alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 07 4

. D A NI EL ERI C COBBLE v

. GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTI ONS et a l

.

Dan i el Eri c Co bb l e fi l ed t h i s d i rec t a p p e a l fro m t he s u p eri o r co u rt ’ s o rd er

d en y i n g h i s req u es t t o p ro ceed i n fo rm a p au p eri s i n a ci vi l act io n. Becau s e Co b b l e i s

i n c a r cerat ed

, h i s ap p eal i s co n tro l l ed b y t h e Pri s o n Li t ig at i o n Refo rm A ct o f 1 9 9 6

, OCGA § 4 2 -1 2 -1 et s eq

. Un d er OCGA § 4 2 -1 2 -8

, an ap p eal in a ci vi l act io n fi l ed by

a pri s o n er “ s h al l b e as p ro v i d ed i n Co d e Sect i o n 5 -6 -3 5 .” An d u n d er O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5,

t h e p art y wi s h i n g t o ap p eal m u s t fi l e an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary a pp eal t o t h e

ap p ro p ri at e ap p el lat e co urt

. Becau s e a p ri s o n er h as n o ri g h t o f d i rect ap p eal i n ci v i l

cas es , w e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er t h i s d i rect ap p eal fro m t he su p eri o r co urt ’ s

o rd er. See Jo n es v. To wn sen d

, 2 6 7 Ga. 4 8 9

, 4 9 0 (4 8 0 SE2 d 2 4 ) (1 9 97 ). Th i s ap p eal

i s t herefo re DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 16, 2019

08/16/2019
# C_2004250EN.01000101.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 October 2004

(2004/C 250/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2315 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4399 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6891 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,068 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5529 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,48 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,576 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,36 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6649 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4289 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,331 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 050 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,92 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,025 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 845 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6944 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5475 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5937 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8193 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0769 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 413,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1603 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2315

JPY

Japanese yen

136,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4399

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6891

SEK

Swedish krona

9,068

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5529

ISK

Iceland króna

87,48

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,576

CZK

Czech koruna

31,36

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6649

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4289

PLN

Polish zloty

4,331

ROL

Romanian leu

41 050

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,92

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,025

TRL

Turkish lira

1 845 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6944

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5475

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5937

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8193

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0769

KRW

South Korean won

1 413,76

ZAR

South African rand

8,1603

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004177EN.01000402.xml

| 9.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3411 — UGC / NOOS)

(2004/C 177/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3411. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3411. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
HomeRadioactive WasteStorage of Spent Nuclear FuelSpent Fuel Pools

# Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Guidance Documents

        - NUREG – 1801: Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report Revision 2
        - LR-ISG 2009-01: Aging Management of Spent Fuel Pool Neutron-Absorbing Materials Other Than Boraflex – ML100621321

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Criticality Management Documents
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Public Meeting Materials
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Generic Communications
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Guidance Documents
          - Spent Fuel Pools Key Documents: Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.1  


 
  EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE
  FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT
  OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF
  WESTFIELD AMERICA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP    
  


    This EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF WESTFIELD AMERICA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, dated as of May 2,
2001 (this "Amendment"), is among Westfield America, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the "Managing General
Partner"), as the managing general partner of Westfield America Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), and on behalf of the Limited Partners pursuant to the authority conferred on the Managing General Partner by Sections 2.4 and 12.3 of
the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Westfield America Limited Partnership, dated as of August 3, 1998, as amended (as so amended, the
"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise defined herein, shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 


    WHEREAS,
pursuant to Sections 7.1 and 12.3 of the Agreement, the Managing General Partner is authorized to determine the designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights, powers and duties of additional Partnership Units and to amend the Agreement, and the Managing General Partner is hereby creating the Partnership Preferred Units with
the designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions as set forth on Exhibit Q attached hereto. 


    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows: 



    1.  The
Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of a new exhibit, entitled "Exhibit Q" in the form attached hereto, which shall be attached to and made a part of
the Agreement. 


    2.  Except
as specifically amended hereby, the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and continue in full force and
effect and, except as amended
hereby, all of the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 


    3.  This
Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of
law. 






 

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above. 



	 	 	WESTFIELD AMERICA, INC.,

Managing General Partner
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ IRV HEPNER   
 Name: Irv Hepner

Title: Secretary
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

ALL LIMITED PARTNERS
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

Westfield America, Inc., as attorney-in-fact pursuant to the power of attorney granted under Section 2.4 of the Agreement.
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ IRV HEPNER   
 Name: Irv Hepner

Title: Secretary




2









QuickLinks


EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF WESTFIELD AMERICA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SEP 2 2 2016 

U.S.DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION HEAF-liNG DOCKET 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NOS. 2012NM060025; 2011NM06005; 2011NM060073; 2011NM060072; 

2011NM060047; 2011NM060063; 2011NM060038; 2011NM060081; 2011NM060095; 

2012NM060014 

FDMS NOS. FAA-2013-0292; FAA 2012-0777; FAA-2012-0868; FAA-2012-0869; FAA-2012-

0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-2012-0874; FAA-2012-0904; FAA-2013-0617; FAA-2013-0619 

COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S FIFTH JOINT MOTION TO HOLD DECISIONS IN 

ABEYANCE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 

Complainant and Respondent file this fifth joint motion to hold the decisions in the abovereferenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome of settlement negotiations between the parties. 

I. On or about March 30, 2016, Representatives for Complainant and Respondent 

initiated global settlement discussions applicable to twenty-eight open SkyWest enforcement cases, 

inclusive of those currently pending on appeal before the Administrator. 

2. Because these global settlement discussions have the potential to result in settlement 

of the above-referenced cases, on April 7, 2016, Complainant and Respondent filed a joint motion to 

hold the decisions in these cases in abeyance. 

3. On April 8, 2016, Anthony N. Palladino, Director and Administrative Judge, granted 

the parties' motion and held the decisions in abeyance for 30 calendar days. 

4. On May 9, 2016, Anthony N. Palladino, Director and Administrative Judge, granted 

the parties' second joint motion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additiona130 calendar 

days. 
5. On June 10, 2016, John A. Dietrich, Acting Director and Administrative Judge, 

granted the parties' third joint motion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additional30 

calendar days. 

6. On July 26, 2016, John A. Dietrich, Director and Administrative Judge, granted the 

parties' fourth joint motion and held the decisions in abeyance for an additional30 calendar days. 

7. The parties are diligently pursuing settlement of these cases and the nature of these 

discussions is continuing and ongoing. 

WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent respectfully request the Administrator 

continue to hold any decisions in the above-referenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome of 

these settlement negotiations and a fULther motion by the parties. 

Dated: September 22, 2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

~~;,, Enforcement Division, ~m~ AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

~ 

Todd Emerson, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Sky West Airlines 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

l hereby ce11ify that l served by personal delivery, the original and one copy of the foregoing 

Complainant's Request for an Extension of Time in the matter of Sky West, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA2013-0292, et. a!., addressed to: 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W I 00 

Washington, D.C., 20591
# Events

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 

# Filter Events by:

### Wisconsin State Technical Committee Meeting - April 2024

The Natural Resources Conservation Service in Wisconsin will host a hybrid (in-person with Microsoft Teams video conference option) State Technical Committee Meeting on Thursday April 18, 2024 at the USDA-NRCS State Office in Madison, Wisconsin.

WisconsinAirAnimalsClimateEnergyLandPlantsSoilWaterWildlife HabitatCroplandsEasementsForestryInsects and PollinatorsOrganic AgricultureRange & PastureSoil HealthTreesUrban AgricultureWetlandsWildlifeConservation Stewardship ProgramEnvironmental Quality Incentives ProgramRegional Conservation Partnership Program
# C_2004251EN.01001202.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/12

---

Election of the Presidents of Chambers

(2004/C 251/22)

On 10 and 13 September 2004 the Court of First Instance, in accordance with Article 15 of its Rules of Procedure, elected Judge Jaeger, Judge Pirrung, Judge Vilaras and Judge Legal as Presidents of the Chambers composed of five Judges for the period from 10 September 2004 to 31 August 2007 and Judge Jaeger, Judge Pirrung, Judge Vilaras, Judge Legal and Judge Cooke as Presidents of the Chambers composed of three Judges for the period from 13 September 2004 to 30 September 2005.

---
*February 7, 1939.*

#### Angelski, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Padway, Goldberg & Tarrell*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent city of Milwaukee: *Walter J. Mattison,*city attorney, *Chas. W. Babcock,*first assistant city attorney, and *Cornelius J. Merten,*assistant city attorney.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004262EN.01003802.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/38

---

Action brought on 21 July 2004 by EFKON AG against the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union

(Case T-298/04)

(2004/C 262/73)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 July 2004 by EFKON AG, Graz-Andritz (Austria), represented by Georg Zanger, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004; (1)

1

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 2(1)(a), (b) and (c) and Articles 3 and 6 of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 2(1)(a), (b) and (c) and Articles 3 and 6 of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004;

| — | in the alternative, allow the technology used by the applicant (active infra-red) in the introduction of electronic road toll systems; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, allow the technology used by the applicant (active infra-red) in the introduction of electronic road toll systems;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant seeks the annulment of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, arguing that, contrary to the requirement that legal measures be technologically neutral, it mandatorily prescribes specific technologies and thereby creates a market regime in favour of the technologies specified in the directive, infringing the principle of competition in the Community. The applicant complains that, with its technology (bi-directional high-speed active infra-red communication technology), it is excluded from the market for road toll systems.

The applicant further argues that the directive does not achieve its purpose, namely inter-operability between electronic road toll systems in the Member States, and at the same time hinders cooperation between the Member States, constituting an infringement of the subsidiarity principle. The applicant was not able to participate in the law-making process, thereby infringing its right to a fair hearing, and was discriminated against by the legal measure in relation to the microwave industry. The market regime created by the European legislature adversely affects the applicant in the exercise of its basic freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty.

---

(1)  Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 19, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (“HSA Foundation”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TAIWAN, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HSA Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 31, 2012, HSA Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2012 (77 FR 61786).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 29, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 22, 2014 (79 FR 63169).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-02460 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P