alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HelpMate Robotics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                       |   |               |                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 14, 2002 |   |     | /s/ Mark Szporka                                            |
|                       |   |               |    Mark SzporkaChief Financial Officer  |
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(c)

[LOGO]                          INTERTAN, INC.


                        [LETTERHEAD OF INTERTAN, INC.]

February 19, 2001

Mr. Douglas C. Saunders
3300 Highway # 7
Suite 904
Concord, ON
L4K 4M3

Dear Doug:

       Re: Clarification to Feb 15, 2000 Amendment to Employment Letter

     Your employment letter dated March 10, 1995 was amended by a letter
agreement dated February 15, 2000 (the "Amending Letter Agreement").  By way of
clarification to paragraph 2 of the Amending Letter Agreement, we wish to
confirm that the term "change of control" used therein will be deemed to have
occurred if any of the events described in Sections 8.5 (a), (b) or (c) of
InterTAN, Inc.'s Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, takes place.



                                                         Sincerely,
                                                         InterTAN, Inc.


                                                         /s/ Brian E. Levy

                                                         By: Brian E. Levy
                                                             President and Chief
                                                             Executive Officer
#### Cater, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Underwriters Casualty Company, Appellant.

*April 12*

May *9, 1933.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Stone & Park*of Wausau, and oral argument by *Patrick T. Stone.*

*F. P. Regner*of Wausau, for the respondent.

Fritz, J.

This case and this appeal involve the same facts as were involved in the companion case of *Ruth L. Suschnick v. Underwriters Casualty Co. et al., ante,*p. 474, 248 N. W. 477, which was tried together with this case and the case of Earl Hoenisch vs. the same insurer. The questions of law raised on this appeal are discussed in the decision filed herewith in the case of *Ruth L. Suschnick v. Underwriters Casualty Co., ante,*p. 474, 248 N. W. 477, and that decision also rules this case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard E. Otto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 15,2007 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert T. Atwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2007 

 

/s/ Jack W. Callicutt
Jack W. Callicutt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
USDA’s Office of Urban 

Agriculture and Innovative 

Production was formed through 

the 2018 Farm Bill to improve 

USDA’s support for urban and 

innovative farming operations. 

The office manages competitive 

grants and cooperative 

agreements. A new federal 

advisory committee on urban 

agriculture and innovative 

production and new Farm 

Service Agency urban and 

suburban county committees 

provide the public an opportunity

to have input on USDA programs 

and services.

Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production Grants

USDA is committed to serving all facets of agriculture, including gardens, 

farms, and even indoor operations in urban, suburban, and tribal communities. 

Urban agriculture projects nourish communities with fresh, healthy food; teach 

generations the joy and fulfillment of farming and partnerships; and produce 

environmental benefits by reducing food waste and creating compost that can 

be used in a variety of farming operations.

The Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production (UAIP) Competitive Grants

Program supports a wide range of activities through Planning Projects and

Implementation Projects. Activities include operating community gardens and

nonprofit farms, increasing food production and access in economically distressed

communities, providing job training and education and developing business plans

and zoning. These grants initiate or expand efforts of farmers, gardeners, citizens,

government officials, schools, and other stakeholders in urban areas and suburbs.

Grant Types 

Planning Projects initiate or expand efforts of farmers, gardeners, citizens,

government officials, schools, and other stakeholders in urban areas and suburbs,

particularly where access to fresh foods are limited or unavailable. Projects may

accomplish one or any number of needs such as food access; education; business

and start-up costs for new farmers; and development

of policies related to zoning and other needs of urban and urban agroforestry

production.

Implementation Projects accelerate existing and emerging models of urban,

indoor, and other agricultural practices that serve multiple farmers. Projects will

improve local food access and collaborate with partner organizations and may

support infrastructure needs; emerging technologies; educational endeavors; and

urban farming policy implementation.

AND INNOVATIVE PRODUCTION 

AGRICULTURE

URBAN
URBAN AGRICULTURE: GRANTS 2

 

 

Who is Eligible? 

Nonprofits, local governments, Native American Tribal

governments and organizations, and schools are eligible for

these opportunities.

Learn More 

More information, including a webinar, Frequently Asked

Questions, and news release, is available at farmers.gov/urban.

FACTSHEET • MARCH 2022

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Nuclear Byproduct Material Risk Review (NUREG-1712, Final Report)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1712, Final Report (PDF 5.32 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2000**Date Published:** April 2000

**Prepared by:** D. Serig, J. Lubinski, E. Ullrich, J. Randall, N. Daugherty*

*State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 8100 Lowry Boulevard Denver, CO 80220-6928

Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This project responded to NRC's Direction Setting Issue 12, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Regulation. Its scope was limited to nuclear byproduct materials as defined in Section 1 1.e(l) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 30.4. 10 CFR Parts 30 through 36 and 39 address regulation of those materials. The goal was to confirm and augment information on nuclear byproduct material systems obtained from other sources. The process involved (1) use of a list of nuclear byproduct material systems based on how the nuclear byproduct material was used, (2) a survey of NRC and Agreement State materials licensing and inspection personnel concerning typical annual doses to workers for the various systems, safety of each system under various conditions, the types and frequencies of incidents occurring at each system, definitions of safety, and opinions about the appropriate bases for regulatory decision making, and (3) summarization of the respondent's answers to those questions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360) (5/19) Standard Document(94 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360) CPPE(24.99 KB)

Waste Facility Closure (No.) (360) Network Effects Diagram(215.84 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2004170EN.01000601.xml

| 30.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/6

---

DIRECTORATE–GENERAL FOR PERSONNEL

DIRECTORATE–GENERAL FOR PERSONNEL

Competitions and Selection Procedures Service

OPEN COMPETITION PE/98/A

OPEN COMPETITION

PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATORS

PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATORS

(A5/A4)

Engineers with telecommunications expertise

(2004/C 170/06)

LIST OF SUITABLE CANDIDATES approved on May 26, 2004

| 1. | PARIDANS Pascal |
| --- | --- |

1.

PARIDANS Pascal

| 2. | SCHILT Gilbert |
| --- | --- |

2.

SCHILT Gilbert

| 3. | DELBARE Wim |
| --- | --- |

3.

DELBARE Wim

| 4. | SCHNEIDER Philippe |
| --- | --- |

4.

SCHNEIDER Philippe

| 5. | SESTINI Fabrizio |
| --- | --- |

5.

SESTINI Fabrizio

| 6. | DEBRUE Jean-Marc |
| --- | --- |

6.

DEBRUE Jean-Marc

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5875-5876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01993]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this 
notice to comply with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), which requires agencies to submit proposed 
reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and 
approval, and to publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the 
public that the agency has made such a submission. This notice also 
allows an additional 30 days for public comments.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the information collection by name 
and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Agency Clearance 
Officer, Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street 
SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

[[Page 5876]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 
(202) 205-7030 [email protected]. A copy of the Form OMB 83-1, 
supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review 
may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The Governor of the State, U.S. territory 
or possession affected by a disaster submits this information 
collection to request that SBA issue a disaster declaration. The 
information identifies the time, place and nature of the incident and 
helps SBA to determine whether the regulatory criteria for a disaster 
declaration have been met, and disaster assistance can be made 
available to the affected region.
    Solicitation of Public Comments:
    Comments may be submitted on (a) whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.
    Summary of Information Collections:
    (1) Title: Disaster Business Application.
    Description of Respondents: Governs Request for Disaster 
Declaration.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 31.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 58.
    Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 1,160.

Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2015-01993 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
# C_2004118EN.01004102.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 April 2004

in Case T-308/02: SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Agreements - Fines - Rejection of request for facilities for payment - Annulment of measures - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 118/89)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-308/02: SGL Carbon AG established in Wiesbaden (Germany), represented by M. Klusmann, lawyer v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Wilms and W Mölls) – application for annulment of Commission decision of 24 July 2002 in so far as it rejects the applicant's request for facilities for the payment of the fine imposed in a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (COMP/E-1/36.490 – graphite electrodes) and imposes default interest in excess of 6.04 % – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President; W.H. Meij and J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 8.2.2002.

1

---
<PAGE>
    Exhibit 11.01
 
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

                                                                       HelpMate Robotics Inc.
                                                            Calculation of Net Loss Per Common Share
                                                            ----------------------------------------
                                                                        QUARTER     QUARTER
                                                                         ENDED       ENDED
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                             03/31/97    03/31/96
--------------------------------------------------------------------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                                                   <C>         <C>
Historical
Net Loss............................................................   $(596,993)  $(879,222)
Preferred Dividends.................................................                 (57,147)
                                                                      ----------  ----------
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders..........................   $(596,993)  $(936,369)
                                                                      ----------  ----------
                                                                      ----------  ----------
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding..........................   6,288,507   4,533,812
Incremental Shares Issuable Pursuant to SAB Topic 4D................                  38,553
                                                                      ----------  ----------
Total Shares........................................................   6,288,507   4,572,365
                                                                      ----------  ----------
                                                                      ----------  ----------
Historical Net Loss per Common Share................................      $(0.10)     $(0.21)
                                                                      ----------  ----------
                                                                      ----------  ----------
</TABLE>
- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

**C O U R T O F A P P E A L S**

WHITNEY SCHUSTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 30, 2017

v No. 335246

Kent Circuit Court RIVER OAKS GARDEN APARTMENTS LLC, LC No. 14

- 005418

- NO

Defendant

- Appellee.

Before: H OEKSTRA

, P .J., and S TEPHENS and S HAPIRO , JJ.

H OEKSTRA

, J

. ( concurring ).

I concur in the majority ’s opinion in light of the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in Allison v AEW Capital Mgt, LLP , 481 Mich 419; 751 NW2d 8 (2008) . However, for the reasons stated by Justice Corrigan in her concurring opinion in Allison , I believe that the duty to maintain common areas in a condition that is “fit for the use intended by the parties” applies to “significant, st ructural defects,” and I question whether this statutory duty under MCL 554.139(1)(a) extends “to transitory conditions such as snow and ice accumulations .” Allison

, 481 Mich at 439

- 443 ( C ORRIGAN , J., concurring).

/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2125 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any estimate 

prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee 

on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the public debt, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. BRAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide 

that any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget 

Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation shall include 

costs relating to servicing the public debt, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Budgetary Accuracy 

5 in Scoring Interest Costs Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘BASIC 

6 Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2125 IH

1 SEC. 2. CBO AND JCT ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERV2 ICING COSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Congressional Budget and 

4 Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) 

5 is amended by inserting after section 402 the following: 

6 ‘‘ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE DEBT SERVICING COSTS

7 ‘‘SEC. 403. Any estimate prepared by the Congres8 sional Budget Office under section 402, and any estimate 

9 prepared by the Joint Committee on Taxation, shall in10 clude, to the extent practicable, the costs (if any) of serv11 icing the public debt.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

14 to section 402 the following: 

‘‘403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS