alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1954

___________________________

Taeng Yang

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Michael McNeill; Seth Wilson; Matthew Toupal; City of St. Paul Police Department

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

Submitted: February 4, 2019

Filed: February 7, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Taeng Yang appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. 1

§ 1983 complaint as time-barred, denied him leave to amend his complaint on

grounds that the proposed amendments would be futile, and denied his post-judgment

motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Upon careful de novo

review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Yang’s complaint

as time-barred. See Humphrey v. Eureka Gardens Pub. Facility Bd., 891 F.3d 1079,

1081 (8th Cir. 2018) (this court reviews de novo whether statute of limitations bars

claim); see also Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388–95 & 395 n.4 (2007) (false-arrest

and false-imprisonment claims accrue when plaintiff becomes held pursuant to legal

process). We further conclude that district court properly denied Yang’s motion for

leave to amend his complaint because his proposed amendments would have been

futile. See Silva v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 762 F.3d 711, 719–20 (8th Cir. 2014)

(district court may properly deny leave to amend complaint when proposed

amendments would be futile; legal conclusions underlying district court’s finding of

futility are reviewed de novo). Finally, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying Yang’s post-judgment motion. See Miller v. Baker

Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review for denial of

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I.

Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
*April 28, 1936.*

#### Pittelkow, Appellant, vs. Bach, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Orth & Orth*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Carl F. Geilfuss,*attorney, and *A. H. Nicolaus*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Analysis of Experimental Data for High Burnup PWR Spent Fuel Isotopic Validation – Calvert Cliffs, Takahama, and Three Mile Island Reactors (NUREG/CR-6968)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6968 (PDF - 23.1 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2009**Date Published:** February 2010

**Prepared by:** G. Ilas, I.C. Gauld, F.C. Difilippo, M.B. Emmett

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

 NRC Job Code Y6685

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report is part of a report series designed to document benchmark-quality radiochemical isotopic assay data against which computer code accuracy can be quantified to establish the uncertainty and bias associated with the code predictions. The experimental data included in the report series were acquired from domestic and international programs and include spent fuel samples that cover a large burnup range. The measurements analyzed in the current report, for which experimental data is publicly available, include 38 spent fuel samples selected from fuel rods with a 2.6 to 4.7 wt % 235U initial enrichment, which were irradiated in three pressurized water reactors operated in the United States and Japan and achieved burnup values from 14 to 56 GWd/MTU. The analysis of the measurements was performed by employing the two-dimensional depletion sequence of the TRITON module in the SCALE code system.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
NovaGold Resources Inc.: Exhibit 4.3 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






CONSENT OF SIMON ALLARD 

In connection with NovaGold Resources Inc.’s take-over bid
circular dated January 18, 2011 (the “Offer and Circular”) and registration
statement on Form F-8 originally dated January 18, 2011, and any amendments
thereto and any registration statements filed pursuant to Rule 429 under the
United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any documents incorporated
by reference therein (the “Registration Statement”), I, Simon Allard, hereby
consent to references to my name and to my involvement in the preparation of a
technical report entitled “Donlin Creek Gold Project, Alaska, USA NI 43-101
Technical Report” dated April 1, 2009 (the “Technical Report”) in the
Registration Statement and the Offer and Circular, and to the inclusion and
incorporation by reference of information derived from the Technical Report in
the Registration Statement and the Offer and Circular. 

DATED: January 18, 2011 

/s/ Simon
Allard          
Name: Simon
Allard
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos               
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Aug-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Sep-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1996
<CASH>                                         7,974
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  855,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    9,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               933,591
<PP&E>                                         1,576,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                 296,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,935,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,088,519
<BONDS>                                        826,837
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,250    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,935,718
<SALES>                                        28,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               887,041
<CGS>                                          27,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               542,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,677
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            123,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
# Events

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 

# Filter Events by:

## No events match your filters.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2168** 

IRIS SAPP GANTT , Plaintiff

– Appellant,

v. COLVIN THOMAS MORGAN, a/k/a Tom Morgan, a/k/a C. T. Morgan, a/k/a Colvin T. Morgan; THURMO MEDICAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC. , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01123

- TDS

- JLW )

Submitted : February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Iris Sapp Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. John F. Bloss, HIGGINS BENJAMIN PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina ; Daniel Charles Nash, MORGAN, HERRING, MORGAN, GREEN & ROSENBLUTT, LLC, High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Iris Sapp Gantt, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing Gantt’s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Durden v. United States , 736 F.3d 296, 300 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating that dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo)
. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gantt v. Morgan , No. 1:12

- cv - 01123

- TDS

- JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsManagement Directives

# Volume 8 - Licensee Oversight Programs

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, February 5, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Volume 1
          - Volume 2
          - Volume 3
          - Volume 4
          - Volume 5
          - Volume 6
          - Volume 7
          - Volume 8
          - Volume 9
          - Volume 10
          - Volume 11
          - Volume 12
          - Volume 13
          - Volume 14

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, February 5, 2024
#### The State, Plaintiff, vs. Groh, Defendant.

*February 13*

March *9, 1926.*

*Automobiles: Drunken drivers: Penalty.*

Questions certified as to the statute governing the penalty for a drunken automobile driver, and the power of the court to prohibit such a person from driving a motor vehicle, answered in accordance with the decision in *Degutes v. State, ante,*p. 435.

Reported from the municipal court of Milwaukee county: George A. Shaughnessy, Judge.

Plaintiff in error was found guilty by a jury of having driven an automobile on the public streets of Milwaukee while intoxicated. Before imposing sentence the trial court certified the following questions to this court, pursuant to the provisions of sec. 358.08 of the Statutes:

I. Should a defendant, convicted for the first time of the offense of operating an automobile upon a public highway of this state while intoxicated, be sentenced under the provisions of section 343.182, Wis. Stats. 1925, or section 85.22 (1), Wis. Stats. 1925?

II. May such defendant also be prohibited from driving any' motor vehicle of any kind for a period of not more than one year under the provisions of section 85.22 (4), Wis. Stats. 1925?

For the plaintiff there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Eugene Wengert,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *George A. Bozvman,*special assistant district attorney, and *C. Stanley Perry,*assistant district attorney; and the cause was argued orally by *Mr. Bozvman*and *Mr. Perry.*

Stevens, J.

The questions here presented were considered and determined in *Degutes v. State, ante,*p. 435, 207 N. W. 948.

*yBy the Court.*— The first question certified is answered *441that sentence should be imposed under sec. 343.182 of the Statutes.

The second question is answered Yes.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  annual  report of The Berkshire Collection, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sandy  Winick,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:     May  11,  2005                 /s/  Sandy  Winick
                                              -------------
                                              Sandy  Winick,
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer  of
                                              The  Berkshire  Collection,  Inc.

<PAGE>
# C_2004118EN.01004002.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/40

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 March 2004

in Case T-139/02, Idiotiko Institouto Epaggelmatikis Katartisis N. Avgerinopoulou Anagnorismenes Technikes Idiotikes Epaggelmatikes Scholes AE, Panellinia Enosi Idiotikon Institouton Epaggelmatikis Katarsis and Panellinia Enosi Idiotikis Technikis Epaggelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katarstisis v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Structural Funds - Community support - Operational programme - Commission's reply to a request for amendment of a decision approving an operational programme - Action for annulment - Direct allocation - Inadmissible)

(2004/C 118/87)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case T-139/02, Idiotiko Institouto Epaggelmatikis Katartisis N. Avgerinopoulou Anagnorismenes Technikes Idiotikes Epaggelmatikes Scholes AE, Panellinia Enosi Idiotikon Institouton Epaggelmatikis Katarsis and Panellinia Enosi Idiotikis Technikis Epaggelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katarstisis, estalblished in Athens, Greece, represented by T. Antoniou and C. Tsiliotis, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Condou-Durande and L. Flynn) - Application for an action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 27 February 2002 not to remove the alleged discrimination between private and public professional training bodies in Greece in regard to their access to financing from the structural funds provided for by the third Community support network and in particular the operational programme Initial Education and Professional Training - the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 15 March 2004, in which it

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and those of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and those of the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C169 of 13.7.2002

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.89

                             SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE



         The undersigned Secretary of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company") hereby certifies that the Amendment
to the 1995 Equity Compensation Plan of the Company attached hereto as Exhibit I
was duly adopted by the directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting of
Directors held on May 15, 1997.

         WITNESS the hand of the undersigned Secretary and the seal of the
Corporation as of this the 15th day of May, 1997




                                         /s/ Fred B. Davenport, Jr.
                                         --------------------------
                                         Fred B. Davenport, Jr.



[CORPORATE SEAL]





<PAGE>   2


                                    Exhibit I

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                    PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, INC.
                          1995 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


         The Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. 1995 Equity Compensation
Plan (the "Plan") is amended as follows:

         1. The references in Sections 2.7 and 2.14 of the Plan to
"Disinterested Person" are changed to "Non-Employee Director".

         2. Section 2.12 of the Plan is revised to read as follows:

"`Non-Employee Director' shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 16b-3 under
the Act."

         3. The last sentence of Section 2.29 of the Plan is deleted.

         4. The second sentence of Section 15.5 of the Plan is rewritten as
follows:

"In addition to any other restrictions upon transferability herein, Incentive
Stock Options shall be subject to such further restrictions as required by
Federal or state securities and tax laws or provided by the Committee or in an
Award Agreement."

         The Plan, as herein amended, shall continue in full force and effect.

         This First Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors of
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc., upon recommendation of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, on this 15th day of May, 1997.





                                     /s/ Fred B. Davenport, Jr.
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Fred B. Davenport, Jr., Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

                              POST HOUSE INVESTORS
                               11 EAST 44TH STREET
                             NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

                                                        April 20, 2001

The Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group
F/K/A New York Restaurant Group, Inc.
1114 First Avenue
New York, NY 10021

Gentlemen:

        We are the parties to a restaurant management agreement dated
February 26, 1991, as amended by agreements dated December 12, 1994, October
29, 1996, November 11, 1998 and December 25, 2000.

        We wish this document to serve as a fifth amendment to the restaurant
management agreement, and hereby amend the agreement only as specifically set
forth herein.

        We hereby acknowledge that New York Restaurant Group, Inc. is now
known as The Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc., and is the same
entity. Further references in this letter, and in future amendments and
correspondence, shall be to The Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group.

        The restaurant management agreement shall also be amended by deleting
paragraph 7(f) and replacing it with a new paragraph 7(f):

                "7(f) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, at the election of the Chartounis on 30 days' notice in the event
of a sale of the restaurant or if SWRG or any successor thereto ceases
substantially to perform its duties and responsibilities (including
maintaining the current general atmosphere and administering cost controls)
under this Agreement to Chartounis' satisfaction in their sole and absolute
discretion"

                                        Very Truly Yours,
                                        Post House Investors, LP

                                        By:  /s/ Nabil N. Chartouni
                                        ------------------------------
                                                 Nabil N. Chartouni

Contents agreed to:
The Smith & Wollensky
Restaurant Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Alan M. Mandel
    ---------------------------
    Alan M. Mandel
    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. RICHARD BROADUS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 451 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERG                              
| |                                                      
| | Katherine Greenberg                                  
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

Date: June 28, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 13, 2015

NO. 03-14-00597-CV

C. S. F., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 15, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.