alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.3



State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 10:48 AM 02/20/2007
FILED 10:48 AM 02/20/2007
SRV 070188109 - 2309979 FILE




STATE OF DELAWARE

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



The corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:



FIRST:That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of AVAX Technologies, Inc., resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:



RESOLVED, that an amendment to Article FOURTH of
the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation to read in its entirety as follows, be submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Corporation for their approval in accordance with Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:



FOURTH:  (A)(1) The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Five Hundred Five Million (505,000,000), of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares, having a par value of $.01 per share, shall be designated Preferred Stock and Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) shares, having a par value of $.004 per share, shall be designated Common Stock.



SECOND:That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.



THIRD:That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this 15th day of February, 2007.





/s/ Richard P. RaineyRichard P. Rainey, President




---
Off 

cm mg

wan

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OP SWIM

WASHINGTON 21, D.C.

1111111MNIPM

3, 1963

7'1- 43

•

16.• two • •••••n

•• • *. • •• •••n 4.'a I COPIES

•s. MEMORANDUM OR Dr. McMillan

Dr. Irubini

SUBJECT: NW/JCS Operations Center

The attached exchange of correspondence

between Director McCone and me on the above

subject should, I believe, be self-explanatory.

Will the two of you, working with the JCS, prepare

a simplified form of agreementaalong the lines

mentioned in Mr. McCone's and my letters, covering the arrangements agreed upon between D/NRO

and JCS on the reconnaissance operations conducted

for NRO by DoD elements.

&cm .24.•••-

Attachments

•
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1270 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reliable Investment 

5 in Vital Energy Reauthorization Act’’ or the ‘‘RIVER 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES. 

8 Section 242(g) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

9 U.S.C. 15881(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fisVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:22 May 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1270.IS S1270

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1270 IS

1 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis2 cal years 2016 through 2025’’. 

3 SEC. 3. HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT. 

4 Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fis6 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis7 cal years 2016 through 2025’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


                                D.R. HORTON, INC.

                            1991 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                                   (Restated)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     As of February 27, 2001, the Board of Directors of D.R. Horton, Inc.
declared an 11% stock dividend payable in shares of its common stock. To give
effect to such stock dividend, the Committee has amended the D.R. Horton, Inc.
1991 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the "Plan"), in the
following respects:

     1. The first sentence of Paragraph 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:

          The shares of Common Stock and any other Company Security which may be
     (a) sold upon the exercise of Option Rights, (b) delivered upon the
     exercise of Appreciation Rights, (c) granted or sold as Restricted Stock
     and released from substantial risks of forfeiture and restrictions on
     transfer thereof or (d) delivered in payment of any Performance Units or as
     Performance Shares (or in lieu thereof), shall not exceed in the aggregate
     8,040,373 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 10 of this
     Plan.

     2. In all other respects, the Plan as previously approved is hereby
ratified and confirmed. March 9, 2001

                                     D.R. Horton, Inc.


                                     By:   /s/ Samuel R. Fuller
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                     Samuel R. Fuller, Executive Vice President,
                                     Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                     Attest:


                                     /s/ Paul W. Buchschacher
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Paul W. Buchschacher, Assistant Secretary
J. W. Plummer

r

JrP-PiECRE

yjNATIONALRECONNAISSANCEOFFICE

WASHINGTON. 0.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR S May 1975

•

•

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INTELLIGENCE)

SUBJECT: NRP Residual Air Vehicle Assets

As you are aware, nine OXCART (A-12) aircraft and

17 TAGBOARD (D-21) drone reconnaissance vehicles and associated spares, subsystems, cameras and ground support equipment

have been in permanent storage since the 1968 and 1971 time

frames, respectively. These NRP a an

acquisition value approximating and are

In view of the ExCom's previous position on air vehicles,

the improbable NRO requirement for these assets, and the

potential application for selected items (engines and cameras)

within the USAF/DOD inventory, I propose to initiate the

following NRO inventory liquidation actions:

Dispose of all OXCART and TAGBOARD assets, with

the exception of air vehicles, over a 24-month period, commencing as soon as possible. The priority order for transferring items on a demand basis wil ) SR-71 program;

(2) other USAF/DOD activities; (3, quipment pool,

and (4) salvage.

Develop a plan providing for the ultimate

disposal of OXCART and TAGBOARD air vehicles. I believe

separate action is necessary for these assets due to the

unique security and cost problems associated with this asps

of liquidation. I would envision purging these assets freaete

the inventory during FY77.

I request your concurrence in these proposed actions.

