alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005019EN.01000801.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-87/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/17/EC - Reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 19/14)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-87/04: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 23 February 2004, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and P. Léouffre) against Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting as President of the Fourth Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive, |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive,

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 85 of 3.4.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF OFFICER


OF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(a)
The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Dated: February 14, 2011





/s/ Jacob Inbar


By: Jacob Inbar,


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





32
#### Esser, Appellant, vs. Breckheimer Brewing Company and another, Respondents.

*January 14*

February *3, 1914.*

*Ejectment: Lease: Evidence.*

In an action of ejectment, findings of the trial court to the effect that the lease under which defendant justified had not been abrogated, that defendant had exercised an option to continue the lease in force beyond the original term, and that plaintiff had purchased the premises with notice of the lease, are *held*to be supported by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray StbveNS, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*621For tbe appellant there was a brief by *John C. Fehlandt*and *Bufus B. Smith,*and oral argument by *Mr. Smith.*

For tbe respondents there ivas a brief by *Aylward, Davies & OTbmch,*and oral argument by *J. A. Ayhuwrd.*

BabNes, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Tbe defendants justified their right of possession under a written lease. The plaintiff contended on the trial (1) that the lease was abrogated by mutual consent'; (2) that the defendant corporation failed to exercise an option contained in the lease to continue it in force beyond the period for which the premises had been originally leased, and that therefore the lease had expired by its terms; and (3) that plaintiff purchased the premises without notice that defendant had a lease of the property which extended for a term of years. The court found against the plaintiff on all three of these questions, and it is insisted that such findings have no sufficient support' in the evidence.

We are satisfied from an examination of the evidence that it cannot be said that any one of the findings attacked is against' the clear preponderance of the evidence. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— It is so ordered.
# C_2004300EN.01004501.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/45

---

Action brought on 15 September 2004 by Coopérative d'Exportation du Livre Français against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-372/04)

(2004/C 300/88)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 September 2004 by the Coopérative d'Exportation du Livre Français, established in Paris, represented by Olivier Schmitt, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities No C (2004) 1361 final of 20 April 2004 concerning aid implemented by France in favour of Coopérative d'Exportation du Livre Français (CELF) in so far as the first sentence of Article 1 thereof categorises the aid benefiting CELF for handling small orders of French-language books, implemented by France between 1980 and 2001, as State aid within Article 87(1) EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities No C (2004) 1361 final of 20 April 2004 concerning aid implemented by France in favour of Coopérative d'Exportation du Livre Français (CELF) in so far as the first sentence of Article 1 thereof categorises the aid benefiting CELF for handling small orders of French-language books, implemented by France between 1980 and 2001, as State aid within Article 87(1) EC;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay EUR 5 000.00 in respect of costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay EUR 5 000.00 in respect of costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant's business is directly handling orders from abroad for books, brochures and all communications media and, more generally, carrying out any transactions for the purpose of furthering the promotion of French culture throughout the world. The applicant states that in carrying out that general-interest activity, it has benefited from various subsidies paid by the French State. The subsidy at issue in these proceedings is an operating subsidy granted to the applicant for the purpose of offsetting the extra costs involved in handling small orders from booksellers abroad.

In support of its action, the applicant argues, first, that the statement of reasons in the contested decision is inadequate. Second, the applicant relies on infringements of Article 86(2) EC and Article 87(1) EC.

The applicant submits that, as an undertaking operating a service of general economic interest, it was made responsible for performing clearly defined public-service obligations. Thus, the sums paid by the State are excluded from the State aid at which Article 87(1) EC is targeted.

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6908-6909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 9, 12, 22, 42, and 52

[FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2013-001; Corrections; Docket 2013-0001; 
Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AM55


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Ending Trafficking in Persons; 
Corrections

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing corrections to FAR Case 2013-
001; Ending Trafficking in Persons (Item

[[Page 6909]]

I), which was published in the Federal Register at 80 FR 4967, January 
29, 2015.

DATES: Effective: March 2, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement 
Analyst, at 202-219-0202, for clarification of content. For information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory 
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2013-
001; Corrections.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Corrections

    In rule FR Doc. 2015-01524 published in the Federal Register at 80 
FR 4967, January 29, 2015, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 4990, in the first column, lines 7, 11, 13, 19, 21, 25, 
30, 32, 54, 60, and 66, correct ``(March 2, 2015)'' to read ``(Mar 
2015)'' (11 times).
    2. On page 4990, in the second column, line 41, correct ``(March 2, 
2015)'' to read ``(Mar 2015).
    3. On page 4992, in the first column, Alternate I, correct ``(March 
2, 2015)'' to read ``(Mar 2015)''.
    4. On page 4992, in the first column, section 52.222-56, line 6, 
correct ``(March 2, 2015)'' to read ``(Mar 2015)''.
    5. On page 4992, in the second column, section 52.244-6, lines 4, 
10, and 12, correct ``(March 2, 2015)'' to read ``(Mar 2015)''.

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 
U.S.C. 20113.

    Dated: February 3, 2015.
William Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02540 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
# Quill: 

A Declassified History
current page

QUILL was an experimental Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite, based on the Corona satellite and available SAR hardware, which flew one time in 1964. Because of diplomatic and security concerns the brief mission imaged only selected targets with the United States. Those targets could be inspected on the ground to validate the intelligence value of orbital SAR without alerting the Soviets to the capability or touching off diplomatic protest over active illumination of sovereign territory. This was a proof-of-concept mission.

#### Aides

          - QUILL Frequently Asked Questions
          - QUILL Declassification Guidelines
          - QUILL Fact Sheet

#### Declassified Histories

Two histories about QUILL have been declassified and released: Robert Perry’s 1972 “Radar in Orbit” history of the QUILL program and Robert L. Butterworth’s 2004 revision his own history, The First Imaging Radar Satellite.
          - Radar in Orbit
          - The First Imaging Radar Satellite

#### Declassified QUILL Lecture

On August 14, 2011 a lecture about QUILL was given at NRO headquarters in Chantilly, Virginia by Dr. Jeffery Charleston. This lecture has been declassified and provided to the public here along with the pamphlet which was made available at the lecture. The declassified pictures used during the lecture can be found in the lecture transcript.
          - QUILL Lecture Transcript
          - QUILL Lecture Pamphlet

#### Declassified Documents
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests

# Recent FOIA Requests for 2011

The following pages present chronological listings of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Requests submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during each month of the current fiscal year. These listings include the subject and reference number of each request. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 12, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 12, 2023
# CA2004317EN.01005001.xml

| 22.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 317/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 317/50

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director in DG Research (Article 29(1a) and (2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/2004/10560

(Official Journal of the European Union C 298 A of 3 December 2004)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 298 A of 3 December 2004

(2004/C 317 A/04)

Page 3, on the second line:

for:

for

‘As part of this work the Directorate-General for Research wishes to recruit a Director to manage Directorate I “Environment” (approximately 100 staff; annual budget of EUR 2 120 000)’.

read:

read:

‘As part of this work the Directorate-General for Research wishes to recruit a Director to manage Directorate I “Environment” (approximately 100 staff; annual budget of approximately EUR 200 million).’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          24,631                  23,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,345                   2,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (89)                   (115)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,815                  27,111
<PP&E>                                           2,168                   1,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (801)                   (339)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,381                  28,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,399                   3,319
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        22,571                  21,269
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,241                   3,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,381                  28,410
<SALES>                                         23,367                  14,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,367                  14,071
<CGS>                                            2,590                     980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,590                     980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,136                   9,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (33)                     (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,782                   4,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,102                   1,622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,680                   2,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,680                   2,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68                     .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61                     .47


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited  consolidated  fiancial  statements  at May 31,  1998 and for the nine
month perid ended May 31, 1998 is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.  Earnings  per share  information  has been  restated  to
conform with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003934
<NAME>                        Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             162,098
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,099,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (553,499)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,954,335
<PP&E>                                          24,125,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,317,899)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,065,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,490,403
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            39,206
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,814,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,065,261
<SALES>                                         32,845,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,845,094
<CGS>                                           17,597,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,597,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,943,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95,384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,210,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,846,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                       704,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,142,021
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (143,000)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       999,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.30<F1>  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.27<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Represents  basic  earnings  per share in  accordance  with SAFAS No.  128,
     Earnings Per Share.
<F2> Represents  diluted  earnings  per share in  accordance  with SFAS No. 128,
     Earnings Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Kenneth Carter et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Respondent, and New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 567]

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, the New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated December 17, 2002, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of Dubowy v City of New York,*305 AD2d 320 [2003]; *Matter of Affleck v County of Nassau,*240 AD2d 569 [1997]; *Rosenblatt v City of New York,*160 AD2d 927 [1990]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS OF LAMINATING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         738,933
<SECURITIES>                                 2,459,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                    398,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,818,756
<PP&E>                                         180,634<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,999,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          355,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,572,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,999,390
<SALES>                                        519,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               519,069
<CGS>                                          401,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,702,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,352,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,352,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.49)
<FN>
<F1>NET AMOUNT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>