7032 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Notices 

Water will not be needed to fulfill the 

purpose of the requested withdrawal 

modification. 

Records relating to the application 

may be examined by contacting Andy 

Senti, BLM Colorado State Office at the 

above address or by telephone at 303– 

239–3713. 

For the period until May 11, 2015, all 

persons who wish to submit comments, 

suggestions, or objections in connection 

with the proposed withdrawal 

modification application may present 

their views in writing to the BLM 

Colorado State Office at the address 

noted above. Comments, including 

names and street addresses of 

respondents, will be available for public 

review at the BLM Colorado State 

Office, at the address above, during 

regular business hours, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or any other 

personal identifying information in your 

comments, you should be aware that 

your entire comment —including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Notice is hereby given that an 

opportunity for a public meeting is 

afforded in connection with the 

proposed withdrawal modification. All 

interested persons who desire a public 

meeting for the purpose of being heard 

on the proposed withdrawal 

modification must submit a written 

request to the BLM Colorado State 

Director no later than May 11, 2015. If 

the authorized officer determines that a 

public meeting will be held, a notice of 

the time and place will be published in 

the Federal Register and through local 

media, newspapers and the BLM 

Colorado Web site at: www.blm.gov/co, 

at least 30 days before the scheduled 

date of the meeting. 

Licenses, permits, cooperative 

agreements or discretionary land use 

authorizations of a temporary nature or 

the disposal of the mineral or vegetative 

resources other than under the mining 

and mineral leasing laws may be 

permitted if the use is consistent with 

the management objectives for the area. 

This withdrawal modification 

application will be processed in 

accordance with the regulations set 

forth in 43 CFR 2310.3, et seq. 

Ruth Welch, 

Colorado State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02568 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLCAD01000L12100000.MD000015XL

1109AF] 

Second Call for Nominations for the 

California Desert District Advisory 

Council 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Department of the Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is 

to reopen the request for public 

nominations for the Desert Advisory 

Council (DAC). Council members 

provide advice and recommendations to 

the BLM on the management of public 

lands in Southern California. 

DATES: All nominations must be 

received no later than March 11, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent 

to Teresa Raml, District Manager, 

Bureau of Land Management, California 

Desert District Office, 22835 Calle San 

Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, CA 

92553. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen Razo, BLM California Desert 

District External Affairs, 22835 Calle 

San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, 

CA 92553–9046, (951) 697–5217. 

Persons who use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) may call the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the 

above individual during normal 

business hours. The FIRS is available 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 

message or question with the above 

individual. You will receive a reply 

during normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

California Desert District Advisory 

Council is comprised of 15 private 

individuals who represent different 

interests and advise BLM officials on 

policies and programs concerning the 

management of over 10 million acres of 

public land in Southern California. The 

Council meets in formal session three to 

four times each year in various locations 

throughout the BLM California Desert 

District. Council members serve without 

compensation other than travel 

expenses. Members serve three-year 

terms and may reapply to be nominated 

for reappointment to an additional 

three-year term. 

Section 309 of the Federal Land 

Policy and Management Act directs the 

Secretary of the Interior to involve the 

public in planning and issues related to 

management of BLM-administered 

lands. The Secretary also selects 

Council nominees consistent with the 

requirements of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (FACA), which requires 

nominees appointed to the Council be 

balanced in terms of points of view and 

representative of the various interests 

concerned with the management of the 

public lands. 

The Council also is balanced 

geographically, and the BLM will try to 

find qualified representatives from areas 

throughout the California Desert 

District. The District covers portions of 

eight counties, and includes more than 

10 million acres of public land in the 

California Desert Conservation Area of 

Mono, Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, San 

Bernardino, Riverside, and Imperial 

counties, as well as 300,000 acres of 

scattered parcels in San Diego, western 

Riverside, western San Bernardino, and 

Los Angeles counties (known as the 

South Coast). 

Public notice begins with the 

publication date of this notice and 

nominations will be accepted for 30 

days from the date of this notice. The 

seven positions to be filled include one 

elected official, one representative of 

non-renewable resources groups or 

organizations, one representative of 

recreation groups or organizations, one 

representative of wildlife groups or 

organizations, and two representatives 

of the public-at-large. These six 

positions became vacant on December 7, 

2014. The seventh position is a 

representative of the renewable energy 

industry. This position became vacant 

on January 9, 2015. The BLM was 

notified of this pending vacancy during 

the initial nomination period. The BLM 

is issuing a second call for nominations 

to notify the public of this vacant 

position and to reopen the nomination 

period for those positions listed in the 

initial call for nominations. If you have 

already submitted your DAC 

nomination materials for 2015, you will 

not need to resubmit. 

Any group or individual may 

nominate a qualified person, based 

upon education, training, and 

knowledge of the BLM, the California 

Desert, and the issues involving BLMadministered public lands throughout 

Southern California. Qualified 

individuals may also nominate 

themselves. 

The nomination form may be found 

on the Desert Advisory Council Web 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Notices 7033 

page: http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/ 

rac/dac.html. The following must 

accompany the form for all 

nominations: 

• Letters of reference from 

represented interests or organizations. 

• A completed background 

information nomination form. 

• Any other information that 

addresses the nominee’s qualifications. 

Nominees unable to download the 

nomination form may contact the BLM 

California Desert District External 

Affairs staff at (951) 697–5217 to request 

a copy. Advisory Council members are 

appointed by the Secretary of the 

Interior. The Obama Administration 

prohibits individuals who are currently 

federally registered lobbyists to serve on 

all FACA and non-FACA boards, 

committees or councils. 

Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–1. 

Teresa A. Raml, 

California Desert District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02550 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–895] 

Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills 

and Parts Thereof; Commission’s Final 

Determination Finding a Violation of 

Section 337; Issuance of a Limited 

Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist 

Orders; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has found a violation of 

Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the 

unlawful importation, sale for 

importation, and sale after importation 

by respondents The Brinkmann 

Corporation (‘‘Brinkmann’’) of Dallas, 

Texas; Outdoor Leisure Products, Inc. 

(‘‘OLP’’) of Neosho, Missouri; Dongguan 

Kingsun Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Kingsun’’) of Dongguan City, China; 

Academy, Ltd. (‘‘Academy’’) of Katy, 

Texas; and Ningbo Huige Outdoor 

Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Huige’’) of Zhejiang 

Province, China, of certain multiple 

mode outdoor grills and parts thereof by 

reason of infringement of one or more 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,381,712 

(‘‘the ’712 patent’’). The Commission 

also found defaulted respondent 

Keesung Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Keesung’’) of Guangzhou, China in 

violation pursuant to Section 337(g)(1). 

The Commission’s determination is 

final, and the investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on September 26, 2013, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of A&J 

Manufacturing, LLC of St. Simons, 

Georgia and A&J Manufacturing, Inc. of 

Green Cove Springs, Florida 

(collectively, ‘‘A&J’’ or 

‘‘Complainants’’). 78 Fed. Reg. 59373 

(Sept. 26, 2013). The complaint alleged 

violations of Section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the sale for importation, 

importation, or sale within the United 

States after importation of certain 

multiple mode outdoor grills and parts 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of the ’712 patent, the 

claim of U.S. Patent No. D660,646, and 

the claim of U.S. Patent No. D662,773. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation, as amended, named 

numerous respondents including 

Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, 

Huige, Char-Broil, LLC (‘‘Char-Broil’’), 

and Fudeer Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Fudeer’’). The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to 

this investigation. 

On January 9, 2014, the Commission 

determined not to review an initial 

determination finding respondent 

Keesung in default. Order No. 16 (Dec. 

20, 2013). 

On June 24, 2014, the Commission 

affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part an 

initial determination granting-in-part a 

motion for summary determination of 

non-infringement filed by Char-Broil, 

Fudeer, OLP, Kingsun, Tractor Supply 

Co., and Chant Kitchen Equipment (HK) 

Ltd. The Commission found that 

Complainants admit that the following 

redesigned grills do not infringe the ’712 

patent: (1) Chant/Tractor Supply’s New 

Model 1046761; (2) Rankam’s Member’s 

Mark Grill, Model No. GR2071001–MM 

(Ver. 2) and (3) Rankam’s Smoke 

Canyon Grill, Model No. GR2034205–SC 

(Ver. 2). Comm’n Op. at 1 (Jun. 24, 

2014). The Commission found the other 

redesigned products at issue were 

within the scope of the investigation. Id. 

The Commission adopted the ALJ’s 

construction of the ‘‘openable [] cover’’ 

limitations of claims 1 and 17 on 

modified grounds. Id. The Commission 

affirmed the ALJ’s finding of noninfringement of claims 1 and 17 for the 

Char-Broil Oklahoma Joe Longhorn 

Model 12210767 Grill and adopted the 

ALJ’s findings that the redesigned grills 

do not infringe claims 1 and 17 on 

modified grounds. Id. The Commission 

also found that the ‘‘openable [] cover 

means’’ limitations of claim 10 are 

means-plus-function limitations and 

directed the ALJ to make findings 

consistent with its means-plus-function 

interpretation. Id. at 2. 

On July 31, 2014, the Commission 

determined not to review an initial 

determination granting a motion for 

partial termination of the investigation 

based on withdrawal of allegations in 

the complaint concerning the two 

asserted design patents. See Order No. 

50 (Jul. 14, 2014). 

On September 26, 2014, the ALJ 

issued the final Initial Determination 

(‘‘ID’’), finding a violation of section 337 

as to respondents Brinkmann, OLP, 

Kingsun, Academy, and Huige based 

upon his determinations: (i) That 

certain, but not all, accused products 

infringe at least one claim of the ’712 

patent; (ii) that the domestic industry 

requirement has been satisfied with 

respect to the ’712 patent; and (iii) that 

the asserted claims of the ’712 patent 

have not been shown by clear and 

convincing evidence to be invalid. On 

October 9, 2014, the ALJ issued his 

Recommended Determination on 

remedy and bonding. 

On October 14, 2014, A&J filed a 

petition for review of certain aspects of 

the final ID’s findings concerning claim 

construction and infringement. On the 

same day, Brinkmann, OLP, and 

Academy together sought review of 

certain aspects of the final ID’s findings 

regarding validity. OLP separately 

challenged certain aspects of the final 

ID’s findings regarding claim 

construction and infringement. 

Academy and Huige petitioned for 

review of the ID’s determination (Order 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES