alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Precision Drilling Corporation on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Precision Drilling Corporation, hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Precision Drilling Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                                            |  | 
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: |  | March 13, 2015                                                             |  | 
|       |  |                                                                           
|By:    |  | /s/ Robert McNally                                                         |  | 
|       |  | Robert J. McNally, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of |  | 
|       |  | Precision Drilling Corporation                                             |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report (the
"Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2012,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. Vice President of Finance
& Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By	          /s/ Antonio Estrada Jr.

Antonio Estrada Jr.

Sr. Vice President
of Finance & Corporate Controller and

Principal Financial
Officer

November 13, 2012
# C_2005019EN.01002102.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 November 2004

in Joined Cases T-285/02 and T-395/02 Eva Vega Rodríguez v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Open competition - Multiple-choice questions - Accuracy of the answers in the marking sheet - Judicial scrutiny - Limits)

(2005/C 19/46)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-285/02 and T-395/02, Eva Vega Rodríguez, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented in Case T-285/02 by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and, in Case T-395/02, by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – applications, primarily, for annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition COM/A/10/01 excluding the applicant and awarding an insufficient number of marks for her to continue in the competition and of the decision rejecting her complaint and, in the alternative, for damages – the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John A. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Roberts                  
|John A. Roberts                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|May 13, 2005
EXHIBIT 12.1 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Jean-Paul Ouellette, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vision Global SolutionsInc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thecompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. 

4. The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date; 

5. The company's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the company's auditors andthe audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the company'sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company's internal controls; and

6. The company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequentto the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

Date: October 14, 2003                                    /s/ Jean-Paul Ouellette                                                                                                                    Jean-Paul Ouellette                                                                                 Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,871
<PP&E>                                       1,239,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,635
<BONDS>                                        477,566
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                     672,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,284,004
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,447
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41


</TABLE>
# C_2004274EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 November 2004

(2004/C 274/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2917 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69695 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0886 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5286 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,24 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,191 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5769 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,421 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6789 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4315 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2574 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 669 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,78 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 880 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7031 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,544 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0447 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8595 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,135 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 427,72 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9915 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2917

JPY

Japanese yen

136,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69695

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0886

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5286

ISK

Iceland króna

87,24

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,191

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5769

CZK

Czech koruna

31,421

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6789

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4315

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2574

ROL

Romanian leu

40 669

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,78

TRL

Turkish lira

1 880 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7031

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,544

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0447

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8595

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,135

KRW

South Korean won

1 427,72

ZAR

South African rand

7,9915

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Argued and submitted July 30,

award of attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed October 10, 1990

#### Charles E. THOMPSON, dba Dardanelle Trailer Park, *Respondent, v.*Allyson E. LONG, *Appellant.*

(89-1372-L; CA A63655)

798 P2d 729

Doug S. Gard, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Center for Nonprofit Legal Services, Inc., Medford.

Steven P. Pickens, Medford, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*645PER CURIAM

In this FED action, the trial court entered a judgment for plaintiff and granted his request for reasonable attorney fees. Defendant appeals and argues that the award of attorney fees was error. We vacate the award.

A party claiming attorney fees must serve “a verified and detailed statement of the amount of attorney fees[.]” ORCP 68C(4)(a)(i). “Detailed” means “marked by abundant detail or by thoroughness in treating small items or parts.” *Parker v. Scharbach,*75 Or App 530, 707 P2d 85 (1985). The affidavit in support of the fees provides:

> “That my hourly fee for this type of matter is $100. That I have spent a total of eight (8) hours investigating, researching, preparing and filing the Complaint, filing the Amended Complaint, preparing for trial, and trial. That the sum of $800 is a reasonable fee for the work done herein.”

Defendant argues that the affidavit is insufficient to support the award. We agree. The affidavit does not constitute the detailed statement required by the rule. It fails to itemize the time devoted to the services rendered and does not assist the court in determining if those services were reasonable. As we stated in *State v. Grandy,*52 Or App 15, 19, 627 P2d 895 (1981):

> “A mere summation in totaling of hours spent on a case will not suffice to support a petition for attorney fees.”

Award of attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed.
# C_2004217EN.01000301.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 24 June 2004

in Case C-269/02: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to implement Directive 98/24/EC within the prescribed period - Protection of the health and safety of workers - Risks linked to chemical agents at work)

(2004/C 217/04)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-269/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: D. Martin) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and C. Lemaire, assisted by C. Bergeot-Nunes) — application for a declaration that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) or, in any event, by not giving notice of those measures to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, acting as President of the Third Chamber, R. Schintgen and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 24 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 219 of 14.9.2002.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the 2003 Nuclear Safety Research Conference: Held at Marriott Hotel at Metro Center Washington, DC October 20-22, 2003 (NUREG/CP-0185)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0185 (PDF - 20.67 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2004**Date Published:**June 2004

**Compiled by:** S. Monteleone, Meeting Coordinator

**Proceedings prepared by:** Brookhaven National Laboratory

S. Nesmith, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains papers presented at the 2003 Nuclear Safety Research Conference at the Marriott Hotel at Metro Center in Washington, DC, October 20-22, 2003. The papers were presented in each of the conference's technical sessions and at poster sessions over the course of the three days. They describe progress and results of programs in nuclear safety research conducted in this country and abroad. International participation in the meeting included papers presented by researchers from France, Germany, Japan, Norway, Russia and Spain.

The titles of the papers and the names of the authors have been updated and may differ from those that appeared in the final program of the meeting.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

t0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

151697 (14)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151697

COA: 325695

Wayne CC: 03

- 009642

- FC

JAMAL LATAZ KING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 29,

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02286]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1014, 1016, and 1017 (Second Review)]

Polyvinyl Alcohol From China, Japan, and Korea: Revised Schedule 
for Full Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective November 13, 2014, the Commission 
established a schedule for the conduct of the subject full five-year 
reviews (79 FR 69127, November 20, 2014). The Commission is revising 
its schedule.
    The Commission's new schedule for the reviews is as follows: 
Requests to appear at the hearing must be filed with the Secretary to 
the Commission not later than March 4, 2015; the prehearing conference, 
if needed, will be held on March 5, 2015; the deadline for filing 
prehearing briefs is March 3, 2015; the hearing will be held at the 
U.S. International Trade Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on March 10, 
2015; the deadline for filing posthearing briefs is March 18, 2015; the 
Commission will make its final release of information on April 21, 
2015; and final party comments are due on April 23, 2015.
    For further information concerning these reviews see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority:  These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 2, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-02286 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```