alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark E. Ties, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                    /s/  Mark E. Ties
                                                    ____________________________
                                                    Mark E. Ties
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    July 28, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Rosario, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 662]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered January 2, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the People failed to elicit sufficient *513evidence to establish that he knowingly attempted to purchase one-half ounce or more of a substance containing a narcotic drug at the time of his arrest *(People v Ryan,*82 NY2d 497) was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law by defendant’s general motion for a trial order of dismissal *(People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10), and we decline to review the issue in the interest of justice. The money defendant was using to buy narcotics was properly admitted to corroborate the officers’ testimony of having observed an exchange of money for drugs *(People v Perez,*185 AD2d 147, *lv denied*80 NY2d 976) and to prove that defendant came " ’dangerously close’ ” to completing the purchase *(see, People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174, 191). Finally, the minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the two officers pointed out by defendant provides no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932; *People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196, 205). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7615

MARVIN LOVEJOY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-03-3553-8-24BI)

Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Lovejoy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Lovejoy, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of

the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Lovejoy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Lovejoy’s

motions to amend judgment and to set aside his sentence and

conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Trade Wind Communication
Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Neville Zammit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Trade Wind
Communications Limited;

2.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section
78o(d)); and

3.   Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report
on Form 20-F; and

4.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: March 17, 2004                             /s/ Neville Zammit
                                                  Neville Zammit
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 10.4

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 January 24, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010 December 3, 2010, December 17, 2010 and January 10, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Arnold Schumsky (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 and to which this Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.                                       The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “February 7, 2011.”

 

2.                                       Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
PRECISION   OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Arnold Schumsky
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Arnold   Schumsky
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management

# Fundamental Theory of Scientific Computer Simulation Review (NUREG/KM-0006)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/KM-0006 (PDF - 2.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2013**Date Published:**November 2013

**Prepared by:** Joshua Stephen Kaizer

 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

"How much work is required to trust the results of a scientific computer simulation when human lives are at stake?" For many, this question is purely academic. But for those dealing with high consequence simulations, such as the simulations performed to demonstrate the safety of a nuclear power plant, the question is very pertinent and answering it is the domain of scientific computer simulation review. While simulation review has been performed for many years, it is rarely seen as a field of study in its own right. Consequently, requirements are often developed for a specific simulation and a particular use. If either the simulation or the use changes, new requirements must developed. To help solve this problem, some fundamental theory of scientific computer simulation review is proposed. This fundamental theory included the generation of a basic vocabulary, a formalization of the concept of maturity, the creation of simulation component hierarchy, and the development of an assessment framework.

A basic vocabulary was generated to define the many common and important concepts used in simulation review. By focusing on review in general, the resulting vocabulary captures many of the ideas important to all simulation reviews and provides a better means of discussing the trustworthiness of their results. The concept of maturity was formalized into Maturity Theory. This theory provides a detailed analysis of maturity, which was used to better understand the tools available in simulation review. The Hierarchy of Scientific Computer Simulation Components was created to capture the various components of a generic simulation and define the relationships between those components. This Hierarchy provides a methodology which can be used to organize and represent many simulations. The Theoretical/Logical Maturity Assessment Framework for Scientific Computer Simulations was developed using the concepts from Maturity Theory and the Hierarchy. This framework provides a structure which establishes the boundaries of simulation review, highlights many of the assumptions of a simulation which need to be supported if the results of the simulation are to be trusted, and establishes a method for its continually evolution. By contributing this fundamental theory, these advancements better established the field scientific computer simulation review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2015358EN.01000101.xml

| 30.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 October 2015

renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2015/C 358/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nominee submitted to the Council by the Commission as regards the employees' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018. However these Decisions did not include all of the members to be appointed, |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018. However these Decisions did not include all of the members to be appointed,

2

3

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of its term of office, which runs until 17 September 2018:

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

| HUNGARY | Mr László KOZÁK |
| --- | --- |

HUNGARY

Mr László KOZÁK

Article 2

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Luxembourg, 30 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. ETGEN

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 232, 16.7.2015, p. 2.

2

(3)  OJ C 305, 16.9.2015, p. 2.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                            3,085,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    68,579,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 74,195,000
<PP&E>                                           17,806,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (2,894,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  147,606,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91,758,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             65,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       69,601,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    147,606,000
<SALES>                                         138,900,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                138,900,000
<CGS>                                           111,441,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 33,882,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,511,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (7,847,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (7,847,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (7,847,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.50)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          8,788                         0
<SECURITIES>                                        0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,350                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         0                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,788                         0
<PP&E>                                      1,918,937                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                115,824                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,872,129                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          76,324                         0
<BONDS>                                       818,000                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                         0
<COMMON>                                          965                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    909,402                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,872,129                         0
<SALES>                                             0                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              116,491                   312,397
<CGS>                                               0                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  48,231                   133,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,226                    74,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,942                    40,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                27,092                    64,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,837                    25,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,255                    38,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                         0
<CHANGES>                                           0                       779
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,255                    37,734
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.17                      0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.17                      0.39



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         173,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,236)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,081
<PP&E>                                       1,665,515
<DEPRECIATION>                               (103,236)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,927,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,235,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,927,455
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,745
<CGS>                                           89,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Craig T. Davenport, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities andExchange Commission.     /s/ CRAIG T. DAVENPORT     *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board*   Date: August 9, 2005
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 20 -2904

___________________________

Jose Luis Elias -Huinac

Petitioner

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States

Respondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

Submitted: April 08 , 20 21 Filed: April 13, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges

.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Jose Luis Elias

- Huinac petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen proceedings. Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court finds no basis for reversal.-2- T his court concludes that Elias -Huinac’ s due process claim is without merit.
See Alva

- Arellano v. Lynch , 811 F.3d 1064, 1066 (8th Cir. 2016) (to establish due process violation, noncitizen must demonstrate both fundamental procedural error, and prejudice); Nunez- Portillo v. Holder , 763 F.3d 974, 977 (8th Cir. 2014) (no constitutionally protected liberty interest in discretionary remedy of cancellation of removal). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying E lias -Huinac’ s untimely motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of entry of final order of removal); Vargas v. Holder , 567 F.3d 387, 391 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________