alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14215 and #14216]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of WASHINGTON dated 01/29/2015. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         01/03/2015 through 01/06/2015.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         01/29/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/30/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/29/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Grays Harbor *Contiguous Counties:* Washington: Jefferson; Lewis; Mason; Pacific; Thurston The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14215 B and for economic injury is 14216 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Washington. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: January 29, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-02361 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERG                              
| |                                                      
| | Katherine Greenberg                                  
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

Date: June 28, 2004

1
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

RI CKY RAMOS, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00090- CR

Appea l from 371st District Court of Tar rant County , Texas (TC # 1161510D)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Ricky Ramos appea ls his conviction of burg lary of a habitation. Appellant waived his rig ht
to a jury trial and e ntere d a neg otiated plea of g uilty

. I n acc ordanc e with the plea barg ain, the trial court plac ed Appe llant on defe rre d adjudication community supervision for five y ear s. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate alleg ing sever al violations of the terms and conditions of community supervision. Ba sed on Appellant’s plea of true to sever al of the alleg ed violations, the trial court g rante d the State’s motion, adjudicate d Appellant g uilty , and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a ter

m of five y ear s. We affirm. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has conclude d that the
appea l is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the req u i re m en t s of Anders v. Calif ornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct

. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493, reh. denied , 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct

. 2094,
18 L .Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by prese nting a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord demonstrating why , in eff ect, there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See High v. State , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Cu r r i e v. Stat e, 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jack son v. Stat e ,485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969).

A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivere d to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised o f h is rig ht to ex amine the a

ppellate r ecor d and file a pro se brief. N o pro se brief ha s been f iled.
We have car efully revie wed the rec ord and counsel’s brief, and ag ree that the appea l is wholly frivolous and without merit. Fur ther, we find nothing in the rec ord that might arg uably support the appe al. The judg ment is affirme d.

Dec ember

15, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. (Do Not Publish)
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEGGY S. ROACH, a/k/a PEGGY S. FITZSTEPHENS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 12, 2016

v No. 324146
Van Buren Circuit Court DANIEL J. FITZSTEPHENS, LC No. 13-630647-CZ

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: M URPHY , P.J., and W ILDER and B ORRELLO , JJ.

W ILDER
, J.

I concur in result only.

/s/ Kurtis T. Wilder
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>



THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ATLANTIC
INTERNATIONAL  ENTERTAINMENT LTD's FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          238,785
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   848,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              1,127,605
<PP&E>                                                        1,532,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  140,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                4,306,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           333,342
<BONDS>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                          9,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    3,963,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  4,306,253
<SALES>                                                         604,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                604,248
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   353,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 304,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    (58,858)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             194,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   51,364
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    245,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0.026
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.026
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004168EN.01001002.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/10

---

Action brought on 16 April 2004 by Bernard Nonat against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-151/04)

(2004/C 168/19)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 2004 by Bernard Nonat, residing in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Nöel Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision establishing the final career development report for the period from 1 July to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision establishing the final career development report for the period from 1 July to 31 December 2002;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case objects to his career development report, as drawn up for the period from 1 July to 31 December 2002.

In support of his claims, the applicant argues:

| — | failure to observe the obligation to state reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

failure to observe the obligation to state reasons;

| — | infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and the transitional measures applicable to the appraisal exercise 2001-2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and the transitional measures applicable to the appraisal exercise 2001-2002;

| — | infringement of Article 5(5)(c) of the General Provisions for Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 5(5)(c) of the General Provisions for Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | manifest error of assessment; |
| --- | --- |

—

manifest error of assessment;

| — | infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination;

| — | lack of consistency between the comments and the mark awarded. |
| --- | --- |

—

lack of consistency between the comments and the mark awarded.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                       CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



         In connection with the Form 10KSB of Prevention Insurance.com for the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2004, I, Scott Goldsmith, President of Prevention
Insurance.com, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss1350 as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge and
believe that:

(1)      Such form 10KSB for the year ended April 30, 2004, fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934: and

(2)      The information contained is such Form 10KSB for the year ended April
         30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of Prevention Insurance.com.

                                                     Prevention Insurance.com


                                                     By:  /s/ Scott Goldsmith
                                                          -------------------
                                                            Scott Goldsmith
                                                            President
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11
 
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                                                       -------------------------   -------------------------
                                                                         Dec. 31,     Dec. 31,      Dec. 31,      Dec. 31,
                                                                           1997         1996          1997          1996
                                                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                                   <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss                                                               $(1,556,253)  $(2,046,936)  $(3,512,057)  $(5,199,487)
Less recognition of beneficial conversion
  feature of preferred stock                                              (926,282)           --      (926,282)     --
                                                                       -----------   ----------    ----------    -----------
  Net loss available to common stockholders                            $(2,482,535)  $ 2,046,936)  $(4,438,339)  $(5,199,487) 
                                                                       ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
Weighted-average shares used in computing net 
  loss per common share                                                  7,562,500     7,562,500     7,562,500     7,562,500
                                                                       ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
 
Net loss per common share                                              $      (.33)  $      (.27)  $      (.59)  $     (.73)
                                                                       ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2004273EN.01002202.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/22

---

Action brought on 21 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-400/04)

(2004/C 273/41)

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Knut Simonsson and Wouter Wils.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by not adopting the legislative and administrative measures necessary in order to implement Directive 2001/96/EC (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 December 2001 establishing harmonised requirements and procedures for the safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers, or at any rate by not informing the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by not adopting the legislative and administrative measures necessary in order to implement Directive 2001/96/EC (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 December 2001 establishing harmonised requirements and procedures for the safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers, or at any rate by not informing the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| 2. | Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas and main arguments:

The period allowed for transposition of Directive 2001/96/EC expired on 5 August 2003.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 13, p. 9.

1

---
**Part 611—ASSISTANCE TO OTHER UNITS OF GOVERNMENT**

***Table of Contents***

**PARTTITLE           PAGE**

611.00  General information 611-1

611.01  Cooperative agreements611-1

**Part 611—ASSISTANCE TO OTHER UNITS OF GOVERNMENT**

***611.00 General information***

Resource soil scientists may provide information, training, and reports to other units of government without the need for a cooperative agreement if the assistance is directly related to information already provided in published soil survey information.

***611.01 Cooperative agreements***

Resource soil scientists may get involved with projects in cooperation with other Federal, State, and local agencies through cooperative agreements (Memorandum of Agreement [MOA]). Agreements should follow guidelines in the Economy Act (http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal25/economy-act.htm). The act allows agreements for procurement of goods and services by one agency through another as long as it is beneficial to the U.S. Government and the agency providing the goods and services is compensated. The role of the resource soil scientist should be to provide products related to soil survey and provide technical expertise in soil science. 

In some cases an MOA between agencies may already be in place for an NRCS soil scientist to provide technical expertise to another agency. An example of this is the Joint Guidance from the NRCS and the COE Concerning Wetland Determinations for the Clean Water Act and the Food Security Act Manual (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/compliance/pdf_files/COE_NRCS_wetland.pdf), which outlines the responsibility of NRCS and the Corps of Engineers (COE) for doing wetland determinations. In this example, NRCS personnel may provide technical expertise to the COE for purposes of wetland delineation, since they have the hydric soils expertise. In return, the COE may provide technical expertise on other wetland issues to NRCS when NRCS lacks the expertise.

In some cases there are more general agreements between NRCS and cooperating agencies. For example, agreements between NRCS and State agricultural agencies and districts are in place for reciprocal assistance in implementation of both Federal and State farm programs.

Also, in some cases a specific agreement may have to be created for special projects that may be done in cooperation with other agencies. An example is an agreement between the agency and a land grant institution to assist in the data collection of soil properties that would be beneficial to both the agency and the institution or to generate criteria property values for local interpretations and, in the process, afford students the opportunity to expand their knowledge of soil science. Resource soil scientists may serve as advisors to the project, but care must be taken not to violate ethics laws. Check with the local NRCS Ethics Liaison before entering into such associations.

(430-VI-TSSH, 2010)

i
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2192 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the non-application 
     of certain State waiver provisions to Members of Congress and 
                          congressional staff.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF NON-APPLICATION OF CERTAIN STATE WAIVER 
              PROVISIONS TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND CONGRESSIONAL 
              STAFF.

    If the American Health Care Act is enacted, effective as if 
included in the enactment of such Act, section 2701(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(5)(A)(ii)), as added by 
subsection (a) of section 136 of the American Health Care Act (relating 
to permitting States to waive certain ACA requirements to encourage 
fair health insurance premiums), is amended by striking 
``1312(d)(3)(D),''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the non-application 
     of certain State waiver provisions to Members of Congress and 
                          congressional staff.
```