alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A



     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
            For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.

                   Commission File No. 0-21981

              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-2
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


                  HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                   (Administrator of the Trust)
       (Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)



            DELAWARE                      36-3670374
(State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of Administrator)    Identification Number of
                                   Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number including area code (847)564-5000

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

                             SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
report to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer Loan Trust
1996-2 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                          HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-2
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 8, 2000       By: /s/John W. Blenke
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3


                           Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual Servicing
              Report dated March 28, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    889,616
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 922,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                      702,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    922,785
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,347,672
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               196,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             9,150,890
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         9,150,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           9,150,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.57
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                           TOMORROW'S MORNING, INC.
                       (A Development Stage Enterprise)

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                                March 31, 1997         March 31, 1997
                                                                --------------         -------------
<S>                                                             <C>                    <C> 
Net Loss...................................................     $    (655,026)         $ (1,301,015)

Basis for computation of primary earnings per
common and common equivalent share:
 
     Weighted average number of shares
     outstanding during period.............................         1,064,372             1,064,372
     Weighted average (incremental) common
     share equivalent after considering the effects
     of options and warrants issued during the
     periods ended March 31, 1996 and after
     assumed repurchase of treasury shares as
     required by Securities Exchange Commission
     Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83......................           192,695               192,695
                                                                      -------               -------
 
     Total weighted average number of shares...............         1,257,067             1,257,067
                                                                    =========             =========

     Loss per share........................................     $       (0.52)         $      (1.03)
                                                                    =========             =========
</TABLE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                                    Page 16
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Inventory of 
U.S. Marine Protected Areas: Site Characteristics and Human Uses; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce published a document in the Federal 
Register of February 2, 2015, concerning request for comments on a 
proposed information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB 
Control No. 0648-0449. The document contained incorrect dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Charles M. Wahle, Senior 
Scientist, NOAA's National Marine Protected Areas Center, via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f1faf3e0fef7e1bce5f3fafef7d2fcfdf3f3bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41222920332d24326f3620292d24012f2e20206f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>, or by telephone: (831) 647-6460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 2, 2015, Vol. 80, No. 21, on 
page 5515, in the third column, correct the ``Dates'' caption to read: 
``DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 3, 
2015''.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-02741 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6848
WILLIAM E. ALTON, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-147-AW) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 3, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Alton, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William E. Alton, III, a Maryland prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL
       CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF AUTOMOBILE
       LOAN RECEIVABLES


     The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and
     maintaining the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this
     responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required
     to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures.
     The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide
     management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets
     are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and
     that transactions are executed in accordance with management's
     authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of
     financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles.

     We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Bank's
     internal control structure based on the criteria established in Internal
     Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
     Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO")
     relative to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy
     Chase Auto Receivables Trusts Series 1995-1, 1995-2 and 1996-1
     (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30,
     1997, and we have determined that the Bank maintained an effective
     internal control structure over financial reporting relative to the
     servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of
     September 30, 1997.

     However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any
     internal control structure, including the possibility of human error and
     the circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an
     effective internal control structure can provide only reasonable
     assurance with respect to reliability of financial statements and
     safeguarding and management of assets.  Furthermore, the
     effectiveness of any internal control structure can change with changes
     in circumstances.





       Kevin B. Cashen                         John C. Harley
       Senior Vice President                   Senior Vice President





       George P. Clancy                        Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
       Executive Vice President                Executive Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

       November 18, 1997                                    AUTOINTC.LTR
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report", each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date: April 11, 2003                    By:   /s/ Joseph M. Cummins
                                           -------------------------------------
                                             Joseph M. Cummins
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-43613 and Registration Statement No. 333-93211 of C3, Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-100883 of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 9, 2007, relating to(i) the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123R, *Share-Based Payment*, effective January 1, 2006) and (ii) management’s annual report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCharles & Colvard, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,044
<PP&E>                                           3,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,369
<SALES>                                          4,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            3,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (43)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,608)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas Shea, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EPIRUS Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 29, 2016 | /s/   Thomas Shea                                |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Thomas   Shea                                    |
|                        | *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* |
|                        | *and Treasurer*                                  |
|                        | *(Principal Financial Officer and Principal*     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.4

                               Women.com networks


March 2001 through Dec 2001 Terms
o    Flight Dates: March 1st 2001 to Dec 31st 2001

o    Women.com Cost Per Click (CPC) Compensation: eDiets to pay Women.com
     [______] per click, applied to 80% of clicks as reported by NetGravity
     (factored clicks). CPC payment not to exceed [________] per month. CPC
     compensation to apply to any and all clicks up to 200,000 factored clicks
     per month.

o    Women.com Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) Compensation: [_____] per sale for all
     sales up to and including 1500 sales per month, and [______] per sale for
     all sales above 1500 sales per month.

o    eDiets Cost Per Acquisition Price Protection: Overall Women.com
     compensation shall not exceed [_______] per unit sale within any given
     month. If within any given month the combined Cost Per Click and Cost Per
     Acquisition compensation exceeds [______], Women.com will reduce the Cost
     Per Acquisition compensation rate accordingly (in order not to exceed the
     agreed upon acquisition cost of [_____]).

o    Advertising Elements: Women.com will maintain control over all advertising
     placements on Women.com Networks, and will coordinate the exchange of
     advertising and sales performance data for the purposes of program
     optimization.

o    Performance Reports: Women.com and eDiets will coordinate the exchange of
     performance reports on a weekly basis, with a minimum requirement of 2
     reports per month (mid-month and month-to-date summary) to be provided by
     each party. Reports will detail all pertinent data, including click data
     and sale data based on individual creative unit types and placements.

o    Renewal / Cancellation: This agreement is Cancelable by either party with
     30 days prior written notification provided the other party has breached
     the terms of this agreement.

Client Signature:   /s/ Christine Brown           Title:    VP Operations
                  -----------------------------          -----------------------

Printed Name:      Christine Brown                Date:        2/28/01
                  -----------------------------          -----------------------

Authorized By:      /s/ Walt Cheruk               Date:        2/23/01
                  -----------------------------          -----------------------
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40696

(Summary Calendar)

EDWARD RHOME,

Pl aintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNKNOWN KRUIZE, Security Officer, Coffield Unit;

UNKNOWN SELF, Security Officer, Coffield Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-391)

June 4, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Edward Rhome, Texas prisoner #6 3852, moves this court for leave to appeal i n forma

pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) in his appeal from the district

court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit alleging a failure-to-protect claim. Rhome’s motion for leave

to proceed IFP is GRANTED.2

The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount of the

filing fee, $105. As Rhome does not have funds for immediate payment of this fee, he is assessed an

init ial fee of $3.37 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1). Following payment of the partial filing fee,

funds shall be deducted from Rhome’s prisoner account until the full filing fee is paid. Id.

IT IS ORDERED that Rhome pay the appropriate filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of

Rhome’s inmate account shall forward payments from his account to the Clerk of the District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees

are paid in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(2).

Rhome argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants.

Rhome’s argument is misplaced because the district court did not grant summary judgment for the

defendants. The district court dismissed Rhome’s claims following an evidentiary hearing. S ee

Flowers v. Phelps

, 956 F.2d 488 (5th Cir.), modification on other grounds

, 964 F.2d 400 (1992).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for substantially the same reasons adopted

by the district court and set forth in the magistrate judge’s report. Rhome v. Kruize

, No. 6:95-CV-391

(E.D. Tex. July 3, 1996).

IFP GRANTED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.