alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED January 21, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF A PPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE
ROGER P. HOGAN, FRED C. DANCE, ) and MUSIC CITY DUST -TEX ) SERVICE, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9712-CH-00733 VS. ) ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-2911-III COYNE INTERNATIONAL ) ENTERPRISES CORPORATION ) d/b/a COYNE TEXTILE SERVIC ES, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. ) 

### OPIN ION O N PE TITION TO R EHE AR
Both parties have filed petitions to rehear. With respect to the petition bythe sellers, we hav

e reviewed the petiti on and find that it does not state a ground for modification of the original opinion.

With respect to Coyne’s peti tion, we do not

think it requires a ch ange in result, but it does merit a specific response.

a. The chiefcomplaint in the petition is with thi s court’s conclusion that the sales contract was sever able. We have examined the cases cited i n t he petition, James Cable Partners, L.P. v. C ity of Jamestown, 818 S.W.2d 338 (Tenn. App. 1991), Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.L.P. v. Huddleston , 795 S.W.2 d 669 (Tenn. 1990), Green v. THGC, Inc. , 915 S.W.2d 809 (Tenn. App. 1995), and John Deere Plow Co. v. Shellabarger

, 203 S.W. 756 (Tenn. 1918), and do not find any authority contrary to our original opinion. In fact the definition for a divisi ble contract adoptedby the court in James seems to specifically des cribe the contract in thi s case: “one in which th e2

performance is divided into different groups, each set embracing performances which are the agreed exchange for each other.” 818 S.W.2d at 344. Coyne insisted that the contract be divided and Coyne assigned the v alues to each division. We do not see how a plausible argument

can be made at this point that the contrac t was not divisibl e. The petition does not address t he cases of Bradford & Carson v. Montgomery

Furniture Co. , 92 S.W. 1 104 (Tenn. 1906) and Young v. Jones , 255 S.W.2d 703 (Tenn. App. 1952). These cases add to the entire/se verable picture by establishing that for the breach of a severabl e contract the plaintiff has the bur den of proving how much damage resulted from the breach. That is the simple consequence of this whole exerci se. Coyne was en titled to r educe its payment by ev ery penny caused by Hogan’s breach. By failing to prove that it had sufferedany damages from Hogan’s breach, Coyne should pay the balance of the pur chase price.
b. Coyne’s petition to rehear also tak es issue withthis court’s reduction in the award of attorneys fees. We think our discussion in the original opinion properly disposed of this issue.

We are of the opinion, therefore, that both pe titions to rehear should be denied.

______________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, PRESIDIN G JUDGE, M.S.

______________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Fin & Feather Club, by and through Trustee, Kenneth Parten, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00006

- CV v.

Dale Leander and Don Leander, Appellee s Appeal from the 336th District Court of Fannin County, T exas (Tr. Ct. No. 37293 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

bel ow

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order t hat the appellant, Fin & Feather Club, by and through Trustee, Kenneth
Parten, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 16, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2005019EN.01000502.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 17 June 2004

in Case C-255/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Label of quality and origin - ‘Walloon label of quality’)

(2005/C 19/08)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-255/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C.-F. Durand and F. Simonetti) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) – application for a declaration that, by adopting and maintaining in force rules under which the ‘Walloon label of quality’ is granted to finished products of a certain quality manufactured or processed in Wallonie, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 17 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force rules under which ‘the Walloon label of quality’ is granted to finished products of a certain quality manufactured or processed in Wallonie, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force rules under which ‘the Walloon label of quality’ is granted to finished products of a certain quality manufactured or processed in Wallonie, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23.8.2003.

1

---
••

•

11•••••1

•••

r•••••• •••• • • .. • •••

•

' •. SEP 352

• •

11111111111111111 NOB 11111111C1111.

1111111111Cts of Photegreabie bamessienanee Marta'

la mind to the propeeal is yaw lettere (pi 6 &mat; I that every effort unsaid be aade to ablate weasiagtal et parftweinee limeesaiseasee ilyetorne. Ward this the Mee l Waw alveoli/ divested tart the Tine figuilrai UMW =Maw the original ampitives of

ant tabniating the eertnts be qpraity. weleeted phttagewpbie albeeianw Syr the of neameing

It la Mewed that this lila witll be melt Per grejeet divests@ See Os and lealwation of the various pro- mew. Swing for grojeet segineering sad asaagw. mat, these isdirldisin are in the best ponitios te analyse me mins*, the email meta= perfenneee. In oddities, by relying am these nanegeont tem for the analysis et eyeters perSanonee, they awe Inth e delay of e 'amities te moswood uulekly, eenrostim defieiameinot withal* mnaloatiag Mailed marts,

lbw weemstemee "pubes wafer devoleguent awe designed to art soseitlir regiaiwaesntes apprevef by • Una. tittles taw let-s 111.. effort is being MO to evaluate the sf Ors system without

netwally bseewing ievolved with the eatzaoties of latelligoase data. Par thig wesees, ea impertant &Oast to sew evaluation teekolopea wield he undo IS a aeries of studies were ooadootod vide)* enemas die Waal sage* of fatalities* isteeatioa. Per awriple, weermaiseenee spasm genii be evaluated _ saes She addeative viewpoint with detailed studies of 1011•014~14 =1411orlitiag targets of interest. la destirsat to the gealitative neememitie am& by AIIIMPON it amid be valuable to hew weefiew Ike MOD wader ewe einditione illudnatioa as it wogreende avowals types if target lafenwities.

. •

•

•••

•••• 1."1 r r ••••n••

o9-i 3- tH
tf

no lambdas' details et Ogee.. ether studies eau be repreeeatatives of ewe state so pee bre Irevard We sad, the import et pear oesoalastlea ordeal's la the lapreverst et111)-11111 tip emoreelatel. prides*. be

AIM V. Man

Ude" Seevetery el the Mr Fares

...90115

0911

•

SO

I!
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11



                           Visual Edge Systems Inc.
                        Computation of Per Share Loss



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            Year Ended
                                                                                           December 31,
                                                                                     -------------------------
                 Primary                                                              1996               1995
                                                                                      ----               ----
                 <S>                                                               <C>                 <C>
                 Weighted average common shares outstanding, exclusive             3,000,000           3,000,000
                   of issuances within twelve months prior to the IPO
                 
                 Shares issued within 12 months prior to the IPO                     220,000             220,000
                   assumed to be outstanding for the entire period
                 
                 
                 Weighted average common shares outstanding, for                     581,250                --
                   shares issued after IPO                                       -----------          ----------
                 
                 Weighted average common shares outstanding at end of year         3,801,250           3,220,000
                                                                                 ===========          ==========

                 Net loss                                                        $(2,397,690)         $ (464,963)
                                                                                 ===========          ==========
                 Net loss per share                                              $      (.63)         $     (.14)
                                                                                 ===========          ==========
                          
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Schick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Ronald Rosner, Director
of Finance and Administration of the Company, and its principal accounting
officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David B. Schick                    /s/ Ronald Rosner
-------------------------------        --------------------------------------
David B. Schick                        Ronald Rosner
Chief Executive Officer                Director of Finance and Administration
Schick Technologies, Inc.              (Principal Accounting Officer)
                                       Schick Technologies, Inc.

June 17, 2003                          June 17, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Schick Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Schick
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsPetition  for Rulemaking Dockets

# Petition for Rulemaking Dockets for 2007

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Open Petition for Rulemaking Dockets
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022
**Exhibit
        4.29**
 
 **FORM
        OF CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES**
 
 Houston,
        Texas
 
 **For
        value received,** ATSI,
        Inc., a Nevada Corporation (Maker), promises to pay to **Recap
        Marketing & Consulting LLP** (Holder)
        the principal sum of [amount] with interest from date at the rate of twelve
        percent (12%), per year, until applied to warrants converted under a separate
        agreement. Holder or Maker has the right to convert the Principal at the
        price
        per share (rate) identified in Exhibit 4.1 of the Consulting Agreement
        ("Conversion"). Such Conversion shall occur only after approval of a reverse
        split, and authorization by the SEC of the Maker, and approval by the Board
        of
        Directors, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
 
 Principal
        is payable in lawful money, or stock if converted, of the United States of
        America at 12000 Westheimer, Suite 340, Houston, Texas 77077, or at such
        place
        as may later be designated by written notice from the Holder to the Maker
        hereof, on the date and in the manner following:
 
 All
        principal and accrued interest is due on or before twelve (12) months from
        the
        date the principal amount is received. ****
 
 This
        Note
        is not secured, other than by conversion of warrants to common
        stock.
 
 Both
        parties understand that the amount or value above does not exceed the maximum
        interest allowed by law, under the statutes of the state of Texas, and
        acknowledge that the terms are reasonable given the nature of the
        loan.
 
 ATSI,
        Inc.
 a
        Nevada
        Corporation
 By: /s/
        Arthur L. Smith
 Arthur
        L.
        Smith
 Its
        President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 Amount: **$75,000** **** Received
        on: **May
        10, 2005** ****
 Amount: **$25,000** **** Received
        on: **July
        14, 2005** ****
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7079-7080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal

[[Page 7080]]

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2, that the National Research 
Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2015, in 
Room 730 at 810 Vermont Ave NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will 
convene at 9:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m., and is open to the public. 
Anyone attending must show a valid photo ID to building security and be 
escorted to the meeting. Please allow 15 minutes before the meeting 
begins for this process.
    The agenda will include a report from the Journal of Rehabilitation 
Research and Development sub-committee and comments from the VA 
Secretary.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Members of the public wanting to attend, 
or needing further information may contact Ms. Pauline Cilladi-Rehrer, 
Designated Federal Officer, Office of Research and Development (10P9), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, at (202) 443-5607, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#077766726b6e696229646e6b6b66636e2a75626f75627547716629606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acdccdd9c0c5c2c982cfc5c0c0cdc8c581dec9c4dec9deecdacd82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>. 
at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: February 4, 2015.
Rebecca Schiller,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-02567 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2005115EN.01002101.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 March 2005

in Case T-277/03 Dionysia Vlachaki, spouse of Petros Eleftheriadis v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Former auxiliary staff - Recovery of remuneration unduly paid after expiry of the contract - Interest on arrears - Action for annulment - Statement of reasons - Force majeure)

(2005/C 115/39)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case T-277/03: Dionysia Vlachaki, spouse of Petros Eleftheriadis, residing in Polydroso Amarousiou (Greece), represented by T. Sigalas, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: I. Dimitriou and G. Wilms, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment or partial variation of Commission decision C(2003)738 final of 25 March 2003 concerning the recovery of remuneration unduly paid to the applicant, a former auxiliary agent — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 1.11.2003.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Refining And Characterizing Heat Release Rates From Electrical Enclosures During Fire (RACHELLE-FIRE)(NUREG-2178)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20832 Summary Calendar

SHANDA NUNU,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

DEL-LAGO ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-3723)

March 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

t he reply brief and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her Memorandum and

Recommendation f iled under date of August 17, 1998, which was

adopted by the district judge pursuant to his Order filed under

date of September 3, 1998, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment that2

plaintiff, Shanda Nunu, take nothing against the defendan t, DelLago Estates Property Owners Association, and that this action be

dismissed with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
_ ~-;)·, .•. : :0,\ ~ 111111111"!1 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111561 ··--· - '111 •• ....,, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

N6 G 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14 00025936D 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY June 11, 1969 

1 

EARPOP 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Visit of Mr. Paul Visher, Hughes Aircraft Co. 

Mr. Paul Visher, of the Hughes Aircraft Co., visited me 

on June 5 to discuss his plan for using a gyrostat-stabilized 

space platform for a block two version of System 949. The 

gyrostat platform is now used in the tactical communication 

satellite! I 

I 

Mr. Visher left a report which describes the options in 

detail. Copies of this report were furnished the Air Staff, 

Dr. Yarymovych, and Generals Berg and Martin for their evaluation. 

Mr. Visher stated that two satellites could be used for 

the 949 function. Two could be placed in an elliptic orbit, 

each collecting information and transmitting it directly to a 

station in the United States. 

Another possible system configuration is to place one of 

the satellites (the c,>-_lector) in a synchronous orb ~ and place 

the other configure~ as a data relay system also in~ synchronous orbit. The R&D costs for the two elliptic sat~_lites 

would be cheaper than the second configur2Lion becaus~ the 

latter requires he development of two sepG~ate types of vehicles. The seconc ~ption would have the advantage of providing 

a data relay system useful for many oc.:ner functions than the 

949 application. The next step is to await the evaluation of 

the Air Staff, SAFRD and SAFSS (assisted by SAFSP). 

cc: Mr. Hans.en 

Mr. Davis 

,,.) , . L- •/1 t-Lc ,, 

John L. McLucas 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111561
# C_2005106EN.01002205.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/22

---

Removal from the register of Case C-549/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 106/51)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 16 December 2004, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-549/03: European Parliament v Council of the European Union supported by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.02.2004.

1

---