alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004278EN.01002401.xml

| 13.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3553 — LOGISTA/ETINERA/TERZIA)

(2004/C 278/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 October 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CES’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3553. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CES’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3553. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 1, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and George G. Guthrie (the
"LENDER").

                                R E C I T A L S :


         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and Lender executed a Loan and
Pledge Agreement dated as of January 17, 2001 (the "LOAN DATE") in the amount of
125,000 dollars ($ 125,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to amend and modify the Loan
Agreement as of the Loan Date to clarify certain provisions.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. The ", or" shall be deleted
from the end of Section 3.5(i), and the following shall be added:

                  "or under substantially similar terms as those set forth in
                  this Agreement, or"

         2.       EFFECTIVE TIME OF AMENDMENT. The amendment and modification to
the Loan Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactively
effective as of the Loan Date.

         3.       NON-MODIFICATION. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the Loan Date.


                           WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.,


                           By:     /s/ Mark E. Patten
                               ---------------------------------------
                           Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer



                           LENDER


                           By:        /s/ George G. Guthrie
                              -----------------------------------------
                           Name:   George G. Guthrie, as Lender
                                ---------------------------------------
                           Title:
                                 --------------------------------------
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Access Road , Conservation Cover, Critical Area Planting, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Filter Strip, Grade Stabilization Structure, Hillside Ditch, Integrated Pest Management, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control, Land Smoothing, Mine Shaft & Adit Closing, Mulching, Nutrient Management, Obstruction Removal, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Sediment Basin, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,228,028
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,546,783
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,050,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,500,268
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,488,000
<LOANS>                                     47,558,612
<ALLOWANCE>                                    236,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,924,010
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,497,351
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,141,801
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,426,625
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,858,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              68,924,010
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,931,778
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              477,851
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               137,617
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,549,246
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             964,254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             965,151
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,584,095
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                660,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                950,273
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     950,273
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   598,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.56
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               230,860
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              236,860
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           236,860
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
pproved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111516 

I \II \lie\l&Ua I V 1-J I( 1-(:J ~ 

lllllllllllllYII 

~ NATIONAL. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C, 

THE NRO STAFF 11 June 196 

/ ~ 

MEMORANDUM FOR HOLDERS OF BYE-12678-69 

SUBJECT: Correction to BYE-12678-69, Satellite Image-Forming 

Reconnaissance Systems with Near Real-Time Return 

of Imagery 

Request holders of subject document make the following pen and 

ink change: 

Attachment 2, page 4, 4th and 3rd lines from the bottom 

should be changed,to read, 11 •• 1 and 20 X 10- 4 ft candle seconds ••• 11 

LEW ALLEN,· JR. 

Colonel, USAF 

BYEMAN /TALENT-KEYHOLE TOP SECRET CONTROL SYSTEM [XClUDCO FRON AUTOMATIC 1'!£GJtADING 

DOD Olft[CTIYIE 5200,tO 00[$ MOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111516 
.Ir.-. ---- ------ Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C0511151 /v/ I I - 'L' """ - -- -------

~ATIONAL. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

,. ,-, "' - I,,._._, 

E NRO STAFF l,~' _1.,_,, 

. MEMORANDUM FOR HOLDERS OF BYE-12678-69 

,...;..1, ... , '- • " 

SUBJECT: Addendum 

Subsequent to distribution of the above report, solid state sensor 

data have been obtained which result in more optimistic predictions for 

systems based on solid state sensor technology. In addition, Land Panel 

reviews of solid state sensor technology have resulted in considerable 

enthusiasm for systems based on these sensors. These developments 

are reflected in a recent estimate of system performance and cost, along 

with a configuration description forwarded by CIA/OSP for a representative system using a .solid state array sensor. 

Since a study is presently underway to develop a readout program 

recommendation to the ExCom, a complete rewrite of the document is 

not justified; rather, a one page addendum has been prepared based on\ 

the CIA/OSP data cited above and is forwarded herewith for insertion 

into the report. Users of the report should consider the addendum to be 

more representative of projected solid state technology th.an the data contained in the original report. 

Attachment 

Addendum 

LEW ALLEN, JR. 

Colonel, USAF 

C /{)m 

/, ,-. I fC '/-I 1../ · C 

CONTROL NO BYE-12678-69 't ,- .. ' -r' ' .. ; /TALENT-KEYHOLE TOP SECRET COPY _ _;z _ _./ OF • -:.L.--- COPIES ., • ____ ..,....,a,. 

CChi,H.,._ $Y!)i[M .EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 D1RECTIV£ 5200.10 OO(S NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111516 

PAGE--=l ____ o•_...;;1'-_ ••GEs 

( 

I
# C_2005106EN.01001301.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/13

---

Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order brought on 9 March 2005 by ALT Ylmy — Ömümcilik Paydarlar Jemgyyeti against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-4/05 SA)

(2005/C 106/25)

An application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 March 2005 by ALT Ylmy — Ömümcilik Paydarlar Jemgyyeti, represented by R. Nathan, avocat.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD — Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or in fact that the Commission, as garnishee, should not validly pay the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment creditor; |
| --- | --- |

—

lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD — Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or in fact that the Commission, as garnishee, should not validly pay the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment creditor;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                           ENSEC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                            YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                            1996                  1995
                                                       --------------        --------------
<S>                                                    <C>                   <C>
Loss from continuing operations                         $(6,881,840)          $(5,261,526)

Income from discontinued operations                              --             1,443,403
                                                       --------------        --------------

Loss applicable to common stock                         $(6,881,840)          $(3,817,923)
                                                       ==============        ==============

Weighted average shares outstanding                       4,045,908             3,500,000

Common stock equivalents(1)                                 177,500               404,896
                                                       --------------        --------------

Total weighted average common stock
   equivalents outstanding                                4,223,408             3,904,896
                                                       ==============        ==============

Earnings (loss) per common share:

   Continuing operations                                $     (1.63)          $     (1.35)

   Discontinued operations                                       --                   .37
                                                       --------------        --------------

Loss per common share                                   $     (1.63)          $      (.98)
                                                       ==============        ==============
</TABLE>
 
(1)  In accordance with SAB Topic 4(D), the weighted average common stock
     equivalents include options and warrants issued within one year of the
     Company's initial public offering with exercise prices below $6.00 per
     share for all periods presented as calculated under the treasury stock
     method.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF TRESCOM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AT SEPTEMBER
30, 1997, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,493
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,292
<PP&E>                                          35,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           501
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,627
<SALES>                                        116,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,395
<CGS>                                           90,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (4,818)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control, Access Road, Critical Area Planting, Dike, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Treatment Lagoon, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ending July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. VP of Finance &
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.





By /s/
Antonio Estrada Jr.


Antonio
Estrada Jr.


Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and


Principal
Financial Officer


October
8, 2010
# C_2004228EN.01003701.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/37

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 June 2004

in Case T-276/01: Mély Garroni v European Parliament (1)

1

(Officials - Auxiliary staff - Conference Interpreter - Article 74 of the conditions of employment of other staff - Termination of employment)

(2004/C 228/81)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-276/01: Mély Garroni, residing at Rome (Italy), represented by G. Vandersanden, lawyer, against the European Parliament (Agents: H. von Hertzen and J. de Wachter, with an address for service in Luxembourg) - application for, first, annulment of the decision to no longer employ Conference Interpreters aged 65 or more and, secondly, damages - the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; for the Registrar: J. Palacio Gonzalez, Principal Administrator, has given a judgment on 10 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the Parliament's decision of 24 January 2001 and the Parliament's decision of 20 July 2001 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Parliament's decision of 24 January 2001 and the Parliament's decision of 20 July 2001 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| 2. | Dismisses the rest of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the rest of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to bear all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to bear all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 3 of 5.1.2002.

1

---
#### Willoughby, Respondent, vs. Kuhl, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Portage county dated March 5, 1927: Byron B. Park, Judge.

Personal and property damage. Automobile collision. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *J. R. Pfiffner,*attorney, and *W. B. Murat,*of counsel, both of Stevens Point.

For the respondent: *T. A. Humphrey*of Mellen.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### Peoples Exchange Bank, Respondent, vs. Tobola and others, Defendants: Klich and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *H. G. Haight*of Neillsville... .

For the respondent: *J. F. Murry*of Thorp, attorney, and *Herman Leicht*of Medford of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
...f'S'INATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE. 

WASHINGTON, O.C, 

Dear Don: 

This is in response to your letter of January 23, 1969. It is 

encouraging to see the progress you are making in defining the 

needs of civil agencies for satellite photography. I certainly concur in the participation of the Naval Oceanographic Office personnel on your ·Marine Sciences Working Group. 

Dr. Donald H. Steininger 

Chairman, ARGO Steering Committee 

Executive Office of the President 

Sincerely, 

Alexander H. Flax 

Director 

wk..c-h 

-

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DDD DIRECTIVE 5200. l O DOES NOT APPLY 

CONTROLNO TCS-37564-69 

COPY 1 o, 2 co,in 

PAG[ 1 1 Of 1 PAGU \,,/ 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111780
# C_2004273EN.01002702.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/27

---

Removal from the register of Case C-457/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 273/52)

By order of 22 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-457/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo): Azienda Agricola Albergati Giovanni Angelo v A.G.E.A. (Agenzia Erogazioni in Agricoltura).

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 10.1.2004.

1

---