6468 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

5846, 5851); National Environmental Policy 

Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear Waste 

Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141, 

148 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153, 10155, 

10157, 10161, 10168); Government 

Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 

U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act of 2005, 

Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 788 (2005). 

Section 72.44(g) also issued under Nuclear 

Waste Policy Act secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d) 

(42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)). 

Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic 

Energy Act sec. 189 (42 U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear 

Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154). 

Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear 

Waste Policy Act sec. 145(g) (42 U.S.C. 

10165(g)). 

Subpart J also issued under Nuclear Waste 

Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h) (42 U.S.C. 

10137(a), 10161(h)). 

Subpart K also issued under Nuclear Waste 

Policy Act sec. 218(a) (42 U.S.C. 10198). 

■ 2. In § 72.214, Certificate of 

Compliance No. 1014 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel 

storage casks. 

* * * * * 

Certificate Number: 1014. 

Initial Certificate Effective Date: May 

31, 2000. 

Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: 

July 15, 2002. 

Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: 

June 7, 2005. 

Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: 

May 29, 2007. 

Amendment Number 4 Effective Date: 

January 8, 2008. 

Amendment Number 5 Effective Date: 

July 14, 2008. 

Amendment Number 6 Effective Date: 

August 17, 2009. 

Amendment Number 7 Effective Date: 

December 28, 2009. 

Amendment Number 8 Effective Date: 

May 2, 2012, as corrected on November 

16, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML12213A170), superseded by 

Amendment 8, Revision 1 on April 21, 

2015. 

Amendment Number 8, Revision No. 

1, Effective Date: April 21, 2015. 

Amendment Number 9 Effective Date: 

March 11, 2014. 

SAR Submitted by: Holtec 

International. 

SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis 

Report for the HI–STORM 100 Cask 

System. 

Docket Number: 72–1014. 

Certificate Expiration Date: May 31, 

2020. 

Model Number: HI–STORM 100. 

* * * * * 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26 day 

of January. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mark A. Satorius, 

Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02309 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION 

12 CFR Parts 1005 and 1026 

[Docket No. CFPB–2014–0031] 

RIN 3170–AA22 

Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic 

Fund Transfer Act (Regulation E) and 

the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2014– 

27286, appearing on pages 77102 

through 77335 in the issue of Tuesday, 

December 23, 2014, make the following 

corrections: 

1. On pages 77103 to 77104, in 

footnote 1, ‘‘https://.frbservices.org/

files/communications/pdf/general/

2013_fed_res_paymt_study_detailed_

rpt.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://

www.frbservices.org/files/

communications/pdf/general/2013_fed_

res_paymt_study_detailed_rpt.pdf’’. 

2. On page 77105, in footnote 19, 

‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/

householdsurvey/report.pdf’’ should 

read ‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/

householdsurvey/2013report.pdf’’. 

3. On page 77107, in footnote 36, 

‘‘http://.com/blackhawkcomments-onparent-company-safeways-spinoffannouncement/’’ should read ‘‘http:// 

blackhawknetwork.com/blackhawkcomments-on-parent-companysafeways-spin-off-announcement/’’. 

4. On page 77109, in footnote 43, 

‘‘http://.consumerfinance.gov/f/201309_

cfpb_payroll-cardbulletin.pdf’’ should 

read ‘‘http://www.consumerfinance.gov/ 

f/201309_cfpb_payroll-cardbulletin.pdf’’. 

5. On page 77120, in the third 

column, in the third paragraph, on the 

fifth and sixth line, ‘‘et se’’ should read 

‘‘et seq.’’. 

6. On page 77131, in footnote 206, 

‘‘https://www.consumer.ftc.gov//0182- 

gift-cards’’ should read ‘‘https://

www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0182- 

gift-cards’’. 

7. On page 77141, in footnote 222, 

‘‘http://www.federalreserve.gov/

publications/es/2014_Prepaid_Cards_

Final.pdf’’ should read ‘‘http://

www.federalreserve.gov/publications/

files/2014_Prepaid_Cards_Final.pdf’’. 

8. On page 77154, in footnote 258, 

‘‘http://www.nielsen.com/content//

corporate/us/en/reportsdownloads/

2014%20Reports/the-digitalconsumerreport-feb-2014.pdf’’ should 

read ‘‘http://www.nielsen.com/content/

dam/corporate/us/en/reportsdownloads/2014%20Reports/thedigital-consumer-report-feb-2014.pdf’’. 

9. On the same page, in the same 

footnote, ‘‘http://

www.Federalreserve.gov//mobile-devicereport-201203.pdf’’ should read ‘‘http:// 

www.Federalreserve.gov/econresdata/

mobile-device-report-201203.pdf’’. 

10. On the same page, in footnote 259, 

in the fifth line, ‘‘100 a.m.’’ should read 

‘‘100 Am.’’. 

11. On page 77179, in footnote 296, 

‘‘http://

cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/_

Prepaid_Industry_Scorecard_2014.pdf’’ 

should read ‘‘http://

cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/CFSI_

Prepaid_Industry_Scorecard_2014.pdf’’. 

12. On page 77227, in footnote 365, 

on the ninth line, ‘‘1026.4(c)(4)).’’ 

should read ‘‘1026.4(C)(4).)’’. 

13. On page 77262, in footnote 430, 

‘‘http://.pewtrusts.org/en/research-andanalysis/reports/2014/02/06/consumerscontinue-to-load-up-on-prepaid-cards’’ 

should read ‘‘http://www.pewtrusts.org/ 

en/research-and-analysis/reports/2014/

02/06/consumers-continue-to-load-upon-prepaid-cards’’. 

PART 1005 [Corrected] 

Supplement I to Part 1005 [Corrected] 

14. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 

page 77315, in the first column, in the 

first paragraph, on the eleventh line, 

‘‘2(a)(15))–2)’’ should read ‘‘2(a)(15)– 

2)’’. 

15. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 

the same page, in the same column, in 

the second paragraph, on the forty-first 

line, ‘‘2(a)(15))–2.i.F’’ should read 

‘‘2(a)(15)–2.i.F’’. 

16. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 

the same page, in the third column, in 

the second paragraph, on the first line, 

‘‘12(a))–’’ should read ‘‘12(a)–’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2014–27286 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 73 

[Docket No. FDA–2015–C–0245] 

Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color 

Additive Petition 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 6469 

1The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act is Title II of 

Division L of Public Law 113–73, approved January 

17, 2014. 

ACTION: Notice of petition. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or we) is 

announcing that we have filed a 

petition, submitted by Signature Brands, 

LLC, proposing that the color additive 

regulations be amended to provide for 

the safe use of mica-based pearlescent 

pigments in egg decorating kits for 

coloring shell eggs. 

DATES: The color additive petition was 

filed on December 22, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety 

and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food 

and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint 

Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740– 

3835, 240–402–1309. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 

section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 

379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice that we 

have filed a color additive petition (CAP 

5C0301), submitted by Signature 

Brands, LLC, c/o Keller and Heckman, 

LLP, 1001 G Street NW., Suite 500 West, 

Washington, DC 20001. The petition 

proposes to amend the color additive 

regulations in § 73.350 Mica-based 

pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350), 

to provide for the safe use of mica-based 

pearlescent pigments in egg decorating 

kits for coloring shell eggs. 

We have determined under 21 CFR 

25.32(r) that this action is of a type that 

does not individually or cumulatively 

have a significant effect on the human 

environment. Therefore, neither an 

environmental assessment nor an 

environmental impact statement is 

required. 

Dated: January 30, 2015. 

Dennis M. Keefe, 

Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, 

Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02239 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 570 

[Docket No. FR–5767–N–02] 

RIN 2506–AC35 

Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: 

Announcement of Proposed Fee To 

Cover Credit Subsidy Costs and 

Solicitation of Comment 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Community Planning and 

Development, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces and 

solicits public comment on the fee that 

HUD proposes to collect from borrowers 

of loans guaranteed under the HUD’s 

Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program 

(Section 108 Program) for the purpose of 

covering the credit subsidy costs of 

operating the program. Elsewhere in 

today’s Federal Register, HUD is 

publishing a proposed rule that would 

amend its regulations for the Section 

108 Program to permit HUD to collect a 

fee for the Section 108 Program. 

DATES: Comment Due Date: March 9, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposed rule to the Regulations 

Division, Office of General Counsel, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 

10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500. 

Communications must refer to the above 

docket number and title. There are two 

methods for submitting public 

comments. All submissions must refer 

to the above docket number and title. 

1. Submission of Comments by Mail. 

Comments may be submitted by mail to 

the Regulations Division, Office of 

General Counsel, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, 451 

7th Street SW., Room 10276, 

Washington, DC 20410–0500. 

2. Electronic Submission of 

Comments. Interested persons may 

submit comments electronically through 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly 

encourages commenters to submit 

comments electronically. Electronic 

submission of comments allows the 

commenter maximum time to prepare 

and submit a comment, ensures timely 

receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to 

make them immediately available to the 

public. Comments submitted 

electronically through the 

www.regulations.gov Web site can be 

viewed by other commenters and 

interested members of the public. 

Commenters should follow the 

instructions provided on that site to 

submit comments electronically. 

Note: To receive consideration as public 

comments, comments must be submitted 

through one of the two methods specified 

above. Again, all submissions must refer to 

the docket number and title of the notice. 

No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile 

(FAX) comments are not acceptable. 

Public Inspection of Public 

Comments. All properly submitted 

comments and communications 

submitted to HUD will be available for 

public inspection and copying between 

8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the 

above address. Due to security measures 

at the HUD Headquarters building, an 

appointment to review the public 

comments must be scheduled in 

advance by calling the Regulations 

Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a 

toll-free number). Individuals with 

speech or hearing impairments may 

access this number via TTY by calling 

the Federal Relay Service at 800–877– 

8339. Copies of all comments submitted 

are available for inspection and 

downloading at www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Webster, Director, Financial 

Management Division, Office of Block 

Grant Assistance, Office of Community 

Planning and Development, Department 

of Housing and Urban Development, 

451 7th Street SW., Room 7180, 

Washington, DC 20410; telephone 

number 202–708–1871 (this is not a tollfree number). Individuals with speech 

or hearing impairments may access this 

number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877– 

8339. FAX inquiries (but not comments) 

may be sent to Mr. Webster at 202–708– 

1798 (this is not a toll-free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

HUD’s proposed rule, published 

elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, 

describes the current Congressional 

funding status of the Section 108 

Program. HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 

Appropriations Act 1 authorized HUD in 

FY 2014 to impose a fee to eliminate the 

need for credit subsidy appropriations. 

As discussed in more detail in the 

preamble to the proposed rule, 

imposition of a fee, as statutorily 

authorized, will permit the Section 108 

guaranteed loan financing to remain 

available. 

II. Proposed 2015 Fee: 2.42 Percent of 

the Principal Obligation of the Loan 

As described in the proposed rule, 

when determining the appropriate level 

of fee to charge, HUD took into 

consideration the amount required to 

fully offset the credit subsidy cost to the 

Federal Government associated with 

making a loan guarantee. Credit subsidy 

cost calculations incorporate 

assumptions based on: (i) Data on 

default frequency for municipal debt 

where such debt is comparable to loans 

in the Section 108 loan portfolio; (ii) 

data on recovery rates on collateral 

security for comparable municipal debt; 

(iii) the expected composition of the 

Section 108 portfolio by end users of the 

guaranteed loan funds (e.g., third party 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS