alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004314EN.01001201.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 October 2004

in Case T-36/99: Lenzing AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(State aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Act of individual concern to the applicant - Article 87(1) EC - Agreements on the rescheduling and repayment of debts - Private creditor test)

(2004/C 314/30)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-36/99: Lenzing AG, established in Lenzing (Austria), represented initially by H.-J. Niemeyer, then by I. Brinker and U. Soltész, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz and D. Triantafyllou, assisted by M. Núñez-Müller, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 1999/395/EC of 28 October 1998 on State aid implemented by Spain in favour of Sniace, SA, located in Torrelavega, Cantabria (OJ 1999 L 149, p. 40), as amended by Commission Decision 2001/43/EC of 20 September 2000 (OJ 2001 L 11, p. 46) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh, J.D. Cooke, H. Legal and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 1999/395/EC of 28 October 1998 on State aid implemented by Spain in favour of Sniace, SA, located in Torrelavega, Cantabria, as amended by Commission Decision 2001/43/EC of 20 September 2000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 1999/395/EC of 28 October 1998 on State aid implemented by Spain in favour of Sniace, SA, located in Torrelavega, Cantabria, as amended by Commission Decision 2001/43/EC of 20 September 2000;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 160 of 5.6.1999.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 ARDEN REALTY, INC. COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
 ARDEN REALTY, INC.For the Years Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges:Net income
    
    
    65,499
    
    
    
    73,775
    
    
    
    58,509
    
    
    
    70,175
    
    
    
    97,759Add:Interest Expense(1)
    
    
    98,429
    
    
    
    89,515
    
    
    
    93,767
    
    
    
    88,516
    
    
    
    84,195Preferred Distributions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,309
    (2)
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312Total Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges
    
    
    163,928
    
    
    
    167,599
    
    
    
    156,588
    
    
    
    163,003
    
    
    
    186,266Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    
    98,429
    
    
    
    89,515
    
    
    
    93,767
    
    
    
    88,516
    
    
    
    84,195Interest Capitalized
    
    
    805
    
    
    
    936
    
    
    
    2,496
    
    
    
    5,646
    
    
    
    9,095
    (3)Preferred Distributions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,309
    (2)
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    99,234
    
    
    
    94,760
    
    
    
    100,575
    
    
    
    98,474
    
    
    
    97,602Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.65
    x
    
    
    1.77
    x
    
    
    1.56
    x
    
    
    1.66
    x
    
    
    1.91
    x
 
 (1)
    
    Includes interest expense for properties classified as part of discontinued operations.(2)
    
    Includes approximately $1.1 million of original issuance costs written off in conjunction
with the redemption of the Preferred OP units on September 28, 2004.(3)
    
    Includes approximately $2.5 million of interest capitalized on an office property that was
classified as part of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certify, to their knowledge,
that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 12, 2005                  /s/ Bharatan R. Patel
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bharatan R. Patel
                                        Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer


Dated: August 12, 2005                  /s/ Brian A. Byrne
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Brian A. Byrne
                                        Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer


                                       25
# C_2005006EN.01004202.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/42

---

Action brought on 22 October 2004 by Alex Milbert and Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-434/04)

(2005/C 6/83)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 October 2004, by Alex Milbert, residing in Hesperange (Luxembourg), Imre Czigàny, residing in Rhode St. Genèse (Belgium), José Manuel De la Cruz González, residing in Brussels, Viviane Deveen, residing in Overijse (Belgium), Mohammad Reza Fardoom, residing in Roodt-sur-Syre (Luxembourg), Laura Gnemmi, residing in Hünsdorf (Luxembourg), Marie-José Reinard, residing in Bertrange (Luxembourg), Vassilios Stergiou, residing in Kraainem (Belgium) and Ioannis Terezakis, residing in Brussels, represented by G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the list of officials promoted under the 2003 procedure, in so far as that list does not include the applicants' names, and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the list of officials promoted under the 2003 procedure, in so far as that list does not include the applicants' names, and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision;

| — | Alternatively, annul the allocation of promotion points under the 2003 procedure in relation to the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively, annul the allocation of promotion points under the 2003 procedure in relation to the applicants;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, Commission officials, were not promoted under the 2003 procedure. By their action, they question the system used by the Commission for that procedure, in so far as that system provides for the addition to merit and seniority points awarded to each official, ‘reliquat’ points awarded to officials on the list of officials eligible for promotion in the previous procedure but not promoted, as well as points awarded by the Directorates-General, special transitional points, points in the interests of the service and ‘appeal’ points awarded by the Promotions Committee. The applicants claim that by operating such a system the Commission did not, in breach of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and the General Provisions for its implementation, consider the comparative merits of the officials eligible for promotion.

On the same basis, the applicants plead breach of the principle of non-discrimination, of the ban on arbitrary procedures, of the duty to state reasons, of the principle of legitimate expectations, of the rule ‘patere legem quam ipse facit’ and of the duty to have regard to the interests of officials.

---
# C_2004314EN.01001105.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/11

---

Removal from the register of Case C-72/04 (1)

(2004/C 314/28)

By order of 24 September 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-72/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
OcT-CST-QOoS^-U^llUnited States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Services ' ;' 

OST-2068-0217 

To Whom it May Concern, 

I am a resident of Kake, Alaska which currently receives air transportation services from Wings 

of Alaska. Since the departure of L.A.B., Wings has been providing dependable and safe air 

transportation to our community. I am also the activities director at Kake high school, and 

appreciate Wings' Cessna 208 caravan which can accommodate considerable cargo and 9 

passengers. This provides comfortable and efficient travel to and from athletic events, especially 

since our teams can travel in one plane rather than two or three. It is my understanding that 

without a mail contract. Wings would no longer find it profitable to provide services to our 

community. Your continued support of Wings of Alaska will help assure a continuation of safe, 

convenient and comfortable air transportation for Kake's students and residents. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

David Grimes 

Activities Director 

Kake City Schools
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 32529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12868]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 355]

Delegation to the Assistant Secretary for Political-Military 
Affairs of Authority To Concur With Secretary of Defense Assignments of 
Certain Civilian Personnel

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112-81) (the NDAA) and Section 1 of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and 
delegated to me by the Secretary of State in Delegation of Authority 
245-1, dated February 13, 2009, I hereby delegate to the Assistant 
Secretary of Political-Military Affairs, to the extent authorized by 
law, the authority to concur with a Secretary of Defense assignment of 
civilian personnel to the Ministry of Defense (or security agency 
serving a similar defense function) of a foreign country that is made 
pursuant to subsection 1081(a) of the NDAA.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, any function or 
authority delegated by this Delegation may be exercised by the 
Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management 
and Resources, or the Under Secretary for Arms Control and 
International Security. Any reference in this delegation of authority 
to any statute or delegation of authority shall be deemed to be a 
reference to such statute or delegation of authority as amended from 
time to time.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: April 10, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-12868 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
```
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2014

C.4 (+) Habitat suitability; 

health for humans, domestic, 

and wild animals

Initial setting: Cropland

3. Fibrous and/or 

deep-rooted crops

Conservation Crop Rotation (328) Start

D.9 (+) 

Balanced 

plant 

nutrients

D.4 (+) 

Livestock feed

D.5 (+) Healthy, 

productive 

crops

D.1 (+) Pest

cycles broken

C.2 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters

C.1 (+) Income and

income stability 

(individuals and

community)

I.1 (-) Pest 

populations 

D10 (-) 

Offsite loss of 

nutrients

D7 (+) Wildlife 

food and cover

I.2 (+) Rotation 

intensity

I.9 (+) Soil chemical 

and biological quality

I.7 (+) Stream/lake

fauna, e.g., fish,

invertebrates

1. Crops grown in 

recurring sequence

I.6 (-) Nutrients, 

pesticides, and/or 

sediments to ground 

and surface water

2. Sufficient biomass produced 

for planned purposes

C.3 (+) Fishable, 

swimmable, and 

drinkable waters

D.11 (-) Saline seeps

D.8 (-)

Wind and water 

erosion

I.5 (+) Soil tilth

D.6 (+) Soil 

organic matter

I.3 (+) Farmer 

income

D.3 (+) Even workload 

distribution

D.2 (+) Water 

use efficiency

I.8 Air effects:

 (-) Airborne 

 particulate matter 

 (+) Visibility

 (-) Haze

C.5 (+) Air quality of 

airshed

I.4 (-) Greenhouse gas 

emissions

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                             |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Jason Brown                                                   |   |   |        |
| Jason                Brown Chairman                  and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |        |
|                                                                             |   |   |   |
| Dated:                April 2, 2007                                              |   |   |        |

|                                                                   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |   |   |
| /s/                Jonathan Wernick                                    |   |   |        |
| Jonathan                Wernick Chief                Financial Officer |   |   |        |
|                                                                   |   |   |   |
| Dated:                April 2, 2007                                    |   |   |        |

----
# C_2005001EN.01000101.xml

| 4.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 January 2005

(2005/C 1/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3507 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4371 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70725 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9758 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5444 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,39 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5800 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,361 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6964 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4343 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0774 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 230 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8150 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7329 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6278 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5055 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8877 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,2113 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 402,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5893 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3507

JPY

Japanese yen

138,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4371

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70725

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9758

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5444

ISK

Iceland króna

83,39

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5800

CZK

Czech koruna

30,361

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6964

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4343

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0774

ROL

Romanian leu

39 230

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,655

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8150

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7329

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6278

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5055

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8877

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,2113

KRW

South Korean won

1 402,16

ZAR

South African rand

7,5893

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005048EN.01000601.xml

| 24.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3645 — INDUSTRI KAPITAL/IDEX)

(2005/C 48/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3645. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3645. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
### SERVED: OCTOBER28, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF UNITED PARCEL SERVICE COMPANY. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0806 (Civil Penalty Action)


### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011CE250036) has been assignedto Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 ONE COPY 

### Mark A. Dombroff, Respondent's Counsel 

### McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP 1676 International Drive- Penthouse McLean, VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8700 Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0806 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                   /s/ J. Ardie Dillen
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Name: J. Ardie Dillen
                                   Title: Chairman, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

Date: May 15, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.