alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 4 - Environmental and Siting

# Environmental and Siting (Division 4): Regulatory Guides 4.1 - 4.20

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 4, "Environmental and Siting," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 25, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 4.1 - 4.20
          - Regulatory Guides 4.21 - 4.28

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 25, 2024
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Transient Fire Environment Cable Damageability Test Results (NUREG/CR-4638,  SAND86-0839)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.


Attn: Claudia Pieropan
Hines Horticulture, Inc.
12621 Jeffrey Road
Irvine, California 92620

Date: August 11, 2006

Subject: Consent to Referencing Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. Valuation

Gentlemen and Mesdames,

We hereby consent to the inclusion of references to us and to our reports
relating to the valuation of certain facilities of Hines Nurseries, Inc. and
Hines Horticulture, Inc. ("Hines") in Hines' notes to financial statements
contained in reports and other filings made and to be made by Hines with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Sincerely,
/s/ Matthew Mondanile
Matthew Mondanile
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
No. 90-6321.

#### Tribell *v.*Hatfield, Warden, et al.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Irradiation-Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking of Austenitic Stainless Steels and Alloy 690 from Halden Phase-II Irradiations (NUREG/CR-6965)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6965, (PDF - 22.6 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2007**Date Published:**September 2008

**Prepared by:** Y. Chen, O.K. Chopra, W.K. Soppet, N.L. Dietz Rago W.J. Shack

 Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439

A.S. Rao, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6388 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This work is an ongoing effort at Argonne National Laboratory on the mechanistic study of irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) in the core internals of light water reactors. Phase I1 in this effort focused on determining the influence of grain boundary engineering (GBE), alloying elements, and neutron dose on the IASCC susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels (SSs) and Alloy 690. Flat dog-bone specimens irradiated in the Halden boiling heavy water reactor to neutron doses of =2 displacements per atom (dpa) were subjected to slow strain rate tensile (SSKT) tests in high dissolved oxygen water at 28g°C. The areas of the fracture surfaces with brittle fracture morphology (intergranular and transgranular cleavage cracking) were measured with a scanning electron microscope. All materials showed significant irradiation hardening and loss of ductility. Some strain hardening was observed in the normal-Carbon (C) content SSs (Types 304 and 3 16) and Alloy 690, but not in the low-C content SSs (Types 304L and 316L). The area fraction of the intergranular cracking increased with decreasing uniform elongation and was used to rank the IASCC susceptibility of the alloys. The GBE process did not seem to have a significant effect on the IASCC behavior of Type 304 and 304L SSs, at least at a dose level of about =2 dpa, but did affect the cracking behavior of Alloy 690. A minimum-C content and a low-sulfur (S) content (<0.002 wt.%) may be required for IASCC resistance. By analysis of the results from the Halden Phase-I1 specimens along with previous results on Halden Phase-I specimens, the effect of neutron dose on IASCC behavior was determined. While irradiation hardening and embrittlement start below 0.4 dpa, IG cracking appears between 0.4 and 1.3 dpa for most commercial austenitic SSs in this study.

**Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**

This NUREG does not contain information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

**Public Protection Notification**

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a current valid OMB control number.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 24 15

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Sel ic a Ja ne Fen de r ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__
__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of No rth Dako ta - Farg o

__
__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Apri l 1 , 20 19 Fi le d: Apri l 2 3, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d GRAS Z, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Sel ic a Fen de r ap pe al s fro m th e se nt en ce th e Dis tri ct Co ur t 1 im po se d aft er sh e pl ead ed gu il ty to a d ru g o ffen se . Her co un se l h as m ov ed to wit hd raw an d h as fil ed a b rie f un de r And ers v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 (19 67 ).
Co un se l arg ue s th at th e Dis tri ct Co ur t erre d i n de nyin g sa fet y -v al ve rel ie f un de r 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (f). W e reject th is arg um en t be cau se we co nc lu de th at Fen de r fai le d to e s t a b l i s h t h a t sh e qu al ifi ed fo r th e rel ie f so ug ht

. See Uni te d St at es v. Gue rra- Cab rera , 47 7 F.3 d 10 21 , 1 02 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (s ta ti ng th at de fen da nt s mu s t es ta bl is h t ha t t he y

qu al ify for s afet y -v al ve rel ie f).
W e ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o , 4 88 U

. S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d we ha ve id en ti f i e d n o n on -fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

. W e gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d we a ffi rm .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

1 The Hon or ab le Don ov an W

. Fran k, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct J u d g e fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta , si tt in g b y de si gn at io n. -2

-
<PAGE>   1
                                        
               INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance
sheet of Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 31, 1997, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
operations for the three-month periods ended January 31, 1997 and February 2,
1996, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the
three-month periods ended January 31, 1997 and February 2, 1996. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year  with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
referred to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of November 1, 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the year then
ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated December 19, 1996, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of November 1, 1996, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                        ------------------------------

February 27, 1997
Woodland Hills, California
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (NUREG-1769)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1769	           - Cover - Chapter 2 (PDF - 12.7 MB)
          - Chapter 3: Page 3-1 - Page 3-200 (PDF - 14.7 MB)
          - Chapter 3: Page 3-201 - End (PDF - 9.94 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2003**Date Published:**March 2003

Division of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document is a safety evaluation report regarding the application to renew the operating licenses for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The application was filed by the Exelon Generation Company LLC, (Exelon) by letter dated July 2, 2001. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has reviewed the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, license renewal application for compliance with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants," and prepared this report to document its findings.

In its submittal of July 2, 2001, Exelon requested renewal of the Peach Bottom, Units 2 and 3, operating licenses (License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56, respectively), which were issued under Section 104b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, for a period of 20 years beyond the current license expiration dates of August 8, 2013, and July 2, 2014, respectively. The Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station is a two-unit nuclear power plant located in York County and Lancaster County in southeastern Pennsylvania. Each unit consists of a General Electric boiling-water reactor nuclear steam supply system designed to generate 3514 megawatts thermal or approximately 1116 megawatts electric.

The NRC license renewal project manager for Peach Bottom, Units 2 and 3, is David Solorio. Mr. Solorio may be contacted by calling 301-415-1973 or by writing to the License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                  TO BYLAWS OF

                            COVOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                  Pursuant  to  Unanimous  Consent  of the  Board  of  Directors
effective  May  20,  1997,  Article  2,  Section  8,  of  the  Bylaws  of  Covol
Technologies, Inc. is amended to read in its entirety, as follows:

                  Section  8.  Required  Vote.  The  vote  of the  holders  of a
         majority of the shares entitled to vote and represented at a meeting at
         which  a  quorum  is  present  shall  be the  act of the  Corporation's
         stockholders unless the question is one upon which by express provision
         of the statutes or the Certificate of Incorporation a different vote is
         required,  in which case such  provision  shall  govern and control the
         decision of such  question.  The vote  required for the election of the
         Directors  shall be by plurality of the votes of the shares  present in
         person or  represented  by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on
         the election of directors.
No. A-474.

#### Williams *v.*Faucett et al.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Application for stay, addressed to Justice O’Connor and referred to the Court, denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Operating Commercial Power Reactors and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update - Annual Report for Calendar Year 2021 (NUREG-1885, Revision 15)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 15 (PDF – 2.50 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2022**Date Published:** October 2022

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D.e of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210 d(e)), as amended, which states, "not less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year." Additionally, Section 170D.a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210 d(a)), as amended, grants the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) the authority to determine which licensed facilities must undergo these security evaluations. The NRC is reporting the security response evaluation results for the Nation’s fleet of operating commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) and Category I (CAT I) fuel cycle facilities, given the significance of the nature, form, and quantity of nuclear material at these facilities. With respect to NPPs, the scope of this report includes those undergoing decommissioning but not yet transitioned to a dry-storage independent spent fuel storage installation due to the continued implementation of Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* Part 73, “Physical Protection of Plants and Materials.” This report includes a comprehensive overview of the combined results of the security programs for calendar year (CY) 2021. To aid in understanding the context of how the NRC conducts evaluations, this report also provides a description of relevant security programs, including: Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), Security Baseline Inspection Program for NPPs, a force-on-force (FOF) evaluation description, and CAT I Fuel Cycle Facility Security Oversight Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 01, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gene W. Schneider, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: November 14, 2003 | /s/ Gene W. SchneiderGene W. Schneider Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50608 

__________________

KENNETH LEE JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALICE BENNER; DELPHIS BENOIT;

JACK M. GARNER, Warden; CHARLIE

F. STREETMAN, Assistant Warden;

FRANK WILLIAMS; GRACE E. KENNEDY

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CV-37

- - - - - - - - - -

November 17, 1995

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Lee Johnson requests leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court's dismissal,

under 28 U.S.C § 1915(d), of his civil rights complaint. IFP is

GRANTED. The portion of the district court's order dismissing

Johnson's claims which alleged violations of Due Process and the

Eighth Amendment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the
No. 95-50608

-2-

district court. However, the district court's Final Judgment is

VACATED and the matter REMANDED to allow the district court an

opportunity to address Johnson's allegation concerning a

violation of Equal Protection.

We add our caution to that of the district court; if

Johnson's equal-protection allegation is frivolous, he should

voluntarily dismiss the claim to avoid the possible imposition,

upon remand, of the sanctions the district court warned him about

previously.

IFP GRANTED; AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART;

SANCTIONS WARNING GIVEN.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Silverstar  Holdings,  Ltd. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Clive
Kabatznik,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  May 15, 2006



                                          /s/ Clive Kabatznik
                                          -----------------------
                                          Clive Kabatznik
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) PROMULGATED UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: December 20, 2005/s/ Todd ParkerTodd Parker
Co-Chief Executive Officer (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Co-Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
No. 91-458.

#### Riverside Market Limited Partnership et al. *v.*Prescott.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.