alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

Prescribed Burning (338)

D.2. (-) Undesirable vegetation, 

pests, slash, debris, and residue 

I.3 (-) 

Carbon 

storage 

(short term) 

1. Apply prescribed fire to site

I.5 (+) Runoff, 

surface 

erosion, 

sediment 

production; (-) 

Water quality

Initial setting: Areas and/or ecological sites that are 

controlled, enhanced, or maintained by fire to address (1) 

undesirable vegetation, pests, high wildfire hazard, excess 

slash or debris, or (2) seedling production. Sites can be 

grazed by livestock

Start

I.8 (+) Desired plant 

regrowth

I.10 (-) Runoff, 

surface erosion, 

sediment 

production

I.7 (+) Undesired plant 

regrowth

I.12 (+) 

Quality of 

receiving 

waters 

I.6 (-) 

Wildlife 

habitat 

(short 

term)

I.9 (+) 

Wildlife 

habitat 

(long term)

D.6 (+) Wildfire 

hazard offsite 

(short term)

I.14. (+/-) Wildfire 

suppression activities and 

cost

I.13 (+) Carbon 

storage (long 

term)

C.6 (-) Greenhouse 

gases

I.4 (+) 

Suitable sites 

for planting or 

seeding

D.4 (-) 

Plant 

diseases 

and hosts

I.1 (-) 

Vehicle use 

and safety

Use of 

caution 

signs, 

flaggers, 

etc., to 

comply 

with local 

regulations

Critical Area Planting (342), 

Sediment Basin (350), Use 

Exclusion (472)

C.7 (+) Air quality in 

the airshed

C.8 (+) Related health of 

humans and animals; (-) 

associated costs

C.9 (+/-) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

communities)

D.1 Air quality

(-) Visibility

(+) Particulates

(+) Ammonia

(+) Odor

(+) Acid deposition

(+) Greenhouse gases

I.2 (+) 

Ozone, NOx

D.7 (+) 

Operational 

costs

C.3 (-) Air quality in 

the airshed

C.4 (+/-) Related 

human and animal 

health

Timing and 

concentration of 

practice activities 

within the 

geographic area 

influencing the 

local airshed

C.2 (+) Greenhouse 

gases

C.1. 

(+/-) 

Net 

return 

to 

landowner

I.11 (+) 

Aquatic 

habitats 

C.5 (+) Biodiversity, 

recreational opportunities

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or 

a decrease (-) in the effect 

upon the resource, not whether 

the effect is beneficial or 

adverse.

LEGEND

#. Created by 

practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

D.3 (+) Exposed 

areas; release of 

desired vegetation

D.5 (-) Wildfire 

hazard on and offsite 

(long-term)

Pest Management 

Conservation System (595)

Pasture & Hay 

Planting (512), 

Range Planting 

(550), Tree/Shrub 

Establishment 

(612), etc. 

Firebreak (394)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ALLAN WAYNE MATHERLY, JR., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 348 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LOUIS EUGENE PAYTON, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-44 

LT Case Nos. 16-2017-CF-6923-AXXX

 16-2017-CF-6922-AXXX 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 27, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Lester Bass, Judge. 

Louis Eugene Payton, Live Oak, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and 

Kristie Regan, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (K Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
         KI (See 
        Potassium Iodide
        )

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, August 26, 2020
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016169DE.01001802.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.6.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 169/18 |

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2015/2366 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 25. November 2015 über Zahlungsdienste im Binnenmarkt, zur Änderung der Richtlinien 2002/65/EG, 2009/110/EG und 2013/36/EU und der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1093/2010 sowie zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2007/64/EG

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 337 vom 23. Dezember 2015](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2015_337_R_TOC)
)

Seite 90, Artikel 63 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „a) | Artikel 69 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b, Artikel 70 Absatz 1 Buchstaben c und d sowie Artikel 74 Absatz 2 keine Anwendung finden, ...“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „a) | Artikel 69 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b, Artikel 70 Absatz 1 Buchstaben c und d sowie Artikel 74 Absatz 3 keine Anwendung finden, ...“ |

Seite 95, Artikel 71 Absatz 1:

Anstatt:

„(1)   ... — einschließlich eines solchen nach Artikel 80 — ...“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   ... — einschließlich eines solchen nach Artikel 89 — ...“

---
Argued and submitted November 20,

affirmed as modified December 17, 1979

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of BLACK, *Respondent, and*BLACK, *Appellant.*

(No. D7805 08269, CA 14392)

603 P2d 784

Kristena A. LaMar, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Lindsay, Nah-stoll, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.

Ira L. Gottlieb, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Gillette and Roberts, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*695PER CURIAM

Pursuant to husband’s concession, the decree is modified as follows: (1) the last paragraph of paragraph numbered 4 of the decree, which requires wife to maintain life insurance on her life, is deleted; (2) subparagraph (d) of paragraph numbered 6 of the decree is modified to read as follows: "(d) The youngest living child of the parties shall have attained the age of 18 years.” In all other respects the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified. Costs to appellant.
Denied; and Opinion Filed May 15, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 15
- 00622
- CV IN RE PROGRESSIVE CO UNTY MUTUAL INSURANC E COMPANY , Relator Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 06233 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court has not ruled on its motion to allow the late designation of a medical expert. R elator requests that the Court order the trial court to allow it to designate its expert witness and to allow any related discovery necessary to fairly allow the parties to prepare for trial. Relator further requests that the Court order the trial judge to continue the date of trial to a time that will accommodate its expert designation and related discovery. The mandamus record demonstrates that the trial court conducted a hearing on the motion on April 13, 2015, but has not yet advised the parties of its ruling on the motion. Thus, at this juncture, there is no ruling of the trial court that we may evaluate for abuse of discretion and adequacy of appella te remedy. The case is set for trial on May 18, 2015. The mandamus record does not demonstrate that the trial court does not intend to rule on this matter before trial

commences.– 2

– Because the trial court has not yet ruled, the relief relator requests in i ts petition is not consistent with relator’s complaint that the trial court has abused its discretion in failing to rule. While the Court may, by mandamus, direct the trial court to make a decision, we may not tell the trial court what that decision shou ld be. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals , 362 S.W.2d 101 , 104 (Tex. 1962); State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist. , 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 n. 3 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); In re Tasby , 40 S.W.3d 190, 191 (T ex. App.

