alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11

<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-1


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

         (i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master
         Servicers under the Agreement has been made under our supervision;
         and

         (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JENNIFER SANTIAGO AND SAMUEL SANTIAGO,

Respondents

v.

PHILLY TRAMPOLINE PARK, LLC I/P/A SKY ZONE, D/B/A SKY ZONE

TRAMPOLINE PARK D/B/A SKY ZONE PHILADELPHIA, SKY ZONE PHILADELPHIA, INC., SKY ZONE

TRAMPOLINE PARK A/K/A SKY ZONE
PHILADELPHIA,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 96 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED . The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that the arbitration provision set forth in the Participation Agreement signed by Respondent Mother Jennifer Santiago (“Respondent Mother”) is unenforceable as to the claims of Respondent Father Samuel R. Santiago (“Respondent Father”), where Respondent Mother was acting as the Respondent Father’s agent to the

extent the Parti cipation Agreement related to the Plaintiff Minor Isabella Santiago’s (“Respondent Minor”) use of Petitioners’ trampoline park.

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that the arbitration provision set forth in the Participation Agreement signed by R espondent Mother is unenforceable as to the claims of Respondent Minor, such that Respondent Minor may now disavow this arbitration provision and bring her claims

—[ 96 EAL 2023 ]

- 2 which fall squarely within the scope of the arbitration provision

— before a

court of law.

The Application for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae filed by Get Air Management,

Inc., the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform, the Pennsylvania Manufacturers’

Association, and the National Federation of Independent Business, Inc. is also

GRAN TED

.
* Pursuant to 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60614 Summary Calendar

VESSELIN MITKOV-VATKOV; TATIANA TODOROVA-TODOROVA,

Petitioners,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A74-315-988 and A74-315-989

July 24, 1998

Before JOHNSON, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioners Vesselin Mitkov-Vatkov and Tatiana TodorovaTodorova appeal the Board of Immigr ation Appeals’ (BIA) decision

affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny asylum and

withholding of deportation.

After a careful review of the record, the arguments and the

controlling authorities, we find that the B IA decision was

supported by substantial evidence. S ee Gomez-Mejia v. INS , 56 F.3d2

700, 702 (5th Cir. 1995). The petition for review is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                                 Memorandum of
                             Understanding between
                       The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
                                      And
                              K. Ivan F. Gothner


1.   The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Ashton") wish to
engage Mr. K. Ivan F. Gothner ("Gothner"), or a company controlled by Gothner,
as an investment banker, financial advisor and special consultant to Ashton's
Chief Executive Officer.

2.   In consideration for his services to Ashton, Gothner, will be paid an
initial cash retainer by Ashton of $20,000 and $10,000 on the first day of each
month hereafter.

     It is further understood and agreed that there may be "success fees"
associated with certain projects which Gothner may undertake for Ashton pursuant
to this memorandum of understanding. Any success fee will be agreed to by
Gothner and Ashton's Chief Executive Officer from time to time and as may be
appropriate.

3.   Ashton will reimburse Gothner for all of his reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses associated with the performance of his services to Ashton pursuant to
this memorandum of understanding.

4.   Gothner will perform such services and render such advise to Ashton as its
Chief Executive Officer may from time to time request and to which Gothner may
reasonably agree. These services will initially include, but not be limited to:

     i.    assistance in the development and drafting of business plans for
           Ashton and its operating units,
     ii.   assisting Ashton in its communications with the investment community
           and helping to raise the investment community's awareness of Ashton,
           its plans and strategy,
     iii.  evaluate financing strategies and identify financing alternatives for
           the support of Ashton and its subsidiaries business plans,
     iv.   support and advise Ashton and its management in negotiations with:
           sources of financing, acquisition targets and strategic partners.

5.   Pursuant to his work as an advisor to Ashton, Ashton will indemnify Gothner
or the company controlled by Gothner, as appropriate in a form and substance
mutually agreeable-





/s/ Fredric W. Rittereiser                        /s/ K.I.F. Gothner

Fredric W. Rittereiser                            K. Ivan F. Gothner
President & Chief Executive Officer

                                                                      2 May 1997
S4S 

Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement 

and Proceedings, 

C-70 

U.S Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W96-322 

Washington, DC 20590 

Tel +^,687974378 

Fax +/,6 8 85 88 lo 

Mobile +46 70 997 43 78 

e-mail: ola.5undh@sas.5q-..^ 

„."> 

'.rj 

— f 

.-0 

T3 

rs> 

30 Ma y 2010 ( ^ 

fSJ 

rf^^ ^ 

mESrn 

§^5 

559 

CO 

5AS Request of waiver from US Part 382 

By 5 September 2008 SAS filed a waiver request from US Part 382 with U.S. Department of 

Transportation requesting a waiver from the following provisions: 

1) 

2) 

3) 

4) 

5) 

Part 382.17 

Part 382.29(a) 

Part 382.81 

Part 382.83 

Part 382.85 

In the mean time there have been some changes in SAS' seating restrictions which mean that we 

no longer see any conflict between the OMA and Part 382.81, Part 382.83 and Part 382.85. 

Therefore we hereby withdraw our waiver request regarding these provisions. For your 

information we enclose a copy of the revised OMA. 

SAS' waiver request regarding Part 382.17 and Part 382.29(a) is upheld and unchanged. 

Yours sincerely 

Scandinavian Airlines System 

Denmark - Norway - Sweden 

Customer Relations 

Ola Sundh 

Coordinator Passenger Rights 

Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark Norway Sweden 

SE-19S 87 Stockholm, Sweden, Telephone: +46 8 797 00 00 

A STAR ALLIANCE MEMBER >f^^ '
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics — Models, Parameters, and Uncertainty Treatment Used in FAVOR Version 04.1 (NUREG-1807)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1807 (PDF - 42.2 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed** May 2006 **Date Published:** June 2007 

**Prepared by:** M. EricksonKirk, B.R. Bass, T. Dickson, C. Pugh, T. Santos, P. Williams

Division of Fuel, Engineering and Radiological Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

During plant operation, the walls of reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) are exposed to neutron radiation, resulting in localized embrittlement of the vessel steel and weld materials in the core area. If an embrittled RPV had an existing flaw of critical size and certain severe system transients were to occur, the flaw could very rapidly propagate through the vessel, resulting in a through-wall crack and challenging the integrity of the RPV. The severe transients of concern, known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS), are characterized by a rapid cooling (i.e., thermal shock) of the internal RPV surface in combination with repressurization of the RPV. Advancements in our understanding and knowledge of materials behavior, our ability to realistically model plant systems and operational characteristics, and our ability to better evaluate PTS transients to estimate loads on vessel walls led the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to realize that the earlier analysis, conducted in the course of developing the PTS Rule in the 1980s, contained significant conservatisms.

This report, which describes the technical basis for the probabilistic fracture mechanics model, is one of a series of 21 other documents detailing the results of the NRC study.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

#  Fleet Commanders Meet Virtually on USS Blue Ridge

U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Criticality Analysis of Assembly Misload in a PWR Burnup Credit Cask (NUREG/CR-6955)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6955, (PDF - 7.85 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2004**Date Published:**January 2008

**Prepared by:** J.C. Wagner

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Batelle, LLC P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

D. Barto, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code B0009

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Interim Staff Guidance on burnup credit (ISG-8) for spent fuel in storage and transportation casks, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Spent Fuel Project Office, recommends a burnup measurement for each assembly to confirm the reactor record and compliance with the assembly burnup value used for loading acceptance. This recommendation is intended to prevent unauthorized loading (misloading) of assemblies due to inaccuracies in reactor burnup records and/or improper assembly identification, thereby ensuring that the appropriate subcritical margin is maintained. This report presents a computational criticality safety analysis of the consequences of misloading fuel assemblies in a high-capacity cask that relies on burnup credit for criticality safety. The purpose of this report is to provide a quantitative understanding of the effects of fuel misloading events on safety margins. A wide variety of fuel-misloading configurations are investigated and results are provided for informational purposes. This report does not address the likelihood of occurrence for any of the misload configurations considered. For representative, qualified burnup-enrichment combinations, with and without fission products included, misloading two assemblies that are underburned by 75% results in an increase in keff of 0.025−0.045, while misloading four assemblies that are underburned by 50% also results in an increase in keff of 0.025−0.045. For the cask and conditions considered, a reduction in burnup of 20% in all assemblies results in an increase in keff of less than 0.035. Misloading a single fresh assembly with 3, 4, or 5 wt% 235U enrichment results in an increase in keff of ~0.02, 0.04, or 0.06, respectively. The report concludes with a summary of these and other important findings, as well as a discussion of relevant issues that should be considered when assessing the appropriate role of burnup measurements.

 Generic Communication Containing No Information Collections: This Generic Letter (Bulletin, RIS, etc.) does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS 1997
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                       702
<INVENTORY>                                     24,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,572
<PP&E>                                           1,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,954
<SALES>                                         52,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,881
<CGS>                                           38,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 12.1.

Certifications

I, In Beom Park, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Meridian
Co. Ltd. ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

By: /s/In Beom ParkName: In Beom Park
Title: President, CEO, Director 
  Date: August 19, 2011

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# TRACE Assessment for Effect of Spacer Grid in RBHT Reflood Heat Transfer Experiments (NUREG/IA-0480)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0480 (PDF – 14.3 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2018**Date Published:** February 2018

**Prepared by:** Byung-Gil HUH, Ae-Ju CHEONG, Kyung Won LEE

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety Daejeon, Korea

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The effects of the spacer grid model in the TRACE V5.0 patch4 were evaluated for Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) reflood heat transfer experiments. The RBHT test section was modeled in the VESSEL and HTSTR components of TRACE. Two PIPE components were modeled as the lower plenum and upper plenum and the injected flow was provided by the FILL component that was connected to the bottom of the lower plenum. The BREAK component was used to set the pressure boundary at the top of the test section. The main parameters of the spacer grid were defined by the experimental data and seven mixing vane grids were modeled in the test section of TRACE. The calculations for six tests of RBHT confirmed that when the spacer grid model was used, the rod temperatures decreased and the rods were quenched at an earlier time. This was because the spacer grid enhanced the convective heat transfer due to the flow acceleration and turbulence increase. In Test 1096 at a low power, a low reflood rate, a low pressure and a low subcooling degree, the peak rod temperature and the quenching time were most significantly affected by the spacer grid. Sensitivity studies were also performed to identify 1) the effect of the number of nodes, 2) the effect of the spacer grid parameters and 3) the effect of the mixing vane. The effect of the spacer grid model in TRACE is largely shown to simulate the RBHT reflood heat transfer experiments. However, since the droplet breakup and the grid rewetting models were not yet fully implemented, there are some limitations to quantitatively predicting their effects and the TRACE code needs to be improved for these models in the future.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021