alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke RealtyLimited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Cohoat, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/ Matthew A. Cohoat        |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Matthew A. Cohoat            |
|   | Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|   | of the General  Partner      |
|   | Date: November 5, 2007       |

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Duke RealtyLimited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnershipand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of  Electronic  Media
Central  Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June 28, 2005
                                                          /s/ George Morris
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George Morris
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

The Partners

Duke Realty Limited Partnership

 

 

Gentlemen:

 

RE:  Registration Statements Nos. 333-108557-01

 

With respect to the subjectregistration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of ourreport dated August 9, 2004 related to our review of interim financialinformation.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, such report is not considered a part of aregistration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of sections 7 and 11of the Act.

 

 

KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

August 9, 2004

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

April 12,
2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
are filing our Form 10-K with financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"). Andersen's audit opinion on our December 31, 2001 financial statements is dated
April 12, 2002. In accordance with Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X we have received certain required representations from Andersen in a letter signed by
them and dated April 12, 2002.

Andersen
has represented to us that the audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards. They further represented that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office
consultation. Andersen represented that there was availability of national office consultation and personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of this audit.

Sincerely,

/s/
Frederick G. Westerman III

Chief
Financial Officer
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc.

---
No. 91-548.

#### Choate *v.*Farm Credit Bank of Wichita.

Ct. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 90-5535.

#### Christoph *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001003390
<NAME>                        FIRST SOUTH AFRICA CORP., LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          5,292,754
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   7,635,131
<ALLOWANCES>                      397,882
<INVENTORY>                     3,780,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               17,896,602
<PP&E>                         10,477,089
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,252,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 32,063,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          12,675,642
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           41,748
<OTHER-SE>                     19,558,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   32,063,445
<SALES>                        11,690,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               11,690,884
<CGS>                           6,213,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  10,468,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                215,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,207,706
<INCOME-TAX>                      378,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               829,135
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      829,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .18
        


</TABLE>
#### Putney and another, Respondents, vs. School District No. 4 of the Town of Brookfield and others, Appellants.

*May 9*

June *5, 1934.*

For the appellants there'was a brief by *Salen & Brenner*of Waukesha, and oral argument by *Herman R. Salen.*

*Charles J. Weaver*of Milwaukee, for the respondents.

*540Rosenbeery, C. J.

From the findings of fact which are sustained by the evidence, it appears that the defendant district used the premises as a location for its district school down to about 1930. In that year it purchased .a tract of land, three acres in extent, about one-quarter of a mile distant from the lands described in the complaint, and built thereon a new school building of a size and kind adequate for the needs of the district; that it took possession of the new building on January 1, 1931, removing from the old school building all of the school paraphernalia, furniture, and equipment with the exception of a few small articles of inconsequential value.

The court further found that by the purchase of the new site, the erection of an adequate school building thereon, and the removal from the old site to the new, the defendant district abandoned the premises involved.

It is strenuously argued here that under the doctrine of *Burrows v. Madison Park & P. D. Asso. 177*Wis. 639, 189 N. W. 535, the premises were not in fact abandoned. This argument is based upon the testimony of school officers to the effect that they did not intend to relinquish their interest in the property; that the building was being used for storage purposes, and that its use for playground purposes was contemplated; that the school district kept insurance upon the property.

The deed was quite apparently drawn by someone who had no knowledge of conveyancing. While the language employed is not technical, if it does not mean that when the grantee ceased to use the premises for school purposes, it should revert to the grantee or his heirs, it means nothing. It is the use to which the property is put, not the intention of the school officers, which governs. If it were construed as defendants claim it should be, that is, that the property should be owned by the district as long as the district wanted it, the grant would be unconditional.

*541The question involved is clearly one of fact. The findings of the trial court being sustained by the evidence, the abandonment by the defendant worked a forfeiture of the estate of the defendant, and the court correctly awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
JohnD. Ferry, Jr. 

4459 Hickorywood Dr. 

Okemos, Ml 48864 

1.517.285.5322 TEL 

1.517.913.5947 FAX 

iohn.d.ferrv@comcast.net 

February 7, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

"'U?Sr'DeptT^f Transportation ' " ~ " 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

r n 

on 

- d 

Re: Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

I request that you give favorable consideration to maintaining a direct flight from Lansing Capital Airport 

to Washington DC - Reagan Airport for Sun Country Airline. 

