alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004228EN.01004301.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/43

---

Action brought on 21 June 2004 by Monique Negenman against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-255/04)

(2004/C 228/98)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 June 2004 by Monique Negenman, residing in Roosendaal (Netherlands), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 8 March 2004 (and notified on 11 March 2004) rejecting the applicant's complaint of 25 November 2003 against the administrative decisions of 23 October and 30 October 2004 fixing the dates of the beginning and end of the applicant's maternity leave; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 8 March 2004 (and notified on 11 March 2004) rejecting the applicant's complaint of 25 November 2003 against the administrative decisions of 23 October and 30 October 2004 fixing the dates of the beginning and end of the applicant's maternity leave;

| — | order the defendant to pay compensation of EUR 10 000, with the express reservation that this amount may subsequently be increased, reduced or subject to further clarification; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay compensation of EUR 10 000, with the express reservation that this amount may subsequently be increased, reduced or subject to further clarification;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in the present case maintains that the appointing authority incorrectly calculated the dates of the beginning and the end of her maternity leave.

In support of her claims, she alleges that there has been a breach of Article 58 of the Staff Regulations (as worded before 1 May 2004) and of the principle of legitimate expectations, laid down in particular in Article 35 of the Staff Regulations, in that the appointing authority fixed the dates of the beginning and the end of her maternity leave on the basis of the actual date of her confinement, whereas under Article 58 of the Staff Regulations maternity leave starts six weeks before the expected date of confinement as shown in a certificated produced by the official concerned.

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM May 2019

PMCS alternatives are developed and selected with PAMS activities. Producer applies alternatives 

to manage target pests. Activities may include environmental risk analysis and mitigation. Applies 

on all landuses where pests are managed including cropland, pasture, range and forest lands.

I.5 (+) Surface 

water quality

D.1, I.1 (+) 

Crop quality 

and quantity

C.3 (+) Air quality 

of the air shed

C.1 (+) Income 

stability (individuals 

and community)

D.7, I.6 (-) Pesticide 

leaving the site of 

application via drift, 

volatilization, or sorbed 

to airborne sediment

I.7 (+) Soil 

condition

Initial setting: Lands where pests 

will be managed Start

D.6 (-) Water and 

wind erosion

I.2 (+) Land 

operator 

income

D.8 (-) Pesticide 

residues in soil

D.2 (-) 

Pesticides 

leaving the site 

of application 

via leaching

I.3 (+) 

Groundwater 

quality

C.2 (+) Healthy environment for 

humans, domestic animals, 

plants and wildlife

D.3 (-) 

Pesticides 

leaving the site 

of application 

via solution 

runoff

D.4, I.4 (-) 

Pesticides 

leaving the site 

of application 

via sorbed 

runoff

D.5 (+) Beneficial 

species in the field

Pest Management Conservation 

System PMCS (595) 

D. Direct effect

#. Created by 

practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM Date 2022

D.3 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

I.13 (+/-) Net 

return to 

landowner

Start

I.7 (-) Dissolved 

and suspended 

pollutants

D.2 (-) Land available for 

agricultural production

I.6 (+/-) Air 

quality

I.14 (+/-) 

Consumptive 

use of water

I.9 (-) 

Downstream

sedimentation

D.4 (+) Vegetation 

C.2 (+) Water quality

C.5 (+) Recreational

opportunities

I.12 (-/+) 

Land 

values

Wetland Creation (658)

1. Create macro and microtopography to 

artificially provide wetland hydrology

I.15 (+) Wetland 

wildlife habitat

C.3 (+/-) Water 

available for other 

uses

C.4 (+/-) Income and income stability 

(individuals and communities)

Initial setting: Land areas that are not natural 

wetland or were not formerly natural wetland, 

where wetland hydrology can be provided from 

external sources of water, and where deepwater habitat conditions do not exist

2. Establish hydrophytic 

vegetation

D.1 (+) Water retention

I.8 (+) 

Sediment 

retention

I.1 (+) 

Temporary 

flood 

storage

I.16 (+) Soil 

organic matter

I.2 (-) 

Downstream 

flooding

I.10 (+) Aquatic habitats

I.4 (+) Methane 

produced

I.5 (+) 

Greenhouse 

gases

I.3 (+) Habitat for 

undesirable insects

Shallow Water 

Development and 

Management (646)

I.11 (+) 

Sequestration 

of elements and 

compounds

I.17 (-) Greenhouse 

gases

C.1 (+/-) Health and 

safety for humans, 

domestic and wild 

animals

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the effect is 

beneficial or adverse.

 

Pathway

LEGEND

#. Created by 

practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Structure for Water Control 

(587)

Dike (356)
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.29    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT    
  


    This Agreement is entered into among Silicon Graphics, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("SGI"), NKK U.S.A. Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("NKK USA"),
and its sole shareholder, NKK Corporation, a Japanese corporation ("NKK"). 


RECITALS  


    WHEREAS, NKK USA is the sole holder of SGI's Series A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, of which 17,500 shares are issued and outstanding; and 



    WHEREAS,
each share of the Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to be converted into common stock or redeemed at certain times pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Subsections VI, VII and VIII of Article FOURTEENTH of SGI's Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the "Certificate of Designation"); 


    WHEREAS,
the parties desire to provide contractually for a single additional opportunity for NKK USA to elect to convert its shares of Series A Preferred by following the
procedures otherwise set forth in the Certificate of Designation; 


AGREEMENT  


    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, SGI, NKK USA and NKK agree as follows: 


    1.  The
parties will treat March 1, 2001 as though it were a "Measurement Date" as defined in Section VI(A) of the Certificate of Designation, and will
provide such notices, effect such conversions and redemptions, and otherwise take such actions as would be required thereunder. 


    2.  All
provisions of the Certificate of Designation, and all terms and conditions of the Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 2, 1990 among SGI, NKK and NKK
USA, as amended by the Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement among the parties dated as of August 14, 1992, shall remain in full force and effect. 


    3.  This
Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 


    4.  This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be an original and which together will constitute one instrument. 



    5.  This
Agreement will be governed by the law of the State of Delaware. 


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is entered into as of December 1, 2000. 



	SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.	 	NKK CORPORATION
	

By:	
 	

/s/ Jean-Samuel Furter
	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Nobuyuki Naito

	Name:	 	Jean-Samuel Furter	 	Name:	 	Nobuyuki Naito
	Title:	 	Vice President, Treasurer	 	Title:	 	General Manager, Information Processing Systems Department
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

NKK U.S.A. CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Mineo Shimura

	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Mineo Shimura
	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	President











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.29


AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPT. 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,580
<SECURITIES>                                     7,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                       169
<INVENTORY>                                     10,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,297
<PP&E>                                           3,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,634
<SALES>                                         27,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,191
<CGS>                                           18,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (34)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (532)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    130
<INCOME-TAX>                                       707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004217EN.01003102.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/31

---

Action brought on 17 June 2004 by Jacques Wunenburger against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-246/04)

(2004/C 217/56)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 June 2004 by Jacques Wunenburger, residing in Zagreb (Croatia), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision adopted by Mr David O'Sullivan, Secretary General, on 11 September 2003 in his capacity as appeal assessor and adversely affecting the applicant in that it confirms and definitively approves the applicant's Career Development Report for the period 1 July 2001 to 21 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision adopted by Mr David O'Sullivan, Secretary General, on 11 September 2003 in his capacity as appeal assessor and adversely affecting the applicant in that it confirms and definitively approves the applicant's Career Development Report for the period 1 July 2001 to 21 December 2002;

| — | annul that report; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul that report;

| — | annul the decision expressly the applicant's complaint, lodged in accordance with Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations on 9 December 2003 and registered as No R/711/03 and seeking annulment of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision expressly the applicant's complaint, lodged in accordance with Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations on 9 December 2003 and registered as No R/711/03 and seeking annulment of the contested decision;

| — | award the applicant damages for non-material harm and for adversely affecting his career, owing to the substantial irregularities and also to the significant delay in drawing up that report, damages assessed on an equitable basis at EUR 4 000, subject to such amount being increased or reduced in the course of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

award the applicant damages for non-material harm and for adversely affecting his career, owing to the substantial irregularities and also to the significant delay in drawing up that report, damages assessed on an equitable basis at EUR 4 000, subject to such amount being increased or reduced in the course of the proceedings;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant claims that there has been a breach of the second paragraph of Article 25 and of Articles 26 and 43 of the Staff Regulations and also of the general implementing provisions relating to the latter article adopted by the Commission on 26 April 2002. He also claims that there has been a breach of the rights of defence, of the principle of sound administration, of the duty to have regard for his welfare and of the principle of equal treatment, and also a manifest error of assessment.

---
#### Mark John BEUFVE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22537.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 29, 1965.

Mark John Beufve, Chillicothe, Ohio, for appellant.

Clinton Ashmore, U. S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

It is ordered, That leave to appeal in forma pauperis is hereby granted. The order of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for a hearing as to whether the appellant was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence. Marvel v. United States, 85 S.Ct. 953.
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Clearing and Snagging (Code 326) 

Removal of specified vegetation along the bank (clearing)

and selective removal of snags, drifts, or other obstructions

(snagging) from natural or improved streams (includes

channels). 

Practice Information 

The flow area of a channel may become clogged by

various kinds of obstructions. When that happens, the

stream flow is reduced and some or all of the obstructions

may need to be removed. Clearing and snagging is a conservation practice used for that purpose. 

Special attention is given to restoring, maintaining, or improving the natural resources associated with

the channel. If after careful study it is determined that the work is likely to result in channel erosion,

impairment to fish and wildlife, or other adverse impacts, the clearing and snagging will either not be

done or practices to minimize such damages will be applied concurrently with the clearing and

snagging. In addition to onsite considerations, the downstream effects are also considered. 

Proper planning will result in measures and construction methods that enhance fish and wildlife

values, aesthetics, shade trees, and other natural resources in the channel area. 

Additional information including design criteria and specifications are in the local NRCS Field Office

Technical Guide. 

Common Associated Practices 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
---

Exhibit 12.2.

Certifications

I, John YC Myung, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Meridian
Co. Ltd. ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

By: /s/John YC
MyungName: Myung, John YC Title: CFO, Director Date: August
12, 2010

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Fence, Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control, Monitoring Well, Obstruction Removal.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# Arizona State Office

230 N 1st Avenue, Suite 509PhoenixAZ85003-1706

602-280-8801

AZinfo.nrcs@usda.gov

230 N 1st Avenue, Suite 509PhoenixAZ85003-1706

Arizona

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Arizona 
-  Arizona State Office 

**Our Mission:** We deliver conservation solutions so agricultural producers can protect natural resources and feed a growing world.

**Our Vision:** A world of clean and abundant water, healthy soils, resilient landscapes, and thriving agricultural communities through voluntary conservation.

## Welcome to NRCS in Arizona!

### Keisha Tatem, State Conservationist

NRCS in Arizona, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, serves diverse agricultural needs through 21 filed offices and a Plant Materials Center.

We Provide voluntary, cost-effective programs and technical assistance to landowners to conserve, protect and improve soil, water, air, plants and animals. In doing so, we enable farmers and landowners to better steward and manage their property and remain economically viable.

----

### 

## Key Contacts

### Media Inquiries

                -    602-280-8780 
                -    az-nrcs-publicinfo@usda.gov 

### Snow Survey & Water Supply Questions

                -    602-280-8834 
                -    Travis.Kolling@usda.gov 

### Urban Agriculture Inquiries

                -    AZUrbanAg.nrcs@usda.gov 

### General Inquiries

                -    AZinfo.NRCS@usda.gov 

### Updates and Issues with Arizona Web Pages

                -    AZinfo.NRCS@usda.gov 

### Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests

                -    SM.FP.FOIA@usda.gov 

----

##   Arizona State Leadership Team