alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVED:OCTOBER16,2012
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF KEYSTONE LABORATORIES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0203
HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY G.IVEN that testimony and evidence will beheard and considered onJanuary 8 and 9, 2013, inclusive, inthe U.S. Bankruptcy Court\ Charles Evans Whittaker, United States Courthouse, 400 EastNinth Street, Kansas City, MO 64106. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the properpleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express m:ail, courier or postal service
..

# ertJc,~ Richard C. Goodwin · U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List

1Please confirm with the Claudia Wells, Assistant to the Court Clerk, the day ofthe hearing the exact· courtroom. 1.) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Adam D. Otto, 

### Respondent's Counsel Otto Law Office P.O. Box 1356 303 South Second Avenue West Newton, IA 50208 TEL: 641-792-7000 FAX: 641-792-7001 

### ONE COPY

Gayle E. Townsend, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Central Region, ACE? Federal Aviation Administration Room 506, DOT Building 901 Locust Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3766 FAX: 816-329-3771 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0203 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of
        Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
        2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. McFadden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)           
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 Date:
        December 20, 2007
 
 
 /S/   RONALD
                  P MCFADDENRonald
                  P. McFaddenChief
                  Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1940

CHERYL F. COHENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; BALTIMORE 

CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:11-cv-03419-WDQ)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl F. Cohens, Appellant Pro Se. Elise Song Kurlander, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl F. Cohens appeals the district court’s order 

denying her motions for reconsideration of the court’s orders 

granting summary judgment for Defendants on her employment 

discrimination claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Cohens does not challenge in her informal brief the 

basis for the district court’s disposition of her motions for 

reconsideration, she has forfeited appellate review of the 

court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Cohens leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                        Exhibit 11
                              RISCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Statement Re. Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


                                                                                            Three Months Ended March 31
                                                                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                                                            1999                   1998
                                                                                       ---------------        ----------------
                                                                                         (Unaudited)            (Unaudited)
<S>                                                                                 <C>                      <C>            
Net loss                                                                            $           (839)        $         (9,321)
                                                                                    ================         ================

Weighted average common and common share equivalents outstanding:

     Average number of common shares outstanding                                          36,868,114               36,868,114
     Restricted stock vested                                                                 479,167                       --
                                                                                        ------------             ------------
                 
    Weighted average common shares outstanding - (basic)                                  37,347,281               36,868,114
                                                                                        ============             ============

     Weighted average common and common share
           equivalents outstanding - (diluted)                                            37,347,281               36,868,114
                                                                                       =============           ==============
Net loss per common share--basic                                                       $       (0.02)          $        (0.25)
                                                                                       =============           ==============

Net loss per common share--diluted                                                     $       (0.02)          $        (0.25)
                                                                                       =============           ==============       

</TABLE>


                                       24
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


In connection with the Annual Report of PetroKazakhstan Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2005                          /s/ Clayton J. Clift
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name:  Clayton J. Clift
                                               Title: Senior Vice President,
                                                      Finance & Chief Financial
                                                      Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PetroKazakhstan Inc. and will be retained by PetroKazakhstan Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1084

JOHN EUGENE LEAKE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville

. Glen E. Conrad , Senior District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 00101

- GEC

- JCH )

Submitted : April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Eugene Leake, Appellant Pro Se. Brittany Johanna Gigliotti, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Eugene Leake appeals the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his Social Security agency appeal as untimely filed and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 (e) motion

. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2018) . The magistrate judge recommended dismissing Leake’s action as untimely filed and advised Leake that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that rec ommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Leake has waived appellate review by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Further, the district court properly denied Leake’s Rule 59(e) motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s o rders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-91316 and 333-102962) of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC of our report dated
February 21, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K,
and of our report dated February 21, 2003 relating to the financial statements of Kinder
Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., which appears in Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
February 24, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
 Date: November 7, 2007
    
    /s/ Steve Tirado

Steve TiradoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICER


OF AML
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC § 1350





Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officer of AML Communications,
Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





(a)
            The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 of
      the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(b)
            Information
      contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





Dated:
February 11, 2010





/s/ Jacob
Inbar


By: Jacob
Inbar,


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
Prepared by MerrillDirect





Exhibit 10.1


March 6, 2001


Mr. Vern Brunner

Brunner Marketing Solution

245 Maple Court

Lake Forrest, IL  60045


Re:        Natrol Engagement
Outline


Dear Vern:


As a follow-up to our telephone conversation of March 5, 2001, I have
outlined what we discussed with respect to your future role at Natrol.  It is divided into two component parts, but
as we discussed they tie in together.


First, we have offered you a position as a member of the Natrol Board of
Directors and hope you will accept. 
This is currently a vacant seat up for re-election on or about June
2003.  Our annual board fees are $12,000
consisting of a quarterly retainer of $1,000 and a $2,000 per meeting fee.  On an annualized basis this totals $12,000
(based on four board meetings per year). 
As we discussed, the term of a board seats is three years and, although
approximately nine months of the 36 months have expired, the board will award
you the full 30,000 shares of stock options. 
Stock options will be awarded at the price per share on the date your appointment
is formalized.


