MEMORANDUM TO: William D. Travers

Executive Director for Operations

FROM: John A. Zwolinski, Director

Division of Licensing Project Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT: FEBRUARY 1999 REPORT ON THE STATUS OF PUBLIC PETITIONS UNDER

10 CFR 2.206

The attached monthly report gives the status of 10 CFR 2.206 petitions as of February 28,1999. During

February, Director’s Decisions (DD-99-01) on Haddam Neck (G980568), Director’s Decision (DD-99-02)

on Atlas Corporation (G19980547), Director’s Decision (DD-99-03) on D.C. Cook (GT97724) and

Director’s Decision (DD-99-04) on Vermont Yankee (G980233) became final agency actions and were

closed. Thus there are 4 active NRR and 3 active NMSS petitions.

Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4 provide the status of petitions for the Offices of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards and Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Attachment 1 lists petitions with status change from the

previous update including new additions to the list of petitions, Attachment 2 lists petitions with no status

change from the previous update, and Attachment 3 gives the status of petitions that are in a confidential

status and for internal distribution only. Attachment 4 lists the Director’s Decisions/Petitions that have been

closed during the current year.

Attachment 5 shows the age and staff hours expended on open 2.206 petitions as of February 28, 1999. This

table reflects input from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards (NMSS), and the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Attachment 6 provides a summary of the

status of 2.206 petitions exceeding the 120-day scheduled completion goal. Attachment 7 shows the statistics

for the 2.206 petitions processed during 1999.

Those parts of the monthly report not of a sensitive nature and recently issued Director’s Decisions are placed

in the Public Document Room and on the NRC’s external home page, making them readily accessible to the

public. The URL address is http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/2206/index.html.

Attachments: As stated

cc w/atts: F. Miraglia, DEDR/OEDO P. Lohaus, OSP E. Julian, SECY

M. Knapp, DEDO/OEDO J. Lieberman, OE G. Caputo, OI

P. Norry, DEDM/OEDO J. Cordes, Jr., OCAA OCA

J. Blaha, AO/EDO J. Goldberg, OGC OPA

K. Cyr, OGC L. Chandler, OGC P. Goldberg, NMSS

S. Collins, NRR C. Paperiello, NMSS S. Moore, NMSS

Regional Administrators

CONTACT: Ram Subbaratnam, NRR

 415-1478
Report on Status of Public Petitions

Under 10 CFR 2.206 with Status Change from Previous Update

February 28, 1999

(Table of Contents)

Attachment 1

 Page

 Facility Petitioner/EDO No. No.

Diablo Canyon, Units 1 & 2 UCS/G19980707.........................................2

Atlas Corporation Dagget, et al.(G19990011)..........................3

Browns Ferry 1 Lochbaum/G980199.................................4

Envirocare of Utah, Inc. Natural Resources Defense Council...........5

Army Corps of Engineers NRDC/G19980622/T.Cochran...............6

River Bend Union of Concerned Scientists(UCS)/

G980592...........................................7

Perry Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Union of Concerned

Scientists(UCS)/G19980678................8
2

Attachment 1

Report on 

Status of Public Petitions

Under 10CFR 2.206 with Status Change from Previous Update

Facility: Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2

Petitioner: D. Lochbaum

Date of Petition: 11/24/98

Director’s Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 11/30/98

EDO Number: G19980707

OGC Number: P-98-017

Scheduled Completion Date: 4/30/99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 12/23/98

Petition Manager: S. Bloom

Case Attorney: S. Chidakel

Issues/Action Requested: 

The petition requests that the operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 be modified to

require that the plant’s owners have an independent contractor evaluate the facility’s safety

culture. Additionally, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) requested an informal hearing

be held near Diablo Canyon to examine the concerns raised by the petition.

As the basis for the request, the petition states that the recent revoking of the security access

authorization for an operator at the plant may have a “chilling effect” with others at the plant and

could lead to obvious negative safety implications. The petitioner is concerned about the clear

indications that the safety culture at Diablo Canyon is not conducive to employee’s raising

safety concerns without fear of retaliation.

