alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004278EN.01002402.xml

| 13.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3562 — SPORTFIVE/HSG/JV)

(2004/C 278/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3562. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3562. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

p0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

142203 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142203 

 COA: 298566 

Kalamazoo CC: 2008-001981-FC 

JAMES FRANK LIENEMANN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control, Conservation Crop Rotation, Forage Harvest Management, Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management, Prescribed Grazing, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2029 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2029

 To require the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration to 
issue a final rule that approves the use of Clearview font for positive 
        contrast legends on guide signs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration to 
issue a final rule that approves the use of Clearview font for positive 
        contrast legends on guide signs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Innovative Guide signs for the 
Nation Act'' or the ``SIGN Act''.

SEC. 2. CLEARVIEW FONT PERMITTED FOR POSITIVE CONTRAST LEGENDS ON GUIDE 
              SIGNS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Highway 
Administration shall issue a final rule that approves the use of 
Clearview font on positive contrast legends on guide signs. Such rule 
shall also be reflected in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control 
Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD).
    (b) Other Fonts.--The rule issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall 
not require the use of such font but allows a jurisdiction to use the 
Clearview font or any other font approved by the Department of 
Transportation.
    (c) Memorandum.--Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and 
notwithstanding the notice on January 25, 2016, in the Federal Register 
terminating the Interim Approval (IA-5) of provisional use of an 
alternative lettering style for positive contrast legends on guide 
signs and the memorandum issued by the Federal Highway Administration, 
Office of Transportation Operations on January 28, 2016, regarding such 
termination, a jurisdiction may use Clearview font for such guide 
signs.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004282EN.01000202.xml

| 19.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3580 — CINVEN/CBR)

(2004/C 282/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3580. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3580. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
II 

Calendar No. 714 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1182 

To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing agreements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2015 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SCOTT, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and 

Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Reported by Mr. THUNE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of 

existing agreements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF APPLICATION OF JSA ATTRIBU4 TION RULE FOR EXISTING AGREEMENTS. 

5 In the case of a party to a joint sales agreement (as 

6 defined in Note 2(k) to section 73.3555 of title 47, Code 

7 of Federal Regulations) that is in effect on the effective 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1182 RS

1 date of the amendment to Note 2(k)(2) to such section 

2 made by the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and 

3 Report and Order adopted by the Commission on March 

4 31, 2014 (FCC 14–28), such party shall not be considered 

5 to be in violation of the ownership limitations of such sec6 tion by reason of the application of the rule in such Note 

7 2(k)(2) (as so amended) to the joint sales agreement. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 714 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1182 

A BILL 

To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in 

case of existing agreements. 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report: Related to the License Renewal of South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499, South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (NUREG-2223)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<CIK>          0001004539
<NAME>         AIRPLANES LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       23
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   235
<PP&E>                                           4,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              186
<BONDS>                                          3,558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   125
<CGS>                                                2
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       64
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (1)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (38)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (36)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (36)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
#### Kentucky Finance Corporation, Appellant, vs. Paramount Auto Exchange Corporation, Respondent.

*October 20, 1923.*

*Adverse examination'. Foreign corporations: Attendance of officer within state: Constitutional law.*

The requirement of sub. 7, sec. 4096, and sub. 2, sec. 4097, Stats., that an officer of a foreign corporation which has brought an action in the state may be required to submit to an adverse examination within the state, is invalid, as denying to the corporation the equal protection of the laws. *Kentucky Finance Corp. v. Paramount Auto Exch. Corp.*171 Wis. 586, reversed.

See *Same*Case, 262 U. S. 544, 43 Sup. Ct. 636.

Per Curiam.

This case, reported in 171 Wis. 586, 178 N. W. 9, having been decided by this court upon appeal from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee county which orders were by this court affirmed, and an appeal from such judgment having been taken to the supreme court of the United States and said court having reversed the judgment of this court as shown by its mandate now on file:

It is ordered and adjudged, in accordance with said mandate, that the former judgment of this court entered June 1, 1920, be and the same is hereby in all things vacated and set aside; and

It is further ordered that the orders of the circuit court appealed from be and the same are reversed, with costs; and the cause is remanded with directions to reinstate plaintiff’s complaint and cause of action, and for further proceedings according to law.
# CA2005138EN.01000201.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/2

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10002

(2005/C 138 A/02)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for Budget Execution in the Budget Directorate-General.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the 10 new Member States of the European Union (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia).

