alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


Form 10-K


Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.


File No. 000-53404








CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I Peter H. Nielsen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 30, 2010
/s/  Peter H. NielsenPeter H. NielsenChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT15**

 

 

 

The Partners

Duke Realty Limited Partnership

 

 

 

 

Gentlemen:

 

RE:  Registration Statement No.333-108557-01

 

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge ourawareness of the use therein of our report dated November 9, 2004 related toour review of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such reportis not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified byan accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within themeaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

 

 

 

KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

November 11, 2004

 

----
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.





In connection with the Annual Report of Vision Global Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd Waltz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  June 10, 2010

/s/ Todd WaltzTodd Waltz, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Commission Papers

### Filter by Document Type

 All 

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Commission Papers

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
#### Robert Lee MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 8034.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 7, 1965.

*326Charles L. Saunders, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lewis 0. Campbell, Asst. U. S. Atty. (John Quinn, U. S. Atty., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico found appellant Martinez guilty of four counts charging narcotic offenses, and the court sentenced him to 6-year concurrent terms. He did not appeal. While a prisoner at La Tuna, Texas, he filed a habeas corpus petition in the sentencing court which treated it as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and denied it without a hearing. Reversal is sought on the ground that a hearing should have been held.

The record and the order of the trial court show that the appellant was arrested on a warrant, was brought before a United States commissioner, was tried by a jury, did not testify in his own behalf, and was represented by retained counsel both before the commissioner and in the jury trial. No showing is made of the use at the trial of any illegally seized evidence or of any incriminating statements of the accused after arrest.

The papers filed by the appellant in the trial court defy intelligent analysis. Various legal principles are asserted without attempt to relate them to the facts of the case. An application for post-conviction relief, whether it be under § 2255 or by way of habeas corpus, which states bald conclusions unsupported by allegation of fact is legally insufficient and may be denied without a hearing.1

In this court appointed counsel urges that the trial court should have appointed counsel for appellant and required that he be furnished with a trial transcript. A federal prisoner is entitled to no such exploratory aids on the basis of the showing made here. In a collateral attack on a judgment in a criminal case, the prisoner must allege some factual ba*327sis for the relief sought. This appellant has not done so. If a legally sufficient motion is subsequently filed, it should not be considered repetitious.

Affirmed.

1

. Stephens v. United States, 10 Cir., 246 F.2d 607. See also Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 19, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.
HomeNuclear SecurityDomestic SafeguardsPhysical Protection

# Intrusion Alarm Assessment

Intrusion detection systems can incorrectly alarm because of environmental or other factors; therefore, the licensee must assess whether an alarm is genuine or not. The assessment also provides information to the security force about the number, location, and weapons of the intruders.

Intrusion Alarm Assessment can be performed in a number of ways, including use of:
        - Closed circuit televison (CCTV) cameras to observe the zone of the alarm	           - CCTV performance can be enhanced by use of video capture systems to allow instant play-back of the scene at the time the alarm was tripped 
        - Security officers in guard towers
        - Security officers proceeding to the alarm zone

Intrusion Alarm Assessment performance should be adequate to correctly identify actual intrusions despite adversary use of such techniques as:
        - speed of individuals through the isolation zone
        - camouflage of persons in the isolation zone
        - shadows or other lighting conditions in the isolation zone
        - alarm stacking, that is, causing a large number of alarms over a short period of time
        - normal environmental factors affecting visibility

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Armed Response
          - Threat Assessment
          - Intrusion Alarm Assessment
          - Intrusion Detection
          - Physical Protection Areas
          - Regulatory Initiatives

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 11, 2020
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Acceptance Criteria for the Evaluation of Category I Fuel Cycle Facility Physical Security Plans (NUREG-1322)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1322 (PDF – 8.03 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 1991**Date Published:** October 1991

P.A. Dwyer

Division of Safeguards and TransportationOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This NUREG document presents criteria developed from U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission regulations for the evaluation of physical security plans submittedby Category I fuel facility licensees. Category I refers to those licensees whouse or possess a formula quantity of strategic special nuclear material.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, January 11, 2024
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 5 - 19 35 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - SW - 0 08 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### Helene Gandy **Date**

**B ranch Manager**  **Date**
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of
Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                              
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
    and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERG                              
| |                                                      
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

Date: June 28, 2004

1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Michael I. Dobrovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of MedVest Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, (the “Periodic Report”), containing the financial statements of MedVest Holdings Corporation, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

 

(2)      the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MedVest Holdings Corporation.

