alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 07/07/04 

CASE NUMBER: P04-0692

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 2 

KEYWORDS: SENS MUTA 

 AQUATOX 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT 

FATE: (25EC) > 10 g/L(Analog); VP @25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E); H < 

1.00E-) 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo 

PBT Potential: P2B1T1 

Sorption to soils/sediments = low-moderate 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow-moderate 

HEALTH: Absorbed from the lung, poor absorption from the skin 

and GI tract (pchem). Concern for sensitization and 

mutagenicity from the 

 *CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation) 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L 

(ppm) FOR THE INTENDED PRODUCT WITH ABOUT 13 MOLES OF are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 690.0 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 690.0 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = 690.0 P 

fish chronic value = 70.0 P 

daphnid ChV = 70.0 P 

algal ChV = 170.0 P 

Predictions are based on SARs ; SAR chemical class with 100% 

<1000 and <1% <500; log Kow for with = 0.94 (EPI); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L; 

low concern for toxicity for the intended product 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 1.0 mg/L (ppm) 
Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) FOR 

THE WORST CASE PRODUCT THAT CAN BE MADE UNDER THE CAS NAME WITH 

THREE MOLES OF are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 3.9 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 4.0 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 < 4.0 P 

fish chronic value = 0.400 P 

daphnid ChV = 0.400 P 

algal ChV < 1.0 P 

Predictions are based on SARs for; SAR chemical class =; ; 

log Kow for with = 3.7 (EPI); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as; and TOC <2.0 

mg/L; 

moderate concern for toxicity for the worst case product with 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.040 mg/L (ppm) 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water with CC = 40 ppb 

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2003

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020
#### J. J. LONG, Assignee, v. *W.*T. STEPHENSON.

Before an action can be sustained against an endorser of a draft, it must appear that the same has been presented to the drawee for acceptance or payment, and that due notice has been given to the endorser of its non-accptance or non payment.

*(Hubbard*v. *Tray,*2 Ired. 134; *Benny*v. Pabner, 6 Ired. 623, cited and approved.)

Civil actioN, heard before *Albertson, J.,*at Spring Term, 1874, of NobtiiaMptoN Superior Court.

On the 28th day of January, 1862, one N. M. Long, Jr., gave a sight draft on Col. N. M. Long, for the sum of four hundred dollars, payable to Mrs. M. W. Ransom or order. This draft was transferred *to the*defendant, and by him transferred to the plaintiff.

This action was brought to recover the value of the draft, with damages. The plaintiff alleged that Col. N. M. Long refused to accept or pay the draft, and that defendant on demand, before action was brought, also refused to pay.

The defendant alleged that he had no knowledge of the refusal of N. M. Long to accept or pay the draft, and that he had no notice of the non-acceptance or non-payment of the same until shortly before this action, and that he had reason to believe that the draft was never presented to N. M. Long.

That the draft had been protested and. no notice given of its non payment to the defendant.

The jury returned a verdict subject to the opinion of the Court, as to whether upon the facts the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The Court gave judgment for the defendant, and thereupon the plaintiff appealed.

*12. B. Peebles*and *Oonigland,*for appellant.

*Smith & Strong,*contra,

submitted that the draft must be presented to drawer for payment. 2 Green. Ev., secs. 175, 176; nor is presentment excused by drawer’s death, insolvency, &c. *lb.*sec. 177.

*570Notice of non-payment should be given. 75. sec. 186 ; *Hubbard*v. Troy, 2 Ire., 134.

Insolvency does not excuse. *Denny*v. Palmer, 5 Ire., 623 ; *jLsdoile*v. *Souierby,*11 East., 113 ; 2 Parson Bill and Notes, 446.

It must be in reasonable time. *lb.*506 *et*seq.; 1 Parson Bills and Notes, 377, 381-2.

Settle, J.

The authorities cited by the defendant’s counsel establish beyond controversy:

1. That the draft should have been presented for payment.

2. That notice of non payment should have been given in reasonable time to the defendant.

As both of these essential requisites to the maintenance of this action are wanting, we concur with his Honor that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

mc.mhmm 

-- 

Eonorable 2. F. Ntohey, Jr. - 

County ;.ttorney 

s4ispcr county~ 

Ja.spor, 'I'*xao 

n 

your lottor ra 

over, doea a delinquent 

cf the Gtats of lbxao beoo 

my of San Au. 

before ua ana 

of the Stat0 no 

ea April 6, 1939, 

lan, County Attor 

lmilar queotion 

u&peat in favor 

ltatlon. Vi0 en- 

~*lnlon, wlmh, we think, 

or tha Revised stctuteo, a0 

beoomee dormant under ten (10) 

anx, 113 a. w. (aa) 016. 

te the axhPuatlve bri0i.whloh you 

Your6 very truly 

ATl!ORNliX OEbiiRAL OB TJSXAS
SanitizedManufacturingSystemPhotograph
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. Certification
of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS
Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based
upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the Report): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant. /s/
    A.L. GiannopoulosName:
    
    
    A.L. GiannopoulosDate:
    
    
    May 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13b – 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strayer Education, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Robert S. Silberman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert S. Silberman
Robert S. Silberman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2008

---
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114986 I VI VilloVHillol 

)15'{ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

llil!li1~l!!~llN!llll-,llll!~-,~II!: 

THE NlilO STAFF 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: 303 Committee Actions 

Attached at the right for your information are three 303· 

Committee documents. 

At Tab A is the memorandum from Dr. Kissinger to the 

President on the U-2 issue which contains the recommendation 

that the IDEALIST project be retained in FY 71. 

At Tab B are the minutes of the 303 Committee meeting of 

December 20, 1969, during which the IDEALIST and HEXAGON 

issues were discussed, Approvals for BUMPY ACTION missions 

over South China and the SR-71 mission over North Korea were 

deferred. 

At Tab C are the minutes of the meeting on December 23, 1969. 

BUMPY ACTION missions were to be held off and a joint CIA/DOD 

evaluation of South China intelligence requirements was directed. 

We have been informed by~----~ through~---~ that 

the South China BUMPY ACTION missions and the SR-71 mission for 

North Korea remain "held off" for January. 

JOHN R. MECEDA 

Captain, USAF 

IDEALIST HEXAGON 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET UC:UJfJU Vfll«)MI AUft)iUlft( AtGU(Hk(; 

90. 101l(T1VI Ht0.11 tiffl MOT "P'1.1' 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114986 

COHTIIIOl lltO ______ _ 

C:OFY ___ <>' ___ COPl(S 

,,.., ___ o, ___ ,,ur,
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 15 May 2006         

on the position of the European Community in relation to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on wheels for passenger cars and their trailers

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/363/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (Revised 1958 Agreement) (1), and in particular Article 4(2), second indent, thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The draft Regulation, as contained in document TRANS/WP.29/2005/46, is hereby approved.

Article 2

The Community, represented by the Commission, shall vote in favour of the draft Regulation in the vote which will take place during a meeting of the Administrative Committee at a forthcoming meeting of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations.

Article 3

The draft Regulation shall not be incorporated into the Community type-approval system for motor vehicles.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK            

----

(1)OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

----
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

I

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

1 July 1976

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

SUBJECT:

Reference:

Compliance with Communications Security Policy

Statement for NRP Intelligence Collection Systems

Your memorandum, 10 June 1976, TCS-889338 -76

IRO procedures in the past have been to evaluate the

need for communications security protection on a case-by-case

basis. This has been done for each new system and when block

changes to existing systems were considered. Recommendations

were then presented to the ExCom for approval based on threat

evaluation and fiscal constraints.

This process has resulted in some system configurations

which may not presently be totally in compliance with your

policy statement. Communications security alternatives for

these systems will be presented to the CFI for consideration

on all planned acquisitions after FY 1978.

Any new system developments or block changes will include

communications security measures compliance as pait of the

system design.

Charles W. Cook

Acting Director

•

• ,04

13;

0pTi::;;; i% 3761.

PAGILJ,OP 1 PAGE
Approved for Release: 2022/02/10 C05134209 

H•NOCE _,. 

l6P SEeRET BYEMAN 

CON1"0> SVSTEM 

..J,lil1'NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF September 17, 1971 

,, 

\ ) HANO<E ~I· 

BYEMAN CONTROL SYSH" 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL BRADBURN 0 

DR. NAKA ~ \ 

SUBJECT: Outside Participation in the Review, Analysis 

and Management of NRP Resources 

I understand that Dr. Naka expressed an interest in 

identifying and listing the myriad of outside studies and 

papers which are concerned, at least in part, with the 

management and operation of the NRP. Below is a beginning 

of such a list of on-going or just completed efforts. We 

suggest that this list be passed through the Staff for 

completion of the information and correction of errors or 

omissions on the list. 

Study 

1. Analysis of DOD 

Space Oriented 

Resources 

2. ACP on Ocean 

Surveillance 

QPR-Sponsor 

ODDR&E3. ACP on Tactical ODDR&EWarning and Attack 

Assessment 

4. Satellite and Missile JSIPS-Vogt 

Surveillance Systems (Murphy) 

5. U.S. and Soviet 

Anti-Satellite 

Capabilities 

T9P SEBRET .. c,uoro fROM AUTO~A11C "'CR>O>SG 

Approved for Release: 2022/02/1 0 C05134209"0' '""" 

Status 

On-going 

On-going 

On-going 

On-going 

co•••oc No,_,I,,n,,tc,es,rs,n,,a"-'cl_ 

, I , I 

i 
Approved for Release: 2022/02/10 C05134209 

'f8P SECRET 

6. 

7. 

Improved ELINT 

Support for 

Electronic Warfare 

Defense Science BoardELih"T Resources 

Management 

8. Evaluation of ELINT 

Collection & 

Processing Systems 

ODDR&EDSB-OSD/SA 

(Lehan) 

9. CDIP Review I & II DASD/I 

(71) & (72) 

10. Verification of a 

SALT by Satellite 

Borne Sensors 

11. Cost Model for 

Reconnaissance 

Satellites 

12. U.S. Army Study on 

Satellite Requirements 

ESL-ACDA 

RAND-DASD/1 

I 

rcs/R&D&!JCS/OPS 

μt,/-

On-going 

On-going 

Complete 

Continuing 

Complete 

On-going 

HAROLD S. COYLE, JR. 

Major, USAF 

cc: ss-6 

BYEMAN 'f8P SEBRET nnn noR<env, ,,M ,n M<S •Ot•Pec, 

Approved for Release: 2022/02/10 C05134209 

BYEMAN 

C<>HTROL svsn ..
1111111111 ...

•••n•

0••

ef

7-. 13 .,

-- _ _...... ..

Attachments

Memorandum for Record

Memorandum for Mr.McCone

cc: Secretary of Defenyamge

ialz1 Cmdnd

DOD rm. 5200.10 pas NGT

...01111••••

EYES ONLY

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

OPmccorrmuNockSwourrAmv

June 12, 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

On 23 March, I had asked Dr. Wheelon for a resume of

all CIA studies, excludinOSORO funded, having to do with

the ZTSORP. On 18 April, General Carter acknowledged for

Dr. Wheelon stating it was a good idea and we would get

together after 27 April. On 15 May, I again requested a

meeting during the week of 25 May. In a subsequent conversation with General Carter regarding this and several other

unanswered requests for certain information, the response

was "Why worry about it -- the FIAB is going to straighten

everything out".

In the meantime, both Dr. Fubini and I have had

separate indications that Dr. Wheelon is contracting for

satellite system and sub-system studies with probable

explicit instructions to the contractors not to give the

SDNRO or DDR&E any information regarding the source of the

request for study.

This morning put on a briefing of their study

efforts on overal ite systems plus communications and

photo readout schemes that they are conducting at this time.

(Memorandum for Record attached)

In view of these circumstances, I have taken a calculated

action in writing the attached memorandum to Mr. McCone so

that he may be aware of my rei t • AO n f •• RI tion

.:::::::.....:::' •/".

•

Broc

Director

'*&)National Reconnaissance Office
g

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE OMER EESEETARY

June. 12, 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

11111011111 Dr. Fubini and I receive today by Mr.

o other re resentatives 41111frning in genera

ganization has been

and twp

terms an area of study in which4

engaged. Sub ects of study include

•

Conceptual systems were discussed in general terms. Except

for a few conclusions about attitude control and data transmission,

no specific technical facts were made available.

ed that some of the studies he had described

had been one on coany funds, and he identified the studies on

data transmission as funded under Air Force contracts from Wright

Field. He said that he was not permitted to reveal the source of

funds for the remaining studies and was not permitted to discuss

the results of these studies.

',XCLUDED FRO2

DAD D:B.

••n•••n•

230

m••••

5.10 DCES U0i

..n••••n••• ••••• 
1.: p7

judgment that most of the material outlined by

Mr of direct interest and importance to the (S)

It udgment that a considerable portion of the work

involved duplicates current or past studies funded by the Government and done under the cognizance of the

possible to judge the contribution of th

comparison to the efforts which they poten

ItlikNational Reconnaissance Office

cc - Mr. Vance

Dr. FUbini

It was not

dies in

plicate.

vi

cortral System
4ztit 4` CC'

. —1•• ," 1-42 4*.Clt

- 6 I

.

,„1. ..." .

• a 42464 ?ft.% •••••....4% - • ,.... A. It 4.110, ' WAWA* {Ma W. .0‘ 4 . aig

Or '"r, izz .

. . 

.;.zto,..i..4,, -' uci,s• als
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying amendment to the Annual Report of
Retrospettiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, (the "Report"), I, Borijove Vukadinovic, the Company's Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:    August 14, 2009


/s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic
------------------------
Borivoje Vukadinovic,
Principal Executive Officer


/s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic
------------------------
Borivoje Vukadinovic,
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                           OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               THREE MONTHS        THREE MONTHS           NINE MONTHS            NINE MONTHS
                                                   ENDED              ENDED                 ENDED                   ENDED
                                              SEPT. 30, 2003      SEPT. 30, 2002         SEPT. 30, 2003          SEPT. 30, 2002
                                              --------------      --------------        --------------           --------------

<S>                                        <C>                  <C>                  <C>                   <C>
Net income (loss)                              $ 166,000 000           $ 120,000            $ (37,000)          $ (1,574,000)
                                               ==============      ==============       ==============         ==============


Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic
-------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                         5,470,311           5,470,311            5,470,311              5,470,311
                                               ==============      ==============       ==============         ==============


Income (loss) per common share -
basic                                          $         .03           $     .02            $    (.01)          $       (.29)
                                               ==============      ==============       ==============         ==============

Income (Loss) Per Share - Diluted
---------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                         5,470,311           5,470,311            5,470,311              5,470,311


Effect of stock options dilution                           0                   0                    0                      0
                                               --------------      --------------       --------------         --------------


Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings                       5,470,311           5,470,311            5,470,311              5,470,311
                                               ==============      ==============       ==============         ==============


Income (loss) per common and common
equivalent share-diluted                       $         .03           $     .02            $    (.01)          $       (.29)
                                               ==============      ==============       ==============         ==============

</TABLE>


                                       18
petition for a writ of habeas corpus and releasing Hayes from the 

conditions of lifetime supervision.' Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order. 

Pieffee4u: J. 

Pickering 

J. 

J. 

Saitta 

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court 

Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge 

Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge 

Turco & Draskovich 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

"We note that the district court did not provide findings of fact or 

conclusions of law in its order. To the extent that the district court 

granted relief to Hayes under NRS 176.0931(3), the district court did not 

have the authority to do this, as Hayes did not meet the statutory 

requirements for release from his lifetime supervision sentence. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947.()