alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2208

CRUZ ANDRES VENTURA-ORELLANA,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-629-255)

Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: April 24, 2000

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul S. Allen, Pauline M. Schwartz, PAUL, SHEARMAN, ALLEN & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting

Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director,

Anthony C. Payne, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 Section 307(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform Immigrant

Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat.

3009 repealed 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h). However, because this case was

in transition at the time the IIRIRA was passed, § 1253(h) is still

applicable under the terms of the IIRIRA’s transitional rules.

2 Section 306(b) of the IIRIRA repealed 8 U.S.C.

§ 1105a(a)(4), replacing it with 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(4) (West

1999). Again, because Ventura-Orellana’s case was in transition at

the time of the effective date of the IIRIRA, the transitional

rules provide for judicial review under § 1105a(a)(4) as it existed

before enactment of the IIRIRA. See IIRIRA § 309(c)(4).

2

PER CURIAM:

Cruz Andres Ventura-Orellana, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, seeks review a final order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying his claims for political asylum, 8 U.S.C.A.

§ 1158 (West 1999), and withholding of deportation, 8 U.S.C.

§ 1253(h) (1994).1 We find that the Board’s decision is supported

by substantial evidence. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478,

481 (1992); 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994).2 Accordingly, we deny

Ventura-Orellana’s petition for review and affirm the Board’s

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2005031EN.01002201.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/22

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 November 2004

in Case T-316/04: R Wam SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(State aid - Loans at reduced rates intended to enable an undertaking to become established in certain non-member countries - Obligation to recover - Application for interim measures - Suspension of operation - Urgency - None)

(2005/C 31/44)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-316/04 R: Wam SpA, established in Cavezzo di Modena (Italy), represented by E. Giliani, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2004) 1812 final of 19 May 2004 on State aid C-4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) – the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 10 November 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---