alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Equity Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements - Fiscal Year 2022

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Equity Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements - Fiscal Year 2022 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) invested $50 million in 118 partnerships to expand access to conservation assistance for climate-smart agriculture and forestry in fiscal year 2022.

## What are Equity Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements?

The Equity Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements, administered by USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) fund two-year projects to expand the delivery of conservation assistance to farmers who are new to farming, low income, socially disadvantaged or military veterans. Projects support USDA’s broader effort to address climate change and equitable access to programs. The program encourages new partnerships and the development of state and community leadership for underserved producers. Here is a list of the agreements selected for funding in fiscal year 2022.

## Fiscal Year 2022 cooperative agreements

View in list format...

##   Related Content

Equity in Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements
The Equity in Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements fund projects to expand the delivery of conservation assistance to producers who are new to farming, are low-income, identify as one or more marginalized race or ethn...

Equity in Conservation Outreach Cooperative Agreements - Fiscal Year 2023
USDA is investing up to $70 million in cooperative agreements to support outreach to underserved producers and communities about opportunities with NRCS for natural resource conservation, climate-smart agriculture and forestr...

Outreach and Partnerships
Outreach is an integral part of NRCS program and service delivery. Effective outreach helps to ensure that information services and programs reaches all existing and potential customers in a timely and fair manner. 

##   Related Pages

### Historically Underserved Farmers and Ranchers

The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill) includes provisions that address the unique circumstances and concerns of socially disadvantaged, beginning, limited resource, and veteran farmers and ranchers (“historically underserved producers”).
Learn More

### Equity

One of our top priorities, equity is the consistent and systematic treatment of all people in a fair, just, and impartial manner, including members of communities that have been denied such treatment. Federal agencies have been directed to ensure equity in services, planning, and decision making.
Learn More

### Civil Rights 

Across USDA, civil rights ensures equal employment opportunities and program access for all employees and customers. It ensures that every employee, applicant, and program participant is treated with dignity, equality, and respect.
Learn More
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 333-36097 and No. 333-109771 on Form S-8of our report dated April 2, 2007, relating to the financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Channell Commercial Corporation andsubsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),*Share-Based Payment,*effective January 1,2006), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Channell CommercialCorporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 
| */s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP* |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|

 

San Diego, California

March 26, 2008

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Know Your Rights: Limited English Proficiency (LEP)? (NUREG/BR-0344)

Revision 1 to be published in the near future.

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0344 (PDF - 318.84 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published: **
 

Outreach and Compliance Coordination ProgramOffice of Small Business and Civil RightsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

Limited English Proficiency
 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, August 02, 2023
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Performing Uncertainty Analysis of IIST Facility SBLOCA by TRACE and DAKOTA (NUREG/IA-0428)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-04281 (PDF - 2.35 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2013**Date Published:** September 2013

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Chiung-Wen Tsai*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, TAIWAN

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Nowadays, the increasing computing speed realizes the quantification of propagation of input uncertainties to output data with Monte Carlo simulation or modified simulation methods. The best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) methods have been proposed to be used instead of typical conservative methodologies. Based on the CAMP activity, this project demonstrates the capability of SNAP-TRACE-DAKOTA for 2 % small break LOCA (SBLOCA) of IIST experiment. The number of samples was determined by Wilks’ formula to generate the upper bound of peak cladding temperature (PCT) with 95/95 confidence level and probability. The PCTs by IIST experiment and best-estimate calculation are 804 K and 861 K respectively. The mean value and standard deviation of the 59 trial by SNAP-TRACE-DAKOTA are 938.7 K and 63.6 K respectively, and the maximum value of PCT is 1054 K.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                           7,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,468)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,326
<PP&E>                                           6,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,072)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,950
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,425
<SALES>                                         31,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,992
<CGS>                                           29,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    386
<INCOME-TAX>                                       147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       239
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE UNAUDITED 
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          23,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      768
<ALLOWANCES>                                        59
<INVENTORY>                                        701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,514
<PP&E>                                           1,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                     638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,226
<SALES>                                          2,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,996
<CGS>                                            1,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [EPA-R10-OW-2014-0505; FRL-9922-23-Region-10]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of status update.

# SUMMARY:

                        On July 21, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         a Notice of Proposed Determination, under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act, to restrict the use of certain waters in the South Fork Koktuli River, North Fork Koktuli River, and Upper Talarik Creek watersheds in Southwest Alaska as disposal sites for dredged or fill material associated with mining the Pebble deposit, a copper-, gold-, and molybdenum-bearing ore body. On September 19, 2014, EPA published in the                         **Federal Register**                         a notice extending the time period to either withdraw the Proposed Determination or to prepare the Recommended Determination until no later than February 4, 2015. As part of ongoing litigation brought by the Pebble Limited Partnership, on November 25, 2014, a Federal District Court Judge issued a preliminary injunction that requires EPA to stop all work connected to the 404(c) proceeding, including reviewing and considering public comments. EPA is complying with the court's order and as such is not taking any steps to withdraw the Proposed Determination or to prepare a Recommended Determination while the preliminary injunction is in place.                    

Dated: January 21, 2015.

Dennis J. McLerran,

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.

[FR Doc. 2015-01701 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Matthew Rodriquez Secret a ry f or Environmental Protec tion April 6, 2016 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator 

# Air Resources Board Mary D. Nichols, Chairman

1001 I Street • P . O . Box 2815 Sacramento , Ca l ifornia 95812 • www . arb . ca . gov

U.S. Envi ronmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld : Edmund G. Brown Jr. Go v ern or

Enclosed is a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) . This revision consists of the adopted Ozone Emergency Episode Plan (Plan) from the El Dorado County Air Quality Management District (District) . Also enclosed is Air Resources Board (ARB) Executive Order S-16-003 adopting the Plan as a revis i on to the SIP . On October 23, 2014, the U . S. Environmental Protection Agency (U . S. EPA) proposed to partially disapprove portions of the 2014 California Infrastructure SIP including the District requirements relating to an emergency episode plan for ozone (79 FR 63350) . This SIP submittal corrects the deficiency and allows U . S . EPA to move forward to approve this portion of the California Infrastructure SIP. To meet the U . S. EPA' s criteria for determining that rule submittals are administratively and technically complete, we have enclosed an evaluation of the Plan ' s consistency with 40 CFR 51 and other supporting documentation provided to us by the District. One compact disc and one paper copy , each containing the revisions in their entirety , are enclosed. If you have any questions , please have your staff contact Ms . Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Planning and Science Division , at (916) 322-5350 or by email at Karen . Magliano@arb . ca . gov . Sincerely ,

E nclosures

The en ergy challenge facing Cali fornia is real . Ev ery C al

if

ornian needs to t ake immediate action to reduce energy cons ump t ion . F

or a l ist ofs imple ways you can reduce dem and and cut your ener gy costs , see our websit e : http ://www . arb . ca . gov . C a li f orn ia E nv i ronm e nta l Protection Ag e ncy P ri

nt

e d on Rec ycled Pa perMr. Jared Blumenfeld April 6 , 2 016 Page 2 cc : Mr . Dave Johnston Air Pollution Control Officer El Dorado County Air Quality Management D i strict 330 Fair Lane Placerville , California 9566 7-41 00 Mr. Andy Steckel , Chief Rulemaking Office (Air-4) U . S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 95105 Mr . Alan Abbs Executive Director California Air Pollution Control Officers Association 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 1005 Sacramento , California 95814 Ms . Karen Magliano , Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division
CLIFFS MINING SERVICES COMPANY HIBTAC UNIFIED FLOW SHEET - ONE FURNACE
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2012

> 
January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActFOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

# 2013 FOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# C_2004262EN.01001002.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 9 September 2004

in Case C-125/03: Commission of the European Communities against Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Admissibility - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Directive 92/50/EEC - Public contracts - Services for transport of waste - Procedure without prior publication of a contract notice)

(2004/C 262/20)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-125/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: W.-D. Plessing and A. Tiemann) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, K. Lenaerts and K. Schiemann, Judges; L. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by virtue of the fact that contracts for refuse removal concluded by the towns of Lüdinghausen, and Olfen, and the district councils of Nordkirchen, Senden and Ascheberg were awarded in disregard of the advertising rules laid down in Article 8, in conjunction with 15(2) and 16(1) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by virtue of the fact that contracts for refuse removal concluded by the towns of Lüdinghausen, and Olfen, and the district councils of Nordkirchen, Senden and Ascheberg were awarded in disregard of the advertising rules laid down in Article 8, in conjunction with 15(2) and 16(1) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

1

---
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEGGY S. ROACH, a/k/a PEGGY S. 

FITZSTEPHENS, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

May 12, 2016 

v No. 324146 

Van Buren Circuit Court 

DANIEL J. FITZSTEPHENS, LC No. 13-630647-CZ 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and WILDER and BORRELLO, JJ. 

WILDER, J. 

 I concur in result only. 

/s/ Kurtis T. Wilder
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                      29,853,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,701,019
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,405,600)
<INVENTORY>                                 30,550,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            93,067,485
<PP&E>                                       8,511,554
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,487,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,023,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,868,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   103,486,386
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,831,809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,023,576
<SALES>                                    145,297,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           145,297,415
<CGS>                                      103,322,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              103,322,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,917,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,137,458)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,195,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,782,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,413,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,413,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
        

</TABLE>