alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015222EN.01000101.xml

| 7.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/1

---

COUNCIL ACT

of 4 December 2014

extending the term of office of a Deputy Director of Europol

(2015/C 222/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Decision 2009/371/JHA establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (1), and in particular Article 38 paragraphs 1 to 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the Decision of the Management Board of Europol of 4 June 2009 establishing the rules on the selection, extension of the term of office and dismissal of the Director and Deputy Directors of Europol (2), and in particular Article 12 paragraph 1 thereof,

2

Acting as the authority vested with the power to appoint the Director and Deputy Directors of Europol,

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board,

WHEREAS:

| (1) | The term of office of a Deputy Director of Europol appointed by Council Act of 20 October 2011 (3), is due to expire on 31 October 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of a Deputy Director of Europol appointed by Council Act of 20 October 2011 (3), is due to expire on 31 October 2015.

3

| (2) | The Deputy Directors of Europol are appointed for a 4-year period extendable once in accordance with Article 38(2) of the Council Decision establishing the European Police Office (Europol). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Deputy Directors of Europol are appointed for a 4-year period extendable once in accordance with Article 38(2) of the Council Decision establishing the European Police Office (Europol).

| (3) | The Management Board presented the Council with an opinion proposing that the term of office of the present Deputy Director of Europol, Mr Oldřich MARTINŮ, be extended. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Board presented the Council with an opinion proposing that the term of office of the present Deputy Director of Europol, Mr Oldřich MARTINŮ, be extended.

| (4) | On the basis of the opinion provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to extend the term of office of Mr Oldřich MARTINŮ as Deputy Director, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On the basis of the opinion provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to extend the term of office of Mr Oldřich MARTINŮ as Deputy Director,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The term of office of Mr Oldřich MARTINŮ is hereby extended from 1 November 2015 to 31 October 2019 at grade AD 14, step 1.

Article 2

This Act shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2014.

For the Council

The President

A. ORLANDO

---

(1)  OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37.

1

(2)  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ C 310, 22.10.2011, p. 5.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 13,983
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          72,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,805
<INVENTORY>                                            86,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      184,117
<PP&E>                                                 30,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                         11,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        324,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  75,323
<BONDS>                                                   562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  341
<OTHER-SE>                                            239,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          324,411
<SALES>                                                64,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       64,929
<CGS>                                                  42,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          42,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        5,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (2,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (1,294)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (1,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,491)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.04)


</TABLE>
# C_2004239EN.01002803.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/28

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-280/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/62)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 4 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-280/99, Van Gelder Aardolie B.V., supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 19.2.2000.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 3,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                          22,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,429
<INVENTORY>                                     45,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,475
<PP&E>                                          23,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,275
<BONDS>                                             32
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,984
<SALES>                                         64,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,121
<CGS>                                           37,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
Taylor Cupp

January 23 rd 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Dear Madam, Sir, I am supplying additional information requested in order to finalize processing of my Section 333 Ex emption request for section **14 C.F.R.**  **§ 11.81**  as it relates to how granting an exemption to my request would be in the public interest . My f il ed Docket No. is FAA - 2015 - 4914 and ex emption request was submitted on July 28 th 2015. Granting the request for my exemption request would benefit the public , \ as I will conduct the commercial UAS operation in a manner that will meet, and in many c ases exceed the current level of safety

o f commercial manned flight operations. My UAV service will offer a less disruptive, more fuel efficient, safer, and effective data collection method to the construction industry than manned aviation equivalent . This is due to the low altitude flight, size, speed and inherent risk of UAV flight under the platform that Ihave requested my exemption . Utilizing a UAV will also allow me to provide my customers a service and platform that will also save money

and increase wor

kflow efficiency . Most importantl y, the unmanned aspect decreases the risk of placing employees in hazardous conditions often required by traditional data collection methods in the construction industry . Insummary, Ifeel that I

should be granted my

request for exemption by :  Reducing the collateral damage risks to life and property associated with low altitude manned flight operations in undesirable portions of the height
- velocity envelope.  Reduced environmental impact as the result of operation.  Increased economic wellbeing to local businesses via cost reductions.  Enabling aerial business solutions to be available to a larger market. Yours sincerely, Taylor Cupp 6268 55 th Avenue South Fargo, ND 58104 PH: 612 - 834 - 7015 Email : taylorcupp@gmail .com
# C_2005035EN.01000101.xml

| 10.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 February 2005

(2005/C 35/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2762 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6858 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0755 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5575 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,92 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,354 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5831 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,93 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,3 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4299 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0207 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 767 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,74 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,08 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6647 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5949 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9541 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8209 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1049 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9766 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2762

JPY

Japanese yen

134,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6858

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0755

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5575

ISK

Iceland króna

80,92

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,354

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5831

CZK

Czech koruna

29,93

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,3

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4299

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0207

ROL

Romanian leu

36 767

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,74

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,08

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6647

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5949

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9541

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8209

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1049

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,78

ZAR

South African rand

7,9766

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004130EN.01000201.xml

| 6.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/2

---

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS

European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)

Support for Democracy, Good Governance and the Rule of Law

EuropeAid/119508/C/G

(2004/C 130/02)

The European Commission is seeking proposals for support for democracy, good governance and the rule of law in one or more EIDHR focus countries, listed in the Guidelines, with financial assistance from the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights programme of the European Communities.

The full Guidelines for Applicants are available for consultation at ‘European Commission, EuropeAid Unit F6, 54 Rue Joseph II, office 01/140, 1049 Brussels, Belgium’ and on the following Internet site:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl

The deadline for submission of preliminary proposals is 29.06.2004, 16:00 Brussels time.

---
# C_2005050EN.01001101.xml

| 26.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/11

---

FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS

FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR SPECIFIC CO-FUNDED PROJECTS 2005

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR SPECIFIC CO-FUNDED PROJECTS

(2005/C 50/10)

A call for proposals concerning the FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS is currently launched. The priorities, the full text of the call, the application forms and the guidelines can be found on the website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/funding/civil_cooperation/funding_civil_cooperation_en.htm

You must return the completed application form and all its annexes to the Commission by 8 April 2005, to the following address:

by 8 April 2005

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security (Unit C.4) |
| Office LX 46-00/151 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles |

European Commission

Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security (Unit C.4)

Office LX 46-00/151

B-1049 Bruxelles

Your envelope must be marked ‘APPLICATION UNDER THE FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS’

---
1

MEMORANDUM

Date: July 30, 2012

Subject: EPA

– EMI

– Felman Corporation Teleconference Summary ( July 2 , 2012)

From: Beth Friedman, EC/R Incorporated

To: Conrad Chin, OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02)

I. Introduction:

A conference call was held on July 2 , 201 2 to discuss the possibility of testing additional pollutants, performing fenceline monitoring, and hosting plant visits at Eramat Marietta (EMI) and Felman Production . This memo provides an overview of the issues discussed.

II. Participants:

Beveridge & Di amond : Amy Lincoln (counsel for Felman) Jones Day : John Rego (counsel for EMI)
EPA/ OAQPS : Conrad Chin, C huck French, Ray Merrill EC/R Incorporated (Contractor for EPA) : Beth Friedman , Brad Nelson

III. Summary of Discussions:

The following topics were discussed

.

 EPA asked the plants if it would be possible in include testing for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins in the July 2012 compliance tests. Both plants replied that there is not enough time to change the test plan and still obtain the
needed co mpliance tests in this short period. The test contractors are already booked, and there is not enough time to conduct more testing given their availability.

 The plants agreed that they could conduct testing for PCBs and dioxins in the proposed next roun d of tests to occur early in 2013, if EPA obtains an extension

t o the court

- ordered promulgation date. Then, additional time would be needed to transmit the results to EPA and for EPA to analyze the data and prepare the
final rule.

 EPA asked if the plants were still considering fenceline monitoring as an alternative option and if they could collect “baseline” data. The plants responded2 that they would need more information to respond to this question. EPA agreed to prepare a proposed fenceline monitoring protocol for review by the plants.

 EPA asked the plants if an EPA observer could attend one or both tests. The plants said that this would not be a problem

.

 EPA said that Mr. Chin and Mr. French were planning to meet with local community groups in Oh io (that meeting has since been postponed). While in the area, they might want to visit one or both plants. Also, the Sierra Club representatives would also like to visit the plants. The plants responded that EPA should put in a formal request regarding t he Sierra Club visitors.

 The plants said that they would like to have more certainty regarding an extension past December 2012.
# C_2004201EN.01000702.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by judgment of that court of 3 March 2004 in the case of Elmeka N.E. against the Minister for Economic Affairs

(Case C-183/04)

(2004/C 201/13)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 3 March 2004, received at the Court Registry on 19 April 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Elmeka N.E. against the Minister for Economic Affairs on the following questions:

The questions in the present case match the questions in Case C-181/04.

---
# C_2004168EN.01000901.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/9

---

Action brought on 20 April 2004 by Koldo Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso against the European Parliament

(Case T-146/04)

(2004/C 168/16)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 20 April 2004 by Koldo Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso, residing in Saint Pierre d'Irube (France), represented by Didier Rouget, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul European Parliament decision of 24 February 2004 to make deductions on the allowances owing to the applicant until his alleged debt to the Parliament is paid off; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul European Parliament decision of 24 February 2004 to make deductions on the allowances owing to the applicant until his alleged debt to the Parliament is paid off;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested decision, the European Parliament found that, in the absence of vouchers attesting to the use of the various parliamentary allowances, the applicant, a Member of Parliament, owed the sum of EUR 118 360.18 and proceeded to make deductions on those allowances.

The applicant contests that decision, arguing that the Parliament infringed the Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members, inter alia on the grounds that it was taken by the Secretary-General of the Parliament and not by the Bureau of the Parliament, as provided for by Article 27 of those rules. The applicant also alleges that the contested decision infringes the principles of objectivity, impartiality, equality and non-discrimination and also the principle that both parties must be heard and the rights of the defence. He also alleges that the contested decision did not contain sufficient reasons and that it is a misuse of powers, since it was adopted to attain purely political objectives. Lastly, the applicant states that there has been a manifest error of appreciation by the Parliament.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                      34,829,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,094,426
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,431,200)
<INVENTORY>                                 26,050,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,825,354
<PP&E>                                       7,810,401
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,149,873)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,131,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,298,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   102,904,578
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,571,409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,131,959
<SALES>                                     43,545,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,545,255
<CGS>                                       30,936,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,936,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,755,032
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (382,740)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,236,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,563,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,673,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,673,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>