alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004224EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2004

(2004/C 224/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2079 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1335 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5325 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,63 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3365 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,713 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,86 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6575 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4273 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3828 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 075 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240,01 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,13 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 820 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7453 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5648 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,421 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8687 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0567 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 389,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,026 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2079

JPY

Japanese yen

132,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1335

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5325

ISK

Iceland króna

87,63

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3365

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,713

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,86

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6575

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4273

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3828

ROL

Romanian leu

41 075

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240,01

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,13

TRL

Turkish lira

1 820 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7453

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5648

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,421

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8687

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0567

KRW

South Korean won

1 389,99

ZAR

South African rand

8,026

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004273EN.01002102.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 16 June 2004 in the case of Diagnostikon kai Therapeftikon Kentron Athinon – Igia A.E. against Ipourgos Ikonomikon

(Case C-394/04)

(2004/C 273/37)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 16 June 2004 received at the Court Registry on 17 September 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Diagnostikon kai Therapeftikon Kentron Athinon – Igia A.E. against Ipourgos Ikonomikon on the following question:

Do services supplied by persons referred to in Article 13A(1)(b) of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) comprising the grant of use of a telephone and a television to patients and the provision of food and a bed to persons accompanying patients come under activities closely related to hospital and medical care, within the meaning of that provision, as activities ancillary to that care but also essential to it?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 145 of 13.6.1977.

1

---
M e m o t o D o c k e t

S u b j e c t: M e e t i n g B e t w ee n F r e e p or t M c M o R a n Mi a m i I n c or p

. ( F M M I ) a n d E P A

Da t e : A pr i l 29

, 2014

P a r t i c i p a n t s :

N a me : O r g a n i za t i on :

B e n L i p p a r d V & E / F M M I

C hr i s W e s t F M M I

J e f f H a r r i n g ton A M E C

E ll i o t t L a w s C r ow e l l & M o r i n g

J e r r y R o o s e F M C

E d d i e A l

- R a y e s T r i n i t y C o n s u l t a n t s

E u g e n e C h e n E P A A i r P e r m i t s

G e o f f r e y G l a ss E P A A i r P e r m i t s

T h o m a s W e b b E P A R 9

D e bor a h J ord a n E P A R 9

N i n a S p i e g e l m a n E P A R 9

C h a r l o t t e W i th e y E P A R9

J a y S p e h a r F M I

T od d W ea v e r F r ee p or t

- M c M o R a n

A g e n d a:

I

. I n t r od u c t io n

II

. T ec h ni ca l I s s u e s w i t h t h e P r o po s e d F I P f or S O 2

A

. S ec o n d a r y H o o d ing

B

. T r e a t m e n t o f S O2 e m i s s ion s f r o m th e c o nv e r t e r a i s l e

C

. E s t i m a t io n o f b a s e li n e S O2 e m i s s ion s f r o m th e c o nv e r t e r a i s l e

D

. C o s t D a t a

E

. C a l c u l a t io n o f C o n t r o l E f f i c i e n c y

III

. F M M I ’ s B A R T A n a l y s i s

I V

. Sm e l t e r U p g r a d e P ro j e c t a s a B e t t e r

- t h a n

- B A R T A l t e rn a t i v e

V

. N O x I s s u e

S u m m a r y: P l e a s e s e e “ F M M I P r e s e n t a t io n t o E P A o n H a z e F I P

. ”
# C_2004228EN.01001001.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-459/02 (reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour de Cassation (Luxembourg)): Willy Gerekens and Association agricole pour la promotion de la commercialisation laitière Procola v State of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Milk - Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector - National legislation - Levy fixed retroactively - General principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity)

(2004/C 228/18)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-459/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour de Cassation (Luxembourg) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Willy Gerekens and Association agricole pour la promotion de la commercialisation laitière Procola against the State of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on the interpretation of the general principles of Community law of legal certainty and non-retroactivity in respect of national rules in the sphere of milk production quotas which were adopted in place of initial rules held by the Court of Justice to be discriminatory and which make it possible to penalise retroactively production in excess of those quotas after the entry into force of Council Regulation (EEC) No 856/84 of 31 March 1984 amending Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 10) and Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), but in accordance with the national rules which have been replaced,— the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, acting for the President of the Third Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The general principles of Community law of legal certainty and non-retroactivity do not mean that, for the application of Community rules establishing production quotas of the type introduced by Council Regulation (EEC) No 856/84 of 31 March 1984 amending Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products and Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector, a Member State is precluded from adopting, in place of initial rules held by the Court of Justice to be discriminatory, new rules applying retroactively to production in excess of the production quotas introduced following the entry into force of those regulations, but in accordance with the national rules which have been replaced.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>                        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                                FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART
                                OF 360 COMMUNICATIONS' FIRST QUARTER 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0001003959
<NAME>                          360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        8,670
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                95,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                  5,319
<INVENTORY>                                  39,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            225,752
<PP&E>                                    1,519,435
<DEPRECIATION>                              452,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,809,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       238,485
<BONDS>                                   1,799,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      1,233
<OTHER-SE>                                  471,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,809,739
<SALES>                                      12,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            306,846
<CGS>                                        28,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                41,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             60,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              6,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           31,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              17,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                  8,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           9,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  9,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015319EN.01002101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 319/21 |

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/812 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 amending Council Regulations (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2187/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 2347/2002 and (EC) No 1224/2009, and Regulations (EU) No 1379/2013 and (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the landing obligation, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1434/98

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 133 of 29 May 2015](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2015_133_R_TOC)
)

On page 15, point (1) of Article 7:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | in Article 1, ...’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | in the title, Article 1, ...’. |

---
Who We Are

USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service helps farmers care for the natural 

resources on their land – soil, water, air, plant and animals. 

