alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
        Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
        quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
        information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
        in
        all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
        AltiGen Communications, Inc.
 
 
 Date:
                  August 13, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Gilbert HuName:
              Gilbert
                  HuTitle:
              Chief
                  Executive Officer
# C_2004221EN.01000101.xml

| 3.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 September 2004

(2004/C 221/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2172 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4374 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6791 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1211 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5338 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,06 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5774 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,739 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6592 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4273 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4374 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 946 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,98 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,162 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 840 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7437 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5884 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4918 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8681 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0726 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9495 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2172

JPY

Japanese yen

133,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4374

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6791

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1211

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5338

ISK

Iceland króna

88,06

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5774

CZK

Czech koruna

31,739

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6592

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4273

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4374

ROL

Romanian leu

40 946

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,98

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,162

TRL

Turkish lira

1 840 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7437

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5884

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4918

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8681

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0726

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,33

ZAR

South African rand

7,9495

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004242EN.01000101.xml

| 29.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2004

(2004/C 242/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2335 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,44 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6801 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0558 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,551 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3505 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5762 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,609 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6656 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4278 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3756 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 123 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,96 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,055 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 852 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,719 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5677 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6206 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8424 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0909 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8935 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2335

JPY

Japanese yen

137,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,44

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6801

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0558

CHF

Swiss franc

1,551

ISK

Iceland króna

87,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3505

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5762

CZK

Czech koruna

31,609

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6656

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4278

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3756

ROL

Romanian leu

41 123

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,96

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,055

TRL

Turkish lira

1 852 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,719

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5677

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6206

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8424

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0909

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,69

ZAR

South African rand

7,8935

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2010 |  | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                    
|                        |  | Levy Gerzberg                        
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Bodyguard Records.com, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               138 Fulton Street
                                                              New York, NY 10038
                                                                  (212) 751-2179
February 1, 2001

James T. Patten
P.O. Box 682
Bernardsville, NJ 07924

Re: Amendment to Loan Agreements

Dear Mr. Patten:

         This will serve to confirm our prior conversations and negotiations
concerning the parameters of an amendment to the July 5, 2000, September 29,
2000 and November 6, 2000, loan agreements and the annexed $10,000, $15,000 and
$15,000, respective, 12% promissory notes of even date therewith (collectively
the "Agreements"), executed by Bodyguard Records.com, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and payable to the order of James T. Patten ("JTP").
In this regard, and in consideration of the mutual benefit derived herefrom, the
receipt and adequacy of which is hereby jointly and severally acknowledged and
accepted, we hereby agree as follows:

1. AMENDMENT. The Agreements are hereby amended to extend the Due Date (as that
term is defined in the Agreements) until the sooner of July 31, 2001 or the
closing date of the Company's initial public offering under and pursuant to Form
SB-2 Registration Statement No. 333-40444.

2. CONFIRMATION OF AGREEMENTS. Except as herein modified, the Company and JTP
hereby reconfirm the validity and enforceability of the Agreements.

         If the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement and understanding,
please indicate your acceptance by signing the enclosed copy of this letter
agreement in the space marked "Agreed to and Accepted" and returning the signed
document to the undersigned via facsimile.

Very truly yours

Bodyguard Records.com, Inc.


By: _____________________
      John Rollo, President

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:


 ----------------------
      James T. Patten

JR:nas
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700)

| File       | Title                                           |
|------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Revision 3 | Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines |
| Revision 2 | Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines |

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

#### Related Information

            - Contact us about NUREG-0700

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.13

                            CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE
                                      OF
                          AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES
                                      OF
                     SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                      OF
                       THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

  (Pursuant to Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the state of
Delaware)


          The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation
existing under the General Corporation Law of the state of Delaware,

                             DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

          That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company was filed in the
Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on February 16, 1994,
and a Certificate of Designation was filed in said Office of the Secretary of
State on January 26, 1998, as subsequently corrected, pursuant to which the
Company was authorized to issue up to 550,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock;

          That the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting held on May 6,
1998 duly adopted a resolution authorizing and directing an increase in the
authorized number of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, from 550,000 shares to 590,000 shares, all in accordance with the
provisions of Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. has caused
this Certificate to be signed by Arthur J. Bacci, its President, this 17/th/ day
of August 1999.

                              THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

                              By:  /s/ Arthur J. Bacci
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                       Arthur J. Bacci
                                       President
# C_2004201EN.01001201.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Cagliari by order of that court of 14 May 2004 in the case of Enirisorse SpA and Sotacarbo SpA

(Case C-237/04)

(2004/C 201/22)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Cagliari (Cagliari District Court) of 14 May 2004, received at the Court Registry on 7 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Enirisorse SpA and Sotacarbo SpA on the following questions:

| (a) | Does Article 33 of Law [273/02] implement an incompatible State aid in favour of Sotacarbo SpA., within the meaning of Article 87 of the Treaty and does it do so, moreover, unlawfully in so far as the Commission was not informed of that aid, within the meaning of Article 88(3) EC? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Does Article 33 of Law [273/02] implement an incompatible State aid in favour of Sotacarbo SpA., within the meaning of Article 87 of the Treaty and does it do so, moreover, unlawfully in so far as the Commission was not informed of that aid, within the meaning of Article 88(3) EC?

| (b) | Does Article 33 of Law [273/02] conflict with Articles 43, 44, 48 and 49 et seq. EC, concerning freedom of establishment and the free movement of services? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Does Article 33 of Law [273/02] conflict with Articles 43, 44, 48 and 49 et seq. EC, concerning freedom of establishment and the free movement of services?

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00018-CR

Thomas Issac Seaton

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1402730D)

February 11, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# C_2004190EN.01001502.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 12 May 2004

in Case T-191/01 André Hecq v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Social security - Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Serious illness - Refusal to reimburse certain medical services at 100 %)

(2004/C 190/25)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-191/01 André Hecq, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg), represented by C. Mourato, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall) – application for annulment of two decisions adopted by the office responsible for the settlement of claims on 13 October 2000 and 6 November 2000 respectively, refusing to reimburse at 100 % certain medical services provided for the applicant's wife – the Court of First Instance, composed of J. Azizi, President, and M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 May 2004 the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The decisions adopted by the office responsible for the settlement of claims are annulled in so far as they refuse to reimburse at 100 % certain medical services provided for the applicant's wife; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decisions adopted by the office responsible for the settlement of claims are annulled in so far as they refuse to reimburse at 100 % certain medical services provided for the applicant's wife;

| 2. | The Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317 of 10.11.2001.

1

---
# C_2004239EN.01001002.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/10

---

Removal from the register of Case C-322/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 239/19)

By order of 17 May 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-322/03: Commission of the European Commission v Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 6.9.2003.

1

---
# L_2016264DE.01004401.xml

| 30.9.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 264/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 264/44

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/2446 der Kommission vom 28. Juli 2015 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 952/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates mit Einzelheiten zur Präzisierung von Bestimmungen des Zollkodex der Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 343 vom 29. Dezember 2015
  )

Auf Seite 232, Anhang B-01, Titel III, das „Muster — Einheitspapier (Vordrucksatz aus acht Exemplaren)“ erhält folgende Fassung:

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Image 4

Image 5

Image 6

Image 7

Image 8

Image 9

Image 10

Image 11

Image 12

Image 13

Image 14

Image 15

Auf Seite 247, Anhang B-01, Titel IV, das „Muster — Einheitspapier — Ergänzungsvordruck (Vordrucksatz aus acht Exemplaren)“ erhält folgende Fassung:

Image 16

Image 17

Image 18

Image 19

Image 20

Image 21

Image 22

Image 23

Image 24

Image 25

Image 26

Image 27

Image 28

Image 29

Image 30

Image 31

---
#### Flambeau Paper Company, Appellant, vs. City of Park Falls, Respondent.

*June 1*

June *20, 1932.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Bundy, Beach & Holland*of Eau Claire, attorneys, and *Miller, Mack & Fairchild*of Milwaukee of counsel, and for the respondent on that of *C. E. Lovett*of Park Falls.

Fowler,' J.

The action was brought to recover the amount of the tax on the property involved in the *certiorari*case of *State ex rel. Flambeau Paper Co. v. Windus,*city clerk of Park Falls *(ante,*p. 583, 243 N. W. 216), in excess of the amount as it would be if computed on an assessment based upon the highest valuation of the property fixed by plaintiff’s witnesses before the board of review. The assessment having been upheld in the *certiorari*case, opinion in which is filed herewith, the judgment of dismissal must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Main Site

### Filter by Document Type

 All 

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 2154 V

UNPUBLISHED

JEREMY HARMON , on behalf of her

minor child, B.H.

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 1 8 , 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order
concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On November 10 , 2021

, Jeremy Harmon filed a petition for compensation on behalf of his minor child , B.H., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d that B.H. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on November 1, 2018

. ECF

N o. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n July 15, 2022

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Offic e.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6812

JERRY PRINCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN JABE, Warden; RONALD ANGELONE, Director;

SERGEANT MAYES; G. TURNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-424-3)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 21, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Prince, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties agreed to proceed before a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the

record and the magistrate judge's order and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate

judge. Prince v. Jabe, No. CA-95-424-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (B Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        Basic References
        Glossary
        Newsletters and Other NRC Information
        Standard Review Plans and Review Standards
        The Student Corner
        Brochures and Fact Sheets
        Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Fire of 1975 and the History of NRC Fire Regulations (NUREG/BR-0361 and DVD)
         Business Opportunities with NRC (See 
        Contracting Opportunities
        )

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, August 26, 2020