alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004230EN.01000201.xml

| 15.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 September 2004

(2004/C 230/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2237 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1003 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5439 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,69 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,363 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5773 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,525 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6614 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4278 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3775 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 035 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,96 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,985 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 839 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,749 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5926 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5421 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8538 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0706 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9955 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2237

JPY

Japanese yen

134,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68135

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1003

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5439

ISK

Iceland króna

87,69

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,363

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5773

CZK

Czech koruna

31,525

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6614

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4278

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3775

ROL

Romanian leu

41 035

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,96

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,985

TRL

Turkish lira

1 839 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,749

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5926

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5421

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8538

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0706

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,38

ZAR

South African rand

7,9955

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# TRACE5 Assessment of 100% Direct Vessel Injection Line Break in ATLAS Facility (NUREG/IA-0425)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0425 (PDF - 6.34 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2013**Date Published:** March 2013

**Prepared by:**Byung-Gil Huh, Dong-Gu Kang, Chae-Yong Yang, Seung Hoon AhnKorea Institute of Nuclear SafetyDaejeon, Korea

Ki-Yong ChoiKorea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeon, Korea

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:**Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The calculations using TRACE V5.0 patch2 code were conducted for 100% DVI line break test of ATLAS which is the first domestic standard problem (DSP-01). In the steady state conditions, the errors between the calculated and measured values are acceptable for most primary/secondary system parameters. From the transient calculations, the predicted sequence of events occurred some seconds later than that of experiment due to slow depressurization of the primary side after break. Before the LSC, the code could not predict well the behavior of downcomer and core collapsed water levels due to the under-prediction of the discharged mass and high flow rate returned to core from hot leg. After the LSC, the downcomer and core collapsed water levels drop rapidly and the code predicts relatively well the trend of downcomer and core water level. All RCPs suction legs or loop seals are cleared completely and suddenly. The predicted cladding temperature generally agrees well with the experiment except the peaking behavior. In the sensitivity studies, if the discharging mass increases arbitrarily, the downcomer and core water level before SIP injection shows better prediction result than that of base case. However, except for this, the overall behavior for main parameters shows the bad prediction results. For the effect of flow restriction from hot leg using the CCFL model, the predicted core water level was not significantly decreased compared to the base case. In conclusions, TRACE code has good capabilities to simulate the 100% DVI line break test of ATLAS. However, TRACE code including the choked flow and CCFL models needs to be improved and more detailed modeling is needed to predict more accurate results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2004255EN.01000101.xml

| 15.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 October 2004

(2004/C 255/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2377 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4376 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6876 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0916 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5449 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1955 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,576 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,445 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6658 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4289 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,295 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 244 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,92 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,025 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 844 400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6987 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5534 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6433 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8209 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0814 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1289 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2377

JPY

Japanese yen

135,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4376

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6876

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0916

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5449

ISK

Iceland króna

87,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1955

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,576

CZK

Czech koruna

31,445

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6658

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4289

PLN

Polish zloty

4,295

ROL

Romanian leu

41 244

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,92

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,025

TRL

Turkish lira

1 844 400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6987

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5534

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6433

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8209

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0814

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,67

ZAR

South African rand

8,1289

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Drainage Water Management, Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Surface Drainage, Field Ditch, Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​events/​.*                     This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292-8687.                

Dated: February 4, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-02577 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Participants of the Accenture Ltd 2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Accenture Ltd:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of operations and changes in plan
equity presents fairly, in all material respects, the changes in the financial
status of Accenture Ltd 2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan (the Plan) for the
period since June 5, 2001 (inception) through August 31, 2001 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
This financial statement is the responsibility of the Plans management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on
our audit. We conducted our audit of this statement in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
November 27, 2001
Chicago, Illinois
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:

Joseph J. BouffardTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2006By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and ControllerFebruary 14, 2006




24
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-58629 and 333-70405 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-12243
and 333-12633 on Form S-8 of The North Face, Inc. of our report dated February
6, 1998 (May 6, 1999 as to Notes 15 and 16) (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement
described in Note 16) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The
North Face, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
May 6, 1999
# C_2004300EN.01004002.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/40

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 September 2004

in Case T-291/02 González y Díez SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(ECSC - State aid - Action for annulment - Action devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate - Settlement of costs)

(2004/C 300/79)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-291/02: González y Díez SA, established in Villabona-Llanera (Spain), represented initially by J. Folguera Crespo, A. Martínez Sánchez and J.C. Engra Moreno, lawyers, then by J. Folguera Crespo and A. Martínez Sánchez, lawyers, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz and J.L. Buendía Sierra) — action for annulment of Articles 1, 2 and 5 of Commission Decision 2002/827/ECSC of 2 July 2002 on the granting by Spain of aid to the undertaking González y Díez SA in 1998, 2000 and 2001 (OJ 2002 L 296, p. 80) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of J. Pirrung, President of the Chamber, A.W.H. Meij, N.J. Forwood, I. Pelikánová and S.S. Papasavvas, Judges; Registrar: H. Jung, has given a judgment on 2 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 55254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21975]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2013-6005]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-34 Application for Short-Term Letter of Credit 
Export Credit Insurance Policy.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 
635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for Ex-Im Bank 
assistance.
    The Application for Short Term Letter of Credit Export Credit 
Insurance Policy is used to determine the eligibility of the applicant 
and the transaction for Export Import Bank assistance under its 
insurance program. Export Import Bank customers are able to submit this 
form on paper or electronically.
    The application tool can be reviewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-34.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 12, 2013 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export-Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-34 Application for Short-Term Letter 
of Credit Export Credit Insurance Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-0009.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by a financial institution (or 
broker acting on its behalf) to obtain approval for coverage of a 
short-term letter of credit. The information allows the Ex-Im Bank 
staff to make a determination of the eligibility of the applicant and 
transaction for Ex-Im Bank assistance under its programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 11.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hr.
    Annual Burden Hours: 11.
    Frequency of Reporting of Use: On occasion.
    Government Reviewing Time per Year: 11 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $468.
    (time*wages)
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $598.

Kalesha Malloy,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-21975 Filed 9-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

25 September 2014 

""ITYP•21MW4WHANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY 

YerAfrAt _i 

,See 

DEVELOP NRO LONG RANGE STRATEGY 

i CREATE A PROCESS THAT WILL LEAD TO AN 

NRO STRATEGY 

WHAT DRIVES CHANGES IN NRP? 

GO? (UTILITY ANALYSIS: INTELL INPUT & 

INPUTS, OTHER) 

..4.0.•*. ‘-r--&, 

WHERE DO THREAT/TARGET CHANGES FORCE US TO 

ASSESSMENT) 

WHERE WILL TECHNOLOGY PERMIT US TO GO? (P.O. 

- . . • , \ 

41 6" secc4e/r,-;,/ 

zz: AeirvEP 

WHERE SHOULD THE NRO BE IN 2000? HOW DO WE MINIMIZE LOSS/MAXIMIZE GAIN? 

WHAT IS THE DESIREABLE MIX IMPROVED 

SYSTEMS AND NEW CAPABILITIES? (P.O.'S) 

NEW SENSORS? 

SPECIALS APPLICATIONS? 

SURVIVABILILTY? 

WHAT ARE THE CONSTRAINTS? 

maile lleilreftedigesgfirft,. 

LAUNCH ALTERNATIVE FUTURES . 1,, 

.A4, 4 i°44€ -,(4,.....f.••,4 ".-w(sd 

1 

WHAT HIGH PAYOFF DIRECTIONS SHOULD WE BE 

POINTING TOWARD? 

R & D DIRECTIONS 

ARCHITECTURES/INTEGRATION 

WHAT STUDIES/EVALUATIONS ARE NEEDED? 

WHAT IS THE NRO LONG RANGE STRATEGY? WHAT ARE THE NRO STRATEGIC GOALS? 

PRIORITY OBJECTIVES (MAKE HAPPEN) 

ALTERNATIVE GOALS 

WHAT DECISIONS/FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED? 

WHAT IS THE STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS 

THAT WILL GET US THERE? 

-1",e'Po•BiliaBiPAIANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY 
EVOLUTION OF THREAT NATIONAL. POLICY 

TECHNOLOGY 

INVESTMENT PLAN 

R&D 

SYSTEMS 

ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH 

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE 

GOALS 

INFRASTRUCTURE 

BUDGETARY FACTORS 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

25 September 2014 

COMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

25 September 2014 

ivr oz....A.QA741ANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS 0 

FACTORS FOR LONG-RANGE PLANNING 

SOVIET APPLICATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY OR OPERATIONAL TCTICS 

- REDUCES EFFECTIVENESS OF CURRENT SYSTEMS 

ACCELERATING NEED FOR CONTINUOUS ENHANCEMENTS 

- DEMANDS TOTALLY NEW APPROACHES 

US TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES OPEN NEW DOORS 

- ENHANCEMENTS TO CURRENT SYSTEMS CAPABILITY 

- TOTALLY NEW MISSION CAPABILITIES 

0•41010P■INNIREIPOHANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY 

LY 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

25 September 2014 

"TIOT ODCkWHANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY 

PURPOSE OF LONG RANGE STRATEGY 

PLAN FOR ENHANCEMENTS TO NRP 

- EVOLULTION OF CURRENT SYSTEMS 

- DEVELOPMENT OF NEW MISSION CAPABILITY 

FOCUS R&D PROGRAM TO MEET PLANS FOR ENHANCEMENTS 

ASSIGN ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES TO ACCOMPLISH OBJECTIVES 

u■11012■01■Wilirgliy(HANDLE VIA BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY
Kansas Department of Health and Environment Notice of Public Hearing
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) proposes to incorporate Contingency Measure Compliance Plan s in to the ir 2008 Lead NAAQS State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision wi th Attainment Demonstration for Exide Technologies ’ nonattainment area located 413 E. Berg Road, Salina, Kansas . The referenced 2008 Lead NAAQS SIP Revision was published previously in the Kansas Register on July 31 , 2014. The inclusion of the proposed

c ontingency measures will satisfy requirements of Section XI of KDHE’s Air Emission Source Construction Permit (Source ID No. 1690035) issued on August 18, 2014. The plans ’ propose d
conti ngency measures to reduce Exide’s lead emissions include bag house re placement, increasing stack heights, interior fugitive dust capture, and roadway paving. This SIP revision update fulfills Federal Clean Air Act provisions requiring states with a designated nonattainment area to submit an attainment demonstration plan to EPA by December 2016. The proposed compliance plan does not include any rulemaking action. Any member of the public may request a public hearing or submit comments regarding this proposed action. If requested, a public hearing will be held on Tuesday , December 23, 2014 at
1:00 PM in the KDHE Bureau of Air (BOA), Sunflower Conference Room, Third Floor, 1000 SW Jackson, Topeka, Kansas

. If no req uest for hearing is received by Friday, December 19,
2014 at 5:00 PM , the tentatively scheduled hearing will b e cancelled and announced the following Monday on the KDHE BOA website at: http://www.kdheks.gov/bar/planning/pnplanning.html

. Inquiries may be made by phone to (785)
291

- 3278 or e

- mail ed to pgibbs@kdheks.gov

.The Contingency Measures Compliance Plan s are available for public review in the KDHE

BOA , Topeka, Kansas by contacting Pat Gibbs at (785) 291

- 3278. This proposed documentation
can also be rev iewed at the KDHE North Central District Office, 2501 Market Place, Suite D, Salina, KS by contacting Stan Marshall at (78 5) 827

- 9639 , or by accessing th e KDHE BOA
website , as cited above.
Comments from the interested public may be mailed to KDHE , BOA , Att ention: Pat Gibbs ( contact information noted above ) and must be received by the Bureau of Air no later than Tuesday , December 2 3 , 2014 , by 5:00 PM

. Any individual with a disability may request accommodations in order to participate in the public hearing a nd may request the propos ed plan in accessible format. R equests for
accommodation must be sent to Pat Gibbs by Monday, December 15 , 2014. Robert Moser, M.D. Secretary of Health and Environment