Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 6017 

1A notation in the form of ‘‘Joint Comment, No. 

43 at p. 1’’ identifies a written comment that DOE 

received and included in the docket of this 

rulemaking. This particular notation refers to a 

comment: (1) In the Joint Comment; (2) in the 

document number 43 of the docket; and (3) on page 

1 of that document. 

The notice provided for the submission 

of written comments by December 22, 

2014. 

On December 22, 2014, DOE received 

a joint comment from the Appliance 

Standards Awareness Project (ASAP), 

Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance 

(NEEA), the American Council for an 

Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), and 

the Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC) (Joint Comment). The full 

comment can be found in Docket No. 

EERE–2010–BT–STD–0043–43. The 

Joint Comment opposed DOE’s 

proposed determination for the 

following reasons: 

1. Energy conservation standards for 

the [400 watt] metal halide 

representative lamp type are technically 

feasible and economically justified, and 

would result in significant energy 

savings (Joint Comment, No. 43 at p. 

1); 1

2. DOE’s analysis fails to properly 

consider the likely consumer responses 

to replacing existing HID lamps (Joint 

Comment, No. 43 at p. 2); and 

3. DOE’s analysis should be based on 

mean lumen output and not on initial 

lumen output (Joint Comment, No. 43 at 

p. 3). 

DOE is reopening the public comment 

period for the October 21, 2014 NOPD 

to allow interested parties to provide 

DOE with comments and data in 

response to the points made in the Joint 

Comment. DOE will consider any 

comments in response to the Joint 

Comment received by midnight of 

March 6, 2015, and deems any 

comments received by that time to be 

timely submitted. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 26, 

2015. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02157 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0164; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NE–02–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca 

S.A. Turboshaft Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2014–19– 

05 that applies to all Turbomeca S.A. 

Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 

1D1, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, 1S1, 2B, 2B1, 2C, 

2C1, 2C2, 2S1, and 2S2 turboshaft 

engines. AD 2014–19–05 requires an 

initial one-time vibration check of the 

engine accessory gearbox (AGB) on 

certain higher risk Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 

model engines and repetitive vibration 

checks for all Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 

engines. Since we issued AD 2014–19– 

05, we determined that a Technical 

Instruction (TI) number and a Test Bed 

Acceptance Test Specifications number 

in the Actions and Compliance and the 

Related Information sections are 

incorrect. This proposed AD would 

correct these numbers. We are 

proposing this AD to prevent failure of 

the engine AGB, which could lead to inflight shutdown and damage to the 

engine, which may result in damage to 

the aircraft. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by April 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 

Tarnos, France; phone: 33 0 5 59 74 40 

00; telex: 570 042; fax: 33 0 5 59 74 45 

15. You may view this service 

information at the FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0164; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information, regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The address for the Docket 

Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7758; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: mark.riley@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0164; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NE–02–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On September 15, 2014, we issued AD 

2014–19–05, Amendment 39–17973 (79 

FR 59091, October 1, 2014), for all 

Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 

1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, 

1S1, 2B, 2B1, 2C, 2C1, 2C2, 2S1, and 

2S2 turboshaft engines. AD 2014–19–05 

requires an initial one-time vibration 

check of the engine AGB on certain 

higher risk Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 model 

engines. AD 2014–19–05 also requires 

repetitive vibration checks of the engine 

AGB for all Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 engines 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
6018 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

at every engine shop visit. AD 2014–19– 

05 resulted from reports of 

uncommanded in-flight shutdowns on 

Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 

engines, following rupture of the 41- 

tooth gear forming part of the 41/23- 

tooth bevel gear located in the engine 

AGB. We issued AD 2014–19–05 to 

prevent failure of the engine AGB, 

which could lead to in-flight shutdown 

and damage to the engine, which may 

result in damage to the aircraft. 

Actions Since AD 2014–19–05 Was 

Issued 

Since we issued AD 2014–19–05, 

Amendment 39–17973 (79 FR 59091, 

October 1, 2014), we determined that a 

TI number and a Test Bed Acceptance 

Test Specifications number in the 

Actions and Compliance and the 

Related Information sections are 

incorrect. This proposed AD would 

correct these numbers. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Turbomeca S.A. 

Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 

292 72 0839, Version B, dated 

November 25, 2013, and MSB No. 292 

72 2849, Version B, dated November 25, 

2013. The service information describes 

procedures for performing vibration 

checks of the engine AGB. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require an 

initial one-time vibration check of the 

engine AGB on certain higher risk Arriel 

1 and Arriel 2 model engines. This AD 

also requires repetitive vibration checks 

of the engine AGB for all Arriel 1 and 

Arriel 2 engines at every engine shop 

visit. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect 1,268 engines installed on 

aircraft of U.S. registry. We also estimate 

that it would take about 4 hours per 

engine to comply with the inspection 

requirement in this proposed AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based 

on these figures, we estimate the cost of 

this proposed AD on U.S. operators to 

be $431,120. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2014–19–05, Amendment 39–17973 (79 

FR 59091, October 1, 2014), and adding 

the following new AD: 

Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0164; Directorate Identifier 2014–NE– 

02–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by April 6, 

2015. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2014–19–05, 

Amendment 39–17973 (79 FR 59091, October 

1, 2014). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all Turbomeca S.A. 

Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 

1E2, 1K1, 1S, 1S1, 2B, 2B1, 2C, 2C1, 2C2, 

2S1, and 2S2 turboshaft engines. 

(d) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

uncommanded in-flight shutdowns on 

Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 engines 

following rupture of the 41-tooth gear 

forming part of the 41/23-tooth bevel gear 

located in the engine accessory gearbox 

(AGB). We are issuing this AD to prevent 

failure of the engine AGB, which could lead 

to in-flight shutdown and damage to the 

engine, which may result in damage to the 

aircraft. 

(e) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(1) For all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1B, 1D, 

1D1, 2B, and 2B1 turboshaft engines, perform 

a one-time vibration check of the AGB 41/23- 

tooth bevel gear meshing within 32 months 

of the effective date of this AD, as follows: 

(i) For all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1B, 1D, 

and 1D1 engines, except those engines with 

an AGB installed with a serial number (S/N) 

listed in Figure 1 of Turbomeca S.A. 

Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 292 

72 0839, Version B, dated November 25, 

2013, use paragraphs 6.A. through 6.C. of 

Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 0839, 

Version B, dated November 25, 2013, to 

perform the vibration check. Turbomeca S.A. 

MSB No. 292 72 0839 refers to Turbomeca 

S.A. Arriel 1 Technical Instruction (TI) No. 

292 72 0839, Version E, dated February 20, 

2014, and Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1 TI No. 

292 72 0840, Version A, dated November 29, 

2013, which you must also use to do the 

vibration check. 

(ii) The reporting requirements in 

paragraphs 6.A.(1)(c), 6.A.(2)(b), and 

6.B.(1)(c) and the requirement to return 

module M01 in paragraph 6.B.(2)(b)2 of 

Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 0839, 

Version B, dated November 25, 2013, are not 

required by this AD. 

(iii) For all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B and 

2B1engines, except those engines with an 

AGB installed with an S/N listed in Figure 

1 of Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 2849, 

Version B, dated November 25, 2013, use 

paragraphs 6.A. through 6.C. of Turbomeca 

S.A. MSB No. 292 72 2849, Version B, dated 

November 25, 2013, to perform the vibration 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 6019 

check. Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 2849 

refers to Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2 TI No. 292 

72 2849, Version E, dated February 20, 2014, 

and Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2 TI No. 292 72 

2850, Version A, dated November 29, 2013, 

which you must also use to do the vibration 

check. 

(iv) The reporting requirements in 

paragraphs 6.A.(1)(c), 6.A.(2)(b), and 

6.B.(1)(c), and the requirement to return 

module M01 in paragraph 6.B.(2)(b)2 of 

Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 2849, 

Version B, dated November 25, 2013, are not 

required by this AD. 

(2) For all affected Turbomeca S.A. 

engines, during each engine shop visit after 

the effective date of this AD, perform a 

vibration check of the AGB 41/23-tooth bevel 

gear meshing. 

(3) If the AGB does not pass the vibration 

check required by paragraphs (e)(1) or (e)(2) 

of this AD, replace the AGB with a part 

eligible for installation. 

(f) Credit for Previous Action 

If you performed a vibration check of the 

AGB before the effective date of this AD 

using Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 0839, 

Version A, dated September 9, 2013; or MSB 

No. 292 72 2849, Version A, dated September 

9, 2013, or during an engine shop visit per 

paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, you met the 

initial inspection requirement of paragraph 

(e)(1) of this AD. 

(g) Definition 

For the purpose of this AD, an ‘‘engine 

shop visit’’ is the induction of an engine into 

the shop for maintenance involving the 

separation of pairs of major mating engine 

flanges. The separation of engine flanges 

solely for the purpose of transportation 

without subsequent engine maintenance does 

not constitute an engine shop visit. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. You may email your 

request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, 

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7758; fax: 781–238–7199; 

email: mark.riley@faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency AD 2014–0036, dated 

February 11, 2014, for related information. 

You may examine the MCAI in the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://www.

regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA2014-0164-0003. 

(3) Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 72 0839, 

Version B, dated November 25, 2013; and 

MSB No. 292 72 2849, Version B, dated 

November 25, 2013, provide guidance on 

performing the one-time vibration check. 

Arriel 1 TI No. 292 72 0839, Version E, dated 

February 2014; Arriel 1 TI No. 292 72 0840, 

Version A, dated November 29, 2013; Arriel 

2 TI No. 292 72 2849, Version E, dated 

February 20, 2014; and Arriel 2 TI No. 292 

72 2850, Version A, dated November 29, 

2013, provide detailed instructions on 

performing the one-time vibration check for 

Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 engines as indicated. 

Turbomeca Engine Test Bed Acceptance Test 

Specifications CCT No. 0292009400, Version 

T; CCT No. 0292019400, Version R; CCT No. 

0292019690, Version I; CCT No. 0292019530, 

Version K; CCT No. 0292019610, Version K; 

CCT No. 0292029450, Version J; CCT No. 

0292029490, Version I; CCT No. 0292029440, 

Version I; CCT No. 0292029480, Version K; 

CCT No. 0292029520, Version H; CCT No. 

0292029410, Version L; CCT No. 

0292029530, Version H; or Turbomeca ID No. 

383952; or Turbomeca RTD No. X 292 65 327 

2, provide information on performing a 

vibration check during an engine shop visit. 

These service documents, which are not 

incorporated by reference in this AD, can be 

obtained from Turbomeca S.A. using the 

contact information in paragraph (i)(4) of this 

proposed AD. 

(4) For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 

40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33 0 5 59 74 

40 00; telex: 570 042; fax: 33 0 5 59 74 45 

15. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 

12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 

MA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

January 26, 2015. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02082 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0789; FRL–9922–52– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the 

Allentown Nonattainment Area to 

Attainment for the 2006 24-Hour Fine 

Particulate Matter Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s 

request to redesignate to attainment the 

Allentown nonattainment area 

(Allentown Area or Area) for the 2006 

24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS). EPA is also proposing to 

determine that the Allentown Area 

continues to attain the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition, EPA is 

proposing to approve as a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) the associated maintenance plan to 

show maintenance of the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 for the 

Area. The maintenance plan includes 

the 2017 and 2025 PM2.5 and nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) mobile vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEBs) for the Area for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, which EPA 

is proposing to approve for 

transportation conformity purposes. 

Finally, EPA is proposing to approve as 

a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP the 

2007 base year emissions inventory for 

the Area for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS. This rulemaking action to 

propose approval of the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation request and 

associated maintenance plan for the 

Allentown Area is based on EPA’s 

determination that Pennsylvania has 

met the criteria for redesignation to 

attainment specified in the Clean Air 

Act (CAA) for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before March 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2014–0789 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: powers.marilyn@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0789 

Marilyn Powers, Acting Associate 

Director, Office of Air Program 

Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2014– 

0789. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS