alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Jacob Inbar, President andChief Executive Officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), certifythat:

 

I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.

 

Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, theperiods, presented in the report.

 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

 

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which the periodic report is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and to the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons fulfilling the equivalent function):

 

(i)             allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(ii)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated:  August 20, 2004           |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ Jacob  Inbar                       |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                           |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99(b)

Independent Accountants'Report

The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-1has been conductedby HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 28, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,management's assertion thatthe servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation,successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation,as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 28, 2001, as supplemented,as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005





Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust 2001-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated February 28, 2001, as supplemented.



|/s/ Steve Smith 
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



|/s/ Joan Coppenrath
Joan Coppenrath
Controller
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date | /s/ Craig Peters
Craig Peters
Group Director - Asset Management
HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto FinanceMarch 1, 2005
Date
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50350

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACOBO MOISES GONZALEZ-AMARO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:03-CR-2257-ALL-DB

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jacobo Moises

Gonzalez-Amaro concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed

by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further

review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu

of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 10.22**

**HOME FEDERAL BANKPROMISSORY NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT**
| Modification #5371 |   | Loan #9206756 |
|--------------------|--------|---------------|

 

ThisAgreement is made as of February 14, 2007, between Home Federal Bank having itsoffice at 225 South Main Avenue, Post Office Box 5000, Sioux Falls, SouthDakota 57117-5000 (“Lender”) and Great Plains Ethanol LLC, 27716 462nd Ave. Chancellor, SD 57015 (“Borrower”)

RECITALS:

A.            Lender is the holder of a Promissory Note ofBorrower dated February 28, 2003 payable to the Lender in the originalprincipal amount not to exceed $1,600,000.00 (the “Loan”).

B.            Lender is willing to modify payment terms ofthe Loan evidenced by the Loan Documents in the manner set forth below. Theseproposed changes are requested by and acceptable to Borrower. Borroweracknowledges that the Loan Documents shall remain the legal and bindingobligation of Borrower, endorsers and guarantors, free of any claim, defense oroffset.

Accordingly, in consideration of the premises and other good andvaluable consideration, each paid to the other, the parties agree as follows:

1.             Effective as of, N/A and until the Loan isfully paid or Lender changes the number of basis points or the index, whicheveris the first to occur, the unpaid balance of the Loan shall bear interest at avariable rate of N/A basis points in excess of the N/A (“Index”).  Lender, at its discretion, may change thenumber of basis points or Index upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice toBorrower.

2.             The unpaid principal balance of the Loan andInterest thereon shall be paid in full on or before March 1, 2008.

3.                                       The maximum amount of the Loan is changed toand shall not exceed $780,000.00.

4.             The Loan Documents are amended to the extentnecessary to reflect the changes set forth above.  No other amendments are made to the LoanDocuments.  Except as amended herein, theterms and conditions contained in the Loan Documents, and the Related Documentsdescribed therein, shall continue to govern the relationship of the parties.

----

5.             It is understood and agreed by the partiesthat this Agreement shall not operate as a novation of the Loan Documents orthe Loan.

6.             A Loan Modification Fee of $2,812.50 will becharged. 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto each duly executed this Agreement as of theday and year first above written.
|        |   | HOME FEDERAL BANK        |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | BY:                      | /s/ Terry  Cleberg |   |
|   |   | ITS:                     | Vice President |   |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | BORROWER:                |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | GREAT PLAINS ETHANOL LLC |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | /s/ Darrin Ihnen         |   |
|   |   | DARRIN IHNEN, PRESIDENT  |

 

----
# C_2004240EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 September 2004

(2004/C 240/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2254 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6787 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0484 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5493 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,29 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5769 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,588 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4275 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3672 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 123 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,01 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 833 300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,719 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5648 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5578 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,842 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,076 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 410,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8831 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2254

JPY

Japanese yen

136,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6787

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0484

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5493

ISK

Iceland króna

87,29

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5769

CZK

Czech koruna

31,588

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6623

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4275

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3672

ROL

Romanian leu

41 123

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,01

TRL

Turkish lira

1 833 300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,719

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5648

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5578

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,842

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,076

KRW

South Korean won

1 410,44

ZAR

South African rand

7,8831

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004168EN.01000601.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/6

---

Action brought on 31 March 2004 by Cargo Partner AG against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-123/04)

(2004/C 168/10)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 31 March 2004 by Cargo Partner AG, Fischamend (Austria), represented by M. Wolner, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | vary the contested decision so as to allow registration of the trade mark sought; |
| --- | --- |

—

vary the contested decision so as to allow registration of the trade mark sought;

| — | in the alternative, refer the case back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); and, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, refer the case back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); and,

| — | in any event, award costs to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, award costs to the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark sought: | The word mark CARGO PARTNER — Application No 2697290. |
| --- | --- |
| Goods or services: | Goods and services in Classes 36 (insurance) and 39 (transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangement). |
| Decision contested before the Board of Appeal: | The examiner's partial refusal to register the mark in respect of the transport, packaging and storage services in Class 39. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal. |
| Pleas in law: | The mark is distinctive and therefore registrable. |

Community trade mark sought:

The word mark CARGO PARTNER — Application No 2697290.

Goods or services:

Goods and services in Classes 36 (insurance) and 39 (transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangement).

Decision contested before the Board of Appeal:

The examiner's partial refusal to register the mark in respect of the transport, packaging and storage services in Class 39.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law:

The mark is distinctive and therefore registrable.

