6906 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

administrative requirement. Any benefit 

derived from the use of an AVA name 

would be the result of a proprietor’s 

efforts and consumer acceptance of 

wines from that area. Therefore, no 

regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required. 

Executive Order 12866 

It has been determined that this final 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

as defined by Executive Order 12866 of 

September 30, 1993. Therefore, no 

regulatory assessment is required. 

Drafting Information 

Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations 

and Rulings Division drafted this final 

rule. 

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 

Wine. 

The Regulatory Amendment 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter 

I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as 

follows: 

PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL 

AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. 

Subpart C—Approved American 

Viticultural Areas 

■ 2. Subpart C is amended by adding 

§ 9.249 to read as follows: 

§ 9.249 The Rocks District of Milton– 

Freewater. 

(a) Name. The name of the viticultural 

area described in this section is ‘‘The 

Rocks District of Milton-Freewater’’. For 

purposes of part 4 of this chapter, ‘‘The 

Rocks District of Milton-Freewater’’ and 

‘‘The Rocks of Milton-Freewater’’ are 

terms of viticultural significance. 

(b) Approved maps. The two United 

States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale 

topographic maps used to determine the 

boundary of The Rocks District of 

Milton-Freewater viticultural area are 

titled: 

(1) Milton-Freewater, Oreg., 1964; and 

(2) Bowlus Hill, Oreg., 1964; 

photoinspected 1976. 

(c) Boundary. The Rocks District of 

Milton-Freewater viticultural area is 

located in Umatilla County, Oregon. The 

boundary of The Rocks District of 

Milton-Freewater viticultural area is as 

follows: 

(1) The beginning point is found on 

the Milton-Freewater map at the 

intersection of an unnamed mediumduty road known locally as Freewater 

Highway (State Route 339) and an 

unnamed light-duty road known locally 

as Crockett Road, section 26, T6N/R35E. 

From the beginning point, proceed eastsoutheasterly in a straight line for 0.8 

mile to the intersection of State 

Highway 11 (Oregon-Washington 

Highway) and an unnamed light-duty 

road known locally as Appleton Road, 

section 25, T6N/R35E; then 

(2) Proceed southeasterly in a straight 

line for 1.05 miles, crossing onto the 

Bowlus Hill map, to the intersection of 

three unnamed light-duty roads known 

locally as Grant Road, Turbyne Road, 

and Pratt Lane on the common 

boundary between section 36, T6N/

R35E, and section 31, T5N/R36E; then 

(3) Proceed southwesterly in a straight 

line for 1.1 miles, crossing back onto the 

Milton-Freewater map, to the 

intersection of the Union Pacific 

railroad tracks with the Walla Walla 

River, section 1, T5N/R35E; then 

(4) Proceed southwesterly and then 

west-northwesterly along the Union 

Pacific railroad tracks for 1.2 miles to 

the intersection of the railroad tracks 

with the 980-foot elevation contour line, 

approximately 0.15 mile west of Lamb 

Street, section 2, T5N/R35E; then 

(5) Proceed west-northwesterly in a 

straight line for 2.25 miles to the 

intersection of the 840-foot elevation 

contour line and an unnamed light-duty 

road known locally as Lower Dry Creek 

Road, section 33, T6N/R35E; then 

(6) Proceed northwesterly in a straight 

line for 0.8 mile to the intersection of 

the 800-foot elevation contour line with 

an unnamed light-duty road running 

north-south in section 32, T6N/R35E; 

then 

(7) Proceed easterly in a straight line 

for 0.9 mile to the intersection of the 

840-foot elevation contour line with the 

Hudson Bay Canal, section 33, T6N/

R35E; then 

(8) Proceed due north in a straight 

line for 0.25 mile to the line’s 

intersection with Sunnyside Road, 

section 33, T6N/T35E; then 

(9) Proceed northeasterly in a straight 

line for 0.5 mile to the intersection of 

the 840-foot elevation contour line with 

an unnamed medium-duty road known 

locally as State Highway 332 (Umapine 

Highway), eastern boundary of section 

28, R6N/T35E; then 

(10) Proceed east-northeasterly in a 

straight line for 0.3 mile to the 

intersection of three unnamed light-duty 

roads known locally as Triangle Road, 

Hodgen Road, and Appleton Road, 

section 27, T6N/R35E; then 

(11) Proceed east-northeasterly in a 

straight line for 1.25 miles, returning to 

the beginning point. 

Signed: December 2, 2014. 

John J. Manfreda, 

Administrator. 

Approved: December 22, 2014. 

Timothy E. Skud, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and 

Tariff Policy). 

[FR Doc. 2015–02553 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2015–0050] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Willamette River, Portland, OR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation 

from drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe Railway Bridge, also 

known as the St. Johns RR Bridge, 

across the Willamette River, mile 6.9, at 

Portland, OR. The deviation is necessary 

to facilitate installation of new rail 

joints. This deviation allows the bridge 

to remain in the closed to navigation 

position during maintenance activities. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

7 a.m. on February 12, 2015 to noon on 

February 13, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2015–0050] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. You may 

also visit the Docket Management 

Facility in Room W12–140 on the 

ground floor of the Department of 

Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Mr. Steven 

Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Coast 

Guard Thirteenth District; telephone 

206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway 


rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 6907 

1 1 40 CFR 51.1008 (a)(2) and (b) do not apply for 

the Nogales area because they relate to requirements 

for attainment demonstrations and reasonable 

further progress (RFP); these requirements were 

suspended for the Nogales PM2.5 nonattainment 

area so long as the area continues to meet the PM2.5

standard. For further discussion of our Clean Data 

Policy as applied to the Nogales area, refer to our 

proposed rule (77 FR 65656, October 30, 2012) and 

final rule (78 FR 887, January 7, 2013). 

2Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) recently 

remanded this rule and directed EPA to repromulgate it pursuant to subpart 4 of part D, title 

I of the CAA (see Natural Resources Defense 

Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013)), the 

court’s ruling in this case does not affect EPA’s 

action on these emissions inventories. Subpart 4 of 

part D, title I of the Act contains no specific 

provision governing emissions inventories for PM10

or PM2.5 nonattainment areas that supersedes the 

general emissions inventory requirement for all 

nonattainment areas in CAA section 172(c)(3). See 

‘‘State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for 

the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498, (April 16, 

1992). 

requested this deviation to facilitate the 

installation of new rail joints on the 

bridge. The bridge, also known as the St. 

Johns Railway Bridge, crosses the 

Willamette River at mile 6.9 and 

provides 54 feet of vertical clearance 

above Columbia River Datum 0.0 while 

in the closed position. Under normal 

operations, this bridge opens on signal 

as required by 33 CFR 117.5. The 

deviation period is from 7 a.m. to noon 

on February 12, 2015; from 7 a.m. to 

noon on February 13, 2015. This 

deviation allows the lift span of the 

BNSF Railway Bridge across the 

Willamette River, mile 6.9, to remain in 

the closed to navigation position, and 

need not open for maritime traffic 

during the periods listed above. The 

bridge shall operate in accordance with 

33 CFR 117.5 at all other times. BNSF 

will entertain requests from mariners to 

change the above listed schedule for 

emergent vessel arrivals or departures 

that are dependent on water level, given 

72 hours advanced notice. The BNSF 

contact is Jeff Swanson, who can be 

reached at (701) 412–6593. Waterway 

usage on this part of the Willamette 

River includes vessels ranging from 

commercial tug and barge to small 

pleasure craft. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed positions may do so 

at any time. The BNSF Railway Bridge 

will not be able to open for emergencies, 

and there is no immediate alternate 

route for vessels to pass. The Coast 

Guard will also inform the users of the 

waterways through our Local and 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the 

change in operating schedule for the 

bridge so that vessels can arrange their 

transits to minimize any impact caused 

by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: January 27, 2015. 

Steven M. Fischer, 

Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02475 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0450; FRL–9922–74– 

Region 9] 

Revision to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan; Nogales 

Nonattainment Area; Fine Particulate 

Matter Emissions Inventories 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve revisions to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning 

the Nogales fine particle (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area 2008 and 2010 

emissions inventories. These emission 

inventories were submitted for the 2006 

24-hour fine particle (PM2.5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). We are approving these 

annual emissions inventories under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule will be effective on 

March 11, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0450 for 

this action. In most cases, documents in 

the docket for this action are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On September 2, 2014, EPA proposed 

to approve and incorporate into the 

Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

the PM2.5 emissions inventories for the 

Nogales nonattainment area titled 

‘‘Arizona State Implementation Plan 

Revision for the Nogales PM2.5

Nonattainment Area’’ (79 FR 51923). 

Submitted by Arizona on September 6, 

2013, the Nogales area emissions 

inventories provide annual 2008 and 

2010 emissions estimates (tons per year) 

for PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors (i.e., 

nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs), sulfur dioxide 

(SO2), and ammonia (NH3)). The source 

categories include non-road mobile 

sources, non-point sources, on-road 

mobile sources, and point or stationary 

sources. The detailed Nogales emissions 

inventories are found in Appendix A of 

Arizona’s submittal. 

We proposed to approve this revision 

to the Arizona SIP because we 

determined that it complied with the 

relevant CAA requirements. EPA’s 

requirements for an emissions inventory 

for the PM2.5 NAAQS are set forth in 40 

CFR 51.1008.1 2 We reviewed the results, 

procedures, and methodologies Arizona 

used to produce the 2008 and 2010 

Nogales area PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor 

emissions inventories and found that 

these emissions inventories meet the 

requirements of the CAA and EPA 

guidance. Consequently, we proposed to 

approve the submitted PM2.5, NH3, NOX, 

SO2, and VOC emissions inventories as 

meeting the CAA’s section 172(c)(3) 

requirement to provide a 

comprehensive, accurate, and current 

inventory of actual emissions for the 

Nogales nonattainment area. 

Our proposed action provides more 

information on Arizona’s PM2.5

emissions inventories submittal and our 

evaluation (79 FR 51923, September 2, 

2014). 


rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES