alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE NRO STAFF 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728 

l:ai"~rott-H-

~TIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

l llllU\I1II1I1II Rllll~ll~~il~l!lll llll llllllll\ \Ill 

July 1, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR SAFSP 

SUBJECT: Proposed Personal Services Contract with Dr. Aden B. 

Meinel 

Attached are the signed originals of the D&F authorizing the 

negotiation of subject contract and the letter waiving certain of the 

requirements under AFR 25-4. 

1 :.· ✓, / ' . .,,:;....--

. R. MECEDA 

aptain, USAF 

Asst Deputy Director for 

Plans & Policy 

2 Attachments 

1. Author to negotiate contract 

2. Waiver of Rqmts under AFR 25-4 

1mir1rr1i 1111111 11 f 111 lfll II II II II II II II II I 1111111111111 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

HANDLE VIA ID SESRET CONTROL NO BYE -1 2 9 9 5 - 6 9 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728 

COPY &: or .::a..... COPIES 

c>O 
.. Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728 

SECRET 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

Determinations and Findings 

Authority to Negotiate Contract 

Atch 1, 1 page 

I hereby find that this procurement is for the services of 

Dr. Aden B. Meinel of the University of Arizona., as a consultant 

to the Air Force on optical systems and materials, advanced 

technology and exploratory research beyond the state-of-the-art 

related to satellite reconnaissance, for a period of approximately twelve months, in the amount of approximately $10,000.00; 

that Dr. Meinel is a widely recognized authority of unusual 

competence and skill and eminently qualified in this field; that 

Air Force personnel with th~ necessary skills are not available; 

that the required services a.re advantageous to the national 

defense; that such services will not be used as a means of 

circumventing manpower space ceilings; that the duties to be 

performed a.re of a temporary or intermittent nature; and that 

the services required can be obtained only by contract. 

I hereby determine that this procurement is for personal, professional services and is required in the interest of national 

defense. 

I further determine that the use of formal advertising would be 

impractical because of the unique, personal nature of the 

services in question. 

Upon the basis of the above findings and determinations, I hereby 

authorize the negotiation of a contract for this procurement 

pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2304(a)(4). 

1mnrr1i1111111 11 ff 111111111111111111111111111111111111 

SECRETApproved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728 

mNt>l.t VIJ:\ BYEMAN 

CONTROL: SYSTEM ONL.Y 
, 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728 Atcb 2, 1 page 

SECRET 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20330 

SUBJECT: Waiver of Certain Requirements Under AFR 25-4 

TO: SAFSP ( General Martin) 

In connection with Contrac ~-------~ 

the requirements of paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 a.nd 9 of' 

AFR 25-4, 21 June 196o, are waived. 

S

ECRR HANDLE Vfli BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111728
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Parent                                Subsidiary
------                                ----------
<S>                                   <C>
U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.             U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd, a Delaware
                                      corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.             Clean Earth, Inc., a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.             U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance Corporation, a
                                      Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd.              The Eaglebrook Group, Inc., a Delaware
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Advanced Remediation of Delaware, Inc., a
                                      Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Allied Waste Services, Inc., a Delaware
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Barbella Environmental Technology, Inc., a
                                      New Jersey corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Barbella Environmental Technology of New
                                      Jersey, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Earth of Carteret, Inc.,  a Delaware
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Carteret Asphalt Corporation, a Delaware
                                      Corporation*

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Earth of New Castle, Inc., a Delaware
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Earth of Philadelphia, Inc., a
                                      Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Earth of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Rock Properties, Ltd., a Maryland
                                      corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Consolidated Technologies, Inc., a
                                      Pennsylvania corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Integrated Technical Services, Inc. a
                                      Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                     Clean Earth of North Jersey, Inc., a New
                                      Jersey corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance           U.S. Plastic Lumber IP Corporation, a
Corporation                           Delaware corporation
</TABLE>


* - 80.1% owned.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112299 l')HK- e> · d :5 . HAr/Dl E VI/\ 

I Hi' ~lliKt I 

I lllllllllillllll 1111111111111111111111111 lllll 111111111111111111 14 000312120 

CONTROL ~Y5i£M 

_J>-r'NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NR0 STAFF September 19, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. COYNE 

SUBJECT: Proposed LaunG,_hing Schedule 

Pursuant to your request this morning, I have attached for 

Admiral Anderson's use a listing of our proposed photographic 

satellite launchings for the 12 month period July 1, 1969 to 

June 30, 1970. 

I trust this information responds to your need. 

4 //////) ( /JI; I -----1 ·,,__,,,.,., /'"---., 

LEW ALLEN, JR. 

Colonel, USAF 

Director 

Attachment 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONlROL SYSTEM 

Proposed Launching Schedule 

T8P SECRET EXCLUDED f"ROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112299 

CONTROL NO BYE 13 2 D 5 - 6 9 

COPY ~ Qi'" COr1 t.-" 

-~- PAGE 1 OF" 2 PAGE:> 

C/()9 - /q - C>O-::::; 
j 

j 

l 

l 

1 

4 

' 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Mission Number 

1107 

4323 

1052 

4324 

1108 

4325 

1109 

4326 

4327 

1110 

4328 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112299 

':FOP SEC!tl!: I 

PROPOSED PHOTOGRAPHIC SATELLITE LAUNCHINGS 

July 1, 1969 to June 30, 1970 

Codeword Purpose Ground Resolution 

CORONA Broad Coverage '* 5 - 10 feet 

GAMBIT High Re solution >{<>~ 

CORONA Broad Coverage 5 - 10 feet 

GAMBIT High Resolution 

CORONA Broad Coverage 5 - 10 feet 

GAMBIT High Re solution 

CORONA Broad Coverage 5 - 10 feet 

GAMBIT High Re solution 

GAMBIT High Resolution 

CORONA Broad Coverage 5 - 10 feet 

GAMBIT High Re solution 

Dates on Orbit 

23 Jul - 11 Aug 

23 Aug - 6 Sept 

22 Sept - 8 Oct 

21 Oct - 4 Nov 

26 Nov - 15 Dec 

13 - 27 Jan 

18 Feb - 9 Mar 

17 - 31 Mar 

28 Apr - 14 May 

20 May - 8 Jun 

16 Jun - 2 Jul 

* Approximately 7. 1 million square nautical miles are covered with stereo photography on 

typical CORONA mission; about 70 percent of photography is 90-100 percent cloud free. 

** Approximately 600 targets/day are photographed on typical GAMBIT mission; about 60 

percent of photography contains interpretable imagery. 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112299
# C_2004284EN.01000101.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 30 September 2004

in Case C-275/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart): Engin Ayaz v Land Baden-Württemberg (1)

1

(EEC-Turkey Association - Freedom of movement for workers - First paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Personal scope - Concept of ‘member of the family’ of a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State - Stepson of such a worker)

(2004/C 284/01)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-275/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany), made by decision of 11 July 2002, received at the Court on 26 July 2002, in the proceedings between Engin Ayaz and Land Baden-Württemberg — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), and F. Macken, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

The first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Economic Community and Turkey, is to be interpreted as meaning that a stepson who is under the age of 21 years or is a dependant of a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State is a member of the family of that worker, for the purposes of that provision, and enjoys the rights conferred on him by that decision, provided that he has been duly authorised to join that worker in the host Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 26.10.2002.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0077

CITY OF WHITEFISH,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

PHILIP ARGALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 7, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 1 2020

07/01/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0077
# C_2005140EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 June 2005

(2005/C 140/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2324 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4446 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67095 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5336 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,54 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5744 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,094 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0611 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 144 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6840 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6013 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5351 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5893 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7221 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0462 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 239,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2235 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,20 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 812,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6831 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,418 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,995 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2324

JPY

Japanese yen

131,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4446

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67095

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5336

ISK

Iceland króna

78,54

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5744

CZK

Czech koruna

30,094

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0611

ROL

Romanian leu

36 144

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,52

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,575

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6840

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6013

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5351

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5893

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7221

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0462

KRW

South Korean won

1 239,49

ZAR

South African rand

8,2235

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,20

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 812,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6831

PHP

Philippine peso

67,418

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9500

THB

Thai baht

49,995

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Gilla, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Georges Benarroch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Georges BenarrochGeorges BenarrochPresident & Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial Officer,and principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### * JAMES W. GRANT, Adm’r, v. JOSEPH J. BELL.

*Account and Settlement*— Executors *and Administra,tors.*

In an action for an account and settlement, the death of the' defendant being suggested, his executor comes in and is made a party defendant and moves for leave to file an answer denying that he has assets; *Meld,*that the question of assets does not arise here, and the motion' cannot be allowed. If plaintiff obtains judgment, it only ascertains the debt which must share in the assets that may come into the executor’s hands, according to its dignity, when the estate is settled.

*(Holmes*v. *Foster,*78 N. C., 35, and eases cited, approved.)

Civil Action for account and settlement, tried at Spring-Term, 1880, of Northampton Superior Court, before *Oudger, J.*

*Messrs. R. B. Peebles*and *T. N.Hill,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Mullen & Moore, Day & Zollicoffer*and *J. B. Batchelor*for defendant.

*

 Smith, C. J., did not sit on the hearing of this case.

Merrimon, J.

This appeal came into this court at October term, 1880, and has been here continuously ever since. See *Grant v. Bell,*87 N. C., 34, and 90 N. C., 558.

At the present term it is made to appear to this court that the defendant has died since the last terra, leaving a last will and testament; that the same has been duly proved, and that R. 0. Edwards has qualified as executor thereof.

The death of the defendant is suggested and the executor ■ comes and asks that he be made a party defendant in the place of his testator, and be allowed to file an answer, denying that he has assets, &c.

*496It appears from the record that the canse of action survives, and that the suit is not for the recovery of a penalty or damages merely vindictive. The case is a proper one in which to allow the executor to be made a party defendant, and the motion in this respect is allowed.

The proposed answer is not a proper pleading in this action. The question of assets dr no assets does not arise in it. IUthe plaintiff shall obtain judgment for his debt, such judgment will only ascertain his debt, and it will share in the settlement of the estate, according to its dignity, in the assets that are or may come into the hands of the executor to pay the debts. The Code, § 1470; *Vaughan*v. *Stephenson,*69 N. C., 212; *Dunn*v. *Barnes,*73 N. C., 273; *Holmes*v. *Foster,*78 N. C., 35.

8o much of the executor’s motion as asks to be allowed to file an answer must be denied. Let an order be drawn accordingly.

Judgment accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.01

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                               (JOHN R. EICKHOFF)

This Amendment, dated as of April 18, 2001, amends certain provisions of the
Executive Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), dated as of March 30, 2001,
between Ceridian Corporation and John R. Eickhoff ("Executive"). Unless
otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the
meanings given to them in the Agreement. In consideration of you continuing in
your employment with Ceridian for the remaining term of the Agreement, and the
mutual promises and obligations contained in the Agreement as modified by this
Amendment, Executive and Ceridian agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1.       Section 2.03 of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read
         as follows:

         "2.03    TERM. Subject to the provisions of Articles IV, VII, and VIII,
                  this Agreement and Executive's employment shall continue until
                  the later of: (a) December 31, 2002; and (b) two years after a
                  Change of Control which occurs prior to December 31, 2002."

2.       This Amendment is governed by, and shall be construed in accordance
         with, the laws of the State of Minnesota.

3.       Except as herein expressly amended, the Agreement is ratified and
         confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect in
         accordance with its terms.

4.       This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
         which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
         constitute one and the same instrument.

Ceridian and Executive have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered, and this Amendment shall be effective, as of the date first written
above. Following the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the
Agreement to "this Agreement," "hereunder," "herein," "hereof," or words of like
import shall mean and be a reference to the Agreement as amended by this
Amendment.

EXECUTIVE                          CERIDIAN CORPORATION


/s/ John R. Eickhoff               By: /s/ Shirley J. Hughes
John R. Eickhoff                   Title: Senior Vice President, Human Resources

Address:

----------------------------

----------------------------
#### Cole, Respondent, vs. Will and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Thomas W. King*'of Spring Green.

For the respondent: *Hall, Baker & Hall*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00725-CV

Kenneth Michie, Appellant

v.

Glynn C. Turquand; Walters & Turquand, L.L.P.; and Sarah Bartholomew, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-06-004156, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Kenneth Michie has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal.

Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

____________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 31, 2007
Sharlene R. Matten, PhD

USEPA, OCSPP/OSCP February 24, 2015 **Note to Docket ID., EPA**  **- HQ** **- OPPT**  **- 2014**  **- 0766**  **- 0002,**  **OCSPP 890. 2100:**  **Avian Two -**  **generation Toxicity Test in the Japanese Quail**  **(JQTT) , Public Draft dated 12/172014**  **. Errata –**  **References to Appendix 1 and 7.**  **1. Reference to Appendix 1, p. 13 -**  **14 is incorrect [ see**  **u nderlined text].**  The correct reference is Appendix 6, Histopathology Guidance

. a. First reference, p. 12, Middle of the page. “... Organs including kidneys, liver, spleen, adrenal glands, reproductive organs and associated structures, cloacal gland, bursa, and right thyroid gland should be excised and preserved in Davidson's fixative or a suitable alternative for histopathological examination. A detailed description of excision, fixation, and tissue preparation is provided in Appendix I (pages 3

- 41) of thi s document. ” **Correct reference is Appendix 6 (no page numbers).**  b. Second ref erence, p. 13, Top of the page. “... 14 day old chicks will be fixed in situ. A detailed description of excision, fixation, and tissue preparation is provided in Appendix I (pages 9 3

- 114) of this document. ” **Correct reference is Appendix 6 (no page numbers).**  

### 2. p. 14, Incorrect Reference to Appendix 7. The correct reference should be Appendix 5, Recommendations for Preparation of Samples , where there is a detailed description of sample preparation for blood, thyroid gland, and yolk. a. Incorrect reference to Appendix 7 ( p. 14 ) appears in the following two sentences: A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for thyroid hormone and immunoassay analyses are found in Appendix 7." "A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for steroid hormone and immunoassay analyses are found in Appendix 7." b. Correct reference to Appendix 5. The sentence (it appears twice) should be rewritten as follows, " A detailed description of blood, thyroid gland, and yolk preparation for thyroid (or steroid) hormone analysis and immunoassay is found in Appendix 5."