 

Dated: April 6, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael I. Dobrovic                     |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Michael I.  Dobrovic                        |   |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
FILED

February 29, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

OWNER-OPERATOR )

INDEPENDENT DRIVERS )

ASSOCIATION, INC., HAROLD )

LANDRY, JIMMY HUX d/b/a )

HUX TRUCKING, RICHARD )

KERSHMAN, and LAUREL )

BARRICK, Individually and On )

Behalf of All Others Similarly )

Situated, )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Appeal No.

) M1999-02560-COA-R3-CV

VS. )

) Williamson Chancery

CONCORD EFS, INC., EFS ) No. 125387

NATIONAL BANK, FLYING J, )

INC., and PILOT CORPORATION, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the petitions for rehearing submitted by

defendants/appellees Flying J, Inc., and Pilot Corporation, the petitions are

hereby granted, the opinion filed in this case is withdrawn, and the attached

opinion is substituted therefor.

______________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL,

PRESIDING JUDGE, M.S. 

______________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE 

_______________________________

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Technology Transfer; Notice of meetings

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Intramural Research 
(OIR), National Institutes of Health (NIH), will host two webinars to 
enable public discussion of its proposal to reorganize the OIR Office 
of Technology Transfer (OTT). The proposal seeks to align authority and 
responsibility for the implementation and execution of patenting and 
licensing (P&L) functions within the NIH Institutes and Centers.

DATES: The first webinar will be held on February 13th from 9:30 to 
10:00 a.m. The second webinar will be held on February 13th from 10:00 
to 10:30 a.m. Members of the public wishing to join a webinar must 
register via the webinar link provided. Any interested person may also 
file written comments by sending an email to Deborah Kassilke, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e050f1d1d0702050b0a2e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d262c3e3e24212628290d202c242163232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a> by Tuesday, February 17th, 2015. The written 
comment should include the commenter's name and, when applicable, 
professional affiliation.

ADDRESSES: Session 1: February 13, 2015 from 9:30 to 10:00 a.m. https://nih.webex.com/nih/j.php?MTID=m2a6eb40ebe096afad861f0b5e941f9bc.
    Session 2: February 13, 2015 from 10:00 to 10:30 a.m. https://nih.webex.com/nih/j.php?MTID=m8c50a9e8b5454a39b4fa24d9df412fab.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Kassilke, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a616b79796366616f6e4a676b636624646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69d9785859f9a9d9392b69b979f9ad8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>, 301-435-2950.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The background of the proposed OTT 
reorganization is as follows.
    The Advisory Committee to the NIH Deputy Director for Intramural 
Research, and the Technology Transfer Steering Committee (TTSC) 
recently assessed OTT to determine how it services the overall 
technology transfer needs of the NIH. The committees recommended that 
the authority and responsibility for the implementation and execution 
of patenting and licensing should be decentralized from OTT and 
distributed throughout the NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs). In 
September 2014, the NIH Steering Committee accepted this 
recommendation.

    Dated: January 27, 2015.
Lawrence Tabak,
Principal Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2015-01964 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2035 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2035

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

 Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Kind, and 
 Ms. Jayapal) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Adoption Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING UNDER THE ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 23(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining child with special needs) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after ``a State''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after ``such State''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

PAINCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PainCare
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randy Lubinsky, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark
Szporka, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Randy Lubinsky                     
|Randy Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 28, 2007                  
|                                       
|/s/ Mark Szporka                       
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial and      
|Accounting Officer                     
|Date: August 28, 2007