alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

CHANNELL COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

December 31, 2004

 

Subsidiaries included in the2004 consolidated financial statements of the Company are:

 
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **Percentage of**       | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **Voting Power**        | ** ** |
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **Held by the Company** | ** ** |
| Canada:                                        |       |                    |       |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Channell Commercial Canada Inc.                |       | 100                     | %          |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| United  Kingdom:                               |       |                    |       |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Channell Commercial Europe Limited             |       | 100                     | %          |
| AC Egerton Limited                             |       | 100                     | %          |
| Channell Limited                               |       | 100                     | %          |
| Fibercast Limited                              |       | 100                     | %          |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Asia/Pacific:                                  |       |                    |       |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Channell Proprietary Limited                   |       | 100                     | %          |
| Channell Limited                               |       | 100                     | %          |
| Channell Bushman Pty Limited                   |       | 75                      | %          |
| Bushman Group Pty Limited                      |       | 75                      | %          |
| Australian Bushman Tanks Pty Limited           |       | 75                      | %          |
| Polyrib Tanks Pty Limited                      |       | 75                      | %          |
| Bushman Engineering Pty Limited                |       | 75                      | %          |
| Channell Commercial Malaysia Sendirian  Berhad |       | 100                     | %          |
| Channell Hong Kong Limited                     |       | 100                     | %          |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Mexico:                                        |       |                    |       |
|                                           |       |                    |       |
| Channell de Mexico SA de CV                    |       | 51                      | %          |

 

----
# C_2004273EN.01002302.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/23

---

Action brought on 22 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-402/04)

(2004/C 273/43)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Knut Simonssen, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 establishing harmonised requirements and procedures for the safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers (1), and in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 establishing harmonised requirements and procedures for the safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers (1), and in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period allowed for the transposition of the Directive expired on 5 August 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 13, 16.01.2002, p. 9.

1

---
# C_2005006EN.01000301.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 28 October 2004

in Case C-185/02 Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Waste management - Disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls - Directive 96/59/EC)

(2005/C 6/04)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-185/02 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: A. Caeiros) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes, M. Telles Romão and M.J. Lois) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 17 May 2002 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthert, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to communicate the plans and outlines referred to in Article 11 of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB and PCT) to the Commission of the European Communities within the prescribed period, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that provision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to communicate the plans and outlines referred to in Article 11 of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB and PCT) to the Commission of the European Communities within the prescribed period, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that provision;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Portuguese Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Portuguese Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180 of 27.7.2002

1

---
----

Notice of invitation to tender for refunds on barley exported to certain third countries

(2004/C 253/04)

I.   SUBJECT

II.   TIME LIMITS

III.   TENDERS

IV.   SECURITY FOR TENDER

The security for tender must be made out in favour of the competent authority concerned.

V.   AWARD OF CONTRACTS

The award will:

----

(1)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(3)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p.10.

----
yearIDsourceTypeIDsourceTypePopulation

2006 11 14694.49727 2006 21 407786.9235 2006 31 130335.4416 2006 32 43542.79543 2006 41 469.8370962 2006 42 259.8546936 2006 43 3236.854043 2006 51 258.2605419 2006 52 14762.21929 2006 53 1595.419827 2006 54 3351.057452 2006 61 2885.41186 2006 62 3108.443931
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17
                                                                   -------------

                                   Description
                                       Of
                    Long-Term Incentive Compensation Program
                        Applicable to Executive Officers


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pegasus Communications
Corporation has established on June 6, 2003 a long-term incentive program (the
"Program") with respect to calendar year 2003, whereby participating officers
would be granted restricted stock awards under the Pegasus Communications
Restricted Stock Plan. The number of shares to be granted will be based upon the
aggregate amount of short-term incentive earned by the officer with respect to
calendar year 2003 pursuant to the Pegasus Communications Corporation Short-Term
Incentive Plan (Corporate, Satellite and Business Development) for calendar year
2003 (the "STI Plan") (See Exhibit 10.15 and 10.16 to this Form 10-K for
information relating to the STI Plan). The number of shares to be issued will be
calculated by taking the aggregate amount of short-term incentive paid to the
officer under the STI Plan with respect to calendar year 2003 and dividing it by
$26.42, the closing price of Pegasus' Class A common stock on the day prior to
the Program being adopted. Shares will be issued in the first quarter of 2004
after (i) a determination of the final amount of aggregate short-term incentive
earned with respect to calendar year 2003 and (ii) formal action taken by the
Compensation Committee to grant the shares. If and when granted, the restricted
stock award will be 50% vested upon the date of grant. An additional 25% will
vest on the first and second anniversaries from the date of grant.
Conservation Practice Overview 

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

October 2017 

Natural Resources Conservation Service

CPS Dam (Code 402) 

A dam is an artificial barrier that can impound water for 

one or more beneficial purposes.

Practice Information

One purpose of a dam is to temporarily store runoff from 

heavy storms, reducing flood damage downstream by 

controlling the release rate of flood flows. These 

structures may also permit the use of more economical 

channel modifications and other downstream works of 

improvement.

