alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 6 May 2004 by Petrotub S.A., against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-174/04)

(2004/C 179/32)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 6 May 2004 by Petrotub S.A., Roman, Romania, represented by Mr A.L. Merckx, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The contested regulation was adopted by the Council in an effort to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 9 January 2003 in case C-76/00 P. This judgment set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 December 1999 in Joined Cases T-33/98 and T-34/98 Petrotub and Republica v. Council (2) and annulled Council Regulation (EC) No. 2320/1997 of 17 November 1997 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel in so far as it concerned Petrotub S.A. and Republica S.A.

In support of its application the applicant submits that the Council has exceeded its discretionary power under Article 233 EC by implementing the judgment in a way that infringes Articles 6 paragraphs 1 and 9 and 2 paragraph 11 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (3). More particularly, the applicant contends that Article 6 paragraph 9 was infringed since the contested regulation was adopted on the basis of the initial investigation even though more than 15 months had elapsed since its initiation. Further, Article 6 paragraph 1 was infringed in that the anti-dumping measures adopted were no longer based on information relating to a period of at least six months immediately prior to the initiation of proceedings. The applicant also contends that the contested regulation does not contain adequate motivation as to why the first two methods of calculation of the dumping margin, provided for in Article 2 paragraph 11 of Regulation No 384/96, were rejected in favour of the third method. On this basis the applicant claims that the contested regulation also infringed Article 2 paragraph 11 of Regulation No 384/1996 as well as Article 253 EC.

----

(1)OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 12.

(2)  [1999] ECR-II 3837.

(3)OJ L 56 , 6.3.1996, p. 1.

----
# C_2005033EN.01001501.xml

| 8.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/15

---

Amendment to the notice of invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries

(
  Official Journal of the European Union, C 253 of 13 October 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union, C 253 of 13 October 2004

(2005/C 33/09)

Page 8, the text of point 2, under heading I ‘Subject’, reads as follows:

‘The total quantity in respect of which there may be fixed a maximum export refund as provided in Article 4(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 (1), is approximately 3 000 000 tonnes.’.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

1

---
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__2012

________ - NM -

___ 0 16

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant ? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

1. Permanent canal or lateral used to convey 

irrigation water from source to one or more 

irrigation areas

Irrigation Canal or Lateral (320) Initial Settings: All land between water 

source and point(s) of use and downstream 

areas affected by seepage losses

Start

I.7 (+) Agribusiness

D.1 (+) Infrastructure & 

operational costs

I.1 (+) Cost to 

farmer I.2 (+) Plant health 

& productivity

I.9 (+) Economic 

benefit to farmer

D.2 (+) Efficient use of water on 

irrigated land

I.8 (+) Gross 

returns to farmer

I.4 (+) Water 

quality

I.11 (-) 

Sediment 

deposition in 

watercourses

I.10 (-) 

Nutrients in 

surface and 

ground water

D.3 (-) Water conveyance 

losses

I.5 (-) Soil 

erosion

I.3 (+) Water 

quantity

I.6 (-) Artificial wetlands, 

seeps is possible

I.12 (-) Biodiversity 

and wildlife habitat

C.1 (+) Income stability 

(individuals & community)

C.2 (+) Environmental 

quality Pathway

#, Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Associated practice

Mitigation

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
# C_2004233EN.01000101.xml

| 18.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 September 2004

(2004/C 233/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2211 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4389 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6801 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1091 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,548 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,21 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,435 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,452 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6605 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4276 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3493 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 117 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,95 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,92 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 847 300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7441 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5855 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5241 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8448 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0661 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,996 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2211

JPY

Japanese yen

134,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4389

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6801

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1091

CHF

Swiss franc

1,548

ISK

Iceland króna

87,21

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,435

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,452

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6605

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4276

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3493

ROL

Romanian leu

41 117

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,95

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,92

TRL

Turkish lira

1 847 300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7441

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5855

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5241

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8448

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0661

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,11

ZAR

South African rand

7,996

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeMichael J. DeePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.William C. Wiedel, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


