alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005093EN.01000101.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 22 February 2005

in Case C-141/02 P: Commission of the European Communities v T-Mobile Austria GmbH (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 90(3) of the EC Treaty (now Article 86(3) EC) - Amount of the fees imposed by the Republic of Austria on operators of GSM networks - Partial rejection of the complaint - Admissibility)

(2005/C 93/01)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-141/02 P, appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 15 April 2002, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: W. Mölls and K. Wiedner) supported by: French Republic, (Agents: G. de Bergues and F. Million) the other parties to the proceedings being: T-Mobile Austria GmbH, formerly max-mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH, established in Vienna (Austria) (avocats: A. Reidlinger, M. Esser-Wellié and T. Lübbig), Kingdom of the Netherlands (H.G. Sevenster) – the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President of the Chamber, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, J. Klučka and U. Lõhmus, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 22 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of 30 January 2002 of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-54/99 max.mobil v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of 30 January 2002 of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-54/99 max.mobil v Commission;

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by max.mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by max.mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;

| 3. | Orders T-Mobile Austria GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders T-Mobile Austria GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 169 of 13.07.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 10.10

 

(Translated from German)

 

Bruker Advanced Supercon GmbH

 

Ehrichstraße 10, 63450 Hanau

 

Bonus stipulation for 2009 and 2010 for the Managing Director Dr. Detlef Krischel.

 

With effect from the commencement of the Managing Director Agreement the bonus for Dr. Detlef Krischel shall be stipulated as follows (sec. 5 para 2 of the Managing Director Agreement):

 

1.                                       Dr. Krischel shall receive a bonus amounting to EUR 26,000.00 (EUR twenty six thousand) gross from the company’s turnover being achieved during the respective business year based on the consultancy agreement of the Company with Accel Instruments GmbH.

 

2.                                       For the business year 2009 Dr. Krischel is entitled to a bonus pro rata for the business days of the business year from signature of the Managing Director Agreement, i.e. start of the activity as Managing Director.

 

3.                                       Dr. Krischel is entitled to the full bonus even if the turnover of the company based on the consultancy agreement in case of a continued existence of the consultancy agreement does not achieve the full amount of the bonus of Dr. Krischel.

 

4.                                       If the consultancy agreement is not achieved or if it should be effectively terminated by Accel Instruments GmbH or become ineffective before expiration of the year 2010 due to any reason except closing down or insolvency,

 

4.1                                 Dr. Krischel is entitled to a bonus pro rata for the business year of termination according to business days until date of termination. In case of closing down or insolvency of Accel Instruments GmbH Dr. Krischel shall receive the full bonus payment.

 

4.2                                 the company and Dr. Krischel shall newly stipulate the basis for a bonus stipulation. Thereby, the objective criterion for the total bonus for 2009 and 2010 remains unchanged.

 

5.                                       The bonus shall become due after stipulation of the Company’s annual financial statement by the general meeting of shareholders. During the calendar year a partial payment can be effected in the third quarter amounting to half of the prospective annual bonus. Should the actual bonus be lower than the effected partial payment the difference shall either be refunded or settled.

 

6.                                       This bonus stipulation is valid for the business years 2009 and 2010.

 











 

Hanau, April 2009

 

 

	
/s/ Burkhard Prause
    	
 
    
	
Dr. Burkhard Prause
    	
 
    
	
Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    
	
of the shareholder Bruker Advanced Supercon Inc.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2097 

To prevent the reclassification of certain ammunition as armor piercing 

ammunition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2017 

Mr. PERRY (for himself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prevent the reclassification of certain ammunition as 

armor piercing ammunition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ATF Wrongful Reclas5 sification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN 

7 AMMUNITION AS ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNI8 TION. 

9 Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code, 

10 is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2097 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘may be 

2 used’’ and inserting ‘‘is designed and intended by 

3 the manufacturer solely for use’’; and 

4 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘the Attorney General 

6 finds is primarily intended’’ and inserting ‘‘is 

7 primarily intended by the manufacturer’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘sporting’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘lawful’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United States Code, to require 

the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. SOTO, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, 

Ms. MENG, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mrs. TORRES, Mr. VELA, 

Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Ms. JACKSON LEE, 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. 

PLASKETT, Mr. MOULTON, and Mr. HIMES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 

Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United 

States Code, to require the provision of chiropractic care 

and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans 

Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2251 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Care 

3 Available to All Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC 

5 CARE AND SERVICES TO VETERANS. 

6 Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

7 Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 

8 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The program’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(2) The program shall be carried out at not 

14 fewer than 75 medical centers by not later than De15 cember 31, 2014, and at all medical centers by not 

16 later than December 31, 2018.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. EXPANDED CHIROPRACTOR SERVICES AVAILABLE 

18 TO VETERANS. 

19 (a) MEDICAL SERVICES.—Paragraph (6) of section 

20 1701 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by add21 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

22 ‘‘(H) Chiropractic services.’’. 

23 (b) REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.—Paragraph (8) of 

24 such section is amended by inserting ‘‘chiropractic,’’ after 

25 ‘‘counseling,’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2251 IH

1 (c) PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES.—Paragraph 

2 (9) of such section is amended— 

3 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) 

4 through (K) as subparagraphs (G) through (L), re5 spectively; and 

6 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol7 lowing new subparagraph (F): 

8 ‘‘(F) periodic and preventative chiropractic 

9 examinations and services;’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR BILLING INFORMATION CONCEPTS CORP. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          41,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                       138
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,734
<PP&E>                                          24,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,164
<BONDS>                                          2,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              162
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,012
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,836
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Oregon - Fiscal Year 2024
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13b-14(b) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Strayer Education, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the yearended December  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Mark C. Brown, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Mark C.Brown               Mark C. BrownSeniorVice President andChief FinancialOfficer

February 27,2007

----
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00421-CV

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Aaron WEED and Vicky Weed, Individually and as Next Friends of Kaitlyn Weed, a Minor,

Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-01932

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2011

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Their motion states that 

appellees have agreed to nonsuit with prejudice all claims against appellant. The parties have 

moved this court to tax costs against the party that incurred them and dismiss the appeal. The 

joint motion is granted and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). In
04-11-00421-CV

- 2 -

accordance with the agreement, costs of this appeal are taxed against the party that incurred 

them. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
President, Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC

P.O. Box 95592

2542 Singletree Lane

South Jordan, Utah 84095

Re: Completeness Determination for Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Application for No Pico Energy Center

Dear Mr. Chandler:

This letter concerns the application completeness status of your application for a Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that would authorize the construction and operation ofthe Pio Pico Energy Center in San Diego County, California. The application is for a 300 MW simple cycle natural gas-fired power plant.

We received your preliminary PSD application materials in April 2011. You have since provided EPA with a stand-alone PSD application as well as supplemental information necessary for processing the PSD permit application on numerous occasions. We received the final information necessary for processing the application on June 5, 2012. Pursuant to 40 CFR sections 52.21 and 124.3, EPA has determined the application to be complete.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Roger Kohn at 415- 972-3973 or

kohn .rogerepa.gov.

Sincerely,

/‘ j

..‘

(3erardo C. Rios

Chief, Permits Office

cc: Steve Hill. Sierra Research

Torn Weeks, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District

Eric K. Solorio, California Energy Commission

Michael Tolistrup, California Air Resources Board

Prinred on Recycled Paper
# C_2005006EN.01003401.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/34

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 October 2004

in Joined Cases T-219/02 and T-337/02: Olga Lutz Herrera v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Open Competition - Non-admission to test - Notice of competition - Age limit)

(2005/C 6/66)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Joined Cases T-219/02 and T-337/02: Olga Lutz Herrera, resident in Brussels, (Belgium) represented by J.-R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier and J. Guillem Carrau, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, assisted by J. Rivas Andrés and Guitiérrezz Gisbert, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decisions of the selection board in Competition COM/A/6/01 of 31 July 2001 and of the selection board in Competition COM/A/10/01 of 20 December 2001 refusing to admit the applicant to those tests on the ground that she exceeded the age limit and, in the alternative, applications for annulment of the rejection of the administrative complaints lodged by the applicant against the decisions of the selection boards in Competitions COM/A/6/01 and COM/A/10/01) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the applications. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the applications.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233 of 28.9.2002.

1

---
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger GP Trust, sole
general partner of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating
     Partnership for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report")
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated: May 7, 2004                  /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
       --------------------         --------------------------------------------
                                    Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                                    Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP
                                    Trust
                                    Sole General Partner of the Registrant
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Learning Care Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 23, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
  The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ Frank M. JerneycicFrank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer
  and TreasurerSeptember 3, 2004
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 21-0598

Filed June 30, 2021

IN THE INTEREST OF A.S., A.S. and D.S.,

Minor Children,

D.S., Father,

Appellant,

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Sioux County, Daniel P. Vakulskas, 

District Associate Judge.

A father appeals the juvenile court’s order regarding permanency review 

and removal. AFFIRMED.

Jared Weber, Orange City, for appellant father.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee State.

Kelsey Bauerly Langel of Bauerly & Langel, P.L.C., Le Mars, attorney and 

guardian ad litem for minor children.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Tabor and Mullins, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

A father appeals the juvenile court’s order regarding permanency review 

and removal, alleging the district court erred in (1) not forcing a child to appear in 

violation of Iowa Code section 232.91 (2020) and (2) finding clear and convincing 

evidence of imminent harm leading to removal. “We generally review [child-inneed-of-assistance] proceedings and termination of parental rights proceedings de 

novo.” In re J.C., 857 N.W.2d 495, 500 (Iowa 2014). 

Petitions on appeal must “substantially comply with form 5 in rule 6.1401.” 

Iowa R. App. P. 6.201(1)(d). Rule 6.1401–Form 5 specifically directs the petition 

on appeal to “include supporting legal authority for each issue raised, including 

authority contrary to [the] case, if known.” Accord Iowa R. App. P. 6.903(2)(g)(3)

(requiring arguments in briefs to contain reasoning, citations to authorities, and 

references to pertinent parts of the record). The petition on appeal raises two 

issues, and each issue cites one code section the father alleges was violated. The 

father cites no case law or other legal authority. In the course of the “findings of 

fact or conclusions of law with which you disagree” sections of his petition he cites 

to no supporting legal authority for any part of his arguments. 

On the first issue, he complains the children were not forced to appear in 

violation of Iowa Code section 232.91. His argument focuses on his right under 

section 232.91 to have them appear. He cites no authority in support of his 

apparent claim that section affords him such a right. Thus, he has waived that 

issue. See Iowa Rs. App. P. 6.201(1)(d), .903(2)(g)(3), .1401–Form 5.

On the second issue, other than the bare citation to section 232.95, he cites 

no legal authority in support of the arguments he asserts concerning burden of 
3

proof or imminent risk of physical harm.1 We find the father has waived this issue 

as well. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.201(1)(d), .903(2)(g)(3), .1401–Form 5.

We affirm.

AFFIRMED.

 

1

In comparison, the State’s response to the petition cites case law and statutes in 

support of its response.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                              MEHLAND DEVELOPERS
                           521 BYERS ROAD, SUITE 201
              MIAMISBURG, OHIO 45342   937/866-1974  FAX 866-2952



                               ADDENDUM TO LEASE

                              SECOND TERM RENEWAL

                               OCTOBER 23, 2000



BETWEEN:        Lessor - Mehland Developers
                Lessee - Geerlings & Wade

LEASE DATED:    October 31, 1994

SECTION:        5.  OPTIONS TO RENEW:

                The Lease shall be renewed for one additional term of three (3)
                years, commencing on March 2, 2001 through February 28, 2004.

SECTION:        6.  RENEWAL TERM RENT:

                Rent for the second renewal term shall be increased yearly based
                on the CPI.


All other conditions of the Lease shall remain in effect.



LESSEE:                                 LESSOR:

GEERLINGS & WADE                        MEHLAND DEVELOPERS
960 Turnpike Street                     521 Byers Road, Suite 201
Canton, MA 02021                        Miamisburg, OH 45342


BY: /s/ David R. Pearce, President      BY: /s/ M. Metzger
    ------------------------------          --------------

DATE: 11/7/00                           DATE: 10/23/00
      -------                                 --------