alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Phoenix International Ltd., Inc. and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-19121) pertaining to the Phoenix
International Ltd., Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan (March), the Phoenix
International Ltd., Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan (October), and the
Phoenix International Ltd., Inc. 1996 Director Stock Option Plan of our report
dated January 31, 1997 included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of
Phoenix International Ltd., Inc.


 
                                                        Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 21, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2


 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CN Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael T. Storm
--------------------
Michael T. Storm
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2005


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CN Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by CN Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■ ■

■

★ ●

●

★ ● ●

●

●
# C_2004314EN.01002801.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/28

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-105/02 (1)

(2004/C 314/63)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 21 October 2004, the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-105/02, Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  
  OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002.

1

---
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3636 — Petroliam/Sasol/Uhambo/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 20/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 1981 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 204

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 8

. 

### 0 $ 680.00 $0 $ 680.00 

### 89 $ 60,520.00

0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 60,520



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/ hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regul atory action”?

YES * NO

* Explana tion:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answ er.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

s0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137865 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137865 

 COA: 277919 

Macomb CC: 2007-000056-FC 

JOSEPH HENDRIX, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

cases of People v Borgne (Docket No. 134967) and People v Shafier (Docket No. 

135435) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases 

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that 

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Tate, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ MICHAEL TATEMichael Tate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 24, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2192 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2192

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the non-application 
     of certain State waiver provisions to Members of Congress and 
                          congressional staff.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF NON-APPLICATION OF CERTAIN STATE WAIVER 
              PROVISIONS TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND CONGRESSIONAL 
              STAFF.

    If the American Health Care Act is enacted, effective as if 
included in the enactment of such Act, section 2701(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(5)(A)(ii)), as added by 
subsection (a) of section 136 of the American Health Care Act (relating 
to permitting States to waive certain ACA requirements to encourage 
fair health insurance premiums), is amended by striking 
``1312(d)(3)(D),''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,





1)
            the
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





By
      /s/
      Arthur L. Smith


Arthur
      L.
      Smith


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer


October
      17, 2007
# Iowa Cover Crop Factsheets

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Iowa Cover Crop Factsheets 

The Iowa cover crop factsheets are a quick reference to aid in selection and identification of cover crop species. The factsheets provide information on cultural traits, planting, and performance ratings. 

###   Barley

Barley is a cool-season annual grass that is very good as an Iowa cover crop for reducing soil erosion and fighting compaction.

Barley Cover Crop Fact Sheet(5.99 MB)

###   Cereal Rye

Cereal rye is a cool-season grass that is a popular cover crop for its ability to establish in the fall, suppress weeds, reduce erosion and soil compaction.

Cereal Rye Cover Crop Fact Sheet(6.01 MB)

###   Oats

Oats are a cool-season annual grass and popular Iowa cover crop because they grow quickly, help reduce soil erosion, and provide quality livestock grazing in the fall.

Oats Cover Crop Fact Sheet(5.99 MB)

###   Triticale

Triticale is a deep-rooted winter hardy annual grass that resembles wheat and cereal rye. It provides excellent cover, lasting residue, and scavenges nitrogen.

Triticale Cover Crop Fact Sheet(6.14 MB)

###   Wheat

Wheat is a cool-season annual grass that is an effective cover crop for weed suppression, erosion control, and as a livestock grazing supplement.

Wheat Cover Crop Fact Sheet(6 MB)

*Factsheets were created in a collaboration between USDA-NRCS and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach (Mark Licht, Hillary Olson, Mila Pessotto, J.D. Hollingsworth). Jason Johnson with USDA-NRCS designed the factsheets.*
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0630

Docket Number

2011-SW-010-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 56-003, Revision 0, dated November 16, 2010

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffOffice of the Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress (NUREG-1415)

# Office of the Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress (NUREG-1415, Volume 32, No. 2)

## Contents

        - Publication Information
        - A Message from the Inspector General

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1415, Volume 32, No. 2 (PDF – 18.2 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** October 2018**Reporting Period:** April 1, 2018 – September 30, 2018

Office of the Inspector General U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## A Message from the Inspector General

I am pleased to present this Semiannual Report to Congress on the activities and accomplishments of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) from April 1, 2018, to September 30, 2018.

This year we mark the 40th anniversary of the Inspector General Act and the creation of the original 12 Offices of Inspector General. Our office was established in 1989 under the 1988 amendments to the act. Since that time we have been part of a community that has grown to include 73 statutory Inspectors General who collectively oversee the operations of nearly every aspect of the Federal government. Every 6 months we provide Congress with a report detailing our independent oversight of NRC and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) during the reporting period. In the years to come, we look forward to continuing our efforts to provide independent and effective oversight of NRC and DNFSB and working with the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency on important issues that cut across our government.

During this reporting period, we issued reports intended to strengthen NRC's management of its programs and operations, including the Agreement State Program and National Materials Program; the staffing of its Headquarters Operations Center; and its interactions with Federal recognized Native American Tribal governments. We also issued an audit of DNFSB's implementation of its governing legislation. OIG also opened 18 investigations, and completed 25 cases. Seven of the open cases were referred to the Department of Justice, and 34 allegations were referred to NRC management for action.

NRC OIG is committed to the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of NRC and DNFSB programs and operations, and our audits, investigations, and other activities highlighted in this report demonstrate our ongoing commitment. I would like to acknowledge our auditors, investigators, and support staff for their commitment to the mission of this office.

Finally, our success would not be possible without the collaborative efforts between OIG staff and NRC and DNFSB staff to address OIG findings and implement corrective actions in a timely manner. I thank them for their dedication, and I look forward to continued cooperation as we work together to ensure the integrity and efficiency of agency operations.

Hubert T. Bell Inspector General

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          2,195
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,263
<INVENTORY>                                   115,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              170,740 
<PP&E>                                        115,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                309,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         137,709
<BONDS>                                       160,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             105
<PREFERRED>                                    79,550
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (74,588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  309,213
<SALES>                                        48,174 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,174
<CGS>                                          23,515         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,912 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (63)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 ($0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        
 

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statements of
           Income included in the Company's Form 10-K for the period ended
           December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
           such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<CASH>                                             4,511
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     58,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       44,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 118,953
<PP&E>                                            31,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                     8,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   174,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             59,836
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              29
<OTHER-SE>                                       103,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     174,280
<SALES>                                          208,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 208,403
<CGS>                                            113,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    113,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  73,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   18,357
<INCOME-TAX>                                       7,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               11,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      11,107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      $0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      $0.96
        

</TABLE>
#### James Riden and others *v.*John D. Frion.

Craven.

Wherever the statute of limitations is a bar to the recovery of one of the parties, it operates against the whole, because the disability of one does not save the rights of the others. The statute protects the rights of those who are incompetent to protect themselves; but where some of the parties are competent, they ought to take care of the interests of all, by prosecuting a suit within time.

This was an action of detinue for negro slaves, Lucy •and her increase. Pleas, “ general issue and statute of iS limitations.” The case was, that Michael Hyman *Ci*bequeathed to his daughter, Eliza Ridcn, a negro girl *ie*named Lucy, daring her natural life, and after her death, *“*to her heirs forever.” Eliza Ridcn died, leaving three children, the Plaintiffs in this suit. Two of these children bad Le.cn of full age more than three years after Defendant got possession of the negroes, claiming and holding them adversely : the third child was under the age of twenty-four years, when this suit was commenced. The Jury found a verdict for the Plaintiffs, subject to the opinion of the Court upon the following points : 1st. Whether the will of Michael Hyman gave a life estate to Eliza Ridcn, in negro Lucy, with a remainder to her children, the present Plaintiffs j or an absolute estate therein, so that upon her death, it accrued to her husband who survived her ? 2d. Whether the disability of one of the Plaintiffs saved the rights of the Plaintiffs against the operation of the statute of limitations ?

Tatuor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of this Court:

It is not deemed necessary to decide the question of title arising upon the title, because the Court is clearly of opinion, that the law is against the Plaintiffs upon the sta*578tute of limitations. Wherever the statute of limitations is a bar to the recovery of one of the parties, in such action, it operates against the whole, because the disability of one does not save the right of the others. The statute protects the rights of those who are incompetent to protect themselves *;*but, where some of the parties are competent, they ought to take care of the interests of all, by prosecuting a suit within time. The words of the proviso relate only to the case where all the Plaintiffs are under disability : “ that if any persons or person,” &c. meaning where either a single Plaintiff or several Plaintiffs are under some of the incapacities provided for.

This is the construction which has uniformly been made, whenever the question has occurred.*

*

*7*Cranch 156. 4 Term Rep. 516. 2 Taunton 441.