alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005045EN.01001701.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/17

---

Action brought on 8 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

Commission of the European Communities

Republic of Austria

(Case C-508/04)

(2005/C 45/31)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 December 2004, by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Van Beek and B. Schima acting as Agents, assisted by M. Lang, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

Republic of Austria

Commission of the European Communities

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligation to transpose, correctly and completely, Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 (1) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora by not transposing, correctly and completely, Articles 1, 6(1) to (4), 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16(1) and 22(b) of that directive into Austrian law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligation to transpose, correctly and completely, Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 (1) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora by not transposing, correctly and completely, Articles 1, 6(1) to (4), 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16(1) and 22(b) of that directive into Austrian law.

1

| 2. | Order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this application the Commission is challenging the defective transposition into Austrian law of Directive 92/43/EEC by means of the relevant legal provisions of the provinces of Carinthia, Niederösterreich, Oberösterreich, Salzburg, Steiermark, Tyrol and Vorarlberg notified to the Commission or to its knowledge adopted.

In the Commission's view, the following provisions concerning individual federal provinces have not been completely or correctly transposed: Definitions (Article 1 of the directive); necessary conservation measures (Article 6(1)); prohibition on deterioration (Article 6(2)); plans or projects which could have serious implications for special areas of conservation (Article 6(3) and (4)); in regard to the system of protection under the ‘wild birds’ Directive 79/409/EEC (Article 7); surveillance of conservation status (Article 11); system of protection for animal species listed in Annex 1V(a) (Article 12); system of protection for plant species listed in Annex IV(b) (Article 13); prohibited means of capture and killing (Article 15); criteria for derogation from Articles 12 to 15 (Article 16(1)); deliberate introduction of non-native species (Article 22(b)).

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7.

1

---
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114978 ;: 1'" 

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301 

8 December 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: Consolidation of CIA and SAC U-2 Fleet (TS) 

In view of the costs of maintaining separate U -2 

fleet::, and considering the marginal utility of the CHINAT 

Idealist program, I feel that U-2 consolidation under SAC 

should be irnplemented as soon as practicable. While 

Dick Helms has agreed to a consideration of such a proposal, actual agreement and the timing of such action has 

not been resolved. 

Please prepare for me, by 15 February 1970, a 

plan that consolidates the U-Zs in the Strategic Air Command. 

I shall thereafter use this plan as a basis for further discussions with Dick Helms. 

s 

GROUP 1 

/ from aulofflfttic 

\JOWl\l"lldklll snd daclauification 

HAf.rOLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROC SYSTEM ONCY, 

Ooir, 'llo-.l. or _2-- Oopiea 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114978
# C_2005143EN.01003001.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/30

---

Removal from the register of Case C-57/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 143/51)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 10 January 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-57/04 Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.

---

(1)  OJ C 85 of 03.04.2004.

1

---
Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140943 HANDLf VIA 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

~ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

December 20, 1973 

MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARY SCHLESINGER 

The memorandum at the right for your signature will effect 

the appointment of Mr. James W. Plummer as Director of the NRO 

in accordance with the DOD/CIA Agreement of August 11, 1965 and 

DOD Directive TS 5105.23 (at TABS A and B respectively). 

A copy of my appointment is at TAB C. 

(. 

McLucas 

l 

HANDLE VIA CLASSlflEO 8'1' BYEMAN · 1 EXEMPT FROM 

BYEMAN GENERALOECLASSIFICATIONSCHEOULEOF lOP SECRET CONTROL NO ____ _ 

EXECLITIVE OROEA 1165:£ EXEMPTION CATE· 

CONTROL SYSTEM GORY !>82 DECLASSIFY ON IMP nET, 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140943 

COPY OF 

PAGE OF 

COPIES 

PAGES
# C_2004323EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 December 2004

(2004/C 323/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3608 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9883 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5426 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,09 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5796 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,495 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6967 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4346 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0650 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 481 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,74 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,793 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 849 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7477 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6579 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5861 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8897 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,2323 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6746 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3608

JPY

Japanese yen

140,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9883

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5426

ISK

Iceland króna

84,09

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5796

CZK

Czech koruna

30,495

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6967

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4346

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0650

ROL

Romanian leu

39 481

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,74

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,793

TRL

Turkish lira

1 849 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7477

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6579

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5861

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8897

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,2323

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,66

ZAR

South African rand

7,6746

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005106EN.01001903.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten by order of that court of 15 October 2004 in Skatteverket v A and B

(Case C-102/05)

(2005/C 106/37)

Language of the case: Swedish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Regeringsrätten (Supreme Administrative Court) (Sweden) of 15 October 2004, received at the Court Registry on 28 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Skatteverket (Tax Board) and A and B on the following questions:

| 1. | Is it contrary to the provisions on free movement of capital between the Member States and third countries, in a situation like the present case, for A and B to be taxed less favourably in respect of dividends from X because X's subsidiary Y conducts business in Russia rather than in Sweden? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it contrary to the provisions on free movement of capital between the Member States and third countries, in a situation like the present case, for A and B to be taxed less favourably in respect of dividends from X because X's subsidiary Y conducts business in Russia rather than in Sweden?

| 2. | Does it have any relevance whether A and B acquired shares in X before or after business in Russia was commenced or modified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does it have any relevance whether A and B acquired shares in X before or after business in Russia was commenced or modified?

---
EXHIBIT 10.22

                       Terms of Director Cash Compensation
                            Effective January 1, 2005

         CN Bancorp Inc. does not currently pay any fees to its directors.

         County  National  Bank  does  not  currently  pay any  fees  to  inside
directors. An inside director is a director who is also an employee of the bank.
At the  present  time there are two inside  directors,  Jan W. Clark and John G.
Warner.

         Outside  directors of County  National Bank are paid $600 per month for
meetings attended.  Outside directors who are members of the executive committee
of the  board  of  directors  receive  an  additional  $300 per  month.  Outside
directors  who are members of the loan  committee and perform  appraisal  review
services  receive  an  additional  $250 per month  regardless  of the  number of
reviews performed. Outside directors receive $50 for any other committee meeting
attended.
# C_2005030EN.01002201.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/22

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3661 — CDP/STMICROELECTRONICS)

(2005/C 30/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3661. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3661. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(xv)


                  Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Plan

      RESOLVED, further, that the Supplemental Retirement Plan ("SERP")
      maintained by the Company is amended effective for all SERP participants
      who had not commenced receipt of their benefits under the SERP as of
      December 1, 1999 to provide that (a) any SERP participant whose qualified
      retirement plan benefit is determined under the account option formula may
      elect a lump sum form of payment of the participant's SERP benefits upon
      retirement or other termination provided the lump sum election is in place
      at least one year prior to the date benefit payments commence, (b) any
      such SERP participant who elects to receive a lump sum benefit will earn
      simple interest from the date of employment termination until the date of
      distribution based on the "Periodic Interest Rate" as defined in the
      underlying qualified retirement plan and (c) each SERP participant
      employed by the Company at the time of the consummation of a change in
      control shall be fully vested in his or her accrued benefit under the
      SERP; and

      RESOLVED, further, that the Authorized Officers and other appropriate
      representatives of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized,
      empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to
      execute such certificates, instruments and documents and take any and all
      other such actions as such officers or representatives shall deem
      necessary, advisable or appropriate in order to amend the SERP and carry
      out the intent and purpose of the foregoing resolutions, the taking of any
      such action to be deemed conclusive evidence that the Board and the
      Company have authorized such action.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT Eagle Oil & Gas Co. , * From the 238th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CV

- 46,196

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00290

- CV * October 31, 2013

TRO

- X, L.P. , * Opinion by McCall , J. Dissenting Opinion by Wright, C.J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Hill, sitting by assignment ) AND (Willson, J., not participating)

TRO

- X, L.P.,

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00290

- CV
Eagle Oil & Gas Partners, LLC,
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion : We reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment wherein it held that Eagle Oil & Gas Co. had breached the New Prospects Agreement as found by the jury in Question Nos. 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c). We render judgment that TRO

- X , L.P. take nothing in that re gard from Eagle Oil & Gas Co . We affirm the judgment that TRO

- X take nothing from Eagle Oil & Gas Partners , LLC. We render judgment that TRO

- X recover the sum of $379,788.80 ($1,064,789.45 due to TRO

- X less $685,000.65 in expenses due to Eagle Oil & Gas Co. ) as shown by the accounting. We reverse the award of attorney fees and render judgment that TRO

- X take nothing in this appeal for attorney fees.
#### Davlin, Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan,*attorneys, and *John L. Newman,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Fawsett & Shea,*attorneys, and *C. F. Mikkelson*and *Ray T. McCann,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
1

                                  Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Annual Report of Symons International Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date herof (the 'Report"), I , Douglas
H.  Symons,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sction 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d)  of  the  Securieties  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company  as  of  and  for  the  periods  stated  therein.


Dated:  June  3,  2003                    By:     /s/Bruce  K.  Dwyer
        --------------                            -------------------
                                                     Bruce  K.  Dwyer
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10616

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joydeth Robinson, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-269-1

Before Clement, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Joydeth Robinson pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one 

count of sexual exploitation of children. Her offense of conviction involved 

the production of an image of one of her minor daughters posed in a lewd and 

lascivious manner. As part of the plea agreement, the Government dismissed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10616 Document: 00515786530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/18/2021
No. 20-10616

2

an additional count of sexual exploitation of children involving her other 

minor daughter.

On appeal, Robinson challenges the portion of the presentence report 

(PSR) that included a “pseudo count” and multiple count enhancement 

under U.S.S.G. §§ 2G2.1(d)(1) and 3D1.4 for the conduct related to the 

dismissed count. She did not object in the district court, so we review for 

plain error. United States v. Randall, 924 F.3d 790, 795-96 (5th Cir. 2019).

We pretermit whether Robinson has shown an error that was clear or 

obvious under Randall because she has failed to demonstrate that any error 

affected her substantial rights. See United States v. King, 979 F.3d 1075, 1081-

82 (5th Cir. 2020). With the multiple count enhancement and a three-level 

reduction for acceptance of responsibility, the PSR calculated Robinson’s 

total offense level as 44, which was reduced to 43 by U.S.S.G. Ch. 5, Pt. A, 

cmt. n.2. Absent the multiple count enhancement, Robinson’s total offense 

level is 42. But in both cases, the advisory guidelines sentence remains 

unchanged at 360 months of imprisonment because the statutory maximum 

term of imprisonment applies. See U.S.S.G. §5G1.1(a); King, 979 F.3d at 

1081-82. Thus, the guidelines range is unaffected by the error, and Robinson 

has otherwise failed to show any effect on her substantial rights or a 

miscarriage of justice. See King, 979 F.3d at 1083.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10616 Document: 00515786530 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/18/2021
1,%1' NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFiCE 

WASHINGTON, D,C. 

PCL-, A -c;- t!"'~ c' , : J 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

JFi'.':E JP 7rlE DEPUTY DIRECTOR 1400024411 D 

1'1" ,.O!..£ VIA 

!",;-:FJn f): ~ U. l....dr..·J CCilllTRvl SY~T£J4 

.. 

April 28, 1967 

ME~;oRANDUM FOR DR. FLAX 

SUBJECT: United States Intelligence Board Meeting 

April 27, 1967 

In its ~onsideration of the subject of decontrol or 

downgrading of TALENT-KEYHOLE materials, the USIB reached 

agreement on three matters: 

a. That the fact Of the collection of 

satellite photography be acknowledged at the 

SECRET level,. 

b. That more liberalized procedures 

should be devised to permit publication of 

satellite-derived intelligence in reports at 

the SECRET and TOP SECRET levels to iriclude 

a simple statement c'onfirming the satellite 

source. 

c. That the photography itself not be 

released from the System although COMOR should 

consider simplification of procedures related 

to approval for sanitization of selected photography to permit its use by Strike Forces. 

The COMOR has.been asked to submit to the Board the 

detailed procedures whereby pOint b. above would be accomplished. Board approval of such procedures will precede 

action with regard to the first decision. At that time 

the Board will.haveto conclude upon the procedure whereby 

relevant Government officials are advised of the fact of 

United States collection by satellite means. 

The Board also agreed to recommend the use of one of 

the remainil1 g G's: to meet the GMAIC requirement for repeate.d 

GAMBIT CONTROL NO In t erna I .~[;'i)r.:'? ~ UJL' JJr;:~ COpy c?- OF' COPI(S 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRAOING 

DOD OIR£.C'fIVE S200.10 ODES .... NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101960 

--:=--

PAGE I or 2 PAGES 

-

-
, , ...... 

.. . 

) • Approved for

n 

~~~: I~?] 1~/p2/01 C051}01960 

~ V"-\U1"\~I!...W -. 

coverage of certain missile test facilities. It also 

recommends the standby G for the aborted G3 mission be 

used as promptly as feasible. 

The Board expressed an understandable concern that 

the repetitive coverage G mi~sion and the G3 for June be 

so launched as not to interfere with one another. This 

will obviously be taken into account by General Martin. 

It also, of course l bears some relation to NPIC's receipt 

of the film from the two missions which I am sure will be 

discussed in-the near future by COMOR at which time 

Colonel How~rd will participate in the discussion. 

Copy I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Dr. Flax 

SS-5 

SS-3 

RF 

RD-2 

- (LA. I,' ~L o _) rj)1t1M' .LV ¥u-. 

James, Q.Reber 

HANDLE VIA 

- GAMBIT CONrAOL NO Internal 

iT!r.if!'\ it· " iJio?t 1"7 

u lin'" ~lC.lu[\(lC. u- exCI.UDED fROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 OIRECTlV~ 5200,10 DOES Nor APPLV 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101960 

COPV_--=-_OF ___ COPI£S 

P' G [_...;;2",--_ of_-=2=---_ P AG (S 

I 

i 

- 1 

-
c 

• 

MINISTERE DE L'ECOLOGIE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE 

ET DE L'ENERGIE 

Direction generale de /'Aviation civile 

Direction du Transport a€rien 

Sous-direction des Transporteurs et Services aeriens 

0 l 'i Reference: 1 3 - "l\ ' /DTA/SDT 

Affaire suivie par : Virginie FIOUX 

virginie.fioux@aviation-civile.gouv.fr 

Tel. +33158 os 37 71- Fax : +33158 os 38 65 

Objet: : Reciprocity certificate 

Dear Sir, 

Paris, le 2 3 AVR. 2013 

-

M. Paul GRETCH 

Director of Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street S.W. 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

USA 

Further to the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed in Washington on 30 April 

2007 between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America and 

the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed on 18 June 1998 between the 

Government of the French Republic and the Government of the United States as amended, the 

French civil aviation authorities herewith confirm that they will grant, on the basis of reciprocity, 

rights to U.S. air carriers to provide non scheduled flights to/from the French territory. 

This letter will remain valid 12 months after its date of signature. 

Yours sincerely. 

~ i 

£ 

Present 

pour 

l'avenir