alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                       AMISYS Managed Care Systems, Inc.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       (in thousands, except share data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                                                March 31,

                                                                                         1997                1996
                                                                                         ----                ----
<S>                                                                             <C>                     <C> 
Net income                                                                      $        1,013          $       737
                                                                                ==============          ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                           7,754,700            7,565,000

Weighted average options exercised during the period                                    14,773                2,051

Stock options issued within one year of initial public offering 
(using the treasury stock method and the initial
 public offering price of $14.50 per share)                                                 --              597,430

Stock options issued (using treasury stock method and the 
average price of $18.21 per share for the period presented, 
respectively)
                                                                                       525,058                 --
                                                                                       -------          ---------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                 8,294,532          8,164,481
                                                                                     =========          =========

Net income per common share and common share equivalent                                 $ 0.12             $ 0.09
                                                                                      ========             ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.



Date: May 14, 2004              /s/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Claudia M. Pieropan
                                Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2004284EN.01002201.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/22

---

Action brought on 30 August 2004 by Georg Neumann GmbH, Berlin against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-358/04)

(2004/C 284/44)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 August 2004 by Georg Neumann GmbH, Berlin, Berlin (Germany), represented by R. Böhm, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 June 2004 in Case R 919/2002-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 June 2004 in Case R 919/2002-2;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark applied for: | Three-dimensional trade mark in the form of a microphone head grill in respect of goods in Class 9 (Microphones) — Application No 493 643 |
| --- | --- |
| Decision contested before the Board of Appeal: | Refusal of the application by the examiner |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | — | The contested decision infringes Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. |

Community trade mark applied for:

Three-dimensional trade mark in the form of a microphone head grill in respect of goods in Class 9 (Microphones) — Application No 493 643

Decision contested before the Board of Appeal:

Refusal of the application by the examiner

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

—

The contested decision infringes Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

| — | The trade mark applied for is distinctive. |
| --- | --- |

—

The trade mark applied for is distinctive.

---
# C_2004259EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 October 2004

(2004/C 259/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,259 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6963 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0734 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5374 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,62 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,23 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5755 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,488 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6714 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4306 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2973 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 130 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,88 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,965 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 871 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,714 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5721 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,804 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8213 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1065 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9148 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,259

JPY

Japanese yen

136,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6963

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0734

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5374

ISK

Iceland króna

87,62

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,23

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5755

CZK

Czech koruna

31,488

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6714

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4306

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2973

ROL

Romanian leu

41 130

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,88

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,965

TRL

Turkish lira

1 871 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,714

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5721

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,804

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8213

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1065

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,91

ZAR

South African rand

7,9148

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### CANAVERAL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and Bimini Run, Ltd., Appellant, v. TALCO CAPITAL CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 21582.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 10, 1965.

Robert H. Givens, Jr., Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Richard P. Kenney, Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and DYER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The opinion of the District Court in 225 F.Supp. 1007 is correct and the judgment is

Affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Mechanical Properties of Unirradiated and Irradiated Zr-1% Nb Cladding: Procedures and Results of Low Temperature Biaxial Burst Tests and Axial Tensile Tests (NUREG/IA-0199, IPSN 01-16, NSI RRC 2241)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0199 (PDF 2.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 2001

**Prepared by:** E. Kaplar, L. Yegorova, K. Lioutov, A. Konobeyev, N. Jouravkova Nuclear Safety Institute of Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" Kurchatov Square 1, Moscow 123182 Russian Federation

and

V. Smirnov, A. Goryachev, V. Prokhorov, 0. Makarov, S. Yeremin, A. Svyatkin State Research Centre "Research Institute of Atomic Reactors" Dimitrovgrad 433510, Russian Federation

**Prepared for:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety (France), and Ministry of Science and Technologies (Russian Federation)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains the description of the test conditions, procedures, and main results of the following types of mechanical tests of unirradiated and irradiated Zr-1% Nb cladding:
        - biaxial burst tests with liquid pressurized tube specimens in the temperature range 293–723 K;
        - uniaxial tensile tests in axial direction with tube specimens in the temperature range 293–1200 K. 

Results of these tests are compared with test results obtained in 1997–1999 using simple ring specimens (293–1200 K) and gas pressurized tube specimens (900–1400 K).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 86-680.

#### Clancy *v.*Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
August 2014

 

 OEM Support

 Dates indicated in ( ) above describe when the OEM first approved B20 or higher biodiesel blends

 All major OEMs producing diesel vehicles for the U.S. market support at least B5 and lower blends, and over 78% of those 

manufacturers now support B20 or higher biodiesel blends in at least some of their equipment, including nearly 85% of the 

medium & heavy duty truck OEMs. The biodiesel component must meet ASTM D6751, the approved standard for pure 

biodiesel, and the B20 blends must meet ASTM D7467 specifications. Many OEMs also recommend the use of a BQ-9000 

supplier.

 For a complete detailed listing of OEM position statements on biodiesel, visit: www.biodiesel.org/using-biodiesel/oeminformation.

OEMs Supporting B100 OEMs Supporting B20 OEMs Supporting B5 

Case IH (2007) Arctic Cat (2006) Audi * 

(Allow up to B20 in IL in 

2009-2014 models)

Deutz AG (2012) Buhler (2007) BMW

Fairbanks Morse (2007) Caterpillar (All model years) Hustler Turf Equipment

New Holland (2007) Chrysler – Ram (2007) & Jeep (2013) Mercedes Benz * 

(For blends over B5, see MB brochure)

Cummins (2002) Mitsubishi Fuso *

Daimler Trucks - Including: (2012) PACCAR - Including:

 - Detroit Diesel * (Series 60 engines 

only; other models approved for B5)

 - Kenworth

 - Freightliner / “ Custom Chassis - Peterbilt

 - Thomas Built Buses Volkswagen * 

(Allow up to B20 in IL and MN in 

2009-2014 models)

 - Western Star

Ferris (2011) * = Actively Researching B20

Ford (2011)

GMC & Chevrolet 

(2011 all; SEO available since 2007)

HDT USA Motorcycles (2008)

Hino Trucks (2011) Biodiesel Position Not Yet Announced:

Navistar - International / MaxxForce 

(2007)

JCB

IC Bus (2007) Mahindra

Isuzu Commercial Trucks (2011) Mazda

John Deere (2004) Porsche

Kubota (2006) Nissan

Mack (EPA 2007 & EPA 2010 models)

Monaco RV (2007)

Perkins (2008)

Tomcar (2008)

Toro (2008; SEO kits for <2008)

Volvo Trucks (EPA 2010 models)

Workhorse (2007)

Yanmar (2011)
# C_2004118EN.01001301.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-359/01 P: British Sugar plc v Tate & Lyle plc, Napier Brown & Co. Ltd and Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Sugar market - Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 81(1) EC) - Agreement - Effect on trade between Member States - Fine - Proportionality)

(2004/C 118/23)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-359/01 P: appeal by British Sugar plc, established in Peterborough (United Kingdom), (Lawyers: T. Sharpe QC and D. Jowell, barrister, and A. Nourry, solicitor) against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2001 in Joined Cases T-202/98, T-204/98 and T-207/98 Tate & Lyle and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-2035, seeking the annulment of that judgment, the other parties to the proceedings being: Tate & Lyle plc, established in London (United Kingdom), Napier Brown & Co. Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom), applicants at first instance, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner, assisted by N. Khan, barrister) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C.W.A Timmermans and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders British Sugar plc to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders British Sugar plc to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 10.11.2001.

1

---
# C_2004194EN.01000601.xml

| 30.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/6

---

EX POST NOTIFICATION OF EUROSTAT GRANTS IN 2003

EX POST NOTIFICATION OF EUROSTAT GRANTS IN

Public information

(2004/C 194/04)

In accordance with Article 110(2) of the Financial Regulation and Article 169 of its implementing rules, the public is hereby informed of actions which benefited from a Eurostat grant in 2003.

The electronic file which covers the actions in question can be found on the EUROPA server (http://europa.eu.int). The file, which takes the form of a list, can be accessed by following the path ‘Institutions’, ‘Commission’, ‘Statistics’, ‘Eurostat Activities’ and ‘Calls for tenders and grants’, and then going into the file ‘Eurostat: List of grants awarded in 2003’.

‘Eurostat: List of grants awarded in 2003’

The list indicates the file number, the unit responsible, the name and country of the beneficiaries, the title of the action, the amount granted and the co-financing rate of the action.

All of these actions were the subject of ex ante notification.

ex ante

---
# C_2004118EN.01003101.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/31

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Fourth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-202/03 (reference by the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Lombardia, Sezione Staccato di Brescia, for a preliminary ruling): DAC SpA v Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Spedali Civili’ di Brescia (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 89/665/EEC - Review procedures in the sphere of public procurement - Interim relief ante causam)

(2004/C 118/56)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-202/03 – reference to the Court of Justice pursuant to Article 234 EC by the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia, Sezione Staccata di Brescia (Regional Administrative Court for Lombardy, Brescia Division) (Italy) for a preliminary ruling in the case pending before that court between DAC SpA and Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Spedali Civili’ di Brescia, third party Pellegrini SpA, on the interpretation of Articles 1(3) and 2(1) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33), as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and K. Lenaerts, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 29 April 2004 the operative part of which is as follows:

On a proper construction of Article 2(1) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Member States are required to confer on their review bodies the power to adopt, irrespective of whether or not an action going to the substance of the case has already been brought, all interim measures, including measures to suspend the procedure for the award of the public procurement contract at issue.

---

(1)  OJ C 171 of 19 July 2003.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2122 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2122

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 
        a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY 
REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT INVOLVING JENNINGS RANDOLPH DAM.
    (a) Extension of Time.--Notwithstanding the time period specified 
in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715 (referred to in this section as the ``project''), the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as 
the ``Commission'') may, at the request of the licensee for the 
project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of, and the 
procedures of the Commission under, that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods that begin on the date of the expiration of the extension 
originally issued by the Commission.
    (b) Obligation of Licensee.--Any obligation of the licensee for the 
project for the payment of annual charges under section 10(e) of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence on the expiration 
of the time period to commence construction of the project, as extended 
by the Commission under subsection (a).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--
        (1) In general.--If the period required for the commencement of 
    construction of the project has expired before the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the license 
    effective as of the date of the expiration of the license.
        (2) Extension.--If the Commission reinstates the license under 
    paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
    shall take effect on the date of the expiration of the license.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        14388957
<SECURITIES>                                  79204522
<RECEIVABLES>                                164413461
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2131002
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3947558
<PP&E>                                         5714424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  367366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               303091910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        243932464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3240000
<OTHER-SE>                                    50319326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 303091910
<SALES>                                        3388391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5056443
<CGS>                                          1498739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3557704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1410368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 23000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2421741
<INCOME-TAX>                                    837824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1583917
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>