alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Ley.**~l~ha (?~~~W~l'tf**  

# . . 1• · · ·\! ·1, 1 

### I j 

### ,Kl

,**.,~,__,, ~**  I l d From:

_::..

## cT**OPERATIO~J:j** Frank Smith <kittyvalet@bendbroadband.com> 

### Sent· Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:23 PM 

### To: 

### [U

### i!. 

## ! Q 

## A iO: 

## ?41ey, Aloha (OST) 

### Subject:

-- Unnecessary grant request from the Central Oregon Air Service Team

June 24, 2012 To: ·Aloha Ley, Assoc. Director Dept. ofTransportation's air service grant program Re: Grant request from Roger Lee, Central Oregon Economic Developmentfor Central Oregon The local Chamber of Commerce has urged area citizens to flood your departmentwith requests for public money to provide air service from Redmond, OR (RDM) to LAX. Our airportwas doubled in size in the past few years during a period when Oregon's business climate deteriorated. The extent ofthat improvement was unfounded byeconomic conditions. Conditions in Oregon are even worse nowdue to unfunded public service pension accounts and future unaffordable energy rates due to eliminating high efficiency powerplants. The departure of AllegiantAirlines was caused by their unprofitable operation here. UnitedAirlines, through Sky West's regional, did provide service to L.:AX in better times than at present and also found little interest in that service. The LAX flights were then canceled. I have no reason to believe that demand for LAX service will be profitable for any carrier for manyyears to come. Thank you, Frank D. Smith P.E. (ret) 2932 SW Cascade Vista Drive Redmond, OR 97756 541/923-8304

1 

## ..
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffReport to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences (NUREG-0090)

# Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences – Fiscal Year 2017 (NUREG-0090, Volume 40)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0090, Volume 40 (PDF – 841 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2018**Date Published:** June 2018

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (Public Law 93-438), defines an abnormal occurrence (AO) as an unscheduled incident or event that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) determines to be significant from the standpoint of public health or safety. The Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-66) changed the AO reporting requirement from a quarterly basis to an annual one.

This report describes five events involving NRC licensees that the agency identified as AOs during fiscal year (FY) 2017 based on the criteria defined in the report's Appendix A, "Abnormal Occurrence Criteria and Guidelines for Other Events of Interest." All five AOs were medical events as defined in Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 35, "Medical Use of Byproduct Material." During this reporting period, no events at commercial nuclear power plants in the United States were identified as AOs.

In addition, this report describes six other medical events, as defined in 10 CFR Part 35 that occurred in Agreement States and were identified as AOs during FY 2017 based on the criteria defined in Appendix A. Agreement States are those States that have entered into formal agreements with the NRC, pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA) (Public Law 83-703), to regulate certain quantities of AEA material at facilities within their borders. Currently, there are 37 Agreement States.

Appendix A to this report presents the NRC's criteria for identifying AOs, as well as the guidelines for selecting "other events of interest." Appendix B, "Updates of Previously Reported Abnormal Occurrences," provides updated information for one event that was identified in the FY 2016 "Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences." The NRC identified one event during FY 2017 that met the guidelines for inclusion in Appendix C, "Other Events of Interest." Appendix D, "Glossary," defines terms used throughout this report. Appendix E, "Conversion Table," presents conversions commonly used when calculating doses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Bias Estimates Used in Lieu of Validation of Fission Products and Minor Actinides in MCNP Keff Calculations for PWR Burnup Credit Casks (NUREG/CR-7205, ORNL/TM-2012/544)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7205 (PDF - 1.34 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2014**Date Published:** September 2015

**Prepared by:** D. E. Mueller, W. J. Marshall, D. G. Bowen, and J. C. Wagner

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

A. Barto, Project Manager

NRC Job Code J5728

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Spent Fuel Management issued Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) 8, Revision 3 in September 2012. This ISG provides guidance for NRC Staff review of burnup credit analyses supporting transport and dry storage of pressurized water reactor spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in casks. ISG-8, Rev. 3 includes, among other things, guidance for addressing validation of criticality (*keff*) calculations crediting the presence of a limited set of fission products and minor actinides (FP&MA). Based on previous work documented in NUREG/CR-7109, ISG-8, Rev. 3 includes a recommendation to accept use of 1.5 or 3% of the FP&MA worth, depending on the criticality code and cross-section data used, to conservatively account for the bias and bias uncertainty associated with the selected insufficiently validated FP&MAs. This bias is applied in addition to the bias and bias uncertainty resulting from validation of *keff* calculations for the major actinides in SNF. The work described in this report involves comparison of FP&MA worths calculated using SCALE and Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) with Evaluated Nuclear Data Files, Part B–V, –VI, and –VII based nuclear data. The comparison supports use of the 1.5% FP&MA worth bias when either SCALE or MCNP codes are used for criticality calculations, provided the other conditions of ISG-8, Rev. 3, Recommendation 4 are met. The additional conditions include that the cask design is similar to the hypothetical generic burnup credit-32 cask model and that the credited FP&MA worth is no more than 0.1 Δ*keff*.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No: 19-060 December 2, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC to Hold Public Meeting Seeking Comment on

Environmental Review for SHINE Operating License

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Janesville, Wis., on Dec. 12, to hear the 

public’s views on environmental issues the agency should consider in reviewing SHINE Medical 

Technologies’ application for a license to operate its medical isotope production facility, currently 

under construction.

The NRC will hold the meeting at the Celtic House at Glen Erin Golf Club, 1417 West Airport 

Road in Janesville, from 6-8 p.m. Staff presentations will describe the environmental and safety

review processes. The presentations will be followed by a formal public comment session. An NRC 

open house, from 5-6 p.m., will provide members of the public the opportunity to speak informally 

with agency staff.

