alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HALIFAX,

OCTOBER TERM, 1795.

#### State *v.*Job Garrigues.

If the jury, in a capital case, separate without returning a verdict, the prisoner shall not be tried again for that offence.

He had been indicted for murder, and put on his trial the last, day of last term, and the jury, after the court had gone from the bench, but without adjourning, separated without giving any verdict; and now ii vas moved by the Attorney-General that he might be again put upon *278bis trial, and In* cited *ICetyng*42, 52. *Foster*27, 29, 76. *H. H. P. C.*294, 295. *E contra*were riled *II P. C.*Yerbo *verdict, c.*47, s. *1. p.*439. where it is said to have been held for law ever since 1he Revolution, that a jury cannot be discharged in a capital case without giving a verdict.

*Per curiam*

The rule as laid down in 3 *Co. Inst.*110, and 1 *Inst.*227, is general and without .exception, that a jury in a capital ease cannot he discharged without giving a verdict; afterwards however, in,the reigns of the latter sovereigns of the *Stuart*family, a different rule prevailed,, that a jury in such case might he discharged for the purpose of ha vingbetter evidence against him at a future day *;*and this power was exercised for the benefit of the crown only : but it is a doctrine so abhorrent to every principle of safety and security, that it ought not to receive the least countenance in the courts of this country In the time of *James*the second, and since the Revolution, this doctrine came under examination, and the rule as laid down by *L.Coke*w as revived with this addition, that a jury should not be discharged in a capital case, unless for the benefit of the prisoner ; as if the prisoner be a woman and be taken in labour ; or if the prisoner after the jury are charged with him, be found to be insane, and the like ; or if at the prisoner’s request, a jury be withdrawn to let him in to take the benefit of an exception, which otherwise he would have lost, as in the case ol *Foster,*hi the present case, the jury were suffered by the court’s officer to separate without giving a verdict.; as they could not agree to convict, it is strong evidence of the. party’s innocence ; and perhaps he could not be tried again with the same advantage to himself as then. Perhaps his witnesses are dead, or gone away, or their attendance not to be procured, or some accident may prevent their attendance. We will not again put his life in jeopardy, more especially as it is very improbable we shall be able to possess him of the same advantages — So he was discharged.

*Note.—Vide*St*ate*v. *Spier,*1 *Dev. Rep.*491, in which this case is recognized and confirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
      officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating
      Partnership”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





(i)the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(ii)the
      information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Operating Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                August 3, 2007
            /s/
              Stanley K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant
.... ·······-····----------------- -· -·----·--···- ----- ·---- ---.- ...... ·---·- --- - -- ------ -- --------

~ 

' \ 

Lbu.P:I D I= UZt i\/L u0 t.d .( A-ff t:tkl s. 6t "'11:: l !}£ 

CAP i1o I 'STA·r ~ot~ 

i-?a. '60X \2308 

Au_sTI~J , 11:::----x-a:'; 1 01 n 

UeA:l2- 4-t iL!L.- > 

-=:L AM LDN~TACI i~t; 'it:~vuZ_ OF-'Fc.ct wi)A'{ -,D IZeG>uES-i < 

A<sS<STtl:MC£.. DtJ lEAr2JLL-uJ_ \ ----nrlc ~£tx~ DF ---rHt.. A~WE 

IV'lffillbtJE}) CAill.E uwvt£3.6~-S. · 

\.i{Jue_ A-'DScr;.(0t.JC£. w·l'rl.f. TJ-.1 tS Mhl ffi::"L- 1-S Vli£.EtCITl 't' 

A Pf' 0£LttJ?T£i) t 

-

S~Lt~dX~ . 

. ~ j? · ~.a fAA.JA/ 

-J6~ usA. as ::tt ~~gs;64 

gq9· l="/-JL ln3Z C.0Nr0L\U'1 UJJ'vf 

RECEI.VED IN 

COURT OF CRIMINAl APPEALS 

OCT 22 2015 

----------------· -------------- ----· -- ----------- ____________ . __ _ ____________ ----~ __ __ __ -------------~b~!~t~~ta, g~y~ ________ _
# C_2004262EN.01004801.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/48

---

Action brought on 27 July 2004 by Port Support Customs Rotterdam B.V. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-319/04)

(2004/C 262/90)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 27 July 2004 by Port Support Customs Rotterdam B.V., established in Rotterdam (Netherlands), represented by A.T.M. Jansen.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decision of 18 May 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision of 18 May 2004;

| — | order the defendant to make the information available to the applicant and to supply it with a copy of the requested documents. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to make the information available to the applicant and to supply it with a copy of the requested documents.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant requested access to the OLAF mission report on footwear and textile products from Cambodia. The applicant was granted only partial access to that report and therefore requested access to those parts of the report which had not been disclosed. The applicant was not granted such access.

In support of its application, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. (1) The applicant submits that the Commission failed to reply to its confirmatory application.

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

1

---
# C_2004185EN.01000101.xml

| 20.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 July 2004

(2004/C 185/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2412 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4357 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1975 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5264 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,13 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58240 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,181 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4260 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4193 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 949 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,8800 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,893 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 773 900 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6934 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6271 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6813 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8800 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1111 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3166 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2412

JPY

Japanese yen

134,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4357

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66360

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1975

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5264

ISK

Iceland króna

88,13

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58240

CZK

Czech koruna

31,181

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6623

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4260

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4193

ROL

Romanian leu

40 949

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,8800

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,893

TRL

Turkish lira

1 773 900

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6934

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6271

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6813

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8800

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1111

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,75

ZAR

South African rand

7,3166

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004300EN.01001402.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 21 October 2004

in Case C-426/02: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Charges having equivalent effect - Common commercial policy - Imports of goods from Member States and non-member countries - Charges levied for the validation of invoices)

(2004/C 300/28)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-426/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, lodged at the Court on 22 November 2002 by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: X. Lewis and M. Konstantinidis) against Hellenic Republic (Agents: A. Samoni-Rantou and N. Dafniou) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; Advocate General: A. Tizzano; Registrar: R. Grass, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by applying, for the benefit of the Ethnikos Organismos Farmakon (National Organisation for Medicines), a charge in respect of the validation of invoices on the import of raw materials for pharmaceutical use, semi-finished products and finished products from other Member States or non-member countries, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 23 EC, 25 EC and 133 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by applying, for the benefit of the Ethnikos Organismos Farmakon (National Organisation for Medicines), a charge in respect of the validation of invoices on the import of raw materials for pharmaceutical use, semi-finished products and finished products from other Member States or non-member countries, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 23 EC, 25 EC and 133 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.

1

---
# C_2005101EN.01000101.xml

| 27.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2005

(2005/C 101/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2981 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4489 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1453 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5418 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,46 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5821 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,247 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4298 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2054 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 183 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,61 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,695 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7662 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6661 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6112 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1235 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7831 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1384 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 296,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9119 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7437 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 572,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,933 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,519 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,0350 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,257 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2981

JPY

Japanese yen

137,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4489

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1453

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5418

ISK

Iceland króna

82,46

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5821

CZK

Czech koruna

30,247

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4298

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2054

ROL

Romanian leu

36 183

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,61

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,695

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7662

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6661

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6112

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1235

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7831

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1384

KRW

South Korean won

1 296,54

ZAR

South African rand

7,9119

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7437

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 572,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,933

PHP

Philippine peso

70,519

RUB

Russian rouble

36,0350

THB

Thai baht

51,257

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,744,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,874,383
<PP&E>                                         480,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,417,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,172,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,417,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,779
<CGS>                                          110,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,633,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,390,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,390,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,390,037)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.32)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT


         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 12, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Theodore D. Gelman, an
individual (the "LENDER").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and the Lender executed a Loan
and Pledge Agreement dated as of January 18, 2001 in the amount of Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT");

         WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the Company and the Lender executed that
certain First Amendment to Loan and Pledge Agreement to clarify certain
provisions; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to further amend and modify
the Loan Agreement to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Promissory
Note (the "NOTE") and, to reflect the new maturity date of the Note, the Company
and the Lender agree to cross out the old maturity date, February 14, 2001, from
the fifth paragraph on the first page of the Note, to write in the new maturity
date of April 12, 2001 beside the crossed-out old maturity date, and to sign the
Note by the new maturity date to evidence the agreement of the parties in
amending the maturity date of the Note;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Amendment to the Loan Agreement. Section 1.3 of the Loan
Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:

                  "1.3     Repayment. The outstanding principal and interest is
         payable no later than April 12, 2001 at which time all of the
         outstanding and unpaid principal and interest shall be due and payable
         (the "MATURITY DATE"). All payments of principal and interest shall be
         made in U.S. Dollars."

         2.       Non-Modification. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and shall remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the date first above written.

                                     WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.,
                                      as Borrower

                                     By:  /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer


                                         /s/ Theodore D. Gelman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Theodore D. Gelman, as Lender
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 21

 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for en 
    bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval for ``midnight 
                    rules'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Collins of 
    Georgia, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Marino, Mr. Harris, Mr. Griffith, Mr. 
Ratcliffe, Mr. Jenkins of West Virginia, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Gowdy, 
 Mr. Peterson, and Mrs. Hartzler) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
 Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for en 
    bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval for ``midnight 
                    rules'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EN BLOC CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF DISAPPROVAL PERTAINING 
              TO ``MIDNIGHT RULES''.

    (a) In General.--Section 801(d) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) In applying section 802 to rules described under paragraph 
(1), a joint resolution of disapproval may contain one or more such 
rules if the report under subsection (a)(1)(A) for each such rule was 
submitted during the final year of a President's term.''.
    (b) Text of Resolving Clause.--Section 802(a) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``resolving clause of which is'' the 
        following: ``(except as otherwise provided in this 
        subsection)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of a 
        joint resolution under section 801(d)(4), the matter after the 
        resolving clause of such resolution shall be as follows: `That 
        Congress disapproves the following rules: the rule submitted by 
        the __ relating to __; and the rule submitted by the __ 
        relating to __. Such rules shall have no force or effect.' (The 
        blank spaces being appropriately filled in and additional 
        clauses describing additional rules to be included as 
        necessary)''.
                                 <all>
```
( Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05107537 

lur~~ \ CONTROL SYSTEM 

4 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1400023796D 

THE NRO STAFF 8 October 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL WORTHMAN (SS-5) 

SUBJECT: Background Information 

Mr. Nate Fitts, the Targeted Oriented Display (TOD) focal 

point within the National Intelligence Program Evaluation (NIPE) staff, 

was shocked to learn of the misuse of the data provided the DIA. DIA 

does not have, as reported, a final copy of the TOD report; they have 

an unofficial copy of a first draft of a report to Mr. Nitze, summarizing 

the results of NIPEl s efforts in making meaningful analysis of the TOD 

data. The copy was furnished for use by General Carroll and Admiral 

Showers. Mr. Fitts thought the DIA completely out of line and advised 

Captain Farbian, the DIA TOD interface with NIPE. Captain Farbian 

expressed his embarrassment and offered his apologies. 

Mr. Fitts recommended no cost data be furnished the DIA. He 

suggested that without cost data the complete EMPAC management 

concept will wither and die. Mr. Fitts identified the EMPAC management scheme as bureaucratic and cumbersome in comparison to the 

streamlined TOD scheme of placing a price tag on exploitable intelligence. 

Mr. Fitts said he would like to make arrangements at an early 

date with the NRO TOD focal point to aggressively pursue the second 

phase of the TOD. The apparent purpose of the second phase will be a 

definition of terms which will permit the intelligence community to talk 

to one another. The organizations which submitted the TOD data to the 

NIPE used terminology which was organization-peculiar and not community-wide accepted. Mr. Fitts is presently having fits making rhyme 

or reason out of the mountains of data he presently has. 

EDWIN F. SWEENEY 

Colonel, USAF 

Attachment 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Proposed letter to DIA 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 52DO.l0 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05107537 

CONTROL NO'--.::In==-:t:...;:e:...;:r:.:n:.:.;a:::.::..l __ 

COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

PAGE._-'l"--_OF_----"l_ PAGES 

t 

I 

-!