alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Non-Discrimination Statement

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Non-Discrimination Statement 

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs).  Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.  

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.  Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information  requested in the form.  To request a copy of the complaint form, call 

(866) 632-9992.  Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by:

(1)    mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture

         Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

         1400 Independence Avenue, SW

         Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; 

(2)    fax: (202) 690-7442; or 

(3)    email: program.intake@usda.gov.   

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2169 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance information sharing 

in the Department of Homeland Security State, Local, and Regional 

Fusion Center Initiative, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. KATKO (for himself, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. KEATING) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance 

information sharing in the Department of Homeland Security State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center Initiative, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Fusion Cen5 ters’ Access to Information Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2169 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED INFORMATION SHARING IN THE DE2 PARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY STATE, 

3 LOCAL, AND REGIONAL FUSION CENTER INI4 TIATIVE. 

5 Subsection (b) of section 210A of the Homeland Se6 curity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124h) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the 

8 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘and conduct 

9 outreach to such fusion centers to identify any gaps 

10 in information sharing and consult with other Fed11 eral agencies to develop methods to address such 

12 gaps, as appropriate’’; 

13 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

14 (12) as paragraphs (4) through (13), respectively; 

15 and 

16 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol17 lowing new paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(3) identify Federal databases and information 

19 systems, including systems used, operated, or man20 aged by Department components, the Federal Bu21 reau of Investigation, and the Department of the 

22 Treasury, that are appropriate for inclusion in the 

23 information sharing environment and coordinate 

24 with the appropriate Federal agency to deploy or ac25 cess such systems;’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 1 - Power Reactors

# Power Reactors (Division 1): Regulatory Guides 1.141 - 1.160

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 1, "Power Reactors," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 19, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 1.1 - 1.20
          - Regulatory Guides 1.21 - 1.40
          - Regulatory Guides 1.41 - 1.60
          - Regulatory Guides 1.61 - 1.80
          - Regulatory Guides 1.81 - 1.100
          - Regulatory Guides 1.101 - 1.120
          - Regulatory Guides 1.121 - 1.140
          - Regulatory Guides 1.141 - 1.160
          - Regulatory Guides 1.161 - 1.180
          - Regulatory Guides 1.181 - 1.200
          - Regulatory Guides 1.201 - 1.220
          - Regulatory Guides 1.221 - 1.240
          - Regulatory Guides 1.241 - 1.253

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 19, 2024
EXHIBIT 10.43


               TERMINATION OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

                  THIS AGREEMENT is made as of November 7, 2000,

BETWEEN:

               E*Comnetrix  Inc., a company duly  incorporated  under the Canada
               Business  Corporations  Act and having an office at 100 Shoreline
               Hwy, Suite 386B, Mill Valley, California

               (the "Company")

AND:

               Mark M. Smith, of 220 S. Rock Blvd. Ste. 9, Reno, Nevada

               (the "Recipient")

WHEREAS:

     A. By  agreement  (the  "SAR  Agreement")  made as of March 10,  2000,  the
Company granted to the Recipient 250,000 stock appreciation rights (the "SARs");
and

     B. The Company and the Recipient wish to terminate the SAR Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT  WITNESSES THAT in  consideration  of the recitals,
the following  agreements,  the payment of One Dollar ($1.00) made by each party
to the  other,  and other  good and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt  and
sufficiency  of  which is  acknowledged  by each  party,  the  parties  agree as
follows:

          1.   The SAR Agreement  will be terminated  and of no further force or
               effect  and will no  longer  be  binding  upon the  Company,  its
               successors  and  assigns  or upon  the  Recipient  and his  legal
               personal representatives effective as of November 7, 2000.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF this agreement has been executed as of the day and year
first above written.


E*COMNETRIX INC.                                     )
                                                     )
                                                     )
                                                     )        C/S
__/s/ [Illegible]__________                          )
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED                         )
By MARK M. SMITH in the                              )
presence of:                                         )
                                                     )
                                                     ) ____/s/ [Ilegible]_______
  /s/ [Illegible]                                    ) MARK M. SMITH
---------------------------
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                      AWARD SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (in thousands except per share amount)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       -----------------------
                                                        1996    1995    1994
                                                       ------- ------- -------
<S>                                                    <C>     <C>     <C>
Weighted average common shares........................   5,482   5,768   5,998
Weighted average common equivalent shares.............     798     770     347
                                                       ------- ------- -------
Total weighted average common and common equivalent
 shares...............................................   6,280   6,538   6,345
                                                       ======= ======= =======
Net income............................................ $ 2,885 $ 1,165 $ 1,258
                                                       ======= ======= =======
Net income per share.................................. $  0.46 $  0.18 $  0.20
                                                       ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
 
NET INCOME PER SHARE
 
  Net Income per Share is computed using the weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares, when dilutive, from stock options and warrants
(using the treasury stock method). Pursuant to a Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin, common and common equivalent shares
(using the treasury stock method and the public offering price) issued by the
Company within 12 months prior to the Company's initial public offering filing
have been included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all
periods through the effective date of the Company's initial public offering.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(b)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 8
                                       TO
                            THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
                              DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN



         THIS AMENDMENT is made this 28th day of December, 2000, by The Lamson &
Sessions Co. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company");

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Company maintains The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred
Savings Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to make certain amendments
thereto; and

         WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Company to amend the Plan in order to
exclude deferrals from gainsharing programs;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of the
date of this Amendment, as follows:

         1.       Section 2.7 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding subsection
                  (d) thereto, as follows:

                  (d)      any and all gainsharing programs, which provide bonus
                           payments for cost savings and/or increased
                           efficiency.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officers, has
caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                    THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.

                                    By: /s/ Charles E. Allen
                                        ----------------------------------------


                                    TRUSTEES:

                                    /s/ James J. Abel
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    /s/ Charles E. Allen
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    /s/ Lucille C. Andreano
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    /s/ Lori L. Spencer
                                    --------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALTIGEN
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) FOR MARCH
31, 2000 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,836
<SECURITIES>                                    21,519
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (370)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,599
<PP&E>                                           1,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (832)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,126
<SALES>                                          5,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,655
<CGS>                                            2,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,018)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Crop Rotation, Cover Crop, Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Water Management, Residue and Tillage Management-Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management-No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management-Ridge Till, Residue Management-Seasonal, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.

****

****

****

****

****

****

****

****
# C_2004300EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 7 October 2004

in Case C-153/01: Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Clearance of accounts - Financial years 1996 to 1998 - Decision 2001/137/EC)

(2004/C 300/01)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-153/01: action for partial annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 9 April 2001, by Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde) against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: S. Pardo Quintillán) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C. W. A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, R. Schintgen and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2001/137/EC of 5 February 2001 excluding from community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in so far as it applies to the Kingdom of Spain a financial correction corresponding to the sum of 2 426 259 870 ESP in respect of interest due under the additional milk levy scheme; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2001/137/EC of 5 February 2001 excluding from community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in so far as it applies to the Kingdom of Spain a financial correction corresponding to the sum of 2 426 259 870 ESP in respect of interest due under the additional milk levy scheme;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay four fifths of the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay four fifths of the costs;

| 4. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay one fifth of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay one fifth of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 186 of 30.6.2001.

1

---
# C_2004228EN.01001502.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-419/03: Commission of the European Communities against French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Partial failure to transpose - Burden of proof - Directive 2001/18/EC)

(2004/C 228/29)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-419/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker and F. Simonetti) against French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and D. Petrausch) — application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | By failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into national law the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC which differ from or go beyond those of Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/18. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose into national law the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC which differ from or go beyond those of Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/18.

| 2. | The remainder of the action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the action is dismissed.

| 3. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2155 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 

2006 to authorize funds to identify and eliminate excessive occupational 

licensure. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 to authorize funds to identify and 

eliminate excessive occupational licensure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Hope and Oppor5 tunity through the Power of Employment Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘New HOPE Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2155 IH

1 SEC. 2. STATE LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES. 

2 Section 124(c) of the Carl D. Perkins Career and 

3 Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2344(c)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

6 (16); 

7 (2) by striking the period at the end of para8 graph (17) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(18) consulting and coordinating with other 

11 State agencies for the identification, consolidation, 

12 or elimination of licenses or certifications which pose 

13 an unnecessary barrier to entry for aspiring workers 

14 and provide limited consumer protection.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS