alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH FINANCIAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,326,705
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,804,803
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 86,700,421
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    314,736,912
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,082,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             430,238,265
<DEPOSITS>                                 172,936,839
<SHORT-TERM>                                60,875,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,956,947
<LONG-TERM>                                158,391,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,394,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             430,238,265
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,417,608
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,873,730
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                88,013
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,379,351
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,724,862
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,779,033
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,600,318
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (171,539)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,338,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,211,879
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   892,636
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.46
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,713,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,713,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,956,744
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  176,709
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,190
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,082,225
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR
15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John F. Stapleton, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.2  to the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of El Capitan Precious
Metals, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Date: March 6, 2015 | /s/ John F. Stapleton   
|------------------- | ------------------------
|                    | John F. Stapleton       
|                    | Chief Financial  Officer
# C_2004147EN.01000301.xml

| 2.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3446-UNIQA / Mannheimer)

(2004/C 147/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 25.05.2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking UNIQA Versicherungen AG, Austria (‘UNIQA’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Mannheimer AG Holding, Germany (‘MAG’) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 25.05.2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking UNIQA Versicherungen AG, Austria (‘UNIQA’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Mannheimer AG Holding, Germany (‘MAG’) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | UNIQA: Insurances |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

UNIQA: Insurances

| — | MAG: Insurances |
| --- | --- |

—

MAG: Insurances

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified concentration could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified concentration could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax no. +32/2/2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3446-Uniqa / Mannheimer, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax no. +32/2/2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3446-Uniqa / Mannheimer, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

1

---
# L_2015256EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1745

of 30 September 2015

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Hollandse maatjesharing/Hollandse Nieuwe/Holländischer Matjes (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Hollandse maatjesharing’/‘Hollandse Nieuwe’/‘Holländischer Matjes’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. — Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2015.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 156, 12.5.2015, p. 19.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 99.4
                                                           For Immediate Release

Media Contact
Libby Barland
Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
38345 West 10 Mile Road, Suite 100
Farmington Hills, MI  48335
561-237-2243
http://www.childtime.com

CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERS REPORTS THAT THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES
WOULD BE DELISTED ABSENT APPEAL

FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, September 9, 2002 -- Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
(NASDAQ: CTIM), today announced that it had received notice of the determination
by the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department that, absent an appeal by the
Company, the Company's securities would be delisted from The Nasdaq National
Market System on September 13, 2002, because of the failure to maintain market
value of publicly held shares of $5,000,000, as required for continued inclusion
by Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(2). The Company intends to appeal the Staff
determination. During the pendency of the appeal process, the Company's
securities will remain listed on The Nasdaq National Market System. If the
Company determines that its appeal will not be successful, it will apply to
transfer the listing of its securities to The Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Although
there are no assurances that a transfer application to The Nasdaq SmallCap
Market, if necessary, would be approved, the Company believes that it meets the
applicable standards for inclusion in that market.

Childtime Learning Centers, Inc., of Farmington Hills, MI acquired Tutor Time
Learning Systems, Inc. on July 19, 2002 and is now the nation's third largest
publicly traded child care provider with operations in 30 states, the District
of Columbia and internationally. Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. has over 7,500
employees and provides education and care for over 50,000 children daily in over
450 corporate and franchise centers nationwide.
#### Cavanaugh, Respondent, vs. Boyle and another, Appellants: Rundell and others, Defendants.

For the appellants: *Hannan, Johnson ■& Goldschmidt,*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Vilas H. Whaley*of Racine, and *Elton S. Karrmann*of Platteville, of counsel.

For the respondent: *Kopp & Brunckhorst*of Platteville.

For the defendants Rundell and Milwaukee Automobile Insurance Company: *Otto F. Christenson*of Lancaster.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
----

NOTICE TO CANDIDATES WITH ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO THIS TEXT

(2004/C 138 A/02)

ONLY THE APPLICATION FORM AND OPTICAL READER FORM ENCLOSED IN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL PRINTED BY THE OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES WILL BE REGARDED AS ORIGINALS. FOR THIS REASON, PHOTOCOPIES OR ANY OTHER COPY OF THESE DOCUMENTS (OBTAINED ELECTRONICALLY, FOR INSTANCE) WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

TO OBTAIN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL PLEASE APPLY, BEFORE 4 JUNE 2004, TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ADDRESSES:

QUOTING THE REFERENCE ‘SELECTION PROCEDURE PE/81/S’, THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH YOU WISH TO RECEIVE THE DOCUMENTATION AND THE ADDRESS TO WHICH IT SHOULD BE SENT.

----
# C_2004262EN.01002401.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/24

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Retten i Hørsholm (Denmark) by order of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Anklagemyndigheden against Steffen Ryborg

(Case C-279/04)

(2004/C 262/43)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by the Retten i Hørsholm (Denmark), by order of 4 June 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 28 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Anklagemyndigheden against Steffen Ryborg.

The Retten i Hørsholm asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following questions:

| 1.a. | Are Article 39 EC, Article 49 EC and Article 10 EC to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from requiring registration of a motor vehicle when the vehicle belongs to an employer established in a neighbouring Member State and is used by an employee who is resident in the first-mentioned Member State for work purposes and during his free time in both Member States? |
| --- | --- |

1.a.

Are Article 39 EC, Article 49 EC and Article 10 EC to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from requiring registration of a motor vehicle when the vehicle belongs to an employer established in a neighbouring Member State and is used by an employee who is resident in the first-mentioned Member State for work purposes and during his free time in both Member States?

| 1.b | If in the assessment for question 1.a weight is to be accorded to whether any private use of the vehicle is ancillary to business use, which criteria should be used by the national court in determining whether the non-business use of the vehicle is ancillary to the business use, when it can be assumed that the vehicle is used for business purposes, see Case C-127/86 Yves Ledoux [1988] ECR 3741, paragraph 18? |
| --- | --- |

1.b

If in the assessment for question 1.a weight is to be accorded to whether any private use of the vehicle is ancillary to business use, which criteria should be used by the national court in determining whether the non-business use of the vehicle is ancillary to the business use, when it can be assumed that the vehicle is used for business purposes, see Case C-127/86 Yves Ledoux [1988] ECR 3741, paragraph 18?

---
# Explore New Mexico in the Interactive Map

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Explore New Mexico in the Interactive Map 

The Interactive Map Conditions Interface allows users to display current and historical snow water equivalent, snow depth, precipitation, reservoir storage, and streamflow data collected by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and other monitoring agencies.

----

##   Interactive Map- New Mexico Station Inventory

New Mexico Interactive Map
NRCS Water and Climate Center Interactive Map, New Mexico
Exhibit 10.7



FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT



FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (First Amendment) is entered into as of June 27, 2005,
by and between CORAUTUS GENETICS INC., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (BSC) (each a Party and collectively the
Parties).



WHEREAS, the Parties
entered into a Distribution Agreement dated as of July 30, 2003, (the Distribution Agreement), pursuant to which the Parties entered into an exclusive distributorship with respect to Final Products (as defined in the Distribution
Agreement);



WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into an
Investment Agreement dated as of June 27, 2005 (the Second Investment Agreement), pursuant to which BSC has agreed to purchase certain capital stock of the Company;



WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify the Sales Price (as defined in the Distribution Agreement), and the
execution and delivery of this First Amendment is a condition precedent to the closing of the Second Investment Agreement; and



WHEREAS, capitalized terms that are not defined in this First Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Distribution
Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises and the mutual representations and warranties, agreements and covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereby agree as follows:



1. The first clause of the definition of Sales Price set forth in Exhibit A of the Distribution Agreement shall be deleted and
replaced with the following:



Sales
Price shall mean the price to be paid by BSC to the Company for a Final Product and shall be ***, calculated by reference to the following terms and conditions:



2. All provisions of the Distribution Agreement as specifically amended by this First Amendment are hereby in all respects
ratified and confirmed.



3. This First Amendment may be signed
in one or more counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same First Amendment.



---

|*** | indicates redacted confidential information pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
|----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed by their
respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.



CORAUTUS GENETICS INC.By:

/s/ Richard E. OttoRichard E. Otto President and Chief Executive
OfficerBOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Lawrence C. BestLawrence C. Best Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control, Brush Management, Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment, Prescribed Burning, Prescribed Grazing, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Watering Facility.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/3402 — SIEMENS/3i/AGUTH/XTRAMIND)

(2004/C 214/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
# C_2015131EN.01000201.xml

| 23.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 21 April 2015

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 accompanying the Proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020

(2015/C 131/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2015 was definitively adopted on 17 December 2014 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2015 was definitively adopted on 17 December 2014 (2),

2

| — | on 20 January 2015, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2015 accompanying the Proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 20 January 2015, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2015 accompanying the Proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 accompanying the Proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 was adopted on 21 April 2015.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, 21 April 2015.

For the Council

The President

Edgars RINKĒVIČS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 69, 13.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---