alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James A. HAMMOND and Hazel Louise Gibson, Appellants, v. The UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA et al., Appellees.

No. 21512.

United States Court oí Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 1965.

Frank H. Heffron, Jack Greenberg, New York City, Francisco A. Rodriguez, Tampa, Fla., Constance Baker Motley, New York City, for appellants.

David C. G. Kerr, Charles F. Blake, Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for appellees, Chester H. Ferguson, Tampa, Fla., of counsel.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint brought by Negro plaintiffs seeking an injunction to prevent the University of Tampa from continuing its policy of restricting admissions to white persons. Although the University of Tampa is not a state or city institution in the usual sense, its establishment was largely made possible by the use of a surplus city building and the use of other city land leased for the University purposes. Under Derrington v. Plummer, 5 Cir., 240 F.2d 922, and Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, 5 Cir., 304 F.2d 320, the City’s involvement in the establishment and maintenance was of such a nature as to require a holding that “state” action under the Fourteenth Amendment was involved in the denial of appellants’ rights.

However, during the appeal the University’s governing body has withdrawn racial barriers, and we are informed that some Negro students have been enrolled. Thus, no injunctive order seems to be required to vindicate appellants’ constitutional rights.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court to retain jurisdiction for a reasonable time to permit it to determine that the appellees have commenced to, and will continue to, *952operate the University in such manner as will not discriminate against the appellants and the class for which they sued. Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH HOME FINANCIAL CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,553,719
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,977,523
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 54,230,175
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,022,461
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         9,812,064
<LOANS>                                    160,590,129
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,253,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             236,998,039
<DEPOSITS>                                 137,700,277
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,122,494
<LONG-TERM>                                 56,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,160,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             236,998,039
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,094,541
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,947,264
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               180,058
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,221,863
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,111,567
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,794,673
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,427,190
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,962,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,314,555
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   865,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.68
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,822,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,822,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,128,279
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   30,691
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,500
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,253,088
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
FILE COPY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711 !&>v (512)463-1312 

### September 30, 2013 Mr. Steven Rade Guy The Norman Law Firm 215 East Commerce St, 2nd Floor Jacksonville, TX 75766-1870 Mr. Gregory Lee West Cherokee County Jail 272 Underwood St. Rusk, TX 75785 RE: Case Number: 13-0760 

### Court ofAppeals Number: Trial Court Number: 2011 -02-0106 

### Style: IN RE GREGORY LEE WEST Ms. Kelley Denney Peacock Cherokee County District Attorney PO Box 839 Linden, TX 75563 

### RLE T OFAPPEALS 12th CourtofAppeals District 

### SEP 3 0 2013 Vt LER TEXAS 

### CATHY 3. LUSK, CLERK

Dear Counsel: 

### Today the Supreme Court ofTexas issued the enclosed abatement order in the abovereferenced case. Sincerely,

cc: Ms. Laverne Lusk Ms. Cathy S. Lusk Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk 

### by Claudia Jenks, ChiefDeputy ClerkFILE COPY


### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

No. 13-0760 

### In Re Gregory Lee West, Relator V.
, Real Party in Interest On Petition for Writ ofMandamus 

## RLED IN COURTOFAPPEALS •\2Xh C•y-'fi.ci Apneais District

TYLER TE CATHY S, '

ORDER 

### 1. The motion to abate appeal, filed on , is granted, and this case isABATED to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations. 2. This case is removed from the Court's active docket until, by which time the parties 

### must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss. The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings. Done at the City ofAustin, this 30 day ofSeptember, 20. 

## ft^, VW>j5:SKi^_^*- Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk Supreme Court ofTexas 

### By Claudia Jenks, ChiefDeputy Clerk
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

            In connection  with the annual report of New Century Equity Holdings
Corp.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2004,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John P.
Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

(1)         The Form 10-K report for the year ended  December  31,  2004,  filed
            with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005, fully
            complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Form 10-K report for the year ended
            December 31, 2004 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
            financial  condition and results of operations of New Century Equity
            Holdings Corp.

By:  /s/ JOHN P. MURRAY                         Date:  March 31, 2005
   ----------------------                              --------------
John P. Murray
Chief Financial Officer
```
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Integrated Pest Management, Nutrient Management

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# Our Performance

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Our Performance 

Our Performance
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, David M. McCarthy, Chief Executive Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form
10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-KSB"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 14, 2004


/s/  David M. McCarthy
     -----------------
Name:  David M. McCarthy
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 2, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Citizens National Corporation,*                     Wisner, Nebraska; to acquire up to an additional 0.16 percent, for a total of 35.36 percent, of the voting shares of Republic Corporation, and thereby acquire United Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 30, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02169 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Performance of Metal and Polymeric O-Ring Seals in Beyond-Design-Basis Temperature Excursions(NUREG/CR-7115, Revision 1)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2

First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of January 24, 2000 by and
between Meditrust Corporation and Michael F. Bushee

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as
of this 24 day of January, 2000 by and between Meditrust Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Employer") and Michael F. Bushee (the "Employee").

      WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee entered into an Employment
Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated as of January 1, 1999; and

      WHEREAS, the Employer has increased certain of the Employee's compensation
and benefits, effective as of January 1, 2000; and

      WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee wish to modify the Employment
Agreement to incorporate such changes.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideratIon of the foregoing, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:

      1. The first sentence of Section 3.1 is hereby deleted in its entirety and
is replaced with the following:

      "3.1  BASE SALARY. As payment for the services to be rendered by the
            Employee as provided in Section 1, and subject to the terms and
            conditions of Section 2, the Employer agrees to pay the Employee at
            the rate of $350,000 per annum, or such larger amount as may be
            established by the Employer from time-to-time (the "Base Salary")."

      2. Section 3.5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and is replaced with the following:

      "3.5  PERFORMANCE SHARES. The Employer has previously awarded the Employee
            90,000 performance shares in accordance with the terms described in
            Exhibit A hereto and the Employer's 1995 Share Award Plan and in the
            future may award additional shares from time-to-time (the
            "Performance Shares")."

      Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect and unaffected hereby.
<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment
to Employment Agreement under seal as of the day and year first above written.

                                    MEDITRUST CORPORATION


                                 By /s/ David F. Benson
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Name.
                                    Title:


                                 /s/ Michael F. Bushee
                                 --------------------------------
                                 Michael F. Bushee


                                       2
# C_2004161EN.01000801.xml

| 18.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/8

---

CANCELLATION OF A RESTRICTED CALL FOR PROPOSALS

CANCELLATION OF A RESTRICTED CALL FOR PROPOSALS

in the fields of Justice and Home Affairs

(2004/C 161/04)

1.   Publication reference: EuropeAid/116807/C/G/Multi

2.   Date of publication: 12/07/2003 (in OJ C 163)

3.   Programme: CARDS Regional Programme 2002 and 2003

4.   Contracting authority: The European Commission, on behalf of the beneficiary countries

5.   Other information: This cancellation only concerns project C ‘Development of a reliable and functioning prison system respecting fundamental rights and standards and enhancing of regional co-operation’.

This project, with revised specifications, will be subject to a new Call for Proposals in the near future.

Notes:

Should a new tender procedure be launched for this project, a new notice will be published.

Natural or legal persons interested should not therefore send proposals or requests for information at this stage.

---
Order entered January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01413-CR

ERIK JAMAL JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-63319-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On November 14, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On January 22, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the November 14, 2013 order 

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd Waltz, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 28, 2010/s/ Todd WaltzTodd WaltzChief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement
of Operations included within this Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         26,222
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,366
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,255
<PP&E>                                         85,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 50,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          68,671
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,303
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,624
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               64,849
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,537
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.20
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Vision  Global  Solutions,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Jean-Paul Ouellette,  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2006

                                   /s/ Jean-Paul Ouellette
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7255

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KARL E. MOORE, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:02-cr-00217-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karl E. Moore, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, 

Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Karl E. Moore, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Moore, 2:02-cr-00217-RAJ-JEB-1 

(E.D. Va. July 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED