alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001003950                  
<NAME>                                         PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          6,638
<SECURITIES>                                   12,614
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,524
<PP&E>                                          3,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,662
<BONDS>                                            21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           73
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,388
<SALES>                                        22,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,579
<CGS>                                           9,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,992
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.5
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.5
        


</TABLE>
# Anaerobic Digester (No.) (366) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Anaerobic Digester (No.) (366) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Anaerobic Digester (No.) (366) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

366 NHCP CPS Anaerobic Digester 2023(354.75 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

366 NHCP PO Anaerobic Digester 2023(184.96 KB)

366 NHCP NED Anaerobic Digester 2023(93.05 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2004118EN.01004702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/47

---

Action brought on 22 March 2004 by Peróxidos Orgánicos, S.A. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-120/04)

(2004/C 118/102)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 March 2004 by Peróxidos Orgánicos, S.A., Barcelona, (Spain), represented by A. Creus and B. Uriarte, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Articles 1, 2 and 4 of the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E-2/37.585 Organic Peroxides) insofar as they affect the applicant, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Articles 1, 2 and 4 of the Commission's decision of 10 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E-2/37.585 Organic Peroxides) insofar as they affect the applicant,

| — | in the alternative, cancel the fine imposed on the applicant, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, cancel the fine imposed on the applicant,

| — | order the Commission the pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission the pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

By the contested decision the Commission found that the applicant, among others, infringed Article 81 of the EC Treaty by participating in a set of agreements and concerted practices in the sector of organic peroxides from 1 January 1971 to 31 December 1999. On these grounds, the Commission imposed a fine of EUR 500.000 on the applicant.

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the proceedings against it were time barred by virtue of Regulation 2988/1974 (1), since its participation in the infraction ceased in January 1997 and thus a period longer than five years had elapsed before the first actions taken by the Commission in the case in question.

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74 of the Council of 26 November 1974 concerning limitation periods in proceedings and the enforcement of sanctions under the rules of the European Economic Community relating to transport and competition Official Journal L 319 , 29/11/1974 P. 1 - 3

1

---
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (Code 457) 

Mine shafts and adits can be closed by filling, plugging, or

capping, or by installing barriers, gating, or fencing. 

Practice Information 

An underground mine can have a shaft, which is a vertical

opening; or an adit, which is a horizontal tunnel; or both.

Purposes of a mine shaft or adit closure are to: 

• reduce hazards to humans and/or animals, 

• maintain or improve access and/or habitat for wildlife, 

• protect cultural resources, 

• reduce subsidence problems, 

• reduce the emission of hazardous gases, 

• reduce or prevent contamination of surface and groundwater. 

Safety is the first and foremost concern when beginning the process of a mine closure. All

underground mines must be tested for the presence of hazardous gases prior to site investigation

activities. Entry into a mine is restricted to individuals with the proper training. 

Mine shafts and adits can be completely closed by filling the entire mine or by plugging or capping the

opening. These techniques eliminate access into the mine and can also be used to prevent

contaminated water from leaving the mine. 

A mine shaft or adit does not always require complete closure to eliminate the safety concerns.

Restricting human access to a site with barriers, gates, or fences is often sufficient. Careful selection

of the barrier, gate, or fence will allow bats and other small animals to continue to inhabit the mine. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 15 years. Operation and maintenance of a mine shaft or

adit closure will depend upon the method of closure. Normally, the work will consist of conducting

periodic inspections and repairing or replacing damaged components. 

Common Associated Practices 

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (457) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as Land

Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land (543); and Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control (455). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2004312EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 December 2004

(2004/C 312/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3401 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4316 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5320 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,92 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5788 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,620 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6886 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4315 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1612 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 403 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,761 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 880 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7516 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6436 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4191 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8625 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1973 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6824 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3401

JPY

Japanese yen

138,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4316

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68630

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5320

ISK

Iceland króna

84,92

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5788

CZK

Czech koruna

30,620

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6886

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4315

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1612

ROL

Romanian leu

38 403

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,761

TRL

Turkish lira

1 880 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7516

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6436

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4191

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8625

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1973

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,82

ZAR

South African rand

7,6824

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004156EN.01000502.xml

| 12.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/5

---

Action brought on 13 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-174/04)

(2004/C 156/10)

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Enrico Traversa and Claudio Loggi, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that Decree-Law No 192 of 25 May 2001, converted to Law No 301 of 20 July 2001, entitled ‘Urgent provisions to ensure the liberalisation and privatisation of particular public service sectors’ is incompatible with Article 56 of the EC Treaty in so far as it automatically suspends the voting rights attached to shareholdings exceeding 2 % of the share capital of companies in the electricity and gas sectors; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Decree-Law No 192 of 25 May 2001, converted to Law No 301 of 20 July 2001, entitled ‘Urgent provisions to ensure the liberalisation and privatisation of particular public service sectors’ is incompatible with Article 56 of the EC Treaty in so far as it automatically suspends the voting rights attached to shareholdings exceeding 2 % of the share capital of companies in the electricity and gas sectors;

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Decree-Law 192/2001 conflicts with Article 56 of the EC Treaty because it automatically suspends the voting rights attached to shareholdings exceeding 2 % of the share capital of companies in the electricity and gas sectors. That threshold engenders a separate and restrictive treatment of investments on the part of a particular category of investors and therefore obstructs the free movement of capital within the European Community. In particular, that restriction is a disincentive to any public undertakings which might wish to acquire shares in the companies in question since such undertakings will be unable to take any active role in the decision-making of the company and exercise any influence over its management.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 220 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 220

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT UPPER HIDDEN BASIN 
              DIVERSION AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Energy Regulatory Commission.
            (2) Terror lake hydroelectric project.--The term ``Terror 
        Lake Hydroelectric Project'' means the project identified in 
        section 1325 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 
        Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is Federal Energy Regulatory 
        Commission project number 2743.
            (3) Upper hidden basin diversion expansion.--The term 
        ``Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion'' means the expansion 
        of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project as generally described 
        in Exhibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Application dated 
        July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alaska Energy Authority 
        Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII by Kodiak Electric 
        Association, Inc.
    (b) Authorization.--The licensee for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric 
Project may occupy not more than 20 acres of Federal land to construct, 
operate, and maintain the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion 
without further authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or under 
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et 
seq.).
    (c) Savings Clause.--The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion 
shall be subject to appropriate terms and conditions included in an 
amendment to a license issued by the Commission pursuant to the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), including section 4(e) of that Act 
(16 U.S.C. 797(e)), following an environmental review by the Commission 
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.).

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 220

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
(FILE NO. 0-22614) WHICH INCLUDES BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIODS PRESENTED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,398
<SECURITIES>                                     1,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,984
<PP&E>                                           4,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,154
<SALES>                                         12,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,262
<CGS>                                            6,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                       455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
# Windows Pesticide Screening Tool (WIN-PST)

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Windows Pesticide Screening Tool (WIN-PST) 

WIN-PST is an environmental risk screening tool for pesticides.

NRCS field office conservationists, extension agents, crop consultants, pesticide dealers and producers can use it to evaluate the potential of pesticides to move with water and eroded soil/organic matter and affect non-targeted organisms. WIN-PST users can specify pesticides by product name or active ingredient.  Long-term human and fish toxicity data and ratings are also included in WIN-PST. These toxicity ratings can be combined with the off-site movement potential ratings to provide an overall rating of the potential risks from pesticide movement below the root zone and past the edge of the field.

## Installation is fairly simple.  

Just download the WIN-PST installation files.zip and extract to your local drive.

**FPAC users** should use the Software Center to install WIN-PST.

WIN-PSTinstallationfiles(47.46 MB)

After extraction, install each file in this order:
              - vcredist_x86.EXE   - Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package MFC Security Update
              - WinPST3113.exe    - Base WIN-PST ver.  3.1.1
              - WinPST312patch.exe – Update patch to ver. 3.1.20
              - UpdateWIN-PST3.1.30.msp – Final update patch to version 3.1.30

Fix Automatic Pesticide Data Update Notifications In WIN-PST(131.62 KB)

### Pesticide Data Update (Released 3-19-24)

A data update is available for WIN-PST 3.1 pesticide data. The update includes:
              - All active ingredients from past updates.
              - 10 New active ingredients added.
              - Updates to select human toxicity thresholds.
              - Synchronization with EPA Pesticide Product Registration Database as of 3-19-24.

### Download: WIN-PST 3.1 Pesticide Update 3-19-24

WinPstUpdPest_3-19-24.zip

**Note:** Pesticide updates require WIN-PST version 3.1.30

Previous Versions: WIN-PST 3.1 Pesticide Update

WinPstUpdPest_9-26-23(2.92 MB)

WinPstUpdPest_3-24-23(2.98 MB)

WinPstUpdPest9-30-22(2.96 MB)
# C_2005006EN.01004501.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/45

---

Action brought on 2 November 2004 by Jean-Claude Heyraud against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-441/04)

(2005/C 6/88)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 November 2004, by Jean-Claude Heyraud, residing in Brussels, represented by S. Orlandi, A. Cooolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Commission's decision establishing the list of officials promoted to Grade A3 in the second round of the 2003 promotion procedure, and rejecting the applicant's candidature; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision establishing the list of officials promoted to Grade A3 in the second round of the 2003 promotion procedure, and rejecting the applicant's candidature;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case, an official in Grade A4, objects to the Appointing Authority's refusal to promote him to the higher grade in the second round of the 2003 promotion procedure.

In support of his claims, he pleads infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and breach of the principle of non-discrimination.

He states, in that regard, that the Commission ‘standardised’ the merit points awarded by the Directorates-General and Services to officials in middle management in Grade A4 eligible for promotion, for the purposes of considering their comparative merits as prescribed by the Staff Regulations. The standardised mark is fixed in relation to the average merit points awarded to the officials in Grade A4 eligible for promotion to Grade A3 in the second round.

The method used by the Commission is relevant only provided that the average is calculated on the basis of a sufficient number of eligible officials. Since he was the only official in Grade A4 in his Service eligible for promotion in the second round of the 2003 procedure, the applicant was awarded a standardised mark of 100 regardless of his merits and the specific criteria used by his Service to fix merit points.

---