alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004227EN.01000502.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3493 — YAMANOUCHI/FUJISAWA)

(2004/C 227/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3493. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3493. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2177 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to change the residency requirements 

for certain officials serving in the District of Columbia, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to change the residency requirements for certain officials serving in the 

District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Federal Officials Residency Equality Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2177 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN OFFI2 CIALS SERVING IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUM3 BIA. 

4 (a) DISTRICT JUDGES.—Section 134 of title 28, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (b)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘the District of Columbia, 

8 the Southern District of New York, and’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘the Southern District of New York 

10 and’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘for which he’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘for which he or she’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘his’’ each 

14 place it appears and inserting ‘‘his or her’’. 

15 (b) UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS.—Section 545(a) of 

16 title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the 

17 first sentence and inserting ‘‘Each United States attorney 

18 shall reside in the district for which he or she is appointed, 

19 except that those officers of the Southern District of New 

20 York and the Eastern District of New York may reside 

21 within 20 miles thereof.’’. 

22 (c) UNITED STATES MARSHALS.—Section 561(e)(1) 

23 of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as 

24 follows: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2177 IH

1 ‘‘(1) the marshal for the Southern District of 

2 New York may reside within 20 miles of the district; 

3 and’’. 

4 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall take effect on the date that is one year 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2005019EN.01001101.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the First Chamber of the Tribunal administratif de Caen, by judgment of that court dated 5 October 2004, in the case of Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Flers-Argentan against Directeur des services fiscaux, Dircofi Ouest

(Case C-458/04)

(2005/C 19/22)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of First Chamber of the Tribunal administratif de Caen (Caen Administrative Court) dated 5 October 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 29 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Flers-Argentan (Flers-Argentan Chamber of Commerce and Industry) against Directeur des services fiscaux (Head of the Fiscal Authorities), Dircofi Ouest.

The First Chamber of the Tribunal administratif de Caen asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the question whether internal financial transfers constitute subsidies within the meaning of Article 19 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 (1) for the purposes of the calculation of the deductible proportion.

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Georges
Benarroch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Osprey Gold Corp.., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the periods presented therein.

Date: November 15, 2006


                                        By: /s/ Georges Benarroch
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Georges Benarroch
                                            Acting President & Chief Executive
                                            Officer And Acting Chief Financial
                                            Officer


                                       22
# CA2004285EN.01004901.xml

| 23.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 285/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 285/49

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/LA/10/03

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/LA/10/03

HEADS OF LINGUISTIC DIVISION IN THE TRANSLATION SERVICES (CAREER  BRACKET LA 3)

HEADS OF LINGUISTIC DIVISION IN THE TRANSLATION SERVICES (CAREER  BRACKET LA 3)

(2004/C 285 A/04)

1.   General specialisation

Czech language

| FRANKOVA (POKORNA) | Marketa |
| --- | --- |
| HRDLICKA | Petr |
| HRUSKA | Karel |

FRANKOVA (POKORNA)

Marketa

HRDLICKA

Petr

HRUSKA

Karel

Estonian language

| ILJA (MALKOV) | Merit-Ene |
| --- | --- |
| NAKKURT | Sirje |

ILJA (MALKOV)

Merit-Ene

NAKKURT

Sirje

Lithuanian language

| TICHONOVA | Viktorija |
| --- | --- |

TICHONOVA

Viktorija

Latvian language

| KRASTINS | Uldis |
| --- | --- |
| STRAUTINA | Ineta |

KRASTINS

Uldis

STRAUTINA

Ineta

Maltese language

| SALIBA | Paul Joseph |
| --- | --- |

SALIBA

Paul Joseph

Polish language

| CHMIEL | Dariusz |
| --- | --- |
| TREL (SOBIEGRAJ) | Wieslawa |
| WISNIEWSKA-CRAVEN-GREEN | Izabela |
| ZACZYKIEWICZ | Jaroslaw |
| ZAGOROWICZ | Klaudia |

CHMIEL

Dariusz

TREL (SOBIEGRAJ)

