alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004217EN.01001001.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 July 2004

in Case C-400/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance du VIIe arrondissement de Paris): Waterman SAS v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects (1)

e

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff heading - Pen cases)

(2004/C 217/18)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-400/03: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunal d'instance du VIIe arrondissement de Paris (France) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Waterman SAS, formerly Waterman SA, and Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects on the conformity of the Explanatory Notes for subheadings 4202 12 11 and 4202 12 19 of the Combined Nomenclature contained in the Commission's communication entitled ‘Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities’ (OJ 2000 C 199, p. 1) with the combined nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2263/2000 of 13 October 2000 (OJ 2000 L 264, p. 1) — the Court, composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 July 2004, in which it has ruled:

e

Examination of the question raised does not reveal any information such as to affect the validity of subheadings 4202 12 11 and 4202 12 19 of the Combined Nomenclature, contained in the Commission's communication entitled ‘Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities’.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael A.
Cederstrom, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Cederstrom
-------------------------------
Michael A. Cederstrom
Chief Financial Officer
December 22, 2006

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TX Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Maietta, Anthony

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:33 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Portanova, Mary; Blakley, Pamela

Subject: FW: Michigan: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Anthony Maietta

EPA Region 5

maietta.anthony@epa.gov

(312) 353

‐ 8777

From: Czerniak, George

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:31 PM

To: Portanova, Mary; Maietta, Anthony

Subject: FW: Michigan: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

From: Czerniak, George

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:22 PM

To: 'Fiedler, Lynn (DEQ)'

Subject: Michigan: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

Lynn:

This message is a follow

‐ up to my recent phone call notifying you about the final action the EPA Administrator signed

today to ensure States have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is

operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are

treated in State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action,

EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 States, including Michigan, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure

consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy. You will have 18 months to submit revisions of

your State plan to EPA. Your revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.

As part of our notification to your State about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the EPA’s

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action,

including the specific SIP provisions your State needs to address, we have posted a pre

‐ publication version of the

action on our website at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html

.

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible. If you or

your staff have questions, please contact Mary Portanova, portanova.mary@epa.gov

, (312) 353

‐ 5954.2 George

Attachment
#### Mantho, by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Millspaugh, Respondent.

For the appellant: *'Cannon & Waldron*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By. the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
*February 9, 1932.*

#### Cline, Appellant, vs. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *W. K. Parkinson*of Phillips.

For the respondent: *William T. Faricy*and *Warren New-come*of St. Paul, Minnesota, *Alfred E. Rietz*of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and *Roy P. Wilcox*of Eau Claire.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed. •

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on February 9, 1932.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

R.D.L.,

Petitioner

v.

J.T.M.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 40 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-126656, Form S-3 No. 333-122055, Form S-3 No. 333-63918, Form S-3 No. 333-40451, Form S-8 No.333-37537, Form S-3 No. 333-78061, Form S-8 No. 333-82513, Form S-8 No. 333-44326 and Form S-3 No.333-49418) of Arden Realty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses ofour reports dated March 9,2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Arden Realty, Inc., Arden Realty,Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Arden Realty, Inc. included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPLos Angeles, California
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2021

No. 04-21-00015-CV

Eric PASANISI and Tanganyika Wildlife Safari, Ltd.,

Appellants

v.

Mark VANHAM and Klineburger Vanham International Hunting Consultants, LLC.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-08521

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED. 

Appellants’ brief is due on or before April 21, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### State, Plaintiff, vs. Andrews, Defendant.

*December 11, 193*1

January *12, 1932.*

*616The matter was set down for argument. The defendant filed no brief and made no appearance in this court.

*Spencer Haven*of Hudson, attorney for plaintiff, and counsel for the Board of State Bar Commissioners, for the plaintiff.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The character of the charges is indicated with sufficient particularity in the recommendations of the referee and we do not find it necessary in this case to set them out in detail. The circumstances in this case clearly established by the proof are difficult to understand and are incomprehensible to the members of the court *617who have known the defendant personally. It cannot be otherwise than that some disintegrating influence has operated upon defendant’s life and broken down his standards not only of professional conduct but his moral standards as well. In this as in many other cases the principal sufferer will be the innocent family of the defendant, but that fact, while it may appeal to our sympathy, affords the court no excuse for a failure to perform its duty. Under the circumstances it is considered that the recommendations of the referee must be confirmed.

*By the Court.*— It is ordered and adjudged that the name of the defendant be, and the same is hereby, stricken from the roll of attorneys of this court, and the license to practice law heretofore granted to him be, and the same is hereby, revoked, and he is ordered and required to desist from the practice of law in this state.
GAYLA R. MAY CSR, RPR

27th Judicial District Court

P. O. Box 747

Belton, TX 76513

(254) 933-5270

November 17, 2016

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third District of Texas 

Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

RE: Trial Court No. 72,147; Wilfred Warren Sheppard Vs. The State of Texas;

 27th District Court, Bell County, TX; Case No. 03-16-00702-CR

RE: Trial Court No. 75,259; Anthony Dwayne Holmes, Jr. Vs. The State of 

 Texas; 27th District Court, Bell County, TX; Case No. 03-16-00741-CR

 

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In reference to the above-captioned appeals, I received notice of both appeals the beginning of 

November and both appeals are due November 18, 2016. Because of a very heavy docket the 

rest of the year and other transcripts, I am requesting an extension of time until January 15 in 

order to have both Reporter's Records filed.

Thank you,

Gayla R. May

27th District Court

Official Court Reporter

Bell - Lampasas Counties
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at the University of Wisconsin--Madison by 
the Division of Materials Research (DMR) #1203

Dates and Times: April 26, 2015; 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
April 27, 2015; 7:00 a.m.-8:30 p.m.
April 28, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

Place: University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Type Of Meeting: Part Open.

Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker, Program Director, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.

Purpose Of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations concerning 
further support of the MRSEC at the University of Wisconsin.

Agenda: 

Sunday, April 26, 2015

7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed--Briefing of panel

Monday, April 27, 2015

7:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Open--Review of the MRSEC
5:00 p.m.-6:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
7:00 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open--Dinner

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

7:30 a.m.-10:10 a.m. Open--Review of the MRSEC
10:10 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

Reason For Closing: The work being reviewed may include information of 
a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; 
financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 
U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 3, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-02384 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TIB FINANCIAL CORP.
KEY LARGO, FLORIDA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
21, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TIB Financial
Corp. and subsidiaries included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002, and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
pertaining to the TIB Financial Corp. Incentive Stock Option Plan and
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan as Amended.

                                      /s/   BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
                                      ----------------------
                                      BDO Seidman, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 24, 2003
# C_2004187EN.01001001.xml

| 22.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 July 2004

(2004/C 187/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2296 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4371 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66730 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1815 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5337 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58240 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,438 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,94 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6601 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4262 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4667 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 107 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9200 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,850 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 786 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7030 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6222 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5908 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8936 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1039 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 425,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3906 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2296

JPY

Japanese yen

134,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4371

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66730

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1815

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5337

ISK

Iceland króna

87,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58240

CZK

Czech koruna

31,438

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,94

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6601

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4262

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4667

ROL

Romanian leu

41 107

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9200

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,850

TRL

Turkish lira

1 786 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7030

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6222

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5908

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8936

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1039

KRW

South Korean won

1 425,17

ZAR

South African rand

7,3906

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
AAM-12-172-E January 26, 2012

Exemption No. 10060A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0456

Mr. Grant E. Goetsch Vice President, Flight Operations Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. Dane County Regional Airport

3606 Corben Court Madison, WI 53704-2573

Dear Mr. Goetsch:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10060. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. (Wisconsin Aviation) for an extension of Exemption No. 10060. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Wisconsin Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Wisconsin

Aviation.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10060 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Em ployees of Wisconsin Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Wisconsin Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10060 to January 31, 2014 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption

No. 10060.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement
of Operations included within this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.


</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                           41,393
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   121,122
<ALLOWANCES>                        899
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                177,744
<PP&E>                          105,219
<DEPRECIATION>                   54,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  265,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            78,698
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          2,463
<OTHER-SE>                      182,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    265,232
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                225,222
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   114,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 81,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  33,127
<INCOME-TAX>                     12,853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              20,274
<DISCONTINUED>                     (395)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     19,879
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.80


</TABLE>
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

National Template

Conservation Practice Overview

Land Clearing (Code 460) 

Land clearing is the removal of trees, stumps, and other

vegetation from wooded areas. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of the practice is to achieve needed land use

adjustments and improvements in the interest of natural

resource conservation. The practice applies to areas where

the removal of woody vegetation and debris is necessary

as part of a conservation plan that involves a planned

change in land use. The proposed land use change will be in accordance with the NRCS capability

classification system. This means a determination was made that the land to be cleared is suited for

the proposed land use and the proposed land use is sustainable. 

Disposal methods for cleared woody, vegetation, and other debris are specified in the plan in

accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The plan provides for measures to protect the

cleared area from erosion and minimize adverse effects on water quality and fish and wildlife habitat.

The specification for this practice identifies trees to be salvaged, lengths of logs, and location of

stacking. 

 

Additional information, including design criteria and specifications, can be found in NRCS

Conservation Practice Standard 460 of the Field Office Technical Guide. 

Common Associated Practices 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ZAHIR BODDY

- JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 156 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2154

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To rename the Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in Fargo, 
  North Dakota, as the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
CENTER IN FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA AS THE EDWARD T. SCHAFER AGRICULTURAL 
RESEARCH CENTER.
    (a) Renaming.--The Red River Valley Agricultural Research Center in 
Fargo, North Dakota, shall hereafter be known and designated as the 
``Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```