# NAIMA / U.S. EPA

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Johns Manville International

Willows Plant

5916 County Road 49

Willows, California 95988

Project No. 10-3990.18

January 27, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

### Johns Manville Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 133 Melter located at

the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) C omplex in Willows, California:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formal dehyde, phenol, and methanol emission

rates from four exhaust stacks at the Willows Compl ex. The four exhaust stacks that were

evaluated for formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol em ission rates are as follows:

• Line 133 Forming and Collection (three stacks)

• Line 133 Cooling & Curing Oven (one stack)

Testing was performed with the assistance of Delta Air Quality Services (Delta AQS) of Orange,

California on behalf of BTEC. Reference test metho ds used and test program methodologies

were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to ini tiating test program fieldwork. Tables I

and II on the following pages summarize the overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

## ii Table I

Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Results Summ ary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 3.9 x 10 -2 

## 3.4 x 10 -1



## Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 2.8 x 10 -1 

## 2.4 x 10 0



## Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.5 x 10 0 

## 1.3 x 10+ 1 

## Stack 27 October 13

& 14, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 1.9 x 10 0 

## 1.6 x 10 +1



## Filterable

Particulate < 6.7 x 10 -2 

## 6.7 x 10 -1



## Antimony < 2.0 x 10 -5 

## 2.0 x 10 -4



## Arsenic 4.8 x 10 -1 

## 4.8 x 10 -3



## Beryllium < 5.0 x 10 -6 

## 5.0 x 10 -5



## Cadmium 2.1 x 10 -5 

## 2.1 x 10 -4



## Chromium 2.7 x 10 -5 

## 2.7 x 10 -4



## Cobalt < 5.0 x 10 -6 

## 5.0 x 10 -5



## Lead < 1.9 x 10 -5 

## 1.9 x 10 -4



## Manganese < 3.8 x 10 -5 

## 3.7 x 10 -4



## Nickel < 2.7 x 10 -5 

## 2.7 x 10 -4 

## Stack 27 October 20,

2010

Selenium 5.8 x 10 -4 

## 5.7 x 10 -3



## Stack 27 October 13,

2010 Mercury 3.7 x 10 -4 

## 3.3 x 10 -3



## Stack 27 October 14

& 15, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 1.2 x 10 -5 

## 1.2 x 10 -4



## Hydrogen

Chloride < 1.6 x 10 -2 

## 1.6 x 10 -1



## Stack 27 October 14

& 15, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 1.6 x 10 -2 

## 1.6 x 10 -1



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

### Johns Manville Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

## iii Table II

Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Resu lts Summary

Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 6.6 x 10 -2 

## 3.5 x 10 -1



## Methanol 3.3 x 10 -3 

## 1.8 x 10 -2 

## Stack 28 October 11,

2010

Phenol < 9.1 x 10 -4 

## 5.0 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 5.6 x 10 -2 

## 2.8 x 10 -1



## Methanol 2.2 x 10 -3 

## 1.1 x 10 -2 

## Stack 29 October 11,

2010

Phenol < 6.8 x 10 -4 

## 3.4 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 4.8 x 10 -2 

## 2.4 x 10 -1



## Methanol 3.0 x 10 -3 

## 1.5 x 10 -2 

## Stack 30 October 12,

2010

Phenol < 1.1 x 10 -3 

## 5.8 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 3.1 x 10 -1 

## 3.4 x 10 0



## Methanol 2.4 x 10 -3 

## 2.6 x 10 -2 

## Stack 31 October 12,

2010

Phenol < 3.9 x 10 -4 

## 4.2 x 10 -3



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

### Johns Manville Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

## iv TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 3

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 3

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... 4

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 4

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .................. 4

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 5

3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .. 5

3.7 HCOH, P HENOL



## , AND 

## M E 

## OH C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ........................... 5

4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 6

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Re sults Summary

Table 3 – Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Pr ogram Results Summary

(Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions)

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – L ine 133 Curing & Cooling

Figure 2 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – L ine 133 Forming & Collection

Figure 3 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – L ine 133 Melter

Figure 4 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng

Figure 5 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic D rawing

Figure 6 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng

Figure 7 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

Figure 8 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing

Figure 9 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

Figure 10 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Production Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 133 Melter located at

the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) C omplex in Willows, California:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formal dehyde, phenol, and methanol

emission rates from four exhaust stacks at the Will ows Complex. The four exhaust stacks that

were evaluated for formaldehyde, phenol, and methan ol emission rates are as follows:

• Line 133 Forming and Collection (three stacks)

• Line 133 Cooling & Curing Oven (one stack)

Testing was performed with the assistance of Delta Air Quality Services (Delta AQS) of Orange,

California on behalf of BTEC. Reference test metho ds used and test program methodologies

were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to ini tiating test program fieldwork. The

emissions test program was conducted on October 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 20, 2010. The test

program consisted of triplicate emission tests at e ach location for each parameter. The field

sampling portion of the emissions test program incl uded the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Barry Boulianne BTEC

Arlene Bell Delta AQS

Shannon Scrugham Delta AQS

John Peterson Delta AQS

Dave McCune Delta AQS

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

The exhaust stacks to be evaluated by this emission s test program are: (1) one exhaust stack

(Stack 27) associated with the Line 133 Melter Furn ace, (2) three exhaust stacks (Stack 28, 29

and 30) associated with the Line 133 Curing and Coo ling process and (3) one exhaust stack

(Stack 31) associated with the Line 133 Forming and Collection process.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, Line 133 was ope rated under normal conditions. Process

production data is available in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be

available to U.S. EPA on request.

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 3 

## 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into

seven categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates;

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals co ncentrations and emission rates;

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and em ission rates;

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium conc entrations and emission rates;

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentration s and emission rates;

(7) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and

emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.7, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Ana lyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates either in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate,

discrete measurements conducted in support of the n on-isokinetic sampling methodologies.

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1-3 for a traver se location drawing). An S-type pitot tube

with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accorda nce with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used

to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 4 

## intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 4.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

determined gravimetrically.

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured us ing U.S. EPA Other Test

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system

consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle

sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter a ssembly and heated probe, (4) a glass

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample

line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, a nd the fifth impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample

train is provided as Figure 5. The total filterabl e PM faction was collected on the front half of

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission R ates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission r ates were measured using the procedures of

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were

measured using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system

consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz noz zle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated

quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS i mpingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a

Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to

each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO 3 

## )/10%

hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the metals sampling train

is provided as Figure 6.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling

system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent tra p, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon tubing, (4)

three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, an d (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The f irst impinger was left empty as a water

knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica gel

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 7.

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 5 

## 3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rat es

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rat es were measured using the procedures of

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. He xavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling

system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzl e, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe

liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length of sample

line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated

orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger wa s filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two

were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling

train is provided as Figure 8.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and e mission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. T he Method 26A sampling train consisted

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner ; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter was hed quartz filter with Teflon filter

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) i mpingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known we ight of

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figur e 9 provides an illustration of the Method 26A

sample train.

3.7 HCOH, Phenol, and MeOH Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentration s and emission rates were conducted

using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Meth od 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and e mission rates were be measured using

Metco’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted

of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a gl ass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a

length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water,

and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic

drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provide d as Figure 10.

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 6 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2

Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Results Summ ary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 3.9 x 10 -2 

## 3.4 x 10 -1



## Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 2.8 x 10 -1 

## 2.4 x 10 0



## Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.5 x 10 0 

## 1.3 x 10+ 1 

## Stack 27 October 13

& 14, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 1.9 x 10 0 

## 1.6 x 10 +1



## Filterable

Particulate < 6.7 x 10 -2 

## 6.7 x 10 -1



## Antimony < 2.0 x 10 -5 

## 2.0 x 10 -4



## Arsenic 4.8 x 10 -1 

## 4.8 x 10 -3



## Beryllium < 5.0 x 10 -6 

## 5.0 x 10 -5



## Cadmium 2.1 x 10 -5 

## 2.1 x 10 -4



## Chromium 2.7 x 10 -5 

## 2.7 x 10 -4



## Cobalt < 5.0 x 10 -6 

## 5.0 x 10 -5



## Lead < 1.9 x 10 -5 

## 1.9 x 10 -4



## Manganese < 3.8 x 10 -5 

## 3.7 x 10 -4



## Nickel < 2.7 x 10 -5 

## 2.7 x 10 -4 

## Stack 27 October 20,

2010

Selenium 5.8 x 10 -4 

## 5.7 x 10 -3



## Stack 27 October 13,

2010 Mercury 3.7 x 10 -4 

## 3.3 x 10 -3



## Stack 27 October 14

& 15, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 1.2 x 10 -5 

## 1.2 x 10 -4



## Hydrogen

Chloride < 1.6 x 10 -2 

## 1.6 x 10 -1



## Stack 27 October 14

& 15, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 1.6 x 10 -2 

## 1.6 x 10 -1



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table in dicates that the emission rate was calculated using the

method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or

more of the sample fractions.

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 7 

## Table 3

Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Resu lts Summary

Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 6.6 x 10 -2 

## 3.5 x 10 -1



## Methanol 3.3 x 10 -3 

## 1.8 x 10 -2 

## Stack 28 October 11,

2010

Phenol < 9.1 x 10 -4 

## 5.0 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 5.6 x 10 -2 

## 2.8 x 10 -1



## Methanol 2.2 x 10 -3 

## 1.1 x 10 -2 

## Stack 29 October 11,

2010

Phenol < 6.8 x 10 -4 

## 3.4 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 4.8 x 10 -2 

## 2.4 x 10 -1



## Methanol 3.0 x 10 -3 

## 1.5 x 10 -2 

## Stack 30 October 12,

2010

Phenol < 1.1 x 10 -3 

## 5.8 x 10 -3



## Formaldehyde 3.1 x 10 -1 

## 3.4 x 10 0



## Methanol 2.4 x 10 -3 

## 2.6 x 10 -2 

## Stack 31 October 12,

2010

Phenol < 3.9 x 10 -4 

## 4.2 x 10 -3



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test run a re summarized in Appendix A. Process

production data is included in Appendix B. Field a nd computer-generated data sheets are

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibr ation documents and Appendix E includes

laboratory analytical reports.

### Johns Manville, Willows, California BTE C Project No. 10-3990.18

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 8 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Johns Manville International. BTEC will not distrib ute or publish this report without NAIMA’s

consent except as required by law or court order. B TEC accepts responsibility for the competent

performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with

the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential

damages.

This report was prepared by:

David Center

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### Stack Dimensions: 60.5" X 60.5"

Points Distance "

1 6.05

2 18.15

3 30.25

4 42.35

5 54.45

Site: Sampling Dates:

Johns Manville October 11 & 12, 2010

Willows, CA

Line 133 Curing & Cooling 

## Figure No. 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale > 1 Diameter

> 2 Diameters

### Diameter:

47.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.0

11 3.2

10 5.6

9 8.4

8 11.9

7 16.9

6 30.6

5 35.6

4 39.1

3 41.9

2 44.3

1 46.5

Site:

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133 Forming and Collecting 

## Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Diameter:

58.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.2

11 3.9

10 6.9

9 10.4

8 14.6

7 20.8

6 37.7

5 43.9

4 48.1

3 51.6

2 54.6

1 57.3

Site:

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133 Forming and Collecting 

## Figure 3

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 4

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133 BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagSite:USEPA OTM27/28Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganFigure 5**Pump Silica gel** **Heated Filter Box S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple** **Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle Meter Rig** **Temp. Probe** **Filter On** **Off -** **+ 00:00** **1 2 3 4 5 45mm Filter Housing** **Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter Verticle Condenser** **Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H** **2 O** Figure 6Site:USEPA Method 29Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 7Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 8Site:USEPA Method 0061Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySite:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,MichiganFigure 9PumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica GelSite:USEPA Method 316Johns Manville InternationalWillows, CALine 133BT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale Michigan 48220Figure 10PumpSilica gel100 ml Ultrafiltered H2OHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5

# APPENDIX A

Detailed Test Run Results

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

**Copyright by Walter Smith**

**Run Number** 1 2 3 Average

**Date Test Date** 10/13/2010 10/13/2010 10/14/2010

**Start Run Start Time** 10:30:45 10:30:45 8:10:00

**Run Finish Time** 14:13:42 14:13:42 11:33:20

**Net Traversing Points** 12 12 12



### Θ **Net Run Time, minutes** 200.13 200.13 199.64 200



### D N **Nozzle Diameter, inches** 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218



### C

p **Pitot Tube Coeficient** 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y **Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor** 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005



### P Br **Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.80 29.80 29.80 29.80



### ∆ H **Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2**  **O** 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42



### V

m **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet** 75.547 75.547 73.269 74.788



### t

m **Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F** 90.38 90.38 76.50 85.75



### V mstd **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf** 72.621 72.621 72.253 72.498



### V lc **Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml** 19 36.8 31.6 29.1



### V wstd **Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet** 0.89 1.73 1.49 1.37



### % H 2 

### O **Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %** 1.2 2.3 2.0 1.9



### M fd **Dry Mole Fraction** 0.988 0.977 0.980 0.981



### %CO 2 **Carbon Dioxide, %** 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.2



### %O 2 **Oxygen, %** 20.6 20.6 20.1 20.4



### % CO+ N 2 **Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %** 79.17 79.17 79.75 79.4



### M d **Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.86 28.86 28.83 28.85



### M

s **Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.73 28.61 28.61 28.65



### P

g **Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2**  **O** -0.63 -0.63 -0.63 -0.63



### P

s **Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.75 29.75 29.75 29.75



### t

s **Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F** 129 129 120 126



### ∆ P

avg **Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2**  **O** 0.278 0.278 0.276 0.278



### v

s **Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second** 31.3 31.3 31.0 31.2



### A

s **Stack Crossectional Area, square feet** 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7



### Q sd **Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm** 30,902 30,618

30,873

30,798



### Q

aw **Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm** 35,082 35,156

34,810

35,016



### %I **Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %** 84.8 85.6 84.7 85.0



### W

p **Production, tons glass per hour**



### W **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 0.90 0.60 0.60 0.70



### C mg/dscm **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 4.4E-01 2.9E-01 2.9E-01 3.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 5.1E-02 3.3E-02 3.4E-02 3.9E-02



### E lb/ton product **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0



### C mg/dscm **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 2.4E+00 2.9E+00 2.0E+00 2.4E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 2.8E-01 3.3E-01 2.3E-01 2.8E-01



### E lb/ton product **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 31.0 19.0 32.0 27.3



### C mg/dscm **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 1.5E+01 9.2E+00 1.6E+01 1.3E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 1.7E+00 1.1E+00 1.8E+00 1.5E+00



### E lb/ton product **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Total PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 36.9 25.6 36.6 33.0



### C mg/dscm **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 1.8E+01 1.2E+01 1.8E+01 1.6E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 2.1E+00 1.4E+00 2.1E+00 1.9E+00



### E lb/ton product **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product** 

### 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, Ca Stack #27 Source

JP PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/20/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:20:00 10:55:00 14:16:00

Run Finish Time 10:36:00 14:06:00 17:26:00

Net Traversing Points 25 25 25

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 188 188 188 188

D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.315 0.313 0.315 0.314

C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.65 29.65 29.65

∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.82 1.80 1.80 1.81

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 144.620 143.150 143.500 143.757

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 60.14 80.70 88.57 76.47

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 146.870 139.840 138.170 141.627

V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 66.8 85.3 74.8 75.6

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.14 4.02 3.52 3.56

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.1 2.8 2.5 2.5

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.979 0.972 0.975 0.975

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.1

%O 2 Oxygen, % 20.8 20.83 20.83 20.8

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.06 79.06 79.06 79.1

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.62 28.55 28.58 28.58

P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.61 29.61 29.61 29.61

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 111 120 126 119

∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.210 0.212 0.207 0.210

v

s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 27.0 27.4 27.2 27.2

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 27,147 26,919

26,531

26,865

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 30,283 30,764

30,529

30,525

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 96.8 95.8 97.4

W

p Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 2.2 2.7 3.1 2.7

C mg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.07

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

C mg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E-05 2.0E-05 2.0E-05 2.0E-05

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 16.5 19.5 21.2 19.1

C mg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 4.0E-03 4.9E-03 5.4E-03 4.8E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.0E-04 5.0E-04 5.4E-04 4.8E-04

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

C mg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-06 5.1E-06 5.1E-06 5.0E-06

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.83

C mg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.3E-04 3.6E-04 2.1E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-05 1.3E-05 3.6E-05 2.1E-05

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.72 0.72 1.83 1.09

C mg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-04 1.8E-04 4.7E-04 2.7E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.8E-05 4.6E-05 2.7E-05

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

C mg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-06 5.1E-06 5.1E-06 5.0E-06

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.4 1.4 0.8

C mg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-04 1.0E-04 3.7E-04 1.9E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 1.0E-05 3.7E-05 1.9E-05

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

C mg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-04 3.8E-04 3.8E-04 3.7E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1

C mg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 2.6E-04 2.5E-04 2.8E-04 2.7E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 2.5E-05 2.8E-05 2.7E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 19.5 23.9 25.5 23.0

C mg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.7E-03 6.0E-03 6.5E-03 5.7E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-04 6.1E-04 6.5E-04 5.8E-04

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, CA 27 Source

SS PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource IDJohns Manville Willows CA California 027 MelterPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)1 10/13/2010 10:20 10/13/2010 12:20 3.61E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B4.14E-042 10/13/2010 12:46 10/13/2010 14:46 2.99E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B3.43E-043 10/13/2010 15:04 10/13/2010 17:04 3.19E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B3.63E-04Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DatePage 1 of 31/27/2011M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit2.2 0.2 20.61 34,795 30,649 131flow and moisture from OTM27/28run 1 10:42 - 13:56R1, A 532 0.1 532.1 0 532.1 0.15 6% 02.2 0.2 20.61 34,795 30,649 134flow and moisture from OTM27/28run 1 10:42 - 13:56R2, A 436 0.2 436.2 0 436.2 0.15 1% 02.2 0.2 20.61 34,868 30,368 136flow and moisture from OTM27/28run 2 14:39 - 18:00R3, A 461 0.7 461.7 0 461.7 0.14 1% 0Trap #1≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass forHg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section1 for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmFlue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Page 2 of 31/27/2011M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit3.61R1, B 531.0 0.60 531.60 20 511.6 0.14 6% 03.70.1 10.2292 1592.99R2, B 449.0 0.40 449.40 20 429.4 0.15 1% 02.90.1 10.0598 443.19R3, B 449.0 0.40 449.40 20 429.4 0.15 1% 02.90.3 4 -0.1278 -94AverageRecovery,between 85 and115%Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass for Hgconc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm≥10 % RD massfor Hg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% RD or≤0.2μg/dscm abs.diff.for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm36Page 3 of 31/27/2011

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/14/2010 10/15/2010 10/15/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:18:00 7:58:00 11:49:00

Run Finish Time 15:35:00 11:18:00 15:05:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.283 0.283 0.283 0.283



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 30.00 30.00 29.93



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.20



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 125.695 121.726 123.400 123.607



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 96.76 76.58 96.47 89.94



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 119.687 121.055 118.319 119.687



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 52.12 61.4 77.1 63.5



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.45 2.89 3.63 2.99



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.0 2.3 3.0 2.4



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.980 0.977 0.970 0.976



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.1



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.1 20.16 20.2 20.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.72 79.71 79.71 79.7



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.61 28.57 28.50 28.56



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.76 29.96 29.96 29.89



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 134 120 133 129



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.218 0.209 0.196 0.208



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 27.9 26.9 26.4 27.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 27,181 26,931

25,661

26,591



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 31,352 30,235

29,676

30,421



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.3 100.3 102.9 100.5



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 1.2E-05 1.1E-05 1.2E-05



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

JM

Willows, CA 027 melter Source

JP Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/14/2010 10/15/2010 10/15/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:20:00 8:07:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 14:38:00 10:24:00 12:26:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.282 0.281 0.282 0.282



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 30.00 30.00 29.93



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.38 1.23 1.18 1.26



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 49.300 47.180 46.090 47.523



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.02 72.23 91.00 84.75



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 46.503 46.366 43.746 45.538



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 22.5 21.1 19.6 21.1



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.06 0.99 0.92 0.99



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.978 0.979 0.979 0.979



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.1



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.13 20.16 20.16 20.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7134 79.7054 79.7054 79.7



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.59 28.60 28.60 28.60



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.76 29.96 29.96 29.89



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 132 118 127 126



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.225 0.206 0.194 0.208



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.4 26.8 26.2 27.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 27,659 26,874

25,912

26,815



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 31,881 30,034

29,386

30,434



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.9 104.2 101.1 102.1



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.6E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 1.6E-02



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.6E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 1.6E-02



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

JM

Willows #27 Source

SS Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/11/2010 10/11/2010 10/11/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:25:00 13:20:00 16:15:00

Run Finish Time 12:36:00 15:05:00 17:38:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 125



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.71 29.71 29.71 29.71



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.94 0.83 0.80 0.85



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 69.681 66.673 52.585 62.980



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.34 88.26 94.02 87.87



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 67.982 64.209 50.111 60.767



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 42.2 38.6 33.2 38.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.99 1.82 1.56 1.79



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.9



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.972 0.972 0.970 0.971



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.09



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.24 20.16 20.10 20.17



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.64 79.76 79.83 79.74



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.82 28.82 28.82



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.52 28.52 28.49 28.51



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.5 -0.49 -0.50 -0.50



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.67 29.67 29.67 29.67



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 111 115 112 113



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.406 0.382 0.375 0.387



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.3 36.3 35.8 36.5



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 50,674 49,049

48,437

49,386



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 56,855 55,335

54,605

55,599



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.6 102.7 101.4 101.9



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 690 630 510 610



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-01 3.5E-01 3.6E-01 3.5E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.8E-02 6.4E-02 6.5E-02 6.6E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 29 27 33 30



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-02 1.5E-02 2.3E-02 1.8E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.9E-03 2.7E-03 4.2E-03 3.3E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 6 12 8



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-03 3.3E-03 8.5E-03 5.0E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-04 6.1E-04 1.5E-03 9.1E-04



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, CA Stack #28 Stack

JP Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/11/2010 10/11/2010 10/11/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:25:00 13:20:00 16:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:44:00 15:16:00 17:49:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 125



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.71 29.71 29.71 29.71



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.03



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 71.755 72.815 58.173 67.581



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 83.58 89.56 93.76 88.97



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 68.347 68.604 54.386 63.779



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 45.1 43.6 36 41.6



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.12 2.05 1.69 1.96



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.970 0.971 0.970 0.970



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.08 20.01 20.03 20.04



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.84 79.91 79.90 79.88



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.82 28.81 28.81 28.81



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.49 28.50 28.49 28.49



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.5 -0.50 -0.50 -0.50



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.67 29.67 29.67 29.67



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 109 113 114 112



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.470 0.462 0.451 0.461



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 40.1 39.9 39.5 39.8



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 54,556 54,022

53,281

53,953



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 61,127 60,895

60,249

60,757



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.0 96.7 100.7 98.8



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 510 540 440 497



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 2.6E-01 2.8E-01 2.9E-01 2.8E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 5.7E-02 5.6E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 19 16 23 19



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 9.8E-03 8.2E-03 1.5E-02 1.1E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E-03 1.7E-03 3.0E-03 2.2E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 6 6 6



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-03 3.1E-03 3.9E-03 3.4E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.3E-04 6.2E-04 7.8E-04 6.8E-04



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, Ca Stack #29 Stack

DM Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/11/2010 10/12/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:30:00 11:35:00 14:15:00

Run Finish Time 10:57:00 12:42:00 15:40:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 75 75 75 75



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.245 0.245 0.245 0.245



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.77 29.77 29.77 29.77



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.53 1.25 1.61 1.46



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 51.378 49.200 56.015 52.198



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 78.78 86.10 93.40 86.09



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 49.532 46.764 52.586 49.628



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 31.6 34.1 38.7 34.8



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.49 1.61 1.82 1.64



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.2



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.971 0.967 0.967 0.968



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.94 79.94 79.94 79.94



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.81 28.81 28.81 28.81



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.49 28.45 28.45 28.46



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.67 -0.67 -0.67 -0.67



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.72 29.72 29.72 29.72



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 104 108 108 107



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.466 0.380 0.477 0.441



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.5 36.2 40.3 38.7



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 54,349 49,281

54,899

52,843



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 60,173 55,225

61,517

58,972



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 94.7 99.1 99.5 97.7



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 320 350 360 343



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 2.3E-01 2.6E-01 2.4E-01 2.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-02 4.9E-02 5.0E-02 4.8E-02



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 19 25 20 21.3



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-02 1.9E-02 1.3E-02 1.5E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-03 3.5E-03 2.8E-03 3.0E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 12 6 8.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 4.3E-03 9.1E-03 4.0E-03 5.8E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-04 1.7E-03 8.3E-04 1.1E-03



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, CA Stack #30 Stack

DM Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 2 3 4 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/12/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:38:00 14:05:00 15:30:00

Run Finish Time 13:51:00 15:06:00 16:31:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.254 0.251 0.254 0.253



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.77 29.77 29.77 29.77



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.55 1.65 1.61 1.60



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 51.830 52.733 52.435 52.333



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 88.56 92.21 92.06 90.94



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 50.076 50.624 50.347 50.349



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 48.9 48.8 62.7 53.5



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.30 2.30 2.95 2.52



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.4 4.3 5.5 4.8



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.956 0.957 0.945 0.952



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.06 0.39 0.39 0.28



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 19.57 19.44 19.38 19.46



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.37 80.18 80.23 80.26



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.79 28.84 28.84 28.82



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.32 28.37 28.24 28.31



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.29 -0.20 -0.23 -0.24



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.75 29.76 29.75 29.75



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 130 131 132 131



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.410 0.455 0.424 0.430



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.5 40.5 39.2 39.4



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 24,177 25,420

24,264

24,620



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 28,432 29,896

28,951

29,093



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 99.2 101.0 100.3



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 4800 4700 5000 4833



### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 3.4E+00 3.3E+00 3.5E+00 3.4E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.1E-01 3.1E-01 3.2E-01 3.1E-01



### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 36 40 35 37



### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-02 2.8E-02 2.5E-02 2.6E-02



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-03 2.7E-03 2.2E-03 2.4E-03



### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-04 4.0E-04 3.8E-04 3.9E-04



### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.18

Johns Manville

Willows, CA Stack #31 Stack

JP Personnel

# APPENDIX B

Production Data

# APPENDIX C

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and

NotesBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe # PollutantPM2.5Points/PortStart Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethodOTM27/28Total Points1210:00 10:01316.95 316.95LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)Run #1Time/pt (min)16.68@ 15"SourceStack #27Delta ∆H@1.72Date10/13/10Time/reading16.68OperatorJPBws (%)1.22# of Ports2Total Run min200.13Filter Number10081630Condensate Volume0.5Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.80Silica Gel Weight Gain18.5DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.63Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.60Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.23Md28.86Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.73Act. Flow (cfm)35,082Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 72.43Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)31,283Moisture % 1.22Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)30,902Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 18.8 10:30317.01 0.35 123 82 800.740.43 225 73 66 1218.8 37.6 10:49323.96 0.35 125 85 830.740.42 224 73 59 1337.6 55.6 11:08331.09 0.32 126 85 870.680.42 228 73 59 1455.6 72.7 11:26337.91 0.29 127 88 870.610.42 229 71 56 1572.7 88.0 11:43344.46 0.23 127 87 860.490.42 230 72 57 1688.0 102.2 11:58350.20 0.20 127 87 860.420.42 229 72 59 11102.2 119.9 12:35355.67 0.31 128 89 880.660.42 228 73 68 12119.9 138.4 12:53362.30 0.34 132 93 900.720.42 227 75 55 13138.4 155.8 13:11369.29 0.30 132 97 930.640.42 227 75 56 14155.8 172.1 13:29375.83 0.26 134 100 950.550.42 228 73 54 15172.1 185.9 13:45382.01 0.19 133 102 970.400.42 226 72 52 16185.9 200.1 13:59387.18 0.20 132 104 980.420.42 228 72 52 1200.1 14:13392.56Average:75.550.28 128.8 91.6 89.20.590.42 227 73 57.75 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe # PollutantPM2.5Points/PortStart Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethodOTM27/28Total Points1214:30 14:31 0.0015"LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)Run #2Time/pt (min)16.7SourceStack #27Delta ∆H@1.717Date10/13/10Time/reading16.7 18:01 18:01 0.005"OperatorJPBws (%)2.3# of Ports2Total Run200.1Filter Number1008162Condensate Volume13.8Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.80Silica Gel Weight Gain23DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.63Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.6Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.23Md28.86Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.61Act. Flow (cfm)35,156Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 72.43Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)31,349Moisture % 2.34Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)30,618Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 18.8 10:30317.01 0.35 123 82 800.730.42 224 70 58 1.0218.8 37.6 10:49323.96 0.35 125 85 830.730.42 226 73 57 1.0337.6 55.6 11:08331.09 0.32 126 85 870.670.42 227 68 59 1.0455.6 72.7 11:26337.91 0.29 127 88 870.600.42 228 70 58 1.0572.7 88.0 11:43344.46 0.23 127 87 860.480.42 222 73 60 1.0688.0 102.2 11:58350.20 0.20 127 87 860.420.42 228 77 56 1.01102.2 119.9 12:35355.67 0.31 128 89 880.640.42 223 72 60 1.02119.9 138.4 12:53362.30 0.34 132 93 900.710.42 237 69 60 1.03138.4 155.8 13:11369.29 0.30 132 97 930.620.42 226 68 55 1.04155.8 172.1 13:29375.83 0.26 134 100 950.540.42 230 69 55 1.05172.1 185.9 13:45382.01 0.19 133 102 970.390.42 230 69 57 1.06185.9 200.1 13:59387.18 0.20 132 104 980.420.42 227 72 58 1.0200.1 14:13392.56Average:75.550.28 128.8 91.6 89.20.580.42 227.3 70.8 57.8 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##30PollutantPM2.5Points/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12wcsMethodOTM27/28Total Points128:00 8:01472.209 472.209 15"LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)Run #3Time/pt (min)16.6 11:35 11:36545.528545.578 5"SourceStack #27Delta ∆H@1.717Date10/14/10Time/reading16.6OperatorJPBws (%)2.0# of Ports2Total Run199.6Filter Number10010728Condensate Volume12.2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.80Silica Gel Weight Gain19.4DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.63Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.1Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.15Md28.83Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.61Act. Flow (cfm)34,810Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 72.07Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)31,509Moisture % 2.02Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)30,873Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 17.7 8:10472.31 0.31 112 56 540.640.42 225 70 56 1217.7 36.5 8:27478.47 0.35 115 61 580.720.42 232 70 44 1336.5 55.3 8:46485.40 0.35 116 63 610.720.42 231 63 49 1455.3 72.1 9:05491.98 0.28 117 70 650.580.42 235 68 49 1572.1 87.1 9:22498.00 0.22 114 75 710.450.42 236 66 50 1687.1 102.3 9:37503.39 0.23 114 81 770.480.42 236 69 52 11102.3 119.1 9:56508.91 0.28 123 85 830.580.42 236 73 59 12119.1 136.8 10:12515.16 0.31 126 89 880.640.42 232 76 57 13136.8 153.3 10:30522.09 0.27 127 88 880.560.42 235 76 59 14153.3 170.2 10:47528.15 0.28 126 87 870.580.42 230 77 61 15170.2 184.7 11:03534.43 0.21 126 88 870.430.42 232 77 60 16184.7 199.6 11:18539.90 0.22 125 87 870.450.42 223 70 58 1199.6 11:33545.58Average:73.270.28 120.1 77.5 75.50.570.42 231.9 71.3 54.5 1.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##72PollutantMETALSPoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod29Total Points24LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)8.0 7:00 7:01 0.002 @ 10"Source27Delta ∆H@1.717Date20-Oct-10Time/reading4.0 10:48 10:49 0.002 @ 10"OperatorSSBws (%)2.10# of Ports2Total Run188.0Filter Number83UP-535Condensate Volume44Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.61Barometric29.65Silica Gel Weight Gain22.8DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.65Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.315O2 (%)20.83Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00054CO2 (%)0.11Md28.85Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.62Act. Flow (cfm)30,283Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 145.99Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)141.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)27,728Moisture %2.11Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)27,147Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 7:20923.930 0.20 108 50 501.771.82 250 250 55 414.0 8.0 7:24927.080 0.20 108 50 501.771.82 250 250 55 428.0 12.0 7:28930.200 0.22 109 53 531.952.01 259 259 42 4212.0 16.0 7:32933.380 0.22 109 53 531.952.01 259 259 42 4316.0 20.0 7:36936.495 0.21 109 59 541.861.84 250 250 42 4320.0 24.0 7:40939.590 0.21 109 59 541.861.84 250 250 42 4424.0 28.0 7:44942.700 0.21 109 59 541.861.82 250 250 42 4428.0 32.0 7:48945.800 0.21 109 59 541.861.82 250 250 42 4532.0 36.0 7:52948.910 0.22 109 59 531.951.9 258 258 42 4536.0 40.0 7:56952.100 0.22 109 59 531.951.9 258 258 42 4640.0 44.0 8:00955.320 0.22 109 59 531.951.88 258 258 42 4644.0 48.0 8:04958.440 0.22 109 58 531.951.88 258 258 42 4748.0 52.0 8:08961.650 0.22 107 58 531.951.88 258 248 42 4752.0 56.0 8:12964.620 0.22 107 60 531.951.88 258 248 42 4856.0 60.0 8:16967.670 0.21 107 60 531.861.79 255 249 42 4860.0 64.0 8:20970.700 0.21 107 60 531.861.79 250 249 42 4964.0 68.0 8:24973.800 0.20 108 60 531.771.7 250 249 42 4968.0 72.0 8:28976.780 0.20 108 60 531.771.7 250 249 42 41072.0 76.0 8:32979.790 0.21 108 60 531.861.78 250 249 42 41076.0 80.0 8:36982.750 0.21 108 60 531.861.78 250 249 42 41180.0 84.0 8:40985.780 0.21 109 58 541.861.78 252 254 42 41184.0 88.0 8:44988.850 0.21 109 58 541.861.78 252 254 42 41288.0 92.0 8:48991.950 0.20 111 58 541.771.78 252 254 42 41292.0 96.0 8:52994.950 0.20 110 58 541.771.78 252 254 42 4196.0 100.0 9:04997.960 0.22 110 58 541.951.9 252 254 42 41100.0 104.0 9:081001.100 0.22 110 58 541.951.9 252 254 42 42104.0 108.0 9:121004.200 0.22 110 59 541.951.9 250 254 45 42108.0 112.0 9:161007.320 0.22 110 59 541.951.9 250 254 45 43112.0 116.0 9:201010.450 0.21 110 66 601.861.8 255 248 45 43116.0 120.0 9:241013.520 0.21 110 66 601.861.8 255 248 45 44120.0 124.0 9:281016.550 0.21 110 66 601.861.8 255 248 45 44124.0 128.0 9:321019.600 0.21 110 66 601.861.8 255 248 45 45128.0 132.0 9:361022.670 0.20 113 67 631.771.8 259 250 47 45132.0 136.0 9:401025.680 0.20 113 67 631.771.8 259 250 47 46136.0 140.0 9:441028.680 0.20 113 67 631.771.8 259 250 47 46140.0 144.0 9:481031.690 0.20 113 67 631.771.8 259 250 47 47144.0 148.0 9:521034.680 0.22 113 68 651.951.8 253 254 48 47148.0 152.0 9:561037.870 0.22 114 68 651.951.8 253 254 48 48152.0 156.0 10:001041.000 0.21 114 68 651.861.8 253 254 48 48156.0 160.0 10:041044.060 0.21 114 68 651.861.8 253 254 48 49160.0 164.0 10:081047.150 0.20 114 72 671.771.8 250 257 47 49164.0 168.0 10:121050.150 0.20 115 72 671.771.8 250 257 47 410168.0 172.0 10:161053.150 0.21 115 73 681.861.8 250 253 48 410172.0 176.0 10:201056.350 0.21 115 73 681.861.8 250 253 48 411176.0 180.0 10:241059.500 0.20 115 74 681.771.8 252 252 48 411180.0 184.0 10:281062.500 0.20 116 74 681.771.8 252 252 48 412184.0 188.0 10:321065.495 0.20 116 74 681.771.8 252 252 48 4188.0 10:361068.550Average:144.620.21 110.6 62.5 57.81.851.82 253 252 44.7234043 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##090PollutantMETALSPoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12wcsMethod29Total Points24LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.76Run #2Time/pt (min)8.0 10:4810:490.001@ 10"Source27Delta ∆H@1.717Date20-Oct-10Time/reading4.0 14:0814:090.001 @ 10"OperatorSSBws (%)2.8# of Ports2Total Run188.0Filter Number83UP-536Condensate Volume51.8Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.61Barometric29.65Silica Gel Weight Gain33.5DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.65Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.313O2 (%)20.83Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00053CO2 (%)0.11Md28.85Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.55Act. Flow (cfm)30,764Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 139.01Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)142.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)27,692Moisture %2.81Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)26,919Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 10:5571.800 0.23 116 74 702.001.8 250 250 65 314.0 8.0 10:5974.990 0.23 116 74 702.001.8 250 250 65 328.0 12.0 11:0378.180 0.22 117 75 731.921.8 250 250 65 3212.0 16.0 11:0781.300 0.22 117 75 731.921.8 250 250 65 3316.0 20.0 11:1184.380 0.22 117 75 731.921.8 250 250 65 3320.0 24.0 11:1587.515 0.22 117 75 731.921.8 250 250 65 3424.0 28.0 11:1990.610 0.20 116 75 731.741.8 260 254 65 3428.0 32.0 11:2393.690 0.20 116 75 731.741.8 260 254 65 3532.0 36.0 11:2796.595 0.22 118 76 741.921.8 258 258 64 3536.0 40.0 11:3199.730 0.22 118 76 741.921.8 258 258 64 3640.0 44.0 11:35102.850 0.22 118 76 741.921.8 258 258 64 3644.0 48.0 11:39105.950 0.22 118 76 741.921.8 258 258 64 3748.0 52.0 11:43109.000 0.21 119 77 741.831.8 255 255 64 3752.0 56.0 11:47112.000 0.21 119 77 741.831.8 255 255 64 3856.0 60.0 11:51115.000 0.21 119 77 741.831.8 255 255 64 3860.0 64.0 11:55118.000 0.21 119 77 741.831.8 255 255 64 3964.0 68.0 11:59120.995 0.22 120 83 781.921.8 257 253 64 3968.0 72.0 12:03124.050 0.22 120 83 781.921.8 257 253 64 31072.0 76.0 12:07127.200 0.22 120 83 781.921.8 257 253 64 31076.0 80.0 12:11130.300 0.22 120 83 781.921.8 257 253 64 31180.0 84.0 12:15133.460 0.20 120 83 781.741.8 255 255 65 31184.0 88.0 12:19134.390 0.20 120 83 781.741.8 255 255 65 31288.0 92.0 12:23139.400 0.20 120 83 781.741.8 255 255 65 31292.0 96.0 12:27142.395 0.20 120 83 781.741.8 255 255 65 3196.0 100.0 12:34145.400 0.20 120 82 811.741.8 261 249 65 31100.0 104.0 12:38148.395 0.20 120 82 811.741.8 261 249 65 32104.0 108.0 12:42151.385 0.20 120 82 811.741.8 261 249 65 32108.0 112.0 12:46154.375 0.20 120 82 811.741.8 261 249 65 33112.0 116.0 12:50157.365 0.22 122 88 841.921.8 259 250 58 33116.0 120.0 12:54160.450 0.22 122 88 841.921.8 259 250 58 34120.0 124.0 12:58163.450 0.22 122 88 841.921.8 259 250 58 34124.0 128.0 13:02166.490 0.22 122 88 841.921.8 259 250 58 35128.0 132.0 13:06169.590 0.23 123 86 842.001.8 257 249 53 35132.0 136.0 13:10172.750 0.23 123 86 842.001.8 257 249 53 36136.0 140.0 13:14175.910 0.23 123 86 842.001.8 257 249 53 36140.0 144.0 13:18179.060 0.23 123 86 842.001.8 257 249 53 37144.0 148.0 13:22182.220 0.21 123 88 841.831.8 254 250 55 37148.0 152.0 13:26185.240 0.21 123 88 841.831.8 254 250 55 38152.0 156.0 13:30188.275 0.21 123 88 841.831.8 254 250 55 38156.0 160.0 13:34191.300 0.21 123 88 841.831.8 254 250 55 39160.0 164.0 13:38194.320 0.20 124 88 841.741.8 254 249 58 39164.0 168.0 13:42197.250 0.20 124 88 841.741.8 254 249 58 310168.0 172.0 13:46200.190 0.20 124 88 841.741.8 254 249 58 310172.0 176.0 13:50203.120 0.20 124 88 841.741.8 254 249 58 311176.0 180.0 13:54206.060 0.20 124 89 851.741.8 255 250 59 311180.0 184.0 13:58209.010 0.20 124 89 851.741.8 255 250 59 312184.0 188.0 14:02212.950 0.20 124 89 851.741.8 255 250 59 3188.0 14:06214.950Average:143.150.21 120.4 82.3 79.11.851.80 255.9 251.7 61.3 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##72PollutantMETALSPoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12wcsMethod29Total Points2414:15 14:160.001 @ 10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.76Run #3Time/pt (min)8.0Source27Delta ∆H@1.717Date20-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorSSBws (%)2.5# of Ports2Total Run188.0Filter Number83UP-537Condensate Volume45.3Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.6117:2817:290.001 @ 10"Barometric29.65Silica Gel Weight Gain29.5DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.65Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.315O2 (%)20.83Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00054CO2 (%)0.11Md28.85Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.58Act. Flow (cfm)30,529Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 137.35Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)142.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)27,207Moisture %2.50Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)26,531Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 14:16215.400 0.20 123 87 851.801.8 257 250 65 314.0 8.0 14:20218.380 0.20 123 87 851.801.8 257 250 65 328.0 12.0 14:24221.360 0.20 123 87 851.801.8 257 250 65 3212.0 16.0 14:28224.450 0.20 123 87 851.801.8 257 250 65 3316.0 20.0 14:32227.510 0.22 124 88 841.981.8 254 251 60 3320.0 24.0 14:36230.640 0.22 124 88 841.981.8 254 251 60 3424.0 28.0 14:40233.770 0.22 124 88 841.981.8 254 251 60 3428.0 32.0 14:44237.000 0.22 124 88 841.981.8 254 251 60 3532.0 36.0 14:48240.135 0.21 124 88 861.891.8 249 255 63 3536.0 40.0 14:52243.310 0.21 124 88 861.891.8 249 255 63 3640.0 44.0 14:56246.365 0.21 124 88 861.891.8 249 255 63 3644.0 48.0 15:00249.410 0.21 125 88 861.891.8 249 255 65 3748.0 52.0 15:04252.470 0.20 125 90 891.801.8 248 248 65 3752.0 56.0 15:08255.450 0.20 125 90 891.801.8 248 248 65 3856.0 60.0 15:12258.410 0.20 125 90 891.801.8 248 248 65 3860.0 64.0 15:16261.400 0.20 125 90 891.801.8 248 248 62 3964.0 68.0 15:20264.390 0.22 125 92 871.981.8 248 255 62 3968.0 72.0 15:24267.530 0.22 125 92 871.981.8 248 255 62 31072.0 76.0 15:28270.650 0.22 125 92 871.981.8 248 255 62 31076.0 80.0 15:32273.710 0.22 125 92 871.981.8 248 255 61 31180.0 84.0 15:36276.810 0.20 126 94 901.801.8 256 249 61 31184.0 88.0 15:40279.800 0.20 126 94 901.801.8 256 249 61 31288.0 92.0 15:44282.890 0.20 126 94 901.801.8 256 249 61 31292.0 96.0 15:48285.880 0.20 126 94 901.811.8 256 249 61 3196.0 100.0 15:54288.880 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 31100.0 104.0 15:58291.870 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 32104.0 108.0 16:02294.860 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 32108.0 112.0 16:06297.890 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 33112.0 116.0 16:10300.890 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 33116.0 120.0 16:14304.000 0.20 125 95 901.801.8 252 250 61 34120.0 124.0 16:18307.010 0.20 127 97 901.801.8 254 247 63 34124.0 128.0 16:22310.000 0.20 127 93 891.801.8 254 247 63 35128.0 132.0 16:26313.000 0.20 127 93 891.801.8 254 247 63 35132.0 136.0 16:30315.980 0.20 127 93 891.801.8 254 247 63 36136.0 140.0 16:34318.980 0.22 129 90 891.981.8 255 250 60 36140.0 144.0 16:38322.110 0.22 129 90 881.981.8 255 250 60 37144.0 148.0 16:42325.240 0.23 128 89 882.071.8 255 250 60 37148.0 152.0 16:46328.430 0.23 128 89 872.071.8 255 250 60 38152.0 156.0 16:50331.630 0.21 132 86 871.891.8 255 248 60 38156.0 160.0 16:54334.720 0.21 132 86 851.891.8 255 248 60 39160.0 164.0 16:58337.820 0.21 132 86 851.891.8 255 248 60 39164.0 168.0 17:02341.000 0.21 132 86 851.891.8 255 248 60 310168.0 172.0 17:06344.100 0.20 129 86 851.801.8 258 248 59 310172.0 176.0 17:10347.060 0.20 129 86 831.801.8 258 248 59 311176.0 180.0 17:14350.020 0.20 129 86 831.801.8 258 248 59 311180.0 184.0 17:18352.980 0.20 129 86 831.801.8 258 248 59 312184.0 188.0 17:22355.940 0.20 129 86 831.801.8 250 248 59 3188.0 17:26358.900Average:143.500.21 126.3 90.1 87.11.871.80 253.1 250.0 61.5957447 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Willows CARate (L/m)1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.85Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)0.63Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.61 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2)18.70379CO2 (%)0.23Md28.86Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.63Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B10:20 0.0 126 254 253 1.1 1.1 5 5 0.00 0 86 86 4.034 4.225810:25 5.0 127 258 258 1.1 1.1 5 5 6.63 6.346 86 8710:30 10.0 127 258 258 1.1 1.1 5 6 13.35 12.95 86 8710:35 15.0 126 254 256 1.1 1.1 5 6 19.80 19.25 88 8910:40 20.0 216 255 256 1.1 1.1 5 6 26.20 25.5 88 8910:45 25.0 127 254 256 1.0 1.1 5 6 32.62 31.5 89 9010:50 30.0 127 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 6 38.78 37.95 90 9110:55 35.0 127 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 5 44.40 43.2 91 9211:00 40.0 128 256 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 50.14 49.6 92 9311:05 45.0 128 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 5 55.60 54.12 94 9511:10 50.0 128 255 256 1.0 1.0 4 5 61.80 60.4 94 9611:15 55.0 128 255 254 1.0 1.0 4 5 68.40 66.5 96 9711:20 60.0 127 255 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 74.09 71.95 98 9911:25 65.0 127 255 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 80.61 77.89 98 9911:30 70.0 127 256 257 1.0 1.0 5 6 87.21 84.16 99 10011:35 75.0 128 256 256 1.0 1.0 5 6 94.00 91 100 10111:40 80.0 127 255 257 1.0 1.0 5 6 102.31 98.01 100 10111:45 85.0 127 256 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 107.15 103.57 100 10111:50 90.0 127 256 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 113.54 110.15 101 10211:55 95.0 127 254 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 120.62 117.62 101 10212:00 100.0 127 254 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 126.81 123.85 101 10212:05 105.0 127 254 258 1.0 1.05 5 6 132.61 125.95 101 10212:10 110.0 128 253 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 138.94 135.85 99 9912:15 115.0 128 253 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 145.29 142.01 99 9812:20 120.0151.294 148.8994.1896 4.3722Average 120.0 130.9 254.9 256.194.875 95.75Volume151.294 148.8990.1556 0.1464dscm0.14 0.140.15 0.14Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.000 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12" 0.005 @ 12" 0.002 @ 10"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Willows CARate (L/m)1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.63Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.61 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2)18.70379CO2 (%)0.23Md28.86Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.63Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B12:46 0.0 131 236 237 1 1 5 5 0.00 0 97 98 4.190 4.38212:51 5.0 130 254 254 1 1 4 5 6.12 5.87 97 9712:56 10.0 130 253 254 1 1 5 5 11.89 11.05 97 9713:01 15.0 131 255 251 1 1 5 6 17.56 16.41 97 9813:06 20.0 133 255 251 1 1 5 5 23.42 22.41 97 9613:11 25.0 133 255 253 1 1 5 5 29.29 28.64 97 9613:16 30.0 132 255 256 1 1 5 6 35.70 35.32 97 9713:21 35.0 133 256 253 1 1 5 6 42.61 42.3 97 9713:26 40.0 132 255 254 1 1 5 5 47.91 47.36 97 9813:31 45.0 134 257 254 1 1 5 5 54.44 53.55 97 9813:36 50.0 134 256 256 1 1 5 5 61.25 60.03 97 9813:41 55.0 134 257 256 1 1 5 5 67.35 66.95 97 9813:46 60.0 134 256 253 1 1 5 5 73.58 73.15 98 9913:51 65.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 80.58 79.95 99 10013:56 70.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 88.00 86.41 99 10014:01 75.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 94.31 92.51 99 10014:06 80.0 135 255 253 1 1 5 5 101.56 98.82 99 10014:11 85.0 135 255 254 1 1 5 5 105.21 105.32 99 10014:16 90.0 136 254 251 1 1 5 5 114.91 111.89 99 10014:21 95.0 136 255 253 1 1 5 5 121.45 118.95 99 10114:26 100.0 135 254 252 1 1 5 5 127.85 124.95 99 10114:31 105.0 135 253 251 1 1 5 5 134.16 131.36 99 10114:36 110.0 135 254 252 1 1 5 5 141.59 138.15 99 10114:41 115.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 144.82 143.75 99 10114:46 120.0150.735 149.4834.345 4.539Average 120.0 133.5 254.0 252.597.95833333 98.83Volume150.735 149.4830.155 0.1568dscm0.14 0.140.15 0.15Trap/ Probe Temp0.004 @ 12"Pre Test Post Test0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 8"0.002 @8"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Willows CARate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BBBws (%)2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.63Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.61 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2)18.70379CO2 (%)0.23Md28.86Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.63Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B15:04 0.0 133 251 252 1 1 4 4 0.00 0 104 104 4.3454 4.539615:09 5.0 133 252 252 1 1 4 4 6.12 5.85 104 10415:14 10.0 131 251 252 1 1 4 5 12.21 11.59 104 10515:19 15.0 130 250 251 1 1 5 5 17.68 18.05 105 10615:24 20.0 133 250 254 1 1 5 5 23.95 24.27 104 10515:29 25.0 135 251 251 1 1 5 5 30.15 30.26 105 10515:34 30.0 135 251 252 1 1 5 5 36.45 36.54 105 10615:39 35.0 135 251 254 1 1 5 5 42.81 42.81 105 10615:44 40.0 135 250 251 1 1 5 5 48.99 48.96 106 10615:49 45.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 56.55 56.31 106 10515:54 50.0 133 253 253 1 1 5 5 62.91 62.81 106 10615:59 55.0 134 253 253 1 1 5 5 69.19 68.66 106 10616:04 60.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 74.19 73.66 105 10616:09 65.0 133 251 254 1 1 5 5 80.89 80.62 105 10616:14 70.0 137 251 252 1 1 5 5 86.56 86.21 105 10516:19 75.0 138 250 252 1 1 5 5 93.25 93.15 105 10616:24 80.0 138 253 251 1 1 5 5 99.82 99.75 106 10616:29 85.0 140 253 250 1 1 5 5 105.71 105.68 106 10516:34 90.0 141 252 251 1 1 5 5 111.75 111.85 106 10516:39 95.0 140 251 251 1 1 5 5 118.43 118.41 106 10516:44 100.0 141 251 250 1 1 5 5 124.85 121.81 105 10516:49 105.0 142 252 252 1 1 5 5 131.68 131.59 106 10516:54 110.0 142 251 251 1 1 5 6 138.15 137.91 105 10516:59 115.0 142 251 251 1 1 5 6 144.52 144.23 105 10517:04 120.0150.981 150.5254.5008 4.6972Average 120.0 136.3 251.5 252.0105.2083333 105.33Volume150.981 150.5250.1554 0.1576dscm0.14 0.140.14 0.15Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.002 @ 17" 0.002 @10" 0.005 @12" 0.002 @ 10"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe #90PollutantCr6Points/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12 wcsMethod61Total Points2412:15 12:16547.99 547.991LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)8.0Source027 melterDelta ∆H@1.717Date14-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorJPBws (%)2.01# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume20.52Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.76Barometric29.80Silica Gel Weight Gain31.6DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.283O2 (%)20.13Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00044CO2 (%)0.15Md28.83Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.61Act. Flow (cfm)31,352Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 119.14Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)27,738Moisture %2.02Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)27,181Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 12:18548.07 0.22 131 91 911.311.2660 114.0 8.0 12:22550.486 0.22 131 88 901.311.2658 128.0 12.0 12:26552.995 0.22 130 89 901.311.2656 1212.0 16.0 12:30555.405 0.22 130 90 901.311.2656 1316.0 20.0 12:34557.901 0.22 131 90 901.311.2659 1320.0 24.0 12:38560.4 0.22 131 91 901.311.2660 1424.0 28.0 12:42562.854 0.25 131 92 901.491.4359 1428.0 32.0 12:46565.47 0.25 131 92 901.491.4359 1532.0 36.0 12:50567.999 0.23 132 93 901.371.3160 1536.0 40.0 12:54570.70 0.23 132 93 911.371.3160 1640.0 44.0 12:58573.365 0.21 132 94 911.251.2862 1644.0 48.0 13:02575.925 0.21 132 94 921.251.2862 1748.0 52.0 13:06578.654 0.20 134 96 921.191.1461 1752.0 56.0 13:10581 0.20 133 96 921.191.1461 1856.0 60.0 13:14583.652 0.20 133 97 931.191.1460 1860.0 64.0 13:18586.09 0.20 133 98 931.191.1460 1964.0 68.0 13:22588.65 0.19 133 99 941.131.0960 1968.0 72.0 13:26591.18 0.19 134 100 951.131.0960 11072.0 76.0 13:30593.701 0.19 133 100 961.131.0960 11076.0 80.0 13:34596.25 0.19 134 101 961.131.0960 11180.0 84.0 13:38598.901 0.23 134 101 971.371.3259 11184.0 88.0 13:42601.4 0.23 134 101 971.371.3259 11288.0 92.0 13:46604.169 0.19 134 102 971.131.0962 11292.0 96.0 13:50606.562 0.19 134 103 981.131.0962 1196.0 100.0 13:59609.20 0.16 131 103 1000.950.9266 11100.0 104.0 14:03611.46 0.16 131 103 1000.950.9265 12104.0 108.0 14:07613.754 0.16 131 103 1000.950.9263 12108.0 112.0 14:11616.00 0.16 131 103 1000.950.9260 13112.0 116.0 14:15618.22 0.20 134 103 1021.191.1559 13116.0 120.0 14:19620.958 0.20 134 103 1011.191.1559 14120.0 124.0 14:23623.581 0.24 135 102 1011.431.3861 14124.0 128.0 14:27626.251 0.24 135 103 1011.431.3861 15128.0 132.0 14:31628.96 0.23 135 103 1011.371.3260 15132.0 136.0 14:35631.76 0.23 135 102 1001.371.3260 16136.0 140.0 14:39634.425 0.24 135 101 1001.431.3858 16140.0 144.0 14:43637.195 0.24 135 101 1001.431.3858 17144.0 148.0 14:47640.025 0.25 135 101 991.491.4456 17148.0 152.0 14:51642.995 0.25 136 101 991.491.4456 18152.0 156.0 14:55645.951 0.25 136 101 981.491.4456 18156.0 160.0 14:59649.023 0.25 136 101 981.491.4456 19160.0 164.0 15:03652.003 0.25 136 98 971.491.4458 19164.0 168.0 15:07654.9 0.25 136 98 971.491.4458 110168.0 172.0 15:11657.86 0.24 136 98 961.431.3857 110172.0 176.0 15:15660.645 0.24 135 98 961.431.3857 111176.0 180.0 15:19663.209 0.22 136 97 951.311.2758 111180.0 184.0 15:23665.60 0.22 136 96 951.311.2758 112184.0 188.0 15:27668.23 0.24 136 95 941.431.3860 112188.0 192.0 15:31671 0.24 136 95 941.431.3859 1192.0 15:35673.769Average:125.700.22 133.5 97.9 95.61.301.25 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 59.4583333 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe #90PollutantCr6Points/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12 wcsMethod61Total Points2412:15 12:16547.99 547.991LocationWillowsRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)8.0Source027 melterDelta ∆H@1.717Date15-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorJPBws (%)2.3# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume32.3Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.9613:5713:58609.300609.300Barometric30.00Silica Gel Weight Gain29.1DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)30.00Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.283O2 (%)20.16Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00044CO2 (%)0.13Md28.83Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.57Act. Flow (cfm)30,235Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 120.52Preliminary dP (in H20)0.22Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)27,574Moisture %2.34Preliminary Ts (oF)138Est. Us (ft/s)28.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)26,931Preliminary Tm (oF)90Theor Dn (in)0.3010Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 7:58674.40 0.19 112 59 561.111.0745 114.0 8.0 8:02676.632 0.19 112 59 561.111.1045 128.0 12.0 8:06678.95 0.23 112 59 561.341.3345 1212.0 16.0 8:10681.55 0.23 113 59 561.341.3344 1316.0 20.0 8:14684.213 0.25 114 62 591.461.4444 1320.0 24.0 8:18687.023 0.25 115 64 581.461.4443 1424.0 28.0 8:22689.521 0.24 115 65 591.401.3942 1428.0 32.0 8:26691.995 0.24 115 66 591.401.3943 1532.0 36.0 8:30694.421 0.25 115 66 601.461.4443 1536.0 40.0 8:34697.02 0.25 116 68 611.461.4443 1640.0 44.0 8:38699.645 0.24 116 69 611.401.3943 1644.0 48.0 8:42702.3 0.24 116 71 701.401.3943 1748.0 52.0 8:46704.975 0.24 116 71 641.401.3943 1752.0 56.0 8:50707.67 0.24 117 73 651.401.3943 1856.0 60.0 8:54710.352 0.22 117 74 661.281.2744 1860.0 64.0 8:58712.92 0.22 117 74 661.281.2744 1964.0 68.0 9:02715.49 0.22 118 75 681.281.2745 1968.0 72.0 9:06718.04 0.22 118 76 691.281.2745 11072.0 76.0 9:10720.601 0.20 118 77 701.171.1547 11076.0 80.0 9:14723.106 0.20 119 78 711.171.1547 11180.0 84.0 9:18725.801 0.19 119 79 721.111.1047 11184.0 88.0 9:22728.301 0.19 119 78 731.111.1047 11288.0 92.0 9:26730.506 0.20 119 79 731.171.1548 11292.0 96.0 9:30733.205 0.20 119 79 741.171.1648 1196.0 100.0 9:42735.85 0.15 118 77 750.880.8752 11100.0 104.0 9:46737.85 0.15 118 77 750.880.8752 12104.0 108.0 9:50739.895 0.15 118 77 750.880.8750 12108.0 112.0 9:54741.90 0.15 120 82 780.880.8750 13112.0 116.0 9:58744.10 0.18 120 84 781.051.0454 13116.0 120.0 10:02746.521 0.18 121 85 801.051.0454 14120.0 124.0 10:06748.952 0.18 121 86 801.051.0454 14124.0 128.0 10:10751.4 0.18 123 86 811.051.0454 15128.0 132.0 10:14753.79 0.20 123 87 821.171.1555 15132.0 136.0 10:18756.45 0.20 123 87 821.171.1555 16136.0 140.0 10:22759.003 0.21 123 88 831.231.2152 16140.0 144.0 10:26761.6 0.21 124 89 841.231.2152 17144.0 148.0 10:30764.2 0.21 124 90 841.231.2153 17148.0 152.0 10:34766.93 0.21 124 90 851.231.2153 18152.0 156.0 10:38769.624 0.21 124 91 861.231.2153 18156.0 160.0 10:42772.253 0.21 124 91 861.231.2153 19160.0 164.0 10:46774.821 0.22 125 92 871.281.2753 19164.0 168.0 10:50777.551 0.22 128 94 881.281.2753 110168.0 172.0 10:54780.30 0.21 125 94 881.231.2154 110172.0 176.0 10:58783.029 0.21 126 98 881.231.2154 111176.0 180.0 11:02785.581 0.21 126 95 901.231.2155 111180.0 184.0 11:06788.25 0.21 126 95 901.231.2155 112184.0 188.0 11:10790.698 0.21 126 95 901.231.2155 112188.0 192.0 11:14793.5 0.21 126 95 901.231.2155 1192.0 11:18796.1255Average:121.730.21 119.6 79.3 73.91.221.20 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 49.0 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe #90PollutantCr6+Points/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12wcsMethod0061Total Points2411:45 11:46799.400 799.400LocationWillowsRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)8.0Source027 melterDelta ∆H@1.717Date15-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorJPBws (%)3.0# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume44.6Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.9615:0615:07922.950922.950Barometric30.00Silica Gel Weight Gain32.5DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)30.00Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.6Actual Dn (in)0.283O2 (%)20.16Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)4.88An (ft^2)0.00044CO2 (%)0.13Md28.83Stack Area (sf)18.70Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.50Act. Flow (cfm)29,676Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 117.81Preliminary dP (in H20)0.22Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)26,449Moisture %2.99Preliminary Ts (oF)138Est. Us (ft/s)28.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)25,661Preliminary Tm (oF)90Theor Dn (in)0.3018Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 11:49799.50 0.17 128 96 960.99152 114.0 8.0 11:53802.002 0.17 128 96 960.991.0052 128.0 12.0 11:57804.421 0.17 130 96 960.991.0052 1212.0 16.0 12:01806.89 0.17 130 99 970.991.0053 1316.0 20.0 12:05809.105 0.17 130 99 970.991.0054 1320.0 24.0 12:09811.553 0.17 130 99 970.991.0054 1424.0 28.0 12:13813.954 0.20 130 99 971.171.1755 1428.0 32.0 12:17816.636 0.20 131 100 971.171.1755 1532.0 36.0 12:21819.2 0.22 131 99 971.291.2956 1536.0 40.0 12:25821.86 0.22 131 98 971.291.2956 1640.0 44.0 12:29824.676 0.20 131 98 971.171.1757 1644.0 48.0 12:33827.345 0.20 131 98 961.171.1757 1748.0 52.0 12:37830.005 0.21 131 98 961.231.2359 1752.0 56.0 12:41832.804 0.21 132 98 961.231.2359 1856.0 60.0 12:45835.56 0.23 131 98 961.351.3559 1860.0 64.0 12:49838.30 0.23 131 98 971.351.3559 1964.0 68.0 12:53841.20 0.24 131 98 971.401.4154 1968.0 72.0 12:57844.02 0.24 132 98 971.401.4154 11072.0 76.0 13:01846.678 0.22 132 99 971.291.2952 11076.0 80.0 13:05849.2 0.22 132 99 971.291.2952 11180.0 84.0 13:09851.83 0.21 133 97 971.231.2353 11184.0 88.0 13:13854.645 0.21 133 98 971.231.2353 11288.0 92.0 13:17857.201 0.21 133 97 971.231.2353 11292.0 96.0 13:21859.888 0.21 133 97 961.231.2353 1196.0 100.0 13:29862.56 0.21 134 95 951.231.2352 11100.0 104.0 13:33865.34 0.21 134 95 951.231.2352 12104.0 108.0 13:37867.775 0.21 134 96 951.231.2352 12108.0 112.0 13:41870.60 0.21 134 96 951.231.2353 13112.0 116.0 13:45873.00 0.15 134 97 950.880.8852 13116.0 120.0 13:49875.201 0.15 134 96 950.880.8852 14120.0 124.0 13:53877.412 0.16 134 97 960.940.9455 14124.0 128.0 13:57879.8 0.16 134 96 960.940.9455 15128.0 132.0 14:01882.13 0.18 135 96 961.051.0553 15132.0 136.0 14:05884.68 0.18 135 96 961.051.0553 16136.0 140.0 14:09887.143 0.18 135 96 961.051.0554 16140.0 144.0 14:13889.77 0.18 135 95 951.051.0554 17144.0 148.0 14:17892.199 0.19 136 96 951.111.1156 17148.0 152.0 14:21894.723 0.19 136 96 951.111.1156 18152.0 156.0 14:25897.345 0.20 136 97 961.171.1757 18156.0 160.0 14:29899.945 0.20 136 97 961.171.1757 19160.0 164.0 14:33902.612 0.20 136 97 961.171.1752 19164.0 168.0 14:37905.195 0.20 136 97 961.171.1752 110168.0 172.0 14:41907.73 0.19 136 96 961.111.1159 110172.0 176.0 14:45910.345 0.19 136 95 951.111.1159 111176.0 180.0 14:49913.009 0.19 137 95 951.111.1159 111180.0 184.0 14:53915.43 0.19 136 95 951.111.1159 112184.0 188.0 14:57917.905 0.19 136 94 941.111.1159 112188.0 192.0 15:01920.513 0.19 137 95 941.111.1159 1192.0 15:05922.9Average:123.400.20 133.1 96.9 96.01.151.15 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 54.875 1.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method M26A Total Points 24 12:09 12:10 .002 @ 7"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 3.0 14:43 14:44 .002 @ 10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 14-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.21 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 5.6 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96

Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 16.9 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.282 O2 (%) 20.13 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.2 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.59 Act. Flow (cfm) 31,774 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 46.59 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 28,383

Moisture % 2.22 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 27,755

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3009 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 12:20 919.11 0.20 127 85 85 1.23 1.3 250 250 60 4

2 3.0 6.0 12:23 921.05 0.20 127 85 85 1.23 1.3 250 250 60 4

3 6.0 9.0 12:26 923.00 0.21 127 85 85 1.29 1.4 250 250 60 4

4 9.0 12.0 12:29 924.90 0.21 130 86 86 1.29 1.4 250 250 60 4

5 12.0 15.0 12:32 926.85 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

6 15.0 18.0 12:35 928.80 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

7 18.0 21.0 12:38 930.80 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

8 21.0 24.0 12:41 932.75 0.25 130 87 87 1.54 1.5 250 249 60 4

9 24.0 27.0 12:44 934.86 0.25 130 87 87 1.54 1.5 250 249 60 4

10 27.0 30.0 12:47 936.90 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

11 30.0 33.0 12:50 938.80 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

12 33.0 36.0 12:53 940.75 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

1 36.0 39.0 14:02 944.68 0.22 133 92 92 1.35 1.3 250 250 65 4

2 39.0 42.0 14:05 946.65 0.25 133 92 92 1.54 1.5 250 250 65 4

3 42.0 45.0 14:08 948.72 0.25 133 92 92 1.54 1.5 250 250 65 4

4 45.0 48.0 14:11 950.81 0.25 134 95 95 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

5 48.0 51.0 14:14 952.90 0.25 134 95 95 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

6 51.0 54.0 14:17 954.90 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

7 54.0 57.0 14:20 956.90 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 254 65 4

8 57.0 60.0 14:23 958.92 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 254 65 4

9 60.0 63.0 14:26 961.00 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

10 63.0 66.0 14:29 962.85 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

11 66.0 69.0 14:32 964.71 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

12 69.0 72.0 14:35 966.56 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

72.0 14:38 968.41

Average: 49.30 0.23 131.8 91.1 91.0 1.39 1.38 250 250 62.875 4 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method M26A Total Points 24 8:00 8:01 0.0 @ 10"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0 10:25 10:26 0.0 @10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 11.4 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96

Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.7 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.281 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,034 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 46.16 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,449

Moisture % 2.11 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 26,874

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3007 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 8:07 969.82 0.20 115 60 60 1.20 1.2 250 250 60 3

2 3.0 6.0 8:10 971.60 0.20 115 59 59 1.20 1.2 250 248 45 3

3 6.0 9.0 8:13 973.41 0.20 115 59 59 1.20 1.2 250 252 45 3

4 9.0 12.0 8:16 975.25 0.20 116 65 60 1.20 1.2 250 249 47 3

5 12.0 15.0 8:19 977.09 0.20 116 65 60 1.20 1.2 250 249 47 3

6 15.0 18.0 8:22 979.00 0.22 116 68 61 1.32 1.3 251 251 48 3

7 18.0 21.0 8:25 980.83 0.22 116 68 61 1.32 1.3 251 251 48 3

8 21.0 24.0 8:28 982.75 0.22 116 69 63 1.32 1.3 249 250 49 3

9 24.0 27.0 8:31 984.69 0.22 116 69 63 1.32 1.3 249 250 49 3

10 27.0 30.0 8:34 986.62 0.20 116 69 63 1.20 1.2 249 250 49 3

11 30.0 33.0 8:37 988.46 0.20 116 73 65 1.20 1.2 250 253 50 3

12 33.0 36.0 8:40 990.35 0.20 116 73 65 1.20 1.2 250 253 50 3

1 36.0 39.0 9:48 994.13 0.20 119 74 75 1.20 1.2 248 247 50 3

2 39.0 42.0 9:51 996.00 0.20 120 77 75 1.20 1.2 248 247 54 3

3 42.0 45.0 9:54 997.90 0.20 120 77 75 1.20 1.2 250 251 54 3

4 45.0 48.0 9:57 999.75 0.20 121 82 77 1.20 1.2 250 246 53 3

5 48.0 51.0 10:00 1001.63 0.20 121 82 78 1.20 1.2 252 250 54 3

6 51.0 54.0 10:03 1003.52 0.20 121 84 79 1.20 1.2 248 244 56 3

7 54.0 57.0 10:06 1005.40 0.22 121 84 80 1.32 1.3 248 253 57 3

8 57.0 60.0 10:09 1007.36 0.22 122 84 80 1.32 1.3 251 244 57 3

9 60.0 63.0 10:12 1009.34 0.22 122 84 80 1.32 1.3 247 252 57 3

10 63.0 66.0 10:15 1011.33 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.2 248 251 57 3

11 66.0 69.0 10:18 1013.22 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.20 248 251 57 3

12 69.0 72.0 10:21 1015.10 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.2 248 251 57 3

72.0 10:24 1017.00

Average: 47.18 0.21 118.4 74.3 70.2 1.24 1.23 249.4 249.7 52.1 3 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method 29 Total Points 24 10:45 10:46 0.002 @10"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0 12:28 12:29 0.002 @ 10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 6.3 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.76

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13.3 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.282 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 29,485 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 43.26 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 26,371

Moisture % 2.09 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 25,822

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3002 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta

H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 10:50 1018.60 0.20 124 86 87 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

2 3.0 6.0 10:53 1020.40 0.20 124 86 87 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

3 6.0 9.0 10:56 1022.23 0.20 124 88 87 1.24 1.2 250 248 65 3

4 9.0 12.0 10:59 1024.05 0.20 125 88 88 1.24 1.2 250 254 65 3

5 12.0 15.0 11:02 1025.92 0.20 124 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 254 65 3

6 15.0 18.0 11:05 1027.82 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

7 18.0 21.0 11:08 1029.72 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 252 65 3

8 21.0 24.0 11:11 1031.63 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

9 24.0 27.0 11:14 1033.51 0.20 126 90 88 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

10 27.0 30.0 11:17 1035.39 0.20 126 90 89 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

11 30.0 33.0 11:20 1037.25 0.20 126 90 89 1.24 1.2 247 241 65 3

12 33.0 36.0 11:23 1039.11 0.20 126 91 89 1.24 1.2 251 255 65 3

1 36.0 39.0 11:50 1042.80 0.18 128 91 90 1.12 1.12 253 255 65 3

2 39.0 42.0 11:53 1044.60 0.18 128 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 252 65 3

3 42.0 45.0 11:56 1046.40 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 251 250 63 3

4 45.0 48.0 11:59 1048.20 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

5 48.0 51.0 12:02 1049.98 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

6 51.0 54.0 12:05 1051.75 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

7 54.0 57.0 12:08 1053.50 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 252 248 63 3

8 57.0 60.0 12:11 1055.30 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

9 60.0 63.0 12:14 1057.13 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

10 63.0 66.0 12:17 1059.01 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

11 66.0 69.0 12:20 1060.90 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 250 250 64 3

12 69.0 72.0 12:23 1062.78 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 250 250 64 3

72.0 12:26 1064.69

Average: 46.09 0.19 127.1 91.4 90.6 1.21 1.18 249.9 250.1 64.375 3.0 Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##90PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2510:20 10:21 0.00@15"LocationWillowsRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)5.0 12:40 12:21 0.00@10"Source#28Delta ∆H@1.717Date11-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorJPBws (%)2.84# of Ports5Total Run125.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume28.9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain13.3DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.5Actual Dn (in)0.222O2 (%)20.24Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00027CO2 (%)0.11Md28.83Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.52Act. Flow (cfm)56,855Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 67.74Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)93.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)52,154Moisture % 2.85Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)50,674Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2490Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 5.0 10:25912.02 0.25 110 78 770.560.58 250 62 145.0 10.0 10:30914.10 0.42 109 78 770.940.97 231 52 1310.0 15.0 10:35917.00 0.40 109 79 770.900.93 241 50 1215.0 20.0 10:40919.90 0.31 109 79 780.700.72 240 50 1120.0 25.0 10:45922.40 0.26 109 80 780.580.6 241 55 1525.0 30.0 10:50924.68 0.25 111 79 780.560.58 240 63 1430.0 35.0 10:57927.00 0.48 110 80 781.081.11 248 57 1335.0 40.0 11:02930.00 0.57 110 81 791.281.32 243 56 1240.0 45.0 11:07933.10 0.55 111 81 791.241.27 245 50 1145.0 50.0 11:12937.20 0.50 110 82 791.121.16 250 48 1550.0 55.0 11:17939.49 0.36 112 81 800.810.82 245 56 1455.0 60.0 11:24941.50 0.36 112 82 800.810.82 263 52 1360.0 65.0 11:29944.50 0.55 111 82 801.241.26 240 51 1265.0 70.0 11:34947.50 0.49 110 83 811.111.12 244 53 1170.0 75.0 11:39950.40 0.49 111 84 821.111.13 249 52 1575.0 80.0 11:44953.94 0.44 112 84 821.001.01 250 54 1480.0 85.0 11:50957.00 0.51 112 74 831.161.17 250 55 1385.0 90.0 11:55959.90 0.51 112 75 831.161.17 249 56 1290.0 95.0 12:00963.00 0.45 111 76 841.021.04 248 57 1195.0 100.0 12:05966.20 0.32 111 87 840.730.74 252 58 15100.0 105.0 12:10968.81 0.32 112 87 850.730.74 250 58 14105.0 110.0 12:16971.20 0.32 112 87 850.730.74 250 59 13110.0 115.0 12:21974.20 0.32 112 87 860.730.74 255 59 12115.0 120.0 12:26976.40 0.35 112 87 860.800.81 252 59 11120.0 125.0 12:31979.40 0.36 111 87 860.820.87 247 58 1125.0 12:36981.70Average:69.680.41 110.8 81.6 81.10.920.94 247 55.2 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##89PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2513:15 13:16 0.000 @ 10"LocationWillowsRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)5.0 15:34 15:35 0.000 @10"Source#28Delta ∆H@1.717Date11-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorJPBws (%)2.75# of Ports5Total Run125.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume25.5Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain13.1DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.49Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.16Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.08Md28.82Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.52Act. Flow (cfm)55,335Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 994.80Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)93.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)50,437Moisture % 0.18Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)49,049Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2489Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 5.0 13:20982.27 0.25 114 86 870.530.58 250 68 145.0 10.0 13:25984.40 0.35 114 87 870.740.81 248 64 1310.0 15.0 13:30988.50 0.30 114 87 870.630.65 240 60 1215.0 20.0 13:35990.30 0.30 113 87 870.630.65 240 60 1120.0 25.0 13:40992.00 0.25 113 87 870.530.58 249 60 1525.0 30.0 13:45994.16 0.25 114 87 870.530.58 250 60 1430.0 35.0 13:51996.50 0.25 114 87 870.530.58 250 59 1335.0 40.0 13:56998.50 0.55 114 87 871.161.19 249 58 1240.0 45.0 14:011001.50 0.55 114 87 871.161.19 249 58 1145.0 50.0 14:061005.00 0.48 114 88 881.011.03 251 58 1550.0 55.0 14:111007.85 0.32 115 88 880.670.69 251 63 1455.0 60.0 14:171010.00 0.32 115 88 880.680.69 250 59 1360.0 65.0 14:221012.60 0.52 115 89 881.101.12 254 61 1265.0 70.0 14:271015.60 0.52 115 89 881.101.12 250 60 1170.0 75.0 14:321018.60 0.41 114 89 890.870.88 252 61 1575.0 80.0 14:371020.56 0.40 116 89 890.850.86 251 61 1480.0 85.0 14:451024.50 0.40 115 89 890.850.86 250 60 1385.0 90.0 14:501027.60 0.50 115 89 891.061.08 250 61 1290.0 95.0 14:551030.50 0.50 115 89 901.061.08 252 62 1195.0 100.0 15:001033.50 0.38 114 89 900.810.82 252 60 15100.0 105.0 15:051036.26 0.35 115 89 900.750.75 251 64 14105.0 110.0 15:111038.70 0.35 115 89 900.750.75 252 60 13110.0 115.0 15:161041.90 0.35 115 89 900.750.75 252 61 12115.0 120.0 15:211043.80 0.35 115 89 900.750.75 250 61 11120.0 125.0 15:261046.40 0.35 116 89 910.750.75 251 62 1125.0 15:311048.94Average:66.670.38 114.5 88.1 88.40.810.83 250 60.84 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##72PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJMDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2516:00 16:01 0.000 @ 15"LocationWillowsRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)4.0 18:00 18:01 .000 @ 10"Source#28Delta ∆H@1.717Date11-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorJPBws (%)3.02# of Ports5Total Run100.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume22.1Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain11.1DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.10Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.08Md28.82Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.49Act. Flow (cfm)54,605Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 89.48Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)75.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)49,947Moisture % 1.72Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)48,437Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2492Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 4.0 16:1549.34 0.25 113 93 970.530.53 250 69 144.0 8.0 16:1950.90 0.25 113 93 970.530.53 248 61 138.0 12.0 16:2352.70 0.25 113 93 970.530.53 242 61 1212.0 16.0 16:2754.50 0.25 112 93 970.530.53 241 60 1116.0 20.0 16:3156.10 0.30 112 92 970.640.64 243 57 1520.0 24.0 16:3558.09 0.25 113 93 920.530.53 252 61 1424.0 28.0 16:4059.80 0.25 113 93 950.530.53 258 60 1328.0 32.0 16:4461.60 0.55 113 93 971.171.17 262 59 1232.0 36.0 16:4864.00 0.55 113 93 971.171.17 258 56 1136.0 40.0 16:5266.30 0.52 113 92 971.111.1 250 59 1540.0 44.0 16:5668.93 0.35 112 91 970.740.74 253 58 1444.0 48.0 17:0170.90 0.35 113 92 970.750.74 250 58 1348.0 52.0 17:0572.90 0.55 111 91 971.171.17 253 55 1252.0 56.0 17:0975.30 0.55 112 91 971.171.17 254 56 1156.0 60.0 17:1378.50 0.40 112 92 970.860.85 251 55 1560.0 64.0 17:1780.67 0.40 113 92 970.860.85 252 58 1464.0 68.0 17:2282.90 0.40 113 92 970.860.85 251 58 1368.0 72.0 17:2685.20 0.50 112 91 961.071.06 252 55 1272.0 76.0 17:3087.90 0.50 112 91 961.071.06 252 56 1176.0 80.0 17:3490.20 0.39 113 91 960.840.83 250 57 1580.0 84.0 17:3892.41 0.30 112 91 950.650.64 254 61 1484.0 88.0 17:4394.20 0.30 112 92 960.650.64 253 58 1388.0 92.0 17:4796.00 0.32 112 90 950.690.68 255 58 1292.0 96.0 17:5197.90 0.32 112 90 950.690.68 256 58 1196.0 100.0 17:5599.90 0.32 113 90 950.690.68 258 58 1100.0 17:59101.92Average:52.590.37 112.5 91.8 96.20.800.80 252 #DIV/0! 58.48 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##72PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #19WCSMethod316Total Points2510:20 10:21 0.00@10"LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)5.0 12:40 12:21 0.00@7"Source#29Delta ∆H@1.827Date11-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorDMBws (%)3.01# of Ports5Total Run125.0Filter Number Condensate Volume28.7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain16.4DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.08Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.08Md28.82Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.49Act. Flow (cfm)61,127Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 68.09Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)93.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)56,251Moisture % 3.02Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)54,556Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2492Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 5.0 10:25180.55 0.33 108 79 780.740.73 188 60 245.0 10.0 10:30183.11 0.45 108 80 791.000.99 187 60 2310.0 15.0 10:35185.89 0.45 108 80 791.000.99 187 60 2215.0 20.0 10:40188.70 0.40 108 81 790.890.89 187 58 2120.0 25.0 10:45191.40 0.35 108 81 790.780.78 187 58 2525.0 30.0 10:50193.99 0.35 109 81 800.780.78 188 58 2430.0 35.0 11:00196.50 0.55 109 81 801.231.23 187 60 2335.0 40.0 11:05199.45 0.55 108 82 801.231.23 187 60 2240.0 45.0 11:10202.63 0.55 108 83 801.231.23 188 60 2145.0 50.0 11:15205.78 0.37 108 83 820.830.82 185 58 2550.0 55.0 11:20208.50 0.35 110 83 820.780.78 188 58 2455.0 60.0 11:28211.03 0.55 109 83 821.231.23 187 56 2360.0 65.0 11:32213.53 0.67 109 83 821.501.48 187 56 2265.0 70.0 11:38216.58 0.60 109 85 831.351.33 187 56 2170.0 75.0 11:43219.85 0.37 109 86 850.830.82 187 56 2575.0 80.0 11:48222.64 0.35 109 86 850.790.78 188 57 2480.0 85.0 11:56225.14 0.60 109 87 861.351.33 188 57 2385.0 90.0 12:01228.21 0.67 111 88 861.511.48 186 60 2290.0 95.0 12:06231.55 0.60 110 88 871.351.33 188 60 2195.0 100.0 12:11234.69 0.33 109 88 870.750.78 186 60 25100.0 105.0 12:16237.88 0.35 109 88 860.790.78 186 60 24105.0 110.0 12:24240.15 0.50 111 88 861.131.11 186 60 23110.0 115.0 12:29243.05 0.55 110 88 861.251.23 189 58 22115.0 120.0 12:34246.04 0.55 110 88 861.251.23 189 58 21120.0 125.0 12:39249.18 0.35 110 88 860.800.78 189 60 2125.0 12:44252.31Average:71.760.47 109.0 84.3 82.81.051.05 187 #DIV/0! 58.56 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##90PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #19WCSMethod316Total Points2513:15 13:16 0.000 @ 9"LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)5.0 15:34 15:35 0.000 @7"Source#29Delta ∆H@1.827Date11-Oct-10Time/reading5.0OperatorDMBws (%)2.9# of Ports5Total Run125.0Filter Number Condensate Volume29.1Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain14.5DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.5Actual Dn (in)0.222O2 (%)20.01Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00027CO2 (%)0.08Md28.81Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.50Act. Flow (cfm)60,895Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 294.12Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)93.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)55,638Moisture % 0.69Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)54,022Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2490Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 5.0 13:20252.60 0.35 112 88 880.840.8 249 60 245.0 10.0 13:25255.27 0.40 112 88 880.970.91 246 60 2310.0 15.0 13:30257.95 0.45 112 88 881.091.02 249 58 2215.0 20.0 13:35260.75 0.45 112 88 881.091.02 246 58 2120.0 25.0 13:40263.64 0.35 112 88 880.840.8 242 59 2525.0 30.0 13:45266.52 0.35 114 88 880.840.8 249 60 2430.0 35.0 13:57269.05 0.50 114 88 891.211.14 249 60 2335.0 40.0 14:02271.95 0.55 113 89 891.331.25 249 60 2240.0 45.0 14:07275.04 0.50 112 89 891.211.14 249 57 2145.0 50.0 14:12278.12 0.35 113 90 890.840.8 249 57 2550.0 55.0 14:17280.83 0.35 114 90 890.850.8 249 57 2455.0 60.0 14:26283.30 0.55 114 90 891.331.25 249 62 2360.0 65.0 14:31286.08 0.65 113 90 901.571.48 249 60 2265.0 70.0 14:36289.38 0.60 113 90 901.461.37 249 60 2170.0 75.0 14:41292.69 0.35 113 90 900.850.8 248 59 2575.0 80.0 14:46295.39 0.35 113 90 900.850.8 248 60 2480.0 85.0 14:56298.90 0.65 113 90 901.581.48 247 60 2385.0 90.0 15:01301.89 0.65 115 91 901.581.48 247 61 2290.0 95.0 15:06305.30 0.55 114 91 901.341.25 247 60 2195.0 100.0 15:11308.41 0.35 114 91 900.850.8 246 59 25100.0 105.0 15:16311.23 0.40 114 91 900.980.91 246 59 24105.0 110.0 15:25313.91 0.50 114 90 911.221.14 246 57 23110.0 115.0 15:30316.84 0.50 113 91 911.231.14 246 56 22115.0 120.0 15:35319.83 0.50 113 91 911.231.14 246 56 21120.0 125.0 15:40322.84 0.35 112 92 910.860.8 246 58 2125.0 15:45325.42Average:72.820.46 113.1 89.7 89.41.121.05 247 #DIV/0! 58.92 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##89PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #19WCSMethod316Total Points2516:00 16:01 0.000 @ 7"LocationWillows, CaRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)4.0 18:00 18:01 .000 @ 7"Source#29Delta ∆H@1.827Date11-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorDMBws (%)3.0# of Ports5Total Run100.0Filter Number Condensate Volume25.2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.67Barometric29.71Silica Gel Weight Gain10.8DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.71Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.5Actual Dn (in)0.218O2 (%)20.03Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00026CO2 (%)0.07Md28.81Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.49Act. Flow (cfm)60,249Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 352.04Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)75.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)54,941Moisture % 0.48Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)53,281Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2492Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 4.0 16:20325.98 0.35 114 96 960.790.78 246 61 244.0 8.0 16:24328.03 0.40 114 96 960.900.89 247 61 238.0 12.0 16:28330.18 0.40 114 99 960.900.89 246 60 2212.0 16.0 16:32332.34 0.40 114 96 960.900.89 246 59 2116.0 20.0 16:36334.53 0.35 114 96 960.790.78 246 59 2520.0 24.0 16:40336.57 0.35 114 96 960.790.78 247 58 2424.0 28.0 16:47338.59 0.50 114 96 961.131.11 246 58 2328.0 32.0 16:51341.03 0.50 114 96 961.131.11 246 57 2232.0 36.0 16:55343.55 0.50 114 96 961.131.11 246 58 2136.0 40.0 16:59346.07 0.35 115 95 950.790.78 246 58 2540.0 44.0 17:03349.12 0.35 114 94 950.790.78 247 59 2444.0 48.0 17:10351.14 0.55 114 94 941.241.22 246 59 2348.0 52.0 17:14353.28 0.65 116 94 941.471.44 247 59 2252.0 56.0 17:18356.02 0.55 115 94 941.251.22 248 59 2156.0 60.0 17:22358.55 0.35 114 94 930.790.78 248 59 2560.0 64.0 17:26360.66 0.45 114 94 931.021 248 58 2464.0 68.0 17:33363.02 0.60 114 92 931.361.33 248 58 2368.0 72.0 17:37365.42 0.67 114 95 921.521.48 248 58 2272.0 76.0 17:41368.14 0.55 114 92 921.251.22 248 58 2176.0 80.0 17:45370.71 0.35 114 92 910.800.78 249 58 2580.0 84.0 17:49373.21 0.40 113 92 910.910.89 248 59 2484.0 88.0 17:55375.39 0.40 115 90 900.910.89 248 59 2388.0 92.0 17:59377.54 0.40 115 90 900.920.89 248 60 2292.0 96.0 18:03379.70 0.55 115 90 901.261.22 248 60 2196.0 100.0 18:07382.10 0.35 114 89 890.800.78 248 60 2100.0 18:11384.15Average:58.170.45 114.2 93.9 93.61.021.00 247 #DIV/0! 58.88 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##90PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points250.015 @12"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)3.00.01 @7"Source#30Delta ∆H@1.822Date12-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorDMBws (%)2.92# of Ports5Total Run75.0Filter Number Condensate Volume19.2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.72Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain12.4DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.67Actual Dn (in)0.245O2 (%)20.00Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00033CO2 (%)0.06Md28.81Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.49Act. Flow (cfm)60,173Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column49.26Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)56.3Wet Ref Flow (cfm)55,981Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.4Dry Ref Flow (cfm)54,349Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2491Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 3.0 9:30385.537 0.25 104 75 740.890.81 240 60 243.0 6.0 9:33387.180 0.35 102 75 741.241.14 240 60 236.0 9.0 9:36388.990 0.32 102 75 741.141.05 240 60 229.0 12.0 9:39390.750 0.45 104 77 741.601.47 240 60 2112.0 15.0 9:42392.720 0.33 103 77 751.171.08 240 60 2515.0 18.0 9:49394.450 0.35 103 77 761.241.14 240 60 2418.0 21.0 9:52396.280 0.55 103 77 781.951.8 243 60 2321.0 24.0 9:55398.450 0.67 103 77 782.382.18 243 60 2224.0 27.0 9:58400.950 0.67 104 77 782.382.18 239 60 2127.0 30.0 10:01403.350 0.43 104 79 771.531.41 239 60 2530.0 33.0 10:06405.275 0.25 103 80 760.890.82 239 60 2433.0 36.0 10:09406.850 0.55 103 80 781.961.8 239 60 2336.0 39.0 10:12409.150 0.80 104 80 752.852.62 239 60 2239.0 42.0 10:15411.630 0.67 103 81 802.392.2 239 60 2142.0 45.0 10:18414.030 0.30 103 81 791.070.98 239 60 2545.0 48.0 10:25415.715 0.33 105 82 791.181.08 239 60 2448.0 51.0 10:28417.490 0.57 105 82 802.041.87 236 60 2351.0 54.0 10:31419.750 0.70 104 82 802.512.3 240 60 2254.0 57.0 10:34422.385 0.65 103 82 802.332.14 240 60 2157.0 60.0 10:37424.760 0.35 103 82 811.261.15 241 60 2560.0 63.0 10:45426.577 0.35 106 82 811.261.15 241 60 2463.0 66.0 10:48428.000 0.47 105 82 811.691.54 241 60 2366.0 69.0 10:51430.720 0.47 105 82 811.701.54 241 60 2269.0 72.0 10:54432.890 0.47 105 82 811.701.54 241 60 2172.0 75.0 10:57434.915 0.35 105 82 811.271.15 241 60 275.0436.915Average:51.380.47 103.8 79.5 78.01.661.53 240 #DIV/0! 60 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##90PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2511:30 11:31 0.002 @ 10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)3.0 12:47 11:48 0.002 @10"Source#30Delta ∆H@1.717Date11-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorDMBws (%)3.3# of Ports5Total Run75.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume22.4Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.72Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain11.7DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.67Actual Dn (in)0.244O2 (%)20.00Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00032CO2 (%)0.06Md28.81Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.45Act. Flow (cfm)55,225Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column451.74Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)56.3Wet Ref Flow (cfm)50,972Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)49,281Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2496Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 3.0 11:35437.00 0.35 107 83 831.151.15 240 61 243.0 6.0 11:38438.90 0.45 107 83 831.481.5 240 62 236.0 9.0 11:41441.05 0.45 107 83 831.481.5 240 58 229.0 12.0 11:44443.21 0.48 108 109 831.581.6 240 66 2112.0 15.0 11:47445.49 0.35 109 84 841.151.16 240 59 2515.0 18.0 11:52447.40 0.25 109 83 840.820.85 240 59 2418.0 21.0 11:55449.00 0.35 109 83 851.151.16 243 58 2321.0 24.0 11:58450.90 0.38 109 83 851.251.25 243 58 2224.0 27.0 12:01452.88 0.41 108 85 851.351.35 239 58 2127.0 30.0 12:04454.95 0.38 108 85 851.251.25 239 58 2530.0 33.0 12:09456.95 0.41 107 85 861.351.35 239 58 2433.0 36.0 12:12459.03 0.35 107 86 861.151.16 239 58 2336.0 39.0 12:15460.94 0.32 107 86 861.061.06 239 58 2239.0 42.0 12:18462.75 0.40 108 86 861.321.32 239 58 2142.0 45.0 12:21464.79 0.46 108 86 861.521.52 239 58 2545.0 48.0 12:26466.93 0.43 108 86 861.431.42 239 58 2448.0 51.0 12:29469.00 0.39 108 87 871.291.42 236 58 2351.0 54.0 12:32471.00 0.35 109 87 881.161.16 240 59 2254.0 57.0 12:35472.87 0.34 109 87 881.131.12 240 59 2157.0 60.0 12:38474.72 0.36 109 87 881.201.12 241 59 2560.0 63.0 12:42476.73 0.40 109 87 881.331.12 241 59 2463.0 66.0 12:45478.75 0.37 109 87 881.241.12 241 60 2366.0 69.0 12:48480.69 0.35 109 87 881.171.16 241 60 2269.0 72.0 12:51482.60 0.37 109 87 881.241.22 241 60 2172.0 75.0 12:54484.54 0.35 109 87 871.171.14 241 60 275.0 12:57486.20Average:49.200.38 108.2 86.4 85.81.261.25 240 #DIV/0! 59.16 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##90PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port5Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2514:15 14:16 0.002 @ 10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)3.0 15:56 15:57 .002 @ 10"Source#30Delta ∆H@1.717Date12-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorDMBws (%)3.3# of Ports5Total Run75.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume28.2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.72Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain10.5DGM Y0.985Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.67Actual Dn (in)0.245O2 (%)20.00Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)60.5 X 60.5An (ft^2)0.00033CO2 (%)0.06Md28.81Stack Area (sf)25.42Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.45Act. Flow (cfm)61,517Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)56.3Wet Ref Flow (cfm)56,800Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)54,899Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2496Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.50.0 3.0 14:15488.860 0.30 107 93 931.021.01 243 59 243.0 6.0 14:18490.660 0.40 107 93 941.351.34 243 59 236.0 9.0 14:21492.740 0.50 107 93 941.691.68 244 59 229.0 12.0 14:24494.845 0.51 107 94 941.731.71 244 59 2112.0 15.0 14:27497.200 0.51 107 94 941.731.71 245 59 2515.0 18.0 14:33499.600 0.35 109 92 921.191.17 240 60 2418.0 21.0 14:36501.540 0.38 109 92 921.291.27 240 60 2321.0 24.0 14:39503.550 0.38 109 92 921.291.27 240 60 2224.0 27.0 14:42505.565 0.46 109 92 921.561.54 240 60 2127.0 30.0 14:45507.780 0.58 107 92 921.961.94 240 60 2530.0 33.0 14:54510.270 0.55 107 92 921.871.84 240 60 2433.0 36.0 14:57512.695 0.57 107 92 931.941.91 243 60 2336.0 39.0 15:00515.170 0.58 107 92 931.971.94 243 60 2239.0 42.0 15:03517.650 0.61 107 92 932.082.04 243 60 2142.0 45.0 15:06520.208 0.65 107 92 932.212.18 243 60 2545.0 48.0 15:18522.880 0.31 109 94 941.061.04 234 61 2448.0 51.0 15:21524.705 0.57 109 94 941.951.91 234 61 2351.0 54.0 15:24527.100 0.68 109 94 942.332.28 234 61 2254.0 57.0 15:27529.650 0.65 109 94 942.232.18 234 61 2157.0 60.0 15:30532.120 0.31 107 94 941.061.04 234 61 2560.0 63.0 15:40534.200 0.31 109 96 941.061.1 236 61 2463.0 66.0 15:43536.030 0.50 109 96 941.721.7 236 64 2366.0 69.0 15:46538.300 0.40 109 96 941.381.4 236 63 2269.0 72.0 15:49540.495 0.42 109 96 941.451.5 236 63 2172.0 75.0 15:52542.635 0.44 109 96 941.521.5 236 63 275.0 15:55544.875Average:56.020.48 108.0 93.5 93.31.621.61 239 #DIV/0! 60.56 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##15PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points2411:00 11:01 0.000 @10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)3.0 13:52 13:12 0.001 @10"Source#31Delta ∆H@1.717Date12-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorJPBws (%)4.39# of Ports2Total Run72.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume39.5Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain9.4DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.29Actual Dn (in)0.254O2 (%)19.57Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.96An (ft^2)0.00035CO2 (%)0.06Md28.79Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.32Act. Flow (cfm)28,432Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 49.85Preliminary dP (in H20)0.46Total Vol.(cf)54.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)25,288Moisture % 4.41Preliminary Ts (oF)100Est. Us (ft/s)39.5Dry Ref Flow (cfm)24,177Preliminary Tm (oF)80Theor Dn (in)0.2507Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 3.0 12:38155.078 0.42 128 86 861.541.59 247 65 123.0 6.0 12:41157.260 0.39 130 86 861.431.47 254 55 136.0 9.0 12:44159.420 0.39 130 88 871.431.47 257 52 149.0 12.0 12:47161.563 0.40 130 88 871.471.51 258 52 1512.0 15.0 12:50163.730 0.38 130 89 871.401.44 259 53 1615.0 18.0 12:53165.829 0.39 130 89 871.431.47 258 56 1718.0 21.0 12:56167.930 0.39 131 89 871.431.47 257 60 1821.0 24.0 12:59170.120 0.41 131 89 871.511.55 255 55 1924.0 27.0 13:02172.165 0.41 131 89 871.511.55 257 50 11027.0 30.0 13:05174.345 0.41 131 89 881.511.55 256 50 11130.0 33.0 13:08176.520 0.39 130 90 881.431.47 258 50 11233.0 36.0 13:11178.625 0.39 130 90 881.441.47 258 51 1136.0 39.0 13:15180.711 0.41 131 90 881.511.55 255 52 1239.0 42.0 13:18182.850 0.41 131 90 881.511.55 255 52 1342.0 45.0 13:21185.040 0.41 130 90 881.511.55 256 52 1445.0 48.0 13:24187.229 0.43 131 90 881.591.63 255 52 1548.0 51.0 13:27189.601 0.43 131 90 881.591.63 256 53 1651.0 54.0 13:30191.560 0.45 131 91 881.671.7 257 53 1754.0 57.0 13:33193.830 0.45 131 91 891.671.7 256 53 1857.0 60.0 13:36196.060 0.45 131 91 891.671.7 255 54 1960.0 63.0 13:39198.325 0.45 130 91 891.671.7 256 55 11063.0 66.0 13:42200.580 0.42 130 91 801.561.59 256 55 11166.0 69.0 13:45202.750 0.38 129 92 901.421.44 254 55 11269.0 72.0 13:48204.879 0.38 128 92 901.421.44 255 55 172.0 13:51206.908Average:51.830.41 130.3 89.6 87.51.511.55 256 #DIV/0! 53.75 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe ##57PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12 wcsMethod316Total Points6014:03 14:04 0.0@10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)3.0 15:19 15:20 0.0@10"Source#31Delta ∆H@1.717Date12-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorJPBws (%)4.3# of Ports5Total Run180.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume38.7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.76Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain10.1DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.20Actual Dn (in)0.251O2 (%)19.44Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.96An (ft^2)0.00034CO2 (%)0.39Md28.84Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.37Act. Flow (cfm)29,896Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 241.81Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)135.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)26,574Moisture % 0.94Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)25,420Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 3.0 14:05207.039 0.45 131 91 921.591.62 248 68 123.0 6.0 14:08209.390 0.45 130 92 921.591.62 256 56 136.0 9.0 14:11211.440 0.45 130 93 921.591.62 255 53 149.0 12.0 14:14213.668 0.45 130 92 921.591.62 253 52 1512.0 15.0 14:17215.805 0.48 130 92 921.691.73 256 52 1615.0 18.0 14:20218.070 0.48 131 93 921.691.73 256 53 1718.0 21.0 14:23220.379 0.48 131 94 921.691.93 255 53 1821.0 24.0 14:26222.660 0.50 131 94 931.761.8 253 53 1924.0 27.0 14:29224.925 0.50 130 94 931.761.8 250 53 11027.0 30.0 14:32227.220 0.50 131 93 931.761.8 252 55 11130.0 33.0 14:35229.460 0.39 130 92 921.381.4 252 56 11233.0 36.0 14:38231.540 0.39 130 92 921.381.4 252 56 1136.0 39.0 14:42233.542 0.39 131 92 921.381.4 253 56 1239.0 42.0 14:45235.550 0.39 131 92 921.381.4 256 54 1342.0 45.0 14:48237.630 0.39 131 93 921.381.4 254 54 1445.0 48.0 14:51239.675 0.39 132 93 921.381.4 252 54 1548.0 51.0 14:54241.750 0.39 132 92 921.391.4 252 55 1651.0 54.0 14:57243.871 0.40 132 92 911.421.44 255 55 1754.0 57.0 15:00245.900 0.55 131 92 911.961.98 256 55 1857.0 60.0 15:03248.365 0.55 131 92 911.961.98 257 56 1960.0 63.0 15:06250.765 0.50 131 93 911.791.80 253 56 11063.0 66.0 15:09252.940 0.50 131 93 911.791.80 252 56 11166.0 69.0 15:12255.309 0.50 130 93 911.791.80 252 56 11269.0 72.0 15:15257.632 0.45 130 93 911.611.62 255 56 172.0 15:18259.772Average:52.730.46 130.8 92.6 91.81.611.65 254 #DIV/0! 55.125 1Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.18Probe #15PollutantFormaldehydePoints/Port12Start Finish Pre PostCompanyJohns ManvilleDGM #12WCSMethod316Total Points2415:25 15:26 0.0@10"LocationWillows, CARate (cfm)0.75Run #4Time/pt (min)3.0 16:44 16:45 0.0@10"Source#31Delta ∆H@1.717Date12-Oct-10Time/reading3.0OperatorVPBws (%)5.5# of Ports2Total Run72.0Filter Number Condensate Volume52.4Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.75Barometric29.77Silica Gel Weight Gain10.3DGM Y1.005Pm (in Hg)29.77Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.23Actual Dn (in)0.254O2 (%)19.38Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.96An (ft^2)0.00035CO2 (%)0.39Md28.84Stack Area (sf)12.32Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.24Act. Flow (cfm)28,951Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 292.29Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)54.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)25,686Moisture % 1.00Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)24,264Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 3.0 15:30260.25 0.35 132 91 911.261.32 250 59 123.0 6.0 15:33262.14 0.35 132 91 911.261.32 249 48 136.0 9.0 15:36264.18 0.38 133 92 911.371.44 258 49 149.0 12.0 15:39266.20 0.38 132 92 911.371.44 247 48 1512.0 15.0 15:42268.44 0.38 133 92 911.371.44 249 49 1615.0 18.0 15:45270.53 0.38 133 93 911.371.44 250 50 1718.0 21.0 15:48272.64 0.42 133 93 911.521.59 250 51 1821.0 24.0 15:51274.79 0.53 132 94 921.922 250 52 1924.0 27.0 15:54277.11 0.50 131 93 911.811.89 248 53 11027.0 30.0 15:57279.42 0.50 131 92 911.811.89 245 54 11130.0 33.0 16:00281.83 0.42 130 92 911.521.59 248 56 11233.0 36.0 16:03284.10 0.42 130 93 911.521.59 252 56 1136.0 39.0 16:07286.19 0.42 132 93 921.521.59 245 56 1239.0 42.0 16:10288.40 0.42 132 93 921.521.59 246 57 1342.0 45.0 16:13290.53 0.45 132 93 921.641.7 249 59 1445.0 48.0 16:16292.71 0.45 132 94 921.641.7 249 52 1548.0 51.0 16:19294.95 0.42 132 93 921.531.59 247 51 1651.0 54.0 16:22297.17 0.42 132 94 921.531.59 248 51 1754.0 57.0 16:25299.36 0.42 132 94 921.531.59 247 51 1857.0 60.0 16:28301.55 0.42 132 93 921.541.59 245 52 1960.0 63.0 16:31303.75 0.42 132 93 911.541.59 247 52 11063.0 66.0 16:34306.04 0.38 132 93 921.391.55 248 53 11166.0 69.0 16:37308.07 0.49 131 92 911.801.85 247 53 11269.0 72.0 16:40310.39 0.45 130 92 911.651.7 245 53 172.0 16:43312.68Average:52.440.42 131.8 92.7 91.41.541.61 248 #DIV/0! 52.7083333 1Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

Equipment Calibration

Documents

# APPENDIX E

Laboratory Analytical

ReportsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetone(mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)FilterablePM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)OrganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)InorganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)Run 1130.50.604.7330.90531Run 214ND0.306210.60619Run 3160.50.304.2340.60432Blank:200.500.30ND1.8RDL:10.30.50CorrectedOTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab Results Blank CorrectionJohns-ManvilleWillows, California - Stack 27BTEC job # 10-3990.18Sampling Date: October 18-19, 2010OTM28OTM27AcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight (mg)Run 197 1.9 ND 1.92.2Run 293 2.4 0.30 2.42.7Run 3962.8ND2.83.1Blank98 NDRDL1 0.5 0.30Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Date: October 19, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.18Willows, California - Stack 27Johns-ManvilleCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)FilterRDL(μg)R1Result(μg)R2Result(μg)R3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit (RDL)(μg)R1(μg)R2(μg)R3(μg)MDLusedAntimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.800.80 0.80 0.80<Arsenic 0.47 0.40 17.0 20.0 21.7 0.8016.5 19.5 21.2Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Cadmium ND 0.10 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.200.56 0.53 1.41Chromium 0.92 0.30 1.64 1.64 2.75 0.600.72 0.72 1.83Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.200.20 0.20 0.20<Lead 1.65 0.20 2.12 1.48 3.09 0.400.47 0.40 1.44<Manganese ND 0.75 ND ND ND 1.51.5 1.5 1.5<Nickel 0.94 0.50 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.01.1 1.0 1.1<Selenium ND 1.0 19.5 23.9 25.5 2.019.5 23.9 25.5Johns-ManvilleMethod 29 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Date: October 19, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.18Willows, California - Stack 27CorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]MDLusedRun 18103001.2 0.40.40Run 28103000.9 0.40.40<Run 38803001.20.40.40Blank H2O97 ND 0.05Blank KOH300 0.80 0.20Method 0061 Lab Results Blank CorrectionSampling Date: October 18, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.18Willows, California - Stack 27Johns-ManvilleVolume (mL)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)Run 1320NDND200200Run 2310NDND200200Run 3290NDND200200Blank H20100NDNDBlank H2SO4200 ND NDRDL200200CorrectedMethod 26A Lab Results Blank CorrectionJohns-ManvilleWillows, California - Stack 27BTEC job # 10-3990.18Sampling Date: October 14 & 15, 2010Volume[ml]Formaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]RDLPhenol[μg]RDLFormaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]Phenol[μg]Blank UFDI300ND--Run 1 470 690 294ND6690 29 6Run 2 450 630 274ND6630 27 6Run 3 440 510 334196510 33 19Run 1 550 510 194ND6510 19 6Run 2 500 540 164ND6540 16 6Run 3 470 440 234ND6440 23 6Run 1 430 320 194ND6320 19 6Run 2 480 350 254126350 25 12Run 3 440 360 204ND6360 20 6Run 14704800364ND64800366Run 24404700404ND64700406Run 34605000354ND65000356Method 316 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Date: October 11 & 12, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.18Willows, California - Stack 27Johns-ManvilleStack 28Stack 29Stack 30Stack 31

### Site: JM WILLOWS

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/22



## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1917

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (

2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/17

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/13

Weight of Water

from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/13

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover

pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 1 2 H

V 0 3 1 3 H

V 0 3 1 4 H

V 0 3 1 5 H

V 0 3 1 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14 2010/10/14

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.5 0.5 2327442

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 0.30 2328288

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 20 1 2327445

Weight g 120 170 160 180 0.1 2327902

DCM Weight g 270 190 220 160 0.1 2327899

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.8 33 21 34 0.50 2332125

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 4.7 6.0 4.2 1.0 2327894

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 1 9 H

V 0 3 2 0 H

V 0 3 2 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

COC Number

U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.5 ND 0.5 0.5 2327442

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.60 0.30 0.30 0.30 2328288

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 13 14 16 1 2327445

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0312 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0313 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0314 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0315 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0318 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0319 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0320 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0321 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL

COMMENTS

Sample HV0312-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0313-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0314-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0315-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF

ANALYSES OF

STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0318-01R Normal

HV0319-01R FT

HV0320-01R Normal

HV0321-01R DE/LFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter

material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

FT Filter

torn

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1917

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327442 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/22 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2327894 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 92 % 70

- 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 95 % 70

- 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 2.7 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2332125 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank

matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Site: JM WILLOWS

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1932

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 9 7 H

V 0 3 9 8 H

V 0 4 0 0 H

V 0 4 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 1.9 2.4 2.8 0.5 2327435

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND 0.30 ND 0.30 2328304

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 97 93 96 1 2327436

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 9 7 H

V 0 3 9 8 H

V 0 4 0 0 H

V 0 4 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.47 0.40 17.0 20.0 21.7 0.80 2334727

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.20 2334727

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.92 0.30 1.64 1.64 2.75 0.60 2334727

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.65 0.20 2.12 1.48 3.09 0.40 2334727

Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 0.75 ND ND ND 1.5 2334727

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.94 0.50 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.0 2334727

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 19.5 23.9 25.5 2.0 2334727

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0397 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0398 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0400 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0401 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0397-01R Normal

HV0398-01R LFT

HV0400-01R Normal

HV0401-01R Normal

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x or 5x dilution was required for all samples except HV0283, HV0397 and HV1280, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HV1281.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1932

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327435 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2334727 N_R Matrix Spike Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 98 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 99 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 93 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 95 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 4.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 99 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 96 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 95 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 94 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 0.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 0.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 99 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1932

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2334727 N_R Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 101 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 0.07 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.63, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.65, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 1 (2 of 2)



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80487 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 532 0.1 10/13/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80427 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 531 0.6 20 10/13/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80477 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 436 0.2 10/13/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80431 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 449 0.4 20 10/13/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80488 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 461 0.7 10/14/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80397 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 499 0.4 20 10/14/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80495 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.6 0.5 Blank

80457 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 20 0.5 20 Blank

Variability +- 10% 

## Plant/Source 

# JM Willows 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available 

## (248)-548-8072

### Site: JM WILLOWS

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01

This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8439

Received: 2010/10/20, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/01

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 2 H

O 1 6 0 3 H

O 1 6 0 4 H

O 1 6 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/15 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/14

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 100 200 320 1 2316213

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2316215

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2316215

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 5 H

O 1 6 0 6 H O 1 6 0 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 2010/10/14

COC Number N/A N/A

U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 310 290 2316213 97 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.05 2307267

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2316215 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2316215 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 8 H

O 1 6 0 9 H

O 1 6 0 9 H

O 1 6 1 0 H

O 1 6 1 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/15 2010/10/15

COC Number

U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 300 1 810 810 880 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.8 0.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.4 2307267

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1602 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1603 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1604 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1604 D u p Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1605 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1606 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1607 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1608 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1609 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1609 D u p Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HO1610 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1611 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL COMMENTS

Temperature of samples upon receipt >6°C.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8439

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307267 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1609) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 106 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 105 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 NC % 20

2316215 A_S Matrix Spike

(HO1604) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 101 % 80

- 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 103 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 99 % 90

- 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 101 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6

### Site: JM WILLOWS

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/05



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8493

Received: 2010/10/20, 23:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 26

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Formaldehylde (M316) 13 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316

Final Volume of Impinger 13 N/A 2010/10/23

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) ( 1 ) 13 N/A 2010/10/25 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 5 1 H

O 1 8 5 2 H

O 1 8 5 2 H

O 1 8 5 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

U n i t s RB-H2O-M316 RDL R1-FORM-28-M316 R1-FORM-28-M316 RDL R2-FORM-28-M316 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug ND 7.5 690 690 23 630 11 2307269

Volume ml 300 1 470 1 450 1 2307270

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 6 4 H

O 1 8 6 5 H

O 1 8 6 6 H

O 1 8 6 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

U n i t s R3-FORM-28-M316 RDL R1-FORM-29-M316 RDL R2-FORM-29-M316 RDL R3-FORM-29-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 510 11 510 14 540 13 440 12 2307269

Volume ml 440 1 550 1 500 1 470 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 6 8 H

O 1 8 6 9 H

O 1 8 7 0 H

O 1 8 7 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

U n i t s R1-FORM-30-M316 RDL R2-FORM-30-M316 RDL R3-FORM-30-M316 RDL R2-FORM-31-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 320 11 350 12 360 11 4800 59 2307269

Volume ml 430 1 480 1 440 1 470 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 7 2 H

O 1 8 7 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

U n i t s R3-FORM-31-M316 RDL R4-FORM-31-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 4700 55 5000 58 2307269

Volume ml 440 1 460 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 3 0 H

O 1 8 3 2 H

O 1 8 3 2 H

O 1 8 3 3 H

O 1 8 3 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

U n i t s RB-DI VOA R1-FORM-28-VOA R1-FORM-28-VOA R2-FORM-28-VOA R3-FORM-28-VOA RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Methanol ug ND 29 26 27 33 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 19 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 3 5 H

O 1 8 3 6 H

O 1 8 3 7 H

O 1 8 3 8 H

O 1 8 3 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

U n i t s R1-FORM-29-VOA R2-FORM-29-VOA R3-FORM-29-VOA R1-FORM-30-VOA R2-FORM-30-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 19 16 23 19 25 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 12 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 4 0 H

O 1 8 4 1 H

O 1 8 4 5 H

O 1 8 4 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

U n i t s R3-FORM-30-VOA R2-FORM-31-VOA R3-FORM-31-VOA R4-FORM-31-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 20 36 40 35 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1830 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID RB-DI VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1832 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1832 D u p Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1833 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1834 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1835 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1836 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Page 4 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1837 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1838 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R1-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1839 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1840 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1841 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1845 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1846 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R4-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Page 5 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1851 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID RB-H2O-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1852 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1852 D u p Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HO1854 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1864 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1865 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 6 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1866 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1867 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1868 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R1-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1869 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1870 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1871 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 7 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1872 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1873 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R4-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 8 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HO1830-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1832-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1833-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1834-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1835-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1836-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1837-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1838-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1839-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1840-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1841-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1845-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1846-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 9 of 10

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8493

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307269 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1852) Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 99 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 99 % 91

- 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=7.5 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 0.9 % 20

2307386 LTO Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/10/25 80 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 93 % N/A

Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/10/25 85 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 92 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/10/25 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/10/25 ND, RDL=6 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Methanol 2010/10/25 10.9 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 NC % 50

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 10 of 10