alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005006EN.01000302.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 11 November 2004

in Joined Cases C-186/02 P and C-188/02 P: Ramondín SA, Ramondín Cápsulas SA (C-186/02 P), Territorio Histórico de Álava – Diputación Foral de Álava (C-188/02 P) v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Tax measures - Misuse of powers - Statement of reasons - New pleas in law)

(2005/C 6/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Joined Cases C-186/02 P and C-188/02 P: two appeals under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 15 and 16 May 2002, Ramondín SA, established in Logroño (Spain), and Ramondín Cápsulas SA, established in Laguardia (Spain), (Lawyer: J. Lazcano-Iturburu Ayestaran) C-186/02 P, Territorio Histórico de Álava – Diputación Foral de Álava (Lawyers: A. Creus Carreras, B. Uriarte Valiente and M. Bravo-Ferrer Delgado) C-188/02 P, the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Santaolalla Gadea and J. L. Buendía Sierra), supported by Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja, (Lawyer: J. Criado Gámez) - the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), F. Macken, N. Colneric and J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; M. Múgica Azarmendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 11 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Joins Cases C-186/02 P and C-188/02 P for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases C-186/02 P and C-188/02 P for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 3. | Orders the appellants, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the Commission and the Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the appellants, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the Commission and the Comunidad Autónoma de La Rioja.

---

(1)  OJ C 191 of 10.8.2002.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Med Pro Venture Capital, Inc., f/k/a Modern PVC, Inc. because of questions regarding the accuracy of publicly available information about the company's operations, including questions about the accuracy of statements in a company press release dated January 12, 2015 and a paid analyst's report issued on January 9, 2015 describing a strategic partnership with GO CNG technologies. Med Pro Venture Capital, Inc. is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business located in Scottsdale, Arizona. Its stock is quoted on OTC Link, operated by OTC Markets Group Inc., under the ticker: MPVC.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, It Is Ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m.                           ( print page 7521)                        EST on February 6, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EST on February 20, 2015.                

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02794 Filed 2-6-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,469
<PP&E>                                          10,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,295
<BONDS>                                          1,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,343
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,141
<SALES>                                            521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,332
<CGS>                                              490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,290
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements  on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-11492, File No. 333-36785, File
No. 333-37420 and File No. 333-70951) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-08249, File
No.  333-08251, File No. 333-30854, File No.  333-30926,
File No.  333-55316, File No. 333-66903 and File No. 333-70947) of New
Century Equity Holdings Corp. of our report dated March 25, 2008, which appears
on page 21 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
  /s/ BURTON McCUMBER & CORTEZ,
L.L.P.
 
 Brownsville,
Texas
 March 26,
2008
Exhibit 32.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K/A
for  the  period ending July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof,  I, Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller and
Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

1)   the  Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2)   the  information  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the  Company.


By /s/ Antonio Estrada
Antonio Estrada
Corporate Controller
and Principal Financial Officer
March 2, 2004


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 14, 2006 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------------ | --------------------
|                         | John P. Manning     
|                         | Director, President 
|                         | (Principal Executive
|                         | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                         | Assignor Corp.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1942 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1942

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Comptroller 
 General of the United States to periodically conduct an audit of the 
     Veterans Health Administration budget, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

   Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Comptroller 
 General of the United States to periodically conduct an audit of the 
     Veterans Health Administration budget, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPTROLLER GENERAL AUDIT OF BUDGET OF VETERANS HEALTH 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 7330C. COMPTROLLER GENERAL AUDIT OF VHA BUDGET.

    ``(a) In General.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
shall periodically conduct an audit of elements of the budget of the 
Veterans Health Administration, including the budget formulation, 
execution, allocation, and use of funds.
    ``(b) Selection of Elements.--(1) In selecting elements of the 
budget of the Veterans Health Administration for purposes of an audit 
under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall take into 
consideration--
            ``(A) knowledge of the programs of the Veterans Health 
        Administration;
            ``(B) current issues;
            ``(C) national priorities; and
            ``(D) priorities expressed by the appropriate congressional 
        committees.
    ``(2) Not later than 30 days before conducting an audit under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees notice of the elements selected by the 
Comptroller General for purposes of the audit.
    ``(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section, the 
term `appropriate congressional committees' means--
            ``(1) the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, the Committee on 
        Appropriations, and the Committee on the Budget of the Senate; 
        and
            ``(2) the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, the Committee on 
        Appropriations, and the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
        Representatives.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
7330B the following new item:

``7330C. Comptroller General audit of VHA budget.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date:        |  |                            
|May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|             |  |                            
|             |  | John P. Manning            
|             |  | Principal Executive Officer
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:** Conservation Crop Rotation, Diversion, Grassed Waterway, Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Water Management, Nutrient Management, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
EXHIBIT 99.3



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Precision Drilling Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hank B. Swartout, Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

       By:   /S/ HANK B. SWARTOUT
             --------------------
             Hank B. Swartout
             Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2005
#### Page, Respondent, vs. Page, by guardian *ad.*litem, Appellant.

*October 7*

November *5, 1929.*

*643For the appellant there was a brief by *Hughes & Anderson*of Superior, and oral argument by *R. E. Anderson.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Wilson & Wilson*of Superior, and oral argument by *Henry C. Wilson.*

Eschweiler, J.

We are satisfied that judgment should have been directed for the defendant in this case under the rule now adopted in this state that the driver of an automobile on the public highway owes to the gratuitous guest the duty to exercise ordinary care not to increase the danger to the guest or to create a new danger. *Cleary v. Eckart,*191 Wis. 114, 117, 210 N. W. 267, 51 A. L. R. 576, and the subsequent cases of *Olson v. Hermansen,*196 Wis. 614, 619, 220 N. W. 203, and *Krueger v. Krueger,*197 Wis. 588, 222 N. W. 784. See, also, note in 61 A. L. R. 1252.

In this case the sole negligence found by the jury or suggested in the record was with respect to the speed with which the defendant drove around the curve.

*644This propensity in the daughter, in common with many drivers, of turning corners at a dangerous rate of speed was, under the uncontradicted evidence in this case, well known to the mother; for the plaintiff herself testifies that usually she felt quite safe with her daughter’s driving, “but sometimes I feel nervous in turning a corner, turn a little too fast,” and that defendant was driving in her usual manner at the time of the accident, and that at other times she drove faster. The plaintiff, therefore, in becoming a gratuitous guest as she did, with a driver who she knew had the very fault, failing, or custom, whichever it may be, which caused the accident, of making turns too fast for safety, must be held under the authorities above cited to have knowingly assumed such risk.

The situation here is so near like that disclosed in *Olson v. Hermansen,*196 Wis. 614, 619, 220 N. W. 203, supra, as to make it unnecessary to now indulge in further discussion.

The jury’s findings that the defendant was not driving her automobile in her usual and customary manner immediately prior to the accident, and that the plaintiff was not -familiar with the manner of defendant’s driving, are so clearly contrary to the undisputed evidence in this case that they can have no weight in its determination.

In so disposing of this case on the ground that the plaintiff assumed the risk, it is unnecessary to consider or decide the question of possible non-liability because of the relationship between the parties and defendant’s minority, just as we left a similar question undetermined in *Krueger v. Krueger,*197 Wis. 588, 222 N. W. 784, *supra.*

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the action.
#### State *v.*Commissioners of Fayetteville,

*1*[-From Cumberland. J

Wliere Defendants are bound to keep the streets of an incorporated town in order, and three or four streets are presented on the same day, the Defendants should be indicted but once for all — if separate bills be-found, on a conviction on one, it may be pleaded in bar to the others.

The Defendants, seven in number, being Commissioners of the town of Fayetteville, as such were bound to keep all the streets, &e. within the limits of the town in repair ; there were three or four different streets presented as being out of repair, all on the same day, for which separate bills of indictment were preferred against the Defendants in each case.

The Defendants being convicted on *one*indictment, pleaded it in bar to the others 3 and the question before this Court was, whether it was a good plea in bar.

Tayiok, Chief-Justice.

The Defendants are bound to keep all the streets of the town, in repair, and are liable to an indictment upon every neglect of this duty. But if more than one street is out of repair at the same time, this does not multiply the offences, though the one committed must take its nature and degree from the greater or less negligence with which it is attended. It would be monstrous to charge them with separate indictments for every street in the town, when the whole were out of repair at the same time 3 especially when upon one indictment a fine can bo imposed adequate to the real estimate of the offence. Were such a doctrine tolerated, it is impossible to say where its consequences would end3 for then an overseer whose road is out of repair might be charged in separate indictments, for every hundred yar(|s, (why not every yard ?) and be ruined by the costs, when perhaps a moderate fine would atone for the offence. This notion *3720f rendering crimes, like matter infinitely divisible, is repugnant to the spirit and policy of the law and ought not to be countenanced. It is the opinion of the Court that the plea of *auterfait convict,*relied on by the Defendant, is a bar to all the other indictments.