alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,915,000               5,580,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  983,000               1,525,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    72,000                  60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,622,000               2,140,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,929,000               9,914,000
<PP&E>                                       5,091,000               4,411,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,266,000               2,464,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,057,000              12,263,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,835,000               1,887,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        64,000                  63,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,987,000              10,144,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,057,000              12,263,000
<SALES>                                      1,547,000               2,277,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,547,000               2,277,000
<CGS>                                        1,066,000               1,454,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,066,000               1,454,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,283,000               1,073,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (23,000)                (63,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (779,000)               (187,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (779,000)               (187,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 of
AMERALINK, INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
-------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CFO
# CA2004137EN.01000401.xml

| 15.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 137/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 137/4

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director (grade A2) in DG Information Society (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/083/04

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004

(2004/C 137 A/07)

Page 29: Closing Date

Closing Date

For:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 14 May 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

14 May 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 14 May 2004.’

14 May 2004

Read:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 1 June 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

1 June 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 1 June 2004.’

1 June 2004

---
# C_2004201EN.01000903.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/9

---

Action brought on 2 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-230/04)

(2004/C 201/18)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 2 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Rozet, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by not allowing to be taken into account the experience and seniority, in another Member State's public sector, of Community nationals who join the French hospital public service, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC and Article 7 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement of workers within the Community (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not allowing to be taken into account the experience and seniority, in another Member State's public sector, of Community nationals who join the French hospital public service, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC and Article 7 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement of workers within the Community (1);

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Member States are required to take into account, for the purposes of migrant workers' recruitment to, and grading and determination of seniority in their public services, employment periods in a comparable field of activity in another Member State, on the same conditions as apply to seniority and professional experience attained in the workers' own systems. The French provisions in force do not allow the experience and seniority, in another Member State's public sector, of Community nationals who join the French hospital public service to be taken into account.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 257, of 19.10.1968, p. 2.

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6962

MARTINEZ ORLANDIS BLACK , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:23

- cv - 00400

- RJC )

Submitted : January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Martinez Orlandis Black, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6962 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Martinez Orlandis Black appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, Black’s “Writ of Mandamus” as duplicative. We have reviewed the record and
discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Black v.
United States , No. 3:23

- cv - 00400

- RJC ( W.D.N.C

. Sept. 18, 2023 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6962 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1364** 

BANORO GARRETT ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; ROBERT J. MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; JANEL CUMMINGS ,
Defendants

– Appellees ,
and

THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF ’ S OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO; OFFICER H. G. WHITE; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; L. WILLIS; P. BELL; J. K IDD; DARRELL HILL ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv
- 00295

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa H. Leiner, HARM AN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Ruth Griggs, Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Banoro Garrett appeals the district court ’ s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Garrett v. Weiler , No. 2:12

- cv
- 00 295

- RAJ

- LRL (E.D. Va.

filed Mar. 25 & entered Mar. 26 , 2014) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09229

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

09229\09229_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09229\09229_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09229\09229_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09229\09229_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09229\09229_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09229\09229_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09229\09229_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09229\9229_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09229\Certification Statement Plant ID 09229.pdf Plant certification statement

09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_PartA_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF OFFICEROF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officerof AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

(a)                                  Thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)                                 Informationcontained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November13, 2006
| /s/ Heera Lee                |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| By: Heera Lee,               |
| Director of Finance and      |
| Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
HomeRadioactive WasteHigh-Level Waste DisposalKey DocumentsDOE's License Application for a High-Level Waste Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain

# Yucca Mountain  Repository License Application: General Information

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, July 13, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,571,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,607,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   203,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,655,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,726,586
<PP&E>                                       3,422,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 549,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,626,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,475,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,992
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,272,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,626,069
<SALES>                                      1,942,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,942,721
<CGS>                                        1,437,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,532,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,622,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (528,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,094,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,094,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. DEA-392]

# ACTION:

Notice of application.

# DATES:

Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before March 27, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers of controlled substances                           ( print page 3982)                        (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR pt. 0, subpt. R, App.                

In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on August 14, 2014, IRIX Manufacturing, Inc., 309 Delaware Street, Building 1106, Greenville, South Carolina 29605, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance as API for clinical trials.

Dated: January 9, 2015.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2015-01314 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued ourreport dated March 31, 2006 accompanying the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Annual Report of Channell Commercial Corporation on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005.  Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of Channell Commercial Corporation on Form S-8 (FileNo. 333-36097, filed September 22, 1997 and File No. 333-109771, filed October 17,2003).
| */s/ Grant Thornton LLP* |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Los Angeles, California  |   |
| April 2, 2007            |

 

----