alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5532-5533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested

[[Page 5533]]

persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 26, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., Mount Pleasant, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of DCB Financial Corp., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Preston State Bank, both in Dallas, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 28, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-01902 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
1

Memo to: EPA - RTP Date: May 21, 2013

From: LAN Associates, Inc. Subject: Felman Furnace 2 Manganese

The following table provides a summary of the manganese mass emission rates and particulate matter 

(PM) mass emission rates measured at the outlet of the Furnace #2 baghouse at the Felman facility 

ranging from July, 2010, to March, 2013:

Table 1 – Summary of Manganese Data from Furnace #2

The average manganese percentage in the PM1from the most recent testing appears to be significantly 

higher than that from the previous tests. This result appears to be largely due to the variance in the 

particulate data (i.e., [Mn+] 5x higher than prior average, but mass emissions rate only 2x higher). 

Given the inherent variability in operating conditions, raw material mixes, test conditions, etc., the 

average manganese mass emission rate from all recent testing should be used.

JG

3811-07-M-Felman Furnace 2 Manganese Summary-130521

 

1

Obtained by calculating the ratio of the manganese mass emission rate to the PM mass emission rate

Test Date(s) Run 1 Mn Run 2 Mn Run 3 Mn Average Mn Average PM Average Mn %

lb/hr %

July 9-10, 2010 0.095 0.061 0.283 0.146 4.64 3.2

April 26, 2011 0.334 0.541 0.209 0.361 5.42 6.7

August 14-17, 2012 0.116 0.123 0.060 0.099 1.76 5.6

March 20, 2013 0.957 0.281 0.356 0.531 1.28 41.4

Average of All Data 0.285 3.28 8.69

lb/hr
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report - Fiscal Year 2011 (NUREG-1542, Volume 17 and Supplement 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 17 (PDF - 25.60 MB)  | Chairman's Message (Video)
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 17, Supplement 1 (PDF - 2.79 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: November 2011

Division of Planning and Budget Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Fiscal Year 2011 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) presents the agency's program performance and financial management information. The PAR gives the President, Congress, and the American public the opportunity to assess the agency's performance in achieving its mission and the stewardship of its resources.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

SILVERSTAR HOLINGS LTD - 10Q                               Filing Date: 11/14/03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                         Name: /s/ Clive Kabatznik
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Clive Kabatznik
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Date: November 14, 2003

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              21
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Interagency Steering Committee on Radiation Standards (ISCORS) (NUREG-1707)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Public Comment Analysis and Adjudication: Supplement 3 to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies" (NUREG-2112)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2112 (PDF - 1.09 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2011**Date Published:**October 2011

**Prepared by:** J. Kratchman, R. Sullivan

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This study is a thorough analysis and adjudication of official public comment submissions for Supplement 3, Revision 1, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies", draft report for comment issued March 2010, to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," issued November 1980. The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) also developed a comment tracking and analysis process to gain further analytical insights into the nature of stakeholder comments. Comments on the draft version of Supplement 3 were solicited in the Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 44) published March 8, 2010. The NRC and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), held a series of public meetings during the comment period to facilitate stakeholder understanding of the document.

The comment analysis approach developed in this study was used in analyzing comments on Supplement 3; however, this methodology can be adapted for other comment collections and reflects the NRC’s desire to gain enhanced insights into stakeholder concerns.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

OPTICAL DEVICES, LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2016-2012, 2016-2013, 2016-2014

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

IPR2014-01445, IPR2014-01446, IPR2014-01447.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, 

San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

MARK D. FOWLER, ALAN LIMBACH, CARRIE LYNNE 

WILLIAMSON, BRENT YAMASHITA, East Palo Alto, CA. 

STEPHEN JON TYTRAN, Scenera Research LLC, Portsmouth, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

THEODOSIOS THOMAS. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 15, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### Lerum, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Davidson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *L. C. Gunderson*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Ela, Christianson & Ela*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Amit Munshi, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EPIRUS Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 29, 2016 | /s/   Amit Munshi                       |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        | Amit   Munshi                           |
|                        | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                        | *(Principal Executive Officer)*         |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VitaCube Systems Holdings, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary Pat O'Halloran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/MARY PAT O'HALLORANMary Pat O'Halloran
Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

March 3,
2005

---



QuickLinks
# CANCELED: Vermont State Technical Committee Meeting

      Colchester State Office,              VT    

Vermont

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  CANCELED: Vermont State Technical Committee Meeting 

**NOTE: This State Technical Committee meeting has been cancelled.**

State Technical Committee meeting for the Vermont Natural Resources Conservation Service.

## Registration

*This meeting is open to the public, but registration is required.  To register or request special accommodation to ensure full participation in the meeting, contact Angela Hyldburg, 802-951-6796 x227, angela.hyldburg@usda.gov.  In-person seating is limited to 40 people.  Attendance will be honored on a first-come, first-serve basis through RSVP.  NRCS respectfully requests that each organization limit in-person attendance to 1-2 people from each organization to allow for the greatest variety of representation from various organizations.*
No. 90-608.

#### Kucharek et al. *v.*Hanaway, Attorney General of Wisconsin.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of Children’s Legal Foundation, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
HomeRadioactive WasteWaste Incidental to ReprocessingDisposal Process

# Guidance and Communications Related to Waste Incidental to Reprocessing

On this page:
        - Guidance
        - Communications

## Guidance

Web (HTML) versions of some guidance documents are available in our NUREG-Series Document Collection. Some guidance documents are also available in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

**Guidance documents** that may prove useful to stakeholders include the following resources:
        - Current Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm Facility (INL INTEC TFF) Monitoring Plan
        - Current Savannah River Site Saltstone Disposal Facility (SRS SDF) Monitoring Plan
        - Current Savannah River Site Tank Farms (SRS TFs) Monitoring Plan
        - NDAA WIR Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR)  – Revision 6 – final version	           - Summary of NDAA Section 3116(a) Consultation Major Activities (Appendix B)
          - NDAA Section 3116(b) Roles and Responsibilities (Section 1.2)
          - NDAA Section 3116(b) Monitoring Process (Appendix A)
          - Summary of NDAA Section 3116(b) Monitoring Major Activities (Appendix C) 
        - NUREG-1854 , "NRC Staff Guidance Document for Activities Related to U.S. Department of Energy Waste Determinations"

## Communications

NRC and DOE communicate during the consultation process and, if the DOE site is under Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, then also during the monitoring process. Those communications include the following: meeting summaries, teleconference call summaries, onsite observation visit reports (only during monitoring), technical review reports, and technical evaluation reports. You can find the publicly available communications in ADAMS.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Guidance and Communications
          - Monitoring of Disposal Actions for WIR
          - WIR Locations

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Exhibit 32

 

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2018, as amended with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (jointly, the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  April 1, 2019

 

|                         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Lecil E. Cole |   |
| Lecil E. Cole                |   |
| Chairman of the Board and    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer      |   |

 

| . John                                           |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  B. John Lindeman                  |   |
| B. John Lindeman                                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and

Corporate Secretary |   |

 

----
#### Edward Buckley vs. William L. Morse. Grace Eliza Buckley, Pro Ami *vs.*William L. Morse.

Androscoggin County.

Decided February 14, 1922.

“These are two action tried together and involving the same facts. One by a father for loss of service of his daughter and for expense incurred as a result of her injury by the defendant. The other by a daughter pro ami for damages as a result of injury caused by the defendant. The claim of the plaintiffs was that the defendant’s agent and servant so negligently operated the defendant’s *578motor truck that it struck the sled on which the plaintiff’s daughter was sitting or by which she was standing and thus caused the. injury. The occurrence took place January 8, 1920.”

*George C. Wing and George C. Wing, Jr.,*for plaintiffs.

*Frank A. Morey,*for defendant.

The verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in each case, and both cases are brought to the Law Court upon the usual motion. The controversy as the case comes to the Law Court is confined to a single issue. The defense is an alibi. The issue as stated by the defendant in his brief is as follows:

> “The fixing of this time is important, because it will be brought to mind that the defendant denies that his truck was there at that locality at that time and was not the truck, if any, injured the girl, and we do not believe that she received her injury in any such way as is alleged in the writ.”

The question is not whether the truck was, as a matter of absolute fact, at the locality, but does the evidence preponderate in favor of the plaintiff’s contention in proof of that fact. That was a question of fact not for the court but for the jury.

*We*are of the opinion from an examination of the evidence that the jury did have substantial evidence upon which to found their verdict if they believed it; and the question of credibility was also one addressed to them and not to this court. Whatever we might have found, were we sitting as triers of fact, we have no legal right under the law and constitution of this State to substitute our judgment for that'of the jury when they have-acted within the scope and meaning of the law. 'Nor do we feel authorized to disturb either verdict on account of the amount. Motion overruled in each case.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7703

WILLIAM M. HUGGINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BONNIE BOYETTE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-73-1-5-MU) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 9, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William M. Huggins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Huggins v. Boyette , No. CA-01-73-1-5-MU (W.D.N.C., Aug.20, 2001, & Sept. 13, 2001). We also deny Huggins’ motion to dismiss the indictment. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0564

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including September 28, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2023

08/22/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0564
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bo-Yung Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2016



By:

/s/ BO-YUNG CHEN


Name:

Bo-Yung ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




1
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented therein.
 Date:
May 7, 2007
    
    /s/ Steve Tirado

Steve TiradoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christie B. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ Christie B. KellyChristie B. KellyExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the General PartnerDate: August 13, 2010


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.