alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004244EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 September 2004

(2004/C 244/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2409 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4416 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6868 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0588 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5524 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,85 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,341 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5756 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,66 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 247,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6677 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4289 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3797 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 135 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,98 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,055 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 863 600 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7212 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,574 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8414 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0937 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 429,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9792 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2409

JPY

Japanese yen

137,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4416

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6868

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0588

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5524

ISK

Iceland króna

87,85

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,341

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5756

CZK

Czech koruna

31,66

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

247,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6677

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4289

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3797

ROL

Romanian leu

41 135

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,98

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,055

TRL

Turkish lira

1 863 600

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7212

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,574

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8414

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0937

KRW

South Korean won

1 429,39

ZAR

South African rand

7,9792

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7173** 

DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden; STEVE HOLLAR, Assistant Warden; TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Pro gram Supervisor; LIEUTENANT PERRY; SERGEANT STICKLER, C/O; WORKMAN, C/O; GRIFFIN, C/O; JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations; LIEUTENANT CANTERBURY; PHYLLIS BYRD, Law Library Supervisor , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Ap peal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv - 00139

- JLK )

Submitted : January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Cir cuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) action. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion. See Cienna Corp. v. Jarr ard , 203 F.3d 312, 322 (4th Cir. 2000) (providing review standard)

. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Lacey v. Braxton , No. 7:10

- cv - 00139

- JLK (W.D. Va. Aug.
1, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2015331EN.01002801.xml

| 17.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/28

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/2360

of 16 December 2015

appointing a Greek member and a Greek alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Greek Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | On 10 December 2015, a member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis of which Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS (politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Maroussi) was proposed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 10 December 2015, a member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis of which Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS (politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Maroussi) was proposed.

| (3) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Panagiotis KATSIVELAS, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Panagiotis KATSIVELAS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS, Politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Palaio Faliro (change of mandate); |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS, Politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Palaio Faliro (change of mandate);

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Georgios PATOULIS, Mayor of Maroussi, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Georgios PATOULIS, Mayor of Maroussi,

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

For the Council

The President

C. DIESCHBOURG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
# C_2004179EN.01000402.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/4

---

Action brought on 29 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-195/04)

(2004/C 179/08)

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 29 April 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Wiedner and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC, since Senaatti-kiinteistöt, when procuring institutional kitchen equipment, infringed fundamental provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular the principle of non-discrimination, which includes the obligation of publicity, and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC, since Senaatti-kiinteistöt, when procuring institutional kitchen equipment, infringed fundamental provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular the principle of non-discrimination, which includes the obligation of publicity, and

| 2. | Order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Although the Community directives concerning public procurement do not apply to contracts whose value is less than their threshold of application, fundamental provisions of the EC Treaty must be complied with, in particular the principle of non-discrimination, which includes the obligation of publicity.

The Court of Justice has held that, even though certain contracts concerning public procurement are outside the scope of the procurement directives, the procurement authorities which conclude them must nevertheless comply with the fundamental provisions of the Treaty. Even though the Community legislature considered that the detailed procedures laid down in the directives concerning public procurement are not regarded as applicable to public contracts below the threshold values in accordance with those provisions, that alone does not mean, however, that such procurement contracts do not fall within the scope of Community law.

The case-law clearly shows that a procurement must be made public to a reasonable extent and that that obligation of publicity must be complied with even in the case of contracts whose estimated values are below the threshold of application of the EC procurement directives.

---
#### In re COVE PATIO CORP., Debtor. Daniel L. BAKST, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Henry W. & Barbara J. SCHILLING and Mary Child’s Corp., Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 81-02152-BKC-TCB.

Adv. No. 82-0170-BKC-TCB-A.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

April 23, 1982.

Margaret Cangilos, Miami, Fla., for trustee.

Raymond B. Ray, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for Mary Child’s Corp.

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AS TO MARY CHILD’S CORP.

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The trustee’s complaint seeks the avoidance under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) of a preferential transfer made by the debtor in July, *8441981, to Mary Child’s Corp., in the amount of $28,000.

This bankruptcy case was filed on December 28, 1981, clearly more than 90 days after the alleged transfer and the corporation is admittedly not an insider within the purview of § 547(b)(4)(B). Therefore, the transfer to Mary Child’s Corp. is not avoidable under § 547. The trustee readily concedes this point.

The trustee has alleged that the transfer was made to the corporation by the debtor for the benefit of the defendants, H. W. Schilling, Jr., and his wife, Barbara Schilling, who are alleged to have been insiders. The trustee can, therefore, attempt recovery of the preference from the Schillings if he can prove his allegations.

The trustee, concerned as to his ability to effect recovery from the Schillings, has joined Mary Child’s Corp. as a defendant and seeks recovery from the corporation under § 550(a)(1), which provides that:

> “. . . to the extent that a transfer is avoided under section . . . 547 ... of this title, the trustee may recover, for the benefit of the estate, the property transferred, or, if the court so orders, the value of such property, from (1) *the initial transferee of such transfer*or the entity for whose benefit such transfer was made.”

There is no allegation nor suggestion that Mary Child’s Corp. was anything other than a good faith transferee. The corporation was not acting in concert with the Schillings, but it was, literally, “the initial transferee of such transfer”.

The trustee urges that the quoted provision be applied literally, without regard to the obvious purpose of the statutory provision, in such a way as to, possibly, permit the recovery of a preference which admittedly would not be recoverable under § 547. I disagree. Section 550(a)(1) was not intended to expand the trustee’s right to recover preferences as provided in § 547, but was intended only to facilitate his recovery of transfers avoidable under § 547, regardless of whether the transfer was effected through a number of parties or effected indirectly for the benefit of the party who actually benefited from the preference. The foregoing conclusion is expressed in 4 *Collier on Bankruptcy*(15th ed.) ¶ 550.02 and has been approved, in the form of dicta, by at least one colleague. *In re Church Buildings and Interiors, Inc.*(Bkrtcy.W.D.Okla.1981), 14 B.R. 128, 131, 5 C.B.C.2d 74, 78.

Mary Child’s Corp. has moved for dismissal of the complaint as to it. (C.P. No. 15). The motion was heard on April 20. It is granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.I.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                           EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION
                            SENIOR EXECUTIVE SURVIVOR
                                  BENEFIT PLAN

         Pursuant to Section 7.5 of the El Paso Energy Corporation Senior
Executive Survivor Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated effective as of August 1,
1998 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective February 7,
2001:

         WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation of El Paso Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was amended to change the name of the
corporation to El Paso Corporation effective February 7, 2001.

         NOW THEREFORE, the name of the Plan is hereby changed to the "El Paso
Corporation Senior Executive Survivor Benefit Plan" and all references in the
Plan to "El Paso Energy Corporation" or the "Company" shall mean "El Paso
Corporation."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 7th day of February 2001.


                                       EL PASO CORPORATION

                                       By:      /s/ Joel Richards III
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Human Resources and Administration


Attest:

    /s/ David L. Siddall
-----------------------------
    Corporate Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Amendment.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration is amending the Notice published at 79 FR 34287, June 16, 2014, for the education mission to El Salvador and Honduras, with an optional stop in Nicaragua, from March 16-19, 2015, to revise the number of participants from 15 to 20.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Amendment to Revise the Number of Participants.

## Background

This is the International Trade Administration Education Team's first trade mission to Central America, and the response has been robust. With this high level of interest, it has been determined that five (5) additional participants can be accommodated in the destination countries, raising the maximum number to 20.

## Amendments

For the reasons stated above, the Participation Requirements section, third sentence, is amended to state “The mission will open on a rolling basis to a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 20 appropriately accredited U.S. educational institutions.”

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        U.S. Export Assistance Center Silicon Valley, Gabriela Zelaya, International Trade Specialist, Tel: 408-535-2757, ext. 107, Email:                         *gabriela.zelaya@trade.gov.*

                        Laura Gimenez, Commercial Officer, El Salvador, Tel: (011-503) 2501-3221, Email:                         *laura.gimenez@trade.gov.*

                        Aileen Nandi, Commercial Officer, El Salvador, Tel: (408) 535-2757, ext. 102, Email:                         *aileen.nandi@trade.gov.*

                        U.S. Export Assistance Center Lexington,  Sara Moreno, International Trade Specialist, Tel: 859-225-7001, Email:                         *sara.moreno@trade.gov.*

Frank Spector,

International Trade Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2015-01631 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-FP-P
# C_2004195EN.01000602.xml

| 31.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3438 — PUTNAM/UNION INVESTMENT/UNION PANAGORA)

(2004/C 195/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3438. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3438. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
# C_2004262EN.01000402.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 7 September 2004

in Case C-319/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus): Petri Manninen (1)

1

(Income tax - Tax credit for dividends paid by Finnish companies - Articles 56 EC and 58 EC - Cohesion of the tax system)

(2004/C 262/07)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-319/92: Reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court by order of 10 September 2002, which arrived at the Court on 12 September 2002, in the proceedings brought by Petri Manninen — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Presidents of Chambers, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 7 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC preclude legislation whereby the entitlement of a person fully taxable in one Member State to a tax credit in relation to dividends paid to him by limited companies is excluded where those companies are not established in that State.

---

(1)  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 15



The Partners
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP:



RE: Registration Statement No. 333-04695, 333-26845, 333-49911 and 333-37920

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statement,  we
acknowledge  our awareness of the use therein of  our  report
dated  October  25,  2000 related to our  review  of  interim
financial information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act  of  1933,
such  report  is  not  considered a part  of  a  registration
statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning  of
sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
November 10, 2000
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARIA MARTINEZ a/k/a MARIA B. MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

ALS IV, LLC ; Unknown Spouse of Maria B. Martinez a/k/a Maria Martinez; Any And All Unknown Parties Claiming By, Through, Under And Against The Herein Names Individual Defendant(s) Who Are Not Known To Be Dead Or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim

An Interest As Spouses, Heirs, Devises, Grantees, Or Other Claimants;

CLERK OF THE COURT P ALM BEACH COUNTY, FL ORIDA ; THE

INDEPENDENT SAVINGS PLAN COMPANY d/b/a ISPC; ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC ; PALM BEACH COUNTY, F LORIDA ; STATE OF FLORIDA DEP ARTMENT OF REVENUE ; FI RST SELECT,

INC. , Unknown Tenant #1 In Possession Of The Property; Unknown

Tenant #2 In Possession of the Property

,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 13

- 3578

[ April 8, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Roger B. Colton , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CA013536

.

Brian Korte of Korte and Wortman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Heidi J. Bassett of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee

- ALS IV, LLC.

P ER C URIAM

.

Maria B. Martinez appeal s from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of ALS IV, LLC (“ALS”). We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, but reverse the award of attorney’s fees because ALS failed to present sufficient evidence to support the award. We reverse and re mand the attorney’s fee order for additional findings, or an additional hearing, if

necessary. See Rodriguez v. Campbell , 720 So. 2d 266, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that when the party seeking attorney’s fees presents some competent substantial evid ence supporting the fee, yet fails to include2

some essential evidentiary support, the appellate court will reverse and remand the order for additional findings).

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and R emanded for further proceedings

.

S TEVENSON

, T

AYLOR and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.