alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                       479
<INVENTORY>                                     12,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,684
<PP&E>                                          49,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,965
<SALES>                                         43,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,695
<CGS>                                           29,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    42
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT12.2**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGSTO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS**

**(inthousands except ratios)**

 
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended**  | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **September 30, 2007** | ** ** |
|                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions |       | $                      | 53,680     |   |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | 116,776                |       |
| Earnings before  debt service                                        |       | $                      | 170,456    |   |
|                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | $                      | 116,776    |   |
| Recurring  principal amortization                                    |       | 7,832                  |       |
| Total debt service                                                   |       | $                      | 124,608    |   |
|                                                                 |       |                   |       |
| **Ratio  of earnings to debt service**                               | ** ** | **1.37**               |       |

 

----
#### Lueck, Respondent, vs. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland,*attorneys, and *Bagley, Spohn & Ross,*of counsel, all of Madison.

For the respondent: *Bassuener & ILunke*of Sheboygan, attorneys, and *Eberlein & Larson*of Shawano, of counsel.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             168                     168
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        526                     526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1005                    1005
<PP&E>                                             142                     142
<DEPRECIATION>                                      29                      29
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2421                    2421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1087                    1087
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             4587                    4587
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            24                      24
<OTHER-SE>                                        1334                    1334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2421                    2421
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   752                    2372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11                     129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (764)                  (2782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (764)                  (2782)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (764)                  (2782)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)                  (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)                  (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### Marion Eskind MELANCON, Individually and as natural tutrix of the minors, Ernest Melancon, Jr. and Kathy Melancon, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 21892.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 12, 1965.

William Harris McBride, McBride & Brewster, Lafayette, La., for appellant.

Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before WOODBURY* WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

*

 Of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

In this suit arising out of a grade crossing collision, the District Court granted the motion for directed verdict of the defendant railroad company.

After careful consideration we have concluded that the facts warrant no inference other than that the sole and proximate cause of the collision and resulting death of the truck driver was his own negligence. See Turner v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 1961, 292 F.2d 586, for the strict test to be applied in determining whether a verdict should be directed. We have applied that test and found appellant’s case wanting.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11


                       Computation of Earnings Per Share


 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months                Year
                                                 Ended                    Ended
                                                June 30,                March 31,
                                                  1998                     1998
                                          ----------------         -----------------
<S>                                           <C>                    <C>                   
Net loss                                       ($1,813,186)            ($  8,674,902)
Dividends in arrears on preferred stock        (   385,793)            (     107,749)
Recognition of beneficial conversion           ( 3,875,984)            (   2,206,480)
 feature of preferred stock
Net loss available to common shareholders      ($6,074,963)             ($10,989,131)
                                          ================         =================
Weighted-average common shares used in 
 computing net loss per common share             8,422,261                 7,519,555
                                          ================         =================

Net loss per common share                            $(.72)                   $(1.46)
                                          ================         =================
</TABLE>




                                     II-7
# Critical Conservation Areas

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Programs & Initiatives 
-  Regional Conservation Partnership Program 
-  Critical Conservation Areas 

Critical Conservation Areas (CCAs) are designated by the Secretary of Agriculture and represent an opportunity for many stakeholders to come together at a regional level to address common natural resource goals while maintaining or improving agricultural productivity.

Partners, working closely with NRCS producers and communities, define and propose projects that will achieve regional natural resource goals while also meeting complementary local conservation priorities. 

RCPP Critical Conservation Areas National Map(1.57 MB)

----

## CCA Priority Resource Concerns

Proposals within the CCA funding pool must address at least one of the priority resource concerns and must be limited to areas within counties that are within, or transected by, the published boundaries of the CCA. A table of priority resource concerns and link to CCA maps can be found below.

### Chesapeake Bay Watershed

                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Water quality degradation

Chesapeake Bay CCA Map(1.02 MB)

Chesapeake Bay .zip(159.32 KB)

### Colorado River Basin

                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Insufficient water/drought
                    - Soil quality degradation
                    - Water quality degradation

Colorado River Basin CCA Map(774.48 KB)

Colorado River Basin .zip(1.97 MB)

### Great Lakes Region

                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Water quality degradation

Great Lakes Region CCA Map(1.13 MB)

Great Lakes .zip(231.39 KB)

### Longleaf Pine Range

                    - Degraded plant condition
                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Water quality degradation

Longleaf Pine Range CCA Map(1.27 MB)

Longleaf Pine .zip(107.25 KB)

### Mississippi River Basin

                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Insufficient water/drought
                    - Water quality degradation

Mississippi River Basin CCA Map(1.2 MB)

Mississippi River Basin .zip(217.07 KB)

### Northeast Forests and Waters

                    - Degraded plant condition
                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Water quality degradation

Northeast Region CCA Map(822.76 KB)

Northeast Forest and Waters .zip(415.2 KB)

### Prairie Grasslands Region

                    - Degraded plant condition
                    - Excess water/flooding
                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Insufficient water/drought 

Prairie Grasslands Region	CCA Map(1.07 MB)

Prairie Grasslands .zip(714.87 KB)

### Western Waters

                    - Inadequate habitat
                    - Insufficient water/drought
                    - Water quality degradation

Western Waters Region CCA Map(946.87 KB)

Western Waters .zip(1.57 MB)
# C_2004156EN.01000101.xml

| 12.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court

(2004/C 156/01)

Following their appointment as Judges of the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Governments of the Member States of the European Communities of 1 May 2004, (1)

1

| — | Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis, Mr Borg-Barthet, Mr Malenovský and Mr Levits
  (for the period from 1 May 2004 to 6 October 2006) and |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis, Mr Borg-Barthet, Mr Malenovský and Mr Levits

(for the period from 1 May 2004 to 6 October 2006) and

| — | Mr Makarczyk, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič, Mr Klučka and Mr Lõhmus,
  (for the period from 1 May 2004 to 6 October 2009) |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Makarczyk, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič, Mr Klučka and Mr Lõhmus,

(for the period from 1 May 2004 to 6 October 2009)

took the oath before the Court on 11 May 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 169 of 1.5.2004, p. 22.

1

---
# C_2004162EN.01000101.xml

| 19.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 June 2004

(2004/C 162/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2042 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4327 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65595 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1485 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5104 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,26 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3810 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58190 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,843 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6519 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4240 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5806 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 748 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,3500 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,925 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 792 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7523 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6511 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3913 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9214 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0671 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 396,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8014 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2042

JPY

Japanese yen

131,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4327

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65595

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1485

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5104

ISK

Iceland króna

87,26

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3810

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58190

CZK

Czech koruna

31,843

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6519

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4240

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5806

ROL

Romanian leu

40 748

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,3500

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,925

TRL

Turkish lira

1 792 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7523

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6511

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3913

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9214

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0671

KRW

South Korean won

1 396,93

ZAR

South African rand

7,8014

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# S4 S

Assistan t Genera l Counse l fo rAviatio n Enforcemen t an d Proceedings , C-7 0 U. S Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE. , Roo m W96-32 2 Washington , D C 2059 0 Te l +^,68797437 8 Fa x+/, 6 8 8 5 8 8 l o Mobil e +4 6 7

0 99 7 43 7 8 e-mail : ola.5undh@sas.5q-.. ^ „." > '.r j

— f .- 0 

# T 3 rs > 3 0 Ma y201 0 ( ^ fS J 

# rf^^ ^ mESr n 

# §^ 5 55 9 C O
5A S Reques to fwaive rfro m U S Par t 38 2 B y5 Septembe r200 8 SA S file d a waive rreques t fro m U S Par t 38 2 wit h U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n requestin g a waive rfro m th e followin g provisions :

1 ) 2 ) 3 ) 4 ) 5 ) Par t382.1 7 Par t382.29(a ) Par t382.8 1 Par t382.8 3 Par t382.8 5 I n th e mea n tim e ther e hav e bee n som e change s i n SAS ' seatin g restriction s whic h mea n tha tw e n o longe rse e an yconflic tbetwee n th e OM Aan d Par t 382.81 , Par t 382.8 3 an d Par t 382.85 . Therefor e w e hereb ywithdra wou rwaive rreques t regardin g thes e provisions . Fo ryou r informatio n w e enclos e a cop yo fth e revise d OMA . SAS ' waive rreques tregardin g Par t 382.1 7 an d Par t 382.29(a ) i s uphel d an d unchanged . Your s sincerel y Scandinavia n Airline s Syste m Denmar k

- Norwa y- Swede n Custome rRelation s Ol a Sund h Coordinato rPassenge rRight s

Scandinavia n Airline s Syste m Denmar k Norwa ySwede n SE-19 S 8 7 Stockholm , Sweden , Telephone : +4 6 8 79 7 0 0 0 0 ASTA R ALLIANC E MEMBE R >f^ ^ '
# L_2015246EN.01000701.xml

| 23.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1579

of 9 September 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Baranjski kulen (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Baranjski kulen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Baranjski kulen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Baranjski kulen’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Baranjski kulen’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Baranjski kulen’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2 Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) of Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 139, 28.4.2015, p. 5.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
# C_2004190EN.01001501.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/15

---

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 25 May 2004

in Case T-154/01: Distilleria F. Palma SpA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 - Common organisation of the market in wine - Regulation (EEC) No 1780/89 - Regulation (EEC) No 2710/93 - Regulation (EC) No 416/96 - Disposal of alcohol obtained by distillation - Regulation (EEC) No 3390/90 - Sale by tender for use as motor fuel - Refusal by the Commission to amend a number of conditions for the tender - Force majeure - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Admissibility)

(2004/C 190/24)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-154/01: Distilleria F. Palma SpA, in liquidation, established in Naples (Italy), represented by F. Caruso, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: L. Visaggio and C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro,) - application under Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC for compensation for damage allegedly suffered as a result of the Commission's allegedly unlawful conduct arising from the letter of 11 November 1996 sent by the Commission to the Italian authorities - the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 25 May 2004 in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 259 of 15.9.2001.

1

---
# C_2004199EN.01000202.xml

| 6.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3427 — SITA/SOL/JÄTEÄSSÄT/HYÖTYKESKUS JV)

(2004/C 199/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3427. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3427. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---