alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONTROL SYS

INATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF November 15, 1973

.14,31 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: Construction Project for the Modification of the 544th

SAC has now submitted its project for the modification

of the 544th in connection with the Nest° r hasedown. The

estimated cost of the project is

We have had recent TK-level discussions with Maj Gen

McGarvey, the Deputy Director of Civil Engineering about

the project. The two papers at the right reflect the gist

of the discussions.

We foresee some security difficulties and some procedural

difficulties in processing because of the late date for submission. We will prepare a memorandum for your signature to

Assistant Secretary /Undone in the near future and coordinate

it through Assistant Secretary Schrontz.

This memorandum is for your information.

MOM

HAROLD S. COYLE, JR.

Lt Colonel, USAF s•

2 Atch

Memo, subj: Visit to Can &Garvey, Nov 15, 73.

Memo, subj: 544th ARTW Project

Ct SEWIE:11111111111kOSISEPT 11.1.0

asAtAAL Icneouic co

axacvms OSSE• SSW SEISLIEEESEE CAM

WOE SSE oacLasso• OM MD OE T

CONTROL NO Inr.rnpl,

COPY OF COPIES

CONTROL systam PAGEA__OP_I_ PAGES
#### Lallement and another, Respondents, vs. Jensen and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Barber, Keefe, Patri & Horwits,*attorneys, and *Frank B. Keefe*and *W. Mead Stillman*of counsel, all of Oshkosh.

For the respondents: *G. E. Clifford*of Green Bay, *Lloyd D. Mitchell*of Oshkosh, and *Bendinger & Hayes,*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *John A. Kluwin*of counsel of Oshkosh.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114899 

TOP SECRET 

OXCART/TAGBOARD 

j..S1 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

,,',' .' 7 IiA~OI ( VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SY'ttM 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

pfUJ !) ?. rt...C I) 

BYEMAN 

eON1ROl SYS![M 

June 22, 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nitze 

Mr. Helms 

Dr. Hornig 

SUBJECT: Successful TAGBOARD Test Flight, 

June 16, 1968 

TAGBOARD Drone #512 was launched over the Pacific 

Missile Range from the B-52 mother aircraft at 1534 EDT 

on June 16, 1968. The launch was without incident. The 

drone profile was approximately 400 nautical miles down 

range and then into a circular course around the ship 

"Range Tracker" at a constant 3.25 Mach for a total distance of 2824 miles. The entire flight was as programmed 

with the drone attaining an altitude of 91,000 feet even 

though it was in an almost continuous turn. Preliminary 

instrumentation indicated sufficient fuel remained for an 

additional 300 miles. 

Hatch recovery was effected at 1723 EDT. 

drone flight time was 90 minutes 46 seconds. 

The total 

This is the first fully successful near-nominal range 

flight of the TAGBOARD since reorientation of the program 

from launch by an OXCART-type aircraft ~o B-52 launch with 

rocket boost to cruising altitude and speed. I believe 

that this flight marks an important milestone in the program and that we can now proceed with considerable confidence with additional flights toward achieving an 

operational capability by the end of the year. 

Although many actions have been taken to improve the 

system reliability as a result of deficiencies shown in 

the past several flight tests, the key difficulty encountered was in the failure of the ramjet engine to achieve 

stable cruise operation at the end of rocket boost. The 

OXCART/TAGBOARD 

CONYRO,NoBYE-13l71-68 

TOP SECRET ()( ClUfJtO fROM AU10MA TIC R f GRADING 

000 P1AfCTI¥£ SlOO 10 00£5 NOT APPl"i 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114899 

C-Opy ___ o, ____ COPlts 

PAC[ 1 o'---,2=--- P'Gf~ 

I 

<oj 
BYEMAN 

CONTROl. 'H5H M 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114899 

TOP SEGRET 

OXCART/TAGBOARD 

fixes to the inlet spike and modifications to control 

and initial operating limits which have been made and 

incorporated in the vehicle used in this flight have 

I aQQarently solved these Droblems I I 

Copy 1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Working 

SS-l 

RF 

RD-2 

RD-2 

Mr. Helms 

Dr. Hornig 

Dr. Foster 

SS-7 

Copies 

Alexander H. Flax 

OXCART/TAGBOARD 

BYEMAN 

CO"'.Ol NO BYE-13171-68 

TOP SECRET [lCUJO{O '-ROM AU10MAHC R[GPADU~G 

DOD OilHCHV£' 520010 DOES NOT APPLY 

COPY ___ O'_::::--_ COPIE. So 

p "(0 E_2~_ o,-=2=---_ PAGE'S 

....... _______________ -'--A.Ip-'=-p-'-'ro:....:v-"-e~d__'_fo"_=r_Release: 2018/11/16 C05114899
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject - FY 2010

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.40



                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                   THE SUBSCRIPTION AND PUT AND CALL AGREEMENT
                    WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
                   WESTERN WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


        This Third Amendment to the Subscription and Put and Call Agreement with
respect to Shares of Common Stock of Western Wireless International Corporation,
as amended (the "Horwitz Agreement"), is made as of this 28th day of February,
2001, by and between Bradley J. Horwitz ("Horwitz"), Western Wireless
International Corporation ("WWIC"), Western Wireless Corporation ("WWC"), and
WWC Holding Co., Inc. ("Holding Co.") (WWC and Holding Co. are collectively
referred to as "Western," and together with Horwitz and WWIC, collectively, the
"Parties").

                                   WITNESSETH:

        WHEREAS, Horwitz and Western have each determined that it is in their
best interests to extend to March 31, 2001 the period during which Horwitz shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to require Holding Co. to exchange all
of his shares of WWIC for that number of shares of WWC equal to the Call
Consideration (as defined in the Horwitz Agreement);

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree that Paragraph 8
of the Horwitz Agreement is amended to read as follows:

                During the period from January 1, 2001  through  March
                31, 2001,  Horwitz  shall have the right,  but not the
                obligation,  to require  Holding Co. to exchange  all,
                but not less than all,  of the Shares for that  number
                of  shares  of WWC  Common  Stock  equal  to the  Call
                Consideration.

        Except as amended herein, the terms of the Horwitz Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been duly executed on the day and
year first written above.


WESTERN WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION      WESTERN WIRELESS CORPORATION

By: /s/ John W. Stanton                         By: /s/ John W. Stanton
    -------------------------------                 ---------------------------
        John W. Stanton                                 John W. Stanton
        Chairman and                                    Chairman and
        Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Executive Officer

BRADLEY J. HORWITZ                              WWC HOLDING CO., INC.

/s/ Bradley J. Horwitz                          By:  /s/ John W. Stanton
-----------------------------------                ----------------------------
                                                         John W. Stanton
                                                         Chairman and Chief
                                                         Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 19, 2005

                                   /s/ Jean-Paul Ouellette
                                   -----------------------
                                   Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Richard  W.  Lucas,  as  Chief  Financial  Officer  of KSW,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that:

     (1) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 7, 2006


                                                         /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Richard W. Lucas
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005045EN.01000502.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-36/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)): The Queen, on the application of: Approved Prescription Services Ltd, v Licensing Authority
   (1)

The Queen

Approved Prescription Services Ltd

Licensing Authority

1

(Medicinal products - Marketing authorisation - Procedures for essentially similar products)

(2005/C 45/09)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-36/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), made by order of 23 December 2002, received at the Court on 3 February 2003, in the proceedings between The Queen, on the application of: Approved Prescription Services Ltd, and Licensing Authority, acting by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, interested party: Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd, – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it has ruled:

The Queen

Approved Prescription Services Ltd,

Licensing Authority

Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd

An application for marketing authorisation for a Product C may be made under Article 10(1)(a)(iii) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use where the application seeks to demonstrate that Product C is essentially similar to a Product B, in circumstances where:

| — | Product B is a new pharmaceutical form of Product A, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Product B is a new pharmaceutical form of Product A, and

| — | Product A, but not Product B, has been authorised for marketing in the Community for at least the six or ten year period stipulated therein. |
| --- | --- |

—

Product A, but not Product B, has been authorised for marketing in the Community for at least the six or ten year period stipulated therein.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003.

1

---
MEMO ROUTING SLIP 1 --giuszne4Pretivaivaimu .1 711;:ri f, 0)(21 WILLS ClICULATI

ONIANIZATION MO LOCATION

A i ....4i

_' 

Ili lb, VIMIIIIiin

. i ' AWffraiS

ITIOMINNE11

': "AF R ME iLT

iv

74/4---

,,,. 6fii . .

•

"ENE

ramre or.o...r)4. ,

.i-e 7-zz___

"2•_ev yi..0.161.-7zt;•4-te

ate= ci;I nFc

..y_d_

ed._ . a....0.....14.....-

./. ,e

.

I _

?NON 

1446 as V J. III " ' tr'

ma or , Ale .

awl 4,s /

ONSANCOITION ARO i . • et We *, SwF 77

24 ,„„14thato er Ldp "all/a•I.

......1. . ..... _ _ _

1 fu 1. a.^

mai Auld AVM
•

Os,

;iv r;t4.

" • .4%

•

•

•

4t: .1 fool that the benefits ti.to iging..07 the Air Force through funding of the Point Arguello 4awicdi Cowles : and the *Missile Usery Suilding at Vandenberg viii cutvolgh th*: Wt or.th• programa. Thorp- • - • fon, I'raccomond that th decision to he AVPA . pay for the*. be reeerood and cenahruation fu.ido be .prividad by the Air POPO*. ,T •

•

I. W. SWIMS. JR. *Om General, MAP

Comaandur

•

g.

•

•

•

VL DOC

HO nAvA ,.‘

0ts '. tilitlt? a ( 1j

slco,.. . Irt LI

tatty ' t oli*:i'l

_.. t V C4S ...* EE ._,EIA 7 0

.

:=4

IP' "

.'"Pagi4iiitt.. C9-V4935

.•

".

•

1-it=z.vt

-.

. outside our isatrol.41.-thireorei :reseseend that the decision to

have 1 pay fer the IlOint Arguello Leessier sad the •andeobers

Missile Asseibly MAW be reversed sail that the Air Pares, instead •

of the AM, provide the esestraction fled, SrO these facilities.

leis proposed treesfer of Ands betimes the Air Force and the ARPA viU .

not attest the overall DZI00,11.110111111T Proven feeding of .215

willies' in Pineal Tear 1959. ,

•

D. A. SONIMIII

Yale, lieseralipledP

Corder

•

1 10
A FDDC-ND

AFDDC-NS

A FDDC -PA

AFDDC -ES

AFDFI5

Appropriate Action

Direct Reply

Coordination to,:js,IN A /...) 

Note and Return

Information

Action Ras Gone To:

Return to DCS/D for File

File or Destroy

NIIIMINNMINMEn•n•1111!.

Coordinate With:

Prepare Reply for Signature

Of:

AFDRQ

AFDAP

A FDAT

AFDDP

AFDDS

AFMDC -SE

Copies Furnished:

Repare Staff Summary. Sheet for

Signature Of:

Approval Of:

DEPUTY Cr 'F OF STAFF, .DEVELOPMEN"

ROUTING SLIP

DATE L4 arptv.r,

TO: FOR:

'OMMENTS:

DDC(Has) 3 (Has Not)

Petie" "f447

WILLIAM H. STREET

Major, USAF

Assistant Executive

DCS/Development
Apt". Ile *AM' Aram Au; ve •

,..01:1C,.0, INE :me ail, or •ETA-Fir

•

_ _ I autat4 sup • ! .

SRTR

 .•

i

rrrl =2

rmrs is

Mr1111 74 .1771

NI 1771

=11

Om n YfrAl • =IIa

El = • rnrammnia=larrinurrni

am riz.:7r rr-zium=imicram=1

s=

=1

AMC MI

r71111111=111111=11

EIFIPCP Mg= M731/111

=II

MOS II =

=II • =1

=IIITrr11111 mem l•=A• Ann • I =1 =II

n rm"r! as • ' =7. 1111 =MI • ®1=11I

n r."773 i MAP • n =I • III • n ARM III MN

l=;. MOD . v HMV • •

Pm , .

.

I

rRRrARATItiN OF i ELY pou SI USAIUNI OF IA? • -

AM _ me

aw Om yF mm. ma kw ma atom

. J.,. •

-

II

tai N gni* Ger NAVE ma •4:. 1.,i1r, ', Agra , regivrqu_m

Game HAS sot le .

. imam •DATE

; .

•

' I k 1 7 i

1

•

.

,. •

"ker lkiji . • Ns Tat mg ate Of surr

mir.TARSoNS

wore UStif . ,

.

