T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RI CH A RD LELA N D N EA L; REX CA RL S AG E L Y, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. S T A T E O F A R I Z O N A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15364 D. C . No . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 8 2 0 3 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i c ha r d L e l a nd N e a l a nd R e x C ar l S a ge l y( “ pl a i nt i f f s ” ) appe a l pr o s e f

r om th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g th e ira c tio n a lle g in g th a t d e f e n d an ts un l aw ful l y r ef

used t o rec og ni ze as val i d for use i n A ri zona thei r purpo rt ed Indi an 

# FI LED JU N 08 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15364 2 tr i be - i s s ue d dr i ve r ’ s l i c e ns e s , ve hi c l e r e gi s tr a t i ons , a nd ve hi c l e t i t l e s . W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . R h o a des v . A v o n P r o d s ., Inc. , 504 F . 3d 1151, 1156 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . W e m aya f f i rm on a nygr ound s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d , T hom ps on v . P aul , 54 7 F . 3d 10 55 , 10 58 -59 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dw e a f

f i rm. D i sm i ss alof pl ai nt i ff

s’ Indi an tribal sovere i gn ty and Indi an C om m er ce C l ause cl ai m s w as prop erbecause the grou p w ho se pu rport ed ri gh t s pl ai nt i ff s are a s s e rtin g is n o t an I n d ian tr ib e o rb an d . Se e Kahaw ai olaa v . N or ton , 386 F . 3d 1 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 2 - 7 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) ( r e c o g n i z i n g th a tme mb e r s o f atr i b e a r e o f

as a me or si m i l arra ce ); N

avaj o T ri ba l Ut i l i t y A uth. v. A ri

z. D ep ’ t of R e v e nue , 608 F . 2d 1228, 1231- 32 ( 9th C i r . 1979) ( “ I ndi an tr i be s orba nds a r e s e par a t e c om m uni t i e s of c i t i z e ns of

I ndi a n de s c e nt , pos s i bl yw i th ac om m on r a c i a l or i gi n, pos s e s s i ng the p o w e ro f as o v e r e ig n to r e g u la te th e irin te rn a l an ds o c ia l r e la tio n s .” ) ; see a l so Cr ow T r i be of I ndi ans v . Montana , 650 F . 2d 1104, 1108- 10 ( 9th C i r . 1981) ( d is c u s s in g tr ib a l s o v e r e ig n tyc la im s ) , am ended o n deni alof re h’g , 665 F . 2d 1390 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 2 ) . P la in tif f s ’ tr e a ty - b a s e dc la im s a ls o f a il. Se e Skokom is h I

ndi an T ri be v. U ni ted States , 41 0 F . 3d 50 6, 51 2, 51 5-16 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en banc) (a dd re ss i ng tre aty- base d cl ai m s) . D is m is s a l o f

p la in tif f s ’ e q u a l p r o te c tio n c la im s w a s p r o p e rb e c au s e th e ir10- 15364 3 g ro up i s n o tsi tu at edsi m i l arl y t o g o v ern m en t al en t i t i es th ati ssu e d ri v er l i cen ses, v e h ic le r e g is tr a tio n s , a n dv e h ic le title s . See T hornton v . C i t

yof St. H e le ns , 425 F .3 d1 1 5 8 , 1 1 6 7 - 6 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . P la in tif f s ’ du e p r o c e s s c la im s a ls o f a il. See Mi l lerv. R ee d , 17 6 F . 3d 12 02 , 12 05 -06 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( ho l di ng no const i tut i on al ri gh tt o d ri ve) . P l ai nt i ff s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.