alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
99.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date:
March
31,
2009                                                                By:
/s/
Joseph M. Cummins


Joseph M.
Cummins


President, Chief
Executive Officer





Date:
March
31,
2009                                                                By:
/s/
Gary W. Coy


Gary W.
Coy


Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1   Consent of Marcum & Kliegman    LLP

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED        PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by    reference in the Registration Statement of Pegasus Communications Corporation    on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-22845-99, 333-22823-99, 333-52755-99, 333-33756-99    and 333-63154) of our report dated March 3, 2006 with respect to our audit    of the consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial    statement schedule of Pegasus Communications Corporation as of December 31,    2005 and 2004 and for the years then ended December 31, 2005, which report    is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pegasus Communications    Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Our report on the consolidated financial    statements refers to the adoption of new accounting pronouncements effective July    1, 2005 and March 31, 2004 and the deconsolidation of certain of the Company’s    subsidiaries effective June 2, 2004 due to the subsidiaries filing for Chapter    11 bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code. The deconsolidation    subsidiaries had represented substantially all of the Company’s operating    activities. 

\s\ Marcum & Kliegman LLPMarcum & KliegmanLLPMelville, New YorkApril 5, 2006

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 6, 2015, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech (“SEMATECH”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Dianippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd., Sunnyvale, CA; Soitec, San Diego, CA; Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA; Freescale Semiconductor, Austin, TX; and Winbond, San Jose, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 30, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 26, 2014 (79 FR 70555).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-02735 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
SERVED MAY 10, 2010 

';iAliU' 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRE:VOR MILLER 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0735 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

... On or before August 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

commencing August 23 and 24,2010, inclusive; U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 9.170, 

Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South lO"" Street, St. Louis, MO. 63102. 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. imd conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Trevor Miller 

2319 Sundance Drive 

O'Fallon, MO 63368 

TEL: 314-497-3602 

Yolanda A. Bemal, Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGG-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            42,105
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    496,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      108,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  55,223
<PP&E>                                           468,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,170,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,509,411
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           8,178
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,347,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,170,494
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,971,932
<CGS>                                          1,919,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,650,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                37,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (636,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (638,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  551,078
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (87,897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0416 Focus Ready Draft 7/2/2009 ENGINEER: Arnold \ AH/CLM PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: No Gen Eqpt: Respirator: Health Effects: TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use: Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (04/10/2009): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Unknown PBT rating: PBT1 P=U; B=U Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim: EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0416 Processing: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation: Dermal:CBI: No MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: Ariel Hou Organization: ERG CALL TO: Organization: Date: 04/13/2009 Time: 11AM Phone: Concerning what TSCA CBI? PMN: 09-0416
David Schick
137-40 75th Road
Flushing, New York 11367

March 4, 2002

Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement Between Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") and David Schick, dated December 20, 2001.

Dear David:

      Pursuant to the Resolution of the Company's Board of Directors, adopted
February 19, 2002, this letter serves to amend the Employment Agreement entered
into between Schick Technologies, Inc. and David Schick, dated December 20,
2001, by deleting therefrom Section III, paragraph 3, and replacing it with the
following provision:

      One hundred fifty thousand (150,000) employee stock options, to be issued
as follows, pursuant to the Company's 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan: (i)
50,000 of such options shall be issued as of December 20, 2001, and shall have
an exercise price equal to $1.05; and the remaining 100,000 of such options
shall be issued as of February 19, 2002, and shall have an exercise price of
$2.37; and (ii) the options shall vest in increments of one-third over the
3-year term of this Agreement (i.e., 50,000 shall be vested as of December 20,
2002, an additional 50,000 shall be vested as of December 20, 2003, and the
remaining 50,000 shall be vested as of December 20, 2004).

      Kindly acknowledge your agreement with the contents of this letter by
signing below.

