alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02763]



[[Page 7671]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 requires federal agencies to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed 
collection of information before submission to OMB, and to allow 60 
days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice complies 
with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before April 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Renee Mascarenas, Financial Specialist, 
Denver Finance Center, Small Business Administration, 721 19th Street, 
3rd Floor, Denver, CO 80202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Mascarenas, Financial 
Specialist, Denver Finance Center, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d3f2823282863202c3e2e2c3f28232c3e0d3e2f2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ae8fff4ffffb4f7fbe9f9fbe8fff4fbe9dae9f8fbb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a> 303-844-
7179, or Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#197a6c6b6d706a376b707a71596a7b78377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddec8cfc9d4ce93cfd4ded5fdcedfdc93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SBA Form 172 is only used by lenders for 
loans that have been purchased by SBA and are being serviced by 
approved SBA lending partners. The lenders use the SBA Form 172 to 
report loan payment data to SBA on a monthly basis. The purpose of this 
reporting is to (1) show the remittance due SBA on a loan serviced by 
participating lending institutions (2) update the loan receivable 
balances.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    SBA is requesting comments on (a) Whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Summary of Information Collection

    Title: Transaction Report on Loans Serviced by Lender.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Lenders.
    Form Number: SBA Form 172.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 4,724.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 4,130.

Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2015-02763 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2004118EN.01005203.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/52

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-320/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 118/114)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 23 March 2004, the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-320/99, W.R. Milder supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 63 of 4.3.2000.

1

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,148-01

EX PARTE JAMES JACOB YBARRA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1437328-A

IN THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance less than

one gram and sentenced to twelve days’ imprisonment in county jail. Applicant filed this application

for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he did not know of the bad acts of

the officer who implicated him in this alleged offense. The State and the trial court agree that

Applicant’s plea was involuntary. Ex parte Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022); Ex

parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The State and the trial court both recommend
granting relief. We agree. Applicant is entitled to relief. 

Relief is granted. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). The judgment in Cause No.

143732801010 in the 174

th

Judicial District Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is

remanded to the Harris County Sheriff to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial

court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: January 10, 2024

Do Not Publish
# C_2004262EN.01000801.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 7 September 2004

in Case C-469/02: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Career break benefit - Residence condition - Indirect discrimination based on nationality - Article 39 EC - Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 - Article 73 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71)

(2004/C 262/15)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-469/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 23 December 2002, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: H. Michard) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: A. Snoecx, then by E. Dominkovits) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues ande R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by making the granting and payment of a benefit under the career-break benefit scheme subject to the condition that the person concerned is habitually resident in Belgium, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its duties under Article 39 EC, Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, Article 73 of Council Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by making the granting and payment of a benefit under the career-break benefit scheme subject to the condition that the person concerned is habitually resident in Belgium, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its duties under Article 39 EC, Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, Article 73 of Council Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996;

| 2. | Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

1

---
# C_2005031EN.01001701.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/17

---

Action brought on 15 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-516/04)

(2005/C 31/34)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 15 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly and R. Troosters, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/51/EC of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/51/EC of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the Directive into national law expired on 11 February 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 187, 10.7.2001, p. 45.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2158 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 

and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 

Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 

the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Ms. NORTON, Ms. LEE, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. KEATING, Mr. 

HASTINGS, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

LANGEVIN, Mr. SANFORD, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. RASKIN, 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mr. PRICE of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit 

oil-, gas-, and methane hydrate-related seismic activities 

in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and 

Straits of Florida planning areas of the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atlantic Seismic 

5 Airgun Protection Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2158 IH

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE HY2 DRATE-RELATED SEISMIC ACTIVITIES IN 

3 NORTH ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH AT4 LANTIC, AND STRAITS OF FLORIDA PLAN5 NING AREAS OF OUTER CONTINENTAL 

6 SHELF. 

7 Section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

8 (43 U.S.C. 1340) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(i) MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE

11 HYDRATE-RELATED SEISMIC ACTIVITIES IN NORTH AT12 LANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH ATLANTIC, AND STRAITS

13 OF FLORIDA PLANNING AREAS.—Notwithstanding any 

14 other provision of law, no person or agency of the United 

15 States may conduct geological or geophysical activities (as 

16 those terms are described in the final programmatic envi17 ronmental impact statement of the Bureau of Ocean En18 ergy Management entitled ‘Atlantic OCS Proposed Geo19 logical and Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South 

20 Atlantic Planning Areas’ and completed February 2014) 

21 in support of oil, gas, or methane hydrate exploration or 

22 development in any area located in the North Atlantic, 

23 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, or Straits of Florida plan24 ning areas of the outer Continental Shelf.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2004118EN.01005002.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/50

---

Action brought on 29 March 2004 by Carla Piccinni-Leopardi against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-128/04)

(2004/C 118/108)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 29 March 2004 by Carla Piccinni-Leopardi, residing in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission decision of 14 April 2003 inasmuch as it fixes the classification at recruitment of the applicant at the second step of her grade, reviews and fixes 1 April 1999 as the date for her classification at Grade A5, Step 3, and restricts the pecuniary effects of its decision to 5 October 1995; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision of 14 April 2003 inasmuch as it fixes the classification at recruitment of the applicant at the second step of her grade, reviews and fixes 1 April 1999 as the date for her classification at Grade A5, Step 3, and restricts the pecuniary effects of its decision to 5 October 1995;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas put forward in the present case are the same as those relied on in Case T-402/03 Katalagarianakis v Commission (OJ 2004 C 35, p. 17).

---
*May 12, 1931.*

#### Carlson, as Special Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Wangen, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Hanitch, Hartley, Johnson & Fritschler*of Superior.

For the respondent: *Curran & Sher*of Superior.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004268EN.01000301.xml

| 4.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 November 2004

(2004/C 268/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2705 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4329 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6916 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0422 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5317 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,72 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,178 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5768 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,466 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,67 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6737 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4303 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3072 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 440 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,915 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 873 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7046 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5559 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8868 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8552 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1186 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,845 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2705

JPY

Japanese yen

135,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4329

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6916

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0422

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5317

ISK

Iceland króna

87,72

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,178

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5768

CZK

Czech koruna

31,466

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,67

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6737

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4303

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3072

ROL

Romanian leu

40 440

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,915

TRL

Turkish lira

1 873 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7046

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5559

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8868

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8552

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1186

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,48

ZAR

South African rand

7,845

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room Cc-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02620 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsTechnical Letter Reports

# Technical Letter Reports – 2020

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50428) pertaining to the registration of $100.0
million of Onyx common stock, (b) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-
56620) pertaining to the registration of 337,925 shares of Onyx common stock,
(c) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72235) pertaining to the Onyx
Software Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and
Restated 1994 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and the
1998 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, (d) Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-55414) pertaining to the Onyx Software 2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock
Compensation Plan, two Stock Option Agreements, each dated January 5, 2001,
between Onyx Software Corporation and Kevin Corcoran and the Stock Option
Agreement, dated January 30, 2001, between Onyx Software Corporation and Leslie
Rechan, and (e) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-63214) pertaining to
the Onyx Software 2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock Compensation Plan; of our
report dated January 29, 2001, except for paragraph 4 of Note 15 as to which
the date is February 12, 2001 and Note 1, as to which the date is August 10,
2001, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Onyx Software
Corporation included in Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 16, 2001
HomePublic InvolvementConferences & SymposiaRegulatory Information Conference

# [Page Title]

[Page Content]

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, September 21, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Online Registration Form
          - Purpose of the RIC
          - General Information
          - Hotel Information
          - Travel Information
          - Program Agenda
          - Commission Speakers
          - Special Sessions
          - Technical Sessions At-a-Glance
          - Digital Exhibits
          - READY, SET, RESPOND!!!!—NRC Operations Center Tours
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Past RIC Information
          - Contact Us
          - Conference Feedback
          - Online Registrants List

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan