alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Bharatan R. Patel, Chairman, President, and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 12, 2004                     /s/ Bharatan R. Patel
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Bharatan R. Patel
                                             Chairman, President and Chief
                                             Executive Officer







                                       24
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2(NUREG-1960)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00151

- CR

IN RE : JOSEPH D. SMITH

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph D. Smith has filed a pro s e petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to

order Carolyn Parrott, the District C lerk of Upshur County, to file his “ Writ of Nunc Pro Tunc. ” 1

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over district clerks except when

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (West 2004); In re

Coronado , 980 S.W.2d 691, 692

– 93 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (per

curiam) (for district clerk to fall within jurisdictional reach of court of appeals, must establish

that mandamus is necessary to enforce court of appeals ’ jurisdiction). Smith has not allege d

facts sufficient for the district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach.

For the reasons stated, we deny Smith ’ s petition for writ of mandamus.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: August 28 , 2014

Date Decided: August 29 , 2014

Do Not Publish

1 The petition for writ of mandamus also names Lauren Parish, the 115th Judicial District Court Judge, and Billy W.

Byrd, the Upshur County District Attorney, as respondents. The petition seeks relief only again st Parrott.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29325]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, November 16, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 8, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-29325 Filed 11-8-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) Version 8 (NUREG/CR-7039)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7432

JAMES EDMOND WATTS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. METZGER, III; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD;

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-946-R)

Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edmond Watts, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Watts v. Metzger, No. CA-96-946-R (W.D. Va.

Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy 

Descriptions and distribution maps of the twelve soil orders.

##   Posters

12 Orders of Soil Taxonomy High-Resolution Poster(16.98 MB)

Soil Orders Map(7.34 MB)

##   The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy

        Alfisols    

###                     Alfisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Andisols    

###                     Andisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Aridisols    

###                     Aridisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Entisols    

###                     Entisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Gelisols    

###                     Gelisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Histosols    

###                     Histosols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Inceptisols    

###                     Inceptisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Mollisols    

###                     Mollisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Oxisols    

###                     Oxisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Spodosols    

###                     Spodosols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Ultisols    

###                     Ultisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

        Vertisols    

###                     Vertisols                

Photo, suborders, and distribution map.

##   Contact Soils

Please contact us if you see something that needs to be updated, if you have any questions, or if you need accessibility assistance.
                  -    Soils Webmaster 
                  -    402-437-5499 
                  -    Soils-Webmaster@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
# Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) (10/2020) Standard Document(76.26 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) Overview(271.25 KB)

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) CPPE(24.82 KB)

Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Ft.) (580) Network Effects Diagram(100.71 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

May 8, 2001


Frank DiPietro
Sipex Corporation
22 Linell Circle
Billerica, MA  01821

Dear Frank:

Comerica Bank-California (herein "Bank") hereby gives formal notice to Sipex
Corporation (herein "Borrower") that as of March 31, 2001 it is in violation of
the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan & Security Agreement between
Comerica Bank and Sipex Corporation dated March 22, 2001 (Agreement) as of March
31, 2001:

         7.17(g) "Net Income after taxes of ($1,500,000) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001..."

Subject to the terms and conditions that follow, we have decided to waive our
default right with respect to the violation for the period ending on March 31,
2001. Please note that this applies only to the specific instance described
above. It is not a waiver of any subsequent violation of the same provision of
the Agreement, nor is it a waive of any violation of any other provision of the
Agreement.

Except as expressly stated in this letter, we reserve all of the rights, powers,
and remedies available to us under the Agreement and any other contracts or
instruments signed by you. If you have any questions regarding this letter,
please contact me.

Sincerely,



/s/ Marco Figone
Vice President

(415) 905-2026
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject - FY 2007

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06560]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2013-0113]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Long Term Loan or Guarantee (EIB 95-
10).

SUMMARY: Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank is requesting an emergency approval 
for form EIB 95-10 Application for Long Term Loan or Guarantee, OMB 
3048-0013, because the Export Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2012 
has placed additional reporting requirements on the Bank.
    By neutralizing the effect of export credit insurance and 
guarantees offered by foreign governments and by absorbing credit risks 
that the private section will not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. 
exporters to compete fairly in foreign markets on the basis of price 
and product. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 
12 U.S.C. 635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for Ex-
Im Bank Assistance.
    The collection will provide information needed to determine 
compliance and creditworthiness for transaction requests submitted to 
Ex-Im Bank under its long-term guarantee and direct loan programs. The 
form is currently used to make a credit decision on approximately 85 
export transactions per year in divisions dealing with aircraft, 
structured finance, and trade finance.
    The application can be viewed at www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib95-10.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before April 22, 2013 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Management and Budget, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB-3048-0013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 95-10 Application for Long Term Loan or 
Guarantee.
    OMB Number: 3048-0013.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information collected will provide information 
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction 
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term 
guarantee and direct loan programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 84.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.5 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 2,100.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Yearly.
    Total Cost to the Government: $81,312.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-06560 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.     Date: August 3, 2005 /s/ David P. Johnson         David P. Johnson
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                                       5
  <CIK>                                           0001003390
  <NAME>                                          LEISUREPLANET HOLDINGS, LTD.
         
  <S>                                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
  <PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
  <CASH>                                          21,316,901
  <SECURITIES>                                    0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   17,339,080
  <ALLOWANCES>                                    471,089
  <INVENTORY>                                     10,045,538
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,133,175
  <PP&E>                                          30,400,058
  <DEPRECIATION>                                  11,851,867
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  103,152,873
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,417,318
  <BONDS>                                         20,557,000
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
  <PREFERRED>                                     9,891
  <COMMON>                                        61,952
  <OTHER-SE>                                      36,983,538
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    103,152,783
  <SALES>                                         24,951,506
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,951,506
  <CGS>                                           15,391,288
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,019,680
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (746,540)
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              610,491
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,292,125)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                    318,299
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,466,120)
  <DISCONTINUED>                                  0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
  <CHANGES>                                       0
  <NET-INCOME>                                    (2,466,120)
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
          
  
</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject - FY 2001

(Updated on 04/10/02)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration


### June 26, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430, Suite 2W1000 Wilbur Wright Building 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Office of the Chief Counsel



### Re: In the Matter ofAviation Technical Services, Inc. 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 

# REC:EIVED JUL - 12013 HEARING DOCKET

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682; FAA Case No. 2010NM010105
Please take notice thathenceforth, the undersigned attorney represents the Administrator ofthe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in

### this matter. Sincerely, Peter J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

For Enforcement / ,/4> 

### By:

# ·~**,-""~~ Edmy~<f.**  Averman, 'III Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel (202) 267-3147 Cc: Dane B. Jaques, Esq.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that onthis date I have sentthe original and one copy byU.S. certified mail, postage prepaid, ofcounsel for the Administrator's Entry ofAppearance in the matter of Administrator v. Aviation Technica;l Services, Inc; FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682; FAA Case No. 2010NMOI0105, to:

Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430, Suite 2WIOOO Wilbur Wright Building 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

I also hereby certify that on this date I have sent one copy by U.S. certified mail, postage prepaid, ofthe foregoing document to

Date: June 26, 2013 Dane B. Jaques, Esq. McKenna Long & Aldridge 

### LLP 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22102
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CHARTERED**

**ACCOUNTANTS**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-174617, 333-158533, and 333-141353) of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (“the Company”) of our report, dated March 16, 2012, with respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 
| */s/   MacKay LLP*            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
| Vancouver,   British Columbia |   |
| Mach   13, 2013               |   |

 

----
# C_2004118EN.01003702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/37

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 April 2004

in Case T-127/02: Concept-Anlagen u. Geräte nach ‘GMP’ für Produktion u. Labor GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Figurative mark containing the word element ‘ECA’ - Absolute ground for refusal - Emblem of an international intergovernmental organisation - Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention)

(2004/C 118/79)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-127/02: Concept-Anlagen u. Geräte nach ‘GMP’ für Produktion u. Labor GmbH, established in Heidelberg (Germany), represented by G. Hodapp, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider) – action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 February 2002 (Case R 466/2000-2) on the application for registration of a figurative mark containing the word element ‘ECA’ as a Community trade mark – the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; Registrar, J. Plingers (Administrator), gave a judgment on 21 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002

1

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017040DE.01007802.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.2.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 40/78 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2015/1536 der Kommission vom 16. September 2015 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1321/2014 in Bezug auf die Angleichung der Vorschriften für die Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008, kritische Instandhaltungsarbeiten und Überwachung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit von Luftfahrzeugen

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 241 vom 17. September 2015](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2015_241_R_TOC)
)

Seite 21, Anhang I Nummer 2 zur Änderung von Anhang I (Teil-M) Punkt M.1 Punkt 4 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1321/2014:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | die Behörde, die verantwortlich ist für die Aufsicht über das Unternehmen zur Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit, das die Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit des Luftfahrzeugs ausübt, oder mit dem der Eigentümer einen befristeten Vertrag gemäß Punkt M.A.201(i)(3) geschlossen hat.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | die Behörde, die verantwortlich ist für die Aufsicht über das Unternehmen zur Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit, das die Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit des Luftfahrzeugs ausübt, oder mit dem der Eigentümer einen eingeschränkten Vertrag gemäß Punkt M.A.201(i)(3) geschlossen hat.“ |

---
# NRCS Climate Adaptation Plan

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  NRCS Climate Adaptation Plan 

NRCS's Climate Change Adaptation Plan, published in July 2022.

##   Documents

NRCS Climate Adaptation Plan(10.14 MB)
No. 91-474.

#### Martin *v.*Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.