1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: BECKHAM, LISA

Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:24 PM

To: Steve Burr; Mays, Rory; Trevor Baggiore; michael.sundblom@pinalcountyaz.gov; 'Scott 

DiBiase'

Cc: McKaughan, Colleen; Walters, Julie; Wehling, Jefferson

Subject: RE: Arizona permitting jurisdiction and rule applicability

Attachments: 2014-05-07 Draft NSR SIP Supplement-ADEQ and County Jurisdiction-revR9.doc

Hi Steve, sorry for taking an extra day to get this to you. We didn’t make any specific edits related to changing the 

document from a clarification to a submittal. From our call on Monday, it sounds like you’ve already started making 

those changes. 

From: Steve Burr [mailto:Burr.Steven@azdeq.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:21 AM 

To: Mays, Rory; Trevor Baggiore; michael.sundblom@pinalcountyaz.gov; 'Scott DiBiase' 

Cc: McKaughan, Colleen; BECKHAM, LISA; Walters, Julie; Wehling, Jefferson 

Subject: RE: Arizona permitting jurisdiction and rule applicability 

A revised version of the supplement is attached for our discussion this afternoon. I accepted all of the direct edits from 

the EPA draft. Our revisions in response to EPA comments are shown in Word markup. I haven’t put the appendices 

together yet. 

From: Mays, Rory [mailto:Mays.Rory@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 4:01 PM 

To: Steve Burr; Trevor Baggiore; michael.sundblom@pinalcountyaz.gov; 'Scott DiBiase' 

Cc: McKaughan, Colleen; BECKHAM, LISA; Walters, Julie; Wehling, Jefferson 

Subject: Arizona permitting jurisdiction and rule applicability 

Steve – 

Thanks again for drafting and sharing your document about ADEQ and County jurisdiction regarding permitting. Very 

helpful. Attached are our minor edits for your consideration (see tracked changes). We also would like to offer the 

following suggestions: 

(1) Appendix C may or may not be necessary. ARS 49-107 was approved into the SIP on 11/5/2012 and is the most 

current version. ARS 49-402 was last approved into the SIP on 6/8/2000, but we’ll need to check if has been 

revised since. Also, I’m not sure the extent to which the older statutes (e.g., ARS 36-1706) were retained or 

removed from the SIP. 

(2) Add an Appendix D that includes the delegation agreement to Pima regarding Sundt Generating Station and the 

assertion of jurisdiction by ADEQ over Rosemont Copper Mine in Pima County; 

(3) Add an Appendix E that includes the existing SIP-approved assertion of jurisdiction over sources in Apache, 

Navajo, Santa Cruz, Yavapai counties, the existing SIP-approved assertion of jurisdiction over sources in Cochise 

County, and the new-to-the-SIP order/letters from the 1980’s asserting jurisdiction over Mohave, Coconino, 

Gila, and Yuma counties, so that one can find all of the AZ SIP NSR jurisdiction-related materials in one place; 

and 
2

All – 

Per our biweekly call today, we’d like to schedule a follow-up call to discuss the form and timing of submitting this 

clarifying document. I attach a copy of some relevant CAA and CFR SIP requirements. Here are some time slots that work 

well for EPA folks. Please let me know which of these may work well for you, and then I’ll see about reserving a 30-60 

minute time slot and conference line. 

· Tue. 5/6 – 10-11am 

· Tue. 5/6 – 2:30-3:00pm 

· Wed. 5/7 – 1-3:30pm 

· Thu. 5/8 –1:30-4:00pm 

Thanks very much, everyone! 

Rory 

P.S. There is some chance I’ll be out on either Tuesday or Wednesday, but this call can proceed without me if need be. 

Likely EPA attendees include Colleen McKaughan, Jeff Wehling, Julie Walters, Lisa Beckham, and me. 

Rory M. Mays 

Air Division, Planning Office 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

75 Hawthorne St. (AIR-2), San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 972-3227, mays.rory@epa.gov