CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): 1113 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 06/18/2013

Rule Title(s): Architectural Coatings

Date Submitted to ARB: 7/18/2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 03/18/2003

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Barbara Lods Phone Number: (66 1) 723-8070 ext 3 E-mail Address: blods@avaqmd.ca .gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 are necessary to conform the rule to the CARB SCM for Architectur al Coatings, to comply with the CCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to attain the state air quality standards
as expeditiously as possible and to comply with the FCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to impos e RACT
for all existing major sources of air pollution

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2
(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and
planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 86

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) Table 1 and Table 2 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: Painting Practices Section (C)(6)

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C)(1) Work Prac tice Standards in Section(s): (C)(6)
Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) Rep orting Requirements in Section(s): (E)5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The potential environmental impacts of the SCM for Architectural Coatings on a statewide level were addressed by CARB in its Final Program Environmenta l Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for A rchitectural Coatings (June 2000). The analysis concluded that implementing the 2000 SCM would have no significant impacts, but would have a net air quality benefit. CARB believe s that the District can use the Technical Support D ocument and the EIR
from the 2000 SCM to support their environmental im pact analyses in adopting 1113 – Architectural Coat ings based on the

2007 SCM.