[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5087-5089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-832]


Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:  The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium 
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of review 
(``POR'') is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. This review covers 
one PRC company, Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (``TMI'') 
and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. (``TMM'') (collectively ``TMI/
TMM'').\1\

[[Page 5088]]

The Department preliminarily finds that TMI/TMM did not have reviewable 
entries during the POR. The Department invites interested parties to 
comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Department initiated the instant review on both TMM and 
TMI. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 
36462 (June 27, 2014) (``Initiation Notice''). In the 2011-2012 
review of the order, the Department determined TMM and TMI to be 
collapsed and treated as a single company for purposes of the 
proceeding. See Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 
79 FR 94 (January 2, 2014) and accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum at Comment 5. As this collapsing determination remains 
unchallenged in this review, the instant preliminary results of this 
review cover the single TMM/TMI company. This is consistent with the 
Department's treatment of the single TMM/TMI company under identical 
circumstance in the prior 2012-2013 no shipments review (see Pure 
Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 29416 (May 
22, 2014)).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: January 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brendan Quinn, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5848.

Scope of the Order

    Merchandise covered by the order is pure magnesium regardless of 
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly excluded from the scope of 
the order. Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight 
primarily the element magnesium and produced by decomposing raw 
materials into magnesium metal. Pure primary magnesium is used 
primarily as a chemical in the aluminum alloying, desulfurization, and 
chemical reduction industries. In addition, pure magnesium is used as 
an input in producing magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium encompasses 
products (including, but not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns and 
crystals) with the following primary magnesium contents:

    (1) Products that contain at least 99.95% primary magnesium, by 
weight (generally referred to as ``ultra pure'' magnesium);
    (2) Products that contain less than 99.95% but not less than 
99.8% primary magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as 
``pure'' magnesium); and
    (3) Products that contain 50% or greater, but less than 99.8% 
primary magnesium, by weight, and that do not conform to ASTM 
specifications for alloy magnesium (generally referred to as ``off-
specification pure'' magnesium).

    ``Off-specification pure'' magnesium is pure primary magnesium 
containing magnesium scrap, secondary magnesium, oxidized magnesium or 
impurities (whether or not intentionally added) that cause the primary 
magnesium content to fall below 99.8% by weight. It generally does not 
contain, individually or in combination, 1.5% or more, by weight, of 
the following alloying elements: Aluminum, manganese, zinc, silicon, 
thorium, zirconium and rare earths.
    Excluded from the scope of the order are alloy primary magnesium 
(that meets specifications for alloy magnesium), primary magnesium 
anodes, granular primary magnesium (including turnings, chips and 
powder) having a maximum physical dimension (i.e., length or diameter) 
of one inch or less, secondary magnesium (which has pure primary 
magnesium content of less than 50% by weight), and remelted magnesium 
whose pure primary magnesium content is less than 50% by weight.
    Pure magnesium products covered by the order are currently 
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') subheadings 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 8104.30.00, 
8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope is dispositive.

Background

    On May 1, 2014, the Department published a notice of opportunity to 
request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure 
magnesium from the PRC for the period May 1, 2013 through April 30, 
2014.\2\ On June 2, 2014, U.S. Magnesium LLC (``U.S. Magnesium''), a 
domestic producer and Petitioner in the underlying investigation of 
this case, made a timely request that the Department conduct an 
administrative review of TMI and TMM.\3\ On June 27, 2014, in 
accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``the Act''), the Department published in the Federal Register a 
notice of initiation of this antidumping duty administrative review.\4\ 
On July 22 and 23, 2014, TMM and TMI separately submitted letters to 
the Department certifying that they did not export pure magnesium for 
consumption in the United States during the POR.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative 
Review, 79 FR 24670, 24671 (May 1, 2014).
    \3\ See letter from U.S. Magnesium, ``Pure Magnesium from the 
People's Republic of China: Request for Administrative Review,'' 
dated June 2, 2014.
    \4\ See Initiation Notice.
    \5\ See letter from TMM, ``Pure Magnesium from the People's 
Republic of China; A-570-832; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin 
Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 23, 2014; see also letter 
from TMI, ``Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China; A-
570-832; Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium 
International, Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 22, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 17, 2014, the Department placed on the record 
information obtained in response to a query to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') concerning imports into the United States of 
subject merchandise during the POR.\6\ This information indicates that 
there were no entries of subject merchandise during the POR exported by 
TMI or TMM. In addition, on November 4, 2014, the Department notified 
CBP that it was in receipt of a no-shipment certification from TMI and 
TMM and requested CBP to report any contrary information within 10 
days.\7\ CBP did not report any contrary information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum to the File, ``2013-2014 Administrative 
Review of Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection Data,'' dated December 17, 2014 (``CBP 
Data Query'').
    \7\ See Memo to the File entitled, ``Transmit No Shipment 
Inquiry to the File,'' dated December 16, 2014, containing Customs 
Message # 4308302 (``CBP No Shipment Inquiry'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the ``Background'' section above, TMI and TMM each 
submitted timely-filed certifications indicating that it had no 
shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. 
The Department's review of CBP data supports this certification,\8\ CBP 
did not provide any evidence that contradicts TMI or TMM's claim of no 
shipments,\9\ and no interested party provided comment concerning the 
results of the CBP query.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See CBP Data Query.
    \9\ See CBP No Shipment Inquiry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, based on TMI and TMM's certification and analysis 
information of the record, the Department preliminarily determines that 
TMI/TMM did not have any reviewable entries during the POR. In 
addition, the Department finds that consistent with its recently 
announced refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy 
(``NME'') cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the review in part in 
this circumstance but, rather, to complete the review with respect to 
TMI/TMM and to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final 
results of the review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) and the 
``Assessment Rates'' section, below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 5089]]

Public Comment

    Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary 
results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the 
case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case or rebuttal 
briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a 
statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five 
pages, and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').\11\ ACCESS is 
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the 
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records 
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Requests should 
contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the 
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the 
respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, including the results of its 
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 
days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed 
the name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was 
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. 
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be 
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final 
results of this review. Additionally, pursuant to a recently announced 
refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, if the Department 
continues to determine that an exporter under review had no shipments 
of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under 
that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be 
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI/TMM, which 
claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from 
the rate assigned to TMI/TMM in the most recently completed review of 
the company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-
PRC exporters who are not under review in this segment of the 
proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not 
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.

    Dated: January 22, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-01814 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P