alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6788-6789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14217 and #14218]


Disaster #CA-00229

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Soboba Band of Luiseno 
Indians (FEMA-4206-DR), dated 01/27/2015.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 12/04/2014 through 12/06/2014.

[[Page 6789]]

    Effective Date: 01/27/2015.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/30/2015.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/27/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/27/2015, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Area: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and Associated Lands
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14217B 
and for economic injury is 14218B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-02362 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Surviving Partners of Auley McNaughton and Co. *v.*William Norris, Surviving Partner, &c.

Assumpsit for goods, wares and merchandize sold and delivered. General issue and s'auu.e of limitations pleaded; and (he principal question of law was, whether the act of limitations runs from the date of each article in the account, or from the date of the last article only.

*Et*

*per*curiam,

the act runs from the date of the last article in (he account only, where the account has been running on from its first commencement *$*hut where it is once deserted or ended between the parties, (hen from that time. Verdict was found accordingly, and the Plaintiff had judgment.

Note.— *Vide Kimboll*v. *Person’s Adm's.*2 *Hay.*394. 2 *Sound. 127,*note 6 & *7.*
# C_2004141EN.01000201.xml

| 25.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2004

(2004/C 141/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1922 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,44 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6733 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0735 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5365 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,87 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2685 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9463 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5857 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,901 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4532 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6546 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4259 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6887 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 620 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,75 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,135 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 853 677 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7179 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6431 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,295 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9667 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,048 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1041 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1922

JPY

Japanese yen

134,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,44

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6733

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0735

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5365

ISK

Iceland króna

87,87

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2685

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9463

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5857

CZK

Czech koruna

31,901

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4532

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6546

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4259

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6887

ROL

Romanian leu

40 620

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,75

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,135

TRL

Turkish lira

1 853 677

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7179

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6431

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,295

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9667

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,048

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,01

ZAR

South African rand

8,1041

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1988

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
Order entered February 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00528-CR

TIMOTHY SIM SMITHERMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-50887-T

ORDER

The State’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief is 

GRANTED, and we ORDER the State’s brief filed on or before MARCH 15, 

2023.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3479 — INVESTCORP / APCOA)

(2004/C 174/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
Exhibit
23.1





January
9, 2009





El
Capitan Precious Metals, Inc.


Suite
276


1325
Airmotive Way


Reno, NV
89502





Gentlemen:




The
undersigned hereby consents to the reference to the undersigned in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Annual Report”), including without limitation
references in Item 2, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.




I also
confirm that I have read each of the references to me in the Annual Report and
concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Sincerely,/s/ Clyde SmithClyde
      Smith
# C_2004201EN.01001503.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/15

---

Removal from the register of Case C-258/03 (1)

(2004/C 201/32)

By order of 17 May 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-258/03: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 213, 6.9.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of US Wireless Online, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel P. Burke, Sr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Daniel P. Burke, Sr.

Daniel P. Burke, Sr.

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 28, 2004
# Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) (9/16) Standard Document(138.9 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) Overview(353.15 KB)

Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) CPPE(25.68 KB)

Residue and Tillage Management, Reduced Till (Ac.) (345) Network Diagram(190.55 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7391** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARTIN F. SALAZAR , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00123

- MBS

- 1 )

Submitted : March 19, 2010 Decided: April 8, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
Martin F. S alazar, Appellant Pro Se. Dean A. Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Martin F. Salazar appeals the denial of his motion fo r a new trial. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). *

The district court entered its order on June 29, 2009. The ten

- day appeal period expired on July 14. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2) (providing “intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays” are excluded when time period is less than eleven days). The thirty

- day excusable neglect period expired on August 13. On July 24, Salazar filed a document en titled “Motion to Appeal and Request for Extension to File Appeal.” He stated that he did not receive the court’s order until July 8, 2009, and that legal services were not available. His certificate of service stated that he mailed his notice of appeal on July 22
. With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court
may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

* Because Salazar’s notice of appeal was filed before the December 2009 Amendments to th e Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure , we evaluate the timeliness of his appeal under the rules in effect when he filed his notice of appeal.3 Thus, while Salazar’s notice of appeal was not filed within the ten

- day appeal period, it was filed during the thirty

- day extension period. In addition, in Salazar’s notice of appeal, he explicitly requested an extension of time. The distr ict court did not rule on this motion. Because Salazar filed his notice of appeal within the excusable neglect period and requested an extension of time, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Salazar has shown excusa ble neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten

- day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
HomeRadioactive WasteLow-Level Waste DisposalLow-Level Waste Disposal Regulations, Guidance, and Communications

# Low-Level Waste Reference Documents

In October 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of NRC's oversight of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal program.  Specifically, the objective of the audit was review NRC's oversight of the disposal and waste blending processes at disposal facilities and if they are done safely and effectively.  The report found that the NRC provides adequate oversight of LLRW disposal and blending processes through inspection activities.  However, it noted that although LLRW guidance is adequate, some stakeholders have had difficulty finding NRC's LLRW guidance and there are numerous guidance documents stored on various websites.

This effort helps to ensure that the many staff positions on LLRW issues are readily available to licensees, States, future developers of LLRW disposal sites, and other stakeholders. 

The NRC staff has consolidated the LLRW guidance documents on the NRC Website.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 11, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Low-Level Waste Reference Documents
          - Extended Storage of LLRW - Reference Material

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 11, 2024
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Code

376) 

Adjusting field operations and technologies to reduce

emissions of particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen

from field operations. 

Practice Information 

This practice is used to reduce particulate emissions,

especially the PM-10 and smaller-sized particles during

field operations. This practice is applicable only on cropland. 

Particulate emissions reduction may be achieved by reducing the number of tillage passes, using

GPS guidance to avoid tillage overlap, using dust-reduction technologies on tillage and harvesting

equipment, maintaining more crop residue on the soil surface, timing field operations under more

moist soil conditions and crop conditions, using dust-mitigation technologies on-field equipment, and

by field irrigation to maintain more soil moisture. 

Conservation benefits may include but are not limited to improving air quality and visual aesthetics. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Code 376) is

commonly applied with CPSs such as Conservation Crop Rotation (Code 328), Cover Crop (Code

340), Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till (Code 329), Residue and Tillage Management,

Reduced Till (Code 345), and Irrigation Water Management (Code 449). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Exhibit 15
----------


The Partners
Duke Realty Limited Partnership:




Gentlemen:

RE:  Registration Statement No. 33-61361, 333-04695, and 333-26845

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statement,  we
acknowledge  our awareness of the use therein of  our  report
dated  May 5, 1997 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act  of  1933,
such  report  is  not  considered a part  of  a  registration
statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning  of
sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
May 12, 1997
# C_2004140EN.01000601.xml

| 20.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/6

---

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

MEMBERS OF THE SELECTION BOARD

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/B/2/03

OPEN COMPETITION

(2004/C 140/06)

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS (B5/B4) IN THE FIELDS OF PRODUCTION COORDINATION AND PROOF–READING

| Chairman: | John YOUNG |
| --- | --- |
| Full members: | Liam EGAN |
| Linda FORDE |
| William GOSLING |
| Carol RICCALTON |

Chairman:

John YOUNG

Full members:

Liam EGAN

Linda FORDE

William GOSLING

Carol RICCALTON

---
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Solely for the purposes ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the Director of Finance of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

•                                                                  theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                                                                  theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 13, 2002 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           |
| /s/                            | David A.  Swoish |   |
| David A.  Swoish               |
|                           |
| Director of  Finance           |

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.5


                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, MiniMed Inc. (the "Company") and Kevin R. Sayer (the "Executive") have
entered into that certain Change of Control Agreement dated March 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires pursuant to its terms on March 1, 2001; and

WHEREAS, the Company considers it essential and in the best interest of its
stockholders to continue to foster the continuous employment of key management
personnel and to continue to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and
dedication of the Executive to his assigned duties without distraction in the
face of potentially disturbing circumstances arising from the possibility of a
change in control of the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


1.   The preamble to Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety
     and replaced with the following:

     "1.  Payment of Severance Benefits Upon Change of Control. In the event of
          a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in Section 3) during
          the two-year period starting March 1, 2001, the Executive shall be
          entitled to the benefits set forth in Section 2 (the "Severance
          Benefits"), but only if:"

2.   All other terms and conditions in the Agreement, including but not limited
     to the remaining provisions of Section 1, shall remain unchanged and in
     full force and effect.

3.   This Amendment shall be effective as of March 1, 2001.

4.   This Amendment may be executed in two counterparts each of which shall be
     deemed an original but both of which together shall constitute one and the
     same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both the Executive and the Company have caused this
amendment to be executed by himself or by its duly authorized representatives,
respectively:

         MINIMED INC.

     By: /s/ Terrance H. Gregg             By: /s/ Kevin R. Sayer
         ----------------------                ---------------------
                                               Kevin R. Sayer

     Its: President & COO
         ----------------------