alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Career Development (K08) and Pathway to Independence 
(K99) Grant Applications.
    Date: March 3-4, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Division of 
Extramural Research, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#026a6d716a637560426f636b6e2c6c6b6a2c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31595e4259504653715c50585d1f5f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Clinical and Epidemiological Grant and Cooperative 
Agreement Applications.
    Date: March 17-18, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jeanette M Hosseini, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-
2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88e2ede9e6edfcfcede0c8e5e9e1e4a6e6e1e0a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="137976727d766767767b537e727a7f3d7d7a7b3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: February 3, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02439 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

On-Farm Secondary Containment (Code 319) 

A permanent facility designed to provide secondary

containment of oil and oil products used onfarm. 

Practice Information 

An on-farm secondary containment facility provides a

minimization of the risk of accidental release of stored oil

and petroleum products. These facilities control accidental

release of oil and petroleum products to prevent

contamination of groundwater and surface waters and

provide measures for a safe, effective, and timely cleanup of a spill or leak. 

Onfarm oil products include diesel fuel, gasoline, lube oil, hydraulic oil, adjuvant oil, crop oil, vegetable

oil, or animal fat, as identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Oil Spill,

Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulation. EPA’s SPCC regulation (40 CFR Part

112, “Oil Pollution Prevention”) provides the criteria for farms which require either a self-certified or

professional engineer prepared and certified SPCC plan. If required by 40 CFR 112, an SPCC plan

must be in place to implement this practice. 

Onfarm secondary containment facilities will contain a spill should one occur and provide a clean hard

or compacted surface where leaks can be easily detected. Facilities are located with due

consideration to farm traffic and away from streams, ponds, lakes, wetlands, sinkholes, and water

wells. 

Operation and required maintenance of the facility includes regular facility inspections for leaks and

condition of the facility, as well as the proper disposal of any spill catch. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) On-Farm Secondary Containment Facility (Code 319) is

commonly applied with other conservation practices such as NRCS CPSs Combustion System

Improvement (Code 372), Energy Efficient Agricultural Operation (Code 374), and Pumping Plant

(Code 533). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2






                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




TIB FINANCIAL CORP.
KEY LARGO, FLORIDA



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
13, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TIB Financial
Corp. and subsidiaries included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as
of and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the TIB Financial Corp. Incentive Stock
Option Plan and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan , as Amended.





                                                 /s/  BRICKER & MELTON, P.A
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Bricker & Melton, P.A.





Duluth, Georgia
March 26, 1999.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 6645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02539]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 6645]]

                Order of February 2, 2015

                
Sequestration Order for Fiscal Year 2016 Pursuant 
                to Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
                Deficit Control Act, as Amended

                By the authority vested in me as President by the laws 
                of the United States of America, and in accordance with 
                section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
                Deficit Control Act (the ``Act''), as amended, 2 U.S.C. 
                901a, I hereby order that, on October 1, 2015, direct 
                spending budgetary resources for fiscal year 2016 in 
                each non-exempt budget account be reduced by the amount 
                calculated by the Office of Management and Budget in 
                its report to the Congress of February 2, 2015.

                All sequestrations shall be made in strict accordance 
                with the requirements of section 251A of the Act and 
                the specifications of the Office of Management and 
                Budget's report of February 2, 2015, prepared pursuant 
                to section 251A(9) of the Act.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 2, 2015.

[FR Doc. 2015-02539
Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295-F5
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 6/15/2012

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Sample Number: 122487-001 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:00 Date Received: 6/6/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 394 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/11/2012 12:32 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122487-002 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:00 Date Received: 6/6/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 6.9 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/11/2012 12:37 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 122487-003 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:00 Date Received: 6/6/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Selenium, Se 0.9 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 06/11/2012 12:42 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Trisha Tucker, Chemist III

