alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.4

Vk6.-

'NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C.

VSETTIrItyralf-ItiCneA6

4)tr-Pdher. •

yr-A-piter4newP&Lescarole 'NA AYNIPINOINC 010111111111111111

IMIIIIC/mit son.vo ncrier

on A.. CMK 1 ., 2

OPP.CE *F TrIE DEPUTY DIRECTOR unglennimel

April 28, 1967

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. FLAX

SUBJECT: United States Intelligence Board Meeting

April 27, 1967

In its consideration of the subject of decontrol or

downgrading of TALENT-KEYHOLE materials, the USIB reached

agreement on three matters:

That the fact of the collection of

satellite photography be acknowledged at the

SECRET level.

That more liberalized procedures

should be devised to permit publication of

satellite-derived intelligence in reports at

the SECRET and TOP SECRET levels to include

a simple statement confirming the satellite

source.

c. That the photography itself not be

released from the System although COMOR should

consider simplification of procedures related

to approval for sanitization of selected photography to permit its use by Strike Forces.

The COMOR has been asked to submit to the Board the

detailed procedures whereby point b. above would be accomplished. Board approval of such procedures will precede

action with regard to the first decision. At that time

the Board will . have to conclude upon the procedure whereby

relevant Government officials are advised of the fact•of

United States collection by satellite means.

th

also agreed to recommend the use of one of

meet the GMAIC requirement for repeated
. 601.

••• •

coverage of cer

recommends the

used as promptl

•

•

The Board express

artin.

It also, of course, bears some relation to HPIC's receipt of tho film from the two mimeionm which I an sure will be

discussed in the near future by COMOR at which time

Colonel Howard will participate in the discussion. •

Copy 1 Dr. Flax

2 SS-5

3 SS-3

4 RF

5 RD-2

WIIIII •Nit.• • ta•AP•al teen •StOr•nt

IN imaleMtt aN lie lion fan ilima•

- -MMINEn•n•n

W WMA
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning Grant 
(R34) and Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (UO1).
    Date: February 20, 2015.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 3G13B, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Yong Gao, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 
#3G13B, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 
9823, Rockville, MD 20892-7616, (240) 669-5048, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01786e6f662f66606e416f68692f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d9cfcec78ec7c1cfe0cec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02094 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2004201EN.01001302.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/13

---

Action brought on 14 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-252/04)

(2004/C 201/25)

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Georgios Zavvos and Michael Shotter, of its Legal Service.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt, and in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/22/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt, and in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/22/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 24 July 2003.

---

(1)  
  OJ No L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 51.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffStandard Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Radioactive Material (NUREG-1609)

# Standard Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Radioactive Material (NUREG-1609, Initial Report)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1609, Initial Report (PDF - 1.10 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1999

Spent Fuel Project Office Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Standard Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Radioactive Material provides guidance for the review and approval of applications for packages used to transport radioactive material (other than irradiated nuclear fuel) under 10 CFR Part 71.

This document is intended for use by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff. Its objectives are to (1) summarize 10 CFR Part 71 requirements for package approval, (2) describe the procedures by which the NRC staff determines that these requirements have been satisfied, and (3) document the practices developed by the staff in previous reviews of package applications.

Comments, errors or omissions, and suggestions for improvement should be sent to the Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Our company is looking for a UAV commercial license exception in order to take drone video footage of golf courses for our client events. The drone footage would not be taken from an altitude higher than 200 feet, and 

will always take place on private golf course property. The drone will be used to act like someone hitting a golf ball, thus, the drone will never fly higher than 200 feet (or roughly the highest a human can hit a golf ball into the 
air). Drone footage will primarily occur in the early morning hours, when limited (or no) golf course staff or golfers will be on the golf course, for purposes of safety.

Our company has been in business since 1977 and operates a golf tour operator business, in which we coordinate golf travel to various destinations throughout the US and the world. In recent years/months, clients have continually 

requested we take drone footage of the golf courses they are playing, in order to turn the footage into an online video/photography montage. We have also been approached by various golf courses to take drone footage, which will then 

be utilized on their respective websites for marketing purposes.

