# ATTACHMENT 

# EI 

## I

I 

## I

I 

## I

I 

## I

I 

## I

I 

## I

1l 1l 

## I II II I I II II I;··''' ·.·1

# ·,~~· 

# ORIGINAL

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

Indiana**Gov~rnment** Center South Conference Center, Room B 402 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

October 3, 2007 1:00 p.m.



## RECEIVED STATE OF fNDfANA 

### NOV 

### 2 ZOO?

DEPARTMENTOf**EIIVIR!lllf~ENTA1**MANAGEMENT OFFICEOFAIRQUALITY

WM. F. DANIELS d/b/a ACCURATE REPORTING OF INDIANA 12922 Brighton Avenue Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 848-0088A T T E N .D E E S

BOARD MEMBERS: Dr. James**Miner~** Chairman Mr. Kurt Anderson Mr. Thomas Anderson Mr. David Benshoof Mr. Howard Cundiff Ms. Pamela Fisher Mr. Chris Horn Mr. Jeffrey Quyle Mr. Brandon Seitz Mr. Randy Staley Dr. Phil Stevens Mr. Adam Warnke

ALSO PRESENT: Ms. Patricia Troth Mr. Daniel Murray

SPEAKERS: Mt. David Maidenberg Dr. Paul Winchester Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Dr. Mr. Ms. Tim Maloney Chad Whiteman David Long Janet McCabe Indra Frank Dan Weiss Gail Charnley ·Mr. Mark Strimbu Edward Cichanowicz John Ross

(Mr.

Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Ryan Camp Stan Pinegar Eugene Trisko Lisa Smith 2 

# •

•

•5 

### October 3, 2007 1:00 p.m.

CHAIRMAN MINER: The October 3,**2~07,** 

### meeting of the Air Pollution Control Board will now come to order. A**quoru~** 

### of the board is present. I will introduce the members and theii representations. We have Mr. Kurt Anderson, representing manufacturing; Mr. Tom Anderson, representing environmental; Mr.**D~vid** 

### Benshoof, representing small. business; Mr. Brandon Seitz, our new proxy for the lieutenant governor; Mr. Howard Cundiff for the Department of Health; Pamela Fisher, Indiana Economic Development Commission; Mr. Chris Horn, representing labor; Mr. Randy Staley, representing agriculture; Mr. Phil Stevens, representing the general public; Mr. Jeff Quyle, representing local government; and Mr. Adam Warnke filling in for John Bacone, Department of Natural Resources, as proxy. I am Dr. James Miher, representing medical. The first report will be the assistant commissioner's report. ·MR. MURRAY: 

### Thank you very much, Chairman Miner. CHAIEMAN MINER: I want to welcome you heie, 

### as

### 27 1 Mr. Warnke? 

# --") I \
• __ ,,1 

### 2 MR. WARNKE: Yes. 3 CHAIRMAN MINER:**Mi~** 

### Warnke votes yes. And I 4 vote yes, as well. The decision of the board is 5 unanimous for adoption of 326 IAC 1-1-3. 6 The fourth subject before the board is a public

(- 

### 7 hearing regarding preliminary adoption of amendments 8 to 326 IAC 6-6-5, the Burns_ Harbor Limited Liability 9 Corporation fugitive particulate matter emission 10 control plan, and 326 IAC 7-4-14i Porter County 11 sulfur dioxide emission limitations, Mittal Steel. 12 We will now introduce Exhibit No. 4, the draft rule, 13 into the record of this hearing. Is there someone 

# •

14 from the department who**~ishes** 

### to speak? 15 MS. TROTH: Sean Gorman will speak on this rule. 16 CHAIRMAN MINER: Good afternoon, Sean. 17 MR. GORMAN: Good afternoon, Chairman Miner, 18 members of the board. My name is Sean Gorman. I'm 

### a: 19 rule wr.iter in IDEM's Office of Air Quality. This 20 rulemaking proposes amending two existing rules 21 concerning operations at the ISG Burns Harbor 22 steelmaking plant in Porter Courity. 23 First, 326 _IAC 6-6-5 outlines the fugitive dust 24 control activities required at the**I~G** 

### Btirns Harbor 

# • '25 plant·. This rule has been**~ffective** 

### since 1984 and

### 28 1 

### specifies the locations and frequency of dust

# ·~ ./ 

### 2 

### suppressant application and requires the use of a 3 

### flusher truck followed by a tractor-mounted broom on 4 

### paved and unpaved roads at the facility. The rule 5 

### includes a map showing the lengths and configurations 6 of the paved and unpaved roads, also. 

### 7 Since 1984, the configuration of those roads has 8 changed, different technologies. and techniques for 9 dust suppression have become available, and ISG Burns 10 Harbor has requested the ability to tailor a fugitive 11 particulate matter control plan that would reflect 12 these changes and enable future modifications to that 13 plan as necessary without requiring future rule 14 changes. 15 The proposed amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 16 replaces the**proscrib~d** 

### fugitive particulate matter 17 contra+ plan with a requirement to submit to IDEM for 18**ap~roval** 

### a detailed fugitive particulate matter 19 control plan identifying and addressing all potential 

### 20 sources of fugitive particulates. ISG Burns Harbor 21 will gain the flexibility to tailor their plan as 

### 22 needed to reflect changes in operations, road 23 configurations, or newly available fugitive**dus~** 

### 24 control technology

. 

# • 25 Second, 326 IAC 7-4-14 establishes sulfur29 1 

### dioxide**~mission** 

### limits for emission points at ISG 

# •
2 

### Burns Harbor. This rule sets a limit of .07 pounds. 

### 3 of S02**pe~** 

### million BTUs for the**operation'~** 

### blast 4 

### furnace**ga~** 

### flare. Blast**furn~ce** 

### gas is a byproduct 5 

### of the steelmaking process**~nd** 

### is captured for reuse 6 

### as a fuel throughout the plant. The blast furnace 7 

### gas flare is a safetj device that relieves pressure 8 

### in the blast furnace gas supply line when there is 9 

### excess gas that cannot be used at other combustion 10 points at the plant. Combustion units using blast 11 

### furnace gai include blast furnace stoves, power 12 station boilers, arid·coke ovens.

. 

# ) 13 The pioposed amendments to 326 IAC 7-4-14 would 

# •

14 remove the blast furnace gas flare S02 limit for 15 several reasons. First., the air quality modeling 16 upon which that 7-4-14 S02**li~it** 

### is based assumes 100 17 percent of the available blast furnace gas as being 18 used at the other combustiori points. And so those 19 limits for those other combustion points were 20 actually set**assu~ing** 

### all available blast frirnace gas 21 is being combusted. 22 As long**~s** 

### the S02 emission limits for those 23 emission points, those other combustion devices

-- 

# ) 24 

### 25 the blast furnaces, the power station**~oilers,** 

### and the coke ovens are met, then any S02 for the blast

# •

### 30 1 

### furnace gas flare is redundant. And, furthermore, 

### 2 sulfur dioxide emission limits are not imposed on 3 flares for other steelmaking operations in Indiana. 4 Because its removal from 326 IAC 7-4-14 will 5 provide regulatory consistency for identical 6 operations in Indiana and will not result in any 7 

### increase of modeled S02 emissions, IDEM agrees with 

### 8 ISG Burns Harbor that this rule should be amended. 9 

### IDEM recommends that the board preliminarily adopt 10 

### these amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 and 326 IAC**7~4-14** 11 

### concerning the operations at ISG Burns Harbor. 12 CHAIRMAN MINER: Thank'you, Sean. Is there 13 anyone from the board who has questions for 14 Mr. Gorman at this time? Tom. 15 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: A couple questions. On 16 the fugitive dust plan that exists, if they are 17 what's going to happen in the interim time period? 18 Will this rule for the fugitive dust control still be 19 in place while the plan is being developed? 20 

### MR. GORMAN: Currently they are operating under 21 a variance in which ISG Burns. Harbor has submitted a 22 fugitive particulate matter control plan that IDEM 23 has approved as a condition to that variance. 24 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: So that's

-- is it the 25 final plari?

### 31 1 

### MR. GORMAN: That won't be the final plan. What

# • 2 the amendment**propose~** 

### is an outline of criteria by 

### 3 which they would structure a plati. And that criteria 4 is similar

-- or in most respects the same as the 5 

### requirements for fugitive**p~rticulate** 

### matter control 6 

### plans that's already**r~quired** 

### for other facilities in 7 

### 326 IAC 6-5. 8 

### MR. THOMAS**ANDERSON~** 

### You•ve been on-site to 

### 9 look at

-- 10 MR. GORMAN: Yes. 11 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON:

-- to

-- 12 MR. GORMAN:**Yes~** 

### And so the

-- and if you have 

### ) 13 seen the map on the

-- in the rule, it's barely 

# •

14 legible. I don't know if you've seen that. 15 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: Right. Yeah, I know. Arid 16 just in thinking about some of the specifics at the 17 plant

-- 18 MR. GORMAN: Right. 

### 19 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: I mean, I'm not sure of 20 the roadway or all the places where the particulate 21 matter is rusted and is causing problems during wind 22 events, among other things, along with the material 23 piles, too, but it would be**inter~sting** 

### to see that. 

### 24 Is that**~vailable** 

### then to review, for the board to 

# • .)
I 

### 25 review?

# • 1 2 

### MR. GORMAN: Yes'. Yes. MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: Okay. 32

That would be**~-** 

### 3 I'd like to see how we could request a copy of that. 4 Other questions I have are questions on the blast 5 

### furnace flare, I guess is what it is,**becau~e** 

### it 6 

### seems as though there should be other options besides 7 that flare. I mean, obviously, it's pretty visible 8 all the time and it's-- what other options are 9**a~ailable** 

### besides flaring off? And I understand that 10 if you have excess capacity, it has to go somewhere, 11 but aren't there alternatives besides just flaring 12 off a 

### 30- or**40~foot** 

### high flare continuously? 

### 13 14 MR. GORMAN: I'm not sure what**th~** 

### other**alternati~es** 

### would be. ISG Burns Harbor hasn't 15 proposed any alternative ways of dealing with**~-** 

### 16 17 18 

### 19 20 

### 21 22 23 24 25 MR. THOMAS ANbERSON: What would you**sugg~st** 

### as

an alternative way? MR. GORMAN: I don't have any suggestions. I'm just going by what they have proposed and what the limits are already set in the rule. And like I said, identical operations in Indiana are·not subject to S02 limits for their blast furnace gas flare, nor any flares required to meet S02 limits in Indiana. MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: Thank you. MR. KURT ANDERSON: Two questions. The first

### 33 1 

### one is just kind of cl';lrifying. Underneath the 

# •

2 

### fugitive dust control plan, we're basically taking it 3 from a rulemaking process and putting it into a 4 

### permitting process. Is that true? 5 

### MR. GORMAN: It would be a staff review process. 6 So instead of having this proscribed plan as it 7 

### exists already in the**rul~,** 

### they**h~ve** 

### a seties of. 8 

### criteria by which they structure the plan that is 9 

### then submitted to IDEM for review and approval. 10 MR. KURT ANDERSON: And that will be part of the 11 

### permit then or -- I can't understaQd why it would not 12 be. 

## ) 13 MR. GORMAN: It would already be a part of their • 14 Title 5. 15 MR. KURT ANDERSON: And that type o£ process I 16 truly believe belongs there, so -- the other point is 17 on the blast furnace. You said there was an old 18 regulation governing that. I guess my question is 1 19 believe there is. There's a requirement for 

### a**~lare** 

### 20 as a type of control technology. Right? 21 MR. GORMAN: Well, right. I'm just saying there 22 

### are no"limits imposed on**ot~er** 

### flares ih Indiana. 23 I'm sorry. Let me clarify. 24 MR. KURT ANDERSON: But there is a 

# • 25 technology-based requirement that they :are meeting34 1 

### with that flare? 2 MR. GORMAN: That's my understanding, that that 3 flare is necessary for the safe.**op~ration** 

### of their 4 blast furnace gas recovery system. 5 

### MR. KURT ANDERSON: Thank you. 6 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Any additional comments or 7 questions for Sean? 8 

### .MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: A quick question on the 9 relationship**~-** 

### because I saw in the rule on the 10 regional haze that this was one of the sources 11 

### mentioned in the fact sheet. Could you explain 12 what

-- I mean, maybe just because of the size of the 

### 13 emissions here or what impact this fugitive dust plan 14 may**h~Ve** 

### on the rule

-- on the regional haze rule? 15 

### MS. TROTH: Ken Ritter might be the more I 

### 16 appropriate person. to respond to that question, Tom. 17 MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: Okay. 

