alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM June 2022

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (457)

C.1 (+) Quality of 

life for individuals 

& community

Initial Setting: Where shafts, subsidence pits, or adits 

of underground mines are open or where prior 

closures can be modified to reduce hazards to 

humans, animals and to protect other resources. 

Start

Closed or otherwise protected mine shaft, subsidence pit or adit of underground mine.

D.3 (-) Subsidence 

potential around 

the mine area. 

I.5 (-) 

Emissions of 

hazardous 

gases

Conduct appropriate 

cultural resources 

investigation

C.3(+) Quality 

of receiving 

waters

D.5 (+) 

Protection of 

existing cultural 

resources

I.7 (+) Site 

Stability

I.1 (-) 

Landowner 

Liability

D.1 (+) 

Construction 

and O&M 

Costs. 

D.2 (-) Hazards to 

humans and 

animals

I.2 (+/-) 

Farm/ Ranch 

profitability 

I.3 (+) Access 

and/or habitat 

for bats and 

other wildlife

I.4 (-) Harm 

or death to 

livestock

D.4 (-) Potential for 

surface and groundwater 

contamination

I.6 (-) Erosion

I.8 (-) 

Contaminants, 

pathogens and 

sediments to 

groundwater

I.9 (-) Potential 

for toxic mine 

discharge to 

surface waters.

C.2 (+) 

Biodiversity

C.4 (+/-) 

Environmental 

Quality

Pathway

#, Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

Mitigating practice

Associated practice
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation Reservoir (Code 436) 

An irrigation reservoir is a constructed dam, pit, or tank

used to store water for irrigation. 

Practice Information 

Irrigation reservoirs are constructed in areas where

seasonal water supplies are insufficient or unreliable to

meet irrigation water requirements for part or all of the

irrigation season. Irrigation reservoirs provide a reliable

water supply that can improve water efficiency on irrigated

lands. Reservoirs are also designed to control available irrigation flows, provide storage for spills, and

tailwater recovery. Storing irrigation runoff can increase the retention time and breakdown of chemical

contaminants. 

Irrigation reservoir design should consider a suitable site location where foundation materials are

adequate and impacts of failures are addressed. A suitable site should also account for the location of

the available water supply such as streamflow, irrigation canals, drainage area, or a subsurface

source. Address any impacts to other water users such as changes in instream flows, aquifers,

sediment, erosion, contaminants, or water temperatures. Changes in these parameters especially

changes in water temperatures could impact aquatic and wildlife communities. These should be

considered and addressed. 

The irrigation reservoir will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice and beyond. 

Common Associated Practices 

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Irrigation Reservoir (Code 436) is commonly applied with

CPSs such as Pumping Plant (Code 533), Irrigation Pipeline (Code 430), Irrigation System,

Microirrigation (Code 441), Sprinkler System (Code 442), Irrigation System, Surface and Subsurface

(Code 443), Irrigation Water Management (Code 449), and Structure for Water Control (Code 587). 

For further information contact your local NRCS field office.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 District of Columbia - Fiscal Year 2024
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below herebyconstitutes and appoints Frank P. Russomanno, John L. Sullivan and Paul R. Zeller, and each ofthem, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in anyand all capacities, to sign the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Imation Corp., and any and allamendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents inconnection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform to allintents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming allthat said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or the substitutes for suchattorneys-in-fact and agents, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     **Name** **Title** **Date**     /s/ SCOTT J. ROBINSON  Corporate Controller and  February 6, 2008Scott J. Robinson Chief Accounting Officer    (Principal Accounting Officer)       /s/ MICHAEL S. FIELDS  Director  February 6, 2008Michael S. Fields         /s/ CHARLES A. HAGGERTY  Director  February 6, 2008Charles A. Haggerty         /s/ LINDA W. HART  Director  February 6, 2008Linda W. Hart         /s/ RONALD T. LEMAY  Director  February 6, 2008Ronald T. LeMay         /s/ RAYMOND LEUNG  Director  February 6, 2008Raymond Leung         /s/ MARK E. LUCAS  Director  February 6, 2008Mark E. Lucas         /s/ L. WHITE MATTHEWS, III  Director  February 6, 2008L. White Matthews, III         /s/ CHARLES REICH  Director  February 6, 2008Charles Reich         /s/ GLEN A. TAYLOR  Director  February 6, 2008Glen A. Taylor         /s/ DARYL J. WHITE  Director  February 6, 2008Daryl J. White
# C_2005093EN.01001501.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln by order of that court of 27 January 2005 in Herbert Schwarz and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz v Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach

(Case C-76/05)

(2005/C 93/27)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany) of 27 January 2005, received at the Court Registry on 16 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Herbert Schwarz and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz and Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach on the following question:

| | Is it contrary to Articles 8(a)/18 (freedom of movement), 48/39 (freedom of movement for workers), 52/43 (freedom of establishment) or 59/49 (freedom to provide services) of the EC Treaty to treat payments of school fees to certain German schools, but not payments of school fees to schools in the rest of the European Community area, as special expenditure leading to a reduction of income tax, pursuant to Paragraph 10(1)(9) of the Einkommensteuergesetz (Law on Income Tax) as applicable in 1998 and 1999? |
| --- | --- |

Is it contrary to Articles 8(a)/18 (freedom of movement), 48/39 (freedom of movement for workers), 52/43 (freedom of establishment) or 59/49 (freedom to provide services) of the EC Treaty to treat payments of school fees to certain German schools, but not payments of school fees to schools in the rest of the European Community area, as special expenditure leading to a reduction of income tax, pursuant to Paragraph 10(1)(9) of the Einkommensteuergesetz (Law on Income Tax) as applicable in 1998 and 1999?

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CLAUDE SLOAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Big Stone Gap

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cr
- 00004

- JPJ

- 1 )

Submitted : September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Claude Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Vir ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Claude Sloan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 ( c )( 1 )( A ) , as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Sloan’s
motion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020 ) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

v. Sloan , No. 2:18

- cr
- 00004

- JPJ ( W .D. Va. Mar. 6, 2020 ). ∗ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

∗ This ruling is limited to Sloan’s appeal of the district court’s March 6, 2020, order. Sloan’s subsequent appeal of the district court’s July 16, 2020, order remains pending.
#### Van Dusen, Appellant, vs. Roddis Lumber & Veneer Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *W. K. Parkinson*of Phillips.

For the respondent: *Fisher, Cashin ■& Reinholdt*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROYAL ESTATES OF COOPER CITY, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company, et al.,

Appellants,

v.

GRAY CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

a Florida corporation,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1084

[March 14, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michele Towbin-Singer, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

018433. 

Marlon J. Weiss of Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Coral Gables, for 

appellants.

Roger C. Brown of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13b-14(b) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES − OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Strayer Education, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the yearended December  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Robert S. Silberman,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Robert S.Silberman                            Robert S.SilbermanChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

February 27,2007

----
# C_2004262EN.01002402.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/24

---

Action brought on 6 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-382/04)

(2004/C 262/44)

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by A. Bordes, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2002/11/EC of 14 February 2002 amending Directive 68/193/EEC on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine and repealing Directive 74/649/EEC (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2002/11/EC of 14 February 2002 amending Directive 68/193/EEC on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine and repealing Directive 74/649/EEC (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| 2. | Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of the directive into national law expired on 23 February 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 53, of 23.2.2002, p. 20.

1

---
#### Rehder, Appellant, vs. Lape and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Irving I. Segall*of Cudahy, attorney, and *Wilbershide & Baumblatt*of Racine of counsel.

For the respondents : *Vilas H. Whaley*of Racine.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
#### Zielsdorf (Eugene), Respondent, vs. Buchholz and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Freeman,*attorneys, and *Kneeland A. Godfrey*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Bottum, Hudnall, Lecher, McNamara & Michael*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finacial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of American Craft Brewing International Limited
and its Subsidiaries as of October 31, 1996, and the consolidated statements of
operations for the years ended October 31, 1996, and 1994, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements (the
"Financial Statements").
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                                    <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      OCT-31-1996      OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                         NOV-01-1995      NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                           OCT-31-1996      OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                 5,780,672        102,248
<SECURITIES>                                   0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             75,081         22,236
<ALLOWANCES>                               1,500            556
<INVENTORY>                               35,508         22,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       6,016,226        147,241
<PP&E>                                   754,283        656,764
<DEPRECIATION>                            90,453         21,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,001,306        866,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    254,872        251,216
<BONDS>                                        0              0
<COMMON>                                  36,969            645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0              0
<PREFERRED>                                    0              0
<OTHER-SE>                             6,692,101        188,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           7,001,306        866,278
<SALES>                                  427,750         63,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         427,750         63,707
<CGS>                                    104,473         38,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            790,014        331,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             283          2,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       303,408         17,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (665,955)      (288,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (36,405)       (47,560)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (629,550)      (240,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0              0
<CHANGES>                                      0              0
<NET-INCOME>                            (629,550)      (240,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.28)<F1>     (0.12)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0              0
        

<FN>
<F1>Refer to Note 3 of the Notes to the Financial Statements for discussion of
total common shares used in EPS.




</TABLE>
----

Action brought on 22 July 2004 by Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Parras Rosa against Council of the European Union

(Case T-297/04)

(2004/C 251/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 July 2004 by Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Parras Rosa, residing in Jaen (Spain), represented by José Francisco Vázquez Medina, of the Jaen Bar.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical with those put forward in Case T-295/04.

----
----

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2004

in Case T-91/04 R: Alexander Just v Commission of the European Communities

(Proceedings for interim measures - Competition procedure - Suspension of enforcement - Admissibility)

(2004/C 239/53)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-91/04 R: Alexander Just, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Lebitsch, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: H. Krämer, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for the suspension of competition COM/A/2/02 to constitute a reserve of assistant administrators (A8) in the field of ‘Environment’, or alternatively for the suspension of the validity of the reserve list of candidates in that competition — the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 9 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:**

** **

•                    theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the periodended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                    theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  April 18, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Jacob Inbar                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Jacob Inbar,                          |
|                                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Lewis, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Besch, Appellant, and Lewis, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county dated December 11, 1926: Fred Beglinger, Judge.

Personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant *Besch,*appellant.

For the appellant: *Benton & Bosser,*attorneys, and *Roger R. Tuttrup,*of counsel, all of Appleton.

For the respondent *Ray Lewis: Barber & Keefe*of Oshkosh.

For the respondent *William Lewis: Weed & Hollister*of Oshkosh.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
#### Gross and others, Respondents, vs. Village of Merrimac and others, imp., Appellants.

*February 6*

March 7, *1933.*

*V. H. Cady*of Baraboo, for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Hill & Miller*of Baraboo, and oral argument by *James H. Hill.*

*683Wickhem, J.

The merits of this controversy have been fully briefed and argued, but in the state of the record are not before the court and cannot be considered.

The order complained of does not purport to be a temporary injunction but this must be held to be its effect. It was made before issue joined, upon an order to show cause why an injunction *pendente lite*should not issue, and the complaint of plaintiff and certain affidavits constitute the sole basis for the order. It cannot be supposed that the trial court intended finally to dispose of the merits of this controversy in such a fashion.

This being true, the “granting or refusing of an injunction *pendente lite*is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and ... its order will not be reversed unless an abuse of discretion is shown.” *Fassbender v. Peters,*179 Wis. 587, 191 N. W. 973; *Valley I. W. Mfg. Co. v. Goodrick,*103 Wis. 436, 78 N. W. 1096. There being no showing or even contention that the trial court abused its discretion in preserving the *status quo,*the order must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Philip
      McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
      Communications, Inc.




Date:
                February 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Philip M. McDermottName:
            Philip M.
                McDermottTitle:
            Chief Financial Officer