alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Strehlow, Respondent, vs. Planinger, imp., Appellant.

*March 7*

April *2, 1929.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of /. *Elmer Lehr*of Milwaukee, and for the respondent on that of /. *A. C. Lightner*of Milwaukee.

Owen, J.

The note sued upon was for $500 and was due November 30, 1924. Barbara Planinger defended on the ground that she had been discharged as surety by reason of an agreement entered into between Strehlow and *526Reingruber extending the time of payment for a period of sixty days. Upon the introduction of the note in evidence upon the trial in the civil court, an indorsement on the back thereof appeared as follows: “This note has been extended for a period of sixty days from the date of maturity. H. Reingruber.” Thereupon the defendant Planinger moved to amend her answer by alleging a material alteration of the note, which amendment was permitted.

The first question presented by the appeal is whether the agreement to extend the time of payment released the surety. It appears conclusively that there was no consideration for the agreement. Such an agreement is void and unenforceable. *Fanning v. Murphy,*126 Wis. 538, 550, 105 N. W. 1056. There being no effectual extension of the time of payment, the surety was not discharged, for that reason.

The next question is whether the surety is discharged because the indorsement on the back of the note extending the time of payment constituted a material alteration of the note. In order to constitute an alteration there must be some change, or erasure, or interlineation in the paper writing constituting the evidence of the contract so as to make it another and different instrument and no longer evidence of the contract which the parties made. *Cambridge Sav. Bank v. Hyde,*131 Mass. 77, at p. 78. In that case it was claimed a memorandum appearing on the back of the note reading, “rate of interest to be 6)4 % from October 10, 1876,” constituted a material alteration of the note rendering the same void. The court held that the memorandum did not constitute an alteration of the note. The original note remained intact. The identity of the note as indicating the contract between the parties was not destroyed. The court said: “The memorandum on the back is evidence of an independent collateral agreement and has no more effect than if it had been written on a separate paper.” It is held in the following cases that such a memorandum is a separate and independ*527ent contract and in no manner changes the contract between the parties as expressed on the face of the note: *Reed v. Culp,*63 Kan. 595, 66 Pac. 616; *Moore v. Macon Sav. Bank,*22 Mo. App. 684; *Huff v. Cole,*45 Ind. 300; *Bucklen v. Huff,*53 Ind. 474; *Littlefield v. Coombs,*71 Me. 110. There being neither a valid extension of the time of payment nor an alteration of the original contract between the parties, both defenses interposed by appellant fail, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— So ordered.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 41164 Summary Calendar

JESSE HERRERA ,
Petitioner

- Appellant

v. BRIAN SMITH; ANTONIO ANINAO , Respondent s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:18

- CV

- 21

Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesse Herrera, Texas prisoner # 684864 , is serving a 45

- year sentence for a 1994 murder conviction

. He appeal s the dismissal of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he challenged the result of his prior 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding . The district court construed the petition as a successive and
unauthorized § 2254 petitio n.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-41164 Document: 00515097965 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2019No. 18

- 41164

2 A threshold question is whether a state prisoner is required to obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) before appealing the dismissal of a habeas petition purportedly brought under § 2241. In this case, Herrera is required to obtain a COA becau se he is challenging a “final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court.” § 2253(c)(1)(A); see Stringer v. Williams , 161 F.3d 259, 262 (5th Cir. 1998 )

. However, w e have no jurisdiction to grant or deny a COA
where the district court did not deny or grant a COA. See Black v. Davis , 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, this appeal is HELD IN ABEYANCE and th e case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of allowin g the district court to consider
whether Herrera should be granted a COA from the d ismissal of his § 2241 petition

. Herrera’s motion to supplement the record is carried with the case. Case: 18-41164 Document: 00515097965 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2019
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Kinney, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: July 10, 2009 |  |                                     
|                     |  | /s/ John Kinney                     
|                     |  | John Kinney, Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0337. IN THE INTEREST OF T. J. AND K. J. CHILDREN (FATHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

13CV3168 13CV4130 14CV0338
EXHIBIT 10.1
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (the Amendment) IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation (Borrower), and WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a Wells Fargo Company ( , Bank).
 BACKGROUND
 Loan Agreement), inter alia,
   NOW, THEREFORE,
 Termination Date. Termination Date Section 1.1
 Applicable Margin. Section 1
 Applicable Margin




---



##### 



ApplicableMargin for Prime
    
    Applicable MarginFixed Charge Coverage Ratio
    
    Rate Loans
    
    for LIBOR LoansLess than 1.50 to 1
    
    
    0.75
    %
    
    
    3.00
    %Greater than or equal to
1.50 to 1 but less than or
equal to 2.50 to 1
    
    
    0.25
    %
    
    
    2.50
    %Greater than 2.50 to 1
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    2.25
    %
 Section
5.6(b) Section 5.6(d) Sections 5.6(b) or (d)
 Servicing Fee. Section 2.11.1
 Servicing Fee
 Financial Information. Section 5.6(a)
 Periodic Borrowing Base Information. Exhibit 5.6(a) Borrowing Base
Certificate
 2




---



##### 



Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. Section 5.6(e)
 Capital Expenditures. Section 7.2
 Capital Expenditures.
 Control Agreement.
 Commitment Fee. Commitment Fee
 Amendment/References.
 Release.
 3




---



##### 



Additional Documents; Further Assurances.
 Further Agreements and Representations .
    Schedule A
   4




---



##### 



Fees, Cost, Expenses and Expenditures.
 No Waiver.
 Inconsistencies.
 Binding Effect.
 Governing Law.
 Severability.
 Modifications.
 5




---



##### 



Headings.
 Counterparts.
 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Name/Title: SVP-Finance & Chief Financial OfficerWACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 
a WELLS
FARGO COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Margaret A. ByrneName/Title: Margaret A. Byrne/Director
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                   |                                 |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Date:                December 31, 2007 |                                                                   | /s/                R. William Wilson |
|                                   | R.                William WilsonChief                Financial Officer |

----
# Insects and Pollinators

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Animals 
-  Insects and Pollinators 

Three-fourths of the world’s flowering plants and about 35 percent of the world’s food crops depend on animal pollinators to reproduce.

## On This Page

            - Related News and Events

### Pollinators by Numbers

Three-fourths of the world’s flowering plants and about 35 percent of the world’s food crops depend on animal pollinators to reproduce. More than 3,500 species of native bees help increase crop yields. Some scientists estimate that one out of every three bites of food we eat exists because of animal pollinators like bees, butterflies and moths, birds and bats, and beetles and other insects.

### How Animal Pollination Works

Pollinators visit flowers in their search for food (nectar and pollen). During a flower visit, a pollinator may accidentally brush against the flower’s reproductive parts, unknowingly depositing pollen from a different flower. The plant then uses the pollen to produce a fruit or seed. Many plants cannot reproduce without pollen carried to them by foraging pollinators.

### Pollinators Are in Trouble

You may have heard that bees are disappearing and bats are dying. These and other animal pollinators face many challenges in the modern world. Habitat loss, disease, parasites, and environmental contaminants have all contributed to the decline of many species of pollinators.

##   Related Resources

### Monarch Butterflies

The Monarch Butterfly is one of the most familiar butterflies in North America. 

### Working Lands for Wildlife

Through Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW), USDA uses a win-win approach to systematically target conservation efforts to improve agricultural and forest productivity which enhance wildlife habitat on working landscapes. 

### Resources to Help Pollinators

NRCS and our conservation partners provide technical and financial assistance to create and improve pollinator habitat.

MichiganInsects and PollinatorsEnvironmental Quality Incentives Program

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.  

## Related News and Events

Press ReleaseNRCS Announces Second EQIP & RCPP Signup for 2024 FundingApril 16, 2024

Success StoryRestoring a Savannah Landscape in a Suburban Rural NeighborhoodMarch 13, 2024

NewsUSDA Launches New Bobwhite Conservation Pilot and Announces General Conservation Reserve Program Signup  March 02, 2024

- - State Technical CommitteeWisconsin State Technical Committee Meeting - April 2024April 18, 2024

          -  View More News 
          -  View More Events
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly
report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.


Date: May 14, 2004                       By:       /s/ Philip McDermott
                                                   -----------------------------
                                         Name:     Philip McDermott
                                         Title:    Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2019

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Prevention Insurance.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan P. Donenfeld, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








July 27, 2011
By:
/s/ ALAN P. DONENFELDAlan P. DonenfeldPresident and Director

Principal Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Regional Administrator Authorizes Restart of Crystal River Nuclear Power  Plant

----

----

No: II-98-05

January 30, 1998

**NRC REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZES RESTART OF CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Administrator Luis Reyes today granted permission for Florida Power Corporation to operate its Crystal River nuclear power plant.

The Crystal River plant, on the west coast of Florida, had been shut down since September 1996. After the plant was shut down, both the NRC and FPC discovered a number of design and engineering concerns, and the NRC staff issued a Confirmatory Action Letter in March 1997 outlining matters the plant staff would need to address and resolve prior to restart. The NRC formed a restart panel to review the issues and the company's corrective actions, and the Crystal River plant was placed on the NRC's list of plants requiring increased regulatory attention in 1997.

On Saturday, January 24, 1998, FPC notified the NRC that actions required in the CAL were complete and requested permission to return the plant to power operations.

In his letter authorizing restart, Reyes said the NRC has completed an assessment of the CAL items and considers each item closed. Reyes' letter gave concurrence to proceed to power operations in accordance with the plant license, and with the understanding that FPC will confer with the NRC before proceeding above the 50 percent and 90 percent power levels.

While FPC begins the process of bringing the plant back to full power, it will remain on the list requiring increased regulatory attention until the plant staff demonstrates a sustained period of improved performance.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2004137EN.01000101.xml

| 15.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 May 2004

(2004/C 137/01)

1 euro ==

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1802 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4408 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1640 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5400 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,69 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9465 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58620 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,947 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4530 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6522 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4256 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7672 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 494 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,8000 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,195 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 814 045 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7199 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6476 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2053 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9641 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0393 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1607 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1802

JPY

Japanese yen

135,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4408

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67390

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1640

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5400

ISK

Iceland króna

87,69

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9465

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58620

CZK

Czech koruna

31,947

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4530

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6522

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4256

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7672

ROL

Romanian leu

40 494

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,8000

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,195

TRL

Turkish lira

1 814 045

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7199

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6476

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2053

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9641

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0393

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,84

ZAR

South African rand

8,1607

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) (10/2020) Standard Document(77.86 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) Overview(512.41 KB)

Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) CPPE(26.41 KB)

Riparian Forest Buffer (Ac.) (391) Network Diagram(72.97 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Riparian Forest Buffer

This video explores how Forrest Pritchard implemented this conservation practice on his farm in Berryville, Virginia.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Early Successional Habitat Development/Mgt., Herbaceous Weed Control, Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Riparian Forest Buffer, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Woody Residue Treatment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.