alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fude, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*November 7*

December *3, 1935.*

The cause was submitted for the plaintiff in error on the brief of /. *E. O’Brien*of Fond du Lac, and for the defendant in error on that of the *Attorney General, J. E. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, and *Alex Simpson,*dis*622trict attorney of Fond du Lac county, attorneys, and *T. L. Doyle*of Fond du Lac of counsel.

Fairchild,’J.

The testimony given by the complainant of acts of sexual intercourse with defendant is certain as to dates. It accounts for the birth of the child July 24, 1934, following a perfectly normal period of pregnancy.

The defendant bases his case upon the proposition that the evidence does not warrant a finding that he was the father beyond reasonable doubt. But the evidence does show that he was frequently in the company of the complainant, and that he did have sexual intercourse with her. Their intimate relations continued, according to the defendant's own admissions, up to and including August of 1933, and there is other evidence made to appear upon the cross-examination of the defendant which discloses an association extending considerably beyond the period of time necessary for the sexual intercourse to have matured exactly as it has in this instance. If there is any dispute, it is over the existence of acts occurring between August and October 15th or 22d, of the year 1933. The evidence is of such a nature as to clearly create a question of fact. The case was tried to the court. The evidence amply sustains the findings of the court below, and requires the affirming of judgment as there rendered on the question of the defendant’s guilt.

The conclusions of the trial court are amply sustained, not only by the evidence of the complainant, but by testimony of her mother as to conversations with the defendant, and by circumstances which were made to-appear from the examination óf’tíie defendant.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7622-7623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Cognition and Aging.
    Date: March 17, 2015.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201

[[Page 7623]]

Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Elaine Lewis, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-
9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48188858d8a818881938d97a48a8d85ca8a8d8cca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfdad3ded6d1dad3dac8d6ccffd1d6de91d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Aerobic Exercise and Muscle Function.
    Date: March 30, 2015.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Elaine Lewis, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-
9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dabfb6bbb3b4bfb6bfadb3a99ab4b3bbf4b4b3b2f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d18111c14131811180a140e3d13141c53131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02753 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

C.2 (+/-) Biodiversity

3. Woody biomass is chipped, burned 

or otherwise treated to enable planting 

or natural regeneration 

D.1 (+) Water, light, and 

nutrients made available 

2. Soil condition manipulated 

to improve survival of desired 

species

Tree/Shrub Site Preparation (490)

Initial setting: 1) Nonforested sites capable of 

producing wood fiber and forest habitat; or 2) 

cutover forestland. Both settings lack woody 

biomass of desired species, and desired 

species cannot be established without site 

modifications.

I.3 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters 

C.3 (+/-) Income 

stability (individuals 

and community)

Start

I.1 (+) Desired plant 

growth rate

C.6 (+) Related 

health of humans 

and animals; (-) 

associated costs

D.5 (-) Abundance of 

D.4 (+) Exposed soil large woody debris 

I.8 (+) Sheet and 

rill erosion and 

runoff of sediment 

and other 

contaminants

1. Competing vegetation 

controlled or eliminated

I.2 (-) Sheet and 

rill erosion, 

runoff, and 

sediment into 

surface waters

C.1 (+) Water 

quality in the 

watershed

I.7 (+) Release of carbon 

and greenhouse gases

C.4 (+/-) Air quality in the 

airshed

I.4 (-) 

Wildlife 

habitat

I.12 (+) Rate of 

decomposition 

C.5 (+) 

Soil 

quality

I.5 (+) Creation of habitat for desired species

I.6 (+) 

Carbon 

storage

D.3 (+) Application of 

herbicides and 

surfactants

I.11 (+) Organic 

matter in soil 

I.9 (+) 

Particulate 

matter 

D.2 (-) Plant species emitted

diversity

I.10 (+) 

Desired 

plant 

growth 

rate

Tree/Shrub Establishment (612)

Woody Residue Treatment (384)

Prescribed Burning (338)

Deep Tillage (324)

LEGEND

#. Created by 

practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with 

a plus (+) or minus (-). 

