alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-10-00049-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

IGNACIO CISNEROS, APPELLANT,

v.

MARTHA IMELDA CISNEROS, APPELLEE. 

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 197th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Ignacio Cisneros, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment

entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number

2006-12-5712-C. Judgment in this cause was signed on September 9, 2009. No motion
2

for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s

notice of appeal was due on October 9, 2009, but was not filed until January 20, 2010. 

On February 10, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that

steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that,

if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter,

the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

 The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s

failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice,

is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly,

the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

18th day of March, 2010.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Chattem Chemicals, Inc. applied to be registered as an importer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. registration as an importer of those controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated September 26, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 7, 2014, 79 FR 60501, Chattem Chemicals, Inc., 3801 St. Elmo Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37409, applied to be registered as an importer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted for this notice. Comments and requests for hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not appropriate. 72 FR 3417, (January 25, 2007). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and determined that the registration of Chattem Chemicals, Inc. to import those basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above-named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled Substance
ScheduleMethamphetamine (1105)
II4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IIOpium, raw (9600)
IIPoppy Straw Concentrate (9670)
IITapentadol (9780)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to manufacture bulk controlled substances for sale to its customers. The company plans to import an intermediate form of tapentadol (9780), to bulk manufacture tapentadol for distribution to its customers. On October 16, 2014, Chattem Chemicals, Inc. withdrew its request for the addition of thebaine (9333) to this registration. Dated: January 28, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-02244 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety and Occupational Health Program For Managers and Supervisors: What YOU Should Know (NUREG/BR-0098, Revision 7)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Purpose

Download complete document 
        - NUREG/BR-0098, Revision 7 (PDF - 743 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 2015

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Purpose

The purpose of U.S. NRC NUREG/BR-0098, Revision 7, is to inform managers and supervisors of actions they are responsible for to maintain agency compliance with the NRC Safety and Occupational Health Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARY                                                                             JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                                                             -----------------------------
<S>                                                                                    <C>
Multiple Zones Austria GesmbH...................................................       Austria
The Mac Zone PC Zone S.A........................................................       France
Multiple Zones Germany GmbH.....................................................       Germany
Multiple Zones Limited..........................................................       Great Britain
Multiple Zones India Private Ltd. (80% owned by Multiple Zones Mauritius Ltd.,
  a holding company wholly owned by Multiple Zones International, Inc.).........       India
Multiple Zones de Mexico, S.A. de C.V...........................................       Mexico
Multiple Zones Switzerland AG...................................................       Switzerland
</TABLE>
# Firebreak (Ft.) (394) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Firebreak (Ft.) (394) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Firebreak (Ft.) (394).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Firebreak (Ft.) (394) (11/22) Standard Document(37.45 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Firebreak (Ft.) (394) Overview(467.36 KB)

Firebreak (Ft.) (394) CPPE(24.85 KB)

Firebreak (Ft.) (394) Network Effects Diagram(34.7 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Firebreak

This video explores how Yvonne Knight-Carter of Moncks Corner, South Carolina, implemented the firebreak conservation practice on her forestland.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Technical Basis for a Proposed Expansion of Regulatory Guide 3.54 — Decay Heat Generation in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (NUREG/CR-6999)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6999 (PDF - 6.93 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2009**Date Published:** February 2010

**Prepared by:** I.C. Gauld and B.D. Murphy

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

 NRC Job Code Y6517

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes the technical basis for expanding the range of the current U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulatory guide for calculating decay heat power in an independent spent fuel storage installation (Regulatory Guide 3.54, Rev. 1) to include current high burnup fuel. As part of the expansion of the guide, a revised methodology is proposed to improve flexibility, enable increased accuracy, and cover a wider range of reactor operating histories. The methods are based more directly on the physics of decay heat generation and implement, as part of the proposed guide, procedures and data from consensus standards developed for calculating decay heat by the American National Standards Institute and the International Standards Organization, ANSI/ANS-5.1-2005 and ISO 10645:1992(E), respectively. The proposed guide is validated using experimental calorimeter decay heat data for 68 spent fuel assemblies measured in the United States and for 64 assemblies measured more recently in Sweden at the Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel. Validation of the methods beyond the range of the decay heat measurements is supported using experimental isotopic assay measurements of the dominant decay heatgenerating isotopes, obtained from destructive radiochemical analysis of spent fuel samples.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT 

JERRY DON FLIPPO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN JONES, Director,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-6081

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-01240-C)

(D. W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before KELLY, EBEL and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. 

 Jerry Flippo, a pro se litigant, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking 

relief from his Oklahoma convictions for attempted grand larceny and false personation. 

Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell issued a thorough analysis recommending Mr. Flippo’s 

petition be denied, and the district court adopted that recommendation in its entirety. The 

district court also denied Mr. Flippo’s requests to receive a certificate of appealability 

(“COA”) and to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Mr. Flippo now renews these 

 *

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, 

res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value 

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

August 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

requests. For the reasons that follow, we DENY his request for a COA, but we GRANT 

his request to proceed IFP. 

We will grant a COA “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial 

of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). “To meet this standard, a petitioner must 

demonstrate that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his 

constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve 

encouragement to proceed further.” Boutwell v. Keating, 399 F.3d 1203, 1211 (10th Cir. 2005) 

(quotation omitted). In this case, we do not think reasonable jurists could disagree with the 

thorough analysis of the magistrate judge, nor do we think his claims require further analysis. 

Thus, we deny Mr. Flippo’s COA based on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as 

adopted by the district court. 

 However, unlike the district court, we do not think Mr. Flippo filed his petition in 

bad faith. Therefore, we grant Mr. Flippo’s request to proceed IFP. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

David M. Ebel 

Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2097 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2097

To prevent the reclassification of certain ammunition as armor piercing 
                              ammunition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2017

Mr. Perry (for himself and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prevent the reclassification of certain ammunition as armor piercing 
                              ammunition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ATF Wrongful Reclassification Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN AMMUNITION AS ARMOR 
              PIERCING AMMUNITION.

    Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``may be used'' and 
        inserting ``is designed and intended by the manufacturer solely 
        for use''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)--
                    (A) by striking ``the Attorney General finds is 
                primarily intended'' and inserting ``is primarily 
                intended by the manufacturer''; and
                    (B) by striking ``sporting'' and inserting 
                ``lawful''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateRulemakingNRC Rules and Petitions

# Planned Rulemaking Activities - Rules

Return to Main page

            - Rules
            - Changes

### Changes Since Last Published

Download Rule Data

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 29, 2024
#### Adams *v.*Spear.

Debt, and *non est factum*pleaded : the bond was produced on the tria!, and appeared to be a bond in the penal "sum of six hundred and td-cuty-five pounds, with condition to pay one half of that sum. The writ was for the sum mentioned in the condition, and of course the decía-*246ration was supposed 'to be for the same sum. *Etper curiam,*the condition *;*no part of tife obligation, it is inserted for ilie benefit of the, obligor, to exempt him from the payment of the penalty if lie chose- to comply therewith ; but he has iiis option not to perform the condition, and to forfeit the bond if hr is so disposed — consequently the bond produced, which is for six hundred and twenty-five pounds, does not agree with the bond set forth in the declaration — but as it has been a practice agreed upon by the bar, to suffer an alteration in the writ when issued bv the Clerk as this was, where he has committed a mistake, we will now recommend to the opposite, attorney to consent to the alteration. However he would not consent to the alteration at present, hut agreed it should be made at any time after this day. — Whereupon by Consent a juror was withdrawn.

Note.— *Vide Anonymous, post*401, and the note to *Cowper*v. *Edwards’ Adm’r. ante*19.
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)Web-Based Licensing (WBL) System

# Help Desk Support for the Web-Based Licensing System

NRC has established a Help Desk to assist users by answering questions and resolving issues related to credentialing, login procedures, system use, transaction reporting, and any problems encountered in using the WBL. Users may also contact the Help Desk to submit system change requests (to remedy defects or enhance functionality). Each inquiry is logged and tracked for future reference. Help Desk availability is as follows:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Help Desk Support for the Web-Based Licensing System

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
---

Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 16, 2012

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Scott Wilson, CPG, do hereby consent to the
filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled August
2011 Summary Report on the Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated
August 25, 2011 in the Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and
the Annual Information Form of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the
Company) dated March 16, 2012.

I also consent to the use of my name in the
Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and Annual
Information Form dated March 16, 2012, and to the incorporation by reference of
this Annual Report on Form 40-F in the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement
(SEC File No. 333-158533).

| | By: | /s/ Scott Wilson                
| | --- | --------------------------------
| |     | Scott Wilson, CPG               
| |     | Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc.

---
# C_2004118EN.01004203.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/42

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 30 April 2004

in Case T-439/03 R, Ulrike Eppe v European Parliament (1)

1

(Interim measures - Competition procedure - Application for provisional measures - Admissibility)

(2004/C 118/93)

Language of the Case: German

In Case T-439/03 R, Ulrike Eppe, residing in Hanover (Germany), represented by D. Rogalla, lawyer, against the European Parliament (Agents: J. de Wachter and N. Lorenz), APPLICATION: (1) for the annulment of the procedure in Competition EUR/A/167/02 and its resumption with the participation of the applicant; and (2) for an order prohibiting the European Parliament from drawing up an aptitude list and recruiting staff on the strength of the results of that competition – the President of the Court of First Instance; Registrar: H. Jung, made an order on 30 April 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1) | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1)

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2) | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17. 4. 2004

1

---
CERTIFICATIONS  EXHIBIT 32 20-F ANNUAL REPORT  Filed May 2007  EXHIBIT 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of Rimfire Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Caulfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   ­­­­/s/ David A. Caulfield  Name: David A. Caulfield Title: Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2007   A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.        EXHIBIT 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of Rimfire Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dorothy G. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   ­­­­/s/ Dorothy G. Miller  Name: Dorothy G. Miller Title: Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2007   A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.