alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08083 vu# ~, ;~vJ 

~~. / f-. 

b 3 1"1. ETR Information 

~~ Practices 

and Security procedures and 

1. Mr. Nitze approved Dr. Flax's recommendations 

related to Cape Kennedy information and security procedures and practices which in summary were: 

(A) "Closed launch" (similar to VAFB) handling 

ofc===Jand all NRP ETR launchings to follow. 

(B) Some modification of Cape Kennedy information and security procedures and practices for all 

DOD ETR launchings to 'complement as appropriate. 

2. Public information policy guidance for Program 

~has been drafted at SECRET level, consistent with 

above, to be forwarded by SAFOI to AFSC. Col Cheadle 

AFSC PIa, soon to becom Executive Officer, has been 

briefed in the matter in depth. 

3. Representatives of SAFSP advise they have 

avoided those ETR usually provided support services, not 

necessary toc===J which could result in security problems, 

by advising Commander ETR that they did not require them 

and did not want them. They also advise that all "black" 

security arrangements have been laid on at ETR as 

necessary to forthcomin~launch. 

4. COS/USAF will be briefed on the matter in depth 

by General Garland. 

CONTROL SYSY2M ONLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08083 

I 
5. A "whi te" ~ Secret memo from General Berg to 

Gen He1tdrick (info COS) is in preparation which will advise 

him of Dep Sec Def decision and ask that review of Cape 

Kennedy information and security procedures and practices 

be undertaken ASAP and that modifications appropriate to 

the long range problem be instituted. Col Nelsen of 

General Hedrick's office has been briefed on the matter 

in depth. 

6. Mr. Frank Rand has been briefed on the matter in 

depth for the benefit of the National Space Council. 

7. Mr. Myron Krueger will be briefed on the matter 

in depth for the benefit of Gen Smar.t of NASA. 

8. Mr. Hewitt of State Dept will be briefed on the 

problem in depth. 

9. Appropriate response to possible congressional 

inquiry is in preparation. 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08083 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 08083
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Short Term Storage of Animal Waste (Code

318) 

Temporary, nonstructural measures used to store solid or

semisolid organic agricultural waste or manure (stackable

livestock and poultry manure, bedding, litter, spilled feed, or

soil mixed with manure) on a short-term basis between

collection and utilization. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of short-term storage of animal waste and by-products is to temporarily stockpile or store

animal waste such as organic by-products, stackable livestock and poultry manure, bedding, litter,

spilled feed, or soil mixed with manure in an environmentally safe manner. Short-term storage

provides improved nutrient utilization and conservation through greater flexibility in nutrient application

timing and protects surface and ground water resources as well as reduces energy use. 

Site conditions, climate, and State or local laws may require short-term storage stockpiles to be

covered. Covers may include plastic sheeting, geotextile, or geotextile bags. 

Short-term storage planning should incorporate environmental concerns, economics, the overall

waste management system plan, and safety and health factors. 

The design of short-term storage depends on the intended storage period; the site location and

foundation soils; Federal, State, and local laws and regulations; waste volume; stock pile covering;

and safety concerns. 

An operation and maintenance plan is developed to specify requirements for utilizing the stored

manure. The plan specifies timing, rates, and volume of waste applications. An emergency action plan

will be developed where there is a potential for an accidental manure spill event. 

Common Associated Practices 

The Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Short-Term Storage of Animal Waste and By-Products

(Code 318) is commonly applied with CPSs such as Nutrient Management (Code 590) and Waste

Recycling (Code 633). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Biomass Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/08/2008 Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

# Thermochemical Conversion Processes Gasification In gasification conversion, lignocellulosic feedstocks such as wood and forest products are broken down to synthesis gas, primarily carbon monoxide and hydrogen, using heat. The feedstock is then partially oxidized, or reformed with a gasifying agent (air, oxygen, or steam), which produces synthesis gas (syngas). The makeup of syngas will vary due to the different types of feedstocks, their moisture content, the type of gasifier used, the gasification agent, and the temperature and pressure in the gasifier.

