alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-. • ,'.;' :'-'~-~;'!j'Ape~~~ed for Release: 2020102167 co;i\;;,; ~'. '/$,,',, ' 

t TOP SECIH -

DIRECT R'S REP RT 

T THE 

RP EXECUTIVE C I EE 

CURRE T ST TUS REP RT 

FY 1971 BUD ET 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CDITIIL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

NOVEMBER 15, 1969 . 

JOP SEBRB 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115116 

GAMBIT 

EARPOP 

IDEALIST 

CORONA 

HEXAGON 

TAGIOARD 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115116 

I ur ~ l;,IIIU, I 

~ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C, 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL HITlM 

THE NRO STAFF November 18, 1969 

BYEMAN 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PACKARD 

MR, HELMS 

DR. DuBRIDGE 

SUBJECT: Preparation for ExCom Meeting of November 25, 1969 

The NRO has forwarded to you the regular financial report and 

issue sheets for the November 25 meeting. 

To aid the ExCom in making decisions on the program priorities 

and to establish overall funding levels, I believe that this more detailed report will be useful. Similar reports will be submitted in the 

future as necessary. 

Since the August 15 ExCom meeting, several severe budget 

restrictions have been imposed within the Department of Defense 

generally, notably in connection with the 703 exercise. I do not 

believe that the NRP, important as it is, can or should escape the 

serious scrutiny which all defense-related programs are now rece1vmg. The subject/issue papers which you have already received 

are drawn up in such a way that the ExCom can readily establish a 

program at any of the levels $1. 1B, $996M and $944M. 

To improve the ability of the NRO to carry , .cs job of developing 

and managing syst1c r. "· ·n,i.eh wi fulfill the int. , ,.. ~ce needs of the 

government witl" rea of assigned respon.s'':)i~ we have established an Analv-.~"' (., "up within the staff of our 0, :;; of Space Systems. 

This group wil. 1r::.cluct analyses of proposed new systems, the relative 

efficiency of on ,g systems in fulfilling required commitments, and 

will make recom iatic .. ~.:-: with respect to programming. Its work 

will be augmentea ,,_y ad hoc efforts or studies using outside consultants, 

ADDSY p~-

D,ifo . -roP SECRET tHLUPtO ntOW AUTOMATIC Jlt[GllllolCIIIIIG 

000 •IUCllYI! 5200.tO 001::S N-01 Af',.lY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115116 

CONTRQLNO BYE 1~:l365-69 

COPY s: o, ___ COl'IIJ 

l"AG[_1 __ o,_,;.2 __ 1",.~C!i 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115116 

TOP SEGKEI 

We feel strongly the need for this type of dedicated 

analytical capability. Of course our office will continue 

working closely with the President's Science Advisor's 

Panel on NRP Matters. 

BYEMAN 

Comments on how to make this report more useful will be 

appreciated. 

L. McLucas 

Attachment 

BYE 13365· 

BYEMAN 

CONTJlOL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED ¥k0M AUH)~AtlC REGA;jli,01NG 

COPY ___ OF ___ coe 

PAGE 2 OF 2 0:00 Dl!U;C:T!Vf 52:0(UO OOES NOT At>PLV 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05115116
IB 

Union Calendar No. 397 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 219 

[Report No. 115–532] 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to 

provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the 

corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JANUARY 29, 2018 

Additional sponsor: Mr. SABLAN

JANUARY 29, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 219 RH

A BILL 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey 

boundary and to provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 219 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Swan Lake Hydro5 electric Project Boundary Correction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE 

7 SWAN LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

8 BOUNDARY. 

9 Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, after consulta11 tion with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall— 

12 (1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract 

13 of Federal land within the project boundary of the 

14 Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2911) 

15 as generally depicted and labeled ‘‘Lost Creek’’ on 

16 the map entitled ‘‘Swan Lake Project Boundary— 

17 Lot 2’’ and dated February 1, 2016; and 

18 (2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the 

19 tract described in paragraph (1) in accordance 

20 with— 

21 (A) the survey authorized under paragraph 

22 (1); 

23 (B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 

24 (commonly known as the ‘‘Alaska Statehood 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 219 RH

1 Act’’) (48 U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85– 

2 508); and 

3 (C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act 

4 (16 U.S.C. 818). 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 397 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 219 

[Report No. 115–532] 

A BILL 

To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project surrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska. of the remaining tract of land within the cor- vey boundary and to provide for the conveyance 

JANUARY 29, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
... ., ,. 

·.1: .. : ;·,.,£~TOP SEGRE'f ZARF pproved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140947 

.... 

COMPARISON OF THE NUMBERS OF U .s., AND 

USSR RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITES 

,.:-:.-u .: ,:!r.;. --~--, ,·.1. The following is a .comparison of U .,S., and USSR ph_otographic 

._ .... --;~.,.. . ..: and low orbiting ELINT reconnaissance programs, showing the number of · • ·· · ·· 

·-

. launches in 1973, satellites currently active and total in-orbit mission 

: · days of photo~aphic recoz:inaissance satellites in 1973. 

I.a unched in 19 73 Currently Active 

.Y.§.. USSR US USSR 

High Resolution Photographic 

In-orbit Days (1973) 

3 

189 

25 

275 

.l 

Medium Resolution Photographic 4 9 • 0 

In-orI?it Days (1973) ~---~89 " 103 -----, 

~J1 

·1--- . 5* 6 

-~ lr. 

* The USSR medium reso---u~o_n_p~~gr~-3phic slatellites also have an 

Low Orbiting ELINT 

ancillary ELINT payload not includ in the bove total. 

C. ' p 

2 

l 

0 

.6 

J There is· no 

Viet sat !ilte w th a m ss on k own o be comparable wt the above 

programs. The mission of COSMOS 606, which was placed in a semisynchronous orbit in November 1973, however, is unknown. It is possible 

that COSMOS 606 has either a reconnaissance or strategic early warning 

mission. 

3. The USSR is also pursuing an orbital reconnaissance program 

associated with the manned space program. The ffrst satellite in the 

program was SALYUT-II which was launched on 3 April 1973 but which 

• malfunctioned 11 days after entering orbit. The launching of a: similar 

. space station is probably planned for mid to late May 1974. 

-. , BANDLE VJ.A BYEMAN/TALENT-KEYH 

. .. ' 

, -...... Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 qo5140947,-------=====-====-

... 
.vmrn"-f""' IR""''ft Afl,-.,,.,."f"llBPlllt P21l'f"iifl 'l"'llft'f"\'f"'\,..,_ft 

pproved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140947 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE 

FORT GEORGE G, MEADE. MARYL 1ii_]f' rr~,, \ffJtl ~~;i a 

785-74 

BYE 

The Honorable Albert Hall 

· Assistant Secretary of Defenae (Intelligence) 

The Pentagon 

Washington, D.C. 20301 

Dear Dr. Hall. 

the question of number of Soviet Satellite reconnaissance 

vehicles vs .. tJ .s. vehicles raised by Senator McClellan during 

the briefings recently was only generally answered to the effect 

that the Soviet number was larger th.an the U .s. In case the 

subject c:omes up again, I've attached for your information some 

atat1st1ca for the year 1973 .. 

lt•J B. K. Cc.ffh:un 

BENSON K. BUFFHAM 

Acting Director 

cc: Director. NRO (Mr. Plummer) ~ 

... 

OLE CON OL S'fSTEMS JOI LY 

Approved for Release: 2023/04/03 C05140947
# C_2005115EN.01001901.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 March 2005

in Case T-254/02, L v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Duty to provide assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Scope - Harassment - Claim for compensation - Occupational illness)

(2005/C 115/35)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-254/02, L, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in London (United Kingdom), represented by J. Van Rossum, and then by S. Rodrigues and P. Legros, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — APPLICATION for the annulment of the Commission decisions rejecting a request for assistance, access to documents and compensation, and refusing to recognise an occupational illness, and, also, a claim for damages, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; for the Registrar: M. I. Natsinas, administrator, has given a judgment on 9 March 2005 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261 of 26.10.2002.

