alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffOffice of Investigations Annual Report (NUREG-1830)

# Office of Investigations – Annual Report FY 2018 (NUREG-1830, Volume 15)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1830, Volume 15 (PDF - 761 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2018**Date Published:** February 2019

Office of Investigations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission with an overview of the Office of Investigations' (OI's) activities, mission, and purpose, along with the framework of case inventory with highlights of significant cases that OI completed during fiscal year 2018 (see Staff Requirements Memorandum COMJC-89-8, dated June 30, 1989). This is the 30th OI annual report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
In the Senate of the United States, 

January 22, 2018. 

Resolved, That the Senate agree to the amendment of 

the House of Representatives to the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 195) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title 44, 

United States Code, to restrict the distribution of free printed copies of the Federal Register to Members of Congress 

and other officers and employees of the United States, and 

for other purposes.’’, with the following 

SENATE AMENDMENT TO HOUSE AMENDMENT TO 

SENATE AMENDMENT: 

1 On page 1, line 6, strike øFebruary 16¿ and insert: 

2 February 8. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 195 

HOUSE AMENDMENT TO 

SENATE AMENDMENT TO 

SENATE AMENDMENT
#### Mary Ward *v.*Seth Ward, *et al.*

In suits by married women, a *prochein amp*is necessary not only to secure the costs, but when her husband is a defendant, to interpose a suitable adviser; and this rule is not dispensed with, even where the wife sues *informa pauperis.*

The plaintiff being entitled to a separate estate under a marriage settlement, filed her bill, by permission of the court, in *forma pauperis*against her husband *Seth*Ward, *Henry G. Montford,*the trustee, *and-Edward Williams,*which last named defendant was charged with having in his possession, claiming as his own, some of the property belonging to the plaintiff under the marriage settlement, he having notice of the plaintiff’s *title,*at the time he purchased it.

The prayer of the bill was to liave an account taken of the estate under the settlement, and that the present trustee might be removed and another appointed, and that the trust fund be secured. The defendant *Williams*demurred and for cause of demurrer, among *others*especially assigned this, that the plaintiff is a feme covert and has no right to sue alone.

On the last circuit, at *Onslow, his*Honor Judge Donneie overruled the demurrer, and the plaintiff, under leave of the Court, appealed,

*554
      *Bryan*for the plaintiff.

*Bcvereux*for the defendants.

Dakieu, Judge.

After stating the material fact as above, proceeded. — A feme covert having a separate estate, may in a Court of Equity be sued as a feme sole, and be proceeded against without her husband, for in respect of her separate estate, she is looked upon as a feme sole. In *Dubois*v. *Hole,*(2 *Ver.*614.) Mr. *Raithby*the annotator, has collected and digested all the authorities on this question. In a Court of Equity, *baron*and *feme*are considered as two distinct persons and therefore a wife by her *proehein amy,*may sue her own husband. The question to be settled on this demurrer is, can she sue alone, *informa pauperis.*The courts of equity, as well as the courts of law, permit persons to sue in *forma pauperis,*when proper affidavits are made. (2 *Mad. Ch.*256.) But I can find no case where a wife has been permitted to sue her husband in that character. I cannot find any case, where the wife has been permitted to sue alone in a Court of Equity.— Where the husband is made a party defendant,the invariable practice is, for the feme covert to sue by her *pro-chein ami.*The rule is established, I expect, not only to secure costs, but to have a responsible person who would be liable if the process of the court should be abused, and also that a proper and fit adviser might interpose to prevent domestic feuds, and at the same time protect the feme from the frauds and power of the husband. (3 *P. Wms.*39.)

The plaintiff asks leave *to*amend her Bill by adding a *proehein amy.*This is an appeal under the late act of Assembly, from an interlocutory decree. This court has no power to make any order or decree in the cause, except on the point appealed from. We are of opinion that the court below erred, in overruling the demurrer; it should have been sustained. This opinion will be certified to the court below.

Per curiam. — Decree overruled.
# Events

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 

# Filter Events by:

### Wisconsin State Technical Committee Meeting - April 2024

The Natural Resources Conservation Service in Wisconsin will host a hybrid (in-person with Microsoft Teams video conference option) State Technical Committee Meeting on Thursday April 18, 2024 at the USDA-NRCS State Office in Madison, Wisconsin.

WisconsinAirAnimalsClimateEnergyLandPlantsSoilWaterWildlife HabitatCroplandsEasementsForestryInsects and PollinatorsOrganic AgricultureRange & PastureSoil HealthTreesUrban AgricultureWetlandsWildlifeConservation Stewardship ProgramEnvironmental Quality Incentives ProgramRegional Conservation Partnership Program

### Winter Grazing Pasture Walk

This pasture walk will leave you with the knowledge to guide you towards successfully implementing winter grazing on your farm!

WisconsinAnimalsLandRange & Pasture
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aavid
Thermal Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Brian A. Byrne, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: August 10, 2004                       /s/ Brian A. Byrne
                                                 ------------------------
                                             Brian A. Byrne
                                             Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial
                                             Officer

                                       25
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.14.1

                                   ----------

                            Supplemental Description
                                       of
                       Pegasus Communications Corporation
                            Short-Term Incentive Plan
                            (Corporate and Satellite)
                             For Calendar Year 2004

Executive officers of Pegasus Communications Corporation participate in the
Pegasus Communications Corporation Short-Term Incentive Plan (Corporate,
Satellite and Business Development) for calendar year 2004 (the "Plan"), see
Exhibit 10.15 to this Form 10-K, along with corporate and satellite management.
This description is intended to supplement Exhibit 10.14 to provide a more
specific description of the criteria and types of payments that can be made
under the Plan. For 2004, the amount of short-term incentive that can be earned
is based upon "free cash flow", Quality Metrics, and Pre-Marketing Cash Flow.
The term "free cash flow" used in the Plan ("Plan Free Cash Flow") is unique to
the Plan and is not identical to the amounts of free cash flow publicly reported
by Pegasus. For purposes of the Plan, "free cash flow" consists of various
inclusions and exclusions specific to particular operations or divisions of
Pegasus or events affecting Pegasus. For calendar year 2004, employees receive
payments under the Plan based upon an January to December Plan year. The Plan
provides for three tiers of payments as follows: (i) Tier 1 Payments: if Plan
Free Cash Flow achieves an established calendar month target(the "Monthly
Target"), which is the same target for each month of the calendar year),
participants will receive 1/12 of their annual targets for each month that
Pegasus achieves this Plan Free Cash Flow; (ii) Tier 2 Payments: if Plan Free
Cash Flow is greater than the Monthly Target in any calendar month, 35% of the
excess amount for a given month will be allocated to a Tier 2 pool. Payment of
this pool will be determined by whether or not Pegasus achieves it's Quality
Metrics. Each metric achieved pays 20% each month. Payments to the participants
will be based upon their respective short-term incentive targets as a percentage
of total short-term incentive targets; and Tier 3 Payments: if Pegasus exceeds
its Pre-Marketing Cash Flow budget for the quarter, an additional $250,000 will
be allocated to participants based upon their respective short-term incentive
targets as a percent of total short term incentive targets. Payments made under
the Plan are made in cash and are payable monthly and quarterly after the
conclusion of a calendar month once the amount of Plan Free Cash Flow is
determined.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,306)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,156
<PP&E>                                           2,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (408)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,456
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,123
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 617<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,643)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,643)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
<FN>
<F1>INTEREST EXPENSE ONLY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### *ALANSON CAPEHART v. KADER BIGGS *&*CO.

*Appeal, notice of.*

An appeal will not be dismissed upon the ground that no notice of appeal was given, where the record shows that an appeal bond was filed and approved by the court. The filing the bond and its approval in open court is notice to the appellee.

*Civil Actiok*tried at Fall Term, 1883, of NojrthamptoN Superior Court, before *McKoy, J.*

*A*motion to dismiss the defendants’ appeal was made in this •court.

*Messrs, li. B. Peebles*and *Hinsdale & Devereux,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. W. Bagley, Mullen & Moore, Fuller & Snoiu,*and *E. ■C. Smith,*for defendants.

*

Mr. Justice Mérrimos" having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing •of this case.

Ashe, J.

In this court a diminution of the record was suggested, and on motion of the plaintiff’s counsel, a writ of *certio-rari*was issued to the clerk of the superior court of Northampton county, directing him to make out and transmit to this court .a correct transcript of the record in this case.

In return to the *certiorari,*the clerk sends up another transcript, accompanied with his certificate, that the record heretofore sent to this court was, in all respects, correct, except as to the *374expression, “notice of appeal waived”; said expression was inadvertently put by him in the case. He says it nowhere appears in the case, except in the statement of the case on appeal filed by L. E. Dettrick (one of the defendants), and supposing it was true in fact, he put it in the record sent' to the supreme court. He says, “ the error occurred in this way: The appellant filed his statement of case, and the appellee filed his exceptions thereto, and the appellant did not ask the court to settle the ease, and in sending up the record, I endeavored to consolidate the two.”

Upon the return of the writ of *certiorari,*the plaintiff’s counsel moved to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground the defendant had given the plaintiff no notice of appeal.

Taking it to be true, as certified by the clerk, that there was no waiver of appeal properly upon the record, yet we do find in the record the entry, “Bond in the sum of $250, filed and approved by the court.”

The plaintiff’s counsel is supposed to have notice of what is done in open court, especially in a case where he appears as counsel for one of the parties, and the taking the appeal bond in court, and its approval by the judge in open court, was actual notice of the appeal, as effectively so as if the notice had been given in the manner prescribed by law. Although the plaintiff’s counsel did not waive the notice, he had notice, and there is no ground upon which to sustain his motion.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore disallowed.

Motion denied.
Exhibit
      32.1


Form
      10-KSB


Ogden
      Golf Co. Corporation


File
      No.
      333-105075














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Ogden
      Golf Co. Corporation(the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
      year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
      or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
      and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
      Code.





I,
      Mark
      A. Scharmann, President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer of the Company, certify that:





1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Ogden Golf Co.
      Corporation.








Dated:
                October 31, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Mark A. ScharmannMark
                A. ScharmannPresidentPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 21, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 21, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A1887. MARGARET HYLTON JONES d/b/a MARGARET JONES & ASSOCIATES v. BROCK BUILT, LLC. et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Lasalle Nuclear Power Plant

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Vision  Global  Solutions,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Jean-Paul  Ouellette,  Chief  Executive  Officer o and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2006

                                    /s/ Jean-Paul Ouellette
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-69-2014]

On September 25, 2014, the Calhoun-Victoria Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 155, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Tenaris Bay City, Inc., within Subzone 155D, in Bay City, Texas.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 59473-59474, 10-2-2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01722 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of The Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David D. Lee, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodpresented therein.

 
|   | /s/ David D. Lee        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | David D. Lee            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 7, 2004             |

 

A signed original of thewritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
|Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Learning Care Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended January 7, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                      
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Frank M. Jerneycic                                                             
|                                                                 
|Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial Officer
    and Treasurer
    February 22, 2005

|26
|--