alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS & STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         221,914                 250,255
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,914                 250,255
<PP&E>                                           3,239                   2,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (450)                   (300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,703                 252,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,745                  15,460
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         7,538                   5,980
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,420                 231,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,703                 252,694
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,924                  85,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (105,924)                (85,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (105,924)                (85,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (105,924)                (85,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005069EN.01000803.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division), by order of that court dated 11 January 2005, in the case of B.F. Cadman against Health & Safety Executive, Intervener: Equal Opportunities Commission

(Case C-17/05)

(2005/C 69/18)

Language of procedure: English

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division), dated 11 January 2005, which was received at the Court Registry on 19 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the case of B.F. Cadman and Health & Safety Executive, Intervener: Equal Opportunities Commission on the following questions:

| 1) | Where the use by an employer of the criterion of length of service as a determinant of pay has a disparate impact as between relevant male and female employees, does Article 141 EC require the employer to provide special justification for recourse to that criterion? If the answer depends on the circumstances, what are those circumstances? |
| --- | --- |

1)

Where the use by an employer of the criterion of length of service as a determinant of pay has a disparate impact as between relevant male and female employees, does Article 141 EC require the employer to provide special justification for recourse to that criterion? If the answer depends on the circumstances, what are those circumstances?

| 2) | Would the answer to the preceding question be different if the employer applies the criterion of length of service on an individual basis to employees so that an assessment is made as to the extent to which greater length of service justifies a greater level of pay? |
| --- | --- |

2)

Would the answer to the preceding question be different if the employer applies the criterion of length of service on an individual basis to employees so that an assessment is made as to the extent to which greater length of service justifies a greater level of pay?

| 3) | Is there any relevant distinction to be drawn between the use of the criterion of length of service in the case of part-time workers and the use of that criterion in the case of full-time workers? |
| --- | --- |

3)

Is there any relevant distinction to be drawn between the use of the criterion of length of service in the case of part-time workers and the use of that criterion in the case of full-time workers?

---
# C_2005137EN.01002101.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/21

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3808 — Mittal/Huta Stali Czestochowa)

(2005/C 137/14)

(Voor de EER relevante tekst)

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004

On 2 May 2005, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between Mittal Steel Company NV and Huta Stali Czestochowa Sp. z.o.o. On 27 May 2005, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
Argued and submitted August 29,

affirmed in part and reversed in part December 24, 1979

#### GRESSETT, Claimant, *Petitioner, v.*WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, *Respondent.*

(WCB No. 77-7892, Claim No. 2-77-523,CA 13613)

604 P2d 427

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O’Leary, and Peter O. Hansen, Portland.

Paul L. Roess, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Foss, Whitty & Roess, Coos Bay.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Gillette and Roberts, Judges.

BUTTLER, P. J.

*789BUTTLER, P. J.

Claimant in this worker’s compensation case is a 44-year-old body and fender man who has worked for the employer for more than ten years. He has had marked, severe, degenerative arthritis, particularly of the thoracic spine. His work with the employer required repeated bending and lifting and working on his back, and, after a period of years, his back pain gradually caused him to be disabled. Claimant last worked on March 3, 1977, and subsequently filed his claim for worker’s compensation benefits.

We need not detail the facts or evidence because we agree with the referee’s and Board’s conclusion that claimant’s work activity with the employer worsened his preexisting condition. The Board, however, reversed the referee’s order that the claim be accepted because the Board, relying on this court’s decision in *Weller v. Union Carbide,*35 Or App 355, 582 P2d 8 (1978), and *Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.,*35 Or App 457, 581 P2d 961 (1978), ruled that the claim was not compensable because there was no showing that the worsening was permanent. However, since the Board’s order was entered in this case, the Supreme Court, on review of both *Weller,*288 Or 27, 602 P2d 259 (1979) and *Stupfel,*288 Or 39, 602 P2d 264 (1979), disapproved of this court’s indication that the worsening of a preexisting condition must be permanent in order to be compensable. In *Weller,*the Supreme Court made it clear that a temporary worsening of the underlying disease is compensable if it requires medical services or results in temporary disability.

Accordingly, that portion of the Board’s order reversing the referee’s order that the claim be accepted is reversed. In all other respects, the Board’s order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
# Dr. Troy E. Meink

NRO Leadership
current page

## Dr. Troy E. Meink

### Principal Deputy Director, NRO

Dr. Troy E. Meink was appointed Principal Deputy Director, National Reconnaissance Office (PDDNRO) on 5 October, 2020. As the PDDNRO he provides overall day-to-day management of the NRO, with decision responsibility as delegated by the Director, NRO (DNRO). In the absence of the DNRO, he acts on the Director’s behalf on all matters.

Dr. Meink is from Lemmon, South Dakota and entered the Air Force in 1988 through the ROTC program at South Dakota State University. His assignments have included operations and training, systems engineering, research and development, and program management of major defense acquisition programs. Dr. Meink began his career as a KC-135 Tanker Navigator and Instructor and then a lead test engineer for the design and evaluation of ballistic missile test vehicles for the Missile Defense Agency.

As an Air Force Civilian, he managed multiple next generation joint research and development programs transitioning global space capabilities, optical sensors, and advanced structures. He subsequently led development for the Military Satellite Communications Joint Program Office and served as program director for the Transformational Satellite Communications System. He was Director, Communications Directorate, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense/Networks and Information Integration, and the Director, Signal Intelligence Systems Acquisition, National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Dr. Meink left the NRO for a time when he was assigned to the Department of the Air Force as the Undersecretary of the Air Force for Space and the Director, Executive Agent for Space Staff in Washington, D.C. Dr. Meink then served as the Assistant Director of National Intelligence for Systems and Resource Analyses.

His previous assignment was as Director, Geospatial Intelligence Systems Acquisition (GEOINT) at the NRO, starting in April 2017. In that capacity, Dr. Meink was responsible for the successful execution of all national geospatial intelligence satellite systems acquisitions within the NRO with a budget of more than $15 billion.
Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s
Internal Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's
Certificates Relative to the Servicing of Home Loan
Receivables

October 31, 2003

We, as members of management of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.,
(the Bank) are responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of home loan
receivables owned by Chevy Chase Home Loan Trusts Series
1996-1 and 1997-1 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein).
Internal control is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Bank's management and board of directors regarding the
preparation of reliable monthly Servicer's Certificates. Internal
control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates
relative to the servicing of home loan receivables owned by the
Trusts includes self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken
to correct deficiencies as they are identified. Because of inherent
limitations in any internal control, no matter how well-designed,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected,
including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of
controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Trusts can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to monthly
Servicer's Certificates preparation. Further, because of changes in
conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

The Bank assessed its internal control as of September 30, 2003
based on criteria for effective internal control over financial
reporting described in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework"
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, we assert that
the Bank maintained effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of home loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of
September 30, 2003 based on the specified criteria.


  /s/  Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.         /s/ Mark A. Holles
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.			Mark A. Holles
Executive Vice President and Chief 	Group Vice President
Financial Officer

 /s/  Joel A. Friedman                /s/  Thomas E. Uglietta
Joel A. Friedman			Thomas E. Uglietta
Senior Vice President and Controller 	Vice President
# C_2005044EN.01000401.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/4

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.3653 — Siemens/VA Tech)

(2005/C 44/04)

(Text with EEA relevanse)

On 14 February 2005, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.3653 — Siemens/VA Tech, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---
Approved for Release: 2022/02/1 0 C05134213 

~ATIONAL RECONi'-!AISSP,NC~ o;=:=1c::: 

\1/ASHl>lGTON, C,.C 

or.=1cE OF TH~ D',RECTOR \ -) 

Dear Dick, ( '/ 

June 23, 1971 

I have just finuhed reading a 9peecll._1?.:t::_t;!_~~nt_ed _[))' __ 

$er:-1:_?-fg,r: ___ H1Jmphr.e.y,_o ace Program wllic:.c was inserted 

in the June 18 Con ressional Record by Representative 

Teague. In the speech, Senator Humphrey openly e..cknoi:vledges and discussi:c:s the Satellite Reconnaissance :Jrogram. 

I believe that this speech could lead to some: very 

undesirable consequences. Other koowledgeable people 

who become familiar with this speech may feel that it: is 

acceptable to discuss the Satellite Reconnaissance Program 

in the public domain. I also feel that those who maintain 

a speculative interest in our activities may us~ this 

speech as a basis for undesirable publicity. Although he 

is __ inaccurate in his details, he discusses our ability to 

take extremely good pictures, a subject which we consider 

to be especially sensitive. 

I feel that continued exposure of r::his natu:ce may 

inhibit operations and could be provocative in view of 

Senator Humphrey 1s present and former positions and 

prestige. l believe it is appropriate co use your good 

offices to inform Senator Humphrey of the current national 

policy regarding Satellite Reconnaissance and to mi.nimize 

the impact of this breach. 

Sincerely, 

1 i>.t tc.chment 

Congressional Record Excerpt 

The Honorable Richard Helms 

Directc~ of Central Intelligence 

Washin.3con 1 D. C. 

~.• ,J .. ,'\ ~ ,·• • ~ 

i...J r i.\1•s't1: J

1 

·-·--~r"' ,~r"'·'~.:f'•.·· ! :a~ ..... L...,'--'~·-'""' ~ 

Approved for Release: 2022/02/1 0 Cos13421 :f'' ''°- _,,.,y 

n
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Philadelphia District Attorney’s :

Office :

:

v. :

: Craig Williams

, : No. 1337 C.D. 201 7

Appella nt :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 16 th d ay of April , 20 1 9 it is ORDERED that the

above

- cap tioned opinion filed February 8 , 2019 , shall be designated OPINION

rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

___________________________ ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
:iszth7,via BYEMAN • 

sk.!qarn 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2015 TOP, SECRET 

Intelligence Section. Deputy for 

Satellite Operations 

-46)-NRO Staff 

OIC: Major Frank S. 'Urban 

Assistants: SSgt Hank Buonanni 

SSgt Haien Marr 

Duty Subjects: 

To provide complete, accurate and timely intelligence support to all 

(=PC) National Reconnaissance Programs In which the operational control and 

support is vested in the Deputy for Satellite Operations ,46)-NRO Staff. 

Action items: 

a. Through daily liaison with the Washington intelligence community, maintains currency with changes in intelligence targets of interest. 

and changes in target priorities, in order to assure the best possible collection response by the satellite reconnaissance progratn. 

b. Represents the-(S}NRO on the COMOR and, when appropriate, 

on other committees and working groups of the WIS. 

e. Serves as the responsibleiONRO Staff element and central 

-46) NRO Staff contact point for all USIB matters--USIB, COMOR agendas. 

minutes, papers, etc., and for NSA and DIA matters, papers and documents 

pertaining to intelligence collection requirements and priorities. Keeps the 

419-NRO Staff informed of all US1B, COMOR and DIA actions of interest to the 

-46),NRO. 

d. Prepares brienng memorandum for the Director,46)-NRO 

prior to each t meeting. 

e. Monitors intelligence reports and documents as necessary in 

order to maintain current knowledge 14 all areas of intelligence collection 

interest. Prepares briefings and summaries as necessary to keep the(S) NRO 

Staff appropriately informed. 

, 

I A 

!Jr SECRET 
EXCLUDED FEOU YT77-‘_TIC 

REGRADING; DOD 7)200.10 

DOES DOT AEFLY 

1 1....•••••■■•••••••■•■•woa•T., 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2015 SECRET „.„e via WILIAM 

f. With the help of the various project officers , conchs/as analyses 

of degree of success of satellite missions in regard to target coverage achieved 

versus target coverage attempted and collates results. 

g. Participates in post-mission critiques to improve procedures 

and coordination. 

h. Conducts cumulative analyses of target coverage obtained and 

collates with USEB collection requirements. 

1. In conjunction with project officers , provides intelligence contributions to analyses of photo and SWINT intelligence requirements and priorities 

as compared to planned collection capability. With intelligence coordination 

these actions will serve as hada for recommendations for-tS)NRO program 

planning to meet the requirements. Project officers will have prime responsibility. 

j. Utilizing climatology studies provided by weather erection, provides Deputy for Satellite Operations with analyses of photographic collectionrequirements versus climatology with which he can use as a basis for recommending mission schedules to Director ,'NRO Staff. 

k. In conjunction with project officer. provides Deputy 

for Satellite Operations with analyses of SWINT collaction reqedrernesta which, 

when combined with extent of collection capabilftien, can serve as basis for 

recommendation of SKINT satellite mission schedules to Director,-(St NRO 

Staff. 

PSOPY -~CO~PIRS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from *
fiscal 1998 consolidated financial statements of Ameriking, Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-28-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-28-1998
<CASH>                                         10,591 
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,237
<PP&E>                                         83,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                238,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,798
<BONDS>                                       175,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          39,093
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (8,825)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  238,719
<SALES>                                       307,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              307,488
<CGS>                                          95,920        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 269,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,571
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (3.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (3.91)
        


</TABLE>