.41 CLMW4111111AMM moo

esessaft essainve siellelIMM1111011111011661,

sow Mg 1001.1111119“ Os WI at PAO“

OP COPIES
Biomass Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 04/08/2008 

 

Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Thermochemical Conversion Processes 

Gasification 

In gasification conversion, lignocellulosic feedstocks such as wood and forest products are broken down to 

synthesis gas, primarily carbon monoxide and hydrogen, using heat. The feedstock is then partially 

oxidized, or reformed with a gasifying agent (air, oxygen, or steam), which produces synthesis gas 

(syngas). The makeup of syngas will vary due to the different types of feedstocks, their moisture content, 

the type of gasifier used, the gasification agent, and the temperature and pressure in the gasifier. 

 

Gas Cleanup and Conditioning 

The syngas produced undergoes clean-up and conditioning to create a contaminant-free gas having the 

appropriate hydrogen-carbon monoxide ratio prior to the catalytic conversion step. 

Among the contaminants removed during clean-up are tars, acid gas, ammonia, alkali metals, and other 

particulates. 

Syngas is then conditioned: hydrogen sulfide levels are reduced by sulfur polishing, and hydrogen-carbon 

monoxide ratio is adjusted using water-gas shift. 

Pyrolysis 

In pyrolysis processing, biomass feedstocks are broken down using heat in the absence of oxygen, 

producing a biooil that can be further refined to a hydrocarbon product. The decomposition occurs at lower 

temperatures than gasification processes, and produces liquid oil instead of a synthesis gas. Oil produced 

varies in oxygen content or viscosity according to the feedstock used. 

 

Bio-Oil Cleanup 

Oil produced in pyrolysis processing must have particulates and ash removed in filtration to create a 

homogenous product. The oil is then upgraded to hydrocarbon fuels via hydrotreating and hydrocracking 

processing, which reduces its total oxygen content. 

Printable Version 

Site Map 

EERE Information Center 

Programs and Offices 

Quick Links 

z

z

z

z

z

z

Biomass FAQs

Program Overview

Program Research

Financial 

Opportunities

Publications

Contact Us

Biomass Program: Thermochemical Conversion Processes Page 1 of 1

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/thermochemical_processes.html 7/20/2010
Exhibit 4.3(A)

                                                  Form of Certificate of Trust




                            CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                    Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 200_-_

     This Certificate of Trust of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 200_-_ (the
"Trust"), dated as of ________ __, 200_ is being duly executed and filed by
_____________ __________, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form
a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C.ss.3801 et
seq.).

     1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Chase Manhattan
Auto Owner Trust 200_-_.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware is ----------------
--------------------------------------------------.

     3. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date filed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the Trust,
has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.

                              _______________________, not in its
                              individual capacity but solely as
                              trustee of the Trust


                              By:      ______________________________
                                       Name:
                                       Title:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 10.32


               ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT

        This ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT (this
"Addendum") is effective December 1, 1998 between Sunrise Hospital and Medical
Center, LLC, d/b/a as Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, a Nevada corporation
("Medical Center"), and GK Financing, LLC, a California limited liability
company ("GKF").

                                    RECITALS

        WHEREAS, on June 3, 1999, GKF and Medical Center executed a Lease
Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit (the "Original Lease");

        WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the terms and provisions of the
Original Lease as set forth herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT

        1. DEFINED TERMS. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meaning set forth in the Original Lease.

        2. COSTS OF SITE PREPARATION; COSTS OF INSTALLATION. Section 4 of the
original lease is hereby amended as follows:

        In the event that Sunrise's Gamma Knife program does not perform at
least * procedures in its first year of operation, GKF shall reimburse Sunrise
for * of its Gamma Knife installation costs.

        In the event that Sunrise's Gamma Knife program does not perform at
least * procedures in its second year of operation, GKF shall reimburse Sunrise
for * of its Gamma Knife installation costs.

        3. FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. Except as otherwise amended hereby or provided
herein, all of the terms and provisions of the Original Lease shall remain in
full force and effect.


<PAGE>   2


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum effective as
of the date first written above.


           "MEDICAL CENTER"            Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center



           BY:
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jerald F. Mitchell, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer



           "GKF"                       GK Financing, LLC



           BY:
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Craig K. Tagawa, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1235

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to authorize Regional 
 Corporations and Village Corporations to establish energy assistance 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2015

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to authorize Regional 
 Corporations and Village Corporations to establish energy assistance 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Native Energy Assistance 
Program Act''.

SEC. 2. SHAREHOLDER ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 7 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1606) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(s) Shareholder Energy Assistance Program.--A Regional 
Corporation or Village Corporation may establish an energy assistance 
program that provides to shareholders financial assistance for the 
payment of residential electric bills, the cost of home weatherization 
or energy efficiency improvements, or the purchase of transportation 
fuels.''.
    (b) Taxation.--Section 21 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1620) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Energy Assistance.--Any assistance provided to shareholders 
under an energy assistance program established under section 7(s) shall 
not be subject to any form of Federal taxation.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005132EN.01000402.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 14 April 2005

in Case C-110/03: Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for anuulment - Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 - Horizontal State aid - Aid for employment - Legal certainty - Subsidiarity - Proportionality - Coherence of Community action - Non-discrimination - Regulation (EC) No 994/98 - Objection of illegality)

(2005/C 132/08)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-110/03 Kingdom of Belgium (Agents: initially A. Snoecx, and subsequently by E. Dominkovits, assisted D. Waelbroeck and D. Brinckman) v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Rozet) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought before the Court on 10 March 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet, J. P. Puissochet, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur) and U. Lõhmus, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.05.2003.

1

---
Pages 75-76 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*

# Pages 79-80 - *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*Page 81 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
July 1, 2015

Mr. Jeremy Hintz

Sensorflight, LLC

3141 FM 3512

Aransas Pass, TX 78336

Dear Mr. Hintz:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ 61.113(a), 61.113(b), 91.119(c) , 91.121, 91.151(a)

, 91.405(a)

, 91.407(a)(1)

, 91.409(a)(1)

, 91.409(a)(2) , and 91.417(a) and (b); of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 24, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Sensorflight, LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA− 20 15

− 1332 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request an y further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear F rom You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

B rittany New ton

Program Analyst

, Air men and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
DOWNGRADED.AT 3 YEAR INTERVALS; 

DB3LASSIFIED Ann 12 rams. 

. DOD DIR. 5200.10..':.. 

■ 

• 

DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING • 

WASHINGTON 25, D.C. 

2 9 APR 1964 

moRANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OP THE AIR FORCE 

SUBJECT: Approval of USAF FY 1964 MAE Manned Orbiting laboratory 

(MOL) Program 

The following program approval action is taken, subject to the avail-• 

ability of funds: 

($ Thousands) 

Program 

Program Approved Total 

Program Previously by this Program 

Element No. Title Programmed Approved Action Approved 

6.34.09.40.4 MIL 10,000 6,000 6,00o 

Based on the (1) "Preliminary Technical Development Plan-for the Manned 

Laboratory (MOL)" dated April 1964 (2) Memorandum from the 

Aslistant Secretary of the Air Force (R&D) to this office, subject: 

":.:anned Orbiting Laboratory Program (MOL)" dated 10 April 1964 (3) Memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (R&D) to this office, 

subject: "Work Statements for OSS Study," dated 18 March 1964 (4) Memorandum from this office to the Secretary of Defense, subject: "Initiation 

of MOL Pre-Phase I," dated 21 April 1964, program approval in the amount 

of (a) $5.5M is granted for the pre-definition activities outlined in the 

Preliminary Technical Development Plan cited above (b) $.5M is granted 

with the understanding that it will be made available to the Department . 

of the Navy for support of their MOL experimental studies program. 

The approval to proceed with the pre-definition activities is subject to 

the following; 

• • 

1. Before negotiating contracts.for APOLLO and one-man GEMINI studies, 

it is requested that you submit the proposed work statements to my office 

for approval. 

2. Consistent with guidance contained in item (3) of the above 

paragraph on OSS studies, 

should be deleted from, your planning unless the Air Force can 

present reasons to this office for its compelling importance. 

3. In all experimental studies, I request that you give particular L/ 

emphasis to any opportunities to perform ground simulation testing. 

• 
2 

Although the Preliminary Technical Development Plan for this program is 

satisfactory for the purpose of initiating pre definition studios, the 

remainder of such Plan, as recognized in your memorandum cited in the 

first paragraph above, may need extensive modification, before approval 

can be granted. The Air Force should consider carefully the relation 

between the rapidity with which the program proceeds and the overall 

cost (including boosters) to the (Ferment. 

In conclusion, it is requested that the pre-definition studies provide 

the necessary information so as to permit the completio4 of a firs 

Technical Development Plan by mid-September 464. 

This action, has been coordinated with the ASD(Comoroller) as to avail• 

ability of fund resources and for amendment of listings of programs 

approved for finenCirg.