alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003950
<NAME>                        PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                              7,712
<SECURITIES>                       21,016
<RECEIVABLES>                       5,403
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                         4,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   39,938
<PP&E>                              4,146
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     41,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               4,441
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               75
<OTHER-SE>                         36,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       41,424
<SALES>                            17,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   17,036
<CGS>                               6,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     5,103
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 3,317
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        3,317
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.44



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHILDTIME
LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 21, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-21-2000
<CASH>                                           1,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                       308
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,194
<PP&E>                                          50,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,294
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,032
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (90)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                       785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
# C_2004236EN.01000302.xml

| 23.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3346 — NYK REEFERS/LAURITZEN COOL/LCL JV)

(2004/C 236/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3346. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3346. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1107

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jeremiah Taylor

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: December 12, 2022

Filed: January 13, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Jeremiah Taylor guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm. 

Taylor appeals arguing it was plain error to admit evidence collected during a traffic

stop. We affirm. 
Taylor was stopped for driving a car with stolen plates. During the stop an

officer saw a gun through the car window. Knowing Taylor was a felon, the officer

placed Taylor in custody and searched the car, including the locked trunk. Taylor did

not move to suppress any evidence before the trial and did not object to any evidence

during the trial. Taylor now asserts it was plain error for the district court1

 to admit

evidence collected from the trunk of the car. 

Defendants are required to bring motions to suppress evidence before trial “if

the basis for the motion is then reasonably available[.]” Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3). 

Taylor was aware that the government intended to use the evidence and any possible

grounds for suppression before trial. Untimely motions can be reviewed “if the party

shows good cause.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(c)(3). No explanation for the delay or good

cause was given, therefore “we need not consider the merits” of the claim. United

States v. Anderson, 783 F.3d 727, 741 (8th Cir. 2015).

Even if we were to assume a showing of good cause, the issue would be

reviewed for plain-error. United States v. Navarette, 996 F.3d 870, 875 (8th Cir.

2021). It was not error to admit evidence found in the trunk. “[A] police officer who

has lawfully made a roadside stop of a vehicle may search the passenger compartment

and trunk of that vehicle if probable cause exists to believe that contraband or

evidence of criminal activity is located inside the vehicle.” United States v. Walker,

840 F.3d 477, 483 (8th Cir. 2016). Given the firearm and stolen plates it was

reasonable to believe a search of the trunk would yield additional evidence. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgement of the district court. 

______________________________

1The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, then United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, now Chief Judge.

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2007 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2007

    To prohibit the awarding of Federal Pell Grants to incarcerated 
                  individuals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

 Mr. Collins of New York (for himself and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the awarding of Federal Pell Grants to incarcerated 
                  individuals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kids Before Cons Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON WAIVERS FOR EXPERIMENTAL SITES.

    Section 487A(b)(3) (20 U.S.C. 1094a(b)(3)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
                    ``(C) Limitations.--Nothing in subparagraph (B) or 
                any other provision of this Act shall be construed to--
                            ``(i) authorize the Secretary to waive the 
                        prohibition under section 401(b)(6) on awarding 
                        a Federal Pell Grant to an incarcerated 
                        individual or any other individual described in 
                        such section 401(b)(6);
                            ``(ii) authorize the Secretary to waive the 
                        prohibition under section 484(b)(5) on awarding 
                        a loan under this title to an incarcerated 
                        individual; or
                            ``(iii) authorize the Secretary to award 
                        funds to institutions of higher education for 
                        providing postsecondary education to 
                        incarcerated individuals.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2015322EN.01001201.xml

| 8.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/12

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2266

of 24 November 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Asperges du Blayais (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Asperges du Blayais’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Asperges du Blayais’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Asperges du Blayais’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Asperges du Blayais’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Asperges du Blayais’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6 Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 238, 21.7.2015, p. 13.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
        TO**


**18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
        Philip
        McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
        June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
        in
        such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
        the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen
        Communications, Inc.


Date:
                      August 13, 2007
                By:
                /s/
                      Philip M. McDermottName:
                    Philip
                    M. McDermottTitle:
                    Chief
                    Financial Officer
# C_2004168EN.01001201.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/12

---

Action brought on 22 April 2004 by Joël De Bry against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-157/04)

(2004/C 168/22)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 April 2004 by Joël De Bry, residing in Woluwe-St-Lambert (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision establishing his career development report covering the period 1 July to 31 December 2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision establishing his career development report covering the period 1 July to 31 December 2002;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant states first of all that he was assessed by an assessor of the same grade as himself who was competing with the applicant for promotion. In the applicant's submission, that fact gives rise to a conflict of interests on the part of his assessor. The assessor did not inform the appointing authority of the position, contrary to Article 14 of the Staff Regulations.

The applicant then claims that there is an inconsistency between the assessments in the contested report and the marks awarded to him. He also claims that there has been a breach of the obligation to state reasons and of the rights of the defence in connection with a comment made by the validator concerning the applicant's alleged failure to observe normal working hours.

---
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00119

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1630377D

Before Birdwel l, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M OSES 

### G ONZALEZ 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Moses Gonzalez attempts to appeal from the trial court ’ s order granting the
State ’ s pretrial “ Motion to Hold Defendant W ithout Bond .” Via letter, we notified
Gonzalez of our concern that we lack jurisdiction to consider the trial court ’ s order because it is not appealable. See Ragston v. State , 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). This court also informed Gonzalez that unless he o r any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal may be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Gonzalez did not file a response. We do not have jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals fro m pretrial orders regarding the denial of bond sought by motion. Ragston , 424 S.W.3d at 52

. But cf.
Ex parte Peyton , No. 02

- 16

- 00029

- CR, 2016 WL 2586698, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth May 5, 2016) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (explaining that court of appeals does have jurisdiction over appeal from denial of pretrial habeas corpus application seeking ba il reduction), pet. dism’d , No. PD

- 0677

- 16, 2017 WL 1089960 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 22, 2017) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). Because
Gonzalez is attempting to appeal the trial court ’ s pretrial order denying him bond on
the State ’ s motion, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Ragston , 424 S.W.3d at 52.
Per Curiam Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered: October 1, 2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02364]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: February 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 110 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-29, CP2015-38.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2015-02364 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHILDTIME
LEARNING CENTERS, INC. FORM 10-Q/A NO. 1 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY
2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (AS RESTATED). THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2, 1998 IS BEING
PROVIDED TO AMEND ITEM 1 AND 2 TO REFLECT THE PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED RECOGNITION
OF SCHEDULED RENT INCREASES ON A STRAIGHT-LINE BASIS OVER THE TERM OF THE
RELATED LEASE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                           1,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,952
<PP&E>                                          43,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,364
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,081
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,612
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (188)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>