alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS

OF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) eachof the undersigned officers of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”)does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(a)           The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)          Information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Dated:  August 12, 2005

 

 
| /S/: Jacob Inbar        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| By: Jacob Inbar,        |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2005138EN.01001502.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3766 — Nordic Capital/Leaf INT)

(2005/C 138/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3766. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3766. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Axtive Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Graham C. Beachum II,
Chief Executive Officer of Axtive Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Graham C. Beachum II

---

Graham C. Beachum II

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer



July 18, 2003



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §
1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Axtive Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, David N. Pilotte, Chief Financial Officer of
Axtive Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David N. Pilotte

---

David N. Pilotte

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



July 18, 2003



A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906 has been provided to Axtive Corporation and will be retained by Axtive Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



These Certifications shall not be deemed to be filed or part of the referenced Annual Report on Form 10-KSB or incorporated by reference into any of the registrants filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filing to such report.
To:        Chris Winters
           Chugach Electric Association, Inc
           5601 Minnesota Drive
           Anchorage AK 995196300
           Telephone: (310) 312-9507
           Telecopier: (310) 312-9508

From:      Lehman Brothers Financial Products Inc.
           1 World Financial Center
           New York, NY 10285

           Chris Fonte (Documentation Contact)
           Telephone: (646) 836-2016
           Telecopier: (201) 524-2080

SUBJECT: Transaction Reference No: 168532 (22799/166793P)

This is to confirm the termination of the Swap transaction between Lehman
Brothers Financial Products Inc. ("Party A") and Chugach Electric Association,
Inc ("Party B") entered into on March 17, 1999 with a Notional Amount of USD
18,700,000 and a Termination Date of February 13, 2002 (the "Swap Transaction").

1.   Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the communication dated March
     17, 1999 this will confirm our agreement on May 11, 2001 to terminate the
     Swap Transaction upon payment on May 15, 2001, (the "Effective Termination
     Date") by Party A to Party B in the amount of USD 10,000 (the "Termination
     Amount").

2.   Upon receipt of the Termination Amount by Party B the rights and
     obligations of Party A and Party B under the Swap Transaction shall be
     terminated, except in respect of any amounts which have become due and
     remain unpaid on the Effective Termination Date.

3.   This Termination Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and
     understanding of the parties with respect to the termination of the Swap
     Transaction.

4.   This Termination Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
     with the laws of The State of New York, without reference to choice of law
     doctrine.


<PAGE>







Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms of our
agreement with respect to this Transaction by signing in the space provided
below and sending a copy of the executed Confirmation by fax (201-524-2080) to
the Confirmation Group at Lehman Brothers Financial Products Inc.


Yours faithfully

Lehman Brothers Financial Products Inc.

/s/ Diana Nottingham

Diana Nottingham
Authorized Signatory

Agreed and accepted by:
Chugach Electric Association, Inc




By:      /s/ Evan J. Griffith

         Name: Evan J. Griffith
         Title: Executive Manager, Finance & Energy Supply
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
# We seefrom the perspective of stars

NRO systems address the nation's toughest intelligence challenges, providing information and perspectives unavailable from other sources. Millions of people depend on vital intelligence that NRO capabilities deliver every day.
NRO OverviewClick to see full video 

PlayPause

## NRO's most important asset is our people

Dr. Chris Scolese**NRO Director**

## ABOVE AND BEYOND

NRO's motto "Supra et Ultra," meaning Above and Beyond, reflects our mission to use our exquisite capabilities to secure and expand U.S. intelligence; to see, hear, and sense all around us; all in alignment with our values of operating with personal integrity and accountability, mission excellence, and teamwork.

## Our Leadership

Meet our Director, Deputy Director, Principal Deputy Director, and Senior Enlisted Leader, collectively referred to as our "Top Four."
Meet our Leadership

        -   Dr. Chris ScoleseDirectorRead Bio east 
        -   Dr. Troy MeinkPrincipal Deputy DirectorRead Bio east 
        -   Maj. Gen. Chris PovakDeputy DirectorRead Bio east 
        -   Chief MSgt. Kevin Ryan Jr.Senior Enlisted LeaderRead Bio east 

## We make intelligence possible

NRO succeeds because of the skills and dedication of our talented workforce. Here's where we come from.

## Mission Partners

NRO works across intelligence organizations, the Department of Defense, and with foreign partners to keep America and our allies aware, informed, and safe.
more on our partners

## Our locations

## A Declassified History

The history of NRO is a story of how opportunity, necessity, and determination converged to produce an intelligence organization unlike any that had come before.
Learn our History
# C_2005069EN.01000601.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Corte d'Appello di Cagliari by order of that court of 12 November 2004 in the case of Gaetano Verdoliva against J.M. Van Der Hoeven B.N.

(Case C-3/05)

(2005/C 69/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Corte d'Appello di Cagliari (Italy) of 12 November 2004, received at the Court Registry on 6 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Gaetano Verdoliva and J.M. Van Der Hoeven B.N. on the following questions:

| — | ‘Does the Brussels Convention provide its own definition of notice of procedural documents or is that concept left to be defined by national rules? |
| --- | --- |

—

‘Does the Brussels Convention provide its own definition of notice of procedural documents or is that concept left to be defined by national rules?

| — | Can it be inferred from the rules of the Brussels Convention, and in particular from Article 36 thereof, that the decision authorising enforcement referred to in Article 36 of the Convention may be the subject of acts equivalent to service? |
| --- | --- |

—

Can it be inferred from the rules of the Brussels Convention, and in particular from Article 36 thereof, that the decision authorising enforcement referred to in Article 36 of the Convention may be the subject of acts equivalent to service?

| — | Does notice of the decision authorising enforcement, in cases of failure of, or defective, service, none the less cause time to run for the purposes of the time-limit referred to in that article? If not, is the Brussels Convention to be interpreted as limiting the ways in which there may be found to be notice of the decision authorising enforcement?’ |
| --- | --- |

—

Does notice of the decision authorising enforcement, in cases of failure of, or defective, service, none the less cause time to run for the purposes of the time-limit referred to in that article? If not, is the Brussels Convention to be interpreted as limiting the ways in which there may be found to be notice of the decision authorising enforcement?’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations on
pages F-3 and F-4 of the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year
ending December 31, 1996, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1000

<S>                                   <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<CASH>                                      7,103
<SECURITIES>                               10,465
<RECEIVABLES>                                 254
<ALLOWANCES>                                   25
<INVENTORY>                                   153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             26,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      10,175
<BONDS>                                     8,338
<COMMON>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     1
<OTHER-SE>                                 12,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               26,277
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           14,004
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               7,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             5,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         3,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (100)
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                3,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.62





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,789,274
<SECURITIES>                                 8,779,773
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,382,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,482,091
<PP&E>                                       8,260,264
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,427,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,028,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,514,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,768,753
<COMMON>                                    81,740,931
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,995,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,028,327
<SALES>                                      1,514,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,514,243
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,479,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,559,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,559,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,559,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Irrigation Field Ditch, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation System-Microirrigation, Irrigation System-Sprinkler, Irrigation System-Surface & Subsurface, Irrigation Water Management, Pond, Pond Sealing or Lining-Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining-Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining-Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining-Soil Dispersant, Pumping Plant, Structure for Water Control, Water and Sediment Control Basin.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,814
<PP&E>                                             750
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,074
<SALES>                                          4,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            2,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (68)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    201
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       196
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129493 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129493 COA: 262507 St Joseph CC: 02-011272-FH NATHAN ALLAN BOES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1208 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2005

Clerk
# C_2005093EN.01002303.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/23

---

Removal from the register of Case C-501/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 93/45)

(Language of the case: Swedish)

(Language of the case: Swedish)

By order of 10 January 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-501/03 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.01.2004.

1

---
Interim Decision #1452

• Marna or Ciux In Section 206 Proceedings A-13744336 Decided by District' Director August 81, 1964 It having been established petitioner is not a United States citizen, approval of the visa petition to 'accord his wife nonguota status is revoked since petitioner, following notification by the Service of intent to revoke the approval, pursuant to 8 CPR 206.3, failed to avail himself of the oppor; tunity Milled him to offer evidence in Opposition thereto. Discussion: The petitioner under the name of Chin Tun Joe filed a visa petition on October 29, 1963 to accord Yee Mon Yue nonquota immigrant status as the wife. of a United States citizen. The petition. was approved by the District Director • of Immigration andNaturalization, Boston, Maisachusetts on December 18, 1963 and forwarded to the Secretary of State for transmittal to tife American Consul in Hong Kong. • On july 1, 1961 the petitioner appeared before an officer of this Service at Boston, Massachusetts and I draitted that.his true name
was Chin Bak goon and that he was a citizen of China and not of the United. States; that his original entry into the United States at Boston, Massachusetts on August 22, 1961 as a Unittd States citizen was fraudulent. It has been established that-the petitioner is not a United States citizen and, therefore, not entitled to accord. his Spouse the nonquota immigrant status given by this Service on December 13,-1963.

. In accordatice with the provisions of 8 CFR 2064 a notice of intent to revoke 'the approval of this visa phtition was forwarded to the petitioner ''on July 29, 1961 and the was permitted fifteen den from the date of

-

mailing within which to submit written objection to the proposed revocation of the approval of the visa petition. The petitioner failed to avail himself of this opportunity to submit any ,objections. ORDER: On the basis of the foregoing it is ordered that the approval of the visa petition be revoked. 131
#### Hoeppner, Administratrix, Appellant, vs. E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Company, Inc., Respondent.

For the appellant: *Seher & Seher*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Lines, Spooner & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Chas. B. Quarles*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.