alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016288EN.01005801.xml

| 22.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1368/2014 of 17 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1372/2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 366 of 20 December 2014
  )

On page 15, Article 1:

for:

‘Article 1

(1)   Annex 1 is amended as follows:

| (a) | The section “DENMARK-ITALY” is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

The section “DENMARK-ITALY” is deleted;

(2)   In the section “FRANCE-LUXEMBOURG”, point (b) is replaced by the following:

| “(b) | The Exchange of Letters of 17 July and 20 September 1995 concerning the terms for settling reciprocal claims under Articles 93, 95 and 96 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 and the Exchange of Letters dated 10 July and 30 August 2013”.’, |
| --- | --- |

“(b)

The Exchange of Letters of 17 July and 20 September 1995 concerning the terms for settling reciprocal claims under Articles 93, 95 and 96 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 and the Exchange of Letters dated 10 July and 30 August 2013”.’,

read:

‘Article 1

Annex 1 to Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 is amended as follows:

| (a) | the section “DENMARK-ITALY” is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the section “DENMARK-ITALY” is deleted;

| (b) | in the section “FRANCE-LUXEMBOURG”, point (b) is replaced by the following:






  “(b) | The Exchange of Letters of 17 July and 20 September 1995 concerning the terms for settling reciprocal claims under Articles 93, 95 and 96 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 and the Exchange of Letters dated 10 July and 30 August 2013”.’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

in the section “FRANCE-LUXEMBOURG”, point (b) is replaced by the following:

“(b)

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-19-00737-CR, 04-19-738-CR

Aidan VITELA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 5942 & 6023

Honorable Kirsten B. Cohoon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 29, 2021.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### Acres, Appellant, vs. Fromm and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Bogue, Sanderson & Kammhols*of Portage.

For the respondents : *Sanborn, Blake & Aberg, Ernest H. Pett,*and *Edwin Conmd,*all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on March 7, 1939.
# L_2015193DE.01016602.xml

| 21.7.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 193/166 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 193/166

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/234 der Kommission vom 13. Februar 2015 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2454/93 hinsichtlich der vorübergehenden Verwendung von Beförderungsmitteln, die dazu bestimmt sind, von einer natürlichen Person mit Wohnsitz im Zollgebiet der Union genutzt zu werden

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 39 vom 14. Februar 2015
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 39 vom 14. Februar 2015

Auf Seite 13, Artikel 1 zur Änderung des Artikels 561 Absatz 2 Unterabsatz 2 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2454/93:

anstatt:

„Die private Nutzung des Fahrzeugs ist gestattet für Fahrten zwischen Arbeitsplatz und Wohnort des Beschäftigten oder für die Ausführung einer im Arbeitsvertrag der betreffenden Person vorgesehenen Aufgabe.“

muss es heißen:

„Die private Nutzung des Beförderungsmittels ist gestattet für Fahrten zwischen Arbeitsplatz und Wohnort des Beschäftigten oder für die Ausführung einer im Arbeitsvertrag der betreffenden Person vorgesehenen beruflichen Aufgabe.“

---
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                               Cumulative
                                       Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended        March 31,1995
                                            March 31,                      March 31,            (Inception)To
                                        1997           1998            1997           1998      March 31, 1998
<S>
Computation of Loss Per Share       <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss                            $    (  764)   $   ( 1,173)    $   ( 2,782)   $   ( 3,282)   $   ( 11,790)
Preferred Stock Dividends                (   67)       (    86)        (   138)       (   245)       (    433)
Net Loss with Preferred Stock
  Dividends                         $    (  831)   $   ( 1,259)    $   ( 2,920)   $   ( 3,527)   $   ( 12,223)
 
Loss Per Share                      $     (0.08)   $     (0.07)    $     (0.27)   $     (0.21)   $      (1.02)
              
Weighted Average Common 
  Shares Outstanding                 10,866,785     17,365,101      10,989,494     16,765,123      12,026,348

</TABLE>
012851/000097 131 - 1760279v1 NO. 03-15-00382-CV



### ______________________ ________________________ IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS



### ______________________ ________________________ STEVEN B. ARMBRUSTER Appellant
V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee



### ______________________ ________________________ Appeal from the 277 th District Court Williamson County, Texas



### ______________________ ________________________
APPELLEES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEES' BRIEF



### ______________________ ________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: Appellees Deutsche Bank Nation al Trust Company as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2 and Juanita Strickland move this Cour t to grant an extension of time of four weeks, ACCEPTED 03-15-00382-CV 7064224 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/23/2015 3:44:20 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 012851/000097 131 - 1760279v1 

### to and including November 19, 2015, to file thei r brief. In support thereof, Appellees respectf ully show as follows:
1. Appellant filed his brief on September 22, 2015. Therefore, Appellees’ brief is currentl y due October 22, 2015.
2. Counsel for Appellees is pref erentially set for trial on October 5, 2015 in the 172 nd 

### Judicial District Court of Jefferson County, Texas. That case is exp ected to last more than one week. Counsel is preparing for that trial.
3. This is Appellees’ first request fo r an extension of time to file their brief.
4. Counsel for Appellant is un opposed to this request. PRAYER Wherefore, Appellees ask the Court to grant an extension of time, to and including, November 19, 2015.3 012851/000097 131 - 1760279v1 

### Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Peter C. Smart Peter C. Smart State Bar No. 00784989 Crain, Caton & James, P.C. 1401 McKinney St., Suite 1700 Houston, Texas 77010 (713) 658-2323 (Telephone) (713) 658-1921 (Facsimile) psmart@craincaton.com ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Certificate of Conference
I certify that my office conferred with Appellant and Appellant is unopposed to the request made herein.
/s/ Peter C. Smart Peter C. Smart

Certificate of Service I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on the following counsel of record through the electronic filing syst em and via regular mail this September 23, 2015:
David Rogers Law Offices of David Rogers 1201 Spyglass, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746

/s/ Peter C. Smart Peter C. Smart
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Wyllie , Chief Financial Officer of Balaton Power
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        | /s/ Robert Wyllie      
| | Name:  | Robert Wyllie          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | July 16, 2007          

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1333
ROBERT S. FASTOV, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PALISADES SWIMMING POOL ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; JEFFREY BRYAN; LINTON HENGERER; HEIDI BUMPERS; NANCY BARRY; LOIS BURLEIGH; MARLEIGH DOVER; JOYCE CHUNG; CHRISTINE HENCK; JAN NEUDORFER; JOHN WINTROL; JOHN DOES 1-25; JANE DOES 1-25, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:05-cv-01760-AW) Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 9, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert S. Fastov, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Paul Rothman, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert S. Fastov appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and request for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We deny as moot Fastov’s motion to expedite. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fastov v. Palisades Swimming Pool Assoc., Inc. , No. 8:05-cv-01760-AW (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Small-Scale Experiments: Effects of Chemical Reactions on Debris-Bed Head Loss — A Subtask of GSI-191(NUREG/CR-6868,LA-UR-03-6415)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6868 (PDF - 5.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2003**Date Published:**March 2005

**Prepared by:** R.C. Johns, B.C. Letellier (Principal Investigator) Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 

K.J. Howe, A.K. Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico (Subcontractor) Albuquerque, NM 87110

T.Y. Chang, NRC Project Manager 

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6041

Availability Notice

Small-scale head-loss flow tests and quiescent-immersion corrosion tests were performed to determine whether post-loss-of-coolant-accident debris generation and sump-screen head loss in a pressurized-water-reactor containment system can be affected by chemical interactions between the emergency-core-cooling-system water, which contains boric acid and sodium hydroxide at elevated temperatures, and (1) exposed metal surfaces, (2) inorganic zinc-based paint chips, and (3) fiberglass insulation debris. The principal findings of this study are that: (1) temperature-dependent corrosion of zinc metal can occur at typical temperatures and pH; (2) precipitation of dissolved iron, aluminum, and zinc in excess of their low solubility limits produces transportable gelatinous material that can cause additional pressure drops across a fibrous debris bed; (3) dissolved zinc can be leached from zinc-based coatings debris; and (4) silica can be leached from typical fiberglass insulation debris and may be an important constituent of the chemical system. However, the implied progression from metal corrosion to the ultimate precipitation of a flocculent material was not demonstrated conclusively. One alternative corrosion product observed in the zinc immersion tests was a crystalline surface growth, suggesting redeposition of zinc compounds initiated in a saturated solution. Electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectrometry, and x-ray diffraction methods were employed to determine the composition of the surface corrosion product.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 13896 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:13

- cr - 00290

- PGB

- KRS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus KEVIN REYNOLDS, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( April 18, 2016 ) Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-13896 Date Filed: 04/18/2016 Page: 1 of 22 Aaron S. Bag hdadi, appointed counsel for Kevin Reynolds, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , an d Reynolds’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 14-13896 Date Filed: 04/18/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                     |     |                                                                                       
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 20, 2007 | By: | /s/ Richard Dunning                                                                   
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief financial Officer
Online Gaming Systems, Ltd.
Argued and submitted November 30, 1992,

affirmed July 14, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, *Appellant.*

(DA 424848-9008; CA A72374)

856 P2d 332

Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

„ Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

*595Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson,* Judges.

De MUNIZ, J.

*

 Leeson, J., *vice*Buttler, J., retired.

*596De MUNIZ, J.

Defendant appeals the sentence he received after his probation was revoked and terminated. He makes two assignments of error. We affirm.

On August 4,1990, defendant committed theft in the second degree and pled guilty to that charge on December 12, 1990. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for two years. As a condition of probation, defendant was ordered to serve 40 days in jail. On October 16, 1991, the court found defendant had violated his probation; it revoked and terminated his probation and sentenced him to six months in jail. The sentence was to be served concurrently with a previously imposed Clackamas County sentence.

Defendant argues that the court erred in revoking his probation and imposing the six-month jail term. He contends that, because he was convicted of a misdemeanor, the court could not impose the 40-day jail term as a condition of probation. *See State v. Wold,*105 Or App 158, 803 P2d 782 (1991).

Defendant could have, but did not, appeal from the order placing him on probation.1 The statutory period to challenge the conditions of probation contained in that order expired before defendant’s probation was revoked. He cannot attack the validity of those conditions in this appeal. *See State v. Hovator,*37 Or App 557, 561, 588 P2d 56 (1978).

In his second assignment of error, defendant argues that the court erred in ordering the six-month jail term to run concurrently with a Clackamas County judgment. We have previously held that the Clackamas County judgment improperly imposed a jail term and remanded that case for resentencing. *State v. Beavers,*115 Or App 752, 838 P2d 644 (1992). Defendant now contends that the “sentence in this *597case cannot be served concurrent with an illegal sentence in Clackamas County.” However, he cites no authority for that proposition, and we reject his argument that our remand for resentencing in the Clackamas County case somehow renders illegal the sentence imposed in this case.

Affirmed.

1

 ORS 138.053(1) provides, in part:

> “This section establishes the judgments and orders that are subject to the appeal provisions and to the limitations on review under ORS 138.040 and ORS 138.050. Ajudgment or order of a court, if the order is imposed after judgment, is subject to ORS 138.040 and 138.050 if this disposition includes any of the following:

> <<* * * * *

> “(c) Places a defendant on probation.”
# C_2004228EN.01000202.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-381/01: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 77/388/EEC - VAT - Article 11(A)(1)(a) - Taxable amount - Subsidy directly linked to the price - Regulation (EC) No 603/95 - Aid granted in the dried fodder sector)

(2004/C 228/04)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-381/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Traversa) v Italian Republic (Agent: I. Braguglia, assisted by G. de Bellis) supported by Republic of Finland (Agent: T. Pynnä) and by Kingdom of Sweden (Agent: A. Kruse) — application for a declaration that, by failing to levy value added tax on aid paid under Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 of 21 February 1995 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (OJ 1995 L 63, p. 1), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 348 of 8.12.2001.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests

# Recent FOIA Requests for 2017

The following pages present chronological listings of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Requests submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during each month of the current fiscal year. These listings include the subject and reference number of each request. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 15, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 15, 2022