alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vsource, Inc. (the registrant) for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report), I, David Hirschhorn, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the report.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: Sept 14, 2005



|    |  |                                                                    
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David Hirschhorn                                               
|    |  | David Hirschhorn                                                   
|    |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer                                         
|    |  | (Co-Principal Executive Officer and Co-Principal Financial Officer)



28
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Scott Kiefer, certify that:

 

1.                     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Channell CommercialCorporation;

 

2.                     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: March 18, 2005 |   | By:    | /s/ Scott Kiefer                |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   | Scott Kiefer                    |
|                 |   |   | Corporate Controller and        |
|                 |   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
ConservaƟon PracƟce Standard Overview 

October 2015 

An open channel is a natural or artificial 

channel in which water flows with a free 

surface. 

 

PracƟce InformaƟon 

Constructing, improving, or restoring an open 

channel can convey water required for flood 

prevention, drainage, wildlife habitat protection 

or enhancement, or other authorized water 

management purpose. 

This practice applies to the construction of 

open channels or modifications of existing 

streams or ditches with drainage areas 

exceeding one (1) mi2

 (1.6 km2) . 

Construction or modification of an open 

channel has the potential to impact water 

quality and quantity. It could also affect the 

fish and wildlife habitat in the stream and the 

adjoining riparian areas. In addition, both 

upstream and downstream channel reaches 

could change as a result of the construction or 

modification of a stream segment. Careful 

planning will reduce the potential effects of this 

work. 

This practice has a minimum expected life of 

15 years. Maintenance activities could include 

reconstruction of damaged areas and 

revegetation of eroded areas. 

Common Associated PracƟces 

Open Channel (582) is commonly applied with 

conservation practices such as Streambank 

and Shoreline Protection (580), Critical Area 

Planting (342), Clearing and Snagging (326), 

Channel Bed Stabilization (584), Riparian 

Forest Buffer (391), and Riparian Herbaceous 

Cover (390). 

For further information, contact your local 

NRCS field office. 

Open Channel (582) 

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003950
<NAME>                        PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                               11,617
<SECURITIES>                         15,008
<RECEIVABLES>                         5,844
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                           5,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     38,802
<PP&E>                                4,065
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       40,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 5,279
<BONDS>                                   3
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 75
<OTHER-SE>                           34,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         40,456
<SALES>                               8,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      8,113
<CGS>                                 3,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,461
<INCOME-TAX>                            861
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,600
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .21
        


</TABLE>
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM September 2020

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Initial setting: Provide protection to livestock from 

negative environmental factors. Need to facilitate 

prescribed grazing. There is a need to remove 

animals from sensitive areas by providing a source 

of shade or shelter that is located away from the 

existing shade or shelter in wooded areas and on 

stream banks or depressions. 

Start

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D.2 (+) Protect surface waters 

from nutrient and pathogen 

loading

D.1 (+) Protection from heat, 

wind, cold, or snow

D.3 (+) Protect 

wooded areas 

from erosion and 

nutrient deposition

D.4 (+) Improve 

grazing distribution

A permanent or portable structure to provide shelter for 

livestock from negative environmental factors

I.2 (+) Improved water 

quality

Livestock Shelter Structure (576)

C.1 (+) Income and income stability 

(individuals and community

C.2 (+) Health of humans, 

domestic animals, and 

wildlife

C.3 (+) Healthy waters 

and soil

I.3 (-) Food safety risk 

implications

I.4 (+) Increased 

soil stability and 

soil health I.6 (+) Enhance 

wildlife habitat

I.1 (+) Healthy, 

productive animals

I.5 (+) 

Reduce 

overused 

areas

Nutrient 

Management (590)

Fence (382)

Trails and Walkways 

(575)

Access Control (472)
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM Date Oct. 2020

Pasture and Hay Planting (512)

I.5 (+) Upland 

wildlife habitat

I.2 (+) Provide 

alternative forage 

crops for grazing or 

machine harvest

C.3 (+) Populations 

of wild animals, 

recreational 

opportunities 

I. 3 (+) Weed 

suppression

D.3 (+) 

Improved 

soil cover

Initial setting: Land suitable for 

production of annual, biennial or 

perennial species for forage or 

biomass 

I.6 (+) Reduce 

runoff and soil 

erosion

I.7 (+) 

Improve 

water 

quality

I.4 (+) Improve 

soil quality

C.2 (+) Maintain or 

enhance long-term soil

 productivity

C.4 (+) Aquatic 

ecosystems;

 health of humans,

domestic and wild 

animals 

D.4 (+) Carbon 

Storage

C.5 (+) Air 

quality of the 

airshed

Start

I.1 (+) 

Quality/quantity of 

commodities 

Forage crops adapted to local climate 

and soils with best resistance to stand 

reducing diseases and/or insects are 

established as needed

D.1 (+) Improve or maintain 

livestock nutrition and/or 

health 

C.1 (+) Income 

and

income stability 

(individuals and

community) 

D.2 (+) Plant 

productivity and 

condition

I.8 Air quality

(-) Particulates

(+/-) Greenhouse gases

(+) Visibility

Forage Harvest Management (511)

Herbaceous Weed Treatment (315)

Nutrient Management (590)

Prescribed Grazing (528)
Exhibit 4.9
                                  -----------

CONSULTING  AGREEMENT  BETWEEN  RICHARD  ROSENBERG AND AMERICAN  FIRE  RETARDANT
CORPORATION

This Agreement dated April 25, 2001,  between Richard Rosenberg of 901 Faxpointe
Circle, Delray Beach, Florida, 33445, herein called Rosenberg, AND American Fire
Retardant Corporation,  located at 9337 Bond Ave., El Cajon, California,  92021,
herein  called  Company,  affirms the past and  continued  use of  Rosenberg  by
Company as a Consultant in the fields of finance, marketing, and personnel.

Company acknowledges that Rosenberg has supplied consulting services to it for a
period of nine years,  but quite  constantly in the past six years.  During that
period of time, Rosenberg never received compensation for said services, waiting
until the Company was in an improved financial position.

Both parties have therefore  agreed that the cash  compensation for said efforts
is to be for six years payable $1500 per month, for a total of $54,000. Further,
both parties have accepted that in lieu of cash,  Rosenberg has agreed to accept
compensation for said consulting work in shares of the Company.  The agreed upon
transfer rate is fifty cents (.50(cent)) per share for free-trading shares.

Thus  Rosenberg  is due the amount of One Hundred and Eight  Thousand  (108,000)
free trading shares of the Company to be issued promptly.

Rosenberg  aggress to continue his  consulting  efforts at a rate to be mutually
agreed on between Rosenberg and the President of the Company.

The signatories  below hereby warrant that they have full power and authority to
enter into this Agreement, and it shall be duly honored.

  /s/ Richard Rosenberg                                       4/25/01
  Accepted and Signed by Richard Rosenberg

  /s/ Stephen F. Owens/ President                             4/26/01
  Accepted and Signed by Stephen Owens, President, American Fire Retardant Corp.
# C_2004143EN.01000401.xml

| 27.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/4

---

Corrigendum to the information concerning the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

(Official Journal of the European Union C 136 of 14 May 2004)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 136 of 14 May 2004)

(2004/C 143/04)

On page 2:

for:

‘Reference period: January 2004’,

read:

‘Reference period: April 2004’.

On page 2:

for:

‘Application period: April, May and June 2004’,

read:

‘Application period: July, August and September 2004’.

---
# C_2004118EN.01004601.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/46

---

Action brought on 24 March 2004 by the Vereniging Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke Randmeren and Others against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-117/04)

(2004/C 118/100)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 March 2004 by the Vereniging Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke Randmeren, established in Zeewolde (Netherlands), Jachthaven Zijl Zeewolde B.V., established in Zeewolde (Netherlands), Wolderwijd II BV, established in Zeewolde (Netherlands), Jachthaven Strand-Horst BV, established in Ermelo (Netherlands), Recreatiegebied Erkemederstrand V.O.F., established in Zeewolde (Netherlands), Jachthaven and Campingbedrijf Nieuwboer B.V., established in Bunschoten-Spakenburg (Netherlands) and Jachthaven Naarden B.V., established in Naarden (Netherlands), represented by T.R. Ottervanger and A.S. Bijleveld.

The applicants claim that the Court of First Instance should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2003)3890fin of 17 December 2003 concerning aid measures implemented by the Netherlands in favour of non-profit making marinas in the Netherlands and deem the aid granted to be unlawful aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2003)3890fin of 17 December 2003 concerning aid measures implemented by the Netherlands in favour of non-profit making marinas in the Netherlands and deem the aid granted to be unlawful aid;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas and main arguments

In the contested decision the Commission is of the opinion that, in regard to the marinas concerned, there is no State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC. According to the Commission, in regard to the Wieringermeer marina, there is no benefit and that, in regard to the Nijkerk and Enkhuizen marinas, trade between the Member States is not adversely affected by the aid measure.

In support of their application, the applicants submit that the Commission misapplied and misconstrued Article 87(1) EC. They maintain first that the Commission manifestly erred in its assessment in accepting that the aid measure in regard to the marinas in Enkhuizen and Nijkerk does not affect trade between the Member States. According to the applicants, the marinas are active in an international tourist sector and do not have a strictly local function.

They further submit that the Commission also manifestly erred in its assessment in regard to the calculation of the amount of State aid in favour of the marina in Nijkerk. According to the applicants, the Commission wrongly proceeded on the basis that the estimation was based on an unpolluted and well-maintained marina.

According to the applicants, there is also State aid in the case of the Wieringermeer marina.

---
# L_2015210EN.01003801.xml

| 7.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/38

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1278 of 9 July 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards instructions, templates and definitions

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 205 of 31 July 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 205 of 31 July 2015

On page 26, in rows 100 to 120 of the table:

for:

| ‘100 | of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 110 | Derivatives & Long Settlement Transactions | | | | | | |
| 120 | of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP’; | | | | | | |

‘100

of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP

110

Derivatives & Long Settlement Transactions

120

of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP’;

read:

| ‘100 | of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 110 | Derivatives & Long Settlement Transactions | | | | | | |
| 120 | of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP’. | | | | | | |

‘100

of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP

110

Derivatives & Long Settlement Transactions

120

of which: centrally cleared through a QCCP’.

---
#### Carl C. Whitehouse *vs.*Granville A. Durrell.

Knox County.

Decided November 20, 1911.

Action of assumpsit to recover the consideration for one undivided half of a farm. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiff for $600. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial also a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

Motions overruled.

*C. T. Smalley,*for plaintiff.

*Reuel Robinson,*for defendant.
Exhibit
  32.2


---

Certification
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  act of 2001.


---

In connection
  with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form
  10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Paul Ouellette, Chief
  Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:


> The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
>     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
>   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
>     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: July
      19, 2004
|--------------------------

| | /s/
      Jean-Paul Ouellette
      Jean-Paul
      Ouellette, Chief Accounting Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### Greb, Appellant, vs. Greb and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Geo. W. Taylor,*attorney, and *Matt Taylor*of counsel, both of Kenosha.

For the respondents : *Foley & Brach*of Racine.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 15



The Board of Directors
Duke-Weeks Realty Limited Partnership




Gentlemen:

RE:   Registration Statements Nos. 333-49911, 333-04695 and 333-26845

With   respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,   we
acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
April 26, 2000  related to our review of  interim  financial
information.

Pursuant  to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933,  such
report  is  not  considered a part of a  registration  statement
prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of sections 7  and
11 of the Act.




KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
May 11, 2000
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.31


                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                             OPERATING AGREEMENT OF
                       HEART HOSPITAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Operating Agreement (the
"Operating Agreement") of HEART HOSPITAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC, a North Carolina
limited liability company (the "Company") is made and entered into effective as
of July 31, 1999 by and among the undersigned Members of the Company. All terms
not defined herein shall have the meaning provided therefore in the Operating
Agreement.

                                    RECITALS:

         1.       The Operating Agreement has previously been executed by and
among the Members of the Company;

         2.       The Members desire to amend the Operating Agreement in
accordance with the terms of this Amendment;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1.       The following provision is hereby added to the Operating
Agreement as Section 5.10(b)(viii):

                  No Member or Affiliate of a Member who is a physician shall be
                  prohibited from personally providing professional medical
                  services to patients through his or her medical practice and
                  from billing and receiving professional fees payable as a
                  result of his or her professional medical services provided
                  directly to patients, it being acknowledged that this is not
                  intended to permit any investment, ownership or other
                  beneficial interest in the equipment, facilities or technical
                  components of any CV Services or Facilities.

         2.       Except as provided above, the Operating Agreement remains in
full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.