alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004202EN.01001801.xml

| 10.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/18

---

Corrigendum to the standing invitation to tender for Commission Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 on the sale of butter at reduced prices and the granting of aid for butter and concentrated butter for use in the manufacture of pastry products, ice-cream and other foodstuffs and for Commission Regulation (EC) No 429/90 on the granting of aid for concentrated butter intended for direct consumption in the Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 132 of 8 May 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 132 of 8 May 2004

(2004/C 202/09)

On page 2, details concerning the Danish, Cypriot, Lithuanian and Hungarian intervention agencies shall read as follows:

| Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri |
| --- |
| Direktoratet for FødevareErhverv, Animalsk Kontor |
| Nyropsgade 30 |
| DK-1780 København V |
| Tlf. (45) 33 95 80 00 |
| Fax (45) 33 95 80 34 |

Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri

Direktoratet for FødevareErhverv, Animalsk Kontor

Nyropsgade 30

DK-1780 København V

Tlf. (45) 33 95 80 00

Fax (45) 33 95 80 34

| Cyprus Milk Industry Organisation |
| --- |
| 6 Amfipoleos street |
| P.O. Box 22 418 |
| CY-1521 Nicosia |
| Tel: (357) 22 74 80 00 |
| Fax: (357) 22 74 82 61 |

Cyprus Milk Industry Organisation

6 Amfipoleos street

P.O. Box 22 418

CY-1521 Nicosia

Tel: (357) 22 74 80 00

Fax: (357) 22 74 82 61

| Lietuvos žemės ūkio ir maisto produktų rinkos reguliavimo agentūra |
| --- |
| L. Stuokos-Gucevičiaus g. Nr. 9 |
| LT-01122 Vilnius |
| Tel: (370-5) 268 50 50 |
| Fax: (370-5) 268 50 61 |
| E-mail: info@litfood.lt |

Lietuvos žemės ūkio ir maisto produktų rinkos reguliavimo agentūra

L. Stuokos-Gucevičiaus g. Nr. 9

LT-01122 Vilnius

Tel: (370-5) 268 50 50

Fax: (370-5) 268 50 61

E-mail: info@litfood.lt

| Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (MVH) |
| --- |
| Alkotmány u. 29 |
| 1385 Budapest 62. Pf. 867. |
| Tel: (36-1) 37 43 600; (36-1) 47 52 100 |
| Fax: (36-1) 47 52 169 |
| E-mail: ugyfelszolgalat@aik.hu |

Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (MVH)

Alkotmány u. 29

1385 Budapest 62. Pf. 867.

Tel: (36-1) 37 43 600; (36-1) 47 52 100

Fax: (36-1) 47 52 169

E-mail: ugyfelszolgalat@aik.hu

---
*June 6, 1933.*

#### Otto, Appellant, vs. The Journal Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *John W. McMillan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Miller, Mack & Fairchild*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
# C_2004273EN.01001303.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Austria, by decision of that court of 12 August 2004 in the case of (1) Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich GmbH, (2) Planai-Hochwurzen-Bahnen GmbH, (3) Gerlitzen-Kanzelbahn-Touristik Gesellschaft mbH & CO KG, against (1) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol, (2) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Steiermark, and (3) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten

(Case C-368/04)

(2004/C 273/26)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Higher Administrative Court) (Austria) of 12 August 2004, received at the Court Registry on 24 August 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of (1) Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich GmbH, (2) Planai-Hochwurzen-Bahnen GmbH, and (3) Gerlitzen-Kanzelbahn-Touristik Gesellschaft mbH & CO KG, against (1) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol, (2) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Steiermark and (3) the Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten, on the following questions:

| 1. | Does the prohibition on putting measures into effect under Article 88(3) EC preclude the application of a national legal provision which excludes businesses whose activity is not shown to consist primarily in the manufacture of goods from energy tax rebates and which must therefore be classified as aid within the meaning of Article 87 EC, but which was not notified to the Commission prior to the national entry into force of the rules, even where the Commission has found the measure to be compatible with the common market under Article 87(3) EC for a period in the past and the application for reimbursement relates to taxes payable for that period? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the prohibition on putting measures into effect under Article 88(3) EC preclude the application of a national legal provision which excludes businesses whose activity is not shown to consist primarily in the manufacture of goods from energy tax rebates and which must therefore be classified as aid within the meaning of Article 87 EC, but which was not notified to the Commission prior to the national entry into force of the rules, even where the Commission has found the measure to be compatible with the common market under Article 87(3) EC for a period in the past and the application for reimbursement relates to taxes payable for that period?

| 2. | If so,
  in such a case does the prohibition on putting measures into effect require a rebate even in cases where the applications were made by service businesses after the adoption of the Commission's decision for assessment periods prior to that date? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so,

in such a case does the prohibition on putting measures into effect require a rebate even in cases where the applications were made by service businesses after the adoption of the Commission's decision for assessment periods prior to that date?

---
*February 13, 1940.*

#### Strassburg, Respondent, vs. Strassburg and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Puhr & Van de Water*of Sheboygan.

For the respondent: *Runge & Davey*of Sheboygan.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
*October 11, 1927.*

#### Piccurio, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Cianciolo, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county dated April 3, 1926: Gustave G. Gehrz, Judge.

Personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *Cannon & Waldron*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Dennis M. Sullivan, Jr.,*and *Eugene J. Sullivan,*attorneys, and *John J. Hiirley,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FMB Equibanc, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer'sknowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Dated March 29, 2004                                                          By:

                                                                                                /s/ Dwayne E. Rocker                                                                                                                Dwayne E. Rocker                                                                                            Secretary                                                                                                (Principal financial and accounting officer)
#### Mautz and another, Respondents, vs. Bagley and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Bagley, Spohn, Ross & Stevens*of Madison.

For the respondents: *Olin & Butler*and *Clifford G. Mathys,*all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004313EN.01000201.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3641 — BT/INFONET)

(2004/C 313/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 13 December 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking British Telecommunications plc (‘BT’, United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Infonet Services Corporation (‘Infonet’, USA) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 13 December 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking British Telecommunications plc (‘BT’, United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Infonet Services Corporation (‘Infonet’, USA) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for undertaking BT: a provider of telecommunications services, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for undertaking BT: a provider of telecommunications services,

| — | for undertaking Infonet: a provider of telecommunications services. |
| --- | --- |

—

for undertaking Infonet: a provider of telecommunications services.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3641 — BT/INFONET, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3641 — BT/INFONET, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 6094)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, February 18, 2015, 12:00 p.m. to February 18, 2015, 5:00 p.m., Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 20015 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 13, 2015, 80 FR 8, page 1647.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the location to the Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 20015. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated:  January 29, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02091 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                                                                                

                 AMERITRUCK DISTRIBUTION CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                        
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)



                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                            -------------------
                                                              1998*      1997*
                                                              ----       ----

Earnings:
 Loss before income taxes and extraordinary items           $(6,643)   $(2,920)
                                                            -------    -------
 
Fixed charges:
 Interest expense and amortization of debt discount 
  and premium on all indebtedness                             6,034      4,494
 
 Portion of rent under long-term operating leases 
  representative of an interest factor                        1,429        683
 
 Redeemable preferred stock dividend requirements                55          -
                                                             -------    -------
     Total fixed charges                                      7,518       5,177
                                                             -------    -------
 
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges               $   875    $ 2,257
                                                             =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)                             -          -
                                                             =======    =======
 

(1)  The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $6,643
     and $2,920 for the three months ended March 31, 1998 and 1997,
     respectively.



 *   Comparisons between periods are affected by acquisitions see Note 2
     contained in the unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
From: Angus Crane <acrane@naima.org> 

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 08/02/2011 03:30 PM 

Subject: NAIMA Documentation on Conversion to Non-Formaldehyde Binder and Possible Meeting

Dates

Dear Susan, 

 

Please find attached NAIMA’s letter and documentation setting forth the fiber glass industry’s 

conversion to non-formaldehyde binders. 

 

I greatly appreciate your willingness to meet with NAIMA. The week of August 8, 2011 did not work for 

my members, but I can offer you three dates during the week of August 29th – Tuesday, August 30th; 

Wednesday August 31st; or the first half of the day on Thursday, September 1st . Please tell me if any 

of these dates will work. I assume we will meet with you in Research Triangle Park. If you can give me a 

date, I will notify my members so they can make travel arrangements. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Angus E. Crane 

 

Angus E. Crane 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association 

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123 

Fax: (703) 684-0427 

 

Visit NAIMA online at: 

www.NAIMA.org 

www.PipeInsulation.org

Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted 

material is not available in Regulations.gov since 

it may not be reproduced without consent of the 

copyright holder. 

Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA 

Docket Center, Public Reading Room. 

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW 

Room 3334 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: 202-566-1744 

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 12, 2015, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Open Platform for NVF Project, Inc. (“Open Platform for NVF Project”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Array Networks, Inc., Milpitas, CA; ENEA Software AB, Kista, SWEDEN; KT, Seongnam City, GyeongGi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Midokura USA Inc., San Francisco, CA; Sonus Networks, Westford, MA; Xilinx, Inc., San Jose, CA; and ZTE Corporation, Shenzhen PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Open Platform for NVF Project intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 17, 2014, Open Platform for NVF Project filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 14, 2014 (79 FR 68301).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-02360 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Wille, Appellant, vs. Kahl, Respondent.

For the appellant: /. /. *McManamy*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Christianson & Roick*of Madison.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA R E c E, v ED 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEB ~· - OFFICE OF HEARINGS 0 6 20!7 

WASHINGTON, D.C. H 

' EARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of: 

William A. Curtright 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1319 

FAA Case No. 2014NM090046 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY 

To: Judge Sullivan and Respondent: 

Notice is hereby given that counsel will be unavailable the following dates in 2017: April!!, 

12, 17, 18; May 22 through June 8, inclusive; July 11 through July 21, inclusive; September 21, 22; 

October 5,6,12,13, inclusive; for the complainant in the above-captioned case. It is respectfully 

requested that no hearings be scheduled during this period. 

David F. Shayne 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

Email: david.f.shavne@faa.gov 

Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) 

(425) 227-2165 (direct) 

(425) 227-1007 (fax) 

Please address all further correspondence regarding this matter to the above address. 

Resp~ .. tftt11y submitted, 

7\ J 

/ .-r··· I 

( / l/. 

D~S~YNE FAA Attorney 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Notice of Unavailability has been served this date, to the 

following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Fax 202-267-1293 

(facsimile and Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested) 

William A. Curtright 

P.O. Box 1350 

Jefferson, OR 97352 

Fax: 503-485-0812 

Email: ames(iil,amesresearch.com 

(Facsimile, Email, and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested) 

Honorable I.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Bldg., Ground Floor, Room Ell-310 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

(facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested) 

Dated: FEB 0 2 2017 

Legal Technician 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

Renton, WA 

DAVID F. SHAYNE, FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
#### State ex rel. Jefson, Petitioner, vs. Mahoney, County Judge, Respondent.

*March 13*

April *7, 1931.*

*441For the petitioner there was a brief by *Leuch, Fichaux & Fellenz*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Peter F. Leuch.*

*C. W. Graves*of Viroqua, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

*State ex rel. Federal M. A. Ins. Co. v. Kellogg,*189 Wis. 638, 208 N. W. 246, is authority for the rule that upon a petition presented to this court for *mandamus*to compel the county court to change the venue of an action, this court will exercise the jurisdiction vested in it by sec. 3, art. VII, Const.

The plaintiff is a resident of Vernon county; the defendant of Milwaukee county; and the complaint charges the defendant with misconduct with persons living in Milwaukee. The application for change of place of trial is based on two claims: first, that Milwaukee county is the proper place of *442trial; and second, because of the convenience of witnesses, the cause of action being based on acts alleged to have been committed in Milwaukee county and defendant’s witnesses reside there.

The proper place of trial of actions for divorce is fixed in the county in which the parties reside or in which one of them is a resident. Sec. 261.01 (3). This section gives the plaintiff the choice of two counties in which he will bring the action, when the husband is a resident of one county and the wife of another. A plaintiff electing to begin an action in the county where either one of the parties is a resident has designated a proper county and the proper place of trial of the action.

While it appears that under the statutes the plaintiff has designated the county which is the proper place of trial, defendant assigns as reason for changing the venue that the acts complained of occurred in the city of Milwaukee, and as her witnesses reside there it would .be for their. convenience to remove the case to that county. This is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court to grant or refuse. *Kopf v. Encking,*91 Wis. 15, 64 N. W. 318; *Lego v. Shaw,*38 Wis. 401; *Postel v. Weinhagen,*86 Wis. 302, 56 N. W. 913. Nothing appearing to show an abuse of discretion or of power vested in the.court, its ruling in denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue is approved.

*By the Court.*— The motion to quash the alternative writ is granted.