alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,170
<SECURITIES>                                    14,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                        99
<INVENTORY>                                      1,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,103
<PP&E>                                           2,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                     809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,662
<SALES>                                          3,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,414
<CGS>                                            1,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)
        

</TABLE>
# Rhode Island State Office

60 Quaker Ln, Ste 40WarwickRI02886-0181

401-828-1300

60 Quaker Ln, Ste 40WarwickRI02886-0181

Rhode Island

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Rhode Island 
-  Rhode Island State Office 

Welcome! The Rhode Island State Office in Warwick, RI is the state headquarters for NRCS operations in the Ocean State. If you're a farmer or forestland owner looking for help, please contact your local NRCS field office at a USDA Service Center. 

## **Welcome to NRCS in Rhode Island!**

### ***Phou Vongkhamdy, State Conservationist***

Rhode Island NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, serves diverse agricultural needs through three Field Offices and our State Office. We provide voluntary, cost-effective technical and financial assistance to farmers, forest landowners, and urban growers to conserve, protect and improve soil, water, air, plants and animals. In doing so, we enable our clients and partners to better steward and manage their land.

#### How to find your local Rhode Island NRCS office: 

          -  Rhode Island NRCS - Conservation District Map with Contact Info(173.98 KB) 
          - visit our  USDA Service Center Locator . 

View our most recent Annual Report & Legislative Factsheet to learn about how we're serving the people of Rhode Island:  

RI NRCS Annual Accomplishments Summary At-A-Glance(2.24 MB)

Rhode Island NRCS FY23 Legislative Factsheet(261.19 KB)

----

## **ALERT:** Rhode Island USDA Service Center Phone Line Issues

Phone lines for Rhode Island USDA Service Center agencies (FSA, RD & NRCS) are currently having network issues. If you cannot get through to us on our landlines, please call us on our government cell phones or visit us online!

### Natural Resources Conservation Service

•    Eastern RI Field Office (Ghyllian Alger, DC): 401-255-6210•    Northern RI Field Office (Kate Bousquet, DC): 401-255-6212•    Southern RI Field Office (Jameson Long, DC): 401-793-0230•    Outreach & Public Affairs (Julie Wright): 401-786-3884

### Farm Service Agency

•    County Office & Programs: 401-222-0821•    Loan Office: 401-215-5875•    Website: https://www.fsa.usda.gov/state-offices/Rhode-Island/

## Key Contacts

### R. Phou Vongkhamdy

                -    401-828-1300 
                -    pooh.vongkhamdy@usda.gov 

----

##   Rhode Island NRCS State Office Employee Directory
# C_2004300EN.01005102.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/51

---

Action brought on 6 October 2004 by Jean-Paul Keppenne against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-411/04)

(2004/C 300/100)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 October 2004 by Jean-Paul Keppenne, residing in Etterbeek (Belgium), represented by Paul-Emmanuel Ghislain, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions by the Commission not to increase the number of DG priority points awarded to the applicant in the context of the 2003 appraisal and not to promote the applicant to Grade A5 during the 2003 promotions exercise, together with the appointing authority's decision replying to the applicant's objections (R/673/03 and R/716/03); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions by the Commission not to increase the number of DG priority points awarded to the applicant in the context of the 2003 appraisal and not to promote the applicant to Grade A5 during the 2003 promotions exercise, together with the appointing authority's decision replying to the applicant's objections (R/673/03 and R/716/03);

| — | order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 3 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered by him; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 3 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered by him;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action follows on from that in Case T-272/04 which challenged the tacit decision rejecting the complaints submitted by the same applicant. Since the appointing authority finally adopted express rejection decisions, it is specifically those decisions whose annulment is sought in the present case.

In support of his claims, the applicant essentially maintains that the decisions at issue constitute a disguised sanction imposed on the applicant, owing to his secondment in the interests of the service to the Court of Justice, and did not take appropriate account of his merits.

The pleas raised in the application are based on infringement of the rules governing the appraisal and promotion of officials, the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality, and on an allegation of a misuse of powers.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4683

_____________________________
M ARVIN E UGENE W ATTS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. June 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and W INOKUR and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marvin Eugene Watts, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

p0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142729

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 142729 ADB: 09-43-GA RAYMOND A. MACDONALD, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 1, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00458

- CV

Axelle Francine PARKER

, Appellant

v. William A. PARKER II, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI15237

Honorable Karen H. Pozza , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal. The clerk’s record was due on September 25, 2020. The

trial court clerk has filed a notification of late clerk’s record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk ’ s record and that the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee

.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to t his court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee for preparing the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk ’ s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be

dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution if clerk’s record is not filed due to appellant’s fault); see als o T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

______________________________ ___ Liz a A. Rodriguez , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of October, 2020

.

__________________________ _________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# C_2004201EN.01001502.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne by judgment of that Tribunal of 5 April 2004 in the case of SAS Bricorama France against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC

(Case C-276/04)

(2004/C 201/31)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne (Saint-Etienne Social Security Tribunal) (France) of 5 April 2004, received at the Court Registry on 29 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of SAS Bricorama France against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC.

The Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne asks the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give a preliminary ruling on the following question:

Should Article 87 EC be interpreted as meaning that State funding by France through the Comité Professionnel de la Distribution des Carburants (Fuel Distributors' Trade Committee) (‘the CPDC’) and through the Fonds d'Intervention pour la Sauvegarde de l'Artisanat et du Commerce (Intervention Fund for the Support of Crafts and Trade) (‘the FISAC’) by way of assistance when self-employed craftsmen and traders retire and grants made to the old-age insurance scheme for self-employed persons in manufacturing and trading occupations, and to the scheme for self-employed persons in the craft sector constitute State aid?

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial 
Review Group; Mental Health Services Research Committee.
    Date: March 4, 2015.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street NW., Washington, DC 
20036.
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6136, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f5e7f7fce1f8e0f1d4f9f5fdf8bafafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d5c7d7dcc1d8c0d1f4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Carolyn A. Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01987 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2283

MAMIE L. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-03-1725-3) Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: July 8, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mamie L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Derwood Lorraine Aydlette, III, Christopher Wofford Johnson, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Jackson does not challenge on appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Appellee on its counterclaim and, therefore, has waived appellate review of that issue. 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Mamie L. Jackson appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her employment discrimination action for failure to comply with the court’s prior orders imposing sanctions and compelling discovery. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of S.C. , No. CA-03- 1725-3 (D.S.C. filed June 23, 2004 & entered June 24, 2004; filed Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004; filed Sept. 16, 2004 & entered Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      AltiGen Communications, Inc.




Date:
                February 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Gilbert HuName:
            Gilbert
                HuTitle:
            Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                           INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.

    Statement Regarding Computation of Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                Three months ended                 Nine months ended
                                                    September 30,                     September 30,
                                               ------------------------           -------------------
                                                 1996             1995             1996          1995
                                                ------           ------           ------        ------
                                                      (unaudited)                      (unaudited)
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss                                         $(1,019,000)  $ (961,000)     $(3,133,000)  $(2,663,000)
                                                 ============  ===========     ============  ============
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding:
 
     a.   Shares attributable to common   
             stock outstanding                     7,260,408    1,811,478        4,127,967     1,811,478
 
     b.   Shares attributable to
             mandatorily convertible 
             preferred stock                                    2,881,624        2,029,499     2,881,624
 
     c.   Shares attributable to common
             stock options pursuant to                           
              APB 15 and SAB 83                                   126,438           42,146       126,438
                                                 ------------  -----------     ------------  ------------ 
Weighted average common shares                   
  outstanding                                      7,260,408    4,819,540        6,199,612     4,819,540
                                                 ============  ===========     ============  ============
 
Net loss per share unaudited proforma net 
  loss per share                                      $(0.14)      $(0.20)          $(0.51)       $(0.55)
                                                 ============  ===========     ============  ============
 
</TABLE>
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Rock Wall Terrace (Code 555) 

A rock wall terrace is a retaining wall constructed of rock

across the slope to form and support a bench terrace on

sloping land. 

Practice Information 

Rock wall terraces are applicable to sloping land suitable

for cultivation where the soil depth is adequate for

benching. The slopes can be as much as 50 percent, which

means each 100 feet across the slope would have an

elevation difference of approximately 50 feet. Therefore, this practice can provide acceptable stability

on very steep cultivated soils. 

The purpose of a rock wall terrace is to stabilize steeply sloping land to allow cultivation with an

acceptable level of erosion. In addition to erosion control, the practice provides improved water-use

efficiency and other favorable hydrologic effects. 

Rock wall terraces require careful design, layout, and construction. 

A rock wall terrace will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Rock Wall Terrace (Code 555) is commonly applied

with other conservation practices, such as NRCS CPSs Conservation Crop Rotation (Code 328),

Terrace (Code 600), Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Code 345), Residue and Tillage

Management, No-Till (Code 329), Grassed Waterway (412), and Underground Outlet (620). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 18, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William D. Davis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William D. Davis

---