February 10, 2011
# C_2005059EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 March 2005

(2005/C 59/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3246 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4448 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0499 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5509 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,39 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2010 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5823 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,523 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 241,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4313 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8890 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 35 867 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,69 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,604 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6792 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6655 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6242 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3317 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7964 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1502 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 330,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7414 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3246

JPY

Japanese yen

138,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4448

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0499

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5509

ISK

Iceland króna

79,39

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2010

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5823

CZK

Czech koruna

29,523

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

241,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4313

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8890

ROL

Romanian leu

35 867

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,69

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,604

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6792

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6655

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6242

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3317

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7964

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1502

KRW

South Korean won

1 330,30

ZAR

South African rand

7,7414

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 South Dakota - Fiscal Year 2024
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 1, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Stuart Cartner (the
"LENDER").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and Lender executed a Loan and
Pledge Agreement dated as of January 18, 2001 (the "LOAN DATE") in the amount of
100,000 dollars ($ 100,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to amend and modify the Loan
Agreement as of the Loan Date to clarify certain provisions.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. The ", or" shall be deleted
from the end of Section 3.5(i), and the following shall be added:

                  "or under substantially similar terms as those set forth in
                  this Agreement, or"

         2.       EFFECTIVE TIME OF AMENDMENT. The amendment and modification to
the Loan Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactively
effective as of the Loan Date.

         3.       NON-MODIFICATION. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the Loan Date.

                                    WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer


                                    LENDER


                                    By: /s/ Stuart W. Cartner
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                    Name:           Stuart W. Cartner
                                         -------------------------------------
                                    Title:
                                          ------------------------------------
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Physical Protection of Shipments of Irradiated Reactor Fuel: Final Report (NUREG-0561, Revision 2)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG - 0561, Final Report, Revision 2 (PDF 919.53 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2013**Date Published:**April 2013 

**Prepared by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

and

Division of Security PolicyOffice of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This guidance document sets forth means, methods and procedures that the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) considers acceptable for satisfying the requirements for the physical protection of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) during transportation by road, rail and water, and for satisfying the requirements for background investigations of individuals granted unescorted access to SNF during transportation. Chapter 1 discusses the regulatory basis and definitions applicable to shipments of SNF. Chapter 2 corresponds to the general requirements for the physical protection of SNF while in transit. These requirements apply to all SNF shipments regardless of the mode of transportation used for a particular shipment. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 discuss additional requirements specific to each particular transport mode—road, rail, or U.S. waters. Chapter 6 discusses the requirements for background investigations of individuals with unescorted access to SNF in transit.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Heinz-Joachim Neubürger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SiemensAktiengesellschaft; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Reserved;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 29, 2004   /s/ HEINZ-JOACHIM NEUBÜRGERHeinz-Joachim Neubürger
# C_2005021EN.01000101.xml

| 26.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 January 2005

(2005/C 21/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3025 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6956 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0701 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,546 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 81,35 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5825 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,105 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4316 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,072 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 37 757 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,75 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,613 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7357 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6988 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5994 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1585 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8314 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1337 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,4 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7314 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3025

JPY

Japanese yen

134,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6956

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0701

CHF

Swiss franc

1,546

ISK

Iceland króna

81,35

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5825

CZK

Czech koruna

30,105

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4316

PLN

Polish zloty

4,072

ROL

Romanian leu

37 757

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,75

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,613

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7357

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6988

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5994

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1585

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8314

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1337

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,4

ZAR

South African rand

7,7314

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004300EN.01002301.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/23

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 21 October 2004

in Case C-477/03: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directives 2001/12/EC, 2001/13/EC and 2001/14/EC - Community railways - Development - Licensing of railway undertakings - Allocation of capacity, infrastructure charges and safety certification - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2004/C 300/47)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-477/03: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations brought on 17 November 2003 by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Schmidt and W. Wils) against Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur), Judges; Advocate General: P. Léger; Registrar: R. Grass, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways, Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings, and Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under those Directives; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways, Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings, and Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under those Directives;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

1

---