alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### **EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****By****PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer****RegardingFacts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings**

 

I, Susan Fite, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared.

 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectivenessof disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors andthe audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

 

Date:  November 12, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/ Susan Fite      |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Director of Finance |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 9/30/97 and Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the six months ended 9/30/97 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,129
<SECURITIES>                                    10,394
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                       517
<INVENTORY>                                         80
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,639
<PP&E>                                          21,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,674
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,113)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,135
<SALES>                                          5,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,357
<CGS>                                            1,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
# Advanced Flight Maneuvers (

# * * * ) D

EJ Fly a circle and keep the camera pointed towards you. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible
.



## ...

# ____ .... 

## ___ _ Fly a 4 pointsquare box clockwise while keeping the camera facing in your direction.

Fly a 4 point square box counter-clockwise while keeping the camera facing in your direction.**~** 

# " \

# --------**----------·**

# Advanced Flight Maneuvers

# (* * * ) EJ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the phantom in the dir&c:tion 

### oftravel. 

# r---- ,.._--- '""',
, ' 

# - ...._../-**--"yiiil: ~~r-**  • 1 • 

# 41 ' /, 

# \ 

# , ' 

# , ' , ' 

# . ------ ....,.. ---------

# -· D Fly e circle counter-clockwise end keep the camera pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same end the circle ea uniform as possible.



# [J Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the camera pointed atthe center ofthecircle. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

# Advanced Flight Maneuvers

# <* **) iJ Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. 

### Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.



# [J Fly a Figure 8 with the camera ofthe Phantom pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.



## r.'W Fly Figure 8 patterns wftile experimenting with different orientations. 

## U For example, camera alwaya pointed in a given direction or opposite/ left/rightthe direction oftravel, etc. Be aure to keep the altitude the Mme and the circle as uniform as poi'.Sible.

# Emergency Situations 

# II Return Home

# a Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft away from yourtake off point Tum offthe Remote Controller. The Phantom 

### will enter it's failsafe Return· To-Home Mode. 

### letthe Phantom finish it• a routine and land itselfwithin 2 metenJ ofthe take off point



### 15 meters

Intercepting Return Home

# a Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Bafore you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 

### 50ftaway from yourtake off point. Turn offthe Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return· To·Home Mode. Whenthe Phantom 

### is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower position, then continue flying the Phantom.

# -=v**-- --**  .. •
, 15 meters
# Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) (11/22) Standard Document(52.19 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) Overview(64.47 KB)

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) CPPE(26.27 KB)

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (Ac.) (390) Network Effects Diagram(19.87 KB)

##   Learn More

Conservation Practice Standards
On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.

Conservation Practice Standards Information
Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
# L_2015092EN.01001801.xml

| 8.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/550

of 24 March 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fränkischer Grünkern (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Fränkischer Grünkern’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Fränkischer Grünkern’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fränkischer Grünkern’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fränkischer Grünkern’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Fränkischer Grünkern’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 410, 18.11.2014, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
### SERVED: May 5, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### LW1**:~.\Y** 

### -b P 

### I: tt2

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH D. BARBERA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1083
ORDERDENYING AGENCY MOTION FORDECISION The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed·a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted and Dismiss Appeal. Subsequent to Complainant's Motion, Joseph D. Barbera (hereinafter "Respondent") filed an Answer and other documents. Wherefore, Complainant's Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted having been read and considered, it be and is hereby DENIED.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List

1SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1
Joseph D. Barbera, Respondent 14706 N.E. Erickson Dr. La Center, W A 98629-4405 TEL: NOTPROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED DavidF. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings;M-20 U.S.DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1083 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
# C_2004118EN.01001601.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 7(1)b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Three-dimensional tablets for washing machine or dishwashers - Absolute ground for refusal to register - Distinctive character)

(2004/C 118/28)

Language of the case: English

In Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P: two appeals by Procter & Gamble Company, established in Cincinnati (United States) (Lawyers: C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers ) against the judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2001 in Case T-128/00 Procter & Gamble v OHIM (square tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2785 and Case T-129/00 Procter & Gamble v OHIM (rectangular tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2793, seeking to have those judgments set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: D. Schennen and C. Røhl Søberg) - the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting as the President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders Procter & Gamble Company to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Procter & Gamble Company to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68 of 16.3.2002

1

OJ 84 of 6.4.2002

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Dominick A. Arena, President and Chief Executive Officer, of MedVest Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, (the “Periodic Report”), containing the financial statements of MedVest Holdings Corporation, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

 

(2)      the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MedVest Holdings Corporation.

 

Dated: April 6, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Dominick A. Arena                 |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Dominick A. Arena                     |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2004179EN.01000603.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale (Provincial Tax Court), Novara (Italy), by order of that court of 26 April 2004, in the case of Paolo Vergani against Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Arona (Revenue Agency, Arona Office)

(Case C-207/04)

(2004/C 179/13)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale (Provincial Tax Court), Novara (Italy), of 26 April 2004, received at the Court Registry on 10 May 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Paolo Vergani against Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Arona (Revenue Agency, Arona Office) on the following question:

Does Article 17(4a) of Decree No 917/86 of the President of the Republic infringe, conflict with or in any event create conditions of unequal treatment as between men and women prohibited by Article 141 of the European Union Treaty (previously Article 119) in so far as, in like circumstances, it grants the advantage of taxation of voluntary redundancy incentives and of sums paid in connection with termination of employment relationships at a rate reduced to one-half (50 %) for workers who have passed the age of 50 years in the case of women and the age of 55 years in the case of men (1)?

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 14 February 1976, p. 40.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelo Esposito, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 879]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 5, 1995 *(People v Esposito,*216 AD2d 317 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 30, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
# MESABAAIRliNES

.**~** • ..7 June 17,2010 Dennis DeVany and Todd M. Homan EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation Room 64171 400 

## i h Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20590
Re: Amendment 1 to Proposal for Mesaba's Essential Air

### ~rvice at GLH-MEM Greenville, Mississippi. Docket OST-2008-0209. 

# V Dear Mr. DeVany and Mr. Homan: As you know, Mesaba Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Mesaba ("Mesaba") is retiring its fleet ofSaab 340 Aircraft before the end of2011, and therefore cannot commit to a rate agreement for the Department's standard 2-yearperiod. Accordingly, Mesaba hereby amends its proposal to stipulate an end to the proposed subsidy rate on the earlier ofOctober 1, 2011, or 180 days after Mesaba informs the Department ofthe retirement ofthe Saab aircraft used for this service. At the appropriate time, Mesaba intends to submit a new bid proposal based onthe aircraft that are available in Mesaba's fleet. We look forward to the opportunity to continue providing essential air service to the Greenville community. 

# (V:6S

# C ed

, John G. Spanjers President

1000 BLUE GENTIAN ROAD, SUITE 200, EAGAN, MN 55 121 , ,,,,
Order entered February 16 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00528

- CR

TIMOTHY SIM SMITHERMAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18

- 50887

- T

O RDER

The State’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief is

GRANTED , and we ORDER the State’s brief filed on or before MARCH 15,

2023

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management

# Credibility Assessment Framework for Critical Boiling Transition Models: A generic safety case to determine the credibility of critical heat flux and critical power models, Draft for Comment (NUREG/KM-0013)

This publication has been issued for public comment. Comments will be accepted until May 24, 2019. To submit comments, please see Docket ID Number NRC–2019-0043. 

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/KM-0013, Draft for Comment (PDF - 2.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 2019

**Prepared by:** J.S. Kaizer R. Anzalone E. Brown M. Panicker S. Haider J. Gilmer T. Drzewiecki A. Attard (retired, unable to comment on final version)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Critical boiling transition (CBT) occurs when a flow regime that has a higher heat transfer rate transitions to a flow regime that has a significantly lower heat transfer rate. Models that predict a CBT are a necessary part of reactor safety analysis because they are used to determine plant safety limits. Therefore, the review of CBT models has been a focus of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) since its inception in 1975. 

This work presents a generic safety case in the form of a credibility assessment framework that combines aspects of goal structuring notation and maturity assessment. This framework is focused on the credibility assessment of CBT models with specific application to reactor safety analysis. The NRC has performed many such assessments and has generated this framework based on the experience of current and former NRC staff, as well as previous staff reviews as summarized in staff evaluations. This document includes a survey of the important technical and regulatory literature; a detailed technical discussion of CBT models and their application; and a suggested framework for CBT models. This NUREG/KM summarizes the knowledge the NRC staff has developed over the course of 40 years of CBT model and analysis reviews.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
*June 6, 1939.*

#### A. F. Wagner Iron Works, Respondent, vs. Convoy Motor Freight, Inc., Defendant: Advance Transportation Company, Garnishee Defendant and Appellant.

For the appellant: *Lecher, Michael, Whyte & Spohn,*attorneys, and *Herman E. Friedrich*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Tibbs & Tibbs*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.