alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2020

2. Compost-handling equipment 

purchased/dedicated

I.7 (-) Pathogens to 

ground & surface water

Composting Facility (317) 

C.3 (+) Aquatic health for humans, 

domestic and wild animals

I.9 (+) On-farm usage

I.5 (-) Noxious 

algal growth I.8 (+) Meeting water 

quality standards

I.2 (+) Agribusiness

C.4 (+/-) Income stability 

(individuals and community)

D.1 (+) Infrastructure 

and operational costs

I.3 (-) Manureassociated odors

C.1 (+) 

Community 

acceptance of 

AFOs

C.2 (+) Stream fauna, 

(e.g., fish, invertebrates)

Roofs and Covers (367)

1. Structure/site dedicated to composting process

(loss of land or plant growth)

Initial setting: Established AFO 

produces waste with potential to produce

pollution and a beneficial soil amendment

produce a beneficial soil amendment

D.2 (+) Compost

Start

I.1 (+) Product 

marketed

I.4 (-) Nutrients and organics 

to ground and surface water

I.6 (+) Dissolved oxygen 

in surface waters

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Waste Storage Facility (313)

Nutrient Management (590)

Waste Recycling (633)
# C_2004314EN.01000701.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/7

---

Action brought on 27 October 2004 by Commission of the European Communities against Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-449/04)

(2004/C 314/12)

An action was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 October 2004 by Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with Council Directive 2001/51/EC of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions needed to comply with Council Directive 2001/51/EC of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas and main arguments

The period set for transposition of the directive into internal law expired on 11 February 2003.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 187 of 10.7.2001.

1

---
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0626

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JESSICA ELAINE HURT,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including July 21, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 15 2023

06/15/2023
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2096 

To amend the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 

to require the publication of certain demographic data regarding missing 

children, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2017 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. RICHMOND, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. BASS, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. MAXINE

WATERS of California, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Ms. JAYAPAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 

Act of 1974 to require the publication of certain demographic data regarding missing children, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Missing Children’s As5 sistance Amendment Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2096 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA REGARDING MISSING CHIL2 DREN TO BE PUBLISHED. 

3 Section 404(c) of the Juvenile Justice and Delin4 quency Prevention Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5773(c)) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(3) publish an analysis of the information de12 termined under paragraph (1) that includes— 

13 ‘‘(A) a disaggregation of such information 

14 by such demographic features as the Adminis15 trator determines appropriate, including— 

16 ‘‘(i) race; 

17 ‘‘(ii) ethnicity; 

18 ‘‘(iii) gender; 

19 ‘‘(iv) sexual orientation; and 

20 ‘‘(v) gender identity; and 

21 ‘‘(B) analyses of subgroups of missing chil22 dren that are identified by two or more demo23 graphic features by which a disaggregation was 

24 made under subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2004228EN.01003702.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/37

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 June 2004

in Case T-307/01: Jean-Paul François v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Disciplinary regime - Relegation in step - Caretaking contract of the Commission's buildings - Reasonable time-limit - Criminal proceeding - Action for damages)

(2004/C 228/82)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-307/01: Jean-Paul François, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at Wavre (Belgium), represented by A. Colson, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for, first, annulment of the Commission's decision of 5 April 2001 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary sanction of relegation in step and, secondly, damages to compensate for the material and non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; for the Registrar: I. Natsinas, Administrator, has given a judgment on 10 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission's decision of 5 April 2001 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary sanction of relegation in step; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission's decision of 5 April 2001 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary sanction of relegation in step;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the applicant damages of EUR 8 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by him; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the applicant damages of EUR 8 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by him;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 2.3.2002.

1

---
1

Memo to: EPA

- RTP Date: May 2 1 , 2013

From: LAN Associates, Inc. Subject: Felman Furnace 2 Manganese

The following table provides a summary of the manganese mass emission rates and particulate matter

(PM) mass emission rates measured at the outlet of the Furnace #2 baghouse at the Felman facility

ranging from July

, 2010, to March

, 2013:

Table 1

– Summary of Manganese Data from Furnace #2

T he average manganese percentage in the PM 1 from the most recent testing appears to be significantly

higher than that from the previous tests . This result appears to be largely due to the variance in the

particulate data ( i.e. , [Mn + ] 5x higher than prior average, but mass emissions rate only 2x higher).

Given the inherent variability in operating conditions, raw material mixes, test conditions, etc., the

average manganese mass emission rate from all recent testing should be used.

JG

3811

- 07

- M

- Felman Fu rnace 2 Manganese Summary

- 13052 1

1 Obtained by calculating the ratio of the manganese mass emission rate to the PM mass emission rate
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 247
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 115-342]

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2017

 Mr. Russell (for himself, Mr. Cummings, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

                            October 10, 2017

                   Additional sponsor: Mr. Farenthold

                            October 10, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES.

    Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or to the Inspector'' and all that follows through ``such 
disclosures'' and inserting ``the Inspector General of an agency, a 
supervisor in the employee's direct chain of command up to and 
including the head of the employing agency, the Director of National 
Intelligence, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, or 
to an employee designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for 
the purpose of receiving such disclosures''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 247

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 115-342]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 10, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2005019EN.01001001.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/10

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 1 October 2004

in Case C-379/03 P: Rafael Pérez Escolar v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Action for declaration of failure to act - Locus standi - Admissibility of the action)

(2005/C 19/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-379/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 10 September 2003, Rafael Pérez Escolar (Agent: F. Moreno Pardo), the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. L. Buendía Sierra) – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and J. Klucka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 1 October 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Pérez Escolar shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Pérez Escolar shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251 of 18.10.2003.

1

---
No. D-963.

#### In re Disbarment of Henderson.

It is ordered that Paul Gordon Henderson, of Baltimore, Md., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon Leliever, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Osprey Gold,
Corp;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2004

/s/ Gordon Leliever
------------------------------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2004280EN.01000101.xml

| 17.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 November 2004

(2004/C 280/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2971 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4321 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69955 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9625 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5238 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,28 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5777 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,395 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6797 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,432 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2586 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 600 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,48 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 890 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,678 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5504 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0837 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8482 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1406 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 414,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,84 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2971

JPY

Japanese yen

136,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4321

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69955

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9625

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5238

ISK

Iceland króna

87,28

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5777

CZK

Czech koruna

31,395

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6797

MTL

Maltese lira

0,432

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2586

ROL

Romanian leu

39 600

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,48

TRL

Turkish lira

1 890 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,678

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5504

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0837

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8482

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1406

KRW

South Korean won

1 414,36

ZAR

South African rand

7,84

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
August 2023

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Obstruction Removal (Code 500) 

Removal and disposal of buildings, structures, vegetation,

debris, or other materials. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to site conditions where obstruction

removal is required to improve water quality, or facilitate

other conservation practices. This practice is not intended

for removal of the following: 

• Obstructions from aquatic environments 

• Trees, stumps, or other vegetation from wooded areas 

• Underground tanks 

• Unidentifiable or hazardous materials such as solvents, petroleum oils, and asbestos 

Common Associated Practices 

For removal and disposal of trees, stumps, or other vegetation from wooded areas, refer to NRCS

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Land Clearing (Code 460). 

For removal and disposal of obstructions from aquatic environments, refer to NRCS CPSs Clearing

and Snagging (Code 326) or Aquatic Organism Passage (Code 396). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1994 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make improvements to the 

information technology system of the Veterans Benefits Administration 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make improvements to the information technology system of the Veterans Benefits Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vocational Education 

5 and Training Enhancements for Reintegration Assistance 

6 Now Act’’ or the ‘‘VETERAN Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1994 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OF 

2 THE VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION 

3 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS. 

5 (a) PROCESSING OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL ASSIST6 ANCE CLAIMS.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall, 

7 to the maximum extent possible, make such changes and 

8 improvements to the information technology system of the 

9 Veterans Benefits Administration of the Department of 

10 Veterans Affairs to ensure that— 

11 (1) to the maximum extent possible, all original 

12 and supplemental claims for educational assistance 

13 under chapter 33 of title 38, United States Code, 

14 are adjudicated electronically; and 

15 (2) rules-based processing is used to make deci16 sions with respect to such claims with little human 

17 intervention. 

18 (b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 180 

19 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec20 retary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a plan 

21 to implement the changes and improvements described in 

22 subsection (a). 

23 (c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

25 Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on the implemenVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:23 Apr 13, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1994.IH H1994

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1994 IH

1 tation of the changes and improvements described in sub2 section (a). 

3 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans 

5 Affairs $30,000,000 to carry out this section during fiscal 

6 years 2017 and 2018. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Madson, and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and Frances Piontek, administratrix, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Arthur B. Doe*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent Frances Piontek, administratrix: *Joseph A. Padway,*attorney, and *L. A. Tarrell*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.