alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                       146
<INVENTORY>                                      6,732
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,119
<PP&E>                                          48,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,869
<BONDS>                                         22,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              557
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,176
<SALES>                                         57,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,767
<CGS>                                           49,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (36)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      89
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
# C_2005006EN.01000801.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 9 November 2004

in Case C-338/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen): Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Svenska Spel AB (1)

1

(Directive 96/9/EC - Legal protection of databases - Sui generis right - Definition of investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents of a database - Football fixture lists - Betting)

(2005/C 6/13)

Language of the case: Swedish

In Case C-338/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden), by decision of 10 September 2002, received at the Court on 23 September 2002, in the proceedings between Fixtures Marketing Ltd and Svenska Spel AB — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi and M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrators, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 November 2004, in which it has ruled:

The expression ‘investment in ... the obtaining ... of the contents’ of a database in Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be understood to refer to the resources used to seek out existing independent materials and collect them in the database. It does not cover the resources used for the creation of materials which make up the contents of a database. In the context of drawing up a fixture list for the purpose of organising football league fixtures, therefore, it does not cover the resources used to establish the dates, times and the team pairings for the various matches in the league.

---

(1)  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02382]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Corporate Administration Committee Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

TIME & DATE: 12:30 p.m., Thursday, February 12, 2015.

PLACE: NeighborWorks America--Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS: Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

CONTACT PERSON: Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-
4101; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f49e96868d879b9ab49a83da9b8693"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce6eefef5ffe3e2cce2fba2e3feeb">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 
I. Call To Order
II. Human Resources Updates
III. Executive Session: Presentation of Quatt Report
IV. Executive Session: Senior Management Compensation
V. Executive Session: Management & Board Assessment Project Working 
Session
VI. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02382 Filed 2-3-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2004190EN.01000801.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Consiglio di Stato in sede guirisdizionale, Sezione Quinta, by order of that court of 27 January 2004 in the case of SABA Italia SpA against the Comune di Bolzano and SEAB SpA

(Case C-216/04)

(2004/C 190/13)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Consiglio di Stato in sede guirisdizionale (Council of State sitting as a court) of 27 January 2004, received at the Court Registry on 24 May 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of SABA Italia SpA against the Comune di Bolzano and SEAB SpA on the following question:

‘Is the direct award, that is to say, in derogation from the procedures for the selection of contractors laid down in Directive 92/50/EEC (1), of the management of public pay car parks to a public limited company the entire capital of which is publicly owned within the meaning of paragraph 6(b) of Article 44 of Law No 1 of the Region of Trentino-Alto Adige of 4 January 1993, as amended by Article 10 of Regional Law No 10 of 23 January 1998, compatible with Community law, in particular with the freedom to provide services, the prohibition of discrimination and the obligation to guarantee equal treatment, transparency and free competition referred to in Articles 12, 45, 46, 49 and 86 of the EC Treaty?’

1

---

(1)  OJ L 209 of 24.07.1992, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 10, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC IV   
|                      | Assignor Corp.
#### Herreid, Acting Commissioner of Banking, Respondent, vs. Day and wife, Appellants.

For the appellants: /. *Charles Pile*of Dodgeville.

For the respondent: *Fiedler, Jackson & Boardman*of Mineral Point.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004277EN.01000501.xml

| 12.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/5

---

Renotification of a previously notified concentration

(Case COMP/M. 3535 — VAN DRIE/SCHILS)

(2004/C 277/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 17 September 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of a Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Van Drie Holding BV (Van Drie), Netherlands, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Schils Holding BV (Schils), Netherlands, by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 17 September 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of a Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Van Drie Holding BV (Van Drie), Netherlands, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Schils Holding BV (Schils), Netherlands, by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | This notification has been declared incomplete on 20 October 2004. The undertakings concerned have now provided the further information required. The notification became complete within the meaning of Article 10(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 3 November 2004. Accordingly, the notification became effective on 4 November 2004. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This notification has been declared incomplete on 20 October 2004. The undertakings concerned have now provided the further information required. The notification became complete within the meaning of Article 10(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 3 November 2004. Accordingly, the notification became effective on 4 November 2004.

| 3. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32-2 296 43 01 or No +32-2 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3535 — Van Drie/Schils, to the following address:





  Commission of the European Communities |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J 70 |
| B-1049 Brussels. |

3.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32-2 296 43 01 or No +32-2 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3535 — Van Drie/Schils, to the following address:

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J 70

B-1049 Brussels.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2004314EN.01001602.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 October 2004

in Case T-256/02, I v Court of Justice of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Action for damages - Exposure to asbestos - Occupational disease - Damage)

(2004/C 314/41)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-256/02, I, an official of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, residing in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), represented by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas, and K Delvolvé, lawyers, against Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for damages for the physical harm and the non-material, professional and financial loss allegedly suffered by the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002.

---
# C_2004228EN.01000602.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-345/02 (reference to the Court of Justice under Article 234 EC by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands)): Pearle BV and Others v Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten (1)

1

(State aid - Definition of aid - Collective advertising campaigns in favour of one sector of the economy - Financing by means of a special contribution payable by undertakings in that sector - Action taken by a body governed by public law)

(2004/C 228/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-345/02: reference to the Court of Justice under Article 234 EC by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings before that court between Pearle BV and Others v Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten on the interpretation of Articles 92(1) of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87(1) EC) and 93(3) of the EC Treaty (now Article 88(3) EC) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

On a proper construction of Articles 92(1) of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87(1) EC) and 93(3) of the EC Treaty (now Article 88(3) EC), bye-laws adopted by a trade association governed by public law for the purpose of funding an advertising campaign organised for the benefit of its members and decided on by them, through resources levied from those members and compulsorily earmarked for the funding of that campaign, do not constitute an integral part of an aid measure within the meaning of those provisions and it was not necessary for prior notification of them to be given to the Commission since it has been established that that funding was carried out by means of resources which that trade association, governed by public law, never had the power to dispose of freely.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

1

---
Conservation Practice Standard Overview

October 2014

Surface roughening is performing tillage 

operations that create random roughness of 

the soil surface.

Practice Information

Surface roughening is applicable on soils that 

have a surface layer suitable for clod 

formation and a high potential for wind erosion 

due to lack of surface cover. However, this 

practice is not intended for use as a primary 

erosion control practice.

Random roughness is non-oriented surface 

roughness often referred to as “cloddiness.” 

Such roughness is usually created by the 

action of tillage implements. The primary 

effects of random roughness are to raise the 

threshold wind speed at which erosion begins 

and to provide sheltered areas among soil 

clods where moving soil particles can be 

trapped. 

Common Associated Practices

Surface Roughening (609) is commonly 

applied with conservation practices such as 

Conservation Crop Rotation (328); Residue 

and Tillage Management, No Till (329); 

Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced 

Till (345); Cross Wind Ridges (588); Cross 

Wind Trap Strips (589C); Herbaceous Wind 

Barriers (603); and Windbreak/Shelterbelt 

Establishment or Renovation (380, 650).

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office.

Surface Roughening (609)

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
# C_2004300EN.01001401.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-409/02 P: Jan Pflugradt v European Central Bank (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff of the European Central Bank - Contractual nature of the employment relationship - Alteration of responsibilities laid down in the employment contract)

(2004/C 300/27)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-409/02 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged on 18 November 2002, by Jan Pflugradt (avocats: N. Pflüger) the other party to the proceedings being: European Central Bank (Agents: V. Saintot, T. Gilliams, and B. Wägenbaur,) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), K. Lenaerts and S. von Bahr, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Pflugradt to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Pflugradt to pay the costs.

---

(1)   OJ C 19 du 25.1.2003.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated March 18, 2005, accompanying the financial statements and schedule included in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-31911, effective July 23, 1997; Form S-8 No. 333-67618, effective August15, 2001; Form S-8 No. 333-67626, effective August 15, 2001; and Form S-8 to be filed on or around March 28, 2005 pertaining to the 2004 Stock Compensation Plan). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 24, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6331

PHILLIP E. HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FREDERICK COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER,

Sheriff’s Department; OFFICER MERCER; OFFICER

PERDEE; LINDA WEBB, Nurse; DOCTOR NOBI; ROBERT

HARGIS, State’s Attorney; RANDY MARTIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-243-DKC)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

February 28, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on March 1, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Hill v. Frederick County Adult Detention

Ctr., No. CA-00-243-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 1, 2000).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

Appeal brought on 8 April 2004 (Fax: 6.4.04) by Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG against the judgment delivered on 28 January 2004 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Joined Cases T-146/02 to T-153/02 between Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-173/04 P)

(2004/C 156/09)

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 28 January 2004 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Joined Cases T-146/02 to T-153/02 between Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 April 2004 (Fax: 6.4.04) by Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG, represented by its lawyer, Anja Franke, Grünecker Kinkeldey Stockmair & Schwanhäusser, Maximilianstr. 58, D-80538, Münich, and by Martin Augenanger, patent attorney, Maximilianstr. 58, D-80538, Münich.

The appellant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal alleges that the Court of First Instance infringed Community law.

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

----