Glen-Gery Corporation 

Technical Services I Research 

433 South Pottsville Pike 

Shoemakersville, PA 19555 

(61 0) 562-3076 

Fax: (610) 562-2084 

http://www.glengerybrick.com 

January 7, 2011 

CERTIFIED MAIL NO. __ _..!..7~0~10~1~0~60~0~0~0~1.::.2~57.!_!,0~5~6~94.!...._ __ _ 

Mr. Jeffrey Telander 

U.S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

RE: Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Summerville, PA- Jefferson County 

Requirement to provide information according to Title 42 of the United States Code, Chapter 85, 

Subchapter I, Part A, section 7414 (42 U.S.C 7414) 

Dear Mr. Telander: 

The Glen-Gery Corporation received a letter from your office dated November 17, 20 I 0. The purpose of 

the letter was to inform the Glen-Gery Corporation that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

was requesting the following information be submitted by February 28, 20 II: 

• Startup and shutdown events at all brick and structural clay product manufacturing facilities as 

described in your enclosure I. 

• Emissions of hydrogen fluoride, hydrochloric acid, chlorine, metals, and particulate matter from 

the facility tunnel kiln (SID-113). 

The Glen-Gery Corporation, Summerville, PA plant installed a wet scrubbing control device in 2003 at a 

significant cost due to the construction of its newly constructed facility tunnel kiln (SID-113 ). At that 

time, the state of PA used the draft Brick MACT as its basis for requiring a wet scrubber to control 

emissions. 

Since its installation in 2003 stack testing was conducted in April 2005 to prove compliance as well as in 

June 2008 as a condition of its PA State Title V Operating Permit renewal. The June 2008 testing event 

was conducted shortly after the USEPA's 2008 data gathering initiative for the new brick MACT. We 

believe the data from this test event has not yet been submitted to the USEP A. Therefore, included for 

your review is the stack testing report from the June 2008 testing event. Please note that the kiln operated 

within its allowable maximum rates during this testing event. 

Due to the extreme economic situation the exiting market conditions have placed on the entire brick 

manufacturing industry, Glen-Gery respectfully requests the USEPA allow the enclosed June 2008 stack 

testing data to qualify for meeting the majority of the requirements of the 2010 I CR. We are fully aware 

that the June 2008 test results do not include metals, or chlorine, but hope that the hydrogen fluoride, 

hydrogen chloride, and particulate matter data will sufficiently meet the requested stack test data 

requirements as outlined in your November 17, 2010 request. 

The existing market conditions have prompted production curtailments which have not allowed the 

Summerville PA plant to operate at or near its maximum rated capacity over the last year. As of mid-
December 2010, the Summerville, PA plant has been temporarily shut down due to the existing market 

conditions. The plant remains in a "down" state and the restart date is currently unknown but is expected 

to be sometime in spring 2011. In addition, the Glen-Gery Corporation's, Summerville, PA plant is 

categorized as a synthetic minor source for HAP's and will not be subject to the upcoming new Brick 

MACT standards. 

It is Glen-Gery's intent to cooperate fully with the USEPA's request and is willing to assist the EPA in all 

its efforts to gather the information it needs. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, Glen-Gery will 

submit the information request on start-ups and shutdowns by the February 28, 2011 deadline and 

respectfully requests that the agency allow the enclosed 2008 test report to fulfill the requirements of the 

2010 ICR stack testing data request. 

Please contact me at (610) 562-3076 or Mike.Krzyzanowski@oldcastleapg.com if you require any other 

information regarding this testing exemption request. 

oration 

CC: Steve Matsick 

George Robinson 
Compliance Stack Emission 

Test Report 

Determination of Total Filterable Particulate 

Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, 

Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total 

Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric 

Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible 

Emissions 

Ceric Kiln 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A 

Glen-Gery Corporation -Hanley Plant 

Summerville, Pennsylvania 

Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 

Job Number: 080609 

Prepared by: 

Air Compliance 

Testing, Inc. 

PO Box41156 

Cleveland OH 44141·0156 

Phone: {800) EPA·A!R1 (372·2471) 

Report Date: July 31,2008 
Superior Quality 

Emission Testing. 

Valid Results 

Guaranteed. 

Mike Krzyzanowski 

Environmental Manager 

Glen-Gery Corporation- Hanley Plant 

423 South Pottsville Pike 

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 

Dear Mike: 

Air Compliance 

Testing, Inc. 

P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 

1-800-EPA-A/Rt www.aircomp.com 

testing@aircomp.com 

July 31, 2008 

The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on 

June 24 and 25,2008. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA 

Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect 

at the time of this test. 

Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data 

collected during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover 

Jetter (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally, 

you may address, preferably in a timetable format, any obligations or implications that might 

be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test. 

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results. 

On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the 

opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work 

with you again on any additional future testing projects. 

Sincerely, 

v·vUJPhaneendra Uppalapati 

Air Quality Engineer 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Table of Contents 

Page 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 

1.1 Summary of Test Program 2 

1.2 Key Personnel 2 

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3 

2.3 Presentation of Results 4 

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS !5 

3 .I Process Description and Operation 15 

3.2 Control Equipment Description 15 

3 .3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations !5 

3.4 Process Sampling Location !6 

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 20 

4.1 Test Methods 20 

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 22 

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 27 

5 .I QA Audits 27 

5.2 QA/QC Problems 28 

6.0 APPENDIX 40 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Summary of Test Program 

Glen-gery Corporation -Hanley Plant, located in Summerville, Pennsylvania contracted Air Compliance 

Testing, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio to conduct compliance stack emissions testing for their Ceric Kiln (Source 

ID: 113). Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery 

Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008 .. The 

testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008. 

Sampling was performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust 

Stack to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (S02), 

sulfuric acid mist (H2S04), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Sampling was also 

performed at the Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) (as N02), carbon monoxide (CO), and total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMOs). 

Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the product S32. During this 

test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. 

Visible Emissions (YEs) measured as percent opacity were also monitored at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack to determine the maximum six-minute average of opacity. 

The test methods that were conducted during this test were EPA Methods I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 

26A. 

1.2 Key Personnel 

The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were: 

Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076 

John Guth, Air Quality Program Manager, PA DEP- Northwest District Office, 814-332-6940 

Philip J. Billick, President, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 

Sin Hoi Chiew, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 

The purpose of this test was to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, S02, H2S04, HCl, and 

HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine the 

mass emission rate ofNOx (as N02), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. YEs (measured as %-opacity) were also 

determined at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery 

Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. 

The specific test objectives for this test were to: 

Measure the concentration of total filterable PM, S02, H2S04, HCl, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also measure the concentration ofNOxo CO, and 

TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. 

Measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. 

Utilize the above variables to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, S02, H2S04, HCl, and 

HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine 

the mass emission rate ofNOx (as N02), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

Determine the maximum six-minute average of opacity at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 presents the sampling and analytical matrix log for this test. 

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 

The intermediate sampling train leak check performed during Run I at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

yielded a leakage rate which was greater than the allowable leakage rate of 0.020 cfm. Therefore, Run I was 

voided and three additional runs (Runs 2-4) were performed at both the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and the 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Results from Run I are not included in this test rep01t. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

2.3 Presentation of Results 

Two (2) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable 

PM, S02, H2S04, HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct while operating at maximum production 

levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular 

weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCl, and HF and a second sampling train 

measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of 

S02 and H2S04. 

Three (3) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable 

PM, S02, H2S04, HCl, HF, NOx (as N02), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas 

volumetric flow rate, dry molecnlar weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCl, 

and HF and a second sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, 

moisture content, and concentration of S02 and H2S04• A third sampling train was utilized to measure the 

stack gas concentration of NO, CO, and TGNMOs. 

Table 2.2.1 displays the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, HCI, and HF measured at the Ceric Kiln 

Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and the mass emission rate ofNOx (as 

N02), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production 

levels for the product S32. 

Table 2.2.1 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

Table 2.2.2 displays the mass emission rate of S02 and H2S04 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at 

the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

The mass emission rate displayed in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack utilize 

the saturated moisture content values determined for the given stack gas temperatures and pressures as per 

Section 4.0, of EPA Method 4. The measured flue gas percent by volume moisture contents were higlfer 

than the calculated saturated values which is indicative of the presence of entrained moisture droplets in the 

stack gas. 

The concentration of TGNMOs measured during Runs I and 3 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

were reported to be below the accepted EPA Method 25 Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of 50 ppmvd. 

The accepted MDL is approximately I 0-times the analytical laboratory Level of Quantification (LOQ) of 5 

ppmvd. 

Concentration values in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 denoted with a'<' were measured to be below the minimum 

detection limit (MDL) of the applicable analytical method. Mass emission rates denoted with a'<' in Tables 

2.2.1 and 2.2.2 were calculated utilizing the applicable MDL concentration value instead of the "as 

measured" concentration value. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

The graphs that follow Table 2.2.2 present the raw, uncorrected concentration data measured in the field by 

the EPA Method 7E and 10 sampling systems at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. 

Tables 2.3.1 - 2.3.3 display the measured results for the VE readings performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The minimum, 

maximum, and maximum six-minute average opacity readings are displayed for each run. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Comoration - Hanley Plant 

EPA TEST METHODS UTILIZED 

MI/M2 M3 M4 M5 M9 M7E MIO M25 M26A 

(Flow) IDrv Mol. WL \ C'loHzO) (Filterable PM\ iVEs\ (NO,) iCOl iTGNMOs\ iHClandHF\ 

Run Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I 

Date No. Samplin~ Location Duration (min) Duratio~ (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) 

612412008 I Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 12:23-14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 

Duct - - - -

90 90 90 90 90 

6/24/2008 2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 15:45- 18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:45 18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:45- 18:53 

Duct - - - -

90 90 90 90 90 

612412008 3 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 

Duct - - - - 90 90 90 90 90 

6/24/2008 I Ceric Kiln Scrubber 12:23-14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23- 14:19 12:23-14:19 12:23- 13:23 10:31-11:49 10:31 -11:49 10:31- 11:49 12:23-14:19 

Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 

6/24/2008 2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber 15:45- 18:53 15:45-18:53 15:45-18:53 15:45- 18:53 15:15- 16:45 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 15:45- 18:53 

Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 

6/24/2008 3 Ceric Kiln Scrubber 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 19:48-21:33 18:10- 19:10 15:39- 16:59 15:39-16:59 15:39- 16:59 19:48-21:33 

Exhaust Stack 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 90 

AU times are Eastern Daylight Time. 

Table 2.1.1 -Sampling and Analytical Matrix 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page6 Air Compliance Testing, fnc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

EPA TEST METHODS UTILIZED 

Ml/M2 M3 M4 M8 

(Flow) _(Dry Mol- Wt) (%H20) (S02 and H2S04) 

Run Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I Sampling Time I 

Date No. Sampling Location Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) Duration (min) 

612512008 2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 10:31 - 11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 

Duct 60 60 60 60 

6/25/2008 3 eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28 - 14:44 

Duct 60 60 60 60 

6/25/2008 4 eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 

Duct 60 60 60 60 

6/25/2008 2 eerie Kiln Scrubber 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 10:31- 11:49 10:31-11:49 

Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 

6/25/2008 3 eerie Kiln Scrubber 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 13:28- 14:44 

Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 

612512008 4 eerie Kiln Scrubber 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39- 17:01 15:39-17:01 

Exhaust Stack 60 60 60 60 

All times are Eastern Daylight Time. 

Table 2.1.2 - Sampling and Analytical Matrix 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Slack Emission Test Report 

Test Dale: June 24 and 25, 2008 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Run 1 Run2 Run3 Average 

Product Throughput Rate (tonlhr 

Total Filterable Particulate Maller Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product -

Total Front-HalfParticulate Maner Mass Emissioo Rate (lblhr 3.38 3.40 5.05 3.94 

Total Froot-Half Particulate Maller Concentration (grainsfdscl) 0.023 0.024 0_035 OJJ27 

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (!b/ton-product) 

Hydrogen Chloride Scrubber Removal Efficiency (lbihr) 

Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (Jbihr) <0.268 < 0.178 < 0.255 < 0.233 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration (ppmvd) <2.76 < 1.87 <2.65 <2.43 

Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lbfton-product) - - -

Hydrogen Fluoride Scrubber Removal Efficiency (%) -

Hvdro en Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lbihr) 14.27 10.96 15.04 13.42 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration (ppmvd 269 209 285 254 

Maximum Six-Minute Average of Visible Emissions (%-opacity - Nitrol!en Oxides Mass Emission Rate (]b/ton-oroduct as NO - Nitrogen Oxides Mass Emission Rate !bthr as NO, -

Nitrogen Oxides Concentration (ppmvd 

Carbon Monoxide Mass Emission Rate (lblton-product -

Carllon Monoxide Mass Emission Rate (]b/hr 

Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppmvd 

VOC Mass Emission Rate (!b/ton-oroduct as propane) -

VQC Mass Emission Rate (]bfhr as ropane) 

TGNMO Mass Emission Rate (lblhr as carbon 

TG!'-<"MO Concentration (ppm-.-.J as carbon) -

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (acfrn) 30,739 30,481 30,647 30,622 

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (scfrn) 18,779 18,472 18,620 18,624 

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (dscfrn) 17,064 16,814 16,933 16,937 

Stack Gas Average Velocity (fpm 3,233 3,206 3,224 3,221 

Stack Gas Avera_ge Static Pressure (in-H 0 -0.11 -0.19 -0.18 -0.16 

Stack Gas Avera_ge Temperature ("F 374 377 376 376 

Stack Gas Percent by Volume Moisture ("/oH 0)*~ 9.13 8.98 9.06 9.06 

Measured Stack Inner Diameter in • 4Lh4L8 41.7;;41.8 41.7x41.8 4L7x4L8 

Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%C02 1.00 1.00 !.00 1.00 

Perc<:nt by Volume Qxvgen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%0 17.00 16.50 16.83 16.78 

Percent by Volume Nitro_gen in Stack Gas lDIY Basis) (%N,) 82.00 82.50 82.17 82.22 

The "<'" symbol in<!ica"" !hat <:00\pmlnd was not present in qus.ntities sbov<: !he Minimwn D>tee~ion Limit (MOL) of!.M analytical method for a\ leas! one """Flo treaioo. 

"Tho O:rie Kiln Scrubber h1!1;1 Dtl<;t :md Corie Kiln Scrubber E>:hsu<t Staok were cl!iptical in shape. 

••s.:. section 2.3 fer details 

Table 2.2.1- EPA Method 26A Emission Results 

Page a 

Glen-Gery Comorntion- Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Run l Run2 Run3 Average 

14.68 14.68 14.68 14.68 

0.116 0.132 0.155 0.135 

L70 1.95 2.28 1.97 

0.010 O.Oll 0.013 0.011 

< 0.0038 <0.0042 <0_0050 < 0.0043 

> 79.39 > 65.60 > 71.08 > 72.02 

<0.055 <0.061 <0.074 <0.063 

<0.480 <0.531 <0.627 < 0.546 

< 0.0082 < 0.0093 < 0.0103 <0.0092 

>99.16 > 98.76 >99.00 > 98.97 

<0.121 <0.136 <0.151 <0.136 

< !.91 <2.14 <2.34 <2.13 

6.46 4.58 5.00 5.35 

0.124 0.!27 0.130 0.127 

!.82 1.87 1.90 !.86 

12.58 12.81 12.83 12.74 

1.58 1.43 1.42 1.47 

23.14 20.94 20.85 2L65 

262 236 231 243 

<0.157 0_\77 <0.161 <0.165 

<2.310 2.602 <2.363 <2.425 

< L89 2.13 <1.94 < 1.99 

<50.0 56.0 <50.0 <52.0 

26,228 26,520 27,109 26,619 

22,972 23,151 23,640 23,254 

20,229 20,344 20,694 20,422 

4,311 4,359 4,456 4,376 

·1.03 -0.66 -0.82 -0.83 

!20 120 121 121 

11.94 12.13 12.46 12.18 

33.0 X 33.8 33.0 X 33.8 33.0 X 33.8 33.0x33.8 

1.00 !.00 1.00 1.00 

16.37 16.50 16.50 16.46 

82.63 82.50 82.50 82.54 

Afr Compliance Testing, Inc. - 000609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Run2 

Product Throughput Rate (ton/hr) -

S02 Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) -

S02 Scrubber Removal Efficiency(%) -

S02 Mass Emission Rate (lblhr) 42.77 

S02 Concentration (ppmvd) 261 

H2S04 Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) -

H2S04 Scrubber Removal Efficiency(%) -

H2S04 Mass Emission Rate (lblhr) 9.70 

H2S04 Concentration (ppmvd) 38.63 

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (acfm) 29,779 

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (scfin) 18,229 

Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (dscfin) 16,451 

Stack Gas Average Velocity (!pm) 3,132 

Stack Gas Average Static Pressure (in-H20) -0.23 

Stack Gas Average Temperature CF) 376 

Stack Gas Percent by Volume Moisture (%H20)** 9.76 

Measured Stack Inner Diameter (in)* 41.7x41.8 

Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%C02) 

Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%02) 

Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N2) 

*The Ceric Kiln Inlet Duct and Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack were elliptical in shape. 

**See section 2.3 for details 

0.00 

16.50 

83.50 

Run3 Run4 Average 

- - -

- - -

- - -

40.66 42.11 41.85 

238 249 249 

- - -

- - -

10.90 10.86 10.49 

41.75 41.97 40.78 

31,063 30,650 30,497 

18,939 18,730 18,633 

17,098 16,945 16,831 

3,267 3,224 3,208 

-0.22 -0.20 -0.22 

378 373 376 

9.72 9.53 9.67 

41.7 x41.8 41.7 X 41.8 41.7 x41.8 

0.00 0.00 0.00 

17.00 17.00 16.83 

83.00 83.00 83.17 

Table 2.2.2 - EPA Method 8 Emission Results 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page9 

Glen~Gery Corporation ~ Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Run2 Run3 Run4 Average 

14.68 14.68 14.68 14.68 

1.68 1.79 1.74 1.74 

42.31 35.48 39.22 39.01 

24.67 26.23 25.59 25.50 

121 126 124 124 

0.147 0.168 0.191 0.168 

77.81 77.38 74.25 76.48 

2.15 2.47 2.80 2.47 

6.87 7.71 8.89 7.82 

26,725 27,300 27,135 27,053 

23,454 23,937 23,658 23,683 

20,516 20,933 20,610 20,686 

4,393 4,487 4,460 4,447 

-1.00 -0.64 -0.96 -0.86 

122 122 123 122 

12.53 12.55 12.88 12.65 

33.0 X 33.8 33.0 x33.8 33.0 x33.8 33.0 X 33.8 

0.33 0.00 0.00 0.11 

16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 

83.67 84.00 84.00 83.89 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation · Hanley Plant 

"C 

> E 

c. 

c. 

-g 

E 

0.. 

0.. 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NOx Concentration 

40,---------------------------------------------------------, 

36 

32 

28 

24 

20 """"""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""" " """"""""""""""""""""""""" """ 

16 

12 

8 

4 

>--::":~===""""""""""~""";.;;"""="" ::.:;;:;=~~ L """""""""""""""""""""""""""~" 

0+--r~--~~~~~-r--,-,--r--,-,-~--.-,-~--r-~~--~ 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NOx Concentration 

40,--------------------------------------------------------, 

36 

32 

28 

24 

20 

16 

12 "" 

8 

4 

0+-~--,-~----~--.-~--.--,--,-~--.-~.-.---.--r--.--.--.-~ 

~~ #$$$~~~~,$~~,#~,,#,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NOx Concentration 

40,--------------------------------------------------------. 

36 

32 

28 

24 

20 

16 

12 

8 

4 

-----·-·--------··-··--- .~~~~~~ ~~----~ 

0+-~--,-~----~--.-~--.-~--,-~--.---.--r--.--r--.-~----~ 

"'~~L.~~~.~~~><.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vo v~ v~ v <:;Y ~y <:;Y ~y ~y ~· ~·v ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~y ~y ~y 

~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~####### 

Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 10 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. · 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

-g 

E 

0.. 

0.. 

-g 

E 

0.. 

0.. 

"C 

> 

E 

c. 

c. 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration 

300r:~~~~~~~~::==~::~::~~~::::~~~ ~~~ "'\r· .. ~·0 .... < -~ ~ ~ •. ., -• -.~ ~-~~ ~:7:'2: 

180 ... 

150 

120 

90 

60 .................... . 

30 

0+--r~--~-r~--~-r~~~-r--r-,-~--r-,-~--r-~~--~ 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration 

300,------------------------------------------------------------. 

224700 .. ········_;., .f. ... ~~ :~ .. r···'""''·"''· .. , .• , .. , .. 210 

180 

150 

120 

90 

60 

30 

.II. ,No/), .. IM ....... .A. ... .•• • ...... 1/V .. A. ····-" 

. ..... ." .... -.\': .. -.'........ .."1... " 

O+-~--~~--,--,--,-~--~~--~--.--r--.--r--.--r--~-r--~-4 

~~ ~$$$~~~~,,~$#~#####~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack CO Concentration 

300,---------------------------------------------------------. 

270 

240 

210 

180 

150 

120 . . . ........................... . 

90 ........................................................ . 

60 

30 

0+--r--~.-~--r--r~--~-r--r-,-~--r--r~--~~--r-~~ 

Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 11 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation ~ Hanley Plant 

Max 6 min avera e 6.46 

Minimum Readin 0 

Maximum ReadirlO- 10.00! 

Start Time 12:23 

End Time 13:23 

Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute avera es: 

Min. I 

0 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

1 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

2 5 5 0 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 

3 5 5 0 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 

4 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

5 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

6 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

7 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

6 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

9 5 5 5 0 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

10 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

11 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

12 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

13 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

14 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.21 5.21 

15 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 

16 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 

17 5 5 5 5 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 

18 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

19 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

20 5 10 5 5 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.58 

21 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

22 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

23 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

24 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

25 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

26 5 5 0 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 

27 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 

28 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

29 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

30 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

31 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

32 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

33 0 5 5 5 4.58 4.79 5.00 5.21 

34 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.42 5.42 5.42 

35 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.63 

36 5 5 5 0 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 

37 5 5 5 5 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 

38 5 5 5 5 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 

39 5 10 10 10 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 

40 5 5 5 5 5.63 5.83 6.04 6.04 

41 10 5 5 5 6.04 5.83 5.83 5.83 

42 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6,04 

43 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 

44 5 5 5 5 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 

45 5 10 10 5 6.25 6.46 6.25 6.04 

46 10 10 5 5 6.04 5.83 5.63 5.63 

47 5 5 5 10 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 

48 5 5 5 5 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.63 

49 5 5 5 5 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 

50 5 5 5 10 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.42 

51 10 5 5 5 5.21 5.00 5.00 5.00 

52 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

53 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

54 10 5 5 5 5.00 

55 5 5 5 5 

56 5 5 0 5 

57 5 5 5 5 

58 5 5 5 5 

59 5 

Table 2.3.1 M VIsible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 12 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. ~ 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Max 6 min avera e 4.58 

Minimum Readin 0 

Maximum Readin 5.00 

Start Time 15:45 

End Time 16:45 

Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute averages: I 

Min. 

0 5 5 5 5 3.13 3.13 3.13 2.92 

1 0 5 5 0 2.71 2.92 2.92 2.71 

2 5 0 5 5 2.92 2.71 2.92 2.71 

3 5 5 0 0 2.50 2.29 2.29 2.29 

4 0 5 0 5 2.50 2.50 2.29 2.50 

5 5 0 0 5 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.71 

6 5 5 0 0 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.92 

7 5 5 0 5 3.13 2.92 2.92 3.13 

8 0 5 0 0 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.33 

9 0 5 0 5 3.33 3.54 3.54 3.54 

10 0 0 5 5 3.54 3.75 3.75 3.75 

11 5 0 5 5 3.75 3.54 3.75 3.54 

12 5 5 5 5 3.54 3.54 3.54 3.54 

13 0 5 5 5 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 

14 0 5 5 0 3.33 3.54 3.54 3.54 

15 5 5 0 5 3.75 3.75 3.54 3.75 

16 5 0 5 5 3.75 3.75 3.96 3.96 

17 0 5 0 5 3.96 4.17 3.96 4.17 

18 5 5 5 0 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

19 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 

20 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.17 4.17 4.17 

21 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 

22 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 

23 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 3,96 

24 5 5 5 0 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.96 

25 5 5 5 5 4.17 3.96 3.96 3.96 

26 0 5 5 5 3.75 3.96 3.75 3.75 

27 5 5 5 5 3.75 3.54 3.54 3.54 

28 5 0 5 5 3.54 3.54 3.75 3.75 

29 0 5 0 5 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.96 

30 5 5 5 5 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.96 

31 0 5 5 0 3.96 4.17 4.17 3.96 

32 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 

33 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

34 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

35 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.58 

36 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 

37 5 5 0 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 

38 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

39 0 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

40 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

41 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.17 

42 5 0 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 

43 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 

44 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.17 

45 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 

46 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.17 4.17 

47 5 5 0 5 4.17 3.96 3.96 4.17 

48 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

49 0 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

50 5 5 0 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

51 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

52 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 

53 0 5 5 5 4J7 4.38 4.38 4.17 

54 5 5 5 5 4.17 

55 0 5 5 5 

56 5 5 0 5 

57 5 5 5 5 

58 0 5 5 5 

59 5 5 0 5 

Table 2.3.2 -Visible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 13 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emlss!on Test Report Glen.Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Maxs, i 

! ! 

i ~ s.oo I 

i 18:101 

Sec. 0 15 30 45 Six minute avera es; 

Min. 

0 5 5 0 5 3.96 3.96 3.96 4.17 

1 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

2 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

3 0 5 5 0 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.17 

4 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

5 5 0 5 5 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 

6 5 5 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 

7 5 0 5 5 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 

8 5 5 5 0 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

9 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 

10 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

11 0 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

12 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

13 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

14 5 5 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 

15 5 5 0 5 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 

16 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

17 0 5 5 0 4.58 4.79 4.58 4.58 

18 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

19 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

20 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

21 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

22 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 

23 5 0 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 

24 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

25 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

26 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

27 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

28 0 5 5 5 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 

29 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 

30 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

31 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

32 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

33 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

34 5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

35 0 5 5 5 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 

36 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

37 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.79 

38 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

39 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

40 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

41 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

42 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

43 5 5 0 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 

44 5 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 

45 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

46 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

47 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

48 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

49 5 5 5 5 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 

50 5 0 5 5 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 

5 5 5 0 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

52 5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

5 5 5 5 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 

5 5 5 5 4.79 

55 5 0 5 5 

56 5 5 5 5 

57 5 5 5 5 

58 5 5 5 5 

59 5 5 5 5 

Table 2.3.3- Visible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 14 Air Compliance Testing, Inc . . 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 

3.1 Process Description and Operation 

Glen-Gery Corporation manufactures a wide range of brick products. The Hanley, Pennsylvania facility 

operats the Ceric Kiln which has a permitted capacity of 16.00 ton/hr. Ceric Kiln was in operation during the 

performance of this test event. 

Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic. 

3.2 Control Equipment Description 

During this test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. 

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 

3 .3 .I Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 41.7-inches and 

41.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the horizontial plane and was accessed from a permanent platform 

arrangement. Two (2) 3.0-inch !.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that 

met EPA Method I, Section 1!.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verif'y 

the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 4.34° was measured. Therefore, the sampling 

location also met EPA Method I, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was 

traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, 

S02, H2S04, HCI and HF concentration determination. 

3.3 .2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of33.0-inches 

and 33.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a manlift. Two (2) 3.0-

inch I. D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method I, 

Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verif'y the absence of cyclonic 

flow. An average yaw angle of 4.67° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 

I, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow 

rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, S02, H2S04, HCI and HF concentration 

determination. The stack was also traversed for stack gas NOx and CO concentration determination. A 

single point located in an area of average velocity was utilized to determine the concentration ofTGMNOs. 

Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 15 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

3.4 Process Sampling Location 

The EPA Reference Test Methods performed did not specifically require that process samples were to be 

taken during the performance of this testing event. It is in the best knowledge of Air Compliance Testing that 

no process samples were obtained and therefore no process sampling location was identified in this report. 

See Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel for any process sampling locations which may have been 

utilized unknowingly to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. during this testing event. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 16 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

EPA Methods 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 

sampling 

8,and26A 

location ~ r / 

' 

Ceric Kiln 

/ " 

-·-----------·-·---' ----- ---' -----------------·---

------------------- -------------------

"-.. 

Wet Scrubber 

EPA Methods 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ?E, 8, 

9, 10, 25, and 26A 

sampling location 

Figure 3.1 - Ceric Kilu Process Schematic 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 17 

i!' 

~ 0. 

~ 

~ 

Fan 

Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

I 41.7"x41.8"1.D. 

' Q · r Elliptical Stack 

~ 364.5" 

8.72 Equivalent 

Diameters Upstream 

From Disturbance 

.,,9· 

/~ 0,; 

0 

431.0" 

10.31 Equivalent ~ Diameters Downstream i From Disturbance 

(2) 3.0" 

Sampling Ports 

Located goo 

Apart 

Point % of Duct Depth 

Distance From 

Inside Wall (in.) 

(Port 1) 

Distance From 

Inside Wall (in.) 

(Port 2) ~ ~<-

~' ',' '\ 1 4.4 1.8 1.8 

2 14.6 6.1 6.1 

3 29.6 12.4 12.3 

4 70.4 29.4 29.6 

5 85.4 35.7 35.6 

' 

~ "' 

Q,o<::- ' ~ 6 95.6 40.0 I 39.9 ----

~ '} 

~· 

«o<::-

Figure 3.2 - Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct Traverse Point Location Drawing 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 18 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

1 

0 ::J 

1 

-r 

300" 

8.88 Equivalent Diameters 

Upstream from Disturbance Port 1 

(2) 3.0" I. D. 

- +- Sampling Ports 

Located 90' Apart 

72" 

2.13 Equivalent Diameters 

Downstream from 

Disturbance 

Point 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

\_ 33.8" X 33.0" I. D. 

9 

10 

Elliptical Stack 11 

12 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

f------33.8" I.D.------'>1 

w 

8.5" 

3 5 

2 4 6 

8 

7 

Port 2 

Distance From 

Inside Wall (in.) 

% of Duct Depth Port 1 

2.1 1.0 

6.7 2.3 

11.8 4.0 

17.7 6.0 

25.0 8.5 

35.6 12.0 

64.4 21.8 

75.0 25.4 

82.3 27.8 

88.2 29.8 

93.3 31.5 

97.9 32.8 

9 

10 12 g 

b 

11 ..; 

"' 

Distance From 

Inside Wall (in.) 

Port 2 

1.0 

2.2 

3.9 

5.8 

8.3 

11.7 

21.3 

24.8 

27.2 

29.1 

30.8 

32.0 

Figure 3.3 - Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 19 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

4.1 Test Methods 

4.1.1 EPA Method I: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source 

Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate 

from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is 

selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then 

located within each of these equal areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures 

outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) 

Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of 

the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe or reverse type) pi tot tube. This method was utilized in 

its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight 

Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (I) single-point, grab 

sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is 

analyzed for percent C02, percent 0 2, and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight 

determination a Pyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per 

the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 

Principle: A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample 

stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per 

the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Front-Half PM only) 

Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber 

filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ± l4°C (248 ± 25°F) or such other temperature as 

specified by an applicable subpart ofthe standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at 

or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This 

method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.6 EPA Method 7E: Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental 

Analyzer Procedure) (Concentrations assumed less than 2,000ppm) 

Principle: A sample is continuously extracted from the effluent stream; a portion of the sample stream is 

conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination ofNOx concentration. 

Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure reliable data. This method was utilized 

in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 20 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

4.1.7 EPA Method 8: Detennination of Sulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary 

Sources 

Principle: A gas sample is extracted isokinetically from the stack. The sulfuric acid mist (including sulfur 

trioxide) and the sulfur dioxide are separated, and both fractions are measured separately by the barium-thorin 

titration method. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, 

Appendix A. 

4.1.8 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources 

Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is detennined visually by a qualified observer. 

This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.9 EPA Method I 0: Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Concentrations assumed less than I 0,000 ppm) 

Principle: An integrated or continuous gas sample is extracted from a sampling point and analyzed for carbon 

monoxide (CO) content using a Luft-type nondispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) or equivalent. This method 

was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.1 0 EPA Method 25: Determination of Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon 

(assumed concentration of organics will be less than I ,000,000 ppm as carbon, and that there will be no 

chlorinated organic compounds in the stack gas) 

Principle: An emission sample is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate through a heated filter and a 

chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are 

determined by independently analyzing the condensate trap and sample tank fractions and combining the 

analytical results. The organic content of the condensate trap fraction is determined by oxidizing the NMO to 

C02 and quantitatively collecting it in the effluent in an evacuated vessel; then a portion of the C02 is reduced 

to CH4 and measured by an FID. The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a 

portion of the sample into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from carbon monoxide (CO), 

C02, and CH4; the NMO are oxidized to C02, reduced to CH4, and measured by an FID. In this manner, the 

variable response of the FID associated with different types of organics is eliminated. This method was 

utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.11 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary 

Sources-Isokinetic Method 

Principle: This method is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride 

(HCI), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X2) [chlorine (Ciz) and bromine 

(Br2)] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore 

particularly suited for sampling at sources, such as those controlled by wet scrubbers, emitting acid particulate 

matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the 

procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

The sampling trains utilized during this testing project are depicted in Figures 4.1 - 4.4. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 21 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 

Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel utilizing their typical record 

keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the 

conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 and in the Appendix. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 22 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

THERMOCOUPLE HEATED 

C) CMt f 7 ,-PROBEr+--+----v ~ IMPINGER TRAIN 

THERMOCOUPLE 

FILTER 

HOLDER WITH ABSORBING SOLUTIONS 

C) -

GLASS 

PROBE TIP 

\PITOTTUBE 

THERMOCOUPLE 

STACK 

HEATED 

GLASS 

LINED 

~t : 'I ~ REVERSE 

TYPE PITOT 

TUBE 

PITOT 

MANOMETER 

THERMOMETER 

100m! 100m! 

0.1N 0.1N 

H,so, H,so, 

(standard {standard 

tip) 

ORIFICE 

empty 

(modified/ 

no tip) 

~ GAS EXIT~ I I I I \7 I VI 

MANOMETER 

Silica Gel 

200-300g 

(modified/ 

no tip) 

THERMOCOUPLE 

CHECK 

VALVE 

VACUUM 

BY-PASS 

VALVE (FINE 

0 

LINE --------.. 

GAUGE 

VALVE 

(COARSE ADJUST) 

AIRTIGHT 

VACUUM PUMP 

Figure 4.1 -EPA Method 5 and 26A Sampling Train Schematic 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 23 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

TEMPERATURE 

SENSOR 

------~;;c; :J-PROBE 

'ITOTTUBE 

TEMPERATURE 

SENSOR 

TYPE PITOT 

TUBE 

STACK 

WALL 

MANOMETER 

MANOMETER 

HEATED 

AREA 

ORIFICE 

~ 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL MAY BE REPLACED BY AN 

/THERMOMETER 

100 miiPA 

(std. tip) H,Q, 

(mod. tip) 

THERMOMETERS 

.. .. 

EQUIVALENT CONDENSER 

H,o, 

(std. tip) 

BY-PASS 

0 

-

MAIN 

VALVE 

AIRTIGHT 

PUMP 

VACUUM 

LINE 

/ 

Figure 4.2 - EPA Method 8 Sampling Train Schematic 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 24 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

STACK WALL 

HEATED CALIBRATION 

VALVE 

HEATED 

SAMPLE LINE 

SAMPLE BY-PASS 

VENT 

Glen-Gerv Corooration - Hanley Plant 

CALIBRATION GAS BY-PASS FLOW 

CONTROL VALVE 

HEATED 

PROBE 

IN-STACK 

FILTER or 

OUT-OFSTACK 

HEATED 

FILTER 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 

MOISTURE 

REMOVAL 

SYSTEM 

PUMP 

SAMPLE 

co ~ ANALYZER 

\ Ai 

FLOW CONTROL VALVE 

SAMPLE GAS f-1--1~ 

MANIFOLD 

NOx 

ANALYZER 

ANALYZER 

FLOW CONTROL VALVE FLOW CONTROL VALVE 

Figure 4.3 -EPA Method 7E and 10 Sampling Train Schematic 

Page 25 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

,-

THERMOCOUPLES 

'--

fl ~ Cl 

,---, \ I I 

STAINLESS STEEL 

PROBE 

L_ 

STACK WALL 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 

I DUAL RANGE I I I I I I 

ROTAMETER 

VACUUM 

PUMP 

I 

Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

MANOMETER 

+-

FLOW I 

CONTROL 

I \._....> 

VALVE I 

IS ® ~ PURGE VALVE 

1/ THERMOCOUPLE SAMPLE 

TANK 

VALVE 

I 

1--

SAMPLE / 

VALVE 

.An 

'<.../ 

I STAINLESS 

STEEL 

FILTER 

HOLDER 

HEATED BOX 

:· D 

1°

0 

DRYICE 

0 

ROTAMETER 

~ 

f:ONDENSATE 

TRAP 

SAMPLE 

TANK 

Figure 4.4 - EPA Method 25 Sampling Train Schematic 

Page 26 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 

5.1 QA Audits 

Tables 5.1.1 -5.9 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. 

All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their 

respective methods as is shown in Tables 5 .1.1 - 5 .2.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below 

the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. 

Tables 5.3 and 5.4 illustrate the nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide calibration audits which were 

performed during this test (and integral to performing EPA Method 7E, and 10 correctly) were all within the 

Measurement System Performance Specifications of ±3% of span for the Zero and Calibration Drift Checks, 

±5% of span for the System Calibration Bias Checks, and ±2% of span for the Calibration Error Checks. 

Table 5.5 displays the N02 to NO converter efficiency check. The converter efficiency check was conducted 

as per the procedures contained in EPA Method 7E, Section 8.2.4 which requires a conversion of at least 90%. 

As shown an average converter efficiency of97.34% was achieved for the NOx analyzer utilized at the Ceric 

Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. 

Table 5.6 displays the EPA Method 25 train leak check audit results which were performed prior to each 

TGNMO concentration run. 

Table 5.7 displays the HCI and HF collection efficiency. The collection efficiency was determined in 

accordance with the Source Testing Manual (Revision 3.3), Section 2.8 which requires a collection efficiency 

of2: 95%. As shown all the collection efficiencies ofHCI and HF at both test locations were above the limit. 

Table 5.8 displays the results of the EPA Method 8 Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted byemail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. On July 15,2008, Mr. 

Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA 

Method 8, Section 11.4.3 criteria. 

Table 5.9 displays the results of the EPA Method 26A Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted by 

e-mail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. On July 14, 2008, Mr. 

Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA 

Method 26A, Section 11.5.3 criteria. 

Observer Charles Giffels was certified on April 2, 2008 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The expiration date 

is six months from the issue date. 

For quality assurance, the observers obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting 

background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. Readings were taken eve1y 15 seconds 

and made to the nearest 5% opacity. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 27 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

5.2 QAIQC Problems 

No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 28 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Method 5 and 26A Sampling Train Run I Run2 Run3 

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) ( cfin' 0.002 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 0.003 I 0.001 

Applicable Merbod Allowable Leak Rate ( cfm \ < 0.020 < 0.020 <0.020 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 

Recorrunended Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 50.000 50.000 50.000 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Percent of Isokinetic Sampling Rate (% 98.7 101.8 101.1 

Applicable Merbod Allowable Isokinetic Samplina Rate (% 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Method 5 and 26A Sampling Train Run I Run2 Run3 

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) ( cfm 0.003 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 0.001 I 0.001 

Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm' < 0.020 <0.020 < 0.020 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 59.262 58.661 62.859 

Recorrunended Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 50.000 50.000 50.000 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Percent oflsokinetic Sampling Rate (% 100.6 95.9 99.0 

Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate(%' 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Table 5.1.1 -EPA Method 5 and 26A Sample Train Audit Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 29 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Method 8 Sampling Train Run2 Run3 Run4 

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) ( cfm' 0.002/ 0.002 0.002 I 0.000 0.001/0.001 

Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate ( cfm <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Volume ofDrv Gas Collected (dscf) 37.241 38.137 37.860 

Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 36.000 36.000 36.000 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Percent of !so kinetic Sampling Rate(%' 102.7 102.0 101.4 

Applicable Method Allowable lsokinetic Sampling Rate(%' 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Method 8 Sampling Train Run2 Run3 Run4 

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) ( cfm 0.001/0.001 0.002/ 0.00 I 0.001/0.000 

Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate ( cfm' <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 39.553 40.319 40.0ll 

Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected ( dscf) 36.000 36.000 36.000 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Percent oflsokinetic Samplin,a Rate(% 94.3 99.2 94.9 

Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (% 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 + 10 

Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

Table 5.1.2- EPA Method 8 Sample Train Audit Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 30 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Post Test Dry Gas 

Meter Calibration 

Average Post-Test Check Value 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre 

Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method 

Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference 

(Y) (Yqa) (%) (%) Acceptable 

0.9988 1.0151 1.63% 5.00% Yes 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Post Test Dry Gas 

Meter Calibration 

Average Post-Test Check Value 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre 

Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method 

Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference 

(Y) (Yqa) (%) (%) Acceptable 

0.9994 1.0424 4.31% 5.00% ' Yes 

Table 5.2.1 -EPA Method 5 and 26A Dry Gas Meter Audit Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 31 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Post Test Dry Gas 

Meter Calibration 

Average Post-Test Check Value 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre 

Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method 

Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference 

IV) (Yaa) (%) (%) Acceptable 

0.9988 1.0162 1.74% . 5.00% Yes 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Post Test Dry Gas 

Meter Calibration 

Average Post-Test Check Value 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Dry Gas Meter Difference From Pre 

Meter Calibration Calibration Check Test Calibration Applicable Method 

Factor Value Factor Allowable Difference 

(Y) (Yqa) (%) (%) Acceptable 

0.9994 1.0349 3.56% 5.00% Yes .•.............. ---------- ------ ---------------- --

Table 5.2.2 - EPA Method 8 Dry Gas Meter Audit Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 32 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Nitrogen Oxide Analyzer Run 1 Acceptable Run2 Acceptable Run3 Acceptable 

Analyzer Span During Test Run (ppm' 50 YES 50 YES 50 YES 

Initial System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.1 N/A 0.8 N/A 0.6 N/A 

Final System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.8 N/A 0.6 N/A 0.9 N/A 

Actual Concentration of the Upscale Calibration Gas (ppm 23.1 N/A 23.1 N/A 23.1 N/A 

Initial System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm' 22.3 N/A 22.6 N/A 23.1 N/A 

Final System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm' 22.6 N/A 23.1 N/A 22.8 N/A 

Initial System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas(% of Span 0.32 YES 1.80 YES 1.40 YES 

Final System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% of Span 1.80 YES 1.40 YES 2.00 YES 

Initial System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas(% of Span -1.60 YES -1.00 YES 0.00 YES 

Final System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% of Span -1.00 YES 0.00 YES -0.60 YES 

System Drift for Zero Gas (% of Span' 1.48 YES -0.40 YES 0.60 YES 

System Drift for Upscale Gas (% of Span' 0.60 YES 1.00 YES -0.60 YES 

Analyzer Calibration Error for Zero Gas (% of Span -0.20 YES -0.20 YES -0.20 YES 

Analyzer Calibration Error for Mid-Level Gas (% of Span 0.04 YES 0.04 YES 0.04 YES 

Analy>;erCalibrationError for High-Level Gas (% of Span) -0.10 YES -0.10 YES -0.10 YES 

Table 5-3 - EPA Method 7E Analyzer Calibration and QA Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 33 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrnbber Exhanst Stack 

Carbon Monoxide Analyzer Run 1 Acceptable Run2 Acceptable Rnn3 Acceptable 

Analyzer Span During Test Run (ppm 615 YES 615 YES 615 YES 

Initial System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm -0.10 N/A 0.10 N/A -0.60 N/A 

Final System Calibration Response for Zero Gas (ppm 0.10 N/A -0.60 N/A -0.02 N/A 

Actual Concentration of the Upscale Calibration Gas (ppm 311 NIA 311 N/A 311 N/A 

Initial System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm 310 N/A 306 N/A 307 N/A 

Final System Calibration Response for Upscale Gas (ppm) 306 N/A 307 N/A 308 N/A 

Initial System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% of Span 0.02 YES 0.05 YES -0.07 YES 

Final System Calibration Bias for Zero Gas (% of Span 0.05 YES -0.07 YES O.o3 YES 

Initial System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% of Span -0.72 YES -1.24 YES -1.20 YES 

Final System Calibration Bias for Upscale Gas (% of Span) -1.24 YES -1.20 YES -1.01 YES 

System Drift for Zero Gas (% of Span O.o3 YES -0.11 YES 0.09 YES 

System Drift for Upscale Gas (% of Span) -0.52 YES O.o3 YES 0.20 YES 

Analyzer Calibration Error for Zero Gas (% of Span -0.03 YES -0.03 YES -0.03 YES 

Analyzer Calibration Error for Mid-Level Gas (% of Span 0.52 YES 0.52 YES 0.52 YES 

Analyzer Calibration Error for High-Level Gas (% of Span) 0.78 YES 0.78 YES 0.78 YES 

Table 5.4- EPA Method 10 Analyzer Calibration and QA Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 34 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

Certified Cylinder NOx Concentration (ppm) 

Maximum Analyzer Concentration (ppm as N02) 

Final Analyzer Concentration (ppm as N02) 

Analyzer Concentration Percent Decrease From Maximum (% 

Applicable Method Allowable Decrease (% 

Acceptable Per Applicable Metbod (Yes!No 

Analyzer Serial Number: 

Cylinder Number: 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

22.92 

19.86 

19.85 

0.031 

<2.0 

Yes 

115 

CC927233 

Table 5.5 - NOx Converter Efficiency Check 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 35 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrnbber Exhanst Stack 

Pressure Loss Applicable Method Acceptable per 

Observed Allowable Pressure Applicable 

EPA M25 Sampling (Pretest) Loss Method 

Train (mm-Hg) (mm-Hg) (Yes I No) 

Run l 7.00 91.00 Yes 

Run2 18.00 91.00 Yes 

L..... Run3 18.00 ' 

91.00 _ Yes 

Table 5.6 -EPA Method 25 Leak Check Audit Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 36 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation • Hanley Plant 

eerie Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

Total Mass ofHCl in Mass of HCl in Last HCL Collection 

EPA M26A Sample Impinger Efficiency 

Sampling Train (mg) (mg) (%) 

Run 1 <6.60 0.08 98.79 

Run2 <4.50 <0.13 100 

Run3 < 6.43 < 0.14 100 

eerie Kiln Scrnbber Inlet Dnct 

Total Mass of HF in Mass of HF in Last HF Collection 

EPAM26A Sample Impinger Efficiency 

Sampling Train (mg) (mg) (%) 

Run 1 352.17 10.60 96.99 

Run2 276.52 5.51 98.01 

Run3 380.14 7.41 98.05 

eerie Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Total Mass ofHCI in Mass of HCI in Last HCL Collection 

EPA M26A Sample Impinger Efficiency 

Sampling Train (mg) (mg) (%) 

Run 1 < 1.22 <0.16 100 

Run2 < 1.34 < 0.11 100 

Run3 < 1.69 < 0.14 100 

eerie Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

Total Mass of HF in Mass of HF in Last HF Collection 

EPAM26A Sample Impinger Efficiency 

Sampling Train (mg) (mg) (%) 

Run 1 <2.67 <0.16 100 

Run2 <2.96 < 0.11 100 

Run3 < 3.46 <0.14 100 

The"<" symbol indicates that compound was not present in quantities above the Minimum Detection Limit 

(MDL) of the analytical method for at least one sample fraction. 

Table 5.7- EPA Method 26A Collection Efficiency Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 37 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. · 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

MOS-3756-0lb/H- 0895 MOS-3756-0la/G - 0523 

EPA Audit Sample 1-D- (H2S04) (S02) 

Reported Concentration (mg/dscm) 81.70 393.20 

Table 5.8- EPA Method 8 Audit Results 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 38 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

EPA Audit Sample I.D. M26A- 3756-03/L-2728 M26A- 3756-04/L-2752 

Reported Concentration as Cl (mg/L) 7.47 7.47 

Table 5.9- EPA Method 26A Audit Results 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 39 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

6.0 APPENDIX 

Appendix attached. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 40 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
APPENDIX 

to 

Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

Determination of Total Filterable Particulate 

Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, 

Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total 

Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric 

Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible 

Emissions 

Ceric Kiln 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Summerville, Pennsylvania 

Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 

Job Number: 080609 

Prepared by: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

PO Box41156 

Cleveland OH 44141 ~0156 

Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

Report Date: July 3!, 2008 
Appendix Contents 

PROCESS AND CONTRACTED LAB DATA 

Process Operational Data- All (PRINT) 

Contracted Lab Analytical Results -All 

Record of Custody Sheets - Contracted 

FIELD AND INTERNAL LAB DATA 

-

Excel Test Data Tabs (PRINT) 

Excel Method Specific Tab (PRINT) 

Excel Run Data Tab (PRINT) 

Example Calculation (PRINT) 

flr 

Pr 

I+ 

ft 

A 

A 

!+ 

A 

ft 

A 

A 

p, 

10 

13 

Record of Custody Sheets - In House 

Test Log (CEMS Methods) 

Main Method Field Data Sheets 

I? I sokinetic Field Data Sheets 

1::1 

{3 

e, 

B 

8 

-.8 

10 

13 

U3 

i3 

ACT Laboratory Analysis (titrations) 

Gravimetric Analysis (Method 5, 17, and 202) 

Acetone/Inorganic/Organic Residuals Calc. 

EPA Method 9 Field Data 

EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery 

EPA Method 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data 

EPA Method 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation 

EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets 

EPA Method 1 Cyclonic Flow 

EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data 

EPA Method 1 Criteria 

(REAP EAT THIS SECTION FOR EACH STACK) 

ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS 

[l]Analyzer Calibration Error 

[X]Analyzer System Bias and System Drift 

EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS I CALl BRA TIONS 

Probe Nozzle Inspections -All (lsokinetic Methods) 

Pre-Test Pilot Tube I Probe Inspections- All 

EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS I HISTORY 

Micromanometer Certificate (when utilized) 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration History 

Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History OPG, -oo;z. 

Acetone Residuals History loA {( -<>o 1 

Calibration Gas Certifications 

ot Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification 

x Reference Meter Calibration 

i Q Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration 

Lake Balance (Method 4 and AL T -008) 

Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetries) 

VE Azimuth Tables 

VE Declination 

VE Certificates 

Intent to Test Notification (Compliance Only) (PRINT) 

AT-MTB- o/3 

Gamma -o.:,.'1~2r::;.~S::;--

DeiH ;>.,ot(;, 

Date f5/:z.!i5/p6 

T-PRB- _,67:1'7<> __ 

T -PRB - _,6'-'t-'-/ __ T-PRB- ___ _ 

T-PITT-PITT-PITBAL- ::...oo::...f,__ __ 

BALB T-MTB- ot6 

Gamma -'o'+. 11'3:?"""24.,.,.---

Del H /, 7-15 

Date 5/:w/o2 

T-PRB- _,6,::::o-fx __ 

T -PRB - -"G"'v..~~.8" __ 

CT-MTB- __ _ 

Gamma 

DeiH ----

Date 

T-PRB- __ _ 

T-PRBT-PRBT-PITT-PITT-PITBALBAL-

----

----

D T-MTB- ----

Gamma----

DeiH 

Date 

T-PRB- __ _ 

T-PRB- ___ _ ;

10-Minute Cals -All 

Post-Test Pilot Tube I Probe Insp.- All (Compliance Only) T-PRB- ___ _ T-PRB- ___ _ 

[]]Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit 

[Z]Post-Test Thermocouple Check (Compliance Only) 

Pre-Test Meter Box Leak Check 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter I Orifice Calibration 

Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration 

T-PITT-PITT-PITBAL - ...::o...::o-"6:___ 

BAL-

§

Post-Test Dry Gas Meter I Orifice Calibration 

Post-Test Meter Console Calibration 

*Post Test Calibrations Required for all Mini Meter Boxes and when Yqa does not pass. 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. -appendix checklists.xls-Appendix Checklist 

T-PITT-PITT-PITBALBAL-
Location Test Date *Rate 

Cars/Day 

KilniD113 6/24/2008 29 

KilniD113 6/25/2008 29 

Wet Scrubber CAM Data 

Date Time pH Setpoint 

6/24/2008 10:00 AM 6.0 

4:00PM 6.0 

6/25/2008 10:00 AM 6.0 

4:00PM 6.0 

Fan speed during test: 75% (45.5 Hz) 

Operating Limits: 

pH: 4.3- 6.9 pH Units 

Flow Rate: 230 - 500 GPM 

Pieces 

Per Car 

5,400 

5,400 

pH 

6.02 

6.04 

6 

5.99 

Hanley Plant 

Stack Test Process Data 

June 24. 25. , 2008 

Weight Per Throughput 

Piece (lbs) (Tons/Hr) 

4.5 14.68 

4.5 14.68 

Flow (GPM) 

377.86 

386.96 

382.26 

379.96 

Product 

Type 

Extruded 

Extruded 

Hanley Process Data June 24, 25 2008 Stack test fina!.xls 

Size **Raw Product 

Material Name 

Standard 100% Clay S32 Blend 

Standard 100% Clay S32 Blend 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS 

EPA Method-25 Laboratory Report 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C. G. Simon 

' 

Case Narrative: Authorized Signature: ~~ 7/~g 

This laboratory report is presented in 9 parts. The Introduction is followed by a Summary of Am!tlytical Results, Sample Volumetric Data, 

Method 25 Analyzer Daily Calibration Data, Sample Analysis Data, Sample Chain of Custody, Method 25 Calculations, 

Initial Method 25 Sample Recovery System Performance data, and Method 25 Calibration Gas Certificates of Analysis. 

The following notes apply to this test series. 

1.) Samples were received on July 2, 2008. All tanks and traps were sealed and in good condition. All traps were on dry ice. 

2.) Lab tank pressure/temperatures matched field values within I. 6%. Field measurements were used in all calculations. 

3.) All traps were recovered at 300°C, then cleaned at 600°C. 

4.) All sample trap purges were stopped when the trap effluent contained <6 ppm C02 at a flow rate of-100 mllmin. 

5.) All trap recoveries were stopped when the oxidation catalyst effluent contained <10 ppm C02 at a flow rate of -100 ml/min. 

6.) The Method-25 Sample Recovery System catalyst efficiency was measured as 100.03% prior to sample extraction. 

7.) No EPA M25 Audit samples were submitted with this set of samples. 

8) Example calculations for one sample are presented on the following page. 

7/3/2008 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891. 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS 

Example~~Iculations for sample: M250837-609-1 

Sample Volume Noncondensable Organics 

Vs = (0.3857) (V) [(Pt /Tt)- (Pti/Tti)] C t={ (Ptf7Ttf)/[(Pt/t)-(Pti/Tti)]} { (l/3)(X1+ X2+ X3)/DRFNMo} 

Where V= sample tank volume = 0. 006113 m3 I Where 

Pt =sample tank pressure after sampling= 581.0 mm Hg Ptf= final sample tank pressure= 

Tt =sample tank temperature after sampling= 298.2 K Ttf = final sample tank temp. = 

Pti =sample tank pressure before sampling= 5.0 mm Hg Pt =sample tank pres. after sampling= 

Tt = sample tank temperature before sampling= 294.8 K Tt = sample tank temp. after sampling = 

Vs =sample volume= 0.004555 m3 Pt =sample tank pres. before sampling= 

Condensable Organics, Cc Note that Cc is defined by Method 25 at 11.2.2 Tti=sample tank temp. before sampling= 

as the sum of C02 and any NMO measured in the ICV. X1 = 1st GC response, NMO in tank = 

{[(0.3857)(Vv)(Pf)]/[(Vs)(Tf)]}{[l/3] [(Xt+X2+X3)/DRFc02 +(Y1+Y2+Y3)/DRF1

•

1

Mo)]} X2 = 2nd GC response, NMO in tank= 

Where: I x3 = 3rd GC response, NMO in tank= 

Vv = ICV volume = 

Pf= ICV final pressure= 

0.003174 m3 

1,175 mmHg 

'DRFNMO = NMO response factor= 

Ct = noncondensable VOC = 

1169.8 mmHg 

300.2 K 

581.0 mmHg 

298.2 K 

5.0 mmHg 

294.8 K 

9.57 area units 

9. 86 area units 

10.88 area units 

area 

l. 0194 units/ppmC 

20.0 ppmC 

Vs= sample volume= 

Tf= final rCV temp.= 

0.004555 m3 

301.5 K TGMlfO Mass Concentration 

X1,

2,3 = GC responses for C02 in the rev= 

DRF coz = C02 response factor = 

Y 1,2,3 = GC responses for NMO in the ICV 

DRFNMo = NMO Response factor= 

Cc = condensable VOC = 

16.77 15.66 

1.0038 area counts/ppmC 

1.27 1.29 

1. 0194 area counts/ppmC 

18.3 ppmC 

16.45 

1.31 

Where 

~c = 0.4993 (Ct+Cc) = C Where: 

Ct = noncondensable VOC= 20.0 ppmC 

Cc =condensable VOC = 

C = total VOC mass cone. ' 

18.3 ppmC 

19.1 mgC/m3 

7/3/2008 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891. 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS RESULTS 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Simon 

Listed results are not blank-corrected. PAL M25 field blanks average 10±5 ppmC - .. 

SAMPLE TRAPS RECOVERED AT 300°C. TGNMO concentrations as ppmC in the sample gas 

Ct Cc 

*C02 co CH4 Non-condensable Condensable 

Sample Run and ID ppm ppm ppm @ -78°C, ppmC @ -78°C, ppmC 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust 

M250837-609-l 18,213 219 89 20 18 

M250837-609-1 24,475 259 106 23 34 

M25083 7-609-1 21,820 238 98 23 21 

*C02 concentrations in the sample tanks may not be directly comparable due to a potential interference of up to 

-11,000 ppm from the dry ice used to store and process the samples. This does not affect the VOC results. 

c 

Total VOC 

ppmC 

38 

56 

44 

7/3/2008 PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, FL. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 

Me 

Total VOC 

mgC/dscm 

19.1 

28.1 

21.9 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 SAMPLE DATA 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: Jnly 2, 2008, by C. G. Simon 

I Lab Lab %vol 

Vs Analysis final final diff 

Vand Pti Pt Ttf and 1 Sample Analysis Volume tank tank from 

Vv nnn Tti nnn Tt Ptf and Pf Tf Volume Volume Sample pres temp field 

SampleiD Vessel ml Hg OF K Hg OF K psia nnnHg OF K ml ml Volume mbar OF value 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust 

M250837 -609-l Tank-108 6,113 5.0 71 295 581 77 298 22.62 1170 81 300 4,555 9,188 2.017 778 81 -0.3% 

I 

I 

I 

trap-1018 ICV-147 3,174 I 22.72 1175 83 301 4,555 4,771 1.048 

I 

I 

I I 

I I I I I I 

296 I 22.68 I M250837 -609-l Tank-132 6,121 4.0 71 295 533 74 1173 80 300 1 4,212 I 9,231 2.191 731 81 1.6% 

I I I 

' I I 

trap-1082 ICV-148 3,176 1 22.40 1158 83 302 4,212 4,704 1.117 

I 

I I I I I 

I I 

M250837-609-l Tank-177 6,087 3.0 76 298 620 64 291 22.72 1175 82 I 301 4,980 9,171 1.842 857 80 0.6% 

I 

I 

trap-1095 tiCV-149 3,171 22.54 11166 83 I 302 I 4,980 4,726 0.949 I 

I 

713/2008 PAL, Inc.: 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD 25 ANALYZER CALIBRATION 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C. G. Simon 

Response Response Response Mean RFNormal 

Calibration Cal gas Analyzer x1Normal x2Normal x3Normal Response X Area 

Gas cone. ppmC Area Area Area Normal Area Counts/ % Average 

Species ppmC range Counts Counts Counts Counts ppmC RSD RF 

A-- C02 50.1 100 51.38 51.65 50.10 51.05 1.0189 1.62 ---'-- ---

B -- C02 50.1 100 49.61 49.89 49.11 49.53 0.9887 0.80 1.0038 -·-

B--C02 9,933 20,000 10,050 10,047 9,971 10,023 1.0090 0.45 

C -- C02 9,933 20,000 9,999 9,976 9,965 9,980 1.0047 0.18 1.0069 

A--NMO 60.30 100 60.03 60.27 60.60 60.30 1.0000 0.48 

A--NMO 59.73 100 59.74 59.53 59.92 59.73 1.0000 0.32 -

B--NMO 59.73 100 62.26 61.49 62.41 62.1 1.0389 0.79 1.0194 

A-- CH4 48.98 100 48.88 49.07 48.99 48.98 1.0000 019_ 

B -- CH4 48.98 100 49.09 48.92 49.06 49.02 1.0009 018 1.0004 

A--CO 51.03 100 50.16 51.04 51.89 51.03 1.0000 1.70 -

B--CO 51.03 100 52.02 51.49 50.84 51.45 1.0082 1.15 1.0041 

7/3/2008, PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABS, INC. US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS DATA 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C. G. Simon ----

Ctm & Display RF 

Ccm, Range Normal TGNMO ppmC Ctmj and Ccmk Mean (for Area ppm in ppmC, 

Analyzer Responses in normal reference Cali b. counts Sample Ct & 

SampleiD Vessel Species normalized area counts counts only) factors /ppmC Gas Cc 

M250837-609-1 Tank-108 C02 9,123 9,039 9,111 9,091 20,000 B,C 1.0069 18,213 

C, NMO 

AV/SV= 2.017 as C 9.6 9.9 10.9 10.1 100 A,B 1.0194 20.0 20.0 

CH4 43.92 44.62 44.03 44.2 100 A,B 1.0004 89.1 -

co 107.7 110.9 108.5 109.0 200 A,B 1.0041 219.1 -

c" voc 

trap-1018 ICV-147 as C02 16.8 15.7 16.4 16.3 50 A,B 1.0038 17.0 

AV/SV= 1.048 NMO 1.27 1.29 1.31 1.3 50 A,B 1.0194 1.3 18.3 

M250837-609-1 Tank-132 C02 11,219 11,247 11,271 11,246 20,000 B,C 1.0069 24,475 --

C, NMO 

AV/SV= 2.191 as C 10.9 10.7 10.1 10.5 100 A,B 1.0194 22.7 22.7 

-

CH4 48.90 48.46 48.36 48.6 100 A,B 1.0004 106.4 -

co 118.2 118.1 119.2 118.5 200 A,B 1.0041 258.7 --

Cc, VOC 

trap-1082 ICV-148 as C02 29.1 30.2 29.4 29.6 50 A,B 1.0038 32.9 . 

AV/SV= 1.117 NMO 0.60 0.59 0.62 0.6 50 A,B 1.0194 0.7 33.6 

M250837-609-1 Tank-177 C02 11,987 11,955 11,850 11,931 20,000 B,C 1.0069 21,820 

C, NMO 

AV/SV= 1.842 as C 13.2 12.5 12.1 12.6 100 A,B 1.0194 22.8 22.8 

CR. 53.27 53.28 53.37 53.3 100 A,B 1.0004 98.1 

co 129.5 129.9 130.3 129.9 200 A,B 1.0041 238.2 --

c" voc 

trap-1095 ICV-149 as C02 20.9 21.1 21.9 21.3 so A,B 1.0038 20.1 

AV/SV= 0.949 NMO 0.98 1.03 1.00 1.0 50 A,B 1.0194 0.9 21.1 

7/3/2008 PAL, Inc. 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 
EPAMethod-25 Ch - >fCustod '.J 

Testing Conpany/Job Number: Air C<>mplianoe Testing lllc I D80609B 

F ac Eity!Loeatioo Tested: (B} Cerie" Ki:n Scrullber Exhaust Stack 

Source Tested: (B) Ceric Kiln ScrubbeJ: Exhaust Stack 

Test Date: 6r2<!a<W8 

Note: Measure trulk absolute pressures dlrectlywilh·a calibrated absolute pressure gauge,!!!:... re<ord the tank vacuum with a Hg manometer and 1econl 

the looal barometric pr..ssure ar the same time. Tape a thennocougie t<J thefank and !"""d the laJ]kteml"'rature e"cll tine ataJ]kpressme is recorded; 

Tank 

Tank Inilia! Tank Final 

----------~· 

lab llSI! 

only 

Locat'on Run No. Trap No. TantNo. 

Initial hemJl'Unil Tank In:tial ·! t Tank Final l Temp!Unill Tank Final I I I o'F 

Pres!Unils I !> Vac!Urils Jnitial BP!Units I Pres!Units s VaciUni!s FinalcB?/Units 1 IMk/ 

:DB06C9B 

08()6V9B 

0806()98 

I 

Relinquished by; 

Reooived by 

'PALJobNo . ....._ 

) 

I 1018 l!}O 

2 1082 ],, 

I w•u '''" I 5mmHo 7IF 727mmHu 732rnmHa 581mmHg . fiF- ls4mmHa 735~ !Z2Ji 'ti/0 

I ·-~- i --- I 4mmHg 7IF 729 mmHg 733 mmH_g_ 533mmHa 74F 201 mmH__;;_ 7J4mmHa i'"'/31_ 'f)/C 

3 1 w'" 1nn~ 1 ,., "~ 1 JmmHg 76F 73lmmHg 734rnmHo 620mmHn 64F JI5mmHg 735minHg X'~ ~o 

' 

NOTES: 

H20 appmx IO'l> 

C02 apjl:'OX (}.4% ·~ 

rzJ:- fo_ELJ All seal£ intO<!? 

..... 

Date: ~e-5 7/ .A l'\ -7/(t' d'S . 

M4'4!#-s~ ' 

Date: '.::/- l:;l:j~ Comments: T 

DlyiceOK? f 

JIY!~>oco 31 
Method .25 Record of Custody Sheet 

Shippingrrransportation Container Number: _ __!.J?Ln~l:___ _______ _ o .. tG: __ 7_. _t_-_Q_s __ _ 

~,oler Number: 

. -····-,-----------.---.----,.-------------, 

Samole I. b. Nurnber 

080609 B· 1 • M25ffP 

~ull Si®atura D.at lime Rea~on for Brt$~k.ing Seal 

(TraP#!otll'. J 

080609 B· 2 • M25ffP 

(Trap# (OfjL. ) 

080609 B- 3 • M25{fP 

(Trap # f ()'1_ J'") 

B .... 

s 

s /. 7 

B 

s 

1',/L.{) ~ n :n 

V». '111 ~;; n 

080609 B· 4 • M25ffP 1-'-'R-+------------+----4-----l 

(Trap # ) s 

080609 13- 1 • M25/TK 

(Tank# f/)f; ) 

B ' 

s / /1 

B L//p l.. / 

s >f.// 

e 

s 

B 

s 

Cl 

s 

Were all seals intact? @!Ye:;::-s,_,..,....--h/1'--'No (~scribe se~li.tl'nd rees<:mipg in the "Re~kjl;) / oKeoelved By sample custodian / 1 f -u "'/~ rf../__.,A- -/ '/ /;</ 07? 

'·aps put in cooler by 

Air Camp/ill.nce T&t:.tlll!h Inc. 

(Method 2S.xls·Record of Custody Sheet) SI111200B 

(Date) 

7.(.06 

(Date) 

-

(f:oC) 

(Time) 
tlldtes: 

PRECISION ANAL Y11CAL LABORATORIES, INC 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE, SU/TE.4, GAINESVILLE, FLORiDA 32653 

(352) 335-1889 FAX (352) 335-1891 

US EPA Reference Method 25 Sample Calculations 

#. . . 

(1.) PAL .. wses 931ibrated piezoelectric digital absolute pressure gauges as well as open endl;ld 

r,nercury (Hg) filled u-tube manometers for field and laboratory pressure measurements •. 

PreSs!) res measured witll. open ended Hg manometers are corrected to absolute (standard) pressures 

usinQ•the folloWing relation: (apsolute P) = (measured P) + (barometric P) 

(2.) Temperatures are recorded in •F or •c and converted to Kelvins using the following relations: 

('F-32)/1.8 + 273.15 = K, and •c + 273.15 = K Standard temperature = zo·c = 293.15K 

(3.) rn' some cases, the equations listed below are expanded versions ofthose presented in 

40CFR F't. 60, 1\pp. A, Meth. 25, pp. 850-851 (Rev. July 1993). 

(4.) lhe folloWing relations are relevant to the equations below: 

293.15K 1 760 mm Hg = 0.3857 j(/mm Hg 

293.15Kl1013 mbar= 0.2894 K/mbar 

293.15Kl29.92" Hg = 9.798 Klin. Hg 

1 atmosphere= 1013 mbar = 760 mm Hg = 29.92" Hg 

1" Hg pressure = 33.863 mbar = 25.401 mm Hg 

Ina following terms are used in the equations below: 

C = TGNMO aoncentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent 

Co = Calculated condensible organic (condensate trap) concentration of the effluent, ppm c equivilJel\t 

Cern= Measured concentration (NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap ICV, ppm C02 + TH. · . ,., 

C~·= Calculated noni:ondensible organic concentration (sample tank) of the effluent, ppm c equiva!~nt: ,·. 

Ctm = Measured cqncentratioh (NMO Analyzer) for the sample tank, ppm NMO. • •. · · ·· · •· · 

me= TGNMC> mass conCI;lntrationof the effluent, mg C/dscril 

· F =sample floW rat~; cclmin. 

Pf = Final pre5sure of the ICV, inches of Hg, absolute. 

Pb =Barometric pressure, inches of Hg or mbar (29.92" Hg = 1013 mbar) 

Pti = Gas sampiE;J tank pressure before sampling, mbar absolute. 

Pt =Gas sample tank. pressure after sampling, mbar absolute. 

?if= Final gas sample l<~nk pressure after pressurizing, inches Hg absolute. 

If= Final temperature of lCV, Kelvins. 

Tti = Sample tank temperature before sampling, Kelvins. 

Tt =Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling, Kelvins. 

ltf = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, Kelvins. 

V;. Sample tank volume, (cc). ·. . 

Vv = rev volume, cc. 

Vs =gas volume sampled, cc. 

· Vt =Sample train volume, cc. (Dimensional calculations yield Ct = 60 cc for PAL trains.) 

n = numbe·r of data points 

q =total humber of analyzer injections of ICV during analysis (where !<=injection number, 1, ···~ q). 

. : ~ 

r =total number of analyzer injections' qf sample, tank during analysis (where j=injection number, 1, ... , r). 

xi = individual measu'rements. · 

x = me~n value 

t.P =Allowable pressur<:> change, inches Hg. 

e ·=leak check period, minutes. ·•··. . 

/ 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE, SUITE 4, GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32653 

(352) 335-1889 FAX (352) 335-1891 

Method-25 Calculations 

Tank Volumes 

Procedure: Each tank was weighed to the nearest gram While filled with ambient air and while filled with 

degassed distilled water. The temperature of the water was measured and the volume of the tank calculated. 

V = [wt. of tank + water (g)) - [wt. of tank + air (g)) I [density of water at the recorded temp. (glee)) 

Pre-Sampling Leak Check Allowable Pressure Change 

<lP = (0.01)(F)(Pb)(S)M = [( 0.01)(100 cc/min)(Pb)(5 min)]/ [ 60 cc] 

<lP = 2.5" Hg for a barometric pressure (Pb) of 29.92" Hg. 

Sample Volume 

Vs = (.3857)(V) [(PUTt) - (Pti/Tti)], or "Vs = (0.2894)(V) [(PUTt) - (Pti/Tti)] 

"This equation includes 11 constant for pressure expressed in mbar. 

Noncondensible Organics. Ct 

Notes: Response factor= (calibration gas concentration, ppm as C) I (instrument response, ppm as C) 

The M-25 analyzer has a reproducble interference of 2.3 ppm NM as C per % C02 in the sample gas stream. 

Ct =8Ptf/Ttf) I · (PUTt)-Pti/Tti)]~1/r };0=1, .. r)Ctmj]- [C02 interference]}= (Analysis VI Vs) (Ctm) 

where Ctm = {[1/r S(j=1, .. r)Ctmj)- [C02 interference]}= [(avg NM integrator response) (Integrator range, ppm) 

(response factor) I (1 000 units full scale)]-[(% C02 in tank at Ptf) (2.3 ppm NM as C interference/%C02l1 

Condensible Organics, Cc 

Cc = (0.3857) (VvNs) [1/q };(k=1, .. q)Ccmk] (Pf /Tf) 

where [1/q S(k=1, .. q)Ccmk] 

and Cern= (average C02 peak ht.) I (1000 ht. units full scale) (C02 range, ppm) (response factor) 

TGNMO Concentration 

C=Ct+Cc 

TGNMO Mass Concentration 

me, mg/dscm =( 0.4993) (C) 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. INC.: US EPA METHOD-25 SAMPLE RECOVERY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST 

US EPA Reference Method 25 Sample Recovery System Performance Test, November 28-29, 2006. 

Performance Requirements: Average Recovery= 1 00±1 0%, triplicate analyses agree within a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 5%. 

Syringe loads of hexane and decane were weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg before and after injection using an Adam AAA160L analytical microbalance 

(Serial# AE048A114227), certified October, 2006. Analyst: Charles G. Simon, Ph.D. 

Hexane carbon content= 83.623% by weight !Decane carbon content= 84.412% by weight I ' 

' I 

Calculations: (mg C recovered)(100%)/mg C injected)-% recovery l 

ppmC in ICV-[(cal gas C02 concentration, ppm)(ICV C02 area counts)/(avg before and after C02 cal gas area counts)]+ ppmC hydrocarbon in ICV 

(ppmC in ICV)(ICV analysis volume in cubic meters)(0.4993)- mg C recovered I ; I 

I I mg ICV I Analysis I avg, before I avg. after avg. ICV j ppm ppm mgC f 

I mg I Carbon ICV Vol. I Pf Tf Vol. I 9970 C0219970 C02 

1 

I C02 area 1 C02 in HC in recovere I % 

' ICV \ d 1 Sample ID injected injected No. ml I psia OF ml area counts area counts counts 1 ICV Recovery ' 

Run-4 hexane \ 3,112 I 23.5o I I 

9.6 8.03 146 78 4,978 15,362 15,263 I 4,866 3,168 2.3 ! 7.88 98.2% 

Run-5 hexane \ 10.8 9.03 147 3,173 I 23.58 78 4,997 I 15,288 15,298 5,400 

I 

3,521 2.1 I 8.79 97.3% 

Run-6 hexane I I 

! 

9.8 8.20 148 3,175 I 24.02 78 5,093 15,288 I 15,298 4,784 I 3,119 1.8 7941 96.8% ' i I 

I I I ! Average Low Hexane Recovery: 97.4% 

I Relative Standard Deviation 0.7% 

I I ' I I 

Run-1 hexane 42.4 35.46 139 3,163 , 22.98 76 4,872 I 15,550 ! 15,362 22,649 ! 14,610 2.8 I 35.55 100.3% 

Run-2 hexane 38.1 31.86 143 3,158 23.1o I 76 4,890 I 15,550 15,362 19,954 I 2.6 31.43\ 98.7% I 1 12,871 

Run-3 hexane 36.0 30.10 144 3,172 24.70 78 5,232 

I 

15,550 15,362 17,850 11,514 2.7 30.091 99.9% 

I I I I Average High Hexane Recovery: I 99.6% I ' ' I 

I I ' I Relative Standard Deviation ' 0.9% 

' I I Run-7 decane 7.0 5.91 1149 3,110 1 22.54 79 4,763 15,035 14,971 I 3.6 ! ' 3,644 2,421 5.77 97.6% I 

Run-8 decane [ I I ' I 

4,766 ! I 1,5311 2.6 I I 

4.5 3.80 \150j 3,172122.541 79 15,035 14,971 2,304 I 3.65 96.1% I ' I 

1511 3,177 i 22.58 I 78 4, 791 I ! Run-9 decane I 7.3 6.16 15,035 I 14,971 I 3,812 i 2,5331 1.9 I 6.06 98.4% 

I 

I I i I Average Low Decane Recovery: 97.4% 

I I i ! Relative Standard De~•iation 1.2% I 

i 152\ 3,174 22.70 I 78 I 4,812 I I I 

Run-10 decane 37.6 31.74 14,971 31.84\ 100.3% i ' 14,877 19,833 13,250 5.6 ' 

Run-11 decane 40.8 I 34.44 1531 3,172\24.60 78 5,211 14,877 I 15,001 19,805 13,2181 2.4 34.401 99.9% 

Run-12 decane 1 154 I 3,111 1 24.68 I 

37.7 31.82 78 5,226 3.5 I I 

I 15,001 14,916 18,001 11,998 31.32 98.4% 

i Average High Decane Recovery: I 99.5% 

I I I Relative Standard De~•iation \ 1.0% I I 

11/29/2006 Precision Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 2106 NW67th Place, S-4, Gainesville, Florida 32653. Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891. 
II 

II 

II 

II 

II 

II 

II 

II 

RATA CLASS 

Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay laboratory 

P.O. No.: 792736 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-82649-001 

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 ' PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

Phone: 800-331-4953 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGRING 

21 06 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

Fax: 215-766-7226 

This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol For Ass8y & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G~ 1; September, 1997. 

Cylinder Number: ALM055366 Certification Date: 28May2008 Exp. Date: 28May2011 

Cylinder PressUre***: 2000 PSIG 

COMPONENT 

PROPANE 

AIR 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) 

20.1 PPM 

BALANCE 

** * Do not use ·when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig, 

ANALYTICAL 

ACCURACY** TRACEABILITY 

+I· 1% Direct NIST and NMi 

** Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G1, September 1997. 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

TYPEISRM NO. 

NTRM 1667 

EXPIRATION DATE 

04Jui2008 

CYLINDER NUMBER 

ALM022121 

CONCENTRATION 

49.80 PPM 

COMPONENT 

PROPANE 

II INSTRUMENTATION 

II 

II 

II 

II 

II· 

II 

' 

INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# 

VAR!AN/3300/7945 

ANALYZER READINGS 

DATE LAST CALIBRATED 

28May2008 

ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

GC/FID 

First Triad Analysis 

(Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas T=Test Gas 

Se·cond Triad Analysis 

r =Correlation Coefficient) 

Calibration Curve 

PROPANE 

Date: 28May2008 Response Unit:AREA 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 = 252854.0 

R2='252599.0 Z2=0,00000 

Z3=0.00000 T3=101775.0 

Avg. Concentration: 20.10 

T1=101663.0 

T2= 101846.0 

R3 = 252538.0 

PPM 

Concentration"" A + Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 

r=.9999997 1668 

Constants: 

B=1.96999E..04 

o• 

A=4.82868E-02 

c.,.1,31022E-12 

E• 

APPROVED BY:~.-,, -· 0 .. . ~HN C. FTZ 

·· ... __ _.L'---·=~===P,.;ag;;.e===1 ,;o=f=1"'"""================= 
Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

1290 COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 248-589-213 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay laboratory Customer 

P.O. No.: PAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES 

1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

TROY,MI 48083 

Project No.: 05-43082-008 

SUITE #1 0 

21 06 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

This certification was performed according to EPA T~_ay,!3;CJbi'!._itY.'J~(p~Q'cl?.J"ifpr .. J-:._s.~ay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997. ·;··---:·";·.)·····>··---~ ·· · -'c'.··:-; ..... ,-_,. 

Cylinder Number: ALM013029 ___ ;:,e,(;:• '<i'd~rtification Date: 1tM~y:ZQ06 Exp. Date: 16May2009 

Cylinder Pressure• • ·•: 1 ~-~ge,PSIG i:·•··-•·· · •.,_,,,, .. '•': . 

COMPONENT Ri:cuRAcv• • 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

CARBON MONOXIDE 

METHANE 

· ··"cERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) TRACEABILITY 

PROPANE 

AIR ~:} 

9

'

93'k•c63 

48c9s 

19:91 

+ 1- 1 o/o·'"' 

+/- 1%''' 

+I- 1 o/o 

+I- 1 o/o 

Direct NIST and NMi 

Direct NIST and NMi 

Direct NIST and N Mi 

Direct NIST and NMi 

* ~- * Do not use when cyllnde[_::·:pfessure is below 150 psig. 

* * Analytical accuracy is bas~d: ."on the requirements of EPA P~Otoc_o! Procedu;~::.-·G'f;/S_~-Ptember 

REFERENCE ST ANDARI:f:} 

TYPE/SRM NO. EXPIRATION DATE 

NTRM 2300 

NTRM 1679 

NTRM 2750 

NTRM 1667 

01Jan2008 

02Aprz,(;07 

01Mar2007 

04Ju!29~:~ 

INSTRUMENTATION ... 

INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# 

VAR!AN/3400/10693 

HORIBA/A 1A-220/57297601 

VAR!AN/3400/7506 

V AR!AN/3600/0455 

ANALYZER READINGS 

First Triad Analysis 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

Date: 04May2006 Response Unit:MV 

1997, 

·,_:f:,:;,: ,_, 

CYLINDER NUMBER •. ,,,citMS~~f~ATION ALM049142 \..;;/_:_··"::'<.}., • , .... ,,·:; .. ·:.~-~,::~: .. 23.34 % 

ALM026128 :.:.::" ·:;.:,-.:;-:,'-,::r:~- :f\~1-90 PPM 

ALM009178 .. ,. · --t.>·:;:,:- ,-. 49'·80 PPM 

ALM01922~_./_:,··-·/ ·, --~~:::4;e:::?P~:,P,PM 

DATE LAS:;f~t!BRATED 04Ma"/2006~~[: 

.,_._:,.:_ .. ::·-~:-~~-A~.flQ 9b~~;-i~.:- -·-· ;:-,;-g_J.fyl.~Y?9P6 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 = 1165579. T1 =50484.00 

R2=1167434. 22=0.00000 T2=50233.00 

Z_3=0.00000 T3=50126.00 R3=1165977. 

Avg. Concentration: 9933. PPM 

CARBON MONOXIDE 

Date: 08May2006 Response Unit:PPM 

Z1 =:0.00000 R1 ==105.0000 T1 =57.10000 

R2=1 04.9000 22=0.00000 T2=57.10000 

23=0.00000 T3=57.00000 R3=104.8000 

Avg. Concentration: 50.81 PPM 

METHANE 

Date: 16May2006 Response Unlt:AREA 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 =3703708. T1 =376479.0 

R2=3702348. 22==0.00000 T2=376799.0 

Z3=0.00000 T3=376546.0 R3=3691508. 

Avg. Concentration: 48.98 PPM 

PROPANE 

Date: 09May2006 Response Unit:AREA 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 =51668.00 T1 =20604.00 

R2=51663.00 22=0.00000 T2=20547.00 

Z3=0.00000 T3=20588.00 R3=51621.00 

Date: 15May2006 Response Unit: PPM 

21 =0.00000 R1 =105.0000 T1 =57.00000 

R2 = 104.9000 22=0.00000 T2 =56.90000 

Z3=0.00000 T3=56.90000 R3=105.2000 

Avg. Concentration: 51.24 PPM 

·-:)'" 

i/:_::\ 

COMPONEIIIi 

g~~:g~ ~gM~:,oE METHANE }_;~r 

PROPANE 

. ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY 

NDIR 

TCD/F!D 

FLAME IONIZATION 

:-;··Calibration Curve 

Concentration ""A+ Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 

I =0,999999 

Constants: 

8=0.00002 

D=O 

A =-0.012965 

c~o 

E~o 

Concentration =A + Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 

r""'0.999992 

Constants: 

8=0.870621 

D=O 

A=0.661739 

C=0.000317 

E=O 

Concentration ""'A +Bx +Cx2 +Dx3 + Ex4 

r=0.999989 

Constants: 

8=0.000133 

0=0 

A=~1.545108 

C=O 

E=O 

Concentration =A+ Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 

r=0.999994 

Constants: 

8~0.000975 

A=0.081195 

c~o 
Scott Specialty Gases ® Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

1290 COMBE;RMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assav laboratory 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES 

1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

TROY,MI 48083 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Project No.: 05-43082-008 

Phone: 248-589-2950 

Customet 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #1 0 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

Fax: 248-589-213 

This certification was performed according to EPA Tr_ac_~f.'!.?.iUW-'·~protOC(l).-.'·P?f:,-:_t\~say & Certification Of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G-1; September, 1997. : :---,·.'.(_-(::<:;_~p·'.·:· · · ··-: -· · ·' ~,~/-':~·:/: 

Cylinder Number: AlM013029 .•. ;+('i'· · Certification Date: 17Mav;?P06 Exp. Date: 16May2009 

Cylinder Pressure***: 1 .. :;?p;,;<PSIG ___ ,'.:-:.<~·:·:<. :··:' >:"·_ •. , • · ·:> 

ANALYZER READINGS o> · R Refef'ence Gas ! "'".lest Gas -C'~-r~reJatiOn Coe'ff1c1ent) 

~rcond Tri~d !1~.41}~{~ 

... ,w: 

First Triad Analysis Calibration Curve 

Special Notes: REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 9 GAS MIX) 

APPROVED BY: -1'1~~ \,\ A'f!-WIAl.,!~ ~W,~f\ib<lo/\ ___ _ ~~ffilR 
· -_ ~--_-- -_ ---s -_- --_ .. ---._--. --.-- c·--- -- _ .. -----·- scott ·· :pectalty ·- ases 

A1liR CIDNS~L T I'NG ~ ENG~I'NG 

CAS Reg . Compone111't No . 

l

•r;)w ·ms·· ·s, '\'&;f!t~.~' __ '!:;_} 

'69.0~08~0' -.,w ·a,o- ·s· r~ .. ~ ~~ , 

-?4 .. 9.8•6 : ~ 

1'32259;..;li0"0 -

Compone111-t 

. e~RB.GN, ffill\ffi~l\IDE -

CBRBffiN, iMONIDXmDE .- . . . 

MEmffi~NE. 

PRIDPANE 

Rii:R 

Ces:titi.cat_ e. -~f Accuracy - .PO No. 792?c36 . -

ee:rt i·f ted -

amail:ys:i:& 

5.011 . PPMv 

S0il. PPMY 

600.- PPMt 

200. PP.MV 

B~L 

---------------------------------~-----------------------------------------~-*-- Ame:'lig:s:its m.a1te 28Mal20.0.8 

Ama:l1gs:t' J.0MN C .F' ITZ 

_ Eox1p!l\raM:.om ma\t:e 28Mpg20ill 

G.rade, ~RE~ERENeE ffii!!ASS . . '· .. 

