SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

Commission file number: 0-21039

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND


52-1975978(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)


(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)


1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 2500, Arlington, VA 22209
(Address of principal executive offices)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER INCLUDING AREA CODE: (703) 247-2500

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE


THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC(Title of class)


(Name of each exchange on
which registered)


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:[X]Yes[ ]No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act:[ ]Yes[X]No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.[X]Yes[ ]No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

[X]Large accelerated filer[ ]Accelerated filer[ ]Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).[ ]Yes[X]No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold) as of June 29, 2007, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $1.9 billion.

The total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2008 was 14,426,634.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (which is expected to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s 2007 fiscal year) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

FORM 10-K

INDEX

PagePART IItem 1


Business




2Item 1A


Risk Factors




23Item 1B


Unresolved Staff Comments




28Item 2


Properties




28Item 3


Legal Proceedings




28Item 4


Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders




28PART IIItem 5


Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities




29Item 6


Selected Financial Data




32Item 7


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




34Item 7A


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk




41Item 8


Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




42Item 9


Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure




62Item 9A


Controls and Procedures




62Item 9B


Other Information




63PART IIIItem 10


Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant




64Item 11


Executive Compensation




68Item 12


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management




69Item 13


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions




69Item 14


Principal Accounting Fees and Services




69PART IVItem 15


Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules




70SIGNATURES




71CERTIFICATIONS


---



PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:

This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein include ‘‘forward-looking statements,’’ within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), including, in particular, the statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the headings ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and ‘‘Business.’’ We have typically used the words ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘intend’’ and similar expressions in this document and the documents incorporated by reference herein to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to many risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other things:

| |   |                                          
| | - | -----------------------------------------
| | • | the pace of growth of student enrollment;

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our continued compliance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act and the regulations thereunder, as well as state regulatory requirements and accrediting agency requirements;

| |   |                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------
| | • | risks related to the timing of regulatory approvals;

| |   |                     
| | - | --------------------
| | • | competitive factors;

| |   |                                                                 
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our ability to continue to implement our online growth strategy;

| |   |                                                   
| | - | --------------------------------------------------
| | • | risks associated with the opening of new campuses;

| |   |                                                                                                      
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | risks associated with the offering of new educational programs and adapting to other program changes;

| |   |                                                                                
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | risks associated with the acquisition of existing educational institutions; and

| |   |                                        
| | - | ---------------------------------------
| | • | general economic and market conditions.

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. You should understand that many important factors, including those discussed under the headings ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and ‘‘Business,’’ could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or suggested in any forward-looking statements. Further information about these and other relevant risks and uncertainties may be found in Item 1A (‘‘Risk Factors’’) below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements.

1

---



Item 1.    Business

Overview

Our company is a for-profit post-secondary education services corporation. Our mission is to make high quality, post-secondary education achievable and convenient for working adults in today’s economy. We work to fulfill this mission by offering a variety of academic programs through our wholly-owned subsidiary Strayer University, Inc., both in traditional classroom courses and online via the Internet. Strayer University prides itself on making post-secondary education accessible to working adults who were previously unable to take advantage of higher education opportunities.

Founded in 1892, Strayer University is an institution of higher learning that offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs in business administration, accounting, information technology, education, and public administration at 55 physical campuses in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. As of December 31, 2007, we had more than 36,000 students enrolled in our programs. Strayer University is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (‘‘Middle States’’), one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education. As part of its program offering, the University also offers classes online via the Internet, providing its working adult students a flexible and convenient alternative. Strayer University, with its online offerings, attracts students from around the country and throughout the world.

Over the last several years, we have experienced significant organic growth, expanding geographically by opening new campuses. Since our initial public offering in 1996, we have grown from eight campuses in one state and Washington, D.C., to 55 campuses in 12 states and Washington, D.C. Our mission is to serve working adults’ demand for post-secondary education. We accomplish this by opening new campuses in the promising areas in those states in which we currently operate physical campuses, as well as by expanding into contiguous states that exhibit strong demand for adult education in business and information technology programs. We have opened 41 of our campuses since the beginning of 2001 and currently plan to open nine campuses in 2008, including four already opened. We have also developed a robust online education program. Since receiving regulatory approval to offer our degree programs online in 1997, our online programs have experienced rapid growth, with over 25,000 students enrolled in at least one class online during the 2007 fall term.

In May 2001, we hired a new senior management team, made significant investments in information technology infrastructure to support planned growth in our online programs, and embarked on a long term program to open new campuses in areas where there is a strong demand for adult education. As a result of these efforts, between 2000 and 2007 our revenues grew 22% on a compound annual basis, as our revenues increased from $78 million in 2000 to $318 million in 2007. During the same period, diluted earnings per share grew at a compound annual rate of 18% including the impact of stock-based compensation which we began recording in 2006, as we continued to invest heavily in our various initiatives to serve working adult students. For more information relating to our revenues, profits and total assets, please refer to ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Industry Background and Outlook

The market for post-secondary education is large, growing and highly fragmented. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has reported that approximately 61 million working adults in the United States do not have more than a high school education and approximately 32 million people have some college experience but no degree. We believe that the demand for post-secondary education will

2

---



continue to increase during the next several years as a result of demographic, economic and social trends, including:

| |   |                                                                         
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | an increase in demand by employers for professional and skilled workers;

| |   |                                                                                                                      
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | a projected 18% growth in the annual number of high school graduates from 2.8 million in 2000 to 3.3 million in 2010;

| |   |                                                                                            
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | the significant and measurable income premium attributable to post-secondary education; and

| |   |                                                                
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | budgetary constraints at traditional colleges and universities.

The adult education market is a significant and growing component of the post-secondary education market. We believe that the market for post-secondary adult education should continue to increase as working adults seek additional education to update and improve their skills. In addition, we believe that many working adults will seek regionally accredited degree programs that provide flexibility to accommodate the fixed schedules and time commitments associated with their professional, family and personal obligations.

In addition to Strayer, there are currently several hundred not-for-profit universities, several public companies and numerous smaller private companies operating in the post-secondary education market in which we operate.

Company Strengths

We have a 116-year operating history and a track record of providing practical and convenient education programs for working adults. We believe the following strengths position us to capitalize on the growing demand for post-secondary education among working adults:

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Consistent operating history.We have been in continuous operation since 1892 and have demonstrated an ability to operate consistently and grow profitably. Our enrollment and revenue have grown each year since our initial public offering in 1996.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Practical and diversified curricula.We offer core curricula in stable, high-demand areas of adult education. In order to keep pace with a changing knowledge-based economy, we constantly strive to meet the evolving needs of our working adult students and their employers by regularly refining and updating our existing educational programs. Additionally, we replicate programs that are successful in a given campus at additional locations throughout our network of campuses. Strayer University currently offers 84 different degree, diploma and certificate programs, including emphases and concentrations, to its students.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Focus on working adults pursuing degree programs.We focus on serving working adults, who are pursuing college degrees in order to advance their career and employment opportunities. We believe this is an attractive market within the post-secondary education sector due to the growing number of adult students enrolling in post-secondary education programs and the highly motivated nature of adult students. We consider adult students to be our primary customers, with the various business and government organizations that provide tuition assistance to their employees as our secondary customers. In addition, we believe that the structure of our curriculum, featuring associate, bachelor’s and graduate-level degree programs, encourages students to continue their education and results in extended periods of student enrollment which positively impacts the visibility and predictability of our future revenues. Approximately 94% of our students were enrolled in degree programs for the 2007 fall term.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Flexible program offerings.We maintain flexible quarterly programs that allow working adult students to attend classes and complete coursework on a convenient evening and weekend schedule throughout the calendar year. Additionally, we developed online programs to enable students to pursue a degree partially or entirely via the Internet, thereby increasing the convenience, accessibility and flexibility of our educational programs. Approximately 70% of our students enrolled for the 2007 fall term were taking at least one course online. We believe that these flexible offerings distinguish us from many traditional universities that currently do not effectively address the special requirements of working adults.

3

---



| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Attractive and convenient campus locations.Our campuses are located in growing metropolitan areas in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern regions where there are large populations of working adults with demographic characteristics similar to those of our typical students. Strayer University’s campuses are attractive and modern, offering conducive learning environments in convenient locations.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Established brand name and alumni support.With a 116-year operating history, Strayer University is an established brand name in post-secondary adult education, and our students and graduates work throughout corporate America. Our alumni network fosters additional recruitment opportunities for students.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Strong owner-oriented management team.In connection with our recapitalization in 2001, we developed a new growth strategy and hired a new senior management team to implement this strategy. As described below, under the leadership of Robert S. Silberman, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, we embarked on various initiatives to serve the working adult market by expanding our campuses and developing an online learning platform. In addition, all of our senior officers have made investments in Strayer through outright share purchases, in addition to any compensatory stock awards.

Company Strategy

Our goal is to be a leading, nationwide provider of high quality post-secondary education programs for working adults primarily in the areas of business administration, accounting and information technology. We have identified the following factors as key to executing our growth strategy:

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Maintain stable enrollment in our mature markets.We have 30 mature campuses (those in operation for more than three years) out of a total number of 55 campuses (including two new campuses opened for the 2008 winter term in Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina, and two new campuses opened for the 2008 spring term in Atlanta, Georgia and Orlando, Florida). Our goal is to maintain stable campus enrollments in our mature markets, while increasing revenues by continuing market-based tuition increases.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Open new campuses.Our goal is to open new campuses every year by meeting unmet demand in states in which we currently operate physical campuses, and by expanding into contiguous states that exhibit strong demand for adult education in business and information technology programs. Since our initial public offering in 1996, we have grown from eight campuses to 55 campuses while expanding into 12 states and Washington, D.C. The Company has opened 41 new campuses since the beginning of 2001. These campuses are set forth in the table below:

New Campuses Opened
(since the beginning of 2001)

2001


Baltimore, Maryland (Owings Mills Campus)Norfolk, Virginia (Chesapeake Campus)Norfolk, Virginia (Newport News Campus)2002


Charlotte, North Carolina (North Charlotte Campus)Charlotte, North Carolina (South Charlotte Campus)Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina (Research Triangle Park Campus)


4

---



2003


Memphis, Tennessee (Thousand Oaks Campus)Nashville, TennesseeRaleigh-Durham, North Carolina (North Raleigh Campus)Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Lower Bucks Campus)Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Delaware County Campus)2004


Greenville, South CarolinaMemphis, Tennessee (Shelby Oaks Campus)Atlanta, Georgia (Cobb County Campus)Atlanta, Georgia (Chamblee Campus)Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (King of Prussia Campus)2005


Tampa, Florida (Tampa East Campus)Tampa, Florida (Tampa West Campus)Greensboro, North CarolinaColumbia, South CarolinaAtlanta, Georgia (Morrow Campus)2006


Wilmington, DelawarePhiladelphia, Pennsylvania (Center City Campus)Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Penn Center West Campus)Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Cranberry Woods Campus)Norfolk, Virginia (Virginia Beach Campus)Atlanta, Georgia (Roswell Campus)Charleston, South CarolinaBirmingham, Alabama2007


Louisville, KentuckyLexington, KentuckyOrlando, Florida (Maitland Campus)Orlando, Florida (Orlando East Campus)Atlanta, Georgia (Douglasville Campus)Cherry Hill, New JerseyWillingboro, New JerseyKnoxville, Tennessee2008


Charlotte, North Carolina (Huntersville Campus)Raleigh, North Carolina (Garner Campus)Atlanta, Georgia (Lithonia Campus)Orlando, Florida (Sandlake Campus)


In 2008, we plan to open a total of nine new campuses. Two of the planned new campuses were opened in Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina for the 2008 winter term. Another two campuses have been opened in Atlanta, Georgia and Orlando, Florida for the 2008 spring term. The locations of the remaining five campuses planned for this year will be announced after all necessary regulatory approvals are obtained.

5

---



We continue to apply to operate in other states generally adjacent to our current operating region and expect to pursue approvals in those states and open campuses in favorable demographic locations in such states as part of our multi-year expansion plan, with our ultimate goal to become a nationwide university.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Expand Online.We actively market our online programs to students throughout the U.S. and to international students on a global basis. Strayer has demonstrated its success with both asynchronous (‘‘on demand’’) and synchronous (‘‘real time’’) course offerings that are favored by working adult students because of their quality and convenience. We believe that the added flexibility of being able to offer both traditional and online courses allows us to better serve our working adult students. Due to the convenience and flexibility of online courses, particularly in the asynchronous format, this medium has rapidly grown in acceptance and is expected to continue to grow. There were over 25,000 students taking at least one online course for the 2007 fall term. We intend to make additional investments in our online programs to support the continued growth in this area.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Develop corporate/institutional alliances.We believe we are well positioned to pursue significant opportunities in the large corporate/institutional market. Our convenient evening, weekend and online courses provide an attractive solution for the education and training needs of employers and their employees. We currently have employer agreements or billing arrangements of various types with many corporations and government organizations, including Bank of America, FedEx Inc., Northrop Grumman, SAIC, Sodexho USA, UPS, United States Postal Service, Verizon, Verizon Wireless and Wachovia. We are actively working with other corporations and institutions, such as community colleges, to increase the number of such arrangements and to further develop existing relationships. These relationships, once established, provide an ongoing source of new and continuing students.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Optimize the use of stockholders’ capital.We compare all uses of our capital (including but not limited to organic growth investments, acquisitions, share repurchases and dividends) in terms of return on our owners’ capital and enhancing shareholder value. In 2007, we repurchased shares of our common stock, increased our common stock dividend and declared a special dividend, which was paid in January 2008. We periodically evaluate opportunities to acquire other providers of post-secondary education. Currently, we have no commitments with regard to potential acquisitions.

Strayer University

Curriculum

Strayer University offers information technology and business-oriented curricula to equip students with specialized and practical knowledge and skills for careers in business, industry and government. Our Academic Curriculum Committee regularly reviews and revises the University’s course offerings to improve the educational programs and respond to competitive changes in job markets. We regularly evaluate new programs and degrees to ensure that we stay current with the needs of our students and their employers.

6

---



Strayer University offers programs in the following areas:

Graduate Programs


Undergraduate Programs•    Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.)
Degree


•    Bachelor of Science (B.S.) Degree
Accounting
Information Systems
(with multiple concentrations)*
Economics
International Business•    Master of Education (M.Ed.) Degree•    Master of Health Services Administration
(M.H.S.A.) Degree•    Master of Public Administration (M.P.A.)
Degree


•    Bachelor of Business Administration
(B.B.A.) Degree•    Master of Science (M.S.) Degree
Information Systems
(with multiple concentrations)
Professional Accounting


•    Associate in Arts (A.A.) Degree
Accounting
Acquisition and Contract Management
Business Administration
Information Systems
(with multiple concentrations)
Economics
General Studies Marketing•    Executive Graduate Certificate Programs
Business Administration
Information Systems
Professional Accounting


•    Diploma Programs
Accounting
Acquisition and Contract Management
Information Systems
(with multiple concentrations)•    Undergraduate Certificate Programs
Accounting
Business Administration
Information Systems


|
|
|
|

|* | In 2006, Strayer University redesigned its Information Systems programs, aligning the curriculum under one standard program with multiple concentrations. In doing so, Strayer University expanded its offerings to new concentrations including Computer Security, Database Developer, Homeland Security and Information Systems, Security Administration and Web Development.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each undergraduate degree program includes courses in oral and written communication skills as well as mathematics and various disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. In addition to our degree, diploma and certificate programs, we offer classes to non-degree and non-program students wishing to take courses for personal or professional enrichment.

Although all of our programs are generally offered at each campus, the University adapts its course offerings to the demands of the student population at each location. Strayer University students may enroll in courses at more than one campus and take courses online.

Strayer University structures its curricula to allow students to advance sequentially from one learning level to another by applying credits earned in one program toward attainment of a more advanced degree. For example, a student originally pursuing a diploma in computer information systems can extend his or her original educational objective by taking additional courses leading to an associate’s degree in computer information systems, a bachelor’s degree in computer information systems, and ultimately a master’s degree in computer information systems. This curriculum design provides students a level of competency and a measure of attainment in the event they interrupt their education or choose to work in their field of concentration prior to obtaining their final degree.

Online Programs

In August 1997, we began offering our programs online via the Internet. The University offers courses and degree programs online using both synchronous (‘‘real time’’) and asynchronous (‘‘on demand’’) approaches to online learning. The asynchronous format was first introduced by the University in the summer 2001 quarter and has grown rapidly due to increasing demand. Students may

7

---



take all of their courses online or may take online courses as a supplement to traditional, site-based courses. A student taking classes online has the same admission and financial aid requirements, policies and procedures and receives the same student services as other Strayer University students. Tuition for online courses is the same as for campus courses. During the fall 2007 quarter, Strayer University had over 25,000 students participating in its online programs, approximately 21,400 of whom took classes solely online.

Faculty

The University appoints faculty who hold appropriate academic credentials, are dedicated, active professionals in their field and are enthusiastic and committed to teaching working adults. In accordance with our educational mission, the University faculty focuses its efforts on teaching. The normal course load for a full-time faculty member is four courses per quarter for each of three quarters, or 12 courses per academic year. In addition, the University requires full-time faculty members to provide eight hours per week of student academic counseling and other student support services.

We provide financial support for faculty members seeking to update their skills and knowledge. The University maintains a tuition plan that typically reimburses full-time faculty enrolled in advanced degree programs for 75% of the tuition for one new course per term when taken at institutions other than Strayer. Deans pursuing doctorate degrees may be eligible for up to 100% tuition reimbursement. Full-time faculty (and all other employees) receive a 90% discount for all Strayer courses. The University also conducts annual in-house faculty workshops in each discipline. We believe that our dedicated and capable faculty is one of the keys to our success.

Organization of Strayer University

The University’s annual financial budget and overall academic and business decisions are directed by its Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees consists of Dr. Charlotte F. Beason, Chairwoman of the Board of Trustees, and 10 other members. The University By-Laws prescribe that a majority of voting members be unaffiliated with either University management or Strayer Education, Inc. to assure independent oversight of all academic programs and services. With the exception of the University President and the Company’s President, all of our trustees are independent, non-management members. The current Board of Trustees members are listed below:

Board of Trustees

|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. Charlotte F. Beason |  | Dr. Beason is the Chairwoman of the Board of Trustees. She has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1996. She has extensive experience in education, distance learning, and the accreditation of education programs. (See Directors and Executive Officers in Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mr. Daniel R. Abbasi |  | Mr. Abbasi has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2005. He is Director of MissionPoint Capital Partners, a private equity firm specializing in clean energy. Previously, Mr. Abbasi was Associate Dean of the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, where he remains affiliated as an advisor. In addition, he has also held management positions with Kaplan, Inc., Etrana, Inc., Time Warner, Inc., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Stanford Center on International Conflict and Negotiation. Mr. Abbasi holds a bachelor’s degree in government and an MBA, both from Harvard University. Mr. Abbasi also holds a master’s degree in political science from Stanford University.
|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

8

---



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mr. Dennis H. Blumer |  | Mr. Blumer was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. He is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Arent Fox LLP. He is also Vice President Emeritus at The George Washington University, where he served from 1995 until his retirement in 2007. He has more than 40 years of experience in higher education including previously serving as Executive Assistant to the President of the University of Maryland, College Park and in a similar capacity at the University of Wisconsin. Mr. Blumer holds a bachelor’s degree in history and a juris doctorate degree from Yale University.
|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

|                 |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mr. Roland Carey |  | Mr. Carey has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1990. He served for 23 years as a U.S. Army Officer in the specialties of Air Defense Missile Evaluation and Military Education. He retired in 1986 as a Lieutenant Colonel. Mr. Carey served 12 years as a mathematics instructor and as an Intervention Program Coordinator with Fairfax County Public Schools. Additionally, he has served on two other organizational management and supervisory boards. Mr. Carey holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Florida A&M University and a master’s degree in educational leadership from George Mason University.
|                 |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mr. Karl McDonnell |  | Mr. McDonnell was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. Mr. McDonnell joined Strayer Education, Inc. in July 2006 as President and Chief Operating Officer. (See Directors and Executive Officers in Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mr. Todd A. Milano |  | Mr. Milano has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1992 and has more than 30 years of experience in post-secondary education. Since 1989, he has served as President of Central Pennsylvania College near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. (See Directors and Executive Officers in Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. William C. Reha, MD |  | Dr. Reha was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007. He is a Board certified urologic surgeon affiliated with Potomac Hospital in Woodbridge, Virginia. He also currently serves as Vice-Speaker for the Medical Society of Virginia. Dr. Reha is active in Strayer University alumni affairs and is the 2005 Outstanding Alumni Award winner. He holds a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from Binghamton University, an M.D. from New York Medical College and an MBA from Strayer University.
|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

|                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. Peter D. Salins |  | Dr. Salins has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2002. Having served as Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs of the State University of New York (SUNY) system from 1997 to 2006, he is currently University Professor of Political Science at SUNY’s Stony Brook University.  Dr. Salins also serves on the Advisory Board of Syracuse University School of Architecture, is a Trustee of the Lavanburg Foundation, and is a Director of the Citizens Housing and Planning Council of New York. Dr. Salins holds a bachelor’s degree in architecture, and a doctorate in metropolitan studies and regional planning, both from Syracuse University.
|                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

9

---



|                       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. Sondra F. Stallard |  | Dr. Stallard was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2007 shortly after joining Strayer University as University President. Prior to joining Strayer, Dr. Stallard had a long and distinguished career at the University of Virginia. (See Directors and Executive Officers in Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)
|                       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. Donald R. Stoddard* |  | Dr. Stoddard has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1996. He served as President of Strayer University from 1997 to 2002. His background includes serving in the United States Army, university teaching with a specialty in American literature, higher education administration, a Fulbright Lectureship in Romania, and authoring many articles on literary topics. Dr. Stoddard holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration and a master’s degree in English, both from Northeastern University. He also holds a doctorate in English from the University of Pennsylvania.
|                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

|                  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. J. Chris Toe* |  | Dr. Toe has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2003. He served as President of Strayer University from 2003 to April 2006. Dr. Toe now serves as the Minister of Agriculture for the Republic of Liberia.
|                  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

|
|
|
|

|* | Non-voting member.
|- | ------------------

Within the academic, strategic and financial parameters set by the Board of Trustees, the University is managed on a daily basis by the University President. The President is charged with the responsibility of overseeing the implementation of the policies established by the Board of Trustees and is supported in this function by senior administrative officers, including the Provost. The majority of the University’s operations are centralized within the President’s office or the University’s senior administrative staff offices, such as faculty development, curriculum development, institutional research and assessments, and library administration, student records, student affairs, accounting and auditing, human resources, operations, marketing, public relations, facilities, information technology, and regulatory compliance, including oversight of the University’s participation in federal financial aid programs.

Within this centralized structure is a division of responsibilities into two broad categories: academics and administrative operations. For the academic functions, the President is supported by the Provost and the deans of schools, and oversees a group of senior administrative deans including the Dean of Student Affairs, the Director of Libraries, and the Dean of Institutional Research and Assessment. The President is also responsible for the general curriculum, University policies, as well as many regulatory compliance matters and student affairs. The Provost is responsible for implementing academic policies and programs of the University, including the supervision of the Academic Deans, Director of Programs and the Dean of Academic Development and Training.

On administrative operations, the President works closely with the Regional Directors, who are responsible for ensuring that campus and online operations meet the annual University budget and financial goals established by the Board of Trustees. Regional Directors are responsible for administrative operations at campuses within their regions of responsibility and address issues associated with the physical plant at each facility (e.g. HVAC, campus security, etc.). Other senior administrative officers also support the President in areas such as legal compliance, accounting and auditing, computer technology, insurance and human resources.

10

---



University Senior Management

Dr. Sondra F. Stallard– University President

Dr. Joel O. Nwagbaraocha– Provost and Chief Academic Officer

Randi Reich Cosentino– Senior Vice President – Academic Administration

Biographical information regarding the above senior members of University management is set forth in Item 10 below.

Similarly, at the campus level, the day-to-day business operations are managed by a Campus Director and the academic functions are overseen by a Campus Dean. Each campus is staffed with personnel performing instructional, admissions, academic advising, financial aid, student services and career development functions. A learning resource center at each campus supports the University’s instructional programs. Each learning resource center contains a library and computer laboratories and is operated by a full-time manager and support staff who assist students in the use of research resources.

Strayer Education, Inc. Executive Officers

For a description of Strayer Education, Inc.’s senior management, see the biographical information set forth in Item 10 below.

Marketing

To generate interest among potential students, we engage in a broad range of activities to inform the working adult public and their employers about the programs we offer. These activities include direct mail, Internet marketing, marketing to our existing students and graduates, print and broadcast advertising, student referrals, and corporate and government outreach activities. Direct response methods (direct mail and Internet advertising) are used to generate inquiries from potential students. Strayer University maintains booths and information tables at appropriate conferences and expos, as well as at transfer days at community colleges. Through our business-to-business outreach efforts, we market our programs to corporations with personal sales calls, distribution of information through corporate intranets and human resource departments and on-site information meetings. We implement a continuous marketing strategy to record inquiries in our database and track them through to application and registration. Additionally, we market information about new programs and new locations to students and alumni to encourage them to return for further education.

Student Profile

The majority of Strayer University students are working adults completing their first college degree to improve their job skills and advance their careers. Of the students enrolled in Strayer University’s programs at the beginning of the 2007 fall quarter, approximately 61% were age 31 or older and approximately 79% were engaged in part-time study (fewer than three courses each quarter). In the 2007 fall quarter, our students registered for an average of 8.2 course credits (about two classes per student).

Strayer University has a very diverse student population. At the beginning of the 2007 fall quarter, approximately 68% of students were minorities and approximately 66% of students were women. Approximately 3% of the University’s students were international, and approximately 3% were active duty military personnel. Strayer University prides itself on making post-secondary education accessible to working adults who missed or were previously unable to take advantage of educational opportunities.

11

---



The following is a breakdown of our students by program level as of the 2007 fall term:

Program


Number of
students


Percentage of
total studentsBachelor’s




19,909





55Master’s




10,101





28Associate




3,868





11Total Degree




33,878





94Diploma




271



*Undergraduate Certificate




140



*Graduate Certificate




198



*Undeclared




1,595





4Total Non-Degree




2,204





6Total Students




36,082





100


|
|
|
|

|* | Represents less than 1%.
|- | ------------------------

Our business is seasonal and as a result, our quarterly results of operations tend to vary within a year due to student enrollment patterns. Enrollment generally is highest in the fourth quarter, or fall term, and lowest in the third quarter, or summer term.

Student Admissions

Students attending Strayer University’s undergraduate programs must possess a high school diploma or a General Educational Development (GED) Certificate. Students attending Strayer University’s graduate programs must have a bachelor’s degree from an accredited institution and meet certain other requirements. If a student’s undergraduate major varies widely from the student’s proposed graduate course of study, certain undergraduate prerequisite courses may also be necessary for admission. To maximize undergraduate students’ chances for academic success and to ensure they receive the support they need, Strayer University evaluates incoming student’s proficiency in fundamental English and math prior to the first quarter’s registration.

International students applying for admission must meet the same admission requirements as other students. Those students whose native language is not English must provide evidence that they are able to use the English language with sufficient facility to perform college-level work in an English-speaking institution.

Tuition and Fees

Strayer charges tuition by the course. Each course is 4.5 credit hours. As of January 1, 2008, undergraduate full-time students are charged $1,355 per course. Undergraduate part-time students are charged $1,430 per course. Courses in graduate programs are charged at the rate of $1,835 per course. Accordingly, a full-time student seeking to obtain a bachelor’s degree in four years currently would pay approximately $14,000 per year in tuition. Strayer University implemented a tuition price increase of approximately 5% per course effective January 1, 2008, which is reflected in the above tuition rates. Under a variety of different programs, Strayer University offers scholarships and tuition discounts to active duty military students and in connection with various corporate and government sponsorship and tuition reimbursement arrangements.

Alternative Loan Program

The Company is no longer in the business of long-term lending to its students. From 1995 to 2003, Strayer University managed a self-funded, long-term student loan program for eligible students as an alternative to government sponsored loans. Education Loan Processing, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, administered this program for Strayer University. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the

12

---



Company sold its student loan portfolio for approximately $10 million. The Company believed that its students could be better served by professional lenders, and that the Company could avoid balance sheet risk associated with long-term lending by selling its portfolio to an established banking entity. During 2004 and 2005, the Company originated loans which it immediately divested to a long-term lender. Since 2006, all new private loans were obtained directly by students from third party lenders without being originated by the Company. In 2007, approximately 3% of the Company’s revenues were from students using private loans, of which the Company estimates 0.3% of its revenues were from private loans that lenders considered to be higher credit risk.

Career Development Services

Although most of Strayer University’s students are already employed, the University actively assists its students and alumni with job placement and other career-related matters through career development offices in each region where the University has campuses. Strayer’s career development personnel conduct workshops on employment-related topics (including resume preparation, interviewing techniques and job search strategies), maintain job listings, arrange campus interviews by employers and provide other placement assistance. Strayer University sponsors career fairs in the fall and spring quarters for students and alumni to discuss career opportunities with companies and governmental agencies.

We regularly conduct alumni surveys to monitor the career progression of our graduates and to support outcomes assessment efforts required by Middle States and state regulators.

Employees

As of December 31, 2007, Strayer University employed 1,699 faculty members, of whom 163 were full-time and 1,536 were part-time. Full-time faculty members teach on average 4-5 courses per quarter compared to adjunct faculty who normally teach one course per quarter. The University also employed 1,329 non-faculty staff in information systems, financial aid, recruitment and admissions, student administration, marketing and human resources, corporate accounting and other administrative functions. Of the University’s non-faculty staff, 1,138 were employed full-time and 191 were employed part-time.

Intellectual Property

In the ordinary course of its business, Strayer develops many kinds of intellectual property that are or will be the subject of copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret or other protections. Such intellectual property includes Strayer’s courseware materials for classes taught via the Internet or other distance-learning means and business know-how and internal processes and procedures developed to respond to the requirements of its operations and various education regulatory agencies. Strayer also claims a common law right to the mark ‘‘STRAYER’’ for educational services and has obtained federal registration of the mark.

Regulation

Regulatory Environment

The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the ‘‘Higher Education Act’’), and the regulations promulgated thereunder require all higher education institutions that participate in the various financial aid programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act (‘‘Title IV programs’’), including Strayer University, both to comply with detailed substantive and reporting requirements and to undergo periodic regulatory scrutiny. The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory responsibility for each of the following components of the higher education regulatory triad: (1) the federal government through the U.S. Department of Education (‘‘Department of Education’’); (2) the institutional accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education (‘‘Secretary of Education’’) and (3) state education regulatory bodies. The regulations, standards and policies of these regulatory agencies are subject to frequent change.

13

---



Accreditation

Strayer University has been institutionally accredited since 1981 by Middle States, a regional accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education. Accreditation is a system for recognizing educational institutions and their programs for integrity, educational quality, faculty, physical resources, administrative capability and financial stability that signifies that they are entitled to the confidence of the educational community and the public. In the United States, this recognition comes primarily through private voluntary associations of institutions and programs of higher education. These associations establish criteria for accreditation, conduct peer-review evaluations of institutions, offer professional programs for accreditation and publicly designate those institutions that meet their standards. Accredited schools are subject to periodic review by accrediting bodies to determine whether such schools maintain the performance, integrity and quality required for accreditation.

Middle States grants institutional accreditation to degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in its region (including Delaware, Washington, D.C., Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands) and distance education programs offered by those institutions. Accreditation by Middle States is an important attribute of Strayer University. Colleges and universities depend on accreditation in evaluating transfers of credit and applications to graduate schools. Employers rely on the accredited status of institutions when evaluating a candidate’s credentials, and students and corporate and government sponsors under tuition reimbursement programs look to accreditation for assurance that an institution maintains quality educational standards. Moreover, institutional accreditation is necessary to qualify for eligibility to participate in federal student financial assistance programs.

As with all its regulatory relationships, Strayer University strives to maintain close contact with, and to provide frequent status updates to, Middle States. This regular contact keeps Middle States informed of the University’s planned activities and aims to ensure that the University’s performance continues to meet Middle States’ expectations. To this end, Strayer University is committed to evaluating periodically its own performance, submitting reports to Middle States and making any necessary improvements to continue meeting Middle States’ accreditation standards as the University grows and expands geographically. If an institution’s performance were ever not to meet its accrediting agency’s (or other regulator’s) expectations or failed to meet applicable standards, then its operations could be conditioned, or severely constrained or even curtailed, depending on the severity of the non-compliance. Accordingly, Strayer University endeavors to proactively keep Middle States (and all of its other regulators) fully informed and satisfied with its performance and strives to maintain good regulatory relationships as a key University priority.

Strayer University is accredited by Middle States through 2017. In 2006, Strayer University completed a voluntary comprehensive self study report, which was submitted to Middle States to support Strayer University’s request for early reaffirmation of accreditation prior to Middle States’ next scheduled accreditation review in 2011. The Company’s objective is to provide a high quality post-secondary education to working adult students, and participation in academic peer review processes is an important way to help it meet that objective.

Middle States reviewed Strayer University’s report and on June 28, 2007, reaffirmed Strayer University’s accreditation for 10 years through 2017. In November 2007, Middle States also approved the University’s new campuses in Georgia and North Carolina. All of Strayer University’s new campus locations require Middle States approval before students are enrolled.

In 2000, the agencies that accredit higher education institutions in various regions of the United States adopted a ‘‘Policy Statement on Evaluation of Institutions Operating Interregionally.’’ Under that policy, both the ‘‘home’’ regional accreditor and the ‘‘host’’ regional accreditor cooperate to evaluate an institution that delivers education at a physical site in the host accreditor’s region. Although the home region is solely responsible for final accreditation actions, as we open campuses in regions outside Middle States’ region, the host regional accreditors may elect to participate in the accreditation process of such expansion operations.

14

---



State Education Licensure

We are authorized to offer our programs, including those offered through Strayer University Online, by the applicable educational regulatory agencies in all states where our campuses and Strayer University Online facilities are located. We are dependent upon the authorization of each state where we are physically located to allow us to operate and to grant degrees or diplomas to students in those states. We are subject to extensive regulation in each of the 13 jurisdictions (Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.) in which we currently maintain or are authorized to maintain campuses and in which we are authorized to offer educational programs, and we will be subject to similar extensive regulation in those additional states in which we may expand our operations in the future. State laws and regulations affect our operations and may limit our ability to introduce educational programs or establish new campuses. We are required by the Higher Education Act to maintain appropriate state education licensure in each state where we maintain a campus that participates in Title IV programs.

The increasing popularity and use of the Internet and other online services for the delivery of education has led and may lead to the adoption of new laws and regulatory practices in the United States or foreign countries or to interpretation of the application of existing laws and regulations to such services. These new laws and interpretations may relate to issues such as the requirement that online education institutions be licensed as a school in one or more jurisdictions where they have no physical location. New laws, regulations, or interpretations related to doing business over the Internet could increase Strayer University’s cost of doing business, affect its ability to increase enrollments and revenues, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business.

Other Approvals

We are approved by appropriate authorities for the education of veterans and members of the selective reserve and their dependents, as well as for the rehabilitation of handicapped veterans. In addition, we are authorized by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to admit foreign students for study in the United States subject to applicable requirements. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, working with the U.S. Department of State, has implemented a mandatory electronic reporting system for schools that enroll foreign students and exchange visitors.

Financing Student Education

Students finance their Strayer University education in a variety of ways. A significant number of students borrow money from banks through a partially government-guaranteed loan. In the 2007 fall term, approximately 60% of Strayer University’s students participated in one or more Title IV programs. In addition, many of our working adult students finance their own education or receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from their employers. Congress has enacted several tax credits for students pursuing higher education and has provided for a tax deduction for interest on student loans and exclusions from income of certain tuition reimbursement amounts.

Many financial aid programs are designed to assist eligible students whose financial resources are inadequate to meet the cost of education. With these programs, financial aid is awarded on the basis of financial need, generally defined under the Higher Education Act as the difference between the cost of attending a program of study and the amount a student reasonably can be expected to contribute to those expenses. All recipients of financial aid must maintain a satisfactory grade point average and progress in a timely manner toward completion of a program of study.

Title IV Programs

Strayer University maintains eligibility for its students to participate in the following Title IV programs:

| |   |                                                                                                                                                         
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Federal Pell Grants.Grants under the Federal Pell Grant (‘‘Pell’’) program are available to eligible students based on financial need and other factors.

15

---



| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Campus-Based Programs.The ‘‘campus-based’’ Title IV programs include the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program and the Federal Perkins Loan (‘‘Perkins’’) program.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Federal Family Education Loans.Pursuant to the Federal Family Education Loan Program (the ‘‘FFEL Program’’), which currently includes the Federal Stafford Loan (‘‘Stafford’’) program, the Federal Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (‘‘PLUS’’) program (which beginning on July 1, 2006 provides for making loans to graduate and professional students as well as to parents of dependent undergraduate students), and the Federal Consolidation Loan Program, students and their parents can obtain from lending institutions subsidized and unsubsidized student loans, which are guaranteed by a guaranty agency and ultimately by the federal government. Students who demonstrate financial need may qualify for a subsidized Stafford loan. With a subsidized Stafford loan, the federal government will pay the interest on the loan while the student is in school and during any approved periods of deferment, until the student’s obligation to repay the loan begins. Unsubsidized Stafford loans are available to students who do not qualify for a subsidized Stafford loan or, in some cases, in addition to a subsidized Stafford loan.

| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Federal Direct Student Loans.Under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (the ‘‘Direct Loan Program’’), the Department of Education makes loans directly to students rather than guaranteeing loans made by lending institutions. To date, Strayer University has not originated any loans under this program.

Return of Federal Funds

The 1998 amendments to the Higher Education Act that took effect on October 7, 2000, address an institution’s return-of-funds policy with regard to Title IV programs. The Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005, which amended the Higher Education Act and generally took effect on July 1, 2006, also addresses return-of-funds to Title IV programs. Under the Higher Education Act’s return-of-funds provision, an institution must return to lenders in a timely manner funds unearned by students who withdraw. The institution must first determine the amount of Title IV program funds that the student ‘‘earned.’’ If the student withdraws during the first 60% of any period of enrollment or payment period, the amount of Title IV program funds that the student earned is equal to a pro rata portion of the funds for which the student would otherwise be eligible. If the student withdraws after the 60% point, then the student has earned 100% of the Title IV program funds. The institution must return to the appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order and excluding the Federal Work-Study Program and certain other federal financial assistance programs, the lesser of the unearned Title IV program funds or the institutional charges incurred by the student for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned Title IV program funds. An institution must return the funds no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that a student withdrew. If such payments are not made in a timely manner, an institution may be subject to adverse action, including being required to submit a letter of credit equal to 25% of the refunds the institution should have made in its most recently completed fiscal year. Under Department of Education regulations, if late returns of Title IV program funds constitute 5% or more of students sampled in the institution’s annual compliance audit, an institution generally must submit an irrevocable letter of credit payable to the Secretary of Education. In June 2007, the University issued the Department of Education an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $1.2 million, which expires in June 2008, in connection with this regulation.

Other Financial Aid Programs

Eligible students at Strayer University may also participate in educational assistance programs administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. Department of Defense, the District of Columbia, the State of Pennsylvania, and private organizations.

Financial Aid Regulation

To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, Strayer University must comply with specific standards and procedures set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued thereunder

16

---



by the Department of Education. An institution must, among other things, be authorized by each state within which it is physically located to offer its educational programs and maintain institutional accreditation by a recognized accrediting agency. The institution also must be certified by the Department of Education to participate in Title IV programs, based on a determination that, among other things, the institution meets certain standards of administrative capability and financial responsibility. For purposes of the Title IV programs, Strayer University and all of its campuses are considered to be a single ‘‘institution of higher education’’ so that Department of Education requirements applicable to an ‘‘institution of higher education’’ are generally applied to all of Strayer University’s campuses in the aggregate rather than on an individual basis. Strayer University and each of its campuses are currently certified to participate in Title IV programs.

Congress reauthorizes the Higher Education Act approximately every five to six years. Congress most recently comprehensively reauthorized the Higher Education Act in 1998. On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 which includes the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005. Among other measures, the Higher Education Reconciliation Act reauthorized the Higher Education Act with respect to the federal guaranteed student loan program. On October 31, 2007, President Bush signed the Third Higher Education Extension Act to extend to March 31, 2008 the other programs authorized by the Higher Education Act. Congress is expected to consider reauthorization of those programs in 2008. On September 27, 2007, President Bush signed legislation, generally effective October 1, 2007, that, among other measures, reduced interest rates on certain federal student loans and reduced government subsidies to lenders that participate in federal student loan programs. In addition, Congress reviews and determines appropriations for Title IV programs on an annual basis. An elimination of certain Title IV programs, a reduction in federal funding levels of such programs, material changes in the requirements for participation in such programs, or the substitution of materially different programs could reduce the ability of certain students to finance their education. This, in turn, could lead to lower enrollments at Strayer University or require Strayer University to increase its reliance upon alternative sources of student financial aid. Given the significant percentage of Strayer University’s revenues that are derived indirectly from the Title IV programs, the loss of or a significant reduction in Title IV program funds available to Strayer University’s students could have a material adverse effect on Strayer.

The regulations applicable to Strayer University have been subject to frequent revisions, many of which have increased the level of scrutiny to which higher education institutions are subjected and have raised applicable standards. If Strayer University were not to continue to comply with such regulations, such non-compliance might affect the operations of the University and its ability to participate in Title IV programs. Certain elements of the regulations applicable to Strayer University are described below.

Administrative Capability

Department of Education regulations specify extensive criteria by which an institution must establish that it has the requisite ‘‘administrative capability’’ to participate in Title IV programs. To meet the administrative capability standards, an institution, among other things, must comply with all applicable Title IV program regulations, must not have cohort default rates above specified levels, must have various procedures in place for safeguarding federal funds, must not be, and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred or suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity that is cause for debarment or suspension, must submit in a timely manner all reports and financial statements required by the regulations and must not otherwise appear to lack administrative capability.

Provisional Certification

In certain circumstances, including a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, the Department of Education may certify an institution’s continuing eligibility to participate in Title IV programs on a provisional basis that may extend no longer than through the end of the third complete award year (July 1 – June 30) from the date of provisional certification. During the period of

17

---



provisional certification, the institution must comply with any additional conditions included in its program participation agreement. If the Department of Education determines that a provisionally certified institution is unable to meet its responsibilities under its program participation agreement, it may seek to revoke or further condition the institution’s certification to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections for the institution than if it were fully certified. Strayer University’s current program participation agreement is not provisional and does not expire until September 30, 2010, assuming compliance with its terms.

Third Party Servicers

Department of Education regulations permit an institution to enter into a written contract with a third-party servicer for the administration of any aspect of the institution’s participation in Title IV programs. The third-party servicer must, among other obligations, comply with Title IV requirements and be jointly and severally liable with the institution to the Secretary of Education for any violation by the servicer of any Title IV provision. An institution must report to the Department of Education new contracts or any significant modifications to contracts with third-party servicers as well as other matters related to third-party servicers. Strayer University has written contracts with four third-party servicers: Weber & Associates, Inc., Global Financial Aid Services, Inc., Post-secondary Education Assistance Corporation, and Financial Aid Management for Education, Inc. The servicers each perform activities related to Strayer University’s participation in Title IV programs, such as certifying FFEL Program loan applications, preparing reports from Strayer University to the Department of Education, issuing payments for the Pell and campus-based programs and issuing and collecting Perkins loans. Because Strayer University is jointly and severally liable to the Department of Education for the actions of third-party servicers, failure of such servicers to abide by applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on Strayer University.

Financial Responsibility

The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations establish extensive standards of financial responsibility that institutions such as Strayer University must satisfy in order to participate in Title IV programs. These standards generally require that an institution provide the services described in its official publications and statements, properly administer the Title IV programs in which it participates and meet all of its financial obligations, including required refunds and any repayments to the Department of Education for debts and liabilities incurred in programs administered by the Department of Education.

Department of Education standards utilize a complex formula to assess financial responsibility. The standards focus on three financial ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the institution’s capital resources and ability to borrow); (2) primary reserve ratio (which measures the institution’s financial viability and liquidity) and (3) net income ratio (which measures the institution’s ability to operate at a profit or within its means). An institution’s financial ratios must yield a composite score of at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially responsible without the need for further federal oversight. Strayer University has applied the financial responsibility standards to its audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and calculated a composite score of 3.0, the highest score available. Strayer therefore believes that Strayer University meets the Department of Education’s financial responsibility standards.

Student Loan Defaults

Under the Higher Education Act, an educational institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all of the Title IV programs if defaults on the repayment of federally guaranteed student loans by its students exceed certain levels. For each federal fiscal year, a rate of student defaults (known as a ‘‘cohort default rate’’) is calculated for each institution with 30 or more borrowers entering repayment in a given federal fiscal year by determining the rate at which borrowers who become subject to their repayment obligation in that federal fiscal year default by the end of the following federal fiscal year. For such institutions, the Department of Education calculates a single

18

---



cohort default rate for each federal fiscal year that includes in the cohort all current or former student borrowers at the institution who entered repayment on any FFEL Program or Direct Loan Program loan during that year.

Under applicable regulations, if the Department of Education notifies an institution that its three most recent cohort default rates are each 25% or greater, the institution’s participation in the FFEL Program, Direct Loan Program and Federal Pell Grant Program ends 30 days after the notification, unless the institution timely appeals that determination on specified grounds and according to specified procedures. An institution’s participation in the FFEL Program and Direct Loan Program ends 30 days after notification that its most recent cohort default rate is greater than 40%, unless the institution timely appeals that determination on specified grounds and according to specified procedures. An institution whose participation ends under these provisions may not participate in the relevant programs for the remainder of the fiscal year in which the institution receives the notification, as well as for the next two fiscal years. The regulations also address cohort default rates for institutions that have undergone a change in status, such as acquisition or merger of institutions and acquisition of another institution’s branches or locations.

Under certain circumstances, the Department of Education may decide to place an institution on provisional certification if the institution’s cohort default rate equals or exceeds 25% in any of the three most recent federal fiscal years. Provisional certification does not limit an institution’s access to Title IV program funds; however, an institution with provisional status is subject to closer review by the Department of Education and may be subject to summary adverse action if it violates Title IV program requirements. Strayer University’s cohort default rates on FFEL Program loans for the 2003, 2004, and 2005 federal fiscal years, the three most recent years for which this information is available, were 2.7%, 4.5%, and 3.9%, respectively. The average cohort default rates for proprietary institutions nationally were 7.3%, 8.6%, and 8.2% in federal fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005, respectively.

The ‘‘90/10 Rule’’

Under what is commonly referred to as the ‘‘90/10 Rule,’’ the Higher Education Act provides that proprietary institutions of higher education, such as Strayer University, are eligible to participate in Title IV programs only if they derive no more than 90% of their revenues from Title IV programs during their latest complete fiscal year, as determined in accordance with a formula described in the Department of Education’s regulations. A proprietary institution that violates the ‘‘90/10 Rule’’ loses its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs as of the first day of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which it exceeds 90%, and it is unable to apply to regain its eligibility until the next fiscal year. Using the Department of Education’s formula, Strayer University derived approximately 72% of its cash-basis revenues from eligible programs in 2006 compared to 71% in 2005 and 72% in 2004.

Incentive Compensation

As a part of an institution’s program participation agreement with the Department of Education and in accordance with the Higher Education Act, the institution may not provide any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruitment, admissions or financial aid awarding activity. Failure to comply with the incentive payment rule could result in loss of ability to participate in federal student financial aid programs or in financial penalties. Although there can be no assurance that the Department of Education would not find deficiencies in Strayer University’s present or former employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements, Strayer University believes that its employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements comply with the incentive compensation provisions of the Higher Education Act.

Compliance Reviews

Strayer University is subject to announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies, including the Department of Education, its Office of Inspector General, state licensing agencies, guaranty agencies and accrediting agencies. The Higher Education Act and

19

---



Department of Education regulations also require an institution to submit annually to the Secretary of Education a compliance audit of its administration of the Title IV programs conducted by an independent certified public accountant in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and applicable audit guides of the Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General. In addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a determination of financial responsibility, an institution must submit annually to the Secretary of Education audited financial statements prepared in accordance with Department of Education regulations.

Potential Effect of Regulatory Violations

If Strayer University fails to comply with the regulatory standards governing Title IV programs, the Department of Education could impose one or more sanctions, including transferring Strayer University from the advance payment method to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment, seeking to require repayment of certain Title IV funds, requiring the University to post a letter of credit in favor of the Department of Education as a condition for continued Title IV certification, taking emergency action against the University, referring the matter for criminal prosecution or initiating proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, condition, suspend or terminate the participation of the University in Title IV programs. In addition, Strayer University’s guaranty agencies could initiate proceedings to limit, suspend or terminate Strayer University’s eligibility to provide guaranteed student loans in the event of certain regulatory violations. Although there are no such sanctions currently in force, and Strayer University does not believe any such sanctions or proceedings are presently contemplated, if such sanctions or proceedings were imposed against Strayer University and resulted in a substantial curtailment, or termination, of the University’s participation in Title IV programs, Strayer University would be materially and adversely affected.

If Strayer University lost its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or if the amount of available federal student financial aid were reduced, the University would seek to arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or financial aid for students. Although the University believes that one or more private organizations would be willing to provide financial assistance to students attending Strayer University, there is no assurance that this would be the case, and the interest rate and other terms of such student financial aid might not be as favorable as those for Title IV program funds. Strayer University might be required to guarantee all or part of such alternative assistance or might incur other additional costs in connection with securing alternative sources of financial aid. Accordingly, the loss of eligibility of Strayer University to participate in Title IV programs, or a reduction in the amount of available federal student financial aid, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on Strayer University even if it could arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or student financial aid.

Restrictions on Adding Locations and Educational Programs

State requirements and accrediting agency standards limit the ability of Strayer University to establish additional locations and programs. Most states require approval before institutions can add new programs, campuses or teaching locations. Middle States requires institutions that it accredits to notify it in advance of implementing new programs or locations, which may require additional approval. At its discretion, Middle States may also conduct site visits to additional locations to ensure that accredited institutions that experience rapid growth in the number of additional locations maintain educational quality. All new Strayer University campus locations require Middle States approval before students are enrolled (see ‘‘Accreditation,’’ above).

The Higher Education Act requires proprietary institutions of higher education to be in full operation for two years before qualifying to participate in Title IV programs. However, the applicable regulations in many circumstances permit an institution that is already qualified to participate in Title IV programs to establish additional locations that are exempt from the two-year rule. Such additional locations generally may qualify immediately for participation in the Title IV programs, unless the location was acquired from another institution that has ceased offering educational programs at that location and has Title IV liabilities that it is not repaying in accordance with an agreement to do so,

20

---



and the acquiring institution does not agree, among other matters, to be responsible for certain liabilities of the acquired institution. The new location must satisfy all other applicable requirements for institutional eligibility, including approval of the additional location by the relevant state authorizing agency and the institution’s accrediting agency. Strayer University’s expansion plans assume its continued ability to establish new campuses as additional locations of Strayer University under such applicable regulations and thereby to avoid incurring the two-year delay in participation in Title IV programs. The loss of state authorization or accreditation of Strayer University or an existing campus, or the failure of Strayer University or a new campus to obtain state authorization or accreditation, would render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs at least in that state or at that location.

Department of Education regulations require institutions to report to the Department of Education a new additional location at which at least 50% of an eligible program will be offered, if the institution wants to disburse Title IV program funds to students enrolled at that location. For an institution like Strayer University for which notice only is required, once the institution reports the location to the Department of Education, the institution may disburse Title IV program funds to eligible students at that location if the location is licensed and accredited. Institutions are responsible for knowing whether they need approval, and institutions that add locations and disburse Title IV program funds without having obtained any necessary approval may be subject to administrative repayments and other sanctions.

Generally, if an institution eligible to participate in Title IV programs adds an educational program after it has been designated as an eligible institution, the institution must apply to the Department of Education to have the additional program designated as eligible. However, a degree-granting institution such as Strayer University is not obligated to obtain Department of Education approval of additional programs that lead to an associate, bachelor’s, professional or graduate degree at a level already granted. Similarly, an institution is not required to obtain advance approval for new programs that both prepare students for gainful employment in the same or related recognized occupation as an educational program that has previously been designated as an eligible program at that institution and meet certain minimum-length requirements. In the event that an institution that does not have the Department of Education’s express approval for the addition of a new program erroneously determines that the new educational program is eligible for Title IV funds, the institution may be liable for repayment of Title IV aid received by the institution or students in connection with that program. Strayer does not believe that the Department of Education’s regulations will create significant obstacles to Strayer University’s plans to add new programs.

Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control

Many states and accrediting agencies require institutions of higher education to report or obtain approval of certain changes in ownership or other aspects of institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary among states and accrediting agencies. In addition, Strayer University’s accrediting agency, Middle States, requires institutions that it accredits to inform it in advance of any substantive change, including a change that significantly alters the ownership or control of the institution. Examples of substantive changes requiring advance notice to and approval of Middle States include changes in the legal status, ownership or form of control of the institution, such as the sale of a proprietary institution. Middle States must approve a substantive change in advance in order to include the change in the institution’s accreditation status. Middle States will undertake a site visit to an institution that has undergone a change in ownership or control no later than six months after the change.

The Higher Education Act provides that an institution that undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control loses its eligibility to participate in the Title IV programs and must apply to the Department of Education in order to reestablish such eligibility. An institution is ineligible to receive Title IV program funds during the period prior to recertification. The Higher Education Act provides that the Department of Education may temporarily, provisionally certify an institution seeking approval of a change of ownership and control based on preliminary review by the Department of Education of a materially complete application received by the Department of

21

---



Education within 10 business days after the transaction. The Department of Education may continue such temporary, provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until it has rendered a final decision on the institution’s application. If the Department of Education determines to approve the application after a change in ownership and control, it issues a provisional certification, which extends for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete award year following the date of provisional certification. The Higher Education Act defines one of the events that would trigger a change in ownership resulting in a change of control as the transfer of the controlling interest of the stock of the institution or its parent corporation. For a publicly traded corporation, the securities of which are required to be registered under the Exchange Act, such as Strayer, the Department of Education regulations implementing the Higher Education Act define a change in ownership resulting in a change of control as occurring when a person acquires ownership and control of a corporation such that the corporation is required to file a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) notifying that agency of the change of control. The regulations also provide that a change in ownership and control of a publicly traded corporation occurs if a person who is a controlling stockholder of the corporation ceases to be a controlling stockholder. A controlling stockholder is a stockholder who holds or controls through agreement both 25% or more of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and more shares of voting stock than any other stockholder.

Strayer University currently has Department of Homeland Security approval to admit foreign students for U.S. study, subject to applicable regulations. In certain circumstances, the Department of Homeland Security may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.

Pursuant to federal law providing benefits for veterans and reservists, some of the programs offered by Strayer University are approved for the enrollment of persons eligible to receive Veterans Administration educational benefits by the state approving agency in Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. In certain circumstances, state approving agencies may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.

If Strayer University underwent a change of control that required approval by any state authority, Middle States or any federal agency, and any required regulatory approval were significantly delayed, limited or denied, there could be a material adverse effect on Strayer University’s ability to offer certain educational programs, award certain degrees, diplomas or certificates, operate one or more of its locations, admit certain students or participate in Title IV programs, which in turn would materially and adversely affect Strayer University’s operations. A change that required approval by a state regulatory authority, Middle States or a federal agency could also delay Strayer University’s ability to establish new campuses or educational programs and may have other adverse regulatory effects. Furthermore, the suspension from Title IV programs and the necessity of obtaining regulatory approvals in connection with a change of control may materially limit Strayer University’s flexibility in future financing or acquisition transactions.

Additional Information

We maintain a website at www.strayereducation.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only. We make available on our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

The Form 10-K and other reports filed with the SEC can be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC; the website address is www.sec.gov.

22

---



Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the documents incorporated by reference herein before deciding to purchase our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could materially harm our business, and you could suffer a partial or complete loss of your investment. See ‘‘Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.’’

Risks Related to Extensive Regulation of Our Business

If we fail to comply with the extensive regulatory requirements for our business, we could face significant monetary liabilities, fines and penalties, including loss of access to federal student loans and grants for our students.

As a provider of higher education, we are subject to extensive regulation on both the federal and state levels. In particular, the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the ‘‘Higher Education Act’’), and related regulations subject Strayer University and all other higher education institutions that participate in the various federal student financial aid programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act (‘‘Title IV programs’’) to significant regulatory scrutiny.

The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory responsibilities for each of the following components of the higher education regulatory triad: (1) the federal government through the U.S. Department of Education (the ‘‘Department of Education’’); (2) the accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education (‘‘Secretary of Education’’) and (3) state education regulatory bodies.

The regulations, standards and policies of these regulatory agencies frequently change, and changes in, or new interpretations of, applicable laws, regulations or standards could have a material adverse effect on our accreditation, authorization to operate in various states, permissible activities, receipt of funds under Title IV programs or costs of doing business.

If we are found to be in noncompliance with any of these regulations, standards or policies, we could lose our access to Title IV program funds, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. In the 2007 fall term, approximately 60% of our students participated in one or more Title IV programs. Findings of noncompliance also could result in our being required to pay monetary damages, or being subjected to fines, penalties, injunctions, restrictions on our access to Title IV program funds or other censure that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we fail to maintain our institutional accreditation, we would lose our ability to participate in Title IV programs.

Strayer University is institutionally accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (‘‘Middle States’’), one of the six regional accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary of Education as a reliable authority as to educational quality. Accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education is required in order for an institution to become and remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of accreditation would, among other things, render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, an adverse action by Middle States other than loss of accreditation, such as issuance of a warning, could have a material adverse effect on our business or have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

If we fail to maintain any of our state authorizations, we would lose our ability to operate in that state and to participate in Title IV programs there.

With respect to each campus, Strayer University is authorized to operate and to grant degrees, diplomas or certificates by the applicable education agency of the state where the campus is located.

23

---



Such state authorization is required in order for students at the campus to be eligible to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of authorization in a state would, among other things, render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs at least at those state campus locations, limit Strayer University’s ability to operate in that state and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A failure to demonstrate ‘‘administrative capability’’ or ‘‘financial responsibility’’ may result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

If we fail to maintain ‘‘administrative capability’’ as defined by the Department of Education, we could lose our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or have that eligibility adversely conditioned, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, if we fail to demonstrate ‘‘financial responsibility’’ under the Department of Education’s regulations, we could lose our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or have that eligibility adversely conditioned, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Student loan defaults could result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

In general, under the Higher Education Act, an educational institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs if, for three consecutive federal fiscal years, 25% or more of its students who were required to begin repaying their student loans in the relevant federal fiscal year default on their payment by the end of the next federal fiscal year. In addition, an institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs if its default rate for a federal fiscal year was greater than 40%. If we lose eligibility to participate in Title IV programs because of high student loan default rates, it would have a material adverse effect on our business. Strayer University’s default rates calculated by the Department of Education on Federal Family Education Loan Program loans for the 2003, 2004, and 2005 federal fiscal years, the three most recent years for which this information is available, were 2.7%, 4.5%, and 3.9%, respectively. The average cohort default rates for proprietary institutions nationally, as calculated by the Department of Education, were 7.3%, 8.6%, and 8.2% in federal fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005, respectively.

We are subject to sanctions if we fail to calculate and make timely payment of refunds of Title IV program funds for students who withdraw before completing their educational program.

The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations require us to calculate refunds of unearned Title IV program funds disbursed to students who withdraw from their educational program before completing it. If refunds are not properly calculated or timely paid, we may be sanctioned or subject to other adverse actions by the Department of Education, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are dependent on the renewal and maintenance of Title IV programs.

Congress reauthorizes the Higher Education Act, which is the law governing Title IV programs, approximately every five to six years. Congress is currently considering re-authorization of the Higher Education Act. Additionally, Congress determines the funding level for each Title IV program on an annual basis. Any action by Congress that significantly reduces funding for Title IV programs or the ability of our school or students to participate in these programs could materially harm our business. A reduction in government funding levels could lead to lower enrollments at our school and require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students. Lower student enrollments or our inability to arrange such alternative sources of funding could adversely affect our business.

Investigations and legislative regulatory developments related to the student loan industry and relationships between loan providers and educational institutions and their financial aid officers may result in fewer lenders and loan products and increased regulatory burdens and costs.

The student lending practices of postsecondary educational institutions, financial aid officers and student loan providers are currently subject to several investigations being conducted by state

24

---



attorneys general, Congress and governmental agencies, including the Department of Education. These investigations concern, among other things, possible deceptive practices in the marketing of private student loans and loans provided by lenders pursuant to Title IV programs. These investigations and legislative and regulatory developments may cause some lenders to decide not to participate in the FFEL Program or not to provide certain loan products and may impose increased administrative and regulatory costs. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our school could lose its eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid programs if the percentage of our revenues derived from those programs were too high.

A proprietary institution loses its eligibility to participate in the federal student financial aid programs if it derives more than 90% of its revenues, on a cash basis, from these programs in any fiscal year. Using the Department of Education’s formula, we derived approximately 72% of our cash-basis revenues from these programs in 2006.

Our failure to comply with the Department of Education’s incentive compensation rules could result in sanctions.

If we pay a bonus, commission or other incentive payment in violation of applicable requirements, we could be subject to sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Our Business

We may not be able to sustain our recent growth rate, and we may not be able to manage future growth effectively.

We have experienced a period of significant growth since the beginning of 2001. Over this period, we opened 41 new campuses and our revenue increased 22% between 2000 and 2007 on a compound annual basis. Our ability to sustain our current rate of growth depends on a number of factors, including our ability to obtain regulatory approvals, our ability to recruit and retain high quality academic and administrative personnel at new campuses and competitive factors. In addition, growth and expansion of our operations may place a significant strain on our resources and increased demands on our management information and reporting systems, financial management controls and personnel. Although we have made a substantial investment in augmenting our financial and management information systems and other resources to support future growth, we cannot assure you that we will be able to manage further expansion effectively. Failure to do so could adversely affect our business.

Our future success depends in part upon our ability to recruit and retain key personnel.

In connection with our May 2001 recapitalization, we hired a new management team, including Robert S. Silberman, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, to implement our growth strategy. Our success to date has been, and our continuing success will be, substantially dependent upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, faculty and administrators and other key personnel. If we cease to employ any of these integral personnel or fail to manage a smooth transition to new personnel, our business could suffer.

Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the content of existing programs and develop new programs in a cost-effective manner and on a timely basis.

Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the content of our programs, develop new programs in a cost-effective manner and meet students’ needs in a timely manner. Prospective employers of our graduates increasingly demand that their entry-level employees possess appropriate technological and other skills. The update and expansion of our existing programs and the development of new programs may not be accepted by students, prospective employers or the online

25

---



education market. If we cannot respond to changes in industry requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to develop acceptable new programs, we may not be able to introduce these new programs as quickly as students require due to regulatory constraints or as quickly as our competitors introduce competing new programs.

Our strategy of opening new campuses and adding new services is dependent on regulatory approvals and requires significant resources.

Establishing new locations and adding new services require us to make human capital and financial capital investments, incur marketing expenses and reallocate other resources. To open a new location, we are required to obtain appropriate federal, state, and accrediting agency approvals, which may be conditioned or delayed in a manner which could significantly affect our growth plans. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully open new campus locations or add new services in the future. Our failure to effectively manage the operations of newly established locations could adversely affect our business.

Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to continue to develop awareness of the programs we offer among working adult students.

The continued development of awareness of the programs we offer among working adult students is critical to the continued acceptance and growth of our programs. If we are unable to continue to develop awareness of the programs we offer, this could limit our enrollments and negatively impact our business. The following are some of the factors that could prevent us from successfully marketing our programs:

| |   |                                              
| | - | ---------------------------------------------
| | • | the emergence of more successful competitors;

| |   |                                                         
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------
| | • | customer dissatisfaction with our services and programs;

| |   |                                                  
| | - | -------------------------------------------------
| | • | performance problems with our online systems; and

| |   |                                                                                       
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our failure to maintain or expand our brand or other factors related to our marketing.

We face strong competition in the post-secondary education market.

Post-secondary education in our market area is highly competitive. We compete with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges, other for-profit schools and alternatives to higher education, such as employment and military service. Public colleges may offer programs similar to those of Strayer University at a lower tuition level as a result of government subsidies, government and foundation grants, tax-deductible contributions and other financial sources not available to proprietary institutions. Some of our competitors in both the public and private sectors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.

Strayer University Online and Strayer University do not rely on exclusive proprietary rights and intellectual property, and competitors may attempt to duplicate Strayer programs and methods.

Third parties may attempt to develop competing programs or duplicate or copy aspects of Strayer University’s curriculum, online library, quality management and other proprietary content. Any such attempt, if successful, could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of its business, Strayer develops intellectual property of many kinds that is or will be the subject of copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret or other protections. Such intellectual property includes but is not limited to Strayer’s courseware materials for classes taught via the Internet or via other distance learning means and business know-how and internal processes and procedures developed to respond to the requirements of its various education regulatory agencies.

Seasonal and other fluctuations in our operating results could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which cause our operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. This fluctuation may result in volatility or have an adverse effect on the

26

---



market price of our common stock. We experience, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our revenue. Historically, our quarterly revenues and income have been lowest in the third quarter (July through September) because fewer students are enrolled during the summer months. We also incur significant expenses in preparing for our peak enrollment in the fourth quarter (October through December), including investing in online and campus infrastructure necessary to support increased usage. These investments result in fluctuations in our operating results which could result in volatility or have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, because of the recent increase in the use of personal computers and access to the Internet, the online education market is a rapidly evolving market, and we may not be able to accurately forecast future enrollment growth and revenues.

Regulatory requirements may make it more difficult to acquire us.

A change in ownership resulting in a change of control of Strayer would trigger a requirement for recertification of Strayer University by the Department of Education for purposes of participation in federal student financial aid programs, a review of Strayer University’s accreditation by Middle States and reauthorization of Strayer University by certain state licensing and other regulatory agencies. If we underwent a change of control that required approval by any state authority, Middle States or any federal agency, and any required regulatory approval were significantly delayed, limited or denied, there could be a material adverse effect on our ability to offer certain educational programs, award certain degrees, diplomas or certificates, operate one or more of our locations, admit certain students or participate in Title IV programs, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business. These factors may discourage takeover attempts.

Capacity constraints or system disruptions to Strayer University’s computer networks could damage the reputation of Strayer University and limit our ability to attract and retain students.

The performance and reliability of Strayer University’s computer networks, especially the online educational platform, is critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain students. Any system error or failure, or a sudden and significant increase in traffic, could result in the unavailability of Strayer University’s computer networks. We cannot assure you that Strayer University, including its online educational platform, will be able to expand its program infrastructure on a timely basis sufficient to meet demand for its programs. Strayer University’s computer systems and operations could be vulnerable to interruption or malfunction due to events beyond its control, including natural disasters and telecommunications failures. Any interruption to Strayer University’s computer systems or operations could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain students.

Strayer University’s computer networks may be vulnerable to security risks that could disrupt operations and require it to expend significant resources.

Strayer University’s computer networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses and other security problems. A user who circumvents security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. As a result, Strayer University may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of these security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches.

Strayer University, with its online programs, operates in a highly competitive market with rapid technological changes and it may not compete successfully.

Online education is a highly fragmented and competitive market that is subject to rapid technological change. Competitors vary in size and organization from traditional colleges and universities, many of which have some form of online education programs, to for-profit schools, corporate universities and software companies providing online education and training software. We expect the online education and training market to be subject to rapid changes in technologies. Strayer University’s success will depend on its ability to adapt to these changing technologies.

We may not be able to successfully complete or integrate any future acquisitions.

As part of our growth strategy, we expect to consider selective acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete any acquisitions on favorable terms, or that if we do, we

27

---



will be able to successfully integrate the personnel, operations and technologies of any such acquisitions. Our failure to successfully complete or integrate future acquisitions could disrupt our business and materially and adversely affect our profitability and liquidity by distracting our management and employees and increasing our expenses. In addition, because an acquisition is considered a change in ownership and control of the acquired institution under applicable regulatory standards, we must seek approval from the Department of Education, if the acquired institution participates in Title IV programs, and most applicable state agencies and accrediting agencies and possibly other regulatory bodies when we acquire an institution. If we were unable to obtain such approvals of an institution we acquired, depending on the size of that acquisition, that failure could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

There are no SEC staff comments on the Company’s periodic SEC reports which are unresolved.

Item 2.    Properties

We lease all of our campus and administrative facilities except for five campus facilities which we own. Our campuses are located in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and our corporate headquarters is located in Virginia. Our leases generally range from five to 10 years with one to two renewal options for extended terms. As of December 31, 2007, we leased 54 campus and administrative facilities consisting of approximately 800,000 square feet. The facilities that we own consist of approximately 110,000 square feet.

We evaluate current utilization of our facilities and projected enrollment growth to determine facility needs. We anticipate that approximately an additional 150,000 square feet will be leased in 2008.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and other legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no pending material legal proceedings to which the Company is subject or to which the Company’s property is subject.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were voted upon by stockholders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

28

---



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol ‘‘STRA.’’ The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, and closing sale prices of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ National Market.

High


Low


Close2007First Quarter



$
126.19




$
104.62




$
125.00Second Quarter



$
133.64




$
119.19




$
131.71Third Quarter



$
175.90




$
131.65




$
168.63Fourth Quarter



$
195.91




$
167.00




$
170.582006First Quarter



$
104.49




$
87.07




$
102.26Second Quarter



$
112.00




$
94.34




$
97.12Third Quarter



$
111.49




$
92.59




$
108.21Fourth Quarter



$
118.88




$
100.84




$
106.05


Peer Group Performance Graph

The following performance graph compares the Company’s cumulative stockholder return on its common stock since December 31, 2002 with The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and a self-determined peer group consisting of Apollo Group, Inc. (APOL), Career Education Corporation (CECO), Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (COCO), DeVry, Inc. (DV), and ITT Educational Services, Inc. (ESI). At present, there is no comparative index for the education industry. This graph is not deemed to be ‘‘soliciting material’’ or to be filed with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and the graph shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

29

---



Comparison of 60 Month Cumulative Total Return*
Among Strayer Education, Inc.




Name


12/31/02


12/31/03


12/31/04


12/31/05


12/31/06


12/31/07Strayer Education, Inc.




100





189





191





163





184





297NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.)




100





150





163





165





181





199Peer Group




100





163





169





139





113





174


|
|
|
|

|* | The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2002 in the Company’s common stock, the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and the peer companies selected by the Company.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Peer group consists of Apollo Group, Inc., Career Education Corporation, Corinthian Colleges, Inc., DeVry, Inc. and ITT Educational Services, Inc.

As of January 31, 2008, there were 14,426,634 shares of common stock outstanding, and approximately 63 holders of record. In addition, there are a number (approximately 14,600 as of October 2007) of institutional and other holders of common stock whose shares are held in nominee accounts by brokers.

In November 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase shares of common stock in open market purchases from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s management, depending on market conditions and other corporate considerations. The Company’s Board of Directors amended the program on various dates, increasing the repurchase amount authorized and extending the expiration date. At December 31, 2007, approximately $82 million of the Company’s share repurchase authorization was remaining. All of the Company’s share repurchases were effected in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This share repurchase plan may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time by the Company without notice.

30

---



A summary of the Company’s share repurchases since the inception of the plan is as follows:

Total
number of
shares
repurchased


Average
dollar price
paid per
share


Cost of share
repurchases
(dollars in
millions)2003




32,350





99.57





3.22004




346,444





106.13





36.82005




410,071





92.59





38.02006




349,066





100.39





35.02007




260,818





146.05





38.1Total




1,398,749





108.02





151.1


A summary of the Company’s share repurchases during the three months ended December 31, 2007 is as follows:

Total
number of
shares
repurchased1


Average
dollar price
paid per
share


Remaining
authorization
under the plan
(dollars in
millions)October




—





—November




102,904





175.86December




—





—Total




102,904





175.86





81.9


|
|
|
|

|1. | All shares repurchased were part of a publicly announced plan.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------

We have established a policy of declaring quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Consistent with this policy, we have paid common stock dividends on a quarterly basis for more than the past seven years. The Company announced in November 2007 that, commencing with its fourth quarter dividend paid on December 10, 2007, it was increasing its annual common stock dividend by 20% to $1.50 per share from $1.25 per share. This increase in annual dividend resulted in a quarterly dividend payment of $0.375 per share. At the same time, the Company also announced a special common stock cash dividend of $2.00 per share that was paid on January 16, 2008 to all shareholders of record on January 2, 2008. Whether to declare dividends and the amount of dividends to be paid in the future will be reviewed periodically by our Board of Directors in light of the Company’s earnings, cash flow, financial condition, capital needs, investment opportunities and regulatory considerations. There is no requirement or assurance that common dividends will continue to be paid.

31

---



Set forth in the table below is information pertaining to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans. There are options but no warrants or other rights existing under these plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
as of December 31, 2007

Plan Category


Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights


Weighted average
exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights


Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))(a)


(b)


(c)1.


Equity compensation plans previously approved by security holdersA.1996 Stock Option Plan as amended at the May 2001, the May 2005, and the May 2006 annual shareholders’ meetings




390,084




$
71.35





463,4702.


Equity compensation plans not previously approved by security holders




—





—





—Total




390,084




$
71.35





463,470


Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth, for the periods and at the dates indicated, selected consolidated financial and operating data. The financial information has been derived from our consolidated financial statements.

The information set forth below is qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and other information included elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

32

---



Year Ended December 31,2003


2004


2005


2006


2007(in thousands, except per share, enrollment and campus data)Income Statement Data:Revenues



$
147,025




$
183,194




$
220,507




$
263,648




$
318,012Costs and expenses:Instruction and educational support




53,116





63,860





76,977





91,120





108,852Selling and promotion




22,768





29,435





41,090





52,269





60,760General and administration




20,013





24,416





27,576





40,723





50,843Gain on sale of asset.




1,772





—





—





—





—Income from operations




52,900





65,483





74,864





79,536





97,557Investment and other income




2,420





1,595





2,982





4,542





6,495Income before income taxes




55,320





67,078





77,846





84,078





104,052Provision for income taxes




21,646





25,838





29,781





31,771





39,115Net income




33,674





41,240





48,065





52,307





64,937Preferred stock dividends and accretion(a)




5,136





1,389





—





—





—Net income available to common stockholders



$
28,538




$
39,851




$
48,065




$
52,307




$
64,937Net income per share:Basic



$
2.67




$
2.91




$
3.32




$
3.69




$
4.56Diluted



$
2.27




$
2.74




$
3.26




$
3.61




$
4.47Weighted average shares outstanding:Basic




10,694





13,674





14,472





14,187





14,248Diluted(b)




14,857





15,057





14,741





14,492





14,517Other Data:Depreciation and amortization



$
4,367




$
5,375




$
6,619




$
7,059




$
8,523Stock-based compensation expense(c)




—





—




$
48




$
8,049




$
10,207Capital expenditures



$
6,840




$
11,063




$
12,275




$
13,183




$
14,869Cash dividends per common share (paid)



$
0.26




$
0.41




$
0.63




$
1.06




$
1.31Average enrollment(d)




16,849





20,340





23,903





27,554





32,087Campuses(e)




25





30





35





43





51


At December 31,2003


2004


2005


2006


2007(in thousands)Balance Sheet Data:Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities



$
108,040




$
122,757




$
119,806




$
128,426




$
171,335Working capital(f)




94,760





112,726





110,886





122,204





131,734Total assets




182,556





210,114





225,845





270,844





343,778Long-term liabilities




2,894





5,784





6,569





7,689





10,922Total liabilities




53,892





61,192





74,005





99,317





155,271Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock(a)




95,686





—





—





—





—Total stockholders’ equity




32,978





148,922





151,840





171,527





188,507


|
|
|
|

|(a) | In 2001, the Company issued Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in conjunction with the Company’s recapitalization. As of July 2004, all outstanding and accrued shares of the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock had been converted into shares of common stock.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

33

---



|(b) | Diluted weighted average shares outstanding include common shares issued and outstanding, the assumed conversion of Series A Preferred Stock issued in May 2001, accrued payment-in-kind dividends on and assumed conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the dilutive impact of restricted stock and outstanding stock options using the Treasury Stock Method.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | In 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R),Share-based Payment, and began recording expense for all forms of stock-based compensation. Prior to 2006, only stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock grants was being recorded.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Reflects average student enrollment for the four academic terms for each year indicated.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(e) | Reflects number of campuses offering classes during the fourth quarter of each year indicated.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(f) | Working capital is calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with ‘‘Selected Historical Financial and Other Information,’’ our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, the ‘‘Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,’’ Item 1A entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and the other information appearing elsewhere, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Background and Overview

We are an education services holding company that owns Strayer University, Inc. The University is an institution of higher education which offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs at 55 campuses (including two new campuses opened for the 2008 winter term enrollment and two new campuses opened for the 2008 spring term enrollment) in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and worldwide via the Internet. The Company is planning to open a total of nine new campuses in 2008, including four that have already been opened.

We also own Education Loan Processing, Inc. (‘‘ELP’’), which was organized to administer the Company’s student loan portfolio. In 2003, the Company sold its loan portfolio to a financial institution. Until mid-2005, ELP continued to originate loans for immediate sale and administered them. Since then, ELP has administered existing loans and has helped students obtain new loans directly from third party lenders without the Company’s origination. The Company plans to close ELP in 2008.

As set forth below, average enrollment, full-time tuition rates, revenues, income from operations, net income, and diluted net income per share have all increased in each of the last three years.

Year Ended December 31,2005


2006(a)


2007(a)Average enrollment




23,903





27,554





32,087% Change from prior year




18
%




15
%




16
%Full-time tuition (per course)



$
1,152




$
1,215




$
1,280% Change from prior year




5
%




5
%




5
%Revenues (in thousands)



$
220,507




$
263,648




$
318,012% Change from prior year




20
%




20
%




21
%Income from operations (in thousands)



$
74,864




$
79,536




$
97,557% Change from prior year




14
%




6
%




23
%Net income (in thousands)



$
48,065




$
52,307




$
64,937% Change from prior year




17
%




9
%




24
%Diluted net income per share



$
3.26




$
3.61




$
4.47% Change from prior year




19
%




11
%




24
%


|
|
|
|

|(a) | In 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) related to stock-based compensation and began recording stock-based compensation expense for all forms of stock-based compensation.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

34

---



Strayer University derives approximately 97% of its revenue from tuition collected from its students. The academic year of the University is divided into four quarters, which approximately coincide with the four quarters of the calendar year. Students make payment arrangements for the tuition for each course prior to the beginning of the quarter. When students register for courses, tuition is recorded as unearned tuition, and is recognized in the quarter of instruction. If a student withdraws from a course prior to completion, the University refunds a portion of the tuition depending on when the withdrawal occurs. Tuition revenue is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals, corporate discounts, employee tuition discounts and scholarships. The University also derives revenue from other sources such as textbook-related income, application fees, commencement fees, placement test fees, withdrawal fees, loan administration fees, and other income, which are all recognized when incurred.

At the time of registration, unearned tuition (a liability) is recorded for academic services to be provided and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid upfront in cash. Because the University’s academic quarters coincide with the calendar quarters, tuition receivable at the end of any calendar quarter largely represents student tuition due for the following academic quarter. Based upon past experience and judgment, the University establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable not included in unearned tuition. Any uncollected account more than six months past due for students who have left the University is charged against the allowance. Our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 was 2.5%, 2.9%, and 3.3%, respectively.

Strayer University’s expenses consist of instruction and educational support expenses, selling and promotion expenses, and general and administration expenses. Instruction and educational support expenses generally contain items of expense directly attributable to the educational activity of the University. This expense category includes salaries and benefits of faculty and academic administrators and, beginning in 2006, stock-based compensation expense. Instruction and educational support expenses also include costs of educational supplies and facilities, including rent for campus facilities, certain costs of establishing and maintaining computer laboratories and all other physical plant and occupancy costs, with the exception of costs attributable to the corporate offices.

Selling and promotion expenses include salaries, benefits and, beginning in 2006, stock-based compensation expense of personnel engaged in recruitment, admissions, retention, promotion and development, as well as costs of advertising and production of marketing materials.

General and administration expenses include salaries, benefits and, beginning in 2006, stock-based compensation expense of management and employees engaged in student services, accounting, human resources, compliance and other corporate functions, along with the occupancy costs attributable to such functions. Bad debt expense is also included as a general and administration expense.

Investment and other income consists primarily of earnings and realized gains or losses on investments.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments related to its allowance for uncollectible accounts, income tax provisions, valuation of deferred tax assets, forfeiture rates for stock-based compensation plans and accrued expenses. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

35

---



Management believes that the following critical accounting policies are its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Tuition revenue is deferred at the time of registration and is recognized as income, net of any refunds or withdrawals, in the respective quarter of instruction. Advance registrations for the next quarter are recorded as unearned tuition. We record estimates for our allowance for uncollectible accounts for tuition receivable from students. If the financial condition of our students were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make required payments for tuition payable to us, additional allowances may be required. We record estimates for our accrued expenses and income tax liabilities. We periodically review our assumed forfeiture rates for stock-based awards and adjust them as necessary. Should actual results differ from our estimates, revisions to our accrued expenses, stock-based compensation expense, and income tax liabilities may be required.

New Campuses

The Company’s goal is to serve the demand for post secondary adult education nationwide by opening new campuses every year. A new campus typically requires up to $1 million in upfront capital costs for leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment. In the first year of operation, assuming a midyear opening, the Company expects to incur operating losses of approximately $1 million including depreciation related to the upfront capital costs. A new campus is typically expected to begin generating operating income on a quarterly basis in four to six quarters of operation, which is generally upon reaching an enrollment level of about 300 students. The Company’s new campus notional model assumes an increase of average enrollment by 100-150 students per year until reaching a level of about 1,000 students. Given the potential internal rate of return achieved with each new campus (an estimated 70%), opening new campuses is an important part of the Company’s strategy. The Company believes it has sufficient capital resources from cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated from operating activities to continue to open new campuses for at least the next 12 months.

The Company plans to open nine new campuses in 2008 including four already opened. The Company opened eight new campuses in 2006 and eight in 2007. The Company opened five new campuses in each of the preceding three years. See ‘‘New Campuses Opened’’ table in Item 1 for information regarding the locations of these new campuses.

Results of Operations

In 2007, the Company generated $318.0 million in revenue, a 21% increase compared to 2006, primarily as a result of average enrollment growth of 16% and a 5% tuition increase which commenced in January 2007. Income from operations was $97.6 million in 2007, an increase of 23% compared to 2006. Net income in 2007 was $64.9 million, an increase of 24% compared to 2006. Earnings per diluted share was $4.47 in 2007 compared to $3.61 in 2006, an increase of 24%.

36

---



The following table sets forth certain income statement data as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31,2005


2006


2007Revenues




100.0
%




100.0
%




100.0
%Costs and expenses:Instruction and educational support




34.9





34.6





34.2Selling and promotion




18.6





19.8





19.1General and administration




12.5





15.4





16.0Income from operations




34.0





30.2





30.7Investment and other income




1.3





1.7





2.0Income before income taxes




35.3





31.9





32.7Provision for income taxes




13.5





12.1





12.3Net income




21.8
%




19.8
%




20.4
%Tax rate




38.3
%




37.8
%




37.6
%


Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2006

Enrollment.Average enrollment increased 16% from 27,554 students for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 32,087 students for the same period in 2007. This growth is principally due to new campus openings, stable growth in our mature markets and the rapid growth in markets outside of commuting distance to a Strayer University physical campus through the University’s online programs.

Revenues.Revenues increased 21% from $263.6 million in 2006 to $318.0 million in 2007 principally due to a 16% increase in the average enrollment and a 5% tuition increase which commenced in January 2007.

Instruction and educational support expenses.Instruction and educational support expenses increased $17.8 million, or 19%, from $91.1 million in 2006 to $108.9 million in 2007. This increase was principally due to direct costs necessary to support the increase in student enrollments including faculty compensation, related academic staff salaries, and campus facility costs which increased $6.0 million, $4.7 million, and $3.7 million, respectively. These costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 34.2% in 2007 from 34.6% in 2006.

Selling and promotion expenses.Selling and promotion expenses increased $8.5 million, or 16%, from $52.3 million in 2006 to $60.8 million in 2007. This increase was principally due to the increased cost of advertising in new markets and the addition of admissions personnel, particularly at new campuses and for online programs, which increased $5.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased from 19.8% in 2006 to 19.1% in 2007 largely attributable to both marketing costs and staffing costs growing slower than tuition revenue, as the Company maintained the same number of new campuses openings (eight in both years).

General and administration expenses.General and administration expenses increased $10.1 million, or 25%, from $40.7 million in 2006 to $50.8 million in 2007. The increase is largely attributable to increased employee compensation and related expenses at both corporate and campus locations, higher bad debt expense, and higher stock-based compensation expense, which increased by $3.5 million, $2.9 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. General and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 16.0% in 2007 from 15.4% in 2006 primarily due to the aforementioned factors.

Income from operations.Income from operations increased $18.1 million, or 23%, from $79.5 million in 2006 to $97.6 million in 2007 due to the aforementioned factors.

37

---



Investment and other income.Investment and other income increased $2.0 million, or 43%, from $4.5 million in 2006 to $6.5 million in 2007. This increase was principally due to higher yields from the Company’s investments in a short-term tax-exempt bond fund and tax-exempt money market funds, and a higher average cash balance.

Provision for income taxes.Income tax expense increased $7.3 million, or 23%, from $31.8 million in 2006 to $39.1 million in 2007 primarily due to the increase in income before taxes attributable to the factors discussed above. This was partly offset by a lower effective tax rate of 37.6% in 2007, compared to 37.8% in 2006, resulting primarily from higher income from tax-exempt securities.

Net income.Net income increased $12.6 million, or 24%, from $52.3 million in 2006 to $64.9 million in 2007 because of the factors discussed above.

Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2005

Enrollment.Average enrollment increased 15% from 23,903 students for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 27,554 students for the same period in 2006. This growth is principally due to new campus openings, stable growth in our mature markets and the rapid growth in markets outside of commuting distance to a Strayer University physical campus served by Strayer University Online.

Revenues.Revenues increased 20% from $220.5 million in 2005 to $263.6 million in 2006 principally due to a 15% increase in the average enrollment and a 5% tuition increase which commenced in January 2006.

Instruction and educational support expenses.Instruction and educational support expenses increased $14.1 million, or 18%, from $77.0 million in 2005 to $91.1 million in 2006. This increase was principally due to direct costs necessary to support the increase in student enrollments including faculty compensation, related academic staff salaries, and campus facility costs which increased $4.7 million, $3.0 million, and $2.9 million, respectively. The increase is also partly attributable to $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expense which the Company began recording in 2006. These costs as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly to 34.6% in 2006 from 34.9% in 2005.

Selling and promotion expenses.Selling and promotion expenses increased $11.2 million, or 27%, from $41.1 million in 2005 to $52.3 million in 2006. This increase was principally due to the direct costs required to generate leads for enrollment growth, the addition of admissions personnel, particularly at new campuses and for online programs, the increase in the number of new campuses opened in 2006 compared to 2005 (eight, up from five in 2005) and stock-based compensation expense. These expenses as a percentage of revenues increased from 18.6% in 2005 to 19.8% in 2006 largely attributable to both marketing costs and staffing costs growing faster than tuition revenue, as the Company increased the number of new campuses opened.

General and administration expenses.General and administration expenses increased $13.1 million, or 48%, from $27.6 million in 2005 to $40.7 million in 2006. The increase is largely attributable to $6.9 million of stock-based compensation expense which the Company began recording in 2006. This increase was also due to increased employee compensation and related expenses at both corporate and campus locations and higher bad debt expense, each increasing by $2.2 million. General and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 15.4% in 2006 from 12.5% in 2005 primarily due to the inclusion of stock-based compensation.

Income from operations.Income from operations increased $4.6 million, or 6%, from $74.9 million in 2005 to $79.5 million in 2006 due to the aforementioned factors.

Investment and other income.Investment and other income increased $1.5 million, or 52%, from $3.0 million in 2005 to $4.5 million in 2006. This increase was principally due to higher yields from the Company’s investments in a short-term tax-exempt bond fund and tax-exempt money market funds. In addition, a higher average cash balance in 2006 partly contributed to this increase.

38

---



Provision for income taxes.Income tax expense increased $2.0 million, or 7%, from $29.8 million in 2005 to $31.8 million in 2006 primarily due to the increase in income before taxes attributable to the factors discussed above. This was partly offset by a lower effective tax rate of 37.8% in 2006, compared to 38.3% in 2005, resulting primarily from higher income from tax-exempt securities.

Net income.Net income increased $4.2 million, or 9%, from $48.1 million in 2005 to $52.3 million in 2006 because of the factors discussed above.

Seasonality

Our quarterly results of operations tend to vary significantly within a year because of student enrollment patterns. Enrollment generally is highest in the fourth quarter, or fall term, and lowest in the third quarter, or summer term. In 2007, enrollments by term were as follows:

2007 Enrollment by Term

Term


EnrollmentWinter




32,150Spring




31,656Summer




28,461Fall




36,082Average




32,087


The following table sets forth our revenues on a quarterly basis for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:

Quarterly Revenues
(dollars in thousands)

2005


2006


2007Three Months Ended


Amount


Percent


Amount


Percent


Amount


PercentMarch 31



$
56,153





26
%



$
67,090





25
%



$
80,193





25
%June 30




55,249





25





65,558





25





78,875





25September 30




47,087





21





56,693





22





69,813





22December 31




62,018





28





74,307





28





89,131





28Total for Year



$
220,507





100
%



$
263,648





100
%



$
318,012





100
%


Costs generally are not affected by the seasonal factors as much as enrollment and revenue, and do not vary significantly on a quarterly basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2007, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $171.3 million compared to $128.4 million at December 31, 2006. Most of the Company’s excess cash is invested in tax-exempt money market funds and a diversified, short-term, investment grade, tax-exempt bond fund to minimize the Company’s principal risk and to benefit from the tax efficiency of the funds’ underlying securities. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a total of $76.3 million invested in the short-term, tax-exempt bond fund. At December 31, 2007, the 452 issues in this fund had an average credit rating of AA+, an average maturity of 1.2 years, an average duration of 1.3 years, and an average yield to maturity of 3.3%. We had no debt as of December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company generated $80.8 million net cash from operating activities compared to $61.8 million for the same period in 2006. Capital expenditures were $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $13.2 million for the same period in 2006. Capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2008 are expected to be in the range of

39

---



$18.0 – $20.0 million inclusive of the expected openings of nine new campuses. The Company generated $5.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of its Loudoun, Virginia campus building in June 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company paid $19.0 million in cash dividends to our common stockholders and received $15.2 million upon the exercise of stock options. The Company also spent $38.1 million repurchasing common shares in the open market.

Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company increased its annual common stock cash dividend from $1.25 to $1.50 per share, or from $0.3125 to $0.375 per share quarterly. The Company also declared in the fourth quarter of 2007 a special common stock cash dividend of $2.00 per share, which was paid on January 16, 2008 to all shareholders of record as of January 2, 2008.

In 2007, bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue was 3.3% compared to 2.9% for the same period in 2006. Days sales outstanding, adjusted to exclude tuition receivable related to future quarters, was 12 days at the end of the fourth quarter 2007 compared to 13 days in 2006.

Currently, the Company invests its cash in bank overnight deposits, money market funds and a short-term tax-exempt bond fund. In addition, the Company has available two $10.0 million credit facilities from two banks. There have been no borrowings by the Company under these credit facilities. The Company believes that existing cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, cash generated from operating activities, and if necessary, cash borrowed under the credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s requirements for at least the next 12 months.

The table below sets forth the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:

Cash and Marketable Securities
(in millions)

At December 31,2005


2006


2007Cash and cash equivalents



$
74.2




$
52.7




$
95.0Marketable securities (short-term bond fund)




45.6





75.7





76.3Total



$
119.8




$
128.4




$
171.3


Year Ended December 31,2005


2006


2007Investment and other income



$
3.0




$
4.5




$
6.5


The table below sets forth our contractual commitments associated with operating leases as of December 31, 2007:

Payments Due By Period (in thousands)Total


Less than
1 Year


1-3 Years


3-5 Years


More than
5 YearsOperating leases



$
123,758




$
17,492




$
36,916




$
30,437




$
38,913


Impact of Inflation

Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company’s historical operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.

40

---



Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is subject to the impact of interest rate changes and may be subject to changes in the market values of its current and future investments. The Company invests its excess cash in bank overnight deposits, money market funds and a short-term tax-exempt bond fund. The Company has not used derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio.

Earnings from investments in bank overnight deposits, money market mutual funds and short-term tax-exempt bond funds may be adversely affected in the future should interest rates change. The Company’s future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or the Company may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2007, a 10% increase or decline in interest rates will not have a material impact on the Company’s future earnings, fair values or cash flows related to investments in cash equivalents or interest earning marketable securities.

41

---



Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PageStrayer Education, Inc.Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




43Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007




44Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007




45Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007




45Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007




46Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007




47Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




48Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts




62


All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

42

---



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Board of Directors and Stockholders
Strayer Education, Inc.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Strayer Education, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits (which were integrated audits in 2007 and 2006). We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for share-based compensation in 2006.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 14, 2008

43

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

December 31,ASSETS


2006


2007Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents



$
52,663




$
95,036Marketable securities available for sale, at fair value




75,763





76,299Tuition receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,029 and $3,206 in 2006 and 2007, respectively




80,753





100,651Other current assets




4,653





4,097Total current assets




213,832





276,083Property and equipment, net




52,748





57,946Deferred income taxes




3,400





8,830Restricted cash




500





500Other assets




364





419Total assets



$
270,844




$
343,778LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable



$
10,923




$
15,682Accrued expenses




1,830





3,303Income taxes payable




4,979





4,754Dividends payable




—





28,853Unearned tuition




73,896





91,476Other current liabilities




—





281Total current liabilities




91,628





144,349Long-term liabilities




7,689





10,922Total liabilities




99,317





155,271Commitments and contingenciesStockholders’ equity:Common stock, par value $.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
14,293,584 and 14,426,634 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively




141





144Additional paid-in capital




87,487





87,080Retained earnings




84,043





101,102Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income




(144
)




181Total stockholders’ equity




171,527





188,507Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity



$
270,844




$
343,778


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)

For the Year Ended
December 31,2005


2006


2007Revenues



$
220,507




$
263,648




$
318,012Costs and expenses:Instruction and educational support




76,977





91,120





108,852Selling and promotion




41,090





52,269





60,760General and administration




27,576





40,723





50,843Income from operations




74,864





79,536





97,557Investment and other income




2,982





4,542





6,495Income before income taxes




77,846





84,078





104,052Provision for income taxes




29,781





31,771





39,115Net income



$
48,065




$
52,307




$
64,937Net income per share:Basic



$
3.32




$
3.69




$
4.56Diluted



$
3.26




$
3.61




$
4.47Weighted average shares outstanding:Basic




14,472





14,187





14,248Diluted




14,741





14,492





14,517


STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

For the Year Ended
December 31,2005


2006


2007Net income



$
48,065




$
52,307




$
64,937Other comprehensive income:Unrealized (losses) gains on investments, net of taxes




(95
)




102





325Comprehensive income



$
47,970




$
52,409




$
65,262


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)

Common Stock


Additional
Paid-in
Capital


Retained
Earnings


Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income


TotalShares


Par ValueBalance, December 31, 2004




14,669,487




$
147




$
140,943




$
7,983




$
(151
)



$
148,922Exercise of stock options




28,333





—





1,336





—





—





1,336Tax benefit from exercise of stock options




—





—





560





—





—





560Repurchase of common stock




(410,071
)




(4
)




(37,964
)




—





—





(37,968
)Restricted stock grant




4,500





—





—





—





—





—Stock-based compensation




—





—





48





—





—





48Common stock dividends




—





—





—





(9,028
)




—





(9,028
)Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of income tax




—





—





—





—





(95
)




(95
)Net income




—





—





—





48,065





—





48,065Balance, December 31, 2005




14,292,249




$
143




$
104,923




$
47,020




$
(246
)



$
151,840Exercise of stock options




149,334





1





6,594





—





—





6,595Tax benefit from exercise of stock options




—





—





3,595





—





—





3,595Repurchase of common stock




(349,066
)




(3
)




(35,038
)




—





—





(35,041
)Restricted stock grant




201,067





—





—





—





—





—Stock-based compensation




—





—





7,413





—





—





7,413Common stock dividends




—





—





—





(15,284
)




—





(15,284
)Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of income tax




—





—





—





—





102





102Net income




—





—





—





52,307





—





52,307Balance, December 31, 2006




14,293,584




$
141




$
87,487




$
84,043




$
(144
)



$
171,527Exercise of stock options




372,250





4





15,174





—





—





15,178Tax benefit from exercise of stock options




—





—





12,678





—





—





12,678Repurchase of common stock




(260,818
)




(3
)




(38,091
)




—





—





(38,094
)Restricted stock grant




21,618





2





(2
)




—





—





—Stock-based compensation




—





—





9,834





—





—





9,834Common stock dividends




—





—





—





(47,878
)




—





(47,878
)Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of income tax




—





—





—





—





325





325Net income




—





—





—





64,937





—





64,937Balance, December 31, 2007




14,426,634




$
144




$
87,080




$
101,102




$
181




$
188,507


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

46

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31,2005


2006


2007Cash flows from operating activities:Net income



$
48,065




$
52,307




$
64,937Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Loss on disposal of assets




37





—





51Amortization of gain on sale




—





—





(148
)Amortization of deferred rent




230





190





(115
)Depreciation and amortization




6,619





7,059





8,523Provision for student loan losses




(162
)




(120
)




—Deferred income taxes




(63
)




(4,034
)




(5,700
)Stock-based compensation




48





7,413





9,834Changes in assets and liabilities:Tuition receivable, net




(14,266
)




(24,818
)




(19,898
)Other current assets




630





(1,710
)




617Other assets




4





(25
)




(55
)Accounts payable




1,503





4,581





2,911Accrued expenses




(835
)




347





1,473Income taxes payable




(2,804
)




4,801





12,453Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements




—





(3,595
)




(12,678
)Unearned tuition




13,719





18,118





17,580Deferred lease incentives




2,342





1,235





968Student loans originated or acquired




(686
)




(3
)




—Collections on student loans receivable




762





23





—Net cash provided by operating activities




55,143





61,769





80,753Cash flows from investing activities:Purchases of property and equipment




(12,275
)




(13,183
)




(14,869
)Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment




—





—





5,754Purchases of marketable securities




(20,000
)




(30,000
)




—Net cash used in investing activities




(32,275
)




(43,183
)




(9,115
)Cash flows from financing activities:Common dividends paid




(9,028
)




(15,284
)




(19,027
)Proceeds from exercise of stock options




1,336





6,595





15,178Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements




—





3,595





12,678Repurchase of common stock




(37,968
)




(35,041
)




(38,094
)Net cash used in financing activities




(45,660
)




(40,135
)




(29,265
)Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents




(22,792
)




(21,549
)




42,373Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year




97,004





74,212





52,663Cash and cash equivalents – end of year



$
74,212




$
52,663




$
95,036Non-cash transactions:Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable



$
561




$
501




$
2,349


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

47

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    Nature of Operations

Strayer Education, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), a Maryland corporation, conducts its operations through its subsidiaries, Strayer University, Inc. (the ‘‘University’’) and Education Loan Processing, Inc. (‘‘ELP’’). The University is an accredited institution of higher education that provides undergraduate and graduate degrees in various fields of study through 55 campuses (including two campuses opened for the 2008 winter term and two opened for the 2008 spring term) in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., and worldwide via the Internet. With the Company’s focus on the customer, regardless of whether he or she chooses to take classes at a physical campus or online, we have only one reporting segment.

2.    Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, the University, ELP, and Professional Education, Inc. (which is currently inactive). All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash invested in bank overnight deposits and money market mutual funds. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high quality credit institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities

Most of the Company’s excess cash is invested in tax-exempt money market funds and a diversified, short-term, investment grade, tax-exempt bond fund to minimize the Company’s principal risk and to benefit from the tax efficiency of the funds’ underlying securities. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a total of $76.3 million invested in the short-term tax-exempt bond fund. The investments are considered ‘‘available-for-sale’’ as they are not held for trading and will not be held to maturity, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The Company records the net unrealized gains and losses for changes in fair value as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable securities are based on the specific identification method.

Revenues

The Company’s educational programs are offered on a quarterly basis. Approximately 97% of the Company’s revenues during the year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of tuition revenue. Tuition revenue is recognized in the quarter of instruction. Tuition revenue is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals, corporate discounts, scholarships and employee tuition discounts. At the time of registration, a liability (unearned tuition) is recorded for academic services to be provided and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid upfront in cash. Revenues also include textbook-related income, application fees, commencement fees, placement test fees, withdrawal fees, loan administration fees and other income, which are all recognized when incurred.

48

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments in money market mutual funds and bank overnight deposits with high credit quality institutions. Cash and cash equivalent balances are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents. The Company has also invested its excess cash in a diversified, short-term, investment grade, tax-exempt bond fund that is classified under ‘‘Marketable Securities.’’

Tuition receivables are not collateralized; however, credit risk is minimized as a result of the diverse nature of the University’s student base. The University establishes an allowance for doubtful tuition accounts based upon historical trends and other information.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the carrying values of the Company’s assets are re-evaluated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an impairment loss has occurred based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, then a loss is recognized using a fair-value based model. Through 2007, no such impairment loss had occurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 40 years. Depreciation and amortization amounted to $6.6 million, $7.1 million and $8.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

Purchases of property and equipment and changes in accounts payable for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been adjusted to exclude non-cash purchases of property and equipment transactions during that period.

Income Taxes

The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on temporary differences between financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (‘‘FIN 48’’), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (‘‘SFAS 109’’), on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits was recognized. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at the adoption date of January 1, 2007 and at December 31, 2007 are immaterial. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2007, the amount of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions was immaterial. The tax years 2003-2007 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs in the quarter in which incurred, except for costs associated with the production of television commercials which are expensed when the commercial is first used.

Long-Term Liabilities

The Company has no debt; most of its long-term liabilities are for lease incentives related to the opening of new campuses, the straight-lining of rent expense, and a deferred gain related to the sale and lease back of a campus facility. In conjunction with the opening of some new campuses and other

49

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

facilities, the Company was reimbursed by the lessors for improvements made to those leased properties. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Bulletin No. 88-1, these reimbursements were capitalized as leasehold improvements and a long-term liability established. The leasehold improvements and the long-term liability are amortized on a straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which range from five to ten years. In accordance with the FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-3, ‘‘Accounting for Operating Leases with Schedule Rent Increases’’, the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the initial term of a lease. The difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent expense is recorded as a long-term liability. The Company also records the non-current portion of the gain related to the sale and lease back of a campus facility as a long-term liability. (See Note 7 below for more information.)

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),Share-based Payment(‘‘SFAS 123(R)’’), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(‘‘APB 25’’) for periods beginning January 1, 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (‘‘SAB 107’’) relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R).

The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method provided under the rule, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. In adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company used the long-form method of calculating the accumulated windfall tax benefit. The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method provided under the rule, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants is expensed over the vesting period using the straight-line method for Company employees and the graded-vesting method for members of the Board of Directors.

SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company has elected to estimate fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25 pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Accounting for Stock-based Compensation(‘‘FAS 123’’). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for stock options because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of FAS 123 and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amounts have

50

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.

The Company’s determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

No stock options were granted in 2006 or 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Black-Scholes option pricing model was used to estimate fair value as of the date of grant using the following assumptions:

For the year ended
December 31, 2005Dividend yield(1)


0.48%Expected volatility(2)


34%Risk-free interest rate(3)


3.9%Expected option term (in years)(4)


6.1Weighted average fair value of options granted


$39.61


|
|
|
|

|(1) | The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The Company analyzed historical volatility of the Company’s stock to estimate the expected volatility.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of the Company’s employee stock options.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | The expected option term was determined using the simplified method for estimating expected option life.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur assuming conversion or exercise of all dilutive unexercised stock options and restricted stock. The dilutive effect of stock options was determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service not yet recognized by the Company and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid in capital when the stock options become deductible for income tax purposes are assumed to be used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock options are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the stock option exercise price of an individual grant exceeds the average market price for the period. At December 31, 2007, the Company had no issued and outstanding stock options that were excluded from the calculation. A reconciliation of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands):

2005


2006


2007Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic earnings per share




14,472





14,187





14,248Incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options




269





282





168Unvested restricted stock




—





23





101Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share




14,741





14,492





14,517


51

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the period reported. The most significant management estimates included allowances for uncollectible accounts, accrued expenses, forfeiture rates for stock-based awards, and the provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains (losses) on investments in marketable securities, net of income taxes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (‘‘SFAS 157’’),Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Earlier adoption is permitted, provided that the company has not yet issued financial statements, including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157, but do not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158. ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans’’(‘‘SFAS 158’’), an amendment to FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other non-owner changes in equity. The standard also requires disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit costs of the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of gains or losses, prior services costs and transition asset or obligation. An employer with publicly traded equity securities is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations since it has no defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, ‘‘The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities’’ (‘‘SFAS 159’’). This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the statement but does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

52

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.    Investments – Marketable Securities

The cost and fair value for investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

2006


2007Cost



$
76,000




$
76,000Gross unrealized (loss) gain




(237
)




299Fair value



$
75,763




$
76,299


The Company has invested some of its excess cash in a diversified, no load, short-term, investment grade, tax-exempt bond fund. At December 31, 2007, the 452 issues in this fund had an average credit rating of AA+, an average maturity of 1.2 years, an average duration of 1.3 years, and an average yield to maturity of 3.3%.

4.    Property and Equipment

The composition of property and equipment as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands):

2006


2007


Estimated useful life
(years)Land



$
6,526




$
5,726



—Buildings and improvements




20,181





18,144



5-40Furniture and equipment




37,377





48,647



5-7Leasehold improvements




16,785





18,672



3-10Vehicles




22





—



5Construction in progress




807





2,786



—81,698





93,975Accumulated depreciation and amortization




(28,950
)




(36,029
)$
52,748




$
57,946


In 2006 and 2007, the Company recorded leasehold improvements of $1,235,000 and $968,000 respectively, which were reimbursed by lessors as lease incentives. In 2006 and 2007, the Company wrote-off $465,000 and $530,000, respectively, in fixed assets that were fully depreciated and no longer in service.

5.    Restricted Cash

In 2003, as part of commencing operations in Pennsylvania, the Company was required to maintain a ‘‘minimum protective endowment’’ of at least $500,000. These funds are required as long as the Company operates its campuses in the state. The Company accounts for these funds as a long-term asset.

6.    Stock Options and Restricted Stock

In July 1996, the Company’s stockholders approved 1,500,000 shares of common stock for grants under the Company’s 1996 Stock Option Plan (as amended, the ‘‘Plan’’). This Plan was amended by the stockholders at the May 2001 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting and at the May 2005 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 1,000,000 and 500,000, respectively. A total of 3,000,000 shares have therefore been approved for grant under the Plan. The Plan was again amended at the May 2006 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting to

53

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

authorize a one-time exchange of stock options for restricted stock by employees (excluding the five highest compensated executive officers) and to permit restricted stock and cash awards to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as incentive stock options, and also provides for the grant of non-qualifying options and restricted stock to employees, officers and directors of the Company. Options and restricted stock may be granted to eligible employees, officers or directors of the Company at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Vesting provisions are also at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Options may be granted at option prices based at or above the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. The maximum term of the options granted under the Plan is ten years.

In February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved cash payments to the holders of vested stock options in an amount equivalent to the Company’s common stock dividends. These cash payments are remitted on the same dates as the Company’s dividends and amounted to $0.6 million in 2006 and $0.4 million in 2007.

In February 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a grant of 20,016 shares of restricted stock to certain employees. These shares vest 100% on February 13, 2010. The Company’s stock price closed at $113.72 on the date of the restricted stock grant.

In May 2007, the Company awarded 3,742 shares of restricted stock to various non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors as part of its annual director compensation program. These shares vest over three years, with one-third of the stock vesting each year. The Company’s stock price closed at $128.67 on the date of this restricted stock grant.

In July 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a grant of 1,120 shares of restricted stock to certain employees. These shares vest 100% on July 23, 2010. The Company’s stock price closed at $138.49 on the date of the restricted stock grant.

Stock Options

All stock options granted after 2000 vest over three to four years with exercise prices ranging from $33.69 to $119.72. These options expire within six to eight years from date of grant and had a weighted-average contractual life of 2.6 years as of December 31, 2007.

54

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The table below sets forth the stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and other stock option information at December 31, 2007:

Number of
shares


Weighted-average
exercise price


Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life (yrs.)


Aggregate
intrinsic value(1)(in thousands)Balance, December 31, 2004




854,584




$
49.22





3.7




$
52,277Grants




277,083





103.04Exercises




(28,333
)




47.18Forfeitures




—





—Balance, December 31, 2005




1,103,334




$
62.79





3.6




$
38,620Grants




—





—Exercises




(149,334
)




44.17Forfeitures/Exchanges




(191,666
)




102.64Balance, December 31, 2006




762,334




$
56.42





2.6




$
37,338Grants




—





—Exercises




(372,250
)




40.77Forfeitures




—





—Balance, December 31, 2007




390,084




$
71.35





2.6




$
38,710Vested, December 31, 2007




229,667




$
45.71





1.0




$
28,680Exercisable, December 31, 2007




229,667




$
45.71





1.0




$
28,680


|
|
|
|

|(1) | The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on December 31 of each year and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31 of that year. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of our stock.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The number of shares exercisable as of December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 are as follows:

Number of shares


Weighted-average
exercise priceExercisable, December 31, 2005




621,247




$
40.86Exercisable, December 31, 2006




561,917




$
41.88Exercisable, December 31, 2007




229,667




$
45.71


The following table summarizes information regarding stock option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (in thousands):

For the year ended
December 31,2005


2006


2007Proceeds from stock options exercised



$
1,336




$
6,595




$
15,178Tax benefits related to stock options exercised



$
560




$
3,595




$
12,678Intrinsic value of stock options exercised(1)



$
1,434




$
9,225




$
32,588


|
|
|
|

|(1) | Intrinsic value of stock options exercised is estimated by taking the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the date of exercise and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options exercised for each option holder and then aggregated.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

55

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes information about the stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2007:

Options Outstanding


Options ExercisableRange of exercise prices


Number
outstanding
at 12/31/07


Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life (yrs.)


Weighted-
average
exercise price


Number
exercisable at
12/31/07


Weighted-
average
exercise price$33.69 – 67.84




229,667





0.8




$
45.71





229,667




$
45.71$107.28 – 107.28




150,417





5.1




$
107.28





—$119.72 – 119.72




10,000





4.4




$
119.72





—$33.69 – 119.72




390,084





2.6




$
71.35





229,667




$
45.71


Restricted Stock

The table below sets forth the restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:

Number of
shares


Weighted-average
grant priceBalance, December 31, 2004




—





—Grants




4,500




$
100.58Vested shares




—





—Forfeitures




—





—Balance, December 31, 2005




4,500




$
100.58Grants




208,567





102.01Vested shares




—





—Forfeitures




(7,500
)




91.27Balance, December 31, 2006




205,567




$
102.37Grants




24,878





117.09Vested shares




(1,543
)




103.60Forfeitures




(3,260
)




103.39Balance, December 31, 2007




225,642




$
103.97


Valuation and Expense Information Under SFAS 123(R) and Pro forma Information Under SFAS 123 for Periods Prior to January 1, 2006.

At December 31, 2007, total stock-based compensation cost which has not yet been recognized was $11.2 million, representing $9.4 million for unvested restricted stock and $1.8 million for unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over the next 31 months on a weighted-average basis.

56

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

For the year ended December 31, 2005, had compensation expense been determined based on the fair value of the options at grant dates computed in accordance with FAS 123, the pro forma amounts would be as follows (in thousands except per share data):

For the year ended
December 31, 2005(Pro forma)Net income



$
48,065Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax




3,383Pro forma net income



$
44,682Net income per share:As reported:Basic



$
3.32Diluted




3.26Pro formaBasic



$
3.09Diluted




3.02


The following table summarizes the pro forma stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options under FAS 123 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007. The table also includes the actual stock-based compensation expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2007 by expense line item (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31,2005
(Pro forma)


Actual
2006


Actual
2007Instruction and educational support



$
821




$
638




$
680Selling and promotion




547





545





634General and administration




4,106





6,866





8,893Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expense




5,474





8,049





10,207Tax benefit




2,091





2,992





3,879Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax



$
3,383




$
5,057




$
6,328


7.    Long-Term Liabilities

Lease Incentives

In conjunction with the opening of new campuses during 2006 and 2007, the Company recorded reimbursements by the lessors for improvements made to the leased properties in the amount of $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Bulletin No. 88-1, these reimbursements were capitalized as leasehold improvements and a long-term liability established. The leasehold improvements and the long-term liability will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which range from five to 10 years. At both December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had deferred lease incentives of $3.9 million.

Lease Obligations

In accordance with the FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-3, ‘‘Accounting for Operating Leases with Schedule Rent Increases,’’ the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the initial

57

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

term of a lease. The difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent expense is recorded as a long-term liability. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had lease obligations of $3.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

Deferred Gain

In conjunction with the sale and lease back of its Loudoun, Virginia campus building in June 2007, the Company realized a gain of $2.8 million before tax, which is deferred and recognized over the 10-year lease term. The non-current portion of this gain, which was $2.4 million at December 31, 2007, is recorded as a long-term liability.

8.    Sale of Campus Building

In June 2007, the Company sold its Loudoun, Virginia campus building for $5.8 million. The Company is leasing back most of the campus building over a 10-year period. The transaction resulted in a gain of $2.8 million before tax, which is to be recognized over the 10-year lease term.

9.    Other Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has a 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees of the Company. Participants may contribute up to $15,500 (effective January 1, 2007) of their base compensation annually. Employee contributions are voluntary. Discretionary contributions were made by the Company in 2005 and 2006, matching 100% of employee deferrals up to a maximum of 3% of the employee’s annual salary. Beginning in 2007, the Company matched an additional 50% of employee deferrals between 3% and 5% of annual salary. The Company’s contributions totaled $0.7 million, $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively.

In May 1998, the Company adopted the Strayer Education, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (‘‘ESPP’’). Under the ESPP, eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations, at 90% of its market value at the date of purchase. Purchases are limited to 10% of an employee’s eligible compensation. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be made available for purchase by participating employees under the ESPP is 2,500,000 shares. Shares purchased in the open market for employees for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 were as follows:

Shares purchased


Average price
per share2005




4,758




$
89.172006




4,767




$
91.332007


3,830



$
136.33


10.    Stock Repurchase Plan

As announced on November 3, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors initially authorized the Company to repurchase up to an aggregate of $15 million in value of common stock through December 31, 2004 in open market purchases from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s management depending on market conditions and other corporate considerations. The Company’s Board of Directors amended the program on various dates, increasing the repurchase amount authorized and extending the expiration date. At December 31, 2007, approximately $82 million of the Company’s share repurchase authorization was remaining for repurchases through December 31, 2008. All of the Company’s share repurchases were effected in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This stock repurchase plan may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time by the Company without notice.

58

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s stock repurchase activity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, all of which was part of a publicly announced plan, is set forth in the table below:

Number of shares
repurchased


Average price paid
per share


Amount available for
future repurchases
($mil.)2005




410,071




$
92.592006




349,066




$
100.392007




260,818




$
146.051,019,955




$
108.93




$
81.9


11.    Commitments and Contingencies

The University participates in various federal student financial assistance programs which are subject to audit. Management believes that the potential effects of audit adjustments, if any, for the periods currently under audit will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had 56 long-term operating leases for campuses and other administrative locations. Rent expense was $10,509,000, $12,828,000 and $15,327,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company had one lease with affiliates of the Company’s former CEO and majority stockholder. This lease expired in 2006; however, the Company’s former CEO and majority stockholder sold his interest in this building in February 2005. Rent paid to entities affiliated with the Company’s former CEO and majority stockholder was $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The rents on the Company’s leases are subject to annual increases. The minimum rental commitments for the Company as of December 31, 2007, are as follows (in thousands):

Minimum
rental
commitments2008



$
17,4922009




18,7122010




18,2042011




16,3452012




14,092Thereafter




38,913Total



$
123,758


In addition, the Company has available two $10 million credit facilities from two banks. Interest on any borrowings under either facility will accrue at an annual rate not to exceed 0.75% above the London Interbank Offered Rate. The Company does not pay any fees for these facilities. There have been no borrowings by the Company under these credit facilities. An unsecured letter of credit in the amount of $1.2 million, which expires in June 2008, was provided by Strayer University in favor of regulators in connection with their periodic approval activities.

12.    Dividends Payable

On October 30, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special common stock dividend of $2.00 per share, or $28.9 million, which was paid on January 16, 2008 to all shareholders of record on January 2, 2008.

59

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.    Income Taxes

The income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 is summarized below (in thousands):

2005


2006


2007Current:Federal



$
25,502




$
29,486




$
36,500State




5,421





6,319





8,159Total current




30,923





35,805





44,659Deferred:Federal




(798
)




(3,680
)




(4,935
)State




(344
)




(354
)




(609
)Total deferred




(1,142
)




(4,034
)




(5,544
)Total provision for income taxes



$
29,781




$
31,771




$
39,115


The tax effects of the principal temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 (in thousands):

2006


2007Tuition receivable and student loans



$
1,192





1,264Accrued vacation payable




151





241Deferred gain on sale of property




—





109Unrealized losses (gains) on marketable securities




93





(118
)Current net deferred tax asset




1,436





1,496Student loans




1





1Property and equipment




(1,012
)




(687
)Deferred leasing costs




1,503





1,816Stock-based compensation




2,908





6,762Deferred gain on sale of property




—





938Long-term net deferred tax asset




3,400





8,830Net deferred tax asset



$
4,836




$
10,326


A reconciliation between the Company’s statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 is as follows:

2005


2006


2007Statutory federal rate




35.0
%




35.0
%




35.0
%State income taxes, net of federal benefits




4.4
%




4.9
%




5.1
%Non-taxable interest income




(1.3
)%




(1.8
)%




(2.1
)%Other




0.2
%




(0.3
)%




(0.4
)%Effective tax rate




38.3
%




37.8
%




37.6
%


Cash payments for income taxes were $32.6 million in 2005, $31.0 million in 2006, and $32.4 million in 2007.

60

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

14.    Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Quarterly financial information for 2006 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):

QuarterFirst


Second


Third


Fourth2006Revenues



$
67,090




$
65,558




$
56,693




$
74,307Income from operations




24,986





21,473





8,998





24,079Net income




15,956





14,018





6,336





15,997Net income per share:Basic



$
1.12




$
0.99




$
0.45




$
1.13Diluted



$
1.10




$
0.97




$
0.44




$
1.11


QuarterFirst


Second


Third


Fourth2007Revenues



$
80,193




$
78,875




$
69,813




$
89,131Income from operations




28,947





26,351





13,058





29,201Net income




18,806





17,360





9,275





19,496Net income per share:Basic



$
1.33




$
1.22




$
0.65




$
1.37Diluted



$
1.30




$
1.20




$
0.64




$
1.34


61

---



STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(in thousands)

Description


Balance
beginning of
period


Additions
charged to
expense


Deductions


Balance
end of
period


Bad debt
expense as
a % of
revenueDeduction from asset account:Allowance for doubtful accounts:Year ended December 31, 2007



$
3,029




$
10,547




$
(10,370
)



$
3,206



3.3%Year ended December 31, 2006




1,927





7,776





(6,674
)




3,029



2.9%Year ended December 31, 2005




1,301





5,499





(4,873
)




1,927



2.5%


Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007. Based upon such review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company had in place, as of December 31, 2007, effective controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company (including consolidated subsidiaries) in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules thereunder, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2007 based on the framework inInternal

62

---



Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment under the framework inInternal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, and have concluded that there was no change during such quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

On, February 12, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and adopted minor, non-material amendments to the Company’s By-laws (the ‘‘By-Laws’’) to provide for registration and transfer of shares without the necessity of physical certificates (as required by NASDAQ rules), to clarify that the date for the annual meeting of shareholders shall be as determined by the Board of Directors, and to make certain other non-substantive changes intended to bring the By-Laws up to date. The amendments to the By-Laws of the Company are effective as of February 12, 2008. The summary of changes to the By-Laws set forth above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, a copy of which is attached to this report as Exhibit 3.02.

63

---



PART III

Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s directors and executive officers.

Name


Age


PositionDirectors:Robert S. Silberman




50



Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDr. Charlotte F. Beason




60



DirectorWilliam E. Brock




77



DirectorDavid A. Coulter




60



DirectorGary Gensler




50



DirectorRobert R. Grusky




50



DirectorRobert L. Johnson




61



DirectorTodd A. Milano




55



DirectorG. Thomas Waite, III




56



DirectorJ. David Wargo




54



DirectorExecutive Officers:Karl McDonnell




41



President and Chief Operating OfficerMark C. Brown




48



Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerLysa A. Hlavinka




40



Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative OfficerGregory Ferenbach




48



Senior Vice President and General CounselSonya G. Udler




40



Senior Vice President – Corporate CommunicationsKevin P. O’Reagan




48



Vice President and Chief Technology OfficerChristopher T. Slack




36



ControllerUniversity Officers:Dr. Sondra F. Stallard




58



University PresidentDr. Joel O. Nwagbaraocha




65



Provost and Chief Academic OfficerRandi Reich Cosentino




34



Senior Vice President – Academic Administration


Directors

Mr. Robert S. Silbermanhas been Chairman of the Board since February 2003 and Chief Executive Officer since March 2001. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Silberman served in a variety of senior management positions at CalEnergy Company, Inc., including as President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Silberman was Assistant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International Paper Company. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Silberman served in several senior positions in the U.S. Department of Defense, including as Assistant Secretary of the Army. Mr. Silberman has been a Director of Strayer since March 2001. He serves on the Board of Directors of Covanta Holding Company, NewPage Holding Corporation, and on the Management Advisory Board of New Mountain Capital, LLC. He also serves on the Board of Visitors of The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. Mr. Silberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Silberman holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Dartmouth College and a master’s degree in international policy from The Johns Hopkins University.

Dr. Charlotte F. Beasonis a former consultant in education and health care administration. From 1988 to 1996, she was Director of Health Professions Education Service and the Health Professional

64

---



Scholarship Program at the Department of Veterans Affairs. From 2000 to 2003, Dr. Beason was Chair and Vice Chair of the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (an autonomous agency accrediting baccalaureate and graduate programs in nursing); she is an evaluator for the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. Dr. Beason has served on the Board since 1996 and is a member of the Nominating/Governance Committee of the Board. She is also Chairwoman of the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Dr. Beason holds a bachelor’s degree in nursing from Berea College, a master’s degree in psychiatric nursing from Boston University and a doctorate in clinical psychology and public practice from Harvard University.

Mr. William E. Brockis the Founder and Chairman of the Brock Offices, a firm specializing in international trade, investment and human resources. From 1985 to 1987, Mr. Brock served in the President’s Cabinet as the U.S. Secretary of Labor, and from 1981 to 1985, as the U.S. Trade Representative. Elected Chairman of the Republican National Committee from 1977 to 1981, Mr. Brock previously served as a Member of Congress and, subsequently, as U.S. Senator for the State of Tennessee. Mr. Brock serves as a Counselor and Trustee of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and as a member of the Board of Directors of On Assignment, Inc., and Health Extras, Inc., and ResCare, Inc. Mr. Brock has been a member of the Board since 2001 and is Chair of the Nominating/Governance Committee of the Board. He holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from Washington and Lee University. Mr. Brock has also received a number of honorary degrees.

Mr. David A. Coulteris currently Managing Director and Senior Advisor at Warburg Pincus, LLC. He was Vice Chairman of J.P. Morgan & Chase Co. from December 2000 to December 2005. Mr. Coulter was Vice Chairman of The Chase Manhattan Corporation from July 2000 to December 2000. Prior to joining Chase, Mr. Coulter led the West Coast operations of the Beacon Group, a private investment and strategic advisory firm, and prior to that, Mr. Coulter served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the BankAmerica Corporation. Mr. Coulter is a member of the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation, The Irvine Company, Metavante Technologies, Inc., and Aeolus Re. Mr. Coulter is currently serving as the Presiding Independent Director of the Strayer Education, Inc. Board of Directors, on which he has served since 2002. Mr. Coulter holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and economics and a master’s degree in industrial administration, both from Carnegie Mellon University.

Mr. Gary Genslerserved as Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury from 1999 to 2001, and as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury from 1997 to 1999. From 1988 to 1997, Mr. Gensler was a partner of The Goldman Sachs Group, LP, where he served in various capacities including Co-head of Finance, responsible for controllers and treasury worldwide. He serves as a Trustee of the Bryn Mawr School and Enterprise Community Partners. Mr. Gensler also serves on the Board of The Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth as well as the Board of WageWorks, Inc., and the Washington Hospital Center. Mr. Gensler is currently serving as a Senior Advisor to Hillary Clinton for President. Mr. Gensler is on the Management Advisory Board of New Mountain Capital, LLC. He has served on the Board since 2001 and is Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Gensler holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Robert R. Gruskyis the Founder and Managing Member of Hope Capital Management, LLC, an investment manager, since 2000. He co-founded New Mountain Capital, LLC, a private equity firm, in 2000 and was a Principal and Member from 2000 to 2005, and has been a Senior Advisor since then. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Grusky served as President of RSL Investments Corporation. From 1985 to 1997, with the exception of 1990 to 1991 when he was on a leave of absence to serve as a White House Fellow and Assistant for Special Projects to the Secretary of Defense, Mr. Grusky served in a variety of capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co., first in its Mergers & Acquisitions Department and then in its Principal Investment Area. He is also on the Board of Directors of AutoNation, Inc., and National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., as well as a member of the Board of Trustees of Hackley School. Mr. Grusky has served on the Board since 2001, and is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. He holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Union College and an MBA from Harvard University.

65

---



Mr. Robert L. Johnsonis the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RLJ Companies, where he owns or holds interests in companies operating in the professional sports, hospitality, real estate, gaming, banking and financial services, and film production industries. Mr. Johnson is the founder of Black Entertainment Television (BET), a subsidiary of Viacom and the leading African-American operated media and entertainment company in the United States, and served as its Chief Executive Officer until January 2006. In 2002, Mr. Johnson became the first African-American majority owner of a major sports franchise, the Charlotte Bobcats of the NBA. From 1976 to 1979, he served as Vice President of Governmental Relations for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA). Mr. Johnson also served as Press Secretary for the Honorable Walter E. Fauntroy, Congressional Delegate from the District of Columbia. He also serves on the following boards: NBA Board of Governors, The Johns Hopkins University, Lowe’s Companies, IMG, Deutsch Bank Advisory Board, Wal-Mart Diversity Committee, and the Business Council. Mr. Johnson has served on the Board since 2003, and is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board. He holds a bachelor’s degree in social studies from the University of Illinois and a master’s degree in international affairs from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University.

Mr. Todd A. Milanohas been President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Pennsylvania College since 1989. Mr. Milano has served on the Board since 1996 and is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board and is also a member of the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Mr. Milano holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial management from Purdue University.

Mr. G. Thomas Waite, IIIhas been Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Humane Society of the United States since 1993. In 1992, Mr. Waite was the Director of Commercial Management of The National Housing Partnership. Mr. Waite has served on the Board since 1996, is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board and is a former member of the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Mr. Waite holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from the University of Virginia and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. J. David Wargohas been President of Wargo and Company, Inc., an investment management company, since 1993. Mr. Wargo is a co-founder and has been a Member of New Mountain Capital, LLC, since January 2000. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Wargo was a Managing Director and Senior Analyst of The Putnam Companies, a Boston-based investment management company. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Wargo was a partner and held other positions at Marble Arch Partners. Mr. Wargo is a Director of Liberty Global, Inc. and Discovery Holding Company. Mr. Wargo has served on the Board since 2001 and is Chair of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Wargo holds a bachelor’s degree in physics and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering, both from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also holds a master’s degree in management from the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Executive Officers

Mr. Karl McDonnelljoined Strayer Education in July 2006 as President and Chief Operating Officer. Previously, he served as Chief Operating Officer of InteliStaf Healthcare, Inc., one of the nation’s largest privately-held healthcare staffing firms, from 2003 to 2005. Prior to his tenure at InteliStaf, he served as Vice President of the Investment Banking Division at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. McDonnell has held senior management positions with several Fortune 100 companies, including The Walt Disney Company. Mr. McDonnell holds a bachelor’s degree in political science and American history from Virginia Wesleyan College and an MBA from Duke University.

Mr. Mark C. Brownis Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, having joined Strayer in 2001. Mr. Brown was previously the Chief Financial Officer of the Kantar Group, the information and consultancy division of WPP Group, a multi-national communications services company. Prior to that, for nearly 12 years, Mr. Brown held a variety of management positions at PepsiCo, Inc., including Director of Corporate Planning for Pepsi Bottling Group and Business Unit Chief Financial Officer for Pepsi-Cola International. Mr. Brown is a Certified Public Accountant who started his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Mr. Brown holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Duke University and an MBA from Harvard University.

66

---



Ms. Lysa A. Hlavinkais Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Ms. Hlavinka has been working in the for-profit education field for the past 17 years and joined Strayer in May 2001 as Vice President – Marketing. Ms. Hlavinka started her career as an account executive at an advertising agency and joined the University of Phoenix in 1990. As that company grew, Ms. Hlavinka held positions as Marketing Manager, Director of Administrative Services, and, most recently, National Director of Advertising. She has taught marketing and public relations classes both at the University of Phoenix and Strayer University. Ms. Hlavinka holds a bachelor’s degree in advertising from Arizona State University and an MBA from the University of Phoenix.

Mr. Gregory Ferenbachhas served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel for the Company since September 2006. Mr. Ferenbach joined Strayer in 2002 and was previously General Counsel of Strayer University, where he was responsible for obtaining regulatory approvals to begin operations in new states. Mr. Ferenbach has more than 20 years of experience in the practice of law. Prior to joining Strayer, Mr. Ferenbach was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and an attorney in corporate practice at the law firms of Piper & Marbury in Baltimore, Md., and Dow, Lohnes & Albertson in Washington, D.C. Mr. Ferenbach holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Yale University and a juris doctorate degree from the University of Virginia School of Law.

Ms. Sonya G. Udleris Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications. Ms. Udler joined Strayer in 2002, and brings more than 15 years of public relations and marketing communications experience to Strayer. For the two years prior to joining Strayer, she served as a public relations and media strategies consultant. She previously served as Senior Vice President at Young & Associates, Inc., a public relations agency, where she developed communications strategies and media programs for Bell Atlantic, Siemens, Verizon and other leading technology companies. Ms. Udler holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Maryland.

Mr. Kevin P. O’Reaganis Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. He has been active in the technology field for more than 20 years and joined Strayer in July 2001. Mr. O’Reagan started his career with Andersen Consulting and later joined Prudential Mortgage as the Director of Technology. Prior to joining Strayer, he held a number of IT management positions including Chief Technology Officer of the RIA Group of the Thompson Corporation. Prior to joining Strayer, Mr. O’Reagan developed and taught courses at the post-graduate level as an adjunct faculty member at The Johns Hopkins University in its Information Technology Program. Mr. O’Reagan holds a bachelor’s degree in information systems management from the University of Maryland and a master’s degree in technology from The Johns Hopkins University.

Mr. Christopher T. Slackjoined Strayer as Controller in August 2007. Prior to joining Strayer, Mr. Slack was the Corporate Controller of Learning Tree International, Inc., a professional training and education company. Prior to that, Mr. Slack was Assistant Controller of Manugistics Group, Inc. and Internal Audit Director of Primus Telecommunications, Inc. Additionally, Mr. Slack spent several years in public accounting with both Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Reznick Group. Mr. Slack is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration (accounting) and a master’s degree in professional accountancy, both from West Virginia University.

University Officers

Dr. Sondra F. Stallardis the University President and joined Strayer University in September 2007. For the previous 11 years, she was Dean of the School of Continuing and Professional Studies at the University of Virginia (UVA). Prior to that, she served in a series of leadership positions at UVA, including Director of Corporate and Foundation Relations at the business school, Director of Development for the school of engineering, and Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity Programs. Concurrently, she held faculty appointments throughout her 32-year career at UVA. Dr. Stallard holds a bachelor’s degree in history and government from West Virginia University Institute of Technology, a master’s degree in history from Morehead State University, and a Ph.D. in education from the University of Virginia.

Dr. Joel O. Nwagbaraochaserves as Interim University President, Provost, and Chief Academic Officer. Dr. Nwagbaraocha joined Strayer University in 1994 as Adjunct Faculty. He has since held

67

---



several positions at the University, including Campus Dean. Dr. Nwagbaraocha has more than 35 years of experience as an academician, education administrator and education consultant. Prior to joining Strayer, he was President of Barber-Scotia College in Concord, N.C. Dr. Nwagbaraocha advises graduate students at Strayer University’s Washington Campus on their Directed Research Projects and teaches education courses at the campus. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Norfolk State University and master’s and doctoral degrees in education planning and management from Harvard University.

Ms. Randi Reich Cosentinois Senior Vice President – Academic Administration. Ms. Cosentino has been with the University for six years and has served as Director of Online Operations, Director of Business Processes, Director of New Campus Openings, and as an Adjunct Faculty Member. Prior to joining Strayer in 2001, Ms. Cosentino co-founded and managed business and strategic development for Mascot Network, an application service provider serving the higher education market. Ms. Cosentino also served several years in city government with the City of New York as the Assistant Director in the Mayor’s Office of Transportation. Ms. Cosentino holds a bachelor’s degree in psychology and political science from the University of Pennsylvania and an MBA from Harvard University.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is composed of Gary Gensler, Robert R. Grusky and G. Thomas Waite, each of whom are independent as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(IV) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act.

The Board of Directors has determined that Gary Gensler qualifies as an ‘‘audit committee financial expert,’’ as defined by SEC regulations, based on his education, experience and background.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file reports of beneficial ownership of equity securities of the Company and to furnish copies of such reports to the Company. Based on a review of such reports, and upon written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, all such filing requirements were met.

Code of Ethics

The Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics in February 2004, meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable NASDAQ requirements. The Code of Conduct was amended on February 12, 2008 to provide updates and clarifications but was not amended in any material respects. The Company will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Ethics. Persons wishing to make such a request should contact Sonya G. Udler, Vice President of Corporate Communications, 1100 Wilson Blvd. Suite 2500, Arlington, VA 22209, (703) 247-2500. Copies are also available on our website, www.strayereducation.com in the Investor Relations section. In the event that we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and requires disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose such amendment or waiver and the reasons for the amendment or waiver on our website, located at www.strayereducation.com, and as required by NASDAQ, file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC reporting the amendment or waiver.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information to be contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2007.

68

---



Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the caption ‘‘Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock’’ in the Company’s Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2007.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the caption ‘‘Certain Transactions with Former Management’’ in the Company’s Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2007.

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Set forth below are the services rendered and related fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP for 2006 and 2007. All of such services have been pre-approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.

2006


2007Audit FeesRecurring:Consolidated financial statements audit



$
375,000




$
374,100Non recurring:Implementation of SFAS 123(R)




39,625





—Other




5,610





—420,235





374,100Tax FeesPreparation of corporate tax returns




33,000





48,450All Other FeesLicense fee for accounting database




1,500





2,400$
454,735




$
424,950


69

---



PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(A)(1) Financial Statements

All required financial statements of the registrant are set forth under Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K.

(A)(2) Financial Statement Schedule

The required financial statement schedule of the registrant is set forth under Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K.

(A)(3) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number


Description3.01


Amended Articles of Incorporation and Articles Supplementary of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).3.02*


Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.4.01


Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-3967) filed with the Commission on July 16, 1996).10.03


Employment Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2001, between Strayer Education, Inc. and Robert S. Silberman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Annual Report on From 10-K filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).10.04


1996 Amended Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 27, 2001 and Exhibits B & C to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 3, 2006).21.01


Subsidiaries of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.01 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).23.1*


Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.24.1*


Power of Attorney (included in signature page hereto).31.1*


Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.31.2*


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.32.1*


Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2*


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


|
|
|
|

|* | Filed herewith.
|- | ---------------

70

---



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.


By: /s/ Robert S. Silberman


Robert S. Silberman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer


Date:    February 14, 2008

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert S. Silberman, Gregory Ferenbach and Mark C. Brown, and each of them individually, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the report and any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

|                        |  |                                                                                 |  |                  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|SIGNATURES              |  | TITLE                                                                           |  | DATE             
|                       
|/s/ Robert S. Silberman |  | Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Robert S. Silberman)  
|                       
|/s/ Mark C. Brown       |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)            |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Mark C. Brown)        
|                       
|/s/ Charlotte F. Beason |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Charlotte F. Beason)  
|                       
|/s/ William E. Brock    |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(William E. Brock)     
|                       
|/s/ David A. Coulter    |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(David A. Coulter)     
|                       
|/s/ Gary Gensler        |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Gary Gensler)         
|                       
|/s/ Robert R. Grusky    |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Robert R. Grusky)     
|                       
|/s/ Robert L. Johnson   |  | Director                                                                        |  | February 14, 2008
|                       
|(Robert L. Johnson)    
|                       

71

---



|                         |  |          |  |                  
|------------------------ |  | -------- |  | -----------------
|SIGNATURES               |  | TITLE    |  | DATE             
|                        
|/s/ Todd A. Milano       |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                        
|(Todd A. Milano)        
|                        
|/s/ G. Thomas Waite, III |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                        
|(G. Thomas Waite, III)  
|                        
|/s/ J. David Wargo       |  | Director |  | February 14, 2008
|                        
|(J. David Wargo)        
|                        

72

---