alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004163EN.01000201.xml

| 22.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/2

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals for projects and supporting activities in the scope of the Preparatory action on ‘the Enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of security research’ — Activity: Security Research — Call identifier: PASR-2004

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 81 of 31 March 2004
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 81 of 31 March 2004

(2004/C 163/02)

On page 12, in the Annex, point 7:

for:

‘Total indicative budget:EUR 13 million (6-8 projects and some supporting activities)’,

read:

‘Total indicative budget:EUR 14 million (6-8 projects and some supporting activities)’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                    RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

        I,  Floyd  Warkol,  as  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  KSW,  Inc.,  (the
"Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

        (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31,  2007 (the  "Report"),  filed with the U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 7, 2007

                                                  /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Floyd Warkol
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
#### Hardy-Ryan Abstract Company, Respondent, vs. Gunderson and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Henry A. Gunderson*of Portage, attorney, and *Lehner & Lehner*of Princeton of counsel.

For the respondent: *Lockney &*Lowry, attorneys, and *Richard N. Hunter*of counsel, all of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*— Orders affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE 

INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY

PETITION OF: E.W.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 102 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2018, in consideration of the Petition for 

Review, the temporary redaction of Petitioner’s name and other identifying information 

from Report 1 of the Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury is made permanent. See

In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 190 A.3d 560 (Pa. 2018); In re Fortieth 

Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 2018 WL _________ (Pa. Dec. 3, 2018). 

The Motion to Unseal and the Application to Lift Stay are DENIED. The Application 

for Stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

The instant order is unsealed.
#### Schmitz, Respondent, vs. Pierron, Appellant: Krier and another, Defendants.

For the appellant: *Denis J. Regan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Albert W. Grady*of Port Washington, attorney, and *Harry V. Meissner*of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the defendants Krier and Krier Preserving Company: *William F. Schanen,*attorney, and *Victor Linley*of counsel, both of Port Washington.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICKY RAMOS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-10-00090-CR

Appeal from

 371st District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1161510D)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ricky Ramos appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. Appellant waived his right

to a jury trial and entered a negotiated plea of guilty. In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial

court placed Appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years. The State

subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate alleging several violations of the terms and conditions of

community supervision. Based on Appellant’s plea of true to several of the alleged violations, the

trial court granted the State’s motion, adjudicated Appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at

imprisonment for a term of five years. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094,

18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why,

in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). 

A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is

wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

December 15, 2010 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

pumping plant (Code 533) 

A pumping plant is a facility that delivers water at a

designed pressure and flow rate to meet a conservation

need. Components of the facility include the required

pump, associated power unit, plumbing, and necessary

appurtenances. It also may include onsite fuel or energy

sources and protective structures. 

Practice Information 

A pumping plant may be installed for a wide variety of

conservation purposes. This includes, but is not limited to, delivery of water for irrigation or livestock

water,reduced energy use,maintenance of critical water levels in wetland sites, transfer of wastewater

for utilization as part of a waste management system, and facilitation of drainage by removal of

surface runoff or ground water. 

The power supply for a pumping plant may come from line power, fossil fuel, photovoltaic panels,

windmills, or water-powered pumps (hydraulic rams). To improve air quality,see NRCS Conservation

Practice Standard Combustion System Improvement (Code 372). 

When planning the installation of a pumping plant, consideration must be given to the potential effects

on ground and surface water from water removal or delivery. Other things to consider include ways to

protect the pumping plant from freezing, flooding, vandalism, and other events. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 15 years. Operation requirements for the facility will

depend upon the type of system chosen by the operator. Maintenance will include routine testing and

inspection of the components, removal of debris, protection against freezing, and periodic inspection

of safety features. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Pumping Plant (533) is commonly applied with

conservation practices such as CPSs Water Well (642), Waste Transfer (634), or Drainage Water

Management (554). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REVIEW REPORT, ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 1998,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended July 31, 1998 and August 1, 1997, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the nine-month
periods ended July 31, 1998, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the nine-month periods ended July 31, 1998, and August 1, 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Autologic Information
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated December 10,
1997, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 1997, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.



August 28, 1998
Woodland Hills, California



                                       16
#### Kantowitz, Respondent, vs. Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Coleman & Barry*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Becker & Meldman,*attorneys, and *Edward H. Meldman*and *Carl J. Reuter*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,477-01

EX PARTE BERNIE RAY LUCAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 16984 IN THE 2nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM CHEROKEE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Applicant’s appeal was dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Lucas v. State, No. 12-09-00346-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler, deliveredNovember 12, 2009,

no pet.).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 

The record before us reflects that Applicant was deprived of his right to appeal his conviction
2

in this case. Therefore, we find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time

appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 16984 from the 2nd District Court of Cherokee

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the

issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence

had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should

Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: November 27, 2013

Do not publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLARENCE A. GOLDSMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 287 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM July 2023

I.18 (+) Predator 

pressure I.8 (-) Plant 

heaving due 

to freezethaw

D.3 (-) Wind velocity 

at soil surface

D.1 (+) 

Infiltration 

I.10 (-) 

Chemical 

drift

I.6 (+) Snow 

trapping

C.1 (+) Fishable, 

swimmable 

waters; aquatic 

populations

I.17 (+) 

Escape 

routes

I.14 (+) 

Songbird 

nesting

I.4 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters 

and aquatic 

habitat 

C.4 (+) Quantity and quality of 

wildlife habitat; wildlife populations 

and diversity

I.3 (-) 

Pathogen 

transport

I.2 (-) 

Sediment 

deposition

I.16 (-) Habitat 

fragmentation; 

(+) travel lanes

I.7 (+) 

Available soil 

water for plant 

growth

I.5 (-) Plant 

damage from 

saltation

C.2 (+) Plant 

productivity and 

cover

I.9 (+) Soil quality

I.1 (-) Soil 

erosion

D.4 (-) Land available 

for crop production

Start

D.6 (+) Fish 

and wildlife 

D.5 (+) Cost for cover

installation and 

maintenance

Initial setting: Cropland impacted by 

wind erosion where increased plant 

stress and mortality is a concern, 

especially when affecting high value 

vegetable and specialty crops.

I.13 (+/-) Net 

return

I.19 (+) Potential 

yields

I.21 (+) Biodiversity

Vigorous, upright vegetation 

and associated root mass

I.15 (+) Food 

availability

C.3 (+/-) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.20 (+) Recreational 

opportunities

D.2 (+) Soil 

organic 

matter 

I.12 (+/-) 

Potential 

income

I.11 (-) Risk; 

potential yields

Increase width of 

herbaceous wind 

barrier

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Herbaceous Wind Barriers (603)
# C_2004186EN.01000101.xml

| 21.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 July 2004

(2004/C 186/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2385 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2091 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5320 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,02 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4870 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58240 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,305 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 249,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6624 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4264 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4763 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 920 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,8700 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,827 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 791 300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6987 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6235 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6601 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8883 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1105 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 437,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3890 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2385

JPY

Japanese yen

134,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66685

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2091

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5320

ISK

Iceland króna

88,02

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4870

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58240

CZK

Czech koruna

31,305

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

249,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6624

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4264

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4763

ROL

Romanian leu

40 920

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,8700

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,827

TRL

Turkish lira

1 791 300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6987

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6235

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6601

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8883

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1105

KRW

South Korean won

1 437,47

ZAR

South African rand

7,3890

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) for the Installation of a Terminal Groin Structure at 
the Eastern End of Ocean Isle Beach, Extending Into the Atlantic Ocean, 
West of Shallotte Inlet (Brunswick County, NC)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Changes to public hearing and comment period end dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The comment period for the DEIS published in the Federal 
Register on January 23, 2015, required comments be submitted on or 
before March 9, 2015. The DEIS comment period has been changed to March 
16, 2015. Additionally, the Public Hearing date has been changed to 
March 3, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action 
and DEIS can be directed to Mr. Tyler Crumbley, Wilmington Regulatory 
Field Office, telephone: (910) 251-4170, facsimile (910) 251-4025, or 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f3feebe2f5a9e4f5f2eae5ebe2fec7f2f4e6e4e2a9e6f5eafea9eaeeeb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abdfd2c7ced985c8d9dec6c9c7ced2ebded8cac8ce85cad9c6d285c6c2c7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01761 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOSEPH ANTHONY JENKINS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 525 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### LARKIN BRANNUM *against*BENJAMIN ELLISON.

Where B pretended that he held a bond on a certain individual to make him a title to a tract of land, and sold his interest in said land to A, partly for cash and partly for A's bonds, on its appearing that B had no such title bond, and no interest in the land, it was *Held*that A was entitled to have the collection of the balance of the purchase-money enjoined, and a decree for repayment of the sum advanced; but that as preliminary thereto, he must surrender the possession of the land which he had obtained from B.

Cause removed from the Court of Equity of Cherokee county.

The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

No counsel appeared for the plaintiff in this Court.

Gaither, for the defendant.

MaNly, *J.*

It seems the defendant, professing to be the owner of a bond on G. W. Hayes, to make title to a parcel of land in Cherokee, bargained and sold his interest in the same for the sum of three hundred dollars to the complainant, who thereupon, in consideration of a promise, on the part of the defendant, to get the bond and assign the same in proper form, paid the sum of $185 75, and gave his bonds for the residue of the purchase-money. The equity of the bill rests upon the allegation that defendant has not assigned the bond as promised, nor in any other way made title to the land, but is now fraudulently insisting that he has done so, and is enforcing the collection of the purchase-money. We have examined the testimony, especially the depositions of G. W. Hayes and N. *436Jarratt, and find the allegations of the bill sustained. The defendant seems never to have had any bond or other assurance for title from Ilayes, or any one else, which he could assign or transfer, and complainant is therefore left entirely without title, or security for title. It is uncouscientious, therefore, in the defendant to enforce his demand for the residue of the purchase-money, or to keep the moneys that have been paid him upon the contract. It seems, however, that defendant had occupation of the land at the time of the agreement which he delivered to plaintiff, and that plaintiff’s son, claiming under the father, is still in possession. A condition precedent, therefore, to the relief which the bill asks, is that the-possession of the land now held by the son, shall be again transferred to the defendant; subject to this condition, we are of opinion the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for the moneys paid by him and interest, and to a perpetual injunction against the collection of the residue. A decree may be drawn in conformity with the opinion.

Pee CitkxaM, Decree accordingly.

*** Judge Manly being a stockholder in the Atlantic and North Carolina Rail Road Company, took no *part in*the decision of the case of McRae v. the Company, ante 395, nor in any other where that corporation was concerned.