alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Application of a Hydrological Uncertainty Methodology to Nuclear Reactor Site Evaluations (NUREG/CR-7211)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7211 (PDF – 16.74 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2013**Date Published:** August 2016

**Prepared by:** P.D. Meyer and C.D. Johnson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

R.E. Cady, NRC Program Manager

NRC Job Code Number V6068

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A variety of surface water and groundwater models are often used in the review of applications for new nuclear commercial power reactors. These models are used to evaluate current site hydrology and to provide estimates of future site conditions after facility construction has been completed. Predicted site conditions such as maximum flood and groundwater elevations may be compared to reactor design criteria. The current review guidance emphasizes a conservative approach to hydrologic modeling. The limitations of this approach become apparent when predicted site conditions exceed a design criterion, or when the margin between the two is small. A simple groundwater transport modeling example illustrates how uncertainty concepts can be used to inform regulatory decisions under these conditions. An uncertainty analysis methodology that can be used to estimate the joint impact of parameter, conceptual model, and scenario uncertainties is described, along with available software tools that can be used in a practical implementation of this methodology. The uncertainty methodology is illustrated using an example of reviewing groundwater site characteristics as part of a safety evaluation for a new power reactor. The example uses publicly available information from the Bellefonte Nuclear Station Units 3 and 4 Combined License application. A detailed description of model development is included to illustrate typical modeling decisions that arise in actual reviews. Modeling and uncertainty analyses were carried out using the Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) software, PEST, UCODE, and custom spreadsheets. The example illustrates that following standard procedures for uncertainty analyses can reveal limitations of the hydrologic analyses, e.g., unexamined parameter correlations and outstanding data needs, and results in more consistent reviews. Explicit consideration of alternative models is likely more valuable than quantitative model averaging. However, model averages using linear uncertainty methods can be easily completed and should be considered. Simple approaches to uncertainty evaluation can have great value, contributing to estimates of the degree of conservatism in the analysis demonstrating an understanding of the system, and providing evidence of due diligence.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 1 - Power Reactors

# Power Reactors (Division 1): Regulatory Guides 1.21 - 1.40

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 1, "Power Reactors," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 1.1 - 1.20
          - Regulatory Guides 1.21 - 1.40
          - Regulatory Guides 1.41 - 1.60
          - Regulatory Guides 1.61 - 1.80
          - Regulatory Guides 1.81 - 1.100
          - Regulatory Guides 1.101 - 1.120
          - Regulatory Guides 1.121 - 1.140
          - Regulatory Guides 1.141 - 1.160
          - Regulatory Guides 1.161 - 1.180
          - Regulatory Guides 1.181 - 1.200
          - Regulatory Guides 1.201 - 1.220
          - Regulatory Guides 1.221 - 1.240
          - Regulatory Guides 1.241 - 1.253

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 23, 2024
*January 13, 1931.*

#### Will of Sherman: Sherman, Appellant, vs. Sherman and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Thomas F. Hayden*of Milwaukee/

For the respondents: *Otjen & Otjen,*attorneys, and *Chauncey Yockey*of Milwaukee, guardian *ad litem.*

*By the Court.*

Order and judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Development and Testing of ENDF/B-VI.8 and ENDF/B-VII.0 Coupled Neutron-Gamma Libraries for SCALE 6 (NUREG/CR-6990)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6990 (PDF - 18.5 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2008**Date Published:**February 2009

**Prepared by:**D. Wiarda, M.E. Dunn, D.E. Peplow, T.M. Miller and H. Akkurt

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryManaged by UT-Battelle, LLCOak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

A.B. Barto, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J5609

Availability Notice

## Abstract

New coupled neutron-gamma shielding libraries have been developed for use with the SCALE (Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation) code system. Two libraries have been generated based on the Evaluated Nuclear Data File/B Version VI (ENDF/B-VI) Release 8 (ENDF/B-VI.8) and ENDF/B-VII Release 0 (ENDF/B-VII.0) cross-section evaluations. Both libraries were generated using 200 neutron and 47 gamma groups. The neutron group structure is identical to the 199-group VITAMIN-B6 structure except an additional neutron group has been added to extend the top energy boundary to 20 MeV. In addition to the “fine-group” libraries, a “broad-group” ENDF/B-VII.0 library has been generated using a 27 neutron and 19 gamma group structure. In addition to the coupled cross-section library development, new shielding codes Monaco and MAVRIC (Monaco with Automated Variance Reduction using Importance Calculations) have been developed for SCALE. This report documents the ENDF/B-VI.8 and ENDF/B-VII.0 cross-section library development and the benchmark testing of the new libraries with the new SCALE shielding transport codes Monaco and MAVRIC.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2015064EN.01001501.xml

| 7.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 64/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/15

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/376

of 6 March 2015

implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 of 2 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 2 March 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 204/2011. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 2 March 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.

| (2) | Following the judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2014 in Case T-348/13 (2), Kadhaf Al Dam v Council, the entry concerning Ahmed Mohammed Qadhaf Al-Dam should be deleted from Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011. Furthermore, the entry concerning one other person as set out in that Annex should be updated. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2014 in Case T-348/13 (2), Kadhaf Al Dam v Council, the entry concerning Ahmed Mohammed Qadhaf Al-Dam should be deleted from Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011. Furthermore, the entry concerning one other person as set out in that Annex should be updated.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2015.

For the Council

The President

K. GERHARDS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.

1

(2)  Not yet published in the ECR.

2

---

ANNEX

1.

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘1. | ABDULHAFIZ, Colonel Mas'ud (a.k.a. ABDULHAFID (last name); Massoud (first name)) | Position: Armed Forces Commander
  Date of birth: 1 January 1937
  Place of birth: Tripoli, Libya | 3rd in command of Armed Forces. Significant role in Military Intelligence. | 28.2.2011’ |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

‘1.

ABDULHAFIZ, Colonel Mas'ud (a.k.a. ABDULHAFID (last name); Massoud (first name))

Position: Armed Forces Commander

Date of birth: 1 January 1937

Place of birth: Tripoli, Libya

3rd in command of Armed Forces. Significant role in Military Intelligence.

28.2.2011’

2.

| ‘8. | QADHAF AL-DAM, Ahmed Mohammed.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘8.

---
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 117B Toxicity Characteristic Amendment 57 FR 23062
- 23063 Ju ne 1, 1992 (RCRA Cluster III, HSWA provision) Note: T he Toxicity Characteristic rule [55 FR 11798 (March 29, 1990); Revision Checklist 74] and its subsequent amendments [55 FR 26986 (June 29, 1001) and 57 FR 30657 (July 10, 1992); Revision Checklist 74] omitted changing the reference to the "Extraction Procedure Toxicity Characteristic" at 261.3 (a)(2)(i). T he March 3, 1992 reissuance of the "mixture" and "derived
- from " rules, reissued 261.3 with that error still in it. T he Ju ne 1, 1992 amendment (57 FR 23062) to that reissued code corrected this error. B ecause this change makes the Federal code more stringent, it is required and was placed in a checklist separate from the other provisions (considered optional, for States) addressing the reissuance of the "mixture" and "derived
- from" rules. 

### Name of state: W ashington State Statutory

Authority: Chapter 70.105 RCW Title of Regulations: C hapter 1730
- 303 WAC E ffective Date: July 31, 2009 Date Checklist Completed: May 10, 2010
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION ST AT E ANALOG IS: EQUIV
ALENT LESS

STRIN
GENT MORE

STRIN
GENT BROADER

IN SCOPE PART 261
- IDENT IF ICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SUBPART A
- GENERAL DEFINIT ION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE change "Extraction Procedure Toxicity characteristic" to "Toxicity Characteristic" 261.3(a)(2)(i) 

### No direct analog, but use 070(3), except (a)(iii) and (c) More stringent because the state does not exclude mining wastes X X
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1958 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include retrofit loans such as property 

assessed clean energy loans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself and Mr. ROYCE of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include retrofit 

loans such as property assessed clean energy loans, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 from Credit Entanglements Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘PACE 

6 Act of 2017’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REAL PROPERTY RETROFIT LOANS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 103 of the Truth in Lend9 ing Act (15 U.S.C. 1602) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1958 IH

1 (1) in subsection (g), in the last sentence, by in2 serting ‘‘and a person who lends money to con3 sumers for real property retrofit loans’’ before ‘‘for 

4 purposes’’; 

5 (2) by redesignating subsection (cc) (relating to 

6 definitions relating to mortgage origination and resi7 dential mortgage loans) and (dd) as subsections (dd) 

8 and (ee), respectively; and 

9 (3) adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(ff) The term ‘consumer credit transaction’ includes 

11 a real property retrofit loan extended to a consumer. 

12 ‘‘(gg) The term ‘real property retrofit loan’ means a 

13 financing instrument— 

14 ‘‘(1) secured by an interest in real property; 

15 ‘‘(2) that is repayable in installments through 

16 payments made concurrently with the payment of 

17 property taxes on the real property; and 

18 ‘‘(3) that is used to finance real property retro19 fits, including property assessed clean energy loans 

20 for the purposes of energy efficiency upgrades, re21 newable energy installations, windproofing or seismic 

22 retrofits, water conservation upgrades, septic tanks, 

23 or other similar real property improvements or retro24 fits to a particular parcel of property.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1958 IH

1 (b) REAL PROPERTY RETROFIT LOAN DISCLO2 SURE.—Section 128 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

3 U.S.C. 1638) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(g) REAL PROPERTY RETROFIT LOAN DISCLO6 SURE.—At the time of application for a real property ret7 rofit loan, the creditor shall disclose that the real property 

8 retrofit loan will result in a lien on the real property secur9 ing the loan’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered September 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 13 - 00854 - CV HALLIBURTON ENERGY S ERVICES, INC., Appellant V. AXIS TECHNOLOGIES, L LC , ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 00267 - D 

### O RDER We GRANT the September 19, 2013 unopposed motion of nonresident attorney, Phillip L. Free, Jr., for admission pro hac vice . We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Phillip L. Free, Jr. as counsel pro hac vice

.
/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
Sssessor: POWERS I Search ( )Y FOCUS Date: 

Health: L --M Focus Rep:

SAT 

IEco: 

Max. PV Manuf. Submitter: Summit Specialty Chemicals Corporatior (WY r) Import X 

Phenol, polymer with 4,4'-bis(methoxymethyl)-l , 1'-biphenyl 

E IT1 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
I I I 

FOR MU^ c,H, 0 Yo< 500 1 

PROPERTY 1 Submitted ICB-CRSS 

I 

Method/Ref 

IMP (C) 

BP (C) 

70.00 - 80.00 

>5001@ 760 torr EPI 

70.00 

545.91 I@760 tor 

@ P (torr) 

VP (torr) 7.78e-22 EPI 9.60E-12 

S-H20 (g/L) 2.27e-10 EPI 0.122 mg/t 

MOL WT 600.00 O/. < too0 

S-Org (g/L) mg/L 

Log Kow I I 6.84 

PH, pKa I Log Koc 7.90 

Light Absorption (nm)l c > 290 I LogBCF I BCF 4.57 I 37000.00 

Solvent: I H (atm m3/mol) 1.00E-08 

Volatilization (H20) t(1/2) River I 1000.00 I hr Lake 1000.00 Ida 

AOP t(1/2) (hr) lOHl 1.40 03 1 Total 1.40 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
I 

c, Y 

CATEGORY 

RATING 1 2 3 4 

4NAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION Ultimate <=days weeks months @-

Primary <= days weeks months > months 

HYDRO (da) 

iYDROLYSIS A. e= mins hours days => months 

(t(1/2) @ pH 7, 25 C) B. e= mins hours days => months 

Comments: 

SORPTION TO SOIL & SEDIMENT I strong I moderate I low 

vllGRATlON TO GROUND WATER I \ negl/ 1 slow 1 moderate I rapid 

JOLATltlZATlON I Rivers (hr) I 1000 I I negl I slow I moderate I rapid 

(t(1/2) w/o sediment1 Lakes (da) I 1000 1 negl I SbW I moderate I rapid 

>HOTOLYSIS ]A. Direct I I negl 1 slow I moderate I rapid 

]B. Indirect I I negl slow I moderate I rapid 

AOP t(1/2) hr 

4TMOSPHERIC A. OH *,[d( negl slow moderate rapid 

OXIDATION B. 03 /vi ‘ negl slow moderate rapid 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
c 

s 

. 

Final 

October 18,2000 PageY of5 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: PO01220 Assessor: 

. Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 2. 

Release Activity: Processing 

Total Releases: I 0.001 0.00 1200.00 0.00 0.00 

Release Dayslyr: 

Per Site Release: I 0.001 0.001 600.00) 0.001 0.00 

(kglY) WYr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: Incineration release is less than 200 kghitelyear after 99.9% removal. 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
t- r 

Page3 of 5 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Total Releases: 

Release Dayslyr: 

Per Site Release: 

0. 0. 

I 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
#### Joe Don SARSYCKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7984.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 30, 1965.

Randolf H. Aires, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty. (B. Andrew Potter, U. S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of various narcotic offenses appellant Sarsycki seeks reversal on the sole ground that the prosecutor’s closing argument was unfair and improper. That argument contains metaphorical allusions and oratorical efforts which are not befitting an officer who is charged with the duty of fairly, firmly, and dispassionately prosecuting offenses against federal statutes. Sill Corporation v. United States, 10 Cir., 343 F.2d 411. The question is whether the argument was so offensive as to deprive appellant of a fair trial. McManaman v. United States, 10 Cir., 327 F.2d 21, 24, certiorari denied sub nom. Jenkins v. United States, 377 U.S. 945, 84 S.Ct. 1351, 12 L.Ed.2d 307.

The record shows that appellant engaged in the narcotic traffic. The evidence of the government was not denied. The trial judge ruled that the argument was within proper limits. In our opinion the flamboyant statements could not have unfairly or unduly influenced the jury.

Affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00314

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B .M.A., A

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On September 3, 2010, and September 27, 2010 , we notified appellant, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28, 2007, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Appellan t shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 28, 2010

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing

fees in courts of appeals).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2022

Subscribe to receive our news releases by email.

JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches
No. 82-5982.

#### Lucien *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 15 August 5, 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549 RE: Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries 1)S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290 and Registration No. 333-83007) 1995
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to
Certain Directors and Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan 2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907 and Registration No. 333-55470)
1998 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan Commissioners: We are aware that our report dated July 15, 2004 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three month and six month periods ended June 26, 2004 and included
in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to above. Very truly yours, /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 42