alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004167EN.01000201.xml

| 26.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 June 2004

(2004/C 167/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2138 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,432 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6666 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1488 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5146 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5815 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,662 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6552 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4257 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5679 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 766 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,888 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 813 400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7379 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6348 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4657 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9107 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0729 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 395,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6741 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2138

JPY

Japanese yen

130,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,432

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6666

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1488

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5146

ISK

Iceland króna

88,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5815

CZK

Czech koruna

31,662

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6552

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4257

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5679

ROL

Romanian leu

40 766

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,888

TRL

Turkish lira

1 813 400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7379

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6348

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4657

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9107

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0729

KRW

South Korean won

1 395,57

ZAR

South African rand

7,6741

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Access Road , , Animal Trails and Walkways, Clearing & Snagging, Constructed Wetland, Critical Area Planting, Dam, Diversion, Dike, Diversion, Dry Hydrant, Fence, Fish Passage, Fish Raceway or Tank, Fishpond Management, Grade Stabilization Structure, Grassed Waterway, Irrigation Canal or Lateral, Irrigation Pipeline, Irrigation Reservoir, Irrigation System, Microirrigation, Livestock Pipeline, Open Channel, Pond, Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant, Recreation Land Grading and Shaping, Rock Barrier, Sediment Basin, Stream Crossing, Stream Habitat Improvement and Management, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, Structure for Water Control, Trails and Walkways, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Wetland Creation, Wetland Enhancement, Wetland Restoration, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# Virginia State Office

1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209RichmondVA23229

804-287-1691

1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209RichmondVA23229

Virginia

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Virginia 
-  Virginia State Office 

The State Office in Henrico County is the base of NRCS operations in the commonwealth, housing a dedicated team of technical and administrative staff who provide direct guidance and support to conservation professionals in 41 field offices.

## **Welcome to NRCS in Virginia!**

### ***Edwin Martinez, State Conservationist***

Virginia NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team. XXXX

----

## Key Contacts

### Dr. Edwin Martinez Martinez

                -    804-287-1691 
                -    edwin.martinez@usda.gov 

### Jacqulyn D. (Jackie) Alexander

                -    804-287-1684 
                -    jackie.alexander@usda.gov 

----

##   Employee Directory
**EXHIBIT12.1**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION**

**(inthousands, except ratios)**
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | **Three Months Ended March 31, 2007** | ** ** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                   |       |                                                      |       |       |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions         |       | $                                                         | 20,466     |       |   |
| Preferred distributions                                                      |       | 15,226                                                    |       |       |
| Interest expense                                                             |       | 45,704                                                    |       |       |
| Earnings before  fixed charges                                               |       | $                                                         | 81,396     |       |   |
|                                                                         |       |                                                      |       |       |
| Interest expense                                                             |       | $                                                         | 45,704     |       |   |
| Interest costs  capitalized                                                  |       | 13,071                                                    |       |       |
| Total fixed  charges                                                         |       | $                                                         | 58,775     |       |   |
|                                                                         |       |                                                      |       |       |
| Preferred distributions                                                      |       | 15,226                                                    |       |       |
| Total fixed charges and preferred distributions                              |       | $                                                         | 74,001     |       |   |
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | ** **                                                |       |       |
| **Ratio of earnings to fixed  charges**                                      | ** ** | **1.38**                                                  |       |       |
| ** **                                                                   |       |                                                      |       |       |
| **Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and  preferred distributions** | ** ** | **1.10**                                                  |       |       |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Review Plan for Fuel Cycle Facilities License Applications (NUREG-1520)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2004118EN.01002902.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/29

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 1 April 2004

in Case C-156/03 P: Commission of the European Communities v Les Laboratoires Servier SA (1)

1

(Directives 65/65/EEC and 75/319/EEC - Medicinal products for human use - Dexfenfluramine and fenfluramine - Withdrawal of a marketing authorisation - Competence of the Commission - Conditions for withdrawal - Appeal clearly unfounded)

(2004/C 118/53)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-156/03 P: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R.B. Wainwright and H. Støvlbæk), appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 January 2003 in Case T-147/00 Laboratoires Servier v Commission [2003] ECR II-85, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: Les Laboratoires Servier SA, established in Neuilly-sur-Seine (France) (Lawyers: I. S. Forrester QC and J. Killick, barrister) - the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, A. La Pergola, R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 1 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1) | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2) | The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs of these proceedings and of those relating to the application for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs of these proceedings and of those relating to the application for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 146 of 21.6.2003.

1

---
# Agricultural Conservation Easement Program - Oklahoma

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Conservation By State 
-  Oklahoma 
-  Agricultural Conservation Easement Program - Oklahoma 

The **Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP)** helps landowners, land trusts, and other entities protect, restore, and enhance wetlands, grasslands, and working farms and ranches through conservation easements.

**  Application Deadline**

**November 3, 2023**, is the first batching date for ACEP applications submitted for Fiscal Year 2024 funding.  This batching date and future batching dates will include conventional funding and /or funding through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to include variances of the program referenced.

The Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP) helps landowners, land trusts, and other entities protect, restore, and enhance wetlands, grasslands, and working farms and ranches through conservation easements. Under the Agricultural Land Easements component, NRCS helps American Indian tribes, state and local governments and non-governmental organizations protect working agricultural lands and limit non-agricultural uses of the land.  Under the Wetlands Reserve Easements component, NRCS helps to restore, protect and enhance enrolled wetlands.

Over the past 25 year, NRCS has worked with landowners to protect more than 4.4 million acres of wetlands and agricultural lands, a value of over a billion dollars in a diversified real estate portfolio that has resulted in improved soil health, water and air quality and wildlife habitat.  Read more about the easement successes around the nation.

Agricultural Land Easements - Oklahoma
NRCS provides financial assistance to eligible partners for purchasing Agricultural Land Easements (ALE) that protect the agricultural use and conservation values of eligible land.

Wetland Reserve Easements - Oklahoma
NRCS also provides technical and financial assistance directly to private landowners and Indian tribes to restore, protect, and enhance wetlands through the purchase of a wetland reserve easement.

##   Contact

Please contact your local office to begin the sign up process. 
                  -    Melanie OliverEasements Program Manager 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS- NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2015

D. Direct effect

#. Created by practice

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

LEGEND

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Residue and Tillage 

Management, 

Reduced Till (345)

Pathway

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a plus 

(+) or minus (-). These symbols 

indicate only an increase (+) or a 

decrease (-) in the effect upon 

the resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

Cover Crop (340)

Conservation Crop 

Rotation (328)

Residue and Tillage 

Management, No Till 

(329)

D.2 (+) Crop rooting depth 

D.1 (-) Soil compaction to 

30% of the area or less.

Initial setting: Cropland has compacted 

soils that limit crop growth.

1. Heavy axle loads confined to 

permanent tramlines or controlled 

traffic lanes.

Start

I.3 (+) Soil water holding 

capacity.

Controlled Traffic Farming (334)

C.2 (+) Income and income C.1 (+) Crop yields

stability (individuals and

community)

I.4 (+) Soil health

I.6 (+) Nutrient use 

and efficiency 

I.2 (+) cost to retrofit 

equipment to match tramline 

widths.

I.1 (+) Vehicle traction 

I.5 (+) Fuel efficiency
# Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) (9/10) Standard Document(27.91 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) Overview(148.71 KB)

Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) CPPE(25.39 KB)

Shallow Water Development and Management (Ac.) (646) Network Effects Diagram(26.78 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject – FY 2023

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, December 04, 2023
A.1-i

APPENDIX A-1 CONTRIBUTORS TO THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT
A.1-1

APPENDIX A-1 CONTRIBUTORS TO THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENTa

DOE Project Manager

Terrence L. Logee

LBNL Energy Efficiency Standards Group Leader

James E. McMahon

Lead LBNL Author

James D. Lutz

Chapter Authors

James D. Lutz (Ch. 1) Alex Lekov (Ch. 8)

Camilla Dunham Whitehead (Ch. 2) Xiaomin Liu & Karen H. Olson (Ch. 9)

James D. Lutz & Edward Barbourb (Ch. 3) Camilla Dunham Whitehead (Ch. 10)

Dave Winiarskic (Ch. 4) Michael McNeil & Diane Fisher (Ch. 11 & 12)

Alex Lekov & Julie Glover (Ch. 5) Edward Barbourb

 (Ch. 13)

Alex Lekov (Ch. 6) Chris Marnay & Julie Osborn (Ch. 14)

Camilla Dunham Whitehead (Ch. 7) Terry Chan (Ch. 15)

Technical Contributors

Barbara Ahlquist Dan Einstein Esther Rawner

Orpheus Allen Kristina Hamachi Judy Roberson

Nawaf Al Mansour Srinivas Katipamulac Gregory Rosenquist

Peter Armstrongc Satkartar Khalsa Irina Shukman

Justin Boggs Jason Linkwiler b

 Sriram Somasundaramc

Kerey Carter Iphigenia McGrue Phil Spectere

Stuart Chaitkin Steve P. Meyers Jeff Weinstein

Peter Chan Mithra Moezzi Laura van Wie

Pamela Condie Diana Morris Nan Wishner

Andrea Denver Francine Pintod Justin Zeitz

 

a

 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory staff, unless otherwise noted

b Arthur D. Little, Inc.

c Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

d

 U.S. Department of Energy

e

 University of California, Berkeley
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (T Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        - Technical Reports, NUREGS (See  NUREG-Series Reports )
        - Technical Specifications, Standard
        - Technical Training Center (NRC)
        - Telephone Directory
        - Topical Reports
        - Governing Regulations and Requirements
        - Overview
        - Submittal Procedures
        - The NRC's Role
        - Training and Development
        - Training on PRA risk-informed decisionmaking (See  NUREG-1855 Training Course )

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, June 18, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1977

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6406

EMILIO ROBERTO FERNANDEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-

cv-00520-JFM)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emilio Roberto Fernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen C. Brockmeyer,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Emilio Roberto Fernandez seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fernandez has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
|Exhibit 13.1
|------------



|Certification pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Metso
      Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
      2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the Report), I, Jorma Eloranta, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
of  1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 25, 2004
|--------------------



| | /s/ JORMA
      ELORANTA
      Jorma Eloranta
      President and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this certification required
by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------