alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cynthia Oberdorf, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 334]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered February 11, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is granted, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the superior court information.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon her *Alford*plea *(see North Carolina v Alford,*400 US 25 [1970]), of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and petit larceny (§ 155.25). The sole contention on appeal is that County Court erred in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw her guilty plea. Although defendant failed to preserve for our review her contention that the court should not have accepted her *Alford*plea without insisting on a stronger factual recitation by the prosecution *(see People v Spulka,*285 AD2d 840 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 643 [2001]), we address the *1001contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). “In New York, such a plea is allowed only when, as in *Alford*itself, it is the product of a voluntary and rational choice, and the record before the court contains strong evidence of actual guilt” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 475 [2000]; *see People v Alexander,*97 NY2d 482, 486 n 3 [2002]). Here, the record establishes that the court ascertained that defendant was making a knowing and voluntary choice to waive indictment and plead guilty to the crimes charged in the superior court information (SCI). The record does not, however, contain the requisite evidence of defendant’s guilt of burglary or larceny, and thus we conclude that the court erred in accepting the plea *(see Alford,*400 US at 37; *Alexander,*97 NY2d at 486 n 3). We therefore reverse the judgment, grant defendant’s motion, vacate the plea, and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the SCI. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-30207 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Eric Wayne Hawkins, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Louisiana 

USDC No. 3:03-CR-194-1 

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Wayne 

Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hawkins has filed a response. We have reviewed 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

March 10, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-30207 Document: 00516233920 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
No. 20-30207 

2 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as 

well as Hawkins’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 20-30207 Document: 00516233920 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
<PAGE>
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-58629 and 333-70405 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-12243
and 333-12633 on Form S-8 of The North Face, Inc. of our report dated May 6,
1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The North Face, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
May 6, 1999
#### Bollmann, Respondent, vs. Rowe, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Freeman,*attorneys, and *Robert R. Freeman*and *Ronold A. Drechsler*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Hu.ghes & Reichenauer,*attorneys, and *Joseph A. Barly*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2004237EN.01000101.xml

| 24.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 September 2004

(2004/C 237/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2315 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4383 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68375 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0539 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5477 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,73 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,341 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,543 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6641 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4283 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3429 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 237 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,99 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 841 900 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7258 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5793 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6044 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8458 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0869 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 411,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9896 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2315

JPY

Japanese yen

136,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4383

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68375

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0539

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5477

ISK

Iceland króna

87,73

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,341

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,543

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6641

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4283

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3429

ROL

Romanian leu

41 237

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,99

SKK

Slovak koruna

40

TRL

Turkish lira

1 841 900

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7258

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5793

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6044

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8458

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0869

KRW

South Korean won

1 411,79

ZAR

South African rand

7,9896

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2073 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2073

To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
 immigration officers or agents of the Department of Homeland Security 
   from wearing clothing or other items bearing the word ``police''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
   Gallego, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Bonamici, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
Veasey, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Correa, Ms. Moore, Mrs. Torres, Ms. Michelle 
 Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, and 
 Mr. Serrano) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
 immigration officers or agents of the Department of Homeland Security 
   from wearing clothing or other items bearing the word ``police''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON IMMIGRATION OFFICER UNIFORMS.

    Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Immigration officers or agents of the Department of Homeland 
Security, including officers and agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall not wear any 
clothing, accessories, or other items on their person bearing the word 
`police' while performing duties under the immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Impax Laboratories, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 May 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Arthur A. Koch, Jr.Senior Vice President, Finance,
and Chief
Financial 
Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffInformation Technology/Information Management Strategic Plan (NUREG-1908)

# Information Technology/Information Management Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2008 – 2013 (NUREG-1908, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1908 (PDF - 1.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2008**Date Published:** April 2008

Office of Information ServicesU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Information Technology/Information Management (IT/IM) Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2008 – 2013 describes how IT/IM activities at the NRC contribute to the agency's mission. Section 1 covers the NRC's mission and responsibilities, Federal requirements for IT/IM planning, benefits of IT/IM strategic planning, and the relationship of this plan to other planning documents. Section 2 provides the environment and context for the plan. Sections 3 and 4 discuss the planning outcomes—the IT/IM program objective, vision, and strategic goals, and the strategies and measures associated with each of the goals. Section 5 describes the relationship of the IT/IM strategic planning process to other agency planning processes and to the Federal Electronic Government Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill

David K. Paylor, Director 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23218 Dear Mr. Paylor: 

### MA 

# r 

# i -ft

### Z013

On March 18,2013 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department ofEnvironmental Quality pertaining to the repeal ofthe National Low Emission Vehicle Program (Rev. M11). EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Brian Rehn, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2176, or at rehn.brian@epa.gov. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

n Sincerely,

# \'Jctv~c**·ESt;~** Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

't.J Printed on I00% recycled/recyclablepaper with I00% post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement
           of Operations included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year
           ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
           reference to such Financial Statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                                 1,015,960
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             69,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                               7,577
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,093,207
<PP&E>                                                   423,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                            55,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,742,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    150,548
<BONDS>                                                1,598,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     178
<OTHER-SE>                                                17,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,742,890
<SALES>                                                  242,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         242,140
<CGS>                                                    197,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            197,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         142,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        33,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (130,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (130,323)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (130,323)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.78)


</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 10 , 2022
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00286

- CR

RYAN RYDELL BONNER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 19

- CR

- 1881

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant appeals his conviction for retaliation

. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and dem onstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).2

A copy of counsel’s br ief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). On December 1, 2021, appellant filed a pro se response to co un sel’s brief.
W e have carefully reviewe d the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro
se response and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each cl aim ra ised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
T he judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel cons is ts of Justices Wise, Poissant and Wilson. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
# C_2004118EN.01001201.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-338/01: Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Directive 2001/44/EC - Choice of legal basis)

(2004/C 118/21)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-338/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: R. Lyal), with an address for service in Luxembourg, supported by European Parliament (Agents: R. Passos and A. Baas), with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Sims-Robertson and F. Florindo Gijón), supported by Ireland (Agents: D. O'Hagan, assisted by E. Fitzsimons SC, K. Maguire BL and D. Moloney BL), with an address for service in Luxembourg, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: J. Faltz), the Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes, V. Guimarães and Â. Seiça Neves), with an address for service in Luxembourg, and by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: J.E. Collins, assisted by D. Wyatt QC), with an address for service in Luxembourg — application for the annulment of Council Directive 2001/44/EC of 15 June 2001 amending Directive 76/308/EEC on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims resulting from operations forming part of the system of financing the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, and of agricultural levies and customs duties and in respect of value added tax and certain excise duties (OJ 2001 L 175, p. 17) and for the maintenance of the effects of that directive until the entry into force of a directive adopted on the correct legal basis — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur) and F. Macken, Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3) | Orders Ireland, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Portuguese Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Parliament to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders Ireland, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Portuguese Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Parliament to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 27.10.2001.

1

---
No. 86-916.

#### Carter *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2004173EN.01000101.xml

| 3.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,01 % on 1 July 2004

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 July 2004

(2004/C 173/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2148 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4344 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66870 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1785 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5208 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4925 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58150 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,840 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6568 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4260 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5119 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 617 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,8600 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,775 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 775 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7303 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6198 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4752 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9003 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0841 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 403,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5989 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2148

JPY

Japanese yen

132,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4344

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66870

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1785

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5208

ISK

Iceland króna

88,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4925

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58150

CZK

Czech koruna

31,840

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6568

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4260

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5119

ROL

Romanian leu

40 617

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,8600

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,775

TRL

Turkish lira

1 775 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7303

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6198

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4752

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9003

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0841

KRW

South Korean won

1 403,15

ZAR

South African rand

7,5989

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)

2

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---