alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005019EN.01001705.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/17

---

Removal from the register of Case C-518/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 19/37)

(Language of the case: Swedish)

(Language of the case: Swedish)

By order of 8 September 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-518/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

1

---
# C_2005082EN.01000501.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Sixth Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-59/04 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/29/EC - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 82/09)

Language of the Case: French

In Case C-59/04, concerning an action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 11 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: K. Banks) against the French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and A. Bodard-Hermant), the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg-Barthelet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; Advocate General, A. Tizzano; Registrar, R. Grass, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

French Republic

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 5(1) and Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 5(1) and Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20.3.2004

1

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DMITRY KRUGLOV, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 23-2305 (UNA)

)

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP )

AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 

No. 2) and his pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court GRANTS the application, and for the 

reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the case without prejudice.

Kruglov’s first theory in this complaint fails because he has no cause of action. Plaintiff 

alleges he submitted to defendant an Application for Travel Document along with an application 

fee, a request to expedite the application, and a request to waive the biometrics fee. See Compl. at 

1; Pl. Aff. (ECF No. 1-1) at 1. He states defendant advised that it “already has his biometric data, 

so Plaintiff doesn’t have to go to biometric appointment, but if biometric fee was already paid, it 

will not be refunded.” Pl. Aff. at 1. By refusing to process his application without a biometric fee 

notwithstanding his waiver request, and by demanding a biometric fee when defendant already 

had his biometric data, plaintiff alleges, defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 1341. See Compl. at 2. 

Because there is no private right of action under the cited criminal statute, Plaintiff’s First 

Cause of Action must be dismissed. See Short v. Hook Sun Eu, No. 1:20-cv-02425, 2020 WL 
2 

5946070, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 6, 2020); Rodriguez v. Shulman, 844 F. Supp. 2d 1, 13 (D.D.C. 2012),; 

Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 458, 466 (D.D.C. 1994). 

Plaintiff’s second and third theories are far too vague. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which 

the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader 

is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

8(a). Plaintiff’s complaint does not meet that standard, because it, among other things, fails to 

explain what “policies, practices, and customs” or failures in supervision lead to his alleged 

mistreatment.

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: March 17, 2024 

CARL J. NICHOLS

United States District Judge
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, William H. Channell, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Channell CommercialCorporation;

 

2.                     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: March 18, 2005 | By:    | /s/ William H. Channell, Jr.          |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | William H. Channell, Jr.              |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2005126EN.01001801.xml

| 25.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/18

---

DECISION

DECISION

(2005/C 126/08)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities, laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004, and in particular to Article 30 of the Staff Regulations,

Having regard to the Bureau decision on appointment of the Appointing Authority, as last amended on 26 October 2004,

Having regard to Notice of Open Competition EUR/C/135,

Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee at its meeting of 13 April 2005,

DECIDES

Sole Article

The period of validity of the reserve list for Open Competition EUR/C/135 shall be extended until 31 December 2005.

Luxembourg, 10 May 2005

Julian PRIESTLEY

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 219 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 219

 To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to 
 provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the 
           corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To correct the Swan Lake hydroelectric project survey boundary and to 
 provide for the conveyance of the remaining tract of land within the 
           corrected survey boundary to the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project 
Boundary Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE SWAN LAKE HYDROELECTRIC 
              PROJECT BOUNDARY.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of 
Agriculture, shall--
            (1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract of Federal 
        land within the project boundary of the Swan Lake Hydroelectric 
        Project (FERC No. 2911) as generally depicted and labeled 
        ``Lost Creek'' on the map entitled ``Swan Lake Project 
        Boundary--Lot 2'' and dated February 1, 2016; and
            (2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the tract 
        described in paragraph (1) in accordance with--
                    (A) the survey authorized under paragraph (1);
                    (B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 
                (commonly known as the ``Alaska Statehood Act'') (48 
                U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85-508); and
                    (C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
                818).
                                 <all>
```
#### Trachte, Respondent, vs. Oestreich, Appellant.

For the appellant: *R. W. Lueck*of Watertown.

For the respondent: *Kading & Kading*of Watertown.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 15


               Letter re: unaudited interim financial information

                                   (attached)
                                        
                                      96
<PAGE>
 
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Provident Companies, Inc.



We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-47551) pertaining to the Provident Life and Accident Insurance
Company Moneymaker, A Long-Term 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan for the
registration of 500,000 shares of Common stock of Provident Companies, Inc., the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-88108) of Provident Life and Accident
Insurance Company Stock Option Plan of 1994 for the registration of 3,500,000
shares of Common stock of Provident Companies, Inc., and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62231) of Provident Life and Accident Insurance
Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 1995 for the registration of 1,000,000
shares of Common stock of Provident Companies, Inc., of our report dated
November 12, 1996 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements of Provident Companies, Inc. which is included in its Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.  All of the shares of Class B
Common stock of Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company of America were
exchanged for shares of Provident Companies, Inc. pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Share Exchange effective December 27, 1995.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part
of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



                                                  Ernst & Young LLP



Chattanooga, Tennessee
November 12, 1996

                                      97
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 115 

To increase oversight of small business assistance programs provided by 

the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To increase oversight of small business assistance programs 

provided by the Small Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Small 

5 Business Assistance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OVERSIGHT OF SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 115 IS

1 (1) the terms ‘‘Administration’’ and ‘‘Adminis2 trator’’ mean the Small Business Administration 

3 and the Administrator thereof, respectively; and 

4 (2) the term ‘‘small business concern’’ has the 

5 meaning given that term in section 3 of the Small 

6 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). 

7 (b) OVERSIGHT OF SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE

8 PROGRAMS.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall col10 lect information from each small business concern 

11 that receives assistance from the Administration, in12 cluding a loan, a loan guarantee, a grant, or coun13 seling services. 

14 (2) INFORMATION TO BE COLLECTED.—The in15 formation collected under paragraph (1) shall in16 clude— 

17 (A) the operational status of each small 

18 business concern, to be collected 6 months after 

19 and 1 year after the date on which the small 

20 business concern receives assistance from the 

21 Administration; 

22 (B) if a small business concern is no 

23 longer operational, the reason for the closure of 

24 the small business concern; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 115 IS

1 (C) the number of part-time employees and 

2 full-time employees that each small business 

3 concern employs, to be collected— 

4 (i) 6 months after the date on which 

5 the small business concern receives assist6 ance from the Administration, and every 6 

7 months thereafter, during the time the 

8 small business concern is receiving assist9 ance from the Administration; and 

10 (ii) 6 months after and 1 year after 

11 the date on which the small business con12 cern ceases to receive assistance from the 

13 Administration; and 

14 (D) if the Administration is unable to pro15 vide assistance to the small business concern, 

16 the number of referrals that the Administration 

17 makes to another assistance program within the 

18 Administration or to another Federal agency. 

19 (3) REPORT.—The Administration shall include 

20 the information collected under this subsection in 

21 the annual report required under section 10(a) of 

22 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 639(a)). 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect 1 

24 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2004314EN.01001802.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-390/02, Antonio Cagnato v Court of Justice of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Action for damages - Admissibility - Exposure to asbestos - Occupational disease - Damage)

(2004/C 314/46)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-390/02, Antonio Cagnato, an official of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, residing in Dippach-Gare (Luxembourg), represented by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé, lawyers, against Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for damages for the physical harm and the non-material, professional and financial loss allegedly suffered by the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

---
# CA2005033EN.01000101.xml

| 8.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 33/1

---

NOTICE OF VACANCIES

NOTICE OF VACANCIES

(2005/C 33 A/01)

The European Defence Agency intends to recruit:

| — | For the Planning and Policy Unit

  1 Senior Assistant (ref. EDA/A/2005/006) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the Planning and Policy Unit

For the Planning and Policy Unit

1 Senior Assistant (ref. EDA/A/2005/006)

| — | For the Capabilities Directorate

  1 Secretary/Office Clerk (ref. EDA/A/2005/028) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the Capabilities Directorate

For the Capabilities Directorate

1 Secretary/Office Clerk (ref. EDA/A/2005/028)

| — | For the Armaments Directorate

  1 Senior Officer for Armaments Policy (ref. EDA/A/2005/045)
  2 Senior Officers for Armaments Cooperation (ref. EDA/A/2005/048 and 049) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the Armaments Directorate

For the Armaments Directorate

1 Senior Officer for Armaments Policy (ref. EDA/A/2005/045)

2 Senior Officers for Armaments Cooperation (ref. EDA/A/2005/048 and 049)

| — | For the Industry and Market Directorate

  1 Senior Officer for Defence Industry (ref. EDA/A/2004/054)
  1 Senior Officer for Defence Market (ref. EDA/A/2004/057)
  1 Senior Officer (ref. EDA/A/2004/58) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the Industry and Market Directorate

For the Industry and Market Directorate

1 Senior Officer for Defence Industry (ref. EDA/A/2004/054)

1 Senior Officer for Defence Market (ref. EDA/A/2004/057)

1 Senior Officer (ref. EDA/A/2004/58)

| — | For the R&T Directorate

  4 Technical Project Officers (ref. EDA/A/2005/037, 038, 039 and 040) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the R&T Directorate

For the R&T Directorate

4 Technical Project Officers (ref. EDA/A/2005/037, 038, 039 and 040)

| — | For the Corporate Services Directorate

  2 Contracting Officers (ref. EDA/A/2005/064 and 065)
  1 Senior Clerk - Infrastructure Section (ref. EDA/A/2005/074) |
| --- | --- |

—

For the Corporate Services Directorate

For the Corporate Services Directorate

2 Contracting Officers (ref. EDA/A/2005/064 and 065)

1 Senior Clerk - Infrastructure Section (ref. EDA/A/2005/074)

Deadline: 25 February 2005, the postmark serving as proof.

25 February 2005

More information (available in English) and application forms may be obtained on the Council website at the following address: http://ue.eu.int (contacts/job offers).

---