alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Shou-Kang Chen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 8 , 2007



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName: Shou-Kang ChenTitle: Chief Financial Officer
ConservaƟon PracƟce Standard Overview 

December 2012 

Hedgerow planting involves establishment of 

dense vegetation in a linear design to achieve 

a natural resource conservation purpose. 

PracƟce InformaƟon 

Hedgerows are established using woody 

plants or perennial bunch grasses that 

produce erect stems of at least 3 feet in height 

that will persist over winter. Conservation 

benefits include but are not limited to: 

 improved wildlife habitat, and 

 reduced drift of airborne dust, chemicals, 

and odors. 

Hedgerows also help to screen noise and 

improve landscape appearance. 

Hedgerows containing a mixture of native 

shrubs and small trees provide the greatest 

environmental benefits. It is important to 

consider the amount of shading a hedgerow 

will provide at maturity. Shading and root 

growth may impact growth of adjacent plants 

and microclimate. 

Common Associated PracƟces 

Hedgerow Planting (422) is commonly applied 

with conservation practices such as Tree/

Shrub Establishment (612) and Upland 

Wildlife Habitat Management (645). 

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office. 

Hedgerow PlanƟng (422) 

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OFOFFICER

OF AMLCOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 USC§ 1350

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officerof AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(a)                                   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(b)                                  Information contained in such Form10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2007      |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| /s/ Jacob Inbar               |   |
| By: Jacob Inbar,              |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
#### The State *vs.*John Hogg.

From New-IIanover.

Jury. A Commissioner of Navigation is not exempt from serving as a Tales Juror.

The Defendant was returned as a Talisman, to serve o n the Jury during the day on which he was returned. He came into court, and stated that he was a Commissioner of Navigation for the Port of Wilmington, and was exempt from serving on Juries by the act of 1807", ch. 51, sec. S, and prayed a discharge. The court held, that he was not exempt from serviugas a Tales Juror : And it was submitted to this court to decide, whether he was exempt.

Rui'FiN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We have looked into the act of 1807, ch. 53, and sundry others of a similar *nature;*and the result is that we think the exemptions therein meant,, are from services as Jurors of the original Panncl. Such exemptions are not intended as privileges or a compensation to the party, unless where it is expressly so stated, as in the act of 1794, ch. 4, in favor of Patrols. The purpose of the Legislature is to forward and promote the public advantage, by leaving Officers, Physicians and others, to exercise their employments without interruption. So far therefore as serving on a Jury does notinterfere with their public avocations, they aré still liable to be called on for that ser*320vice. Butin as much as no one can be summoned as a a Talesman, excepta by-stander at the court, no inconvenience can result to the community from compelling a pe,.son to serve in that capacity *;*for the very fact of iiis being a by-stander proves, that lie has not then any official or professional engagements, which require his atten-iioti. If, however, such duties should occur, after he is summoned, it is in the power and has been the practice of thee courts, to excuse a Juror upon a proper case.
# C_2004118EN.01004101.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Third Chamber)

of 2 April 2004

in Case T-231/02: Piero Gonnelli and Associazione Italiana Frantoiani Oleari (AIFO) v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Natural or legal persons - Acts affecting them individually - Regulation - Marketing norms for olive oil - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 118/88)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-231/02: Piero Gonnelli and Associazione Italiana Frantoiani Oleari (AIFO), established in Rome (Italy), represented by U. Scuro, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Cattabriga and C. Loggi) – application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 of 13 June 2002 on marketing standards for olive oil (OJ 2002 L 155, p. 27) – the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | the application is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the application is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | the applicants are to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

the applicants are to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 24.11.01

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1,932
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    38,002
<PP&E>                                              16,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      72,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               27,024
<BONDS>                                             22,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                                12
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        72,375
<SALES>                                              1,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,527
<CGS>                                                9,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (15,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (15,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (15,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.33)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Philip
      McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
      Communications, Inc.








Date:
                February 16, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Philip M. McDermottName:
            Philip
                M. McDermottTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer








32
#### Rusch, Respondent, vs. Wald, Appellant.

*October 15*

November *11, 1930.*

*463For the appellant there was a brief by *Paul, Ebert, Paul & Knoeller*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Herman M. Knoeller.*

*Michael J. Durm, Jr.,*of Milwaukee, for .the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

The appellant in support of his demurrer urges the misrepresentation complained of to be one of law as it relates to an ordinance and therefore not the basis of an action. This general rule is not applicable to the situation disclosed by the allegations of the complaint. The purpose and method of licensing real-estate brokers to do business and limiting this field to those so duly licensed creates a relation between the broker and the public dealing with him which places on Him an obligation commensurate with the advantage he has in the general knowledge that he *464is designated as one having special understanding and information concerning the things affecting his particular vocation. If a broker deceives and misleads one into making a contract to the broker’s or his principal’s undue advantage and does so under such circumstances that trust and confidence are reposed on the one side and the influence of his recognized and licensed position and the impression of superior knowledge accompanying it are exercised on the other, the customer has a cause of action for rescission or damages, providing, of course, the customer has acted within proper limitations as to the exercise of prudence and diligence. Whether or not, under the allegations of this complaint, the plaintiff is lacking in diligence and proper care in relying upon the broker’s statement and in failing to make an independent inquiry, is a question of fact which is not to be resolved against her upon the demurrer. In *Genske v.*Jensen, 188 Wis. 17, at p. 19, 205 N. W. 548, it was said: “A purchaser may also be justified in refusing to perform because of the existence of a valid building or other restriction imposed by statute or ordinance, or by authorized municipal authorities, or by an existing charge against the property by reason of violation of such a restriction.”

“It is not . . . universally true that a misrepresentation of the law is not binding upon the party who made it. . . . Where one who has had superior means of information professes a knowledge of the law, and thereby obtains an unconscionable advantage of another who is ignorant and has not been in a situation to become informed, the injured party is entitled to relief as well as if the misrepresentation had been concerning matter of fact.” 1 Bigelow, Fraud, p. 488. See, also, *Kyle v. Fehley,*81 Wis. 67, 71, 51 N. W. 257. The complaint states a cause of action.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the Company)
dated March 16, 2005 containing the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Dennis J. Pauls, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. By:
    /s/ Dennis J. PaulsDennis J. PaulsChief Financial Officer March 16, 2005
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsGovernment Information Locator Service (GILS)

# NRC Information Digest

**Originator:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Division of Planning, Budget, and Analysis

**Abstract:**The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Information Digest (NUREG-1350) provides a summary of information about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC's regulatory responsibilities, NRC licensed activities, and general information on domestic and worldwide nuclear energy. The digest, published annually, is a compilation of nuclear- and NRC-related data and is designed to serve as a quick reference to major facts about the agency and the industry it regulates. Information on generating capacity and average capacity factor for operating U.S. commercial nuclear power reactors is obtained from monthly operating reports that are submitted directly to the NRC by the licensee. This information is reviewed by the NRC for consistency only and no independent validation and/or verification is performed.

**Purpose:**The publication of the NRC Information Digest is in compliance with the agency goal to be more responsive to the public and maintain an awareness within the NRC staff of efforts expended by the agency to achieve its mission. This publication is not in response to any direct legislative or regulatory requirement other than the overall mandate of the government to provide efficient public access to information.

**Agency Program:**Not Applicable

**Availability:**See Distributors

**Available Linkage:**Information Digest (NUREG-1350)

**Available Linkage Type:**image/gif

**General Access Constraints:**No Access Constraints

**Documentation:**Not Applicable

**Use Constraints:**No Use Constraints

**Contact Name:**Division of Planning, Budget, and Analysis

**Contact Organization:** Office of the Chief Financial Officer

**Contact Street Address:**Mail Stop T-9 D16

**Contact City:**Washington

**Contact State:**DC

**Contact Zip Code:**20555-0001

**Contact Country:**USA

**Contact Network Address:**jaj1@nrc.gov

**Contact Hours of Service:**9 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

**Contact Telephone:**301-415-5703

**Contact Fax:**301-415-5386

**Record Source:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

**Record Source Unit:**Office of the Chief Financial Officer

**Sources of Data:**Not Applicable

**Control Identifier:**USNRC007

**Date of Last Modification:**20010430

**Record Review Date:**20010430

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 02, 2020
Order entered September 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00854-CV

HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Appellant

V.

AXIS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-00267-D

ORDER

We GRANT the September 19, 2013 unopposed motion of nonresident attorney, Phillip 

L. Free, Jr., for admission pro hac vice. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Phillip L. 

Free, Jr. as counsel pro hac vice.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
No. 82-1073.

#### Young *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORME 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          30,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,291
<INVENTORY>                                     43,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,642
<PP&E>                                          22,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,608
<BONDS>                                             71
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,577
<SALES>                                        171,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,660
<CGS>                                          105,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,312
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>