alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34


      Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 27, 1996 (the "Amendment") to Master
                Security Agreement dated as of October 24, 1996
                       (the "Master Security Agreement")
               between the CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. as
          Secured Party, and Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. as Debtor


Secured Party and Debtor desire, pursuant to the terms hereof, to amend the 
Master Security Agreement as follows:

1.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Master Security
    Agreement, the parties agree that each Schedule executed in accordance with
    the Master Security Agreement shall: (a) incorporate all of the terms and
    conditions of the Master Security Agreement, (b) contain such additional
    terms that the parties shall agree upon and, (c) constitute an agreement
    separate and distinct from the Master Security Agreement and any other
    Schedule.

2.  In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Master Security
    Agreement and a Schedule, the provisions of the Schedule shall prevail with
    respect to that Schedule.

3.  This Amendment shall govern any and all Schedules executed in accordance
    with the Master Security Agreement whether now or hereafter executed.

4.  Miscellaneous

    (a) All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have
    the same definitions as set forth in the Master Security Agreement. 

    (b) This Amendment shall be binding on the parties hereto and their
    respective successors and assigns.

    (c) This Amendment may be executed in counterparts with the same effect as
    if all parties had signed the same document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the 
day and year first above written.


Secured Party:                             Debtor:
The CIT Group/Equipment                     Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.
Financing, Inc.

By: /s/ J.E. PALMER                         By:   /s/ Gage Parrish        
   ------------------------------------          --------------------------

Title: SENIOR CREDIT OPERATIONS MANAGER     Title:    VP & CFO             
      ---------------------------------           -------------------------
Exhibit 11.1

                CAPITAL FACTORS HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



Primary                                       1996         1995        1994
-------                                    -----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                 11,044,809  10,000,000  10,000,000
Common equivalent shares
  outstanding - options                              0           0           0
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
Total common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                        11,044,809  10,000,000  10,000,000
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========

Net income                                  11,115,224   8,693,097   6,092,096
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
Primary earnings per share                 $      1.01  $     0.87  $     0.61
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========

Fully diluted
-------------
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                 11,044,809  10,000,000  10,000,000
Common equivalent shares
  outstanding - options                        183,200           0           0
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
Total common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                        11,228,009  10,000,000  10,000,000
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========

Net income                                  11,115,224   8,693,097   6,092,096
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
Fully diluted earnings per share           $      0.99  $     0.87  $     0.61
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Pensacola Aviation Center, LLC, 

Complainant 

v. 

Pensacola International Airport, 

City of Pensacola, FL 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-12 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the 

Rules of Practice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport 

Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter 

is hereby extended to on or before June, 21 2016. 

f/161/ 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 26, 2016, I served via Certified mail a true copy of 

the FAA's Notice of Extension ofTime, addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (516) 364-1095 

Fax: (516) 364-0612 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Robert J. Williams, Esq. 

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP 

Fifth Avenue Place 

120 Fifth A venue, Suite 2700 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 

Tel: (412) 577-5223 

Fax: (412) 765-3858 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, (AC0-1 00) 

11 "\ 

~~~~ Offtce of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
# C_2004183EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 July 2004

(2004/C 183/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2374 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4351 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6677 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1955 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5264 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,13 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5819 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,394 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6627 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4265 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,426 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 949 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,83 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,88 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 773 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7102 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6381 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6514 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,903 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1114 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5339 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2374

JPY

Japanese yen

134,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4351

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6677

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1955

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5264

ISK

Iceland króna

88,13

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5819

CZK

Czech koruna

31,394

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6627

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4265

PLN

Polish zloty

4,426

ROL

Romanian leu

40 949

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,83

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,88

TRL

Turkish lira

1 773 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7102

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6381

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6514

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,903

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1114

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,81

ZAR

South African rand

7,5339

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004210EN.01000101.xml

| 20.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 August 2004

(2004/C 210/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2359 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5349 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,58 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2945 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,57780 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,655 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6637 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4276 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4655 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 070 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240,0300 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,132 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 811 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7124 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6111 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6395 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8523 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1125 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 427,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0747 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2359

JPY

Japanese yen

135,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67655

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5349

ISK

Iceland króna

87,58

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2945

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,57780

CZK

Czech koruna

31,655

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6637

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4276

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4655

ROL

Romanian leu

41 070

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240,0300

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,132

TRL

Turkish lira

1 811 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7124

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6111

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6395

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8523

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1125

KRW

South Korean won

1 427,65

ZAR

South African rand

8,0747

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Parts 46 and 52
          - [FAC 2005-80; Technical Amendments; Corrections; Docket 2014-0053; Sequence No. 5]

# AGENCIES: 

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Final rule; corrections.

# SUMMARY:

                        DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing corrections to the Technical Amendments; (Item III), which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 80 FR 4994, January 29, 2015.                    

# DATES:

*Effective:*                         March 2, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20405, 202-501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite FAC 2005-80, Technical Amendments; Corrections.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Corrections

                    In rule FR Doc. 2015-01526 published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 80 FR 4994, January 29, 2015, make the following corrections:                

1. On page 4994, in the second column, line 12, correct “(Jan 2014)” to read “(Mar 2015)”.

2. On page 4994, in the second column, line 43, correct “(Jan 2015)” to read “(Mar 2015)”.

Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.

Dated: February 3, 2015.

William Clark,

Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02529 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
# I I 

# I Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Sent: To: Subject: AshleyTangonan <ash679@hawaii.edu> Tuesday, November26, 2013 10:42 PM Faulk, Scott (OST); EAS (OST) EAS Kaulapapa

Dear Department ofTransportation, :;

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lowerfares, experienced friendly agents, frequentflights, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distribution System. It is importantwe have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. Itravel 2 x a week on mokulele airlinesfor bussiness,and there flight availability is whatworks. All the other islands depends on a reliable flight service. Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years Mahala, Pualani Tangonan

1
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TOSHIBA CORPORATION, Appellant

v.
OPTICAL DEVICES, LLC , Appellee

______________________
2016

- 2012, 2016

- 2013, 2016

- 2014

______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trad emark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s

. IPR2014

- 01445, IPR2014

- 01446, IPR2014

- 01447.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
S TANLEY J OSEPH P ANIKOWSKI , III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by M ARK D. F OWLER , A LAN L IMBACH , C ARRIE L YNNE W ILLIAMSON , B RENT Y AMASHITA , East Palo Alto, CA.

S TEPHEN J ON T YTRAN , Scenera Research LLC, Port smouth, NH , argued for appellee. Also represented by T HEODOSIOS T HOMAS

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , S CHALL , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 15, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Learning Care Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 23, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William D. Davis, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
  The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ William D. DavisWilliam D. Davis, President and
  Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 3, 2004
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.10

Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated June 27, 1997, between Registrant and
T. Wade Fallin

    This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made as of the 20th day of May,
1999, by and between Alan Chervitz (the "Employee") and Innovasive Devices,
Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company").

1.  The Employee and the Company are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as
of June 27, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement"). The Employee and the Company are
also parties to an Income Continuation Agreement date as of April 6th, 1999 (the
"Income Continuation Agreement"). The Employee and the Company wish to amend the
Employment Agreement and the Income Continuation Agreement to avoid certain
inconsistencies in the Employment Agreement and the Income Continuation
Agreement.

2.  The Employee and the Company agree that if the Employee becomes entitled to
receive Income Continuance Payments (as defined in the Income Continuation
Agreement) in the circumstances described in Article III of the Income
Continuation Agreement, the provisions of the Income Continuation Agreement
shall govern and the employee and the Company will not be subject to the
provisions of Section 4(a) and 5 of the Employment Agreement. In such an event,
the payment by the Company of Income Continuation Payments shall be deemed to be
payments required under Section 5 (I) of the Employment Agreement for the
purpose of Section 6(a) of the Employment Agreement.

3.  In all other circumstances, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect as written.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have caused this amendment to Employment
Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above
written.

   _______________
    T. Wade Fallin                     INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.

                                         By:
                                         Name:  Richard D. Randall
                                         Title: President and CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                     3953099
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4258226
<PP&E>                                      411058
<DEPRECIATION>                               35516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4634965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1153179
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  28020
<COMMON>                                    158154
<OTHER-SE>                                 3295612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4634965
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5841554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5806854)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5808454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5808454)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.80)


</TABLE>
*April 2, 1935.*

#### Zentner, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Harold G. Olsen,*attorney, and *Ronold A. Drechsler*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents J. Laskin & Son and another: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Michael J. Dee, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. ; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 14, 2006