alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



James Charuk, as Chief Executive Officer of SMI Products, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
that

     (1) the Company's Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
applicable; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: April 11, 2003                       /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                            __________________________
                                            James Charuk
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            SMI Products, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JENNIFER CABALLERO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

SANJIV VIG,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00033-CV

Appeal from the

388th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DCM6244)

O R D E R

On July 3, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ joint request to mediate this appeal. The 

order included a requirement that the parties file a motion to reestablish the appellate timetable in 

the event mediation was unsuccessful. Neither party filed a motion, but Appellant filed a letter 

advising the Court that mediation was unsuccessful. We have construed the letter as a motion to 

reestablish the appellate timetable. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due 30 days 

from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9

th day of October, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
# Brush Management (Ac.) (314) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Brush Management (Ac.) (314) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard and supporting documents for Brush Management (Ac.) (314).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Brush Management (Ac.) (314) (3/17) Standard Document(66.2 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Brush Management (Ac.) (314) CPPE(25.9 KB)

Brush Management (Ac.) (314) Network Diagram(78.82 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Brush Management

This video explores how Dan Doornbos in Alder, MT, is using this practice to improve his rangeland, increasing his forage and improving wildlife habitat.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
#### Heldeman, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Power & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Louis J. Fellens*of Fond du Lac and *Jefferson Burrus*of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the respondent: *Schubring, Ryan, Petersen & Suther.land*of Madison, attorneys, and *T. L. Doyle*of Fond du Lac of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated January 30, 1998, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Alrenco, Inc. and Subsidiaries, after restatement for
the 1998 pooling of interests with RTO, Inc., included in the Quarterly Report
of Alrenco, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of Alrenco, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08915, effective July 26,
1996).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
--------------------------
    Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas Texas
May 12, 1998
EXHIBIT 10.7

                                   eDiets.com
                   Arrangement Letter with Mallory Factor Inc.

Duties:              Work with eDiets management to strategize and coordinate
                     all public, media and investor relations efforts. Oversee
                     the expenditure and implementation of such programs,
                     including the hiring of firms and individuals to carry them
                     out.

Budget:              Authorized to spend with prior management approval up to
                     $25,000 a month in fees plus expenses billed by firms and
                     individuals carrying out these programs.

                     Any fee-based work by Mallory Factor and/or Mallory Factor
                     Inc. must be pre-approved by eDiets.

                     eDiets will pay all reasonable expenses in carrying out the
                     duties above.

Compensation:        Term:                     12 months

                     Equity Grant:             400,000 warrants at $0.75

                     Warrant Vesting:          Immediate

                     Warrant Expiration:       3 years from date of grant

Bonus Compensation:  A $50,000 cash bonus shall be considered by the Board at
                     the end of 12-month period and will be rewarded for
                     significant progress in accomplishing our goal of a Nasdaq
                     listing.

If these terms are acceptable, please sign.

eDiets.com

By: /s/
    ----------------------------------------
     David R. Humble

Date: /s/
      --------------------------------------

ACCEPTED:

MALLORY FACTOR INC.

By: /s/
    ----------------------------------------
      Mallory Factor
Date:  January 8, 2001
       January 29, 2001
No. 84-6536.

#### White *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Griffith*v. *Kentucky, ante,*p. 314.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                            /s/ J. Ardie Dillen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  J. Ardie Dillen
                                            Title: Chairman, President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

June 23, 2021

Order 

Clerk

June 23, 2021

162932(87)

BRIAN WEBB,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., doing business as 

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 162932

v COA: 351048

Wayne CC: 18-012887-NF

PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and MICHIGAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

PLACEMENT FACILITY, also known as 

MICHIGAN ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNNAMED SERVICING INSURER,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before June 28, 2021.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants [NUREG-75/014 (WASH-1400)]

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 21, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Final Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (COLs) for William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-2111)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)License Verification System (LVS)

# Conceptual Overview of the License Verification Process

The License Verification System (LVS) will use a process based on the following steps, as illustrated by the conceptual diagram below:
        - An authorized customer requests X curies of Cobalt-60 (Co-60) from an authorized supplier and provides a copy of its license, as required by Title 10, Section 30.41, of the  Code of Federal Regulations  ( 10 CFR 30.41 ), "Transfer of Byproduct Material," or the  Agreement State  equivalent;
        - The authorized supplier submits specific information gathered from the customer's license to LVS in order to verify the official copy of the customer's license.
        - LVS queries the  Web-Based Licensing (WBL) System  to obtain the requested license image.
        - WBL displays the license image where the supplier can determine the possession limit for the requested material.
        - LVS queries the  National Source Tracking System (NSTS)  with the possession limit for Category 1 and Category 2 authorized materials.
        - If the customer is above their possession limit in NSTS, LVS will display a message for the supplier to contact the regulator.
        - If no issues exist, LVS displays the official license image and the authorized supplier notes the license verification is complete in LVS.
        - The material is then, transfered to the customer.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Conceptual Overview of the License Verification Process
          - Manual License Verification Procedure
          - Help Desk Support

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
# C_2004228EN.01002501.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Retten i Hørsholm (Denmark) by order of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Anklagemyndigheden against Steffen Ryborg

(Case C-279/04)

(2004/C 228/50)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by the Retten i Hørsholm (Denmark), by order of 4 June 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 28 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Anklagemyndigheden against Steffen Ryborg.

The Retten i Hørsholm asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following questions:

| 1.a. | Are Article 39 EC, Article 49 EC and Article 10 EC to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from requiring registration of a motor vehicle when the vehicle belongs to an employer established in a neighbouring Member State and is used by an employee who is resident in the first-mentioned Member State for work purposes and during his free time in both Member States? |
| --- | --- |

1.a.

Are Article 39 EC, Article 49 EC and Article 10 EC to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from requiring registration of a motor vehicle when the vehicle belongs to an employer established in a neighbouring Member State and is used by an employee who is resident in the first-mentioned Member State for work purposes and during his free time in both Member States?

| 1.b | If in the assessment for question 1.a weight is to be accorded to whether any private use of the vehicle is ancillary to business use, which criteria should be used by the national court in determining whether the non-business use of the vehicle is ancillary to the business use, when it can be assumed that the vehicle is used for business purposes, see Case C-127/86 Yves Ledoux [1988] ECR 3741, paragraph 18? |
| --- | --- |

1.b

If in the assessment for question 1.a weight is to be accorded to whether any private use of the vehicle is ancillary to business use, which criteria should be used by the national court in determining whether the non-business use of the vehicle is ancillary to the business use, when it can be assumed that the vehicle is used for business purposes, see Case C-127/86 Yves Ledoux [1988] ECR 3741, paragraph 18?

---
# C_2004118EN.01005301.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/53

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-409/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 118/116)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 27 April 2004, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-409/03, Manuel Simões dos Santos v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004.

1

---
No. 90-5536.

#### Amsden *v.*Moran et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Guidance for Assessing Exemption Requests from the Nuclear Power Plant Licensed Operator Staffing Requirements Specified in 10 CFR 50.54(m) (NUREG-1791)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document 
        - NUREG-1791 (PDF - 207.60 KB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2005**Date Published:**July 2005

**Prepared by:** J. Persensky, A. Szabo/U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission C. Plott, T. Engh/Micro Analysis and Design V. Barnes/Performance, Safety, and Health Associates

A. Szabo, NRC Project Manager J. Persensky, Senior Technical Advisor

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6630

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Regulations set forth by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) prescribe the qualifications and staffing levels for licensed operating personnel for nuclear power plants. The introduction of advanced reactor designs and increased use of advanced automation technologies in existing nuclear power plants will likely change the roles, responsibilities, composition, and size of the crews required to control plant operations. Current regulations regarding control room staffing, which are based upon the concept of operation for existing light-water reactors, may no longer apply. Therefore, applicants for an operating license for an advanced reactor, and current licensees who have implemented significant changes to existing control rooms, may submit applications for exemptions from current staffing regulations. The NRC staff is responsible for reviewing the exemption requests and must determine whether the staffing proposals provide adequate assurance that public health and safety will be maintained at a level that is comparable to that afforded by compliance with the current regulations.

This guidance provides a process for systematically reviewing and assessing these submittals. It details the information, data, and review criteria necessary to review the exemption request. The information and data from an exemption request could include (1) the description of the request, the concept of operations, and operational conditions considered, (2) supporting analyses and documentation from operating experience, functional requirements analysis and function allocation, task analysis, job definition, and staffing plan, and (3) data and analysis from validation exercises performed to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of the proposed staffing plan.

The information collections contained in this guidance are covered by the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0011.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2004136EN.01000101.xml

| 14.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 May 2004

(2004/C 136/01)

1 euro ==

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1823 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6703 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1415 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5383 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,163 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9462 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5862 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,899 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6539 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4251 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,769 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 392 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,335 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 828 864 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7255 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6447 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2218 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9731 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0408 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,2363 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1823

JPY

Japanese yen

135,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6703

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1415

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5383

ISK

Iceland króna

87,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,163

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9462

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5862

CZK

Czech koruna

31,899

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6539

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4251

PLN

Polish zloty

4,769

ROL

Romanian leu

40 392

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,335

TRL

Turkish lira

1 828 864

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7255

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6447

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2218

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9731

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0408

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,68

ZAR

South African rand

8,2363

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>



<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                          8,231,711
<SECURITIES>                                   22,515,959
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,104,438 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (175,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    31,525,162 <F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,269,052
<PP&E>                                             63,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (16,065)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 97,518,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,524,026
<BONDS>                                        63,728,514 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           43,911
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,222,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   97,518,977
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,666,420
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,554,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,248,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (136,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       52,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (83,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 1,242,003
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,158,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .31


<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES MATURED POLICIES RECEIVABLE AND LOANS RECEIVABLE.
<F2> INCLUDES PURCHASED LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES.
<F3> REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1



                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements  on Form S-3  related to the Shelf  Registration  dated May 26,  2000
(File No. 333-37922) of Colonial Realty Limited  Partnership of our report dated
January 18, 2002,  except for Note 16, as to which the date is February 25, 2002
relating to financial  statements and financial statement schedules which appear
in this Form 10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama

March 28, 2002