Since the requested drone footage will always take place on private property, with limited or no humans present, and never at high altitudes, we respectfully request an exceptional be allowed under the above outlined circumstances.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDDIE RAY GRAY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 357 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
TOP-SEGRET-

/11dNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

MOMEMPIIII

26 April 1976

MEMORANDUM F0.111111111 IC STAFF

SUBJECT: National Reconnaissance Office Membership on

the National Foreign Intelligence Board (NFIB)

The Director of the National Reconnaissance Office (DNRO)

has, in the past, sat with the United States Intelligence Board

(USIB) for matters affecting the National Reconnaissance Program

(NRP). This relationship was recognized in the 1965 NRO

• Agreement signed by the' Director of Central Intelligence and

the Deputy Secretary of Defense. As discussed with Mr. Bush

at the USIB meeting on 15 April 1976, this relationship will

continue in the future. The Director, or in his absence the

Deputy Director, of the NRO will sit with the National Foreign

Intelligence Board for matters affecting the NRP or the NRO

and have a voice in the deliberations.

It is our interpretation that paragraph 2. c. of the

proposed DCID 1/19 will cover our participation in USIB

because the covert nature of the organization precludes

specific mention of the NRO.

Charles W. Cook

EXECONVI ORM 1102 GX/MPTICIN CATE. 11:n: -TOP-SECRET--

Qom Nl 011CLAIMPY OM IMP Oaf

COPIA!'

COP Y A° OF COIN E.

PAGE I OF 1 PAGE.
4,

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

t

a

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY

.

• i

4P.

MEMORANDUM

26 April 1976

Jack,

If not already done, I

suggest that this be made a

matter of record in the

USIB minutes.

•

•

Alo

SIP

ti

.
Subj:ECS:Economics and the Conservation                          Date:  July 13, 2000

Buffer Initiative

   To:All EmployeesFile Code:  190

NRCS, Texas

In order to help promote the Conservation Buffer Initiative, a new option on the Texas NRCS Homepage is now available.  It is called *Economics and the Conservation Buffer Initiative*.  This option utilizes a tool called partial budgeting to evaluate the implementation of buffer practices.  Partial budgeting provides a framework for evaluating a proposed change in farm operations.  A partial budget isolates the increases and decreases in revenues and costs that are directly attributable to the proposed change.  The net impact of those factors can be summed to determine the change in profit, including non-monetary effects.

Example budgets were developed using data from NRCS field offices and from the Texas A&M Crop Budgets.  Field personnel should modify the examples in order to reflect local conditions.  The budgets are available as an Excel file.  Users can download the file, save it on their CCE computers, and utilize it in order to promote the Conservation Buffer Initiative.  Any questions should be directed to James Featherston, Agricultural Economist, 254-742-9884.

/  S  /

JOHN P. BURT

State Conservationist
Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications

     I, Henry E. Gemino, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Profile
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

     Date: September 25, 2008

     /s/ Henry E. Gemino
     -------------------
     Henry E. Gemino
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00513

- CR

Maria Dolores Garcia
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 437th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018CR3313

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having con sidered t his cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
April 15 , 2021
00410e1A

MGM 451,111LAKIAL

.111.141461114011111

7. 3. f

81KIRtITY:

OPRRATIPIAL: COROIA

XVLOZekriall: (T.11. RUP7)

mUsion: Reconnais

TTFS OF MOOR: Stereo cow►ergent panoramic system utilising two cameras scanning

transverse to the line of flight.

