5704 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Western Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue, 

15000 SW., Renton, WA 98055. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to remove the segment 

of J–3 that extends from the Spokane 

VORTAC to Cranbrook, BC. The route 

terminates at the EDGES fix located on 

the United States and Canadian border. 

The FAA has determined that this 

segment of J–3 is not required since the 

Jet Route, as currently described, 

terminates or originates at a point in 

space on the international border and 

does not meet or connect to any 

corresponding airway within Canadian 

airspace. Additionally, the segment 

between the Spokane VORTAC and 

Cranbrook, BC VOR/DME causes 

confusion because it appears that pilots 

can file a flight plan all the way to the 

Cranbrook, BC VOR/DME, however, the 

computer rejects the flight plans filed to 

the Cranbrook, BC VOR/DME. 

Jet Routes are published in paragraph 

2004 of FAA Order 7400.9T, dated 

August 27, 2009 and effective 

September 15, 2009, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Jet Route listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies a Jet Route from Oakland, 

CA, to Spokane, WA. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 27, 2009 and 

effective September 15, 2009, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes. 

* * * * * 

J–3 [Modified] 

From Oakland, CA, via Red Bluff, CA; 

Lakeview, OR; Kimberly, OR; Spokane, WA. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, January 25, 

2010. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Manager, Airspace and Rules Group. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2471 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0003; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ANE–104] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Modification of Jet Routes 

J–37 and J–55; Northeast United 

States 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify Jet Routes J–37 and J–55 in the 

Northeast United States (U.S.) by 

terminating the routes at a navigation 

aid prior to the U.S./Canadian Border. 

This change is proposed to resolve flight 

plan processing issues between U.S. and 

Canadian air traffic control (ATC) 

systems. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2010–0003 and 

Airspace Docket No. 09–ANE–104 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace and Rules Group, 

Office of System Operations Airspace 

and AIM, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2010–0003 and Airspace Docket No. 09– 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules 5705 

ANE–104) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2010–0003 and 

Airspace Docket No. 09–ANE–104.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ 

air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Eastern Service Center, Operations 

Support Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 210, 1701 

Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to modify Jet Route 

J–37 by terminating the route at the 

Massena, NY, very high frequency 

omnidirectional range/tactical air 

navigation (VORTAC) aid. J–37 

currently terminates at a point where 

the Massena VORTAC 037° (T) radial 

intersects the U.S./Canadian border. 

Wherein J–37 terminates at the 

international boundary rather than a 

navigation aid or fix imposes flight plan 

processing issues between U.S. En 

Route Automation Modernization 

(ERAM) and Canadian ATC facilities. 

The proposed change would eliminate 

the short segment of J–37 that extends 

between the Massena VORTAC and the 

U.S./Canadian border. Four other 

existing Jet Routes that terminate at the 

Massena VORTAC provide connectivity 

between J–37 and routes that extend 

into Canadian airspace. 

The FAA is also proposing an 

amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to modify 

Jet Route J–55 by terminating that route 

at the Presque Isle, ME, VOR/distance 

measuring equipment (DME) aid. This 

would eliminate the segment of J–55 

that extends between the Presque Isle 

VOR/DME and the Mont Joli, PQ, 

Canada VOR/DME. 

All radials in the J–37 and J–55 legal 

descriptions in this NPRM are stated in 

reference to True North only. 

Jet routes are published in paragraph 

2004 of FAA Order 7400.9T dated 

August 27, 2009 and effective 

September 15, 2009, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The jet routes listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in subtitle 

VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. 

Under that section, the FAA is charged 

with prescribing regulations to assign 

the use of the airspace necessary to 

ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies the route structure as 

required to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal is not subject to 

environmental review because all 

proposed actions relate to flight above 

Flight Level 180 in accordance with 

FAA Memorandums dated January 17, 

2001 and September 25, 2003 related to 

the altitude cut-off to be used in 

determining the study areas for 

environmental analyses. Additionally, if 

environmental review were required, 

this proposed action would qualify for 

categorical exclusion in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ 

Paragraph 311a. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, Dated August 27, 2009 and 

effective September 15, 2009, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes. 

* * * * * 

J–37 [Amended] 

From Hobby, TX, via INT of the Hobby 

090° and Harvey, LA, 266° radials; Harvey; 

Semmes, AL; Montgomery, AL; Spartanburg, 

SC; Lynchburg, VA; Gordonsville, VA; 

Brooke, VA; INT Brooke 067° and Coyle, NJ, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
5706 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

226° radials; to Coyle. From Kennedy, NY; 

Kingston, NY; Albany, NY; Massena, NY. 

* * * * * 

J–55 [Amended] 

From Dolphin, FL; INT Dolphin 331° and 

Gators, FL, 160° radials; INT Gators 160° and 

Craig, FL, 192° radials; Craig; INT Craig 004° 

and Savannah, GA, 193° radials; Savannah; 

Charleston, SC; Florence, SC; INT Florence 

003° and Raleigh-Durham, NC, 224° radials; 

Raleigh-Durham; INT Raleigh-Durham 035° 

and Hopewell, VA, 234° radials; Hopewell; 

INT Hopewell 030° and Nottingham, MD, 

174° radials. From Sea Isle, NJ; INT Sea Isle 

050° and Hampton, NY, 223° radials; 

Hampton; Providence, RI; Boston, MA; 

Kennebunk, ME; Presque Isle, ME. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 26, 

2010. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Manager, Airspace & Rules Group. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2468 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Parts 201 and 203 

[Docket No. FR–5075–N–02] 

RIN 2502–AI45 

Federal Housing Administration: 

Insurance for Manufactured Housing: 

Reopening of Public Comment Period 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing 

Commissioner, HUD. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of 

public comment period. 

SUMMARY: On September 15, 2008, HUD 

published a proposed rule entitled 

‘‘Federal Housing Administration: 

Insurance for Manufactured Housing.’’ 

The comment period for the proposed 

rule ended on November 14, 2008. This 

notice identifies an additional issue 

related to the rule that has resulted from 

HUD’s implementation of a June 2008 

final rule pertaining to the federal 

manufactured home installation 

program. Accordingly, HUD reopens the 

comment period for the proposed rule to 

present this additional issue for 

consideration in relation to the 

September 2008 proposed rule and to 

solicit public comment only on this 

additional issue. 

DATES: Comment Due Date: March 8, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposed rule to the Regulations 

Division, Office of General Counsel, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street, SW., 

Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410– 

0500. There are two methods for 

submitting public comments. All 

submissions must refer to the above 

docket number and title. 

1. Submission of Comments by Mail. 

Comments may be submitted by mail to 

the Regulations Division, Office of 

General Counsel, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, 451 

7th Street, SW., Room 10276, 

Washington, DC 20410–0001. 

2. Electronic Submission of 

Comments. Interested persons may 

submit comments electronically through 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

http://www.regulations.gov. HUD 

strongly encourages commenters to 

submit comments electronically. 

Electronic submission of comments 

allows the commenter maximum time to 

prepare and submit a comment, ensures 

timely receipt by HUD, and enables 

HUD to make them immediately 

available. Comments submitted 

electronically through the http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site can be 

viewed by other commenters and 

interested members of the public. 

Commenters should follow the 

instructions provided on that site to 

submit comments electronically. 

Note: To receive consideration as public 

comments, comments must be submitted 

through one of the two methods specified 

above. Again, all submissions must refer to 

the docket number and title of the rule. 

No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile 

(FAX) comments are not acceptable. 

Public Inspection of Public 

Comments. All properly submitted 

comments and communications 

submitted to HUD will be available for 

public inspection and copying between 

8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above 

address. Due to security measures at the 

HUD Headquarters building, an advance 

appointment to review the public 

comments must be scheduled by calling 

the Regulations Division at 202–708– 

3055 (this is not a toll-free number). 

Individuals with speech or hearing 

impairments may access this number 

via TTY by calling the Federal 

Information Relay Service at 800–877– 

8339. Copies of all comments submitted 

are available for inspection and 

downloading at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Gillispie, Home Valuation Policy 

Division, Office of Housing, Department 

of Housing and Urban Development, 

451 7th Street, SW., Room 9270, 

Washington, DC 20410–8000, telephone 

number 202–708–2121 (this is not a tollfree number). Individuals with speech 

or hearing impairments may access this 

number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service 

at 800–877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD 

published a proposed rule on September 

15, 2008 (73 FR 53346), that would 

amend HUD’s regulations governing 

manufactured homes that are to be the 

security for Federal Housing 

Administration (FHA) Title I-insured 

loans and Title II-insured mortgages. 

The September 15, 2008 rule proposed 

to permit, as eligible for FHA insurance, 

mortgages on manufactured homes to be 

installed in accordance with the Model 

Installation Standards, which were the 

subject of notice and rulemaking that 

resulted in a final rule published on 

October 19, 2007. Current regulations 

provide that manufactured homes that 

are to be the security for FHA Title Iinsured loans must be installed in 

accordance with the manufacturer’s 

requirements or erected on a permanent 

foundation, and manufactured homes 

that are to be the security for Title IIinsured mortgages must be erected on a 

permanent foundation. Acceptance of 

mortgages on manufactured homes 

installed in accordance with the Model 

Installation Standards would provide 

for greater flexibility of design, thereby 

permitting additional options for 

affordable housing. Under the proposal 

presented by the September 15, 2008 

proposed rule, FHA mortgage insurance 

would become available for eligible 

manufactured homes in all states and 

territories, upon promulgation of a final 

rule. 

On June 20, 2008, HUD published a 

final rule entitled ‘‘Manufactured Home 

Installation Program,’’ which established 

a federal manufactured home 

installation program in accordance with 

the National Manufactured Housing 

Construction and Safety Standards Act 

of 1974, as amended by the 

Manufactured Housing Act of 2000. The 

June 20, 2008, final rule governs the 

HUD-administered installation program 

that will operate in a state, unless that 

state certifies that it has its own 

qualifying program and HUD reviews 

the program and accepts it as meeting or 

exceeding the requirements HUD would 

apply in a HUD-administered state. The 

June 20, 2008 final rule also provides for 

HUD’s conditional acceptance, rather 

than full acceptance, of a state program 

that meets some but not all of the 

minimum standards. However, there 

have been some delays in submissions 

of state certifications, in HUD’s review 

and acceptance of state certifications, 

and in implementation of HUD’s 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS