alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Operating
     Partnership  for the  quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")
     fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated: August 13, 2003        /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
       ---------------        --------------------------------------------
                              Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                              Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust
                              Sole General Partner of the Registrant
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

215)IV-C-182 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:03 AM Sheet 215 of 232 
P.2 

'UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NOV ) 8 1991 

Honorable Patrick J. Leahy 

Chairman, Gommittee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry 

United States Senate 

Washington, D.C. 20510-6000 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

This is in response to your letter dated September 15, 1991 

to EPA regarding regulations for onboard refueling vapor 

recovery systems. Your letter enclosed a copy of a letter from 

your constituent, Mr. Roland Robinson, expressing concern that 

EPA does not intend to follow through on the rulemaking as 

required. We appreciate their interest in his rulemaking. 

EPA is proceeding with the rulemaking process for onboard 

controls as required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990-. 

As part of this process, Congress directed the EPA to consult 

with the Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding onboard 

system safety. This consultation is well underway. The 

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which 

is part of the DOT, released a study of onboard system safety 

in July 1991. We are reviewing this study and have placed a 

copy in the public docket for this rulemaking. We also held a 

public hearing on September 26th and 27th in order to solicit 

comments on this issue. Written comments were accepted through 

October 27th. We are in the process of making the final 

determination on how to proceed with the rule based on DOT'S 

conclusions regarding safety risks of onboard systems and on 

the record developed during the comment period. 

Thank you for your concern in this matter. Your letters 

will be included in the public docket. Please feel free to 

contact me if you require any additional information. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

oirunon n WII.SP*' 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Public Docket A-87-11 

SDSB:Barba:Connell:2565 Plymouth Rd.:X515:ll/04/91:Leahy 

Last Reviewed by Charles Gray:11/04/91 Control No. AL914346 

Reviewed by DZinger:BJR:X7645:AR-455:ll/06/91:Wang No. 2611T 

CONCURRENCES 

SURNAME }| J^JJJZ ) 

DATE ) \\-\<SA\ 

••«•••*•••#•*•*••>••«•*••••••«•*•• • <••*•• • 

EPA Form 1320-1A (1/90) Printed on Recycled Paper OFFICIAL FILE COPY
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00340-CR

Mark Meru

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-CR-3765-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 26, 2016
# C_2004248EN.01001402.xml

| 7.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3559 — FINMECCANICA/AUGUSTA-WESTLAND)

(2004/C 248/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3559. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3559. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
# CA2005007EN.01000101.xml

| 11.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 7/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 7/1

---

NOTICE TO READER

Image

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Aetna Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-07169 on Form S-3, No. 333-08427 on Form S-8, No. 333-08429 on Form S-8, No.
333-08431 on Form S-8, No. 333-68881 on Form S-8, No. 333-52321 on Form S-3, No.
333-52321-01 on Form S-3, No. 333-52321-02 on Form S-3, No. 333-52321-03 on Form
S-3, No. 333-52321-04 on Form S-3 and No. 333-52321-05 on Form S-3) of Aetna
Inc. of our reports dated February 3, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Aetna Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows
and related schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1998, which reports appear in or are incorporated by reference in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Aetna Inc.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
February 26, 1999
Ex. 99.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Peter R. Goodfellow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stelmar Shipping Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 16, 2003


/s/ Peter R. Goodfellow
------------------------
Peter R. Goodfellow
Chief Executive Officer

02509.0004 #409600
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards


### Document

Number: 

# 67 ) VI-B-1 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:38 PM Sheet 67 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-1 8 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-D-33 2 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t officer . I t

wa s incorrectl y categoriz eoriginally .



## 1
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Cable Insulation Resistance Measurements Made During Cable Fire Tests (NUREG/CR-6776, SAND2002-0447P)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6776 (PDF - 5.6 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2002****Date Published:****June 2002

**Prepared by:**Francis J. Wyant and Steven P. Nowlen

Sandia National LaboratoriesP.O. Box 5800Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0744Operated by Sandia Corporation

H.W. Woods, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Risk Analysis and ApplicationsOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6037

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An insulation resistance diagnostic system was recently developed and exercised during a series of cable fire tests sponsored by the commercial U.S. nuclear industry. This insulation resistance measurement system was able to identify and quantify the changes in insulation resistance occurring between the separate conductors and the conductors to ground in cable bundles as they were being exposed to fires. Eighteen separate fire tests were conducted during the period January through May 2001 and included a variety of cable and fire exposure conditions. The insulation resistance measurement system was operated at a 120 VAC input to the conductors for 14 of those test runs and at 100 VDC input for three of the runs. One test was run with the insulation resistance measurement system providing 24 VDC to two separate instrument cables being exposed to the fire. The results obtained by the insulation resistance measurement system during these tests showed that cables will fail during a fire in one of three ways: by internal shorting of the conductors in a multiconductor cable, by shorting of the conductors in different cables bundled together, or by individual conductors shorting to ground. No incidents of fire-induced open circuits were found to have occurred during any of these tests. A mockup of a simple 4 to 20 mA DC current loop instrument circuit was included in six of the later tests. The intent was to investigate the potential of misleading or loss of instrument indication from fire damage to the signal cable. This report provides an analysis of the insulation resistance data and current loop results for the 18 tests run in the industry test program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# National Agroforestry Center

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Land 
-  Forestry 
-  National Agroforestry Center 

The USDA National Agroforestry Center (NAC) had its origins in the 1990 Farm Bill.

 It began as a Forest Service Research  and State & Private Forestry effort in 1992 and expanded into a partnership with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in 1995. NAC offices are located in Lincoln, Nebraska and Washington, D.C.

NAC accelerates the application of agroforestry through a national network of partners. Together, we conduct research, develop technologies and tools, coordinate demonstrations and training, and provide useful information to natural resource professionals.
# Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) (7/2021) Standard Document(115.03 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) Overview(351.27 KB)

Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) CPPE(25.29 KB)

Roof Runoff Structure (No.) (558) Network Effects Diagram(85.88 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2005082EN.01004601.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/46

---

(2005/C 82/80)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 69, 19.3.2005

OJ C 69, 19.3.2005

Past publications

OJ C 57, 5.3.2005

OJ C 45, 19.2.2005

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
July 31, 1997


Mr. Larry Kopald
THINK New Ideas, Inc.
8000 Sunset Boulevard, Penthouse East
Los Angeles, California 90046

         Re:      Employment
                  ----------

Dear Mr. Kopald:

         This is to confirm the agreement reached as of May 31, 1997 between you
and THINK New Ideas,  Inc. (the "Company")  relating to your employment with the
Company as of such date.  The material terms of your agreement with the Company,
to be embodied in a written employment  agreement,  to be executed no later than
August 31, 1997, and substantially in the form attached hereto, are as follows:

         1.       TERM:  Two years

         2.       TITLE:  Chief Creative Officer; President of The Mednick Group

         3.       COMPENSATION:  Year 1: $300,000; Year 2: $350,000.

         4.       ORACLE  ACCOUNT BONUS:  Year 1: up to $150,000;  Year 2: up to
                  $100,000   (based  upon  Oracle   entering   one-to-two   year
                  advertising services agreement).

         5.       PROFITABILITY BONUS: Year one: Ten percent (10%) of profits on
                  billings  on the  Oracle  Account  in  excess  of $16  million
                  dollars;  Year 2: Ten percent  (10%) of profits on billings on
                  the Oracle Account in excess of $20 million dollars.

         6.       OPTIONS:  250,000  shares of common stock at an exercise price
                  of $3.69 per share  exercisable in equal  increments over four
                  years,  subject to acceleration in year one and year two based
                  on the Company's gross billings of $20 million in year one and
                  $30 million in year two and a realized  profit margin,  before
                  taxes,  of eight percent (8%) in year one and fifteen  percent
                  (15%) in year two.


<PAGE>

Mr. Larry Kopald
August 1, 1997
Page 2




If the foregoing  reflects your  understanding of the agreement we have reached,
please counter-execute below where indicated to confirm such understanding.


                                  Very truly yours,


                                  /s/ Scott A. Mednick
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Scott A. Mednick
                                  Chief Executive Officer




                                  Agreed    to   and
                                  Accepted this 1st day of August, 1997:

                                  /s/ Larry Kopald
                                  -------------------------
                                  Larry Kopald

Enclosure

cc: Victoria A. Baylin, Esq.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT YORDY JESUS GR

ADOS-HINOJOSA, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-74096 Age n c y No. A088-735-064 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B YB EE, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Yordy Je sus Gra dos-Hinojosa , a native and c itiz e n of Pe ru, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture



# FIL ED OCT 20 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184- 85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Gra dos-Hinojosa

doe s not c ha lle nge the B IA’ s finding tha t he wa ive d a

ny c ha lle nge to the IJ’ s dispositive de te rm i nation tha

t his a sy lum

c la im wa s untim e ly . Se e Martine

z-Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th C i r. 1996) (issue s not supporte d by argum e n t

are de e m e d a

ba ndone d). Thus, wede ny

the pe tition a s to Gra dos-Hinojosa ’ s a sy lum c la im . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s finding tha

t Gra dos-Hinojosa

did not e sta blish pa st pe rse c ution, or tha t it is more like ly

tha n not he will be pe rse c ute d in thefuture , on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground if re t

urne d to Pe ru. Se e Parussimov

a v . Muk ase y , 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th C ir. 2009) (theREAL ID Ac t

“ re quire s tha

t a prote c te d ground repre se nt ‘ one c e ntra l re a son’ for an a sy lum a pplic ant’ s pe rse c ution” ); se ealso Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (pe titione r’ s “ de s ire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by

c rim ina ls m otiva

te d by the ft or ra ndom viole nc e by

ga ng m e m be rs be ars no ne xus to a

prote c te d ground” ). Thus, we de ny the pe tition a s to Gra dos-Hinojosa ’ s withholding of re m ova l c la im . Fina lly , Gra dos-Hinojosa doe s not ra ise any

argum e nts c h a lle nging the

1 2 - 7 4 0 9 6 2a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C A T re lie f. Se e Martine z-Se rrano , 94 F.3d a

t 1259. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 4 0 9 6 3
*November 9, 1938.*

#### Yessa and others, Respondents, vs. Nuxoll and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Bird, Smith, Okoneski & Puchner*of Wausau.

For the respondents : *Regner ■& Krueger*of Wausau.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# CA2004280EN.01000101.xml

| 17.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 280/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
# C_2005082EN.01000502.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-125/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'arbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages): Guy Denuit, Betty Cordenier v Transorient – Mosaïque Voyages and Culture SA (1)

1

(Questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Reference to the Court - National court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 EC - Arbitration panel)

(2005/C 82/10)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-125/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Collège d'arbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages (Belgium), made by decision of 4 December 2003, received at the Court on 8 March 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Guy Denuit, Betty Cordenier and Transorient – Mosaïque Voyages and Culture SA – the Court (Fourth Chamber) composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The Court is not competent to rule on questions referred to it by the College d'àrbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Court is not competent to rule on questions referred to it by the College d'àrbitrage de la Commission de Litiges Voyages.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 12.06.2004.

1

---