FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A pr i l 12, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 13133 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 0 3 3 - CR- 4 - RH U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s K U R T I S T Y R O N E W R I G H T , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N or the rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A p r i l12, 2007) B efo re D U B IN A , C A RN E S an d W IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: K u rt i s W ri g h tap p eal s h i s co n v i ct i o n fo r p o ssessi o n o f a fi rearm b y a2

c onvi c t e d f

e l on, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . §§ 922( g) ( 1) , 924( a ) ( 2) . W r i ght cont ends thatthere w as i nsuffi ci entevi dence t o con vi cthi m of the offens e. A ft er c a r e f u l r e v i e w o f

th e p a r t i e s a r g u me n t s a n d th e r e c o r d o n ap p e a l , w e a f f i r m.

“ W e r evi ew chal l enges t o the suff i ci ency of the evi dence de no vo , vi e w i ng th e e v id e n c e in th e lig h t m o s t f a v o r ab le to th e g o v e rn m e n t.” A tW r i ght ’ s tr i a l , the gove rnm e ntpr oduc e d e vi de nc e tha t : ( 1) W r i ghta tone t i m e a dm i tt e d c om m i tt i ng the ba nk r obbe ry us i ng a 9- m i l l i m e t e rpi s t ol ; ( 2) w hi l e i nc a r c e r a t e d W r i ght de s c r i be d the ba nk r obbe ry a nd hi s pos s e s s i on of the 9- m i l l i m e t e rpi s t ol t o a f e l l ow i nm a t e ; ( 3) W r i ghta dm i tt e d a ttr i a l tha the ha d t ouc he d a bl a c k pi s t ol on the da y of the robb ery; (4) W ri gh tl ed po l i ce on a hi gh -s peed chase usi ng a vehi cl e that m a t c he d the de s c r i pt i on of the ve hi c l e us e d i n the r obbe ry a nd tha tw a s c a rry i ng m e n w ho m a t c he d the de s c r i pt i on of the m e n w ho c om m i tt e d the a r m e d ba nk ro b b ery; an d (5 ) tw o l o ad ed fi rearm s, resem b l i n g th o se u sed i n th e b an k ro b b ery, w e r e l oc a t e d i n the tr a i l e rtha tW r i ghtw a s pa r ke d i n f r ontof w he n s pott e d by pol i c e . W hi l e W r i ghtque s t i ons the c r e di bi l i ty of hi s f e l l ow i nm a t e ’ s t e s t i m ony because the i nm at e s t oo d t o b enef i tfr om i t , w e have det erm i ned thatthe fa ctthat te s tim o n y m a y b e n e f

it th e p e r s o n g iv in g it d o e s n o t m a k e th e te s tim o n y in c r e d ib le . Se e U ni t e d Stat e s v . Chas tai n, 19 8 F . 3d 13 38 , 15 61 (11th C i r. 19 99 ). T hu s, i tw as f o rth e ju ry to d e c id e w h e th e rto b e lie v e th e te s tim o n y . S im ila r ly , th e ju ry c o u ld3

f i nd W r i ght ’ s t e s t i m ony tha tthe gun he t ouc he d w a s notone of the guns i ntr oduc e d a ttr i a l l a c ke d c r e di bi l i ty . I f di s be l i e ve d, W r i ght ’ s t e s t i m ony c oul d be u s e d a s s u b s ta n tiv e e v id e n c e o f h is g u ilt. U

ni t e d Stat e s v . W

oodw ar d, 459 F . 3d 1 0 7 8 , 1 0 8 7 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . W e f i nd thatthere w as suff

i ci entevi dence for aj ury t o fi nd thatW ri gh tw as gui l ty be y ond a r e a s onabl e doubtof pos s e s s i on of

a f i r e a r m by a c onvi c t e d f

e l on u n d e r§ 9 2 2 ( g ) ( 1 ) . A c c o r d i n g l y , w e a f f i r m. AF F I RME D.