alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (U Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        - Uprates, Power (See  Power Uprates )
        - Uranium
        - Alternatives Evaluated in the GEIS
        - Applications (In Review)
        - Applications, Restarts, and Expansions (Expected)
        - Comparison of Conventional Mill, Heap Leach, and ISL Facilities
        - Conventional Uranium Mills
        - Conversion
        - Deconversion
        - Enrichment
        - Environmental Impact Areas Analyzed
        - Extraction Methods
        - Facility Locations
        - Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities
        - Heap Leach and Ion-Exchange Facilities
        - In Situ Leach Recovery Facilities
        - Licensed Facilities
        - Mill Tailings
        - Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978
        - Outreach Strategy for Indian Tribes Potentially Affected by Uranium Recovery Sites
        - Oversight
        - Public Involvement
        - Public Involvement in the Development of the GEIS
        - Recovery
        - Regulations, Guidance, and Communications
        - Sites Undergoing Decommissioning

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, June 18, 2021
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                                                    ------------



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Precision Drilling Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hank B. Swartout, Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


     By:   /s/ Hank B. Swartout
          --------------------------------
          Hank B. Swartout
          Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


April 26, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JIMMY EUGENE PARKER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:05-cr-00158-TDS-1; 1:16-

cv-00493-TDS-JEP)

Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Eugene Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Eugene Parker, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must 

be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. 

Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 3, 2017. The 

notice of appeal was filed on January 30, 2018.

*

 Because Parker failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny 

Parker’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Resolution of Generic Safety Issues (NUREG-0933, Main Report with Supplements 1–34; formerly titled "A Prioritization of Generic Safety Issues")

[Body Content]

Page Last Reviewed/Updated [DATE]
#### Peterson, by Guardian, and another, Appellants, vs. Glim and others, Respondents.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HELPMATE
ROBOTICS INC. SECOND QUARTER 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         268,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (44,297)
<INVENTORY>                                    641,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,474,526
<PP&E>                                       4,604,635
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,742,880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,666,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,788,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,400,976
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,848,398)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,666,532
<SALES>                                        102,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,760,081
<CGS>                                           51,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,249,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (951,740)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (131,031)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (571,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (571,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (571,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1353
JOSEPH WOLETE, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-916-409) Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin K. Fogam, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, John M. McAdams, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Wolete, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Wolete challenges the immigration judge’s finding that his asylum application was untimely and that he failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances or extraordinary circumstances excusing the late filing. See8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4), (5) (2003). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this claim pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). See Castellano-Chacon v. INS , 341 F.3d 533, 544 (6th Cir. 2003); Tarrawally v. Ashcroft , 338 F.3d 180, 185-86 (3rd Cir. 2003); Tsevegmid v. Ashcroft , 336 F.3d 1231, 1235 (10th Cir. 2003); Fahim v. United States Attorney Gen. , 278 F.3d 1216, 1217-18 (11th Cir. 2002); Hakeem v. INS , 273 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir. 2001); Ismailov v. Reno , 263 F.3d 851, 854-55 (8th Cir. 2001). Given this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of Wolete’s asylum claim. Accordingly, we deny Wolete’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**








Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FMB Equibanc, Inc. (the
      "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005(the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
      Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated
                March 27, 2006
            By:/s/
                Dwayne E. RockerDwayne
                E. RockerSecretary(Principal
                financial and accounting officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                      SUBSIDIARIES OF RYERSON TULL, INC.
                      ----------------------------------


The subsidiaries of Ryerson Tull, Inc. (other than certain subsidiaries which,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, do not constitute a
significant subsidiary), one of which is incorporated in the State of Delaware
and one of which is incorporated in the State of Georgia, as noted below,  and
each of which is wholly owned by Ryerson Tull, Inc., are as follows:



               Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
               (a Delaware corporation)



               J. M. Tull Metals Company, Inc.
               (a Georgia corporation)
# CA2004153EN.01000101.xml

| 10.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 153/1

---

NOTICE OF VACANCY

(Ref. A/013)

Ref. A/013

ADMINISTRATOR

(2004/C153A/01)

In the context of the Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP), the General Secretariat of the Council intends to recruit an administrator at grade A*9 in Directorate-General E — External Relations — Directorate VIII, which is responsible for defence aspects.

More information (available in English and French) and application forms may be obtained by contacting the Selection and Recruitment Department by e-mail to service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int, or on its website at the following address: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Deadline: 9 July 2004, the postmark serving as proof.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,857
<SECURITIES>                                    13,591
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,579
<PP&E>                                          11,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,152
<SALES>                                         34,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,619
<CGS>                                           18,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                       833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,338
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
        for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji,
        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
        February 27, 2007
 
 
 /S/   
                  FIROZ H LALJIFiroz
                  H. LaljiChairman
                  and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TIB FINANCIAL CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,502,410
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,962
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,658,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,921,641
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      44,440,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        42,292,323
<LOANS>                                    289,880,721
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,996,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             392,129,331
<DEPOSITS>                                 346,903,520
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,712,056
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,551,972
<LONG-TERM>                                    659,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       449,014
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,853,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             392,129,331
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             22,926,064
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,111,761
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               867,634
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            27,905,459
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          11,178,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,298,888
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,606,571
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  540,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 643
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             16,740,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,492,908
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,165,808
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       47,047
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,118,761
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                     69,701
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,993,343
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,517,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  108,413
<RECOVERIES>                                    47,711
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,996,532
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,996,532
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         An Employment  Agreement  between Ralph Henson as Employee and InMedica
Development Corporation, a Utah corporation, as Employer,  effective as of April
1, 2001.

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS  Employer and Employee  previsously  entered into an Employment
Confidentiality   and  Competition   Agreement  dated  December  11,  1999  (the
"Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS the parties  now desire to provide  for  additional  employment
based on  certain  terms of the prior  Employment  Agreement  for an  additional
period;

         THEREFORE,  in consideration of the promises herein,  the parties agree
as follows:

         1.  The terms of the prior Employment Agreement are incorporated herein
as the  employment  agreement  between the  parties,  as those terms are amended
below.

         2.  Paragraphs one and two of the Employment  Agreement are amended and
restated in their entirety as follows:

         1.  Employment.  Employer  does hereby  employ  Employee on a full-time
         basis as chief executive officer and president of Employer for a period
         of two years beginning  April 1, 2001.  Employee shall continue to be a
         member of the board of directors  during the term of this agreement and
         shall work under the direction of the Board of Directors.

         2.  Compensation.Employer shall compensate Employee in the sum of Seven
         Thousand Dollars per month ($7,000) salary during the remainder of 2001
         and in the sum of Eight  Thousand  Dollars  per month  ($8,000)  salary
         beginning January 1, 2002 through March 30, 2003.

         DATED the 25th day of April, 2001.

         INMEDICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Employer

         By: /s/ Larry E. Clark
         ----------------------
                 Larry E. Clark
         Its Chairman


         By: /s/ Ralph Henson
         --------------------
                 Ralph Henson
         Employee
EXHIBIT 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Gaming Systems, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Dunning, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:   June 30, 2007                       By: /s/ Richard Dunning
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Richard Dunning
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.1 Confidential Mrs. Katherine Greenberg Dear Kate, I am sending you this letter to document our confidential and preliminary
discussions regarding your employment with Endocare. You indicated that you
have a number of issues regarding your employment, and, among other things,
were potentially considering notifying Endocare that you were purportedly
terminating your employment for Good Reason under Section 3(c)(iii)(B) of
your Employment Agreement, on the basis that following my employment as the CEO
at Endocare on December 15, 2003 your responsibilities were changed and from
your perspective such change constituted a material reduction in
responsibility. As we discussed, without expressing any opinion with respect to the existence
or absence of Good Reason, as defined in Section 3(c)(iii)(B) of your
Employment Agreement, Endocare agrees that, for any facts or circumstances that
arose from December 2003 through February 2004, the 6-month notice period
referred to in Section 3(c)(iii)(B) is hereby tolled until August 15, 2004.
This letter does not amend or waive any other provision of your Employment
Agreement, which continues in full force and effect. In the interim, both
parties will use diligent and good faith efforts to address your concerns in a
mutually agreeable fashion. Kate, if you are in agreement with the foregoing, then please so indicate by
signing both copies of this letter and returning one to me. By signing this
letter, the parties acknowledge and agree that this letter shall not be
construed as an admission of liability by either party, and each party hereby
reserves all rights to which such party may be entitled under the Employment
Agreement or otherwise. Sincerely, ENDOCARE, INC. /s/ Craig T. Davenport
Craig T. Davenport
C.E.O. & Chairman AGREED: /s/ Katherine Greenberg