alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEWLETT PACKARD                          Master Equipment Lease Agreement # 1478
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     THIS AGREEMENT dated and effective as of the 23rd day of August , 2000.

between: NOMATTERWARE INC.                      (hereinafter "Customer")

and: HEWLETT PACKARD(CANADA) LTD.               (hereinafter "HP).

       FOR MUTUAL CONSIDERATION as set out, the parties agree as follows:

Hewlett-Packard  (Canada)  Ltd.  is  pleased  to have the  opportunity  of doing
business with you. Our objective is to provide the highest quality  products and
support. In order to help us achieve this objective, we encourage your feedback.
If  you  have  any  questions  or  concerns   please   contact  Rob  Dempsey  at
403-294-3931.

This  Master  Equipment  Lease  Agreement   ("Agreement"),   with   attachments,
establishes  the  agreement  under which HP will lease to you the  products  and
other items as listed. The following documents comprise this Agreement:

                * This Master Equipment Lease Agreement
                * (list exhibits, schedules and riders)

Schedules  may be added,  deleted or amended  by mutual  agreement  from time to
time.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed and delivered the Agreement
as of the date first written above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOMATTERWARE INC.                                  HEWLETT-PACKARD (CANADA) LTD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Brad Churchill
-------------------------        -----------------------------------
Signature                        Signature


Brad Churchill, President        Rob Dempsey, Account Manager Technology Finance
-------------------------        -----------------------------------------------
Typed Name & Title               Typed Name & Title


Suite 360, 717-7th Ave. SW       Suite 3600, 150 - 6th Ave. SW
---------------------------      -----------------------------
Street Address                   Street Address

Calgary, AB T2P 0Z3              Calgary, AB T2J2S8
--------------------------       ------------------
City, Province Postal Code       City, Province Postal Code
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Crop Rotation, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Early Successional Habitat Development/Mgt., Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management, No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till, Residue Management, Seasonal, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1151

___________ Garry Dean Ensey, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] Joelle Deppa, Director, RSVP Program , * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 19, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Garry Dean Ensey appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. After-2-

carefully reviewing the record and Mr. Ensey’s brief, we conclude dismissal without prejudice was proper for the reasons the district court stated and that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2004209EN.01000702.xml

| 19.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3526 — KKR/AUTO-TEILE-UNGER)

(2004/C 209/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3526. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3526. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,276,170
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,200,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,619,340
<PP&E>                                         1,007,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,855,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,390,401
<BONDS>                                        3,013,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       75,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     65,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,855,725
<SALES>                                        1,334,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,334,202
<CGS>                                          1,104,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,120,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               898,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             50,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (882,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   38,966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (921,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (921,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.12)
        

</TABLE>
****

----

**Exhibit 13.1.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian Co., Ltd. (the  "Company") on amended  Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hyeon Seong Myeong,  President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

> 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result    of operations of the Company. 

By: /s/ *Hyeon Seong Myeong                  *  Name: Myeong, Hyeon Seong   Title: President, CEO, Director   Date: November 8 ,  2005

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2000

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM March 2014

Notes:

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D.2 (-) Suspension of particulate 

matter in the form of dust from 

mechanical action, or generated by 

wind action on surface

D.3 (-) Permeability of 

surface

Initial setting: Dust from roads and/or 

surfaces is creating an air quality issue. Start

Dust suppressants are applied to roadways or 

unpaved surfaces as needed.

LEGEND

D. Direct effect

#. Created by 

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

I.2 (-) Deposition on 

vegetation

Dust Control on Unpaved Roads 

and Surfaces (373)

C.1 (+/-) Roadway or 

unpaved surface area 

owner/manager net 

income.

C.2 (+) Vehicular 

traffic safety

C.4 (+) Community / 

Neighborhood 

relationship(s) and 

human health and 

safety

I.4 (-) Soil-bound 

chemicals in runoff 

and streams

I.3 (-) Deposition 

on water bodies or 

streams

I.1 (+) Visibility on, 

along, and near 

roadway or unpaved 

surface.

C.6 (+/-) Stream 

fauna, e.g., fish, 

invertebrates

I.5 (+/-) Sedimentation

in runoff and streams

C.3 (+) Income 

potential

C.5 (+) Vegetation 

health; crop yields

I.6 (+) Runoff

I.7 (+) Suppressant 

chemicals in runoff 

and streams

D.1 (+) Infrastructure 

and operational cost.

Sediment

control and/or 

chemical filter
# C_2004228EN.01000401.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-144/02: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 77/388/EC - VAT - Article 11(A)(1)(a) - Taxable amount - Subsidy directly linked to the price - Regulation (EC) No 603/95 - Aid granted in the dried fodder sector)

(2004/C 228/07)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-144/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Traversa and K. Gross ) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: M. Lumma), supported by Republic of Finland (Agents: T. Pynnä and E. Bygglin) and by Kingdom of Sweden (Agents: Kruse and A. Falk) — application for a declaration that, by failing to levy value added tax on aid paid under Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 of 21 February 1995 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (OJ 1995 L 63, p. 1), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 29.6.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Vsource, Inc. (the
Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.



|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 



|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 



Date:
June 16, 2003
No. 91-5827.

#### Mahecha Onofre *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Conservation Crop Rotation, Contour Buffer Strips, Contour Farming, Cover Crop, Forest Stand Improvement, Integrated Pest Management, Multi-Story Cropping, Nutrient Management, Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till, Residue and Tillage Management, No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, Residue and Tillage Management, Ridge Till, Residue Management, Seasonal, Tree/Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Tree/Shrub Site Preparation, Woody Residue Treatment

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Legend
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "report"), the undersigned, Joseph Isaac Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

          (1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  March 29, 2007

                                           /s/Joseph Isaac Gutnick
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Joseph Isaac Gutnick
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)




                                       42
#### MANSION HOUSE CENTER SOUTH REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 81-1677.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 14, 1982.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Denied.
#### Zinser, Respondent, vs. Zilske and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Parnell*of Appleton.

For the respondent: *Elmer Honkamp*of Appleton, and *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 4297

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
DONTAE PINKNEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten , Chief District Judge. ( 3:16

- cr
- 00254

- TLW

- 2 )

Submitted : December 28, 2017 Decided: January 22, 2018

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John E. Duncan, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant. Beth Drake, United States Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dontae Pinkney seeks to appeal the 125

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2012)

. On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in upwardly departing, which resulted in an
unreasonable sentence. The Government seeks to dismiss the appeal as barred by Pinkney ’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement. Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 he aring, we conclude that Pinkney knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that the issue Pinkney seeks to raise on appeal fall s squarely within the compass of his waiver of appellate rights. See United States v. Archie , 771 F.3d 217, 221 (4th Cir. 2014). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED