alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EERE Information Center

Programs and Offices

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Small Electric Motors Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Technical Support Document

This page presents the chapters and appendices from the technical support

document, which provides the analyses and results supporting the notice of

proposed rulemaking for small electric motors.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe

Reader.

Title Page (PDF 68 KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1: Introduction (PDF 45 KB)

Chapter 2: Analytical Framework (PDF 100 KB)

Chapter 3: Market and Technology Assessment (PDF 274 KB)

Chapter 4: Screening Analysis (PDF 212 KB)

Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis (PDF 590 KB)

Chapter 6: Energy Use Characterization (PDF 182 KB)

Chapter 7: Markups for Equipment Price Determination (PDF 243 KB)

Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis (PDF 652 KB)

Chapter 9: Shipments Analysis (PDF 293 KB)

Chapter 10: National Impact Analysis (PDF 468 KB)

Chapter 11: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group Analysis (PDF 183 KB)

Chapter 12: Manufacturer Impact Analysis (PDF 913 KB)

Chapter 13: Utility Impact Analysis (PDF 86 KB)

Chapter 14: Employment Impact Analysis (PDF 85 KB)

Chapter 15: Environmental Assessment (PDF 139 KB)

Chapter 16: Regulatory Impact Analysis (PDF 253 KB)

Appendices

Appendix 5A: Construction and Performance Specifications of Small Electric

Motors Designed for the Engineering Analysis (PDF 704 KB)

Appendix 8A: User Instructions for Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period

Analysis Spreadsheet (PDF 24 KB)

Appendix 8B: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Results (PDF 368

KB)

Appendix 8C: Life-Cycle Cost Sensitivity Analyses (PDF 772 KB)

Appendix 8D: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Results by Product Class

(PDF 527 KB)

Appendix 8E: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Results at 3% and 7%

Discount Rates (PDF 645 KB)

Appendix 10A: User Instructions for National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet

(PDF 40 KB)

Appendix 10B: National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Results (PDF

54 KB)

Appendix 10C: National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Sensitivity

Analysis (PDF 427 KB)

Appendix 12A: Manufacturer Impact Analysis Interview Guide (PDF 484 KB)

Appendix 12B: Government Regulatory Impact Model Help Document (PDF 70

KB)

Appendix 16A: Regulatory Impact Analysis Supporting Material (PDF 65 KB)

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 11/25/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motor... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 1 12/1/2009 7:37 AM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 17
#### Sage-Fifield Lumber Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Wilkie, Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman*of Madison.

■For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general. '

For the respondent Leo H. Atwood-: *Moran & O’Brien*of Delavan.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNRC Periodic Compliance Monitoring Report for U.S. Department of Energy Non-High-Level Waste Disposa

# NRC Periodic Compliance Monitoring Report for U.S. Department of Energy Non-High-Level Waste Disposal Actions: Report for Calendar Years 2012 and 2013 (NUREG-1911, Revision 5)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1911, Revision 5 (PDF - 1.82 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2015**Date Published:** December 2015

**Prepared by:** P. Yadav1, C. Dinwiddie2, and C. Barr11U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission2Southwest Research Institute

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This is the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's report of its monitoring of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) non-high-level waste disposal actions in Calendar Years 2012 and 2013, in accordance with Section 3116(b) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (the NDAA). Section 3116 of the NDAA requires: (1) that DOE consult with the NRC on its non-high-level waste determinations and plans, and (2) that the NRC, in coordination with the covered States of South Carolina and Idaho, monitor disposal actions that DOE takes to assess compliance with NRC regulations in Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations*, Part 61, "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste," Subpart C, "Performance Objectives." The NRC has prepared this report in accordance with NUREG-1854, "NRC Staff Guidance for Activities Related to U.S. Department of Energy Waste Determinations," dated August 2007.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### Kuehlthau, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Telephone Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Powell & Sprowls*of Superior and *Schoets, Williams & Gandrey*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Dietrich & Daley*of Superior.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# NRC Program for the Resolution of Generic Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-0410)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Preface

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0410 (PDF – 87.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 1977**Date Published:** January 1978

(includes Plans for the Resolution of "Unresolved Safety issues" Pursuant to Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as Amended.)

Report to CongressJanuary 1,1978

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Preface

This report provides a description of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Program for the Resolution of Generic Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plants. The NRC program is of considerably broader scope than the "Unresolved Safety Issues Plan" required by Section 210. The NRC program does include plans for the resolution of "Unresolved Safety Issues"; however, in addition, it includes generic tasks for the resolution of environmental issues, for the development of improvements in the reactor licensing process and for consideration of less conservative design criteria or operating limitations in areas where over conservatisms may be unnecessarily restrictive or costly.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 21, 2024
#### Hoenisch, Respondent, vs. Underwriters Casualty Company, imp., Appellant.

*April 12*

May *9, 1933.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Stone & Park*of Wausau, and oral argument by *Patrick T. Stone.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Alfred W. Ger-hard*and *Bird, Smith, Okoneski & Puchner,*attorneys, and *Charles F. Smith*of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by *Mr. Gerhard*and *Mr. Smith.*

Fritz, J.

This case, and the appeal herein, involve the same facts and questions of law as were involved in the companion case of *Ruth L. Suschnick v. Underwriters Casualty Co. et al., ante,*p. 474, 248 N. W. 477, which was tried together with this case and the case of Warren Cater against the same insurer *(post,*p. 484, 248 N. W. 481). The decision filed herewith in the case of *Ruth L. Suschnick v. Underwriters Casualty Co.*also rules this case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2015220EN.01001301.xml

| 4.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/13

---

DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

of 4 June 2015

on official holidays and judicial vacations

(2015/C 220/04)

THE COURT,

having regard to Article 24(2), (4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure,

whereas it is necessary to establish the list of official holidays and to set the dates of the judicial vacations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The list of official holidays within the meaning of Article 24(4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure is established as follows:

| — | New Year’s Day, |
| --- | --- |

—

New Year’s Day,

| — | Easter Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter Monday,

| — | 1 May, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 May,

| — | Ascension, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ascension,

| — | Whit Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Whit Monday,

| — | 23 June, |
| --- | --- |

—

23 June,

| — | 15 August, |
| --- | --- |

—

15 August,

| — | 1 November, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 November,

| — | 25 December, |
| --- | --- |

—

25 December,

| — | 26 December. |
| --- | --- |

—

26 December.

Article 2

For the period from 1 November 2015 to 31 October 2016, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 24(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2015: from Monday 21 December 2015 to Sunday 10 January 2016 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2015: from Monday 21 December 2015 to Sunday 10 January 2016 inclusive,

| — | Easter 2016: from Monday 21 March 2016 to Sunday 3 April 2016 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2016: from Monday 21 March 2016 to Sunday 3 April 2016 inclusive,

| — | Summer 2016: from Friday 22 July 2016 to Sunday 4 September 2016 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2016: from Friday 22 July 2016 to Sunday 4 September 2016 inclusive.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Luxembourg, 4 June 2015.

A. CALOT ESCOBAR

Registrar

V. SKOURIS

President

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice 
and Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: March 16-17, 2015.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Florida A&M University, College of Law, 201 Beggs Avenue, 
Orlando, Florida 32801.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Rules Committee 
Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 23, 2015.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Rules Committee Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01564 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Technical Basis for the use of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics in Regulatory Applications: Final (NUREG/CR-7278)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7278 (PDF – 2.95 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: **January 2021**Date Published:** January 2022

**Prepared by:**L. HundJ. LewisN. MartinM. StarrD. BrooksA. ZhangR. DingrevilleA. EckertJ. MullinsSandia National LaboratoriesP.O. Box 8500Albuquerque, NM 87185P. RaynaudD. RudlandD. DijamcoS. CumblidgeU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionPatrick Raynaud, NRC Project ManagerOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This NUREG, on probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM), is a companion document to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.245, Revision 0, “Preparing Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics (PFM) Submittals.” This NUREG describes a graded approach to developing PFM submittal documentation, provides a generalized technical basis for conducting PFM analyses, and constitutes the technical basis for RG-1.245.

The graded approach that is outlined below represents a balance between the benefits of clear, consistent, and comprehensive submittals and the need to maintain flexibility for PFM analyses that, by their nature, include many situation-specific aspects. The resulting guidance, provided in RG1.245, outlines a procedure that includes this suggested graded approach for PFM analyses and submittals. The unique characteristics of the underlying regulatory application dictate the breadth and depth of content included in the submission.

This document also describes a hypothetical process for conducting a PFM analysis. This process is aligned with the position on documentation elements given previously in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) technical letter report, “Important Aspects of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analyses,” issued in 2018. The NUREG provides fundamental background for the concepts and methods introduced in the analysis process. The examples give details for analysts on (nonprescriptive) approaches for PFM analyses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, January 25, 2022
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Deliberate Ignition of Hydrogen-Air-Steam Mixtures in Condensing Steam Environments (NUREG/CR-6530, SAND94-1676)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6530 (PDF - 4.86 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 1997**Date Published:**May 1997

**Prepared by:**T.K. BlanchatSandia National LaboratoriesP.O. Box 5800Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-1139Operated by Sandia Corporation

D.W StampsUniversity of Evansville1800 Lincoln AvenueEvansville, Indian 47722

A. Malliakos, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems TechnologyOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code L2443

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Large scale experiments were performed at the Surtsey Test Facility for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to determine the effectiveness of thermal glow plug igniters to burn hydrogen in a condensing steam environment due to the presence of water sprays. The experiments were designed to determine if a detonation or an accelerated flame could occur in a hydrogen-air-steam mixture which was initially nonflammable due to steam dilution but was subsequently rendered flammable by rapid condensation of steam due to water sprays. Eleven Hydrogen Igniter Tests were conducted in the Surtsey test vessel. The Surtsey vessel was instrumented with pressure transducers, thermocouple rakes, gas grab sample bottles, hydrogen microsensors, and cameras. The Surtsey vessel contained two prototypic engineered systems: 1) a deliberate hydrogen ignition system and 2) a water spray system. The experiments were conducted under conditions scaled to be nearly prototypic of those expected in Advanced Light Water Reactors (such as the Combustion Engineering (CE) System 80+), with prototypic spray drop diameter, spray mass flux, steam condensation rates, hydrogen injection flow rates, and using the actual proposed plant igniters. The lack of any significant pressure increase during the majority of the burn and condensation events, signified that localized, benign hydrogen deflagration(s) occurred with no significant pressure load on the Surtsey containment vessel. Igniter location did not appear to be a factor in the open geometry. Initially stratified tests with a stoichiometric mixture in the top showed that the water spray effectively mixes the initially stratified atmosphere prior to the deflagration event. All of the tests demonstrated that thermal glow plugs ignite hydrogen-air-steam mixtures under conditions with water sprays near the flammability limits previously determined for hydrogen-air-steam mixtures under quiescent conditions. This report describes these experiments, gives the experimental results, and provides interpretation of the results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00622 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF L.K.S., C.C.S. II, AND G.E.O.S., CHILDREN

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Calhoun County, Texas.



## ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the C ourt on the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services’ first moti o n fo r extension of time to file its appellee’s brief and its motion to file one brief in response to both appellants’ briefs

. 1 This Court, having fully e xamined and considered appellee ’ s motion , is of the opinion that, in t he interest of justice, appell ee ’ s

1 The appellants in this case are M.H.S., the mother of L.K.S., C .C.S. II, AND G.E.O.S. and C.C.S., the children’s father. A ppellant M.H.S. filed her brief on February 6, 2015. Appellee’s response to that brief was due February 26, 2015. Appellant C.C.S.’s brief was received on March 6, 2015

.2

first motion f or extension of time to file i t s brief and its motion to file one brief in response to the appellants’ briefs should be granted with this order. Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals and incl ude additional expedited deadlines and procedures. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 28.4; T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a),

r e p r i n t e d in T E X

. G O V ’ T C O DE A NN ., tit .2 , s ub tit. F a pp

. ( W e s t, W e stl a w t h ro u g h 20 1 3 3 d C.S.). The appellee 's brief in response to the briefs filed by both appellants is due 7 days after the date appellant C.C.S.’ s brief is filed , until March 27, 2015

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.6(a), (b). The intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure "as far as reasonably possible" that appeals are br ought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). In accordance with the limited time for consideration of these appeals, this Court requires strict adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases, such as this appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by requests for extensions of time to file the brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6; see als o id. R. 28.4. Accordingly, i t is the policy of this Court to limit extensions of time to file a brief to one ten

- day extension of time absent truly extraordinary circumstances. Id. R. 38.6(d). Appellee ’s first motion for extension of time to file its br ief and its motion to file one response to the briefs of appellants are hereby GRANTED , and appellee is hereby ORDERED to file any appellate brief with this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 27,
2015. Further motions for extension of time will not be favorably entertained by this3

Court, absent truly extraordinary circumstances alleged and supported by appropriate argument, authority, and any necessary evidence

.

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed t he 6th day of March , 201 5

.
No. 86-847.

#### Prudential Insurance Company of America *v.*United States.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2023

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 19, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 19, 2024
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"),
we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G.
Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Kirk A. Benson
-------------------------
Kirk A. Benson
Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2005

/s/ Steven G. Stewart
-------------------------
Steven G. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer
August 4, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jeffrey A. Hawthorne
    
    
    
    /s/ Michael SchradleJeffrey A. Hawthorne
    
    
    
    Michael SchradlePresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
# L_2015220EN.01002001.xml

| 21.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 220/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 220/20

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1409 of 19 August 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 20 August 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 20 August 2015

On page 7, in the Annex:

for:

| ‘EG | 253,2’, |
| --- | --- |

‘EG

253,2’,

read:

| ‘EG | 235,2’. |
| --- | --- |

‘EG

235,2’.

---