alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005010EN.01000401.xml

| 14.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3622 — Valeo/Engel)

(2005/C 10/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 10 January 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Valeo SA (‘Valeo’, France), acquires within the meaning of Article 3 (1) (b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole Engel Equipement SAS (‘Engel’, France, part of the Johnson Controls Group, USA), by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 10 January 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Valeo SA (‘Valeo’, France), acquires within the meaning of Article 3 (1) (b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole Engel Equipement SAS (‘Engel’, France, part of the Johnson Controls Group, USA), by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | Valeo: manufacture of automotive components, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

Valeo: manufacture of automotive components,

| — | Engel: manufacture of electronic control systems for automobiles. |
| --- | --- |

—

Engel: manufacture of electronic control systems for automobiles.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3622 — Valeo/Engel, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3622 — Valeo/Engel, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 March 2005

(2005/C 73/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### Murfree *v.*Redding.

Making a man master, and giving him command of a ship is, *ipso fade,*giving him power to take a load for freight in a foreign port's ;nd his contract in such case, binds the owner.

BiU b> Equity and answer. *Bedding*had recovered judgment against *Murfree*for a *negro*— Murfree com-*319plajfjp,]^ aJK] staled in ins bil], that *Redding hut)*put one *Scranton*on hoanl his brig. as master, and sent him viith a load from New hern to Murfreesborough, and that he had put the negro on board with him. and authorized *Scranton*to sell the negro. This the answer denied_ The bill further stated, that Scranton, whilst at Mur-freesborough, took in for freight a load of tar for him, and a *Mr. Figures;*and had never accounted for it; and that *Redding,*as owner, ought to be liable. The answer denied that *Scranton*ivas appointed master for any other or further purpose, than that of navigating the vessel from Newborn to Murfreesborough, and back, and if ho had taken in a load upon freight at Murfreesborough, he did it without, any authority or permission from him.

*Per curiam*

A master fias a right to make such contracts, and u'-ually is the person who does actually make them — the owners cannot be in every part where the ship goes to make them. The very making a man master, and giving him the command of the ship, is a giving him power to take a load for freight in a foreign port, or in a port at a distance from the place of the owner’s residence. His appearing as master, is enough for any man to contract with him upon the credit of his employer; and as it appears in the present case by the statement of *Redding*himself, that the cargo was lost by the attempt of *Scranton*to cross the bar without a pilot; and as the rule *respondeat superior,*is here applicable with great propriety, therefore let the injunction bedissolved as to all but the value of the load of tar ; and as to that, let it be continued until the bearing. Books *cited*—Moll. *b.*2, c. 1, s. 5 and 6. *Moll. b.*2, c. 2, *s.*14. 1 *Term Rep.*75, 78. *Lex. Merca.*95. *Sid.*411. 2 *Ch. C.*238.

*Note.*— Vide *Howard*v. *Ross, 2 Hay.*333.
*January 9, 1934.*

#### Clarkin, Respondent, vs. Seaman, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Sanborn, Blake & Aberg*and *Ernest PI. Pett,*all of Madison.

For the respondent: *Darrell MacIntyre,*attorney, and *Lester C. Lee*of counsel, both of Madison.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
#### THE STATE TO THE USE *OF*DOWDLE *vs.*B. WARD AL.

The case of *State v. King 8r at, 5*Ire.203, reviewed and the decision there made confirmed.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Cherokee County, at the Spring Term, 1841, his Honor Judge Pearson presiding.

This was an action of debt, brought at the instance of another relator, upon the same bond, which was sued upon in the case of the State upon the relation of John Hughes, decidedf at the December Term 1844, of this Court, and reported in 5 Ire. Rep. 203. The defendants pleaded *non est*factum, and upon the trial of the issues thereon joined, they raised several objections to the re*531covery of the relator, among which was one that the bond in question was never taken by any Court. The objections were all overruled by the presiding Judge, and the relator had a verdict and judgment, from which the defendant appealed.

*Francis,*for the plaintiff.

*J. W. Woodjin*and *Baxter,*for the defendants.

Battle, J.

For the reasons given by the Court in the case of the State upon the relation of Hughes against the same defendants as those now before us, 5 *Ire. Rep.*203, we deem the objection, that the bond was never taken by any Court, to be fatal to the relator’s right to recover in this action. The judgment must therefox-e be reversed and a *venire de novo*awarded.

Per Coriam. Judgment reversed and *venire de novol*

*534L
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-0799]

# AGENCY:

National Cemetery Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Wednesday January 28, 2015, The National Cemetery                               ( print page 6799)                            Administration (NCA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection Casket/Urn Reimbursement. This notice (FR Vol. 80, Number 18, January 28, 2015) was published in error; therefore this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2015-01581.                    

# DATES:

Withdraw FR notice published on Wednesday, January 28, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Crystal Rennie, Enterprise Records Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 632-7492.

FR Doc. 2015, published on January 28, 2015 (FR Vol 80, Number 18), is withdrawn by this notice.

Dated: February 3, 2015.

