alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of the National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NUREG-1873)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1873 (PDF - 6.40 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2007**Date Published:**December 2007

Division of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared in response to an application submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to renew the operating license for the National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR) for a period of an additional 20 years. This is the second operating license renewal application for the NBSR. The first license renewal was granted May 16, 1984, and included a power uprate from 10 megawatts of thermal power (MWt) to 20 MWt. This EIS includes the NRC staff's analysis that considers and weighs the environmental impacts of the proposed action, as well as mitigation measures available for reducing or avoiding adverse impacts. It also includes the staff's recommendation regarding the proposed action.

No public comments were received during the scoping process. Two comment letters – one from the U.S. Department of the Interior and one from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – were received during the comment period provided for review of the Draft EIS. These comment letters are provided in Appendix B, part II of this Final EIS. The staff determined from ts review of the application that no issues having a significant environmental impact exist, and additional mitigation measures are not likely to be sufficiently beneficial as to be warranted.

The NRC staff's recommendation is that the Commission determines the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for the NBSR are not so great that license renewal would be unreasonable. This recommendation is based on (1) the Environmental Report submitted by NIST; (2) consultation with Federal, State, and local agencies; and (3) the staff's own independent review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
f8k013111ex4i_bigstring.htm


EXHIBIT 4.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Convertible Note (this “Amendment”) is made this 31st day of January, 2011, by and between BigString Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and Alpha Capital Anstalt (the “Holder”), and amends that certain Convertible Note dated May 1, 2007 in the principal amount of $250,000 issued by the Borrower to the Holder (the “Note”).  The Borrower and the Holder are each occasionally referred to herein as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of that certain Agreement and Release of even date herewith by and between the Borrower and the Holder (the “Agreement and Release”) and in exchange for the consideration described therein, the Parties have agreed to amend the Note on the terms set forth in this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and other agreements contained in the Agreement and Release, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.           The introductory paragraph of the Note is amended in its entirety as follows:


 


“For value received, BigString Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to Alpha Capital Anstalt (the “Holder”), without demand, the sum of $250,000, with simple and unpaid interest thereon, on May 1, 2012 (the “Maturity Date”), if not paid sooner.”


 


2.           Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.           This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and acknowledged this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 




	 	BIGSTRING CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Darin Myman 	 
	 	Name:	Darin Myman	 
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 







 



	 	ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Konrad Ackermann 	 
	 	Name:	Konrad Ackermann	 
	 	Title:	Director
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:43 PM

To: Armstrong, Ashley; Anderson, Wes

Subject: Ex-Parte Meeting Summary

To Whom It May Concern:

On December 12, 2011 a meeting was held amongst Wes Anderson (DOE), Ashl ey Armstrong (DOE),

and J.B. Hoyt (Whirlpool Corporation). The purpose was to discuss the definition of a built-in cooking

product which includes one conventional radiant oven cavity and one microwave oven cavity, with both

controlled by a single control panel. Hoyt provided ph otos of a representative model to clarify the

configuration. The parties agreed that this product type does not directly fit into any existing definition.

Anderson & Armstrong agreed to put forth a prelimin ary position prior to the comment deadline of

December 23, 2011.

The parties also discussed the MWO test procedure; DOE is seeking any data from the European testing

experience that may help in their te st procedure development. Whirlpool will seek to determine what data

is available.



## ■ J.B. HOYT // DIRECTOR, SUSTAINABILITY & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

Office 269.923.4647 // Cell 269.277.1032 // Whirlpool Corporation // www.WhirlpoolCorp.com

2000 M

‐ 63 North // MD 3005 // Benton Harbor, MI 49022

NOTICE: Whirlpool Corporation e

‐ mail is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,

or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e

‐ mail in error, please notify the sender immediately

and delete the original. Any other use of the e

‐ mail by you is unauthorized.

 Please consider the environment before printing this e

‐ mail
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis D.
Oklak, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership.



/s/ Dennis D. OklakDennis D. OklakChairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General PartnerDate: May 11, 2011


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT STOCK FOR SERVICES



         This Agreement is entered into on April 25, 2001 by and between
Knowledge Transfer Systems, Inc. ("KTSI") and Phillip Eich ("Shareholder").

1.      KTSI is a publicly  held company  currently  trading on the OTC market
        under the ticker  symbol KTSI.  KTSI was formerly known as GoThink!.com.
        Inc.

2.      Shareholder has provided services to KTSI during the past 12 months
        either as an employee, contractor or consultant. The parties stipulate
        to the value of these services as being $37,500.

3.      Shareholder has not received any payment or other remuneration for the
        provision of these services to KTSI.

4.      As full payment of the services provided by Shareholder to KTSI, the
        parties agree and stipulate that Shareholder will receive 750,000 shares
        ("the Shares") of common stock of KTSI.  KTSI will agree to register,
        on behalf of Shareholder the Shares under Regulation S-8, so that the
        Shares will become "free trading" shares.

5.      In addition to the Shares,  the parties have agreed that Shareholder
        will purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares (the "Purchase Shares") of
        KTSI common stock at a purchase price of 5 cents per shares, for a total
        purchase price of $50,000. The payment for such shares shall be made in
        the form of a non-recourse promissory note issued by Shareholder in
        favor of KTSI which note shall be due and  payable on December 31, 2003.
        The Purchase shares shall be issued by KTSI immediately, but shall be
        restricted under applicable securities laws and shall also be subject to
        a "Lockup/Leakout" agreement with KTSI for a period of 24 months, in a
        form suitable to both parties.

6.      The parties both release each other from all other forms of compensation
        or obligations except for the obligations specifically referenced
        herein, and Shareholder agrees that he/she has been fully compensated
        for all services rendered on behalf of KTSI, or its predecessor.

7.      This agreement shall be governed in accordance with Nevada law, and
        shall govern all matters related to the issues contained herein.

                                                Knowledge Transfer Systems, Inc.



                                                /s/Steve Burke
                                                ________________________________
                                                By: Steve Burke, President


                                                "Shareholder"




                                                /s/Phillip Eich
                                                ________________________________
                                                Phillip Eich
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance Budget/Congressional Budget Justification (NUREG-1100)

# Performance Budget: Fiscal Year 2007 (NUREG-1100, Volume 22)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Overview

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1100, Volume 22 (PDF - 11.3 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: February 2006

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Overview

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) fiscal year (FY) 2007 Performance Budget provides the resources necessary to carry out the agency's mission, including the new responsibilities and requirements in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The NRC's proposed FY 2007 budget is $777 million, which represents an increase of $35 million over the FY 2006 budget. The FY 2007 budget is offset by $628 million from fees assessed to NRC licensees, resulting in a net appropriation of $149 million.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 28, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2025
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2002

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 28, 2022
EXHIBIT 32

# Written Statement of
the Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, we, the undersigned acting principal executive officer and
chief financial officer of Fresh Brands, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended January 3, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael R. HouserMichael R. HouserVice Chairman
of the Board, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Marketing Officer

/s/ John H. DahlyJohn H. Dahly Executive Vice President,
Chief FinancialOfficer, Secretary and Treasurer

Date: March 18, 2004
# L_2015328EN.01012601.xml

| 12.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/126

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2015/2290 of 12 June 2015 on the provisional equivalence of the solvency regimes in force in Australia, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States and applicable to insurance and reinsurance undertakings with head offices in those countries

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 323 of 9 December 2015
  )

On the cover page and on pages 22 and 26, the adoption date (title and signature) of the Delegated Decision:

for:

‘
  12 June 2015
  ’,

read:

‘
  5 June 2015
  ’.

---
### MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MDLV ANEY 

## & CARPENTER, LLP

ALBERTJ. PUCCIARELLI Direct dial: (201) 493-3718 apucciarelli@mdmc-law.com

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 40 West Ridgewood Avenue Ridgewood, NJ 07450 (201) 445-6722 FACSIMILE (201) 445-5376
March 30, 2015

Re: Petition ofNext Generation Aviation Services, L.L.C. ("Petitioner") for an Exemption Pursuantto Section 33 3 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is in follow up to ourApplication dated December 15,2014. We note that our Application for Exemption has been subjectedto public comment for more than 45 days. We would appreciate your letting us knowthe status ofour Application. Also, at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-1055-0001 there is a typo inthe name ofthe Petitioner. "L.CL.C." should be "L.L.C.". We would appreciate thatbeing corrected at your convenience. Very truly yours,
AJP:gdm Cc: Mr. Frank R. Galella, III

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANif> . ·. : · ·CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO ,. DELAWARE
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Annual Report") of Midwest
Generation, LLC (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the
best of his knowledge and belief, that:

| |  | /s/ Guy F. GorneyGuy F. Gorney
Manager and President
Midwest Generation, LLC             
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ W. James ScilacciW. James Scilacci
Manager and Vice President
Midwest Generation, LLC

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Midwest Generation, LLC and will be retained by Midwest Generation, LLC and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Thousand, Respondent, vs. Ray and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *McGeever, McGeever & Leahy*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Crownhart & Murphy,*attorneys, and *Frank C. Grandy*of counsel, all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

-Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 10.42










	






     Exhibit
10.42  





AMENDMENT TO WARRANT

TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK



     This
Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (the “Amendment”)
is made and entered into as of June 5, 2000, by and between The Gymboree
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
____________ (the “Holder”), the holder of a Warrant to Purchase
Common Stock (the “Warrant”). 



RECITALS











	A.		
On June 2, 2000, the Company issued the Warrant to purchase _________ shares of
the Company’s Common Stock to the Holder in connection with equity
investment made by such Holder on May ___, 2000 (the “Equity
Investment”). 






	B. 		Pursuant
to Section 1(b) of the Warrant, the Warrant is exercisable after the date that is six (6)
months after June 2, 2000. 








	C.		
In consideration of the Company’s promise to make the Warrant exercisable
as of the date that is six (6) months from May 16, 2000, the Company and the
Holder of the Warrant wish to amend Section 1(b). 






AGREEMENT



	 	     1. 
The first sentence of Section 1(b) shall be amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:






	 	     (b) 
Net Exercise. In lieu of exercising this Warrant in a cash exercise, after November 16,
2000, the Holder may elect to exercise this Warrant in whole or in part, on a “net
exercise” basis, and upon such net exercise shall be entitled to receive shares equal
to the value of the portion of this Warrant canceled upon such net exercise.







	 	     2. 
All other terms and conditions in the Warrant shall remain unchanged.






			THE GYMBOREE CORPORATION



By:  
        ——————————————

Print Name:  Lawrence H. Meyer
Title:    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1


Form
10-K


Bio-Path
Holdings, Inc.


File No.
000-53404














CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-156054) of Bio-Path Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March 31,
2009 relating to the financial statements for the period ended December 31,
2008, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
Mantyla McReynolds LLC





Salt Lake
City, Utah


March 31,
2009
#### Arthur Chatham *v.*Lucy Boykin.

J- From Northampton.

Ex’r & Adm’r. To a *sci. fa.*upon a refunding bond, Defendant pleaded that the debt recovered against the Administrator was no* justly due, and that the Administrator fraudulently and collusively with the Plaintiff, confessed the judgment.

The burthen of proof lies on the Defendant to verify his plea by proof pf the fraud, othcrwsse judgment must be rendered against him bn the *sci. fa.*

After a decree on a petition, a *sci. fa.*may issue on the refunding bonds given by distributees ; it is within the spirit of the act giv. ing the *sci. fa.*

This was a *sci. fa.*upon a refunding bond given by the Defendant, to which he pleaded, that the judgment stated in the *sci. fa.*to have been recovered against the Administrator, was not justly duej and that the Administrator fraudulently and in collusion with the Plaintiff, suffered the judgment to be entered against him by confession. To this plea there was a demurrer, and issue joined thereon.

Hah, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

If that part of the plea which states, that no debt was due by the Administrator, stood as a distinct plea to itself and was to be allowed, it would be incumbent on the Plaintiff to prove his demand upon the *sci. fa.*after having obtained judgment against the Administrator, and that too merely at the suggestion of the Defendant, which ought not to be allowed. But when the Defendant, in addition to that suggestion, states that thejudg-*302incut was fraudulently obtained, he places the burthen of proof on himself, and the judgment remains good, un-till lie verifies his *plea;*upon doing which, judgment ought not to be entered against him on the *sci.fa.*The plea appears to be indivisible, and in substance this, that the judgment against the Administrator was obtained through fraud, and this fact he may substantiate if he can. The demurrer should be overruled.

An objecüon has been raised in the argument of the case, to the form of the process in this case, and it is contended that a *sci.fa.*cannot issue from a decree on a petition. Although this objection is not presented by the pleadings, the Court have no hesitation in saying, that the objection is unfounded. It is convenient and within Hie spirit of the act of Assembly, which gives the *sci.fa.*on the bonds of distributees, where their shares have been delivered to them.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffSafety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-0

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 (NUREG-0847, Supplement 26)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0847, Supplement 26 (PDF - 1.69 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**:  May 2013**Date Published**:  June 2013

**Docket No. 50-391**: Tennessee Valley Authority

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report supplements the safety evaluation report (SER), NUREG-0847 (June 1982), Supplement No. 25 (November 2011, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12011A024), with respect to the application filed by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), as applicant and owner, for a license to operate Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 (Docket No 50-391).

In its SER and Supplemental SER (SSER) Nos. 1 through 20 issued by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC staff documented its safety evaluation and determination that WBN Unit 1 met all applicable regulations and regulatory guidance. Based on satisfactory findings from all applicable inspections, on February 7, 1996, the NRC issued a full-power operating license (OL) to WBN Unit 1, authorizing operation up to 100-percent power.

In SSER 21, the NRC staff addressed TVA's application for a license to operate WBN Unit 2, and provided information regarding the status of the items remaining to be resolved, which were outstanding at the time that TVA deferred construction of WBN Unit 2, and were not evaluated and resolved as part of the licensing of WBN Unit 1. Beginning with SSER 22, the NRC staff documented its ongoing evaluation and closure of open items in support of TVA's application for a license to operate WBN Unit 2.

In this and future SSERs, the NRC staff continues its documentation of its review of open items in support of TVA's application for an operating license for WBN Unit 2.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Will of Dorn: West, Appellant, vs. Roick and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Evans, Flom & Alstad,*attorneys, and *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of counsel, all of Madison.

For the respondents: *A. W. Kopp*of Platteville.

*By the Court.*

— Order affirmed.