alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4
                                                                    ------------

       Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       -------------------------------------------------------------------



         I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., Senior Vice President of Finance, in my
capacity as principal financial and accounting officer of Pegasus Communications
Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of Pegasus Communications Corporation
for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 ("Amendment No. 1"), which this
certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
information contained in Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pegasus
Communications Corporation.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pegasus Communications Corporation and will be retained by
Pegasus Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  April 30, 2003


                                                      /s/ Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
#### Wagnitz, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, Appellant.

For the appellant: *North, Parker, Bie & Welsh,*attorneys, and *Samuel D. Hastings,*of counsel, all of Green Bay.

For the respondent: *John V. Diener*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

# AGENCY:

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Commerce published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 2, 2015, concerning request for comments on a proposed information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB Control No. 0648-0449. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Charles M. Wahle, Senior Scientist, NOAA's National Marine Protected Areas Center, via email at                         *charles.wahle@noaa.gov*, or by telephone: (831) 647-6460.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 2, 2015, Vol. 80, No. 21, on page 5515, in the third column, correct the “Dates” caption to read: “                    **DATES**                    : Written comments must be submitted on or before April 3, 2015”.                

Dated: February 5, 2015.

Glenna Mickelson,

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-02741 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, James M. Fornear, Chief Financial Officer of AML CommunicationsInc., (the “Company), certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMLCommunications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: February 14, 2006 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ James M. Fornear    |   |   |
| By: James M. Fornear    |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

----
### Re: Ozone background Susan Stone to: Laura Blackburn 02/11/2010 08:38 AM Cc: Tricia Crabtree

Ms. Blackburn: I apologize for taking so long to get back to you. You asked me to provide you with some information on policy relevant background. I was not sure how technical a response you wanted, so decided to provide more information rather than less. This information should answer your questions. I am attaching the ozone Response to Comments Document (RTC - from the 2008 review) and the page numbers of relevant comments and responses. I'm also attaching the Staff Paper and providing page numbers for the short section on background. The remote monitor site in California most influenced by policy relevant background concentrations of ozone is called Trinidad Head - you will see it referenced frequently.

Ozone RTC 1. Section IIA5, comments 20 - 22, pages 92 - 97. Comment/Response 20 is the most relevant; the third bullet in the comment is about estimates of background levels using the Trinidad Head monitor. 2. Section IIB4, comments 2 - 4, pages 129 - 131. Comment 4 expresses policy relevant background levels in terms of W126. 3. Section IID, comment 3, page 143. WRT the monitoring proposal, we indicate that increased numbers of rural monitors will help with the estimation of background levels of ozone.

Staff Paper 1. PRB is discussed on pages 2-48 to 2-55 (4 pages of figures). It is interesting to note that we did estimate PRB for the 12 urban areas, and that GEOS-CHEM model estimates PRB on a grid across the US (last paragraph, p. 2-55).

Again , I apologize for taking so long to respond. I responded to most enquiries with a Blackberry while on travel but could not do that with your question, and so put it off. Hope this information is useful. Susan

Susan Lyon Stone Ambient Standards Group l US EPA (C504-06) l Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-1146 l Fax: 919- 541-0237 l HSD Phone 919-966-6226

Laura Blackburn 02/05/2010 10:25:59 AM Susan,

From: Laura Blackburn <laura2blackburn@yahoo.com> To: Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/05/2010 10:25 AM Subject: Ozone background



### Susan,

You may have heard that the subject of how background is measured came up at the Houston hearing, and the h e ozone standard. I think I remember her explanation, but I'm not sure. Would you mind sending me the protoco l what that level was determined to be? (I think it was .012 to .035 p p m , but I'm not sure.)

Many thanks, Laura Blackburn,

### Air Quality Chair, League of Women Voters of Texas
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bruker AXS Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin Haase, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|March 21, 2003 |  | /s/MARTIN HAASEMartin Haase
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of NextPhase  Wireless,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB for the period  ended  December  31, 2005 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2006                        /s/ Robert Ford
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert Ford
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                                     5
 <CIK>                                          0001003390
  <NAME>                                        LEISUREPLANET HOLDINGS, LTD.

<S>                                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Jun-30-2000
  <PERIOD-START>                                Jul-1-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1999
  <CASH>                                        17,535,700
  <SECURITIES>                                  0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                 16,647,752
  <ALLOWANCES>                                  461,644
  <INVENTORY>                                   9,600,855
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                              49,757,046
  <PP&E>                                        31,831,379
  <DEPRECIATION>                                12,444,665
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                103,768,244
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,768,894
  <BONDS>                                       0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         9,891,197
  <PREFERRED>                                   0
  <COMMON>                                      64,843
  <OTHER-SE>                                    17,530,911
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  103,768,244
  <SALES>                                       22,721,938
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22,721,938
  <CGS>                                         15,167,513
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                 24,369,281
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (209,481)
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            210,760
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,648,622)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                  554,386
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,833,436)
  <DISCONTINUED>                                0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
  <CHANGES>                                     0
  <NET-INCOME>                                  (2,314,895)
  <EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.44)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.44)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Dr. Ralf P. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 27, 2013



/s/    DR. RALF P.
THOMASName: Dr. Ralf P. Thomas Title:   Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2004262EN.01001501.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) by order of that court of 24 June 2004 in the criminal proceedings against Attila Vajnai

(Case C-328/04)

(2004/C 262/27)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Fővárosi Bíróság, Hungary, of 24 June 2004, received at the Court Registry on 30 July 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings against Attila Vajnai on the following question:

Is Article 269/B, first paragraph, of the Büntető Törvénykönyv (Hungarian Criminal Code), which provides that a person who uses or displays, in public, the symbol consisting of a five-pointed red star commits — where the conduct does not amount to a more serious criminal offence — a minor offence, compatible with the fundamental Community-law principle of non-discrimination? Do Article 6 TEU, according to which the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, Directive 2000/43/EC (1), which also refers to fundamental freedoms, and Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, allow a person who wishes to express his political convictions through a symbol representing them to do so in any Member State?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 180, p. 22.

1

---
Record of Discu ss ion Docket No. FAA- Dire ctorate Ident i fier: -A D



### With whom outside the FAA ha s this AD action b ee n di sc ussed (i. e., De s ig n Approval Hold er, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DAT E TOPI CS DIS CUSSED Boeing Stev e Cha pman 2/24/ 2015 Safety analysis, decis ion

Oth e r / Additional Information:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001004540
<NAME>                        AIRPLANES US TRUST
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                   6
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           10
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (7)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         9
<PP&E>                                                 386
<DEPRECIATION>                                         159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    9
<BONDS>                                                321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (197)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           236
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        21
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          (11)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        (1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        (2)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (24)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (16)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (16)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 22
                                   ----------



The subsidiaries of ATSI Communications, Inc. are as follows:

      State or Other Company                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
      ----------------------                      -----------------------------
ATSI Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. ("ATSI-COM")                   Mexico (Note 1)
American TeleSource International, Inc.                          Canada
Sistema de Telefonia Computarizada, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
   ("Computel")
ATSI de CentroAmerica, S.A.                                      Costa Rica



Note 1:
Currently ATSI owns 49% of the stock of this entity.
#### STATE v. ANTHONY MEACHAM.

*Indictment--Lareeny*— Evidence—Judge's *Charge.*

'•On a trial for larceny, where the defendant who was charged with stealing a hog contended that certain pork found in his house was _part of a hog of his own; and two of his children testified that the defendant had killed a hog of his own the day before the pork was found, it was error for the Court to instruct the jury ‘’that there was no evidence that the hog was the property of any one except the prosecutor.”

INDICTMENT for Larceny, tried at Fall Term, 1877, of Richmond Superior Court, before *Seymour, J.*

The defendant was charged with stealing a hog, and that part of the case bearing upon the point decided by this Court, is as follows; — “ The defendant contended that the pork (which was found in defendant’s house by virtue of a .search warrant obtained by the prosecutor) was part of a hog of his own, and introduced two of his children who testified that he had killed a hog of his own the day before.” His Honor charged the jury that they must be satisfied that the pork found in defendant’s possession was stolen, that defendant was connected with the stealing, and that the stolen hog was the one lost by the prosecutor. After retiring the jury came into Court for further instructions; and.one of the jury stated that they had agreed upon the two first points, but that one of them doubted whether the hog was proved to be the property of the prosecutor. In reply His Honor stated that the question was one of fact which they must determine, and after recapitulating the evidence, .added; “And there is no evidence that the hog was the property of any one except the prosecutor.” To this last remark the defendant excepted. Verdict of guilty. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*478
      *Attorney General,*for tlie State.

No counsel for the defendant.

Reade, J.

Fresh pork cut up and unsalted being found in the house of defendant, and the question being whether it was his own?Jmeat or whether he had stolen, the hog out of which it was made, and there being no evidence tending-to show that he had stolen the hog out of which it was made, the defendant introduced two of the members of his family who swore that the defendant had killed one of his own hogs for pork the day before. His Honor instructed the jury that there was *no evidence*that the meat found was the meat of the defendant. In this there was error.

Error.

Per Curiam. *Venire de novo.*