AFN •-riillemittof • sag somin MR lasers
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40882

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE LOPEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:18-CR-495-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe 

Lopez-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Garcia has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40882 Document: 00514946611 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
No. 18-40882

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40882 Document: 00514946611 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
FROM AUT3MATI tADIg3;

In. 5200.10 DOES O1f APPLY

••••issa•••••••••

CentrO oPet

15 AUG 1962

mniontanng BOB DIRECT, NM

SUBJECT: Pbolographis laterpretsttan Basolotton Requiranods

Tbeitillatiord lieesensiminoe Cake b IS soppd•

la the eamparbos d a onxbee d 'swine* plidegropido WWI= m.. It is left bat • /major Wash kr esosideratisa In the avatar Bon and selecties st maim matellbe essoondemoo are the photogroplds fir odbete be wail reqpired to Abdo

vaxises levels et bloanaatba prierity beget Opal deelliested W COMM

BMW/ =datum is raimeted is ba preparation of sseb

a photo interprotation statommt dgodly tor.arob. As it Is

espestod that doable= aid resonaloodotless be 'steal* oistions

will be made &Ow be eemdeg voski, It is terber roteested tbot

prieelky be assigood to be preparation d taste in eider. that decision; son be reached, 1111114111 won pidonse boo the pbotagrepbio

uploitation eeammadiy in eadonotles witik one esabatios d teobisal

capabilition.

Mead

lee* V. Cloak

Director

41-1lationet limandemee ellbe
# C_2005093EN.01002202.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/22

---

Action brought on 3 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-107/05)

(2005/C 93/42)

Language of the case: Finnish

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 3 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by U. Wölker and P. Aalto, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to incorporate Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 (1) establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC into its national legislation as regards the province of Åland (Ahvenanmaa), or at least by failing to communicate that to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to incorporate Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 (1) establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC into its national legislation as regards the province of Åland (Ahvenanmaa), or at least by failing to communicate that to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive;

1

| 2. | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on 31 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 275 of 25.10.2003, p. 32.

1

---
On reconsideration by the court on its own motion, former opinion filed August 27 (41 Or App 637, 598 P2d 1244),

former opinion modified December 24,

respondent’s reconsideration denied December 13, 1979

petition for review allowed January 15, 1980

#### BLANTON, *Respondent, v.*UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, *Appellant.*

(No. [ AXXXX-XXXXX ], CA 11120)

604 P2d 883

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Buttler, Judges.

THORNTON, J.

*743THORNTON, J.

In our decision in this case we made an erroneous statement of the applicable law in discussing defendant railroad’s third assignment of error, namely that the trial court erred by instructing the jury not to consider plaintiff’s pension benefits.

While this error does not change the result, we nevertheless deem it advisable to correct it.

Accordingly, the opinion is modified by striking the final paragraph of the opinion and substituting the following new paragraph:

> "We do not find the court’s instruction in this regard to be error. In *Eichel v. New York Central R. Co.,*375 US 253, 84 S Ct 316, 11 L Ed 2d 307 (1963), the court expressly held that in an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act it is improper to consider disability payments made to the plaintiff under the Federal Railroad Retirement Act on the question of plaintiff’s motive for not returning to work.”

> "Reversed and remanded for a new trial.”

Former opinion modified.
Exhibit 8

                                  Subsidiaries

     A.   ASE Test Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic
          of China;

     B.   ASE Test Holdings Ltd, a corporation organized under the laws of the
          Cayman Islands, and its majority owned subsidiary, ISE Labs, Inc., a
          corporation organized under the laws of the state of California,
          U.S.A. ISE Labs, Inc. has four subsidiaries:

          (i)   ISE Labs Hong Kong Limited, a corporation organized under the
                laws of Hong Kong.

          (ii)  ISE Labs Singapore Pte Limited, a corporation organized under
                the laws of Singapore.

          (iii) ISE Technology, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
                California.

          (iv)  Digital Testing Services Inc., a corporation organized under the
                laws of California.

     C.   ASE Test Finance Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
          Mauritius; and

     D.   ASE Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd., a corporation organized under the
          laws of Singapore, and its wholly owned subsidiary, ASE Electronics
          (M) Sdn Bhd, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
          Malaysia.
#### Schreiner, Respondent, vs. Brewer and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Bundy, Beach & Holland*of Eau Claire.

For the respondent: *Roy P. Wilcox*of Eau Claire and *Ira 0. Slocumb*of Menomonie.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 10/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Oct 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL