alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005006EN.01001902.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-116/04 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/17/EC - Reorganisation and winding up of insurance undertakings - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 6/37)

Language of the case: Swedish

In Case C-116/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and K. Simonsson) v Kingdom of Sweden (Agent: A. Kruse) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 4 March 2004 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting for the President of the Fourth Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Gellhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
# C_2005019EN.01003401.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/34

---

(2005/C 19/70)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

Past publications

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

OJ C 262, 23.10.2004

OJ C 251, 9.10.2004

OJ C 239, 25.9.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
Order entered July 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-01423-CV

CITIBANK(SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellant

V.

MICHAEL AND THANH TRAN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-14313-D

ORDER

Before the Court is Appellees’ July 3, 2013 motion for extension of time in which to file 

a motion for rehearing in this case. The motion is GRANTED. Appellees’ motion is due on or 

before July 22, 2013.

/ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-95007) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, 1999 Employees Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Non-Employees
Directors' Stock Option Plan of Caliper Technologies Corp. of our report dated
January 25, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Caliper
Technologies Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 21, 2000
Exhibit 32.1











Certification of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) hereby certifies, to such
officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.








Date: November 12, 2009
/s/ Steven B. TangerSteven B. Tanger
President and Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the Registrant
CONFIDENTIAL	&	PROPRIETARY	

INFORMATION

MUST	NOT	BE	SHARED	WITH	THE	PUBLIC
#### Timothy Lincoln, Plaintiff, v Crystal Apartments Group, L.P., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, and Ronald D. Heath et al., Appellants. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Also Known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents-Appellants, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

[771 *356NYS2d 901]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants and defendant third-party plaintiff appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated November 14, 2002, as denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment on the cause of action for a declaration that the third-party defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, also known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, is obligated to defend and indemnify the third-party plaintiff in the main action, and denied that branch of their cross motion which was to stay prosecution of the main action pending the outcome of the third-party action, and the third-party defendants St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, also known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and F & L Claims Service, Inc., cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the third-party complaint. Application by F & L Claims Service, Inc., to withdraw its cross appeal as academic in light of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 28, 2003.

Ordered that the application is granted, and the cross appeal by F & L Claims Service, Inc., is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion of the third-party defendants St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, also known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and F & L Claims Service, Inc., which was to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against the third-party defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, also known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court should have dismissed the second and third causes of action sounding in fraud and alleging bad faith, respectively, insofar as asserted against the third-party defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, also known as St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, for failure to state causes of action *(see*CPLR 3016; *see New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 316 [1995]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Operator Licensing Examiner Standards for Research and Test Reactors (NUREG-1478, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Purpose and Format

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1478, Revision 2 (PDF - 7.37 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2007**Date Published:**June 2007

Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Purpose and Format

The research and test reactor operator licensing (RTROL) examiner standards establish the procedures and practices for administering initial and requalification written examinations and operating tests to license applicants and operators pursuant to Title 10, Part 55, “Operators Licenses,” of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 55).

These standards describe the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended and the regulations of 10 CFR Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,” and 10 CFR Part 55 on which the program is based. These standards also provide for equitable and consistent administration of examinations to all applicants and licensed operators at research and test reactor facilities.

Each standard describes procedures and practices for a particular aspect of the Research and Test Reactor Operator Licensing Program. Each standard is assigned a three-digit number, and related standards are grouped together for ease of reference. All the standards beginning with the same digit apply to related aspects of the program as follows:
> 
(1) general (2) preexamination activities (3) operating tests (4) written examinations (5) postexamination activities (6) requalification examinations (7) senior reactor operator limited to fuel handling (LSRO) licenses

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2217 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2217

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2017

  Mr. Polis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solar Expansion of Distributed 
Generation Exponentially Act'' or the ``Solar EDGE Act''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 25D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(9) Two-year increase for certain solar property 
        expenditures.--In the case of qualified solar electric property 
        expenditures for taxable years beginning during 2018 or 2019 
        with respect to property which has a nameplate capacity of less 
        than 20 kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent), subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be applied by substituting `50 percent' for `the 
        applicable percentage'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

SEC. 3. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 48 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Two-year increase for certain solar property.--In the 
        case of property--
                    ``(A) described in subsection (a)(3)(A)(i),
                    ``(B) the construction of which begins during 2018 
                or 2019, and
                    ``(C) which has a nameplate capacity of less than 
                20 kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent),
        the energy percentage shall be 50 percent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property construction of which begins after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of SRI / Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI Surgical), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI Surgical.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Mark R. Faris
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Mark R. Faris                             
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2278 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailing Radiation Control 

Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2017 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailing 

Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal 

site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Disposal 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailing 

8 Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2278 IH

1 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2023’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘September 30, 2048’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Aetna Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-07169, No. 333-08427, No. 333-08429, No. 333-08431, No. 333-68881, No.
333-52321, No. 333-52321-01, No. 333-52321-02, No. 333-52321-03, No.
333-52321-04 and No. 333-52321-05) filed by Aetna Inc. or its Subsidiaries of
our reports dated February 3, 1999, February 22, 1999 as to Note 23 and February
7, 2000 as to Note 2, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Aetna Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which
reports appear in or are incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K/A of Aetna Inc.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
February 15, 2000
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2137 

To direct the President to treat a harmful algal bloom caused by certain 

activities of the Federal Government as an emergency for purposes of 

the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the President to treat a harmful algal bloom caused 

by certain activities of the Federal Government as an 

emergency for purposes of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Do No Harm 

5 Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2137 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR HARMFUL ALGAL 

2 BLOOMS CAUSED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 

3 WATER TRANSFERS. 

4 (a) TREATMENT AS EMERGENCY.—Notwithstanding 

5 section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

6 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191), the Presi7 dent shall treat the impacts to State waterways and coast8 al estuaries of a harmful algal bloom conveyed down9 stream as a result of a water transfer carried out by the 

10 Corps of Engineers within such State as an emergency 

11 for purposes of title V of such Act. 

12 (b) EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE.—The President, in 

13 consultation with the affected State, shall exercise any au14 thority under section 502 or 503 of the Robert T. Stafford 

15 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 5192, 5193) that the President determines is necessary 

17 to address an emergency described in subsection (a), in18 cluding exercising debris-removal authority under section 

19 502(a)(5) of such Act to remove toxic algal biomass and 

20 muck. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Nehls, Respondent, vs. Russell, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Russell & Goets*of Hartford.

For the respondent: *Harry U. Amidon*of Hartfor'd and *Eugene A. Clifford*of Juneau.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2378

MARGIE J. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-3240-1-6-BD)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Margie J. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Laura H. Walter, GLASS,

MCCULLOUGH, SHERRILL & HARROLD, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

In this employment discrimination action, Appellant appeals

from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants. In her

appeal, Appellant raises certain claims that were not preserved in

her objections to the magistrate judge’s report. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985) (failure to object waives appellate review); see also Howard v. Secretary of HHS, 932 F.2d 505, 508-09

(6th Cir. 1991) (failure to file specific objections, as opposed to

general and conclusory ones, waives appeal). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on all grounds other than that the district court

erred in looking at company-wide treatment of employees, rather

than treatment of employees under the supervision of Appellant’s

supervisor, in determining that Appellant had failed to present a

prima facie case of discrimination. On this issue, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Westinghouse Savannah

River Co., No. CA-95-3240-1-6-BD (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned directors and officers of Aetna Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
severally constitute and appoint Thomas J. Calvocoressi and Robert J. Price, and
each of them individually, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to
them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names and in the capacities
indicated below, the Company's 1997 Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may
be signed by our said attorneys to the Form 10-K and to any and all amendments
thereto.

Dated as of March 2, 1998.


/s/ Richard L. Huber                      /s/ Gerald Greenwald
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Richard L. Huber                          Gerald Greenwald
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,        Director
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)


/s/ Leonard Abramson                      /s/ Ellen M. Hancock
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Leonard Abramson                          Ellen M. Hancock
Director                                  Director


/s/ Betsy Z. Cohen                        /s/ Michael H. Jordan
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Betsy Z. Cohen                            Michael H. Jordan
Director                                  Director


/s/ William H. Donaldson                  /s/ Jack D. Kuehler
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
William H. Donaldson                      Jack D. Kuehler
Director                                  Director


/s/ Barbara Hackman Franklin              /s/ Frank R. O'Keefe, Jr.
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Barbara Hackman Franklin                  Frank R. O'Keefe, Jr.
Director                                  Director


/s/ Jerome S. Goodman                     /s/ Judith Rodin
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
Jerome S. Goodman                         Judith Rodin
Director                                  Director


/s/ Earl G. Graves
-------------------------------------     
Earl G. Graves
Director