      Thank you,


      /S/ Jeffrey Slovin                   /S/ David Schick
      ------------------                   ----------------
      Jeffrey Slovin                       David Schick
      President & C.O.O.                   C.E.O.
# C_2005119EN.01000201.xml

| 20.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 May 2005

(2005/C 119/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2642 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4462 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5433 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,13 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5772 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,205 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1615 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 144 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,890 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7266 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6669 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5952 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8498 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7765 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0913 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0987 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4632 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 946,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,804 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,057 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,3400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,456 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2642

JPY

Japanese yen

135,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4462

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5433

ISK

Iceland króna

82,13

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5772

CZK

Czech koruna

30,205

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1615

ROL

Romanian leu

36 144

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,890

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7266

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6669

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5952

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8498

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7765

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0913

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,65

ZAR

South African rand

8,0987

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4632

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 946,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,804

PHP

Philippine peso

69,057

RUB

Russian rouble

35,3400

THB

Thai baht

50,456

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT

                  THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 12, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Stuart Cartner, an
individual (the "LENDER").

                                    RECITALS:

                  WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and the Lender
executed a Loan and Pledge Agreement dated as of January 18, 2001 in the amount
of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT");

                  WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the Company and the Lender
executed that certain First Amendment to Loan and Pledge Agreement to clarify
certain provisions; and

                  WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to further amend and
modify the Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured
Promissory Note (the "NOTE") and, to reflect the new maturity date of the Note,
the Company and the Lender agree to cross out the old maturity date, February
14, 2001, from the fifth paragraph on the first page of the Note, to write in
the new maturity date of April 12, 2001 beside the crossed-out old maturity
date, and to sign the Note by the new maturity date to evidence the agreement of
the parties in amending the maturity date of the Note;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

                  1.       Amendment to the Loan Agreement. Section 1.3 of the
Loan Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:

                           "1.3     Repayment. The outstanding principal and
         interest is payable no later than April 12, 2001 at which time all of
         the outstanding and unpaid principal and interest shall be due and
         payable (the "MATURITY DATE"). All payments of principal and interest
         shall be made in U.S. Dollars."

                  2.       Non-Modification. Except to the extent amended and
modified hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect and shall remain unmodified and
enforceable.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
effective as of the date first above written.

                                    WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.,
                                      as Borrower

                                    By: /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer


                                       /s/ Stuart Cartner
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Stuart Cartner, as Lender
#### Kumbier (Erwin), Respondent, vs. Ramaker and others, Defendants and Respondents, and Kumbier (Frank), Appellant.

For the appellant: *Ernest H. Pett*and *Sanborn, Blake & Aberg,*all of Madison.

For the respondents: *Charles Voigt, Werner & Clemens,*and *Pulton H. Leberman,*all of Sheboygan, and *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland*and *Marvin P. Verhulst*of counsel, all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004273EN.01003001.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/30

---

Action brought on 4 August 2004 by Vladimir Boucek against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-318/04)

(2004/C 273/59)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 4 August 2004 by Vladimir Boucek, residing in Prague (Czech Republic), represented by Libuse Krafftova, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 29 March 2004 refusing the applicant admittance to the written test of the competition notification of which was given in Official Journal C 120 A/13; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 29 March 2004 refusing the applicant admittance to the written test of the competition notification of which was given in Official Journal C 120 A/13;

| — | restore the applicant to the position he was in before the adoption of the decision of 29 March 2004 to refuse him admittance; |
| --- | --- |

—

restore the applicant to the position he was in before the adoption of the decision of 29 March 2004 to refuse him admittance;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant submitted an application for competition EPSO/A/2/03 for the constitution of a reserve list of assistant administrators (A 8) of Czech nationality. According to the competition notice, the application was to be submitted by Internet. By the contested decision the applicant's candidature was refused on the ground that he had not submitted his written application within the time-limit prescribed.

The applicant challenges that decision. He submits that, at the time of publication of the results of the preselection tests and the connected invitation to submit personal documents to the defendant within three weeks, the defendant, exceptionally, sent no notice to the candidates by email, as it had done in all other phases of the competition. Thus that must be considered discontinuous, inconsistent and a serious procedural defect.

The applicant further asserts that, arbitrarily and in disregard of the purpose of the process, some qualified candidates who in the circumstances were unable to comply with the short time-limit imposed were rejected. The fixing of a time-limit of less than three weeks was wholly disproportionate in view of the overall duration of the procedure of nine months. The defendant did not sufficiently appreciate the importance of this phase of the competition and failed to take appropriate measures to make all hitherto successful candidates aware of the time-limit. By so doing, it failed to use its discretion in an appropriate manner.

---