alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,632
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                     100
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              18,465
<PP&E>                                         1,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                22,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13,033
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          54
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  22,911
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              30,525
<CGS>                                         28,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 31,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (581)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.11)
        

</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation Water Management, Nutrient Management, Pond, Waste Treatment, Waste Treatment Lagoon.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111407 

ltJr" ~tt;Ktl IA NT KEYHOLE / BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEMS 

/i NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

22 September 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: TAGBOARD Operational Planning 

In response to your request of 13 August 1969, see Tab A, 

General Wheeler, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, has forwarded 

to the Secretary of Defense, see Tab B, a recommendation for early 

approval of a T AGBOARD mission over South China or an alternate 

mission over North Korea. 

The NRO Staff has provided USIB targets to the JCS for 

mission planning. Additionally, DIA and the Eastman Kodak Company 

have been advised of film processing and reproduction procedures. 

Recommend you forward the letter on the facing page to 

Mr. Packard, 

Attachments - 2 

1. Tab A, Memo, 13 Aug 69 

2. Tab B, Merr•n, 5 Sept 69 

EDWIN F. SWEE~ 

Colonel, USAF / i 

\ 

TAGBOARD HANDLE VIA coNr•oL No Internal 

BYEMAN /TALENT KEYHOLE CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 OIRECT1VE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111407 

COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

PAGE_~l~_ OF_~l,____ PAGES
# CA2005089EN.01000101.xml

| 13.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 89/1

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions:

EPSO/AD/4/04 to constitute a reserve of administrators (A*7) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of European public administration

EPSO/AST/2/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the fields of European public administration/human resources and financial management

EPSO/AST/3/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of Information Technology

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 317 A of 22 December 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 317 A of 22 December 2004

(2005/C 89 A/01)

On pages 6, 22 and 38, section A.II, point 3(c), last paragraph:

for:

for

‘After the closing date for applications, you may not change the languages in which you have specified that you wish to take the tests’;

read:

read

‘Should you note an error in the languages you choose for the different tests, you will be allowed to modify your choice up to three weeks preceding the date fixed for the tests’.

---
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2274 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for extended 

periods relating to preliminary permits and commencement of construction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2274 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HYdropower Permit 

3 Extension Act’’ or the ‘‘HYPE Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS OF PERIODS. 

5 (a) PRELIMINARY PERMITS.—Section 5 of the Fed6 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 798) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘three’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘four’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘Commission may extend 

11 the period of a preliminary permit once for not 

12 more than 2 additional years beyond the 3 

13 years’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Commis14 sion may— 

15 ‘‘(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit 

16 once for not more than 4 additional years beyond 

17 the 4 years’’; 

18 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

19 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(2) if the period of a preliminary permit is ex22 tended under paragraph (1), extend the period of 

23 such preliminary permit once for not more than 4 

24 additional years beyond the extension period granted 

25 under paragraph (1), if the Commission determines 
3 

•HR 2274 EH

1 that there are extraordinary circumstances that war2 rant such additional extension.’’. 

3 (b) TIME LIMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT

4 WORKS.—Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

5 806) is amended in the second sentence by striking ‘‘once 

6 but not longer than two additional years’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘for not more than 8 additional years,’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2274 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for exother purposes. and commencement of construction, and for tended periods relating to preliminary permits
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<CASH>                                       3,265,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,854,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,593,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 28,283,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,709,000
<PP&E>                                       6,619,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,076,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,699,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,029,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,087,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,699,000
<SALES>                                     60,579,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,579,000
<CGS>                                       46,662,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,699,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,441,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,741,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,622,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,622,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Review Plan for the Review of an Application for a Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility (NUREG-1718)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1718            - Part 1: Cover through Chapter 9 (PDF - 2.04 MB)
          - Part 2: Chapter 10 through Appendix I (PDF - 2.46 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 2000**Date Published:**August 2000

