alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited  consolidated  fiancial  statements  at May 31,  1997 and for the nine
month  period  ended May 31, 1997 is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
such financial  statements.  Earnings per share information has been restated to
conform with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003934
<NAME>                        Unidigital Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          3,475,176
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,891,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                      389,288
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,165,043
<PP&E>                                         12,623,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,346,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,929,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,167,925
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           32,243
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,380,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,929,039
<SALES>                                        18,157,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,157,668
<CGS>                                           9,624,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   9,624,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,018,091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                695,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,879,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                      634,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,245,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,245,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.39<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.39<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Represents  basic  earnings  per share in  accordance  with SAFAS No.  128,
     Earnings Per Share.
<F2> Represents  diluted  earnigns  per share in  accordance  with SFAS No. 128,
     Earnings Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# L_2020406DE.01007701.xml

| 3.12.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 406/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 406/77

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1998 der Kommission vom 5. November 2015 zur Festlegung detaillierter Maßnahmen für die Durchführung der gemeinsamen Grundstandards für die Luftsicherheit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 299 vom 14. November 2015
  )

Seite 5, Anhang Nummer 1.2.2.2 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

| „a) | eine gültige Bordkarte oder ein gleichwertiges Äquivalent oder“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

eine gültige Bordkarte oder ein gleichwertiges Äquivalent oder“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | eine gültige Bordkarte oder ein Äquivalent oder“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

eine gültige Bordkarte oder ein Äquivalent oder“.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2552

_____________________________

MICHAEL WILLIS MITCHELL II,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

August 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

__________________ 

NO. 09-22-00098-CR 

__________________ 

DYLAN GAUVIN, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

__________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 435th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 20-03-03475-CR 

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Dylan Gauvin filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. 

Gauvin and Gauvin’s attorney signed the motion. See id. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 

 APPEAL DISMSSED. 

 PER CURIAM 

Submitted on April 19, 2022 

Opinion Delivered April 20, 2022 

Do Not Publish 

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Mississippi - Fiscal Year 2024
# Range Planting (Ac.) (550) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Range Planting (Ac.) (550) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Range Planting (Ac.) (550).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Range Planting (Ac.) (550) (7/2022) Standard Document(98.17 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Range Planting (Ac.) (550) Overview(568.77 KB)

Range Planting (Ac.) (550) Network Diagram(78.69 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Range Planting

This video explores how Eric Jennings implemented this conservation practice on his ranch in Spearfish, South Dakota.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# L_2015280EN.01003001.xml

| 24.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/30

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1917

of 20 October 2015

on the acceptance of Switzerland's contribution for the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/4/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions to EUCAP Sahel Mali by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions to EUCAP Sahel Mali by third States.

| (2) | Following the recommendation of the Civilian Operations Commander, the PSC should accept the proposed contribution from Switzerland to EUCAP Sahel Mali and should consider the contribution as significant. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendation of the Civilian Operations Commander, the PSC should accept the proposed contribution from Switzerland to EUCAP Sahel Mali and should consider the contribution as significant.

| (3) | Therefore, Switzerland should be exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUCAP Sahel Mali, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Therefore, Switzerland should be exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUCAP Sahel Mali,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Third States' contributions

1.   The contribution from Switzerland to EUCAP Sahel Mali is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Switzerland is exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUCAP Sahel Mali.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6963

SAMMY JUNIOR MORGAN, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-03-849) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sammy Junior Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In his informal brief Morgan seeks to raise, for the first time, a claim pursuant to the recent Supreme Court case of Blakely v. Washington , 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004). Even if properly before this court for consideration, Blakelywould offer Morgan no relief, because, inter alia , the Supreme Court has not made its ruling in Blakelyretroactive to cases on collateral review. See In re Dean , 375 F.3d 1287, 1290 (11th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir. 2001) (holding that the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the precursor to Blakely , is not retroactively applicable to cases on (continued...) - 2 - PER CURIAM: Sammy Junior Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Morgan that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Morgan failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Morgan has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. * Accordingly, we deny Morgan’s motion to proceed in forma* (...continued) collateral review). - 3 - pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2477

In Re: EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Debtor.

_________________________

TERRY L. MUSIKA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-1855-H, BK-90-5-308-JS, CA-96-1881-H, BK-90-5-3087-

JS, ADV-91-5-5430-JS)

Submitted: December 2, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward R. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Oestreicher, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland; Terry L. Musika,

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming

the bankruptcy court's orders denying Appellant's motions for reconsideration of the orders approving the settlement of a claim of

the bankruptcy estate and approving payment of compensation to the

attorneys for the Trustee. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Musika v. Butler,

Nos. CA-96-1855-H; BK-90-5-308-JS; CA-96-1881-H; BK-90-5-3087-JS;

ADV-91-5-5430-JS (D. Md. Sept. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1812 

To provide that the Executive order entitled ‘‘Promoting Energy Independence 

and Economic Growth’’ (March 28, 2017), shall have no force or effect, 

to prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the Executive order, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Mr. TONKO, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CRIST, Mr. 

BEYER, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

DELANEY, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. LEE, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of 

New York, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

PETERS, Mr. POCAN, Mr. POLIS, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. 

HUFFMAN, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CLAY, Ms. MICHELLE

LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. HASTINGS, and Mr. CARTWRIGHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, the Judiciary, and 

Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that the Executive order entitled ‘‘Promoting 

Energy Independence and Economic Growth’’ (March 28, 

2017), shall have no force or effect, to prohibit the 

use of Federal funds to enforce the Executive order, 

and for other purposes. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1812 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Leader5 ship In Mitigating Administration Threats to the Earth 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘CLIMATE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER TO HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT. 

8 Beginning on March 28, 2017, the Executive order 

9 entitled ‘‘Promoting Energy Independence and Economic 

10 Growth’’ (March 28, 2017), is null and void, shall have 

11 no force or effect, and may not be implemented, adminis12 tered, or enforced. 

13 SEC. 3. NO FUNDS AVAILABLE. 

14 No Federal funds may be used to implement, admin15 ister, or enforce (including through the issuance of any 

16 regulations) the Executive order entitled ‘‘Promoting En17 ergy Independence and Economic Growth’’ (March 28, 

18 2017). 

19 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This Act shall take effect on March 28, 2017. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Lunde and another, Respondents, vs. City of Watertown, Appellant.

*May 12*

October *13, 1931.*

*430For the appellant there were briefs by *R. W. Lueck*of Watertown, city attorney, and *Olin & Butler*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *R. M. Riesef*of Madison.

*W. N: Powers*of Beaver Dam, for the respondents.

The following opinion was filed June 12, 1931:

Nelson, J.

This case is ruled by the decision announced this day in *Christoph v. City of Chilton, ante,*p. 418, 237 N. W. 134, wherein it is held that sec. 62.075, Stats., as enacted by ch. 353 of the Laws of 1929, is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county is reversed, with directions to dismiss the petition.

Owen, Fritz, and Wickhem, JJ., dissent.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on October 13, 1931.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Early Leak Detection External to Structures at Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-2151)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2151 (PDF - 28.14 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2012**Date Published:** April 2013

**Prepared by:** Mark Fuhrmann and Joseph Kanney

Iouri Prokofiev, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Concerns about inadvertent releases of radioactive liquids to the environment from nuclear power plants have prompted consideration of ways to provide early leak detection in the subsurface external to the structures of the facilities. Approaches to this include the use of single-point sensors to detect changes in moisture content in the vadose zone. While many of these sensors are sensitive and relatively durable, they only interrogate about 1 liter of soil. Arrays of single-point sensors could provide adequate coverage of larger areas. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional geophysical methods provide information for much larger areas. These methods sense moisture or other parameters that may be related to leaks, such as changes in conductivity/resistivity, permittivity, or temperature. Use of cross-borehole geophysics may provide coverage of vertical planes of soil while horizontal boreholes (or horizontal tubes installed during construction) can be used to interrogate planes underneath areas of concern. Other techniques include detection of tritium in soil vapor and temperature changes using coaxial cables. Some of these methods can be made autonomous. The methods are critically reviewed and discussed with emphasis on practical application at nuclear power plants. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held a public workshop on February 15, 2012, to discuss many of these methods with experts and interested parties. Recommendations are made for NRC’s Long-Term Research Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------


                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549
                                -----------------


                                    FORM 10-Q


    (Mark One)
           [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                       For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
                                       OR
           [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        For the transition period from    to
                         Commission File Number 0-27460



                     PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

            Delaware                                      16-1158413
  (State or other jurisdiction of           (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   incorporation of organization)

 315 Science Parkway, Rochester New York                           14620
 (Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip Code)

                              -------------------

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (716) 256-0200

                          -----------------------------



     Indicate  by check mark  whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No .

     The  number of shares  outstanding  of the  registrant's  common  stock was
13,259,838 as of August 1, 2000.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM November 2022

Aquatic Organism Passage 

(Fish Passage) (396)

1. Unrestricted pathway for 

migratory aquatic organisms 

C.2 (+/-) Recreational 

opportunities

D.2 (+) Stream function as 

aquatic habitat

C.4 (+/-) Income and 

income stability (individuals 

and community) 

I.2 (+) Habitat use 

by aquatic 

organisms

Initial setting: Small rivers, streams, and outlets of ponds 

or lakes where barriers impede passage of aquatic 

organisms. Removal of barriers or replacement of small 

structures will result in improved passage without 

significant changes to the hydrology of the system.

D.1 (+) Habitat connectivity; 

(-) fragmentation

I.4 (+) Natural flow 

patterns

I.5 (+/-) 

Channel/shoreline/ 

streambank erosion

Channel Bed 

Stabilization 

(584)

)

I.3 (+) Aquatic 

population survival 

C.3 (+) Water 

quality C.1 (+) Biodiversity 

I.1 (+) Upstream and 

downstream movement 

of fish and other 

aquatic species

D.4 (+) Cost for installation 

and maintenance 

I.6 (-) Sedimentation

I.7 (+/-) Net 

return 

Start

D.3 (+) Exposed soil due 

to construction activities 

Critical Area 

Planting (342)

Streambank 

and Shoreline 

Protection (580)

Mulching 

(484) LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) or 

minus (-). These symbols indicate only 

an increase (+) or a decrease (-) in the 

effect upon the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

The scope of the practice implementation 

and resulting effects are limited to those 

described in the “initial setting.” 

Stream Habitat Improvement 

and Management (395)
#### United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellant vs. Waukesha Lime & Stone Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *John C. Love*and *Richard B. Johns,*both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Jacobson, Malone & Hippenmeyer*of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Instructions for fixing automatic pesticide update notifications in WIN-PST:

1) Start Windows Pesticide Screening Tool (WIN-PST)

2) Open New -> Options

3) Locations tab -> Uncheck “Use default web site location”
4) Copy and past the new address https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/publications/win-pst_ppd_status.html into 

the space provided and select ‘Save’ and then ‘Close’.

Done! WIN-PST will now automatically check to see if a new pesticide update is available using the new web 

address.