alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005093EN.01000502.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/5

---

Action brought on 20 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-19/05)

(2005/C 93/10)

Language of the case: Danish

An action against the Kingdom of Denmark was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 20 January 2005 (fax 14.01.) by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by N. B. Rasmussen and G. Wilms, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to pay the Commission the sum of DKK 18 687 475 as own resources, together with default interest from 27 July 2000, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular Article 10 EC and Articles 2 and 8 of Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom (1) of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to pay the Commission the sum of DKK 18 687 475 as own resources, together with default interest from 27 July 2000, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular Article 10 EC and Articles 2 and 8 of Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom (1) of 31 October 1994 on the system of the European Communities' own resources;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The amount referred to in the application represents the duty that the Danish customs authorities omitted to collect in the period 1994-1997 from an undertaking wrongly permitted by the said authorities to import certain goods at zero rate. That permission was given as concerning goods intended for incorporation in or for fitting to or equipping ships, boats or other vessels in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (2) of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, Annex 1, Section II. The goods were, however, intended for the manufacture of containers and could not, as was later acknowledged by the Danish authorities, be covered by the said provision.

2

The Danish authorities have unlawfully failed to make the said amount available to the Commission as own resources. The claims made in this connection correspond to those made by the Commission in its application against Denmark in Case C-392/02 (3).

3

---

(1)  OJ L 293 of 12.11.1994, p. 9.

1

(2)  OJ L 256 of 7.09.1987, p.1.

2

(3)  OJ C 31 of 8.02.2003, p. 4.

3

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of B.W., A.W., and L.W., )

children. )

________________________________ )

)

C.W., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-553

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed June 20, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Kim Hernandez

Vance, Judge.

David A. Dee, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee Department of Children and

Families.

Jesse R. Butler, Dickinson & Gibbons,

P.A., Sarasota, and Thomasina Moore,

Sanford, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem

Program.
2

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date:        |  |                            
|May 14, 2010 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|             |  |                            
|             |  | John P. Manning            
|             |  | Principal Executive Officer
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Conservation Crop Rotation, Critical Area Planting, Diversion, Filter Strip, Heavy Use Area Protection, Obstruction Removal, Recreation Area Improvement, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Trails and Walkways, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Heinrich v. Pierer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SiemensAktiengesellschaft; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Reserved;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 29, 2004  /s/ HEINRICH v. PIERERHeinrich v. Pierer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00330]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Fusion Energy Sciences 
Advisory Committee. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: January 31, 2013--9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Gaithersburg, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 
20877.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edmund J. Synakowski, Designated 
Federal Officer, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences; U.S. Department of 
Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue SW.; Washington, DC 20585-1290; 
Telephone: (301) 903-4941.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: To complete the charge given to the 
Committee in the letter from the Director, Office of Science, dated 
April 13, 2012, to the FESAC Chair asking an assessment by FESAC of 
priorities among and within the elements of the magnetic fusion energy 
science program.
    Tentative Agenda:
     FES Perspectives, including Briefing on the new Facilities 
Prioritization Charge.
     Briefing on the final report from the Subcommittee on 
Magnetic Fusion Energy Program Priorities.
     Presentation on the EU Pathway/DEMO Studies.
     Discussions of the Report from the Subcommittee on MFE 
Program Priorities.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact 
Dr. Ed Synakowski at 301-903-8584 (fax) or 
Ed.synakowski@science.doe.gov (email). Reasonable provision will be 
made to include the scheduled oral statements during the Public 
Comments time on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will 
conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 45 days on the Fusion Energy Sciences 
Advisory Committee Web site at: http://www.science.doe.gov/ofes/fesac.shtml.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 4, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-00330 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 42929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Stark 
Bro's Nurseries & Orchards Co. of Louisiana, Missouri, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 13/506,771, ``APRICOT 
TREE `TWOCOT','' filed on May 16, 2012.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 19, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Stark Bro's Nurseries & 
Orchards Co. of Louisiana, Missouri has submitted a complete and 
sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license 
will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license 
may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this 
published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written 
evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license 
would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 
CFR 404.7.

Robert Griesbach,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-17244 Filed 7-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 23-24, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keary A Cope, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7190, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-2222,                         *copeka@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated:  February 4, 2015. 

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02599 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
*January 7, 1941.*

#### Kirchner (Sarah), Respondent, vs. Fairmont Ice Cream Company and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Bouck, Milton & Dempsey*of Oshkosh.

For the respondent: /. *E. O'Brien*of Fond du Lac, and *William J. Geenen*of Appleton.

*By the Court.-*

Judgment affirmed.
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14000504930 

August 20, 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

On July 19, Sgt Williams (AFXPPF) called and stated that the 

State/Defense message concerning foreign clearances for the 6594th 

Test Group aircraft had been sent to Wellington and Canberra. I 

obtained a copy (attached) from AFXPPF, and noted that a parenthetical 

phrase that might be troublesome had been added to the message on 

which we originally coordinated. I asked Major Stebbins (AFXPPF) to 

explain the rationale behind the inclusion of the parenthetical phrase. 

He stated that Lt Col Reilly (State - G/ PM) had requested the phrase be 

added as an attempt to explain the lack of informative details concerning 

the referenced programs. I told Maj Stebbins that the parenthetical 

phrase might present a problem depending on how the message is handled 

in Wellington and Canberra. 

Lt Colonel Yost and I discussed alternatives for ameliorating the 

effect of the State / Defense message, and we decided to sit tight and 

see what develops as a result of the State/Defense message. 

I informed Maj Stebbins of our decision and specifically requested 

that he not discuss with Lt Col Reilly our concern over the parenthetical 

phrase. He agreed, and will keep us apprised of the traffic on this 

subject. 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 07281 

! 

i 

i 

~ 

i 

! 

! 

I 

t~ 

I 

I 

-
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby
certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:    Joseph J. BouffardTitle:      President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2006By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:    Michael J. DeeTitle:      Chief Financial Officer and ControllerMay 12, 2006
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-88/04: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Failure to implement within the period prescribed)

(2005/C 45/21)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-88/04: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 23 February 2004, between Commission of the European Communities (Agent: K. Banks) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agents: R. Caudwell and K. Manji) – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 December 2004 in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35402-35403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14496]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority: 375]

Delegation of Authority to the Inspector General for the U.S. 
Department of State

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Inspector General 
for the U.S. Department of State, to the extent authorized by law, the 
authority under Section 61 of the State Department Basic Authorities 
Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2733), to waive the application of the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8344 or 8468 on a case-by-case basis, for the 
reemployment of annuitants in the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) 
under the Civil Service Retirement System and Federal Employees' 
Retirement System; provided that, the total number of annuitants to 
whom a waiver by the Inspector General under this delegation applies 
may not exceed 5 percent of the total number of full-time Civil Service 
employees in the OIG.
    This delegation of authority is not intended to revoke, amend, or 
otherwise affect the validity of any other delegation of authority.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary may at 
any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

[[Page 35403]]

    Dated: May 28, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-14496 Filed 6-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-42-P
```
*June 24, 1929.*

#### Poplowski, Respondent, vs. Ottavi, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bendinger & Hayes*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *C. F. Rouiller*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on October 8, 1929.