alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# ATHEANA User's Guide (NUREG-1880)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1880 (PDF - 6.81 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2007**Date Published:** June 2007

**Prepared by:**John Forester, Sandia National Laboratories Alan Kolaczkowski, Science Applications International Corporation Susan Cooper, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dennis Bley, Buttonwood Consulting, Inc. Erasmia Lois, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87185

Science Applications International Corporation 405 Urban Street, Suite 400 Lakewood, Co 80220

 Erasmia Lois, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This manuscript provides a user's guide for the human reliability analysis (HRA) method known as "A Technique for Human Event Analysis" (ATHEANA), which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) documented in NUREG-1624, Rev. 1, dated May 2000. As the first publication of its kind, this user's guide describes both the quantitative and qualitative ATHEANA analysis approaches, fully describing the revised quantification approach and presenting a simpler description of the other ATHEANA elements needed to perform an HRA as part of a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Toward that end, this user's guide strives to present the steps for applying ATHEANA in a straightforward and succinct manner, so that HRA experts can easily and effectively apply the technique. Consequently, although the authors relied on NUREG-1624 as a primary resource for its development, the NRC is publishing this user's guide as a standalone document, such that it can be used by analysts to apply the ATHEANA technique without the need to use NUREG-1624.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

[WHITNEY LOGO]

                                    Allonge

ALLONGE TO NOTE BY CONRAD SHIPYARD, L.L.C., PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF WHITNEY
NATIONAL BANK, DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999, IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
$10,000,000.00.

        This allonge amends the above-identified Note (the "Note") as follows:

        PAYMENT SCHEDULE: The principal amount set forth above, or the principal
amount then outstanding of advances that Bank makes hereunder to Borrower,
whichever amount is less, shall be payable on June 30, 2001, and interest shall
be payable monthly. Any monthly interest payments shall commence on May 30,
2001, and interest shall be payable monthly on the same day thereafter.

        EXTEND MATURITY: Effective April 30, 2001, the maturity date on the Note
is extended to June 30, 2001.

        Any collateral securing the Note shall continue to secure the Note as
hereby amended.

        In connection with the foregoing and only in connection with the
foregoing, the Note is hereby amended, but in all other respects all of the
terms and conditions of the Note remain unaffected and the Note, as hereby
amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

        Executed this 25th day of April, 2001.

                                CONRAD SHIPYARD, L.L.C.

                                By: /s/ William H. Hidalgo
                                   -------------------------------
                                        William H. Hidalgo
                                Its:    Manager

                                WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK

                                By: /s/ Edgar W. Santa Cruz, III
                                   -------------------------------
                                        Edgar W. Santa Cruz, III
                                Its:    Vice President
deP 

west virginia department of environmental protection 

Executive Office 

60 I 57°' Street SE 

Charleston, WV 25304 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region III (3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

June 3, 2015 

Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor 

Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary 

dep.wv.gov 

Re: Revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan Pursuant to Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration - Request for Approval 

Dear Administrator Garvin: 

On behalf of the State of West Virginia, I am herein submitting the 2015 Legislative Rule 

45CSR14- Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources for 

the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality, effective June 1, 2015, as a revision to 

the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Included in this submittal is appropriate documentation 

which validates that proper state and federal administrative procedural rulemaking requirements 

have been fulfilled. Also included with this submittal is an electronic copy on compact disk in 

searchable PDF format. We certify that the enclosed electronic copy contains an exact duplicate 

of information contained in the hardcopy submission. 

In a letter dated January 20,2015, WVDEP committed to provide EPA with a SIP 

revision incorporating a significant monitoring concentration (SMC) value of zero for PM2.s into 

West Virginia's PSD rule. EPA relied upon on this letter of commitment, and consequently 

proposed conditional approval of the 2012 and 2014 SIP revisions of 45CSR14 [80 FR 16612]. 

Upon approval of2015 Legislative Rule 45CSR14 into the SIP, the SMC value contained in the 

rule will satisfy this commitment, and EPA may subsequently issue a final rule in which West 

Virginia's conditional approval of the 2012 and 2014 SIP revisions of 45CSR14 will become 

final approvals. 

West Virginia requests that you approve this most recent version of 45CSR14 as a 

revision to the SIP, replacing the current version of 45CSR14 approved by EPA on May 27, 

2011 at 76 FR 30832 and issuing fmal approval of the conditional approvals noted above. 

Promoting a healthy environment. 
Letter to Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

June 3, 2015 

Page2 

If you have any questions regarding this submittal or require additional information, 

please contact William F. Durham, Director of the Division of Air Quality at (304) 926-0462. 

RCH/jlm 

Enclosure 

cc: Diana Esher (3APOO) 

William F. Durham, Director, WVDAQ 

Sincerely, 

Randy C. Huffman 

Cabinet Secretary
# L_2017209DE.01005901.xml

| 12.8.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 209/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 209/59

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1322/2014 der Kommission vom 19. September 2014 zur Ergänzung und Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 167/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Anforderungen an die Bauweise von Fahrzeugen und der allgemeinen Anforderungen im Zusammenhang mit der Typgenehmigung von land- und forstwirtschaftlichen Fahrzeugen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 364 vom 18. Dezember 2014
  )

Seite 311, Anhang XXVI Nummer 1.1:

Anstatt:

„Die für die in Anhang XVIII aufgeführten Betätigungseinrichtungen verwendeten Symbole sowie andere Anzeigen müssen den Anforderungen von ISO 3767 Teil 1 (1998+A2:2012) und, soweit anwendbar, Teil 2 (:2008) entsprechen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die für die in Anhang XXIII aufgeführten Betätigungseinrichtungen verwendeten Symbole sowie andere Anzeigen müssen den Anforderungen von ISO 3767 Teil 1 (1998+A2:2012) und, soweit anwendbar, Teil 2 (:2008) entsprechen.“

---
# Soil Health Literature

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Soil Health 
-  Soil Health Literature 

Literature compiled from peer-reviewed papers relating to the impact of conservation practices on soil properties important for soil health.

These files are compiled from peer-reviewed papers relating to the impact of conservation practices on soil physical and chemical properties important for soil health, as summarized by our soil health specialists. Please note that the peer-reviewed papers and conservation practices included are not exhaustive and will be added to periodically. While the literature review currently primarily focuses on soil physical and chemical properties and cropland, soil biological properties and economics and other land uses will be included in future revisions.

### Summaries of Soil Health Literature

Soil Health Literature Summary Effects of Conservation Practices Jan. 2015(886.73 KB)

Effects of Implementation of Soil Health Management Practices on Infiltration, Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, and Runoff(660.77 KB)

Effects on Soil Water Holding Capacity and Soil Water Retention Resulting from Soil Health Management Practices Implementation(708.94 KB)

### Practice Effects, Programs, etc.

Crop Residue Removal for Biomass Energy Production(284.16 KB)

Soil Quality Considerations in the Conversion of CRP Land to Crop Production(22.31 KB)

Protecting Urban Soil Quality(527.88 KB)

State and Transition Models and Dynamic Soil Properties Databases(144.64 KB)

### Filterable Soil Health Literature Listings

Soil Health Literature Matrix Data Dictionary(235.49 KB)

Soil Health Literature - Matrix of Soil Properties(416.4 KB)

Soil Health Literature - Summaries and Citations(319.88 KB)

Soils and Science and Technology for Soil Health SharePoint - USDA employees and others with USDA Active Directory accounts have full access to reprints of peer-reviewed papers and the interactive database matrix, summaries, and citations.

"The Science Behind Healthy Soil: NRCS' Soil Health Literature Review Project" - Webinar, presented January 13, 2015, and designed primarily for USDA employees, covers how to use the Science, Soils & Technology for Soil Health SharePoint site, and is available on-demand. (requires no-cost registration at the Science and Technology Training Library).

"The Science Behind Healthy Soil: NRCS' Soil Health Literature Review Project" Webinar Slides(9.02 MB)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                           |  |  |  | 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA     |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   |  |  |  |
#### Hagmann, Appellant, vs. Franklin State Bank and State Banking Commission, Respondents.

*December 6, 1933*—

January *9, 1934.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Wheeler & Witte*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Lyman G. Wheeler.*

*George A. Affeldt*of Milwaukee, for the respondents.

Rosenberry, C. J.

This case is here upon appeal upon substantially -the same record as *Coyle v. Franklin State Bank et al.,*decided herewith (ante, p. 601, 252 N. W. 361), and is governed by the same considerations. The mandate in this case therefore will be the same as in that case for the reasons there stated.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EPA FORM 6100

- 2 (DBE Subcontractor Participation Form) OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

DBE Subcontractor Participation Form

An EPA F inancial Assistance Agreement Recipient must require its prime contractors to provide this form to its

DBE subcontractors. This form gives a DBE 1 subcontractor 2 the opportunity to describe work received and/ or

report any concerns regarding the EPA

- funded project (e.g. , in areas such as termination by prime contractor , late

payments, etc

. ). The DBE subcontractor can, as an option, complete and submit this form to the EPA DBE

Coordinator at any time during the project period of performance

.

Subcontractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposa l No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address

Telephone No. Email Address

Prime Contractor Name Issuing/Funding Entity:

Contract

Item

Number Description of Work Received from the Prime Contractor Involving

Construction, Services , Equipment or Supplies Amount Received

by Prime

Contractor

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as

described in 40 CFR 33.204

- 33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as

described in 40 CFR 33.202.

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company , firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agreement with a contractor to provide

services pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance.EPA FORM 6100

- 2 (DBE Subcontractor Participation Form) OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

DBE Subcontractor Participa tion Form

Please use the space below to report any concerns regarding the above EPA

- funded project:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______

______________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______

______________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average three (3) hours

per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden

estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated

collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Inclu de the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send

the completed form to this address.

Subcontractor Signature Title/ date
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffReport to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences (NUREG-0090)

# Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences - Fiscal Year 2010 (NUREG-0090, Volume 33)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0090, Volume 33 (PDF - 2.53 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2011**Date Published:** June 2011

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-438) defines an "abnormal occurrence" (AO) as an unscheduled incident or event that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) determines to be significant from the standpoint of public health or safety. The Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-66) requires that NRC report AOs to Congress annually.

This report describes eight events that NRC identified as AOs during Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 based on the criteria defined in Appendix A to this report. One event involved radiation exposure to an embryo/fetus. The other seven events occurred at NRC-licensed or regulated medical institutions and are medical events as defined in Title 10, Part 35, of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR Part 35).

In addition, this report describes seven events that Agreement States identified as AOs during FY 2010 based on the criteria in Appendix A to this report. Agreement States are those States that have entered into formal agreements with NRC, pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), to regulate certain quantities of byproduct, source, and special nuclear material at facilities located within their borders. Currently, there are 37 Agreement States. Two Agreement State-licensed events involved radiation exposure to an embryo/fetus. The other five Agreement State-licensed events were medical events as defined in 10 CFR Part 35.

Appendix A to this report presents NRC's criteria for selecting AOs as well as the guidelines for selecting "Other Events-of Interest." Appendix B, "Updates of Previously Reported Abnormal Occurrences," provides updated information for two events reported in the FY 2009 "Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences." These were medical events at the Gamma Knife Center of the Pacific in Honolulu, Hawaii, and the Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System in San Diego, California. During FY 2010, four items were identified as meeting the guidelines for inclusion in Appendix C, "Other Events of Interest." Three of these events occurred at nuclear power plants and the other event occurred at a nuclear fuel cycle facility. Appendix D, "Glossary," contains a glossary of terms used throughout this report. Appendix E, "Conversion Table," presents commonly used conversions when calculating doses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/  Clive Kabatznik
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name: Clive Kabatznik
                                        Chief ExecutiveOfficer
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date: November 12, 2002


                                       19
# L_2015102EN.01009602.xml

| 21.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/96

---

Corrigendum to Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2015/339 of the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2015

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 69 of 13 March 2015
  )

In Section III ‘Commission’, the following budget lines:

02 05 11, 04 03 11, 06 02 04, 07 02 05 01, 07 02 05 02, 07 02 06, 09 02 03, 09 02 04, 15 02 12, 18 02 04, 18 02 05, 18 02 06, 32 02 10, 33 02 06, 33 02 07 and 33 03 04

must be read as differentiated appropriations.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     763,406
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              289,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                50,000
<INVENTORY>                                612,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,615,308
<PP&E>                                   3,673,028
<DEPRECIATION>                          (2,656,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,759,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      997,332
<BONDS>                                     10,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                19,573,937
<OTHER-SE>                             (17,821,539)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,759,904
<SALES>                                    500,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,761,116
<CGS>                                      162,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              936,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           884,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          32,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (92,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (92,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (92,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)



</TABLE>