alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004239EN.01002804.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/28

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-284/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/63)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 4 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-284/99, Vlutters Kapitein B.V., supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 19.2.2000.

1

---
Exhibit
        32.1
  Certification
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        John
        Kinney, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, that:
  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: June 27, 2008/s/ John KinneyJohn
                  Kinney, Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00330-CR

Rogelio RINCON, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR2442

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file the electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk 

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court 

clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the periodic report amendment of Endocare,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Michael R. Rodriguez, Senior Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best ofmy knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the    periods indicated.     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.     /s/ Michael R. Rodriguez       Michael R. Rodriguez     Senior Vice President, Finance and     Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 16, 2005
HomeNuclear SecurityDomestic SafeguardsPhysical Protection

# Armed Response

To protect public health and safety and the common defense and security, the licensee is responsible for defending nuclear material or a nuclear facility against an attack, using armed responders. This may include the use of deadly force if necessary.

## Response capabilities

        - Fixed Sites: Depending upon the significance of the material or facilities being protected, armed response to an unauthorized intrusion into a protected area and attack on a nuclear facility could be by the --	           - Licensee's on-site armed security force, with the Local Law Enforcement Authority (LLEA) and FBI arriving later
          - LLEA 
        - Transportation: Armed response to an attack on a nuclear transport would be by the --	           - Licensee's armed escorts in the case of a shipment of Category I material (strategically significant SNM), with FBI and LLEA arriving later.
          - Licensee's armed escorts and LLEA in the case of a shipment of spent fuel or other high activity shipments. 

## Response Preparation

        - Response elements must be appropriately armed and in sufficient number to counter the potential threat.
        - A licensee's armed security officers undergo significant training and qualification in, among other things:	           - physical fitness
          - weapons safety
          - nuclear and radiation safety
          - weapons proficiency
          - use of force
          - tactical movements
          - response strategies 
        - Because of redundancy of safety equipment at nuclear facilities, the plant may elect a protection strategy that protects only a subset of vital equipment. The subset is determined in advance to be sufficient to permit safe shutdown of the reactor or facility. The subset to protect may vary depending upon where the adversary enters the protected area.
        - Interaction with the LLEA includes advance planning and coordination, including familiarity tours.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Armed Response
          - Threat Assessment
          - Intrusion Alarm Assessment
          - Intrusion Detection
          - Physical Protection Areas
          - Regulatory Initiatives

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Diversion, Subsurface Drain, Terrace, Underground Outlet, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

Media Contact
Libby Barland
Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
38345 West 10 Mile Road, Suite 100
Farmington Hills, MI  48335
561-237-2243
http://www.childtime.com

                                                           FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                                                                 August 29, 2002

       Childtime Announces New Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Farmington Hills, MI: Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. (Nasdaq:CTIM) is pleased
to announce the appointment of Frank M. Jerneycic as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Jerneycic succeeds Mr. Leonard Tylka, interim CFO,
effective August 30, 2002. Mr. Jerneycic was formerly Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Decision Consultants, Inc. of Southfield, MI.

Bill Davis, President and CEO of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc., stated, "I
am extremely pleased that Frank has made the decision to help lead the company
going forward. Frank has the financial and strategic leadership skills to enable
Childtime to achieve its long-term profit and growth objectives and to become
the premier leader in the child care industry." Mr. Jerneycic commented, "I am
excited to be a part of this new leadership team operating in such a dynamic
growth industry."

Childtime Learning Centers, Inc., of Farmington Hills, MI acquired Tutor Time
Learning Systems, Inc. on July 19, 2002 and is now the nation's third largest
publicly traded child care provider with operations in 30 states, the District
of Columbia and internationally. Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. has over 7,500
employees and provides education and care for over 50,000 children daily in over
450 corporate and franchise centers nationwide.

Statements included herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private/Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve a number of
risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, continuation of federal
and state assistance programs, demand for childcare as well as general economic
conditions, pricing and competition. Accordingly actual results could differ
materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

                                       ###
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

                          MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
                                    BETWEEN
                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
                                      AND
                                  MARK TURNER
                                        

1.  The Ashton Technology Group, Inc, ("ATG(TM)") wishes to engage Dr. Mark
Turner ("Turner") as Vice President of Advanced Analytics.

2.  In consideration for his services to ATG(TM), Turner will be paid a cash
salary of $110,000 per annum.

In further consideration of his services to ATG(TM), Turner will be granted: (i)
a 5 year option to purchase 100,000 shares of ATG(TM) common stock at the last
sale price of the common stock on July 27, 1998, and (ii) a 5 year option to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock in ATG(TM)'s subsidiary, Universal
Trading Technologies Corporation ("UTTC"), at a price of $1.00 per share.

The option package described above will vest so that Turner receives 20% of the
referenced options upon completion of his first year of employment with ATG,
another 20% of the granted total upon completion of his second year, and the
remaining 60% upon the completion of his third year of employment.

It is understood that the shares underlying these options will not initially be
registered, however, ATG(TM) agrees that in the case of the shares underlying
the ATG(TM) option, ATG(TM) will endeavor to register the underlying shares at
such time that other shares underlying management or consultants' options are
registered pursuant to Form S-8 or any other appropriate registration statement.

3.  Turner's employment with ATG(TM) will commence on July 27, 1998, but Turner
is not expected to be present in ATG(TM)'s offices until August 3, 1998.

4.  Turner will be eligible to participate in ATG(TM)'s fully paid health
insurance plan and in ATG(TM)'s non-contributory 401(k).
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Wastewater Treatment, Milk House (Code 627) 

The physical, mechanical, and biological treatment of dairy

milk house wastewater. 

Practice Information 

This practice is applied to achieve one or both of the

following: 

• Improve water quality by reducing nutrients in surface

and groundwater 

• Improve air quality by reducing odors 

This practice applies to all milking operations where milk house wastewater is generated and where

soils, geology, and topography are suitable for construction of a milk house wastewater treatment

system. 

The milk house wastewater treatment system typically consists of five components: 

1. Pretreatment tank for a 3-day hydraulic retention time that is required to reduce solids,

detergents, fat, oil, and grease (FOG) content of the wastewater. The pretreatment component

reduces the total solids and nutrients content by half in clarifying the wastewater for final

treatment. 

2. Storage tank for the clarified wastewater after pretreatment. 

3. Transfer component, typically a pump system to distribute the stored pretreated wastewater. 

4. A distribution system to uniformly apply the wastewater to the final wastewater treatment

component. 

5. A final wastewater treatment component that processes the nutrient content and utilizes the

wastewater. Based on the site conditions, different strategies can be used for the final

wastewater treatment component. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Wastewater Treatment, Milk House (Code 627) is

commonly applied with NRCS CPS Diversion (Code 362), Roof Runoff Structure (Code 558),

Vegetated Treatment Area (Code 635), or Constructed Wetland (Code 656).
*April 7, 1931.*

#### Finder (Ernest), Respondent, vs. Beckley, Appellant. Finder (Augusta), Respondent, vs. Beckley, Appellant. Beckley, Respondent, vs. Beckley, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Hughes & Anderson*of Superior.

For the respondents: *Currcm & Sher*of Superior.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed in each case. Only one bill of costs allowed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001003464
<NAME>     Endocare Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     5122936
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1294928
<ALLOWANCES>                                383989
<INVENTORY>                                1362723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7571459
<PP&E>                                     1748496
<DEPRECIATION>                             (640255)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            11195716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3830321
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     11384
<OTHER-SE>                                20000503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              11195716
<SALES>                                    1137910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1311030
<CGS>                                       518107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               615330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3384138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          396127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (3013668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3013668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (3013668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.27)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.01

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

           List of Registrant's Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Name of Company           Jurisdiction                      Ownership
    ---------------       -------------------- -------------------------------------------
<S>                       <C>                  <C>
Arca Systems, Inc. .....  Delaware             100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
American Information
 Systems, Inc. .........  Illinois             100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Cohesive Technology
 Solutions, Inc. .......  Delaware             100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. .........  Illinois             100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. .........  Louisiana            100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. (CA1)....  California           100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. (CA2)....  California           100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. (CA3)....  California           100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cohesive Network
 Systems, Inc. (CA4)....  California           100% -- Cohesive Technology Solutions, Inc.
KeyLabs, Inc. ..........  Utah                 100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Service Metrics, Inc. ..  Delaware             100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 Australia Pty Limited..  Australia            100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 (Bermuda) Limited......  Bermuda              100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 B.V. ..................  Netherlands          100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 GmbH...................  Germany              100% -- Exodus Internet Limited
Exodus Communications
 KK.....................  Japan (Minato-Ku)    100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 KK.....................  Japan (Shinjuku-Ku)   85% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Communications
 SARL...................  France               100% -- Exodus Internet Limited
Exodus Communications
 (Singapore) Pte Ltd....  Singapore            100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Internet (Canada)
 Inc. ..................  Canada               100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Internet (Canada)
 Holding Corporation....  Canada (Nova Scotia) 100% -- Exodus Communications B.V.
Exodus Internet
 (Ireland) Limited......  Ireland              100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Exodus Internet
 Limited................  UK                   100% -- Exodus Communications, Inc.
Grenville Consulting
 (UK) Limited...........  UK                   100% -- Exodus Internet Limited
</TABLE>
# C_2004156EN.01000103.xml

| 12.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

(2004/C 156/03)

At its meeting on 13 May 2004, the Court decided to assign the Judges to Chambers as follows:

First Chamber

Mr Jann, President of the Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Ms Colneric, Mr Lenaerts, Mr Schiemann, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič and Mr Levits, Judges.

Second Chamber

Mr Timmermans, President of the Chamber

Mr Gulmann, Mr Schintgen, Ms Silva de Lapuerta, Mr Makarczyk, Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis and Mr Klučka, Judges.

Third Chamber

Mr Rosas, President of the Chamber

Mr La Pergola, Mr Puissochet, Ms Macken, Mr von Bahr, Mr Borg-Barthet, Mr Malenovský and Mr Lõhmus, Judges.

Fourth Chamber

Mr Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber

Ms Colneric, Mr Lenaerts, Mr Schiemann, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič and Mr Levits, Judges.

Fifth Chamber

Mr Gulmann, President of the Chamber

Mr Schintgen, Ms Silva de Lapuerta, Mr Makarczyk, Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis and Mr Klučka, Judges.

Sixth Chamber

Mr Puissochet, President of the Chamber

Mr La Pergola, Ms Macken, Mr von Bahr, Mr Borg-Barthet, Mr Malenovský and Mr Lõhmus, Judges.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 184 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 528
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2018

                     Received; read the first time

                             July 26, 2018

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Medical Innovation Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subchapter E.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (a) of section 4221 of such Code is amended 
        by striking the last sentence.
            (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6416(b) of such Code is 
        amended by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of subchapters for chapter 32 of 
such Code is amended by striking the item relating to subchapter E.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales after December 31, 2019.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 528

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 26, 2018

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```