alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005057EN.01001501.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/15 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, by decision of that court of 30 November 2004, in the case of Uroplasty B.V. against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane District Rotterdam

(Case C-514/04)

(2005/C 57/29)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, (Amsterdam Regional Court of Appeal) (Netherlands) of 30 November 2004, received at the Court Registry on 15 December 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Uroplasty B.V. against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane District Rotterdam on the following questions:

| 1. | (a)
Must heading 9021 of the CCT be interpreted as meaning that a product consisting of sterile, white flakes of polydimethylsiloxane, specially developed and intended solely for use as a medical/surgical implant, can be classified under that heading? (b)
If so, under which subheading of heading 9021 of the CCT must the product be classified? | (a) | Must heading 9021 of the CCT be interpreted as meaning that a product consisting of sterile, white flakes of polydimethylsiloxane, specially developed and intended solely for use as a medical/surgical implant, can be classified under that heading? | (b) | If so, under which subheading of heading 9021 of the CCT must the product be classified? |
| --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| (a) | Must heading 9021 of the CCT be interpreted as meaning that a product consisting of sterile, white flakes of polydimethylsiloxane, specially developed and intended solely for use as a medical/surgical implant, can be classified under that heading? | | | | |
| (b) | If so, under which subheading of heading 9021 of the CCT must the product be classified? | | | | |

| 2. | If heading 9021 is not possible in this case, is the product eligible for classification under heading 3926 of the CCT? |
| -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| 3. | If not, classification under which other heading results from the interpretation of the CCT? |
| -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

---
Exhibit 10.4

                          EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM

THIS EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT ADDENDUM,  is a supplement to the original EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT   dated  January  1,  1995,  by  and  between   MATRIX  CAPITAL  BANK,
(hereinafter  referred to as the "Bank") and GARY LENZO (hereinafter referred to
as the "Employee").

WHEREAS,  the Employee has heretofore been employed by the Bank as President and
Chief Executive Officer, and

WHEREAS,  THE Bank wishes to assure  itself of the  services of the  Employee as
outlined in Section 5. Term of the original Employment Agreement, and

WHEREAS,  the  parties  desire  by  this  writing  to set  forth  the  continued
employment relationship of the Bank and the Employee.

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed to amend Section 2. Base Compensation and Section 5.
Term as follows: ------------------ ----

2.   Base  Compensation.  The Bank agrees to pay the Employee during the term of
     this  Addendum,  a salary at the rate of $175,000 per annum payable in cash
     not less frequently  than twice monthly and shall be increased  annually in
     such an amount as the Board of Directors may determine.

5.   Term. This Addendum  extends the period of employment an additional  twelve
     (12) months,  per  performance  evaluation  by the Board of  Directors,  as
     outlined in the original Employment Contract, thereby extending the term of
     said Employment Agreement to January 1, 2004.

IN WITENESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement
Addendum, on the 14th day of December 2000.

                                        MATRIX CAPITAL BANK

                                        By: /s/ D. Mark Spencer
                                        Name:  D. Mark Spencer

                                        Its:     Chairman

                                        By: /s/ Gary Lenzo
                                        Name:      Gary Lenzo
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2023

D.2 (+) Surface 

erosion, runoff, 

and sediment 

D.1 (+/-) Wildlife movement 

(species specific) 

(+) habitat fragmentation

C.2 (+) Local 

business and 

support 

infrastructure

C.1 (+/-) Income 

and income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.1 (+/-) 

Wildlife 

stress

C.3 (+/-) Health and safety 

of humans and animals

Initial setting: A forest stand where temporary, periodic 

equipment access is needed to carry out a management 

activity. Sites are on suited soils with appropriate bearing 

strength, drainage class, and slope. Sites avoid critical wildlife 

habitat and environmentally sensitive areas.

D.8 (+) 

Contractor 

income

2. Vehicular traffic to construct trails and 

landings and remove forest products

I.7 (+/-) Fire 

hazard

I.8 (-) Wildfire 

suppression 

activities and cost

D.4 (+) 

Airborne 

particulate 

matter

I.5 (+/-) Net 

return to 

landowner

Critical Area Planting (342)

Sediment Basin (350)

Access Control (472)

Structure for Water Control 

(587)

I.2 (+/-) Water 

quality 

Traffic safety mitigations 

in Access Road, (560). 

Caution signs, flaggers, 

etc. (local requirements)

D.3 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

I.3 (-) Soil 

quality

D.10 (-) Shade 

(+) sunlight 

I.12 (+) 

Recreational 

opportunities

I.11 (+/-) Wildlife 

populations and 

diversity (species 

specific)

Forest Trails and Landings (655)

1. Exposed roads, cuts, 

fills, landings, trails

ULEGEND

Start

I.6 (+) Recreation 

business and 

support 

infrastructure

D.5 (+) Soil 

compaction, 

displacement, 

rutting, ponding

D.7 (+) 

Recreational 

access

3. Breaks in canopy 

and understory 

vegetation

I.4 (-) Air quality 

(short term)

#. Created by 

practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Access Control (472)

Access 

Control 

(472)

Mulching (484)

Stream Crossing (578)

I.10 (+/-) Wildlife 

browse, invasive 

plants

C.4 (+/-) Ecosystem 

health 

D.6 (-) 

Productive 

forested 

area

D.9 (+) Increased 

vehicular traffic

I.9 (+) Safety hazard 

at junctions and on 

public roads

Road/Trail/Landing 

Closure and Treatment 

(654)
#### Perfection Furniture Company, Inc., Respondent, vs. Travelers Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Shaw, Muskat &' Paulsen*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *R. V. Baker, Jr.*of Kenosha, *Leonard Spira*of Chicago, Illinois, and *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on March 7, 1933.
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating
     Partnership  for the  quarterly  period ended June 30, 2005 (the  "Report")
     fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the Securities  Exchange  Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


 Dated:  August 5, 2005               /s/ Stanley K. Tanger
       --------------------           -----------------------------------
                                      Stanley K. Tanger
                                      Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust
                                      Sole General Partner of the Registrant
# C_2004251EN.01001501.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 July 2004

in Case T-311/02: Vitaly Lissotschenko and Joachim Hentze v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application to register the word mark LIMO - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 251/25)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-311/02: Vitaly Lissotschenko, residing in Dortmund (Germany), Joachim Hentze, residing in Werl (Germany), represented by B. Hein, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: J. Weberndörfer and G. Schneider) — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2002 (Case R 363/2000-2) concerning registration of the word mark LIMO as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 20 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305 of 7.12.2002.

1

---
# C_2005057EN.01001202.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 13 January 2005

in Case C-61/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2000/76/EC - Incineration of waste - Failure to transpose)

(2005/C 57/23)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-61/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Konstantinidis) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) – Action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 12 February 2004 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of Chamber, N. Colneric and E. Levits (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; and
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2007
    /s/ Bonnie L. HerronBonnie L. HerronChief Financial Officer
# C_2005115EN.01000601.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 3 March 2005

in Case C-472/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden): Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Arthur Andersen & Co. Accountants c.s. (1)

1

(Sixth VAT directive - Article 13B(a) - Exemption of services related to insurance transactions by insurance brokers and insurance agents - Life assurance - ‘Back office’ activities)

(2005/C 115/11)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-472/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands), made by decision of 7 November 2003, received at the Court on 12 November 2003, in the proceedings Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Arthur Andersen & Co. Accountants c.s. — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, K. Schiemann and E. Juhász, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General, M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 13B(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that 'back office' activities, consisting in rendering services, for payment, to an insurance company do not constitute the performance of services relating to insurance transactions carried out by an insurance broker or an insurance agent within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.01.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                      38,766,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,080,976
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,399,200)
<INVENTORY>                                 29,509,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            96,817,532
<PP&E>                                       9,290,314
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,740,501)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,219,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,816,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   103,624,195
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,272,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,219,775
<SALES>                                     48,747,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,747,114
<CGS>                                       34,051,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,051,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,084,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (352,653)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,963,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,910,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,052,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,052,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 22, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00839-CV 

WAURINE SPENCER AKA HELEN WAURINE SPENCER, VALERIE SPENCER, AND

ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants 

V. 

ECLIPTIC HOMES LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-02684-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated July 16, 

2019, we notified appellants the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellants to remit the filing 

fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellants that failure to do so would result in dismissal 

of the appeal. Also by postcard dated July 16, 2019, we notified appellants the docketing statement 

had not been filed in this case. We directed appellants to file the docketing statement within ten 

days. We cautioned appellants that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. To 

date, appellants have not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)(c). 

190839F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

WAURINE SPENCER AKA HELEN 

WAURINE SPENCER, VALERIE 

SPENCER, AND ALL OCCUPANTS, 

Appellants 

No. 05-19-00839-CV V. 

ECLIPTIC HOMES LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-02684-E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Whitehill and Molberg 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee ECLIPTIC HOMES LLC recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellants WAURINE SPENCER AKA HELEN WAURINE SPENCER, VALERIE 

SPENCER, AND ALL OCCUPANTS. 

Judgment entered August 22, 2019