alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Anaerobic Digester, Composting Facility, Nutrient Management, Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane, Roofs and Covers, Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,355,235
<SECURITIES>                                41,638,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,765,684
<PP&E>                                       6,276,083
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,214,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,430,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,010,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,682
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,409,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,430,988
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,275,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,502,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,502,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,502,655)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Cover, Contour Buffer Strips, Cover Crop, Critical Area Planting, Cross Wind Trap Strips, Herbaceous Wind Barriers, Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Water Management, Mulching, Nutrient Management, Residue and Tillage Management-Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management-No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management-Ridge Till, Residue Management-Seasonal, Terrace, Spoil Spreading, Stream Habitat Improvement and Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

         Telefonica del Peru S.A.A. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended 2002 (the "Report").

         I, Antonio Villa Mardon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

               c.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               d.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Antonio Villa Mardon
    ------------------------
    Name:  Antonio Villa Mardon
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 26, 2003
# Source Water Collaborative Webinar: Updating the USDA NRCS High Priority Source Water Protection Areas

New HampshireWaterNational Water Quality InitiativeSource Water Protection

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  Source Water Collaborative Webinar: Updating the USDA NRCS High Priority Source Water Protection Areas 

This Source Water Collaborative webinar will focus on the 2024 opportunity to update the USDA NRCS high priority source water protection areas and agricultural and forestry practices, in particular climate-smart practices that can be added this year. 

## Registration

For more information and to register - please see the link below. 

See the SWC announcement here.

Featuring Dave White and Kevin Norton, this Source Water Collaborative webinar will focus on the 2024 opportunity to update the USDA NRCS high priority source water protection areas and agricultural and forestry practices, in particular climate-smart practices that can be added this year. Landowners can receive up to 90% incentive payments for implementing these practices to protect drinking water sources. The webinar will also address the selection/update of watersheds under the National Water Quality Initiative (NWQI) and Mississippi River Basin Initiative (MRBI). In addition, participants will learn about a drinking water utility’s successful experience working with NRCS State Technical Committee and NRCS staff.

**For more information and to register,****see the SWC announcement here****.**
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

Onyx Software Canada Corporation, an Ontario
subsidiary;
Onyx Software UK Limited, a United Kingdom
subsidiary;
Market Solutions Limited, a United Kingdom
subsidiary;
Onyx Software Asia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore
subsidiary;
Onyx Software Australia PTY, Ltd., an Australian
subsidiary;
Onyx Software GmbH, a German subsidiary;
Onyx Software Professional Services GmbH, a German
subsidiary;
Onyx CSN Computer Holding GmbH, a German
subsidiary;
Onyx Software Hong Kong Ltd., a Hong Kong
subsidiary;
Onyx Software Co., Ltd., a Japanese subsidiary
(58%);

DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES
EnCyc, Inc.
Versametrix Corporation
RevenueLab, LLC
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CATHERINE A. FERDETTA

, *

* No. 15

- 835V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: May 10

, 2016

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorney’s fees and costs.

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Daniel R. Gage

, Gage Fiore, LLC

, Lawrenceville, NJ , for Petitioner;

Glenn A. MacLeod , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On March 17, 2016

, petitioner filed a motion for attorney fees. Upon re view

of petitioner’s motion , respondent filed a response

. After a status conference on

May 6, 2016, to discuss petitioner’s attorney fees motion, t he Court awards the s e

amount s

.

On August 5

, 2016, Catherine A. Ferdetta filed a petition for compensation

, alleging that the DTaP vaccine , which s he received on August 16, 2012 , caused

development of a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”).

P etitioner received compensation based upon the parties’ proffer

. Decision

, issued

January 1 , 201 6

. Because petitioner received compensation, s he is en titled to an

award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

1 T he E

- Government Act , 44 § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website.

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of

medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any

redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement

indicating petitioner incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses.

After reviewing the petitioner’s reques t, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $ 19,958.4 0, in the form of a check made payable to

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Daniel R. Gage , for attorneys’ fees and

other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

The Court th anks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be direct ed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357

-

6360

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
#### Will of Dodge: Manson, Contestant, Appellant, vs. Estate of Dodge, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Eberlein & Larson*of Shawano.

For the respondent: *P. J. Winter*of Shawano.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### STATE v. OWENS.

*«Prosecutor*— Costs.

*-A*judgment against a prosecutor for costs, is not irregular if rendered in his absence ; and the judge who tries the ease has the exclusive right to determine whether he shall be so taxed.

*(State v. Spencer,*81 N. C., 519, cited and approved.)

*566Appeal from an order' taxing the prosecutor with costs,, made at Fall Term, 1882, of Transylvania Superior Court,, by *Shepherd, J.*

At spring term, 1881, an indictment for perjury was preferred against one Alfred Cantwell, upon which John Owens, the defendant of record in this appeal, was marked as the prosecutor, at the time and before the finding of the bill.

At spring term, 1882, the cause was tried and the defendant, Cantwell, was acquitted, and the presiding judge-(Gilliam), after declaring the prosecution to have been malicious, ordered that the defendant, Owens, so marked as prosecutor, should pay the costs of the prosecution and the feesof certain of the defendant’s witnesses, whose materiality was certified by his attorneys.

At fall term, *1882, the costs not having been paid, and the defendant, being then in the custody of the sheriff, filed, an affidavit, setting forth that though present at the trial of the indictment for perjury against Cantwell, he left the court before the judgment requiring him to pay the costs was rendered, and had therefore no opportunity to controvert the facts found by the court, either as to the malicious-character of the prosecution, or the materiality of the witnesses who had been examined for the defence, and thereupon moved the court to set aside the judgment directing: him to be taxed with the costs and fees of the defendant’s-witnesses. This the court refused to do, and the defendant, appealed. ,

*Attorney General*and *Mr. G. A. Shuford,*for the State.

No counsel for defendant.

Rufein, J.

The-defendant’s motion to vacate the order-taxing him with the-costs of the main prosecution-and the-fees of the necessary witnesses for the defence thereof, was-properly overruled.. Indeed,.it is- much to be questioned. *567whether it was proper to entertain it at all, since the statute gives to the judge, who tries the cause, the exclusive right to determine these matters.

Of course, however, if he proceed irregularly and contrary to the course of the court, the party affected is entitled to be relieved, and he may be so at a subsequent term. We infer that in this case His Honor consented to hear the motion only upon this ground — that the absence of the defendant at the time the order against him was made might possibly render it irregular.

Viewing the case in this light, the ruling of the court, in refusing the motion is fully supported by the decision in *State*v. Spencer, 81 N. C., 519, where it is held, that the presence of a prosecutor on the trial of the defendant is in law a presence to answer a motion to tax him with the costs because of his false clamor, and that a judgment rendered against him for such costs is not irregular, though actually rendered in his absence.

No error. Affirmed.
#### Maliszewski and wife, Appellants, vs. Rozner, Respondent.

For the appellants: *A. H. Eberlein*of Wausau and *Lehner & Lehner*of Oconto Falls.

For the respondent: *W. E. Atwell*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed; no costs to' be taxed for respondent’s brief because of failure to comply with the rule.
# C_2004314EN.01001401.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-56/02: Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Competition - Article 81 EC - Price-fixing agreement and ways of charging for currency exchange services - Germany - Procedure in default)

(2004/C 314/35)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-56/02: Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, established in Munich (Germany), represented by W. Knapp, T. Müller-Ibold and B. Bergmann, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty — (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) (OJ 2003 L 15, p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2003/25/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E — 1/37.919 (ex 37.391) — Bank charges for exchanging euro-zone currencies — Germany) in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1982 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1982

To authorize funding to increase access to mental health care treatment 
                        to reduce gun violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 
 on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize funding to increase access to mental health care treatment 
                        to reduce gun violence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mental Health Access and Gun 
Violence Prevention Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Suicide is the leading cause of gun related deaths in 
        America. More than 60 percent of deaths by guns in the country 
        are the result of individuals using these weapons as a means to 
        commit suicide. Some of these deaths might have been prevented 
        if there were adequate background checks.
            (2) Victims of domestic abuse are more likely to become 
        victims of homicide when a gun is present. Further, individuals 
        who suffer from mental illnesses are more likely to be victims 
        rather than perpetrators of violence.
            (3) Approximately 1 in 4 American adults have a mental 
        illness and nearly half of all adults in America will develop 
        at least one mental illness during their lifetime.
            (4) Less than half of children and adults with diagnosable 
        mental health problems receive the treatment they need.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING TO INCREASE ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH 
              CARE TREATMENT TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General of 
the United States, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the 
Commissioner of Social Security $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2018 to 
carry out programs and activities authorized by provisions of law other 
than this Act--
            (1) to increase access to mental health care treatment and 
        services; and
            (2) to encourage and assist the reporting of relevant 
        disqualifying mental health information to the National Instant 
        Criminal Background Check System.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005066EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 March 2005

(2005/C 66/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3378 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69590 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1023 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5471 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5831 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,978 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,84 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4326 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1171 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 670 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,68 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,775 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7886 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6876 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6140 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4346 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8010 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1717 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2177 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3378

JPY

Japanese yen

139,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69590

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1023

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5471

ISK

Iceland króna

78,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5831

CZK

Czech koruna

29,978

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,84

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4326

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1171

ROL

Romanian leu

36 670

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,68

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,775

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7886

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6876

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6140

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4346

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8010

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1717

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,94

ZAR

South African rand

8,2177

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### FAA-2015-2605 October 4, 2015
Thank you for your consideration and your letter, dated September 10, 2015. I would like to take a moment to respond to your question regarding my UAS operation and the benefit to the public as a whole. Public Benefit 1: A safe alternative to traditional “manned” aircraft In lieu of flying traditional “manned” aircraft, the precision guidance of the DJI Phantom 3 allows for low altitude flight without the risk of endangering persons in the air or on the ground. The return to home features, realtime view, mapping and guidance system all allow the pilot in command to stay clear of the ground population. Public Benefit 2: Zero emission flight In lieu of flying large aircraft which consumes gasoline and produces carbon emissions and noise pollution, the small DJI Phantom UAS has a small eco footprint. The public benefits from zero emissions flight because the DJI Phantom is battery powered and will not produce carbon emissions in flight. Public Benefit 3: Search and Rescue, Human Safety, City Services My proposed services would also include volunteer services such as search and rescue, law enforcement assistance when called upon, news media assistance when called upon, and assistance to the City of Waukee, Iowa when called upon. The public would benefit from having additional health and human services support when the city is in need. Some examples would include search and rescue, area analysis in the event of a natural disaster, topographical imaging for agriculture and city services. I do not have any other information, views, or arguments to add at this time. If requested, I could provide a statement by the City of Waukee as to why my services would be beneficial to the city and the citizens of my city. I sincerely hope this answers your questions. My goal is to abide by the regulations set forth by the Administration and if there is anything I can do to further assist you, please don’t hesitate to contact me. I apologize for the delayed response to your letter; I was on business travel and vacation for the majority of September and received the notice at the end of September. Sincerely,

Cameron Stotz

### FAA-2015-2605 October 4, 2015

### FAA-2015-2605 October 4, 2015