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html - http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm and following the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration. The closing date for registration is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 4.14

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                           OF HARTFORD LIFE CAPITAL V

         The undersigned, the trustees of Hartford Life Capital V, desiring to
form a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C.
Section 3801, et seq., hereby certify as follows:

         (a) The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust") is
"Hartford Life Capital V."

         (b) The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has
its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:

                     Wilmington Trust Company
                     Rodney Square North
                     1100 North Market Street
                     Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001
                     Attn: Corporate Trust Administration

         (c) This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the initial trustees
of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust.

                             WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                             as Trustee
                             By: /s/ Patricia A. Evans
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Name: Patricia A. Evans
                               Title:  Senior Financial Services Officer

                                /s/ David T. Foy
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Name: David T. Foy, as Trustee
#### STATE on the relation of SARAH TIDLINE v. WILLIS HICKERSON.

Depositions are admissible in evidence on the trial of an issue in Bas-ardy, as they are in other *civil*cases.

*(.Pate’s case,*Busb. 244; *State*v. *McIntosh,*64 N. 0. Rep. 607, cited and approved.)

Proceeding- in Bastardy, tried at Pall Term, 1874, of Wilkes Superior Court, before his Honor, Mitchell, *J.*

On the trial of an issue as to the paternity of the child, the defendant offered in evidence the deposition of a witness who was too sick to attend the Court. The reading of the deposition was objected to by the Solicitor, which objection was sustained by the Court.

There was a verdict against the defendant. Judgment and appeal.

*Scott*c§ *Caldwell,*for defendant.

*Attorney General*Hargrove, for the State.

*422Rodman, J.

"We are not informed by the record for what reason his Honor rejected the deposition offered in evidence by the defendant. It is said here it was because he considered the proceeding a criminal one, in which depositions are not admitted. That a proceeding in bastardy in a civil action is settled by the cases of *State*v. *Pate,*1 Busb. 244, and *State*v. *McIntosh,*64 N. C., 607. The deposition was admissible.

Pee CuRIAm. Judgment below reversed and *venire de novo.*Let this opinion be certified.
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-11492, File No. 333-36785, File No. 333-37420 and File No. 333­70951) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-08249, File No. 333-08251, File No. 333-30854, File No. 333-30926, File No. 333-55316, File No. 333-66903 and File No. 333-70947) of Wilhelmina International, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2010, which appears on page 23 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
  /s/ BURTON MCCUMBER & CORTEZ, L.L.P.
  Brownsville, Texas
 March 31, 2011
Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Form 10-KSB of
CN Bancorp, Inc. of our Report of Independent Auditors dated January 30, 2003,
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of CN Bancorp,
Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the CN Bancorp, Inc.
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                                 /s/Anderson Associates, LLP



March 18, 2003
Baltimore, Maryland
#### Woshatko, by guardian, Respondent, vs. Zaudke and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Leonard F. Schmitt*of Merrill.

For the respondent: *Vernon J. McHale*of Antigo.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
SERVED: JULY 3, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF HEATH TECNA, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0325 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

# RECEIVED JUL -7 2014 HEARING DOCKET

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013WP910206) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

MarkBartlett, 

### Respondent's Counsel Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP 1201 ThirdAvenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 TEL: 206-757-8298 FAX: 206-757-7298 J.M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration NorthwestMountainRegion (ANM-7) 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX:425-227-1007 

### ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0325 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Savings and Loan 
Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et 
seq.) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 
CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to 
become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets 
or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a 
savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and 
loan holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 6, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Lang, Senior Vice 
President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:
    1. Kearny MHC, and Kearny Financial Corp., to merge with Kearny 
Financial Corp., (a newly formed holding company), and thereby directly 
acquire Kearny Federal Savings Bank, both in Kearny, New Jersey.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 4, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-02597 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P