alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE COMPANY'S
GENERAL LEDGER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                9,176
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                1,586
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                      6,324
<TRADING-ASSETS>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          40,473
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      0
<LOANS>                             202,978
<ALLOWANCE>                          (1,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      270,192
<DEPOSITS>                          226,097
<SHORT-TERM>                              0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                  18,693
<LONG-TERM>                           5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              4,783
<OTHER-SE>                           15,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        270,192
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      11,960
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     1,973
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        240
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     14,173
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    6,762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    7,469
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 6,704
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           615
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       73
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       6,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,704
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            1,045
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         8.45
<LOANS-NON>                             508
<LOANS-PAST>                              0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                         22
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                       1,347
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      1,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           357
<RECOVERIES>                             58
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     1,316
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                  1,316
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   0
        

</TABLE>
INTER·COMPANY COMMUNICATION 

PERKIN-ELMEf~ 

Date: August 26, 1971 

8761-JS-135 

To: L. B. Molaskey 

From: J. P. Shanley 

( ~RO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

Subj: 1. 

'2. 

Discussion With Robert Fulton Concerning "Hook Shroud" Construction 

Telephone Conversation With Robert Fulton Regardin~ Quote (subject to 

later revision) on ''Hook Shroud". 

1. This vendor was selected to quote on the shroud bec'ause: 

a. he has made similar size light tight cloth bags fQr us (620-0070-401) 

b. he has demonstrated experience in sea recovery problems 

c. he is located in Danbury (on airport) 

The vendor meeting was attended by L. Waldeck (who procured previous bags), 

J. P. Shanley and Robert Fulton. M. Shaw of the Purchasing Department was unable 

to attend. 

The problem had been described in detail (via telephone conversation) to 

Mr. Fulton and he came prepared with sketches. 

It was stated that Robert Fulton Company would: 

1. provide their own minimum working sketches with direction to their 

shop and suppliers 

2. provide all material and hardware 

3. fabricate, assemble and paint unit 

4. demonstrate satisfactory operation in air 

5. crate unit for shipment 

Various methods of releasing the shroud were discussed. The choice of a 

method was left to Robert Fulton Company, .providing that it was "short stroke" 

and was accessable to the actuator. 

Operation in sea water was stressed. ,Wlth the exception of the shroud material, 

the choice of materials was left to Robert Fulton Company. 

2. Mr. Fulton telephoned to offer an ROM quote (subject to written confirmation) 

of $4625.00. 

JPS:ec 

CC: F. Johnson 

H. J. Haberland 

M. Shaw 

J. Canepari 

L. Waldeck 

W. Izzo 

B. Todd 0.0832·02 

. ...,
Exhibit 23.1
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  
    
    our auditors report dated March 23, 2009 on the consolidated balance sheets of Precision
Drilling Trust (the Trust) as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated statements
of earnings and deficit, comprehensive income and cash flow for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 23, 2009 on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008
   
 
 KPMG LLP, a Canadian owned limited liability partnership, is the Canadian
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss association
#### John E. Wood v. Richard Brownrigg *Ex’r.*

Under the act of 1816, *c*925,) a guardian is not authorised to recover compound interest, unless the ward can demand it of him.

Debt, upon a bond made by the defendant’s testator. payable to tfie plaintiff, as the guardian of a female in fant. The ward married before this action was brought, and the only question on the trial was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover compound interest, after the marriage. Swain, Judge, at Bertie, on the last Spring Circuit, ruled he was not, and judgment being entered accordingly, he appealed.

No counsel appeared for the plaintiff.

Iredell, for the defendant.

Ruffin, Judge.

The question arises on the construction of the act of 1816, *(Tien. c.*925,) and I think there cannot be a doubt as to the meaning of the act. It does not change the rate of interest by reason of any stipulation as to the rate, expressly introduced into the contract, so as to attach to it through all time and in all hands. But it only provides that all *guardians*may recover compound interest, on bonds pay able to them in that'capacity. Why? Because they are generally liable for such interest — when that liability ceases, that is, when the wardship is at an end, the interest returns to the ordinary legal standard, because it is then a common debt, and not one *431which the guardian is compelled to make, iri the discharge of his duty to keep money out. As long as the money is the property of a ward, compound interest accrues, and no longer; for then the lato ward; , or late guardian may get it in. This was said before in the caso of *Hooks*v. *Selers,*at December term, 1829, and substantially held in *Ryan*v. Blount. (1 *Eq. Rep.*382.)

Per Curiam. — Judgment appirmed.
# C_2005106EN.01000801.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 3 March 2005

in Case C-499/03 P: Peter Biegi Nahrungsmittel GmbH and Commonfood Handelsgesellschaft für Agrar-Produkte mbH v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Common Customs Tariff - Subsequent recovery of import duties - Waiver of duties to be recovered - Conditions - Article 220(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Error of the customs authorities - Detectable error - Combined nomenclature - Remarks - Scope)

(2005/C 106/14)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-499/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged at the Court on 25 November 2003 by Peter Biegi Nahrungsmittel GmbH, established in Frankfurt am Main (Germany) and Commonfood Handelsgesellschaft für Agrar-Produkte mbH, established in Langen (Germany) (laywers: K. Landry and L. Harings), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: X. Lewis and J. Schieferer) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 17 September 2003 in Joined Cases T-309/01 and T-239/02 Biegi Nahrungsmittel and Commonfood v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 17 September 2003 in Joined Cases T-309/01 and T-239/02 Biegi Nahrungsmittel and Commonfood v Commission;

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision C (2001) 2533 of 14 August 2001 (REC 4/00) in so far as it orders the subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties payable by Peter Biegi Nahrungsmittel GmbH in the amount of DEM 218 605,64; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision C (2001) 2533 of 14 August 2001 (REC 4/00) in so far as it orders the subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties payable by Peter Biegi Nahrungsmittel GmbH in the amount of DEM 218 605,64;

| 3. | Annuls Commission Decision C (2002) 857 of 5 March 2002 (REC 4/01) ordering the subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties payable by Commonfood Handelsgesellschaft für Agrar-Produkte mbH in the amount of DEM 222 116,06; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Annuls Commission Decision C (2002) 857 of 5 March 2002 (REC 4/01) ordering the subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties payable by Commonfood Handelsgesellschaft für Agrar-Produkte mbH in the amount of DEM 222 116,06;

| 4. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 21 of 24.01.2004.

1

---
# C_2004314EN.01001002.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/10

---

Action brought on 10 November 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-475/04)

(2004/C 314/21)

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 10 November 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Georgios Zavvos and Michael Shotter, Members of the Commission's Legal Service.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/58/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), or in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 31 July 2003.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 201 of 31.7.2002, p. 37.

1

---
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                                  PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of  Edison  Renewables,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul Steo, Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: August 13 2003                     By:   /s/ Paul Steo
                                            ---------------------
                                            Name: Paul Steo
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Oxisols

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Oxisols 

Oxisols are highly weathered soils of tropical and subtropical regions. They are dominated by low activity minerals, such as quartz, kaolinite, and iron oxides. They tend to have indistinct horizons.

The central concept of Oxisols is that of soils of the tropical and subtropical regions. They have gentle slopes on surfaces of great age. They are mixtures of quartz, kaolin, free oxides, and organic matter. For the most part they are nearly featureless soils without clearly marked horizons. Differences in properties with depth are so gradual that horizon boundaries are generally arbitrary.

## Dominant Suborders

### Aquox

Aquox are the wet Oxisols. They are rare in the United States and are known to occur only in Puerto Rico or in Hawaii. Curing many seed crops and storage of produce are difficult on these soils.

### Torrox

Torrox are the Oxisols of arid regions. Torrox are very rare in the United States.

### Udox

Udox are well drained Oxisols with a udic soil moisture regime. They are known to occur only in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam. They have a year-round growing season. The dry period is short enough for rainfed crops to be grown continuously in normal years.

### Ustox

Ustox are the Oxisols that have an ustic moisture regime. They are known to occur only in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam. They are moist long enough for one rain-fed crop. Crops are not grown continuously on these soils because there is inadequate moisture for at least 90 days in normal years.

Oxisols are only on tropical and subtropical islands. Most are infertile. The natural vegetation ranges from tropical rain forests to desert savannas.
I• 

! 

; . 

,,,urJif"·K· r· 1n Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111437 . hr tNFJl.,. · · • -- , · · r iU @a.\l~ ,. . . ' ' \ ·,. . 

16.July 1969 

RJ(NOLE. VIA SYEMAN. 

'CONTROL,S.YSTEM ONLY 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

. SUBJECT: 

-PRESENT: 

Minutes of the Me_eting of the 303 Commit tee,. 15 July 1969 

Mr. Kissinger, Mr.· Mitchell, Mr. Packard, Mr. Johnson, 

and Mr. Helms · " · · 

. Captain Merriwell W. Vineyard, USN,' was present for Item 1. 

Colonel Alexander Haig and Mr. William Trueheart were · 

present for the entire ~eeting. 

l. · Review of JRC and SAFSS July 1969 Reconnaissance Schedules in 

Connection with Forthcoming Presidential Trip to Southeast and 

South Asia and Romania 

a. The Committee agreed that the following missions, in addit.ion 

to those missions listed in the regular minute dated 16 July 1969, 

should be stood down during the period 25 July to 5 August 1969 because 

of the President's scheduled trip to Southeast and South Asia and 

Romania: 

(1) All SAFSS IDEALIST/TACKLE flights along the periphery 

of Communist China. 

(2) All SAC IDEALIST_ mis§!i1:ms in. the. Southeast Asia area. , ·-· ·-· ---_ ... _, ______ ......... __.........,_, __ ~····-·-.. -· ··~--~···---·---·· -·· ... 

b. The members discussed the possibility of standing down the 

OLD HEAD SAC IDEALIST program over Cuba but decided that these missions 

should continue as scheduled. 

2. ELINI' Reconnaissance of the Communist Chinese Developed 

Surface-Air-Missile (SAM) Radars (BYE 8905-69) 

After a brief discussion, the Committee decided to postpone 

decision on this proposal and reschedule it for consideration at 

a mid-August meeting following t_he President's return from his trip. 

Distribution 

Mr. Mitchell 

Mr. Packard 

Mr. Johnson. 

»>~~·--~Mr. Helms 

.,. 

. . . . . . . . 

__ ....., ___ /, 

Frank M, 

BYE 11,6 78-69A 

•iap!t &;: of f 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111437 

I.
# C_2004228EN.01003502.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-76/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 228/76)

By order of 10 May 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-76/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003.

1

---
# C_2005132EN.01002802.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/28

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 January 2005

in Case T-372/03 Yves Mahieu v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Time-limits for complaints and actions - Implied rejection of the complaint - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 132/51)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-372/03: Yves Mahieu, official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Auderghem (Belgium), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and H. Krämer, with an address for service in Luxembourg), — application for, firstly, the annulment of the decisions implicitly rejecting the claim brought by the applicant on 29 October 2002 against the decision of the Commission of 6 August 2002 rejecting his request made on the basis of Articles 24 and 90(1) of the Staff Regulations in connection with the mental harassment which he allegedly suffered and, secondly, damages — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 19 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 10.1.2004.

1

---
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Wetland Creation (Code 658) 

Wetland creation is the establishment of a wetland on a site

that was historically not a wetland. 

Practice Information 

Wetland creation applies to sites where no natural wetland

occurred historically. These sites contain soils that are not

hydric. 

The purpose of this practice is to create wetland functions

and values. Wetlands have been created to provide wildlife habitat for amphibians, migratory

waterfowl, and to mitigate for converted wetlands. 

The purposes, goals, and objectives of the creation must be clearly defined, including the appropriate

criteria for the site and purposes. The soil, hydrology, and vegetative characteristics existing on the

site and the contributing watershed must be documented. Native vegetative species should be used

whenever possible. Water levels can be controlled to prevent oxidation of organic soils and for

vegetation management. 

Operation and maintenance requirements will include operation of structural items such as water

control structures, periodic inspections with prompt repair or replacement of damaged components,

monitoring to ensure the continued success of the wetland, control of undesirable plant species and

pests, and in some cases the removal of accumulated sediment. 

Common Associated Practices 

Wetland Creation (658) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as Dike (356), Structure

for Water Control (587), Grade Stabilization Structure (410), Pond Sealing and Lining (521 A–D), and

Use Exclusion (472). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Washington - Fiscal Year 2024
'The build quality of the MAVRIK is the "best ever seen" I'm simply amazed! 

The MAVRIK will replace my Freefly Cinestar Hexa completely. Pure quality components, fits perfectly' 

Carsten Poulsen - w....w.zoomfoto.dk 

UNIQUE DESIGN FEATUREs 

ADVANCED 

AER~L TECHNOLOGy 

ADJUSTABLE RAIL SUPPORT GIMBAL 

The STEADIDRONE MAVRIK brings with it a new era of easy 

to use affordable drones you can fly with confidence. Whether it 

be work or play, the MAVRIK offers unique design features that 

make it a pleasure to operate everyday. Fully autonomous and 

intelligent, the MAVRIK allows for simple and effective capturing 

of aerial media, from the smoothest video filming to mapping 

and data acquisition, agriculture, search and rescue, waypoint 

mission planning and even 'follow me' features , the MAVRIK 

does it all and more, no longer do you need a different drone 

for every job, with the ability to now fly a huge variety of 

cameras and payloads with a single drone, get the job done 

quickly, reliably and save both time and money. 

What sets the MAVRIK apart from everything else available is 

our effective design, with features developed by aerial 

professionals, for aerial professionals, who need a practical, 

reliable drone they can easily travel with and fly everyday, able 

to focus on capturing the media needed rather than building 

and fussing with technical issues. 

EASY, RELIABLE GPS 

Intelligent, accurate, fully autonomous 

missions with waypoints, spline navigation, 

'follow me', return home and much more 

RAPID DEPLOY AIRFRAME