These symbols indicate 

only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect 

upon the resource, not 

whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

Critical Area Planting (342) 

Cover Crop (340) 

Forest Trails and Landings (655) 

Pest Management Conservation 

System (595)

Early Successional Habitat 

Development/Management (647) 

Restoration of Rare or Declining Natural 

Communities (643)

Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645)

Wildlife Habitat Planting (420)

Etc.
## COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

CI NDY C. F OSTER, Appellant,

v. FI DEL RENTERI A, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00180- CV

Appea l from the 388th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2009CM5945)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION This appea l is befor e the Court on its own motion to d et er m i n e whether it should be dismiss ed. Be cause Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the
appea l for wa

nt of prosec ution. On J uly 18, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant’s attorney that Appellant’s brief

was past due and that no motion for extension of time had been rec eived. The Clerk also informed counsel that the Court w ould dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution unless, within ten day s of the notice, she prese nted g rounds for continuing the appea l. To this date, there has been no response to the Clerk’s letter

. 1 

## This Court has the authority to dismiss an appea l for want of prosec ution when the appellant has failed to file her brief in the time presc ribed and g ives no rea sonable explanation for the failure
to do so. T E X


## . R. A P P


## . P. 38.8(a) (1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S.W .2d 61, 63 (Tex. App. – San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Ac cording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution.

O n J u l y 2 8 , 2 0 1 1 , t h e C o u r t r e c e i v e d f r o m A p p e l l a n t a c o p y o f a n a t t o r n e y g r i e v a n c e w i t h s u p p o r t i n g 1 d o c u m e n t a t i o n . T h e g r i e v a n c e w a s d i r e c t e d t o w a r d s h e r t r i a l c o u n s e l , n o t a p p e l l a t e c o u n s e l

. T h e d o c u m e n t a t i o n a l s o i n c l u d e s a g r i e v a n c e a g a i n s t t h e t r i a l j u d g e .

## GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice

Aug ust 17, 2011
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.
# C_2005006EN.01002501.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Belgian Cour de Cassation (1st Chamber) by decision of that court of 7 October 2004 in the case of Axel Kittel against Belgian State

st

(Case C-439/04)

(2005/C 6/47)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Belgian Cour de Cassation (Court of Cassation) (1st Chamber) of 7 October 2004, received at the Court Registry on 19 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Axel Kittel against the Belgian State on the following questions:

st

| 1. | Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax?

| 2. | Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself?

| 3. | Is the answer different where the unlawful basis of the contract of sale which renders it incurably void under domestic law is a fraudulent evasion of value added tax known to both parties to the contract? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the answer different where the unlawful basis of the contract of sale which renders it incurably void under domestic law is a fraudulent evasion of value added tax known to both parties to the contract?

---
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2006 11 14694.49727

2006 21 407786.9235

2006 31 130335.4416

2006 32 43542.79543

2006 41 469.8370962

2006 42 259.8546936

2006 43 3236.854043

2006 51 258.2605419

2006 52 14762.21929

2006 53 1595.419827

2006 54 3351.057452

2006 61 2885.41186

2006 62 3108.443931
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.38    
  


    
January 25, 2001 



Ms. Anna
Hall

Director of Business Development

Genentech, Inc.

1 DNA Way

South San Francisco

CA 94080-4990 


RE:    AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE INTERMUNE/GENENTECH LICENSE AGREEMENT


Dear
Ms. Hall: 


    Please
consider this document as Amendment No. 5 to that certain License Agreement for Interferon Gamma, dated May 5, 1998; as amended on December 26, 1998;
January 15, 1999; April 27, 1999; and June 23, 2000 (collectively, the "Agreement"), between INTERMUNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and  GENENTECH,
 INC. (collectively, the "Parties"). 



    1.  The Parties agree that the first sentence of Section 2.2(b) of the Agreement is hereby terminated in its
entirety and amended and superseded as follows: 




	"(b)
	Use
of the Mark. In using the Actimmune mark, InterMune shall display said mark with either the first letter in uppercase (i.e., Actimmune) or all letters in uppercase (i.e.,
ACTIMMUNE)." 





    2.  All other sections and exhibits of the Agreement remain unchanged. 


    3.  This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement is made effective as of January 25, 2001. 



    IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement as of the date set forth below. 



	INTERMUNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 	GENENTECH, INC.
	

By	
 	

/s/ JOHN J. WULF   
 John Wulf

Sr. Vice President of Corporate Development	
 	

By	
 	

/s/ JOSEPH S. MCCRACKEN   

	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Print Name	
 	

Joseph S. McCracken

	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Title	
 	

VP BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

	

Date	
 	

January 25, 2001
	
 	

Date	
 	

4/5/01












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.38
Exhibit 23.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (i) | Form S-8 No. 333-31911 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (formerly Sterile Recoveries, Inc.);
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | Form S-8 No. 333-67626 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc.;
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (iii) | Form S-8 No. 333-67618 pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc; and
| | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (iv) | Form S-8 No. 333-123616 pertaining to the 2004 Stock Compensation Plan of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our report dated February 18, 2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Certified Public Accountants



Tampa, Florida

March 24, 2005
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31090 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. CHARLES ELGIN STANLEY Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:01-CR-30013-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Stanley appeals from the district court’s revocation of his supervised release for failure to pay court-ordered restitution for child support payments. Stanley argues that the district court erred in revoking his supervised release because he is indigent. He further argues that the court’s revocation violates his right to Equal Protection under the Fifth Amendment.No. 04-31090 -2- The Government argues that, due to Stanley’s release and the fact that he is no longer subject to any further term of supervised release, Stanley’s appeal is moot. “Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987); see Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Because the record reflects that Stanley has been released and is not subject to any term of supervised release, there is no case or controversy for this court to address. Cf. , United States v. Gonzalez , 250 F.3d 923, 928 (5th Cir. 2001).
APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small 
Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
business Investment Company License No. 09/09-0406 issued to Pinecreek 
Capital Partners, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

    Dated: January 30, 2015.

United States Small Business Administration.
Javier E. Saade,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2015-02654 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, Maine Yankee Officials to Discuss Cable Separation Issues

----

----

I-97-86

July 16, 1997

**NRC, MAINE YANKEE OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS CABLE SEPARATION ISSUES**

The Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company's approach to resolving cable separation issues at the Maine Yankee nuclear power plant will be the subject of a management meeting between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and utility officials on Tuesday, July 22. Maine Yankee is located in Wiscasset, Maine.

Scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. in the public meeting room of the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa., the session will be open for public observation.

The proper separation of cables is important in nuclear power plants to ensure that if one or more set of cables is damaged, the plant will be able to achieve a safe shutdown.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2004135EN.01000201.xml

| 13.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 May 2004

(2004/C 135/02)

1 euro ==

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1857 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4415 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6697 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1698 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5411 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,03 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9461 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5862 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 32,098 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,654 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4253 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7674 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 471 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,73 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,242 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 810 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6976 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6471 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2483 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9372 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0335 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1091 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1857

JPY

Japanese yen

134,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4415

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6697

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1698

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5411

ISK

Iceland króna

88,03

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9461

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5862

CZK

Czech koruna

32,098

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvian lats

0,654

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4253

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7674

ROL

Romanian leu

40 471

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,73

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,242

TRL

Turkish lira

1 810 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6976

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6471

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2483

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9372

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0335

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,90

ZAR

South African rand

8,1091

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Haroldson, Appellant, vs. Berge and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Tom L. Yates*of Amery.

For the respondents : *Nelton & McGinnis*of Balsam Lake, attorneys, and *Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
*April 3, 1934.*

#### Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Respondent, vs. Brynwood Country Club and others, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Maurice Weinstein, Ben J. Miller,*and *James E. McCarthy,*attorneys, and *Ralph E. Kline*of counsel, all of .Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Upham, Black, Russell & Richardson,*attorneys, and *Clark M. Robertson*and *William E. Hanecy*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005006EN.01003502.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/35

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 September 2004

in Case T-394/02: Arnaldo Lucaccioni v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Pension - Garnishee order on salary - Enforcement of a judgment of a national court)

(2005/C 6/69)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-394/02: Arnaldo Lucaccioni, former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at St.-Leonards-On-Sea (United Kingdom), represented by J.R. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, with an address for service in Luxemburg) — First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision to proceed with a garnishee order on the applicant's pension following a judgment by an Italian court ordering the applicant to pay the fees of a doctor appointed by him to represent him before the disability committee and the medical committee and, second, application for reimbursement of certain expenses and fees and payment of damages — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar; has made an order on 29 September 2004, in which it:

| (1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Dismisses the action;

| (2) | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

1

---