alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.14

                           CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT

                                    OF THE

                   SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PIK PREFERRED STOCK,
                     SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK,
                   SERIES D CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND
                     SERIES E CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                      OF

                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

   Pursuant to Section 243(b) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
                                    Delaware

     The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), HEREBY CERTIFIES as
follows:

     1.   All outstanding shares of the Series A Convertible PIK Preferred
Stock, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D Convertible Preferred
Stock and Series E Convertible Preferred Stock have been converted into shares
of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.

     2.   The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation prohibits the
reissuance of any shares of the Series A Convertible PIK Preferred Stock, Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and Series E
Convertible Preferred Stock and requires that all such shares shall be retired.

     3.   Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Section 243(b) of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, upon the filing of this
Certificate of Retirement, all of the shares of the Series A Convertible PIK
Preferred Stock, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock and Series E Convertible Preferred Stock shall be retired and
the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended so as to
eliminate all reference to the Series A Convertible PIK Preferred Stock, Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and Series E
Convertible Preferred Stock and then all such shares will assume the status of
authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Retirement to be executed and attested and its corporate seal to be affixed
hereto this 17/th/ day of August, 1999.


                         THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


                         By: /s/ Arthur J. Bacci
                             --------------------------------------------------
                                 Arthur J. Bacci
                                President
HomeRadioactive WasteStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

# Spent Fuel Storage Oversight

The NRC's safety oversight program for spent fuel storage is designed to prevent radiation-related deaths and illnesses, protect the environment, and safeguard the material from terrorist threats. The oversight program includes inspections and assessments of licensee and vendor activities with a focus on minimizing risk to public health and safety.

**How NRC Conducts its Oversight Program**

The NRC periodically inspects the design, fabrication, and use of dry cask storage systems by sending inspectors to licensee and cask vendor facilities. The inspectors examine whether licensees and vendors are performing activities in accordance with radiation safety requirements, licensing and certificate of compliance requirements, and quality assurance program commitments. Inspectors follow guidance in the NRC Inspection Manual which contains objectives and procedures to use for each type of inspection.

**Results**

The NRC issues reports to document inspection findings. These inspection reports may contain enforcement actions and follow-up inspection items. NRC makes the Inspection Reports available for public review through its electronic document retrieval system (ADAMS). You can locate spent fuel storage inspection reports by searching for documents with a cask designer's name or docket number, or an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation's site name or docket number.

**Enforcement**

As part of our oversight process, NRC issues sanctions called enforcement actions to licensees who violate our regulations. These sanctions, may include notices of violation, monetary fines, or orders to modify, suspend, or revoke a license or require specific actions because of a public health issue. See our Enforcement page for more information.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Spent Fuel Pools
          - Dry Cask Storage
          - Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF)
          - Regulations, Guidance, and Communications
          - Licensing
          - Oversight
          - Public Involvement

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020
#### George, Appellant, vs. North American Accident Insurance Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Edward M. Goemans*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Anderson, Donovan & Steinle*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02645]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2015-OS-0013]


Notice of Availability (NOA) of an Environmental Assessment (EA) 
Addressing Implementation of the Real Property Master Plan at Defense 
Distribution Depot, San Joaquin

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of an Environmental Assessment 
(EA) Addressing Implementation of the Real Property Master Plan at 
Defense Distribution Depot, San Joaquin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) announces the availability 
of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the potential environmental 
impacts associated with the Proposed Action to implement a Real 
Property Master Plan at Defense Distribution Depot, San Joaquin. The EA 
has been prepared as required under the National Environmental Policy 
Act (NEPA) (1969). In addition, the EA complies with DLA Regulation 
1000.22. DLA has determined that the Proposed Action would not have a 
significant impact on the human environment within the context of NEPA. 
Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not 
required.

DATES: Public comments will be accepted on or before March 12, 2015. 
Comments received by the end of the 30-day period will be considered 
when preparing the final version of the document. The EA is available 
electronically at http://www.dla.mil/InstallationSupport/Documents/DEASanJoaquinRPMP102914.pdf.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to one of the following:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, 2nd floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira Silverberg at 703-767-0705 during 
normal business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. (EST) or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfa6bdaee1bca6a3b9aabdadaabda88faba3aee1a2a6a3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d243f2c633e24213b283f2f283f2a0d29212c63202421">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 4, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015-02645 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Action brought on 17 August 2004 by Pascal Millot against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-347/04)

(2004/C 262/104)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 August 2004 by Pascal Millot, resident in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant argues that the contested decision infringes the second paragraph of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations and the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination, since it was taken without considering the option of allowing him additional seniority in his grade on account of his training and professional experience prior to his recruitment.

----
# C_2004239EN.01001402.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 July 2004

in Joined Cases T-107/01 and T-175/01: Société des mines de Sacilor — Lormines SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(ECSC Treaty - Steel - Abandonment of mining concessions - Charges imposed on mining undertakings by the French Republic - Complaint - No favourable response from the Commission - Action for failure to act - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Capacity to bring proceedings - Undertaking within the meaning of Article 80 CS)

(2004/C 239/29)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-107/01 and T-175/01: Société des mines de Sacilor — Lormines SA, established in Puteaux (France), represented initially by G. Marty and subsequently by R. Schmitt, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Rozet and L. Ström) — application for failure to act and, in the alternative, for annulment, concerning the Commission's refusal to uphold the applicant's complaint seeking a declaration that the French Republic had infringed the provisions of Articles 4(b) and (c) CS and 86 CS by reason of the imposition on the applicant of allegedly excessive charges in the context of procedures for the abandonment and renunciation of its mining concessions — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs, including those of the procedure for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs, including those of the procedure for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 227 of 11.8.2001.

1

---
# C_2004273EN.01003201.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/32

---

Action brought on 6 August 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against Silicon and Software Systems Limited

(Case T-326/04)

(2004/C 273/62)

Language of the case: English

An action against Silicon and Software Systems, Dublin (Ireland) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 6 August 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by A. Whelan, agent and Dr D.R. Phelan, Barrister with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | condemn the defendant to pay the Commission the sum of EUR 38 446.50, corresponding to EUR 29 194 as the principal sum due and EUR 9 252.50 as late-payment interest from 30 August 2000 until 16 August 2004 at a rate of 8 % per annum; |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the defendant to pay the Commission the sum of EUR 38 446.50, corresponding to EUR 29 194 as the principal sum due and EUR 9 252.50 as late-payment interest from 30 August 2000 until 16 August 2004 at a rate of 8 % per annum;

| — | condemn the defendant to pay the Commission 6.40 Euros per day by way of interest at a rate of 8 % per annum from 17 August 2004 until the date on which the debt is repaid in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the defendant to pay the Commission 6.40 Euros per day by way of interest at a rate of 8 % per annum from 17 August 2004 until the date on which the debt is repaid in full;

| — | condemn the defendant to pay the costs of the present action. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the defendant to pay the costs of the present action.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

On 28 March 1994, the Commission concluded with the defendant ESSI contract No 10043 with a view to work being carried out in respect of research and technological development in pursuance of the ESPRIT Programme. In accordance with the contract, the Commission made an advance payment in respect of its financial contribution to the defendant's account. Upon completion of the work, the defendant submitted its consolidated cost statement. The Commission refused to take into account those costs incurred before the commencement of the contract and modified the costs statement to that extent. The Commission states that the defendant never objected to this revised consolidated cost statement established by the Commission.

The Commission then requested the reimbursement of part of the advance that was in excess of the revised consolidated cost statement, namely EUR 29 194. The defendant refused to pay the outstanding balance and therefore breached, according to the Commission, the terms of the contract.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**










Chief
      Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operation of the Company.





**TIB
              FINANCIAL CORP.**Date:March
                13, 2006
            By:
            /s/ David
              P.
              JohnsonDavid
              P. JohnsonExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
      by
      TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NextPhase Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form




10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Hemingway, Chief
Financial Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







August
      19, 2008
            /s/ Thomas
      HemingwayThomas
      HemingwayChief
      Financial Officer andInterim
      Chief Executive Officer
# C_2004228EN.01003402.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/34

---

Removal from the register of Case C-257/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 228/71)

By order of 6 May 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-257/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Oberster Gerichtshof): Stuij en de Man B.V. v Republic of Austria.

---

(1)  OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Program project: Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing.                    

*Date:*                         February 17-19, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         7:00 p.m. to 11:00 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton Salt Lake City, 150 West 500 South, Salt Lake, UT 84101.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marie-Jose Belanger, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scentific                               ( print page 7485)                            Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5181, MSC, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *belangerm@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations  imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 4, 2015.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02594 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3646 — Mabsa/Belgian State/BIAC/JV)

(2005/C 38/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
# C_2004314EN.01001801.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-389/02, Sergio Sandini v Court of Justice of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Action for damages - Admissibility - Exposure to asbestos - Occupational disease - Damage)

(2004/C 314/45)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-389/02, Sergio Sandini, an official of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, residing in Ehlange (Luxembourg), represented by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé, lawyers, against Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for damages for the physical harm and the non-material, professional and financial loss allegedly suffered by the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

---