alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices: Commonly Associated Practices:**Agrichemical Handling Facility, Anaerobic Digester, Composting Facility, Constructed Wetland, Critical Area Planting, Nutrient Management, Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant, Roofs and Covers, Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Transfer, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Rocky Mountain

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 24 WY 0.0351958 1.67E-05 0.0020958 0.0010125 0.0046958 0.0430167

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Rocky Mountain = 0.04 divided by 0.8, or 5%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 23 WY 0.0423348 3.91E-05 0.002313 0.0001174 0.0058957 0.0507

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Rocky Mountain = 0.05 divided by 0.5, or 10%
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly  Report of Edison  Renewables,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  June  30,  2004  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 16, 2004                         /s/ Paul Steo
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Paul Steo
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: May 17, 2011, Conference Call with Waste Management on Landfill Gas and the 

2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

 

On May 17, 2011, EPA had a conference call with members of Waste Management to discuss 

their issues and concerns with the implementation of the final rule entitled, “Identification of 

Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal 

Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that meeting, Waste Management representatives expressed concerns with their 

perception of how landfill gas would be regulated under the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. EPA asked 

clarifying questions regarding the information presented. 

Expected or Invited Meeting Attendees:

Waste Management Representatives 

EPA Invitees: 

Keith Barnett 

Jim Berlow 

Alan Carpien 

David Cozzie 

Susmita Dubey 

George Faison 

Michael Galbraith 

Rachel Goldstein 

Mimi Guernica 

Toni Jones 

Charlotte Mooney 

Sonya Sasseville 
MaryBeth Sheridan 

Steven Silverman 

Matt Straus 

Marc Thomas 

Peter Tsirigotis 

Paul Versace 

Hillary Ward
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Resources Group, LTD. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge and belief:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Report of Advanced Resources Group, LTD.


Date:  September 17, 2008             /s/  Richard Dunning
                                ----------------------------------
                                           Richard Dunning
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                   Acting Chief Financial Officer
# FIRI - Version 1.2

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  FIRI - Version 1.2 

Field Irrigation Rating Index approximates or quantifies approximate water conservation through changes made to irrigation systems or through management.

### Download Software

              - FIRI.msi
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) or


RULE
15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial
Officer of KSW, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
11, 2010





/s/ Richard W. LucasRichard
      W. LucasChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           6,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                       240
<INVENTORY>                                     12,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,854
<PP&E>                                          16,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,027
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,461
<SALES>                                         24,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,467
<CGS>                                           22,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    733
<INCOME-TAX>                                       278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005019EN.01000602.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 28 October 2004

in Case C-16/04: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 89/654/EEC - Protection of workers - Safety and health of workers in the workplace - Emergency doors, windows and skylights - Failure to transpose)

(2005/C 19/11)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-16/04, action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 20 January 2004, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Kreppel and D. Martin) against Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: C.-D. Quassowski and M. Lumma) – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and J. Malenovský, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004 in which it:

| (1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary fully to comply with Council Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace (first individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary fully to comply with Council Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace (first individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| (2) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004.

1

---
#### In re Guardianship of Evenson: Evenson and another, Appellants, vs. Evenson, Respondent.

For the appellants : *Edwin Larkin*of Mondovi.

For the respondent: *Ole J. Eg gum*of Whitehall, and *F. V. McManamy*of Eau Claire.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
*March 3, 1936.*

#### Rell, Respondent, vs. Fogarty and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Genrich & Genrich,*attorneys, and *Miles Lambert*of counsel, all of Wausau.

For the respondent: *Leonard F. Schmitt*of Merrill.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005019EN.01002801.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/28

---

Action brought on 1 October 2004 by Bactria Industriehygiene-Service Verwaltungs GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-401/04)

(2005/C 19/59)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 October 2004 by Bactria Industriehygiene-Service Verwaltungs GmbH, Kirchheimboladen, Germany, represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Order the defendant to respond to the applicant's request; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to respond to the applicant's request;

| — | Or, in the alternative, order the annulment of the European Commission's act D 341571(04); |
| --- | --- |

—

Or, in the alternative, order the annulment of the European Commission's act D 341571(04);

| — | Order the defendant to compensate the applicant in the provisional amount of 1 euro for damages suffered as a result of the defendant's failure to comply with its obligations under Community law by failing to respond to the applicant, or, in the alternative, as a result of the European Commission's act D 341571(04), as well as any applicable interests, pending the exact calculation and determination of the exact amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to compensate the applicant in the provisional amount of 1 euro for damages suffered as a result of the defendant's failure to comply with its obligations under Community law by failing to respond to the applicant, or, in the alternative, as a result of the European Commission's act D 341571(04), as well as any applicable interests, pending the exact calculation and determination of the exact amount;

| — | Order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law invoked are similar to those invoked in Case T-400/04, Arch Chemicals and Arch Timber Protection/Commission.

---
#### Goyk, Appellant, vs. Goyk, Respondent. (Case No. 1.)

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Wauke-sha county dated May 17, 1926: David W. Agnew, Judge.

Ejectment, action. Judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant: *Casimir Gonski*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Lockney & Lowry*of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2087 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand the H–2A worker 

program to include certain additional laborers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2017 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand 

the H–2A worker program to include certain additional 

laborers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending the Agricul5 tural Industry’s Requirements Year-round Act of 2017’’ 

6 or as the ‘‘DAIRY Act of 2017’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF H–2A WORKER PROGRAM TO IN8 CLUDE CERTAIN ADDITIONAL LABORERS. 

9 Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and 

10 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2087 IH

1 amended by inserting after ‘‘abandoning’’ the following: 

2 ‘‘who is coming temporarily to the United States to per3 form agricultural labor or services as a dairy worker, or’’. 

4 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE FOR PERIOD OF ADMISSION OF H–2A 

5 NONIMMIGRANTS EMPLOYED AS SHEEP6 HERDERS OR DAIRY WORKERS. 

7 Section 218(h) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1188(h)) is amended by adding at the end 

9 of the following: 

10 ‘‘(3) In the case of an alien admitted as an H– 

11 2A worker for employment as a dairy worker— 

12 ‘‘(A) the initial period of admission shall 

13 be for a period of 18 months; 

14 ‘‘(B) the period of admission may be ex15 tended for additional periods of 18 months; and 

16 ‘‘(C) no period of absence from the United 

17 States may be required as a condition of ap18 proval of an extension under subparagraph 

19 (B).’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James T. Roberto,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ James T. Roberto
--------------------
James T. Roberto
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002

                                       19
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

D.1. (-) Economic risk

Setting: Where transport vehicles can 

access an available water source for fire 

suppression, livestock water, small acreage 

irrigation, or wetland management.

Start

D.2. (+/-) Quantity of 

water available for fire 

suppression, livestock, 

small acreage 

irrigation, and wetland 

management

I1. (-) Cost of 

insurance, fire 

protection measures

DRY HYDRANT (432)

LEGEND

#. Created by 

practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

1. Pipe and related 

appurtenances installed 

in an existing dependable 

water supply

C.3. (+/-) Agricultural 

production or wildlife 

habitat

C.1. (+/-) Economic 

benefits to landowner and 

community

D.4. (-) Loss of 

agricultural or 

wildlife land

3. All weather vehicle 

access area

C.2. (+) Public health 

and safety

2. Operation of hydrant

Critical Area Planting (342)

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) 

or minus (-). These symbols indicate 

only an increase (+) or a decrease (-

) in the effect upon the resource, not 

whether the effect is beneficial or 

adverse.

D.3. (-) Wildfire 

hHazard
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 2, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00571

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.R.S. AND L.J.R.S.

, Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Be xar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA01865

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting : San dee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chap a, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The en banc court has considered Appellant ’ s motion for en banc reconsideration. T he

motion is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.7

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MI CHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Szychulski (Anton), Appellant, vs. Miller, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Raymond J. Cannon,*attorney, and *John L. Newman*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Thomas E. Torphy*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-44141, Form S-3 No. 333-40451 and Form S-8 dated October 9,
1997) of Arden Realty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
January 29, 1998 (except for Note 21, as to which the date is February 23,
1998), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Arden Realty, Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997.


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher S. Hardesty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ CHRISTOPHER S. HARDESTY
--------------------------------------
Christopher S. Hardesty
Chief Financial Officer
#### Thill, Appellant, vs. Klein, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Charles J. Kunny*of Port Washington, attorney, and *Wm. B. Collins*of Sheboygan of counsel.

For the respondent: *Schanen & Huiros*of Port Washington.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.1


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                              SMAN CAPITAL TRUST I

         This Certificate of Trust of SMAN Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), dated
May 9, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by Bankers Trust (Delaware), a
Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a business trust under the
Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss.3801 et seq.)(the "Act").

         1.       Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is SMAN
                  Capital Trust I.

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
                  of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Bankers Trust
                  (Delaware), E.A. Delle Donne Corporate Center, Montgomery
                  Building, 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, Delaware
                  19805-1266.

         3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
                  as of its filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the effective date above
written in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                                   Bankers Trust (Delaware), as Trustee



                                   By:            /s/ John V. Lavin
                                          -------------------------------------

                                   Name:            John V. Lavin
                                          -------------------------------------
                                   Title:       Assistant Vice President
                                          -------------------------------------