alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1995 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for national 

testing of a model of Medicare Advantage value-based insurance design 

to meet the needs of chronically ill Medicare Advantage enrollees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, and 

Mrs. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for national testing of a model of Medicare Advantage 

value-based insurance design to meet the needs of chronically ill Medicare Advantage enrollees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Value-Based Insurance 

5 Design for Better Care Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘V-BID for 

6 Better Care Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1995 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADAPTING BENEFITS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF 

2 CHRONICALLY ILL MEDICARE ADVANTAGE 

3 ENROLLEES. 

4 Section 1859 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395w–28) is amended by adding at the end the following 

6 new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(h) NATIONAL TESTING OF MODEL FOR MEDICARE

8 ADVANTAGE VALUE-BASED INSURANCE DESIGN.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In implementing the model 

10 described in paragraph (2) proposed to be tested 

11 under section 1115A(b), the Secretary shall revise 

12 the testing of the model under such section to cover, 

13 effective not later than January 1, 2019, all States. 

14 ‘‘(2) MODEL DESCRIBED.—The model described 

15 in this paragraph is the testing of a model of Medi16 care Advantage value-based insurance design that 

17 would allow Medicare Advantage plans the option to 

18 propose and design benefit structures that vary ben19 efits, cost-sharing, and supplemental benefits offered 

20 to enrollees with specific chronic diseases proposed 

21 to be carried out in Oregon, Arizona, Texas, Iowa, 

22 Michigan, Indiana, Tennessee, Alabama, Pennsyl23 vania, and Massachusetts. 

24 ‘‘(3) TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION PROVI25 SION NOT APPLICABLE UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2022.— 

26 The provisions of section 1115A(b)(3)(B) shall apply 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1995 IH

1 to the model described in paragraph (2), including 

2 such model as expanded under paragraph (1), begin3 ning January 1, 2022, but shall not apply to such 

4 model, as so expanded, prior to such date. 

5 ‘‘(4) FUNDING.—The Secretary shall allocate 

6 funds made available under section 1115A(f)(1) to 

7 design, implement, and evaluate the model described 

8 in paragraph (2), as expanded under paragraph 

9 (1).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9022]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Four Allegories by Veronese: A Rediscovery and a 
Reunion''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Four Allegories by Veronese: A Rediscovery 
and a Reunion,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, 
California, from on or about March 7, 2015, until on or about September 
7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-02240 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2110 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2110

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2017

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Fairness for All Families Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED EARNED INCOME CREDIT FOR FAMILIES WITH MORE THAN 3 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 32(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Percentages.--For purposes of subsection (a)--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             The credit
  ``In the case of an eligible individual    percentage    The phaseout
                   with:                         is:      percentage is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 qualifying child........................         34.00           15.98
2 qualifying children.....................         40.00           21.06
3 qualifying children.....................         45.00           21.06
4 qualifying children.....................         50.00           21.06
5 qualifying children.....................         55.00           21.06
6 qualifying children.....................         60.00           21.06
7 or more qualifying children.............         65.00           21.06
No qualifying children....................          7.65        7.65.''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (3) of section 32(b) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (A).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2004140EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/5 |

---

RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/B/2/03

(2004/C 140/05)

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS (B 5/B 4)

in the field of production coordination

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ADYNS Véronique |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BAILLIE Fraser |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BIRMANN Sophie |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | HAYSOM Marcus |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | HOLLOWAY Marcelle |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | MALAGON GARCIA Maria del Carmen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | MORLEY Peter |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | PETER Bärbel |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | TANAKIDIS Michail-Alexandros |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | WIESNER Lâle |

in the field of proof-reading

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BAILLY Laurence |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BLAKE Lara |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BROWN Fiona |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | CREEDON Paula |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | DOLLEY Margaret |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | HEYVAERT Sabine |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | KELLY Madeline |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | KIDD Dale |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | KILLEEN Brian |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | McCLUSKEY Karen |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | MEEHAN Sheila |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ROCHE Duncan |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | SMITH Claire |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | WAINWRIGHT Christopher |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | WILLIAMS Pamela |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | WILLIAMSON Lois |

---
*May 17, 1938.*

#### Conners, Appellant, vs. Scullion, Respondent.

For the appellant: /. *Charles Pile*of Dodgeville.

For the respondent: *Fiedler, Boardman, Jones & Fiedler*of Mineral Point.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A2 10 3 . DAVORI S HODGES v . THE STATE.

Dav o ri s Ho d g es was co n v i ct ed o f fel o n y m u rd er an d o t h er o ffen s es

. Aft er t h e

t ri al co u rt d en i ed h i s m o t i o n fo r a n ew t ri al , Ho d g es fi l ed t h is d i rect ap p eal

. Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n , t h e Su p rem e Co u r t h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d ict i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n w h ich a s en t en ce o f d eat h was i m p o s ed o r co ul d b e i m

p o s ed .” Ga.

Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y of d eat h can b e

i m p o s ed fo r th e cri m e o f fel on y m u rd er, j u ri s d i ct io n i s p ro per i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. S e e OCGA § 1 6 -5 -1 (c), (e) (1 ); Nea l v. S t at e , 2 9 0 Ga. 5 6 3

, 5 72 (7 22 S E2 d 7 6 5 )
(2 0 1 2) (Hu n st ei n , C. J

. , co n cu rri n g ); s ee al s o S t at e v. Th o r n t on , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4

, 5 2 4 (1 )
(3 2 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 98 4 ) (d i rect i n g t h i s Co urt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a

s en t en ce o f d eat h o r of l i fe i m p ri s o n m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u po n co n v ict i o n o f

m u rd er”). Acco rd i n g l y , H o dg es ’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e

Co u rt fo r d i s po s it i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/29/2016 July 29, 2016
# C_2004199EN.01000501.xml

| 6.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/5

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

(2004/C 199/06)

The Commission envisages to delay to 31 October 2004 the date of publication of the call for proposals foreseen in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002 which establishes the implementing measures for the regime foreseen in Council Regulation (EC) No 814/2000 concerning information measures relating to the common agricultural policy, and this for reasons of sound management due in particular to the extension to the citizens of the new Member States of the above regime.

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ronald Jankov, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RONALD JANKOVRonald Jankov President and Chief Executive Officer February 28, 2006




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0368 

PETER GRIGG, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

v. 

JUDGE MATT CUFFE, 

Defendant and Appellee. 

MAY 1 0 2022 

R,)wen Greenwood -If Supreme Court nf Montana 

ORDER 

On April 12, 2022, we issued an Opinion in the above-entitled action, affirming the 

District Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Judge Matt Cuffe that 

Grigg's "Petition to Overturn Unlawful Eviction Judgement [sic] [and] Remove Judge Matt 

Cuffe from Office" was a collateral attack barred as a matter of law. Grigg timely filed a 

Petition for Rehearing. M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a) provides that a petition for rehearing will 

be considered only when the Court "overlooked some fact material to the decision," when 

"it overlooked some question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the 

case," or when "its decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" 

by the Court. 

Having fully considered Grigg's positions, we conclude that rehearing is not 

warranted under the standards of M. R. App. 20(1)(a). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail copies of this Order to Peter Grigg and to all 

counsel of record. 

DATED this It) — day of May, 2022 

05/10/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0368
• 

) •
**Exhibit
      12.1**




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Collin Ellison, certify that:




1.
      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Goldbelt Resources
      Ltd.;




2.
      Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;




3.
      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated
      December 22, 2006




/s/
      Collin
      Ellison


Collin
      Ellison


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer
# APPENDIX P

Listof

# 126 CWASection307(a) PriorityToxicPollutants



# WATERQUALITYSTANDARDSHANDBOOK

SECONDEDITION126 Priority Pollutants

A. Chlorinated Benzenes Chlorobenzene 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1,3-dichlorobenzene 1,4-dichlorobenzene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene

B. Chlorinated Ethanes Chloroethane l,l-dichloroethane 1,2-dichloroethane l,l,l-trichloroethane 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Hexachloroethane

C. Chlorinated Phenols 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Parametachlorocresol (4-chloro-3-methyl phenol)

D. Other Chlorinated Organics Chloroform (trichloromethane) Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane) Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (mixed) 2-chloronaphthalene 3,3-dichlorobenzidine l,l-dichloroethylene 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene 1,2-dichloropropane 1,2-dichloropropylene (1,3-dichloropropene) Tetrachloroethylene Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride (chloroethylene) Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)

E. Haloethers 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2-bromophenyl phenyl ether Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether

F. Halomethanes Methylene chloride (dichloromethane) Methyl chloride (chloromethane)

1Methyl Bromide (bromomethane) Bromoform (tribromomethane) Dichlorobromomethane Chlorodibromomethane

G. Nitrosamines N-nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosodiphenylamine N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine

H. Phenols (other than chlorinated) 2-nitrophenol 4-nitrophenol 2,4-dinitrophenol 4.6-dinitro-o-cresol (4.6-dinitro-2-methylphenol) Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2,4-dimethylphenol

I. Phthalate Esters Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Butyl benzyl phthalate Di-N-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate

J. Polnuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Acenaphthene 1,2-benzanthracene (benzo(a) anthracene) Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzo-pyrene) 3,4-benzofluoranthene (benzo(b) fluoranthene) 11.12-benzofluoranthene (benzo(k) fluoranthene) Chrysene Acenaphthalene Anthracene 1,12-benzoperylene (bonze(ghi) perylene) Fluorene Fluoranthene Phenanthrene 1,2,5,6-bibenzanthracene (dibenzo(ah) anthracene) Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene (2,3-o-phenylene pyrene) Pyrene

K. Pesticides and Metabolites Aldrin Dieldrin Chlordane (technical mixture and metobolites) Alpha-endosulfan Beta-endosulfan Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide (BHC-hexachlorocyclohexane)

2Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC (Lindane) Delta-BHC Toxaphene

L. DDTand Metabolites 4,4-DDT 4.4-DDE (p.p-DDX) 4,4-DDD (p,p-TDE)

M.Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242) PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254) PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221) PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232) PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248) PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260) PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)

N. Other Organics Acrolein Acrylonitrile Benzene Benzidine 2,4-dinitrotoluene 2,6-dinitrotoluene 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Ethylbenzene Isophorone Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Toluene

0. Inorganics Antimony Arsenic Asbestos Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Cyanide, total Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc

3
# C_2015204EN.01001801.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/18

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN SYSTEMIC RISK BOARD

of 1 June 2015

on the appointment of the Data Protection Officer of the European Systemic Risk Board

(ESRB/2015/1)

(2015/C 204/06)

THE GENERAL BOARD OF THE EUROPEAN SYSTEMIC RISK BOARD,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (1),

1

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (2), and in particular Article 24 thereof,

2

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1096/2010 of 17 November 2010 conferring specific tasks upon the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board (3), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

3

Having regard to Decision ESRB/2012/1 of the European Systemic Risk Board of 13 July 2012 implementing rules on data protection at the European Systemic Risk Board (4), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

4

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Ms. Barbara Eggl is appointed as Data Protection Officer (DPO) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) with effect from 1 June 2015 until 31 May 2017. Ms. Eggl is appointed as the ESRB’s DPO in her capacity as member of staff and DPO of the European Central Bank.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 1 June 2015.

The Chair of the ESRB

Mario DRAGHI

---

(1)  OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 162.

3

(4)  OJ C 286, 22.9.2012, p. 16.

4

---