alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.4.6
                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

     This Termination Agreement is entered into on this 30th day of
April, 2001, by and between Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, with its principal place of business located at 4350 McKinley
Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68112 (hereinafter "Company") and John P. Wilmers of
17566 Baywood Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68130 (hereinafter "Executive").
     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Security
Agreement dated the 26th day of October, 1999, and
     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to terminate and cancel said Agreement.
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of
the parties hereto, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
          1.   That certain Employment Security Agreement entered into between
          the parties on the 26th day of October, 1999, is hereby terminated and
          cancelled effective immediately, and each party is released from any
          and all further obligations thereunder.
          2.   Nothing herein contained shall in any way affect the rights of
          each of the parties under the Employment Agreement entered into on
          January 1, 1997, as amended on October 25, 1999, which shall remain in
          full force and effect.
     DATED at Omaha, Nebraska, this 30th day of April, 2001.


                                            BALLANTYNE OF OMAHA, INC.


                                       By:  /s/ John Wilmers
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          President

                                            /s/ John Wilmers
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Executive
# C_2005031EN.01002902.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/29

---

Action brought on 22 December 2004 by Deutsche Post AG against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-493/04)

(2005/C 31/55)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 December 2004 by Deutsche Post AG, Bonn (Germany), represented by J. Sedemund, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the Commission's Decision of 20 October 2004 (K(2004)4001/3) on the German legal framework governing the provision of postal services, in particular access by private postal service providers and consolidators to the public postal network and the special tariffs connected therewith (BdKEP – Beschränkungen im Bereich der Postvorbereitung (restrictions on postal services); |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the Commission's Decision of 20 October 2004 (K(2004)4001/3) on the German legal framework governing the provision of postal services, in particular access by private postal service providers and consolidators to the public postal network and the special tariffs connected therewith (BdKEP – Beschränkungen im Bereich der Postvorbereitung (restrictions on postal services);

| 2. | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law and main arguments of Deutsche Post AG in the proceedings brought under Article 230(4) EC correspond, with regard to Article 82 EC and the Postal Service Directive 97/67/EC (1), to those of Case T-490/04.

1

---

(1)  Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ L 15, 21.1.1998, p. 14).

1

---
#### Oskins, Appellant, vs. Kenosha Clinic, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha county dated November 7, 1927: E. B. Belden, Judge.

Malpractice. Judgment for the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant: *Calvin Stewart,*attorney, and *W. E. Runge,*of counsel, both of Kenosha.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 18, 1928.
# C_2005082EN.01000301.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-92/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 75/439/EEC - Disposal of waste oils - Priority to processing by regeneration)

(2005/C 82/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-92/03: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 28 February 2003 – Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Caeiros and M. Konstantinidis) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes and M. Lois) supported by: Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski) – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen and J. Klučka, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to give priority to the processing of waste oils by regeneration where the technical, economic and organisational constraints so allow, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of Council Directive 75/439/EEC of 16 June 1975 on the disposal of waste oils, as amended by Council Directive 87/101/EEC of 22 December 1986; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to give priority to the processing of waste oils by regeneration where the technical, economic and organisational constraints so allow, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of Council Directive 75/439/EEC of 16 June 1975 on the disposal of waste oils, as amended by Council Directive 87/101/EEC of 22 December 1986;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.05.2003.

1

---
Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

Conservation Practice Standard Overview May 2016 

Pond Sealing or Lining-Concrete (Code 522) 

Pond sealing or lining is used for a pond or waste 

storage impoundment using reinforced or 

nonreinforced concrete.

Practice Information

The purpose of this practice is to reduce seepage 

losses from water and waste impoundments 

constructed for water conservation and environmental 

protection. 

This practice applies where— 

• In-place natural soils have excessive seepage rates.

• Construction of a compacted soil liner is not feasible with available soils.

• Use of impoundment requires concrete both as a liner and a protective subgrade cover.

Maintenance activities required for this practice consist of those operations necessary to prevent 

and/or repair damage to the concrete liner. This includes, but is not limited to— 

• Visually inspecting liner annually.

• Excluding animals.

• Repairing damage to concrete liner, as necessary. Repairing liner to its original condition.

• Preventing damage from roots of tree and large shrubs by removing such vegetation at first

appearance.

• Preventing and/or repairing rodent damage to concrete subgrade.

Common Associated Practices

Pond Sealing or Lining-Concrete (Code 522) is commonly applied with conservation practices such 

as Irrigation Reservoir (Code 436), Pond (Code 378), Waste Storage Facility (Code 313), and Waste 

Treatment Lagoon (Code 359).

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.

Natural Resources Conservation Service
# C_2005019EN.01002602.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/26

---

Action brought on 8 October 2004 by Henkel KGaA against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-398/04)

(2005/C 19/57)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 October 2004 by Henkel KGaA, Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by C. Osterrieth, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Decision R 771/1999-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 4 August 2004 relating to Community trade mark application No 941 971 and served on the applicant on 9 August 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision R 771/1999-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 4 August 2004 relating to Community trade mark application No 941 971 and served on the applicant on 9 August 2004;

| — | order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | The applicant. |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark in the form of a dual-layered/dual-coloured (red/white) dishwasher tablet with an oval blue centre for goods in Classes 1 (chemicals for use in industry), 3 (soaps etc.) and 21 (sponges etc.) – Application No 941 971. |
| Decision of the examiner: | Refusal to register. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal. |
| Pleas in law: | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1). Misuse of powers. |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

The applicant.

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark in the form of a dual-layered/dual-coloured (red/white) dishwasher tablet with an oval blue centre for goods in Classes 1 (chemicals for use in industry), 3 (soaps etc.) and 21 (sponges etc.) – Application No 941 971.

Decision of the examiner:

Refusal to register.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1). Misuse of powers.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Fishpond Managment (Code 399) 

Fishpond management is the development or improvement

of aquatic habitat and water quality in impounded waters to

produce fish for domestic use or recreation. 

Practice Information 

This practice is applied in warm and cold water ponds,

lakes, and reservoirs that are not managed for commercial

aquaculture purpose. Fishpond management can be used

to improve fish production in almost any pond, lake, or

reservoir where a crop of fish is wanted. The objective is to improve fish production by improving

aquatic habitat and managing water quality. The practice involves increasing food supplies and

decreasing competition from unwanted plants and animals. 

Operation and maintenance of the fishpond is essential for the successful management of the pond,

lake, or reservoir. Activities include evaluation of habitat conditions on a regular basis, management of

fish or other aquatic organism populations, supplemental feeding where applicable, removal of

undesirable and overpopulated organisms, management and control of aquatic vegetation, application

of fertilizer and lime where applicable, and monitoring and maintenance of desired water quality

conditions (e.g., dissolved oxygen, hardness, pH, alkalinity, phytoplankton bloom, etc.). 

Common Associated Practices 

Fishpond management is commonly applied with the conservation practice Pond (378). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
ift •— ''I ... . ...

! - ' • ' ' i

umompows

Col Martin/low \,

fl Weber 1111111

1111110211101131 P02 DIIPUTT DiltliCTOB (21111242C11),

SUBJECT: listion d CIA Penland for Asaloomme to llit0 Ralf

I raise to your Slagged sendestion d Mr. /Oben D. Siegel

far aselpeasat to the IMO an& M. lied is eseteinly veil qualified ..i.,,

foe seek an assigsnest, and is well tbessid al VI permed et fita JIRO staff. .1%

Ct

.1

t

Bewwer, I feel tbat ye already base all al tin fel141se staff ..,

personal sonnitry to seconglisb the deestiess asnissed te tie 311t0 ,.

... etelf by sly 2$ lily MU nsr nikna fee 110 Minn Directors sad . e

..- the Directer, 1110 Stift as the abject et Orpoindien ad ination et .. die IMO. 2 "add seen to cue that we Ann be esacessed net ally ..., with sob el the bust qualified pecnonel bat also v keeping the

fall-time ardisnants to the adeloora villa is wholly ropdred. As ::..i.

we already have three persons as the MO did/ milk osperismee aed .:.i.

lsowledp el itialliT eparalions, I wodd suggest Oat SO addling

...,,

persona el Ibis spot:WO *sad be aesigsed at Ms Das. 4.

N .

t1f

'Si

11

:

Control

Hasa* NM C o w I A 1418

S 713 111_ 7 Copies :.;

t.

pm.

L.1": Cvntrol II

. . n

..t..., ..

.. •

al ewes, nate fell lee "Meth M. Mega old

4111111rapeelfie MO tasks 81111811184 bads weld . I

esadderable same at 110 wet nab* seeenpliabed

is tbis now along the liar el the ad bee group obkh reently eonplated the ovectoll anew d tin electrode ressaneknanee rewire.

nods NBd projects of tbe llatkoal lieesoniesann Program

Issepb V. Cbstyk

Director

-0-1atimal aloses•aum• affin

SA Fie 17-.9

SA FS3 SF
# C_2005031EN.01001402.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/14

---

Action brought on 8 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-505/04)

(2005/C 31/29)

Language of procedure: English

An action against the United Kingdom was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Hans Støvlbæk, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Applicant requests the Court to:

| — | declare that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the recognition of professional qualifications and Council Directives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC, 78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC, 85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor (1) with regard to Gibraltar or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of this Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the recognition of professional qualifications and Council Directives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC, 78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC, 85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor (1) with regard to Gibraltar or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of this Directive;

1

| — | order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 1 January 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 31.7.2001, p. 1

1

---
1 CA USE NO. 14-14 -00568- CR

MARCUS BROOKS, § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

APPELLANT §

§

VS. § 14 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

APPELLEE § AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

CASE NO. 1408106

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

§

VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

§

MARCUS BROOKS § 230 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW MARCUS BROOKS

, app ellant, by and through h is attorney of record,

KURT B. WENTZ, who files this Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Appellant’s Brief and in

support thereof would show th is Court as follows:

I.

The appellant has been found guilty of injury to a child under the age of 15 and sentenced

to 60 years' confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice.

II.

On August 5, 2014 the court reporter’s record was received by th e Court.

The appellant’s brief was originally due on or about September 6, 2014. ACCEPTED

14-14-00568-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/5/2015 10:57:52 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 III.

This Court has granted pr evious requests for an extension of time to file the appellant's

brief and recently ruled that the brief is due July 31, 2015.

IV.

The attorney for the appellant was unable to file the appellant’s brief on July 31, 2015

because early that morning counsel was involved in a n accident causing him to spend several

hours at a local emergency and suffering pain throughout the remainder of the day.

The appellant’s brief is now complete and being contempor aneously filed with this

Motion.

V.

Counsel for the appellant requests that the Court accept the appellant’s brief for filing and

file the appellant’s brief upon approving this motion.

V I

.

This motion is not intended for the purposes of delay but only so that justice may be

done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the a ppellant prays that the Court grant this

motion in all things.

Respectfully submitted,

/ s/Kurt B. Wentz

____________________________ KURT B. WENTZ

5629 Cypress Creek Parkway, Suite 115

Houston, Texas 77069

Phone: 281/587

- 0088

e

- mail: kbsawentz@yahoo.com

State Bar No. 21179300

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Kurt B. Wentz, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was served on

the Assistant District Attorney for Harris Count y , Texas presently handling this c ause on the 5 th

day of August , 2015.

/ s/Kurt B. Wentz

___________________________ KURT B. WENTZ
EXHIBIT
      23.2








**BEARD
      MILLER COMPANY LLP**


Letterhead








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








CN
      Bancorp, Inc.


Glen
      Burnie, Maryland





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No. 333-114355) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-116359, 333-116363 and 333-116380)
      of CN Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 20, 2006 relating to the 2005
      consolidated financial statements of CN Bancorp, Inc., which appears in this
      Form 10-KSB.








/s/
      Beard
      Miller Company LLP





Baltimore,
      Maryland


March
      7,
      2007.
Eric C. Scroggins Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary eric.scroggins@allisontransmission.com

317

- 242

- 7017 ~ direct dial 317

- 503

- 6796 ~ cell 317

- 242

- 5759 ~ fax

P.O. Box 894 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206

- 0894 (317)242

- 5000 www.allisontransmission.com February 4 , 2011

Ms. Gina McCarthy Assistant Administrator Office of Air and Radiation Enviro n mental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D

. C

. 20460

Mr. David L. Strickland Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.W. West Building Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Request for Extension of Comment Period Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and

Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium

- and Heavy

- Duty Engines and Vehicles.” 75 Fed. Reg. 74,152 (November 30, 2010) (“Proposed Rules”).

On Jan uary 25
, 2011
, Allison Transmission, Inc. submitted a request for an extension of the comment period for the proposed rules for “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium

- and Heavy

- Duty Engines and Vehicles.” 75 Fed. Reg. 74,152 (November 30, 2010) (“Proposed Rules”). Based on further discussions with EPA's Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Allison withdraws this request.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eric C. Scroggins
Eric Scroggins
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DESHAWN PRINCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3006

[December 29, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John Joseph Murphy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-

7142CF10A.

Robert David Malove of Law Offices of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L. 

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.