alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Annual Security Public Meeting 

November 8, 2007 

Acronym Listing

COL: Combined Operating License 

DBT: Design Basis Threat 

DEDO: Deputy Executive Director for Operations (EDO) 

DHS: Department of Homeland Security 

DHS / DNDO: DHS Domestic Nuclear Detection Office 

DHS/ IP: DHS Office of Infrastructure Protection 

DoD: Department of Defense 

DOE: Department of Energy 

DOJ: Department of Justice 

FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation 

FOF: Force on Force 

GCC: Government Coordinating Council 

HSC: Homeland Security Council 

MC&A: Material Control and Accounting 

NCTC: National Counterterrorism Center 

NMSS: Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

NRR: Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 

NSCC: Nuclear Sector Coordinating Council 

NSIR: Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 

OSRE: Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation 

PPSDP: Physical Protection SDP 

RAMQC: Radioactive Material Quantities of Concern 

SDP: Significance Determination Process 

SFRP: The Security Findings Review Panel 

USCG: U.S. Coast Guard
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 15, 2006
                                /s/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Claudia M. Pieropan
                                Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                       CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



         In connection with the Form 10KSB of Prevention Insurance.com for the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, I, Scott Goldsmith, President of Prevention
Insurance.com, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss1350 as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge and
believe that:

(1)      Such form 10KSB for the year ended April 30, 2005, fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934: and

(2)      The information contained is such Form 10KSB for the year ended April
         30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of Prevention Insurance.com.

                                                     Prevention Insurance.com


Date: 7/27/05                                        By:  /s/ Scott Goldsmith
                                                          -------------------
                                                            Scott Goldsmith
                                                            President
<PAGE>   1

                         [ERNST & YOUNG LLP LETTERHEAD]


               INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance
sheet of Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May
2, 1997, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for
the three-month and six-month periods ended May 2, 1997 and May 3, 1996, and
the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods
ended May 2, 1997 and May 3, 1996.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
referred to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of November 1, 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the year then
ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated December 19, 1996, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of November 1, 1996, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


May 29, 1997






       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActFOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

# 2014 FOIAs Related to Japan's Emergency

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Public Documents (ADAMS)

### Filter by Document Type

 All 

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Public Documents (ADAMS)

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-75378and No. 333-132175 of our report dated January 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheet of Calavo Growers, Inc. as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period endedOctober 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule as listed in Item 15 of this Form10-K for each of the years in the two-year period ended October 31, 2005, which report appears inthe October 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of Calavo Growers, Inc./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 22, 2019

No. 04-18-00623-CR

Matthew SERNA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-0186-CRA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on October 2, 2018. On January 9, 2019, we 

ordered court reporter Leticia Escamilla to file the reporter’s record no later than February 1, 

2019. On February 4, 2019 and February 12, 2019, Ms. Escamilla filed a FIFTH notification of 

late reporter’s record along with a status report of cases she is working on. Ms. Escamilla

indicated she anticipated the reporter’s record would be completed by February 18, 2019. Ms. 

Escamilla has not yet filed the reporter’s record as ordered. Ms. Escamilla is ORDERED to file 

the reporter’s record with this court no later than March 1, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 40.2 

(“the court of appeals must hear and determine a criminal appeal at the earliest possible time”). 

If the record is not received by March 1, 2019, a show cause order will issue directing 

Ms. Escamilla to appear on a day certain and show cause why she should not be held in contempt 

for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court is instructed to cause a copy of this order to 

be served on Ms. Escamilla by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to 

addressee only, or to give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### City of Milwaukee, Appellant, vs. Plath, Respondent.

*March 18*

April *9, 1914.*

*Assault and battery: Direction of verdict: Appeal: Harmless errors.*

Where, upon a trial for an assault and battery in violation of a city ordinance, there was such a conflict in the testimony as ordinarily calls for determination by a jury, hut both the district court and, on appeal, the municipal court directed a verdict of “not guilty,” and it is extremely doubtful whether a different- result would be reached by any jury, the judgment of acquittal should be affirmed on the ground that the error did not affect any substantial right of the city.

Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Milwaukee county: A. C. Backus, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The defendant was arrested for committing an assault and *587battery upon one Minzer, July 25, 1912, in violation of a city ordinance. He was tried in the district court and at the close of the trial the court directed a verdict of not guilty. The city appealed to the municipal court, where a like result followed. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed in •favor of the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Daniel W. Iloan,*city attorney, and *Marie A. Kline,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Kline.*

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *Rubin & Zabel,*attorneys, and *F. L. Fawcett,*of counsel, and oral argument by *W. G. Zabel.*

ViNjE, J.

The complaining witness, Minzer, testified that on July 25th he was hired by defendant to work in his restaurant and that he understood his day’s work closed at 7 o’clock in the evening. A little after 7 he went down stairs to get his coat from the cloak room. There he met defendant, who told him to go back to work till 8 o’clock. Minzer refused, and demanded his money. A dispute arose in which both profanity and obscenity were indulged in, especially by Minzer. Defendant had in his hand a small stick of wood, about half an inch thick and nearly a foot long, to which keys were attached, and Minzer claims defendant struck him with this stick on the head while he was walking towards the cloak room and without any offer of violence on his part. The defendant testifies that he struck Minzer just as the latter was in the act of assaulting him and that the blow given was in self-defense. In this he is corroborated by three other eyewitnesses to the altercation. It is true there is here a conflict of testimony that ordinarily should be submitted to the jury for determination. But in view of the fact that two courts who saw and heard the witnesses have directed a verdict for defendant, we have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed. It is extremely doubtful, in view of the whole evidence in the case, if a different result *588would be reached by any jury. It cannot therefore be said that the error complained of has affected appellant’s substantial rights. In such cases the statute (sec. 3072m, Stats. 1913) and our decisions *(Johnson v. Iron River,*149 Wis. 139, 135 N. W. 522) alike require an affirmance of the judgment.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The Los Alamos National Laboratory/New Mexico State University Filter Plugging Test Facility: Description and Preliminary Test Results (NUREG/CR-3242, LA-9929-MS)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3242 (PDF - 1.07 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 1983**Date Published:**October 1983

