alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI0:-.1

ANGUS S. KING, JR.

# JJC1&1l~ MARTHA KIRKPATRICK

AUGUSTA GOVERNOR

October 13, 1999
Ms. Susan Studlien, Deputy Director Office ofEcosystemProtection U.S. EPARegionI JFKFederal Building Boston, Ma. 02203-2211

## ~~~ Dear**~uu~u.** COMMISSIONER 

## OCT 1

# s1999 

## A\R QUAUI'f P\Jl.NNING 

## UN\T

Enclosed please find for your approval for inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan, amendments to the Chapter 111, Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control regulation. Apublic hearing was held on August 26, 1998 in accordance with federal and state administrative requirements. Public notice ofthe hearing was published in the Kennebec Journal on July 23, 1998 and in newspapers statewide on August 5, 1998. Substantial changes were made twice which required two 30-day comment periods. Public notice of the comment periods was published in newspapers statewide on December 30, 1999 and March 31, 1999. On August 19, 1999 the Board of Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 111 as revised. The Department is confidentthatthe enclosed submissionwill satisfy all EPArequirements.
The following administrativematerials are enclosed: 1. Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public hearing, dated June 25, 1998; 2. Copy of the public notice that appeared m the Kennebec Journal on July 23, 1998; 3. S4ffilllary Ofcomments and the Department's response; 4. Memorandum to the Board ofEnvironmental Protection requesting adoption of the rule, dated August4, 1999;

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA. MAINE 04333·0017 106 HOGAN ROAD**31~** CA:-ICO ROAD 1Z35 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287·7688 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 041l'3 PRESQUE ISLE, MAI:"E 04769-2094 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 9-+1·4570 FAX:**(2~'~7)** 941-4584 (207) 822·6300 FAX: (207)**~22-h303** (207) 704-0477 FAX: (2l"'7) 764·15075. Chapter 111, Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control as adopted by the Board ofEnvironmental Protection on August 19, 1999 and accepted by the Secretary of State with an effective date ofSeptember29, 1999; 6. The MAPA I form which provides certification by the Commissioner that the hearing was held August 26, 1998 and the Board of Environmental Protection lawfully adopted this rule on August 19, 1999 and certification that the Attorney General approved the rule as to form and legality; and 7. The August 26, 1998public hearing transcript. Should you have any questions, please contactCarolynWheeler at (207) 287-2437. Sincerely,

# c~~ BureauDirector DepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection Enclosures (7)
cc: Anne Arnold CarolynWheeler w/o encl. SIP file

,•
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2006
                                     /s/ ROBERT A. FERGUSON
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         Robert A. Ferguson
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Director
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51143

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIRO AMADOR-LUJAN, also known as Norberto

Barrios, also known as Saoul Amador-Lujan,

also known as Jairo Amador-Amador,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-1016-ALL-PM

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Jairo Amador-Lujan appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. AmadorLujan contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been
No. 03-51143

-2-

alleged in his indictment. Amador-Lujan maintains that he

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Amador-Lujan acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 3.03

                             HELPMATE ROBOTICS INC.

                CERTIFICATE AMENDING CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                BY ACTION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS


1. The name of the Corporation is HelpMate Robotics Inc.

2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is amended pursuant to
Section 33-797 of the Connecticut General Statutes, by the following resolution
recommended by the Board of Directors and adopted by the shareholders of the
Corporation:

"RESOLVED:        That Article 3 of the Certificate of Incorporation of
                  the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its
                  entirety as follows:

                       '3. The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall
                       consist of forty million (40,000,000) shares of common
                       stock without par value.'"

3. The date of adoption of the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was
April 9, 1998.

4. The vote of the shareholders of the Corporation in favor of the amendment to
the Certificate of Incorporation was asfollows:

Voting      Shares     Votes Entitled   Votes Indisputably     Undisputed Votes
Group     Outstanding    To Be Cast   Represented At Meeting  Favoring Amendment
-----     -----------    ----------   ----------------------  ------------------
Common
Stock       6,951,300     6,951,300         5,335,643            5,285,294

5. The number of votes cast in favor of the amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation by the holders of the common stock of the Corporation was
sufficient for approval by such voting group.

      Dated:   April 16, 1998.
                                                /s/Thomas K.Sweeny
                                                Thomas K. Sweeny, President
HomeNRC LibraryTraining Courses

# Fuel Cycle Processes Seminar 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, is offering the Fuel Cycle Processes course from Monday, September 18, 2023, through Thursday, September 21, 2023 from 9 AM to 4:45 PM, as a hybrid offering at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD. This course focuses on Fuel Operations, Safety Analysis, and Regulatory Topics. It provides familiarity with the nuclear fuel cycle from uranium mining to fuel fabrication to storage and disposal.

There will be an exam on Thursday after all course modules have been taught. Completion of the exam is required for those for whom this course is required for formal qualification (also may be used to grant 32 hours refresher training for qualified staff pending their supervisor’s approval).

If you would like to take this course, please register through the following Form. If, after registering, you find you cannot attend the class, please withdraw as soon as possible so those on the waiting list may be offered your seat in the class. Questions about this course should be directed to Jeff Griffis at the NRC Technical Training Center or Nicole Cortes at NRC HQ.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 24, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement State Training
          - Fuel Cycle Processes Seminar 

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 24, 2023
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2007

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Clive Kabatznik, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2007

| |                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                     
| | /s/ Clive Kabatznik                                                 
| |                                                                     
| | Clive Kabatznik                                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               
| | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                               HINES HORTICULTURE
                           CERITIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Claudia M. Pieropan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the4 Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that Exhibit 99.2:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirement section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained In the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                    By: /s/ Claudia M. Pieropan
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Claudia M. Pieropan
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

April 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1989

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.11

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              TIB BANK OF THE KEYS
                             SPLIT DOLLAR AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into this 16th day of December,
2003, by and between TIB BANK OF THE KEYS, a state-chartered commercial bank
located in Key Largo, Florida (the "Company"), and ________ (the "Executive").

         The Company and the Executive executed the Split-Dollar Agreement on
___________ (the "Agreement").

         The Company and the Executive, in accordance with Article 7 of the
Agreement, agree to eliminate all post-retirement split-dollar benefits by
amending the Agreement as follows:

                             AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 1

         Section 1.5 of the Agreement on "Normal Retirement Age" shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with nothing.

                             AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 2

         Section 2.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced by section 2.2 below:

         2.2 Executive's Interest. The Executive shall have the right to
designate the beneficiary of any remaining death proceeds of the Policy. The
Executive shall also have the right to elect and change settlement options that
may be permitted. Provided, however, the Executive, the Executive's transferee
or the Executive's beneficiary shall have no rights or interests in the Policy
with respect to that portion of the death proceeds designated in this section
2.2 upon the Executive's Termination of Service prior to a Change of Control.

         Section 2.4 of the Agreement on "Comparable Coverage" shall be deleted
in its entirety and replaced by section 2.4 below:

         2.4 So long as this Agreement remains in force, the Company shall
maintain the Policy in full force and effect and in no event shall the Company
amend, terminate or otherwise abrogate the Executive's interest in the Policy,
unless the Company replaces the Policy with a comparable insurance policy to
cover the benefit provided under this Agreement. The Policy or any comparable
policy shall be subject to the claims of the Company's creditors.

                             AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 7

          Article 7 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by Article 7
below:

                                    ARTICLE 7
                           AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION

       This Agreement may be amended or terminated by the Company at any time
prior to a Change of Control. However, subsequent to a Change of Control, the
Agreement may be amended or terminated only by a written agreement signed by the
Company and the Executive.

<PAGE>

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment the day and
year first above written.

EXECUTIVE:                                      COMPANY:

                                                TIB BANK OF THE KEYS

_____________________________       BY___________________________________

                                    TITLE _______________________________
# Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528) (3/17) Standard Document(70.92 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528) CPPE(26.45 KB)

Prescribed Grazing (Ac.) (528) Network Diagram(43.44 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Prescribed Grazing

This video explores how Kenny Sites in Sheridan, AR, is using this practice to manage the cattle on his ranch, increasing the utilization of the forage and increasing the stocking rate.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2014

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020
No. 91-5371.

#### Gonzalez *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Operating Experience Feedback Reports (NUREG-1275)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021