alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<-C-'EMJ\I\I r'rtNTRnl f'1 .. LIlNNJ:'1 ~ nNI v _lit 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101928 

li I aSSITICilli Uf! 

lOjD-O ~S~I~ . ...,-rCfilR ---T 

Page of __ 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1400097732D 

Ori ginator: Mr. I~ BHX I--_-.._.......-__ ..--D....".IS_T_R_I B_U_T-r' O_N 

ss.a ~----+--+----~~4------+--

S5·1 SS-4 FILE 

99'e E)llE© 99'9 99:9 

Date: __ ~2.::..3......:.A:.:..u:::.5g0i!.-...:6:....:7 __ S5·2 ADM IN 5S-6 

S5.3 5S-7 SAFRD-2 RF 

Precedence Addressee(s) 

PRIORITY Action: CHARGE 

Info: 

WHIG _____ _ 

Coord i na ti on 

FOR GENERAL MARTIN FROM DR. FLAX 

IN SEPTEMBER OF, 1966, DR. FOSTER ASKED THE NAVY TO IDENTIFY ITS ,-----------------

~ ________ ~------~I-CO-L-L-,E-C-T-I-O~N REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE POSSIBLE USE OF~i ______________ ~I eN MARCH 1, 1967, THESE WERE 

RECEIVED VIA A MEMORANDUM FROM THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE 

NAVY FOR R&D. 

THE NEXT STEP IS THE CONDUCT OF A STUDY OF A SATELLITE SYSTEM 

TO MEET THE NAVY REQUIREMENTS. I HAVE AGREED THAT THIS WILL 

BE DONE BY THE NRO AND REQUEST THAT YOU BE ffiEPARED TO UNDERTAKE 

THI S TASK AT NOT TO EXCEED ~"------__ -----l 

I HAVE PROPOSED THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENTS TO THE NAVY: 

A 

1. THE NRO TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF/SATELLITE SYSTEM WHICH 

WILL MEET THE NAVY REQUIREMENTS. THIS STUDY TO RUN IN PARALLEL 

WITH NAVY STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED Byi iSPACE 

SYSTEMS ORGANIZATION OF DATA HANDLING,TERMINAL REQUIREMENTS, 

INTEGRATION OF SATELLITE DATA WITH DATA FROM OTHER SOURCES, ETC. 

SAFSP WOULD PROVIDE ESTIMATES OF THE OUTPUT DATA OF CANDIDATE 

BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY Releasing Officer 

J 01j,as~~~~D<tT ~ 

' . v tl - ~ 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101928 

,,' 

, 
Continuation Sheet Page of 

SYSTEMS FOR THE NAVY STUDIES WHILE I I WOULD 

PROVIDE MORE EXPLICIT AND REFINED REQUIREMENTS AGAINST WHICH 

THENRO STUDY WOULD BE DIRECTED. 

2. THE NAVY TO PRESENT TO USIB ITS REQUIREMENTS FOR AN 

ACTIVE SATELLlT E SYST~ i 

--

3. ASSUMING THE STUDIES OF 1 ABOVE ARE FAVORABLE AND THE 

USIB ENDORSES THE REQUIREMENT FOR THIS DATA, THE NRO TO TAKE 

THE NECESSARY STEPS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. 

4. THE NAVY TO ASSIGN AN APPROPRIATELY CLEARED OFFICER 

TO THE SAFSP PROJECT OFFICE, TO ASSURE INTERFACE WITH PARALLEL 

NA VY . STUDI ES. 

5. THE NAVY TO INDICATE ,ITS CONCURRENCE WITH THIS APPROACH' 

AND TO ADVI SE THE NRO STAFF OF ITS ACTION. 

FOLLOWING THE RECEIPT OF NAVY CONCURRENCE, YOU WILL BE ADVISED 

TO PROCEED WITH THE SYSTEM STUDY. 

Originating Officer: BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY 

Clas sification 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101928 

Releasing Officer:
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 36/2006

of 10 March 2006         

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 32e (Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2005/438/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 March 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 92, 30.3.2006, p. 44.

