alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2154 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

AN ACT 

To rename the Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in Fargo, North Dakota, as the Edward T. Schafer 

Agricultural Research Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2154 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY AGRI2 CULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER IN FARGO, 

3 NORTH DAKOTA AS THE EDWARD T. SCHAFER 

4 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER. 

5 (a) RENAMING.—The Red River Valley Agricultural 

6 Research Center in Fargo, North Dakota, shall hereafter 

7 be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward T. Schafer Agri8 cultural Research Center’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be considered to be a reference to the Edward T. Schafer 

13 Agricultural Research Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedMarch 1, 2006, accompanying the financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreports in the Registration Statements of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31911, effective July 23, 1997; File No. 333-67618, effective August 15, 2001; File No. 333-67626, effective August 15, 2001; andFile No. 333-123616 effective March 28, 2005). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

March 20, 2006
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Alaska - Fiscal Year 2024
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment. 

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

(317) 232-8603 

Thomas W Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner . WWw.idem.IN.gov 

January 4, 2013 

Ms. Susan Hedman 


Regional Administrator 


U.S. EPA, Region V R-19J 


77 West Jackson Boulevard 


Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 


Dear Ms. Hedman: 

Re: Proposed inclusion of Keystone 

Corridor Ground Water· 

Contamination, 

Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana 

National Priorities List 

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is providing this 

letter to convey its support to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. 

EPA) reganding the inclusion of Keystone Corridor Ground Water Contamination on the 

National Priorities List (NPL) of hazardous waste sites. Keystone Corridor Ground Water 

Contamination EPA Identification Number INN000508678, located in Indianapolis, 

Indiana, consists of several municipal wells that have been impacted with elevated levels 

of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), specifically trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, 

and cis 1,2 dichloroethene. The impacted area is bounded by residential subdivisions and 

commercial businesses to the south, east, and north, and Fall Creek to the west. The 

immediate area surrounding the site consists of multiple industrial facilities and residential 

dwellings. The source of the VOCs has not been fully identified at this point in time. 

Citizens Water Company is currently monitoring the contamination in their well field. 

This site qualifies for inclusion on the NPL as: 

1) 	the site meets the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP) criteria for listing on the NPL as the site scores 

sufficiently high pursuant to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS); and 

2) the site requires a long-term response action. 

An NPL listing would allow for the proper and timely investigation of the nature and 

extent of VOG contamination to the residential area and to determine the cleanup 

alternatives to the impacted areas and thereby protect the public health and well-being of 

Recycled Paper ® 	 An Equal Opportullity Employer 
asterly 

Ms. Susan Headman 

Regional Administrator 

January 4, 2013 

Page 2 of 2 

the area consumers. The NPL listing appears to be the only viable alternative for 

addressing the existing environmental problems. 

As the Commissioner of the IDEM, I am authorized by Indiana Governor Mitchell 

E. Daniels to act in these matters on his behalf. I have considered my staff's 

recommendations and I fully support the designation of Keystone Corridor Ground Water 

Contamination for inclusion on the NPl. I request that the U.S. EPA assign a Remedial 

Project Manager and/or On-Scene Coordinator to implement the process. If you require 

any additional information or have any questions, please contact Mark Jaworski of the 

Site Investigation Section at 317/233-2407. 

Sincere , I 

/ 

Commissioner 

cc: Denise Boone, U.S. EPA 

Nuria Muniz, U.S. EPA
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            58,219
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    634,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      236,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,547,841
<PP&E>                                           623,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,101,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,238,734
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            163,352
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,665
<OTHER-SE>                                      (306,647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,101,004
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,016,935
<CGS>                                          1,718,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,591,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               261,412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,555,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       3,266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,558,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,558,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        



</TABLE>
# C_2005110EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 May 2005

(2005/C 110/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2953 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68175 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1718 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5410 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,95 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1115 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5808 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,148 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1950 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 231 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,48 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,890 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7534 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6652 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6176 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0920 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7712 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1181 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 294,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8145 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7206 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 318,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,922 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,043 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,138 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2953

JPY

Japanese yen

135,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68175

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1718

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5410

ISK

Iceland króna

82,95

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1115

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5808

CZK

Czech koruna

30,148

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1950

ROL

Romanian leu

36 231

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,48

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,890

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7534

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6652

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6176

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0920

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7712

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1181

KRW

South Korean won

1 294,91

ZAR

South African rand

7,8145

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7206

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 318,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,922

PHP

Philippine peso

70,043

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9950

THB

Thai baht

51,138

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
I 

I 

1 

I 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140956, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORC 

WASHINGTON 20330 

July 13, 1973 

111110111111111111111ii I\IQ~l~l!IDn11rn11111111111 

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR OF LEGISLATIVE LIAISON 

(MAJ GEN BOSWELL) 

DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION (MAJ GEN GINSBURGH) 

DIRECTOR OF BUDGET (MAJ GEN DeLUCA) 

SUBJECT: Review of Congressional Statements and Testimony 

Some recent events have occurred which have caused 

concern that the security and policy review of Congressional 

Statements and Testimony is not sufficiently sensitive to 

national policy regarding space activities. In order to 

preclude the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information 

involving space programs, I would like for my Staff to have 

the opportunity to review prepared statements prior to their 

presentation to Congress and also the resulting testimony 

prior to printing it in the Congressional Record. The subject 

areas of interest include all matters pertaining to space with 

particular emphasis on space systems, boosters, satellites and 

space shuttle efforts. I 

I would appreciate it if you would identify someone from 

your office whom we can contact to arrange for initiating this 

review process. 

I would be glad to discuss this further should you wish; 

however, I would appreciate your support at this time. 

• KU 

Brigadier 

Director 

Office of Space Systems 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140956
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      279
<ALLOWANCES>                                       176
<INVENTORY>                                         32
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,381
<PP&E>                                           1,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,636
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,557
<SALES>                                            170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   170
<CGS>                                               40
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       40
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004320EN.01002702.xml

| 24.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3606 — SIEMENS/BONUS ENERGY)

(2004/C 320/16)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3606. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3606. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLES DORNS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4684

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Jean-Jacques A. Darius, Assistant

Public Defender, (withdrew after briefing)

Bartow; Jeremy S. Clark of Clark Law, 

Saint Petersburg (substituted as counsel

of record), for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee; Wendy Buffington and Cynthia 

Richards (substituted as counsel of record), 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
• t.•: • • '• "! )LE VIA -T-AILYIT=Krill02

CHANNELS ONLY

POL -A -4

7 July1967 POL-A -5

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: Disclosure of "the fact of" Satellite Reconnaissance

This most welcome and entirely unexpected memorandum arrived

today. The DIA had processed the USD3's disclosure proposal through

the JCS as a me morandum; General Wheeler had initialed it; it went

to Mr. licNamera; one hour later it was back with his non-concurrence.

Safe for 1967!

PAA_. RTHMAN

Colonel, USAF

HANDLE VIA TAtzewr-leameLs--

CHANNELS ONLY

rJi
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 18 April 2006         

amending Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration that certain regions of Italy are officially free of bovine tuberculosis and enzootic bovine leukosis and that Slovakia is officially free of enzootic bovine leukosis

(notified under document number C(2006) 1551)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/290/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), and in particular Annex A(I)(4) and Annex D(I)(E) thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annexes I and III to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 (OJ L 3, 5.1.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 74. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/169/EC (OJ L 57, 28.2.2006, p. 35.)

----

ANNEX

Annexes I and III to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended as follows:

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. McAree, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



By:

/s/ PETER F. MCAREE Peter F. McAree Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date:
March 13, 2009

---



QuickLinks
# C_2005006EN.01003501.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/35

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 October 2004

in Case T-76/03 Herbert Meister against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Officials - Reassignment of a head of service - Interest of the service - Equivalence of posts - Right to freedom of expression - Duty to have regard for the interests of officials - Statement of reasons - Right to be heard - Non-contractual liability)

(2005/C 6/68)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-76/03: Herbert Meister, official of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), residing at Muchamiel (Spain), represented by G. Vandersanden, lawyer, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Waelbroeck) – application for, first, annulment of the OHIM's decision PERS-AFFECT-02-30 of 22 April 2002 appointing the applicant, in the interest of the service, with his post, as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs and, second, for damages – the Court, composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and E. Cremona, Judges; D. Christiansen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 by way of damages for breach of administrative duty; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 by way of damages for breach of administrative duty;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the OHIM to pay its own costs and one fifth of the costs incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the OHIM to pay its own costs and one fifth of the costs incurred by the applicant;

| 4. | Orders the applicant to pay four fifths of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the applicant to pay four fifths of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.

1

---
July 27 , 2015

Mr s. Rebecca Frost

2 Elliott Farm Road

Califon, NJ 07830

Dear Mr s. Frost :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why w e can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 2 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 2708 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. Th e information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your r equest any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do N o t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen a nd

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Cassation, Commercial, Financial and Economic Division, France by order of that court of 14 December 2004 in the case of Laboratoires Boiron S.A. against Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (Central Agency for Social Security Bodies)

(Case C-526/04)

(2005/C 69/11)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Court of Cassation, Commercial, Financial and Economic Division, France, of 14 December 2004, received at the Court Registry on 29 December 2004 for a preliminary ruling in the case of Laboratoires Boiron S.A. against Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale on the following questions:

----