alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005094EN.01000101.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 April 2005

(2005/C 94/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2967 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,6 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4536 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6832 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,177 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5476 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 81,78 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,22 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5825 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,19 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1916 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 138 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,61 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,595 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7934 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,69 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6193 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1129 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8119 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,147 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1469 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7321 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,382 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 422,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9274 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,897 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,06 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,317 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2967

JPY

Japanese yen

139,6

DKK

Danish krone

7,4536

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6832

SEK

Swedish krona

9,177

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5476

ISK

Iceland króna

81,78

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,22

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5825

CZK

Czech koruna

30,19

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1916

ROL

Romanian leu

36 138

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,61

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,595

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7934

AUD

Australian dollar

1,69

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6193

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1129

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8119

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,147

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,24

ZAR

South African rand

8,1469

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7321

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,382

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 422,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9274

PHP

Philippine peso

70,897

RUB

Russian rouble

36,06

THB

Thai baht

51,317

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) (7/2021) Standard Document(213.88 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) Overview(189.66 KB)

Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) CPPE(26.01 KB)

Sprinkler System (Ac.) (442) Network Effects Diagram(91.14 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Sprinkler Systems

This video explores how Daniel Keudell in Aumsville, OR, is using this practice to apply water to his crops, reducing runoff and the amount of water he uses.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2005057EN.01002502.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/25

---

Action brought on 18 November 2004 by Ms D. Beyatli and Mr A. Candan against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-455/04)

(2005/C 57/43)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 November 2004 by Ms D. Beyatli, Nicosia, Cyprus and Mr A. Candan, Istanbul, Turkey, represented by Mr A. Demetriades, lawyer.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission's Decision of 5 May 2004 declaring the applicants not successful in the written tests of the Open Competition for assistant administrators for Cypriot citizens EPSO/A/1/03; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's Decision of 5 May 2004 declaring the applicants not successful in the written tests of the Open Competition for assistant administrators for Cypriot citizens EPSO/A/1/03;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants are Cypriot nationals whose mother tongue is Turkish. They applied for a position of assistant administrator in the context of Open Competition EPSO/A/1/03 for Cypriot citizens. The notice of competition required that candidates have a thorough knowledge of the Greek language. The applicants failed to receive a sufficient number of points in test (e), which was in the Greek language, and were thus not admitted to the oral tests.

The applicants challenge this decision, submitting that the requirement that candidates should have a thorough knowledge of Greek is discriminatory, given that not all Cypriot citizens have Greek as their mother tongue. According to the applicants this requirement violates Article 12 EC and Articles 1d and 27 of the Staff Regulations. They further allege that Article 3 of Regulation 401/2004 (1) limits recruitment only to those having one of the existing 11 official languages as their main language and is thus not proportionate with the objectives of the European Union and its intention to integrate Turkish speaking Cypriots within the European Union.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 401/2004 of 23 February 2004 introducing, on the occasion of the accession of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia, special temporary measures for recruitment of officials of the European Communities, OJ L 67, 05/03/2004, p.1

1

---
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                          NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                NINE MONTHS         NINE MONTHS         THREE MONTHS         THREE MONTHS
                                               ENDED 9/30/01       ENDED 9/30/00        ENDED 9/30/01       ENDED 9/30/00
                                               -------------       -------------        -------------       -------------
<S>                                          <C>                  <C>                 <C>                 <C>

NET INCOME (LOSS)                           $      (1,640,000)   $         384,000   $         267,000    $        (315,000)
                                            ==================   =================   =================    ==================

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC
---------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
   during the period                                5,470,311            5,468,644           5,470,311            5,468,644
                                            =================    =================   =================    ==================

Earnings (Loss) per common share -
   Basic                                    $           (.30)    $             .07   $             .05    $           (.06)
                                            =================    =================   =================    ==================

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
-----------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
   during the period                                5,470,311            5,468,644           5,470,311            5,468,644

Common and Common Stock equivalent
   shares using the treasury stock method                   0              188,332                   0              186,190
                                            -----------------    -----------------   -----------------    -----------------

Total shares outstanding for purposes of
   calculating diluted earnings                     5,470,311            5,656,976           5,470,311            5,654,834
                                            =================    =================   =================    ==================

Earnings (loss) per common and
   common Equivalent share - Diluted        $            (.30)                 .07   $             .05    $            (.06)
                                            =================    =================   =================    ==================

</TABLE>





                                       16
HomeNuclear SecurityDomestic SafeguardsPhysical ProtectionRegulatory Initiatives

# Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations

Among its regulatory initiatives related to Domestic Safeguards, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is in the process of proposing a rulemaking that would revise the agency's security requirements for the storage of spent nuclear fuel at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) and the storage of spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste or both at a monitored retrievable storage installation (MRS). This proposed rulemaking would also make conforming changes to the licensing requirements for security plans and programs at ISFSIs and MRSs. For additional information about this rulemaking and related opportunities for public involvement, please see Proposed Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, August 14, 2017

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Contact Us About Regulatory Initiatives for Domestic Safeguards
          - Cyber-Security Rulemaking for Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, August 14, 2017
**Exhibit 21.1****Subsidiaries of Imation Corp.**               **Country or State in**        **Which Subsidiary**        **was Organized** **Percentage of Ownership**    Imation Enterprises Corp. Delaware  100     Imation Mercosur Trading S.A. Uruguay  100     Imation Funding Corp. Delaware  100     Imation Data Storage LLC Delaware  100     Imation Data Storage Holdings CV Netherlands  100     Imation Latin America Corp. Delaware  100     Imation Latin America Marketing S.A. Panama  100     Imation do Brasil Ltda. Brazil  100     Imation Chile S.A. Chile  100     Imation Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico  100     Imation Argentina S.A.C.I.F.I.A. Argentina  100     Imation Colombia S.A. Colombia  100     Imation Venezuela S.A. Venezuela  100     Imation Canada Inc. Canada  100     Imation (Thailand) Ltd. Thailand  100     Imation Holdings Pte Ltd. Singapore  100     Imation Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Singapore  100     Imation ANZ Pty Ltd. Australia  100     Imation (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. China  100     Imation (Guangzhou) International Co. Ltd. China  100     Imation (Tianjin) International Co. Ltd. China  100     Imation Information Technology (Beijing) Ltd. China  100     Imation Hong Kong Ltd. Hong Kong  100     Imation Recording Media (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. Hong Kong  100     Imation India Private Ltd. India  100     Imation Corporation Japan Japan  60   * Imation Corporation Japan TMK Japan  100     Imation Korea, Inc. Korea  100     Imation (Malaysia) SDN.BHD. Malaysia  100     Imation Singapore Pte. Ltd. Singapore  100     Imation Taiwan Ltd. Taiwan  100     Memorex Products (Taiwan) Inc. Taiwan  100     Imation Europe B.V. Netherlands  100     Imation France S.A. France  100     Imation Deutschland GmbH Germany  100     Imation S.p.A. Italy  100     Imation Iberia, S.A. Spain  100     Imation Middle East FZE United Arab Emirates  100     Imation U.K. Limited United Kingdom  100     TDK Marketing Europe GmbH Germany  100     TDK Polska SP Zoo Poland  100     Imation Ireland Ltd. Ireland  100     Global Data Media FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates  51   * Glyphics Media Inc. New York  51   * MBI International FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates  51   * MBI International Services Private Ltd. India  51   * MBII India Marketing Private Ltd. India  51   * Memorex Products Inc. California  100     Memorex Products Europe Ltd. United Kingdom  100     Memorex Products GmbH Germany  100     Memorex Products SAS France  100     Hanny Magnetics Europe Limited United Kingdom  100     Imation Online Service Corp. New York  100      * Imation Corporation Japan and Global Data Media FZ-LLC and its subsidiaries are joint ventures.
# C_2005006EN.01002502.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Belgian Cour de Cassation (1st Chamber) by decision of that court of 7 October 2004 in the case of the Belgian State against Recolta Recycling s.p.r.l.

st

(Case C-440/04)

(2005/C 6/48)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Belgian Cour de Cassation (Court of Cassation) (1st Chamber) of 7 October 2004, received at the Court Registry on 19 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of the Belgian State against Recolta Recycling s.p.r.l. on the following questions:

st

| 1. | Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax?

| 2. | Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself?

---
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Virginia - Fiscal Year 2024
#### Quinn, Respondent, vs. City Fruit Market, Inc., Appellant.

For the appellant: *Éender, Trump & McIntyre,*attorneys, and *David G. Owen, Jr.,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *H. K. Curtis*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
H. R. 219 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to provide 

for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the corrected survey 

boundary to the State of Alaska. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project 

Boundary Correction Act’’. 

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE SWAN LAKE 

HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT BOUNDARY. 

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall— 

(1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract of Federal 

land within the project boundary of the Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2911) as generally depicted and 

labeled ‘‘Lost Creek’’ on the map entitled ‘‘Swan Lake Project 

Boundary—Lot 2’’ and dated February 1, 2016; and 

(2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the tract 

described in paragraph (1) in accordance with— 

(A) the survey authorized under paragraph (1); 

(B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 (commonly 

known as the ‘‘Alaska Statehood Act’’) (48 U.S.C. note 

prec. 21; Public Law 85–508); and 

(C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

818). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Water Harvesting Catchment (Code 636) 

Water harvesting catchment is a facility for collecting and

storing runoff from precipitation. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of a water harvesting catchment is to provide

water for livestock, fish, wildlife, and/or other uses

bytreatingcontributing areas or the construction of elevated

roof structures to increase, collect, and store runoff water

for future use. 

This practice involvestreatinga watershed or portion of a watershed to increase, collect, and store

runoff water. It may also involve installing curbs and/or diversions to direct the runoff water to a

storage facility. The contributing area may be rock outcrops, paved areas, or other impervious areas

that yield high rates of runoff. The contributing areamay requiretreatmentwith material such as asphalt,

wax, rubber, plastic, concrete, metal, or other impervious material. 

Consideration of the effects the practice has on the quantity and quality of surface and ground water

resources should be made. Factors may include changes in evaporation, timing of releases from the

catchment, and the impact of the type of catchment on surface water versus ground water resources. 

A water harvesting catchment will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Water Harvesting Catchment (Code 636) is commonly

applied with NRCS CPSs such as Diversion (Code 362), Livestock Pipeline (Code 516), Pumping

Plant (Code 533), Pond (Code 378), Watering Facility (Code 614), Aquaculture Ponds (Code 397),

and Critical Area Planting (Code 342). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2005142EN.01005002.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/50

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3788 — Nordic Capital/Outokumpu Copper Products)

(2005/C 142/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 May 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3788. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3788. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---