alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005082EN.01000302.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 27 January 2005

in Case C-188/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Berlin): Irmtraud Junk v Wolfgang Kühnel (1)

1

(Directive 98/59/EC - Collective redundancies - Consultation with workers' representatives - Notification to the competent public authority - Concept of ‘redundancy’ - Time at which redundancy takes effect)

(2005/C 82/06)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-188/03, reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Arbeitsgericht (Labour Court) Berlin (Germany), made by decision of 30 April 2003, received at the Court on 7 May 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Irmtraud Junk and Wolfgang Kühnel – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Articles 2 to 4 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies must be construed as meaning that the event constituting redundancy consists in the declaration by an employer of his intention to terminate the contract of employment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Articles 2 to 4 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies must be construed as meaning that the event constituting redundancy consists in the declaration by an employer of his intention to terminate the contract of employment.

| 2. | An employer is entitled to carry out collective redundancies after the conclusion of the consultation procedure provided for in Article 2 of Directive 98/59 and after notification of the projected collective redundancies as provided for in Articles 3 and 4 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

2.

An employer is entitled to carry out collective redundancies after the conclusion of the consultation procedure provided for in Article 2 of Directive 98/59 and after notification of the projected collective redundancies as provided for in Articles 3 and 4 of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 06.09.2003.

1

---
# Animal Mortality Facility (No.) (316) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Animal Mortality Facility (No.) (316) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Animal Mortality Facility (No.) (316) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

**Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)**

316 NHCP CPS Animal Mortality Facility 2023(153.07 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

316 NHCP PO Animal Mortality Facility 2023(185.47 KB)

316 NHCP NED Animal Mortality Facility 2023(94.97 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Animal Mortality Facility

This video explores how Terry Small of Hector, AR, built an animal mortality facility on his poultry farm.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                 PRIDE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X




     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements for the six months ended May 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           may-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 12,675 
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,680,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            1,631,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 29,604,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                         4,934,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         37,402,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               2,838
<OTHER-SE>                                             10,595,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           7,657,844
<SALES>                                                37,402,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       8,255,602
<CGS>                                                  4,736,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          4,736,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       316,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     810,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (936,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (936,455)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (936,455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001004539
<NAME> AIRPLANES LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       46
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (17)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   239
<PP&E>                                           4,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              152
<BONDS>                                          3,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,076
<SALES>                                              1
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   121
<CGS>                                               (1)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       53
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (49)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (51)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (51)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

Sent: 0 5 / 07 /2012 0 2 :4 4 PM

To: Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

, Teresa Clemons/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RIN 2060

- AN72

Hi Penny,

We have concluded review of RIN 2060

- AN72, Petroleum Refineries

-- New Source Performance

Standards (NSPS)

-- Subparts J and Ja.

Please let me know me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
# C_2004262EN.01000301.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 9 September 2004

in Joined Cases C-184/02 and C-223/02: Kingdom of Spain and Republic of Finland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Directive 2002/15/CE - Organisation of the working time of road transport workers - Self-employed drivers - Legal basis - Freedom to pursue an occupation - Principle of equal treatment - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)

(2004/C 262/04)

Languages of the case: Spanish and Finnish

In Joined Cases C-184/02 and C-223/02: actions for annulment under Article 230 EC brought on 16 May and 12 June 2002, Kingdom of Spain (Agents: R. Silva de Lapuerta and subsequently N. Díaz Abad) in Case C-184/02 and Republic of Finland (Agent: T. Pynnä) in Case C-223/02 v European Parliament (Agents: M. Gómez-Leal and C. Pennera (C-184/02) and H. von Hertzen and G. Ricci (C-223/02)) and Council of the European Union (Agents: A. Lopes Sabino and G.-L. Ramos Ruano (C-184/02) and A. Lopes Sabino and H. Erno (C-223/02)), supported by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Castillo de la Torre and W. Wils (C-184/02) and M. Huttunen and W. Wils (C-223/02)) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), and K. Schiemann, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and pay those of the defendants; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and pay those of the defendants;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 169 of 13.7.2002.

1

OJ C 202 of 24.8.2002.

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

ft 286) ll-K- (I) 99 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:58 AM Sheet 286 of 325 
P.2 

cn 

II-K-(I)-99 

1990 PROJECTED NEW INDUSTRIAL FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED BOILER AIR EMISSIONS, 

FUEL DEMAND, AND COSTS (REFERENCE FUEL PRICES). 

EEA, Inc. 

November 26, 1985. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

IV-K-(I)-7.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


In connection with the Annual Report of PetroKazakhstan Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  June 17, 2004                 /s/ Bernard F. Isautier
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:   Bernard F. Isautier
                                     Title:  President & Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PetroKazakhstan Inc. and will be retained by PetroKazakhstan Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2004273EN.01002001.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 6 July 2004 in the case of Ipourgos Ikonomikon and Proistamenos D.O.I. Amfissas against Charilaos Georgakis

(Case C-391/04)

(2004/C 273/34)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 6 July 2004 received at the Court Registry on 14 September 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Ipourgos Ikonomikon and Proistamenos D.O.I. Amfissas against Charilaos Georgakis on the following question:

Where stock-market transactions agreed on in advance which result in the increase or artificial inflation of the price of the securities transferred are carried out between persons or groups of persons having one of the characteristics set out in Article 2(1) of Council Directive 89/592/EEC, (1) are the persons carrying out those transactions to be regarded as persons possessing inside information within the meaning of Articles 1 and 2 of that directive, so that their actions fall within the prohibition, laid down by Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the directive, on taking advantage of inside information?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 18.11.1989, p. 30.

1

---
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Channel Bed Stabilization (Code 584) 

Channel bed stabilization is accomplished by installing one

or more structural measures to stabilize the bed or bottom

of a channel. 

Practice Information 

Erosion and deposition are naturally occurring stream

processes that together are essential to the health of the

stream. The stream is considered to be healthy when there

is a balance of the two processes. 

Channel bed stabilization is applied when an imbalance in a stream system causes damage to the

bed of an existing or newly constructed channel. This practice can be disruptive to the aquatic

environment of the stream and should be selected only if the problem cannot be solved another way.

In most cases, the channel bed stabilization is paired with another practice such as NRCS

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Code 580). 

Before a bed stabilization practice is installed, conduct a thorough investigation of the cause of the

problem. Identify the possible solutions and the potential effect that each one could have both

upstream and downstream. 

Elements to consider include the changes in erosion and deposition patterns, the improvements or

damage to aquatic habitat during construction and over the life of the practice, and the potential safety

risks to boaters or swimmers. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 10 years. Operation and maintenance of a channel bed

stabilization measure will consist of conducting periodic inspections and repairing or replacing

damaged components. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS CPS Channel Bed Stabilization (Code 584) is commonly associated with NRCS CPSs

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Code 580), Clearing and Snagging (Code 326), and Open

Channel (Code 582). 

For more information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 New Mexico - Fiscal Year 2024
THINK NEW IDEAS, INC.
                      8000 Sunset Boulevard, Penthouse East
                          Los Angeles, California 90046

                                  July 30, 1997



Mr. James Grannan
Vice President
THINK New Ideas, Inc.
500 Bishop Street, Suite 5A
Atlanta, Georgia  30305

      Re:  Amendment To Employment Agreement Dated June 30, 1996
           -----------------------------------------------------

Dear Jim:

      Reference is hereby made to that certain employment  agreement dated as of
June 30, 1996 (the "Employment  Agreement")  between THINK New Ideas,  Inc. (the
"Corporation")  and James Grannan (the  "Employee").  This letter is intended to
confirm  that,  notwithstanding  anything  else to the contrary set forth in the
Employment  Agreement,  the  Corporation  and the Employee hereby agree that the
Period of Employment,  as that term is defined in the Employment  Agreement,  be
and hereby is extended for a period of one (1) year from June 30,  1997,  and is
subject to renewal as specified in the Employment Agreement. In consideration of
the Employee's agreement to extend the Period of Employment as set forth herein,
the Corporation has agreed to grant the Employee a bonus of $15,000 payable upon
Employee's counter-execution hereof.

      Except as otherwise  expressly  modified  hereby or required to effectuate
the  modification  set forth  herein,  the  Employment  Agreement  shall  remain
unchanged  and shall  continue  in full force and effect  pursuant  to the terms
thereof.

      This  letter  agreement   contains  the  entire   agreement   between  the
Corporation  and the  Employee  with  respect to the  modification  which is the
subject hereof. This letter agreement may not be amended,  changed,  modified or
discharged,  nor may any provision hereof be waived,  except by an instrument in
writing  executed by or on behalf of the party against whom  enforcement  of any
amendment,  waiver,  change,  modification or discharge is sought.  No course of
conduct or dealing shall be construed to modify,  amend or otherwise  effect any
of the provisions hereof.

      Please confirm that the Employee is in agreement  with the foregoing,  and
that the  foregoing  is in  accordance  with your  understanding  by signing and
returning this letter, which shall thereupon constitute a binding agreement.

Agreed to and accepted as of this
31st day of July, 1997:                             Very truly yours,

THE EMPLOYEE                                        THINK NEW IDEAS, INC.


By:  /s/ James Grannan                              By: /s/ Scott  A. Mednick
     -------------------------                          ------------------------
      James Grannan                                     Scott A. Mednick
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
# C_2004300EN.01002001.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-193/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Stuttgart): Betriebskrankenkasse der Robert Bosch GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)

1

(Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses incurred in another Member State - Article 34 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 - Health insurance fund applying a simplified full reimbursement procedure for bills for small amounts)

(2004/C 300/40)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-193/03: Betriebskrankenkasse der Robert Bosch GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland — reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Sozialgericht Stuttgart (Germany), made by decision of 19 March 2003, received at the Court on 9 May 2003 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and S. von Bahr, Judges; Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro, Registrar: R. Grass, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 34 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1399/1999 of 29 April 1999, is to be interpreted as not precluding a practice whereby a health insurance fund, in the application of national rules, reimburses medical costs incurred by its members during a stay in another Member State in full when those costs do not exceed DEM 200.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23.8.2003.

1

---