alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1998              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         513,750                 513,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  715,909                 715,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,330,335               1,330,335
<PP&E>                                       1,817,527               1,817,527
<DEPRECIATION>                               (764,025)               (764,025)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,487,746               3,487,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          343,670                 343,670
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,584,663               9,584,663
<COMMON>                                       150,464                 150,464
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,591,051)             (6,591,051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,847,746               3,847,746
<SALES>                                        427,884               1,079,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,884               1,079,836
<CGS>                                           56,250                 168,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,731,607              12,501,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (325,720)               (401,161)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,978,003)            (11,020,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,978,003)            (11,020,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,978,003)            (11,202,912)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)                  (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)                  (1.63)
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL, AND SCOT SPENCER

DOCKET NO. DOT-OST-1995-272

(Enforcement Proceeding)

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

In view of the impending prospective lapse in FY2014 appropricitions funding

government operations as of September 30, 2013, the Department has directed that all employees

in the Office of Hearings be furloughed in the event of such a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of

such a lapse, the Office of Hearings will close on Tuesday, October I, 2013, for the duration of

the shutdown.

Any deadline, whether set by regulation or previous order, is suspended and extended for

the duration of the shutdown. .

SO ORDERED.

Ronnie A. Yoder

Chief Administrative Law Jud e

Attachment - Service List
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272

UPDATED SERVICE LIST

Scot Spencer, Respondent

c/o Andrew Moll, Attorney for Scot Spencer

Public Defender Office

County of San Bernardino

303 West 3rd Street, Ground Floor

San Bernardino, CA 92415

TEL: 909-382-7639

Scot Spencer, Respondent

SBD Aircraft Services

255 South Leland Norton Way

San Bernardino, CA 92408

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder,

Chi~f Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of Hearings, M-20

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EII-310)

Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366-2142

FAX: 202-366-7536

Samuel Podberesky & Vinh Q. Nguyen,

Enforcement Counsel

Office of Aviation Enforcement and

Proceedings, Room W96-322

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366-9342

FAX: 202-366-7152

Rosalind A. Knapp, Deputy General Counsel

Office of General Counsel, Room W92-312

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366-4713

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                        39
<INVENTORY>                                      1,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,546
<SALES>                                         39,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,854
<CGS>                                           26,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (142)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,835
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2187 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 

certain retirement plan contributions picked up by governmental employers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. 

KUSTOFF of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the treatment of certain retirement plan contributions 

picked up by governmental employers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

4 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS PICKED 

5 UP BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘For purposes of paragraph 

9 (1)’’ and inserting the following: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2187 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para2 graph (1)’’, and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF ELECTIONS BE6 TWEEN ALTERNATIVE BENEFIT FORMULAS.— 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

8 subparagraph (A), a contribution shall not 

9 fail to be treated as picked up by an em10 ploying unit merely because the employee 

11 may make an irrevocable election between 

12 the application of two alternative benefit 

13 formulas involving the same or different 

14 levels of employee contributions. 

15 ‘‘(ii) APPLICATION TO EXISTING EM16 PLOYEES.—Clause (i) shall be applied 

17 without regard to whether the employee is 

18 already covered by one of the benefit for19 mulas referred to therein.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to years ending after the date of 

22 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors:
Profile Technologies, Inc.


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-53575) on Form S-3 of Profile Technologies, Inc. of our report dated
October 10, 2003 relating to the balance sheet of Profile Technologies, Inc. as
of June 30, 2003, and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
June 30, 2003, which report appears in the June 30, 2003 annual report on Form
10-KSB of Profile Technologies, Inc.

     Our report dated October 10, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has incurred net losses since inception and has a
working capital deficit at June 30, 2003 that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                               /s/ KPMG LLP
                                               ------------
                                               KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
October 10, 2003





                                       49
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 22

The subsidiaries of ATSI Communications, Inc. are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         State or Other Company                                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
         ----------------------                                        -----------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
ATSI Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. ("ATSI-COM")                                  Mexico
American TeleSource International, Inc.                                         Canada
American TeleSource International, Inc.                                         Texas
American TeleSource International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico
GlobalSCAPE, Inc.                                                               Delaware
Sistema de Telefonia Computarizada, S.A. de C.V. ("Computel")                   Mexico
Servicios de Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. ("Sinfra")                           Mexico
TeleSpan, Inc. ("TeleSpan")                                                     Texas
ATSI de CentroAmerica, S.A.                                                     Costa Rica
</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
----

Action brought on 4 March 2005 by the Italian Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-110/05)

(2005/C 115/56)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 4 March 2005 by the Italian Republic, represented by Giacomo Aiello, Avvocato dello Stato.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Government of the Italian Republic has challenged before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities Commission Regulation (EC) No 2102/2004 of 9 December 2004 on certain exceptional market support measures for eggs in Italy, (1) insofar as it does not lay down exceptional measures to support the market in poultrymeat within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 (2) with regard to chicks destroyed owing to the fact that breeding is impossible in areas affected by avian influenza and subject to veterinary restrictions on circulation.

In support of its claims, the Italian Republic has pleaded:

Finally, the applicant pleads infringement of the obligation to give reasons for measures.

----

(1)OJ L 365 of 10.12.2004, p. 10.

(2)OJ L 282 of 01.11.1975, p. 77.

----
# C_2005094EN.01000601.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/6

---

DECISION

DECISION

(2005/C 94/07)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities as established by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 and last amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004, and in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

Having regard to the Bureau decision on the determination of appointing authorities, last amended on 26 October 2004,

Having regard to open competitions

| | PE/84/A, PE/88/A, PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A; |
| --- | --- |

PE/84/A, PE/88/A, PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A;

| | EUR/A/128, EUR/A/147, EUR/A/149, EUR/A/151, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/A/128, EUR/A/147, EUR/A/149, EUR/A/151, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169;

| | EUR/LA/91, EUR/LA/101, EUR/LA/133, EUR/LA/134, EUR/LA/138, EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/LA/91, EUR/LA/101, EUR/LA/133, EUR/LA/134, EUR/LA/138, EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157;

| | PE/30/B, PE/32/B; |
| --- | --- |

PE/30/B, PE/32/B;

| | EUR/B/141, EUR/B/142; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/B/141, EUR/B/142;

| | PE/121/C, PE/131/C, PE/132/C; |
| --- | --- |

PE/121/C, PE/131/C, PE/132/C;

| | EUR/C/124, EUR/C/135, EUR/C/153, EUR/C/160, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/C/124, EUR/C/135, EUR/C/153, EUR/C/160,

Having regard to the opinion delivered by the Joint Committee at its meeting of 15 December 2004,

DECIDES:

Article 1

The period of validity of the reserve lists for open competitions

| | PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A; |
| --- | --- |

PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A;

| | EUR/A/147, EUR/A/149, EUR/A/151, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/A/147, EUR/A/149, EUR/A/151, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169;

| | EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157;

| | PE/30/B, PE/32/B; |
| --- | --- |

PE/30/B, PE/32/B;

| | PE/121/C, PE/131/C, PE/132/C; |
| --- | --- |

PE/121/C, PE/131/C, PE/132/C;

| | EUR/C/124, EUR/C/153, EUR/C/160, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/C/124, EUR/C/153, EUR/C/160,

is extended until 31 December 2005.

Article 2

The period of validity of the reserve list for open competition

| | EUR/C/135 |
| --- | --- |

EUR/C/135

is extended until 30 April 2005.

Article 3

The period of validity of the reserve lists for open competitions

| | PE/84/A, PE/88/A; |
| --- | --- |

PE/84/A, PE/88/A;

| | EUR/A/128; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/A/128;

| | EUR/LA/91, EUR/LA/101, EUR/LA/133, EUR/LA/134, EUR/LA/138; |
| --- | --- |

EUR/LA/91, EUR/LA/101, EUR/LA/133, EUR/LA/134, EUR/LA/138;

| | EUR/B/141, EUR/B/142, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/B/141, EUR/B/142,

is not extended.

Luxembourg, 20 December 2004.

Julian PRIESTLEY

---
### Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = EWR

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 07:50:11



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 07:50:11

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 54

ABX ABX AIR 2

ACA AIR CANADA 24

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 4

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 1

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 882

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 32

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

EVA EVA AIRLINES 2

FDX FED EX 9

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 27

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 32

POE PORTER AIRLINES 14

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 8

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 3

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 10

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Integrated Pest Management, Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control, Nutrient Management, Obstruction Removal, Subsurface Drain, Terrace, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 North Dakota - Fiscal Year 2024
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1650

# The United States of America National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety: Eighth National Report, October 2019 (NUREG-1650, Revision 7)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1650, Revision 7, October 2019 (PDF – 2.66 MB)
        - Supplement 1, "Answers to Questions From the Peer Review By Contracting Parties on the United States of America Eighth National Report For the Convention on Nuclear Safety," February 2024 (PDF – 1.86 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: August 2019**Date Published**: October 2019

**Prepared by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has prepared Revision 7 to NUREG-1650, "The United States of America Eighth National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety," for submission for peer review at the eighth review meeting of the Convention on Nuclear Safety, to be convened at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria, in March 2020. This report addresses the safety of land-based commercial nuclear power plants in the United States (U.S.). It demonstrates how the U.S. Government achieves and maintains a high level of nuclear safety worldwide by enhancing national measures and international cooperation and by meeting the obligations of all the articles established by the Convention. These articles address the safety of existing nuclear installations, the legislative and regulatory framework, the regulatory body, responsibility of the licensee, the priority given to safety, financial and human resources, human factors, quality assurance, assessment and verification of safety, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, siting, design and construction, and operation. This report also addresses the principles of the Vienna Declaration adopted by the contracting parties in February 2015.

Similar to the U.S. National Report issued in 2016, this revised document includes a section developed by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations describing work that the U.S. nuclear industry has done to ensure safety. The primary responsibility for the safety of a nuclear installation rests with the license holder; therefore, Part 3 explains how the nuclear industry maintains and improves nuclear safety.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 05, 2024