alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                         4257000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1729000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   18157000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24959000
<PP&E>                                        35630000
<DEPRECIATION>                                20663000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40898000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         11896000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         91000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    25131000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40898000
<SALES>                                       67854000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              67854000
<CGS>                                         44321000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 44321000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              21405000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               84000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2137000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    876000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1261000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1261000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

Initial setting: This practice applies to land 

areas where depressions, mounds and 

other surface irregularities interfere with 

the application of needed soil and water 

conservation and management practices. 

Where precision land forming is practical 

and needed and suitable soil conditions 

exist.

Start

D.6 (+) Cost of 

materials, 

installation, and 

maintenance

D.2 (+) Runoff 

from area

Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (462)

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

C.3 (-) Biodiversity C.2 (+) Health of humans and 

domestic and wild animals

I.6 (+/-) Quality of surface 

waters and aquatic habitats

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Pathway

D.1 (-) Soil 

organic matter

I.3 (+) 

Land 

values 

I.2 (+) Ability to 

maintain or gain full 

use of all available 

land and/or facilities

I.8 (+) Water 

use 

efficiency

I.9 (+) Crop 

productivity health 

and vigor

I.10 (+) Net 

return

Grade Stabilization Structure (410)

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390)

Filter Strip (393)

Riparian Forest Buffer (391)

Water and Sediment Control Basin 638)

Nutrient Management (590)

I.4 (+) Water yield

C.1 (+) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.1 (-) Soil 

quality

Critical Area Planting (342)

I.7 (+) Vector 

control

1. Reshaped land surface to planned 

grades.

D.4 (+/-) Ponding and 

Surface drainage 

D.5 (-) 

excessive 

subsurface 

water and 

seepage

I.12 (-) Wildlife 

habitat 

I.11 (-) Micro 

topography

CMS

(various practices)

I.5 (+) Contaminants, 

pathogens, sediments to 

receiving waters Stormwater Runoff Control (570)

Structure for Water Control (587)

Associated practice

Dike (356)

Structure for Water Control (587)

Surface Drain, Field Ditch (607)

Drainage Water Management (554)

D.3 (-) Energy 

inputs
#### Rossbach, Assignee, Respondent, vs. Dlouhy, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Aaron L. Weiss,*attorney, and *Virgil L. Blanding*and *Irvimg A. Lore*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Harold M. Baum,*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Retrospettiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, Borivoje Vukadinovic, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   April 3, 2013
 
 
 /s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic
 Borivoje Vukadinovic,
 Principal Executive Officer
 
 
 /s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic
 Borivoje Vukadinovic,
 Principal Financial Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1136 

Relating to the modernization of C–130 aircraft to meet applicable regulations 

of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. SCHUMER, and 

Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

Relating to the modernization of C–130 aircraft to meet 

applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. C–130 FLEET MODERNIZATION. 

4 (a) AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY TO MODERNIZE.— 

5 Congress affirms that, for the purposes of modernizing the 

6 C–130 aircraft fleet, the Air Force has authority to under7 take safety and compliance upgrades in lieu of the C–130 

8 aircraft avionics modernization program of record to meet 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1136 IS

1 applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administra2 tion by 2020. 

3 (b) REPLACEMENT OF LIMITATION.—Section 134 of 

4 the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon National 

5 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public 

6 Law 113–291) is amended by striking subsection (b) and 

7 inserting the following new subsection (b): 

8 ‘‘(b) COORDINATION WITH FAA IN IMPLEMENTA9 TION OF ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM.—If the Secretary of 

10 the Air Force implements in accordance with subsection 

11 (a)(2) the alternative communication, navigation, surveil12 lance, and air traffic management program described in 

13 subsection (a)(1)(B), the Secretary shall coordinate with 

14 the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 

15 in the implementation of such program in order to meet 

16 or otherwise satisfy applicable safety and compliance air17 space regulations.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
National Air Carrier Association 

1000 Wilson Blvd, Suite 1700

Arlington, VA 22209

Ph: (703) 358-8061

Fax: (703) 358-8070

www.naca.cc

July 8, 2011

Mr. James K. Sheppard

Mr. Leo D. Hollis

Air Transportation Division (AFS–200),

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20591

james.k.sheppard@faa.gov

Leo.d.Hollis@faa.gov

Re: NACA Questions On Docket No. FAA–2008–0677

Dear Gentlemen:

In order that we might formulate our comments to the subject document more 

accurately, NACA requests answers to the following questions to clarify the FAA’s intent 

of language at the following sections:

1. Proposed section 121.1257(b)(1) states:

“(b) Initial cadre check airmen: Qualification. To be an initial cadre check airman for a 

part 119 certificate holder and to continue to serve in that capacity for the authorized 

period, a person must meet the following requirements:

(1) Be employed by the part 119 certificate holder.”

Question: Does “employed by” in section (1) mean employee of the part 119 certificate 

holder? 

Note: NACA members routinely “employ” (contract with) Part 142 certificate holders to 

provide training and qualification to initial cadre crewmembers. While the check airmen 

are employed by the Part 119 certificate holder, they are not employees of the part 119 

certificate holder.

2. Proposed section 121.1417(2) states:

 “(2) The person has been supervised for the minimum hours prescribed in the 

 Aircraft Dispatcher QPS for each type of operation (domestic or flag) in which the 

 person serves.”
Question: Is the intended meaning of the proposed language for the parenthetical entry 

“(domestic or flag)” the same as the definitions of “domestic operation” and “flag 

operation” at 14 CFR 119.3?

Note: this question is also relevant to the proposed training and qualification language in 

Appendix T that requires training and qualification for each “Flag Area of Operation.” 

Supplemental carriers (also defined at 119.3) have operating specifications permitting 

certificate holders to operate to most of those areas of operations listed as Flag Areas 

of Operation in the proposal. However, operations to many areas are very infrequent. 

Thus, it is important for NACA to have the terms defined in order to adequately 

comment on the proposed rule.

Thank you for your attention to these questions.

Sincerely,

A. Oakley Brooks

President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6678

WILLIAM THOMAS POPE, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SAM PRUETT, Warden; GENE JOHNSON, Director of Department of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-384-1) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Thomas Pope, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Thomas Pope, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pope has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Pope’s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CALIPER LIFESCIENCES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Kevin Hrusovsky,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge, that:

(1)         TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

(2)         The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|                            | /s/ E. KEVIN  HRUSOVSKY               |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                       | E. Kevin Hrusovsky                    |
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: March 14,  2007 |                                  |

 

----
.2 

.■ 

s_ NRO APHP/ED FOR RELS4E 1 JULY 2015 1 - 

65 38g9 

Policy: , mcgr, 

sup Rims THE SECRETARY OF STATE ••• 

WAsp9iNGTON 

0-1 

05 

to rai-x t11.°st 

11111; 1 R 1965 

Dear Bob: 

As a follow-up to the :July 9 Space Council:- 

.discussion of the MOL project, Harold Brown has sent' 

to'us for comment a proposed memorandum to the 

President and a draft policy'paper setting forth 

suggested information and publicity controls on the 

project. 

It is likely that we will encounter some international problems, perhaps of considerable difficulty 

if the MOL project, as now planned, is carried out. 

I do not consider these problems of sufficient 

negative import to warrant my advising against going 

ahead, and if you are fully satisfied the project 

is justified in terms of the potential contribution 

,to national defense, I have no objection to your 

going forward with the recommendation to the President. 

If a decision is made to proceed with the MOL 

as now conceived, it is clear that very tight control 

of the project operation and very careful handling of 

all publicity will be essential, if we are to succeed 

in safeguarding the sensitive aspects of MOL and 

dealing effectively with whatever international 

problems arise. We have reviewed the draft information: 

policy paper from this, point of view and have worked 

out jointly with your people at the staff level an 

acceptable concept and guidelines. 

The Honorable 

Robert S. McNamara, 

Secretary of Defense., 

• 0. pop „ pe 

? AUG 196$ 

co Der ContNr. X- 4 65 6 
M• ' 

'NRQ APPROVED FOR 

;RELEASE 1 JULY 2016: 

,7 2 

In terms of potential foreign reactions, I 

consider it most important that to the extent it 

can be controlled, everything said.publicly f about 

the MOL project emphasize its experimental and 

research nature, and that statements and implications 

that MOL constitutes a new military operational 

capability in space, or an intermediate step toward' 

such a capability, be rigorously avoided. It would 

be useful to this end if fully knowledgeable people 

in this Department could work closely and coatinuously,-. 

with your own people in devising detailed press and 

publicity handling guidelines, reviewing the texts :of;;`::., 

key statements or releases, etc., and I would 

appreciate confirmation that this is agreeable to 

you, in order that appropriate arrangements can be 

worked out. ;- 

:Sincerely, 

Dean. Rusk `

CEORET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                           8,942
<SECURITIES>                                    38,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,900)
<INVENTORY>                                    136,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,624
<PP&E>                                         177,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                (99,518)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 427,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,845
<BONDS>                                        144,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,006
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   427,243
<SALES>                                        918,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               918,928
<CGS>                                          837,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  904,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,328
<INCOME-TAX>                                       412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       916
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         726,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,784,977
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,397,270)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,475,114
<PP&E>                                         375,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (125,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,751,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,608,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,881,185
<PREFERRED>                                  1,585,948
<COMMON>                                       127,455
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,502,662)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,751,684
<SALES>                                      7,708,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,708,900
<CGS>                                        5,995,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,995,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,926,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             592,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,831,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,831,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,831,025)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,096
<INVENTORY>                                    438,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               604,292
<PP&E>                                       6,064,384
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,883,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 785,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,068,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,674
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,392,742)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   785,334
<SALES>                                        820,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               820,795
<CGS>                                          314,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  781,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   583<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (367,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
<FN>
<F1>FOREIGN CURRENCY LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HelpMate Robotics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                       |   |               |                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 20, 2002 |   |     | /s/ Mark Szporka                                            |
|                       |   |               |    Mark SzporkaChief Financial Officer  |