alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/05/2010 14:0 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S DUJDRKI N AN D ASSOC @|002/00 4 PAG E 02/0 4 

### D::F TO r T^- ; • •"FCRlAllO N

UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C .
I N TH E MATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . FA A Docke t

No . CP],ONM000 2 (Civi l Penalt y ActioTi

) DM S No . FA A 2010-031 2 Judge : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n
NOTIC E O FTAKIN G DEPOSITIO N

O F JEFFRE Y M . REYNOLD S

T O AL L PARTIE S HEREI N AN D T O THEI RATTORNEYS ; Pursuan t t o Title 1 4 CFRSectio n 13.22 0 , SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC , b y an dthroug h it s undersigne dcounsel , wil l take th e deposition , o n oral examination , o f FA A Aviatio n Safet

y Inspecto r JEFFRE Y M . REYNOLD S o n Thursday , Jun e 17 , 2010 , commencin g a t 9:3 0 AM , a t Barkley Court

Reporters , Golde n Eagl e Plaza , 52 5 B Street , Suit e 1500 , San Diego , Californi a 9210 1 (Telephone : 1-858-455-5444)
. Th e depositio n wil l b e take n befor e aqualifie dNotary Publi c an dcontinue dfro mda y t o day thereafter , Sunday s an dholiday s excepted , a t th e same place , utJti l completed , o n behal f o f SKYWES T AIRLINES, INC .05/05/201 0 14:0 8 FA X 202493514 2 J-O . J O '*J-^<*^ljlZlb O FA A* DM S

DWORkI NAN

D ASSO C 0003/00 4 PAG E 03/0 4
Dated : Ma y 5,201 0 ivflCHAE L L . DWORKIN

T an dASSOCL\TE S 46 5 Californi aStreet , Suite 21 0 Sa n Francisco , Califonii a9410 4 ^ Telephone : 415-421-25 W FAX ; 415-421-256 0 Emajl r / . ]awrS>avial^^^H S

)RKI N Attorne y for

SKYWES T AIRLINES, INC .05/05/201 0 14:0 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A* DM S gl004/00 4 05/05/201 0 10:5 5 415421256 0 DWORKI NAN D ASSO C PA6 E 04/0 4

CERTEFTCAr E O FSERVIC E (4 9 C.F.E

_§821.8 ; 1 4 C.F. R§13.211 ) I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s da

y serve dth e followin g document : NOTIC E O FTAKIN G DEPOSITIO N O FJEFFRE Y M . REYNOLD S

(Sk y Wes t Airlines , FA A Cas e No . 2009NM060048 ) vi aFA X an dFEDE X 2-day econom y delivery , t o th e person s an da t th e addresse s indicate d below ; Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suit e 2W100 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W , Washington , D.C , 2059 1 FAX ; 1-202-493-514 2 (Execute dOrigina l plu s on e cop y vi aFEDEX ; on e cop y vi aFAX ) Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin. , Administrativ e Law Judg e Adnainistrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-50 , 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S,E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-23 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 FAX : 1-202-366-753 6 (On e cop y eac h vi aFA X an dFEDEX ) Scott RMorris , Esq . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Of&ce o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ANM- 7 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , WA 9805 7 FAX : 1-227-100 7 (On e cop y eac h vi aFA X an dFEDEX ) Execute dthi s 5 * day o f

May , 201 0 a t

Sa n Francisco , California
.

JoIene<! r Brow n Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>                       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                               FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART
                               OF 360 COMMUNICATIONS' SECOND QUARTER 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0001003959
<NAME>                         360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,235
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              121,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,927
<INVENTORY>                                 25,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           247,731
<PP&E>                                   1,832,269
<DEPRECIATION>                             646,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,973,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      289,701
<BONDS>                                  1,823,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     1,233
<OTHER-SE>                                 595,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,973,474
<SALES>                                     26,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           753,448
<CGS>                                       53,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           135,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            15,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          66,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            149,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                68,444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         81,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                81,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.67
        

</TABLE>
# **Exhibit 31.1**

# ** **

# **Officer’sCertification**

# ** **

I, Preston A. Miller, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicingreports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annualreport, of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2001-A;

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under thesale and servicing agreement is included in these reports;

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale andservicing agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

 
| Date:                                  | April 21, 2004        |   |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                   | /s/ Preston A. Miller |   |
| Preston  A. Miller                     |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                                        |                       |        |  |  |

 

----
# C_2004179EN.01002001.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/20

---

(2004/C 179/37)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 168, 26.6.2004

OJ C 168, 26.6.2004

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 156, 12.6.2004

OJ C 146, 29.5.2004

OJ C 106, 30.4.2004

OJ C 94, 17.4.2004

OJ C 85, 3.4.2004

OJ C 71, 20.3.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
# C_2004190EN.01001901.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/19

