alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# An International Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) Expert Elicitation Exercise for High Energy Arcing Faults (HEAFs) (NUREG-2218)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2218 (PDF – 12.9 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2017**Date Published:** January 2018

**Prepared by:**K. Hamburger

Kenneth Hamburger, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the results of a phenomena identification and ranking table (PIRT) exercise performed for nuclear power plant (NPP) high energy arc fault (HEAF) analysis applications conducted on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.

The PIRT exercise was performed via a facilitated expert elicitation process. In this case, the expert panel comprised six international HEAF experts. The panel was facilitated by NRC staff. The objective of a PIRT exercise is to identify key phenomena associated with the intended application and to then rank the current state of knowledge relative to each identified phenomenon. The expert panel was presented with a series of specific HEAF scenarios, each of which is based on the types of scenarios typically considered in NPP applications. Each scenario includes a figure of merit (i.e., a specific goal to be achieved in analyzing the scenario using HEAF analysis or modeling tools). Given each scenario, the panel identified phenomena that are of potential interest to an assessment based on the figure of merit. The identified phenomena are then ranked relative to their importance in predicting the figure of merit. Each phenomenon is then further ranked for the existing state of knowledge and the adequacy of existing modeling tools to predict that phenomenon.

The PIRT panel covered three HEAF scenarios and identified a number of areas potentially in need of further analysis and model development. This report discusses the results in detail.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of New Life
      Scientific, Inc. for the Year Ended December 31, 2007, I, Richard Amy, Chief
      Executive Officer and Henry Val, Chief Financial Officer of New Life Scientific,
      Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and
      belief, that:





1.
             Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
             The information contained in such Yearly
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of




**APPLIED
      WELLNESS CORPORATION**





Dated:
      April 8     , 2008





**APPLIED
      WELLNESS CORPORATION**





By:
            */s/
                Dr Richard Amy*


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Office





**APPLIED
      WELLNESS CORPORATION**





By:
            */Henry
                Val*


Chief
      Financial Office
JURISDICTION UNDER

SUBSIDIARY                                           WHICH STATE ORGANIZED

Superior Insurance Group Management, Inc.                     Delaware
Superior Insurance Group, Inc.                                Delaware

                       Superior Insurance Company Florida

Superior American Insurance Company                  Florida
Superior Guaranty Insurance Company                  Florida
Pafco General Insurance Company                               Indiana
IGF Insurance Company                                         Indiana
IGF Holdings, Inc.                                                     Indiana
North American Crop Underwriters, Inc.                        Minnesota




This schedule does not include other subsidiaries,  which, in the aggregate,  do
not  constitute a significant  subsidiary  of the  Registrant as of December 31,
1999.

--------
1 CERC is a trademark of CVision Corp.
# Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) (7/2022) Standard Document(98.41 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) Overview(675.45 KB)

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) CPPE(24.51 KB)

Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (No.) (457) Network Diagram(83.32 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2017

Start

Large percentage of ground surface 

covered with organic material (with 

percent coverage determined by purpose 

of practice); anchoring material or tools

used as needed

D.2 (+) Infiltration

C.2 (+) Water quality and aquatic habitats

I.5 (-) Sheet and

rill erosion

D.5 (-) Evaporation D.6 (+/-) Soil

temperature

D.7 (+) Soil

organic matter 

D.1 (-) Soil

splash erosion D.4 (-) Weeds

I.9 (+) Soil moisture

I.4 (-) Runoff

C.4 (+) Air

quality in the

airshed

C.3 (+) Water quantity

available for other uses C.1 (+/-) Income

and income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.14 (+) Plant

growth,

establishment, or 

crop production 

(quantity, quality, 

harvest timing)

Initial setting: On cropland or disturbed 

land where there is a need to control 

weeds, conserve soil moisture, moderate 

soil temperature, or reduce erosion using 

organic materials as mulch

I.1 (-) Downslope

sediment

deposition 

D.3 (+) Cost

of installation

and 

maintenance

I.13 (+) Length

of growing

season

I. 8 (-)

Potential

for 

herbicide 

movement 

offsite I.11 (-)

Input/energy 

consumption

I.16 (+) Soil quality

I.17 (+) Carbon

sequestration

I.15 (+)

Potential

income

I.2 (-)

Maintenance 

costs for 

sediment 

removal

Mulching (484)

I.3 (+)

Preservation of 

infrastructure;

(-) community 

costs

I.7 (-)

Herbicide 

use 

I.12 (+/-)

Net returns

Irrigation Water 

Management (449)

I.10 (-) Irrigation

water

I.18 (-) Particulate

matter

D.8 (-) Wind

erosion

I.6 (-)

Labor

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Pathway

Critical Area Planting (342)

Diversion (362)

Tree/Shrub Establishment 

(612)
# Events

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 

# Filter Events by:

### Wisconsin State Technical Committee Meeting - April 2024

The Natural Resources Conservation Service in Wisconsin will host a hybrid (in-person with Microsoft Teams video conference option) State Technical Committee Meeting on Thursday April 18, 2024 at the USDA-NRCS State Office in Madison, Wisconsin.

WisconsinAirAnimalsClimateEnergyLandPlantsSoilWaterWildlife HabitatCroplandsEasementsForestryInsects and PollinatorsOrganic AgricultureRange & PastureSoil HealthTreesUrban AgricultureWetlandsWildlifeConservation Stewardship ProgramEnvironmental Quality Incentives ProgramRegional Conservation Partnership Program

### Women & Soil

Women, Land and Legacy and other partners are hosting "Women & Soil" at the Field of Dreams Movie Site, Field of Dreams Event Center, in Dyersville, Iowa, on June 8th, from 1pm to 5pm. Cost for the event is $15 in-person or $10 to tune in virtually. 

IowaClimateLandSoilCroplandsSoil Health
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Solely for the purposesof complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and ChiefExecutive Officer of AML Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, that:**

** **

•                                  the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

•                                  the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 15, 2004              |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Jacob Inbar                  |   |
| Jacob Inbar,                          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
***SILVERSTAR        HOLDINGS LTD - 10-Q***

----

****

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In        connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. (the        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,        Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:        February 14, 2008

     /s/Clive        Kabatznik     

|   | Clive Kabatznik |
|--------|-----------------|

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

[A        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to        Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. and furnished        to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Generic Communications

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - ADAMS - Generic Letters
                  - ADAMS - Administrative Letters
                  - ADAMS - Information Notices
                  - ADAMS - Regulatory Issue Summaries
                  - ADAMS - Bulletins
                  - ADAMS - Circulars
                  - Main Site

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Generic Communications

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of STARMED GROUP, INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Herman Rappaport, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Herman Rappaport
--------------------------
Herman Rappaport
President, CEO and CFO
June 29, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. J. D. MULLINS, Jr., and Emily J. Mullins, Appellants.

No. 9822.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1965.

Decided April 14, 1965.

H. Clyde Pearson, Roanoke Va. (Hopkins, Pearson & Engleby, Roanoke, Va., on brief), for appellants.

H. Garnett Scott, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Summary judgment was entered in this case upon a state of facts assumed to be uncontroverted. It appears, however, that the pleadings and the record do not contain the documents which might possibly supply a basis for the assumption, nor was any testimony taken and there is no agreement between the parties upon the facts so assumed. In the circumstances we think the case should be remanded for a full inquiry. Summary judgment was inappropriate. Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.

The judgment will be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Vacated and remanded.
CONCLUSION 

As set forth herein, BRIAN MORSON seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 

§ 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA), 

which will permit safe operation of the DJI PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL UAS 

commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting 

aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this 

Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by 

allowing BRIAN MORSON to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI 

PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL and DJ UASs commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, BRIAN MORSON respectfully 

requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements 

of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.15l(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 

91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI 

PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial 

video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 

Dated: July 27, 2015 

Page 34 of 35 

Respectfully submitted, 

BRIAN MORSON
#### STATE v. ISAAC H. SMITH.

*Indictment*— Forgery *—Evidence—Testimony of Soliei'or.*

1. On the trial of an indictment for forgery, charging the defendant with having forged an order for $60.07, evidence that the defendant had forged an order for *any other amount,*is not admissible.

2. It is error to permit the Solicitor for the State to testify in a criminal trial without being sworn.

IndictmeNt for Forgery tried at Spring Term, 1877, of Craven Superior Court, before *Moore, J.*

No statémenfc of the facts is necessary to an understanding of the opinion of this Court as delivered by Mr. Justice *463Reade. Verdict of Guilty. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*Mr. M. DeW. Stevenson,*for the defendant.

Reade, J.

The indictment charges the defendant' with having forged an order for sixty dollars and seven cents. There was no evidence tending to show that he had forged an order for that amount, and of course he ought not to have been convicted.

The only evidence introduced related to two orders, — one for sixty dollars, and the other for sixty dollars and twenty seven cents.

"Whether these discrepancies between the charge and the proof really appeared on the trial, or whether they are the result of a careless record, we do not know. We are bound by the record.

One of the witnesses for the State, the Solicitor, was permitted to testify for the State without being sworn, the defendant objecting. This was error.-

Error.

Per Curiam. *Venire de novo.*
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

N O

. A P

– 7 6

, 8 7 1

E X P A R T E R A U L P A R R A

, A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

C A U S E N O

. 2 0 0 6 0 D 0 3 3 6 0 I N T H E 4 0 9 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M E L P A S O C O U N T Y

M E Y E R S

, J

. , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n

.

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

C o d e o f C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e A r t i c l e 3 6

. 2 7 p r o v i d e s t h a t w h e n t h e t r i a l c o u r t

r e c e i v e s a n o t e f

r o m t h e j u r y

, h e s h o u l d f i r s t s u b m i t t h e q u e s t i o n a n d h i s a n s w e r t o t h e

d e f e n d a n t o r h i s c o u n s e l b e f o r e g i v i n g t h e a n s w e r t o t h e j u r y

. H e r e

, t h e t r i a l j u d g e

r e c e i v e d a n o t e t h a t t w o o f t h e j u r o r s w e r e t h r e a t e n i n g t o w a l k o u t o f t h e d e l i b e r a t i o n s a n d

t h e y w a n t e d t o k n o w t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f d o i n g s o

. T h e j u d g e g a t h e r e d t h e j u r y

, t h e

d e f e n d a n t

, d e f

e n s e c o u n s e l

, a n d t h e p r o s e c u t o r i n t h e c o u r t r o o m a n d i n f o r m e d t h e m t h a tParra dissent–Page 2

a n y j u r o r s w h o w a l k e d o u t o n d e l i b e r a t i o n s w o u l d b e p u t i n t h e c o u n t y j a i l a n d r e t u r n e d t o

t h e j u r y t h e n e x t d a y t o c o n t i n u e t o d e l i b e r a t e

. A p p l i c a n t ’ s c o u n s e l d i d n o t o b j e c t t o t h e

t r i a l c o u r t ’ s f

a i l u r e t o c o m p l y w i t h A r t i c l e 3 6

. 2 7 a n d d i d n o t o b j e c t t o t h e j u d g e ’ s

i n s t r u c t i o n t o t h e j u r y

. T h e j u r y d e c i d e d t o c o n t i n u e d e l i b e r a t i n g a n d

, w i t h i n l e s s t h a n 3 0

m i n u t e s

, r e t u r n e d a v e r d i c t a s s e s s i n g a l i f e s e n t e n c e

.

T h e j u d g e ’ s a c t i o n s i n t h r e a t e n i n g t o p u t j u r o r s i n j a i l a n d i n f a i l i n g t o i n f

o r m

c o u n s e l t h a t t h i s w o u l d b e h i s r e s p o n s e t o t h e j u r y ’ s q u e s t i o n s w e r e e r r o r a n d t h e r e i s n o

r e a s o n a b l e s t r a t e g y t o e x p l a i n c o u n s e l ’ s f a i l u r e t o o b

j e c t t o t h e s e e r r o r s

. T h e d e f i c i e n c i e s

i n c o u n s e l ’ s p e r f

o r m a n c e d e p r i v e d A p p l i c a n t o f a f a i r a n d i m p a r t i a l j u r y a n d l i k e l y

a f f e c t e d t h e j u d g m e n t a g a i n s t h i m

. I w o u l d h o l d t h a t A p p l i c a n t r e c e i v e d i n e f f e c t i v e

a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l a n d w o u l d g r a n t r e l i e f

.

F i l e d : S e p t e m b e r 1 8

, 2 0 1 3

P u b l i s h
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S. Mark I Boiling Water Reactor (NUREG-2161)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2161 (PDF - 14.20 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2013**Date Published:**September 2014

**Prepared by:**Andrew Barto, Y. James Chang, Keith Compton,Hossein Esmaili, Donald Helton, Andrew Murphy,Andrew Nosek, Jose Pires, Fred Schofer, andBrian Wagner

Donald Algama, NRC Project ManagerKatie Wagner, Former NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission performed this consequence study to continue its examination of the risks and consequences of postulated spent fuel pool accidents. The study provides publicly available consequence estimates of a hypothetical spent fuel pool accident initiated by a low likelihood seismic event at a specific reference plant. The study compares high-density and low-density loading conditions and assesses the benefits of post 9/11 mitigation measures. Past risk studies have shown that storage of spent fuel in a high-density configuration is safe and risk of a large release due to an accident is very low. This study’s results are consistent with earlier research conclusions that spent fuel pools are robust structures that are likely to withstand severe earthquakes without leaking. The NRC continues to believe, based on this study and previous studies that high density storage of spent fuel in pools protects public health and safety. The study’s results will inform a broader regulatory analysis of the spent fuel pools at U.S. nuclear reactors as part of the Japan Lessons-learned Tier 3 plan.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021