alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004118EN.01000701.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-91/01: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(State aid - Recommendation concerning the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises - Guidelines for State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises - Independence criterion - Protection of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)

(2004/C 118/12)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-91/01: Italian Republic (Agent: I. Braguglia, assisted by D. Del Gaizo), with an address for service in Luxembourg v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci and J. M. Flett), with an address for service in Luxembourg — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2001/779/EC of 15 November 2000 on the State aid which Italy is planning to grant to Solar Tech Srl (OJ 2001 L 292, p. 45), in so far as it did not allow the application to that aid of the bonus of 15 % gross grant equivalent provided for for small and medium-sized enterprises — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. W. A. Timmermans, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, A. Rosas and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs; Registrar: M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2001.

1

---
# Events

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 

# Filter Events by:

### CANCELED: Vermont State Technical Committee Meeting

**NOTE: This State Technical Committee meeting has been cancelled.**

State Technical Committee meeting for the Vermont Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Vermont

### Local Work Group Meeting- Potomac Valley Conservation District

The Potomac Valley Conservation District in cooperation with USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will hold a local work group meeting to discuss conservation programs and provide guidance for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). 

West Virginia

### Wisconsin State Technical Committee Meeting - April 2024

The Natural Resources Conservation Service in Wisconsin will host a hybrid (in-person with Microsoft Teams video conference option) State Technical Committee Meeting on Thursday April 18, 2024 at the USDA-NRCS State Office in Madison, Wisconsin.

WisconsinAirAnimalsClimateEnergyLandPlantsSoilWaterWildlife HabitatCroplandsEasementsForestryInsects and PollinatorsOrganic AgricultureRange & PastureSoil HealthTreesUrban AgricultureWetlandsWildlifeConservation Stewardship ProgramEnvironmental Quality Incentives ProgramRegional Conservation Partnership Program

### Source Water Collaborative Webinar: Updating the USDA NRCS High Priority Source Water Protection Areas

This Source Water Collaborative webinar will focus on the 2024 opportunity to update the USDA NRCS high priority source water protection areas and agricultural and forestry practices, in particular climate-smart practices that can be added this year. 

New HampshireWaterNational Water Quality InitiativeSource Water Protection

### Winter Grazing Pasture Walk

This pasture walk will leave you with the knowledge to guide you towards successfully implementing winter grazing on your farm!

WisconsinAnimalsLandRange & Pasture

### Small Farm Solar Power & Cooler - Hmong Farmer Workshop

Discover how small farm operations can benefit from installing solar panels.

Wisconsin

### NRCS Conservation Hiring Events

Do you want to work for a premier conservation agency whose mission is to "help people help the land"? Come Celebrate Earth Day with us by applying to a conservation career! We will be holding two career fairs in Puerto Rico.

Caribbean Area

### Crow Tribal Montana Local Working Group Meeting

NRCS is hosting meetings to gather input from local stakeholders to help prioritize natural resource concerns and guide funding opportunities.

Montana

### Crow Tribal Montana Local Working Group Meeting

NRCS is hosting meetings to gather input from local stakeholders to help prioritize natural resource concerns and guide funding opportunities.

Montana

### 2024 RCPP NFO Applicant Outreach Webinar

This webinar will provide general information for applicants submitting proposals for the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP). 

TexasRegional Conservation Partnership Program

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-   ...  
-   Next  
-   Last
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2021

LEGEND

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D.5 (+) Streambank vegetation D.2 (-) Tributary 

gully erosion

D.1 (-) Streambank 

and/or bed erosion.

D.3 (-) On-site 

sediment deposition

D.4 (+) Stream water 

surface profile

Initial setting: Beds of existing streams or constructed 

channels where damaging degration or aggradation 

cannot be controlled by other means.

Start

Measure(s) used to stabilize the bed 

or bottom of a channel

D. Direct effect

#. Created by 

practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

I.2 (+) Structural 

wildlife habitat 

elements

Channel Bed Stabilization (584)

C.1 (+) Water Quality

C.2 (+/-) Land use efficiency and 

area for flood-tolerant agricultural 

usage or other usage consistent 

with intermittent flooding.

C.3 (+) On-site flood 

frequency and duration

I.4 (+) 

Groundwater 

storage

I.8 (+) 

Wildlife 

food

I.6 (-) Water 

temperature

I.3 (+) Floodplain 

floodwater storage.

I.1 (+) Damages from 

suspended sediment 

leaving site

I.5 (+) Plant 

suitability for 

wildlife habitat

I.7 (+) Wildlife 

cover

C.4 (-) Off-site flood 

frequency and duration

C.5 (+) Water Quantity

C.6 (+) Fish and Wildlife 

habitat

Critical Area Planting (342) 

Grade Stabilization Structure (410)

Riparian Forest Buffer (391) 

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390)

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (580) 

Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (395)
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Guam - Fiscal Year 2024
Exhibit 99.01


                                CERTIFICATION OF

                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                      AND

                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Lockwave
Technologies, Inc.

Dated: October 15, 2002       By: /s/ Paul Steo
                                      ---------------
                              Name:   Paul Steo
                              Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
# C_2004285EN.01000101.xml

| 23.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 November 2004

(2004/C 285/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3033 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4312 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70255 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9569 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5157 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1680 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,090 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6809 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4325 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2283 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 678 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,255 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 877 000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6657 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5517 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1316 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8360 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1436 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 388,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8312 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3033

JPY

Japanese yen

134,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4312

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70255

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9569

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5157

ISK

Iceland króna

87,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1680

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

31,090

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6809

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4325

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2283

ROL

Romanian leu

39 678

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,255

TRL

Turkish lira

1 877 000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6657

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5517

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1316

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8360

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1436

KRW

South Korean won

1 388,54

ZAR

South African rand

7,8312

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 10.2




                             Promissory Note
$ 75,000.00 USD               Temple, Texas                    Date Mar.21, 2001


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 

              THE SUM OF SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00)

In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.5% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.

THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) principal due in one year (on or
before March 21, 2002). Interest of 4,500.00 per year payable in monthly amounts
of $375.00 on the 21st of each month

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
constitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.

                            David Hancock, President
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Road, Critical Area Planting, Nutrient Management, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Transfer, Waste Utilization, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: 

### To: Subject:
Mr. Adams, Chris Gill <cgill@gci.com> Wednesday, June 26, 2013 7:43 PM Adams, Kevin (OST} Tatitlek EAS comment

Isend this email to you in support of Reeve Air Alaska's proposal to provide airservice to Tatilek, Alaska. I am currently Directorof Project Management 

### & Implementation forGCI Communications. In this position both myself and myteams ofmanagers and technicians have utilized Reeve's services. Ifind Mike Reeve to be avery competent and safe pilot providing reliable service at competitive rates. Additionally, as afellow pilot, I respect Mikes skill, experience, and professionalism. Iencourage you to choose Reeve AirAlaska to provide air service to Tatilek, Alaska. Feel free to call me directlywith any questions.
Chris Gill Director, GCI Project Management and Implementation Desk: (907) 868-7098 Cell: 227-9352 email: cgill@gci.com

1 

## 1J
# C_2004300EN.01002202.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/22

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 7 October 2004

in Case C-341/03: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 98/49/EC)

(2004/C 300/45)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-341/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Michard and D. Martin) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 1 August 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet, F. Macken, S. von Bahr and J. Malenovský, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self-employed persons moving within the Community, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self-employed persons moving within the Community, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.9.2003.

1

---
# C_2004118EN.01002301.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/23

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-181/02 P: Commission of the European Communities v Kvaerner Warnow Werft GmbH (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Shipbuilding - Commission decisions authorising payment of aid - Condition - Compliance with a ‘capacity restriction’ - Definition)

(2004/C 118/40)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-181/02 P: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K.-D. Borchardt and V. Kreuschitz), with an address for service in Luxembourg – appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 February 2002 in Joined Cases T-227/99 and T-134/00 Kvaerner Warnow Werft v Commission [2002] ECR II-1205, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: Kvaerner Warnow Werft GmbH, established in Rostock-Warnemünde (Germany), (avocat: M. Schütte ) with an address for service in Luxembourg, – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, acting as President of the Fifth Chamber, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M. Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 169, 13.7.2002.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BURWELL & PARHAM v. EDWARD LAFFERTY.

*Attachment — Order of Publication — Serviee of*Summons,

In a proceeding by attachment, where the order for publication was for-four weeks instead of six, and no order was made to deposit a copy of~ the summons and complaint in the post-office directed to the defendant-, nor was such deposit made, the attachment should be vacated.

*(Spiers*v. Huisteá,.7t N. C. 209¡ cited and approved.)

ATTACHMENT, granted December 27, 1875, at Chambers im Eranklinton, by Watts, *J.*

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant was indebted to-them in the sum of $381.43 and had removed from this State; to Canada to avoid the serviee of legal process. For irregularities in the proceedings in the Court below the substance; of which is stated in the opinion, the case was not decided upon its merits. No further statement of the facts is deemed necessary.

Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal by defendant.

*Mr. W. H.*Young, for plaintiffs,

*Messrs. Moore Gatling*and *G. A. Cook,*for defendant.

Eairoloth, J.

It would be tedious to mention all the defects and irregularities of the proceedings on which the judgment was rendered in this case. There was no personal serviee of the summons nor any by publication as required by C. C. P. ch. 17, § 84. The order for publication was foi-four weeks whereas the statute requires six weeks and although it appears from the affidavit that the residence of the defendant was known, no order was made to deposit a copy of the summons and complaint in the post office directed to the defendant as required by said section nor was such deposit in fact made. The case of *Spiers*v. *Halsted,*71 *384N. C. 209, is decisive of this case. This Court bas so repeatedly defined the modes of proceeding in attachments that it is not necessary to 'repeat them here.

The defendant's motion is to vacate said judgment-which His Honor refused. We think it should have been allowed.

There is error.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.