The second part of the agreement will be the annual consulting contract
with Brunner Marketing Solutions. 
Brunner Marketing Solutions will render services to Natrol and its
companies as follows:


1.          Your focus of attention will be on the
Natrol companies’ marketing, merchandising and sales plans and strategies.



2.          You will make yourself available to
confer and render guidance and advice with all top corporate executives,
including myself.



3.          Attend senior management meetings on a
quarterly basis, typically scheduled around the board of director’s meeting.



4.          Coordinate special projects and
assignments.



5.          Up to 45 travel days per year, plus
telephone communication as well as e-mails, etc.



For these services, Brunner Marketing Solutions will be compensated
$48,000 per annum to include all travel and associated out-of-pocket expenses
and 10,000 shares of stock options annually upon agreement renewal.  Stock options for consulting services will
be fully vested upon issuance.  This
consulting agreement is for a 12month period and may be renewed by mutual
agreement.


As we discussed, it is possible that the consulting agreement will be a
required disclosure on our annual 10Q. 
I would appreciate your acknowledgement that this is the understanding
in principle we have discussed.  Should
you find that an item has been omitted please feel free to let me know.





I would appreciate this acknowledgement as soon as possible so I can
secure final board approval.  We are
excited and anxious to get you on board.


Sincerely,

/s/ Elliott Balbert

Elliott Balbert, Chairman

NATROL, INC.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168 

To waive the passport fees for first responders proceeding abroad to aid 

a foreign country suffering from a natural disaster. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. BEYER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. ROYCE of 

California, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. CHABOT, and Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To waive the passport fees for first responders proceeding 

abroad to aid a foreign country suffering from a natural 

disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responders Pass5 port Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2168 IH

1 SEC. 2. PASSPORTS FOR FIRST RESPONDERS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1 of the 

3 Act of June 4, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214; 41 Stat. 750; com4 monly referred to as the ‘‘Passport Act of 1920’’), is 

5 amended, in the third sentence, by inserting after ‘‘to at6 tend a funeral or memorial service for such member;’’ the 

7 following: ‘‘from an individual who is operating under a 

8 contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with the United 

9 States Government, including a volunteer, who is pro10 ceeding abroad to aid a foreign country suffering from a 

11 natural disaster as determined by the Secretary;’’. 

12 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the end 

13 of the first full fiscal year after the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the 

15 Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representa16 tives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Sen17 ate a report on the number of waivers of fees for the exe18 cution and issuance of passports to first responders under 

19 section 1 of the Act of June 4, 1920, as amended by sub20 section (a) of this section, for such fiscal year. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Brush Management, Critical Area Planting, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Forest Stand Improvement, Forest Trails and Landings, Fuel Break, Integrated Pest Management, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Sediment Basin, Silvopasture Establishment, Structure for Water Control, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1939 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure equal access 

of Medicare beneficiaries to community pharmacies in underserved areas 

as network pharmacies under Medicare prescription drug coverage, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. GRIFFITH (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

equal access of Medicare beneficiaries to community 

pharmacies in underserved areas as network pharmacies 

under Medicare prescription drug coverage, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Seniors Ac5 cess to Local Pharmacies Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1939 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING ANY STATE LICENSED PHARMACY SERV2 ING AN UNDERSERVED AREA TO BECOME A 

3 NETWORK PHARMACY UNDER MEDICARE 

4 PRESCRIPTION DRUG COVERAGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4(b)(1)(B) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(b)(1)(B)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘DISCOUNTS ALLOWED FOR

9 NETWORK PHARMACIES.—For’’ and inserting the 

10 following: ‘‘DISCOUNTS ALLOWED FOR NETWORK

11 PHARMACIES.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(ii) INCLUSION OF PHARMACIES LO16 CATED IN UNDERSERVED AREAS IN NET17 WORKS.—In the case of a prescription 

18 drug plan that has, in its network of phar19 macies, one or more pharmacies located in 

20 a health professional shortage area (as de21 fined in section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public 

22 Health Service Act), in a medically under23 served area (according to a designation 

24 under section 330(b)(3)(A) of the Public 

25 Health Service Act), or among a medically 

26 underserved population (as defined in such 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1939 IH

1 section 330(b)(3)(A) of such Act), and 

2 that provides a reduction in coinsurance or 

3 copayments described in clause (i) for cov4 ered part D drugs dispensed through such 

5 pharmacies, such plan shall extend to any 

6 pharmacy located in such area or among 

7 such population the option to be an in-net8 work pharmacy with respect to such plan 

9 under terms and conditions (including the 

10 reductions described in clause (i)) com11 parable to those the plan has agreed upon 

12 with other in-network pharmacies located 

13 in such area or among such population.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to plan years beginning on or after 

16 January 1, 2018. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS