alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Bharatan R. Patel, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2005

                                           /s/ Bharatan R. Patel
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Bharatan R. Patel
                                           Chairman, President
                                           and Chief Executive Officer

                                       22
##### 



Exhibit 10.1

Independent Auditors Consent

The Supervisory Board of
Siemens AG:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-81126) on Form S-8 of Siemens AG of our report dated November 28, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Siemens AG as of September
30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flow
and changes in shareholders equity for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 2002, which report appears in the September 30, 2002
annual report on Form 20-F of Siemens AG.

KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG

Munich, Germany
December 5, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0368
PETER GRIGG,

Plaintiffand Appellant,
v. JUDGE MATT CUFFE,

Defendant and Appellee. MAY 1 0 

### 2022 R,)wen Greenwood -If Supreme Court nf Montana ORDER

OnApril 12, 2022, we issued an Opinion in the above-entitled action, affirming the District Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Judge Matt Cuffe that Grigg's "PetitiontoOverturnUnlawfulEvictionJudgement [sic] [and]RemoveJudgeMatt Cuffe from Office" was a collateral attack barred as a matter oflaw. Grigg timely filed a Petition for Rehearing. M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a) provides that a petition for rehearing will be considered only when the Court "overlooked some fact material to the decision," when "it overlooked some question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or when "its decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. Having fully considered Grigg's positions, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted under the standards ofM. R. App. 20(1)(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk ofCourt is directed to mail copies ofthis Order to Peter Grigg and to all counsel ofrecord. DATED this It) — day ofMay, 2022 05/10/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0368•

• )
# C_2004196EN.01001001.xml

| 3.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/10

---

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO EUROPEAN CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO EUROPEAN CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS

(2004/C 196/08)

The call for applications for financial support to European consumer organisations in 2005 has been published on the Commission's website at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/consumers/tenders/information/grants/support_en.htm

---
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 0246 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 187 -AD
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Expands its Website to Include 1999 Initiatives, and "Students'/Teachers' Corner"

----

----

No. 99-74 April 12, 1999

**NRC EXPANDS ITS WEBSITE TO INCLUDE 1999 INITIATIVES,AND "STUDENTS'/TEACHERS' CORNER"**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has added two new pages to its Internet website:
        - "Initiatives 1999," to inform the public of the staff's progress on key initiatives that Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson committed to during recent Congressional hearings and in meetings with stakeholders; and
        - A students' corner and a teachers' corner, with colorful, animated information on NRC's mission and activities.

"Initiatives 1999" relates to a current period of substantial change and re-evaluation within the NRC. At Senate hearings in February and last July, and in recent stakeholder meetings, a number of concerns were discussed -- the predictability, objectivity, and timeliness of NRC decisions, the focus of agency activities, the quality of licensee interactions, and the size of NRC's staff.

In response, the Chairman asked the staff to identify high-priority issues and to develop a plan to communicate the desired outcome of these issues throughout the NRC and to the public, with opportunity for comment. Activities addressed include: risk-informed and performance-based regulation, reactor inspection and enforcement, reactor licensee performance assessment, reactor licensing and oversight, NRC organization and resources, uranium recovery, changes to the hearing process, and other specific areas requiring timely decisions.

The staff's progress on each of these initiatives will be continually updated and posted throughout the year on the "Initiatives 1999" web page.

The students' and teachers' corner site has been fashioned from a previous site for students. It now has an animated presentation that is intended to engage young students' curiosity about nuclear energy in addition to information about the NRC. It also links to a glossary of nuclear terms, a periodic table of the elements, and to some background information on nuclear issues.

The teachers' corner contains an illustrative lesson plan on nuclear energy, a reactor concepts course, and a variety of hands-on activities that could be used in the classroom to teach students about math, radiation, and nuclear activities.

Both the students' and the teachers' corner of the website will be updated and expanded periodically.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1977 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1977

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to transport an individual employed at a medical 
   facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs between a parking 
                   facility and the medical facility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

 Ms. Wasserman Schultz (for herself and Mr. Rutherford) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to transport an individual employed at a medical 
   facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs between a parking 
                   facility and the medical facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Priority Access to Reliable 
Care Act of 2017'' or the ``Veterans PARC Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYED AT A MEDICAL FACILITY 
              OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BETWEEN A PARKING 
              FACILITY AND THE MEDICAL FACILITY.

    Section 8109(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) notwithstanding section 1344 of title 31, may use a 
        passenger carrier (as that term is defined in section 1344 of 
        title 31) to transport such an employee between a parking 
        facility and the medical facility of the Department at which 
        the employee works.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Alley Cropping, Diversion, Drainage Water Management, Grassed Waterway, Integrated Pest Management, Lined Waterway or Outlet, Nutrient Management, Surface Drainage, Field Ditch, Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Section 7412 of title 38, United States Code (U.S.C.) requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General (IG) to determine and report on the five occupations of personnel of title 38 of the Department covered under 38 U.S.C. 7401 for which there are the largest staffing shortages throughout the Department as calculated over the five-year period preceding the determination. The Secretary is required to publish these findings in the                         **Federal Register**                        . Based on its review, the IG identified the following five occupations as having the largest staffing shortages in the identified time period: Medical Officer, Nurse, Physician Assistant, Physician Therapist, and Psychologist. Additional information and analysis can be found at:                         *www.va.gov/​OIG.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Karen Rasmussen, Management Review Service (10AR), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420 Telephone:                               ( print page 6179)                            (202) 461-6643. (This is not a toll-free number.)                    

## Signing Authority

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on January 30, 2015, for publication.

Dated: January 30, 2015.

Michael P. Shores, 

Chief Impact Analyst, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2015-02229 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70 -68

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
1

AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions

From: Michael Kelsey <mkelsey@okcattlemen.org>

Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:20 PM

To: AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions

Subject: Comments for AMS-LPS-14-0052: Request for Comments U.S. Standards for Grades of 

Carcass Beef

Attachments: AMS Beef Grades - Nov 2014.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Please find attached comments related to AMS‐LPS‐14‐0052.

Thank you,  

Michael Kelsey

Executive Vice President

Oklahoma Cattlemen’s Association  

405‐235‐4391 (office)

405‐403‐6097 (cell)

www.okcattlemen.org
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                           INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.
    Statement Regarding Computation of Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                               Three months ended                       Six months ended
                                                       June 30,                           June 30,
                                              ---------------------------     ---------------------------
                                                  1997             1996             1997           1996
                                                  ----             ----             ----           ----
                                                      (unaudited)                      (unaudited)
<S>                                            <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>
Net loss                                        $(14,626,000)  $ (967,000)     $(15,499,000)   $(2,114,000)
                                                ============   ==========      ============    ===========
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding:
 
     a.  Shares attributable
          to common stock outstanding              7,327,672    3,311,477         7,294,456      2,561,746
 
     b.  Shares attributable to
          mandatorily convertible preferred
          stock                                                 2,570,242                        3,044,249
 
     c.  Shares attributable to common
          stock options pursuant to                                                                 
          APB 15 and SAB 83                                                                         63,219 
                                                -----------    ----------      ------------   ------------
Weighted average common shares                                                                   
  outstanding                                      7,327,672    5,881,719         7,294,456      5,669,214 
                                                ============   ==========      ============    ===========
 
Net loss per share                                    $(2.00)      $(0.16)           $(2.12)        $(0.51)
                                                ============   ==========      ============    ===========
 
</TABLE>

                                      33
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our general partner, herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                                  TheForm 10-K/A of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the period endedDecember 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty LimitedPartnership.

 

 
| Date:  October 10, 2003 | By:    |  /s/  Thomas H. Lowder |                      |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |   |                        | Thomas H.  Lowder         |
|                    |   |                        | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                         |        |                             |                           |  |

 

----
# C_2004239EN.01002401.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/24

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 May 2004

in Joined Cases T-314/03 and T-378/03: Musée Grévin SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(PHARE/JOP Programme - Joint venture project in Poland - Community financing - Claim for reimbursement of the full amount paid - Arbitration clause - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 239/52)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-314/03 and T-378/03: Musée Grévin SA, established in Paris, (France), represented by B. Geneste and O. Davidson, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Sack and G. Boudot) — application for annulment of the letters of the Commission of 8 July and 30 September 2003 to Crédit Lyonnais seeking to recover the funds paid to the applicant by way of subsidies granted in the context of the JOP programme — Facilité 2 — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 10 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The applications are dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The applications are dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 C 275.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7541

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDDIE PALMER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2; 

2:17-cv-00217-AWA)

Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Stephen Westley Haynie, 

Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorneys, V. 

Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Palmer has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.1  Amendment to Stock Option Plan


                         NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC.
                             1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                            (Adopted on July 26, 1996
                       Effective as of September 21, 1996)


                                    AMENDMENT
                                    ---------


4.  Article IV - Effective as of January 26, 2001, section 4.2 shall be amended
to read in its entirety as follows:

     Section 4.2   Available Shares.
                   ----------------

          (a) Subject to section  5.3,  the maximum  aggregate  number of Shares
     with respect to which  Options may be granted at any time shall be equal to
     the excess of:

               (i) 401,105  Shares (before  January  26,2001) and 441,105 Shares
          (after January 25, 2001); over

               (ii) the sum of:

               (A) the number of Shares with respect to which previously granted
          Options may then or may in the future be exercised; plus

               (B) the number of Shares with respect to which previously granted
          Options have been exercised.

               (b) The maximum  aggregate number of Shares with respect to which
          Incentive Stock Options may be granted shall be 401,105 Shares.

               (c) For  purposes of this  section  4.2,  an Option  shall not be
          consid  ered as having been  exercised  to the extent that such Option
          terminates by reason other than the purchase of the related Shares. In
          no event  shall  more than a  cumulative  total of  160,331  Shares be
          issued under Options granted to Eligible Directors hereunder.


5.  Article V - Effective as of January 26, 2001, the first sentence of section
5.3(a) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          In  the  event  of  any  merger,  consolidation,   or  other  business
          reorganization  in which the Company is the surviving  entity,  and in
          the event of any stock split,  stock dividend or other event generally
          affecting  the  number of  Shares  held by each  Person  who is then a
          holder of record  of  Shares,  the  number of Shares  covered  by each
          outstanding  Option,  the number of Shares  covered  by any  automatic
          grants due to be made  thereafter  and the number of Shares  available
          pursuant to section 4.2 shall be adjusted to account for such event.