alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS & STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          59,252                 414,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,000                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,252                 414,903
<PP&E>                                           3,239                   2,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (750)                     (0)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,806                 417,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,321                  21,005
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         7,538                   5,980
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,947                 390,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,806                 417,642
<SALES>                                         96,750                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,750                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,768                 103,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,018)               (103,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,018)               (103,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,018)               (103,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-30513) of
Multicom Publishing, Inc. of our report dated October 10, 1997 appearing on page
13 of this Form 10-KSB.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-08417) of Multicom Publishing, Inc. of our report
dated October 10, 1997 appearing on page 13 of this Form 10-KSB.
 
                                          PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
Seattle, Washington
October 10, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2158 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2158

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2017

  Mr. Beyer (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Pallone, Mr. 
Grijalva, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Keating, Mr. Hastings, 
  Ms. Blunt Rochester, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Langevin, Mr. 
Sanford, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Scott of Virginia, 
 and Mr. Price of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atlantic Seismic Airgun Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE HYDRATE-RELATED SEISMIC 
              ACTIVITIES IN NORTH ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH 
              ATLANTIC, AND STRAITS OF FLORIDA PLANNING AREAS OF OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1340) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Moratorium on Oil-, Gas-, and Methane Hydrate-Related Seismic 
Activities in North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits 
of Florida Planning Areas.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
no person or agency of the United States may conduct geological or 
geophysical activities (as those terms are described in the final 
programmatic environmental impact statement of the Bureau of Ocean 
Energy Management entitled `Atlantic OCS Proposed Geological and 
Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Planning Areas' 
and completed February 2014) in support of oil, gas, or methane hydrate 
exploration or development in any area located in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, or Straits of Florida planning areas of 
the outer Continental Shelf.''.
                                 <all>
```
MSA deaths total NAME ST pm25_00 80 382 1390 AKRO OH 15.9 160 1194 4351 ALBA NY 11.1 200 672 2721 ALBU NM 5.8 240 1710 5978 ALLE PA 13.2 520 2415 9699 ATLA GA 18.7 730 197 741 BANG ME 8.5 760 319 1193 BATO LA 14.5 880 209 861 BILL MT 8 1010 118 464 BISM ND 7 1080 165 664 BCIT ID 8.9 1120 1401 6140 BOST MA 11.3 1160 79 293 BRID CT 13.6 1280 885 3389 BUFF NY 13.5 1320 1111 3815 CANT OH 18.3 1360 595 2662 CRAP IO 11.4 1440 516 1814 CHAR SC 12.9 1480 356 1222 CHAR WV 17.4 1520 1246 4503 CHAR NC 16 1600 7348 26459 CHIC IL 16.7 1640 2278 8036 CINC OH 17.9 1680 2204 8254 CLEV OH 16.8 1720 193 728 COLO CO 6.6 1760 933 3158 COLU SC 15.6 1800 317 1171 COLU GA 17 1840 754 3196 COLU OH 18.3 1920 2454 10354 DALL TX 13.9 2000 1828 6732 DAYT OH 16.6 2080 1643 6043 DENV CO 9.6 2120 283 999 DMOI IO 10.7 2160 4131 16488 DETR MI 15.5 2240 356 1254 DULU MN 8.1 2320 678 2505 EPAS TX 9.6 2360 415 1309 ERIE PA 12.8 2440 709 2474 EVAN IN 16.5 2520 189 811 FARG ND 8.9 2640 688 2701 FLIN MI 12.5 2670 278 976 FCOL CO 7.9 2680 3155 9594 FLAU FL 8.8 2840 336 1506 FRES CA 22.2 2960 1866 6852 GARY IN 15 2985 165 656 GFOR ND 9.5 3060 53 271 GREE CO 8.2 3120 809 2981 GREE NC 16.8 3160 898 3311 GREE SC 16.7 3200 337 1330 HAMI OH 18.2 3240 921 3317 HARR PA 14.5 3360 1001 5000 HOUS TX 14.8 3400 508 1783 HUNT WV 17.7 3480 1449 5306 INDI IN 15.8 3640 478 1976 JCIT NJ 15.2 3680 441 1698 JOHN PA 14.93760 1427 5117 KANS MO 12.3 3800 603 2400 KENO WI 12 4000 831 3230 LANC PA 16.5 4040 757 2924 LANS MI 12.8 4120 322 1080 LVEG NV 7.6 4240 131 456 LEWI ME 9.9 4400 940 3153 LROC AR 15.9 4480 6357 24403 LANG CA 20.2 4720 1074 4136 MADI WI 12.9 4920 2308 7859 MEMP TN 15 5080 1499 6007 MILW WI 13.7 5120 3610 16472 MINN MN 10.9 5380 2828 12973 NASS NY 12 5400 68 214 NBED MA 11.1 5480 1350 5275 NHAV CT 14.4 5560 487 1778 NORL LA 14.4 5600 2871 10770 NYOR NY 14.9 5640 2284 9158 NEWA NJ 14.4 5720 1558 5313 NORF VA 12.6 5880 31 157 OKLA OK 10.5 5960 1427 4709 ORLA FL 11 6040 637 2873 PATE NJ 13.6 6160 3913 15130 PHIL PA 14 6200 3257 9700 PHOE AZ 11.8 6280 3642 12311 PITT PA 16.1 6400 418 1336 PORT ME 9.9 6440 1649 6043 PORT OR 8.2 6480 1971 7511 PROV RI 11.3 6560 138 602 PUEB CO 7 6640 635 2501 RALE NC 15.2 6680 367 1416 READ PA 14.7 6720 92 335 RENO NV 9.3 6760 1333 5029 RICH VA 13.9 6780 1208 3872 RIVE CA 20 6800 600 2094 ROAN VA 14.6 6840 935 3234 ROCH NY 11.4 6920 1545 5802 SACR CA 14 6960 635 2295 SAGI MI 10.2 7040 2169 8428 SLOU MO 16 7160 3371 9961 SLAK UT 10.2 7320 1555 5093 SDIE CA 15.7 7360 1868 6944 SFRA CA 12.5 7400 1643 6480 SJOS CA 14.6 7600 1709 6968 SEAT WA 9.5 7680 218 890 SHRE LA 14.3 7800 505 1704 SBEN IN 13.3 7840 567 2262 SPOK WA 8.7 8000 615 2280 SPRI MA 11.5 8080 568 1678 STEU OH 17.5 8160 777 2846 SYRA NY 11 8200 576 2177 TACO WA 10.7 8280 3630 10857 TAMP FL 128320 369 1246 THAU IN 15.6 8400 1104 3872 TOLE OH 15.3 8440 623 2259 TOPE KS 11.7 8480 458 1790 TREN NJ 12.2 8520 752 2577 TUCS AZ 8.5 8680 715 2603 UTIC NY 11 8840 4241 16917 WASH DC 14.5 8920 271 997 WATE IO 11.9 9040 997 3231 WICH KS 11.9 9160 534 2102 WILM DE 14.5 9240 340 1304 WORC MA 11.8 9280 296 1098 YORK PA 15.8 9320 821 2776 YOUN OH 16.1
# C_2004296EN.01000101.xml

| 1.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 November 2004

(2004/C 296/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3295 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4287 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9238 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5114 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5795 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,988 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,74 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6872 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4324 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2075 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 405 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,82 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,280 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 899 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7147 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5785 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3365 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8555 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1772 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 393,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7068 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3295

JPY

Japanese yen

136,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4287

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69660

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9238

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5114

ISK

Iceland króna

86,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5795

CZK

Czech koruna

30,988

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,74

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6872

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4324

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2075

ROL

Romanian leu

38 405

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,82

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,280

TRL

Turkish lira

1 899 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7147

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5785

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3365

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8555

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1772

KRW

South Korean won

1 393,85

ZAR

South African rand

7,7068

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Simone Blank, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                  |  |                                                                                   
|---------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|December 4, 2009 |  | /s/ Simone Blank
|                 |  | Name:            |  | Simone Blank                                                                      
|                 |  | Title:           |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and will be
retained by Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111945 

TOP SECRET HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. HANDLE VIA 

JYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL SYStEM.S JQlti"IL.'t. 

THE NRO STAFF 

17 February 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL WORTHMAN 

SUBJECT: DIA TALENT Information Letter No. 10 

Reference our discussion of 14 February 1969, I have 

prepared the attached letter tol lfor your signature. This letter provides~-a-s~t_a_t_e_m_e_n_t_o~f~policy for 

access to the satellite camera manuals, that is not now 

included in the manuals, nor was it provided in Dr. Flax's 

cover letter during their distribution. 

I believe the policy as stated emphasizes the "must 

know" concept, yet provides enough latitude to permit 

access under certain specific cases where access to the 

TALENT controlled documents is more desirable than granting 

BYEMAN access. 

Captain, USAF 

Dep Asst for Security 

NRO Staff 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTlVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111945 

CONTROL NO INTERN AL 

COPY ___ or ___ COPIES 

PAGE_~l_or_------'l=-- PAGES
October 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Pasture and Hay Planting (Code 512) 

Pasture and hay planting is establishing adapted and

compatible species, varieties, or cultivars of perennial

herbaceous plants suitable for pasture or hay production. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to all lands suitable for establishment

of perennial species for pasture and hay production. This

practice does not apply to establishment of annually

planted and harvested food, fiber, or oilseed crops. 

Pasture and hay planting can help improve or maintain livestock nutrition and/or health, provide or

increase forage supply during periods of low forage production, reduce soil erosion, and improve

water and air quality. 

Considerations for plant species selection can include climatic conditions such as annual precipitation

and its distribution, growing season length, temperature extremes, and the USDA Plant Hardiness

Zone. 

Soil condition and landscape position attributes, such as pH, available water holding capacity, aspect,

slope, drainage class, fertility level, salinity, depth, flooding and ponding, and levels of phytotoxic

elements may be important considerations. Resistance to disease and insects common to the site or

location may also be important. 

Planting rates, methods, and dates may be recommended from the NRCS Plant Materials Program,

other NRCS technical documents, land grant and research institutions, and extension agencies. Land

grant university field trials of various forages can be helpful in selecting forage species for planting, as

well. 

Refer to the local NRCS Field Office Technical Guide for information on cultural specifications for

establishing and managing the species for the intended use. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Pasture and Hay Planting (Code 512) is commonly

applied with other conservation practices, such as NRCS CPSs Forage Harvest Management (Code

511), Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Code 315), Nutrient Management (Code 590), Prescribed

Grazing (Code 528), and Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (Code 645). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Conservation Cover, Fence, Forage and Biomass Planting, Forest Stand Improvement, Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Prescribed Grazing, Riparian Forest Buffer, Stream Habitat Improvement and Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Structure for Water Control, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# C_2005045EN.01001102.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 16 December 2004

in Case C-172/04: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose - Directive 1999/31/EC - Waste management - Landfill of waste - Inert waste from building and public works)

(2005/C 45/22)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-172/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C.-F Durand and M. Konstantinidis) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and C. Mercier) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 7 April 2004 – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann and J. Kluÿka (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
#### Byrka, Appellant, vs. Peterson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *W. T. Doar*and *W. P. Knowles*III, both of New Richmond.

For the respondent: *F. E. Yates*of Amery,

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004251EN.01002701.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/27

---

Action brought on 22 July 2004 by Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén against Council of the European Union

(Case T-295/04)

(2004/C 251/49)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 July 2004 by Centro Provincial de Jóvenes Agricultores de Jaén, established in Jaen (Spain), represented by José Francisco Vázquez Medina, of the Jaen Bar.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul ipso jure Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/04 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul ipso jure Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/04

| — | reserve its decision on costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve its decision on costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is contesting the abovementioned provision insofar as it includes, exclusively in respect of olive oil, the 1999/2000 marketing year together with the other 3 planned for the remaining agricultural sectors (2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003), for the determination of the direct support to be provided for producers.

In support of its claims, the applicant maintains that not only is there an inadequate statement of reasons for the contested provision, contrary to the duty to provide reasons, it also discriminates against certain regions and many farmers in view of the fact that in the 1999/2000 marketing year the harvest was very poor in Andalusia, particularly in Jaen. Thus, by calculating the assistance to be provided by taking into account the aforementioned marketing year, olive oil producers in Jaen, together with others in Cordoba and Granada, will, by that mere fact, suffer serious economic harm and thus be discriminated against.

Finally, the applicant alleges misuse of powers.

---