alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________ 

No. 20-2904 

___________________________ 

Jose Luis Elias-Huinac 

 Petitioner

v. 

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States

 Respondent

____________ 

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ 

Submitted: April 08, 2021 

Filed: April 13, 2021

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________ 

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Jose Luis Elias-Huinac petitions for review of an order of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen proceedings. 

Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court finds no basis for reversal. 
-2- 

 This court concludes that Elias-Huinac’s due process claim is without merit. 

See Alva-Arellano v. Lynch, 811 F.3d 1064, 1066 (8th Cir. 2016) (to establish due 

process violation, noncitizen must demonstrate both fundamental procedural error, 

and prejudice); Nunez-Portillo v. Holder, 763 F.3d 974, 977 (8th Cir. 2014) (no 

constitutionally protected liberty interest in discretionary remedy of cancellation of 

removal). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Elias-Huinac’s untimely 

motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed 

within 90 days of entry of final order of removal); Vargas v. Holder, 567 F.3d 387, 

391 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
#### Long and others, Respondents, vs. Wallmow and others, Defendants: Scanlan and another, Appellants.

*January 10*

February *15, 1938.*

*661' For the appellants there was a brief by *Sanborn, Blake & Aberg*of Madison, and *Young, Everson, Ryan & Hanaway*of Green Bay, and oral argument by *Ernest H. Pett*of Madison and *E. L. Everson.*

Nelson, J.

When the cause was called for argument on January 10, 1938, the appellants were present by their attorneys. The respondents were not. No brief having been *662filed or submitted by the respondents, the order appealed from is reversed under Rule 32, which provides:

> “When a cause is submitted or presented by counsel for appellant or plaintiff in error, but not by the opposing party, the judgment or order appealed from may be reversed as of course, without argument.”

*By the Court.*

That part of the order appealed from is reversed.
---

Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I,
William J. Pennstrom, Jr., M.A., do hereby consent to the filing of the written
disclosure regarding the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report
on the Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in
the Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual
Information Form of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated
August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ William Pennstrom Jr.
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     | William J. Pennstrom, Jr.
| |     | QPMMSA, SME              
| |     | Pennstrom Consulting Inc.

---
No. 91-735.

#### Cohen *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1923 

To prohibit the use of members of the United States Armed Forces to 

carry out offensive combat operations in Syria. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of members of the United States Armed 

Forces to carry out offensive combat operations in Syria. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF MEMBERS OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES TO CARRY 

5 OUT OFFENSIVE COMBAT OPERATIONS IN 

6 SYRIA. 

7 The President may not use members of the Armed 

8 Forces of the United States to carry out offensive combat 

9 operations in Syria unless Congress has enacted a specific 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1923 IH

1 authorization for such use of members of the Armed 

2 Forces. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of Rimfire Minerals Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason S. Weber, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   ­­­­/s/ Jason S. Weber  Name: Jason S. Weber Title: Chief Executive Officer May 20, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.        EXHIBIT 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of Rimfire Minerals Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dorothy G. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   ­­­­/s/ Dorothy G. Miller  Name: Dorothy G. Miller Title: Chief Financial Officer May 20, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 82-5975.

#### Karkenny *v.*Maryland.

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**








Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FMB Equibanc, Inc. (the
      "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
      Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated
                March 27, 2006
            By:/s/
                Charles R. NessmithCharles
                R. NessmithChief
                Executive Officer
**NUMBER 13-14-00026-CV**

**COURT OF APPEALS**

**THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

**CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG**

****

**IN RE THOMAS GARCIA AND STEPHANIE JEFFERSON**

**AND ALL OCCUPANTS**

****

**On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.**

****

**ORDER**

**Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria**

**Order Per Curiam**

Relators, Thomas Garcia and Stephanie Jefferson and all occupants, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on January 15, 2014, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in striking relator’s supplemental answer and affidavit raising the issue of the court’s jurisdiction as untimely filed.  The Court requests that the real party, Green Tree Servicing LLC, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.  *See*TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.  

IT IS SO ORDERED.		

								PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

16th day of January, 2014.

2

# image1.wmf
No. 91-6201.

#### Diaz-Valenzuela *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Kenneth T. Koehler, President and, subject to regulatory approval, Chief
Executive Officer and Marcus Faust, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Metropolitan Financial Corp. (the "Company") each certify in his
capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and that to
his knowledge:

         (1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: October 22, 2002                    /s/Kenneth T. Koehler
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Kenneth T. Koehler,
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 22, 2002                    /s/Marcus Faust
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Marcus Faust,
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
No: I-19-012 May 21, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Schedules Webinar to Discuss 2018 Safety Performance 

at Pennsylvania Nuclear Power Plants 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public webinar on June 12 to discuss 

the agency’s annual assessment of safety performance at the nuclear power plants located in 

Pennsylvania. Beaver Valley 1 & 2, in Shippingport, are operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating 

Company; and Susquehanna 1 & 2, in Berwick, are operated by Talen Energy. Limerick 1 & 2, in 

Limerick, Peach Bottom 2 & 3, in Delta, and Three Mile Island Unit 1 in Middletown, are operated 

by Exelon Nuclear.

The purpose of the webinar is to provide information regarding the plants’ safety 

performance in 2018 and the NRC’s oversight activities at the facilities. The online meeting is 

scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. Participants will be able to view slides prepared by NRC staff and 

ask questions either orally or in writing via a web page established to host the session. Advance 

online registration is required to participate.

All of the units operated safely in 2018. For Beaver Valley, Limerick, Three Mile Island and 

Susquehanna, at the end of the year, all inspection findings and performance indicators were green, 

or of very low safety significance. As a result, the plants will receive the normal level of oversight 

in 2019, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC determined the performance at Peach Bottom was within the Regulatory Response 

Column, the second highest performance column of the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process Action 

Matrix due to a white finding (low to moderate safety significance). The finding was related to 

performance issues that caused a shared emergency diesel generator to be declared inoperable last 

June. In addition to baseline inspections, the NRC is conducting a supplemental inspection to ensure 

that the root and contributing causes of degraded performance are understood and that appropriate 

corrective actions are taken.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

describe plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC

oversight.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors assigned to each of the plants and 

specialists from the agency’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa. The annual assessment letters 
Page | 2

for Beaver Valley, Limerick, Peach Bottom, Susquehanna and Three Mile Island, as well as the 

webinar notice, are available on the NRC website. Current plant performance information for all of 

the units is also available on the website and updated quarterly.
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE**

 

**BYLAWS**

 

**OF**

 

**PACIFICA BANCORP, INC.**

 

Article 2, Section 1 of the Bylaws of Pacifica Bancorp, Inc. is amended as follows: 

 

Section 1. Annual Meetings. The annual meeting of the shareholders of this corporation, for the purpose ofelection of directors and for such other business as may come before it, shall be held either (a) at the principal office of the corporation, on or before the last day of May of each and every year, or (b) at such other place and time in the countyof the principal office or any branch office of the corporation, as may be determined by the board of directors and specified in the notice of the meeting. 

 

ADOPTED this 23rd day of October, 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     129,043,463
<SECURITIES>                                13,492,147
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,124,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                   785,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,470,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,586,866
<PP&E>                                     114,186,789
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,101,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             316,151,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,860,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,983
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,858,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               316,151,457
<SALES>                                      9,381,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,381,265
<CGS>                                        6,432,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,573,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,049,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,809,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,809,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,809,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 10.2****SALES COMPENSATION PLAN**SALES COMPENSATION PLAN FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF WORLDWIDE SALES****FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007**     The current Vice President of Worldwide Sales (the *“**VP of Worldwide Sales**”)*of SiliconImage, Inc. (the *“**Company**”)*will receive a cash payment based on the percentage of achievement ofthe quota goal for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, as set forth in the table below.         **Percent**    **Achievement of** **Amount of Cash** **Percent of Incentive****Planned Revenue** **Incentive Payment** **Target Amount**70% $98,000   70.00%75% $105,000   75.00%80% $112,000   80.00%85% $119,000   85.00%90% $126,000   90.00%95% $133,000   95.00%100% $140,000   100.00%105% $176,250   125.89%110% $234,250   167.32%115% $306,750   219.11%120% $379,250   270.89%125% $451,750   322.68%130% $524,250   374.46%135% $596,750   426.25%140% $669,250   478.04%145% $741,750   529.82%150% $814,250   581.61%No amounts are payable if the VP of Worldwide Sales  achieves less than seventy percent (70%)of his quota goal. A cash incentive payment in the amount of $98,000 is payable to the VP ofWorldwide Sales upon achievement of seventy percent (70%) of his quota goal. An incremental cashincentive payment is payable to the VP of Worldwide Sales in the amount of $1,400 for eachincremental percentage point of his quota goal achieved between seventy one percent (71%) and onehundred percent (100%). Thereafter, an incremental cash incentive payment is payable in the amountof $7,250 for each incremental percentage point of his quota goal achieved between one hundred onepercent (101%) and one hundred seven percent (107%). An incremental cash incentive payment ispayable in the amount of $14,500 for each incremental percentage point of his quota goal achievedover one hundred seven percent (107%). The amount of cash incentive payment payable under this Planis not capped. Actual amounts between the percentage point shown in the table above will becalculated on pro-rata basis.For 2007 only, the company is guaranteeing minimum cash payments to the VP of Worldwide Sales forthe second quarter (three month period ending June 30) and third quarter (three month period endingSeptember 30) assuming achievement of one hundred percent (100%) of the quota goals for suchperiods; provided, however, that the cash payment for the second quarter will be prorated beginningApril 23, 2007 (the date that the VP of Worldwide Sales assumed the position) thru the end of thesecond quarter. The fourth quarter (period ending December 31) will be paid based on actualresults.
 **
No. 85-2001.

#### Evans *v.*Arkansas.

Ct. App. Ark. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LEONARD LEWIS BROWNING

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 187

- C R

Appeal from the

426 th District Court

of Bell C ounty, Texas

(TC# 74768 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record.

The motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Bell County District Clerk

forward a copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record, and any supplemental

, to the

Appellant, Leonard Lewis Browning, 4502 Kind Way, Austin, Texas, 78725

. Appellant is

directed to notify the Court within thirty days whether he intends to file a brief. It is further

ORDERED that the record shall be returned to the Bell County District Clerk after Appellant’s

brief is filed or further order of the Court . The District Clerk is directed to notify the Court in

writing of the date o n which the record was forwarded to the Appellan t for his use.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of September , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Implementation Guidance for 10 CFR Part 37, "Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material" (NUREG-2155)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, April 04, 2022
National Archives and Records Administration

Office of the Federal Register

FEB I 3 2007

Ms. Nancy Molitor

Regulations Division' (AGC-200)

Office of the Chief Counsel

Federal Aviation A-dministrat.ion;-ribT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The matenallisted In the attachment IS approved for incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 39.

This approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publicarion(s) is effective on the effective date aryour

final rule. If yon wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me in writing of the change.

Sincerely,

R MOND A. MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attorney: ~

Attachment

.

u.s. mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 21J740.Q()()1

Offic~ location: 800 North Capitol SLIeet,NW, Suite 700, Washington, rx: 200024244

Federal Register web sites: http://wl..IT\.Il.(lJchives.gov/ federal-register and http://,vww.gpoi1CCess.gov/niUa
Incorporation by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2006-24036; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-04-AD; Amdl. 39-14947; AD 2007-04-15

Sicma Aero Seal Service Bulletin No. 90- Issue 2

25-005 and Annex 1,

Issue 1 dated March

31,1999

dated March 31,1999

Docket No. FAA-2006-25470; DireclorateJdelllijier 2006-NM-090-AD; Amdl. 39-14942; AD 2007-04-10

Boeing Alert Service BulleUn

747-25A3353

dOlled December 9, 2004

Docket No. FAA-2006-25637; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-43-AD; Amelt. 39-14939; AD 2007-04-08

EADS SOCATA T6M Aira<llt Mandatory Service

Bulletin S8 7(}-131,

ATA No. 53

dated July 2005

Docket No. FAA-2006-25892; Directorate Identijier 2006-NM-120-AD; Amdt. 39-14941; AD 2007-04-09

EMBRAER

EMBAAER

Service Bulletin 145·30- Revision 2

0043

Service Bulletin

145LEG-30-0013

dOlled May 25, 2006

dated June 28, 2005

Docket No. FAA.-2006-25926; Directorate Identifier 2000-CE-17-AD; Amdl. 39-14946; AD 2003-17-05 R/

Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51- Revision NO.8

51

dated July 5, 2006

Docket No. FAA-2006-26235; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-65-AD; Amelf. 39-14945,- AD 2007-04-13

EADS SOCATA T8M Aircraft Mandatory Service

Bulletin S8 7(}-130,

ATA No. 32

dOlled January 2006

Docket No. FAA-2007-27/74.- Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-006-AD; Amdl. 39-14944; AD 2007-04-/2

Gippsland Aeronautics

Printed 11912007

Mandalory Service Issue 4

Bullelin SB-GA8-2002-

02

dOlled January 4, 2007

Pagclofl