alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-KSB (continued)



                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 of Community Central Bank Corporation of our Independent
Auditor's Report, dated January 24, 2003, on the consolidated financial
statements of Community Central Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, which report is included in the 2002 Stockholder Report of Community
Central Bank Corporation.





S/PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC
----------------------

Auburn Hills, Michigan

March 25, 2003
#### Lawrence Milton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO., et al., Appellees.

No. 18846.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 11, 1965.

Decided March 25, 1965.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 5, 1965.

Mr. Ira M. Lowe, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. George U. Cameal, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee, The Evening Star Newspaper Co.

Mr. Roger A. Clark, Washington, D. C., for appellee, The Washington Post Co. Mr. William R. Glendon, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee, The Washington Post Co.

Before Fahy, Washington and Burger, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was the innocent victim of a mistaken identification as the person who committed two serious crimes in the District of Columbia. He was arrested, charged with the crimes and spent some time in jail before being released when the mistake was discovered. Appellees in their newspapers of wide circulation published accounts of his clearance, giving his name, address and other identifying information, with some details of the resumption of his family life after his ordeal. He sued appellees for damages, claiming that such publications invaded his right of privacy. Appellees’ motions *508to dismiss were granted and the complaint was dismissed.

We think the facts as set forth in the complaint, admitted for purposes of the motion to dismiss, failed to state a cause of action. We therefore affirm.

The publications contain no criticism whatever of appellant. There was not the slightest adverse reflection upon him or suggestion of defamation or ridicule of him. His identification as the victim of the mistake, by including his name and otherwise placing him in his environment did not give rise to a recoverable wrong. The principal events were already in the public domain, and were of news interest. The identifying details were incidental to the story and were not an enlargement which carried the publications beyond legitimate bounds. Elmhurst v. Pearson, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 153 F.2d 467 (1946).

Affirmed.
rApproved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111926 

, I tJt' ~tt;Rf I \ 

~ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 

HANDl EI/IA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

IIUIIHlll!m11um11111111~11111111111111m111m111111111 14 00090533D 

THE NRO STAFF July 28, 1969 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Procurement Authority 

At Tab A is a copy of the memorandum which designates the 

Director of Special Projects {OSAF} as the "head of a procuring 

activity" and delegates to him the procurement authority to act 

with respect to all projects and programs entered into or administered under his authority. This is the memorandum which was updated on June 23, 1965 (at the time of General Greer's departure) 

and which has served as General Martin's authority since that time. 

You will note that the authority is granted the Director of Special 

Projects. 

General Greer was designated Director of Special Projects by 

SAF Order 116. 1, the current version of which is dated July 19, 

1962 and appears at Tab B. General Martin has served in this 

capacity since July 1, 1965 with only a personnel action-type document which assigned him as Director of Special Projects. We have 

experienced no difficulty in this regard, but on the other hand, have 

never produced a document which specifically designates an individual 

as Director of that activity to accompany the delegation of procurement authority. 

We believe it is appropriate and desirable, with General King's 

assumption of these duties, to: 

1. update the delegation of authority, and 

2. produce an accompanying document which designates General 

King as Director of that activity. 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111926 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

COPY ___ OF ___ COP1£.S 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES 
i:. \' :,.,.: tl ~I 

D ~ ~,i.v~b-"'11~ 

CUNH/C,._ SYSTEM 

r-Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111926 

' lUP SEEREl ' 

We have prepared these two documents for your signature 

(Tabs C and D). y.;e are in the process of staffing with SAFAA a 

of SAF Order 116. 1. It is our understanding that you 

Projects II in the rewrite of SAF Order 116. 1. 

have revised the updated delegation memorandum and have prepared General King's designation to reflect this change. 

Recommendation: 

That you sign the documents at Tabs C and D. 

I have discussed this matter with Mr. Lang's office and have 

their concurrence in the issuance of these documents. 

WILLIAM R. 

Lt Colonel, USAF 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

CONTROL NO, ______ _ 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD OtRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111926 

COPY ___ oF ___ COPI ES 

PAGE. ___ Of ___ PAG/:'
**Exhibit 21.1**

**List of Subsidiaries of Sirona Dental Systems Inc.**

—SironaDental Services GmbH, Bensheim, Germany 

—Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany 

—Sirona Immobilien GmbH, Bensheim, Germany 

—Schick Technologies Inc., New York 

—Sirona Holding Inc., Delaware 

—Sirona Dental Systems LLC, Delaware 

—Sirona Dental Systems Ltd., London, England 

—Sirona Dental Systems SAS, Paris, France 

—Sirona Dental Systems K.K., Tokyo, Japan 

—Advanced Technology Research s.r.l., Pistoia, Italy 

—FONA Dental Systems Co., Ltd., China 

—Nitram Dental a/s, Risskov, Denmark 

—SiCAT Verwaltungs GmbH, Bonn, Germany 

—SiCAT GmbH & Co. KG, Bonn, Germany 

—Sirona Dental Systems Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd, China 

