alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 210/31/2014 15:59:38

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Byron 1 Docket (050- 00454)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Fitness for Duty / IR125 - Work hour control O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content P - Procedure Writers O - Control Room Ops 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content P - Procedure Writers Q - Fire Protection 

316

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA O - Operations Q - Fire Protection 

146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

211

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR181 - Inadequate staffing / task allocation O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

181 - Inadequate staffing / task allocation Y - Shipping / transportation Y - Shipping / transportatio 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements E - Electrical Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Y - Shipping / transportation Y - Shipping / transportatio 

189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA Q M - Mechanical - Fire Protection 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 2 of 210/31/2014 15:59:38

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Byron 1 Docket (050- 00454)

Work Planning & Practices / IR196 - Independent verification / plant tours LTA M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 

1263

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 19
#### STATE v. JOHN P. ROBBINS.

*Indictment*— Assault *and Battery*— Judge’s *Charge.*

Where on the trial of an indictment for an assault and battery, committed upo.n the prosecutor, a school teacher while engaged in his-school, the Court charged the jury that "‘if the defendant went to the school-house for a lawful purpose and after he got there he brought on the affray by any language or conduct of his own, he' would be guilty Held not to be error.

INDICTMENT for an Assault and Battery tried at Fall Term, 1877, of Watauga Superior Court, before *Cloud, J.*

The defendant and his three sons were indicted for an ’ assault upon one Purley. The prosecutor testified among other things that he was teaching a common school lindería contract with two of the School Committee of the District; that the defendant who was the other memberjof said committee upon passing the school house went to the door *432thereof and inquired of the witness, what he was doing ; he informed him, he was teaching school, having been employed by the other two committeemen; that defendant denied this statement and called the witness a liar, and the witness struck him and knocked him out of the door. 'There was much other evidence tending to show that the parties cursed each other, and that the prosecutor also called •the defendant a liar. Iiis Honor in his charge to the jury ■said-, “if the defendant went to the school house for a lawful purpose, and after he got there, he brought on the affray by :any language or conduct of his own, he would be guilty.” (See *Stale*v. Perry, 5 Jones 9.) Defendant excepted. Verdict of guilty as t© two of the defendants. Judgment. Ap peal by defendants.

*Attorney General*and *Mr. G. N. Folk,*for the State.

No counsel for the defendants.

Faircloth, J.

After hearing and considering the conflicting evidence, the. jury by their verdict have said the defendants "were guilty. No error in the conduct of the action has been pointed out to us, and we are unable to discover any in the record. Let this be certified in order that judgment may be pronounced.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
# Fo urth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00318

- CV

Leticia R. BENAVIDES, Appellant

v.

Cristina B. ALEXANDER as permanent guardian of the person of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., et al., Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Cou rt

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ

- 000161

- D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s r ecord was originally due to be filed in this appeal on June 13, 2019. On March 10, 2020, after several volumes of the record were filed, this court was informed that Ms. Gay Richey is responsible for preparing the final outstanding volumes (volumes 11, 14, 16, & 19). After several unsuccessful attempts to contact Ms. Richey, this court notified her by letter dated March 26, 2020 that the outstanding volumes of the reporter’s record were late. We directed Ms. Richey to file a notification of late record if s he had not received payment or to file the reporter’s record no later than April 27, 2020. The reporter’s record was not filed by the

extended deadline. On April 28, 2020, we again ordered Ms. Richey to file the reporter’s record

in this court within fifte en days. The reporter’s record was not filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Richey file the reporter’s record in this court no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. If the record is not received by such date, an order may be issu ed directing Ms. Richey to appear before this court in person and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. Richey by certified mail, retur n receipt requested, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 35.3(c), the clerk of the co urt is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge of the 49th Judicial District Court._________________________________ Sand ee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1995

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE


### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER

Case number: 01

- 12

- 007 28

- CV

Style: In re Santander Consumer USA, Inc. , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Bonner v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. , No. 2011

- 76048 in

the 80th District Court of Harris County, Texas

.

R elator Santander Consumer USA, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the denial of it s motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act [FAA]

. Our writ of mandamus will issue only to correct an abuse of discretion for which there is no adequate remedy by appeal. See Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. Wittig , 876 S.W.2d 304, 305 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding). The Court requests that relator file supp lemental briefing explaining why the petition should not be d enied because section 51.016 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Codes provides for immediate review of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the FAA by interlocutory appeal. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . § 51.016 (West Supp. 2011). The supplemental briefing is due no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 17,

2012

.

The Court further requests that the real party in interest respond to relator’s petition and any suppl emental briefing. The response, if any, is due no later than 5:00

p.m. on Thursday, September 6, 2012

.

At the same time it filed the petition, relator filed a motion for emergency stay.

The motion for emergency stay is denied

.

With respect to all fili ngs requested by this order, the Court suspends the application in this case of the mailbox rule, T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.2. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge ’ s signature:

_______________________________ Acting individually

Date: August 10, 2012
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 I, Philip McDermott, certify that:
 
 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AltiGen Communications, Inc. (the registrant);
 
 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: August 16, 2004By:  /s/ Philip M. McDermottPhilip M. McDermott
          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **First American Scientific Corp.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **March 31, 2004** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Brian Nichols**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of May, 2004.

 

 
/s/ Brian Nichols 
Brian NicholsChief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEvents, Reports Associated with

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Power Reactor Status Reports
          - Event Notification Reports
          - Morning Reports
          - Part 21 Reports
          - Preliminary Notification Reports
          - Search Licensee Event Reports (LERSearch)
          - Search Inspection Reports
          - Search Event Notifications

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - Environmental Justice 
                - NRC COVID-19 Update
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - Mission Analytics Portal
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - New Reactor Construction - Vogtle
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement
                - Strategic Plan
                - For Employees

# Search Inspection Reports

[Body Content]

Page Last Reviewed/Updated [DATE]
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Registrant Report
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.
 Date: February 22, 2011
    /s/ David HirschhornDavid HirschhornChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
TO: Docket: EPA action on Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan FROM: Ann Lyons DATE: September 27, 2011 RE: Meeting with Sierra Club St op Coal Campaign Representatives Participants: Bruce Nilles, Sierra Club Suma Peesapati, Earthjustice Deborah Jordan, EPA Region Air Division Director Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9 Office of Regional Counsel

Bruce Nilles requested the meeting. EPA indicated we would place a memorandum of the meeting in the open docket on EPA’s approval of the Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan submittal. Sierra Club indicated that the coal fired power plant fleet in the US is being shutdown and cleaned up, citing examples in Oregon and Washi ngton States that have announced retirement. Sierra Club also indicated that the EPA regi onal office in region 6 has been more rigorous regarding Best Available Retrofit Technology th an Region 9 proposed to approve as Nevada Division of Environmental Protection’s BART de termination for the Reid Gardner Generating Station. Deborah Jordan pointed out the distinction between promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan and approving a State’s submittal of a State Implementation Plan. The meeting ended after approximately 30 minutes.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of
my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERG                              
| |                                                      
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

Date: August 9, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
March 3, 2008








/S/   FIROZ H
      LALJIFiroz
      H. LaljiChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen M. Ambler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BAM! Entertainment, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
   registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
   directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2003

/s/  Stephen M. Ambler
---------------------------
Stephen M. Ambler
Chief Financial Officer