alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GENSTAR CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      24,215,542                 921,994
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,507                 114,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,311,204               1,045,663
<PP&E>                                       1,560,956                 726,489
<DEPRECIATION>                               (288,202)               (157,368)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,875,721               1,826,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          984,013                 597,952
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         88                      88
<COMMON>                                        22,288                  12,104
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,898,516               (917,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,875,721               1,826,913
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,133                  50,812
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,060,682               1,553,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               480,625                   8,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (51,961)               (348,890)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,558,885)             (1,842,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,558,885)             (1,842,345)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,558,885)             (1,842,345)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)                  (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)                  (0.20)


</TABLE>
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         HELPMATE ROBOTICS INC.

                                                               CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                                                        -------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Nine Months   Nine Months   Three Months   Three Months        
                                                            Ended         Ended         Ended          Ended          
Primary Earnings per Share                                09/30/96      09/30/95      09/30/96       09/30/95
                                                        ------------------------------------------------------- 
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>            <C>            <C> 
Historical                                  
                                  
Net Loss                                                $(2,808,238)   $(1,928,781)   $(1,167,810)   $(571,309)     
                                      
Preferred Dividends                                         (57,147)      (584,415)             -     (203,319)      
                                                        -------------  ------------   -----------    ---------
                                  
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders              $(2,865,385)   $(2,513,196)   $(1,167,810)   $(774,358)          
                                                        ------------   ------------   -----------    ---------
                                                        ------------   ------------   -----------    ---------
                              
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                5,827,168      1,583,853      6,335,205    1,586,729      
                                  
Incremental Shares Issuable Pursuant to SAB Topic 4D         38,553         38,553         38,553       38,553         
                                                        -----------    -----------     ----------    ---------

Total Shares                                              5,865,721      1,619,406      6,373,758    1,625,282
                                                        -----------    -----------      ---------    ---------
                                                        -----------    -----------      ---------    ---------
                
Historical Net Loss per Common Share                          $(.49)        $(1.55)         $(.18)       $(.48)  
                                                        -----------    -----------      ---------    ---------
                                                        -----------    -----------      ---------    ---------

</TABLE>
# Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) (9/2020) Standard Document(67.21 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) Overview(283.75 KB)

Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) CPPE(24.5 KB)

Spoil Disposal (Ac.) (572) Network Effects Diagram(78.77 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, P. Thomas Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/    P. THOMAS JENKINSP. Thomas Jenkins Chief Executive Officer




Dated: May 6, 2005
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2149 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require inclusion of the 

taxpayer’s social security number to claim the refundable portion of 

the child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

inclusion of the taxpayer’s social security number to 

claim the refundable portion of the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refundable Child Tax 

5 Credit Eligibility Verification Reform Act of 2017’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2149 IH

1 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED TO CLAIM 

2 THE REFUNDABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD 

3 TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(6) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

9 not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year 

10 unless the taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s so11 cial security number on the return of tax for 

12 such taxable year. 

13 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a 

14 joint return, the requirement of subparagraph 

15 (A) shall be treated as met if the social security 

16 number of either spouse is included on such re17 turn. 

18 ‘‘(C) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.—For 

19 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘social se20 curity number’ means a social security number 

21 issued to an individual by the Social Security 

22 Administration (other than a social security 

23 number issued pursuant to subclause (II) (or 

24 that portion of subclause (III) that relates to 

25 subclause (II)) of section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the 

26 Social Security Act).’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2149 IH

1 (b) OMISSIONS TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

2 CLERICAL ERROR.—Section 6213(g)(2)(I) of such Code 

3 is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(I) an omission of a correct social secu5 rity number required under section 24(d)(6) 

6 (relating to refundable portion of child tax cred7 it), or a correct TIN required under section 

8 24(e) (relating to child tax credit), to be in9 cluded on a return,’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Michael Tate, Vice President Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ MICHAEL TATEMichael Tate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 14, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
(4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0170; Directorate Ideotifier 2009-NM-I27-AD; Ameodme I'A.z.~$ /2--07

39_*'t;*<*; AD 2010-/*-**1

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo

EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes; and EMBRAER Model

EMB-145, -I 45ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list~

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAT) DAn:

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe ROUTIN<HYMOOL

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Reassessment of the damage tolerance analysis resulted in threshold

reduction for some Structure Significant Items (SSn of the Maintenance

Review Board Report (MRBR) Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI).

Failure to inspect these structural components, according to the new

threshold, could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracking. These

cracks, if not properly addressed, could adversely affect the structural

integrity of the airplane.

INI'rIAI-SiSJ(;

OOllml(; SYwJlOl

* * * * * * *
# C_2004228EN.01001201.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-119/03: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 2000/52/EC - Transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings)

(2004/C 228/22)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-119/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Rozet) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and C. Lemaire) — application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings or, in any event by failing to notify them to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur) and R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004 in which it:

| 1) | declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1)

declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2) | orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2377

JUNE BRYANT-BUNCH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

SHERIFF WANDIE VINCENT; DETECTIVE REED; DEPUTY

PARKER; DEPUTY JANE DOE; MAGISTRATE SHEARN;

BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; LAWRENCE

SOLOMON; NEAL VAUGHAN; Lt. C. A. COLEMAN; Lt.

POWELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ARCHER;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORRECTIONAL

OFFICER PHILLIPS, all in their official and

individual capacities,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (CA-05-34-2)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

June Bryant-Bunch, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Vaughan, Woodland,

North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, James Philip Allen, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

June Bryant-Bunch seeks to appeal the district court’s

denial of her motion for a temporary restraining order. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Bryant-Bunch seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. American Fed'n of

Gov't Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-05 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon,

482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir. 1973). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
  connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the Company)
  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Eric J. Sandman,
  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February
14, 2006

| |                               | 
| | ----------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Eric J.
  Sandman         | 
| |                               | 
| | Eric J.
  Sandman             | 
| | Principal
  Financial Officer | 

---
# C_2004239EN.01001601.xml

| 25.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 30 June 2004

in Case T-317/01: M+M Gesellschaft für Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for verbal mark ‘M+M EUROdATA’ - Earlier verbal mark EURODATA TV - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2004/C 239/32)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-317/01: M+M Gesellschaft für Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH, established in Frankfurt am Main (Germany), represented by M. Treis, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: S. Laitinen and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Mediametrie SA, established in Paris (France), represented originally by D. Dupuis-Latour and then by S. Szilvasi, lawyers — action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 October 2001 in Case R 698/2000-1 concerning opposition proceedings between Mediametrie SA and M+M Gesellschaft für Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 October 2001 in Case R 698/2000-1, save in so far as it referred the case back to the Opposition Division for the latter to act on the application for a trade mark in respect of the goods and services covered by that application and falling within Classes 9, 16 and 42; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 October 2001 in Case R 698/2000-1, save in so far as it referred the case back to the Opposition Division for the latter to act on the application for a trade mark in respect of the goods and services covered by that application and falling within Classes 9, 16 and 42;

| 2. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the applicant's costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the applicant's costs;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56 of 2.3.2002.

1

---