alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-986-987 (Second Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on ferrovanadium from China and South Africa would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

                    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2013 (78 FR 65706) and determined on February 4, 2014 that it would conduct full reviews (79 FR 9000, February 14, 2014). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 10, 2014 (79 FR 39411). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on November 20, 2014, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.                

                    The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 28, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4517 (January 2015), entitled                     *Ferrovanadium from China and South Africa: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-986-987 (Second Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 28, 2015.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-02004 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# C_2005082EN.01000601.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/6

---

Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order brought on 28 January 2005 by Names b.v. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-2/05 SA)

(2005/C 82/12)

An application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 28 January 2005 by Names b.v., represented by R. Nathan, avocat.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor; |
| --- | --- |

—

lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
# Dam (No.) (402) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Dam (No.) (402) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Dam (No.) (402).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Dam (No.) (402) (10/2020) Standard Document(76.96 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Dam (No.) (402) Overview(109.33 KB)

Dam (No.) (402) CPPE(25.04 KB)

Dam (No.) (402) Network Diagram(89.39 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,921
<SECURITIES>                                     5,815
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,380
<PP&E>                                         221,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,068
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,022
<SALES>                                         10,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,765
<CGS>                                            5,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (857)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (295)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (2,048)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,610)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
EX-23.1

                          CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP


We have issued our report dated May 29, 2002, except for the second paragraph of
Note 12, under the subheading "SEC Investigation and Other", as to which the
date is June 13, 2002, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in the Annual Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Schick Technologies,
Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-46825, effective February 24, 1998, File No.
333-83488, effective February 27, 2002).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
May 29, 2002 except for the second paragraph of Note 12, under the subheading
"SEC Investigation and other," as to which the date is June 13, 2002.
# C_2005106EN.01000302.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 24 February 2005

in Case C-318/02: Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Decision 2002/524/EC - Financial adjustments to expenditure by the Netherlands in the form of exceptional support measures for the market in pigmeat in the Netherlands - Regulation (EC) No 413/97)

(2005/C 106/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-318/02 Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agent: H.G. Sevenster, S. Terstal and N.A.J. Bel) v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: T. van Rijn) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 C 305 of 07.04.2002.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the “Company”), for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tom S. Q. Yip, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Date:   March 13, 2013 | By:    | /s/   Tom S. Q. Yip                                                       |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Tom   S. Q. Yip                                                           |
|                        |   | Chief   Financial Officer    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      19,991,000
<SECURITIES>                                   623,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,710,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 78,829,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           102,153,000
<PP&E>                                       1,702,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 636,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,219,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       74,552,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,660,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,219,000
<SALES>                                     10,759,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,759,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,793,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,443,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,523,000  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   997,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,526,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JASON KOKINDA, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 140 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2015, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Application for Exercise of King’s Bench or 

Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the Application to Recuse, the Application to Waive Service 

Requirements, and the Application for Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
# C_2004300EN.01002201.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/22

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-339/03: Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/22/EC - Keeping of wild animals in zoos - Failure to transpose within the prescribed time-limit)

(2004/C 300/44)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-339/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Schieferer and M. van Beek) v the Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: M. Lumma) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of J. N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), Acting President of the Fourth Chamber, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič, Judges; Advocate General: P. Léger, Registrar: R. Grass, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, in the various länder, with the exception of Bremen, Hamburg, Hessen, Baden-Württemberg, Niedersachsen, Berlin, Schleswig-Holstein and Thuringen, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, in the various länder, with the exception of Bremen, Hamburg, Hessen, Baden-Württemberg, Niedersachsen, Berlin, Schleswig-Holstein and Thuringen, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9 of that directive.

| 2) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.9.2003.

1

---
# C_2005038EN.01000601.xml

| 15.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3611 — Borgwarner/BERU)

(2005/C 38/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3611. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3611. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2004229EN.01000101.xml

| 14.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 September 2004

(2004/C 229/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2236 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,437 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6801 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0915 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5417 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,66 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3495 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5773 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,649 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,22 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6613 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4276 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,398 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 100 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,91 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,075 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 839 000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7545 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5816 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5437 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8614 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0788 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0192 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2236

JPY

Japanese yen

134,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,437

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6801

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0915

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5417

ISK

Iceland króna

87,66

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3495

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5773

CZK

Czech koruna

31,649

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,22

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6613

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4276

PLN

Polish zloty

4,398

ROL

Romanian leu

41 100

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,91

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,075

TRL

Turkish lira

1 839 000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7545

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5816

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5437

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8614

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0788

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,08

ZAR

South African rand

8,0192

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004239EN.01001005.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/10

---

Removal from the register of Case C-76/04 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/22)

By order of 11 June 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-76/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---
August 2023

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Drainage Water Management (Code 554) 

Drainage water management is the process of managing

water discharges from surface or subsurface agricultural

drainage systems with water-control structures. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of regulating water in a drainage system is to

manage moisture by controlling the outflow of drainage

water. This practice applies to areas where drainage is

needed during certain periods and where it is

advantageous to limit the outflow at other times. Limiting the outflow raises the level of water in the

soil so the moisture can be utilized by crops or when wet conditions are needed to conserve organic

material (organic soils). This practice is especially applicable in highly permeable soils that have a low

available water capacity and in organic soils that tend to subside when soil-moisture conditions are

favorable for decomposition of organic material. 

Management is based upon the time and stage of water held in drains, pumping schedules, and

coordination of these items with rainfall, season, crop needs, and soil requirements. Infield water table

observation points may be used to determine the relationship of the control elevation settings relative

to critical field water table depths. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Drainage Water Management (Code 554) is commonly

applied with conservation practices such as CPSs Structure for Water Control (Code 587), Subsurface

Drain (Code 606), Surface Drain, Main or Lateral (Code 608), Pumping Plant (Code 533), Vertical

Drain (Code 630), Water and Sediment Control Basin (Code 638), Dike (Code 356), and Critical Area

Planting (Code 342). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50428) pertaining to the registration of $100.0
million of Onyx common stock, (b) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-72235) pertaining to the Onyx Software Corporation 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 1994 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan, and the 1998 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, (c)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55414) pertaining to the Onyx Software
2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock Compensation Plan, two Stock Option Agreements,
each dated January 5, 2001, between Onyx Software Corporation and Kevin Corcoran
and the Stock Option Agreement, dated January 30, 2001, between Onyx Software
Corporation and Leslie Rechan, and (d) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-63214) pertaining to the Onyx Software 2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock
Compensation Plan; of our report dated January 29, 2002, except for Note 18, as
to which the date is February 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Onyx Software Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 25, 2002