alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott
K. Sorensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Kirk A. Benson
-------------------------
Kirk A. Benson
Chief Executive Officer
February 3, 2006

/s/ Scott K. Sorensen
-------------------------
Scott K. Sorensen
Chief Financial Officer
February 3, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 28, 2000,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended July 28, 2000 and July 30, 1999, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the nine-month
period ended July 28, 2000, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the nine-month periods ended July 28, 2000 and July 30, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Autologic
Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 29, 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated
December 10, 1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 29, 1999, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.



August 28, 2000
Woodland Hills, California



                                       15
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject – FY 2015

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
WILL WILSON January 13, 1961

Mr. Raymond W. Vowel1 ExecutiveDirector Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools Box S, Capitol Station Austin, Texas OpinionNo. W-981

Re: Validity of proposed contract between the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools and the county,whereby the county agrees to care for mentally ill committed to a Texas State Hospital under the controland management of the Board for Texas State Hospitals Dear Mr. Vowell: and Special Schools.

You have requested our opinion on the validity of a proposed contractbetween the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools and the County of El Paso, whereby the County of El Paso, El Paso County Hospital, acting by and through the agrees to care and treat persons ad'udged to be mentally ill, speclficallyagreeing to:

rr 1 provideand maintain in-patienthospital facilities, 2 provide diets and basic nursing care, I I 3 furnishand maintain facilities for out-patients,and 4 provide and make availablepsychiatric consulting servicesof an average of ten visitsperweek.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 3174b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools has control and managementof the Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools createdby the Legislature and such "out-patientclinics"as are established by the Board pursuant to the provisionsof Article 317413-4, Vernon's Civil Statutes.

The El Paso County Hospital is not a Texas State Hospital or Special School createdby the LegislatureandMr.Raymond W. Vowell, page 2 (Ww-981)

the proposed contractdoes not createan out-patient clinic in compliancewith the provisionsof Article 3174b-4,Vernon's Civil Statutes. We fail to find any provisionauthorizing the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools to contractwith the county for the care and treatment of mentally ill committedto a Texas State Hospital under the management and control of the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools. It is our opinion that the proposed contract attached to your request is invalid.
SUIYMARY
The Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools does not have a,uthority to enter into the proposed contractwhereby the county agrees to care for the tnentally ill committedto a Texas State Hospital under the controland management of the Board for Texas StateHospitals and Special Schools.
Yours very truly,
WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

JR:ms/hmc
APPROVED:
OPINION COMUTTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman
GlennR. Brown Cecil Cammack Dean Davis Gordon Cass Fred Werkenthin

REVIEWED FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: MorganNesbitt
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9  
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      12,554,285
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,765
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            12,275,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,471,445
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      36,218,073
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        36,674,391
<LOANS>                                    185,746,103
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,201,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             277,958,820
<DEPOSITS>                                 248,821,819
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,007,178
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,566,266
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       437,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,126,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             277,958,820
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,019,190
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,105,284
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               433,300
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,557,774
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,812,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,876,156
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,681,618
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              10,664
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,776,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,924,458
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,924,458
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,205,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    272,949
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,929,719
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   39,514
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,769
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,201,974
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,201,974
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Annual Report of Symons International Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date herof (the 'Report"), I , Douglas
H.  Symons,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sction 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
15(d)  of  the  Securieties  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company  as  of  and  for  the  periods  stated  therein.


Dated:  June  3,  2003                         By:  /s/  Douglas  H.  Symons
        --------------                              ------------------------
                                                         Douglas  H.  Symons
                                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
# C_2004273EN.01000602.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 September 2004

in Case C-404/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales (Chancery Division): Nichols plc v Registrar of Trade Marks (1)

1

(Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 3(1)(b) - Trade mark comprising a common surname - Distinctive character - Impact of Article 6(1)(a) on assessment)

(2004/C 273/11)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-404/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, (United Kingdom), made by decision of 3 September 2002, registered at the Court on 12 November 2002, in the proceedings between Nichols plc and Registrar of Trade Marks — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

In the context of Article 3(1)(b) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, the assessment of the existence or otherwise of the distinctive character of a trade mark constituted by a surname, even a common one, must be carried out specifically, in accordance with the criteria applicable to any sign covered by Article 2 of that directive, in relation, first, to the products or services in respect of which registration is applied for and, second, to the perception of the relevant consumers. The fact that the effects of registration of the trade mark are limited by virtue of Article 6(1)(a) of that directive has no impact on that assessment.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.

1

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM March 2014

Shallow Water Development 

and Management (646)

1. Inundation of lands to provide habitat and refuge 

for fish and/or wildlife species that require shallow 

water for at least a part of their life cycle

I.3 (+) Use 

of habitat 

by nontarget 

species 

D.4 (-) Land available for 

commercial agricultural 

production or development

C1. (+) Health and population 

of fish and wildlife 

C.2 (+) Biodiversity 

I.2 (+) Use of 

habitat by 

target species

C.6 (+/-) Income and income 

stability (individuals and

community) 

Initial setting: Where habitat is 

needed for wildlife that require 

shallow water: (1) on lands

where water can be impounded 

or regulated by diking excavating, 

ditching, and/or flooding; (2) on 

flood plains area that provide 

refuge habitats for native fish 

during high flow periods

D.1 (+) Habitat for 

target species

I.4 (-) Habitat for 

noxious/invasive 

species (with 

vegetation 

management)

C.3 (+) Recreational 

opportunities

I.8 (+/-) Nutrients

I.6 (+) 

Sedimentation 

(onsite) I.5 (+/-) Water 

temperature

C.4 (+/-) Water 

quality

I.9 (+/-) Water-borne 

contaminants to 

receiving waters*

D.3 (+) 

Anaerobic 

conditions 

(during 

inundation)

D.5 (+) Cost 

of installation 

and 

maintenance

D.2 (+) Ponded 

water (seasonal)

I.7 (-) Sedimentborne contaminants 

to receiving waters

I.10 (+) Temporary 

flood storage

C.5 (+/-) Community 

health and safety

I.17 (-) Net return to producer

I.1 (-) 

Habitat 

fragmentation 

I.11 (+) 

Methane 

production

I.13 (+) Temporary 

carbon storage

I.12 (-) Organic 

matter oxidation 

I.14 (+/-) 

Greenhouse gases

I.15 

(+/-) Air 

quality

I.16 (-) 

Potential 

income

Start

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or 

adverse.

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Structure for Water 

Control (587)

Dike (356)

Early Successional Habitat 

Development and Management (647)

Critical Area Planting 

(342)

Filter Strip (393)

Prescribed Burning (338)
SERVED OCTOBER 16, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARlNGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

APPLICATION OF 

TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD 

FDMS DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-1117 

(Equal Access to Justice Action) 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICANT'S APPEAL 

I 

OCT 2 2 2015 

!NG 

COMES NOW Applicant, TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD., by and through its 

counsel, BARNETT & BORTI-1, LLC, and pursuant to the settlement agreement reached by the 

parties hereby withdraws its appeal. 

Charles R. Barnett, Ill 

Barnett & Borth, LLC 

800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 

Glenview, IL 60025 

(815) 356-7042 (FAX) 

Respectfully submitted, 

Attorney for Applicant 

Trans North Aviation, LTD. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Notice Withdrawal of Applicant's Appeal 

was served via US Certified Mail, return receipt requested as follows: 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WJ 000 

FAX: 202-493-5142 

ONE COPY 

Jessica E. Kabaz-Gomez, Agency's Counsel 

Enforcement Division AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7395 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

James W. Tegtmeier 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Manager, Midwest Team Enforcement Division 

FAA Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7058 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

Dated this 16th day October 2015 

tC~ Charles R. Barnett, TIT 

Attorney for Respondent 

2
# C_2004262EN.01003001.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/30

---

Action brought on 30 June 2004 by World Wide Fund for Nature European Policy Programme against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-264/04)

(2004/C 262/58)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 June 2004 by World Wide Fund for Nature European Policy Programme, Brussels, Belguim, represented by Ms R. Haynes, Barrister.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Council, of 30 April 2004, maintaining the Council's refusal to disclose the document it had identified as relevant to the applicant's request. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Council, of 30 April 2004, maintaining the Council's refusal to disclose the document it had identified as relevant to the applicant's request.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

By a letter dated 23 February 2004 the applicant applied to the Council in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation 1049/2001 (1), Official Journal L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43-48, and sought information with respect to an item entitled ‘WTO-Sustainability and Trade after Cancun’ on the agenda of the ‘Article 133 EC’ Committee for a meeting of its Deputy Members on 19 December 2003. By letter of 17 March 2004 the Council indicated that, in relation to the applicant's application, it had identified a note of the Commission covering a wide range of issues concerning the follow-up to the Cancun conference which, however, it declined to disclose on the basis that disclosure would undermine the European Union's commercial interests and would be prejudicial to economic relationships with third countries. It further informed the applicant that no minutes of meetings of the Deputy Members of the Committee were drawn up.

1

The applicant made a confirmatory application in accordance with Article 7 paragraph 2 of Regulation 1049/2001 on 5 April 2004. By the contested decision the Council maintained its refusal on the grounds it had already indicated.

In support of its application to annul the contested decision the applicant contends that the Council has erred in its assessment of the sensitivity of the relevant information, has failed to provide adequate reasons for its refusal and has failed to apply properly the principle of proportionality in assessing the possibility of partial disclosure.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.

1

---
No. 82-6037.

#### Hayward *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 91-680.

No. 91-681.

No. 91-6255.

#### Fairway Spring Co., Inc., et al. *v.*Sovran Bank/Maryland. Chemung Canal Trust Co., as Trustee of the Fairway Spring Co., Inc., Restated Pension Plan *v.*Sovran Bank/Maryland. Siggers et al. *v.*Tunica County Board of Supervisors et al.

C. A. 2d Cir.;

C. A. 2d Cir.; and

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Miss. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0010 SAT Date: 10/12/2012

Print Date: 3/8/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: Dropped at CRSS
Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0010 FATE: Estimations for typical 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol diether MW 270 C16H30O3 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 3.9 (E) S = 34 mg/L at 25 C (E)VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C ( N OMO5) BP = 411 C ( N OMO5) based on 262C @ 10 mm Hg (M) BP = Dec. 444 C (M) H = 1.18E-8 (E) log Koc = 1.95 (E) log Fish BCF = 2.24 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.26 (E) POTW removal (%) = 25-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is moderate all routes, based on analogs. Some portion of the PMN substance will undergo ester hydrolysis. There is concern for irritation to all exposed tissues, based on analogs.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.8 daphnid 48-h LC50 6.6 green algal 96-h EC50 2.1 fish

_ chronic value 0.20 daphnid

_ chronic value 2.7
algal

_ chronic value 0.95
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for esters; SAR chemical class = ester; MW 317; log Kow = 3.72 (EPI, ester component) liquid with mp unknown (M); S = 48.7 mg/L at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 20

SARs esters SAR Class esterEcotox Category Esters
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
ANDREW JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4288

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 8, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Regional Counsel, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Conflict 

Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, because the trial 

court was without jurisdiction to consider or rule upon Appellant’s motion to 
2

withdraw plea filed after the notice of appeal, we reverse the order denying the 

motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion. See Adkinson v. 

State, 36 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Hines v. State, 32 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2010). 

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with 

instructions.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.