alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Lined Waterway or Outlet (Ft.) (468) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Lined Waterway or Outlet (Ft.) (468) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Lined Waterway or Outlet (Ft.) (468).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

468 NHCP CPS Lined Waterway or Outlet 2023(141.42 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

468 NHCP NED Lined Waterway or Outlet 2022(86.57 KB)

468 NHCP PO Lined Waterway or Outlet 2022(401.23 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRIAN K. FERRY, SR., DOC #R24010, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D17-4097

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 13, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County, Chris Helinger, Judge.

Brian K. Ferry, Sr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# Waste Treatment (No.) (629) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Waste Treatment (No.) (629) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Waste Treatment (No.) (629).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Waste Treatment (No.) (629) (9/2020) Standard Document(77.25 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Waste Treatment (No.) (629) Overview(465.7 KB)

Waste Treatment (No.) (629) CPPE(25.39 KB)

Waste Treatment (No.) (629) Network Effects Diagram(67.13 KB)

##   Additional Information

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
*May 9, 1939.*

#### Meress, Administratrix, Appellant, vs. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: Max. *Raskin,*attorney, and *Wm. F. Quick*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents : *Bender, Trump & McIntyre*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Leigh Caswell*of Crystall Falls, Michigan, of counsel.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
# L_2023024DE.01004101.xml

| 26.1.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 24/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 24/41

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2015/1861 des Rates vom 18. Oktober 2015 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 267/2012 über restriktive Maßnahmen gegen Iran

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 274 vom 18. Oktober 2015
  )

Seite 4, Artikel 1 Nummer 4, neuer Artikel 3a Absatz 1 Buchstabe c:

Anstatt:

| „c) | für die Bereitstellung von Finanzmitteln oder Finanzhilfen im Zusammenhang mit den in Anhang I aufgeführten Gütern und Technologien, insbesondere die Bereitstellung von Zuschüssen, Darlehen und Ausfuhrkreditversicherungen, für den Verkauf, die Lieferung, die Weitergabe oder die Ausfuhr solcher Güter und Technologien oder für damit zusammenhängende technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste unmittelbar oder mittelbar für iranische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Iran;“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

für die Bereitstellung von Finanzmitteln oder Finanzhilfen im Zusammenhang mit den in Anhang I aufgeführten Gütern und Technologien, insbesondere die Bereitstellung von Zuschüssen, Darlehen und Ausfuhrkreditversicherungen, für den Verkauf, die Lieferung, die Weitergabe oder die Ausfuhr solcher Güter und Technologien oder für damit zusammenhängende technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste unmittelbar oder mittelbar für iranische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Iran;“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | für die Bereitstellung von Finanzmitteln oder Finanzhilfen im Zusammenhang mit den in Anhang II aufgeführten Gütern und Technologien, insbesondere die Bereitstellung von Zuschüssen, Darlehen und Ausfuhrkreditversicherungen, für den Verkauf, die Lieferung, die Weitergabe oder die Ausfuhr solcher Güter und Technologien oder für damit zusammenhängende technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste unmittelbar oder mittelbar für iranische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Iran;“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

für die Bereitstellung von Finanzmitteln oder Finanzhilfen im Zusammenhang mit den in Anhang II aufgeführten Gütern und Technologien, insbesondere die Bereitstellung von Zuschüssen, Darlehen und Ausfuhrkreditversicherungen, für den Verkauf, die Lieferung, die Weitergabe oder die Ausfuhr solcher Güter und Technologien oder für damit zusammenhängende technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste unmittelbar oder mittelbar für iranische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Iran;“.

---
# Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) (9/14) Standard Document(49.41 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) Overview(374.49 KB)

Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) CPPE(24.54 KB)

Surface Roughening (Ac.) (609) Network Effects Diagram(166.8 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Commercial Power Reactors and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update – Annual Report for Calendar Year 2015 (NUREG-1885, Revision 9)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 9 (PDF - 1.37 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2016**Date Published:** August 2016

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D.e of Chapter 14 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210d.e), as amended, which states, "[n]ot less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year." This is the eleventh annual report, which covers calendar year 2015. In addition to information on the security response evaluation program (force-on-force inspections), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing additional information regarding the overall security performance of the commercial nuclear power industry and Category I fuel cycle facilities to keep Congress and the public informed of the NRC's efforts to protect public health and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment through the effective regulation of the Nation's commercial nuclear power facilities and strategic special nuclear material.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2004118EN.01003701.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/37

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 April 2004

in Joined Cases T-124/02 and T-156/02: The Sunrider Corp. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Regulations (EC) Nos 40/94 and 2868/95 - Costs of the opposition proceedings - Partial withdrawal of the trade mark application - Withdrawal of opposition - Reimbursement of the appeal fees - Duty to state reasons)

(2004/C 118/78)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases T-124/02 and T-156/02: The Sunrider Corp., established in Torrance, California (United States of America), represented by A. Kockläuner, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn, established in Bremen (Germany) in Case T-124/02 and Friesland Brands SV, established in Leeuwarden (the Netherlands) in Case T-156/02 - actions, in Case T-124/02, against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2002 (Case R-386/2000-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn and The Sunrider Corp., and, in Case T-156/02, against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2002 (Case R-34/2000-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Friesland Brands BV and The Sunrider Corp. - the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; B. Pastor, Assistant Registrar, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 29.6.2002

1

---
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael W. Kinley, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  

4.

The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 21, 2006
# Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) Conservation Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) Conservation Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) (7/2022) Standard Document(236.55 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) Overview(562.31 KB)

Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) CPPE(24.63 KB)

Dike and Levee (Ft.) (356) Network Diagram(69.88 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
From: Jim Topsale/R3/USEPA/US
To: Ketan Patel/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 01/21/2011 01:44 PM Subject: Region 3 HMIWI Rule Issues

_______________________________________ Ketan, Good afternoon! I imagine some OAQPS folks may have a different opinion, considering the court’s decision not to grant EPA's request fo r a 15 month extension to promulgate the new/amended 112 boiler rules. Regarding Region 3, I would like you to know that Maryland now has a draf t HMIWI rule that I believe is very close to meeting the 10/6/09 ru le revision requirements. The draft has been a work in progress since early November of last year. During my review of Maryland's draft HMIWI ru le revisions, I noticed that there was no provision to define those authoriti es retained by the EPA Administ rator. After reviewing both subparts Ce and Ec, to my surprise, I found thatonly subpart Ec, sect ion 60.50c(i), contained a list of authorities retained by the EPA Administrator. For some reason, I thought that the draft subpart Ce and Ec revisions both identified the aut horities retained by the EP A Administrator. If there are plans for technical amendments to s ubpart Ce, perhaps that would be a “window of opportunity” to include a provision similar to th e 6/4/10 proposed CISWI emissions guideline, section 60.2542, regarding authorities that will not be delegated to states.
Jim T.
Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Colonial   Realty  Limited   Partnership  on  Form  S-3  related  to  the  Shelf
Registration  dated  December 11, 1997 (File No.  333-42049) of our report dated
January 13, 1999, except for Note 13, as to which the date is February 10, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements and financial statement
schedules of Colonial  Realty  Limited  Partnership  as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is
included in this Form 10-K.



                                     /S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP   
                                         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 30, 1999
October 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation Field Ditch (Code 388) 

A permanent irrigation ditch, constructed in or with earth

materials, to convey water from the source of supply to a

field or fields in an irrigation system. 

Practice Information 

This practice applies to open channels and elevated

ditches with a capacity of 25 cubic feet per second or less.

It does not apply to canals and laterals that deliver irrigation

water to a farm, nor does it apply to ditches constructed for

temporary use and removed during the growing season. 

Irrigation field ditches are permanent installations that require design and layout to achieve acceptable

stability, capacity, velocity, and water surface elevations to provide efficient application of irrigation

water to the field surface. The ditch banks may be closed and reopened to accommodate harvest,

tillage, and other cultural requirements of the crops produced. 

Field ditches are constructed in earth material that contains enough clay or other fine soil material to

prevent excessive seepage. The sealing effect of sediment carried in the irrigation water may be

considered in determining site suitability for a field ditch. 

An irrigation field ditch will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

Irrigation Field Ditch (388) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as Irrigation Water

Management (449), Irrigation Canal or Lateral (320), Irrigation Ditch Lining (428), Irrigation Pipeline

(430), Pumping Plant (533), Water Well (642), Structure for Water Control (587), Sprinkler System

(442) and Irrigation Systems Microirrigation (441), and Surface & Subsurface (443). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2172 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board 

of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open 

Market Committee to focus on maximum employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mrs. LOVE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate 

on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee to focus 

on maximum employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Focusing the Fed on 

5 the Currency of the United States Act of 2017’’ or the 

6 ‘‘FFOCUS Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2172 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF DUAL MANDATE. 

2 Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 

3 225a) is amended by striking ‘‘maximum employment, sta4 ble prices,’’ and inserting ‘‘stable prices’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-19121, 333-30797 and 333-57559) of our report dated February
7, 2000 (except for Note 1, paragraphs 2 through 5 of Note 2, and Note 14, as to
which the date is October 21, 2000) with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Phoenix International Ltd., Inc., as restated,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31,
1999.



                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
October 21, 2000
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Age-Specific Radiation Dose Commitment Factors for a one-year Chronic Year (NUREG-0172)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0172 (PDF - 27.05 MB)
        - Errata (PDF - 2.09 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** November 1977

Battelle Pacific Northwest Labortories Richland, WA 99352

**Prepared for:** Office of Standards Development Under Contract No. B21446

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

During the licensing process for nuclear facilities, radiation doses(a) and dose commitments must be calculated for people in the environs of a nuclear facility. These radiation doses are determined by examining characteristics of population groups, pathways to people, and radionuclides found in those pathways. The pertinent characteristics, which are important in the sense of contributing a significant portion of the total dose, must then be analyzed in depth. Dose factors are generally available for adults, see Reference l for example, however numerous improvements in data on decay schemes and half-lives have been made in recent years. In addition, it is advisable to define parameters for calculation of the radiation dose for ages other than adults since the population surrounding nuclear facilities will be composed of various age groups. Further, since infants, children and teens may have higher rates of intake per unit body mass, it is conceivable that the maximally exposed individual may not be an adult. Thus, it was necessary to develop new radiation dose commitment factors for various age groups. Dose commitment factors presented in this report have been calculated for a 50-year time period for four age groups. 

----

(a) In accordance with common practice, the term "dose", when applied to individuals, is used in this report instead of the more precise term "dose equivalent", as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements (ICRU).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021