alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Heera Lee, certifythat:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change inthe small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November  14, 2007     |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Heera Lee                |
| By:  Heera Lee          |
| Director of Finance and      |
| Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report for the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio (NUREG-1851)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1851 (PDF - 18.2 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2006 **Date Published:**September 2006

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The report documents the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review and safety and safeguards evaluation of USEC Inc.'s (USEC's) application for a license to construct a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility and possess and use special nuclear material (SNM), source material, and byproduct material. USEC proposes that the gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility be located on the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) reservation in Piketon, Ohio. The facility will possess natural, depleted, and enriched uranium, and will be authorized to enrich uranium up to a maximum of 10 weight percent uranium-235.

The objective of this review is to evaluate the facility's potential adverse impacts on worker and public health and safety, under both normal operating and accident conditions. The review also considers physical protection of SNM and classified matter, material control and accounting of SNM, and the management organization, administrative programs, and financial qualifications provided to ensure safe design and operation of the facility.

NRC staff concludes, in this safety evaluation report, that the applicant's descriptions, specifications, and analyses provide an adequate basis for safety and safeguards of facility operations and that operation of the facility does not pose an undue risk to worker and public health and safety.

Potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed facility and its reasonable alternatives are addressed in a separate document, Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio, NUREG-1834, which was made available to the public in April 2006.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Enterprise Content Management: Streamlining How Staff and Stakeholders Work within the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Environment (NUREG-1954)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1954 (PDF - 602.66 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2010**Date Published:** September 2010

**Prepared by:**

Office of Information ServicesU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides staff and stakeholders with an understanding of Enterprise Content Management (ECM), describes the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) planned ECM Program, and discusses how this ECM Program will provide critical support to the NRC's mission and streamline the work of staff and stakeholders within the NRC's regulatory environment. ECM is the ability of an organization to capture, manage, store, preserve, anddeliver needed information so that it is available to the right people at the right time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH HOME FINANCIAL CORP.
<CURRENCY> 9,828,458
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,011,891
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,816,567
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             2,300,013
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                127,198,445
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,004,302
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,071,200
<LOANS>                                    208,017,763
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,567,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             372,533,206
<DEPOSITS>                                 148,453,810
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,586,289
<LONG-TERM>                                166,516,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,813,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             372,533,206
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,872,912
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,540,470
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               267,961
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,681,343
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,117,539
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,769,179
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,912,164
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  360,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             188,333
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,812,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,411,203
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,576,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.59
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,546,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,546,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,419,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  262,076
<RECOVERIES>                                    50,072
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,567,192
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAUDE SLOAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big 

Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:18-cr-00004-JPJ-1)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Claude Sloan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act 

of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the 

record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Sloan’s 

motion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) (stating 

standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States 

v. Sloan, No. 2:18-cr-00004-JPJ (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2020).∗ We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ This ruling is limited to Sloan’s appeal of the district court’s March 6, 2020, order. 

Sloan’s subsequent appeal of the district court’s July 16, 2020, order remains pending.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,606
<PP&E>                                         546,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,022
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                     331,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   551,256
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (13,105)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3(ii)(a)


                               CORPORATE ACTION BY
                              ALL THE DIRECTORS OF
                          GUARDIAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.

         The undersigned, being all the Directors of Guardian International,
Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Corporation"), do hereby waive all formal
requirements, including the necessity of holding a formal or informal meeting,
and any requirements for notice; and do hereby consent in writing to the
adoption of the following resolutions, taking said action in lieu of a meeting
of the Board of Directors in accordance with the corporation laws of the State
of Nevada.

AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

         WHEREAS, the Corporation entered into that certain Agreement and Plan
of Merger dated August l5, 1996 ("Merger Agreement"), whereby Guardian
International, Inc., a Florida corporation, merged into Everest Security Systems
Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Everest"), which corporation changed its
name to "Guardian International, Inc." pursuant to the Merger Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, Section 1.4 of the Merger Agreement provides that the bylaws
of Everest shall be the bylaws of the Corporation, except that such bylaws shall
be amended to the extent necessary to effectuate the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, Article XI of the bylaws of Everest requires the vote of a
majority of the stockholders of the Corporation to amend the bylaws, and

         WHEREAS, a majority of the stockholders of the Corporation have
approved all the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement at a meeting of
the stockholders of the Corporation held on July 5, 1996, and therefore have
approved the amendment to the bylaws to the extent necessary to effectuate the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the bylaws of the Corporation are
hereby amended to reflect that the name of the Corporation shall be "Guardian
International, Inc."

         BE IT FURTHER Resolved, that Section 2 of Article III of the
Corporation's bylaws is hereby amended to provide that the number of directors
of the Corporation shall be three.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all the Directors of this
Corporation, have hereunto set their hands for the purposes herein expressed.

         Dated as of August 15, 1996.


DIRECTORS:

/s/ HAROLD GINSBURG
-----------------------------
Harold Ginsburg


/s/ RICHARD GINSBURG
-----------------------------
Richard Ginsburg


/s/ SHEILAH GINSBURG
-----------------------------
Sheilah Ginsburg
# Open Channel (Ft.) (582) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Open Channel (Ft.) (582) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Open Channel (Ft.) (582).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Open Channel (Ft.) (582) (9/15) Standard Document(186.11 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Open Channel (Ft.) (582) Overview(91.25 KB)

Open Channel (Ft.) (582) CPPE(24.9 KB)

Open Channel (Ft.) (582) Network Diagram(30.12 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
----

               JUDGMENT OF THE COURT            

(Fourth Chamber)

of 24 June 2004            

in Case C-119/02: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Second subparagraph of Article 3(1) and Article 5(2) of Directive 91/271/EEC - Discharge of urban waste water into a sensitive area - Lack of a collecting system - Lack of treatment more stringent than the secondary treatment provided for in Article 4 of the Directive)

(2004/C 201/04)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-119/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and M. Konstantinidis) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: E. Skandalou) — application for a declaration that, by not taking the measures necessary for the installation of a collecting system for urban waste water from the area of Thriasio Pedio and not subjecting urban waste water from that area to treatment more stringent than secondary treatment before its discharge into the sensitive area of the Gulf of Elefsina, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3(1) and 5(2) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), as amended by Commission Directive 98/15/EC of 27 February 1998 (OJ 1998 L 67, p. 29) — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 24 June 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 131, 1.6.2002.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE chief FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending July 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada
Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



|1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and result of operations of the Company.



|By | /s/
    Antonio Estrada Jr. | 
|-- | --------------------------- | 
|   | Antonio
    Estrada Jr.     | 
|   | Chief
    Financial Officer | 
|   | December
    14, 2017       |
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****By****PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer****RegardingFacts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings**

 

I, Susan Fite, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 

Date:  August 12, 2003

 

 
|   |                 |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | /s/ Susan Fite       |   |
|   | Director of  Finance |   |

 

----