alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004262EN.01002303.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/23

---

Action brought on 2 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

(Case C-378/04)

(2004/C 262/42)

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 2 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Denis Martin and Horstpeter Kreppel, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 1999/38/EC of 29 April 1999 amending for the second time Directive 90/394/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work and extending it to mutagens (OJ 1999 L 138, p. 66) by not adopting the necessary legislative and administrative measures for the full implementation on that directive, or by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 1999/38/EC of 29 April 1999 amending for the second time Directive 90/394/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work and extending it to mutagens (OJ 1999 L 138, p. 66) by not adopting the necessary legislative and administrative measures for the full implementation on that directive, or by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission.

| 2. | Order the Republic of Austria to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Republic of Austria to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for implementing Directive 1999/38/EC expired on 29 April 2003.

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

 

1. Roof structure over waste storage facility, 

contaminated areas, composting facilities, etc. 

I.5 (-) Pathogens to ground 

and surface water

Roof Runoff Structure (558) 

I.3 (-) Nutrients and organics 

to ground and surface water

I.6 (+) Dissolved oxygen 

surface waters

C.3 (+) Aquatic 

health for humans 

and domestic and 

wild animals

I.4 (-) Noxious 

algal growth

I.11 (+) Meeting 

water quality

standards

I.2 (+) 

Agribusiness

C.1 (+) Stream fauna, 

e.g., fish, invertebrates

Initial setting: AFO is

established and operator wants 

to add a way to prevent roof 

runoff mixing with manure

D.2 (+) Collected water 

from roofs

I.10 (+) Economic 

benefit to farmer

C.2 (+) Income stability 

(individuals and community)

D.3 (+) Convey runoff from 

roofs

I.9 (+) Clean water 

availability

D.1 (-) Repair and 

maintenance of 

protected structures

I.1 (+) Economic 

benefit to farmer

I.7 (+) 

Infiltration

I.8 (-) Erosion

Start

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice
1-2 addressee

:911,111IP

5

--T-13fLSttitc-t-.

.

1:164 .

MilMORAIWOM MR Deputy Director (Science & Technology) CIA

SUBJECT: Soviet Anti-Satellite Capvbility

Reference is made to your 10 November memorandum on the

above sabject.

We seem to be losing sight of my original ropiest to the Agency

for essistance. is a 14 August latter to your Director, I refloated

estLmates of the and mega. Soviet sett-satellite tecindcal/

operational. aitT-11165 sad by mid-1968.

term Soviet detection A and I imbed him for

On 2 September, IIIMINC: me on possible nearfurther mss.During this briefing. he estimated

to be several times better than

use to determine cube parameters. McCaw apparently referred to you.

in a 22 September letter to General Carter, I pointed out ay

systems. I have sot yet received any information as to poundble and

probable weapons which might be used to opts or destroy our

satellites.

I still desire estimates of the possible and probable Soviet anti- • •

satellite capabilities in mid-1965 and by mid-1968. A report on the

overall subject is requested at your earliest cauvmdence.

• need was for anti-satellite wespcory as well as detraction and tracking *. , . 7 ••••••

Brockway

Director

8)-National Recommission,

-0 •

••

3 1

• .:

' _zr--r...---ZA:ote •

to.nitrtaDe 523 . f .y . - •

•••••••••••.. 1. •• •e11111•0•:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00513-CR

Maria Dolores Garcia

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

437th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018CR3313

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 15, 2021
Exhibit 31.4



I, Danny Zheng, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of GlassBridge Enterprises, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 1, 2017



| | /s/ Danny Zheng                                                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Danny Zheng                                                                              
| | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32(b)**




MICROS
      SYSTEMS, INC.





Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
      1350





In
      connection with the quarterly report of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q”) for the three months ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary C.
      Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
                  February 6, 2008
              /s/
              Gary
                  C. KaufmanGary
                  C. Kaufman
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM May 2016

Silvopasture Establishment 

(Code 381) 

3. Canopy cover, ground cover,

vertical vegetative structure from 

established plants

1. Wood fiber in 

established plants

2. Plant root systems, litter,

and soil organic matter

D.3 (+) 

Infiltration of

precipitation 

and soil storage

D.4 (-) 

Water/wind

erosion, 

sedimentation

D.2 (+) 

Carbon 

storage

C.2 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters

C.8 (+) Income and income 

stability (individuals and 

community)

C.1 (-) 

Atmospheric 

CO2 and 

greenhouse 

effect

C.9 (+) Forest/wood

product business and 

support infrastructure

D.7 (+) 

Shade

D.6 (+) Arboreal 

and early 

successional 

habitat

D.5 (+) 

Aesthetics

C.3 (+) Health for humans, domestic 

and wild animals

D.1 (+) Initial wood 

fiber growth rate

I.1 (-) Later wood 

fiber growth rate

Forest Stand 

Improvement (666) and 

Tree/Shrub 

Establishment (612) - 

periodic tree removal 

and replacement to 

maintain growth 

I.5. Harvested wood 

fiber and other tree/ 

related products 

Initial setting: Cropland, forage, or forested fields suitable for the 

establishment of the desired woody and forage plant species

where water and wind erosion, plant stress, lack of wildlife 

habitat, and/or inadequate forest or forage production to meet 

the client’s objective have been identified as resource concerns. 

I.4 (-) 

Airborne 

particulate 

matter

C.5 (+) Air 

quality

Notes: 

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect of the resource, 

not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

C.4 (+/-) 

Environmental quality

Pathway

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Associated practice 

I.8 (+/-) Return on 

investment

Start

C.6 (+) Recreation business and 

support infrastructure

I.2 (+/-) 

Soil quality

I.3 (+/-) 

Wildlife habitat 

(species 

specific)

I.6 (-) Livestock 

stress; (+) 

Livestock 

health, quality 

and production

C.7 (+) Agricultural 

business and support 

infrastructure

I.7 (+) Areal 

distribution of 

grazing, manures

D.8 (+/-) 

Forage 

production

Tree/Shrub Site 

Preparation (490)

Tree/Shrub 

Establishment (612)

Forage and Biomass 

Planting (512)

Range Planting (550)

4. Livestock onsite

C.10 (+) 

Atmospheric 

CO2 and 

greenhouse 

effect

D.11 (+) Active 

onsite 

management

D.10 (+) Methane

D.9 (+) Manure

Mitigating practice

I.9 (+) Soil functions; 

nutrient cycling,

mitigation of 

pollutants, pathogens

U U
# EXHIBIT  99.2

# Certification
Of Chief Financial Officer Of Devon OEI Operating, Inc.Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant ToSection  906 Of The SarbanesOxley Act Of 2002

I,
William L. Transier, Chief Financial Officer of Devon OEI Operating, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2003
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2003
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that
section.

I
further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William L.
Transier Name: William L. TransierTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 13, 2003
I' n10

Ammo nun Orison

AIR FORM BALLISTIC MISSILE DIVISION

NEADQUARTNIN

All ItINNARCM AND DIVILOPMENT COMMAND

MUTED STAMM AIR POWS

P.m MOO Box 29, Palo Alto, CaMforsie

WDZWL

SUBJECT: Establishment of System Test Working Group

TO: See Distribution

20 October 1958

Announcement is made of the establishment of a System Test

Working Group at Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, Missile System

Division, Palo Alto, California, for the purpose of evaluating and

approving procedures, policies and techniques to be used in WS 117L

systems tests. The System Test Working Group sill be responsible

for insuring that detailed test planning is accomplished and that

approved documents are issued covering all phases of the WS 117L

system test program. The System Test Working Group sill evaluate

results of each test and sill make necessary changes in procedures

and techniques to correct all known deficiencies. The System Test

Working Group sill be composed of the following permanent members:

Lt Colonel Charles O. Mathison, AMID Field Office,

CHAIRMAN

Major William C. Dues, AMID Field Office, Member

Mr. Ralph D. King, IKSD, Member

Mr. Stanley K. Hutchins LED, Member

Mr. Larry A. Smith, =Ds Member

Mr. L. Frank Morgan, IMELD, Member

The System Test Working Group sill convene at the call

of the Chairman.

