alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004276EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 November 2004

(2004/C 276/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2977 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,431 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6987 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0665 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5222 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,178 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5775 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,425 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6806 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4318 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2599 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 520 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,63 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 887 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7005 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5489 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0961 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8858 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,147 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 440,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9972 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2977

JPY

Japanese yen

137,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,431

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6987

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0665

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5222

ISK

Iceland króna

87,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,178

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5775

CZK

Czech koruna

31,425

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6806

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4318

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2599

ROL

Romanian leu

40 520

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,63

TRL

Turkish lira

1 887 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7005

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5489

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0961

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8858

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,147

KRW

South Korean won

1 440,42

ZAR

South African rand

7,9972

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2005042EN.01003101.xml

| 18.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/31

---

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

(2005/C 42/11)

The European Parliament Secretariat is organising the following selection procedure:

| PE/91/S | — | TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR (A*10/AD10)
  Parliamentary Assistance/Budget Affairs (1) |
| --- | --- | --- |

PE/91/S

—

TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR (A*10/AD10)

TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR

Parliamentary Assistance/Budget Affairs (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C 42 A, 18.2.2005 (French and English edition).

1

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Pumping Plant.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
**Exhibit12.1****COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP****Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges***(alldollar amounts in thousands)*                       **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2007**  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003** **Earnings:**                    Pre-tax income (loss) beforeadjustment for minority interestin consolidated subsidiaries orincome, loss from equityinvestees,extraordinary gain or loss, orgains on sale of properties $(79,436) $(13,083) $(36,567) $4,448  $11,267 Amortization of interest capitalized  2,700   2,400   1,800   1,700   1,500 Interest capitalized  (27,105)  (17,063)  (6,907)  (5,576)  (8,064)Distributed income of equity investees  13,207   9,370   3,588   2,148   2,073 Fixed charges  122,996   151,425   90,310   76,243   76,889                         Total earnings $32,362  $133,049  $52,224  $78,963  $83,665                         **Fixed Charges:**                    Interest expense  89,105   127,778   79,136   67,556   65,265 Capitalized interest  27,105   17,063   6,907   5,576   8,064 Debt costs amortization  6,786   6,584   4,267   3,111   3,560                         Total Fixed Charges $122,996  $151,425  $90,310  $76,243  $76,889     **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  (a)  (a)  (a)  1.0   1.1     a) For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the aggregate amount offixed charges exceeded our earnings by approximately $90.6, $18.4 million and $38.1million, respectively, which is the amount of additional earnings that would have beenrequired to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.0x for such period. Thedeficiency of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the twelve months endedDecember 31, 2007 is primarily due to the assets sold as a part of the joint venturetransactions related to our strategic initiative and to the $43.3 million non-cashimpairment charge related to CRLP’s for-sale residential business. The deficiency of theratio of earnings to fixed charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 isprimarily due to the classification of operations for assets held for sale and sold asdiscontinued operations. The deficiency of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges forthe twelve months ended December 31, 2005, is primarily due to the classification ofoperations for assets held for sale and sold as discontinued operations and amortizationof intangible assets acquired in the Cornerstone merger.The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings by fixedcharges. For this purpose, earnings consist of pre-tax income from continuing operationsbefore adjustment for minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries or income or lossfrom equity investees, gains on sale of properties, distributed income of equityinvestees, fixed charges and amortization of capitalized interest excluding interest costscapitalized. Fixed charges consist of interest expense (including interest costscapitalized) and amortization of debt issuance costs.
# C_2004217EN.01000402.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 July 2004

Case C-27/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Member State's failure to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 91/271/EEC - Decision 93/481/EEC - Collection and treatment of urban waste water - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2004/C 217/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-27/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and M. van Beek) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: A. Snoecx, assisted by A. Cornet) — application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to the full implementing of Articles 3, 5 and 17 — the last being read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 4 — of Directive 91/271/EEC of the Council of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), and of Commission Decision 93/481/EEC of 28 July 1993 concerning formats for the presentation of national programmes as foreseen by Article 17 of Directive 91/271/EEC (OJ 1993 L 226, p. 23), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and that decision — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 July 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to the full implementing of Articles 3, 5 and 17 — the last being read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 4 — of Directive 91/271/EEC of the Council of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), and of Commission Decision 93/481/EEC of 28 July 1993 concerning formats for the presentation of national programmes as foreseen by Article 17 of Directive 91/271/EEC (OJ 1993 L 226, p. 23), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 226 EC and under that directive and that decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to the full implementing of Articles 3, 5 and 17 — the last being read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 4 — of Directive 91/271/EEC of the Council of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), and of Commission Decision 93/481/EEC of 28 July 1993 concerning formats for the presentation of national programmes as foreseen by Article 17 of Directive 91/271/EEC (OJ 1993 L 226, p. 23), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 226 EC and under that directive and that decision.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 70 of 22 March 2003.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No.333-122055, Form S-3 No. 333-63918, Form S-3 No. 333-40451, Form S-8 No. 333-37537, Form S-3 No.333-78061, Form S-8 No. 333-82513, Form S-8 No. 333-44326 and Form S-3 No. 333-49418) of ArdenRealty, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 10, 2005, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Arden Realty, Inc., Arden Realty, Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Arden Realty, Inc. included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
#### Nuss, Appellant, vs. Chicago *&*Northwestern Railway Company and another, imp., Respondents.

*April 26*

May *15, 1917.*

*Peters v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., ante,*p. 529, followed.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha county: .Mahtin L. Luecic, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The appeal is from an order sustaining a general demurrer to *the*complaint.

For the appellant there was a brief by *C. E. Armin*of Waukesha and *Gliclcsman, Gold S Corrigan*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Arthur J. Pellette*of Milwaukee, of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Pel-lette.*

*536*R. N. Van Doren*of Milwaukee, for the respondent *Chicago é Northwestern Railway Company.*

For the respondent *Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company*the cause was submitted on the brief of TP. *A. Rayes*of Milwaukee.

Marshall, J.

The questions presented here are identical with those in *Peters v. C. & N. W. R. Co., ante,*p. 529, 162 N. W. 916, and the appeal is ruled in favor of respondents by the result in that case.

*By the Court.*— The order is affirmed, and the cause remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion, one bill of costs to be taxed in each case.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 2, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. FNBK Holdings, Inc., Dallas, Texas; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The First 
National Bank of Kemp, Kemp, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Banner Corporation and Banner Merger Sub, LLC, both of Walla 
Walla, Washington; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Starbuck Bancshares, Inc., Seattle, Washington, and thereby indirectly 
acquire American West Bank, Spokane, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-02288 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2204

Lower Tribunal No. 21-CA-001111

_____________________________

MIKA COATES and NUZHAT COATES,

Appellants, 

v.

ANTHONY SPOTO and SHARON SPOTO,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Joseph C. Fuller, Judge.

January 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WHITE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Christian W. Waugh, and Mary A. Norberg, of Waugh, PLLC, Orlando, for 

Appellants.

Trisha L. Ryan, of Lusk, Drasites & Tolisano, P.A., Cape Coral, for Appellees.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3987 Dir iD: 2015 - NM - 066 - AD
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

▲★

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1491 

CA 12-00513 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

MARK HESS AND GAIL HESS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF MARILYN HESS, 

AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, 

V ORDER

GARY NELSON AND LYNN NELSON, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

THE CAREY FIRM, LLC, GRAND ISLAND (DALE J. BAUMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. 

LAW OFFICES OF LAURIE G. OGDEN, BUFFALO (TARA E. WATERMAN OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick

H. NeMoyer, J.), entered December 16, 2011. The order granted the

motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# CA2004276DE.01000204.xml

| 11.11.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 276/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 276/2

---

Berichtigung der Stellenausschreibung für eine Leiterin/einen Leiter der Vertretung in Polen (GD PRESS) — COM/226/04

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 252 A vom 12. Oktober 2004)

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 252 A vom 12. Oktober 2004

(2004/C 276 A/08)

Seite 26: Erforderliches Profil, 6. Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„Kenntnis der politischen Situation und der Medien im Vereinigten Königreich;“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Kenntnis der politischen Situation und der nationalen Medien;“.

---
# C_2004168EN.01000702.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/7

---

Action brought on 8 April 2004 by Kelvin William Stephens against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-139/04)

(2004/C 168/13)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 8 April 2004 by Kelvin William Stephens, resident in Brussels, represented by N. Lhoëst, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 April 2003 inasmuch as it:






  — | did not classify the applicant in Grade A6, step 3, at the time of his recruitment; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 April 2003 inasmuch as it:

—

did not classify the applicant in Grade A6, step 3, at the time of his recruitment;

| — | did not reconstitute the career in terms of the applicant's grade by bringing forward the date of his promotions to Grades A5 and A4; |
| --- | --- |

—

did not reconstitute the career in terms of the applicant's grade by bringing forward the date of his promotions to Grades A5 and A4;

| — | limited the date of effect of the reclassification decision in regard to its pecuniary effects to 5 October 1995; |
| --- | --- |

—

limited the date of effect of the reclassification decision in regard to its pecuniary effects to 5 October 1995;

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 15 January 2004, served on the applicant on 30 January 2004, rejecting his complaint R/521/03; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 15 January 2004, served on the applicant on 30 January 2004, rejecting his complaint R/521/03;

| — | order the defendant to pay compensation provisionally set in the amount of EUR 125 000 in the event that, owing to impossibility, it is unable to reconstitute the applicant's career in terms of his grade; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay compensation provisionally set in the amount of EUR 125 000 in the event that, owing to impossibility, it is unable to reconstitute the applicant's career in terms of his grade;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In these proceedings, the applicant, who, on his recruitment in October 1985, was classified in Grade A7, step 3, challenges the decision of the appointing authority refusing to revise that classification, placing him in Grade A6, step 2, and not in Grade A6, step 3, refusing to reconstitute his career and limiting the date of effect of the decision on his reclassification to 5 October 1995.

The pleas relied on by the applicant in support of his claims are the same as those relied on by the applicant in Case T-125/04 Rousseaux v Commission.

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, February 12, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-3329.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, February 12, 
2015, at 12 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Theresa Singleton. For more information please 
contact: Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3329, TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509- National Office, 
Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other 
issues related to written communications from the IRS.

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-01466 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2023

# Recent FOIA Requests - January 2023

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during January 2023. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

[1] APP = Appeal

[2] FOIA case numbers, and the received date, are out of sequence due to test cases deleted in FOIAXpress this week. FOIAXpress re-uses case numbers that were previously deleted.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 15, 2023