alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        hv@eq8er
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           219,188
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          9,782
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,973
<EQUITIES>                                     7,908
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,745
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 244,704
<CASH>                                         4,110
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             10,743
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         10,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,412
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                141,220
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            55,945
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 9,561
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          5,838
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,412
<PREMIUMS>                                     130,780
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            15,952
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (640)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 905
<BENEFITS>                                     94,977
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    38,160
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,676
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            8467
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                1,543
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.74
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 137,978
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            100,418
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (5,441)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             50,122
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               39,795
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                141,220
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        5,441



</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 18, 2013

NO. 03-12-00734-CV

Donna Hopper, Individually and as Surviving Spouse and on behalf of the Estate of 

Robert Hopper, and as Guardian of Dylon Hopper and Fallon Hopper; Keegan Hopper; 

Justin Hopper; and Trevor Hopper, Appellants

v.

Argonaut Insurance Company and Kimberly Barrett, Adjuster, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial 

court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s 

judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 1, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Theodore D. Gelman
(the "LENDER").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and Lender executed a Loan and
Pledge Agreement dated as of January 18, 2001 (the "LOAN DATE") in the amount of
50,000 dollars ($ 50,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to amend and modify the Loan
Agreement as of the Loan Date to clarify certain provisions.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. The ", or" shall be deleted
from the end of Section 3.5(i), and the following shall be added:

                  "or under substantially similar terms as those set forth in
                  this Agreement, or"

         2.       EFFECTIVE TIME OF AMENDMENT. The amendment and modification to
the Loan Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactively
effective as of the Loan Date.

         3.       NON-MODIFICATION. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the Loan Date.

                                     WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.


                                     By:  /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer


                                     LENDER


                                     By:  /s/ Theodore D. Gelman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Theodore D. Gelman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                     Title:
                                           -------------------------------------
## Exhibit C Pinnacl X Fixed Wing UAS Maintenance

Pinnacl X Page 1 The FW Chameleon and the Ultra S tick 120 and 25e s UAS is not authorized to fly over uncontrolled

, public areas, road ways, boat traffic areas or any other areas which involve flight over privet property

and people.

Maintenance and Testing

 Maintenance and repair must be recorded in the maintenance log book

 Inspection prior to first flight each day , see preflight inspection

50 hour or 2 months or flight in a dusty environment, inspection and test

 Remove top cover , bottom cover (if on aircraft) and top f rame plate

 Check for cracks and replace as necessary

 Check the security of the, receiver, data radio, auto pilot, ESC and wiring

 Replace Velcro tape and or vibration mounting as necessary

 Check the ESC connections to the autopilot

 Check the receiver connec tion to the autopilot and receiver

 Check the wiring to the GPS, buzzer, switch, data radi o, video and power wiring

 Use lock tight medium on bolts and reassemble the top frame

 Recalibrate aircraft as necessary if any of the electronics were replaced

 Range c heck the pilot an d observer transmitters, see transmitter manuals

 Perform preflight check list

 Bench test aircraft , pitch roll and yaw control with computor . Check maximum power

 Record flights using GSC

 Flight test aircraft (In all cases listed below the f ixed wing aircraft must be controllable to pass)

 Manual mode maximum thrust take off and climb out

 Manual mode roll aircraft, loop aircraft, stall and spin aircraft, at mid and maximum throttle

settings

 Manual mode stall spin aircraft and switch modes to semi

- autonomous . Auto pilot should

recover aircraft

 Fly aircraft a ways away and switch to RTL

 Fly basic patterns in AUTO mode

 Perform post flight check list

100 hr or one year inspection and test

 Perform 50hr inspection and test

 Replace propellers at 100hrs (Until propeller life is determined)

 Replace motors at 100hrs (Until motor life is determined)

 Replace ESCs at 100hrs (Until ESC life is determined)
S. 1170 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United 

States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer 

research, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Research Stamp 

Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER 

RESEARCH. 

Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL POSTAGE 

STAMP SALES ARE USED FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is amended 

in the matter following subparagraph (B) by adding at the end 

the following: ‘‘An agency that receives amounts from the Postal 

Service under this paragraph shall use the amounts for breast 

cancer research.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 21 October 2004

in Case C-447/02 P: KWS Saat AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Colour per se - Orange colour)

(2004/C 300/31)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-447/02 P: appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged on 11 December 2002 by KWS Saat AG, established in Einbeck (Germany) (represented by C. Rohnke), the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: D. Schennen and G. Schneider) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

----

(1) OJ C 55 du 8.3.2003.

----
*February 5, 1929.*

#### Lind, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For .the appellant: *Eugene A. Clifford*of Juneau.

For the respondents Industrial Commission and Sommer-corns: *John W. Reynolds,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent Dodge County: *John A. Thiel*of May-ville, district attorney.

For the respondent ./Etna Life Insurance Company: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Arthur B. Doe,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court,*

Judgment affirmed.
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2012-0728 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-050-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval 

Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to 

submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON 

CONTACTED

DATE RESPONSE

Boeing Bob Takara 1/17/2012 Concur.

A4A Mike Bianchi 2/27/2012 No Response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
EXHIBIT 10.19



                              THINK NEW IDEAS, INC.
                         45 WEST 36TH STREET, 12TH FLOOR
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018


                                  May 24, 1999


                                                             VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Ronald Bloom
250 Mercer Street, #D203
New York, New York 10012

Re:      Employment Agreement of June 30, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement")

Dear Ron:

      This is to confirm  to you that,  pursuant  to  Section 2 of that  certain
Employment Agreement, dated June 30, 1996, between you and THINK New Ideas, Inc.
(the  "Company"),  the  Company has agreed to extend  your  employment  with the
Company  for a period  of one year  (the  "Extension  Period")  commencing  upon
expiration  of the current term of your  employment at the close of business one
June 30,  1999 at an  increased  annual  salary of  $350,000  (representing  the
aggregate of $29,167  in Monthly Compensation, as defined in Section 4(a) of the
Employment  Agreement).  The Company has further agreed that, should the Company
terminate your employment  prior to expiration of the Extension Period for other
than "Just  Cause" (as such term is  defined in Section  9(a) of the  Employment
Agreement),  you shall be entitled to receive a payment equal to the product of:
(a) the Monthly Compensation multiplied by (b) the number of months remaining in
the Extension  Period plus twelve months and the  Non-Competition  provision set
forth in Section 10 of the Employment  Agreement shall automatically  terminate.
The  Employment  Agreement  shall  remain in  effect  for the  Extension  Period
unmodified except as set forth herein.

      Please know that your service and contribution to the Company is sincerely
appreciated.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   /s/ Kenneth Orton

                                                   Kenneth Orton on behalf
                                                   of the Compensation Committee

cc: Mr. Melvin Epstein
    Cindi Lefari, Esq.
    Victoria A. Baylin, Esq.
Impurity Analysis Cs2SiF6 

Lot. 210011B001

Parameter anlytical result compound calculated content CAS

Li

Na Na2SiF6 0.0000% 16893-85-9

K K2SiF6 0.0000% 16871-90-2

Rb Rb2SiF6 0.0000% n.a.

Ca CaSiF6 0.0000% 16925-39-6

Mg MgSiF6 0.0000% 18972-56-0

Sr

Ba

Al Al2(SiF6)3 0.0000% 17099-70-6

Fe Fe2(SiF6)3 0.0000% 12062-26-9

Cr

Mn

P calc. as P2O5 Cs3PO4 0.0000% 69089-35-6

SO4 Cs2SO4 0.0000% 10294-54-9

sum 0.0000% 0.0000%

molar mass

Na 22.99

K 39.098

Rb 85.468

Ca 40.078

Mg 24.305

Al 26.982

Fe 55.847

P2O5 141.943

PO4 94.97

SO4 96.062

Cs 132.91

SiF6 142.08
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BioScrip, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard M. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: June 6, 2014





/s/ Richard M. Smith


Richard M. Smith,


President, Chief Executive Officer


and Principal Executive Officer
|Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As
independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated October 30, 2001, on the consolidated financial statements of
Tanisys Technology, Inc. as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and for the years
ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, included in Tanisys Technology,
Inc.s Form 10-K/A file number 0-29038, into this Form 10-K for New Century
Equity Holdings Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and into New
Century Equity Holdings Corp.s previously filed Registration Statements
(SEC File No. 333-08249, 333-08251, 333-08257, 333-08303, 333-11492, 333-30854,
333-30856, 333-30926, 333-36785, 333-37420, 333-55316, 333-64325, 333-66903,
333-70947 and 333-70951).
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ BROWN, GRAHAM AND COMPANY, P.C.
| |  | -----------------------------------

|Austin, TexasApril 11, 2002
|---------------------------
*June 18, 1928.*

#### Estate of Berndt.

For the appellants: *L. A. Schweichler*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Ernst von Briesen*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.7
 First Amendment to the  Sterling Chemicals, Inc.  Amended and Restated Salaried Employees Pension Plan
 Whereas Corporation Existing
Plan
 Whereas
 Whereas Amendment
 Now, Therefore
 Amendment of Section 1.1 of the Existing Plan
 Early Retirement Date
 (1)
    
    for a Participant who elects to commence payments while he continues in
employment with his Employer or an Affiliated Company, as permitted under Section
6.1 of the Plan, the first day of the month following the later of (a) the month in
which he meets the eligibility requirements to receive early retirement benefits
while continuing employment with his Employer or an Affiliated Company under
Section 6.1 or (b) the month in which he makes written application for an early
retirement benefit; or(2)
    
    for a Participant who does not elect to commence payments while he continues
in employment with his Employer or an Affiliated Company, the first day of the
month following the later of the month in which he retires after meeting the
eligibility requirements in Section 6.1 or the month in which he makes written
application for an early retirement benefit, but not, in either case, later than
his Normal Retirement Date.
 Amendment of Section 6.1 of the Existing Plan




---



##### 



Amendment of Section 6.2 of the Existing Plan
 6.2 Amount
  (a)
    
    Except as otherwise provided in Section 6.1 or in paragraph (b) below, the
amount of such benefit shall be reduced by 1/4 of one percent for each full
calendar month by which his Annuity Starting Date precedes his Normal Retirement
Date.(b)
    
    If the sum of a Participants age and years of Service equals or exceeds 80
on his Early Retirement Date and his Early Retirement Date is on or after April 1,
1999, the reduction in the preceding paragraph will not be applied to Section
5.2(a) and item (1) of Section 5.2(b); provided the Participant meets one of the
following requirements:
 (i)
    
    the Participant is retiring directly from active
employment or is electing to commence his early retirement benefit
while still actively employed by his Employer or an Affiliated Company
and, in either case, the sum of the Participants age plus years of
Service equals or exceeds 80 as of his Early Retirement Date; or(ii)
    
    the Participant earned Credited Service after he became
a Participant in the Plan and his termination of employment is a result
of a reduction in workforce and, after his involuntary termination, the
sum of his age and years of Service reaches or exceeds 80.
   -2-




---



##### 



Amendment of Section 11.1 of the Existing Plan
 11.1 Suspension of Benefits for Rehired Retired Participants
  Effect of Amendments
 Binding Effect
 Severability
 Governing Law To The Extent Not Superseded By The Laws Of The United
States, This Amendment Shall Be Construed and Enforced in Accordance With, and
the Rights of the Parties Shall Be Governed By, the Internal Laws of the State of Texas, Without
Reference to Principles of Conflicts of Law.
 -3-




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof
 Sterling Chemicals, Inc./s/ Richard K. CrumpRichard K. Crump, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
 -4-
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3651 — APAX/Cinven/CBR Group)

(2005/C 9/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
*May 1, 1934.*

#### Thewalt, Appellant, vs. Union Automobile Insurance Company and another, Defendants: Thewalt and another, Respondents.

‘For the appellant: *Joseph A. Padway,*attorney, and *Nora B. Padzvay*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Thomas E. Torphy*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                             BANK ONE, ARIZONA, N.A.
                       BANC ONE AUTO GRANTOR TRUST 1996-B



The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Bank One, Arizona, N.A., as
Servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to Section 3.10(a) of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 1996 (the "Agreement") between the
Servicer, Banc One ABS Corporation, as Seller, and Bankers Trust Company, as
Trustee, does hereby certify on behalf of the Servicer as follows:

1) Bank One, Arizona, N.A., is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the
   Agreement.

2) Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as
   set forth in the Agreement.

3) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1,
   1998 to December 31, 1998 (the "Applicable Period") and of its performance
   under the Agreement has been made by me or under my supervision.

4) Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
   fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the Applicable
   period and no default in the fulfillment of such obligations has occurred or
   is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

5) The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
   Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to
   have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 1998: NONE.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this
Certificate as of the 31st day of December 1998.



                                      BANK ONE, ARIZONA, N.A., as Servicer




                                      By:    /s/ Tracie H. Klein
                                             -------------------
                                      Name:  Tracie H. Klein
                                      Title: Vice President