alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004284EN.01003101.xml

| 20.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/31

---

(2004/C 284/60)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 262, 23.10.2004

OJ C 251, 9.10.2004

OJ C 239, 25.9.2004

OJ C 228, 11.9.2004

OJ C 217, 28.8.2004

OJ C 201, 7.8.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
EXHIBIT 99



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                              By:/s/ Joseph J. Bouffard
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Joseph J. Bouffard
                                 Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer


                              By:/s/ Michael J. Dee
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Michael J. Dee
                                 Title:   Chief Financial Officer and Controller


February 12, 2003

                                       21
# C_2004217EN.01003301.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/33

---

Action brought on 21 June 2004 by Philippe Combescot against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-249/04)

(2004/C 217/59)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 June 2004 by Philippe Combescot, represented by Alberto Maritati and Viola Messa, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the conduct of Mr Combescot's superiors and its effect on his professional life, career and therefore on his state of health is absolutely unlawful and, in consequence recognise the right to assistance laid down by Article 24 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the conduct of Mr Combescot's superiors and its effect on his professional life, career and therefore on his state of health is absolutely unlawful and, in consequence recognise the right to assistance laid down by Article 24 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | declare the career development report (CDR) to be unlawful as a result of the serious and irremediable enmity between the applicant and his hierarchical superior; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the career development report (CDR) to be unlawful as a result of the serious and irremediable enmity between the applicant and his hierarchical superior;

| — | recognise Mr Cambescot's entitlement to compensation for loss sustained, both for non-material damage and in respect of his professional life and career, to be assessed in a sum not less than EUR 1 000. |
| --- | --- |

—

recognise Mr Cambescot's entitlement to compensation for loss sustained, both for non-material damage and in respect of his professional life and career, to be assessed in a sum not less than EUR 1 000.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant in the present case alleges that he suffered as a result of the conduct of his immediate hierarchical superior in the form of threats, intimidation and personal and professional humiliation during the period in which the applicant was a resident adviser to the Commission's Delegation to Guatemala. The conduct in question amounted to discrimination which damaged his professional life and had serious effects on his state of health.

The refusal to accede to the application for assistance within the meaning of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations should therefore be regarded as unlawful. The CDR for the period in question should also be regarded as unlawful.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LoyaltyPoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey S.
Benjamin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                         /s/ Jeffrey S. Benjamin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jeffrey S. Benjamin,
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


Date:  April 13, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Hope and others, Appellants, vs. Deerfield Auto Sales Company and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Doar & Knowles*of New Richmond.

For the respondents : *Helton & McGinnis*of Balsam Lake, attorneys, and Fisher, *Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

Regulatory Guides                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Row Arrangement (Code 557) 

Row arrangement is a system of crop rows established on

planned grades and lengths for erosion control and/or

water management. 

Practice Information 

The purpose of this practice is to establish rows in the

appropriate direction, grade, and length to provide

adequate drainage, reduce erosion, control runoff water,

and permit optimum use of rainfall and irrigation water. 

Row arrangement uses furrows to slow runoff and allow more moisture to infiltrate the soil. Arranging

rows on the contour can increase erosion if the rainfall amount exceeds the ability of the contours to

control runoff. Therefore, this practice is usually planned in conjunction with other supporting practices

that are needed in the event runoff exceeds the carrying capacity of the contours. 

State and local standards will specify requirements for row alignment when applied with or without

common associated practices. 

Row arrangement requires maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Row Arrangement (Code 557) is commonly applied with

other NRCS CPSs, such as Grassed Waterway (Code 412), Underground Outlet (Code 620), Lined

Waterway or Outlet (Code 468), Terrace (Code 600), and Diversion (Code 362). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# C_2004148EN.01000502.xml

| 3.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3443 - JP MORGAN / BRIDGEPOINT / SIUTSA)

(2004/C 148/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18/05/2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3443. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3443. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
# A Soil Profile

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  A Soil Profile 

Create a card showing soil horizons.

## Background

If you look in a soil pit or on a roadside cut, you will see various layers in the soil. These layers are called **soil horizons**. The arrangement of these horizons in a soil is known as a **soil profile**. Soil scientists, who are also called pedologists, observe and describe soil profiles and soil horizons to classify and interpret the soil for various uses.

Soil horizons differ in a number of easily seen soil properties such as color, texture, structure, and thickness. Other properties are less visible. Properties, such as chemical and mineral content, consistence, and reaction require special laboratory tests. All these properties are used to define types of soil horizons.

Soil scientists use the capital letters **O**, **A**, **B**, **C**, and **E** to identify the master horizons, and lowercase letters for distinctions of these horizons. Most soils have three major horizons -- the surface horizon (**A**), the subsoil (**B**), and the substratum (**C**). Some soils have an organic horizon (**O**) on the surface, but this horizon can also be buried. The master horizon, **E**, is used for subsurface horizons that have a significant loss of minerals (eluviation). Hard bedrock, which is not soil, uses the letter **R**.

## Project

Soil Profile Cards(114.94 KB)

              - Print the soil profile cards (above) onto cardstock paper or draw your own design on a 3" x 5" note card.
              - Cut the cards apart.
              - Attach a short strip of carpet tape to the card. Rolls of double-sided tape come in various widths. One-inch tape is adequate.
              - Pull back the tape at the top to expose some of the sticky tape and place soil from the surface horizon to represent the depth of this soil.
              - Pull back the tape for each additional layer one at a time following the same procedure.
              - You might also collect a little surface vegetation to keep with your soil type for learning about plant-soil relations.

You can demonstrate erosion severity by altering the depth of the A horizon or display various types for soils found in different locations.

Displays can be made of several soils on a drawing of a hill slope or other landscape by using the tape on a larger card or poster.

### Have fun with soils!
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 21-51027

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James Edward Cox, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:17-CR-346-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

James Edward Cox, federal prisoner # 33500-058, appeals the denial 

of his motion for compassionate release, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Cox contends that the district court neglected to 

articulate specific factual reasons reflecting that it had considered all seven 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51027 Document: 00516727373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2023
No. 21-51027

2

of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and that it misapplied those factors that it 

did consider.

We review the district court’s denial of a compassionate release 

motion for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 

691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). The district court was not required in its reasons 

for denial to expressly address each § 3553(a) factor. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Here, the record sufficiently supports the court’s 

conclusion that the § 3553(a) factors weighed against Cox’s release. See

Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018). His disagreement 

with how the district court balanced the § 3553(a) factors does not merit 

reversal. See Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 694.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-51027 Document: 00516727373 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2023
EXHIBIT 10.3

                               [GRAPHIC OMITTED]

              2200 W Cypress Creek Rd., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309,
                   954-351-2120 ext. 7402, Fax: 954-351-8823

ADVERTISER:    eDiets.com
               Ronald Caporale
               3467 Hillsboro Blvd., Suite 2
               Deerfield Beach FL, 33442
               Phone: 954-360-9022 Fax: 954-360-9095 email: rcaporale@ediets.com


TRACKING TO:   Ronald Caporale, Kendall Goodrich, 954-360-9022
               rcaparole@ediets.com, kgoodrich@ediets.com

CREATIVE CONTACT: Kendall Goodrich, 954-360-9022

PROGRAM DETAILS:
----------------
Flighting: April 1, 2001 - March 31, 2002
Net Cost: [_________]

CBS SportsLine.com to provide:

     o    12,000 Sign-ups to the ediets.com product (either the monthly rate or
          the one-time flat fee rate) over the term of the contract. Sign-up is
          defined by a processed (and approved) credit card. CBS SportsLine.com
          will exercise the right to place media and promotions wherever deemed
          necessary, within the SportsLine.com network, to achieve agreed upon
          sign ups.

     o    Sweepstakes: CBS SportsLine.com will create, host and maintain two (2)
          Enter-to-Win Sweepstakes. eDiets.com will provide mutually acceptable
          prizes.

Ediets.com to provide:
     o    eDiets.com will track all creative and sign-ups. eDiets.com will
          provide CBS SportsLine.com with weekly tracking reports.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
---------------------
Payment Terms: [_______] net due April 30, 2001. Remainder billed monthly.
Payment due upon receipt of invoice.
     o    E-mail tracking information/request to reports@sportsline.com
     o    Send high quality logo and all other sponsorship elements to
          sponsorship@sportsline.com
     o    Cancellation: Both eDiets.com and CBS SportsLine.com reserve the right
          to cancel with sixty days written notice.

SALESPERSON: Tiffany Boccuzzo

ADVERTISER'S SIGNATURE /s/ Ronald Caporale                        DATE  3/21/01
                       ---------------------------------------        ----------


SPORTSLINE USA, INC. /s/ Tom Arrix                                DATE
                    ------------------------------------------        ----------
                         Tom Arrix, VP Sales

SPORTSLINE USA, INC. /s/ Bruce Jaret                              DATE  3/14/01
                    ------------------------------------------        ----------
                         Bruce Jaret, VP Sales Services
                           and Operations
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,289
<SECURITIES>                                     3,733
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                      3,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,899
<PP&E>                                           3,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,130
<SALES>                                          5,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,513
<CGS>                                            1,544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004228EN.01003601.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/36

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 June 2004

in Joined Cases T-153/01 and T-323/01: Mercedes Alvarez Moreno v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Member of the auxiliary staff - Conference interpreter - Article 74 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants)

(2004/C 228/79)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-153/01 and T-323/01: Mercedes Alvarez Moreno, residing in Berlin (Germany), represented, in Case T-153/01, initially by G. Vandersanden and D. Dugois, then by G. Vandersanden, and, in Case T-323/01, by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially, F. Cloutche-Duvieusart and M. Langer, then F. Cloutche-Duvieusart and D. Martin) — application for, first, annulment of the Commission' letters of 13 and 23 February 2001 informing the applicant that it was no longer possible to engage conference interpreters of more than 65 years of age and, second, damages, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 June 2003, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application in Case T-153/01 as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application in Case T-153/01 as inadmissible;

| 2. | In Case T-323/01, annuls the decision of 23 February 2001; |
| --- | --- |

2.

In Case T-323/01, annuls the decision of 23 February 2001;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application in Case T-323/01; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application in Case T-323/01;

| 4. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs in Case T-153/01; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs in Case T-153/01;

| 5. | Orders the Commission to pay all the costs in Case T-323/01. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the Commission to pay all the costs in Case T-323/01.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 29.9.2001.

1

---