alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
3.0





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Starmed Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew Jennings, CEO of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  September 4,
      2008
                By: /s/ Matthew
      Jennings
                  Matthew
      Jennings, CEO, President,
                      Acting
      Chief Financial Officer,
                      Principal
      Executive Officer and
                      Principal
      Financial and
                      Accounting
      Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# C_2004176EN.01000101.xml

| 8.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 July 2004

(2004/C 176/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2357 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4351 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6676 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1813 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5185 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5818 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,528 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6625 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4264 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5217 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 860 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,779 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 784 200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7127 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6318 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6383 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8866 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1099 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 423,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6301 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2357

JPY

Japanese yen

133,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4351

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6676

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1813

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5185

ISK

Iceland króna

88,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5818

CZK

Czech koruna

31,528

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6625

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4264

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5217

ROL

Romanian leu

40 860

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,779

TRL

Turkish lira

1 784 200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7127

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6318

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6383

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8866

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1099

KRW

South Korean won

1 423,59

ZAR

South African rand

7,6301

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2004118EN.01003803.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/38

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 22 April 2004

in Case T-343/02: Roland Schintgen v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Staff Committee of the Commission in Luxembourg - Elections to the Luxembourg Staff Committee - Electoral system - Principles of fairness and democracy)

(2004/C 118/82)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-343/02: Roland Schintgen, a Commission official residing in Keispelt (Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and V. Joris) – application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority, dated 16 July 2002 and notified to the applicant on 6 August 2002, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 28 February 2002, by which, in essence, he applied for annulment of the elections to the local staff committee of the Commission in Luxembourg which took place in November 2001 and of the appointment of those elected to that committee and the Commission's failure to annul those elections – the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, and M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; D. Christensen (Administrator), Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

1

---
**Exhibit
      12.2**




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Hemdat Sawh, certify that:




1.
      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Goldbelt Resources
      Ltd.;




2.
      Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;




3.
      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
      December 22, 2006




/s/
      Hemdat
      Sawh


Hemdat
      Sawh


Chief
      Financial
      Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2073 

To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 

immigration officers or agents of the Department of Homeland Security 

from wearing clothing or other items bearing the word ‘‘police’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

GALLEGO, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. LEE, Mr. 

VEASEY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CORREA, Ms. MOORE, Mrs. TORRES, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

of New York, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to prohibit immigration officers or agents of the 

Department of Homeland Security from wearing clothing 

or other items bearing the word ‘‘police’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2073 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON IMMIGRATION OFFICER UNI2 FORMS. 

3 Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

4 (8 U.S.C. 1357) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(i) Immigration officers or agents of the Depart7 ment of Homeland Security, including officers and agents 

8 of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. 

9 Customs and Border Protection, shall not wear any cloth10 ing, accessories, or other items on their person bearing 

11 the word ‘police’ while performing duties under the immi12 gration laws.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Fritsch, Respondent, vs. Fritsch, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Julius 0. Roehl*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Mount & Zander,*attorneys, and *Lorens & Neubauer*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
HomeRadioactive WasteHigh-Level Waste DisposalHistorical Information

# Quality Assurance Program

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

The NRC observes and comments on the Department of Energy (DOE) quality assurance (QA) program. As a result of NRC's comments on deficiencies in DOE's QA program, the DOE submitted to NRC on January 3, 2002, the "OCRWM Management Improvement Initiatives" (OMII). The NRC reviewed the OMII and informed DOE that the report did not meet NRC's expectations. On April 5, 2002, the DOE submitted a letter to NRC describing actions DOE will take to develop a revised report. On July 19, 2002, the DOE submitted to NRC a revision to the OMII: "Management Improvement Initiatives, Revision 0." On May 29, 2003, DOE submitted a letter to NRC providing details of the actions being taken to ensure that a potential license application meets NRC expectations for completeness, accuracy, and compliance with quality assurance requirements.

On April 5, 2004, DOE submitted a letter to NRC that indicated that DOE has completed the commitments made in the Management Improvement Initiatives. Enclosed with the letter is a memorandum transmitting the reports "Management Improvement Initiative (MII) Independent Review (IR)" dated March 19, 2004, "Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) Annunciator Panel from March Monthly Operating Review," and "OCRWM Management Improvement Initiatives Transition Approach, Rev. 1," dated December 2003.

The NRC staff also observes audits conducted by the Department of Energy's Office of Quality Assurance. The DOE audits assess whether their contractors have satisfactorily implemented the DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management quality assurance program.

The NRC documents its observations of the DOE audit and transmits its observations to the DOE. NRC observation audit reports are available and are listed below.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 08, 2020
----

Exhibit 13.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Hemdat Sawh, Chief Financial Officer of Goldbelt ResourcesLtd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enactedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge: 

> 
(i) the Company's annual report on  Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: January 19, 2006 

| /s/ Hemdat Sawh         |
|-------------------------|
| Hemdat Sawh             |
| Chief Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,890,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                   244,435
<INVENTORY>                                    955,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,196,533
<PP&E>                                         636,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 351,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,499,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,492,711
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,260
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,314,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,499,125
<SALES>                                      1,423,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,485,607
<CGS>                                          930,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  930,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,437,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               171,796
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,882,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,889,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,889,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.36)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**MICHAEL BENSON WOLF :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 2139 Disciplinary Docket No. 3** 

**Board File No. C2-11-408 (Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia** **County, Criminal Division, No. CP-51-CR 0001918-2012)**  **Attorney Registration No. 52879**  **(Montgomery County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

**AND NOW, this 6 th**  **day of March, 2015, the Joint Petition to Temporaril y**  **Suspend an Attorney is granted and, pursuant to Pa.R.D .E. 214, Michael Benson Wolf**  **is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of** 

**Pa.R.D.E. 217.**
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsTechnical Letter Reports

# Technical Letter Reports – 2023

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 14, 2024
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of
        Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
        2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)           
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 Date:
        December 20, 2007
 
 
 /S/   FIROZ
                  H LALJIFiroz
                  H. LaljiChairman
                  and Chief Executive Officer
# Kansas State Office

760 S Broadway BlvdSalinaKS67401-4604

785-823-4500

760 S Broadway BlvdSalinaKS67401-4604

Kansas

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Kansas 
-  Kansas State Office 

The state office staff provides overall leadership for the activities of Kansas NRCS to help people conserve, maintain and improve our natural resources and environment.

## Welcome to NRCS in Kansas!

### Damarys Mortenson, State Conservationist

Kansas NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, XXXX

##   Employee Directory
# C_2004118EN.01003505.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-381/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 118/71)

By order of 18 March 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-381/03: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 1.11.2003.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: LAWRENCE W. FEW,

 Relator.

 §

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00071-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Lawrence Few has filed a second pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting this Court

issue an order compelling the trial court to appoint an attorney to represent Few in his petition for

habeas corpus. Mandamus relief is denied.

Mandamus relief will not be granted absent the relator’s establishing: (1) no other adequate

remedy exists at law; and (2) that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. Dickens v. Court of

Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial Dist. of Tex., 727 S.W.2d 542, 548 (Tex. Crim. App.

1987). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion. State ex rel. Hill

v. Court of Appealsforthe Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). A discretionary

function may become ministerial when the facts and circumstances dictate but one rational decision.

Buntion v. Harmon, 827 S.W.2d 945, 948 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).

This Court is empowered to direct a trial court to consider and rule on a properly filed

pending motion if: (1) the realtor has asked the trial court to rule; and (2) the trial court has either

refused to rule, or failed to rule within a reasonable time. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426-

27 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). It is the relator’s burden to provide this
2

Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.3(j)(1)(A) (appendix to mandamus petition must contain a copy of any order complained of, or

any other document showing the matter complained of); TEX.R.APP. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file

with the mandamus petition a copy of every document that is material to his claim for relief);

Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 648 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005).

In this case, Few requests that this Court order the trial court to appoint an attorney to

represent him in a habeas corpus action. Although Few has attached file-stamped copies of motions

“To Request the Court For Appointment of Attorney,” there is no evidence that these motions have

been presented to the trial court, and therefore no evidence that the trial court has refused to rule.

As Relator has failed to provide this Court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus

relief, the petition is denied.

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

March 27, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

McClure, J., not participating

(Do Not Publish)
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

Main Website                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan