alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 of 3

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------)

)

Benjamin Edelman, )

 third-party complainant )

)

v. ) Docket DOT-OST-2013-0214

)

American Airlines, Inc. ) 

)

------------------------------------------------------)

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FILINGS

Comments with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Benjamin Edelman

169 Walnut St.

Brookline, MA 02445

E-mail: ben@benedelman.org

Dated: January 30, 2014
2 of 3

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

---------------------------------------------------------------)

)

Benjamin Edelman, )

 third-party complainant )

)

v. ) Docket DOT-OST-2013-0214

)

American Airlines, Inc. ) 

)

---------------------------------------------------------------)

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FILINGS

1. I believe further briefing can help address questions of fact and law raised 

by Air Europa’s Answer, thereby clarifying the issues presented to DOT.

2. I propose a single further reply and surreply. My reply accompanies this 

motion.

3. I requested Air Europa’s consent to this further briefing. Air Europa’s 

counsel did not object to such further briefing.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/

Benjamin Edelman
3 of 3

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have, this 30th day of January, 2014 caused a copy of the foregoing 

Motion to be served by electronic mail on the following persons:

Aaron A. Goerlich, Esq. agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com

Samuel Podberesky, Esq. sam.podberesky@dot.gov

/s/

_____________________

Benjamin Edelman
STATE OF NEVADA Jim Gibbons, Governor 

Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Allen Biaggi, Director 

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E., Administrator 

January 5, 2009 

Bruce Polkowsky, Air Resources Division 

NPS-ARD 

P.O. Box 25287 

Denver, CO 80225 

Dear Mr. Polkowsky: 

In accordance with the USEPA Regional Haze Rule (RHR) requirements, Nevada is hereby 

providing the opportunity for the Federal Land Managers (FLMs) to review and comment on 

Nevada's draft Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (RH SIP). It is our understanding that 

you are the point of contact for this review; however, we are sending a copy ofthis letter to those 

FLM representatives listed below for expediency. Nevada's RH SIP and BART support 

documents may be accessed at ftp.anonymous.state.nv.us (if control/click does not work, type 

this address into your browser). The user name is "ftp.anonymous" and the password is 

"stateftp". Once into the site, go to NDEPIBAQPIFLM Consultation- RH SIP. We are also 

sending a single hard copy to you. 

In addition to the SIP, you will find a subfolder called "BART Documents" in the FLM folder. 

BART analyses prepared by Nevada sources for units subject to BART are in that folder, as well 

as Nevada's review of selected source analyses. Please note certain chapters in the SIP contain 

links to the Nevada Division of Enviromnental Protection (NDEP) web site for BART support 

documents, but the documents are not posted, yet. You must use the ftp site postings. 

In late October/early November, Rick Graw and Don Shepherd did an informal review at 

NDEP's request of Nevada's proposed BART regulation and the supporting BART analyses. 

We discussed Rick's comments in a conference call with him in early November. We did not 

have time to respond directly to Don's comments (a series of e-mails) before the BART 

regulation went to the State Environmental Commission (SEC) for adoption on November 12. 

However, we revised the proposed regulation at the SEC Hearing in response to some of Don's 

comments, and we also made a number of revisions to the SIP. 

Once we have received the FLM comments or at the end of 60 days from this letter, we plan to 

hold a public comment period and will make the FLM comments available to the public. Feel 

free to contact me if you have any questions during your review. You may reach me at (775) 

687-9356 or bye-mail at amalone@ndep.nv.gov. 

ele K. Malone, Supervisor 

Planning and Modeling Branch 

Bureau of Air Quality Planning 

90 I S. Stewart Street, Suite 400 I • Carson City. Nevada 8970 I • p: 775.687.4670 • f: 775.687.5856 • www.ndep.nv.gov 

p,ln<.d on ~td pop., 
January 5, 2009 

Bruce Polkowsky 

Page 2 

cc:	 Colleen Cripps, Deputy Administrator, NDEP 

Mike Eiges, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP 

Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau ofAir Pollution Control, NDEP 

Rick Graw, Forest Service, USDA 

Scott Copeland, Forest Service, USDA 

Don Shepherd, National Park Service, 001 

Tim Allen, Fish and Wildlife Service, DOl
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis D. Oklak,Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.
|        |   | /s/ Dennis D. Oklak                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   | Dennis D. Oklak                      |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | of the General Partner               |
|   |   | Date: August 13, 2007                |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retainedby Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
# C_2005057EN.01003301.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/33

---

Action brought on 15 December 2004 by Falcon Sporting Goods AG against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-487/04)

(2005/C 57/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 December 2004 by Falcon Sporting Goods AG, established in Zug (Switzerland), represented by Jörg Weigell, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Decision R 176/2004-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision R 176/2004-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2004;

| — | order OHIM to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘BIN LADIN’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 18, 25, 28, 35 and 41 – Application No 2 223 907. |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner: | Refusal to register. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal. |
| Pleas in law: | Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Council Regulation No 40/94. The applicant claims that registration of the mark in question would not be contrary to either public policy or accepted principles of morality. |

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark ‘BIN LADIN’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 18, 25, 28, 35 and 41 – Application No 2 223 907.

Decision of the examiner:

Refusal to register.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Council Regulation No 40/94. The applicant claims that registration of the mark in question would not be contrary to either public policy or accepted principles of morality.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2015

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, May 6, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, May 6, 2021
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1163 

To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide flexibility 

and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of 

Native American languages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. UDALL (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to 

provide flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native American languages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Lan5 guages Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1163 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES GRANT PROGRAM. 

2 Section 803C of the Native American Programs Act 

3 of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2991b–3) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (b)(7)— 

5 (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking 

6 ‘‘10’’ and inserting ‘‘5’’; and 

7 (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking 

8 ‘‘15’’ and inserting ‘‘10’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (e)(2)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘or 3-year basis’’ and in11 serting ‘‘3-year, 4-year, or 5-year basis’’; and 

12 (B) by inserting ‘‘, 4-year, or 5-year’’ after 

13 ‘‘on a 3-year’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LAN15 GUAGES PROGRAM. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 816(e) of the Native 

17 American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is 

18 amended by striking ‘‘2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘2016 through 2020’’. 

20 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 816 of the 

21 Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 

22 2992d) is amended in subsections (a) and (b) by striking 

23 ‘‘subsection (e)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘sub24 section (d)’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2004300EN.01005001.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/50

---

Action brought on 4 October 2004 by André Bonnet against the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(Case T-406/04)

(2004/C 300/96)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Court of Justice of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 4 October 2004 by André Bonnet, residing in Saint Pierre de Vassols (France), represented by Hervé de Lépinau, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions of 11 February 2004, 4 March 2004 and 2 July 2004, and also the decision appointing another person to the post which was to have been filled by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of 11 February 2004, 4 March 2004 and 2 July 2004, and also the decision appointing another person to the post which was to have been filled by the applicant;

| — | hold that the recruitment of 4 February 2004 must take full effect as from 1 March 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that the recruitment of 4 February 2004 must take full effect as from 1 March 2004;

| — | order the Court of Justice of the European Communities to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 100 000 for non-material damage and also the sum of EUR 5 000 a month with effect from 1 March until such time as the applicant actually takes up his duties; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Justice of the European Communities to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 100 000 for non-material damage and also the sum of EUR 5 000 a month with effect from 1 March until such time as the applicant actually takes up his duties;

| — | in the alternative, if the decision of the Court of First Instance should not make it inevitable that the applicant take up his duties, order the Court of Justice to pay the applicant a total sum of EUR 260 000 plus interest at the statutory rate as from the date of the present application; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the decision of the Court of First Instance should not make it inevitable that the applicant take up his duties, order the Court of Justice to pay the applicant a total sum of EUR 260 000 plus interest at the statutory rate as from the date of the present application;

| — | in any case, order the Court of Justice of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any case, order the Court of Justice of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law put forward by the applicant are exactly the same as those that he put forward in Case T-132/04 (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 168 of 26 June 2004, p. 7.

1

---
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NO T FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED N. H., MOTHER OF C.R., A CHILD ,
Case No

. 5D22

- 472 Lt. C ase N o. 2 019

- DP

- 106 Appellant ,
v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES , Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed July 19 , 2 022 Appeal from the Circuit C ourt for Hernando County , Stephen E

. T oner, Jr., J udge. Ana G omez -M allada, Ft. L auderdale, for Appellant. Rachel Batten , of Children’s Legal Serv ices, Department of Children and Families, Brooksville, for Appellee. S ara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director o f Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, of Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and NARDELLA , JJ., concur.
,, I 

! 

\ 

i 

/2513222 

8T 

xxxxx 

aiARGE 63_, 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111702 

~ IIIMHIIIIIIUIUlllllllilUKllll~m11m1RliM 14.00078185? 

1 JUN ?5 AM 

SAFSS 

v 0; 

S E e R E T ~513212 JUNE 69 Cl TE WHIG 9075 

CHAfGE 

~ I 

THIS CONFIRMS OUR PftlNE CONVERSATION CONCERNI N.; THE 

RETURN OF 2202.JJ.IJ OUNCES OF PLATINUM TO GSA. GSA WILL 

ACCEPT DEL IVERY AT 1030 ON TUESDAY 9 8 JULY i N ACCORDANCE 

WITH T'f( SHIPPING INSTRUCTIONS PREVIOUSLY PROVIOEO. ANY 

ONE OF THE FOllO#IM; tNOIVIDULAlS MAY ACCEPT DELIVERY 

EACH INJIVIDUAL Will POSSESS AN IDENTIFICATION CARO (GSA 

FORM 22) ltTH PICTURE; THIS IS SUFFICIENT RECOGNITION ANJ 

AUTHORITY TO RELEASE THE PlATI NUM. 

SE6RET 

BT 

N 

N 

N 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111702 

. c. L-L'.f."\ ""'- r/ , •,
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7826

ARTHUR CARL DOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

QUALITY DENTAL SERVICE; CYNTHIA IDZIK, Doctor,

DDS; OSWALD WARNER, Doctor, DDS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-98-157-AW)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Bernard Tetrault, PRISM, Chestertown, Maryland, for Appellant. Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Carl Dove appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Dove v. Quality Dental Serv., No. CA-98-

157-AW (D. Md. Nov. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5853-5854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that

[[Page 5854]]

the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on 
Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Litigation Matter;
    Adjudicatory Matter; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 29, 2015.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02102 Filed 1-30-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require that certain standards for commercial driver’s 

licenses applicable to former members of the armed services or reserves also apply to current members of the 

armed services or reserves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2258 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Active Duty Voluntary 

3 Acquisition of Necessary Credentials for Employment 

4 Act’’ or the ‘‘ADVANCE Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE STANDARDS FOR 

6 SERVICE MEMBERS AND VETERANS. 

7 Section 31305(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘VET10 ERAN OPERATORS’’ and inserting ‘‘SERVICE MEM11 BERS, RESERVISTS, AND VETERANS’’; 

12 (2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘subpara13 graph (A) during’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph 

14 (A)— 

15 ‘‘(i) while serving in the armed forces 

16 or reserve components; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) during’’; and 

18 (3) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘current 

19 or’’ before ‘‘former’’ each place the term appears. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
(' 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEA~ DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

To: L. Molaskey 

From: T. Urban 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

, TEST EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT 

TE 405 

Sf " ~ 

;.J ", f . ...L" ,S", 15 September 1971 

Subject: Trip to Container Research Corp., Glen Riddle, Pa.·on 9-14-71, 

RX-3, Container #71-618, P. O. 63164 TA '. 

Purpose: To witness qualification of the subject container with 

PECO Quality Control. 

Personnel Contacted: George Lewis - Marketing. & Production 

Fred Schmidt - Engineering 

Ed Scholtz .. Sales 

Summary: The Container Research Corp., was extensiv~ly damaged by 

a flash flood on 9-14-71) thereby curtailing all operatio~s. The container 

and cover less wood skids and casters was salvaged. Container Research was 

directed to ship the salvaged container as scheduled. Prior to the flood, 

Container Research loaded the container with 7,000 lbs (water and weights) 

and qualified its structural integrity under handling, with lifting hooks and 

lift truck. This was not witnessed by PECO personnel. 

Discussion: The main office of Container Research was flOoded with 

6 feet of water Virtually destroying their engineering, sal~s, purchasing and 

management offices. Almost all drawings and paperwork were lost. The manUfacturing fac.i.1ity was full of silt about a foot deep and c.ontainers were 

scattered allover. The RX-3 container was on a higher level and escaped 

damage. The cover was located in the silt, undamaged,and was assembled to 

the container for shipment. The casters and skids were in the stock room and 

only one caster could be located up to 4 P.M. on 9-14-71. They will continue 

to look for them and advise as soon as possible, although the outlook is not 

good. The fast currents during the fldodcould have carried the casters and 

skids·out thru smashed doors or windows into the river. 

\ 

It is noted that Container Research cooperated fully under very difficult conditions and this was acknowledged. 

TU/mf 

cc: M. Shaw 

Richard Sisk 

T. Urban 

i