alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2003


                                                     /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Floyd Warkol
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




                                       21
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2169 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance 

information sharing in the Department of Homeland Security State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center Initiative, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2169 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Fusion Cen3 ters’ Access to Information Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ENHANCED INFORMATION SHARING IN THE DE5 PARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY STATE, 

6 LOCAL, AND REGIONAL FUSION CENTER INI7 TIATIVE. 

8 Subsection (b) of section 210A of the Homeland Se9 curity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124h) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the 

11 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘and conduct 

12 outreach to such fusion centers to identify any gaps 

13 in information sharing and consult with other Fed14 eral agencies to develop methods to address such 

15 gaps, as appropriate’’; 

16 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

17 (12) as paragraphs (4) through (13), respectively; 

18 and 

19 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol20 lowing new paragraph: 

21 ‘‘(3) identify Federal databases and datasets, 

22 including databases and datasets used, operated, or 

23 managed by Department components, the Federal 

24 Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of the 

25 Treasury, that are appropriate, in accordance with 

26 Federal laws and policies, to address any gaps iden-
3 

•HR 2169 EH

1 tified pursuant to paragraph (2), for inclusion in the 

2 information sharing environment and coordinate 

3 with the appropriate Federal agency to deploy or ac4 cess such databases and datasets;’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2169 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

Fusion Center Initiative, and for other purposes. of Homeland Security State, Local, and Regional enhance information sharing in the Department
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 for Aetna Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            32,336
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,333
<MORTGAGE>                                       6,701
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      850
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  43,486
<CASH>                                           1,463
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,913
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,983
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                334
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   1,829
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           19,902
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  2,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              865
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,033
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,913
<PREMIUMS>                                       9,289
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,565
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 134
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,175
<BENEFITS>                                      10,341
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        160
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    339
<INCOME-TAX>                                       134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                205
<DISCONTINUED>                                     446
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>There is not a  material difference between primary and fully
diluted earnings per common share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 ERP Amendment 2001-1



                                        SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

                                             EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


                                                 AMENDMENT 2001-1


Article V of the Executive Retirement Plan is amended to read as follows effective March 12, 2001:

                                                        V.
                                               TERMINATION BENEFITS

If the Participant terminates his or her employment with the Company prior to Retirement (either early or
normal), but with a deferred vested interest in the Plan, benefits will be payable under this Plan reduced by the
amounts specified in Section 3.03(a) determined as of the benefit commencement date adjusted to reflect any
distributions from the Participant's Profit Sharing Account under the Sponsor's Stock Savings Plus Plan, or
successor plan, that occurred since the employment termination date in a manner consistent with the Qualified
Plan.  If the vested individual was not a designated executive at the time employment was terminated, the Plan
benefit determined before the Section 3.03(a) reductions will be based on the Participant's Total Compensation
and service determined as of the last date of the Participant's status as a designated executive.
Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan to the contrary, any benefits payable under this Plan due to
Termination of Employment will be paid as an annuity only, beginning at age 55 and calculated as of the
Participant's Normal Retirement Age under the Qualified Plan, reduced for early retirement by multiplying that
amount by a factor of 0.536.  A joint and survivor annuity will be the normal form of benefit.  The Participant
may elect another annuity option available under the Qualified Plan, subject to the same terms and conditions as
would apply to such an election under the Qualified Plan.



                                            Southern California Edison Company



                                                    [J. Michael Mendez]
                                     ----------------------------------
                                            J. Michael Mendez, Vice President
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

rs --22 June 2015 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

r --/zazur -

NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND CENTER 

Policy: Space Law 

MESSAGE CENTER Policy: Peaceful Uses 

Policy: 18 PoFtatS) 3 4 3 

CALL 53337 

FOR 

SERVICE 

9U 1506Z 

r 1050/JCS354/22 SEPT 

RR RUEKDA 

DE RUEHCR 1845R 2650630 

ZNY SSSSS 

R 220511Z 

FM USUN NEW YORK 

TO ZEN/SECSTATE WASHDC s60 

RUEAHQ/NASA 

RUEKDA/DOD 

STATE GRNC 

BT 

 SEPT 22 

SUBJ: OUTER SPACE 

IT IS NOW EVIDENT, AS USDEL HAS THOUGHT LIKELY FOR SEVERAL 

MONTHS, THAT USSR IS UNWILLING TO CONCLUDE A&R AGREEMENT 

ON BASIS DISCUSSED WITH SOVDEL HERE IN NEW YORK LAST APRIL 1. 

NOT CLEAR TO WHAT EXTENT THIS STEMS FROM SOV DECISION TO 

REACH NO AGREEMENTS WITH US IN SPACE FIELD AT THIS TIME 

BECAUSE ON EYTRANEOUS POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS (VIET NAM, 

SSru POSTURE VIS-A-VIS CHINA) OR FROM ACUTE SENSITIVITY ON WHAT 

USSR SEES AS SECURITY ASPECTS OF A&R AGREEMENT. MOROZOV STATEMENTS 

IN COMMITTEE STRESS REPEATEDLY THE PROBLEM OF MILITARY 

"OBJECTS AND ENGINES LAUNCHED BY AN ENEMY NOT IN ACCORANCE 

WITH THE DECLARATION"; THIS MORNING HE SPOKE OF "UNEXPLODED 

BOMB" REENTERING FROM SPACE AND THE UNACCEPTABILITY OF AN 

OBLIGATION TO RETURN IT. WHILE HE DID NOT SAY SO DIRECTLY, 

MOROZOV TRIED TO LEAVE IMPRESSION THAT PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 

1 IN SOV DRAFT AGREEMENT WAS UNQUALIFIED IN ITS GUARANTY 

OF PROTECTION FOR ASTRONAUTS, THAT SOV LIMITATION ON RETURN, 

ACT__DDRE-3 

INFO„...CJCS-1 DJS-3 SJCS-1 J3-8 NMCC-1 SAMAA-1 SECDEF-7 ASD/ISA -9 

GC-1 ARPA-1 DIA-15 CSA-2 CNO-2 CSAF-2 CMC-7 FILE-1 (65)KLH/F 

PAGE 1 OF 2 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

— 22 June 2015 

- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE t7.CR Et NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND CENTER 

MESSAGE CENTER 

r IN PARAGRAPH 2 APPLIED ONLY TO OBJECTS. 

THIS POINT WILL DOUBTLESS BE. CLARIFIED WHEN DISCUSSION REACHES 

ARTICLE 5 IN SOV DRAFT (DEALING WITH RETURN OF ASTRONAUTS)* 

IN VIEW OF THIS SITUATION AND OF REALITY THAT US WOULD PLACE 

LITTLE IF ANY DEPENDENCE ON FORMAL INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT 

TO SECURE RETURN OF SPACE HARDWARE OR DEBRIS THEREFROM, USDEL 

REQUESTS CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO DROPPING FROM A&R 

AGREEMENT ALL MENTION OF RECOVERY AND RETURN OF SPACE VEHICLES, 

OBJECTS, AND PARTS, AGREEMENT WOULD THEN BE FOCUSSED ON RESCUE 

AND RETURN OF ASTRONAUTS AS HUMAN BEINGS. THIS APPROACH WOULD 

HAVE COLLATERAL ADVANTAGE OF MOOTING DIFFICULTIES WITH JAPANESE 

ON PRELAUNCH ANNOUNCEMENT AND REGISTRATION, MOREOVER, WE MAY 

FIND, AS DEBATE PROGRESSES, WIDENING SYMPATHY WITH BLOC AND 

NON-ALIGNED CONCERN OVER SECURITY ASPECTS OF RETURNING SPACE 

VEHICLES, HUMANITARIAN ARGUMENTS FAVORING CONCLUSION OF 

TREATY RELATE TO ASTRONAUTS AND NOT TO HARDWARE, 

IF DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCIES CONCUR IN THIS APPROACH 

WHICH WE RECOMMEND, WE WOULD WISH TO EXPLORE IT PRIVATELY-- 

THROUGH CHAIRMAN LACHS OR WITH USSR DIRECTLY RATHER THAN 

START WITH PUBLIC PROPOSAL IN COMMITTEE, REQUEST REPLY AT 

EARLIEST FEASIBLE DATE. 

GP-3, GOLDBERG 

BT 

PAGE 2 OF 2 

a. 

SECRET
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Generic  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, May 01, 2024
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Road , Agrichemical Handling Facility, Anaerobic Digester, Animal Mortality Facility, Animal Trails and Walkways, Composting Facility, Constructed Wetland, Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Dike, Diversion, Dry Hydrant, Fish Raceway or Tank, Grade Stabilization Structure, Grassed Waterway, Heavy Use Area Protection, Hillside Ditch, Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Land Smoothing, Lined Waterway or Outlet, Livestock Pipeline, Mine Shaft & Adit Closing, Open Channel, Pond, Recreation Land Grading and Shaping, Rock Barrier, Roof Runoff Structure, Sediment Basin, Spoil Spreading, Spring Development, Stream Crossing, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Structure for Water Control, Subsurface Drain, Surface Drainage, Field Ditch, Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral, Terrace, Trails and Walkways, Underground Outlet, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Transfer, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Water Harvesting Catchment, Access Control, Critical Area Planting, Irrigation Water Management, Livestock Pipeline, Watering Facility.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
October 23, 2015

J.B. Taschner

2029 Century Park East Suite 400

Los Angeles

, C A 90067

Dear J.B. Taschner :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explain s why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 22 , 2015 exemption request filed in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 33 41 , but

we are unable to process your request any further

. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exempt ion

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request

.

For more detailed information relating to submitting pet itions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html

. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst, A irmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
# Alley Cropping (Ac.) (311) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Alley Cropping (Ac.) (311) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Alley Cropping (Ac.) (311) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our FOTG website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Alley Cropping (Ac.) (311) (10/17) Standard Document(61.12 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Alley Cropping Conservation Practice Overview(171 KB)

Alley Cropping Conservation Practice Physical Effects Worksheet(26.49 KB)

Alley Cropping Network Effects Diagram(92.46 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09229**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09229\09229_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09229\09229_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09229\09229_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09229\09229_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09229\09229_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09229\09229_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09229\09229_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09229\9229_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09229\Certification Statement Plant ID 09229.pdf Plant certification statement 09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant certification statement x 09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09229\Supplemental Documents\09229_PartA_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
  (1)
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the report.
 Date: December 20, 2005/s/ David HirschhornDavid Hirschhorn
Co-Chief Executive Officer (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Co-Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material Security

# Export and Import of Radioactive Byproduct Material

The NRC is responsible for licensing and regulating the export and import of nuclear equipment and material as set forth in Part 110 of Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations*. The following pages describe recent developments in the agency's efforts to ensure the safe import and export of radioactive byproduct material.

Changes to the Export and Import Rule. Changes to the regulations in Part 110 have enabled the NRC to enhance control, accountability, and security of sources of greatest concern.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Category 3 Source Security and Accountability Re-Evaluation
          - Cyber Security for Radioactive Byproduct Materials Licensees
          - Export and Import of Radioactive Byproduct Material
          - Integrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)
          - Response to 2019 GAO Materials Security Audit
          - Security Orders and Requirements
          - Task Force on Radiation Source Protection and Security
          - 10 CFR Part 37—Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material
          - 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            Export-Import. The NRC Office of International Programs' page describing the NRC's licensing authority for export and import licenses, along with the types of licenses issued, associated fees, and related information.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 205 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 

of genetically engineered fish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require labeling of genetically engineered fish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, 

4 AND COSMETIC ACT REGARDING GENETI5 CALLY ENGINEERED SALMON. 

6 Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

7 Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is further amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 205 IH

1 ‘‘(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless 

2 the food bears a label stating that the food contains ge3 netically engineered fish.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0380 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MARY DARLEAN WRIGHT ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including March 2 5 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 9 2023

02/09/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0380