alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 12 November 2004

(2004/C 278/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### Pusch, Administrator, Respondent, vs. Pusch, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Sawyer & Gehl*of Hartford.

For the respondent: *Russell & Goetz*of Hartford.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Gulczynski, Plaintiff, vs. Lynn Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant: Wincek, Respondent.

For the appellant: *H. G. Haight*of Neillsville.

For the respondent: *I. E. Rasmus*of Chippewa Falls.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### Rehfeldt and wife, Respondents, vs. Haag and wife, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Catlin & Catlin*of Appleton.

For the respondents: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.^
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1985 

To provide for the appointment of additional immigration judges. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the appointment of additional immigration 

judges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Children 

5 Now Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may ap8 point 70 additional immigration judges in addition to im9 migration judges currently serving as of the date of enact10 ment of this Act. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1985 IH

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

2 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

3 necessary to carry out this section. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is made and
entered into this ___ day of November, 1998 by and between Xionics Document
Technologies, Inc. ("Xionics") and Peter J. Simone ("Simone").

WHEREAS, Xionics entered into an Employment Agreement with Simone as of March
18, 1998 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein in
order to effectuate a resolution of Xionics' Board of Directors (the "Board")
adopted on October 28, 1998 regarding the extension of certain executives' and
senior managers' time to exercise vested stock options in the event their
employment is terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that the Agreement is amended by adding
the following to the Agreement as new Section 6.3(d):

         "(d) In the event Simone's employment is actually or constructively
         terminated in a manner described in Section 6.3(b) above, any and all
         of his stock options that were granted on or after February 27, 1998
         and that are vested at the date of such termination shall be
         exercisable for a period of twenty-four (24) months from and after the
         date of such termination, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
         the provision(s) of Simone's Stock Option Agreement(s) governing the
         exercisability of his stock options after termination of employment;
         provided, that if the Board should determine, upon receipt of a written
         opinion of Xionics' independent public accountants, that giving effect
         to this Section 6.3(d) would preclude accounting for any proposed
         business combination of Xionics with another entity as a pooling of
         interests, and the Board otherwise desires to approve such a proposed
         business combination which requires as a condition to the closing of
         such transaction that it be accounted for as a pooling of interests,
         then this Section 6.3(d) shall be null and void, but only if its
         absence would preserve the pooling treatment."

Except as amended herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect as
originally written.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto
have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written
above.


EMPLOYER:                                              EMPLOYEE:

XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By: /s/ Carolyn E. Ramm                                /s/ Peter J. Simone
    -----------------------------------------          -------------------------
    Title: Secretary                                   Peter J. Simone


By: /s/ Paul R. Low
    -----------------------------------------
    Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors
# C_2004239EN.01002101.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 July 2004

in Case T-384/02: Fernando Valenzuela Marzo v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Pay - Installation allowance - Article 9(3) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Period of one year)

(2004/C 239/43)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-384/02: Fernando Valenzuela Marzo, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at Brussels (Belgium), represented by M.–A. Lucas, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Curral and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) - application for, first, annulment of the Commission's decisions of 16 November 2001 and 13 February 2002, refusing the applicant the second half of the installation allowance on the ground that his family did not settle at his place of employment within the period laid down in the regulations of one year from his taking up his post and, second, an order that the Commission pay him the second half of the installation allowance with interest thereon at an annual rate of 8 % - the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

1

---
# C_2005132EN.01001101.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 17 March 2005

in Case C-109/04 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht): Karl Robert Kranemann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (1)

1

(Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) - Freedom of movement for workers - Civil servant undergoing preparatory practical training - Practical training completed in another Member State - Reimbursement of travel expenses limited to the domestic stretch of the journey)

(2005/C 132/20)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-109/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany), made by decision of 17 December 2003, received at the Court on 2 March 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Karl Robert Kranemann and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, K. Schiemann and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) precludes a national measure which grants a person who has completed a practical training period under conditions of genuine and effective activity as an employed person in a Member State other than his Member State of origin the right to reimbursement of travel expenses only up to the amount incurred in respect of the domestic stretch of the journey, while providing that, if such an activity were carried out on national territory, all the travel costs would be reimbursed.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 10.13(d)
 Fourth Amendment to the  Sterling Chemicals, Inc.  Amended and Restated Hourly Paid Employees Pension Plan
 Whereas Corporation Existing
Plan
 Whereas
 Whereas Amendment
 Now, Therefore
 Amendment of Section 6.2 of the Existing Plan
 6.2 Amount
  (a)
    
    Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) below, the amount of
such benefit shall be reduced by 1/4 of one percent for each full calendar month by
which his Annuity Starting Date precedes his Normal Retirement Date.(b)
    
    If a Participant attains the age 55 prior to the termination of his
employment with the Employer and the sum of a Participants age and years of
Service equals or exceeds 80 as of the first day of the month next following the
month in which his employment terminates, the reduction in clause (a) above will
not apply on his Early Retirement Date.(c)
    
    If a Participant is between the ages of 54 and 55 and is involuntarily
terminated by an Employer, other than for cause, as part of the formal reduction in
force or layoff program during the first calendar quarter of 2010, such Participant
will continue to receive Service credit until he attains the age of 55 and, if at
the time such Participant attains the age of 55, the sum of such Participants age
and years of Service equals or exceeds 80, the reduction in clause (a) above will
not apply on his Early Retirement Date.




---



##### 



Effect of Amendments
 Binding Effect
 Severability
 Governing Law To The Extent Not Superseded By The Laws Of The United
States, This Amendment Shall Be Construed and Enforced in Accordance With, and the Rights
of the Parties Shall Be Governed By, the Internal Laws of the State of Texas, Without Reference to
Principles of Conflicts of Law.
 In Witness Whereof
 Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Kenneth M. Hale, Senior Vice President andGeneral Counsel
 -2-
<PAGE>


AMENDMENT TO PERSONAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT with an effective date of January 1,
1996.


        BETWEEN:                                GRANITE REINSURANCE COMPANY
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
                           LTD.; A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE DULY INCORPORATED,
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                 HAVING ITS OFFICES AT
                                                 ---------------------
                                             BISHOP'S COURT HILL, ST. MICHAEL,
                                             ---------------------------------
                                                 BARBADOS, WEST INDIES;
                                                 ----------------------
                                  (hereinafter referred to as the "Company")


AND                                                           G. GORDON SYMONS,
EXECUTIVE,
                                  RESIDING AT 3 QUEEN'S COVE, APT. B6,
                                  FAIRYLANDS, PEMBROKE, BERMUDA, HM 05;
                                  (hereinafter referred to as the "Executive")

     WHEREAS the parties hereto are presently governed by a Personal Employment
Agreement with an effective date of December 31, 1991, and Amendments to the
Personal Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1992 and January 1, 1995
(collectively referred to as the "Agreements");

     AND WHEREAS the parties hereto desire to amend the terms of the Agreement
in accordance with the provisions hereof;

     NOW THEREFORE be it agreed as follows:

     2.       REMUNERATION
              ------------
              The provisions of subparagraph 5.1 of the said Personal Employment
              Agreement shall be amended by Increasing the salary from One
              Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) per annum to One Hundred
              and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) per annum payable in
              equal monthly installments not in advance.

WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE SIGNED HEREIN BELOW

GRANITE REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD.            EXECUTIVE



Per: ____________________________________            Per: ____________________







                                       61
'-0 °'

OJ ' 0 

,o 

N 

,-! 

I 

w 

>-

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111904 

10P SEC~ET 

~ATIONAL. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON• D,C. 

THE NRO STAFF February· 19, 

-MEMORANDUM FO~~------~IOASD/SA 

. SUBJECT: - OSD Management of Intelligence Programs 

This responds to your memorandum, BYE 77871-69, dated 

February 12, 1969. 

We disagree completely with your thought that the management of the National Reconnaissance Program requires, or would 

be enhanced by, "normalization. 11 

Preliminaries to this notion were first advanced by ~-----~ 

: in. BYE 5511-66, dated August 30, 1966, After discussion with Sec-

•· retary Vance, Dr. Flax replied in BYE 52621-66, dated October 31, ',, . ,,,--

• 

:; 1966. When Secretary Nitze replaced Mr. Vance, a formal proposal -·- ·~ 

'.; for "normalization" was advanced {se9 JBYE 70011-68, .'"•.,. 

· dated April 23, 1968} and, after discussions with Dr.lax, Secretary~ 

Nitze disapproved the proposal in BYE 78176-68, dated July 6, 1968. 

Our position with respect to your current version of these earlier : 

proposals for "normalizing" the NRO is identical to that expressed in v 

the previous re'plies to Dr. Enthoven. 

,I 

Since your proposal .discusses the applicability of the Target .. Oriented Display as a management device, you should also refer to 

Dr. Flax's memorandum to Secret'ary Nitze, BYE 13146-68, dated 

June 18, 1968, which poiμtlj:I out the weaknesses of the TOD as well 

as the dangers of using it as an analytical to'ql for the National Reconnaissance Program. 

2. 

' i 

! 

I 

CD __ _ • WORTHM 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CIIIITMIIL SYSTEM 

'' 

TOP SECRET 

Colonel, USAF 

Deputy Director 

I, ' 1 · UC:LUHII noM AUTOMATIC: ·uGRA01NCI . 

C:OHTROLHO BYE 12608-69 

co,., (f o, ___ c:o,iu 

rAH 1 o, 1 PAHS 

11 , '. j 11011 DIUC'IIVE HOO, IO DOU NOT A,,LY 

·----•··- ----·--•--1---- -------- _______ ;__ ... 9t:J ;2 ~19-~~()0 7 ·-·--

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111904
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN15-4-000]


Maxim Power Corporation, Maxim Power (USA), Inc.; Maxim Power 
(USA) Holding Company Inc.; Pawtucket Power Holding Co., LLC; 
Pittsfield Generating Company, LP; Kyle Mitton; Notice of Designation 
of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

    With respect to an order issued by the Commission on February 2, 
2015 in the above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, 
the staff of the Office of Enforcement are designated as non-decisional 
in deliberations by the Commission in this docket. Accordingly, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2014), they will not serve as advisors to 
the Commission or take part in the Commission's review of any offer of 
settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 
385.2201 (2014), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory 
staff concerning any deliberations in this docket.
    Exceptions to this designation as non-decisional are:

Larry Gasteiger
Sean Collins
Gabriel S. Sterling
Nicole Brisker
Emily Scruggs
Eric Ciccoretti
Jeremy Larrieu
Christopher Onisick


     Dated: February 2, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02430 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
,. f\ -s HAN01 F lo'IA 

,: 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114440. 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

cownoL SYSTEM /i NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

DOIUAN HANDLE' VlA. 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

3 February 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR 

SUBJECT: SS-3 Roles and Responsibilities 

Per your request, a SS-3 charter would read on this 

order: 

I. Responsible to the DNRO for NRP: 

SECURITY: 

v A. Provides guidance to the DNRO on security matters: 

1. As requested by him. 

2. As required by circumstances and events. 

B. Reports status of security to DNRO: 

1. Staff visits to program offices. i 

/ 

2. Evaluates program security 

3. As result of incident/compromise 

C. Implements DCI policy for security: 

1. Insures uniformity of stated policy. 

2. Recommends changes in existing policy as 

required by time and events. 

3. Originates requests for new policy from DCI. 

D, Focal point for investigative resources available 

to NRO. 

1. Coordinates interprogram investigations. 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM .-.urOMATIC REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIVE 52:00 10 00[5 NOT APPi Y 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114440 

CONTROL •a~I=N~T~E=R=N~A_L __ COPY ___ oF ___ cor1rs 

PAGE_~_QF ________ 2 ___ PAGES 
DO H040L£ VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONHIOL 1-VITfM 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114440 

TOP SECRET 

2, Interface for personnel investigation. 

3. Initiates special investigations. 

E, NRO interface for security aspects of NRP with 

DOD and other government agencies. 

1. Insures NRO interests are protected. 

BYEMAN 

2. Shapes other agencies policies to coincide with 

NRO goals. 

3. Provides cover support as required. 

F. Staffs plans and covers for DNRO affecting security. 

G. Attempts to anticipate those matters that could have 

an adverse effect on the NRP and plan suitable counteractions. 

II. As a Staff Function: 

A. Administer staff security guidance and services 

including: 

1. Clearance actions. 

2. Classification. 

3. Staff security policy. 

4. Visit requests. 

III. Represents program A security as requested/required 

(due to the fact thaL they are the only program element 

not otherwise represented in Washington). In this case 

the staff functions under SAFSP guidance. 

IV. Provides to Deputy Director, MOL the same basic 

services and policies as to NRO program elements. 

0 

DD. ROSE 

Captain, USAF 

Dep Asst for Security 

NRO Staff 

co,r,o, •o~l=N~T~E~R=N_A_L __ 

TOP SEeRET ,xcLUO(O 1Jlt0M A.UT01111.a.11c FU.1."it,,Do,:,;. 

COPY ___ OF ___ COP!ES 

PAG~. 2 or_,2_____1",das 

000 DI" lr.CTJV [ U. 00 l O OOU, 11(01 A ~fl'L V 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114440
#### Blackledge *v.*Simpson.

When to a bill filed, stating errors in .\n account settled four or five years ago, Defendant pleaded specially, denying each error and also all fraud, if the Plaintiff does not take issue, and prove the error or fraud, the court will not disturb the account.

This was a bill stating errors in an account settled between the Plaiuflff and Defendant some four or five years ago, particularizing the errors, and praying to have them rectified. The Defendant pleaded specially and particularly to each error assigned, that there was no such error as was assigned, and denied the fraud aud imposition charged in the bill, both in his plea and answer.

The plea was now argued, and after argument: *Per curiam*— Where a bill is for an account generally, then the plea of a stated account is a good plea in bar; for the account having been settled by the parties, the presumption is that it hath been fairly settled, and the court will not open it again merely because asked for by the party : but where the bill states a settled nccountarid errors in the account, and fraud or imposition in the settlement, then if the Defendant does not deny the error and fraud, the *299Plaintiff’s allegations remain unanswered, and the court will >peu the account as to the errors pointed out ; but if the plea denies the error and fraud, and the fraud be denied in the answer also, so that issue may be taken upon the error and fraud, the plea of a staled acccouut is a good bar in law. And if the Plaintiff doth not take issue, and prove the error and fraud, the court will not open the account in any manner; but if issue be taken upon these points, and found for the Plaintiff, then the court will order the account to be opened as to the errors complained of and proved — but the plea and answer must deny the error as positively as they are alleged, so that issue may be taken on these very points — for want of that particular, the plea would be ill — but here, it is full, and issue may he taken precisely and specially upon the errors and fraud, and therefore the plea is good and must be allowed; but the Plaintiff must still reply and take issue.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.



By:

/s/    GILBERT HUName: Title:

Gilbert Hu Chief Executive Officer