alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Denied; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion 

filed February 12, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00095-CV

IN RE DELCOR USA, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

133rd District court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-56262

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 6, 2013, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the 

petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding 

judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County to vacate the order of the trial court 

signed January 29, 2013, transferring venue to Dallas County.

As a rule, permissive venue determinations are not reviewable by mandamus. See 

In re Masonite Corp., 997 S.W.2d 194, 197 (Tex. 1999). Appeal is an adequate remedy 
2

even though it involves delay and more expense than obtaining an extraordinary writ. Id. 

An appellate remedy may become inadequate under “exceptional circumstances.” Id. 

This case does not present any of the “extraordinary circumstances” that justify 

mandamus relief. See In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S.W.3d 257, 262 (Tex. 2008). 

Accordingly, relator has not established their entitlement to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and also deny relator’s 

related emergency motion to stay proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison and McCally.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# National Source Tracking System (NUREG/BR-0472)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Background

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0472 (PDF - 820.12 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 2010

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Background

The National Source Tracking System (NSTS), a major security initiative of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), is a secure, user-friendly, Web-based database that tracks NRC and Agreement State-regulated Category 1 and Category 2 radioactive sources. The NSTS tracks these high-risk, radioactive sources from the time of their manufacture or import through the time of their disposal or export, or until they decay enough to no longer be of concern. The NSTS meets the U.S. Government's commitment to implement a national source registry as described in the 2004 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources and later mandated in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Cody-Yellowstone Air Improvement Resources

"Promoting Commercial Air Service for the Bighorn Basin"

December 6,2013

Michael F. Martin

Office of Aviation Analysis

US Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street, S. W.

Washington, D. C. 20590

RE: USDOT Essential Air Service Bids for Yellowstone Regional Airport

Dear Mr. Martin:

-.

- •.

Cody-Yellowstone Air Improvement Resources (CYAIR) is comprised of the elected and the business

leaders of l'ark County. These individuals support commercial air service at Yellowstone Regional

Airport. -They recognize that consistent and quality commercial air service is essential to the nearby

communities.

After reviewing the proposals from SkyWest Airlines and United Airlines to provide Essential Air

Service to Yellowstone Regional Airport, the Board of CYAIR fully supports the proposals from both

airlines. Park County communities have supported both of these airlines in the past, and look forward

to continuing to do so with the services being proposed.

Consistent commercial air service is a keystone for good business and quality of life.

Sincerely,

~e...~ \.......

Raymond Lee

CYAIR Administrator

CYAIR P. O. Box 1448 Cody, Wyoming 82414 rayleecya ir@gmail.com (602).315-0604
Exhibit 32.1
Form 10-KSB/A
Ogden Golf Co. Corporation
File No. 333-105075




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
the Ogden Golf Co. Corporation(the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

         I, Mark A. Scharmann, President, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:

          1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ogden
Golf Co. Corporation.


Dated: September 14, 2007              By: /s/ Mark A. Scharmann
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                Mark A. Scharmann
                                                President
                                                Principal Executive Officer
                                                Principal Accounting Officer
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50348 Conference Calendar

__________________ ROI LE' SHILOH-BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus MICHAEL KINABREW, Individually and in Official Capacity as TDCJ-ID Correctional Guard; R.A. LEONARD, Individually and in Official Capacity as TDCJ-ID Correctional Guard; LUANN TIPPIT, Individually and in Official Capacity as a TDCJ-ID Clerk 3, Counselor Substitute; RAUL MATA, Captain, Individually and in Official Capacity as a TDCJ-ID Disciplinary Captain; R. HARVEY, Individually and in Official Capacity as a TDCJ-ID Guard; OWEN, Doctor, Individually and in Official Capacity as a TDCJ-ID Medical Personnel; JIMMY WOOD, Individually and in Official Capacity as a Justice of the Peace, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-94-CA-113
- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roi Le' Shiloh-Bryant's petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The district court's determination not to appoint counsel in this case was not an abuse of discretion.No. 95-50348 -2- Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). The district court is not precluded from appointing counsel, if necessary, during the pendency of the proceedings. AFFIRMED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1919 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify eligibility for the 

child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. FERGUSON (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. BARTON, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, and Mr. FRANKS of Arizona) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

eligibility for the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Tax Credit Pro5 tection Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(e)(1) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘under this 

9 section to a taxpayer’’ and all that follows and inserting 

10 ‘‘under this section to any taxpayer unless— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1919 IH

1 ‘‘(1) such taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s valid 

2 identification number (and, in the case of a joint re3 turn, the valid identification number of the tax4 payer’s spouse) on the return of tax for the taxable 

5 year, and 

6 ‘‘(2) with respect to any qualifying child, the 

7 taxpayer includes the name and taxpayer identifica8 tion number of such qualifying child on such return 

9 of tax.’’. 

