29998 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

applicable, modifying the configuration 

strapping units, installing the outboard 

low-heat detection switches and wing 

A/ICE box assembly and its associated 

wires; and activating the outboard lowheat detection switches; for Bombardier, 

Inc. Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet 

Series 100 & 440) airplanes. 

In the AD as published, the reference 

to Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R– 

30–034, dated November 19, 2007, in 

paragraph (g)(7) of the AD is incorrect. 

The reference to the Bombardier Service 

Bulletin should read Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 601R–31–034, dated 

November 19, 2007. 

No other part of the preamble or 

regulatory information has been 

changed; therefore, only the changed 

portion of the final rule is being 

published in the Federal Register. 

The effective date of this AD remains 

May 6, 2011. 

Correction of Regulatory Text 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

■ In the Federal Register of April 1, 

2011, on page 18028, in the first 

column, paragraph (g)(7) of AD 2011– 

07–06 is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(7) Replacing DCUs P/N 622–9820–007, 

622–9820–008, or 622–9820–009 with 

modified DCUs having P/N 622–9820–010, 

and modifying CSUs, are also acceptable for 

compliance with the requirements of 

paragraph (g)(3) of this AD if done before the 

effective date of this AD, in accordance with 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 601R–31–034, dated 

November 19, 2007. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 13, 

2011. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–12587 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 110502271–1278–01] 

RIN 0694–AF24 

Removal and Modifications for 

Persons Listed Under Russia on the 

Entity List 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule amends the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) by removing one and revising two 

Russian entries on the Entity List 

(Supplement No. 4 to Part 744). This 

final rule removes the Federal Atomic 

Power of Russia (Rusatom) (now known 

as the Russian State Corporation of 

Atomic Energy (Rosatom)) entry from 

the Entity List and adds language 

clarifying that both the All-Russian 

Scientific Research Institute of 

Technical Physics (VNIITF) and the AllRussian Scientific Research Institute of 

Experimental Physics (VNIIEF), which 

are Rosatom components, remain on the 

Entity List. In addition, this rule adds 

additional aliases and revises some of 

the existing aliases for the two Russian 

entries that are being retained on the 

Entity List. These changes will better 

inform exporters, reexporters, and 

transferors of the scope of these Entity 

List-based license requirements. 

The Entity List provides notice to the 

public that certain exports, reexports, 

and transfers (in-country) to parties 

identified on the Entity List require a 

license from the Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) and that availability of 

license exceptions in such transactions 

is limited. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective May 24, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User 

Review Committee, Office of the 

Assistant Secretary, Export 

Administration, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 

3911, E-mail: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Entity List provides notice to the 

public that certain exports, reexports, 

and transfers (in-country) to entities 

identified on the Entity List require a 

license from the Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) and that the availability 

of license exceptions in such 

transactions is limited. Entities are 

placed on the Entity List on the basis of 

certain sections of part 744 (Control 

Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of 

the EAR. 

The End-User Review Committee 

(ERC), composed of representatives of 

the Departments of Commerce (Chair), 

State, Defense, Energy and, when 

appropriate, the Treasury, makes all 

decisions to make additions to, 

removals from and other changes to the 

Entity List. The ERC makes all decisions 

to add an entry to the Entity List by 

majority vote and all decisions to 

remove or modify an entry by 

unanimous vote. The Departments 

represented on the ERC approved these 

changes to the Entity List. 

Entity List Decisions 

In recognition of the bilateral 

partnership between the United States 

and Russia, a policy decision was made 

by the Departments represented on the 

ERC to clarify the Russian entries on the 

Entity List by removing one and revising 

two Russian entities listed on the Entity 

List. The decision implemented by this 

final rule includes removing the Federal 

Atomic Power of Russia (Rusatom) 

(which is now known as the Russian 

State Corporation of Atomic Energy 

(Rosatom)) as an individual entry on the 

Entity List and adding language to 

clarify that two specified Russian 

entries (i.e., the All-Russian Scientific 

Research Institute of Technical Physics 

(VNIITF) and the All-Russian Scientific 

Research Institute of Experimental 

Physics (VNIIEF)) which are Rosatom 

components, are both remaining on the 

Entity List. These revisions further 

clarify that VNIITF and VNIIEF are the 

only Rosatom components remaining on 

the Entity List. This language is being 

added to clarify that neither Rosatom at 

locations outside of Snezhinsk and 

Sarov nor any of its components or 

subsidiaries located outside of 

Snezhinsk and Sarov are subject to the 

Entity List’s supplemental licensing 

requirements and policies. 

In addition, this rule adds other 

aliases and revises some of the existing 

aliases for the two Russian entries that 

are being retained on the Entity List. 

These changes will better inform 

exporters, reexporters, and transferors of 

the scope of these Entity List-based 

license requirements. 

A. Removal From the Entity List 

This rule implements a policy 

decision made by the Departments 

represented on the ERC to remove one 

Russian entity from the Entity List. 

Specifically, this rule removes the 

Federal Atomic Power of Russia 

(Rusatom), which is now known as the 

Russian State Corporation of Atomic 

Energy (Rosatom) from the Entity List. 

However, VNIITF and VNIIEF will 

remain on the Entity List. Moreover, this 

rule adds and revises particular aliases 

of VNIITF and VNIIEF to the Entity List 

to better assist exporters, reexporters 

and transferors in identifying these two 

entities on the Entity List. 

This rule removes the following 

person located in Russia from the Entity 

List: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 29999 

Russia 

(1) Federal Atomic Power of Russia 

(Rusatom) (any entities, institutes, or 

centers associated with), a.k.a. the 

following three aliases: 

—Federal Atomic Agency (FAAE); 

—MINATOM; and 

—Ministry of Atomic Power and 

Industry (MAPI). 

Located in either Snezhinsk or Kremlev 

(Sarov). 

The removal of this entity from the 

Entity List eliminates the existing 

license requirements in Supplement No. 

4 to part 744 for exports, reexports and 

transfers (in-country) to this entity, 

although those licensing requirements 

remain in place for VNIITF and VNIIEF. 

Moreover, the removal of this entity 

from the Entity List does not relieve 

persons of other obligations under part 

744 of the EAR or under other parts of 

the EAR. Neither the removal of an 

entity from the Entity List nor the 

removal of Entity List-based license 

requirements relieves persons of their 

obligations under General Prohibition 5 

in section 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which 

provides that, ‘‘you may not, without a 

license, knowingly export or reexport 

any item subject to the EAR to an enduser or end-use that is prohibited by 

part 744 of the EAR.’’ Nor do these 

removals relieve persons of their 

obligation to apply for export, reexport 

or in-country transfer licenses required 

by other provisions of the EAR. BIS 

strongly urges the use of Supplement 

No. 3 to part 732 of the EAR, ‘‘BIS’s 

‘Know Your Customer’ Guidance and 

Red Flags,’’ when persons are involved 

in transactions that are subject to the 

EAR. 

B. Modifications to the Entity List 

As noted above, this rule is removing 

the Russian entity Rusatom, which is 

now known as Rosatom, from the Entity 

List. However, and also as noted above, 

because Rosatom has components 

(VNIITF and VNIIEF) located in 

Snezhinsk and Sarov that will remain 

on the Entity List, this final rule 

specifies that VNIITF and VNIIEF will 

remain on the Entity List. 

In addition, the changes in the final 

rule include adding additional aliases 

and revising some of the existing aliases 

for VNIITF and VNIIEF to better assist 

exporters, reexporters and transferors in 

identifying these two entities on the 

Entity List. Specifically, this rule revises 

the following two persons on the Entity 

List: 

Note: The asterisks below indicate where 

revisions are being made to these two 

Russian entries on the Entity List. 

Russia 

(1) *All-Russian Scientific Research 

Institute of Technical Physics (VNIITF), 

a.k.a., the following eight aliases: 

*—Vserossiyskiy NauchnoIssledovatelskiy Institut 

Tekhnicheskoy Fiziki; 

*—Russian Federal Nuclear CenterVNIITF (RFNC–VNIITF); 

*—Kasli Nuclear Weapons Development 

Center; 

*—Institute of Technical Physics; 

*—Zababakhin Institute; 

*—ARITP (All Russian Institute for 

Technical Physics); 

—Federal State Unitary Enterprise 

Russian Federal Nuclear Center— 

Academician E.I. Zababkhin AllRussian Scientific Research Institute 

of Technical Physics (FGUPRFYaTs– 

VNIITF) 

—Chelyabinsk—70, 

(Address: P.O. Box 245, 456770, 

Snezhinsk, Chelyabinsk Region Russia); 

and 

*Any nuclear-related entities, institutes 

or centers located in Snezhinsk. 

(2) *All-Russian Scientific Research 

Institute of Experimental Physics 

(VNIIEF), a.k.a., the following nine 

aliases: 

*—Vserossiyskiy NauchnoIssledovatelskiy Institut 

Eksperimentalnoy Fiziki; 

*—Russian Federal Nuclear CenterVNIIEF (RFNC–VNIIEF); 

*—Institute of Experimental Physics; 

*—ARIEP (All Russian Institute for 

Experimental Physics); 

—Khariton Institute; 

—Sarov Nuclear Weapons Plant; 

—Avangard Electromechanical Plant; 

—Federal State Unitary Enterprise 

Russian Federal Nuclear Center—All 

Russian Scientific Research Institute 

of Experimental Physics (FGUPRFNCs 

VNIIEF) 

—Arzamas—16, 

(Address: 37 Mira Ave. Sarov, Nizhny 

Novgorod Region, 607188 Russia); and 

* Any nuclear-related entities, institutes 

or centers located in Sarov (Kremlev). 

A BIS license is required for the 

export, reexport or transfer (in-country) 

of any item subject to the EAR to the 

persons described above, including any 

transaction in which this listed entity 

will act as purchaser, intermediate 

consignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser of the items. This listing of these 

entities also prohibits the use of license 

exceptions (see part 740 of the EAR) for 

exports, reexports and transfers (incountry) of items subject to the EAR 

involving this entity. 

Although the Export Administration 

Act expired on August 20, 2001, the 

President, through Executive Order 

13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 

Comp., p. 783 (2002), as extended by the 

Notice of August 12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 

(August 16, 2010), has continued the 

Export Administration Regulations in 

effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has been designated a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ although not 

economically significant, under section 

3(f) of Executive Order 12866. 

Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget. 

2. Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, no person is required 

to respond to nor be subject to a penalty 

for failure to comply with a collection 

of information, subject to the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Control Number. This regulation 

involves collections previously 

approved by the OMB under control 

numbers 0694–0088, ‘‘Multi-Purpose 

Application,’’ which carries a burden 

hour estimate of 58 minutes to prepare 

and submit form BIS–748. 

Miscellaneous and recordkeeping 

activities account for 12 minutes per 

submission. Total burden hours 

associated with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act and Office and 

Management and Budget control 

number 0694–0088 are not expected to 

increase as a result of this rule. You may 

send comments regarding the collection 

of information associated with this rule, 

including suggestions for reducing the 

burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb. 

eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395–7285. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 

13132. 

4. The provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553) requiring notice of proposed 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
30000 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

rulemaking, the opportunity for public 

comment and a delay in effective date 

are inapplicable because this regulation 

involves a military or foreign affairs 

function of the United States. (See 5 

U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). The U.S. 

Government’s original basis for adding 

the entities affected by this rule to the 

Entity List was the entities’ involvement 

in activities contrary to U.S. national 

security or foreign policy interests. BIS 

implements this rule to further protect 

U.S. national security and foreign policy 

interests by preventing items from being 

exported, reexported or transferred (incountry) to these persons listed on the 

Entity List by making clarifications to 

the existing entries to inform exporters, 

reexporters and persons making 

transfers (in-country) of the intended 

scope of the license requirements for 

these listed persons. This action does 

this by clarifying the listings of VNIITF 

and VNIIEF, clarifying the names of 

existing aliases, and adding aliases for 

the listed persons. If this rule were 

delayed to allow for notice and 

comment and a delay in effective date, 

there is a chance that certain exporters, 

reexporters and persons making 

transfers (in-country) to these listed 

persons may inadvertently export, 

reexport or transfer (in-country) to a 

listed person on the Entity List because 

the exporter, reexporter or person 

making the transfer (in-country) did not 

realize the listed person was subject to 

the Entity List-based license 

requirement because of perceived 

ambiguity regarding the listed person, 

such as a perceived ambiguity resulting 

from the use of an alias by a listed 

person. There is also a chance an 

exporter, reexporter or person making a 

transfer (in-country) may turn away a 

potential export, reexport, or transfer 

(in-country) because the customer 

incorrectly appeared to be within the 

scope of a listed person on the Entity 

List, thereby harming U.S. economic 

interests. The clarification of language 

provided in this rule may make clear 

that the person was not subject to an 

Entity List-based license requirement. 

For these reasons there is a public 

interest that these changes be 

implemented as a final action. Further, 

no other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this rule. Because a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required to be given for this rule by 5 

U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the 

analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq., are not applicable. 

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744 

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Terrorism. 

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (15 CFR 

parts 730–774) is amended as follows: 

PART 744—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 744 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 

42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 

U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 

3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 

FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 

12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 

356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 

Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 

CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 

44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 

13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 

786; Notice of August 12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 

(August 16, 2010); Notice of November 4, 

2010, 75 FR 68673 (November 8, 2010); 

Notice of January 13, 2011, 76 FR 3009 

(January 18, 2011). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is 

amended: 

■ a. By removing under Russia, the 

Russian entity, Federal Atomic Power of 

Russia (Rusatom); and 

■ b. By revising, under Russia, the 

following two Russian entities: AllRussian Scientific Research Institute of 

Technical Physics (VNIITF) and AllRussian Scientific Research Institute of 

Experimental Physics (VNIIEF). 

The revisions read as follows: 

Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity 

List 

Country Entity License 

requirement License review policy Federal Register citation 

*******

RUSSIA ..... All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics (VNIITF), a.k.a., the following 

eight aliases: 

For all items subject to 

the EAR.

Case-by-case basis ....... 62 FR 35334, 6/30/97 

66 FR 24267, 5/14/01 

75 FR 78883, 12/17/ 

10. 

—Vserossiyskiy Nauchno-Issledovatelskiy 

Institut Tekhnicheskoy Fiziki; 

***76 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 5/ 

24/11. 

—Russian Federal Nuclear Center-VNIITF 

(RFNC–VNIITF); 

—Kasli Nuclear Weapons Development Center; 

—Institute of Technical Physics; 

—Zababakhin Institute; 

—ARITP (All Russian Institute for Technical 

Physics); 

—Federal State Unitary Enterprise Russian 

Federal Nuclear Center—Academician E.I. 

Zababkhin All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics (FGUPRFYaTs-VNIITF) 

—Chelyabinsk-70, (Address: P.O. Box 245, 

456770, Snezhinsk, Chelyabinsk Region Russia); 

and any nuclear-related entities, institutes, or 

centers located in Snezhinsk. 

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Physics (VNIIEF), a.k.a., the following nine aliases: For all items subject to 

the EAR. 

Case-by-case basis ....... 62 FR 35334, 6/30/97 

66 FR 24267, 5/14/01 

75 FR 78883, 12/17/ 

10. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 30001 

Country Entity License 

requirement License review policy Federal Register citation 

—Vserossiyskiy Nauchno-Issledovatelskiy 

Institut Eksperimentalnoy Fiziki; 

***76 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER], 5/ 

24/11. 

—Russian Federal Nuclear Center-VNIIEF 

(RFNC–VNIIEF); 

—Institute of Experimental Physics; 

—ARIEP (All Russian Institute for Experimental 

Physics); 

—Khariton Institute; 

—Sarov Nuclear Weapons Plant; 

—Avangard Electromechanical Plant; 

—Federal State Unitary Enterprise Russian 

Federal Nuclear Center—All Russian Scientific 

Research Institute of Experimental Physics 

(FGUPRFNCs VNIIEF) 

—Arzamas-16, (Address: 37 Mira Ave. Sarov, 

Nizhny Novgorod Region, 607188 Russia); and 

any nuclear-related entities, institutes or centers 

located in Sarov (Kremlev) 

* * * * * * * 

Dated: May 19, 2011. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–12803 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

22 CFR Part 126 

RIN 1400–AC83 

[Public Notice 7466] 

Amendment to the International Traffic 

in Arms Regulations: Libya 

AGENCY: Department of State. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of State is 

amending the International Traffic in 

Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the 

policy regarding Libya to reflect the 

United Nations Security Council arms 

embargoes adopted in February and 

March. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective May 24, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicholas Memos, Office of Defense 

Trade Controls Policy, Department of 

State, by telephone: (202) 663–2804; fax: 

(202) 261–8199; or e-mail: 

memosni@state.gov. Attn: Part 126, 

Libya. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 26, 2011, the United Nations 

Security Council adopted Resolution 

1970, paragraph 9 of which provides 

that U.N. member states shall 

immediately take the necessary 

measures to prevent the sale, supply or 

transfer of arms and related materiel of 

all types to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 

with certain exceptions. Additionally, 

on March 17, 2011, the U.N. Security 

Council adopted Resolution 1973, 

paragraph 4 of which authorizes 

member states to take all necessary 

measures, notwithstanding the arms 

embargo established by paragraph 9 of 

Resolution 1970, to protect civilians and 

civilian populated areas under threat of 

attack in Libya. This rulemaking 

implements the Security Council’s 

actions within the ITAR by adding 

Libya to § 126.1(c) and revising the 

previous policy on Libya contained in 

§ 126.1(k) to announce a policy of denial 

for all requests for licenses or other 

approvals to export or otherwise transfer 

defense articles and services to Libya, 

except where not prohibited under 

UNSC embargo and determined to be in 

the interests of the national security and 

foreign policy of the United States. 

Regulatory Analysis and Notices 

Administrative Procedure Act 

The Department of State is of the 

opinion that controlling the import and 

export of defense articles and services is 

a foreign affairs function of the United 

States Government and that rules 

implementing this function are exempt 

from § 553 (Rulemaking) and § 554 

(Adjudications) of the Administrative 

Procedure Act. Since this rule is exempt 

from 5 U.S.C. 553, it is the view of the 

Department of State that the provisions 

of § 553(d) do not apply to this 

rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is 

effective upon publication. The 

Department also finds that, given the 

national security issues surrounding 

U.S. policy towards Libya, that notice 

and public procedure on this rule would 

be impracticable, unnecessary, or 

contrary to the public interest. See 5 

U.S.C. 808(2). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Since this amendment is not subject 

to the notice-and-comment procedures 

of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require 

analysis under the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

This amendment does not involve a 

mandate that will result in the 

expenditure by State, local, and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more 

in any year and it will not significantly 

or uniquely affect small governments. 

Therefore, no actions were deemed 

necessary under the provisions of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995. 

Executive Order 13175 

The Department has determined that 

this rule will not have tribal 

implications, will not impose 

substantial direct compliance costs on 

Indian tribal governments, and will not 

pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the 

requirements of Section 5 of Executive 

Order 13175 do not apply to this rule. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 

This amendment has been found not 

to be a major rule within the meaning 

of the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. 

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132 

This amendment will not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1