alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6468-6469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02239]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2015-C-0245]


Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

[[Page 6469]]


ACTION: Notice of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing 
that we have filed a petition, submitted by Signature Brands, LLC, 
proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for 
the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits 
for coloring shell eggs.

DATES: The color additive petition was filed on December 22, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1309.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice 
that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 5C0301), submitted by 
Signature Brands, LLC, c/o Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G Street NW., 
Suite 500 West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend 
the color additive regulations in Sec.  73.350 Mica-based pearlescent 
pigments (21 CFR 73.350), to provide for the safe use of mica-based 
pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits for coloring shell eggs.
    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(r) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: January 30, 2015.
Dennis M. Keefe,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2015-02239 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Regulatory Decisionmaking: Some Frequently Asked Questions (NUREG-2201)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG–2201 (PDF – 2.09 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2016**Date Published:** September 2016

**Prepared by:** Nathan Siu Martin Stutzke Suzanne Dennis Donald Harrison

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an important decision-support tool at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The availability of experiential data for accidents, including those at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, raises natural questions regarding the need for and utility of PRA, which is, at heart, a systems modeling-based analytical approach. This report addresses these questions using the format of frequently asked questions (FAQs). The FAQs are organized into four topic categories: regulatory decisionmaking, PRA basics, core damage frequency state of knowledge, and large early release frequency state of knowledge. For each FAQ, the report provides both a brief answer and a supplementary discussion elaborating on that answer. The report also includes two appendices, which provide additional technical details on quantifying uncertainty and updating data based on experience.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
*** *

****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

*** *

*** *

****We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form   S-8 (No. 333-87255), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-110750) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-114945) of Zones, Inc. (formerly Multiple Zones International, Inc.) of our report dated February 28, 2005 relating to the financial statements,**financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,** which appears in this Form 10-K.**

*** *

*** *

*** *

****PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

****Seattle**,**Washington**

****February 28, 2005**
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Carolyn Frost Keenan 

Appellate case number: 01-15-00581-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-03190

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: 7/27/15

Party filing motion: Relator

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ ______Rebeca Huddle_________________________________________ 

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.

Date: August 27, 2015
#### State of Maine *vs.*Herbert Simmons and Frank Murphy.

Knox.

Opinion June 9, 1911.

*Indictment. Allegations. Obstructing Officers. Fish Warden. Revised Statutes, chapter 123, sections 21, 22.*

1. Section 21 of chapter 123', Revised Statutes against obstructing officers is limited to cases of obstructing officers iu the service of some process and does not support an indictment not containing an allegation that the officer was obstructed in the service of some process.

2. Section 22 of the same chapter is limited to the particular officers therein named and does not include fish wardens, and hence does not support an indictment for obstructing a fish warden.

3. An indictment at common law for obstructing a fish warden in the execution of his duty is invalid if it contain no description or specifications of the acts relied upon as constituting an obstructing, opposing or hindering him.

On exceptions by defendants.

Sustained.

The defendants were indicted for assaulting an officer, to wit, a fish warden, and obstructing him in the execution of his official duty. The indictment was nolle prossed as to the assault. The defendants then filed a demurrer which was overruled and the defendants excepted.

The case is stated in the opinion.

*Philip Howard,*County Attorney, for the State.

*Edward K. Gould,*for defendants.

Sitting: Emery, C. J., Savage, Spear, Cornish, Bird, JJ.

Emery, C. J.

Exceptions to overruling a demurrer to an indictment. The indictment originally was for assaulting a fish warden and obstructing him in the execution of his official duty. The county attorney, however, entered a nolle prosequi as to the assault, so that the indictment now charges only that the defendant "did then and there unlawfully and knowingly obstruct, oppose and *240hinder’’ the fish warden in the execution of his office, etc. It contains no description or specification of any acts of obstruction, opposing or hindering. The want of such description or specification is urged in support of the demurrer.

The indictment is not supported by any statute cited by the prosecution. Section 21 of chap. 123, R. S., is limited to the obstruction of an officer in the service of some process. There is in this indictment no allegation of such obstruction. Section 22 of the same chapter, is limited to the officers therein specified, and does not include fish wardens who are not named. The indictment therefore must be sustained by the common law if at all.

But the common law requires statements of facts, not of conclusions. In this case it requires a statement of the acts claimed to constitute the offense of obstructing, opposing or hindering an officer ; and for two reasons, viz: (1) that the court may see at the outset whether the acts do constitute the offense, and (2) that the defendant may know what he is to meet, and, if again prosecuted for the same offense, may avail himself of the conviction or acquittal in this case, in bar. *State*v. *Bushey,*96 Maine, 151; *State*v. *Downer,*8 Vt. 424; *State*v. *Maloney,*12 R. I. 251; *People*v. *Hamilton,*71 Mich. 340.

