alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004272EN.01000602.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3557 — IPR/MITSUI/MEC)

(2004/C 272/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 October 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3557. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3557. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2050

TOMMIE E. BECTOR, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARTE HANKS MARKETING,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

2462-AMD)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommie E. Bector, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Neal Cormac Baroody,

STANLEY, BAROODY, O’TOOLE & AHN, Baltimore, Maryland; Lisa May

Evans, SANTEN & HUGHES, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tommie E. Bector, Jr., filed an untimely notice of appeal. We

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The

only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court

extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on June 12, 1998;

Bector’s notice of appeal was filed on July 16, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Bector’s failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffRefining And Characterizing Heat Release Rates From Electrical Enclosures During Fire (RACHELLE-FIRE

# Refining And Characterizing Heat Release Rates From Electrical Enclosures During Fire (RACHELLE-FIRE) — Volume 2: Fire Modeling Guidance for Electrical Cabinets, Electric motors, Indoor Dry Transformers, and the Main Control Board (NUREG-2178, Volume 2, EPRI 3002016052)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG–2178, Volume 2 (PDF – 26.83 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2019**Date Published:** June 2020

EPRI Project ManagerA. Lindeman

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)3420 Hillview AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94304-1338

U.S. NRC-RES Project ManagerM. H. Salley

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES)Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

NUREG–2178 Volume 1 refined the heat release rates (HRRs) associated with electrical cabinets and introduced an obstructed fire plume model for refining the vertical zone of influence (ZOI). As a result, Volume 1 has been implemented in a number of nuclear power plant fire probabilistic risk assessments to obtain a more realistic estimate of risk associated with electrical cabinet fires. Although the methodology in Volume 1 is focused on data analysis and the ZOI, it was realized that modeling refinements associated with other aspects of cabinet fires and other electrical ignition sources should be investigated. These targeted areas are further investigated in this report.

This report describes improved methods that will increase the realism in the modeling of selected ignition sources. The areas further investigated include the treatment of flame radiation and obstructed radiation, fire propagation between adjacent electrical cabinets, HRRs for electric motors and dry transformers, fire location factor, and the modeling of the main control board.

**Keywords**Fire probabilistic risk assessmentFire modelingFire Dynamics SimulatorHeat release rateObstructed fire plumeZone of influence

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2060 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2060

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
transition youth as members of targeted groups for purposes of the work 
                          opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

  Mr. Reichert (for himself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, and Mr. 
    Reed) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include foster care 
transition youth as members of targeted groups for purposes of the work 
                          opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improved Employment Outcomes for 
Foster Youth Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FOSTER CARE TRANSITION YOUTH FOR PURPOSES OF WORK 
              OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (I), by 
striking the period at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ``, 
or'', and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) a qualified foster care transition youth.''.
    (b) Qualified Foster Care Transition Youth Defined.--Section 51(d) 
of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(16) Qualified foster care transition youth.--The term 
        `qualified foster care transition youth' means any individual 
        who is certified by the designated local agency as--
                    ``(A) not having attained age 27 as of the hiring 
                date, and
                    ``(B) having been in foster care (within the 
                meaning of section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 
                U.S.C. 677)), after attaining the age specified in 
                subsection (a)(7) of such section.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to individuals who begin work for the employer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating
Partnership”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





(i)the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Operating Partnership.








Date:  August
      1, 2008
            /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.Frank
      C. Marchisello, Jr.
              Vice
      President, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust, Sole
      General Partner of the Registrant
# C_2004290EN.01000901.xml

| 27.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/9

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/B/6/03

OPEN COMPETITION

(2004/C 290/07)

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS (B5/B4)

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS

IN THE FIELDS OF PRODUCTION COORDINATION AND PROOF-READING

IN THE FIELDS OF PRODUCTION COORDINATION AND PROOF-READING

| Chairman: | Jean-Pascal RIHOUX |
| --- | --- |
| Alternate Chairman: | Jorge TIENDA LÓPEZ |
| Full members: | Tomás COLINO ÁLVAREZ
  Manuel PEREIRA DA SILVA |

Chairman:

Jean-Pascal RIHOUX

Alternate Chairman:

Jorge TIENDA LÓPEZ

Full members:

Tomás COLINO ÁLVAREZ

Manuel PEREIRA DA SILVA

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                      40,797,316
<SECURITIES>                                   531,415
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,734,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (926,900)
<INVENTORY>                                 20,258,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,058,449
<PP&E>                                       5,952,107
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,853,361)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,894,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,864,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    98,190,574
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,160,433)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,894,701
<SALES>                                     69,618,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,618,567
<CGS>                                       48,853,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,853,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,691,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (808,295)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,881,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,562,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,318,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,318,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Final Environmental Statement: Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2(NUREG-0498, Supplement 2) – Final Report

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0498	           - Supplement 2, Volume 1 – Introduction through Chapter 9 (PDF – 19.14 MB) 
          - Supplement 2, Volume 2 – Appendices (PDF – 32.23 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: **May 2013**Date Published:**May 2013

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) prepared this supplemental final environmental statement in response to the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) application for a facility operating license. The proposed action requested is for the NRC to issue an operating license for a second light-water nuclear reactor at the Watts Bar Nuclear (WBN) Plant in Rhea County, Tennessee.

TVA received construction permits (CPs) for two units at the WBN site and began construction in 1973. In 1978, the NRC issued a final environmental statement related to the operating license for WBN Units 1 and 2. On March 4, 2009, the NRC received an update to the application from TVA for a facility operating license to possess, use, and operate WBN Unit 2. The NRC published the notice of the receipt of application and the opportunity for hearing in the Federal Register on May 1, 2009. NRC regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 51.92, "Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement," require the NRC staff to prepare a supplement to the final environmental statement if there are substantial changes in the proposed action relevant to environmental concerns or if there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts. The same regulation permits the NRC staff to prepare a supplement when, in its opinion, preparation of a supplement will further the interests of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

This supplement documents the NRC staff’s environmental review related to the operating license for WBN Unit 2. The NRC staff evaluated a full scope of environmental topics, including land and water use, air quality and meteorology, terrestrial and aquatic ecology, radiological and nonradiological impacts on humans and the environment, historic and cultural resources, socioeconomics, and environmental justice. The NRC staff’s evaluations are based on (1) the application submitted by TVA, including the environmental report and previous environmental impact statements and historical documents, (2) consultation with other Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies, (3) the NRC staff’s independent review, and (4) the NRC staff’s consideration of comments related to the environmental review received during the public scoping process.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2016193DE.01012001.xml

| 19.7.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 193/120 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 193/120

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/2047 der Kommission vom 16. November 2015 zur Erneuerung der Genehmigung des Wirkstoffs Esfenvalerat als Substitutionskandidat gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und zur Änderung des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 300 vom 17. November 2015
  )

Seite 11, Anhang I sechste Spalte („Sonderbestimmungen“), erster Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

| „— | das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorgansimen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation im Rahmen der Lebensmittelkette;“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorgansimen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation im Rahmen der Lebensmittelkette;“

muss es heißen:

| „— | das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorganismen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation in der Nahrungskette;“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorganismen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation in der Nahrungskette;“.

Seite 12, Anhang II Nummer 2 zur Einfügung des Eintrags zu Esfenvalerat in Teil E des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011, siebte Spalte („Sonderbestimmungen“), erster Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

| „— | das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorgansimen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation im Rahmen der Lebensmittelkette;“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorgansimen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation im Rahmen der Lebensmittelkette;“

muss es heißen:

| „— | das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorganismen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation in der Nahrungskette;“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

das Risiko, das von Esfenvalerat und dem 2SαR-Isomer von Fenvalerat für Wasserorganismen ausgeht, einschließlich des Risikos der Bioakkumulation in der Nahrungskette;“.

---
# C_2004300EN.01005601.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/56

---

Correction to the Official Journal notice in Case C-310/01

(Official Journal of the European Union C 55 of 8 March 2003)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 55 of 8 March 2003)

(2004/C 300/109)

In the Official Journal notice in Case C-310/01 Comune di Udine, Azienda Multiservizi SpA (AMGA) and Diddi Dino Figli Srl, Associazione Nazionale Imprese Gestione servizi tecnici integrati (AGESI), the text should be replaced by the following:

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 14 November 2002

(reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato): Comune di Udine, Azienda Multiservizi SpA (AMGA) and Diddi Dino Figli Srl, Associazione Nazionale Imprese Gestione servizi tecnici integrati (AGESI) (1)

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Question to which the answer may be clearly deduced from the case-law - Directive 92/50/EEC - Public contracts concerning both products and services - Value of the products greater than that of the services - Application of Directive 93/36/EEC)

(2003/C 55/50)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-310/01: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Comune di Udine, Azienda Multiservizi SpA (AMGA) and Diddi Dino Figli Srl, Associazione Nazionale Imprese Gestione servizi tecnici integrati (AGESI) — on the interpretation of Articles 1(b), 2 and 6 of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward and S. von Bahr, Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 11 November 2002, in which it has ruled:

Article 2 of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that that directive does not apply to a public contract which concerns both products within the meaning of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts and services within the meaning of Directive 92/50 if the value of the products included in the contract is greater than that of the services provided.

Directive 93/36 applies to such a contract unless the contracting authority exercises over the supplier a control which is similar to that which it exercises over its own departments and the supplier carries out the essential parts of its activities with the controlling contracting authority or authorities.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 13.10.2001.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 14, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 14, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A0537. CAROL A. LUCE v. THE FORD PLANTATION CLUB, INC..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
# C_2004239EN.01001004.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/10

---

Removal from the register of Case C-534/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/21)

By order of 11 June 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-534/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                                



                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------


                                                            Jurisdiction of
     Company                                                 Organization
     -------                                                -------------
                                       
W&L Services Corp.                                          North Carolina
                                       
Best Way Motor Lines, Inc.                                  North Carolina
                                       
W&L Motor Lines, Inc.                                       North Carolina
                                       
CMS Transportation Services, Inc.                           Georgia
                                       
Scales Transport Corporation                                Georgia
                                       
Scales Leasing Company, Inc.                                Georgia
                                       
AmeriTruck Refrigerated Transport, Inc.                     Georgia
                                       
KTL, Inc.                                                   Florida
                                       
AmeriTruck Logistics Services, Inc.                         Delaware
                                       
AmeriTruck Equipment Corp.                                  Delaware
                                       
AmeriTruck Operations Services, Inc.                        Delaware
                                       
Ameri-Truck, Ltd., Inc.                                     Ohio