alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I,
Gilbert Hu, certify that:
 
 
 
 1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      AltiGen Communications, Inc.;  2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      registrant and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
  ****Date: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Gilbert HuGilbert HuChief
      Executive Officer
#### Andersen, Respondent, vs. Beck, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bundy,'Beach & Holland*of Eau Claire.

For the respondent: *Varnum & Varnum*of Hudson and *Edwin C. Brown*of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Jonathan B. Hill

T: +1 202 776 2725 jhill @cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM January 28 , 2014

Esta Rosenberg , Chief
U.S. Air Carrier Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0009

Dear Ms. Rosenberg :

JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) ha s completed its polling of carriers served with its application for Blanket Statement of Authorization. JetBlue ha s received a “no objection” from all
carriers who were served with the application a nd are still operating. 1

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

c c: S ervice List

1 JetBlue inadvertently served the application on Evergreen International Airlines (“Evergreen”). Evergreen and its relevant affiliated entities filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on December 31, 2013, and a ppear to have ceased operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES U.S. TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                6
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCES>                                          1
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8
<PP&E>                                              495
<DEPRECIATION>                                      145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                14
<BONDS>                                             376
<COMMON>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        358
<SALES>                                              48
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     67
<CGS>                                                49
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        12
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (4)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (4)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005061EN.01000201.xml

| 11.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3734 — Ericsson/H3G)

(2005/C 61/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 February 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Ericsson Telecomunicazioni S.p.A, and Ericsson Network Services Italia S.p.A. (both ‘Ericsson’, Italy), controlled by the group Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (‘Gruppo Ericsson’, Sweden) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of parts of H3G S.p.A. (‘H3G’, Italy) by way of rental of assets.

1

On 1 March 2005, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2004179EN.01000701.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Conseil d'Etat (Belgium), XIIIth Chamber, by judgment of that court of 29 April 2004 in the case Inter-Environnement Wallonnie against Région wallonne

th

(Case C-208/04)

(2004/C 179/14)

A reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Conseil d'Etat (Belgium), XIIIth Chamber, of 29 April 2004, received at the Court Registry on 11 May 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case Inter-Environnement Wallonnie against Région wallonne on the following question:

th

‘Is Article 1(a) of Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 (1), as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 (2), to be construed as allowing Member States to create, by means of a legal rule, a category of materials which do not come either under the category of waste or that of products but may none the less either meet the definition of waste set out in Article 1(a) or contain substances or objects which meet that definition of waste?’

1

2

---

(1)  Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste (OJ L 194 of 25.07.1975, p. 39).

1

(2)  Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste (OJ L 78 of 26.03.1991, p. 32).

2

---
----

Action brought on 24 September 2004 by Salvatore Gagliardi against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (O.H.I.M.)

(Case T-392/04)

(2004/C 284/57)

Language in which the application was submitted: Italian

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 September 2004 by Salvatore Gagliardi, proprietor of the one-man business of the same name, represented by Alex Schmitt, Prof. Paolo Biavati and Sandro Corona, lawyers.

The company Norma Lebensmittelfilaialbetrieb GmbH & Co. KG was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
Exhibit
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Forms
      S-8 (Nos.
      333-69174 and 333-69168) of Point.360 **** and
      subsidiaries **** of
      our
      report dated February 10, 2006, appearing
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Point.360 and subsidiaries for the three
      years ended December 31, 2005.











Singer
      Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein LLP (signed)


March
      29,
      2006
# C_2004243EN.01000601.xml

| 30.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/6

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2004/C 243/05)

Image

National side of the new 2 euro commemorative circulation coin issued by Luxembourg

National side of the new 2 euro commemorative circulation coin issued by Luxembourg

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. With a view to informing the parties professionally handling coins and the public at large, the Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1). In accordance with the relevant Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins under the condition that only one such coin is issued per Member State and per year and that the EUR 2 denomination is used. These coins correspond to the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative feature on the obverse national side.

1

2

1.   Member State: Luxembourg

Member State

2.   Commemorative feature: effigy and monogram of Grand-Duke Henri

Commemorative feature

3.   Factual description of the design: the coin depicts on the left hand of the inner part the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri, looking to the right, and on the right hand the monogram of the Grand-Duke Henri (special letter ‘H’ topped with a crown). The 12 stars appear in semi-circular form at the right of the monogram. The year 2004, surrounded by the mint mark as well as the engraver's initials, and the word LËTZEBUERG are written in circular form at the top of the ring. The words ‘HENRI — Grand-Duc de Luxembourg’ appear at the bottom of the ring.

Factual description of the design

4.   Issuing volume: maximum 2,49 million coins

Issuing volume

5.   Approximate issuing date:

Approximate issuing date

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for a reference to all national sides that have been issued up until now.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 22

The subsidiaries of American TeleSource International, Inc. are as follows:

     State or Other Company                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
     ----------------------                        -----------------------------
ATSI Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. ("ATSI-COM")                 Mexico
American TeleSource International, Inc.                        Canada
American TeleSource International, Inc.                        Texas
American TeleSource International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.      Mexico
GlobalSCAPE, Inc.                                              Delaware
Sistema de Telefonia Computarizada, S.A. de C.V. ("Computel")  Mexico
Servicios de Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. ("Sinfra")          Mexico
TeleSpan, Inc. ("TeleSpan")                                    Texas
ATSI de CentroAmerica, S.A.                                    Costa Rica
# C_2005006EN.01003203.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/32

---

Removal from the register of Case C-93/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 6/61)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 6 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-93/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)   OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
.i 

I 

l 

l 

l 

1 

I ' 

j 

I 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111776 HA NOL[ VIA 

TOP SECRET- BYEMAN 

~ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C, 

THE NRO STAFF January 29, 1969 

HANOL! VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. FLAX 

SUBJECT: Naval Oceanographic Office Participation in an ARGO 

Subcommittee 

Problem: 

To determine the desirability of Naval Oceanographic Office 

participation in an ARGO Subcommittee. 

Bac,kground: 

Don Steininger has a group working on Phase IV of the ARGO 

plan. This is the phase in which ARGO moves from "Look what is 

available to us '' to ''What do we really need? 11 

Pre sent Status: 

Don has written a letter to you (see Tab A) requesting your concurrence in having representatives of the Naval Oceanographic Office 

advise Phase IV ARGO on the applicability of satellite photography to 

the marine sciences. Specifically, he would like to have ''Captain 

T. K. Treadwell and his people give advice and support to our working 

group. 11 

Discussion: 

The immediate question which comes to mind is, "Why is Don 

asking DNRO approval of this kind of support? 11 It turns out that the 

Navy -- and Don -- have felt that the restrictions imposed on service 

representatives in the earth-sensing area are substantially more 

severe than is actually the case. I have explained to Don that the 

TOP SECRET- [XCI.UOEO rROM AUTOMATIC ftEGIIIAOING 

000 DIA[CTIY[ 5100.10 000 NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111776 

co,v ___ o, ___ coP1u 
HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYS T£ M 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111776 HANOI£ VIA 

--18P SEC RE I BYEMAN 

restrictions to supporting other organizations are directed specifically 

toward NASA. In addition, even if the restrictions were applied to 

ARGO (and they are not), your letter of May 15 to Dr. Seamans (Tab B) 

is very liberal and specifically approves the investigation of "how 

imagery derived from overhead sensors can be used to determine information of scientific interest about the oceans and waters of the 

wo:rld ••• " 

Don still feels he wants and needs your coordination. 

Recommendation: 

That you sign the attached letter to Don, concurring in Navy 

participation in ARGO IV. 

PAULE. WORTHMAN 

Colonel, USAF 

T8P SECrtET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC flEGRAOING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOCS HOT .. PLY 

\ 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111776 

CONTROL NO. ______ _ 

co,v ___ o, ___ co,iu 

ltAGE ___ o, ___ PAGl:S
# Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard and supporting documents for Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) (9/2020) Standard Document(53.1 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) Overview(435.92 KB)

Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) CPPE(24.43 KB)

Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control (Ac.) (400) Network Diagram(69.7 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
IMC HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                 SERIES 1996-2
                                                                
                                   1996 TOTAL
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                
CLASS      ORIGINAL        BEGINNING                                                         ENDING                      ENDING
         CERTIFICATE     CERTIFICATE      PRINCIPAL        INTEREST         TOTAL          CERTIFICATE     SUBORDINATE  PRINCIPAL
           BALANCE         BALANCE      DISTRIBUTION      DISTRIBUTION    DISTRIBUTION       BALANCE          AMOUNT     BALANCE
<S>     <C>            <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>           <C>
                                                                
A-1     62,442,000.00   62,442,000.00   25,158,572.83    2,338,995.28    27,497,568.11   37,283,427.17           
A-2     28,489,000.00   28,489,000.00            0.00    1,287,702.80    1,287,702.80    28,489,000.00           
A-3     26,630,000.00   26,630,000.00            0.00    1,239,182.64    1,239,182.64    26,630,000.00           
A-4     10,730,000.00   10,730,000.00            0.00      507,886.64      507,886.64    10,730,000.00           
A-5     24,786,000.00   24,786,000.00            0.00    1,212,861.60    1,212,861.60    24,786,000.00           
A-6     15,882,000.00   15,882,000.00            0.00      820,570.00      820,570.00    15,882,000.00           
A-7     16,041,000.00   16,041,000.00            0.00      850,173.04      850,173.04    16,041,000.00  4,440,000.00 164,281,427.17
A-8     15,000,000.00   15,000,000.00    4,176,335.62      636,579.85    4,812,915.47    10,823,664.38    220,536.06  11,044,200.44
S-1               N/A       N/A                  N/A        12,248.32       12,248.32       N/A             
R                 N/A       N/A                  N/A       161,232.90      161,232.90       N/A             
                                                                
TOTALS  200,000,000.00  200,000,000.00  29,334,908.45   9,067,433.07    38,402,341.52   170,665,091.55  4,660,536.06 175,325,627.61
                                                                
</TABLE>
                                                                
IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:  
                                                                
                                                                
                                                                
                                                                
                ANN MARIE JOSE             
                THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK 
                STRUCTURED FINANCE SERVICES
                450 WEST 33RD STREET, 15TH FLOOR
                NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10001 
                (212) 946-7148
# C_2005044EN.01000801.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3657 — Airbus/SITA)

(2005/C 44/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 January 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3657. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3657. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1273** 

KAREN DISHMAN POWELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00069

- jpj

- pms )

Submitted : November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinio n . Karen Dishman Powell, Appellant Pro Se. John W. Campbell, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Tampa, Florida; Robert P. Floyd, III, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in thi s circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Karen Dishman Powell appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea sons stated by the district court. Powell v. Sykes Enter s ., Inc. , No. 1:10

- cv - 00069

- jpj

- pms (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2011) . We deny Powell’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel y presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED