alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsReview of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accid

# Review of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents" (NUREG/CR-6953, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6953, Volume 1 (PDF - 9.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2007**Date Published:** December 2007

**Prepared by:** J.A. Jones1, N. Bixler1, and F.J. Schelling1 R. Sullivan2

1Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87185

R. Sullivan, NRC Technical Lead

NRC Job Code R3137

**Prepared for:**2Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Protective Action Recommendations (PAR) project provides an evaluation of alternative protective actions that could potentially reduce consequences during a severe radiological emergency at a nuclear power plant. The study included an assessment of alternative protective actions within a range of evacuation times and calculated public health consequences for these alternative protective actions. PARs identified in this report will aid in the determination of whether improvements or changes to the Federal guidance contained in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Supplement 3 (NRC, 1996) would be beneficial. Early and staged evacuations provide alternative protective actions that have the effect of moving the public away from the source term in an expeditious manner. Many off-site response organizations already institute some level of early protective actions at a Site Area Emergency such as the movement of school children. Expanding on this concept with staged evacuations may reduce potential consequences and may better protect public health and safety under specific conditions. The effectiveness of the protective action strategy is sensitive to both initial release timing and the evacuation time, and therefore, it is important to reduce the uncertainties associated with each of these parameters. Volume I of this NUREG / CR provides the technical analyses of alternative protective actions. Volume II of this NUREG / CR will include a detailed assessment of the anticipated public response.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT In
connection with the annual report of New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Parris H. Holmes,
Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that: (1)
  The Form
  10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2004, fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and(2)
  The
  information contained in the Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31,
  2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings Corp.  By:
  /s/
  PARRIS H. HOLMES, JR.
  
  Date:  March
  29, 2004Parris H.
  Holmes, Jr.
  Chairman of the Board of Directors and
  Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

RWCI management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all
material information required to be filed in this report has been made known to
them in a timely fashion. There have been no significant changes in internal
controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls,
subsequent to the date the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
completed their evaluation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7375
WILLIAM THOMAS EALEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES HAWLEY; THOMAS BREEDLOVE; JANE DOE; JOHN KEKU, Doctor; DOCTOR LITES; DOCTOR BALOCH; DOCTOR SMITH; DOCTOR DANIELS; JOHN DOE; DOCTOR DAVENPORT; MS. KELLY; DOCTOR SHAH; V. L. EVANS; PERCY DAVIS; MR. BATTEN; LYNN PHILLIPS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-490-CT-H) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ealey v. Hawley , No. CA-95-490-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SMITH & SHUFORD *vs.*E. CUNNINGHAM.

Where there is a joint judgment against two defendants in the Court be. low and one only appeals, the appeal will be dismissed on motion, no matter what steps have been taken in the cause after the filing of the appeal.

The cases of *Dunns*v. Jones, 4. Dev. & Bat. 154, and *Stiner*v. *Caw-thorn,*4. Dev, & Bat, 501 cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Buncombe County, at the Spring Term 1848, his Honer Judge Battle, presiding.

This action is brought in assumpsit and commenced by warrant, before a single magistrate against the defendant and one Henderson.

Judgment was rendered by the magistrate against both the defendants, and Cunningham appealed to the County Court, from which the case was transferred under the Act of Assembly to the Superior Court. In the latter court the case was continued for several Terms, without any motion being made in it, on either side, though it appeared that the parties had summoned witnesses, at Spring Term 1848. The plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal, because it was taken by one of the defendants only. This motion was resisted upon the ground that the plaintiffs had waived the objection by their delay and by summoning witnesses in preparation *461for a trial. The court sustained the motion and ordered a writ, of *procedendo*to issue. From which judgment the defendant appealed to this Court.

*Baxter,*for the plaintiff.

*N. W. Woodfin, and J. W. Woodjin,*for the defendant.

Nash, J.

That one defendant cannot appeal from a joint Judgment has been considered as the settled law of this State, since the case of Hicks and Gilliam, 4th Dev. 217. That case has been repeatedly noticed in subsequent cases and approved. That the principle operates in many cases harshly, has been felt and admitted, but the principle is considered as sound law. The objection made by the defendant cannot avail him. It was taken in the case of *Dunns*& *Mcllvaine,*against *Jones,*4th Dev. and Bat. 154 and overruled. In’ that case the action was brought in the County Court of Franklin, against one Ward and the defendant Jones. The defendants severed in their pleas, but the Judgment was joint. Jones appealed and Ward refused to join him. At the ensuing Term of the Superior Court, to which the appeal was returned, the plaintiff obtained an order for taking a deposition, and the cause was continued. At the next Term of the Superior Court the appeal was dismissed on the motion of the plaintiff, upon the objection that it was an appeal by one defendant from a joint judgment. His Honor’s judgment was sustained by the Court. This case is recognized and approved, in the subsequent case of *Stiner*v. *Cawiliorn,*4 Dev. and Bat.. 501.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
# CA2004169EN.01001201.xml

| 29.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 169/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 169/12

---

Cancellation COM/097/04

(2004/C 169 A/05)

The vacancy for the post of Principal Advisor in DG Environment (COM/097/04), published in Official Journal C 102 A of 28 April 2004, is cancelled.

---
Exhibit 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registration dated December 11, 1997
(File No. 333-42049), Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registration dated May 26,
2000 (File No. 333-37922) and Form S-3 related to the Shelf Registration dated
May 16, 2003 (File No. 333-105329), as amended, of Colonial Realty Limited
Partnership of our report dated March 1, 2004 relating to financial statements
and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 58077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7593]

Certification Related to Conditions Under Which Assistance Using 
FY 2011 Economic Support Funds (ESF) for the Reintegration of Former 
Members of Foreign Terrorist Organizations May Be Used

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State under 
section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), as 
carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 
(Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10), which incorporates by reference and amends, 
in part, section 7046(d) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. 
L. 111-8) (FY 2009 SFOAA), I hereby determine and certify that the 
Government of Colombia is meeting the conditions described in section 
7046(d)(2) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, and that I have consulted with 
Congress as consistent with section 7046(d)(1) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, as 
amended.
    This Certification shall be published in the Federal Register and 
copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.

    Dated: September 6, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-24034 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
Order entered May 27, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00356

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.J., A CHILD On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 54891

- 2019

O RDER Appellant has filed a motion seeking review of the trial court’s order to pay costs of the appeal. We ORDER Collin County District Clerk Lynne Finley to file, on or before June 10, 2022 , a suppleme ntal clerk’s record containing: (1) appellant’s July 1, 2021 Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Costs or Appeal Bond; (2) any response to the Statement of Inability ; and (3) the trial court’s May 1 6, 2022 Order to Pay Costs. We ORDER Stephanie Hu nn, Official Court Reporter for the 469th Judicial District Court, to file, on or before June 10,
2022 , the reporter’s record of the hearing held on May 6, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 46208/46209

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DUSTIN CRAIG SWAYZE ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: March 6, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard Greenwood , District Judge.

Orders denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions for reduction of sentences, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
In these consolidated cases, Dustin Craig Swayze pled guilty to attempted trafficking in methamphetamine or amphetamine by manufacturing , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732B(a)(3), and
unlawful possession of a firearm, I.C. § 18

- 3316 (Docket No. 46208)

. The district court imposed

a unified sentence of ten years with two years determinate for the attempted trafficking charge

and a consecutive two

- year determinate term for the unlawful possession of a firearm charge

. In Docket No. 46209, Swayze pled guilty to grand theft by unauthorized control, I.C. §§ 18

- 2403(3), 18

- 2407(1), 18

- 2409. The district court imposed a unified sentence of twelve years with four years determinate and ordered the sentence to run concurrent ly with the sentences in2 Docket No. 46208. Swayze filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion s for reduction of his sentence s
in each case , which the district court denied. Swayze appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a p lea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the
record, including any new i nformation submitted with Swayze ’s Rule 35 motion s , we conclude
no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order s denying Swayze ’s

Rule 35 motions are affirmed.
*June 5, 1934.*

#### Brannum Lumber Company, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Baumblatt and another, Appellants; Kratochvil and others, Defendants and Respondents; Lappin Electric Company, Impleaded Defendant and Respondent.

For the appellants : *Wilbershide & Baumblatt*of Racine.

For the respondents: *Beck, Smith & Heft, Foley & Brach,*and *Simmons, Walker, Wratten & Sporer,*all of Racine.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                                     TO THE
                               PRACTICEWORKS, INC.
                           401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
                             EFFECTIVE MARCH 5, 2001

         WHEREAS, effective March 5, 2001, PracticeWorks, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("PracticeWorks") adopted the PracticeWorks, Inc. 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan ("Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, ss. 11.1 of the Plan reserves to PracticeWorks the right to
amend the Plan in any respect in a writing signed by the President; and

         WHEREAS, PracticeWorks desires to amend the Plan to clarify certain
provisions.

         NOW, THEREFORE, PracticeWorks hereby amends the Plan effective March 5,
2001 by amending ss. 6.1(a) to add a new sentence at the end thereof as follows:

                  "The Plan Sponsor may also permit Participants to direct the
                  investment of their 401(k) Account, Rollover Account, Profit
                  Sharing Account, Transfer Account, and after it is 100%
                  vested, Matching Account into a self-directed brokerage window
                  that allows investment in mutual funds, individual stocks and
                  bonds."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Amendment Number One has been executed this 7th day
of April, 2001.


                                             /s/ James K. Price
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             By: James K. Price
                                             Its: President
# C_2004228EN.01004501.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/45

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-423/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 228/108)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 24 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-423/03, Elisabeth Saskia SMIT v Europol.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

1

---
# C_2004217EN.01001901.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 June 2004

in Case T-275/01, Mercedes Alvarez Moreno v European Parliament (1)

1

(Officials - Auxiliary servant - Conference interpreter - Article 74 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants - End of engagement)

(2004/C 217/35)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-275/01: Mercedes Alvarez Moreno, residing in Berlin (Germany), represented by G. Vandersanden, lawyer, against European Parliament (Agents: H. von Hertzen and J. de Wachter), application, first, for annulment of the decision no longer to engage conference interpreters who have reached the age of 65 years and, second, for damages, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, and P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 June 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Parliament of 30 November 2000, notified to the applicant on 10 February 2001, and the decision of the Parliament of 19 July 2001 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Parliament of 30 November 2000, notified to the applicant on 10 February 2001, and the decision of the Parliament of 19 July 2001 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 3 of 5.1.2002.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.