alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1341; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-47]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Cleveland, TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal 
Register of March 6, 2013, to establish Class E airspace at Cleveland 
Regional Jetport, Cleveland, TN, is being withdrawn. Upon review, the 
FAA found that, for clarity, combining this proposed rulemaking with 
another proposal to amend existing airspace is necessary.

DATES: As of June 17, 2013, the proposed rule published March 6, 2013, 
at 78 FR 14475, is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On March 6, 2013, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register 
establishing Class E airspace at Cleveland, TN to accommodate new 
standard instrument approach procedures for Cleveland Regional Jetport 
(78 FR 14475). Subsequent to publication the FAA found that existing 
information for Bradley Memorial Hospital was omitted in the Cleveland, 
TN proposed rule. Also, there is another proposed rulemaking for 
Dayton, TN, with Bradley Memorial Hospital information. To avoid 
confusion this proposed rule is being withdrawn and will be combined 
with the Dayton, TN, proposed rulemaking.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71:

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, as published in the Federal Register on March 
6, 2013 (78 FR 14475) (FR Doc 2013-05210.), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 28, 2013.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-13103 Filed 6-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy & Technology

Final Agenda

January 20-21, 2011

Hilton Garden Inn 

815 14th Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: 1-202-783-7800 

Thursday, January 20, 2011

8:30 am Registration

9:00 am Welcoming Remarks and Introductions

Mark Joyce

Associate Director and NACEPT Acting Designated Federal Officer

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach (OFACMO)

Cynthia Jones-Jackson

Acting Director, OFACMO

9:15 am Overview of Agenda

Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.

NACEPT Chair

9:30 am Remarks by Administrator Lisa P. Jackson 

10:30 am Break

10:45 am Vulnerable Populations Panel Discussion

Mark A. Mitchell, M.D., MPH

NACEPT Vulnerable Populations Co-Chair 

Fred S. Hauchman

Director, Office of Science Policy

Office of Research and Development
2

Peter Grevatt, PhD

Director, Office of Children’s Health Protection

Office of the Administrator

Heather Case

Acting Director, Office of Environmental Justice

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

Victoria Robinson

Designated Federal Officer

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC)

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

12:15 pm Lunch (on your own)

1:45 pm Application of Science and Technology to Community Exposure and Risk

Assessment

Andrew M. Geller, PhD

Chief, Exposure Modeling Research Branch

National Exposure Research Laboratory

Office of Research and Development

2:30 pm Overview of NACEPT Advice Letters on EPA Workforce Development

Robert L. Olson

NACEPT Workforce Issues Workgroup Co-Chair

Nanci E. Gelb

Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator

Office of Administration and Resources Management

3:30 pm Break

3:45 pm Public Comments 

4:00 pm Discussion and Approval of Initial NACEPT Advice Letter on EPA Workforce 

Planning: Scientific and Technical Competencies to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges

4:30 pm Workforce Issues and Vulnerable Populations Workgroups meet in separate, 

concurrent sessions. 

6:00 pm ADJOURN
3

Friday, January 21, 2011

8:30 am Workforce Issues and Vulnerable Populations Workgroups meet in separate, 

concurrent sessions.

11:00 am Break

11:15 am Workgroup Updates (Reconvene in Plenary)

12:30 pm Public Comments 

12:45 pm Chair’s Summary and Next Steps

2:00 pm ADJOURN
# C_2004300EN.01003702.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/37

---

Removal from the register of Case C-237/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 300/72)

By order of 22 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-237/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal d'instance de Roubaix): SA Banque Sofinco v Daniel Djemoui, Carole Djemoui.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 du 2.8.2003.

1

---
March 2 4 , 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Yuhasz

HDV Productions

842 Cranberry Lane

Akron, OH 44313

Dear Mr. Yuhasz :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 23 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of HDV Productions into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0464 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consid er the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to sup port your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7541

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JAMES EDDIE PALMER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:93

- cr - 00090

- AWA

- 2; 2:17

- cv - 00217

- AWA )

Submitted : January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Stephen Westley Haynie, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United St ates Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Eddie Palmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny ing relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessm ent of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both t hat the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Palmer has not made the requ isite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                   May 8, 2001



VIA FACSIMILE: (214) 290-2332                     VIA FACSIMILE: (214) 920-4209
-----------------------------                     -----------------------------

Mr. Wm. Mark Cranmer                              Mr. John L. Clark
Vice President                                    Vice President
Bank One, NA                                      Union Bank of California, N.A.
1717 Main Street                                  500 N. Akard St., Suite 4200
Dallas, Texas 75201                               Dallas, Texas 75201

     Re:  Seventh Restated Loan Agreement among Clayton  Williams Energy,  Inc.,
          Warrior Gas Co., CWEI Acquisitions,  Inc., Bank One, NA and Union Bank
          of California, N.A. (The "Loan Agreement")

Dear Messrs. Cranmer and Clark:

     This letter is to confirm our recent discussion regarding the provisions of
Section 13(c) of the Loan Agreement.

     By your signature below, Bank One, NA and Union Bank of California, N.A.
agree that the Williams Consolidated Entities' ratio of Current Assets to
Current Liabilities during each quarter of 2001 shall not be less than .5 to 1
as of the end of such calendar quarters.



