alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Month, Year

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Herbaceous Weed treatment (Code 315) 

Herbaceous weed treatment is the removal or control of

herbaceous weeds including invasive, noxious, prohibited,

or undesirable plants. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to all lands—except active cropland—

where herbaceous weeds need to be removed, reduced, or

otherwise manipulated. 

This practice is used to control undesirable plants while protecting or enhancing desired plant species.

This practice can enhance the quality and quantity of forage, restore wildlife habitat, protect soils from

erosion, reduce fuel loads and wildfire hazards, and control pervasive plants on the site. Ecological

site descriptions, when available, other suitable information, and the producer’s purpose for applying

the practice are used to enhance plant communities adapted to the site. 

Treatment methods for undesired plants can be chemical, mechanical, or biological. Herbicide use

always requires following product labels. Selective herbicides can treat the target species and

minimize impacts to the desired and native vegetation. Mechanical treatment methods can include

mowing, manually removing, or other nonchemical methods. Biological treatment with NRCS

assistance can be done when using grazing or browsing animals. 

Herbaceous weeds can shade out desired species and leave the soil vulnerable to erosion. When

treating the weeds, efforts to minimize soil disturbance must be taken to avoid potential erosion.

Pervasive weeds may need more than one treatment to control them to the desired level. 

Whichever treatment method is chosen—chemical, mechanical, or biological—a written plan with

specific details is part of planning to use this practice. 

Operation and maintenance of this practice is especially important as weeds can resprout or regrow

with favorable conditions. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Herbaceous Weed Treatment (Code 315) is commonly

applied with other conservation practices, such as NRCS CPSs Prescribed Grazing (Code 528),

Pasture and Hay Planting (Code 512), Nutrient Management (Code 590), Conservation Cover (Code

327), Range Planting (Code 550), Tree /Shrub Establishment (Code 612), or Wildlife Habitat Planting

(Code 420). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# Card Widgets

### Card With Button Widget

**Card With Button**

## Card With Button Sample

This is summary text - character limit is 300.

Button

## Card With Button Sample

This is summary text - character limit is 300.

Button

## Card With Button Sample

This is summary text - character limit is 300.

Button

## Card With Button Sample

This is summary text - character limit is 300.

Button

----

### Image Tile With Hover Effect Widget

**Image Tile With Hover Effect**

ADAMS Public DocumentsSearch and view NRC's public documents
Read More

Event ReportsReports Associated with Events.
Read More

Open GovernmentNRC Approach to Open/Digital Government
Read More

LicensingLearn about the reactor licensing process.
Learn More

# NRC Style Guide Pages

### NRC Style Guide

### Band Widgets

### Card Widgets

### Form Widgets

### Hero, Image and Map Widgets

### Sidebar Widgets

### Specialty Widgets

### Two Column Page Band Widgets

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-86,869-03

EX PARTE JAMES LUEIS FONTENOT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D090817CR IN THE 260TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ORANGE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that TDCJis incorrectlycalculating his time credit. Applicant has alleged

facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial

court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The

trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to

obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial

court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
2

it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify

this Court of counsel’s name.

The response shallinclude Applicant’s sentence begin date and his maximum discharge date. 

The response shall also state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution

system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing

this application, Applicant properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by Section

501.0081(b) of the Government Code. The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as

to whether TDCJ has correctly calculated Applicant’s time credit. The trial court may make any

other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: November 24, 2021

Do not publish
# C_2004178EN.01000602.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3196 — BELGIUM CA — AGRICAISSE — LANBOKAS / CREDIT AGRICOLE BELGIQUE)

(2004/C 178/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 August 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3196. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3196. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Gilbert Hu, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AltiGenCommunications, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                                 evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                                  disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)                                  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)                                 anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: February 17, 2004 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |   |
| By:                     | /s/ Gilbert Hu |   |
|                    | Gilbert Hu  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Surface Complexation Modeling of Uranium (VI) Adsorption on Natural Mineral Assemblages (NUREG/CR-6708)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6708 (PDF - 15.90 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2001**Date Published:** March 2001

**Prepared by:** J.A. Davis

U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA 94025

J.D. Randall, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6054

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The value of surface complexation modeling of radionuclide adsorption in supporting the selection of Kd values should be given wider recognition within the performance assessment modeling process. Studies of uranium(Vl) adsorption by a weathered schist and specimen mineral phases that comprise the schist were conducted as a function of aqueous chemical conditions in laboratory experiments. The schist was collected from weathered, subsurface soil in the vicinity of the Koongarra uranium deposit (Northern Territory, Australia). The variable aqueous chemical conditions in the experiments caused significant variations in the speciation of dissolved uranium(VI) and the distribution coefficient, Kd, that describes the partitioning of uranium(VVI) between the aqueous and solid phases. Kd values determined in the laboratory experiments compared favorably with *in-situ* partitioning constants derived from analyses of dissolved uranium(VI) in groundwater and in the subsurface soils. Mineral coatings were more important than bulk mineralogy in controlling U(VI) adsorption by the schist. Various surface complexation modeling approaches were developed to describe adsorption of uranium(VI) on the schist and its reference mineral phases. One of the modeling approaches, the Generalized Composite approach, can reduce the uncertainty in Kd values chosen for performance assessment modeling. Surface complexation modeling offers a scientifically defensible means of linking the selection of Kd values for performance assessment modeling to existing knowledge of thermodynamic data for radionuclides and radionuclide speciation in aqueous systems.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
ConservaƟon PracƟce Standard Overview 

December 2012 

Shallow water development and management 

is the inundation of lands to provide habitat for 

fish and/or wildlife. 

 

PracƟce InformaƟon

This practice is applied where water can be 

impounded or regulated by diking, excavating, 

ditching, and/or flooding. It can also be used 

to provide refuge habitats for native fish 

during high-flow periods. 

The purpose is to provide habitat for wildlife 

such as shorebirds, waterfowl, wading birds, 

mammals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and 

other species that require shallow water for at 

least a part of their life cycle. 

Site selection is important for the success of 

this practice. Soils must have a low 

permeability or seasonal high water table. The 

site must be free of hazardous materials, and 

the water supply must be adequate to 

maintain water levels between 1 to 18 inches 

in depth over the majority of the area during 

the inundation period. 

Operation and maintenance is very important 

to ensure that this practice functions as 

intended throughout its expected life and 

includes monitoring and management of 

structural components and habitat quality 

provided. Waterfowl and shorebird feeding 

and resting areas may need to be burned, 

disked, or surface disturbed every 3 to 5 

years to set back succession and control the 

growth of undesirable plants. 

Common Associated PracƟces 

Shallow Water Development and 

Management (646) is commonly applied with 

conservation practices such as Dike (356), 

Structure for Water Control (587), Irrigation 

Water Conveyance (428), Pipeline (516), 

Pond (378), and Wetland Wildlife Habitat 

Management (644). 

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office. 

Shallow Water Development and 

Management (646) 

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Date: April 23, 2015 Meeting: Center for Methane Emissions Solutions Meeting Rule(s) **Di~cusscd:** Written Materials? Yes/No Name Organization 

# n~rA **lN))~ c**  

# -p\( \) (_ **~VD** (( 

# ~~co-N



# ~ c 

# ,.J\ 

# G'"'**tv\~** f\



# ~

Phone Number 

### . '2 0 ?_ - 

### 'J '-1 

### ? - cl f; q 

### 1

**~~** 

### -34-3 

### .qry3,b
# C_2004118EN.01001101.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-240/01: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Excise duties on mineral oils - Directive 92/81/EEC - Mineral oils used as heating fuel)

(2004/C 118/19)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-240/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and K. Gross), with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma) — application for a declaration that, by applying Paragraph 4(1)(2)(b) of the Mineralölsteuergesetz (Law on the taxation of mineral oils) of 21 December 1992 (BGBl. I, p. 2185, corrigendum in 1993 I, p. 169), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(2) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 12), as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994 (OJ 1994 L 365, p. 46), in so far as that Member State has not made all mineral oils intended for use as heating fuel subject to excise duties — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris (Rapporteur), acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Declares that, by applying Paragraph 4(1)(2)(b) of the Mineralölsteuergesetz (Law on the taxation of mineral oils) of 21 December 1992, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first sentence of Article 2(2) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994, inasmuch as it has not made all mineral oils intended for use as heating fuel subject to excise duties; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by applying Paragraph 4(1)(2)(b) of the Mineralölsteuergesetz (Law on the taxation of mineral oils) of 21 December 1992, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first sentence of Article 2(2) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994, inasmuch as it has not made all mineral oils intended for use as heating fuel subject to excise duties;

| 2) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 1.9.2001.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR15-13-000]


Palmetto Products Pipe Line LLC; Notice of Petition for 
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on January 23, 2015, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2014), Palmetto Products 
Pipe Line LLC, filed a petition for declaratory order seeking approval 
of the overall rate structure and terms of service for a new pipeline 
system that will transport refined petroleum products and denatured 
fuel ethanol from origin points in Louisiana, Mississippi, and South 
Carolina to destination points in South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, 
all as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd9dacddcd0f1f3f6f1facceaefeff0edebdff9faedfcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4a2a1b6a7ab8a888d8a81b79194948b9690a482819687ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on February 23, 2015.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02111 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>