alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>                         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                                 FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART
                                 OF 360 COMMUNICATIONS' THIRD QUARTER 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     0001003959
<NAME>                           360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         5,772 
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                106,302 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,300 
<INVENTORY>                                   32,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             227,227
<PP&E>                                     1,627,781 
<DEPRECIATION>                               521,466 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,962,937 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        292,772 
<BONDS>                                    1,849,643 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,233 
<OTHER-SE>                                   498,853 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,962,937 
<SALES>                                       36,568 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             994,617 
<CGS>                                         81,329 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                118,899 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             188,920 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              22,797 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            97,603 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              114,539 
<INCOME-TAX>                                  54,408 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           60,131 
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  60,131 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.49
        

</TABLE>
#### J. C. WADE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20979.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 1965.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1965.

*1017Zach H. Douglas, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

Samuel S. Jacobson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS * and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the Tenth Circuit sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

 This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence on an indictment charging the use of the mails to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. Error is predicated on the admission of answers to certain questions on cross-examination of the defendant, duly objected to on the ground that they were not admissible for the purpose of proving intent. We agree they were not admissible to show intent, but we think they were proper preliminary questions to a further inquiry, had they been answered in the affirmative, which would have tested the truth of the testimony of the defendant that he had acted in good faith and were admissible as primary evidence. Error is also predicated upon another question propounded on cross-examination of the defendant. The court sustained an objection to that question and instructed the jury to disregard it. The defendant was represented by counsel of his own choice, who did not move for a mistrial. Hence, he may not here urge that the instruction of the trial court did not cure the harm resulting from the question ; and we do not think we should notice the alleged error of our own motion.

Affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Consolidated Guidance: 10 CFR Part 20 — Standards for Protection Against Radiation (NUREG-1736)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1736            - Cover – Chapter 3 (PDF - 9.91 MB)
          - Appendix A – End (PDF - 8.21 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2001**Date Published:**October 2001

**Prepared by:** R.E. Zelac, J.L. Cameron, H. Karagiannis, J.R. McGrath, S.S. Sherbini, M.L. Thomas, J.E. Wigginton

Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document, NUREG-1736, "Consolidated Guidance: 10 CFR Part 20 - Standards for Protection Against Radiation," consolidates guidance into a single comprehensive source by reference to numerous guidance documents. It complements the NUREG-1556 series, "Consolidated Guidance about Materials Licenses." Since Part 20 applies to all NRC licensees, in varying degrees, it extends beyond the materials scope of NUREG-1556. Each section in this document provides the following:
        - A statement of the requirement (reflecting revisions published in the *Federal Register* through October 13, 1999);
        - A discussion of the requirement;
        - A statement of the requirement's applicability;
        - A guidance statement;
        - A list of existing regulatory guidance (Regulatory Guides, NUREG reports);
        - A list of existing implementation guidance (Information Notices, health physics positions, Part 20 questions and answers, etc.).

NUREG-1736, "Consolidated Guidance: 10 CFR Part 20 - Standards for Protection Against Radiation," also identifies prior guidance that is now outdated and in some cases subject to withdrawal or revision.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
TS-EMLA40

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical SubstancesTS-EMLA40Attachment #2

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the

New Chemical Substances – General Description TS-EMLA40
#### Rohde, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Gessert, Administrator, and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Eugene L. McIntyre*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents *: D. J. Regan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY"S FORM 10KSB/A AND IS 
QUAILIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMEENT.S 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,203,669
<SECURITIES>                                 22,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                27,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  698,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,995,453
<PP&E>                                       1,316,627
<DEPRECIATION>                               (164,452)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,325,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        728,882
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     2,612
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,253,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,325,361
<SALES>                                      2,496,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,727,870
<CGS>                                        2,238,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                717,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (57,420)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           175,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (346,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (346,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2004217EN.01003101.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/31

---

Action brought on 17 June 2004 by Elisabeth Saskia Smit against Europol

(Case T-244/04)

(2004/C 217/55)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against Europol was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 June 2004 by Elisabeth Saskia Smit, residing in Scheveningen (Netherlands), represented by P. de Casparis and M.F. Baltussen.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Europol's decision of 19 May 2003 together with the decision of 19 March 2004 on her complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Europol's decision of 19 May 2003 together with the decision of 19 March 2004 on her complaint;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant contests the defendant's decision not to consider her for a number of vacant posts. The applicant submits that the defendant committed a manifest error of assessment.

---
# EWP in the News

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Programs & Initiatives 
-  Emergency Watershed Protection 
-  EWP in the News 

Current Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program national news and announcements.

##   EWP In The News

### Biden-Harris Administration Invests in Watershed Infrastructure to Help Communities Recover from, Prepare for Natural Disasters as Part of Investing in America Agenda

May 22, 2023

The Biden-Harris Administration today announced that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is making investments, including from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, in watershed infrastructure to help communities recover from and prepare for natural disasters. 

### EWP Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) funding 2023

The 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act provided $925 million total for EWP emergency projects, including the 28 receiving funding now.

Emergency Watershed Protection

### Watershed Programs - Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) Funding 2022-2023

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) invested $918 million in Watershed Program projects that addressed new, ongoing, emergent, and relief to all communities to address watershed resource concerns. 

Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program

### President Biden and USDA Invest More Than $166.5 Million in Infrastructure to Protect American Communities

March 03, 2022

“The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to building back better, and this starts with our infrastructure,” Vilsack said.

**Secretary Vilsack Convenes State Agriculture Leaders from the Colorado River Basin as Part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Comprehensive Approach to Address Unprecedented Drought in the Region**

**Published**March 23, 2023 - Denver, CO

**FACT SHEET: One Year of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law at USDA**
# Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601) (7/2021) Standard Document(129.22 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601) Overview(178.73 KB)

Vegetative Barrier (Ft.) (601) Network Effects Diagram(161.77 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# Sediment Basin (No.) (350) Conservation Standard Document

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Sediment Basin (No.) (350) Conservation Standard Document 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Sediment Basin (No.) (350).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Sediment Basin (No.) (350) (5/16) Standard Document(157.33 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Sediment Basin (No.) (350) Overview(259.05 KB)

Sediment Basin (No.) (350) CPPE(25.42 KB)

Sediment Basin (No.) (350) Network Effects Diagram(40.17 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
Exhibit
      23.2


CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on
        Form   S-8 (Nos. 333-87255, 333-110750 and 333-114945) of Zones,
        Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2005, except for Note 15, as to which
        the
        date is November 13, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial
        statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.
  
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
 Seattle,
        Washington
 November
        13, 2007
No: 19-043 September 10, 2019

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200

NRC Awards Fiscal Year 2019 Academic Grants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has awarded 45 grants to 33 academic institutions in 

19 states and Puerto Rico, totaling $15 million in fiscal year 2019.

Recipients include four-year universities and colleges, two-year trade school and community 

colleges, and minority serving institutions, which are a federally recognized category of educational 

establishments.

Congress authorized the NRC to provide federal funding opportunities to qualified academic 

institutions to encourage careers and research in nuclear, mechanical and electrical engineering, 

health physics, and related fields to meet expected future workforce needs. Recipients are to use the 

grants for scholarships, fellowships and faculty development.

More than 5,200 students in 35 states and Puerto Rico have been recipients of the NRC 

program over its 10-year tenure. Through this program, NRC has funded multiple research and 

development, educational and training, and experiential learning projects to enhance academic 

excellence and to produce a skilled future workforce.

The NRC announces grant opportunities on www.grants.gov, which enables the public to 

find and apply for federal funding opportunities. Information regarding the review process also is 

available. A panel of reviewers, from academia and the NRC, evaluates the grant proposals. The 

panel composition is diverse, with most reviewers having experience reviewing proposals for 

government agencies and advanced credentials in nuclear engineering, health physics, 

radiochemistry or related disciplines. All panelists must certify no conflict of interest for the 

proposals they evaluate. 

The complete list of grants awarded and general information about the grant program are 

available on the NRC’s website.
| Subsidiary                                     |   | State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| NetLogic Microsystems, Inc.                    |   | Delaware                                     |
| NetLogic Microsystems International Limited    |   | British Virgin Islands                       |
| NetLogic Microsystems Caymans Limited          |   | Cayman Islands                               |
| NetLogic Microsystems LLC                      |   | Delaware                                     |
| NetLogic Microsystems Europe Limited           |   | United Kingdom                               |
| NetLogic Microsystems (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.      |   | China                                        |
| NetLogic Asia Limited                          |   | Hong Kong                                    |
| NetLogic Microsystems Europe BV                |   | Neatherlands                                 |
| NetLogic Microsystems Europe SAS               |   | France                                       |
| NetLogic Microsystems Asia HK Limited          |   | Hong Kong                                    |
| NetLogic Microsystems International HK Limited |   | Hong Kong                                    |
| NetLogic Microsystems Japan, K.K               |   | Japan                                        |
| NetLogic Microsystems Korea, Inc.              |   | Korea                                        |
| NetLogic Semiconductor Private Limited         |   | India                                        |
| NetLogic Processors India Private Limited      |   | India                                        |
| RMI International Caymans Limited              |   | Cayman Islands                               |
| RMI Technologies (Beijing) Limited             |   | China                                        |
| RMI Technologies (Shanghai) Limited            |   | China                                        |
| RMI Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited            |   | China                                        |
| Roadster, LLC                                  |   | Delaware                                     |
| Aeluros, Inc.                                  |   | Delaware                                     |
| Lara Networks, Inc.                            |   | Delaware                                     |
Waste Transfer (634)

Notes:

Effects are qualified with 

a plus (+) or minus (-). 

These symbols indicate 

only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect 

upon the resource, not 

whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

Waste Storage Facility (313) 

Composting Facility (317)

Nutrient Management (590)

Amendments for the Treatment of Agricultural Waste (591) 

Waste Treatment (629)

Waste Recycling (633)

Sprinkler System (442) 

Critical Area Planting (342)

Heavy Use Area Protection (561) 

Mulching (484)

Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces (373) 

Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (380)

Dust Management for Pen Surfaces (375) Start

Initial Setting: Dust emissions from 

animal activity in feedlots, corrals, 

and other pen surfaces are causing 

air quality issues

1. More frequent manure 

harvesting to remove dry,

loose manure layer.

Conduct manure harvesting to 

remove accumulated manure D.4 (+) Manure accumulation

2. Increase stocking density 

to supply additional moisture 

from animal urine and feces

Irrigation Reservoir (436)

Pond (378)

Waste Storage Facility (313)

3. Mobile water application to 

increase moisture content of

the pen surface.

NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS – NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

LEGEND

Mitigating Practice

Associated Practice

#. Created by

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

D.3 (+) Solid manure to 

be managed/stored

Pathway

I.2 (-) Cost of compliance with 

regulatory requirements, if applicable

I.1 (+) Animal health and productivity 

from improved air quality in feedlots,

corrals, and other pen surfaces

C.1 (-) Ambient 

particulate matter/ 

dust concentrations

D.1 (-) Direct emissions 

of particulate matter/dust

I.4 (-) Water quantity D.6 (+) Water use C.4 (-) Regional 

water availability

Conduct manure harvesting in 

addition to water application to 

reduce amount of water needed

D.2 (+) Operation and 

maintenance costs

D.5 (+) Infrastructure costs

I.3 (+) Potential 

farm income

C.3 (+/-) Net 

farm income

C.2 (+) Local/regional 

air quality

improvement
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInterim Staff Guidance

# Interim Staff Guidance Used by the Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Reviews (FCSE)

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

NRC-2018-0134 was issued as a Federal Register Notice to explain the withdrawal of the following FCSS-ISGs; 01, 03, 05, 08, 09, and 10.

## Draft FCSS Interim Staff Guidance

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 09, 2020
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Canal or Lateral, Irrigation Field Ditch, Irrigation Land Leveling, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation System-Tailwater Recovery, Irrigation Water Management, Mulching, Nutrient Management, Pumping Plant, Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management, No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till, Residue Management, Seasonal, Structure for Water Control, Subsurface Drain, Waste Treatment, Waste Utilization, Water Well.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.