alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anonymous.

The words of a will, directing all just debts to be paid, will prevent the bar of the statute of limitations.

One of the questions in this case was, whether the Plaintiff was barred by the act of limitations. The note *280oí’hand was given in the year 1783, in the month October or .November. An action was brought seven or eight years after, but in the mean time Defendant di<‘d, not long' before the commencement of this suit, and by his will in one. part thereof said, after payment of all my just debts, then 1 give, &c. *Fer*curiam—The act of limitations was made to prevent the inconvenience of stale demands, and to hinder them after a reasonable length of time front rising up to charge him. This law though very .generally reprobated, is founded upon prin-cipies of justice, and ought to be adhered to $ and bad the act never received an interpretation which might govern the present case, the court would now be of opinion, that the using of such words in a ¡nan’s will, ought not t« prevent the operation of that act, for that they are words common in almost ail wills : but these words by former decisions, have been held to have that effect, for the executor without such words is bound to pay all recoverable debts ; bur these words are supposed to bind him to something further — the. payment of all just debts, 3 *P. Wil.*373, *Sulk.*154. 2 *Vern*141. whether recoverable at law or not, and are deemed to mean more than the law lays upon the executor without any such words used. The Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. *Baker*for Plaintiff, and *Davie*for Defendant.

*Note.*— Quere, whether this cage is not overruled by the case of *Walker's Ex’rs.*v. *Campbell & others,*1 Hawks 304, in which it vas" held, that a debt barred hv the statute oi limitations is not revived -..y a direction in the debtor. will, that certa.n slaves be sold “and t with the proceeds there of, *paying my debts,*they,” *&c.*See also *Barke v. Jones,*2 *Ves & Beam. 275.*
#### Schlabach, Respondent, vs. Knutson and another, Appellants: Wolf and another, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.

For the appellants : *Hale & Skemp*of La Crosse.

For the plaintiff-respondent: *Otto M. Schlabach*of La Crosse.

For the impleaded defendants and respondents: *Schubert & Stevenson*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
. 

. ~ ALBEMARLE® J) 1C O R P O R A T I O N 

725 Cannon Bridge Road Telephone : 803-534-5781 

P.O. Box 1028 Facsimile: 803-536-0981 

Orangeburg, SC 29116-1028 

April 16, 2007 

Ms. Catherine Roman 

Project Manager 

Chemical Information and Testing Branch 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 7407M 

EPA East, Room 6428 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Ms. Roman: 

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTlON 

This letter is to document my conversation with you regarding the use of acetyl chloride 

(CAS No. 75-36-5) at Albemarle Corporation's Orangeburg site . Please accept this letter as f'-.' 

confirmation that acetyl chloride manufactured and/or imported to the Orangeburg site is onN; 

used to make pharmaceuticals. To the extent this changes we understand it may have 

implications for our TSCA inventory list. 

If you have any questions, please call me at (803) 539-5283 . 

Sincerely 

M. G. Clisby 

MGC:dw - 

MAIL 7006 0100 l 

N Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete 

CERTIFIED item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. 

cc : Kim Boudeaux - Albemar " Print your name and address on the reverse 

so that we can return the card to you. 

m Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 

or on the front if space permits. 

1. Article Addressed to : 

CONTAINS NO CBI 

Ms. Catherine Roman 

TSCA CBiC 

USEPA 

EPA East, Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. . 

Washington, DC. 

Acetyl Chloride to EPA 

MV. 7407M 

2. Article Number 

(Transfer from service label) 

p 

- 

i 

R 1A 

COMPLETE THIS SECTIOti' ON DELIVERY 

A. si9rlature 

X f 7., : ,.,.. 

0 Agent 

0 Addressee 

C. Dale qf.,DAlivery 

D. Is delivery address different from item 1? O Yes 

it YES, enter delivery address below: O No 

3. Service TYPO 

gcerttiled mail O Express Mail 

Registered [3 Return Receipt for Merchandise 

I] insured mail O C.O.D. 

4. Restricted Delivery? (Exba Fee) O Yes 

7006 0100 0005 3008 5654 

PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
# C_2004222EN.01000402.xml

| 4.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3510 — SHELL/SAUDI ARAMCO/SHOWA SHELL)

(2004/C 222/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3510. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3510. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
# C_2005093EN.01000802.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan by decision of that court of 1 February 2005 in Kaj Lyyski v Umeå universitet

(Case C-40/05)

(2005/C 93/15)

Language of the case: Swedish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Överklagandenämnden för högskolan (Sweden) of 1 February 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Kaj Lyyski and Umeå universitet on the following question:

| 1. | Does Community law, in particular Article 12 EC, prevent the imposition, on assessment of an applicant's eligibility for admission to teacher training intended in the short term to meet the need for qualified teachers in Sweden, of a requirement of employment in a Swedish school? Can such a requirement be considered justified and proportional? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Community law, in particular Article 12 EC, prevent the imposition, on assessment of an applicant's eligibility for admission to teacher training intended in the short term to meet the need for qualified teachers in Sweden, of a requirement of employment in a Swedish school? Can such a requirement be considered justified and proportional?

| 2. | Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if an applicant for the training course who is employed in a school in a Member State other than Sweden is a Swedish national or a national of another Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if an applicant for the training course who is employed in a school in a Member State other than Sweden is a Swedish national or a national of another Member State?

| 3. | Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if the teacher training is intended to be of limited duration or if the teacher involved is of a longer duration? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question if the teacher training is intended to be of limited duration or if the teacher involved is of a longer duration?

---
# C_2005003EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 January 2005

(2005/C 3/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3224 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4396 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70485 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0373 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5528 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2835 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5806 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,429 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,17 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4332 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1204 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 666 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,625 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8329 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7354 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6269 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,301 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8963 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1823 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 383,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8085 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3224

JPY

Japanese yen

138,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4396

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70485

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0373

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5528

ISK

Iceland króna

83,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2835

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5806

CZK

Czech koruna

30,429

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,17

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4332

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1204

ROL

Romanian leu

38 666

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,625

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8329

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7354

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6269

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,301

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8963

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1823

KRW

South Korean won

1 383,76

ZAR

South African rand

7,8085

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Direct Service Oil Company, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Affeldt & Lichtsinn*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Thomas E. Torphy*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 15, 2016 

# Order

Clerk April 15, 2016

151524 (40)

SBC HEALTH MIDWEST, INC.,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

SC: 151524

v COA: 319428

Tax Tribunal: 00

- 416230

CITY OF KENTWOOD,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Building Owners and Managers

Association of Metropolitan Detroit and the Apartment Association of Michigan to

participate as am icus curiae and file an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief

submitted on April 13, 2016, is accepted for filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has initiated a strategic planning process that will culminate in the ODS Strategic Plan for 2015-2020. To assist with this process, the ODS requests input from research communities—academic, government, and industry—and from other interested parties.

# DATES:

In order to ensure full consideration, all responses must be submitted by midnight, March 6, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Interested individuals and organizations should submit their responses to                         *ODSplan@od.nih.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anne L. Thurn, Ph.D., Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 3B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7517, Phone: 301-435-2920, Fax: 301-480-1845, Email:                         *ODSplan@od.nih.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The overall purpose of the strategic planning effort is to identify both new opportunities and emerging needs for incorporation in the programmatic efforts of the Office. A background paper, ODS Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Progress Report, summarizes progress in five key areas of ODS activities. The background paper and related information are available on the ODS Web site at                     *http://ods.od.nih.gov/​strategicplan.*

Guidance is being requested from all interested parties on these important issues.
    - Are the current strategic goals adequate?
    - Is ODS meeting its stakeholders' needs?
    - In the future, should some of ODS's current programs or activities be given higher (or lower) priority?
    - How can ODS more effectively provide useful information to the ODS user community, including consumers, investigators, practitioners, industry, media, policy makers, government, and other interested parties?

Dated: January 30, 2015.

Lawrence A. Tabak,

Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2015-02370 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108052 

~JONAL 

TOPSfCflff--__ 

RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

THE NRO STAFF ~ 

~ v~ _ ~ 4 ~~"f· /,Ml'ul 

April 10, 1968 

/ ua.u""" ~_.d ~,A; 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROLS VSTEM 

MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL BE 

SUBJECT: Reports and Briefings 

This responds to your memorandum of April 4, same subject. 

The case in point -- Dr. Land's query regarding how GAMBIT 

is doing - - is not unexpected by either of us, I am sure. Dr. Land 

asked about GAMBIT on August 29, at a rather stormy PSAC meeting, 

which you attended. At that time, Dr. Flax sent you a note saying, 

"I want to take the offensive on this -- prepare paper giving balanced 

assessment of G-3 program to be sent to PSAC panel. 11 On February 14, 

in anticipation of a PSAC meeting, you forwarded a thirteen-page GAMBIT 

report to Dr. Flax (I have withdrawn the report, briefly, from Dr. Flax's 

vault and it is attached to this memo}. 

It would be a mistake to generalize from this incident that the NRO 

fails to keep the Land panel well informed. I would also advise against 

a periodic 11 all-up 11 FIAB-type report to the panel, mainly because too 

many people would get the report, read it, and abuse our hospitality. 

I would suggest that if we are pressed in this matter we recommend 

that the panel be given a product analysis once -- or at the most twice --

per year, by a where-we-stand expert like John Hughes. The use of. a 

third party would give us maximum credibility with the panel and would 

be a labor of love for John Hughes. 

PAULE. WORTHMAN 

Colonel, USAF 

~ CONTROL NO 

COPY 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING PAGE 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108052 

OF 

OF 

COP! ES 

PAC.ES 
I l NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 

THE NRO STAFF April 4, 1968 

GAMBIT 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL WORTHMAN 

SUBJECT: Reports & Briefings 

1. Dr. Flax was bothered by Dr. Land's question to him 

at the last PSAC session "How is GAMBIT doing? and what 

kind of optical quality are you experiencing?" It is very 

apparent that this group is not being kept up-to-date with 

either a written report or an oral Dog & Pony. 

2. Dr. Flax simply assumed this to be the case and was 

surprised that it was not. His questions: How many cases 

like this are there? and shouldn't we sort this out like 

we do for FIAB for instance? 

3. May I have your comments please, Paul{ 

Russe Berg 

Brigadier General, USAF 

Director 

HANOI EVIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

GAMBIT 

HANDLE VIA CONTROL NO _____ _ 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108052 

COPY ___ OF ___ COPI ES 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES
46 F. (2d) *571*

#### In Re Fred D. Wilson

(No. 2580)

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,

February 3, 1931

*Wallace R. Lane (F. F. Mason*and *Wm. 8. Hodges*of counsel) for appellant.

*T. A. Hostetler {Howard 8. Miller*of counsel) for the Commissioner of .Patents.

[Oral argument January 6, 1931, by Mr. Hodges and Mr. Miller]

Before Graham, Presiding Judge, and Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, and Lenroot, Associate Judges

Bland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The subject matter of this *ex parte*appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the ■decision of the examiner, is for improved vehicle wheels, claimed to .he operable in both vertical and inclined positions, as on a road grader.

In the use of a road grader it is often necessary for one wheel to run in the ditch at the side of the road while the other is on more level ground and nearer the center of the road. In order that the wheels may not slip and that the vehicle may have traction, applicant’s device is so constructed that projecting flanges on each side of the tire of the wheel come in contact with the road when the wheels stand at an angle. The rim, bolts, nuts, and tire are so arranged as to provide a means which the applicant claims will prevent skidding.

The claims were rejected upon the following references:

> Reid, 623034, April 11, 1899.

> Neill et al., 683220, September 24, 1901.

> Bosworth, 1043061, November 5, 1912.

> Gray, 1240337, September 18, 1917.

> Dawson, 1487920, March 15, 1924.

> Hutchinson (Fr. Add.) 8014, of 1907.

> Cann (French), 389296, of 1908.

We have carefully examined the references and the opinions of the tribunals below and have considered the argument of counsel on both sides, and agree with the Board of Appeals that applicant has disclosed nothing patentable over the prior art cited, and the decision of the Board of Appeals is *affirmed.*
# C_2005136EN.01003101.xml

| 3.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/31

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2005

(2005/C 136/12)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2263 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67535 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1528 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5348 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,77 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,906 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5751 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,355 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1198 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 164 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,896 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6549 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6305 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,53 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5444 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7528 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0515 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 241,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,4172 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1495 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,321 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 741,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6599 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,901 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,772 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,894 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2263

JPY

Japanese yen

132,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67535

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1528

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5348

ISK

Iceland króna

79,77

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,906

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5751

CZK

Czech koruna

30,355

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1198

ROL

Romanian leu

36 164

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,896

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6549

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6305

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,53

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5444

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7528

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0515

KRW

South Korean won

1 241,81

ZAR

South African rand

8,4172

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1495

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,321

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 741,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6599

PHP

Philippine peso

66,901

RUB

Russian rouble

34,772

THB

Thai baht

49,894

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---