alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 23, 2014

Via regulations.gov and Electronic Mail

Robert Finamore

Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Asiana Airlines, Inc. for

Blanket Statement of Authorization; Docket OST-2014-0225

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the air carrier representatives on the attached service list 

regarding the above-referenced Application and received no objection. Accordingly, we 

respectfully request expedited consideration of this Application.

Sincerely,

Brian D. Smith

Counsel to Asiana Airlines, Inc.

cc: Parties identified on the attached service list.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I caused one copy of the foregoing letter to be served via electronic mail on 

December 23, 2014, upon the following individuals:

American Airlines

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

FedEx

sharon.pasley@fedex.com 

sllunsford@fedex.com

United Airlines

dan.weiss@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.com 

Delta Airlines

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com 

Polar Air Cargo

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

peter.beckett@polaraircargo.com

United Parcel Service

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

Hawaiian Airlines

jhill@cooley.com

perkmann@cooley.com 

JetBlue

jhill@cooley.com 

perkmann@cooley.com 

Spirit Airlines

jyoung@yklaw.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

Alaska Airlines

marshall.sinick@squirepb.com 

charles.donley@squirepb.com

Allegiant

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com

jmaddux@ggh-airlaw.com 

Sun Country

thomas.ting@suncountry.com 
Amerijet

joan.canny@amerijet.com 

Kalitta Air

matwood@cozen.com 

Atlas Air

rpommer@atlasair.com

Etihad Airways

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

Federal Aviation Administration

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

Department of Transportation

robert.finamore@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

Department of State

cristinasa@state.gov

AirlineInfo

info@airlineinfo.com 

_____________________

Brian D. Smith
# L_2015301EN.01000501.xml

| 18.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2061

of 4 November 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Oberlausitzer Biokarpfen’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. — Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 212, 27.6.2015, p. 9.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7391

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTIN F. SALAZAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. 

(1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1)

Submitted: March 19, 2010 Decided: April 8, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin F. Salazar, Appellant Pro Se. Dean A. Eichelberger, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the denial of his motion for 

a new trial. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the 

notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).*

The district court entered its order on June 29, 2009. 

The ten-day appeal period expired on July 14. See Fed. R. App. 

P. 26(a)(2) (providing “intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and 

legal holidays” are excluded when time period is less than 

eleven days). The thirty-day excusable neglect period expired 

on August 13. On July 24, Salazar filed a document entitled 

“Motion to Appeal and Request for Extension to File Appeal.” He 

stated that he did not receive the court’s order until July 8, 

2009, and that legal services were not available. His 

certificate of service stated that he mailed his notice of 

appeal on July 22.

 With or without a motion, upon a 

showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court 

may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

 * Because Salazar’s notice of appeal was filed before the 

December 2009 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, we evaluate the timeliness of his appeal under the 

rules in effect when he filed his notice of appeal.
3

Thus, while Salazar’s notice of appeal was not filed 

within the ten-day appeal period, it was filed during the 

thirty-day extension period. In addition, in Salazar’s notice 

of appeal, he explicitly requested an extension of time. The 

district court did not rule on this motion.

Because Salazar filed his notice of appeal within the 

excusable neglect period and requested an extension of time, we 

remand the case to the district court for the court to determine 

whether Salazar has shown excusable neglect or good cause 

warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The 

record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for 

further consideration.

REMANDED
#### Alan M. MacEWAN and Mary *G.*MacEwan, Appellants, v. Dean RUSK, Secretary of State, Department of State, Washington, D. C. and Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, Washington, D. C.

No. 14920.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 18, 1964.

Decided May 12, 1965.

Leonard B. Boudin, New York City (Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, A. Harry Levitan, Levitan & Lurie, Philadelphia, Pa., Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

Robert L. Keuch, Dept, of Justice, Internal Security Division, Washington, D. C. (Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Eastern District of Pennsylvania, J. Walter Yeagley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kevin T. Maroney, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court, will be affirmed upon the excellent opinion of Judge Freedman, D.C., 228 F. Supp. 306, which is in line with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Zemel v. Rusk, Secretary of State et al., (1965), 85 S.Ct. 1271, opinion filed May 3,1965.
# IVA

# VA

# VB1

# VB2

# VB3

# VIA

# VIB

# VIC1

# VIC2

# VIC3

# VIC4

# VIC5

# VIIA

# VIIB

# VIIC

# VIID

# VIIE

# VIIIA

# VIIIB

# IX

# X

# XIIA

# XIIB

# XIIC

# XIID

# XIIE
**EXHIBIT 11.2**

 

**Duke Realty Limited Partnership**

**Ratio of Earnings To Fixed Charges**

**(In Thousands)**

 
|                                                                      |   | **Six Months  Ended June 30, 2003** |       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| Net income from continuing operations less  dividends on preferred equity |   | $                                   | 77,002     |   |
| Loss/(gain) on land and depreciated  property sales                       |   | (11,146                             | )          |
| Recurring principal amortization                                          |   | 4,654                               |       |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of  deferred financing fees)      |   | 65,417                              |       |
| Earnings before debt service                                              |   | $                                   | 135,927    |   |
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of  deferred financing fees)      |   | $                                   | 65,417     |   |
| Recurring principal amortization                                          |   | 4,654                               |       |
| Total debt service                                                        |   | $                                   | 70,071     |   |
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**                                    |   | **1.94**                            | ** ** |

 

----
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Critical Area Planting, Early Successional Habitat Development/Mgt., Forage Harvest Management, Forest Stand Improvement, Integrated Pest Management, Land Clearing, Nutrient Management, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Range Planting, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# C_2004204EN.01000101.xml

| 12.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 August 2004

(2004/C 204/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2233 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2000 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5416 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,57930 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,463 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6605 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4226 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 671 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240,0200 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,010 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 788 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7167 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6179 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5408 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8754 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0951 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 411,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5649 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2233

JPY

Japanese yen

135,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66900

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2000

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5416

ISK

Iceland króna

87,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,57930

CZK

Czech koruna

31,463

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6605

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4263

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4226

ROL

Romanian leu

40 671

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240,0200

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,010

TRL

Turkish lira

1 788 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7167

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6179

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5408

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8754

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0951

KRW

South Korean won

1 411,87

ZAR

South African rand

7,5649

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regional Bankshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 22, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                      |  | Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.           
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer        

|Date:  March 22, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                      |  | Curtis A. Tyner, Sr.           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5763-5764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Superfund Hazardous 
Research and Training Programs.
    Date: February 25-27, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel, One Europa Drive, Chapel 
Hill, NC 27514.
    Contact Person: Leroy Worth, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and 
Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 
12233, MD EC-30/Room 3171, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 
541-0670, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#10677f626478507e797578633e7e79783e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4938b96908ca48a8d818c97ca8a8d8cca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 5764]]


    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01988 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) (10/17) Standard Document(100.31 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) Overview(165.48 KB)

Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) CPPE(25.86 KB)

Waste Treatment Lagoon (No.) (359) Network Effects Diagram(63.6 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 14, 2020

No. 04-20-00007-CV

AKF GROUP LLC,

Appellant

v.

Keath GARRISON and Kassie Garrison, Individually and as Next Friend of Karrah Garrison 

and Maycie Garrison, Minors; Haela Garrison; Ernest D. Copelin, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of Roper T. Nathon Copelin, Deceased' and Tangela M. Copelin,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI00853

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellees’ briefs are due on February 18, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). Before the 

due date, Appellees filed opposed motions for a thirty-day extension of time to file Appellees’

briefs until March 19, 2020.

Appellees’ motions are GRANTED. Appellees’ briefs are due on March 19, 2020.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2023

# Recent FOIA Requests - September 2023

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during September 2023. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

1 FOIA-2023-000203 was a nonsensical request submitted through the National FOIA Portal. The anonymous requester did not provide any contact information, or a valid description of records. The request was deleted.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 4, 2023
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-2105EM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth Waller, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: December 15, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Kennet h Waller appeals his drug-related convictions. Waller contends th e district court improperly instructed the jury on constructive possession. Waller als o contends t he evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We conclude tha t an ex tended discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no usefu l purpose. We have carefully considered Waller's contentions and find them to b e without merit. We thus affirm Waller's convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.