alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0.2

0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5**T o** **n s** **/ D** **a y**  

### SO2**Tr end 2009** 

**- 2024** 

Jefferson Shelby
Jefferson +Shelby
Walker

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

2009 2015 2024

**Year**2009 2015 2024

Jefferson 0.35 0.24 0.27 Shelby 0.08 0.05 0.06 Jefferson + Shelby 0.43 0.28 0.32 Walker 0.003 0.002 0.002**Month 2015 Jefferson--SO2 (tons/day)**  **2015 Shelby--SO2 (tons/day)** 1 0.21 0.043 2 0.22 0.045 3 0.22 0.046 4 0.23 0.048 5 0.24 0.05 6 0.25 0.052 7 0.26 0.054 8 0.26 0.054 9 0.24 0.049 10 0.24 0.049 11 0.22 0.046 12 0.23 0.047

**Av erage Tons/Day**  0.235 0.048583333**2015 Jefferson + Shelby--SO2 (tons/day) 2015 Walker--SO2 (tons/day)**  0.253 0.001 0.265 0.001 0.266 0.001 0.278 0.002 0.29 0.002 0.302 0.002 0.314 0.002 0.314 0.002 0.289 0.002 0.289 0.002 0.266 0.001 0.277 0.002

0.283583333 0.001666667**Month 2024 Jefferson--SO2 (tons/day)**  **2024 Shelby--SO2 (tons/day)** 1 0.24 0.05 2 0.25 0.05 3 0.25 0.05 4 0.26 0.05 5 0.28 0.06 6 0.29 0.06 7 0.3 0.06 8 0.3 0.06 9 0.27 0.06 10 0.27 0.06 11 0.26 0.05 12 0.26 0.05

**Av erage Tons/Day**  0.269166667 0.055**2024 Jefferson + Shelby--SO2 (tons/day) 2024 Walker--SO2 (tons/day)**  0.29 0.002 0.3 0.002 0.3 0.002 0.31 0.002 0.34 0.002 0.35 0.002 0.36 0.002 0.36 0.002 0.33 0.002 0.33 0.002 0.31 0.002 0.31 0.002

0.324166667 0.002**2009 2015**  **2024 SO2 (tons/day)**  **SO2 (tons/day) SO2 (tons/day)**  **Jefferson County** 0.35 0.24 0.27 **Shelby County** 0.08 0.05 0.06 **Jefferson County + Shelby County** 0.43 0.28 0.32 **Walker County** 0.003 0.002 0.002**Month 2009 Jefferson--SO2 (tons/day)**  **2009 Shelby--SO2 (tons/day)** 1 0.3 0.06 2 0.31 0.07 3 0.33 0.07 4 0.35 0.07 5 0.36 0.08 6 0.39 0.08 7 0.4 0.09 8 0.4 0.09 9 0.37 0.08 10 0.35 0.08 11 0.34 0.07 12 0.33 0.07

**Av erage Tons/Day**  0.3525 0.075833333**2009 Jefferson + Shelby--SO2 (tons/day) 2009 Walker--SO2 (tons/day)**  0.36 0.002 0.38 0.003 0.4 0.003 0.42 0.003 0.44 0.003 0.47 0.003 0.49 0.003 0.49 0.003 0.45 0.003 0.43 0.003 0.41 0.003 0.4 0.003

0.428333333 0.002916667**NOx (tons/day) SO2 (tons/day)**  **PM Fine (tons/day)** 

**Jefferson County** 58.8 0.35 1.7 **Shelby County** 12.7 0.08 0.4 **Jefferson County + Shelby County** 71.5 0.43 2.1 **Walker County** 0.55 0.003 0.02 **2009 NOx (tons/day)**  **SO2 (tons/day) PM** **Fine (tons/day) NOx (tons/day)**  **SO2 (tons/day)**

35.5 0.24 0.96 20.6 0.27 7.6 0.05 0.21 4.4 0.06 43.1 0.28 1.2 25 0.32 0.33 0.002 0.009 0.2 0.002

**2015 2024** **PM Fine (tons/day)** 

0.52 0.11 0.63 0.005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.12

                         FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF
                                PURCHASE AND SALE

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE dated October 15,
2003, by and between SRS Medical Corp., a Washington Corporation ("Buyer") and
Timm Medical Technologies, Inc. ("Seller").

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the Parties executed and delivered the Agreement of Purchase
and Sale dated October 15, 2003, relating to SRS Medical Corp., purchase or
certain assets from Timm Medical Technologies.

         WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to amend the Original Agreement by means
of this Agreement to change the minimum guarantee payments required by the
Buyer.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
promises contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT

         The schedule of deferred payment, Schedule 1.05, is hereby amended to
be the following:


<PAGE>

                                  Schedule 1.05

                            Deferred Payment Schedule

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               QUARTER                                  MINIMUM DEFERRED PAYMENT
               -------                                  ------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
               Q4 2003                                                        $0
               Q1 2004                                            Actual Results
               Q2 2004                                            Actual Results
               Q3 2004                                            Actual Results
               Q4 2004                                                   $45,000
               Q1 2005                                                   $47,000
               Q2 2005                                                   $52,000
               Q3 2005                                                   $55,000
               Q4 2005                                                   $60,000
Q2 2006 and thereafter                 $60,000 per quarter until the outstanding
                                       principal and accrued and unpaid interest
                                      under the Promissory Note is paid in full.
</TABLE>


ENDOCARE, INC.                                  SRS MEDICAL CORP.


--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Print Name                                      Print Name

/s/ William J. Nydam     3/25/04                /s/ Kevin Connolly        4/1/04
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Signature                 Date                  Signature                  Date
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson                    
|Kirk A. Benson                        
|Chief Executive Officer August 5,
2008
|                                      
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart                 
|Steven G. Stewart                     
|Chief Financial Officer August 5,
2008
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center (NUREG-1955)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1955 (PDF - 45.1 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed** September 2010**Date Published:** November 2010

**Prepared by:**

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) license renewal application (LRA) by the United States (U.S.) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (the staff). By letter dated September 30, 2008, Florida Power and Light Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (FPL-DA or the applicant) submitted the LRA in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the *Code of Federal Regulations*, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." FPL-DA requests renewal of the DAEC operating license (Facility Operating License Number DPR-49) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration at midnight February 21, 2014.

DAEC is located approximately 8 miles northwest of Cedar Rapids, IA. The NRC issued the construction permit for DAEC on June 22, 1970. The NRC issued the operating license for DAEC on November 22, 1974. General Electric supplied the Mark 1 boiling water reactor (BWR) design nuclear steam supply system and Bechtel Power Corporation originally designed and constructed the balance of the plant. The licensed power output is 1,912 megawatts-thermal with a gross electrical output of approximately 629 megawatts-electric.

This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted through August 18, 2010, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER. On May 7, 2010, the staff issued a draft SER which identified two open items that had to be resolved before the staff could make a final determination on the application. The two open items have now been resolved. SER Section 1.5 summarizes these items and their resolutions. SER Section 6 provides the staff's final conclusion on the review of the DAEC LRA that the requirements for license renewal have been met.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2015066EN.01000101.xml

| 24.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 17 February 2015

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (eighth EDF) for the financial year 2013

(2015/C 66/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the fourth ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Mauritius on 4 November 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing and administration of the Community aid under the Second Financial Protocol to the fourth ACP-EC Convention (3) (the ‘Internal Agreement’) setting up, amongst others, the eighth European Development Fund (eighth EDF), and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

3

Having regard to the Financial Regulation 98/430/EC of 16 June 1998 applicable to development finance cooperation under the fourth ACP-EC Convention (4), and in particular Articles 66 to 74 thereof,

4

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eighth EDF as at 31 December 2013 and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2013, together with the Commission’s replies contained in that Annual Report (5),

5

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2013 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2013 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eighth EDF for the financial year 2013.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. REIRS

---

(1)  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 108.

3

(4)  OJ L 191, 7.7.1998, p. 53.

4

(5)  OJ C 398, 12.11.2014, p. 289.

5

---
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

NUREG-Series Reports                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
#### In re CACTUS ENERGY COMPANY, Debtor. CANADIAN EXPLORATION CORP., Plaintiff, v. CACTUS ENERGY COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. Bk-81-2184.

Adv. No. 84-0356.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

Jan. 3, 1985.

J. Michael Nordin, McAfee & Taft, P.C., Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

Monty L. Bratcher, Bratcher, Latting & Teague, P.C., Oklahoma City, Okl., for trustee.

DECISION

RICHARD L. BOHANON, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this adversary proceeding plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that its claim is secured. The trustee defends on the grounds that the lien which plaintiff claims to hold was not perfected properly under state law; and that, therefore, he may avoid it under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3).

The issues have been joined by a Motion for Summary Judgment based upon stipulated facts.

The facts are similar to those we addressed in *Kenan, Trustee v. Hilliard Oil & Gas, Inc.,*38 B.R. 826 (Bankr.W.D.1984 Okla.). Plaintiff operates oil and gas leases in which the debtor holds working interests pursuant to the American Association of Petroleum Landmen form of operating agreement. The debtor failed to pay all its share of the costs and plaintiff filed a statutory lien statement pursuant to 42 O.S.1981 § 144. The question is whether this filing constituted proper perfection under Oklahoma law.

In *Kenan*we held that pursuant to *Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards,*60 Okl. 63, 158 P. 1187 (1916) filing a statutory lien *295upon the interest of a party to a contract to develop common property was not proper perfection and, thus, a trustee — bona fide purchaser could avoid it.

A motion for new trial was granted in *Kenan*to hear issues other than those concerning the holding of *Uncle Sam.*Before our consideration of these new issues the parties reached a compromise and the complaint was dismissed. Subsequently an order was entered pursuant to Fed.R. Bankr.P. 9024 to clarify that the decision remains effective subject only to any modification that might have resulted from consideration of the new issues.

Our review of the papers submitted on this Motion for Summary Judgment does not persuade us that the holding in *Kenan*should be disturbed.

Accordingly plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and an appropriate judgment will be entered.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2022

# Recent FOIA Requests - July 2022

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during June 2022. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 11, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 11, 2022
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**









The
      undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
      that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
      period ended September 30, 2006 to which this certification is being
      furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                July 10, 2007/s/
                ROBERT A. FERGUSONRobert
                A. FergusonPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
                Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,558)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,719
<PP&E>                                       2,642,509
<DEPRECIATION>                               (161,649)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,651,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,709
<BONDS>                                      1,027,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,479,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,651,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,031
<CGS>                                          139,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.84
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Compendium of Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response Analyses to Severe Fire Accident Scenarios, Final Report (NUREG/CR-7209, PNNL-24792)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7209, PNNL-24792 (PDF – 3.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2016**Date Published:**March 2017

**Prepared by:** J. A. Fort J. M. Cuta H. E. Adkins, Jr.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

J. Piotter, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code J5710

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document summarizes studies of truck and rail transport accidents involving fires, relative to regulatory requirements for shipment of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF). These studies were initiated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in response to a 2006 National Academy of Sciences review of procedures and regulations. The fire accident scenarios were based on the severe historical railway and roadway fires in terms of their potential impact on SNF containers.

While no such accidents involving SNF have ever actually happened in shipments either by rail or roadway, accidents resulting in fires do occur in both modes of transport and, however unlikely, plausible arguments can be made for the possibility of SNF containers being involved in such accidents. A regulatory framework for SNF containers is in place in the United States (10 CFR 71) and internationally (International Atomic Energy Agency) to ensure that risk due to such accidents is small and that the danger to the public is within accepted standards. The history of this regulatory framework is briefly summarized.

The combined summary of this work on fire accidents demonstrates that current U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations and packaging standards provide a high degree of protection to the public health and safety against releases of radioactive material in real-world transportation accidents, were such events to involve SNF containers.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021