alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of SGL Carbon AG (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "annual report"), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

       1.     the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


                                                       by: /s/ Robert J. Koehler

                                                               Robert J. Koehler

                                             Chairman of the Board of Management


                                                           by: /s/ Sten Daugaard

                                                                   Sten Daugaard

                                               Member of the Board of Management

Date: June 27, 2007
# C_2005143EN.01004404.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/44

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-470/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 143/84)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 24 February 2005, the President of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-470/04, Thomas Peyker v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 57 of 5.3.2005.

1

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1224 

To reconcile differing Federal approaches to condensate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2015 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reconcile differing Federal approaches to condensate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Condensate Act of 

5 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENT OF DEFINITION OF CONDENSATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy (referred 

8 to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall— 

9 (1) develop a standard definition of the term 

10 ‘‘condensate’’; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1224 IS

1 (2) advise relevant Federal agencies to adopt 

2 that definition for the purpose of clarifying energy 

3 policy in the United States. 

4 (b) OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY ASSESSMENT.—The 

5 Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy may assess the suit6 ability of condensate separately from crude oil for use in 

7 strategic reserves, as determined necessary by the Sec8 retary. 

9 (c) ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION DATA

10 COLLECTION.—The Administrator of the Energy Infor11 mation Administration shall collect data regarding the 

12 chemical properties of condensate and crude oil produced 

13 in the United States. 

14 SEC. 3. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR ASSESSMENTS. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

16 direct the appropriate agencies within the Department of 

17 the Interior to assess condensate separately from crude 

18 oil, in accordance with this section. 

19 (b) OFFICE OF NATURAL RESOURCES REVENUE

20 DATA COLLECTION.—The Director of the Office of Nat21 ural Resources Revenue may collect data regarding con22 densate separately from crude oil produced in the United 

23 States. 

24 (c) BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT.— 

25 The Director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1224 IS

1 may estimate condensate separately from crude oil as part 

2 of the resource assessments regarding geological forma3 tions in the United States. 

4 (d) UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY.—The Di5 rector of the United States Geological Survey may include 

6 estimates of condensate separately from crude oil as part 

7 of the resource assessments regarding geological forma8 tions in the United States. 

9 SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

10 It is the sense of Congress that processed condensate 

11 is a petroleum product. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Gibson Company, Appellant, vs. Brown, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Lloyd D. Mitchell*of Oshkosh.

For the respondent: *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-83/04 (1)

(2005/C 106/44)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

By order of 4 February 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-83/04: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.

----

(1)OJ C 85 of 03.04.2004.

----
i1F-SECIEiN VIA

COI L FEM

.. IMMIUMIPUNIS

-a-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

• WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF 17 March 1976

MEMORMIDUK FOR MRS. STIRLING, DIA

SUBJECT: Accesses for CBO Personnel

This is in response to the requests foD1111111Paccess

by members of the Congressional Budget Office which you

have sent to our office for approval. The Director of

Central Intelligence has determined that CBO personnel

accesses will be approved by the DCI. Secretary Ellsworth

is aware of this policy and will arrange for clarification

to be provided to the CBO if required.

11111111r nwhile, please do not approve any CBO personnel for

— access and please continue to forward all CHO requests

to t s office for approval action.

41o one USAF 1111111111a

Assistant Deputy Director

for DOD and Interagency

Policy

cuuervia41111111/11mismps H GORINAL GEOLIGEMICRTIORICIRMULE OP Tovium- IXICUTIVIE ORM 11011 IIREMPTION CATE- GORY 11110111GJOMPI, Ott IMP M. OL SYSTEM

111111111116222=

COPY Am._ OF COPIES

'PAGE.„1,6_,OF PAGES
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IARl'*·-,. .. _-<·"""":'"-" ..... -----_Y_------

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDE~T . : 

RANDCE vrAl . ,. 

BYEMAN· ~ TALENT .KEYHOlE-COMINf 

axaUMli .lQIIiILI 

BUREAU OF THE BUDGET 

" WASHINGTON. D.C. 20 •. 

Honorable David Packard 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 

washington, D. c.· 

Dear Dave: 

fEB 13 1969 

I have made a preliminary review of·the major programs 

in the Defense intelligence program area based on the 

earlier FY· 1970 Budget d~cisions. I recommend that 

you give the items enclosed your special attention 

in our effort to reduce ~e PY 1970 Budget. 

~ere are ~ree large programs which have high potential savings. Papers are enclosed discussing the 

Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL); the BBXAGON system; 

and ~econnaissance drone procurement. In addition~ 

there are five other itams which I believe you Should inc~de in your review. They are being provided to 

.your staff separately. 

I would be happy to talk to you about these programs 

after you have finished your own review. Mr staff ia 

available to work with your people in developing additional information on these items. 

Sincerely, 

~@/)2?,.. ~ .. Robert 

Director 

'0 Mayo ~ 

Bnclosures 

COROibl UunllU1 

. .,. 

MANDL'E ·'1fl( .. 

BYEMAN .. TALENT .. KEYHOLE..coMINT 

HANDLE 

~otl~ 

VIA 

1lXA1~ 

BYEMAN-COMINT ~ 

CON'lROL SYSTEMS 

1

'1.,· ', .. '1 ~~ . ..,. .. I .. ,. ~ 

. ".. , ~.. 

.. ~.,.~~", 

- BYI-11654-69 

copy ...lA- / 

--

t 

'i.·~ ..
# C_2005110EN.01001801.xml

| 5.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3748 — Mitsubishi Tokyo/UFJ)

(2005/C 110/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3748. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3748. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-NRNHL-17590; PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before January 24, 2015. Pursuant to section 
60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted concerning 
the significance of the nominated properties under the National 
Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be forwarded by United 
States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 20240; 
by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National 
Park Service, 1201 Eye St. NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by 
fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by 
March 2, 2015. Before including your address, phone number, email 
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you 
should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal 
identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. 
While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

    Dated: January 30, 2015.
James Gabbert,
Acting Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic 
Landmarks Program.

COLORADO

Eagle County

Notch Mountain Shelter, Notch Mtn. Summit, White River NF, Minturn, 
15000059
Tigiwon Community House, FSR 707, Holy Cross Dist., White River NF, 
Minturn, 15000060

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia

Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) Historic District, 6900 
Georgia Ave. NW., Washington, 15000061

FLORIDA

Orange County

Gary-Morgan House, 1041 Osceola Ave., Winter Park, 15000062

OKLAHOMA

Kay County

First Church of Christ, Scientist, 300 N. 3rd St., Ponca City, 
15000063
St. John Baptist Church and Rectory, 1009 S. 11th St., Ponca City, 
15000064

Pittsburg County

McAlester Downtown Historic District, Bounded by Business 69, E. 
Carl Albert Pkwy., N. 5th St. & RR tracks, McAlester, 15000065

Tulsa County

First National Bank, 123 E. W.C. Rogers Blvd., Skiatook, 15000066
Oklahoma Iron Works--Bethlehem Supply Company Building, 118 N. 
Lansing Ave., Tulsa, 15000067

[FR Doc. 2015-02995 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

-0324 KALEB EDWARD DANIELS,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 6 2022

10/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0324
"'. Handle via BYEM1\N 

Cuntrol System 

seG 

Tagboard Program Test Support 

The Honorable :Brockway McMillan 

Under Secretary of the Air Force 

Washington, D.C. 

18 March 1965 

Byeman # 23752-65 

1. The IITagboard If program has now progressed in development to the 

launch and recovery phases of test. In response to verbal requests 

tor aas1stance;System.s Comma.nd resources and support have b~n 

allocated to this effort by both the S160$ Systems Division and the 

Western Test Range. I am. confident that the test support requirements" as we understand them, -can be met. 

2. The Pacific Missile Range, as lead range for the Launch and 

Recovery phase of Tagboard, has published a test OperatiOns Directive encompassing tasks assigned to the Systems Command. To assure 

a complete understanding of these assigned tasks, test support :plans 

have been prepared by SSD and AFW'm. I have reviewed these test 

support plans Md consider them adequate. Copies of these plans are 

attached for your review. 

3. The need for streamlined m.a.nagement procedures and security controls are recognized#, but several. aspects of the program management 

are of concern to me: 

a.. Pla.nning on our part is restricted to quick reaction 'Without 

regard to impact on other less~r priority assigned tasks. 

D. Advance planning is precluded by a limited knowledge of ;I., future program requirements and the lack of any specific directi va V 

that permits assessment o:f' the future impact on command resources. 

c. Program sup:port priority is not clearly defined and priority. ;1:( 

guidance is necessary to resolve some potentia.1 scheduling conflicts Vas described in the a.ttached test support p1a.ns. 

~ ,,c( d. No progl"&n deSignator has been assigned for command sup:port v ---- - budgetary and accounting actions. 

e. No information has been provided. from which a n66 support 

fund forecast can be made. 

Page of' L -pages 

CoPY' :l- of3 copies 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115154 
4. I am convinced that appropriate simplified directives could readily 

be passed through cleared .systems Con:n:na.r.d sta.ff eleme:rJ:ts that would 

significantly improve program planning, test support and overall 

management. I solicit your consideration of" directing that this 

minimum documentation be accomplished. 

Sl (:!Nt~r' ...:l~. ,c. } 

B. A. SCHRIEVER 

General, USAF 

Commander 

2 

2 Atchs .,. 

1. Ltr ,SSD, 5 Feb 65". Spacial Frog 

Teet Supp,·w/! .. ;:Mc:1CW 65~SSOR-ll 

2. ~'t..l'.t-.A:FWTR, FebS:pecial Prog _ Test Supp, w/l Atch V-iTC ",.6.5-00 57 

{,.fa { C. I\J ( ( 1../ D r-:: . ..) 

Page 1- of ~ :pages 

Copy I ::L 01 ,3 copies 

_______________ ----=-:A:r:pr:::pr~o_"_v.__.:ed=__for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115154
JOP-SECREr

t.cu.sta 'mut 111110OVIC DOA

DOS NOLffivi 1110C 10 DOI% OW AWOL.

