alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cobalt . 2.03 0.000457387Copper 2390 0.538499716

Lead 7.73 0.001741675Mercury 1.7 0.000383033Nickel 93.1 0.020976704

Selenium 0.447 0.000100715Silver 148 0.033346426

Thallium 0.544 0.000122571Tin 279 0.062862519

Vanadium 9.6 0.002163011

Zinc 126 0.028389525

Cyanide (total) 0.245 . 5.52019E-05

Fluoride 722 0.162676483

Acetone 0.371 8.35914E-05

Benzene 0.0051 1.1491E-06Benzoic acid 4.57

U 0.001 029684

Benzo(b)fluranthene 0.388 8.7421 7E-05

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2.265 0.000510336

2-Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone) 0.0544 1.22571E-05

Carbon disulfide 0.0136 3.06427E-06Carbon tetrachloride 0.0202

U 4.55134E-06

Chloroform 0.0202

U 4.55134E-06

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.0202

U 4.55134E-06

1,1 -Dichloroethene 00202

U 4.551 34E-06

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 0.0136 3.06427E-06

Diethyl phthalate 4.57

U 0.001029684

Diphenylamine . 4.57

U 0.001029684

Fluoranthene 3.385 0.000762687

2-Hexanone 0.0253 5.70044E-06

1 -Methylnaphthalene 4.57

U 0.001029684

2-Methylnaphthalene 4.57

U 0.001029684

3-Methylphenol (m-cresol) 4.57

U 0.001029684

4-Nitroaniline 4.57

U 0.001029684

Total PCBs 0.23 5.18221E-05

Pyrene 0.535 0.000120543

2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0000035 7.88598E-1 0Tetrachloroethene 0.22 4. 9569E-05

1 1,1 -Trichloroethane 0.0202

U 4.55 1 34E-06

Trichloroethene 1.2 0.000270376Trichlorofluoromethane 0.0202

U 4.551 34E-06

1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.0232 5.22728E-06

rn-p-Xylenes 0.0202

U 4.551 34E-06
#### State ex rel. Schwenker, Appellant, vs. District Court of Milwaukee County and Page, District Judge, Respondents.

*December 11, 193*1

January *12, 1932.*

*610For the appellant there was a brief by *Gilbert, Ela, Heilman & Raeder*of Madison and *Miller, Mack & Fairchild*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Paid R. Newcomb*of Milwaukee and *Roman Heilman.*

For the respondents there was a brief by the *Attorney General, George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *Walter J. Hofer,*deputy district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Bowman*and *Mr. Hofer.*

Fairchild, J.

The petitioner is charged with a criminal violation of sec. 221.41 of the Wisconsin Statutes.

It is alleged that he, while commissioner of banking of the state of Wisconsin, failed, refused, and wilfully neglected to institute proceedings to secure a dissolution and winding up of the affairs of the Franklin State Bank, a Wisconsin corporation, for the reason that the directors, officers, agents, and employees of said bank continued to violate the provisions of ch. 221 of the Wisconsin Statutes after being warned by the said commissioner to discontinue such conduct.

This action is similar to and controlled by the decision in *State ex rel. Schwenker v. District Court of Milwaukee County,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 600, 240 N. W. 406). Here, as in that case, the criminal complaint, taking into consideration the plea in abatement filed by the defendant, shows conclusively that no offense was committed by the petitioner in Milwaukee county, and hence no offense charged.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed, and cause remanded with directions to grant the writ.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
Rogers Wireless Communications Inc. We consent to the use of our report
dated January 28, 2004, except as to Note 19, which is as of November 19,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rogers Wireless Communications Inc. as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,
deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended
December 31, 2003, incorporated in this annual report on Form 40-F by
reference. (KPMG LLP IMAGE) /s/ KPMG LLP  Toronto, Canada
November 19, 2004
012851/000097 

131 - 1760279v1 

NO. 03-15-00382-CV 

______________________________________________ 

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS 

______________________________________________ 

STEVEN B. ARMBRUSTER 

Appellant 

V. 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, 

Appellee 

______________________________________________ 

Appeal from the 277th District Court 

Williamson County, Texas 

______________________________________________ 

APPELLEES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEES' BRIEF 

______________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 Appellees Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Indenture 

Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2 and Juanita 

Strickland move this Court to grant an extension of time of four weeks, 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00382-CV

7064224

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/23/2015 3:44:20 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/23/2015 3:44:20 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2 

012851/000097 

131 - 1760279v1 

to and including November 19, 2015, to file their brief. In support 

thereof, Appellees respectfully show as follows: 

1. Appellant filed his brief on September 22, 2015. Therefore, 

Appellees’ brief is currently due October 22, 2015. 

2. Counsel for Appellees is preferentially set for trial on 

October 5, 2015 in the 172nd Judicial District Court of Jefferson County, 

Texas. That case is expected to last more than one week. Counsel is 

preparing for that trial. 

3. This is Appellees’ first request for an extension of time to file 

their brief. 

4. Counsel for Appellant is unopposed to this request. 

PRAYER 

Wherefore, Appellees ask the Court to grant an extension of time, 

to and including, November 19, 2015. 

 
3 

012851/000097 

131 - 1760279v1 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Peter C. Smart 

Peter C. Smart 

State Bar No. 00784989 

Crain, Caton & James, P.C. 

1401 McKinney St., Suite 1700 

Houston, Texas 77010 

(713) 658-2323 (Telephone) 

(713) 658-1921 (Facsimile) 

psmart@craincaton.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES

Certificate of Conference 

 I certify that my office conferred with Appellant and Appellant is unopposed 

to the request made herein. 

/s/ Peter C. Smart 

 Peter C. Smart 

Certificate of Service 

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on the 

following counsel of record through the electronic filing system and via regular 

mail this September 23, 2015: 

David Rogers 

Law Offices of David Rogers 

1201 Spyglass, Suite 100 

Austin, Texas 78746 

/s/ Peter C. Smart 

 Peter C. Smart
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 29, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          36,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,215
<INVENTORY>                                     41,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,099
<PP&E>                                          20,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,272
<BONDS>                                             85
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,595
<SALES>                                        113,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,557
<CGS>                                           70,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00493-CV

Bruce Lee BECKER,

Appellant

v.

Pedro BECKER and Manuela Becker,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CV-04644

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellant’s first amended motion to stay proceedings filed on December 18, 2017, is 

DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on December 29, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Probabilities of Failure and Uncertainty Estimate Information for Passive Components – A Literature Review (NUREG/CR-6936)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6936 (PDF - 4.23 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2007**Date Published:** May 2007

**Prepared by:**S.R. Gosselin (1), F.A. Simonen (1), S.P. Pilli (1)B.O.Y. Lydell (2)

(1) Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryP.O. Box 999Richland, WA 99352

(2) Sigma-Phase Inc.16917 Orchid Flower TrailVail, AZ 85641

S.N. Malik, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Fuel, Engineering and Radiological ResearchOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code N6019

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes a study performed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with subcontractor support from Sigma-Phase, Inc. The effort involved reviewing the open literature to collect estimates of failure probability and their associated uncertainties for passive reactor components. The review focused primarily on probabilistic structural mechanics evaluations of plant-specific components for domestic nuclear power plants with pressurized water reactors or boiling water reactors as well as for international plants of similar design.

A computerized search of several databases identified more than 7500 documents, of which only a small fraction were related to probabilistic structural mechanics calculations. Probabilistic treatments and characterizations of fatigue and stress corrosion cracking were found to be well represented in the literature, but only a limited number of the publications described plant-specific and component-specific probabilistic evaluations based on actual design or operating stresses. The NRC will apply these results during the development of probabilistic fracture mechanics tools to generate failure probabilities for passive reactor components for use in regulatory decision making.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0257

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM122AD

ALI AI/SE-M2/95A.1038/99, I02 --- 3/09

ALI AI/SE-M2/95A.1038/99, I01 --- 8/2/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Evaluating Igneous Activity at Yucca Mountain: Technical Basis for Decisionmaking (NUREG-1890)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1890 (PDF - 43.2 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2008**Date Published:**February 2008

**Prepared by:** W.J. Hinze1, B.D. Marsh2, R.F. Weiner1, N.M. Coleman1

2Johns Hopkins University 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218

1Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Eighty thousand years ago a small-volume basaltic volcano, the Lathrop Wells volcano, erupted about 20 kilometers south of the Department of Energy’s proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Lathrop Wells is one of a series of infrequent basaltic volcanoes that have occurred near the proposed repository site during the past 10 million years. This report presents the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials (ACNW&M) summary and analysis of the range of current technical views on the nature, likelihood, and potential consequences of future igneous activity at the proposed repository. This report responds to the request of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Staff Requirements Memorandum M06011B, February 9, 2006. The technical views have been abstracted from published literature and public agency reports and presentations. The alternative views reflect uncertainties of the igneous processes that have occurred in the region and those that are likely to occur in the future, as well as the interaction of these processes with the proposed repository. Analysis of the views and observations is based on professional judgment and quantitative considerations within the scope of the resources available to ACNW&M.

 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

This NUREG does not contain information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Public Protection Notification 

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2018075DE.01004101.xml

| 19.3.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 75/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 75/41

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1254/2014 der Kommission vom 11. Juli 2014 zur Ergänzung der Richtlinie 2010/30/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf die Kennzeichnung von Wohnraumlüftungsgeräten in Bezug auf den Energieverbrauch

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 337 vom 25. November 2014
  )

Seite 28, Artikel 1 Absatz 2 Buchstabe f:

Anstatt:

| „f) | Einstufung als Dunstabzugshaube im Sinne der delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 65/2014 der Kommission (4).“ |
| --- | --- |

„f)

muss es heißen:

| „f) | gemäß der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 65/2014 der Kommission (4) als Dunstabzugshauben eingestuft sind.“ |
| --- | --- |

„f)

Seite 43, Anhang VIII Nummer 1:

Anstatt:

| „— | tdefr
  der Dauer der Abbauperiode bei einer Außentemperatur unter – 4 °C [h/a] und“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

tdefr
  der Dauer der Abbauperiode bei einer Außentemperatur unter – 4 °C [h/a] und“

tdefr

muss es heißen:

| „— | tdefr
  der Dauer der Abtauperiode bei einer Außentemperatur unter – 4 °C [h/a] und“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

tdefr
  der Dauer der Abtauperiode bei einer Außentemperatur unter – 4 °C [h/a] und“.

tdefr

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)

# NRC Regulatory Guides - Antitrust and Financial Review (Division 9)

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 9, "Antitrust and Financial Review," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

## Antitrust and Financial Review (Division 9)

        - Guides 9.1 – 9.10

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Division 1 - Power Reactors
          - Division 2 Research and Test Reactors
          - Division 3 - Fuels and Materials Facilities
          - Division 4 - Environmental and Siting
          - Division 5 - Materials and Plant Protection
          - Division 6 - Products
          - Division 7 - Transportation
          - Division 8 - Occupational Health
          - Division 9 - Antitrust and Financial Review
          - Division 10 - General

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
# Histosols

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Histosols 

Histosols have a high content of organic matter and no permafrost. Most are saturated year round, but a few are freely drained. Histosols are commonly called bogs, moors, peats, or mucks.

The central concept of Histosols is that of soils that are dominantly organic. They are mostly soils that are commonly called bogs, moors, or peats and mucks.

A soil is classified as Histosols if it does not have permafrost and is dominated by organic soil materials.

## Dominant Suborders

### Fibrists

Fibrists are the wet, slightly decomposed Histosols. The largest extent is in southern Alaska. Most of the soils support natural vegetation of widely spaced, small trees, shrubs, forbs, and grasses and grass-like plants.

### Folists

Folists are the more or less freely drained Histosols that consist primarily of horizons derived from leaf litter, twigs, and branches resting on bedrock or on fragmental materials. The largest extent is in Hawaii and Alaska. Some Folists developed in the mountains and the most humid parts of the conterminous United States. Most of these soils support forest vegetation. Some of the soils in Hawaii mainly support grass. A few of the soils in Hawaii are used for specialty crops or for urban or recreational development.

### Hemists

Hemists are the wet Histosols in which the organic materials are moderately decomposed. The largest extent is in Minnesota and Alaska. Most Hemists support natural vegetation and are used as woodland, rangeland, or wildlife habitat. Some have been cleared and drained and are used as cropland.

### Saprists

Saprists are the wet Histosols in which the organic materials are well decomposed. The largest extent is in Michigan, Florida, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Alaska. Small areas are common on the Atlantic and gulf coasts. Many Saprists support natural vegetation and are used as woodland, rangeland, or wildlife habitat. Some of the soils, mostly those with a mesic or warmer temperature regime, have been cleared and drained and are used as cropland.

Histosols are forming in organic soil materials. The general rule is that a soil is classified as a Histosol if half or more of the upper 80 cm is organic.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Cohoat,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.
|        |   | /s/ Matthew A. Cohoat         |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |   | Matthew A. Cohoat                  |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer            |
|   |   |   of the General Partner |
|   |   | Date: August 13, 2007              |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retainedby Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (W Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        - Waste, Radioactive
        - High-Level Waste
        - Low-Level Waste
        - Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as Amended
        - Quick Links
        - Uranium Mill Tailings
        - Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR)  Disposal Process for WIR  Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)   West Valley Demonstration Project Act (WVDPA)   
        - Waste Disposal
        - High-Level (See  High-Level Waste )
        - Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste (10 CFR Part 61 )
        - Low-Level (See  Low-Level Waste )
        - Spent Fuel Storage (See  Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage )
        - Statistics, Low-Level
        - Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR), Disposal Process  Locations of Disposal Facilities for WIR  Monitoring of Disposal Actions for WIR  Regulations, Guidance, and Communications  Waste Determination Process for WIR   
        - Web Improvement Plan
        - Web Site Search
        - Webcast
        - Archives
        - Commission Meeting Webcast Information
        - Contact Us
        - Download Webcast Viewer
        - NRC Webcast Portal
        - What's New at Our Web Site
        - Withholding of Sensitive Information
        - Women-Owned Businesses
        - Workplace Information (see  Quality of Life )

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 27, 2021