Crystal Rennie,

Department Clearance Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2015-02387 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,282
<INVENTORY>                                     31,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,308
<PP&E>                                          16,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,870
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,948
<SALES>                                        158,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           88,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (863)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
# South Carolina State Office

1835 ASSEMBLY ST STE 950COLUMBIASC29201-2448

803-253-3935

1835 ASSEMBLY ST STE 950COLUMBIASC29201-2448

South Carolina

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  South Carolina 
-  South Carolina State Office 

The USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service in South Carolina delivers programs under the guidance of State Conservationist, Ann English. The South Carolina State Office, located in Columbia, supports 37 NRCS field offices in two geographical areas. Contact your local field office for help.

## **Welcome to NRCS in South Carolina!**

### ***Ann English, State Conservationist***

South Carolina NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team. XXXX

----

**Reach out to someone in one of our Area offices.**

##   State Office and Leadership Team
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2125 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2125

   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any 
   estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint 
  Committee on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the 
                  public debt, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2017

   Mr. Brat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any 
   estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint 
  Committee on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the 
                  public debt, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Budgetary Accuracy in Scoring 
Interest Costs Act of 2017'' or the ``BASIC Act''.

SEC. 2. CBO AND JCT ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERVICING COSTS.

    (a) In General.--The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
section 402 the following:

              ``estimates to include debt servicing costs

    ``Sec. 403. Any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget 
Office under section 402, and any estimate prepared by the Joint 
Committee on Taxation, shall include, to the extent practicable, the 
costs (if any) of servicing the public debt.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402 the 
following:

``403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' MARCH 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,377)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,922
<PP&E>                                       1,423,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,418,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,410
<BONDS>                                        506,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     846,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,418,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,388
<CGS>                                           27,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.24
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Heinz-Joachim Neubürger, Chief Financial Officer of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
December 5, 2003

By:/s/ HEINZ-JOACHIM NEUBÜRGERName: Heinz-Joachim Neubürger
Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2005006EN.01000201.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 9 November 2004

in Case C-46/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vantaan käräjäoikeus): Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Oy Veikkaus Ab (1)

1

(Directive 96/9/EC - Legal protection of databases - Sui generis right - Definition of investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents of a database - Football fixture lists - Betting)

(2005/C 6/02)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-46/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Vantaan käräjäoikeus (Finland), by decision of 1 February 2002, received at the Court on 18 February 2002, in the proceedings between Fixtures Marketing Ltd and Oy Veikkaus Ab — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi and M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrators, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 November 2004, in which it has ruled:

The expression ‘investment in ... the obtaining ... of the contents’ of a database in Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be understood to refer to the resources used to seek out existing independent materials and collect them in the database. It does not cover the resources used for the creation of materials which make up the contents of a database. In the context of drawing up a fixture list for the purpose of organising football league fixtures, therefore, it does not cover the resources used to establish the dates, times and the team pairings for the various matches in the league.

---

(1)  OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

1

---
## SEP 222016 U.S.DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION 

# HEAF-liNG DOCKET OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF SKYWESTAIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNOS. 2012NM060025; 2011NM06005; 2011NM060073; 2011NM060072;

2011NM060047; 2011NM060063; 2011NM060038; 2011NM060081; 2011NM060095; 2012NM060014 FDMS NOS. FAA-2013-0292; FAA 2012-0777; FAA-2012-0868; FAA-2012-0869; FAA-2012-

0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-2012-0874; FAA-2012-0904; FAA-2013-0617; FAA-2013-0619

COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S FIFTHJOINT MOTION TO HOLD DECISIONS IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

Complainant and Respondent file this fifthjointmotion to hold the decisions in the abovereferenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome ofsettlement negotiations between the parties. I. On or about March 30, 2016, Representatives for Complainant and Respondent initiated global settlement discussions applicable to twenty-eight open SkyWest enforcement cases, inclusive ofthose currently pending on appeal before the Administrator. 2. Because these global settlement discussions have the potential to result in settlement ofthe above-referenced cases, on April 7, 2016, Complainant and Respondent filed ajoint motion to hold the decisions 

### in these cases in abeyance. 3. OnApril 8, 2016, AnthonyN. Palladino, Director and Administrative Judge, granted the parties' motion and held the decisions in abeyance for 30 calendardays. 4. On May 9, 2016, AnthonyN. Palladino, Director and Administrative Judge, granted the parties' secondjoint motion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additiona130 calendar days.5. On June 10, 2016, John A. Dietrich, Acting Director and Administrative Judge, granted the parties' thirdjointmotion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additional30 calendardays. 6. On July 26, 2016, John A. Dietrich, Director and Administrative Judge, granted the parties' fourthjointmotion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additional30 calendar days. 7. The parties are diligently pursuing settlement ofthese cases and the nature ofthese discussions is continuing and ongoing. WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent respectfully request the Administrator continue to hold any decisions in the above-referenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome of these settlement negotiations and a fULther motion by the parties.

Dated: September22, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

# ~~;,,**~m~** Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

### ~

Todd Emerson, Esq. General Counsel SkyWest Airlines 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE l hereby ce11ify that l served bypersonal delivery, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Request for an Extension ofTime in the matter ofSkyWest, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA2013-0292, et. a!., addressed to: Attn: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WI00 Washington, D.C., 20591