alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<S>                                       <C>
<ARTICLE>                                   5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               403,187
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        521,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (5,308)
<INVENTORY>                                          219,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,213,628
<PP&E>                                             1,061,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (794,087)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,482,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                635,220
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              18,286
<OTHER-SE>                                           817,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,482,468
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,917,295
<CGS>                                              1,335,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        840,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        3032
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      409,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                           4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  405,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         405,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>                                           5           
        
 <S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS 
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998 
 <PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1998 
 <PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1998 
 <CASH>                                                  503,126 
 <SECURITIES>                                                  0 
 <RECEIVABLES>                                         2,483,588 
 <ALLOWANCES>                                            488,793 
 <INVENTORY>                                                   0 
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,573,946 
 <PP&E>                                                3,203,903 
 <DEPRECIATION>                                          765,049 
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       39,778,986 
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6,155,358 
 <BONDS>                                              14,266,493 
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0 
 <PREFERRED>                                                  10 
 <COMMON>                                                 12,203 
 <OTHER-SE>                                           17,171,874 
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         39,778,986 
 <SALES>                                               4,149,185 
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     15,165,755 
 <CGS>                                                 4,161,520 
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                         6,164,220 
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      4,808,585 
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                        511,333 
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,312,703 
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,188,342)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                  0 
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,188,342)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                0 
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0 
 <CHANGES>                                                     0 
 <NET-INCOME>                                         (2,188,342)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.28)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0 

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Vincent K. Roach, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent K. Roach                 
|Vincent K. Roach                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|August 11, 2004
----

Action brought on 8 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

(Case C-507/04)

(2005/C 45/30)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Michael Van Beek and Bernhard Schima, acting as Agents, assisted by Matthias Lang, Rechtsanwalt, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action the Commission takes issue with the defective transposition in Austrian law of Directive 79/409/EEC by way of the relevant legal provisions of the Länder of Burgenland, Carinthia, Lower Austria, Upper Austria, Salzburg, Styria, Tyrol, Vorarlberg and Vienna which were notified to the Commission or which the Commission understands to have been adopted.

In the view of the Commission, the following were not fully and/or not correctly implemented for the territory of individual federal Länder: the provisions concerning the scope of Directive 79/409 (Article 1(1) and (2) of the Directive); the general rules governing the protection of bird species (Article 5 of the Directive); the ban on trade (Article 6(1) of the Directive); the provisions governing hunting of the species listed in Annex II (Article 7(1) of the Directive); the rules governing the preservation of populations (Article 7(4) of the Directive); the rules governing prohibited methods and equipment for hunting and capturing wild birds (Article 8 of the Directive); the criteria governing derogations from Articles 5 to 8 (Article 9(1) and (2) of the Directive); and the provisions on the introduction of wild bird species (Article 11 of the Directive).

----

(1)  OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1.

----
#### Kelly, Respondent, vs. Byram and others as Receivers, Appellants.

For the appellants: *H. J. Killilea*and *Rodger M. Trump*of Milwaukee and *Bogue & Sanderson*of Portage.

For the respondent: *Grady, Farnsworth & Walker*of Portage.

*By the Court.*

Order and judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Philip
McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
Communications, Inc.





Date:
      May 12, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Philip M. McDermottName:
                Philip
      M. McDermottTitle:
                Chief
      Financial
Officer
# C_2004228EN.01004402.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/44

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-310/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 228/102)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 11 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-310/99, Strijbos en zoon B.V., supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 63 of 4.3.2000.

1

---
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARGARITA CARDENAS DE CASTANEDA; FRANCISCO CASTANEDA CARDENAS; HUBER CASTANEDA CARDENAS; REYNA CASTANEDA CARDENAS, Petitioners,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-73072 Agency Nos. A095-194-893 A095-447-210 A095-449-448 A095-449-449

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 11, 2011 Pasadena, California Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Margarita Cardenas de Castaneda and th ree of her children, all natives and 

# FILED

JUL 13 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALScitizens of Mexico, petition for review of a BIA decision denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition. Petitioners failed to exhaust their so le claim, ineffective assistance of counsel, by raising that issue before the BIA in a motion to reopen. As a prudential matter, when such claims relate to a ttorney conduct that occurred prior to and during the removal proceedings, as they do here, “the BIA [is] the appropriate body to first pass on the claims in order to generate a proper record for review.” Puga v. Chertoff , 488 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir. 2007). Though petitioners may not have realized they had such a claim until their new counsel was appointed, the period to file a motion to reopen may be equitably tolled during periods where petitioners are receiving ineffective assistance of counsel. Iturribarria v. INS , 321 F.3d 889, 898 (9th Cir. 2003). We therefore deny the petition. DENIED.
### {In Archive} Re: McElmo Title V and PSD Permit Shaheerah Kelly to: j ustin. j .harrison 07/27/2005 03:43 PM Cc: Gerardo Rios, Ann Lyons, christopher.w.armstrong, neil. j .ryan From: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US To: j ustin. j .harrison@exxonmobil.com, Cc: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Ann Lyons/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com, neil. j .ryan@exxonmobil.com Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive. Thanks for the follow-up. I'll be in contact with you very soon. Shaheerah Kelly Air Division, Permits Office U S EPA Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579 j ustin.j.harrison @ exxonmobil.com
j ustin.j .harrison@exxonmobil. com 07/27/2005 01:06 PM To Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

cc neil. j .ryan@exxonmobil.com, christopher.w.armstrong@exxonmobil.com Subject McElmo Title V and PSD Permit

Shaheerah, As a follow-up to our telephone conversations on April 26, June 9, and today, I just wanted to confirm some of the information we discussed: Per our Consent Decree, which went into effect on June 8, 2005, a Title V application and a PSD permit application must be submitted to your office within 180 days after the Effective Date (before 12/5/05). Per our Part 71 application dated March 22, 2000 and our follow-up letter (dated May 27, 2004) in response to your March 31, 2004 request, we feel that the Title V application has already been made. You will determine if there is any other information you need to complete the Title V Draft Permit and let us know in the next two weeks either in writing and/or through a phone call with a draft request. With respect to the PSD application, we have completed the modeling, are currently working on the BACT analysis, and are awaiting further instructions from your office in regards to the application itself in order to complete this requirement by 12/5/05. You will begin to involve the Navajo EPA in any conversations we have regarding the above items via a conference call. We appreciate the open dialogue we have established and wish to continue this in order to complete our requirements in a timely manner. If you haveany questions or if there is anything we can do to help in expediting thes e matters to closure, please let us know. Thank you for your input and diligence.
Justin J. Harrison ExxonMobil U.S. Production Regulatory Air Compliance CORP-MI-3038 P.O. Box 4358 Houston, TX 77210-4358 Office: 281-654-1127 Fax: 281-654-1147

"Nobody Gets Hurt"
# C_2004262EN.01003502.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/35

---

Action brought on 15 July 2004 by Dimitra Lantzoni against the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(Case T-289/04)

(2004/C 262/68)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Court of Justice of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 July 2004 by Dimitra Lantzoni, residing in Übersyren (Luxembourg), represented by Clara Marhuenda, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the defendant notified to the applicant on 7 October 2003 rejecting her complaint about the promotion points awarded to her in the 1999/2000 promotion procedure and in the 2001 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the defendant notified to the applicant on 7 October 2003 rejecting her complaint about the promotion points awarded to her in the 1999/2000 promotion procedure and in the 2001 promotion procedure;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

On 5 February 2002, the applicant, an official of the Court of Justice, was informed of the decision to award her no promotion points for the years 1999 and 2000. On 16 January 2003, the applicant was also informed that she had been awarded one promotion point in the 2001 promotion procedure. She complained about the latter decision and subsequently made another complaint, concerning the award of no points for the years 1999 and 2000. Her complaint was rejected as out of time for the years 1999 and 2000 and as unfounded as regards the year 2001.

In support of this action, the applicant submits that the contested award of points is in breach of the decision of the Court of 18 October 2000 introducing that system, on the ground that it was not made on the basis of her staff reports, as the points awarded were wholly inconsistent with those reports. As regards the rejection, on the ground that it was out of time, of her complaint about the award of no points for 1999 and 2000, the applicant submits that the delay of almost two years in communicating her staff report for 1999/2000 to her prevented her from being aware of the errors in the award of points for that promotions procedure. According to the applicant, the legal certainty of the promotion procedure concerned would not in any way be called into question if she were permitted to contest the failure to award her any points for those two years, given that the number of points obtained does not automatically guarantee a promotion.

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

RECEIVED 

JUL 2 1 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

VS. 

Docket No. FAA-2013-1086 

FAA Case No. 2011S0190181 

PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPT., 

Respondent. Judge Sullivan 

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY PLAN 

Pursuant to the Judge's May 16, 2014, Order, the parties hereby submits the following 

joint proposed scheduling/discovery plan: 

July 23, 2014: Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference 

August 29, 2014: Deadline for Initial Disclosures 

September 30,2014: Deadline for Issuance oflnitial Written Discovery Requests 

November 3 through December 5, 2014: Depositions (if needed) 

December 12,2014: Deadline for Issuance of Supplemental Discovery Requests 

January 16,2015: Close of Discovery 

February 13, 2015: Dispositive Motion Deadline 

February 27, 2015: Deadline to Respond to Dispositive Motions 

March 13,2015: Deadline for Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions 

This schedule should permit a motion conference and appropriate time for pre-hearing 

submissions and pre-hearing brief before a hearing in or after May 2015. 

This scheduling plan has been discussed with Respondent's representative, Ms. Abdulrahrnan, 

and Respondent agrees to this proposal 

Respectfully submitted this / G~y of July, 2014, 

Christ pher R. Steve n 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Joint Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan has been 

sent this date by the following methods: 

original and one copy via certified mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile: 

Nazihra M. Abdulrahman Soler 

Office of Legal Affairs 

Puerto Rico Police Department 

P.O. Box 70166 

San Juan, PR 00936-8166 

fax: (787) 781-7993 

Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EI1-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

fax: (202) 366-2131 

Dated
# C_2004319EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 December 2004

(2004/C 319/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3384 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4351 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69905 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0245 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5436 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,59 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5788 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,563 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6895 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4329 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0908 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 37 946 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,73 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,750 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 860 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7442 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6478 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4143 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8735 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1940 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 410,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5985 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3384

JPY

Japanese yen

139,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4351

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69905

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0245

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5436

ISK

Iceland króna

83,59

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5788

CZK

Czech koruna

30,563

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6895

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4329

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0908

ROL

Romanian leu

37 946

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,73

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,750

TRL

Turkish lira

1 860 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7442

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6478

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4143

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8735

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1940

KRW

South Korean won

1 410,27

ZAR

South African rand

7,5985

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005031EN.01003001.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/30

---

(2005/C 31/56)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

Past publications

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

OJ C 262, 23.10.2004

OJ C 251, 9.10.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---