alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1999 1st Quarter 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003638
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         361
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                   99
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5
<PP&E>                                         33,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          541
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,447
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,297
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2254 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2635 Napa Street in Vallejo, California, as the ‘‘Janet Capello Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, 

Ms. BASS, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. BERA, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mrs. TORRES, Mr. ROYCE of California, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. NUNES, Mr. AGUILAR, Ms. BROWNLEY of 

California, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, Mr. COOK, Mr. CORREA, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. ISSA, Mr. 

KHANNA, Mr. KNIGHT, Ms. LEE, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. PETERS, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

VARGAS, and Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2635 Napa Street in Vallejo, California, as 

the ‘‘Janet Capello Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2254 IH

1 SECTION 1. JANET CAPELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2635 Napa Street in Vallejo, 

4 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Janet 

5 Capello Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Janet Capello Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Colonel Clifton Hoskins and 

Hoskins s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2014

No. 04-13-00859-CV

Leonard K. HOSKINS,

Appellant

v.

Colonel Clifton HOSKINS and Hoskins Inc.,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-03136

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief in Excess of 7,500 Words is 

GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            KSW, INC.
                                             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                                                  NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


                                                NINE MONTHS        NINE MONTHS         THREE MONTHS       THREE MONTHS
                                                ENDED 9/30/99      ENDED 9/30/98       ENDED 9/30/99      ENDED 9/30/98
                                                -------------      -------------       -------------      -------------
<S>                                             <C>                <C>                 <C>                <C>
NET EARNINGS/(LOSS)                             $   667,000        $  (639,000)        $   574,000        $    17,000
                                                ===========        ===========         ===========        ===========

EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - PRIMARY
Weighted average shares outstanding
  during the period                               5,468,644          5,461,792           5,468,644          5,461,792
                                                  =========          =========           =========          =========

Earnings/(loss) per common share
primary                                         $       .12        ($      .12)        $       .10        $         0
                                                ===========        ===========         ===========        ===========

EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
Weighted average shares outstanding
  during the period                               5,468,644           5,461,792           5,468,644         5,461,792

Common and common stock equivalent
  shares using the treasury stock method                  0             238,667                   0            93,858
                                                  ---------           ---------           ----------        ----------

Total shares outstanding for purposes
  of calculating diluted earnings/(loss)          5,468,644          5,700,459            5,468,644          5,555,650
                                                  =========          =========            =========          =========

Earnings/(loss) per common and                  $       .12        ($      .11)         $       .10        $         0
  common equivalent share - diluted              ===========        ===========          ===========        ==========

</TABLE>
# C_2005094EN.01000401.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3760 — AXA Private Equity/Lariviere)

(2005/C 94/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


Subsidiaries of the registrant:
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

Name                                              Percentage of        Country and Date
----                                               Ownership           of Incorporation
                                                  -------------        ----------------
<S>                                               <C>                  <C> 
South China Brewing Company Limited                  100%              Hong Kong
                                                                       May 26, 1994
SCBC Distribution Company Limited                    100%              Hong Kong
                                                                       August 31, 1993
Celtic Brew LLC                                       60%              United States
                                                                       November 1, 1996
AmBrew USA, Inc. (formerly Atlantis Import Company)   95%              United States
                                                                       July 15, 1994
Cerveceria Rio Bravo, S.A. de C.V.                   100%              Mexico
                                                                       November 11, 1996
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OR
                    RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 14, 2005


                                             /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Richard W. Lucas
                                             Chief Financial Officer
AFS-11-122-E February 24, 2011

Exemption No. 8840B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26744

Mr. David L. Jones Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Dear Mr. Jones:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8840, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Decem ber 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Technical Educational Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under Air Agency Certificate U5ET092K) for an extension of Exemption No. 8840, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute.2



### Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8840, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.



### The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8840, as amended, to February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8840 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8840.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6248
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY S.O. BETTS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-22, CA-97-65-AM) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony S.O. Betts, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Betts , Nos. CR-92-22; CA-97-65-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 1997). We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
450044568410/07

Attu: Legal Dept

149 Penn Avenue Scranton,PA 1&503’CommonwealthofPennsylvania

Countyof I. f)i..I’Jt /i:v4JIWVO(ENO. 154648

41 V jAc,M’ C)FROM(NAMEANDADDRESSOFAGENCENCYTELEPHONENO,

Yvette N. Rouse 717—787—9495

Bureau of Air Quality

400 Market St.,, 12th Floor

.Härrisburg, PA 17105COMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYLVANIASTD—521REV.12-88TO(NAMEANDADDRESSOFNEWSPAPER) Scranton Times—Tribune PUBLICATIONSAUTHORJZATION AND INVOICE

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed byageiy) 44 /O33f•FEDERALID.NOJSOC,SEC.NO. 24—0717470HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUBUCATIONOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOITYPEOFAD

EEMPLOYPURCHASE []CONTRACT []SELL j E]CLASSIFiEDLEGALNOTICEIDATEORDERNO.PUBUSHADVER11SEMyIT(NO.OF11MES)MAXIMUMNO,OFLINES I October 15, 2009DATESOFINSERTIONSIGNAFORAGEN

October 14, 2009, Wednesday editionYou,asvendor,areauthorizedtopublishthisadvertisementinyournewspaper,subjecttothetermsofthisorder,asfollows:Advertisementtobepublishedinregularadvertisingcolumns,nopositionspecified;captionoftwolinesandsignaturetobeincapitalsandsubjectmatterandtitleofofficer.tobesetsolidintyperegularlyusedby_yournewspaperforpublic(legal)noticeadvertising;chargetobemadeattheratechargedtoandpaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisementtoberunintheeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanycontractawardedtoithereunder,saidvendorwillnotdiscriminateagainstanyemployeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,sex,religiouscreed,ancestry,ageornationaloriginandthattheCommonwealth,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuchdiscrimination,shallhavetherighttocancelsaidcontract.Returnthiscopyatonceifyouwillnotacceptthisadvertisementunderthetermssetforth.ProofofadvertisingintheformofatearsheetmustbeincludedonParts 1,2&3.Returnoriginalandtwo copies (signedbytheeditororpublisher)toAgencylistedabove.Part1mustbenotarized.Part4isyours.Commonwealthtobebilledonlyforactualnumberofprintedlinespublished.

PASTE TEARSHEET HERE-AF.Beforemetheubscrib&aNotaryPblicinandforsaidCoiinyperspnallycarn “‘nwhobeingdulyswort,othdep2seand’saythatheis‘/I‘‘ kthetp‘VI” f /L/)L.A t/1’_-ageneralrewspaperpublidhedat_________________________________________thattheadvertisement,ofwhichtearsheetisattachedhereto,waspublishedintheregularadvertisingcolumnsofsaidnewspaper,intheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inallrespectsasorderedandinvoicedabove;andthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedthereforataratehigherthanischargedanyordinarycommercialadvertiserforasimilaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceandsetinasimilarmanner,insaidnewspaper. WvNc1,sv7( ,Swornandsubscribedbeforemethis / 7”” t’ 4 L’ I IThisaffidavitmustbemadebytheOwner,Publisher,orthedesignatedagentoftheownerorpublisher. I- 1 ‘L- t‘/SIGNATUREOFAFFIANT1 1
#### Mattmiller, Respondent, vs. Antigo Union Oil Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Arthur H. Strochan*of Antigo.

For the respondent: *Gustav Winter*of Antigo.

*By the Cotirt.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B Subcommittee.                              ( print page 7621)    

*Date:*                         March 2-3, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, Montgomery County Conference Center Facility, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ellen S. Buczko, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Program,  Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 20892, 240-669-5028,                         *ebuczko1@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 4, 2015.

David Clary, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02754 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2005019EN.01002002.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 December 2004

in Case T-11/02: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Retirement - Monthly allowance under Article 50 of the Staff Regulations - Services taken into account in the calculation of the allowance - Employment prior to entry into the service of the Communities - Transfer of pension rights)

(2005/C 19/44)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-11/02: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas, established in Kraainem (Belgium), represented by K. Adamantopoulos and V. Akritidis, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities – action for annulment of the decision of the Commission fixing the duration of the monthly allowance which the applicant receives following his retirement in the interests of the service under Article 50 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities – the Court of First Instance composed of M. Jaeger (single Judge); I. Natsinas, administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action:

| 2. | Orders the parties to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68 of 16.3.2002.

1

---