alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Wyoming State Office

100 East B St. 3rd FloorCasperWY82601

307-233-6750

PO Box 33124CasperWY82602

Wyoming

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Contact 
-  State Office Contacts 
-  Wyoming 
-  Wyoming State Office 

NRCS staff are dedicated to natural resource conservation. They live and work in the communities they service,  providing technical expertise and financial assistance to Wyoming's farmers, ranchers, forest land-owners, and other land stewards. NRCS employees help people help the land.

## **Welcome to NRCS in Wyoming!**

### ***Jackie Byam, State Conservationist***

Wyoming NRCS, led by our State Conservationist and our State Leadership Team. XXXX

----

## Key Contacts

### Jackie Byam

                -    307-233-6750 
                -    jackie.byam@usda.gov 

### Shelly Weckler

                -    307-233-6750 
                -    shelly.weckler@usda.gov 

### Alyssa Ludeke

                -    307-233-6759 
                -    alyssa.ludeke@usda.gov 

### James Bauchert

                -    307-233-6784 
                -    james.bauchert@usda.gov 

### Katie Vaporis

                -    307-233-6760 
                -    katelyn.vaporis@usda.gov 

### Shawn Follum, P.E. 

                -    307-233-6748 
                -    shawn.follum@usda.gov 

### Andi Neugebauer-Bailey

                -    307-233-6763 
                -    andi.neugebauer-bailey@usda.gov 

### Jeff Goats

                -    307-233-6768 
                -    jeff.goats@usda.gov 

### Rusty Schwartz

                -    307-624-3159 
                -    rusty.schwartz@usda.gov 

### Jake Hogan

                -    307-240-3204 
                -    jake.hogan@usda.gov 

### Brian Jensen

                -    307-233-6740 
                -    brian.m.jensen@usda.gov 

----

##   Employee Directory
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Zalicus Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify that to their knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    MARK H.N.
CORRIGANMark H.N. CorriganPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)/S/    JUSTIN A.
RENZJustin A. RenzSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)


Dated: March 10, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                ------------




                                                                 TANNER + CO.
                                                 Certified Public Accountants
                                                675 East 500 South, Suite 640
                                                   Salt Lake City, Utah 84102



                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") dated January 23, 1998
of our report dated January 19, 1996, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1995, which appears
on page F-1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997, and to the reference of our firm under the caption
"Experts" in the Prospectus.


                                                 /s/ Tanner + Co.


Salt Lake City, Utah
April 15, 1998
#### Pleva, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.

*January 12*

February *7, 1933.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *.Shaw, Muskat & Paitlsen*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Carl Muskat.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Hammersley & Torke*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Charles Ham-mersley.*

Fritz, J.

This case involves the same facts and questions of law as in the companion case of *Zilles v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.,*which is decided herewith *(ante,*p. 564, 246 N. W. 693). The decision in that case rules this case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Clive Kabatznik
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Clive Kabatznik
                                              Chief ExecutiveOfficer
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Date: May 12, 2004



                                       21
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31012

BRANDON HAYNES Petitioner-Appellee

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary Respondent-Appellant

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

- - - - - ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion November 27, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001,

_____ F.3d

____ ) (March 4, 2002) BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES,

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Wayne Lee, certify that: 

 

     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Travelzoo Inc.; 

 

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

 

Date:  May 6, 2010                                                                                                                            /s/ Wayne Lee   

                                                                                                                                                 Wayne Lee

                                                                                                                   *Chief Financial Officer*

** 

----
# L_2015092EN.01001901.xml

| 8.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/551

of 24 March 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Miel des Cévennes (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Miel des Cévennes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Miel des Cévennes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Miel des Cévennes’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Miel des Cévennes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Miel des Cévennes’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.) as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 412, 19.11.2014, p. 4.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Exhibit 10.60.0

                        Amendment to Employment Agreement

         This Amendment to Employment Agreement ("Amendment") is entered into as
of 9 July 2003 ("Effective Date"), by and between Kirk A. Benson (the
"Employee") and Headwaters Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

         Employee and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement as of
October 25, 2002. The parties hereby amend the Employment Agreement by deleting
sections 2(c)(i), (ii), and (iii) in their entirety and replacing them with the
following:

         (c) Stock Option Grants.

         (i)      First 2003 Grant. On or promptly after the Effective Date, the
                  Company shall grant the Employee a stock option under the 2003
                  Headwaters Incorporated Stock Incentive Plan for 100,000
                  shares of the Company's Common Stock. The option granted under
                  this Paragraph (i) shall become exercisable in three equal
                  installments on the date of grant, 31 March 2004, and 31 March
                  2005, provided that the Employee's Employment continues until
                  the date in question.

         (ii)     Second 2003 Grant. On or promptly after the Effective Date,
                  the Company shall grant the Employee a stock option under the
                  2003 Headwaters Incorporated Stock Incentive Plan for 75,000
                  shares of the Company's Common Stock. The option granted under
                  this Paragraph (ii) shall become exercisable in three equal
                  installments on 31 March 2004, 31 March 2005, and 31 March
                  2006, provided that the Employee's Employment continues until
                  the date in question.

         (iii)    April 2004 Grant. Subject to availability under the 2003
                  Headwaters Incorporated Stock Incentive Plan or such other
                  stock incentive plan of the Company approved by the
                  stockholders, on or promptly after 24 April 2004, the Company
                  shall grant the Employee a stock option for 75,000 shares of
                  the Company's Common Stock. The option granted under this
                  Paragraph (iii) shall become exercisable in three equal
                  installments on 31 March 2005, 31 March 2006, and 31 March
                  2007, provided that the Employee's Employment continues until
                  the date in question.

         All other terms of Employment Agreement remain unchanged.


                           [Signatures on next page.]

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BOTH OF THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS Amendment,
in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and
year first above written.



/s/ Kirk A. Benson
------------------------
Kirk A. Benson


Headwaters Incorporated



By: /s/ James A. Herickhoff
-----------------------------------------
Title: Chairman, Compensation Committee
#### David Worth *v.*Thomas Fentress.

From Randolph.

A. plea of set off, is in nature of a cross action, and the Plaintiff may reply several matters therein.

In practice, where no replication is actually entered, a general replication is understood.

*Therefore,*when the Defendant pleaded a set off and other pleas, and no replication to either was entered, and after a verdict and new trial awarded, leave was given the Plaintiff to reply the statute of limitations, to the plea of set off, It was held, that this was no waiver of the general replication before presumed, but that the Plaintiff might on the second trial, insist on both.

Debt upon bond, to which fhe pleas were *nonestfac-tum, payment, and a set off.*There had been two trials in the Court below $ at the first, the Plaintiff obtained a verdict, which was set aside and leate given him to reply the statute of limitations to the plea of set off — there was no entry of any other replication to either of the pleas.

On the second trial, the Plaintiff proved that the debt attempted to be set off, had been taken into account by arbitrators upon some other dispute, and that the Defendant had been allowed the foil benefit of it. The Counsel for the Defendant objected to this evidence, insisting that by replying specially, the Plaintiff bad waived the general replication, which was presumed to have been taken, and was estopped to deny the existence of the set off. But his honor Judge Dahtbx, being of a different opinion, the Plaintiff had a verdict and the Defendant appealed.

*.Nash,*for the Defendant.

*Wilson,*contra.

IIeNdersoN, Judge.

There was no special replication put in to the Defendant’s pleas of *payment and set off.*It was understood according to our practice, that they were not confessed and avoided, hut denied ; and *420under (!iat impression, the party went to trial. When afterwards the Defendant by leave of the Court, added the special replication of (ho statute of limitations to the pjea ()j- set 0j^ j ^() n0(. (.()nc,¡de.r it was by any means an abandonment of the general replication to that plea ; in other words, that the existence of the set off was thereby admitted ; hut that it still remained denied under the general replication, which was presumed to have been entered. It is true, that if there could have been but one replication to the plea of set off, the special replication afterwards entered, must have beeti an abandonment of the then existing general one. But the plea of set off is viewed as an action on the part of the Defendant, authorised in that form, by the statute introducing it, and consequently the Plaintiff’s replication to it, in the nature of a plea ; and therefore the Plaintiff may make the same defences to it by way of replication, as he could were an action brought on it against him. It is therefore no more a waiver of the former replication, than in an action on the set off, the addition of the plea of the statute of limitations would be a waiver of the general issue.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SAMUEL LLOYD, a/k/a Sammy , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00036

- MSD

- FBS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 8, 2024 Decided: July 19, 2024

Before GREGORY and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Samuel Lloyd , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6798 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/19/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Samuel Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to be released from home confinement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Lloyd , No. 2:11

- cr 00036

- MSD

- FBS

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6798 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/19/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          595649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                595649
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1872808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            72571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      21379540
<OTHER-SE>                                  (19579303)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1872808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                121534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Amendment to Employment Agreement - Stephen G. Newberry



 Exhibit 10.151 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into effective this 7th day of December, 2010 (the
“Effective Date”), by and between Lam Research Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Stephen G. Newberry (the “Executive”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and
the Company (the “Parties”) previously entered into an employment agreement effective July 1, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement” and, as amended hereby, the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, in order to address a revision to the title of the Executive, the Parties desire to amend the Employment
Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended and
restated to read, in its entirety, as follows: 
 “Position. During the Employment Period (as defined in
Section 2(a) below), the Executive shall serve as the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and in such capacity the Executive shall perform the duties and responsibilities as the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may, from time to time, reasonably assign to Executive, in all cases to be consistent with Executive’s offices and positions.” 
 [Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Agreement effective as of the day
and year first written above. 
  

			
	LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Sarah A. O’Dowd
	Name:	 	Sarah A. O’Dowd
	Title:	 	Group Vice President, HR and Chief Legal Officer
		
	Dated:	 	December 7, 2010


  

			
	
		
		 	/s/ Stephen G. Newberry
		 	Stephen G. Newberry


			
		
	Dated:	 	December 7, 2010


  
 Page 2
EXHIBIT
23.2


McGladrey &
Pullen


Certified Public
Accountants




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 To the
Board of Directors
 Ames
National Corporation
 Ames,
Iowa
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 of Ames National Corporation of our report, dated January 20, 2006 related
to our audits of the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Ames National Corporation for the year ended December 30,
2007.





/s/
McGladrey & Pullen LLP








Des
Moines, Iowa


March 14,
2008