alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004239EN.01001201.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 July 2004

in Case T-44/00: Mannesmannröhren-Werke v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Competition - Cartels - Markets in seamless steel tubes - Duration of the infringement - Fines)

(2004/C 239/24)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-44/00: Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG, established in Mülheim an der Ruhr (Germany), represented by M. Klusmann, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Erhart and A. Whelan, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2003/382/EC of 8 December 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case IV/E-1/35.860-B seamless steel tubes) (OJ 2003, L 140, p. 1), or, alternatively, a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2003/382/EC of 8 December 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case IV/E-1/35.860-B seamless steel tubes) in so far as it finds that the infringement imputed to the applicant by that provision existed before 1 January 1991; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2003/382/EC of 8 December 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case IV/E-1/35.860-B seamless steel tubes) in so far as it finds that the infringement imputed to the applicant by that provision existed before 1 January 1991;

| 2. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 4 of Decision 2003/382 at EUR 12,600,000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 4 of Decision 2003/382 at EUR 12,600,000;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 4. | Orders the applicant and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the applicant and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 13.5.2000.

1

---
#### State *v.*Dalton.

From Rutherford.

An indictment charging ihe Defendant with forging a receipt against a *“*book account,” is too indefinite : the term is not known to the law, and in common parlance may mean money, goods, labour and whatever may be brought into account : had the charge been forging an acquittance for goods, the evidence of forging the pa. per described in the indictment, would have been proper for the jury.

Indictment in the following words, viz;

The Jurors for the State, upon their oath present, that James Dalton of the County of Rutherford, on the first day of October, one thousand eight hundred and seventeen, with force and arms in the County of Rutherford* by his own head and imagination, feloniously and wittingly, did falsely forge and make, and cause to be falsely forged and made, and did feloniously, willingly and wittingly assent in falsely making, forging and counterfeiting a certain acquittance and receipt against a book account, in the words, letters and figures following, that is to say: September 3d, 1816, IIeceived of Janies Dalton, his book accomptiu full, *John Logan,*with intent to defraud one John Logan, of the county of Rutherford, aforesaid, against the form of the statute in that case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of tiie state.

And the. jurors aforesaid, upon their oath aforesaid, do further present, that the said James Dalton, afterwards* to wit, on the said first day of October, one thousand, eight hundred and seventeen, aforesaid, with force and arms in the county aforesaid, a certain false, forged and counterfeited acquittance and receipt, against a book account, feloniously, wittingly, knowingly and corruptly, did, show forth in evidence as true, which said last men. tioned acqu itlance and receipt is in the words, letters and figures following, that is to say; September 3d, 1816, Received of James Dalton his book accompt in full: *John Logan;*with an intent to defraud the said John Logan, of the County of Rutherford, aforesaid, he the said. *380James Dalton at the time when he so shewed forth in-evidence the said last mentioned, false, forced and coun- . terfeiteu acquittance and receipt, well knowing the same acquittance and receipt, so by him shewed forth in evidence as aforesaid, to be false, forged and counterfeited, against the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State.

The prisoner was found guilty, and the only question here was, as to the sufficiency of the indictment.

Sjsawjeii, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The term, book account, is unknown in the law, and in common parlance, it may mean money, goods, labour and whatever may be brought into account. The charge is therefore, too indefinite, cither to support the indictment upon the act of Assembly or at common law. Had the indictment charged the forging of an acquittance for goods, this would certainly have been proper evidence to be left to a jury. But as the indictment is substantially defective, there can be no judgment for the State, and it must therefore, stand arrested.
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                          NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Nine Months    Nine Months    Three Months    Three Months
                                            Ended 9/30/00  Ended 9/30/99  Ended 9/30/00   Ended 9/30/99
                                            -------------  -------------  -------------   -------------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
NET EARNINGS/(LOSS)                          $   384,000    $   667,000    $  (315,000)    $   574,000
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========


EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - PRIMARY
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                          5,468,644      5,468,644      5,468,644       5,468,644
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========


Earnings/(Loss) per common share
Primary                                      $       .07    $       .12    $      (.06)    $        .0
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========


EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED
----------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                          5,468,644      5,468,644      5,468,644       5,468,644


Common and Common Stock equivalent shares
using the treasury stock method                  188,332              0        186,190               0
                                             -----------    -----------    -----------     -----------


Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings                   5,656,976      5,468,644      5,654,834       5,468,644
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========


Earnings per common and common Equivalent
share - Diluted                              $       .07    $       .12    $      (.06)    $       .10
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========     ===========

</TABLE>
*EXHIBIT 10.24*

* *

*SUMMARY OF ZONES, INC MERCHANDISING EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM*

* *

*The merchandising incentive program of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) rewards the Senior Vice President of Merchandising for achievement of financial and individual performance within the merchandising department.*

* *

*Under the merchandising incentive program, an executive officer is eligible to receive an incentive expressed as a percent of certain financial results if the financial targets are exceeded.  During 2004, the Senior Vice President of Merchandising received $49,354 under this incentive program.  Management believes this incentive should range from $40,000 to $60,000 in future years.*

* *

*The Board retained the right to change its incentive programs at any time.  The Board’s approval of the terms of the incentive program is not deemed to create an enforceable agreement between the Company and the executive officer.  No rights to any awards exist unless and until the Board authorizes payment of such award under the incentive program.*

* *
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF ELIMINATION

                                       OF

                    SERIES B $20 CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                        INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.

                       (Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the
                        Delaware General Corporation Law)

                  Integrated Security Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation") does hereby certify that the following resolutions respecting
Series B $20 Convertible Preferred Stock were duly adopted by the Corporation's
Board of Directors:

                           RESOLVED, that no shares of the Corporation's Series
                  B $20 Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding and that no
                  shares of the Series B $20 Convertible Preferred Stock will be
                  issued subject to the certificate of designation previously
                  filed with respect to the Series B $20 Convertible Preferred
                  Stock; and

                           FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the
                  Corporation are directed to file with the Secretary of State
                  of the State of Delaware a certificate pursuant to Section
                  151(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
                  setting forth these resolutions in order to eliminate from the
                  Corporation's certificate of incorporation all matters set
                  forth in the certificate of designation with respect to the
                  Series B $20 Convertible Preferred Stock.

                  In witness whereof, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 14th day of March,
2001.
                             INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


                             By:  /s/ C.A. RUNDELL, JR.
                                --------------------------------------------
                                  C.A. Rundell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GROUP LONG
DISTANCE, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0001004570
<NAME>                    GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 APR-30-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                      JUL-31-1997 
<CASH>                                751,829 
<SECURITIES>                                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                       8,014,947 
<ALLOWANCES>                        (634,000) 
<INVENTORY>                                 0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   15,702,632 
<PP&E>                                467,729 
<DEPRECIATION>                      (145,609) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     23,352,614 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              22,083,163 
<BONDS>                                     0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0 
<PREFERRED>                                 0 
<COMMON>                                    0 
<OTHER-SE>                            195,121 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       23,352,614 
<SALES>                                     0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    9,064,998 
<CGS>                               6,961,188 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,961,188 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    3,077,402 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      434,449 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     32,496 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,440,537) 
<INCOME-TAX>                         (96,784) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,343,753) 
<DISCONTINUED>                              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0 
<CHANGES>                                   0 
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,343,753) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.39) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.39) 
        



</TABLE>
# C_2004183EN.01000302.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3332 — GESO/ZWECKVERBAND/GASO)

(2004/C 183/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3332. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3332. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Rocky Mountain Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 24 WY 0.0351958 1.67E-05 0.0020958 0.0010125 0.0046958 0.0430167 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Rocky Mountain = 0.04 divided by 0.8, or 5% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 23 WY 0.0423348 3.91E-05 0.002313 0.0001174 0.0058957 0.0507 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Rocky Mountain = 0.05 divided by 0.5, or 10%
# C_2004313EN.01000101.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 December 2004

(2004/C 313/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3264 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4318 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68585 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9980 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5367 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,09 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2170 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5788 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,445 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6849 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4311 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1465 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 736 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,631 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 864 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7479 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6351 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3193 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8583 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1843 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 406,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6747 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3264

JPY

Japanese yen

138,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4318

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68585

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9980

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5367

ISK

Iceland króna

84,09

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2170

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5788

CZK

Czech koruna

30,445

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6849

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4311

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1465

ROL

Romanian leu

38 736

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,631

TRL

Turkish lira

1 864 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7479

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6351

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3193

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8583

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1843

KRW

South Korean won

1 406,12

ZAR

South African rand

7,6747

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005093EN.01002602.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/26

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 February 2005

in Case T-57/03 Société provençale d'achat et de gestion (SPAG) SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark HOOLIGAN - Earlier word marks OLLY GAN - Matters of fact or of law outside OHIM's jurisdiction - Admissibility - Likelihood of confusion)

(2005/C 93/52)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-57/03: Société provençale d'achat et de gestion (SPAG) SA, established in Marseille (France), represented by K. Manhaeve, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: U. Pfleghar and G. Schneider), the other parties to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Frank Dann and Andreas Backer, residing in Frankfurt-am-Main (Germany), represented by P. Baronikians, lawyer — action brought against the decision of 5 December 2002 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1072/2000-2), relating to opposition proceedings concerning the marks HOOLIGAN and OLLY GAN — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

1

---
# C_2004255EN.01001001.xml

| 15.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/10

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/B/9/03

OPEN COMPETITION

(Latvian language)

(2004/C 255/06)

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS (B5/B4) IN THE FIELDS OF PRODUCTION COORDINATION AND PROOFREADING

| Chairman: | Jean-Pascal RIHOUX |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate Chairman: | Eleonora SHILLING |
| Full Members: | Anja DAMEROW
  Maija BREDE |

Chairman:

Jean-Pascal RIHOUX

Alternate Chairman:

Eleonora SHILLING

Full Members:

Anja DAMEROW

Maija BREDE

---
# C_2005057EN.01004201.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/42

---

(2005/C 57/72)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 45, 19.2.2005

OJ C 45, 19.2.2005

Past publications

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
# C_2005138EN.01001302.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3793 — Barclays/Iveco/JV)

(2005/C 138/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 May 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3793. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3793. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

9 November 2015 • • 111 • 

UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN 

HANDLE VIA IrIEMANT CONTROL SYSTY44 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, National Reconnaissance Office 

SUBJECT: Relationship between the NRO and the USIB 

1. In regard to your memorandum of 5 June 1962, subject as above, 

the United States Intelligence Board'is undertaking as a matter of 

priority to prepare for transmission to you an updated statement of 

current collection requirements and priorities for overhead reconnaissance activities. This and future statements as necessary will 

be developed for the Board by its Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance. 

2. The USIB statement of collection requirements and priorities' 

will be fbrwarded to you as soon as it is completed and approved. 

3. In regard to your memorandum of 27 July 1962, same subject, 

the Board agrees with your proposal and the Chairman of the COMDR 

will hereafter include your designee; the Deputy fbr Operations, on 

notice for appropriate meetings and as a recipient of appropriate 

documentation. It is understood that he will serve in the capacitY 

of consultant and observer. The Board agrees that such participation 

should assist in achieving close working relationships between USIB 

.and the NRO. 

' "s*ozhati 

MARSHALL S. CARTER 

Lieutenant General, USA 

Acting Chairman 

HANDLE VIA HYMN CONTROL SYSTEM 

BYE-3770-62 

Copy / of 7 copies 

GROUP 1 

Excluded tarn Minmatic T danga(ilr: .