alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Speight *v.*William Wooten.

Under the act of 1822 ( *Rev. c.*1131) for the relief of insolvent debtors, the sickness of the surety is no excuse for the default of the principal.

The plaintiff had recovered a judgment in the Comity Court of Wayne, against one *Slancil,*upon which a ca. *sa.*issued. The defendant, under the act of 1822 *(Rev. £.*1131,) became the surety of *Standi*for his appearance at’the County Court, for the purpose of taking the insolvent debtor’s oath. *Standi*made default, and a judgment was rendered on the bond against him and the defendant, for the amount of the debt. Afterwards the defendant sued out writs of *supersedeas*and *certiorari,*and stated in his affidavit to procure them, that after the execution of the bond, and before the return day of the *ca. sa.*he, the defendant, was taken dangerously sick, and for that reason was unable to attend at the court and surrender *Standi.*At the return of the *certiorari,*before his Honor Judge Martin, on the last circuit, the writ was dismissed on the motion of the plaintiff, and judgment being rendered upon the bond given by the defendant under the act of 1810, upon suing out the writ, he appealed.

*328A summary judgment is properly rendered upon a bond given under the act of 1810, *{Rev c.*> *93, ■*upon suing out a *cer-tiorari.*

*Henry*and *Badger,*for the defendant*

*¿dordecai,*for the plaintiff.

Ruffin, Judge.

The counsel for the defendants pro-» perly yield, that the judgment of the County Court was right, and that the sickness of the surety was no sufficient ground for relief against that judgment. He hound himself for the appearance of the principal debtor. It is indeed his privilege to compel that appearance, if not voluntarily made. But that is between him and his principal ; and if he cannot, either by reason of his own illness, or the absconding or other fraud of the principal, the surety must submit to pay the debt.

It is however objected, that there was error in the Superior Court in giving a summary judgment on the bond given for the *certiorari.*The act of 1810 (lieu. c. 793) is not entirely perspicuous on this point; but the nature of the subject, as well as the words used, strongly incline us to the opinion, that the bond is not only to be taken, but proceeded on *li*in the same manner, and under the same regulations,” as those given upon appeals. The *certiorari*is of the nature, and in the place of the appeal; the bond is to be transmitted with the record : and a new judgment against the principal is in each case pro.-, nounced in the Superior Court. Why send the bond to the Superior Court, if it is not to be acted on there ? Why put the parties to a new suit, when the plaintiff’s demand has been finally and judicially ascertained, and the surety cannot discharge himself but by paying the debt ? This view is confirmed by the general practice under the act for twenty *years;*during which period, with few exceptions, all the judges have given judgments-on motion.

Per Curiam.t-Judgmewt aeeirmeb.
STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI0:-.1 

ANGUS S. KING, JR. JJC1&1l~ MARTHA KIRKPATRICK 

AUGUSTA 

GOVERNOR 

October 13, 1999 

Ms. Susan Studlien, Deputy Director 

Office of Ecosystem Protection 

U.S. EPA Region I 

JFK Federal Building 

Boston, Ma. 02203-2211 

Dear ~uu~u. 

~~~ 

COMMISSIONER 

OCT 1 s 1999 

A\R QUAUI'f P\Jl.NNING UN\T 

Enclosed please find for your approval for inclusion into Maine's State Implementation 

Plan, amendments to the Chapter 111, Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control 

regulation. A public hearing was held on August 26, 1998 in accordance with federal 

and state administrative requirements. Public notice of the hearing was published in the 

Kennebec Journal on July 23, 1998 and in newspapers statewide on August 5, 1998. 

Substantial changes were made twice which required two 30-day comment periods. 

Public notice of the comment periods was published in newspapers statewide on 

December 30, 1999 and March 31, 1999. On August 19, 1999 the Board of 

Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 111 as revised. The Department is 

confident that the enclosed submission will satisfy all EPA requirements. 

The following administrative materials are enclosed: 

1. Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public 

hearing, dated June 25, 1998; 

2. Copy of the public notice that appeared m the Kennebec Journal on 

July 23, 1998; 

3. S4ffilllary Of comments and the Department's response; 

4. Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of 

the rule, dated August 4, 1999; 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 

AUGUSTA. MAINE 04333·0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 31~ CA:-ICO ROAD 1Z35 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK 

(207) 287·7688 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 041l'3 PRESQUE ISLE, MAI:"E 04769-2094 

RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 9-+1·4570 FAX: (2~'~7) 941-4584 (207) 822·6300 FAX: (207) ~22-h303 (207) 704-0477 FAX: (2l"'7) 764·1507 
5. Chapter 111, Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control as adopted by the Board 

of Environmental Protection on August 19, 1999 and accepted by the Secretary of 

State with an effective date of September 29, 1999; 

6. The MAPA I form which provides certification by the Commissioner that the 

hearing was held August 26, 1998 and the Board of Environmental Protection 

lawfully adopted this rule on August 19, 1999 and certification that the Attorney 

General approved the rule as to form and legality; and 

7. The August 26, 1998 public hearing transcript. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Wheeler at (207) 287-2437. 

Sincerely, 

c~~ Bureau Director 

Department of Environmental Protection 

Enclosures (7) 

cc: Anne Arnold 

Carolyn Wheeler w/o encl. 

SIP file 

,•
# Executive Order 13985

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About NRCS 
-  Priorities 
-  Equity 
-  Executive Order 13985 

Executive Order 13985, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government”, directs federal agencies to examine the services it provides and develop a plan for addressing barriers.

## What is Executive Order 13985?

Executive Order 13985, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government”, directs federal agencies to examine the services it provides and develop a plan for addressing:

(i) any barriers to full and equal participation in programs identified pursuant to section 5(a) of this order; and

(ii) any barriers to full and equal participation in agency procurement and contracting opportunities identified pursuant to section 5(b) of this order.

For purposes of the order:

(a) The term "equity" means the consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality.

(b) The term "underserved communities" refers to populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, that have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life, as exemplified by the list in the preceding definition of "equity."

Read Executive Order 13985
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **Name**                       | ** ** | **State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                     | ** ** | ** **                                       | ** ** |
| Vita Cube  Systems, Inc.  |       | Colorado                                         |       |
| XELR8, Inc.               |       | Colorado                                         |       |
| XELR8 International, Inc. |       | Colorado                                         |       |
| XELR8 Canada, Corp             |       | Nova Scotia, Canada                              |       |

 

----
# L_2015156DE.01002601.xml

| 20.6.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 156/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 156/26

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses (GASP) 2015/818 des Rates vom 26. Mai 2015 zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2011/137/GASP über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Lage in Libyen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 129 vom 27. Mai 2015
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 129 vom 27. Mai 2015

Seite 16, Artikel 1 Nummer 2, neuer Artikel 6 Absatz 2 Buchstabe d:

anstatt:

| „d) | die während des ehemaligen Regimes von Muammar AL-GADDAFI in Libyen veruntreute staatliche Gelder Libyens halten oder kontrollieren, die dazu verwendet werden könnten, ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

die während des ehemaligen Regimes von Muammar AL-GADDAFI in Libyen veruntreute staatliche Gelder Libyens halten oder kontrollieren, die dazu verwendet werden könnten, ...“

muss es heißen:

| „d) | die staatliche Gelder Libyens, die während des ehemaligen Regimes von Muammar AL-GADDAFI in Libyen veruntreut wurden, besitzen oder kontrollieren, die dazu verwendet werden könnten, ...“. |
| --- | --- |

„d)

die staatliche Gelder Libyens, die während des ehemaligen Regimes von Muammar AL-GADDAFI in Libyen veruntreut wurden, besitzen oder kontrollieren, die dazu verwendet werden könnten, ...“.

---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3045510-NOV-201009:12 AM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

p0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147314(55)

COUNTY OF LENAWEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147314

COA: 311255

Lenawee CC: 05-001960-CC

DAVID WAGLEY, BARBARA

WAGLEY, BANK OF LENAWEE,

and PAVILLION MORTGAGE,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

25, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the
Company) dated March 15, 2004 containing the
financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Dennis J. Pauls, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                        
|  
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | -s- Dennis J. Pauls    
| |                        
| | Dennis J. Pauls        
| | Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
# South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000' www.aqmd.gov

May 9, 2012 James N. Goldstene Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 1001 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Goldstene: Submittal of2012 Lead State Implementation Plan
- Los Angeles County At its May 4, 2012 meeting, the South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Governing Board adoptedthe 2012 Lead State Implementation Plan for Los Angeles County (2012 Lead SIP). With the SCAQMD Governing Board!s approval, I am forwarding the 2012 Lead SIP and all the accompanying documents to your office for CARB!s review and approval, and subsequent submissionto the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The 2012 Lead SIP, as approved, is submitted as a single integrated planfor lead attainment. In orderto expedite your review and approval process, I am submitting the following documents that were approved at ourMay4,2012 Hearing, electronically:
• Approved Board Letterregarding the adoption ofthe 2012 Lead SIP and certification ofthe previously approved October 2010 Final EA as the CEQA document for the 2012 Lead SIP pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15153 (AttachmentA) • Governing Board Adoption Resolution No. 12-11 certifying the previously prepared (October 2010) Final Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule 1420.1
­ Emissions Standard for Lead From Large Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Facilities, as the CEQA document for the 2012 Lead State Implementation Planfor Los Angeles County (2012 Lead SIP for LA County), and adoptingthe 2012 Lead SIP for LA County (AttachmentB) • ProofofPublication for Notice ofPublic Hearing (Attachment C) • Final 2012 Lead State Implementation Plan for Los Angeles County including the following appendices: • Appendix I Lead Air Quality in Los Angeles County • Appendix II Rules**-~-- ~--------** **-~ -----~---** **~** .. ........ ....- ............... .............. .......... ..........----.... --_..........._. --­James N. Goldstene -2- May 9, 2012

• Appendix 

### III
- Modeling and Attainment Demonstration • Appendix IV Socioeconomic Report for Rule 1420.1 • Appendix V Response to Comments Please feel free to contact me at (909) 396-3186 ifyou or your staffhave anyquestions regarding this submittal. Sincerely,



# ..**~;/** Elaine Chang, DrPH Deputy Executive Officer Attachments
cc: Barry Wallerstein, SCAQMD Philip Fine, SCAQMD Laki Tisopulos, SCAQMD U.S. EPA (w/o Attachments)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Craig T. Davenport, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ CRAIG T. DAVENPORT                               
| |                                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
    Board

Date: June 28, 2004

1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICER


OF AML
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC § 1350





Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned officer of AML Communications,
Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





(a)
            The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 of
      the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(b)
            Information
      contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





Dated:
February 13, 2009





/s/ Jacob
Inbar


By: Jacob
Inbar,


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
# L_2022002EN.01000801.xml

| 6.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 2/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 2/8

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of 10 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 12 of 17 January 2015
  )

On page 274, in Section C (Reserve risk method 1), paragraph 2, point (e)(ii), of Annex XVII:

for:

‘the variance of the amount referred to paragraph 1(a) in a particular segment and financial year is quadratic in the provision for claims outstanding in a particular segment and financial year;’

read:

‘the variance of the amount referred to in paragraph 1(a) in a particular segment and financial year is quadratic in the best estimate of the provision for claims outstanding in a particular segment and financial year;’.

---
No. 91-686.

#### Georgia *v.*Ashley.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA

September 18, 2020

SEAN PATRICK EMKE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3943

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion for rehearing is denied. On the court's own motion, the prior 

opinion dated July 17, 2020, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its 

place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A

TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SEAN PATRICK EMKE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3943

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 18, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law 

Firm, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sean Patrick Emke appeals the imposition of a prison sentence of 636.45 

months. While serving probation on a prior case of possession of child pornography,1

he was arrested and charged with forty new counts of possession of child pornography. 

He entered an open plea of no contest on these new counts and admitted to violating 

1

In lower court case number 2010-CF-001445AX, Mr. Emke pleaded nolo 

contendere to twenty counts of possession of child pornography.
- 2 -

the terms of his probation. On Mr. Emke's criminal punishment code scoresheet, see 

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.992(a), the trial court designated one count of possession of child 

pornography as the primary offense. The remaining thirty-nine counts of possession of 

child pornography were scored as additional offenses. According to Mr. Emke's 

scoresheet, his lowest permissible sentence, absent a downward departure, was 636.45 

months in prison. The trial court sentenced Mr. Emke to 636.45 months in prison on 

each count.

Mr. Emke raises two issues on appeal. We find no merit as to the first 

issue and affirm without comment the circuit court's decision not to downward depart on 

his sentences. As to his second issue, we affirm the sentences imposed based upon 

our decision in Champagne v. State, 269 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019). But see 

Gabriel v. State, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D2913 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 6, 2019), review granted 

No. SC19-2155, 2020 WL 1888656 (Fla. Apr. 16, 2020).

Affirmed.

MORRIS, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Ex. 99.3

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with the annual report of Stelmar Shipping Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.



/s/ Peter Goodfellow
--------------------
    Peter Goodfellow

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer







02509.0004 #491151
Form 10Q







EXHIBIT 32.02






Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Noland Granberry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.










Date: July 29, 2010


/s/ Noland GranberryNoland GranberryChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.