alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111711 

DEPARTMENT OF rHE AIR FORCE 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

MEMORANDUM 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111711 

-

'•-• "./ • L 

,·,,.1_:. 
HANDLE V1A 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

- Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111711 

TOP SEeRET 

111111i1i111111i11111111111111i111111111111111111111111111111111 14 ()()078269D 

November 19, 1969 

NOTE FOR 

General Allen asked me to respond to your queries concerning 

"other than GE strike problems II and "potential problems. 11 

We have, for the past two weeks, been working only two 

current strike actions for the Program Offices, General Electric 

Company and Kawecki-Berylco, Hazelton, Pa. Kawecki-Berylco 

produces beryllium sheets and other smaller items as a vendor 

on several projects. We have been successful in extricating from 

the plant our most critically required items'. Generally these are 

items for which an alternate source cannot be found that will produce to our quality standards within a reasonable time period. We 

are working with the Air Force labor relations people, the Defense 

Contract Administration Service, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the Program Offices to effect the necessary 

removals and to investigate alternate sources. 

A potential problem could be Westinghouse Co. Currently 

the union is on a day-to-day working agreement. We are keeping 

a close watch on the Westinghouse situation. We do not, however, 

envision a significant impact even if the union does strike. 

We will continue to act as we have in the past as the NRO 

focal point for all strike problems. Generally we do not keep the 

DNRO informed of our strike actions unless his involvement or 

action is required or unless the strike impact becomes extraordinarily critical. 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

• MECEDA 

USAF 

COPY ---

PAGE ---

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111711 

HAN~ 

BYEMAN
- 0005140949_0001
- 0005140949_0002
MORGAN,

SEPTEMBER TERM, 1796.

#### English *v.*Camp.

A deposition certified to have been taken on the day and in the county in South Carolina, as specified in the notice, but without stating the particular place, cannot be read.

The counsel for the Defendant offered to read a deposition, and proved the notice, which was that the deposition would be taken at a certain day and place, in a certain county in South Carolina. The deposition was certified to have .been taken in thecounty, and on the day mentioned in the notice, but said nothing of the place where.

*Fer curiam*

The deposition, though certified to have been taken in the proper county, might not have been taken at the place appointed by the notice, and for ought “we know to the contrary, the adverse party may have gone to the place appointed on that day. Were we to allow of the reading of this deposition, we should establish a precedent which would put it in the power of a man to deprive his adversary of the benefit of cross-examination whenever he pleased. As to what the counsel urges, that we ought to presume the deposition to have been taken at the proper place, unless the adverse party will show the contrary — how is he to get his witnesses from South Carolina, to prove him to have been present on the day and piare appointed by the notice ? Or how is he to know, after having been at the place appointed where no deposition was taken, that the deposition had been taken at another place? He may not know of this until the deposition is produced on the trial, and then it is too late to prepare the necessary proof. The deposition was rejected.

Note.— *Vide Alston*v. *Taylor, post*394, in the note. Sur: Part’s. *of Mc Naughton & Co.*v. *Lester, post 421.*
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	NRO declassifies early ELINT satellite program
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/135/transparent.png?ver=B2YYtOxzg52QYDIqGLCDCQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">NRO declassifies early ELINT satellite program</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/21/2003284507/1920/1080/0/720801-F-RQ659-0029.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="NRO logo- smaller"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">NRO logo</div>
            <div class="image-caption">image of NRO logo</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Sept. 28, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p><strong>NRO declassifies early ELINT satellite program</strong><br />Announcement at Naval Research Lab Centennial celebrates historic partnership<br /><br />See Press Release</p> <br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents 6647 

Notice of February 4, 2015 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Situation in or in Relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire 

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, the President declared 

a national emergency, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire and ordered 

related measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to 

the conflict in Coˆte d’Ivoire. The situation in or in relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire, 

which has been addressed by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and subsequent resolutions, has resulted 

in the massacre of large numbers of civilians, widespread human rights 

abuses, significant political violence and unrest, and fatal attacks against 

international peacekeeping forces. 

The Government of Coˆte d’Ivoire and its people continue to make significant 

progress in promotion of democratic, social, and economic development. 

The United States also supports the advancement of impartial justice in 

Coˆte d’Ivoire as well as the Government of Coˆte d’Ivoire’s efforts to prepare 

for a peaceful, fair, and transparent presidential election in 2015, which 

will be an important milestone in Coˆte d’Ivoire’s progress. The United States 

is committed to helping Coˆte d’Ivoire strengthen its democracy, and we 

look forward to working with the Government and people of Coˆte d’Ivoire 

to ensure continued progress and lasting peace for all Ivorians. We urge 

all sides to work for the benefit of the country as a whole by rejecting 

violence and participating in the electoral process. 

While the Government of Coˆte d’Ivoire and its people continue to make 

progress toward peace and prosperity, the situation in or in relation to 

Coˆte d’Ivoire continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to 

the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, 

the national emergency declared on February 7, 2006, and the measures 

adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect 

beyond February 7, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of 

the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 

year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13396. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O1

6648 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 4, 2015. [FR Doc. 2015–02603 

Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O1OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 11, 

2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00578-CV

DEER PARK CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

V.

CRANE EQUIPMENT & SERVICE, INC., DBA GAFFEY, A DIVISION OF 

COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1003412

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 27, 2012. On August 28, 2012, the 

parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they have reached an agreement 

to settle the suit. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 August 5, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Senior Vice President,
Finance, and Chief
Financial Officer
Draft/22 Apr 69 -

_TOP-SFIGRZToilLIA11441101014614111

I " Handle via BYEMAN

Control System Only

BYE 11,892-69

Irt"

ALAI V..11et

MEMORANDUM FOR •

Executive Committee, National Reconnaissance Program

As you know, the President has established a Space Task Group

mit under my chairmanship to make recommendations about the objectives

and character of the national space program of the next ten years.

11111 am Dr. DuBridge is the staff director of the Task Group; Dr. Paine and

1.1111

MR Dr. Seamans are the NASA and DOD members. Representatives

EON from State, AEC and BOB attend meetings as observers.

11111 Since the Task Group review will include the DOD, space interests,

111111.

NM I know that you are interested in how we plan to take into account the

MA

uniquecharacter of the National Reconnaissance Program.

u First, let me say that the Task Group recognizes that the requirevall•11 meats and objectives of the National Reconnaissance Program are MIN

established by the United States Intelligence Board and that its executive ammo

1111111

VIM management is the responsibility of the National Reconnaissance Office.

With this in mind, the Task Group plans to inc.41de in its report a brief

ak MEM Top Secret - BYEMAN annex which would outline the prospective missions,

71111111111 payload weights, cost estimates and launch frequency of NRP satellites

n1111 Over the next decade. We would expect this annex to be prepared by

Handle via BYEMAN

Control `System Only _TOP-SECREIr

• —.•

Zia" :.1...1rar • .••••••;• AP. II ••nIi

•
Handle via BYEMAN

-TOP-SEGRET-- Control System. Only

2

the National Reconnaissance Office in accordance with requirements

established or estimated by tJSIB, and to have the annex reviewed and

approved by the NRP Executive Committee for inclusion in the Space •

Task Group report.

There will, of course, be information from the NRP which wUl

impact on some of the DOD space plans and we assume that the NRO

Will provide the DOD staff with estimates of payload weights, orbital

characteristics and frequencies of launch so that proper account can

be taken in the provisions for launch vehicles and other general

supporting activities.

Handle Ida BYEMAN

Control ystem Only ---TOP-SEGRE-T---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,453
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,401
<PP&E>                                          31,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           494
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,140
<SALES>                                         36,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,143
<CGS>                                           27,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,278)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,276)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 1, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Interprise Technology
Partners, L.P. (the "LENDER").

                                R E C I T A L S :

         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and Lender executed a Loan and
Pledge Agreement dated as of January 30, 2001 (the "LOAN DATE") in the amount of
500,000 dollars ($ 500,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to amend and modify the Loan
Agreement as of the Loan Date to clarify certain provisions.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. The ", or" shall be deleted
from the end of Section 3.5(i), and the following shall be added:

                  "or under substantially similar terms as those set forth in
this Agreement, or"

         2.       EFFECTIVE TIME OF AMENDMENT. The amendment and modification to
the Loan Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactively
effective as of the Loan Date.

         3.       NON-MODIFICATION. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the Loan Date.

                                       WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial
                                          Officer

                                       LENDER



                                       By: /s/ JC Campuzano
                                          -------------------------------------
                                       Name: JC Campuzano
                                            -----------------------------------
                                       Title: Principal
                                             ----------------------------------
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10616 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Joydeth Robinson,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 269

- 1

Before **Clement, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Joydeth Robinson pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one count of sexual exploitation of children. Her offense of conviction involved the production of an image of one of her minor daughters posed in a lewd and lascivious manner. As part of the plea agreement, the Government dismissed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has dete rmined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 18, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10616 Document: 00515786530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/18/2021No. 20

- 10616

2 an additional count of sexual exploitation of children involving her other minor daughter.
On appeal, Robinson challenges the portion of the presentence report (PSR) that included a “pseudo count” and multiple c ount enhancement
under U.S.S.G. §§ 2G2.1(d)(1) and 3D1.4 for the conduct related to the
dismissed count. She did not object in the district court, so we review for plain error. United States v. Randall , 924 F.3d 790, 795

- 96 (5th Cir. 2019).
We pretermit whether Robinson has shown an error that was clear or
obvious under Randall because she has failed to demonstrate that any error affected her substantial rights. See United States v. King , 979 F.3d 1075, 1081

- 82 (5th Cir. 2020) . With the multiple count e nhancement and a three

- level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, the PSR calculated Robinson’s
total offense level as 44, which was reduced to 43 by U.S.S.G. Ch. 5, Pt. A, cmt. n.2. Absent the multiple count enhancement, Robinson’s total offense
l evel is 42. But in both cases, the advisory guidelines sentence remains unchanged at 360 months of imprisonment because the statutory maximum term of imprisonment applies. See U.S.S.G. §5G1.1(a); King , 979 F.3d at

1081

- 82. Thus, the guidelines range is unaffected by the error , and Robinson
has otherwise failed to show any effect on her substantial rights or a miscarriage of justice

. See King , 979 F.3d at 1083.
The judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-10616 Document: 00515786530 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/18/2021
# C_2004319EN.01000602.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3602 — JABIL/PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS POLAND)

(2004/C 319/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3602. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3602. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005048EN.01000701.xml

| 24.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/7

---

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

(2005/C 48/09)

The European Parliament Secretariat is organising the following selection procedure:

| PE/92/S | — | DIRECTOR (A*/AD14)
  Relations with the Political Groups (1) |
| --- | --- | --- |

PE/92/S

—

DIRECTOR (A*/AD14)

DIRECTOR

Relations with the Political Groups (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C 48 A, 24.2.2005. (published in all the official languages of the European Union).

1

---
# C_2005019EN.01001401.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzhof by order of that court of 14 July 2004 in the case of Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land against Keller Holding GmbH

(Case C-471/04)

(2005/C 19/26)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) (Germany) of 14 July 2004, received at the Court Registry on 5 November 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land against Keller Holding GmbH on the following question:

Is it contrary to Article 52, in conjunction with Article 58, of the Treaty establishing the European Community and to Article 73b of that Treaty if financing costs incurred by a corporation which have a direct economic link to profits, not subject to tax in Germany, derived from a holding in a capital company established in another Member State may be deducted as operating expenditure only in so far as no profits from that holding are distributed on a tax-free basis?

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4904

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER P ATRICK T AYLOR , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. October 7, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and W OLF and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for A ppellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Estate of Wagner: Young, Claimant, Appellant, vs. Rylander, Administratrix, Respondent.

For the appellant: *William C. Seefeld*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: /. *B. Kitske*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.