alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


BioScrip, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-187336) on Form S-3, (No. 333‐201925) on Form S-4 and (Nos. 333‐198849, 333-107306, 333-107307, 333-123701, 333-123704, 333-150985, 333-165749, 333-176291, and 333-187679) on Form S-8 of BioScrip, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 2, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of BioScrip, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10‐K of BioScrip, Inc. and subsidiaries.





Our report dated March 2, 2015, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, expresses our opinion that BioScrip, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 because of the effect of the material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states material weaknesses related to the establishment of accounts receivable related reserves and the timely recognition of bad debt expense, significant and unusual transactions, and general information technology controls have been identified and included in management’s assessment.








/s/ KPMG LLP








Minneapolis, Minnesota


March 2, 2015
# C_2005006EN.01004502.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/45

---

Action brought on 5 November 2004 by Andrea Walderdorff against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-442/04)

(2005/C 6/89)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 5 November 2004, by Andrea Walderdorff, residing in Brussels, represented by L. Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Appointing Authority's decision adopted on 19 July 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint dated 26 February 2004, by which she challenged the decision refusing to promote her from Grade A5 to Grade A4, for the 2003 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Appointing Authority's decision adopted on 19 July 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint dated 26 February 2004, by which she challenged the decision refusing to promote her from Grade A5 to Grade A4, for the 2003 promotion procedure;

| — | If, and in so far as necessary, annul also the Appointing Authority's original decision in November 2003 refusing to promote the applicant from Grade A5 to Grade A4, for the 2003 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

If, and in so far as necessary, annul also the Appointing Authority's original decision in November 2003 refusing to promote the applicant from Grade A5 to Grade A4, for the 2003 promotion procedure;

| — | Order the Defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those in Case T-432/04.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41220

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEREMY ANTHONY EDEN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-320-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Jeremy Anthony Eden

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Eden has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41220 Document: 00511573494 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-41220

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41220 Document: 00511573494 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


THINK New Ideas, Inc.
New York, New York

      We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement of THINK New Ideas,  Inc. on Form S-8,  filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on July 17, 1997, of our report dated September 19, 1997 on
the consolidated  financial  statements of THINK New Ideas, Inc. included in its
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1997.

                                          BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
October 2, 1997
# C_2005133EN.01000101.xml

| 31.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 May 2005

(2005/C 133/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2472 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1768 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5447 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,56 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5763 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,477 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,01 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,144 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 195 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,134 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7134 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6386 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5679 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7025 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7512 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0720 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2824 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3225 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 830,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,739 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,866 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0610 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2472

JPY

Japanese yen

134,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68495

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1768

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5447

ISK

Iceland króna

80,56

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5763

CZK

Czech koruna

30,477

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,01

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,144

ROL

Romanian leu

36 195

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,134

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7134

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6386

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5679

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7025

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7512

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0720

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,38

ZAR

South African rand

8,2824

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3225

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 830,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,739

PHP

Philippine peso

67,866

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0610

THB

Thai baht

50,370

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 11, 2010 

d0303 

Order 

 

March 11, 2010 

139322 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139322 

 COA: 290369 

Wayne CC: 95-004183 

HORACE CRUMP, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is a successive motion that is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). We 

note, however, that the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the defendant’s application 

for leave to appeal for failure to file a transcript of jury instructions because the defendant 

waived his right to a jury trial and was tried before a circuit judge.
# C_2005018EN.01000101.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 January 2005

(2005/C 18/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2963 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4417 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69530 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0570 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5491 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 81,48 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1970 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5820 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,373 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4314 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0763 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 564 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7505 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6979 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5938 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1097 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8305 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1257 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 345,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8413 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2963

JPY

Japanese yen

134,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4417

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69530

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0570

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5491

ISK

Iceland króna

81,48

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1970

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5820

CZK

Czech koruna

30,373

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4314

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0763

ROL

Romanian leu

38 564

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,660

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7505

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6979

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5938

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1097

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8305

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1257

KRW

South Korean won

1 345,62

ZAR

South African rand

7,8413

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004273EN.01002603.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/26

---

Removal from the register of Case C-81/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 273/49)

By order of 28 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-81/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from thel' Oberster Gerichtshof): Wolfgang Rohringer en qualité de syndic faillite dans la procédure de liquidation des biens de la société Eurokeramik GmbH & Co. KG v Gemeinnützige Salzburger Wohnbaugesellschaft mbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002.

1

---
# C_2004300EN.01003502.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/35

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Cour de cassation de Belgique by decision of that court of 6 October 2004 in the case of Sébastien Victor Leroy against Ministère public

(Case C-435/04)

(2004/C 300/67)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Cour de cassation de Belgique (Belgium Court of Cassation) of 6 October 2004 received at the Court Registry on 14 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Sébastien Victor Leroy against Ministère public on the following question:

Do Articles 49 to 55 of the Treaty of 25 March 1957 establishing the European Community preclude a national law of a Member State which prohibits a person who resides and works in that State from using in that State a vehicle which belongs to a leasing company established in another Member State when that vehicle has not been registered in the former State, even if it has been in the latter?

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130647 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130647 COA: 258796 Wayne CC: 04-001318-01 MANSA CARVIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
# Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) (10/17) Standard Document(65.78 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) Overview(91.97 KB)

Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) CPPE(26.41 KB)

Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment (Ft.) (654) Network Effects Diagram(88.3 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, March 16, 2015, 08:00 a.m. to March 17, 2015, 06:00 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, Montgomery County Conference Center Facility, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 23, 2015, 80FRN3613.                

The meeting has been changed to a teleconference meeting. The date and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 5, 2015.

Carolyn Baum,

 Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02757 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERITRUCK
DISTRIBUTION CORP'S. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       639
<INVENTORY>                                      1,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,170
<PP&E>                                         129,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,870
<BONDS>                                        166,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,611)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,668
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,168)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005106EN.01004003.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/40

---

Action brought on 14 February 2005 by Jean Dehon against European Parliament

(Case T-95/05)

(2005/C 106/81)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance on 14 February 2005 by Jean Dehon, residing at Hagen (Luxembourg), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin M., Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Parliament of 29 April 2004 appointing another person as deputy head of the French translation division; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Parliament of 29 April 2004 appointing another person as deputy head of the French translation division;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant takes exception to the appointing authority's refusal to uphold his application for the post of deputy head of the French translation division. The candidate chosen was appointed following the publication of internal competition notice LA/113 (vacancy notice No 9192).

In support of his claims, he alleges infringement of Article 233 of the EC treaty, infringement of Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations, breach of the principle of the right to career development and failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons.

Specifically, he contends that:

| — | the contested appointment was made without any examination of the applicant's application; |
| --- | --- |

—

the contested appointment was made without any examination of the applicant's application;

| — | the order of priority for the various procedures for filling posts, as provided for in Article 29 of the Staff Regulations, was not observed; |
| --- | --- |

—

the order of priority for the various procedures for filling posts, as provided for in Article 29 of the Staff Regulations, was not observed;

| — | the absence of a decision regarding the applicant's application under the procedure for promotion/transfer is particularly serious since the procedure for filling the post in question had already been the subject of an annulling judgment in Case T-261/99 Dehon v Parliament. Compliance with that judgment involved restoring the situation to the position as it stood before the circumstances criticised by the Court came into being. |
| --- | --- |

—

the absence of a decision regarding the applicant's application under the procedure for promotion/transfer is particularly serious since the procedure for filling the post in question had already been the subject of an annulling judgment in Case T-261/99 Dehon v Parliament. Compliance with that judgment involved restoring the situation to the position as it stood before the circumstances criticised by the Court came into being.

Dehon

Parliament

---