alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2016

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, June 4, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, June 4, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,721
<PP&E>                                          16,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,121
<SALES>                                        129,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,847
<CGS>                                           64,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,777
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ronald Jankov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RONALD JANKOVRonald Jankov President and Chief Executive Officer March 11, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q 
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 3/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                       198
<INVENTORY>                                      8,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,024
<PP&E>                                          48,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,544
<BONDS>                                         17,493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,126
<SALES>                                         19,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,976
<CGS>                                           17,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,687)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 6, 2001,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended May 6, 2001 and April 28, 2000, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the six-month
period ended May 6, 2001, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended May 6, 2001 and April 28, 2000. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States,
which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Autologic
Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of November 3, 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated
December 8, 2000, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of November 3, 2000, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.



May 25, 2001
Woodland Hills, California
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Craig T. Davenport, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the dates and for the periods indicated.
This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.    /s/ CRAIG T. DAVENPORT   *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board*
Date: November 8, 2004
#### Horace E. Kimball *vs.*William Bartlett.

York County.

Decided March 18, 1912.

Set screw case. Verdict for plaintiff for $1000. Defendant moved for a new trial. The rescript says : "Action on the case wherein plaintiff seeks the recovery of damages from his employer for injuries received by reason of his clothing catching upon a set screw upon a revolving shaft about three feet from the shaft which he had been directed to repair and upon which he was at work at the time of the accident. The evidence is uncontradicted that during part of the time plaintiff was at work he shut down the mill to enable him to do his work in safety but again started it up and that the injury was sustained after he *567had a second time started up the mill. It would seem that he assumed the risk in selecting a dangerous instead of a safe way, both known to him, of doing his work. Be this as it may, it is the clear and unanimous opinion of the court that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence which prevents his recovery. It is uncontradicted that he was a man of mature years and long experience, that he was one of the employees who installed the shaft that caused the injury, that this shaft was of usual construction, that he neither looked nor in any other manner endeavored to ascertain if there was anything upon the shaft causing the injury, which might injure him, and that the idea of taking such precautions did not enter his mind. Such conduct under the circumstances was thoughtless inattention that is inexcusable. *Cunningham*v. *Bath Iron Works,*92 Maine, 501, 507;

See also *Podvin*v. *Manfg. Co.,*104 Maine, 561, 564-565.

Verdict set aside.”

*Frank II. Purinton,*for plaintiff.

*Cleaves, Waterhouse & Emery,*for defendant.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 15


November 9, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:       Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

          1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
     Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors
     and Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

          2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907) 1998 Employee Incentive
     Compensation Plan


Ladies and gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated October 12, 1998 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
three months and nine months ended September 26, 1998, and included within the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement referred to above.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         405,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,416
<INVENTORY>                                    112,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              (91,895)
<PP&E>                                         145,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 702,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,494
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       730,709
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   702,824
<SALES>                                        381,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               381,017
<CGS>                                        (333,317)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (580,162)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00108

- CR

MICHAEL BRANDON GARRETT, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 46938

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens , JJ.2 

### O RDER Appellant Michael Brandon Garrett was convicted of family violence assault and, after a sentence enhancement, was sentenced to twelve years’ incarceration. Garrett has appealed from that conviction and the resulting sentence. On November 26, 2018, Garrett’s court

- appointed appellate counsel, Jason Cassel, filed an Anders 1 brief, and on Dece mber 20, 2018, Garrett filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate record for purposes of preparing a response to his
counsel’s Anders brief. Under Kelly v. State , 2 we are required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Garrett’s access to the record. To ensure that Garrett receives a complete copy of the appellate record in a timely manner, we hereby order our clerk’s office to provide a complete paper copy of the appellate record to
Garrett care of the Bradshaw Unit in Henderson, Texas. Allowing ten days for that record to be delivered to Garrett and giving Garrett thirty days to prepare his pro se response, we hereby set February 11, 2019, as the deadline for Garrett to file his pro se response to his counsel’s Anders
brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT

DATE: January 3 , 2019

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2 Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 321

– 22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# GSI-191: Integrated Debris-Transport Tests in Water Using Simulated Containment Floor Geometries(NUREG/CR-6773)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6773 (PDF - 12.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2002**Date Published:**December 2002

**Prepared by:** D. V. Rao, C. Shaffer,* B. C. Letellier, A. K. Maji,** L. Bartlein

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545

Subcontractors: *ARES Corporation 851 University Blvd. S.E. Suite 100 Albuquerque, NM 87106

**University of New Mexico Department of Civil Engineering Albuquerque, NM 87110

B. P. Jain and M. L. Marshall, NRC Project Managers

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6041

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the results of experiments conducted to examine insulation debris transport under flow and geometry configurations typical of those found in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This work was part of a comprehensive research program to support the resolution of Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-1 91. GSI-191 addresses the potential for debris accumulation on PWR sump screens and consequent loss of the emergency core cooling system pump net positive suction head following a loss-of-coolant accident. Among the GSI-191 program research tasks is the development of a method to estimate debris transport in PWR containments and the quantity of debris that would accumulate on the sump screen for use in plant-specific evaluations. Predicting the transport of debris within the sump pool is an essential part of that methodology.

The analytical method proposed by the Los Alamos National Laboratory to predict debris transport within the pool is to use computational fluid dynamics combined with experimental debris transport data to predict debris transport and accumulation on the screen. The threedimensional tank tests were conducted to test debris transport under conditions that simulate flow regimes relevant to a typical PWR plant. These tests provided insights into the relative importance of the various debris-transport mechanisms and are directly applicable to creating or validating models capable of estimating debris transport within a PWR plant containment sump.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
*October 12, 1936.*

#### Vekich, Respondent, vs. Hall and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Hughes & Anderson*of Superior.

For the respondent: *John F. Padden*of Superior.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J. R. MCFARLANE, K.J BRUBAKER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RYAN C. AHLERSMEYER

LANCE CORPORAL (E

- 3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400333

GENERAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 13 May 2014

. **Military Judge:** LtCol E.H. Robinson, USN

. **Convening Authority:** Commanding General , III Marine

Expeditionary Force, Okinawa, Japan

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation:** Col K.J. E stes

,

USMC

. **For Appellant:** CAPT Charles D. Stimson, JAGC, USN.

**For Appellee:** LT Amy Freyermuth, JAGC, USN.

**29 January 2015** 

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**---------------------------------------------------**

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

   To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize pumped 
storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation 
                              reservoirs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

  Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize pumped 
storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation 
                              reservoirs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau of Reclamation Pumped Storage 
Hydropower Development Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR PUMPED STORAGE HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING 
              MULTIPLE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION RESERVOIRS.

    Section 9(c)(1) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 
485h(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``and pumped storage hydropower 
development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation reservoirs'' after 
``including small conduit hydropower development''.
                                 <all>
```