alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004143EN.01000101.xml

| 27.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2004

(2004/C 143/01)

1 euro
  =

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0893 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5276 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,22 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1993 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9475 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5844 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,625 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6576 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4254 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6455 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 766 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,03 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,99 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 831 286 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6611 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5122 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9291 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,072 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2198

JPY

Japanese yen

133,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66475

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0893

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5276

ISK

Iceland króna

87,22

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1993

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9475

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5844

CZK

Czech koruna

31,625

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6576

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4254

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6455

ROL

Romanian leu

40 766

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,03

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,99

TRL

Turkish lira

1 831 286

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6611

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5122

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9291

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,072

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,9345

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### State, Plaintiff, vs. Farber and others, Defendants.

*November 12*

December *9, 1927.*

Companion case to *State v. Van Brocklin, ante,*p. 441.

Certified question from the circuit court for Winnebago county: Fred Beglinger, Circuit Judge.

*Answered Yes.*

For the plaintiff there was a brief by *Frank B. Keefe,*district attorney of Winnebago county, the *Attorney General,*and *J. E. Messerschmidi,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Keefe*and *Mr. Messer schmidi.*

For the defendants there was a brief by *Reilly & O’Brien*of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by /. *E. O’Brien.*

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to *State v. Van Brocklin, ante,*p. 441, 217 N. W. 277. The defendants were convicted of violations of the prohibition law, and the trial court certified to this court a question substantially similar to that certified and considered in *State v. Van Brocklin.*That case is decisive of this, and the question is answered in the affirmative.

Eschweiler and Crownhart, JJ., dissent.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 4.1.2


               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                       Capitalization 30,000,000 shares        CUSIP 456806 10 8
                            PREFERRED STOCK SERIES A
                               at $.001 Par Value

NUMBER                                                                    SHARES

                                INFOTOPIA, INC.

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF

               SHARES OF INFOTOPIA, INC. SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

          WITNESS the signatures of its duly authorized officers this


 /s/ Marek A. Lozowicki          [INFOTOPIA, INC.         /s/ Ernest Zavoral
      SECRETARY                 CORPORATE SEAL 1998]           PRESIDENT
<PAGE>   2
     For Value Received, _________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


________________________________________________________________________________
  (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)


________________________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________________________


_________________________________________________________________________ Shares
of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint


_______________________________________________________________________ Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated _________________________________


     _______________________________________________________________________
     NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
             AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR
             WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER
#### Estate of Post: Post, Proponent, Respondent, vs. Smith and another, Contestants, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Gooding & Gooding*of Fond du Lac.

For the respondent: *John P. McGalloway*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Technical Bases for Consequence Analyses Using MACCS (MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System) (NUREG/CR-7270, SAND2022-12166 R)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7270 (PDF – 5.06 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2022**Date Published:** October 2022**Prepared by:**N. Bixler1, K. Compton2, M. Dennis1, L. Eubanks3, R. Haaker4,J. Jones1, M. Kimura5, K. McFadden6, A. Nosek2, A. Outkin1, andF. Walton11Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)2United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)3Architrave Software Inc.4AQ Safety, Inc.5Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)6Sigma Software, LLCJ. Barr, NRC Project ManagerA. Sharp, NRC Project ManagerS. Haq, NRC Project ManagerA. Nosek, NRC Technical MonitorK. Compton, NRC Technical Monitor**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The use of MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS) in regulatory applications requires that input parameters used in MACCS models have a defensible and transparent technical basis. The existing technical basis for MACCS parameters was identified and updates were developed based on current data and information. The transparent way these updates are documented provides a technical basis for updating MACCS parameters with consistent application among the MACCS user community.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, October 27, 2022
# Michigan State Office

3001 Coolidge RdSuite 250East LansingMI48823-6349

517-324-5270

3001 Coolidge RdSuite 250East LansingMI48823-6349

Michigan

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Michigan 
-  Michigan State Office 

Contact information for the Michigan State Office and state management team.

## Welcome to NRCS in Michigan!

### Garry Lee, State Conservationist

Michigan NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, XXXX

----

**NRCS Michigan Field Offices**

##   State Office Employee Directory
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60665

Summary Calendar

__________________

ALBERT JAMES WATTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILLY RAY EVANS,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

(4:95-CV-14LN)

______________________________________________

April 11, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Albert James Watts, a Mississippi state prisoner, appeals the

district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sheriff

Evans in this civil rights suit in which Watts alleged an Eighth

Amendment excessive force claim. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm for

the following reasons.

Watts failed to rebut with any competent summary judgment

proof Evans' showing that there was no material issue of fact
2

regarding Watts' having "some injury." See Rankin v. Klevenhagen,

5 F.3d 103, 108 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, we do not consider

Watts' claim that he suffers emotional problems because he raises

it for the first time on appeal. Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320,

321 (5th Cir. 1991). 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2004144EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2004

(2004/C 144/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0893 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5276 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,22 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1993 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9475 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5844 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,625 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6576 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4254 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6455 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 766 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,03 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,99 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 831 286 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6611 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5122 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9291 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,072 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 415,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2198

JPY

Japanese yen

133,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66475

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0893

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5276

ISK

Iceland króna

87,22

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1993

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9475

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5844

CZK

Czech koruna

31,625

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6576

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4254

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6455

ROL

Romanian leu

40 766

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,03

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,99

TRL

Turkish lira

1 831 286

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6611

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5122

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9291

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,072

KRW

South Korean won

1 415,03

ZAR

South African rand

7,9345

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2019 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2019

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain abortions 
   from the definition of qualified medical expenses for purposes of 
              distributions from health savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

   Ms. Foxx (for herself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain abortions 
   from the definition of qualified medical expenses for purposes of 
              distributions from health savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN ABORTIONS FROM QUALIFIED MEDICAL 
              EXPENSES FOR PURPOSES OF HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 223(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
                    ``(D) Certain abortions.--For purposes of this 
                section, the term `qualified medical expenses' shall 
                not include amounts paid for any abortion unless--
                            ``(i) the pregnancy is the result of an act 
                        of rape or incest, or
                            ``(ii) the woman suffers from a physical 
                        disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, 
                        including a life-endangering physical condition 
                        caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, 
                        that would, as certified by a physician, place 
                        the woman in danger of death unless an abortion 
                        is performed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years beginning after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1804 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1804

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 3-year recovery 
                      period for all race horses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mr. Barr introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 3-year recovery 
                      period for all race horses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Race Horse Cost Recovery Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR DEPRECIATION FOR RACE HORSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 168(e)(3)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) any race horse,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.4

INTERNAL CONTROLS CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jack M. Rapport, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zanett, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have;
      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            annual report is being prepared;
      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
            controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
            filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
      c)    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
            our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
      a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
            internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
            ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
            and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
            weaknesses in internal controls; and
      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  April 15, 2003

/s/ Jack M. Rapport
Jack M. Rapport
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
# L_2015189EN.01004202.xml

| 17.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/42

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/228 of 17 February 2015 replacing Annexes I to VII to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 49 of 20 February 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 49 of 20 February 2015

On page 21, Annex III, point 2.2.2.3:

for:

‘☐ Belgium ☐ Bulgaria ☐ Czech Republic ☐ Germany ☐ Estonia ☐ Ireland ☐ Greece ☐ Spain ☐ France ☐ Croatia ☐ Italy ☐ Cyprus ☐ Latvia ☐ Lithuania ☐ Luxembourg ☐ Hungary ☐ Malta ☐ Netherlands ☐ Austria ☐ Poland ☐ Portugal ☐ Romania ☐ Slovenia ☐ Finland ☐ Sweden’,

read:

‘☐ Belgium ☐ Bulgaria ☐ Czech Republic ☐ Germany ☐ Estonia ☐ Ireland ☐ Greece ☐ Spain ☐ France ☐ Croatia ☐ Italy ☐ Cyprus ☐ Latvia ☐ Lithuania ☐ Luxembourg ☐ Hungary ☐ Malta ☐ Netherlands ☐ Austria ☐ Poland ☐ Portugal ☐ Romania ☐ Slovenia ☐ Slovakia ☐ Finland ☐ Sweden’.

---
# National Soil Survey Center

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Soil 
-  National Soil Survey Center 

The National Soil Survey Center manages the national soils, laboratory, ecological, and botanical databases—the world’s largest collection of natural resources data!

**Address**

100 Centennial Mall North, Room 152Lincoln, NE 68508-3866

Phone: 402-437-5499

Jump to Service Region Liaisons

----

##   Employee Directory

----

##   NSSC-Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory Liaisons

##   Additional Information

### Soil Science

NRCS delivers science-based soil information to help farmers, ranchers, foresters, and other land managers effectively manage, conserve, and appraise their most valuable investment — the soil.
Learn More

##   Contact Soils

Please contact us if you see something that needs to be updated, if you have any questions, or if you need accessibility assistance.
                  -    Soils Webmaster 
                  -    402-437-5499 
                  -    Soils-Webmaster@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
DENY; and Opinion Filed March 6, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00223-CV

No. 05-15-00224-CV

IN RE JOHN CLOUD, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F93-61603-N, F93-61604-N

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Brown, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Brown

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining that although he filed a 

motion for forensic DNA testing pursuant to chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure on December 23, 2014, the trial court has not determined whether reasonable grounds 

exist for the filing of the motion, has not determined whether relator is indigent and has not 

appointed counsel for the proceeding. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp.

2014) (“The convicting court shall appoint counsel for the convicted person if the person informs 

the court that the person wishes to submit a motion under this chapter, the court finds reasonable 

grounds for a motion to be filed, and the court determines that the person is indigent.”). Relator 

was convicted of aggravated sexual assault on a child under age fourteen and sentenced to life 

imprisonment in each case. Cloud v. State, 05-96-00732-CR, 1998 WL 227941, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas May 8, 1998, pet. ref'd). We affirmed the convictions. Id.
–2–

On three previous occasions, this Court has affirmed the trial court’s denial of relator’s 

request for forensic DNA testing of the material that is the subject of relator’s current motion for 

forensic DNA testing. See Cloud v. State, Nos. 05-13-01235-CR & 05-13-01237-CR, 2014 WL 

1413818, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 26, 2014, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication); Cloud v. State, Nos. 05–07–01414–CR & 05–07–01415–CR, 2008 WL 3020817 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 6, 2008, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication); Cloud v. State,

Nos. 05–03–01146–CR & 05–03–01162–CR, 2004 WL 1615832 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 20, 

2004, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandamus record does not 

present a ground for the relief relator seeks. In re Sims, No. 05-13-00049-CV, 2013 WL 

1273912, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 15, 2013, orig. proceeding) (“Relator is not entitled to a 

writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to repeatedly rule on the same motion.”); In re 

Durden, No. 14-12-00143-CR, 2012 WL 590815, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 

23, 2012, orig. proceeding) (“[N]o ruling is required in response to a subsequent filing of a 

motion for DNA testing if there has already been a full adjudication in connection with a prior 

motion for DNA testing, absent exceptional circumstances.”); In re Birdwell, 393 S.W.3d 886, 

893 (Tex. App.—Waco 2012, no pet.) (Gray, C.J. concurring) (denying mandamus compelling 

ruling on tenth motion for forensic DNA testing). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

150223F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE