alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                                       11
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2001-2
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-3


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicers
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.

/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR




                                      12
GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG

Location: RHFSF Station Name: Location Type:

Location Description:

RHMW04

Establishing Company: TEC Inc.

Drilling Foreman: Tomas Fernandez Drilling Company: Valley Well Drilling

Geologist: N. Griffin/S. MacMillan Ground Surface Elevation (ft): Datum: MSL

Drilling Sampling Method: Borehole Diameter (in): 8

Total Depth (ft): Date Drilling Started: 22 July 2005 Date Drilling Ended: 26 July 2005

Monitoring Well

Remarks: 

Rock Coring

west. access rd., S of Navy Firing Range

313.03

320.5

Page 1 of 2
GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG

Location: RHFSF Station Name: Location Type:

Location Description:

RHMW04

Establishing Company: TEC Inc.

Drilling Foreman: Tomas Fernandez Drilling Company: Valley Well Drilling

Geologist: N. Griffin/S. MacMillan Ground Surface Elevation (ft): Datum: MSL

Drilling Sampling Method: Borehole Diameter (in): 8

Total Depth (ft): Date Drilling Started: 22 July 2005 Date Drilling Ended: 26 July 2005

Monitoring Well

Remarks: 

Rock Coring

west. access rd., S of Navy Firing Range

313.03

320.5

Page 2 of 2
#### In re David P. KENT, Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 84-00038.

United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia.

June 11, 1984.

Barry R. Lenk, Washington, D.C., for debtor.

Paul D. Pearlstein, Washington, D.C., Trustee.

ORDER

GEORGE FRANCIS BASON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon consideration of the trustee’s motion to dismiss or transfer, the trustee’s opposition to the debtor’s claimed exemptions, the debtor’s stipulation consenting to dismissal without prejudice and the trustee’s opposition to the debtor’s stipulation, in which the trustee requests that any dismissal be with prejudice, it is, on June 11, 1984,

ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice.

It may be, as the trustee contends, that the Bankruptcy Code and Virginia’s opt-out statute restrict the debtor, a Virginia resident, to those exemptions that are allowable under Virginia state law. If so, under Virginia law the debtor would be required to file a homestead deed *before*his bank*468ruptcy petition is filed. *In re Collins,*24 B.R. 485 (Bkcy.E.D.Va.1982). Therefore, a transfer of this case to Virginia might well deprive’ the debtor of his right to *any*exemptions, assuming that he has not yet filed a homestead deed. Surely this would be an inequitable penalty merely for having chosen the wrong venue. The debtor by his stipulation has consented to the trustee’s motion to dismiss. That motion, as distinguished from the trustee’s opposition, did not ask for dismissal with prejudice.

In view of this disposition of this case, it is unnecessary for the court to make any decision now concerning whether, notwithstanding contrary decisions such as *In re Sullivan,*680 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir.1982), *cert. den.,*459 U.S. 992, 103 S.Ct. 349, 74 L.Ed.2d 388, the opt-out provision of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(1), violates the Constitutional requirement for “uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies” (Art. I, § 8, cl. 4), or the equal protection or due process clauses of the Constitution, or constitutes unconstitutional delegation of Congressional authority, or is otherwise contrary to the Constitution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 24, 2014 pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), OpenDaylight Project, Inc. (“OpenDaylight”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Intracom S.A. Telecom Solutions, Athens, Greece; Compass Electro Optical System, Netanya, Israel; and Megaport, Queensland, Australia, have been added as parties to this venture.                

                    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenDaylight intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                          ( print page 6769)    

                    On May 23, 2013, OpenDaylight filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 1, 2013 (78 FR 39326).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 1, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 4, 2014 (79 FR 65425).                  

Patricia A. Brink,   

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-02474 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### Wisconsin Trust Company and another, Executors, etc., Respondents, vs. Cousins, Commissioner of Banking, imp., Appellant.

*March 13*

November *16, 1920.*

*Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Cousins, ante,*p. 486, and *Sharpe v. Cousins, ante,*p. 509, followed.

Appeal from a part of a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county. Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed and modified.*

Included in the judgment in the court below was $1,400 damages, together with interest, arising out of an improvident investment made by the Trust Company of $4,000 on November 1, 1907, in one of the Clark Realty Company loans.

A claim was filed in the liquidation proceedings but no mention made therein of this particular item, and the claim *512was disallowed and notice thereof given. Summons was served in March, 1915, and similar proceedings taken as in the preceding cases, and a verified complaint containing this particular item was served' February 4, 1919!

For the appellant there was a brief by *Flanders, Faivsetf & Smart,*and oral argument by *Charles E. Monroe,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Lines, Spooner & Quarles*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *George Lines.*

The following opinion was filed July 17, 1920:

Esci-iweiler, J.

The same situation is presented on this appeal as in the preceding case of Julia C. Sharpe against the same defendant, and the ruling there and in the preceding case of *Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Cousins, ante,*p. 486, 179 N. W. 801, must control.

There having been no claim for this particular item filed with the commissioner of banking, it could not be properly interposed in the complaint in this action. For that reason the portion of the judgment appealed from must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— So much of the judgment as is appealed from is reversed, and the action remanded with directions to modify the judgment in accordance herewith.

Siebecker, C. J., and Rosenberry, J., dissent.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on November 16, 1920.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2020

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 8, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 8, 2023
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-91316, 333-102962, 333-122555 , 333-123408 and 333-129033 ) of  Kinder Morgan Management, LLC of our report dated March 13, 2006relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K, and of our report dated March 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., which appears in Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.







PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

March 13, 2006
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Dust Management for Pen Surfaces (Code 375) 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Dust

Management for Pen Surfaces (Code 375) is for reducing

or preventing the emissions of particulate matter (i.e., dust)

arising from animal activity on pen surfaces at animal

feeding operations. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of this practice is to improve air quality by

reducing the dust emissions caused by animal activity on

pen surfaces. The primary air quality resource concern addressed by this practice is “Emissions of

Particulate Matter (PM) and PM Precursors.” 

This practice applies to any pen surface (e.g., open-lot area, holding pen, corral, working alley, or

other similar area where animals are confined) that may be subject to animal activity at animal feeding

operations (AFOs). It is particularly important for AFOs in drier climates located close to major

roadways and populated areas. 

Prior to installation of this practice, incorporate a dust prevention and control strategy for mitigating

dust emissions from animal activity on pen surfaces into the site conservation plan. 

This practice requires maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS CPS Dust Management for Pen Surfaces (Code 375) is commonly applied with other

conservation practices such as NRCS CPSs Sprinkler System (Code 442), Critical Area Planting

(Code 342), Heavy Use Area Protection (Code 561), Mulching (Code 484), Dust Control on Unpaved

Roads and Surfaces (Code 373), and Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment (Code 380). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Solelyfor the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, that:**

 

•                                          theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                                          theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 13, 2002         |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/                                    | Jacob Inbar |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                           |
|                                   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Dike and Levee (Code 356) 

A dike or levee is a barrier that is constructed of earth or

manufactured material to protect land against flooding or to

regulate water. 

Practice Information 

Dikes and levees are used where control of the water level

is desired. They are used to prevent or reduce flood

damage to human life and property; for flow control in

conjunction with floodways; to impound or regulate water

for fish and wildlife management; to manage water for production of seasonally flooded crops such as

rice or cranberries; or for wetland maintenance, improvement, restoration, or construction. 

The design criteria for a dike or levee depends on its hazard class. The hazard class is based on the

value of the property or crop to be protected and the threat to loss of life. The allowable dike height,

design storm, construction material, freeboard, top width, and side slopes are different for each of the

three hazard classes. 

When planning a dike or leve, it is important to consider the potential effects on the groundwater and

surface water patterns. It is also important to consider the potential effects on the adjacent properties

because of the possibility of inducing damages off-site. Other factors to evaluate include exposure to

open water and buried utilities; compatibility of the site with outlet structures; and cultural resources.

Wetlands, natural areas, and fish and wildlife habitat may also be affected. 

This practice will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice. Maintenance

requirements include regular inspections, removal of burrowing animals, repair and revegetation of

eroded areas, and grading the dike to maintain the planned elevation. 

Common Associated Practices 

Dike and Levee (356) is commonly applied with practices such as Structure for Water Control (587),

Irrigation Water Management (449), Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644), and Wetland

Creation (658). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                        September 30,
                                                  -------------------------
                                                     1999           1998
                                                  ----------     ----------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>
Basic earnings per common share
  Net income for calculating basic earnings
     per common share.........................    $1,180,000     $2,451,000
                                                  ==========     ==========
  Average common shares outstanding...........     5,129,000      5,884,000
                                                  ----------     ----------
  Basic earnings per common share.............    $     0.23     $     0.42
                                                  ==========     ==========
Diluted earnings per common share
  Net income for calculating basic earnings
     per common share.........................    $1,180,000     $2,451,000
                                                  ==========     ==========
  Average common shares outstanding...........     5,129,000      5,884,000
  Add exercise of options and warrants                    --             --
                                                  ----------     ----------
  Diluted common shares outstanding...........     5,129,000      5,884,000
                                                  ==========     ==========
  Diluted earnings per common share...........    $     0.23     $     0.42
                                                  ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,881,204                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 9,990,447                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  846,253                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,589,945                       0
<PP&E>                                       3,602,272                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,544,922                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,745,521                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,017,455                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,542,000                       0
<COMMON>                                       289,437                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,849,338                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,745,521                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,593                 134,488
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,884,606              12,390,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,952                   9,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,312,179)            (12,719,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,312,179)            (12,719,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,312,179)            (12,719,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)                  (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)                  (0.50)


</TABLE>
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Mark E. Schwarz                                                           |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  | Mark E. Schwarz                                                               |
|                 | Title: | Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer) |