—Sirona Verwaltungs GmbH, Bensheim, Germany 

—Sirona Dental Systems Pty. Ltd., Sydney,Australia 

—Cyfex AG, Zurich, Switzerland (minority shareholding) 

—Sirona Bermuda Hold Co, LLC 

—Sirona Bermuda Holdings LP 

—Sirona Dental GmbH, Salzburg, Austria 

—Sirona Bermuda I Ltd. 

—Sirona Bermuda II Ltd. 

—BlueX Imaging s.r.l., Milan, Italy 

—Sirona Dental Systems s.r.l., Verona, Italy

—Sirona Technologie GmbH & Co. KG, Bensheim, Germany 

—T.E.M. Tecnologia Elettromedicale s.r.l., Verona, Italy 

—Sirona Holding GmbH,Salzburg, Austria
# C_2005093EN.01004201.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/42

---

(2005/C 93/75)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 82, 2.4.2005

OJ C 82, 2.4.2005

Past publications

OJ C 69, 19.3.2005

OJ C 57, 5.3.2005

OJ C 45, 19.2.2005

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00841- CV

In re Weldon Cow an
ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B URNET COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator W eldon C owan has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov’t C ode § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P . 52. Ba sed upon this rec ord, hi s petition is denied. See W alker v. Pack

er , 827 S.W .2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (re lator has burden of providing court with sufficie nt rec ord to establish rig ht to mandamus relief ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) (1) (re lator must file with petition “a cer tified or sworn copy of ever y document that is materia l to the relator’s claim for r elief a

nd that was filed in a

ny underly ing pr ocee ding” ).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield Filed: De cembe r 23, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION Extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998, and the
unaudited condensed consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months
then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001004317
<NAME>                        IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1998  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1.000  
<CASH>                                                   14,589  
<SECURITIES>                                                  0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                            71,119  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (2,823) 
<INVENTORY>                                                   0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        108,033  
<PP&E>                                                  293,956  
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (73,788) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          867,032  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    76,674  
<BONDS>                                                429,119   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                                   0  
<COMMON>                                                    292  
<OTHER-SE>                                              340,241  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            867,032  
<SALES>                                                 202,547  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        202,547  
<CGS>                                                   106,274  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           179,879  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       23,229  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           1,139  
<INCOME-TAX>                                              1,714  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (575) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0   
<CHANGES>                                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                                              (575)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.02)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.02)  
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 4.1


                    AMENDMENT TO THE BY-LAWS OF HARDINGE INC.

                             DATED FEBRUARY 20, 2001


      Effective February 20, 2001, the first sentence of Article III, Section 3.
of the By-Laws of Hardinge Inc. was amended to read:

   "THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS CONSTITUTING THE ENTIRE BOARD SHALL BE TEN (10)."
# Vermont State Office

356 Mountain View DrSuite #105ColchesterVT05446

802-951-6796

356 Mountain View DrSuite #105ColchesterVT05446

Vermont

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Vermont 
-  Vermont State Office 

Welcome to the State Office website and directory. State level leadership activities happen here at the Colchester, VT office. See information below to reach out or contact program or technical specialists. For local support, contact your county level office or District Conservationist.

## **Welcome to NRCS in Vermont!**

### ***Travis Thomason, State Conservationist***

Vermont NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team. XXXX

----

## Key Contacts

### Travis Thomason

                -    Office: (802) 951-6796 ext. 227Cell: (802) 522-9943 
                -    travis.thomason@usda.gov 

### Luis Aponte

                -    Office: (802) 951-6796, ext. 235Cell: (802) 881-7984 
                -    luis.aponte@usda.gov 

### Kasey Robinson

                -    (620) 931-8092 
                -    kasey.robinson@usda.gov 

### Joe Buford

                -    (802) 951-6796 
                -    joe.buford@usda.gov 

### Phylicxia Moore

                -    Office: (802) 951-6796, ext. 244Cell: (802) 555-9754 
                -    phylicxia.moore@usda.gov 

### Bob Thompson

                -    Office: (802) 951-6796, ext. 232Cell: (802) 503-7969 
                -    bob.thompson@usda.gov 

