alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date:

To: Terri Plumb

Regulations Development Group OSORA From: Latesha Walker

Director Division of Medical Review and Education Subject: Rulemaking Record for CMS - 15 90 - P: Medi care Program; Pay ment Policies under the Phys ician Fee Schedule , DM E Face - to - Face Encounters, Elimination of the Requirement for Termination of Non - random Prepay ment Complex Medical Review, and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2013 I certify that to the best of my

knowledge , the attached informati on includes all material that the Division of Medical Review and Education considered , or had before it in developing the above - referenced rul e. I have identified any proprietary data or confidential information that should not be released to the public upon a request for infor mation under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Attached is an index of all material included .**Index of Supporting Information for:** 

CMS - 15 90 - P: Medi care Program; Pay ment Policies under the Phys ician Fee Schedule , DME Face - to - Face Encounters, Elimination of the Requirement for Termination of Non random Prepay

ment Complex Medical Review, and Other Revisions to Part B for

CY 2013 Title of Document Does this document contain confidential information or proprietary data? 1. D urable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) Revised 2010 Fee Schedule 05/25/2010 No 2. 42 CFR Part 440 [CMS 2348

–

P] Medicaid Program; Face - to - Face Requirements for Home Health Services; Policy

Changes and Clarifications Related to Home Health No

3. 42 CFR Parts 409, 418, 424, 484, and 489 [CMS

– 1510

–F] Medicare Program; Home Health Prospective Pay

ment System Rate Update for Calendar Year 2011; Changes in Certification Requirements for Home Health Agencies and Hospices No

4. 42 CFR Part 410 Medicare Program; Conditions for Pay

ment of Power Mobility Devices, Including Power Wheelchairs and Power- Operated Vehicles; Interim Final Rule No

5. 42 CFR Parts 482, 485, 491, and 494 [CMS

–3213

–

P] Medicare & Medicaid Programs; In fluenza Vaccination Standard for Cert ain Participating Providers and Suppliers No

6. GAO - 07 - 59 - Improvements Needed to Address Improper Pay

ments for Medical Equipment and Supplies No 7. OEI - 02 - 07 - 00421 - Vulnerabilities in Medicare Pay

ments for Pressure Reducing Support Surfaces No 8. Usage and Documentation of Home NoOx ygen Therap y" (OE I - 03 - 96 - 00090)

9. Email: FW: F2F Reg with Attachment “Policy L ist - F2F - draft 3 Yes 10. OACT estimate of DME face - to - face encounter policy

in CMS - 1590 - P No 1 1 . Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 20 - Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) No 1 2 . Medicare Program Integrity Manual Chapter 5

– Items and Services Having Special DME Review Considerations No 1 3 . www.stopm edicarefraud.gov . No
#### Pfetcher, Respondent, vs. Doyle and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Lawrence J. Brody*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, vs. Pochowski and wife, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Miller, Mack & Fairchild,*attorneys, and *Frederick L. Allen,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Kleczka & Kleczka*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
August 2014



# OEM Support

 Dates indicated in ( ) above describe when the OEM first approved B20 or higher biodiesel blends



###  All major OEMs producing diesel vehicles for the U.S. market support at least B5 and lower blends, and over 78 % of those

manufacturers now support B20 or higher biodiesel blends in at least some of their equipment , including nearly 85 % of the

medium & heavy duty truck OEMs . The biodiesel component must meet ASTM D6751, the approved stand ard for pure

biodiesel, and the B20 blends must meet ASTM D7467 specifications. Many OEMs also recommend the use of a BQ

- 9000

supplier.



###  For a complete detailed listing of OEM position statements on biodiesel , visit: www.biodiesel.org/using

- biodiesel/oem

i nformation

. 

### OEMs Supporting B 100 OEMs Supporting B20 OEMs Supporting B5

Case IH (2007) Arctic Cat (2006) Audi *

(Allow up to B20 in IL in

2009

- 2014 models )

Deutz AG ( 2012) Buhler (2007) BMW

Fairbanks Morse (2007) Caterpillar (All mod el years) Hustler Turf Equipment

New Holland ( 2007 ) Chrysler

– Ram (2007) & Jeep (2013) Mercedes Benz *

( For blends over B5, see MB brochure )

Cummins (2002) Mitsubishi Fuso *

Daimler Trucks

- Including: (2012) PACCAR

- Including:

- Detroi t Diesel * (Series 60 engines

only; other models approved for B5) - Kenworth

- Freightliner / “ Custom Chassis

- Peterbilt

- Thomas Built Buses Volkswagen *

(Allow up to B20 in IL and MN in

2009

- 2014 models )

- Western Star

Fe rris (2011) * = Actively Researching B20

Ford (2011 )

GMC & Chevrolet

(2011 all; SEO available since 2007)

HDT USA Motorcycles (2008)

Hino Trucks (2011) Biodiesel Position Not Yet Announced:

Navistar

- International / MaxxForce

(2007 ) JCB

IC Bus (2007) Mahindra

Isuzu Commercial Trucks (2011 ) Mazda

John Deere (2004) Porsche

Kubota (2006) Nissan

Mack (EPA 2007 & EPA 2010 models)

Monaco RV (2007)

Perkins (2008)

Tomcar (2008)

Toro (2008; SEO kits for <2008)

Volvo Trucks (EPA 2010 models)

Workhorse (2007)

Yanmar (2011)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; SBIR/STTR Review: Tools for Assessment and Improvement of Neurologic Outcomes in Perinatal Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         February 24, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 4, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02600 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
( 

I 

~ 

Sallijo Freeman, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

JUL 1 2 2011 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

11 1259 

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s application for a temporary 

restraining order ("TRO") or a preliminary injunction ("PI"), which is accompanied by her 

complaint and application for leave to proceed informa pauperis. The Court will grant the in 

forma pauperis application, deny the TRO/PI motion, and dismiss the case because the complaint 

fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

complaints to contain ''(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction 

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief" 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 

F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair 

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate 
-------- ------------- -------------

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues Wal-Mart Stores. She lists her allegations 

as "Violation ofthe American with Disabilities Act" and "Breach of Agreement," CompI. at L 

but she has stated no supporting facts and, thus, has failed to provide any notice of a claim. 

Plaintiff seeks permission to file an amended complaint, but she does not explain why she 

submitted a wholly deficient complaint in the first place. Furthermore, plaintiff states no basis 

for issuing a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction "to enjoin the defendant 

from the destruction of documents pertaining to" what appears to be her employment application. 

TRO Mot. at 1. Hence, the Court will dismiss the instant action without prejudice to plaintiff 

refiling a complaint that complies with Rule 8. A sep'~~ate Order ~f dismi-ssal~ompanies this 

I 

- I ) 

Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: July Ji-, 2011 

/ / ~ " / 

/~ 

/ ,- '-Of \ 

United States Distric Judge 

2
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                   EXHIBIT 21


         List of Subsidiaries of Community Central Bank Corporation



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                      JURISDICTION OF             NAMES UNDER WHICH
(AND OWNERSHIP)                                         ORGANIZATION                IT DOES BUSINESS
---------------                                         ------------                 ----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                         <C>
Community Central Bank                                  Michigan                    Community Central Bank
(wholly-owned subsidiary of Community Central Bank
Corporation)

Community Central Mortgage Company, L.L.C.              Michigan                    Community Central Mortgage
(99% owned by Community Central Bank and 1% owned by                                Company, L.L.C.
Community Central Bank Corporation)                                                 Mortgage Banking Solutions

Community Central Capital Trust I                       Delaware                    Community Central Capital
(Business Trust, wholly owned subsidiary of Community                               Trust I
Central Bank Corporation)

Community Central Development Enterprise, LLC *         Michigan                    Community Central Development
(wholly owned subsidiary of Community Central Bank)                                 Enterprise, LLC

* Inactive
</TABLE>
From: Anderson, Wes [mailto:Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov]

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:56 AM

To: Poston, Mona; Edwards, Brenda

Cc: Parker, Graham B; Liu, Bing; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; Somasundaram, Sriram;
Winiarski, David W; Matthew Millard; Aris Marantan; Katie Coughlin; Williams, Grant D;
Scott, Michael J Subject: Email to file for conversation with representatives from HARDI

Memo to file
Docket ID EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 Rulemaking for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps

From: Wes Anderson

Ref: Conversation with Talbot H. Gee, Vice President of the Heating, Air-conditioning and Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) and Tom Roberts, President of CFM Distributors, Inc.

The conversation was centered on opening a dialogue with the Department of Energy and HARDI. Talbot noted that they would be willing to share some aggregated data in reference to unit shipments. Tom pointed out that, in contrast to what would normally come from a manufacture, distributor’s information may be different. Tom also offered to allow DOE an in-depth inspection of how the Residential Central AC/HP’s distribution channel looks. They reiterated HARDI’s comments submitted during the comment period and are concerned that given the latest ec onomic developments, too many changes in the regulatory arena will send shockwaves through their current business model.

Wes Anderson Mechanical Engineer Building Technologies Program Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy U. S. Department of Energy

202-586-7335
Exhibit 32.2





KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  June
  1, 2005 |  | /s/ Kimberly J. Allen                                       
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Kimberly J. Allen
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





---

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           ONYX SOFTWARE CORPORATION

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES:

CSN Computer Consulting GmbH, a German subsidiary
Market Solutions Limited, a United Kingdom subsidiary
Onyx CSN Computer Holding GmbH, a German subsidiary
Onyx ERM GmbH, a German subsidiary
Onyx Software Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore subsidiary
Onyx Software Australia Pty, Ltd., a New South Wales subsidiary
Onyx Software Canada Inc., an Ontario subsidiary
Onyx Software Co., Ltd., a Japanese subsidiary
Onyx Software Hong Kong Ltd., a Hong Kong subsidiary
Onyx Software S.A., a Swiss subsidiary
Onyx Software UK, Ltd., a Great Britain subsidiary
Xyno Software France SARL, a French subsidiary

DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES:

EnCyc. Inc., a Michigan subsidiary
RevenueLab, LLC, a Delaware subsidiary
Versametrix Corporation, a Washington subsidiary
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of C.B., a child. ) ) ) M.B., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3874 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche Arkin, Judge. Linda C. Clark of Linda C. Clark, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina Moore and Joanna Summers Brunell, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 23.1

                             CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have issued our report dated May 9, 2003, except for the third paragraph of
Note 13, under the subheading "SEC Investigation and Other", as to which the
date is June 11, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in the Annual Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Schick Technologies,
Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-46825, effective February 24, 1998, File No.
333-83488, effective February 27, 2002).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
New York, New York
June 16, 2003
Order filed June 18, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00350-CV

____________

JIMMY GETTINGS, Appellant

V.

DARLENE BOUNDS, GRADY GETTINGS, BELVA GETTINGS, CHURCH 

OF CHRIST, MILL ROAD, OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CHURCH 

OF CHRIST OF CAMPIONS OF HOUSTON, TEXAS DOES 1-25, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-02794

ORDER

This is an appeal from the order signed April 1, 2019 regarding Grady and 

Belva Gettings’ motion for sanctions and the order signed April 8, 2019 regarding 

the Gettings Family Defendants’ no-evidence motion for summary judgment. It 

appears we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, but we are unable to make that 

determination because the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we enter 
2

the following order.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a partial clerk’s record on 

or before June 28, 2019, containing (1) any judgment that has been signed in this 

case, (2) any request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, (3) any postjudgment motion and the court’s ruling on the motion, and (4) any notice of appeal.

If any of the requested items is not part of the case file, the district clerk is 

directed to file a partial clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the 

requested item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
--_._.-

---

----

----= 

----. 

. (C .~ 

"D~-' .. ,_. w 

!"" -- r'·,=-==== 

':f~~-~~----~-~ Lt!~~;;;;;; ",- '" .,' 

CD 

; ,:~. j 

I IIIJIJ 11111 11111 11111 IIlli 11111 11111111111111111111 111111 1111111 14000091000 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07363; 

August 16, 1968 

MElYIORANDUJ:1 1'0 ~I ___ -..JI (COLONEL DIETRICH) 

SUBJECT: Encryptton Devices 

Reference my memorandum to you, subject as above, 

dated August 12, 1968. My search for a DOD policy on 

satellite encryption ha.s uncovered the attached document 

consisting of a Ivlemorandum for lYIembers of the U. S. 

Communications Security Board on the subject of Proposed 

National Policy on the Security of Heteorological Satellite 

Information (S), dated 5 September 1967 and a draft national 

policy which is limited entirely to meteorological satellite 

information. From what I can determine, this activity has 

fallen by the wayside. 

The main usefulness of these papers to you may be to 

give you a feel for the thinking at the time they were 

prepared. You ,;,;'i11 note in the draft policy statement there 

is a certain amount of latitude provided as to whether or 

not encryption is used versus positive and selective control. 

I would aSSUllle that this latitude was designed as an escape 

clause because of a realization of the cost, complexity and 

difficulty of real 'tvorld encryption. 

If I am able to uncover any further useful information 

on this subject, I will forward it to you . 

Cys to: 

SAFSL - Chron File 

SAFSLP - Official File 

SCG Read 

ColFord/SAFSLP/S0945/l6Aug 

68/shw 

Colonel, USAF 

Chief, Program and Policies 

Div, SAFSL 

I 

iI 

L " 

r 

I 

[ 

1. Atch 

ale 

i 

F 

I 

I 

Page 1 of 1 pages I 

Copy :J.... of 4 copies / ! 

SA.FSL Control BYE 68377-68/~1 

DORIAN 

I 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07363
EXHIBIT 10.53
                                                                   -------------
HEARTSOFT LOGO



CORPORATE NOTE


MARCH 17, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Heartsoft, Inc. promises to pay to the order of:

                    Mr. Greg Dhuyvetter
                    LaMode Cleaners
                    7025 East 41st Street
                    Tulsa, Oklahoma  74145

the sum of $50,000 (fifty thousand dollars), with interest from the date written
above until paid; at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.

This Note, together with all interest due, is payable in six (6) months from the
date written above.

Heartsoft shall reserve the right to prepay the principle of this Note, together
with all such accrued interest at the time of prepayment in whole or in part
prior to its due date without premium or penalty.

Heartsoft, signers, and endorsers of this Note severally waive demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection and notice of protest
and agree to all extensions and partial payments before or after maturity,
without prejudice to the holder. This written Note represents the final
agreement between the parties and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior,
contemporaneous, or subsequent oral agreements of the parties.

Heartsoft, Inc.


by:        /s/Benjamin P. Shell
           --------------------
           Benjamin P. Shell
           Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

AUTOZONERS, LLC,

Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00062-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable M. Sue Kurita of County Court at Law No. Six of El Paso County, Texas and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the 

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., concurring