alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 23

- 2544

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kayla Dee Jeffries

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________

Submitted: March 11, 2024 Filed: July 12, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, Chief Judge, ERICKSON and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

A n Iowa trooper pulled over Kayla Dee Jeffries and found more than nine kilograms of methamphetamine in her U

- Haul. She pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, 21-2- U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). The district court 1 varied down from a Guidelines range of 135 to 168 months in prison and sentenced her to 108 months. Jeffries appeals, arguing that her sentence is substantively unreasonable

.

We review a sentence ’ s substantive reasonableness for abuse of discretion. United States v. Levy , 18 F.4th 1019, 1023 (8th Cir. 2021). A district court abuses
its discretion when it “ fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors. ” Id. (citation omitted). Where, as here, the court varies below the Guidelines, we presume that
the senten ce is reasonable. United States v. Barraza, 982 F.3d 1106, 1116 (8th Cir. 2020). It is “ nearly inconceivable ” that the court abused its discretion by not varying
down even further. Id. (citation omitted).

Jeffries argues that the district court should have given greater weight to her mitigating circumstances: s he suffered childhood trauma

, had a history of drug use

,

was a victim of domestic and sexual abuse

, relinquished her parental rights over her
children

, and tried to cooperate with the Government before her drug dealing got in the way . The court recognized that she had “ suffered major trauma, both as a child and as an adult, ” and had “ severe addiction issues. ” But it concluded that 108
months was the appropriate sentence because she had committed a “ serious offense ” involving a lot of drugs and had received l enient sentences in the past, showing that a longer one was “ necessary this time. ” Its decision to “ assign relatively greater weight ” than she would have liked to the seriousness of her offense and the need to deter her from committing crimes was well within its discretion. See United States
v. Wi secarver , 6 44 F.3d 764

, 774 (8th Cir. 201 1)

.

We affirm the district court ’ s judgment.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephen H. Locher, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           5,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                       240
<INVENTORY>                                     16,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,683
<PP&E>                                          17,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,020
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,774
<SALES>                                         27,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,772
<CGS>                                           26,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (20)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (238)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
No. D-960.

#### In re Disbarment of Broadhurst.

It is ordered that Kenneth Lynn Broadhurst, of Englewood, Colo., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/Anton J. Drescher



Anton J. Drescher,

Chief Executive Officer



October 11, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           293,120
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,390
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            8,652
<EQUITIES>                                     5,323
<MORTGAGE>                                     691
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 312,162
<CASH>                                         6,039
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             17,800
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         13,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 406,503
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                174,435
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            71,209
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 15,566
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          144,238
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   406,503
<PREMIUMS>                                     181,756
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            19,119
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             451
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,033
<BENEFITS>                                     134,302
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    47,233
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  3.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.52
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 156,622
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            138,201
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,899)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             70,098
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               48,245
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                174,435
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        3,914
        


</TABLE>
# L_2016058DE.01005901.xml

| 4.3.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 58/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 58/59

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/2462 der Kommission vom 30. Oktober 2015 zur Änderung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1268/2012 der Kommission über die Anwendungsbestimmungen für die Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 966/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Haushaltsordnung für den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 342 vom 29. Dezember 2015
  )

Seite 17, Artikel 1 Nummer 9 zur Änderung von Artikel 128 Absatz 2 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1268/2012:

Anstatt:

„Beim Verhandlungsverfahren, beim wettbewerblichen Dialog, bei der Innovationspartnerschaft, bei der Erkundung des lokalen Marktes gemäß Artikel 134 Absatz 1 Buchstabe g ...“

muss es heißen:

„Beim Verhandlungsverfahren (competitive procedure with negotiation), beim wettbewerblichen Dialog, bei der Innovationspartnerschaft, bei der Erkundung des lokalen Marktes gemäß Artikel 134 Absatz 1 Buchstabe g ...“

competitive procedure with negotiation

Seite 42, Artikel 1 Nummer 9 zur Änderung von Artikel 159 Absatz 3 Ziffer ii der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1268/2012:

Anstatt:

„bei Verhandlungsverfahren (negotiated procedure) ohne vorherige Bekanntmachung, bei wettbewerblichen Verhandlungsverfahren oder wettbewerblichen Dialogen ...“

negotiated procedure

muss es heißen:

„bei Verhandlungsverfahren (negotiated procedure) ohne vorherige Bekanntmachung, bei Verhandlungsverfahren (competitive procedure with negotiation) oder wettbewerblichen Dialogen ...“

negotiated procedure

competitive procedure with negotiation

Seite 52, Artikel 1 Nummer 9 zur Änderung von Artikel 265 Absatz 3 Unterabsatz 2 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1268/2012:

Anstatt:

„In einem solchen Verhandlungsverfahren ...“

muss es heißen:

„Im wettbewerblichen Verhandlungsverfahren ...“

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

                   [Form of Renewal Notice for Subordinated
                        6, 12, 36 and 60 Month Notes]



The Thaxton Group                                                         [Date]
1524 Pageland Highway                                Note No.             [####]
Lancaster, SC  29720                                 Maturity Value       $
                                                     Maturity Date        [Date]
                                                     New Maturity Date    [Date]



We are please to advise you that your subordinated note listed above will renew
at ____% per annum IF YOU DO NOT REDEEM IT BY THE MATURITY DATE.  Please call us
at 1-888-THAXTON if you wish to redeem your note, if you would like to receive a
copy of the prospectus or if you have any questions.

Thank you.

                  [Name of holder]
                  [Address of holder]
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 191 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work opportunity 

credit to small businesses which hire individuals who are members of 

the Ready Reserve or National Guard, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

work opportunity credit to small businesses which hire 

individuals who are members of the Ready Reserve or 

National Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire A Hero Act of 

5 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 191 IH

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO SMALL BUSI2 NESSES FOR HIRING MEMBERS OF READY 

3 RESERVE OR NATIONAL GUARD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

6 end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end 

7 of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding 

8 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(K) in the case of an eligible employer (as 

10 defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i)), an indi11 vidual who is a member of— 

12 ‘‘(i) the Ready Reserve (as described 

13 in section 10142 of title 10, United States 

14 Code), or 

15 ‘‘(ii) the National Guard (as defined 

16 in section 101(c)(1) of such title 10).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to wages paid or incurred 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act in tax21 able years ending after such date. 

22 (2) CURRENT EMPLOYEES COVERED BY CRED23 IT.—For purposes of applying section 51 of the In24 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals described 

25 in section 51(d)(1)(J) of such Code, as added by 

26 this section, who are employed by an eligible emVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:04 Jan 11, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H191.IH H191

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 191 IH

1 ployer (as defined in section 408(p)(2)(C)(i) of such 

2 Code) on the date of the enactment of this Act shall 

3 be treated as beginning work for such employer on 

4 such date. 

5 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY 

6 CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS HIRING QUALIFIED 

7 VETERANS AND MEMBERS OF READY RE8 SERVE AND NATIONAL GUARD. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(c)(4) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

11 than any individual described in subparagraph (B) or (K) 

12 of subsection (d)(1))’’ after ‘‘individual’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

15 the employer after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Kinley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 27, 2010

/s/ Michael Kinley



Name: Michael Kinley
Title:   Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. and will be retained by International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0010

SAT Date: 10/12/2012

Print Date: 3/8/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: Dropped at CRSS

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

IRR-E,S,L,MM

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0010

FATE: Estimations for typical 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol diether MW 270 C16H30O3

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.9 (E) 

S = 34 mg/L at 25 C (E)
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (NOMO5)

BP = 411 C (NOMO5) based on 262C @ 10 mm Hg (M)

BP = Dec. 444 C (M)

H = 1.18E-8 (E)

log Koc = 1.95 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.24 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.26 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 25-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is moderate all routes, based on analogs. 

Some portion of the PMN substance will undergo ester hydrolysis. There is concern for 

irritation to all exposed tissues, based on analogs.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.8

daphnid 48-h LC50 6.6

green algal 96-h EC50 2.1

fish _ chronic value 0.20

daphnid _ chronic 

value

2.7

algal _ chronic 

value

0.95

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for esters; SAR chemical class = 

ester; MW 317; log Kow = 3.72 (EPI, ester component) liquid with mp unknown (M); S = 48.7 

mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal 

concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

20

SARs esters

SAR Class ester
Ecotox Category Esters

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of Regional  Bankshares,  Inc. hereby  certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge,  the accompanying Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2004,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in the report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.

March 24, 2005

                                 s/Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.
                                 Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial
                                 Officer
----

Action brought on 28 June 2004 by Spa Monopole, Compagnie fermière de Spa against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-268/04)

(2004/C 217/66)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 June 2004 by Spa Monopole, Compagnie fermière de Spa, Spa (Belgium), represented by Emmanuel Cornu, Eric De Gryse and Donatienne Moreau, lawyers.

Cottee Dairy Products Pty Limited, was also a party to the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, p. 1)

----
# C_2004239EN.01002701.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/27

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-14/00 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/58)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 4 May 2004 the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-14/00, C.A.V. Ulestraten-Schimmert-Hulsberg and Others, supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 13.5.2000.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Prevention Insurance.com (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott Goldsmith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

      The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.


Dated: July 27, 2005                    Name:  /s/ Scott Goldsmith
-----------------------                 ------------------------------
                                        Scott Goldsmith
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer