alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products (Ac.) (333) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products (Ac.) (333) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products (Ac.) (333) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our FOTG website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products (Ac.) (333) (6/15) Standard Document(73.01 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products Conservation Practice Overview(421.64 KB)

Amending Soil Properties with Gypsum Products Network Effects Diagram(61.03 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      15,739,565
<SECURITIES>                                53,249,295
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,772,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,072,399
<INVENTORY>                                153,708,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,229,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,427,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      207,731,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       810,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     540,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,427,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,250,828
<CGS>                                        1,440,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,670,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,072,399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,807,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                   692,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,114,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
#### Estate of Wetzker: Erdmann, Executor, Appellant, vs. Kroll, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Lilian M. Kohlmets*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *George J. Graebner*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Brush Management, Critical Area Planting, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Firebreak, Forest Trails and Landings, Fuel Break, Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Riparian Forest Buffer, Sediment Basin, Silvopasture Establishment, Structure for Water Control, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2004

in Case T-96/03: Manuel Camós Grau v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Investigation of the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) concerning the management and financing of the Institute for European-Latin American Relations - Possible conflict of interests with regard to an investigator - Decision to remove the investigator from the team - Action for annulment - Preparatory measures - Inadmissible)

(2004/C 228/94)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-96/03: Manuel Camós Grau, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially H. van Lier, then J.-F. Pasquier and C. Ladenburger, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for, first, annulment of the decision of the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) of 17 May 2002 to remove one of the investigators from the investigation concerning the Institute for European-Latin American relations in order to avoid any apparent conflict of interests, without annulling the measures adopted by that investigator, and also the decision implicitly rejecting the applicant's complaint of 29 July 2002 against that decision and, second, damages by way of compensation for the non-material damage and damage to his career allegedly sustained as a consequence of those decisions — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 June 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

----
# C_2004168EN.01001202.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/12

---

Action brought on 26 April 2004 by Gerasimos Potamianos against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-160/04)

(2004/C 168/23)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 April 2004 by Gerasimos Potamianos, residing in Brimbergen (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to renew his contract as a temporary servant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to renew his contract as a temporary servant;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is challenging the appointing authority's refusal to renew his contract as a member of the temporary staff.

In that regard, it is made clear that the contested decision is based exclusively on the policy limiting the services of non-permanent staff in force in DG RTD, which has the effect of excluding from the scope of recruitment all servants with more than six years' seniority in the service of the Commission, seniority which is greater than that of other servants allowed to take part.

In the applicant's submission, that limitation is contrary to the first subparagraph of Article 12(1) of the Conditions of Employment of other servants, which states that recruitment is to be directed to securing for the institution the service of persons of the highest standard of ability, efficiency and integrity. It is also contrary to the decision of DG ADMIN to authorise the extension of contracts of temporary servants 2(b) (operating budget) or 2(d) (research budget) of short duration until 30 April 2004.

In support of his claims, the applicant further alleges breach of the principle of non-discrimination and also misuse of powers in the present case.

---
Interagency Review

1.) Submission to OMB on August 31, 2011

2.) Interagency Comments 1 – email from Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, to Jeremy Arling, 

EPA, on September 27, 2011

3.) EPA Response to Interagency Comments 1 – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to 

Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, on October 11, 2011

4.) EPA Response to Interagency Comments 2 – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to 

Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, on October 27, 2011

5.) EPA Response to Interagency Comments 3 – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to 

Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, on November 7, 2011

6.) Interagency Comments 2 – email from Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, to Luke Hall-Jordan, 

EPA, on November 7, 2011

7.) EPA Response to Interagency Comments 4 – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to 

Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, on November 17, 2011

8.) Interagency Request to see EPA memos – email from Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, to 

Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, on November 29, 2011

9.) EPA Response to Interagency Request – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to Nathan 

Frey, OMB/OIRA, on November 29, 2011

10.) EPA Response to Interagency Comments 5 – email from Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, to 

Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, on December 13, 2011

11.) OMB Concurrence – email from Nathan Frey, OMB/OIRA, to Luke Hall-Jordan, EPA, 

on December 14, 2011

12.) Final Proposed Rule Showing Changes
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42

December 18, 2001

Amgen Inc. ("Amgen")
One Amgen Center Drive
Building 29
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Attention:  Philip Tagari
Associate Director, Research

RE:  AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO TECHNOLOGY ACCESS AGREEMENT

Dear Phil:

        We have realized that the amendment we signed earlier this week does not
provide for continued confidentiality between Caliper and Amgen, beyond the
expiration of our original agreement later this month. Accordingly, this Letter
Amendment (the "Amendment Number 2") will reflect an additional amendment to the
Technology Access Agreement between Caliper and Amgen dated December 21, 1998
(the "Original Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.

        1.      CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. In the event that either party
                provides any Confidential Information to the other during
                calendar year 2002, the terms of Article 5 of the Original
                Agreement, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
                shall apply to such transfer. This provision of this Amendment
                Number 2 shall survive until December 31, 2002, notwithstanding
                expiration of the Original Agreement on December 21, 2001.

Please indicate Amgen's agreement to the foregoing terms by signing below where
indicated.

Sincerely,

CALIPER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

By: /s/ Michael Merion
    -------------------------------
    Name:  Michael Merion
    Title:  VP Sales & Marketing


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


<PAGE>

AMGEN INC.

By: /s/ Nicholas B. Lydon
    -------------------------------
    Name: Nicholas B. Lydon
    Title: Vice President, Small Molecule Drug Discovery
    Date:  1.7.02
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating
Partnership”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





(i)the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Operating Partnership.








Date:  November
      7, 2008
            /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.Frank
      C. Marchisello, Jr.
              Vice
      President, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust, Sole
      General Partner of the Registrant
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 223 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce 

from authorizing commercial finfish aquaculture operations in the Exclusive Economic Zone except in accordance with a law authorizing such 

action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of Commerce from authorizing commercial finfish aquaculture operations in the Exclusive Economic Zone except 

in accordance with a law authorizing such action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON AUTHORIZING FINFISH AQUA4 CULTURE IN THE EEZ. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither 

6 the Secretary of the Interior nor the Secretary of Com7 merce may issue any permit or in any other way authorize 

8 any person to conduct commercial finfish aquaculture opVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:41 Jan 11, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H223.IH H223

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 223 IH

1 erations in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United 

2 States (as established by Proclamation Numbered 5030, 

3 dated March 10, 1983), except in accordance with a law 

4 authorizing such action that is enacted after the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-95007, Form S-8 No. 333-40466, Form
S-8 No. 333-69722, Form S-8 No. 333-76636 and Form S-8 No. 333-91276) pertaining
to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the 2001
Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of Caliper Technologies Corp. and in the
Registration Statement (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 on Form S-3
No. 333-45942) of our report dated January 28, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Caliper Technologies Corp.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/   Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2003
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Atmospheric Relative Concentrations in Building Wakes (NUREG/CR-6331, PNNL-10521, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6331, Revision 1 (PDF – 3.96 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 1997**Date Published:**May 1997

**Prepared by:** J. V. Ramsdell, Jr., C. A. Simonen

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

**Prepared for:** Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

 NRC Job Code J2028

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the ARCON96 computer code developed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation for potential use in control room habitability assessments. It includes a user's guide to the code, a description of the technical basis for the code, and a programmer's guide to the code. The ARCON96 code uses hourly meteorological data and recently developed methods for estimating dispersion in the vicinity of buildings to calculate relative concentrations at control room air intakes that would be exceeded no more than five percent of the time. These concentrations are calculated for averaging periods ranging from one hour to 30 days in duration.

ARCON96 is a revised version of ARCON95, which was developed for the NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. Changes in the code permit users to simulate releases from area sources as well as point sources. The method of averaging concentrations for periods longer than 2 hours has also been changed. The change in averaging procedures increases relative concentrations for these averaging periods. In general, the increase in concentrations is less than a factor of two. The increase is greatest for relatively short averaging periods, for example 0 to 8 hours and diminishes as the duration of the averaging period increases.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Benson, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Company and others, Respondents. Kwasigroch, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Company and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Carroll & Thekan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgments affirmed.
#### Zupan (John, Jr.), by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. M. M. Schranz Roofing & Building Supply Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Brennan, Lucas & McDonough*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Wallace Reiss*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
ii"llli"'i.~ftl"f 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111726 

PP RUXQBAA 

DE RUXQAA 702 3491744 

ZNY XXXXX SSS 

P 151743Z 

BT 

xxxxx 

CATOR 004 

....,,.._ ... _ .. 

IIAHDLE vrn BYEf~ 

CotJJROL SYSTEM 

S (SR E r151743Z DEC 69 CITE WHIG 9736. 

PR lfEH I Y CHMU::F · 

FOR I FR OM CQ ONEL YOST 

SUBJECT: G/AED STRIKE INPUT 

AS I AM SURE YOU ARE AWARE, THE PROSPECTS ARE NOT 

GOOD FOR AN EARLY SETTLEMENT OF THE STRIKE AGAINST 

GENERAL ELECTRIC. 

THERE MAY BE, H01~

1

EVER, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO 

OBTAIN CORPORA TE A ND UN I ON COOPERATION SPECIFICALLY 

TAILORED TO OUR EFFORTS AT UTICA. PRIOR TO INtTIATING 

ANY REQUEST OF LABOR OR "AANAGEMENT, 'NE NEED SPEC IF IC 

OETA ILS OF THE IMPACT. FURTHER, WE NEED GE'S ANO YOUR 

ASSESSMENT OF Tl-£ SKILLS AND NUMBERS OF UNION PEOPLE, 

NOT NOW WORKING, REQUIRED TO 00 OUR JOB. WE '!i!LL THEN 

ATTEMPT TO NEGOTIATE A UNION ANO MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENT JiiHEREBY A GIVEN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WITH APPROPRIATE 

PAGE 2 WHIG 9736 ~ t C R E T 

SKILLS ARE PERVITTED TO ~i;QRK ON OUR EFFORTS. 

IN 1NORKING WITH GE TO MAKE SUCH AN ASSESSMENT, ~\!E 

MUST ENSURE THAT THE LEVEL OF EFFORT REQUESTED IS 

co~~MENSURATE WITH OUR REQUIREMENTS ONLY. ANY EFFORT 

ON THE CONTRACTOR'S PART TO PAD HIS REQUEST TO WORK ON 

OTHER EFFORTS 'NOULD JEOPARDIZE OUR ATTEMPTS AT 

1'£GOTIATING AN AGREEMENT ;HITH THE UNION. 

WE ARE VdT HHOLO I NG ANY FURTHER EFFORTS PEND I NG 

YOUR RESPONSE. 

SECRET 

BT 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111726 

1··· ·-- j-· 

----r 

SS--:"·\ : -- -¥---•-•1W••• 

CC- .. -

t fl LE 

_J
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Contract review on Fetal Body 
Composition and Volumes Study.
    Date: March 2, 2015.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65160e040b010416042508040c094b0b0c0d4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="225149434c46435143624f434b4e0c4c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02601 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>