---
# C_2004223EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2004

(2004/C 223/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2071 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6782 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1318 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5337 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,74 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,69 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6565 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4269 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4057 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 838 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,145 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 823 400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7446 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5673 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4154 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,863 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0588 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 391,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0182 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2071

JPY

Japanese yen

132,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6782

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1318

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5337

ISK

Iceland króna

87,74

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,69

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6565

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4269

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4057

ROL

Romanian leu

40 838

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,145

TRL

Turkish lira

1 823 400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7446

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5673

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4154

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,863

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0588

KRW

South Korean won

1 391,61

ZAR

South African rand

8,0182

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-86,560-01

EX PARTE LAWRENCE DEMETRIUS SMITH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 08-0306X(A) IN THE 71 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM HARRISON COUNTY

ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

I agree with this Court’s remand order’s determination that applicant has alleged facts that,

“if true, might entitle him to relief.” I, however, do not join this Court’s order because I would

require the habeas court on remand to appoint counsel for applicant upon request if he is indigent,

regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex parte Pointer, 492 S.W.3d 318, 320-21

(Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring). Specifically, in addition to the order’s

current admonition that the appointment of counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon

request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I would include a further admonishment that an indigent

applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the

interests of justice require representation.” See TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 1.051(d). With these

comments, I respectfully concur in this Court’s order.

Filed: April 12, 2017

Do Not Publish
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00210-CR

Daniel Uvalle, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-13-1053-SA, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Daniel Uvalle filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on April 6, 2015. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due in this Court on July 27, 2015. On counsel’s motion, we

extended the deadline for filing the brief by 60 days, making the brief due on September 25, 2015. 

On September 25, 2015, appellant filed a second motion for extension of time, seeking another

60-day extension for a total of 120 days. We granted the extension but ordered that appellant’s brief

must be filed no later than November 24, 2015. We notified appellant’s counsel that no further

extension would be granted and that failure to file the brief by November 24, 2015, would result

in referral of the case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure.
Because appellant’s counsel neither filed a brief nor responded to this Court’s notice,

we abated the cause and remanded it to the trial court for a proceeding in accordance with Rule 38.8. 

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). The district court held a hearing on January 6, 2016, to determine whether

appellant still wishes to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has

abandoned the appeal. Id. The trial court forwarded its findings and recommendations to this Court,

as well as the reporter’s record from the hearing. The trial court found that appellant is indigent and

has not evidenced any desire to abandon this appeal and that counsel has not abandoned this appeal. 

Based on the trial court’s recommendation, we will grant counsel an additional

30 days from the date of this orderto file appellant’s brief. We order counsel to file appellant’s brief

no later than February 24, 2016. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to

show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on January 25, 2016.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland

2
UNCE R. LEflEUR D!Pf'L**f()f~**

11rmfngham dranch**~** 1') 'JIJkan**Pr,:~d** 

# ADEM

\Jabama Department of Environmental**Mana~ement** 1dem.alabama.gov l·l'JO r:oiiSeiHn l),•,rJ. \.il10-.2·1il0 • t'o·,t l}ill•:e t3ox 301.-lfil ',1, 1ntr;omery, ;\laoama liS l.llJ 1hS3 '.)ct) 271 1700 • 1;\X I U4) 271 ('):)() :\Jovcrnher 'J. 20 12 

### CERTIFIED MAIL NO.: 91 7199 9991 7030 3272 5001 \>1s. (}wcndolyn Kt!yes Fleming Regional ,\dministrator 

### I·:PA Region**~**

.\ tlanta Federal Cc:nter 

### 61 Forsyth Street, S.

### W. ;\tlanta, CiA JOJ03-S960 Dear Ms. Fleming: :10BERT

### J. BEN



### AIR PLA.NN1NG**Bl'.'i..~t'\1** 

# LJ

# t/\\**r;:nr~** 

# ................

BFA-REGION .t4 ATLANTA. 04

Pursuant to Section 

### 172 of the Clean Air ;\ct, the Alabama Department 

### of Environmental r'vlanagernent formally -;ubmits for your approval and inclusion into the Alabama State Implementation plan, proposed measures to address the Troy, Alabama, NonattainmenrArea (NAA) for the 

### 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). In accordance with the Clean Air Act, this attainment demonstration documents the State of Alabama's analysis of various control measures and their predicted impact on air quality in the NAA. The analysis results were used to .-;elect a practicable and reasonable control strategy, which should result in the attainment ofthe lead NAA()S. rhis plan was available t()r public comment from September 25 to < ktober 3I, 2012. rhe Clean Air Act requires states to develop implementation plans that provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures as expeditiously as practicable and that provide for attainment of the national primary ambient air quality standards. The purpose of this SIP revision is to fultill these federal requirements. Ifyou need additional information concerning this submittal, please call Chris Howard ofmy staff 

### at(JJ4) 271-7878. Sincerely, ./} I

### (f~\ , { 1{ t**~** _ 

## ,cz·,lc I Ronald W. Gore, Chief Air Division RWG/CH:mmm/bdc**,.:'~catur** Branch**',1ot.ll~o.astal**

I 1: t- _':::.**~~** 1 ' l

# ,

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 2 November 9, 2012

cc: Scott Davis 

### CERTIFIED MAILNO.: 91 7199 9991 7030 3272 4998 Beverly Banister 

### CERTIFIED MAILNO.: 91 7199 9991 7030 3272 4981 Lynorae Benjamin 

### CERTIFIED MAILNO.: 91 7199 9991 7030 3272 4974 File: P-8-152