alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSite HelpElectronic Submittals Application

# Contact Us About Electronic Submittals

For answers to many frequently asked questions, see the NRC’s Electronic Submittals Application page. If, after reviewing these pages, you still have comments or questions, you may complete the appropriate sections of this form.

## Electronic Filing Help Desk

In addition, the NRC's Electronic Filing Help Desk is available to support stakeholders (including members of the public) who submit documents electronically to the NRC and access documents through Electronic Information Exchange and the Electronic Hearing Docket. You can reach the Help Desk by email using this form, or by telephone (toll free) at 866-672-7640. The Help Desk's hours of operation are 9:00 am to 6:00 pm Eastern time, Monday through Friday (excluding Government holidays).

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, June 05, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Getting Started
          - Adjudicatory Submissions
          - Reference Materials for Electronic Submissions
          - Contact Us
          - Criminal History
          - General Submissions
          - Obtain a Digital Certificate

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Other Ways to Contact Us

**Adjudicatory Submissions:**Office of the Secretary, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff E-mail:Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov

**Criminal History Program:**CrimHist@nrc.gov

**General Submissions:**MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov

**Fitness for Duty Reporting:**FFDProgram@nrc.gov

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, June 05, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES SEPTEMBER 30,
2000, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERECE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,208)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,378
<PP&E>                                       5,272,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               (340,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,627,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          300,791
<BONDS>                                      2,200,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,123,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,627,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               627,994
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  317,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            160,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   160,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.09


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.



By:

/s/    GILBERT HUName:

Gilbert HuTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Argued and submitted June 10,

affirmed September 21, 1983

#### In the Matter of Martin Andrew Akins, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF COOS COUNTY, *Respondent, v.*AKINS, *Appellant.*

(J-612-File #40; CA A26606)

669 P2d 339

Ronald K. Cox, Assistant Public Defender, North Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Newman, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*625PER CURIAM.

The juvenile was found to be within the jurisdiction of the court on the basis of activities which would constitute a crime if committed by an adult. The dispositional order required him to make restitution to the victims. He contends, on appeal, that ORS 419.507(1) (a) is unconstitutional and that the court did not make adequate findings regarding his ability to pay restitution. The juvenile made no objection to the dis-positional order and did not raise the issue he now raises on appeal. We decline to consider the merits of these contentions, because they were not preserved by appropriate objections in the trial court. *State v. Dillon,*292 Or 172, 637 P2d 602 (1981); *State v. Deloge,*55 Or App 742, 639 P2d 1293 (1982); *State v. Lake,*49 Or App 505, 619 P2d 1332 (1980), *rev den*290 Or 519 (1981).

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

ZORAN CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Karl Schneider, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2005 |                               |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                               | /s/ Karl Schneider                 |   |
|                               | Karl Schneider                     |
|                               | Senior Vice President, Finance and |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer            |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6657** 

LARRY GENE MARTIN, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v.
TIM RILEY , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Margaret B. Seymour , Chief District Judge. ( 4:11

- cv - 00473

- MBS )

Submitted : June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Gene Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in th is circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Gene Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ; see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim o f the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in form a pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# Resources

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 

### WinSRFR - Version 5.1.1

Surface irrigation system modeling.

### WinTR-20 System Controller/Editor Version 3.30.1

WinTR-20 is a single event, watershed-scale runoff and routing model.  Like WinTR-55, this model applies to both urban and agricultural areas - allowing users to develop runoff hydrographs for multilpe sub-areas and at selected points along the stream system. 

WaterWatershed Programs

### WinTR-55 Small Watershed Hydrology Version 2.00.00

WinTR-55 is a single event, small watershed rainfall-runoff model.

WaterWatershed Programs

### Wisconsin Engineering Resources

Wisconsin Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) Engineering Specifications and Conservation Practice Standards.

Wisconsin

### Wisconsin Soil Data Mart

The following links to data are not static; these links pull information and hits from the official soils database live. Interactive maps and dynamic reports are available below.

WisconsinSoil

### Wisconsin State Soil - Antigo Silt Loam

Many states have a designated state bird, flower, fish, tree, rock, etc. And, many states also have a state soil – one that has significance or is important to the state.

Wisconsin

### Woody Residue Treatment (Ac.) (384) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Woody Residue Treatment (Ac.) (384).

PlantsForestry

### Working for Montana Agriculture

The NRCS, Montana Association of Land Trusts, and the Heart of the Rockies Initiative have partnered to produce a report of the economic impact of ALE easements in Montana as well as stories from families that have realized economic benefits on their farm or ranch.

MontanaAgricultural Conservation Easement ProgramAgricultural Land Easements

### Wyoming GIS

GIS stands for Geographic Information Systems. GIS software automates databases and maps to reveal the spatial patterns of data.

Wyoming

### Wyoming Snow Survey & Water Supply Program

The NRCS Snow Survey Program provides mountain snowpack data and streamflow forecasts for the western United States.  Common applications of snow survey products include water supply management, flood control, climate modeling, recreation, and conservation planning.

Wyoming

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  19 
-  20 
-  21 
-  22 
-  23 
-  24 
-  25 
-  26 
-  27
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           259,199
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,855
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,194
<EQUITIES>                                     4,521
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,660
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 280,431
<CASH>                                         5,841
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             12,343
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         12,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,231
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                156,622
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            66,069
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 21,474
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,231
<PREMIUMS>                                     149,220
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            18,077
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             5,406
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,020
<BENEFITS>                                     103,301
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    43,320
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  3.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.32
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 141,220
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            107,273
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,972)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             49,858
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               40,258
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                156,622
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        3,972
        


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Service Provider Licenses, Final Report (NUREG-1556, Volume 18, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 18, Revision 1 (PDF - 4.40 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2017**Date Published:** August 2017

**Prepared by:**L. DimmickJ. Dalzell-BishopK. ModesJ. WaldenR. J. Torres

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for materials licenses for service providers. In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to the NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

**Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**

This NUREG contains information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collections were approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0044, 3150-0014, 3150-0035, 3150-0017, 3150-00016, 3150-0001, 3150-0010, 3150-0214, 3150-0130, 3150-0009, 3150-0008, and 3150-0120.

**Public Protection Notification**

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of Planning Meeting (NUREG/CP-0170)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0170 (PDF 7.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2000**Date Published:**April 2000

**Proceedings prepared by:** M. Dey

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) convened a planning meeting with international experts and practitioners of fire models to discuss a potential international collaborative project to evaluate fire models for nuclear power plant applications. The meeting was jointly organized with the Society of Fire Protection Engineers and the University of Maryland and was held at the University of Maryland on October 25 - 26, 1999. Thirty representatives from eight national organizations in the United States and six international organizations from five countries attended the planning meeting. The attendees represented organizations in the nuclear industry and built environment in several countries that are involved in the development and use of fire models.

All organizations represented responded positively to NRC's invitation for a collaborative effort. Representatives indicated they intended to participate and contribute to the project with the goal of obtaining results of mutual benefit to their respective organizations. Participants plan to contribute through a variety of means. The core of the work will be conducted by six nuclear organizations in France, Germany, Finland, and the United States. The initial effort will consist of analyzing a specific issue, safe separation distance between redundant trains in nuclear power plants, to evaluate how current state-of-the-art fire models can be used to support decision making regarding this issue in nuclear power plants. A guidance/reference document oriented toward "low end" users on the use of current fire models will be the initial product of the project. After several issues are evaluated and the current state of the art of fire models better defined, a second phase of the project could be initiated to improve fire modeling and tools in order to support their extended use for fire safety design and decision making in nuclear power plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Sponsor Letterhead

<Date>

<Name>State ConservationistNatural Resources Conservation Service<Address><City, State>

Dear <STC Name>,

Attached is statement of commitment from the <Sponsor Name> for federal assistance through the Watershed Rehabilitation Program. We are requesting funds for <state the purpose of the funding (e.g. dam assessment, planning, design, or construction)> of <Name of Watershed>, <Name of Dam> located in <County Name>, <State Name>. 

<Name of Dam> was constructed under the <PL-566 authority> in <enter year dam was constructed>.

<Provide a description of the dam and need for rehabilitation *(e.g. The Beaver Creek Reservoir serves as the sole drinking water supply for the Crozet Area in Albemarle County, as well as providing flood protection and recreational benefits to surrounding areas of Albemarle County. Rehabilitation of this dam is necessary to bring the dam into compliance with NRCS and <State**Name> state dam safety criteria and performance standards and reduce risk to loss of life.)*> 

The names and addresses of the contacts for this project are:

<Name>, <Title>, <Address>, <Phone Number>, <email>

<Name>, <Title>, <Address>, <Phone Number>, <email>

We are grateful for the opportunity to submit this application. Please let us know if any additional supporting documentation is needed.

Sincerely,

<Sponsor Name><Title>

**Statement of Commitment**

1. Assist in leading the locally led planning effort

2. Obtain needed land rights including use of power of eminent domain, if necessary, for project installation

3. Provide local cost-share funds and/or in-kind services to provide the required 35 percent of total project costs

4. Enter into a new Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), with the understanding of the terms of the new O&M agreement, if project construction is undertaken

5. Provide funds for continuing O&M actions

6. Obtain required permits and approvals for project installation at our cost

7. Provide leadership to assure appropriate land use controls are enacted or acquired for downstream areas prior to construction if a low or significant hazard dam is involved

8. Provide leadership to assure adequate land treatment measures have been installed and maintained on at least 50 percent of the watershed area above the dam

9. Enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with NRCS before being credited with the value of in-kind contributions

I concur with the above listed statements and hereby commit the <Sponsor Names> to cooperate fully with NRCS for developing a plan for rehabilitation of <Name of Dam>.

<Signature> 

<Name>

<Title<