alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ HUSTEEL CO., LTD., ILJIN STEEL CORPORATION, AJU BES TEEL CO., LTD., SEAH STEEL CORP., Plaintiffs HYUNDAI STEEL COMPAN Y, FKA HYUNDAI HYSCO, Plaintiff

- Appellee NEXTEEL CO., LTD., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. UNITED STATES, BOOMERANG TUBE LLC, ENERGEX TUBE (A

DIVISION OF JMC STEE L GROUP), TEJAS TUBULAR PRODUCTS, TM K IPSCO , VALLOUREC STAR, L.P., WELDED T UBE USA INC., Defendants

- Appellees MAVERICK TUBE CORPOR ATION, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORA TION, Defendants

- Cross

- Appellants

______________________ 2016

- 2732, 2017

- 1013, 2017

- 1014

______________________Appeals from the Uni ted States Court of International Trade in No s . 1:14

- cv - 00215

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00221

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00223

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00238

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00243

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00253

- JAR, 1:14

- cv - 00257

- JAR, 1:14

- cv 00264

- JAR, Senior Judge Jane A. Restani.

______________________ JUDGMENT

______________________ J AEHONG D AVID P ARK , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Plaintiff

- appellant and plaintiff

- appellee also represented by H ENRY D AVID A LMOND , S YLVIA Y. C HEN , D ANIEL R OBERT W ILSON ; A NDREW M ERCER T REASTER , Denver, CO. H ARDEEP K AUR J OSAN , International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, New York, NY, argued for defendant

- appellee United States. Also repr esented by C HAD A. R EADLER , J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , C LAUDIA B URKE ; M YKHAYLO G RYZLOV , Office of the Assi stant Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compl iance, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. R OBERT E. D E F RANCESCO , III , Wiley Rein, LLP, Was hington, DC, argued for defendant

- cross - appellant Mave rick Tube Corporation. Also represented by A LAN H. P RICE , L AURA E L -S ABAAWI , J EFFREY O WEN F RANK , A DAM M ILAN T ESLIK
. R OGER B RIAN S CHAGRIN , Schagrin As sociates, Was hington, DC, for defendants

- appellees Boomerang Tube LLC, Energex Tube, Tejas Tubular Products, TMK IPSCO, Vallourec Star, L.P., Welded Tube USA Inc. Also represented by J OHN W. B OHN , C HRISTOPHER C LOUTIER , P AUL W RIGHT J AMESON
.D EBBIE L EILANI S HON , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant

- cross appellant United States Steel Corporation. Also repr esented by J OSEF A NSORGE , J ONATHAN G ORDON C OOPER , J ON D AVID C OREY , K ELSEY R ULE
.

______________________ T HIS C AUSE hav ing been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , M AYER , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ). AFFIRMED . See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption for aggregation 
     of emissions from oil and gas sources, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

  Mr. Polis (for himself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Capuano, Ms. 
 Judy Chu of California, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Connolly, Ms. 
    DeGette, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Huffman, Mr. 
   Keating, Mr. Langevin, Ms. Lee, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lowenthal, Mrs. 
 Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Ms. McCollum, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Meng, 
 Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Norton, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Pocan, 
Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Scott of 
 Virginia, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Soto, Ms. Speier, Mr. Takano, 
Mr. Tonko, Ms. Tsongas, and Ms. Maxine Waters of California) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption for aggregation 
     of emissions from oil and gas sources, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bringing Reductions to Energy's 
Airborne Toxic Health Effects Act'' or the ``BREATHE Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXEMPTION FOR AGGREGATION OF EMISSIONS FROM OIL AND 
              GAS SOURCES.

    Section 112(n) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(n)) is amended 
by striking paragraph (4).

SEC. 3. HYDROGEN SULFIDE AS A HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall--
            (1) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, issue a final rule adding hydrogen sulfide to the 
        list of hazardous air pollutants under section 112(b) of the 
        Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(b)); and
            (2) not later than 365 days after a final rule under 
        paragraph (1) is issued, revise the list under section 112(c) 
        of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(c)) to include categories and 
        subcategories of major sources and area sources of hydrogen 
        sulfide, including oil and gas wells.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 1:50 PM

To: 'info@terraimaging.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation - Terra Imaging LLC

Dear Mr. Karl Engstrom:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0386). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

‐ set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 5/20/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# The FSAR Transients Analysis of Lungmen ABWR Using TRACE/PARCS (NUREG/IA-0431)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0431 (PDF - 3.47 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2013**Date Published:** September 2013

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chia-Ying Chang*, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, TAIWAN

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This study consists of two steps. The first step is the development of a TRACE (TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine)/PARCS(Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator) model of Lungmen nuclear power plant (NPP) which includes the vessel, reactor internal pumps (RIPs), main steam lines, and important control systems (such as the feedwater control system, steam bypass & pressure control system, and recirculation flow control system), etc.. Key parameters are identified to refine the TRACE/PARCS model further in the frame of a steady state analysis. The second step is the performance of Lungmen NPP TRACE/PARCS model transient analyses. The transient data of Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) chapter 15th are used to compare with the analysis results of the Lungmen NPP TRACE/PARCS model. The trends of TRACE/PARCS analysis results are consistent with the FSAR data for the important parameters. However, there are some difference in their bypass valve flow response, scram reactivity and void reactivity.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Guidance for the Review of Changes to Human Actions (NUREG-1764)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
NUMBER 13-20-00506-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

RANDY GUAJARDO, Appellee.

On appeal from the 445th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On November 30, 2020, the State, as the appellant, filed its second amended 

“Petition for Stay Pending Disposition of Appeal.” In the underlying case, Randy 

Guajardo filed a motion for speedy trial. In the motion, he asserted that he has was 

arrested for a crime that allegedly occurred in March 2017 and yet the trial has not been 

scheduled. Guajardo then simply requested at the end of his motion that “trial in this 
2

case be scheduled.” The trial court granted the motion. This appeal and motion for stay 

ensued.

Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

(a) The state is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal case if the 

order:

(1) dismisses an indictment, information, or complaint or any portion 

of an indictment, information, or complaint;

. . .

(e) The state is entitled to a stay in the proceedings pending the disposition 

of an appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of this article.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. art. 44.01.

On appeal, the State avers the following: “it is the State's understanding and belief

that the Honorable Judge Rincones granted the Defendant's request seeking to dismiss 

the indictment in this matter and to terminate and dismiss the prosecution of this matter 

by the State of Texas.” As of today, Guajardo has not refuted this assertion.

Having reviewed appellant’s motion, we hereby GRANT the motion.

We order all proceedings in trial court cause number 2017-DCR-02167 STAYED until 

further order of this Court or final disposition of this appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

15th day of January, 2021.
Table of Contents







Exhibit
32.01






Certification
of Principal Executive Officer






Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To






Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Harold Covert, President, Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented therein.









Date: October
      26, 2009
            /s/
      Harold CovertHarold
      Covert
              President,
      Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            11,326
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  18,776
<PP&E>                                             6,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                     3,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    33,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             13,335
<BONDS>                                              251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                              23
<OTHER-SE>                                         9,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      33,903
<SALES>                                            5,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  33,949
<CGS>                                              4,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      4,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  14,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    5,470
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (3,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                8,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (7,860)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         610
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.01


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1
------------
                                            ASPIN, INCORPORATED
                             2949 East Desert Inn Road, Suite 1
                                       Las Vegas, NV 89121-3607
                                           Tel:    831-601-7931
                                           Fax:    831-401-2340

                        LETTER OF CREDIT
February 12, 2001

To:  International Travel CD's, Inc.
        1357 S. Josephine St.
        Denver, CO 80210

Gentlemen:

Based upon our review of the Company's financial statements as of
March 31, 2001 as prepared by Cordovano and Harvey, P.C. and upon the
pledge of the Company's principal officers' stock in International
Travel CD's , Inc., we are pleased to extend a Line of Credit to the
Company.

Such Line of Credit shall be in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars
($50,000.00) and may be drawn upon from time-to-time.

Any amount(s) drawn down shall bear interest at the Prime Rate plus
four percentage points.

This initial term of this Line of Credit shall be for six months, and
may be renewable for three additional six month terms in our sole
discretion.

Within 48 hours of faxed request from Joshua Wolcott, President of
International Travel CD's, Inc., Aspin, Incorporated will provide
International Travel CD's with a certified check in the requested
amount.

Yours truly,

ASPIN INCORPORATED



By:__/s/Charles V. Fishel__________
Charles V. Fishel, President


Accepted by:

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL CD'S INC.


By: __/s/Joshua Wolcott_____________
Joshua Wolcott, President
#### Mathews Industries, Inc., Appellant, vs. Hurtgen Dairy Products Company, Respondent.

*October 16*

November *11, 1930.*

*492The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *George E. Robinson*of Oconomowoc, and for the respondent on that of *Vilas L. Rasmussen*of Oconomowoc.

RoseNBERRy, C. J.

If we were pressed to give a name to the legal relationship which existed between the plaintiff, the defendant, and the Oconomowoc Dairy Company in this case we should face difficulties. That, however, is not necessary. The defendant in this case permitted Neuman to conduct the business in the name used by it prior to Neuman’s connection with it and the use of which it resumed immediately after it dispossessed him. Whatever the relationship between Neuman and the defendant company was, it had never completely put him in possession because of his failure to make the down payment. The secretary of the company remained at least in joint control of the operation of the business. When the defendant dispossessed Neuman it terminated the contract, admitted that it had retaken the business with the unpaid bills, and promised to pay for the goods delivered. It accepted in the name of the Oconomo-woc Dairy Company two instalments delivered, and it pre - sumably had the benefit of all the goods delivered because Neuman, so far as the evidence shows, derived no benefit from the transaction he entered into with the defendant. Under these circumstances it is considered that the defendant is legally bound because it accepted the debt as its own and that its promise to pay was a promise to pay its own debt.

*By the Court.*— Judgment appealed from is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment as prayed in the complaint.
July 7 , 2015

Mr. Ryan Boucher

President

Michigan Aerial Videos, LLC

6186 Tanager Court

Kalamazoo, MI 49009

Dear Mr. Boucher

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 3 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0918 ), but

we are unable t o process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the in formation described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1st Quarter 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001003638
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,092
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                   126
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3
<PP&E>                                         32,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          645
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,249
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,407
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (18)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                393
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   393
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-22845-99, 333-22823-99, 333-52755-99,
333-33756-99 and 333-63154) of Pegasus Communications Corporation of our report
dated February 20, 2004, except for Note 3 as to which the date is April 15,
2005 and Note 4 as to which the date is May 13, 2005, relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

May 13, 2005