alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
 OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending July 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,



| | 1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By | /s/
    Arthur L. Smith     | 
|-- | --------------------------- | 
|   | Arthur
    L. Smith         | 
|   | President
    and           | 
|   | Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|   | November
    16, 2018       |
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Staff Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors (NUREG-1628)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1628 (PDF - 5.67 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2000**Date Published:**June 2000

**Prepared by:** John L Minns and Michael T. Masnik, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rebekah Harty and Eva Eckert Hickey, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report, through a question-and-answer format, provides U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff responses to frequently asked questions on the decommissioning process for commercial, nuclear power reactors. The questions were taken from a variety of sources over the past several years, including written inquiries to the NRC and questions asked at public meetings and during informal discussions with the NRC staff. In responding to the questions, the NRC staff attempted to provided the answers in a clear and non-technical form.

With the increase in the number of power reactors beginning the decommissioning process and significant changes that occurred in the regulations since 1996, the staff realized that there was a general lack of understanding of the decommissioning process and the risks associated with decommissioning. This document was developed in response to the staff's concerns. The report contains a definition of decommissioning and a discussion of alternatives. It also provides a focus on decommissioning experiences in the United States and how the NRC regulates the decommissioning process. Questions related to spent fuel, low-level waste, and transportation related to decommissioning are answered. Questions related to license termination, the ultimate disposition of the facility, and finances for completing decommissioning and hazards associated with decommissioning are also addressed. This document also provides responses to questions related to public involvement in decommissioning as well as providing the public with sources of obtaining additional information on decommissioning.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Irradiation-Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking of Austenitic Stainless Steels in BWR Environments (NUREG/CR-7018)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7018 (PDF - 3.92 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2009**Date Published:** June 2010

**Prepared by:** Y. Chen, O.K. Chopra, E.E. Gruber and W.J. Shack

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

A.S. Rao, NRC Project Manager

 NRC Job Code N6519

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The internal components of light water reactors are exposed to high-energy neutron irradiation and high-temperature reactor coolant. The exposure to neutron irradiation increases the susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels (SSs) to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) because of the elevated corrosion potential of the reactor coolant and the introduction of new embrittlement mechanisms through radiation damage. Various nonsensitized SSs and nickel alloys have been found to be prone to intergranular cracking after extended neutron exposure. Such cracks have been seen in a number of internal components in boiling water reactors (BWRs). The elevated susceptibility to SCC in irradiated materials, commonly referred to as irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC), is a complex phenomenon that involves simultaneous actions of irradiation, stress, and corrosion. In recent years, as nuclear power plants have aged and irradiation dose increased, IASCC has become an increasingly important issue. Post-irradiation crack growth rate and fracture toughness tests have been performed to provide data and technical support for the NRC to address various issues related to aging degradation of reactor-core internal structures and components. This report summarizes the results of the last group of tests on compact tension specimens from the Halden-II irradiation. The IASCC susceptibility of austenitic SSs and heat-affected-zone (HAZ) materials sectioned from submerged arc and shielded metal arc welds was evaluated by conducting crack growth rate and fracture toughness tests in a simulated BWR environment. The fracture and cracking behavior of HAZ materials, thermally sensitized SSs and grain-boundary engineered SSs was investigated at several doses (≤3 dpa). These latest results were combined with previous results from Halden-I and II irradiations to analyze the effects of neutron dose, water chemistry, alloy compositions, and welding and processing conditions on IASCC. The effect of neutron irradiation on the fracture toughness of austenitic SSs was also evaluated at dose levels relevant to BWR internals.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                       110
<INVENTORY>                                        343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,254
<PP&E>                                           1,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                     260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,488
<SALES>                                         11,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,208
<CGS>                                            7,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (323)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (115)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (174)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                    EXHIBIT 10.11.3

DATE:           February 27, 2003

FROM:           Charlie Eitel

SUBJECT:        2003 Management Bonus Plan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am pleased to announce several changes to the Management Bonus Plan criteria
for 2003. As in 2002, payouts will be based on EBITDA and sales objectives. By
measuring performance against these criteria, plan participants can be
recognized and rewarded for a more direct impact on company results.

Below is an outline of the bonus criteria for the various plan participants,
both at corporate and at the plants:

CORPORATE AND SITE
-    20% Corporate Adjusted Gross Sales (including Gallery) Objective
-    80% Corporate EBITDA Objective

PLANTS
-    15% Plant Sales Objective
-    45% Plant PPV/OI Objective
-    40% Corporate EBITDA Objective

NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
-    15% National Account Sales Objective
-    45% National Account Dealer Contribution
-    40% Corporate EBITDA Objective

TO BE ELIGIBLE, THE COMPANY MUST HIT:
-    91% of EBITDA Objective and
-    91% of all categories totaled

IN ORDER TO PAY IN EXCESS OF 100% IN ANY CATEGORY:
-    The company must hit EBITDA Objective
-    For the plants, they must hit 100% of the PPV/OI Objective
-    For National Accounts, they must hit 100% of the Dealer Contribution
     Objective








<PAGE>


The percentage of bonus each participant will receive at each threshold is
indicated below for EBITDA at the target:


At 90% performance level (or below)       0% Bonus
At 91% performance level                 10% Bonus
At 92% performance level                 20% Bonus
At 93% performance level                 30% Bonus
At 94% performance level                 40% Bonus
At 95% performance level                 50% Bonus
At 96% performance level                 60% Bonus
At 97% performance level                 70% Bonus
At 98% performance level                 80% Bonus
At 99% performance level                 90% Bonus
At 100% performance level               100% Bonus
Over 100% performance level               1% of salary for each additional 1%
                                             performance above 100%

The percentage of bonus for adjusted gross sales will be prorated from 0 to 100%
for adjusted gross sales between 2002 actual sales and the 2003 Sales Objective.

If an associate is placed on a "Plan" during the year, the bonus will be
prorated to exclude the length of the Probationary Plan. Earning a bonus is
contingent on an associate receiving at least a "Meets Expectations" performance
rating at the annual performance appraisal and being an active associate at the
time bonuses are distributed. Associates whose employment began after January 1,
2003 will be prorated for the year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., February 10, 2015.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        It was determined by a unanimous vote of the Commissioners that the Commission consider and act upon the following in closed session:                         *Brody Mining, LLC*                         v.                         *Secretary of Labor,*                         Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-82-R, et al. (Issues include whether to grant or deny the Secretary of Labor's Emergency Motion for Stay of ALJ's Order Dismissing Pattern-of-Violations Notice.) A certification regarding the closure of the meeting will be placed on the Commission's Web site (                        *www.fmshrc.gov*). Commission employees shall not attend this meeting unless they have been assigned to work on this case with Commissioners.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-02076 Filed 1-29-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
# C_2004251EN.01002202.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/22

---

Action brought on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

(Case T-263/04)

(2004/C 251/41)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A., established in Clichy (France), represented by Michel-Paul Escande, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2004 (Case R 468/2003-4), (1) in so far as it decided that Community trade mark application No 1 738 566 should be refused on the grounds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation No 40/94, since BIC has shown that the conditions for the application of that article were not satisfied in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2004 (Case R 468/2003-4), (1) in so far as it decided that Community trade mark application No 1 738 566 should be refused on the grounds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation No 40/94, since BIC has shown that the conditions for the application of that article were not satisfied in the present case;

1

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark applied for: | Three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a lighter. |
| --- | --- |
| Goods or services: | Goods in Class 34 (smoker's articles, lighters) — application No 1 738 566. |
| Decision contested before the Board of Appeal: | Refusal to register by the examiner. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed. |
| Pleas in law: | The applicant has shown that the shape of the lighter in respect of which the application for registration as a Community trade mark was made is widely recognised by consumers as belonging to it.
  The applicant has established that the shape of the BIC lighter had acquired a distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. |

Community trade mark applied for:

Three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a lighter.

Goods or services:

Goods in Class 34 (smoker's articles, lighters) — application No 1 738 566.

Decision contested before the Board of Appeal:

Refusal to register by the examiner.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law:

The applicant has shown that the shape of the lighter in respect of which the application for registration as a Community trade mark was made is widely recognised by consumers as belonging to it.

The applicant has established that the shape of the BIC lighter had acquired a distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

---

(1)  Probably R 469/2003-4.

1

---
#### Kiedrowski, Respondent, vs. White and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Wilbershide, Baumblatt & Storms*of Racine.

For the respondent: *Beck, Smith ■& Heft*of Racine.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Congregation of the Town of Milwaukee, Respondent, vs. Koehn, Appellant.

For the appellant: *W. J. Kershaw*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Ernst von Briesen*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004168EN.01000302.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/3

---

Action brought on 30 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-197/04)

(2004/C 168/06)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 30 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Gross, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by applying the tax rate for fine-cut tobacco for self-rolled cigarettes to rolls of tobacco sold under the name ‘West Single Packs’, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 95/59/EC (1) on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco and under the first paragraph of Article 2 of Council Directive 92/79/EEC (2) of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of taxes on cigarettes; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by applying the tax rate for fine-cut tobacco for self-rolled cigarettes to rolls of tobacco sold under the name ‘West Single Packs’, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 95/59/EC (1) on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco and under the first paragraph of Article 2 of Council Directive 92/79/EEC (2) of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of taxes on cigarettes;

1

2

| 2. | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the Commission's view, the rolls of tobacco sold on the German market under the name ‘West Single Packs’, which consumers can wrap in a separately sold cigarette paper with a filter by simple non-industrial handling, are cigarettes within the meaning of Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 95/59/EG and, accordingly, must be taxed as such.

The German provisions applying the tax rate for fine-cut tobacco for self-rolled cigarettes to ‘West Single Packs’ thus infringe Article 4(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC and the first paragraph of Article 2 of Council Directive 92/79/EEC.

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 291, p. 40.

1

(2)  OJ 1992 L 316, p. 8.

2

---
# C_2004313EN.01001101.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/11

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG EAC No 91/04

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Actions to preserve and commemorate the main sites and archives associated with the deportations

(2004/C 313/09)

1.   Objectives and description

The Annex I – Part 3 of the Decision 792/2004/EC (1) establishes a Community Programme to support actions to preserve and commemorate the main sites and archives associated with the deportations, symbolised by the memorials which have been raised on the sites of the former camps and other places of mass-civilian martyrdom and extermination, and to keep alive the memory of victims at these sites.

1

2.   Eligible candidates

Eligible candidates are non-profit-making bodies and a non-governmental bodies, with legal status, active in the field of culture, with an objective aimed at public good and in particular in the field defined in point 1.

These organisations have to be based in one of the 25 Member States of the European Union as of 1 May 2004.

3.   Budget and length of projects

The total available budget for 2005 is EUR 800 000. The Funding requested for projects must range from EUR 10 000 to EUR 40 000 and may not exceed 75 % of the project's total eligible budget.

The project must begin on 1 July 2005 at the latest and must finish by 30 June 2006.

4.   Deadlines for submission of applications

28 February 2005.

5.   Additional information

The specifications and the application forms are available on the Commission's internet site:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/index_en.html

Applications for funding must respect the conditions set out in the specifications and must be submitted on the forms provided with the specifications.

---

(1)  Decision 792/2004/EC establishes a Community Action Programme to promote bodies active at European level in the field of culture.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    The Form 10-K of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the period ended December
31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
  By:
    
    /s/ Weston M. Andress

Weston M. AndressPresident and Chief Financial Officer of ColonialProperties Trust, the general partner of ColonialRealty Limited Partnership