**Prepared by:** Fuel Manufacturing Branch Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This Standard Review Plan (SRP) (NUREG-1718) provides guidance to the NRC staff reviewers in the Office of the Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards who will perform safety, safeguards, and environmental reviews of the anticipated application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for a mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility under 10 CFR Part 70. This guidance includes the construction approval review specifically related to plutonium processing and fuel fabrication. The SRP ensures the quality, uniformity, stability, and predictability of the staff reviews. It presents a defined basis from which to evaluate proposed changes in the scope and requirements of the staff reviews. The SRP makes information about the NRC acceptance criteria widely available to interested members of the public and regulated industry. Each SRP section addresses the responsibilities of persons performing the review, the review areas, the Commission's regulations pertinent to specific technical matters, the acceptance criteria used by the staff, how the review is accomplished, and the conclusions that are appropriate for the Safety Evaluation Report for both the construction approval review and the license review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                       416
<INVENTORY>                                      3,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,333
<PP&E>                                           8,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,306
<SALES>                                         24,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,795
<CGS>                                           13,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.73)
        

</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2022

Start

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Soils amended with carbon based material 

derived from plant residues or treated animal 

byproducts that are optimized for the site. 

D.2 (+) Soil water 

holding capacity 

C.5 (+) Water 

quality and 

aquatic habitats

I.11 (-) Sheet 

and rill erosion

Initial setting: On all land uses where 

there is a need to improve soil conditions.

D.1 (+) Soil D.4 (-) Bulk density

organic matter 

C.1 (+) Air 

quality in the 

airshed

C.4 (+) Water quantity

available for other uses

C.3 (+/-) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.3 (+) Plant 

growth, vigor, 

establishment, or 

production 

I.1 (+) Soil health

D.5 (+) Cost of 

application 

I.2 (+) Carbon 

sequestration

I.4 (+) 

Potential 

income

Soil Carbon Amendment

(336)

I.13 (+) Preservation 

of infrastructure;

(-) community costs

I.5 (+/-) Net 

returns

I.9 (+/-) 

Irrigation water

I.10 (-) Runoff

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

Pathway

Nutrient Management (590)

D.3 (+/-) Nutrient 

dynamics

I.6 (-) 

Pest/pathogen 

infestations

I.7 (-) Management time 

required by farmer

Critical Area Planting (342)

I.8 (+) Infiltration I.14 (+) Vendor 

income

C.6 (+) 

Business 

support 

infrastructure

C.2 (+) 

Ecosystem 

services

I.12 (-) Downlsope 

sediment deposition

Irrigation Water 

Management (449)

Nutrient Management 

(590)
# DO T -o^.^-i^°\° { - (^^^' ^
& u s Deoartmen t ' ' ^"•'•''^FAtr'
. ' Assistan t Secretar y120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue
. S E u.b.ueparrmen i ,. , -.[•.i//-.n^-^^- ; , Washington , DC2059 0 o f Transportatio n . ; UiYr v1 L i MA R ^ 1 201 1 Offic e of th e Secretar

y of Transportatio n ; • i'; n ^ q A fj : S 2



### Th e Honorabl e Luine l Torre s Acost a Forme r Secretary 2006-200 9 Sout hPuert o Ric o Commerc e Chambe r Sa n Felip e 10 1 Sant aElen a3 Guayanilla , P R00656-142 5 Dea r Mr . Torres : Thank yo u for you r Februar y 2 4 lette r

regardin g assistanc e t o th e Mercedit aAirpor t unde r th e Essential Ai r

Service (EAS ) program . A s yo u probabl y know . Ponc e ha s formall y appealed'th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation' s decisio n t o rel y o n JetBlue' s subsidy-fre e servic e t o th e mainlan dan dno t

t o rene w Cap e Air' s EA S contract . W e ar e currentl y evaluatin g th e merit s o f th e community' s appeal . A s i s norma l practice , w e ar e placin g acop y o f you r lette r an dthi s respons e i n th e Docket , whic h i s availabl e for publi c viewin g a

t www.reeulations.go v b y enterin g DOT-OST-1999-659 2 i n th e searc h field. I f I ca n provid e furthe r

informatio n o r

assistance , pleas e feel fre e t o cal l me . Sincerel y yours .

Susan L . Kurlan d Assistan t Secretary for Aviatio n andInternationa l Affair sSIO- I l()3()S-{)ri( )

Februar y 24 , 20 n Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretary of

Transponatio n Unite dState s Depanmen t of Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Washington . D C 2059 0 Re : Termiaatio n o f EA S Progra m i n MerceditaAirport

Ponce , Puert o Ric o Dea r Miste r LaHood : I a mwritin g thes e fe

w word s t o le t

yo u kno w m y concer n abou t th e terminatio n of

th e subsid y give n t o th e Mercedit aAirpor t i n th e Cit y o f

Ponce , Puert o Rico , throug hth e Essential Ai r

Servic e Progra m(EAS) . A s atrade r i n th e sout hare ao f

th e islan dthi s wil l affect directl y t o th e econom y o f th e entir e zone . Th e Airpo n help s u s a s an a dho c airport , bu t

als o help s th e touris mi n th e south , east , an d cenCta l atieao f th e Island . Mercedit ai s th e fastes t way t o connec t

wit hPuert o Rico' s capital , Sa

n Juan . I t i s als o essentia l tha t

schedul e ai r

service , includin g bot hpassenge r an d cai^o , betwee n Ponc e an dSa n Jua n continue , Puert o Ric o ha s auniqu e geographi c characteristic s an dcultura l tie s t o th e Caribbea n an d Lati n America . Th e continuit y o f internationa l ai r

service s fro mal l th e serviceabl e point s i n th e islan di s essential t o th e cultura l an deconomi c growt ho f th e region . Th e terminatio n o f

th e subsid y woul dimpl y th e dismissal o f th e airpor t

employee s increasing unemploymen t

percentag e i n Puert o Rico . A s citize n of

th e sout hregio n o f

Puert o Rico , I urg e tha t Mercedit aAirpor t

continu e i

n th e EA S platform . Sincerely , LuinefTorre s Acost a Forme r Secretary 2006-200 9 SouthPuert o Ric o Commerc e Chambe r Sa n Fehp e 10 1 Sant aElen a3 Guayanilla , P.R . 00656-142 5 Luincl2004<®ya

hoo.co m
Exhibit 13(a)


                                906 Certification



                                                June 23, 2005



               The certification set forth below is being submitted to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual
          Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
          "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
          15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")
          and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
          This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Exchange
          Act and does not constitute a part of the Report accompanying this
          letter.

               Jason C.S. Chang, the Chief Executive Officer and Freddie Liu,
          the Chief Financial Officer of ASE Test Limited, each certifies that,
          to the best of his knowledge:

               1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

               2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of ASE Test Limited.



                                          /s/ Jason C.S. Chang
                                          -----------------------------
                                         Name: Jason C.S. Chang
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer





                                          /s/ Freddie Liu
                                          -----------------------------
                                         Name: Freddie Liu
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (J Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        - Japan Nuclear Accident – Related FOIAs
        - Job Opportunities with the NRC (See  Career Opportunities )

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, September 01, 2021
# C_2005069EN.01000401.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/4

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 14 December 2004

in Case C-1/04 SA Tertir-Terminais de Portugal SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)

(2005/C 69/08)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-1/04 SA: application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities brought on 15 March 2004 by Tertir-Terminais de Portugal SA, established in Terminal do Freixieiro (Portugal), (represented by G. Vandersanden, C. Houssa, L. Lévi and F. Gonçalves Pereira, lawyers) against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: I. Martinez del Peral Cagigal and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart) – the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Borg-Barthet, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), J. Malenovský and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar; has made an order on 14 December 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Tertir-Terminais de Portugal SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tertir-Terminais de Portugal SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
Opinion issued December 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00429-CV

———————————

MARYLIN J. TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

STEVEN PHUONG DUONG, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2020-09342

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marylin J. Taylor, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. No 

other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). And, although the motion does not include a certificate of 
2

conference, more than ten days have passed and no party has opposed appellant’s 

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Lloyd and Kelly.