alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Silvanus Howett *v.*Henry Alexander.

From Perquimons.

An. inf «it is liable for the costs of a suit conducted by his *prochein amij,*and upon a judgment of non suit, a *fi. fa.*may issue against his property.

Trover for a negro, and on tlie trial the Defendant claimed under a sale made by the Sheriff upon a *ji. fa**which issued against the Plaintiff for the cost of a suit wherein he had been nonsuited. The Plaintiff was an infant at the commencement of that suit, and prosecuted it by his *prochein amy.*

The Jury, under the instruction of his honor Judge MartiN, returned a verdict for the Defendant, aud the Plaintiff appealed. /

No Counsel appeared for the Plaintiff.

*Hogg,*for the Defendant.

An infant is liable to pay costs, in every case in which a judgment is rendered against him.''

Th (-English Courts, sometimes oblige a *prochein amy*or guardian, to pay costs by an attachment. But it is not settled, whether an execution may issue against the infant himself. Under our statute of 1777", *(licv. ch.*115,) there can be no doubt on the subject.

in the State of Massachusetts, where there is a similar act, this case has been expressly decided, (ámií/i v. *Floyd* \ Pickering,*275.)

HeNdersoN, Judge.

I know of no distinction between an infant and an adult, as to their liability for costs, nor can I see any reason why one should exist. The officers of the Court are equally entitled in the one case, as in the other. In both they labour at the instance of the party. It is true, that process is not applied for by the *432jnpasrá personally, but it is by one who is appointed by *aw rffiD'e,sent him, and to superintend his interest — his guardian or* next friend. The suit is in his name, ami for jjjg *benefit;*the cost must be paid by some one, and if they are thrown on the guardian or next friend, few ■would undertake to sue in behalf of infants; a due regard to the interest of infants therefore, requires that they should be answerable. A guardian is selected by the Court and gives bond, and the Court should see that no one ‘assumes the character of next friend, but a person of responsibility, and who it is probable bas tbe interest of the infant at heart. If they abuse their office, they are liable to the infant.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13b – 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strayer Education, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Mark C. Brown, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark C. Brown
Mark C. Brown
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2008

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM November 2022

I.7 (+) Populations of 

migratory birds and 

other wetland wildlife

I.8 (+/-) Crop 

depredation by 

waterfowl and 

other wildlife 

D.1 (-) Water 

flow 

downstream

Nutrient management (590)

Pest management (595)

I.11 (+/-) 

Greenhouse 

gases

D.6 (+) Desired 

wetland plant growth

D.7 (+/-) Cost of 

installation, operation, 

and maintenance

I.12 (+) Potential 

income (timber 

harvest, grazing, 

haying)

I.13 (+/-) Net return 

to producer

D.2 (+) Ground 

water recharge

I.3 (+) Transport of 

contaminants to 

ground waters

I.2 (+/-) 

Recreational

opportunities C.2 (+/-) Water quality

Wetland Enhancement (659)

Initial setting: Small freshwater wetlands or 

degraded wetlands where hydrologic or vegetative 

enhancement is needed and can be achieved with 

minimal earth work to favor specific wetland 

functions and targeted species 

3. Native wetland 

vegetation established

4. Natural wetland plant 

regeneration

2. Modify surface 

microtopography 

(excavate, blast, etc.)

I.4 (-) Surface 

water 

released

I.5 (-) 

Contaminants to 

surface waters

C.1 (+/-) Income and

income stability 

(individuals and

community) 

C.3 (+/-) Air quality 

of the air shed

C.4 (+/-) Biodiversity

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

1. Install earthen dikes, 

ditch plugs, or other water 

control structures 5. Nesting islands and 

other wildlife structures

D.3 (+) Greenhouse 

gas emissions

Start

I.9 (-) Populations of 

nontarget species

I.6 (+) Wildlife use

D.4 (+) Habitat 

quality for wildlife

I.10 (+/-) 

Carbon 

storage

I.1 (-) Water 

available for 

other uses

D.5 (-) Habitat 

quality for some 

nontarget wildlife

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Dike (356)

Structure for Water 

Control (587)

Wetland Wildlife 

Habitat Management 

(644)
# C_2004195EN.01000702.xml

| 31.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3090 — VOLKSWAGEN/OFFSET/CRESCENT/LEASEPLAN JV)

(2004/C 195/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3090. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3090. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Philip McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Philip McDermott    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Philip McDermott        |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2004253EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 October 2004

(2004/C 253/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2312 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6889 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0578 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5489 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1925 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,576 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,387 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6641 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4289 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2974 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 971 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,95 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,021 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 842 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6858 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5477 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5939 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8152 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0752 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 410,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0579 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2312

JPY

Japanese yen

135,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4388

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6889

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0578

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5489

ISK

Iceland króna

87,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1925

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,576

CZK

Czech koruna

31,387

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6641

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4289

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2974

ROL

Romanian leu

40 971

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,95

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,021

TRL

Turkish lira

1 842 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6858

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5477

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5939

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8152

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0752

KRW

South Korean won

1 410,83

ZAR

South African rand

8,0579

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI / Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI Surgical), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI Surgical.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 7, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Gerald Woodard
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JOHN A. ROBERTSJohn A. Roberts
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
August 12, 2005 | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Brown *v.*Brown.

From Wilkes.

The persons who are introduced to establish a nuncupative wil:, must have been specially called on by the testator to bear witness to what he was saying1. Where the words uttered were drawn, from the testator by the person interested to establish them as a will, they will not constitute a good nuncupative will.

This wras a petition filed for a distributive share of the estate of James Brown deceased, to which Defendant answered, claiming the property by virtue of a nuncu-pative will.

It appeared from the record of Wilkes County Court, which made part of the case that the Court had directed to be recorded as a nuncupative will, certain affidavits, which were as follow's :

*State of North-Carolina, Wilkes Coimty.*

This day came John N. Green before me, and made oath in due form of law and sayeth, that on Saturday, the day before James Brown died, the said Brown was ill a low state of health, but in his senses, and was asked in his presence by Leannah Chapman what he wanted to be done with his property if he should die j his reply was, for her to do with it, as she pleased.

George Chapman came before me the subscribing Justice for said county, and made oath in due form of law, and sayeth, that he heard James Brown say the same words in answer to what he was asked by Leannah Chapman, for her to do with his property as she pleased, as is stated in the above by Mr. Green. Sworn to &c. 25th August, 1814.

James Brown died on the 14th of August, 1814.

Haix., Judge.

If wc were informed by the records of the County Court of Wilkes that the nuncupative will of James Brown had been proved in Court, and we should *351be furnished with a copy of it properly authenticated, I think we would be bound by it j but in the present instance it seems that the County Court has admitted to record two affidavits which fall far short of establishing a nuncupative will. It is true the record speaks of them as a nuncupative will, but that does not make them one. I think we cannot view them as such, although they have been directed to be recorded, and that the petitioner has a right to recover. It does not appear that James Brown specially required cither of the witnesses to bear witness to what lie was saying $ the words he uttered were drawn from him by the person whose interest it is to establish them as a will. My opinion is that the petitioner should ■ have a decree.

Per Curiam. — Judgment for the petitioner.
<PAGE>

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-31911) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of SRI/Surgical
Express, Inc. (formerly Sterile Recoveries, Inc.) of our report dated February
8, 2002, except for Note M as to which the date is February 21, 2002, with
respect to the financial statements and schedule of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                            /s/ ERNST AND YOUNG LLP



Tampa, Florida
March 26, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements  at  November  30,  1998  and  is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial  statements.  Earnings
per share  information  has been presented to conform with the  requirements  of
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001003934
<NAME>                       Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Sep-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         886,149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,344,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (648,794)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,705,813
<PP&E>                                         30,886,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,573,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,730,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,691,205
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       52,472
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,917,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,730,173
<SALES>                                        15,953,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,953,540
<CGS>                                          8,748,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,748,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,601,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               53,491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,223,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                651,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                   280,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            371,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   371,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.08
<FN>
<F1>  Represents  basic  earnings  per  share  in accordance with SAFAS No. 128,
      Earnings Per Share.
<F2>  Represents  diluted  earnings  per  share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
      Earnings Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2106 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic of Korea, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2017 

Mr. ROSKAM (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. KINZINGER, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. STEWART, 

Mr. VALADAO, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. BEYER, and Mr. HIMES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic 

of Korea, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partner with Korea 

5 Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2106 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECIPROCAL VISAS FOR NATIONALS OF SOUTH 

2 KOREA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘cap7 ital;’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end ‘‘or (iv) solely to per9 form services in a specialty occupation in the United 

10 States if the alien is a national of the Republic of 

11 Korea and with respect to whom the Secretary of 

12 Labor determines and certifies to the Secretary of 

13 Homeland Security and the Secretary of State that 

14 the intending employer has filed with the Secretary 

15 of Labor an attestation under section 212(t)(1);’’. 

16 (b) NUMERICAL LIMITATION.—Section 214(g) of 

17 such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended by adding at the 

18 end the following: 

19 ‘‘(12)(A) The Secretary of State may not approve a 

20 number of initial applications submitted for aliens de21 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(E)(iv) that is more than the 

22 applicable numerical limitations set out in this paragraph. 

23 ‘‘(B) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

24 in subparagraph (A) is 15,000 for each fiscal year. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2106 IH

1 ‘‘(C) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

2 in subparagraph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens 

3 and not the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

4 (c) SPECIALTY OCCUPATION DEFINED.—Section 

5 214(i)(1) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii),’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘clauses (iii) and (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E),’’. 

8 (d) ATTESTATION.—Section 212(t) of such Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1182(t)), as added by section 402(b)(2) of the 

10 United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementa11 tion Act (Public Law 108–77; 117 Stat. 941), is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘or section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ 

14 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘or clause (iii) 

15 or (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E)’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraphs (3)(C)(i)(II), (3)(C)(ii)(II), 

17 and (3)(C)(iii)(II), by striking ‘‘or 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS