alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004239EN.01002403.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/24

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2004

in Case T-92/04 R: Marta Christina Moren Abat v Commission of the European Communities

(Interim measures - Competition - Suspension of operation - Admissibility)

(2004/C 239/54)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-92/04 R: Marta Christina Moren Abat, resident at Brussels (Belgium), respresented by G. Lebitsch, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: H. Krämer, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for suspension of Competition COM/A/2/02 for the constitution of a reserve for future recruitment of administrators (A7/A6) in the Environment field, or alternatively, for the suspension of the validity of the reserve list of candidates of that competition — the President of the Court of First Instance has made an order on 9 June 2004, in which he:

| 1. | Refuses the application for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Refuses the application for interim measures;

| 2. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Reserves the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2196 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 629
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 115-346]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            October 11, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES.

    Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or to the Inspector'' and all that follows through ``such 
disclosures'' and inserting ``the Inspector General of an agency, a 
supervisor in the employee's direct chain of command up to and 
including the head of the employing agency, or to an employee 
designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for the purpose of 
receiving such disclosures''.
                                                       Calendar No. 629

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2196

                          [Report No. 115-346]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 11, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 September 2004

in Case C-386/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien): Josef Baldinger v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter (1)

(Free movement of persons - Compensation for ex-prisoners of war - Requirement to hold the nationality of the Member State concerned at the time of submission of the request for compensation)

(2004/C 273/08)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-386/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien (Austria), made by decision of 22 October 2002, registered at the Court on 28 October 2002, in the proceedings between Josef Baldinger and Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 39(2) EC, Article 4(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, and Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, refuses to grant an allowance in favour of former prisoners of war on the ground that the applicant did not hold the nationality of the Member State involved when the application was made, but that of another Member State.

----

(1) OJ C 7 of 11.1.2003.

----
Electronic Criminal History Records Checks in Electronic Information Exchange

Instructions

1. Go to the Criminal History page in EIE

2. Select the correct credential

3. Enter Password

4. Select “OK”

5. Read the Terms of Service

6. Select “I consent to monitoring” to proceed. If you do not give

consent, then you will not be able to use EIE.

7. Select “Continue”

8. Within the menu bar, select “New Submission” to display the “Criminal

History Submission” page Fill out the submission form

9. When submitting the fingerprint card for processing, please make sure the

top of the card has been completely filled out using blue or black ink or is

typed.

10. Attached one or more scanned fingerprint cards

11. Electronically sign the form by selecting “Sign”

12. Select “Submit” when finished.

13. The current fee is $10.00 per person checked through February 28, 

2022. The fee will increase to $35 on March 1, 2022. Pay using

Pay.gov or a check or money order made payable to “U.S Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission.”
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 209 

To improve the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s regulations 

on hazardous storage containers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To improve the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development’s regulations on hazardous storage containers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVING HUD HAZARDOUS STORAGE CON4 TAINER REGULATIONS. 

5 The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

6 shall prescribe, or amend existing, regulations to include 

7 as an exception from the definition of the term ‘‘hazard’’, 

8 as defined under subpart C of part 51 of title 24, Code 

9 of Federal Regulations, any stationary container which 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 209 IH

1 stores, handles, or processes hazardous substances of an 

2 explosive or fire-prone nature that— 

3 (1) has a capacity of 1,320 gallons or less; 

4 (2) is intended to contain common liquid fuels 

5 such as gasoline, fuel oil, kerosene, diesel, or crude 

6 oil; 

7 (3) is sited on land or property that contains a 

8 one- to four-family dwelling; 

9 (4) is intended to be used solely by residents of 

10 such dwelling; and 

11 (5) is intended to be used by residents of such 

12 dwelling exclusively for non-commercial, non-indus13 trial purposes. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management

# Fire Protection and Fire Research Knowledge Management Digest, 2013 (NUREG/KM-0003)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/KM-0003 (PDF - 4.36 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**January 2014

 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) knowledge management (NUREG/KM) publication series is intended to preserve the knowledge that has shaped the NRC's history and regulatory programs. The NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) Division of Risk Analysis (DRA) Fire Research Branch (FRB) has prepared NUREG/KM-0003, "Fire Protection and Fire Research Knowledge Management Digest," in order to collect and share over 35 years' worth of NRC fire related experience with the Nuclear Fire Protection Community of Practice across the whole of NRC.

NUREG/KM-0003 provides fire related information for three major subject areas: current nuclear power plants, next generation nuclear power plants, and non-reactor and nuclear materials. The document collections that are used to inform the three subject areas are grouped into several categories that include: regulatory publications, technical publications, and non-NRC external documents. This digest supersedes previous fire protection digests and DVDs provided at the Regulatory Information Conference, including NUREG/BR-0465, "Fire Protection and Fire Research Knowledge Management Digest," in their entirety.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that this
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                        By:  /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard
                             -----------------------------------
                             Name: Joseph J. Bouffard
                             Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer


                        By:  /s/ Michael J. Dee
                             -----------------------------------
                             Name:    Michael J. Dee
                             Title:   Chief Financial Officer and Controller



November 11, 2003
# C_2004314EN.01001902.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 October 2004

in Joined Cases T-117/03 to T-119/03 and T-171/03: New Look Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier Community figurative mark comprising the letter combination ‘NL’ - Applications for Community figurative marks comprising the terms ‘NLSPORT’, ‘NLJEANS’, ‘NLACTIVE’ and ‘NLCollection’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 314/49)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Joined Cases T-117/03 to T-119/03 and T-171/03: New Look Ltd, established in Weymouth, Dorset (United Kingdom), represented by R. Ballester and G. Marín, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto, J. García Murillo and S. Laitinen), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Naulover SA, established in Barcelona (Spain) — four actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 January 2003 (R 95/2002-1, R 577/2001-1 and R 578/2001-1) and 15 April 2003 (R 19/03-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Naulover SA and New Look Ltd — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 6 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 146 of 21.6.2003.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffEvidence Building Plan (NUREG-2252)

# Evidence Building Plan: Fiscal Year 2023 (NUREG-2252, Volume 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2252, Volume 2 (PDF – 1.18 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**September 2023

Office of the Executive Director for OperationsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the agency) is an independent agency established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, which began operations in 1975 as a successor to the Atomic Energy Commission. The NRC is required by the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 to develop an agency evidence-building plan. An evidence-building plan is a systematic approach for identifying and addressing priority questions relevant to the agency’s programs, policies, and regulations. More broadly, it is a coordination tool to engage stakeholders in evidence planning and building to help achieve an agency’s mission. The evidence-building plan is intended to emphasize and foster an agency culture of learning and continuous improvement. Once an evidence-building plan is implemented, decision-makers can use the resulting evidence to guide choices to improve the agency programs, policies, and regulations. The evidence-building plan includes nine priority questions to support agency needs and fiscal year (FY) 2022–2026 strategic goals and objectives. This FY 2023 update provides information regarding developments since the initial publication of the plan in FY 2022, including the status of the NRC’s actions established to address each of the priority questions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, January 25, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                               /s/ J. Ardie Dillen
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Name: J. Ardie Dillen
                                               Title: Chairman, President and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 14, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,034-02

EX PARTE RONALD J. EUBANKS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W92-67690 IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He

did not appeal his conviction.

On May 18, 2016, we filed and set the -01 application in this cause to determine whether

Applicant was entitled to relief under Article 11.073 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex parte

Eubanks, No. WR-82,034-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May 18, 2016) (not designated for publication).

Applicant has now filed a supplemental ground in the trial court and contends that his guilty plea was

involuntary. We shall treat his supplemental ground as a separate application.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Patterson, 993
2

S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

Applicant’s guilty plea was involuntary, as alleged in his supplemental ground. The trial court shall

also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

The issues shall be resolved within 30 days of this order. A supplemental transcript

containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any

hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of

law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 45 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time

shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 23, 2016

Do not publish
**Company Plant**  **Kiln Avg**  **(ppmd@7%O2)** Capitol CementSan Antonio, TX PH/PC 0.34 Alamo CementSan Antonio, TX PH or PC 0.46 Holcim Portland, CO PH/PC 1.10 Holcim Ada, OK Wet 1.42 Capitol CementSan Antonio, TX Wet 1.49 Holcim Ste Genevieve,MOPH/PC 1.55 Lehigh Tehachapi, CA PH/PC 2.56 National CementRagland, AL PH/PC 7.61 Holcim Catskill, NY Wet 9.11 Lafarge Harleyville, SC PH/PC 14.30 Lone Star Pryor, OK Dry, kiln3 15.07 Lehigh Leeds, AL PH 15.12 Lone Star Pryor, OK Dry, kiln 1&2 17.03 Ash Grove Louisville, NE PH or PC 24.70 Lafarge Alpena, MI Dry, K23 30.78 CalPortland Mojave, CA PH/PC, K1 55.37 **Avg of top 2 0.40**  **Avg of all 12.38**
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

October 23, 2014

via email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger

Acting Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Aeromexico, and GoJet

For Codesharing

Dockets DOT-OST-1997-3289

Dear Mr. Kruger:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

 Bob Finamore, DOT

 info@airlineinfo.com
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

1. Permanent earthen irrigation ditch constructed 

to convey and distribute water to individual fields

Irrigation Field Ditch (388) Start

I.4 (+) Plant health & 

productivity

I.8 (+) Agribusiness

D.1 (+) 

Infrastructure, 

pumping costs

I.10 (+) Soil 

quality

C.1 (+) Income stability 

(individuals & community)

D.2 (+) Water delivery to crop

I.1 (+) Cost to 

farmer

I.7 (+) Biomass

D.3 (+) Potential for 

seepage 

C.2 (+) Environmental 

quality

I.12 (-) Sediment 

deposition in 

watercourses

I.11 (-) Nutrients in 

surface and 

ground water

I.5 (+) Water 

quality

I.6 (-) Soil 

erosion

Initial Settings: All land 

between water supply and 

irrigated fields to which water 

is distributed

I.2 (+) Water availability for 

wildlife (temporally)

I.3 (-) Water for downstream 

uses. 

Irrigation Water 

Management (449)

I.9 (+/-) 

Farm/Ranch 

profitability

Irrigation Ditch Lining 

(428)

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

 Open Channel (582)
AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT STOCK FOR SERVICES



         This Agreement is entered into on April 25, 2001 by and between
Knowledge Transfer Systems, Inc. ("KTSI") and John S. Schoene("Shareholder").

1.        KTSI is a publicly  held company  currently  trading on the OTC market
          under the ticker symbol KTSI. KTSI was formerly known as GoThink!.com.
          Inc.

2.        Shareholder  has  provided  services to KTSI during the past 12 months
          either as an employee, contractor or consultant. The parties stipulate
          to the value of these services as being $27,500.

3.        Shareholder has not received any payment or other remuneration for the
          provision of these services to KTSI.

4.        As full payment of the services  provided by  Shareholder to KTSI, the
          parties  agree and stipulate  that  Shareholder  will receive  550,000
          shares  ("the  Shares")  of common  stock of KTSI.  KTSI will agree to
          register, on behalf of Shareholder the Shares under Regulation S-8, so
          that the Shares will become "free trading" shares.

5.        In addition to the Shares,  the parties  have agreed that  Shareholder
          will purchase an additional  2,000,000 shares (the "Purchase  Shares")
          of KTSI common stock at a purchase price of 5 cents per shares,  for a
          total purchase price of $100,000. The payment for such shares shall be
          made  in  the  form  of  a  non-recourse  promissory  note  issued  by
          Shareholder  in favor of KTSI which  note shall be due and  payable on
          December  31,  2003.  The  Purchase  shares  shall be  issued  by KTSI
          immediately,  but shall be restricted under applicable securities laws
          and shall also be subject to a "Lockup/Leakout" agreement with KTSI
          for a period of 24 months, in a form suitable to both parties.

6.        The  parties   both  release  each  other  from  all  other  forms  of
          compensation or obligations  except for the  obligations  specifically
          referenced  herein,  and Shareholder agrees that he/she has been fully
          compensated  for all  services  rendered  on  behalf  of KTSI,  or its
          predecessor.

7.        This  agreement  shall be governed in accordance  with Nevada law, and
          shall govern all matters related to the issues contained herein.

                                                Knowledge Transfer Systems, Inc.



                                                /s/Steve Burke
                                                ________________________________
                                                By: Steve Burke, President


                                                "Shareholder"




                                                /s/John S. Schoene
                                                ________________________________
                                                John S. Schoene