alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before April 13, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA 
                        **Federal Register**
                         Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers, of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on October 17, 2014, Insys Therapeutics, Inc., 2700 Oakmont, Round Rock, Texas 78665 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to manufacture bulk synthetic active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for product development and distribution to its customers. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. Dated: February 5, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-02819 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132923 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132923 

 COA: 263509 
 Wayne CC: 04-003329-02

CHRISTOPHER LEE BLANCHAR REED,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
#### NANCY FOLK, Trustee of S. A. BURNETT v. THOMAS S. HOWARD.

Where a summons was issued * ithin ten days before the term of the Superior Court to which it was returnable: Held, that the action should have been dismissed on the motion of the defendant, and that it was error to order an *alias*returnable to the next ensuing term.

Civil action, tried before *Seymour, J.,*at Pali Term, 1874, CRAVEN Superior Court.

This was an action for the claim and delivery of personal property. It was admitted that the summons was issued on the Saturday next before the Fall Term, 1874, of Craven Superior Court.

The defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the summons was void.

The Court overruled the motion, and ordered an *alias*to issue, returnable to Spring Term. '

From which Judgment the defendant appealed.

All the other facts necessary to an understanding of the case are set out in the opinion of the Court.

*Oreen,*for appellant.

*ClarJi &xíá Roberts,*contra.

*528Settle, J.

A summons in an action for claim and delivery of personal property, was issued on Saturday next before the Fall Term, 1874, of Craven Superior Court, which commenced on Monday.

After the issuing of the summons, the plaintiff made an affidavit and filed an undertaking, as prescribed by law; and thereupon the sheriff was ordered 'to take, and did take the property claimed, into his possession, and afterwards delivered it to the plaintiff.

The sheriff returned, however, that the summons came too late to hand to execute the same ten days prior to the Fall Term of Court.

The defendant moved to dismiss the action, on the ground that the summons was void. The Court denied the motion, and ordered an *alias*to issue, and the defendant appealed. Battle’s Revisal, chap. 10, sec. 2, which is the Act of 1870-’71, chap. 42, enacts that the summons shall command the sheriff' to summon the defendant to appear at the *next ensuiny term*of the Superior Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and shall be dated on the day of its issue. The officer to whom the summons is addressed shall note on it the day of its delivery to him, and shall execute it at least *ten days*before the beginning of the term to which it shall be returnable.

There is no authority given in this Act, as there was in the Revised Code, chap. 31, sec. 50, to make the summons when taken out within the time specified, returnable to the second term next after process issued. And even if there had been, the summons in this case does not profess to follow it. But under neither enactment can we find any warrant for the course which was pursued in this case.

The matter is regulated entirely by statute, and if the law now in force works inconveniently, this is not the tribunal to correct it.

The motion of the defendant should have been granted.

Let it be certified that there is error.

Fee Cueiam. Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50428) pertaining to the registration of $100 million of Onyx Software Corporation common stock, (b) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72235) pertaining to the Onyx Software Corporation 1998 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 1994 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and the 1998 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, (c) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55414) pertaining to the Onyx Software 2001
Nonofficer Employee Stock Compensation Plan, two Stock Option Agreements, each dated January 5, 2001, between Onyx Software Corporation and Kevin Corcoran and the Stock Option Agreement, dated January 30, 2001, between Onyx Software Corporation and
Leslie Rechan, and (d) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-63214) pertaining to the Onyx Software 2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock Compensation Plan; of our report dated January 29, 2002, except for Note 18, as to which the date is February 14,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Onyx Software Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.



|Seattle, Washington |  | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|------------------- |  | -----------------
|March 20, 2003      |  |
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Mark E. Schwarz                                                           |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  | Mark E. Schwarz                                                               |
|                 | Title: | Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer) |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2230 

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue or bust 

of Elie Wiesel for placement in the United States Capitol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. FASO, 

Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. CLARKE of 

New York, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New 

Mexico, Mr. HASTINGS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. KING of 

New York, Mr. COFFMAN, Mr. COOK, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. 

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

KUSTOFF of Tennessee, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. LANCE, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. 

KATKO, Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. MACARTHUR, Miss RICE of New 

York, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. HILL, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. ROTHFUS, 

Mr. REICHERT, Mr. ROYCE of California, and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain 

a statue or bust of Elie Wiesel for placement in the 

United States Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2230 IH

1 SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUE OR BUST OF ELIE 

2 WIESEL IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL. 

3 (a) OBTAINING STATUE OR BUST.—Not later than 

4 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

5 Joint Committee on the Library shall enter into an agree6 ment to obtain a statue or bust of Elie Wiesel, under such 

7 terms and conditions as the Joint Committee considers ap8 propriate consistent with applicable law. The Joint Com9 mittee may authorize the Architect of the Capitol to enter 

10 into the agreement and related contracts required under 

11 this subsection on its behalf, under such terms and condi12 tions as the Joint Committee may require. 

13 (b) PLACEMENT.—The Joint Committee on the Li14 brary shall place the statue or bust obtained under sub15 section (a) in a suitable permanent location in the United 

16 States Capitol. 

17 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

19 necessary to carry out this Act, and any amounts so ap20 propriated shall remain available until expended. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                                   FORM 10-Q

            QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996

                         Commission File Number 0-27290

                                   KSW, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                          11-3191686
(State or other jurisdiction of                   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                    Identification Number)

37-16 23rd Street, Long Island City, New York       11101
 (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)

                                  718-361-6500
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.                   YES X NO _

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

                                                  Outstanding
               Class                              September 30, 1996
   Common stock, $.01 par value                       5,458,004

                           This is page 1 of 4 pages.
<PAGE>
                                   KSW, INC.

                         QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                        QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                             Page No. 
SIGNATURES                                                       3

EXHIBIT 27-FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE                               4
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                   KSW, INC.

Date: January 2, 1997              /s/ Robert Brussel
                                       Robert Brussel
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                   and Duly Authorized Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule (Thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     2,959
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             10,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                 152
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          17,527
<PP&E>                                     1,743
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            22,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     12,102
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      54
<OTHER-SE>                                 9,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              22,063
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          16,664
<CGS>                                     14,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             16,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              141
<INCOME-TAX>                                  48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           93
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  93
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.02


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      99.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with
      the Annual Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period
      ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and
      on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date:  March
      31,
      2006    By: /s/
      Joseph M.
      Cummins


Joseph
      M.
      Cummins


President,
      Chief
      Executive Officer


and
      Chief Financial
      Officer
#### Snyder, Appellant, vs. Ferguson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Grotophorst, Quale ■& Langer*of Baraboo.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 120 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 120

 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to authorize the 
             Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2015

 Mr. Nelson (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to authorize the 
             Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERP, CENTRAL EVERGLADES PLANNING PROJECT, FLORIDA.

    Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (Public 
Law 106-541; 114 Stat. 2680) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(q) CERP, Central Everglades Planning Project, Florida.--
            ``(1) Authorization.--In accordance with subsection (d), 
        the project for environmental restoration, CERP, Central 
        Everglades Planning Project, Florida, is authorized to be 
        carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with 
        the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in the 
        final report of the Chief of Engineers signed on December 23, 
        2014.
            ``(2) Total cost.--The project authorized under paragraph 
        (1) is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary at a total 
        cost of $1,900,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $950,875,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $949,125,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Olson (Margaret), Respondent, vs. McIver, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Sanborn, Lamoreux & Pray*of Ashland.

For the respondent: *Brown, Pradt & Genrich*of Wausau.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on April 5, 1932.
# C_2005050EN.01000501.xml

| 26.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3682 — INTEK/GIM)

(2005/C 50/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3682. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3682. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---