alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005143EN.01001101.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 April 2005

in Case C-441/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Conservation of natural habitats - Failure to transpose within the prescribed periods)

(2005/C 143/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-441/03: Action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 16 October 2003, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. van Beek) v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agents: H.G. Sevenster and N.A.J. Bel) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to bring into force within the prescribed periods all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the requirements of Article 4(1) and (2) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds and of Article 6(1) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, in conjunction with Articles 2(2), 1(a), (e) and (i), 6(2) to (4), 7, 11 and 15 thereof and by maintaining in force Article 13(4) of the Nature Conservancy Law (Natuurbeschermingswet), which is incompatible with Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to bring into force within the prescribed periods all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the requirements of Article 4(1) and (2) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds and of Article 6(1) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, in conjunction with Articles 2(2), 1(a), (e) and (i), 6(2) to (4), 7, 11 and 15 thereof and by maintaining in force Article 13(4) of the Nature Conservancy Law (Natuurbeschermingswet), which is incompatible with Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.

1

---
# C_2005006EN.01002001.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-143/04 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 6/38)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-143/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: K. Banks) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: A. Goldmann) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 17 March 2004 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: J.-P Puissochet, acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, S. von Bahr and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
# C_2004228EN.01002002.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/20

---

Action brought on 8 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-244/04)

(2004/C 228/40)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Gerald Braun and Enrico Traversa of its Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1) | declare the Federal Republic of Germany in breach of its obligations under Article 49 EC in that by its practice based on administrative circulars, it has consistently and disproportionately restricted the posting of non-member-country workers to Germany for the provision of services; |
| --- | --- |

1)

declare the Federal Republic of Germany in breach of its obligations under Article 49 EC in that by its practice based on administrative circulars, it has consistently and disproportionately restricted the posting of non-member-country workers to Germany for the provision of services;

| 2) | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Workers who are nationals of a non-Member State and are to be posted to Germany in order to provide a service require a ‘work visa’, which is only issued if the worker was employed by the undertaking making the posting for a minimum of one year prior to the posting.

In the view of the Commission, both (1) the practice based on an internal administrative instruction, of requiring a work permit in advance and (2) the issuing of such a permit only ‘Stammarbeitnehmer’ (regular/core workers) constitute an unjustified and disproportionate restriction on the freedom to provide services.

---
# C_2005106EN.01000901.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 24 February 2005

in Case C-225/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/106/EC - Maritime transport - Non-transposition within the period prescribed)

(2005/C 106/16)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-225/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Simonsson and M. Huttunen) v Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimares-Purokoski) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 1 June 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, G. Arestis (Rapporteur) and J. Klučka, Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 February 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Republic of Finland

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 amending Council Directive 95/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control), the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 amending Council Directive 95/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control), the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

1

---
# C_2004284EN.01001901.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/19

---

Action brought on 9 August 2004 by Jörg-Michael Fetzer against the European Parliament

(Case T-330/04)

(2004/C 284/39)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 August 2004 by Jörg-Michael Fetzer of Tübingen (Germany), represented by Matthias Bauer, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the defendant infringed the rights of the applicant in connection with Competition PE/96/A (Administrators); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the defendant infringed the rights of the applicant in connection with Competition PE/96/A (Administrators);

| — | admit the applicant to the second stage of a competition comparable with Competition PE/96/A; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the applicant to the second stage of a competition comparable with Competition PE/96/A;

| — | in the alternative, order the defendant to pay appropriate compensation, equivalent to at least one month's net salary. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order the defendant to pay appropriate compensation, equivalent to at least one month's net salary.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In July 2002, the applicant applied for Competition PE/96/A of the European Parliament. He stated in the application form that he was handicapped, in that his vision is reduced to two per cent of normal. According to the applicant, he was not allowed to write the test with a computer, being told that the examination conditions made no provision for compensating handicapped participants, and he was not given the extension of time which he requested.

The applicant argues that during the examination, owing to the difficulties arising from his handicap, it was nowhere near possible for him to read through all the questions in the allotted time and select the right answers. He argues that he belonged to the 180 best candidates and would therefore have been admitted to the next stage of the competition, if he had been given the requested compensation for his incapacity. He therefore seeks a declaration that he compensation he applied for was wrongly denied to him.

---
### Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

**Plant ID** 00001 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1** 

### File Name **Description** x 05183\05183_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file 05183\05183_Certification Statement .pdf Plant certification statement 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_EPAWTRBA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05183\05183_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 05183\05183_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

### Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
.**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05183**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 05183\05183_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05183\05183_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05183\05183_Certification Statement .pdf Plant certification statement x 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_EPAWTRBA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05183\05183_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05183\05183_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-31911) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Sterile
Recoveries, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sterile Recoveries, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Tampa, Florida
February 14, 2000, except for paragraph 2
    of Note E, as to which
    the date is March 24, 2000.
326007

March 6, 2015 

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Third Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711 

RE: No. 03-15-00121-CV; Tom Benson v. The State of Texas 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

I will be the lead counsel for the State of Texas in the above-referenced appeal. 

My mailing address is: 

Travis County Attorney’s Office

P. O. Box 1748 

Austin, Texas 78767 

My e-mail address is tim.labadie@traviscountytx.gov and my State Bar No. is 

11784853. 

Please take notice that the State of Texas does not oppose Mr. Benson’s Motion to 

Determine Proper Designation of Case and Appropriate Appellate Filing Fee, which 

was filed on March 6, 2015. 

 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

 Sincerely,

 /s/ Tim Labadie

 Tim Labadie

Assistant Travis County Attorney

c: Mr. Tom Benson (via e.mail: tomrbenson@gmail.com) 

DAVID A. ESCAMILLA

COUNTY ATTORNEY

STEPHEN H. CAPELLE

FIRST ASSISTANT

JAMES W. COLLINS

EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT

314 W. 11 T H ST., SUITE 500

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

P. O. BOX 1748

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78767

(512) 854 - 9513

FAX: (512) 854 - 4808

ENFORCEMENT DIVISION

SHARON TALLEY , DIRECTOR

TIM LABADIE

GARY D. MARTIN

NEIL KUCERA

ANNALYNN COX

RYAN FITE

INGRID ELLERBEE

ACCEPTED

03-15-00121-CV

4399793

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/6/2015 12:53:57 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/6/2015 12:53:57 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1163 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1163

     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

 Mr. Udall (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Tester, Mr. 
 Franken, Mr. Heinrich, and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Languages 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 803C of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
2991b-3) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(7)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``10'' and 
                inserting ``5''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``15'' and 
                inserting ``10''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or 3-year basis'' and inserting 
                ``3-year, 4-year, or 5-year basis''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, 4-year, or 5-year'' after ``on 
                a 3-year''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 816(e) of the Native American Programs Act 
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is amended by striking ``2008, 2009, 2010, 
2011, and 2012'' and inserting ``2016 through 2020''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 816 of the Native American 
Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended in subsections (a) 
and (b) by striking ``subsection (e)'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``subsection (d)''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004314EN.01001303.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-54/02: Vereins- und Westbank AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Competition - Article 81 EC - Price-fixing agreement and ways of charging for currency exchange services - Germany - Procedure in default)

(2004/C 314/34)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-54/02: Vereins- und Westbank AG, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by J. Schulte, M Ewen and A. Neus, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty — (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) (OJ 2003 L 15, p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 97 of 20.4.2002.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2023

Subscribe to receive our news releases by email.

JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches
----

-----

---

'D 

'D 

,, 

'=" OJ 

a 

a 

LI'\ 

1'1'1 

----· 

r..h~~;;; u f-__ _ 

Approved for Release: 2017 /01 /25 C05096448.E VIA J .. JUC ~ECRET KEYHOLE CllANN£lS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY ONLY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14 000097300 

1 5 AUG 1966 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE (NRO) 

SUBJECT: Briefing of NASA Officials 

Reference: Memorandum of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, subject: 

Department of Defense Needs for Earth Sensing Satellites, dated 30 

August 1965. 

The Army has recently completed a contract to determine the 

feasibility of deriving military geographic and related engineering 

data from the 3-inch DAFF satellite photography. 

The contract resulted in a photomosaic of the continent of Africa, 

from which highly successful studies on surface configuration, surface 

water, engineering geology, surface materials, vegetation, cultural 

features and climatology were made. The results have been presented to 

Army staffs, DIA and STRICOM. Requirements for this information are 

increasing as its significance becomes apparent to prospective users. 

Planning is now underway by NASA to undertake development of these 

type studies, using satellite photography, at vast expense to the government. As an attempt to reduce this costly duplication of effort, we 

propose that the Administrator and/or Deputy Administrator of NASA be 

briefed on the success of the DOD studies. 

Brigadier General Stewart of your office was briefed on this project, 

in your behalf, on 10 August 1966 and we understand he presented the above 

information to you. In accordance with the referenced memorandum, authority 

is requested to brief the NASA officials, as agreed to in our discussion of 

15 August 1966. 

Cha es L. Po or ------. 

t? Assistant ::;. :·:· · V!.ry cf the Army \Rm}' 

TCS -350089/bb 

+eP SEeRET 

HANDLE VIA 

K HOiE CHANHHS 

ONLY 

Approved for Release: 2017 /01 /25 C05096448