alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2099 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2099

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to consider certain time spent 
 by members of reserve components of the Armed Forces while receiving 
medical care from the Secretary of Defense as active duty for purposes 
  of eligibility for Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2017

  Mr. Takano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to consider certain time spent 
 by members of reserve components of the Armed Forces while receiving 
medical care from the Secretary of Defense as active duty for purposes 
  of eligibility for Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GI Bill Fairness Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN TIME SPENT RECEIVING MEDICAL CARE FROM 
              SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AS ACTIVE DUTY FOR PURPOSES OF 
              ELIGIBILITY FOR POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3301(1)(B) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting ``12301(h),'' after ``12301(g),''.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall apply as if such amendment were enacted immediately after the 
enactment of the Post- 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 
(Public Law 110-252).
                                 <all>
```
#### JAMES R. LOVE AND *AL.*vs. HUGH JOHNSTON AND *AL.*

'Where there is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in a cause, and this parties proceed to the trial of the cause, without waiting for the decision of the matter appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed at the cost3 tjf the appellant. ‘

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of McDoweíl county, Spring Term, *Í849,*his fíonor Judge Bailey presiding. ’

. *Avery*and *Gaither*for the plaintiffs;

*j. W. Woodjin,*for the'defendants.

Ruffin, C. J.

This appeal arose out of the case between these parties upon the caveat of Robert Love’s will, decided at this term. At a previous term of the Superior Court, Upon affidavit, James R; Love, one of the propounders and an executor, moved the Court for a rule on one James Gudger, who was a devisee in the will of 1842, and named an executor; to bring in the unfinished wills of the deceased, to be used as evidence for the propounders; ánd also; for another rule upon the caveators and Gudger, to show pause why Gudger’s name should hot be struck out of the record, as a propounder, upon the ground, that he was acting in collusion with’ the caveators. Both rules were refused, upon ihe ground, that the Court had not the power' to do those acts, although the presiding Judge considered the facts set forth in the affidavit to be true; but he allow* id an appeal to this Court. Before the case was brought on in this Court, the parties brought the issue on the will to’ *368trial, and there was sentence for the script of 1842, propounded by the said James R. Love and others, and the other party appealed. It appeared in the latter transcript, that before the trial, Gudger withdrew from the cause, as a propounder, and took the other side, and also, that the unfinished wills were produced on the trial.

The Court perceives in the record of the other case between these parties, that the appellants have thought proper to go to trial, without awaiting the decision of this Court on the interlocutory orders, from which this appeal was ab lowed; so that, in fact, the present does not, in substance, differ from a feigned case. It is not proper, therefore, to decide the questions; but we think the appeal should be dismissed with costs.

Pee Curiam. Ordered accordingly.
HomeNRC Library

# Photos & Video

Welcome to the NRC's photo and video web portal. Through a variety of file sharing resources you can obtain photographs, graphics and videos illustrating who we are and what we do.
        - NRC Flickr Photostream
        - Webcast Portal/Video Archive
        - NRC YouTube Channel
        - Contact Us

Photographs and other graphic materials produced by the federal government are not subject to copyright restrictions. However, some photographs included in this collection may be copyrighted. Please read and follow the guidelines for use.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Basic References
          - Controlled Unclassified Information Program (CUI)
          - Document Collections
          - ADAMS Public Documents
          - Licensing Support Network (LSN) Library
          - Training Courses
          - Public Document Room
          - Get Copies of Documents
          - FOIA & Privacy Act
          - Photos & Video
          - Records Management
          - Withholding of Sensitive Information
          - FAQ Index

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 10, 2021
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kensey Nash
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  May 17, 2004                 /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                    ----------------------
                                    Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                    Chief Executive Officer





                                       30
# Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334) (9/15) Standard Document(54.15 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334) Overview(301.63 KB)

Controlled Traffic Farming (Ac.) (334) Network Diagram(58.6 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
#### Chafee, Administratrix, Appellant, vs. Scandrett and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Hayden & Hayden*of Milwaukee.

For the respondents : *Bender, Trump •& McIntyre*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeRadioactive WasteStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

# Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation – Public Involvement

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has a long-standing practice of conducting our regulatory, licensing, and oversight activities in an open manner. For that reason, we are committed to informing the public and providing opportunities to participate in our decisionmaking process regarding regulation of spent nuclear fuel storage and transportation, extended storage of spent fuel, and transportation of spent fuel after extended storage periods. Toward that end, we periodically hold meetings, conferences, and workshops to inform the public or solicit input. We also occasionally publish documents for public comment. The staff may use information obtained from the public to inform our regulations, guidance, licensing, and inspection processes; environmental reviews; or other activities.

For general information about available opportunities for public involvement in NRC activities, see Public Meetings and Involvement, Hearing Opportunities and License Applications, and NUREG/BR-0215, "Public Involvement in the Regulatory Process."

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 27, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Spent Fuel Pools
          - Dry Cask Storage
          - Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF)
          - Regulations, Guidance, and Communications
          - Licensing
          - Oversight
          - Public Involvement

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 27, 2021
EXHIBIT 99.2



                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer of Fresh Brands, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
the Company for the year ended December 29, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Elwood F. Winn
   ----------------------------------
    Elwood F. Winn
    President and Chief Executive Officer


March 27, 2003


<PAGE>




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Fresh
Brands, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 29, 2001
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ S. Patric Plumley
   ------------------------------------------------
    S. Patric Plumley
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
    Treasurer and Secretary


March 27, 2003
#### State, Respondent, vs. Little, Appellant.

*October 5*

October *24, 1916.*

*State v. Lewis, ante,*p. 363, followed.

Appeal from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: John J. Gkegoey, Circuit Judge.

*Dismissed as to one order; the other order affirmed.*

The appeal is from two orders of the circuit court, one striking out certain portions of defendant’s answer and the other sustaining a demurrer to a part of said answer.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Rubin, Fawcett & Dutcher,*attorneys, and *Paul R. Newcomb,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Newcomb.*

*A. 0. Umbreit,*counsel, and *Winfred 0. Zabel,*district attorney for Milwaukee county, for the respondent.

Eschweilek, J.

The situation presented and the questions raised in this case are the same in substance as those in the case of *State v. Lewis, ante,*p. 363, 159 N. W. 746. What is said in that case applies here and the same judgment should follow.

*By the Court.*— The appeal from the order striking out part of the answer is dismissed and the order sustaining the demurrer to a part of the answer affirmed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
# Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) (10/2020) Standard Document(77.29 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) Overview(382.6 KB)

Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) CPPE(25.18 KB)

Forage Harvest Management (Ac.) (511) Network Diagram(79.21 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                               HINES HORTICULTURE
                            CERTIFCATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ferguson, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                               By: /s/ Robert A. Ferguson
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Robert A. Ferguson
                                                   CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                                                   (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

April 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I

I J 'r 

### SERVED: October 9, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF DESHAUN BLACKETT FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0850 

### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On orbefore January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. The parties shall bepreparedto presentthis case at a hearing on or after January 9, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin · U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Deshaun L. Blackett, Respondent 

### 10671 Hamilton Plaza Apt. 402 Omaha, NE 68114-2078 TEL: (NONE PROVIDED) FAX: (NONE PROVIDED) ONE COPY



### Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofRegional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 Federal Aviation Administration 901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3765 FAX: 816-329-3771 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0850 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
Unitil Corporation - Compensation of Directors



 Exhibit 10.21 

 
 UNITIL CORPORATION 

 
 Compensation of Directors 

 
 On December, 16, 2010, the Board of Directors of Unitil Corporation
(“Unitil”) approved and adopted a revised compensation arrangement for members of the Board of Directors. The compensation arrangement became effective on January 1, 2011. 
  
 The compensation arrangement applies to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of Unitil or any of its
subsidiaries. The following table summarizes the material terms of the compensation arrangement. 
  

					
	 Category
	  	 Description
	  	 Amount

	 Board of Directors –

Annual Cash Retainer
	  	Each member of the Board of Directors will receive an annual cash retainer. Unitil will pay one-fourth of the annual cash retainer on the first business day of each fiscal
quarter.	  	$45,000 per year
			
	 Board of Directors –

Annual Equity Retainer
	  	Each member of the Board of Directors will receive an annual equity retainer. Unitil will issue the equity retainer on the first business day of October each year. In 2011, the
equity retainer will be in the form of Unitil’s common stock. Beginning in 2012, each member may elect to receive restricted stock units (with any phantom dividends reinvested in additional restricted stock units), in lieu of Unitil’s
common stock, as his or her annual equity retainer.	  	$20,500 per year (payable in kind as common stock or restricted stock units)
			
	 Board of Directors –

Special Meetings
	  	Each member of the Board of Directors will receive a fee for each special meeting of the Board of Directors that such member attends in person.	  	$2,000 per special meeting
			
	 Committees –

Annual Cash Retainer for Chair
	  	Each chair of a committee of the Board of Directors will receive an annual cash retainer. Unitil will pay one-fourth of the annual cash retainer on the first business day of each
fiscal quarter.	  	$8,000 per committee per year
			
	 Committees –

Annual Cash Retainer for Non-Chair Members
	  	Each non-chair member of a committee of the Board of Directors will receive an annual cash retainer. Unitil will pay one-fourth of the annual cash retainer on the first business
day of each fiscal quarter.	  	$3,000 per committee per year

  
 In addition, Unitil will reimburse each member of the Board of Directors for reasonable expenses that such member incurs in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees
thereof.