alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc. (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2002

                                                     /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Floyd Warkol,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     of the Company
#### Union Trust Company, Administrator *de bonis non,*Appellant, vs. Wendt, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Field & Field*and *Nat P. Biart*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toe-baas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
EPA/DOT Fuel Standards for· Heavy Tl'ncks 

Hello. My name is Chris Johnson, and I live in Evanston, Illinois. During the summer of 

2012, l did a lot of bike riding, and I noticed that 1 \Vas constantly wheezing and 

coughing. 1 went to my doctor, who ordered pulmonary-function tests., and it turned out 

that my childhood asthma had returned I am far from alone in the Chicago area in 

suffering from asthma, as the quality of our city's air has grown progressi,·ely worse. In 

2014, the American Lung Association gave Chicago an F for its air quality. 

A major part of the problem with Chicago's air quality is the enormous amount of heavytruck traftic, \\ hich is found not only on the expressways but on major arteries such as 

Dempster Street, which is a block south of where I live. Heavy tntcks are major 

contributors ro air pollution, and they have been unregulated for far too long. They 

account for about I 0 percent of the miles driven in the United States, yet they produce 20 

percent of the transportation-related carbon emissions. Heavy trucks also account for rrJ. 0 

percent of the oil used by the U.S. transportation sector. 

r:or these health and economic reasons, I applaud the Environmental Protection Agency 

and the Department of Transportation for proposing to reduce trucks' fuel use and IO\\er 

their carbon emissions llO\.\>ever, I urge you to reduce new-truck fuel consumption e\ en 

more--by 40 percent by 2025, compared to 20 I 0 levels. ln 2009, the Department of 

Energy reported that the heavy-truck industry has or is developing the technology to meet 

higher mileage standards by improving engines. transmissions, and tires and by using 

more aerodynamic designs The industry can definitely meet higher standards 

Higher mileage standards for heavy trucks would have enormous benefits for everyone 

concerned. We would save 200,000 barrels of oil a day and avoid putting an additional 40 

million metric tons of global-wam1ing emissions into the atmosphere. This would be the 

equivalent of shutting clown 12 coal-pO\\ered plants. By 2025, the average big-rig driver 

would save $30,000 each year in fuel costs. Manufacturers would save on shipping costs 

and could pass those savi ngs along to consumers. Perhaps, most importantly, the United 

States would realize approximately $37 billion in health and welfare benefits. Thank you. 

Christopher R. Johnson 

32 Williamsburg Lane 

Evanston, IL 60203 

847/673-0317 

cjohnsonconsul ti ng@comcast.net
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001004317
<NAME> IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                             585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,098)
<INVENTORY>                                        920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,525
<PP&E>                                         193,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                (53,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,156
<BONDS>                                        241,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,647
<SALES>                                         88,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,739
<CGS>                                           45,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (196)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
형평성을

추구하는

우리의 결의

“

는 기관의 정책 및 관행 내에

서 프로그램, 서비스 및 기술 지원

을 제공하는 방식에서 공정성을 유

지함으로써 형평성을 제고하고 있

습니다.

” — NRCS 국장 테리 제이 코스비

집중된 형평성 구성 요소는 역사적으로 소외된 신규 및 기존 지역사회 기반 조직과 보전 아웃리치

를 통해 NRCS를 대신하여 지역사회 개발에 중요한 역할을 한 파트너를 지원합니다.

형평성과 공정성이 오랫동안 유지될 것인가는 인종과 관계없이 가장 큰 영향을 받는 지역사회의

자원의 효율적인 관리, 통제, 사용 및 접근성에 달려 있습니다.

형평성에 대한 질문이나 우려 사항이

있는 경우 형평성 디렉터 비비안 딕슨

씨에게 연락하십시오 

vivian.dickson@usda.gov.

프로그램 차별 불만은 www.usda.gov/

oascr 에서 제출하거나 ac@ascr.usda.gov.

로 이메일하십시오

USDA는 기회균등 제공자, 고용주 및 대출 기관입니다 nrcs.usda.gov
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActFOIA Guide

# Statements of policy which have been adopted by the agency and are not published in the Federal Register.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TREX MEDICAL CORPORATION'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                              5,881
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      61,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                        2,996
<INVENTORY>                                        68,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  155,465
<PP&E>                                             28,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                     12,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    286,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              66,551
<BONDS>                                               488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              341
<OTHER-SE>                                        210,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      286,330
<SALES>                                           188,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  188,253
<CGS>                                             140,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     140,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   22,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    1,326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (29,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (9,449)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (19,997)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (19,997)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.62)


</TABLE>
# C_2004320EN.01003101.xml

| 24.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/31

---

Corrigendum to the call for independent experts for the eTEN programme (2005-2006)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 283 of 20 November 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 283 of 20 November 2004

(2004/C 320/19)

Page 10. The text reads as follows:

‘DESCRIPTION

The Commission hereby invites applications from individuals wishing to provide expert assistance in the execution of tasks in relation with the eTEN Programme. eTEN is the European Community Programme designed to help the deployment of telecommunication networks based services (e-services) with a trans-European dimension. Further information about the eTEN Programme can be found on the eTEN website:

http://europa.eu.int/eten

The tasks to be executed consist of evaluating proposals submitted in response to calls for proposals and reviewing individual eTEN projects. They will take place between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2009.

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS

The call is open from the date of publication until 31 December 2006. Applicants wishing to act as experts in eTEN activities starting 1 January 2005 should apply by 15 December 2004.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

All applications must comply with the detailed specifications and conditions which are available on the Commission's internet site http://europa.eu.int/eten in English, French and German.’

---
Order entered February 2, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01426-CR

RICHARD THOMAS ALFANO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-83426-2015

ORDER

The Court has before it court reporter Susan Maienschein’s February 1, 2017 request for 

additional time to file the reporter’s record in this appeal. We GRANT the request and ORDER

the reporter’s record filed March 3, 2017.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 North Carolina - Fiscal Year 2024
# C_2004300EN.01005402.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/54

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-251/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 300/105)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 5 October 2004, the President of the Second Chamber, Extended Composition, of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-251/99, Texaco Nederland B.V. and Others v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 20 of 22.1.2000.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001004317
<NAME> IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          14,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,823)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,033
<PP&E>                                         293,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                (73,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,674
<BONDS>                                        429,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                     340,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,032
<SALES>                                        182,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,520
<CGS>                                           91,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    401
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     366
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (575)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
# C_2004239EN.01002202.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/22

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 June 2004

in Case T-188/03: Joëlle Hivonnet v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Officials - Education allowance - Criteria for grant - Primary schooling - Nursery school)

(2004/C 239/47)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-188/03: Joëlle Hivonnet, official of the Council of the European Union, residing in New York (United States of America), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Sims and F. Anton) – application for annulment of the decision of the Council refusing to grant the applicant the education allowance for her daughter for the nursery school years 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 and only granting that allowance on an exceptional basis for the nursery school year 2001/2002, and a claim for compensation seeking payment of default interest on the sums corresponding to those allowances and damages for the non-pecuniary damage suffered as a result of that decision – the Court of First Instance (Single Judge: N.J. Forwood); I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 2.8.2003.

1

---
#### Helme & others, *v.*Guy.

From Johnston.

Where a testator owned a large body of land, composed of several tracts, acquired at different times and known by different names, and living on one of the tracts known by a distinct name, devised in these words, “I give and bequeath to my sonW. H. G the tract of land *whereon I now*live, including the plantation together with all the *appurtenances*thereunto belonging,” it was held that he had devised to W. II. G. only the tract on which he lived; the word *appurtenances*comprehended only things in the nature of *incidents*to that tract. liad the testator said the *lands*on which he lived, the construction might have been different.

*petition for partition.*— The petitioners set forth that ■William Guy bad died seised of divers tracts of land, leaving the Defendant and the wife of the petitioner his only children and heirs at law ; and that by his last will, William Guy bad directed the said tracts to be equally, divided between the Defendant and the wife of the petitioner, and prayed a division.

*342The answer denied that the will had directed such a division of the lands, and the clause in question was in the following words:

“ Item — I give and bequeath to my son William Henry Guy, the tract of land *whereon I now live*including the plantation, together with all the *appurtenances*thereunto, belonging 5” after giving to his son several negroes, he thus proceeds, *“*the residue of my property to be equally divided between my son William Henry Guy and my daughter Ann Eliza He!me.”

It appeared that the testator ivas possessed of many tracts of land, acquired at different times and composing a large body, and lived on a tract which was called “ the Ben. Radcliffe tractmany of the other tracts had also names by which they wrere distinguished.

Seaw ERR, Judge,

delivered the opinion of a majority of the Court:

From all the circumstances of this case, it seems impossible to doubt about the meaning of the testator. He liad a large body of land composed of different tracts, and know'll by different names, the one he lived on was called the *“*Ben Radcliffe tract,” and he devises the *tract*on which *he lived*to his son William Henry, together with all the *appurtenances.*

Had lie said, *“*the lands,” on which lie lived, there might have been doubt *•,*but we are clear, that according to the manner in which lie *has*expressed himself, the devise extends no further than to that distinct *tract;*and the word *“*appurtenances” can have no other or greater meaning, than to comprehend things in the nature of *incidents*to this tract. There must be a decree for partition.
# L_2015283EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1939

of 9 October 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Latvia's application to register the name ‘Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Latvia's application to register the name ‘Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Latvijas lielie pelēkie zirņi’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 189, 6.6.2015, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Schultz, Respondent, vs. Parmentier, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Hannan, Johnson & Goldschmidt*of Milwaukee and *Whaley & Pmtlsen*of Racine.

For the respondent: *Kadmit & Lepp*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.