— Texarkana 2001, orig. proceeding ) ; O'Donniley v. Golden , 860 S.W.2d 267, 269

– 70 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 1993, orig. proceeding). Because the relief the relator seeks is not consistent with a complaint that the trial court has failed to rule, relator has failed to establish a right to the relief r equested. We deny the petition. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8.

150622F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Summary of Terms of Oral Agreement to Repurchase Shares of Common Stock

held by Corstar Holdings, Inc.




     On November 15, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors both approved the repurchase of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock owned by Corstar Holdings, Inc. at a price of $46.31 per share for an aggregate repurchase
price of $4.631 million.
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **
** **

|                                     |                                   |                                                    |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                   |                                                    |
| Date: April                29, 2008 |                                   | /s/ Steven                C.                Straus |
|                                     | Steven                C. Straus        |
|                                     | Chief                Executive Officer |

|                                       |                                     |                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                     |                                  |
| Date: April                  29, 2008 |                                     | /s/ Alan                  Buckey |
|                                       | Alan                  Buckey             |
|                                       | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH HOME FINANCIAL CORP.
<CURRENCY> 1,685,270
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,685,270
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,586,882
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,186,750
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 59,138,453
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,020,844
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         9,935,331
<LOANS>                                    173,032,686
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,318,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             256,264,554
<DEPOSITS>                                 138,770,110
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,841,629
<LONG-TERM>                                 73,450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,964,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             256,264,554
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,493,500
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,131,531
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               276,254
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            12,901,285
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,743,005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,624,146
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,277,139
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  255,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             151,815
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,985,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,188,110
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,412,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.73
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,580,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,580,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,128,279
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   70,290
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,500
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,318,489
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004206EN.01000602.xml

| 14.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA)

(2004/C 206/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3472. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3472. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of Impax Laboratories, Inc. does hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a)
          or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






   /s/ Barry R. Edwards        Chief Executive Officer     Date: August 9, 2004
----------------------------
     Barry R. Edwards



   /s/ Cornel C. Spiegler      Chief Financial Officer     Date: August 9, 2004
----------------------------
     Cornel C. Spiegler



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
U.S. Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

Riparian Forest 

Buffer (391) 

I.1 (+) Above and 

below ground trapping 

of sediment and 

sediment-attached 

pollutants (pathogens, 

chemicals, pesticides, 

and nutrients)

I.2 (+) Interception 

and infiltration of 

precipitation and 

soil storage

I.5 (+) Denitrification 

of soil nitrates 

C.2 (+) Quality and 

Quality of water 

produced, and 

groundwater recharge

C.5 (+) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

C.1 (-) 

Greenhouse 

gases

C.6 (+) Local 

business and 

support 

infrastructure

I.14 (+) Terrestrial 

wildlife and 

invertebrate species, 

and other organisms

I.12 (+) 

Recreation 

opportunities

I.11 (+) Aquatic 

stream fauna, e.g., 

fish, invertebrates

I.8 (-) 

Stream 

water 

temperature

C.3 (+) Landscape 

scale 

structure/composition

/function

Initial setting: Former riparian forests and habitat used for forage, cropland, 

speculation property, or other nonforest condition. Livestock are excluded 

from riparian areas. Includes cutover riparian zones within forested areas

C.4 (+) Related health of 

humans and animals

D.1 (+) Woody plant 

growth

Forest Stand Improvement (666) 

Tree/Shrub Establishment (612) 

Multi-Story Cropping (379) 

 Tree and Shrub Site Preparation (490) 

Access Control (472)

Prescribed Grazing (528) 

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580)

Critical Area Planting (342)

Filter Strip (393)

Field Border (396)

Pest Management Conservation System (595)

Brush Management (314)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (315)

I.15 (+) 

Landowner 

potential 

income

I.3 (+) Wood fiber 

and other forest 

products

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D.# Direct effect

I.# Indirect effect

C.# Cumulative effect

Pathway

Start

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

1. Woody plants established adjacent 

to watercourse or water body

D.2 (+) Canopy 

Cover/ Vegetation 

Structure

D.3 (+) Vegetation 

Species Composition 

Change

I.13 (+) Quantity and 

quality of terrestrial and 

aquatic habitat

I.4 (+) Nutrient/pollutant 

uptake

I.7 (+) Shade

I.6 (+) Carbon 

capture and 

storage

I.10 (+) Leaf/debris 

fall and woody plant 

mortality

I.9 (-) Surface erosion, 

runoff, and sediment 

production

Note:

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

A pril 6, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00133

- CR

Jose Mario TREVINO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CRS001588D1

Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellan t’s motion to substitute appellate counsel and motion for extension of time to

file the reply brief are granted. We order appellant’s reply brief due April 16, 2017

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, C lerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' JUNE 30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,374)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,417
<PP&E>                                       1,459,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                (96,491)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,552,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,855
<BONDS>                                        614,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     855,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,552,867
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,387
<CGS>                                           57,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.47
        

</TABLE>