alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------



                      CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on
         Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filed with the
         Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio
         Estrada, Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
         U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
         belief:

         1) the Report complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
         Company.

Date: November 13, 2003

By /s/ Antonio Estrada
----------------------
Antonio Estrada, Corporate Controller
Principal Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         687,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  385,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,202
<INVENTORY>                                    228,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,302,161
<PP&E>                                         362,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 256,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,414,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,645
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,414,218
<SALES>                                      1,427,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,429,514
<CGS>                                          764,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  764,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,923,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,258,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,258,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,258,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

p0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

142729 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 142729 

 ADB: 09-43-GA 

RAYMOND A. MACDONALD, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 
U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending July 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,



|1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                        

|2) | the
                                         information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By | /s/ Arthur L. Smith                   | 
|-- | ------------------------------------- | 
|   | Arthur L. Smith                       | 
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|   | July 15, 2015                         |
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Canal or Lateral, Irrigation Ditch Lining, Irrigation Field Ditch, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation System-Tailwater Recovery, Nutrient Management, Pumping Plant, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Exhibit 31.2
 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ James G. StewartJames G. StewartSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Irrigation Ditch Lining, Irrigation Field Ditch, Irrigation Pipeline.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
**Exhibit 32**

**GREAT PLAINS ETHANOL, LLC**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

The undersigned, Rick Serie, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and the Chief Financial Officer of Great Plains Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”),has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

·                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thisCertification as of the 21st dayof March, 2007.
|        |   | /s/ Rick Serie                                       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Rick Serie                                           |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:** Water Well.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Philip M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.



By:

/s/ Philip M. McDermottName:

Philip M. McDermottTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY
24, 1998. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-24-1998
<CASH>                                           4,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                       225
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,362
<PP&E>                                          45,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,816
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,028
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (144)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                       997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christie
B. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.



/s/ Christie B. KellyChristie B. KellyExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the General PartnerDate: May 11, 2011


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2004217EN.01003804.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/38

---

Removal from the register of Case T-249/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 217/70)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 11 June 2004, the President of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case T-249/03, Y v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

1

---
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA September 18, 2020
SEAN PATRICK EMKE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3943 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
Appellant's motion for rehearing is denied. On the court's own motion, the prior opinion dated July 17, 2020, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERKIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
SEAN PATRICK EMKE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3943 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 18, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge. Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sean Patrick Emke appeals the imposition of a prison sentence of 636.45 months. While serving probation on a prior case of possession of child pornography, 1 he was arrested and charged with forty new counts of possession of child pornography. He entered an open plea of no contest on these new counts and admitted to violating

1 In lower court case number 2010-CF-001445AX, Mr. Emke pleaded nolo contendere to twenty counts of possession of child pornography.- 2 -

the terms of his probation. On Mr. Emke's criminal punishment code scoresheet, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.992(a), the trial court designated one count of possession of child pornography as the primary offense. The remaining thirty-nine counts of possession of child pornography were scored as additional offenses. According to Mr. Emke's scoresheet, his lowest permissible sentence, absent a downward departure, was 636.45 months in prison. The trial court sentenced Mr. Emke to 636.45 months in prison on each count. Mr. Emke raises two issues on appeal. We find no merit as to the first issue and affirm without comment the circuit court's decision not to downward depart on his sentences. As to his second issue, we affirm the sentences imposed based upon our decision in Champagne v. State, 269 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019). But see Gabriel v. State, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D2913 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 6, 2019), review granted No. SC19-2155, 2020 WL 1888656 (Fla. Apr. 16, 2020).

Affirmed.

MORRIS, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Crack Growth Rate and Fracture Toughness Tests on Irradiated Cast Stainless Steels (NUREG/CR-7184)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7184 (PDF - 19.06 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2015**Date Published:** July 2015

**Prepared by:** Y. Chen, B. Alexandreanu, and K. Natesan

Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory

Appajosula S. Rao, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Cast austenitic stainless steel, which has a ferrite-austenite duplex microstructure, is used in the cooling system of light water reactors for components with complex shapes, such as pump casings, valve bodies, and coolant piping. In the present study, crack growth rate and fracture toughness J-R curve tests were performed on irradiated cast stainless steels and unirradiated control samples in low-corrosion-potential environments (high-purity water with low dissolved oxygen or simulated pressurized water reactor) at 320°C. Both as-received and thermally aged materials were included to investigate the combined effect of thermal aging and irradiation embrittlement on the fracture behavior of cast stainless steels. The samples were irradiated to approximately 0.08 dpa at the Halden reactor. Good resistance to corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking was observed for all cast stainless steel specimens. Thermal aging had little effect on the crack growth behavior at 0.08 dpa. Cleavage-like fracture was the dominant cracking morphology during the crack growth rate tests, and the ferrite phase was deformed to a lesser extent compared with the surrounding austenite phase. The fracture toughness results showed a dominant effect of neutron irradiation, and the fracture resistances were decreased considerably for all cast specimens regardless of their thermal aging. The reduction in fracture toughness was more significant in the unaged than thermally aged specimens. Nonetheless, the fracture toughness values of thermally aged specimens were 20-30% lower than their unaged counterparts, suggesting a combined effect of thermal aging and neutron irradiation in cast stainless steel.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021