alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis D. Oklak,Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.
|        |   |  /s/     Dennis D. Oklak |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Dennis D. Oklak                              |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer         |
|   |   | of the General  Partner                      |
|   |   | Date: May 11, 2007                           |

 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retainedby Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffSafety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Reposito

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Repository Safety after Permanent Closure (NUREG-1949, Volume 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1949, Volume 3 (PDF – 3.85 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2014**Date Published:** October 2014

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Volume 3, Repository Safety After Permanent Closure, of this Safety Evaluation Report (SER) documents the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's review and evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Safety Analysis Report (SAR), Chapter 2: Repository Safety After Permanent Closure, provided in DOE's June 3, 2008, license application, as updated by DOE on February 19, 2009. In its application, DOE seeks authorization from the Commission to construct a repository at Yucca Mountain. The NRC staff also reviewed information DOE provided in response to the NRC staff's requests for additional information and other information that DOE provided related to the SAR. In particular, SER Volume 3 documents the results of the NRC staff's evaluation to determine whether the proposed repository design complies with the performance objectives and requirements that apply after the repository is permanently closed. The NRC staff finds, with reasonable expectation, that DOE has demonstrated compliance with the NRC regulatory requirements for postclosure safety, including, but not limited to, "Performance objectives for the geologic repository after permanent closure" in 10 CFR 63.113, "Requirements for performance assessment" in 10 CFR 63.114, "Requirements for multiple barriers" in 10 CFR 63.115, and "Postclosure Public Health and Environmental Standards" in 10 CFR Part 63, Subpart L. In particular, the NRC staff finds that the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain (1) is comprised of multiple barriers and (2) based on performance assessment evaluations that are in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, meets the 10 CFR Part 63, Subpart L limits for individual protection, human intrusion, and separate standards for protection of groundwater.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

NO. 89-3654

_________________________

RONALD CHISOM, MARIE BOOKMAN, WALTER WILLARD, MARC MORIAL,

HENRY DILLON, III, and the LOUISIANA VOTER

REGISTRATION/EDUCATION CRUSADE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-IntervenorAppellant

versus

EDWIN W. EDWARDS, Governor of the State of Louisiana,

W. FOX McKEITHEN, Louisiana Secretary of State, and

JERRY M. FOWLER, Commissioner of Elections of the

State of Louisiana,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

_________________________________________________________________

(October 6, 1992)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KING, JOHNSON and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The consent judgment referred to in our order filed on

August 21, 1992, having been entered by the district court, these

appeals are DISMISSED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANGELA A. BENTRIM , Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY S. BENTRIM , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3601

[ November 25, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward A. Garrison , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2007

- DR

008773

- XXXX

- MB

.
Margherita Downey of the Law Office of Margherita Downey LLC, Delray Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , C IKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., con cur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

April 9-10, 2015.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Mecham Conference Center, One Columbus Circle NE., Washington, DC 20544.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: January 23, 2015.

Jonathan C. Rose,

Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01562 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Field Border, Integrated Pest Management, Land Clearing, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
----

----

FORM 10-Q 

|            (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 3, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Noland Granberry               |
|-------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|              |   |   | Noland Granberry                   |
|              |   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|              |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----

----
<PAGE>

                                                 EXHIBIT 11.1

                        ZORAN CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
              (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                          (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                 -------------------           -------------------
                                                    1997      1996               1997       1996
                                                 -------------------           -------------------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>                 <C>       <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding         9,504      8,827               9,303     8,754
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
  based on the treasury stock method               1,627      2,024               1,776     1,788
                                                 ------------------             -----------------

Weighted average common shares and
  equivalents                                     11,131     10,851              11,079    10,542
                                                 ------------------             -----------------
                                                 ------------------             -----------------

Net income                                       $   863    $ 1,132             $ 2,556   $ 2,806 
                                                 ------------------             -----------------
                                                 ------------------             -----------------

Net income per share                             $  0.08    $  0.10             $  0.23   $  0.27 
                                                 ------------------             -----------------
                                                 ------------------             -----------------
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAKHMATULLA ASATOV,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3039

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH3330120309-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

The Department of the Army moves to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. Rakhmatulla 

Asatov responds to the court’s order directing him to show 

cause as to why his appeal should not be dismissed as 

untimely. 

Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2013
2 RAKHMATULLA ASATOV v. ARMY

On August 2, 2012, the Merit Systems Protection 

Board (“Board”) issued an initial decision denying Mr. 

Asatov’s request for corrective action. On September 6, 

2012, the initial decision became the final decision of the 

Board. The court received Mr. Asatov’s petition for review 

on November 6, 2012, or 61 days after the Board’s decision became final.

Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 

5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that 

“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the 

Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the 

Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (2012). This filing period 

is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. 

Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984); see 

also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement that cannot be waived).

Mr. Asatov argues that he “filed” his petition for review with the United States Postal Service. In order for a 

petition for review to filed, however, it must be received 

by this court. Mr. Asatov also argues that equitable 

tolling should be applied in this case. As explained above, 

the 60-day filing deadline is statutory, mandatory and 

jurisdictional and cannot be waived or equitably tolled. 

Because Mr. Asatov’s petition was not received within 60 

days of the date he received the Board's decision, we must 

dismiss his petition as untimely.

Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2013
 RAKHMATULLA ASATOV v. ARMY 3

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion to dismiss is granted.

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk

s25

Issued As A Mandate: June 19, 2013

Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 3 Filed: 06/19/2013
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NEBO Products, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we Scott Holmes, Chief Executive
Officer, and Paul Larsen, Controller, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                           /s/ Scott Holmes
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Scott Holmes
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ Paul Larsen
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Paul Larsen
                                         Controller
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Basic Energy Sciences 
Advisory Committee (BESAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: 
Thursday, February 26, 2015 8:00 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.
Friday, February 27, 2015 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: Bethesda North Hotel and Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli 
Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Perine, Office of Basic Energy 
Sciences; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-22/Germantown Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: (301) 
903-6529.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of this Board is to make 
recommendation to DOE-SC with respect to the basic energy sciences 
research program.
    Tentative Agenda:

<bullet> Annual Ethics Briefing (BESAC Members Only)
<bullet> Call to Order, Introductions, Review of the Agenda
<bullet> News from the Office of Science (Budget)
<bullet> News from the Office of Basic Energy Sciences (Budget)
<bullet> Report by the BESAC Subcommittee on Transformational 
Opportunities
<bullet> NSLS-II Update
<bullet> BES Nanocenters Update
<bullet> Committee of Visitors for the Materials Sciences and 
Engineering Division
<bullet> Public Comments
<bullet> Adjourn
Breaks Taken As Appropriate

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact 
Katie Perine at (301) 903-6594 (fax) or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d9d3c6dbd79cc2d7c0dbdcd7f2c1d1dbd7dcd1d79cd6ddd79cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="751e14011c105b0510071c1b103506161c101b16105b111a105b121a03">[email protected]</span></a> 
(email). Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled 
oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will 
conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 30 days by contacing Ms. Perine at the 
address listed above.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 27, 2015.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01906 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46091-46092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9710-5]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 
As Amended; Anaconda Copper Mine Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice, request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action by Bona 
Fide Administrative Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs 
(``Agreement,'' Region 9 Docket No. 9-2012-07) pursuant to Section 
122(h) of CERCLA concerning the ANACONDA COPPER MINE SITE (the 
``Site''), located in Yerington, Lyon County, Nevada. The respondent is 
Singatse Peak Services (``Respondent''). Through the proposed 
Agreement, the Respondent will fund up to $420,000 toward a response 
action by EPA to address releases from the Arimetco heap leach fluid 
management system (``FMS''). Respondent will conduct a study to assess 
options to ensure approximately five years of fluid capacity in the 
FMS, and may pay toward any response to implement a selected option. 
The Agreement provides Respondent with a covenant not to sue for past 
costs at the Site and response actions funded in the Agreement, as well 
as contribution protection. For thirty (30) days following the date of 
publication of this Notice, the Agency will receive written comments 
relating to the proposed Agreement, and EPA's responses to comments 
received will be available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX 
offices, located at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 
94105.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The proposed Agreement may be obtained from Bryan Goodwin, 
in the Office of Regional Counsel, telephone (415) 972-3686. Comments 
regarding the proposed Agreement should be addressed to Mr. Goodwin at 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (ORC-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, 
San Francisco, California 94105, and should reference the Singatse Peak 
Services Agreement for the Anaconda Copper Mine Site, and Region IX 
Docket No. 9-2012-07.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Helmlinger, Office of Regional 
Counsel, (415) 972-3904, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

[[Page 46092]]

    Dated: July 23, 2012.
Jane Diamond,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-18870 Filed 8-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```