alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 8, 2016

Order 

Clerk

July 8, 2016

153980(73)

In re Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR.

BEATRICE KING, Individually and as Personal

Representative of the Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR.,

Appellant,

SC: 153980

v COA: 323387

Saginaw Probate Ct: 13-130558-DE

JACQUELINE E. NASH, BILLY J. ERWIN,

DEMARKIUS ERWIN, MAGGIE ERWIN, and

STACY ERWIN OAKES,

Appellees.

In re Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR.

BEATRICE KING,

Appellant,

SC: 153981

v COA: 329264

Saginaw Probate Ct: 13-130558-DE

JACQUELINE E. NASH, BILLY J. ERWIN,

DEMARKIUS ERWIN, MAGGIE ERWIN,

STACY ERWIN OAKES, and DOUGLAS

TAYLOR,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of appellee Maggie Erwin to extend the 

time for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 

answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 9, 2016.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jost Fischer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|December 7, 2007 |  | /s/JOST FISCHERName:  Jost Fischer
Title:Chairman, President and Chief
            Executive Officer
            (Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Sirona Dental
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 87 (Monday, May 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0650; FRL-9809-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana; Consent Decree Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 
the March 15, 2013, direct final rule approving a revision to the 
Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA will address the comment 
in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed rulemaking action, 
also published on March 15, 2013. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 78 FR 16412 on March 15, 
2013, is withdrawn as of May 6, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam Portanova, Environmental Engineer, 
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3189, portanova.sam@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is withdrawing the March 15, 2013 (78 FR 
16412), direct final rule approving a revision to Indiana's 
construction permit rule for sources subject to the state operating 
permit program regulations at 40 CFR Part 70. In the direct final rule, 
EPA stated that if adverse comments were received by April 15, 2013, 
the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On March 18, 2013, EPA 
received a comment, which it interprets as adverse and, therefore, EPA 
is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in a 
subsequent final action based upon the proposed rulemaking action, also 
published on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16449). EPA will not institute a 
second comment period on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: April 22, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.770 published in the Federal 
Register on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16412) on page 16414 is withdrawn as 
of May 6, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-10690 Filed 5-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
----

Action brought on 8 December 2004 by Armour Pharmaceutical Company against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-483/04)

(2005/C 69/39)

Language in which the application was submitted: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 December 2004 by Armour Pharmaceutical Company, established in Bridgewater (United States), represented by Richard Gilbey, lawyer.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited was also a party to the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

----
II 

Calendar No. 159 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 220 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric 

project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

4 UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION AUTHOR5 IZATION. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

8 means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

9 (2) TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC

10 PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Terror Lake Hydroelectric 

11 Project’’ means the project identified in section 1325 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 220 PCS 

1 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

2 Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is Federal Energy 

3 Regulatory Commission project number 2743. 

4 (3) UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION EXPAN5 SION.—The term ‘‘Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 

6 Expansion’’ means the expansion of the Terror Lake 

7 Hydroelectric Project as generally described in Ex8 hibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Applica9 tion dated July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alas10 ka Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund 

11 Round VIII by Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 

12 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The licensee for the Terror 

13 Lake Hydroelectric Project may occupy not more than 20 

14 acres of Federal land to construct, operate, and maintain 

15 the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion without fur16 ther authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or 

17 under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

18 Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). 

19 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—The Upper Hidden Basin Di20 version Expansion shall be subject to appropriate terms 

21 and conditions included in an amendment to a license 

22 issued by the Commission pursuant to the Federal Power 

23 Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), including section 4(e) of that 

24 Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)), following an environmental review 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 220 PCS 

1 by the Commission under the National Environmental 

2 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 159 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 220 

AN ACT 

To authorize the expansion of an existing 

hydroelectric project, and for other purposes. 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2004217EN.01000902.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 July 2004

in Case C-389/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 1999/74/EC)

(2004/C 217/17)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-389/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) — application for a declaration that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens (OJ 1999 L 203, p. 53), and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, F. Macken (Rapporteur) and K. Lenaerts, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251 of 18.10.2003.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT




Board of Directors
Sterile Recoveries, Inc.


We have issued our reports dated February 26, 1999 accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sterile Recoveries, Inc. that 
are included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the 
Registration Statement of Sterile Recoveries, Inc. on Form S-B (File No. 
333-31911, effective July 23, 1997).