Procl.e.c:'i Ne 0ll,-i8864:9 

Cg:Li~mder t AttM05.8.5.5.6 

I b.em No . 0il\02C5000l!!SmAL ~~~ 

\\ 

.>::> 

---..,_ 

,-Q 

\)) 

N 

~ 
REFERENCE CLASS 

Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Certified Calibration Standard 

6 I 41 EAS I 01\1 ROAD, BLDG I ,PLO!VIS I EADVILLE,PA I 8949~0310 PhOne: 800~33 I ~4953 Fax: 215-/66-/226 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard · 

Product Information 

Project No.: 01-49994-010 

Item No.: 01 02C500282QAL 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Cylinder Number: ALM004892 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 15May2006 

Expiration Date: 14May2009 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

Component Name 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

~~~~~~tONOXIDE 

PROPANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

APPROVED BY: 

Page 1 of 2 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #1 0 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

. \,~\~::'Ac~unicy 

( + J,o/o) 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Traceable To 

NIST 

GMIS, SRS 

DATE: 
'''"" 

SPECIFICATIONS i ·.-~ Requested Gravim~tric · Analyzed 

Concentration Concentration Concentration 

Comnonent Name (Moles) (Moles) (Moles) 

CARB9N DIOXIDE 

CARBON MONOXIDE 

MErnANll 

PROPANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceability 

Method 

25,000. 

9,000. 

9,000. 

3,000. 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Analytical Traceability 

Type/SRM No. 

GM!S 3 COMP 

GMIS 3 COMP 

CH4/N2 2.5% 

C3H8/N2 .33% 

Instrumentation 

MTI/M200/1 

MTI/M200/170927 

MTI/M200/170927 

MTI/M200/170927 

Expiration Date 

14Jun2006 

14Jun2006 

12Dec2007 

23Ju12006 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

P!M 25,000. 

P!M 9,010. 

P!M 9,010. 

P!M 3,000. 

Traceability To 

NIST 

Cylinder Number 

A~M066991 

ALM066991 

A11789 

KD11239 

Date last Calibrated 

01May2006 

01May2006 

15May2006 

15May2006 

P!M 

P!M 

P!M 

P!M 

25,100. 

9,030. 

9,000. 

2,990. 

Concentration 

16.00 % 

7610. PPM 

2.506 % 

,3301. PPM 

P!M 

P!M 

P!M 

P!M 

Analytical Principle 

GC-TCD 

GC-TCD 

GC-TCD 

GC-TCD 

Pressure: 

Expiration Date: 

2000 PSIG 

14May2009 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Blend 

Blend Process A~alytic~f 

Tolerance Accuracy Accuracy 

Result Result Result 

(+/- %) 1+/- %) 1+/- %) 

.0 1.00 

.1 1.00 

.1 1.00 

.o 1.00 

Component 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

CA.RBON MONOXIDE 

METHANE 

PROPANE 

Analytical Method 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

.~·· 

Do not use or store cylinder at c;>r below the s~ated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew 'point temperatUre may result in calibration error. 

COMMENTS 

REF:TQ06-1227(1TEM 11 GAS MIX) 

DISCOUNT PER J.MUNLEY/D.HUDGEN 

ORIGINAL QUOTE @ $1600 

/ 

Page 2 of 2 

lnterl~cking 

Result 

1+/- %) 

.40 

.20 

.10 

.30 
,, 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: 

Product Information 

Project No.: 01-49994-004 

Item No.: 01022713 QAL 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Cylinder Number: ALM026874 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 12May2006 

Expiration Date: 11 May2009 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

Component Name 

METHANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Description 

BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY 

ANALYTICAL TRACEABILiTY 

APPROVED BY: 

FERENCE CLASS 

ual-Certified Calibration Standard 

Reference Class Calibration Standard 

Page 1 of 2 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #10 

21 06 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

:··.:A'h¢.l!racy 

(+!-%) 

1 

Traceable To 

NIST 

SRS 

DATE: 
I 

\ 

SPECIFICATIONS (j_, Od (0 C fl;!) 

Requested Gravimetric Analyzed 

Concentration Concentration Concentration 

Comoonent Name 

MEmlANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceability 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Analytical Traceability 

Type/SRM No. 

CH4/N2 2.5% 

Instrumentation 

'"' < </<"<.VW <!VOL! 

Expiration Date 

12Dec2007 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

{Moles) {Moles) {Moles) 

1. % 

Traceability To 

NIST 

LOO 

Cylinder Number 

A117B9 

Date Last Calibrated 

12May2006 

% 0.99 

Concentration 

2.506 % 

% 

Analytical Principle 

GC-TCD 

Pressure: 

Expiration Date: 

1660 PSIG 

11May2009 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Blend 

Blend Process 

Tolerance Accuracy 

Result Result 

{+/- %) {+/- %) 

.0 1.00 

Component 

METHANE 

Analyticat 

Ac~uracy 

Result 

{ + ,_ %) 

1.00 

Analytical Method 

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew po!nt temperature may result in calibration error. 

COMMENTS -

REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 4 GAS MIX) 

FLAM-OX RESTRICTION: -1670 PSIA 

Page 2 of 2 

Interlocking 

Result 

[+/- %) 

1.00 
,, q170 

Scott Specialty Gasetr----

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 ,PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 1 B949-031 0 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay Laboratory 

P.O. No.: PAL 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-49994-005 

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 

PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 

ANAlYTICAl INFORMATION\ 

Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #10 

21 06 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

This certification was performed according to EPA ·Iri,'I:9~8BiiitY'''Pi-btOC·8(··F6'rA::r.s<:~y & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G-1; September, 1997. 1-::·:'}_'_:;··· .,.~:,i_·,, 

g~::~~:: ~~::::~•••: ~;~g~~~~2 Certi.: .• i.ti§>iJDa~~i< • 08M~~~OQ~\•• ...... Exp. Date: 07May2009 

······ AN~ty:pCAL COMPONENT 

CARBON DIOXIDE ,.;{y· CERTIF~~;:tNCENTR,fi~~~~tl AIR .<·.:>- .. ·,y\ <~:~- "·'"''·':,:~;}:~: 

*** Do not use when cylindia-:~ressure is below 150 psig.·--·1:+~!::____ :··~~;: __ :·::~t;:·i~:·- ... 

** Analytical accuracy is ba~El'd on the requirements of EPA PiO~oc·ol ProcedUi'f,{_;_·:01:;·::·:s·eptember 

NTRM 2622 

INSTRUMENTATION 

INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERiAL# 

MTI/M200/170927 

ANALYZER READINGS( 

First Triad Analysis 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

Qate: 08May2006 Response Unit:AREA 

Z1 =0.00000 R1 ""91499.00 

R2=91647.00 Z2=0.00000 

~3=0.00000 T3,46139.00 

Avg. Concentration: ~970. 

Special Notes: 

T1 ""46100.00 

T2=46088.00 

A3=S1652.00 

PPM 

ACCURACY** TRACEABILITY 

1997. 

Direct NIST and· NMi 

COMPONE~~ CARBON D16$21DE ;-::;;"c. 

:·.:{-~ 

'.';·.~·fj 

;);/ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

· Constants: 

B=2.1775E-05 

D• 

2622 

A=-6.1770E-03 

C• 

E• 
SPECIFICATIONS <f77P (O,t 

ReqUested etric 

Concentration Concentration 

Component Name 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

NITRCGEN 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceability 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

PHYSICAl PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

(Moles) 

4. % 

BI\L 

Traceability To 

NIST 

(Moles) 

4.00 % 

BI\L 

Pressure: 201 5 PSIG 

Blend 

Tolerance 

Result 

(+/· %) 

.o 

Expiration Date: 14May2008 

SPECIAl HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Blend 

Process 

Accuracy 

Result 

( +/· %) 

1.00 

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stateq dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 1 5 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error. 

Page 2 of 2 
. g}l/ (]. 

Scott Specialty Gases..____. 

6141· EASION ROAD, BLDG !,PCUMSIEADVILLE,PA 18949~0310 

REFERENCE CLASS 

Dual-Certified Calibration Standard 

Phone: 800~331-4953 Fax; 215-166-/226 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard 

Product Information 

Project No.: 01-49994-007 

Item No.: 01 020000430QAL 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Cylinder Number: ALM006827 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 12May2006 

Expiration Date: 11 May?OOS 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

Component Name 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Description 

BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY 

ANALYTICAL TRACEABILITY 

APPROVED BY: 

Qc::) 

l} 

~ 

~ ~-

-t 

~ 

\.) 

I 

<+> 

cc:. 

Concentration 

(Moles) 

50.1 PPM 

BALANCE 

Traceability Type 

WEIGHT 

GAS STANDARDS 

Page 1 of 2 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #1 0 

21 06 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

Accuracy 

(+/-%) 

Traceable To 

NIST 

SRS 

DATE: 
SPECIFICATIONS 50r/ (0). 

Requested Grav1 Analyzed 

Concentration Concentration Concentration 

Component Name (Moles) (Moles) (Moles) 

CARBON DIOXIDE . 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceability 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Analytical TraceabUity 

50. 

Type/SRM. No. 

C02/N2 .015% 

Expiration Date 

21Jun2006 

Instrumentation 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

PPM 50.1 

Cylinder Number 

ALM031683 

Date last Calibrated 

12May2006 

PPM 50.0 

Concentration 

150.0 PPM 

CO/C02 

Pressure: 2000 PSIG 

Expiration Date: 11 May2008 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

PPM 

Blend 

Blend Process Analyticc-1 

Tolerance AcCuracy Accuracy 

Result Result Result 

(+/- %) (+/- %) (+/· %) 

.2 1.00 1.00 

Analytical Method 

Do not use or store cylinder ~t or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 1 5 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error. 

COMMENTS 

REF:TQ06-1227 liTEM 8 GAS MIX} 

_Interlocking 

Result 

(+/- %) /" 

.10 

r 

. 

' 
First Analytical Laboratories 

ANALYSIS REPORT 

Method 26A 

Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid 

Project # 080609 

Prepared for: 

Air Compliance Testing 

5525 Canal Road 

Valley View, OH 44125 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

William H. Wadlin, Ph. D. 

Laboratory Manager 

July 11, 2008 

Do not reproduce this report except in whole without the permission of the laboratory. 

1 of22 
First Analytical Laboratories 

CASE NARRATIVE 

Project #: 80704 

Client: Air Compliance Testing 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Samples: 

Report Date: 11-Jul-08 

Twenty-five samples were submitted for determination of hydrochloric acid 

and hydrofluoric acid by method 26A, one of which was the field blank. Two audit 

samples were included with this project. The samples were received in good 

condition with no apparent leakage. Any remaining amounts of the samples will be 

retained by the laboratory for six months and then discarded. 

Preparation: 

No sample preparation was required. A minimum dilution of20X is required 

to prevent column saturation by the sulfate ion contributed by the 0.1 N sulfuric acid 

matrix. 

Analysis: 

HCl and HF were determined as chloride and fluoride respectively by Ion 

Chromatography with conductivity detection (IC). 

Results: 

The results are presented as total milligrams of HCl and HF trapped in the 

whole solution. HCl was measurable in seven of the twenty-four field samples, and 

ranged from just above the detection limit of 0.1 mg up to 5. 8 mg. HF was found 

in only five of the twelve B series samples ranging from 0.5 mg to 2.3 mg. HF was 

found in all of the A series samples with levels from 5.5 mg to 335 mg. 

Quality Control: 

No HCl or HF were detected in the blank. All of the samples were analyzed 

in duplicate. The ending calibration was in good agreement with the initial 

calibration. The spike recoveries ranged from 97% to 100%, which is well within 

the normal range of75% to 125%. The results for the audit samples are shown on 

the calculation worksheet. 

2 of22 
First Analytical Laboratories 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517 

ANALYSIS REPORT 

Tel. (9 I 9) 942-8607 

FAJ( (919) 929-8688 

www.frrstanalyticallabs.com 

Project#: 80704 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Report Date: 11 -Jul-08 

Date Received: 08-Jul-08 

Sample 

080609A-8L-M26A 

0806098- 1-KO 

0806098-1-IMP1 

0806098- 1-IMP2 

0806098- 1-IMP3 

0806098-2-KO 

0806098-2-IMP1 

0806098-2-IMP2 

0806098-2-IMP3 

0806098-3-KO 

0806098-3-IMP1 

0806098-3-IMP2 

0806098-3-IMP3 

Spike, % Recovery 

Total Milligrams in Sample 

HCI 

mg 

< 0.8 

< 0.3 

< 0.4 

< 0.3 

< 0.2 

< 0.5 

< 0.4 

< 0.3 

< 0.1 

< 0.4 

0.7 

0.4 

< 0.1 

HF 

mg 

< 0.8 

1.7 

0.5 

< 0.3 

< 0.2 

2.1 

< 0.4 

< 0.3 

< 0.1 

2.3 

0.7 

< 0.4 

< 0.1 

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

100% 98% 

3 of 22 
First Analytical Laboratories 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517 

ANALYSIS REPORT 

Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

www.firstanalyticallabs.com 

Project #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Jul-08 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Date Received: 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Total Milligrams in Sample 

Sample 

080609A-1-KO 

080609A-1-IMP1 

080609A-1-IMP2 

080609A-1-IMP3 

080609A-2-KO 

080609A-2-IMP1 

080609A-2-IMP2 

080609A-2-IMP3 

080609A-3-KO 

080609A-3-IMP1 

080609A-3-IMP2 

080609A-3-IMP3 

Spike, % Recovery 

Spike, % Recovery 

HCI HF 

mg mg 

5.8 303 

0.4 26.2 

< 0.3 12.4 

0.1 10.6 

3.5 226 

< 0.5 34.2 

< 0.4 10.8 

< 0.1 5.5 

5.6 335 

< 0.3 27.2 

< 0.3 10.1 

< 0.1 7.4 

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

98% 

99% 

4 of22 

97% 

100% 

08-Jul-08 
CHLORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 1 0-Jul-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HCI 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609 A-8L-M26A 80704.8 0.02 408 0.37 20 < 0.82 

0806098-1 -KO 80704.810 0.06 157 0.87 20 < 0.31 

0806098-1-IMP1 80704.811 0.02 210 0.22 20 < 0.42 

0806098-1-IMP2 80704.812 0.01 164 0.07 20 < 0.33 

0806098-1-IMP3 80704.813 0.00 80 0.00 20 < 0.16 

0806098-2-KO 80704.820 0.05 229 0.76 20 < 0.46 

0806098-2-IMP1 80704.821 0.02 214 0.34 20 < 0.43 

0806098-2-IMP2 80704.822 0.05 170 0.76 20 < 0.34 

0806098-2-IMP3 80704.823 0.03 55 0.42 20 < 0.11 

0806098-3-KO 80704.830 0.05 204 0.77 20 < 0.41 

0806098-3-IMP1 80704.831 0.15 232 2.22 20 0.71 

0806098-3-IMP2 80704.832 0.12 182 1.73 20 0.43 

0806098-3-IMP3 80704.833 0.08 72 1.18 20 < 0.14 

080609 A-1 -KO 80704.A10 0.19 303 2.80 100 5.81 

080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 0.12 158 1.77 20 0.38 

080609A-1-IMP2 80704.A12 0.06 170 0.86 20 < 0.34 

Spike 80704.81 OS 2.99 157 43.68 % Rec. = 99.6% 

Spike 80704.A12S 2.95 170 43.13 % Rec. = 98.4% 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Cone. 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg/L 

mg/L ml of Cl 

Audits 

M26A-3756-03 80704.L2728 9.61 500 140.35 40 7.47 

M26A-3756-04 80704.L2752 9.60 500 140.28 40 7.47 

5 of22 
CHLORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

Proj. #: 80704 

Dale: 1 0-Jul-08 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 15.73 1.0 14.61 

Standard 2 43.31 3.0 43.83 

Standard 3 84.30 6.0 87.66 

Standard 4 145.13 10.0 146.10 

Standard 5 218.00 15.0 219.16 

Standard 6 294.60 20.0 292.21 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99971 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 1.863 X Variable 14.61 

Observations 7 

6 of22 
FLUORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Dale: 1 0-Jul-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HF 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-BL-M26A 80704.8 0.00 408 0.00 20 < 0.82 

080609B-1-KO 80704.B10 0.53 157 12.54 20 1.67 

080609B-1-IMP1 80704.B11 0.12 210 2.84 20 0.51 

080609B-1-IMP2 80704.B12 0.00 164 0.00 20 < 0.33 

080609B-1-IMP3 80704.B13 0.00 80 0.00 20 < 0.16 

080609B-2-KO 80704.620 0.46 229 10.70 20 2.08 

080609B-2-IMP1 80704.B21 0.08 214 1.84 20 < 0.43 

080609B-2-IMP2 80704.B22 0.00 170 0.00 20 < 0.34 

080609B-2-IMP3 80704.B23 0.00 55 0.00 20 < 0.11 

080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.56 204 13.11 20 2.27 

080609B-3-IMP1 80704.B31 0.15 232 3.45 20 0.68 

080609B-3-IMP2 80704.B32 0.08 182 1.78 20 < 0.36 

080609B-3-IMP3 80704.B33 0.05 72 1 '19 20 < 0.14 

080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 10.00 303 235.10 100 302.9 

080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 8.30 158 195.16 20 26.23 

080609A-1-IMP2 80704.A12 3.66 170 86.03 20 12.44 

Spike 80704.B1 OS 3.47 157 81.66 % Rec. = 98.0% 

Spike 80704.A12S 6.56 170 154.22 % Rec. = 96.7% 

7of22 
FLUORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Clienl: Air Compliance Tesling, Inc. 

Proj. #: 80704 

Dale: 1 0-Jul-08 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration 

Blank 

S!andard 1 

Slandard 2 

Slandard 3 

S!andard 4 

S!andard 5 

Slandard 6 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 

Slandard Error 

Observalions 

Peak Area 

0.00 

23.55 

69.08 

137.30 

242.22 

351.53 

469.01 

0.99963 

3.407 

7 

True cone. ppm 

0.0 

1.0 

3.0 

6.0 

10.0 

15.0 

20.0 

lnlercepl 

X Variable 

8 of22 

0 

23.51 

Regression 

0.00 

23.51 

70.54 

141.09 

235.15 

352.72 

470.30 
CHLORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentrn = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 11-Jul-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HCI 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 0.13 29 1.92 20 0.08 

