alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         168,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,466)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,440
<PP&E>                                       3,220,473
<DEPRECIATION>                               (204,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,428,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,925
<BONDS>                                      1,390,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,859,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,428,196
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,725
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (119,998)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,976)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (33,120)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,631
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.65


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, 
February 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    <bullet> The Commission will consider whether to approve the 2015 
budget of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and will 
consider the related annual accounting support fee for the Board under 
Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01955 Filed 1-29-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Inspection Manual

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - Manual Chapters
                  - Inspection Procedures

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Inspection Manual

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1988 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1988

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1730 18th Street in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Merle Haggard 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MERLE HAGGARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1730 18th Street in Bakersfield, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Merle Haggard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Merle 
Haggard Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**MedVest Holdings CorporationSignificant and Other Subsidiaries**

 
| **Name  of Subsidiary**                        | ** ** | **State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation  or Organization** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |       |                                                              |
| MedVest  Holdings Corp                         |       | Ohio                                                              |
| Medex, Inc.                               |       | Ohio                                                              |
| Medex  Medical, Inc.                      |       | Ohio                                                              |
| Medex  Cardio-Pulmonary Inc.                   |       | Ohio                                                              |
| Medex  de Mexico SA de CV                      |       | Mexico                                                            |
| Medex  de Costa Rica, Ltda.                    |       | Costa Rica                                                        |
| Medex  Canada, Inc.                       |       | Canada                                                            |
| Medex  Japan KK                                |       | Japan                                                             |
| Medex  Medical France SARL                     |       | France                                                            |
| Medex  EU SARL                                 |       | Luxembourg                                                        |
| Medex  Financial SARL                          |       | Luxembourg                                                        |
| Medex  Medical Espana SRL                      |       | Spain                                                             |
| Medex  Medical Ltd.                            |       | United Kingdom                                                    |
| Ashfield  Medical Systems Ltd.                 |       | Scotland                                                          |
| Medex  Medical GmbH                            |       | Switzerland                                                       |
| Medex  Do Brasil Productos Hospitalares, Ltda. |       | Brazil                                                            |
| Medex  Italia SRL                              |       | Italy                                                             |
| Medex  GmbH                                    |       | Germany                                                           |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                      State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation                     Percentage Owned
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                                               <C>
Commodore Solution
Technologies, Inc.                                   Delaware                                             100%

Commodore Separation
  Technologies, Inc.                                 Delaware                                              87%

Commodore CFC
  Technologies, Inc.                                 Delaware                                             100%

CFC Technologies, Inc.                               Ohio                                                 100%

Commodore Advanced
Sciences, Inc.*                                      New Mexico                                           100%

A.S. Environmental, Inc.*                            Delaware                                             100%

Commodore Laboratories, Inc.*                        Ohio                                                 100%

Commodore Remediation
  Technologies, Inc.*                                Delaware                                             100%

Commodore Government
  Environmental
  Technologies, Inc.*                                Delaware                                             100%

Commodore Technologies, Inc.*                        Ohio                                                 100%

Sandpiper Properties, Inc.*                          Ohio                                                 100%

Environmental Alternatives, Inc.*                    New Mexico                                           100%

Advanced Sciences Integrated
     Mexico, S.A. de C.V.*                           Mexico                                               100%

Advanced Sciences Integradas S.A.*                   Argentina                                            100%

CORT Technologies, Inc.*                             Delaware                                             100%

Commodore Refrigerant
  Technologies, Inc.                                 Delaware                                             100%

</TABLE>

-----------------------------

*  Wholly owned subsidiary of Commodore Solution Technologies, Inc.
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

iioaorabla Topl Xooro 

county Attorney 

calduell county 

Lookhart, Tour 

Dear Slrr 

, 

~08~ or baying right 

ror.publlo roadr? 

other queatlan. 

. 

or thla 

part as 

to the genrral run4 eql then to the 

rund?- 

aelary 
. 96 

Eonorable TomWorm --Pam 2 

Thlr dopartsoat hald in Oplnlon ila. O-413 the8 a 

Copairmlonon~ Cowt,doer not ham authority to pu?ohare right 

of 1~89 oat OS the general fund8 or the county or lev l ~ubllo 

laproruaaat tar, and ~8 the oron for thet pwgo8ea 

3 tho case of Carroll I. ?lllleaa, 202 8. Ur 304 

the Su&ae Court of Texas ezyreasly hold tbnt the Jury funi 

and other oonstltutloisl itada theroin designated ooaporod oi 

‘fund8 raised by teation ooalfl not be legally translrrrrd frm 

ona to aaothor, ant that Artiola 1630 Yernon(s tiotatwd Cl~ll 

Btatutos, ha8 l pplioatlon to speolal haamda eremtod by rtatutor 

acd mai riot ap~lioablo tp oOrmtitutiona1 tundr. The Court nant 

rurtbor acd kale lc the CerroU Car0 that SoOtloP 9, Art&ok 

a or tha Bteto Conrtltutioa not only plad)d l llmitatloa on 

t&m amouct of baaa whloh ml&t bs lerhd by any oountr ror 

the yurjmou tkeroir?. ummrated, but alao derigzatod end plaood 

a llmltatlon on tho amunt to be aapsntied, ic that tams r&hod 

for oco pqoes therein 6oflneG oould aot be-expende6 for my . 

othor purpoao. - 

Fe reape~tfully anmmr beta of the bbow stated quo@- 

bloas in tte cegatlre. 

Yours rery tndy 

BybdL i 

hrdoll rllllur 

Amrlrtmt 

i
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Reactor Oversight

### Filter by Document Type

 All                   - All
                  - Operating Reactors
                  - New Reactors

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - Reactor Oversight

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00151-CR

IN RE: JOSEPH D. SMITH

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph D. Smith has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to 

order Carolyn Parrott, the District Clerk of Upshur County, to file his “Writ of Nunc Pro Tunc.”1 

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over district clerks except when 

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re 

Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692–93 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (per 

curiam) (for district clerk to fall within jurisdictional reach of court of appeals, must establish 

that mandamus is necessary to enforce court of appeals’ jurisdiction). Smith has not alleged 

facts sufficient for the district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach.

For the reasons stated, we deny Smith’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: August 28, 2014

Date Decided: August 29, 2014

Do Not Publish

 1

The petition for writ of mandamus also names Lauren Parish, the 115th Judicial District Court Judge, and Billy W. 

Byrd, the Upshur County District Attorney, as respondents. The petition seeks relief only against Parrott.
HomeNRC LibraryLicensing Support Network (LSN) Library

# Additional Slides – LSNARP Meeting, Feb. 27-28, 2018

        - State of Nevada – Perspective
        - State of Nevada – ADAMS LSN Problem List
        - State of Nevada – A Path Forward for the LSN

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 09, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1998 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the six months ended December
31, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,266
<PP&E>                                       4,266,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               (200,142)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,082,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          818,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,196
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,119,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,264,378
<SALES>                                        238,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,288
<CGS>                                           77,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,842)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.006)
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Lessons Learned from Early Implementation of The Maintenance Rule at Nine Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-1526)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1526 (PDF - 1.78 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 1995**Date Published:** June 1995

C.D. Petrone, R.P. Correia, S.C. Black

Division of Technical Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes the lessons learned from the nine pilot site visits that were performed to review early implementation of the maintenance rule using the draft NRC Maintenance Inspection Procedure. Licensees followed NUMARC 93-01, "Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants." In general, the licensees were thorough in determining which structures, systems, and components (SSCs) were within the scope of the maintenance rule at each site. The use of an expert panel was an appropriate and practical method of determining which SSCs are risk significant. When setting goals, all licensees considered safety but many licensees did not consider operating experience throughout the industry. Although required to do so, licensees were not monitoring at the system or train level the performance or condition for some systems used in standby service but not significant to risk. Most licensees had not established adequate monitoring of structures under the rule. Licensees established reasonable plans for doing periodic evaluations, balancing unavailability and reliability, and assessing the effect of taking equipment out of service for maintenance. However, these plans were not evaluated because they had not been fully implemented at the time of the site visits.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2022-2





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of August 10, 2022 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 24 th day of March, 2023.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President, Financial Services