alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Regulations (10 CFR)

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - Reactors (Parts 50, 52, 54, 55)
                  - Part 20 Radionuclides
                  - Radwaste (Part 60-63)
                  - Fuel Cycle Facilities (many parts)
                  - Uranium Recovery (Parts 20 & 40)
                  - Med/Ind/Acad Uses (many parts)
                  - Nuclear Materials Transport (Parts 71 & 73)
                  - Source Material Facilities (Parts 19-21 & 40)

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Regulations (10 CFR)

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
# CA2004194EN.01000201.xml

| 30.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 194/2

---

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS HOUA-A-2004

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

The European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) seeks candidates with a view to filling certain posts. Detailed information on these vacancies, the missions of the Centre and the procedure to be followed to prepare an application are published on the EUMC Internet site at the following address: http://eumc.eu.int.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2022

NO. 03

- 19

- 00526

- CR

Robert John Markwell, Jr. , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF J USTICE BY RNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment re ndered by the tr i a l court on June 19, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant s ha ll pay all costs relating t o this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60665 Summary Calendar

__________________

ALBERT JAMES WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BILLY RAY EVANS, Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

(4:95-CV-14LN)

______________________________________________

April 11, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Albert James Watts, a Mississippi state prisoner, appeals the
district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sheriff Evans in this civil rights suit in which Watts alleged an Eighth
Amendment excessive force claim. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm for the following reasons.

Watts failed to reb ut with any competent summary judgment proof Evans' showing that there was no material issue of fact2

regarding Watts' having "some injury." S ee Rankin v. Klevenhagen , 5 F.3d 103, 108 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, we do not consider Watts' claim that he suffers emotional problems because he raises
it for the first time on appeal. V arnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2004118EN.01003501.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-56/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 118/67)

By order of 23 March 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-56/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003

1

---
----

RECRUITMENT FOR THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)

(2004/C 193 A/01)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993, Official Journal of the European Communities L 214 of 24 August 1993 and Council Regulation (EC) 726/2004 of 31 March 2004, Official Journal of the European Union L 136 of 30 April 2004, page 1). The EMEA was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, 25 EU Member States, EEA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.

Further information on the EMEA and its activities is readily accessible through the Internet; our web address is http://www.emea.eu.int

The European Medicines Agency is organising selection procedures with a view to drawing up reserve lists for:

Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities (Official Journal of the European Union L 56 of 4 March 1968) (1).

The place of employment shall be London.

Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Communities, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions, the job descriptions and the necessary application form should be downloaded from the EMEA website http://www.emea.eu.int. The application form must be duly signed and dated and, together with all documentary evidence, must be returned no later than 20 September 2004 (date of postmark) to the following address:
EMEA - Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tel: (44-207) 418 84 00; Telefax: (44-207) 418 84 16).

----

(1)  The Council has adopted new Staff Regulations which entered into force on 1 May 2004. These Regulations include a new career structure. Successful candidates would therefore be recruited on the basis of the new Staff Regulations, in accordance with the arrangements set out, in particular, in Article 12 of Section 2 of Annex XIII (see the IntraComm website: http://www.europa.eu.int)

----
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND15d-14

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934

 

I, Jacob Inbar, President and Chief Executive Officer of AMLCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of AML Communications, Inc.

 

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in the report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods, presented in thereport.

 

The Company’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theCompany and have:

 

(a)   designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which the periodic report is being prepared;

 

(b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

The Company’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and to the audit committee ofthe Company’s board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalentfunction):

 

(i)    allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(ii)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  February 14, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Jacob Inbar                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Jacob Inbar,                          |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Pittsburgh Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                           /s/  Michael J. Kirk
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Michael J. Kirk
                                           Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2002

                                       23
**Exhibit99.3**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

Required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Refocus Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Mark A. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

1.                      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  March 28, 2003

 
|   |   /s/ Mark A. Cox         |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   Mark A. Cox             |
|   |   Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Refocus Group, Inc. and will be retained by Refocus Group,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,426,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,026,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,566,476
<PP&E>                                       2,756,748
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,091,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,481,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,338,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,327,628
<COMMON>                                       236,191
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,079,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,481,630
<SALES>                                        794,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               794,101
<CGS>                                           31,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,655,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (87,930)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,773,038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,773,038)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,773,038)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 212 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 212

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  provide a process for expediting congressional review of an Indian 
tribe's funding agreement at the Indian tribe's request, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  provide a process for expediting congressional review of an Indian 
tribe's funding agreement at the Indian tribe's request, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expediting Funding For Efficient 
Contracting Tribes Act'' or the ``EFFECT Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REVIEW OF INDIAN TRIBE FUNDING AGREEMENTS.

    Section 403 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458cc) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (g) through (l) as 
        subsections (h) through (m), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) Expedited Review.--
            ``(1) An Indian tribe that is party to a proposed funding 
        agreement may submit a written request for expedited review of 
        the agreement to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate 
        and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 
        Representatives.
            ``(2) Notwithstanding subsection (f), upon receipt of a 
        written notice, sent by the chairman and ranking minority 
        member of such committee of the Senate and the chair and 
        ranking minority member of such committee of the House of 
        Representatives, that indicates such Members' assent to an 
        Indian tribe's request under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
        shall--
                    ``(A) deem part or all of the 90-day review period 
                under subsection (f) waived, if so specified in the 
                notice; and
                    ``(B) set or amend the effective date of the 
                proposed agreement, if so specified in the notice.''; 
                and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``Native American 
        Affairs'' and inserting ``Indian, Insular and Alaska Native 
        Affairs''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME & DATE:

12:30 p.m., Thursday, February 12, 2015.

# PLACE:

NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

# CONTACT PERSON:

                        Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org.*

# AGENDA:

I. Call To Order

II. Human Resources Updates

III. Executive Session: Presentation of Quatt Report

IV. Executive Session: Senior Management Compensation

V. Executive Session: Management & Board Assessment Project Working Session

VI. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02382 Filed 2-3-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Road , Critical Area Planting, Dry Hydrant, Dust Control from Animal Activity on Open Lot Surfaces, Fence, Filter Strip, Nutrient Management, Prescribed Grazing, Roof Runoff Structure, Subsurface Drain, Trails and Walkways, Vegetated Treatment Area , Waste Storage Facility, Waste Transfer, Waste Treatment, Waste Utilization.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
#### Townsend, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Samuil Nissenbaum*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents E. R. Flint & Company and Travelers Insurance Company: *Olin & Butler*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on April 11, 1939.