alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Soil Education

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Soil Education 

Soil-related educational resources for students.

**Sign up for email updates on Soil Education and Training**

**Soil and Plant Science YouTube channel**

Soil Facts
Definitions of soil and soil survey, information on careers, some basics on soil formation and classification, and a soil science glossary.

Lesson Plans
Soil-related lesson plans.

State Soils
A state soil is a soil that has special significance to a particular state. Each state in the United States has selected a state soil, twenty of which have been legislatively established. 

The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy
Descriptions and distribution maps of the twelve soil orders.

Soil Colors of the United States
Maps that show soil color at various depths for individual States and the Continental United States.

Soil Texture Calculator
Learn how to calculate a single point texture class based on percent sand, silt, and clay. Including the optional sand fractions will refine the calculation.

Soil Quotations
Soil-related quotes.

Soils Planners
Download or order the 2024 Soils Planner.

Understanding Soil Risks and Hazards
Using Soil Survey to Identify Areas With Risks and Hazards to Human Life and Property

Urban Soils
According to the 2010 U.S. Census, 81 percent of the nation’s population lives in urban areas. This fact alone is enough to justify the need to identify, describe, and map urban soils to modern standards.

Soil Health Education and Outreach
Lesson plans, educator guides, soil quality test kits, soil health posters, and other educational resources about soil health. 

##   From the Surface Down

An introduction to soil surveys for agronomic use.

From the Surface Down(4 MB)

##   Collegiate Soil Judging

A reference training document developed for the Southeastern Region Collegiate Soil Judging Contests. The Handbook contains general rules for managing and preparing regional contests, duties of the host school and competing schools, pit construction, scoring, and more. The Handbook serves as a reference for other regional and national competitions.

Handbook for Collegiate Soils Contests(116.85 KB)

##   Other Links

###   Science of Agriculture

Short animations, interactives and videos teach math & science concepts crucial to the study of agriculture.

Visit Site

###   Dig It! The Secrets of Soil

From the Smithsonian National Museum.

Visit Site

###   Soil Science Society of America

K-12 soil science teacher resources.

Visit Site

##   Contact Soils

Please contact us if you see something that needs to be updated, if you have any questions, or if you need accessibility assistance.
                  -    Soils Webmaster 
                  -    402-437-5499 
                  -    Soils-Webmaster@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
National Source Tracking System (NSTS)

Radioactive 

Material

Category 1 

(TBq)

Category 1 

(Ci)

Category 2 

(TBq)

Category 2 

(Ci)

Actinium-227 20 540 0.2 5.4

Americium-241 60 1,600 0.6 16

Americium-241/Be 60 1,600 0.6 16

Californium-252 20 540 0.2 5.4

Cobalt-60 30 810 0.3 8.1

Curium-244 50 1,400 0.5 14

Cesium-137 100 2,700 1 27

Gadolinium-153 1,000 27,000 10 270

Iridium-192 80 2,200 0.8 22

Plutonium-238 60 1,600 0.6 16

Plutonium-239/Be 60 1,600 0.6 16

Polonium-210 60 1,600 0.6 16

Promethium-147 40,000 1,100,000 400 11,000

Radium-226 40 1,100 0.4 11

Selenium-75 200 5,400 2 54

Strontium-90 1,000 27,000 10 270

Thorium-228 20 540 0.2 5.4

Thorium-229 20 540 0.2 5.4

Thulium-170 20,000 540,000 200 5,400

Ytterbium-169 300 8,100 3 81

Nationally Tracked Sources

Appendix E to Part
### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T D e c e m be r 16, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12669 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 2 - 0 8 0 2 4 - T P - D MM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R O B E R T C O L G I N W I L S O N , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 16, 2005) B efo re D U B IN A , H U L L an dH IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es.2

P E R C U R I A M: R ob i n F arnsw orth, appo i nt ed coun se l for R ob ertC ol gi n W i l son i n thi s di re ct c r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the ap p e lla n t a n df

ile dab r ie f

p u r s u a n t to A n d e r s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S .C t. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L .E d .2 d4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd W i l s on’ s r e voc a t i on a nd se nt ence ar e AF F I RME D.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING REFORM AND
INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eloquent, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. John Curson,
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and                                                                                                                     
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the
end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by the Report.

|                      |  |     |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/ R. John Curson                    
|                      |  |     |  |                                       
|                      |  |     |  | R. John
Curson
Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject – FY 2018

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, October 21, 2021
#### Steenis and others, Appellants, vs. City of Appleton, Respondent.

*February 6*

March *7, 1939.*

*532The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Sarto Balliet*of Appleton, and for the respondent on that of *Harry P. Hoeffel*of Appleton.

Rosenberry, C. J.

A number of questions are raised upon the appeal. Plaintiffs contend that they have a right to show the true consideration for the conveyance; that the consideration was in fact an agreement to remove, restore, and maintain the log cabin as alleged in the complaint. We are unable to find in the complaint any allegation to the effect that the city of Appleton ever executed a contract in manner and form as required by law. The allegation of the complaint is that the city of Appleton approved the agreement dated September 20, 1935. The only agreement executed on September 20, 1935, is the quitclaim deed hereinbefore set out. It is nowhere alleged that the agreement between the plaintiffs and the agents of the city of Appleton respecting relocation of the cabin as an historical landmark was ever presented to the council and approved by it and its officers authorized to execute it. However, if it should be held that the contract is duly executed, pursuant to authority legally conferred upon the officers, the plaintiffs still may not recover. It is apparent that the consideration for the transfer of the cabin in question was the agreement of the city to' restore, keep, and maintain the cabin as an historical landmark. The title to the property was conveyed to the city absolutely without condition or reverter. The transactions as set out in the complaint undoubtedly created a charitable trust if validly executed. Restatement, Trusts, § 348, defines a charitable trust as follows:

> “A charitable trust is a fiduciary relationship with respect to property arising as a result of a manifestation of an intention to create it, and subjecting the person by whom the *533property is held to equitable duties to deal with the property for a charitable purpose.”

The maintenance of a cabin as an historical landmark was no doubt intended to accomplish a benefit to the community at large. This is a charitable purpose. See Restatement, Trusts, §§ 368, 374.

Sec. 391, comment *e,*is as follows:

> “A suit for the enforcement of a charitable trust cannot be maintained by the settlor or his heirs or personal representatives as such.”

Sec. 392 provides:

> “The remedies for the failure' of the trustees of a charitable trust to perform their duties under the trust are exclusively equitable.”

■ There being no express provision for reverter, in the event of the failure of the trust, which is given for a public purpose, none can be implied. *Maxcy v. Oshkosh*(1910), 144 Wis. 238, 128 N. W. 899, 128 N. W. 1138. It is apparent that the plaintiffs cannot maintain an action for a money judgment under the facts alleged in the complaint.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)

In connection with Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report of StarMed Group, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Herman Rappaport, Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Herman Rappaport
--------------------
Herman Rappaport
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

September 30, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to StarMed Group, Inc. and will be retained by StarMed Group, Inc. and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
# Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard and supporting documents for Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) (5/19) Standard Document(83.96 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) Overview(348.51 KB)

Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) CPPE(24.26 KB)

Combustion System Improvement (No.) (372) ND(58.26 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
such officer’s knowledge, that:





This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      April 28, 2009
              /s/ Steven C. StrausSteven
      C. StrausChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      April 28, 2009
              /s/ Michael J.
CelebrezzeMichael
      J. CelebrezzeSenior
      Vice President of Finance,Chief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2



                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Dennerlein, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Globix
          Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2002;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this report; and

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this report, fairly present in all material
          respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
          of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
          report.

                                        Globix Corporation


Date: September 8, 2003                 /s/ Robert Dennerlein
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert Dennerlein
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      10.17


**SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO THE**


**TIB
      BANK OF THE KEYS**


**SALARY
      CONTINUATION AGREEMENT**





THIS
      SECOND AMENDMENT executed on this ________ day of __________________, 2006,
      by
      and between the TIB BANK OF THE KEYS, a Florida banking corporation located
      in
      Key Largo, Florida (the “Company”), and __________________ (the
“Executive”).




On
      __________________, the Company and the Executive executed the TIB BANK OF
      THE
      KEYS SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”).





The
      undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purpose of 1)
      changing the percentage of the Benefit Basis for purposes of determining the
      Normal Retirement Benefit and Change of Control Benefit, and 2) changing the
      discount rate used in calculating the accrual balance from a fixed rate to
      a
      rate that can change periodically in accordance with Generally Accepted
      Accounting Principles .
      Therefore ,





***Section
      2.1.1 of the Agreement shall be added to the Agreement as
      follows:***





*2.1.1
      Amount of Benefit* .
      The
      annual benefit under this Section 2.1 is an amount equal to forty three percent
      (43.0%) of the Benefit Basis.





***Section
      2.4.1 of the Agreement shall be added to the Agreement as
      follows:***





*2.4.1
      Amount of Benefit* .
      The
      annual benefit under this Section 2.4 is an amount equal to forty three percent
      (43.0%) of Inflated Compensation.





***EXHIBIT
      I of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace any reference to a fixed
      discount rate to now be at a rate determined periodically to be in conformity
      to
      Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.***





Except
      as
      amended herein by this Second Amendment, the Agreement and the First Amendment
      remains in full force and effect.





**IN
      WITNESS OF THE ABOVE** ,
      the
      Executive and the Company have agreed to this Second Amendment.






**EXECUTIVE:**
            
            
            **COMPANY:**
              ****TIB
                BANK OF THE KEYS****
              ****ByIts
The 

Nuclear Regulator

Commission

Annual Security Public Mee
Closing Remarks

Roy P. Zimmerman

Director

Office of Nuclear Security 

and Incident Response

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commiss
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Isreal Torrez, Also Known as Israel Torrez, Also Known as Isael Torrez, Appellant.

[771 NYS2d 909]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), *406imposed December 16, 2002, upon his conviction of rape in the second degree, the sentence being a term of 10 years’ probation and the issuance of an order of protection to remain in effect until December 16, 2007.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of rape in the second degree, a class D felony *(see*Penal Law § 130.30). On December 16, 2002, the County Court adjudicated him a youthful offender and sentenced him to a term of 10 years’ probation. The court also issued an order of protection, to remain in effect until December 16, 2007.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly imposed a 10-year term of probation, rather than a five-year term. The crime underlying his youthful offender adjudication was a “sexual assault” (Penal Law § 65.00 [3]). Penal Law § 60.02 (2) provides, in relevant part, that when a person is sentenced “upon a youthful offender finding which has been substituted for a conviction for any felony, the court must impose a sentence authorized to be imposed upon a person convicted of a class E felony.” The authorized period of probation for a person convicted of a class E felony, which is a sexual assault, is 10 years *(see*Penal Law § 65.00 [2], [3] [a] [iii]). Consequently, the mandatory term of probation for a youthful offender who pleads guilty or is found guilty of a sexual assault is 10 years, not five years, the authorized term for other E felonies *(see People v Andrew W.,*189 Misc 2d 479 [2001]).

The defendant also contends that the County Court should have directed that the order of protection run from the date of his plea rather than the date of his sentence. Contrary to the People’s contention, that issue may be reviewed on this appeal *(see People v Wheeler,*268 AD2d 448, 449 [2000]). However, the defendant’s contention is without merit *(see People v Battipaglia,*307 AD2d 783 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 617 [2003]; *People v Feliciano,*302 AD2d 474 [2003]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffStandard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants: Environmental Standard Rev

# StandardReview Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants: Environmental Standard Review Plan forOperating License Renewal (NUREG-1555, Supplement 1, Revision 1, Final Report)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        -  NUREG-1555, Supplement 1, Revision 1, Final Report (PDF - 1.60 MB)

For information about how the NRC handles your comments, see our Privacy Policy.

## Publication Information

*Environmental Standard Review Plans (ESRPs) are prepared for the guidance of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation staff responsible for environmental reviews for nuclear power plant. These documents are made available to the public as part of the Commission's policy to inform the nuclear industry and the general public of regulatory procedures and policies. ESRPs are not substitutes for regulatory guides or the Commission's regulations, and compliance with them is not required. The ESRPs are keyed to preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Stations.*

*Published ESRPs will be revised periodically, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information and experience. Comments and suggestions for improvement will be considered and should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Washington, DC 20555-0001.*

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2013**Date Published:**June 2013

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document provides guidance to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff in implementing the provisions in Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations*Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51), “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions” when conducting an environmental review for the renewal of a nuclear power plant operating license(s). This standard review plan guides the staff in preparing a plant-specific supplemental environmental impact statement to NUREG-1437, Revision 1, *Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear**Plants*. This document supplements NUREG-1555, *Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews**for Nuclear Power Plants*, which provides guidance for the environmental reviews of construction permits, initial operating licenses, early site permits, and combined licenses for new nuclear power plants. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021