alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Brush Management, Clearing & Snagging, Conservation Cover, Contour Buffer Strips, Contour Orchard and Other Perennial Crops, Critical Area Planting, Grassed Waterway, Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land, Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment, Lined Waterway or Outlet, Vegetative Barrier.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
#### Great Northern Life Insurance Company, Respondent, vs. Petersen, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Gorman, Boileau ■& Park*of Wausau, attorneys, and *Lowell T. Thronson*and *Norris E. Maloney,*both of Madison, of counsel.

For the respondent: *Genrich & Genrich,*attorneys, and *Miles Lambert*of counsel, all of Wausau.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590).

## State-Specific Standard Document

              - State-specific conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590). 

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590) (5/19) Standard Document (157.69 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590) Overview(384.09 KB)

Nutrient Management (Ac.) (590) CPPE(25.96 KB)

Precision Agriculture: NRCS Support for Emerging Technologies(187.21 KB)

Precision Nutrient Management Planning(557.66 KB)

## Getting Assistance

              -  Technical Service Providers 

## Conservation at Work: Nutrient Management

This video explores how Guy Choiniere in Highgate Center, VT, is using this practice to create a dry manure system to feed the soil on his certified organic farm.

##   Additional Information

### Technical Service Providers

Technical service providers (TSPs) work on behalf of the customer to offer planning, design, and implementation services that meets NRCS criteria.  This assistance helps improve the producer's operation and addresses resource concerns on their land. 
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vsource, Inc. (the registrant) for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Phillip E. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 13, 2004



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Phillip E. Kelly         
|    |  | Phillip E. Kelly             
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



This certification accompanies this
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Solely for the purposes of complying with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:**

 

•      the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•      the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  February 12, 2004   |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Jacob Inbar                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                          |
|                                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP–76,871

EX PARTE RAUL PARRA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20060D03360 IN THE 409TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

MEYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

Code of Criminal Procedure Article 36.27 provides that when the trial court

receives a note from the jury, he should first submit the question and his answer to the

defendant or his counsel before giving the answer to the jury. Here, the trial judge

received a note that two of the jurors were threatening to walk out of the deliberations and

they wanted to know the consequences of doing so. The judge gathered the jury, the

defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecutor in the courtroom and informed them that
Parra dissent–Page 2

any jurors who walked out on deliberations would be put in the county jail and returned to

the jury the next day to continue to deliberate. Applicant’s counsel did not object to the

trial court’s failure to comply with Article 36.27 and did not object to the judge’s

instruction to the jury. The jury decided to continue deliberating and, within less than 30

minutes, returned a verdict assessing a life sentence.

The judge’s actions in threatening to put jurors in jail and in failing to inform

counsel that this would be his response to the jury’s questions were error and there is no

reasonable strategy to explain counsel’s failure to object to these errors. The deficiencies

in counsel’s performance deprived Applicant of a fair and impartial jury and likely

affected the judgment against him. I would hold that Applicant received ineffective

assistance of counsel and would grant relief.

Filed: September 18, 2013

Publish
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors Consent

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Accenture Ltd:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-104628) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-65376) on Form S-8 of Accenture Ltd of our
report dated October 9, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Accenture Ltd as of August 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the August 31, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K of Accenture Ltd.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
November 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 11.2**

 

**DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS(in thousands)**

 
|                                                                                                          |   | **Three  Months  Ended March 31, 2004** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                          |   |                                    |   |
| Net income from continuing operations, less  preferred dividends                                              |   | $                                       | 35,932 |   |
| Earnings from sale of land and ownership  interests in unconsolidated companies, net of impairment adjustment |   | (4,629                                  | )      |
| Recurring principal amortization                                                                              |   | 1,707                                   |   |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of  deferred financing fees)                                          |   | 32,155                                  |   |
| Earnings before debt service                                                                                  |   | $                                       | 65,165 |   |
|                                                                                                          |   |                                    |   |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of  deferred financing fees)                                          |   | $                                       | 32,155 |   |
| Recurring principal amortization                                                                              |   | 1,707                                   |   |
| Total debt service                                                                                            |   | $                                       | 33,862 |   |
|                                                                                                          |   |                                    |   |
| **Ratio of earnings to debt service**                                                                         |   | **1.92**                                |   |

 

----
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2015

Contour Orchard and Other

Perennial Crops (331)

Start

D.2 (+) 

Equipment 

C.1 (+) Quality 

of receiving 

waters

C.3 (+) Air 

quality

I.17 (+) Recreational 

opportunities

Initial setting: Sloping cropland where orchards, 

vineyards, or other perennial crops are grown 

and soil and water losses need to be controlled 

to minimize sheet and rill erosion.

I.11 (-) Waterborne 

contaminants

I.5 (+) Crop

productivity

Nutrient Management (590)

C.4 (+) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

communities) 

I.16 (+) Upland wildlife

I.14 (+) Biofiltration

Pest Management (595)

I.15 (+) Wildlife 

food and cover 

I.4 (+) Soil 

quality

I.6 (+) Potential

income

1. Creation of benches, ridges, or 

terrace and modification of row 

direction and row grade

2. Establishment of 

woody biomass of 

desired species 

D.6 (+) Canopy cover and 

vertical vegetative 

structure 

I.2 (+/-) Net

return to 

producer

C.2 (+) Fishable 

and swimmable 

waters

I.3 (-) Sheet and 

rill and ephemeral 

gully erosion

 I.1 (-) 

Labor,

following 

installation 

(long-term)

D.1 (+) Cost of 

installation and 

maintenance; 

time and skill 

required by 

producer 

(short-term)

D.3 (-) Runoff 

velocity

D.4. (+) Water 

infiltration 

D.5 (+) Carbon 

stored in 

vegetation

I.7 (-) 

Sedimentborne 

contaminants

I.10 (-) Runoff 

volume

I.12 (+) Water-borne

contaminants to 

groundwater

I.13 (-) Greenhouse gases

I.8 (-) 

Sedimentation

I.9 (+) Aquatic 

habitats

LEGEND

#. Created by 

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Paul W. Mikus and John V. Cracchiolo hereby certify that:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Endocare, Inc.

2. The Form 10-Q report of Endocare, Inc. that this certification accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

3. The information contained in the Form 10-Q report of Endocare, Inc. that this
certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Endocare, Inc.

Dated: August 14, 2002

                        By: /s/ Paul W. Mikus
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Paul W. Mikus
                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                        By: /s/ John V. Cracchiolo
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            John V. Cracchiolo
                            Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Philip
M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
AltiGen Communications, Inc.
  ****Date: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Philip M.
    McDermottPhilip M. McDermottChief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aavid
Thermal Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Brian A. Byrne, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: May 7, 2004                                  /s/ Brian A. Byrne
                                                        ---------------------
                                                    Brian A. Byrne
                                                    Vice President
                                                    and Chief Financial
                                                    Officer

                                       28
# Popular Conservation Program Extended Until April 26

CaliforniaAirAnimalsClimateEnergyLandPlantsSoilWaterConservation Stewardship Program

March 22, 2024

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News 
-  Popular Conservation Program Extended Until April 26 

In an effort to give additional farmers and ranchers an opportunity to apply for historic Inflation Reduction Act funding, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in California has extended the popular NRCS Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) until **April 26, 2024**.

DAVIS, Calif., March 22, 2024 – In an effort to give additional farmers and ranchers an opportunitytoapplyforhistoricInflationReductionActfunding,theUSDANaturalResources Conservation Service (NRCS) in California has extended the popular NRCS ConservationStewardship Program(CSP) until **April 26, 2024**.

“This additional month is intended to give even more farmers and ranchers in California an opportunitytoapplyfornearly$20millioninavailablefundingforCSPthisFiscalYear,”said NRCS California State Conservationist Carlos Suarez. “CSP helps producers address their unique resource concerns and supports them to achieve their stewardship goals through this popular program."

CSP provides producers payments for actively managing, maintaining, and expanding conservation activities integrated within their agricultural operations. CSP enhancements like covercrops,ecologically-basedpestmanagement,andbufferstripshelpproducersimprovesoil health while protecting water quality. Other CSP activities help sustain and increase pollinator and beneficial insect habitat in harmony with agriculture production on their land.

Technical Assistance

NRCS offers conservation technical assistance at no cost to give producers personalized advice andinformation,basedonthelatestscienceandresearch,tohelpthemmakeinformeddecisions. If a producer chooses to take the next step towards improving their operations, NRCS staff can work with them to develop a free, personalized conservation plan, with conservation practices that can help them reach their agricultural production and conservation goals.

The voluntary conservation plan defines and explains existing resources in a simple, easy to understand manner. Typically, the plan will include land use maps, soils information, inventory of resources, engineering notes, and other supporting information. One benefit to landowners whoworkwithanNRCSprofessionalconservationisttodevelopaplanisanincreasedpotential for participating in financial assistance programs and is a good first step in the overall process.

HistoricallyUnderservedProducer Benefits

Specialprovisionsarealsoavailableforhistorically underserved producers.NRCSsetsasidea portion of CSP funds for these historically underserved producers.

NRCShasprovidedleadershipinapartnershipefforttohelpAmerica'sprivatelandownersand managers conserve their soil, water, and other natural resources since 1935.

-NRCS-
#### Myra Vaughn, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[772 NYS2d 514]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 14, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by a street defect, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant contractor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant-respondent City’s evidence shows that it issued appellant three permits to work in the vicinity of the accident site, only two of which are addressed by appellant. Thus, issues of fact exist as to, inter alia, whether a third permit was issued, and, if so, the location of any work performed pursuant thereto. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      AltiGen Communications, Inc.








Date:
                May 11, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Gilbert HuName:
            Gilbert
                HuTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer