alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       HOMECAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                               NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED 
                                                                       JUNE 30, 
                                                                 1998            1997
                                                             -------------   ------------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Net income (loss)                                          $(20,854,170)    $3,999,204
  Less preferred stock dividends                                 (197,324)      (201,945)
                                                             ------------     ----------
  Net income (loss) for common stockholders                  $(21,051,494)    $3,797,259
                                                             ============     ==========
  Weighted average shares outstanding during the period         8,270,639      8,008,659
                                                             ============     ==========
  Basic earnings (loss) per common share                     $      (2.55)    $      .47
                                                             ============     ==========
 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Net income (loss) for common stockholders                  $(21,051,494)   $ 3,797,259
                                                             ============    ===========
  Weighted average shares outstanding during the period         8,270,639      8,008,659
  Common stock equivalents                                          /(1)/        594,242
  Assume conversion of preferred stock                              /(1)/      1,500,000
                                                             ------------    -----------
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                    8,270,639     10,102,901
                                                             ============    ===========
  Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                   $      (2.55)   $       .40
                                                             ============    ===========
</TABLE>
______________

/(1)/  Excluded due to antidilutive effect.
EXHIBIT
32(a)





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the three
month period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc., certify that based on my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      February 16, 2010
              /s/ A.L. GiannopoulosA.L.
      Giannopoulos
#### Will of Robinson: Robinson and others, Appellants, vs. McGovern, Respondent.

For the appellants: *H. T. Ferguson*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Benjamin Poss,*attorney, and *H. W. Schidef*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.

Rosenberry, C. J., took no part.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 23, 1930.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2019

No. 04-18-00002-CR

Larry Donnell GIBBS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015 CRR 001320 D-1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on July 6, 2018. Appellant was granted 

three thirty-day extensions, making his brief due by October 4, 2018. On September 28, 2018, 

appellant filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record, which raised concerns regarding the 

completeness of the record on appeal. By order dated October 5, 2018, we abated this cause to 

the trial court to address the concerns raised in appellant’s motion. A supplemental reporter’s 

record was filed on December 4, 2018, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial 

court’s findings of fact was filed on December 10, 2018. On December 18, 2018, the cause was 

reinstated on this court’s docket, and appellant was ordered to file his brief by no later than 

January 17, 2019. Appellant filed a fifth motion for extension of time to file his brief until 

February 18, 2019. We granted the fifth motion but advised appellant this was the final extension 

of time he would be granted and that if the brief was not filed by February 18, 2019, this appeal 

would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing and to consider whether sanctions 

are appropriate.

On February 19, 2019, appellant filed a sixth motion for extension of time to file his 

brief. The motion is DENIED. Appellant’s brief is now due. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000350194
<NAME>                   United Systems Technology, Inc.
       
<S>                      <C>               <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS          3-MOS       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1997   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>             SEP-30-1998    SEP-30-1997   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        298903              0        204807
<SECURITIES>                       0              0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                 201253              0        216693  
<ALLOWANCES>                       0              0             0
<INVENTORY>                        0              0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              572208              0        427665
<PP&E>                         67179              0         85940
<DEPRECIATION>                 31075          40428             0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               1113673              0       1053265   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1108957              0       1210749
<BONDS>                        50000              0         50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0             0
<PREFERRED>                   130000              0        130000
<COMMON>                     4827857              0       4317803
<OTHER-SE>                         0              0             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1113673              0       1053265
<SALES>                        97943          53016             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              425831         393484             0
<CGS>                          31975          24428             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 376104         402156             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1433          (1183)            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1126           1381             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0              0             0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0              0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0              0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0             0
<CHANGES>                          0              0             0
<NET-INCOME>                   51160          (9855)            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0              0             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0              0             0
                

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2216 

To provide that certain project works on the St. Croix River, Maine, are 

not required to be licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mr. POLIQUIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide that certain project works on the St. Croix River, 

Maine, are not required to be licensed by the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL POWER ACT LICENSE NOT REQUIRED 

4 FOR CERTAIN PROJECT WORKS ON THE ST. 

5 CROIX RIVER, MAINE. 

6 Any project works in existence as of the date of enact7 ment of this Act, or as may later be modified, that are 

8 licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

9 under Commission Project numbers 2492, 2618, and 

10 2660, as in effect on such date of enactment, shall not 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2216 IH

1 be required to be licensed under part I of the Federal 

2 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 792 et seq.). 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005115EN.01004101.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/41

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-151/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/74)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 14 February 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-151/04, Bernard Nonat v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 168 of 26.6.2004.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into all Registration
Statements on Form 10-K of South Street Financial Corp. of our report dated
November 3, 1998, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of South Street Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of September 30, 1998 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period then ended, which
report appears in the Company's 1998 annual report on Form 10-K.

/s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina
December 28, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   1-MO                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999             JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          14,719                  37,353
<SECURITIES>                                    42,817                  43,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,817                 234,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,012                  11,975
<INVENTORY>                                    228,997                 219,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453,790                 456,166
<PP&E>                                         261,621                 263,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 142,047                 140,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 751,903                 757,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,223                 247,786
<BONDS>                                        291,261                 323,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        80,989                  80,553
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,783                  20,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   751,903                 757,434
<SALES>                                        211,633                 819,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,633                 819,415
<CGS>                                          192,323                 735,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,782                 813,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,218                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,495                   7,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,862)                 (3,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,593)                   (948)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,269)                 (2,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,269)                 (2,830)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 116 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on telephone and other communications services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on telephone and other communications 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telephone Excise Tax 

5 Elimination Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND 

7 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subchapter B. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 116 IS

1 (1) Section 4293 of the Internal Revenue Code 

2 of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other 

3 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 4121) 

4 and subchapter B of chapter 33,’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘and chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by 

6 sections 4064 and 4121),’’. 

7 (2) Subsection (e) of section 6302 of such Code 

8 is amended— 

9 (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 

10 ‘‘COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND’’, 

11 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘section 

12 4251 or’’, and 

13 (C) in paragraph (2)— 

14 (i) by striking ‘‘4251, 4261,’’ and in15 serting ‘‘4261’’, and 

16 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’. 

17 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by 

18 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap19 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’. 

20 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such 

21 Code is amended— 

22 (A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

23 at the end, 

24 (B) by striking subparagraph (C), and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 116 IS

1 (C) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 

2 subparagraph (C). 

3 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of 

4 such Code is amended by striking the item relating 

5 to subchapter B. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills 

8 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005106EN.01002701.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/27

---

Action brought on 31 January 2005 by Reckitt Benckiser N.V. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-49/05)

(2005/C 106/59)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 31 January 2005 by Reckitt Benckiser N.V., established in Hoofddorp (the Netherlands) represented by G.S.P. Vos, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted on 11 November 2004 by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted on 11 November 2004 by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| — | allow registration of the Community trade mark 2 792 554; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow registration of the Community trade mark 2 792 554;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Community trade mark concerned: | A three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of the product being a rectangular tablet consisting of a blue top layer with red speckles and in it a sunken shining mother of pearl ball and a lower white layer with green speckles, for goods in class 1 (water softeners etc.) and 3 (laundry preparations etc.) |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner: | Refusal of registration |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1)

  Misapplication of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 |

Community trade mark concerned:

A three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of the product being a rectangular tablet consisting of a blue top layer with red speckles and in it a sunken shining mother of pearl ball and a lower white layer with green speckles, for goods in class 1 (water softeners etc.) and 3 (laundry preparations etc.)

Decision of the examiner:

Refusal of registration

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1)

1

Misapplication of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20.12.1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, p. 1).

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6365

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus R. B. BOYD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-30-P, CA-97-264-3-P) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. B. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: R. B. Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Boyd , Nos. CR-92-30-P; CA-97-264-3-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2005012EN.01001901.xml

| 18.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3616 — Auchan/La Rinascente)

(2005/C 12/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3616. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3616. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex).

---
"

,..111. •

n=I

:AY 'Am aft

•AVIL.71r4
A

t

„ '
t ,17:t ;4;i: 4;ite '

=Po

Af4t
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Roof Runoff Structure (Code 558) 

A structure or system of structures to collect, control, and

convey precipitation runoff from a roof. 

Practice Information 

The practice applies where roof runoff from precipitation

needs to be diverted away from structures or contaminated

areas. Roof runoff water that becomes contaminated by

contact with animal waste has to be stored and then

transported to the field for land application. Diverting clean

water away from animal waste concentration areas reduces the amount of liquid that must be stored

and utilized. 

Uncontrolled roof runoff can also cause soil erosion. Collecting the runoff and transporting it to a

stable outlet reduces soil erosion and improves water quality. 

Roof runoff water can also be collected and used for other purposes. Nonpotable water can be used

for irrigation. Potable water storage structures must be constructed of materials and in a manner that

will not increase the contamination of the stored water. Roof runoff that is collected and stored for

potable use must be treated prior to consumption. It must be tested periodically to ensure that

adequate quality is maintained. The use of roof runoff water for livestock water must be evaluated on

an individual basis. Components of this practice can include gutters, downspouts, rock-filled trenches

or pads, and subsurface drains or outlets. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 15 years. Roof runoff structures must be kept clean and

free of obstructions that reduce flow. Maintenance requirements include regular inspections and repair

of damaged components. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Roof Runoff Structure (Code 558) can be applied to

new or existing roofs. It is commonly applied with other conservation practices, such as NRCS CPSs

Waste Storage Facility (Code 313) and Composting Facility (Code 317). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.