alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy Act

# FOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

To avoid duplication of effort and delays in response times, please take note of the following requests that have already been submitted to the NRC. Responses to these FOIA requests will be made publicly available as soon as possible.

2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 21, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - FOIA Guide
          - Amendments to the FOIA "OPEN Government Act of 2007"
          - Freedom of Information Act
          - Open Government Assessment of the NRC's FOIA Process
          - NRC FOIA Backlog Reduction Goals for FY2008, FY2009, and FY2010
          - Privacy Act Request Guide
          - Processing Fees
          - FOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency
          - Closed Requests
          - Recent FOIA Requests
          - Privacy Act Systems of Records
          - Annual FOIA Reports
          - Quarterly FOIA Reports
          - Annual Chief FOIA Officer Reports
          - Contact Us About FOIA/Privacy Act, FOIA Team, and Public Liaison
          - Record Authentication
          - Reactor Operator License Verification

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search FOIA Information

#### Transcripts

            - ET Transcripts
            - HOO1 Transcripts
            - LIA Transcripts
            - Liaison Transcripts
            - PMT Transcripts
            - RST Transcripts
            - Public Affairs Transcripts
            - Transcript Logs
            -     DISCLAIMER
            Except for the marked redactions for FOIA withholding, these transcripts have not been edited or otherwise reviewed for accuracy by participants or the NRC.  The transcripts may contain typographical mistakes or other transcription errors.

#### Notice

Please direct questions concerning these requests to Stephanie Blaney, the NRC FOIA Officer, at (301) 415-6975.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 21, 2021
# C_2004262EN.01004102.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/41

---

Action brought on 15 July 2004 by Monika Luxem against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-306/04)

(2004/C 262/79)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 July 2004 by Monika Luxem, residing in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

| — | annul the Commission's decision not to appoint her an official of the European Communities, not to assign her to DG DEV/A 2 to the post declared vacant under reference COM/2002/6022/F and refusing to assign her to any other post corresponding to her abilities and her professional qualifications and experience; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision not to appoint her an official of the European Communities, not to assign her to DG DEV/A 2 to the post declared vacant under reference COM/2002/6022/F and refusing to assign her to any other post corresponding to her abilities and her professional qualifications and experience;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant submitted her candidature for open competition COM/A/6/01 for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of external relations and the management of aid. In her candidature she stated that she had obtained a German diploma after three years of studies. Having passed the competition, she applied for a vacant post in the Commission. By letter of 30 July 2003 the Commission informed her that, having regard to her diploma, it was unable to accept her candidature. According to the Commission, only a German diploma obtained after four years' studies would satisfy the conditions for admission to the competition, which stipulated that the necessary diplomas must give access to doctoral studies.

In support of her action for annulment of that decision, the applicant pleads breach of the principle of legal certainty, the unlawfulness of withdrawing a decision that has conferred rights on an individual, infringement of the competition notice in question and a manifest error of assessment.

---
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NextPhase Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form
  10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Hemingway, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:
  1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 February
      23, 2009
              /s/ Thomas
      HemingwayThomas
      HemingwayChief
      Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
# Wisconsin State Office

8030 Excelsior DriveSuite 200MadisonWI53717-2906

608-662-4422

8030 Excelsior DriveSuite 200MadisonWI53717-2906

Wisconsin

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Wisconsin 
-  Wisconsin State Office 

Contact your local NRCS office with questions about our programs and technical services.

##   State Office Employee Directory
# Pond (No.) (378) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Pond (No.) (378) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Pond (No.) (378).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Pond (No.) (378) (7/2022) Standard Document(196.18 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Pond (No.) (378) Overview(211.32 KB)

Pond (No.) (378) CPPE(25.16 KB)

Pond (No.) (378) Network Diagram(89.26 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Pond

This video explores how Dave Budeau of Turner, OR, constructed a pond to build wetland habitat on his land.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

59) IV-C-32 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:47 AM Sheet 59 of 273 
P.2 

A-94-52 

IV-C-32 

Original Message 

From: <Barnett.KeithSepamail.epa.gov> 

To: <keegan@glascraft.com>; <tomh@magind.com> 

Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:48 PM 

Subject: Definition of nonatomized spray 

EPA AIH DCX;;U 

Gentlemen: 

I have attached the current definition of nonatomized spray equipment we 

intend to use in the Reinforced Plastic Composites NESHAP. This 

definition is based on comments submitted by the Composites Fabricators 

Association (CFA) on the proposed rule. 

Please review the definition and respond to me with any comments or 

concerns. 

(See attached file: Nonatomized definition.wpd) 

Note that the equation referred to in the definition is identical to the 

nonatomized resin or nonatomized gel coat Unified Emission Factors 

published by the CFA. 

Keith W. Barnett 

US/EPA OAQPS, ESD/MICG C504-05 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

919-541-5605 

barnett.keith@epa.gov
# C_2004277EN.01000302.xml

| 12.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3454 — KKR/DYNAMIT NOBEL)

(2004/C 277/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3454. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3454. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50608

__________________ KENNETH LEE JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus ALICE BENNER; DELPHIS BENOIT; JACK M. GARNER, Warden; CHARLIE F. STREETMAN, Assistant Warden; FRANK WILLIAMS; GRACE E. KENNEDY Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CV-37
- - - - - - - - - - November 17, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Lee Johnson requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court's dismissal, under 28 U.S.C § 1915(d), of his civil rights complaint. IFP is GRANTED. The portion of the district court's order dismissing Johnson's claims which alleged violations of Due Process and the Eighth Amendment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by theNo. 95-50608 -2- district court. However, the district court's Final Judgment is VACATED and the matter REMANDED to allow the district court an opportunity to address Johnson's allegation concerning a violation of Equal Protection. We add our caution to that of the district court; if Johnson's equal-protection allegation is frivolous, he should voluntarily dismiss the claim to avoid the possible imposition, upon remand, of the sanctions the district court warned him about previously. IFP GRANTED; AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART; SANCTIONS WARNING GIVEN.
# C_2004273EN.01000402.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 September 2004

in Case C-385/02: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 93/37/EEC - Public works contracts - Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice)

(2004/C 273/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-385/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner and R. Amorosi) v Italian Republic (Agent: M. Fiorilli) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought before the Court on 28 October 2002, — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, as the Magistrato per il Po di Parma, a local agency of the Ministry of Public Works (now the Ministry for Infrastructure and Transport) awarded contracts for the completion of the construction of an overflow basin to retain flood waters of the Parma watercourse in the Marano area (in the Parma commune) as well as for works relating to the development and completion of an overflow basin for the Enza watercourse and to the retention of flood waters of the Terdoppio watercourse south-west of Cerano by the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, when the conditions necessary in that regard were not satisfied, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, as the Magistrato per il Po di Parma, a local agency of the Ministry of Public Works (now the Ministry for Infrastructure and Transport) awarded contracts for the completion of the construction of an overflow basin to retain flood waters of the Parma watercourse in the Marano area (in the Parma commune) as well as for works relating to the development and completion of an overflow basin for the Enza watercourse and to the retention of flood waters of the Terdoppio watercourse south-west of Cerano by the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, when the conditions necessary in that regard were not satisfied, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 323 of 21.12.2002.

1

---
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 08-0660

IN RE  SATTERFIELD & PONTIKES CONSTRUCTION, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s motion for emergency stay, filed October 2, 2008, is granted.   All trial court proceedings in Cause No. DC-06-74, styled *San Diego Independent School District v. Satterfield and Pontikes Construction, Inc.*, in the 229th District Court of Duval County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this October 17, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption for aggregation 

of emissions from oil and gas sources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. POLIS (for himself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. 

JUDY CHU of California, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. CONNOLLY, 

Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

HUFFMAN, Mr. KEATING, Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms. LEE, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MENG, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

PERLMUTTER, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. SOTO, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. TONKO, 

Ms. TSONGAS, and Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption 

for aggregation of emissions from oil and gas sources, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2059 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Reductions 

3 to Energy’s Airborne Toxic Health Effects Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘BREATHE Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXEMPTION FOR AGGREGATION OF 

6 EMISSIONS FROM OIL AND GAS SOURCES. 

7 Section 112(n) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7412(n)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

9 SEC. 3. HYDROGEN SULFIDE AS A HAZARDOUS AIR POL10 LUTANT. 

11 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

12 Agency shall— 

13 (1) not later than 180 days after the date of 

14 enactment of this Act, issue a final rule adding hy15 drogen sulfide to the list of hazardous air pollutants 

16 under section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act (42 

17 U.S.C. 7412(b)); and 

18 (2) not later than 365 days after a final rule 

19 under paragraph (1) is issued, revise the list under 

20 section 112(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(c)) to 

21 include categories and subcategories of major 

22 sources and area sources of hydrogen sulfide, includ23 ing oil and gas wells. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM May 2019

Wildlife Habitat Planting (420)

1. Establishing vegetation (herbaceous and/or shrubs)

Start

I.9 (+) Crop 

depredation by wildlife

D.3 (+) Plant diversity and

desired plant communities to 

benefit target wildlife species

D.1 (+) Cost for 

establishment 

and/or 

maintenance

I.13 (+) 

Recreational 

opportunities

I.5 (+) Use of 

habitat by 

target and 

non-target 

species 

C.1 (+/-) Income and income stability

(individuals and community)

C.2 (+) Health and populations of 

domestic animals and wildlife 

Initial setting:

Upland landscapes 

where wildlife habitat 

improvement is desired

I.10 (+/-) Health and 

population of target 

species

I.11 (+/-) Health and 

population of nontarget species

I.12 (+/-) 

Potential 

income

I.1 (-) Ag income

to producer

I.4 (-) Sediment transport 

and sedimentation

I.8 (+) Water 

quality and 

aquatic habitats 

I.6 (+) 

Connectivity; 

(-) habitat 

fragmentation

I.2 (+) Quality and quantity of 

food, shelter and cover 

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

I.3 (+) Plant 

biomass 

C.3 (+) Soil 

quality

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) 

or minus (-). These symbols indicate 

only an increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the resource, not 

whether the effect is beneficial or 

adverse.

* Management activities are species, 

guild, suite or ecosystem specific; 

see network diagrams for individual 

component practices for impacts 

(e.g., Prescribed Burning)

Prescribed Burning (338)

Brush Management (314)

D.2 (-) Acres of 

cropland 

production

D.4 (-) Erosion (wind 

and water caused)

I.7 (-) Presence of 

invasive plant 

species

Fence (382)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment

(315)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference: Held in Portland, Oregon, July 15–18, 1996 (NUREG/CP-0153, CONF-960715)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0153 (PDF - 43.3 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** August 1997

**Conference Sponsored by:** Office of Environmental Guidance U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

International Society of Nuclear Air Treatment Technologies, Inc. 4400 Glen Willow Lake Lane  Batavia, OH 45103

The Harvard Air Cleaning Laboratory Harvard School of Public Health 665 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115-6021

**Proceedings Edited by:** M.W. First

**Proceedings Prepared by:** The Harvard Air Cleaning Laboratory Harvard School of Public Health 665 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115

NRC Job Code G6543

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains the papers presented at the 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference and the associated discussions. Major topics are: (1) nuclear air cleaning issues, (2) waste management, (3) instrumentation and measurement, (4) testing air and gas cleaning systems, (5) progress and challenges in cleaning up Hanford, (6) international nuclear programs, (7) standardized test methods, (8) HVAC, (9) decommissioning, (10) computer modeling applications, (11) adsorption, (12) iodine treatment, (13) filters, and (14) codes and standards for filters and adsorbers.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Road, Critical Area Planting, Obstruction Removal, Spoil Spreading

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.