alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 2019

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Stream Habitat Improvement and Management

(Code 395)

Stream habitat improvement and management is the

maintenance, improvement, and restoration of physical,

chemical, and biological functions of a stream.

Practice Information

This practice applies to streams and their adjoining

backwaters, floodplains, associated wetlands, and riparian

areas. The practice provides for developing habitat for desired aquatic species and enhancing the

stream channel and associated riparian conditions important to aquatic communities. Planned stream

habitat improvements are based on an assessment of watershed, stream, and riparian conditions.

Riparian corridors adjoining the stream must be managed, as well as the in-stream habitat.

Establishment of an ecologically self-sustaining stream-riparian system consistent with the watershed

conditions and geomorphic setting should be emphasized. Operations and maintenance

requirements include the periodic inspection and repair of structures that are found to cause

excessive streambank or streambed instability. The stream and riparian habitat conditions are to be

monitored and evaluated to determine if they meet plan objectives.

Common Associated Practices

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Stream Habitat Improvement and Management (Code 395) is

commonly applied with CPSs such as Riparian Forest Buffer (Code 391), Riparian Herbaceous Cover

(Code 390), Tree/Shrub Establishment (Code 612), Aquatic Organism Passage (Code 396),

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Code 580), Fence (Code 382), Access Control (Code 472),

and Restoration of Rare or Declining Natural Communities (Code 643).

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             440
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,039
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             476
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               521
<LOANS>                                         27,456
<ALLOWANCE>                                        158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,544
<DEPOSITS>                                      17,675
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                557
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,562
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  44,544
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,197
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  496
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,693
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 617
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,076
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       11
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    489
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.08
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   148
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  158
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            158
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3
AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                        100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,551
<PP&E>                                           1,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,265
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,187)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,093
<SALES>                                          1,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,023
<CGS>                                              320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 24
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Trails and Walkways (Code 575) 

A trail is a constructed path with a vegetated or earthen

surface. A walkway is a constructed path with an artificial

surface. A trail/walkway is used to facilitate the movement

of animals, people, or off-road vehicles. 

Practice Information 

This practice is used where there is a need to— 

• Provide or improve animal access to forage, water,

working/handling facilities, or shelter; 

• Facilitate improved grazing efficiency and distribution; 

• Protect ecologically sensitive, erosive, or potentially erosive sites; 

• Provide pedestrian or off-road vehicle access to agricultural, construction, or maintenance

operations; or 

• Provide trails/walkways for recreational activities or access to recreation sites. 

The trail or walkway will be designed to accommodate the expected frequency of use and the type of

user. It will also have a surface that matches the usage. An infrequently used trail can be vegetated

with grass. A walkway that is used daily would have a hardened surface. If it is necessary to locate the

walkway in a wet area, an elevated boardwalk could be used. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 10 years. Maintenance of a trail or walkway can include

periodic grading or reshaping to maintain the designed grade or dimensions, replacement of surface

materials, reseeding damaged vegetation, and removal of manure accumulations. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Trails and Walkways (Code 575) is almost always

installed in conjunction with NRCS CPS Fence (Code 382) when used to facilitate livestock

movement. It is often applied with NRCS CPS Prescribed Grazing (Code 528) to complement a

rotational grazing system. Other commonly associated conservation practices are NRCS CPSs

Critical Area Planting (Code 342), Heavy Use Area Protection (Code 561), and Stream Crossing

(Code 578). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHILDTIME
LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 18, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-18-1997
<CASH>                                           3,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,556
<PP&E>                                          42,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,364
<OTHER-SE>                                         (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,543
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (77)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                       910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005006EN.01001501.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 28 October 2004

in Case C-360/03 Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/39/EC - Protection of the health and safety of workers - Risks related to chemical agents at work - Establishment of occupational exposure limit values - Failure to transpose throughout the territory of the Member State concerned within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 6/26)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-360/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and H. Kreppel) v Republic of Austria (Agent: E. Riedl) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 19 August 2003 – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermanns (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J. Makarczyk, P. Kūris and J. Klučka, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully with Commission Directive 2000/39/EC of 8 June 2000 establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully with Commission Directive 2000/39/EC of 8 June 2000 establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 1.11.2003.

1

---
# C_2004118EN.01000901.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Joined Cases C–162/01 P and C–163/01 P: Edouard Bouma and Bernard M.J.B. Beusmans v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Milk - Additional levy - Reference quantity - Producers having entered into a non-marketing undertaking - SLOM 1983 producers - Non-resumption of production on expiry of the undertaking)

(2004/C 118/15)

Language of the cases: Dutch

In Joined Cases C–162/01 P and C–163/01 P: Edouard Bouma, residing in Rutten (Netherlands), Bernard M.J.B. Beusmans, residing in Noorbeek (Netherlands), (legal representative: E.H. Pijnacker Hordijk) – two appeals lodged against the judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2001 in Case T–533/93 Bouma v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II–203 and Case T–73/94 Beusmans v Council and Commission [2001] ECR II–223 and seeking to have those judgments set aside; the other parties to the proceedings being: Council of the European Union (Agent: A.–M. Colaert) and Commission of the European Communities (Agent: T. van Rijn) – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, delivered a judgment on 29 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| (1) | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The appeals are dismissed.

| (2) | Mr Bouma and Mr Beusmans are ordered to pay the respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Bouma and Mr Beusmans are ordered to pay the respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 11.8.2001.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**StatementPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****By****PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer****RegardingFacts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings**

 

I, Jacob Inbar, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”);and

 

c)  presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:  August 12, 2003

 
|   |                                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Jabob Inbar                       |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                          
|------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
|                   |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Ley. ~l~ha (?~~~W~l'tf . . 1• · · ·\! ·1, 1 I j ,Kl , .,~,__,, ~ I l d 

From: _ :: .. cT OPERATIO~J:j Frank Smith <kittyvalet@bendbroadband.com> 

Sent· Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:23 PM 

To: [U i!. ! Q A iO: ? 41ey, Aloha (OST) 

Subject: -- Unnecessary grant request from the Central Oregon Air Service Team 

June 24, 2012 

To: ·Aloha Ley, Assoc. Director Dept. of Transportation's air service grant program 

Re: Grant request from Roger Lee, Central Oregon Economic Development for Central Oregon 

The local Chamber of Commerce has urged area citizens to flood your department with requests for public 

money to provide air service from Redmond, OR (RDM) to LAX. Our airport was doubled in size in the past 

few years during a period when Oregon's business climate deteriorated. The extent of that improvement was 

unfounded by economic conditions. Conditions in Oregon are even worse now due to unfunded public service 

pension accounts and future unaffordable energy rates due to eliminating high efficiency power plants. 

The departure of Allegiant Airlines was caused by their unprofitable operation here. United Airlines, through 

Sky West's regional, did provide service to L.:AX in better times than at present and also found little interest in 

that service. The LAX flights were then canceled. 

I have no reason to believe that demand for LAX service will be profitable for any carrier for many years to 

come. 

Thank you, 

Frank D. Smith P.E. (ret) 

2932 SW Cascade Vista Drive 

Redmond, OR 97756 541/923-8304 

1 

..
#### STATE v. EPHRAIM WOODFIN.

*Concealed Weapon.*

If one carry a pistol off his own premises, concealed about his person, for the purpose of hunting, he is guilty of a violation of the statute.

Indictment for carrying a pistol concealed, in. violation of the act of 1879, ch. 127, tried at Spring Term, 1881, of BUNCOMBE Superior Court, before *Bennett, J.*

On the trial the defendant’s .counsel requested the court to charge the jury that if they believed the defendant carried the pistol only for the purpose of hunting with it, and that he carried it openly and not concealed on his person for the purpose of hunting merely, he could not be convicted.

His Honor declined to give this special instruction and charged the jury, that it matters not for what the defendant carried the pistol, whether to hunt or for other purposes, yet if he carried it off his own.premises concealed about his person, he is guilty. If it was not concealed, of course he is not guilty.

Verdict of guilty, judgment, appeal by defendant.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*Mr. Johnstone Jones,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

The facts of the case are not set forth in the statement made up by His Honor, and we are left to infer what they were from the special instructions asked by the defendant, and the charge to the jury.

From these we infer the defendant went hunting with a pistol in his pocket, or concealed about his person. If so he was clearly guilty of a violation of the statute.

*527There is no error in the refusal of the court to give the instructions asked ; and while we think he laid down the law somewhat too broadly in his charge to the jury, yet so far as it applied to the supposed facts of the case, it ivas not erroneous.

No error. Affirmed.