alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004300EN.01001602.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 19 October 2004

in Case C-472/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles): Siomab SA v Institut bruxellois pour la gestion de l'environnement (1)

1

(Environment - Waste - Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on shipments of waste - Competence of the authority of dispatch to verify the classification of the purpose of a shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment based on an incorrect classification - Objection procedure)

(2004/C 300/32)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-472/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles (Belgium), made by decision of 20 December 2002, received at the Court on 27 December 2002, in the proceedings between Siomab SA and Institut bruxellois pour la gestion de l'environnement — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 19 October 2004, in which it has ruled:

Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Commission Decision 98/368/EC of 18 May 1998 and Commission Decision 1999/816/EC of 24 November 1999, is to be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has recourse, under Article 6(8) of that regulation, to the specific procedure whereby the competent authority of dispatch transmits the consignment note for a shipment of waste for recovery, that authority, if it considers it necessary to object to the shipment on the ground that it has been incorrectly classified by the notifier, may not reclassify the shipment on its own initiative and is required to transmit that document to the other competent authorities and the consignee. It is then for that authority to inform the notifier and the other competent authorities concerned of its objection by any appropriate means before the end of the period laid down in Article 7(2) of the Regulation at the latest.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

1

---
# C_2005082EN.01002802.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/28

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 26 January 2005

in Case T-267/03 Anna Maria Roccato v the Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Internal competition - Non-admission to oral test - Selection Board's discretion - Scope of judicial review)

(2005/C 82/55)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-267/03: Anna Maria Roccato a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Bruxelles (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for annulment of the decision of the Selection Board in competition COM/PB/99 of 24 January 2003 and claim for damages – the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and V. Vadapalas, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 26 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 4.10.2003.

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Nutrient Management, Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Treatment Lagoon, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

JOSEPH NEWMAN, JR.,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 178 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### Meyer, Respondent, vs. Steineke, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Sanders & McCormick*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Bouck, Hilton, Kluwin & Dempsey*of Oshkosh.

*By the Cotirt,*— Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2154

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename the Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in Fargo, 
  North Dakota, as the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              CENTER IN FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA AS THE EDWARD T. SCHAFER 
              AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Renaming.--The Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in 
Fargo, North Dakota, shall hereafter be known and designated as the 
``Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2154

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To rename the Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in Fargo, 
  North Dakota, as the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7646-7647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02742]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail International 
Regional Rates Boxes Contracts

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add Priority Mail International 
Regional Rates Boxes Contracts to the Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: February 11, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Baylis, 202-268-6464.

[[Page 7647]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on February 4, 
2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the 
United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail International 
Regional Rate Boxes Contracts to the Competitive Products List, and 
Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Contract and Application for Non-
Public Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal. Documents are available 
at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-31 and CP2015-40.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2015-02742 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2004321EN.01001102.xml

| 28.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3574 — RABOBANK/BGZ)

(2004/C 321/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3574. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3574. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Name
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ SCOTT J. ROBINSON
Scott J. Robinson
    
    Vice President, Corporate Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
    
    February 3, 2010(Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ MICHAEL S. FIELDS
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Michael S. Fields/s/ CHARLES A. HAGGERTY
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Charles A. Haggerty/s/ LINDA W. HART
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Linda W. Hart/s/ RONALD T. LEMAY
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Ronald T. LeMay/s/ RAYMOND LEUNG
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Raymond Leung/s/ L. WHITE MATTHEWS, III
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010L. White Matthews, III/s/ GLEN A. TAYLOR
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Glen A. Taylor/s/ DARYL J. WHITE
    
    Director
    
    February 3, 2010Daryl J. White
#### Johnson, Appellant, vs. Johnson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Lilian M. Kohlmets*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Lewis I. Cohen*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 219 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 306
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 219

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2018

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to 
 provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the 
           corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project 
Boundary Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE SWAN LAKE HYDROELECTRIC 
              PROJECT BOUNDARY.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of 
Agriculture, shall--
            (1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract of Federal 
        land within the project boundary of the Swan Lake Hydroelectric 
        Project (FERC No. 2911) as generally depicted and labeled 
        ``Lost Creek'' on the map entitled ``Swan Lake Project 
        Boundary--Lot 2'' and dated February 1, 2016; and
            (2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the tract 
        described in paragraph (1) in accordance with--
                    (A) the survey authorized under paragraph (1);
                    (B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 
                (commonly known as the ``Alaska Statehood Act'') (48 
                U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85-508); and
                    (C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
                818).

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 306

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 219

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to 
 provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the 
           corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 7, 2018

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2191 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2191

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to revise certain regulations 
         relating to aircraft boarding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2017

  Mr. Dunn (for himself, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Buchanan, and Mr. 
    Neal) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to revise certain regulations 
         relating to aircraft boarding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Equity in Airline 
Transportation Act of 2017'' or the ``SEAT Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. AIRCRAFT BOARDING.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation shall issue a final rule to revise part 250 
of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to prohibit an air carrier 
from denying air transportation to a passenger on an oversold aircraft 
that the passenger has physically boarded based on the status of the 
passenger with respect to the priority rules and criteria of the 
carrier for determining which passengers holding confirmed reserved 
space shall be denied boarding in the event that an insufficient number 
of volunteers come forward.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004148EN.01000801.xml

| 3.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/8

---

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Cards Regional Programme 2003

Democratic Stabilisation — Network to Network Programme

EuropeAid/119907/C/G/Multi

(2004/C 148/08)

The European Commission is seeking proposals for the following spheres of co-operation:

| — | Strengthening local civil society network organisations and the civil society sector |
| --- | --- |

—

Strengthening local civil society network organisations and the civil society sector

| — | Support to the local democratic process |
| --- | --- |

—

Support to the local democratic process

in Albania, Bosnia, and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, F.Y.R. Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro (including Kosovo) with financial assistance from the CARDS Regional Programme 2003 Democratic Stabilisation of the European Communities.

The full Guidelines for Applicants are available for consultation on the following internet site:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl

The deadline for submission of proposals is Wednesday 15 September 2004 at 16h00 CET.

---
I 

I J 

' r 

SERVED: October 9, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DESHAUN BLACKETT 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0850 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin · 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Deshaun L. Blackett, Respondent 

10671 Hamilton Plaza 

Apt. 402 

Omaha, NE 68114-2078 

TEL: (NONE PROVIDED) 

FAX: (NONE PROVIDED) 

ONE COPY 

Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0850 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

IKE RAYEFORD WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton 

Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 

1:02-cv-00359) 

Submitted: January 25, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010 

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

George B. Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina; M. Gordon Widenhouse, 

Jr., RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, 

Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ike Rayeford Williams appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying his “Motion to Re-enter Previous Order of 24 June 2005.” 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 

1:02-cv-00359 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# C_2005019EN.01001002.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/10

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 29 October 2004

in Case C-18/04 P: Grégoire Krikorian and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Action for damages - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part unfounded)

(2005/C 19/20)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-18/04 P: Grégoire Krikorian, residing in Bouc-Bel-Air (France), Suzanne Krikorian, née Tatoyan, residing in Bouc-Bel-Air (France), Euro-Arménie ASBL, established in Marseille (France), (avocat: P. Krikorian), the other parties to the proceedings being European Parliament (Agents: A. Baas and R. Passos), Council of the European Union, (Agents: S. Kyriakopoulou and G. Marhic), Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Ladenburger and F. Dintilhac) – Appeal pursuant to Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 16 January 2004 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur) and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 29 October 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The appellants shall bear the costs of the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The appellants shall bear the costs of the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

1

---