080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 0.15 234 2.18 100 3.51 

080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 0.05 253 0.78 20 < 0.51 

080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 0.04 174 0.65 20 < 0.35 

080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 0.06 66 0.89 20 < 0.13 

080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 0.21 266 3.08 100 5.63 

080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 0.06 162 0.87 20 < 0.32 

080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 0.04 165 0.58 20 < 0.33 

080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 0.08 72 1.20 20 < 0.14 

Spike 80704.A21 S 2.97 157 43.21 % Rec. = 99.0% 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 15.81 1.0 14.55 

Standard 2 43.43 3.0 43.64 

Standard 3 84.10 6.0 87.28 

Standard 4 144.36 10.0 145.46 

Standard 5 217.14 15.0 218.19 

Standard 6 293.18 20.0 290.92 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99973 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 1.786 X Variable 14.55 

Observations 7 

9 of 22 
FLUORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL= 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 11-Jul-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HF 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 18.28 29 352.86 20 10.60 

080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 9.66 234 186.40 100 226.0 

080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 6.76 253 130.41 20 34.19 

080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 3.11 174 60.00 20 10.82 

080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 4.17 66 80.53 20 5.51 

080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 12.61 266 243.36 100 335.4 

080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 8.38 162 161.84 20 27.17 

080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 3.07 165 59.29 20 10.14 

080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 5.14 72 99.28 20 7.41 

Spike 80704.A21 S 9.76 157 188.33 % Rec. = 100.0% 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True cone. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 20.93 1.0 19.30 

Standard 2 59.09 3.0 57.91 

Standard 3 113.46 6.0 115.81 

Standard 4 196.66 10.0 193.02 

Standard 5 287.07 15.0 289.54 

Standard 6 386.53 20.0 386.05 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99977 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 2.203 X Variable 19.30 

Observations 7 

10 of22 
First Analytical laboratories 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. 

Chapel Hill, NC 27514 

Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

-8070it 

c h . amo fC us t 0 d R d y ecor 

Samole# Run# Contnr. # Matrix" 

0806098-1- M26AIKO 1 3 ~so ml 0.1 N H2S04/107 ml H20 

0806098-1- M26AIIMP1 1 3 *100 ml 0.1 N H2S04/110 ml H20 

0806098-1- M26AIIMP2 1 3 *100 ml 0.1N H2S04/64 ml H20 

0806098 -1- M26AIIMP3 1 3 80 ml H20 

0806098 -2- M26AIKO 2 3 •so mi0.1N H2S04/179 ml H20 

0806098 -2- M26AIIMP1 2 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/114miH20 

0806098 -2- M26AIIMP2 2 3 •100 ml 0.1N H2S04/70 ml H20 

0806098 -2- M26AIIMP3 2 3 55 ml H20 

0806098 -3- M26AIKO 3 3 *50 ml 0.1N H2S04/154 ml H20 

0806098 -3- M26AIIMP1 3 3 *100 ml 0.1N H2S04/132 ml H20 

0806098 -3- M26AIIMP2 3 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/82miH20 

0806098 -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 ml H20 

~ Represents total sample volume 

Relinouished 8v: Date: 

Received 8v: 1-l-.U 'tJ.-u ·=t P7 f) Date 7/ {:3 /7.L>09., 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

(Method 26A.xls-First Analytical Labs BH1) 717/2008 

11 of22 

Air Compliance Testing Project# : 080609 

Date Shipped: 717/2008 

PO# 423 

Shipper: UPS 

Airbill#: 

Page: 1 of 2 

Comments 

Samples split to: 

Samples were not sPlit rior to shinment 

The contents of each impinaer were recovered 

seoaratelv and should be analvzed and reoorted seoaratelv. 

Analyze all samples for (HCil and (HF) 

as per section 11.1 

EPA Method 26A 

Notes: If questions contact: 

Rob Lisy 216.525.0900 x 232 

Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235 

Job Number·:._----- Date: ____ _ 

Checked By: ____ _ 
First Analytical Laboratories 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. 

Chapel Hill, NC 27514 

Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

-8070~ 

Cham of Custody Record 

Sample# Run # Contnr. # Matrix* 

080609A -1- M26AIKO 1 3 ·so ml 0.1 N H2S04/253 ml H20 

080609A -1· M26AIIMP1 1 3 *1 00 ml 0.1 N H2S04 I 58 ml H20 

080609A -1- M26AIIMP2 1 3 *100 ml0.1NH2S04/70miH20 

080609A -1- M26AIIMP3 1 3 29 ml H20 

080609A -2- M26AIKO 2 3 ·so ml o.1N H2S04; 184 ml H20 

080609A -2- M26AIIMP1 2 3 '"100 mi0.1NH2S04/153m!H20 

080609A ·2- M26AIIMP2 2 3 *100 mi0.1NH2S04/74miH20 

080609A -2- M26AIIMP3 2 3 66 ml H20 

080609A -3· M26AIKO 3 3 *50 mi0.1NH2S04/216miH20 

080609A -3- M26AIIMP1 3 3 *100 m!0.1NH2S04/62miH20 

080609A -3· M26AIIMP2 3 3 "100 ml 0.1N H2S04/55 ml H20 

080609A -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 ml H20 

080609A -BL· M26A Blank 6 "200 ml 0.1 N H2S04 /208 ml H20 

* Represents total sample volume 

Relinouished By: Date: 

Received By:U. 1' •• v~.c. 

' 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 12 of 22 

(Method 26A.xi&-First Analytical Labs BH1) 7f712008 

Air Compliance Testing Project # : 080609 

Date Shipped: 7f1/2008 

PO# 423 

Shipper: UPS 

Airbill#: 

Page: 2 of 2 

Comments 

Samples split to: 

Samples were not spli~_prior to shlp!llent 

The contents of each impinger were recovered 

seoaratelv and should be analyzed and reported separately. 

Analvze all samples for (HCI) and (HF) 

as per section 11. 1 

EPA Method 26A 

Notes: If questions contact: 

Rob Lisv 216.525.0900 x 232 

Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235 

Job Number.:_-----

Date: ____ _ 

Checked By: ____ _ 
Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

-8070it 

Shipping/Transportation Container Number: .---

Seaii.D. No. .Full Sjgrja\ure/. Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 

0806098 - 1 - M26N.Jil!"l1:"' s -~L£fi//V ff7£PG (j./f'Z- 200 ml 0.1N 

H2S04 I 

1<-0 B m1H20 

s 

B 

0806098 - 2 - M26AJ.II!11' s At.; ?ftl/<8 (~'Z- 200m!0.1N H2S04 I 

~ B m\H20 

s 

B 

0806098 - 3 • M26A/Jilt1'( s r~:4"tz_ i""'. 7/7t.JG 11>1.(.2- 200mi0.1N 

H2S04 I 

K.JJ B m!H20 

s 

B 

s 200 ml 0.1N 

0806098- 4 • M26NBH1 H2S04 I 

B m!H20 

s 

B 

s 200m! 0.1N 

0806098- BL • M26NBH1 H2S04 I 

B m!H20 

s 

B 

s 

B 

s 

B 

s 

B 

were all seals intact? __ Yes __ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were all liquid levels at markad levels? __ Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

(Method 26A.xls--Sample Record of Custody BH1) 7f1/2008 

13of22 
Method M26A Custody 

- Shippingffransportation Container Number:. ______ _ 

Seaii.D. no. AN fuH,Signature Date Time 

0806098 - 1 - M26NKO 

0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP1 

8 0\,. l 

0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP2 s . :.JIJ d~ 

0806098 - 1 - M26NIMP3 s 41. .f. d V1 

0806098 - 2 • M26NKO 

0806098 - 2 - M26NIMP1 

0806098 - 2 • M26NIMP2 

' 0806098 - 2 - M26NIMP3 

0806098 - 3 • M26NKO 

·rt 

0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP1 !~~ .~:JO 

0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP2 llo/UlJ~ 1 B: vO 

a nJ J' It • 

0806098 - 3 - M26NIMP3 

8 \. 

0806098 - 8L - M26A s 

8 -

Were all seals intact?_Yes __ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

-80704 

Reason for Breaking Final Vol. 

Seal ml 

{Q6 'f 

0D 

21.1 

Filter 

Number 

Were aU liquid levels at marked levels? __ Yes ___ .No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

(Method CTM027 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xls-Custody) 7/2/2008 

14 of 22 

Job Number:~~!!!. • . Date: 

Checked By: · 
Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

-8070-\ 

Shipping/Transportation Container Number: 

Seaii.D. No. Full Sianature Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 

080609A- 1 - M26N~ s '2~./CZ-v -tb~"' t1"<- I 200 ml 0.1N 

H2S04 I 

B mtH20 

s 

B 

080609A- 2 - M26~ s }~. 1/7/;:;6 rJ.<11 200mi0.1N 

H2S04 I 

B miH20 

s 

B 

:LL I 7(/(t b U<~l 080609A • 3- M26N~ s 200 mt 0.1N 

H2S04 I 

-11 b) B miH20 

s 

B 

080609A- 4- M26NBH1 s 200m! o.1N 

H2S04 I 

B miH20 

s 

B 

080609A- BL- M26NBH1 s 200 ml 0.1N 

H2S04 I 

B m1H20 

s 

B 

s 

B 

s 

B 

s 

B 

Were all seals intact? __ Yes __ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were all liquid levels at marked levels? __ Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

(Method 26A.xls-Sample Record of Custody BH 1 ) 1 {7/2008 

15 of 22 

Job Number:~ Done By I Date: ~I ;J'!> 

Final Check By I Date: "12 I 'l<i 
Method M26A Custody 

Shipping/Transportation Container Number: ______ _ 

Seaii.D. no. !lJ .Fui!Signature Date Time 

080609A - 1 - M26AIKO 

080609A -1- M26A/IMP1 s cr; 1 IJ. ~'WI~ rnof:. 

a lfl•' I , , 080609A - 1 - M26AIIMP2 

080609A - 1 - M26AIIMP3 s rLK " 

B /l 1/ I 

080609A - 2 - M26A!KO II-; {t('f@[tf) ll:; 

V'J?. I 3o 7 

080609A - 2 - M26A!IMP1 rl I r; 

080609A - 2 - M26A/IMP2 

-80704 

Reason for Breaking Final VoL 

Seal ml 

L)o 

Filter 

Number 

s' 'P I) I Ill-{ 

080609A -2- M26AIIMP3 

080609A - 3 - M26A!KO 

080609A - 3- M26AIIMP1 

080609A - 3 - M26AIIMP2 s :t Y1 

I I 

080609A - 3 - M26AIIMP3 

OB0609A - BL - M26A s f( M j/ 'YI 

B " I 

Were all· seals intact?_Yes __ No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were all liquid levels at marked levels? __ Yes __ ,No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

(Method CTM027 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.x!s..Custody) 7/2/2008 

16 of 22 

7'L 

Job Number: 

Date: ~Jt · 

Checked By: 'Er 
I SHIP TO: 

MIKE BARRY 

(919) 942-8607 

FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 

11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

UPS NEXT DAY AIR 

TRACKING#: 1Z FRS 740 014083 7262 1 

I BILLING: PIP 

W$ 10.0.47 Canon IP1700 78.0A 0412008 

Fold here em! place in Iobei pouch 

17 of22 
I FROM: 

TATE STRICKLER 

' (216) 525-0900 235 

AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 

5525 CANAL RD 

CLEVELAND OH 44125 -8070't 

I 

i SHIP TO: 

I MIKE BARRY 

(919) 942-8607 

FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 

11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

! UPS NEXT DAY AIR 

TRACKING#: 1Z FR8 740 01 4024 5053 1 

REF 1 

---------------------------------------------~------------- :080609 BILLING: P/P 

I WS 10.0.47 CeiiQn iP110078.0A OU2008 

L .. ----------------------------------------------------'---------------·-------------------------------------

Fotd here and place in tabel pouch 

18 of22 
www.erg.com 

June 17, 2008 

Requestor: Bryon Richwine 

P A Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

2575 Interstate Drive 

Harrisburg, PA 17101 

717-346-8252 

Dear Bryon Richwine: 

Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with 

two ampules of the following audit materials for a Method 26A HCI audit; Numbers M26A3756-03 and -04. These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley 

Plaut iu Summerville, P A and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner of Glen-Gery Corp., 

Hanley Plant in Summerville, P A per your automated database request. 

Please note: requests for Method 26A are now filled separately from requests for Method 

26 and that there are NEW Instructions associated with these samples, effective October 2003. 

Method26A 

request M26A-3756-03: 

-one Method 26A HCI sample; Sample No. L- 2728 

request M26A-3756-04: 

-one Method 26A HCI sample; Sample No. L- 2752 

Please note that each sample is individually labeled and shipped with an instruction sheet 

with the format for reporting the laboratory audit results. All results are to be reported to the 

internet automated computerized database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit samples along with the 

designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample 

according to the specifications of the Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit 

results are to be reported to you, the requestor, by the analyst, using the Reporting Form, in the 

units specified in the instructions. You then will use the automated database to enter the results 

into the SSAP database. 

We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit 

Program. If you have any questions regarding the samples, please contact either Thomas 

Mckenzie at (919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. 

Sincerely, 

Rick Lafleur 

CC: sent with samples 

601 Keystone Park 01·ive. Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 2.7560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919) 468-7803 

• Arlington. VA o Atlanta, GA • Austin, IX • Boston, MA o Chantilly, VA o Cincinnati, OH o Hershey, PA 

• Kansas City. KS o Lexington, MA • Nashua. NH • Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC " Sacramento, CA 

Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Papc<· 
NSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS 

OF MElliOD26AAUDIT SOLUTION 

-80704 

N!!El This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous sampl 

referred to as the acid sample or eydrg_g_~n halide_s fracti!lll. There is no filter included witt 

the audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No.4 a.Uillli!!e sample o 

hal.l!g.e.nu~ilm. 

lrhe ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that is 

~piked with a low concentration of chloride. 

I) Wrap a paper towel around the ampule, and with the ampule in the upright position, break off the 

op at the pre-scored mark by carefully exerting pressure sideways. 

~)Pipette exactly 1 OmL of the audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL volumetric flask. Dilut< 

exactly to the 500 mLmark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 

3) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 11.1 of Method 26A 

(N<lte; The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within the 

~alibrationrange ofthe analytical instrument. This decision is left to the analyst.) 

~)Calculate the concentration of chloride in the Diluted Sample in mg/L. 

5)Record the chloride concentration in the DilutedSampleon the enclosed Reporting Form in tmit 

pfmg/L. 

6) Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting Form 

o the designated agent. 

Revised 10103 

19of22 
Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI· Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-03/L2728 Date Issued: 

Auditee: 

Company: 

.. 80704 

06/17/08 

I ( '2-& g\ .... rn't'\J lr-.ee Vc· Cflt1~(t- HS1-L ;2 7§17 

B · {j.l"" j f Yo Phone: 4 J '1 'f'f 2.. ~ {p() 7 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results In mg/L) 

Analyte Result 

Chloride concentration 7.47 

Revised 10/03 

20 of22 
NSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS 

OF METHOD 26AAUDIT SOLUTION 

t'fu_w_; This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous sampl 

referred to as the acid sample or bsdf_p_gen balioos fmrthm. There is no filter included with 

he audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No. 4 alkllJine. sample o 

hJllo_geDu.ampkfmmou. 

The ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that is 

spiked with a low concentration of chloride. 

I) Wrap a paper towel around the ampule, and with the ampule in the upright position, break off the 

op at the pre-scored mark by carefully exerting pressure sideways. 

2) Pipette exactly 10 mL of the audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL volumetric flask. Dilute 

exactly to the 500 mL mark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 

3) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 11.1 of Method 26A 

(t'fu.te.: The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within the 

calibration range of the analytical instrument. This decision is left to the analyst.) 

4) Calculate the concentration of chloride in the Diluted Sample in mg!L. 

5) Record the chloride concentration in the Diluted Sample on the enclosed Reporting Form in unit 

bfmg!L. 

6) Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting Form 

o the designated agent. 

Revised 10103 

21 of 22 
Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-04/L2752 Date Issued: 

Auditee: 

Company: 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention ob. .. Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results in mg/L) 

Analyte Result 

Chloride concentration 7.11 

22 of 22 

06/17/08 

Revised 10!03 
www.erg.com 

June 17, 2008 

Requestor: Bryon Richwine 

P A Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

2575 Interstate Drive 

Harrisburg, PA 17101 

717-346-8252 

Dear Bryon Richwine: 

Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with 

ampules of audit materials for a Method 08 audit pair; Audit Numbers M08-3756-01a and -

01b. These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Gleu-Gery Corp., Hanley Plaut iu 

Summerville, P A and are being sent directly to Michael Rixuer of Gleu-Gery Corp., Hanley 

Plaut in Summerville, P A per your automated database request. 

Method 08 Sulfur Dioxide: 

request M08-3756-01a: 

one each Sulfuric Dioxide audit sample; Sample No. G- 0523 

Method 08 Sulfuric Acid Mist: 

request M08-3756-01b: 

-one each Sulfuric acid mist audit sample; Sample No. H- 0895 

Please note that each sample is shipped with an instruction sheet and a data form for 

listing the analytical audit information. All results are to be reported by the requestor to the 

internet automated computerized database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit sample along with the 

designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample 

according to the specifications of the Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit 

results are to be reported to you, the requestor in the units specified in the instructions. You then 

will use the automated database to enter the results into the SSAP database. 

We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit 

Program. If you have any questions concerning the audit, please contact either Thomas Mckenzie 

(919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. 

Sincerely, 

Rick 

12-~ Lafleur 

CC: sent with audit samples 

601 Keystone Pat-k Drive, Suite 700. Morrisville, NC 27560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919) 468-7803 

• Arlington, VA • Atlanta. GA • Austin, TX • Boston, MA • Chantilly. VA • Cincinnati. OH • Hershey, PA 

• Kansas City, KS • Lexington. MA • Nashua, NH • Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC • Sacramento. CA 

Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper 
Method 8 Audit Material 

(Sulfuric acid mist Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: MOB-3756-01 b/H0895 Date Issued: 06/17/08 

Auditee: 

Company: 

Address: 

Attention of: 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 2575 lnterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results in mg H2S04 / dscm) 

Analyte Result 

Sulfuric acid mist 

Revised 8/21/02 
Method 8 Audit Material 

(Sulfur Dioxide Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01 a/G0523 Date Issued: 06/17/08 

Auditee: 

Company: 

Address: 

' / 

Po @,me- 4-1!<26, c4/~L-narf, oH~ 44/4- I i 

Attention of: 7 ct!urrJ .C.fp 'II< hs Phone: 2 It- .5.2~- o1o 0 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 25751nterestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Project Name: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results in mg S02 / dscm) 

Analyte Result 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Revised 8/21/02 
TEST DATA 

DETAILED RESULTS 

H?so. Hoags 

N = Normality of barium perchlorate titrant Ba(CI04)2 for H2S04, (meq/ml) 0.00998 

Vt =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 titrant used for the H2S04 sample, (ml) 66.80 

Vtb =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 used for H2S04 Blank, (ml) 0.0500 

Vsoln =Total Volume of H2S04 Containing Solution (1000 ml's), (ml) - 250.0 I 

Va =Volume of H2S04 sample aliquot titrated (1 0 ml's), (ml) 100.0 I 

H2S04 Concentrations 

so? 

Sulfuric Acid Concentration, (mg/dscm) 

N = Normality of barium perchlorate titrant Ba(CI04)2 for S02, (meq/ml) I 

VI= Volume of Ba(CI04)2 titrant used for the S02 sample, (ml 

Vtb =Volume of Ba(CI04)2 used for S02 Blank, (ml 

Vsoln =Total Volume of S02 Containing Solution (1000 ml's), (ml 

Va =Volume of S02 sample aliquot titrated (10 ml's), (ml 

) 

) 

) 

) 

S02 Concentrations 

Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, (mg/dscm) 

Test Date: Page 1 

81.7 

G0523 

0.00998 

--~---- i 

12.35 I 

0.0500 

1000.0 

10.0 

393.2 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. -
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

TEST DATA 

Number of Test Runs 3 

Traverse Points[_ ___ ~ 

)I---

) •. 

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in 

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in 

Pilot Tube Coefficient (Cp 

Barometric Pressure at Ground Level (Pbar) (in Hg 

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft 

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft 

Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3 

) 

) -· ) 

) 

) .•.. 

) 

) 

) 

Run 1 

41.80 

41.70 

0.84 

28.90 

20.00 

28.00 

681.395 

741.830 

0.9988 - 2.016 

-~~· 

'"""~~ 

Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@ 

Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min 

Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the !mpingers (g 

Weight of Water Vapor Co!!ected in Silica Gel (g 

) ____ 

) ~~ {o6.5-

) 12.2 .. 

Average Pita! Rotation Angle Port Number 1 E·- 2.2j Port Number 2 ____ 6.:§ 

Run 2 Run 3 ..• 

41.80 4i:So 

41.70 41.70 ~~-·~ 

0.84 ···o.a4 

28.80 28.83 

20.0.()_ 20.00 

28.00 ·-··---- 28.00 

742.563i 804.668 

804.344 866.270 

0.9988 0.9988 

- 2,p1_~ • 2,016 

90 90 

103.5 107.2 

13.9 12.4 "··-· 

Test Run Start Time (hrmin)l 12:231- ---·-·-··~~-----,1ie9f':4;c8~~ Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) ---~·--14:~9. 18~ 21:33. 

DETAILED RESULTS 

Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 9.507 9.507 9.507 

Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 28.87 28.77 28.80 

Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mo!e) 28.84 28.82 28.83 

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 27.85 27.85 27.85 

Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 28.86 28.76 28.79 

·Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H20) -0.11 ·0.19 -0.18 

Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 373.8 377.4 376.2 

Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (

0

R) 833.8 837.4 836.2 

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ftlsec) 53.89 53.44 53.73 

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 3,233 3,206 3,224 

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 30,739 30.481 30,647 

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 18,779 18,472 18,620 

Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) {dscfm) 17,064 16,814 16,933 

Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas ('%H20) 9.13 8.98 9.06 

Test Results 

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) {dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.619 0.624 0.629 

Predicted 1~Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 37.125 37.421 37.738 

Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1~bw/100) 0.909 0.910 0.909 

Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H20) 0.5442 0.5317 0.5383 

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.7369 0.7277 0.7326 

Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H20) 1.4733 1.5792 1.6333 

Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 94.500 100.583 94.917 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) CR) 554.500 560.583 554.917 

Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) {acf) 60.435 61.781 61.602 

Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9969 1.0171 1.0313 

Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference(%) 0.19 -1.83 ·3.25 

SAMPLING QA 

Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 

Current Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK 

Probe Nozzle Diameter (in)( __ o.2s3r-·--·· 0.2521 0.253] 

Percent !sokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 98.7 101.8 101.1 

In Field lsokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD 

Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H20 0 0 0 

Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.005 1.005 1.005 

Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes I No) ? YES YES YES 

Average 

41.80 

41.70 

0.84 

28.84 

20.00 

28.00 

0.9988 

2.016 

90 

105.7 

12.8 

1.00 

16.78 

82.22 

Average 

9.507 

28.82 

28.83 

27.85 

28.80 

-0.16 

375.8 

835.8 

53.68 

3,221 

30,622 

18,624 

16,937 

9.06 

56.142 

0.624 

37.428 

0.909 

0.5381 

0.7324 

1.5619 

96.667 

556.667 

61.273 

1.0151 

-1.63 

0.020 

0.253 

100.6 

0 

1.005 

Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

Inlet Duct 

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, fnc. • 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS 

Run Pitot Delta 

Point Time P (in 

Count Run# (min) H20) -·-·· 1 1 0 0.62 

2 1 7.5 0.64 ·--· 3 1 

4 1 ~-

15 ~Q·~~ 22.5 0.54 --·· 5 1 30 0.51 

6 1 37.5 0.48 

7 1 

8 1 

45 o.~_g 

-~2.5 0.57 

9 1 60 0.51 -~ 

10 1 

11 1 

67.5 ---~~ 75 0.51 -- 12 1 82.5 0.46 -···· 

13 2 0 0.46 

14 2 7.5 0.6 

15 2 

16 2 

15 ····---=-= 

·--~~ 22.5 0.53 

17 2 

18 2 

19 2 

30 0.49 --;;;c··;:-;; 37.5 0.4y 

45 0.5 ---~ 

20 2 52.5 0.65 

21 2 60 0.55 

22 2 __ 67,5 0.52 

23 2 75 0.53 -~ 

24 2 

25 3 

82.5 

0 - -~ 0.58 •. 

26 3 7.5 0.61 --···· 27 3 15 0.53 

28 3 22.5 0.49 

29 3 30 ·~···~ 0.48 -~·· 

30 3 37.5 0.49 

31 3 45 0.55 

32 3 52.5 . ··~--;;-;;: 0.6 - 33 3 60 0.57 

34 3 

35 3 

36 3 

! 67.5 0.63 

I -·~:.-~t-- 0.49 

0.44 

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 

Square 

Root of 

Delta P 

0.787 

0.800 

0.762 

0.735 

0.714 

0.693 

0.748 

0.755 

0.714 

0.742 

0.714 

0.678 

0.678 

0.775 

0.806 

0.728 

0.700 

0.686 

0.707 

0.806 

0.742 

0.721 

0.728 

0.656 

0.762 

0.781 

0.728 

0.700 

0.693 

0.700 

0.742 

0.775 

0.755 

0.794 

0.700 

0.663 

Orifice 

Delta H 

(in H20) 

DGM 

Temp 

OUT ('F) ·-··-

1.67 89 ··-·-

1.73 91 

-~'57 93 

1.46 94 

1.38 94 

1.3 95 

1.51 94 

1.57 95 

1.38 96 

-~~-9.. 97 

1.38 98 ... 

1.24 98 ·----~ 

1.25 98 

1.62 99 

_.1:!.7. 101 

1.44 102 

1.33 103 

_1.36 103 

1.6 98 - 2.08 100 •. 

1.76 100 - 1.66 101 

1.7 101 

____ _1.38 101 

1.6 95 ·- 1.7 96 --· 1.5 97 

1.4· 97 -· 1.3 96 --·- 1.4 96 -

1.7 93 -· 1.9 94 " ----- 1.9 94 ·---~--

2.1 94 

1.6 94 

1.5 93 ----~----

Page 2 

Stack 

Pressure Stack 

(in H20) Temp ('F) ------ -0.121 375 

-0.12 369 .. -0.12 375 

-0.1 366 

-0.1 373 

-0.1 365 . -0.1 379 

-0.16 ·----~ 374 

-0.1 380 ... 

-0.11 374 

-0.14 -----:.;;-: 381 

-0.1 374 

-0.29 376 

-0.24 376 ---. -0.14 372 ~-·-----~·- -0.19 380 - -0.17 374 

-0.16 380 

-0.29 -----;,-;;- 386 

-0.15 378 

-0.19 368 

-0.18 379 

-0.18 384 . -0.1 376 ... -0.31, 349 

-0.23 379 

-0.24 385 . -0.17 379 

-0.14 ·---~ 384 

-0.18 377 

-0.17 381 

-0.16 375 

-0.14 381 

-0.12 352 -~~-

. 

--~:~1~=--~;~ 

Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

Inlet Duct 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

TEST DATA 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Particulate Weight in Probe Rinse (mg)rj----"1""7"'.4'"'0~1- 10.30j 17.80[ 

Particulate Weight in Filter Catch (mg)l 66.00[ 75.60[ 109.701 

DETAILED RESULTS 

Run 1 Run2 Run 3 

Emission Results 

Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.381 3.404 5.045 

Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf) 0.0231 0.0236 0.0348 

Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate at MDL (lb/hr) 0.168 0.164 0.164 

Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration at MDL (grains/dscf) 0.001 0.001 0.001 

Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

Inlet Duct 

Average 

15.17 

83.77 

Average 

3.943 

0.0272 

0.166 

0.001 

Test Date: 6/24/2008-612512008 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. · 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

TEST DATA 

OET AILED RESULTS 

Emission Results: 

LAB RESULTS HCL 

Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate {lb/hr) 

Run 1 

0.268 

14.275 

Run 2 

0.178 

10.957 

Run 3 

0.255 

15.042 

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Stack Gas Concentration 

LAB RESULTS HF 

HCI Volume of lmpinqer 1 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) 3160 f--~;::50~62:0:-1----if:.~Cj 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg Cl- 1 L) f---~0.~1;o20:<+ 0.100 +---~~ 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX} (mg Cl- I L) c_ __ ,o.~o~oo:!-L---"'o.;o.oo~o!-.L_ 

HCI Mass in lmpinger 1 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 0.38 0.51 

HCI Volume of Jmpinger 2 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) l---i.3S4;,oo:C·-1+·-·-_·_·_· ,;~:'cj---,C';';e:'cj 

HC! Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg C!-1 L) 0.100 

HCI Concentration of Blank (B>r) (mg C!- 1 L) ---o.ao·o 

HCI Mass in !mpinger 2 sample, (mHC!) (mg) 0.34 

HCI Volume of lmpinqer 3 Sample (VsHC!) (ml)f---~~l 580.0 ____ 11_~~~~ 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg Cl-I L) f--- ~f---~~f---~~ 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg Cl-I L) '---..O:C~'----7'~'----7'~ 

HC! Mass in lmpinger 3 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

0.13 0.10 

0.00 0.00 

0.08 0.13 

HC! Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

HCI Collection Efficiency(%) 

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 

HCI Concentration, dry basis (ConcHC!) (mg/dscm) 

HCI Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 

HCI Concentration (ppmvw) Wet@ 68F 

6.60 

98.86 

1.577 

4.19 

2.762 

2.510 

4.50 6.43 

100.00 100.00 

1.589 1.603 

2.83 4.01 

1.866 2.647 

1.699 2.407 

Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

HFVolume of Knock Out Sample {VsHF) (ml) 30300 23400 26600 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX-) (mg F- I L) ·-·-·-----~-_997 9.658 12.610 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg F-1 L) 0.000 ···---~00 0.000 ·---· .. ·-- HF Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHF) {mg) 302.90 226.00 335.43 

HF Volume of lmpinger 1 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 

HF Concentration of Sample, {SX-) (mg F- I L) 8.300 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg ~I L) _____ g.ooo 

HF Mass in lmpinger 1 sample, (mHF) (mg) 26.23 34.19 

HF Volume of !mpinger 2 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 3400 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX-) {mg F-I L) 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg F-/ L) 0.000 

HF Mass in lmpinger 2 sample, {mHF) (mg) 12.44 

HF Volume of lmpinqer 3 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 580.0 1320.0 1440.0 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX=) (mg F= I L) 

1

___ ·~-_!-~.28 __ _ _____ §.1. 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg F I L) __ _Q:_QQ_ 0.00 

HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) {mg) 10.60 7.41 

HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 352.17 276.52 380.14 

HCI Collection Efficiency(%) 96.99 98.01 98.05 

Stack Gas Concentration 

HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcH F) (mg/dscm) 223.33 173.97 237.15 

HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry@ 68F 268.516 209.166 285.132 

HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet@ 68F 243.994 190.390 259.300 

Glen Gery 

Celie Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

Inlet Duel 

Average 

0.233 

13.425 

Average 

26766.667 

0.185 

0.000 

3820.000 

0.107 

0.000 

3393.333 

0.100 

0.000 

1113.3 

0.1 

0.00 

0.12 

1.590 

3.68 

2.425 

2.205 

Average 

26766.667 

10.755 

0.000 

3820.000 

7.814 

0.000 

3393.333 

3.281 

0.000 

1113.3 

9.2 

0.00 

7.84 

211.48 

254.271 

231.228 

Test Date: 6124/2008- 6!25!2008 Page4 Air Compliance Testing, fnc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and 

Sample Calculations 

Constants 

co,F.,= 44.o 

0 2Fwt= 32.0 

CON2Fwt= 28.0 

H20Fwt= 18.0 

Stack Variables 

Cp = 

Pbar= 

Ebox = 

Esam = 

y= 

0= 

VIc= 

%C02= 

%02= 

%CO= 

%N2= 

A= 

Pg = 

Tsavg = 

SQ6.Pavg = 

<>H = 

Tm = 

Vm= 

Dn= 

Run No.- 1 

in wg= 0.073529 N02Fwt= 46.01 

COF.,= 28.01 

H2S04Fw1= 98.08 

Tstd= 528 

HCIF.,= 36.46 

S02Fwt= 64.06 

HF F.,= 20.01 

gr= 0.000142857 

mmBtu= 1000000 Btu 

CF.,= 12.011 Pstd= 29.92 

0.84 

28.90 in. Hg 

20 ft 

28ft 

0.9988 

90.0 min 

118.7 g 

1.00% 

17.00% 

0.00% 

82.00% 

9.5069 ft2 

~0.11 in. H20 

833.75 R 

0.74 in. wg 

1.47 in. wg 

554.50 R 

60.44 ft:,i 

0.253 in. 

pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless) 

barometric pressure 

elevation difference between ground level and meter box 

elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports 

gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless) 

net run time (minutes) 

total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) 

percent C02 by volume (dry basis) {dimensionless) 

percent 0 2 by volume {dry basis) (dimensionless) 

percent CO by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) 

percent N2 by volume (dry basis) {dimensionless) 

stack cross~sectionaf area 

flue gas static pressure 

average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg QF) 

average square root 6.P 

average pressure differential of orifice meter 

dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) 

volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) 

sampling nozzle diameter 

Calculated Stack Variables 

Barometric pressure at sampling location 

NOTE: Barome!rfc pressure recorded at ground level 

Psam = Pbar~ [{ Es~m/100ft}* 0.1 in. Hg] 

P,.m = 28.90 · ( ( 28.0/100) • 0.1) 

Psem = 28.87 in. Hg 

Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf) 

Vmsld = y*Vm * [ Pbar~ ( [ ( Eboxf100ft) *0.1 in. Hg] + (6.H/13.6)) /Pstdl * (Tmd/Tm) 

Glen Gery 

CericKIIn 

Uncontrolled 

Inlet Duct 

Vm"d = 0.9988 • 60.435 • ( ( 28.90 · ( ( 20.0/100) • 0.1 ) + ( 1.4733/13.6) ) /29.92) • ( 528.0/554.500) 

Vmstd = 55.688 ft' 

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 oF, scf) 

Vwstd = ( 0.04715 ft:5/g) *VIc 

Vwstd= (0.04715*118.7) 

Ywstd = 5.6 ft' 

Test Date: 6/24/2008- 6/25/2008 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609