Those who want to register in advance to comment at the meeting or who have special needs for 

attending or presenting information should contact Jennifer Davis at 301-415-3835 or via e-mail at 

jennifer.davis@nrc.gov by Dec. 5. Those who want to speak can also register in person by 5:45 p.m

the day of the meeting. Individual comments could be limited by the time available and the number 

of people registered to speak.

NRC staff will also consider written comments on environmental issues until Jan. 13, 2020, 

following the publication of a notice in the Federal Register. Please include Docket ID NRC-2019-

0173 with your comment, via the regulations.gov website.

The NRC issued SHINE the construction permit for the medical isotope production facility in 

February 2016. SHINE submitted the operating license application in July 2019 and the NRC 

accepted the application for a full review in October. The application, less proprietary details, is 

available on the NRC website. In addition, the Hedberg Public Library, at 

316 South Main St., in Janesville, has agreed to maintain a copy of the application’s environmental 

report for public inspection.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert M.
Dennerlein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: February 14, 2005
                                                /s/ Robert M. Dennerlein
                                                ------------------------
                                                Robert M. Dennerlein
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53420-53421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21846]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2011-OS-0097]

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice to Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
September 26, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
of make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are

[[Page 53421]]

received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler, Chief Privacy and FOIA 
Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. 
Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221, or by phone at 
(703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The specific changes to the record system being amended are set 
forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its 
entirety. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports.

    Dated: August 22, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Proposed Deletion Notice for S810.50 DLA-P

S810.50 DLA-P

System name:
    Contracting Officer Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10854).

Reason:
    Records are covered by existing Office of Personnel Management 
(OPM) government-wide Privacy Act systems of records. OPM has 
government-wide responsibility for various systems of records 
maintained on Federal civilian employees.

[FR Doc. 2011-21846 Filed 8-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
HomeNuclear SecurityRadioactive Material SecurityIntegrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP)National Source Tracking System (NSTS)

# Training and Help Desk Support for the National Source Tracking System

The National Source Tracking System (NSTS) is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly. Nonetheless, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) offered training sessions at several locations around the country for licensees interested in using the online method for reporting. For those unable to attend the training sessions, the NSTS offers a number of tools, including computer-based training, application help, a users' guide, and tools for navigating through the system. The Frequently Asked Questions About the National Source Tracking System also provide useful information.

In addition, the NRC has established a Help Desk to assist users by answering questions and resolving issues related to credentialing, login procedures, system use, transaction reporting, and any problems encountered in using the NSTS. Users may also contact the Help Desk to submit system change requests (to remedy defects or enhance functionality). Each inquiry is logged and tracked for future reference. Help Desk availability is as follows:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - National Source Tracking System: Blog
          - NSTS Overview
          - Background
          - Get Credentialed to Access NSTS
          - How to Report to NSTS
          - Resources  for Online Reporting
          - NSTS Expansion
          - Annual Inventory Reconciliation
          - NSTS Presentations
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Help Desk Support
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vsource, Inc. (the registrant) for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Phillip E. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 14, 2004



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Phillip E. Kelly         
|    |  | Phillip E. Kelly             
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



This certification accompanies this
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it
by reference.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report - Fiscal Year 2013 (NUREG-1542, Volume 19)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 19 (PDF - 9.66 MB)
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 19, Supplement 1 (PDF - 1.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: December 2013

Division of Planning and Budget Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Performance and Accountability Report is an account of the agency's effectiveness in achieving its mission during Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. The report describes the agency's program and financial management performance during FY 2013, which covers the period from October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2013.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-132181 and No. 333-159750) and S-8 (No. 333-132170, No. 333-123271, No. 333-117619, No. 333-143303,No. 333-147064, No. 333-150294, No. 333-157727 and No. 333-162765) of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2010, except as to Note 15, which is as of March 19, 2010, relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 23, 2010
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 7 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 96-1499
v. (D. Colorado) KERI PORTER, also known as Blacky, Defendant - Appellant. (D.C. No. 96-CR-86-Z)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , HENRY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Keri Porter entered a conditional guilty plea to th e charge of possession with the intent to distribute crack cocaine and was sentenced to 57 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release. T he single issue on appeal is whether the penalty disparity between powder and cr ack cocaine as provided in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1 is constitution al. In particular, the Defendant asserts that the penalty provisions are r acially discriminatory in violation of the equal protection and due process c lauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and are void for vagueness. Appellant’s Br. at 5. In raising this issue, the Defendant openly acknowl edges that this circuit has consistently upheld the penalty disparity betwe en powder and crack cocaine in the face of constitutional challenges, and asserts the only reason for bringing the issue yet again before this court is to preserve th e issue for possible review by the United States Supreme Court. Appellant’s Br. at 5. It is the law of this circuit that the penalty prov isions outlined in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1 are constitutional. S ee United States v. Williamson , 53 F.3d 1500, 1503 (10th Cir. 1995) (holding that USSG § 2D1.1 is not violative of equal protection); United States v . Ashley , 26 F.3d 1008, 1013 (10th Cir. 1994) (holding that the penalty disparity between powder and crack cocaine does not violate due process or equal prote ction); United States v.-3-

Thurmond , 7 F.3d 947, 951-52 (10th Cir. 1993) (holding thatpenalty disparity between powder and crack cocaine does not violate due process and was not enacted for a discriminatory purpose); United State s v. Easter , 981 F.2d 1549, 1557-59 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1 do not violate equal protection and are not void fo r vagueness); United States v. Turner , 928 F.2d 956, 960 (10th Cir. 1991) (holding that penalty disparity between powder and crack cocaine does not violate due process). Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district c ourt is AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge