alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# User’s Guide for RESRAD-OFFSITE (NUREG/CR-7189)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7189 (PDF - 6.91 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2014**Date Published:** April 2015

**Prepared by:** E. K. Gnanapragasam C. Yu

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

M. Fuhrmann, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code V6467

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The RESRAD-OFFSITE code can be used to model the radiological dose or risk to an offsite receptor. This *User’s Guide for RESRAD-OFFSITE Version 3.1* is an update of the *User’s Guide for RESRAD-OFFSITE Version 2* contained in the Appendix A of the *User’s Manual for RESRAD-OFFSITE Version 2* (ANL/EVS/TM/07-1, DOE/HS-0005, NUREG/CR-6937). This user’s guide presents the basic information necessary to use Version 3.1 of the code. It also points to the help file and other documents that provide more detailed information about the inputs, the input forms and features/tools in the code; two of the features (overriding the source term and computing area factors) are discussed in the appendices to this guide.

Section 2 describes how to download and install the code and then verify the installation of the code. Section 3 shows ways to navigate through the input screens to simulate various exposure scenarios and to view the results in graphics and text reports. Section 4 has screen shots of each input form in the code and provides basic information about each parameter to increase the user’s understanding of the code. Section 5 outlines the contents of all the text reports and the graphical output. It also describes the commands in the two output viewers. Section 6 deals with the probabilistic and sensitivity analysis tools available in the code. Section 7 details the various ways of obtaining help in the code.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Knowledge Base for Post-Fire Safe-Shutdown Analysis - Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-1778)

This NUREG publication was issued for public comment, and the comment period is now closed.

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1778, Draft Report for Comment (PDF - 1.81 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2003**Date Published:**January 2004

**Prepared by:** M.H. Salley

S.D. Weerakkody, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Safety and Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Every operating nuclear power plant is required to have a program that demonstrates the capability to safely shut down and maintain the reactor in the event of a fire. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initially issued its requirements in the Fire Protection Rule set forth in Title 10, Section 50.48, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50.48) and Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50. The NRC has since issued numerous related generic communications over the past 20 years. The purpose of this document is to facilitate understanding of this technically challenging process and the regulatory framework upon which it is based by compiling all essential information in a single source. This document also lays the groundwork for future risk-informed activities in the post-fire safe-shutdown area.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ENRIQUEZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00323-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20110D04189)

O R D E R

The Court has considered the agreed motion to consolidate, and concludes the motion 

should be GRANTED. The above styled and numbered cause shall be consolidated with cause 

number’s 08-15-00322-CR, 08-15-00324-CR, and 08-15-00325-CR, Styled Jose Angel Enriquez 

v. The State of Texas, for purposes briefing and oral argument only

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### Matthews and another, Respondents, vs. Scannell, Appellant.

*March 6*

April *1, 1930.*

*382The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Reynolds & Dwyer*of Green Bay, and for the respondents on that of *Lee H. Cranston*of Green Bay.

Rosenberry, C. J.

Except for the question raised in regard to the nature of defendant’s liability, we should affirm this judgment without opinion under the rule. The defendant contends that the plaintiffs may not recover because the rabbits are not enumerated in sec. 174.02 of the Statutes, which is as follows:

“The owner or keeper of any dog which shall have injured or caused the injury of any person or property or killed, wounded or worried any horses, cattle, sheep or lambs shall be liable to the person so injured and the owner of such animals for all damages so done, without proving notice to the owner or keeper of such dog or knowledge by him that his dog was mischievous or disposed to kill, wound or worry horses, cattle, sheep or lambs.”

The statute was intended to change the rule of the common law requiring proof of scienter. A claimant does not need to prove the keeper had knowledge of the vicious propensities of the animal in the cases falling within the statute. The statute also makes the keeper as well as the owner liable.

The complaint alleges a trespass by the dog and the killing .of the rabbits by way of aggravation of the damage. The case of *Chunot v. Larson,*43 Wis. 536, adopted the rule that where a dog while trespassing upon the property of another does damage, the owner is liable for the injury though he had no previous knowledge of any vicious.propensity of the dog. Such is the rule in many states, among others, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, and Vermont. Sec cases cited in 3 Corp. Jur. p. 94, note 82, Proof of *383scienter is not required at common law where the injury results from the natural propensity of the trespassing animal. See *Lyons v. Merrick,*105 Mass. *71; Goodman v. Gay,*15 Pa. St. 188; 3 Corp. Jur. p. 95, § 326, cases cited and notes.

