alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l<f i HISTORY~ 

October 5, 2015 

Gerardo C. Rios 

Chief, Air Permits Office, Air Division 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region IX 

7 5 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Re: National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation - McElmo Creek Unit Oil 

Production Facility, San Juan County, Utah (CHS #69067) 

Dear Mr. Rios: 

Thank you for your correspondence dated and received by our office on September 30, 2015 

regarding the additional information requested by our office concerning the consultation of the 

above-mentioned project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106). 

After review of the provided information, we do not object with the proposed Area of Potential 

Effects (APE). After review of the assessment of adverse effect, we concur with the recommended 

finding of no histon·cproperties affetted [36 CFR 800.4(d)(1)] under Section 106. 

If unidentified archaeological resources are discovered during construction, work must be 

interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register criteria, 36 

CFR 60.4, in consultation with this office. 

We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as 

stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting 

parties. Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause 

our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings. 

Please note that our compliance letter does not end the 30-day review period provided to other 

consulting parties. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Jennifer Bryant, our Section 

106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-2673 or jennifer.bryant@state.co.us. 

ward C. LJI; {2 l State Historic Preservation Officer
October 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Riparian Forest Buffer (Code 391) 

An area predominantly covered by trees and/or shrubs

located adjacent to and up-gradient from a watercourse or

water body. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to areas adjacent to permanent or

intermittent streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, and areas

associated with ground water recharge. The riparian forest

buffer is a multipurpose practice designed to accomplish

one or more of the following: 

• Reduce transport of sediment to surface water, and reduce transport of pathogens, chemicals,

pesticides, and nutrients to surface and ground water 

• Improve the quantity and quality of terrestrial and aquatic habitat for wildlife, invertebrate

species, fish, and other organisms 

• Maintain or increase total carbon stored in soils and/or perennial biomass to reduce atmospheric

concentrations of greenhouse gasses 

• Lower elevated stream water temperatures 

• Restore diversity, structure, and composition of riparian plant communities 

 

Dominant vegetation consists of existing or planted trees and shrubs suited to the site and purpose(s)

of the practice. Grasses and forbs that come in naturally further enhance the wildlife habitat and

filtering effect of the practice. Headcuts and streambank erosion should be assessed and treated

appropriately before establishing the riparian forest buffer. Specifications for each installation are

based on a thorough field investigation of each site. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Riparian Forest Buffer (Code 391) is commonly applied

with other conservation practices, such as NRCS CPSs Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Code 390),

Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (Code 395), Streambank and Shoreline Protection

(Code 580), and Tree/Shrub Establishment (Code 612). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2169 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2169

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance information 
   sharing in the Department of Homeland Security State, Local, and 
       Regional Fusion Center Initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Fusion Centers' Access to 
Information Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED INFORMATION SHARING IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 
              SECURITY STATE, LOCAL, AND REGIONAL FUSION CENTER 
              INITIATIVE.

    Subsection (b) of section 210A of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 124h) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the semicolon at 
        the end the following: ``and conduct outreach to such fusion 
        centers to identify any gaps in information sharing and consult 
        with other Federal agencies to develop methods to address such 
        gaps, as appropriate'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (12) as 
        paragraphs (4) through (13), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) identify Federal databases and datasets, including 
        databases and datasets used, operated, or managed by Department 
        components, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the 
        Department of the Treasury, that are appropriate, in accordance 
        with Federal laws and policies, to address any gaps identified 
        pursuant to paragraph (2), for inclusion in the information 
        sharing environment and coordinate with the appropriate Federal 
        agency to deploy or access such databases and datasets;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Colorado State and Area Office Contacts

Po Box 25426DenverCO80225-0426

Po Box 25426DenverCO80225-0426

Colorado

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Colorado 
-  Colorado State and Area Office Contacts 

NRCS staff are dedicated to natural resource conservation. They live and work in the communities they service,  providing technical expertise and financial assistance to Colorado's farmers, ranchers, forest land-owners, and other land stewards. NRCS employees help people help the land.

## Welcome to NRCS in Colorado!

### Clint Evans, State Conservationist

Colorado NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, XXXX

----

## Key Contacts

### Clint Evans

                -    720-544-2810 
                -    clint.evans@usda.gov 

### Lisa Hunt

                -    720-544-2804 
                -    lisa.hunt@usda.gov 

### Petra Popiel

                -    720-544-2808 
                -    petra.popiel@usda.gov 

### Elizabeth With

                -    970-261-8709 - cell 
                -    elizabeth.with@usda.gov 

### Alyson Keaton

                -    970-534-2291 
                -    alyson.keaton@usda.gov 

### TJ Burr, PE

                -    720-930-9011 - cell 
                -    tee.burr@usda.gov 

### Todd Boldt

                -    970-215-9897 
                -    Todd.boldt@usda.gov 

### Kindra Brandner

                -    970-520-2162 
                -    kindra.brandner@usda.gov 

### Eugene Backhaus

                -    720-544-2868 
                -    Eugene.backhaus@co.usda.gov 

### Brian Domonkos

                -    720-544-2852 
                -    brian.domonkos@usda.gov 

### William "BJ" Shoup

                -    720-544-2850 
                -    william.shoup@usda.gov 

### NRCS AREA ONE

                -    720-544-2960 - Direct720-390-2892 - Cell 
                -    chad.cherefko@usda.gov 

### NRCS AREA TWO 

                -    970-534-2287 - Direct970-356-8097 - Office 
                -    bailey.rapp@usda.gov 

### NRCS AREA THREE

                -    720-544-2807 - Office 
                -    deric.clemons@usda.gov 

----

##   Colorado NRCS State Office Directory
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2014

Contour Buffer Strips (Herbaceous) (332 )

I.10 (+) Quality of 

wildlife habitat

D.10 (+) Maintenance 

requirement―removal 

of sediment, 

revegetation

D.4 (+) Ponding

of runoff water

C.5 (+/-) Income and

income stability 

(individuals and

community) 

C.1 (+) Preservation of 

infrastructure; reduced 

community 

maintenance costs

I.1 (-) Sediment and 

particulate contaminants 

(including pathogens) to 

sensitive areas

C.3 (+) Fishable and 

swimmable waters; 

reduced health and safety 

issues for humans, 

domestic, and wild animals

I.4 (+) Soil 

health

Initial setting: Sloping cropland 

contributing runoff to sensitive 

areas

I.6 (+) Nutrient 

absorption by 

organisms

I.2 (-) Maintenance 

of drainage ditches 

and other structures

I.5 (+) Crop production I.12 (+) Net return 

to farmer

C.2 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters 

C.4 (+) Air quality in 

the air shed 

D.6 (+) Wildlife 

food and cover

D.3 (+) Adsorption and 

transformation of 

pollutants 

D.1 (+) 

Filtration

D.5 (+) Infiltration

I.8 (-) Greenhouse 

gas emissions

D.8 (+) Forage 

production

I.3 (-) Dissolved 

contaminants 

(including nutrients) 

to sensitive areas

I.13 (+) 

Biodiversity

I.11 (-) Pesticide use

I.9 (+) Beneficial 

insects

C.6 (+) Habitat 

suitability, health to 

humans, domestic,

and wild animals 

D.9 (-)

Crop 

production

(+) (-)

2. Cropped area changed 

to contour farming

D.2 (-) Sheet and rill 

erosion

I.7 (+) Crop 

biomass/ carbon 

sequestration

D.7 (-) Particulate matter

 (-) Chemical drift

Start

3. Cropland removed 

from production

1. Area of permanent vegetation 

planted on the contour

I.12 (-) Net return 

to farmer

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or 

a decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
v                                                                  Exhibit 99.3
                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general partner of Tanger Properties Limited  Partnership  hereby certifies,  to
such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Operating
     Partnership  for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2003 (the  "Report")
     fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.


