alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  592,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    152,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,185
<PP&E>                                         440,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,243,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,548,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          170,133
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,858
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,483,116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,243,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,912,028
<CGS>                                        1,231,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,196,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (537,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (539,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                336,785
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (202,993)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
33.1


CERTIFICATION REPORT





Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





The company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.





Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.





Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.





Date: March 31, 2010                                                        By: /s/
Joseph M. Cummins


Joseph M. Cummins


President, Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 31, 2010                                                        By: /s/
Bernard Cohen


Bernard Cohen


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.44

February 28, 2002


Craig Muir
Vice President, Platform Technology
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
75 Sidney Street
Cambridge,  MA  02139


RE:     Amendment Number 2 to Technology Access and Applications Development
        Agreement between Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Caliper
        Technologies Corp. effective March 24, 2000

Dear Craig:

        Reference is made to the Technology Access and Applications Development
Agreement by and between Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("MPI") and Caliper
Technologies Corp. ("Caliper") effective as of March 24, 2000, as amended
effective December 18, 2001 (collectively, the "Agreement").Capitalized terms
used in this Amendment Number 2 (the "Amendment No. 2") but not defined shall
have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

        The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to evidence the agreement of MPI
and Caliper to extend the term of the Agreement to permit the continuation of
ongoing Feasibility NAP Plans and to continue to negotiate in good faith, the
terms of the Definitive Agreement.

1.      Extension of Term.

        Pursuant to Section 10.5 of the Agreement, the Agreement shall expire on
June 30, 2002

2.      General.

        Except as expressly modified by this Amendment No. 2, all other terms
and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The
Agreement and this Amendment No. 2 constitute the entire and only agreement
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and all prior and
interim negotiations, representations, agreements and understandings are
superseded by the Agreement and this Amendment No. 2.

        This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original but all of such together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.



<PAGE>

        Please signify your agreement with the foregoing terms by countersigning
this Amendment No. 2 in the space provided below.

                                    Sincerely Yours,

                                    CALIPER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                                    By: /s/ Michael R. Knapp
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: Michael R. Knapp
                                    Title: VP Corporate Development

                                    Agreed to:

                                    MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Craig D. Muir
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: Craig D. Muir
                                    Title: Vice-President, Platform Technology
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111708 

1111111111111111111111 lllli 111111111111111 IIIII 1111111111 lll llll 14 00078183D 

August 28, 1969 

Captain Meceda 

called to say that he is sort of running out of '-----~~~-~ time on a decision as to how to dispose of the substantial quantities 

of both materials in Toledo. These quantities, of course, are those 

that we obtained program-wise befo~owing the GSA/OEP 

stocks which we have now returned. L__Jtells me he asked you to 

check into the possibilities of disposing of this material in some 

appropriate way. Of course, Toledo would like to have the materials 

at a bargain price and= can't very well arrange a sale for less 

than market price. This 1s also true for our other glass contractor 

who he is sure would also like to buy at some bargain price which 

we couldn't really legally negotiate. ~~~feels that the most 

appropriate thing to do is to dispose of it in some legal, above-board 

manner. 

Please help him out. He needs to close out Toledo this coming 

month. ~ lisn't available when vou have some information and 

are ready to tal~se contact\ \on the GX at 

643-0750. I tolq_________Jthat you would check this one out on Tuesday 

when you return. 

• YOST 

USAF 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111708
The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern 1 District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4237

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jesus Garcia-Chavez, also known as * Northern District of Iowa. Luis Hernandez-Chavez, also known * as Luis Hernandez-Gomez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 3, 1997 Filed: August 18, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jesus Garcia-Chavez challenges the sentence impos ed by the district court after 1 he pl eaded guilty to illegal re-entry of the United States following deportation, i n violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We affirm. The presentence report (PSR) calculated a total offense level of 21, including a sixteen-level enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(2)-2-

(19 95) (enhancement applies if defendant deported after conviction for "aggravate d felo ny"), because Garcia-Chavez had been deported based on a Nebraska felon y conviction fo r possessing over one pound of marijuana, which the PSR indicated was an aggravated felony. At sentencing, Garcia-Chavez argued, among other things, that the Nebraska conviction fell outside the "heartland of cases" for which the enhancement was intended, and that the district court therefore had discretion under Koon v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 2035, 2045, 2047 (1996), to depart from the Guidelines. The district court re fused to depart, and sentenced Garcia-Chavez to 46 months imprisonment, to be followed by two years supervised release unless Garcia is first deported upo n completing his 46-month sentence.
On app eal, Garcia-Chavez contends the district court erred by determining i t lacked authority to depart downward under Koon . After carefully reviewing th e sentencing transcript, however, we conclude that th e court believed it had the authority to depart, but determined departure was not warranted here. Thus, the district court's departure decision is unreviewable. See United States v. Field , 110 F.3d 587, 591 (8th Cir. 1997) (appellate court may not review district court's decision not to depart i f district court was aware of its departure authority). A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Aquaculture Ponds, Critical Area Planting, Diversion, Livestock Pipeline, Pond, Pumping Plant, Roofs and Covers, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Watering Facility.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Disposition of Public Comments on the Draft Subsequent License Renewal Guidance Documents NUREG–2191 and NUREG–2192 (NUREG-2222)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2222 (PDF – 2.59 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2017**Date Published:** December 2017

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document is a knowledge management and knowledge transfer document associated with NUREG–2191, "Generic Aging Lessons Learned for Subsequent License Renewal (GALL-SLR) Report," and NUREG–2192, "Standard Review Plan for Review of Subsequent License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants" (SRP-SLR).

This document contains the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's analysis of the public comments received on the drafts of NUREG–2191 and NUREG–2192. Public comment drafts of the GALL-SLR Report and the SRP-SLR were published on December 15, 2015, with the public comment period expiring on February 29, 2016. A supplement to the draft subsequent license renewal guidance documents was published on March 29, 2016, with the public comment period expiring on May 31, 2016. The disposition of comments that the NRC staff agreed with and used as the basis for instituting a change to either the GALL-SLR Report or the SRP-SLR are detailed in this document. In addition, the public comments that did not result in a change to either NUREG are also dispositioned, and the staff's technical basis for not agreeing with these comments is presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### African Development Foundation

# AGENCY:

United States African Development Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The US African Development Foundation (USADF) will hold its quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors to discuss the agency's programs and administration.

# DATES:

The meeting date is Wednesday, February 18th, 2015, 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is 1400 I Street Northwest, Suite #1000 (Main Conference Room), Washington, DC 20005-2246.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rabayah Akhter, 202-233-8811.

Authority: Pub. L. 96-533 (22 U.S.C.§ 290h).

Dated: February 3, 2015.

Doris M. Martin,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-02675 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
# C_2004179EN.01001702.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/17

---

Action brought on 13 May 2004 by Luigi Marcuccio against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-176/04)

(2004/C 179/34)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 May 2004 by Luigi Marcuccio, represented by Alessandro Distante, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority rejecting his request; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority rejecting his request;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action was brought by the applicant as a result of the fact that, on 1 April 2003, he submitted a request to the Commission in the following terms: (a) if a medical report drawn up by Dr M.P. Simonnet on the occasion of the medical check up which the Commission required him to undergo on 20 June 2002 exists, to have a certified copy thereof sent to him or to a doctor designated by him and, in the latter case, that he should be informed thereof in writing; (b) if the medical report does not exist, to be informed of that fact in writing; (c) if there is any reason to deny the requests at (a) and (b) above, to be informed thereof in writing.

Following the implied rejection of the request, the applicant brought the present action.

In support of his arguments, the applicant puts forward the following pleas in law:

Breach of the law inasmuch as the official is entitled to have access to all data relating to him drawn up by agents of the defendant in the course of their duties and in their possession, and thus including the medical report.

Breach of the applicant's right to health, in particular to his physical and mental health and of the institution's duty to have regard for his welfare.

Breach of the obligation to provide reasons for decisions, as provided for in Article 25 of the Staff Regulations.

Breach of the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials, inasmuch as the defendant had not the slightest regard for the interest of the applicant to have access to the medical report, or at least for such a report to be transmitted to a doctor of his choice, in particular in light of the fact that it is impossible to discern what interest of the service the defendant sought to protect, quod non, by its rejection of the request and of the complaint.

---
# C_2004131EN.01000101.xml

| 7.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 May 2004

(2004/C 131/01)

1 euro ==

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2116 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4419 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6746 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,106 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5494 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,97 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,161 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9462 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5865 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 32,201 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6566 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4266 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7701 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 448 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,115 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 769 156 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6595 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6682 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4499 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9111 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0455 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 412,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,29 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2116

JPY

Japanese yen

132,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4419

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6746

SEK

Swedish krona

9,106

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5494

ISK

Iceland króna

88,97

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,161

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9462

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5865

CZK

Czech koruna

32,201

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6566

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4266

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7701

ROL

Romanian leu

40 448

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,115

TRL

Turkish lira

1 769 156

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6595

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6682

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4499

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9111

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0455

KRW

South Korean won

1 412,79

ZAR

South African rand

8,29

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004299EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 December 2004

(2004/C 299/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3300 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4300 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9510 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5273 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,65 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5794 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,788 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6858 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4317 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1744 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 37 209 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,81 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,054 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 882 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7204 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3378 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8579 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1800 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 390,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7592 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3300

JPY

Japanese yen

137,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4300

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69010

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9510

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5273

ISK

Iceland króna

83,65

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5794

CZK

Czech koruna

30,788

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6858

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4317

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1744

ROL

Romanian leu

37 209

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,81

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,054

TRL

Turkish lira

1 882 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7204

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3378

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8579

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1800

KRW

South Korean won

1 390,38

ZAR

South African rand

7,7592

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Szychulski (Alice), by Anton Szychulski, her next friend, Appellant, vs. Miller, Respondent.

For the appellant: *-Raymond J. Cannon,*attorney, and *John L. Newman*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Thomas B. Torphy*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.