LENS AND FOCAL MRS: Fetsval design f/3.5, 1P.L. 24", t/4

FORMAT RUE: 2.25" x 29.325"

RIRKZUFICII: 175 Om on lens bench - high contrast targets

(see remarks)

OROMD COMM PER =BM

LAZIRAL: 70° total (112

IMAM: 30,657 Ea

OPERATIOSIAL AIRTIVDR: 123 no

naicts mann 24,500 ft/see

FILM DATA:

MS: 8.0. 132

WI T8:

1103TAGR:

70

7,800' of 3 mil film

smut or noroumpar AT NOM 1/375,000

Duos MOTION OCIOICIRATEZ: Accomplished by translating lens at the

sweep is generating an exposure .71w

Sae #: eferaidev Poo A

DAM CRUM: Time to milliseconds - an ephemeris is published

frequency marks - 200 cps .

ZIT SCRIMULEB: Current program

some time the

of 7Uf PP. es

r LAI-

•

rep J.. gee jnV

fotr.
uCBTRACTOBB AlD supoommerops:

FREMB/MBASBOVAIII DAC and Itek are associate contractors

UMW Itek

FZMN 11.1. I

/12=11: Thor (Douglas) and Agena B and D (Lockheed)

IBBNARKB: A stellar/frmming camera vill be added after MI-13

For compUting coverage at 123 as altitude

Assume 2.6' of film/frame

10.35 nil useful advance per frame (10% overlap)

3. 2,962 frames

Resolution - 14 August

Itek believes ve are getting 125 limn at 2:1 contrast-dynamic.

Lockheed has stated that ve are getting 90 Om at 2:1 contrast-dynamic

based an tests. Itek reels these tests are equipment limited and their number

of 125 is obtained in orbit - they believe the space environment to be as good

as a lens beach.

Based on 125 limn - 2:1 contrast-dynamic • OBABT 81321 9.8'

Based on 90 1/am - 2:1 contrast-dynamic MOOT. 8] 13.6'
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2102 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2102

  To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require a report on 
  improving access to capital in rural areas for small businesses and 
                   qualifying venture capital funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2017

  Mr. Kihuen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require a report on 
  improving access to capital in rural areas for small businesses and 
                   qualifying venture capital funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``More Job Opportunities and Business 
Startups for Rural Areas Act'' or the ``More JOBS for Rural Areas 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SEC REPORT IMPROVING ACCESS TO CAPITAL IN RURAL AREAS.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission shall issue a report on 
improving access to capital in rural areas, including--
            (1) best practices to improve investor base and small 
        businesses seeking access to capital;
            (2) recommendations for technological advances for 
        communications between investors and small businesses;
            (3) improving increased awareness for rural area small 
        businesses about venture capitalists funding opportunities;
            (4) recommendations to small businesses to learn about 
        diverse forms of capital to create innovation and jobs in rural 
        areas; and
            (5) assessment on factors currently inhibiting access to 
        capital in rural areas and recommendations to expand access.

SEC. 3. SUNSET PROVISION.

    This report shall be issued to the committees of jurisdiction one 
year after enactment and shall be a one-time report.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004273EN.01000802.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 September 2004

in Case C-168/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 89/665/EEC and 95/63/EC - Incomplete transposition - Additional adjustment period)

(2004/C 273/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-168/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: I. Martínez del Peral) v Kingdom of Spain (Agent: L. Fragua Gadea) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 11 April 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C W.A Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric (Rapporteur) Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 September 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1) | By providing, in Article 1 of the sole transitional provision of Royal Decree No 1215/1997 of 18 July 1997 laying down the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers, for an additional adjustment period for work equipment already provided to workers at the undertaking and/or establishment prior to 27 August 1997, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (89/655/EEC), as amended by Council Directive 95/63/EC of 5 December 1995. |
| --- | --- |

1)

By providing, in Article 1 of the sole transitional provision of Royal Decree No 1215/1997 of 18 July 1997 laying down the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers, for an additional adjustment period for work equipment already provided to workers at the undertaking and/or establishment prior to 27 August 1997, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (89/655/EEC), as amended by Council Directive 95/63/EC of 5 December 1995.

| 2) | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 7.6.2003.

1

---