**Meeting Notes**
**— Abamectin**  **FOCUS meetings 2/14/2013**  **-- W**  **ith Cheminova, Nufarm, Tide, Ensystex III, Celsius Property, Tree Care Science, and Rotam**  **2/20/2013**
**— With Syngenta**  **Topics Discussed:** 
 **Registration review schedule:** reg review docket opens 6/19/13; FWP publication August 2013; DCI expected to be issued August 2014

 **Planned data requirements for abamectin’s registration review** 

human health: 1) immunotox

—

waiver will be submitted for this study 2) subchronic inhalatio n toxicity -- waived 3) subchronic dermal toxicity study -- waived ecological fate and effects: 1) aqueous photolysis 2) soil photolysis 3) aerobic soil metabolism 4) aerobic aquatic metabolism 5) anaerobic aquatic metabolism 6) anaerobic soil metabolism 7) 8 50.2100 acute oral toxicity to passerine birds 8) 850.1300 daphnia chronic toxicity 9) 850.3030 and 850.3040 field and residue effects on honeybees 10) 850.5400 algal toxicity 11) 850.4400 aquatic plant toxicity 12) oyster acute toxicity or bivalve acute toxicity 13) aquatic invertebrate acute toxicity with daphnia 14) fish acute toxicity -- freshwater and marine 15) whole sediment toxicity -- chronic invertebrates freshwater and marine 16) avian reproduction 17) 850.1400 early life - stage toxicity 18) seedlin g emergence 19) vegetative vigor

 EPA emphasized the n eed for a master label table . EPA will send a template for registrants’ use  EPA requested production data for non - agricultural uses of abamectin

— annual usage data also helpful ; especially turf and ornamental use info (on a national level)  EPA requested clearer labels with respect to some application parameters such as interval between applications, mimimum retreatment interval, and maxim um number of applications/year, and total mass a.i. applied per year EPA discussed the n eed for pollinator data

— perhaps from open literature or from the EU  EPA said registrants could submit o pen literature data (if available) for other data gaps  EPA discussed other outstanding label issues for abamectin o **Gra pe REI (for inclusion on labels with use on grapes):**  “Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted - entry interval (REI) of 12 hours. Exception: For grape girdling, cane turning, and tying in grapes, do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted - entry interv al (REI) of 4 days.”
o **New environmental hazard language (for outdoor broadcast uses):**  “This pesticide is toxic to fish and wildlife. For terrestrial uses: do not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present, or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply when weather conditions favor drift from target areas. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment wash water or rinsate. This product is hig hly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment or residues on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds if bees are visiting the treatment area. Use of this product may pose a risk to threatened and endangered species of fish, amphibians, crustaceans (including fresh water shrimp), and insects. All use of this product in the state of California should comply with the recommendations of the California Endangered Species Project. Before using this produ ct in California, consult with your county agriculture commissioner to determine use limitations that apply in your area. This product may impact surface water quality due to runoff of rain water. This is especially true for poorly draining soils and soil s with shallow ground water. This product is classified as having a medium potential for reaching both surface water and aquatic sediment via runoff for several weeks to months after application. A level, well maintained vegetative buffer strip between are as to which this product is applied and surface water features such as ponds, streams, and springs will reduce the potential loading of abamectin from runoff water and sediment. Runoff of this product will be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall is forecast to occur within 48 hours.”
o **How to express quantities and maximum on labels for fire ant bait/granules :**  Here are some of the directions showing how to express the rates per mound, per acre, when to use each, and the ultimate limit. This is tak en from reg num 100 - 894 which is a 0.011% granular. We 've expressed limits as lb a.i. but you could translate to quantity of product (eg. 1 lb product/A). This is for a commercial use; if using residential landscapes then you can leave the buffer strip t ext off. There are other directions on this particular label, we’ ve j ust excerpted some parts. MOUND TREATMENT- Use 5

– 7 tablespoons per fire ant mound. Sprinkle the bait uniformly in a circle around the base of the mound out to a distance of approxim ately 2 to 4 feet.

- Maximum Amount per Application: Do not treat more than 12 ant mounds per acre. If there are more than 12 mounds per acre to be treated then follow broadcast application directions. (We came up with the 12 mound limit by converting the 7Tbl per mound to a net a.i. per X square feet and found that if you went beyond the 12 mounds you’d be over the 0.01 lb a.i./A limit.) BROADCAST TREATMENT

- Apply 0.0 00 11 lb a.i./A using ground or aerial application. RESTRICTIONS

- Buffer zone: To avoid hazard to aquatic organisms, do not apply within 25 feet of lakes, reservoirs, rivers, permanent streams, marshes, potholes, natural ponds, estuaries, or commercial fish ponds.

- Maximum Amount per Application: Do not apply more than .0 00 1 1 lb a.i . per acre per application.

- Application Interval: When reinfestation occurs or when very large mounds remain active, areas may be retreated 3 to 4 months after the previous application; however do not exceed the maximum amount permitted per year.

- Maximum Amount per Year: Do not apply more than 4 applications per acre per year (0.0 004 4 lb a.i. per acre per year).