alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Conference on Vessel Penetration Inspection, Crack Growth and Repair (NUREG/CP-0191)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

NUREG/CP-0191

Download Complete Document

**Presentations**
        - Front Matter and Opening Session
        - Session I, Inspection Techniques, Results and Future Developments
        - Session II, Continued Plant Operation
        - Session III, Structural Analysis and Fracture Mechanics Issues
        - Session IV, Crack Growth Rate Studies for the Disposition of Flaws
        - Session V, Foreign Experience, Mitigation and Summaries
        - Panel Session

**Manuscripts**
        - Session I with Front Matter, Inspection Techniques, Results and Future Developments
        - Session II, Continued Plant Operation
        - Session III, Structural Analysis and Fracture Mechanics Issues
        - Session IV, Crack Growth Rate Studies for the Disposition of Flaws
        - Session V, Foreign Experience and Mitigation

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2005**Date Published:** September 2005

Compiled by: T. S. Mintz, Materials Engineer and W. H. Cullen, Sr. Materials Engineer

Prepared for Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 NRC Job Code Y6722

Availability Notice

## Abstract

These two volumes of proceedings contain the visual projections (in Volume I), and the contributed manuscripts (in Volume II) from the Conference on Vessel Head Penetration, Crack Growth and Repair, held at the Gaithersburg Marriott at Washingtonian Center on September 29 – October 2, 2003. The conference was co-sponsored by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Argonne National Laboratory. Over two hundred attendees were provided with 45 presentations, divided into five sessions: (I) Inspection Techniques, Results, and Future Developments, (II) Continued Plant Operation, (III) Structural Analysis and Fracture Mechanics Issues, (IV) Crack Growth Rate Studies for the Disposition of Flaws, and (V) Mitigation of Nickel-Base Alloy Degradation and Foreign Experience. The conference opened with a plenary session including presentations giving the overview from the NRC Office of Regulatory Research, and an overview of nickel-base alloy cracking issues worldwide. The conference closed with a panel session consisting of industry representatives and NRC management discussing the prognosis for future issues in this area of concern.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0019 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-051-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 407 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 551 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a crack in the tailboom assembly, failure 

of the tailboom, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Cost

We estimate the cost of compliance for the first year as follows:

 We assume 1 initial 100-hour TIS inspection and 2 recurring inspections, which will 

each take about 2.5 hours. At an average labor rate of $85 per hour, this will result in a cost of 

about $213 per inspection per helicopter or a total annual inspection cost for 3 recurring 

inspections of about $639 per helicopter. 

 We assume 1 initial inspection and thereafter 4 recurring inspections per year for 

helicopters with a tailboom assembly that has 6,900 or more hours TIS, which will each take 3 

hours at the average labor rate of $85 per hour or $255 per helicopter. Multiplying this $255 

times the 5 recurring inspections, the total annual cost will be $1,275 per helicopter. 

 We assume 1 initial inspection and 12 recurring inspections per year for helicopters 

with a tailboom assembly that has 8,600 or more hours TIS. If each inspection takes 3.25 hours, 

at the average labor rate of $85 per hour, each inspection will cost about $276. Multiply $276 

times the 13 recurring inspections will result in a total annual inspection cost of $3,588 per 

helicopter. We expect the cost of pilot checks to be minimal.

 Replacing the tailboom will take 10 work hours at an average labor rate of $85 per 

hour for a total labor cost of $850 per helicopter. Parts will cost $82,850 for a total cost per 

helicopter of $83,700. Assuming that 5 helicopters per year will need a replacement tailboom, the 

fleet replacement cost will total $418,500.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       826
<INVENTORY>                                     13,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,709
<PP&E>                                          58,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,995
<SALES>                                         55,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,558
<CGS>                                           37,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHELLY PONIATOWSKI, DOC #H19579, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-895

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 21, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of US Wireless Online, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel P. Burke, Sr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Daniel P. Burke, Sr.

Daniel P. Burke, Sr.

