alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      26,376,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,364,905
<PP&E>                                       5,568,514
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,484,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,547,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,234,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,863
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,301,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,547,288
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,207,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,207,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,207,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)
        

</TABLE>
. .-

( 

WQRKING PAPER, DESTROY 

OR CONTROL BY q d ( 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

OPTO-MECHANICAL DESIGN ENG,INEERING 

Memorandum ME 64 

TO: Distribution DATE: October 8, 1971 

FROM: L.B. Molaskey j 

SUBJECT: Status of RV-3 Recovery (Telecon to Cdr. Mooney, Sub Dev. Group I) 

I called Cdr. Mooney to inqure as to the status of the RV-l recovery 

tests which are continuing off San Diego. He indicated that the second dive 

had been completed but that the Trieste was unable to locate the test shape on 

. the bottom. He indicated that the Trieste surfaced about 5 miles from the target point. No explaination was given for the error. 

Cdr. Mooney indicated that a third dive is schedulJd for early Friday 

morning and suggested that I again call him to check the status. He said that 

even if they can't locate the shape that they will operate the hook on the next 

'dive to check its operation. 

I suggested, an alternate means for opening the hook, which may prove 

,to be stmpler than operating the opening mechanism. The scheme was sUnply to 

lay the closed hook on the bottom and Hft it with the mechanical arm from one 

side, stmilar to the way it was recovered on the first dive. This will allow 

the hook to open by gravity and the latch will hold it in the open position. 

,Be agreed to notify the pilots of this scheme. 

Cdr. Mooney indicated that the search ship DeSteiguer is also having 

problems. It seems, that after they left Hawaii for the recovery area they 

experienced a failure in their Loran "c" satellite navigation system and in 

their tracker. They have returned to port for repairs and are currently awaiting receipt of a part for the tracker • 

. Be agreed that tentative plans should be made to arrive in Hawaii 

about the 26th of October. He indicated that either he or Capt. Packer will 

also be going out to supervise the recovery operation and that we 'should plan 

to use the same means of transportation from Hawaii to the recovery site. He 

will make the necessary arrangements. 

LBM/cj 

cc: M. F. Maguire 

B.W. Robertson 

R.W. Jones 

C. Karatzas 

P. Petty 

R. Roylance 

J. Braddon 

_CHQS) 

L~key , 

Hx Sf-CRET W.):~X!~"'G PAPER, DESTROY 

OR CONiROL BY '0 .• '7" ,o.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 18, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------------ | --------------------
|                         | John P. Manning     
|                         | Director, President 
|                         | (Principal Executive
|                         | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                         | Assignor Corp.
r

AP

b 40 C LI .,1.-.. CONTRO

NANO-S %ft

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

September 22, 1971

• *." •

i•

•

As you know, I have been asked informally I.

by Ambassador Johnson's assistant for the

subject of Dr. Mamas' visit on the 30th.

Since I have promised to call State back on

the matter, a question arises as to whether i•.• • la

or not Dr. Mamas desires to telegraph the

topic ahead of time. Do you *tree that my

call should be very general in answering the -••

State question? ".r,gicT oF 4 vi nNA......47;11.4e..

Next, it might be profitable for Dr.

Mamas to receive a short briefing on the

156 Committee activity since July, i.e.,

SKYLAB and the status of our letter on SALT

ratification. Of interest to Dr. 2.1cLucas

should be the way in which State is on the one

band attempting to protect the NRC via the 156

and on the other band giving an impression of

favoring relaxation of the "fact of." I would

be pleased to provide this kind of rundown to

w* Dr. Hama.. .ete--..4 40 •

• •

. • HANDLE VI

• !'•• •CONTROL SY

.

. .; . •

• .r.-0

r•IT4e11'

-

.

.. • r
40P-SECRET-

--4St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF September 20, 1971

..$164 116111111WWWINA

'

. •

. •

. • '

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: NSAM 156 Committee Report, Use of Earth Terrain

Camera on SKYLAB

••

ri

.0

V

{-;

1:

•

6%

zr4.

A ' 7 To the right is a copy of Ambaisador Johnson's letter .a

.j.g which transmits the Report to Dr. Kissinger. The letter

makes three points. First, the use of the earth terrain

camera aboard SKYLAB is recommended for approval, as an

exception to policy and not as a revision to the guidelines. Second, mention is made of the Soviet's questions

at the UN relative to legal, political and economic aspects

of earth resource survey satellites. Finally, Dr. Cline

4 4.

• has been tasked to provide an initial review of China's

attitudes towards satellite reconnaissance.

Recommendation: None, this memorandum is for your

information.

As you will recall, Dr. Naka and I attended the

NSAM 156 working group meeting in July. Subsequent to

that meeting we provided inputs for the final paper. The

paper was acceptable to us and you provided concurrence.

There was no need for a meeting of the principals.
#### *HENRY W. FAISON v. H. BOWDEN, Executor.

*Statute of Limitations*— *New Pomise.*

1. An acknowledgment of a debt, barred by the statute of limitations, in the following language, viz : “I owe A a considerable sum, $1,000 or :$1.,200, and I reckon more, and I want it paid. A is not uneasy about it,” is not sufficient to take the case out of the operation of the statute.

:2. An acknowledgment or promise in order to take the case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, must be made to the *creditor himself.*'

*’(Parker,*Adm’r. v. *Shnford,*Adm'r. *ante*219, cited and approved.)

Civil AotioN, tried at Fall Term, 1876, of WayNE Supe-Tior Court, before Seymour, *J.*

The suit was brought to recover the amount of a medical ■bill against the testator of defendant, running from 1854 to 1861. The defendant relied on the statute of limitations. {See 72 N. C. 405.)

ITis Honor held that the statute was no bar to any part of plaintiff's claim. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Messrs. Smith Strong*and *S. F. Grainger,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Battle Mordecai*and *J. L. Stewart,*for defendant.

*

 Faircloth, J. being of counsel in the Court below did not sit at the hearing of this case.

Reade, J.

This case was before us and is reported in 72 N. C. 405. It wras held that the acknowledgment of the debt was too vague and indefinite to take the case out of the ■operation of the statute of limitations. The acknowledgment now is a little different from what it was then, but it is still liable to the same objection.

The acknowledgment relied upon now is, “I owe Dr. Fai-son a considerable sum — $1,000 or $1,200, and I reckon *426more, and I want it paid. Dr. Eaison is not uneasy about it.” Now what did he owe him about ? He does not say. Probably it was for medical services; it may have been for a tract of land ; it was probably an account; it may have been a bond. No paper was shown or referred to. No-amount was fixed; probably it was $1,000; it may have been $1,200 ; it was claimed to have been more than $1,900.

The evil of allowing vague acknowledgments or careless, promises and these dependent upon the memory of witnesses-to bring to life a debt which was dead, has been remedied, none too soon, by a statute which requires all such acknowledgments and promises to be in writing. But that statute was subsequent to this claim and does not affect it.

There is another objection which is fatal to the plaintiff; the acknowledgment was not made to the plaintiff, but to a stranger.

Ve have decided at this time in *Parker,*Adm’r. v. *Shu*ford, Adm’r. that the acknowledgment or promise must be to-the creditor himself. See that case and the authorities them cited, which it is unnecessary to repeat.

There is error.

Per Curiam. *Venire de novo..*
# Pond Sealing or Lining-Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner (No.) (521) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Pond Sealing or Lining-Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner (No.) (521) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Pond Sealing or Lining-Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner (No.) (521).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

521 NHCP CPS Pond Sealing or Lining Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner 2023(828.96 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

521 NHCP PO Pond Sealing or Lining Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner 2023(152.74 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
GENERAL LEDGER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,486
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,609
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        193,271
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (1,290)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,654
<DEPOSITS>                                     214,350
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,061
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,783
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 256,654
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,606
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,333
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   156
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,095
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,742
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,353
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      465
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    978
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         610
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        602
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    24
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,191
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      223
<RECOVERIES>                                        48
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005141EN.01001801.xml

| 10.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/18

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3811 — Lagardère/France Télévisions/JV)

(2005/C 141/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004

On 26 April 2005, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between Lagardère/France Télévisions/JV. On 3 June 2005, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
# C_2004284EN.01001602.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 September 2004

in Case T-342/02: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Extent of the obligation of examination - Conversion into a national trade-mark application - Article 58 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 284/33)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-342/02: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp., established in Santa Monica, California (United States), represented by F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, E. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: S. Laitinen and D. Botis), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Moser Grupo Media SL, established in Santa Eulalia del Rio (Spain) — action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2002 (Case R 437/2001-3) declaring inadmissible the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division relating to opposition proceedings between Moser Grupo Media SL and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp., — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,763,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,903,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,151,168
<PP&E>                                       6,150,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,083,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,509,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,067,862
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,257
<OTHER-SE>                                  77,491,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,506,639
<SALES>                                      2,505,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,505,706
<CGS>                                        1,646,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,574,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,601,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,601,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143327

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143327 COA: 299693 Monroe CC: 08-036595-FH MELVIN DEON MALLOY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing ent itlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).