Of

Of

core

'"I

•

•

IMB1141.4116114141 St I •U &

TOP_SEGREr

)6(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF October 3, 1969

Colonel,

NOTE FOR DR. McyIf‘A'S

SUBJECT: NRP Annex to the STG Report

In my note of September 23 (copy attached) I relayed Mr.

Packard's message regarding the 303 Committee's discussion

of our Annex to the STG Report.

Attached, on the right, is a copy of Dr. Kissinger's memorandum to the President on this subject, in which he recommends

Presidential confirmation of our NRP goals, objectives, and

capabilities; and his approval to restrict further dissemination of

the Annex to the STG.

Dr. Kissinger reported on September 30 that the President

had accepted both these recommendations.

1.1111.1111P
MEND FOR

Ai.adede..

Oft !Ai

a741.

Z.

..44 AIRP 44/a4.4144.

"ittif A;s4 4".•

Tiff ger 4,44140.< ee.iee .4e, As.

• *- fACE OF THE DEPOTTO:PY

b

RETARY OF DEFENSE t

PC inufted&f, 40144.ifidt ..4ta At.* &AV, 11.

.ftild .4 4idallik4 4.019,

AlAee /la 107,I •

t

r :1 •

. •

••

"a
;

TOP-SECRET-

)61 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. O.C.

THE NRO STAFF September 23, 1969

NOTE FOR DR. McLUCAS

•

Captain Wilson (in Mr. Packard's office) called me early this

afternoon to relay information on the discussion of two particular

subjects by the 303 Committee during its meeting this morning:

You are aware that we were asked by Mr. Packard on

September 12 to provide a copy of Mr. Laird's letter to the

President and our NRP Annex to the STG report to each of the

members of the 303 Committee for their review. Captain Wilson

stated that the Committee decided this morning that there was no

need to distribute the NRP Annex to the Space Task Group. Dr.

Kissinger indicated that the Vice President will be told that a

briefing of the NRP is available should he wish to hear it. It is

our understanding that we would be asked to present this briefing

should it be requested.

Dr. Kissinger indicated that the President desired some

description of the NRP and the NRO. Mr. Packard has asked Dr.

Tucker to provide to each of the 303 Committee members a copy

of the basic DOD-CIA agreement on the NRP (charter) and a copy

of the document which establishes the NRO as a separate operating

element of the DOD to manage and conduct the Program. Captain

Wilson is preparing a draft of a note which Dr. Tucker will use in

transmitting the copy of these documents to Dr. Kissinger. Dr.

Kissinger apparently will use these documents in discussing the

NRP with the President.

•

S4.1.01111 rum DISSIMIWG

SOS WSW •lt 1400 is SOPS NOS aPPit

•••••• Ns,. • ••••• . • ••••••••••:•••••••••rry•n•n•••77.1•••n.r. yr- •-•,;••••
April 27, 2011

DOE states in its Final Rule that it used an updated version of the CEC test procedure as the basis of the

DOE test procedure. The test results can be found on the “BC Test Results” tab of the Test Data for

Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that the rule will result in repeatable test results for all battery chargers,

including those that use large batteries, because of the requirements that are being added when

selecting a battery to test and from DOE’s experience testing various battery chargers. Again, the test

results can be found on the “BC Test Results” tab of the Test Data for Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that it believes users will opt to use the fastest charge rate

available. DOE included pricing information for regular vs.. fast chargers to show that consumers are

willing to pay more for a faster charger. The data can be found on the “ Fast Chargers Cost” tab of the

Test Data for Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that the “battery weight method” took many iterations. The test results can

be found on the “ Batteries w/o rated capacity” tab of the Test Data for Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that it is difficult to determine when steady state is reached. The graphs can

be found on the “Steady State Difficulties” tab of the Test Data for Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that the vast majority of chargers will finish charging within 19 hours. This

data can about found on the “ Battery Charge Times” tab of the Test Data for Docket excel workbook.

DOE states in its Final Rule that “DOE has consulted with subject matter experts regarding this issue

who believes that lithium

‐ ion batteries will not experience safety issues if discharged to the end

‐ of

‐ discharge voltage of 2.5 V.” The email with the subject matter expert is included.

DOE states in its Final Rule that it has not found products that do not stabilize within 30 minutes. This

data can be found in the BC Standby Tests workbook.

Victor Petrolati

General Engineer

Office of Building Technologies (EE

‐ 2J)

Department of Energy

202

‐ 586

‐ 4549

victor.petrolati@ee.doe.gov
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Ohio - Fiscal Year 2024
# C_2005069EN.01000901.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/9

---

Action brought on 25 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-21/05)

(2005/C 69/19)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 25 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by N. Yerrell and A. Aresu, acting as Agents.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27 November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) (1), or in any event by not communicating the same to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC of 27 November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) (1), or in any event by not communicating the same to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for the transposition of the directive expired on 1 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 302, 1.12.2000, p. 57.

1

---