alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q/A
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                       479
<INVENTORY>                                     12,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,684
<PP&E>                                          49,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,965
<SALES>                                         43,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,695
<CGS>                                           29,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    42
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PAINCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PainCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randy Lubinsky, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark Szporka, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

/s/ Randy LubinskyRandy Lubinsky, Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 9, 2006/s/ Mark SzporkaMark Szporka, Chief Financial andAccounting OfficerDate: November 9, 2006


---
OMB Control No.2060-0586

Energy Use Authorization Form

Id #

I hereby give permission to the electric, natural gas, fuel oil, and propane (bottled 

gas including LPG) company or companies that provide energy to me to provide 

information to the designated agent of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

for confidential use in connection with their evaluation of energy savings 

achieved through the Home Performance with ENERGY STAR program.

This authorization covers the following data for a period 13 months before and 13

months after energy efficiency improvement were completed on my home:

1) the total amount of fuels used by my household

2) the total price charged for fuels used by my household

Companies are authorized to provide this information by monthly periods or by 

delivery date, whichever applies. An electronic copy of this authorization may be 

accepted with the same authority as the original.

Printed Name: __________________________________________________

Signature : ________________________________ Date: _______________

Utility/Fuel Suppler Name Account Number

EPA Form 5900-184

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 0.05 hours and welcomes suggestions for reducing this effort. Send comments (referencing OMB Control Number) to the 

Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Onas Jamal v. Woodbridge Crossing

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 726

- CV

Trial court case number: 1081258

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Higley , and Massengale

Date: December 4 , 2018
Home About us Products Installations Downloads News FAQ Contact Us

Terms and Conditions | Site Map | Contact Web Design Kent 

### MultiCyclone for Cooling **Towers**

**More Information**
**Overview Images** 



### Back **MultiCyclone for Cooling Towers**

The MultiCyclone is a brilliant new centrifugal fil tration device that is capable of saving water and reducing filter maintenance. The MultiCyclone w orks on the basis of centrifugal water filtration. There are no moving parts to wear and t ear, and no filter media to clean or replace. Incoming water simply enters 16 hydro cyclones tang entially, generating a strong centrifugal effect. Sediment is simply spun out to the hydro cy clone’s wall, and then spirals down to the sediment chamber. The filtered water migrates towar ds the center of the hydro cyclone where the flow reverses and spirals upwards through the o utlet. Accumulation of sediment can be visibly monitored through the MultiCyclone’s clear sediment chamber and is easily cleaned by opening the purge valve. Only 15 litres of water is discharged to cleanse the MultiCyclone! MultiCyclones are installed prior to a filter syste m to minimize filter maintenance and water usage or installed as a standalone filter capable o f filtering down to 30 to 40 microns. Due to the nature of cooling tower operation the mu ticyclone is a natural addition for both new and existing installations. Unintended quantities o f dirt, dust and other airborne debris are washed into the cooling system water. Generally coo ling towers and recirculation loops are dirty, warm, aerated and bio-nutrient rich, therefo re they are also perfect incubators for microorganism, algae and fungi development. Accumul ated dirt in the cooling tower basin provides an excellent breeding ground for algae and bacteria (i.e.; Legionella), plus dirt provides a layer under which bacteria can be protected from biocide treatments. Dirty water absorbs treatment chemicals and makes it difficult to maint ain proper residuals. A filtration system is capable of removing suspended debris from the circu lating water, which can reduce chemical consumption in two ways: • A decrease in total chemical treatment due to red uced blowdown and treatment make-up water • A reduction in algaecide/biocide requirements. The attached images show a typical installation of a bank of  multicylcones installed on a cooling tower at a manufacturing plant that is used in conj unction with a number of injection moulding machines. As can be seen from the images the multic yclones removed a great deal of debris. Page 1 of 2 Waterco Europe

- Installations > Water Treatment Installations

8/11/2011 http://www.waterco.eu/installations/water

- treatment

- installations?ptitle=multicyclone

- for

- cooling

- towers_39Page 2 of 2 Waterco Europe

- Installations > Water Treatment Installations

8/11/2011 http://www.waterco.eu/installations/water

- treatment

- installations?ptitle=multicyclone

- for

- cooling

- towers_39
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Solely for the purposes ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the Director of Finance of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

•                          the Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                          the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  November 12, 2003

 

 
| /s/  Susan J. Fite |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Susan J.  Fite          |
|                    |
| Director of  Finance    |

 

1

----
# Grasses

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Plants 
-  Grasses 

This is the placeholder for the Grasses page

## On This Page

            - Related News and Events

This is the placeholder for the Grasses page

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.  

## Related News and Events

Press ReleaseNRCS Announces Second EQIP & RCPP Signup for 2024 FundingApril 16, 2024

NewsUSDA Seeks Partnerships to Expand Conservation on Grazing Lands  March 27, 2024

Success StoryRestoring a Savannah Landscape in a Suburban Rural NeighborhoodMarch 13, 2024

          -  View More News 
          -  View More Events
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Electric Raceway Fire Barrier Systems in U.S. Nuclear Power Plants — Final Report (NUREG-1924)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1924 (PDF - 25.4 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2010**Date Published:** May 2010

**Prepared by:** G. Taylor and M.H. Salley 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In response to the 1975 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant fire, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Appendix R to Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* Part 50. To support fire protection defense-in-depth 1- or 3-hour electric raceway fire barrier systems (ERFBS) were permitted for use as an acceptable method to protect electrical cables essential to fire protection safe shutdown capability. However, ERFBS were a new approach to fire barrier applications and as the initial installation of the ERFBS began, there was uncertaint regarding the ERFBS performance and definitive test standards for ERFBS qualification. Following review and research efforts, NRC resolved many concerns with ERFBS, including the fire resistance, ampacity derating, and seismic position retention. This report documents the history of various ERFBS and how U.S. commercial nuclear power plants use ERFBS for compliance. This report also documents the current state of the use of ERFBS and evaluates the effectiveness of these barriers in achieving adequate protection for nuclear power plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Cornel C. Spiegler, certify that:


         1.       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Impax
                  Laboratories, Inc.; and


         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
                  statement of material fact, or omit to state a material fact
                  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
                  circumstances under which such statements were made, not
                  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





May 26, 2004                                        /s/ Cornel C. Spiegler
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Cornel C. Spiegler
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffAgency Financial Report (NUREG-2220)

# Fiscal Year 2022 – Agency Financial Report (NUREG-2220, Volume 6)

        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2220, Volume 6 (PDF – 4.21 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** November 2022

Division of the ComptrollerOffice of the Chief Financial OfficerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Fiscal Year 2022 Agency Financial Report (AFR) presents the agency's financial results of operations which includes the audited annual financial statements of the NRC. The AFR also provides a summary of NRC program performance and cost. The information is presented in accordance with applicable statutes and OMB requirements in OMB Circular A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 15, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                  8,645
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          47,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                            3,312
<INVENTORY>                                            51,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      137,310
<PP&E>                                                 27,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                         13,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        261,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  65,110
<BONDS>                                                   168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  341
<OTHER-SE>                                            194,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          261,901
<SALES>                                                43,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       43,860
<CGS>                                                  34,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          34,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          259
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (9,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (3,076)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (6,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (6,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.22)


</TABLE>
o 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Memorandum 

Subject: ACTION: Docket OST-2011-0159: Exemption 

from the Tariff Filing Requirements 

Date: October 14, 2011 

From: 

To: 

Paul L. Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation, X-40 

Renee Wright 

Program Manager, Dockets Management 

Reply to Delia E. Davis 

Attn, of: ^202) 366-2432 

Please issue and close. 

Attachment 

C J 

Z'O -v ^ -''—, 

O -^> '"n 

uo 
e 

U L & Departmen t o f - IQ^Of) lAJlO' ^ 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

TVamportation .-.; •• T OFl^R •\l'!G"-^i3^^^'''S'^"' ^ ^0590 

Off ice of the Secrelory 

of Transportation . _ . r,. i o 

October 14, 2011 

Mr. MoffettB. Roller 

Roller & Bauer, PLLC 

Washington Dulles International Airport 

45005 Aviation Drive 

Suite 200 

Dulles, VA 20166 

Dear Mr. Roller: 

This letter confirms the October 13, 2011 oral approval of your application for a 30-day 

exemption from provisions of 49 U.S.C. 41504 and Part 221 of the Department's Regulations, to 

the extent necessary to permit ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Interjet, to advertise and sell 

air transportation on its authorized service between Mexico and the United States without benefit 

of a filed tariff. By Order 2008-10-30, effective October 29, 2008, the Department granted 

Interjet a foreign air carrier permit that authorized Interjet to operate scheduled service between 

Toluca, Mexico, and San Antonio, Texas; and by Notice of Action Taken on August 31, 2011, 

the Department granted Interjet an exemption to engage in scheduled foreign services between 

Mexico City, Mexico, on the one hand and San Antonia, Texas; New York, New York; and 

Miami, Florida, on the other hand in Docket OST-2011-0159. 

Interjet has indicated that they are currently workuig with the Airline Tariff Publishing Company 

to prepare Interjet's general rules and fares tariff, and hopes that the tariff can be filed and 

approved within 30 days. 

We find the reasons stated in your application generally conform with the criteria we have 

previously found necessary to approve this type of authorization, and that approval is consistent 

with the public interest. We will grant exemption from the tariff filing requirement through 

November 13,2011, or until such time as tariffs are approved by the Department, whichever 

occurs first. 

This action is taken under authority duly assigned by the Department's Regulation, 

14 CFR 385.13. Persons entitled to petition for review of this action under the Department's 

Regulations, 14 CFR 385.30, may file a petition withui seven days after the date of this letter. 
This action is effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not alter its 

effectiveness. 

Sincerely, 

^y^^Pau l L. Gretch 

y' Durector 

Office of International Aviation
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Fuel Qualification for Advanced Reactors, Final (NUREG-2246)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2246 (PDF – 17.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2022**Date Published: **March 2022**Prepared by:**T. DrzewieckiJ. SchmidtC. Van WertP. CliffordJordan Hoellman, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Proposed advanced reactor technologies use fuel designs and operating environments (e.g., neutron energy spectra, fuel temperatures, neighboring materials) that are significantly different from light water reactors for which existing fuel assessment guidance was developed. As such, the purpose of this report is to identify criteria that will be useful for advanced reactor designers through an assessment framework that would support regulatory findings associated with nuclear fuel qualification. The report examines the regulatory basis and related guidance applicable to fuel qualification, noting that the role of nuclear fuel in the protection against the release of radioactivity for a nuclear reactor depends heavily on the reactor design. The report considers the use of accelerated fuel qualification techniques and lead test specimen programs that may shorten the timeline for qualifying fuel for use in a nuclear reactor at the desired parameters (e.g., burnup). The assessment framework particularly emphasizes the identification of key fuel manufacturing parameters, the specification of a fuel performance envelope to inform testing requirements, the use of evaluation models in the fuel qualification process, and the assessment of the experimental data used to develop and validate evaluation models and empirical safety criteria.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 07, 2022
#### Robert Cannon *v.*A. W. Beemer, *et al.*

The exercise of a discretionary ¡power, in the superior court, cannot be examined upon an appeal.

This was an action of Debt, tried on the last Spring Circuit at Wake, where the plaintiff obtained a verdict, which was set aside, upon the payment of the costs of the term. Directly after the rule was made absolute, one of the defendants applied to the clerk, and paid him his costs ; during the term, several witnesses, who were examined on the trial, proved and filed their tickets— The defendant who paid the cost, made no enquiry of the clerk, as to the costs of the *witnesses-;*neither did the clerk give him any information relative to them,— No notice of the tickets being filed was given, to any of the defendants ; and in no way, except by inference, did it appear that they knew the tickets would be filed.— Upon these facts, the plaintiff on the last circuit, moved for judgment upon the verdict, .insisting that the condition upon which the new tidal h .(! been, granted, had not been performed. The defendant resisted the motion, and paid the costs of the witnesses into the office.

His Honor, Judge Norwood, directed judgment to b.e. entered upon the verdict, and the defendants appealed.

*Manly*for the defendant.

*Badger*and *fV. H. Haywood,*for-the plaintiff.;

DaNiei, Judge.

We do not agree with the plaintiff’s counsel that the terms of the rule import that the costs should be paid at that time. Upon the second point, we think that the questions.,, whether the terms of the order had been complied with, or whether a new trial should be granted, were addressed solely to the discretion of the judge below. We are of opinion that he was too rigid with the defendant,' yet as he exercised a. discretionary power, we cannot disturb his judgment.

Ruffin, Judge.

The granting a new trial, and the terms of it, were altogether in the discretion of the Su* *364perior Court, where tlie rule was made $ and so also was the enlarging the rule, or the refusal to enlarge it, at the subsequent term. We should indeed in the case stated in the record, if that he all, have been disposed to enlarge the rule in this case ; hut I am not as capable of forming as correct an opinion, as the judge who presided and knew the value of the controversy, and all other circumstances ; and as it is a matter of discretion, his must determine the question and not ours — the judgment must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — Judgment aeeirmed.