alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Peer Review of GSI-191 Chemical Effects Research Program (NUREG-1861)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1861 (PDF - 12.8 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2006**Date Published:**December 2006 

**Prepared by**: P.A. Torres, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Fuel, Engineering and Radiological Research  Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), has a policy of initiating formal peer reviews for research programs that are on the cutting-edge of technology and will influence important regulatory decisions. Such is the case for the series of research projects that RES has sponsored to (1) resolve Generic Safety Issue 191, "Assessment of Debris Accumulation on PWR Sump Performance," and (2) inform the NRC's regulatory decisions regarding the potential for chemical byproducts to clog sump screens in the post-loss-of-coolant accident environment in pressurized-water reactors (PWRs).

This NUREG-series report describes the chemical effects peer review assessment process and summarizes its significant findings. It is important to mention that this peer review is not a consensus review. Each reviewer was asked to provide an individual evaluation based on his or her particular area of expertise. The research projects addressed by the peer review included integrated chemical effects testing (ICET) and ICET followup testing and analysis conducted at Los Alamos National Laboratory, chemical speciation prediction conducted through the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses at Southwest Research Institute, and accelerated chemical effects head loss testing conducted at Argonne National Laboratory. The chemical effects peer review evaluated the technical adequacy and uncertainty associated with the RES-sponsored research results, and identified outstanding chemical effects issues. The results of this peer review will support NRC staff audits and evaluations of industry responses to Generic Letter 2004-02, "Potential Impact of Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors." The final assessment reports from the peer reviewers are included as appendices to this NUREG-series report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Richard N. SUNDERLAND, Administrator of the Estate of Sherman E. Sun-derland, Deceased, Appellee, v. The PITTSBURGH & LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 14963.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 21, 1965.

Decided March 17, 1965.

*961Gilbert J. Helwig, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Frank J. Kernan, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Edwin Ellis, P. J. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the first appeal in this litigation we held it presented questions of fact which should have been presented to the jury. At the second trial the court concluded that the issue on negligence was for the jury. The latter decided in favor of the plaintiff.

Both the merits and damages were argued carefully and precisely on behalf of appellant. The testimony tending to show the proximate fault of the railroad was sparse but under it the court was justified in its conclusion that it presented a factual issue.

Appellant argues strongly that the son’s testimony regarding the family services of the father was hearsay. We do not think that the trial judge erred in holding that it was based on first-hand knowledge.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
#### Will of Saveland.

*January 13*

February *8, 1921.*

*Appeal and error: Affirmance by divided court.*

Where the justices of the supreme court are equally divided in opinion on the question involved on an appeal, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Gustave G. Gehrz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Simmons & Walker*of Racine, and oral argument by *John B. Simmons.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Lawrence A. Olwell,*attorney, and *dwell, Durant & Brady,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee; and the cause was argued orally by *Lawrence A. dwell.*

Eschweiler, J.

The judgment of the court below affirmed a judgment of the Milwaukee county court construing certain provisions of a will.

Upon the hearing here Mr. Justice Kerwin did not participate. Mr. Justice Vinje, Mr. Justice Rosenberry, and *329Mr. Justice Jones are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed; Mr. Chief Justice Siebecker, Mr. Justice Owen, arid the writer that it should be reversed. Under the rule it must therefore be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject - FY 2006

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2531

JAMES F. LAPINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY; KOONS OF TYSONS CORNER, INCORPORATED; GREGORY D. MEADOWS; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-759-A) Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: April 7, 1999 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James F. Lapinski, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Anthony Horvath, TRICHILO, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HORVATH & JUDKINS, Fairfax, Virginia; Anthony Eugene Grimaldi, MARTELL, DONNELLY, GRIMALDI & GALLAGHER, P.A., Fairfax, Virginia; Barry Dorans, WOLCOTT, RIVERS, WHEARY, BASNIGHT & KELLY, P.C., Virginia Beach, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:James F. Lapinski appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his claim alleging breach of contract, negligence, intentional misconduct, failure to honor warranties, fraud, bad faith, and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West1984 & Supp. 1998). The court dismissed Lapinski’s complaint without prejudice based on lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1998). Although the order did not address whether the court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1994), a review of Lapinski’s complaint reveals that it fails to allege a federal cause of action. See Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co. , 473 U.S. 479, 496 (1985). “[A] plaintiff may not appeal the dismissal of his complaint without prejudice unless the grounds for dismissal clearly indicate that ‘no amendment [in the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Because an allegation of appropriate facts could cure the defects in Lapinski’s complaint for which it was dismissed, we dismiss his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 64838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26033]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
sixteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 15, 2012 from 9:00 a.m.-4:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW., 
Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

November 15, 2012

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
     Review/Approve Summary of Fifteenth Meeting
     Updates from TSA (as required)
     Section Reports
     Times and Place of Next Meeting
     Other Business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 15, 2012.
Kathy Hitt,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-26033 Filed 10-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131782 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131782 

 COA: 267062 

Kent CC: 02-002860-FC 

JACOB STAR MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: FOIA

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - FOIA Records
                  - FOIA Web Pages

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - FOIA

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Australian Officials Reaffirm Strong Alliance

By  xxxDAVID VERGUNDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DEANNA KEENE,

Petitioner

v.

PAUL B. KIRSCH, M.D. AND

FOSTERBROOK MEDICAL

ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 215 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of November, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
HomeRadioactive WasteStorage of Spent Nuclear FuelConsolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF)Holtec International – HI-STORE CISF

# Application Documents for Holtec HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) considers public involvement in, and information about, our activities to be a cornerstone of strong, fair regulation of the nuclear industry. As such, the NRC believes that nuclear regulation should be transacted as openly and candidly as possible to maintain and enhance the public's confidence. Ensuring appropriate openness explicitly recognizes that the public must be informed about, and have a reasonable opportunity to participate meaningfully in, the NRC's regulatory processes. Toward that end, this page provides access to documents and correspondence related to the application that Holtec International submitted to obtain a license for an away-from-reactor consolidated interim spent fuel storage facility:

The following table provides links to the publicly available CIS application documents submitted by Holtec:

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 02, 2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested                           ( print page 5533)                        persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 26, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

                    1.                     *Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Mount Pleasant, Texas; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of DCB Financial Corp., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Preston State Bank, both in Dallas, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 28, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-01902 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryTraining Courses

# Agreement State Training

The NRC provides funding to the Agreement States for training and the associated travel. Information and forms needed for participation in the training program is provided below.

## Course List, Schedule, and Descriptions

        - FY 2024 Course List with Application Due Dates (02/22/2024)
        - NRC Course Descriptions (04/04/2023)
        - Instructions for On-line Courses
        - Hosting Application
        - Agreement State, State Delivery Application
        - NRC-Sponsored Training Application Form for Agreement States (05/26/2023)
        - NRC-Sponsored Training Application Form For MML Personnel (05/26/2023)

## Resources

        - HP Instrument Quality Assurance and Quality Control
        - GM Pancake Detectors
        - Size of Beam
        - Sodium Iodide Detectors
        - Introduction to Energy-Compensated Geiger-Mueller (ECGM) Detectors

####   Training Session Presentations (PDF)

        - Performance Based Inspection (12/05/2013)
        - Medical Webinar Training Series: Insights on Identifying Medical Events during Inspections Notes Pages (12/02/2014)
        - Medical Webinar Training Series: Update on Inspection Procedure 87132 for Brachytherapy Programs (03/26/2015)
        - Medical Webinar Training Series: Medical User Authorizations For Use of Materials under 10 CFR 35.300 (11/05/2015) 
        - Medical Webinar Training Series: Brachytherapy Medical Events/Reporting – Y-90 Microsphere and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (04/04/2017)

## Policy for Agreement State Training Assistance

        - SA-600: Process and Criteria for Agreement State Personnel to Attend NRC-Sponsored Training

Training and Travel Contact:Karen Meyer, Phone (301) 415-0113, Astrainingandtravel.Resource@nrc.gov

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, February 23, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement State Training
          - Fuel Cycle Processes Seminar 

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, February 23, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     9420216
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1406575
<ALLOWANCES>                                227749
<INVENTORY>                                1354886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12065676
<PP&E>                                     1624454
<DEPRECIATION>                              730062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            15731445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3945803
<BONDS>                                    8000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     10941
<OTHER-SE>                                18700863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              15371445
<SALES>                                    2292851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2292851
<CGS>                                      1153910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1153910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           7668723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          398860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6928642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (6931342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (6931342)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.65)


</TABLE>