alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory P. Chandler, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Gregory P. ChandlerGregory
      P. ChandlerChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      25, 2009
CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.2 I, Frank M. Jerneycic, certify that: 1.
I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Learning Care Group, Inc.;  2.
Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;  3.
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this Quarterly Report;  4.
The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly
Report is being prepared;  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report based on such evaluation; and  c)
disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;  5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):  a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: September 1, 2005  /s/
      Frank M. Jerneycic
      
      
          Frank M. Jerneycic, Chief Financial
          Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 99.2
                                  ------------



                                      13

<PAGE>

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S
               -------------------------------------------------
           ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
           --------------------------------------------------------
            SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
            -------------------------------------------------------
                               MORTGAGE BANKERS
                               ----------------



Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) ("the Company") compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of
and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying
management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CHL) complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 7, 2002



                                      14
# Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649) (9/14) Standard Document(31.17 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649) Overview(512.43 KB)

Structures for Wildlife (No.) (649) Network Effects Diagram(170.07 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
October 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation Ditch Lining (Code 428) 

An irrigation ditch, canal, or lateral, lined with an impervious

material or a chemical treatment. 

Practice Information 

An irrigation ditch lining practice may be applied as part of

a resource management system to achieve improved

conveyance of irrigation water, prevent waterlogging of

land, maintain water quality, prevent erosion, reduce water

loss, and reduce energy use. 

This practice applies to constructed ditches that are subject to erosion or excessive seepage and are

integral parts of an irrigation water distribution or conveyance system. 

An irrigation ditch lining practice applies where water supplies and irrigation deliveries for the area

served are sufficient to make irrigation practical for the crops to be grown and the irrigation water

application methods to be used. 

This practice does not apply to natural streams 

An irrigation ditch lining will require maintenance over the expected life of the practice. 

Common Associated Practices 

Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Irrigation Ditch Lining (Code 428) is commonly applied with

CPSs such as Irrigation Water Management (Code 449), Irrigation System, Microirrigation (Code

441), Sprinkler System (Code 442), Irrigation System, Surface and Subsurface (Code 443), Irrigation

Storage Reservoir (Code 436), Water Well (Code 642), Structure for Water Control (Code 587), and

Irrigation Canal or Lining (Code 320). 

For further information contact your local NRCS field office.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

In connection with the Annual Report of New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Parris H. Holmes, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)      The Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings Corp.

 

|      |                      |   |   |                            |
|-----------|---------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
| By:  | /s/ PARRIS H. HOLMES, JR. |   |   | Date:  March 25, 2003 |
|      |                           |   |   |                            |

| Parris H. Holmes, Jr.Chairman of the Board of DirectorsChief Executive Officer |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|

 

 

----
#### Karl BOEHM et al., Appellants, v. OFFICE OF ALIEN PROPERTY, Appellee.

No. 18601.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 1, 1965.

Decided Feb. 18, 1965.

Mr. Thomas A. Ziebarth, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mr. John Eldridge, Atty., Dept, of Justice, for appellee. Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas and Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Alan S. Rosenthal and Harvey L. Zuckman, Attys., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief for appellee.

Before Danaher, Bastían and Wright, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This action was filed in the District Court under Section 34(f) of the Trading With The Enemy Act1 to review the dismissal by the Director of the Office of Alien Property of appellant’s claim against vested property of the Deutsche Reichsbank for damage caused him and his two sons by the illegal acts of the German Government.

On December 7, 1960, a voluntary stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41, FED.R.CIV.P., was signed and filed by appellant. On February 6, 1964, appellant filed a motion to vacate the voluntary dismissal on the ground that he was induced by mistake to consent thereto. The District Court denied the motion, and appellant here alleges that it abused its discretion in so doing.

> ing prejudice arising from a possible conflict of interest deriving from Laughlin’s dual status.

*195 Since appellant’s motion alleges mistake as the basis for relief, the one-year limitation under Rule 60(b) (1), Fed.R.Civ.P., is applicable. Here the motion was filed more than three years after the dismissal of his action. Appellant’s argument that the dismissal may also be vacated under Rule 60(b) (6), Fed.R.Civ.P., which permits the setting aside of final judgments for “any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment,” is without merit. There is no showing here of the extraordinary circumstances required for relief under Rule 60(b) (6). See Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193, 202, 71 S.Ct. 209, 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950).

Affirmed.

1

. 60 Stat. 927, 50 U.S.C.App. § 34(f).
****

----

**Exhibit 13.2.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian Co., Ltd. .  (the "Company") on amended  Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, In Beom Park,  Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

> 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result    of operations of the Company. 

By: /s/ *In Beom  Park                  *  Name: In Beom Park  Title: Director   Date: November 8 ,  2005

----
*October 11, 1938.*

#### Sherwood State Bank, Respondent, vs. Zahn, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Geo. C. Hume*of Chilton.

For the respondent: *Anthony E. Madler*of Chilton.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 10, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William D. Davis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William D. Davis

William D. Davis, President and
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from Atlantic
International  Entertainment,  Ltd.'s financial  statements as of March 31, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       4,557,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         (595,936)
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    1,526,456
<PP&E>                                                              3,839,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        624,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      7,539,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,974,553
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                                9,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          5,513,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        7,539,043
<SALES>                                                             1,155,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    1,155,041
<CGS>                                                                 151,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         690,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     10,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       306,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          (27,412)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   278,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          278,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             .03
        

</TABLE>
# L_2016087EN.01003502.xml

| 2.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 29 December 2015
  )

On page 565, Article 2(3) is replaced as follows:

‘3.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, until the date of deployment of the first phase of the upgrading of the BTI system and the Surveillance 2 system, the codes and formats of Annex A shall not apply and the respective codes and formats shall be those set out in Annexes 2-5 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341 (1).

By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, until the date of the upgrading of the AEO system, the codes and formats of Annex A shall not apply and the respective codes and formats shall be those set out in Annexes 6-7 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341.

By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, until the dates of deployment or upgrading of the relevant IT systems as set out in Annex 1 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341, the formats and codes set out in Annex B shall be optional for Member States.

Until the dates of deployment or upgrading of the relevant IT systems as set out in Annex 1 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341, the formats and codes required for declarations, notifications and proof of customs status shall be subject to the data requirements set out in Annex 9 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341.

Until the respective dates of the deployment of the UCC Automated Export System and the upgrading of the National Import Systems, as referred to in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/255/EU (2), Member States shall ensure that the codes and formats for the notification of presentation allow the presentation of goods in accordance with Article 139 of the Code.’

On page 565, footnote 1 is replaced as follows:

| ‘(1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341 of 17 December 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards transitional rules for certain provisions of the Union Customs Code where the relevant electronic systems are not yet operational and amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 (OJ L 69, 15.3.2016, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

---
# C_2004118EN.01004001.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/40

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 March 2004

in Case T-66/02, Idiotiko Institouto Epaggelmatikis Katartisis N. Avgerinopoulou Anagnorismenes Technikes Idiotikes Epaggelmatikes Scholes AE, Panellinia Enosi Idiotikon Institouton Epaggelmatikis Katarsis and Panellinia Enosi Idiotikis Technikis Epaggelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katarstisis v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Structural Funds - Community support - Operational programme - Request for amendment - Application for a declaration of failure to act - Adoption of a position terminating such failure to act - No need to give judgment)

(2004/C 118/86)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case T-66/02, Idiotiko Institouto Epaggelmatikis Katartisis N. Avgerinopoulou Anagnorismenes Technikes Idiotikes Epaggelmatikes Scholes AE, Panellinia Enosi Idiotikon Institouton Epaggelmatikis Katarsis and Panellinia Enosi Idiotikis Technikis Epaggelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katarstisis, established in Athens, Greece, represented by T. Antoniou and C. Tsiliotis, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Condou-Durande and L. Flynn) - Application for a declaration of failure to act based on Article 232 EC and seeking a declaration that the Commission failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161 p.1) and the EC Treaty by failing to remove the unlawful discrimination between private and public professional training bodies in Greece, on the basis that only the latter are financed by the third Community support network and in particular the operational programme Initial Education and Professional Training - the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. legal, President and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 15 March 2004, in which it

| 1 | Finds that there is no need to give judgement in this case; |
| --- | --- |

1

Finds that there is no need to give judgement in this case;

| 2 | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C109 of 4.5.2002

1

---