### 18 MS. TROTH: Ken, can you**~-** 

### 19 

### AUDIENCE MEMBER: He stepped out. 20 

### MR. THOMAS**AND~RSON:** 

### Because I did see that 21 mentioned as just one of maybe five or six sources 22 from Indiana that**~ould** 

### be addressed by the. regional 23 haze rule. 

### 24 MR. KURT ANDERSON: And fugitive dust will not

. . 

### be an issue, but regional haze, that would be more of

# ·~ 25

### 35 1 a sulfur dioxide/nitrogen dioxide issue. 

# •

2 

### MR. MURRAY: The particulate matter that would 3 be part of the fugitive control plan would not 4 typically be of that size that would .transport to the 5 northeast states that are concerned about regional 6 

### haze. It's more a component of sulfur dibxide and 7 oxide and nitrogen emissions. 8 

### MR. THOMAS ANDERSON: Like the sulfur dioxide 9 from a flare, for example? 10 

### MR. MURRAY: Correct. 11 CHAIRMAN MINER: Any**additi~nal** 

### comments or 12 questions for Sean? Thank you very much. 13 

### MR. GORMAN: Thank you. 

# •

14 CHAIRMAN MINER: I again**d~n't** 

### have any speakirig 15 cards from the general public regarding this rule. 16 Is there anyone in the public that wishes to comment 17 at this time? Seeing none, this hearing is now 18 concluded. The board will take action on preliminary 19 adoption of amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 and 326 IAC 20 7-4-14. Are theie any questions at present from the 21 board for the administration or technical staff 22 regarding this rule? Seeing none, I would**~ntertain** 

### 23 a motiort for preliminary adoption of**ame~dments** 

### to 

### 24 Rule IAC 6-6-5 and 326 IAC 7-4-14. 

# • ) 25 MR. HORN:. So moved.36 1 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: A motion from MY. Chris Horn. 2 

### MR. WARNKE: Second. 3 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: And a second from Mr. Warnke. 4 All those in favor signify by saying aye. 5 

### BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.
6 

### CHAIRMAN MINER: Opposed? Preliminary adopti6n 7 

### is passed. 8 

### It would probably be advantageous before we get 9 

### into the bulk of the meeting to take a few-minute 10·**bre~k** 

### before we start on the lengthy portion of the 11 agenda today. So we're taking a ten-minute break 12 until 2:00. 

# • 13 (AT THIS TIME THERE WAS A RECESS, AFTER WHICH 14 THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HELD:) 15**CHAI~MAN** 

### MINER: Come to order again for the 

### 16 second half af this meeting. I 

### This is now a public 17 hearing before the Air Pollution Control Board of the 18 State of Indiana regarding final adoption of 326 IAC 19 24, the Clean Air Mercury Rule. I'll now introduce 20 Exhibit 5-A, the proposed rule as preliminarily 21 adopted with IDEM's suggested changes incorporated, 22 and Exhibit**s~s,** 

### the propbsed rule as preliminarily 23 adopted, into the-record of the hearing. Pat, is 24**th~re** 

### someone who wishes to speak from the

-- 

### 25 MS. TROTH: Susan Bern is going to present this

### 210 STATE OF INDIANA ) 

# '··)**~-''** . 

### ·

. ., .

J 

## )ss: COUNTY OF BOONE ) I, Tavi L.**Fra~a,** 

### RPR, a Notary Public in and for the State of Indiana, do hereby certify that the foregoing proceedings were taken dowfi in stenographi notes and afterwards reduced to typewriting under my direction, and that the typewritten transcript is a true record of the proceedings to the best of my ability;

I do further certify that I am a disinterested person in this matter, that I am not a relative or attorney of any of the parties, or otherwise 

# •
interes-ted in the event of this matter, and am not in the employ of any of the parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have**her~unto** 

### set my hand and affixed my notarial seal this 30th day of October, 2007.



### My Commission Expires: February 8, 2010 TAVI L.**FRA~A** 

### Printed Signature 

# •TITLE 326 AIRPOLLUTIONCONTROLBOARD DRAFT RULE LSA Document #07-88 DIGEST 

# EXHIBIT4

Dnn (#07-88) ISG Burns Harbor LLC October 3, 2007

Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Bums Harbor LLC. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher. IDSTORY First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221- IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808- IR-326070088SNA). Notice ofFirst Hearing: August 8, 2007, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20070808- IR326070088PHA).

-- Date ofFirst Hearing: October 3, 2007 326 lAC 326 lAC**6~6-5** 326 lAC 326 lAC**7-4~14** DRAFT RULE SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDEDTO READ AS FOLLOWS: 326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; 13-17-3-4; IC**13-17~3-U;IC** 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; 13-15; 13-17 Sec. 5. (a) fu ordct to in1plement its nonttaditional fngiti'\'e dnst eorrtiol program; Bethlehem shall pmehase·a high presstn:e watct fl:ttshing ttttck and a ttaetor sweepet with broom and install a water filling stationfotthe flnsher ttnek and atar:rkfm the storage and dispensing ofliqnidchctnieal dnstretardant. Thefoilowing control measmes shallthen be itnplemctrted attheDmns !!arbor Plant at the specified fieqnency. (l)Atotal oftwency•fum (24) miles**ofpa~ed** andmtpaved roads as shown in Fignre 1 shall be eonttoiled as described below. (A) Atotal of12.7miles ofpaved roads shall be eleattedtluee (3) times per weekby water washing ming a flnsher ttnck 

### except as indicatedin snbseetion (a)(4}ofthis seetion.ln addition, at least twice per 'IJveek, 7.9 miles ofthese roads in the primary facilities mea will also be wet swept nsing a ttactor mottnted broom following the flusher trnck. Road shonlders on the 12.7 miles ofpaved roads will be graded rts requited and tteated with a chemiCal dmttetardant atthe 

## same :6:eqnene, specified below fot. tmpayedroads. Aeenmnlated material 

### on toad shottldcts will be remO"Ved Page 1

### ofl3

# ')

)



# ) at least once per month. Drm (#07-88) ISG Bums Harbor LLC October 3, 2007

## )!l~**~ ~:1** **~~·==~ed** toeds sh_all be conttolled. This will consist ()f applieatiort ofatwo (2}to fotu

# 04**{i:~~it;re~d~**to**09**

# ~ lmge material, a:ttd the shall be sprayed with dttst sttppressa:ttt soltttion ne sag

## .~~te neeessary...smfaees the rnanttfaetttrer's reeormnendations Tl d at a:tt appheatton I

## ~e eonststent with I ate shall be snob that a erttst

## ~ill be

## f; te ;sts('pressanttnatettal a:ttd application cleaning via flttshing and

## s~eeping**;r~e** o;.t t1e road stufaecthat is amenable to

### ~ith a flnshet trttek:

### follo~ed b

### ~ 

# 4:1: sttr aees shall be cleaned twice per week resprayed vvith chemical dttst y a ae or mottnted btoom. Road sttrfaces shall be snrfaee. The soltrtion strength s:J't

### ess~ :s rteeessM?' to rnahrtain. a cleanable application based npon the condition

# ~ftl:~as:~~= wtll be determined prior to (2) Bethlehem shall control its

### lo~ \iolatilc coal stella

. . . . per . week

## ~itlt achetnieal dttst 1etmda:ttt.

## ~epries by sptaymg thcrn at least once (3) R:eeords ofallfugitil

### edttst eonttol aeti iti I H b . . shall contain the

## folio~ing informati v es naetnaurtarned. Ataminirnmn, reeords on. (A) nttntber of**mil~s** and location ofthe pir\ied I oads elemtod (D) rmmber of mtles of nnp d

. . d 1
. ' qttarrtiey, and diltttion ratio

## :f~~:t**r::;~ar::~~d ~ere**  treated inclttding the eype, (C)ltlte type,

## ~ttantity, and diltrtion ratio ofdttst ;etmda:ttt sprayed.onlo l fl eoa storage pries.

. vv '\iO a 1 e This information shall be sttmm · d . · qtta:tterly

. . attz:e tnto ptogress reports a:ttd sttbmitted to tlte board 

## E4) Tltis nontraditional fugiti'\ie d t 1
. . needed to take into aecottnt

### pree:~**eo~rtro** prograrn can be adjttsted .on a dai? basis as example, rainfall andtemperatttre)

## an~**~y ~ndb** **foree~d** meteorologteal conditions (for elearted.

. ' v tstta o 

### seiVattons of

### the I oad\lvay s

### sehedttledto be 

# (Fig::**~~thlehem** Steel Corporation noirtraditional fugiti'\ie dttst eorrtrolroads 

### is**sho~n** as**follo~s**

Page 2 of13 

# •

•

•

# • >t t Dmi (#07-88) ISG Bums HarborLLC October 3, 2007



## • 

## f**--foii=~Ui!Wl~·** 

## :

.

(a)EffectiveNovember 17,2007,ISGBurnsHarborLLCshallimplementanapproved fugitive particulate matter emission control plan meeting the requirements ofthis section. (b) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "Asneeded basis" meansthefrequency ofapplication necessaryto minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matter emissions" means particulate matter that is emitted from any source by means otherthan through a stack. (3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage ofmaterial consisting of, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture ofiron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, which is finer than two hundred (200) mesh size equalto orgreaterthan one percent (1%) by weight. Open aggregatematerial mesh size shall be determined by the "American Association ofStateHighway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74", or other equivalent procedures approved by the commissioner. (4) "Pavedroad" means anyasphaltorconcretesurfacedthoroughfareorrightof-way: (A) designed orused for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, orowned by, an individual orcompany. 

### Page 3 of 13

# )

·_) Drm (#07-88) ISG BumsHarbor LLC October 3, 2007 (5) "Potentialemissions" meansfugitive particulatematteremissionscalculated after the application ofair pollution control: (A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "Unpaved**ro~ds"** means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of':'way, other than a paved road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: · (A) designed orused for vehicular traffic; and (B)located on the property of, orowned by, an individual or company. (c)ISGBurrisHarborLLC'sfugitive particulatematteremission controlplan shall be inwriting and shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) Thename and address oftheowneroroperatorresponsible for theexecution ofthe control plan. (2) Identification ofall: (A) processes; (B) operations; and (C) areas; that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter. (3) A map ofthe source showing the following: (A) Aggregate pile areas. (B) Access areas around the aggregate piles. (C) Unpaved roads. (D) Paved roads. (E) Parking lots. (F) Location ofconveyors and transfer points. (G) Otherpotential sources offugitive particulate matter. (4) The number and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following: (A) Paved.roads. (B) Unpaved roads. (C) Parking lots. (5)The type and quantity ofmaterial**handled~** (6) The equipment used to maintain aggregate piles. (7)-A description of the measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from emission points identified insubdivision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust suppressant material, such as oil orchemical, including the estimated

.frequency of application,**r~tes,** and concentrations of the dust suppressant. (9) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment used**~s** a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (10) A schedule ofcompliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specify the amount oftime the source requires to: Page 4 ofl3 

# •

•

•

# •

• (A) award any necessary contracts; and Dnn (#07-88) ISG Bums HarborLLC October 3, 2007 (B) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe "fugitive particulate matter emission control measures. (11) Other relevant data that may be requested by the commissioner to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe control plan. (d) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (1) kept andmaintained; (2) retained for at least five (5) years; and (3) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner. (e) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered reasonably available control measures (RACM). The frequency ofapplication for all control measures shall be detailed in each control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violatetheprovisionsofstatestatutesorrules. Fugitiveparticulatematteremissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads, unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pitprocessing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and parking lots as follows: (A) Paved roads and paved parking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (i) Cleaning by vacuum sweeping. (ii) Flushing. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas and unpaved parking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: ·(i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dust suppressant or water based dust suppressant approved by thecommissioner. Thefrequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis, (iii) Sprayingwith water. Thefrequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal theroad surfaceand maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equivalent alternate measure. (2) Open aggregate piles by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles; Page 5 of13-

# J Dnn (#07-88) ISG Bums Harbor LLC October 3, 2007 (B) Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (3) Outdoorconveyingofaggregatematerial,such as, butnotlimited to,slagproduced during the manufacture ofiron and steel, sand, gravel; stone, andcoal,by equipment such as belt conveyors and bucket elevators, by the use of one (1) or more of the following measures: (A) Enclosing the conveyor belt totally on the top and· sides as needed to minimize visible emissions and, ifneeded, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during operation ofconveyor. (B) Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dustsuppressant at the feed point,.at intermediate points, or at both, as needed to minimize visible emissions. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (4) Transferringofaggregate material shallbe controlled bytheuse ofone(1) orniore ofthe following measures: (A) Minimizing the distance between the transfer points. (B) Enclosing the transfer points and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulatecontrol equipmentduringtheoperation ofthetransferring system. (C) Application ofwaterorsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressantas needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure. (5) Transporting aggregate material by truck, front-end loader, or similarvehicle by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) A completely,enclosed vehicle. (B) Tarping the vehicle. (C) Maintainingthevebicle body in such a condition thatprevents any leaks of aggregate material. (D) Spraying the materials in the vehicle with a suitable and effective dust suppressant. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (6) Loading and unloading operations ofthe material from storage facilities, such as bins, hoppers, and silos, onto or out ofvehicles by**th~** use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measureS: (A) Enclosure ofthe material loading and.unloading area. (B) Total or partial enclosure of the facility and exhausting of emissions to particulate collection equipment. Such equipment shall be approved by the commissioner. (C) Sprayingwith waterorsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressantas needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) Reducing the free fall distance. 

### Page 6.of 13 

# •

•

•(E) An equivalent alternate**measure~** Dnn (#07-8&) ISG Bums Harbor LLC October 3, 2007 (7) Hauling and dumping solid waste (as defined in IC 1J.:.ll-2-205(a)) as follows: (A)Haulingsolidwaste by theuse ofone (1) ormore ofthefollowing measures: (i) Wet suppression ofthe material being transported. (ii) Hauling the material enclosed or covered. (iii) Minimizing ·the free fall distance when unloading from the particulatecollectionequipmentorfrom theprocessequipmentontothe hauling vehicle, or from both. (iv) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Dumping solid waste by the use of one (1) or more of the following measures: (i) Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant on an as needed basis to minimize visible emissions. (ii) Minimizing the free fall distance ofthe material. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (8) Material handling operations, such as crushing, grinding, screening, and mixing, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Wet suppression. (B) Enclosure ofemission source with venting ofemissions to a fabric filter. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (9) Building openings, such as doors, windows, powered or unpowered ventilators, or roofmonitors, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Installing a removable filter over appropriate building openings. (B) Capturingemissions within thebuilding by the use ofa properhood system and conveying through a ductto particulatecollection system approved by the commissioner. (C) An in-house operating and procedure maintenance program consisting of the·following: (i) Proper maintemince of the process equipment and particulate collection system approved the commissioner. (ii) Substitution of the process equipment, material, or operating procedure thatwill minimize visible emissions. (D)An equivalent alternate measure. (f) Within three (3) months ofreceiving a control plan, the commissioner shall notify ISG Burns Harbor LLC of: (1) the approval ofthe control plan; (2) modificationsthatthecommissionerdeems necessarytothecontrol plan; or (3) disapproval ofthe control plan. (g) lfthecommissioner finds a controlplan to be incomplete,ISGBurnsHarborLLC Page 7 of13

# ) shall provide the commissioner with the required additional information. Dnn (#07-88) ISG Burns HarborLLC October 3, 2007

(h) In determiningifan alternate control measure represents a RACM.as specified in this section, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The impact on the environment in terms of any increase in water, air, or solid waste pollutionemissions. (2) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (3) The: (A) capital expenditure; (B) impact on production; and (C) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure; (4) The impact ofthese costs. (5) Any adverse worker or product safety implications ofthe selected control measure. (i).Ifa control planis disapproved bytlie commissio._er, ISGBurnsHarborLLC shall have up to fifteen (15) days from the date ofreceipt ofthe disapproval letter to**~equest,** in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: (1) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements set forth in IC4-21.5; and (2) the burden ofproofshall lie with ISG BurnsHarborLLC to demonstratewhy the control plan is appropriate. G) The control plan approved by the commissioner shall become part ofISG Burns HarborLLC's operating permit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 lAC 6-6-5;filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20 p.m.: 11 IR 2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001,3:20p.m.: 24 IR 1477) SECTION 2. 326 lAC 7-4-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 3261AC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; 13-17-3-4; 13-17-3-11; 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 13-15; 13-17 Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds permillion Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Bethlehem Steel ISGBums Harbor Works LLC shall comply with the following: (A) The following facilities shall bum natural gas only: Page 8 ofl3 

# •

•

# •**~•** (i) BOF Shop FMBoiler. Drm (#07-88) ISG Burns HarborLLC October 3, 2007 (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply withthe sulfurdioxide emission limitations and other requirements: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs.IMMBtu lbs./hr. (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves 0.83 545 (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves 0.83 545 (iii) Blast

### Ftttmtcc Flare 6:69 (h7 (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 1 1.0 pound per ton400 

### M (iv) No. 1Coke Battery Underfire ('ri)" (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire (vii) (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: process material 1.73 1.96 803 911 (AA) No Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four hundred eightytwo (482) pounds perhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32)horizontally discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace andfor natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bumblast furnace andfor natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. ('riii1. (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 299 Reheat Furnace No. 1and BoilerNo. 1 fix)' (viii) 160 inch Plate. Mill Continuous 1.96 299 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo.·3 

### W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.96 79 each No. l, 2, and 3 tri)'(x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.96 441 1 and2 

### tm] (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 88 Furnace tmi} (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill 

### I & 

### 0 1.96 274 Furnaces No. 4 and5 Page 9 of13

# J

)

_ _./ {xiv1 (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.96 Furnaces No.6 an,d 7 (x-vt (xiv) 160 inchPlate Mill

### I & 

### 0 Furnace 1.96 No.8 txvi} (xv) Power Station Boiler No. 7 0.8 

## fx'ri17 (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 10, 11, and 12 Dnn (#07-88) ISG Bums HarborLLC October 3, 2007

274 176 520 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem Steel ISG BurnsHarbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations andotherrequirements 

### as follows: Emission LimitAtions Facility Description lbs.IMMBtu lbs.lhr. (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves 0.75 498 (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves 0.75 498 (iii) Blast Fmnaee Flme &.67 twf(iii)

.Sinter Plant Windbox 1.0 pound per ton400 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfrre tvi} (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire tvttr(vi) Slab Mill SoakingPits: process material 1.57 1.78 730 828 (AA) NoNot more than six (6)ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be frred on coke oven gas atthe same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed tWo huridred ninetytwo (292) pounds perhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32}horizontally discharged soaking pits mayburn blast furnace andTor natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically·discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace andTor natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four ( 4) pounds per hour. 

### fviii7 (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 tix}-(viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 {x]-(ix) 80 inch Hot Strip ·Mill Furnace 1.78 483 each No.1, 2, and 3**~(x)** 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.78 401 1 and 2**~(xi)** 110 inch Plate MillNormalizing 1.07 88 Furnace Page 10 of13 

# •

•

•

# •

-· Dnn (#07-88) ISG Bums HarborLLC October 3, 2007**~xii)** 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78 249 Furnaces No.4 and 

### 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No. 6 andfor 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No.4 and 5 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78. 249 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 If 160 inchPlate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No.4 andfor 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only. (n-1 (xiv) 160 inchPlateMill I & 0 Furnace 1.78 160 No.8 txvi](xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520**~(xvi)** Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 total 2,500 total 10, 11, and 12 (x\fiii) Bethlehem Steel (xvii) ISG Burns HarborLLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours priorto reliance onthe alternative set oflimits specified in items (i) through 

### '(x'rii}·Dethlehetn Steel (xvi). ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) Forthe purposes of326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and for the setofrequirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to 110 not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (D)(iv),**(D)('~ii)(AA)** thtongh (D)(lii)(DD), (D)(liii) 

### th1ongh (D)(xi) (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (D)(xiii) 

### tlnongh (D)(xvii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceedfour thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfrre Stacks shall be restricted to no not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilitieslisted in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv),**(C)('~ii)(AA)** 

### tlnongh**(C)('~ii)(DD)** (C)(viii) 

### thtonglt (C)(x:i) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii) 

### thtongh (C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand sixhundred thirty ( 4,630}pounds per hour. (E) Bethlehem Steel ISG Burns HarborLLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified 

### in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Page 11 of13

## ) Dnn (#07-88)

. ISG B1,1111s HarborLLC October3, 2007 Bethlehem SteelISG Burns HarborLLC shall submita report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end ofeach calendar quarter containing the following information: (i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) thtottgh and (C). (ii) Records ofthe: (AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and ofthe- (BB) maximum number ofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. · (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate inthe applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, andfor pounds per ton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)('vii)(AA) thtottgh (C)('vii)(DD), (C)(viii) thtottgh (C)(xi) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii) tluough (C)(nii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day inpounds per hour duringthe calendar quarter. (F) Dethlehetrt SteeliSG Burns HarborLLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall: (i) contain a description ofplanned procedures for: (AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; ;-for- (BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; andfor · (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere The ptotoeolshai:l; and (ii) specifythe frequency ofsampling, analysis, andfor-measurement for each: (AA) fuel and material; and fot each (BB) facility. The department shall incorporatethe protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, andfor measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stacktest at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days of written notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall complywith the following: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs.IMMBtu (A) Boilers 7 and 8 6.0 each Boilers 7 and 8 shallbe fired with coal; fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 natural gas only Page 12 of13 

# •

•

•

# • (3) Midwest Steel 

### shall comply with the following: Drm (#07-88) ISG Bums HarborLLC October 3, 2007

Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1and ErieCityBoilersNo. 1, 1.33 each 2, and 3 Only two (2) offour (4) boilers may bum fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds permillion Btu at the same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. ( 4) Air Products and Chemical 

### shall comply with the following: Facilitv Description Emission.Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (Air Pollution ControlBoard; 326lAC 7-4-14;jiledAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 14IR 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477; errata filedDec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 26IR 1568)

Page 13 of13

# •

•

•

# ATTACHMENT 

# F

### 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1

I 

### 1 

### 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

### 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

### 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,,**,~.** / 

### 1 2 3 4 5 

### 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 

# • ;;..,**'~** 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

# ':~· BEFORE THE STATE OF INDIANA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

### RECBVED 

## APR 

## 0 92009 IDEM-OLC PUBLIC MEETING OF APRIL 1, 2009 

# ORIGINAL

PROCEEDINGS before the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board, Thomas Anderson, Chairman, taken before me, Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., a Notary Public in and for the State of Indiana, County of Shelby, at the Indiana Government Center South, Conference Center, Room A, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday, April 1, 2009 at 1:02 o'clock p.m.

William F. Daniels, RPR/CP CM d/b/a ACCURATE REPORTING OF INDIANA 12922 Brighton Avenue Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 848-0088 1**~-**

# ' j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 )' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

### APPEARANCES: BOARD MEMBERS: Thomas Anderson, Chairman Jeffrey Quyle Greg Kissel Randy Staley Dr. Phil Stevens Chris Horn Howard W. Cundiff, Proxy, State Board of Health Pamela Fisher, Proxy, Indiana Economic Development Corporation Brandon Seitz, Proxy, Lieutenant Governor

IDEM STAFF MEMBERS: Thomas W. Easterly, Commissioner Pat Troth Nancy King Ann Long Amy Smith Betsy Rouse Janet Pittman

PUBLIC SPEAKERS: Janet McCabe 2 

# •

•

•

# •
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

# • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

# • CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: 1:02 o'clock p.m. April 1, 2009

The April 1st, 2009 meeting of the Air Pollution Control Board will come to order. A quorum of the Board is present. I'd like to introduce members and their representations, as we go to Howard Cundiff, proxy for the Department Of Health; Pamela Fisher, proxy for the Indiana Economic Development Corporation; Chris Horn, representing labor; Greg Kissel, representing manufacturing; Brandon Seitz, proxy for the Lieutenant Governor; Randy Staley, representing agriculture; Dr. Phil Stevens, representing the general public; and I

am acting Chairman Tom Anderson, representing environmental. First we have the Commissioner's report,

so I guess we have the presentation of the commissioner/ Tom Easterly. COMM. EASTERLY: Thank you, Tom. I don't have a lot to say, but I wanted to tell you what's happened since the last meeting 3

### ') 1 

### 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Moving to the second public hearing, this is a public hearing before the Air Pollution Control Board of the State of Indiana regarding adoption of amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 and 326 IAC 7-4-14 on behalf of Mittal Steel, LSA No. 07-88. I will now introduce Exhibit 2-A, the proposed rule as preliminarily adopted with IDEM's suggested changes incorporated, and Exhibit 2-B, which is the proposed rule as preliminarily adopted, into the record of the hearing. Is there anyone from the Department who would like to comment on the rule? MS. TROTH: Ann Long. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Ann Long. MS. LONG: Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and members of the Board. My name is Ann Long, and I'm with the Office of Legal Counsel at IDEM. 32

The Department is here today to propose that the Board recommend redrafted amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 concerning the Fugitive Particulate 

# •

•

•

# • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

# • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

# • Matter Control Plan for ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC. 33

The need for redrafting the amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 after the amended rule was preliminarily adopted by the Board in October 2007 is explained in a memo from me and in the fact sheet in your Board packet today. The one-sentence version of my memo could read, "This rulemaking needs a slight midcourse correction," and I guess that's why they have me, the attorney, talking today. Since preliminary adoption of the amended rule, there have been discussions between IDEM and ArcelorMittal and also discussions between IDEM and the Attorney General's Office about the Fugitive Matter

-- or I'm sorry-- the Fugitive Particulate Matter Control Plan portion of the rulemaking, and that's 6-6-5. And basically, ArcelorMittal and IDEM have agreed, after several discussions, that the preliminarily adopted rule needed to be amended to better respond to ArcelorMittal's comments during the rulemaking and their subsequent

## ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 

### 7 8 9 10 11

I 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 clarification of those comments in relation to their**~urrent** 

### operations. The rule language is also proposed to be amended to be clearer, to be completely internally consistent, to provide additional flexibility for the control plan that would be approved by IDEM, and to be consistent with 34

326 IAC 6-5 and the rest of the same chapter that this rule is in; that is, 326 IAC 6-6. The proposed amendments that are before you today are not a logical outgrowth of the preliminarily adopted rule, but they are a better rule. The logical outgrowth issue, my office, the Office of Legal Counsel, and the Attorney General's office, concur that the amendments before you all today are not a logical outgrowth. Therefore, we are suggesting, we are asking this Board to proceed with this entire rulemaking; that is

-- and there's two parts to this operations of ArcelorMittal Steel rule

-- the amendments to 6-6-5 that have to do with the Fugitive Particulate Matter Control Plan, and then the amendments to 7-4-14, that is the 80 2 

# •

•

•

# • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

# • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

# • 35

flare limit, under the provisions of Indiana Code 13-14-9-9 Sub (3), which I will now explain. Under this procedure, the Board would recommend the amendments that are contained in IDEM's suggested change document to the preliminarily adopted 07-88. That action would invoke another statute, 13-14-9-11, under which the preliminarily adopted rule plus the proposed amendments to the fugitive dust control language, would be republished in the Indiana Register, and that's to provide additional notice so that we're overcoming the problem of logical outgrowth and

we can get additional comments on the amendments that have been revised. After publication, the Board could then consider final adoption of the rules. Are there any questions? CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Any questions for Ann? MS. LONG: Yes. DR. STEVENS: So, we're not doing a final adoption today; is that correct? MS. LONG: No, and I think that

--36**~)** 

# • 1 

### DR. STEVENS: Because it says final 2 

### adoption on 3 

### MS. LONG:

-- was kind of a sneaky 4 

### thing, yeah. 5 

### DR. STEVENS: Okay. 6 

### MS. LONG: On the agenda, you see 7 

### final adoption, but we were in here to say we're 8 

### walking toward final adoption, but we suggest a 9 

### republication of this amended language to provide 10 

### adequate notice before final adoption. 11 

### MR. CUNDIFF: In effect, this is 12 

### another preliminary adoption? 

# •
13 

### MS. TROTH: Huh-uh. 14 

### COMM. EASTERLY: Essentially, but 15 

### not

-- well 16 

### MS. LONG: It is essentially another 17 

### preliminary adoption, but the Attorney General's 18 

### Office wouldn't say so, actually. 19 

### MR. CUNDIFF: I understand. 20 

### MS. LONG: So, in trying to work with 21 

### how we do a correction

-- and, you know, I went 22 

### over and talked to them and said, "Look, 23 

### there's

-- we need to do publication again of

\ ) 

# •

# •

•

• 1 this new language, you know, to see if we get 2 additional comment, to make sure it's all 3 copacetic with everybody," and this little 4 statutory procedure is what we came up with, 5 and

-- but it is, it really is repreliminary 6 adoption. 7 

### MR. QUYLE: And do you think any 8 potential new comments would come from the 9 

### steelmaker or from the public. Do you think the 10 steelmaker wants further time to digest what the 11 new language encompasses? 12 13 14 

### MS. LONG: I really believe that is between the steelmaker and us. The issues are fairly resolved. We've had several very long 37



### 15 phone calls, very long e-mails back and forth and 16 drafts have been exchanged, and I think that they 17 understand our position and we understand their 18 current operations a little bit better to be able 19 to fit this rulemaking more into what they 20 actually do, okay, and what actually needs to be 21 done there at the steel company. 22 Whether other people in the public 23 comment, I mean that's what we have the other38 

### ')

I 

# • 1 

### the additional comment period for, and I would 2 

### have no way of anticipating what kind of 3 

### additional comments would come in. I'm just 4 

### saying that the public and ArcelorMittal, if they 5 

### want, can certainly continue to comment on the 6 

### rule language. 7 

### MR. CUNDIFF: But since this is not a 8 

### logical outgrowth, then the rule could be 9 

### challenged in court and they might win, so we 10 

### would need to do this, then. 11 

### MR. QUYLE: Uh-huh. 12 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Are there other 

# •
13 

### questions for Ann? 14 

### (No response.) 15 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: I guess I have a 16 

### question on what the anticipated reductions would 17 

### be from this rule, if you would have those 18 

### quantified. 19 

### MS. LONG: I have a technical person 20 

### on board here. 21 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Okay. 22 

### MR. QUYLE: Thank you. 23 

### MS. LONG: Amy, do we have 

# •

# •

•

• 39



### 1 information on that, or is that something that we 2 could present at the final rule hearing? 3 MS. SMITH: We could look into 4 that

-- CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Okay. 5 6 

### MS. SMITH:

-- and present it at the 7 final hearing. 8 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: All right. Thank 9 you for that consideration. 10 

### MS. LONG: I mean sure, we would, in 11 what we anticipate doing, have another actual 12 

### final hearing on this where additional questions 13 would be asked. 14 15 16 17 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: 18 for your presentation. MS. LONG: Sure. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Great. Thanks.

If not, thank you

I do have one 19 20 21 

### card. Janet McCabe, Executive Director of 22 Improving Kids' Environment, wishes to speak on 23 this rule

.

