alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A Federal Advisory Committee for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Rese arch and Development 44th EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FACE-TO-FACE MEETING

DRAFT AGENDA July 12 - 13, 2010

Office of Research and Development

National Health and Environmental Effects Laborator y

Western Ecology Division

200 SW 35 th

Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333

Please Note That Times Listed are Pacific Time

Monday, July 12, 2010

8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. Registration

9:00 a.m. – 9:20 a.m. Welcome and Introductions D r. Gary S. Sayler, Chair, - Review of April Executive Committee Meeting Minutes - Overview of Agenda

9:20 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. BOSC DFO Remarks Mr. Greg S usanke, Designated - Administrative Issues Federal Officer (DFO), O ffice of Research and Development (ORD)

9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. ORD Remarks and Dr. Paul Anastas, Assistant

Welcome New BOSC Members Administrator for ORD

9:45 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Overview of ORD Chemical Dr. Elaine Francis, Research Realignment: Safe National Program Director,

Products for a Sustainable World Safe Pesticid es/Safe Products Research Program, ORD

10:00 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Mid-Cycle Progress Report Dr. Elaine Francis, - Safe Pesticides/Safe Products National Progr am Director, Research Program ORD



### 10 :45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Break

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Mid-Cycle Progress Report Ms. Becki Clark, - Human Health Risk Assessment Acting Director, National Research Program Center for Environmenta l
Assessment, ORDAgenda for July 12 - 13, 2010 Executive Committee Meeting



### 2 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Lunch

1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Ecosystem Informatics Sessio n - Overview Dr. Julia Jones, Director Ecosystem Informatics Program Oregon State University

- Computer Science Approaches Dr. Tom Dietterich, OSU to Species Modeling

- Mathematics of Ecological Dr. Ed Waymire, OSU, and 

### Dispersion Dr. Enrique Thomann, OSU

- Questions and Discussion

3 :00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Lab Tour: Western Ecology Div ision,

National Health and Environmental Research Laboratory, ORD

5:00 p.m. Recess

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

8:30 a.m. – 9:15 a.m. 

### ORD Response to BOSC Human Dr. Sally Perrault Darn ey, Health Report National Program Director for Human Health, ORD

9:15 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. ORD Update Dr. Kevin Tei chman, Deputy

Assistant Administrator for Science, ORD

Mr. Lek Kadeli, Deputy

Assistant Administrator for Management, ORD

10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. BOSC and SAB Liaison Upd ate Dr. Gary Sayler

10:15 a.m. – 10:30 p.m. Public Comment

10:30 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. BreakAgenda for July 12 - 13, 2010 Executive Committee Meeting



### 3 10:45 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. BOSC Decision Analysis Wor kgroup 

### Dr. Katherine von Stackelberg,

- 

### Review of ORD Nanomaterial Workgroup Chair, Executive 

### Case Study Workshop: Committee



### Methods and Procedures to Identify and Prioritize Research Dr. Mike Da vis, Needs Senior Science Advisor,

National Center for Environmental Assessment,

ORD

12:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Future Business /Open Forum Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair, - Next EC Meeting Executive Committee

- Future Work - Questions/Discussion

1:00 p.m. Adjourn
# C_2005073EN.01001101.xml

| 23.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3658 — Orkla/Chips)

(2005/C 73/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3658. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3658. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) (9/2020) Standard Document(69.39 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) Overview(746.05 KB)

Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) CPPE(25.26 KB)

Row Arrangement (Ac.) (557) Network Effects Diagram(82.71 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K
      for
      the period ending July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. VP of Finance &
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





By
      /s/
      Antonio Estrada Jr.


Antonio
      Estrada Jr.


Sr.
      VP of
      Finance & Corporate Controller and


Principal
      Financial Officer


October
      29, 2008
EXHIBIT 4.16

                              SNH CAPITAL TRUST III

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


         THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:

         FIRST:  The undersigned  trustees hereby form a business trust pursuant
to the laws of the State of Maryland.

         SECOND: The name of the business trust (the "Trust") is:


                              SNH Capital Trust III

         THIRD:  The  address of the  Trust's  principal  office in the State of
Maryland is c/o Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, 300 East Lombard Street,
Baltimore, Maryland 21202, Attention: James J. Hanks, Jr.

         FOURTH: The name and business address of the Trust's resident agent are
James J. Hanks,  Jr.,  c/o Ballard  Spahr  Andrews &  Ingersoll,  LLP,  300 East
Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

         The undersigned, being all of the trustees of the Trust, acknowledge
under the penalties of perjury, that to the best of their knowledge and belief,
the facts stated herein are true.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned trustees have signed this
Certificate of Trust this 4th day of May, 2001.



                                            /s/ Gerard M. Martin
                                            Gerard M. Martin


                                            /s/ Barry M. Portnoy
                                            Barry M. Portnoy
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 6, 2015, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a 
International Sematech (``SEMATECH'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Dianippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd., 
Sunnyvale, CA; Soitec, San Diego, CA; Applied Materials, Santa Clara, 
CA; Freescale Semiconductor, Austin, TX; and Winbond, San Jose, CA, 
have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 30, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 26, 2014 (79 FR 70555).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-02735 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# C_2005057EN.01001403.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Rechtbank Eerste Aanleg te Gent by decision of that court of 15 December 2004 in the case of Kerckhaert-Morres v Belgische Staat

(Case C-513/04)

(2005/C 57/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Rechtbank Eerste Aanleg te Gent (Court of first instance, Ghent) – Sixth Chamber (Netherlands) of 1 December 2004 received at the Court Registry on 15 December 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Kerckhaert-Morres and Belgische Staat, on the following question:

Is Article 56(1) of the EC Treaty (at the material time: Article 73b(1) of the EC Treaty) to be interpreted as precluding a restriction resulting from a provision in the income tax legislation of a Member State (in this case, Belgium) by which both dividends from shares in a company established in that State and dividends from shares in companies not established in that State are subject, in the hands of the share owner, to a uniform rate but where, in regard to share dividends from companies that are not established in that Member State, no deduction of taxation at source levied in that other Member State is allowed?

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT


         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 12, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and George G. Guthrie, an
individual (the "LENDER").


                                R E C I T A L S:


         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and the Lender executed a Loan
and Pledge Agreement dated as of January 17, 2001 in the amount of One Hundred
Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT");

         WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the Company and the Lender executed that
certain First Amendment to Loan and Pledge Agreement to clarify certain
provisions; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to further amend and modify
the Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Promissory
Note (the "NOTE") and, to reflect the new maturity date of the Note, the Company
and the Lender agree to cross out the old maturity date, February 14, 2001, from
the fifth paragraph on the first page of the Note, to write in the new maturity
date of April 12, 2001 beside the crossed-out old maturity date, and to sign the
Note by the new maturity date to evidence the agreement of the parties in
amending the maturity date of the Note;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Amendment to the Loan Agreement. Section 1.3 of the Loan
Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:

                  "1.3 Repayment. The outstanding principal and interest is
         payable no later than April 12, 2001 at which time all of the
         outstanding and unpaid principal and interest shall be due and payable
         (the "MATURITY DATE"). All payments of principal and interest shall be
         made in U.S. Dollars."

         2.       Non-Modification. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and shall remain unmodified and enforceable.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
effective as of the date first above written.

                           WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.,
                              as Borrower

                           By:    /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                ---------------------------------------
                                Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer


                                  /s/ George G. Guthrie
                                ---------------------------------------
                                George G. Guthrie, as Lender
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,919
<PP&E>                                          25,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,644
<SALES>                                        247,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,096
<CGS>                                          135,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,897
[OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES]                       7,379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,251
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.29
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004201EN.01002402.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/24

---

Action brought on 1 June 2004 by Andreas Mausolf against Europol

(Case T-210/04)

(2004/C 201/48)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against Europol was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 June 2004 by Andreas Mausolf, represented by M.F. Baltussen and P. de Casparis.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the rejection by Europol of 1 March 2004 of the applicant's complaint against the decision of 2 January 2003 and, at the same time, annul the contested decision of 2 January 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the rejection by Europol of 1 March 2004 of the applicant's complaint against the decision of 2 January 2003 and, at the same time, annul the contested decision of 2 January 2003;

| — | order Europol to grant the applicant another additional salary increment with effect from 1 July 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to grant the applicant another additional salary increment with effect from 1 July 2002;

| — | order Europol to pay that increment to the applicant within 48 hours of delivery of the judgment to be given in this case, together with the interest due thereon at the statutory rate prescribed by Netherlands law; |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay that increment to the applicant within 48 hours of delivery of the judgment to be given in this case, together with the interest due thereon at the statutory rate prescribed by Netherlands law;

| — | order Europol to reimburse the applicant for the costs incurred by him in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to reimburse the applicant for the costs incurred by him in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of his application, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 29 of the Europol Staff Regulations, submits that Europol exceeded the limits of its discretion and alleges infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

---
#### Quinn, Respondent, vs. Haas and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Doar & Knowles*of- New Richmond.

For the respondent: *Tom L. Yates*of Amery.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 19, 2015 518407

________________________________ BERNABE ENCARNACION, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 15, 2015 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Bernabe Encarnacion, Attica, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Collins, J.), entered January 29, 2014, which denied claimant's application pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for permission to file a late claim. Claimant, an inmate, filed a claim seeking reimbursement for the value of certain personal property missing from his cell following a cell search. He served the claim on defendant by regular mail on July 29, 2013, and the 120-day period for filing a valid claim expired on August 7, 2013 (see Court of Claims Act § 10 [9]). Defendant served an answer raising as an affirmative defense the lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction based upon claimant's failure to serve the claim by certified mail, return receipt requested as required by Court of Claims Act § 11 (a) (i). Thereafter, claimant made a pro se application-2- 518407

for permission to file a late claim. The Court of Claims denied claimant's application and he now appeals. We affirm. The provisions of Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) that vest the Court of Claims with discretionary authority to permit the filing of a late claim do not apply to inmate property claims (see Roberts v State of New York, 11 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2004]). Given that the claim here involves the loss of claimant's property following a cell search, his application for permission to file a late claim was properly denied. Significantly, claimant's failure to comply with the provisions of Court of Claims Act § 11 (a) (i) requiring that the claim be served upon the Attorney General either personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested, is jurisdictional in nature (see Brown v State of New York, 114 AD3d 632, 632 [2014]; Zoeckler v State of New York, 109 AD3d 1133, 1133 [2013]). In view of this, and given that defendant raised it as an affirmative defense, the claim must be dismissed (see Zoeckler v State of New York, 109 AD3d at 1133). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Garry, J.P., Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs, and claim dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court