### Maggie Payne 

                -    Cell: (774) 678-7231 
                -    maggie.payne@usda.gov 

----

##   Vermont State Office Technical and Administrative Specialists
EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, Gordon Leliever, certify that: 

    1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Osprey Gold, Corp; 

    2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

    3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and          for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

    a)                 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated          subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly          during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

    b)                 Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by          this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an          annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

    5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on          our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to          the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s          board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

    a)                 All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting.
# C_2005081EN.01000301.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/3

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 April 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 April 2005

(2005/C 81/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2959 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4502 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68665 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1687 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5527 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,59 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,584 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,031 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4304 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0876 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 627 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,7 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,75 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7521 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6803 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5736 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1063 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8239 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1449 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 306,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0119 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7255 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,422 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 272,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9243 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,944 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,115 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,745 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2959

JPY

Japanese yen

139,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4502

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68665

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1687

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5527

ISK

Iceland króna

78,59

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,584

CZK

Czech koruna

30,031

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4304

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0876

ROL

Romanian leu

36 627

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,7

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,75

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7521

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6803

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5736

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1063

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8239

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1449

KRW

South Korean won

1 306,01

ZAR

South African rand

8,0119

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7255

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,422

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 272,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9243

PHP

Philippine peso

70,944

RUB

Russian rouble

36,115

THB

Thai baht

50,745

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.5    
  


 
 
 

NETZERO, INC.
  AMENDMENT TO STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT    
  


    THIS AMENDMENT TO STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is dated as of April 8, 1999, between Ronald T. Burr ("Founder") and
NetZero, Inc. (the "Company"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to them in that certain Stock Restriction Agreement dated as of
September 11, 1998 (the "Agreement"), between Founder and the Company. 


    In
consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 



    1.  Section 2(c)
of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following language to the end of such paragraph: 



"Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Repurchase Right shall automatically lapse with respect to all shares of Unvested Stock in the event Founder is terminated without cause following, or in connection
with, a Corporate Transaction. As used in this Section, the term "Corporate Transaction" shall mean either of the following shareholder-approved transactions: 


	(i)
	a
merger or consolidation in which securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company's
outstanding securities are transferred to a person or persons different from the persons holding those securities immediately prior to such transaction, or



	(ii)
	the
sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets in complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. 





    2.  In
all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. 







    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 



	

 	
 	
NETZERO, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ MARK R. GOLDSTON   
 Mark R. Goldston
 Chief Executive Officer
	
 	
 	

/s/ RONALD T. BURR   
 Ronald T. Burr











QuickLinks


EXHIBIT 10.5

AMENDMENT TO STOCK RESTRICTION AGREEMENT
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

TIME : 05/13/2005 14: 31 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 

FAX NO./NAME 

DURATION 

PAGE(S) 

RESULT 

MODE 

05/13 14:31 

15204183665 

00: 00: 17 

01 

OK 

STANDARD 

ECM 

CimA coMMSJNI'Ty 

DEPARTMENT OF E ONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIRP. OGRAM 

DATE: May 13,2005 

TO: District 4 Service Center 

FROM: Janet Travis 

RE: 5/16/05 Community mee g 4 

schedule our presentation 

Please call me at 520-562-2234 ext 286 i you have any questions. 4 

Thanks. 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

TIME : 05/13/2005 14: 30 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 05/13 14:29 

FAX NO. /NAME 152021 53831 

DURATION 00: 00: 16 

PAGECS) 01 

RESULT OK 

MODE STANDARD 

ECM 

GJLA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR PROGRAM 

MEMO 

DATk May 13,2005 

TO: Dmtxict 1 Service Center 

FROM: Janet Travis 

RE: 5/16/05 Community meeting 

On May 10 I sent a fax to Greg Lewis requesting that the DEQ air program be added to 

the agenda for the Community meeting on May 16. 

Unfortunately we will not be able to attend this meeting, and will contact you to re 

schedule our presentation. 

Please call me at 520-562-2234 ext 286 if you have any questions. 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

I I 

TIME : 05/13/2005 14:32 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 

FAX NO./NAME 

DURATION 

PAGE (S) RESULT 

MODE 

- - 

OK 

STANDARD 

ECM 

GIlLA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO-AL QUALITY 

AIR PROGRAM 

MEMO 

DATE: May 13,2005 

TO. District 5 Service Center 

FROM. Janet Travis 

RE: 5/16/05 Community meeting 

On May 10 1 sent a fax to Greg Lewis requesting that the DEQ air program be added to 

the agenda for the Community meeting on May 16. 

Udortunately we will sot be able to attend this meeting, and will contact you to reschedule our presentation. 

Please call me at 520-562-2234 ext. 286 if you have any questions.