## ) 40



### 1 MS. MCCABE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 2 I'm still Janet McCabe, and I actually do have 3 some questions about this, so I appreciate the 4 process that the agency is using to allow for 5 additional comment. 6 It's from the fact sheet, it's really 7 pretty hard to tell what these additional changes 8 are, and to the extent that the agency 9 acknowledges they're not a logical outgrowth, 10 that suggests to you that

-- suggests to me, 11 anyway -- that they're significant. 12 

### What the fact sheet says is that the 13 changes allow greater flexibility, and I'll tell 14 you that that's a phrase that makes my antenna go 15 up, when I see greater flexibility without more 16 

### explanation. So, I did a comparison of the 17 rules, and I think what I have are questions for 18 the agency, but I'll state them in the form of 19 comments and then engage, however, with the 20 agency to try to answer them. 21 

### It appears that the changes

-- well, first 22 of all, let me say that I

-- I agree with the 23 

### overall approach that it's better to have a 

# •

•

•

# •
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

# • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

# • system where a company submits a plan for approval to control fugitive dust rather than spelling every little detail out in the rule, which is how they were originally written, so I agree with that approach. 41



### But there are some changes that are suggested today, proposed today, that I have some questions about. So, here are some examples: The new proposed rule changes the definition of open aggregate pile. In the original rule, it included a variety of different types of materials, slag and other sorts of materials, and in the rule before you today, it's limited just to coal. So, I'm wondering about that, why other materials are no longer to be included in the fugitive dust control plan. It also seems to limit the types of locations of the plant that will be covered by the fugitive dust control plan to the piles, the coal piles, paved and unpaved roads. The previous rule included areas around piles, parking lots, areas where material is transferred

or conveyed from one place to another, which

### 1 2 

### certainly would be an area where fugitive dust could be generated. So, I'm curious about why 3 those areas are no longer to be covered by the 4 Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 5 It appears to

-- the steel mills often 6 have contractors that work on their property, 7 that conduct various operations on their 8 property, but are companies that are separate 9 

### from the steel mill itself. Those contractor 10 areas appear no longer to be required to be 11 covered in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 12 

### There may well be answers to these 42



### 13 questions, but I wanted to raise them today. So, 14 I appreciate the opportunity to speak today, and 15 I'll look forward to hearing from the agency and 16 talking with the agency about why some of these 17 changes are going to be made and what the impact 18 will be on the creation or reduction of fugitive 19 dust on this property. 20 21 22 23 

### you. Thanks. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: All right. Thank

Are there any questions for Janet? 

# •

•

•

# •

•

• 1 2 3 4 5 6 

### (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Thank you. That's all of the cards I have. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on the rule. (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, the 7 hearing is now concluded. Are there any 8 questions about the rule from the Board or any 9 questions for anyone? 10 (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, I would 11 12 

### entertain a motion to preliminary

-- would it be 13 preliminary adoption? 14 

### COMM. EASTERLY: Is it preliminary 15 adoption or CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: I'm-- yes. 43

16 17 

### MS. LONG: I believe we have proposed 18 language in the script that talks about 19 republishing the rule with the suggested changes 20 for additional comments. 21 22 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Exhibit 4. COMM. EASTERLY: We've both got to 23 look because we've never done this before

.1 2 3 4 

### Okay. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Yeah. Do we have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Okay. A motion 5 should be made to forward the proposed rule with 6 IDEM's suggested changes incorporated to the 44



### 7 Indiana Register for an additional public comment 8 period prior to the Board voting on IDEM's 9 suggested changes and final adopting the rule. COMM. EASTERLY: Yeah, that's right. MR. CUNDIFF: So moved. 10 11 12 

### CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: I would entertain 13 that motion. 14 (Laughter.) 15 16 

### COMM. EASTERLY: Do you remember it? CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: 17 moves. 18 Is there a second? 19 20 21 22 23 

### seconds. MR. STALEY: Second. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: All in favor, say aye. MR. HORN: Aye. MR. KISSEL: Aye. Howard Cundiff

Randy Staley 

# •

•

•

# • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

# • 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

# • 45

MR. QUYLE: Aye. MR. SEITZ: Aye. MS. FISHER: Aye. MR. CUNDIFF: Aye. DR. STEVENS: Aye. MR. STALEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Aye. All opposed, nay. (No response. ) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: The motion carries and the rule is preliminarily adopted and sent forward with the language as mentioned. Moving on to other matters, is there anyone else who wishes to address the Board today? (No response.) CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, I'll move to the announcement for the next Air Pollution Control Board meeting is tentatively set for June 3rd, 2009, 1:00 p.m., Indiana Government Center South, Conference Room A, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. contact the Office of Legal Counsel at Please

### 49 

## ) 

# • 1 CERTIFICATE 2 I, Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., the undersigned 3 Court Reporter and Notary Public residing in the 4 City of Shelbyville, Shelby County, Indiana, do 5 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and 6 

### correct transcript of the proceedings taken by me 7 on Wednesday, April 1, 2009 in this matter and 8 transcribed by me. 9 10 11 12 Notary Public in and 

# • 13 for the State of Indiana. 14 15 My Commission expires October 27, 2016. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
I i 

# •

# •

• EXHIBIT 

# 2-A.

Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009

Bold and single underline =new language being added since preliminary adoption Bold, sbikeont and single nndetline new language at preliminary adoption that is being deleted (the board will not be requested to final adopt this language) TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PROPOSED RULE AS PRELIMINARILYADOPTED WITH IDEM'S SUGGESTED CHANGES INCORPORATED LSA Document#07-88 DIGEST Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-'14 concerning operations at ArcelorMittal Bums HarborLLC. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher. HISTORY First Notice: February 21,2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221- IR-326070088FNA)

. Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808- IR-326070088SNA). Notice ofFirst Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808- IR326070088PHA). Date ofFirst Hearing: October 3, 2007. Proposed Rule: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA) Notice ofSecond Hearing: October 31,2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR326070088PHA) Change ofNotice ofPublic Hearing: January 16,2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20080116-IR-326070088CHA)

· Change ofNotice ofPublic Hearing: December 3, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20081203-IR-326070088CHA) Change ofNotice ofPublic Hearing: February 25,2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090225-IR-326070088CHA) Date ofSecond Hearing: April 1, 2009 326 lAC 6-6-5 326 lAC 7-4-14 SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG BUins Hatbot LLC ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control planRap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Burns Harbor LLC April 1, 2009 Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15; IC 13-17 Sec. 5. (a) Inorder to iirtplen1ent its nontraditional fugitive dustcontrolprogram,Bethlehem shall purchase a high pressure water flushing tmck and a tractor sweeper with broon1 and install a water filling station for the flusher truckand a tank for the storage and dispensing ofliquidcherl1ical dustretardant.Thefoliowing contiolmeasures shall thenbeiinplementedattheDmnsHarbor Plant at the specified frequency. (1) A total oftwenty-four {24) miles ofpavedandunpavedroads as shown in Figure 1shall be controlled as described below. (A) A total of 12.7 miles ofpavedroads shallbe cleanedthree (3) times per weekby water washing using a flusher truck ex:cept as indicated in subsection (a)(4) ofthis section. In addition, at least twice per week, 7.9 miles ofthese roads in the primary facilities area will also be wet swept using a tractor mounted broom following the flusher truck. R:oad shoulders on the 12.7 miles ofpaved roads will be graded as required and treated with a chemical dust retardar1t at the same frequency specified below for unpaved roads. Accumulatedmaterial on road shoulders will be removed at least once per month. (D) A total of 11.3 miles ofunpaved roads shall be controlled. This will consist of forming a uniform road surface h) road grading to remove large n1aterial, and the application ofatwo {2) to four (4) inch layer offine slag where necessary. Surfaces shallbe sprayed with dust suppressant solutionatar1 applicationrate consistent with the matmfacturer'sreconnnendations. The dust suppressantmaterial andapplication rate shall be such that a crust will be formed on the road smface that is amenable to cleaning via flushing and sweeping. R:oad surfaces shall be cleaned twice per week with a flusher truck followed by a tractor mounted broom. R:oad surfaces shall be resprayed with chemical dust suppressant as necessary to maintain a cleanable smface. The solution strength and application rate will be determined prior to application based upon the condition ofthe surfaces. {2) Bethlehem shall control its low volatile coal storage piles b:y spraying them atleast once per week with a chemical dust retardant. {3) R:ecords ofall fugiti v e dust eontrol aetiv ities shallbemaintained. Ata mininmm, records shall contain the following information. (A) number ofmiles and location ofthe paved roads cleaned, (D) number of miles of unpaved roads which were treated including the type, quantity, and dilution ratio ofdust retardant used, (C) the type, quantity, and dilution ratio ofdust retardant sprayed on low volatile coal storage piles. This information shall be smmnarized into progress reports and sttbmitted to the board quarterly

. 2 

# .)



# •

# •

•• Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009 (4) Titis nontraditional fugitive dust control progtam can be adjnsted on a daily basis as needed to take into account pteceding day and fotecasted tneteotological conditions (fo1 example, rainfall andtcmperatme), and visual obse1 \lations ofthetoadways scheduledtobe cleaned. (b) Bethlehem Steel CotpOiation nontraditional fugitive dust contml toads is shown as follows (Figure 1)

.

(a) Effecme No,embet 17,2667,ISGBtunsHatbot LLCArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLCshall implement an appto,ed submit a fugitive particulate matter emission control plan for the Burns Harbor Plant (Plant ID 127-00001) located at U.S. Highway 12 meeting the requirements ofthis section to the departmentwithinthree (3) months afterthe effective date ofthis rule,**notwithstandin~** 326lAC 6-6-3. Theplan shallbein accordancewith and subject to the following requirements: (1) 326 lAC 6-4-6. (2) Emission factors and control efficiencies in 326 lAC 6-5-l(d) subdivisions (1) through (3)

. 3Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Burns HarborLLC April 1, 2009 

### (3) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC may petition the commissioner to use emission factors and control efficiencies other than those referenced in subdivision (2) if adequate support documentation is submitted demonstratine that the submitted emission factors and control efficiencies provide equivalent protection for human health and the environment.
(b) 

### The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) 

### "As neededbasis"meansthefrequency ofapplicationnecessaryto minimizevisible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matter emissions" means particulate matter that is emitted from any source by means other than through a stack. (3) 

### "Open aggregate pile''means theunenclosed storage ofmatetiaJ consisting of• but not limited to, slag pioduced duting the manufactu1 e ofit on and steel. sand, gt alel, stone, and 

### coal, which is finer than two hundred (200) mesh size equal to or greater than one percent (1%) 

### by weight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined by the "American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74"*, or other equrulent 

### procedures equivalent in • reliability as approved by the commissioner. (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-

. way: (A) designed orused for vehiculartraffic; and (B) 

### located on the property of, or owned by, an indnidual 01 company 

### ArcelorMittal Burns HarborLLC. (5) "Potentialemissions" means fugitive particulate matteremissions calculated after the application ofair pollution control: (A) measures; or (B) 

### equipment. (6) 

### "RACM" means reasonably available control measure. 

### :ffilffi"Unpavedroads"means any surfacedthoroughfare orright-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: (A) designed or used for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an indhidual 01 compan-y 

### ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC. (cl ISOButns Hatbot LLC'sfugitnepatticulatematter enrission conttol plan shallbe in WIiting and shall include, at a minimum, the following in£01 mation. (1) Thename and addtess oftheown:et or operatot 1espousiblefor tbe execution ofthe conhol plan. (2) Identification ofall. 4 

# •

# •• .I



# • (A) p1 ocesses; (B) opetations; and (C) ateas; that ha,.e the potential to emit fugitin patticulate matte1 • (3) A tnap ofthe soutce**showin~** the followine. (A) Aeet**e~ate** pile ateas. (B) Access ateas atound the aggtegate piles. (C) Unpand 1 oads. (D) Pand 1oads. (E) Patkine lots. (F) Location ofconnyou and tiansfet points. Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April I, 2009

(G) Othet potential soutces offugime patticulate matte1 • (4) The nnmbet and cypes of vehicula1 actil'ity occutt**in~** on the following. (A) P:ned 1oads. (B) Unpand 1oads. (C) Patking lots. (5) The 

### b pe and quantity ofmatetial handled. (6) The equipment used to maintain aeetegate piles

. (7) A desc1 iption of the measutes to be implemented to conttol fugitil'e patticulate matte1 enlissions 1**esultin~** ft ont entission points identified in subdhision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust supptessant matetial, such as oil ot che1nical, including the estintated ft equency of application, 1ates, and concenbatious of tbe dust supp1 essant. (9) A specification of the patticulate mattet collection equipment used as a fugithe patticulate 1natte1 emission conbol nreasu1 e. (16) A schedule of co1npliance "With the ptOl'isions ofthe conttol plan. The schedule shaH specifl the amount oftinre the soutce 1eguhes to. (A) awa1 d any necessa1 y contt acts; and (B) commence and conrplete consbuetion, installation, 01 tnodification of the fueime patticulate mattet eniission conbol nreasntes. (11) Other 1 elel'ant data that ma, be 1equested by the commissionet to e" aluate the effectil'eness ofthe coubol plan. (d) Recot ds that document all contiol measutes and aethities to be implemented in accotdance with the apptond conbol plan shall be. (1) kept and maintained; (2) 1etained fot at least five (5) yea1 s; and (3) made aYailable upon the 1eguest ofthe commissionet. (c) The contents and record keeping requirements for the fugitive particulate matter 5

### emissions control plan are as follows: Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009



### ill The control plan shall be in writing and include, at a minimum the folloWing information: (A)The name and address of the owner or operator responsible for the implementation ofthe control plan. (B) 

### Identification ofall: (i) 

### Open aggregate pile areas; (ii) 

### Paved roads; and (iii) 

### Unpaved roads. that have the potential to emit fu2itive particulate matter emissions in accordance with subsection (d). (C) 

### A map of the ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC property showing the followin2: (i) 

### Open aggregate pile areas. (ii) 

### Access areas around the open aggre2ate piles. (iii) 

### Unpaved roads. (iv) Paved roads. (D) 

### The quantity and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following: (i) 

### Paved roads. (ii) 

### Unpaved roads. (E) 

### Quantity ofopen aggregate piles that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter emissions. (F) 

### The equipment used to maintain open a2gregate piles. (G)A description ofthe controlmeasures to beimplementedto controlfugitive particulatematteremissionsresultingfrompotential emissionpointsidentified in clause (B). (H) 

### A specification ofthe dust suppressant material that will be used, such as oil or chemical, including the estimated frequency and rates of application, rates, and·concentrations ofthe dust suppressant. 0) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment that will be used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (J) 

### A schedule of compliance with the provisions of the control plan. The schedule shall specify the amount oftime the source reguires to: (i) 

### award any necessary contracts; and (ii) 

### commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matter emission control measures. (K) Otherrelevant datathatmayberequestedbythe commissionerto evaluate the effectiveness ofthe control plan. (2) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: 6 

# .)

# •

• Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88

. ISG Bums Harbor LLC



### (A) kept and maintained atArcelorMittal Burns HarborLLC; (B)

### retained for atleast five (5) years; and (C) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner. April!, 2009



### frlUD. All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered reasonably available control measures (RACM). The frequency ofapplication for all control measures shall be detailed in eadr

### the control plan. No controlplan shall contain control measuresthat violate the applicable provisions of state statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matter emissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) 

### Paved roads and unpaved roads marshaling yards, slab haulroads, slab and coil stot age a1 eas, designated beach it

### on duntping at eas, blastfurnace slag pitprocessing acthities, it

### on and steel slag pot dUinping a1 eas, and parking lots as follows: (A) Paved roads and pand patking lots by the use ofone (1) 

### or more ofthe following measures: (i) Cleaning by vacuum sweeping. (ii) 

### Flushing. (iii) 

### An equhalent alternate measute RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to either (i) or (ii)• (B) 

### Unpaved roads, matshaling yatds, slab haulroads, slab and coil storage ateas, designatedbeachh on dUinping at eas,blastfurnace slag pitptocessing**acti'~ities,** 

### h on and steel slagpotdumping ateas andunpandpatking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dust suppressant or water based dust suppressant app1 o'edby the comntissioner •Thefrequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iii) 

### Sprayingwith water. Thefrequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equhalent alternate measu1 e RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to one (1) 

### or more ofthe above measures. (2) Open aggregate piles by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. (B) 

### Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An egunalent alternate measut eRACM thatis equivalent in effectiveness to one (1) 

### or more ofthe**abo~e** 

### measures. I 

### (3) Outdoor con'eying ofaggr egatentatetial, such as, butnotlimited to, slagptoduced 7Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009


### dntin£ the manufacture ofiron and steel, sand, £la'\lel, 

### stone, arrd coal , by eguipnrent such as belt conYe,

### on and bucket elelator s, b1 the use of one (1) 

### 01 mot e of the follo"Wing measutes. (A) 

### Enclosing the connyor belt totalh on the top and sides as needed to

. . . . "bl

. ' d "f d d h t•
. . . I



### . rmnrmrze 'lSI 

### eermss1ons an , 1 nee e , ex aus1ngennssrons to par hcu ate

corttrol equipment during opetation.ofcon'\1eyor • (B)

### A;pphing "Water or suitable andeffecthe chemical dustsupptessant atthe feed point01 atinter mediate points, or atboth, as needed to minintizelisible emissions. (C) An equhalent alternate nreasure. (4) 

### Ttansfetting ofaggregatematerial shallbe conboiledby theuse oforte (1)

### or mot e ofthe foHowing measutes. (A) 

### l\finhnizing the distance bet"Ween the b ansfer points. (B) 

### Enclosing the b ansfer points and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulate conbol equipment during the oper ation of the b ansferring sntem. (C)

### Application of"'ater ot suitable and effecthe chemical dust supptessant as needed to minimize 1isible emissions. ID) An equhalent alternate measute. (5) Tr anspor tine ag£I egate ntaterial by.buck; fr ont-end loader, or similar 1ehicle by 

### the use ofone (1) 

### or mote ofthe following measures. (A) 

### A completely enclosed nhicle. (B) 

### Tarping the nhicle. (C) Maintaining the 1ehidebody in such a condition thatpr e"ents any leaks ofa2eregate ntaterial. ID) Spta1ing the materials in the 1ehicle with a suitable and effecti1e dust supptessant. ffi) 

### An equhalent alternate measure. (6} 

### Loading and unloading opetations ofthe material f1 om storage facilities, such as bins, hopper s, and silos, onto or out ofnhides by tbe use of one (1) 01 

### mote of the following measntes. (A) 

### Errdosnt e ofthe materialloading artd unload;ing at ea. (B) 

### Total or partial enclosure of the facility and exhaustirtg of emissions to patticulate collection equipment. Such equipment shall be appr01ed by the corumissionet • (C) Sptaying with "Watet 01 suitable and effecti1e chemical dust suppt essant as needed to ntininrize "isible emissions. ID) Reducing tbe f1 ee fall distance. (E) An equilalent alternate measnte. (7) Hauling and dumping solid "Waste (as defined in IC 

### 13-11-2-20S(a)) as follo1ts. 8 

# •

- 

# )


# .\

!



# .!

# •

•

/ Rap with IDEM Changes#07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009 (A) 

### llauline solid waste b'y 

### the use ofone (1) 

### 01 moteoftbefollowing measures. (i) 

### Viet supptession ofthe tnatetial being b anspotted. (ii) llauline the mate1ial enclosed 01 colet ed. (iii) l\finimizing the ft ee fall distance lthen unloading f1 ont the patticulate collection equipment 01 f1 om the ptocess equipment onto the bauline nhide, 01 f1 om both. (h) An equi"alent altetnate measrn e. (B) 

### Duntpine solid waste by the use of o11e (1) 

### ot mote of the follotthte measutes. (i) 

### Applyine wate1 01 suitable and effectin chemical dust supp1 essaut on an as needed basis to 

### minimize Yisible emissions. (ii) 

### Minimizing the f1 ee fall distance ofthe matetial. (iii) An equhalent altetnate measute. (8) 

### Material handling opet ations, such as ctusbing, gtinding, sci eening, and ntixing, by the use ofone (1) 

### 01 ntot e ofthe following measutes. (A) 

### Viet supptession. (B) 

### Enclosute ofemission sou1 ce with 'enting ofe1nissious 

### to a fab1 ic 

### filte1 • (C) An equilalent alternate measute . (9) Building openings, such as doot s, windows, powet ed 01 unpowet ed 'entilato1s, 01 .I

### oofmonitot s, by the use ofone (H 

### or mote ofthe following measutes. (A) Installing a 1

### emo "able filtet ot 

### et app1 optiate building openings.• (B) 

### Captuting emissions within the buildine by the use ofaptopet hood system and eonnying tbtougb a duet to patticulate collectiott system app1 Oled by tbe eommissionet • (C) 

### An itt-bouse ope1 atine and ptocedute ntaintenance ptogt am consisting of the following. (i) Ptopet maintenance of the piocess equipment and patticulate collection sy

### stent app1 oved the conmtissionet

. fii) 

### Substitution of the p1 ocess equipment, n1ate1 ial, 01 opet ating p1 ocedure that will ntinimiz:e lisible emissions. (D) 

### An equivalent altet nate measme. 

### f:ft...UU The approval ofthe control plan shall be in accordance with the following: 

## illWithin three (3) months ofreceiving a control plan, the commissioner shall notify fS6 

### ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor

### LLC of: ffl(A) the approval ofthe control plan; ffl(B) modificationsthatthecommissionerdeems necessaryto thecontrolplan; or ffl(C) disapproval ofthe control plan. fg1@ If

### the commissioner finds a control plan to be incomplete, fS6 

### ArcelorMittal 9Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April 1, 2009



### Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissioner with the required additional information. 

### f!Uill In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, fS6 

### ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following: ffi{Al

### Theimpacton the environmentinterms ofanyincreasein water, air, or solid waste pollution emissions. 

### ffiOO The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. ffi{Q. 

### The: (1\)'(i) capital expenditure; (B}(ii)

### impact on production; and te)(iii) 

### operating costs; to implement the selected control measure. ffi@

### The impact ofthese costs. (5) An1 adntse wotket 01 

### product safety implications ofthe selected control measute. f:i1G} If

### a control plan is disapproved by the commissioner, fS6 

### ArcelorMittal Burns HarborLLC shallhaveuptofifteen (15) thirty (30)

### daysfromthedateofreceiptofthe disapproval letter to request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: ffi{Al 

### it shall be held in accordance with the requirements set forth in IC 4- 21.5; 

### and 

### ffiOO theburdenofproofshall lie withfS6

### ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC to demonstrate why the control planis appropriate.**~** 

### The control plan approved by the commissioner shall become part of ISG ArcelorMittal Burns HarborLLC's operating permit. (6) 

### Changes may be madeto the controlplan without reopening the operating permit by submitting a revised control plan to the commissioner for approval in accordance with this subsection. (0 

### The control plan shall be updated at the time of reapplication for the source's operating permit or as required in 326 

### lAC 2. 

### *These documents are incorporated by reference. The documents are available for review and copying atthe IndianaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagement, Office ofAir Quality, Indiana Government Center-North, Tenth Floor, 100 

### North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (AirPollution ControlBoard; 326/AC6-6-5;filedMar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 11 IR 2510; readopted 10 

# ., J



# .I

# • filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477) Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009

SECTION 2. 326 lAC 7-4-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 326 lAC7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; 13-17-3-4; 13-17-3-11; 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 13-15; 13-17 Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in PorterCounty shall complywith the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Bethlehem**Steel~** ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborWorks LLC shallcomplywiththe following: (A) The following facilities shall bum natural gas only: (i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. (ii) 160inchPlateMill ContinuousHardeningandAnnealingHeatTreatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v) Continuous HeatTreatLine- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, andReheat. (B) Thefollowing facilities shall complywiththe sulfurdioxide emissionlimitations and other requirements: Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Fnmaee Flate {ivJ (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1Coke Battery Underfire (vi] (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire frii1 (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. 0.83 545 0.83 545 &.-67 1.0 pound perton400 process material 1.73 1.96 803 911 (AA) NoNotmore than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32)horizontallydischarged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) pounds perhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) of thirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace andfor natural gas, or 11Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Burns HarborLLC April 1,2009 both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds perhour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast fumaceandfornaturalgas, orboth,withtotal sulfurdioxide emissionsnot to exceed four (4) pounds perhour. 

## tvmJ (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 Reheat Furnace No. 1 and BoilerNo. 1 

### 6xJ (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 (x7 (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.96 No. 1, 2, and 3 (xi} (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.96 1 and2 tm} (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 Furnace triii} (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.96 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 (x:iv1 (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.96 FurnacesNo. 6 and 7 (xv1 (xiv) 160 inchPlateMill I & 0 Furnace 1.96 No.8 {xvi}(xv) Power Station BoilerNo. 7 0.8**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 10, 11, and 12 299 299 79 each 441 88 274 274 176 520 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem SteeliSGArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and otherrequirements as follows: Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Fnxnace Flare (iv)-(iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire (vi} (v) No.2 Coke Battery Underfire trii)-(vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. 0.75 498 0.75 498 &.-67 1.0 pound per ton400 process material 1.57 1.78 730 828 (AA) NoNotmore than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) 12

# ·~

# •

•

•• pounds perhour. Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April 1, 2009

(BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) of thirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace andfor natural gas, or both,with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnaceandfornatural gas, orboth,withtotal sulfurdioxide emissionsnot to exceed four (4) pounds perhour. triii} (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 1 and BoilerNo. 1**~(viii)** 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 tx}-(ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.78 483 each No. 1, 2, and 3 (riT(x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.78 401 1 and2**~(xi)** 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 88 Furnace (riii]-(xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78 249 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No. 6 andfor 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only. 

## 6civJ (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78 249 Furnaces No.6 and 7 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No.4 andfor 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only.**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnace 1.78 160 No.8**~** (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520**~(xvi)** Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 total 2,500 total 10, 11, and 12 (xviii) Bethlehem Steel (xvii) fS6 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to reliance on the alternative setoflimits specifiedin items (i)through {xvii7Bethlehem Steel (xvi). fS6ArcelorMittal BurnsHarborLLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and shall make the records available to the department upon request. 

### fxix1 (xviii) For the purposes of 326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be 13Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April I, 2009

determinedbasedon separatecalendarmonthaverages forthe setof requirements specified in this clause and for the set ofrequirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to no not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feetper day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (D)(iv), (D)(vii)(AA) tluough (D)(vii)(DD), (D)(viii) through (D)(xi) (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (D)(xiii) through (D)(xvii} (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to no not more than seventy (70} million cubic feet perday, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed inclause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (CXvii)(AA) thtough (C)(vii)(DD) (€)(viii) through (C)(xi} (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii) tlnough (C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed fourthousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds perhour. (E) Dethlehetn Steel I:S6 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) priorto December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Bethlehent Stee11S6 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30)days following the end of each calendar quarter containing the following information: (i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blastfurnace gas, fuel oil, andnatural gasusage for each day at eachfacility listed in clauses (B)tluough and (C). (ii) Records ofthe: (AA) average sulfurcontent andheating value as determinedperthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and of-the- (BB) maximumnumber ofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds perhour, pounds per million Btu, andfor pounds perton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(AA) through (C)(vii)(DD), (€)(viii) through (C)(xi) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)( vii)through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii)tlnough (C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) Bethlehem Steeli:S6 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall: 14

# ·~

# •

••



# • Rap with IDEM Changes #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April I, 2009 (i) contain a description ofplanned procedures for: (AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; ;-for- (BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; and for (CC) any planned direct measurement of sulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere The protocol shall ; and (ii) specify the frequency of sampling, analysis, and/or-measurement for each: (AA) fuel and material; and fur each (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department mayrevise the protocol as necessaryto establishacceptable sampling, analysis, andformeasurementsproceduresandfrequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test atany facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification bythe department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations· Facility Description lbs./MMBtu (A) Boilers 7 and 8 6.0 each Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, ornatural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 natural gas only (3) Midwest Steel shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1and Erie CityBoilersNo. 1, 1.33 each 2, and 3 Onlytwo (2) offour (4) boilers maybumfuel oil with a sulfurdioxide emissionrate greater thanthree-tenths (0.3)poundspermillionBtuatthe sametime. MidwestSteel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) AirProducts and Chemical shall comply with the following: Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 326/AC 7-4-14;filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 14IR 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477; errata filedDec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 26IR 1568)

15

# •~

# • TITLE 326 AIRPOLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

# EXIDBIT2-B

Rap #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April I, 2009

PROPOSED RULE AS PRELIMINARILY ADOPTED LSA Document #07-88 DIGEST Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Bums Harbor LLC. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher

.

. HISTORY First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221- IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808- IR-326070088SNA). Notice ofFirst Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana RegisterJDIN: 20070808- IR326070088PHA). Date ofFirst Hearing: October 3, 2007. Proposed Rule: October 31,2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA) Notice ofSecond Hearing: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR326070088PHA) Change ofNotice ofPublic Hearing: January 16,2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20080 116-IR-326070088CHA) Change ofNotice ofPublic Hearing: December 3, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20081203-IR-326070088CHA) 326 lAC 6-6-5 326 lAC 7-4-14 SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 326 lAC 6-6-5. ISG Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15; IC 13-17 Sec. 5. (a) In order to implement its nontraditional fttgitive dust control program, Bethlehem shall pnrchase a high pressnre water flnshing trttck and a hactor sweeper with broom and install a water filling station for the flnsher trttck and atankfor the storage and dispensing ofliqnidchemical dustretardant. The following control measnres shall thenbe implemented at the Dnrns Harbor Plant at the specified freqnency. (1) A total oftwenty-fonr (24) miles ofpaved andnnpavedroads as shown in Figttre 1 shallRap #07-88 ISG Burns Harbor LLC April 1, 2009

be conttolled as described below. (A)Atotalof12.7ntilesofpaved 1o d 1 llb w



### atet washing using a flusher trttc a s

## ncr~**cl~ancd ~11** ee (3) times pet w

### eekby section. In addition, at least twice k

## cxcep~ as

## mdt~ated m sttbsection (a)(4) ofthis facilities area will also be w t pet

### w~e ' 7

·9 mtlcs ofthese roads in the primacy 

### e swept usmg a tractor t db

. · flushet trnck. Road shoulders on the 12 7 mil moun

## eroot~ fullowmgthe requited and treated with a chemical d

## ~**tai~s** ofpaved roads wtll be graded as below for unpavedroads Accunmlate:s

## ~~ . ant at the same fiequency specified at least once pet nmnth. · rna enal onroad shoulders will beremoved (D) A total of 11.3 miles ofunpaved toads sh 11 b

. . . forming a unifOrm toad smface b

## ~ d_cre controlled. Tins wrll consist of application ofa two (2) to four (4)Y. rola 1 gra

### t~g to Ietttove latge material, and the shall be sptaycd "VVith dust su mn aye_r o fine slag where necessary. Surfaces the manufacturer's

### teconnnC!~:~:sartt;lu:tt atanapplication

### I~te consistent with rate shall be such that a 

### etnst will

## o~ts£ tc 

# :stsuppressantmatenal and application cleaning \!:ia flushing and sweepit 

# e**;nt~e** 

# o: the road surface that is amenable to with a flusher truck folio d b tg. 4:1a smaces shall be cleaned twice pet week tespta)ed with chemical

### w~st**~** a tractor mounted broom. Road surfaces shall be surface. The solution stren th

## ;'J'ressa~**~s** necessM?' to maintain a cleanable application based upon the

## cr:.di;:on~f:ltcatto~ rate wtll be determined prior to (2) D 11 1 1c sut aces eh e1em shall control its low volatile coal stora
. . . pet week with a chemical dust retardant. geptlesby spraymgthematleast once (3) Records ofallfugitiv c dusteontt:olactiv ities 1 llb . .

. . shall contain the following information. S1cretmuntatned. Atamtntmunt,records (A) rmmbet ofmiles and location ofthe pa cd d 1 (D) b . v roa s c caned tmm 

### ex of mtles of unpa ed road 1. ' quatttity, and

## diluti~n ratio ofiust

## reta:~ar~:~~d,were treated including the type, (C) the type, quantity, and dilution tatio f d coal storage piles. 0 11:st retardant sprayed on low volatile This information shall be sumntarized

. quarterly. tnto progress teports and submitted to the board (4) This nontraditional fugitive dust control

. needed to take into account preced" d progratn can be adjusted on a daily basis as example, rainfall andtemperature)

## ~::~**~y ~n~** forcca_sted meteorological conditions (for cleaned. ' v tsua o 

### set v attons oftheroadways scheduledtobe (b) Bethlehem SteelCorpo f d

.. (Figure l).tatonnontra tttonal fugitive dustcontrol toads is shown as follows

2 

# .!

# •• )



# •

• Rap #07-88 ISG Burns HarborLLC April I, 2009



### (a)EffectiveNovember 17,2007,ISGBurnsHarborLLCshallimplementanapproved fugitive particulate matter emission control plan meeting the**requ~rements** 

### ofthis section. (b) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "As neededbasis"meansthefrequency ofapplicationnecessaryto minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matter emissions" means particulate matter that is emitted from any source by means other than through a stack. (3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage ofmaterial consisting of, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture ofiron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, which is finer than two hundred (200) mesh size 3Rap#07-88 ISG Burns Harbor LLC April 1,2009 equalto or greaterthan onepercent (1 %)byweight. Open aggregate material mesh size shallbe determinedbythe "AmericanAssociation ofStateHighway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74", or other equivalent procedures approved by the commissioner. ( 4) "Pavedroad"meansanyasphaltorconcretesurfacedthoroughfareorrightof-way: (A) designed or used for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or ownedby, an individual or company. (5) "Potentialemissions."meansfugitiveparticulatematteremissionscalculated after the application ofair pollution control: (A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare orright-of-way, other than a paved .road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: (A) designed or used for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an individual or company. (c)ISGBurnsHarborLLC'sfugitiveparticulatematteremissioncontrolplanshallbe in writing and shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) Thenameand address oftheowneroroperatorresponsiblefor theexecution ofthe control plan. (2) Identification ofall: (A) processes; (B) operations; and (C) areas; that havethe potential to emit fugitive particulate matter. (3) A map ofthe source showing the following: (A) Aggregate pile areas. (B)Access areas around the aggregate piles. (C) Unpaved roads. (D)Paved**ro~ds.** (E) Parking lots. (F) Location ofconveyors and transfer points. (G) Other potential sources offugitive particulate matter. (4) The number and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following: (A) Paved roads. (B) Unpaved roads. (C) Parking lots. (5) The type and quantity ofmaterial handled. (6) The equipment used to maintain aggregate piles. 4 

# .)



# •

•

# •

• Rap #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April 1, 2009 (7) A description ofthe measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from emission points identified in subdivision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust suppressant material, such as oil or chemical, including the estimated frequency of application, rates, and concentrations of the dust suppressant. (9) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (10) A schedule of compliance with the provisions of the control plan. The schedule shall specify the amount oftime the source requires to: (A) award any necessary contracts; and (B) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matter emission control measures.· (11) Other relevant data that .QJ.ay be requested by the commissioner to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe control plan. (d) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (1) kept and maintained; (2) retained for at least five (5) years; and (3) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner. (e) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered reasonably available control measures (RACM). The frequency ofapplication for all control measures shall be detailed in each control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violatetheprovisions ofstatestatutesorrules. Fugitiveparticulatematteremissionsfrom the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads, unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blastfurnace slag pitprocessing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and parking lots as follows: (A) Paved roads and paved parking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (i) Cleaning by vacuum sweeping. (ii) Flushing. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pitprocessing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas and unpaved parking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available 5Rap #07-88 ISG Burns Harbor LLC April I, 2009 

### petroleum based dust suppressant or water based dust suppressant approvedbythecommissioner.Thefrequency ofapplication shallbeon an as needed basis. (iii) 

### Sprayingwithwater. Thefrequency ofapplication shallbeon an as needed basis. (iv) Doublechip and sealtheroad surfaceandmaintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equivalent alternate measure. (2) Open aggregate piles by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. (B) 

### Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (3) Outdoorconveying ofaggregatematerial, such as,butnotlimitedto, slagproduced during the manufactureofiron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal,by equipment such as belt conveyors and bucket elevators, by the use of one (1) or more of the following measures: (A) Enclosing the conveyor belt totally on the top and sides as needed to • minimize visible emissions and, ifneeded, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during operation ofconveyor. 1 (B) 

### Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant at the feed point or at intermediate points; or at both, as needed to minimize visible emissions. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. ( 4) Transferringofaggregatematerialshallbecontrolledbytheuse ofone (1) ormore ofthe following measures: (A) Minimizing the distance between the transfer points. (B) 

### Enclosing the transfer points and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulatecontrol equipment duringthe operation ofthe transferring system. (C) Application ofwater or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) 

### An equivalent alternate measure. (5) Transporting aggregate material by truck, front-end loader, or similar vehicle by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) A completely enclosed vehicle. (B) Tarping the vehicle. (C) Maintainingthevehiclebody in such a condition thatprevents any leaks of aggregate material. (D) 

### Spraying the materials in the vehicle with a suitable and effective dust suppressant. 6 

# •

I

# •

•• (E) 

### An equivalent alternate measure. Rap#07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April 1, 2009

(6) 

### Loading and unloading operations ofthe materialfrom storage facilities, such as bins, hoppers, and silos, onto or out ofvehicles by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Enclosure ofthe material loading and unloading area. (B) 

### Total or partial enclosure of the facility and exhausting of emissions to particulate collection equipment. Such equipment shall be approved by the commissioner. (C) Sprayingwith wateror suitable and effective chemical dust suppressantas needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) 

### Reducing the free fall distance. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (7) Hauling and dumping solid waste (as defined in IC 13-11-2-205(a)) as follows: (A) Hauling solid wastebythe use ofone (1) ormore ofthefollowing measures: (i) Wet suppression ofthe material beingtransported. (ii) 

### Hauling the material enclosed or covered. (iii) 

### Minimizing the free fall distance when unloading from the particulatecollection equipmentorfromtheprocessequipmentontothe hauling vehicle, or from both. (iv) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) 

### Dumping solid waste by the use of one (1) or more of the following measures: (i) Applying water or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant on an as needed basis to minimize visible emissions. (ii) 

### Minimizing the free fall distance ofthe material. (iii) 

### An equivalent alternate measure. (8) Material handling operations, such as crushing, grinding, screening, and mixing, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Wet suppression. (B) 

### Enclosure ofemission source with venting ofemissions to a fabric filter. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (9) Building openings, such as doors, windows, powered orunpowered ventilators, or roofmonitors, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Installing a removable filter over appropriate building openings. (B) 

### Capturingemissions within thebuildingbytheuse ofa properhood system and conveying through a ductto particulate collection system approved bythe commissioner. (C) An in-house operating and procedure maintenance program consisting of the following: (i) Proper maintenance of the process equipment and particulate 7

### collection system approved the commissioner. Rap #07-88 ISGBurns Harbor LLC April 1, 2009

{ii) 

### Substitution of the process equipment, material, or operating procedurethatwill minimize visible emissions. {D) 

### An equivalent alternate measure. {:I) 

### Within three {3) months ofreceiving a controlplan, the commissioner shall notify ISG Burns HarborLLC of: {1) the approval ofthe control plan; {2) modificationsthatthecommissionerdeems necessaryto thecontrolplan; or {3) disapproval ofthe control plan. {g) If

### the commissioner finds a control plan to beincomplete, ISGBurnsHarborLLC shall provide the commissioner with the required additionalinformation. {h) In determiningifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following: 

# •

' 

## .)

{1) The impact on the environment in terms ofany increase in water, air, or • solid waste pollution emissions.

. {2) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. ) {3) The: {A) capital expenditure; {B)

### impact on production; and {C) operating costs; to implement the selected control measure. {4) Theimpact ofthese costs. {5) Any adverse worker or product safety implications ofthe selected control measure. {i) If

### a controlplanis disapproved by thecommissioner, ISGBurnsHarborLLC shall have up to fifteen {15) days from the date ofreceipt ofthe disapproval letter to request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: {1) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements set forth in IC 4-21.5; and {2) theburden ofproofshall lie with ISGBurns HarborLLC to demonstrate why the control plan is appropriate. 0) 

### The control plan approved by the commissioner shall become part ofISG Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. (Air Pollution Control Board; 326 lAC 6-6-5;filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20 p.m.: 11 IR 2510; 8 

# •

# •

• readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477) Rap #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April I, 2009

SECTION 2. 326 lAC 7-4-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 326 lAC 7-4-14.Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 13-15; IC 13-17 Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations inpounds permillion Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbslhr), unless otherwise**~pecified,** and otherrequirements: (1) Bethlehem Steel ISG Bums Harbor Works LLC shall comply with the following: (A) The following facilities shall bum natural gas only: (i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24)

. (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) Thefollowing facilities shall complywiththe sulfurdioxide emission limitations and otherrequirements: Facility Description (i) BlastFurnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Fnmace Flare (ivJ (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox tv] (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Under:fire 

## fri1 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire 

## frii7 (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs./MMBtu**lbs~lhr.** 0.83 545 0.83 545 &.eT 1.0 pound per ton400 process material 1.73 1.96 803 911 (AA) No Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits maybe fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eightytwo (482) pounds perhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits maybum blast furnace andfor natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast 9Rap #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April 1,2009

furnace andfornatural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds perhour. 

### friii1 (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 Reheat Furnace No. 1 and BoilerNo. 1 

### 6xJ (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 

### W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.96 No. 1, 2, and 3 (ri)(x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.96 1 and2 6rii] (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 Furnace 

## fxiiit (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.96 Furnaces No.4 and 5 triv} (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.96 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 (xvJ (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnace 1.96 No.8 

## tx"ri1 (xv) Power Station BoilerNo. 7 0.8**~(xvi)** Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 10, 11, and 12 299 299 79 each 441 88 274 274 176 520 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows: Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) BlastFnmace Fla:re fiv1-(iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire (vi) (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire friiT(vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. 0.75 498 0.75 498 &.W 1.0 pound per ton400 process material 1.57 1.78 130 828 (AA) NoNot more than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninetytwo (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may bumblast furnace andfor natural gas, or 10 

# .\

! 

# .}

# • Rap #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April 1, 2009 both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds perhour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits maybum blast furnace andfor natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four (4) pounds perhour. (viii} (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 1 and BoilerNo. 1 6x)-(viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat Furnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 (xf-(ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.78 483 each No. 1, 2, and 3 (xit-(x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.78 401 1 and2 (riiJ (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 88 Furnace (xfu}-(xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78 249 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No.6 andfor 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only. txiv} (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 1.78 249 Furnaces No.6 and 7 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No.4 andfor 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only. txv](xiv) 160 inch PlateMill I & 0 Furnace 1.78 160 No.8 (xvi7 (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520 (xvii]-(xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 total 2,500 total 10, 11, and 12 (xviii) Bethlehem 

### Steel (xvii) ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to reliance on the alternative set oflimits specified in items (i) through 

## fxvii7 Bethlehem Steel (xvi). ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and shall make the records available to the department upon request. (nx7 (xviii) Forthe purposes of326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and for the set ofrequirements specified in clause (B). 11Rap #07-88 ISG Bums HarborLLC April 1, 2009 (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall berestricted to no not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (D)(iv), (B)(vii)(AA) throngh (D)(vii)(BB), (B)(viii) thtongh (B)(xi) (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (B)(xiii) throngh (D)(xvii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds perhour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to no not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(AA)tluongh (C)(viiXBB) (C)(viii) thtongh (C)(xi) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii) tlnongh (C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand six hundred ih.irty (4,630) pounds perhour. (E) Bethlehem Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Bethlehem Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end ofeach calendar quarter containing the following information: (i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) tluongh and (C). (ii) Records ofthe: (AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and ofthe- (BB) maximum number ofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds perhour, pounds permillion Btu, andfor pounds per ton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(AA) throngh (C)(vii)(DB), (C)(viii) tluongh (C)(xi) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii) throngh (C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds perhour during the calendar quarter. (F) Bethlehem Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall: (i) contain a description ofplanned procedures for: (AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; ;-for- (BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; and for (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented 12 

# •

# •

• to the atmosphere The protocol shall ; and Rap #07-88 ISG Bums Harbor LLC April I, 2009

(ii) specify the frequency ofsampling, analysis, andformeasurement for each: (AA) fuel and material; and for each (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, andfor measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days of written notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu (A) Boilers 7 and 8 6.0 each Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 natural gas only (3) Midwest Steel shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie CityBoilersNo. 1,1.33 each 2, and 3 Onlytwo (2) offour (4) boilers may bum fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds permillion Btu at the same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boilerfor each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) AirProducts and Chemical shall comply with the following: Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No.3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (Air Pollution Control Board; 326lAC 7-4-14;fi/edAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 14IR 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477; errata filedDec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 26IR 1568)

13