### State ofUtah
GARY It IlERBERT**G(J\~fflO"** GREG BEll.**L<rul~nani Go>'fWI~'** 

September21, 2010 

### Departmentof Environmental Quality

Amanda Smith Exet:u/fI'I'**DIN~CIO#'** DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Chel)'l Hcymg D,"t;for



### DAQP-020-10

Callie A. Vidctich. Director 

### Airand Radiation Program 

### US EPA Reg;on 8 1595 Wynkoop Street 

### Denver, Colorado 80202·1129

Dear Ms. Videtich:



### Re: Section t 

### 10 Plan to Supportthe 2006 PMl.5 NAAQS

Section 110(a)(1) ofthe C[can Air Act (CAA) requires that, within 3 years following the promulgation ofa National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), each state will submit a plan providing for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement ofsuch standard. The NAAQS for PM2.5 were signed on September 21,2006. Hence, these Section 110 plans were due to EPA 

### by Septemberof2009.

Thc most recent guidance! indicates that, in many cases, the section 110 plans to address the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS lllay already be adequate to implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS because many oCthe required section 110(<\)(1) and 11 0(a)(2) elements relate to the general information and authorities that constitute the "infrastructure" ofa state's airquality management program, and these clements have been in place to address particulate matter since the initial State Implementation Plans (SIPs) were submitted in response to the 1970 Clcan Air Act.

To that end, some background concerningthe Section 110 SIPand the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS may be 

### helpful.

In addressing the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, wherein PM2.5 was first introduced as the indicatoroffine particulate matter, Utah indicated, by letterofMarch 27, 1998, that it had reviewed its 110 SIP and believed that no revisions would be necessary to implement the revised particulate maner standards. Such assessment was consistent with what EPA had anticipated in its initial guidance, dated December 23, 1997.

I Guidancc on SIP Elements Required UnderSections II00aXI) and (2) forthe 2006 24·Hour Fine Particle (PMu ) National Ambienl Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); From WilliamT. Harnett, DirectorAir Quality Policy Division, OfficeofAir Quality Planning and Standards, To Regional Air Division Directors, Regions I-X; Dated September 25,2009 195 North t9SO Wesl· Salt l.aktClIy. UT Mai1ingAddn:ss: P.O. Box 144820' Salt LakeCitr. UT &4114-4820 Telephone: (801) 5364000' Fu (SOI)S36-4099' TD.D (SOl) SJ6-4414

........**Jeq.aII,~** P'nnkdon lOll"-. rtt)ded pIPCl"

### DAQP-020-IO Page 2
However, additional guidance (dated August 15, 2006 and October2, 2007) identified several issues that 

### would require special consideration. These were the interstate transport issues to be addressed under IIO(a)(2)(D)(i) and the emergency episode provisions ofsection II0(a)(2)(0). EPA indicated that, with respect to the latter, 

### it intended to initiate rulemaking in orderto provide the necessary numerical limits and 

### concentration levels for emergency episode action plans involving PM2.5.

In a letter dated December3,2007, Utah reiterated thatall the elements identified in the October 2, 2007, 

### guidance were addressed in its current SIP and were adequate to implementthe 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (as well as the 1997 8-hourozone NAAQS). Utah also indicated that it would take appropriate action to amend its cmergcncy episode plan as soon as thc EPA revised 40 eFR section 51.150 to establish priority classifications and establish a significant harm level for PM2.5.

Via e-mail ofMarch 3, 2008, EPA provided clarification concerning the information it would need in order to complete its review ofthe section 110 SIPs. The e-mail referenced EPA's earlier guidance ofAugust 15, 2006, and October2, 2007, and indicated lhat a certification ofSIP adequacy may be submitted where appropriate. Theemail requested that such stale certification include a completed PM2.5 criteria table, a draft ofwhich was attached. Additionally, it reiterated the following with respectto certain ofthe Section 110 requirements:

• It noted that, in addressing section II0(a)(2XD)(i), states were not rcquired to submit PSD and Nonauainment NSR program SIPs for PM2.5 until EPA had completed a revision ofthe federal regulations covering these programs, and

• Until EPA revised the Emergency Episode Plan and significant hann levels for PM2.5, it recommended that states rely on interim guidanceto satisfy the Section 110 (aX2XG) requirements.
In response to the e-mail, Utah sent another letter dated April 17,2008. Attached to the letter was a completed PM2.5 criteria table which provided a more detailed assessment ofhow Utah's SIP addressed each ofthe elemcnts identified in section 11 0(a)(2).

EPA did publish a finding in the federal register(sec FR Vol. 73, pp. 62902) that Utah's submittal was complete with respect to Section II0(a)(2.) However, the issue ofapproval was not addressed, and it is therefore somewhat more difficult to poinl to the adequacy ofthis SIP with respectto the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS as an indication ofits suitabilityto support the revised NAAQS of2006.
Nevertheless, as we evaluate each ofthe program elements described in CAA Section II0(a)(2), we are left to assume that the SIP Utah has in place is indeed adequate to support the 1997 NAAQS for particulate matter. Furthermore, and in keeping with EPA's mosl recent guidance, we will conclude that it is also adequateto administerthe PM2.5 NAAQS as revised in 2006. Generally speaking, this evaluation ofthe Section 110 elements is again provided in the (attached) PM2.5 criteria table. However, since some ofthese elements have been given special attent'ion in the most recent guidance from EPA, some additional discussion will 

### be provided herein:

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)

- prohibitingcmissions activity within Utah from contributing significantly to NAAQS nonattainment in any other State

There are actually two clauses to this element; one relating to impact on areas not attaining the NAAQS and the other addrcssing interference with efforts to maintain compliance with the

### DAQP-020-IO Page 3
NAAQS 

### in down·wind states. EPA is interpreting this second clause to include areas that are 

### meetingthe 2006 standard, not merely areas formerly designated nonattainmcnt that would be subject to a maintenance plan. The guidance suggests that states should explain whetheror not emissions from the state "have this impact."

Absent a pre-defined maintenance area with a SIP that quantifies how much impact is acceptable with regard to NAAQS protection, il is not entirely clear how ''this impact" differs from eithera NAAQS violation (first clause) arthe prevention ofsignificant deterioration (see below.) Thus, for the purpose ofthis exercise, Utah will look at the whole ofSection 110(a)(2)(0)(i)(I) to mean that emissions from Utah are neither causing norcontributing in a significant way to NAAQS violations in other states. Any such assessment to that end would need to 

### be supported by an adequate technical analysis. This much was anticipated in the guidance, which however was written at a time when the CAIR rule was still in a state oflitigation and uncertainty. Recalling that, with respect to the 1997 PM2.5 standard, the CAIR rule had itselfrelied upon such
a technical analysis to conclude that certain western states did not significantly cause or contribute to any NAAQS violations in down-wind states, these western states were encouraged to cite the CAIR analysis as evidencethat it was not necessary at that time to exercise the authority described in Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i.) Utah took this approach in a transport SIP for both PM2.5 and 8-hour
ozone. The SIP was submitted to EPA on March 28, 2007, and EPA proposed approval with an cffcctive date ofMay 27, 2008 (sec FR 73, No. 61, pp 16543).

TheCAIR analysis, however, did not address the 2006 standard for PM2.5. So, as in interim policy, this most recent guidance recommends that each ofthe states conduct its own regional analysis to detennine as much for their 110 SIP submittals.

On August 2, 2010, EPA proposed a new rule to replace the CAIR as a means to address interstate transport (see FR 75 No. 147, pp 45210). Again, there are certain western states that were found not to contribute in a significant way to any NAAQS violation, for either PM2.5 or 01.One, in the down-wind states. Utah is among those states. EPA's assessment regarding these western states is undoubtedly based on a regional scale technical analysis, and Utah will point to that analysis in orderto conclude thatthere are no current or future emissions from within its boundaries that eithercause or contribute in a significant way to NAAQS violations in any ofthe down-wind states.

• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(iXII)

- prohibiting emissions activity within Utah from interfering with the efforts ofany other State to Prevent Significant Deterioration ofits airquality or protect its visibility Again with this paragraph, there aretwo clauses which must be considered: PSD and visibility. Concerning PSD

- EPA believes this requirement is satisfied for PM2.5 ifa state's SIP includes preconstruction review programs for major sources that satisfy the requirements ofboth Nonattainment NSR and PSD (40 CFR 51.165(b)(I) and 51.166 respectively). All states are currently required to have some form ofpreconstruction permitting program for PM2.5, and as per the guidance, it is not necessaryto make any rulc rcvisions specifically for the purposc ofSection 110 unless the area has outstanding program deficiencies.

### DAQP-020-10 Page 4

Utah is currently operating underthe PM I0 surrogate policy for the PSD program, as outlined in the 1997 EPA memorandum entitled "Interim Implementation ofNew Source Review Requirements for PM2.5." Utah intends to incorporate PM2.S into the PSD program 

### by May 2011,
as required by the May 16, 2008, PM2.5 Implementation Rule for PM2.5 NSR. We anticipate that EPA will have established certain requirements, such as PM2.5 increments and Significant Impact Levels, and sUlck testing requirements that need to 

### be in place before PM2.5 can be adequately addressed in the PSD program. Utah is currently operating underthe provisions ofAppendix S for 

### PM2.5 

### nonattainment areas. Concerning visibility

- According to the guidance, EPA believes this requirement can be satisfied by an approved SIP addressing reasonably attributable visibility impairment (RAVI), ifrequired, and an approved SIP addressing regional haze.

EPA is not aware ofany certification by a Federal Land Managerofexisting RAVI that remains unaddressed by a currently approved SIP or FIP. Accordingly, any state for which EPA has approved into its current SIP some or all RAVI elements may satisfy this element with a verification that no source within its boundaries emits pollutants that interfere with RAVI measures included in the applicable implementation plan ofany other state.

Utah's SIP does in fact address RAVI, and a statement verifying that there are no Utah sources of emissions that interfere with implementation ofRAYI SIPs in other states appears within SIP Section XXIII (Interstate Transport) and was approved by EPA on March 28, 2008.

SIP Section XXIIl also addresses regional haze with the following statement: "Because Utah submitted its first Regional Haze SIP to EPA in December2003 under40 CFR 5 I.309, Utah has already demonstrated reasonable progress in reducing impacts on Class Iareas on the Colorado Plateau. The [forthcoming] 2007 SIP update will analyze any impacts from Utah that extend beyond the Colorado Plateau and determine appropriate long-term strategies for control measures."

Utah submitted this forthcoming regional haze SIP to EPA on September9,2008. It includes several things that are pertinent to particulate matter, including an enhanced smoke management program as well as an Assessment ofNeed for (NOx and) PM milestones. This evaluation was based on an assessment ofstationary source emissions ofNOX and PM made by the WRAP Market Trading Forum for all WRAP states, including the transport region states. The 2008 SIP also addresses the Best Available RetrofitTechnology requirement for PM.

The September 25, 2009, guidance notes that, States intending to rely on a required regional haze SIP to satisfy this element ofthe Section 110 SIP, which had not fonnally indicated as much in a SIP submission or have not submitted a haze SIP, may receive an additional finding offailure to submit on this count. Furthermore, it indicates that EPA will be able to fully approve the Section 110 submittal as satisfying Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only after it has taken final action approving the regional haze SIP.

Utah did submit its haze SIP and did announce its intention to rely on that SIP to satisfy the Section 110 element. We would therefore, atthis point, reiterate this intention as well as point out the following: a) Utah has an approved transport SIP for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, b) the 2006 revision to the PM NAAQS only serves to make emissions ofPM2.5 more restrictive. It follows that Utah's ability to rectify visibility impairment in a down·wind State would not, thereby, be compromised, and c) the technical assessments made in Utah's regional haze SIP still reflect the

### DAQP-020-10 Page 5

fact that PM emissions from stationary sources have a small impacton visibility compared to S02 emissions and smoke from fire.

• Section IIO(a)(2)(G)

- providing authority to address activities causing imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, including contingency plans to implement emergency episode provisions



### As discussed above, Utah had previously indicated that 

### it would amend its emergency episode plan
as soon as 

### EPA revised its own rules to establish priority classifications and a significant harm level for PM2.5. To date, the EPA has still not revised its rules, but the September25,2009, guidance includes (as attachment B) a table ofthe Recommended Interim Significant Harm Level, Priority Levels, and Action Levels for PM2.5 Emergency Episode Plans. The guidance recommends that States set the priorit)' levels and emergency action levels for PM2.5 necessary to develop emergency episode plans, and that they considerthe levels (including a significant harm level) identified in Attachment B. Using these recommended levels, States would develop emergencyepisode plans for any area that has monitored and recorded 24·hour PM2.5 levels greater than 140.4 glm3 since 2006. Ifthis level was neverexceeded in any area ofthe State, it could certifythat it has the authority to address such episodes but that no specific plans are necessary atthis time. It also asserts that the levels identified in Attachment B are suitable for both the 1997 and the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Monitoring data in Utah demonstrates that the 140.4 

### glm3 has never been exceeded; therefore, ourcertification herein that we have the authority to address such episodes, should they occur, should meet EPA's requirement for Section 11O(aX2)(G.)

