alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 11.2**

**DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS**

**(in thousands)**

 
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **Three Months**         | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **Ended March 31, 2005** | ** ** |
| Net income from continuing operations, less preferred distributions |       | $                        | 24,059     |   |
| Earnings from sale of land, net of impairment adjustments           |       | (143                     | )          |
| Recurring principal amortization                                    |       | 1,697                    |       |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | 33,682                   |       |
| Earnings before debt service                                        |       | $                        | 59,295     |   |
| Interest expense (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | $                        | 33,682     |   |
| Recurring principal amortization                                    |       | 1,697                    |       |
| Total debt service                                                  |       | $                        | 35,379     |   |
| **Ratio of earnings to debt service**                               | ** ** | **1.68**                 | ** ** |

 

----
No: 19-057 November 5, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Imposes $43,500 Civil Penalty on New York Firm

for Unlicensed Importation and Distribution of Radioactive Material

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has imposed a $43,500 civil penalty on Dead Ringer LLC 

of Rochester, N.Y., for importing and distributing radioactive material without proper licenses.

An NRC investigation in 2017 established that Dead Ringer was selling gun sights containing 

radioactive material (tritium) without proper licenses, beginning in January 2015. While consumers 

do not need a license to possess such gun sights, a company that distributes them is required to have 

an exempt distribution license from the NRC and to register the sealed source and device. An 

exempt distribution license authorizes distribution to unlicensed wholesalers or retailers. The 

company was also required to have a license from the State of New York to possess radioactive 

material.

Dead Ringer informed the NRC in December 2017 that it had stopped distributing the gun 

sights. Subsequent NRC investigations determined that the sights remained available online through 

Dead Ringer’s official store on Amazon.com. The investigation determined that company officials 

willfully continued to sell the gun sights without seeking the licenses to avoid paying licensing fees.

The order imposing the penalty was issued Oct. 22. The company has 20 days from that date to 

pay the civil penalty or request an adjudicatory hearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,David L. Grange, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: August 7, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; new meeting location.

# SUMMARY:

                        The hotel listed for the Inland Waterways Users Board meeting scheduled on February 25, 2015 that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Wednesday, January 21, 2015 (80 FR 2921) has changed. The Board meeting will now be held at the Hampton Inn and Suites Birmingham-Downtown-Tutwiler, 2012 Park Place, Birmingham, AL 35203.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Mark R. Pointon, the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for the committee, in writing at the Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CEIWR-GM, 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Alexandria, VA 22315-3868; by telephone at 703-428-6438; and by email at                         *Mark.Pointon@usace.army.mil.*                         Alternatively, contact Mr. Kenneth E. Lichtman, the Alternate Designated Federal Officer (ADFO), in writing at the Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CEIWR-GW, 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Alexandria, VA 22315-3868; by telephone at 703-428-8083; and by email at                         *Kenneth.E.Lichtman@usace.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01910 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2080 

To provide that the management plan entitled ‘‘Eastern Interior Proposed 

Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement’’ 

shall have no force or effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide that the management plan entitled ‘‘Eastern Interior Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement’’ shall have no force or 

effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eastern Interior Alas5 ka Land Use Protection Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2080 IH

1 SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT 

2 PLAN. 

3 The management plan entitled ‘‘Eastern Interior 

4 Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environ5 mental Impact Statement’’, for which notice of availability 

6 was published in the Federal Register on July 29, 2016 

7 (81 Fed. Reg. 50009), shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
# Field Border (Ac.) (386) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Field Border (Ac.) (386) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Field Border (Ac.) (386).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Field Border (Ac.) (386) (9/16) Standard Document(133.89 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Field Border (Ac.) (386) Overview(241.06 KB)

Field Border (Ac.) (386) CPPE(26 KB)

Field Border (Ac.) (386) Network Diagram(135.92 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Field Border

This video explores how Tupper Dorsey implemented this conservation practice on his grain farm in Berryville, Virginia.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Composting Facility, Critical Area Planting, Dike, Diversion, Pond Sealing or Lining, Bentonite Sealant, Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment, Pond Sealing or Lining, Flexible Membrane, Pond Sealing or Lining, Soil Dispersant, Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
# C_2004195EN.01000101.xml

| 31.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 July 2004

(2004/C 195/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2039 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4357 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66255 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2357 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5414 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,57980 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,693 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6545 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4249 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3916 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 125 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,9800 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,045 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 769 700 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7165 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5921 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3902 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8917 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0732 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 408,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5194 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2039

JPY

Japanese yen

134,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4357

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66255

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2357

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5414

ISK

Iceland króna

86,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,57980

CZK

Czech koruna

31,693

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6545

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4249

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3916

ROL

Romanian leu

41 125

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,9800

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,045

TRL

Turkish lira

1 769 700

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7165

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5921

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3902

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8917

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0732

KRW

South Korean won

1 408,74

ZAR

South African rand

7,5194

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### City of Milwaukee, Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, imp., Respondent.

*September 23*

October *19, 1920.*

*Appeal: Public utilities: Order requiring that complaint be made definite and certain.*

In an *action to set*aside an order of the railroad commission fixing- rates, an order- requiring the complaint to be made more definite and certain is not appealable under sec. 3069, Stats., notwithstanding sub, (d), sec. 1797 — 16, providing *437that either party, in an action to review a determination of the commission, may appeal to the supreme court within sixty days after the service of a copy of an order or judgment of the circuit court, since said section refers to an order or judgment on the merits.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*Dismissed.*

Plaintiff brought an action to set aside an order of the railroad commission fixing street-car fares in Milwaukee, alleging that the rate of fare fixed was unlawful. The *Mihvaukee Electric Railway & Light Company,*a defendant, moved the court that plaintiff be required to make its complaint more definite and certain. An order was entered granting the motion, and from such order the plaintiff appealed.

' For the appellant there was a brief by *Clifton Williams,*city attorney, and *Joseph L. Bednarek,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Bednarek.*

For "the respondent there was a brief by *Miller, Mack & Fairchild*and *Van Dyke, Shazv, Muskat & Van Dyke,*and oral argument by *George B. Luhman,*all of Milwaukee.

Vinje, J.

The defendant company’s contention that the order is not appeal-able under sec. 3069, Stats., is well taken. *State ex rel. Schumacher v. Markham,*162 Wis. 55, 155 N. W. 917. Plaintiff concedes this, but claims that the order is made appealable by sub. (d), sec. 1797 — 16, Stats., which provides that “Either party to said action” (namely, an action to set aside an order or judgment of the commission), “within sixty days after service of a copy of the order or judgment of the circuit court, may appeal to the supreme court.” It is clear that the order or judgment referred to in the section quoted means an order or judgment on the merits of the action and not a mere interlocutory order relating to practice. That such is the proper construction is made certain by the language of sec. 1797- — 17, providing that in *438such actions the practice and rules of evidence shall be the same as in civil actions except as otherwise provided.

*By the Court.-*— Appeal dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Using TRACE, MELCOR, CFD, and FRAPTRAN to Establish the Analysis Methodology for Chinshan Nuclear Power Plant Spent Fuel Pool (NUREG/IA-0482)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0482 (PDF – 1.62 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2017**Date Published:** October 2018

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Chunkuan Shih, Shao-Wen Chen, Yung-Shin Tseng, Yu Chiang, Wan-Yun Li, Jung-Hua Yang, Hsiung-Chih Chen, Show-Chyuan Chiang*, Tzu-Yao Yu*

Nuclear and New Energy Education and Research Foundation; Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., HsinChu, Taiwan

*Department of Nuclear Safety, Taiwan Power Company 242, Section 3, Roosevelt Rd., Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Chinshan nuclear power plant (NPP) is the first plant in Taiwan and is a BWR/4 plant. People have more concern for the NPPs safety in Taiwan after Fukushima NPP disaster happened. Hence, we established the analysis methodology and performed the safety analysis of Chinshan NPP SFP (spent fuel pool) by using TRACE, MELCOR, CFD, and FRAPTRAN codes. There were two steps in this study. The first step was the establishment of Chinshan NPP SFP models by using TRACE, MELCOR, and CFD. Then, under the SFP cooling system failure condition (Fukushima-like accident), the transient analysis was performed. Additionally, the sensitive study of the time point for water spray was also performed. The next step was the analysis of the fuel rod performance by using FRAPTRAN and TRACE analysis results. Finally, the animation model of Chinshan NPP SFP was presented by using the SNAP animation function with MELCOR's results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# CA2004137EN.01000502.xml

| 15.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 137/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 137/5

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director (grade A2) in DG Trade (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/086/04

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004

(2004/C 137 A/10)

Page 40: Closing Date

Closing Date

For:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 14 May 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

14 May 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 14 May 2004.’

14 May 2004

Read:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 1 June 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

1 June 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 1 June 2004.’

1 June 2004

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000186 30-APR-2015 08:11 AM
# L_2015147EN.01002402.xml

| 12.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 147/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 147/24

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/608 of 14 April 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards the entries for Ukraine and Israel in the list of third countries, the approval of the control programme of Ukraine for Salmonella in laying hens, the veterinary certification requirements concerning Newcastle disease and processing requirements for egg products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 101 of 18 April 2015
  )

On page 20, model veterinary certificate DOC, point II.2.1, third paragraph:

for:

‘For reasons other than the Salmonella control programme, within the last three weeks prior to import:’,

read:

‘For reasons other than the Salmonella control programme:’.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Development and Verification of Fire Tests for Cable Systems and System Components: Quarterly Report 12, March – May 1980 (NUREG/CR-1552, UL-USNC-75-Q)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-1552 (PDF - 784 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1980****Date Published:****September 1980

**Prepared by:** L.J. Przybyla, W.J. Christian Underwriters Laboratories Inc. 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, IL 60062

**Prepared for:** Division of Reactor Safety Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Under NRC Contract No. NRC-04-77-122

NRC FIN B-6197

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Experiments were conducted to study the effects of a forced ventilation on the results of the IEEE 383 flame test for tray cables. Three sets of experiments were conducted on three types of cables. The first set was a control in which cable samples were tested in a free-convection environment within an 8 x 8 x 8 ft (2.44 x 2.44 x 2.44 m) enclosure. In the second set, the cable samples were tested within an enclosure with a 1500 CFM (708 l/s) forced ventilation. In the third set, the cable samples were tested within an enclosure with the ventilation rate of either 1200 CFM (566 l/s) or 1800 CFM (849 l/s). The results showed that the rate of flame propagation and the maximum cable damage were not affected when the enclosure and forced ventilation were used. It is recommended that the test method be revised to specify the use of an enclosure and forced ventilation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 11
                            TREX MEDICAL CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share

                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      December 28, December 30,
                                                              1996         1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computation of Primary Earnings per Share:

Net Income (a)                                         $ 3,286,000  $ 1,626,000
                                                       -----------  -----------

Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding                   28,625,597   20,843,327

  Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise of
       options (as determined by the application
       of the treasury stock method)                             -      151,414
                                                       -----------  -----------

  Weighted average shares outstanding,
    as adjusted (b)                                     28,625,597   20,994,741
                                                       -----------  -----------

Primary Earnings per Share (a) / (b)                   $       .11  $       .08
                                                       ===========  ===========
# CA2004137EN.01000501.xml

| 15.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 137/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 137/5

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director (grade A2) in DG Eurostat (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/085/04

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 16 April 2004

(2004/C 137 A/09)

Cover Page, Section III Notices, Item 2004/C 92 A/09

For:

‘DG Eurostat Publication of a vacancy for Deputy Director-General (grade A2) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/085/04’

Read:

‘DG Eurostat Publication of a vacancy for a Director (grade A2) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/085/04’

Page 33, 2nd line of Title

nd

For:

‘Publication of a vacancy for Deputy Director-General’

Read:

‘Publication of a vacancy for a Director’

Page 36: Closing Date

Closing Date

For:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 14 May 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

14 May 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 14 May 2004.’

14 May 2004

Read:

‘Applications must be sent on or before 1 June 2004 (date of e-mail or date as postmark for registered mail).

1 June 2004

Applications sent by express courier service must be delivered to the address above before 17.00 on 1 June 2004.’

1 June 2004

---