alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                          NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Six Months            Six Months         Three Months          Three Months
                                              Ended 6/30/01        Ended 6/30/00        Ended 6/30/01         Ended 6/30/00
                                              -------------        -------------        -------------         -------------
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>                  <C>                   <C>
NET EARNINGS/(LOSS)                           $ (1,907,000)        $     699,000        $ (1,091,000)         $     286,000
                                              =============        =============        =============         =============


EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                             5,470,311            5,468,644        $   5,470,311             5,468,644
                                              =============        =============        =============         =============


Earnings/(Loss) per common share
Primary                                       $       (.35)        $         .13        $       (.20)         $         .05
                                              =============        =============        =============         =============

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
-----------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                             5,470,311            5,468,644            5,470,311             5,468,644


Common and Common Stock equivalent
shares using the treasury stock method                    0              190,582                    0               194,891
                                              -------------        -------------        -------------         -------------


Total shares outstanding for purposes of
calculating diluted earnings                      5,470,311            5,659,226        $   5,470,311             5,663,535
                                              =============        =============        =============         =============


Earnings (loss) per common and common
Equivalent share - Diluted                    $       (.35)        $         .12        $       (.20)         $         .05
                                              =============        =============        =============         =============

</TABLE>






                                       16
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 220 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric 

project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

4 UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION AUTHOR5 IZATION. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC

8 PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Terror Lake Hydroelectric 

9 Project’’ means the project identified in section 1325 

10 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 220 IH

1 Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is Federal Energy 

2 Regulatory Commission project number 2743. 

3 (2) UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION EXPAN4 SION.—The term ‘‘Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 

5 Expansion’’ means the expansion of the Terror Lake 

6 Hydroelectric Project as generally described in Ex7 hibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Applica8 tion dated July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alas9 ka Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund 

10 Round VIII by Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 

11 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The licensee for the Terror 

12 Lake Hydroelectric Project may occupy not more than 20 

13 acres of Federal land to construct, operate, and maintain 

14 the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion without fur15 ther authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or 

16 under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

17 Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). 

18 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—The Upper Hidden Basin Di19 version Expansion shall be subject to appropriate terms 

20 and conditions included in an amendment to a license 

21 issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pur22 suant to the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), 

23 including section 4(e) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)), fol24 lowing an environmental review by the Commission under 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 220 IH

1 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

2 4321 et seq.). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  PRIDE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements for the three months ended February 28, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 dec-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-01-1998
<CASH>                                         13,689
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,243,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    179,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         30,879,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,308,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,724,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,912,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,724,367
<SALES>                                        3,580,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,580,971
<CGS>                                          2,552,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,552,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             575,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (194,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (194,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (194,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)

        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BILAL SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 836 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Philip M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.


                                          By: /s/ Philip M. McDermott
                                              -----------------------
                                          Name: Philip M. McDermott
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,185
<SECURITIES>                                    75,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                        68
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,663
<PP&E>                                          18,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        12,014
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                       939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30041

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:07-CR-179-4

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Davis has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davis has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-30041 Document: 00511216999 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/27/2010
# C_2004299EN.01001501.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/15

---

Imposition by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France

(2004/C 299/08)

1.   Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Annecy (Meythet) and Paris (Orly).

2.   The public service obligation is as follows:

Minimum frequency

The service must be operated throughout the year with at least three return trips a day, one in the morning and one in the evening, from Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays and one return trip on Sunday.

The service in the middle of the day may be rerouted for up to 10 weeks a year.

The service must be non-stop between Annecy and Paris (Orly).

Type of aircraft used

The service must be operated with a pressurised aircraft having a seating capacity of at least 40.

Timetables

Timetables must be such as to enable passengers on business trips during the working week to make the round trip within the day and to spend at least eight hours at their destination, whether Annecy or Paris.

Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by at least one computerised booking system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any year. The carrier must give six months' notice before discontinuing the service.

force majeure

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

3.   Slots have been reserved at Paris (Orly) airport for the scheduled Paris (Orly) — Annecy service pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004. Air carriers interested in this route can obtain information about the allocation of these slots from the Paris airports coordinator.

---
# C_2004239EN.01000703.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/7

---

Action brought on 29 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-329/04)

(2004/C 239/13)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 29 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Denis Martin, of its legal service and Horstpeter Kreppel, Judge of the Arbeitsgericht (Labour Court) seconded to the Commission's legal service as part of an exchange programme with national civil servants, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary fully to comply with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), or to notify the Commission of any such provisions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary fully to comply with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), or to notify the Commission of any such provisions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period for transposition of Directive 2000/43/EC expired on 19 July 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22.

1

---
#### Franz, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Roach, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Lockney & Lowry*of Waukesha.

For the respondent: *Jacobson & Malone*of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00146

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF M.W., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 325th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 325

- 683388

- 20 )

Au gust 19, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s order of termination . It is ordered that the

trial court ’ s orde r of termination is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         664,973                 314,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 348,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               667,676                 683,874
<PP&E>                                         431,641                 410,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,847                  26,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,126,765               1,097,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,621,088               1,958,218
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         65                      58
<COMMON>                                         9,409                   9,379
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,007,149)             (1,943,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,126,765               1,097,752
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                 120,550
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  734,725                 239,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,839                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (789,970)               (118,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (789,970)               (118,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (789,970)               (118,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)                  (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





I, Gilbert Hu, certify that:








1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AltiGen Communications, Inc.;
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: February 11, 2005By:
/s/ Gilbert HuGilbert Hu Chief Executive Officer