; tJ.?tJ q~ 

-ol/-3 o. 1/3J--

--otf-4- (),1/l/9 

·-0 If~ o. 6 Cf3CJ 

-OLf~ o,&gcrt 

-otf? 0' t,J't,? 

·- ol.fg (} I '/ () (o t./ - b~C; tJ~?O/() 

-()50 o. /}~ 3() 

-o~l (),10/3 

-oS;J... 0.11~;;1.-

-os-3 0,1!1/3 

-os-'{- (}. ?~ 1(, 

-DS-5' 0, ?IO;;... 

-D5b !J,&qt;3 

-D~? () .i~s-;;L 

-0 5'"8 0.103/ 

·-0·5''1 0' lo108 

-DC. 6 o. 1/tJ/ 

·- OG I f), ?t ~~ 

-oes. ;)_. tJ. '}oof 

-0£:,3 tJ.~ 9S'£> 

-D~¥ () 115"1 

-0~5"" f) 10 J9 - D(p{p tJ, ?ofRJ- - o&? ~. 7o J! 

-ot.H {) 'l ~' ,:;tI Page /1 

7-:l/-C>l/ tt-J.~ . 6 ~ 

~:t/b ~ I 1~1'5" ~ 

; '" ~ft.e 

1c.f "lc ~D "} ~ 

bf~ 6 g 

;oo. 0()()~ I I I I /() () (}"A (;) l 

I I ()()() 0 I i /. 1aco g i I I 

f), '/0/0 v' 0,1o~t./ 

- 01 (p i'1l1 ./ 0,, 113 - 0. 1oCJ 1 v 

0.1/:ttf v u ?I :l.G 

___-· 

t.· • 1 f-J...-:> 

d, 1/lfO ./ t, 1/J.f~ ,.; 114\ 

/J~ 1o1'5' / 

o. 1131 v 

o. 'lit/ 1 II' 0,?1'/Cf V ,'lfL{~' 

0, ~q3g / 

tO I &8<=t4 ./ 

o. 4>~& 1 V' 

o, ?oi, 3 V' 

D. 1();0 ./ 

o.'7o3o ./ 

0.'1Dt3 / 

(J, 1/foJ.- V' 

{). '1113 ;/ --

0, 7o11 V' 

D. 1toJ- v 

~. ~Cf&J v' 

0. 10'S:l v 

~I 1D3D .,/ 

{J.(;9o8 ,/ 

01 110/ v 

(), 701 c./- V' 

~I 7oo5' v 

() ~ ~g'} \/ 

o. 11'5~ ./ 

o. 10J'1 v 

IJ. 7o{go V' 

0.1011 v 

0 1J. ~ ( v' 
Appendix C 

Meter Calibrations 
Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibrations For: **** FU

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range. &Duo 

2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure. 3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet. 

4) Record readings in outlined boxes below, other columns are automatically calculated. 

DATE: I 1 0/26/06 I 

METER PART#: ATB 

RUN# 

rn 2 3 

[]]

1 

2 

3 

.nfl;~ L.;iJ 3 

[]] 1 1 

DO 8 8 

1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

3 

K' 

FACTOR 

(AVG) 

0.2951 

0.2951 

0.2951 

0.426. 

0.426 

0.426 

0.5876. 

·' 0;5876 .· 

0.5876" 

0.6647 

0.6647 

0.6647 

0.8252 

0.8252 

0.8252 

METER SERIAL #:c==] 

CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#:~ 

TESTED 

VACUUM 

(in Hg) 

23 

23 

23 

21 

21 

21 

19 

19 

19 

18 

18 

18 

36.100 41.210 

41.330 47.300 

47.450 52.700 

59.400 68.200 

68.410 76.400 

76.600 82.900 

2.700 12.350 

12.600 22.800 2~.100 35.600 

83.500 92.400 

92.900 99.900 

0.100 9.000 

EE 

5.110 

5.970 

5.250 

8.800 

7.990 

6.300 

9.650 

10.200 

12.500 

8.900 

7.000 

8.900 

INITIAL FINAL 

29.98 

AVG (Pbarl 

129.981 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.98 

Pressure on 10/27/2006 (in Hg) 29.91 

66.5 73 72 69 70 

66.5 72 72 70 70 

66.5 72 72 70 70 

61.5 61 63 60 61 

62.5 63 65 61 62 

63 65 66 62 63 

65 .. •. 66 69. 65 66 

. 65 j, -69 71 .66 68 

65.5' _;>71 73 68 69 

"• 

64. 67 70 63 64 

64 70 72 64 66 

64.5 72 74 66 67 

I I I I I I 

DGM 

AVG 

71 

71 

71 

61.25 

62.75 

64 

66.5 

68.5 

70.25 

66 

68 

69.75 

29.91 

ELAPSED 

TIME(MIN) 

a 

12.99 

15.13 

13.33 

15.95 

14.45 

11.32 

12.75 

13.42 

16.45 

10.37 

8.15 

10.32 

29.91 

§!j 5 5 ~ 9 . ~ 4 4 

§§ 

5.098

5.956

5.238

8.935

8.089

6.363

9.743

10.260

12.532

8.985

7.040

8.921

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

AV
Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibrations For: Hanson Brick 

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range. 

2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure. 

3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time 

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet. 

4) Record readings in outlined boxes below, other columns are automatically calculated. 

INITIAL 

DATE:I 1215/06 METER SERIAL #:c=J 

CRITICAL ORIFICE SET 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.14 

METER PART#: A TB 

rn 1 2 

K' 

FACTOR 

(AVG) 

0.5876 0.5876 0.5876 

TESTED 

VACUUM 

(in Hg) 

19 32.40 

19 42.00 19 52.30 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS: 

41.80 

52.10 

60.60 

9.40 

10.10 

8.30 

57 57 

57.5 59 58.5 63 

56 59 

63 57 

64: 58 

57 58 

60 

DGM 

AVG 

57.25 59.25 

61.25 

FINAL 

30.14 

ELAPSED 

TIME(MIN) 

0/ 

12.58 13.42 11.01 

 POST C

&O[Jo

AVG (Pba,) 

130.141 

1.85 1.85 1.85 

Pre Test 

O

9.7115 9

10.3945 10

8.5092 8

The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm {std), and the critical 

orifice, V" {std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y:These equations are autoinatlcally calculated in the spreadsheet ·above.". AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

(1) Vm (std) = (2) Vcr (std) = (3) Y= 

K, Vm Pba,+ (t,H/13.6) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions 

Tm K1 = 17.64 'Riin. Hg (English), 0.3858 'Kimm Hg (Metric) 

Pbar 9 

K' --vr::::: 

T m = Absolute DGM avg. temperature ('R- English, 'K- Metric) 

= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions 

T,mb = Absolute ambient temperature ('R- English, 'K- Metric) 

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration 

Vcr (std) = DGM calibration factor 

v.;.(std) 

AVERAGE 

t,H@ = 2

V
.. ·· 

Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibrations For: ATD11-16-06 ** **FU

1) Select three orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range. &Duo 

2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure. 3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet. 

4) Record readings in outlined boxes below, other columns are automatically calculated. 

METER SERIAL #:c=! 

CRITICAL ORIFICE SET 

DATE:I • "--•n I 

METERPART#: 1 --·- 1 

[[] 6 6 

rn 

2 

3 

2 

3 

rn 1 2 3 rn 1 1 

D 

2 

3 

K' TESTED 

FACTOR 'VACUUM 

(AVG) (in Hg) 

0.2951 19 0.2951 19 1 0.2951 19 I 

0.426 18 0.426 18 0.426 18 

0;5876 16 0.5876 16 

. 0;5876 ·16 

0.6647 15 0.6647 15 0.6647 15 

I I I 

74.050 83.250 

83.350 86.750 86.850 92.250 

92.500 98.600 98.700 106.200 

6.400 13;400 

46.700. 52.300 ,· 

52.50"0' 62.550 

62.750 •• 73.850 . 

13.800 25.750 

26.100 34.550 

34.800 41.800 

§ 

9.200 

3.400 

5.400 

6.100 

7.500 7.000 

# 

5.6QO 

10.050 # 11.100 11.950 

8.450 

7.000 

INITIAL 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.92 

60 63 62 61 61 60 62 62 61 62 

60 62 63 61 62 

60.5 63 63 62 62 

61 63 64 62 63 

61.5 64 64 63 63 

61 62 59 58 58 

59 62 63. 60 61 

60 .63 64. 61 61 . 

61.5 64 66 63 63 61.5 63 64 66 67 

61.5 67 67 64 64 

FTrlll 

DGM 

AVG 

61.75 61.75 

62 

62.5 

63 

63.5 

59.25 

61.5 

62.25 

64 65 

65.5 

FINAL 

29.92 

ELAPSED 

TIME(MIN) 

e 

23.67 

8.73 

13.89 

11.03 13.53 12.63 

7.57 

13.55 14.93 14.13 

10.00 

8.28 

AVG (Pbarl 

129.921 

0.49 0.49 

0.49 0.98 0.98 0.98 

9 9 

4 4 

§§ 

9.3232 

3.4455 

5.4697 

6.1803 

7.5914 7.0785 

5. 7221 

10.22411.276

12.114

8.550 

7.0761 

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

AVE
Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibrations For: Hanson Brick 

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range. 

2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure. 

3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time 

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet. 

4) Record readings in outlined boxes below, other columns are automatically calculated. 

INITIAL 

DATE:I ·-·-·-- I METER SERIAL #:c=J 

CRITICAL ORIFICE SET 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.98 

METER PART#: 

[]

1 

2 

3 

.__ ___ ...... 

K" 

FACTOR 

(AVG) 

0.5876 

0.5876 0.5876 

TESTED 

VACUUM 

(in Hg) 

17 59.90 17 67.150 17 74.70 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS: 

66.90 

74.510 

82.10 

7.0 

7.360 

7.40 

62 62 

.· 62.5 64 

-62.5 66 

64 60 

66 61 

67' 62 

61 

62 

64 

DGM 

AVG 

61.75 63.25 64.75 

FINAL 

29.98 

ELAPSED 

TIME(MIN) 

e 

9.37 9.85 9.88 

****POST C

&D [jo 

AVG (Pbarl 

129.981 

9 9 

Pre Test 

7.1325 7.4778 7.4970 

O

777

The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, V m (std), and the critical 

orifice, Va (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet abOve.· AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTO

(1) Vm istd) = (2) V cr (std) = 

(3) Y= 

K, Vm Pba,+ {Ll.H/13.6) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions 

Tm K1 = 17.64 "Riin. Hg (English), 0.3858 "Kimm Hg (Metric) 

Pba,e 

T m = Absolute DGM avg. temperature ("R- English, "K- Metric) 

= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions 

T,mb = Absolute ambient temperature ("R- English, "K- Metric) 

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration 

Vcr (std) = DGM calibration factor 

Vm (std) 

AVERAGE 

Ll.H@ = l

V
Appendix D 

Process Documentation 
'bATE t \ \ - 30-D(Q 

Ho.r.so~r~ Be; ck- fVl onf'<De.. Y la_f"l t 

flctnt.tJ. "3. ES 3Lk L~~·\31 k;\n Th<::~'J ~-?v·\-'iZ..J-e.. 

\-<; \"' C..a.r Vu~hRa.i-~ =: I Ci •. 5 Q.~D / do-.'1 

51 ~e ~ tv\5~"<e·e.-r; Cf~ D'b f'~l"'eeo /c.a..r 

F; re~ WQ_\~ht := 3o '6 ~ Lbs. 
Monroe Plant 3 Stack Test: 11/30/06 

Time: each Inches H20 feet/sec 

15 minutes Pressure Flow 

Test Run #lt1 

Inlet Testing 10:47 0.183 

Start I Finish 11:02 0.248 

10:401 11:40 11:17 0.187 

Outlet Testing 11:32 0.102 

Start I Finish 

10:271 11:33 

Run 1 Average 0.170 W'LJIVIUI 

Test Run #lt2 

Inlet Testing 12:02 0.178 

Start I Finish 12:17 0.180 

11:531 12:53 12:32 0.088 

Outlet Testing 12:47 0.148 

Start I Finish 13:02 0.138 

12:001 13:03 Run 2 Average D.1415 fFOIV/DI 

Test Run #lt3 

Inlet Testing 13:02 0.138 

Start I Finish 13:17 0.175 

13:001 14:00 13:32 0.141 

Outlet Testing 13:47 0.180 

Start I Finish 14:02 0.201 

13:281 14:32 14:17 0.137 
Appendix E 

Example Calculations 
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

• Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68°F, 29.92 "Hg): 

Y X Vm X 528 X [Pbar + (flH /13.6] 

29.92 X (T m + 460} 

• Volume of water vapor at standard conditions: 

= 0.04715 cf/gm X Mw 

• Fractional moisture content in stack gas: 

V m(std} + V w(STD) 

• Mole fraction of dry stack gas: 

• Absolute stack gas pressure: 

p s = pbar + 

Static 

13.6 
• Average molecular weight of stack gas (lb/lb.mole): 

Dry: MWd = (.32 x %02) + (.44 x %C02) + [.28 x {100- (%02 + %C02)}] 

Wet: MW5 = [MWd X {1 - Bws)] + {18 X Bws) 

• Stack gas velocity at stack conditions (fUsee): 

= 85.49 X .84 X '\ft:P X 

Ts + 460 

P5 X MW5 

• Average stack gas volumetric flow at dry, standard conditions (DSCFM): 

528 x P s x 60 sec 

{T5 + 460)x 29.92 min 

• lsokinetic sampling rate(%): 

c = .0945 for English Units 

1% = 

c X vm(std) X ( Ts + 460) 

• Particulate concentration (gr/dscf): 

15.43 grains 

vm(std) 
• Particulate emission rate (lb/hr): 

E = 

7000 grains/lb 

60 min 

X Qsd X 

hr 

• Flue gas concentration of compound of interest (J.Jg/dscf): 

Liquid Samples 

vmstd 

Filter Samples 

vmstd 

• Flue gas mass rate (lb/hr) 

1.32 X 10"7 X Qsd X Ccoi 
Definitions 

~H = average meter orifice pressure (in. H20) 

~p = velocity pressure (in. H20) 

~ = area of nozzle (ft2) 

As = cross sectional area of duct (ft2

) 

Bws = mole fraction of wet gas (unitless) 

cs = particulate concentration (gr/dscf) 

on = diameter of nozzle (in) 

E = emission rate (lb/hr) 

EEOI = mass rate, compound of interest (lb/hr) 

Md = mole fraction of dry gas (unitless) 

MF = mass of filter, post test (g) 

MP = mass of particulate (g) 

Mw = mass of water collected (g) 

MWd = flue gas molecular weight, dry basis (lb/lb-mole) 

MWS = flue gas molecular weight, wet basis (lb/lb-mole) 

Pbar = barometric pressure (in. Hg) 

ps = absolute stack pressure (in. Hg) 

Qsd = flue gas dry volumetric flow @ STP (fe/min) 

Static = stack static pressure (in. H20) 

t = test time (min) 

Tm = average meter temperature (°F) 

Ts = average flue gas temperature (°F) 

IJg/g = laboratory result, analytical concentration of sample 

IJg/ml = laboratory result, analytical concentration of sample 

VA = volume of liquid aliquot analyzed (ml) 

VL = volume of liquid recovery fraction (ml) 

vm = actual meter volume (fe) 

vm(std) = meter volume @ STP (fe) 

vs = flue gas velocity (ft/sec) 

vw = volume of water vapor condensed (ftl) 

y = dry gas meter correction factor (unitless)