alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. IA-14-025-EA; ASLBP No. 14-932-02-EA-BD01]

                    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in the above-captioned                     *James Chaisson*                     enforcement action proceeding is hereby reconstituted as follows: Administrative Judge Michael M. Gibson (who already is serving as a Licensing Board member in this case) is appointed to serve as Chairman; and Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III is appointed to serve in place of Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin.                

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR 2.302*et seq.*

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of January 2015.

E. Roy Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-01181 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Butterfly Technology, Inc. March 31, 1996 unaudited financial statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,094
<SECURITIES>                                    16,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,219
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004262EN.01002202.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/22

---

Action brought on 26 August 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-370/04)

(2004/C 262/38)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 August 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Braun and W. Wils of the Commission's Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (1) in national law, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (1) in national law, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of Directive 2001/16/EC expired on 20 April 2003.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 110, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2005002EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,09 % on 1 January 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

4 January 2005

(2005/C 2/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3365 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4351 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0385 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5477 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,39 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2460 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5801 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,366 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4338 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0859 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 942 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,78 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,570 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8070 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7300 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6254 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4042 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8855 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1961 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7314 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3365

JPY

Japanese yen

138,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4351

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0385

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5477

ISK

Iceland króna

83,39

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2460

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5801

CZK

Czech koruna

30,366

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4338

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0859

ROL

Romanian leu

38 942

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,78

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,570

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8070

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7300

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6254

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4042

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8855

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1961

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,96

ZAR

South African rand

7,7314

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Seifert, Respondent, vs. Mueller, Appellant.

*March 20*

April *9, 1914.*

*Statute of frauds: Oral contract to convey land: Real-estate brokers: Services under void contract:*Quantum meruit.

An oral contract to pay for the servicés of a broker by the conveyance of real estate to him is void under the statute of frauds (sec. 2304, Stats.), and for services rendered under such contract he may recover *quantum meruit.*

*630Appeal from a juc[gment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Laweeuce W. IIalset, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Gilbertson, Lehr, 'Reliman & Kiefer,*attorneys, and *Lehr, Kiefer & Reliman*and *J. Elmer Lehr,*of counsel.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Max J. Leuter-mann*and *F. P. Hopkins,*and oral argument by *Mr. Hopkins.*

Bashes, J.

This action was brought to recover a commission on the exchange of real estate. The plaintiff claimed to have been employed to make the sale or exchange by one Richter, the agent of the defendant. The plaintiff recovered ••and defendant appeals. The defendant urges in this court (1) that Richter had no authority to employ plaintiff in her behalf, and (2) that plaintiff agreed to accept and receive as his compensation a lot in the city of Racine. Richter and ■one Coogan testified that such was the agreement and that a deed was duly tendered in pursuance thereof. Plaintiff denied making such an agreement. The trial court did not pass upon this conflict in testimony, but held that the contract, if made, was void under the statute of frauds (sec. 2304, Stats.), and allowed a recovery on *quantum meruit*for the value of "the services performed.

1. The pleadings settle the first question raised. The complaint alleged that the defendant, by her agent Richter, “placed with plaintiff . . . for plaintiff to sell or exchange for her for other property, a farm” in Waukesha county, etc. 'This averment was admitted in the answer. It was shown without dispute that plaintiff did procure an exchange of defendant's farm for other property.

2. Under the decision in *Koch v. Williams,*82 Wis. 186, 52 N. W. 257, the parol agreement to pay for the service rendered by conveying real estate was void and plaintiff was entitled to recover the reasonable value of his service.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004309EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 December 2004

(2004/C 309/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3317 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4330 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9573 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5368 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,11 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5788 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,608 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6883 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4318 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1786 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 315 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,76 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,785 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 893 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7494 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6372 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3538 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8668 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1896 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 409,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6426 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3317

JPY

Japanese yen

139,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4330

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69150

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9573

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5368

ISK

Iceland króna

84,11

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5788

CZK

Czech koruna

30,608

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6883

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4318

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1786

ROL

Romanian leu

39 315

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,76

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,785

TRL

Turkish lira

1 893 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7494

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6372

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3538

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8668

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1896

KRW

South Korean won

1 409,20

ZAR

South African rand

7,6426

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004300EN.01000902.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-298/02: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Production aid for products processed from fruit and vegetables - Regulation (EEC) No 1558/91 - Article 1 - Peaches and pears - Decision 2002/524/EC)

(2004/C 300/18)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-298/02: Italian Republic (Agents: I.M. Braguglia and M. Fiorilli) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Cattabriga and M. Moretto) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 21 August 2002 — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič and E. Levits Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261 of 26.10.2002.

1

---
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 46208/46209

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DUSTIN CRAIG SWAYZE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: March 6, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Richard Greenwood, District Judge. 

Orders denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions for reduction of 

sentences, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated cases, Dustin Craig Swayze pled guilty to attempted trafficking in 

methamphetamine or amphetamine by manufacturing, Idaho Code § 37-2732B(a)(3), and 

unlawful possession of a firearm, I.C. § 18-3316 (Docket No. 46208). The district court imposed 

a unified sentence of ten years with two years determinate for the attempted trafficking charge 

and a consecutive two-year determinate term for the unlawful possession of a firearm charge. In 

Docket No. 46209, Swayze pled guilty to grand theft by unauthorized control, I.C. §§ 18-

2403(3), 18-2407(1), 18-2409. The district court imposed a unified sentence of twelve years 

with four years determinate and ordered the sentence to run concurrently with the sentences in 
2

Docket No. 46208. Swayze filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions for reduction of his sentences 

in each case, which the district court denied. Swayze appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Swayze’s Rule 35 motions, we conclude 

no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s orders denying Swayze’s 

Rule 35 motions are affirmed.
1 

Using Google Earth ProTM to create multiple AOIs for Web Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey has the capability of importing an ESRI TM shapefile for creating multiple Areas of 

Interest. This capability allows the customer to view the soils information for several locations in one 

customized report. Many of the Web Soil Survey (WSS) customers lack sophisticated GIS software to 

create the shapefiles necessary to take advantage of this multiple AOIs capability. There is a large 

segment of customers who turn to Google Earth Pro (GEP) as their default GIS. Using GEP, and an online 

converter tool, the non-GIS user can create a shapefile for import into WSS.

The first step in using GEP is to create the multiple places. These polygons should be placed into one

folder (in this scenario ‘Temporary Places’ is used and test1, test2, and test3 are the polygons):
2

The second step is to save the entire ‘Place’ folder as one file. Right click on the folder for the menu to 

appear. Then choose ‘Save Places As ...’

In this scenario, the file will be defaulted to the folder name of ‘Temporary Places” and saved as a kmz 

file:
3 

To this point, Google Earth ProTM is used to create the polygons with each polygon created under one 

GEP folder and the GEP folder is saved as a kmz file.

The KMZ file now must be converted to a shape file. Of all the systems tested, the ‘MyGeodata Cloud’ 

online application is the only one found to be capable of quality conversion maintaining the integrity of 

multiple disconnected polygons. The site is found at:

https://mygeodata.cloud/
4

Using the Converter application the file is uploaded to the application:

Click on ‘Add Files’ to browse to the file:

Add Files:
5

Specify the output – the ESRITM shapefile is the default:
6

The Conversion Result appears and details the output:

Download the data to your computer:
7

Open the Web Soil Survey application and choose to ‘Import AOI’:
8

Find the zipped file, ‘MyRanches.zip’ in this scenario:

Choose the ‘Set AOI’ button and the areas appear in Web Soil Survey as multiple AOIs:
9

And the customer can create thematic maps and reports of the multiple AOIs:

And, download the shape files and attribute data for use in their GIS, if they ever obtain one. 
10
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00780-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Marcus Anthony Johnson, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-18-216459

THE HONORABLE ELISABETH ASHLEA EARLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s pretrial order 

suppressing evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(a)(5). The State has now filed a 

motion to dismiss this appeal indicating that the parties have entered into a negotiated plea 

agreement, which includes the State’s agreement to dismiss the instant appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a).
2

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 8, 2020

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          $   196
<SECURITIES>                      8,294
<RECEIVABLES>                    43,226
<ALLOWANCES>                     (1,273)
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                               40
<DEPRECIATION>                      (37)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   50,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               235
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       50,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     50,860
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,208
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   2,071
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               2,071
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,071
<EPS-BASIC>                      0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.M.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                           EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION
                              STRATEGIC STOCK PLAN

         Pursuant to Section 14.1 of the El Paso Energy Corporation Strategic
Stock Plan, Amended and Restated effective as of December 3, 1999 (the "Plan"),
the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective February 7, 2001:

         WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation of El Paso Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was amended to change the name of the
corporation to El Paso Corporation effective February 7, 2001.

         NOW THEREFORE, the name of the Plan is hereby changed to the "El Paso
Corporation Strategic Stock Plan" and all references in the Plan to "El Paso
Energy Corporation" or the "Company" shall mean "El Paso Corporation."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 7th day of February 2001.


                                       EL PASO CORPORATION

                                       By:      /s/ Joel Richards III
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Human Resources and Administration


Attest:

    /s/ David L. Siddall
--------------------------------
    Corporate Secretary
Exhibit
        23.1
  Consent
        of Grant Thornton
        LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We
        have
        issued our report dated February 16, 2007 (November 8, 2007 for note
        15) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
        paragraph regarding the restatement of the Company's financial statements
        discussed in Note 15), accompanying the consolidated financial statements
        included in the Annual Report of Zones, Inc. on FORM 10-K/A for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
        by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Zones, Inc.
        on
        Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-87255, 333-110750, and 333-114945).
 
 
 Grant
        Thornton LLP
 Seattle,
        Washington
 December
        20, 2007