alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 60551 Summary Calendar

**____________ Jose Luis Santoya Lara,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus
**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

**______________________________** Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A075 894 005

**______________________________** Before **Higginbotham, Jones,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Jose Luis Santoya Lara, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen. The denial was based on the BIA’s conclusion that Santoya Lara had not shown prima facie eligibility for adjustment of status because he did not warrant the favorable exercise of discretion that is a

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-60551 Document: 62-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2024No. 23

- 60551

2 necessary component of this form of relief

. See Parada

- Orellana v. Garland , 21 F.4th 887, 893 (5th Cir. 2022) ; 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). The Respondent moves to dismiss for want of jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B). The Respondent is correct insofar as he asserts that the jurisdiction

stripping provision of § 1252(a)(2)(B) applies here. See Parada

- Orellana , 21 F.4th at 891

- 9 5

. Additionally, Santoya Lara’s argument that the BIA erred by not properly considering his favorable considerations and focusing on the negative factors in his case is not a legal argument that this court may review under § 1252(a)(2)(D) but instead is a challenge to a discretionary decision that may not be reviewed under § 1252(a)(2)(B). Carreo n v. Garland , 71 F.4th 247, 254

- 55 (5th Cir. 2023)

. The motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction is **GRANTED** , and t he petition for review is **DISMISSED** for want of jurisdiction. Case: 23-60551 Document: 62-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small business Investment Company License No. 03/73-0208 issued to Liberty Ventures I, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

Dated: January 9, 2015.

United States Small Business Administration.

Javier E. Saade,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2015-02648 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2005006EN.01002101.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 22 June 2004

in Case C-151/03 P: Karl L. Meyer against the Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for damages - Compensation for losses suffered due to maladministration by the Commission - Application of the decisions relating to the association of the OCTs)

(2005/C 6/40)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-151/03P: Karl L. Meyer, residing at Uturoa (Island of Raiatea, French Polynesia) (lawyer: J.-D. des Arcis) the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M.-J. Jonczy and M.B. Martenczuk) – appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Third Chamber) of 13 February 2003 in Case T-333/01 Meyer v Commission [2003] ECR II-117, asking for that judgment to be set aside – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of J. N. Cunha-Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur) and K. Schiemann, Judges; Advocate General: A. Tizzano, Registrar: R. Grass, has given an order on 22 June 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Mr Meyer to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Mr Meyer to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# User's Manual for FIRIN: A Computer Code to Estimate Accidental Fire and Airborne Releases in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities (NUREG/CR-3037, PNL-4532)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3037 (PDF - 7.23 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1989**Date Published:**February 1989

**Prepared by:** M.K. Chan, M.Y. Ballinger, P.C. Owczarski Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Operated by Batelle Memorial Institute 

**Prepared for:** Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety  Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

 NRC FIN B-2481

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has sponsored a research program to better estimate the source term, or amount and characteristics of radioactive material made airborne, from several types of accidents. The most concentrated work has been done on fires, resulting in the development of FIRIN, a compartment fire code that estimates the release and distribution of radioactive materials within a room from fires involving radioactive materials.

This manual describes the technical bases and use of the computer code FIRIN. This code was developed to estimate the source term release of smoke and radioactive particles from potential fires in nuclear fuel cycle facilities. FIRIN is a product of a broader study, Fuel Cycle Accident Analysis, which Pacific Northwest Laboratory conducted for the NRC.

The technical bases of FIRIN consist of a nonradioactive fire source term model, compartment effects modeling, and radioactive source term models. These three elements interact with each other in the code affecting the course of the fire.

This report also serves as a complete FIRIN user's manual. Included are the FIRIN code description with methods/algorithms of calculation and subroutines, code operating instructions with input requirements, and output descriptions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# C_2004300EN.01003703.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/37

---

Removal from the register of Case C-256/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 300/73)

By order of 25 August 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-256/03: Commission of the European Communities v Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 du 2.8.2003.

1

---
# C_2004228EN.01001901.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/19

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 10 June 2004

in Case C-555/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Charleroi): Magali Warbecq v Ryanair Ltd (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Court or tribunal having the power under Article 68 EC to request the Court to give a preliminary ruling - Court lacking jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling)

(2004/C 228/36)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-555/03: reference to the Court under Article 68 EC by the Tribunal du travail de Chareleroi (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Magali Warbecq and Ryanair Ltd — on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann and E. Juhász, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 10 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunal du travail de Charleroi (Belgium) by judgment of 15 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40713 Conference Calendar

VERNON KING, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus T. H. WARREN, Etc., ET AL., Defendants, T. H. WARREN, CAPTAIN, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MICHAEL A. WILSON, WARDEN, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; D. K. BEVINS, WARDEN, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; F. M. TURNER, NURSE, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; D. L. HAYES, COMMANDING OFFICER, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY;; S. STEVEN SUB COUNSEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY; D. CARROLL, SUB COUNSEL, MICHAEL UNIT INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-389

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In a prior appeal, this court determined that Texas prisoner Vernon King, Jr., No. 590316, is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995No. 97-40713 -2- (PLRA) because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, King has brought an action or appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous. King v. Walker , No. 97-40830 (5th Cir. February 10, 1998); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, King’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED. He may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED. King has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Ragauskas, Respondent, vs. Balcaitus, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Racine county dated April 27, 1927: E. R. Burgess, Judge.

Alienation of wife’s affections. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *Beck, Smith & Heft*of Racine.

For the respondent: *Baumblatt & Weisman*of Racine.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Proposals for Inhibiting 
Transcription Factors in Hematologic Malignancies Therapy.
    Date: March 6, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7196, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Stephanie J Webb, Ph.D. Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0291 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a696e7f6a727b74737f346d7f78785a747372347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abd8dfcedbc3cac5c2ce85dccec9c9ebc5c2c385ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS).

    Dated: February 6, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02880 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 178 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious workers 

to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant 

religious workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Worker Visa 

5 Reciprocity Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING RECIPROCAL IMMIGRATION TREAT7 MENT. 

8 Section 204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following: 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 178 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) Beginning on October 1, 2017, no petition may 

2 be approved for classification of an alien as a special immi3 grant under section 101(a)(27)(C) if the Secretary of 

4 Homeland Security has determined that the country of the 

5 alien’s nationality— 

6 ‘‘(I) is identified as a ‘Country of Particular 

7 Concern’ or a country where religious freedom is of 

8 significant interest in the 2013 International Reli9 gious Freedom Report; or 

10 ‘‘(II) does not extend reciprocal immigration 

11 treatment to nationals of the United States who are 

12 seeking resident status in order to work in a reli13 gious vocation or occupation.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00015

- CV

Eric PASANISI and Tanga nyika Wildlife Safari, Ltd.,

Appellants

v.

Mark VANHAM and Klineburger Vanham International Hunting Consultants, LLC.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 08521

Honorable Laura Salinas , Judge Pre siding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED.

Appellants’ brief is due on or before April 21, 2021

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of th e said

court on this 12th day of April, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
The Honorable Jim Turner

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515-3217

Dear Congressman Turner:

Thank you for your letter of June 9, 2000 concerning the possible regulation of

concrete, its residuals or by-products as hazardous wastes under the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

First, in general, concrete products, when used for their normal purpose, are not

regulated wastes under RCRA, which governs management of wastes. (The only

exception to this would be concrete that was produced using hazardous waste as an

ingredient.) Second, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has no plans to

develop new regulations which would classify concrete residuals or by-products as

hazardous wastes. We are currently evaluating how the existing RCRA regulations

apply to the materials that you mention, particularly the concrete wash water from

mixer trucks. This requires a careful consideration of various aspects of our regulations

and the implications for similar wastes.

We are encouraged by the initial efforts of the concrete and cement industry to

increase the reuse of concrete wash water as a substitute for fresh water. Also, as you

point out, EPA and state agencies have worked closely with the industry on

environmental training programs. We will continue our dialog with industry

associations and representatives as well as other interested parties as we consider the

applicability of RCRA to the specific activities about which you are concerned.

Thank you for your interest in this matter. If you have any questions, please

have your staff contact Robert Maxey of my staff at 703-308-7273.

 

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director

Office of Solid Waste 

 RO 14451
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

GREGORY E. THOMPSON

, § No. 425 , 2014

§

Respondent Below, § Court Below:

Appellant, §

§ Family Court of the

§ State of Delaware, in and for

v. § Kent County

§

D IVISION OF FAMILY § File No . 12

- 10

- 1 T K

SERVICES, §

§ Petition No. 12

- 32909

Petitioner Below, §

Appellee. §

§

Submitted: April 22 , 2015

Decided: April 23, 2015

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23 rd day of Apr il 2015 , the Court, having considered this matter

on the briefs of the parties, and having concluded that the same should be

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Family Court in its

Order of July 9 , 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED t hat the judgment

of the Family Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihur a

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             379
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,059
<PP&E>                                          16,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,154
<SALES>                                         34,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,518
<CGS>                                           21,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (49)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.16)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.F.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                           EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION
                              STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR
                             NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

         Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the El Paso Energy Corporation Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated effective as of January
20, 1999 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective February
7, 2001:

         WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation of El Paso Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was amended to change the name of the
corporation to El Paso Corporation effective February 7, 2001.

         NOW THEREFORE, the name of the Plan is hereby changed to the "El Paso
Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors" and all references in
the Plan to "El Paso Energy Corporation" or the "Company" shall mean "El Paso
Corporation."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 7th day of February 2001.


                                       EL PASO CORPORATION

                                       By:      /s/ Joel Richards III
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Human Resources and Administration


Attest:

    /s/ David L. Siddall
------------------------------
    Corporate Secretary