alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 D0 12 5

. SPECI AL HESTER v . LOGANVI LLE PR OPERTI ES KI , LLC d/ b/ a ALEXANDER CROSSI NG PDQ SERVI CES I NC.

I n t h i s d i sp o s s es s o ry act i o n , o n Oct o b er 1 6
, 2 0 23
, t h e M ag i s t rat e Co u rt o f
W al t o n Co u nt y en t ered an o rd er gran t i n g a wri t o f p o s s es s io n t o t h e p l ai n t i ff an d

ag ai n s t t h e d efen d an t Sp eci al Hes t er. O n Oct ob er 2 3
, 2 0 2 3
, Hes t er fi l ed t h i s
ap p li cat io n s eek i n g d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f t he m ag i s t rat e co u rt o rd er. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

“ [T] h e o n l y av en u e o f ap p eal av ai l ab l e fro m [a] m ag is trat e co u rt ju dg m en t i s
p ro v id ed b y OCGA § 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), wh ich al l o ws fo r a d e n o v o ap p eal to t h e s t at e

o r s u p eri o r co u rt .” T

a t e v. Ha b i

f
, 3 6 7 G a. A p p

. 4 3 5, 4 3 8 -4 3 9 (2 ) (8 8 6 SE2 d 3 8 9 ) (2 0 2 3) (p u n ct u at i on o m it t ed ). Th u s, t h i s Co u rt h as ju ri sd i ct i o n t o ad d res s an o rd er o f

t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt o n ly i f t h at o rd er h as b een rev iewed b y a s t at e o r s up eri o r co u rt

. See W es t wi n d Co r

p

. v. W a s h i n g t o n Fed

. S & L As s n

. , 1 95 Ga. Ap p. 4 1 1
, 4 1 1 (1 ) (3 9 3
SE2 d 4 7 9 ) (1 9 9 0 ); Ba ker v. G. T., Lt d

. , 1 9 4 Ga. Ap p

. 4 5 0
, 45 1 (3 ) (3 9 1 SE2 d 1 ) (1 9 9 0). Th e Geo rg i a Co n s t i t u t i o n , h o wev er, p ro v i d es th at “ [a] n y co u rt s hal l t ran s fer

t o t he ap p ro p ri at e co u rt i n t h e s t at e an y ci v i l cas e in wh ich i t d et erm i n e s t h at ju ri s d i ct i o n o r v en u e l i es el s ewh ere.” Ga. Co n st

. o f 1 9 8 3
, Art

. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII;
Bo s m a v. Gu n t er , 2 5 8 Ga. 66 4
, 6 6 5 (3 7 3 SE2 d 3 6 8 ) (1 9 8 8); acco rd Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 1 1 (b ). November 15, 2023Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap p li cat i o n i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p eri o r Co u rt

o f W al t o n Co u n t y

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/15/2023
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                       XIONICS DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, 1997 AND 1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               1998            1997           1996
                                                           ------------     -----------    -----------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>            <C>         
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares .........    ($16,251,533)    $   852,349    ($1,532,677)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
         Common stock .................................      11,830,541       9,948,607      1,517,674
         Assumed conversion of stock options ..........            --         2,132,380           --
                                                           ------------     -----------    -----------

                  Total shares ........................      11,830,541      12,080,987      1,517,674

         Net income (loss) per basic share ............    ($      1.37)    $      0.09    ($     1.01)
                                                           ============     ===========    ===========
         Net income (loss) per diluted share ..........    ($      1.37)    $      0.07    ($     1.01)
                                                           ============     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information extracted  from the
unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements  at  February  28,  1998  and  is
qualified in its entirety by refrence to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,945,436
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,357,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (264,337)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,861,124
<PP&E>                                          17,065,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,601,602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,847,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,809,515
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            32,495
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,016,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,847,049
<SALES>                                         19,255,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,255,448
<CGS>                                           10,300,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,300,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,746,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    55,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,092,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,097,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                       399,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                698,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       698,425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### THE STATE *vs.*EDWIN ROBBINS.

an indictment for sailing to a slave in the night time, it is not necessary to negativo an order of the owner or manager, the offence having been committed in the night time.

In such an indictment, the slave is sufficiently identified by his name ; a further description, by giving the name of the owner, is not necessary. The case of *The State*v. *Miller,*7 Ire. *725,*cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Edgecombe County, at the Spring Term 1849, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.

The defendant was tried and convicted upon the fol. lowing indictment, to-wit;

*357“State of Noetii Carolina, ) Superior Court of Law, Edgecombe County, y Fall Term, 1848.

1 “The jurors for the State, upon their oath, present, that Edwin Robbins, a licensed retailer of spirituous liquor, by a measure less than a quart, late of the County aforesaid, at and in said County, on the first day of September in the year eighteen hundred and forty-eight, and in the night time of said day, between the hours of sunset thereof and sunrise of the day next ensuing, to a slave, named Sampson, one pint of spirituous liquor unlawfully did sell and deliver, to the common nuisance of the good citizens of the State, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State.

(Signed,) MOORE, Atto. Gen’I.

On motion of the defendant, the judgment was arrested,, and the Attorney General appealed.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

No counsel for the defendant.

Pearson, J.

There is no ground, upon which the judgment ought to be arrested. On the contrary, the Attorney General has framed an indictment, unencumbered by useless words; which, from -its brevity and clearness, may well be adopted as a precedent.

The averment, that the defendant “unlawfully did sell and deliver” to the slave, would not be supported by proof of a sale and delivery to the slave as the agent and for and on account of his owner ; nor is it necessary to negative an order of the owner or manager, the offence having been committed in the night time. *State*v. *Miller,*7 Ired. 725, decides both points.

The slave is sufficiently described by his name. A further description, by giving the name of the owner, Í3 *358not necessary. The law only requires “certainty to a certain intent in general” in indictments for this offence.

The Court below erred in arresting the judgment. There must be a judgment for the State.

Per Curiam. Ordered to be certified accordingly.
# C_2005095EN.01000201.xml

| 20.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3445 — Microsoft/Time Warner/ContentGuard)

(2005/C 95/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 July 2004, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a concentration between Microsoft/Time Warner/ContentGuard. On 9 March 2005, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
#### Geisert and wife, Appellants, vs. Steiner and wife, Respondents.

For the appellants : *Morton, Jones & Barr*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *H. T. Ferguson*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court,*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Harry L. You, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    HARRY L. YOUHarry L. You Chief Financial Officer Dated: November 7, 2002
# C_2005045EN.01002701.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/27

---

Action brought on 10 December 2004 by Pergan GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-474/04)

(2005/C 45/59)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 December 2004 by Pergan GmbH, Bocholt (Germany), represented by M. Klusmann and F. Wiemer, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul Decision SG-Greffe (2004) D/204343 of 1 October 2004 in so far as the applicant's request for removal of all references to the applicant in the definitively published version of the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 imposing fines in Case COMP/E-2/37.857 – Organic Peroxides was refused; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul Decision SG-Greffe (2004) D/204343 of 1 October 2004 in so far as the applicant's request for removal of all references to the applicant in the definitively published version of the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 imposing fines in Case COMP/E-2/37.857 – Organic Peroxides was refused;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the contested decision, the Commission refused in part the applicant's request of 13 July 2004 for removal of all references to conduct of the applicant allegedly contrary to cartel law in the definitively published version of the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 imposing fines in Case COMP/E-2/37.857 – Organic Peroxides.

In support of its action, the applicant claims, first, that, under Article 21 of Regulation No 17/62, the published version of a decision imposing fines for an infringement may name only the participating undertakings. Since the applicant was not the addressee of the decision imposing fines, the Commission is prohibited from publishing its findings in respect of the applicant. Moreover, it was impermissible for the Commission to assume that a decision finding an infringement on the part of the applicant would be adopted. In the applicant's view, the Commission has no competence under Regulation No 17/92 to adopt such a decision and is unable to establish a legitimate interest in doing so. Finally, the applicant alleges infringement of the right to an effective legal remedy laid down in the first paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In that connection, the applicant argues that, although the Commission alleges that it is guilty of comprehensive breaches of cartel law, it omitted to address the decision imposing fines to it and thus restricted its ability to avail itself of a legal remedy.

---
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2278 

AN ACT 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal 

site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2278 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Disposal 

3 Reauthorization Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

6 Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2023’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘September 30, 2030’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2278 

AN ACT 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill 

to the disposal site in Mesa County, Colorado. Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating
# C_2005042EN.01000101.xml

| 18.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 February 2005

(2005/C 42/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3041 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,8 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6912 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1048 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5485 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 81,12 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,366 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5831 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,985 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4312 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0014 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 37 348 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,76 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,13 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7116 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6597 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6101 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1717 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8216 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1422 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7995 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3041

JPY

Japanese yen

137,8

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6912

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1048

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5485

ISK

Iceland króna

81,12

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,366

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5831

CZK

Czech koruna

29,985

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4312

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0014

ROL

Romanian leu

37 348

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,76

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,13

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7116

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6597

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6101

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1717

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8216

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1422

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,62

ZAR

South African rand

7,7995

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 8


                                  Subsidiaries

A.   ASE Test Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
     China, which has one subsidiary:

     (i) ASE Test (U.S.A.) Inc.

B.   ASE Test Holdings Ltd, a corporation organized under the laws of the
     Cayman Islands, and its majority owned subsidiary, ISE Labs, Inc., a
     corporation organized under the laws of the state of California, U.S.A.
     ISE Labs, Inc. has four subsidiaries:

     (i)  ISE Labs Hong Kong Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
          Hong Kong.

     (ii) ISE Labs Singapore Pte Limited, a corporation organized under the
          laws of Singapore.

     (iii) ISE Technology, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
          California.

     (iv) Digital Testing Services Inc., a corporation organized under the laws
          of California.

C.   ASE Test Finance Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
     Mauritius; and

D.   ASE Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws
     of Singapore, and its wholly owned subsidiary, ASE Electronics (M) Sdn
     Bhd, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Malaysia.
# C_2005070EN.01000101.xml

| 22.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 March 2005

(2005/C 70/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3199 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4476 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1371 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5516 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 77,49 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5834 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,144 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4324 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1267 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 367 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,895 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7768 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6751 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6001 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2947 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7867 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1524 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1141 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3199

JPY

Japanese yen

139,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4476

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69410

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1371

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5516

ISK

Iceland króna

77,49

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5834

CZK

Czech koruna

30,144

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4324

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1267

ROL

Romanian leu

36 367

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,895

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7768

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6751

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6001

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2947

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7867

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1524

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,91

ZAR

South African rand

8,1141

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2004201EN.01000101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Full Court)

of 22 June 2004

in Case C-42/01: Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities [(1)](#ntr1-C_2004201EN.01000101-E0001)

(Community control of concentrations between undertakings - Article 21(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - Protection by Member States of their legitimate interests - Competence of the Commission)

(2004/C 201/01)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published in the European Court Reports

In Case C-42/01: Portuguese Republic, (Agents: L.I. Fernandes and L. Duarte, assisted by M. Marques Mendes) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: P. Oliver and M. França) — application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2000) 3543 final-PT of 22 November 2000 in relation to a proceeding under Article 21 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (Case No COMP/M.2054 – Secil/Holderbank/Cimpor) — the Court (Full Court), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet and J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, Presidents of Chambers, A. La Pergola, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 June 2004, in which it:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2004201EN.01000101-E0001)  
[OJ C 108, 7.4.2001](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2001_108_R_TOC).

---
Exhibit
      32.2














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Point.360 ( the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
      the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














/s/
      Alan R. Steel


Alan
      R.
      Steel


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      24,
      2006