alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 18.2**

April 2, 2007

To the Board of Directors of

Channell Commercial Corporation

26040 Ynez Road

Temecula, CA 92591

 

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited theconsolidated financial statements of Channell Commercial Corporation andsubsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, included in yourAnnual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and haveissued our report thereon dated April 2, 2007, which expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share BasedPayment*.  Note B to suchfinancial statements contains a description of your change, during the yearended December 31, 2006, in the date for the annual goodwill impairment testfor the Bushmans reporting unit.  In ourjudgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that ispreferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,
| */s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP* | * * |
|---------------------------------|----------|

 

----
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Dam, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation System-Microirrigation, Irrigation System-Sprinkler, Irrigation System-Surface & Subsurface, Irrigation System-Tailwater Recovery, Irrigation Water Management, Pond, Pumping Plant, Structure for Water Control, Watering Facility.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6562

BENJAMIN HUGH HAMMONDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-02-598-2)

Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Hugh Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Hugh Hammonds seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Hammonds has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

deny his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Iodine Chemical Forms in LWR Severe Accidents (NUREG/CR-5732)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5732 (PDF - 2.91 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 1992**Date Published:** April 1992

**Prepared by:** E. C. Beahm, C. F. Weber, T. S. Kress, G. W. Parker

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6285

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN B0854

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Calculated data from seven severe accident sequences in light water reactor plants were used to assess the chemical forms of iodine in containment. In most of the calculations for the seven sequences, iodine entering containment from the reactor coolant system was almost entirely in the form of CsI with very small contributions of I or HI. The largest fraction of iodine in forms other than CsI was a total of 3.2% as I plus HI. Within the containment, the CsI will deposit onto walls and other surfaces, as well as in water pools, largely in the form of iodide (I). The radiation-induced conversion of F in water pools into 12 is strongly dependent on pH. In systems where the pH was controlled above 7, little additional elemental iodine would be produced in the containment atmosphere. When the pH falls below 7, however, it may be assumed that it is not being controlled and large fractions of iodine as 12 within the containment atmosphere may be produced.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# C_2004229EN.01001602.xml

| 14.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3539 — GOLDMAN SACHS/QMH)

(2004/C 229/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3539. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3539. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
#### Peter, Respondent, vs. Hopp and another, Appellants.

*September 12*

October *8, 1929.*

*550For the appellants there was a brief by *Sanderson & Stapleton*of Sturgeon Bay, and oral argument by *T. A, Sanderson.*

*551For the respondent there was a brief by *Chadek & Cor-nelisien*of Green Bay, and oral argument by *F. P. Cornelisen.*

Rósenberry, C. J.

Counsel for the defendants urge very vigorously and insistently, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, basing this claim upon the fact that the plaintiff knowingly entered a zone of danger and heedlessly submitted himself to the risks and hazards attendant thereon. It is also claimed that the look- and-listen doctrine applies to pedestrians crossing the streets in the face of automobile traffic.

The plaintiff in this case was without dispute in the exercise of some degree of care. He was aware of the situation which had existed at the time and place in question. He had observed the oncoming of the car by which he was subsequently struck. He took a position which he thought it was proper for him to take, where he could be seen and where the oncoming car would have ample opportunity to avoid him. We know of no standard of conduct which enables us to say that in so conducting himself the plaintiff was guilty of a want of ordinary care, as a matter of law. It is a matter of common observation that hundreds of people do exactly what the defendant did in this case. It was clearly a question for the jury whether or not, under all the circumstances, at the time and place in question, the plaintiff was guilty of want of ordinary care.

This case might well have been decided without opinion, but because of the peculiar circumstances and the claims made, a brief statement of facts and our conclusions are given.

Other questions have been raised in the case which have been given careful consideration, but we do not find it necessary to discuss them. It is urged especially that the verdict is excessive. The verdict is large, but under the facts of this case it cannot be said that it is excessive. Plaintiff had loss *552of wages, doctor and hospital bills of $1,032.85, leaving $2,817.15 account permanent disability, pain, and suffering. He sustained an injury to his ear which results in a continuous sizzling noise, both legs were broken, there is a permanent shortening of three quarters of an inch of the right leg, and other circumstances which bring the verdict of the jury within the field of reasonableness.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004238EN.01000101.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 September 2004

(2004/C 238/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2309 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4397 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,039 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5473 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,62 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,339 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5769 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,57 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6637 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4282 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3599 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 165 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,91 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,025 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 841 900 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,722 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5748 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5995 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8435 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0811 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 414,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9134 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2309

JPY

Japanese yen

136,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4397

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68315

SEK

Swedish krona

9,039

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5473

ISK

Iceland króna

87,62

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,339

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5769

CZK

Czech koruna

31,57

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6637

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4282

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3599

ROL

Romanian leu

41 165

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,91

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,025

TRL

Turkish lira

1 841 900

AUD

Australian dollar

1,722

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5748

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5995

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8435

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0811

KRW

South Korean won

1 414,80

ZAR

South African rand

7,9134

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Jefferson County, Respondent, vs. Dodge County, Appellant.

*November 6*

December *3, 1940.*

*239For the appellant there was a brief by *Clarence G. Traeger,*district attorney of Dodge county, and *George A. Hartman*of Juneau, attorneys, and *Wilkie, Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *W. E. Torkelson*of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief by *William H. Rogers,*district attorney of Jefferson county, and *Lynn H. Smith*of Jefferson of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Rogers.*

Faiechili), J.

This is a poor-relief case involving questions of place of legal settlement and whether public aid in the form of mother’s pension under sec. 48.33, Stats., constitutes support as a pauper. If so, then its receipt prevented the acquiring of a new legal settlement in Dodge county.

This case is controlled by the decision in *Milwaukee County v. Waukesha County, ante,*p. 233, 294 N. W. 835. The difference between the cases is one of fact. Here the father is alive but unable to support his family. In the other' case the father was dead. The ruling in that case that sustenance in the form of dependent children’s aid constitutes support as a pauper and prevents the gaining of a new legal settlement, applies here.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment reversing the findings and order of the industrial commission and for further proceedings according to law.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                XETEL CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                         IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                       December 27,  December 28,  December 27,  December 28,
                                                           1997          1996          1997         1996
                                                         --------      --------      --------     --------
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>     
Basic earnings per share:
      Weighted average shares outstanding                   8,840         8,772         8,824        8,683
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========

      Net (loss) income                                  $   (388)     $   (334)     $    128     $    144
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========

      Basic (loss) earnings per share                    $  (0.04)     $  (0.04)     $   0.01     $   0.02
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========

Diluted earnings per share:
      Weighted average shares outstanding                   8,840         8,772         8,824        8,683

      Common stock equivalents: stock options(1) (2)           --            --           734          649
                                                         --------      --------      --------     --------
                                                            8,840         8,772         9,558        9,332
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========

      Net (loss) income                                  $   (388)     $   (334)     $    128     $    144
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========

      Diluted (loss) earnings per share                  $  (0.04)     $  (0.04)     $   0.01     $   0.02
                                                         ========      ========      ========     ========
</TABLE>


(1) Stock options based on the treasury stock method using average market price.

(2) Common stock equivalents were 577,000 and 649,000 for the three months ended
December 27, 1997 and December 28, 1996, respectively. Common stock equivalents
are included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding
only during periods that their inclusion would be dilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2114 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2114

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement security measures 
in the electronic tax return filing process to prevent tax refund fraud 
         from being perpetrated with electronic identity theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2017

   Mr. Yoho introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement security measures 
in the electronic tax return filing process to prevent tax refund fraud 
         from being perpetrated with electronic identity theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITY MEASURES IN ELECTRONIC TAX RETURN 
              FILING PROCESS TO PREVENT TAX REFUND FRAUD.

    (a) In General.--After the completion of the one-year pilot program 
under subsection (b) and taking into account the recommendations 
submitted with respect to such program, the Secretary of the Treasury 
shall implement security measures in the electronic tax return filing 
process designed to prevent tax refund fraud involving electronic 
identity theft.
    (b) Pilot Program.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        establish and carry out a one-year pilot program to implement 
        security measures in the electronic tax return filing process 
        in select counties across the United States where tax refund 
        fraud involving electronic identity theft is most prevalent. 
        Such measures shall include the use of security questions which 
        allow for electronic matching of the answers to such questions 
        to establish the identity of the taxpayer before the electronic 
        filing of a tax return by such taxpayer.
            (2) Recommendations.--After the completion of the one-year 
        pilot program under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall submit recommendations to the Committee on Ways 
        and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
        Finance of the Senate on how to expand the process nationwide.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hog, Appellant, vs. Johnson, Respondent.

*November 9*

December *6, 1932.*

*582The cause was submitted for the appellant on the.brief of *Wegener & Roick*of Madison, and for the respondent on that of *Hall, Baker & Hall*of Madison.

Fairchild, J.

The relation of landlord and tenant was first entered into by the parties and the premises occupied by the respondent in August, 1926. Appellant then leased to the respondent the apartment for the term of one year, rent to be paid each month. Each year thereafter a new lease was drawn and duly executed. The last written lease by its terms fixed its expiration as of August 31, 1930. No written lease was entered into after that date. The respondent continued to occupy the premises until May 31, 1931.

The contention on the part of the respondent is that after August 31, 1931, he occupied the premises in question as a tenant from month to month and that this tenancy was duly terminated on the 31st day of May, 1931, by giving the required thirty-day notice.

The trial court found that in May, 1930, the tenant notified the landlord of his intention to vacate the premises at the expiration of the lease, August 31, 1930, unless he could stay as a tenant from month to month. The conversation or negotiations were carried on between the agent for the respondent and agent for appellant. The arrangement was somewhat informal, but the evidence concerning it raised a judicial question and warrants as a reasonable inference therefrom the conclusion reached by the trial court. There were circumstances tending to sustain the claim of respondent found in the fact that each succeeding year of occupancy by the respondent the appellant had caused to be executed a formal written lease for the succeeding year. Because of the arrangement of May, 1930, the usual lease for the year was not presented to the respondent for execution.

*583It is evident that a landlord and a tenant may agree upon a letting of the premises from month to month where the preceding arrangement has been from year to year. Had there been no such arrangement as to the future occupancy of the premises by the tenant and there had been a holding over, then the term would be presumed tó be for the year. But the option on the part of the landlord to regard the tenant as liable for another year period can obviously not be exercised when the latter remains in possession under an agreement with the landlord that he is to hold for a shorter period. There is no question raised as to the sufficiency of the notice terminating the month-to-month tenancy. We cannot say that the decision of the lower court is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. We find no reversible error.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                             EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                           /s/ Michael J. Kirk
                                           -------------------------
                                           Name: Michael J. Kirk
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 14, 2003