alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's financial statements included in the Form 10-Q for the period-end
indicated below and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         826
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (454)
<INVENTORY>                                 20,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            66,924
<PP&E>                                      65,047
<DEPRECIATION>                             (32,433)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             136,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,508
<BONDS>                                     24,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       152
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               136,565
<SALES>                                    136,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           136,195
<CGS>                                      109,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                   654
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                (463)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,064)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,995
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.31


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER OF PAINCARE HOLDINGS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PainCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randy Lubinsky, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark Szporka, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                                  
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer             
|Date: August 14, 2006                               
|                                                    
|/s/ Mark Szporka                                    
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer
|Date: August 14, 2006
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Characterizing Explosive Effects on Underground Structures (NUREG/CR-7201)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7201 (PDF - 6.35 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2013**Date Published:** September 2015

**Prepared by:** A. H. Chowdhury, CNWRA T. E. Wilt, CNWRA

Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses Southwest Research Institute® 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, Texas 78238-5166

Kris Jamgochian, NRC Project Manager Peter S. Lee, NRC Technical Monitor

NRC Job Code N4128

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A literature review and finite element analyses were conducted to characterize the effects of explosions on underground structures for explosive charges located close to and on the ground surface. Explosive charge weights were selected to be consistent with Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIEDs) terrorists make mostly using chemicals and available precursor materials. The phenomena associated with air and surface explosions of VBIEDs, propagation of their dynamic waves through air, crater formation, and propagation through subsurface media are similar to those of conventional high explosive military weapons. Empirical equations for predicting these blast-induced effects and designing underground structures under explosive loads are available in the literature. These empirical equations, however, do have a specific range of applicability. Numerical analysis techniques (e.g., finite element) also require specific assumptions and idealizations. A limited finite element parametric study was used to investigate the influence of important parameters. These influences include the explosive charge weight and how the distance of a point in the subsurface soil from the location of explosion affects the explosion-generated pressure distribution in the underground soil. The blast-induced pressure wave in the soil surrounding an underground structure results in time-dependent loading (pressure or impulse force) of the underground structure. The current methodology for the designing underground structures subjected to explosive loads uses concepts and provisions of other specific codes, standards, and design manuals commonly used in designing reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete, masonry, and steel structures. An underground structure that may be subjected to both explosive and seismic loads should consider both types of loads in appropriate combinations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# L_2015142EN.01002801.xml

| 6.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 142/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 142/28

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/874

of 27 May 2015

on the acceptance of a third State's contribution to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (EUTM Mali/1/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/34/CFSP of 17 January 2013 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2013/34/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to invite third States to offer contributions and to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2013/34/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to invite third States to offer contributions and to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following the recommendation on a contribution from the Republic of Albania (‘Albania’) by the EU Mission Commander and the recommendation from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Albania should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendation on a contribution from the Republic of Albania (‘Albania’) by the EU Mission Commander and the recommendation from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Albania should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution from Albania to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Albania is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUTM Mali.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 14, 18.1.2013, p. 19.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' JUNE 30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,374)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,417
<PP&E>                                       1,459,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                (96,491)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,552,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,855
<BONDS>                                        614,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     855,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,552,867
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,387
<CGS>                                           57,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Gargus,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1360, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodpresented therein.

 
|   | /s/ Robert  G. Gargus    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert G.  Gargus        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | November 5,  2004        |

 

A signedoriginal of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000                                  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 675
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    37,159
<PP&E>                                              16,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      70,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               31,611
<BONDS>                                             14,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                                12
<OTHER-SE>                                          22,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        70,041
<SALES>                                                674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,155
<CGS>                                                3,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
## SEI~VED 

## AUGUST 22, 2012

,. --··· ·RP 

## ln 1 

## T

OF · . '.i:J 1 /\ '1 i lV**Ct~** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

### TRANSPORTAT~QN\!SPOHTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' \
..

## ,!<IT OPERAT!Ol\)S

WASHINGTON, DC

_____________ :UJ.IDJl 

### 23 ;.'\ CJ: 

### IS IN THE MATTER OF KALITTA AIR, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0782

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011GL230099) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

.,\ p.. ./. ·-<'' onnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY FederalAviationAdministration , 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 

### ONE COPY George W. Kelsey, Respondent's Counsel · 

### Kalitta Air, LLC 2395 S. Huron Parkway, Suite 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 TEL: 734-973-1222 FAX: 734-973-1223 Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

### Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 600 18-4696 TEL: 847-294-7713 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S:E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 ·

. TEL: 202-366-2132

FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0782 (Civil Penalty Action)



# ..

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or;by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2Wl000,Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · · 

### -2-
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Investigation of Cable and Cable System Fire Test Parameters (NUREG/CR-4112, US 75-1)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.17B


                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

          THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") is made as of this 16th day
of March, 2001 to that certain EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 30,
l999, as amended (the "Employment Agreement"), by and between ROBERT HENSLEY
("Employee") and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. ("Employer").

               FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to
the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

          1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the
Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be February 1,
2003.
          2. Effective July 1, 2000 and unless otherwise increased in the
discretion of the Company, Base Salary shall be $254,950.

          Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any
conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of
the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective
meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall
hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first above written.

JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.

By:  /s/: Robert N. Wildrick                        /s/: Robert Hensley
  ---------------------------                       --------------------
  Robert N. Wildrick,                               ROBERT HENSLEY
   Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffStatus of the Decommissioning Program (NUREG-1814)

# Status of the Decommissioning Program: 2008 Annual Report (NUREG-1814, Rev. 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1814, Rev. 2 (PDF - 2.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2009**Date Published:**February 2009

**Prepared by:**R. Chang  G. Gnugnoli

Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides a comprehensive overview of the Decommissioning Program of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Its purpose is to provide a stand-alone reference document that describes the decommissioning process and summarizes the status of decommissioning activities, under NRC and Agreement State jurisdiction, from October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008. This includes the decommissioning of complex materials sites, commercial reactors, research and test reactors, uranium recovery facilities, and fuel cycle facilities. Additionally, this report discusses accomplishments of the decommissioning program in fiscal year (FY) 2008; identifies the key decommissioning program issues that the staff will address in FY 2009; and provides information Agreement States have supplied on decommissioning in their States.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00493
- CR

Jarrod Anthonie Scales , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 21
- 1601
- K368 THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Jarrod Anthonie Scales’s appointed counsel, Jessica S. Freud , has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. In h er motion, counsel asserts that good cause exists for h er withdrawal because , although she has nearly completed drafting appellant’s brief, Scales has made certain demands “regarding the exact contents of [the brief] and the way he wishes that it be filed with the court, to which counsel cannot agree.”

Indigent defendants are entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal. Cooks v.
State , 240 S.W.3d 906, 910 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) . The legislature, however, has given the trial court the responsibility of appointing counsel in criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
art. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2) . When counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent2

defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez
v. State , 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, no pet.) ; Vargas v. State , No. 03

- 16

- 00083

- CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 686 3 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin June 30, 2016, order) (mem. op. , not designate d for publication ).

We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2)

. Upon remand, counsel is instructed to refile her motion to withdraw, and the trial court shall hold a hearing to determine whether to grant the motion. In addition, the trial court shall determine whether Scales still wishes to prosecute his appeal, and if so, the trial court shall make appropriate orders to ensure that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. A record of the hearing, including copies of all findings and
any orders, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than thirty days from the date of this opinion. See id. R. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records). It is so ordered on August 1 5 , 2024.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Abated and Remanded Filed: August 15, 2024 Do Not Publish