alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

263) IV-C-10 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:04 AM Sheet 263 of 276 
a « t 0 Sr''-1. 

USE?.1 

P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

DEC I 0 1991 

Mr. David G. Hawkins 

Senior Attorney 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

1350 New York Ave, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Dear David: 

f?"E"s n a !M* w 

I i '•___ i___.__rj_-.«"°^- - J i .!!>-

L -,t 

^«r 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

111 

J 

This letter responds to your request of November 22, 1991 

that EPA place in the docket copies of any environmental analyses 

of EPA's proposed "WEPCO" rule prepared in response to the July 

22, 1991 oversight hearing of the Subcommittee on Health and the 

Environment of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. You 

have also asked that EPA provide an additional 30 day comment 

period after the inclusion of these materials. You claim EPA 

agreed to take these actions during the hearing. 

After careful consideration of your request and the record 

of the hearing, I cannot agree with your assessment of EPA's 

undertakings to Congressman Waxman. EPA did agree to supplement 

the record with additional information in response to questions 

and responses at the hearing, but EPA did not specifically agree 

to hold the record open until these materials were submitted to 

the Committee. However, EPA has now completed its responses to 

the Subcommittee's questions and will place these into the 

docket. In addition, I am also enclosing a copy for your review. 

Because the comment period has recently been reopened and remains 

open, you now have an opportunity to comment on EPA's responses 

to the Subcommittee. Therefore, I do not believe that it is 

necessary to augment the comment period further. 

William G. Rosenberg 

Assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation 

Enclosure 

Printed on Recycled Paper
#### Latex Tire Company, Respondent, vs. Wheatley, Appellant.

For the appellant: Quarles, *Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Arthur Wickham*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Sttiherland, Hughes & Sutherland*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------------ | --------------------
|                         | John P. Manning     
|                         | Director, President 
|                         | (Principal Executive
|                         | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                         | Assignor Corp.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 725 -CV K e nne th M ic hie , A ppe lla nt

v. Glynn C. Turqu and; Walters & Turquan d, L.L .P .; and S arah Bartholom ew , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0041 56 , HO NORAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt K e nn e th M ic hie ha s f

ile d a n uno pp os e d mot io n to dis mis s th is a pp e a l. Acc ording ly , we grant the motion to dismis s this appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1.

____________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: May

31, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINICIAL DATA
                  FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART
                  OF 360 COMMUNICATIONS' THIRD QUARTER 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0001003959
<NAME>                             360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                       1000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                    9,869
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            94,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                              4,788
<INVENTORY>                                              17,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        181,761
<PP&E>                                                1,364,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                          395,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,225,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   258,079
<BONDS>                                               1,362,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                              306,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,225,460
<SALES>                                                  29,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        795,544
<CGS>                                                    71,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            68,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        144,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       78,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         101,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                             47,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      54,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             54,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004284EN.01000502.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 30 September 2004

in Case C-417/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/18/EC - Deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2004/C 284/10)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-417/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: B. Stromsky) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) — action brought on 3 October 2003 under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann (Rapporteur) and M. Ilešič, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                         |     |                                                                                           
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 6, 2007 | By: | /s/ Richard Dunning                                                                       
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Principal Financial Officer
Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
# C_2004170EN.01001401.xml

| 30.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/14

---

Corrigendum to the operation of scheduled air services — Invitation to tender issued by the Federal Republic of Germany pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the operation of scheduled air services between Erfurt and Munich

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 104 of 30 April 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 104 of 30 April 2004

RE: CPV 62100000.

Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Infrastruktur, Referat Luftverkehr, Max-Reger-Str. 4-8, D-99096 Erfurt.

Paragraph 2 in the invitation to tender for the operation of scheduled air services between Erfurt and Munich, as published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 104 of 30 April 2004, should read as follows:

Official Journal of the European Union

| ‘2. | Subject of the invitation to tender: Operation of scheduled air services between Erfurt and Munich in accordance with the public service obligations imposed on this route, as published in
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 115 of 30 April 2004, instead of
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 103 of 29 April 2004.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2.

Subject of the invitation to tender: Operation of scheduled air services between Erfurt and Munich in accordance with the public service obligations imposed on this route, as published in
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 115 of 30 April 2004, instead of
  Official Journal of the European Union No C 103 of 29 April 2004.’

---
# C_2005006EN.01004601.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/46

---

Action brought on 2 December 2004 by Danish Management A/S against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-463/04)

(2005/C 6/90)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 December 2004 by Danish Management A/S, Viby J, Denmark, represented by C. Kennedy-Loest and C. Thomas, Solicitors.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission's decisions of 18 November 2004 and 30 November 2004 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in tender procedure service contract for a monitoring system of the implementation of projects and programmes of external co-operation financed by the European Community — lot 2: ACP, South Africa and Cuba — EuropeAid 119453/C/SV/Multi; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decisions of 18 November 2004 and 30 November 2004 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in tender procedure service contract for a monitoring system of the implementation of projects and programmes of external co-operation financed by the European Community — lot 2: ACP, South Africa and Cuba — EuropeAid 119453/C/SV/Multi;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submitted a tender for a service contract for a monitoring system of the implementation of projects and programmes of external co-operation financed by the European Community — lot no. 2 covering ACP, South Africa and Cuba, which was published the 26 May 2004 (1).

1

The Commission rejected the tender by decision of 18 November 2004 on the grounds that there was a discrepancy between the applicants financial offer and technical offer as to the number of man/days required. The Commission upheld its decision by letter of 30 November 2004.

The applicant submits that the Commission's decision is based on an error of fact since, according to the applicant, there was no such discrepancy between the two parts of the companies tender.

The applicant further alleges that the Commission ought to have sought to clarify the alleged disrepancy and that in not having done so before rejecting the applicants tender the Commission has taken a disproportionate action and failed to exercise due diligence, whereby it infringed its duty of care.

---

(1)  OJ S 102-081573.

1

---
----

NOTICE TO CANDIDATES WITH ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO THIS TEXT

(2004/C 139 A/02)

ONLY THE APPLICATION FORM AND OPTICAL READER FORM ENCLOSED IN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL PRINTED BY THE OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES WILL BE REGARDED AS ORIGINALS. FOR THIS REASON, PHOTOCOPIES OR ANY OTHER COPY OF THESE DOCUMENTS (OBTAINED ELECTRONICALLY, FOR INSTANCE) WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

TO OBTAIN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL PLEASE APPLY, BEFORE 12 JUNE 2004, TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ADDRESSES:

QUOTING THE REFERENCE ‘SELECTION PROCEDURE PE/88/S’, THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH YOU WISH TO RECEIVE THE DOCUMENTATION AND THE ADDRESS TO WHICH IT SHOULD BE SENT.

----
<PAGE>
 
                           TOMORROW'S MORNING, INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            Three months ended       Nine months ended
                                                                              March 31, 1998           March 31, 1998
                                                                            ------------------       -----------------
<S>                                                                          <C>                      <C>
Net loss                                                                      $(1,073,715)                $(5,975,111)

Basis for computation of primary earnings per common and
 common equivalent share:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during period                     2,818,692                   2,796,906

Weighted average (incremental) common share equivalent after
 considering the effects of options and warrants outstanding
 during the period ended March 31, 1998 and after assumed
 repurchase of treasury shares as required by Securities and
 Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83                               - 0 -                     - 0 -
                                                                                ---------                   ---------

Total weighted average number of shares                                         2,818,692                   2,796,906
                                                                                =========                   =========
Loss per share                                                                  $  ( 0.38)                  $   (2.14)
                                                                                =========                   =========

</TABLE>

                                                                         Page 16
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 6, 2016

t0829

Order 

Clerk

September 6, 2016

151697 (14)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151697

COA: 325695

Wayne CC: 03-009642-FC

JAMAL LATAZ KING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 29, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
# C_2004118EN.01000101.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/1

---

Request for an Opinion submitted by the European Parliament under Article 300(6) of the EC Treaty

(Opinion 1/04)

(2004/C 118/01)

A request for an Opinion under Article 300(6) of the EC Treaty was made on 21 April 2004 by the European Parliament, represent by R. Passos, H. Duintjer Tebbens and N. Lorenz, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The European Parliament requests the Court of Justice for a reply to the following questions:

| (a) | Is the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) EC the appropriate legal basis for the Council Decision on the conclusion of the proposed agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Is the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) EC the appropriate legal basis for the Council Decision on the conclusion of the proposed agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection?

| (b) | Must the abovementioned proposed agreement be regarded as being compatible with the right to protection of personal data, as enshrined in particular in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which the Community is required to observe in the same way as the Treaty? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Must the abovementioned proposed agreement be regarded as being compatible with the right to protection of personal data, as enshrined in particular in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which the Community is required to observe in the same way as the Treaty?

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1


                             FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                             INVITROGEN CORPORATION
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         Pursuant to Section 12 of the Invitrogen Corporation 1997 Stock Option
Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended to add a new Section
4.3 thereto to read as follows:

                  "4.3 INDIVIDUAL SHARE LIMIT. The maximum aggregate number of
         shares of Stock with respect to which Options may be granted during any
         calendar year to any Employee may not exceed 500,000 shares or, in the
         case of the calendar year during which an Employee first commences
         employment with any Participating Company, 1,000,000 shares (subject to
         adjustment to reflect changes in capital structure covered by Section
         4.2 above)."