alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
HANOVER DIRECT, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

     (In 000's, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               13 WEEKS ENDED
                                                          MARCH 30,       MARCH 29,
                                                            1996            1997
                                                          --------       ---------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>      
Net income (loss) before extraordinary item               $(9,477)       $ (6,621)

Preferred stock dividends                                     (59)            (48)
                                                          -------        --------

Net income (loss) applicable to common
    shareholders                                          $(9,536)       $ (6,669)
                                                          =======        ========

Average shares of common stock
    outstanding during the period                          93,494         144,648

Total shares used to calculate PEPS*                       93,494         144,648

   Primary earnings per share                             $  (.10)       $   (.05)
                                                          =======        ========

Average shares of common stock
    outstanding during the period                          93,494         144,648

Total shares used to calculate FDEPS*                      93,494         144,648

    Fully diluted earnings per share                      $  (.10)       $   (.05)
                                                          =======        ========

Average shares of common stock
    outstanding during the period                          93,494         144,648

    Basic earnings per share                              $  (.10)       $   (.05)
                                                          =======        ========
</TABLE>

--------------------------------------
*Per APB 15, when a net loss is reported, exercise or conversion of stock 
options is not to be assumed.
. ~ 

, I 

" I 

j, 

... .f 

. ;. 

, ".:I~ ') 

"\." ,:,' • 

NRO..APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: 'C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 1 OCTOBER 201,2 . 

.' . ' 

TftP SEeRET ' ct' 

~~~.!Oll&'lDu:.t FOIl mt. Jomt lI. CL.~.xE, DII'J::CTOR 0'2 BtJDqET. 

Pl'tOGlWl AlUaLYSS AIm UAHPOWEtl, CIA 

'. SmlJEcr:, ,PuDd~s for 'Project' FULCr1l1U 

. , ' 

Roferenco ,ourDl'B' 04S~ dated 22 Dec 64, subject 

,as :tbova. 

.. ",,', 

,,'T9P giCREi -::::~:::c:~: ~::!~:~:; D:-:~:!'lt:"':-·':--A':U~"'-O'-' .l1ft-T:'''--' -----i" , o:'\"~ a C'! ~~ ...... 1;" " , AAI ... " .~Cn~IIC:. · ~""!"~:A i.~ ,(iIe'" .. It . , 

:~!) ?Ilt. .52,00.10 DOES, IOf APPLY , I ••• sI'" til .. ~mr.1 ..... " •• ..... t ....... -'"'-~ • .' 'J .... , ..... ,," f""':["" .'. , ' .............. • "'" '1M ""'.'''~ \t~ihh 1I ~,J' .... 

, . 

" 

" " '- ........ ,. ;' 

0' " 

..•.. ' 

, -, .... , . 

'. ~. j 

.;', 

I " 

, 

.. t.,. 'ni4
EXHIBIT (32)



South Street Financial Corp.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of South Street Financial Corp. (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |                            
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | /s/ R. Ronald Swanner      
|.                  |  | R. Ronald Swanner          
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                   | 
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Christopher F. Cranford
|                   |  | Christopher F. Cranford    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report of United
Systems Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report"). I, Thomas E. Gibbs, Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company.


Date: August 15, 2005                          By: /s/ Thomas E. Gibbs
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Thomas E. Gibbs, President
                                                   and Chairman of the Board
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       20
111

•-•

DEPARTMENT OF THE MR FORCE

rN WASHINGTON

r • OFFICE OF THE UNCIER8111CRILTARY

October 1, 1964

1111,103MOYMI FOR Dam DILICTOR CV =MAL ISTSALTMCS DEPOT' SECRWART CF WV=

This samorandat provides some information requested at

eos meting of 29 Septaaber, with sass further background.

ist the so-caned advanced projocts facility (LiP), Lockheed (rtET), under a number of CIA contracts, fabricates dee formai smuctura of the ODO ► orbital vehicle, installs the camera :and Elia systems, end participates in an elaborate test program ut..1.oh tha canna contractor, end other elements of Lockheed =dor contract to the tPcx..ce, also participate.

Ia zilditiota to contracts covering fabrication and test,

2130 bac bad a :. syst.aas ering' contract covering the work

abaat 2ii eaginears at the Ail. The work statomout of this •

CO:1=4;:t cr.lio cut natty engineering tzaks. In grove sumary, these detailed tasks have three objectives: to insure that all atmeLlte of the co -mr • spacaczalt re•eatry vohicia system

lit CATIC-, operate together, to insure that test procedures support

irao objective, and to evainatc test and operating results to wrifcy t....at the objective has be net.

1963 this system enamoring contract sea with

FS 1964, it vas trelAtuthe CIA, as admIniotered by CIA con =actin Generel g=ear's

Cameral Greer bas navatiated with mcs t to czatinue dur-InL FT 1963 fra. wort: covered VT 1964.

The work biz& pi t designatl 'e cru:cos in liar than oystems Pnent,-.Pings• and t. the

eseistcrace of a =UM= wit ii *ver•in systemmzainor.r.......4. The de , parallels

tr.stinz

Lir Luc offillillird ti,"3

wat=er

CORONA
' :**

.....•

...

•

•

,• • . i: 0 . .. • t ;

.4:

this except • tasks Lei: 

sound

by

, proviirloos

fealty in tion raised en

29 SePtamber.

One specific task in the work statement oillillifr

worded substantially as follows:

"Witness acceptance tests of the Associate

Contractors' deliverable end items, participate

in the evaluation of the test data, as required,

and make recanasodaticos thereon to the Clovero•

meat."

In Calera Crease* s proposed follow= contract, as

tosatiuteed with 11190, the last clause in the quote above,

providing for recommandations to the Government, the word

Goverment" has been replaced by "Air Force".

If there is any concern about this task, General Greer and I agree that it can be deleted without damage to the

primary objectives of the contract. Alternatively, the clause

for recennendations can be deleted, or the reformat

to 'AIX Force" changed to 'Goverment".

•

In co section with the question, facility can be used for Cameral Cress's follow-ca it -

should be noted the sine 131SC engineering doing

essentially this same work at VP for amoral years, sometimes

under CIA contract and at other times under Air Farce contract.

Le.t1401

merino: cy 1 - Addressee(DepDir CIA)

a le Director

clr 2 ipro40 BROCKWAY ReMILUdi

ay4'

 5 -

, Barb:awl Raconnalseence Office

CORONA

,..-- :_cooss

111110._13241,( f •
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Ceramic Tile Manufacturing

FROM: Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: July 17, 2007

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

American Marazzi

359 Clay Road

Sunnyvale, TX 75182

PERSON CONTACTED:

Steven Wiederwax

(972) 226-0110

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

To clarify the glaze lines, control devices, and testing feasibility for the American 

Marazzi facility located in Sunnyvale, Texas and the Monarch Ceramic Tile facility 

located in Florence, Alabama.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

American Marazzi- Sunnyvale Facility

Mr. Wiederwax confirmed that there are nine glaze lines--one glaze line goes to one 

baghouse (BP-2C), three glaze lines to another baghouse (CS-1), and the remaining five

glaze lines go to another baghouse (CS-4).

In addition, there are two common stacks at the facility. The first common stack has four 

baghouses venting to it--baghouse CS-1, baghouse CS-4, and two baghouses for the 

seven presses. In all, eight of the nine glaze lines end up venting to this common stack. 

The second common stack has four baghouses venting to it--three are for the body 

preparation processes, and the last is baghouse BP-2C, which also includes the glaze 

preparations. 

Mr. Wiederwax indicated that testing of only the glaze line baghouses is infeasible 

because of all the other processes venting to the common stacks. They would have to 

turn off the other processes to only get glaze line emissions, and it would be impossible 

to run the glaze lines without running the presses and other processes. 
2

Monarch Ceramic Tile- Florence Facility

Mr. Wiederwax confirmed that there are six glaze lines exhausted to three baghouses, 

with two lines venting to each baghouse. 

He also verified that there are other sources exhausting to the baghouse for Press/Glaze 

Line 5 and Press/Glaze Line 6--2 presses and other body preparation processes. 

The other two baghouses also have additional processes being vented to the baghouse 

other than the glaze lines.

Testing only the glaze line baghouses would be infeasible for the same reason as the 

American Marazzi facility--they can’t turn off the other processes that are venting to the 

baghouses.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                   58055   
<SECURITIES>                                                 0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1198542   
<ALLOWANCES>                                             90924   
<INVENTORY>                                             594006   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1913701   
<PP&E>                                                 3720730   
<DEPRECIATION>                                         2052019   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4604830   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  3749317   
<BONDS>                                                      0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0   
<PREFERRED>                                                  0   
<COMMON>                                                 60163   
<OTHER-SE>                                            (132036)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4604830   
<SALES>                                                5446879   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       5446879   
<CGS>                                                  3357968   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          3357968   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       3255997   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      905238   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (248379)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (248379)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0   
<CHANGES>                                                    0   
<NET-INCOME>                                          (248379)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.04)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.04)  
                                                                 
                                               


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.5

                             HA-LO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             5800 WEST TOUHY AVENUE
                                 NILES, IL 60714


                                                   April 10, 2001

Mr. Linden D. Nelson
6180 Wing Lake Road
Bloomfield Hills, MI  48301

Dear Linden:

        This letter is with respect to the Agreement to Purchase Membership
Interest between HA-LO Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation and yourself
(the "Agreement") regarding HA-LO's membership interest in iDentify Licensing
Management, LLC (the "LLC"). As you recall, pursuant to our discussions which
were reflected in my e-mail to you on March 21, 2001, we had earlier agreed that
the closing of the transactions would occur during the week of April 2, 2001
and, at your option, notwithstanding the terms of the Agreement, you would have
had the opportunity to purchase less than all of HA-LO's membership interest in
the LLC.

        This letter, when countersigned below by you, will reflect our revised
understanding that (1) the amendment to the Agreement reflected in the March 21,
2001 e-mail is void and you hereby commit to purchase all of HA-LO's remaining
interest in the LLC; (2) you agree to wire transfer to HA-LO the sum of six
million dollars ($6,000,000) no later than April 20th, 2001, and (3) you agree
to wire transfer to HA-LO the sum of eight million dollars ($8,000,000)
representing the remainder of the purchase price no later than May 16th, 2001.
Upon timely receipt of the full purchase price, HA-LO consents to Comerica Bank
releasing to you the closing documents deposited in escrow with Comerica Bank on
3-20-01.

        Please reflect your agreement by countersigning below.

                                                   Very truly yours,
                                                   HA-LO Industries, Inc.

                                                   /s/ Marc S. Simon
                                                   By: Marc S. Simon
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

AGREED this 10th day of
April, 2001

/s/ LINDEN D. NELSON
-----------------------------
Linden D. Nelson
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Hill, Barth & King LLC Independent Auditors


      We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements  on Form S-8  (Registration  Nos.  333-83146,  333-47851,  333-47843,
333-47059 and  333-46991)  of  FlexiInternational  Software,  Inc. of our report
dated January 22, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relating to
the consolidated financial statements of FlexiInternational  Software,  Inc. and
subsidiary  as of and for the year ended  December 31, 2001.  We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule
of this Form 10-K.

/s/ Hill, Barth & King LLC
Certified Public Accountants

Naples, Florida
March 28, 2003
# C_2005141EN.01000901.xml

| 10.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 June 2005

(2005/C 141/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2239 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4457 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67130 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,201 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5343 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,73 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5743 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,07 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0642 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 175 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,685 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6741 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5946 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5347 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5239 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7165 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0353 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 228,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,3424 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1296 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 780,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6518 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,315 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,819 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,821 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2239

JPY

Japanese yen

131,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4457

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67130

SEK

Swedish krona

9,201

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5343

ISK

Iceland króna

78,73

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5743

CZK

Czech koruna

30,07

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0642

ROL

Romanian leu

36 175

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,685

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6741

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5946

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5347

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5239

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7165

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0353

KRW

South Korean won

1 228,98

ZAR

South African rand

8,3424

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1296

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 780,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6518

PHP

Philippine peso

67,315

RUB

Russian rouble

34,819

THB

Thai baht

49,821

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAMES KENNEY

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (LOWER POTTSGROVE

TOWNSHIP AND DELAWARE VALLEY WORKERS' COMPENSATION TRUST)

PETITION OF: LOWER POTTSGROVE

TOWNSHIP AND DELAWARE VALLEY

WORKERS' COMPENSATION TRUST :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 596 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Colonel, USAF

•

•

T1 SECRET

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF October 16, 1969

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL

SUBJECT: NRP Annex to the STG Report

Attached for your review is a copy of the NRP Annex to the

Space Task Group Report which was transmitted to the President

by Mr. Laird on August 13, 1969 (Tab A). A subsequent review

of the Annex by all five members of the 303 Committee resulted

in its approval being suggested to the President by Dr. Kissinger

with the further recommendation that it not be further disseminated,

even to the principals of the Vice President's Space Task Group

(see Tab B). The President confirmed the objectives of the Annex

in what we consider a very strong indorsement for the continuation

of our Program (see Tab C). The President also approved Dr.

Kissinger's recommendation that the Annex not be further disseminated.

I would appreciate it if, following your review, you would

return this copy for our file.

T

'seismal rs.. AJTOINIT4 It mamas

KO WPC, be 4 110iS .11.011 111,14.1

corn*: op

COPT Cr COPIES

PAN or
# C_2005019EN.01001802.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/18

---

Removal from the register of Case C-230/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 19/41)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 29 October 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-230/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of France.

---

(1)  OJ C 201 of 7.8.2004.

1

---
# C_2005132EN.01003002.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/30

---

Action brought on 2 March 2005 by David Tas against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-124/95)

(2005/C 132/55)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 March 2005 by David Tas, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers,with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Selection Board's decision in competition EPSO/A/4/03 not to admit him to the tests in the competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Selection Board's decision in competition EPSO/A/4/03 not to admit him to the tests in the competition;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who possesses a university diploma of ‘M Sc in Business Administration’, was a candidate in competition EPSO/A/4/03 for the drawing up of a reserve list of assistant administrators at Grade A8 in the auditing sphere. He challenges the Selection Board's decision to exclude him from the competition on the grounds that his university diploma did not satisfy the conditions of the competition notice.

In support of his action, the applicant pleads infringement of the conditions for admission fixed in the competition notice and a manifest error of assessment. He also claims that two other candidates, who were admitted to the competition tests, held the same diploma awarded by the same faculty of the same university and on that basis alleges breach of the principle of equal treatment.

---
*December 4, 1928.*

#### Will of Stoffels: Thurner and others, Appellants, vs. Stoffels and another, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Thos. F. Hayden*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Harvey C. Hartzvig*of Milwaukee.

*By'the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.