alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) OR
                    RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

           I, Floyd Warkol, as Chief Executive Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2005(the "Report"), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2005


                                                     /s/ Floyd Warkol
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Floyd Warkol
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
# C_2004320EN.01002801.xml

| 24.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/28

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3640 — BLACKSTONE/GERRESHEIMER)

(2004/C 320/17)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3640. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3640. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>



                                                                     Exhibit 4.1
                                                                     -----------

NUMBER                                                          SHARES
XXXX                                                            XXXX


                                  SPECIMEN
                          ALAMOSA (DELAWARE), INC.
                           a Delaware Corporation
       The Corporation is authorized to issue 1,000 Common Shares --
                            Par Value $0.01 each


          This Certifies that XXXX_______________________________________
is the registered holder of X X X X X (XXX)______________________________
Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Alamosa (Delaware),
Inc. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

          In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate
Seal to be hereunto affixed this XXXX day of XXXXXX A.D. XXX.


_________________________            SEAL           ___________________________


          For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
_______________ __________ Shares represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________________
Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

         Dated _________________________________________

         In presence of  _______________________________

         _______________________________________________



                  NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
             MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
               FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
                     WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT,
                          OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

                                     Page 1
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF OFFICER

OF AML COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350

 

Pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officer of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

(a)                                  The quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Information contained insuch Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:February 13,2008

 
| /s/  Heera Lee               |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| By: Heera  Lee,              |
| Director  of Finance and     |
| Principal  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Palmissano, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error. Souther, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*September 13*

October *8, 1929.*

*574
      *L. A. Schweichler*of Milwaukee, for plaintiffs in error.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attor-' ney General, George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *George B. Skogmo*and *Louis S. Wiener,*assistant district attorneys, and oral argument by *Mr. Skogmo.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

While there are separate writs of error, the facts being the same in both cases it was agreed that the case and briefs should be submitted in *Palmissano v. State*and should be considered as the case and briefs in the case of *Souther v. State.*

The sole question raised here is as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding made by the judge of the municipal court of Milwaukee county. The case presents a clear question of fact. Whether or not the evidence sustains the finding of the trial court depends almost wholly upon the credibility' of witnesses. If the court was of the opinion that the witnesses who testified on behalf of the State were telling the truth, that evidence uncontradicted was certainly sufficient to sustain the conclusion of the trial court. If, on the other hand, the court was of the opinion that the witnesses presented by the defendants were testifying to the truth, then the court might well have found that the defendants were not present at the time and place of the alleged robbery and have acquitted the defendants. There is nothing in the facts shown on behalf of the defendants which requires the court to accept the statements of the defendants’ witnesses as true. On the other hand, there were some circumstances and certain conflicts in the testimony which might in the opinion of the trial court have cast a considerable doubt upon the evidence offered by the defendants to establish their *alibi.*No useful purpose would be served by setting forth at length the evidence which tends *575to sustain the finding and that which would tend to sustain a contradictory finding. We have carefully reviewed the evidence as set out in the case and in the record and are convinced that it is sufficient to sustain' the finding of the trial court as to each of the defendants.

It is argued that the evidence with respect to the participation of the defendant Souther is insufficient even if that in respect to the defendant Palmissano be held to be sufficient. We do not so regard it. The defendants by their own admission were together a considerable part' of the evening in question. The only question was as to the time .they were in each other’s company. The evidence sustains the conviction as to both defendants.

*By the Court.*— Judgment of the municipal court of Milwaukee county in each case is affirmed.
#### Boedecker, Respondent, vs. Schalcowitz, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Alvin L. Zelonky*and *Jacob S. Roth-stein,*both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Wengert & Moeller*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2103

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the Frye Scholarship 
        in the Yellow Ribbon G.I. Education Enhancement Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2017

 Mr. Rutherford (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the Frye Scholarship 
        in the Yellow Ribbon G.I. Education Enhancement Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Julian Woods Yellow Ribbon Program 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FRYE SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS IN YELLOW RIBBON G.I. 
              EDUCATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 3317(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 3311(b)'' and inserting 
``paragraphs (1), (2), and (9) of section 3311(b) of this title''.
                                 <all>
```
# CA2005009EN.01000101.xml

| 13.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 9/1

---

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES

VACANCY IN THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES

PRINCIPAL LEGAL COUNSEL

PRINCIPAL LEGAL COUNSEL

(2005/C 9 A/01)

The European Central Bank is seeking applications to fill a position of Principal Legal Counsel in the Institutional Law Division. More details on the profile and tasks covered in this position, as well as information on how to apply, can be obtained on the ECB's website at www.ecb.int (‘For Job applicants’).

---
#### In the matter of Minor Huntington, from Craven.

When a Defendant in execution within the Prison rules, is after-wards thrown into prison by another creditor, he has a right to be discharged from the walls of the prison under the insolvent laws.

*Minor*Huntington, a prisoner for debt, was brought before his Honor Judge DaNIEI., to be discharged under the insolvent laws.

*370it appeared that he had been arrested by one of his creditors and entered into bond with security to keep within the prison bounds, which bond was returned to the County Court. A second creditor arrested him while in the bounds and he was put into close prison, remained there upwards of twenty days, gave notice to each of his creditors pursuant to the statute, and prayed to be discharged generally (upon taking the insolvent oath) from the prison, and the prison bounds: this was objected to by the attorney of the first creditor.

The opinion of the Supreme Court is required, whether the Judge could permit the said *Huntington*to go at large on his taking the oath, so as not to subject his security for the bounds to the debt of the first creditor.

SeáweíIí Judge.

When a Defendant in execution within the prison rules, is afterwards thrown into prison by another creditor, the Defendant then has a right to be discharged from the walls of the prison under the insolvent laws. And when discharged, it is for *him*to determine whether his bond has become vacated by such discharge : he then is at liberty to act in the same way as he was before his imprisonment. The Court cannot in such case restrain him from breaking the bounds, nor will it advise him of the effect which breaking the bounds will have in subjecting his securities. It is not competent for the Court to pass any jüdicial determination upon the rights of creditors, who are not before it, in a shape where the validity of the bond can come in question.

In this opinion, Hall, Daniel, and Ruffin, Judges, concurred.
Th e H o n o r a b le C. Ro g e r V in s o n , Se n io r U n it e d St a te s D is tr ic t Ju d g e f o r th e Nor thern * District of F lorida, sitting by desig nation. NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 07a0805n.06 F iled: Novem ber 15, 2007
No. 06-4082
UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT

UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. CH RI STO PHE R SA DD L ER,
De fe nd a nt- Ap pe lla

nt. )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE S O U T H E R

N D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

Be fore : DAUGHT REY and COOK, Circ uit J udg es; and VI NSON, District J udg e. *

PER C URI AM. Christopher Saddler a ppeals the district c ourt’s orde r deny ing his Motion to Suppress. Having had the benefit of oral a rg ument, and havingstudied the rec ord on appe al and the br ie fs of

the pa rt ie s, we a re no t per su a de d tha t the dis tr ic t c ourt e rr e d in de nyingthe Mo tio n to Suppress. Be cause the district court fu l ly articula ted the re asons for de ny ing the Motion, the issuance of

a deta iled opinion by

this court would be dupli cative a nd would serve no useful purpose

. Ac c or din g ly , we a ff

ir m the jud g me nt of the dis tr ic t c ourt up on the re a so nin g se t ou t by

that c ou rt in its order da ted Fe bruar

y 28, 2006.
# C_2004118EN.01002601.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/26

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Third Chamber)

of 30 April 2004

in Case C-172/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation): Robert Bourgard v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Self-employed workers - Derogation allowed for the determination of pensionable age - Possibility for male workers to claim early entitlement to old-age pension - Limited to forms of discrimination necessary and objectively linked to the difference in pensionable ages - Method of calculation - Reduction for early entitlement)

(2004/C 118/45)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-172/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour de cassation (Belgium), seeking to obtain, in the proceedings pending before that court between Robert Bourgard and Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti), a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 7(1)(a) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24) – the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 30 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security, read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(a), must be interpreted as meaning that, where the national legislation of a Member State has maintained a difference of retirement ages for men and women, it does not preclude that Member State, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings in this case, from calculating the amount of the retirement pension differently according to the sex of the worker and from applying to male workers, who alone have the right to apply for an early retirement pension in the five years prior to the normal age of retirement, a reduction of five per cent for each year in which the pension is taken in advance.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 29. 6. 2002.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,551,189
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,592,112
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,497,893
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,900,715
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                         92,326,727
<ALLOWANCE>                                        777,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,633,072
<DEPOSITS>                                      77,338,095
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,601,392
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3,274
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,790,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 104,633,072
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,046,218
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   81,253
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    67,106
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,194,577
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 842,995
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,085,867
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,108,709
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    794,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    329,388
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         329,388
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       202,176
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                        384,400
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   742,809
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50,649
<RECOVERIES>                                        10,727
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  777,887
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               777,887
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Report of Experimental Results for the International Fire Model Benchmarking and Validation Exercise #3 (NUREG/CR-6905)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6905 (PDF - 9.60 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2003**Date Published:** May 2006

**Prepared by:** A. Hamins, A. Maranghides, R. Johnsson, M. Donnelly, J. Yang, G. Mulholland, R.L. Anleitner

National Institute of Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20869

J. Dreisbach, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6688

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) are participating in an International Collaborative Fire Model Project (ICFMP) to assess and validate fire computer codes for nuclear power plant applications. This assessment is being conducted through a series of benchmarking and validation exercises. The goal of the present study is to provide data from a large-scale fire test series of a simulated nuclear power plant compartment conducted in summer 2003.

The experiments consisted of hydrocarbon spray fires varying from 350 kW to 2 MW in heat release rate, burning in a single compartment 7 m (23 ft) wide, 22 m (72 ft) long, and 4 m (13 ft) tall. The experimental results were composed of 15 tests with more than 370 channels of data per test.

 This report includes a description of the measurement methods and experimental results for tests conducted as part of the International Fire Model Benchmarking and Validation Exercise #3. The experimental data are available electronically to accompany this report. The data can be used as a comparison with fire models as part of the international benchmark exercise.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                May 10, 2006
            /s/
                Stanley K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant