alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23


                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made as of
December 31, 1998, between Channell Commercial Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and William H. Channell, Jr. ("Executive"), with
reference to the Employment Agreement between the parties dated as of July 8,
1996 (the "Employment Agreement").  Except as otherwise defined in this
Amendment, capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings given in the
Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants contained herein and in the
Employment Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   Amendment to Employment Agreement.  Section 3.2 of the Employment 
          ---------------------------------        
Agreement is hereby amended to add to the end of such Section the following:

     "Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any annual cash bonus program
     of the Company (whether pursuant to the 1996 Performance Based Annual
     Incentive Compensation Plan or otherwise), Executive shall be entitled to
     receive payment of the annual cash bonus amount computed with respect to
     each Term Year only if Executive continues to provide full-time services to
     the Company as follows (it being the intention that the annual bonus
     computed with respect to each Term Year be earned and paid only if such
     continued service requirement is satisfied):  if full-time employment
     continues through March 31 of the year following the Term Year, 30% of
     payment to be made; if full-time employment continues through June 30 of
     the year following the Term Year, 30% of payment to be made; if full-time
     employment continues through September 30 of the year following the Term
     Year, 20% of the payment to be made; and if full-time employment continues
     through December 31 of the year following the Term Year, 20% of the payment
     to be made."

     2.   No Other Changes.  Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the
          ----------------                                                      
Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with
its terms.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the 
first date set forth above.

                                        CHANNELL COMMERCIAL
                                        CORPORATION

/s/ Willliam H. Channell, Jr.           /s/ Gary W. Baker
-----------------------------           ------------------------------
William H. Channell, Jr.                By: Gary W. Baker
                                        Its: C.F.O.
Docket No. FAA-2011-1318

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer

Connie

Arnold

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman

ATA Joe White
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) or


RULE
15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








I, Floyd
Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002:





(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
9, 2010




/s/
      Floyd WarkolFloyd
      WarkolChief
      Executive Officer
# "I'm making the world a safer place"

Breyonna B.**NRO engineer**

## The next generation of space leaders

The NRO offers high-achieving undergraduate and graduate students the opportunity to gain real-world experience in positions related to their field of study. They work alongside professionals to support meaningful projects that directly contribute to the NRO’s mission.
See More Jobs

## Where do I fit in the NRO?

Become part of the exciting mission of ensuring our nation's security. Start exploring NRO career opportunities by familiarizing yourself with NRO's career fields.
Explore career fields

## The Possibilities are Endless

For more than 60 years, the NRO has leveraged innovation and strategic partnerships to develop, acquire, launch, and operate America's spy satellites.
More on the Mission

National Reconnaissance Office
Launch your CareerDo Business With Us- Home
- About
- Careers
- Launches
- Work With Us
- News & Media
- Resources

- facebook
- twitter
- youtube
- instagram
- linkedin

Contact Us

National Reconnaissance Office

                                    - facebook
                                    - twitter
                                    - youtube
                                    - instagram
                                    - linkedin
Contact Us

Who We Are                                    - Mission Partners & Customers
                                    - Our Leadership
                                    - A Declassified History

Careers                                    - Working at the NRO
                                    - Career Fields
                                    - Job Listings
                                    - Student Opportunities

Launches                                    - Missions
                                    - Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us                                    - How To Do Business With Us
                                    - Director's Innovation Initiative
                                    - Acquisition Research Center

News & Media                                    - Featured Stories
                                    - Press Releases
                                    - Podcasts
                                    - Speeches and Testimony

Resources                                    - NRO Multimedia
                                    - Request a Speaker
                                    National Reconnaissance Office - Above and Beyond
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Georges Benarroch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Osprey Gold Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 15, 2006


                                        By: /s/ Georges Benarroch
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Georges Benarroch
                                            Acting President & Chief Executive
                                            Officer And Acting Chief Financial
                                            Officer


                                       21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              3,986
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      17,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                          167
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   25,812
<PP&E>                                              1,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     30,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              19,501
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               54
<OTHER-SE>                                         10,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       30,444
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   31,287
<CGS>                                              26,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      30,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                          540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   667
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          667
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.12


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            BANK ONE, ARIZONA, N.A.
                         ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                       BANC ONE AUTO GRANTOR TRUST 1996-B



The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Bank One, Arizona, N.A., as
Servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to Section 3.10(a) of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 1996 (the "Agreement") between the
Servicer, Banc One ABS Corporation, as Seller, and Bankers Trust Company, as
Trustee, does hereby certify on behalf of the Servicer as follows:

        (1)  Bank One, Arizona, N.A., is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer
             under the Agreement.

