alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Water Management, Land Smoothing, Nutrient Management, Structure for Water Control, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Brussel by decision of that court of 29 July 2004 in the case of Lidl Belgium GmbH & Co KG against NV Etablissementen Franz Colruyt

(Case C-356/04)

(2004/C 273/23)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Brussel (Brussels Commercial Court) of 29 July 2004, received at the Court Registry on 18 August 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Lidl Belgium GmbH & Co KG against NV Etablissementen Franz Colruyt on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ L 250 of 19.9.1984, p. 17-20.

(2)OJ L 290 of 23.10.1997, p. 18-23.

----
<PAGE>
 
                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
                            STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is
made and entered into as of November 3, 1997, by and between TOMORROW'S MORNING,
INC., a California corporation (the "Company"), and Adam Linter ("Optionee")
with respect to the following facts and circumstances:

     A.     The Company previously entered into a Stock Option Agreement dated 
as of April 14, 1995 (the "Agreement"), with Optionee relating to 6% of the 
issued and outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock as of the date 
Optionee exercises the option. 

     B.     The Agreement has since been amended by an Amendment to Stock
Option Agreement dated as of April 18, 1997. All references to the Agreement
herein shall be deemed to include the terms of such amendment.

     C.     For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Optionee now desire to further
amend the Agreement in the following respects.

            1.     Amendment of Section 1.1.  Section 1.1 of the Agreement is 
                   ------------------------ 
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
 
                   "1.1  Grant of Option.  The Company, pursuant and subject 
                         ---------------
to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, grants to Optionee the right and
option (the "Option") to purchase, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth, 281,113 shares of the Company's Common Stock (the "Shares"). It is
intended by the parties hereto that the Shares subject to this Option are
dilutable by events prior to the exercise of the Option."

            2.     Ratification of Remaining Terms.  Except as expressly set 
                   -------------------------------
forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement, as 
previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the 
date first above written.

                                TOMORROW'S MORNING, INC.


                                By: /s/ Steven Raft
                                    ---------------------------    
                                Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                        -----------------------
                                   /s/ Adam Linter
                                -------------------------------
                                     Adam Linter

                                  
                               


                                  EXHIBIT 10
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DECEMBER 13, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-11466

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-02428-CV-CAM-1

MAURICE FRANKS, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus 

STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, 

ANDREW HAODAWAY, 

CALVIN D. MOOTINE, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(December 13, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Maurice Franks, a Georgia prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district

court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition

for lack of exhaustion of his state remedies. This appeal is governed by the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No.

104-32, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), because Franks filed his petition after the effective

date of the AEDPA. A judge of this Court granted a certificate of appealability

(COA) on: “Whether the district court erred by concluding that appellant had failed

to exhaust his state remedies with respect to the claims raised in his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas corpus petition.” For the reasons set forth more fully below, we

affirm.

Careful review of Franks’s appellate brief reveals that he has not addressed

the issue on which the COA was granted. Instead, Franks argues the merits of his

underlying claim. Under the AEDPA, appellate review is limited to the issues

specified in the COA. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Murray v. United States, 145 F.3d 1249,

1250-51 (11th Cir. 1998). However, Franks is a pro se litigant and is thus entitled

to a lenient interpretation of his arguments on appeal. See GJR Invs., Inc. v.

County of Escambia, Fla., 132 F.3d 1359, 1369 (11th Cir. 1998). Nevertheless, we

will not act as de facto counsel for a pro se litigant. Id. Even construing Franks’s

brief liberally, there is no indication that he presents any arguments regarding the
3

issue on appeal. Therefore, Franks has abandoned the issue on which we granted

the COA. See Atkins v. Singletary, 965 F.2d 952, 955 n.1 (11th Cir. 1992)

(concluding that an appellant abandons an issue not addressed on appeal). 

Accordingly, as Franks has shown no reversible error, the district court’s dismissal

of his § 2254 habeas petition is

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,776
<PP&E>                                           5,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,517
<SALES>                                         54,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,944
<CGS>                                           33,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    93
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (440)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,554)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
# C_2005132EN.01001102.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 17 March 2005

in Case C-128/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Dendermonde in the criminal proceedings against Annic Andréa Raemdonck and Raemdonck-Janssens BVBA (1)

1

(Road transport - Social legislation - Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 - Requirement to instal and use a tachograph - Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 - Exception for vehicles carrying material and equipment)

(2005/C 132/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-128/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Dendermonde (Belgium), made by decision of 19 January 2004, received at the Court on 9 March 2004, in the criminal proceedings against Annic Andréa Raemdonck and Raemdonck-Janssens BVBA — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet, U. Lõhmus and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 March 2005, in which it ruled:

| 1. | The terms ‘material or equipment’ in Article 13(1)(g) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport must, in the context of the exemption scheme provided for in Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport, be construed as covering not only ‘tools and instruments’, but also the goods, such as building materials or cables, which are required for the performance of the work involved in the main activity of the driver of the vehicle concerned. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The terms ‘material or equipment’ in Article 13(1)(g) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport must, in the context of the exemption scheme provided for in Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport, be construed as covering not only ‘tools and instruments’, but also the goods, such as building materials or cables, which are required for the performance of the work involved in the main activity of the driver of the vehicle concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
CRIMINAL NO. 209426

 209428

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1

Plaintiff §

VS. § AND PROBATE COURT OF

BELANDA FAYE PRUITT §

Defendant § BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

CLERK’S NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL

Defendant’s Name: BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Cause No.: 209426 and 209428

Style of Cause: The State of Texas vs. BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Court: COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1

Judge: Jerri Lee Mills

Appellant: BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Appellant’s Attorney: AZUWUIKE OKORAFOR