It is an important for the vitality of the Lansing area business community, and for the socia\ well-being of 

the Lansing community, to have ready access to travel to the nation's capital. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

John D. Ferry, Jr
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1987

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
No. 82-6061.

No. 82-6072.

No. 82-6073.

#### Barros *v.*United States; Perez-Munoz *v.*United States; and Rivas-Iglesias *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 681 F. 2d 1372 and 692 F. 2d 116.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HelpMate Robotics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy A. Lubinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                       |   |               |                                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 20, 2002 |   |     | /s/ Randy A. Lubinsky                                                       |
|                       |   |               |    Randy A. Lubinsky, Chairman,Chief Executive Officer  |
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TERRY ALLEN JR., DC#C00076, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3714 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 16, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Terry Allen, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KELLY, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001003477
<NAME> AUTOLOGIC INFORMATION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-1999
<CASH>                                          10,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,564
<PP&E>                                           5,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,285
<SALES>                                         18,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,796
<CGS>                                           11,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        30
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Corrosion Rate Measurements and Chemical Speciation of Corrosion Products Using Thermodynamic Modeling of Debris Components to Support GSI-191 (NUREG/CR-6873)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6873 (PDF - 23.48 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2005**Date Published:**April 2005

**Prepared by:** V. Jain, X. He, Y.-M. Pan Southwest Research Institute Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, Texas 78228-0510

B.P. Jain, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code N6061

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents thermodynamic simulations conducted to determine whether post loss-of-coolant-accident (LOCA) debris generation and consequent sump screen head loss in a pressurized water reactor containment can be affected by chemical interactions between the emergency core cooling system/containment spray water and exposed materials. Based on the measured corrosion rates, estimated exposed surface area, and exposure time, the thermodynamics simulations indicated that the formation of dominant solid phases was controlled by the presence of Nukon® low-density fiber insulation, aluminum, and concrete. The predicted dominant solid phases consisted of potentially amorphous silicate phases such as sodium aluminum silicate (NaAlSi3O8), calcium magnesium silicate [Ca2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2], calcium silicate (CaSiO3), and silica (SiO2). The results were based on the solid phases included in the thermodynamic simulation program database. The formation of actual solid phases may be different depending on the reaction kinetics. Although some constituents decreased proportionally with increasing time, the solid NaAlSi3O8 phase continued to be a dominant solid phase at all times. The formation of NaAlSi3O8 in the presence of alkaline solutions could lead to gel formation, which could result in clogging of containment area sump pump suction strainers. Thermodynamic simulations indicate that in alkaline simulated containment water at pH 10 there is no significant difference in corrosion product formation as high-temperature and pressure conditions during the initial stages of a LOCA event approach steady-state atmospheric pressure conditions. This report provides insight to and is useful in understanding the evolution of solution chemistry and the formation of solid phases in integrated chemical effects tests at the University of New Mexico.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Exhibit 99.2
                                 ------------

                                       13
<PAGE>

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S
               -------------------------------------------------
           ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
           --------------------------------------------------------
            SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
            -------------------------------------------------------
                               MORTGAGE BANKERS
                               ----------------



Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) ("the Company") compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of
and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying
management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CHL) complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 7, 2002


                                       14
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.46



Tim Thurn
---------

                                                           Meeting March 7, 1996

                               Contract Addendum

April 1st         $100k base salary - 1 Yr No Cut Contract
                        except for well documented material cause

Feb 9th           50,000/8 yrs at $5.25 stock price or better.
                  If terminated by LM after change of control, change of
                  CEO or without well documented material cause (equivalent
                  to fraud), all outstanding options granted shall vest
                  immediately and Tim shall have 1 year from the
                  termination date in which to exercise.
            This accelerated vesting does not apply if employee
            resigns voluntarily.

                                       /s/ Mel Masters
                                       CEO

Feb 9th, 1996
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# SCALE Ver 4.4: A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (NUREG/CR-0200)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021