alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/05/2010 14:08 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 

DUJDRKIN AND ASSOC 

@|002/004 

PAGE 02/04 

D::FT Or T^-; • •"FCRlAllON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA Docket No. CP],ONM0002 

(Civil Penalty ActioTi) 

DMS No. FAA 2010-0312 

Judge: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION 

OF 

JEFFREY M. REYNOLDS 

TO ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS; 

Pursuant to Title 14 CFR Section 13.220 , SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC, by and through 

its undersigned counsel, will take the deposition, on oral examination, of FAA Aviation Safety 

Inspector JEFFREY M. REYNOLDS on Thursday, June 17, 2010, commencing at 9:30 AM, at 

Barkley Court Reporters, Golden Eagle Plaza, 525 B Street, Suite 1500, San Diego, California 

92101 (Telephone: 1-858-455-5444). The deposition will be taken before a qualified Notary 

Public and continued from day to day thereafter, Sundays and holidays excepted, at the same 

place, utJtil completed, on behalf of SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 
05/05/2010 14:08 FAX 2024935142 

J-O. J O '*J-^<*^ljlZlbO 

FAA * DMS 

DWORkIN AND ASSOC 

0003/004 

PAGE 03/04 

Dated: May 5,2010 

ivflCHAEL L. DWORKINT and ASSOCL\TES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, Califoniia 94104 ^ 

Telephone: 415-421-25W 

FAX; 415-421-2560 

Emajlr / . ]awrS>avial^^^HS 

)RKIN 

Attorney for SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 
05/05/2010 14:08 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS gl004/004 

05/05/2010 10:55 4154212560 DWORKIN AND ASSOC PA6E 04/04 

CERTEFTCArE OF SERVICE 

(49 C.F.E_ §821.8; 14 C.F.R §13.211) 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the following document: 

NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY M. REYNOLDS 

(Sky West Airlines, FAA Case No. 2009NM060048) 

via FAX and FEDEX 2-day economy delivery, to the persons and at the addresses indicated 

below; 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W, 

Washington, D.C, 20591 

FAX; 1-202-493-5142 

(Executed Original plus one copy via FEDEX; one copy via FAX) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin., Administrative Law Judge 

Adnainistrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-50, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S,E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-230 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX: 1-202-366-7536 

(One copy each via FAX and FEDEX) 

Scott R Morris, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Of&ce of the Regional Counsel, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

FAX: 1-227-1007 

(One copy each via FAX and FEDEX) 

Executed this 5* day of May, 2010 at San Francisco, California. 

JoIene<!r Brown 

Secretary
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGSTO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS**

**(inthousands, except ratios)**

 
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Three Months Ended March 31, 2007** | ** ** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           |       |                                                      |       |       |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions |       | $                                                         | 20,466     |       |   |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | 42,992                                                    |       |       |
| Earnings before  debt service                                        |       | $                                                         | 63,458     |       |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                                      |       |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | $                                                         | 42,992     |       |   |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    |       | 2,662                                                     |       |       |
| Total debt  service                                                  |       | $                                                         | 45,654     |       |   |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                                                |       |       |
| **Ratio of earnings to debt service**                                | ** ** | **1.39**                                                  |       |       |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument Collections

# Previous Site Additions

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 05, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes
          - Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials
          - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
          - Agreement State Action Items
          - Agreement State Communications
          - ASLBP
          - Commission Documents
          - Congressional Documents
          - Electronic Government (E-Gov) Documents
          - Enforcement Documents
          - Enforcement Petition (2.206)
          - Events, Reports Associated with
          - Fact Sheets & Brochures
          - Federal Register Notices (NRC)
          - Forms (NRC)
          - For the Record
          - Generic Communications
          - Generic Issues
          - Government Information Locator Service (GILS)
          - Human Factors Information System
          - Inspection Manual
          - OIG Reports
          - IMPEP Reviews of NRC Programs
          - Interim Staff Guidance
          - Management Directives
          - Memoranda of Understanding
          - News Releases
          - NMSS Procedures
          - NRC Datasets
          - NRC Infographics
          - NRC Maps
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - OMB Exhibit 300s
          - Personal Identity Verification
          - Previous Site Additions
          - Regulations (NRC, 10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides (by Division)
          - Research Information Letters
          - Rulemaking Documents
          - Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - New on Our Site

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 05, 2024
No. D-964.

#### In re Disbarment of Levine.

It is ordered that Howard Alan Levine, of Oklahoma City, Okla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
----

Action brought on 27 May 2004 by Madaus Aktiengesellschaft against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-202/04)

(2004/C 201/45)

Language of the case to be determined pursuant to Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure - language in which the application was submitted: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 27 May 2004 by Madaus Aktiengesellschaft, Köln, (Germany), represented by I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyer.

The Optima Health Limited was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
# C_2004239EN.01002302.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/23

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 May 2004

in Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Time-limits - Claim for compensation - Originating application - Formal requirements - Injunction against an institution - Manifestly inadmissible)

(2004/C 239/50)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo, residing at Rome (Italy), represented by S. Amato, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Montaguti assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer) with an address for service in Luxembourg — application for, on one hand, annulment of the Commission Decision of 30 October 2001 withdrawing financial assistance originally granted to the applicant in the context of the Joint Venture Programme for the incorporation of an Italo-Romanian joint venture company (JOP Facility 2 — Project in Romania with Phoenix European S.r.l. - J2BROSEVEN) and, on the other hand, damages in respect of the loss allegedly caused to the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The claim is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The claim is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 22.2.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby
certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.Name:

William C. Wiedel, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 15, 2010
# L_2015154EN.01001201.xml

| 19.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/945

of 15 June 2015

appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January and on 5 February 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1) and (EU) 2015/190 (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January and on 5 February 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1) and (EU) 2015/190 (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

1

2

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Helma OROSZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Helma OROSZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Marcel PHILIPP, Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Aachen. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Marcel PHILIPP, Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Aachen.

Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Aachen

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 June 2015.

For the Council

The President

K. GERHARDS

---

(1)  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

---
No. 82-6038.

#### Molovinsky *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Kaezrowski and wife, Respondents, vs. Liberty State Bank, imp., Appellant.

For the appellant: *Sol P. Huntington*of Green Bay.

For the respondents: *Winter & Winter*of Shawano.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 204 

To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Genetically Engineered 

5 Salmon Labeling Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 

7 It is the purpose of this Act to— 

8 (1) ensure that consumers in the United States 

9 can make informed decisions when purchasing salm10 on; and 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 204 IH

1 (2) authorize an independent scientific review 

2 of— 

3 (A) the possible effects of genetically engi4 neered salmon on wild salmon stocks; and 

5 (B) the Food and Drug Administration’s 

6 approval of genetically engineered salmon for 

7 human consumption. 

8 SEC. 3. MARKET NAME FOR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED 

9 SALMON. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of law, for purposes of applying the Federal Food, 

12 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the ac13 ceptable market name of any salmon that is genetically 

14 engineered shall include the words ‘‘Genetically Engi15 neered’’ or ‘‘GE’’ prior to the existing acceptable market 

16 name. 

17 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, salm18 on is genetically engineered if it has been modified by re19 combinant DNA (rDNA) techniques, including the entire 

20 lineage of salmon that contain the rDNA modification. 

21 SEC. 4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW OF CERTAIN SALMON AP22 PROVAL. 

23 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

24 ensure that an independent scientific organization con25 ducts a review of the environmental assessment that was 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 204 IH

1 carried out by the Food and Drug Administration in sup2 port of an approval of a new animal drug application re3 lated to AquAdvantage Salmon, dated November 12, 

4 2015. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4309

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BERNARD THOMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-15)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: October 28, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert W. Louthian, LOUTHIAN & LOUTHIAN, Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellant. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Thompson pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) (1994) and was

sentenced to ninety-seven months imprisonment. On appeal, Thompson

contends that during sentencing the court improperly denied him a

downward departure for his cooperation with the Government because

the information he provided was not useful. Thompson's attorney has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), asserting that there are no meritorious issues for appeal.

Thompson was notified of his right to file an additional brief, but

has not done so. We affirm.

Thompson's claim has no factual basis. Our review of the transcripts of the sentencing hearing discloses that the court granted

the Government's oral motion to allow Thompson a two-level downward

departure in his sentence for his cooperation and sentenced Thompson accordingly. We therefore find Thompson's claim meritless.

In accordance with Anders, we have examined the entire record

in this case and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the

conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform

his client in writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of

the United States for further review. If the client requests that

a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave

to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that

a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court, and oral argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-4401

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MILLIS SHAKILYA BRYSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-96-7)

 

Argued: December 2, 2005 Decided: December 21, 2005

 

Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and Walter D.

KELLEY, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District

of Virginia, sitting by designation.

 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

 

ARGUED: Thomas Norman Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender,

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North

Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United

States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c). 
-2-

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-appellant Millis Shakilya Bryson was sentenced to

two years in federal prison after the district court found that he

had violated the conditions of supervised release previously

imposed upon him pursuant to his conviction for violating the

federal prohibition against possession of a firearm by a felon. He

appeals, claiming that the maximum statutory period of supervised

release had elapsed before his violations occurred and that the

district court therefore lacked jurisdiction to return him to

prison for two more years.

Appellant’s entire claim rests on an erroneous belief as to

the end date of the supervised release period. Appellant was

subject to the maximum three year supervised release period, which

was originally scheduled to end on April 22, 2001. J.A. 17. But

because appellant was incarcerated in state prison for a period of

51 months and 22 days –- from December 9, 1999, to January 16,

2004, and from February 23, 2004, to May 8, 2004, J.A. 17 –- the

supervised release period was tolled for that amount of time

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e). 51 months and 22 days after April

22, 2001, is August 14, 2005. 

Appellant has relied on the probation officer’s erroneous

calculation that, after tolling, the supervised release period was

scheduled to end on September 13, 2004. J.A. 35-36. This reliance

has caused appellant to argue mistakenly that his violations of the
-3-

supervised release conditions occurred after his supervised release

period had ended. The violations, which occurred on September 28,

2004, and January 15, 2005, J.A. 113-14, plainly occurred before

August 14, 2005. The district court therefore clearly had

jurisdiction to revoke appellant’s supervised release and sentence

him to two years in prison. The judgment of the district court is

affirmed. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT In
connection with the annual report of New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David P. Tusa,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that: (1)
  The Form
  10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2004, fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and(2)
  The
  information contained in the Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31,
  2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings Corp.  By:
  /s/
  DAVID P. TUSA
  
  Date:  March
  29, 2004David P.
  Tusa
  Executive Vice President,
  Chief Financial Officer and
  Corporate Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,338
<INVENTORY>                                    129,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,567
<PP&E>                                         162,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,325
<BONDS>                                        144,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,808
<SALES>                                         59,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,402
<CGS>                                           29,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>