Background: 

A Petition Review Board meeting was held on 12/7/98. The acknowledgment letter and Federal

Register notice were issued on December 30, 1998. A public meeting was held as scheduled

on January 15, 1999, with PG&E and its contractor to discuss the results of its safety-conscious

survey with NRC. This was followed by a public comment period. Synergy presented both

positive and negative findings and PG&E stated that it would be following up on the

recommendations from the report to correct the negative comments from the survey.

Current Status: 

The Director's Decision (DD-99-05) on the petition was issued on March 12, 1999. The

decision will become a final agency action after the Commission’s 25-day review period.

Facility: ATLAS CORPORATION

Petitioner: Earth Justice Legal Defense Fund

Date of Petition: 1/11/99
3

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NMSS

Date Referred to Review Organization: 1/12/98

EDO Number: G19990011

OGC Number: P-99-02

Scheduled Completion Date: 5-26-99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 2-10-99

Petition Manager: Myron Fliegel

Case Attorney: J. McGurren

Issues/Action Requested:

Petitioners request NRC to take six immediate actions to halt impacts to and to ensure the

conservation of the endangered species of fish in the Colorado River near the Atlas site.

Background:

On August 2, 1988, Atlas submitted an application for a license amendment to revise its site reclamation plan fo

uranium mill tailings at its no longer operating site near Moab, Utah. On March 30, 1994, notice of intent to pre

an Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register. In January 1996, the Draft

Environmental Impact Statement was published for public comment. On July 29, 1998, the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act

(ESA), issued a final biological opinion for impacts to Federally listed endangered species from

the reclamation of the Atlas mill tailings site. On October 12, 1998, and November 13, 1998,

petitioners notified NRC of their intent to sue under the ESA. On December 16, 1998,

petitioners filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction against NRC in the U.S. District Court,

District of Utah. A Petition Review Board meeting was held on January 26, 1999, and the

petitioner’s requests for immediate action were denied by a letter of that date. In the letter, it

was noted that none of the six items identified in the petition addresses a health, safety, or

environmental concern that requires emergency steps before a complete review as

provided for in 10 CFR 2.206. 

Current Status: 

An acknowledgment letter was published in the Federal Register on February 12, 1999,

with a pre-publication copy sent to the petitioner on February 10, 1999.
4

Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 1

Petitioner: D.Lochbaum

Date of Petition: 4/5/98

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 4/6/98

EDO Number: G980199

OGC Number: P-98-007 

Scheduled Completion Date: 3/9/99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 10/26/98

Petition Manager: A. DeAgazio

Case Attorney: R. Hoefling

Issues/Action Requested:

The petitioner asked for an informal hearing requesting that (1) the operating license for Browns Ferry, Unit 1, b

revoked and (2) the NRC should require the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to submit either a decommission

plan or lay-up plan for Browns Ferry, Unit 1. As the basis for the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) request

petitioner asserts that because Browns Ferry, Unit 1, has been on “administrative hold@ since June 1, 1985, and

not been operating since then, revocation of the operating license and requiring relicensing, if TVA later decide

restart Unit 1, is a better, safer process than is the current Inspection Manual Chapter 0350 restart process. F

the petitioner asserts that requiring a decommissioning plan would provide assurance that the irradiated fuel is 

safely and that Units 2 and 3 are sufficiently independent of Unit 1 for safe operation. 

Background:

This petition was received on April 5, 1998. The 2.206 Petition Review Board convened in mid-April 1998, and

endorsed a proposed course of action. The acknowledgment letter was issued April 29, 1998, with a decision n

hold an informal hearing on the UCS petition. The petitioner sent in another letter dated June 5, 1998, requesti

the staff reconsider conducting a public hearing. The staff has determined that while the 2.206 petition alone d

not meet the criteria contained in Management Directive 8.11 regarding a hearing, the staff has chosen to cond

informal hearing near the Browns Ferry site to afford the petitioner, licensee, and members of the public an

opportunity to provide relevant information to the staff. A Federal Register notice (63 FR 51626) to hold an info

hearing in the Browns Ferry area was issued on September 28, 1998. An informal hearing was held in the Brow

Ferry area on October 26, 1998. The information presented at the hearing by the petitioner and the licensee ha

been reviewed and will be used as appropriate to arrive at the Director’s Decision. 

Current Status:

Director’s Decision has been completed and is currently in concurrence.
5

Facility: Envirocare of Utah, Inc.

Petitioner: Natural Resources Defense Council

Date of Petition: 12/30/98

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NMSS/DWM

Date Referred to Review Organization: 12/30/98

EDO Number: G19980767

OGC Number: P-99-01

Scheduled Completion Date: 6-2-99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 01/26/99

Petition Manager: Harold Lefevre

Case Attorney: J. McGurren

Issues/Action Requested:

The petitioner requests that the NRC issue an order to show cause why Khosrow B. Semnani, former President

Envirocare, should not be prohibited from participating in any NRC-licensed activity.

Background:

The petitioner correctly points out that in the February 7, 1997, denial of the Natural Resources

Defense Council’s (NRDC’s) petition of January 8, 1997, requesting revocation of all of Envirocare’s

licenses, NRC indicated that no immediate action was required to protect public health and safety. 

NRC further recognized, and so stated in the February 7, 1997, Director’s Decision, that the on-going

(at that time) criminal investigation centering on Mr. Semnani’s alleged bribery of Mr. Larry Anderson

(former Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control) may raise potential issues of integrity,

which, if proven, may raise questions as to whether the NRC should have the requisite reasonable

assurance that Envirocare will comply with Commission requirements.

The Department of Justice’s (Justice’s) criminal investigation of Mr. Semnani resulted in his conviction

on a single charge of misdemeanor tax fraud. Mr. Semnani has not been convicted of bribery. 

According to documents recently received by NRC, Mr. Semnani’s agreement with Justice indicates

that he was extorted by Mr. Anderson. Mr. Anderson has not been convicted of extortion. To the best

of the staff’s knowledge, no Justice charges have been filed against Mr. Anderson. Additionally, a

civil trial to determine whether Mr. Anderson is legally entitled to monies allegedly owned him by Mr.

Semnani has yet to be held.

Mr. Semnani entered into an agreement with the Department of Energy (DOE) in 1997 wherein he, in

light of possible economic sanctions against Envirocare, agreed to debar himself as president of

Envirocare. This DOE/Mr. Semnani agreement remains in effect although it is the staff’s

understanding (through newspaper accounts) that Mr. Semnani has recently approached the DOE

requesting that his debarment be lifted. The PRB meeting was held on January 20, 1999.

Current Status:

An acknowledgment letter was issued on Feb. 2, 1999. NRC’s responses to letters received from Mr. Semnan

(Jan.12, 1999) and NRDC’s Mr. Cochran (Jan.19, 1999) are expected to be issued by mid-March, 1999. 
6

Facility: Multiple Sites under the United States Formerly

Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program

(FUSRAP)

Petitioner: Thomas Cochran, Natural Resources Defense

Council James Sottile, IV, Caplin & Drysdale

Christian R. Pastore, Caplin & Drysdale

Date of Petition: 10/15/98

Director’s Decision To Be Issued by: OGC

Date Referred to Review Organization: 10/21/98

EDO Number: G19980622

OGC Number: P-98-015

Scheduled Completion Date: 2/15/99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 3/1/99

Petition Manager: J. Lusher

Case Attorney: H. Newsome

Issue/ Action Requested:

The petitioners have requested that NRC exert authority to ensure that the Corps of Engineers’

handling of radioactive materials in connection with the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action

Program (FUSRAP) is effected in accord with a properly issued license and all other applicable

requirements.

Background:

Until recently, FUSRAP was administered by the Department of Energy. In October of 1997,

Congress transferred funding for FUSRAP from DOE to the Corps of Engineers. NRDC

believes that the Corps should obtain an NRC license to conduct activities under FUSRAP. At

this time, NRC has not required the Corps to obtain a license. Office of the General Counsel

(OGC) is currently reviewing NRDC’s request. An acknowledgment letter was issued on November 30,

1998.

Current Status:

The petitioner was sent copies of the DOE and Corps responses to the petition on

February 17, 1999. Additionally, OGC completed the draft Director’s Decision denying the

Petition. The letters transmitting the Director’s Decision to the petitioner and the FRN

have been completed and the Director’s Decision is with NMSS management for review

and approval.
7

Facility: River Bend Station

Petitioner: D. Lochbaum

Date of Petition: 9/25/98

Director’s Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 9/29/98

EDO Number: G980592

OGC Number: P-98-14

Scheduled Completion Date: 4/1/99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 2/22/99

Petition Manager: R. Fretz

Case Attorney: R. Hoefling

Issues/Action Requested:

The petition requested enforcement action to require an immediate shutdown of the River Bend Station (RBS) a

that the facility remain shut down until all failed fuel assemblies are removed from the reactor core. The RBS

licensee, Entergy Operations, Inc., had recently filed NRC Daily Event Report No. 34815, in which it reported Aa

possible defect in fuel cladding.@ As an alternate action, the petitioner also stated that RBS could be restarted

following the proposed shutdown after its design and licensing bases were updated to permit operation with fail

fuel assemblies. In addition, the petitioner requested a public hearing to present new plant-specific information

regarding the operation of RBS, as well as to discuss a UCS report dated April 2, 1998, entitled APotential Nucle

Safety Hazard/Reactor Operation With Failed Fuel Cladding.@ 

Background:

An acknowledgment letter was issued on 10/29/98. Since the petition did not provide specific information which

would lead the staff to conclude that an urgent safety problem existed, the petitioner’s request for the immediat

shutdown of RBS was denied. However, in the acknowledgment letter the NRC offered the petitioner an oppor

for an informal public hearing. On 11/6/98, the petitioner responded to the NRC’s acknowledgment letter, and

accepted the offer for an informal public hearing. The response for this petition is being coordinated

with a similar petition associated with Perry Nuclear plant. The NRC has written to the licensee, in a

letter dated 12/1/98, requesting their participation in the hearing and a formal response to the issues raised in t

9/25/98 Petition.

Current Status: 

An informal public hearing was held on February 22, 1999, as scheduled. This provided an opportunity for the

petitioner and the public to provide their inputs, which will be useful in the preparation of the Director’s Decision
8

Facility: Perry Nuclear Station, Unit 1

Petitioner: D. Lochbaum

Date of Petition: 11/9/98

Director’s Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 11/13/98

EDO Number: G19980678

OGC Number: P-98-16

Scheduled Completion Date: 4/11/99

Last Contact with Petitioner: 2/22/99

Petition Manager: D. Pickett

Case Attorney: R. Hoefling

Issues/Action Requested:

The Petition requested enforcement action to require an immediate shutdown of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant

(PNPP) and that the facility remain shut down until all failed fuel assemblies are removed from the reactor core

an alternate action, the petitioner asserted that PNPP could be restarted after its design and licensing bases w

updated to permit operation with failed fuel assemblies. Additionally, the petitioner requested an informal public

hearing to present new information on reactor operation with failed fuel assemblies as well as to discuss the Ap

1998 UCS report on reactor operation with failed fuel assemblies. As the basis for the request, the Petition stat

that operation with one or more failed fuel assemblies is not permitted by Perry’s design and licensing bases. M

specifically, UCS contends that Perry is also violating its worker radiation protection program (ALARA) licensing

basis.

Background:

A PRB meeting was held on November 23, 1998, to screen the petition. Since the petition did not provide spec

information which would lead the staff to conclude that an urgent safety problem existed, the petitioner’s reques

the immediate shutdown of PNPP was denied. However, in the acknowledgment letter, the NRC offered the

petitioner an opportunity for an informal public hearing that will be coordinated with a similar petition associated

River Bend Station. The acknowledgment letter and Federal Register notice denying the petitioner’s request fo

immediate shutdown were issued on December 16, 1998.

Current Status:

An informal public hearing was held on February 22, 1999, as scheduled. This provided an opportunity for the

petitioner and the public to provide their inputs, which will be useful in the preparation of the Director’s Decision
Report on Status of Public Petitions

Under 10 CFR 2.206 with No Status Change from Previous Update 

February 28, 1999

(Table of Contents)

Attachment 2

 Page

Facility Petitioner/EDO No. 

No.

Connecticut Yankee Bassilakis,Citizens Awareness 

Network (CAN)/GT97181 .....................2

Connecticut Yankee and Millstone Katz, Citizens Awareness 

 Network(CAN)/GT96919...................3

Millstone Galatis, We the People, 

 Inc./EDO603....................................4
2

Attachment 2

Report on 

Status of Public Petitions

Under 10CFR 2.206 with No Status Change from Previous Update 

Facility: Connecticut Yankee

Petitioners: R. Bassilakis, Citizens Awareness Network

(CAN) and P. Gunter, Nuclear Information and

Resource Service (NIRS)

Date of Petition: 3/11/97

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 3/20/97

EDO Number: GT97181

OGC Number: P-97-003

Scheduled Completion Date: 4/30/99

Last Contact with Petitioners: 1/15/99

Petition Manager: T. Fredrichs

Case Attorney: M. Rafky

Issues/Action Requested:

Petitioners request (1) that the NRC commence enforcement action against Connecticut

Yankee (CY) (Haddam Neck) by means of a large civil penalty to assure compliance with

safety-based radiological control routines, (2) modification of CY's license to prohibit any

decommissioning activity, which would include dismantling or decontamination, until CY

manages to conduct routine maintenance of the facility without any contamination events for at

least 6 months, and (3) placement of CY on the NRC's "watch list."

Background:

An acknowledgment letter was issued on 4/3/97. The petitioner was contacted by telephone on

7/9/97 and informed of the status of the petition. A partial Director's Decision (DD-97-19) was

issued on 9/3/97. DD-97-19 denied requests (2) and (3) above. In a public meeting on

10/27/97, which the petitioner attended, the staff stated that it was pursuing enforcement action

regarding the remaining open item in the petition. Request (1) regarding enforcement action

has been deferred and will be the subject of a final Director's Decision, currently scheduled for

4/30/99. 

Current Status:

There is no change in status for this update.
3

Facility: Connecticut Yankee and Millstone Units 1,

2, and 3

Petitioners: D. Katz, Citizens Awareness Network (CAN)

and P. Gunter, Nuclear Information and

Resource Service

Date of Petition: 11/25/96, as amended 12/23/96

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 12/20/96

EDO Number: GT96919

OGC Number: P-96-026

Scheduled Completion Date: TBD*

Last Contact with Petitioners: 2/1/99

Petition Manager: S. Dembek

Case Attorney: R. Hoefling

Issues/Action Requested:

Petitioners request the staff to take the following actions: (1) immediately suspend or revoke

Northeast Utilities' (NU’s) license to operate the Connecticut Yankee (CY) (Haddam Neck) and

Millstone reactors due to chronic mismanagement; (2) investigate the possibility that NU made

material misrepresentations to the NRC concerning engineering calculations and other

information or actions relied upon to assure the adequacy of safety systems at CY and

Millstone; (3) if an investigation determines that NU deliberately provided insufficient and/or

false or misleading information to the NRC, revoke NU's operating licenses for CY and

Millstone, or, if not, keep the reactors off-line pending a Department of Justice independent

investigation; (4) if the reactors remain operating, petitioners request that they remain on the

NRC's "watch list"; (5) keep CY and Millstone off-line until NU's chronic mismanagement has

been analyzed, remedial management programs put into effect and the NRC has evaluated and

approved the effectiveness of NU's actions; (6) in the event NU decides to decommission any

or all of the reactors at issue, petitioners request the NRC not to permit any decommissioning

activity to take place until the above issues are resolved; and (7) commence an investigation

into how the staff allowed the illegal situation at NU's Connecticut reactors to exist and continue

over a decade.

Background:

A partial Director's Decision (DD-97-21) addressing most of the issues was issued to the

petitioners on 9/12/97. DD-97-21 partially granted some of the petitioner's requests. Request

(3) above was partially deferred for the Millstone plants and will be addressed in a subsequent

final Director's Decision.

Current Status:

There is no change in status for this update. 

* Uncertainty in date is due to requirement to issue pending Enforcement Action(EA) prior to

issuing final portion of DD. Once EA is issued a schedule for completion of DD will be

developed.
4

Facility: Millstone

Petitioners: G. Galatis and E. Hadley on behalf of We the People,

Inc.

Date of Petition: 8/21/95, supplemented 8/28/95

Director's Decision To Be Issued by: NRR

Date Referred to Review Organization: 8/30/95

EDO Number: 603

OGC Number: P-95-015

Scheduled Completion Date: TBD*

Last Contact with Petitioner(s): 2/1/99

Petition Manager: S. Dembek

Case Attorney: R. Hoefling

Issues/Action Requested:

The petitioners allege that Northeast Utilities (NU) has offloaded more fuel assemblies into the spent fuel pool t

permitted under License Amendments 39 and 40; that NU has knowingly operated Millstone in violation of its

operating licenses; and that NU has submitted material false statements. Petitioners seek a 60-day license

suspension for Millstone Unit 1 (after the unit is brought into compliance with the license and the design basis).

petitioners also request that the operating license be revoked until the facility is in full compliance with the terms

conditions of its license; before reinstatement of the license, a detailed independent analysis of the offsite dose

consequences of total loss of spent fuel pool water be conducted; that enforcement action be taken against NU

pursuant to 10 CFR 50.5 and 50.9; that actions be taken regarding a proposed license amendment pending be

the Commission wherein NU seeks to increase the amount of spent fuel it may offload and that the amendment

denied; that the NRC retain an independent expert, at NU's expense, to prepare a safety analysis report on the

proposed amendment; and that, before the issuance of any amendment, an analysis including both the probab

and consequences of applicable events be conducted. In the supplement, Mr. Galatis raised additional concern

including concerns at Millstone Units 2 and 3 and Seabrook.

Background:

Northeast Utilities (NU) provided its responses in 9/22/95 and 10/11/95 letters. The acknowledgment letter was

issued on 10/26/95. On 12/26/96, the staff issued a partial Director's Decision (DD-96-23) that addressed the

technical aspects of the petitioners' requests. The staff conducted an informal public hearing with the petitione

April 18, 1998. The wrongdoing aspects are still under review and will be addressed in a subsequent final Dire

Decision. An enforcement panel met on 10/13/98. Region I has drafted a Commission paper to resolve the

enforcement issues associated with this petition. Final resolution and the schedule for completion of the petitio

occur following resolution of enforcement issues. 

Current Status:

There is no change in status for this update. 

* Uncertainty in date is due to requirement to issue pending Enforcement Action(EA) prior to

issuing final portion of DD. Once EA is issued a schedule for completion of DD will be

developed.

Attachment 3

Report on Status of Public Petitions Under 10 CFR 2.206 with

 Decisions Pending Before the Commission and the Courts.

<< ---- NOT FOR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION----->>
1

DELETED

END OF STATUS REPORT

<<<---NOT FOR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION--->>>
1

Attachment 4

Report on Status of Public Petitions

Under 10 CFR 2.206 for DDs Issued and/or Closed During the Calender

Year 1999

NRR:

OGC Number Facility Name Petition Manager DD Date Closure Date

G980568 Haddam Neck T. Fredrichs 1/12/99 2/8/99

G980358 Vermont Yankee R. Croteau 12/7/98 1/5/99

GT97724 D.C.Cook J. Stang 2/11/99 3/11/99

G980233 Vermont Yankee R. Croteau 2/10/99 3/11/99

G19980707 Diablo Canyon S. Bloom 3/12/99**

NMSS:

G19980547 Atlas Corporation Myron Fliegel 1/20/99 2/16/99

** Denotes petitions that will be closed after the Commission’s 25-day review period.

* Not considered to be a petition under 10 CFR 2.206 
1