alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
369306/1/WASHINGTON

American Airlines, Inc. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

1101 17th Street, N.W. 19300 International Boulevard

Washington, D.C. 20036 Seattle, Washington 98188

March 15, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Docket Operations and Media Management

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc. for Transfer

of International Route Authority, Dockets DOT-OST-2015-0025, DOT-OST-2005-

20406 and DOT-OST-2010-0222

Ladies and Gentlemen:

American Airlines, Inc. (“American”) and Alaska Airlines, Inc. (“Alaska”) submit

this brief response to the unauthorized surreply filed by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) on

March 13, 2015.1

Unlike Delta, American and Alaska do not wish to prolong this proceeding and

delay the Department of Transportation’s decision through the filing of unnecessary

pleadings. Our joint reply cites decades of precedent supporting prompt approval of the

pending transfer application, including the Horizon Air-San Juan Airlines route transfer

case which involved neither certificate authority nor an airline merger.2 Delta’s

references in its surreply are distinguishable and unavailing.

The Department has found repeatedly that market-based transactions involving

the sale of international route authority—such as this one—should be approved

promptly and without consideration of competing applications. American and Alaska

strongly urge the Department to apply these precedents, and approve their pending

application without further delay.

1

To the extent necessary, American and Alaska request leave to file this response, which will assist the

Department in acting promptly on their pending route transfer application.

2

Joint Reply of Alaska Airlines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc. to Answer of Delta Air Lines, Inc., March

6, 2015, p.5
Scanned by SimplyScan for Android
CASE NO. DA 22

- 0554
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CHERYL VOEGEL

,

Plaintiff / Appellant

,

- vs

DEVYN SALSBERY

,

Defendant / Appellee

. ORDER GRANTING
APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time,

there being no objection, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including March 8, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and s erve Appellee’s

Answer Brief.

Electronically dated and signed below.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 24 2023

01/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0554
# C_2004262EN.01000802.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 7 September 2004

in Case C-1/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles): criminal proceedings against Paul Van de Walle and Others and Texaco Belgium SA (1)

1

(Environment - Waste - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Meaning of ‘waste’, ‘producer of waste’ and ‘holder of waste’ - Soil infiltrated by leaked hydrocarbons - Independent operation of a service station belonging to a petroleum company)

(2004/C 262/16)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-1/03: Reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that court against Paul Van de Walle, Daniel Laurent, Thierry Mersch and Texaco Belgium SA, intervener: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

Hydrocarbons which are unintentionally spilled and cause soil and groundwater contamination are waste within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991. The same is true for soil contaminated by hydrocarbons, even if it has not been excavated. In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, the petroleum undertaking which supplied the service station can be considered to be the holder of that waste within the meaning of Article 1(c) of Directive 75/442 only if the leak from the service station's storage facilities which gave rise to the waste can be attributed to the conduct of that undertaking.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

1

---
# C_2005045EN.01001901.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/19

---

Removal from the register of Case C-50/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 45/35)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 9 November 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-50/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Rostok): 1. Simrad GmbH & Co, KG, 2. Kongsberg Simrad AS v Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur Macklenburg-Vorpommern.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.03.

1

---
# C_2004314EN.01000803.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/8

---

Action brought on 22 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-461/04)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(2004/C 314/17)

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly and R. Troosters, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC (1) of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof, or at least by failing to forward those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/55/EC (1) of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof, or at least by failing to forward those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period within which Directive 2001/55/EC had to be transposed expired on 31 December 2002.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 212 of 07.08.2001, pp. 12-23.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02471]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 23, 2014, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow 
Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, TF1, Paris, FRANCE; and Digital Media Centre, B.V., 
Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Chellomedia Direct Programing, B.V., Amsterdam, THE 
NETHERLANDS; Front Porch Digital, Louisville, CO; Red Bee Media, 
London, UNITED KINGDOM; Snell, Reading, Berkshire, UNITED KINGDOM; 
George Blood (individual member), Philadelphia, PA; Chris Dee 
(individual member), Babylon, NY; Stefan Riediger (individual member), 
Munich, GERMANY; and Robert Rutherford (individual member), Lidcombe, 
AUSTRALIA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes 
have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the 
group research project. Membership in this group research project 
remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
24, 2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 22, 2014 (79 FR 63168).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-02471 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 19th day of February, 2008.

CALVIN KANTONENCalvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer

















---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited  consolidated fiancial statements at February 28, 1997 and for the six
month perid ended February 28, 1997 is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.  Earnings per  share information has been restated to
conform with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003934
<NAME>                        Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          2,458,704
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,555,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                      233,058
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                9,567,703
<PP&E>                                         12,719,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,903,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,389,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,217,102
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           31,978
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,086,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,389,012
<SALES>                                        10,493,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,571,811
<CGS>                                           5,385,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,385,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,744,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   10,112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                298,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,058,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                      353,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               705,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      705,307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.22<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.22<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Represents  basic  earnings  per share in  accordance  with SAFAS No.  128,
     Earnings Per Share.
<F2> Represents  diluted  earnigns  per share in  accordance  with SFAS No. 128,
     Earnings Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00219-CV

__________________

DAVID P. ELLENT, PLLC, Appellant

VS.

TODD YOUNGBLOOD, WILLIAM FRIDLEY, PATRICK OGIDAN, 

STEPHAN FILLMAN, MARIA CHARRON, AND SHARON OGIDAN, 

Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20-08-09746-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant David P. Ellent, PLLC filed a motion to dismiss this accelerated 

appeal. This motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this 

Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM
2

Submitted on November 4, 2020

Opinion Delivered November 5, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 77 ) ll-K - (B ) -6 5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50AM Sheet 77 of 325P. 2 

# Pl irA 

# ~ O II-K-(B)-6 5

RESULT S FOR IFCA

M RUN S REQUESTE D B

YD . CARTER , DOE:EV . Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EE

A t o R . Short , EPA:SASD . Apri l 27 , 1981 , THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-6 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         387,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 355,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        203,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   355,729
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,965
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.39



                               XETEL CORPORATION
                           1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                ---------------


         The XeTel Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby
amended, effective April 20, 1998 as follows:

         1.  Section V.A. of Article One is hereby amended as follows:

         (i) The second sentence of such section is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

             "The maximum number of shares of Common Stock reserved for
         issuance over the term of the Plan shall not exceed 2,565,000 shares."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, XeTel Corporation has caused this plan amendment
to be executed on its behalf by its duly-authorized officer effective as of
April 20, 1998, subject to stockholder approval of the amendment at the 1998
Annual Stockholders Meeting.


                               XETEL CORPORATION


                               By:
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Angelo A. DeCaro, Jr.

                               Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005069EN.01001301.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 18 January 2005

in Case T-141/01 Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Financial participation in a demonstration project concerning the introduction of new cultivation techniques in sumac production - Cancellation of financial assistance from the fund)

(2005/C 69/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-141/01: Entorn, Societat Limitada Enginyeria i Serveis, established in Barcelona (Spain), represented by M. Belard-Kopke Marques-Pinto and C. Viñas Llebot, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: S. Pardo and L. Visaggio, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – action for annulment of Commission Decision C(1999) 534 of 4 March 1999 cancelling the financial assistance of the Guidance Section of the European Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) initially granted to the applicant by Decision C(93)3394 of 26 November 1993, in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 4256/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the EAGGF Guidance Section (OJ 1988 L 374, p. 25), for the financing of a demonstration project concerning the introduction of new cultivation techniques in sumac production (Project No 93.ES.06.030) – the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 18 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 13.10.2001.

1

---
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Philip
      McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
      Communications, Inc.








Date:
                May 11, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Philip M. McDermottName:
            Philip
                M. McDermottTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer