alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016196EN.01005602.xml

| 21.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/56

---

Corrigendum to the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 20 May 2015

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 152 of 18 June 2015
  )

On page 15, in Section IV, Part B.1., point 130, fourth line:

for:

‘... and that it be prepared in accordance with the model ...’

read:

‘... and that it be prepared in the language of the case in accordance with the model ...’

---
No. 86-652.

#### Maryland *v.*Clark.

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                     FORM 10-QSB
                   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR15(D) OF THE
                         THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT
                                      30-SEP-97

EXHIBIT 11.1
------------
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION 
OF PRIMARY PER SHARE EARNINGS          3 MONTHS ENDED      9 MONTHS ENDED
                                         30-Sep-97           30-Sep-97
                                       --------------      --------------

SHARES OUTSTANDING 1-1-97                6,288,507           6,288,507

SHARES ISSUED 3-31-97                        5,524

WEITGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES ISSUED
3/31/97                                                          2,762


                                       ===========         ===========
SHARES USED TO COMPUTE LOSS PER SHARE    6,294,031           6,291,269
                                       ===========         ===========


                                        Page 1
#### Moe Brothers Manufacturing Company, Appellant, vs. Paoli, Defendant: Electric Motors Corporation, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Bender, Trump & McIntyre,*attorneys, and *Werner J. Trimborn*and *David G. Owen, Jr.,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Simmons, Walker, Wratten & Sporer*of Racine.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryLicensing Support Network (LSN) Library

# LSN Library Help and References

The following resources are available:
            - References for the Licensing Support Network (LSN) Library
            - LSN Library Availability
            - Public Document Room Assistance
            - References for Web-based ADAMS (WBA)

## LSN Library References

            - LSN Library Quick Reference Guide
            - LSN Library User Guide

## LSN Library Availability

LSN Library is available 7 days a week, with the following exception:
            - Scheduled maintenance periods (between 6:00 p.m. ET on Friday and 6:00 a.m. ET on Saturday)

## Public Document Room Assistance

The NRC Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff are available to provide LSN Library assistance.

The PDR is located at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. Telephone reference service is provided between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time at 301-415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.

The PDR staff can also assist you with:
            - ADAMS hardware and software issues
            - Searching the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) Library for documents released since November 1, 1999
            - Searching the Public Legacy Library for earlier documents dating back to 1980, which are available in microfiche format
            - Obtaining paper copies of documents from ADAMS, as well as copies of pre-ADAMS documents in various formats. These materials may be ordered for a fee via the PDR. See  PDR Copy Service and Fees .

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Help and References
          - Hours of Operation

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search for NRC Documents

            - Begin LSN Library Search
            - Begin WBA Search
            - Begin EHD Search

#### Key Topics

            - Web-based ADAMS (WBA)
            - Electronic Hearing Docket (EHD)

#### Notice to LSN Library Users

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

**DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION**

**(in thousands)**

 
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | **Three Months**         | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | **Ended March 31, 2005** | ** ** |
| Net income from continuing operations, less preferred distributions          |       | $                        | 24,059     |   |
| Preferred distributions                                                      |       | 11,620                   |       |
| Earnings from sale of land, net of impairment adjustments                    |       | (143                     | )          |
| Interest expense                                                             |       | 35,226                   |       |
| Earnings before fixed charges                                                |       | $                        | 70,762     |   |
| Interest expense                                                             |       | $                        | 35,226     |   |
| Interest costs capitalized                                                   |       | 1,727                    |       |
| Total fixed charges                                                          |       | $                        | 36,953     |   |
| Preferred distributions                                                      |       | 11,620                   |       |
| Total fixed charges and  preferred distributions                             |       | $                        | 48,573     |   |
| **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**                                       | ** ** | **1.91**                 | ** ** |
| **Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and  preferred distributions** | ** ** | **1.46**                 | ** ** |

 

 

----
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

October 24, 2012 Session

TORRIE SCHNEIDER LONGANACRE v. MATTHEW ROBERT

LONGANACRE

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County

No. MCCHCVDI10490 Laurence M. McMillan, Chancellor

No. M2012-00161-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 16, 2013

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, P.J., M.S., dissenting.

I dissent from the majority because I believe that the evidence preponderates against

the trial court’s finding that the husband did not prove a ground for divorce. My review of

the record leads me to conclude that the husband did, in fact, produce unrebutted evidence

that established the ground of inappropriate marital conduct.

While there appears to be some lack of unanimity in appellate decisions on the

specific words to be applied in defining inappropriate marital conduct, the

basic question remains whether either or both of the parties engaged in a

course of conduct which (1) caused pain, anguish or distress to the other party

and (2) rendered continued cohabitation “improper,” “unendurable,”

“intolerable” or “unacceptable.” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (Supp.

1999); Gardner v. Gardner, 104 Tenn. 410, 412, 58 S.W. 342, 343 (1900);

Garvey v. Garvey, 29 Tenn. App. 291, 299-300, 203 S.W.2d 912, 916 (1946);

White v. White, Carrol Eq. No. 3, 1988 WL 101253 at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct.

3, 1988) (no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed); Brown v. Brown, No.

02A01-9108-CV-00168, 1992 WL 5243 at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 1992)

(no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed). Over twenty-five years ago, this

court recognized as inappropriate marital conduct the everyday treatment of

a spouse “by which love, the vital principle which animates a marriage, is

tortured to death; with the result that the once happy joinder becomes nothing

less than a ‘bridge of groans across a stream of tears.’” Newberry v. Newberry,

493 S.W.2d 99, 101 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1973).
. . . Both parties’ actions and statements establish the undisputed fact that their

prior conduct toward each other has caused pain and distress such that each

party has determined that cohabitation is improper, unendurable, and

unacceptable. Therefore, I would find that the evidence preponderates against

the trial court’s finding that inappropriate marital conduct was not proved.

Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877, 891-93 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

In this case, Mr. Longanacre established that his wife interfered with his relationship

with his daughter and the rest of his family, testimony that went unrebutted. In my opinion,

that evidence, together with the mutual desire to separate, establish grounds for divorce.

____________________________

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL,JUDGE

-2-
#### Strong and others v. *G*lasgow and others.

A agrees with B at a Sheriff’s sale, to bid off the property sold, for B. He bids it off, and takes a conveyance to himself, and then refuses to convey to B. As B is not privy to the oonvej'ance, he is not bound by it ; and he may produce parol evidence to prove the agreement between A and himself.

The bill charged, that William Sheppard, the father of the complainant, being considerably indebted, with a view to make payment, came to an agreement with B. Sheppard, to convey to him a tract of land r for which B. *290Sheppard was to convey to W, Sheppard two other tracts, of inferior value by £800 ; to satisfy which cl if-ference, B. Shcppapd was to pay off all the debts, and jllt[e(llnify w, Sheppard from them. That soon after the agreement, W. Sheppard died, and one of his credi-f tors obtained judgment aqd took out execution, which was levied on his slaves; and at the sale, B. Sheppard, intending to perforin his agreement, bid off twelve slaves, at s®lSS, for the benefit of the complainants ; that lie took an absolute bill of sale from the Sheriff to himself, but that the purchase was really made in trust and for the benefit of the complainants. And the case was sent to this Court upon the question, whether parol evidence could be received to prove the agreement, and set up the' trust for the complainants. And,

By the Court.

This case is not influenced by the principles that decided the case of Streator v. Jones, (1 *Murph.*449.) The complainants allege, that the Defendant, B. Sheppard, contrary to the agreement he had entered into, which was to purchase the property for the complainants, took an absolute deed to himselfi They were not privy to that deed, and of course not hound by it. They are therefore at liberty to produce parol evidence to establish the original contract.
# L_2016336EN.01004201.xml

| 10.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 336/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 336/42

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1836 of 12 October 2015 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 266 of 13 October 2015
  )

On page 80, Article 1, point 4 (concerning Article 28(2) of Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP):

for:

‘... (g) ... and persons associated with them, as listed in Annex I, shall be frozen.’,

read:

‘... (g) ... and persons and entities associated with them, as listed in Annex I, shall be frozen.’.

---
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

FORM 10-QSB


Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996      

Commission File Number   33-98694-NY                                

                  BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.                 
(Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

  Nevada                                 
11-3276768                                        
(State or Other Jurisdiction of         (IRS Employer        Incorporation or 
Organization)         Identification No.)


       63 Wall Street, Suite 1801, New York, NY  10005       
     (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                       (212) 344-1600                        
     (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

                                                                  
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed
     Since Last Report)

     Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by 
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for 
such 
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and 
(2) 
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x     No      

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, as of 
September 
30, 1996 was: 16,500 

The purpose of this Amendment is to add a Financial Data 
Schedule.<PAGE>BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
September 30, 1996






INDEX


Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
               Financial Data Schedule
<PAGE>
Item 6. Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule
<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


               BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.


              By: Oleg Lagutenko                            
          
               Oleg Lagutenko, President
               



Dated: 2/27/97     Oleg Lagutenko                                 

               Oleg Lagutenko, President, Director


Dated: 2/27/97     Melvyn S. Aronoff                                
               Melvyn S. Aronoff, Secretary, Director
No. 89-1714.

No. 90-113.

#### Pauley, Survivor of Pauley *v.*Beth-Energy Mines, Inc., et al. Clinchfield Coal Co. *v.*Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Depart*1045ment of Labor, et al. Consolidation Coal Co. *v.*Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, et al.

*1044C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 937];

*1045No. 90-114.

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 937]; and

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 937.] Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted. Request of the claimants to be designated as respondents for purposes of oral argument granted.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Mr. David K. Paylor UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Director Paylor: 

### MAY 212015

On May 7, 2015 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality (VADEQ) revising the definition ofvolatile organic compound (VOC) to add two chemical compounds 

### (trans 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene and 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene) to the list ofsubstances not considered to be VOCs. EPA has determined that the submittals are administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing the submittals to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking (DFR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2166 or shandruk.irene@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality Sincerely



# Jj **clr'p_~**

Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division



# 0 Printedon 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
---

Exhibit 13.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian
Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hyeon Seong Myeong, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/Hyeon Seong
Myeong Name: Myeong, Hyeon Seong Title: President, CEO, Director
Date: August 18, 2006

---
Exhibit
32.1








KINDER
MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC
(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and will be retained by Kinder Morgan
Management, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.








Dated:
      February 28, 2008
            
            /s/
      Richard D. KinderRichard
      D. Kinder
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
          SPINTEX GAMING  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC. FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
          ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                        201
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 635
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                 2,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            3,128
<PP&E>                                                        526
<DEPRECIATION>                                                149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              4,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       3,665
<BONDS>                                                       762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                      288
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                4,565
<SALES>                                                     1,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,501
<CGS>                                                         810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,026)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.01)


</TABLE>
No. 82-1048.

#### Morial *v.*Council of the City of New Orleans et al.

Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                          S.Y. BANCORP CAPITAL TRUST I


         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF S.Y. BANCORP CAPITAL TRUST I (the
"Trust"), dated as of May 3, 2001, is being duly executed and filed on behalf
of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under
the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

         1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is S.Y.
Bancorp Capital Trust I.

         2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on
the date of filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned, being a trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811
of the Act.

                                     WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee


                                     By:   /s/ Donald G. MacKelcan
                                          ---------------------------------
                                     Name:  Donald G. MacKelcan
                                     Title:  Vice President


                                     /s/ David P. Heintzman
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     DAVID P. HEINTZMAN, as Trustee


                                     /s/ Kathy C. Thompson
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     KATHY C. THOMPSON, as Trustee


                                     /s/ Nancy B. Davis
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     NANCY B. DAVIS, as Trustee