Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 6765 

proposed CPA lease sale area are 

currently unleased. The estimated 

amount of resources projected to be 

developed as a result of the proposed 

CPA lease sale is 0.460–0.894 billion 

barrels of oil (BBO) and 1.939–3.903 

trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas. 

Alternative B—Exclude the Unleased 

Blocks Near the Biologically Sensitive 

Topographic Features: This alternative 

would offer for lease all unleased blocks 

within the proposed CPA lease sale 

area, as described for the proposed 

action (Alternative A), but it would 

exclude from leasing any unleased 

blocks subject to the Topographic 

Features Stipulation. The estimated 

amount of resources projected to be 

developed under Alternative B is 0.460– 

0.894 BBO and 1.939–3.903 Tcf of gas. 

The number of blocks that would not be 

offered under Alternative B represents 

only a small percentage of the total 

number of blocks to be offered under 

Alternative A; therefore, it is estimated 

that the levels of activity for Alternative 

B would be essentially the same as those 

projected for a CPA proposed action. 

Alternative C—No Action: This 

alternative is the cancellation of 

proposed CPA Lease Sale 235 and is 

identified as the environmentally 

preferred alternative. 

After careful consideration, the 

Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals 

Management has selected the proposed 

action, identified as BOEM’s preferred 

alternative (Alternative A) in the CPA 

235, 241, and 247 Supplemental EIS. 

BOEM’s selection of the preferred 

alternative meets the purpose and need 

for the proposed action, as identified in 

the CPA 235, 241, and 247 

Supplemental EIS, and reflects an 

orderly resource development with 

appropriate protection of the human, 

marine, and coastal environments while 

also ensuring that the public receives an 

equitable return for these resources and 

that free-market competition is 

maintained. 

Record of Decision Availability: To 

obtain a single printed or CD copy of the 

ROD for proposed CPA Lease Sale 235, 

you may contact BOEM, Gulf of Mexico 

OCS Region, Public Information Office 

(GM 335A), 1201 Elmwood Park 

Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 

70123–2394 (1–800–200–GULF). An 

electronic copy of the ROD is available 

on BOEM’s Internet Web site at http:// 

www.boem.gov/nepaprocess/. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

more information on the ROD, you may 

contact Mr. Gary D. Goeke, Bureau of 

Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of 

Mexico OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood 

Park Boulevard (GM 623E), New 

Orleans, Louisiana 70123–2394. You 

may also contact Mr. Goeke by 

telephone at 504–736–3233. 

Authority: This NOA is published 

pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 

1503) implementing the provisions of the 

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 

1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Abigail Ross Hopper, 

Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02272 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

[RR03510000, XXXR0680A1, 

RX.20116000.0019400] 

Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement/

Environmental Impact Report for the 

Clean Water Factory Project, San 

Bernardino County, California 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation 

and the City of San Bernardino 

Municipal Water Department will 

prepare a joint Environmental Impact 

Statement/Environmental Impact Report 

(EIS/EIR) to evaluate the effects of the 

Clean Water Factory project. The 

proposed Clean Water Factory is a water 

reclamation project to treat and reuse 

municipal wastewater that is currently 

discharged to the Santa Ana River. The 

reclaimed water will be used for 

groundwater recharge and landscape 

irrigation. The purpose of the project is 

to reduce dependence on imported 

water and establish a reliable, 

sustainable source of clean water. The 

public and agencies are invited to 

comment on the scope of the EIS/EIR 

and the proposed alternatives. 

DATES: Submit written comments on the 

scope of the EIS/EIR on or before March 

9, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Please send written 

comments to Doug McPherson, 

Southern California Area Office, Bureau 

of Reclamation, 27708 Jefferson Avenue, 

Suite 202, Temecula, CA 92590; or 

email to dmcpherson@usbr.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doug McPherson, Southern California 

Area Office general telephone number 

951–695–5310; or email dmcpherson@

usbr.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice is provided pursuant to the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)), and 

Department of the Interior regulations 

for implementation of NEPA (43 CFR 

part 46). 

Background 

The San Bernardino Municipal Water 

Department (SBMWD) is preparing a 

feasibility study report for approval 

under the Reclamation Wastewater and 

Groundwater Study and Facilities Act of 

1992 (Title XVI of Pub. L. 102–575, as 

amended). If the Bureau of Reclamation 

determines that the feasibility study 

report meets the requirements defined at 

43 U.S.C. 390h–2, and Congress amends 

Title XVI to specifically authorize 

Federal appropriations for the project, it 

will be eligible for construction funding 

under the Title XVI program. 

The proposed project will install 

treatment improvements within the 

existing San Bernardino Water 

Reclamation Plant (SBWRP) to achieve 

product water quality approved for 

groundwater recharge by the California 

Department of Public Health and the 

Santa Ana Regional Water Quality 

Control Board. New pipelines will 

convey treated effluent to the existing 

Waterman Basins and East Twin Creek 

Spreading Grounds for recharge into the 

Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin. 

Recycled water will be delivered for 

non-potable irrigation uses along the 

pipeline alignment. The project may 

also include a pipeline to convey 

recycled water from the existing Rapid 

Infiltration and Extraction (RIX) facility 

to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency 

service area. 

SBWRP effluent is currently 

discharged to the Santa Ana River 

through the RIX facility, under National 

Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 

permit no. CA8000304. The Santa Ana 

River is designated critical habitat for 

the Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus 

santaanae), a fish species listed as 

threatened under the Endangered 

Species Act. The existing RIX discharge 

contributes to dry season baseflows that 

support the Santa Ana sucker. 

Pursuant to California Water Code 

section 1211, SBMWD filed Wastewater 

Change Petition WW0059 with the 

California State Water Resources 

Control Board to reduce recycled water 

discharge from the RIX facility to the 

Santa Ana River by up to 31,500 acrefeet per year. Reductions in RIX 

discharge will be phased over time 

through an Adaptive Management Plan 

to monitor and manage downstream 

flows, to comply with the requirements 

of the Endangered Species Act. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6766 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Scoping Process 

SBMWD filed a Notice of Preparation 

(California State Clearinghouse no. 

2014111012) on November 6, 2014, 

pursuant to the California 

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 

(P.R.C. section 21092, C.C.R. section 

15082) and held two public scoping 

meetings on November 19, 2014. To 

avoid duplication with State and local 

procedures, we plan to use the scoping 

process initiated by SBMWD under 

CEQA. No additional public scoping 

meetings are planned at this time. The 

CEQA Notice of Preparation is available 

at http://www.usbr.gov/lc/socal/

envdocs.html. 

No known Indian trust assets or 

environmental justice issues are 

associated with the proposed action, 

although the pipeline alignments may 

include areas of low income and 

minority populations. 

Written comments are requested to 

help identify alternatives and issues that 

should be analyzed in the EIS/EIR. 

Federal, State and local agencies, tribes, 

and the general public are invited to 

participate in the environmental review 

process. 

Public Disclosure 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: January 27, 2015. 

Terrance J. Fulp, 

Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01942 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4332–90–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1020 (Second 

Review)] 

Barium Carbonate From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on barium 

carbonate from China would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on February 3, 2014 (79 FR 6219) 

and determined on May 9, 2014 that it 

would conduct a full review (79 FR 

29454, May 22, 2014). Notice of the 

scheduling of the Commission’s review 

and of a public hearing to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register on August 1, 2014 (79 

FR 44864). The hearing was cancelled at 

the request of the domestic interested 

party. 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determination in this review on 

February 2, 2015. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4518 (February 2015), 

entitled Barium Carbonate from China: 

Investigation No. 731–TA–1020 (Second 

Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 2, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02341 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1117–0024] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection, 

eComments Requested; Extension 

Without Change of a Previously 

Approved Collection Reports of 

Regulated Transactions Involving 

Extraordinary Quantities, Uncommon 

Methods of Payment, and Unusual/

Excessive Loss or Disappearance, and 

Regulated Transactions in Tableting/

Encapsulating Machines 

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Drug Enforcement 

Administration (DEA), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until April 

7, 2015. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information proposed to be collected 

can be enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. Title of the Form/Collection: 

Reports of Regulated Transactions 

Involving Extraordinary Quantities, 

Uncommon Methods of Payment, and 

Unusual/Excessive Loss or 

Disappearance, and Regulated 

Transactions in Tableting/Encapsulating 

Machines. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Notification of extraordinary quantities, 

uncommon methods of payment, and 

unusual/excessive loss or disappearance 

of listed chemicals and regulated 

transactions in tableting/encapsulating 

machines is provided in writing on an 

as needed basis and does not require use 

of a form. The applicable component 

within the Department of Justice is the 

Drug Enforcement Administration, 

Office of Diversion Control. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Affected public (Primary): Business or 

other for-profit. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES