alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,087,366              26,320,519
<SECURITIES>                                    14,531                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,792,663              13,375,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   651,311                 722,036
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,177,026              42,282,690
<PP&E>                                       6,081,072               9,959,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,401,956               5,914,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,315,042              53,197,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,704,179              14,378,572
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,802,120                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,055                   9,987
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,803,688              38,809,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,315,042              53,197,777
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,887,888              46,903,383
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,853,462               6,928,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,140,416              35,313,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               400,929                 478,169
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (272,405)               (458,058)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,792,065               4,641,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,172,692               1,949,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,619,373               2,692,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22                    0.34


</TABLE>
#### JOHN H. PASCHAL v. H. F. BRANDON, Adm’r, and others.

*Parties*— Action *for Purchase Money of Land.*

1. A vendor of land can not maintain a suit for the purchase money without first tendering a good and sufficient title to the vendee.

2. If the vendee die before payment of the purchase money, the deed’ should be tendered to the heirs, and they should be parties defendant to a suit for the price of the land.

*(Hutchinson*v. *Smith,*68 N. C. 354, cited and approved.)

*505Civil Action tried at Eall Term, 1877, of Caswell Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

The plaintiff brought this action to recover the purchase money for land alleged tobe due him by the defendants, Elisha Paschal, the intestate of defendant, and Elisha Sar-tain. It was admitted that defendant’s intestate had paid the plaintiff the sum he was due him on account of the purchase, but had received no deed for his part of the land *;*and it was alleged that the defendant Elisha Sartain had not paid the sum due for his part thereof, the defendants being joint purchasers. After the death of Sartain, Brandon was also appointed his administrator, and the ease was referred and an award made. Upon the coming in of the report of the referee, the heirs at laws of said Sartain were' made parties defendant, and the award vacated. The heirs of Elisha Paschal were already defendants in this action. The Court held also that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover unless he made a proper deed for the land, and the plaintiff appealed. The case was argued in this Court by *Mr. J. W.*Graham, for plaintiff, 'and *Mr. Thos. Ruffin,*for defendants.

Reade, J.

It is too plain to need either argument or authority that the vendor of land is not entitled to recover the price until he tenders a good and sufficient title to the ven-dee. And whether the title tendered is good and sufficient is a question which the vendee has the right to contest with the vendor.

Elisha Sartain the vendee in the case before us is dead,, and the vendor plaintiff sues the administrator of Elisha Sartain for the price. The plaintiff can not recover without tendering title. The title when tendered must be, not to the administrator, but to the heirs at law of Elisha Sartain. And of course they must be parties.

This is the only question before us, for it follows that the reference and award made when the heirs were not parties *506must be set aside. When the heirs are made parties, if the administrator will not put in the proper defences to protect their rights, they must be permitted to do so.

When we had separate Courts of Law and Equity, if the plaintiff had sued at law for his claim, it would have required the intervention of the Court of Equity on the part of the heirs, but now all the rights of both parties both legal and equitable can be administered in this action. *Hutchinson*v. *Smith*68 N. C., 354.

No Error. Affirmed.
# C_2004179EN.01000202.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Länsrätten i Stockholms län by order of that court of 20 April 2004 in the proceedings between Ulf Öberg and Stockholms läns allmänna försäkringskassa

(Case C-185/04)

(2004/C 179/04)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Länsrätten i Stockholms län of 20 April 2004, received at the Court Registry on 22 April 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Ulf Öberg and Stockholms läns allmänna försäkringskassa on the following questions:

| (i) | Is a requirement in national legislation that a parent have been resident and be covered by health insurance in the Member State in question for at least 240 days prior to the child's birth in order to be entitled to parental benefit in accordance with the parent's sickness benefit compatible with Articles 12, 17(2), 18 and 39 EC, Article 7(1) and 7(2) of Regulation No 1612/68 (1) and Directive No 96/34 (2) on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC? |
| --- | --- |

(i)

Is a requirement in national legislation that a parent have been resident and be covered by health insurance in the Member State in question for at least 240 days prior to the child's birth in order to be entitled to parental benefit in accordance with the parent's sickness benefit compatible with Articles 12, 17(2), 18 and 39 EC, Article 7(1) and 7(2) of Regulation No 1612/68 (1) and Directive No 96/34 (2) on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC?

1

2

| (ii) | If question (i) is answered in the affirmative: does Community law require that, in the determination of whether the worker fulfils the qualification period for insurance under national law, cumulation shall take place with a period during which the worker was covered by the Joint Sickness insurance scheme pursuant to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities? |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

If question (i) is answered in the affirmative: does Community law require that, in the determination of whether the worker fulfils the qualification period for insurance under national law, cumulation shall take place with a period during which the worker was covered by the Joint Sickness insurance scheme pursuant to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities?

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (English special edition: Series I Chapter 1968(II), p. 475).

1

(2)  Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 (OJ 1996 L 145, p. 4).

2

---
# C_2004118EN.01003503.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-304/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 118/69)

By order of 26 April 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-304/03: Commission of the European Communities v PROSECOM – Protecção, Segurança e Comunicações, L da.

da.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003

1

---
# Access Control (Ac.) (472) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Access Control (Ac.) (472) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national Access Control (Ac.) (472) conservation practice standard and supporting documents.

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our FOTG website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Access Control (Ac.) (472) (10/17) Standard Document(54.14 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Access Control Conservation Practice Overview(249.49 KB)

Access Control Conservation Practice Physical Effects Worksheet(26.68 KB)

Access Control Network Effects Diagram(49.67 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Access Control

This video explores how Forrest Pritchard implemented access control on his farm in Berryville, Virginia.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Seismic Considerations for the Transition Break Size (NUREG-1903)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1903 (PDF - 15.4 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2008**Date Published:** February 2008

**Prepared by:** N.C. Chokshi, S.K. Shaukat, A.L. Hiser/U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission G. DeGrassi/Brookhaven National Laboratory G. Wilkowski/Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus R. Olson/Battelle J.J. Johnson/James J. Johnson & Associates

Brookhaven National Laboratory Building 130 P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973

Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus 3518 Riverside Drive, Suite 202 Columbus, OH 43221-1735

Battelle 505 King Avenue Columbus, OH 43201-2693

James J. Johnson & Associates 7 Essex Court Alamo, CA 94507

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been considering revision of the regulatory requirements for the emergency core cooling system (ECCS), as set forth in Title 10, Section 50.46, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50.46); Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50; and General Design Criterion (GDC) 35. In particular, those requirements state that the ECCS shall be sized to provide adequate makeup water to compensate for a break of the largest diameter pipe in the primary system [i.e., the so-called "double-ended guillotine break" (DEGB)]. Consequently, in order to risk-inform the break size, the staff of the NRC proposed the concept of transition break size (TBS). In addition, the NRC developed pipe break frequencies as a function of break size using an expert elicitation process for degradation-related pipe breaks in reactor coolant systems of typical boiling- and pressurized-water reactors. That elicitation focused on determining event frequencies that initiate by unisolable primary side failures that can be exacerbated by material degradation with age under normal operating conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess potential seismic effects on the postulated TBS, and to provide information to facilitate review and comment regarding the proposed risk-informed revision of ECCS requirements in 10 CFR 50.46. Thus, this report evaluates the seismic effects, using different approaches to evaluate flawed and unflawed piping, and indirect failures of other components and component supports that could lead to piping failure.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 19-20, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Frank S. De Silva, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892-7616, 240-669-5023,                         *fdesilva@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2015.

David Clary,

 Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-01360 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








The
      undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
      that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as
      an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
      “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








Date:
      July 10, 2007


/s/
      ROBERT A.
      FERGUSON


Robert
      A.
      Ferguson


President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
# C_2004179EN.01001402.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/14

---

Action brought on 12 May 2004 by Calliope S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

(Case T-169/04)

(2004/C 179/28)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 12 May 2004 by Calliope S.A., established in Mourenx (France), represented by Stéphanie Legrand, lawyer.

BASF AG was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 4 March 2004 dismissing appeal No R 289/2003-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 4 March 2004 dismissing appeal No R 289/2003-1;

| — | order the OHIM to register the application for Community trade mark ‘CARPOVIRUSINE’ No 1 422 641 for the goods referred to in the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to register the application for Community trade mark ‘CARPOVIRUSINE’ No 1 422 641 for the goods referred to in the application;

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | Applicant |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘CARPOVIRUSINE’ – application No 1 422 641 in respect of goods in Class 5 (insecticides etc.) |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | BASF AG |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National and international word mark ‘CARPO’ for goods in Class 5 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |
| Pleas in law: | Wrongful application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 1 |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

Applicant

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark ‘CARPOVIRUSINE’ – application No 1 422 641 in respect of goods in Class 5 (insecticides etc.)

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

BASF AG

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

National and international word mark ‘CARPO’ for goods in Class 5

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:

Wrongful application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 1

1

---

(1)   Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11 of 14.01.94, pp. 1-36).

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2021

# Recent FOIA Requests – March 2021

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during March 2021. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 6, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 6, 2021