alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005031EN.01002602.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/26

---

Action brought on 10 November 2004 by Energy Technologies ET S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-445/04)

(2005/C 31/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 November 2004 by Energy Technologies ET S.A., established in Fribourg (Switzerland), represented by A. Boman, lawyer.

Aparellaje Elèctrico S.L., established in Hospitalet de Llobregat (Spain), was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 7 July 2004 (Case R 0366/2002-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 7 July 2004 (Case R 0366/2002-4);

| — | order the OHIM to pay the applicant's costs relating to this matter. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the applicant's costs relating to this matter.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | Energy Technologies ET S.A. |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark concerned: | Word mark ‘UNEX’ for goods in classes 7 and 11 (Heat exchangers being part of machines; Heat exchangers as well as parts and fitting therefor) - application No 974881 |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Aparellaje Eléctrico S.L. |
| Trade mark or sign cited in opposition: | Spanish word mark ‘UNEX’ for goods in the old Spanish class 6, 17 and 61 (pipes, screws, cabling and laying of cables and pipes in electronic and electrical engineering systems;...) |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Rejection of the application for Community trade mark |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94. |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

Energy Technologies ET S.A.

Community trade mark concerned:

Word mark ‘UNEX’ for goods in classes 7 and 11 (Heat exchangers being part of machines; Heat exchangers as well as parts and fitting therefor) - application No 974881

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Aparellaje Eléctrico S.L.

Trade mark or sign cited in opposition:

Spanish word mark ‘UNEX’ for goods in the old Spanish class 6, 17 and 61 (pipes, screws, cabling and laying of cables and pipes in electronic and electrical engineering systems;...)

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Rejection of the application for Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.

---
# C_2004251EN.01001503.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/15

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 July 2004

in Case T-341/02: Regione Siciliana v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(ERDF - Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 - Termination of financial assistance - Action for annulment - Direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 251/27)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-341/02: Regione Siciliana, represented by I. Braguglia, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. de March and L. Flynn, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of Commission Decision D (2002) 810439 of 5 September 2002 terminating the financial contributions from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in respect of the major project ‘Messina-Palermo motorway’ (ERDF No 93.05.03.001 – ARINCO No 93.IT.16.009) — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Register, made an order on 8 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| (1) | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| (2) | The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ No C 7 of 11.1.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   578,034
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          3,445,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                             549,356
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       4,243,997
<PP&E>                                                 5,390,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,288,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        40,507,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  7,670,472
<BONDS>                                               10,608,280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                   10
<COMMON>                                                   9,019
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,165,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          40,507,593
<SALES>                                                6,605,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      18,233,485
<CGS>                                                  5,259,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          7,378,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       6,714,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         452,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,050,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (3,041,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (3,041,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (3,041,655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0


</TABLE>
# Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Structure for Water Control (No.) (587).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) (10/17) Standard Document(73.86 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) Overview(127.78 KB)

Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) CPPE(24.56 KB)

Structure for Water Control (No.) (587) Network Effects Diagram(68.45 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Structure for Water Control

This video explores how Steve Ward of Wareham, Massachusetts, implemented this conservation practice on his cranberry operation.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
August 3, 2015

Mr. Christopher Scott Thedford

129 Cleveland Road

Sweetwater, TN 37874

Dear Mr. Thedford:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7 (a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119,

91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a )(2), 91.417(a) and (b),

and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your May 25, 2015

, exemption request into the public docket

(No. FAA− 20 15

− 2064 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, yo u must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 1 1.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

I f you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 21, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 21, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0442. MICHAEL WASHER v. JANELLE HERNANDEZ. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV274782
#### Green, Appellant, vs. New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Lynn D. Jaseph*of Green Bay.

For the respondent: *North, Bie, Duquaine, Welsh & Trowbridge*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2                                                      Kevin D. Bower

                                   AGREEMENT
                            TO FOREGO COMPENSATION

An Agreement is made between Kevin D. Bower (the "Executive") and Alltrista
Corporation (the "Company").

WHEREAS, the Executive has been and continues to be a valued key executive of
the Company;

WHEREAS, the Company desires to make a loan to the Executive; and

WHEREAS, the Executive agrees to forego all of the balances payable to the
Executive under the 1993 Deferred Compensation Plan and the Excess Savings and
Retirement Plan (the "Plans").

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the aforementioned promises, and for other
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows, intending to be legally bound.

1.   The Company agrees to enter into a loan agreement (the "Loan Agreement") to
     provide a loan to the Executive.  The terms of the loan shall be documented
     by a Promissory Note (the "Note") to be executed by the Company and the
     Executive.

2.   In consideration for the Company's promise to enter into the Loan
     Agreement, the Executive's account balances in the Plans shall be reduced
     to zero effective March 31, 2001.  The Executive's balances in the Plans
     shall be foregone by the Executive, and the Executive hereby irrevocably
     waives his right to payment of such amount.

3.   The Executive agrees that:  the Company has not advised him as to any
     financial or tax risks associated with this Agreement or the Loan Agreement
     and Note to be entered into pursuant to this Agreement; that the Executive
     has relied solely on his personal advisors in deciding to enter into this
     Agreement and the related transactions; and, that the Executive (and his
     successors, heirs and assigns) assume responsibility for any tax or
     financial risks incurred by the Executive (or his successors, heirs and
     assigns) resulting from the transaction.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Agreement, intending to be
legally bound,

                                                   Alltrista Corporation

/s/ Kevin D. Bower                                 By: /s/ Thomas B. Clark
-----------------------------                      -----------------------------
Kevin D. Bower

March 29, 2001                                     March 29, 2001
-----------------------------                      -----------------------------
Date                                               Date
# C_2004251EN.01001602.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/16

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 July 2004

in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 251/29)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-39/03: DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart (Germany), represented by N. Siebertz, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the intervener before the Court of First Instance being Axon Leasing GmbH, established in Munich (Germany), represented by S. Lüft, lawyer — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2002 (Case R 329/2001-4) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: J. Pirrung, President, N. J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 5 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE DAVID BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-93-264-V)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie David Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr.,

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie David Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

his “motion to modify term of imprisonment” pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-93-264-V

(W.D.N.C. Dec. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BODY & TANK CORP., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 50, Docket 28589.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Petition for Rehearing Dec. 16, 1964.

Decided April 21, 1965.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for a rehearing is granted and the previous decision of this Court, 339 F.2d 76 (1964), is withdrawn. Enforcement of the order of the Board is denied and the order is set aside. American Ship Bldg. Co. v. NLRB, 85 S.Ct. 955 (March 29, 1965).
#### Schultheiss, Special Administrator, Respondent, vs. Klass and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Barber, Keefe, Patri & Horwits*of Oshkosh.

For the respondent: *Joseph E. Housner*and *Victor J. O’Kelliher,*both of Oconto.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.
William Wilson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
    Report.




Date:
      January 13, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      R. William WilsonR.
      William Wilson
                    Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Capitan
Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and will be retained by El Capitan
Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Georges
Benarroch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Osprey Gold Corp.., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report") fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the periods presented therein.

                                        Date: November 15, 2006


                                        By: /s/ Georges Benarroch
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Georges Benarroch
                                            Acting President & Chief Executive
                                            Officer And Acting Chief Financial
                                            Officer


                                       23
Exhibit
      32.2








**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                May 10, 2006
            /s/
                Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.Frank
                C. Marchisello, Jr.
              Vice
                President, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust, Sole
                General Partner of the Registrant
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

Chief Financial Officer's Certification required under Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.

                                   /s/ David P. Johnson
Date: March 25, 2003              ___________________________________
                                      David P. Johnson
                                      Executive Vice President and Chief
                                      Financial Officer
#### Kraus, Respondent, vs. Koch and others, Executors, imp., Appellants.

For the appellants: *Nohl, Nohl, Petrie & Blume*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Theodore Kronshage, Jr.*and *Otto Dorner,*attorneys, and *Benjamin Poss*and *Joseph P. Brazy*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.