alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# FLAME Facility: The Effect of Obstacles and Transverse Venting on Flame Acceleration and Transition to Detonation for Hydrogen-Air Mixtures at Large Scale (NUREG/CR-5275)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5275 (PDF - 8.64 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1989**Date Published:**April 1989

**Prepared by:**M. P. Sherman, S. R. Tieszen, W. B. Benedick

Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, NM 87185

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems ResearchOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

NRC FIN A1246

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes research on flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) for hydrogen-air mixtures carried out in the FLAME facility, and describes its relevance to nuclear reactor safety. Flame acceleration and DDT can generate high peak pressures that may cause failure of containment. FLAME is a large rectangular channel 30.5 m long, 2.44 m high, and 1.83 m wide. It is closed on the ignition end and open on the far end. The three test variables were hydrogen mole fraction (12 - 30%), degree of transverse venting (by moving steel top plates - 0%, 13%, and 50%), and the absence or presence of certain obstacles in the channel (zero or 33% blockage ratio). The most important variable was the hydrogen mole fraction. The presence of the obstacles tested greatly increased the flame speeds, overpressures, and tendency for DDT compared to similar tests without obstacles. Different obstacle configurations could have greater or lesser effects on flame acceleration and DDT. Large degrees of transverse venting reduced the flame speeds, overpressures, and possibility of DDT. For small degrees of transverse venting (13% top venting), the flame speeds and overpressures were higher than for no transverse venting with reactive mixtures (> 18% H ), but they were lower with leaner mixtures. The effect ol the turbulence generated by the flow out the vents on increasing flame speed can be larger than the effect of venting gas out of the channel and hence reducing the overpressure. With no obstacles and 50% top venting, the flame speeds and overpressures were low, and there was no DDT. For all other cases, DDT was observed above some threshold hydrogen concentration. DDT was obtained at 15% H2 with obstacles and no transverse venting.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# Air Filtration and Scrubbing (No.) (371) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Air Filtration and Scrubbing (No.) (371) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Air Filtration and Scrubbing (No.) (371) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our FOTG website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Air Filtration and Scrubbing (No.) (371) (7/2021) Standard Document(799.84 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Air Filtration and Scrubbing Conservation Practice Overview(4.22 MB)

Air Filtration and Scrubbing Conservation Practice Physical Effects Worksheet(24.14 KB)

Air Filtration and Scrubbing Network Effects Diagram(77.76 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Jacob Inbar, Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications Inc.,(the “Company”), certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMLCommunications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: February 14, 2006 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/: Jacob Inbar        |   |   |
| By: Jacob Inbar         |   |
| Chief Executive Office  |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1662 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking in any facility 

of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2017 

Mr. WENSTRUP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking 

in any facility of the Veterans Health Administration, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN FACILITIES OF 

4 THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 1715 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1662 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the 

2 Veterans Health Administration 

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—(1) No person may smoke in4 doors in any facility of the Veterans Health Administra5 tion. 

6 ‘‘(2) No person may smoke outdoors in any facility 

7 of the Veterans Health Administration on or after October 

8 1, 2022. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

10 ‘‘(1) The term ‘smoke’ includes the smoking of 

11 cigarettes (including e-cigarettes or electronic ciga12 rettes), cigars, pipes, and any other combustion of 

13 tobacco. 

14 ‘‘(2) The term ‘facility of the Veterans Health 

15 Administration’ means any land or building (includ16 ing any medical center, nursing home, domiciliary 

17 facility, outpatient clinic, or center that provides re18 adjustment counseling) that is— 

19 ‘‘(A) under the jurisdiction of the Depart20 ment of Veterans Affairs; 

21 ‘‘(B) under the control of the Veterans 

22 Health Administration; and 

23 ‘‘(C) not under the control of the General 

24 Services Administration.’’. 

25 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1662 IH

1 (1) The table of sections at the beginning of 

2 chapter 17 of such title is amended by striking the 

3 item relating to section 1715 and inserting the fol4 lowing: 

‘‘1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health Administration.’’. 

5 (2) Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care 

6 Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–585) is repealed. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

8 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Contour Farming (Ac.) (330).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) (10/17) Standard Document(73.98 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) Overview(225.64 KB)

Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) CPPE(46.25 KB)

Contour Farming (Ac.) (330) ND(63.82 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Wendy
F. DiCicco, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kensey Nash Corporation;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      May 10, 2005
    /s/
      Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
      Wendy
      F. DiCicco, CPA
      Chief
      Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffAnnual Evaluation Plan (NUREG-2250)

# Annual Evaluation Plan: Fiscal Year 2025 (NUREG-2250, Volume 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2250, Volume 3 (PDF – 23.98 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**February 2024

Office of the Executive Director for OperationsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the agency) is an independent agency established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. The NRC began operations in 1975 as a successor to the Atomic Energy Commission. The agency is required by the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Evidence Act) to develop an annual evaluation plan. This iteration of the annual evaluation plan provides summary information on evaluations that the NRC plans to initiate in fiscal year (FY) 2025, as well as the status of evaluations initiated in previous fiscal years. The Evidence Act defines an "evaluation" as "an assessment using systematic data collection and analysis of one or more programs, policies, and organizations intended to assess their effectiveness and efficiency." The evaluations being conducted will assist in answering priority questions established in the Evidence-Building Plan, addressing mitigating strategies for findings discussed in the NRC Capacity Assessment, or meeting other evaluation needs determined to be significant, such as those required by statute or those of high value to the agency. This evaluation plan includes the discussion of two newly planned evaluations to be initiated in FY 2025: an evaluation of the NRC’s external stakeholder engagement practices and an evaluation of the NRC Future-Focused Research Program. This evaluation plan also provides a summary of other evaluations that are either planned or currently in progress, as discussed in the NRC’s evaluation plans for prior fiscal years.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 29, 2024
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I Robert
A. Ferguson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, that to our knowledge:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     registrant.


Date: August 9, 2004
                                 /s/ ROBERT A. FERGUSON
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Robert A. Ferguson
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2015157EN.01005001.xml

| 23.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/50

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/971

of 22 June 2015

amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation, by 31 December 2015, of the Minsk agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation, by 31 December 2015, of the Minsk agreements.

| (3) | Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further 6 months in order to enable the Council to assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further 6 months in order to enable the Council to assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.

| (4) | Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘1.   This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2016.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 June 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13).

1

---
#### Bludau, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *B. R. Perrigo,*attorney, and *John S. Barry*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *Orland S. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer*Levitan, assistant attorney general.

For the respondents Yahr-Lange, Inc., and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company: *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *E. LI. Bor gelt*and *Lawson Adams*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 28, 2015.

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01151

- CR

SAMUEL FRANCO, A ppellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 41032

- M



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the

motion. Th e Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS th at the appeal be DISMISSED and

this decision be certified below for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

151151F.U05

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SAMUEL FRANCO, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 01151

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th J udicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 41032

- M.

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices

Lang, Evans, and Whitehill.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 28th day of September, 2015.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 3 - Fuels and Materials Facilities

# Fuels and Materials Facilities (Division 3): Regulatory Guides 3.21 - 3.40

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 3, "Fuels and Materials Facilities," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 3.1 - 3.20
          - Regulatory Guides 3.21 - 3.40
          - Regulatory Guides 3.41 - 3.60
          - Regulatory Guides 3.61 - 3.77

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024