alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pattern Sample Image AveragePictureLevel(APL)Usage Advantages Disadvantages3-Bar VideoSignal50%Has been thedefaultluminance testpattern for thedisplay industryInitiallydeveloped foruse with CRTdisplaysAlready referenced by ENERGYSTAR, CEC and IECPattern widely available on DVD orBlu-ray test discsCommon sense appeal – midwaybetween full white and full blackAPL higher than typical TV programcontentNo reference point for verticalcenteringForces plasma displays into a powerlimiting state, producing a lowerluminance level than with testpatterns with lower APLsIndustry experts recommend movingto a pattern more representative ofbroadcast contentIEC is considering moving to a newtest pattern in the next revision of62087Static pattern – not representative ofdynamic video typical of TV programcontent9-Point VideoSignal17%Used byChinese TV testprocedure andISO/IEC testprocedure forfront projectorsArguably, achieves more accurateabsolute measurements forplasmasWhite target is in the middle ofscreenAs part of a luminance ratio maydisproportionately disadvantagesome plasmasAPL lower than typical TV programcontentStatic pattern – not representative ofdynamic video typical of TV programcontentDOE 5-PointVideo Signal34%Developed byDOE as part ofthis proposedtest procedureAPL of typical broadcast contentWhite target is in the middle ofscreenSimilar in appearance to anavailable VESA 5-point pattern(RT01BN)Static pattern – not representative ofdynamic video typical of TV programcontentDynamic VideoSignal1~34%In developmentby DOE andIEC as part ofthis proposedtest procedureand IEC’s nextupdateAPL of typical broadcast contentNot a static image – representativeof dynamic video typical of TVprogram contentMay be taken forward by IEC andbecome part of IEC 62087 update.Pattern not yet finalized by DOE andIECMeasurement procedure yet to bedetermined1ThispatternwascreatedusingtheIEC620872008testclipwithblackandwhitesquaresinthecenterofthescreenasmeasurementpoints.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Industry-Average Performance for Components and Initiating Events at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6928)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6928 (PDF - 17.6 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2007**Published:**February 2007

**Prepared by:** S.A. Eide1, T.E. Wierman1, C.D. Gentillon1, D.M. Rasmuson2 C.L. Atwood3

1Idaho National Laboratory Risk, Reliability and NRC Programs Department Idaho Falls, ID 83415

3Statwood Consulting 2905 Covington Road Silver Spring, MD 20910

Anne-Marie Grady, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**2Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6546

Availability Notice

## Abstract

 This report characterizes current industry-average performance for components and initiating events at U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Studies have indicated that industry performance has improved since the 1980s and early 1990s, so the characterization of current industry-average performance is an important step in maintaining up-to-date risk models. Four types of events are covered: component unreliability (e.g., pump fail to start or fail to run), component or train unavailability resulting from test or maintenance outages, special event probabilities covering operational issues (e.g., pump restarts and injection valve re-openings during unplanned demands), and initiating event frequencies. Typically data for 1998–2002 were used to characterize current industry-average performance, although many initiating events required longer periods (ending in 2002) to adequately characterize frequencies. Results (beta distributions for failure probabilities upon demand and gamma distributions for rates) are used as inputs to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission standardized plant analysis risk (SPAR) models covering U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
THERMACELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         Computation of Loss Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                            For the Three Months Ended                     For the Six Months Ended
                                                     March 31,                                     March 31,
                                          -------------------------------------     -----------------------------------------
                                                2000                   1999                   2000                   1999

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>                  <C>                     <C>
Shares  outstanding:                         11,033,653              7,294,325             11,033,653              7,294,325
Weighted average shares outstanding          10,171,153              8,452,420              9,971,153              7,593,643
Net loss                                 $   (3,376,728)         $    (259,396)       $    (4,298,787)        $     (481,474)
                                          ------------------    -------------------     ------------------    ----------------

Net loss per common share                $       (0.33)          $       (0.03)       $         (0.43)        $        (0.06)
                                          ==================    ===================     ==================    ================

</TABLE>
#### State ex rel. Blaine, Attorney General, vs. Fairchild, Circuit Judge, and others.

*September 25*

December *14, 1920.*

On a motion to quash an alternative writ of *mandamus*restraining the enforcement of the judgment of the court in the case of *Milwaxikee v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co., ante,*p. 400, the decision in that case controls, and the motion to quash is denied.

ORIGINAL action of *mandamus.*

*J. J. Blaine,*attorney general, and *M. B. Olbrich,*deputy attorney .general, for relator.

*Van Dyke, Shazv, Musk at & Van Dyke*and *Miller, Mack & Fair-child,*all of Milwaukee, and *Clifton Williams,*city attorney, for defendants.

Vinje, J.

*Mandamus*sued out of this court to restrain the circuit court and parties in the case of *City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company*from carrying into effect the judgment entered therein, and especially that part of it requiring passengers from outside of the city limits but within the single-fare zone, as established by the railroad commission, or passengers from the city going to some point in the single-fare zone outside the city, to pay an additional fare at the city limits. In view of the decision herewith rendered in the case of *City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co., ante,*p. 400, 180 N. W. 339, the petition is held to contain all the essential facts necessary to state a cause of action, and the city’s motion to quash the alternative writ of *mandamus*is denied.

*By the Court.*— Motion to quash the alternative writ of *mandamus*is denied.
PSD Permit Application for GHGs and Related 

Documents 

 

 

(Updated November 2013)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3550-3551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1958]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone Under 
the Alternative Site Framework, Cameron Parish, Louisiana

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    WHEREAS, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    WHEREAS, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    WHEREAS, the West Cameron Port Commission (the Grantee), a 
Louisiana political subdivision, has made application to the Board (B-
23-2014, docketed 03/12/2014) requesting the

[[Page 3551]]

establishment of a foreign-trade zone under the ASF with a service area 
that includes Wards 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Cameron Parish, Louisiana, 
adjacent to the Lake Charles Customs and Border Protection port of 
entry, and proposed Site 1 would be categorized as a usage-driven site;
    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (79 FR 14666, 03/17/2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 291, as described in the 
application, and subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation 
limit, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites 
that would terminate authority for Site 1 if no foreign-status 
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose within three 
years from the month of approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of January 2015.
Penny Pritzker,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer, Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board.
ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01236 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

 

**AMENDMENTFIVE TO THE1995 SHAREHOLDER VALUE PLAN OFDUKE REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

 

This AmendmentFive to the 1995 Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services LimitedPartnership, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted this 26thday of October, 2005, by Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”). Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the meaning set forth inthe Plan.

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, thePartnership adopted the Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and

 

WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors or theCommittee has the right to amend the Plan with respect to certain matters; and

 

WHEREAS, theBoard of Directors has determined that no further awards will be made under thePlan from and after April 27, 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, theCommittee has approved and authorized this Amendment Five to the Plan;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Committee under Section 5.1of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, inthe following particulars:

 

1.  By deleting the last paragraph of Section 1.5of the Plan and substituting therefor the following:

 

“Effective October 30, 2002, the maximum value of the awards payableunder the Plan that would have, absent amendment four to the Plan, been issuedunder the Plan in Company common shares shall be an amount equal to the maximumnumber of Company common shares that could have otherwise been issued under thePlan (which was 200,000 shares after giving effect to the two-for-one stocksplit on August 27, 1997) times the per share New York Stock Exchangeclosing price of such shares on the date such shares would have otherwise beenissued.  The intent of this paragraph is tolimit the value of the awards payable under the Plan after Amendment Four tothe Plan to the value of the awards payable under the Plan before suchAmendment.”

 

All otherprovisions of the Plan shall remain the same.

 

----

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership, by a duly authorized officerof its General Partner, has executed this Amendment Five to the 1995Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership this 26thday of October, 2005.

 
|   | DUKE REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                     |   |   |
|   |                                                     |   |   |
|   | By:  DUKE REALTY CORPORATION,  General Partner |
|   |                                                     |   |   |
|   |                                                     | By: | /S/ Dennis D. Oklak |   |
|   |                                                     |   | Dennis D. Oklak |
|   |                                                     |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                                                              July 22, 1998


                           FOURTEEN HILL CAPITAL, L.P.
                           ---------------------------
                       ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER FINANCINGS
                       ------------------------------------

SAN  FRANCISCO-(July  22, 1998)  Fourteen Hill Capital,  L.P., a majority  owned
affiliate of Point West Capital  Corporation  (which  trades on NASDAQ under the
symbol PWCC) today announced that,  during the second quarter of 1998, it closed
two financings in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000.

Fourteen Hill purchased  $1,000,000 of convertible  preferred stock of FlashNet,
Inc.  FlashNet  (www.flash.net)  is a rapidly growing  Internet Service Provider
headquartered in Ft. Worth, Texas. FlashNet is one of the largest privately held
ISPs in the country,  providing  Internet access to over 175,000  individual and
business  customers  throughout the United States.  FlashNet was recently ranked
third in the nation for  customer  service  quality by an  independent  research
group.

Fourteen Hill purchased a $1,000,000 convertible note from Vaultline,
Inc.  Vaultline  (www.vaultline.net)  is a  telecommunications  carrier based in
Santa Clara,  California.  It provides carrier based services,  Internet access,
and  collocation  facilities to Internet  Service  Providers and corporate users
requiring  bandwidth  capacities of DS1 or greater.  Vaultline's high speed OC48
SONET Rings, and redundant  connections to the Internet,  ensure that customers'
networks and Internet  servers are available 24 hours a day,  seven days a week.
At the same time, Vaultline's collocation services enable them to reduce ongoing
network  operating  costs,  providing  access to multiple NAPs  (Network  Access
Points), and private network infrastructures.

Fourteen  Hill is a Small  Business  Investment  Company  licensed  by the Small
Business  Administration.  Fourteen  Hill provides  capital to small  businesses
(generally  businesses  whose tangible net worth does not exceed $18 million and
whose  average  net  income  during  the  preceding  two years did not exceed $6
million) whose primary businesses are located in the United States.

Commenting on the financings,  Chris Rodskog,  Senior Vice President of Fourteen
Hill   Capital,   said,   "We  are  very  happy  with   these   investments   in
Internet-related  companies and intend to continue to make strategic investments
in similar high growth companies."

Additional information about Fourteen Hill Capital is available on the company's
Web site, http://www.fourteenhill.com, or by calling 415-394-9467.


(KEYWORD CALIFORNIA AND INDUSTRY KEYWORD: Venture Capital, Internet).
                                          ---------------  --------   
CONTACTS:         FOURTEEN HILL CAPITAL, SAN FRANCISCO.
                  CHRIS RODSKOG, 415/394-9467
                  cpr@pointwestcapital.com
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00737-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v. 

Josue Isay DEL CAMPO-CHAVEZ,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11,797

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting Josue 

Isay Del Campo-Chavez’s application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 2, 2023.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

 

 

 

# **INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’CONSENT**

 

 

 

 

We hereby consent to the use in the Form10-KSB of L. Air Holding Inc. (formerly Superior Networks, Inc.) of ourAuditors’ Report, dated February 12, 2002, relating to the balance sheet of L.Air Holding Inc. (formerly Superior Networks, Inc.) as at November 30, 2001,and the related statements of stockholders’ equity, earnings and cash flows forthe year ended November 30, 2001.

 

We also consent to the reference to us underthe heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

 

 

 

 

| Vancouver, Canada |   |                   |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------|
|              |   |                   |
| March 17, 2003    |   | Chartered  Accountants |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit
      23.1**





January
      12, 2007





El
      Capitan Precious Metals Inc.


Suite
      216


14301
      N.
      87th Street


Scottsdale,
      AZ 85260





Gentlemen:




The
      undersigned hereby consents to the reference to the undersigned in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “Annual Report”), including without limitation
      references in Item 3 and the financial statements incorporated in the Annual
      Report, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission.




I
      also
      confirm that I have read each of the references to me in the Annual Report
      and
      concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
      admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by
      Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Sincerely,/s/
              Clyde SmithClyde
              Smith
# L_2015097EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/580

of 26 March 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Krčki pršut (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Krčki pršut’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Krčki pršut’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Krčki pršut’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Krčki pršut’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Krčki pršut’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 412, 19.11.2014, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
No. 86-848.

#### Hayes *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# EPA Listening Session Test i mo n y A lexander Ba rt on , Gree n Tra nsportat io n So luti ons P a rk Rid ge, Illin o i s Me mb e r o f the S ie r ra C lub My c omp a n y i s c ommitt e d to th e u se of e n vi ronm e nta ll y s a fe a n d fue l effic ie nt tra n s port a ti o n option s fo r co rp o r a t e a nd gove rnm e nt ve h icl e fl ee t s. 

### In fac t , we p a rtn e re d w i th th e Mai n e T owns hip H ig h way Depa rtme n t i n Illi no i s t o c r eate a Gree n Fleet Ma n ual which was dist r ibu ted fr ee of c h a rge to every towns h ip in lllino i s. T hi s manua l is also ava i lab le for f ree do wnl oad o n o u r websi t e at www.gr eentra n s porta ti o n solution s. com . Beyo nd cos tly ve hi cl e up g rad es a nd m o di fic ati o n s , we u s u a ll y reco mm e nd three s im p l e ways to red u ce p et ro l eu m cons u m pt ion and GHG e m iss io n s w i th o ur cli e nt s. -T h e fi r s t i s to i n c rease th e u se and ava il a bili ty of biodi esel f u e l s. Most tru cks o nl y u se a b le nd o f 5% b i odi ese l w h e n they c ou ld e f fec ti ve ly u se 20%. In c reas in g bi o di ese l b l e nd s a u tomatica ll y red u ces petro l e um co n s um pt io n whi le prov id i n g rur a l econom ic benefits plus a significant red u ction in GHG emissio n s. -T h e seco nd i s t o prom o t e and e n f or ce an id le -r e d uc ti o n polic y. 

### It i s a f a ct th a t id lin g a n y ve hi c le w i ll get yo u 0 m il es pe r ga ll on . T h e re i s a n Ldling Law a lrea d y o n th e boo k s in Ill ino i s b u t it is r are ly e n forced. T h ere sho ul d be stro n ge r enf o rceme n t n ear communi t ies particula r ly schoo l s and parks. -T h e third i s t o in co rpora t e a tire pr ess ure sc reeni n g sys t e m . Ha v in g pro pe rly infl a t e d ti res i s o n e of t h e s im p l es t ways to in c rease yo u r fu e l econo m y. T h e re a re a l so many safety improveme n ts w hi c h is a lways a good thing. In c onc lu s io n , 1 w ou ld li ke t o tha nk th e a dmini s trat i o n f o r pro p os i n g s ta nd a rd s t o ma ke o ur n at io n s tru cks m ore e ffi c ie nt but I wo ul d r es p ec t f ull y urge yo u to m ake th e sta n dards stro n ge r to h e l p furt h er re du ce fue l u sage u p to 40% by th e year 2025.