alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Duncan M‘Rae *v.*the Administrators of J Moore.

When *“*no na,oís” are picad, toe Plihstiff shall have judgment for the amount of tne assets which h- can show in the hands of the Administrator, anu judgment *guando*for the batanee of his debt.

Set off and no assets pleaded. The debt was one hundred and fifty-four pounds two shillings, and Plaintiff produced the inventory, shewing assets to the value of one bundled and twenty-four pounds eighteen shillings and six pence; end the jury gave their verditt accordingly — whereupon the Plaintiff* had judgment Cor one bund red and twenty-four pounds eighteen shillings and six-pence, to he levied of the goods of the deceased, in the hands of the administrators ; and for the, residue he had judgment to be ¡. vied of the assets which should thereafter come to the hands of the administrators to be administered.

*Vide S Rep.*!34. Stcinb. 392. *Leon.fol 67.*1 .find.. 150. *The Office of Executors, p.*191, says Plaintiff shall have judgment. f«r ps much as Defendant hath assets to *210pay, an(] an award that *quando*assets *acciderint in futuro,*that then he shall have, judgment fur th>' residue, npon which award a *sci. fa.*lies to have judgment and execution. *Co. Eat. 151, b.*

Note — *Vide 1 Saund. 336, note 10,*for the form of tin- judgmen in auch case. See also *Gregory v. Hooker’s admr.*1 *Dev.*442,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE MARCH 31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001003950
<NAME>                                         PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         19,087
<SECURITIES>                                   14,966
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               48,357
<PP&E>                                          5,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,813
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                          132
<OTHER-SE>                                     43,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,650
<SALES>                                        11,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,594
<CGS>                                           3,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,436
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.17



</TABLE>
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

Event Reports                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
#### City of Madison, Respondent, vs. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin, Appellant.

*September 13*

October *8, 1929.*

*572For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of the *Attorney General*and *Suel 0. Arnold,*assistant attorney general.

*Frank Jenks,*city attorney, for the respondent.

Fritz, J.

Sec. 193.11, Stats., relating to street railway corporations, provides, in part, as follows:

> “Wherever such corporation has constructed its railway on any street or highway under a franchise granted to it by any town or'village board or city council, such corporation shall not, during the term of such franchise, abandon or discontinue any part of such railway on a public street or highway within any town, village or city without the consent of the proper town or village board or city council.”

In view of that provision, the Madison Railways Company cannot lawfully abandon or discontinue railway service on Harrison and Regent streets without the consent of the city council of Madison.

There is no statute conferring authority upon the Railroad Commission to order such abandonment or discontinu: anee. Sec. 195.20, Stats., upon which the defendant relied, is not applicable. That section merely authorizes the commission to order certain changes or alterations in physical conditions, or the mode of crossing, in or about highways or railroads, at railroad crossings or approaches thereto, *573when, in the opinion of the commission, public safety requires an alteration.

The trial court properly concluded that the Railroad Commission had no authority to enter the orders in question. Its judgment vacating and setting aside those orders must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
f'AA- 2.0 10-12.07

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

i'\:l1iOlllll Uusincs,> Aircraft Assorialioll Eli Colti J/5/(() .-

Rl'~iolllll Airiim' Assodalion Dllve LoHcn'r 3/sJ/D ~

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Assochltion Robert Hackman

3Lr:1 V -

ATA M Lopez 3/r; /0 ~
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | a. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael J. DeeName:

Michael J. DeeTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 13, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1787

   To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 99 years 
            certain restricted land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2017

  Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico (for himself and Ms. Michelle Lujan 
    Grisham of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 99 years 
            certain restricted land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-YEAR 
              LEASE.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(commonly known as the ``Long-Term Leasing Act'') (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Indians,,'' and inserting ``Indians,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,'' after 
        ``Cochiti,'';
            (3) by inserting ``the pueblo of Santa Clara,'' after 
        ``Pojoaque,'';
            (4) by striking ``the the lands'' and inserting ``the 
        land'';
            (5) by striking ``lands held in trust for the Pueblo of 
        Santa Clara,''; and
            (6) by striking ``lands held in trust for Ohkay Owingeh 
        Pueblo''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.6

                 CATEGORICAL STANDARDS OF DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     Precision Drilling Corporation (the "Company") has adopted the
following standards for determining if a director is independent:

     A director will not be considered independent if:

     1.  he or she is an employee, or has an immediate family member that is an
         executive officer, of the Company, until three years after the end of
         such employment relationship, provided that employment as an interim
         Board Chair or Chief Executive Officer shall not disqualify a director
         from being considered independent following that employment;

     2.  he or she receives, or has an immediate family member that receives,
         more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company,
         other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of
         deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is
         not contingent in any way on continued service), until three years
         after he or she ceases to receive more than $100,000 per year in such
         compensation, provided that compensation received by a director for
         former service as an interim Board Chair or Chief Executive Officer,
         and compensation received by an immediate family member for service as
         a non-executive employee of the Company, need not be considered in
         determining independence under this test;

     3.  he or she is affiliated with or employed by, or has an immediate family
         member that is affiliated with or employed in a professional capacity
         by, a present or former internal or external auditor of the Company,
         until three years after the end of the affiliation or the employment or
         auditing relationship;

     4.  he or she is employed, or has an immediate family member that is
         employed, as an executive officer of another company where any of the
         Company's present executives serve on that other company's compensation
         committee, until three years after the end of such service or the
         employment relationship; or

     5.  he or she is an executive officer or an employee, or has an immediate
         family member that is an executive officer, of a company that makes
         payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or
         services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the
         greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company's consolidated gross
         revenues, until three years after falling below such threshold.


      These standards shall be applied in a manner consistent with, and the
definition of "immediate family member" shall be as set forth in, Section
303(A)(2)(b) of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange ("Section
303(A)(2)(b)"). A director that, under Section 303A(2)(b), is presumed not to be
independent, is not considered independent.

      The ownership of stock in the Company by directors is encouraged, and the
ownership of a substantial amount of stock is not in itself a basis for a
director to be considered as not independent.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Aquatic Organism Passage , Dike, Grade Stabilization Structure, Pond, Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining-Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining-Soil Dispersant, Structure for Water Control, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Wetland Enhancement, Wetland Restoration, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of C.S.G., Jr., a Juvenile

No. 06

- 22

- 00006

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law of

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No.

21JV0037

- CCL ). Memorandum Opinion

delivered by Justice van Cleef

, Chief

Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens
participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the juvenile court’s order s of adjudication and

disposition and remand the matter to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent wi th

this opinion.

We further order that the appellee pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 9 , 2022

BY O RDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# Dry Hydrant (No.) (432) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Dry Hydrant (No.) (432) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Dry Hydrant (No.) (432).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Dry Hydrant (No.) (432) (7/2021) Standard Document(115.37 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Dry Hydrant (No.) (432) Overview(200.02 KB)

Dry Hydrant (No.) (432) Network Diagram(63.94 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
No. 91-5668.

#### Bartee *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
# Winter Grazing Pasture Walk

            Brown County,        WI    

WisconsinAnimalsLandRange & Pasture

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  Winter Grazing Pasture Walk 

This pasture walk will leave you with the knowledge to guide you towards successfully implementing winter grazing on your farm!

## Registration

No pre-registration is required!

Join NRCS Resource Conservationist Myles Elsen for a tour of TWO beef operations in action and discuss winter grazing topics like:
                - How do cattle hold up outside in winter?
                - What should you expect the ground look like?
                - How do the cattle get water?
                - What to do when temperatures get really cold or there is rain in forecast?
                - How to place bales and when?

Learn about identifying Critical and Sensitive areas to avoid when plotting out winter grazing paddocks. Discussions on winter water systems, wind protection, heavy use pads, and more!

EVENT DETAILS

**1:30pm:** Meet at Scott Brandenburg’s farm - 6754 County Rd W, Greenleaf, Wisconsin

**2:30pm:** Head to Nick Dobberpuhl’s farm - 5886 County Rd X, De Pere, Wisconsin

### *Be sure to dress for the weather!*

## Contact

                -    Myles Elsen 
                -    myles.elsen@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
*May 8, 1934.*

#### Milwaukee Restaurant Company and others, Appellants, vs. Henrikson and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Alexander, Burke & Clark, Frank P. Burke*and *Giles F. Clark,*attorneys, and *George A. Burns*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Lines, Spooner & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Charles B. Quarles*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-3 No. 333-44141, Form S-3 No. 333-40451 and Form S-8 dated October 9, 
1997) of Arden Realty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated 
February 2, 1999 (except for Note 7, as to which the date is March 9, 1999), 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Arden 
Realty, Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 23, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                           1,389,564
<SECURITIES>                         7,431
<RECEIVABLES>                       742,458
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,197,823
<PP&E>                              734,742
<DEPRECIATION>                       32,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    4,094,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             916,658
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              2,612
<OTHER-SE>                        2,586,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      4,094,014
<SALES>                           5,585,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5,777,823
<CGS>                             4,983,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     6,078,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   (161,088)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 78,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (139,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (139,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      (139,550)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.053)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
        


</TABLE>