alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES US TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9
<PP&E>                                             422
<DEPRECIATION>                                     138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5
<BONDS>                                            338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINCE BLAKELY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 22-35402

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05168-EFS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2023** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Vince Blakely appeals the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of

benefits. Blakely asserted disability based on hearing defects, obsessive

compulsive disorder, anxiety, depression, and mood swings. 

FILED

JUN 7 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s rejection of Licensed Medical

Health Counselor Mr. Shepley’s opinions as to Blakely’s disabilities because they

were not consistent with or supported by the evidence in the record. The ALJ

properly relied on the testimony of Drs. Buitrago and Bruner, and Blakely has

failed to show that any error was consequential to the ALJ’s ultimate decision. 

The ALJ reasonably interpreted the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

(“DVR”) reports within the context of the record to conclude that Blakely’s lack of

success with DVR services was likely due to his own choices and that the DVR

records tended to undermine some of Blakely’s symptom reports and medical

opinions. Substantial evidence also supports the ALJ’s clear and convincing

reasons for discounting Blakely’s symptom reports, most notably that some of

Blakely’s testimony was inconsistent with his own prior statements and other

evidence. 

Blakely has failed to show reversible error in steps one or two. At step one,

the ALJ made clear that for much of the period of time at issue Blakely was not

involved in substantial gainful activity, and thus did not deny Blakely’s claim. 

Blakely fails to show consequential error at step two. See Burch v. Barnhart, 400

F.3d 676, 682 (9th Cir. 2005). 

2
Finally, substantial evidence supports the finding that given Blakely’s

vocational factors and the testimony from a vocational expert, Blakely would be

able to work in other jobs existing in significant numbers. 

AFFIRMED. 

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      338
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,789
<PP&E>                                           4,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,768
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (35,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,250
<SALES>                                          2,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,526
<CGS>                                            1,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (456)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF STATE immmignomi

Wawdogten. O.C. MO I

•

October 16, 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPACE POLICY COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP

SUBJECT: Study. of US Space Policy

v N.r -0

Attached are the initial submissions for our study 

SEM on the Relationships Between Civil and Intelligence

111

Earth Sensing Programs. I have made no effort at this

stage to try to tie together the initial draf:ls, to

ma identify gaps or overlaps. Rather, I thought that you

111111111 would each like to receive these initial drafts as agia soon as possible.

MOIR

of section have not yet been prepared for some parts

III of the study outline, since it is

envisioned that they will address some of the central

issues and attempted answers at this stage would be

En premature. Instead, we have attempted to break down

NM in somewhat more detail the questions and Auggest an

11.111 analytical approach for item and d4B has drawn

gm up a more general issues paper. An initial draft of

aims section III will be attempted at a later stage; in the

meantime comments, suggestions, or inputs for this

U; section would be welcomed.

IONE It should he noted that the State Department NMI contributions (II.8.3, 11.0.4, I1I.F, II.D.1, III.B,

IOW= II.B.1) have not been coordinated fully within the

mum. Department, and therefore co not represent official

Min State Department positions. Neither do they necessarily

NM reflect my own views.

11111111

It is our intention to meet with each of the agencies

Lt.'s= individually to discuss these initial drafts, and, where

appropriate, suggest mdifications to then before we

w

\1111

circulate a first consolidated draft. I will be in touch

411111 with you shortly to arrange for uch a meeting.

Attachments

Leon Sloss

Chairman

Space Policy Working Group

Bureau of Politico-Military

Affairs

TCS 38658-75

CY _2_-_-
:;".•4 4 4, • I)

Distribution:

Mr. S. .Neil Hosenball, NASA

Lt. Col. Harold Coyle, DOD/SAFSS

Dr. Amrom H. Katz, ACDA

Capt. Robert W. Curran, JCS

Dr. James Wade, OSD/ISA

Mr. Wreath Gathright, State-S/P

Mr. William Radlinski, Interior/USCS

Mr. Russell Drew, NSF

Mr. Weiss, White House (CIEP)

CODEWORD Attachments as follows:

STATE TCS 38659-75 - Section II D, pp 1-6, 14-20 only

Interior/USCS TCS 910844-75

DOD TCS 566519.& 566528-75

OMB/NASA - Secret Non Codeword attachments

As'
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report of United
Systems Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report"). I, Randall L. McGee, Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company.


