alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests

# Recent FOIA Requests for 2024

The following pages present chronological listings of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Requests submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during each month of the current fiscal year. These listings include the subject and reference number of each request. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 3, 2024
#### Anderson, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Hall, Baker & Hall*of Madison.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *Orland S'. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents Plighway Trailer Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: *Otjen & Otjen*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
No. 90-6316.

#### Sardina *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Smalls, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1004]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status. Because defendant was convicted of armed felonies *(see,*CPL 1.20 [41]; Penal Law § 70.02), he was eligible for youthful offender status only if the court found "mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed” (CPL 720.10 [3] [i]; [2] [a] [ii]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Griffith, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 26, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 13

- 00844

- CV
IN RE CALVIN ERVIN M CNAC , Relator On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F03

- 71678

- T
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for

acc ess to the trial record. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not
recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a); Simo n v. Levario , 306 S.W.3d 318,
320

- 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator = s petition for
writ of mandamus.

130844F.P05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cach Foods, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB  for  the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cornelius A. Hofman,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.




                         /s/Cornelius  A.  Hofman
                         -------------------------
                         Cornelius  A.  Hofman
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         March  27,  2003
#### DEN EX DEM. JESSE SNELL & OTHERS vs. RICHARD YOUNG.

June 1843

Where, in a deed for land, a life estate only is mentioned in the *premises*and *habendum,*this cannot be enlarged into a fee, either by a warranty in fee .or by a covenant for quiet enjoyment to the grantee and his heirs.

The case of *Roberts*v *Forsythe,*3 Dev. Rep. 26, cited and approved-

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Hyde County, at Spring Term, 1843, his Honor Judge Bailey presiding.

The facts of the case, so far as they relate to the point decided in this court, are sufficiently stated in the opinion-of the judge.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

*J. II. Dry an*for the defendant.

Daniel, J.

The lessor of the plaintiff claimed title to the land in dispute under a deed to his grand-father, John Mason, from David Jones, dated in 1793. In the *premises*of the said deed, Jones appears to “ bargain, sell, set over and assign unto the said John Mason, a certain tract of land, &c.” The words “ and his heirs,” are not snperadded to the name of John Mason. The said words (his heirs,) are also wanting in the *habendum*clause of the deed. But the covenant of warranty in the said deed is thus: “I, David Jones, do covenant and agree to and with the said John Mason to warrant and forever defend the aforesaid premises from me, my heirs and assigns unto him the said John Mason, *his heirs*and assigns forever.” The words, *heirs of*
      *380
      *the grantee,*are in no part of the deed, except in the clause °f warranty. From what appears in the *premises*and *hab-endnm*of the deed, John Mason had but a life estate in the jan(j_ And a life estate is not enlarged into a fee, either by a warranty in fee, or by a covenant for quiet enjoyment to the grantee and his heirs. *Den ex Dem. Roberts v Forsythe,*3 Dev. Rep. 26. *Seymour's case,*10 Co. Rep. 97. The ancestor, John Mason, had but a life estate in the land; the lessor of the plaintiff therefore never had any interest in the same which he could lease.

There are several circumstances stated in the case, from which, perhaps, it might be argued, that the defendant is estopped to deny the seizure in fee of John Mason. But we do not consider them at all, because the verdict is found subject to the opinion of the court on certain points, beyond which we have not thought ourselves at liberty to go.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Airmen and Soldiers Optimize Mission Readiness by Enhancing the Army’s Combatives Program

By Capt. Adan Cazarez 94th Army Air and Missile Defense Command

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Measures of Risk Importance and Their Applications (NUREG/CR-3385,  BMI-2103)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3385 (PDF - 3.08 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1983**Date Published:**July 1983

**Prepared by:** W.E. Vesely, T.C. Davis, R.S. Denning, N. Saltos  Battelle Columbus Laboratories 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN B-2386

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objectives of this work are to evaluate the importance of the containment and the different safety functions as assessed in probabilistic risk-analyses. To accomplish this objective, risk importance measures are defined to evaluate a feature's importance in further reducing the risk and its, importance in maintaining the present risk level. One defined importance measure, called the feature's risk reduction worth, is useful for prioritizing feature improvements which can most reduce the risk. The other defined importance, called the feature's risk achievement worth, is useful for prioritizing features which are most important in reliability assurance and maintenance activities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Analysis of Ultimate-Heat-Sink Spray Ponds (NUREG-0733)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0733 (PDF - 15.06 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1981**Date Published:**August 1981

Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report develops models which can be utilized in the design of certain types of spray ponds used in ultimate heat sinks at nuclear power plants, and ways in which the models may be employed to determine the design basis required by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.27.

The models of spray-pond performance are based on heat and mass transfer characteristics of drops in an environment whose humidity and velocity have been modified by the presence of the sprays. Drift loss from the sprays is estimated by a ballistics model.

The pond performance model is used first to scan a long-term weather record from a representative meteorological station in order to determine the periods of most adverse meteorology for cooling or evaporation. The identified periods are used in subsequent calculations to actually estimate the design-basis pond temperature. Additionally, methods are presented to correlate limited quantities of onsite data to the longer offsite record, and to estimate the recurrence interval of the design-basis meteorology chosen.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Environmental Impact Statement for the Reclamation of the Sequoyah Fuels Corporation Site in Gore, Oklahoma (NUREG-1888)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1888 (PDF - 50.7 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2008**Date Published:**May 2008

Division of Waste Management and Environmental ProtectionOffice of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management ProgramsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Sequoyah Fuels Corporation (SFC) is proposing to conduct reclamation activities at its 243-hectare (600-acre) former uranium conversion site in Gore, Oklahoma, in accordance with Title 10, "Energy," of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 40 (10 CFR Part 40), Appendix A (which includes criteria for the disposition of uranium mill tailings or wastes). In its *Reclamation Plan* submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), SFC proposes to consolidate contaminated sludges and soils, demolish existing structures (with the exception of the administration building and the electrical substation), and construct an above-grade, onsite engineered disposal cell for the permanent disposal of all contaminated materials. SFC also would implement its proposed groundwater *Corrective Action Plan* to restore the groundwater using the "hydraulic containment and pump back" method. Following the completion of surface reclamation and groundwater corrective actions, SFC would seek termination of its NRC license. As part of that future license termination process, SFC proposes the transfer of approximately 131 hectares (324 acres) of the site, including the land area encompassing the disposal cell and a surrounding buffer, to the custody of the United States or the State of Oklahoma for long-term control. SFC proposes that the remaining 112 hectares (276 acres) of the site be released for unrestricted use by members of the public.

This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and NRC's regulations for implementing the Act, found at 10 CFR Part 51. This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and its reasonable alternatives. This EIS also describes the environment potentially affected by SFC's proposed site reclamation activities, presents and compares the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed action and its alternatives, and describes SFC's environmental monitoring program and proposed mitigation measures.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22347]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8472]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Cercle et Carr[eacute] and the International Spirit 
of Abstract Art''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Cercle et Carr[eacute] and the 
International Spirit of Abstract Art,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Georgia Museum of Art, Athens, 
Georgia, from on or about October 12, 2013, until on or about January 
5, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: September 5, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-22347 Filed 9-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
DENY and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00435-CV 

IN RE BRENDA L. CADDELL, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-13738 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

In her May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator Brenda Caddell 

challenges the trial court’s (1) ruling sustaining the denial of her objection to the 

visiting judge, and (2) refusal to reconsider the enforcement motion that the visiting 

judge had denied. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the 

trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate 

remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) 

(citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding)). 
 –2– 

Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator 

has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ 

of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Schenck, J., dissenting. 

220435F.P05 

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE
Washington Bancorp
Computation of Earnings per Common Share

                                                                      Exhibit 11


<TABLE>
                                                     For the three months ended March 31,      For the nine months ended March 31,
                                                     -------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
                                                      2001      2000       2001      2000      2001      2000       2001      2000
                                                      Basic     Basic    Diluted   Diluted     Basic     Basic    Diluted   Diluted
                                                       EPS       EPS       EPS       EPS        EPS       EPS       EPS       EPS
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>         <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Computation of weighted average
      number of common shares
      outstanding:
Common shares outstanding
      at the beginning of the period ............    651,133    651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133
Unreleased common shares held by the
      Employee Stock Ownership
      Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
      of the period .............................    (30,848)   (35,718)  (30,848) (35,718)   (33,283)  (37,972)  (33,283)  (37,972)
Weighted average common shares
      released by the ESOP during
      the period ................................        657        609       657      609      1,875     1,736     1,875     1,736
Weighted average common shares
      outstanding - Stock Option Plan ...........         --         --     8,173    6,786         --        --     7,013     9,179
Weighted average common shares
      into treasury .............................   (136,162)   (74,261) (136,162) (74,261)  (121,903)  (60,182) (121,903)  (60,182)
                                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total average shares outstanding ................    484,780    541,763   492,953  548,549    497,822   554,715   504,835   563,894
                                                    ===============================================================================

Net income ......................................   $281,808  $ 285,278  $281,808 $285,278   $785,215  $786,554  $785,215  $786,554
                                                    ===============================================================================

Net income per share ............................   $   0.58  $    0.53  $   0.57 $   0.52   $   1.58  $   1.42  $   1.56  $   1.39
                                                    ===============================================================================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                       AMENDMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT OF
                           HEART HOSPITAL OF DTO, LLC

         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Operating Agreement (the
"Operating Agreement") of Heart Hospital of DTO, LLC (the "Company") is made and
entered pursuant to Section 11.2 of the Operating Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the Members desire to amend the Operating Agreement in
accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency which is hereby acknowledged, the Members agree as follows:

         1.       The following provision is hereby inserted as the third
paragraph of Section 8.4 of the Operating Agreement:

                  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event
         that no later than December 31, 2001 MedCath Holdings, Inc. ("MHI") or
         one of MHI's Affiliates conducts an underwritten public offering of the
         common stock of MHI or its Affiliate pursuant to an effective
         registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as then in
         effect, and MHI or MHI's Affiliate offers shares of its common stock or
         cash to any Member in exchange for such Member's Membership Interest or
         a portion thereof (the "Exchange"), MHI and its Affiliates and the
         Member may, notwithstanding the terms of this Agreement, engage in such
         Exchange upon such terms as the Member and MHI or MHI's Affiliate may
         mutually agree, and the Exchange shall not be subject to any
         restrictions on the transfer of Membership Interests or rights of first
         refusal of the Company or of any other Member set forth in this
         Agreement, including, but not limited to, those restrictions set forth
         in this Section 8.4.

         2.       All terms not defined herein shall have the meaning provided
therefor in the Operating Agreement.

         3.       Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions
of the Operating Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         4.       This Amendment shall be effective when approved by the Members
in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Operating Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members have approved and consented to this
Amendment as of the 12th day of April, 2001.