alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                  |             | Exhibit 99(a) 
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------
|Household Finance Corporation     |             |               
|Household Automotive Trust 2001-1 |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|Original Principal Class A        |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 137,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                         | 159,000,000 |               
|Class A-3                         | 177,000,000 |               
|Class A-4                         | 187,000,000 |               
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)   |             |               
|Class A-1                         | 137,000     |               
|Class A-2                         | 159,000     |               
|Class A-3                         | 177,000     |               
|Class A-4                         | 187,000     |               
|                                  |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|Distribution Date                 |             | 2003 Totals   
|Days                              |             |               
|                                  |             |               
|CLASS A                           |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution   |             | 0.00          
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution   |             | 0.00          
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution  |             | 128,854,709.42
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution   |             | 3,761,536.70  
|                                  |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution  |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution   |             | 10,415,900.04
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Decommissioning Guidance (NUREG-1757)

# Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance - Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping, and Timeliness (NUREG-1757, Volume3, Revision 1)

        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1757, Volume 3, Revision 1 (PDF - 1.94 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2012**Date Published:**February 2012

**Prepared by:**K.M. Kline, C.M. Dean,1 T.L. Fredrichs, M.C. Maier,E.R. Pogue, and R.N. Young2

1ICF International9300 Lee HighwayFairfax, VA 22031

2 State of TennesseeDepartment of Environment and Conservation401 Church StreetNashville, TN 37243-1532

Office of Federal and State Materials andEnvironmental Management ProgramsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consolidated and updated numerous decommissioning guidance documents into this three volume NUREG. Specifically, the three volumes address the following topics:

(1) "Decommissioning Process for Materials Licensees";(2) "Characterization, Survey, and Determination of Radiological Criteria"; and(3) "Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping, and Timeliness."

This three-volume NUREG series replaces NUREG-1727 ("NMSS Decommissioning Standard Review Plan," issued September 2000) and NUREG/BR-0241 ("NMSS Handbook for Decommissioning Fuel Cycle and Materials Licensees," issued March 1997). This NUREG series is intended for use by NRC staff, licensees, and others.

Volume 3 of this NUREG series provides guidance on the technical aspects of compliance with requirements for timeliness in decommissioning of materials facilities, the requirements for financial assurance for decommissioning, and the recordkeeping requirements related to eventual decommissioning.

Licensees should use this guidance in preparing decommissioning plans, license termination plans, final status surveys, and other technical decommissioning reports for submittal to the NRC. The NRC staff will use this guidance in reviewing these documents and related license amendment requests.

Volume 3 is intended to apply only to the decommissioning of materials facilities licensed under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Parts 30, 40, 70, and 72.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 17, 2011 | By:    | /s/ John P. Murray                                                                   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  | John P. Murray                                                                       |
|                 | Title: | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |
**OFFICE OF**  **THE A-ITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  TEXAS **AUSTIN**

iioaorabla Topl

Xooro **county Attorney**  **calduell county**  Lookhart,Tour
Dear Slrr

, ~08~ or baying right ror.publlo

### roadr? other queatlan.



## . or thla part as

to the genrral

## run4 eql then **to** the 

## rund?- aelary. 

### 96

Eonorable TomWorm --Pam 2

Thlr dopartsoat hald in Oplnlonila. O-413 the8 a Copairmlonon~ Cowt,doer not ham authorityto pu?ohareright of 1~89oat OS thegeneral **fund8** or the county or lev l ~ubllo laproruaaat tar, and ~8 the oron for thet pwgo8ea

3 tho case of Carroll I. ?lllleaa, 202 8. Ur 304 the Su&ae Court of Texas ezyreasly hold tbnt the Jury funi and other oonstltutloisl itada theroin designated**ooaporod oi** 
**‘ fund8**  raised by teation ooalflnot be legally translrrrrd frm ona to aaothor, ant that Artiola 1630 Yernon(stiotatwd Cl~ll Btatutos, ha8 

### l

pplioatlon to speolal haamda eremtod by **rtatutor** acd mai riot ap~lioablo tp oOrmtitutiona1 tundr. The Court nant rurtbor acd kale lc the CerroU Car0 that SoOtloP9, Art&ok a or tha Bteto Conrtltutioa not only plad)d l llmitatloa on t&m amouct of baaa whloh ml&t bs lerhd by any oountr ror the yurjmou tkeroir?. ummrated, but alao derigzatod end plaood a llmltatlonon tho amunt to be aapsntied, ic that tams r&hod for oco pqoes therein6oflneGoould aot be-expende6for my . othor purpoao. -

Fe reape~tfullyanmmr beta of the bbow stated quo@- bloas in tte cegatlre. Yours rery tndy
BybdL i

hrdollrllllur Amrlrtmt

i
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

Glossary                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Silverstar  Holdings,  Ltd.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Clive Kabatznik,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

         and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                           /s/ Clive Kabatznik
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Clive Kabatznik
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Date: February 14, 2006


                                                                              26
#### ROSSO & MASTRACCO, INC., Appellee, v. SAM FINLEY, INC., Appellant.

No. 9762.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1965.

Decided March 18, 1965.

William C. Coupland and P. A. Agelas-to, Jr., Norfolk, Va., for appellant.

M. R. Broudy, Norfolk, Va. (Broudy & Broudy, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for ap-pellee.

Before BOREMAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and LARKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appellee, plaintiff below, obtained a money judgment against the defendant for damages assertedly flowing from defendant’s breach of its contractual undertaking to grade, drain, fill and pave plaintiff’s parking lot to be used in connection with plaintiff’s supermarket then under construction. Judgment was entered on the general verdict of a jury returned after a trial which extended over a period of several days.

Upon careful examination of the trial record, and upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, we conclude that the issues were fairly presented to the jury for determination, there was no error in the proceedings and the verdict and judgment should not be disturbed.

Affirmed.
Bnv Anrn

ArnQeurv

MnNncEMENT

DrsrRrcr

ALAMEDA COUNTY

Tom Bates

Scott Haggerty

Jennifer Hosterman

Nate Miley

(Secretary)

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

John Gioia

(Chairperson)

David Hudson

Mary Piepho

Mark Ross

MARIN COUNTY

Katie Rice

NAPA COUNTY

Brad Wagenknecht

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

John Avalos

Edwin M. Lee

Eric Mar

SAN MATEO COUNTY

Carole Groom

Carol Klatt

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

Susan Garner

Ash Kalra

'uJi'.Îi,1u w

Ken Yeager

SOLANO COUNTY

James Spering

SONOMA COUNTY

Susan Gorin

Shirlee Zane

Jack P. Broadbent

EXECUTIVE OFFICER/APCO

November 9,2012

James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer

Ca!ifornia Air Resources Board

P. O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812-281 5

Re: Submittal of the PM2.5 Emissions lnventory for the San Francisco Bay Area

Dear Mr. Goldstene:

Attached please find the PM2.5 Emissions lnventory for the San Francisco Bay

Area. The inventory prov¡des estimated emissions by source category for winter

2010 tor primary PM2.5, as well as for the following precursor pollutants: reactive

organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and

ammonia (NH3). The emission inventory was adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality

Management District Board of Directors during a public hearing at their November

7,2012 meeting. No public comments were submitted during the comment period

or the public hearing. ln addition to the emissions inventory, also attached are the

following documents: the Notice of Public Hearing (NPH) issued 9126112, Proof of

Publication for the NPH, the staff report to the Board of Directors, and the Board

Resolution.

As directed by the Board, I request that the California Air Resources Board submit

the inventory to the US Environmental Protection Agency for inclusion in the

California State lmplementation Plan in fulfillment of SIP planning requirements for

PM2.5. ,

lf you have any questions, please contact David Burch at DBurch@BAAQMD.gov

or 415-749-4641. We appreciate your assistance.

L{,

Pollution Control Officer

Attachments:

. PM2.5 Emissions lnventory

. Notice of Public Hearing

. Proof of Publication for the Notice of Public Hearing

. Staff report to the Board of Directors

. Board Resolution

P.

939 EuIs SrRser . SAN FRaNclsco Cel-IpoRNte9{l}9 . 4I5.771.6000 . www.bøaqmd.gov
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Joe Kaeser, Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 27, 2013



/s/    JOE
KAESERName: Joe Kaeser
Title:   Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### W. H. SHIELDS and others v. A. H. SMITH and others.

*Witness*— Party *in Interest.*

Under § 343, 0. C. P., a party to an action'is a competent witness as to a transaction between himself and a person at the time of such examination deceased, when the representative of such deceased person is not a party to the action.

Civil Action tried at January Special Term, 1878, of Halifax Superior Court, before *Schenek. J.*

His Honor overruled the objection to the testimony of the witness upon the facts set out in the opinion of this Court. Verdict and judgment for defendants and appeal by plaintiffs.

*Mr. T. N. Sill,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Gilliam Gatling*and *JBusbee*Busbee, for defendants.

Reade, J.

The question being whether a transaction between Hyman and Smith and Briggs was *bona*fide, the said Smith one of the defendants was allowed to testify as a witness to a conversation between himself and said Hyman as to the very transaction while it was in process of arrangement — the said Hyman being dead at the time of the trial. This would be in conflict with C. C. P., § 343, which provides that no party to the action * * * shall be examined in regard to any transaction or communication between such witness and a person at the time of such examination deceased, where.the representative of such deceased person is a party. But here the representative of Hyman, the deceased person, is not a party and therefore the exclusion does not apply and the testimony was competent. This is the only question of importance, because tne jury find the transaction *bona fide.*

No Error. Affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2011

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020
---

Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Scott
Wilson, CPG, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding
the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the Livengood
Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form 40-F
Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form of
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ Scott Wilson                
| | --- | --------------------------------
| |     | Scott Wilson, CPG               
| |     | Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-1825)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1825 (PDF - 46.0 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2005**Manuscript Published:**May 2005

 Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA) by the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (the staff). By letter dated September 12, 2003, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC or the applicant) submitted the LRA for FNP in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 54). The SNC is requesting renewal of the operating licenses for FNP, Units 1 and 2 (Facility Operating License Numbers NPF-2 and NPF-8, respectively) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration dates of midnight, June 25, 2017, for Unit 1 and midnight, March 31, 2021, for Unit 2.

The FNP units are located about 16.5 miles east of the City of Dothan, in Houston County, Alabama, on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River. The NRC issued the construction permits for FNP, Units 1 and 2, on August 16, 1972. The operating licenses were issued by the NRC on June 25, 1977, for Unit 1 and March 31, 1981, for Unit 2. The FNP consists of two Westinghouse pressurized-water reactor units. Each unit is designed to generate 2775 megawatt thermal (MWt), or approximately 910 megawatt electric (MWe).

This staff reviewed the FNP license renewal application in accordance with Commission regulations and NUREG-1800, "Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants," dated July 2001. The staff's conclusion of its review of the FNP LRA can be found in Section 6 of this SER.

Since its issuance, the SER has been revised to clarify a license condition listed in Section 1, Introduction and General Discussion, under Subsection 1.7, Summary of Proposed License Conditions. The revision is identified by a status bar in the right margin. 

The NRC license renewal project manager is Ms. Tilda Liu. Ms. Liu may be reached at (301) 415-1315. Written correspondence should be addressed to the License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, Mail Stop O-11F1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021