Date: August 15, 2005                            By: /s/ Randall L. McGee
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Randall L. McGee, Secretary
                                                     and Treasurer
                                                     (Principal Financial and
                                                     Accounting Officer

                                       21
2820 

FILE INFO 

ACTION 

n 90399 

SfCRfT 

(When Filled In) 

"J, .f(\) ",,\; 

..... 8 ..... ·· ... !:-e,.......,~~~ ........... l' 191533Z NOV 69 CITE !}JHALE 1632 

P~IO;HTY· PILOT 

GAMBIT, CORONA, EARPOP, TAG, TACKLE, CHESS, RUFF, ZARF 

3YEMAN TALE~H KEYHOLE CHA~lNELS JOPJTLY 

AE.::. N: [ 

REF: YOUR MEMO 8-5427-69 

0\\\ 

1. K11JMPINOR 14336, 18 NOV 69, QUOTED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. 

ruOTE 1. CONSIDERING THAT THERE MAY 8E A SIGNIFICANT TIME 

PE~IOD BEFORE THE NEXT 0-21 PHOTOGRAPHIC MISSION REQUEST 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

THAT ASSIG~MENT OF THE CODEWORD TAG PROPOSED FOR USE ON D-21 DRONE 

FILM 3E RECONSIDERED. 2. PRESENTLY USED IN THE: INVENTO;:;Y OF 

COMIREX-RELATED CODE !tJORDS ARE TMJGO, TALENT, TACKLE, T,~G80.4RD, 

A~D TIGER. TIGER IS THE NON-8YEMAN REFERENCE TO TAGBOARD; 

TANGO, THE PHONETIC FOR LETTER T, IS USED FOR TALENT.3. SUGGEST 

mESS BE USED AS THE CODEWORD FOR PHOTOGRAPHY TAKEN BY ANY AIR 

ffiEATHING VEHICLE OVER DENIED AREAS. TCO'S PRESENTLY HAVE 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115159 

\ <.j-q) 
2820 

SECRET 

I FILE INFO (When Filled In) 

REPRODUCTION PROHIBiTED 

ACTION 1 6 11 

2 7 12 

3 8 13 

4 9 

5 1,0 

PAGE 2 WHALE 1632 5 E G ~ E T 

'CH~SS' STAMPS AND SECURITY CLASSIFICATION DIRECTIONS. 4 IF 

THE CODEtvORD CHESS IS UNACCEPTABLe: SUGGEST A FOUR LETTER WO;:(D 

9E CHOSEN THAT IS AS DIFFERENT FROM TAGBOARD AS ZARF IS FROM 

E.4RPOP AND RUFF IS FROM CORONA AND GAMBIT. 5. AN U~NECESSM(Y 

RISK IS BEING TAKEN WITH THE USE OF TAG. DUE TO ITS LONG 

P~RIOJ OF DEVELOP~ENT, MANY PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF "TAG80~RD" 

~TH OFFFICIALLY AND UNOFFICIALLY. TO UTILIZE A PRODUCT 

~LLED TAG WILL NOT REINFORCE THE SECURITY ATTITUDE THAT 

PROTECTS THE SECRECY OF INDIVIDUAL 3YEMAN CODEWORDS. E~) 

~UOTE. 

2. K~HALE CONCURS WITH RATIONAL AND PROPOSAL IN KWMANOR 

14386. 

SECRET 

3T 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115159 

\L+L+! 

---.------ 16 

17 

18 .-- 19 ._- 2,0
Attorney Br.'an M. Sc^Jt ZZ^Io-o

"SI £. Co

.4Hens, T 73 7-T/ 3-/9-/5"

~Plr< Sahmiji '

LJrit of /-/

GiT X am CUr-iing ~ho Vou. m reqcroA fo />n* HQ7

beaj ^bfgui • .X feeeived the Uh>it CrCq/ -Pr<g/^ V^f Co^rt of Cr'.^i^^l

J)pfi€c<U of 7~€Koj: Oai 3-/9-75" /J~i^c^ JoLJe</ £-33-/^ avo/pM+'n^rfreS- /Jo.r03i ^ofS".

/eff f/?e MenJeCSon C<o*»+h >W/. a.nJ re.hir^eJ to t~ne TDCJ-JD £ur*ej

g^'-f o^ 3- 03-IF u>here. JZ lj<ks noi cxllo^eJ fo Durebase Si^^fis or \o to "ft*.

Urn f JLo,^ i,'.Ararv £?* Z'06-/f X feln/Vife/ fo /-hvi 6(>rf <9-F ^X/An^P^y, ^'cAcve /

U^'fi 7%-f ti^.'t US<i-l Or, At^-c/o^ • ^9£.'>, JT t^aj >00f (x)\oi~>eJ toyiS'~h He 1<K\~> =3

i, j>fgr.i of 3M.rciicuf^ 3-fcy^>/3(. T?je <Am>t /~s rto i~) Q-T4- cDi J.oct-d>o<~>r, -So no^ -T

J&SXjX. M

CarteS.nafie/ UJ.tU \[oC PfQq Cr/>» o, £2_y_C£bX •d 3s ^_^.

/n ncJec to

Please n^k tie O.a-u.r'h o£ Cr.'^i/»«../ Apf>e*U tor a (L^i^/m^uLe.

fe^o/lr/ /o 7^<!. /we/i'wy ^T Fcj_<_t 4*J COnd"-S> O*S Q\ I <^<~J . ^

./Z^^l0i3£_£JCilJ_^^ Z2?_e C.Qi?-\//.:cf<0^ ^Q^ 0ht*i\ *J

j^/7. /3/W ,/ift Q.^'li^ UJt'cU uJ<xs riot Valuta?,' U /y>a_Je. uiLkk—/?c<t^re 2_£ ^e CAa^je.-

_a«.oZ_C.a>ixe9,i-e^cei-^-£-^je_^.Zea_«_XgL-^je F''i(Jr»y <gf Ec_sJb-JP /-S** C&) 7%g Cs>^rf places

Ja.e a.oU-LeJs.e J

* Plox.\

f 4h„-e;n vStrJe VaisuSiJZoi T^^ff-^i^ /V/A^f .7^gtfBrOFCRIMIWALAPPEALS

_Jr4-^,:U34i/.< %Jj-J^_iO-8J Tc^ OJ}J : : MAR 25 2015 _

£*-f*^,lJltou>Jle*-JllZJ_£±J_+^^

-E^e-c-f-o—^3jy_5j^a^-3-7JL^-C4-_Laj? * - /

i Ato@IAeosti76terk-

.^i

/

AJ.S.Q s/-7ce -^g /73r •^/•'•'^/ ^^^ ika^e .^.y^.ijJjLcJjJ>J3-—QMSr ^aja

4J.^—^^re-U iie-^j-T^e C-QrA-j-4-Q—cxdtjjiesj—^-O2.uu3.o4-^-^-

I of <R
11 LJoiAcJ /.'fee t~a he a.ble. f-o t-eJechone vi^oi^, a.+ no Cos+f+o

s^ ^J£A this ; <; ok j \<cdu must rg^,'.sfef wn^r pUaoe•*t by C<^lh'i_*

%LL- 9l£>/0- ~7 %QLl or o,n to vu\*/y-'' -fextkjpr.'s-c*phone. Co£-l_-

T/4>'-s' ^c^ fAf .^rt^rf T^g.-/- X Cot^/cJ Crt^ic^ct Ma -5fi Z"

A? rtfl p "7*^ i

_Uo^C-. .Cojo3i0-C££- I M ._

_ilo..b-e-e /^>l^klAfn ^PVMni-O^

A JJQJ-Ua-IsJ. U-i3-<-3-

JUU>M S^--JL£X5±L

^-^^^.^.S.e.e—C&J-cm.,yJ—i-X—Z-SI2_2_£_

<_2 O-f cX
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,561,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,723,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,646,306
<PP&E>                                      89,290,958
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,273,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,451,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,113,269
<BONDS>                                     47,265,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       243,357
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,828,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,451,134
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               796,229
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,231,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,771,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,206,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,206,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,206,673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111778 

HANDL:E vr~ . TALENT-KEYHOLE. 

'CONTROL SV<:;TFM ()NI.V 

1/23/69 TCS No. 36, 991/68 

ARGO Working Group on Marine Sciences 

This document consists of L ,:CS 

No. ~ot ~Copies, Scrlc.s 

The Working Group is requested to identify by April 15, 1969, the 

current and future opportunities for using the classified satellite 

program £or meeting specific civilian agency requirements in the 

marine sciences (e.g. , ice observation; coastal delineation, chart• 

ing, and mapping; harbor and port surveys; oceanography) and to 

. prepare recommendations concerning: 

a.· ·· -Specific agency requirements that can· most effe~tively 

be met by the classified satellite program. 

b. Agency and interagency arrangements for developing 

and submitting requests for specific satellite 

missions. 

c. Processing and distributing results of satellite obser:-

vations to end users. 

In accomplishing the foregoing, the Working Group should: 

a. · Evaluate and supplement the marine sciences sections 

of the ARGO report, taking into account the comments 

····- prepared by the Naval Oceanographic Office • 

. b. Identify tho.se requirem~nts that can most effectively 

be met by use of the classified satellite program, 

including consideration of possibilities of sanitization and declassification of selected data. 

c;. Describe agency plans for clearing personnel and 

developing facilities to process and distribute resu~ts 

of classified satellite observations to end users. 

fi'A'NDCE' W~ 

. TALENr-KEYHOL~ ~-.. ·-- -

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111778 
.. ' \ , .. .. _ . ' .. 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111778 

i/23/69 

ARGO WORKING GROUP ON MARINE SCIENCES 

Glenn E. Schweitzer, Chairman 

~ational Council on Marine Resources 

& Engineedng Development 

John M. DeNoyer 

U. S. Geological Survey 

_John C. Fry 

National Council on Marine Resources 

& Engineering Development 

James S. Jordan 

Department of Transportation 

J. Robert Porter, Jr. 

National Aeronautics & Space Administration . 

Lloyd L. Rall 

Defense Intelligence Agency 

Albert D. Super 

U. S. Coast Guard 

G. Carper Tewinkel 

Coast & Geodetic Survey 

Gustave Wolf 

U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office 

......,.,., 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111778
#### Bock, Respondent, vs. Lutes and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toe-baas*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Hill, Beckwith & Harrington*of Madison.

*By the .Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
November 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Fuel Break (Code 383) 

A fuel break is a strip or block of land on which the

vegetation, debris, and litter have been reduced and/or

modified to control or diminish the spread of fire. 

Practice Information 

Fuel breaks are planned and located at strategic locations

on the landscape to minimize wildfire risk and unwanted

damage to land and structures. Fuel breaks support the

application of prescribed fire to improve forest and plant

health, wildlife habitat, or livestock forage. A fuel break is typically an easily accessible strip of land of

varying width (depending on fuel and terrain). Fuel breaks split up large, continuous tracts of dense,

natural fuels, thus reducing the risk of wildfire. Removal of ladder fuels reduces the risk of crown fires. 

Fuel breaks need to be treated or grazed to avoid a buildup of excess litter, and to control noxious and

invasive plants. 

Fuel breaks must be inspected periodically and woody materials such as dead limbs or blown-down

trees removed or treated to maintain the diminished risk of fire spread. 

Common Associated Practices 

Fuel Break (383) is commonly associated with the conservation practices such as Prescribed Fire

(338) Firebreak (394), Access Road (560), Forest Trails and Landings (655), Tree/Shrub Pruning

(660), and Woody Residue Treatment (384). 

For areas with soil erosion potential after a fuel break is installed, the following practices may be used:

Critical Area Planting (342), Sediment Basin (350), Structure for Water Control (587), and Access

Control (472). 

Where grazing or wildlife objectives/concerns exist, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645) and

Prescribed Grazing (338) may be applicable. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2005143EN.01001302.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 14 April 2005

in Case C-299/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/77/EC - Markets for electronic communications networks and services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 143/17)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-299/04, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. Christoforou and K. Mojzesowicz) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 14 July 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April 2005, in which it:

| (1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2002/77/EC of 16 September 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| (2) | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228 of 11. 09. 2004.

1

---