Email tltucker@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4184

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4184

Mountaineer Plant, 122487 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF OFFICEROF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) theundersigned officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(a)                                   Thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)                                  Informationcontained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: February 14, 2007 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ Jacob Inbar          |   |
| By: Jacob Inbar,         |
| Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements  at  February  29,  2000  and  is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial  statements.  Earnings
per share  information  has been presented to conform with the  requirements  of
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001003934
<NAME>                       Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Aug-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Sep-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Feb-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         760,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,412,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (999,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,275,000
<PP&E>                                         28,086,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,915,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,769,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,737,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,046,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,769,000
<SALES>                                        47,012,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,036,000
<CGS>                                          25,197,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,197,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,939,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               136,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,131,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,633,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   767,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            866,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   866,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.14


</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

1. Stabilization and protection of bank 

of natural streams, constructed 

channels, and shorelines of lakes, 

reservoirs, and estuaries1

I.4 (-) Nutrients 

and organics in 

surface water

D.2 (-) Loss of land or 

damage to adjacent 

facilities or land uses

C.4 (+/-) 

Recreational 

opportunities

C.2 (+/-) Aquatic and 

terrestrial habitat 

(streambank, shoreline, 

instream, riparian, etc.)

D.4 (+) Flow capacity of 

streams and channels 

C.5 (+/-) Income and income 

stability (individuals and 

community)

D.3 (-) Streambank/ 

shoreline erosion 

Initial setting: Areas of streambanks of 

natural or constructed channels and 

shorelines of lakes, reservoirs, or estuaries 

that are susceptible to erosion from the 

action of water, ice, debris, livestock, 

pedestrians, or vehicular traffic 

Start

I.5 (-) 

Turbidity 

(total 

suspended 

sediment) 

C.1 (+) Water quality

I.10 (+/-) 

Water quantity 

D.1 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance 

D.5 (+) Streambank vegetation and root matrix 

(where vegetative treatment is used or bank 

armoring does not restrict plant growth) 

I.6 (-) 

Sedimentation

I.1 (+/-) Net 

returns to 

landowner

I.2 (-) Annual 

costs or losses 

to

landowner

I.9 (+/-) Shade 

I.14 (+) Storage 

of organic matter/

soil carbon

I.11 (+/-) 

Water 

temperature

I.16 (-) 

Greenhouse 

gases

C.7 (+) Air 

quality

I.12 (+) 

Native plant seed 

recruitment

I.13 (-) Invasive/

noxious species 

(with vegetation 

management)

C.6 (+/-) Biodiversity

C.3 (+/-) Aquatic and terrestrial 

populations and diversity

Streambank and Shoreline 

Protection (580)

I.7 (+/-) 

Channel/floodplain 

dynamics2

I.8 (+/-) Riparian 

condition

Riparian Forest Buffer (391) 

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390)

I.15 (+) 

Soil quality

Pathway

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

I.3 (+) Land 

values

Notes: 

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) or minus (-). These symbols indicate only an increase (+) or 

a decrease (-) in the effect upon the resource, not whether the effect is beneficial or adverse.

Projects involving long lengths of bank or shoreline, structural controls, substantial earth 

moving and/or fill, or sensitive waters may need to be evaluated in a site-specific EA or 

EIS.

1 Additional information about potential protection measures and their impacts is available in the 

 EIS for the Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program.

2 Conventional bank armoring (e.g., rip rap, gabions) may result in decreased (-) channel/flood 

plain dynamics, and associated impacts, while other less intrusive methods (e.g., stream barbs,

stone toes with sloped, vegetated banks) may result in increased (+) channel/flood plain 

dynamics.
**Human Considerations Explanation**

PAGE  

4

Data from CPPE_National.xls
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Possession Licenses for Manufacturing and Distribution (NUREG-1556, Volume 12, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 12, Revision 1 (PDF – 3.95 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2018**Date Published:** May 2018

**Prepared by:**D. LawyerT. ThompsonC. FrazierM. SimmonsL. SepulvedaD. Samson

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and to assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for manufacturing and distribution licenses. In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to the NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Thompson, Appellant, vs. Bareis, Respondent.

For the appellant: *E. E. Burns*oí Platteville.

For the respondent: *Kopp & Brunckhorst*of Platteville.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Status of the Decommissioning Program (NUREG-1814)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2004262EN.01004201.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/42

---

Action brought on 19 July 2004 by Carlo Pagliacci against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-307/04)

(2004/C 262/80)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 19 July 2004 by Carlo Pagliacci, resident in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the jury in competition COM/A/1/02 awarding the applicant insufficient marks for him to be placed on the list of successful candidates; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the jury in competition COM/A/1/02 awarding the applicant insufficient marks for him to be placed on the list of successful candidates;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of his action, the applicant alleges an infringement of the competition notice, since a number of candidates placed on the list of those to have been successful did not possess the prescribed qualification, directly related to the sphere of agriculture. He also submits that one of the members of the jury worked with some of the candidates on a daily basis. In his submission, that fact placed the relevant candidates in a special situation by comparison with the other candidates and consequently entailed an infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Since it is alleged that the appointing authority had not been made aware of this situation, the applicant also relies on an infringement of Article 14 of the Staff Regulations on that basis.

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000047 09-FEB-2017 10:15 AM
#### M. L. BEARD and others v. JACK HALL and others.

*Parties*— Judgment.

Where a defendant in a civil action dies after verdict and before judgment, tte plaintiff is entitled to a judgment without waiting to make tte personal representatives or heirs of tte defendant, as tte case may be, parties to tte action.

Motion in the Cause by the plaintiffs heard at Chambers in Winston on the 21st of May, 1878, before *Cloud, J.*

The action in which this motion was made was originally brought in Rowan to subject certain real estate sold by virtue of a decree in equity to the payment of the purchase money. The plaintiffs moved for judgment in accordance with the verdict of the jury theretofore rendered. It was admitted that since the trial of the action the defendant Hall had died, and his personal representative had not been made a party defendant. His Honor held that the personal representative was a necessary party, and refused the motion, from which ruling the plaintiffs appealed.

*Messrs. Jones Johnston*and *W. H. Bailey,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. J. S. Henderson*and. *J. M.*McCorkle, for defendants.

*507Paircloth, J.

After the trial and verdict in favor of the plaintiff and before judgment entered, the defendant or one of them died. His Honor refused plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the ground that the personal representative of the deceased was a necessary party. In this there was error. A judgment is the legal conclusion upon facts found ■or admitted by the parties in the course of the action, to which the party (plaintiff in this instance) is entitled as a matter of course as- soon as the facts are so established. This is the rule of the common law, and we have found no statute enacting otherwise. 2 Tidd’s Practice, 932; 2 Daniel’s Ch. Pr., 1017; *Davies*v. *Davies,*9 Vesey, 461; *Campbell*v. *Mesier,*4 Johns., 341.

If after verdict the Court should take time to consider, as for argument, or on a motion in arrest, or for a new trial, &c., and meanwhile the party died, judgment will be entered in vacation, or at a subsequent term, *nune pro*tunc_ If this were not allowed, then a party would be prejudiced .and possibly damaged by the act of the Court. If by consent of parties, judgment is not entered but is delayed for a reasonable cause, the same rule would be applied if invoked within a reasonable time. It can work no harm to the interested parties as it would not affect any payments, or ■other cause of discharge arising after the time when the verdict was rendered. This must be the rule between the parties and their representatives. The question as to the effect of judgments entered in this way upon purchasers or ether third parties is not presented in the record or considered by this Court.

Error. . Reversed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated October 30, 2001, on the consolidated financial statements of Tanisys Technology, Inc. as of September 30, 2001, and for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, included in Tanisys Technology, Inc.’s Form 10-K/A file number 0-29038, into this Form 10-K for New Century Equity Holdings Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and into New Century’s previously filed Registration Statements (SEC File No. 333-08249, 333-08251, 333-11492, 333-30854, 333-30926, 333-36785, 333-37420, 333-55316, 333-66903, 333-70947 and 333-70951).

 

|                             |   |   | /s/ BROWN GRAHAM AND COMPANY P.C. |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
| Austin, TexasMarch 26, 2003 |   |   |                              |

 

----
ACCEPTED

12-16-00133-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

5/12/2016 8:35:22 AM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/12/2016 8:35:22 AM PAM ESTES Clerk