alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005019EN.01000803.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 2 December 2004

in Case C-97/04 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2000/76/EC - Incineration of waste - Failure to transpose)

(2005/C 19/16)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-97/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Amorosi and M. Konstantinidis) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, and G. Fiengo) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 26 February 2004 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and E. Levits (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and, in particular, Article 21(1) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and, in particular, Article 21(1) thereof.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2002.

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Brush Management, Critical Area Planting, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Early Successional Habitat Development/Mgt., Forage and Biomass Planting, Forest Stand Improvement, Forest Trails and Landings, Fuel Break, Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Range Planting, Sediment Basin, Silvopasture Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Access Road , Constructed Wetland, Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Dike, Diversion, Dry Hydrant, Fence, Fish Passage, Fish Raceway or Tank, Fishpond Management, Integrated Pest Management, Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation System, Surface & Subsurface, Irrigation System, Tailwater Recovery, Land Smoothing, Open Channel, Pond, Sediment Basin, Shallow Water Development and Management, Spring Development, Stream Crossing, Stream Habitat Improvement and Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Water Harvesting Catchment, Wetland Enhancement, Wetland Restoration, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Onas Jamal v. Woodbridge Crossing

Appellate case number: 01-16-00726-CV

Trial court case number: 1081258

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale

Date: December 4, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE & TIME:  Tuesday February 10, 2015 At 10:00 a.m. And Its 
Continuation On Thursday February 12, 2015 At The Conclusion Of The 
Open Meeting.

PLACE:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS:  This Meeting Will Be Closed To The Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:  Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Internal personnel rules and internal rules and practices.
    Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed 
Commission action.
    Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes or 
information which if written would be contained in such records.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-02436 Filed 2-3-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                November 9, 2006
            /s/ Stanley
              K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

Certain resolutions of the  Board of Directors of Parametric Technology
Corporation adopted at a meeting held on February 15, 2001 amending the
Parametric Technology 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan and merging it with and
into the Parametric Technology Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.


RESOLVED: That the Company's 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan ("1997
--------- Plan") is hereby amended and merged with and into the 2000 Equity
          Incentive Plan ("Equity Plan"), so that:

          (i) all shares of the Company's common stock heretofore available
          for issuance under the 1997 Plan shall be available for issuance
          under and on the terms of the Equity Plan; and

          (ii) if any option in respect of shares of common stock originally
          issued under the 1997 Plan expires or is terminated unexercised or
          is forfeited, the shares subject to such option, to the extent of
          such expiration, termination or forfeiture, shall thereafter be
          available for award under the Equity Plan;

          provided that:

          (i) the rights and privileges of holders of outstanding options
          under the 1997 Plan shall continue to be governed by the terms of
          the 1997 Plan as in effect immediately before this merger (as such
          options may be amended from time to time hereafter in accordance
          with the amendment provisions applicable thereto); and

          (ii) no shares heretofore available for issuance under the 1997
          Plan and no such shares that become available as a result of
          expiration, termination or forfeiture of an option heretofore
          granted under the 1997 Plan shall be issued under the Equity Plan
          (a) to persons of any class not eligible to receive grants under
          the 1997 Plan as in effect immediately before this merger or (b)
          in the form of any type of award other than stock options.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are 
available for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the 
Navy.
    The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 
8,227,651: HIGH DENSITY RENEWABLE FUELS BASED ON THE SELECTIVE 
DIMERIZATION OF PINENES//Patent Application Serial No. 13/426294: 
PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE SELECTIVE DIMERIZATION OF TERPENES AND 
ALPHA-OLEFIN OLIGOMERS WITH A SINGLE-STAGE REACTOR AND A SINGLE-STAGE 
FRACTIONATION SYSTEM//Patent Application Serial No. 13/426347: PROCESS 
AND APPARATUS FOR THE SELECTIVE DIMERIZATION OF TERPENES AND ALPHA-
OLEFIN OLIGOMERS WITH A SINGLE-STAGE REACTOR AND A SINGLE-STAGE 
FRACTIONATION SYSTEM//Patent Application Serial No. 13/426393: PROCESS 
AND APPARATUS FOR THE SELECTIVE DIMERIZATION OF TERPENES AND ALPHA-
OLEFIN OLIGOMERS WITH A SINGLE-STAGE REACTOR AND A SINGLE-STAGE 
FRACTIONATION SYSTEM//Patent Application Serial No. 13/604115: METHODS 
FOR THE PRODUCTION OF RENEWABLE DIMETHYL JP-10//Patent Application 
Serial No. 13/605436: EFFICIENT CONVERSION OF PURE AND MIXED TERPENE 
FEEDSTOCKS TO HIGH DENSITY FUELS//Patent Application Serial No. 13/
861198: RENEWABLE HIGH DENSITY TURBINE AND DIESEL FUELS//Patent 
Application Serial No. 14/171855: RENEWABLE HIGH-DENSITY, HIGH-OCTANE 
FUELS.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, Code 4L4000D, 1900 N. 
Knox Road Stop 6312, China Lake, CA 93555-6106.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Seltzer, Ph.D., Head, 
Technology Transfer Office, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, 
Code 4L4000D, 1900 N. Knox Road Stop 6312, China Lake, CA 93555-6106, 
telephone 760-939-1074, FAX 760-939-1210, Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Crude sulfate turpentine, a waste by-product 
of the kraft paper process, is a renewable and inexpensive source of 
terpenes, which can be converted, through catalytic dimerization, to 
high-performance renewable fuels having potential application as 
significant components of jet, diesel, and tactical fuels.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: January 23, 2015.
P.A. Richelmi,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01815 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```
Conservation Practice Standard Overview 

October 

2014

Conservation crop rotation is growing a 

planned sequence of various crops on the 

same piece of land for a variety of 

conservation purposes. 

Practice Information 

Crops included in conservation crop rotation 

include high-residue producing crops such as 

corn or wheat in rotation with low-residueproducing crops such as vegetables or 

soybeans. The rotation may also involve 

growing forage crops in rotation with other 

field crops. 

Crop rotations vary with soil type, crops 

produced, farming operations, and how the 

crop residue is managed. The most effective 

crops for soil improvement are fibrous-rooted 

high-residue producing crops such as grass 

and small grain. 

Perennial plants used for forage are very 

effective in crop rotations due to increases in 

organic matter and reduced soil erosion. In 

addition, crop rotations help break insect, 

disease, and weed cycles. Rotations add 

diversity to farm operations and often reduce 

economic and environmental risks. 

Common Associated Practices 

Conservation Crop Rotation (328) is 

commonly applied with practices such as 

Contour Farming (330), Cover Crops 

(340), Residue and Tillage Management, 

No Till (329), Residue and Tillage 

Management, Reduced Till 

(345), and Terraces (600). 

 

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office. 

Conservation Crop Rotation (328) 

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
#### Estate of Hellickson: Myra and others, Appellants, vs. Munson, Executor, and another, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Sanborn, Blake & Aberg*and *Edwin Conrad,*all of Madison.

For the respondent Munson: *Sauthoff, Hansen, O’Brien & Kroncke*of Madison.

For the respondent Peterson: *Roberts, Roe ■& Boardman*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

— Order and judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT C

                             SCHEDULE OF EXCEPTIONS

SECTION 3(4) AND 3(5)

         Debtor's October 25, 2000 Investment Agreement with Swartz Private
Equity, L.L.C. ("Swartz") contains a capital raising limitation which prohibits
Debtor from entering into certain transactions in which it issues securities as
well as a right of first offer for any transaction in which Debtor raises
capital. While Debtor has requested that Swartz waive the capital raising
limitations with respect to the transaction set forth in this Agreement and
decline to exercise its right of first offer, it has not yet done so.




<PAGE>
Exhibit
      32.1


**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger GP Trust, sole general partner of Tanger
      Properties Limited Partnership (“Operating Partnership”) hereby certifies, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for
      the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.








Dated:
      October 24, 2005   /s/
      Stanley
      K. Tanger


Stanley
      K. Tanger


Chief
      Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust


Sole
      General Partner of the Registrant
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 25,2008 accompanying the financial statements and schedule (which report on the financial statements expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph for the change in accounting principle related to the adoption of FASBInterpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), included in the Annual Report of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31911, effective July 23, 1997; File No. 333-67618, effective August 15, 2001; File No. 333-67626, effectiveAugust 15, 2001; and File No. 333-123616 effective March 28, 2005). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

March 25, 2008
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM June 2022

Clearing & Snagging 

(326)

D.2 (-) Soil 

carbon 

storage.

1. Channel free of major obstructions 

that limit flow

Initial Setting: Channel or drainage 

way where the removal of trees, 

brush, and other obstructions is 

needed to reduce risks to the 

human and/or natural environment.

Start

C.1 (+/-) Quality of receiving 

waters

I.5 (+) 

Undesired plant 

growth.

Critical Area Planting (342)

I.6 (+) Desired 

plant regrowth

C.4 (+/-) Income stability

C.2 (+/-) Air quality in the 

airshed

I.3 (-) Soil quality.

I.4 (+/-) Greenhouse 

gases.

Sediment Basin (350)

I.2 (+) 

Sediment and 

other 

contaminants 

to receiving 

waters.

Tree/Shrub Establishment (612)

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

D.1 (+) Surface 

runoff volume 

and rate.

C.3 (+/-) Biodiversity

I.1 (+) Soil 

erosion.

Pasture and Hay Planting (512)

Upland Wildlife Habitat Management 

(645)

I.7 (+) Soil carbon 

storage

I.8 (+) Soil quality

I.9 (+) Soil erosion

D.4 (+) Cost for 

installation and 

maintenance

D.3 (+) 

Channel 

capacity.

Open Channel (582)

Streambank and Shoreline 

Protection (580)

Integrated Pest Management (595)

Early Successional Habitat 

Development/Mgt. (647)

I.10 (+/-) 

Aquatic habit 

quantity and 

quality

I.12 (-) Net 

return

I.11 (+/-) 

aquatic and 

terrestrial 

species

Erosion and Sediment Control 

Measures

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
Memo to Docket 

Subject: Meeting Between Freeport McMoRan Miami Incorp. (FMMI) and EPA 

Date: April 29, 2014

Participants: 

Name: Organization: 

Ben Lippard V&E/FMMI 

Chris West FMMI 

Jeff Harrington AMEC 

Elliott Laws Crowell & Moring 

Jerry Roose FMC 

Eddie Al-Rayes Trinity Consultants 

Eugene Chen EPA Air Permits 

Geoffrey Glass EPA Air Permits 

Thomas Webb EPA R9 

Deborah Jordan EPA R9 

Nina Spiegelman EPA R9 

Charlotte Withey EPA R9 

Jay Spehar FMI 

Todd Weaver Freeport-McMoRan 

Agenda:

I. Introduction 

II. Technical Issues with the Proposed FIP for SO2 

A. Secondary Hooding 

B. Treatment of SO2 emissions from the converter aisle 

C. Estimation of baseline SO2 emissions from the converter aisle 

D. Cost Data 

E. Calculation of Control Efficiency 

III. FMMI’s BART Analysis 

IV. Smelter Upgrade Project as a Better-than-BART Alternative 

V. NOx Issue 

Summary: Please see “FMMI Presentation to EPA on Haze FIP.”
# Conservation Innovation Grants

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Programs & Initiatives 
-  Conservation Innovation Grants 

Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) is a competitive program that supports the development of new tools, approaches, practices, and technologies to further natural resource conservation on private lands. 

## On This Page

            - Contact Information
            - Related News and Events

##   Learn More About CIG

Explore the new CIG website to learn about funding opportunities, find grantee resources, access information about past projects, and more.

Visit the CIG website

## Ready to get started?

Contact your local service center to start your application.

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.  

----

## Related News and Events

Press ReleaseAnnouncing a Notice of Funding Opportunity for FY24 Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) in New York March 18, 2024

Press ReleaseNRCS Announces 2023 Rhode Island Conservation Innovation Grant AwardeesDecember 27, 2023

NewsNRCS Announces Recipients of State-Level Conservation Innovation Grants October 12, 2023

          -  View More News 
          -  View More Events
SkyRecon365

Mission Checklists

Arrival Checklist

1. If day and operating out of back of

vehicle, point vehicle into sun.

2. Remove case and place on level surface.

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or

controlled airspace using smartphone or

tablet app.

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver,

to contact tower of field if closer than 5

NM.

5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location,

and max height of flight.

Preflight Checklist

1. Remove transmitter.

2. Router - On

3. Transmitter - On

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up

5. Video Monitor - On

6. Remove UAS from case.

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. Micro-SD card - Inserted.

9. UAS Battery - Inserted

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and

recovery position if it returns to home.

11. UAS Battery - On

12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

13. DJI Application - Load

14. DJI application - Connect to Camera

15. SD Card - Format

16. Camera - Full Up

17. Satellite Connections - Verified

18. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight

19. Video Recording - Start

20. Takeoff

After Takeoff Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the

ground to confirm UAS is under control.

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover

- Verified

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up

2. Video Recorder - Stop

3. Landing Zone - Clear / Safe

Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to 

Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera

4. Takeoff

End of Ops Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops