alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2128 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2128

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit private persons 
   to compel the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek legal or 
  equitable remedies in a civil action, instead of an administrative 
                  proceeding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2017

 Mr. Davidson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit private persons 
   to compel the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek legal or 
  equitable remedies in a civil action, instead of an administrative 
                  proceeding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process Restoration Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE PARTIES AUTHORIZED TO COMPEL THE SECURITIES AND 
              EXCHANGE COMMISSION TO SEEK SANCTIONS BY FILING CIVIL 
              ACTIONS.

    The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end of title I the following:

``SEC. 40. PRIVATE PARTIES AUTHORIZED TO COMPEL THE COMMISSION TO SEEK 
              SANCTIONS BY FILING CIVIL ACTIONS.

    ``(a) Termination of Administrative Proceeding.--In the case of any 
person who is a party to a proceeding brought by the Commission under a 
securities law, to which section 554 of title 5, United States Code, 
applies, and against whom an order imposing a cease and desist order 
and a penalty may be issued at the conclusion of the proceeding, that 
person may, not later than 20 days after receiving notice of such 
proceeding, and at that person's discretion, require the Commission to 
terminate the proceeding.
    ``(b) Civil Action Authorized.--If a person requires the Commission 
to terminate a proceeding pursuant to subsection (a), the Commission 
may bring a civil action against that person for the same remedy that 
might be imposed.
    ``(c) Standard of Proof in Administrative Proceeding.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of a proceeding 
brought by the Commission under a securities law, to which section 554 
of title 5, United States Code, applies, a legal or equitable remedy 
may be imposed on the person against whom the proceeding was brought 
only on a showing by the Commission of clear and convincing evidence 
that the person has violated the relevant provision of law.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004206EN.01000101.xml

| 14.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 August 2004

(2004/C 206/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2219 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6701 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2198 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5347 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,62 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,289 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5782 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,484 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6605 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4264 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4559 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,98 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,225 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 795 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7231 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6267 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5302 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8624 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1027 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 420,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9695 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2219

JPY

Japanese yen

136,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6701

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2198

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5347

ISK

Iceland króna

86,62

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,289

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5782

CZK

Czech koruna

31,484

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6605

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4264

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4559

ROL

Romanian leu

40 758

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,98

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,225

TRL

Turkish lira

1 795 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7231

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6267

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5302

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8624

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1027

KRW

South Korean won

1 420,15

ZAR

South African rand

7,9695

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004217EN.01000701.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 1 July 2004

in Case C-169/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten): Florian W. Wallentin v Riksskatteverket (1)

1

(Free movement of persons - Workers - Income tax - Restricted liability of a taxpayer receiving a small part of his income in one Member State and residing in another Member State)

(2004/C 217/12)

Language of the case: Swedish

In Case C-169/03: Reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Regeringsrätten (Sweden) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Florian W. Wallentin and Riksskatteverket — on the interpretation of Article 39 EC — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 July 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 39 EC precludes a Member State's legislation from providing that

| — | natural persons who are not regarded as being resident for tax purposes in that Member State, but who receive income there from employment, are subject to taxation levied at source such that the basic allowance or any other allowance or deduction linked to the taxpayer's personal circumstances is not granted, |
| --- | --- |

—

natural persons who are not regarded as being resident for tax purposes in that Member State, but who receive income there from employment, are subject to taxation levied at source such that the basic allowance or any other allowance or deduction linked to the taxpayer's personal circumstances is not granted,

| — | whereas taxpayers resident in that State are entitled to such allowances or deductions at the time of ordinary assessment to tax on their income received in that State and abroad, |
| --- | --- |

—

whereas taxpayers resident in that State are entitled to such allowances or deductions at the time of ordinary assessment to tax on their income received in that State and abroad,

| — | when the persons not resident in the State of taxation have had, in their own State of residence, only income which, by its nature, is not subject to income tax. |
| --- | --- |

—

when the persons not resident in the State of taxation have had, in their own State of residence, only income which, by its nature, is not subject to income tax.

---

(1)   OJ C 158 of 5.7.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OR
                    RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2005

                                                /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard W. Lucas
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael J. Dee        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | Michael J. Dee                                   
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | /s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | William C. Wiedel, Jr.                           
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 12, 2010 |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-431-CV

IN RE DAVID MICHAEL SHEID	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition is moot because the trial court granted relator’s bill of review in the underlying proceeding.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 20, 2009
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★
■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### Davis, by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Sage, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Thorson & Seymour*of Elkhorn.

For the respondent: *Jeffris, Mount, Oestreich, Avery & Wood*of Janesville.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region Federal. Aviation Administration Date I

# zlt.·r

# 1-w II I / 1AVicition Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Brendan Airways, LLC· 2011EA170024 Subject: Fjnal Notjce ofProposed Civj! Penalty Response Attachment


### In reply 

### to yourFinal Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty

## Brend~n Airways, LLCelects to

## pr~ceed as indicate.d by 

### its check

### n1ark beside the numbered paragraphbelow; · 

### l.U

## 2.~ Brendan Airways, LLC hereby submits the amount ofthe proposed civil penalty with the understanding that 

### an Order Assessing Civil Penalty will be issued in that amount.

. Brendan Airways, LLC hereby requests a fonnal hearing in accordance with Section 13.16 ofthe Federal Aviation Regu!ations. By sending this form to the Federal Aviation Administration, Eastern Reelon, Brendan Airways, LLC also hereby certifies that a copy ofthis form has been filed with the Hearlne Docket Clerk (Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S,W., Roo·m 924A, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk); 

## ** Please note that Brendan Airways LLC wjl! not be entitled to a hearing if it files tbjs form wjth the Federal Ayjatjon Admjnjstrat\on Eastern Regjon WITHOUT haying med tbjs foon or a. written request for a hearjng wjtb the HEARING DOCKET**~** . ATTORNEYIREPRESENTATIVE



# RECEIVED
JAN 13

# 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET
# C_2004170EN.01000201.xml

| 30.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3392 - WESTLB / KLÖCKNER)

(2004/C 170/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5.5.2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in english and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3392. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3392. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Marshall W. Pagon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Pegasus Communications Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the
annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K/A"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form
10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 20, 2004

/s/  Marshall W. Pagon
------------------------------
Name:  Marshall W. Pagon
Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





                                       8
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3569 — WENDEL/BUREAU VERITAS)

(2004/C 299/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 October 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.

Sirona
Holding GmbH, Bensheim, Germany

Sirona
Dental Services GmbH, Bensheim, Germany

Sirona
Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany

Sirona
Immobilien GmbH, Bensheim, Germany

Schick
Technologies Inc., New York

Sirona
Holding Inc., Delaware

Sirona
Dental Systems LLC, Delaware

Sirona
Dental Systems Ltd., London, England

Sirona
Dental Systems SAS, Paris, France

Sirona
Equipos Dentales Ibérica S.A., Barcelona, Spain

Sirona
Dental Systems K.K., Tokyo, Japan

Advanced
Technology Research ATR s.r.l., Pistoia, Italy

Sirona
Dental Systems (Foshan) Co. Ltd., China

Nitram
Dental a/s, Risskov, Denmark

SiCAT
Verwaltungs GmbH, Bonn, Germany

SiCAT
GmbH & Co.KG, Bonn, Germany

Sirona
Dental Systems Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd, China

Blitz
06-691 GmbH, Munich, Germany

Sirona
International Holding GmbH, Bensheim, Germany

Sirona
Dental Systems Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia

Cyfex
AG, Zurich, Switzerland (minority shareholding)

Sirona
Bermuda Hold Co, LLC

Sirona
Bermuda Holdings LP

Sirona
Dental GmbH

Sirona
Bermuda I Ltd.

Sirona
Bermuda II Ltd.

BlueX
Imaging s.r.l.

Sirona
Dental Systems s.r.l.

Sirona
Technologie GmbH & Co. KG

---



QuickLinks
# C_2005042EN.01002901.xml

| 18.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3666 — Nordic Capital/Plastal Holding)

(2005/C 42/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3666. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3666. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2004314EN.01000703.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/7

---

Action brought on 27 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-451/04)

(2004/C 314/14)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (1) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of them, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (1) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of them, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 31 December 2002.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 212 of 7.8.2001, p. 12.

1

---
#### Olson (Lawrence), Appellant, vs. McIver and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Brown, Pradt & Genrich*of Wausau.

For the respondents: *Sanborn, Lamoreux & Pmy*of Ashland.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
# C_2004228EN.01004201.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/42

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 June 2004

in Case T-123/03 Pfizer Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Medicinal products for human use - Initiation, under Article 30 of Directive 2001/83/EC, of the procedure under Article 32 of that directive - Application for annulment - Measure against which an action may be brought - Preparatory measure - Inadmissible)

(2004/C 228/95)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-123/03: Pfizer Ltd, established in Sandwich, Kent (United Kingdom), represented by D. Anderson QC, K. Bacon, Barrister, I. Dodds-Smith and T. Fox, Solicitors, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Støvlbaek and X. Lewis, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg ) — application for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 6 January 2003 initiating a referral to the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) in relation to Lopid under Article 30 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tilli and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 2 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171 of 19.7.2003.

1

---