alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005031EN.01001201.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling of 26 November 2004, from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in the case of A.C. Smits-Koolhoven against Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-495/04)

(2005/C 31/23)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) of 26 November 2004, received at the Court Registry on 1 December 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of A.C. Smits-Koolhoven against Staatssecretaris van Financiën on the following question:

Do herbal cigarettes of the type in issue in the present case, which it is established do not contain any substances having a medicinal effect, but which, with the approval of the Netherlands Council for the Monitoring of Medicinal Product Advertising/Council for the Monitoring of Health Product Advertising, are sold as ‘Medicinal herbal cigarettes’ as an aid in giving up smoking, come under the exemption which Article 7(2) of Council Directive 95/59/EC (1) of 27 November 1995 provides for products which are used exclusively for medical purposes?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 291, 6.12.1995, p. 40.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Georges Benarroch, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gilla Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequentto the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.         Date: November 9, 2007           By: /s/ Georges Benarroch             Georges Benarroch      Acting President & Chief Executive Officer      And Acting Chief Financial Officer  
17
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00049

- CR

R ODRICK L AWRENCE H URST

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1461897D)

July 30 , 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp )

JUDGMENT

Thi s court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ / s/ Mark T. Pittman

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

______ Justice Mark T. Pittman
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I, Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.








Date: February 11, 2005
By:
/s/ Gilbert HuName:
Gilbert HuTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                AMERITRUCK DISTRIBUTION CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                  (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,         September 30,
                                          --------------------  -------------------
                                            1996*      1995*      1996*     1995*
                                          ---------  ---------  ---------  --------
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes and
   extraordinary loss                        $  125     $1,722    $  (516)   $4,972
                                             ------     ------    -------    ------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense and amortization of
   debt discount and premium on all
   indebtedness                               4,523      1,030     12,166     2,539

  Portion of rent under long-term
   operating leases representative of an
   interest factor                              374        161      1,133       276
 
  Preferred stock dividend requirements
   of consolidated subsidiaries                   -         97          -       266
                                             ------     ------    -------    ------
     Total fixed charges                      4,897      1,288     13,299     3,081
                                             ------     ------    -------    ------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed
 charges                                     $5,022     $3,010    $12,783    $8,053
                                             ======     ======    =======    ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  (1)       1.03x      2.34x          -     2.61x
                                             ======     ======    =======    ======
 
</TABLE>
(1) The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $516
    for the nine month period ended September 30, 1996.



* Comparisons between periods are affected by acquisitions - see Note 2
  contained in the unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Animal Trails and Walkways, Fence, Fish Passage, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Streambank and Shoreline Protection.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
**Exhibit 1.3**

**      Following is the text of Article 5 of the bylaws of the company as amended on November 8, 2004 and currently in effect, which replaces in its entirety former article 5.**

> 
***“Article 5****.- The capital stock of the Company is of S/.2,152,455,521.25 (Two billion, one hundred and fifty two million, four hundred and fifty five thousand, five            hundred and twenty one 25/100 nuevos soles), evidenced by 1,721,964,417 bearer shares of S/.1.25 each, fully paid for, subscribed and divided into three different classes, as set forth herein below:*

*a). 669,762,378 Class A-1 shares;*

*b). 1,051,925,807          Class B shares, and*

*c). 276,232 Class C shares.*

*All of the Classes of shares are entitled to the same rights and obligations, except as set forth under article 27 of Company’s bylaws.*

*The exercise of the preemptive right to subscribe new shares is governed by Article 208 of the General Law of Companies (“Ley General de Sociedades”) and other applicable regulations. The inclusion of this        preemptive right with respect to negotiable instruments is governed by article 209 of said law and by other applicable regulations.*

*Class C shares correspond to contributions individually made by employees of the Company, Class B shares held or acquired from third parties by employees of the Company can be also be exchanged for Class C shares.*

*On November 18, 1993, through an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting, the Company authorized the initial offering of up to five percent (5%) of its paid in capital stock through the issue of Class C shares.”*

 

         

----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00049-CR

RODRICK LAWRENCE HURST,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1461897D)

July 30, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 32
                             RULE 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Central
Bank Corporation (the "Corporation") that the Annual Report of the Corporation
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation
as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
included in this report.


Dated: March 31, 2008                   By: S/ DAVID A. WIDLAK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Widlak
                                            President and CEO
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 31, 2008                   By:  S/ RAY T. COLONIUS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ray T. Colonius
                                            CFO and Treasurer
                                            (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer)
Conservation Practice Standard Overview 

October

2014

Contour buffer strips are strips of perennial 

grass alternated with wider cultivated strips 

that are farmed on the contour. Vegetation in 

strips consists of adapted species of grasses 

or a mixture of grasses and legumes. 

Practice Information 

Contour buffer strips slow runoff water, trap 

sediment, and reduce erosion. Sediments, 

nutrients, pesticides, and other potential 

pollutants are filtered out as water flows 

through the grass strips. The grass strips 

also provide food and cover for wildlife. 

