alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Curtis McKINNEY, Appellant, v. J. C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.

No. 7982.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 30, 1965.

Girts Krumins, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

James R. Ward, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On December 19, 1955, McKinney was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, to serve a term of 12% years. He is now confined in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. The substance of the allegations of his petition is that he has served his sentence and is entitled to release. The petition was dismissed without a hearing.

On July 15, 1963, the United States Board of Parole released McKinney on parole. He was immediately delivered to the state authorities of North Carolina on a detainer lodged by that state with the warden of the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia. The record does not show the disposition which North Carolina made of the charges against petitioner, but sometime thereafter he was taken into custody as a parole violator. He is now confined in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, where he is serving the remainder of his sentence.

The trial court thought that the petition raised only the question of whether the petitioner was entitled to credit on his sentence for the time spent in state custody. The petition was prepared by McKinney, and giving it the liberal construction which we should, it raises the question of whether statutory and industrial good-time has been properly allowed. This can be determined only by a transcript of good-time allowances which should be furnished by the warden and a determination made by the court.

The order dismissing the petition is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Disposition of Public Comments and Technical Bases for Changes in the License Renewal Guidance Documents NUREG-1801 and NUREG-1800 (NUREG-1950)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1950 (PDF - 5.96 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:;** April 2011**Date Published:** April 2011

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document is a knowledge management and knowledge transfer document associated with Revision 2 of NUREG-1801, Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report," and Revision 2 to NUREG-1800, Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants." This document updates and combines NUREG-1832, Analysis of Public Comments on the Revised License Renewal Guidance Documents," and NUREG-1833, "Technical Bases for Revision to the License Renewal Guidance Documents," (both published in 2005) into a single document. The NRC has decided to combine these two documents because their subject matter is so closely related that there was considerable redundancy when they were two separate documents.

This document fulfills two purposes. Firstly, the technical changes that were made when revising the guidance contained in NUREG-1801 are captured in this document, along with the technical basis for the changes. Changes to NUREG-1800, many of which derive from the changes to NUREG-1801, are also discussed in this document. Consequently, this document provides the underlying rationale that the NRC used to develop the current revisions to these guidance documents.

Secondly, this document contains the NRC staff's analysis of the public comments received on the Revision 2 drafts of NUREG-1801 and NUREG-1800. Public comment drafts of the GALL Report and the Standard Review Plan for License Renewal (SRP-LR) were published on May 14, 2010, with the public comment period expiring on July 2, 2010. The disposition of comments that were accepted by the NRC staff and used as the basis for instituting a change to either the GALL Report or the SRP-LR are detailed in this document. In addition, the public comments that did not result in a change to either NUREG are also dispositioned, and a technical basis for the staff’s disagreement with these comments is presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Adaptation of USNRC's FRAPTRAN and IRSN's SCANAIR Transient Codes and Updating of MATPRO Package for Modeling of LOCA and RIA Validation Cases with Zr-1%Nb (VVER type) Cladding (NUREG/IA-0209, NSI RRC KI 3067, IRSN-2002/33)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0209 (PDF 3.24 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 2003

**Prepared by:***A. Shestopalov, K Lioutov, L. Yegorova* Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" Kurchatov Square 1, Moscow 123182, Russian Federation

**Prepared for:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (France), and Ministry of Science and Technologies of Russian Federation

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The report presents the results of analytical work on updating and supplementing Zr-1%Nb (E11O) cladding material property models as part of MATPRO package intended for joint use with thermal mechanical codes analyzing high burnup fuel transient behavior. The scope of work also included adapting U.S.NRC's FRAPTRAN code to the behavior analysis of fuel with E110 cladding (VVER type) and carrying out of the code assessment using selected experimental data. Satisfactory compliance of the results calculated by modified FRAPTRAN version with in-pile RIA and out-of-pile LOCA simulated test results is obtained. The obtained calculation data have been also compared with the predictions of the FRAP-T6 (U.S.NRC) and SCANAIR (IRSN, France) codes modified earlier.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2004118EN.01002501.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/25

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 28 April 2004

in Case C-373/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof): Sakir Öztürk v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter) (1)

1

(Article 9 of the EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Article 3 of Decision No 3/80 - Principle of equal treatment - Article 45(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Social security for migrant workers - Retirement pension - Early pension in the event of unemployment - Condition whereby the worker must have received unemployment benefits in the Member State concerned)

(2004/C 118/43)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-373/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Sakir Öztürk and Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter - on the interpretation of Article 9 of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey signed on 12 September 1963 at Ankara by the Republic of Turkey, on the one hand, and the Member States of the EEC and the Community, on the other, which was concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (Journal Officiel 1964 217, p. 3685), and of Article 45(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 (OJ 1997 L 28, p. 1) - the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann and J. Cunha Rodrigues (Presidents of Chambers), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and K. Lenaerts, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 April 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 3(1) of Decision No 3/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families must be interpreted as precluding the application of legislation of a Member State which makes entitlement to an early old-age pension in the event of unemployment conditional upon fulfilment of the requirement that the person concerned has received, within a certain period prior to his application for the pension, unemployment insurance benefits from that Member State alone.

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 11.1.2003

1

---
VOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Engine Run 0 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 10

Engine 1 0.53 0.17

Engine 2 0.46 0.27

Engine 3 0.53 0.17

Engine 4 0.45 0.17

Engine 5 0.58 0.25 Confidence 68 95 99.7

Engine 6 0.43 0.26 Average Std Dev 1 2 3

Engine 7 0.34 0.1 0.46 0.092 0.55 0.64 0.73

Engine 8 0.32 0.15 0.19 0.061 0.25 0.31 0.24

Average 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19

1 Std Dev 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25

2 Std Dev 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31

BACT 0.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

Permit 0.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26

Ave+15% 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22

0.46

0.19

0.55

0.25

0.64

0.31

0.5 0.5 0.50

0.52

0.22

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

g/kW-hr

not converted to PM10

Engine 1

Engine 2

Engine 3

Engine 4

Engine 5

Engine 6

Engine 7

Engine 8

Average

1 Std Dev

2 Std Dev

BACT

Permit

Ave+15%

Low (30%) Med (45%) High (60%)

Proposed

BACT PM 10 Limit 0.50
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation System, Surface and Subsurface

(Code 443) 

A system that delivers irrigation water by surface means,

such as furrows, borders, and contour levees, or by

subsurface means through water table control. 

Practice Information 

With surface irrigation systems, water is directly applied to

the soil surface in a way that does not cause excessive

water loss, erosion, or water quality impairment. This can be done with delivery ditches, pipelines, or

above ground multi-outlet water pipes. The soils in the field should not be excessively permeable to

avoid seepage losses. Water that runs off the end of the field can be captured and recycled with the

use of a tailwater recovery system. 

Subsurface irrigation systems are designed to maintain the water table at predetermined design

elevations below the ground surface at all points in the field. The soils in the plant root zone must be

permeable enough to allow lateral water movement from the ditches or perforated irrigation pipes.

These soils must be underlain by a slowly permeable water-restrictive layer to keep the desired water

table height. This combination of soils allows the producer to alter the water table elevation in a timely

manner in order to meet the plant needs. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 15 years. Maintenance requirements include regular

inspections, removal of sediment and debris, repair and revegetation of eroded areas and outlets,

inspection and testing of pipeline and pumping equipment, and re-grading the fields to maintain the

design grade in the direction of flow. 

Common Associated Practices 

An Irrigation System, Surface or Subsurface (Code 443) must be applied in conjunction with Irrigation

Water Management (Code 449). Other practices it is commonly applied with include Irrigation Pipeline

(Code 430), Irrigation Reservoir (Code 436), Irrigation System, Tailwater Recovery (Code 447),

Irrigation Field Ditch (Code 388), Structure for Water Control (Code 587), Pumping Plant (Code 533),

and Subsurface Drain (Code 606). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# CA2004177EN.01000101.xml

| 9.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 177/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 177/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
# C_2004284EN.01002401.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/24

---

Action brought on 10 September 2004 by Dominique Cantoni against Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-365/04)

(2004/C 284/47)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 September 2004 by Dominique Cantoni, residing in Marseilles (France), represented by Jean-François Péricaud, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities jointly and severally to pay to Mr Cantoni, as a primary claim, the sum of EUR 916 000, and, in the alternative, the sum of EUR 862 010, together, in any event, with interest at the rate prescribed by law from the date this action for payment was brought; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities jointly and severally to pay to Mr Cantoni, as a primary claim, the sum of EUR 916 000, and, in the alternative, the sum of EUR 862 010, together, in any event, with interest at the rate prescribed by law from the date this action for payment was brought;

| — | order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities jointly and severally to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities jointly and severally to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-440/03 Arizmendi and Others v Council and Commission. (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004, p. 31.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1














CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-143391, 333-30515, 333-106092, 333-117773, 333-138208, and 333-138212 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-156542 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 31, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TIB Financial Corp., which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of TIB Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/Crowe Horwath LLP


Crowe Horwath LLP





Fort Lauderdale, Florida


March 31, 2011
Exhibit 32.1





KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated:
  June 1, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard D. Kinder                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Richard D. Kinder
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





---

---
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: NUREG-Series Publications

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - Staff Reports
                  - Brochures
                  - Conference Proceedings
                  - Contractor-Prepared Reports
                  - Knowledge Management Reports
                  - International Agreement Reports
                  - All ADAMS NUREGs

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - NUREG-Series Publications

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: May 17, 2011, Conference Call with Waste Management on Landfill Gas and the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On May 17, 2011, EPA had a conference call with members of Waste Management to discuss their issues and concerns with the implementati on of the final rule enti tled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Material s That are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule.

During that meeting, Waste Management repres entatives expressed concerns with their perception of how landfill gas would be regul ated under the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information presented.

Expected or Invited Meeting Attendees: Waste Management Representatives

EPA Invitees: Keith Barnett Jim Berlow Alan Carpien David Cozzie Susmita Dubey George Faison Michael Galbraith Rachel Goldstein Mimi Guernica Toni Jones Charlotte Mooney Sonya SassevilleMaryBeth Sheridan Steven Silverman Matt Straus Marc Thomas Peter Tsirigotis Paul Versace Hillary Ward
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

R.D.L.,

Petitioner

v.

J.T.M.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 40 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# L_2016127DE.01006801.xml

| 18.5.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 127/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 127/68

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2015/2338 der Kommission vom 11. Dezember 2015 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 hinsichtlich der Vorschriften für Flugschreiber, Unterwasserortungseinrichtungen und Flugwegverfolgungssysteme

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 330 vom 16. Dezember 2015
  )

Seite 2, Artikel 1:

Anstatt:

„Anhang I (Begriffsbestimmungen), Anhang IV (Teil-CAT), Anhang VI (Teil-NCC) und Anhang VIII (Teil-SPO) der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 erhalten die Fassung des Anhangs der vorliegenden Verordnung.“

muss es heißen:

„Anhang I (Begriffsbestimmungen), Anhang IV (Teil-CAT), Anhang VI (Teil-NCC) und Anhang VIII (Teil-SPO) der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 werden gemäß dem Anhang der vorliegenden Verordnung geändert.“

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of  International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Pontius, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 30, 2007



/s/ Jeffrey A. Pontius

Jeffrey A. Pontius
  Chief Executive Officer