alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,411,727
<SECURITIES>                                 5,285,555
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,225,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,173,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,282,592
<PP&E>                                       7,436,064
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,572,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,059,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,946,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,458
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,629,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,059,278
<SALES>                                      3,338,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,934,326
<CGS>                                        2,851,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,147,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,534
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5115-5116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention--Health Disparities Subcommittee (HDS)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
subcommittee:

    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. EST, February 26, 2015.
    Place: This meeting will be held by teleconference.
    Status: This meeting is open to the public, limited only by the 
availability of telephone ports. The public is welcome to 
participate during the public comment, which is tentatively 
scheduled from 12:15 to 12:30 p.m. To participate in the 
teleconference, please dial (866) 763-0273 Passcode: 6158968.
    Purpose: The Subcommittee will provide advice to the CDC 
Director through the ACD on strategic and other health disparities 
and

[[Page 5116]]

health equity issues and provide guidance on opportunities for CDC.
    Matters for Discussion: The Health Disparities Subcommittee 
members will discuss progress toward implementation of the Health 
Disparities Subcommittee recommendations and discussion of the 
Healthy People 2020 progress review on social determinants of health 
and LGBT health.
    The agenda is subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Leandris Liburd, Ph.D., 
M.P.H., M.A., Designated Federal Officer, Health Disparities 
Subcommittee, Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE., M/S K-77, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Telephone (770) 488-8343, 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5e9e0e994e5c6c1c68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="baf6fff68bfad9ded994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 2015-01766 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-14-00176-CR

 02-14-00177-CR

QUINN FORD, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1267457D, 1267459D

------------

CORRECTED ORDER

------------

We have considered the court reporter’s request for an extension of time to 

file the reporter’s record in this appeal. 

The request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is ORDERED due for 

filing in this court no later than Wednesday, October 22, 2014. NO FURTHER 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SHOULD BE NECESSARY.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of the order to the 

attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the court reporter.

DATED September 30, 2014.

PER CURIAM
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41681 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JORGE ARMANDO MIRELES

- IBARRA, also known as Jose Morales , Defendant

- Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 1253

- 1
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant

- Appellant Jorge Armando Mireles

- Ibarra pleaded guilty to illegal ly reentering the United States. His 34

- month, within

- Guidelines sentence incl uded an eight

- level enhancement because the district court determined that , prior to his firs t deportation in 2007, Mireles

- Ibarra had “sustained a conviction for a felony offense for which the sentence imposed was two years or more.” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2)(B). Specifically, Mireles

- Ibarra ’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 10, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41681 Document: 00514111650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2017No. 16

- 41681

2 2007 deportation followed his conviction and 10

- year p robationary sentence, under Texas law, for burglary of a habitation

. After he returned illegally in 2011 , Mireles

- Ibarra violated his probation , and the state court adjudicated him guilty of burglary and sentenced him to two years of imprisonment. On app eal, Mireles

- Ibarra contends that the district court reversibly erred by applying the challenged enhancement because, contrary to the mandate of § 2L1.2 , his two

- year custodial sentence on the 2007 Texas burglary conviction was not imposed until after he “was ordered deported or ordered removed from the United States for the first time.” § 2L1.2(b)(2)

. Even assum ing without decidin g that the district court erred, w e conclude that any error was harmless

. See United States v. Martinez

- Romero , 817 F.3d 917 , 924 (5th Cir. 2016). The record indicates that the basis for Mireles

- Ibarra’s 34

- month sentence was not the applicable guidelines range , but instead was the inadequacy of the 30

- month sentence he had recently served on a prior illegal reentry convict ion , which the district court determined warranted a “slightly higher” sentence in this case. Cf

. United States v. Ibarra

Luna , 628 F.3d 712, 718

- 19 (5th Cir. 2010)

. T he court explained that such a sentence was “necessary” to satisfy the ends of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) , notwithstanding any guidelines error

. Cf

. United States v. Bonilla , 524 F.3d 647, 656

- 57 (5th Cir. 2008)

. Th e error does not warrant vacating the sentence. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-41681 Document: 00514111650 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2017
No: IV-19-015 September 4, 2019

Contact: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Neil Day as 

the new resident inspector at the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant in 

Glen Rose, Texas. 

Day joined the NRC in 2008 as a structural engineer in the Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards at NRC Headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. He worked as a project engineer in the Division of 

Reactor Projects in the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa., 

and served as the resident inspector at the Grand Gulf nuclear power 

plant in Port Gibson, Miss. 

Day holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Pennsylvania State University.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. Day 

joins acting senior resident inspector Michael Chambers. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at 

the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**646 CAF 12-01975**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PAULINE KEICHER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DONALD SCHEIFLA, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

EVELYNE A. O’SULLIVAN, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

BERNADETTE M. HOPPE, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie Bailey, J.), entered October 1, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner brought a petition in March 2012 pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 alleging that respondent committed various family offenses. Family Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, without prejudice, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). We affirm. The court determined that, because the petition failed to specify when the alleged incidents occurred, the court was unable to ascertain whether the allegations were the subject of a December 2011 hearing following which the court dismissed the petition for failure to prove the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. Any allegations concerning events that were the subject of the 2011 hearing were barred by collateral estoppel ( see Maybaum v Maybaum
, 89 AD3d 692, 695), and thus the petition would have been properly dismissed to that extent. We are unable to review the propriety of the court’s decision, however, because petitioner failed to include in the record on appeal either the petition that was the subject of the 2011 hearing or the transcript of that hearing. Petitioner, “as the appellant, submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences” ( Matter of Santoshia L.
, 202 AD2d 1027, 1028).

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00730

- CV
In Re Estate of Angelita B. Garza, Deceased

On Appeal from the 229th District Court of Starr County , Texas Trial Cause No. DC

- 05

- 260

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court
orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this deci sion certified below for observance. June 18, 2015
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-152283) of our report dated March 9, 2009, relating to the financial statements of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and2007, and the period from August 1, 2005 (inception) through December 31, 2008, which includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Hays & Company LLP 

New York, New York 

March 11, 2009
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73 (NUREG-1022)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 17, 2024
#### Plaettner, Appellant, vs. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Julius 0. Roehl*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Bloodgood, Stebbins & Bloodgood,*attorneys, and *Eric Wm. Passmore*and *Harold J. Porter*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
31.2 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas M. Finn, certify that:1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
  of Speedus Corp.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
  evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
  over financial reporting; and5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have
  disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of  internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
  auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
  persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
May 15, 2007By:
/s/ Thomas M. FinnName:
Thomas M. FinnTitle:
Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer 18
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Review Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : ^/^Q^\D•j>cn'^^^4^^ ^ tJA-tt* ^ ^ ^/ S ^ ^ Oj>A^\& ^ I n

^ RIN : PIOS-AD H ( ^ Wit hrespec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulatory Affair s (OIRA) . y \N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Act for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O (§801 ) hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

X Thi s documen t

i s no t afina l rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . 

## /f^^^-^^^^^? ^ Signatur e Nam e , 

### D^p^+ ^ A^iv>^/ ^

Oen^rf^ ^ CoM^>e / Title/Offic e 

# 0 ^ 1 

# \(>l n Dal e

05/26/201 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable Randy C. Huffman 

Secretary, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 

Division of Air Quality 

601 57th Street, SE 

Charleston, WV 25304-2943 

Dear Secretary Huffman: 

AUG 2 0 2012 

On March 6, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental 

Protection. This revision requests redesignation of the West Virginia portion of the ParkersburgMarietta, WV-OH 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area to attainment and approval of the Area's 

maintenance plan. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically 

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Marilyn Po~ers, Air 

Quality Planning Branch, at (215) 814-2308. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

cc: John Benedict, WVDEP 

Fred Durham, WVDEP 

Sincerely, 

~tCAAA-o._~ Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# 2D/3D Program Work Summary Report (NUREG/IA-0126, GRS–100, MPR–1345)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0126 (PDF 17.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** June 1993

**Edited by:** P. S. Damerell, J. W. Simons, MPR Associates, Inc.

**Prepared Jointly by:** Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Gesellschaft fuer Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit Siemens AG, UB KWU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Los Alamos National Laboratory MPR Associates, Inc.

**Prepared as part of:** Arrangement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange between the Federal Minister for Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany (BMFT) and the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) in a Coordinated Analytical and Experimental Study of the Thermo-hydraulic Behavior of Emergency Core Coolant during the Refill and Reflood Phase of a Loss-of-Coolant Accident in a Pressurized Water Reactor (the 2D/3D Program).

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The 2D/3D Program was carried out by Germany, Japan and the United States to investigate the thermal-hydraulics of a PWR large-break LOCA. A contributory approach was utilized in which each country contributed significant effort to the program and all three countries shared the research results. Germany constructed and operated the Upper Plenum Test Facility (UPTF), and Japan constructed and operated the Cylindrical Core Test Facility (CCTF) and the Slab Core Test Facility (SCTF). The US contribution consisted of provision of advanced instrumentation to each of the three test facilities, and assessment of the TRAC computer code against the test results. Evaluations of the test results were carried out in all three countries. This report summarizes the 2D/3D Program in terms of the contributing efforts of the participants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI~ F r; E I v ED 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS DEC 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

Complainant 

Vs. 

PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPT. 

Respondent 

2 9 2016 

HLo.,'iiNG DOCKET 

Docket No. FAA-2013-1086 

FAA Case No. 2011S0190181 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

MOTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME 

Hereby appears Respondent, Puerto Rico Police Department, represented by the 

subscribing counsel, and states, alleges and requests as follows: 

1. On November 9, 2016 Respondent received by certified mail FAA's first Discovery 

Request of Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents and Request for 

Admission. 

2. The hereby appearing party has been compiling the pertinent information to 

respond to the above. Nevertheless, as of this date, there is still certain 

information that Respondent is verifying. 

3. In order to responsibly provide all relevant information and documents, in 

accordance with Rule 6 (b) of the Rules of Federal Procedures, we are 

respectfully requesting an extension of 20 days to answer FAA's First Discovery 

Requests. 
Page 2 of 2 

Respectfully submitted this 7 day of December 2016. 

\,~ll{)d ~t4f7y~} . Nazih:c{~~i:lrahman Soler [__--

Attorney 

Office of Legal Affairs 

PO Box 71200 

San Juan, PR 00936 

Phone 787-793-1234 ext. 3067, 2203 

Fax. 787-781-7993 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion Requesting Extension of Time 

has been sent by the following methods: 

Original and one copy via certified mail on December 7, 2016: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

One copy via certified mail on December 7, 2016: 

Christopher R. Stevenson 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536