The practice is more difficult to establish on 

undulating to rolling topography because of 

the difficulty of maintaining parallel strip 

boundaries across the hill slope or staying 

within row-grade limits. 

The effectiveness of contour buffer strips is 

dependent on several variables such as 

steepness, soil type, crops grown, strip 

widths, management, and climatic factors. 

Common Associated Practices 

Contour Buffer Strips (332) are commonly 

applied with practices such as Grassed 

Waterway (412), Integrated Pest 

Management (595), Residue and Tillage 

Management, No-Till (329), and Residue and 

Tillage Management, Reduced Till (345).

 

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office. 

Contour Buffer Strips (332) 

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
EXHIBIT 10.14(a)

                                      NOTE


$500.000                                              As of March 17, 1998


      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Think New Ideas. Inc., with an address
at 45 West 36th Street (the "Borrower") hereby  unconditionally  promises to pay
on such date as may be required  pursuant  to Section 2.4 of the Loan  Agreement
(as  hereinafter  defined),  to the order of Omnicom  Finance  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation (the  "Creditor")  with offices at 437 Madison Avenue,  New York, NY
10022 at said  address or at such  other  address as the Lender may from time to
time  designate,  in  lawful  money  of the  United  States  and in  immediately
available   funds,  the  principal  amount  of  FIVE  HUNDRED  THOUSAND  DOLLARS
($500,000) DOLLARS.


      The  undersigned  further  agrees to pay  interest  in like  money at such
office  on the  unpaid  principal  amount  hereof  from the date  hereof  at the
applicable  rate determined in accordance with Section 2.3 of the Loan Agreement
and on the date specified in Section 2.4 of the Loan Agreement.


      Whenever any payment to be made  hereunder  shall be stated to be due on a
Saturday,  Sunday or a public or bank  holiday  (any other day being a "Business
Day"), such payment may be made on the next succeeding Business Day.

      This  Note is the Note  referred  to in the Loan  Agreement  of even  date
herewith  between the Borrower  and Creditor (as amended from time to time,  the
"Loan  Agreement") and is entitled to the benefits thereof and is subject to the
mandatory  prepayment in whole or in part as provided  therein.  All capitalized
terms  used in this Note shall have the  meanings  ascribed  to them in the Loan
Agreement.  The  provisions  of the Loan  Agreement are  incorporated  herein by
reference.



<PAGE>



      Upon the  occurrence  and  continuance of any one or more of the Events of
Default  specified in the Loan Agreement,  all amounts then remaining  unpaid on
this Note may be declared to be, or may  automatically  become,  immediately due
and payable as provided therein.


      Presentment,  demand,  protest and notice of dishonor are hereby waived by
the Borrower.

      This Note shall be governed by and construed  according to the laws of the
State of New York.

                                                Think New Ideas, Inc.

                                                By:  /s/  Melvin Epstein
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                Title:  C.F.O.
# C_2005082EN.01000503.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/5

---

Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order brought on 28 January 2005 by Intek Company against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-1/05 SA)

(2005/C 82/11)

An application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 28 January 2005 by Intek Company, represented by R. Nathan, avocat.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor; |
| --- | --- |

—

lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 8 - Occupational Health

# Occupational Health (Division 8): Regulatory Guides 8.21 - 8.40

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 8, "Occupational Health," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 8.1 - 8.20
          - Regulatory Guides 8.21 - 8.40

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2122 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2122

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
      of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2017

  Mr. McKinley (for himself and Mr. Delaney) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
      of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY 
              REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT INVOLVING JENNINGS RANDOLPH 
              DAM.

    (a) Extension of Time.--Notwithstanding the time period specified 
in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715 (referred to in this section as the ``project''), the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as 
the ``Commission'') may, at the request of the licensee for the 
project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of, and the 
procedures of the Commission under, that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods that begin on the date of the expiration of the extension 
originally issued by the Commission.
    (b) Obligation of Licensee.--Any obligation of the licensee for the 
project for the payment of annual charges under section 10(e) of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence on the expiration 
of the time period to commence construction of the project, as extended 
by the Commission under subsection (a).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--
            (1) In general.--If the period required for the 
        commencement of construction of the project has expired before 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate 
        the license effective as of the date of the expiration of the 
        license.
            (2) Extension.--If the Commission reinstates the license 
        under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under 
        subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the expiration 
        of the license.
                                 <all>
```
From: Monteleon, Chris (FAA)

To: rdurden@iflgroup.com

Cc: Prosek, Richard (FAA)

Subject: Petition for Exemption, June 27, 2014, IFL Group

Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 4:13:37 PM

July 22, 2014

Richard Durden

General Counsel

IFL Group

Mr. Durden:

Could you please provide us the make/model/series of the aircraft to which your subject

petition pertains. We would appreciate other information pertaining to the aircraft you may

have supporting your petition, e.g., supplemental type certificate(s), etc.

Please let me know if I may be of further assistance.

Regards,

Chris Monteleon

FAA HQ / AFS-250

202-267-3723

Chris.Monteleon@faa.gov