alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1273

KAREN DISHMAN POWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:10-cv-00069-jpj-pms)

Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karen Dishman Powell, Appellant Pro Se. John W. Campbell, 

CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Tampa, Florida; Robert P. Floyd, 

III, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Karen Dishman Powell appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint for 

failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Powell v. Sykes Enters., Inc., 

No. 1:10-cv-00069-jpj-pms (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2011). We deny 

Powell’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

p0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

144929

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144929

COA: 306136

Genesee CC: 08-022275-FH

FREDERICK O’NEAL WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### J. W. Damp and Sons Hardware Company, Respondent, vs. La Varnway, Appellant.

For the appellant: *John P. Reiser*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Nohl, Nohl, Petrie & Blame*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.U.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                           EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION
                      OMNIBUS PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES

         Pursuant to Section 13.1 of the El Paso Energy Corporation Omnibus Plan
for Management Employees, Amended and Restated effective as of December 3, 1999
(the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective February 7, 2001:

         WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation of El Paso Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was amended to change the name of the
corporation to El Paso Corporation effective February 7, 2001.

         NOW THEREFORE, the name of the Plan is hereby changed to the "El Paso
Corporation Omnibus Plan for Management Employees" and all references in the
Plan to "El Paso Energy Corporation" or the "Company" shall mean "El Paso
Corporation."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 7th day of February 2001.


                                       EL PASO CORPORATION

                                       By:      /s/ Joel Richards III
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Human Resources and Administration


Attest:

    /s/ David L. Siddall
----------------------------
    Corporate Secretary
Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C051 07969 

~IONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

26 January 1968 

IvlEMORAl'ID1JM FOR COLONEL WORTHMAN 

SUBJECT: Paper Mapping from Satellite Photography by Dr. Doyle 

I believe this paper should not be released for publication 

because it indicates the present National Reconnaissance Program 

programs much too accurately. There are only a few items which are 

clearly derived from classified information) such as the fact that 

spacecraft resolution is better than the resolution we can obtain 

from aircraft (page 3). There are other facts which only a person 

who is thoroughly acquainted with the NRP would be aware of to the 

degree this paper shows. FO'r example: 

(1) The discussion of resonant altitudes on page 5 . 

(2) The fact that the minimum practical, altitude is 80 NM;-

as mentioned on page 5. 

(3) The fact that stellar photography is necessary and 

feasible. 

(4) The fact that the Mark 5 recovery vehicle can be used 

to return film from orbit is clearly indicated. 

(5) The present practice of deboosting spacecraft from orbit 

is indicated on page 15· 

(6) The climatology problems are accurately described on page 18. 

(7) The use of thin base film is also mentioned on page 18. 

'E'lere are several other incidental comments such as the fact that t~e 

proposed EROS system would have a resolution of 5.4 x 10-5 to 1. 08 x 10-

radians. This exceeds the definition of a reconnaissance sensor. The 

justification, while concentrating upon North America, also indicates that 

HANDLE VIA 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADiNG 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C051 07969 

CONTROL NO 1;~(t;J COpy ,;!.,.tJ OF 2 COPIES 

PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 

I • 
HANDLE VIA 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C051 07969 

HANDLE VIA 

' .. TOP SECRET BY[Mf.U~ CONTROL SYSTEM 

the economic analysis should consider coverage of South America (page 19), 

and it is pointed out on page 21 that 1: 24,000 'control can be obtained 

allYl"here in the world by the use of the proposed system. 

V~~_~~ 

~.;l;-:7 'l.~0 / 

ALBEHT W o/JOHNSON 

Maj o:l;'"dSAF 7 '.)~'. 

BYEMAN CONTROL No~t-/'t.f/6~ COpy ..:L.. OF 2 COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-911V

Filed: March 11, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JANETTE COLE, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis

* (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * to Vaccine Administration; SIRVA;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul R. Brazil, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for petitioner.

Alexis Babcock, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On September 26, 2014, Janette Cole filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she “suffered shoulder injuries 

which were caused in fact” by the Tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis [“Tdap”] 

vaccination she received on December 27, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned 

to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 11, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes 

“compensation is appropriate” in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 3. 

Specifically, respondent “concludes that Ms. Cole suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration, a non-Table injury, and that the preponderance of the medical 

evidence indicates that the injury was causally related to the vaccination.” Id.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1998
<CASH>                                       6,189,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,190,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,497,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 34,711,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,409,000
<PP&E>                                       7,462,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,254,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,060,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,435,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,895,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,060,000
<SALES>                                     30,972,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,972,000
<CGS>                                       24,101,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,527,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,571,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   616,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   915,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        


</TABLE>
# C_2005115EN.01004102.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/41

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-159/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/75)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 19 January 2005, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-159/04, Davide Rovetta v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.

1

---
# C_2004231EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 September 2004

(2004/C 231/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2238 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4383 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6848 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1175 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5417 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,74 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,398 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,577 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,397 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6613 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4282 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3625 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 183 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,95 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,955 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 829 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7502 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5889 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5456 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,851 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0669 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0188 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2238

JPY

Japanese yen

134,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4383

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6848

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1175

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5417

ISK

Iceland króna

87,74

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,398

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,577

CZK

Czech koruna

31,397

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6613

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4282

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3625

ROL

Romanian leu

41 183

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,95

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,955

TRL

Turkish lira

1 829 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7502

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5889

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5456

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,851

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0669

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,27

ZAR

South African rand

8,0188

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Arizona - Fiscal Year 2024
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Composting Facility (Code 317) 

A structure or device to contain and facilitate an aerobic

microbial ecosystem for the decomposition of manure,

other organic material, or both, into a final product

sufficiently stable for storage, onfarm use, and application

to land as a soil amendment. 

Practice Information 

A composting facility is designed to produce an amendment

that adds organic matter and beneficial organisms to the

soil, provides slow-release plant-available nutrients, and improves soil health. This amendment can be

applied to the land or marketed to the public. 

Organic solid wastes to be composted derive primarily from agricultural production or processing. The

compost can be reused in the operation, utilized for crop production, improve soil health, or marketed

to the public. 

Composting is accomplished by mixing a carbon material with a nitrogen-rich material in a manner

that encourages the growth of aerobic bacteria. Bins, windrows, or in-vessel structures, such as a

rotary drum, can be used. 

Design information for this practice includes site location, design sizing, storage period, and

safety/biosecurity features. It may also include fabricated structure criteria. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 15 years. Operation requirements for the facility depend

on the type of facility chosen by the producer. For every system, the temperature and moisture

content of the compost will be monitored frequently. Bin or windrow compost must be turned at least

once during the composting process. The operation and maintenance plan includes provisions for

proper utilization of residual material. Routine maintenance is needed to ensure the facility operates

as designed. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Composting Facility (Code 317) is commonly applied

with NRCS CPSs Roofs and Covers (Code 367), Roof Runoff Structure (Code 558), Heavy Use Area

Protection (Code 561), Waste Storage Facility (Code 313), and Waste Transfer (Code 634). Utilization

of composted material will be handled in accordance with NRCS CPS Nutrient Management (Code

590). If animal mortality is to be composted, use NRCS CPS Animal Mortality Facility (Code 316). If

animal manure solids are just being stored without managing for composting, use NRCS CPS Waste

Storage Facility (Code 313). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2005062EN.01000401.xml

| 12.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 March 2005

(2005/C 62/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3416 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4462 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69865 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0630 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5500 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,27 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,177 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5825 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,475 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4330 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9519 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 35 885 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,72 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,649 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7002 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6944 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6176 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4638 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8173 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1733 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 342,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8354 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3416

JPY

Japanese yen

139,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4462

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69865

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0630

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5500

ISK

Iceland króna

79,27

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,177

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5825

CZK

Czech koruna

29,475

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4330

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9519

ROL

Romanian leu

35 885

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,72

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,649

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7002

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6944

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6176

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4638

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8173

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1733

KRW

South Korean won

1 342,14

ZAR

South African rand

7,8354

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
NEWBERN,

SEPTEMBER TERM, 1795.

#### Cleary *v.*Coor and Hawks.

An entry "referred to A, B & C,” means a general reference of the cause, .nd not merely to audit ,.nd s¡ate the accounts. The award of arbitrators ought not to be set aside, unless in case where their decision is plainly and grossly against law ; not where the point decided might be doubtful.

This was a suit in Equity, to which the Defendant pleaded; and afterwards then1 was ati entry in these, words, “ Referred to A, (i & C.” Upon this th‘* re-fortes met, and returned an award — exceptions were, fif'd on the part of the Plaiuiiff: and at the last term anile to shew cause, why the award should not be confirmed was eon red on the record. And now at this term, *Davie*for the Plaintiff, insisted the referees were not appointed to act as arbitrators, but to state the account ; and that they had mistaken their powers. *Per curiam,*if the Intent had been to refer to them to audit and state the accounts, it would have been so mentioned, especially as there was a Master whose business it was to make such statement: neither would the court have ordered an ar-*259count to be taken, before the plea* wc-c argued or put to issue, and tried. Indeed by the last en ry, this seems to haw* been considered as an award by the counsel on both sides, who have mentioned it as an award. *Davis*then insisted, that this award ought to be sét asid bring against, law ; for ihai the arbitrators iiad allowed *Coor*a considerable sum for Ids service» as an administrator (this was admitted by *Coor,*now present in court, th at is to say, h“ admired they allowed ion *per cent,*in ’Ir- year 1779. upon the value of the goods in 1776,-which came to «hour an half per *cent-*or ,<m shillings on the real vahic) and he cited *BL Hep*363. 3 *Mk*494.

The court took time to consider, and having had before them, 1 *Atk*64. *Jacob, Verbo Arbitrators. 2 Brown 701.*1 *Brown*271. 1 *Stra.*301. *Salk. 71,*pl. 4—83. p*l.*1, they next, morning decided, that the -award of arbitrators ought not t" be set aside, unless in cases where their deei-ion is plainly and grossly ugains- law —not where the point decided might he doubtful. In the present case, although no such allowance ought to he made by the strict rules of law, that is a point not universally known arid dear; but the contrary is practised in almost all the County Courts in this State, hat is to say. the County Courts generally make such allowances Let the award be confirmed.

*Note.*— Vide *Jones*v. *Frazier,*1 *Hawks*379.
*May 10, 1932.*

#### Estate of Eisold, Sr.: Eisold and others, Appellants, vs. Eisold, Respondent.

For the appellants: *Arthur H. Gruhle*of Sheboygan and *Helmuth F. Arps*of Chilton.

For the respondent: *Buchen & Schlichting*of Sheboygan.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**GREATPLAINS ETHANOL, LLC**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned, Rick Serie,the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Great PlainsEthanol, LLC (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connectionwith the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”).

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certification as of the 31st day of March, 2006.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Rick Serie                                       |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Rick Serie                                           |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----