alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of XELR8Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Pougnet, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/          John  D. Pougnet* |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| John D. Pougnet                                                                   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                                                           |   |   |
|                                                                              |   |   |
| March 30, 2007                                                                    |   |   |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Peter M. Strumph, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    PETER M.
STRUMPH Peter M. StrumphChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: March 12, 2009


THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE REPORT, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE REPORT), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL
INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

p1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139728

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139728 COA: 292824 Genesee CC: 08-023965-FH; 08-023966-FH

ERIC DAMON LEATHERWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2011

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72431) pertaining to the AVTEAM, Inc. 1996 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated May 4, 2000 except for the third paragraph of
Note 9 as to which the date is June 7, 2000, and our report dated May 4, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule,
respectively, of AVTEAM, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
June 2, 2000
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ANTONIO NAVA-HERNANDEZ;

et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71840

Agency Nos. A096-362-284

 A096-362-285

 A096-362-286

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Juan Antonio Nava-Hernandez, Agripina Nava, and their son, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

JUL 16 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71840

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894

(9th Cir. 2003), and de novo legal questions and alleged constitutional violations,

Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 496 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition

for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen because the BIA considered the evidence they submitted and acted within

its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant

reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of

a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to

law”).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 23.1



March 5, 2015



El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc.

5871 Honeysuckle Road

Prescott, AZ 86305



Gentlemen:



The undersigned hereby consents to the reference
to the undersigned in Amendment No.2  to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
September 30, 2014 (the “Amended Annual Report”), including without limitation references in Item 2, to be filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also confirm that I have read each of the
references to me in the Amended Annual Report and concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.





| | Sincerely,           
| | ---------------------
| |                      
| | /s/ Clyde L. Smith   
| | Clyde L. Smith, Ph.D.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-80,477-01

EX P ARTE BERNIE RAY LUCAS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 16984 IN THE 2n d DIST RICT COURT

F ROM CHEROK

EE COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and
sentenc ed to fifty y ear s ’ i mprisonment. The Applicant’s appea l was dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction. Lucas v. State , No. 12-09-00346- CR (Tex. App.—Ty le r , d e li v e r e d N ovember 12, 2009, no pet.). Applicant contends that his co u n s el rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he failed to timely file a notice of appe al. The rec ord befor e us ref

lects that Applicant was deprive d of his rig ht to appea l his conviction2

in this case . There fore , we find that Applicant is entitled to the opportuni ty to fi l e an o u t -of- time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 16984 from the 2nd District Court of Cherokee County

. Applicant is or dere d returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l

so that he may then, with the aid of couns el , o b t ai n a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall i m m ed i at el y appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative s teps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment o f Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 27, 2013 Do not publish
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Implementation of droplet breakup mode in TRACE to improve the prediction of reactor core reflood conditions (NUREG/IA-0543)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0543 (PDF - 4.27MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 2023**Date Published:** November 2023

**Prepared by:**Omar S. Al-Yahia*, Matthew Bernard**, Ivor Clifford*, Grégory Perret*, Stephen Bajorek**, HakimFerroukhi**Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Reactor Physics and Thermal-Hydraulics5232 Villigen PSISwitzerland**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001USA K.Tien, NRC Project Manager 

Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Reflood conditions exhibit complex two-phase flows in fuel assemblies featuring spacer grids. Spacer grids can shatter or split dispersed droplets thereby significantly reducing their diameters, increasing the local heat and mass interfacial transfer, and reducing peak cladding temperature (PCT). The diameter of dispersed droplets downstream of a spacer grid has been shown to be dependent on the Weber number of the incoming droplets and the spacer grid blockage ratio. In this work, a spacer grid droplet breakup model based on the droplet Weber number is implemented into the new three-field version of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s TRACE code. The selected droplet break-up model can capture interfacial heat transfer enhancement observed in experimental data and is applicable to both mixing vane and egg-crate style spacer grids. The effect of the droplet breakup model on the three-field version of TRACE is assessed against recent RBHT (Rod Bundle Heat Transfer) experiments, for which TRACE was shown to overpredict the PCT for different initial and boundary conditions. When comparing the predictions of the base capability of TRACE and the three-field code with and without the spacer grid model, the new breakup model reduced the PCT predicted by TRACE by more than 100 K, which resulted in better-predicted PCTs and quenching times for the condition assessed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, December 04, 2023
#### Fraternal Order of Eagles and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellants : *Irving P. Mehigan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *James E. Finnegan,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# L_2016087EN.01003501.xml

| 2.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 29 December 2015
  )

On page 109, ‘TABLE OF CONTENTS’, ‘TITLE II’:

| ‘ANNEX 22-13 | Invoice declaration | 514’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘ANNEX 22-13

Invoice declaration

514’

is deleted;

on page 514, Annex 22-13 is deleted in its entirety.

---
| Subsidiary                                          |   | State      of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| NetLogic      Microsystems, Inc.                    |   | Delaware                                          |
| NetLogic      Microsystems International Limited    |   | British      Virgin Islands                       |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Caymans Limited          |   | Cayman      Islands                               |
| NetLogic      Microsystems LLC                      |   | Delaware                                          |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Europe Limited           |   | United      Kingdom                               |
| NetLogic      Microsystems (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.      |   | China                                             |
| NetLogic      Asia Limited                          |   | Hong      Kong                                    |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Europe SAS               |   | France                                            |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Asia HK Limited          |   | Hong      Kong                                    |
| NetLogic      Microsystems International HK Limited |   | Hong      Kong                                    |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Japan, K.K               |   | Japan                                             |
| NetLogic      Microsystems Korea, Inc.              |   | Korea                                             |
| NetLogic      Semiconductor Private Limited         |   | India                                             |
| NetLogic      Processors India Private Limited      |   | India                                             |
| RMI      International Caymans Limited              |   | Cayman      Islands                               |
| RMI      Technologies (Beijing) Limited             |   | China                                             |
| RMI      Technologies (Shanghai) Limited            |   | China                                             |
| RMI      Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited            |   | China                                             |
| Roadster,      LLC                                  |   | Delaware                                          |
| Aeluros,      Inc.                                  |   | Delaware                                          |
| Lara      Networks, Inc.                            |   | Delaware                                          |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2041 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to carry out a grant program for employers 

to develop and carry out job training programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. LOEBSACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to carry out a grant program for employers to develop and carry out job training 

programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Jobs Training 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—From the amounts ap8 propriated to carry out this Act, the Secretary of Labor, 

9 in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2041 IH

1 award grants to employers to carry out the activities de2 scribed in subsection (b). 

3 (b) USES OF FUNDS.—An employer that receives a 

4 grant under this section shall use such funds to partner 

5 with a community college to create a job training program 

6 for the purpose of training individuals for new jobs with 

7 the employer. 

8 (c) APPLICATION.—An employer that desires to re9 ceive a grant under this section shall submit an application 

10 to the Secretary of Labor at such time, in such manner, 

11 and containing such information as the Secretary may re12 quire, which shall include— 

13 (1) a description of the job training program 

14 that the employer seeks to develop and carry out 

15 using the grant; 

16 (2) the community college with which the em17 ployer plans to partner in developing and carrying 

18 out such job training program; and 

19 (3) the number of new jobs the employer seeks 

20 to create as a result of such job training program. 

21 (d) DEFINITIONS.— 

22 (1) COMMUNITY COLLEGE.—The term ‘‘commu23 nity college’’ has the meaning given the term ‘‘junior 

24 or community college’’ in section 312 of the Higher 

25 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1058). 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2041 IH

1 (2) NEW JOB.—The term ‘‘new job’’, when used 

2 with respect to an employer, means a job that— 

3 (A) may include a new position within an 

4 existing job category, and is not a job of a re5 called worker, a replacement job, or any other 

6 job that existed in the employer’s business with7 in the 1-year period preceding the date of hire; 

8 (B) is not a job that existed in a business 

9 operation or substantially similar business oper10 ation of the employer formerly located in an11 other location which was closed or substantially 

12 reduced by the employer; and 

13 (C) results in a net increase in employment 

14 for the employer. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
        23.1
 
 
 Consent
        of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
        Firm
 
 
 We
        have
        issued our report dated February 16, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
        financial statements included in the Annual Report of Zones, Inc. on Form
        10-K
        for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation
        by
        reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Zones, Inc. on
        Form
        S-8 (File Nos. 333-87255, 333-110750, and 333-114945).
 
  Grant
        Thornton, LLP
 Seattle,
        Washington
 February
        27, 2007
# C_2004118EN.01002901.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/29

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Grand Chamber)

of 12 March 2004

in Case C-54/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien): Austroplant-Arzneimittel GmbH v Republik Österreich (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 104(5) of the Rules of Procedure - Request for the national court to provide clarification - Inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling)

(2004/C 118/52)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-54/03: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien (Austria), seeking to obtain, in the proceedings pending before that court between Austroplant-Arzneimittel GmbH and Republik Österreich, a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinaI products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 8) – the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and A. Rosas, Presidents of Chambers, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges, made an order on 12 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The request for a preliminary ruling by the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien, by order of 29 January 2003, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 112 of 10. 5. 2003.

1

---