alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Heera Lee, certifythat:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.     Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 20, 2007
| /s/ Heera Lee                 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| By: Heera Lee                 |
| Director of  Finance and      |
| Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Environmental Impact Statement for Construction Permit for the Northwest Medical Isotopes Radioisotope Production Facility, Final Report (NUREG-2209)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2209 (PDF – 18.47 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2017**Date Published:** May 2017

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has prepared this environmental impact statement (EIS) in response to an application submitted by Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI) for a construction permit for the NWMI medical radioisotope production facility. The EIS includes the analysis that evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed action and considers the following alternatives to the proposed action: (1) the no-action alternative (i.e., the construction permit is denied), (2) one alternative site, and (3) two alternative technologies.

After weighing the environmental, economic, technical, and other benefits against environmental and other costs, and considering reasonable alternatives, the NRC staff's recommendation, unless safety issues mandate otherwise, is to issue a construction permit to NWMI. The NRC staff based its recommendation on the following factors:
        - the NRC staff's review of the NWMI Environmental Report and responses to requests for additional information;
        - the NRC staff's consultation with Federal, State, and local agencies and Tribal officials;
        - the NRC staff's independent environmental review; and
        - the NRC staff's consideration of public comments.

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Jacob Inbar, Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications Inc.,(the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of AMLCommunications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date: April 18, 2005    | By: Jacob Inbar |
|-------------------------|-----------------|
| /s/ Jacob Inbar         |            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |            |
|                         |                 |  |

 

----
#### STATE v. STEPHEN HOLDER.

*Dogs*— Larceny.

Dogs arc not the subject of larceny in this state.

INDICTMENT for Larceny, tried at Spring Term, 1879, of Davidson Superior Court, before *Schenck, J.*

The bill of indictment charged the defendant Stephen Holder *alias*Stephen Phillips, with stealing “ one dog of the value of one dollar,” the property of oneT. T. Spaugh. The defendant’s counsel moved to quash the indictment on the ground that it did not charge an indictable offence. The motion was allowed, and *Dobson,*solicitor for the state, appealed. (See *State*v. *House,*65 N C., 815; *Latham,*13 Ire., 33.)

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*528No counsel in this court for the defendant.

Ashe, J.

The defendant was indicted for stealing a dog. It is no offence at common law. 4 Bl. Com., 236; Arch. Cr. Pl., 175; 1 Hale P. C., 512. The common law is the law of this state, except where altered by statute; and we have no statute making it larceny to steal a dog ; therefore, the indictment cannot be sustained.

There is no error. Let this be certified to the superior court of Davidson county.

No error. Affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Recruiter Handbook And Information Guide (NUREG/BR-0357)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document 
        - NUREG/BR-0357 (PDF - 634.42 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 2008

Office of Human Resources U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

Thank you for your commitment to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Recruitment Program. Your participation and support will ensure the NRC remains the best place to work in the Federal Government, as indicated in the 2007 rankings by the Partnership for Public Service. Our ability to attract highly skilled, culturally diverse candidates is largely attributable to our recruiters’ active participation in the process.

The NRC’s most significant organizational asset is its employees. Therefore, it is paramount that the NRC recruit, hire, and retain talented and gifted professionals. Recruiters identify students and experienced professionals who possess unique skills, talents, and knowledge critical to the NRC’s continued success. Recruiters explain the Agency’s mission, challenges, and expectations to potential employees and direct the best of the best to the NRC.

The information in this booklet will inform recruiters about the NRC Recruitment Program, our retention incentives, and other factors key to identifying, cultivating, and retaining a superior workforce. This booklet also defines best practices in recruiting and retaining a high quality and diverse staff.

Winning the race for talent in today’s job market demands forecasting future skill-set needs and developing a proactive, targeted recruitment strategy to fill them. It is important to understand that attracting new generations of workers calls for new recruiting strategies.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Ronald Jankov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RONALD JANKOVRonald Jankov President and Chief Executive Officer March 2, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2015234EN.01002701.xml

| 8.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/27

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/603 of 13 April 2015 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2-naphthyloxyacetic acid, acetochlor, chloropicrin, diflufenican, flurprimidol, flutolanil and spinosad in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 100 of 17 April 2015
  )

On page 12, in Article 2 and Article 3, in the second paragraph:

for:

‘
  7 December 2015
  ’;

read:

‘
  7 November 2015
  ’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001003390
<NAME>                        FIRST SOUTH AFRICA CORP., LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           2,245,322
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                   11,241,016
<ALLOWANCES>                       531,110
<INVENTORY>                      6,740,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                20,706,053
<PP&E>                          17,018,680
<DEPRECIATION>                   5,888,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  42,832,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           19,073,333
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            41,857
<OTHER-SE>                      19,465,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    42,832,702
<SALES>                         44,536,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                44,536,940
<CGS>                           24,545,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   40,594,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (500,521)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 770,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,771,719
<INCOME-TAX>                       794,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,972,589
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,972,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .61
        


</TABLE>
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)National Source Tracking System (NSTS)

# NSTS Overview

The NSTS is essential for national security. It is a secure user friendly web-based database designed to track Category 1 and 2 radioactive sources regulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Agreement States. The tracking spans the life cycle of the source from manufacture through shipment receipt, decay and burial. NSTS enhances the ability of the NRC and Agreement States to conduct inspections and investigations, communicate information to other government agencies, and verify legitimate ownership and use of nationally tracked sources. NSTS meets the U.S. Government's commitment to implement a national source registry, as described in the *Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources*, which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued in January 2004.

The Interim Data Base (IDB) was created in 2005 as a precursor to the NSTS to collect an initial inventory of sources containing the materials of greatest concern. This inventory was developed to create a snapshot of licensees, facilities, and the sources they possess. This effort established contact with licensees who would later participate in implementing the NSTS.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 7, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - NSTS Login
          - National Source Tracking System: Blog
          - NSTS Overview
          - Background
          - Get Credentialed to Access NSTS
          - How to Report to NSTS
          - Resources  for Online Reporting
          - NSTS Expansion
          - Annual Inventory Reconciliation
          - NSTS Presentations
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Help Desk Support
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 7, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           960,054
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          7,971
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            7,820
<EQUITIES>                                     45,809
<MORTGAGE>                                     26,832
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,071,681
<CASH>                                         19,190
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             24,748
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         17,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,261,798
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                426,021
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            74,364
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          545,487
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,830
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,261,798
<PREMIUMS>                                     216,720
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            58,558
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,984)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,569
<BENEFITS>                                     180,219
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    38,182
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           20,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,896
<EPS-BASIC>                                  3.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.13
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 174,435
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            146,829
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (5,320)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             70,463
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               (5,320)
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                186,130
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        7,222


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00065-CV

John Andrew Rankin

v.

Texas Department of Public Safety

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-14-4287-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 2, 2016
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Spent Fuel Transportation Risk Assessment – Final Report (NUREG-2125)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2125 (PDF - 39.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2013**Date Published:**January 2014

John R. Cook, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is responsible for issuing regulations for the packaging of spent fuel (and other large quantities of radioactive material) for transport that provide for public health and safety during transport (Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 71, “Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Waste,” dated January 26, 2004). In September 1977, the NRC published NUREG-0170, “Final Environmental Statement on the Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air and Other Modes,” which assessed the adequacy of those regulations to provide safety assurance. In that assessment, the measure of safety was the risk of radiation doses to the public under routine and accident transport conditions, and the risk was found to be acceptable. Since that time, there have been two affirmations of this conclusion for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) transportation, each using improved tools and information. This report presents the results of a fourth investigation into the safety of SNF transportation. The risks associated with SNF transportation come from the radiation that the spent fuel emits, which is attenuated—but not eliminated—by the transportation casks shielding and the possibility of the release of some quantity of radioactive material during a severe accident. This investigation shows that the risk from the radiation emitted from the casks is a small fraction of naturally occurring background radiation and the risk from accidental release of radioactive material is several orders of magnitude less. Because there have been only minor changes to the radioactive material transportation regulations between NUREG-0170 and this risk assessment, the calculated dose caused by the external radiation from the cask under routine transport conditions is similar to what was found in earlier studies. The improved analysis tools and techniques, improved data availability, and a reduction in uncertainty has made the estimate of accident risk from the release of radioactive material in this study approximately five orders of magnitude less than what was estimated in NUREG-0170. The results demonstrate that NRC regulations continue to provide adequate protection of public health and safety during the transportation of SNF.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021