Gas Cleanup and Conditioning The syngas produced undergoes clean-up and conditioning to create a contaminant-free gas having the appropriate hydrogen-carbon monoxide ratio prior to the catalytic conversion step.
Among the contaminants removed during clean-up are tars, acid gas, ammonia, alkali metals, and other particulates.
Syngas is then conditioned: hydrogen sulfide levels are reduced by sulfur polishing, and hydrogen-carbon monoxide ratio is adjusted using water-gas shift. 

## Pyrolysis In pyrolysis processing, biomass feedstocks are broken down using heat in the absence of oxygen, producing a biooil that can be further refined to a hydrocarbon product. The decomposition occurs at lower temperatures than gasification processes, and produces liquid oil instead of a synthesis gas. Oil produced varies in oxygen content or viscosity according to the feedstock used.

Bio-Oil Cleanup Oil produced in pyrolysis processing must have particulates and ash removed in filtration to create a homogenous product. The oil is then upgraded to hydrocarbon fuels via hydrotreating and hydrocracking processing, which reduces its total oxygen content.

Printable Version Site Map EERE Information Center Programs and Offices



### Quick Links

z
z
z
z

z
z Biomass FAQs

Program Overview Program Research Financial Opportunities Publications Contact Us 

# Page 1 of 1 Biomass Program: Thermochem ical Conversion Processes

7/20/2010 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ thermochemical_processes.html
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-1981 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-204-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 8.0 $ 680.00 $0 $ 680.00 89 $60,520.00

0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $60,520

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 June 2004

(2004/C 151/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
# C_2005052EN.01000101.xml

| 2.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 March 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 March 2005

(2005/C 52/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3216 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0517 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5357 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5834 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,630 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,78 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4311 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8763 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 281 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,71 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,838 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6941 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6771 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6306 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3082 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8201 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1448 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7193 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3216

JPY

Japanese yen

137,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4420

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68790

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0517

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5357

ISK

Iceland króna

80,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5834

CZK

Czech koruna

29,630

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,78

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4311

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8763

ROL

Romanian leu

36 281

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,71

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,838

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6941

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6771

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6306

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3082

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8201

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1448

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,55

ZAR

South African rand

7,7193

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
1

Collins, Kathleen

From: Collins, Kathleen

Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:16 PM

To: Bobby Brunoe; Deepak Sehgal; James Holt; Jason Fenton; Jason Robison; Ken Clark; Kris 

Fischer; Margaret Corvi; Michael Karnosh; Mike Kennedy; Mike Wilson; Paul Ward; Peter 

Wakeland; Phil Rigdon; Robin Harris

Cc: Soscia, Marylou; Chung, Angela

Subject: Consultation Offer on EPA's proposed rulemaking to Revise Oregon's aquatic life criteria for 

copper and cadmium

Attachments: Tribal Consultation_Proposed Fed Rulemaking_Rev Frswter Aquatc Life Cri_Acute CadChronic Copper.pdf

Good Afternoon, 

Enclosed is a letter being mailed out today that extends an offer of tribal consultation on an 

upcoming EPA rulemaking. In early 2016, EPA will be proposing to promulgate freshwater 

aquatic life criteria for acute cadmium and acute and chronic copper for the state of Oregon. 

A conference call will be held on December 15th from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM to discuss the 

rulemaking and answer any questions you may have. The call-in number is: 

866-299-3188, the conference code is 206 553 1256#. 

If you are unable to participate in the conference call but would like to discuss the rulemaking 

please feel free to call me at 206-553-2108. (Please note that I will be out of the office from 

December 21st through January 8th). Thanks, 

Kathleen Collins 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Sixth Ave, Suite 900, OWW-191 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Phone: 206-553-2108
# C_2005057EN.01002801.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/28

---

Action brought on 19 November 2004 by Thomas Peyker against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-470/04)

(2005/C 57/47)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 19 November 2004 by Thomas Peyker, residing in Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic), represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission's decision to award points making up the ‘rucksack’, and the decision not to promote the applicant to Grade A6 in the 2003 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision to award points making up the ‘rucksack’, and the decision not to promote the applicant to Grade A6 in the 2003 promotion procedure;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case challenges the appointing authority's refusal to promote him to Grade A6 in the 2003 promotion procedure, and the award of insufficient, in that regard, merit/priority points making up his ‘rucksack’.

In support of his claims, the applicant alleges breach of Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations, and of the principles of non-discrimination and that officials should have reasonable career prospects.

He submits, in that regard, that the refusal to award him special additional priority points just because, although he had been put forward for promotion by his Directorate-General in the preceding promotion procedure, he was not within the limit of 150 % of the available promotions, amounts to assimilating him to officials who were not put forward by their superiors for the preceding procedure, in breach of the principle that merit is the determining criterion for all promotions.

In addition, transitional priority points were awarded in this case without taking account of the staff reports established for the reference period and without having considered comparative merits.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Kenneth P. Pavlich, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
      presented in the Report.




Date:
      April 13, 2009
                
                /s/
      Kenneth P. PavlichKenneth
      P. Pavlich
                  President
      & Chief Executive
Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Capitan
Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and will be retained by El Capitan
Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2021241DE.01001801.xml

| 8.7.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 241/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 241/18

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1998 der Kommission vom 5. November 2015 zur Festlegung detaillierter Maßnahmen für die Durchführung der gemeinsamen Grundstandards für die Luftsicherheit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 299 vom 14. November 2015
  )

Seite 13, Anhang, Nummer 3.2.2.1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe c:

Anstatt:

| „c) | die Außentüren müssen verriegelt sein oder“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Außentüren müssen verriegelt sein oder“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | die Außentüren müssen verschlossen sein oder“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Außentüren müssen verschlossen sein oder“.

Seite 124, Anhang, Nummer 11.2.3.8 einleitender Satz:

Anstatt:

„Die Schulung von Personen, die mit der Zuordnung von aufgegebenem Gepäck betraut sind, muss alle folgenden Kompetenzen gewährleisten:“

muss es heißen:

„Die Schulung von Personen, die mit der Zuordnung von aufgegebenem Gepäck betraut sind, muss zur Erlangung aller folgenden Kompetenzen führen:“.

---
EXHIBIT
99.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date:
March
25,
2008                                                By:
/s/
Joseph M. Cummins


Joseph M. Cummins


President, Chief Executive
Officer





Date:
March
25,
2008                                                By:
/s/
Gary W. Coy


Gary W. Coy


Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer
# Soil Erosion Tools

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Soil Erosion Tools 

Soil erosion tools & links

**RHEM**The RHEM Web Tool is a web-based interface for the **Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM)**. RHEM is designed to provide sound, science-based technology to model and predict runoff and erosion rates on rangelands and to assist in assessing rangeland conservation practice effects.

**RUSLE2**Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) estimates soil loss caused by rainfall and its associated overland flow.

**WEPP**Water Erosion Prediction Program (WEPP) predicts water erosion with a process-based, distributed parameter, continuous simulation, model for use on personal computers running Windows 95/98/NT/2000/XP/Vista/Windows7.

**WEPS**Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) predicts many forms of soil erosion by wind such as saltation-creep and suspension including PM-10 using a process-based, continuous, daily time-step model that simulates weather, field conditions, crop growth, and hydrology.
*October 13, 1931.*

#### Associated Gas & Oil Company, Appellant, vs. McCord and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Joseph A. Barly*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: /. *A. C. Lightner*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                                LETTER AGREEMENT


     This LETTER AGREEMENT (the "Letter Agreement") relating to that certain
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT dated as of May 30, 1997 (the "Registration Rights
Agreement") by and between Pierre Narath ("Narath") and Award Software
International, Inc., a California corporation (the "Company") is entered into as
of March 1, 1998.

                                  WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Registration Rights Agreement,
Narath and the Company desire to terminate the Registration Rights Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Company entering into a loan
transaction to lend the principal aggregate amount of two hundred thousand
dollars ($200,000) to Narath pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in a
promissory note of even date herewith, Narath and the Company hereby agree to
waive all rights pursuant to, and effect the termination of, the Registration
Rights Agreement such that the Registration Rights Agreement shall have no
further force and effect.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly caused this Letter Agreement to
be executed as of the date first above written.


AWARD SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.



By: /s/ Kevin J. Berry                  /s/ Pierre A. Narath
    ______________________________      ___________________________________
    Name:  KEVIN J. BERRY               PIERRE A. NARATH
    Title: Chief Financial Officer