---

Action brought on 17 May 2004 by Daniel Surget against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-171/04)

(2004/C 190/31)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 May 2004 by Daniel Surget, residing in Cherbourg (France), represented by Jean-François Péricaud, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the Council and the Commission jointly and severally to pay the sum of EUR 909 428, or in the alternative EUR 740 190, with interest in either case at the legal rate from the date this action was brought, by way of damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council and the Commission jointly and severally to pay the sum of EUR 909 428, or in the alternative EUR 740 190, with interest in either case at the legal rate from the date this action was brought, by way of damages;

| — | order the Council and the Commission to bear the costs jointly and severally. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council and the Commission to bear the costs jointly and severally.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law and principal arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-440/03 Arizmendi and Others v Council and Commission (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6. 3. 2004, p. 31.

1

---
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 21 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide 

for en bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval 

for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 21 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Midnight Rules Relief 

3 Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EN BLOC CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF 

5 DISAPPROVAL PERTAINING TO ‘‘MIDNIGHT 

6 RULES’’. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 801(d) of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(4) In applying section 802 to rules described under 

11 paragraph (1), a joint resolution of disapproval may con12 tain one or more such rules if the report under subsection 

13 (a)(1)(A) for each such rule was submitted during the 

14 final year of a President’s term.’’. 

15 (b) TEXT OF RESOLVING CLAUSE.—Section 802(a) 

16 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

17 (1) by inserting after ‘‘resolving clause of which 

18 is’’ the following: ‘‘(except as otherwise provided in 

19 this subsection)’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In the 

21 case of a joint resolution under section 801(d)(4), 

22 the matter after the resolving clause of such resolu23 tion shall be as follows: ‘That Congress disapproves 

24 the following rules: the rule submitted by the ll 

25 relating to ll; and the rule submitted by the ll 

26 relating to ll. Such rules shall have no force or 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 21 RFS

1 effect.’ (The blank spaces being appropriately filled 

2 in and additional clauses describing additional rules 

3 to be included as necessary)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18


U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-


OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,




1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By
/s/ Arthur L. SmithArthur L. SmithPresident andChief Executive OfficerJuly 30, 2014
Response

Robert l-Jackman

ATA Craig Fabian

Aircrafl O""nel"S & Pilots Association

tA.A- ~0I 0 - 0477

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

I

Organization PersonContacted IOate

National Business Aircraft Association Eli CoW 11 V

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer I
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         February 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 108 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-27, CP2015-36.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-02353 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 6, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01010-CR

JOHN ALBERT ESTRADA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F93-26578-PJ

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

John Albert Estrada was convicted, following the adjudication of his guilt, for aggravated 

sexual assault of a child. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. 

This Court affirmed appellant’s conviction on direct appeal. Estrada v. State, No. 05-96-00752-

CR, 1999 WL 521793 (Tex. App.––Dallas July 23, 1999, pet. ref’d, untimely filed) (op. on 

reh’g). Appellant filed in the trial court a pro se “Motion for the Court to Call the Substantiation 

of Guilt Judgment of May 16 1994 “Void” For Failure of the Court to Follow Statutory Mandate 

Art. 1.15 V.C.C.P. and Calling the Adjudication of Guilt on 1 March 1996 “Void” for Failure of 

the Court to Follow Statutory Mandate Art. 1.15 V.C.C.P. and for not having Subject Matter 

Jurisdiction or Jurisdiction to Enter Judgment Against the Undersign[ed] Juan Alberto Estrada.” 

The trial court denied the motion and appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We conclude we 

lack jurisdiction over the appeal.
–2–

“Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case.” Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an appellate court must be 

legally invoked, and, if not, the power of the court to act is as absent as if did not exist. See id. at 

523. An appellate court may consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only after conviction or 

the entry of an appealable order. See Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.––Dallas 

1998, no pet.). An order denying a motion to declare an eighteen-year-old conviction void is not 

an appealable order. See id. (identifying types of appealable orders).

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

141010F.U05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOHN ALBERT ESTRADA, Appellant

No. 05-14-01010-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F93-26578-PJ.

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, 

Justices Evans and Lewis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 6th day of August, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1850 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1850

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, as the ``Donna Sauers Besko 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DONNA SAUERS BESKO POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Donna Sauers Besko Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Donna 
Sauers Besko Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6607

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT EARL WARREN, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-100; 1:04-cv-01144-WLO) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Earl Warren, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Earl Warren, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend and accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Warren has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in formal pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        17311662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                147099735
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2091266
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3397468
<PP&E>                                         5618829
<DEPRECIATION>                                  259295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               290977637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        241118358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1620000
<OTHER-SE>                                    47457754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 290977637
<SALES>                                        3033919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4669910
<CGS>                                          1439279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3230631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1361039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3221961
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2139648
<INCOME-TAX>                                    737614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1402034
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87


</TABLE>