                                           Very truly yours,


                                            /s/ Mel G. Riggs
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Mel G. Riggs,
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.


<PAGE>


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

Bank One, NA,
a national association


By: /s/ William Mark Cranmer
   ---------------------------------------
        Wm. Mark Cranmer,
        Vice President



Union Bank of California, N.A.,
a national banking association


By: /s/ John A. Clark
   --------------------------------------
      John A. Clark,
      Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02076]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

January 29, 2015.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., February 10, 2015.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: It was determined by a unanimous vote of the 
Commissioners that the Commission consider and act upon the following 
in closed session: Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. 
WEVA 2014-82-R, et al. (Issues include whether to grant or deny the 
Secretary of Labor's Emergency Motion for Stay of ALJ's Order 
Dismissing Pattern-of-Violations Notice.) A certification regarding the 
closure of the meeting will be placed on the Commission's Web site 
(www.fmshrc.gov). Commission employees shall not attend this meeting 
unless they have been assigned to work on this case with Commissioners.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-02076 Filed 1-29-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
# C_2004141EN.01000101.xml

| 25.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 May 2004

(2004/C 141/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1968 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4403 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6683 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,097 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5351 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,44 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9463 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5858 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,755 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4526 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6545 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4254 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6405 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 730 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,71 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,165 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 839 790 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7115 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6391 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3265 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9627 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0523 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 408,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0419 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1968

JPY

Japanese yen

134,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4403

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6683

SEK

Swedish krona

9,097

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5351

ISK

Iceland króna

87,44

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9463

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5858

CZK

Czech koruna

31,755

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4526

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6545

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4254

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6405

ROL

Romanian leu

40 730

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,71

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,165

TRL

Turkish lira

1 839 790

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7115

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6391

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3265

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9627

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0523

KRW

South Korean won

1 408,63

ZAR

South African rand

8,0419

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger GP Trust, sole
general partner of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating
     Partnership for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report")
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

                                      /s/ Stanley K. Tanger
   Dated:  May 7, 2004                ---------------------------------
           --------------------       Stanley K. Tanger
                                      Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust
                                      Sole General Partner of the Registrant
# Section 333 Exemption Petition OPERATION NEAR AIRPORTS
1/4 /1 6 Battery Ion, inc. UAS Airport A Airport B Note: UAS is not to scale and is elevated higher than permitted only to illustrate operation's distance from airports. 

### Certificate Of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for operations under 200' AGL if: *5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or *3 NM from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an operational tower; or *2 NM from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower Figure 1

# Section 333 Exemption Petition OPERATIONS NEAR OFF AIRPORT HELIPORTS
1/4/16 Battery Ion, inc. Ground Heliport FATO (0' AGL) Imaginary protected air space 8':1' Flight Path 0' AGL 2 Nautical Miles from Final Approach Take Off Area (FATO) sUAS operating air space. Figure 2 

### Certificate Of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for operations under 200' AGL if: *2 NM from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure 200' - 500' AGL

# Section 333 Exemption Petition ON PROPERTY OPERATIONS AIRSPACE
1/4/16 Battery Ion, inc. Property Line 500' AGL Pilot In Command sUAS Landing/Take Off area Observer Figure 3 200' AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,691
<SECURITIES>                                    19,804
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,154)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,052
<PP&E>                                          11,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,431)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,166
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,180
<SALES>                                         38,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,574
<CGS>                                           13,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  88
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     73
<INCOME-TAX>                                       517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (444)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis and Computational Predictions of CHF Position and Post-CHF Heat Transfer (NUREG/IA-0236)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0236 (PDF - 1.21 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**May 2010

**Prepared by:** B. Belhouachi, S.P. Walker, G.F. Hewitt

Nuclear Research Group Mechanical Engineering Department Imperial College  London SW7 2BX UK 

**Prepared as part of**: The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objective of the current study is to investigate the capability of the US NRC TRACE code to predict the Critical Heat Flux (CHF) position and temperature profiles for different axial heat flux distributions in the reflooding of a hot single tube. Measurements of each of Bennett, Keeys and Becker were used for this.

Hydrodynamic and post-dryout heat transfer calculations were performed using TRACE Code. CHF and critical quality correlations (based on the ‘look-up' tables of Groeneveld, the ‘local conditions' hypothesis, and the boiling length/quality relationship) are usually implemented in system codes. Each of these has been used to analyze the experiments. These simulations showed that generally the CHF position was well predicted whereas the estimation of the wall temperature was not correct for particular ranges of mass and heat fluxes. This is investigated and possible causes, associated with ‘local conditions' issues, are proposed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Equity Appreciation Plan, 1996 Stock Option Plan
and 1998 Stock Option Plan of DTM Corporation of our report dated February
5,1999, except for Note 14 as to which the date is February 19, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of DTM Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                           /S/ Ernst & Young LLP
Austin, Texas
March 26, 1999

                                       1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION        1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverstar Holdings,        Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),        I, Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in        all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the        Company.

Date: May 15, 2008

| /s/ Clive Kabatznik                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clive Kabatznik                                                              |
| Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive                        Officer) |

 

[A signed original of this written statement required by        Section 906 has been provided to Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by        Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its        staff upon request.]

 

37
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00168-CR

Edward VARGAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6559

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 7, 2014.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice