alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Inflation Reduction Act in Action: Funding Makes Georgia Farmer’s Dream Come True

Read the Story

### Featured News

USDA Makes $1.5 Billion Available to Help Farmers Advance Conservation and Climate-Smart Agriculture as Part of President Biden’s Investing in America Agenda

Equity
Advancing equity in our programs and services, and for those we serve.

Climate
Addressing climate change through NRCS' programs and services.

Urban
Working with farms in all locations, including those in urban areas.

Partners
Expanding the ability to get conservation on the ground.

Soil Health
Sequester carbon and increase productivity with soil health practices.

Soil Science
Providing the scientific foundation for soil conservation on the land.

Ranking Dates
Find your state-specific ranking dates for program applications.

Careers
NRCS is hiring nationwide in a variety of career fields.

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.  

## Trending News & Events

Success StoryNRCS Engineer of the Year Andy Deichert - Building Projects and Partnerships That LastFebruary 20, 2024

NewsUSDA Celebrates 10 Years of Climate Hubs as Biden-Harris Administration Leads Historic Climate Agenda February 05, 2024

Press ReleaseUSDA Invests Approximately $11.5 Million in Composting and Food Waste Reduction Projects in 23 StatesJanuary 25, 2024

    -  View More News 
    -  View More Events
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that to his knowledge, Vie
Financial Group, Inc.s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vie Financial Group, Inc.



| |  |                         |  |        |  |                        
| |  | ----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | Date: November 19, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Dean G. Stamos     
| |  |                         |  | Name:  |  | Dean G. Stamos.        
| |  |                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                         | 
| |  | Date: November 19, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Daniel A. Nole     
| |  |                         |  | Name:  |  | Daniel A. Nole         
| |  |                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Committees (NUREG/BR-0464 Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0464 Revision 2 (PDF - 15.7 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 2014

Dorothera Washington Office of Small Business and Civil Rights U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

The Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Committees provide advice and recommendations to the Office of Small Business and Civil Rights (SBCR) and National Treasury Employees Union, where appropriate. These recommendations concern policies, procedures, and practices related to selections, promotion, retention, placement, merit staffing training, recruitment, and career development of employees of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

EEO Advisory Committees conduct monthly meetings and organize seminars, workshops, and luncheons focused on career development and the needs of employees. The EEO Advisory Committees also host networking events to enhance awareness and employees' interpersonal relations with all levels of agency staff.

The EEO Advisory Committees participate in semiannual Executive Director of Operations briefings to the Commission to discuss the effectiveness of EEO and diversity management initiatives at the NRC.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2004161EN.01000901.xml

| 18.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/9

---

Notice of call for proposals

Action against antipersonnel landmines

EuropeAid/119924/C/G

(2004/C 161/05)

The European Commission is seeking proposals for supporting actions against antipersonnel landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mozambique, Somalia and Sudan with financial assistance from the antipersonnel landmines programme of the European Communities.

The full Guidelines for Applicants are available for consultation at the European Commission, EuropeAid/F6, Attn. Ms Pascale NOEL, office J-54 1/140, Rue de Genève 1-3-5, B-1140 Brussels BELGIUM and on the following internet site: http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl

The deadline for submission of proposals is Thursday 23/09/2004, at 16h00 (Brussels Time).

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1980

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: David Schied v. Michael Ray Merritt, Wynde Merritt, and 

Jeannette Smith

Appellate case number: 01-15-00466-CV

Trial court case number: 434,875

Trial court: Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County

The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on June 8, 2015. On June 4, 2015, the 

court reporter filed a motion to extend the time to file the reporter’s record. We granted 

the motion and extended the time to file the reporter’s record to July 8, 2015. Because the 

reporter’s record has not yet been filed, the appellate record is not complete and 

appellant’s brief is not yet due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1 (providing appellate record 

consists of clerk’s record and, if necessary to appeal, reporter’s record), 38.6(a) 

(providing appellant’s brief is due within 30 days after later of filing of clerk’s record or 

reporter’s record).

On June 15, 2015, appellant, David Schied, proceeding pro se, filed his appellant’s 

brief in this Court. Because the court’s reporter’s record has not been filed, if necessary 

and appropriate, appellant may file an amended appellant’s brief without leave of the 

Court no later than 30 days after the court reporter files the reporter’s record with this 

Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7 (providing for amendment of brief).

Appellee’s brief, if any, will be due no later than 30 days after the filing of 

appellant’s amended brief, if any.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually 

Date: June 23, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,603
<SECURITIES>                                       501
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                       149
<INVENTORY>                                      5,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,428
<PP&E>                                           4,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,624
<SALES>                                          4,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,251
<CGS>                                            1,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

WAYNE DAVVON BEATTY

PETITION OF: ERIC JACKSON LURIE, 

ESQ.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 155 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2019, in consideration of the Application for 

Leave to Withdraw, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Westmoreland County for a determination of whether Wayne Beatty’s present counsel 

should be permitted to withdraw. 

If present counsel is allowed to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any 

issues relative to Wayne Beatty being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro 

se. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is DIRECTED to enter its 

order regarding this remand within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its 

determination.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 7, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00438

- CR

Lester Hildago AGUILAR

, Appell ant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10697CR

Honorable Roland Andrade , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due by September 6, 2022, and on that day, the court reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension until October 10, 2022 to file

the record. Under Rule 35.3, this court is responsible for ensuring the appellate record is timely filed, and any extension we grant “must not exceed 30 days in an ordinary or restricted appeal.”

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly, we grant in part the court reporter’s request for an
extension, and we order the court reporter to file the record by Octobe r 6, 2022

. If by that date, the court reporter needs an additional extension, she is advised she must file a second request for

an extension.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of September, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PRO TECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2007-1035 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementati on Plans; State of Colorado; Interstate Transport of Pollution Revisions for the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS: “Interference with Maintenance” Requirement DATE : September 9, 2010 SUBJECT: EPA's Guidance and Supporting Docume ntation - Proposed Rulemaking Federal Register : "Approval and Promulgation of Stat e Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; Interstate Trans port of Pollution Revisions for the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS: “Interference with Maintenance” Requirement FROM: Domenico Mastrangelo, Environmental Engineer Office of Partnership and Regulatory Assistance Air and Radiation Program (8P-AR) TO: Docket Number EPA-R08-OAR-2007-1035

CONTENTS GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 1. EPA – August 15, 2006: "Guidance for Stat e Implementation Plan (SIP) Submissions to Meet Current Outstanding Obligations Under Section 110(a)(2)(D)( i) for the 8-Hour Ozone and
PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards;" signed by William Ha rnett, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
1. EPA TSD. APPENDIX A: Texas and Califor nia Maintenance-Only Monitors; Back Trajectories for 2005-2006 Exceedance Days for the 1997 Ozone NAAQS.
2. “Dallas-Fort Worth Eight-Hour Ozone Nona ttainment Area: Attainment Demonstration, Appendix G, DFW Nonattainment Area Ozone Conceptual Model,” TCEQ, May 23, 2007.2 3. “New Mexico State Interstate Transport SI P Submitted to EPA July 30, 2007: Appendix D, Exhibit 9 Modeling Data and Report for New Mexico.”
4. “Effects of Meteorology on Pollutant Trends,” Dave Sullivan, March 16, 2009,
5. “ 

### Documentation of Future Year Ozone and Annual PM2.5 Design Va lues for Monitors in Western States,” EPA, August 23, 2010.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00616

- CV
Carrie BUNDE , Appellant

v. Cory BUNDE , Appellee
From the 407th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 19474 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca S immons , Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 7, 2012
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant’s brie f was due to be filed by January 9, 2012. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time have been filed. On January 26, 2012 this court ordered appellant to file appellant’s brief no later than February 8, 2012 . Our order informed appellant that if she failed to file the brief by this date, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.8(a). Appellant has not responded; therefore, this appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.3 (b)

. PER CURIAM
# C_2004228EN.01000201.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-349/01: Betriebsrat der Firma ADS Anker GmbH v ADS Anker GmbH (1)

1

(Social policy - Articles 4 and 11 of Directive 94/45/CE - European Works Council - Information and consultation of workers in Community-scale undertakings - Obligation for central management to provide certain information to employees' representatives)

(2004/C 228/03)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-349/01: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Arbeitsgericht (Labour Court) Bielefeld (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Betriebsrat der Firma ADS Anker GmbH and ADS Anker GmbH on the interpretation of Articles 4 and 11 of Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (OJ 1994 L 254, p. 64) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, F. Macken (Rapporteur) and N. Colneric, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 4(1) and Article 11 of Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees must be interpreted as meaning that Member States are required to impose on undertakings established within their territory and constituting the central management of a Community-scale group of undertakings for the purposes of Article 2(1)(e) and Article 3(1) of the Directive, or the deemed central management under the second subparagraph of Article 4(2), the obligation to supply to another undertaking in the same group established in another Member State the information requested from it by its employees' representatives, where that information is not in the possession of that other undertaking and it is essential for opening negotiations for the setting up of a European Works Council.

---

(1)  OJ C 369 of 22.12.2001.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 1.2**

 

[LOGO]

 
| DEAN HELLER                                                     | **Certificate of Amendment**        | Office Use  Only: | FILED # C 14531-00              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------|
| Secretary of  State                                             | (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and 78.390) |              | OCT 21 2002                     |
| 202 North  Carson Street,                                       |                                |              | IN THE OFFICE OF                |
| Carson City,  Nevada 89701-4201                                 |                                |              | /s/ Dean Heller                 |
| (775) 684  5708                                                 |                                |              | DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE |
|                                                            |                                |              |                            |
| *Important: Read attached instructions  before completing form* |                                |

 

 

**Certificate of Amendment to Article e of h**

**For Nevada Profit Corporations**

**(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - AfterIssuance of Stock)**

**- Remit In Duplicate -**

 

1.  Name of corporation:SUPERIOR NETWORKS INC.

 

2.  The articles have beenamended as follows (provide article numbers, If available):

The name of the Corporation is hereby changed to L. Air Holding Inc.

 

3.  The vote by which thestockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise atleast a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the votingpower as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as maybe required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted infavor of the amendment is: simple majority.*

 

4.  Officer Signature(Required):

 
| /s/ Alex Goldman        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Alex Goldman, President |

 

----

* If any Proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or anyrelative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares,then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmativevote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority ofthe voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardlessof limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

 

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remitthe proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

 

Nevada Secretary of State Form 74.385 PROFITAMENDMENT 1999-01

Revised 011: 07/21/01

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THOE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of Impax Laboratories, Inc. does hereby certify that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.






/s/ Barry R. Edwards         Chief Executive OfficerDate:     November 15, 2004
---------------------------
    Barry R. Edwards



/s/ Cornel C. Spiegler       Chief Financial OfficerDate:     November 15, 2004
---------------------------
    Cornel C. Spiegler



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
U.S. Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.










                                       30