alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. SEWELL GILLESPIE.

*False. Pretence*— Value *of Property.*

In an indictment for obtaining goods by false pretence, no averment of the value of the property need be made.

Indictment for obtaining goodfe under False Pretences tried at Fall Term, 1878, of Iredell Superior Court, before *Gudgea•, J.*

After a verdict of guilty the defendant’s counsel moved in arrest of judgment on the ground that the bill of indictment did not charge the property, alleged to have been obtained by false representations of defendant, to be of any value. The motion was refused, judgment, and the defendant appealed.

*Attorney General,*for the state.

*Mr. R. M. Allison,*for the defendant.

*397Ashe, J.

The defendant has been convicted for a violation of the provisions of Bat. Rev., ch. 32, § 66, which makes it a misdemeanor, “ by means of any forged or counterfeit paper in writing or in print, or by any false token or other false pretence whatsoever, to obtain from any person or corporation within the state, any money, goods or property, or other thing of value, or any bank note, check,” &c. There was a motion in arrest of judgment, motion overruled, and judgment pronounced, from which the defendant appealed. Mr. Bishop, in his valuable work on criminal procedure in treating of the subject of cheats and false pretences (vol. 2, § 139,) says, — “ whether the value of the property should be stated in the indictment depends upon the law which fixes the punishmentand again in § 676, — “that when the degree of the punishment depends in any measure upon the value of the thing stolen, the indictment must state its value; in other cases it need not.” There are no degrees of criminality in the offence charged in this indictment, and no other punishment can be inflicted than that prescribed in Bat. Rev., ch. 32, § 29. There is no necessity for alleging the value with the view of fixing the punishment to be imposed.

The statute under which the indictment is framed does not require the property obtained to be of any particular value; nor do we think the words “ or other thing of value ” were used by the law makers to qualify the words immediately preceding — “-money, goods, property” — but only to enlarge the class of personal things which they were making it penal to obtain by false pretences. Such was the construction put upon the New York statute which is very similar to ours. The words there used were “money, personal property, or valuable thing;” and it was there held in *People*v. *Stetson,*4 Barb., 151, that the statute under which the indictment was framed did not require that the property obtained should be of any particular value. The words are, *398any money, personal property, or valuable thing; therefore it need not be alleged in the indictment. 2 Bish. Cr. Pro., § 139. There is no error. Let this be certified to the court below that further proceedings may be had according to law.

Per Curiam. No error.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1916 

To ensure the ballistic missile defense capacity of the Army. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. SHUSTER (for himself, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of 

Georgia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. TURNER, Mr. 

MOULTON, and Ms. TSONGAS) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure the ballistic missile defense capacity of the Army. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patriot Inventory Pro5 tection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE DE7 FENSE CAPACITY OF THE ARMY. 

8 (a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to 

9 be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

10 2018 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Army may be 

11 obligated or expended to demilitarize any GEM–T interVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:57 Apr 12, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1916.IH H1916

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1916 IH

1 ceptor or remove any such interceptor from the oper2 ational inventory of the Army until the date on which the 

3 Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional de4 fense committees the evaluation conducted under sub5 section (b). 

6 (b) EVALUATION.—The Secretary and the Chief of 

7 Staff of the Army shall jointly conduct an evaluation of 

8 the ability of the Army to meet warfighter requirements 

9 and operational needs if GEM–T interceptors are removed 

10 from the operational inventory of the Army. In conducting 

11 such evaluation, the Secretary and the Chief of Staff shall 

12 evaluate whether the Army can maintain an inventory of 

13 interceptors necessary to retain the capability provided by 

14 GEM–T interceptors and to meet such operational needs 

15 by either— 

16 (1) recertifying GEM–T interceptors (either 

17 with or without modification); or 

18 (2) developing, testing, and fielding a new low19 cost interceptor that can be placed on the oper20 ational inventory of the Army prior to the retirement 

21 of GEM–T interceptors. 

22 (c) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) 

23 shall not apply to activities that the Secretary determines 

24 are critical to the safety of GEM–T interceptors. 

25 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1916 IH

1 (1) The term ‘‘congressional defense commit2 tees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

3 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

4 (2) The term ‘‘GEM–T interceptor’’ means the 

5 Patriot guidance enhanced missile TBM. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2015281EN.01000901.xml

| 27.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1923

of 26 October 2015

amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea.

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, those restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, those restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2016.

| (3) | Decision 2010/638/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/638/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 8(2) of Decision 2010/638/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 27 October 2016. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10).

1

---
# Massachusetts State Office

451 West StAmherstMA01002-2934

413-253-4350

451 West StAmherstMA01002-2934

Massachusetts

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Massachusetts 
-  Massachusetts State Office 

Welcome! The Massachusetts State Office in Amherst, Mass. is the state headquarters for NRCS operations in the Bay State. If you're a farmer or forestland owner looking for help, please contact your local NRCS field office at a USDA Service Center. There are seven field offices in Massachusetts.

## Welcome to NRCS in Massachusetts!

### Dan Wright, State Conservationist

NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team, XXXX

## Key Contacts

### Dan Wright

                -    413-253-4350 
                -    daniel.wright@usda.gov 

----

##   State Office Employee Directory
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance Budget/Congressional Budget Justification (NUREG-1100)

# Performance Budget: Fiscal Year 2009 (NUREG-1100, Volume 24)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Overview

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1100, Volume 24 (PDF - 4.99 MB)
        - Budget Press Briefing Slides

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: February 2008

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Overview

This fiscal year (FY) 2009 budget request reflects a increase in the agency's regulatory activities, driven primarily by an anticipated interest in constructing new nuclear power facilities, oversight of existing reactors, and materials and waste licensing. The agency expects to review 21 uranium recovery applications, which produce the raw materials for nuclear fuel, to receive two applications for new facilities that will enrich uranium to produce the nuclear fuel used in reactors, and to receive an application from the Department of Energy (DOE) to construct and operate a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. During FY 2008, the agency expects to initiate the review of 14 Combined Operating Licenses (COL) applications. During FY 2009, acceptance reviews are anticipated to be performed on seven additional COLs. Commencement of the reviews of these seven COL applications will occur within an 8-month timeframe following the acceptance of the applications. It is the agency's responsibility to review the applications in a timely manner so that our licensees will be able to build and operate facilities that produce electricity needed for our Nation's economic growth. To fund these license application reviews, as well as the many other activities necessary to meet the agency's mission, the agency requests $1.02 billion for FY 2009.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 28, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2025
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2002

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 28, 2022
---

Exhibit 13.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian
  Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Hyeon Seong Myeong, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/John YC
MyungName: Myung, John YC Title: President, CEO, Director
Date: July, 2009

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      29,941,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,113,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,287,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                122,289,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,630,000
<PP&E>                                       5,485,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,318,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             162,797,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      127,843,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,949,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               162,797,000
<SALES>                                     28,617,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,617,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,659,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,044,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,914,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,574,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,340,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Robert
M. Dennerlein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of June 30, 2003 (the last date of
               the period covered by the Report).


/s/ Robert M. Dennerlein
------------------------------
Robert M. Dennerlein
Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August 20, 2003
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-1839)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1839            - Part 1: Cover through Section 2 (PDF - 14.5 MB)
          - Part 2: Section 3 through Appendix E (PDF - 34.9 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2005**Date Published:**December 2005

**Prepared by:** V. Rodriguez

Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Units 1 and 2 license renewal application (LRA) by the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (the staff). By letter dated February 25, 2004, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC or the applicant) submitted the LRA for PBNP in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 54). NMC is requesting renewal of the operating licenses for PBNP Units 1 and 2 (Facility Operating License Numbers DPR-24 and DPR-27, respectively) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration dates of midnight, October 5, 2010, for Unit 1 and midnight, March 8, 2013, for Unit 2.

The PBNP units are located about 30 miles SE of Green Bay and about 90 miles NNE of Milwaukee in east central Wisconsin (Manitowoc County) on the west shore of Lake Michigan. The NRC issued the construction permit for PBNP Unit 1 on July 19, 1967, and for Unit 2 on July 25,1968. The operating licenses were issued by the NRC on October 5,1970, for Unit 1 and March 8, 1973 for Unit 2. The PBNP consists of two Westinghouse pressurized light-water moderated and cooled system units originally designed to generate 1518.5 megawatt thermal (MWt), or approximately 523.8 megawatt electric (MWe). Each unit has undergone a low pressure turbine retrofit modification which increases the unit design output to 537,960 kWe. In 2003, a measurement uncertainty recapture power uprate was performed increasing each unit's rated thermal power level to 1540 MWt.

This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted to the NRC through August 23, 2005, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER. The staff identified open items and confirmatory items that had to be resolved before the staff could make a final determination on the application. Sections 1.5 and 1.6 of this report summarize these items and their resolutions. Section 6 presents the staff's final conclusion on the review of the PBNP application.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
July 18,2012 

Mr. Dennis J DeVany 

Jfouse of 'Rep-resentatives 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

HARRISBURG 

SCOTT E. HUTCHINSON, MEMBER 152 MAIN CAPITOL 0\JILOJNG, PO BOX 202064 

HARRISBURG, PA 17120·2064 

PHONE: {71-7) 783-8188 

FAX: (717)705-1945 

Chief; Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

United Stated Department of Transportation 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

+ ... 

'" 1 ,( 

u .. tr 30 

As the Pennsylvania State Representative in the 64111 Legislative District covering Venango and a portion of 

Butler Counties, I would like to express my support for the bid proposal submitted by Silver Airways, Dba 

United Express to provide air service under the Essential Air Service Program, to Franklin/Oil City and the 

_______ --l-OniLI nR~e¥rg1w'own~ . ..rHuaving_pro..v.ided.air.caJ:r.ier~llel~ice...'li~ce-..~ept.enlber-Of:W08,th~ha¥e~~oorm(fH:i,r.easenab!y ....... ~~--~"·~-··--···-

well in spite of some winter weal her difnculties. The carrier has recently gone through a bankruptcy, 

reorganization and re-branding under new management and we anticipate that this along with the 

completed merger with United Airlines will produce a strong air service operator for our communities. The 

proposed service through the Cleveland hub offers the most efficient and realistic connection between this 

rural region and the Nations Air Transport System, and maintaining this connectivity is critical tor our 

economic vitality. 

This community wjll work with the air cmTier.tp improve enplanements and mitigate; the carrier's financial 

risk wherever possible. The cmTier operates at Franklin/Oil City without incurring any airport fees or cost. 

Silver Airways has met with local leaders and indicated that they will likewise work with our community to 

increase visibility and promote usage. 

Please recommend to the Assls~<mt Secretary that t!w Essential Air Service proposal submitted.by Silver 

Airways for franklin/Oil City he approved. 

Sincerely, 

Scott E. Hutchinson 

State Representative 

6410 Legislative District 

Venango and Butler Counties
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

MICHAEL BENSON WOLF 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2139 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C2-11-408 

(Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia 

County, Criminal Division, No. CP-51-CR0001918-2012) 

Attorney Registration No. 52879 

(Montgomery County) 

 O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2015, the Joint Petition to Temporarily 

Suspend an Attorney is granted and, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 214, Michael Benson Wolf 

is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of 

Pa.R.D.E. 217.