alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (a) | The      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of      the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | Information      contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jacob Inbar                    |
|------------------------------------|
| By:      Jacob Inbar,              |
| Chief      Executive Officer       |
| (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2015 • 49ndle via BYEMAN 

• DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

5 February 1964 

MEMORANDUM FOR: "C" Project Officer 

"G" Project Officer 

Project Officer 

SUBJECT: Project Briefings 

From time to time there is a requirement to brief newly assigned or 

indoctrinated individuals on your project's operations and capabilities and your 

general responsibilities in management of the project. In order to have readily 

available an easily understandable series of briefings , I am asking each project 

officer to prepare, in draft form, an outline of a briefing and suggested graphic 

aids to support such a briefing. 

I do not propose that the briefing cover the technical portions in any 

significant detail. Detailed technical briefings on camera configurations, 

recovery techniques, film emulsions, booster capabilities, etc. , can, if 

required, be arranged with SAFSS-6. 

Some of the items I recommend you cover are: 

a. Functional chart showing where project fits in NRO, SAFSS 

and SAFSS-4 structure. 

b. Brief history of project. 

c. Project operational functions to include relationships with supporting SAFSS divisions and outside agencies. 

d. Brief description of how system works. 

You are not limited to only the above areas. Your outline should include 

any additional items you feel are necessary to adequately cover your project 

peculiarities. Outlines should be flexible in application so as to permit rapid 

tailoring or same briefings to fit individual needs of recipients. 

• Deputy for Operations 

NRO Staff
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation System-Sprinkler, Irrigation Water Management, Nutrient Management, Pumping Plant, Water Well.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements  at May 31, 1999 and for the nine
month period ended May 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial  statements.  Earnings per share information has been restated to
conform with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003934
<NAME>                        Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           321,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 26,407,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (877,000)
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              37,219,000
<PP&E>                                        42,207,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (22,019,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               119,571,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         14,727,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          55,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    20,209,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 119,571,000
<SALES>                                       56,165,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              56,165,000
<CGS>                                         27,980,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 27,980,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              20,193,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 315,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,841,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,151,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,259,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,892,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (542,000)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,350,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.26


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13214-003]


Lock 12 Hydro Partners, LLC; Kentucky Ravenna Hydroelectric 
Project; Notice of Revised Restricted Service List

    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides 
that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative 
efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a 
particular phase or issue in a proceeding. The restricted service list 
should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the 
judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active 
participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for 
which the list is established.
    The Commission staff is consulting with the Kentucky State Historic 
Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 
(Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory Council's regulations, 36 
CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the National Historic 
Preservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 470f), to prepare a 
Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, or eligible 
for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places at the 
proposed Ravenna Hydroelectric Project.
    On November 21, 2013, Commission staff established a restricted 
service list for the Ravenna Hydroelectric Project. Since that time, 
changes have occurred and therefore, the restricted service list is 
revised as follows:
    Replace ``Jill Howe, Kentucky Heritage Council'' with ``Kary 
Stackelbeck, or Representative, Kentucky Heritage Council.''

    Dated: February 2, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02429 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Complainant, 

# RECEIVED JUL 212014 

## HEARING DOCKET

VS. DocketNo. FAA-2013-1086 FAA Case No. 2011S0190181 PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPT., Respondent. Judge Sullivan
JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY PLAN Pursuant to the Judge's May 16, 2014, Order, the parties hereby submits the following jointproposed scheduling/discovery plan: July 23, 2014: Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference August 29, 2014: Deadline for Initial Disclosures September 30,2014: Deadline for Issuance oflnitial Written Discovery Requests November 3 through December 5, 2014: Depositions (ifneeded) December 12,2014: Deadline for Issuance ofSupplemental Discovery Requests January 16,2015: Close ofDiscovery February 13, 2015: Dispositive Motion Deadline February 27, 2015: Deadline to Respond to Dispositive Motions March 13,2015: Deadline for Replies in Support ofDispositive Motions This schedule shouldpermit a motion conference and appropriate time for pre-hearing submissions and pre-hearing briefbefore ahearing in or after May 2015. This scheduling plan has been discussed with Respondent's representative, Ms. Abdulrahrnan, and Respondent agrees to this proposal Respectfully submitted this /

# G~y ofJuly, 2014,

Christ pher R. Steve n Attorney Office ofthe Regional CounselCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Joint Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan has been sent this date bythe following methods: original and one copy via certified mail: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591
one copy via certified mail and facsimile: Nazihra M. Abdulrahman Soler Office ofLegal Affairs Puerto Rico Police Department P.O. Box 70166 San Juan, PR00936-8166 fax: (787) 781-7993 Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (EI1-310) Washington, DC 20590 fax: (202) 366-2131

Dated
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,456
<INVENTORY>                                     79,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,555
<PP&E>                                           6,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,692
<SALES>                                        129,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,845
<CGS>                                           99,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,076
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,593
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/Jan W. Clark
-------------------------------------
Jan W. Clark
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
# C_2005006EN.01003001.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/30

---

Action brought on 28 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-455/04)

(2005/C 6/54)

Language of procedure: English

An action against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 28 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Carmel O'Reilly, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission requests the Court to:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| 2. | order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 31 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 212, 7.8.2001, p. 12

1

---
# C_2004275EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 November 2004

(2004/C 275/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2911 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4316 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,116 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5273 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,23 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5774 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,42 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6788 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4314 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2636 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 684 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,708 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 884 400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7049 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5397 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0394 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8646 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1326 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0239 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2911

JPY

Japanese yen

136,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4316

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69625

SEK

Swedish krona

9,116

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5273

ISK

Iceland króna

87,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,23

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5774

CZK

Czech koruna

31,42

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6788

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4314

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2636

ROL

Romanian leu

40 684

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,708

TRL

Turkish lira

1 884 400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7049

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5397

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0394

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8646

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1326

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,86

ZAR

South African rand

8,0239

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
----

Action brought on 21 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-95/05)

(2005/C 93/38)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Knut Simonsson and Georgios Zavvos, of the Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 5 February 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 208 of 5.08.2002, p. 10.

----
Installing Digital Certificates for Electronic Information Exchange Instructions

1. Open Microsoft Internet Explorer web browser

2. Navigate to the NRC External Credential Service (Level 1 Digital 

Certificates) page

3. Select “Install CA” 

4. Select “Save”

5. Save the certificate file to a folder on your computer and make a note of 

this location.

6. Select “Save”

7. Select “Close” once the download is complete

8. In the Microsoft Internet Explorer web browser, select Tools > Internet 

Options 

9. Select the “Contents” tab

10. Select “Certificates”

11. Select the “Trusted Root Certification Authorities” tab

12. Select “Import”

13. Select “Next”

14. Select “Browse”

15. Browse to the location where the certificate file was saved.

16. Select the file

17. Select “Open”

18. Select “Next”

19. Select “Next”

20. Select “Finish”

21. If the “Security Warning” dialog box is displayed, select “Yes”

22. Select “OK”

23. Once certificates are obtained and installed, new and existing users can 

submit requests for records checks.

For further assistance with installing digital credentials, contact the EIE helpdesk 

at 866-672-7640.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-94439), Form S-3 (No.333-89683),
Form S-3 (No. 333-35846), Form S-8 (No. 333-50259) and Form S-3/A (File No. 333-
84115).


San Antonio, Texas                           /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
November 14, 2000
# C_2005057EN.01001101.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 13 January 2005

in Case C-356/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Elisabeth Mayer v Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder (1)

1

(Equal treatment for men and women - Maternity leave - Acquisition of pension rights)

(2005/C 57/20)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-356/03: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 9 July 2003, received at the Court on 18 August 2003, in the proceedings between Elisabeth Mayer and Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder – the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), K. Schiemann and E. Juhász, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 13 January 2005, in which it has ruled:

Elisabeth Mayer

Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder

Article 6(1)(g) of Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes, as amended by Council Directive 96/97/EC of 20 December 1996, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national rules under which a worker acquires no rights to an insurance annuity which is part of a supplementary occupational pension scheme during statutory maternity leave paid in part by her employer because the acquisition of those rights is conditional upon the worker's receiving taxable pay during the maternity leave.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 01.11.2003.

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Aquatic Organism Passage , Integrated Pest Management, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Shallow Water Development and Management, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Wetland Creation, Wetland Enhancement, Wetland Restoration.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.