                                   GRANT THORNTON LLP





Tampa, Florida
February 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998             JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                 405,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               2,008,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 290,272
<INVENTORY>                                          0               2,566,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0               5,432,148
<PP&E>                                               0               3,403,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 820,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0               8,041,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               4,020,935
<BONDS>                                              0               1,818,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                      80
<COMMON>                                             0                   4,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               2,197,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0               8,041,007
<SALES>                                      2,030,167               4,543,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,030,167               4,543,918
<CGS>                                        1,545,613               3,366,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,319,783               3,021,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,377                  70,671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,556                 108,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (948,833)             (1,978,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (948,833)             (1,978,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (948,833)             (1,978,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)                  (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005057EN.01000902.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 20 January 2005

in Case C-300/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hessisches Finanzgericht, Kassel): Honeywell Aerospace GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen (1)

1

(Community transit - Incurrence of a customs debt in the event of offences or irregularities - Consequence of the lack of indication to the principal of the time-limit for furnishing proof of the place where the offence or irregularity occurred)

(2005/C 57/17)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-300/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Hessisches Finanzgericht, Kassel (Germany), made by decision of 25 April 2003, received at the Court on 11 July 2003, in the proceedings between Honeywell Aerospace GmbH and Hauptzollamt Gießen – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur) and K. Schiemann, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 20 January 2005, in which it has ruled:

Honeywell Aerospace GmbH

Hauptzollamt Gießen

Article 203(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code in conjunction with Article 379 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation No 2913/92 must be interpreted as meaning that a customs debt has been incurred where a consignment placed under the external Community transit procedure has not been presented at the customs office of destination, but that the Member State to which the office of departure belongs may take steps to recover the debt only if it has indicated to the principal that he has three months in which to furnish the proof requested and such proof has not been provided within that period.

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.09.2003.

1

---
#### Nazaire J. Gendron *vs.*Amedie Legere, Applt.

York County.

Decided December 17, 1921.

*Willard & Ford,*for plaintiff.

*E. P. Spinney and Lucius B. Sweet,*for defendant.

This is an action of assumpsit for installing a furnace in the house of the defendant.

The jury found for the defendant. A careful reading of the testimony shows that the jury was well warranted in finding the conclusion at which they arrived.

As the case presents a pure question of fact, an analysis or discussion of the testimony would be without profit to the parties or as a precedent. Motion overruled.
#### Grimm, Respondent, vs. Chatt, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Perry & Perry*of Black River Falls.

For the respondent: *Donovan & Gleiss*of Tomah.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004217EN.01000801.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 July 2004

Case C-292/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Member State's failure to fulfil obligations - Environment - End-of-life vehicles - Directive 2000/53/EC)

(2004/C 217/14)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-292/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Konstantinidis and P. Aalto) v Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski) — application for a declaration that, by having failed to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles (OJ No L 269, p. 34) or, in any event, by having failed to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, F. Macken (Rapporteur) and K. Lenaerts, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 July 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by having failed to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by having failed to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

1

---
# C_2004177EN.01000502.xml

| 9.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3460 — CHARTERHOUSE / AUTOBAR)

(2004/C 177/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3460. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3460. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Sharlene R. Matten, PhD

USEPA, OCSPP/OSCP

February 24, 2015

Note to Docket ID., EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0766-0002, OCSPP 890.2100: Avian Two-generation Toxicity 

Test in the Japanese Quail (JQTT), Public Draft dated 12/172014. Errata – References to Appendix 1 

and 7.

1. Reference to Appendix 1, p. 13-14 is incorrect [see underlined text]. The correct reference is 

Appendix 6, Histopathology Guidance.

a. First reference, p. 12, Middle of the page.

“...Organs including kidneys, liver, spleen, adrenal glands, reproductive organs and associated structures, 

cloacal gland, bursa, and right thyroid gland should be excised and preserved in Davidson's fixative or a 

suitable alternative for histopathological examination. A detailed description of excision, fixation, and 

tissue preparation is provided in Appendix I (pages 3-41) of this document.” Correct reference is 

Appendix 6 (no page numbers).

b. Second reference, p. 13, Top of the page.

“...14 day old chicks will be fixed in situ. A detailed description of excision, fixation, and tissue 

preparation is provided in Appendix I (pages 93- 114) of this document.” Correct reference is Appendix 

6 (no page numbers).

2. p. 14, Incorrect Reference to Appendix 7. The correct reference should be Appendix 5, 

Recommendations for Preparation of Samples, where there is a detailed description of sample 

preparation for blood, thyroid gland, and yolk.

a. Incorrect reference to Appendix 7 (p. 14) appears in the following two sentences:

A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for thyroid hormone

and immunoassay analyses are found in Appendix 7."

"A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for steroid hormone

and immunoassay analyses are found in Appendix 7."

b. Correct reference to Appendix 5. The sentence (it appears twice) should be rewritten as 

follows, "A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for thyroid (or 

steroid) hormone analysis and immunoassay is found in Appendix 5."