alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 2023

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Waste Storage Facility (Code 313) 

An agricultural waste storage impoundment or containment

structure. 

Practice Information 

The waste storage facility provides temporary storage of

manure, agricultural by-products, wastewater, and/or

contaminated runoff. The storage facility provides flexibility

for the operation for efficiient nutrient utilization. Storage

structure types include liquid waste storage ponds or tanks,

and solid waste stacking structures. 

Facility planning should incorporate environmental concerns, economics, the overall waste

management system plan, and safety and health factors. 

The design of waste storage structures depends on the intended storage period; the site location;

Federal, Tribal, State, and local laws and regulations; waste type and production rate; equipment

limitations; and safety concerns. 

An operation and maintenance plan is developed to specify requirements for emptying the storage

facility. The plan specifies timing, rates, and volume of waste applications. For ponds, the plan also

includes requirements for timely removal of waste material to accommodate subsequent storms. 

Common Associated Practices 

Waste Storage Facility (Code 313) is commonly applied with conservation practices such as Waste

Transfer (Code 634), Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Soil (Code 520), Pond Sealing or Lining,

Geomembrane or Geosynthetic Clay Liner (Code 521) or Pond Sealing or Lining, Concrete (Code

522), Composting Facility Code 317), and Nutrient Management (Code 590). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
# CREP Cal.V3.1

# CREP Practices

# Projected Costs and Income

# SWCDs
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has dulycaused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized and theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that (1) this Report complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.        Date: March 14, 2007 /s/ RALPH BARTEL   Ralph Bartel   *Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer*        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date:        |  |                            
|May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|             |  |                            
|             |  | Marc N. Teal               
|             |  | Principal Financial Officer
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 1999

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
#### Samuel S. Downey *v.*David J. Young.

From Granville.

After the Defendant has pleaded to a warrant, so as to meet the case made by it, the Plaintiffcannot, upon an appeal, declare in such a manner as to render the plea ineffectual.

TIpon a *quantum meruit,*where the Defendant pleaded a tender and paid money into Court, it seems that lie is not estopped to show a special contract.

The Plaintiff warranted the Defendant “for the nonpayment of the sum of sixty dollars due by account,” and recovered judgment for fourteen dollars, from which the Defendant appealed. The memorandum of the pleas in the County Court was, “general issue, tender often dollars and fifty cents, money paid into,-. Court.” In the County Court, the Defendant obtained a verdict, and the Plaintiff appealed. In the Superior Court a declaration was filed on a *quantum*meruit, whereby the Plaintiff sought to recover for hauling 14 sacks of salt. On the. trial, the Defendant offered to prove that the salt was hauled upon a special contract, for a less sum than the *433.Plaintiff claimed under bis *quantum*meruit. But his nor Judge. Strange, thinking that the Defendant, by paying money into Court, had admitted the cause of action as set forth in tiie declaration, and had reduced the contest simply to tiie amount, which the Plaintiff could, claim under the contract declared on, rejected the testimony. A verdict being returned for the Plaintiff, the Defendant appealed.

*,Yas/i*& Devereux, for tiie Appellant.

*Badger*for. the Plaintiff.

Hare, Judge.

By the act of 1794, *(Jlev.*ch. 414,) it is directed that ail sums, *and how*due, shall be-expressed in tiie warrants which shall issue for them. The warrant, which issued in the present case, would sustain a count for money due the Plaintiff, in the manner in which the Defendant admits he is his debtor. According to tiiis understanding of the warrant, the Defendant, in the County Court, pleaded a tender with a *proferí,*it follows that he has a right to give any tiling in evidence, which is consistent with this state of the pleadings, and that he is not deprived of this right by any gratuitous act of tiie Plaintiff. If by filing a declaration in the Superior Court consisting of this solitary count, the Plaintiff can deprive the Defendant of a defence, which he had already properly made, it should he considered as a mil lity. On tiiis ground alone, I think that tiie rule for a now trial should be made absolute. But if the question was upon the *quantum meruit*alone, 1 think the evidence should have been received, because the effect of a special, contract if proved, would be either to defeat tiie Plaintiff upon that count, or to fix the value of tiie work and labor, claimed under it. In both of which cases, tiie Plaintiff would bo entitled to the money brought' into Court, although he might be subjected to the payment of the costs. But on this part of the case I give no opinion.

Per Curiam. — Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 11.1
                              THE NORTH FACE, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                For the Years Ended December 31, 
                                                -------------------------------
                                                  1997       1996       1995
                                                ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding during
   the period:

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding............   11,297      4,739      3,238

Incremental shares from assumed
exercise of stock options (2)..................      281        436        553

Shares issued upon conversion of Series A
Preferred Stock................................      --       4,008      3,643
                                                ---------  ---------  ---------
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding..................   11,578      9,183      7,434
                                                =========  =========  =========

Income Before Extraordinary Loss...............  $11,107     $5,664     $3,485

Extraordinary Loss.............................      --        (863)       --
                                                ---------  ---------  ---------
Net Income.....................................  $11,107     $4,801     $3,485
                                                =========  =========  =========
Diluted Earnings per Share: (1)
      Income Before Extraordinary Loss ........    $0.96      $0.62      $0.47

      Extraordinary Loss, net of tax...........     0.00     ($0.10)      0.00
                                                ---------  ---------  ---------
      Net Income...............................    $0.96      $0.52      $0.47
                                                =========  =========  =========

(1)  Pro forma for 1995 and 1996 due to the assumed conversion, as of
     the beginning of the period, of all outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
     into Common Stock in conjunction with the Company's initial public offering
     in July 1996.

(2)  In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
     common stock and common stock equivalents issued within one year prior to 
     the initial public offering effective July 8, 1996, have been considered 
     as outstanding for all periods using the treasury stock method (assuming a
     market price of $14.00 in prior years), even though they are anti-dilutive
     in loss periods.

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Childtime Learning Centers,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 11, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Periodic Report"), I, Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   January 6, 2003                   /s/ Frank Jerneycic
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Frank M. Jerneycic,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Daniel J. Malcolm, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Daniel J. Malcolm                
|-------------------------------------
|Daniel J. Malcolm                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|November 14, 2003
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2010 | By:    | /s/ John P. Murray                                                                   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  | John P. Murray                                                                       |
|                 | Title: | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Road , Animal Trails and Walkways, Clearing & Snagging, Constructed Wetland, Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Dike, Diversion, Dry Hydrant, Fence, Fish Passage, Fish Raceway or Tank, Grade Stabilization Structure, Grassed Waterway, Irrigation Canal or Lateral, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation System-Microirrigation, Livestock Pipeline, Open Channel, Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant, Recreation Land Grading and Shaping, Rock Barrier, Sediment Basin, Stream Crossing, Stream Habitat Improvement and Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Structure for Water Control, Trails and Walkways, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Wetland Creation, Wetland Enhancement, Wetland Restoration, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Ronald
Jankov, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment no.1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Intentionally omitted]

4. [Intentionally omitted]

5. [Intentionally omitted]

Date:
February 16, 2012



/S/ RONALD JANKOVRonald Jankov President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) (7/2021) Standard Document(91.22 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) Overview(378.04 KB)

Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) CPPE(25.39 KB)

Precision Land Forming and Smoothing (Ac.) (462) Network Diagram(73.64 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Precision Land Forming

This video explores how Robert and Cathy Seidenstricker of DeValls Bluff, AR, used this practice on their cropland to improve their irrigation efficiency and water use.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2015

Surface Drain, Main or Lateral (608)

1. Excavated surface channel and stable 

water outlet

D.5 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance

Initial setting: Excessive 

surface or ground water limiting 

crop or forage production that 

is not in a designated wetland, 

with surface drainage, field 

ditch, or subsurface drain 

supplying water.

C.3 (+/-) Income and income stability 

(individuals and community)

I.6 (+/-) Aquatic habitats

I.5 (+/-) Sediment and particulate 

contaminants (including pathogens) to 

surface waters

I.7 (+) Dissolved 

contaminants (including 

nutrients) to surface waters

I.4 (+) Soil erosion 

D.3 (-) Subsurface 

water level

D.2 (+) Surface water runoff

I.3 (+) Offsite surface water

Streambank and Shoreline 

Protection (580)

Start

Integrated Pest Management (595)

Nutrient Management (590)

D.4 (-) Ponding 

of water

I.9 (+) Crop and

forage production

I.8 (+) Growing 

environment for desired 

plants

I.11 (+) Net returns to producer

Subsurface Drain (606)

Surface Drain, Field Ditch (607)

Critical Area Planting (342)

D.1 (+) Barriers/ 

wildlife habitat 

fragmentation

I.1 (-) Wildlife 

movement 

(species 

dependent)

I.2 (-) Wildlife 

range and 

distribution 

(species 

dependent)

I.10 (+) Potential 

income

C.1 (+/-) Quality of 

receiving waters

C.2 (+/-) Fishable and swimmable waters, health and safety issues for humans, domestic and wild animals

Filter Strip (393)

D.6 (+) 

Disturbed 

areas, 

exposed soil 

Critical Area Planting (342)

(-)

(+)

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Spoil Spreading (572)