alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         901,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,795,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                   460,905
<INVENTORY>                                  4,869,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,384,281
<PP&E>                                      23,164,850
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,274,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,204,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,527,928
<BONDS>                                     18,224,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        383
<COMMON>                                         1,823
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,069,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,204,962
<SALES>                                     15,719,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,704,940
<CGS>                                       11,776,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,267,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,225,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             95,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        

</TABLE>
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1996-1
$ 227,697,670 6.60% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-98   5,524,159     648,779     435,542    4.60%    7,609,889    6.70%
 Feb-98   5,293,626     618,396     479,090    5.30%    6,855,456    6.32%
 Mar-98   5,081,738     589,281     392,204    4.55%    6,231,654    6.02%
 Apr-98   5,313,497     561,331     279,535    3.42%    6,027,169    6.14%
 May-98   4,997,367     532,107     240,701    3.10%    5,343,914    5.73%
 Jun-98   4,683,299     504,622     263,093    3.57%    5,356,302    6.05%
 Jul-98   4,743,082     478,863     190,034    2.72%    5,035,963    6.01%
 Aug-98   4,569,870     452,777     119,638    1.81%    4,953,203    6.26%
 Sep-98   3,950,749     427,642     184,194    2.94%    4,906,945    6.54%
 Oct-98   4,199,618     405,913     189,827    3.22%    4,420,124    6.25%
 Nov-98   4,030,350     382,815     169,787    3.06%    4,195,091    6.30%
 Dec-98   3,697,295     360,648     214,733    4.09%    4,107,975    6.53%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  56,084,649   5,963,175   3,158,377

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
**Exhibit
      13(a)**






**906
      Certification**




The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
      Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) for the
      purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
      Title 18 of the United States Code. This
      certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Exchange Act and does
      not constitute a part of the Report accompanying this
      letter.




Jason
      C.S.
      Chang, the Chief Executive Officer and Kenneth Hsiang, the Chief Financial
      Officer of ASE Test Limited, each certifies that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of ASE Test
      Limited.







Date:   
      June 25, 2007




By:
            /s/
                Jason C.S. ChangName:
            Jason
                C.S. ChangTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerBy:
            /s/
                Kenneth HsiangName:
            Kenneth
                HsiangTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50428) pertaining to the registration of $100.0
million of Onyx common stock, (b) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
72235) pertaining to the Onyx Software Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, the Amended and Restated 1994 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan, and the 1998 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, and (c)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55414) pertaining to the Onyx Software
2001 Nonofficer Employee Stock Compensation Plan, two Stock Option Agreements,
each dated January 5, 2001, between Onyx Software Corporation and Kevin
Corcoran and the Stock Option Agreement, dated January 30, 2001, between Onyx
Software Corporation and Leslie Rechan; of our report dated January 29, 2001,
except for paragraph 4 of Note 14, as to which the date is February 12, 2001,
with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Onyx Software
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 28, 2001
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2005031EN.01000203.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Grand Chamber and the Third and Sixth Chambers as from 19 October 2004

(2005/C 31/05)

At its meeting on 19 October 2004, the Court drew up the list, referred to in Article 11b(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Grand Chamber as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Gulmann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ó Caoimh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr La Pergola |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Levits |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Puissochet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Schintgen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Klučka |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Colneric |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Malenovský |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr von Bahr |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ilešič |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Cunha Rodrigues |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Borg Barthet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Ms Silva de Lapuerta |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Arestis |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lenaerts |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Juhász |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Schiemann |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Kūris |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Makarczyk |

At its meeting on 19 October 2004, the Court drew up the list, referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Third Chamber as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr La Pergola |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ó Caoimh |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Puissochet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr von Bahr |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Malenovský |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Borg Barthet |

At its meeting on 19 October 2004, the Court drew up the list, referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure, for the purposes of determining the composition of the Sixth Chamber as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr La Pergola |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Puissochet |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr von Bahr |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Malenovský |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Lõhmus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Mr Ó Caoimh |

---
Submitted on record and brief June 15,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration July 14, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. Horton, Claimant. EBI COMPANIES and West Beaverton Sanitary Services, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*James M. HORTON, *Respondent.*

(WCB No. 91-10143; CA A75395)

855 P2d 665

Thomas M. Sheridan and Davis & Bostwick, Portland, filed the brief for petitioners.

Donald Atchison and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
# C_2004314EN.01000601.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf by order of that court of 13 October 2004 in the case of Possehl Erzkontor GmbH against Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-445/04)

(2004/C 314/09)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Düsseldorf Finance Court) (Germany) of 13 October 2004, received at the Court Registry on 21 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Possehl Erzkontor GmbH against Hauptzollamt Duisburg on the following question:

Does fused magnesia of the kind described in detail in this order, which is caustic-burned from natural mined magnesite and obtained in a second processing stage by fusion in an electric arc furnace, come under subheading 2519 90 10 of Annex I to the Combined Nomenclature?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMETNS OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 000's
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          7,654
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,019
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,256
<PP&E>                                          9,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,253
<BONDS>                                           363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,253
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               42,644
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  23,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,553)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.36)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARIO BRANNON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 151 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-1491

IN RE: PAUL RAVIDA,

Debtor,

_____________________

FRIEDRICH LU,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PAUL RAVIDA,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges.

Friedrich Lu on brief pro se.

Mark N. Berman, Christopher R. Mirick, and Hutchins, Wheeler

& Dittmar on brief for appellee.
January 7, 2002

Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm. There was no

error in the dismissal pursuant to D. Mass. Loc. R. 203(A),

as that Rule clearly authorizes dismissal of an appeal in an

adversary proceeding where appellant has failed to comply

with the mandates of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006 and 8001(a). We

see no constitutional infirmity in the local rule, as any

dismissal under the rule is reviewable by an Article III

judge in the district court, and in this instance was first

directed by, and then affirmed by, a district judge. The

bankruptcy court was not without jurisdiction to enter the

order of dismissal, despite the fact that the case was on

appeal to this court at the time, since the appeal here was

an improper interlocutory one. See United States v. Brooks,

145 F.3d 446, 456 (1st Cir. 1998) (lower court “may proceed,

notwithstanding the filing of an appeal, if the notice of

appeal is defective in some substantial and easily

discernible way (if, for example, it is based on an

unappealable order) . . . .).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-105794 of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 19, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes 1) an explanatory paragraph referring to the
application of fresh-start accounting in accordance with AICPA Statement of
Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting for Entities in Reorganization Under the
Bankruptcy Code," and the lack of comparability of financial information between
reporting periods, and 2) an emphasis paragraph related to the change in the
Company's fiscal year end).







DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Houston, Texas
March 19, 2004


                                       75
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 3-22-12 Meeting with Industry Coalition and EPA on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On March 22, 2012, EPA met with various member s of an industry coa lition (including the forest product industries) to discuss their issues and concerns with the rulemakings on “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) Th at are Solid Waste,” (76 FR 15456 and 76 FR 80452).

During that meeting, industry members expresse d concerns with the NHSM Rulemaking. EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the informa tion presented, particularly for resinated wood, tire-derived fuel, Wastewater Treatment Residuals, Paper recy cling residuals/OCC rejects, Processed C&D, and Non-hazardous treated wood.

Agenda The Industry Coalition’s agenda is attached.

Meeting Attendees Members from Industry: Sarah Amick (RMA), Susan Bodine, Corey Brandt (RockTenn), Mike Curtis (GP) Tim Hunt (AF&PA/AWC) Gary Melow (BPA) Paul Noe, (AF&PA) Tracey Norberg (RMA) Jeff Shumaker (IP) Bill Turley (CRMA) Vipin Varma (NCASI) Steve Woock (Weyerhaeuser)EPA Invitees: Suzanne Rudzinski Jim Berlow Mimi Guernica

Staff: Alan Carpien Kenneth Dixon George Faison Mike Svizzero Tab Tesnau Marc ThomasIndustry Coalition meeting with EPA on NHSM March 22 from 1 to 2:30

Logistics:

o Location : ORCR, Two Potomac Yard (North Building); 2733 Crystal Drive; Arlington/Crystal Cit y, VA; Room 6100

o Attending: Tim Hunt (AF&PA/AWC), Paul Noe (AF&PA), Jeff Shumaker (IP), Mike Curtis (GP), Corey Brandt (RockT enn), Steve Woock (Weyerhaeuser), Rob Kaufmann (Koch), Vipin Varma (NCASI), Susan Bodine, Tracey Norberg (RMA), Sarah Amick (RMA), Bill Turley (CRMA), Gary Melow (BPA)

Draft Agenda Introductions Legal issues (5 minutes) Program Structure (35 minutes)

• Contained gas

• Contaminant comparisons

• Definitions

• Petition process

• Homogeneous material

• Comfort letters

Non-waste fuel listing (45 minutes)

• Resinated wood

• TDF

• Wastewater Treatment Residuals

• Paper recycling residuals/OCC rejects

• Processed C&D

• Non-hazardous treated wood

• Other materials

Wrap Up (5 minutes):

• Summarize key outstanding questions

• Other issues – rule schedule
# C_2004314EN.01001901.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 October 2004

in Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Open competition - Preselection tests - Neutralisation of a multiple-choice question - Principle of proportionality - Breach of the competition notice)

(2004/C 314/48)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-49/03: Gunda Schumann, residing in Berlin (Germany), represented by Y. Block, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in open competition COM/A/11/01 not to admit the applicant to the tests following the preselection tests, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcia-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 19 July 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 19 July 2002;

| 2. | Dismisses the application as unfounded in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 4 June 2002; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application as unfounded in that it seeks annulment of the decision of 4 June 2002;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ No C 101 of 26.4.2003.

---
CONFIDENTIAL	&	PROPRIETARY

INFORMATION

MUST	NOT	BE	SHARED	WITH	THE	PUBLIC
# C_2005056EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 March 2005

(2005/C 56/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3115 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68760 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5491 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,82 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5827 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,665 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 242,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4309 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9287 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 497 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,884 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6732 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6715 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6317 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2295 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8031 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1375 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8168 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3115

JPY

Japanese yen

138,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68760

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5491

ISK

Iceland króna

79,82

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5827

CZK

Czech koruna

29,665

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

242,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4309

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9287

ROL

Romanian leu

36 497

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,884

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6732

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6715

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6317

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2295

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8031

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1375

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,39

ZAR

South African rand

7,8168

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2269 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2269

  To require the Administrator of General Services to issue guidance 
         relating to the procurement of reclaimed refrigerants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2017

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Administrator of General Services to issue guidance 
         relating to the procurement of reclaimed refrigerants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Refrigerant Management and 
Stewardship Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PROMOTING USE OF RECLAIMED REFRIGERANTS IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall 
issue guidance relating to the procurement of reclaimed refrigerants to 
service existing equipment in public buildings.
    (b) Preference.--The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall 
give preference to the use of reclaimed refrigerants if--
            (1) the refrigerant has been reclaimed by an individual or 
        entity that is certified under the laboratory certification 
        program of the Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration 
        Institute; and
            (2) the price of the reclaimed refrigerant does not exceed 
        the price of a newly manufactured refrigerant.
                                 <all>
```