alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004262EN.01002701.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/27

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 July 2004

in Case T-338/03: Eridania Sadam and Others v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector - Price regime - Regionalisation - Deficit areas - Classification of Italy - Marketing year 2003/2004 - Regulation No 1158/2003 - Action for annulment - Natural and legal persons - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 262/52)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-338/03: Eridania Sadam SpA, established in Bologna (Italy), Italia Zuccheri SpA, established in Bologna (Italy), Zuccherificio del Molise SpA, established in Termoli (Italy), CO. PRO. B — Cooperativa Produttori Bieticoli a rl, established in Minerbio, (Italy), SFIR — Società Fondiaria Industriale Romagnola SpA, established in Cesana (Italy), represented by G. Pittalis, I. Vigliotti, G.M. Roberti, P. Ziotti and A. Franchi, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: L. Visaggio, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by the Council of the European Union (Agent: F. Ruggeri Laderchi) — application for annulment of Article 1(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1158/2003 of 30 June 2003 fixing the derived intervention prices for white sugar for the 2003/04 marketing year (OJ 2003 L 162, p. 24) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, M.Vilaras and I. Wiszniewska-Bialecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to give a decision on the applications to intervene by Azienda Agricola Palazzina ss. and Others, Associazione Nazionale Bieticoltori, Consorzio Nazionale Bieticoltori and Associazione Bieticoltori Italiani. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to give a decision on the applications to intervene by Azienda Agricola Palazzina ss. and Others, Associazione Nazionale Bieticoltori, Consorzio Nazionale Bieticoltori and Associazione Bieticoltori Italiani.

| 3. | The applicants are to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The applicants are to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission.

| 4. | The Council is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Council is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 289 of 29.11.2003.

1

---
IMC Mortgage Company                      phone 813-932-2211
3450 Buschwood Park Drive                   fax 813-932-8257
Suite 250                                 800-776-2211
Tampa, FL 33618




As of and for the year ended  December  31, 1996,  IMC Mortgage  Company and
Subsidiaries  has  complied  in  all  material  respects  with  the  minimum
servicing  standards  set  forth  in the  Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of
America's Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage  Bankers.  As of
and for this same  period,  IMC  Mortgage  Company and  Subsidiaries  had in
effect a  fidelity  bond and errors  and  omissions  policy in the amount of
$7,000,000.



                                    /s/ Thomas G. Middleton
                                    Thomas G. Middleton, President and
                                    Chief Operating Officer
 

                                    /s/ Stuart D. Marvin
                                       Stuart D.Marvin, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2004251EN.01002201.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/22

---

Action brought on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

(Case T-262/04)

(2004/C 251/40)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A., established in Clichy (France), represented by Michel-Paul Escande, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2004 (Case R 468/2003-4), in so far as it decided that Community trade mark application No 1 738 392 should be refused on the grounds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation No 40/94, since BIC has shown that the conditions for the application of that article were not satisfied in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2004 (Case R 468/2003-4), in so far as it decided that Community trade mark application No 1 738 392 should be refused on the grounds laid down in Article 7 of Regulation No 40/94, since BIC has shown that the conditions for the application of that article were not satisfied in the present case;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Community trade mark applied for: | Three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a lighter. |
| --- | --- |
| Goods or services: | Goods in Class 34 (smoker's articles, lighters) — application No 1 738 392. |
| Decision contested before the Board of Appeal: | Refusal to register by the examiner. |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed. |
| Pleas in law: | The applicant has shown that the shape of the lighter in respect of which the application for registration as a Community trade mark was made is widely recognised by consumers as belonging to it.
  The applicant has established that the shape of the BIC lighter had acquired a distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. |

Community trade mark applied for:

Three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a lighter.

Goods or services:

Goods in Class 34 (smoker's articles, lighters) — application No 1 738 392.

Decision contested before the Board of Appeal:

Refusal to register by the examiner.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law:

The applicant has shown that the shape of the lighter in respect of which the application for registration as a Community trade mark was made is widely recognised by consumers as belonging to it.

The applicant has established that the shape of the BIC lighter had acquired a distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

---
July 2022

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Feed Management (Code 592) 

Manipulating and controlling the quantity and quality of

available nutrients, feedstuffs, ingredients, or additives fed

to livestock and poultry. 

Practice Information 

Feed management is used on livestock and poultry

operations with a whole farm nutrient imbalance,

wheremore nutrients are imported to the farm than are

exported and utilized by crops on the farm, or there is a

significant accumulation of nutrients in the soil due to the application of manure without a land base

large enough to allow nutrients to be applied at rates recommended by soil test and utilized by crops

in the rotation. This practice is also implemented when diets are not analyzed and balanced, or when

seeking to improve nutrient use efficiencies, reduce manure pathogens, and/or reduce air emissions. 

The purpose of the practice is to supply the quantity of available nutrients required by livestock and

poultry for maintenance, production, and reproduction, while reducing the quantity of nutrients—

especially nitrogen and phosphorus—excreted in manure by minimizing the overfeeding of these and

other nutrients, thereby improving net-farm income by feeding nutrients more efficiently. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Feed Management (Code 592) is commonly applied

with NRCS CPS Nutrient Management (Code 590). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2018

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
NEMS is a model of U.S. energy economy developed and maintained by the

US Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE). NEMS is used to produce the Annual Energy Outlook, a reference publication that provides detailed forecasts of the energy economy from the current year to 2040. DOE first developed NEMS in the 1980s, and the model has undergone frequent updates and expansion since. DOE uses the modeling system extensively to produce issue reports, legislative analyses, and respond to Congressional inquiries. US EPA docketed two 2014 National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) files that EPA modified in order to use NEMS to estimate the national energy system impacts of the Proposed New Source Performance Standards. These codes are part of the larger set of source codes and input files that constitute NEMS. Interested parties should contact the US Energy Information for more information on NEMS or obtaining the complete source code.

The files are: 1. wllow48_docket.txt (input file for the Oil and Gas Supply Module) 2. ngitm_docket.f (part of the Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module) For more detail, the reader should consult Section 7 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis which is also available in the Docket.
<PAGE> 1
                                                              EXHIBIT 23

                 Consent of Independent Auditors
                 _______________________________

The Board of Directors
Aetna Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(No. 333-07167 on Form S-3, No. 333-07169 on Form S-3, No. 33-52819 and 
No. 33-52819-01 on Form S-3, No. 333-08427 on Form S-8 and No. 333-08429 
on Form S-8 and No. 333-08431 on Form S-8) of Aetna Inc. or its 
Subsidiaries of our reports dated February 4, 1997, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of Aetna Inc. and Subsidiaries as of 
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of 
income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, 
which reports appear in or are incorporated by reference in the December 
31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Aetna Inc.




                            By  /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                    _____________________
                                       (Signature)
                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
February 28, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **ZEOLITE MINING CORPORATION** (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Wang Hanquing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of October, 2004.

 
/s/ Wang Hanquing 
Wang Hanquing 
Chief Executive Officer
# L_2016052EN.01003601.xml

| 27.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2265 of 7 December 2015 opening and providing for the management of autonomous Union tariff quotas for certain fishery products for the period 2016-2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 322 of 8 December 2015
  )

On page 8, Annex, entry No 4 concerning Order No 09.2760:

for:

| ‘09.2760 | ex 0303 66 11 | 10 | Hake (Merluccius spp. excluding Merluccius merluccius, Urophycis spp.) and pink cusk-eel (Genypterus blacodes and Genypterus capensis), frozen, for processing (1) (2) | 15 000 | 0 % | 1.1.2016–31.12.2018’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ex 0303 66 12 | 10 |
| ex 0303 66 13 | 10 |
| ex 0303 66 19 | 11 |
| ex 0303 89 70 | 91 |
| 10 |
| ex 0303 89 90 | 30 |

‘09.2760

ex 0303 66 11

10

Hake (Merluccius spp. excluding Merluccius merluccius, Urophycis spp.) and pink cusk-eel (Genypterus blacodes and Genypterus capensis), frozen, for processing (1) (2)

15 000

0 %

1.1.2016–31.12.2018’,

ex 0303 66 12

10

ex 0303 66 13

10

ex 0303 66 19

11

ex 0303 89 70

91

10

ex 0303 89 90

30

read:

| ‘09.2760 | ex 0303 66 11 | 10 | Hake (Merluccius spp. excluding Merluccius merluccius, Urophycis spp.) and pink cusk-eel (Genypterus blacodes and Genypterus capensis), frozen, for processing (1) (2) | 15 000 | 0 % | 1.1.2016–31.12.2018’; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ex 0303 66 12 | 10 |
| ex 0303 66 13 | 10 |
| ex 0303 66 19 | 11 |
| 91 |
| ex 0303 89 70 | 10 |
| ex 0303 89 90 | 30 |

‘09.2760

ex 0303 66 11

10

Hake (Merluccius spp. excluding Merluccius merluccius, Urophycis spp.) and pink cusk-eel (Genypterus blacodes and Genypterus capensis), frozen, for processing (1) (2)

15 000

0 %

1.1.2016–31.12.2018’;

ex 0303 66 12

10

ex 0303 66 13

10

ex 0303 66 19

11

91

ex 0303 89 70

10

ex 0303 89 90

30

on page 9, Annex, entry No 4 concerning Order No 09.2786, column headed ‘CN code’:

for:

‘
  ex 0307 49 59

ex 0307 99 11
  ’,

read:

‘
  ex 0307 49 59

ex 0307 99 11

ex 0307 99 17
  ’;

on page 11, Annex, footnote (3):

for:

| ‘(3) | Products under CN codes 0306 16 99 (TARIC subdivisions 20 and 30), 0306 26 90 (TARIC subdivisions 12, 14, 92 and 93), 1605 21 90 (TARIC subdivisions 45 and 62), 1605 29 00 (TARIC subdivisions 50 and 55), 0306 17 92 (TARIC subdivision 20), 0306 27 99 (TARIC subdivision 30), 0306 17 99 (TARIC subdivision 10) and 0306 27 99 (TARIC subdivision 20) shall, notwithstanding footnote (2), qualify (...).’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(3)

read:

| ‘(3) | Products under CN codes 0306 16 99 (TARIC subdivisions 20 and 30), 0306 26 90 (TARIC subdivisions 12, 14, 92 and 93), 1605 21 90 (TARIC subdivisions 45, 55 and 62), 1605 29 00 (TARIC subdivisions 50, 55 and 60), 0306 17 92 (TARIC subdivision 20), 0306 27 99 (TARIC subdivision 30), 0306 17 99 (TARIC subdivision 10) and 0306 27 99 (TARIC subdivision 20) shall, notwithstanding footnote (2), qualify (...).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(3)

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                             SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

                                       OF

                                    GUARANTOR

     THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE dated as of March 15, 2001, is delivered
pursuant to Section 10.04 of the Indenture dated as of September 25, 1997 (as
heretofore or hereafter modified and supplemented and in effect from time to
time, the "Indenture") among LAMAR MEDIA CORP., a Delaware corporation, certain
of its subsidiaries ("Guarantors") and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a
Massachusetts banking corporation, as Trustee ("Trustee") (all terms used herein
without definition having the meanings ascribed to them in the Indenture).

     The undersigned hereby agree that:

     1. The undersigned is a Guarantor under the Indenture with all of the
rights and obligations of Guarantors thereunder.

     2. The undersigned hereby grants, ratifies and confirms the guarantee
provided for by Article Ten of the Indenture to guarantee unconditionally,
jointly and severally with the other Guarantors, to each Holder of a Note
authenticated and delivered by the Trustee, and to the Trustee on behalf of such
Holder, the due and punctual payment of the principal of (and premium, if any)
and interest on such Note when and as the same shall become due and payable.

     3. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the representations
and warranties set forth in the Indenture, to the extent relating to the
undersigned as Guarantor, are correct on and as of the date hereof.

     4. All notices, requests and other communications provided for in the
Indenture should be delivered to the undersigned at the address specified in
Section 12.02 of the Indenture.

     5. A counterpart of this Supplemental Indenture may be attached to any
counterpart of the Indenture.

     6. This Supplemental Indenture shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

<PAGE>   2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Supplemental Indenture
to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

                      Guarantor:

                      Lamar Hardy Outdoor Advertising, Inc.


                      By: /s/ Keith A. Istre
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          Keith A. Istre
                          Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Attest:

By: /s/ James R. McIlwain
    ----------------------------
    James R. McIlwain, Secretary

Accepted:

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST
    COMPANY, as Trustee

By: /s/ Andrew L. Sciorz
    ----------------------------
Title: Assistant Vice President
       -------------------------

                                       2
<PAGE>   3

                        ADDITIONAL SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS

Lamar G&H Outdoor Advertising, L.L.C.

Superior Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Custom Leasing Realty, Inc.

Arkansas Outdoor Advertising Co.

Outdoor Marketing Systems, Inc.

Outdoor Marketing Systems, L.L.C.

Able Outdoor, Inc.
CAUSE NO. 03-14-00560-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

_____________________

CHRISTOPHER NEWBERRY

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

____________________

Cause No. C1CR-14-209349, Travis County, Texas, County Court #5, Honorable,

Nancy Hohengarten, presiding

____________________

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, CHRISTOPHER NEWBERRY, appellant, pursuant to U.S.Const.,

Amends. 5 & 14, Tex.Const., Art. I, Secs. 13 & 19, and T.R.A.P., not limited to Rules

4.1, 10.5, 38.6 and 38.9, and moves the Court to extend the time for filing appellant’s

brief THIRTY (30) days to April 15, 2015, and shows:

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

On or about August 7, 2014, on plea of not guilty, a jury convicted appellant of driving

while intoxicated, a class B misdemeanor. The court assessed sentence of 120 days

Travis County jail, no fine. Motion for New Trial apparently was timely filed August 28,

2014. Notice of Appeal was filed prematurely on August 28, 2014, and an Amended

Notice of Appeal was filed October 14, 2015 (correcting the defendant’s name in the body

of the Notice). The reporter's record was filed December 16, 2014.

II. ONE PRIOR EXTENSIONS.

Appellant has received no extensions of time to file his brief.

III. TIME OF MOTION.

The brief was due March 16, 2015. This motion is filed by mailing within 15 days

thereof.

IV. REASONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00560-CR

4683514

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/29/2015 2:28:23 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
Appellant requests for an extension of time based on the following:

1. Counsel is presently working on the brief in the appeal of Cause No. 03-14-00193,

Martin Lopez Montejo v. The State of Texas.

2. In the last 30 days, counsel represented some 45 clients with some 86 cases

(approximately 37/71 appointed and/or jail requiring prompt disposition) and disposed of

some 17 defendants and 27 cases (approximately 10/17 etc..

3. Therefore, asks this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing brief THIRTY (30)

days to April 15, 2015, so appellant will be given a full and meaningful appeal and

accorded due process and due course of law, his right to appeal and effective assistance of

counsel.

WHEREFORE, appellant prays this Court grant this motion and extend the time for filing

his brief THIRTY (30) days to April 15, 2015.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

 /s/ Christopher P. Morgan

 Christopher P. Morgan

 State Bar No. 14435325

3009 N. IH 35

 Austin, Texas 78722

(512) 472-9717 // FAX: 472-9798

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I, Christopher P. Morgan, certify a true and correct

copy of this Motion was served on the Office of the County Attorney for Travis County,

Texas on March 30, 2015, by mail to P.O.Box 1748, Austin, TX 78767 .

/s/ Christopher P. Morgan
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 7, 2022

No. 04-22-00438-CR

Lester Hildago AGUILAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10697CR

Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due by September 6, 2022, and on that day, the court 

reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension until October 10, 2022 to file 

the record. Under Rule 35.3, this court is responsible for ensuring the appellate record is timely 

filed, and any extension we grant “must not exceed 30 days in an ordinary or restricted appeal.”

See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly, we grant in part the court reporter’s request for an 

extension, and we order the court reporter to file the record by October 6, 2022. If by that date, 

the court reporter needs an additional extension, she is advised she must file a second request for 

an extension.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court