alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Review of Accident Tolerant Fuel Concepts with Implications to Severe Accident Progression and Radiological Releases (NUREG/CR-7282, ERI/NRC 21-203)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7282 (PDF – 1.50 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2021**Date Published:** July 2021

**Prepared by:**Mohsen Khatib-Rahbar, Alfred Krall, Zhe Yuan, and Michael ZaviscaEnergy Research, Inc.P.O. Box 2034Rockville, MD 20847-2034S. Campbell, NRC Project ManagerOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, August 30, 2021
#### The State, *v.*Jonathan Caffey.

From Iredell.

indictment. An indictment for perjury in swearing to an affidavit, charged that the affidavit was in *substance*and to the effect following” — The assignments was that defendant swore he did not know a writ was returned ag-ainst hint in the above *suit*— the affidavit when produced had the word *case*instead of suit: — the variance is immaterial, the indictment does not profess to give the *tenor.*

The Defendant was indicted for Perjury, alleged to have been committed in swearing to an affidavit. The assignment of the perjury was, that the Defendant swore that he did not know ‘that a writ was returned against Mm in the above *suit.*The evidence offered in support of the assignment, was an affidavit, in which the Defendant had sworn, that he did not know that a writ was returned against him in the above case. The indictment charged that the affidavit was “ in substance and to the effect following, &c. Upon the trial, the Defendant’s counsel objected to the giving of the affidavit in evidence, on the ground that it was variant in its language from the one recited in the indictment. The objection was overruled, and the Defendant convicted. A rule for a new trial was obtained, and sent to this Court.

*321Seaweix, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A new trial is moved for, on the ground that the aífi-davit was improperly admitted *•,*and it has been insisted, that inasmuch as the assignment and affidavit differ in a *word,*the assignment was not supported by the evidence *;*and the case from Cowper (a) has been relied on, where Lord Mansfield says, “ the true distinction is, that when the word misrecitcd is *sensible,*then it is fatal.” This case only implies where the *tenor*is undertaken to be recited j in which, if the recital be variant in a word or letter so as thereby to *create a different word,*it is fatal. In the present case, the indictment only pretends to set forth the *substance*and *effect*of the affidavit ; and ail the authorities shew that whenever a statement of the substance and effect is sufficient in the prececdings, evidence of the substance and effect will also suffice. Lord Holt, in the case of the Queen vs. Dr. Drake, (b) by way of illustration says, that when only the sense and meaning are professed to be set out, it may be done by translating it into Latin. The evidence was properly admitted, and the rule for a new trial must be discharged.

(a)

 Rex vs. Beach 229.

(b)

*2*Salk. 661.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Brush Management, Critical Area Planting, Firebreak, Forest Stand Improvement, Forest Trails and Landings, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Sediment Basin, Structure for Water Control, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72431) pertaining to the AVTEAM, Inc. 1996 Stock
Option Plan of our reports dated February 12, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of AVTEAM, Inc. included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
April 21, 1999
# C_2004181EN.01S00301.xml

| 14.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 15 July 2004, in the Official Journal of the European Union C 182 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 11th supplement to the 22nd complete edition’ and ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Fifth supplement to the 22nd complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

Image

---
[Cite as State v. McMahon , 2014-Ohio-4707.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2013-CA-55 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Ca se No. 2006-CR-685 v. : : AARON E. MCMAHON : (Criminal Appeal from : ( Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant : :

. . . . . . . . . . . O P I N I O N Rendered on the 24th da y of October, 2014.

. . . . . . . . . . . RYAN A. SAUNDERS, Atty. Reg. No. 0091678, Assi stant Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, 50 East Columbia Street, 4 th Floor, Springfield, Ohio 45502 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee J. ALLEN WILMES, Atty. Reg. No. 0012093, 7821 North Dixie Drive, Dayton, Ohio 45414 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant

. . . . . . . . . . . . . FAIN, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Aa ron E. McMahon appeals from his sentences for Receiving Stolen Property and for Attempted Having a Weapon While Under a Disability, 2

 imposed following the revocation of community control sanctions. McMa hon contends that the trial court erred by orde ring the sentences to be served c onsecutively, without having made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). {¶ 2} The State acknowledges that the consecu tive sentences were imposed without the statutory findings having been ma de, but argues that this app eal is moot, because McMahon has served his prison sentences, and has been releas ed from post-release control. We agree. Accordingly, this appeal is Dismissed.

I. The Course of Proceedings {¶ 3} In trial court case no. 2006-CR-685, McMahon pled gu ilty to one count of Receiving Stolen Property; ot her counts were dismissed. In trial court case no. 2006-CR-948, McMahon pled guilty to one count of Attempted Having a Wea pon While Under a Disability. Community control sanctions were imposed as the se ntence for both offenses. {¶ 4} In 2013, McMahon admitted to having viol ated the terms of his community control sanctions. The tr ial court imposed 17-month prison term s for both offenses, to be served consecutively. The trial court also recomme nded McMahon for a risk reduction sentence under R.C. 2929.143. {¶ 5} McMahon appeals, setting forth as his sole assignment of error:
THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED PREJUDICIAL ERROR BY FAILING TO MAKE THE MANDATED APPROPRIATE STATUTORY FINDINGS. 3

 II. McMahon’s Appeal Is Moot {¶ 6} The State asserts, and McMahon does not dispute, that he was released from prison on December 5, 2013, was placed on post-re lease control, and was released from post-release control on April 7, 2014. {¶ 7} McMahon is not seeking relief from his c onvictions. They will remain intact even if his sole assignment of error is sustai ned. He only seeks relief from his prison sentence. We cannot give him relief from his prison sentence, because he has already completed serving it, including post-release cont rol. Accordingly, this appeal is moot. State v. Erdman , 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25814, 2014-Ohio-2997, ¶ 4.

III. Conclusion {¶ 8} This appeal is Dismissed, as moot.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . HALL and WELBAUM, JJ., concur.

Copies mailed to: Ryan A. Saunders J. Allen Wilmes Hon. Richard J. O’Neill
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Natural Circulation Flows in a Pressurized-Water Reactor Loop under Severe Accident Conditions (NUREG-1922)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1922 (PDF - 1.30 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: ** February 2010**Date Published: ** March 2010

**Prepared by:**C.F. Boyd and K.W. Armstrong

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics is used to predict the natural circulation flows between a simplified reactor vessel and the steam generator of a pressurized-water reactor (PWR) during a severe accident scenario. The results extend earlier predictions of steam generator inlet plenum mixing with the inclusion of the entire natural circulation loop between the reactor vessel upper plenum and the steam generator. Tube leakage and mass flow into the pressurizer surge line are also considered. The predictions are utilized as a numerical experiment to improve the basis for simplified models applied in one-dimensional system codes that are used during the prediction of severe accident natural circulation flows. An updated inlet plenum mixing model is proposed that accounts for mixing in the hot leg too. The new model is consistent with the predicted behavior and accounts for flow into a side mounted surge line if present. A densitybased Froude number correlation is utilized to provide a method for determining the flow rate from the vessel to the hot leg directly from the conditions at the ends of the hot leg pipe. This provides a physically based approach for establishing the hot leg flows. The mixing parameters and correlations are proposed as a best-estimate approach for estimating the flow rates and mixing in one-dimensional system codes applied to severe accident natural circulation conditions. Sensitivity studies demonstrate the applicability of the approach over a range of conditions. The predictions are most sensitive to changes in the steam generator secondary side temperatures or heat transfer rates to the steam generator. Grid independence is demonstrated through comparisons with previous models and by increasing the number of cells in the model. A further modeling improvement is suggested regarding the application of thermal entrance effects in the hot leg and surge line. This work supports the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission studies of steam generator tube integrity under severe accident conditions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.E.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
                           EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION
                             1995 COMPENSATION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

         Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the El Paso Energy Corporation 1995
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated effective as
of August 1, 1998 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective
February 7, 2001:

         WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation of El Paso Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was amended to change the name of the
corporation to El Paso Corporation effective February 7, 2001.

         NOW THEREFORE, the name of the Plan is hereby changed to the "El Paso
Corporation 1995 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors" and all
references in the Plan to "El Paso Energy Corporation" or the "Company" shall
mean "El Paso Corporation."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 7th day of February 2001.


                                       EL PASO CORPORATION

                                       By:      /s/ Joel Richards III
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Human Resources and Administration

Attest:

   /s/ David L. Siddall
-----------------------------
   Corporate Secretary
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-11492, File No. 333-36785, File No. 333-37420 and File No. 333­-70951) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-08249, File No. 333-08251, File No. 333-30854, File No. 333-30926, File No. 333-55316, File No. 333-66903 and File No. 333-70947) of Wilhelmina International, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2010, which appears on page 29 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  /s/ BURTON MCCUMBER & CORTEZ, L.L.P.
  Brownsville, Texas
 March 31, 2010
# C_2004222EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 September 2004

(2004/C 222/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2175 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6799 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,137 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,534 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,66 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3115 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5773 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,655 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,659 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4275 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4319 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 917 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,99 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,125 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 833 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,745 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5802 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4955 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,862 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0712 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0371 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2175

JPY

Japanese yen

132,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6799

SEK

Swedish krona

9,137

CHF

Swiss franc

1,534

ISK

Iceland króna

87,66

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3115

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5773

CZK

Czech koruna

31,655

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,659

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4275

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4319

ROL

Romanian leu

40 917

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,99

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,125

TRL

Turkish lira

1 833 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,745

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5802

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4955

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,862

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0712

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,31

ZAR

South African rand

8,0371

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Soil Taxonomy

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Soil Taxonomy 

The second edition of *Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys* is the result of the collective experience and contributions of thousands of pedologists from around the world.

NRCS maintains and provides leadership for amending Soil Taxonomy and for maintaining the soil series classification data. All soil surveys within the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) must use Soil Taxonomy. Soil surveys use Soil Taxonomy to provide:
              - A connotative naming system that enables those users familiar with the nomenclature to remember selected properties of soils.
              - A means for understanding the relationships among soils within a given area and in different areas.
              - A means of communicating concepts of soils and soil properties.
              - A means of projecting experience with soils from one area to another.
              - Names that can be used as reference terms to identify soil map unit components.

Soil Taxonomy.pdf(24.45 MB)

Errata Sheet for Soil Taxonomy(8.24 KB)

A printed copy is available from:

NRCS Distribution CenterEnter keywords: soil taxonomy 2nd editionPhone: 888-526-3227E-mail: NRCSDistributionCenter@ia.usda.gov

##   Additional Documents

How to submit a taxonomy proposal(90.93 KB)

A Glossary of Terms Used in Soil Survey and Soil Classification(449.1 KB)

A Summary of the Contributions of the International Committees for Revising Soil Taxonomy(454.81 KB)

----

## Recommended Citation

*Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.*

##   Related Content

### Keys to Soil Taxonomy

Taxonomic keys for field classification.
Learn More

### The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy

Descriptions and distribution maps of the twelve soil orders.
Learn More

### Guide to Pronouncing Taxonomic Terms

This guide presents a list of terms (in alphabetical order) that are used in Soil Taxonomy along with other terms used to describe soils. 
Learn More

##   Contact Soils

Please contact us if you see something that needs to be updated, if you have any questions, or if you need accessibility assistance.
                  -    Soils Webmaster 
                  -    402-437-5499 
                  -    Soils-Webmaster@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# ConsolidatedGuidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance about 10 CFR Part 36 Irradiator Licenses (NUREG-1556, Volume 6, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 6, Revision 1 (PDF - 4.9 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2018**Date Published:**January 2018

**Prepared by:**C. C. CaseyA. GrumblesW. LeeR. RaglandR. J. Torres

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and to assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for irradiator licenses under Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 36, "Licenses and Radiation Safety Requirements for Irradiators." In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to the NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
## Swanson. Brian (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Cathy Gulliford <cathygullifordl@aol.com> Monday, August 13, 

### 2012 9:11 AM Swanson, Brian (OST) airline choice

Itravel back and forth from Phoenix, AZ. to Brainerd at least twice a year. Being able to use a Deltaconnected carrier makes a big difference to me in terms of cost and convenience. Also having the use of a sky bridge definetly helps with the carryon luggage issue. I urge you to pick SkyWest as the Brainerfeederforthose reasons. CathyGulliford cathygulliford1 @aol.com

1