alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Conservation Practice Standard Overview

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

September 2016

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Critical Area Planting (Code 342)

Critical area planting establishes permanent vegetation on 

sites that have, or are expected to have, high erosion 

rates, and on sites that have conditions that prevent the 

establishment of vegetation with normal practices.

Practice Information

Erosion control is the primary consideration for plant 

material selection. However, a broad choice of grass, 

trees, shrubs, and vines are usually available and adapted for most sites. Wildlife and beautification 

are additional considerations that influence planning decisions on a site needing this practice.

Conservation benefits may include, but are not limited to—

• reduced sheet and rill erosion

• reduced transport of sediment 

• stabilized slopes, road banks, stream banks, shorelines, sand dunes

The following decisions must be made when planning this practice:

• species of plants to establish

• methods and rates of planting

• fertilizer and soil amendments necessary for establishment and growth

• mulching requirements

• planting site preparation

• irrigation requirement

• site management following establishment of the vegetation

Common Associated Practices

Installation of practices such as Diversion (Code 362), Obstruction Removal (Code 500), Subsurface 

Drain (Code 606), or Underground Outlet (Code 620) may be necessary to prepare the area or 

ensure vegetative establishment.

Critical Area Planting (Code 342) is commonly applied with practices such as Mulching (Code 484), 

Nutrient Management (Code 590), and Herbaceous Weed Control (Code 315).

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2005082EN.01002101.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/21

---

Action brought on 3 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-63/05)

(2005/C 82/42)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 3 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Minas Konstantinidis, of the Commission's Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2002 relating to ozone in ambient air (OJ L 67 of 9.3.2002, p. 14) and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of such measures, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2002 relating to ozone in ambient air (OJ L 67 of 9.3.2002, p. 14) and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of such measures, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 9 September 2003.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 45935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18216]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Domestic Nuclear Detection Office; Announcement of Requirements 
and Registration for the National Radiological and Nuclear Detection 
Challenge; Correction

AGENCY: Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DNDO published a notice in the Federal Register of May 8, 
2013, to announce the National Radiological and Nuclear Detection 
Challenge (Rad/Nuc Challenge), a participation challenge being 
conducted under the America Competes Reauthorization Act, for state, 
local, and tribal law enforcement, other first responders, public 
safety officials, and Civil Support Team members. This event has been 
postponed requiring a change to the date and location information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Smith, (202) 254-7297, 
Radnucchallenge@hq.dhs.gov. To register for and find additional 
information about the Rad/Nuc Challenge, visit http://www.radnucchallenge.org.

Correction

    Correct FR Doc. 2013-10928 as follows:
    1. In the Federal Register of May 8, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-10928, 
on page 26795, in the second column, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: The Rad/Nuc Challenge will be held late in Fiscal Year 2014.
    2. On page 26795, in the second column, correct the ADDRESSES 
caption to read:

ADDRESSES: The location of the Rad/Nuc Challenge is to be announced.
    3. On page 26795, in the third column, correct the first sentence 
of the second full paragraph to read:
    The event will be hosted at a location to be announced.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 3719.

    Dated: June 17, 2013.
Rafael Borras,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2013-18216 Filed 7-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-9D-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.1
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Osprey Gold Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gordon Leliever, Principal Executive and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Gordon Leliever
    -------------------
Name:  Douglas A. Budden
     ---------------------
Principal Executive and Principal Accounting Officer
November 28, 2003




<PAGE>
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR
Submission of Transportation Conformity Budgets for the San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 SIP Plan Supplement

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V

– Criteria for Determining the Completeness
of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRA TIVE MATERIALS

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's Designee YES See letter from Richard Corey

, ARB Executive Officer

.

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption YES See enclosed ARB Resolution 1 5

- 39

.

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation YES See ARB Resolution 1 5

- 39

. 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan for ozone

c. C ontingency measures,

d. T ransportation control conformity budgets

c. V ehicle Miles T raveled offset demonstration

d. Reason ably Available Control Measure analysis YES Transportation conformit y budgets for

2018.

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements YES See ARB Resolution 1 5

- 39

.

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 YES See public noti ce and proof of publication in the ARB public notice published to web on

June 19 , 2015 at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/plan area/july_notice.pdf

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in

Accordance with Notice YES See A R B Resolution 1 5

- 39

.

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses YES T he re were no relevant public
comments for the ARB B oard adoption

. See Board Meeting Comment Log.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant NO Not applicable.

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status NO Not applicable.

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions NO Not applicable.

2.2(d) Demonstra tion that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS NO Not applicable.

2.2(e) Modeling Support NO Not ap plicable.

2.2(f)

- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification NO Not applicable.

S: \

TPB \ SHARED \ Transportation \ Conformity \ San Joaquin Valley \ EMFAC2014 v1.0.7 updates \ Submittal to USEPA \ SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist.docS: \ TPB \ SHARED \ Transportation \ Conformity \ San Joaquin Valley \ EMFAC2014 v1.0.7 updates \ Submittal to USEPA \ SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist.doc
# C_2005115EN.01000102.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 10 March 2005

in Case C-22/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te Rotterdam: Optiver BV and Others v Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten (1)

1

(Directive 69/335/EEC - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Duty on the gross profits of securities intermediaries)

(2005/C 115/02)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-22/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Rechtbank te Rotterdam (Netherlands), made by decision of 21 January 2003, received at the Court on 23 January 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Optiver BV and Others and Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten, successor in title to the Stichting Toezicht Effectenverkeer — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General, M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the levying on securities intermediaries of a duty, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on the gross profits from activities related to those securities.

---

(1)  OJ C 70 of 22.03.2003.

1

---
#### La Duc, Respondent, vs. Schuster, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Corrigan, Backus, Ruppa, Bortin & Backus*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Charles Quirk,*attorney, and *Robert E. Tehan*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004300EN.01000501.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 21 October 2004

in Case C-64/02 P: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Phrase DAS PRINZIP DER BEQUEMLICHKEIT - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 300/08)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-64/02 P: appeal under Article 49 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 27 February 2002, between Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl and G. Schneider), supported by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: P. Ormond, C. Jackson, M. Bethell and M. Tappin, assisted by D. Alexander), the other party to the proceedings being: Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH (Lawyers: S. von Petersdorff-Campen and H. von Rohr) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

1

---
Exhibit
31.4



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
Francis Ruchalski, certify that:



| | 1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of GlassBridge Enterprises, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| |    | Date:
    April 30, 2020                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              



| | /s/
    Francis Ruchalski                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | Francis
                                         Ruchalski
| | Chief
    Financial Officer                               
| | (Principal
    financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<NAME> WAXMAN USA INC.
<CIK> 0001014372
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (891)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,429
<PP&E>                                          13,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,787)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,106
<BONDS>                                         36,635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,573
<SALES>                                         81,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,360
<CGS>                                           59,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,765)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2005045EN.01001905.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/19

---

Removal from the register of Case C-345/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 45/39)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 29 November 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-345/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, de 20.9.03.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001004317
<NAME> IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                             522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,971)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,456
<PP&E>                                         331,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                (80,897)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,383
<BONDS>                                        443,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           293
<OTHER-SE>                                     340,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,706
<SALES>                                        281,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,064
<CGS>                                          141,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
APPENDIX F

Nonroad Sources

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection
This page blank for copying purposes.
# Air Resources Board Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 1001 I Street• P.O. Box2815 Mathew Rodriquez Sacramento, California 95812 www.arb.ca.gov Edmund G. Brown Jr. Secretaryfor Governor Environmental Protection

June 1,2015

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Perthe enclosed May 19, 2015 letterfrom the San Luis Obispo CountyAir Pollution Control District, the Air Resources Board (ARB) requests thatthe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) grantthe Eastern San Luis Obispo County nonattainment area (San Luis Obispo) a one-yearextension ofthe July 20, 2015, marginal attainment date forthe 0.075 ppm 8-hour ozone standard. Under Section 181 (a)(5) ofthe Clean AirAct, the U.S. EPAAdministrator may grant a one-year extension of an area’s attainment date iftwo conditions are met: the state has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable state implementation plan, and the 4th-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone value in the attainmentyear is 0.075 ppm or less. Attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone standard is based on a design value reflecting three years ofquality assured, complete and certified ambient airquality monitoring data. The three years to determine attainment ofthe July 2015 marginal attainment date are 2012, 2013, and 2014. As shown in Table 1, San Luis Obispo’s 2014 design value is above the 8-hour ozone standard and therefore does not qualifyfor attainment. However, the 4th-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone value in the 2014 attainmentyear is 0.073 ppm, consistentwith requirements for an attainment date extension. In a May 8, 2015, letterto U.S. EPA, ARB certified the 2014 monitoring data for San Luis Obispo. San Luis Obispo also complies with all state implementation plan requirements fora marginal nonattainment area.

The energychallenge facing California is real. Eve,y Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energyconsumption. Fora llstofsimple waysyou can reduce demand andcutyourenergycosts, see ourwebsite: http:/Iwww.arb.ca.gov.

California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled PaperMr. Jared Blumenfeld

June 1,2015 Page 2
Ifyou have any questions, please have yourstaff contact Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Planning and Science Division, at (916) 322-5350, orvia email at Karen.Magliano~arb.ca.gov. Sincerely,

Richard W. Corey Executive Officer Enclosures (2)
cc: Ms. Deborah Jordan, Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Air Division

— Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Ms. Nancy Levin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Air Division

— Region 9 Air Rules Office 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Mr. LarryAllen Air Pollution Control Officer San Luis Obispo CountyAir Pollution Control District 3433 Roberto Court San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division