alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Jacob Inbar, President andChief Executive Officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), certifythat:

 

I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.

 

Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, theperiods, presented in the report.

 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

 

(a)               designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which the periodic report is being prepared;

 

(b)              evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)               disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and to the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons fulfilling the equivalent function):

 

(i)                  allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(ii)               anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated:  November 15, 2004              |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ Jacob  Inbar                       |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                           |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT
32.01





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steve Tirado, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented therein.





Date:
      April 24, 2009
            /s/
      Steve Tirado


Steve
      Tirado


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Eunice 
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group Health, Behavior, and Context 
Subcommittee, February 17, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to February 18, 2015, 12:00 
p.m., Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, 
Washington, DC 20015 which was published in the Federal Register on 
January 13, 2015, 80 FR 8, page 1648.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the location to the Embassy 
Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 
20015. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 29, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02090 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) (9/2020) Standard Document(74.14 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) Overview(414.75 KB)

Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) CPPE(25.95 KB)

Grassed Waterway (Ac.) (412) Network Diagram(90.52 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Grassed Waterway

This video explores how Delaware Wildlands in Townsend, DE, is using this practice to reduce erosion and provide wildlife and pollinator habitat on their land.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
# C_2004180EN.01000902.xml

| 13.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3374 — SR TECHNICS / FLS AEROSPACE)

(2004/C 180/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3374. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3374. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsPetition  for Rulemaking Dockets

# Petition for Rulemaking Dockets for 2001

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 7, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Open Petition for Rulemaking Dockets
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 7, 2022
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Heinz-Joachim Neubürger, Chief Financial Officer of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siemens
Aktiengesellschaft. Dated: November 29, 2004 /s/ HEINZ-JOACHIM NEUBÜRGERName: Heinz-Joachim Neubürger
Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1858 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 318
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1858

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2017

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                           February 15, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4514 Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff 
               Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT RYAN SCOTT OSTROM POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4514 Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 318

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1858

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4514 Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, as the ``Staff 
               Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>

                                   AMENDMENT
                                      TO
                           1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN OF
                              GALEY & LORD, INC.

          AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Galey &
Lord, Inc. (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.

          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Galey & Lord, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the "Corporation"), previously adopted the Plan which was approved
by the stockholders of the Corporation;

          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted certain
amendments to the Plan, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the
Corporation;

          WHEREAS, the stockholders of the Corporation approved the amendments
to the Plan set forth hereinbelow at the annual meeting of stockholders of the
Corporation held on February 13, 2001; and

          WHEREAS, all terms and conditions of the Plan, other than as
specifically amended in this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.

          NOW THEREFORE, the Plan has been amended as follows:

          1.  Section 4 of the Plan is amended by deleting the first sentence in
its entirety and inserting the following sentence in its place:

     "The aggregate number of Shares in respect to which Options may be granted
     under the Plan is 1,300,000 Shares, subject to adjustment in accordance
     with Section 11 hereof."

          2.  Section 5 of the Plan is amended by deleting the third sentence in
its entirety and inserting the following sentence in its place:

     "No Optionee who is an executive officer of the Corporation shall, during
     any period of three fiscal years of the Corporation, be granted Options to
     purchase more than an aggregate of 600,000 Shares."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Secretary of the Corporation has executed this
Amendment and certifies that the amendment to the Plan set forth above
accurately reflects the amendment to the Plan adopted by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation.


                              /s/ Leonard F. Ferro
                              ------------------------------
                              Leonard F. Ferro
                              Secretary
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50528

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO SAUCEDO-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CR-33-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfonso Saucedo-Hernandez appeals from his sentence for

illegal reentry into the United States after his deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His motion for a stay of his

appeal pending the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v.

Almendarez-Torres, 113 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. granted,

117 S. Ct. 1333 (1997), is DENIED.

Saucedo-Hernandez argues that because the indictment failed

to allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction, he
No. 97-50528

-2-

could only be sentenced under § 1326(a). However, due to his

prior aggravated felony conviction, Saucedo-Hernandez was

sentenced under § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by this

court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943,

946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2480

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Kenneth M. Williams, * Western District of Missouri.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 4, 2005

Filed: February 9, 2005 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Williams appeals from the final judgment entered by the district court1

upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the record

independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we agree with counsel that

there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, in view of the district court’s imposition
-2-

of the statutory minimum sentence, to which Williams did not object. Accordingly,

we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 

______________________________
KPMG LLPChartered Accountants
    
    Telephone
    
    (403) 691-80002700 205  5th Avenue SW
    
    Telefax
    
    (403) 691-8008Calgary AB  T2P 4B9
    
    Internet
    
    www.kpmg.ca
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
    
    the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F and the incorporation by reference in
the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-159965) and on Form F-10 (File No.
333-156844) our auditors report dated March 10, 2010 on the consolidated balance sheets of
Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust) as at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated
statements of earnings and retained earnings (deficit), comprehensive income (loss) and cash
flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009; and
 
    
    the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of our Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 10, 2010 on the Trusts internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
ACCEPTED

12-15-00102-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

6/3/2015 1:29:51 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/3/2015 1:29:51 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# PWR and BWR Pressure Vessel Fluence Calculation Benchmark Problems and Solutions (NUREG/CR-6115)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6115 (PDF 11.94 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2001**Date Published:** September 2001

**Prepared by:** J.F. Carew, K. Hu, A. Aronson, A. Prince, G. Zamonsky

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

W.R. Jones, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6968

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In order to provide the high confidence required in the determination of pressure vessel embrittlement and the evaluation of the Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) screening criteria, Regulatory Guide 1.190, "Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence," recommends detailed benchmarking of pressure vessel fluence calculations. In response to this recommendation, this report provides the detailed specification and corresponding numerical solutions for a set of PWR and BWR pressure vessel fluence benchmark problems. PWR benchmark problems have been specified for (1) a standard core loading pattern, (2) a low-leakage core loading pattern and (3) a partial length shield assembly core design. Since BWR fuel loading patterns are presently not being designed for vessel fluence reduction, only a single BWR problem is specified. These benchmark problems allow a detailed assessment of the numerical procedures, code implementation, and the various modeling approximations against state-of-the-art solutions for representative operating configurations.

The problems have been solved using the DORT discrete ordinates transport code, the MESH source processing code, and the BUGLE-93 ENDF/B-VI nuclear data. Detailed neutron flux solutions are provided at selected pressure vessel azimuthal, radial, and axial locations. A pin-wise core neutron source is provided which includes the fuel burnup dependence of both the magnitude and energy dependence of the neutron source. Dosimeter responses are calculated for a typical set of LWR fast neutron dosimeter materials. In addition, MCNP Monte Carlo calculations have been performed for the PWR standard core and partial length shield assembly core loadings and the BWR problem. Comparisons of the MCNP and DORT vessel fluence calculations are presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021