alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 23 August 2004 by Ontex N.V. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-353/04)

(2004/C 273/68)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 23 August 2004 by Ontex N.V., Buggenhout (Belgium), represented by M. Du Tré, lawyer.

Curon Medical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California (USA) was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
# C_2004288EN.01000101.xml

| 25.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 November 2004

(2004/C 288/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3146 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4305 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9270 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5143 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,06 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5786 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,021 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6824 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4324 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2156 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 474 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,315 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 877 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6687 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5537 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2181 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8481 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1578 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 402,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8432 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3146

JPY

Japanese yen

135,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4305

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69985

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9270

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5143

ISK

Iceland króna

87,06

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5786

CZK

Czech koruna

31,021

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6824

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4324

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2156

ROL

Romanian leu

39 474

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,315

TRL

Turkish lira

1 877 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6687

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5537

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2181

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8481

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1578

KRW

South Korean won

1 402,28

ZAR

South African rand

7,8432

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004190EN.01001302.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/13

---

Appeal brought on 9 June 2004 by M against the judgment given on 21 April 2004 by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) in Case T-172/01 between M and Court of Justice of the European Communities

(Case C-243/04 P)

(2004/C 190/22)

An appeal against the judgment given on 21 April 2004 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-172/01 M v Court of Justice of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 June 2004 by M, represented by H. Tagaras, avocat.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible and well-founded;

| — | set aside the contested judgment and declare that she is entitled to a survivor's pension in accordance with Article 27 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested judgment and declare that she is entitled to a survivor's pension in accordance with Article 27 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs both at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs both at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested judgment is vitiated by a ‘reach of procedure’ and an ‘infringement of Community law’, both within the meaning of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice. The applicant also relies on the European Convention on Human Rights, in particular, on the right to a fair trial.

The plea of ‘breach of procedure’ concerns questions of evidence. It consists of two parts. The first relates to the decision of the Court of First Instance to dismiss, as out of time, two affidavits made before a notary which were produced after the close of the written procedure, but in order to reply to further documents and arguments in the rejoinder. The second is based on the fact that the Court of First Instance failed to take account of two other affidavits which were annexed to the initial claim and the originating application.

The plea alleging infringement of Community law consists of an error of law committed by the Court of First Instance in the application of Article 27 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations, by reason of the incorrect legal classification of the agreement made in the spring of 1999 between the applicant and her ex-husband. The appeal alleges, inter alia, that the contested judgment did not recognise that the 1999 agreement was a maintenance agreement, but arbitrarily and incorrectly characterised it as an act of ‘mere courtesy’.

inter alia

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Training for the Future.                    

*Date:*                         April 6, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide concept review of proposed grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeannette L. Johnson, Ph.D., National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7705,                         *JohnsonJ9@nia.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated:  February 3, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-02437 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Brush Management, Conservation Crop Rotation, Cover Crop, Cross Wind Trap Strips, Dust Control from Animal Activity on Open Lot Surfaces, Fence, Field Border, Firebreak, Herbaceous Weed Control, Herbaceous Wind Barriers, Integrated Pest Management, Mulching, Residue and Tillage Management-Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management-No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management-Ridge Till, Residue Management-Seasonal, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Watering Facility, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
## 16 - 11 - 12 **Complainants Reply to Answer / Motion to Dismiss Exhibit 50** 

See Official Docket File @ FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC. For assistance, please call 202 - 267 - 3473 or 202 - 267 - 3199.
# C_2004300EN.01000802.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 September 2004

in Case C-276/02: Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(State aid - Definition - Non-payment of taxes and social security contributions by an undertaking - Attitude taken by the national authorities following a declaration of suspension of payments)

(2004/C 300/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-276/02: action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought before the Court on 23 July 2002, between Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde) and Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz and J.L. Buendía Sierra) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and F. Macken, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2002/935/EC of 14 May 2002 on the State aid granted to Grupo de Empresas Álvarez. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2002/935/EC of 14 May 2002 on the State aid granted to Grupo de Empresas Álvarez.

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 219 of 14.9.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly  Report of Edison  Renewables,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  September  30, 2004 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Stephen Young
Dated:  November 22, 2004               ___________________________
                                          Stephen D. Young
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Gilla Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, J. Graham Simmonds, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.





Date:
November 14,
2016
By:
/s/
J. Graham
SimmondsName:
J.
Graham SimmondsTitle:
Chief
Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2008

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
# C_2005031EN.01001601.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/16

---

Action brought on 13 December 2004 by Commission of the European Communities against Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-510/04)

(2005/C 31/32)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 December 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Simonsson and W. Wils, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1) | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 February 2002 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States of the Community (1), and in any event by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1)

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 February 2002 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States of the Community (1), and in any event by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2) | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 9 September 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 67 of 9.3.2002, p. 31

1

---
# L_2015259EN.01000101.xml

| 6.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/1

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2015/1776

of 5 October 2015

repealing Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to Council Common Position 2004/487/CFSP of 29 April 2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia (1),

1

Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 (2) provides for the freezing of funds and economic resources of the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities listed in the Annex to that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 (2) provides for the freezing of funds and economic resources of the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities listed in the Annex to that Regulation.

2

| (2) | On 5 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1782 (3) implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 2237 (2015) of 2 September 2015 which terminated the travel ban and asset freeze measures imposed by paragraph 4 of UNSCR 1521 (2003) and paragraph 1 of UNSCR 1532 (2004), respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 5 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1782 (3) implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 2237 (2015) of 2 September 2015 which terminated the travel ban and asset freeze measures imposed by paragraph 4 of UNSCR 1521 (2003) and paragraph 1 of UNSCR 1532 (2004), respectively.

3

| (3) | It is therefore appropriate to repeal Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 with immediate effect, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It is therefore appropriate to repeal Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 with immediate effect,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 5 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

N. SCHMIT

---

(1)  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 116.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 of 29 April 2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia (OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32).

2

(3)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1782 of 5 October 2015 repealing Common Position 2004/487/CFSP concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia and amending Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia (see page 25 of this Official Journal).

3

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 13214-003]

Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a particular phase or issue in a proceeding. The restricted service list should contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is established.

                    The Commission staff is consulting with the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory Council's regulations, 36 CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act,                     *as amended*, (16 U.S.C. 470f), to prepare a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places at the proposed Ravenna Hydroelectric Project.                

On November 21, 2013, Commission staff established a restricted service list for the Ravenna Hydroelectric Project. Since that time, changes have occurred and therefore, the restricted service list is revised as follows:

Replace “Jill Howe, Kentucky Heritage Council” with “Kary Stackelbeck, or Representative, Kentucky Heritage Council.”

Dated: February 2, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02429 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P