alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 16, 2016

NO. 03-15-00783-CV

Wallace L. Hall, Jr., in his Official Capacity as a Regent for the 

University of Texas System, Appellant

v.

William H. McRaven, in his Official Capacity as Chancellor for the 

University of Texas System, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 15, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives notice that members of the Commission and/or Commission staff may attend the following meetings:

North American Electric Reliability Corporation 

Member Representatives Committee and Board of Trustees Meetings 

Board of Trustees Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee, Finance and Audit Committee, Compliance Committee, and Standards Oversight and Technology Committee Meetings

The Westin San Diego, 400 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101.

## February 11 (7:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.) and February 12 (8:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.), 2015

                    Further information regarding these meetings may be found at:                     *http://www.nerc.com/​Pages/​Calendar.aspx.*

The discussions at the meetings, which are open to the public, may address matters at issue in the following Commission proceedings:

Docket No. RR15-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation

Docket No. RR15-3, North American Electric Reliability Corporation

Docket No. RR15-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation

Docket No. RD15-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation

                    For further information, please contact Jonathan First, 202-502-8529, or                     *jonathan.first@ferc.gov*.                

Dated: January 28, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02116 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.12

                         CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO
                   CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF PREFERENCES
               AND RIGHTS OF THE SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
                  STOCK OF THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

    (Pursuant to Section 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of Delaware)



     The Ashton Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

     FIRST:    The name of the corporation is The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
(the "Company").

     SECOND:  A Certificate of Designation of Preferences and Rights of the
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. (the
"Certificate of Designation"), was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware on January 26, 1998, and said Certificate requires
correction as permitted by subsection (f) of Section 103 of the General
Corporation Law of the state of Delaware.

     THIRD: The inaccuracy or defect of such Certificate of Designation is that
said Certificate of Designation omitted reference to the number of shares of
preferred stock that had been designated by resolution of the Board of Directors
as shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as required by subsection (g)
of Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     FOURTH:  The Certificate of Designation shall be corrected to state that,
pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Directors by the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company, the Board of Directors designated by resolution
550,000 shares of the authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock of the
Company as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Ashton Technology Group, Arthur J. Bacci, its
President, this 17/th/ day of August, 1999.



                              THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


                              By: /s/ Arthur J. Bacci
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                     Arthur J. Bacci
                                     President
# C_2004239EN.01001801.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/18

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 July 2004

in Case T-117/02: Grupo El Prado Cervera, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ‘CHUFAFIT’ - Earlier national word and figurative marks ‘CHUFI’ - Likelihood of confusion - Likelihood of association - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 239/36)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-117/02: Grupo El Prado Cervera, SL, established in Valencia (Spain), represented by P. Koch Moreno, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: J.F. Crespo Carrillo and G. Schneider), the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Helene Debuschewitz and Others, as heirs of Johann Debuschewitz, residing at Rösrath-Forsbach (Germany), represented by E. Krings, lawyer — action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 February 2002 (Case R 798/2001-1) concerning the opposition proceedings between Grupo El Prado Cervera, SL, and J. Debuschewitz — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 6 July 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 29.6.2002.

1

---
#### Thiessen v. Ball

(13475).

Affirmed. *Fehl v. Horst,*256 Or 518, 474 P2d 525 (1970). (603 P2d 785)
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015281EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/10 |

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1924

of 26 October 2015

amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| (1) | On 15 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/101/CFSP [(1)](#ntr1-L_2015281EN.01001001-E0001). |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | One deceased person should be deleted from Annexes I and II to that Decision. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| (3) | Decision 2011/101/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Decision 2011/101/CFSP are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision..

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2015281EN.01001001-E0001)  Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP of 15 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe ([OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2011_042_R_TOC)).

---

ANNEX

I.

In Annex I to Decision 2011/101/CFSP, the entry for the following natural person is deleted from the section ‘I. Persons’:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Name (and any aliases) | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | 51. | MIDZI, Amos Bernard (Mugenva) | |

II.