G. MATHISON

Lt Colonel, USAF

Chief, ATM Field Office

DISTRIBUTION:

2 - ea member

5 - WDZiI

5 - WDEWL
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.5.1


                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE UTI ENERGY CORP.
               AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
               ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON APRIL 26, 1999


                  RESOLVED, than an amendment (the "1997 Amendment") to the
         Company's Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "1997
         Plan"), to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under
         the 1997 Plan by 900,000 is hereby authorized, ratified and approved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>          0001004540
<NAME>         AIRPLANES US TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9
<PP&E>                                             418
<DEPRECIATION>                                     121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11
<BONDS>                                            347
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (152)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (1)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (5)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (5)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 20.1

March 24, 1998

                           ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY

                      MELLON BANK (DE) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

               MELLON BANK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST Series 1995-A

                              ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING

                                DECEMBER 31, 1997



ANNUAL HOLDERS' DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY

Pursuant to Section 5.2, Servicer does hereby declare to the Trustee the
following distributions for the calendar year 1997 as set forth below:

<TABLE>
<S>       <C>     <C>                                                                   <C>
Interest Payments

A.       Pursuant to subsection 4.11(g);

         1.       Amount distributed to the Class A Holders                             $48,171,830.65

         2.       Amount distributed to the Class B Holders                             $  3,291,103.11

         3.       Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder                  $  4,876,036.52



Principal Payments

B.       Pursuant to subsection 4.11(h)(i);

         1.       Amount Distributed to the Class A Holders                             $        -0-

         2.       Amount distributed to the Class B Holders                             $        -0-

         3.       Amount distributed to the Collateral Interest Holder                  $        -0-


</TABLE>



                                          MELLON BANK (DE) NATIONAL
                                           ASSOCIATION, as Servicer



                                          By  /s/ John L. Klinck, Jr.
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Name:  John L. Klinck, Jr.
                                             Title: Senior Vice President
LEAR JET MODEL 23

LANDING APPROAC H SPEEDS

: .

140

. ~

<J] : !

f-< 130

a

~

Q

W

Wc,

P! 120

:;:

C1

Wf-<

«

u

Cl

110 ~

100

90 •••••••••• __ •••••••••••••• _ ••••••••••••

8000 9000 10000 11000

WEIGHT - LBS

12000

FIGURE 4-31

FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY

FAA APPROVED7/31/64 REVISED 8/27/65

PERFORMANCE

EXHIBIT

I ::ClEM 3 Y

13000

4-46

tPJ~ 23
GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE

Gil FUGHT MANUAL

Sedion 4

PERFORMANCE

.APPROACH SPEED FOR LANDING DISTANCE

o

The effect of weight aD appmach speed for Jandingwith 39 flaps and landing gear e%teDded is shown.

This chart is effeeti've fOt' an altitude!'. and 1empeta'tates.

APPROACH SPEED FOR LANDING . DISTANCE .

III)

b

~

I

III)

0(

o

.

•

1

M

I

a

J

21

f . I

2D Z2

--119

I

18

I

14

I

1Ii
,.' ....

.'."

':' ..

... . ' .

:".:

.,

"

. ,.

.,.

I

1

!

-

lb.

'.[,~

g}~,

".'

95 knots

Approach Speed Would be 95

Knots x 1.3= 123.5 knots 01

124 knots
MODEL: 8-268. 8-26C. T8-268

DATE: n AUGUST 19ti6

COIlFIGURATlOII: WITIIDUT DIlDElI WING DROP TANKS. \lING RAC«S.