10 (b) VALID IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.—Section 24(e) 

11 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) VALID IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.—For 

14 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘valid identi15 fication number’ means a social security number 

16 issued to an individual by the Social Security Ad17 ministration. Such term shall not include a TIN 

18 issued by the Internal Revenue Service.’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1013

In re: JOHN DOE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-BO-1)

Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020

Amended: October 22, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly 

delayed acting on his motions for bond and appointment of counsel. He seeks an order 

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket 

reveals that the district court ruled on his motion on January 15, 2020. Accordingly, 

because the district court has recently ruled on Doe’s motion, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
such officer’s knowledge, that:





This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      July 28, 2009
              /s/ Steven C. StrausSteven
      C. StrausChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      July 28, 2009
              /s/ Michael J.
CelebrezzeMichael
      J. CelebrezzeSenior
      Vice President of Finance,Chief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Anto nio, Texas** 

June 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 00

- 00296

- CR

Edward M. JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1998

- CR

- 6320

Honorable Mark Luitjen , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

On June 13, 2001, this court dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction . The Texas

Court of Crimi n al Appeals later refused appellant’s petition for review, and our mandate issued

on December 31, 2001. On February 27, 2014, this court denied appellant’s motion to reform

the judgment. Appellant has now filed two pro se motions: (1) a Motion to Co rrect and Amend

Inaccuracies in the Court Clerk’s Record of the Judgment Adjudicating Guilt, Document ‘July

12, 2004’” and (2) a Motion to Correct and Amend Inaccuracies in the Reporter’s Clerk’s Record

Volume 2, March 29, 2000.”

Both motions are DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on the 27 th day of June , 201 4

.

PER CURIA M

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Lewis, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 689]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered January 12, 1994, convicting him, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and drawing all reasonable inferences in their favor *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), we find defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The *549minor inconsistencies between the testimony of the arresting officer and that of the undercover officer were evaluated by the jury and there is no reason to disturb its determination *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). Moreover, while no drugs or prerecorded money were recovered from defendant, there was ample time for defendant to dispose of such items before he was apprehended *(see, People v Santiago,*206 AD2d 251, *lv denied*84 NY2d 832). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of LOCA 6" and LOCA 2" Transients in the RHR of a PWR Under Low Power Conditions Using RELAP5/MOD3.2 (NUREG/IA-0171)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0171 (PDF 1.60 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2000

**Prepared by:** S. Martorell, S. Carlos, G. Verdú, V. Serradell, J. Rodenas, R. Miró, C. Llopis*

*C.N. Vandellos II Travessera de les Corts, 55, Lateral 08028 Barcelona

Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Polytechnic University of Valencia Camino de Vera, 14 Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The present study consists of the simulation of two loss of coolant accidents, LOCA 6" and LOCA 2", in one of the residual heat removal system (RHR) lines outside the containment, using the thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD3.2.

Both transients have been simulated on a typical three loop, Westinghouse design, pressurized water reactor plant working under shutdown conditions.

The study was focused on the simulation of the most important thermal-hydraulic parameters in order to check the validity of the success criteria assumed in the plant probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) under shutdown conditions. Also to analyze the code capability for simulating shutdown conditions was of interest in this study.

As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the main thermal-hydraulic plant features follow what is foreseen in the plant PSA, although it can not be assured that the values reached are the correct ones due to the lack of experimental data.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2015019EN.01001401.xml

| 24.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/14

---

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/67 (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2015) of 14 January 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 11 of 17 January 2015
  )

In the title on the cover page and on page 72:

for:

‘
  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/67 (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2015) of 14 January 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)
  ’

read:

‘
  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/67 of 14 January 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2015)
  ’

---
---

Exhibit 12.2.

Certifications

I, Hyeon-Seong Myeong, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Meridian
Co. Ltd. ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

By: /s/Hyeon-Seong MyeongName: Hyeon-Seong
Myeong Title: CFO, Director 
  Date: August 19, 2011

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2012

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

          In connection with the Annual Report (the "report") of Neutron
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Rory Olson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Ciaran Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

          (1)  the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Rory Olson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rory Olson
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Ciaran Griffin
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ciaran Griffin
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 2, 2007
#### In Hildebrand v. Douglass, from Catawba:

Smith, C.-J.

This case is essentially the same as that of *Setzer*v. *Douglass,*and for the reasons given in the opinion in that ease, which are equally applicable here, the ruling in the court below must be reversed, aud the court directed to proceed in the cause. Let this be certified to the superior court of Catawba.

Error. ( • Reversed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of ROSA-2 Test 3 Counterpart with TRACE5 – Application to Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG/IA-0512)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021