alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004147EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2004

(2004/C 147/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0893 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5276 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,22 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1993 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9475 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5844 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,625 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6576 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4254 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6455 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 766 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,03 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,99 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 831 286 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6611 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5122 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9291 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,072 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2198

JPY

Japanese yen

133,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66475

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0893

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5276

ISK

Iceland króna

87,22

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1993

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9475

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5844

CZK

Czech koruna

31,625

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6576

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4254

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6455

ROL

Romanian leu

40 766

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,03

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,99

TRL

Turkish lira

1 831 286

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6611

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5122

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9291

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,072

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,9345

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005063EN.01001202.xml

| 15.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3621 — SAGEM/SNECMA)

(2005/C 63/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3621. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3621. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00346-CV

HEALTHCORE SYSTEM 

MANAGEMENT, LLC

APPELLANT

V.

NHON NGUYEN MD, ANH NONG 

MD, INC., NHON THI NGUYEN, 

AND ANH THE NONG

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On November 16, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk 

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that 

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record 

and provided this court with proof of payment. 

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s 

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want 

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: December 23, 2010
## CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 1 I. GENERAL
District: Monterey Bay Unified APCD Date Adopted: 4/20/05
Rule No: Rule 903 Regulation Title: Inspection of Public Records - Disclosure Procedure Date Submitted To ARB: 2/23/05 Date Last Amended or Revised: 3/8/84 Pollutants Regulated By This Rule (Check): NOx SO2 PM10 VOC

_ TAC (Name of TAC)
Is this rule intended to be sent to the EPA as a SIP revision ? X Yes No. SUMMARY OF RULE CHANGES: New rule ? Amended rule Rule Repealed.

II. NET EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Increase Decrease X No change N/A Emissions reduction commitment in SIP for this source category: 0.0 tons/year SCC/CES Code(s) Affected: na Affected SIC Code(s): na Inventory Year to Calculate Changes in Emissions: na Affected Area:
Future Year Control Profile Estimate ( VOC emissions): N/A Tons/Year Baseline Reductions Tons/year Control Percent Control Control Year (increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Level Factor

N/A / = * 100 = % 1.00 - =

/ = * 100 = % 1.00 - = / = * 100 = % 1.00 - =

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS District is: Attainment Nonattainment X Split Approximate number of minor (<100 TPY) sources controlled by rule: na

. Percent in nonattainment area: na

. Number of major ( ? 100 TPY) sources controlled: NONE

. Percent in nonattainment area: 0%

## CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 2 Location of Major Sources by City: N/A

IV. EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY N/A
Does rule include emission limits that are continuous? Yes; X No. If yes, those limits are in Section(s) N/A of the rule. Other methods in the rule for achieving emissions reductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The rule contains: 1) Emission limits in Section(s) N/A

. 2) Work practice standards in Section(s) na

. 3) Record keeping requirements in Section(s) na

. 4) Reporting requirements in Section(s) na

.

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN X No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts Attainment DISCUSSION:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2274 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for extended periods relating 

to preliminary permits and commencement of construction, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2017 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for extended 

periods relating to preliminary permits and commencement of construction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HYdropower Permit 

5 Extension Act’’ or the ‘‘HYPE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS OF PERIODS. 

7 (a) PRELIMINARY PERMITS.—Section 5 of the Fed8 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 798) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2274 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘three’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘four’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘Commission may extend 

5 the period of a preliminary permit once for not 

6 more than 2 additional years beyond the 3 

7 years’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Commis8 sion may— 

9 ‘‘(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit 

10 once for not more than four additional years beyond 

11 the four years’’; 

12 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

13 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) if the period of a preliminary permit is ex16 tended under paragraph (1), extend the period of 

17 such preliminary permit once for not more than four 

18 additional years beyond the extension period granted 

19 under paragraph (1), if the Commission determines 

20 that there are extraordinary circumstances that war21 rant such additional extension.’’. 

22 (b) TIME LIMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT

23 WORKS.—Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

24 806) is amended in the second sentence by striking ‘‘once 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2274 IH

1 but not longer than two additional years’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘for not more than eight additional years,’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02169]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 2, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Citizens National Corporation, Wisner, Nebraska; to acquire up 
to an additional 0.16 percent, for a total of 35.36 percent, of the 
voting shares of Republic Corporation, and thereby acquire United 
Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 30, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-02169 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2004273EN.01003602.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/36

---

Action brought on 27 August 2004 by SmithKline Beecham p.l.c. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-356/04)

(2004/C 273/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 27 August 2004 by SmithKline Beecham, Brentford, (United Kingdom) represented by Dr V. von Bomhard, Dr A. Renck, Dr A. Pohlmann and I. Fowler, lawyers.

Warner-Lambert Consumer Healthcare S.Com.p.a. Milan, (Italy) was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 June 2004 in Case R0018/2004-1 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 June 2004 in Case R0018/2004-1

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | SmithKline Beecham p.l.c. |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark concerned: | Word mark ACTIFAST for goods and services in class 5 (pharmaceutical applications) — application number OHMI 1 902 568 |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Warner-Lambert Consumer Healthcare S. Com.p.a. |
| Trade mark or sign cited in opposition: | National word mark ACTIFED for goods and services in class 5 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition rejected |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal allowed, opposition allowed, registration denied |
| Pleas in law: | Violation of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 40/94 |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

SmithKline Beecham p.l.c.

Community trade mark concerned:

Word mark ACTIFAST for goods and services in class 5 (pharmaceutical applications) — application number OHMI 1 902 568

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Warner-Lambert Consumer Healthcare S. Com.p.a.

Trade mark or sign cited in opposition:

National word mark ACTIFED for goods and services in class 5

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal allowed, opposition allowed, registration denied

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 40/94

---
HomeNuclear SecurityInformation SecurityNRC's Declassification Program

# Contact Us About the NRC's Declassification Program

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) welcomes your input regarding all aspects of the agency's Declassification Program. If you have opinions regarding the types of information that should be prioritized for declassification, or if you have any other declassification-related comments or questions, please send us an email message by completing this form.

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 08, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-12-2015]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Greater Metropolitan Area Foreign Trade Zone Commission, grantee of FTZ 119, requesting subzone status for the facility of MAT Industries, LLC, located in Springfield, Minnesota. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on January 29, 2015.

The proposed subzone (4.8 acres) is located at 118 Rock Street West in Springfield, Minnesota. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 119. A notification of proposed production activity at the facility has been docketed and is being processed separately (B-75-2014).

In accordance with the Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.

Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is March 16, 2015. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to March 31, 2015.

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the “Reading Room” section of the Board's Web site, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*                     For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-2350.                

Dated: January 29, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02196 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2005011EN.01000702.xml

| 15.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3633 — Alcadis/Isuzu/Mitsubishi/Isuzu Benelux JV)

(2005/C 11/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3633. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3633. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 12.1
 DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
(in thousands, except ratios)
 Nine MonthsEnded September 30, 2008Income from continuing operations, less preferred distributions
    
    $
    23,534Preferred distributions
    
    
    53,038Interest expense
    
    
    143,657Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    220,229Interest expense
    
    $
    143,657Interest costs capitalized
    
    
    42,549Total fixed charges
    
    $
    186,206Preferred distributions
    
    
    53,038Total fixed charges and preferred distributions
    
    $
    239,244Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.18Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
distributions
    
    
    N/A
# C_2004284EN.01003001.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/30

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-224/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 284/58)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 16 September 2004, the President of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-224/02, Miguel Forcat Icardo v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ L 247 of 12.10.2002.

1

---
#### Gordon Lumber & Supply Company, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Neergaard and another, Appellants, Gordon and others, Defendants and Respondents.

For the appellants: *Joseph L. Gottschlich,*attorney, and *Robert V. Zens*of counsel, both of Kenosha.

For the respondent Gordon Lumber & Supply Company: *Judson W. Staplekamp*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*

Judgments affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 4, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                          91,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,653
<INVENTORY>                                     47,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,092
<PP&E>                                          24,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,961
<BONDS>                                             10
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                     245,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,905
<SALES>                                        131,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,468
<CGS>                                           76,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        


</TABLE>