This practice requires a very thorough site investigation to assure the following:

• Topographic, geologic, and soil conditions are satisfactory for the construction, operation, and

maintenance of the structure(s).

• Conservation treatment above the proposed structure is satisfactory so that sediments in the

runoff will not be excessive.

• Environmental impacts are accounted for in the overall plan.

Dams constructed as floodwater-retarding structures are normally part of a watershed plan sponsored 

by an organized group of local people with a vested interest in the natural resources of a specific 

watershed.

The dam will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice.

Common Associated Practices

A Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Dam (Code 402) is commonly applied with CPSs such as 

Grade Stabilization Structure (Code 410) and Dike (Code 356). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,484,977
<SECURITIES>                                 8,964,721
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,232,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (655,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,688,465
<PP&E>                                       7,568,617
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,964,923)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,523,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,569,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,269
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,376,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,523,804
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,651,202
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,212,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,946,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (43,958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (14,519,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,155,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,675,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,675,169)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.84)


</TABLE>
# C_2004273EN.01000701.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 September 2004

in Case C-411/02: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Incorrect transposition - Directive 98/10/EC - Telecommunications - Concepts of ‘a basic level of itemised billing’ and ‘still more detailed presentation’)

(2004/C 273/12)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-411/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 18 November 2002, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Schmidt and M. Shotter) v Republic of Austria (Agents: E. Riedl and T. Kramler) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by opting for billing which lists charges only according to the type of charge and is not sufficiently detailed to ensure effective verification and control by the consumer, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(2) of Directive 98/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for telecommunications in a competitive environment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by opting for billing which lists charges only according to the type of charge and is not sufficiently detailed to ensure effective verification and control by the consumer, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(2) of Directive 98/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for telecommunications in a competitive environment;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.

1

---
# C_2004118EN.01004103.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 23 January 2004

in Case T-248/03 Société de Produits Nestlé SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Amicable settlement - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 118/90)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-248/03: Société de Produits Nestlé SA, established in Vevey (Switzerland), represented by J.-J. Evrard, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto and I. de Medrano Caballero), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being: Grupo Kalise Menorquina SA, established in Palau de Plegamans (Spain) – application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 April 2003 (Case R 732/2001-2) relating to opposition proceedings – the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 23 January 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 4.10.2003

1

---
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

# R E

# cE,

# v ED DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## FEB**~·** 

## - OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## 0620!7

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## H ' EARING DOCKET
In the Matter of: William A. Curtright DocketNo. FAA-2015-1319 FAA Case No. 2014NM090046 Judge J. E. Sullivan

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

To: Judge Sullivan and Respondent: Notice is hereby given that counsel will be unavailable the following dates in2017: April!!, 12, 17, 18; May 22 through June 8, inclusive; July 11 through July 21, inclusive; September 21, 22; October 5,6,12,13, inclusive; for the complainant inthe above-captioned case. It is respectfully requested thatno hearings be scheduled during this period. David F. Shayne Attorney Enforcement Division, Western Team 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, W A 98057 Email: david.f.shavne@faa.gov Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) (425) 227-2165 (direct) (425) 227-1007 (fax) Please address all further correspondence regarding this matterto the above address.**Resp~** .. 

### tftt11y submitted, 7\ 

### J / .-r··· I ( / l/.

# D~S~YNE FAAAttorney

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been served this date, to the following:

Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Fax 202-267-1293 (facsimile and Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested)

William A. Curtright P.O. Box 1350 Jefferson, OR 97352 Fax: 503-485-0812 Email: ames(iil,amesresearch.com (Facsimile, Email, and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested)

Honorable 

### I.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Bldg., Ground Floor, Room Ell-310 Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested)

Dated: 

## FEB 02 2017

Legal Technician Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division- Western Team Renton, WA

DAVID F. SHAYNE, FAAATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
# C_2005057EN.01002402.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/24

---

Removal from the register of Case C-307/04 P (1)

1

(2005/C 57/41)

(Language of the case: English)

(Language of the case: English)

By order of 25 November 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-307/04 P: SEC Corporation v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 25.09.2004.

1

---
# C_2005006EN.01000901.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-420/02: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Unlawful deposit of waste at the ‘Pera Galini’ site - Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC - Articles 4 and 9)

(2005/C 6/14)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-420/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 21 November 2002, between Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Konstantinidis) and Hellenic Republic (Agent: E. Skandalou) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), K. Lenaerts, S. von Bahr and K. Schiemann, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take the necessary measures to ensure that waste deposited at the ‘Pera Galini’ site in the prefecture of Heraklion will be recovered or disposed of without endangering human health, without risk to water, air, soil, plants and animals and without causing a nuisance through noise or odours, and by granting a permit to operate that installation which does not contain the necessary information, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 9 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take the necessary measures to ensure that waste deposited at the ‘Pera Galini’ site in the prefecture of Heraklion will be recovered or disposed of without endangering human health, without risk to water, air, soil, plants and animals and without causing a nuisance through noise or odours, and by granting a permit to operate that installation which does not contain the necessary information, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 9 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Cover, Critical Area Planting, Diversion, Fence, Filter Strip, Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Mulching, Nutrient Management, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.