In Annex II to Decision 2011/101/CFSP, the entry for the following natural person is deleted from the section ‘I. Persons’:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Name (and any aliases) | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | 41. | MIDZI, Amos Bernard (Mugenva) | |

---
# C_2004118EN.01004301.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/43

---

Action brought on 25 February 2004 by Jamal Ouariachi against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-82/04)

(2004/C 118/94)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 February 2004 by Jamal Ouariachi, residing in Rabat (Morocco), represented by France Blanmailland, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the defendant to pay a lump sum of EUR 150 000 to the applicant as compensation for the non-material damage which he has sustained; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay a lump sum of EUR 150 000 to the applicant as compensation for the non-material damage which he has sustained;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who has both Moroccan and Spanish nationality and resides in Morocco, has been divorced since 2000 and has visiting rights in respect of his two children, who are in their mother's custody. In 2002, the mother took the children to Sudan where, according to the applicant, she was joining a Commission official then working at the European Union Delegation in Khartoum, Sudan.

The applicant claims that, in order to be able to take the children away from their father and leave Moroccan territory to go to Sudan, his ex-wife had an invitation from the European Union Delegation in Khartoum, and that it is on the basis of that invitation that the Sudanese consulate issued a visa.

Furthermore, the applicant claims that the official in question usurped the applicant's identity by signing the two children's school reports.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1985 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1985

    To provide for the appointment of additional immigration judges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the appointment of additional immigration judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Children Now Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General may appoint 70 additional 
immigration judges in addition to immigration judges currently serving 
as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-69-2014]


Foreign-Trade Zone 155--Calhoun/Victoria Counties, Texas, 
Authorization of Production Activity, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., (Seamless 
Steel Tubes and Pipes), Bay City, Texas

    On September 25, 2014, the Calhoun-Victoria Foreign-Trade Zone, 
Inc., grantee of FTZ 155, submitted a notification of proposed 
production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of 
Tenaris Bay City, Inc., within Subzone 155D, in Bay City, Texas.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (79 FR 59473-59474, 10-2-2014). The 
FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is 
warranted at this time. The production activity described in the 
notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.14.

Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01722 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2004228EN.01004101.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 May 2004

in Case T-61/03: Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Word mark QUICK-GRIP - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Refusal to register - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2004/C 228/93)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-61/03: Irwin Industrial Tool Co., established in Hoffman Estates, Illinois (United States), represented by G. Farrington, Solicitor, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Humphreys and S. Laitinen) — action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 November 2002 (Case R 110/2002-3) refusing to register the word mark QUICK-GRIP as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 27 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.

1

---
#### Wisconsin Brotherhood of Threshermen Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Duffy, Duffy & Hanson,*attorneys, and *Edward T. O’Neill*of counsel, all of Fond clu Lac.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent John J. Purcell: *Hill, Beckwith & Flarrington*of Madison.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeRadioactive WasteDecommissioningRegulations, Guidance, and Communications

# Decommissioning Communications

The following decommissioning correspondence establishes the relationships, roles, and responsibilities of the Federal and State government entities involved in decommissioning reactor and materials sites.
        - Letters and Memoranda
        - Generic Communications
        - Newsletters

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 10, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Decommissioning Communications
          - Decommissioning Regulations
          - Decommissioning Guidance

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 10, 2022
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3427- SITA / SOL / JÄTEÄSSÄT / HYÖTYKESKUS JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 170/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1

(2)OJ C 217, 29.7.2000, p. 32; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 has been replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

----
#### TROTMAN H. WARD *vs.*ELIJAH SMITH.

Where in an action of trover for the conversion of a negro, the declaration designates the negro by the name of *John,*he must prove on the trial that the negro converted was named *John.*

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Chowan County, at the Spring Term, 184S, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.

The plaintiff declared in trover, for the conversion of a negro named John. It appeared, that, on a Saturday night, the defendant delivered to the jailor of Chowan County, at the jail in Edenton, a negro boy, and said he was hired by the plaintiff, and that he was a runaway. The jailor received the boy, put him in jail and kept him there, until Monday morning, when upon the application of the plaintiff, he delivered him to him on his paying his prison fees, two dollars. It was not proved that the name of the negro was John, and there was no evidence that the plaintiff had any interest in any other negro, than the one spoken of by the witness.

The defendant insisted, .that the plaintiff could not recover for two reasons : first, because there was no evidence of the conversion of any negro boy; and secondly, because there was no evidence of the *conversion of the*negro boy John. The presiding Judge charged the jury that there was evidence of a conversion, and, if from the evidence they found, that the defendant so converted a negro boy, and *that it*was John, belonging to the plaintiff, they should find for him.

Under this charge the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff and from the judgment thereon the defendant appealed.

*297
      *Heath,*for the plaintiff.

*Iredell,*for the defendant.

Nash, J.

It is unnecessary we should express any opinion upon the first objection, as our judgment is founded exclusively on the second. The negro, for the conversion of whom the action is brought, is described in the declaration as negro boy John. Having thus identified him, the plaintiff was bound to show that the negro converted was John. This was necessary to the defendant’s safety against another action for the same conversion. The case clearly states, that there was no evidence, that the negro delivered to the jailor by the defendant was named John, or was known by that name. But one witness, and that the jailor, appears to have been examined, and he stated that he did not know the boy’s name. The case then proceeds and states, •' there was no evidence, that the plaintiff had an interest in any other negro than the one spoken of by the witness.” From this statement we gather, that there was no evidence whatever upon that point. Whether, therefore, the plaintiff owned but that one negro, was not proved ; according to the case he might have owned fifty. If, however, he had shown affirmatively that he had but one negro, to enable him to recover under his declaration, it was necessary to prove, that *his*name was John. There was no evidence to be left to the jury, *“*that it was John belonging to the plaintiff,” who was converted. His Honor therefore erred in that part of his opinion.

Per Cokiam. Judgment reversed, and *venire de nov»*ordered.
# C_2004130EN.01S00301.xml

| 6.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

NOTICE TO READERS

A special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union containing the texts of the Acts of the institutions and of the European Central Bank adopted before accession will be published in the Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene languages. The volumes of this edition will be issued gradually between 1 May and the end of 2004.

Official Journal of the European Union

Pending publication, the electronic version of the texts is available on EUR-Lex.

The EUR-Lex site is at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/accession.html

http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/accession.html

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2020

Dam (402)

1. An artificial barrier that can impound water for 

one or more beneficial purposes.

Initial Setting: Sites satisfactory for 

constructing a dam and reservoir 

with watersheds protected from 

erosion and water available in 

sufficient quantity and adequate 

quality.

Start

C.1 (+/-) Income and

income stability 

(individuals & community)

Critical Area Planting (342)

C.2 (+/-) Water quality

C.4 (-) Aquatic and terrestrial 

species

D.2 (-) Peak flows 

and downstream 

flooding

D.4 (+) Permanent 

water storage

Pond (378)

I.3 (+) 

Lacustrine 

habitat

Irrigation Reservoir (436)

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice 

Associated practice

D.1 (+) Cost for 

installation and 

maintenance

I.1 (+/-) Net 

return to 

producer

Fishpond Management (399)

Wetland Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. (644)

I.2 (-) Sediments and 

sediment-borne 

contaminants.

D.3 (-) Gully 

erosion gullies.

I.4 (+) 

Shoreline/streambank 

erosion

D.5 (-) 

Floodplain 

habitat

D.7 (-) Upland 

wildlife habitat

Aquatic Organism 

Passage (396)

D.6 (+) 

Aquatic habitat 

fragmentation

C.5 (+) Aquatic and terrestrial 

wildlife and livestock water

C.3 (+/-) Public health and 

safety

Upland Wildlife Habitat 

Management (645)

Streambank and 

Shoreline Protection 

(580)

Stream Habitat 

Improvement and 

Management (395)

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.