1

---
/' 

roved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 

HANOI ( V\A 

BYEMAN 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

THE NRO ST.L\FF 

~;~NG~O~~[~N 18 March 1970 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

SUBJECT: TAGBOARD Background Notes 

1. System Capability: 

Drone: Range 3000 NM; speed 3 p 27 mach; Alt, 80,000 -

96 000 sllla]] Resl 

Camera: 24 inch focal length, F5.6 lens, coverage 

3000 NM X 28NM swath stereo, resolution 2 ft nadir. 

2. Drone Status: 

a. 34 drones ordered (D2lB!s, B-52 launch config.) 

13 drone flights through 20 Feb 70 

1 drone inadvertently dropped from B-52 

.2D~-drones remaining 

/7 

b. Of the 20 remaining, 5 are at Beale AFB (Operating 

Location), 15 are at Lockheed, either in temporary storage 

or completing final functional checkout. 

3. Camera Status: 

a. 11 HR-335 B Series ordered from Hycon 

2 lost on drone flights 

-::9-- cameras remaining 

{/I;/:1l2.7, C 

b. Of the 9 remaining, 6 have been delivered, 3 are 

in the final stages of production. Based on projected 

recovery and loss rates, the 9 cameras should be sufficient 

for the 20 drones remaining. 

4. Test Flight Summary: 

a. 6 Nov 67 - 28 Aug 68. Seven test flights. one fully 

successful mission, 2824 miles, hatch air recovered; one 

partially successful mission, 1400 miles 

b. Sep - Dec 68. Program technical review conducted 

by Mr. John Plummer's group from LMSC. Majol' design mods} 

engine inlet and electrical systems. 

BYE-12292-70 (ONTI-lOL NO TOP SE6RET y---- 4 Of COPIES BYEMAN I' AGf --1'--- O' f' 2 PAGF ':> 

{J (f3~7:?--Oc.?,z 

,- ilN! rl{)t S f ~! 

roved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 
----------Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C0511514818 •••••••••••••• 

HAIWLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

l1A NOl IE. lilA 

TOP SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROl. 5 Y 57£ M 

c. 

(;. 

15 Dec 68 - 10 Jul 69. Four test flights. Three 

of the four were successful. 

d. 10 Nov 69. First operational test missiorl. Computational errors in INS computer prevented drone from flyjng 

programmed route. 

e. 20 Feb 70. Completely successful test mission, INS 

program changes validated, fail-safe feature incorporated in 

INS program. 

5. Cost Summary: 

._--------

a. R&D, Production and Test. Approximately $200 million 

through FY-70 (includes original 5 drones developed and tested 

under the OXCART program.) R&D Prod & Test costs are complete. 

b. Contractor support cost, FY-70: $5.9 million. 

c. Contractor support cost Forecast, FY-71: $6.3 million 

6. Operating Uni!: 

4200 Support Squadron, Beale AFB. Two B-52's, three flight 

crews, Blue Suit maintenance. Squadron on Alert status - has 

the capability to launch drone within 6 days from notification. 

i 

\ 

('::'-\- ,., ••• N .~~_.J" 

·._fR'ANK';\( '"HARTLEY~'-- J1' 

Col, USAF 

Director, Program D 

TBP SECRET EXCLuoeD FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD i)lRECnV( 5200 10 00f5 NOl APPlY 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115148 

CONTROL NO BYE-122 92 -7 0 

COPy OF 4 -----'--- COPI ES 

PAG' 2 or 2 --- PAGES
# C_2005104EN.01002001.xml

| 29.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/20

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3686 — Honeywell/Novar)

(2005/C 104/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3686. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3686. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005143EN.01003002.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/30

---

Removal from the register of Case C-165/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 143/52)

(Language of the case: English)

(Language of the case: English)

By order of 2 March 2005, the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-165/04 Commission of the European Communities v Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HANOVER
DIRECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 24, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-24-2000
<CASH>                                           1,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,804)
<INVENTORY>                                     64,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,218
<PP&E>                                          98,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                (50,571)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,843
<BONDS>                                         54,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,951
<OTHER-SE>                                   (112,954)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,402
<SALES>                                        273,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,556
<CGS>                                          110,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,322
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,134)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: "Gary.Kunkel@hsc.utah.edu"

Cc: OTAQ

Subject: RE: Your EPA Inquiry: Tier III early adoption

Date: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 1:12:00 PM

Hi Gary,

Thank you for your inquiry regarding early compliance with EPA’s proposed Tier 3

standards. As described in the proposal, early credits can be earned by vehicle

manufacturers or refiners who reduce their vehicle emissions or gasoline sulfur before

2017. These are credits for voluntary early compliance, and can be used to facilitate

compliance with the Tier 3 program in later years. While vehicle emission control

technologies can be put in place without lowering the sulfur level of gasoline, they would

have higher emissions than we are expecting under the Tier 3 program. The proposed

sulfur limits are necessary to enable newly-designed vehicles to meet the more stringent

Tier 3 emissions standards.

Regards,

Cay

Catherine (Cay) A. Yanca

US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Assessment and Standards Division

2000 Traverwood Drive

Ann Arbor, MI 48105

Phone: 734.214.4769

Gary Kunkel ---01/27/2014 11:46:13 AM---Hello! I noticed in the "Regulatory Announcement" about

Tier III that "credits for early compliance"

From: Gary Kunkel <Gary.Kunkel@hsc.utah.edu>

To: OTAQ@EPA

Date: 01/27/2014 11:46 AM

Subject: Tier III early adoption

Hello! I noticed in the "Regulatory Announcement" about Tier III that "credits for early compliance"

were mentioned. Is it possible for states to adopt Tier III standards before 2017? As Utah would stand

to benefit greatly (perhaps more than any other state) from early adoption, we'd like to push for it if

possible. I'm assuming the vehicular emissions control requirements (at least for the early phase model

years) won't require the proposed lower sulfur gas as well?

Many thanks,Gary Kunkel MD

Utah Physician's for Healthy Environment
#### Sylvester, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and others, Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county dated June 30, 1927: August C. Hoppmann, Judge.

Action to set aside denial of award by *Industrial Commission.*Judgment for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant: *Kroncke &*Sauthoff-and *A. T. Torge,*all of Madison.

For the respondent *Industrial Commission: John W. Reynolds,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents *Sylvester Company*and *Continental Casualty Company: Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CAUSE NO. DA 22-0478

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 and

JOSIAH BRACKETT,

 Defendant and Appellee. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including July 31, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s 

opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 27 2023

06/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0478
# C_2005069EN.01001501.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/15

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 December 2004

in Case T-196/03: European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients (EFfCI) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Manifest inadmissibility - Concept of measure of individual concern to an applicant - European Economic Interest Group - Contracts being performed - Intellectual property rights)

(2005/C 69/29)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-196/03: European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients (EFfCI), established in Brussels (Belgium), represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, Lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents: J. L. Rufas Quintana, M. Moore and K. Bradley, with an address for service in Luxembourg) and Council of the European Union (Agents: E. Karlsson and C. Giorgi Fort), application for the annulment of:

| — | Article 1(2) of Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003, amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (OJ 2003 L 66, p. 26), in so far as it inserts in Directive 76/768 a new Article 4a(2) and (2.1) and a new Article 4b, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 1(2) of Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003, amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (OJ 2003 L 66, p. 26), in so far as it inserts in Directive 76/768 a new Article 4a(2) and (2.1) and a new Article 4b,

| — | Article 1(5) of Directive 2003/15, in so far as it adds a new subparagraph to Article 6(3) of Directive 76/768, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 1(5) of Directive 2003/15, in so far as it adds a new subparagraph to Article 6(3) of Directive 76/768,

the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 December, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the defendants. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the defendants.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00439-CV

IN RE Andrew L. GOSS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 26, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On July 10, 2017, Relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking a mandamus 

directed against the Texas State Attorney General. By statute, this court has authority to issue a 

writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and 

other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221

(West 2004). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, 

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015CI02273, styled Andrew Goss v. Shakia Goss, pending in the 45th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.