alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72431) pertaining to the AVTEAM, Inc. 1996 Stock
Option Plan of our reports dated February 12, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of AVTEAM, Inc. included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
March 26, 1999
#### ACME MARKETS, INC., Appellant, v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1357.

No. 15228.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 1, 1965.

Decided April 22, 1965.

M. Kalman Gitomer, Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Rome, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

David Seliger, Plone, Tomar, Parks & Seliger, Camden, N. J., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and FOR-MAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and have considered the arguments of the parties. We can perceive no error in the disposition of the cause and we therefore will affirm upon the excellent opinion of Judge Wood, 235 F.Supp. 814 (E.D.Pa.1964).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1946 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1946

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to require reporting by the 
  National Institutes of Health on requests for funding research that 
 were not granted and had the greatest potential for improving public 
                    health, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to require reporting by the 
  National Institutes of Health on requests for funding research that 
 were not granted and had the greatest potential for improving public 
                    health, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Missed Opportunities Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTING BY NIH ON MISSED OPPORTUNITIES.

    The Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) is amended by 
inserting after section 403D of such Act (42 U.S.C. 283a-3) the 
following:

``SEC. 403E. ANNUAL REPORTING ON MISSED OPPORTUNITIES.

    ``(a) In General.--Not later than the last day of the first fiscal 
quarter following the end of each fiscal year, the Director of NIH 
shall submit a report to Congress--
            ``(1) identifying--
                    ``(A) the total number of requests that were under 
                review during such fiscal year by any office, agency, 
                institute, or center of the National Institutes of 
                Health for funding, in whole or in part, research; and
                    ``(B) of such total number--
                            ``(i) the number of such requests that were 
                        granted;
                            ``(ii) the number of such requests that 
                        were denied; and
                            ``(iii) the number of such requests that 
                        remained pending at the end of the fiscal year; 
                        and
            ``(2) of the requests that were denied or remained pending, 
        as described in clauses (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (1)(B), 
        identifying the requests with the greatest potential for 
        improving public health.
    ``(b) Trade Secrets and Confidential Information.--This section 
does not authorize the Secretary to disclose any information that is a 
trade secret or confidential information subject to section 552(b)(4) 
of title 5, United States Code, or section 1905 of title 18, United 
States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004213EN.01000801.xml

| 25.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3354 — SANOFI-SYNTHELABO/AVENTIS)

(2004/C 213/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3354. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3354. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
# C_2004228EN.01001702.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/17

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 28 June 2004

in Case C-445/02 P: Glaverbel SA v OHIM (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Community trade mark - Design applied to the surface of goods - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character)

(2004/C 228/33)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-445/02 P: Glaverbel SA, established in Brussels (Belgium), (Lawyer: S. Möbus) — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2002 in Case T-36/01 Glaverbel v OHIM (glass-sheet surface) [2002] ECR II-3887, seeking to have that judgment set aside in so far as the Court of First Instance held that the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) did not infringe Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) by adopting its decision of 30 November 2000 refusing to register a design applied to the surface of glass products as a Community trade mark (Case R 137/2000-1), the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and R. Thewlis), defendant at first instance — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and J. Makarczyk, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 28 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Glaverbel SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Glaverbel SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryPhotos & Video

# Guidelines for Use of Photos

The Photo Gallery contains a wide range of free, high-quality photos related to the NRC and its regulatory mission. Unless otherwise indicated, the images are in the public domain and may be reproduced freely.

## General Conditions

        - Absent explicit notice, NRC images are not copyrighted.
        - You may use non-copyrighted NRC photographs or graphics for any purpose, including educational or informational purposes, including photo collections, textbooks, public exhibits and Internet Web pages.
        - Some materials may contain a specific Copyright Notice. It is your responsibility to contact the copyright owner and to obtain permission before making use of this material.
        - Please acknowledge NRC as the source of NRC material. The credit line should read  NRC/<photographer’s name> , or without a photographer’s name,  NRC File Photo .
        - NRC materials may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by the NRC or by any NRC employee of a commercial product, service or activity, or be used in any other manner that might mislead the public.
        - NRC materials may not be sold individually or included in stock photo collections for re-sale.
        - NRC materials cannot be used in advertisements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Guidelines for Use of Photos
          - Contact Us About Photos

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2004201EN.01002401.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/24

---

Action brought on 10 June 2004 by the Kingdom of Spain against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-209/04)

(2004/C 201/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 June 2004 by the Kingdom of Spain, represented by N. Díaz Abad, Abogado del Estado, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to take a decision within a reasonable time on the authorisations applied for by the Spanish authorities, the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(3) of Regulation No 2792/99, as amended by Regulation No 2369/02, and is thereby liable for failure to act; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take a decision within a reasonable time on the authorisations applied for by the Spanish authorities, the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(3) of Regulation No 2792/99, as amended by Regulation No 2369/02, and is thereby liable for failure to act; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The Spanish authorities applied to the Commission for a series of exemptions in order to be in a position to grant the aid for the constitution of joint enterprises provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/99 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/02 of 20 December 2002
   (1). Where the vessel is transferred to a third country with which there is no fisheries agreement with the European Community, it is necessary for the Commission to grant the appropriate derogation (Article 7(3) of Regulation No 2792/99, as amended by Regulation No 2369/02). The aid may only be granted by the national authorities until 31 December 2004.

A formal request was made to the Commission on 16 February 2004 asking it to take a decision on the pending applications and, since no decision has been taken on any of them, the Kingdom of Spain has decided to bring an action against the Commission, having regard also to the fact that the Spanish authorities, which are waiting for the Commission's decision on the derogations applied for, have already exceeded the periods allowed them by national legislation and within which they should reach a decision.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002 of 20 December 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector (OJ L 358 of 31.12.2002, p. 49).

---
# L_2015146EN.01000101.xml

| 11.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/888

of 29 May 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Arroz Carolino do Baixo Mondego’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. — Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 25, 24.1.2015, p. 18.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
# L_2015008EN.01000201.xml

| 14.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/37

of 6 January 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Klenovecký syrec (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia's application to register the name ‘Klenovecký syrec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia's application to register the name ‘Klenovecký syrec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Klenovecký syrec’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Klenovecký syrec’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Klenovecký syrec’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 January 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 269, 15.8.2014, p. 2.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Pumping Plant

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS JENKINS, a/k/a TJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:13-cr-00168-F-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Michael Duffy, Roberto 

Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jennifer 

E. Wells, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 5:13-cr00168-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2015). We deny Jenkins’ motion for 

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,697,000               7,532,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  914,000               1,430,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,193,000               1,430,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,586,000              12,099,000
<PP&E>                                       4,585,000               4,092,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,642,000               1,933,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,831,000              14,728,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,548,000               1,544,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        63,000                  63,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,117,000              13,094,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,831,000              14,728,000
<SALES>                                      2,275,000               1,590,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,275,000               1,590,000
<CGS>                                        1,350,000               1,098,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,432,000               2,556,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (67,000)               (112,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (90,000)               (854,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (90,000)               (435,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,000)               (550,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.09)


</TABLE>