alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: Cyber Retail.com, LLC

From: Bodyguard Records.com, Inc.

Re: Internet Distribution Agreement

Cyber Retail.com and Bodyguard Records.com are parties to an Internet
Distribution Agreement, dated January 17, 2000, The Parties have mutually agreed
to make said Agreement null and void, effective immediately. Both Parties
understand that said Agreement is now officially dissolved and terminated.

Said Agreement was and is non-exclusive and was not intended to, nor did it ever
cover digitally downloaded music sales via the Internet. Both parties part ways
amicably and wish the other much success.

               AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


/s/Edward Fox
-------------
Edward Fox - CEO


/s/ Gene Foley
--------------
Gene Foley - CEO
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donald Witmer, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ DONALD WITMERDonald Witmer Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2006




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 24, 2023


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Trade Wind
Communication Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Kevin Levine, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Trade Wind Communications
Limited;

2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o(d));
and

3. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 20-F; and

4. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated:                                  /s/ K B Levine
                                        ----------------------
                                        Kevin Levine
                                        Chief Financial Officer


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

JUN 1 5 2010 

Jim Rexroad 

Avenal Power Center~ LLC 

500 Dallas Street~ Level 31 

Houston~ TX 77002 

Re:	 EPA Comments on the 05/13/2010 Supplemental N02 Air Quality Impact Analysis 

for the Avenal Energy Project 

Dear Mr. Rexroad: 

On May 14~ 2010~ EPA Region 9 received the Supplen1ental N02Air Quality Impact 

Analysis for the Avenal Energy Project dated May 13~ 2010. The analysis addresses the I-hour 

national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for nitrogen dioxide (N02)~ which became 

effective April12~ 2010.75 Fed. Reg. 6474 (February 9~ 2010). The I-hour N02analysis was 

prepared by Sierra Research~ Inc. and submitted on behalf of Avenal Power Center~ LLC. The 

Avenal Energy Project will be a combined-cycle 600-megawatt (MW) power generation facility 

consisting of two GE Energy Frame 7FA natural gas-fired turbine generators~ two heat recovery 

steam generators~ one steam turbine generator (STG)~ and associated equipment. The facility 

will be located on a 148-acre site at the eastern edge ofthe city limits of Avenat Kings County

California~ adjacent to the San Luis Canal. 

EPA Region 9 has reviewed the I-hour N02analysis submitted by Avenal and has 

consulted with staff in the Office of Air Quality Planning and Analysis regarding the submittal. 

We have determined that significant additional infom1ation must be provided by the applicant in 

order for EPA to evaluate whether emissions fron1 the Avenal Energy Project will cause or 

contribute to ambient air pollution in excess ofthe I-hour N02 standard. Emission inventory 

information for the project and other nearby sources needs to be provided. The source emission 

data is a key input for all modeling analyses and one that may require additional consideration 

under the new hourly N02 standard. Key input data used il1 the PVMRM option within 

AERMOD needs to be discussed and justified. In addition~ documentation and justification of 

the appropriateness ofthe meteorological and ambient air quality background data for the I-hour 

N02 analysis needs to be provided. The Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR Part 51 

Appendix W) outlines EPA~s recommendations regarding these issues. It is our understanding 

that EPA will be issLling in the very near future written guidance providing further clarification 

on the applicability of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for hourly N02NAAQS. We plan to 

provide this guidance document to you as soon as we receive it. 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Our detailed comments are provided in the enclosure. We look forward to working with 

you on this matter. Please feel free to contact Carol Bohnenkamp at 

(415) 947-4130, or bohnerlkamp.carol@epa.gov, with any questions regarding this matter. 

Sincerely, 

*Gerardo C. Rios 

Chief, Permits Office 

Enclosure 

cc: Jeffrey R. Holmstead, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 

Gary Rubenstein, Sierra Research
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Vision  Global  Solutions,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Jean-Paul Ouellette,  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2006

                                   /s/ Jean-Paul Ouellette
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 23.1



LOGO

KPMG LLP

205 5th
Avenue SW

Suite 3100

Calgary AB

T2P 4B9

Telephone (403)
691-8000

Fax (403) 691-8008

www.kpmg.ca

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Precision Drilling Corporation

We consent to the use of our reports, each dated March 3, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Precision Drilling
Corporation as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flow for the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016 included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of such reports in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-194966, 333-189046, 333-189045) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statements (No. 333-212736 and 333-202166) on Form-10.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|LOGO                              
|                                  
|Chartered Professional Accountants
|                                  
|March 10, 2017                    
|Calgary, Canada                   



| |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada
provides services to KPMG LLP. |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM ONLINE
GAMING  SYSTEMS,  LTD.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF  MARCH  31,  2000  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                              81,387
<SECURITIES>                                                       662,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    1,137,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 2,045,760
<PP&E>                                                             608,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    (258,560)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   5,680,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,621,200
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                            14,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                             90
<OTHER-SE>                                                       3,932,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     5,680,171
<SALES>                                                          2,023,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 2,023,733
<CGS>                                                              106,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    1,357,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   9,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    550,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                550,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       550,377
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.04


</TABLE>
On motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant filed April 21, 1982,

motion denied September 21,

reconsideration denied November 18, petition for review denied December 20, 1983 (296 Or 236)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOHN PATRICK KENNEDY, *Appellant.*

(CT81-8302; CA A24035)

669 P2d 807

Ronald K. Cox, Assistant Public Defender, Coquille, appeared for motion.

Before Joseph Chief Judge, and Richardson and Gillette, Judges.

GILLETTE, J.

*558GILLETTE, J.

This is one of a series of *“Anders”*
      *1*
      **cases held for this court’s decision in *State v. Horine,*64 Or App 532, 669 P2d 797 (1981). Counsel for the indigent appellant in this criminal case seeks to withdraw as counsel. We deny the motion.

The affidavit accompanying counsel’s motion to withdraw states that defendant represented himself at trial and wished to appeal because he thought the trial judge reached the wrong decision. Counsel further states that he had listened to the audio record and had found only one ruling that had been preserved for appeal. He describes that objection and the testimony surrounding it briefly. Counsel then states that no other errors were preserved and that there are no flagrant errors on the face of the record. He further states that, even if the one preserved ruling were error, it would be harmless, given the remaining evidence. The affidavit then states:

> “That I talked to the defendant and explained the above matters, and he indicated he did not object to the case not proceeding farther as he simply wanted to determine whether he had further legal recourse from the judgment.”

This last paragraph seems to indicate that defendant does not object to the appeal being dismissed, but counsel’s motion is to withdraw, not dismiss the appeal. In addition, the accompanying memorandum from counsel states that the motion to withdraw is submitted in compliance with Anders.

While the matter is not entirely clear, we conclude that counsel is seeking to withdraw, not to dismiss the appeal. The application to withdraw complies with most of the requirements of *Anders*and *State v. Horine, supra.*However, nothing in the record indicates that defendant has been notified by counsel of his right to file a brief *pro se.*Counsel is directed to follow the procedure in that regard outlined in *State v. Horine.*After doing so he may, if it is appropriate, renew his motion to withdraw.

Motion to withdraw as counsel denied.

*Anders v. California,*386 US 738, 87 S Ct 1396, 18 L Ed 2d 493 (1967).
ZUCKERT SCOUTT fr RASENBERGER, L.LE 

888 Seventeenth Street, NV\^ Washington, DC 20006-5309 

Telephone [202] 298-8660 Fax [202] 342-0683 

wwivzsrlawcom 

June 30, 2010 

BY HAND 

Mr. George Wellington 

Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re; Application of Air Japan Co.. Ltd. (Docket OST-200Q-8299/undocketed) 

Dear Mr. Wellington: 

On June 7, 2010, Air Japan Co., Ltd. ("Air Japan") filed an Application in the abovereferenced docket for (1) an amended exemption, to reflect Air Japan's merger with ANA & JP 

Express Co., Ltd., ("ANA & JP Express") (2) a transfer of ANA & JP Express' foreign air carrier 

permit to Air Japan; and (3) an amended statement of authorization. 

After further discussions with Department staff concerning the authority requested. Air 

Japan withdraws its (1) exemption and (2) permit transfer requests as unnecessary given the scope 

of Air Japan's existing authority. Air Japan restates its undocketed application for an amended 

statement of authorization to permit it to wet lease B767-300 freighter aircraft to All Nippon 

Airways Co., Ltd. ("ANA") for ANA's operations between the U.S. and Japan. Air Japan already 

holds an undocketed statement of authorization to wet lease aircraft to ANA for ANA's 

combination operations between the U.S. and Japan. 

A copy of this letter will be filed in the docket. 

Sincen 

Charles J. Simpson, Jr. 

David M. Endersbee 

Counsel for Air Japan Co., Ltd. 

cc: Service list
This is additional information pertaining to Neptune Aviation’s Request for Exemption from 14CFR §21.197(c) 

Certification Procedures for Products, Articles, and Parts, Special Flight Permits with a continuing authorization. 

In addition to citing 14CFR §21.197(c) Certification Procedures for Products, Articles, and Parts, Special flight permits 

with a continuing authorization, Neptune Aviation also requests consideration of 14CFR Subpart K – Fractional 

Ownership Operations under §91.1017 Amending Program Manager’s Management Specifications as precedence for 

permitting a non-air carrier certificate holder to have the continuing authorization, and as a basis for amending 

Neptune’s 14 CFR Part 137 Agricultural Aircraft Operations Specifications, Subpart B—Certification Rules Sec. 137.17 

Amendment of certificate to allow for company issued Special Flight Permits with a continuing authorization. 

Neptune flew a total of 2,224 hours over the 2015 fire season in support of wildfire suppression in Alaska, British 

Columbia, Alberta, and the western United States. Our flight operations fall under operational control of the U.S. Forest 

Service in support of the USFS, BLM, DOIA, State Governments, and other governmental agencies spread throughout a 

very large geographic area. Neptune’s Large Air Tanker (LAT) fleet of 14 aircraft is operated and maintained under a 

military style field deployment model that requires a very high degree of mobility and latitude to operate on very short 

notice. 

Having an exemption allowing the company to issue Special Flight Permits for our LAT fleet will be a valuable means for 

Neptune to safely move an aircraft to one of our two Certificated Repair Stations for critical maintenance that cannot be 

performed in field, especially when it is determined the condition does require a much more capable and safe 

environment for the maintenance. The majority of the times when it is determined the aircraft requires more extensive 

maintenance support occurs after the local FSDO closing time of 16:30 hours and we cannot obtain an SFP until the next 

day. This leaves a national resource unavailable for a much longer period of time than could be the case.

Neptune has the staff, infrastructure, processes, procedures, and experience to properly administer this responsibility 

and believes being granted this exemption is in the best interest of public safety.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,772
<INVENTORY>                                     48,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,767
<PP&E>                                          18,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,434
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,047
<SALES>                                        501,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               501,441
<CGS>                                          447,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,114)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,333)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)
        

</TABLE>