alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT NUMBER 11


                         RISCORP, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings
             For the three and nine months ended September 30, 1996

                                  (Unaudited)
           (Dollars in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                        September 30, 1996
                                                                        ------------------
<S>                                                                         <C>               
Net income                                                                  $       312
Weighted average common and common share equivalents outstanding:

     Average number of common shares outstanding                             35,639,300
     Redemption contingency for CompSource acquisition                            8,246
     Common stock equivalents - assumed exercise of stock options             1,838,145
                                                                            -----------
          Weighted average common and 
            common share equivalents outstanding                             37,485,691
                                                                            -----------

Earnings per share                                                          $       .01
                                                                            -----------
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                                        September 30, 1996
                                                                        ------------------
<S>                                                                         <C>               
Net income                                                                  $     9,301
Weighted average common and common share equivalents outstanding:

     Average number of common shares outstanding                            $33,884,758
     Redemption contingency for CompSource acquisition                            6,222
     Common stock equivalents - assumed exercise of stock options             1,829,108
                                                                            -----------        
          Weighted average common and 
            common share equivalents outstanding                             35,720,088
                                                                            -----------

Earnings per share                                                          $      0.26
                                                                            -----------
</TABLE>


                                      21
# C_2004273EN.01002201.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/22

---

Action brought on 21 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-399/04)

(2004/C 273/40)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Antonio Caeiros, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt and publish within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/2/EC of 6 January 2003 relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic (tenth adaptation to technical progress to Council Directive 76/769/EEC) (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 2 of Directive 2003/2/EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt and publish within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/2/EC of 6 January 2003 relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic (tenth adaptation to technical progress to Council Directive 76/769/EEC) (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 2 of Directive 2003/2/EC;

1

| 2. | declare, in the alternative, that by failing immediately to inform the Commission of those measures, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 2 of the abovementioned directive; |
| --- | --- |

2.

declare, in the alternative, that by failing immediately to inform the Commission of those measures, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 2 of the abovementioned directive;

| 3. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period prescribed for the transposition of the directive expired on 30 June 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 4, 9.1.2003, p. 9.

1

---
Consent of Independent
                          Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors
Profile Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-53575) on Form S-3 of Profile Technologies,  Inc. of our report dated August
18, 1998, relating to the balance sheet of Profile Technologies, Inc. as of June
30, 1998, and the related  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year  period ended June 30, 1998 and
for the period from July 1, 1988 (inception) through June 30, 1998, which report
appears  in the  June  30,  1998,  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Profile
Technologies, Inc.






Seattle, Washington
September 18, 1998
#### D’Amato, Appellant, vs. Cash and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Adolph G. Schwefel,*attorney, and *Walter G. Seher*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Bendinger & Hayes,*attorneys, and *John H. Schlosser*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
.PULASKI 

Dedicated to your success www.pulaskitech.edu 

Tecnntcat cuttege 

September 17, 201~ ,·~ 

U.S. Department qf. Transpprt~tion 

Docket Operations,'M-30 ··· 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-14o· 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, PC 20590 

~ '. 

SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. 

Exemption No: 10168 

Docket Number FAA-2002-13291 

De.ar Sir. or Madarn, .. . . . ' 

JE:fJARTMENT OF 

1 R/-.NSPORTAT!ON 

· ;'j:~'KET OPERATIONS 

ZU t l SEP 2 5 P I: 3 'l 

I am writing in response of the notice that my exemption for FAA testing will expire 

November 30, 201~. , , .. . . ; :'i ._. '·~ '· 

I request that an extehsion of th~ exemption be approved for my organization. The 

ability to test students upon the completion of training has greatly benefited their ability 

to succeed in their pursuit of FAA mechanics certification. In the past a student had to 

complete 12 months of training before being evaluated on the first 3 months of that 

training. 

Since the approval of this exemption the completion rate of our curriculum has 

increased. The number of students completing the entire maintenance training program 

has also increased. 

With the implantation of this exemption students are more confident and self reliant as to 

their ability to succeed in the program. It has benefited this program immensely. 

I hope to have our exemption extended another 2 years. Please contact me if you have 

any questions. 

Steven 

Sincerely, 

~~ 

L. Hotle, Director 

Pulaski Technical College -

Aviation Technology Center 

PH: (501) 835-5420 

FX: (501) 834-7859 

Aviation Maintenance Technology Center 

16oo West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock. AR 72120 Phone ')01·835·5420 ·fax 501-834·7859 
Date: 04/26/2012 

Exemption No: 10168 from 14 CFR (FAP Section)- Part: 

65.75 (a) 

will expire on 11/30/2012. If appropriate, please submit 

your request to extend this exemption (including the 

docket number FAA-2002-13291) within 30 days of the 

date of this notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be able 

to process your request for extension before the 

expiration date. You may either submit your request 

electronically through the internet using the Docket 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Steve Hotle 

Director 

Pulaski Technical College 

1600 West Maryland Avenue 

North Little Rock, AR 

72120 

Submission to other locations may delay processing. 

Any request for extension must meet the 

requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already 

requested an extension for this exemption or no longer 

need this exemption, please ignore this noticj. \ li l Ill Ill \\ II II\ 1\ Ill j IIIII 11 \1 Ill II I IIIII I Ill I II I II Ill llllll 1
I MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET t.ie e ting: P"'/ /1; ;tX t.1 eet ing D a t e : t1 ,4-e c f; ? ..r 1 2 ,,..J(J- .- Name (please print) ((;IV

i /:!Zi tyv'tl **M~jd. £\-Zo~h;**  -; t::t you t< 1 j-e.e...- - ..,.- c:· , tt;..\ •) t **~** ...)a_ ,.. \; \ **L~,** ....s<. ?u 1} Z **Rose~/** ;1on **MA~A** Th-A V- ( **~\M{liVL-**

**--** s **'~ ~**  )V\.V<A **~r ftAJ**  **~to C:tCvJ.~**  c:S **K~** Company EPA-
I , J /7/Jr r ( ' D £ P A/o.PPI **~~~AP £P!f.joPPT(cEs** 
**~** C.p fli C'PPI

I C..\.._:>:,.JJ F f (I I 0 f PI I c ( D fPt:t/ o PP/ 1 f,Ncf'{!3 er A(ofrr

c co **t=f~/ ff!**  ceo .D Yt\J4_>t / , f

E - Mail k:f? 4 s,.A-'1( Tt.:/V/6-'

f:: I ,d- /I.-e- L. e-\ - i!C>c:>6,. **t(\.~c\~**

e. **~·_50\J f~e** 

**.** Jcjouu 1@ <?fa

• <jCIV "=>0R te.l1

. **.f.~~b .:-.G::-'**  q, .:. · .· 1""". Phone ?o,·

- J'"G.y- ufcP}'- 2o2..

- 564- **85~** r

l **l-** r-6t£

- Ff-1 r **~c-~ ",)G**  **'-\- 'S...,•**  **;** 6 ? " 'i ,e . \ o ..- ,, --t E **e~a._.** ') u v' '1.. o"}

- \Co4

- '1 (.':) **~4** A I **~'** ':>tn

I ' ({:ij2-/i) q,:. ·f aV ?ff2./ SG '-1- **~** 1 b J:tCll fV\ \ilJ J- 1 Q € { f' t L n c- D v 2£ z_ _5 **~** _ & c 1 B s ( 'GU s lv\au

1 ka1h **ff;~O>eparv**
**~ NV~** 

- **~** (b tt- 7{ **I~** b.tyRAJ

. R.tl-m bo@ **dpJA't~ t.orl**  f/Cf **f~'(** Oz. o Z.... c **haj,Jh~l(i)** .Ji'''"'>' urp.c,.,., .kl **A~**
.. **"t~07/lVLYC4y**

**. ~**  /IV 1 0 c; (} 2-0 L . //

# dynax corporation 79 westchesteravenue p.o. box 285 pound ridge, ny 10576 tel: 914-764-0202 fax: 914-764-0553



# DATE: TO: March 24, 2015 Mr. Toni Krasnic EPA Email: krasnic.toni@epa.gov FROM: Eduard Kleiner Dynax Email: ed.kleiner@dynaxcorp.com SUBJECT: EPA 

# I Dynax Meeting March 25, 2015 Dear Mr. Toni, 

# A DYNAX

EMAIL

I like to confirm that Dr. Chang Jho, Mr. Bryan Rambo and myselfwill attend the above meeting scheduled for 1:00 pm. Wewill arrive at Reagan National at 9:21 am and spend sometimewith Tom Cortina of FFFC beforethe EPA/Dynax meeting and can be reached via cell phone (914) 629 0297 (Dr. Chang Jho) while in Washington. Itwould be great ifyou could let me knowwhofrom the EPAwill attend the meeting or how many peoplewill attend. Thiswould help us to prepareforthe meeting. Do you think itwill help ifwe bring with us multiple copies ofour response to the Proposed Rule (EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0225)thatwe mailed outto your attention lastweek? Thanks foryour help and best regards,

# Ed**~E ~**  EK!ag



# d nax
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Examination of Spent PWR Fuel Rods After 15 Years in Dry Storage (NUREG/CR-6831)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6831 (PDF - 7.87 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2002**Date Published:** September 2003

**Prepared by:** RE. Einziger, H. Tsai, M.C. Billone, B.A. Hilton*

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

*Argonne National Laboratory-West P.O. Box 2528 Idaho Falls, ID 83403

S. Basu, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code Y6248

**Prepared for**: Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

For 15 years 15 x 15 PWR fuel (35.7 GWd/MTU) was stored in a dry inertatmosphere Castor V/21 cask as peak cladding temperatures decreased from =350 to 150°C. Before storage, the loaded cask was subjected to extensive thermalbenchmark tests, during which time the peak temperatures were >400°C. The cask was opened to examine the fuel rods for degradation and to determine if they were suitable for extended storage. In the central region of the fuel column, the measured hydrogen content of the cladding is consistent with the thickness of the oxide layer. At higher elevations, there is less hydrogen than would be expected from the oxide thickness. Migration of hydrogen to the cooler ends of the rod probably occurred during dry storage. The volume of hydrides varies azimuthally around the cladding but all of the hydrides appear to have retained a circumferential orientation. Little or no cladding creep occurred during thermalbenchmark testing and dry storage. Poststorage creep testing indicated that the cladding retains significant creep ductility after dry-cask storage. It is anticipated that the creep would not increase appreciably during additional storage because of the low temperature after 15 years. Based on the Surry fuel rod data, no deleterious effects of 15-years of dry cask storage were observed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Animal Trails and Walkways, Dust Control from Animal Activity on Open Lot Surfaces, Feed Management, Fence, Forage and Biomass Planting, Heavy Use Area Protection, Integrated Pest Management, Livestock Pipeline, Nutrient Management, Pond, Spring Development, Stream Crossing, Water Well, Watering Facility.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Kansas - Fiscal Year 2024
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2017

NO. 03-17-00273-CV

Daniel J. Caldwell, Appellant

v.

Jennifer E. Zimmerman, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 4, 2017. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
# C_2005055EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 March 2005

(2005/C 55/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3144 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6878 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0464 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5461 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,88 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2210 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5830 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,585 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 242,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4310 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9040 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 443 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,73 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,896 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6784 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6746 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,252 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8049 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1381 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7793 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3144

JPY

Japanese yen

137,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6878

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0464

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5461

ISK

Iceland króna

79,88

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2210

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5830

CZK

Czech koruna

29,585

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

242,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4310

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9040

ROL

Romanian leu

36 443

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,73

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,896

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6784

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6746

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,252

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8049

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1381

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,68

ZAR

South African rand

7,7793

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Precision Drilling Corporation on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Chief Executive
Officer of Precision Drilling Corporation, hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Precision Drilling Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                    
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | March 9, 2016                                      
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kevin Neveu                                    
|       |  | Kevin A. Neveu, President & Chief Executive Officer
|       |  | of Precision Drilling Corporation                  



9
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02355]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: February 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 107 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-26, CP2015-35.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2015-02355 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2004228EN.01000301.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-495/01: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 77/388/EEC - VAT - Article 11(A)(1)(a) - Taxable amount - Subsidy directly linked to the price - Regulation (EC) No 603/95 - Aid granted in the dried fodder sector)

(2004/C 228/05)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-495/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and I. Koskinen) v Republic of Finland (Agent: T. Pynnä) supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma) and by Kingdom of Sweden (Agents: A. Kruse and A. Falk) — application for a declaration that, by failing to levy value added tax on aid paid under Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 of 21 February 1995 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (OJ 1995 L 63, p. 1), the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 58 of 2.3.2002.

1

---