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 16, 2004
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75378) pertaining to the 2001 StockOption Plan for Directors and 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees  (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132175) pertaining to the 2005 StockIncentive Plan of Calavo Growers, Inc.of our reports dated January 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Calavo Growers, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Calavo Growers,Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2007.         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     Woodland Hills, California
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of
my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERG  
| |                          
| | Katherine Greenberg      
| | Senior Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer  

Date: June 28, 2004

1
# L_2015220EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 220/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 220/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1413

of 10 August 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ogulinski kiseli kupus/Ogulinsko kiselo zelje (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Ogulinski kiseli kupus’/‘Ogulinsko kiselo zelje’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Ogulinski kiseli kupus’/‘Ogulinsko kiselo zelje’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ogulinski kiseli kupus’/‘Ogulinsko kiselo zelje’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ogulinski kiseli kupus’/‘Ogulinsko kiselo zelje’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Ogulinski kiseli kupus’/‘Ogulinsko kiselo zelje’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 115, 10.4.2015, p. 20.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# NRC ATWS-I Stability Tests with Downskew Axial Power Profile: KATHY Test Series STS123 (NUREG/CR-7272)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7272 (PDF – 54.58 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2020**Date Published:** September 2020

**Prepared by:**D. Tinkler1, K. Greene1, K. Quick1J. Kronenberg2, R. Velton2, F. Wehle2A. Beisiegel3, T. Berger3, F. El Rharbaoui3P. Yarsky4

1Framatome Inc.Richland, WA 99354, USA

2Framatome GmbH91001 Erlangen, Germany

3Framatome GmbH63787 Karlstein, Germany

4U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC, 20555

Tarek Zaki, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Natural circulation instability tests were performed in the Multifunction Thermal Hydraulic Test Facility KATHY in Karlstein, Germany. One type of test involved stepping up test assembly power in oscillating flow until failure to rewet occurs based on temperature observation. A second type of test introduced a simulated neutronic feedback to dynamically change the power, again with flow oscillations up to the point of failure to rewet. Two tests featured a transient inlet temperature. The largest flow oscillations in the test program ranged from ~ −7 kilograms per second (kg/s) to 13 kg/s. The tests varied system pressure (7 and 8 megapascals), water level in the steam-water separator (0.4 and 1.1 meters), and inlet subcooling (20 Kelvin and 35 Kelvin). A full-scale boiling-water reactor rod bundle was simulated in these tests. Before the dynamic instability tests, the rod bundle was characterized with single-phase- and two-phase pressure drop tests. Steady-state critical power tests were also performed to characterize the conditions under which steady-state dryout occurs. This report describes the tests performed as part of this program. This research effort supported the continued development and benchmarking of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reactor systems analysis computer code with state-of-the-art, realistic modeling capabilities thereby enabling more effective use of confirmatory calculations in licensing reviews.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I Claudia
M. Pieropan, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, that to our knowledge:

(3)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


Date: August 9, 2004
                                /s/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Claudia M. Pieropan
                                Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5 Simulation of Total Loss of Feedwater in Two-Loop PWR (NUREG/IA-0536)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0536 (PDF – 4.27 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2022**Date Published:** February 2023

**Prepared by:**Andrej Prošek

Jožef Stefan InstituteJamova cesta 39SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In Europe the design extension conditions (DEC) were introduced after the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident as preferred method for giving due consideration to the complex sequences and severe accidents without including them in the design basis conditions. The purpose of the study is to determine available elapsed time before core degradation and needed DEC safety features to prevent total loss of all feedwater (TLOFW) in a two-loop pressurized water reactor. In its documents, both WENRA (Western European Association of Nuclear Regulators) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) present TLOFW initiating event as a possible DEC for existing nuclear power plants.

For simulations six U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RELAP5 computer code versions were used to study the possible impact of code version on the results. The initiating event for TLOFW are multiple failures in which, besides the loss of main feedwater also auxiliary feedwater is lost. It is assumed that both high pressure and low pressure safety injection trains and batteries are available. Four different scenarios of TLOFW have been studied. The results section shows the comparison of calculated results obtained by several RELAP5 versions. Finally, the simulated results of total loss of feedwater with DEC safety feature available are shown.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 02, 2023
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Foothills Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) that:
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: April 12, 2007 |   | By:         /s/ W. Kirk Bosché            

Name:    W. Kirk BoschéTitle:     Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32


Form
10-K


Bio-Path
Holdings, Inc.


File No.
000-53404







CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I
Peter H. Nielsen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      April 2, 2009
            /s/
       Peter H. NielsenPeter
      H. NielsenChief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.