Appellant’s Attorney’s Address: 9250 UNITY 570752 HOUSTON TX 77257

Appellee: The State of Texas

Appellee’s Attorney: JERRI YENNE

Appellee’s Attorney’s Address: 111 EAST LOCUST, SUITE 408, ANGLETON, TX 77515

Offense: POSS CS PG 3 < 28G, MA and THEFT PROP >=$50<$500, MB

Date of Judgment: 06/08/2015

Amount of Appeal Bond: NONE

Punishment: 209426- 180 Days jail credit 1 day, $359 court costs- DL suspended 180 days

 209428- 180 Days jail credit 1 day, $319 court costs

In Jail—Yes or No? Yes

Date Motion for New Trial filed: NONE

Date of Notice of Appeal: 06/05/2015

Court Reporter: Sherri Stadter

Assigned: First Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Mailed to Court of Appeals: 7/1/2015

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/1/2015 12:05:18 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit 10.08
 TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.
DIRECTORS OPTION AGREEMENT
 
 Grant of Option
  Term
 (a)
    
    10 years from the Option Date;(b)
    
    the date one year after the Optionees death; or(c)
    
    the date the Optionees membership on the Board of Directors is
terminated for Cause (as defined in the Plan).
 Procedure for Exercise Section 11 Section 1
 Payment for Shares Section 11
 Options Not Transferable and Subject to Certain Restrictions
 Acceptance of Plan
 Compliance with Securities Laws




---



##### 



No Other Rights
 References
 Governing Law
 Adjustments
 Severability
 Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 No Third Party Beneficiary




---



##### 



THE COMPANY:TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.By:NameTitleOPTIONEE:NameSocial Security Number
Exhibit 99.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual Report") of Midwest Generation, LLC
(the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, based on his or her knowledge, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGIA NELSONGeorgia Nelson Chief Executive Officer
Midwest Generation, LLC
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith Chief Financial Officer
Midwest Generation, LLC

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Midwest Generation, LLC and will be retained by Midwest Generation, LLC and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or is staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 58401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8885]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Vodou: Sacred Powers of Haiti'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Vodou: Sacred Powers of Haiti,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Field Museum of 
Natural History, Chicago, IL, from on or about October 24, 2014, until 
on or about April 26, 2015, the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA, from 
on or about April 3, 2016, until on or about June 17, 2016, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 22, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-23107 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02778]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration 
Board (Board).

Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
February 12, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board 
concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090. Submit attendance requests via email to 
[email protected]. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. Please send an email to [email protected] at least 
24 hours before the meeting. In your email include: name, postal 
address, entity you are representing (if applicable), and telephone 
number. You will receive an email confirmation from us. Please be 
prepared to show a photo identification when you arrive. If you need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or if you have any questions, 
contact Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration 
Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting 
are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

 January 8, 2015

B. New Business

 Farmer Mac Board Governance and Standards of Conduct--Proposed 
Rule
 Spring 2015 Abstract of the Unified Agenda of Federal 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and Spring 2015 Regulatory Projects 
Plan

Closed Session *

Reports

 Office of Secondary Market Oversight Quarterly Report

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

    * Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552b(c)(8) 
and (9).

[FR Doc. 2015-02778 Filed 2-6-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                              FORM OF AMENDMENT TO
          AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 SHARE PURCHASE AND OPTION PLAN FOR
                         KEY EMPLOYEES OF TA I LIMITED


      Pursuant to Section 10 of the Amended and Restated 1998 Share Purchase and
Option Plan for Key Employees of TA I Limited (the "PLAN"), the Board of
Directors of Willis Group Holdings Limited, which, effective as of May 9, 2000,
adopted the Plan, hereby amends the Plan as follows:

1.    All references to "TA I Limited" shall hereinafter refer to "Willis
Group Holdings Limited".

2.    All references to "Ordinary Shares" or "Share" shall hereinafter refer to
management common shares of Willis Group Holdings Limited,; PROVIDED, HOWEVER,
that with respect to Grants made to Directors (as hereinafter defined), all
references to "Shares" shall hereinafter refer to common shares of Willis Group
Holdings Limited, par value $0.000115.

3.    All references to the word "director" shall be replaced with the term
"Director".

4.    Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

      (a) The definition of "Participant" in subsection 2(o) is amended by
inserting after the word "Employee" the phrase "or Director".

      (b) The definition in subsection 2(c) is amended by replacing the words in
brackets with "(within the meaning of Section 86 of the Companies Act 1981 of
Bermuda)".

      (c) A new subsection 2(s) shall be added after subsection 2(r):

            "(s) "Director" shall mean any member of the Board of Directors,
        whether or not an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary."

5.    Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting from the beginning
of the second sentence the word "None" and replacing it with the word "All".

6.    Section 4 is hereby amended by deleting the first and second sentences
thereof and replacing them with the following sentence:

      "The Committee may from time to time make Grants under the Plan, to such
      Directors and Employees, and in such form, and having such terms,
      conditions and limitations, as the Committee may determine."

7.    Section 5(a) is hereby amended by replacing all references to
"Participant" with the word "Employee".

<PAGE>
                                                                               2


8.    Section 6(a) is hereby amended by (a) inserting a period after the phrase
"30,00,000 Shares" and (b) inserting after the first sentence, as amended, the
following sentence:

        "The number of Shares subject to Grants made under this Plan to any one
        Participant in any given calendar year shall not be more than 10,000,000
        Shares."

9.    A new Section 14 shall be amended by replacing the phrase "Section 153 of
the Companies Act 1985" with the phrase "Section 39 of the Companies Act 1981 of
Bermuda".


Effective as of this ___________, 2001.