How We Help Urban Farmers

NRCS provides technical and financial assistance to growers in:

• Soil Health - As experts in soil health, NRCS conservationists can advise 

urban growers on things like what cover crops to grow, using farmers’ soil tests 

and our soil surveys.

• Irrigation and Water Conservation - We can help urban growers 

conserve water, by assisting with things like drip irrigation.

• Weeds and Pests - We can help with pest and weed management by planting 

buffers for beneficial insects, through mulching, using cover crops and various 

other means.

• High Tunnels – NRCS can provide financial assistance for high tunnels, used 

to extend the growing season and to protect plants from harsh weather, air 

pollution and pests. By making local produce available for more months in the 

year, fewer resources are used to transport food to plates.

NRCS and Urban 

Agriculture
Why Urban Farming?

Urban agriculture pioneers are taking action in their communities, 

growing not only fresh, healthy produce, but increasing opportunity 

and knowledge and improving the beauty of their neighborhoods. 

Through community gardens, produce is being grown and donated to 

those who need it and children and adults are learning about agriculture first-hand. Farmer’s markets are offering easy-access to fresh 

foods in areas where grocery stores are miles away and are providing 

new income streams for residents.

NRCS serves all agriculture – large to small, conventional to organic, rural to urban. As American agriculture continues to grow in new 

directions, NRCS conservation assistance is growing along with it. By 

bringing cultivation and opportunity to both rural and urban areas, we 

address many needs -- Restoring the health of the soil. Restoring the 

health of people. 

Get Started

Starting an urban farm comes with a unique set of challenges and 

opportunities. NRCS can help with the challenges of conservation, 

and support urban farmers in their efforts to achieve local, healthy, 

sustainable food for their communities. Start by contacting your local 

NRCS Service Center, at https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator. 

NRCS. Helping People Help the Land... Even in the City. 

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

NRCS and Urban Agriculture
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31


                    SECOND ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                              OF FRED S. WEINGARD

This agreement ("Addendum #2") amends the Letter Employment Agreement (the
"Letter Agreement") dated June 21, 1996 as amended (by the Addendum executed 21
June 1996, "Addendum #1") between Universal Trading Technologies Corporation
(UTTC(TM)), Ashton Technology Group Inc. (Ashton), and Fred S. Weingard
(Employee).  The parties agree as follows:

1.   The term of employment shall be extended an additional three (3) years and
     this new term of employment shall apply to all pertinent provisions (e.g.,
     relating to term and termination) of the Letter Agreement, as amended by
     Addendum #1. Hence, Section 4.0 shall read: "The term of your employment is
     six (6) years beginning on July 8, 1996 and ending on July 7, 2002, unless
     terminated earlier, as provided in paragraph 11.0 below (the "Term").

2.   Section 6.3 (relating to bonuses) shall be deleted; however, a final semi-
     annual minimum bonus of $40,000 is due and owing to Employee on July 5,
     1999. Section 6.1 shall read: "Your base salary during the Term is
     guaranteed to be no less than $265,000 per year effective 1 July 1999.
     Payment of salary shall be twice per month."

3.   Add as 9.3 the following: "Ashton shall make a good faith effort to file an
     S-8 registration statement during August 1999 which will include shares of
     common stock underlying 150,000 of the 538,750 option shares granted to
     Fred Weingard on July 15, 1998. Ashton shall also seek means to permit
     cashless exercise of the options by a qualified brokerage. You will also
     receive, by 15 July 1999, a five year stock option (fully vested) for
     100,000 shares of registered and unrestricted Ashton common stock priced at
     the public price on the close of June 24, 1999. These actions are solely in
     consideration for this contract extension (Addendum #2) and for superior
     performance under your Letter Agreement, as amended by Addendum #1."

4.   All provisions of the Letter Agreement, as amended by Addendum #1, which
     are not expressly amended or modified by this Addendum or which are not
     effected by Section 1.0 of this Addendum, shall remain unchanged.

Executed this 24th day of June, 1999.


By: /s/ Fred S. Weingard
    ------------------------------
        Fred S. Weingard, Employee

Universal Trading Technologies Corporation


By: /s/ Fredric W. Rittereiser
    -------------------------------
        Fredric W. Rittereiser, CEO

Ashton Technology Group


By: /s/ Fredric W. Rittereiser
    -------------------------------
        Fredric W. Rittereiser, CEO


By: /s/ Arthur J. Bacci
    ------------------------------
        Arthur J. Bacci, President


By: /s/ K. Ivan F. Gothner
    --------------------------------------------
    Ashton Compensation Committee Representative
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4309

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARD THOMPSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-15) Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: October 28, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert W. Louthian, LOUTHIAN & LOUTHIAN, Columbia, South Carolina,for Appellant. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bernard Thompson pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) (1994) and was sentenced to ninety-seven months imprisonment. On appeal, Thompson contends that during sentencing the court improperly denied him a downward departure for his cooperation with the Government because the information he provided was not useful. Thompson's attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Thompson was notified of his right to file an additional brief, but has not done so. We affirm.Thompson's claim has no factual basis. Our review of the transcripts of the sentencing hearing discloses that the court granted the Government's oral motion to allow Thompson a two-level downwarddeparture in his sentence for his cooperation and sentenced Thompson accordingly. We therefore find Thompson's claim meritless. In accordance with Anders , we have examined the entire record in this case and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client in writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Philip
      McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
      Communications, Inc.








Date:
                August 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Philip M. McDermottName:
            Philip
                M. McDermottTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.