alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' MARCH 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,377)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,922
<PP&E>                                       1,344,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,418,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,410
<BONDS>                                        506,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     846,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,418,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,388
<CGS>                                           28,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Meress, Administratrix, Appellant, vs. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Max Raskin,*attorney, and *Wm. F. Quick*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Bender, Trump & McIntyre*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Leigh Caswell*of Crystall Falls, Michigan, of counsel.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)

# NRC Regulatory Guides - Transportation (Division 7)

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 7, "Transportation," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

## Transportation (Division 7)

        - Guides 7.1 – 7.13

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Division 1 - Power Reactors
          - Division 2 Research and Test Reactors
          - Division 3 - Fuels and Materials Facilities
          - Division 4 - Environmental and Siting
          - Division 5 - Materials and Plant Protection
          - Division 6 - Products
          - Division 7 - Transportation
          - Division 8 - Occupational Health
          - Division 9 - Antitrust and Financial Review
          - Division 10 - General

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2021-1





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of October 27, 2021 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 24 th day of March, 2023.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President, Financial Services
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Learning Care Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 22, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, William D. Davis, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of       operations of the Company.   /s/ William D. DavisWilliam D.
Davis, President andChief Executive OfficerSeptember 1, 2005
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 – Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, 50-456, and 50-457 – Exelon Generation Company, LLC (NUREG-2190, Volumes 1 & 2)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject – FY 2016

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Darell E. Zink, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | s/    Darell E. Zink, Jr.                                 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darell E. Zink, Jr.                                                           |
|   | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of the  General Partner |
|   | August 12, 2003                                                          |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Darell E. Zink, Jr., Vice Chairman, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and will be retained Mr.Zink and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

----
N OTE : This order is nonprec e dential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

RAKHMATULLA ASATOV, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

______________________

2013

- 3039

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in N o. PH3330120309 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before N EWMAN

, R EYNA , and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

The Department of the Army moves to dismiss the p etition for review for lack of jurisdiction. Rakhmatulla Asatov responds to the court’s order directing him to show cause as to why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2013RAKHMATULLA ASATOV v. ARMY 2

On August 2, 2012, the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) issued an initial decision denying Mr. Asatov’s request for corrective action. On September 6, 2012, the initial decision became the final decision of the
Board. The court received Mr. Asatov’ s petition for review on November 6, 2012, or 61 days after the Board’s dec ision became final.

Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1) , which provides in relevant part that “[n] otwithstanding any other provision of law, any pet ition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the
Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the

Board. ” 5 U.S .C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (2012). This filing period is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp

., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984) ; see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived ).

Mr. Asatov argues that he “filed” his petition for r eview with the United States Postal Service. In order for a petition for review to filed, however, it must be received by this court. Mr. Asatov also argues that equitable tolling sho uld be applied in this case. As explained above,

the 60

- day filing deadline is statutory, mandatory and jurisdictional and cannot be waived or equitably tolled.

Because Mr. Asatov ’s petition was not received within 60 days of the date he received the Boa rd's decision, we must
dismiss his petition as untimely. Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2013RAKHMATULLA ASATOV v. ARMY 3

Accordingly

,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The motion to dismiss is granted.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk

s25

Issued As A M andate: June 19, 2013 Case: 13-3039 Document: 11 Page: 3 Filed: 06/19/2013
No. 90-6327.

#### Jacecko *v.*West Chester State University et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2015065EN.01000401.xml

| 10.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/385

of 3 March 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Oli de l'Empordà/Aceite de L'Empordà (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Oli de l'Empordà’/‘Aceite de L'Empordà’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Oli de l'Empordà’/‘Aceite de L'Empordà’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oli de l'Empordà’/‘Aceite de L'Empordà’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oli de l'Empordà’/‘Aceite de L'Empordà’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Oli de l'Empordà’/‘Aceite de l'Empordà’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 358, 10.10.2014, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsPetition  for Rulemaking Dockets

# Petition for Rulemaking Dockets for 2020

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 30, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Open Petition for Rulemaking Dockets
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 30, 2022
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

131003 & (16) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC 131003 

v CoA 267603

 Monroe CC 96-027270-FY 

CHRISTOPHER GENE BROOKS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for voluntary 

dismissal of his application for leave to appeal is considered and the application for leave 

to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 28, 2006 

 Clerk
Third Amendment to The Progressive Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”),
is currently in effect; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that it is desirable to further amend the Plan;

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 8(d) of the Plan, entitled “Buyout Provisions,” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 


 

	 	2.	Section 9(b)(vi) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


(vi) Unless varied by the Committee, Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified for
Stock Options in Sections 8(b)(vi) and (vii). 
  

	 	3.	Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged.
Exhibit
32.1






Chief
Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002






In
connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Longe, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.




/s/Thomas J.
      LongeDate:
      March 16, 2009
            Thomas
      J. Longe
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by
TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.











Exhibit
32.1




Chief
Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002






In
connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Longe, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.




/s/Thomas
      J. LongeDate:
      April 16, 2009
            Thomas
      J. Longe
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by
TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS(in thousands except ratios)**
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Six Months**                    | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Ended June 30, 2007** | ** ** |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions |       | $                                      | 38,852     |   |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | 77,037                                 |       |
| Earnings before debt  service                                        |       | $                                      | 115,889    |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                   |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | $                                      | 77,037     |   |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    |       | 5,018                                  |       |
| Total debt service                                                   |       | $                                      | 82,055     |   |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                             |       |
| **Ratio of earnings to debt service**                                | ** ** | **1.41**                               |       |

 

----