alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,026,173              18,026,173
<SECURITIES>                                 9,969,740               9,969,740
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,451,429               1,451,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,563,760              29,563,760
<PP&E>                                       3,311,485               3,311,485
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,227,557               1,227,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,931,079              32,931,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,881,102               1,881,102
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 21,452,000              21,452,000
<COMMON>                                       251,423                 251,423
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,846,554               1,846,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,931,079              32,931,079
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,057,508               1,879,547
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,442                 130,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,529,474               9,153,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,695,074)             (7,468,111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,695,074)             (7,468,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,695,074)             (7,468,111)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)                   (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)                   (.37)


</TABLE>
# C_2004273EN.01002604.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/26

---

Removal from the register of Case C-197/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 273/50)

By order of 29 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-197/02: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.

---

(1)  OJ C 191 of 10.8.2002.

1

---
#### AIR CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 20289.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 1965.

P. D. Thomson, D. P. S. Paul, Paul & Sams, Miami, Fla., Seymour A. Gopman, of Kastenbaum, Mamber, Gopman, Epstein & Miles, Miami Beach, Fla., for petitioner.

Melvin Pollack, Atty, NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen., Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, for respondent.

Before JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The challenged findings of the National Labor Relations Board that petitioner had discriminated against two of its employees in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. That portion of the order of the Board directing that these employees be reinstated with back pay will be enforced. Events occurring subsequent to the Board hearing and the entry of its order make it unnecessary that we consider the other questions originally presented.
#### Heindel, Special Deputy Commissioner of Banking, Appellant, vs. Brazel and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *McDaniel & Olson*of Darlington.

For the respondent Robert Brazel: *W. A. Loveland*of Monticello and *Conley & Conley*of Darlington.

For the respondent Martin Brazel: *Blum & Blum*of Monroe.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2020

I.9 (+) Ground 

water recharge

Waterspreading (640)

C.1 (+/-) Income and income stability (individuals and community)

Initial setting: Areas of previously 

disturbed land, generally less than 

50 acres in size, in proximity to 

farmland or rangeland where extra 

moisture is needed for crop or 

forage production

I.5 (+) Infiltration

Start

1. A system of dams, dikes, ditches, or other 

means of diverting or collecting runoff from 

natural channels, gullies, or streams and 

spreading it over relatively flat areas

D.3 (+) Water on 

soil surface 

following rainfall

D.2 (+) Water source 

for desired purpose

I.10 (+/-) Water 

available for 

other uses

C.2 (-) Fish and wildlife 

habitat and populations

I.3 (+) Plant 

health and food 

production

D.1 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

Dike (356)

Land Smoothing (466)

Dam, Diversion (348)

Open Channel (582) 

(348)

I.1 (+/-) Net return

I.4 (+) Income 

potential

I.7 (+) 

Availability of 

nutrients in 

root zone

I.2 (+) Flexibility 

and efficiency 

of management

I.8 (+) 

Contaminants 

to ground 

waters

I.14 (+/-) Nutrient and 

sediment transport

D.4 (-) 

Downstream 

flows

I.6 (+) Dissolved 

nutrients and 

contaminants in 

subsurface waters

C.3 (+/-) Quality 

of receiving 

waters

2. Outlet for return 

flows

(+)

Grassed Waterway 

(412)

Nutrient Management 

(590)

))

Integrated Pest 

Management (595)

I.13 (-) ))

Peak flows 

/flooding

D.5 (+) Concentrated 

discharge to watershed

I.11 (-) 

Stream 

stability

I.12 (+) 

Erosion

Critical Area Planting 

(342)

Nutrient Management (590)
#### Hudson Sharp Machine Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Kenneth Grubb*and *Arthur Larson*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                              EXHIBIT (10)(xiii)


                         Amendment of Trust Agreement

      RESOLVED, further, that the Trust Agreement, dated as of September 15,
      1994, between the Company and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A., as
      Trustee (the "Trust Agreement"), which is intended to provide a source of
      funds for benefits to participants and beneficiaries covered under certain
      employee benefit plans ("Plans") maintained by the Company, be amended,
      through an amendment thereto, effective immediately prior to the Effective
      Time to provide that (a) assets may revert to the Company from the Trust
      when the value of such assets exceeds 100% of the present value of
      liabilities under all of the Plans, (b) only those pension benefits
      accrued up to the date of the Effective Time may be paid out of assets of
      the Trust, (c) only participants in the Plans as of the date of the
      Effective Time shall be entitled to have their benefits in the Plans paid
      out of assets of the Trust and (d) the Company may satisfy its funding
      obligations to the Trust by contributing letters of credit issued in favor
      of the Trust by a financial institution with a rating of "AA" or higher or
      may substitute one or more such letters of credit for assets currently
      held by the Trust; and

      RESOLVED, further, that the Authorized Officers and other appropriate
      representatives of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized,
      empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to
      execute such certificates, instruments and documents and take any and all
      other such actions as such officers or representatives shall deem
      necessary, advisable or appropriate in order to amend the Trust Agreement
      and carry out the intent and purposes of the foregoing resolutions, the
      taking of any such action to be deemed conclusive evidence that the Board
      and the Company have authorized such action.
#### Carmine Rocioppi, Respondent, v Bay Club, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[774 NYS2d 735]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants, Bay Club, Inc., Bay Club Condominiums, and the City of New York appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated March 28, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint to add a cause of action alleging breach of contract and denied their cross motion to dismiss any cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof granting the motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion, and (2) adding thereto the words “as unnecessary” following the words “Defendant’s cross motion is denied”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellants.

*657Leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted absent a showing of prejudice resulting from the delay and provided that the proposed amendment is not plainly lacking in merit *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Monello v Sottile, Megna,*281 AD2d 463 [2001]). In this case, the plaintiff failed to satisfy the standard. Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, he could not assert a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract against Bay Club Condominiums and the City of New York as a third-party beneficiary of the contract between those parties since the record is devoid of any evidence that they intended that the plaintiff be a beneficiary of the contract *(see Amin Realty v K & R Constr. Corp.,*306 AD2d 230 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 515 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
# C_2004260EN.01000101.xml

| 22.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 October 2004

(2004/C 260/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2606 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4358 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69005 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0789 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5365 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,29 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2345 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5755 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,533 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6712 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4299 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,303 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 107 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,96 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 871 000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7125 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5716 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8153 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8227 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1081 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8586 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2606

JPY

Japanese yen

135,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4358

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69005

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0789

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5365

ISK

Iceland króna

87,29

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2345

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5755

CZK

Czech koruna

31,533

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6712

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4299

PLN

Polish zloty

4,303

ROL

Romanian leu

41 107

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,96

TRL

Turkish lira

1 871 000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7125

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5716

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8153

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8227

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1081

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,60

ZAR

South African rand

7,8586

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit
10.30(ii) 


 
 

AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT    
  


    THIS
AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made as of May 2, 2001, by and between Interactive Portal, Inc., an Indiana corporation (the "Company"),
and Interactive Intelligence, Inc., an Indiana corporation (the "Subscriber"). 


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Subscriber are parties to a Subscription Agreement dated as of November 15, 2000 (the "Subscription Agreement"), which provides that the Company
will issue and sell to the Subscriber, and the Subscriber will purchase and accept from the Company, 50,000 of the Common Shares of the Company (the "Subscription Shares") from time to time prior to
June 29, 2001. 


    WHEREAS,
a portion of the Subscription Shares have been issued and sold to the Subscriber, and 30,000 shares remain to be purchased (the "Remaining Subscription Shares") pursuant to
the Subscription Agreement. 


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Subscriber desire to amend the Subscription Agreement to extend the date by which the Remaining Subscription Shares must be purchased to
December 31, 2001. 


    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 



    1.  The
Subscription Agreement is hereby amended such that in every place in the Subscription Agreement that the date "June 29, 2001" appears, it shall be
replaced with the date "December 31, 2001." 


    2.  Except
as amended by this Amendment, the Subscription Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 



	 	INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC.
	

 	

By:	

/s/ MICHAEL J. TAVLIN   
 Michael J. Tavlin

Chief Financial Officer
	

 	

INTERACTIVE PORTAL, INC.
	

 	

By:	

/s/ DONALD E. BROWN M.D.   
 Donald E. Brown, M.D.

President











QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
#### Leo P. McKEE, as Trustee for Industrial Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Fred ABLON et al., Appellees.

No. 21988.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 1965.

Carl V. Wisner, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant.

J. Edward Worton, Miami, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

While on the record before us- it is evident that the appellant made out a case which would have warranted a finding in his favor on the issue of fraudulent conveyance under § 70, sub. e of the Bankruptcy Act, and on the issue of transfer without adequate consideration, these two issues were fact issues, and their resolution cannot be upset unless clearly erroneous. We cannot find that, on an issue depending so heavily on credibility and demeanor determinations, the findings were clearly erroneous.

The trial court did not err in dismissing the third count of the complaint.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660) (7/2022) Overview(108.54 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660) Overview(603.48 KB)

Tree/Shrub Pruning (Ac.) (660) CPPE(24.77 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|March 10, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|               | Marc N. Teal                                         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC IV Assignor Corp.
|               |
# C_2004267EN.01000301.xml

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3512 — VNU/WPP/JV)

(2004/C 267/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3512. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3512. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---