alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Millennium
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Ronald J. Corsentino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 23, 2003                            /s/ Ronald J. Corsentino
                                             ------------------------
                                             Ronald J. Corsentino
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Accounting Officer)

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMERICAN MILLENNIUM CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSDIARIES AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY AMERICAN MILLENNIUM CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIAIRES AND FURNISHED
TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Argued and submitted February 14,

affirmed as modified September 28,

reconsideration allowed, former opinion (66 Or App 191, 672 P2d 1262 (1983)) adhered to as modified December 14, 1983, petition for review denied January 17, 1984 (296 Or 350)

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of REX, *Respondent, and*REX, *Appellant.*

(405-891; CA A24886)

669 P2d 387

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Brown, Burt, Swanson, Lathen & Alexander, Salem.

Janet A. Metcalf, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was English & Metcalf, Portland.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge,* and Rossman, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

*

 Joseph, C. J., *vice*Warren, J.

*727PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from an order modifying the child support provisions of a decree entered in 1974. The trial court, applying the method for determining child support established in *Smith v. Smith,*290 Or 675, 626 P2d 342 (1981), found that his monthly obligation for the support of each of the parties’ two children should be increased from $150 to $342 per child. Our review of the record shows that there has been a change of circumstances sufficient to warrant modification; however, by applying the *Smith*formula to the relevant facts, we have determined that the decree should be modified to require father to pay $290 per month for the support of each child instead of the amount ordered by the trial court. The decree is modified accordingly and affirmed as modified. Costs to respondent.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors

Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-157576, 333-142798, 333-140555, 333-106237, 333-83488 and 333-46825) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-153092) on Form S-3 ofSirona Dental Systems, Inc. of our reports dated December 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statementsof income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,2009, which reports appear in the September 30, 2009, annual report on Form 10-K of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. 

KPMG AGWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft 

Frankfurt, Germany 

December 4, 2009
# C_2004239EN.01002901.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/29

---

(2004/C 239/65)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 228, 11.9.2004

Past publications

OJ C 217, 28.8.2004

OJ C 201, 7.8.2004

OJ C 190, 24.7.2004

OJ C 179, 10.7.2004

OJ C 168, 26.6.2004

OJ C 156, 12.6.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
# C_2005031EN.01000302.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-219/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Tax on capital gains)

(2005/C 31/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-219/03 the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Diaz-Llanos La Roche and L. Escobar Guerrero) v Kingdom of Spain (Agents: L. Fraguas Gadea) –action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 19 May 2003 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, with regard to the tax on capital gains made since 1 January 1997 on transfers of shares purchased prior to 31 December 1994, by maintaining in force a tax regime which is less favourable to shares quoted on markets other than Spanish regulated markets than to shares quoted on the latter markets, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and the corresponding Articles 36 and 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, with regard to the tax on capital gains made since 1 January 1997 on transfers of shares purchased prior to 31 December 1994, by maintaining in force a tax regime which is less favourable to shares quoted on markets other than Spanish regulated markets than to shares quoted on the latter markets, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and the corresponding Articles 36 and 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          $ 2,228,445
<SECURITIES>                     37,616,310
<RECEIVABLES>                    27,389,376
<ALLOWANCES>                     (1,384,837)
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                               39,938
<DEPRECIATION>                      (35,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   66,651,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               343,293
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                       66,307,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     66,651,096
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,347,803
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    129,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,218,194
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,218,194
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,218,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
WREP FY 2023 Proposal Template 

**Executive Summary (limited to 2 pages) include:**

· **Project title**

· **Project description**

· **Lead director with contact info**

· **Partners**

· **Total acres**

· **Total budget (federal and non)**

**Responses to Ranking Criteria Questions (limit responses to 1 page each)**

1. Describe how the partner(s) will provide administrative support for processing WRE applications-may include; assist NRCS field staff with completing all required forms for the program; determine land and landowner eligibility; acquire and evaluate Environmental Due Diligence reports; acquire boundary surveys or appraisals for offered easement areas-per NRCS specifications.

2. Describe how the partner(s) will provide technical services which may include planning and/or design of the WRE project restoration-per NRCS specifications.   (NRCS will spot check only)

3. Describe how the partner(s) will provide administrative and/ or technical support which may include; acquire restoration contractors, complete permitting requirements or complete construction oversight and design check out-per NRCS specifications.   (NRCS will spot check only)

4. Partners have identified areas with high HU landowners in project area and will provide focused outreach to them including workshops or one-on-one conversations to explain the Agricultural Land Easement and Wetland Reserve Easement Components of the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program.  Partner will assist landowner in determining whether WRE or ALE is the best fit for their property and goals.  To get full points for this partner will need to show they have identified HU landowners and engaged with local partners able to hold an ALE.

5. Describe how you will assist HU applicants with completing application materials.

6. Describe how you will assist HU applicants with resolving unacceptable title encumbrances to ensure project can move forward including ensuring offered areas have appropriate legal access; review title and all exceptions and work to clear title encumbrances that are not compatible with a WRE prior to acquisition.

7. Describe how you will assist HU applicants with resolving Heir's property issues.

8. Describe how the proposal specifically address habitat needs in a location within one of the initiative areas on the FY 2022 Conservation Initiatives Map and describe how it will benefit the goals and objectives of the initiative.

9. Describe how the proposal will improve habitat for migratory birds and other wetland-dependent wildlife.

10. Describe how the proposal will provide direct benefits to wetland dependent Federal or State listed T&E species.

11. Describe in detail how you have engaged with a local HU focused entity to collaborate on providing outreach to HU landowners.  This must be documented by letter of support from a local HU focused entity that briefly describes planned collaboration.

· **Maps & Attachments**

· **Budget Table & Timeline**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus WILLIAM EUGENE YOUNG, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-98-5) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Wray, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sharon Burnham, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Eugene Young, Jr., appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a ten-month sentence on the ground that he violated the conditions of his supervised release by failing to submit truthful and complete monthly supervision reports, f ailing to notify the probation officer ten days prior to changing his residence, and failing to notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer. Finding no error, we affirm. This court reviews a district court's judgment revoking supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Ci r. 1995). In exercising this discretion, the district court must consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). See18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e) (West 2000 & Supp.2005). The district court abuses its discretion when it fails or refuses to exercise its discretion or when its exercise of discretion is flawed by an erroneous legal or factual premise. See James v. Jacobson , 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 1993). To revoke supervised release, the district court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Young’s supervised release.- 3 - Before United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), we reviewed a sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. Davis , 53 F.3d at 642. This court has not yet decided whether, after Booker , the proper standard is reasonableness. However, Young’s revocation sentence was within the advisory Chapter 7 revocation range of 7-13 months and can be affirmed under either standard. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment revoking Young’s supervised release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.13(20)

                                 ADDENDUM NO. 5

                                       to

                        QUOTA SHARE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT
                           EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1ST 2000

                                     between

                 SUPERIOR INSURANCE COMPANY AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED
                              INSURANCE SUBSIDARIES
                        (hereafter called the "Company")

                                       and

                    NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
                                 PITTSBURGH, PA.
                       (hereafter called the "Reinsurer")



Notwithstanding  the  condition  of Article VII COMMUTATION it is understood and
agreed that all liabilities emanating from losses on business effective prior to
January  1st,  2002  are  commuted  effective September 30, 2002.  The Reinsurer
shall allow a payment equal to the amount of funds in the Funds Withheld Balance
on  September  30,  2002.  The  Company  is granted permission to withdraw those
funds and agrees to forever release and discharge the Reinsurer from any and all
liabilities  whether  past,  present  or  future  on policies effective prior to
January  1st,  2002.  It  is  understood  that no further reports are due to the
Reinsurer  for  this  business.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF:  the  parties  hereto  have  caused  this  Agreement to be
executed  by  their  authorized  representative:


In:_______________________________this___________day  of__________________2002


                           SUPERIOR INSURANCE COMPANY

By:_______________________________Title:______________________________

And  in:____________________________this___________day of___________________2002

             NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA

By:_______________________________Title:_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2014-0034; OMB No. 1660-0040]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; Correction; Extension of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 11, 2014, the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) published an agency information collection notice in the Federal 
Register at 79 FR 73604. In the ADDRESSES section, FEMA inadvertently 
listed the docket ID in (1) Online as FEMA-2013-0034. The correct 
Docket ID is FEMA 2014-0034. Because of the error, FEMA is also 
extending the comment deadline. The comment deadline has been extended 
from February 9, 2015 to February 16, 2015.

    Dated: February 4, 2015.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-02549 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-53-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-44141, Form S-3 No. 333-40451 and Form S-8 dated October 9,
1997) of Arden Realty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
February 2, 1999 (except for Note 7, as to which the date is March 9, 1999),
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Arden
Realty, Inc. included in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 23, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9019-4]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7146 or                     *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 01/26/2015 Through 01/30/2015

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​eisdata.html.*

*EIS No. 20150027, Revised Final EIS, USFWS, AK,*                     Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Review Period Ends: 03/09/2015, Contact: Stephanie Brady 907-306-7448.                

## Amended Notices

*EIS No. 20140311, Draft EIS, BLM, 00,*                     Southeastern States Draft Resource Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: Gary Taylor 601-977-5413.                 

Revision to FR Notice Published 10/31/2014; Extending Comment Period from 1/29/2015 to 03/16/2015.

*EIS No. 20140371, Draft EIS, USACE, CA,*                     South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Phase I, Comment Period Ends: 02/23/2015, Contact: William DeJager 415-503-6866.                

Revision to FR Notice Published 12/19/2014; Extending the Comment Period from 02/02/2015 to 02/23/2015.

      ( print page 6706)    
Dated: February 3, 2015.

Cliff Rader,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2015-02472 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1170 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1170

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
            breast cancer research, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
            breast cancer research, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Breast Cancer Research Stamp 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2019''.

SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL POSTAGE STAMP SALES 
              ARE USED FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is amended in 
the matter following subparagraph (B) by adding at the end the 
following: ``An agency that receives amounts from the Postal Service 
under this paragraph shall use the amounts for breast cancer 
research.''.
                                 <all>
```