Wieslawa

WISNIEWSKA-CRAVEN-GREEN

Izabela

ZACZYKIEWICZ

Jaroslaw

ZAGOROWICZ

Klaudia

Slovenian language

| MAVRIC | Valter |
| --- | --- |
| RANT | Anica |

MAVRIC

Valter

RANT

Anica

Slovakian language

| KRATKA (PAVLOVSKA) | Eva |
| --- | --- |
| TVAROZEK | Pavol |

KRATKA (PAVLOVSKA)

Eva

TVAROZEK

Pavol

2.   Legal specialisation

Czech language

| SMEJKAL | Martin |
| --- | --- |

SMEJKAL

Martin

Polish language

| CYGAN | Marta |
| --- | --- |

CYGAN

Marta

The lists will be valid until 31 December 2005 and may be extended.

31 December 2005

---

(1)  At a candidate's request, his/her name will not be published.:

1

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry G. SILVERSTEIN, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 470, Docket 29538.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 29, 1965.

Decided May 11, 1965.

Stephen Chamas, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, and Laurence Vogel, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

Jules Ritholz, New York City (Boris Kostelanetz and Raymond Rubin, Cor-coran, Kostelanetz & Gladstone, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which directed Harry G. Silver-stein to comply with an Internal Revenue summons and to produce the book and records of two real estate syndicates, Model City B Associates and Model City C Associates. We agree with the reasons stated by Judge Bryan in his opinion, reported at 237 F.Supp. 446 (1965). As Judge Bryan pointed out, the real estate syndicates here involved are very similar to the real estate syndicates involved in the earlier case of United States v. Silverstein, 210 F.Supp. 401 (1962), aff’d by us, 314 F.2d 789, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 807, 83 S.Ct. 1696, 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963), where Judge Tyler directed this same respondent to produce the records of those syndicates.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of SRI.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 10, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Gerald
Woodard  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that,
to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Wallace D.
Ruiz                        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Wallace D. Ruiz                               
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7531-7532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Secretary of Veterans Affairs Advisory Committee Chairs Summit; 
Retraction of Published Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) previously gave notice in 
80 FR 3015 under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 
that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs will would host an open meeting, 
``Secretary of Veterans Affairs Advisory Committee Chairs Summit,'' on 
March 13, 2015, at the Department of Veterans Affairs

[[Page 7532]]

Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
    VA is retracting the notice because the meeting will not be open to 
the public. The scope and size of the meeting have been scaled back 
significantly, to be only a briefing by the Secretary regarding the 
MyVA initiative. The Secretary will not seek advice or recommendations 
regarding VA policy from the group of attendees.
    Members of the public who have questions about this change may 
contact Jeffrey Moragne, Director, Advisory Committee Management Office 
(00AC), at (202) 266-4660.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
Rebecca Schiller,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-02659 Filed 2-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
*May 9, 1933.*

#### Ziolkowski, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Valley Electric Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Genrich & Genrich,*attorneys, and *L. A. Pradt, Jr.*of counsel, all of Wausau.

For the respondent: *W. E. Atwell*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
# C_2005069EN.01001402.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 12 January 2005

in Case T-334/03: Deutsche Post EURO EXPRESS GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - EUROPREMIUM - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 69/27)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-334/03: Deutsche Post EURO EXPRESS GmbH, represented initially by G. Lindhofer and subsequently by K.-U. Jonas, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: initially by U. Pfleghar and G. Schneider and subsequently by A. von Mühlendahl and G. Schneider) — action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 June 2003 (Case R 348/2002-4) regarding registration of the sign EUROPREMIUM as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and O. Czúcz, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 January 2005, in which it:

Deutsche Post EURO EXPRESS GmbH,

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 June 2003 (Case R 348/2002-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 June 2003 (Case R 348/2002-4);

| 2. | Orders the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the defendant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
# C_2004217EN.01001201.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven by judgment of 28 May 2004 in the case of Transport Maatschappij Traffic B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

(Case C-247/04)

(2004/C 217/22)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of 28 May 2004 of the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court for Trade and Industry), which was received at the Court Registry on 11 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Transport Maatschappij Traffic B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken on the following question:

‘Must the term “legally owed” in Article 236 of the Community Customs Code (the CCC) (1) be understood as referring exclusively to the question whether the conditions for the incurrence of a customs debt, as set out in Chapter 2 of Title VII of the CCC, are fulfilled or can legal indebtedness arise only if there are no grounds, including grounds under the national provisions in force as specified in Article 4(23) of the CCC, for challenging the notification that duties are owed?’

1

---

(1)  OJ L 302 of 13.10.1992, p. 1.

1

---
#### Spier Whitaker v. John B. Cawthorne.

An unsealed memorandum given by the owner of land, stating that A is the owner of a house upon the premises, and authorizing its removal, is a mere license to enter, and is revoked by a subsequent conveyance to B.

Trespass qjjare ceausum eregtt, and upon *not guilty*pleaded, on the trial before DaNIEE, Judge, at Warren, on the last Spring Circuit, the case was, that one *Robert Ransom,*in the year 1826, bought the premises in dispute of one *Robert R. Johnson,*from whom, he received an absolute deed, and to whom he gave the following memorandum, which was without a seal: “I *“ Robert. Ransom*agree that the stable next, &c. which *“*belongs to *Robert Johnson,*may be removed at any *“*time he pleases, which stable was reserved by said *“ Johnson,*in his sale, &c.” The plaintiff claimed under an absolute deed from *R. Ransom*to *James Ransom,*and the defendant under a sale of the stable from *Johnson’s*administrators. The trespass consisted of an entry by the defendant, and the removal of the stable.

The jury under the direction of his Honor, returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

*Devereux,*for the defendant,

cited *Van Rensalaer*v. *Van Rensalaer,*(9 *John. R.*377.) *Taylor*v. *Waters,*(2 *Eng. C. L. R.*140.) *Tillotson*v. *Preston, (7 John. R.*285.)

*Badger, contra.*

*390Daniel, Judge,

after stating the case, proceeded: The word “ land, legally includeth all castles, houses and other buildings, so as passing the land or ground, the structure or building thereupon passeth therewith.” (1 *Thomas’ Coke.*197.) “ If a man grant all his lands, he grants thereby all his mines of metal, and other fossils, his woods, liis waters,- and his houses, as well as his fields and meadows.” (2 *Bl. Com.*18.) The word “land,” includes not only the face of the earth, but every thing under it or over it. The stable was fixed to the land, and was in law a part of it. It could not be, nor was it severed by the unsealed writing which *Ransom*gave to *Johnson.*It remained as part of the land, and passed under the deed to *James Ransom,*and again it passed with the land, by the deed to the plaintiff. The written license given by *Ransom,*might have excused a trespass committed in entering and taking the stable, whilst he was the owner of the premises. It did not operate as a conveyance of the stable; for the stable being a part of the realty, could not pass, except by such a conveyance as would pass the land. A license to commit a trespass, is a very different thing from a conveyance which will pass the land, or any of its appurtenances. When *Ransom*sold the land, the stable passed, and the license to enter was revoked, it was not incorporated in the deed to Ransom, and it was therefore, as to his *bargainee,*a nullity.

Per Curiam. — Judgment afeiemed:
| 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By     | /s/ Antonio Estrada Jr.                                      |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Antonio Estrada Jr.                                          |   |
|   | Sr. Vice President of Finance & Corporate Controller and |   |
|   | Principal Financial Officer                                  |   |
|   | October 31, 2011                                             |   |

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-31911) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Planof SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (formerly Sterile Recoveries, Inc.) of our report dated February 18, 2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 26, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Osprey Gold Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
2003, has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Douglas A. Budden, Principal Executive and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Douglas A. Budden
    -----------------------
Name:  Douglas A. Budden
     ---------------------
Principal Executive and Principal Accounting Officer
May 20, 2003




<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      23.3**




January
      12, 2007




El
      Capitan Precious Metals Inc.


Suite
      216


14301
      N.
      87th Street


Scottsdale,
      AZ 85260




Gentlemen:




The
      undersigned hereby consents to the reference to the undersigned in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “Annual Report”), including without limitation
      references in Item 2 of the Annual Report, to be filed with the United States
      Securities and Exchange Commission.




I
      also
      confirm that I have read each of the references to me in the Annual Report
      and
      concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
      admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by
      Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Sincerely,/s/ Richard
              DanieleRichard
              Daniele