alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Access Road , Conservation Cover, Critical Area Planting, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Filter Strip, Grade Stabilization Structure, Hillside Ditch, Integrated Pest Management, Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control, Land Smoothing, Mine Shaft & Adit Closing, Mulching, Nutrient Management, Obstruction Removal, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Sediment Basin, Spoil Spreading, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Parts 37 and 52
          - [FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2014-008; Correction; Docket 2014-0008; Sequence No. 1]
          - RIN 9000-AM84

# AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a correction to FAR Case 2014-008; Management and Oversight of the Acquisition of Services (Item II), which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 80 FR 4992, January 29, 2015.                    

# DATE:

*Effective:*                         March 2, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, at 202-208-4949, for clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2014-008; Correction.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In rule FR Doc. 2015-01525 published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 80 FR 4992, January 29, 2015, make the following correction:                

On page 4993, in the third column, line 22, correct “Mar 2015” to read “(Mar 2015)”.

Authority:40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.

Dated: February 3, 2015.

William Clark,

Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02541 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
# L_2015331EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2350

of 16 December 2015

implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

| (2) | One person and two entities should no longer be kept on the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

One person and two entities should no longer be kept on the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

| (3) | Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

For the Council

The President

C. DIESCHBOURG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The person and two entities listed below, as well as their related entries, are hereby deleted from the list set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012:

A.   Persons

No 205 Samir Hamsho

B.   Entities

No 68. Syria Steel SA

No 69. Al Buroj Trading

---
Dave Heineman Gove rn o r

Karen Flournoy, Director 

### JUN 

## 52012
Water, Wetlands and Pesticides Division (WWPD) USEPA Region 7 901 North Fifth Street Kansas City, Kansas 66101 

### STATE OF NEBRASKA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Michael J. Linder Direc to r Suite 400 , Th e Atrium 1200 ' N' S tree t P.O. Box 9892 2 Linc oln , Nebras k a 685 0 9

-89 2 2 Pho ne (40 2)471

-2 1 86

FAX ( 4 0 2) 4 71

-29 0 9 website : www .deq .s tate. ne. us

RE: State Water Quality Certification for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel Permit, in waters ofthe State of Nebraska. Dear Ms. Flournoy: We have reviewed the information received regarding the above-referenced application under the authority of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 , as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987. Chapter 6, § 004 of Title 117- Nebraska's Surface Water Quality Standards, states that: "No discharge of wastewater from domestic , municipal, or industrial sources shall be allowed directly into lakes or impounded waters except: "004.01 Wastewater from sources authorized by NPDES permits to discharge to these waters prior to May 10, 1982 which have operated under active NPDES permits since then. "004.02 Noncontact cooling waters from sources authorized by NPDES permits to discharge to these waters. "004.03 Stormwater from sources authorized by NPDES permits to discharge to these waters ." This precludes allowing discharges into lakes and reservoirs of greywater; bilge water, or any sewage commingled with any other discharge as described in the permits and in Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 236, pp 76716 through 76725. Vessels on these waters will need to discharge these wastewaters into sanitary dump stations that do not result in a discharge to lakes or impounded waters. Cooling water discharges are allowed. Use of these General Permits for vessels operating on streams of the State ofNebraska is acceptable. With that condition observed, use of these General Permits for vessels operating on streams of the State ofNebraska is acceptable.

An Equal Opp o rtunity/ Affirmative A c ti o n Employer @ P r i nted w ith soy ink o n recyc l ed paper

**~**We therefore, by this letter, provide Section 401 Water Quality Certification. This certification does not constitute authorization to conduct your project. It is a statement of compliance with Surface Water Quality Standards only, which is one requirement to gain authorization from the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers in the form of a Section 404 permit. If

_you have any questions, please feel free to call Jason Garber on my staff, at (402) 471-2875. Sincerely,
Marty Link Associate Director, Acting Water Quality Division Administrator

cc: John Moeschen, US Army Corps of Engineers Lourdes Mena, US Fish & Wildlife Service Carey Grell, Nebraska Game & Parks Commission Eliodora Chamberlain, US Environmental Protection Agency
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                        OF NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Six Months       Six Months      Three Months     Three Months
                                           Ended 6/30/02    Ended 6/30/01    Ended 6/30/02    Ended 6/30/01
                                           -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>              <C>             <C>
Net earnings (loss)                        $(1,694,000)     $(1,907,000)     $   146,000     $(1,091,000)
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========     ===========

Earnings (Loss) Per Share - Primary
-----------------------------------
Weighted average shares  outstanding
    during the period                        5,470,311        5,470,311        5,470,311       5,470,311
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========     ===========


Earnings (loss) per common share
-Primary                                   $      (.31)     $      (.35)     $       .03     $      (.20)
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========     ===========
Earning (Loss) Per Share - Diluted
----------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                        5,470,311        5,470,311        5,470,311       5,470,311


Common and Common Stock equivalent
shares using the treasury stock method               0                0                0               0
                                           -----------      -----------      -----------     -----------

Total shares outstanding for purposes
of calculating diluted earnings              5,470,311        5,470,311        5,470,311       5,470,311
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========     ===========


Earnings (loss) per common and common
Equivalent share - Diluted                 $      (.31)     $      (.35)     $       .03     $      (.20)
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2020

LEGEND

Pathway

Trails and Walkways (575)

D.2 (+) Livestock 

access to forage, 

constructed water 

sources, shelter, and/or 

handling/milking 

facilities

1. Establish a trail or walkway 

I.2 (+) Wildlife 

species diversity

Initial setting: Grazing lands where 

improvement in access to forage, water, and 

shelter; diversion from ecological sites; or 

travel through difficult areas is needed

I.3 (-) Contaminants, 

pathogens, nutrients, and 

sediment to surface water

C.1 (+) Water quality and aquatic 

habitats

I.7 (+) Plant 

condition and 

productivity

C.3 (+) Income and

income stability 

(individuals and

community)

D.3 (+) Grazing 

efficiency and 

distribution

C.2 (+) Public/private health, safety, 

and aesthetics

I.8 (+) Livestock 

productivity

I.13 (-) Overall cost to 

farmers

Start

D.1 (-) Access to 

ecologically sensitive 

areas, erosive areas, or 

water bodies

Mitigating practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Access 

Control (472) 

b

Stream Crossing (578)

Fence (382)

Structure for Water 

Control (587)

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Associated practice

I.4 (-) Noxious algal and 

weed growth

I.5 (+) Dissolved oxygen 

in surface waters

I.10 (-) 

Maintenance 

costs

I.9 (-) Wear and 

tear on 

equipment

I.12 (-) Erosion

I.14 (+) 

Recreational 

opportunities

I.1 (+) Wildlife 

habitat

I.6 (+) Firebreaks

I.11 (-) 

Compaction

D.4 (+) A

construc
EXHIBIT 10.1



            COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

           The following information is as of May 13, 2005:

           On April 12, 2005, KSW, Inc. (the "Company") approved the annual base
salaries (effective as of January 1, 2005) of certain executive officers of the
Company. The following table sets forth the annual base salary levels of the
following named executive officers of the Company (as of January 1, 2005) for
the year ending December 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004:

Name and Principal Position            Year        Salary
---------------------------            ----        ------

Richard W. Lucas                       2005       $125,000
Chief Financial Officer                2004       $115,000

James F. Oliviero                      2005       $170,000
General Counsel                        2004       $160,000


           Also on April 12, 2005, the Company authorized the award of cash
bonuses to certain executive officers of the Company. The following table sets
forth cash bonuses in respect of the year ending December 31, 2005 and the year
ended December 31, 2004 for the following named executive officers:

Name and Principal Position            Year        Bonus
---------------------------            ----        -----

Richard W. Lucas                       2005       $20,000
Chief Financial Officer                2004       $20,000

James F. Oliviero                      2005       $30,000
General Counsel                        2004       $30,000


           The Company may terminate the employment of Messrs. Lucas and
Oliviero at will.
# C_2005044EN.01000101.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 February 2005

(2005/C 44/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3039 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6891 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0914 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5475 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,68 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,288 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5830 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,893 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4309 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9904 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 168 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,75 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,05 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7040 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6590 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6051 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1703 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8120 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1359 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7296 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3039

JPY

Japanese yen

137,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6891

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0914

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5475

ISK

Iceland króna

80,68

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,288

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5830

CZK

Czech koruna

29,893

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4309

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9904

ROL

Romanian leu

36 168

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,75

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,05

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7040

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6590

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6051

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1703

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8120

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1359

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,32

ZAR

South African rand

7,7296

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00068-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.M.N., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-02-1095-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Appellee, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, is exempt from all costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 29, 2024
#### Estate of Happ: First Trust Company in Oshkosh and another, Appellants, vs. Spoo, Respondent.

For the appellant First Trust Company: *Williams & Williams,*attorneys, and *R. A. Hollister*of counsel, all of Oshkosh.

For the appellant Fred Stanhilber: *Harold M. Wilkie'oí*Madison.

For the respondent: *Thompsons, Gnienewald & Frye*of Oshkosh.

*By the Court.*

Order and judgment affirmed.
Workbook Contents

U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data

Worksheet Name Description

Data 1 U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

Release Date: 1/7/2014

Next Release Date: 1/31/2014

Excel File Name: n9190us3a.xls

Available from Web Page: http://tonto.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9190us3a.htm

Source: Energy Information Administration

For Help, Contact: infoctr@eia.doe.gov

(202) 586-8800
# Of Series Frequency Latest Data for

1 Annual 2012

1/7/2014 3:01:20 PM
Back to Contents Data 1: U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

Sourcekey N9190US3

Date

U.S. Natural Gas 

Wellhead Price 

(Dollars per 

Thousand Cubic 

Feet)

1922 0.11

1923 0.1

1924 0.09

1925 0.09

1926 0.1

1927 0.09

1928 0.09

1929 0.08

1930 0.08

1931 0.07

1932 0.06

1933 0.06

1934 0.06

1935 0.06

1936 0.06

1937 0.05

1938 0.05

1939 0.05

1940 0.05

1941 0.05

1942 0.05

1943 0.05

1944 0.05

1945 0.05

1946 0.05

1947 0.06

1948 0.07

1949 0.06

1950 0.07

1951 0.07

1952 0.08

1953 0.09

1954 0.1

1955 0.1

1956 0.11

1957 0.11

1958 0.12

1959 0.13

1960 0.14

1961 0.15

1962 0.16

1963 0.16

1964 0.15

1965 0.16

1966 0.16
1967 0.16

1968 0.16

1969 0.17

1970 0.17

1971 0.18

1972 0.19

1973 0.22

1974 0.3

1975 0.44

1976 0.58

1977 0.79

1978 0.91

1979 1.18

1980 1.59

1981 1.98

1982 2.46

1983 2.59

1984 2.66

1985 2.51

1986 1.94

1987 1.67

1988 1.69

1989 1.69

1990 1.71

1991 1.64

1992 1.74

1993 2.04

1994 1.85

1995 1.55

1996 2.17

1997 2.32

1998 1.96

1999 2.19

2000 3.68

20014

2002 2.95

2003 4.88

2004 5.46

2005 7.33

2006 6.39

2007 6.25

2008 7.97

2009 3.67

2010 4.48

2011 3.95

2012 2.66
d Cubic Feet)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 26031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10679]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Wellness Programs Under Federal Equal Employment Opportunity 
Laws.

    Note:  In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4077.

    Dated: May 1, 2013.
Bernadette B. Wilson,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2013-10679 Filed 5-1-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
# C_2005082EN.01003401.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/34

---

Action brought on 10 January 2005 by France Télécom against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-17/05)

(2005/C 82/63)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 January 2005 by France Télécom, having its principal place of business in Paris, represented by Antoine Gosset-Grainville and Laurent Godfroid, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | annul Decision No C(2004)3061 adopted by the Commission on 2 August 2004 concerning State aid implemented by France in favour of France Télécom; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul Decision No C(2004)3061 adopted by the Commission on 2 August 2004 concerning State aid implemented by France in favour of France Télécom;

| 2. | the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant in the present case are identical to those which it put forward in Case T-427/04.

---