DATA BASIS: f;'TlaAl\Yr:t'\

ENGINES: C2) V::<UUm~29, -71 on: ..~:")

FUEL (';!rN1E: 100/130

FUll ['H-lSITY: 6 ~n/(,.A'.

--

NORMAL ArP!10ACn-lI AIRSPEEDS

AIRCRAFT RECOMMENDED APPROACH RECOMMENDED THRESHOLD

GROSS SPEW MPH EAS 130'}', OF SPEED MPli

WEIGHT STALL SPEED EAS 120'}', OF STALL SI'G'I:l

POUNDS RAPS UP FlAPS ZO' FLAPS 5Z' FlAPS UP rtAPS ZO' FLAPS 52'

--

36,000 !A6 'I,? j~~ . ,..~ r:\

-----

34,000 IAI ',',5 \ ..•·7 f,','

32,000 175 if,() (·n -r.

30,000 170 155 D3 ;Sf

--

2t,ooo 1M I!">O lH .~-; I ~u

26,000 159 ~·H '1'1 ·;;\tl :J

Note: 1 mph = 0,868976242 knots
required to change these traditional review dates, and stated the NAP

was structuring the program to support a November 76 CFI meeting. If there

was a desire on the part of the CFI to change timing of these meetings,

ve needed to plan accordingly.

Arld646A0Mte

- The CFI principals reaffirmed a no-change-policyond this was

alt

and ehavvely confirmed with respect tooSovember by numerous

references to "decision to be review in November" in the 19 July

minutes.

VIKING PAPER FOR DR. COOK

SUBJECT: Budget Data Requirements for the Fall 1976 NFIP . Budget Review,

Admiral Murphy Memo, dated 17 August 76

PROBLEMS: Timing and Level - of - Detail

TIMING - In the May and July NRP/CFI reviews, the NRO discussed our

planning schedules for continuing to support the traditional "July/Nov"

NAP decision process. In July, we specifically pointed out the lead time

The NRO following the July CFI meeting tasked the program offices

to structure their vesubmission of program costs and relevant

studies to support a November CFI review. At this late date,

there is no way to accelerate the on-going effort to support an

early October review.

LEVEL-OF-DETAIL: The subject memo also requested that the NIP data

normally provided in the NRO Director's Report (In July 2 volumes, 241 pages)

be supplemented with additional data to a lower level-of-detail "similar

to that provided OMB last year".

- Last year, for the first time, and in an attempt to improve the

relationship between OMB and the NRO, Mr. Plummer agreed to
and provided an early November an expansion (shire the data was

readily available of the July 1975 ExCom data, for OMB's information

and use. The additional data provided were outdated and not very

meaningful. However, since at that time it was only provided to OMB

and had no impact on the decision process, ta nmadomn there was no

major concern other than the wasted time in preparing the document.

It was in our opinion a square filling exercise.

- While the NRO had no basic problem with providing the additional

outdated information to 0MB, we are somewhat more concerned now that

similar data is being requested by the IC Staff for their joint program

review.

NRO RECOMMENDATION AND POSITION:

RECOMMENDATION: Consistent .with the established streamlined management

procedures, the NRO should be excluded from the "staff level joint budget

hearings" as has been the case since 1962.

It is inconceivable to us, that 0MB should require a lower level

of detail for their joint hearings than is provided to the CFI

staffs to support the major programmatic decisions.

If directed, the NRO will support the staff level budget hearings by

providing an expansion of the July CFI Director's Report. This will

have to be accommodated while we are attempting to prepare for the

November CFI and the hard decisions deferred to that time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 19, 2015.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *Big Ridge, Inc.*                         v.                         *Secretary of Labor,*                         Docket Nos. LAKE 2011-699-R, et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding certain orders issued pursuant to sections 103(j) and 103(k) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-02869 Filed 2-6-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P