alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,795,962
<SECURITIES>                                22,529,410
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,128,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (473,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,605,489
<PP&E>                                       6,553,236
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,224,508)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,502,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,515,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,986
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,727,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,502,573
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,938,208
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,050,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,871,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (57,102)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,740,017
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,390,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,413,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,413,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004179EN.01000401.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage by order of 22 April 2004 in the case of Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie Nevedi v Produktschap Diervoeder

(Case C-194/04)

(2004/C 179/07)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of 22 April 2004 of the Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (Local Court, The Hague), which was received at the Court Registry on 27 April 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie Nevedi v Produktschap Diervoeder on the following questions:

| 1. | Are Article 1(1)(b) of Directive 2002/2 (1) and/or Article 1(4) of Directive 2002/2, to the extent to which it amends Article 5c(2)(a) of Directive 79/373 by requiring percentages to be listed, invalid by reason of:






  (a) | the absence of a legal basis in Article 152(4)(b) EC; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 1(1)(b) of Directive 2002/2 (1) and/or Article 1(4) of Directive 2002/2, to the extent to which it amends Article 5c(2)(a) of Directive 79/373 by requiring percentages to be listed, invalid by reason of:

1

(a)

the absence of a legal basis in Article 152(4)(b) EC;

| (b) | infringement of fundamental rights, such as the right to property and the right freely to exercise a trade or profession; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

infringement of fundamental rights, such as the right to property and the right freely to exercise a trade or profession;

| (c) | infringement of the principle of proportionality? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

infringement of the principle of proportionality?

| 2. | If the conditions are satisfied under which a national court of a Member State is entitled to suspend implementation of a contested measure of the Community institutions, in particular also the condition that the question concerning the validity of the contested measure has already been referred by a national court of that Member State to the Court of Justice, are the competent public authorities of the other Member States themselves also entitled, without judicial intervention, to suspend the contested measure until such time as the Court of Justice has given a ruling on the validity of that measure? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the conditions are satisfied under which a national court of a Member State is entitled to suspend implementation of a contested measure of the Community institutions, in particular also the condition that the question concerning the validity of the contested measure has already been referred by a national court of that Member State to the Court of Justice, are the competent public authorities of the other Member States themselves also entitled, without judicial intervention, to suspend the contested measure until such time as the Court of Justice has given a ruling on the validity of that measure?

---

(1)  OJ L 63 of 6 March 2002, pp. 23 to 25.

1

---
# Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) (10/2020) Standard Document(205.48 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) Overview(286.55 KB)

Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) CPPE(25.04 KB)

Irrigation Ditch Lining (Ft.) (428) Network Diagram(86.89 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
*November 8, 1940.*

#### Hayward (Nina), Plaintiff, vs. Real Radio Service, Inc., and another, Appellants: Hayward (Ralph) and another, Interpleaded Defendants and Respondents.

For the appellants : *Bendinger, Hayes, Kluwin & Schlosser*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents : *Lines, Spooner & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Chas. B. Quarles*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Chicago & North Western Railway Company, Respondent, vs. Brzezinski and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Adolph P. Lehner*and *Lehner & Leh-ner,*all of Oconto Falls.

For the respondent: *John F. Baker*and *Llewellyn Cole,*both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11

Wilmar Industries, Inc.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                  Three Months                     Three Months
                                                                                      Ended                            Ended
                                                                                 March 28, 1997                   March 29, 1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                              <C>                              <C>
Income before income taxes                                                       $     3,303,561                  $    1,625,612

Provision for Income Taxes                                                             1,231,700                         666,000
                                                                                 ----------------                 ---------------

Net Income                                                                       $     2,071,861                  $      959,612
                                                                                 ================                 ===============

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding during the period                                 13,048,371                       8,985,934

Common Stock Equivalents:
  Preferred Stock                                                                                                        731,972

Items issued within one year of IPO:(1)
  Common Stock
  Stock Options                                                                          270,291                         228,380
                                                                                 ----------------                 ---------------
 
Total Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                                             13,318,662                       9,946,286
                                                                                 ================                 ===============
Net Income Per Share                                                             $          0.16                  $         0.10
                                                                                 ================                 ===============
</TABLE> 

(1)Common stock issued and stock options granted at prices lower than the 
assumed initial public offering price within a one year period prior to an 
initial public offering are included in the calculation (using the treasury 
stock method and the assumed initial public offering price) as if they were 
outstanding for all periods presented.


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Fully diluted earnings per share differs from primary earnings per share by less
than 3%.
AMENDMENT TO THE TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1999 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
 Amendment Company
 Plan
 Committee
   1.
    
    Section 2.18 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:Independent Director means a Director of TeleTech who is not an employee of
TeleTech or any Subsidiary.2.
    
    Section 2.29(g) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:Termination of Service shall mean,(a) As to an Independent Director, the time when a Participant who is an Independent
Director ceases to be a Director for any reason, including, without limitation, a
termination by resignation, failure to be elected, death or retirement, but excluding
terminations where the Participant simultaneously commences employment with TeleTech or
remains in employment or service with TeleTech or any Subsidiary in any capacity.(b) As to an employee, the time when the employee-employer relationship between a
Participant and TeleTech or any Subsidiary is terminated for any reason, including, without
limitation, a termination by resignation, discharge, death, disability or retirement; but
excluding terminations where the Participant simultaneously commences service with TeleTech
as an Independent Director.The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine the effect of all matters and
questions relating to Terminations of Service, including, without limitation, the question




---



##### 



of whether a Termination of Service resulted from a discharge for cause and all questions of
whether particular leaves of absence constitute a Termination of Service; provided,
however, that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, unless the Committee
otherwise provides in the terms of the Award Agreement or otherwise, a leave of absence,
change in status from an employee to an Independent Director or other change in the
employee-employer relationship shall constitute a Termination of Service only if, and to the
extent that, such leave of absence, change in status or other change interrupts employment
for the purposes of Section 422(a)(2) of the Code and the then applicable regulations and
revenue rulings under said Section. For purposes of the Plan, a Participants
employee-employer relationship or Independent Director relations shall be deemed to be
terminated in the event that the Subsidiary employing or contracting with such Participant
ceases to remain a Subsidiary following any merger, sale of stock or other corporate
transaction or event (including, without limitation, a spin-off).3.
    
    All references in the Plan to termination of employment and/or employment
termination in the Plan are hereby amended to refer to Termination of Service.4.
    
    This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan
effective as of the Effective Date, but only with respect to Awards granted under the Plan
on or after the Effective Date.5.
    
    Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-12-00320-CR

NO. 09-12-00321-CR 

________________

OLIVIA NICOLE BARTEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 21857, 22192

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Olivia Nicole Bartee pleaded guilty to engaging in organized 

criminal activity and burglary of a vehicle. The trial court found the evidence 

sufficient to find Bartee guilty, but deferred further proceedings and placed Bartee

on community supervision for five years in the engaging in organized criminal 

activity case and one year in the burglary of a vehicle case. The State subsequently 

filed a motion to adjudicate guilt in each case. Bartee pleaded “not true” to all of 

the alleged violations of the conditions of her community supervision in each
2

case.

1 After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Bartee

violated the conditions of her community supervision, found Bartee guilty of

engaging in organized criminal activity and burglary of a vehicle, and assessed 

punishment at ten years of confinement in the engaging in organized criminal 

activity case and one year of confinement in the burglary of a vehicle case.

Bartee’s appellate counsel filed briefs that present counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the records and conclude the appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On November 21, 2012, we granted an 

extension of time for Bartee to file pro se briefs. We received no response from 

Bartee.

We have reviewed the appellate records, and we agree with counsel’s 

conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it 

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeals. Compare 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial 

court’s judgments.

2

 1

The judgments erroneously state that Bartee pleaded “true.”

2

Bartee may challenge our decision in these cases by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
3

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

Chief Justice

 

Submitted on March 5, 2013

Opinion Delivered March 27, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2012

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
May 2019

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Dust_Control_on_Unpaved_Roads_and_Surfaces (Code 373)

The treatment of unpaved roads and surfaces to reduce

dust (airborne particulate matter) produced by vehicle and

machinery traffic or wind action.

Practice Information

The objective of this practice is to reduce or eliminate dust

(direct PM) emissions from either the mechanical action of

vehicles and machinery or from high winds on unpaved roadways or other surfaces. Control of dust

generated by the activity of animals is handled under the Dust Control from Animal Activity on Open

Lot Surfaces conservation practice (375).

Dust from roads can lead to visibility and safety issues along and near roadways. It can deposit on

nearby vegetation, resulting in poor plant health. It also can deposit on water bodies or streams

leading to increased sedimentation and reduced aquatic organism health.

There are a variety of dust suppressants that can be used to reduce dust from unpaved travelways.

These include substances that require rather frequent reapplication (such as water), and those with

relatively long control lifetimes (such as petroleum emulsions). Some suppressants contain chemicals

that can have deleterious effects on nearby streams and water bodies from runoff from treated areas.

The benefits of this practice can be significant and immediate. Dust is reduced or eliminated, as well

as the consequent impacts. Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces will require maintenance

over the expected life of the practice.

Common Associated Practices

Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces (373) is commonly applied with practices such as

Critical Area Planting (342), Windbreak/ Shelterbelt Establishment (380), Dust Control from Animal

Activity on Open Lot Surfaces (375), and Mulching (484).

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
November 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (Code

644) 

Wetland wildlife habitat management involves developing

or managing habitat for wetland wildlife. 

Practice Information 

This practice is used to create or improve habitat for

waterfowl, furbearers, or other wildlife. It can be applied on

or adjacent to wetlands, rivers, lakes, and other water

bodies where wetland-associated wildlife habitat can be managed. 

The practice is planned for specific species of wildlife. Specifications for the application of this practice

may include items such as: 

• Seasonal water depths necessary to provide adequate habitat during different seasons of the

year, 

• Plant species required for reproduction, food, and cover by target species of wildlife. 

• Management of vegetation to assure sustainability. 

Invasive plant species and Federally/State listed noxious and nuisance species shall be controlled on

the site. 

Common Associated Practices 

Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as

Wetland Restoration (657), Wetland Enhancement (659), Structures for WIldlife (649), Wildlife Habitat

Planting (420), Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats (643), Shallow Water

Development and Management (646), Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645), Prescribed Burning

(338), and Riparian Forest Buffer (391). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

 

3. Canopy cover and 

vertical vegetative structure 

from established plants

1. Wood fiber in 

established plants

D.5 (+) Carbon 

storage

I.6 (-) Greenhouse 

gases

D.7 (+/-) 

Aesthetics

I.7 (+) Woody 

corridor wildlife; 

(-) habitat 

fragmentation

D.3 (+) Initial wood 

fiber growth rate

I.1 (-) Later wood 

fiber growth rate 

and plant health

I.2 (+/-) Harvestable wood 

fiber for renewable 

biomass/fuel

I.4 (+/-) Return 

to producer

D.8 (-) Wind velocity

I.10 (-) Airborne 

particulate matter, 

odor, wind-borne 

snow and sediment 

deposition

D.9 (-) 

Microclimate 

extremes

D.2 (-) 

Land 

available 

for crop 

production

I.3 (+/-) Potential income 

2. Woody plant 

root systems, 

litter and soil 

organic matter

C4 (+/-) Income and income stability 

(individuals and community)

I.9 (+) 

Recreational 

opportunities

I.13 (+/-) Quality and 

production of livestock 

and/or crops

C.1 (+) Air quality 

of airshed

C.2 (+) Health of 

humans and animals; 

(-) associated costs

D.6 (+) 

Shade and 

habitat

I.15 (+) Energy 

conservation 

I.14 (+) 

Potential 

income 

I.8 (+) Wildlife 

health and 

populations 

I.11 (-) 

Snow 

removal

I.5 (+) Soil 

health

Start

Initial setting: (1) Cropland; forage land; animal 

feeding operations; or urban area where wind 

erosion, snow drift, plant, animal, and human 

stress related to wind or temperature; energy 

consumption; or odor are concerns; (2) existing 

decadent windbreaks/shelterbelts that have 

reduced functionality for intended purposes

Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment and 

Renovation (380)

D.1 (+) Cost 

for installation 

and 

maintenance 

(O&M)

I.12 (-) 

Pesticide 

drift

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) 

or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

D.11 (+) 

Evapotranspiration

D.10 (+) 

Interception of 

precipitation

C.3 (+) Water quality of 

receiving watercourse or aquifer

I.16 (+) Infiltration 

of precipitation 

and soil storage

D.4 (+) Litter 

buildup on 

soil surface

Forest Stand Improvement, 666 

Tree/Shrub Establishment, 612 

periodic tree removal and 

replacement to maintain growth