alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DEN ON DEM. of CASWELL HARBIN et. al. *vs.*JOHN S. CARSON.

Dec. 1839

The levy of an attachment upon land creates such a lien upon it, that if there be a subsequent judgment of condemnation and a sale of the land under a writ of *venditioni exponas,*the title of the purchaser will supersede that of one claiming under a judgment and *jfieri facias*posterior to the date of the levy of the attachment, but prior to the judgment of condemnation and *venditioni exponas.*

This was an action of Ejectment, tried at Davie, on the last circuit, before his honor Judge Dick. Both parties claimed title under one Bennet Austin. The lessors of the plaintiff produced a judgment against the said Austin, entered up at August Term, 1836, of Rowan County Court, an execution thereon returnable to the ensuing term in November, and a deed from the coroner to themselves for the lands in controversy, which were sold under the said execution. The defendant shewed in evidence the proceedings in an original attachment issued by himself against the said Austin, on the 27th of April, 1836, levied on the lands in controversy the same day, and returned t6 May term, 1836, of Rowan County Court. He then shewed a regular final judgment entered up on said attachment at the ensuing November term of the said Court, a writ of *venditioni exponas*thereon, returnable to the ensuing term in February, under which the said lands were sold; and a deed to himself therefor from the sheriff.

The only question presented to the Court was, whether the title passed to the lessors, of the plaintiff, by virtue of then-purchase, under the execution issuing upon the judgment at August term, 1836; or whether the levy of the attachment upon the lands in April, 1836, created such a lien as, when consummated by a judgment of condemnation and a sale under a *venditioni exponas*issuing thereon, gave the defendant the better title. His Honor being of opinion in favour of the lessors of the plaintiff, the jury found a verdict for *them,*upon which they had judgment, and the defendant appealed.

No counsel appeared for either party in this Court.

Daniel, Judge.

The only question in the case submitted' *389for the decision of this Court is, whether the levy under the defendant’s attachment, in April, 1836, which was prior the date of the plaintiff’s execution, created such a lien on the land, as when condemned and sold under the writ of *venditioni*exponas, gave to the defendant the better title. We are of the opinion that it did. The case of *Den on dem. of Amyett*vs. Backhouse, 3 Murph. 63, establishes the proposition contended for on behalf of the defendant. We think that there must be a new trial.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1019-1020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

30 CFR Part 585

[Docket ID: BOEM-2010-0045]
RIN 1010-AD79

Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on the 
Outer Continental Shelf--Acquire a Lease Non-competitively; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects amendments contained in a direct final 
rule published in the Federal Register on October 18, 2011, and 
involves only that portion of the rule related to acquiring a lease 
non-competitively for offshore renewable energy projects.

DATES: Effective Date: This correction is effective on January 9, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Meffert, Regulatory Affairs, 
BOEM, at (703) 787-1610, fax (703) 787-1555, or email 
peter.meffert@boem.gov or Timothy Redding, Renewable Energy, BOEM, at 
(703) 787-1219 or email Timothy.Redding@boem.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BOEM is correcting portions of its 
previously published direct final rule that misstated existing 
regulatory text having to do with acquiring a lease non-competitively 
for offshore renewable energy projects. The corrections involve 
Sec. Sec.  585.231 and 585.232.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 585

    Continental shelf, Environmental protection, Incorporation by 
reference, Public lands.

    Dated: December 21, 2011.
Marcilynn A. Burke,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
    Accordingly, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is making the 
correcting amendments to 30 CFR part 585 as follows:

PART 585--RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING 
FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF

0
1. The authority citation for part 585 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1337.

0
2. Amend Sec.  585.231 by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  585.231  How will BOEM process my unsolicited request to acquire 
a lease non-competitively?

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) A notice that BOEM has made a determination that there is no 
competitive interest will be published in the Federal Register; and
* * * * *

0
3. Amend Sec.  585.232 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  585.232  May I acquire a lease noncompetitively after responding 
to a Request for Interest or Call for Information and Nominations?

* * * * *

[[Page 1020]]

    (c) After receiving the acquisition fee, BOEM will follow the 
process outlined in Sec.  585.231(d) through (i).

[FR Doc. 2012-50 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                            Exhibit 11
                         RISCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Statement Re. Computation of Per Share Earnings
               For the three months ended March 31, 1998 and 1997
               (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


                                                                                            1998                   1997
                                                                                       ---------------        ----------------
                                                                                         (Unaudited)            (Unaudited)

<S>                                                                                   <C>                    <C>
Net (loss) income                                                                     $      (4,135)         $        1,479
                                                                                      =============          ==============

Weighted average common and common share equivalents outstanding:

     Average number of common shares outstanding                                         36,818,414              36,174,098
     Redemption contingency for CompSource acquisition                                           --                 502,566
     Redemption contingency for IAA acquisition                                                  --                 790,336
                                                                                         ----------            ------------
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                                          36,818,414              37,467,000


     Common stock equivalents--assumed exercise of stock options                                 --                 308,562
  
        Weighted average common and                                                     -----------             -----------
             common share equivalents outstanding                                        36,818,414              37,775,562
                                                                                        ===========             ===========


Net (loss) earnings per share - basic                                                 $       (0.11)          $        0.04
                                                                                       ============            ============

Net (loss) earnings per share - diluted                                               $       (0.11)          $        0.04
                                                                                       ============            ============

</TABLE>

                                       28
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an
officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI.



|                      |  |     |  |                                         
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date:  March 26, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOSEPH A.
LARGEY                 
|                      |  |     |  | Joseph A. Largey Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|                      |  |    
|Date:  March 26, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    CHARLES L.
POPE                  
|                      |  |     |  | Charles L. Pope Chief Financial Officer 
|                      |
# C_2004246EN.01000101.xml

| 5.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 October 2004

(2004/C 246/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2305 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68855 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0448 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,552 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,64 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5757 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,528 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6648 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4288 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3242 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 165 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,96 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,035 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 859 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7064 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5608 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5961 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8402 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0738 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 414,71 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9835 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2305

JPY

Japanese yen

136,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68855

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0448

CHF

Swiss franc

1,552

ISK

Iceland króna

87,64

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5757

CZK

Czech koruna

31,528

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6648

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4288

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3242

ROL

Romanian leu

41 165

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,96

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,035

TRL

Turkish lira

1 859 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7064

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5608

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5961

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8402

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0738

KRW

South Korean won

1 414,71

ZAR

South African rand

7,9835

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OR
                    RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 11, 2004

                                          /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Richard W. Lucas
                                          Chief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-14-00460-CR

RUSSELL LAMAR ESTES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1388628R)

December 13, 2018

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(p)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

On remand from the court of criminal appeals, this court has again considered 

the record on appeal and holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s 

judgments. It is ordered that the judgments of the trial court are affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Technical Basis for Revision of the Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Screening Limit in the PTS Rule (10 CFR 50.61) (NUREG-1806)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-986-987 (Second Review)]


Ferrovanadium From China and South Africa; Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping 
duty orders on ferrovanadium from China and South Africa would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2013 (78 FR 
65706) and determined on February 4, 2014 that it would conduct full 
reviews (79 FR 9000, February 14, 2014). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
July 10, 2014 (79 FR 39411). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on 
November 20, 2014, and all persons who requested the opportunity were 
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these 
reviews on January 28, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained 
in USITC Publication 4517 (January 2015), entitled Ferrovanadium from 
China and South Africa: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-986-987 (Second 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: January 28, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-02004 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) (7/2022) Standard Document(106.07 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) Overview(130.29 KB)

Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) CPPE(25.62 KB)

Vegetated Treatment Area (Ac.) (635) Network Effects Diagram(78.39 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2005092EN.01003302.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/33

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3511 — Wiener Börse et al./Budapest Stock Exchange/Budapest Commodity Exchange/KELER/JV)

(2005/C 92/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3511. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3511. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Leadership 1961- Present

Name
   TermHonorable Dr. Christopher Scolese
   August 2019 - PresentBetty J. Sapp
   Betty J. Sapp
   July 2012 - April 2019General Bruce Carlson, USAF (Ret)
   General Bruce Carlson, USAF (Ret)
   July 2009 - July 2012Mr. Scott F. Large
   Mr. Scott F. Large
   October 2007 - April 2009Dr. Donald M. Kerr
   Dr. Donald M. Kerr
   July 2005 - October 2007Mr. Peter B. Teets
   Mr. Peter B. Teets
   December 2001 - March 2005Mr. Keith R. Hall
   Mr. Keith R. Hall
   March 1997 - December 2001Mr. Jeffrey K. Harris
   Mr. Jeffrey K. Harris
   May 1994 - February 1996Mr. Martin C. Faga
   Mr. Martin C. Faga
   September 1989 - March 1993Mr. Edward C. Aldridge, Jr.
   Mr. Edward (Pete) C. Aldridge, Jr.
   August 1981 - December 1988Dr. Robert J. Hermann
   Dr. Robert J. Hermann
   October 1979 - August 1981Dr. Hans Mark
   Dr. Hans Mark
   August 1977 - October 1979Mr. Thomas C. Reed
   Mr. Thomas C. Reed
   August 1976 - April 1977Mr. James W. Plummer
   Mr. James W. Plummer
   December 1973 - June 1976Dr. John L. McLucas
   Dr. John L. McLucas
   March 1969 - December 1973Dr. Alexander H. Flax
   Dr. Alexander H. Flax
   October 1965 - March 1969Dr. Brockway McMillan
   Dr. Brockway McMillan
   March 1963 - October 1965Dr. Joseph V. Charyk
   Dr. Joseph V. Charyk
   September 1961 - March 1963Dr. Richard M. Bissell, Jr.
   Dr. Richard M. Bissell, Jr.
   (Co-Director with Dr. Charyk)
   September 1961 - February 1962
 National Reconnaissance Office

Launch your Career Do Business With Us search Menu

Home
 About
 Careers
 Launches
 Work With Us
 News & Media
 Resourcesfacebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us NRO SealNational Reconnaissance Office

facebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us

Who We Are

Mission Partners & Customers
 Our Leadership
 A Declassified History

Careers

Working at the NRO
 Career Fields
 Job Listings
 Student Opportunities

Launches

Missions
 Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us

How To Do Business With Us
 Director's Innovation Initiative
 Acquisition Research Center

News & Media

Featured Stories
 Press Releases
 Podcasts
 Speeches and Testimony

Resources

NRO Multimedia
 Request a Speaker



USA FlagAn official website of the United States government. Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil

Policy

Site Policies
 Privacy
 No FEAR Act
 Inspector General
 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
 Accessibility
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No 

PMN: 05-0186 

Focus Ready Draft 2/14/05 

ENGINEER: Jon \ AMO 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: No 

Gen Eqpt: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL: 

CRSS (02/03/2005): 

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (02/04/2005): 

Migration to groundwater: negligible to rapid 

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 10 ppb) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 05/27/2004 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

P2 Claim: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
EPA SANITIZED 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No 

PMN: 05-0186 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. 

RELEASE TOTAL 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers: 

Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Dermal: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3