alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                               HINES HORTICULTURE

                           CERITIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Claudia M. Pieropan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the4 Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that Exhibit 99.2:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirement section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained In the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   By:  /s/ Claudia M. Pieropan
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Claudia M. Pieropan
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

November 14, 2002
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Exempt Distribution Licenses (NUREG-1556, Volume 8, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 8, Revision 1 (PDF – 2.63 MB)
        - Guidance for the Proposed Rule "Items Containing Byproduct Material Incidental to Production" (PDF – 170 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2018**Date Published:** June 2018

**Prepared by:**J.B. CarricoC. MattsenR. StruckmeyerK. WagnerS. Xu

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for exempt distribution licenses. In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 06, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,626
<SECURITIES>                                         6
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       157
<INVENTORY>                                      5,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,756
<PP&E>                                           4,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,723
<SALES>                                          8,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,546
<CGS>                                            2,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,589
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
# West - Conservation Delivery Units (CDU)

North Dakota State Office220 East Rosser AvenueBismarckND58501

701-530-2000

North Dakota State OfficeBismarckND58501

North Dakota

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  North Dakota 
-  West - Conservation Delivery Units (CDU) 

NRCS North Dakota - West - Conservation Delivery Units (CDU)s

### *Find Your Local Service Center*

**Badlands:**Beach, Dickinson, and Killdeer**Cannonball River:**Carson, Mandan, Selfridge, and Ft. Yates**Cedar Creek:** Bowman, Hettinger, and Mott**Central Sands:**Rugby and Towner**Lake Sakakawea:** Beulah, Center, Garrison, and Turtle Lake**Little Missouri:** Stanley, Watford City, and Williston**Mouse River:**Bowbells, Crosby, Minot and Mohall**Turtle Mountains:** Bottineau and Rolla

##   West - Conservation Delivery Units (CDU)
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Contracts

### Filter by Document Type

 All 

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Contracts

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
CRIMINAL NO. 209426

209428

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1

Plaintiff §

VS. § AND PROBATE COURT OF

BELANDA FAYE PRUITT §

Defendant § BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

CLERK’S NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL

Defendant’s N ame: BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Cause No.: 209426 and 209428

Style of Cause: The State of Texas vs. BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Court: COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1

Judge: Jerri Lee Mills

Appellant: BELANDA FAYE PRUITT

Appellant ’s Attorney: AZUWUIKE OKORAFOR

Appellant’s Attorney’s Address: 9250 UNITY 570752 HOUSTON TX 77257

Appellee: The State of Texas

Appellee’s Attorney: JERRI YENNE

Appellee’s Attorney’s Address: 111 EAST LOCUST, SUITE 408, ANGLETON, TX 77515

Offense: POSS CS PG 3 < 28G , MA and THEFT PROP >=$50<$500, MB

Date of Judgment: 06/08/2015

Amount of Appeal Bond: NONE

Punishment: 209426

- 180 Days jail credit 1 day, $359 court costs

- DL suspended 180 days

209428

- 180 Days jail credit 1 day , $319 court costs

In Jail

— Yes or No? Yes

Date Motion for New Trial filed: NONE

Date of Notice of Appeal: 06/05/2015

Co urt Reporter: Sherri Stadter

Assigned: First Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Mailed to Court of Appeals: 7/1/2015
*October 9, 1928.*

#### Guardianship of Zeitz.

For the appellant: *Henry A. Gunderson*of Portage.

For the respondent: *Grady, Farnsworth & Walker*of -Portage.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
#### Jessie Landon JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21493.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 1965.

Nelson Coffin, Columbus, Ga., for appellant.

Sampson M. Culpepper, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a conviction for violation of the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act. The appellant first came in contact with the law in this transaction when he was stopped in the act of speeding and reckless driving by a city policeman in Columbus, Georgia. The complaint here is of the admission in evidence of the appellant’s response to a question about his identity and a request to see his driver’s license. The question and request were of the routine nature that have come to be expected when an automobile driver is stopped in connection with a traffic violation, whether he *701gets a ticket or not. At the time of the arrest and the conversation complained of, the officer neither knew nor had reason to believe that the automobile was stolen. We have carefully considered the record and have come to the conclusion that the evidence was admissible under the circumstances of this case.

No reversible error appears, and the judgment is affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking Documents

# Rulemaking Dockets

subscribe to page updates
This page provides links to the Regulations.gov website.

This government-wide, on-line database includes NRC's public dockets for its rulemaking actions. The dockets include publicly-available documents such as NRC-issued Federal Register Notices, supporting documents, public comments, and other related documents. Click on the docket number shown in the table to access a particular docket. Once you are in the docket, you may sign up to receive an email notification when particular documents are placed in the docket.

You can submit comments electronically by clicking on the "Comment" icon and accessing the Regulations.gov Public Comment and Submission Form. For more information on Regulations.gov see the user tips on http://www.regulations.gov.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 19, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Rulemaking Dockets
          - Petition  for Rulemaking Dockets
          - Unified Agenda and Regulatory Plan
          - Rulemaking Activities  by Fiscal Year
          - Rulemaking Highlights

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 19, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 12/31/97 and Consolidated Statement of 
Operations for the nine months ended 12/31/97 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,749
<SECURITIES>                                     3,527
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                       516
<INVENTORY>                                         74
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,919
<PP&E>                                          19,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,709
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,933)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,318
<SALES>                                          8,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,522
<CGS>                                            2,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,513)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.59)
        


</TABLE>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 10 June 2004

in Case C-333/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 98/50/EC - Transfer of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees' rights)

(2004/C 190/05)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-333/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M.-J. Jonczy ) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) - application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/50/EC of 29 June 1998 amending Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses (OJ 1998 L 201, p. 88) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive - the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, acting for the President of the Third Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 June 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Preliminary, Qualitative Human Reliability Analysis For Spent Fuel Handling (NUREG/CR-7017, SAND2010-8464P)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7017 (PDF – 2.25 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2011**Date Published:** February 2012

**Prepared by:** Jeffrey D. Brewer1 Paul J. Amico2 Susan E. Cooper3 Stacey M. L. Hendrickson1

1 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185 Operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy

2 SAIC Abingdon, MD 21009

3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington, DC 20555-0001

Susan E. Cooper, NRC Project Manager Susan E. Cooper, NRC Technical Lead

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 NRC Job Code: N6026

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides material that was originally generated as an interim letter report and that presented a preliminary, qualitative human reliability analysis (HRA) to examine, in a generic manner, how human performance of dry cask storage operations (DCSOs) could plausibly lead to radiological consequences that impact the public and the environment. This material is released in a NUREG/CR format to facilitate dissemination of human failure events that examine, in a preliminary fashion, the misloading of spent fuel into a cask. This report includes the investigation of cask drop scenarios as well as other DCSO human performance aspects. It builds upon previous analyses and subject matter expert interviews to improve understanding of human performance issues that may arise in DCSOs. The scenarios and examinations represent a snap-shot in time and are preliminary to the qualitative HRA of cask drops provided in NUREG/CR-7016 [29]. This report demonstrates that process descriptions of varying levels of detail, when carefully reviewed in light of state-of-the-art understandings of human performance, can enable identification of key operational errors and vulnerabilities that may contribute to errors. It is anticipated that the preliminary, qualitative HRA of DCSOs in this report will enhance the ability to carry out a detailed, plant-specific qualitative HRA of DCSOs.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 90-5872 (A-338).

#### Hope *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of mandate, addressed to Justice Marshall and referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Agrichemical Handling Facility, Nutrient Management, Waste Storage Facility, Waste Transfer, Waste Treatment, Waste Treatment Lagoon, Waste Utilization

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JENNIFER CABALLERO

,

Appellant,

v.

SANJIV VIG

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 033

- CV

Appeal from the

388 th D istrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014DCM6244 )

O R D E R

On July 3, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ joint request to mediate this appeal. The

order included a requirement that the parties file a motion to reestablish the appellate timetable in

the event mediation was unsuccessful. Neither party filed a motion, but Appellant filed a letter

advising the Court that med iation was unsuccessful. We have construed the letter as a motion to

reestablish the appellate timetable. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief is due 30 days

from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of October , 201 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          33,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,264
<INVENTORY>                                     33,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,319
<PP&E>                                          17,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,485
<BONDS>                                            109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,061
<SALES>                                        150,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,195
<CGS>                                           86,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>