alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Gelisols

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Conservation Basics 
-  Natural Resource Concerns 
-  Gelisols 

Gelisols are soils that have permafrost near the soil surface and/or have evidence of cryoturbation (frost churning) and/or ice segregation.

The central concept of Gelisols is that of soils that have permafrost within 100 cm of the soil surface and/or have gelic materials within 100 cm of the soil surface and have permafrost within 200 cm.

Gelic materials are mineral or organic soil materials that have evidence of cryoturbation (frost churning) and/or ice segeration in the active layer (seasonal thaw layer) and/or the upper part of the permafrost.

## Dominant Suborders

### Histels

Histels are the Gelisols with large amounts of organic carbon. They are in Alaska. The vegetation is mostly mosses, sedges, and shrubs. The soils are used as wildlife habitat.

### Orthels

Orthels are the Gelisols that show little or no evidence of cryoturbation. They occur throughout the Gelisol area in Alaska. The vegetation is mostly lichens, mosses, sedges, shrubs, black spruce, and white spruce. The soils are used mostly as wildlife habitat.

### Turbels

Turbels are the Gelisols show cryoturbation in the form of irregular, broken, or distorted horizon boundaries, involutions, an accumulation of organic matter on top of the permafrost, ice or sand wedges, or oriented rock fragments. They occur throughout the Gelisol area in Alaska. The vegetation is mostly mosses, sedges, shrubs, and black spruce. The soils are used mostly as wildlife habitat. The Cryepts occur on slopes that receive more solar radiation or in areas where fire or land clearing has changed the thermal properties of the soils enough to allow the permafrost to thaw.

Gelisols are known to occur only in Alaska. Most of the soils have a layer of gelic materials that is underlain by permafrost. Permafrost influences pedogenesis through its effect on the downward movement of the soil solution and on the soil forming processes.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

PUBLIC ACCESS POLICY OF THE
UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF
PENNSYLVANIA: CASE RECORDS OF
THE APPELLATE AND TRIAL COURTS :

:

:

:

:

: NO. 490

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28 th day of November

, 201 7

, in accordance with Section 7(C) of
the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts , it is Ordered that all documents filed with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that contain confidential information shall be filed in two versions,
a redacted version and an unredacted version.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall
be effective January 6 , 2018

.
Exhibit 10.11

 

Amendment No. 2 to

Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note

of

Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.

 

WHEREAS, Canadian Forest Oil Ltd. (the “Corporation”) previously has executed and delivered a Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”), payable to Forest Oil Corporation, as the Holder (“Forest”), in the maximum principal amount of US$200,000,000;

 

WHEREAS, effective as of May 13, 2010, the Corporation and Forest agreed to amend the Promissory Note to increase the maximum principal amount thereof to US$250,000,000; and

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation and Forest have agreed to again amend the Promissory Note to increase the maximum principal amount thereof to US$500,000,000.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Promissory Note shall be amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective as of June 15, 2010, all references to the aggregate principal amount that may be outstanding under the Promissory Note shall be increased to $500,000,000.

 

2.                                      The Promissory Note, as amended hereby, is ratified and reaffirmed in all respects.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has hereunto set its hand effective for all purposes.

 

	
 
    	
CANADIAN   FOREST OIL LTD.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   David M. Anderson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
David   M. Anderson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    


 

1
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)License Verification System (LVS)

# Help Desk Support for the License Verification System

The NRC has established a Help Desk to assist users process manual license verifications with NRC or Agreement State agencies and to answer questions related to credentialing, login procedures, system use, and any problems encountered in using the LVS. Each inquiry is logged and tracked for future reference. Help Desk availability is as follows:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - NSTS Login
          - Conceptual Overview of the License Verification Process
          - Manual License Verification Procedure
          - Help Desk Support

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, September 28, 2022
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Pegasus
Communications Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
        2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 18, 2005


                                        /s/ Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Memo to File

From: Kathryn Kelley

Date: 8/14/12

On August 14, 2012 EPA attended a listening session with a representative from Atlantium 

Illuminating Water Technologies

Attendees are the following:

Name Affiliation

Yariv Abromovich Altantium

Jim Lauria Team Chemistry

Ryan Albert EPA

Kathryn Kelley EPA 

The meeting included a presentation by Atlantium of a UV technology for ballast water 

treatment.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of C.B., a child. )

)

)

M.B., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3874

) 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed February 13, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche 

Arkin, Judge.

Linda C. Clark of Linda C. Clark, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee Department of Children and 

Families.

Thomasina Moore and Joanna 

Summers Brunell, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# L_2015156EN.01002301.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/23

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/957

of 17 June 2015

on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/2/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of contributions to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of contributions to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) by third States.

| (2) | The Civilian Operations Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contributions from Canada and the Kingdom of Norway to EUAM Ukraine and to consider the contributions as significant. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Civilian Operations Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contributions from Canada and the Kingdom of Norway to EUAM Ukraine and to consider the contributions as significant.

| (3) | Canada and the Kingdom of Norway should be exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUAM Ukraine, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Canada and the Kingdom of Norway should be exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUAM Ukraine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Third States' contributions

1.   The contributions from Canada and the Kingdom of Norway to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) are accepted and are considered to be significant.

2.   Canada and the Kingdom of Norway are exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUAM Ukraine.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ATLANTIC
INTERNATIONAL  ENTERTAINMENT,  LTD.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                 96,024
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       2,982,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        (603,450)
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    4,691,232
<PP&E>                                                              3,082,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (764,252)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     15,063,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,552,185
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                               12,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 9
<OTHER-SE>                                                         13,470,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       15,063,225
<SALES>                                                             3,497,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    3,497,281
<CGS>                                                                 489,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       3,430,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     27,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (344,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         (47,374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (392,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (392,174)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### Levin Bozman, v. John Armstead, and Benjamin Fessenden.

Washington.

Equity. The act of 1810, ch. 12, relates only to the *remedy*on. injunction bonds : — the act of 1800, ch. 0, requires the bond to be taken. The *mode of proceeding*presented by the act of 1810, to. wit, by *sci. fa.*may be pursued on all injunction bonds, whether taken before orsince the act of 1810.

The question in this case arose upon a demurrer to a *sciri facias-*Levin Bozman recovered a judgment at Jaw against John Morrison, who obtained an injunction and gave John Armstead and Benjamin Fessenden, securities. The bond for the injunction bore date on 23d December, *1807.*The injunction was dissolved and the bill retained as an original bill, and finally dismissed. In October, 1816, a *sci.fa.*issued, on the injunction bond against the securities, Armstead and Fessenden, to shew cause, why execution should not issue against them for the amount of the judgment and costs recovered at Jaw, by Bozman against Morrison. To this *sci.fa.*the Defendants demurred, and the Plaintiff having joined in demurrer, the case was sent to this Court.

IíueKIN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case comes here upon the objection, that the act of 1810, ch. 12, does not extend to this bond, which was executed before the passage of that act. Upon looking into the act, it is found to relate only to *the remedy*upon injunction bonds, which the legislature can alter from time to time, as shall seem expedient. The true construction of the act seems to be, that the obligee might sue by sci. *fa.*on *all*such bonds, whether executed after or before the passage of the act j for it professes only to regulate the *mode of proceeding*on the bond, which the act of 1800, ch. 9, bad required to be taken *;*and we see no reason why the remedy should be different on one bond, from what it is on another- Judgment for the Plaintiff on the demurrer.
Exhibit 32.1








Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Longe, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ Thomas J. LongeDate:           March 31, 2010
Thomas J. Longe

Vice-Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **EXHIBIT 99.1** |
|------------------|

** **

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of AML Communications,Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,that:

 
| • |   | the Quarterly Report of  the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| • |   | the information contained  in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operation of the Company.                                     |

 

 
| Dated:  August 12, 2002           |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/  Jacob Inbar                  |   |
|                                   |
| Jacob Inbar,                           |
|                                   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# FRAPCON-3.4 and FRAPCON-3.5 (NUREG/CR-7022)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**


Consent
        of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
        Firm
 
 
 We
        have
        issued our report dated February 16, 2007 (November 8, 2007 for note
        15) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
        paragraph regarding the restatement of the Company's financial statements
        discussed in Note 15), accompanying the consolidated financial statements
        included in the Annual Report of Zones, Inc. on FORM 10-K/A for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
        by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Zones, Inc.
        on
        Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-87255, 333-110750, and 333-114945).
 
 Seattle,
        Washington
 November
        8, 2007
#### TADDEO CONSTRUCTION AND LEASING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CAIN ROOFING & SHEET METAL, INC., a Division of Cain Manufacturing Company, et al., Appellees.

No. 21394.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 5, 1965.

*96Charles L. Howard, Jr., Rogers, Howard, Redden & Mills, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Morris K. Sirote, Sirote, Permutt, Friend & Friedman, Birmingham, Ala., for appellees.

Lee E. Bains, Ling & Bains, Bessemer, Ala., for H. R. Webster, and others.

Ferris S. Ritchey, Jr., Ritchey & Nicholson, Birmingham, Ala., for Cain Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., Appellee.

Before WOODBURY,* JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

No prejudicial error having been shown, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-22845-99, 333-22823-99,
333-52755-99, 333-33756-99 and 333-63154), Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-34162-99), Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-33432-99 and 333-32668-99) and
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-20357-99) of Pegasus Communications Corporation
and its subsidiaries of our report dated February 20, 2003 relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2003