Should you need any further information in this regard, please contact Bill Reiss ofmy staffat (80I) 536- 

### 4077.
Sincerely,

M. Cheryll-leying, MCH/BRIcy

Attachment

### SIP Submilled by: Dale Submilled: Subject: SIP SUBMITTAL**CO~IPLETENESS** 

### CRITERIA CHECKLIST

Conlirmation of**llO(a)(2)(AH:~O** 

### PM2.5 

### NAAQS Itc<luircmenls in the SII)


### 110(a)(2)(A)-(M) Requirements Checklist Seclion 110 a) clemenl Summao' ofelement I-1o\\' Addressed in Stale 511" Where codilicd/ll ) )I"cH'cd by EI'A § J

### 1O(a)(2)(A) 

### il/clude enforceable emission SfP Section I (LegalAUI/lOrity).A.I,a. 

### Codiried at R307-110-21 EPA limitations andotherconfro/measures, allows adoption of Standards and limits for approved this SIP originally in the meanS, or

### techniques (inellldillg 

### attainment and 

### maintainCllce ofnational early 1980's and most rcccl11ly on JUlle 

### economic il/eel/lil'es 

### such asfees, 

### Standards.**(19-2-IO~** 

### and 109. Ulah Code 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744. marketablepermits, and allcl;OIlS

### of 

### Annotated 1953 (UCA) ) 

### emi.\·s;olls rights), 

### as well 

### as schedules 

### (l/ul timetables/orcompli(/Ilce as may he lIe£:essary

### orappropriate TO 

### meet rile (If)/Jlicahle real/ireme1lfs of Til

### is Act. §J 

### 10(11)(2)(8) providefor establishmem al/{I 

### SIP Section IV 

### (AII/bientAi,. MOl/itoring Codified at R307-1 

### 10-51 EPA 

### opermioll oJappropriate devices. Program) provides a brierdescription of the ;'Ipprovcd this 

### SIP originully in the 

### methods, systems, a"dprocedures 

### purposes ofthe air monitoring program. 

### C,Jrly 1980's ;]nd most recently on June 

### neees,wry to 11/o"itor. compile. alld 

### 25.2003 ,It 

### 68 FR 37744. (II/llly:e data 011 

### ambientairquality. {f1U/lIpon request, 

### make slich data {l\'ailable to 

### tileAdministrator;



### Page Ior9, C:IDOCUME-JlCOURTN-IILOCALS-lITemplXPgrpwiseIR8 110 CriteriaTable for PM25.doc

### §llO(a)(2)(C) il/clude aprogram fa

### providefor the

- SIP Section 

### J (LegalAl/fhoriry).A.I.b. 

### Codified at R307-11O-2/EPA enforcement of ,liemeasures described allows for enforcement ofapplicable laws, approved this 

### Sfroriginally in the ill 

### subparagraph (A) alld

### regulation of 

### regulations and standards and seek early 1980's and most recently on June 

### rhe modification alld COIIstrllctioll 

### of injunctive relief. (Sections 19-2-104 and 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744. anystationarysOl/ree 

### within file areas 

### 19-2-[ 15. VCA) 

### covered byrhe

### plan as necessary to
assure '''(Ill/ariona! alllbielltai,.

- S[P Section I(LegalAlltllOrity).A.l.d, quality standards (lre achieved, provides authority to prevent construction. 

### iI/eluding (l

### permil

### program as modification oroperntion ofany stationary required ill

### parts 

### C alldD; source <It 

### any localion where emissions from such source will prevent the atlainmenl or maintenance ofa national standard or interfere with prevention of significant deterioration requirements. (Authority Utah Code Section**19~2-108)** 

### §IlO(a)(2)(D) cOl/tain adequ(l{eprovisiolls- SIP Section XXIll (IlI1erstate Transport) Codified at R307-110-36/This SlP (i)prohibirillg, consistellt with the This 

## srp was wriltento satisfy the was submilled to EPA on March 28, provisions of this tirle, any source or requirements ofsection IIO(a)(2)(D)(i) of 2007, and EPA proposed the approve othertype of emissiolls aClivity will/in the clean air act for the new NAAQS for ofthis subrniual on March 28, 2008 al the stalefrom emifling any air PM2.5 and 8-hourozone were promulgated 73 FR 16543. which wiII go into polllltant ill amoullts which will-- in 1997. effect on May 27,2008. (I) COlltribllre sigl1ificall1ly 10 llOlWtlailllllell1 ill, 

### orilltel/ere with !1laimellallce by, allYolherstate with respect to allYsuch lIationalprimary
orsecondary ambiellt airqllality standard, or (II) illtelJere with measures requiredto be inc/lldedill 

### the applicable implementationplanfor (lily OllieI'State ullderpart 

### C10prevell1 significall1 deterioration of airqllality
orto/)rotect visibilit '.

Page 2 of9, C:\DOCUME-l\COURTN-l\LOCALS-l\Temp\XPgrpwise\R8 110 CJiteriaTable for PM25.doc

### (ii) iI/suring compliance with the applicable reqllirelllellts of sections 126

### and 

### 115 (relating to interstate and illtematio/lalpolll/tion abatement); 

### §110(.)(2)(E)(i) provide SIP 

### Section V(Resources) 

### provides the Codified al R307-110-6! EPA (i) 

### 11ecessaryassl/rances that the 

### Division ofAir Quality commits to program approved this SIP originally in the state (or, except where the 

### activities in relation to resources provided early 1980's and most recently on June Administratordee/wi inappropriate, by 

### the annual StatefEPA Agreement and 25,2003 al 68 FR 37744. thegel/eralpllrpose local govemllle1l1 

### 105 grant applications. The StatefEPA
orgovernments, ora regionalagency 

### Agreement and 105 grant applications. designatedby the state orgeneral plflpose local governmentsforsl/ch purpose) willhave adequatepersonnel, jimdil/g, al/dallthority Ilnderstate (and, as appropriate. local) law to carry ow s/lch implemelltatiollplall (and is I/Otprohibitedby allYprovision of

federal orstate lawfrom carrying alitsuch implementationplan or portioll thereon; 

### §ltO(.)(2)(E)(ii) (ii) 

### requirements thatthe state comply 

### SIP Section I(LegalAllt/lOrity).A.l.g., 

### Codified al R307-110-2! EPA with the requirements respecti/lg state 

### recognizes the requirement that the State approved this SIP originally in the boards 1lIidersection 

### 128, and 

### comply with provisions ofthe Clean Air early 1980's and most recently on June Act (Section (28) respecting State Boards. 25,2003 al 68 FR**377~4.** 

### (Seclio.s 19-2-104 UCA )

Page 3 of9, C:\DOCUME-IICOURTN-IILOCALS-IITemplXPgrpwiselR8 110 Crite,;aTable for PM25.doc

### §110(a)(2)(E)(iii) (iii) 

### necessaryassurances t!Jat, where Section 41-6<1-1642 provides the counties 

### Codified at R307-110-31!EPA 

### the swre has relied 011 

### a local or the authority to run their own emissions 

### approved this SIP section on regiol/algovemmel1t, agellcy, or 

### inspection and maintenance program. and November 2, 2005 at 70 FR 6626-1.. 

### illsrrlllllellralityfor 

### the implementation Subsection 41-6a-1642 (2) (b)(i) requires Codified at R307-32/ EPA apprO\ed 

### of allYphlllprovisioll, the state has the counties emissions inspection and this SlPsection on July 17. 1997 at 62 

### respollsibilityfor ensllring adequate maintenance program to be 

### made to 

### i.lllain FR38213. implcI1Ie1l1aTioll o/slIchplallprovision; 

### or maintain ambient air quality standards in 

### Codified at R307-33/ EPA approved the county, consistent with the state this SrP section on August 1.2005 at implcmentation plan and federal 70 FR 44055. requirements. Section X ofthe SIP outlines Codified <It R307-34/ EPA <lpprovcd the specific requirements ofthe automotive this SlP section on November 2, 2005 inspection and mainlenance program. at 70 FR 66264. Codified al R307-3S/ EPA approved this SIP section on September 14. 2005 at 70 FR 54267.
§110(a)(2)(F) 

### require. as may beprescribedby tlie

- SIP Section 1

### (LegalAlftliority).A.IJ.,

- Codified at 

### R307-110-2! EPA 

### Adlll;nistrator- requires owners oroperators ofstalionary approved this SIP originally in the (i) 

### the illStallation, mai1l1ellallce, Wid sources to install, maintain and lise early 1980's and most recently on June 

### replacemellt of eqltipme1I1, andtlie emission monitoring devices: and to make 25,2003 at 68 FR 37744. 

### implemelltatioll of otliernecessary periodic reports to the State Depattment of 

### steps by oWllers oroperators of Environmental Quality on the nature and 

### statiol/ary sources to monitor amounts ofemissions from such sources. 

### emissions/rom such SOl/rces, The State Department ofEnvironmental



### (ii)periodic reports 0/1 the 1/ature Quality will makc such data available to the 

### and**alllol/llf.~** 

### of emissions w/(I 

### public as reported and as cOITeiated with 

### emissions-relateddatafrom sitch any applicable emission standards or


### sources. and limitations. (Sections 19-2-104, UCA)



### (iii) correlation o/sHch reports by the state agellcy with any emission -SIP Section []] 

### (Sol/rce Surveillallce)

- Codified at R307-11O-4! EPA 

### limitations orstandards established includes inventory requirements, stack approved this 

## srp originally in the 

### p"rsua1l1to thisAct. which reports testing, and plant inspections (Sections 19- early 1980's and most recently on June 

### shall be available at reasonable times 2-107 and 19-2-108, UCA. allow insnection 25,2003 at 68 FR 37744.

Page 4 of9, C:\DOCUME-IICOURTN-IILOCALS-IITemplXPgrpwiseIR8 110 CtiteriaTable for PM25.doc

### forDubUc illsDec:rioll; ofair Dollution sourccs) 

### § II O(a)(2)(G) 

### provideJaraltthority comparable to SIP Section I

### (LegalAlItllOr;ty).A.I.c,



### -Codified'" R307-110-2/ EPA that ill sectioll 303 andadequate provides authority to abate pollutunt approved this SIP originall) in lhe 

### comillgencyplans to implell/em sitch emissions on an cmcrgcncy busis to early 1980's and most rccently on June 

### awllOrity: prevent substantial cndangerment to 

### the 

### 25.2003 a' 68 FR 37744. health ofpersons. (Section 19-2-112. UCA)

- More dewils ill 

### cun be found in SIP



### - Codified a' R307-110-8/ EPA Section VII 

### (Prel'elltioll ojAirPollutioll approved this SIP originally in the 

### Emergency Episodes) (Section 19-2-112. early 1980's and most recently on Junc 

### UCA). AFebmary 12.2007 OAQPS Issue 25.2003 a' 68 FR 37744. Paper indicuted thaI EPA will be iSSUIng a significant harm level rulc for PM2.5. Ut

.. lh will address thc requircmcnts of 110 

### (a)(2)(G) afterEPA oromul.a'es this rule. § II O(a)(2)(I-I) 

### providefor revision of s/lchplall- SrP Section I 

### (LegalAlltllOr;ty).A.I.a., 

### Codified a' R307-11O-2/ EPA (i)

### from time to 

### time as may be provides the ability for 

### UDAQ to revises its "Ipproved this SIP oliginally in lhe 

### lIe£:essary to take accountof plans lo Hike aCCount ofrevisions of early 1980's and most recently on June 

### rev;s;ons of sitch IUltionalprimary or national ambient airquality slUndard and to 

### 25. 2003 a' 68 FR 37744. sec01ulmyambiem airqllality adopt ex.peditiolls methods ofalt:.tining and 

### stCllulardorthe availability of maintaining such standard. 

### ;mprOl'edormore expeditious methods of auaill;ng slich standard. alld

(ij) 

### excepr asprovided;11 paragraph (3)(C), 

### whenevertile Adllli"istratorjillds on the basis of ;lIformation al'{lilable to the Administratorthatthephl1l is substalltially ;/ladequate to arrain the IUltional ambiellr airquality standard which it implements, orto othenvi!ie comply with any addit;onal reau;rements established


### Page 5 or9, C:IDOCUME-IICOURTN-IILOCALS-IITemplXPgrpwise\R8 110 CriteriaTable for PM25.doc

### I/nder litis ACI; 

### § 110(:1)(2)(1) in lite case of aplan orplallrevision 

### SIP Section I (iRgalAut/lOrily).A.I.a. 

### Codified at R307-110-2/ EPA for (l// 

### area designaledas a 

### adopts measures to allainment and upprovcd this SIP original!) in the Ilo"alfainmenlarea. 

### meet the maintenance of national standards. curly 1980's and most recently 011 

### June applicable requirements of part D 

### SIP Section I (iRgalAI/I/wrily).A.I.b: 

### 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744. (relalillflto llOIUlifainllle1llareas); 

### Construction I>crmits of Pm1 D 

### §JJO(1l)(2)(J) meelthe applicable requiremenls of



### - SIP Section I (LegalAmhorily).A.2: 

### Codified at R307-110-2/ EPA (§ 121 section 121 (relating to 

### consultatio1l). 

### adopts requirements for transpol1ution approved this SIP originally in the consultation}



### ... consuhation(Section 174, Clean Air Act) early 1980's and most recently on June 

### 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744.
Codified at R307-110-7/ EPA

. SIP Section VI (llltergol'enll//{!/ital 

### approved this SIP originally in {he Cooperatioll}. 

### provides a brief listing of early 1980's and Illost recently on June federal. state, and local agencies involved in 

### 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744. protecting 

### airquality in Utah. 

### Codified at R307-110-20/ EPA upproved SIP Section XII IIII'o/l'emell1. 

### but it hus been -SIP Section XII (Tr{l//:iportalion 

### superseded by 

### SIP Scclion XII Conformity COJ/\'lIltalion). 

### establishes the TrwlSporlarion COllformity 

### consullulion procedures on tntllSporti.llion COlI.'wltatiOlI. 

### which was submillcd to 

### conformity issues when prepi.lring state EPA on June 26. 2007. but EPA has plans. nol approved Ihis SIP.



### §110(:1)(2)(,1) meet the applicable requirements of 

### SlP Section XVI (Public Notification) 

### Codified at R307-110-24/ EPA (Section 127 public se(:tioll 

### 127of this title (relati1lg 

### to adopts the requinnents 10 notify the public approved this SIP originally in the notificnlion) public notification) 

### when NAAQS have been exceeded as per early 1980's and most recently on June section 127. 

### 25,2003 at 68 FR 37744.

Page 6 of9, C:IDOCUME-IlCOURTN-IILOCALS-IlTempIXPgrpwiseIR8 110CriteriaTable for PM25.doc

### §11O(0)(2)(J) 

### lIIeel111e applicable 

### reqllireme1l1s of

... -SIP Section VIII (PSD) 

### describes the

- Codified ," R307-11 0-9/EPA 

### O'8D) pari 

### C (refatillg 

### to pre\lelltioll

### of program 10 

### prevent signi neallt 

### deterioration 

### approved SIP Section VIII 

### PSD. but it 

### sigllijic.YUlt deterioration 

### of airquality ofareas ofthe stilte where Ihe niris clean. 

### hus been Upcl'llCd <lncl superseded 

### by a (lml visibilityprotection); new 

### SIP Section VIII PSD. 

### which was subrnitlcd 10 EPA on September 15. 

### 2006.

-SIP Section XVII 

### (Visibility Protectioll)

- Codified at R307-11O-25/ EPA describes the program to prolect visibility. approved this SIP in April 1997 and 

### especially within the boundaries ofthe five most recently on June 25. 2003 al 

### 68 national parks located ill 

### Utah. (Sections FR 37744. 19-2-101 and 104, UCA)



### §IIO(1l)(2)(K) 

### providefor: SIP Section II 

### (Review of New allliModified Codified at 

### R307-110-3/ EPA (i) 

### theperfomulIlce of such air AirPolJlllio/l Sources). provides for new or upproved this SIP originally in the 

### quality modeling as theAdministrator modified sources ofair pollution must e:'lrly 1980's and most recently on June 

### mayprescribefor thepurpose of submit plans to the Division of Air Quality 

### 25.2003 at 68 FR 37744. 

### prellictillg the effect 011 

### ambiem air and receive an Approval Order before 

### quality of allYemissions of allYair operating. (Section 19-2-104, UCA) 

### pOI/Hllllltfor which theAdministrator hWi establishedallati011l11 ambientair qilaliry :i·tlllu/ard, {l/u/

(ii) rhe sllbmission. upon relJllesr, of dalll relmed10sllch airquality mode/illM fa 

### theAdministrator;

Page 7 of9, C:IDOCUME-IICOURTN-IILOCALS-IITempIXPgrpwiselR8 I 10 CriteriaTable for PM25.doc

### §110(a)(2)(L) 

### require the owneroroperatorof each SfP Section I (LegalAlllJlOr;ry).A.I.h: 

### Codified at R307-11O-2! EPA majorsTationarysource TO pay TO rhe 

### autholizes a fcc to major sources to cover approved this SIP originally in the permitting ((//fhorff)', as a conditioll

### of 

### permit and enforcement expenses. early 1980's and maSl recenlly on June allYpermit required/tllder 'hisAct, a 

### 25,2003 at 68 FR 37744. 

### fee sufficient 10

### cover- (i) lhe 

### reasollable COSfS 

### of reviewing 

### alldacting lipon allYapplicatiollfor stich apermit, alld

(if) 

## ifthe owneroroperatorreceives
apemlit for SlIch source, the 

### reasonable costs ofimplemelltillg 

### alld enforcillg rhe 

### terms {jlldCOI/eli/iolls of (Illysuch permif(/lot il/cluding allY COllrt costs oroIliercosts 

### associated wilh allY

### enforcementactioll), /fIllil slIcllfee requiremellfis superseded witll respect to such sources by the Admillistrator's approval of afee 

# I**pro~ralll** 

### I1llder title V; 

### §IlO(a)(2)(M) providefor collsllltarion alld 

### SIP Section VI (Il1tergovemmellwl 

### Codified at R307-110-7! EPA participation by localpolitical Cooperatioll) 

### lists federal. state, and local approved this SIP originally in the subdivisions affectedby theplall. 

### agencies involved in protecting airquality early 1980's and most recently on June in Utah. 

### 25,2003 at 68 FR 37744.

SIP Section XII (Transportatioll 

### Codified at R307-110-20! EPA COllformity Consulratioll) 

### establishes the approved SIP Section Xl] consultation procedures on transpol1i1tion Illvolvemellt! 

### but it has been conformity issues when preparing state superseded by SIP Section XII lolans. Tnf1/SDortation COllformit\'



### Page 8 of9, C:\DOCUME-IICOURTN-1\LOCALS-IITempIXPgrpwiseIR8 110 Criteria Table for PM25.doc§§110(a)(2)(C) 

### & lO(a)(2)(.I) 

### Pan C Permit program: §110(a)(2)(J) meet the applicable requirements of

... part 

### C (relatillg to prevention of sigllificantdeterioratioll of airquality andvisibilityprotection); 

### §//0(0)(2)(C)

... reglliarioll of the modificatioll alldcOllstntctioll of allY statiol/ary source wirhin the areas coveredby theplan as necessary to
assure thatnationalambient air quality sf{lIIdard:i are achieved. includillg apermitprogram as required

### illparts 

### CandD;



### 40 CFR 51.166: AmelldP5D regulations as requiredby the November 29, 

### 2005filial rule (70 FR 

### 7/6/2ar7/699-7/700).5eeoI5070 FR 7/67/-71684. - SfP Section I(LegalAlltJlOrity).A.I.d.: provides authority to prevent construction. modification oroperation ofany stationary
source at any location where emissions from Stich source will prevent the attainment or maintenance ofa national standard or interfere with prevention of significant deterioration requirements. (AuthOlity Utah Code Section 19-2-108)

- SIP Section

## vm (PSD), 

### describes the program to prevent significant deterioration ofareas ofthe stale where the air is clean.



## -srp Section XVII (Visibility Protection) describes the program to protect visibility, especially within the boundaries ofthe five national parks located in Utah. (Sections 

### 19-2-101 and 104, UCA) COllsulTation. which was submitted to EPA on June 26. 2007, but EPA has not approved this SIP.



### - Codified al 

### R307-110-2/ EPA approved this SIP oliglllally in the early 1980's and most recently on June 

### 25,2003 at 

### 68 FR 37744.

- Codified at R307-11O-91 EPA approved SIP Section Vill PSD, 

### but It 

### has been updated and superseded by a new SW Section VITI PSD. 

### whIch was submilled to EPA on September 15. 

### 2006.

- Codified at R307-110-25/ EPA approved this SIP in April 1997 and most recently on June 25,2003 at 68 

### FR 37744.

Page 9 of9, C:\DOCUME-IICOURTN-IILOCALS-I\Temp\XPgrpwise\R8 110 CriteriaTable for PM25.doc