**Prepared by:** D.L. Fenton, J.J. Dallman, P.R. Smith Mechanical Engineering Department New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003

and

R.A. Martin, W.S. Gregory LosAlamos National Laboratory LosAlamos, New Mexico 87545 

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN A-7029

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A facility to test the plugging effects of combustion products on high-efficiency particulate air filters has been constructed. This facility can supply experimental data to support pressure-drop models of filter plugging under fire accident conditions, which are needed for use in an existing fire accident analysis computer code. The test facility includes a specially designed null-balance filter-weighing system. The resolution of this system is approximately 2 to 3g out of 14 kg for a commercial 0.6- by 0.6-m filter. Using this system, commercial filters can be tested to provide data with which to correlate pressure drop and smoke aerosol mass accumulation and flow rate. Some recently accomplished tests and future test plans are discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2016050DE.01003702.xml

| 26.2.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 50/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 50/37

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/2307 der Kommission vom 10. Dezember 2015 zur Zulassung von Menadion-Natriumbisulfit und Menadion-Nicotinamidbisulfit als Zusatzstoffe in Futtermitteln für alle Tierarten

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 326 vom 11. Dezember 2015
  )

Seite 51, Anhang, Zeile 3a710, Spalte 3:

anstatt:

„
  ‚Menadion Natriumbisulfit‘ oder ‚Vitamin K3
  ‘
  “

muss es heißen:

„
  ‚Menadion-Natriumbisulfit‘ oder ‚Vitamin K3
  ‘
  “.

Seite 52, Anhang, Zeile 3a711, Spalte 3:

anstatt:

„
  ‚Menadion Natriumbisulfit‘ oder ‚Vitamin K3‘
  “

muss es heißen:

„
  ‚Menadion-Nicotinamidbisulfit‘ oder ‚Vitamin K3
  ‘
  “.

---
# Soil Survey

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Soil 
-  Soil Survey 

Links to Soil Surveys by State and Web Soil Survey.

Soil Surveys by State
Historical soil surveys have been scanned, converted to portable document format (pdf), and archived on a public download site.

Web Soil Survey
Web Soil Survey (WSS) provides soil data and information produced by the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Exhibit  10(a)

  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 


We consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305
on Form N-1A of our report dated November 24, 2010, relating to the financial
statements and financials highlights of BlackRock Global Opportunities
Portfolio, BlackRock International Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock U.S.
Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio and
BlackRock Science & Technology Opportunities Portfolio, each a series of
BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock
Funds for the year ended September 30, 2010, and to the references to us under
the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and “Financial
Statements” in the Statement of Additional Information, which are a part of
such Registration Statement.   


/s/ Deloitte
& Touche LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    January
 26, 2011
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                             CERTIFICATE OF DECREASE

                                       OF

                    SERIES A $20 CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                       INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.

                       (Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the
                        Delaware General Corporation Law)


                  The undersigned hereby certifies that, by unanimous written
consent of the Board of Directors of Integrated Security Systems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), effective as of March 13, 2001, the
Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted a resolution retiring 65,500
shares of a previously-established series of the preferred stock of the
Corporation, par value $0.01 per share, which series was designated "Series A
$20 Convertible Preferred Stock" pursuant to a Certificate of Designation filed
with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 2, 1996, and providing that the
shares so retired shall resume the status of authorized but unissued shares of
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, thereby decreasing the number of
shares of preferred stock of the Corporation that are designated as Series A $20
Convertible Preferred Stock from 75,000 to 9,500.

                  In witness whereof the Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 14th day of March, 2001.

                                       INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


                                       By:  /s/ C.A. RUNDELL, JR.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                            Name:  C.A. Rundell, Jr.
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) PROMULGATED UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Todd ParkerTodd ParkerCo-Chief Executive Officer (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Co-Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
#### MOUNT SAINT MARY’S COLLEGE, Appellant, v. The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY and W. Harley Miller, Inc., Appellees.

No. 9805.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 8, 1965.

Decided April 22, 1965.

George Cochran Doub, Baltimore, Md. (Robert F. Skutch, Jr., Joseph M. Wyatt, Baltimore, Md., and Robert D. Klages, Washington, D. C. and Weinberg & Green, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant.

Richard W. Emory, Baltimore, Md. (William J. McCarthy and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action recovery was sought by appellants upon a bid bond executed by the appellees. The latter counterclaimed for cancellation of the bid and return of the bond for mistake in the bid. Hearing the case without a jury, the Court determined that the law of Maryland, the place of the entire transaction, required that the bid be rescinded and the bond redelivered.

On appeal from this decision, we accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated by the District Judge in his written opinion, and affirm. See President and Council of Mount Saint Mary’s College v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company et al., 233 F.Supp. 787 (September 3, 1964).

Affirmed.