alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA FORM 6100-2 (DBE Subcontractor Participation Form)

OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Participation Form

An EPA Financial Assistance Agreement Recipient must require its prime contractors to provide this form to its 

DBE subcontractors. This form gives a DBE1 subcontractor2 the opportunity to describe work received and/or 

report any concerns regarding the EPA-funded project (e.g., in areas such as termination by prime contractor, late 

payments, etc.). The DBE subcontractor can, as an option, complete and submit this form to the EPA DBE 

Coordinator at any time during the project period of performance.

Subcontractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposal No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address

Telephone No. Email Address

Prime Contractor Name Issuing/Funding Entity:

Contract 

Item 

Number

Description of Work Received from the Prime Contractor Involving 

Construction, Services , Equipment or Supplies

Amount Received 

by Prime 

Contractor

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as 

described in 40 CFR 33.204-33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as 

described in 40 CFR 33.202. 

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company, firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agreement with a contractor to provide 

services pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance.
EPA FORM 6100-2 (DBE Subcontractor Participation Form)

OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Participation Form

Please use the space below to report any concerns regarding the above EPA-funded project: 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average three (3) hours 

per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden 

estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated 

collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send 

the completed form to this address.

Subcontractor Signature Title/ date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UROGEN CORP. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         299,168                 314,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,072,747                 348,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,314,458                 683,874
<PP&E>                                         448,802                 410,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,178                  26,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,794,933               1,097,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          454,753               1,958,218
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         65                      58
<COMMON>                                        12,098                   9,379
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,280,227)             (1,943,165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,268,064)             (1,933,728)
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,812                 192,300
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,553,010                 504,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,890                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,842,345)               (311,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,842,345)               (311,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,842,345)               (311,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
# C_2004224EN.01000702.xml

| 8.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/3501 — SEB TRYGG LIV/CODAN PENSION)

(2004/C 224/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3501. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3501. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 August 5, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Senior Vice President,
Finance, and Chief
Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    The Form 10-K of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the period ended December 31,
2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 Date: March 16, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas H. LowderThomas H. LowderChief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7820

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BUTTON JACK RHODES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-92-2, CA-95-1151-R) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Button Jack Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rhodes , Nos. CR-92-2; CA-95-1151-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 29, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant has filed an application for a certificate of appealability and a motion to supplement that application. Because Appellant’s § 2255 motion was filed prior to implementation of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a certificate of appealability is notrequired. Therefore, we deny Appellant’s application for a certificate of appealability and the supplemental motion. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 10.6**

 

**THIRD AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT**

 

This **THIRD AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT** (this “Third Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June27, 2005, by and among **CORAUTUS GENETICS INC**., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, **VASCULAR GENETICS INC**., a Delaware corporation (“VGI” and, together with the Parent, the“Issuers”), and **BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION**, a Delaware corporation (the “Purchaser” and, together with the Issuers, the “Parties”). 

 

**WHEREAS**, the Parties entered into a Loan Agreement dated as of July30, 2003, as amended by a First Amendment dated as of December 29, 2003 and a Second Amendment dated as of July 22, 2004 (collectively, the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which the Purchaser agreed to subscribe for, subject to theterms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, certain senior convertible promissory notes of the Issuers; 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Purchaser and the Parent have entered into an Investment Agreement dated as of June 27, 2005 (the “Second InvestmentAgreement”), pursuant to which the Purchaser has agreed to purchase certain capital stock of the Parent; 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Parties have agreed to modify Milestone III (as defined in the Loan Agreement) to change the nature of such milestone, and theexecution and delivery of this Third Amendment is a condition precedent to the closing of the Second Investment Agreement; and 

 

**WHEREAS,** capitalized terms that are not defined in this Third Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Loan Agreement.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** in consideration of the premises andthe mutual representations and warranties, agreements and covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

1. The definition of “Milestone III” set forth in Article I, Section 1.01 of the Loan Agreement, shall be deleted andreplaced with the following: 

 

“Milestone III” means the closing of an equity round of financing from one or more parties other than Purchaser, on or after June 21, 2005, with net proceeds received by the Company of at least $5,000,000 in the aggregate.

 

2. All provisions of the Loan Agreement as specificallyamended by this Third Amendment are hereby in all respects ratified and confirmed. 

 

3. This Third Amendment may be signed in one or more counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same Third Amendment. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be executed by theirrespective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written. 

 

CORAUTUS GENETICS INC.

asIssuer
By: 
/s/ Richard E. Otto
  Richard E. Otto  President and Chief Executive Officer
VASCULAR GENETICS INC.

asIssuer
By: 
/s/ Richard E. Otto
  Richard E. Otto  President and Chief Executive Officer
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

asPurchaser
By: 
/s/ Lawrence C. Best
  Lawrence C. Best  
Executive Vice President &

Chief FinancialOfficer
# Waste Recycling (No.) (633) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Waste Recycling (No.) (633) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Waste Recycling (No.) (633).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Waste Recycling (No.) (633) (10/17) Standard Document(107.88 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Waste Recycling (No.) (633) Overview(91.13 KB)

Waste Recycling (No.) (633) CPPE(25.45 KB)

Waste Recycling (No.) (633) Network Effects Diagram(51.63 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


         The following is a list of all subsidiaries of the Company,
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization and the percentage of shares
owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            STATE OR OTHER
                                            JURISDICTION OF       PERCENTAGE OF
                  NAME                      INCORPORATION         SHARES OWNED
-------------------------------------       ---------------       --------------
<S>                                         <C>                   <C>
Billing Acquisition Corp.                     Delaware               100%
Billing Concepts, Inc.                        Delaware               100%
Billing Concepts Systems, Inc.                Texas                  100%
Computer Resources Management I, Inc.         Delaware               100%
Concepts Acquisition Corp.                    Delaware               100%
Enhanced Services Billing, Inc.               Delaware               100%
Interlata Aviation, Inc.                      Texas                  100%
Princeton TeleCom Corporation                 Delaware                22%
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),   Michael  A.
Cederstrom,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  of the  Company,  does hereby  certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Cederstrom
--------------------------------
Michael A. Cederstrom
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2008

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX  Holdings,  Inc.  and will be retained by TX  Holdings,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       76
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02341]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Second Review)]


Barium Carbonate From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping 
duty order on barium carbonate from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on February 3, 2014 (79 FR 
6219) and determined on May 9, 2014 that it would conduct a full review 
(79 FR 29454, May 22, 2014). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on August 1, 2014 (79 
FR 44864). The hearing was cancelled at the request of the domestic 
interested party.
    The Commission completed and filed its determination in this review 
on February 2, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC 
Publication 4518 (February 2015), entitled Barium Carbonate from China: 
Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 2, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-02341 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Otto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corautus Genetics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Atwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2100 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority to provide 

work-study allowance for certain activities by individuals receiving educational assistance by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2017 

Mr. TAKANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority to provide work-study allowance for certain activities 

by individuals receiving educational assistance by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Work-Study for Stu5 dent Veterans Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2100 IH

1 SEC. 2. WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE. 

2 Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2022’’ each place it ap4 pears and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2027’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00200

- CV

GARY OBLETON v. CYNTHIA GUZMAN
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 15

- 1380

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appe al, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant, although he is exempt from payment due to his inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 1, 2016