alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2248 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2248

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from revising the approved 
    oil and gas leasing program for fiscal years 2017 through 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2017

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from revising the approved 
    oil and gas leasing program for fiscal years 2017 through 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REVISING APPROVED 2017-2022 OIL AND GAS 
              LEASING PROGRAM.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall not revise the approved oil and 
gas leasing program for the period of fiscal years 2017 through 2022 
prepared under section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
U.S.C. 1344) and described in the document entitled ``2017-2022 Outer 
Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program'' and 
dated November 2016.
                                 <all>
```
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Dust Control from Animal Activity on Open Lot Surfaces, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Fence, Heavy Use Area Protection, Livestock Pipeline, Prescribed Grazing, Spring Development, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water Well.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Pa g e 1 of 5 - Print Pa g es 3/14/2008 http ://www. p owerma g -di g ital.com/ p owerma g/200803/temp lates/ p a g eviewer _p rint? pg =61...Pa g e 2 of 5 - Print Pa g es 3/14/2008 http ://www. p owerma g -di g ital.com/ p owerma g/200803/temp lates/ p a g eviewer _p rint? pg =61...Pa g e 3 of 5 - Print Pa g es 3/14/2008 http ://www. p owerma g -di g ital.com/ p owerma g/200803/temp lates/ p a g eviewer _p rint? pg =61...Pa g e 4 of 5 - Print Pa g es 3/14/2008 http ://www. p owerma g -di g ital.com/ p owerma g/200803/temp lates/ p a g eviewer _p rint? pg =61...Pa g e 5 of 5 - Print Pa g es 3/14/2008 http ://www. p owerma g -di g ital.com/ p owerma g/200803/temp lates/ p a g eviewer _p rint? pg =61...
1 Attachment 

Dear Mr. El-Zoobi:

The attached written responses to the questions you raised on the Fluorotelomers Incineration 

Testing ECA Final Study Report follow up on the responses we provided during the December 

3, 2010 conference call on this subject. I apologize for the delay in sending this additional 

information and appreciate your patience.

As the Final Study Report demonstrated, the testing program complied with the GLPs and met 

all the requirements of the EPA-approved Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for each 

phase of the study. The attached responses clarify and supplement information presented in 

the Final Study Report.

Based on the discussion during our conference call, I trust that these written responses will 

facilitate completion of your report review. 

We plan to provide EPA with a preprint of the journal article on this study once it is accepted 

RE: Questions on The Final Report on the Fluorotelomer Incineration ECA Testing

Taylor, Philip H 

to: 

Majd El-Zoobi 

12/01/2011 09:00 AM 

Hide Details 

From: "Taylor, Philip H" <Philip.Taylor@udri.udayton.edu> 

To: Majd El-Zoobi/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Incineration ECA Response to EPA Review of Fluorotelomers Amended Study Report.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\melzoobi\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web7151... 4/25/2013
for publication with reviewer comments having been addressed.

Please contact me if you have any further questions or require any additional information. 

Regards,

Phil Taylor, Ph.D.

Group Leader - Environmental Engineering Group

Distinguished Research Scientist

University of Dayton Research Institute

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\melzoobi\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web7151... 4/25/2013
### M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 229TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DUVAL COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 25, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Melissa Broquet and John Broquet, Appellant

V.

Walter Mortgage Company, Appellee

No. 04

- 14

- 00707

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. DC

- 12

- 60

- A

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of appeal are taxed

against appellant.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00707

- CV

Melissa Broquet and John Broquet

v.

Walter Mortgage Company

(NO. DC

- 12

- 60

- A IN 229TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DUVAL COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

FILING

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$224.00

$10.00

$25.00

$20.00

$50.00

$100.00

$10.00

$335.00 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

UNKNOWN HECTOR P. GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR P. GONZALEZ

PLAINTIFFS

HECTOR GONZALEZ

MELISSA BROQUET

MELISSA BROQUET

MELISSA BROQUET

MELISSA BROQUET

AUDREY VICKNAIR

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in**  **this cause shall**  **be paid as**  **per the**  **Judgment issued by**  **this Court.** 

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this June 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
# C_2005093EN.01001301.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/13

---

Action brought on 10 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-58/05)

(2005/C 93/23)

Language of the case: Swedish

An action against the Kingdom of Sweden was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 10 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by L. Ström van Lier and N. Yerrell, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and other provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA), or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those provisions, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that Directive, and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and other provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2000/79/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 concerning the European Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Mobile Workers in Civil Aviation concluded by the Association of European Airlines (AEA), the European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF), the European Cockpit Association (ECA), the European Regions Airline Association (ERA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA), or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those provisions, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of that Directive, and

1

| 2. | Order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementing the Directive expired on 1 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 302 of 1 December 2000, p. 57.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: March 17, 2009
    /s/ JOHN R. BEAVERJohn R. BeaverSenior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 1= 3W

Motion of

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203

for confidential treatment under Rule

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7)

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

FRANCIS C. HElL

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs

American Airlines, Inc.

1101 17th Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 496-5642

francis.heil@aa.com

April 4, 2014
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203

for confidential treatment under Rule

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7)

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 4Q2013 be accorded

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. The

information for which confidential treatment is requested

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements.

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580,

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report

electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the

current submission should also receive confidential treatment

for 10 years.
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be withheld

from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs

American Airlines, Inc.

April 4, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>                        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                                FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART
                                OF 360 COMMUNICATIONS' FIRST QUARTER 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0001003959
<NAME>                          360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        7,123 
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                99,223 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  6,187 
<INVENTORY>                                  26,590 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            214,451 
<PP&E>                                    1,782,963 
<DEPRECIATION>                              603,721 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,936,234 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       293,743 
<BONDS>                                   1,845,400 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      1,233 
<OTHER-SE>                                  554,173 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,936,234 
<SALES>                                      13,260 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            354,835 
<CGS>                                        28,434 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                40,792 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             67,706 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              9,050 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           33,259 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              79,648 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 35,528 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          44,120 
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 44,120 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.2

                             Employment Agreement
                                    Between
                           The Southern Bank Company
                                and Gates Little

                                 2000 Amendment
                                 --------------

     WHEREAS, The Southern Bank Company (the "Bank") has entered into an
Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") with Gates Little (the "Employee"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Bank (the "Board") and the Employee
have determined that it is appropriate to amend the Agreement to redefine the
Employee's position with the Bank.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement shall be amended as follows, effective
immediately.

     1.   The first sentence in Section 1 shall be amended by replacing "V ice
          President" with "President and Chief Operating Officer."

     2.   Nothing contained herein shall be held to alter, vary or otherwise
          affect any of the terms, provisions or conditions of the Agreement
          other than as stated above.

     WHEREFORE, on this 2lst day of September 2000, the undersigned hereby
approve this 2000 Amendment to the Agreement.


                                  THE SOUTHERN BANK COMPANY


                                  By_______________________________
                                     Its Secretary



                                     ______________________________
                                                     Gates Little
# C_2005106EN.01003801.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/38

---

Action brought on 18 February 2005 by the Italian Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-83/05)

(2005/C 106/76)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 February 2005 by the Italian Republic, represented by Antonio Cingolo, Avvocato dello Stato.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the Commission's decisions of: 16 December 2004 (P.E.P. Sicily 2000-2006), 13 January 2005 (P.E.P. Calabria Ob. 1 2000-2006), 13 January 2005 (P.E.P. Apulia Ob. 1 2000-2006), 17 January 2005 (Docup Lombardy Ob. 2 2000-2006), 17 January 2005 (P.E.P. Calabria Ob. 1 2000-2006) and 26 January 2005 (P.E.P. Sardinia Ob. 1 2000-2006), all intended to make implementation of the payment of certain advances in the sphere of aid schemes conditional upon fulfilment of obligations not required by the legislation in force, for the purpose of improperly limiting the expenditure which is eligible for the use of the Structural Funds concerned; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the Commission's decisions of: 16 December 2004 (P.E.P. Sicily 2000-2006), 13 January 2005 (P.E.P. Calabria Ob. 1 2000-2006), 13 January 2005 (P.E.P. Apulia Ob. 1 2000-2006), 17 January 2005 (Docup Lombardy Ob. 2 2000-2006), 17 January 2005 (P.E.P. Calabria Ob. 1 2000-2006) and 26 January 2005 (P.E.P. Sardinia Ob. 1 2000-2006), all intended to make implementation of the payment of certain advances in the sphere of aid schemes conditional upon fulfilment of obligations not required by the legislation in force, for the purpose of improperly limiting the expenditure which is eligible for the use of the Structural Funds concerned;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-345/04 Italian Republic v Commission
   (1).

Italian Republic

Commission

1

---

(1)  O.J.E.U. C 262 of 23 October 2004, p. 55.

1

---
# CA2004277EN.01000301.xml

| 12.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 277/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 277/3

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director-General (grade A*15) at the Joint Research Centre (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)COM/R/7022/04

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 234 A of 21 September 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 234 A of 21 September 2004

(2004/C 277 A/01)

On page 42, under the heading ‘Closing Date’:

for :

for :

‘The closing date for registration is 15 November 2004. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’,

15 November 2004

read :

read :

‘The closing date for registration is 30 November 2004. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.’

30 November 2004

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>          0001004539
<NAME>         AIRPLANES LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              187
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (14)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    203
<PP&E>                                            4,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               125
<BONDS>                                           3,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,626)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,875
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    107
<CGS>                                                (1)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       (61)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     (4)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (115)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (82)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (80)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (80)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>