(2)OJ L 152, 15.6.2005, p. 19.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135846 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135846 COA: 280442 Wayne CC: 01-008679

CARL HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     2nd Quarter 1999 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003638
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         309
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                   99
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3
<PP&E>                                         33,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,916
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,601
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (21)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                208
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   208
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

BYE-4077-64 

Copy of 3 

13 February 1964 

REPORT 162 

STOPPER NEW IDEA 

RECOMMENDATION: 

In addition to the tracker which I suggested in report 126, 

I have had a second idea that I would like to propose. I have EDL working 

on the engineering for it. I propose that this idea replace Logic S in the 

proposal for STOPPER IL As I have reported before Logic S is not, in my 

opinion, of marginal value. This idea looks good to me but maybe I am 

biased in favor of my idea. 

The idea would be as follows: each time Logic A is activated, a 

measuring circuit much simpler than Logic S would be activated to measure 

the spaces between the next ten or so pulse. This would be recorded on 

the commutator and be read out thereby giving us a very accurate picture of 

the train of pulses that had tripped Logic A. This is good environmental 

data -- much better than Logic S and will have no redundancy in its output. 

The addition of this idea let us call it Logic Q and the tracker of report 

126 will be less involved than Logic S would have been.. 

RECOMMENDATION: That we build STOPPER U as proposed by EDL Iess 

Logic S plus the tracker stick of report (which tells us (a) it sees a 98 ?GS 

signal and (b) that signal is or is not tracking us (constant amplitude 

pulses) and plus Logic Q, a series of n. pulse spaces separations following 

HANDLE VIA r3‘V'T-r 

CONITH SYSTE,-,1 

----______" 

Excluded r; 1;;p 

awrIgra,"'" 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

BYE-4077-64 

Page 2 

an activation of Logic A. 

This looks like a good package to rae. We await your decision. 

Distribution: 

I (GEL 

2 - AD/OSA 

3 - OEL Registry 

10EL, Kit/6941 Typed 25 Feb 64
•

j;

MIN 30 March 1955

DEPARTMENT OF THE MR FORCE

NEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR PONCE

WASHINGTON EL D. C.

NEKORANDUN FOR OENERAL MIT

SUBJECT: AO/ATONE

The MUMMA correspondence is informally directed to DCB/0

for ocement. However, DCB/D hes certain interests. Our interest

involves an understanding and definition of gAssumptions as to procurement, paragraph 4.' I believe that =wants the present DOWD

organisation to act as thOrmateriel headquarters throughout

AADATONB I s life. This prObealyincludes the procurement and handling

of all specialised and other GTE required to support three overseas

bases.

Other commute are as follows:

No single responsible Air Force agency. CIA oan deal

directly with DCS/D, SAC, AFOIN, ATC, and possibly other Air Form

organisations when required.

The Air Force will have broad operational planning

privileges, but the entire training and operational control is a

CIA function and responsibility. Main Air Form participation in

the project is simply a planning and support role.

c. Funding for the project is about equally distributed

between CIA and the Air Force.

3. It is recommended that:

s. DCS/D contimmid.th our present responsibilities

associated with the project.

b. That BAC be responsible for all materiel and GM support

required for overseas operations.

o. That the Air Force participate in the operational phase

of AQUATONE jointly with CIA under one responsible Air Force officer.

CIA should haw final operational authority.

ern, le r .7-0

E /We lf

Dire .

.1),Y--T,TC a esI

•
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	NROL-70 Launches on Final Delta IV Heavy Rocket
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/135/transparent.png?ver=B2YYtOxzg52QYDIqGLCDCQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">NROL-70 Launches on Final Delta IV Heavy Rocket</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/21/2003284507/1920/1080/0/720801-F-RQ659-0029.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="NRO logo- smaller"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">NRO logo</div>
            <div class="image-caption">image of NRO logo</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published April 9, 2024</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, FL, </span>
    NROL-70 Launches on Final Delta IV Heavy Rocket. -<br /><br /><a href="/Portals/135/Documents/news/press/2024/NROL-70_Press_Release_Final_20240409.pdf?ver=rxoUeZzNwUbpO3OgQGmTUA%3d%3d" target ="_blank" >SEE THE PRESS RELEASE</a><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
HomeRadioactive WasteStorage of Spent Nuclear FuelSpent Fuel Pools

# Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Criticality Management Documents

        - Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Management Database – ML13212A064
        - Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Management Database Spring 2014 Update – ML14024A142
        - Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Management Technical Letter Report – ML113550241

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Criticality Management Documents
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Public Meeting Materials
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Generic Communications
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Guidance Documents
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
_ADP-SECRET'

••n••:.0 1•4

---nunnEymE_

2•:00.

vtai NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGT0h. D.C.

March 1, 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Meetings With General Allison

On February 26, at the invitation of Captain Kruzel

of ACSAN, I attended a briefing on the Soviet anti-satellite

capability. The briefing was given in General Allison's

office by Captain Sturges from FTD. General Allison had

requested the briefing following his return from a meeting

of the. North Atlantic Council of Ministers in Brussels.

At the meeting, the subject of Soviet anti-satellite efforts

had been raised by Brosio, the. Secretary General of NAC.

The briefing was very lucid and was very similar to the

discussion of the subject given by Dr. Cook recently at

the Land Panel dry run.

Later in the day, I met briefly with General Allison

to discuss several items which were felt to be of interest

to him. I impressed upon him that although our satellites

are indeed vulnerable, the current SNIE estimates that

there isn't likely present Soviet malintent. Also mentioned

was that there wa

na

Ix was being prepared for Dr. Naka's signature to request

Mr. Helms to have the NATO and SALT participants cautioned

against entering open discussions of our satellite program.

rta -

TglAtt4-1-vf

.1010./

_K- 5.0P-F•ECREr

OW/4k b•grfr #11,20 4.404.41.: al6aa0o..

MIS V.% I • 1 MI, •n•C:

Internal COMM 60

CO.! Of COONS

patat
_TOP-SECREC

General Allison expressed his appreciation for the

information. He stated that he doesn't believe that

the Soviets would jeopardize their own programs at this

time by attacking one of our satellites.

HARD S. COYLE, JR.

Major, USAF

carrIDL Internal

--TALENT401011-- con or CMIE1

t • S • tft fill...1342 • NM irO•a gu pc.aaDIV•

•rc • .f WO: • C q0. s+dit
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     -------------------------------------------------------------
                                       1998          1997         1996         1995         1994
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                            (IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                  <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
FIXED CHARGES:
  Gross interest expense             $  14,414    $   6,811    $   6,365    $   5,297    $   3,597
  Interest portion of rent expense          39           32           29           25           20
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                        14,453        6,843        6,394        5,322        3,617

EARNINGS:
  Income (loss) before taxes          (113,440)      33,423       10,847       (4,112)       5,951
  Plus:  fixed charges                  14,453        6,843        6,394        5,322        3,617
  Less:  capitalized interest           (9,817)      (5,873)      (3,490)      (2,899)      (1,495)
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                     $(108,804)   $  34,393    $  13,751    $  (1,689)   $   8,073

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES       N/M            5.0x         2.2x       N/M            2.2x
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00351-CR

Robert C. Morris

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 1

of Parker County (CCL 96-1806)

December 18, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date:April 16, 2012                                                            By:/s/ Stephen Chen


Stephen Chen


Chairman, Chief Executive Officer





Date:April 16, 2012                                                            By:/s/ Bernard Cohen


Bernard Cohen


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005103EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2005

(2005/C 103/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2920 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4472 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1403 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5434 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1270 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5820 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,225 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,52 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4294 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2197 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 160 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,61 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,620 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7763 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6654 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6121 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0761 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7917 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1290 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 295,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8992 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6932 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 351,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,910 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,253 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,143 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2920

JPY

Japanese yen

137,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4472

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67960

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1403

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5434

ISK

Iceland króna

82,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1270

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5820

CZK

Czech koruna

30,225

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,52

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4294

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2197

ROL

Romanian leu

36 160

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,61

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,620

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7763

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6654

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6121

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0761

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7917

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1290

KRW

South Korean won

1 295,75

ZAR

South African rand

7,8992

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6932

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 351,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,910

PHP

Philippine peso

70,253

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9250

THB

Thai baht

51,143

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---