alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Differing Professional Views or Opinions: 2002 Special Review Panel Report (NUREG-1763)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1763 (PDF 2.96 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2002**Date Published:** September 2002

****Office of Human Resources Human Resources Policy and Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

On March 20, 2001, the Executive Director for Operations (EDO) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established a Special Review Panel (SRP or the Panel), to be chaired by James A. Fitzgerald, Deputy Director, Office of Investigations, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Differing Professional Views/Differing Professional Opinions process, as implemented by NRC Management Directive (MD) 10.159, "Differing Professional Views or Opinions." The EDO appointed four senior managers and one National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) representative to the Panel. The last SRP to review the DPV/DPO Process was convened in 1994.

The EDO directed the Panel to review the informal and formal processes for dealing with differing professional views or opinions. The EDO also directed the Panel to review all DPV/DPOs filed since the last SRP and identify employees whose DPV/DPOs made significant contributions to the agency or to the public health and safety, but may not have been adequately recognized for this contribution. Finally, the EDO asked the Panel to make recommendations on the interim policy guidance he issued in response to the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) audit and on any other DPV/DPO process issues the Panel believes the Agency should address.

This report documents the SRP's review of the NRC's current DPV/DPO process. The Panel reviewed previous SRP reports, DPV/DPO case files for submittals received and processed since the last review in 1994, other federal agency programs for handling DPV/DPOs, and the OIG September 2000 audit report (OIG-00-A-07) on its Review of NRC's Differing Professional View/Differing Professional Opinion Program. The Panel interviewed selected NRC regional and headquarters senior managers on their views and perspectives of the DPV/DPO process, and interviewed a number of DPV/DPO filers and ad hoc panel members about their views, perspectives, and personal experiences with the process. This report gives the SRP's recommendations for improving the DPV/DPO Process.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Consent of Ryder Scott, L.P.



 Exhibit 10.3 
 



 
 February 2, 2011 

Repsol YPF 
 Paseo de La Castellana, 278-280

 28046 Madrid 
 España 

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Ryder Scott Company, L.P. consents to the references to our firm
included in Repsol YPF, S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to the inclusion of our report dated March 24, 2010, as an exhibit to Repsol YPF, S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the
year ended December 31, 2009. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.
	TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
	
	/s/ Herman G. Acuña
	
	Herman G. Acuña, P.E.
	Texas P.E. License No. 92254
	Managing Senior Vice President–International
	
	



                        



HGA 
  

							
		 	600,    1015    4TH STREET, S.W. CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4        TEL (403) 262-2799	 	FAX (403) 262-2790	 	
		 	621    17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 TEL (303) 623-9147	 	FAX (303) 623-4258
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State,

v.

CALEB CONSTANCIO-TOLEDO,

 

 Appellee.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00197-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Williamson County, Texas

(TC# 14092573-1)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

November 29, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Dee Hobbs, the State’s Attorney, prepare the State’s

brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 29, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of October, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, CJ, Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Facility Steam Cooling with Droplet Injection Experiments Data Report (NUREG/CR-7192)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL QUINTON BONNER,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-55237

D.C. No. 8:99-cv-00091-DOCMAN

Central District of California, 

Santa Ana

AMENDING ORDER

Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG, District Judge.

*

The memorandum disposition filed on May 16, 2013, is hereby amended as

follows:

Page 2, line 17, delete “twenty-nine months” and insert “twenty-one

months” in its place.

With this amendment, the Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing is DENIED. 

The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no

judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. Petitioner’s Motion for

FILED

AUG 06 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * The Honorable Richard Seeborg, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Rehearing En Banc is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or

rehearing en banc will be entertained. 

2
#### First National Bank of Hartford, Respondent, vs. City of Hartford, Appellant.

*June 20, 1927.*

The following order was filed June 20, 1927:

Per Curiam.

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court (47 Sup. Ct. 462) upon the writ of error issued on July 1, 1925, to review the judgment in the above entitled cause having been received by the clerk of this court, on motion of the attorneys for the respondent:

It is ordered and adjudged that the said mandate be filed and entered in this court, and that pursuant to the command thereof the judgment entered in this court in the above entitled cause on April 7, 1925 (187 Wis. 290, 203 N. W. 721), reversing the judgment of the circuit court for Washington county therein, be and the same is in all things vacated and set aside; and

It is further ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court for Washington county appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs in favor of the respondent and against appellant, including the costs taxable upon the proceedings in the United States Supreme Court.

*495CASES DETERMINED AT THE August Term, 1927.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActClosed Requests

# Closed Appeal & FOIA/PA Cases by Subject - FY 2008

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41




                                    AMENDMENT


                                       OF


                                OVERALL AGREEMENT


                              DATED 1 FEBRUARY 2001


                                     BETWEEN


                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                       AND


                             PPL SHIPYARD PTE. LTD.

<PAGE>   2

                         AMENDMENT OF OVERALL AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT OF OVERALL AGREEMENT is entered into effective on the 1st day of
February 2001 by and between Santa Fe International Corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands ("SFIC") and PPL Shipyard Pte.
Ltd., organized and existing under the laws of Singapore ("Builder").

WHEREAS, SFIC and Builder entered into that certain Overall Agreement dated
February 1, 2001; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Overall Agreement as set out herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained herein, SFIC and Builder hereby agree as follows:

1.       In Article 2, add a new Clause 2.7, as follows:

         Quote

         2.7      Notwithstanding Clause 2.3 hereof, Article III, Paragraph 1(c)
                  of the contracts in respect of the Option Vessels shall be
                  modified at lines 1-2 by replacing the words "sixty-two (62)
                  calendar days" with "thirty-one (31) calendar days" and at
                  lines 3-4 by replacing the words "sixty-second (62nd) calendar
                  day" with "thirty-first (31st) calendar day".

         Unquote

Except as amended above, all the terms and conditions of the Overall Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect and are unaltered by this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment of Overall
Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


SIGNED BY                                )
on behalf of                             )
SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION       )
in the presence of:                      )


SIGNED BY                                )
on behalf of                             )
PPL SHIPYARD PTE. LTD.                   )
in the presence of:                      )
No. 86-5020.

#### Booth *v.*Maryland.

Ct. App. Md. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 882.] Motion of Stephanie Roper Foundation, Inc., for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*out of time granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
METROPOLITAN FINANCIAL CORP. SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q, INCLUDING THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,135
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,540
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    216,259
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,002
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,002
<LOANS>                                      1,244,236
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,576,497
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,189,006
<SHORT-TERM>                                    58,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,980
<LONG-TERM>                                    218,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,576,497
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 69,739
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,624
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                82,363
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              41,281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,642
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,721
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,050
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,948
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,816
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,115
<LOANS-PAST>                                       442
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,342
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,909
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,648
<RECOVERIES>                                        21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,332
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,332
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Review and Evaluation of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Safety Research Program: A Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG-1635)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2015287EN.01006701.xml

| 31.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 287/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 287/67

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1965

of 27 October 2015

on the acceptance of Switzerland's Contribution for the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/4/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions to EUAM Ukraine by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to take relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions to EUAM Ukraine by third States.

| (2) | The Civilian Operations Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contribution from Switzerland to EUAM Ukraine and consider the contribution as significant. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Civilian Operations Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contribution from Switzerland to EUAM Ukraine and consider the contribution as significant.

| (3) | Switzerland should be exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUAM Ukraine, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Switzerland should be exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUAM Ukraine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Third States' contributions

1.   The contribution from Switzerland to EUAM Ukraine is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Switzerland is exempted from financial contributions to the operational budget of EUAM Ukraine.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The NACOM Code for Analysis of Postulated Sodium Spray Fires in LMFBRs (NUREG/CR-1405, BNL-NUREG-51180)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-1405 (PDF - 2.51 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 1979 **Date Published:**March 1980

**Prepared by:** S.S. Tsai Engineering and Advanced Reactor Safety Division Department of Nuclear Energy Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 11973

**Prepared for:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Under Interagency Agreement DE-AC02-76CH00016

NRC FIN A-3000 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An analysis of potential sodium spills and fires in liquid metal fast breeder reactors has been made to assess the maximum equipment cell loading conditions. A computer code called NACOM (sodium combustion) has been developed at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) to analyze sodium spray fires. This report contains a detailed description of physical models used in this code as well as programming aspects. The single droplet combustion model and the model describing the droplets' motion are verified. Comparisons between NACOM predictions and SPRAY-3A predictions of the Atomics International (AI) LTV Jet Tests are made. Good agreement is found between the NACOM predictions and the experimental data. NACOM predictions of the pressure rise are more ac-curate than SPRAY-3A predictions for most of the cases studied. The code has been verified for oxygen concentrations ranging from 0 to 21%. NACOM utilizes more realistic single droplet and spray combustion models than SPRAY-3A. Moreover, NACOM does not utilize adjustable parameters for the burning rate equations, contrary to the approach taken with SPRAY-3A. Thus, the NACOM code is a more reliable code for use in the analysis of large-scale sodium spray fires in LMFBR containment cells. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Vietnam Discuss COVID-19 Aid, New Program to Find War Dead

By Jim GaramoneDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 
OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1)                                                                   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
    13(a) or 15(d) of      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
|                                                                     
|(2)                                                                   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
    in all material respects,
|the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



|Dated:  February 26, 2003 |  | /s/ C. Park
    Shaper                                                  
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | C. Park Shaper
    Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.10

 

Amendment No. 1 to

Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note

of

Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.

 

WHEREAS, the Canadian Forest Oil Ltd. (the “Corporation”) previously has executed and delivered a Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”), payable to Forest Oil Corporation, as the Holder (“Forest”), in the maximum principal amount of US$200,000,000; and

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation and Forest now wish to amend the Promissory Note to increase the maximum principal amount thereof to $250,000,000.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Promissory Note shall be amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective as of May 13, 2010, all references to the aggregate principal amount that may be outstanding under the Promissory Note shall be increased to $250,000,000.

 

2.                                      The Promissory Note, as amended hereby, is ratified and reaffirmed in all respects.

 

IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has hereunto set its hand effective for all purposes.

 

	
 
    	
CANADIAN   FOREST OIL LTD.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   David M. Anderson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
David   M. Anderson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    


 

1