alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.' 

roved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 

lOP vL 0rcr'T \t:. 

Iii 

n nr~D~ ~;'~j :~L; 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

·.C i~:~) , ! 

VlEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

SUBJECT: Successful TAGBOARD Test Flight, July 10, 1969 

On July 10, 1969, the TAGBOARD System was successfully flmJD over 

the Pacific Missile R-:mge by drone #520. This was the second consecuLve 

successful TAGBOARD launch. 

The drone was launched from the B-52 mother aircraft at 2156Z (1756 

EDT) without incident. The drone profile was from a launch point north 

of Kauai (Hnwaiian Islands) down range over enroute islands past ?1iJway, 

wi th a simi.lar return route and recovery of the hatch and payload in 1:,he 

vicini ty of KauaL 

The range was approximately 3,000 miles w:llich is less then fLlll r;ir'i;e 

of the drone but exactly as programlned for this flight. With the exc8iJtioL 

of momentary deviations while in prograrrL.'1led turns, the drone course 'das 

within two miles of course centerline. The rr13Ximum drone altitude was 

approximately 93,000 feet at termination fuel off. 

The hatch was recovered at 23502 (1950 EDT) by a JC-130 aircraft. 

The total drone flight to hatch ejection was 96 minutes. 

The above performance data is based on real time read-out. Fl<.rtn,,:r 

information will be available aftel' evalua Hon of the processed film c~r;6 

instrumentation data. 

CC: NRO Staff 

.'~:.::~, ~J . ~ .. L u'~l J 

\'- c-c~'~2!.~W. '. ~j\ RTt~)~ J R 

'\ '. t::;oJ.onel, uSAF 

~. Director, Program J 

'if r r~,~ .. ~ L:'''' "'!:; II'." . 

TOP SEeRS 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 

BYl:: ~230(~ 

Cy J. of J cys 

.Pg 1 of 1 pg
# C_2004239EN.01000702.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/7

---

Action brought on 27 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-327/04)

(2004/C 239/12)

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Huttunen and D. Martin, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply, with respect to the province of Åland (Ahvenanmaan maakunta), with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), or at least by not informing the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply, with respect to the province of Åland (Ahvenanmaan maakunta), with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), or at least by not informing the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | Order Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for implementing the directive expired on 19 July 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 180 of 19.7.2000, p. 22.

1

---
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ John P. Murray                                                                   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  | John P. Murray                                                                       |
|                 | Title: | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          94,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  738,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                   198,848
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               755,048
<PP&E>                                       1,164,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                 435,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,075,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,097,248
<BONDS>                                        961,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,894
<COMMON>                                         9,638
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,004,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,075,058
<SALES>                                      5,624,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,624,790
<CGS>                                        2,232,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,909,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               287,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,001,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,574,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,574,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,574,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
#### Mashak, Appellant, vs. Albrecht, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Wm. M. Gleiss*and *Masters & Hansen*all of Sparta.

For the respondent: *O. W. Sprecher*and *Z. S. Rice,*both of Sparta.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004298EN.01000201.xml

| 3.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/2

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2004/C 298/02)

Image

National side of the new EUR 2 commemorative circulation coin issued by the Republic of San Marino

National side of the new EUR 2 commemorative circulation coin issued by the Republic of San Marino

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. With a view to informing the parties professionally handling coins and the public at large, the Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1). In accordance with the relevant Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins under the condition that only a single new coin design at most is issued per country and per year and that the EUR 2 denomination is used. These coins correspond to the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative feature on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Republic of San Marino.

Issuing State

Commemorative feature: Bartolomeo Borghesi (historian, numismatist).

Commemorative feature

Factual description of the design: the twelve stars of the European Union positioned around the outer circle of the coin and the issuing year ‘2004’, positioned bottom centre, surround the bust of Bartolomeo Borghesi. To the left of the bust is the inscription ‘Bartolomeo Borghesi’, and one above the other are the letter ‘R’ and the engraver's initials ‘E.L.F.’. To the right of the bust is the word ‘San Marino’.

Factual description of the design

Issuing volume: maximum 110 000 coins.

Issuing volume

Approximate issuing period: December 2004.

Approximate issuing period

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for a reference to all national sides that have been issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38).

2

---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-81482) of Bruker AXS Inc. of our report dated
March 15, 2002, except as to Note 11 which is as of March 25, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 15, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.



Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
March 26, 2002

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                           OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                THREE MONTHS          THREE MONTHS          SIX MONTHS           SIX MONTHS
                                                    ENDED                 ENDED                ENDED                ENDED
                                                JUNE 30, 2003         JUNE 30, 2002        JUNE 30, 2003        JUNE 30, 2002
                                                -------------         -------------        -------------        -------------
<S>                                          <C>                   <C>                   <C>                <C>

Net income (loss)                                $(145,000)            $ 146,000              $(203,000)         $(1,694,000)
                                                =============         =============        =============        =============

Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic
-------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                       5,470,311              5,470,311             5,470,311            5,470,311
                                                =============         =============        =============        =============



Income (loss) per common share -
Basic                                             $   (.03)               $   .03              $   (.04)           $   (.31)

Income (Loss) Per Share - Diluted
---------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding during
the period                                       5,470,311              5,470,311             5,470,311            5,470,311


Effect of stock options dilution                         0                      0                     0                    0
                                                -------------         -------------        -------------        -------------


Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings                     5,470,311              5,470,311             5,470,311            5,470,311
                                                =============         =============        =============        =============


Income (loss) per common and common
equivalent share-Diluted                         $    (.03)               $   .03             $    (.04)           $    (.31)
                                                =============         =============        =============        =============



</TABLE>


                                       18
# C_2005106EN.01000401.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 1 March 2005

in Case C-377/02: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) in Léon Van Parys NV v Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (BIRB) (1)

1

(Common organisation of the markets - Bananas - GATT 1994 - Articles I and XIII - Framework agreement of 23 April 1993 between the EEC and the Cartagena Group - Direct effect - Recommendations and decisions of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects)

(2005/C 106/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-377/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Raad van State (Belgium), made by decision of 7 October 2002, received at the Court on 21 October 2002, in the proceedings between Léon Van Parys NV and Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (BIRB) — the Court: (Grand Chamber) composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, G. Arestis, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, J. Klučka and U. Lõhmus,, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General, M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 1 March 2005, in which it ruled:

| | In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, an operator may not rely in proceedings before a national court on the fact that Community legislation is incompatible with certain rules of the World Trade Organisation even where the Dispute Settlement Body referred to in Article 2(1) of the Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes, which forms Annex 2 to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation, approved by Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994), has declared that legislation to be incompatible with those rules. |
| --- | --- |

In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, an operator may not rely in proceedings before a national court on the fact that Community legislation is incompatible with certain rules of the World Trade Organisation even where the Dispute Settlement Body referred to in Article 2(1) of the Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes, which forms Annex 2 to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation, approved by Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994), has declared that legislation to be incompatible with those rules.

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 11.01.2003.

1

---
# C_2005132EN.01003501.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/35

---

Action brought on 31 March 2005 by Charlotte Becker and Others against the European Parliament

(Case T-139/05)

(2005/C 132/63)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 31 March 2005 by Charlotte Becker, residing in Manton (France), Seamus Killeen, residing in Sutton (Dublin), Robert Payne, residing in Terenure (Dublin), Deirdre Gallagher, residing in Terenure, Paul Van Raij, residing in Overveen (Netherlands), Wilhemus Van Miltenburg, residing in Huizen (Netherlands), represented by Georges Vandersanden, Laure Levi and Aurore Finchelstein, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the applicants' pension slips for May 2004, with the exception of Ms Gallagher's, with the effect of applying a weighting at the rate for the capital of their country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting such as will adequately reflect the differences in the cost of living between the places in which the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and thus corresponding with the principle of equivalence, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the applicants' pension slips for May 2004, with the exception of Ms Gallagher's, with the effect of applying a weighting at the rate for the capital of their country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting such as will adequately reflect the differences in the cost of living between the places in which the applicants are deemed to incur their expenditure and thus corresponding with the principle of equivalence,

| — | as regards Ms Gallagher, annul her payslip for May 2004, with the effect of applying a weighting to the allowance which she receives for being assigned to non-active service, fixed at the rate for the capital of the country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting such as will adequately reflect the differences in the cost of living in the place where the applicant is deemed to incur her expenditure and thus corresponding to the principle of equivalence; |
| --- | --- |

—

as regards Ms Gallagher, annul her payslip for May 2004, with the effect of applying a weighting to the allowance which she receives for being assigned to non-active service, fixed at the rate for the capital of the country of residence or, at the very least, a weighting such as will adequately reflect the differences in the cost of living in the place where the applicant is deemed to incur her expenditure and thus corresponding to the principle of equivalence;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants put forward the same pleas in law and arguments as those put forward in Case T-35/05.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET (SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (FEBRUARY 9 THROUGH
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                       474
<INVENTORY>                                     39,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,748
<PP&E>                                           9,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                     712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,486
<SALES>                                        529,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               529,232
<CGS>                                          454,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  513,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (564)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (223)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.21
        

</TABLE>
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL
CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF
AUTOMOBILE LOAN RECEIVABLES


The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and maintaining
the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of control procedures.  The objectives of an
internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but
not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from
unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in
accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Bank's
internal control structure based on the criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") relative to the servicing
of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trusts
Series 1995-2, 1996-1, 1996-2, 1997-1, 1997-2, 1997-3, 1997-4, 1998-1
and 1998-2 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of
September 30, 1999, and we have determined that the Bank maintained an
effective internal control structure over financial reporting relative
to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as
of September 30, 1999.

However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal
control structure, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an effective
internal control structure can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to reliability of financial statements and safeguarding and
management of assets.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of any internal
control structure can change with changes in circumstances.



_______________________		_________________________
Kevin B. Cashen	       		Larry C. Cain
Senior Vice President 	 	Senior Vice President



_______________________		__________________________
George P. Clancy, Jr.   		Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
Executive Vice President 	Executive Vice President and
	                       		Chief Financial Officer

October 20, 1999