alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NEMS is a model of U.S. energy economy developed and maintained by the

US Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE).

NEMS is used to produce the Annual Energy Outlook, a reference publication

that provides detailed forecasts of the energy economy from the current

year to 2040. DOE first developed NEMS in the 1980s, and the model has

undergone frequent updates and expansion since. DOE uses the modeling

system extensively to produce issue reports, legislative analyses, and

respond to Congressional inquiries.

US EPA docketed two 2014 National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) files

that EPA modified in order to use NEMS to estimate the national energy system

impacts of the Proposed New Source Performance Standards.

These codes are part of the larger set of source codes and input files that constitute NEMS.

Interested parties should contact the US Energy Information for more information

on NEMS or obtaining the complete source code.

The files are:

1. wllow48_docket.txt (input file for the Oil and Gas Supply Module)

2. ngitm_docket.f (part of the Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module)

For more detail, the reader should consult Section 7 of the Regulatory Impact

Analysis which is also available in the Docket.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 22

     The subsidiaries of American TeleSource International, Inc. are as follows:

          State or other Company                   Jurisdiction of Incorporation
          ----------------------                   -----------------------------
     American TeleSource International, Inc.                   Canada
     American TeleSource International, Inc.                   Texas
     American TeleSource International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
     GlobalSCAPE, Inc.                                         Delaware
     Sistema de Telefonia Computarizada, S.A. de C.V.
     ("Computel")                                              Mexico
     Servicios de Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. ("Sinfra")     Mexico
     TeleSpan, Inc. ("TeleSpan")                               Texas
     ATSI de CentroAmerica, S.A.                               Costa Rica
<PAGE>
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
Lawrence E. Jaro, Joel D. Aaseby and A. Richard Caputo, Jr., and each of them,
the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents of the undersigned, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name, place and stead
of the undersigned to sign any and all reports to be filed by AmeriKing, Inc.
pursuant to the Securities Exchange of Act of 1934 (including other documents in
connection therewith), with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby
grants to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-
fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney may be executed simultaneously in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and it shall not be
necessary in making proof of this Power of Attorney to produce or account for
more than one such counterpart.  This Power of Attorney shall expire upon the
performance of any other necessary, requisite or proper acts as referred to
herein, unless earlier exercised, revoked or extended by Company in writing.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
Signature                                               Title

<S>                                     <C>
 
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive
--------------------------------------  Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  Lawrence E. Jaro
 
                                        Vice Chairman
--------------------------------------
  William C. Osborn
 
                                        Director and Chief Operating Officer
--------------------------------------
  Gary W. Hubert
 
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
--------------------------------------  Secretary (Principal Financial
  Joel D. Aaseby                        Officer)
 
 
                                        Director and Vice President
--------------------------------------
  A. Richard Caputo, Jr.
 
                                        Director
  John W. Jordan II
 
                                        Director
--------------------------------------
  Thomas H. Quinn
 
                                        Director
--------------------------------------
  David  W. Zalaznick
</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2023

D.4 (+) Cost of materials, 

installation, and 

maintenance

Initial settings: A manure management system where a 

roofs and covers practice is placed over a waste 

management facility, agrichemical handling facility, or an 

on-farm secondary containment facility to:(1) capture, 

manage, and utilize biogas and reduce emissions of gasses 

to improve air quality; (2) exclude precipitation or divert 

clean water from potential contaminants; (3) improve waste 

management and utilization to protect surface water quality.

Start

D.1 (-) Methane 

released D.3 (-) Ammonia released

D.2 (-) Odors

C.3 (+) Income and income stability (individuals and community)

I.7 (+/-) Net return to 

producer

D.5 (+/-) Runoff outlet or 

conveyance 

I.11 (+) Water quality

C.2 (+) Air quality

Roofs and Covers (367) 

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice or 

activity

Associated practice

I.4 (+) Nitrogen 

available for plant 

growth I.9 (-) Waste storage 

volumes

I.10 (-) Chance of storage 

overflow

I.1 (-) 

Greenhouse 

gases

I.5 (+) 

Productivity

I.6 (+) Potential 

income

C.1 (+) Community 

health and well-being

Roof Runoff 

Structure (558) 

I.2 (+) 

Potential 

biogas 

production; 

onfarm 

energy 

source

I.3 (-) Cost of 

compliance 

with future 

regulation

I.8 (-) Need 

for 

commercial 

fertilizer

Waste Storage Facility (313)

Waste Treatment Lagoon (359)

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or 

a decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

I.12 (-) Soil 

erosion – 

gully erosion

Pathway

Agrichemical Handling Facility (309)

On-Farm Secondary Containment 

Facility (319)

Composting Facility (317)

2. Place roofs and covers over 

facility to exclude precipitation 

or divert clean water

1. Place roofs and covers 

over facility to capture and 

manage gasses

Anaerobic Digester (366)
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2017 

D.6 (-) Suspended

sediment, metals,

pathogens, salinity to 

surface water

Waste Treatment Lagoon (359)

D.5 (-)

Pesticides, 

nutrients, and

organics to 

surface water

I.4 (+) Dissolved

oxygen surface waters

C.4 (+) Aquatic

health for

humans and

domestic and

wild animals

I.5 (-) Noxious

algal growth

I.6 (+) Meeting water

quality standards

I.1 (+)

Agribusiness

C.1 (+) Income

stability (individuals 

and community)

C.3 (+) Stream fauna,

e.g., fish, invertebrates

2. Structure/site dedicated

Initial setting: AFO is

established and wants a

lagoon for treating wastes

D.2 (+) Manure

stored in lagoon

Waste Utilization (633)

Nutrient Management (590)

D.3 (+) Perceived

nuisance

C.2 (+) (-) Air Quality of the air

shed (depending on 

objectives/resource of concern)

C.5 (-)

Health/

habitat

suitability

for humans

I. 3 (+)

Lagoon

failure,

seepage

Start

Uncover

D.4 Air Quality

(+)Greenhouse

 gas

(+) Odor

(+) (-) Ammonia

(+) (-) HAP

(+) (-) Pathogens

Cover

Anaerobic

D.4 Air Quality

(-) Greenhouse

 gas

(-) Odor

(+) (-) Ammonia

(+) (-) HAP

(+) (-) Pathogens

1. Manure-transfer system

purchased/dedicated

D.1 (+) Infrastructure and

operational costs

I.2 (+) Meeting air quality standards

Aerobic

D.4 Air Quality

(-) Greenhouse

 gas

(-) Odor

(+) (-) Ammonia

(+) (-) HAP

(+) (-) Pathogens

LEGEND

#. Created by 

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Associated practice

Mitigating practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
**Exhibit23.1**

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 333-36097 and 333-109771 on Form S-8 of our reportdated April 2, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Channell Commercial Corporation and subsidiaries as ofand for the year ended December 31, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-BasedPayment,*effective January 1, 2006, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Channell Commercial Corporation and subsidiaries for the yearended December 31, 2006.
| */s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP* |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| San Diego, California           |
| April 2, 2007                   |

 

----
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM

To: Public Information (MS 5030)

Plans Section, Office of Field 

Operations (MS 5231)

Public Information copy of DOCD

Control # - S-07659

Type - Supplemental Development Operations Coordinations Document

Lease(s) - OCS-G25098 Block - 546 Mississippi Canyon Area

Operator - LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C.

Wells SS004 (G-1) and SS005 (G-2)

DP Semisubmersible and Semisubmersible

Attached is a copy of the subject plan for public comments on issues that 

should be addressed in an Environmental Assessment.

It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval.

Chiquita Hill

Plan Coordinator

G25098/MC/546

G25098/MC/546

6297 FNL, 7476 FWL

6140 FNL, 7477 FWL

G25098/MC/546

G25098/MC/546

WELL/SS004 G1

WELL/SS005 G2

Site Type/Name Botm Lse/Area/Blk Surface Location Surf Lse/Area/Blk

Description -

Rig Type -

Subject:

From:

May 2, 2014
# C_2005053EN.01001601.xml

| 3.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 March 2005

(2005/C 53/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3101 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6859 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0627 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5413 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,88 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5830 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,647 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 242,21 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4307 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9098 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 443 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,73 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,858 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6841 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6792 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6286 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2185 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8077 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1346 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 319,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7544 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3101

JPY

Japanese yen

137,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6859

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0627

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5413

ISK

Iceland króna

79,88

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5830

CZK

Czech koruna

29,647

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

242,21

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4307

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9098

ROL

Romanian leu

36 443

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,73

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,858

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6841

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6792

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6286

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2185

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8077

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1346

KRW

South Korean won

1 319,79

ZAR

South African rand

7,7544

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004193EN.01000101.xml

| 29.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 July 2004

(2004/C 193/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2034 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2105 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5360 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,42 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4605 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58100 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,653 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6541 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4248 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4096 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 096 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9600 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,135 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 792 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7266 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6076 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3863 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9247 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0772 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5751 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2034

JPY

Japanese yen

134,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4349

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66165

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2105

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5360

ISK

Iceland króna

86,42

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4605

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58100

CZK

Czech koruna

31,653

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6541

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4248

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4096

ROL

Romanian leu

41 096

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9600

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,135

TRL

Turkish lira

1 792 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7266

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6076

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3863

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9247

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0772

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,79

ZAR

South African rand

7,5751

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004163EN.01000101.xml

| 22.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2004

(2004/C 163/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2112 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1453 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5085 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,77 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58170 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,878 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6539 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4249 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5847 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 731 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,3900 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,955 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 803 000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7526 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6538 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4463 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9266 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0837 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6962 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2112

JPY

Japanese yen

131,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1453

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5085

ISK

Iceland króna

87,77

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58170

CZK

Czech koruna

31,878

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6539

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4249

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5847

ROL

Romanian leu

40 731

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,3900

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,955

TRL

Turkish lira

1 803 000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7526

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6538

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4463

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9266

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0837

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,75

ZAR

South African rand

7,6962

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Drone!UAS Practice Group

# ANTONELLI


# -- LAW--

U.S . Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave S .E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Re : FAA-20 15-8032-0001 35 East Wacker Drive Suite 1875 Chicago, IL 60601 Tel. 312.201.8310 Jeffrey@Antonelli-Law.com December 21 , 2015
Petition filed by Will Cooper on behalfof "Antonelli Law" and "Richter Studios " Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised despite petitioner Will Cooper filing a Section 333 Exemption under the name Antonelli Law on behalf ofRichter Studios, petitioner has in fact NO relation to neither my firm Antonelli Law, nor our client, Richter Brothers Studios, Inc., d/b/a Richter Studios. No part of the petition should be considered drafted or endorsed by Antonelli Law or Richter Studios. In order to avoid any confusion and potential liability issues with our client, Richter Studios, who received Exemption No . 12422 to conduct aerial cinematography operations, we request that the FAA deny this petition and require Mr. Cooper to submit a new petition to obtain a new Docket ID number. We request this because the docket itself lists Richter Studios as the petitioner. Additionally, our client, Richter Studios, is listed on many pages of Mr. Cooper' s petition requestincluding on the first page of the petition - which could create confusion and potentially harm our client should Mr. Cooper' s petition be approved as it was submitted .
Attorney for Richter Brother Studios Inc., 

# d iiJ



# u
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         February 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 107 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-26, CP2015-35.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-02355 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Frank Ventura et al., Respondents, v Lancet Arch, Inc., Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 683]

*1054Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered July 28, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in part and dismissing the claim under 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (e) and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) to recover damages for injuries sustained by Frank Ventura (plaintiff) while employed as a labor foreman on a construction and restoration project. Plaintiff slipped and fell on wet mortar that had accumulated on a sheet of plywood used as a platform for a mortar mixer. Plaintiff alleged that his injuries were caused by a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d) (slipping hazards) and (e) (tripping and other hazards). Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim under subdivision (e). Plaintiff testified at his deposition that he slipped on the wet mortar as he attempted to move the mixer, and thus he may not contend that he tripped due to a violation of subdivision (e) (see *Bale v Pyron Corp.,*256 AD2d 1128, 1128-1129 [1998]; *see also Motyka v Ogden Martin Sys. of Onondaga,*272 AD2d 980, 981 [2000]).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion, however, insofar as it sought dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim under subdivision (d) of section 23-1.7. The plywood on which the mixer was situated constituted a “platform” under subdivision (d), and we further conclude that the fact that the spilled wet mortar was generated by the work being performed does not compel the conclusion that it is not a “foreign substance which may cause slippery footing” *(id.).*Whether the failure to remove or otherwise treat the wet mortar in order to provide safe footing constitutes negligence presents an issue of fact for trial *(see*id.; *Hammond v International Paper Co.,*161 AD2d 914, 915 [1990]). We therefore modify the order by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and dismissing plaintiffs’ claim under subdivision (e). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.