In other cases proof of scienter is held necessary because the owner has no reason to anticipate that the animal will do injury. The owner is liable for the injury done by animals acting from natural propensities without proof of scienter.

To require proof that a dog might kill rabbits would be to require proof of the most natural trait of the animal. In this case the dog was found in the hutch, which he could have entered only by going through a trap door, so there is no question about the matter of trespass, and under the decisions cited the defendant was liable for the resulting damage. The killing of the rabbits merely enhanced the damages. While the verdict seems high, it is supported by the evidence.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed. •
# L_2016267EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/1

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 341 of 24 December 2015
  )

On pages 88 and 89, Article 4, second paragraph:

for:

‘The following points of Article 1 of this Regulation shall apply from 1 October 2017:

points (8); (18); ... (132); ...’,

read:

‘The following points of Article 1 of this Regulation shall apply from 1 October 2017:

points (8); (18) with the exception of paragraph 5b of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009; ... (132) with the exception of paragraph 3 of Article 154a of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009; ...’;

On page 89, Article 4, third paragraph, first sentence:

for:

‘... 12 months following the date specified in the second paragraph of this Article, ...’,

read:

‘... 12 months following the date specified in the first paragraph of this Article, ...’.

---
# L_2015260EN.01002701.xml

| 7.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 260/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 260/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1791

of 5 October 2015

appointing an Italian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

1

2

3

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Onofrio INTRONA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Onofrio INTRONA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Roberto CIAMBETTI, Consigliere e Presidente del Consiglio regionale della Regione Veneto |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Roberto CIAMBETTI, Consigliere e Presidente del Consiglio regionale della Regione Veneto

Consigliere e Presidente del Consiglio regionale della Regione Veneto

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 5 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

N. SCHMIT

---

(1)  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
# Local Work Group Meeting- Potomac Valley Conservation District

      Farm Credit Building,        550 South Main Street,          Moorefiled,        WV        26836  

West Virginia

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Events 
-  Local Work Group Meeting- Potomac Valley Conservation District 

The Potomac Valley Conservation District in cooperation with USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will hold a local work group meeting to discuss conservation programs and provide guidance for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). 

## Registration

For more information contact Sarah Taylor-Goldizen at 304-703-8624 or Lee Haggerty at 304-822-3020 ext. 101.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20613

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL IVAN CAVAZOS-AGUIRRE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-52-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Ivan Cavazos-Aguirre has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Cavazos-Aguirre has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20613 Document: 00511640307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 10-20613

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-20613 Document: 00511640307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PAINCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PainCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randy Lubinsky, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark Szporka, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                     
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer



Date: August 15, 2005





|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Szporka                                    
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer



Date: August 15, 2005
Exhibit 10.21
 NETEZZA CORPORATION   Executive Retention Agreement
     Key Definitions
  Change in Control
 provided




---



##### 



provided however
  Change in Control Date
 2




---



##### 



Cause
    Good Reason
     Disability
 3




---



##### 



Term of Agreement
 Employment Status; Notice of Termination of Employment
 Not an Employment Contract
 Notice of Termination of Employment Following a Change in Control.
   4




---



##### 



Benefits to Executive
 Severance Benefits
  th
  Resignation without Good Reason; Termination for Cause or for Death or Disability
 Stock Acceleration
 5




---



##### 



Taxes
      6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



Payments Subject to Section 409A
      8




---



##### 



Exclusive Severance Benefits
 Mitigation
 Release
 9




---



##### 



th
 Disputes
 Settlement of Disputes; Arbitration
 Expenses
 Successors
 Successor to Company
 Successor to Executive
 Notice
 10




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Employment by Subsidiary
 Severability
 Governing Law
 Waivers
 Counterparts
 Tax Withholding
 Entire Agreement
 11




---



##### 



Amendments
 Executives Acknowledgements
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]
 12




---



##### 



NETEZZA CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ James BaumName:
    James BaumTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerDAVID R. FLAXMAN/s/ David R. FlaxmanAddress: 13
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                               JO-ANN STORES, INC.

                  LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE PARTIES TO
          THE SPLIT DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE REGISTRANT

-        Alan Rosskamm
-        David Bolen
-        Brian Carney
-        Rosalind Thompson


                                       85
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of VitaCube Systems Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnD. Pougnet, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/          *John D. Pougnet* |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John  D. Pougnet                                                                 |
| Chief  Financial Officer                                                         |
|                                                                             |
| March  31, 2006                                                                  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Precision Drilling Corporation on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Chief Executive
Officer of Precision Drilling Corporation, hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Precision Drilling Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                     |  | 
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: |  | March 13, 2015                                      |  | 
|       |  |                                                    
|By:    |  | /s/ Kevin Neveu                                     |  | 
|       |  | Kevin A. Neveu, President & Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|       |  | of Precision Drilling Corporation                   |  |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5194-5195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, Anchorage, 
Alaska.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Request for Public Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal to change approximately 40 
acres of airport land from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use at 
Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, Anchorage, Alaska. It is 
determined through study and master planning that the property will not 
be needed for aeronautical purposes for the foreseeable future as this 
portion of the parcel is not contiguous with the airport proper and is 
significantly geographically separated from the operational areas of 
the airport. A change to non-aeronautical use does not exclude 
aeronautical activities in this area in the future.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed or delivered to the FAA at the 
following address: Pat Oien, Alaskan Region Airports Division, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, #14, Anchorage, Alaska 
99513-7587 (phone 907-271-5445). In addition, one copy of the comment 
submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to: Teri Lindseth, 
Planning Manager, TSAIA, P.O. Box 196960, Anchorage, AK 99519-6960 
(phone 907-266-2544).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 
Section 47153(c), this notice is being published in the Federal 
Register 30 days before the DOT Secretary may waive any condition 
imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus property conveyance 
deeds.
    Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport was conveyed this 
property on April 22, 2014, from the Federal government for use as a 
public airport.

[[Page 5195]]

    Legal Description: Lot 6, Section 4, Township 12 North, Range 4 
West, Seward Meridian, State of Alaska.

    Issued in Anchorage, Alaska on January 26, 2015.
Byron K. Huffman,
Manager, Airports Division, Alaskan Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-01823 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Table 1: Radionuclides of Concern

Radionuclide Quantity of 

Concern1 (TBq) 

Quantity of 

Concern2 (Ci )

Am-241 0.6 16 

Am-241/Be 0.6 16 

Cf-252 0.2 5.4 

Cm-244 0.5 14 

Co-60 0.3 8.1 

Cs-137 1 27 

Gd-153 10 270 

Ir-192 0.8 22 

Pm-147 400 11,000 

Pu-238 0.6 16 

Pu-239/Be 0.6 16 

Ra-226 0.4 11 

Se-75 2 54 

Sr-90 (Y-90) 10 270 

Tm-170 200 5,400 

Yb-169 3 81 

Combinations of radioactive 

materials listed above3

See Footnote 

Below4

1

 The aggregate activity of multiple, collocated sources of the same radionuclide should be 

included when the total activity equals or exceeds the quantity of concern. 

2

 The primary values used for compliance with this Order are TBq. The curie (Ci) values are 

rounded to two significant figures for informational purposes only. 

3 Radioactive materials are to be considered aggregated or collocated if breaching a common 

physical security barrier (e.g., a locked door at the entrance to a storage room) would allow 

access to the radioactive material or devices containing the radioactive material. 

4

 If several radionuclides are aggregated, the sum of the ratios of the activity of each source, i of 

radionuclide, n, A(i,n), to the quantity of concern for radionuclide n, Q(n), listed for that radionuclide 

equals or exceeds one. [(aggregated source activity for radionuclide A) ÷ (quantity of concern for 

radionuclide A)] + [(aggregated source activity for radionuclide B) ÷ (quantity of concern for 

radionuclide B)] + etc..... >1
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Accenture Ltd: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-112854 and 333-104628) on Form S-3 and
(No. 333-65376) on Form S-8 of Accenture
Ltd of our report dated October 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Accenture Ltd as of August 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
August 31, 2004, which report appears in the August 31, 2004 annual report on
Form 10-K of Accenture Ltd. /s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois November 3, 2004