alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of a Station Black-Out in a PWR Under Midloop Conditions Using RELAP5/MOD3.2 (NUREG/IA-0173)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0173 (PDF 1.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2000

**Prepared by:** S. Martorell, S. Carlos, G. Verdú, V. Serradell, J. Rodenas, R. Miró, C. Llopis*

*C.N. Vandellos II Travessera de les Corts, 55, Lateral 08028 Barcelona

Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Polytechnic University of Valencia Camino de Vera, 14 Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The present study consists of the simulation of a station black-out (SBO) transient, when the plant is in mid-loop conditions, using the thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD3.2.

This transient has been simulated on a typical three loop, Westinghouse design, pressurized water reactor (PWR) model working under mid-loop conditions.

The study was focused on obtaining the most important thermal-hydraulic variables in order to check the validity of the success criteria described in the plant probabilistic safety analysis (PSA), and also to analyze the code capability to simulate such conditions.

As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the main thermal-hydraulic plant features follow what it is foreseen in the plant PSA, although the values that are reached can not be completely taken as the correct ones due to the lack of experimental data to validate RELAP5 under these conditions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2005093EN.01002501.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/25

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 February 2005

in Case T-256/01 Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Selection procedure for the recruitment of temporary agents - Non-admission to the tests - Age limit - Principle of non-discrimination)

(2005/C 93/49)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-256/01: Norman Pyres, a former temporary agent of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the ‘Research’ Selection Committee's decisions COM/R/A/14/2000 of 1 December 2000, COM/R/A/07/2000 of 4 December 2000, and COM/R/A/10/2000 of 7 December 2000, not to admit the applicant to the selection procedures organised by the ‘Research’ Directorate General on the ground that he did not satisfy the condition relating to the age limit, — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Labucka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 17 of 19.1.2002.

1

---
#### Yehle, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Wiley, by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant.

For the appellant: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison, attorneys, and *Lawrence J. Brody*of La Crosse, guardian *ad litem.*

For the respondent: *Barton & Mogren*of St. Paul, Minnesota, and *A. P. Parsons*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Vermont - Fiscal Year 2024
#### Will of Morss: Morss, Appellant, vs. Pratt, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Albert W. Foster*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Bloodgood, Kemper & Passmore,*attorneys, and *Charles H. Galin*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALONZO GUTIERREZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1688

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 30, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

Alonzo Gutierrez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Martinez v. State, 211 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2017); Daniel v. 

State, 935 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2006). 

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2004239EN.01002203.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/22

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 12 May 2004

in Case T-198/01 R [III]: Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities

(Proceedings for interim measures - State aid - Obligation to recover aid - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests - Exceptional circumstances)

(2004/C 239/48)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-198/01 R [III]: Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH, established in Ilmenau (Germany), represented initially by G. Schohe and C. Arhold, and subsequently by C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci and V. Kreuschitz), supported by Schott Glas, established in Mainz (Germany), represented by U. Soltész, lawyer — application for extension of the suspension of operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/185/EC of 12 June 2001 on State aid implemented by Germany for Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (OJ 2002 L 62, p. 30) ordered in the present case by orders of the President of the Court of First Instance of 4 April 2002 and 1 August 2003 — the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 12 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/185/EC of 12 June 2001 on State aid implemented by Germany for Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH is suspended pending delivery of the judgment ruling on the main action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision 2002/185/EC of 12 June 2001 on State aid implemented by Germany for Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH is suspended pending delivery of the judgment ruling on the main action.

| 2. | The costs, including those of the intervener, are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs, including those of the intervener, are reserved.

---
# C_2005115EN.01001501.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/15

---

Action brought on 14 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-122/05)

(2005/C 115/27)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by U. Wölker and D. Recchia, members of the Commission's legal service.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/87/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/87/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of those provisions, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31(1) of that directive;

1

2

| 2. | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for complying with the directive expired on 31 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 275 of 25.10.2003, p. 32.

1

(2)  OJ L 257 of 10.10.1996, p. 26.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Gilla, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Georges Benarroch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Georges BenarrochGeorges BenarrochPresident & Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial Officer, and principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2005006EN.01002102.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 5 October 2004

in Case C-192/03 P: Alcon Inc. against the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Dr Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH (1)

1

(Appeal - Community mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Nullity of the Community mark - Article 51 of Regulation No 40/94 - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration - Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation No 40/94 - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 - Word mark ‘BSS’)

(2005/C 6/41)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-192/03P: Alcon Inc., formerly Alcon Universal Ltd, established in Hünenberg (Switzerland) (lawyers: C. Morcom, QC, and S. Clark), the other parties to the proceedings being the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: S. Laitinen and A. Sesma Merino) and Dr Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH, established in Olching (Germany) (lawyer: S. Schneller) – appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 2 May 2003 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, F. Macken and U. Lõhmus, Judges; Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro, Registrar: R. Grass, has given an order on 5 October 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Alcon Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Alcon Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158 of 5.7.2003.

1

---
# C_2005045EN.01002301.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/23

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 23 November 2004

in Case 376/02, O v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Article 78 of the Staff Regulations - Invalidity pension - Invalidity Committee - Membership - Occupational disease)

(2005/C 45/51)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-376/02: O, a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels, represented by J. Van Rossum and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall) – action for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 14 January 2002 awarding the applicant an invalidity pension set in accordance with the provisions of the third paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of 14 January 2002 awarding the applicant an invalidity pension. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of 14 January 2002 awarding the applicant an invalidity pension.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.03.

1

---
NO. SCPW-12-0000565

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT

COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(S.P.P. No. 12-1-0011)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.

and Circuit Judge Kim, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Michael Tierney's

Motion for Reconsideration filed on July 16, 2012, the papers in

support, and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 3, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Glenn J. Kim

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000565

03-AUG-2012

09:28 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2

CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. McAree, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

By:

/s/ PETER F. MCAREE Peter F. McAree Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
March 11, 2011

---



QuickLinks
New Mexico State Amendments to Part 75 (20.2.75 NMAC), Construction Permit Fees, submitted to EPA April 11, 2002. The April 11, 2002, cover letter for this submittal is inthis Regulations.gov docket (docket EPA-R06-OAR2005-NM-0006), document EPA-R06-OAR-2005-NM0006-0002. The documents submitted for the amendments to Part 75 are in Element 5 of the submittal, documents EPA-R06-OAR-2005-NM-0006-0014 to EPA-R06-OAR-2005-NM-0006-0018 in this docket.
1021-XXXX_2983-0714 

MGK® 2983

ACTIVE INGREDIENTS:  2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-(methoxymethyl)benzyl (EZ)- 

 (1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-3-(2-cyanoprop-1-enyl)-2,2- 

 Dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate........................... 2.225% 

* Piperonyl 

Butoxide.................................................................. 

17.800% 

 OTHER INGREDIENTS ........................................................................................... 79.975% 

 100.000% 

 * (butyl carbityl)(6-propylpiperonyl) ether and related compounds 

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN 

CAUTION

FIRST AID 

IF SWALLOWED:  Call a poison control center or doctor immediately for 

treatment advice. 

 Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by a poison 

control center or a doctor. 

 Have person sip a glass of water if able to swallow.  Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. 

IF ON SKIN OR CLOTHING: 

 Take off contaminated clothing.  Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 

minutes. 

 Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice. 

Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison control center or doctor, or going for treatment. For information regarding medical emergencies or pesticide incidents, call 1-888-740-8712. 

Net Weight __________ 

Manufactured by: 

8810 Tenth Avenue North 

Minneapolis, MN 55427 

EPA Reg. No. 1021-XXXX EPA Est. No. 1021-MN-2 

PRECAUTIONARY STAT

HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND DOM

CAUTIO

Harmful if swallowed. Wash thoroughly with soap and eating, drinking, chewing gum, using tobacco or using repeated skin contact may cause allergic reactions in 

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZ

This product is toxic to aquatic organisms, including fdischarge effluent containing this product into lakes, sor other waters unless in accordance with the requireDischarge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and thnotified in writing prior to discharge. Do not discharge sewer systems without previously notifying the local sFor guidance contact your State Water Board or Regcontaminate water when disposing of equipment was

DIRECTIONS FOR 

It is a violation of Federal Law to 

in a manner inconsistent with 

Only for formulation into an insecticide for 1) indoor residuses restricted to building surfaces and spot treatments This product must not be formulated into wettable powdepackaged in water soluble bags. Not for formulation into granular End Use Products. 

STORAGE AND DI

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage oPESTICIDE STORAGE: Store in a warm, dry place. 

PESTICIDE DISPOSAL: Wastes resulting from the u

of on site or at an approved waste disposal facility. In sand, earth or synthetic absorbents. Do not use alkawith alkaline detergents. CONTAINER HANDLING: Nonrefillable Container. 

Triple rinse (or equivalent) promptly after emptying areconditioning, if appropriate or dispose of in a sanitaapproved by State and Local authorities.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2204 Lower Tribunal No. 2 1

- CA

- 00 1111

_____________________________ M IKA C OATES and N UZHAT C OATES ,

Appellant s ,

v.
A NTHONY S POTO and S HARON S POTO ,

Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

.

Joseph C. Fuller , Judge

. January 30, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

.
TRAVER , C

. J. , and WHITE and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Christian W. Waugh , and Mary A. Norberg, of Waugh, PLLC , Orlando , for Appellant s

. Trisha L. Ryan , of Lusk, Drasites & Tolisano, P.A. , C ape Coral , for Appellee s

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
# C_2005135EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,05 % on 1 June 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 June 2005

(2005/C 135/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2228 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4404 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67545 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1400 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5310 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9170 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5751 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,405 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,09 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1622 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 199 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,185 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6718 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6347 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5183 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7511 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0491 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 236,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,4664 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1205 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 708,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,647 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,710 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,7280 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,864 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2228

JPY

Japanese yen

132,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4404

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67545

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1400

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5310

ISK

Iceland króna

79,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9170

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5751

CZK

Czech koruna

30,405

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,09

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1622

ROL

Romanian leu

36 199

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,185

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6718

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6347

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5183

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7511

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0491

KRW

South Korean won

1 236,01

ZAR

South African rand

8,4664

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1205

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 708,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,647

PHP

Philippine peso

66,710

RUB

Russian rouble

34,7280

THB

Thai baht

49,864

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005115EN.01004003.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/40

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-197/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 115/72)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 19 January 2005, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-197/03, Proras Srl Engineering and Contracting v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---