alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-86,869-03

EX P ARTE JAMES LUEIS F ONTENOT , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D090817CR IN THE 260TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM ORANG E COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of burg lary of a habitation and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that TDCJ is incor r e c tl y c a lc u lating his time cre dit. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice’s Offic e of the Gene ral Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledg e of rele vant fac ts. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court e lects to hold a hea ring ,2

it shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent hi m at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. T h e r e s p o n s e s h a ll in clude Applicant’s sentenc e beg in date and his maxi mum discharg e date. The response shall also state whet h er Applicant prese nted a claim to the time cre dit resolution sy stem of the Te x as De partment of Criminal Just ice a nd, if so, the date the claim was pr esente d. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether , befor e filing this application, Applicant proper l y ex h au s t ed his administrative remedies as require d by Section 501.0081(b) of the Gover nment Code. The trial court shall then make finding s and conclusions as to whether TDCJ has corr ectly calc ulated Applicant’s time cre dit. The tr i al co u rt may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make fi ndings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclus ions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Nove mber 24, 2021 Do not publish
HomeSite Help

# Special Features

## Breadcrumbs

Breadcrumbs are the series of links at the top of each page that show you the path back to the NRC homepage. For example, you can see from the links at the top of this page that the page you are on, "Special Features," is under "Site Help," which is linked from the NRC homepage.

## Navigation Bar

The links on the left side of each page show related pages at the same level as the current page and allow you to move "sideways" to related topics. For example, you can easily move to other "Site Help" topics by selecting the links on the left side of this page.

## Explanation of Icons

**ADAMS Library File**
The ADAMS Library File icon is used as a graphical link to a document in the Agencywide Documents Access Management System (ADAMS).

**Back to the Top**

The Back to the Top icon appears on pages to provide an easy way to get back to the top of the page. Select the icon to go up to the top.

**Exit**

The Exit icon is placed directly after an external link to let you know that the link is going to take you away from the NRC site. These links are provided as a service and do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data, or products presented at these locations or guarantee the validity of the information provided. (For more information, refer to the Site Disclaimer.)

**Information Sheet**

The Information Sheet icon is used as a graphical link to information about each of the NRC Forms available in the Document Collections.

See our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for information on icons associated with document formats (e.g., PDF) used at this site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Index A-Z
          - Site Map
          - What's New On Our Site
          - Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools
          - Special Features
          - Electronic Submittals Application
          - Digital Accessibility Statement
          - Contact the NRC Webmaster
          - Privacy Policy
          - Site Disclaimer
          - For Developers

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022
#### Lawrence (Lulu), Respondent, vs. Hanley, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bagley,*Spohn, *Ross & Stevens*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Hill, Beckwith & Harrington*of Madison.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of SRI / Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge,
the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Gerald
Woodard  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Gerald Woodard         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of SRI / Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge,
the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SRI.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Mark R.
Faris                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Mark R. Faris                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

I.2. (-) Head cutting and 

channel erosion

I.6 (-) Overland and 

gully erosion

I.8 (-) Downstream 

deposition

I.7 (+) Ponding behind 

structure

I.1 (+) Channel 

stability

C.1 (+/-) Income and income 

stability (individuals and 

community)

I.9 (+) Surface 

water quality 

I.3 (+) Upstream 

sediment 

deposition

2. Decreased slope 

above structure

C.2 (+) Fishable and swimmable waters; reduced 

health and safety issues for humans, domestic, 

and wild animals.

I.11 (-) Fossil fuel use

Initial setting: Natural or 

artificial channel downcutting 

or creating gullies

D.1 (-) Water 

velocity

I.4 (+) Crop 

production

1. Structure stabilizes 

grade and controls 

erosion 

3. Sedimentation 

above structure

I.5 (+) Aquatic 

and animal 

habitat

 I.10 (-) Tillage

I.12 (-) 

Greenhouse 

gas 

emissions

C.3 (+) 

Air 

quality of 

the 

airshed

Grade Stabilization Structure (410) Start

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the resource, 

not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

Pond (378)

Critical Area Planting (342)
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Forest Farming (Code 379) 

Managing or establishing stands of trees or shrubs in

coordination with the management and/or cultivation of

understory plans or nontimber forest products. 

Practice Information 

Forest farming, also known as multi-story cropping,

requires the development and implementation of a forest

management plan that incorporates the growth,

management, and harvest of nontimber forest products

(e.g., foliage, mushrooms, berries, roots, nuts, etc.) while maintaining the option to manage existing

trees. This practice does not apply to land that is grazed. 

Conservation benefits may include but are not limited to: improved soil quality from increased organic

matter, improved wildlife habitat, increased plant and tree diversity, and improved crop diversity by

growing compatible crops on the same area. 

Common Associated Practices 

Forest Farming (379) is commonly applied with practices such as Forest Stand Improvement (666),

Tree-Shrub Establishment (612), Tree-Shrub Pruning (660), Tree-Shrub Site Preparation (490), and

Access Control (472). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
13 

. . . . -. 

--A.. 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

: AUSTIN 

-b
# C_2004159EN.01000101.xml

| 16.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2004

(2004/C 159/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0893 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5276 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,22 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1993 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9475 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5844 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,625 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6576 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4254 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6455 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 766 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,03 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,99 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 831 286 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6611 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5122 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9291 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,072 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2198

JPY

Japanese yen

133,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66475

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0893

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5276

ISK

Iceland króna

87,22

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1993

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9475

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5844

CZK

Czech koruna

31,625

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6576

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4254

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6455

ROL

Romanian leu

40 766

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,03

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,99

TRL

Turkish lira

1 831 286

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6611

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5122

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9291

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,072

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,9345

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.





Report of Independent Accountants-Uniform Single Attestation Program

To the Board of Directors of
IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries

We have  examined  the  assertion  by IMC  Mortgage  Company  and  Subsidiaries'
management about compliance with the minimum servicing  standards  identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for  Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December  31,  1996
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
IMC Mortgage Company and  Subsidiaries'  compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination. 

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,   on  a  test  basis,   evidence  about  IMC  Mortgage   Company  and
Subsidiaries'  compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards and performing
such other  procedures  as we  considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We
believe that our examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our
examination  does not provide a legal  determination on IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries' compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's   assertion  that  IMC  Mortgage   Company  and
Subsidiaries' complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended  December  31,  1996 is fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.

                                   /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
 

Tampa, Florida
February 21, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10a1

                      Amendment to the Fortune Brands, Inc.
                     Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
                     ---------------------------------------


     Section 4 of the Plan is amended by deleting the second sentence thereof
and replacing it with the following:

          "To be entitled to receive such Option with respect to any year, an
     Eligible Director must be serving as a director of Fortune immediately
     following such Annual Meeting; provided, however, that the Committee in its
     discretion may award a partial grant to an Eligible Director to reflect a
     partial year of service by an Eligible Director who is elected or appointed
     to the Board of Directors after the Annual Meeting taking place prior to
     such partial year of service, regardless of whether the partial year of
     service occurred during 2001 or a prior year."
# C_2004284EN.01002901.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/29

---

Action brought on 28 September 2004 by Habib Kachakil Amar against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-388/04)

(2004/C 284/56)

Language in which the application was submitted: Spanish

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 September 2004 by Habib Kachakil Amar, represented by Juan Carlos Heder, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the OHIM First Board of Appeal of 20 July 2004 in Case R 175/2004-1, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the OHIM First Board of Appeal of 20 July 2004 in Case R 175/2004-1, and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark consisting of a thick black longitudinal line ending in a triangle B application No 3 235 157 for products in Class 25 (Clothing, footwear, headgear, in particular sports footwear) |
| --- | --- |
| Examiner's decision: | Application rejected as falling within the absolute grounds of refusal provided for in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Application dismissed. |
| Pleas in law: | Misapplication of the abovementioned regulation and breach of the rights of the defence and of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations |

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark consisting of a thick black longitudinal line ending in a triangle B application No 3 235 157 for products in Class 25 (Clothing, footwear, headgear, in particular sports footwear)

Examiner's decision:

Application rejected as falling within the absolute grounds of refusal provided for in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Application dismissed.

Pleas in law:

Misapplication of the abovementioned regulation and breach of the rights of the defence and of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00493-CR

Jarrod Anthonie Scales, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 21-1601-K368

THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Jarrod Anthonie Scales’s appointed counsel, Jessica S. Freud, has filed a 

motion to withdraw as counsel. In her motion, counsel asserts that good cause exists for her

withdrawal because, although she has nearly completed drafting appellant’s brief, Scales has made 

certain demands “regarding the exact contents of [the brief] and the way he wishes that it be filed 

with the court, to which counsel cannot agree.”

Indigent defendants are entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal. Cooks v. 

State, 240 S.W.3d 906, 910 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The legislature, however, has given the trial

court the responsibility of appointing counsel in criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. 

art. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). When counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent 
2

defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez 

v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Vargas v. State, No. 03-16-00083-

CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6863, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 30, 2016, order) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication).

We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand 

the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, counsel is instructed to refile 

her motion to withdraw, and the trial court shall hold a hearing to determine whether to grant the 

motion. In addition, the trial court shall determine whether Scales still wishes to prosecute his 

appeal, and if so, the trial court shall make appropriate orders to ensure that appellant is adequately 

represented on appeal. See id. A record of the hearing, including copies of all findings and 

any orders, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no 

later than thirty days from the date of this opinion. See id. R. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing 

supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records).

It is so ordered on August 15, 2024.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Abated and Remanded

Filed: August 15, 2024

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 37 and 52

[FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2014-008; Correction; Docket 2014-0008; Sequence 
No. 1]
RIN 9000-AM84


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Management and Oversight of the 
Acquisition of Services; Correction

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a correction to FAR Case 2014-
008; Management and Oversight of the Acquisition of Services (Item II), 
which was published in the Federal Register at 80 FR 4992, January 29, 
2015.

DATE: Effective: March 2, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement 
Analyst, at 202-208-4949, for clarification of content. For information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory 
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-80; FAR Case 2014-
008; Correction.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In rule FR Doc. 2015-01525 published in the Federal Register at 80 
FR 4992, January 29, 2015, make the following correction:
    On page 4993, in the third column, line 22, correct ``Mar 2015'' to 
read ``(Mar 2015)''.

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 
U.S.C. 20113.

    Dated: February 3, 2015.
William Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02541 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P