*Exceptions sustained.*

*Demurrer sustained.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Solely for the purposes ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer ofAML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

•                  the QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

•                  the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 12, 2003           |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/  Jacob Inbar                  |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                           |
|                                   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                               HINES HORTICULTURE

                            CERTIFCATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
P. Thigpen, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


                                                     By: /s/ Stephen P. Thigpen
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Stephen P. Thigpen
                                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Date: August 14, 2002
# L_2016071EN.01032201.xml

| 16.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 71/322 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 71/322

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 341 of 24 December 2015
  )

On page 89, Article 4, third paragraph:

for:

‘... in so far as it relates to Articles 124(1)(f) .... of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 .... Until that date, the powers referred to in Article 124(1)(f) ...’,

read:

‘... in so far as it relates to Articles 124(1)(h) .... of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 .... Until that date, the powers referred to in Article 124(1)(h) ...’.

---
# L_2015312EN.01002601.xml

| 27.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 312/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 312/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2009 of 10 November 2015 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Poland

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 294 of 11 November 2015
  )

On p. 70, third citation:

for:

‘Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament’,

read:

‘Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

...

Former footnote 2 is now footnote 3.

---

(2)  Opinion of 27 October 2015 (not yet published in the Official Journal).’.

2

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-133946 and No. 333-132181) and S-8 (No. 333-132170, No. 333-123171, No. 333-117619, No. 333-143303, and No. 333-147064) of NetLogic Microsystems,Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 13, 2008
HomeRadioactive WasteHigh-Level Waste DisposalHistorical InformationResolution of Key Technical Issues for High-Level Waste Disposal

# List and Status of Key Technical Issues for High-Level Waste Disposal

The staff has identified the following nine key technical issues (KTIs) associated with the proposed geologic respository for the disposal of high-level waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada:

**Explanation of Status:**

Issues are **closed-pending** if the NRC staff has confidence that the DOE proposed approach, together with the DOE agreement to provide the NRC with additional information (through specified testing, analysis, etc.), acceptably addresses the NRC's questions such that no information beyond that provided, or agreed to, will likely be required at time of initial license application. The term "closed pending" is merely a bookkeeping term. It means that DOE has agreed to provide information that, in the NRC staff's view, should close the issue, but, at the same time, this characterization does not imply that the staff has prejudged the outcome of the review of that information. Notwithstanding any such characterization, all issues will remain subject to further consideration during licensing if a license application for Yucca Mountain is received.

**NUREG-1762, "Integrated Issue Resolution Status Report,"** provides background information on the status of pre-licensing interactions between the NRC and DOE concerning the proposed high-level waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 08, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7124

LEE ODIS ALFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MACK JARVIS; PATRICIA L. CHAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-663-5-H)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Odis Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lee Odis Alford appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Alford v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction, No. CA-98-663-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsTechnical Letter Reports

# Technical Letter Reports – 2022

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024
# C_2004165EN.01000101.xml

| 24.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 June 2004

(2004/C 165/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2087 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4333 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1635 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3540 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58170 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,890 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6542 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4253 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5759 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 613 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5800 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,940 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 802 500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7609 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6424 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4265 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9304 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0772 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2087

JPY

Japanese yen

131,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4333

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66510

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1635

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5167

ISK

Iceland króna

87,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3540

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58170

CZK

Czech koruna

31,890

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6542

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4253

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5759

ROL

Romanian leu

40 613

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5800

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,940

TRL

Turkish lira

1 802 500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7609

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6424

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4265

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9304

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0772

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,91

ZAR

South African rand

7,6010

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
    UnitedGlobalCom, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-84234, 333-84236 and 333-84238) on Form S-8 of
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2003, except as to Notes 21 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of April 9,
2003 and November 12, 2003, respectively, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in this December 31, 2002,
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc.

Our
report dated March 31, 2003, except as to Notes 21 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of April 9, 2003 and November 12, 2003, respectively,
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company's primary operating subsidiary (United Pan-Europe Communications, N.V.) is currently under bankruptcy court supervision in
both the United States and in The Netherlands, has suffered recurring losses from operations and is currently in default under certain of its significant bank credit facilities and senior notes and
senior discount note agreements, which has resulted in a significant net working capital deficiency and raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

Our
report refers to a change in the Company's method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002.

Our
report refers to the revisions to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. However, we were not engaged to
audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. and subsidiaries other than with respect to such disclosures.

Our
report refers to a restatement of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|KPMG LLP |  |  |  | 
|-------- |  |  |  | 

Denver,
Colorado
November 12, 2003

---

QuickLinks