     Dated: May 14, 2003           /s/ Stanley K. Tanger
            ------------           ------------------------------------
                                   Stanley K. Tanger
                                   Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust
                                   Sole General Partner of the Registrant
# L_2015300EN.01000501.xml

| 17.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2045

of 13 November 2015

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Jāņu siers (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Latvia's application to register the name ‘Jāņu siers’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Latvia's application to register the name ‘Jāņu siers’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jāņu siers’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jāņu siers’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Jāņu siers’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 November 2015.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 204, 20.6.2015, p. 20.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# A Compilation of Reports of The Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (NUREG-1423)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 21, 2021
#### John C. LOAN, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 9804.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 8, 1965.

Decided April 20, 1965.

F. Byron Parker, Richmond, Va., for appellant.

H. Merrill Pasco, Richmond, Va. (Robert P. Buford, Jr., and Robert F. Brooks and Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell & Gibson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and STANLEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Loan, a railroad fireman, brought an action against his employer, Southern Railway Co., under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. He alleged in his complaint that the defendant negligently caused him to slip and fall by leaving metal rods on a step leading to the cab of an engine in which he was working. The case was heard by a jury and a verdict was rendered for the defendant.

The charge to the jury was adequate and there was sufficient evidence offered to support its verdict. The testimony of Loan’s ex-wife, even if privileged, was merely cumulative. Independent witnesses abundantly established the facts testified to by the wife. The error of receiving her testimony, if it was error, was not in our opinion sufficient in the entire context of the trial to warrant reversal.

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Arden Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i)
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  March 10, 2005
    /s/ Richard S. ZimanRichard S. ZimanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Arden Realty, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

FILED

PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF ERIC C.

WAREHAM FOR ADMISSION TO THE

BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

APR 0 6 2021

Bovveri Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

Stet.. nf Mnrlana

ORDER

Eric C. Wareham has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on

Character and Fitness has certified that Wareham has provided the necessary

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion

under Rule V. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Eric C. Wareham may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this day of April, 2021.

04/06/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005
~

~-~A Jtisti ces
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,




1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
/s/ Arthur L. SmithArthur L. SmithPresident andChief Executive OfficerOctober 31, 2011
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1977 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to transport an individual employed at a medical facility of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs between a parking facility and the 

medical facility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ (for herself and Mr. RUTHERFORD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transport an individual 

employed at a medical facility of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs between a parking facility and the medical facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Priority Ac5 cess to Reliable Care Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘Veterans 

6 PARC Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1977 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYED 

2 AT A MEDICAL FACILITY OF THE DEPART3 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BETWEEN A 

4 PARKING FACILITY AND THE MEDICAL FA5 CILITY. 

6 Section 8109(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (3) by striking the period and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(4) notwithstanding section 1344 of title 31, 

14 may use a passenger carrier (as that term is defined 

15 in section 1344 of title 31) to transport such an em16 ployee between a parking facility and the medical fa17 cility of the Department at which the employee 

18 works.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Colvin Baking Company, Respondent, vs. Public Service Commission, Appellant.

*February 12*

April *27, 1937.*

For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General, H. T. Ferg-uson,*assistant attorney general, and *Philip H. Porter,*counsel for the Public Service Commission, and oral argument by *Mr. Porter.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Olin & Butler,*and oral argument by *Robert M. Rieser,*all of Madison.

The following opinion was filed March 9, 1937:

Per Curiam.

The case is ruled by the decision in *Gardner Baking Co. v. Public Service Comm., ante,*p. 588, 271 N. W. 833. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Martin, J., took no part.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on April 27, 1937.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Critical Area Planting, Early Successional Habitat Development/Mgt., Forest Stand Improvement, Forest Trails and Landings, Multi-Story Cropping, Prescribed Burning, Riparian Forest Buffer, Sediment Basin, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.