### 81237 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices

affecting the product or the absence of a notice of requirements for the children’s product, the Commission has decided to continue the stay of enforcement for consumer products or children’s products listed below. ’’ 74 FR at 68591. We noted that the stay on CPSIA testing and certification did not extend to compliance with the applicable mandatory safety requirements; thus, the stay did not extend to guarantees under the Flammable Fabrics Act. 74 FR at 68589, 68591. The products identified in part II.D of the December 28, 2009 notice included:

• Carpets and rugs (16 CFR parts 1630 and 1631);

• Vinyl plastic film (16 CFR part 1611); and

• Wearing apparel (16 CFR part 1610).

74 FR at 68591. The Commission also explained that:

The Commission intends to require testing and certification of these products once it completes the rulemakings associated with the products, issues notices of requirements, or otherwise resolves the issues that have warranted a continuation of the stay of enforcement for the products. 74 FR at 68591 through 68592.

In July and August 2010, the Commission issued notices of requirements for these products. The notice of requirements pertaining to vinyl plastic film and carpets and rugs appeared in the Federal Register of July 21, 2010. 75 FR 42311 (vinyl plastic film); 75 FR 42315 (carpets and rugs). The notice of requirements pertaining to clothing textiles (referred to as ‘‘wearing apparel’’ in the December 28, 2009 notice) appeared in the Federal Register of August 18, 2010. 75 FR 51016. Each notice of requirements described the stay of enforcement and then declared that the publication of the notice of requirements had the effect of lifting the stay of enforcement. For example, in the notice of requirements pertaining to clothing textiles, the Commission stated:

As the factor preventing the stay from being lifted in the December 28, 2009, notice with regard to testing and certifications of clothing textiles was the absence of a notice of requirements, publication of this notice has the effect of lifting the stay with regard to 16 CFR part 1610. 75 FR at 51018. In relation to lifting the stay, each notice of requirements also described when manufacturers of children’s products subject to the respective regulations would be required to certify their products based on third party testing.

Recently, various parties have contacted CPSC staff to ask whether the stay of enforcement had been lifted with respect to non-children’s products subject to the cited CPSC regulations pertaining to vinyl plastic film, carpets and rugs, and clothing textiles. Although some manufacturers interpreted the notices of requirements as lifting the stay of enforcement with respect to both non-children’s and children’s products, others interpreted the text as applying only to children’s products. Other parties informed CPSC staff that they did not consider reading the notices of requirements for information relevant to manufacturers because the notices of requirements provide the criteria and process for Commission acceptance of accreditation of third party laboratories for testing pursuant to CPSC regulations.

Given the apparent confusion about whether the stay of enforcement for non-children’s products subject to the cited CPSC regulations pertaining to vinyl plastic film, carpets and rugs, and clothing textiles has been lifted, the Commission, through this notice, is announcing that the stay of enforcement pertaining to the certification undersection 14(a)(1) of the CPSA for nonchildren’s products will be lifted as of January 26, 2011. Thus, after January 26,2011, every manufacturer of a nonchildren’s product (and the private labeler of such product if such product bears a private label) subject to CPSC regulations pertaining to:

• Carpets and rugs (16 CFR parts 1630 and 1631),

• Vinyl plastic film (16 CFR part 1611) or

• Wearing apparel (16 CFR part 1610), whose product is imported for consumption or warehousing or distributed in commerce, must issue a certificate for that product. (The term

‘‘manufacturer’’ includes importers (see 16 CFR part 1110).)

Dated: December 17, 2010. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010–32181 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket ID DOD–2010–OS–0171]**

**Proposed Collection; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness),
DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice. **SUMMARY :**  In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) announces the following proposed reinstatement of a public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 25,

2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC

20301–1160.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness)(Military Personnel Policy)/ Accession Policy, Attn: Major Arturo Roque, or call (703) 695–5527.

Title, Associated Form, and OMB Control Number: Request for Verification of Birth, DD Form 372, OMB Control Number: 0704–0006.

Needs and Uses: Title 10, USC 505, 532, 3253, and 8253, require applicants meet minimum and maximum age and citizenship requirements for enlistment into the Armed Forces (including the Coast Guard). If an applicant is unable


### 81238 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices

to provide a birth certificate, the recruiter will forward a DD Form 372,

‘‘Request for Verification of Birth,’’ to a state or local agency requesting verification of the applicant’s birth date. This verification of the birth date ensures that the applicant does not fall outside the age limitations, and the applicants place of birth supports the citizenship status claimed by the applicant.

Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal
Government.

Annual Burden Hours: 8,200 hours. Number of Respondents: 140,000. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Burden per Response: .058 hours.

Frequency: On occasion.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Summary of Information Collection

This information provides the Armed Services with the exact birth date of an applicant. The DD Form 372 is the method of collecting and verifying birth date on applicants who are unable to provide a birth certificate from their city, county, or state. The DD Form 372 is considered the official request for obtaining the birth date on applicants.

Dated: December 20, 2010. Morgan F. Park, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–32384 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DOD–2010–DARS–0180]**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 26, 2011.

Title, Associated Forms and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 244, Subcontracting Policies and Procedures; OMB Control Number

0704–0253.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 90. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 90. Average Burden per Response: 16 hours.

Annual Burden Hours: 1,440 hours. Needs and Uses: Administrative contracting officers use this information in making decisions to grant, withhold, or withdraw purchasing system approval at the conclusion of a purchasing system review. Withdrawal of purchasing system approval would
necessitate Government consent to individual subcontracts.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; not-for-profit institutions.

Frequency: On Occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209–2133.

Dated: November 30, 2010. Morgan F. Park, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–32385 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DOD–2010–DARS–0179]**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  DoD. **ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 26, 2011.

Title, Associated Forms and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 215.4, Contract Pricing; DD Form 1861, Contract Facilities Capital Cost of Money; OMB Control Number

0704–0232.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 10,300. Responses per Respondent: approximately 5.

Annual Responses: 53,458. Average Burden per Response: 10 hours.

Annual Burden Hours: 538,480 hours. Needs and Uses: DoD contracting officers use DD Form 1861 in computing profit objectives for negotiated contracts. A DD Form 1861 is normally completed for each proposal for a contract for supplies or services that is priced and negotiated on the basis of cost analysis. The form enables contracting officers to differentiate profit objectives for various types of contractor assets (land, buildings, equipment). DoD needs this information to develop appropriate profit objectives when negotiating Government contracts.

DoD contracting officers need the information required by DFARS 215.407–5, Estimating systems, and the related contract clause at 252.215–7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements, to determine if a contractor has an acceptable system for generating cost estimates, and to monitor the correction of any deficiencies.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.

Frequency: On Occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket