alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE JUNE 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0001003950
<NAME>                                           PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                                    US
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                     13503
<SECURITIES>                                               10002
<RECEIVABLES>                                               3978
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                 3466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           31715
<PP&E>                                                      3888
<DEPRECIATION>                                              3011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             33550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       3090
<BONDS>                                                       12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      75
<OTHER-SE>                                                 30153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               33550
<SALES>                                                    13462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           13462
<CGS>                                                       5345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               5190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             3541
<INCOME-TAX>                                                1261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         2280
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.3
        








</TABLE>
# Standard Hero Widget

The Standard Hero widget allows you to add a hero image to a page with an option to add a title, summary text, and a button over the image. Desktop image size should be 1920x400 and mobile image is 400x400. This widget is used with the Data - hero page type placed under a folder.

button Text

# Hero, Image, and Map Widgets

### Content Width Hero Slider Widget

**Content Width Hero Slider******

# PROTECTING PEOPLE AND  THE ENVIRONMENT 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

# 

Learn More

----

### Image Slider Widget

**Image Slider **
Optimal image size is 1170x400.

          -    (Summary Text: 300 Character Limit.) 
          -    And Caption 
          -    Can Add a Caption 

----

### Map Widget

# NRC Style Guide Pages

### NRC Style Guide

### Band Widgets

### Card Widgets

### Form Widgets

### Hero, Image and Map Widgets

### Sidebar Widgets

### Specialty Widgets

### Two Column Page Band Widgets

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

____________ 

No. 09-3478 

____________ 

EDWARD LLOYD JOHNSON, 

Petitioner

v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 

____________ 

Before: SCIRICA, SMITH and WEIS, Circuit Judges. 

O R D E R

On the representation of the Attorney General that petitioner, Edward 

Lloyd Johnson, has been released from confinement, it is directed that the Memorandum 

and Order of this Court dated December 28, 2010, particularly Part II, is hereby vacated. 

 By the Court,

 /s/JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR.

 Circuit Judge

DATED: February 9, 2011 

SLC/cc: Regina Byrd 

John K. Grantham 

Allissa A.R. Pollard 

Steven H. Schulman 

 Lori Warlick 

 Jason Wisecup
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 7 October 2004

(2004/C 249/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted PursuantTo**

**Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daivd D. Lee, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                               |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the  Company for the periods presented therein. |

 
|   | /s/  David D. Lee  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David D. Lee            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 14, 2003         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135519 & (63)(64)(65) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135519 COA: 269887 St. Joseph CC: 05-013020-FH WARREN EDWARD ENGLISH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions fo r immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the De cember 4, 2007 judgment and order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by th is Court. The motion to reinstate bond is
DENIED.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY
, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration under the appr opriate standard, as explained in the partially dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, of wh ether the juror was ex cusable for cause.

p0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 6, 2008

Clerk
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
<PAGE>   1


           INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REVIEW REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 1, 1998,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended May 1, 1998 and May 2, 1997, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the three-month
period ended May 1, 1998, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended May 1, 1998 and May 2, 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

we conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
referred to above for them to be in conformity with general accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Autologic Information
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated December 10,
1997, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 1997, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.



                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

May 29, 1998
Woodland Hills, California
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2016

Critical Area Planting (342)

Initial setting: Sites with high 

erosion rates or physical, 

chemical or biological conditions 

that prevent the establishment of 

vegetation with normal practices.

1. Establish vegetation on disturbed areas

I.1 (-) Soil erosion

I.2 (-) Sediment in 

surface waters

C.1 (+) Aquatic health 

for humans, domestic

and wild animals

I.3 (-) Airborne 

particles

C.2 (+) Health of 

humans, domestic

and wild animals

D.1 (+) Wildlife food and cover D.2 (+) Plant 

productivity, structure 

and composition

D.3 (+) Soil quality D.4 (+) Air quality

(-) Particulate materials

(+) Visibility

(-) Greenhouse gas

I.4 (+) Air quality of 

the airshed

Start

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Diversion (362)

Obstruction Removal (500)

Subsurface Drain (606)

Underground Outlet (620)
# C_2004262EN.01000302.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 9 September 2004

in Case C-195/02: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/439/EEC - Driving licences - Mutual recognition - Compulsory registration and exchange - Conditions for the renewal of licences issued prior to the transposition of the directive)

(2004/C 262/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-195/02: action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations brought on 27 May 2002 by Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Castillo de la Torre and W. Wils) against Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad), supported by Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agents: H.G. Sevenster and S. Terstal) and by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agents: P. Ormond, assisted by A. Robertson) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, gave a judgment on 9 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting Articles 22 to 24 and 25(2) of the Reglamento de conductores (Regulations on Drivers), of 30 May 1977, and also the seventh transitional provision of those regulations, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(2) and 7(1)(a) of, and point 4 of Annex I to, Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 96/47/EC of 23 July 1996; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting Articles 22 to 24 and 25(2) of the Reglamento de conductores (Regulations on Drivers), of 30 May 1977, and also the seventh transitional provision of those regulations, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(2) and 7(1)(a) of, and point 4 of Annex I to, Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 96/47/EC of 23 July 1996;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191 of 10.8.2002.

1

---
# CA2004194EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 194/1

---

NOTICE OF VACANCIES

NOTICE OF VACANCIES

European defence agency

Directors

(2004/C 194 A/01)

The European Defence Agency intends to recruit four Directors for its four directorates:

| — | Military Capabilities Development (Ref. EDA/A/2004/012), |
| --- | --- |

—

Military Capabilities Development (Ref. EDA/A/2004/012),

| — | Research and Technology (Ref. EDA/A/2004/0029), |
| --- | --- |

—

Research and Technology (Ref. EDA/A/2004/0029),

| — | Armaments (Ref. EDA/A/2004/042), |
| --- | --- |

—

Armaments (Ref. EDA/A/2004/042),

| — | Defence Industry and Market (Ref. EDA/A/2004/051). |
| --- | --- |

—

Defence Industry and Market (Ref. EDA/A/2004/051).

More information (available in English) and application forms may be obtained on the Council website at the following address: http://ue.eu.int (contacts/job offers)

Deadline: 3 September 2004, the postmark serving as proof.

---
# C_2004239EN.01000201.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzhof by order of that court of 20 April 2004 in the case of Fleisch-Winter GmbH & Co. KG against Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-309/04)

(2004/C 239/03)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court, Germany) of 20 April 2004 received at the Court Registry on 21 July 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Fleisch-Winter GmbH & Co. KG against Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (Hamburg-Jonas Principal Tax Office) on the following questions:

| 1. | Is the fact that on the basis of investigations carried out by customs authorities there is a suspicion that a product is subject to a ban under Community law which prohibits the export of a product eligible for a refund from a particular Member State to other Member States and to non-member countries sufficient of itself to exclude the existence of sound and fair marketable quality within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/87 (1) so that the actual condition or marketability of the particular product is irrelevant? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the fact that on the basis of investigations carried out by customs authorities there is a suspicion that a product is subject to a ban under Community law which prohibits the export of a product eligible for a refund from a particular Member State to other Member States and to non-member countries sufficient of itself to exclude the existence of sound and fair marketable quality within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/87 (1) so that the actual condition or marketability of the particular product is irrelevant?

1

| 2. | Is confirmation of sound and fair marketable quality within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/87, given in a national application for payment, information for the purposes of the second paragraph of Article 11(1) in conjunction with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/97? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is confirmation of sound and fair marketable quality within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/87, given in a national application for payment, information for the purposes of the second paragraph of Article 11(1) in conjunction with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 3665/97?

---

(1)  OJ L 351, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2004140EN.01000101.xml

| 20.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 May 2004

(2004/C 140/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1989 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4404 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6732 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1243 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5382 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,301 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9462 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,586 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,896 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6564 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4261 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7081 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 633 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,135 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 858 818 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7217 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,658 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3285 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9747 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0558 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0774 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1989

JPY

Japanese yen

135,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4404

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6732

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1243

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5382

ISK

Iceland króna

88,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,301

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9462

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,586

CZK

Czech koruna

31,896

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6564

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4261

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7081

ROL

Romanian leu

40 633

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,135

TRL

Turkish lira

1 858 818

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7217

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,658

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3285

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9747

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0558

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,91

ZAR

South African rand

8,0774

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Weld Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation: Part II—Proposed Validation Procedure – Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-2228)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2228, Final Report (PDF – 9.00 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2020**Date Published:** July 2020

**Prepared by:**M. BensonP. RaynaudJ. Wallace

Michael Benson, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Under a Memorandum of Understanding, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Electric Power Research Institute conducted a research program aimed at gathering data on weld residual stress modeling. As described in NUREG-2162, "Weld Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation: Part I—Data Development Effort," issued March 2014, this program consisted of round robin measurement and modeling studies on various mockups. At that time, the assessment of the data was qualitative. This report describes an additional residual stress round robin study and a methodology for capturing residual stress uncertainties. This quantitative approach informed the development of guidelines and a validation methodology for finite element prediction of weld residual stress. For example, comparisons of modeling results to measurements provided a basis for establishing guidance on a material hardening approach for residual stress models. The proposed validation procedure involves an analyst modeling a known case (the Phase 2b round robin mockup) and comparing results to two proposed quality metrics. These recommendations provide a potential method by which analysts can bolster confidence in their modeling practices for regulatory applications.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 18 May 2004

(2004/C 139/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----