alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004217EN.01001002.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 1 July 2004

in Case C-448/03: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 98/44/EC)

(2004/C 217/19)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-448/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: K. Banks) v French Republic (Agents: G de Bergues and A. Bodard-Hermant) — application for a declaration that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (OJ 1998 L 213, p. 13) or, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of that directive — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and F. Macken, Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of that directive.

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
# C_2005132EN.01002001.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/20

---

Action brought on 8 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Portuguese Republic

(Case C-163/05)

(2005/C 132/37)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Portuguese Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ramón Vidal Puig, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Directive 2002/7/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 February 2002 amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Directive 2002/7/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 February 2002 amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 9 March 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 67, p. 47.

1

---
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 West Virginia - Fiscal Year 2024
#### Stocker and another, Respondents, vs. Netherlands Fire & Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*December 5, 1916*

January *16, 1917.*

*Stocker v. Dubuque F. & M. Ins. Co., ante,*p. 614, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Outagamie county: Albert M. Spencer, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Gill & Barry,*and oral argument by *A. R. Barry.*

*Francis 8. Bradford,*for the respondents.

Kerwin, J.

This case is ruled by *Stocker v. Dubuque F. & M. Ins. Co., ante,*p. 614, 160 N. W. 1035.

*By the Court.*— Judgment is affirmed.
)Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101933nq U iJ.tu' 

t ! 

, C,,'''' DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE~ 

OFFIC:::: OF THE: CHIEF OF STAFF 

UNiTED STATES AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20330 

111I1I1~lIlllllllIllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ,140005021,OP 

::::;,,'O)::C':. :Sstablishn1ent of a Directorate ,of Space 1 February 1967 

(EXPIRES 1 May 1967) 

T,-); .0EPU':T3:':,s, DELEC:,'ORS AND CHIEFS OF COlv:PARABLE OFFICES (NO. 6 

A l'ece:rlt a:,"~:;:~aisal of our space efforts concluded that an irnprove-

.,":2::1t 0::: t:-::3 J>,ir }?O::::'C3 space posture could be achieved by establishing 

:".:::ana2>;::1~le:;:"t focal "::oint withi~ the Air Staff for space activities. , 

":,,erefo::>;:; I ::1ave directed the establishment of a Directorate of Space 

;:;",0 a major o::gao.'lizatiol1.al entity within the Deputy Chief of Staff, Research 

;;:_6 Development, effective 1 February 1967, Within this directorate will 

::'.:, concentrated the policy iorrnulation and planning support of the Air 

:Force space re search and development prograrns and the program control 

aLd management of the space developr::1ent projects, advanced space 

r . .:~nology programs, and space support activities. Space support 

;:::,::~i.vitics include the national ranges, control facilities, and launch 

Vehicles. 

". I i::~:6;::d. that the Directorate of Space shall be the focal point on space 

"_"_ i:ters w'ithi::r the Air Staff to include relations with NASA ane. other 

a: ~~lci~:,3 invo1.7ed in the National Space Program. ~~'--'----~--'--~-----If---

C#1213 

r 

.' 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101933
# C_2005106EN.01003201.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/32

---

Action brought on 17 February 2005 by Jörn Sack against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-66/05)

(2005/C 106/67)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17.02.2005 by Jörn Sack, Tervuren (Belgium), represented by U. Lehmann-Brauns and D. Mahlo, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decisions on the assessment of his remuneration from May 2004 to February 2005 due to a breach of the principle of equal treatment and reassess his remuneration for those months with due regard to that principle; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decisions on the assessment of his remuneration from May 2004 to February 2005 due to a breach of the principle of equal treatment and reassess his remuneration for those months with due regard to that principle;

| — | set aside the negative decision of the Director-General of the Directorate General for Administration of 26.11.2004 concerning the applicant's complaint of 21.6.2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the negative decision of the Director-General of the Directorate General for Administration of 26.11.2004 concerning the applicant's complaint of 21.6.2004;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was an official in the Legal Service of the Commission in grade A*14. Due to his special function within the Legal Service he applied for recognition as a middle manager with consequent entitlement to the increments prescribed in Articles 44(2) and 46 of the Staff Regulations and in Article 7(4) of Annex XIII thereto.

In support of his claim, the applicant argues that the decision rejecting his complaint was formally deficient in that it was drawn up exclusively in English, although the applicant's first complaint was written in German and that it infringed Article 253 EC by not addressing the wholly individual nature of his complaint.

The applicant further complains of an infringement of the general principle of equal treatment in the assessment and grading of his job. The applicant argues that his duties and responsibilities were on a par with those entrusted to the Head of Unit. The fact that his successor was granted higher-grade pay constituted a further infringement of the principle of equal treatment.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         150,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,821)
<INVENTORY>                                        356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,742
<PP&E>                                          85,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (17,037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,049
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,286
<SALES>                                          2,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,738
<CGS>                                            2,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   855
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (66,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (66,442)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (66,442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.38)
        

</TABLE>
ingsprimmul

4D FIL 3

Apritil • 1973

DAEMON GT ON D.C.

• OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

ING NOTICE

ACE SOUP

TOP-SEC-REF

1111040I• nee ableadmc 

ON 01111011111 UN Is SOU MS AP VI

lUs oi.lon‘t

-ter NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INTELLIGENCE)

SUBJECT: CIA U-2R Operations in the Gulf of Tonkin

REFERENCE: Attached Proposed lemo fm Hall to DepSecDef,

Same Subject

This office does not concur with the reference. The

penultimate paragraph of the advisory memorandum- from

Lt. General Davidson as well as the third paragraph of th

reference presume the necessity for continual operations

and such is not the basis for the proposed CIA fl'

At this time it has not been established that th

can produce imagery which contributes significant

particular intelli ence roblem. As considerable political

arrangements with maid be required and needless

logistics efforts such a transfer, it would seem

most appropriate for CIA to accomplish at least one good

flight before further consideration of the JCS proposal.

I am not sure if CIA really needs all of the support

now required of the field commander but as it has been

routinely supplied for fifteen years without a problem,

I do not see why it has now become unbearable. If it has

now become difficult, I suggest you review the support

requirements with CIA.

Attachment

•

ciAssesio re

DOM :RCM OLD

sonnute v'S rs:2

L.ZTION CATIOCT: 9. }

AISPOILIAACIILY 7.1

hipssia•fa :lepririge 

Islodive dem ae eveK, ens

IDEALIST

smiso
#### Mildred Feldschau, Respondent, vs. John Zpustcinski, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha county dated April 2, 1927: E. B. Belden, Judge.

Personal injuries. Automobile accident. Order in favoi of plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *George W. Taylor*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
# C_2004186EN.01000301.xml

| 21.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/3

---

Corrigendum to the non-opposition to a notified concentration — (Case COMP/M.3392 — WestLB/Klöckner)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 170 of 30 June 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 170 of 30 June 2004

(2004/C 186/03)

On page 2, the third sentence of the first paragraph:

for:

‘The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.’,

read:

‘The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.’

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DOUGLAS H. KEEVIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2740 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge. Douglas H. Keevis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
MORRIS, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
# C_2005019EN.01001707.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/17

---

Removal from the register of Case C-86/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 19/39)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 14 October 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-86/04: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 85 of 3.4.2004.

1

---
# C_2004190EN.01002001.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/20

---

(2004/C 190/33)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 179, 10.7.2004

OJ C 179, 10.7.2004

Past publications

OJ C 168, 26.6.2004

OJ C 156, 12.6.2004

OJ C 146, 29.5.2004

OJ C 106, 30.4.2004

OJ C 94, 17.4.2004

OJ C 85, 3.4.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
Dental Office Amalgam Recovery Program Annual Statement

The label here shows the information we have on record for your office. Due July 9, 2010

If incorrect, cross out and provide updated information to the right of the label. PLEASE SIGN BELOW 

 

 LABEL

Name,

ID No.

Address

Address

City, Zip

Responsible Dentist ________________________________________________________________ 

Contact Person (if different) ________________________________ Phone ___________________ 

AMALGAM SEPARATOR INFORMATION

Is the amalgam separator model in use in your office the same model as indicated on the most current 

installation form on file with the Minnesota Dental Association? Please check: Yes _____ No _____

If “No”, please provide the following information only if a new model has been installed:

Separator Manufacturer/Distributor _____________________________ Model Name/Number _____________

Serial Number _______________________________________________ Date Installed __________________ 

CERTIFICATION

I certify that our amalgam separator for treating vacuum system wastewater is being 

properly operated and maintained and that amalgam and other wastes are being 

managed in accordance with “Best Management Practices” (BMPs) and local, state, 

and federal requirements. For BMP’s, see page 11 of the MDA/MCES re: amalgam 

recovery booklet along with additional information on the MDA website at:

http://www.mndental.org/dentist_home/member_services/member_programs/amalgam_recovery_program/

Responsible dentist signature: _________________________________________ Date __________________

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Company(s) shipping waste amalgam and separator solids __________________________________________

Company(s) receiving waste amalgam and separator solids __________________________________________

Any concerns or comments on the operation of your separator _______________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

This statement is due July 9, 2010. Please sign and mail completed statement to:

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services

Industrial Waste & Pollution Prevention Section

390 Robert Street North

St. Paul, MN 55101-1805
# C_2005111EN.01000301.xml

| 11.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 May 2005

(2005/C 111/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2824 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1823 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5476 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,84 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,850 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1197 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 079 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,645 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7383 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6588 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5876 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9993 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7552 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1084 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 283,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8329 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6138 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 160,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,873 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,346 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,6460 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,704 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2824

JPY

Japanese yen

135,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1823

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5476

ISK

Iceland króna

82,84

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

29,850

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1197

ROL

Romanian leu

36 079

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,645

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7383

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6588

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5876

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9993

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7552

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1084

KRW

South Korean won

1 283,55

ZAR

South African rand

7,8329

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6138

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 160,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,873

PHP

Philippine peso

69,346

RUB

Russian rouble

35,6460

THB

Thai baht

50,704

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1171

To establish a moratorium on oil and gas-related seismic activities off 
     the coastline of the State of Florida, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mr. Nelson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a moratorium on oil and gas-related seismic activities off 
     the coastline of the State of Florida, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seismic Moratorium Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS-RELATED SEISMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE 
              EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF THE COASTLINE OF THE STATE OF 
              FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b) and 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may conduct 
geological or geophysical activities (as those terms are described in 
the final programmatic environmental impact statement of the Bureau of 
Ocean Energy Management entitled ``Atlantic OCS Proposed Geological and 
Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Planning 
Areas'' and completed February 2014) in support of oil or gas 
exploration and development in any area located within the exclusive 
economic zone (as defined in section 107 of title 46, United States 
Code) located off the coastline of the State of Florida.
    (b) Termination of Moratorium.--The moratorium described in 
subsection (a) shall only be terminated if the Administrator of the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration determines that the 
reasonably foreseeable impacts of the geological or geophysical 
activities described in subsection (a) to individuals or populations of 
marine mammals, sea turtles, or fish are minimal.
                                 <all>
```