alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004267EN.01000101.xml

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 October 2004

(2004/C 267/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2737 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69565 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,053 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5299 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,98 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5765 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,535 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,04 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6748 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4309 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3248 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 873 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,82 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,94 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 877 600 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9133 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8666 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1189 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 425,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8017 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2737

JPY

Japanese yen

135,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69565

SEK

Swedish krona

9,053

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5299

ISK

Iceland króna

87,98

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5765

CZK

Czech koruna

31,535

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,04

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6748

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4309

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3248

ROL

Romanian leu

40 873

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,82

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,94

TRL

Turkish lira

1 877 600

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9133

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8666

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1189

KRW

South Korean won

1 425,78

ZAR

South African rand

7,8017

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**PILOT LOGBOOK**

This is a copy of the Pilot Log Book that I created to document my UAS flights. It is very

similar to my Private Pilot Log Book and follows a similar format. Enclosed are the first

three pages of the Log Book to give an example of how I have documented my flights.

Page 1Page 2

Page 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 February 11, 2015; 10:00 a.m.

      ( print page 6713)    

# PLACE:

 800 N. Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Open Session

1. Briefing on FMC Continuity of Operations Plan

2. Briefing on FMC Information Technology Upgrade

## Closed Session

1. Briefing on Los Angeles and Long Beach Port Infrastructure and Environmental Programs Cooperative Working Agreement, FMC Agreement No. 201219

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02558 Filed 2-4-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                            REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into effective
as of March 1, 2001, by and between Vyyo Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), and John O'Connell ("O'Connell").

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto have entered into a Loan and Pledge Agreement
dated as of December 4, 2000, and amended as of March 1, 2001 (as so amended,
the "Loan Agreement"), and in connection therewith O'Connell has issued a
promissory note dated December 4, 2000 to the Corporation (the "Note"); and

     WHEREAS, in consideration of the Loan Agreement and the Note, the parties
desire to enter into this Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

     1.  The Corporation hereby agrees that it shall reimburse O'Connell up to
$500,000 for any net United States (federal) and California income tax liability
incurred by O'Connell as a direct result of either (i) the amendment of the Loan
Agreement or (ii) the final settlement of the loan extended to O'Connell by the
Corporation pursuant to the Loan Agreement and the Note, provided that at the
time of such final settlement (i) O'Connell delivers and assigns to the
Corporation all of the shares of the Corporation's common stock securing the
Note and (ii) the market value of the shares securing the Note is not greater
than the balance of the principal and interest then due under the Note.  Subject
to the above $500,000 limit, the Corporation shall also reimburse O'Connell for
any net United States (federal) and California tax liability directly resulting
from any of the above reimbursement payments to O'Connell pursuant to this
Agreement.

     2.  This Agreement, and all the terms hereof, shall inure to the benefit of
and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors,
executors, administrators or assigns.

     3.  This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the state of California, applicable to contracts between California
residents entered into and to be performed entirely within the state of
California.

     4.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which may be executed by less than all of the parties, each of which shall be
enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts, and all of
which together shall constitute one instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as
of the 1st day of March, 2001.


VYYO INC.                                    JOHN O'CONNELL



By:  /s/ Davidi Gilo                         /s/ John O'Connell
   -----------------------------             ---------------------
Name:   Davidi Gilo
      --------------------------
Title:  Chairman of the Board
      --------------------------
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JOSE LUIS C ORR

ALES-NAVAR

R O, Pe titione r,
v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-72507 Age n c y No. A020-451-318
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Argue d Nove m

b e r 21, 2014 Subm itte d De c e m

be r 30, 2014 Sa n Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge , C HR ISTEN, C i rc u it Judge , a nd SEAB R IGHT, ** Distric t Judge
. Jose Luis C o rra l e s-Nava

rro, a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, wa s c onvic te d of hinde ring prose c u t ion unde r Ariz o na R e vise d Statute § 13-2512. An 

# F IL ED
M AR 31 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble J. M ic ha e l Se a

bright, Distric t

Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha wa ii, sitting by de signa

tion.Im

m i gra tion Judgeorde re d him re m ove d to M e xic o, de te rm ining his c onvic tion to be an a ggrava te d fe lony be c a

use it is a n offe n se re l a ting to obstruc tion of justic e unde r 8 U.S.C
. § 1101(a )(43)(S). Apply ing the inte rpre tation of “ obstruc tion of justic e ” artic ulat e d in

In reVale nzue la Gallardo , 25 I. & N. De c . 838 (B IA 2012), the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls dismisse d C orra le s -Na va rro’ s a p p e a l. C orra le sNava rro now pe titions for re vie w. 1 W e have jurisdic tion pursua nt to 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(D). In light of our de c ision in Vale nzue l

a Gallardo v . Ly nc h , No. 12-72326, we re m an d to the B oa rd for e i the r a

pplic at ion of the a g e nc y

inte rpre tation a

nnounc e d in In reEspinoza Gonzale z , 22 I. & N. De c . 889 (B IA 1999), or c onside ra tion of a ne w c onstruc tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1101(a )(43)(S). B e c a use we do not re a c h

C orra le s-Nava

rro’ s va rious
argum e nts, we de ny

a s m oot the Gove rnm e nt’ s m otion to strike va rious portions of C orra l e s-Nava

rro’ s re ply

brie f. PE T IT IO N G RANT E D IN PART , AND RE M ANDE D.

1 The pa

rtie s a re fa m ilia r with the fa c t s, so we do not re c ount the m in de ta il.C

orrale s -N av arro v . Ly nc h , No. 12-72507
SEAB R IGHT, Distric t Judge , disse nting: I re spe c tfully

disse nt for the re a s ons sta te d in m y disse nt from

the m a jority Opinion in Vale nzue l

a Gallardo v . Ly nc h , No. 12-72326. 

# F IL ED
M AR 31 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
# C_2005108EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 May 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 May 2005

(2005/C 108/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2856 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67995 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2249 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5438 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,144 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5823 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,323 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2295 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 230 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,55 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,27 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7673 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6625 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6153 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0226 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7731 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1078 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8801 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6403 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,355 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 258,2 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8852 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,712 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,785 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,827 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2856

JPY

Japanese yen

135,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67995

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2249

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5438

ISK

Iceland króna

82,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,144

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5823

CZK

Czech koruna

30,323

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2295

ROL

Romanian leu

36 230

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,55

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,27

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7673

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6625

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6153

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0226

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7731

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1078

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,81

ZAR

South African rand

7,8801

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6403

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,355

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 258,2

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8852

PHP

Philippine peso

69,712

RUB

Russian rouble

35,785

THB

Thai baht

50,827

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
We have issued our report dated June 16,  2000,  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedule  included  in the  Annual  Report of Schick
Technologies,  Inc.  on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,  2000.  We hereby
consent to the  incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration
Statement  of  Schick  Technologies,  Inc.  on Form S-8  (File  No.  333-46825),
effective February 24, 1998.

GRANT THORNTON LLP (manually)

New York, New York
June 16, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  PRIDE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements for the three months ended February 28, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 dec-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   feb-28-1998
<CASH>                                         13,689
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,243,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    179,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         30,879,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,308,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,724,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,912,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,724,367
<SALES>                                        3,580,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,580,971
<CGS>                                          2,552,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,552,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             575,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (194,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (194,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (194,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)

        

</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9 , 202 4

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 4

- 00 110

- CV

JOSHUA DEROCHE AND TEXAS POOL

- AID, LLC , Appellant s
V. CMI ENTERPRISES, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 2

- CV

- 2292

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed October 31 , 2023 . The notice of appeal
was filed February 12, 2024

. To date, our records show that appellant s ha ve not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil
cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs) ; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs). Moreover, n o clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant s had not paid for the record, and there is otherwise no indication2

appellant s ha ve made arrangements to pay for the record.

O n February 23 , 202 4
, appellant s w ere instructed to pay the appellate filing
fee on or before March 4 , 20 2 4 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without
further notice

. In addition, on February 28 , 202 4
, notification was transmitted to appellant s that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant s made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant s did not provide any response to any of those notices.

On March 19 , 202 4 , appellant s w as ordered to pay the filing fee and
demonstrate they had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before
March 29 , 202 4

. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). In the order, the court notified appellant s that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution

. Appellant s ha ve not paid the appellate filing fee, they have not provided this court with proof of payment for the record, nor have they otherwise responded to the
court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9821-105]


Trafalgar Power, Inc., Ampersand Ogdensburg Hydro, LLC; Notice of 
Application for Transfer of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To 
Intervene, and Protests

    On January 27, 2015, Trafalgar Power, Inc. (transferor) and 
Ampersand Ogdensburg Hydro, LLC (transferee) filed an application for 
transfer of license of the Ogdensburg Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 
9821. The project is located on the Oswegatchie River in St. Lawrence 
County, New York.
    The applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for 
the Ogdensburg Project from the transferor to the transferee.
    Applicant Contact: For Transferor: Mr. Arthur Steckler, President, 
Trafalgar Power, Inc., 11010 Lake Grove Blvd., Suite 100, Box 353, 
Morrisville, NC 27560-7392. For Transferee: Mr. Lutz Loegters, 
Ampersand Ogdensburg Hydro, LLC, c/o Ampersand Hydro, LLC, 717 Atlantic 
Avenue, Suite 1A, Boston, MA 02111.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, (202) 502-8735.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests: 
30 days from the date that the Commission issues this notice. The 
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file motions 
to intervene, comments, and protests using the Commission's eFiling 
system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can 
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior 
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information 
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2b4b7a0b1bd9c9e9b9c97a18782829d8086b294978091dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b6b5a2b3bf9e9c999e95a38580809f8284b096958293de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>, (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or 
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper 
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should 
include docket number P-9821-105.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02930 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2005082EN.01001301.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/13

---

Action brought on 31 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-33/05)

(2005/C 82/27)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 31 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Sara Pardo Quintillán and Joanna Hottiaux, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the Directive into national law expired on 22 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1

1

---