alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 14, 2008 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered September 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00215-CR

BRIAN MARTIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31995CC

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s September 18, 2014 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd Waltz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 28, 2010/s/ Todd WaltzTodd WaltzChief Executive Officer
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Land Reclamation Landslide Treatment (Code

453) 

Landslide treatment is used when stabilizing or managing

in-place natural materials, mine spoil, mine waste, or

overburden to reduce downslope movement. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to the construction, grading, and

reshaping of land where in-place material, mine spoil,

waste or overburden, or rock-cut road banks are unstable, moving, or judged to have potential of

moving downslope in a manner that will cause damage to life, property, or the environment. It does

not apply to constructed embankment surfaces such as road fills, dams, dikes, levees, and terraces. 

The purpose of landslide treatment is to stabilize the area and restore it to a productive, economic

use. Sources of water that will enter the landslide area will be controlled to the extent possible using

diversions and subsurface drainage. Vegetation will be planted using selected soilbioengineering

slope-stabilization techniques appropriate to the site. 

Operation and maintenance requirements will include periodic inspections with prompt repair of

damaged areas and monitoring to ensure the continued success of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment (453) is commonly applied with conservation practices such

as Critical Area Planting (342), Obstruction Removal (500), Pest Management (595), Land

Reclamation, Currently Mined Land (544), Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control (455), Nutrient

Management (590), Terrace (600), Subsurface Drain (606), Underground Outlet (620). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40274 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NORBERTO MONTALVO, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-95-CV-257 (M-92-CR-71-2)

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Norberto Montalvo, Jr., # 40684-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that the forfeiture of his real property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7), in addition to his convictions and sentences for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, constituted double punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. His argument is without merit. See United States v. Ursery , 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2149 (1996).No. - 2 -
AFFIRMED.
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Saturated Buffer (Code 604) 

A saturated buffer is a vegetated, riparian buffer in which

the water table is artificially raised by diverting much of the

water from a subsurface drainage system along the buffer

to reduce nitrate loading to surface water through

enhanced denitrification. 

Practice Information 

The saturated buffer is one of several practices that may be

used to help prevent excessive nitrate contribution from tile

drainage water leaving crop fields. 

Typically, the saturated buffer is implemented by providing a secondary outlet for a subsurface

drainage system. This is accomplished by installing a water control structure in the main drainage

outlet. The structure diverts the flow from the tile outlet to a lateral, perforated distribution line running

parallel to the watercourse, along the field edge of the vegetated buffer strip. During periods of high

flow in the tile system, the structure is set to bypass excess flow to the main drainage outlet. As the

drain water is introduced to the buffer through the distribution line, the soil becomes saturated,

allowing vegetation and denitrifying soil organisms to remove nitrates from the water before it is

discharged into streams. 

 An onsite soil investigation is critical to good saturated buffer planning and design. The amount of

organic matter in the soil and the presence of a restrictive layer are critical to the function of the

saturated buffer. The buffer should be at least 30-feet wide, and have vigorously growing herbaceous

or woody shrubs and trees, or a combination of the two. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Saturated Buffer (Code 604) is a part of an overall

strategy to reduce nitrate export to surface water. Saturated buffers work well in conjunction with a

strategy of the four ‘4-R’s’ of nutrient management detailed in NRCS CPS Nutrient Management

(Code 590). Applying nutrients from the right source, at the right rate, and the right time in the right

place minimizes the amount of nutrients in the drainage water. 

CPS Drainage Water Management (Code 554) can also be successfully used together in the

conservation system. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
#### Petersen and wife, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Krugmeier & Witmer*of Appleton.

For the respondents Industrial Commission and State of Wisconsin: *Orland S. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents Olson Transportation Company and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company: *Alfred E. La France*of Racine.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NextPhase Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form
  10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Hemingway, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:
  1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 November
      19, 2008
              /s/ Thomas
      HemingwayThomas
      HemingwayChief
      Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
HomeRadioactive WasteLow-Level Waste Disposal

# Low-Level Waste Disposal Oversight

The three operating low-level radioactive waste disposal sites in the U.S. are regulated by Agreement States (Utah, South Carolina, and Washington). Each State has an oversight program that consists of periodic inspections of the facilities. The inspectors examine whether incoming shipments are properly documented and analyzed for their radioactive material content. They also ensure that licensees properly implement the radiation safety and waste disposal requirements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Low-Level Waste Disposal Regulations, Guidance, and Communications
          - Licensing
          - Oversight
          - Decision Support
          - Public Outreach
          - Low-Level Waste Disposal Under 10 CFR 20.2002
          - 10 CFR 20.2002 Process for Alternative Disposals
          - Very Low Level Waste
          - Transfer of Very Low-Level Waste to Exempt Persons for Disposal

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
Opinion issued August 27, 2013

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-12-01104-CV

IN RE BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Barry Dwayne Minnfee, “prays 

that mandamus is enforced to answer appellant’s brief filed 11/05/12” in cause no 

01-12-00943-CV, Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. Stephanie Proyer and Federal Bureau 

of Investigation. However, cause number 01-12-00943-CV was dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction by this Court on February 26, 2013. See Barry Dwayne 

Minnfee v. Stephanie Proyer and Federal Bureau of Investigation, No. 01-12-
2

00943-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] February 26, 2013, no pet.) (not designated 

for publication). Because the appeal in which relator wishes to compel a response has 

been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is 

moot. 

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. All pending motions 

are overruled as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Sharp.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Cross Wind Ridges, Cross Wind Trap Strips, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Deep Tillage, Dike, Diversion, Drainage Water Management, Filter Strip, Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Subsurface Drain, Surface Drainage, Main or Lateral, Underground Outlet.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        13230883
<SECURITIES>                                  68933670
<RECEIVABLES>                                167400565
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2111772
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3736953
<PP&E>                                         2746630
<DEPRECIATION>                                  239725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               283943359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        231398525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3240000
<OTHER-SE>                                    48653721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 283943359
<SALES>                                        3386255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4678198
<CGS>                                          1400906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3277292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1537129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 41000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2011250
<INCOME-TAX>                                    704925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1306325
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Occupational Radiation Exposure at Agreement State-Licensed Materials Facilities, 1997-2010 (NUREG-2118, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2118, Volume 1 (PDF - 31.08 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2012 **Date Published:** July 2012

**Prepared by:** D.E. Lewis  D.A. Hagemeyer  Y.U. McCormick

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 32.2
                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (i)  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  of the  Operating
          Partnership  for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2004 (the
          "Report")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated: November 8, 2004       /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
       ----------------       ------------------------------------
                              Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                              Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust
                              Sole General Partner of the Registrant
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,766,036
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,645,094
<PP&E>                                         1,736,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 521,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,674,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          338,151
<BONDS>                                        802,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       56,069
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,674,364
<SALES>                                        216,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,240
<CGS>                                          55,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,348,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,828,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,828,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,828,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.50)
        


</TABLE>
February 28, 2012

Mr. Baruch Marom Gulfstream Aerospace LP

P.O. Box 1036 Airport City 70100

Israel

Dear Mr. Marom:

This is in response to your November 10, 2011, petition for exemption sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-1271) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP), for an exemption from § 21.213(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow GALP to apply for a Class II provisional airworthiness certificate.

On January 19, 2012, you submitted another petition for exemption to the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0061) requesting relief from § 21.195(a). If granted, that exemption from § 21.195(a) of would allow GALP to allow a non-United States manufacturer the ability to obtain an experiment certificate for aircraft to be used for market surveys, sales demonstrations and customer crew training.

The FAA will address your first request dated November 10, 2011 (No. FAA-2011-1271), in the response to docket No. FAA-2012-0061, submitted January 19, 2012.

We will take no further action on your petition submitted to public docket no. FAA-2011-1271.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActFOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

# ET Transcripts

Below are transcripts of audio files from the telephone lines recorded in the agency's Headquarters Operations Center that are responsive to FOIA requests for any and all documents related to the agency's activities in response to the Fukushima, Japan tsunami and subsequent disaster. These transcripts have been redacted for information that is exempt from release, and such redactions have been marked with the applicable FOIA exemption.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021