6694 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 5 Id.; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 6The all-others rate established in the Order. 

through April 30, 2014, at the following 

rates: 

Company 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Dubai Wire FZE ............ 18.13 

Precision Fasteners, 

L.L.C. ......................... 184.41 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit cases 

briefs not later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.4 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.5

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed hearing request must 

be received successfully in its entirety 

by the Department’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. The Department intends 

to issue the final results of this 

administrative review, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in any written briefs, not later than 120 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice, unless extended, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. If we continue to rely on facts 

available to establish Dubai Wire’s and 

Precision’s weighted-average dumping 

margins, we will instruct CBP to apply 

an ad valorem assessment rates of 18.13 

percent and 184.41 percent, 

respectively, to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were produced and/or exported by 

Dubai Wire and Precision, respectively, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of nails from 

the UAE entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rates for Dubai Wire and 

Precision will be the rates established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recently completed segment of 

this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for 

all other manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 4.30 percent.6 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: February 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Facts Available 

Dubai Wire 

Precision 

Corroboration of Information Used as Facts 

Available 

(a) Dubai Wire 

(b) Precision 

Duty Absorption 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–02453 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; Survey of the Need 

for the Improvement of the Infrared 

Reflectance Measurements Standards 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before April 7, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Leonard Hanssen, Sensor 

Science Division, NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., 

Stop 8442, Gaithersburg, MD 20899– 

8442, telephone: 301–975–2344, 

hanssen@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

NIST plans to survey members of the 

infrared optical properties measurement 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 6695 

community concerning their needs for 

standard reference materials, calibration 

services, workshops, courses, and other 

means for improvement of the quality of 

their measurement data and traceability 

to national standards. 

II. Method of Collection 

The survey will be delivered in 

electronic format as a WORD Form 

document. It will be sent as an email 

attachment to the survey participants. 

The participants will return the filled 

out forms to NIST, similarly via email. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0693–0065. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Businesses, academic 

institutions, and Federal government. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

30. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 30 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 15. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $1,500. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: February 2, 2015. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02340 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD756 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Initiation of 5-Year Reviews for 32 

Listed Species of Pacific Salmon and 

Steelhead, Puget Sound Rockfishes, 

and Eulachon 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year 

reviews; request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce 5-year 

reviews of 32 species listed under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (ESA): 17 evolutionarily 

significant units (ESUs) of Pacific 

salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.); 11 distinct 

population segments (DPSs) of steelhead 

(Oncorhynchus mykiss); the Puget 

Sound/Georgia Basin DPSs of yelloweye 

rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus), canary 

rockfish (S. pinniger), and bocaccio 

rockfish (S. paucispinis); and the 

southern DPS of eulachon (Thaleichthys 

pacificus). The purpose of these reviews 

is to ensure the accuracy of the listing 

classifications of these threatened and 

endangered species. The 5-year reviews 

will be based on the best scientific and 

commercial data available at the time of 

the reviews; therefore, we request 

submission of any such information on 

these ESUs and DPSs that has become 

available since the original listing 

determinations, or since the species’ 

status was last updated. Based on the 

results of these 5-year reviews, we will 

make the requisite determinations under 

the ESA. 

DATES: To allow us adequate time to 

conduct these reviews, we must receive 

your information no later than May 7, 

2015. However, we will continue to 

accept new information about any listed 

species at any time. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit 

information on this document, 

identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0021, 

by any of the following methods: 

• Electronic Submissions: Submit all 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal 

www.regulations.gov. To submit 

comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, 

first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon, 

then enter NOAA–NMFS–2015–0021 in 

the keyword search. Locate the 

document you wish to comment on 

from the resulting list and click on the 

‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right 

of that line. 

• Mail or hand-delivery: Dr. Scott 

Rumsey, NMFS, West Coast Region, 

1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, 

Portland, OR 97232. 

Instructions: Comments must be 

submitted by one of the above methods 

to ensure that the comments are 

received, documented, and considered 

by NMFS. Comments sent by any other 

method, to any other address or 

individual, or received after the end of 

the comment period, may not be 

considered. All comments received are 

a part of the public record and will 

generally be posted for public viewing 

on www.regulations.gov without change. 

All personal identifying information 

(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted 

voluntarily by the sender will be 

publicly accessible. Do not submit 

confidential business information, or 

otherwise sensitive or protected 

information. NMFS will accept 

anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in 

the required fields if you wish to remain 

anonymous). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Scott Rumsey at the above address, by 

phone at (503) 872–2791, or by email at 

scott.rumsey@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires that we 

conduct a review of listed species at 

least once every five years. On the basis 

of such reviews, we determine under 

section 4(c)(2)(B) whether a species 

should be delisted, or reclassified from 

endangered to threatened or from 

threatened to endangered. 

We will undertake reviews for the 

following 17 Pacific salmon ESUs: (1) 

Sacramento River winter-run Chinook 

salmon, (2) Upper Columbia River 

spring-run Chinook salmon, (3) Snake 

River spring/summer-run Chinook 

salmon; (4) Central Valley spring-run 

Chinook salmon: (5) California Coastal 

Chinook salmon; (6) Puget Sound 

Chinook salmon; (7) Lower Columbia 

River Chinook salmon; (8) Upper 

Willamette River Chinook salmon; (9) 

Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon; 

(10) Hood Canal summer-run chum 

salmon; (11) Columbia River chum 

salmon; (12) Central California Coast 

coho salmon; (13) Southern Oregon/

Northern California Coast coho salmon; 

(14) Lower Columbia River coho 

salmon; (15) Oregon Coast coho salmon; 

(16) Snake River sockeye salmon; and 

(17) Ozette Lake sockeye salmon. We 

will undertake reviews for the following 

11 steelhead DPSs: (1) Southern 

California; (2) Upper Columbia River; 

(3) Middle Columbia River; (4) Snake 

River Basin; (5) Lower Columbia River; 

(6) Upper Willamette; (7) South-Central 

California Coast; (8) Central California 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES