6088 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices 

IV. Regulatory Assessment 

Requirements 

Certain Acts and Executive Orders 

EPA’s actions on State or Tribal leadbased paint activities, renovation, and 

pre-renovation education program 

applications are informal adjudications, 

not rules. Therefore, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L.104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to the requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

this action does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

This action does have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). Although this action is not a 

regulatory, legislative or policy action, 

and although this action will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law, this 

action may be considered an ‘‘other’’ 

action as included in the definition of 

‘‘Policies that have tribal implications’’ 

in Section 1 of Executive Order 13175. 

In the process that lead to this action, 

EPA adhered to the criteria in Section 

3, as applicable, in Executive Order 

13175. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental Protection, Hazardous 

Substances, Lead, Renovation 

Notification, Reporting and 

Recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: January 15, 2015. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02168 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0489 and 3060–0727] 

Information Collections Being 

Reviewed by the Federal 

Communications Commission Under 

Delegated 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collections. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before April 6, 2015. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0489. 

Title: Section 73.37, Applications for 

Broadcast Facilities, Showing Required. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 365 respondents; 365 

responses. 

Estimated Hours per Response: 1 

hour. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 Section 154(i) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 365 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $1,331,250. 

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality and 

respondents are not being asked to 

submit confidential information to the 

Commission. 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.37(d) 

requires an applicant for a new AM 

broadcast station, or for a major change 

in an authorized AM broadcast station, 

to make a satisfactory showing that 

objectionable interference will not result 

to an authorized AM station as a 

condition for its acceptance if new or 

modified nighttime operation by a Class 

B station is proposed. 47 CFR 73.37(f) 

requires applicants seeking facilities 

modification that would result in 

spacing that fail to meet any of the 

separation requirements to include a 

showing that an adjustment has been 

made to the radiated signal which 

effectively results in a site-to-site 

radiation that is equivalent to the 

radiation of a station with standard 

Model I facilities. FCC staff use the data 

to ensure that objectionable interference 

will not be caused to other authorized 

AM stations. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0727. 

Title: Section 73.213, Grandfathered 

Short-Spaced Stations. 

Form Number(s): Not applicable. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices 6089 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 15 respondents; 15 

responses. 

Estimated time per response: 0.5 

hours–0.83 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement; Third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 Section 154(i), 

55(c)(1), 302 and 303 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Total annual burden: 20 hours. 

Total annual costs: $3,750. 

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.213 

requires licensees of grandfathered 

short-spaced FM stations seeking to 

modify or relocate their stations to 

provide a showing demonstrating that 

there is no increase in either the total 

predicted interference area or the 

associated population (caused or 

received) with respect to all 

grandfathered stations or increase the 

interference caused to any individual 

stations. Applicants must demonstrate 

that any new area predicted to lose 

service as a result of interference has 

adequate service remaining. In addition, 

licensees are required to serve a copy of 

any application for co-channel or firstadjacent channel stations proposing 

predicted interference caused in any 

area where interference is not currently 

predicted to be caused upon the 

licensee(s) of the affected short-spaced 

station(s). Commission staff uses the 

data to determine if the public interest 

will be served and that existing levels of 

interference will not be increased to 

other licensed stations. Providing copies 

of application(s) to affected licensee(s) 

will enable potentially affected parties 

to examine the proposals and provide 

them an opportunity to file informal 

objections against such applications. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of 

the Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02243 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Notice of Agreements Filed 

The Commission hereby gives notice 

of the filing of the following agreements 

under the Shipping Act of 1984. 

Interested parties may submit comments 

on the agreements to the Secretary, 

Federal Maritime Commission, 

Washington, DC 20573, within twelve 

days of the date this notice appears in 

the Federal Register. Copies of the 

agreements are available through the 

Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov) 

or by contacting the Office of 

Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or 

tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. 

Agreement No.: 011539–017. 

Title: Norasia Group/HLAG Space 

Charter and Sailing Agreement. 

Parties: Companhia Libra de 

Navegacao (Libra); Compania Sud 

Americana de Vapores, S.A. (CSAV); 

Compania Libra de Navegacion Uruguay 

S.A.; Hapag-Lloyd AG.; and Norasia 

Container Lines Limited. 

Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; 

Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW., 

Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006. 

Synopsis: The amendment would add 

NYK as a party to the Agreement and 

revise the vessel provision and space 

allocation provisions accordingly. The 

Amendment would also increase the 

number and size of vessels the parties 

are authorized to operate, extend the 

minimum duration of the Agreement 

and delete obsolete material. The 

Amendment also changes the name of 

the Agreement, and restates the 

Agreement. 

Agreement No.: 012301–001. 

Title: Siem Car Carriers AS/

Volkswagen Logistics GMBH & Co. 

Space Charter Agreement. 

Parties: Siem Car Carriers AS and 

Volkswagen Logistics GMBH & Co. 

Filing Party: Ashley W. Craig, Esq. 

and Elizabeth K. Lowe, Esq.; Venable 

LLP; 575 Seventh Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20004. 

Synopsis: The amendment revises the 

geographic scope of the agreement to 

include Germany, Canada, and the U.S. 

East and Gulf Coasts. 

Agreement No.: 012315. 

Title: NYK/CSAV/Europe/North 

America Space Charter Agreement. 

Parties: Nippon Yusen Kaisha and 

Campania Sud Americana De Vapores 

S.A. 

Filing Party: Robert Shababb, 

Corporate Counsel, NYK Line (North 

America) Inc.; 300 Lighting Way, 5th 

Floor; Secaucus, NJ 07094. 

Synopsis: The agreement authorizes 

NYK and CSAV to charter space to each 

other for the transportation of vehicles 

and other cargo in the trade from 

Belgium, Germany, UK, and Spain, on 

the one hand, to the U.S. East and Gulf 

Coasts, on the other hand. 

Dated: January 30, 2015. 

By Order of the Federal Maritime 

Commission. 

Rachel E. Dickon, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02195 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 

225), and all other applicable statutes 

and regulations to become a bank 

holding company and/or to acquire the 

assets or the ownership of, control of, or 

the power to vote shares of a bank or 

bank holding company and all of the 

banks and nonbanking companies 

owned by the bank holding company, 

including the companies listed below. 

The applications listed below, as well 

as other related filings required by the 

Board, are available for immediate 

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 

indicated. The applications will also be 

available for inspection at the offices of 

the Board of Governors. Interested 

persons may express their views in 

writing on the standards enumerated in 

the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the 

proposal also involves the acquisition of 

a nonbanking company, the review also 

includes whether the acquisition of the 

nonbanking company complies with the 

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act 

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise 

noted, nonbanking activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding each of these applications 

must be received at the Reserve Bank 

indicated or the offices of the Board of 

Governors not later than March 2, 2015. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas 

City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice 

President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas 

City, Missouri 64198–0001: 

1. Citizens National Corporation, 

Wisner, Nebraska; to acquire up to an 

additional 0.16 percent, for a total of 

35.36 percent, of the voting shares of 

Republic Corporation, and thereby 

acquire United Republic Bank, both in 

Omaha, Nebraska. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, January 30, 2015. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02169 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES