Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Notices 5875 

76See proposed Rule 1081(ii)(B)(4). The 

described scenario applies in a simple Solicitation 

Auction. In a Complex Solicitation Auction, the 

auction would end early any time there is a trading 

halt on the Exchange in any component of the 

Complex Agency Order. Id. 

77See proposed Rule 1081(ii)(C). 

78 In explaining generally why Responses and 

other interest present in the system would not be 

considered for trading against the Agency Order in 

the case of a trading halt—which, the Commission 

notes, would apply even when the aggregate of such 

Responses and other interest was sufficient to fill 

the entire Agency Order at an improved price—the 

Exchange stated that ‘‘this is appropriate since the 

participants representing tradable interest in the 

Solicitation Auction have not ‘stopped’ the Agency 

Order in its entirety and would have no means after 

the auction executions occur to offset the trading 

risk they would incur because the market is halted 

if they were permitted to trade against the Agency 

Order in this instance.’’ 79 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57). 

Order. On the other exchange, while the 

Solicited Order is cancelled, the public 

customer order at the stop price and the 

improving interest trade against the 

Agency Order. Under the Phlx’s 

proposal, the Agency Order and 

Solicited Order are cancelled. 

The Exchange explains that its system 

‘‘only permits the Solicited Order and 

no other interest to trade against the 

Agency Order at the stop price, thus 

ensuring that the Agency Order receives 

a better priced execution than the stop 

price when trading against interest other 

than the Solicited Order.’’ The 

Commission notes that, when there is a 

public customer order on the book at the 

stop price, the Solicited Order would 

not be permitted to trade in any case, 

because a public customer on the book 

cannot be bypassed by another order. 

The Commission seeks comment on the 

aspect of the Exchange’s proposal that 

would cancel the Agency Order and the 

Solicited Order in a case where there is 

public customer interest at the stop 

price, and together with any improving 

interest, the Agency Order otherwise 

could be satisfied. 

The Commission further seeks 

commenters’ views regarding the 

proposal’s provisions regarding 

participation and priority in the 

allocation of the Agency Order, with 

respect to the Solicited Order and with 

respect to Responses, quotes and orders. 

For example, under the proposal, one 

of the scenarios in which a Solicitation 

Auction would conclude early is if there 

is a trading halt on the Exchange in the 

option series that is the subject of the 

auction.76 In such case, the Exchange’s 

proposal provides that the entire 

Agency Order would be executed solely 

against the Solicited Order at the stop 

price, and any unexecuted Responses 

would be cancelled.77 The Commission 

notes that there can be instances in 

which an unrelated order on the side 

opposite the Agency Order has arrived 

on the Exchange and is resting on the 

book at a price that is superior to the 

stop price (from the point of view of the 

Agency Order) when the trading halt 

occurs. By crossing the Agency Order 

against the Solicited Order at the stop 

price in this situation, the Exchange 

would be executing a trade at a price 

that is inferior to a price on the 

Exchange’s book. As noted above, the 

Exchange believes that public customer 

interest submitted to Phlx after 

submission of the Agency and Solicited 

Orders but prior to the trading halt 

should not prevent the Agency Order 

from being executed at the stop price 

since such public customer interest was 

not present at the time the Agency 

Order was ‘stopped’ by the Solicited 

Order.78 The Commission solicits 

comment on this functionality and the 

Exchange’s rationale. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments regarding whether the 

proposed rule change should be 

approved or disapproved by [insert date 

21 days from publication in the Federal 

Register]. Any person who wishes to file 

a rebuttal to any other person’s 

submission must file that rebuttal by 

[insert date 35 days from publication in 

the Federal Register]. 

Comments may be submitted by any 

of the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

Phlx–2014–66 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities 

and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street 

NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2014–66. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

publicly available. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– 

2014–66 and should be submitted on or 

before February 24, 2015. If comments 

are received, any rebuttal comments 

should be submitted by March 10, 2015. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.79

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02017 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Reporting and Recordkeeping 

Requirements Under OMB Review 

AGENCY: Small Business Administration. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Small Business 

Administration (SBA) is publishing this 

notice to comply with requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), which requires 

agencies to submit proposed reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements to 

OMB for review and approval, and to 

publish a notice in the Federal Register 

notifying the public that the agency has 

made such a submission. This notice 

also allows an additional 30 days for 

public comments. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

March 5, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to 

the information collection by name and/ 

or OMB Control Number and should be 

sent to: Agency Clearance Officer, Curtis 

Rich, Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street SW., 5th Floor, 

Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk 

Officer, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503. 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5876 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Notices 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 

(202) 205–7030 curtis.rich@sba.gov. A 

copy of the Form OMB 83–1, supporting 

statement, and other documents 

submitted to OMB for review may be 

obtained from the Agency Clearance 

Officer. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Governor of the State, U.S. territory or 

possession affected by a disaster 

submits this information collection to 

request that SBA issue a disaster 

declaration. The information identifies 

the time, place and nature of the 

incident and helps SBA to determine 

whether the regulatory criteria for a 

disaster declaration have been met, and 

disaster assistance can be made 

available to the affected region. 

Solicitation of Public Comments: 

Comments may be submitted on (a) 

whether the collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to properly 

perform its functions; (b) whether the 

burden estimates are accurate; (c) 

whether there are ways to minimize the 

burden, including through the use of 

automated techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and (d) whether 

there are ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information. 

Summary of Information Collections: 

(1) Title: Disaster Business 

Application. 

Description of Respondents: Governs 

Request for Disaster Declaration. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Estimated Annual Respondents: 31. 

Estimated Annual Responses: 58. 

Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 

1,160. 

Curtis B. Rich, 

Management Analyst. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01993 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Eagle Fund III–A, L.P.; License No. 07/07– 

0117] 

Notice Seeking Exemption Under 

Section 312 of the Small Business 

Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest 

Notice is hereby given that Eagle 

Fund III–A, L.P., 101 S. Hanley Road, 

Suite 1250, St. Louis, Missouri 63105, a 

Federal Licensee under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended (the ‘‘Act’’), in connection 

with the financing of a small concern, 

has sought an exemption under Section 

312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730, 

Financings which Constitute Conflicts 

of Interest, of the Small Business 

Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 

Regulations. Eagle Fund III–A, L.P., 

provided a loan to Net Direct Merchants 

LLC, (‘‘Net Direct’’), 217 North 

Seminary Street, Florence AL, 35630. 

The financing was contemplated to 

provide capital that contributes to the 

growth and overall sound financing of 

Net Direct. 

The financing is brought within the 

purview of § 107.730(a)(1) because Eagle 

Fund II, L.P., an Associate of Eagle Fund 

III–A, L.P. as defined in § 107.50, owns 

a ten percent or greater equity interest 

in Net Direct. Accordingly, Net Direct is 

considered an Associate of Eagle Fund 

III–A, L.P. 

Notice is hereby given that any 

interested person may submit written 

comments on the transaction to the 

Associate Administrator, Office of 

Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 Third 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

Javier E. Saade, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment 

and Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02028 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Eagle Fund III, L.P.; License No. 07/07– 

0116] 

Notice Seeking Exemption Under 

Section 312 of the Small Business 

Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest 

Notice is hereby given that Eagle 

Fund III, L.P., 101 S. Hanley Road, Suite 

1250, St. Louis, Missouri 63105, a 

Federal Licensee under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended (the ‘‘Act’’), in connection 

with the financing of a small concern, 

has sought an exemption under Section 

312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730, 

Financings which Constitute Conflicts 

of Interest, of the Small Business 

Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 

Regulations. Eagle Fund III, L.P., 

provided a loan to Net Direct Merchants 

LLC, (‘‘Net Direct’’), 217 North 

Seminary Street, Florence AL, 35630. 

The financing was contemplated to 

provide capital that contributes to the 

growth and overall sound financing of 

Net Direct. 

The financing is brought within the 

purview of § 107.730(a)(1) because Eagle 

Fund II, L.P., an Associate of Eagle Fund 

III, L.P. as defined in § 107.50, owns a 

ten percent or greater equity interest in 

Net Direct. Accordingly, Net Direct is 

considered an Associate of Eagle Fund 

III, L.P. 

Notice is hereby given that any 

interested person may submit written 

comments on the transaction to the 

Associate Administrator, Office of 

Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 Third 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

Javier E. Saade, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment 

and Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02030 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Surrender of License of Small 

Business Investment Company 

Pursuant to the authority granted to 

the United States Small Business 

Administration under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended, under Section 309 of the Act 

and Section 107.1900 of the Small 

Business Administration Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 

function as a small business investment 

company under the Small Business 

Investment Company License No. 03/

73–0214 issued to Virginia Capital SBIC, 

LP, said license is hereby declared null 

and void. 

United States Small Business 

Administration. 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Javier E. Saade, 

Associate Administrator for Investment and 

Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01992 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Research and Technology 

[Docket Number: OST–2014–0112] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activity; Response to Comments on 

Notice of Request for Approval To 

Collect New Information: Voluntary 

Near Miss Reporting in Oil and Gas 

Operations on the Outer Continental 

Shelf 

AGENCY: Bureau of Transportation 

Statistics (BTS), Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Research and Technology 

(OST–R), U.S. Department of 

Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice; response to comments. 

SUMMARY: On July 2, 2014, the Bureau 

of Transportation Statistics (BTS) 

announced its intention in a Federal 

Register Notice (79 FR 37837) to request 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) approve the following 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES