alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014321EN.01000701.xml

| 7.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 321/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 321/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1199/2014

of 24 October 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pemento de Mougán (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Pemento de Mougán’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Pemento de Mougán’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pemento de Mougán’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pemento de Mougán’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pemento de Mougán’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 198, 27.6.2014, p. 39.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-146-AD

Costs:

Inspection (1 work-hour x $85/hour) $ $85

Parts per airplane $ + 0

Cost per airplane $85

On-Condition Costs:

Hydraulic fairlead change (1 work-hour x $85/hour) $85

IDG cable replacement (4 work-hours x $85/hour) $340

Cost per airplane $ $425

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x

 586

Total fleet cost $249,050

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Home About us Products Installations Downloads News FAQ Contact Us

Terms and Conditions | Site Map | Contact Web Design Kent

MultiCyclone for Cooling 

Towers

More Information

Overview

Images

Back

MultiCyclone for Cooling Towers

The MultiCyclone is a brilliant new centrifugal filtration device that is capable of saving water 

and reducing filter maintenance. The MultiCyclone works on the basis of centrifugal water 

filtration. There are no moving parts to wear and tear, and no filter media to clean or replace. 

Incoming water simply enters 16 hydro cyclones tangentially, generating a strong centrifugal 

effect. Sediment is simply spun out to the hydro cyclone’s wall, and then spirals down to the 

sediment chamber. The filtered water migrates towards the center of the hydro cyclone where 

the flow reverses and spirals upwards through the outlet. Accumulation of sediment can be 

visibly monitored through the MultiCyclone’s clear sediment chamber and is easily cleaned by 

opening the purge valve. Only 15 litres of water is discharged to cleanse the MultiCyclone!   

MultiCyclones are installed prior to a filter system to minimize filter maintenance and water 

usage or installed as a standalone filter capable of filtering down to 30 to 40 microns.

Due to the nature of cooling tower operation the muticyclone is a natural addition for both new 

and existing installations. Unintended quantities of dirt, dust and other airborne debris are 

washed into the cooling system water. Generally cooling towers and recirculation loops are 

dirty, warm, aerated and bio-nutrient rich, therefore they are also perfect incubators for 

microorganism, algae and fungi development. Accumulated dirt in the cooling tower basin 

provides an excellent breeding ground for algae and bacteria (i.e.; Legionella), plus dirt provides 

a layer under which bacteria can be protected from biocide treatments. Dirty water absorbs 

treatment chemicals and makes it difficult to maintain proper residuals. A filtration system is 

capable of removing suspended debris from the circulating water, which can reduce chemical 

consumption in two ways: 

• A decrease in total chemical treatment due to reduced blowdown and treatment make-up 

water 

• A reduction in algaecide/biocide requirements.  

The attached images show a typical installation of a bank of  multicylcones installed on a cooling 

tower at a manufacturing plant that is used in conjunction with a number of injection moulding 

machines. As can be seen from the images the multicyclones removed a great deal of debris. 

Waterco Europe - Installations > Water Treatment Installations Page 1 of 2

http://www.waterco.eu/installations/water-treatment-installations?ptitle=multicyclone-for-cooling-towers_39 8/11/2011
Waterco Europe - Installations > Water Treatment Installations Page 2 of 2

http://www.waterco.eu/installations/water-treatment-installations?ptitle=multicyclone-for-cooling-towers_39 8/11/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1718 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1718

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
             Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2017

Mr. Brooks of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
  Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, Natural 
      Resources, the Judiciary, House Administration, Rules, and 
   Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
             Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ObamaCare Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND 
              THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.--Effective as of 
December 31, 2017, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or 
repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 
been enacted.
    (b) Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.--
Effective as of December 31, 2017, the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152) is repealed, and the 
provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or 
revived as if such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6946

KEITH E. GODWIN, a/k/a Keith E. Goodwin, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00491-RAJ-DEM) 

Submitted: September 6, 2013 Decided: September 13, 2013

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Keith Earl Godwin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for relief 

from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 

363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Godwin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
HomeRadioactive WasteHigh-Level Waste DisposalKey Documents

# DOE's License Application for a High-Level Waste Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain

On June 3, 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), seeking authorization to construct a high-level waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. For details, see the following documents and correspondence from DOE:
        - Transmittal Letter (June 3, 2008)
        - General Information
        - Safety Analysis Report (SAR)
        - References cited by U.S. Department of Energy
        - 2002 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
        - 2008 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
        - 2014 Updated Analysis of Potential Groundwater Impacts after Closure
        - Letter to NRC re: Notification of Plan for Supplementing the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)  (October 3, 2008)
        - Letter to NRC re: Update to the Yucca Mountain Repository License Application (LA) for Construction Authorization.  (February 19, 2009)
        - Letter to NRC re: Notification of Change of Commitment for Supplementing the Final Environmental Impact Statement  (July 30, 2009)

***Note:****Portions of DOE's Yucca Mountain Geologic Repository license application were submitted with bookmarks, as well as hyperlinks to various reference documents (such as the Design Control Documents). However, those bookmarks and hyperlinks are currently inactive in the files that are publicly available through the links provided above. Nonetheless, the various reference documents may be obtained on DVD by contacting the staff of the NRC's Public Document Room.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, February 12, 2018
#### Jerome G. BEERY, petitioner, v. Dan E. TURNER, etc.

No. 82-520.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 29, 1982.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Denied.
#### E. L. Husting Company, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Liquor Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Matthew R. Derson,*attorney, and Rubin, *Zabel & Ruppa*and *Win. B. Rubin*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Tibbs & Tibbs*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

— Order affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of STARMED GROUP, INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Herman Rappaport, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Herman Rappaport
--------------------------
Herman Rappaport
President, CEO and CFO
June 24, 2004
# L_2015058EN.01004101.xml

| 3.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/41

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/325

of 2 March 2015

implementing Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, in view of the situation in Somalia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 of 26 April 2010 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, in view of the situation in Somalia (1), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 April 2010, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 356/2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 April 2010, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 356/2010.

| (2) | On 19 December 2014, the United Nations Security Council Committee, established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009), deleted one person from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 of Security Council Resolution 1844 (2008). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 19 December 2014, the United Nations Security Council Committee, established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009), deleted one person from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 of Security Council Resolution 1844 (2008).

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 March 2015.

For the Council

The President

D. REIZNIECE-OZOLA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 105, 27.4.2010, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The entry in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 for the following person is deleted:

Mohamed SA'ID

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted) (the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D., the Chief Executive
Officer of Molecular Devices Corporation (the "Company"), and Timothy A.
Harkness, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge:

1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

      This Certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Dated: May 10, 2004

       /s/ Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.              /s/ Timothy A. Harkness
       -----------------------------------      -------------------------------
         Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.                     Timothy A. Harkness
         Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Realty LimitedPartnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas L. Hefner, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/    Thomas L. Hefner                                                            |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas L. Hefner  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  of the General Partner  November 12, 2003 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Darell E. Zink, Jr., Vice Chairman,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner andwill be retained by Mr. Zink and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Voltage-Based Alternative Repair Criteria (NUREG-1740)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1740 (PDF 4.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2001**Date Published:** March 2001

****Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Radiologic Assessment System for Consequence AnaLysis (RASCAL) 3.0 is the latest version of the RASCAL series of codes. RASCAL was developed for use by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel who conduct an independent assessment of radiological accidents to prepare dose projections. It includes three sets of tools for use in consequence analysis STDose, FMDose, and DecayCalc. STDose estimates (1) source terms for radiological accidents, (2) atmospheric transport, diffusion, and deposition of effluents from the accidents, and (3) doses from exposure to the effluents. FMDose calculates doses from environmental measurements of activity in the air and on the ground. DecayCalc calculates activity of radionuclides present at a future time following decay and ingrowth. The current version of RASCAL includes computational techniques that are substantially modified from those used in the prior versions of RASCAL and significantly expands the capabilities of STDose. The major changes to STDose are (1) the inclusion of time-dependent source terms and source terms for fuel cycle and materials accidents, (2) the inclusion of radiological decay during atmospheric transport, (3) the addition of a UF6 atmospheric transport model, and (4) the ability to include meteorological data from multiple stations and the effects of terrain. The major changes to FMDose are the addition of emergency-worker guidance and derived intervention-level calculations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING REFORM AND
                         INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eloquent, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford A. Reid, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
        (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
        period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company
        for the period covered by the Report.


Date: November 11, 2002                 By: /s/ Clifford A. Reid
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Clifford A. Reid
                                            Chief Executive Officer