alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-01-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      961
<ALLOWANCES>                                        28
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    34
<PP&E>                                          26,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,367
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,003
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (52)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (52)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 1998

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# EWP Success Stories

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Programs & Initiatives 
-  Emergency Watershed Protection 
-  EWP Success Stories 

The Emergency Watershed Protection Program helps communities recover from natural disasters. The following success stories illustrate the agility of EWP to provide recovery assistance.

###   NRCS Floodplain Buyouts Offer Options for Flood Prone Lands in West Virginia

October 24, 2023

While beautiful, parts of West Virginia’s rugged landscape are especially flood prone. There are towns in these floodplains where residents are at risk of losing property, life savings, their lives due to flash floods.  

###   Relocating Homes From Severe Erosion

October 11, 2023

Native Community of Akiak, Alaska and Natural Resources Conservation Service work together to respond to severe erosion caused by **spring ice jams** and plan for the future.

###   Protecting Lives and Infrastructure from Erosion in McGrath

October 02, 2023

The City of McGrath, Alaska used the NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program to respond to**rapid erosion on the Kuskokwim River**.

###   EWP Provides a lifeline to Jasper County, TX

June 05, 2023

In intense storm with 60-mile an hour winds, fueled by Hurricane Laura, caused widespread flooding, downed power lines and debris that isolated rural communities in Jasper County. County commissioners worked with local NRCS EWP Program Managers to streamline recovery..

###   Tropical Storm Ida

October 03, 2022

Flooding from **Tropical Storm Ida** in September 2021 caused significant damage to waterways across Pennsylvania and Louisiana. Significant streambank erosion left homes and business at risk. Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding was used to provide recovery assistance.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  August  11, 2006By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ALFRED ROLAND and others *v.*JOSEPH THOMPSON and others.

T, a guardian, held a note against M for $6,000. In payment of this note, M conveyed to T 1,300 acres of land, and the note was credited with $6,000, the full value of the land. T afterwards conveyed 700 acres of the land to a trustee for the use and benefit of the children of the said M; and in an action brought by the said wards of T, to recover the 700 acres so conveyed in trust and without consideration: *It was held,*that as the land was conveyed to T in payment of the note belonging to his wards, his deed to the trustee in trust for M’s children was fraudulent, and that the wards of T were entitled to recover the land.

Civil actioN tried before *Kerr, J.*at Spring Term 1875, of the Superior Court of RobesoN county.

The facts necessary to an understanding of the case as decided in this Court are fully stated in the opinion of the Court, delivered by Chief Justice PearsoN.

Upon the trial below, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs; and thereupon the defendants appealed.

*N. A. McLean,*for the appellants.

*W.*McL. McKay, *Leitch, St/range*and *W. 8.*French, contra.

PeaesoN, C. J.

Thompson as guardian of plaintiffs, held a note on Moore for upwards of $6,000. In payment of this note, Moore conveys to Thompson 1,300 acres of land, and Thompson enters upon the note a credit for $6,000 whichyras the full value of the land.

Thompson executes a deed to a trustee for 7Q0 acres of the land for the use and benefit of the children of Moore. The action seeks to follow the fund in its converted form, and claims the 700 acres of land as having been bought and paid for with the money of plaintiffs.

Defendants say in reply to this equity, Moore executed the deed to Thompson, with an understanding that he was to convey the 700 acres to a trustee for Moore’s children, which was *420executed; rejoinder, the understanding being by parol was void, under the statute of frauds ; and in the second place, as Thompson paid for the land with the money of the plaintiffs, it was in equity, their land and he had no right to make a deed of gift for a part of it to the defendants. *They ¡paid nothing for the land,*and hold it subject to the equities by which it was bound in the hands of Thompson. They can take no benefit from the fact, that their father as a condition precedent to the payment of a debt, exacted a promise from Thompson to do a fraudulent act. Suffice it, the defendants have paid nothing for the land and the plaintiffs have paid its full value. No error.

Pee CubiaM.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,338
<INVENTORY>                                    107,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,367
<PP&E>                                         158,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,881
<BONDS>                                        144,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              221
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,106
<SALES>                                        187,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,353
<CGS>                                           93,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,978
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,042
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# NRC Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule (NUREG-0910, Revision 4)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0910, Revision 4 (PDF - 29.4 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2005**Date Published:**March 2005

Information and Records Services Division Office of Information Services U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Title 44 United States Code, 'Public Printing and Documents," regulations issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, Management and Use of Information and Records," and regulations Issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) In 36 CFR Chapter X11, Subchapter B. "Records Management," require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARAs General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration or retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 4, contains 'NRC's Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule," and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 4 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision and includes the lates transmittal from NARA, transmittal no. 26 dated September 2004.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15995-15996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06374]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9908-40-OCFO]

Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental 
Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will be renewed for an additional two-
year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, 
in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2. The purpose of EFAB is to provide advice and 
recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with 
environmental financing. It is determined that EFAB is in the public 
interest in connection with

[[Page 15996]]

the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.
    Inquiries may be directed to Vanessa Bowie, Staff Director, Center 
for Environmental Finance, U.S. EPA, William Jefferson Clinton Federal 
Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460 (Mailcode 
2731A), Telephone (202) 564-5186, or bowie.vanessa@epa.gov.

    Dated: March 12, 2014.
David Bloom,
Acting Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of the Chief Financial 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-06374 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### * HYMANS & DANCY v. ALANSON CAPEHART.

*Motion to set aside Judgment*— Excusable *Neglect.*

Where a defendant in a civil action wrote'to his regular attorney who lived in Northampton county, and notified him that he was summoned to appear at Fall Term, 1876, of Wayne Superior Court, but did not request him to attend to the case and took no further notice of it himself ; his attorney did not attend the Courts in Wayne or reply to defendant’s letter, but overlooked the matter; and judgment by default was regularly entered, of which the defendant had actual notice in Janúary, 1877 ;

*It was held,*that he was not entitled on a motion made in December, 1877, to have the judgment set aside on the ground of surprise, inadvertence or excusable neglect under C. C. P. § 133,

*(Griel*v. *Vernon,*65 N. C. 76; *Burke*v. *Stokely,*Ib. 569, cited, distin» guished and approved.)

Motion to set aside a judgment heard at Chambers, before *Seymour, J.*

The facts appear in the opinion. His Honor refused the motion and the defendant appealed.

*Messrs. G. M.*and *A. K. Smedes,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. W. 1. Dortch $ Son,*for defendant.

*

 Smith C. J. did not sit on the hearing of this case.

Faircloth, J.

Motion to set aside a judgment on the *512ground of “ mistake inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect *”*under C. C. P., § 133. His Honor finds these facts: .Summons returnable to Fall Term, 1876, of Wayne Superior Court when judgment by default was regularly entered. Defendant had actual notice thereof in January, 1877, and made his motion to set it aside in December, 1877. Defendant wrote a letter to his regular attorney in Northampton county, who did not practice in Wayne county, informing him of the action' but did not request him to defend it or send him a retainer. The defendant received no reply to this letter and took no further steps in regard to the action. The attorney in question- received the letter but overlooked the matter and no defence was made- Upon these facts His Honor held that they did not present a case of surprise, inadvertence or excusable neglect, and in this opinion we concur. The defendant did not attend Court himself >or write to an attorney of the Court in which the action was, or even ascertain that his letter was received or that his regular attorney would undertake to attend to the case. This was not such attention as men of ordinary prudence usually give to important business.

In *Griel*v. *Vernon,*65 N. C., 76, the motion to set aside was allowed on the' ground that the defendant had actually -employed an attorney, and his failure to plead was a surprise to his client, who had done all that could be reasonably required of him.

The case of *Burke*v. *Stokely,*65 N, C., 569, is very much like, and governs the present case. There, an attorney was not employed and therein differs from the case above cited, but a letter merely was sent and it did not appear whether it was received or not.

The burden of showing proper grounds for relief is always on the party seeking to vacate the judgment.

No- error. Judgment affirmed.
survenex104.htm










 Exhibit 10.4 







 Oral Compensation Agreement 


 


 The following is a written description of the Oral Compensation Agreement with Linda Fischer: 


 


 


 Effective December 15, 2007, Sur Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) agreed to compensate Linda Fischer, the President of the Company, $2,000 per month for services rendered, and to pay such compensation at a later date when sufficient funds are available.  


 


 


 


 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,214)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,201
<PP&E>                                          60,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,135)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,508
<BONDS>                                        143,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,151
<SALES>                                         78,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,002
<CGS>                                           55,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# CFD Analysis of Full-Scale Steam Generator Inlet Plenum Mixing During a PWR Severe Accident (NUREG-1788)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download Complete Document
        - NUREG-1788 (PDF - 4.56 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2004**Date Published:**May 2004

**Prepared by:**C.F. Boyd, D.M. Helton, K. Hardesty

Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory EffectivenessOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to predict steam generator inlet plenum mixing during a particular phase of a severe accident in a pressurized-water reactor. Boundary conditions are obtained from SCDAP/RELAP5 predictions of a TMLB station blackout. Fullscale CFD predictions are completed for the scaled-up geometry of a 1/7th scale test facility to isolate the scaleup effect. These predictions are repeated with a Westinghouse model 44 steam generator design. The effect of tube leakage on the mixing is also considered. Finally, predictions are completed for a steam generator from a Combustion Engineering (CE) nuclear power plant. Scaleup predictions indicate that data at 1/7th scale are indicative of the full-scale behavior for similar geometries. Predictions for a model 44 steam generator design indicate slightly less mixing and increased plume oscillations and indicate that the geometry is an important parameter. Tube leakage does not show a significant impact on the mixing for leakage rates below 1.4 kg/s at these severe accident conditions. A CE steam generator design results in significantly less inlet plenum mixing. The highest tube entrance temperatures approach the hot leg temperatures in this case. Heat transfer rates to the secondary side are determined to be a dominant governing parameter.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021