alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Assessment of the Relevance of Displacement Bases Design Methods/Criteria to Nuclear Plant Structures (NUREG/CR-6719)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6719 (PDF 6.10 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2001**Date Published:** July 2001

**Prepared by:** Y. K. Wang, C. A. Miller, C. H. Hofmayer

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

J. F. Costello, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6245

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objective of the work described in this report is to evaluate the extent to which displacement based methods may be useful to evaluate the seismic response of nuclear power station structures. A literature review of displacement based seismic design methods was completed during the first phase of the project. As a result of this review it was decided to investigate the displacement based method outlined in FEMA 273 by applying it to two structures.

The first structure considered was a four story reinforced concrete building with shear walls. FEMA 273 pushover analysis methods were compared with nonlinear time history analysis and response spectrum analysis including ductility factors. The comparisons show that the FEMA analysis results are comparable to those achieved with the current force based methods.

The second structure analyzed was the Diablo Canyon nuclear power station turbine building. The main portion of this building is a reinforced concrete shear wall building that contains the turbine. The turbine is mounted on a pedestal which is a reinforced concrete frame structure. It is separately founded from the building and separated from the building by gaps at the operating floor. These gaps close under large earthquakes resulting in geometric nonlinearities. The results predicted with the FEMA analysis are found to compare poorly with nonlinear time history analyses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter K. Stevenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

          

Date: May 10, 2006 

|   |                                                                                                         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Peter K. Stevenson                                                                                       |   |
|   |  

 

Peter K. Stevenson

 

 

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

  |
# L_2015332EN.01014401.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/144

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/2397

of 16 December 2015

appointing a Spanish member and a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Paulino RIVERO BAUTE. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Paulino RIVERO BAUTE.

| (3) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Javier GONZALEZ ORTIZ, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Javier GONZALEZ ORTIZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| (a) | as member:






  — | D. Fernando CLAVIJO BATLLE, Presidente del Gobierno de Canarias, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

D. Fernando CLAVIJO BATLLE, Presidente del Gobierno de Canarias,

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Da Maria Luisa de MIGUEL ANASAGASTI, Directora General de Asuntos Económicos con la Unión Europea del Gobierno de Canarias. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Da Maria Luisa de MIGUEL ANASAGASTI, Directora General de Asuntos Económicos con la Unión Europea del Gobierno de Canarias.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

For the Council

The President

C. DIESCHBOURG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
July, 13 2015

Attn: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: STEVEN LIGHTCAP JR AND AARON BAUM OF ELITE DRONE SERVICES LLC. REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 and Blade 350 QX3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 33 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Steven Lightcap Jr

- Operator

Elite Drone Services LLC

11532 Crescent Pines Blvd.

Clermont, FL 34711

352

- 267

- 9132

EliteDroneServices @yahoo.com

Aaron Bau m

- Operator

Elite Drone Services LLC

352

- 572

- 9993

EliteDroneServices@yahoo.com
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35346-35347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14480]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9015-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

[[Page 35347]]

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements.
Filed 06/09/2014 Through 06/13/2014.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140171, Draft EIS,WAPA, NE, Interconnection of the Grande 
Prairie Wind Farm, Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2014, Contact: Rod 
O'Sullivan 720-962-7260.

EIS No. 20140172, Draft EIS, USACE, OR, Double-crested Cormorant 
Management Plan to Reduce Predation of Juvenile Salmonids in the 
Columbia River Estuary, Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2014, Contact: 
Sondra Ruckwardt 503-808-4510.

EIS No. 20140173, Final EIS, USFS, OR, Wolf Fuels and Vegetation 
Management Project, Review Period Ends: 07/28/2014, Contact: Jeff 
Marszal 541-416-6436.

EIS No. 20140174, Final EIS, USAF, NH, Second Main Operating Base KC-
46A Beddown at Alternative Air National Guard Installations, Review 
Period Ends: 07/21/2014, Contact: Kevin Marek 240-612-8855.

EIS No. 20140175, Draft EIS, FERC, TX, Corpus Christi LNG Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2014, Contact: Kandi Barakat 202-502-6365.

EIS No. 20140176, Final EIS, USACE, LA, Calcasieu Lock, Louisiana 
Feasibility Study, Review Period Ends: 07/21/2014, Contact: Timothy K. 
George 314-331-8459.

    Amended Notice:

EIS No. 20140167, Final EIS, USACE, HI, Honolulu Seawater Air 
Conditioning Project, Review Period Ends: 07/28/2014, Contact: Ryan 
Winn 808-835-4309.
    Revision to the FR Notice Published 6/13/2014; Correct Review 
Period from 7/14/2014 to 07/28/214.

    Dated: June 17, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-14480 Filed 6-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument Collections

# NUREG-Series Publications

*Reports or brochures on regulatory decisions, results of research, results of incident investigations, and other technical and administrative information.*
            - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff NUREG-(nnnn)
            - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff NUREG/BR-(nnnn)
            - Conference Proceeding Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors NUREG/CP-(nnnn)
            - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors NUREG/CR-(nnnn)
            - Publications Resulting from International Agreements NUREG/IA-(nnnn)
            - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management NUREG/KM-(nnnn)
            - Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
            - Drafts for Comment

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 08, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes
          - Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials
          - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
          - Agreement State Action Items
          - Agreement State Communications
          - ASLBP
          - Commission Documents
          - Congressional Documents
          - Electronic Government (E-Gov) Documents
          - Enforcement Documents
          - Enforcement Petition (2.206)
          - Events, Reports Associated with
          - Fact Sheets & Brochures
          - Federal Register Notices (NRC)
          - Forms (NRC)
          - For the Record
          - Generic Communications
          - Generic Issues
          - Government Information Locator Service (GILS)
          - Human Factors Information System
          - Inspection Manual
          - OIG Reports
          - IMPEP Reviews of NRC Programs
          - Interim Staff Guidance
          - Management Directives
          - Memoranda of Understanding
          - News Releases
          - NMSS Procedures
          - NRC Datasets
          - NRC Infographics
          - NRC Maps
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - OMB Exhibit 300s
          - Personal Identity Verification
          - Previous Site Additions
          - Regulations (NRC, 10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides (by Division)
          - Research Information Letters
          - Rulemaking Documents
          - Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 08, 2020
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Assessment of NDE Methods on Inspection of HDPE Butt Fusion Piping Joints for Lack of Fusion (NUREG/CR-7136, PNNL-20300)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7136 (PDF - 13.51 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2011**Date Published:** May 2012

**Prepared by:** S. L. Crawford, S. R. Doctor, A. D. Cinson, M. W. Watts, S. E. Cumblidge, T. E. Hall, and M. T. Anderson

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

W. E. Norris, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code N6398

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has a multi-year program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to provide engineering studies and assessments of issues such as the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) butt fusion joints. This work was begun in response to requests from commercial nuclear licensees to employ HDPE materials in nuclear power plant systems. HDPE has been widely used in low-pressure, low-temperature applications such as natural gas lines, water, sewer, and petrochemical applications. There are a number of issues related to its use at the higher temperatures that would be encountered in nuclear applications.

Materials issues associated with the use of HDPE at higher temperatures are being investigated under a separate contract. The work described in this report is being conducted by the NRC at PNNL to assess whether a volumetric inspection method can be applied to the fusion joint that may reliably detect lack-of-fusion (LOF) conditions. Temperatures at or exceeding the design temperature may result in the failure of piping due to LOF.

Twenty-four HDPE pipe specimens were butt fused in 3408 material to contain LOF conditions that could be used to assess the effectiveness of NDE methods applied. (It should be noted that 4710 became the material of choice after this study was initiated [in large part to address some of the issues associated with the higher temperature application]. The NRC plans to assess 4710 material.) A range of NDE measurements were performed using ultrasonic and electromagnetic methods. Destructive evaluations were conducted using several different methods, but eventually were focused on a side-bend test procedure. All of the NDE results and destructive test results have been analyzed and documented in this report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1743 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1743

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a 
 candidate for election to the office or Representative in Congress or 
Senator from accepting contributions from any political committee other 
 than an authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a 
                            leadership PAC.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2017

  Mr. O'Rourke (for himself and Mr. Khanna) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a 
 candidate for election to the office or Representative in Congress or 
Senator from accepting contributions from any political committee other 
 than an authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a 
                            leadership PAC.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No PAC Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PACS BY 
              CANDIDATES FOR REPRESENTATIVE OR SENATOR.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(k) Prohibitions Relating to Certain Political Committees.--
            ``(1) Acceptance of contributions from pacs.--A candidate 
        for election for the office of Senator or Representative in, or 
        Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress, may not 
        accept a contribution with respect to the election from any 
        political committee other than an authorized committee of the 
        candidate.
            ``(2) Establishment of leadership pac.--A candidate for 
        election for the office of Senator or Representative in, or 
        Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not 
        establish a leadership PAC (as defined in subparagraph (B) of 
        section 304(i)(8)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring after 2018.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6156
NATHANIEL LEE HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; GARY WATERS, Sheriff; SENTENCING JUDGE, Portsmouth, Virginia Civil Center 1982; VON L. PIERSALL, JR., Convicting Judge; SCOTT EHRENWORTH, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney; STEPHEN R. MCCULLOUGH, Virginia Assistant Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6265
NATHANIEL LEE HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY WATERS, Portsmouth, Virginia Sheriff; VON L. PIERSALL, JR., Judge; SCOTT EHRENWORTH, Prosecutor; R. M. HOLLEY, Detective; C. E. HOLLOWOOD, Detective, Defendants - Appellees.- 2 - No. 04-6314
NATHANIEL LEE HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; GARY WATER, Sheriff, Portsmouth, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-6315
NATHANIEL LEE HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SCOTT EHRENWORTH, Prosecutor; C. E. HOLBWOOD, Officer-Jail; C. E. HOLLOWOOD, Detective, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-885-2; CA-04-29-2; CA-04-27-2; CA-04-28-2) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.- 3 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Lee Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 4 - PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Lee Harvey appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeHarvey v. Johnson , No. CA-03-885-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2004); Harvey v. Waters , No. CA-04-29-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2004); Harvey v. Johnson , No. CA04-27-2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 3, 2004 & entered Feb. 4, 2004); Harvey v. Ehrenworth , No. CA-04-28-2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 3, 2004 & entered Feb. 4, 2004). We deny Harvey’s motions for preparation of transcripts, for oral argument, and for review of the records in the clerk’s office. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Submitted on record and briefs January 15,

affirmed July 7, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Jerome F. Bischoff, Claimant. Jerome F. BISCHOFF, *Petitioner, v.*BISCHOFF & STROOBAND, P.C. and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(91-07659; CA A76223)

855 P2d 1133

Jerome F. Bischoff, Eugene, filed the brief *pro se.*

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondents.

*530Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

RIGGS, J.

*531RIGGS, J.

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying attorney fees. In this case of first impression, we affirm.

Claimant is an attorney who sustained a compen-sable injury. SAIF denied the claim. Claimant represented himself. The referee awarded claimant a 25 percent penalty and an assessed attorney fee for unreasonable denial of the claim under ORS 656.386(1). The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the penalty award and reversed the award of attorney fees. Claimant assigns error to the reversal of the award of attorney fees.

We review for error of law. ORS 183.482(8)(a). However, we will defer to the Board’s interpretation of its rule, so long as that interpretation is not inconsistent with the rule or the policy expressed in the statutes. *Mershon v. Oregonian Publishing,*96 Or App 223, 227, 772 P2d 440, *rev den*308 Or 315 (1989). The Board’s ruling is not inconsistent with rules or statutes. Its definition of attorney fees is:

> “ ‘Attorney fee’ means payment for legal services performed by an attorney *on behalf and at the request of a*claimant * * * under ORS Chapter 656.” OAR 438-15-005(4). (Emphasis supplied.)

In *Stanley*W. *Talley,*38 Van Natta 1553, 1554 (1986), the Board ruled that *pro se*claimants who are not attorneys may not be awarded an attorney fee. Nothing in the statutes suggests that the legislature intended to treat *pro se*attorneys differently from other *pro se*claimants. Claimant is not entitled to attorney fees.

Affirmed.
From: Caryn Muellerleile [mailto:Muellerleile.Caryn@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: 07/27/2012 12:38 PM EDT

To: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Robin Dunkins <Dunkins.Robin@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: Re: Package For OMB

Thanks, the amended package is now in ROCIS. 

Caryn

=======================

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Caryn Muellerleile/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 07/27/2012 11:51 AM 

Subject: Re: Package For OMB 

Sorry I'm off site today but I've asked someone to open it up. Check back in rocis after a bit. 

=======================

From: Caryn Muellerleile [mailto:Muellerleile.Caryn@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 11:26 AM

To: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Robin Dunkins <Dunkins.Robin@epamail.epa.gov> 

Subject: Fw: Package For OMB 

Hi Nathan,

I'm in ROCIS now and I do not see Pulp & Paper (RIN 2060-AQ41) open for amendment. Can 

you help out?

Thanks,

Caryn

Caryn Muellerleile

Regulatory Management Division

Office of Policy

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (1806A)

Washington, DC 20460

(202) 564-2855

(202) 564-0965 – fax

muellerleile.caryn@epa.gov