alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

We have issued our reports dated April 12, 2000 on The North Face (Europe)
Limited financial statements for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999, which accompany the consolidated financial statements of The
North Face, Inc. appearing in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our December 31, 1999 report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph referring to the substantial doubt of the ability of The
North Face (Europe) Limited to continue as a going concern. We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-58629 and
333-70405 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-12243 and 333-12633
on Form S-8 of The North Face, Inc. of the aforementioned reports on The North
Face (Europe) Limited dated April 12, 2000.

GRANT THORNTON

Glasgow, Scotland
April 13, 2000
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter
63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. (SRI), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of SRI on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of SRI.



|                     |  |     |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ D. Jon McGuire                      
|                     |  |     |  | D. Jon McGuire                          
|                     |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President of Strategic Sourcing



|                     |  |     |  |                                               
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Wallace D. Ruiz                           
|                     |  |     |  | Wallace D. Ruiz                               
|                     |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Crop Rotation, Contour Farming, Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Water Management, Nutrient Management

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  as of and for the year ended March 31, 2000  included  herein and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1000

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    200
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                571,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                        110,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        485,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                               329,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                            137,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          485,322
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       25,817
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           7,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        6,438 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      6,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         3,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     3,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            3,517
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.28
<FN>
<F1> Depreciation and amortization
</FN>


</TABLE>
Conservation Practice Overview 

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

October 2017 

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Stripcropping (Code 585) 

Stripcropping is growing crops in a systematic 

arrangement of strips in a field to reduce soil erosion, 

reduce particulate emissions into the air, and improve 

water quality.

Practice Information

This practice is used on cropland and certain

recreation and wildlife lands where field crops are 

grown. The crops are arranged so that a strip of

grass or close-growing crop is alternated with a clean 

tilled strip or a strip with less protective cover. 

Generally, the strip widths are equal across the field. On sloping land where sheet and rill erosion are 

a concern, the strips are laid out on the contour or across the general slope. Where wind erosion is a 

concern, the strips are laid out as close to perpendicular as possible to the prevailing erosive wind 

direction.

In addition to its primary purpose of reducing soil erosion and improving water quality, the practice is

also effective in increasing infiltration and available soil water, and improving wildlife habitat.

Common Associated Practices 

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Stripcropping (Code 585) is commonly applied with CPSs

Conservation Crop Rotation (Code 328), Cover Crop (Code 340), Residue and Tillage Management

(Codes 329 and 345), Nutrient Management (Code 590), Integrated Pest Management (Code 595),

and Grassed Waterway (Code 412).

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02128]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 February 2015, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#453631242323052623246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91e2e5f0f7f7d1f2f7f0bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: 28 January 2015, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02128 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2










Chief
Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002







In
connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen J. Gilhooly, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.








Date:   March
      17, 2008
            /s/
      Stephen J. GilhoolyStephen
      J. Gilhooly
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer












A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by
TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2004273EN.01001003.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Finanzgericht Köln by order of that court of 15 July 2004 in the case of REWE Zentralfinanz e.G., as universal legal successor of ITS Reisen GmbH against Finanzamt Köln-Mitte

(Case C-347/04)

(2004/C 273/21)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Köln (Finance Court, Cologne) (Germany) of 15 July 2004, received at the Court Registry on 13 August 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of REWE Zentralfinanz e.G., as universal legal successor of ITS Reisen GmbH against Finanzamt Köln-Mitte on the following question:

| — | Are Article 52 (now Article 43) in conjunction with Article 58 (now Article 48) and Articles 67-73 and 73b et seq. (now Article 56 et seq.) of the EC Treaty to be interpreted as precluding a rule which — like the rule laid down in Paragraph 2a(1)(3)(a) and Paragraph 2a(2) of the Einkommensteuergesetz which is at issue in the main proceedings — restricts the immediate tax set-off of losses stemming from write-downs to the book value of subsidiaries in other EC countries, where those subsidiaries pursue passive activities within the meaning of the national provision and/or where the subsidiaries pursue active activities within the meaning of the national provision only through their own second-tier subsidiaries, whilst write-downs to the book value of domestic subsidiaries are possible without these restrictions? |
| --- | --- |

—

Are Article 52 (now Article 43) in conjunction with Article 58 (now Article 48) and Articles 67-73 and 73b et seq. (now Article 56 et seq.) of the EC Treaty to be interpreted as precluding a rule which — like the rule laid down in Paragraph 2a(1)(3)(a) and Paragraph 2a(2) of the Einkommensteuergesetz which is at issue in the main proceedings — restricts the immediate tax set-off of losses stemming from write-downs to the book value of subsidiaries in other EC countries, where those subsidiaries pursue passive activities within the meaning of the national provision and/or where the subsidiaries pursue active activities within the meaning of the national provision only through their own second-tier subsidiaries, whilst write-downs to the book value of domestic subsidiaries are possible without these restrictions?

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John A. Roberts, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ John A. Roberts                         
|--------------------------------------------
|John A. Roberts                             
|Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|November 14, 2003
NO. 13-10-00650-CR

MIGUEL ANGEL AGUILERA § IN THE COURT OF

§

VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes, MIGUEL ANGEL AGUILERA, Appellant in the above styled and numbered

cause, and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file a petition for discretionary review, and

for good cause shows the following:

I.

On November 234 2015, the 13th Court of Appeals affirmed Appellant's conviction. See, 

MIGUEL ANGEL AGUILERA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Tr. Ct. No. 13-CR-1492-B

II. 

Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause is due on, August 20, 2012.

Counsel respectfully requests 30 days from the presently scheduled deadline to file Appellant’s

petition. 

 III.

As reason for this request, Counsel states he is currently working on the following 

appeals: USA v. Kristopher Michael Montemayor, 15-40197 Fifth Circuit

 USA v. Obed Torres-Hernandez, 15-41654 Fifth Circuit

USA v. Guillero Herrera, 15-40654

Antonio Santos v. States of Texas, 13-15-00353-CR

 Kevin Lozano v. State of Texas, 13-15-00513-CR

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel for Appellant respectfully

requests an extension of 45 days, until Jan 31, 2015, to file a petition for discretionary review. 

The additional time is needed because I have spent the last two weeks determine whether the

13th Court of Appeals might reconsider its opinion. As there is a paucity of 13th Court of

1

PD-1636-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/17/2015 11:44:59 AM

Accepted 12/19/2015 9:01:14 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Appeals case law on the issues involved in this case, and as that Court seems to be reluctant to

publish its own opinions so as to provide guidance to the courts, and counsel, I have concluded

that it would be fruitless to file a request for a rehearing. Additionally, I do not do that simply

because I want more time. Outside of that, these are the holidays, for one. And, I am now going

to write my client to find out if he wishes for me to write the PDR or if he wishes to do it

himself. I will send him a simply post card to respond quickly. However, the mails are a bit

slower during these days. Hence, realistically, not much is going to happen the next two weeks.

I would very sincerely appreciate the additional time. 

Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of Philip Cowen

500 E. Levee Street

Brownsville, Texas 78520

Tel. 956-541-6031

Fax 956-541-6872

email: ptchb@att.net

____/s/_________

Philip T. Cowen

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on Dec. 17, 2012, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Cameron County, 974 E. Harrison St.,

Brownsville, Texas 78520, by regular mail.

____/s/_________

Philip T. Cowen

2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 21, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 21, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0442. MICHAEL WASHER v. JANELLE HERNANDEZ.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV274782
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

 

Date July 16th 2003

 

 
| **Loan Amount** | **:** | $                                              |
|-----------------|-------|------------------------------------------------|
| **Due**         | **:** | 7/16/05 *(Two years  from above date of note)* |

#  

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, AMLCommunications, Inc. promises to pay “Party” the sum of $                ,with interest at the rate of eight (8) per cent per year.

 

Interest is to be paidquarterly in arrears in the sum of $                ,with principal payable in total on 7/16/05.

 

Note is pre-payable inany amount, without penalty at any time.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jacob Inbar           |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Jacob Inbar               |
|   | President & CEO       |
|   | AML Communications,  Inc. |

 

----
#### - v. Administrators of Richard Kenon.

The objection that a joint obligor is not sued, must be made by plea in abatement at the proper time : it cannot be made at the trial of the cause. Such a plea cannot be made at all since the act oi'1789, *Rev.*c. 314, *s*4.

Debt, *non est factum,*payment and set off pleaded *;*aud upon the production of the bond, it was objected that tiie other obligor named in the bond, is alive and not sued.

*Per curiam,*

the Defend nt ought to have pleaded that in •abatement, if he supposed it would have been of any advantage to *him;*for by pleading over to the aoli.m, he has admitted himself to be a lawful Defendant Where-ever a plea is pleaded, which according to the order of pleading, is subsequent to another which might have been of advantage had if been pleaded at the proper time, he thereby waives the matter that was-proper to be exhibited in that formei pica, otherwise, there would be the greatest, confusion in trials at law. The Plaintiff would constantly be turned round upon objections he did not expect, and of course not prepared to combat. It would also he productive óf a great waste of time, aere ¡he court and jury to take up every objection which might he made through every stage of the proceeding, and endeavor t-i asem-min its reality — the rules of pleading pave. been formed with great tvisdom, and with a view to the prevention of (hese mischiefs, and if observed the parties will never suffer injustice, at the same time that the weight of the «hole cause will he ralun-d to one or Uvo points, of which both parties are apprized by the pleadings. This '.hjectioo therefore catino' he taken upo» these issues. *Gilb. Law Evid.*168. Co. *Litl.*283 a._ 1 *Rep.*119. ARo, tins objection is not good for another reason. 1789, c. 57, directs tint in all cases of joint obligations or assurup'ion.s ot co-partners or others, entered into after the passing of that act, might be sued upon in the same manner as if they were joint. and several, and *248this is a joint obligation entered into after the passing of that act.* The Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment.

Note. Upon the. first, point see 1 *Saund.*291, notes. As to the other point see note to *Brown, Campbell*& Co. v. *Clary & Craig, Adm'rs. ante*107.
#### Revels, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Alexander Wiley*of Chippewa Falls.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents City of Bloomer and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilke & Toebaas*and *L. E. Hart,*attorneys, all of Madison, and *Sexton, Mor daunt, Kennedy & Carroll*and *Robert J. Tyr-rell*of counsel, all of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0429

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW LYMAN TIPPETS,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pur suant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Donald L. Harris , D istrict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2022

03/30/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0429