        (2)  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
             meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

        (3)  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
             January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999 (the "Applicable Period") and
             of its performance under the Agreement has been made by me or under
             my supervision.

        (4)  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
             knowledge, fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
             throughout the Applicable period and no default in the fulfillment
             of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
             forth in paragraph 5 below.

        (5)  The following is a description of each default in the performance
             of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement
             known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the year ended
             December 31, 1999: NONE.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this
Certificate as of the 31st day of December 1999.


                              BANK ONE, ARIZONA, N.A., as Servicer



                              By:   /s/Tracie H. Klein
                                  ----------------------------
                                  Name:  Tracie H. Klein
                                  Title: Vice President
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

A.   DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<Caption>
                                                            Jurisdiction of
          Name                                              Incorporation
<S>       <C>                                               <C>
(1)       Simmons International Holding Company, Inc.       New York
(2)       Gallery Corp.                                     Delaware
(3)       The Simmons Manufacturing Co., LLC                Delaware
(4)       Simmons Contract Sales, LLC                       Delaware
(5)       World of Sleep Outlets, LLC                       Delaware
(6)       Columbia Bedding & Feather Co., LLC               Delaware
(7)       Dreamwell, Ltd.                                   Nevada
(8)       Simmons Capital Management, LLC                   Nevada
(9)       SC Holdings, Inc.                                 Delaware
(10)      Sleep Country USA, Inc.                           Delaware

</Table>

B.   FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<Caption>
                                                            Jurisdiction of
          Name                                              Incorporation
<S>       <C>                                               <C>
(1)       Simmons Caribbean Bedding, Inc.                   Puerto Rico
(2)       INFO Establishment                                Liechtenstein
(3)       Simmons IP, Inc.                                  Ontario
(4)       688363 Ontario Limited                            Ontario
(5)       Simmons International Limited                     Bahamas

</Table>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM May 2016

Sediment Basin (350) Start

I.7 (-) Sedimentand waterborne 

contaminants

I.4 (-) Downslope 

deposition

Initial setting: On disturbed sites where 

conditions preclude treatment of 

sediment and sedimentation at the 

source

I.3 (-) Gully and 

streambank 

erosion

I.2 (-) 

Flooding

D.4 (+) Disturbed 

areas (construction), 

soil erosion

Critical Area Planting (342)

C.2 (+/-) Public/private health 

and safety, public/private

property protection

D.3 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

C.1 (+) Aquatic 

habitat

I.8 (-) Cost of 

offsite sediment 

removal

I.11 (-) Cost of 

future regulatory 

compliance

I.10 (+/-) Net return

C.3 (+/-) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and

communities)

D.2 (+) Trapped 

sediment

1. Earthen embankment with outlet

I.1 (-) Peak 

discharge

D.1 (+) Water 

impoundment

I.5 (-) Delivery of 

sediment and 

contaminants to 

surface waters and 

down-slope areas

I.9 (+) Downstream 

reservoir capacity

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

I.6 (+) Water quality

Pathway

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

I.12 (+) Growth of 

desirable vegetation

I.13 (+) Soil stabilized
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135519 & (63)(64)(65) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135519 

 COA: 269887 

St. Joseph CC: 05-013020-FH

WARREN EDWARD ENGLISH, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment and order of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to reinstate bond is 

DENIED. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for 

reconsideration under the appropriate standard, as explained in the partially dissenting 

opinion in the Court of Appeals, of whether the juror was excusable for cause. 

p0130 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 6, 2008 

 Clerk
Order entered September 22, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00215

- CR

BRIAN MARTIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Ca use No. 31995CC



### O RDER

T he Court GRANTS appellant’s September 18, 2014 motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0 8 1 2 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 23 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **Section
1350 Certifications**
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Husker Ag, LLC (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: March 29,
      2005****By:
    /s/ Fredrick J.
    KnievelFredrick J. Knievel, Chairman of
      the Board,President and Director*(Principal Executive
      Officer)*
 ****By:
    /s/ Robert E.
    BrummelsRobert E. Brummels, Treasurer and
      Director*(Principal Financial Officer)*
# C_2005049EN.01001001.xml

| 25.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3705 — KKR/Masonite)

(2005/C 49/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3705. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3705. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---