alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.11

                         CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO
                   CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF PREFERENCES
                    AND RIGHTS OF THE SERIES A CONVERTIBLE
                            PIK PREFERRED STOCK OF
                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

     (Pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of Delaware)



     The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

     FIRST:    The name of the corporation is The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
(the "Company").

     SECOND:   A Certificate of Designation of Preferences and Rights of the
Series A Convertible PIK Preferred Stock of The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
(the "Certificate of Designation"), was filed in the Office of the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware on January 26, 1998, and said Certificate
requires correction as permitted by subsection (f) of Section 103 of the General
Corporation Law of the state of Delaware.

     THIRD:    The inaccuracy or defect of such Certificate of Designation is
that said Certificate of Designation omitted reference to the number of shares
of preferred stock that had been designated by resolution of the Board of
Directors as shares of Series A Convertible PIK Preferred Stock, as required by
subsection (g) of Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     FOURTH:   The Certificate of Designation shall be corrected to state that,
pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Directors by the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company, the Board of Directors designated by resolution
250,000 shares of the authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock of the
Company as Series A Convertible PIK Preferred Stock of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, has caused this certificate to be signed by Arthur J. Bacci, its
President, this 17/th/ day of August, 1999.


                              THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


                              By: /s/ Arthur J. Bacci
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                      Arthur J. Bacci
                                      President
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2091 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7- 

year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2017 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the 7-year recovery period for motorsports 

entertainment complexes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2091 IH

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD FOR MOTORSPORTS EN2 TERTAINMENT COMPLEXES MADE PERMA3 NENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara6 graph (D). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

9 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 20, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Vance Vinar, Sr., Vance Vinar, Jr., Kaylin Vinar, Jared Vinar, Joey Vinar, Chad Wolff, and Courtney Wolff,*                     all of Faribault, Minnesota, as a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of Reliance Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Reliance Bank, both in Faribault, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02289 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             286
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,504
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,911
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,965
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,011
<LOANS>                                         23,340
<ALLOWANCE>                                        131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,987
<DEPOSITS>                                      18,242
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                446
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,562
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  47,987
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    521
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  315
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   836
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 231
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 231
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              605
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        5
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    257
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   126
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  131
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            131
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          $ 1,067
<SECURITIES>                     27,054
<RECEIVABLES>                    38,821
<ALLOWANCES>                     (1,273)
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                               40
<DEPRECIATION>                      (37)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   66,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               158
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       65,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     66,064
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,256
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     58
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,198
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,198
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.00
        

</TABLE>
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Well Decommissioning (Code 351) 

The sealing and permanent clsoure of an inactive,

abandoned, or unusable water or monitoring well. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to any cased or noncased water well

or monitoring well selected for decommissioning. 

This practice requires the removal of all pumping

equipment, valves, pipelines, liners, debris, and other

foreign material. The well casing should be removed if possible. If some or all of the equipment and

casing resists removal by pulling or overdrilling, the casing must be ripped, perforated or cut off a

minimum 2.0 feet below ground surface. Once the well is cleared, disinfect the well with a minimjum

chlorine solution centration of 50 mg/L (50 parts per million), or the minimum chlorine solution

concentration specified by the regulating authority, whichever one is greater. The well is sealed as

allowable by ASTM D5299 and State regulations. 

Common Associated Practices 

Well Decommissioning is used in a Conservation Management System with Critical Area Planting

(342) and other conservation practices to enhance and protect water quality. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2004179EN.01001302.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Action brought on 3 May 2004 by Hippocrate Vounakis against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-165/04)

(2004/C 179/26)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 3 May 2004 by Hippocrate Vounakis, residing at Wezembeek-Oppem (Belgium), represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision establishing his career development review for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision establishing his career development review for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant contests, on formal and substantive grounds, his career development review for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002.

In support of his claims, he asserts:

| — | infringement of Article 2 of the General Provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations. The applicant states in that regard that the review in question was established by a person lacking the power to do so; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 2 of the General Provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations. The applicant states in that regard that the review in question was established by a person lacking the power to do so;

| — | the existence, in this case, of a manifest error of assessment, and inconsistency between the comments and the marks awarded; |
| --- | --- |

—

the existence, in this case, of a manifest error of assessment, and inconsistency between the comments and the marks awarded;

| — | infringement of the duty to state reasons. The applicant asserts on that point that the overall mark awarded him places him below the average, despite the fact that his previous reviews were good, without any explanation for the deterioration. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of the duty to state reasons. The applicant asserts on that point that the overall mark awarded him places him below the average, despite the fact that his previous reviews were good, without any explanation for the deterioration.

---
# C_2004179EN.01000302.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/3

---

Action brought on 22 April 2004 by the Hellenic Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-189/04)

(2004/C 179/06)

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought on 22 April 2004 before the Court of Justice of the European Communities by the Hellenic Republic, represented by Panayiotis Milonopoulos, legal adviser of the Community law section of the special legal service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and by Vasilios Kiriazopoulos, of the State legal service, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Greek Embassy, 27 Rue Marie-Adelaide.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare void the offsetting by the Commission of the European Communities of the amount of EUR 565,656.80 (participation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the construction of a common European Union diplomatic representation in Abouja, Nigeria) included in the total amount of offset of EUR 1,653,298.54 from the amount made available to Greece in the context of the relevant support programme. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare void the offsetting by the Commission of the European Communities of the amount of EUR 565,656.80 (participation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the construction of a common European Union diplomatic representation in Abouja, Nigeria) included in the total amount of offset of EUR 1,653,298.54 from the amount made available to Greece in the context of the relevant support programme.

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas and main arguments

The Hellenic Republic maintains that the Commission did not pay due heed to the fact that the Additional memorandum of understanding was not ratified by Hellenic Republic and applies without the participation of the Hellenic Republic in the Abouja II project.

Nor was sufficient credence paid by the defendant to the substantive acknowledgement by the Hellenic Republic of its debts arising out of its participation in the Abouja I project.

In that connection the Hellenic Republic maintains that the Commission of the European Communities infringed the principles governing collection of amounts and the provision, clearance and confirmation of liabilities, as well as the principles governing collection by means of offsetting.

In light of the foregoing the Hellenic Republic maintains that by issuing the offsetting notice the Commission infringed substantive provisions of law, that is to say, on the one hand, the provisions of Regulation No 3342/02 and, on the other, the provisions of Article 15 of the initial memorandum of understanding.

---
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111703 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14 00078186D 

June 23, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Platinum 

~------~ 

alled on Wednesday, June 18 and stated that 

the delivery of the platinum to GSA would be accomplished at 

1030 on July 8. I called I ~o reconfirm the time 

and date and to similarly confirm the place of delivery. Mr. 

I stated that it was going back to the depot in New Jersey. 

~I~t~o~l~d~l __ r-----~lthat the shipment should go to the assay office 

discussion, I toldl I that the platinum delivery inin New York via tre ;en: in Nem Jersey. After a few moments of 

structions were on t e s ipping orders I had sent to him previously. 

On Monday, June 23 I called~-----~to reconfirm the 

date, place and time of delivery. He stated that all was in order 

and requested that I furnish to him a contact and the identification 

number of the person who would accept delivery. I called Mr. 

GSA, and informed him of the delivery schedule. I requested identification of the receivers of the shipment and he 

promised to provide them. I told~~~--~that I would confirm 

the date, place and time to him in writing. 

JO 

Ca 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111703
#### Pracki, Appellant, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Cannon & Fox*and *A. W. Richter,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen,*attorneys, and *F. H. Prosser*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Conservation Crop Rotation, Cover Crop, Firebreak, Herbaceous Weed Control, Herbaceous Wind Barriers, Integrated Pest Management, Mulching, Residue and Tillage Management-Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management-No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management-Ridge Till, Residue Management, Seasonal, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1490 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 59 ) IV-C-3

2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:47

AM Sheet 59of 273P. 2 

### A-94-5 2 IV-C-3 2

Origina l Messag e From : <Barnett.KeithSepamail.epa.gov > To : <keegan@glascraft.com> ; <tomh@magind.com > Sent : Thursday , Augus t 01 , 200 2 1:4 8 P M Subject : Definitio no f nonatomize d spra y EP AAI H DCX;; U
Gentlemen : I hav e attache d th e curren t definitio n o f nonatomize d spra yequipmen t w e inten d t o us e i nth e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s NESHAP . Thi s definitio ni s base d o ncomment s submitte d byth e Composite s Fabricator s Associatio n(CFA ) o nth e propose d rule . Pleas e revie wth e definitio nan d respon d t o m e wit hanycomment s o r concerns . (Se e attache d file : Nonatomize d definition.wpd ) Not e tha t th e equatio nreferre d t o i n th e definitio n i s identica l t o th e nonatomize d resi no r nonatomize d ge l coa t Unifie d Emissio n Factor s publishe d b yth e CFA . Keit hW . Barnet t US/EP AOAQPS , ESD/MIC GC504-0 5 Researc hTriangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-560 5 barnett.keith@epa.go v
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS — NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021 

Vegetative Barrier (601)

Initial setting: All eroding areas including 

cropland, pastureland, rangeland, 

forestland, farmsteads, mined land, and 

construction sites requiring stabilization 

and water flow management

D.2 (+) Sediments trapped 

within the vegetative barrier

1. Appropriate permanent vegetative 

cover established on the contour or 

across concentrated flow areas

I.5 (-) Sheet and rill

erosion

D.1 (-) Flow rate of 

surface runoff water

D.4 (+) Stabilization 

of steep slopes 

D.6 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

I.6 (-) Turbidity in 

surface water runoff

I.4 (-) Surface 

water runoff 

I.1 (+) Infiltration of 

runoff water at the 

site

I.2 (+) Potential for 

transport of dissolved 

pollutants to 

ground waters

Nutrient 

Management (590)

Pest Management 

Conservation 

System (595)

I.7 (-) Nutrient and 

organics in surface water 

runoff

I.8 (+) Wildlife 

food and cover I.9 (+) Land 

productivity

I.10 (+) Improved 

productivity, health, 

and vigor

I.13 (+/-) Net 

return

I.12 (+/-) Potential 

income

C.1 (+) Surface water 

quality C.4 (+) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

communities)

C.3 (+) Biodiversity

D.5 (-) Area for 

agricultural 

production

C.2 (+) Aquatic 

habitat

I.3 (+/-) Ground water 

quality

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or 

a decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Start

I.11 (+) 

Soil health

D.3 (+) Permanent 

vegetative cover

Associated practice