alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

1. Lining installed in irrigation supply ditches and canals

Irrigation Ditch Lining (428)

I.2. (+) Plant 

productivity 

and vigor 

Initial Settings: All land between 

water source and point(s) of use 

and downstream areas affected by 

seepage losses.

Start

D.2 (+) Efficient use of 

water on irrigated land.

I.1 (+) Cost 

to farmer

C.2 (+/-) Environmental 

Quality

I.3. (-) 

Pumping 

requirements 

I.5. (-) Soil 

erosion 

I.9. (+) 

Farm/ranch 

profitability 

I.7. (-) Existing 

established riparian 

habitat dependent upon 

seepage. 

I.4. (+) 

Water 

quantity 

C.1 (+) Income stability

 (individuals and 

community)

D.1 (+) Construction, 

infrastructure and 

operating costs

I.8 (+) 

Agribusiness

D.3 (-) Water conveyance 

losses from seepage.

I.6. (-) Nutrients in 

surface and ground 

water

I.10. (-) 

Sediment 

deposition in 

watercourses 

C.3 (+) Water Quality
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROVIDENT COMPANIES, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        11,104,100
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          259,900
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            248,400
<EQUITIES>                                       5,000
<MORTGAGE>                                       4,600
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  161,800
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              13,383,900
<CASH>                                          28,800
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         509,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,191,300
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,970,400
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 384,900
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        4,123,900
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                353,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    156,200
<COMMON>                                        45,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,473,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,191,300
<PREMIUMS>                                     883,300
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            822,100
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (10,000)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  28,000
<BENEFITS>                                   1,262,400
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     48,800
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           253,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>"POLICY-LOSSES" INCLUDE RESERVES FOR FUTURE POLICY AND CONTRACT BENEFITS OF
$7,911,400 AND UNEARNED PREMIUMS OF $59,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
N-IN SHEET 

;tX 

 ,4-e c f; ? ..r1 2 ,,..J(J-

nt) 

; 

 ~ )V\.V<A 

o 

 

~ 

Company 

EPA- I ,J/7/Jr r (' D 

£ PA/o.PPI ~~~AP 

£P!f.joPPT(cEs

~ 

C.pfli C'PPI I C..\.._:>:,.JJ 

F f (I I 0 f PI I c ( D 

fPt:t/ o PP/

1 

f,Ncf'{!3 

er A(ofrr c co 

t=f~/

ff! ceo 

.D Yt\J4_>t 

/ , 

f 

E-Mail 

k:f? 4 s,.A-'1( Tt.:/V/6-' f:: I ,d- /I.-e- L. 

e-\-i!C>c:>6,. t(\.~c\~ e. ~·_50\J 

f~e . Jcjouu 1@ <?fa • <jCIV 

"=>0Rte.l1 . .f.~~b

.:-.G::-' q,.:. · .·1""". 

Phone 

?o,· - J'"G.y- ufcP}'-

2o2.. - 564- 85~ r l 

l- r-6t£ -Ff-1 r 

~c-~

",)G

'-\-

'S...,•; 6 

?" 'i ,e . \ o ..- ,, --t E e~a._. ') u v' '1.. o"} - \Co4 - '1 (.':) ~4 

A I 

~' ':>tn I ' ({:ij2-/i) q,:. ·f aV ?ff2./ SG '-1- ~ 1 b 

J:tCll fV\ \ilJJ-1 Q € { f' tL n c- D v 2£ z_ _5 ~ _& c 1 B 

s ('GUs lv\au 1 ka1h ff;~O>eparv ~ NV~ - ~ (b tt- 7{ I~ 

b.tyRAJ. R.tl-m bo@ dpJA't~ t.orl f/Cf f~'( Oz. o Z.... 

c haj,Jh~l(i) .Ji'''"'>' urp.c,.,., 

.kl 

A~ .. 

"t~07/lVLYC4y. ~ 

/IV 1 0 c; (} 2-0 L . 

// 
dynax corporation 

79 westchester avenue 

p.o. box 285 

pound ridge, ny 1 0576 

tel: 914-764-0202 

fax: 914-764-0553 

DATE: 

TO: 

March 24, 2015 

Mr. Toni Krasnic 

EPA 

Email: krasnic.toni@epa.gov 

FROM: Eduard Kleiner 

Dynax 

Email: ed.kleiner@dynaxcorp.com 

SUBJECT: EPA I Dynax Meeting March 25, 2015 

Dear Mr. Toni, 

A 

DYNAX 

EMAIL 

I like to confirm that Dr. Chang Jho, Mr. Bryan Rambo and myself will attend the above 

meeting scheduled for 1 :00 pm. 

We will arrive at Reagan National at 9:21 am and spend some time with Tom Cortina 

of FFFC before the EPA/Dynax meeting and can be reached via cell phone 

(914) 629 0297 (Dr. Chang Jho) while in Washington. 

It would be great if you could let me know who from the EPA will attend the meeting or 

how many people will attend. This would help us to prepare for the meeting. Do you 

think it will help if we bring with us multiple copies of our response to the Proposed Rule 

(EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0225) that we mailed out to your attention last week? 

Thanks for your help and best regards, 

EK!ag 

Ed~E~ 

d nax
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Spring Development (Code 574) 

A spring development collects water from a spring or seep

that is used for livestock, wildlife, or other agricultural

purposes. 

Practice Information 

A spring development can be installed where a spring or

seep will provide a dependable supply of suitable water for

the planned use. 

Springs are developed by removing obstructions to the flow and collecting the water. The type of

collection system used for the spring development is dependent upon the type of spring and site

geology. Collection systems generally consist of a restrictive barrier that forces water to collect in a

perforated pipe that flows to an outlet. 

It may also be necessary to provide a means of storing the water if flow from the spring is not

sufficient to meet the peak demand of the intended use. A spring box can be made of concrete,

plastic, galvanized steel, or naturally rot-resistant wood. The spring box also functions as a sediment

trap. 

Installation of a spring development may have an effect on the nearby plant and wildlife communities.

Consider options to minimize any adverse impacts. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 20 years. Operation and maintenance of a spring

development includes periodic removal of sediment from the spring box, keeping outlets and overflow

pipes clear, and repairing rodent damage and erosion from overflow pipes. It also includes keeping

surface water diverted away from the spring. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Spring Development (Code 574) is commonly applied

with CPSs such as Livestock Pipeline (Code 516) and Watering Facility (Code 614). It can also be

used with some irrigation practices. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5, TRACE and APROS Model Benchmark for the IAEA SPE-2 Experiment (NUREG/IA-0544)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0544 (PDF - 6.77 MB)

## Publication Information

Prepared by:R. Orosz, T. Varju, Á. Aranyosy, V. Holl, T. Hajas & A. AszódiBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsInstitute of Nuclear TechniquesMűegyetem rkp. 3.1111 Budapest, Hungary

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager**Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001**

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2023**Date Published:** March 2024

Prepared as part ofThe Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

******Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001****

****Availability Notice****

## ****Abstract****

****I****n the recent decades, with the ever-growing computational capacity, system codes have become essential tools at research and development activities, assessments and licencing procedures of NPPs and research reactors. Among others, a broad literature of assessments performed with RELAP5 and TRACE codes is now available, proving the reliability of the produced results.

In one of our previous studies, dealing with the IAEA SPE-4 benchmark test, we evaluated and compared our simulation results of multiple system codes, namely RELAP5, TRACE and the Finnish APROS. The current study could be considered as the continuation of the mentioned one, as both tests were conducted on the PMK-2 integral test facility in Budapest, Hungary. Although both benchmarks are dealing with a CL-SBLOCA transient, there are several key differences greatly influencing the transient behaviour, such as the availability of emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) or the secondary side bleed and feed operation.

As there are significantly less studies dealing with this particular test and those available resulted, on average, in lower accuracy compared to those of the SPE-4, we decided to investigate it simultaneously with three system codes: RELAP5, TRACE and APROS. The results have been evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively through FFTBM and SARBM methods.

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, April 01, 2024
#### Randem, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Crawford & Crawford*of Superior.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E.*Martin, attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents Philadelphia & Reading Coal Company and Employers Liability Assurance Corporation: *Hanitch,*Johnson, *Fritschler & Barstow*of Superior.

*By the Court.*

-Judgment affirmed.
#### STATE v. JAMES KEESLER.

*Indictment*— Incest.

Incest is not an indictable offence in this State.

INDICTMENT for Incest, tried at Fall Terra, 1877, of Cherokee Superior Court, before *Farches, J.*

The defendant was charged with having had an improper intercourse with his own daughter, and was found guilty by the jury, and upon motion of the defendant’s counsel, His Honor arrested the judgment upon the ground that the bill of indictment did not charge a criminal offence, and Teds? Solicitor for the State, appealed.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

No counsel for the defendant.

Bynun J.

The defendant is indicted for incest. This; offence was not indictable at common law, and as we have-no statute in this State declaring it to be a criminal offence, this indictment cannot be maintained. It is related that in the time of the Commonwealth in England, when the ruling-powers found it for their interest to put on the semblance of extraordinary strictness and purity of morals, incest and. wilful adultery were made capital crimes; but at the Restoration, when men from the abhorrence of the hypocrisy of the late times fell into a contrary extreme of licentiousness, it was not thought proper to renew the law of such tfn-fashionable rigor; and these offences have been ever since-left to the feeble coercion of the Spiritual Court according to the canon law. 4 Bl. 64; 2 Tomlin L. D. 160; Bish. Stat. Cr., §§ 725, 728; Bish. Mar. & Div. §§ 313, 315.

In most of the States of the Union incest is made an in*470dictable offence by statute. Perhaps its rare occurrence in this State has caused the revolting crime to pass unnoticed by the Legislature.

No error.

Per CüRIAM. - Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

                            FORM OF AMENDMENT TO THE
               WILLIS AWARD PLAN FOR KEY EMPLOYEES OF TA I LIMITED

      Pursuant to Section 10 of the Willis Award Plan for Key Employees of TA I
Limited (the "PLAN"), the Board of Directors of Willis Group Holdings Limited,
which, effective as of May 9, 2001, adopted the Plan, hereby amends the Plan as
follows:

1.    All references to "TA I Limited" shall hereinafter refer to "Willis
Group Holdings Limited".

2.    All references to "Ordinary Shares" or "Share" shall hereinafter refer to
management common shares of Willis Group Holdings Limited.


Effective as of this ___________, 2001.
# C_2004219EN.01000801.xml

| 1.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/8

---

Reopening the continuous submission scheme for the Call for proposals for indirect actions under the Multiannual Community Action Plan on promoting safer use of the Internet and new online technologies (2003 to 2004) (Safer Internet Action Plan)

(2004/C 219/03)

The call for proposals published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 209 of 4 September 2003, on page 31 indicated as the final deadline for receipt of proposals under the continuous submission scheme: 15 June 2004 at 17h00.

Official Journal of the European Union

This continuous submission scheme is reopened and a new final deadline is now set for receipt of proposals: 29 October 2004 at 17h00 (Luxembourg local time). Proposals will therefore be considered until this date.

The European Commission also published a call for proposals for pilot projects in the field of self-regulation on 4 August 2004. This call has a fixed deadline of 29 October 2004.

Both calls are published at http://europa.eu.int/information_society/programmes/iap/call/index_en.htm

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Community Oriented Policing Services; Public Meeting With the 
President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing Discussing Best 
Practices and Recommendations

AGENCY: Community Oriented Policing Services, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 18, 2014, President Barack Obama signed an 
Executive Order titled ``Establishment of the President's Task Force on 
21st Century Policing'' establishing the President's Task Force on 21st 
Century Policing (``Task Force''). The Task Force seeks to identify 
best practices and make recommendations to the President on how 
policing practices can promote effective crime reduction while building 
public trust and examine, among other issues, how to foster strong, 
collaborative relationships between local law enforcement and the 
communities they protect. The Task Force will be holding a public 
teleconference.
    The meeting agenda is as follows:

Call to Order
Discussion of best practices and recommendations
Conclusion

DATES: The teleconference will be held Tuesday, February 24, 2015 from 
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
    For disability access please call 1-800-888-8888 (TTY users call 
via Relay).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by teleconference only. To access 
the conference line, please call 1-866-906-7447 and, when prompted, 
enter access code 8072024#.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Ronald L. Davis, 202-514-
4229 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92c2fdfefbf1fbfcf5c6f3e1f9d4fde0f1f7d2e7e1f6fdf8bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2a29d9e9b919b9c95a6938199b49d809197b28781969d98dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Address all comments concerning this notice to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5b58a898c868c8b82b184968ea38a978680a59096818a8fcb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04546b686d676d6a635065776f426b766761447177606b6e2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access and Filing Addresses

    The Task Force is interested in receiving written comments 
including proposed recommendations from individuals, groups, advocacy 
organizations, and professional communities. Additional information on 
how to provide your comments will be posted to www.cops.usdoj.gov/PolicingTaskForce.
    Availability of Meeting Materials: The agenda and other materials 
in support of the teleconference will be available on the Task Force 
Web site at www.cops.usdoj.gov/PolicingTaskForce in advance of the 
teleconference.

Ronald L. Davis,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-02463 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 1, 2020

No. 04-20-00458-CV

Axelle Francine PARKER,

Appellant

v.

William A. PARKER II,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI15237

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal. The clerk’s record was due on September 25, 2020. The 

trial court clerk has filed a notification of late clerk’s record, stating that the appellant has failed 

to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that the appellant 

is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s fee has been paid or 

arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without 

paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal for 

want of prosecution if clerk’s record is not filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Filter Strip (Ac.) (393).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) (9/16) Standard Document(127.92 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) Overview(316.79 KB)

Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) CPPE(25.88 KB)

Filter Strip (Ac.) (393) Network Diagram(193.04 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2004284EN.01000402.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 30 September 2004

in Case C-319/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Paris): Serge Briheche v Ministre de l'Intérieur, Ministre de l'Éducation nationale and Ministre de la Justice (1)

1

(Social policy - Equal treatment of men and women - Article 141(4) EC - Directive 76/207/EEC - Conditions of access to public-sector employment - Provisions reserving to widows who have not remarried the benefit of the exemption from the age-limit for obtaining access to that employment)

(2004/C 284/08)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-319/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal administratif de Paris (France), made by decision of 3 July 2003, received at the Court on 24 July 2003, in the proceedings between Serge Briheche and Ministre de l'Intérieur, Ministre de l'Éducation nationale and Ministre de la Justice — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, F. Macken (Rapporteur) and N. Colneric, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 3(1) and Article 2(4) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a national provision, such as that in question in the main proceedings, which reserves the exemption from the age-limit for obtaining access to public-sector employment to widows who have not remarried who are obliged to work, excluding widowers who have not remarried who are in the same situation.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 20.9.2003.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00620

- CV

Rosa Obregon PEREZ , Ricardo O. Perez, individually and as next friend of Rosa Elia P erez,

Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez,

Appellant s

v.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26130

Robert Cadena, Judge Pre siding



### O R D E R

On October 23, 2015 , the appe llee filed a motion for en banc reconsideration . The Court

requests that the appell ant s file a response on or before November 23, 2015

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

49.2.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court