alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 7 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 96-1499

v. (D. Colorado)

KERI PORTER, also known as

Blacky,

Defendant - Appellant.

(D.C. No. 96-CR-86-Z) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Keri Porter entered a conditional guilty plea to the charge of possession

with the intent to distribute crack cocaine and was sentenced to 57 months’

imprisonment and five years’ supervised release. The single issue on appeal is

whether the penalty disparity between powder and crack cocaine as provided in 21

U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1 is constitutional. In particular, the

Defendant asserts that the penalty provisions are racially discriminatory in

violation of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth

Amendment, constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth

Amendment, and are void for vagueness. Appellant’s Br. at 5.

In raising this issue, the Defendant openly acknowledges that this circuit

has consistently upheld the penalty disparity between powder and crack cocaine in

the face of constitutional challenges, and asserts the only reason for bringing the

issue yet again before this court is to preserve the issue for possible review by the

United States Supreme Court. Appellant’s Br. at 5.

It is the law of this circuit that the penalty provisions outlined in 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1 are constitutional. See United States v.

Williamson, 53 F.3d 1500, 1503 (10th Cir. 1995) (holding that USSG § 2D1.1 is

not violative of equal protection); United States v. Ashley, 26 F.3d 1008, 1013

(10th Cir. 1994) (holding that the penalty disparity between powder and crack

cocaine does not violate due process or equal protection); United States v.
-3-

Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 951-52 (10th Cir. 1993) (holding that penalty disparity

between powder and crack cocaine does not violate due process and was not

enacted for a discriminatory purpose); United States v. Easter, 981 F.2d 1549,

1557-59 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) and USSG § 2D1.1

do not violate equal protection and are not void for vagueness); United States v.

Turner, 928 F.2d 956, 960 (10th Cir. 1991) (holding that penalty disparity

between powder and crack cocaine does not violate due process).

Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Licensing Board Denies Petition to Intervene in Oconee License Renewal

----

----

No. 98-234

December 30, 1998

**NRC LICENSING BOARD DENIES PETITION TO INTERVENEIN OCONEE LICENSE RENEWAL**

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety & Licensing Board has denied a request by the Chattooga River Watershed Coalition and three individuals for a hearing on Duke Energy Corporation's license renewal application for the Oconee nuclear power plant in South Carolina.

The licensing board, ruling that four contentions filed by three members of the coalition lacked merit, dismissed their petition to intervene in the licensing proceeding. The ruling may be appealed directly to the Commission.

Duke Energy filed an application on July 6 to renew for 20 years the operating license for its three Oconee plants, 30 miles west of Greenville, South Carolina. The operating license for Oconee Units 1 and 2 will expire in 2013; the operating license for Unit 3 will expire in 2014.

The Chattooga River Coalition was the only group that requested a public hearing on the license renewal application.

The text of the licensing board memorandum and order will be posted on the NRC's Internet homepage at: http:/www.nrc.gov.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order entered August 13, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00930

- CR

ALICE ANNETTE STEELE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 08

- 45120

- M



### O RDER

Appellant’s August 11, 2014 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s reply brief is

GRANTED . The time to file appellant’s reply brief is EXTENDED to September 10, 2014

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Devany, Dennis (OST) . gAnTMCIff OF 

From: Jeannie Blake Oeannieblake@gmail.com] ''NbPORTATION 

Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:25 PiVl ! •'i'T OPrRATIONS 

To: LaHood, Ray (OST) 

Cc: Kurland, Susan (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST); Sean.parnell 

Subject: Continuation of Alaska Airline Docket OST-1998-4899 ' '' 58 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

I would like to express my strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air 

service to Cordova, Alaska. 

Alaska's current pattern of service, using jet aircraft, meets crucial needs that would be difficult, if not 

impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with 

single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access 

the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 737-400 

combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this 

route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet carrier simply cannot provide. Further, the 737-

400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology precision technology,which 

enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and 

cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. In sum, Alaska's 

jet service is critical to the economic well being of our community. 

We are a commercial fishing family and we use Alaska Airlines to transport our direct market salmon to 

Anchorage, Seattle, California, and Arizona. Alaska Airlines services our business needs efficiently and 

professionally. Cordova is a small community and we must travel to Anchorage for many medical needs. Air 

transportation is crucial. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge the Department of Transportation to select Alaska Airlines to continue 

to provide essential air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for more than thirty 

years. 

Sincerely, 

Kory & Jeannie Blake 

POBox 1122 

Cordova, AK 99574 

907-424-7194
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01921]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice: Cancellation of Meeting Notice

January 28, 2015.
    The following Commission meeting has been cancelled. No earlier 
announcement of the cancellation was possible.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, January 29, 2015.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: It was determined by a unanimous vote of the 
Commissioners that the Commission consider and act upon the following 
in closed session: Brody Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. 
WEVA 2014-82-R, et al. (Issues include whether to grant the Secretary 
of Labor's Emergency Motion for Stay of ALJ's Order Dismissing Pattern-
of-Violations Notice.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-01921 Filed 1-28-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2021

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 9, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 9, 2022
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Karl Schneider, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  August 14, 2002

 

| /s/ Karl Schneider                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Karl Schneider                                      |
| Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2004

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR SHEDS-MULTIMEDIA VER SION 4 June 10, 2010

Uninstall Previous Versions It is recommended that you uninstall any earlier co pies of SHEDS Multimedia. Previous versions of Multimedia can be uninstalled using the Add/Remove Programs tool on your system Control Panel.

Installing SHEDS-Residential Insert the CD and use Windows Explorer to display t he files on it. Double click on the Residential setup file, named SHEDS_Residential_Set up_4.00.exe. Follow the installation instructions displayed. The defaults s hould suffice for most users. Once installed, click on the desktop icon created for SH EDS-Multimedia. This should launch

SAS with the SHEDS-Residential main window. Follow the SHEDS-Residential User

Guide to run the model.

Another way to launch SHEDS-Residential is to selec t in Windows: Start->All Programs->SHEDS Multimedia->SHEDS Multim edia 4.0

To uninstall SHEDS-Residential: Start->All Programs->SHEDS Multimedia->Uninstall SH EDS Multimedia 4.0

Installing SHEDS-Dietary Follow the same steps as above, but double-click on the Dietary executable setup file, named SHEDS_Dietary_Setup_1.0.exe. Once installed, click on the desktop icon created for SHEDS-Dietary. This should launch SAS w ith the SHEDS-Dietary main window. Follow the SHEDS-Dietary User Guide to run the model.

Another way to launch SHEDS-Dietary is to select in Windows: Start->All Programs->SHEDS Dietary 1.0->SHEDS Dieta ry 1.0 To uninstall SHEDS-Dietary: Start->All Programs->SHEDS Dietary 1.0->Uninstall S HEDS Dietary 1.0

Note to Users: SHEDS was developed to run in the 32-bit version of SAS. However, a version of SHEDS compatible with 64-bit SAS (“SAS f or x64-based systems”) is available upon request. Users running 32-bit SAS on an x64 Windows platform do not need the 64-bit version of SHEDS, as the normal SHE DS executables are compatible in

that case.

If you have any difficulties please contact:

Valerie Zartarian (617) 918-1541 Zartarian.Valerie@epamail.epa.gov

Jim Xue (919) 541-7962 Xue.Jianping@epamail.epa.gov

Or Kristin Isaacs (919) 406-2103
kisaacs@AlionScience.com
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                             |                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date:              January 12, 2007 |                                                                                             | /s/              Stephen J. Antol |
|                                | Stephen                    J. AntolChief                    Financial                    Officer |

----
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests

# Recent FOIA Requests for 2016

The following pages present chronological listings of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Requests submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during each month of the current fiscal year. These listings include the subject and reference number of each request. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 9, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 9, 2021
AFS-10-407-E 

Oct 18 2010 

 Exemption No. 7980E 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-13274 

Mr. William Lamar Elder 

Counsel 

China Airlines, Ltd. 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Elder: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7980, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated September 21, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of China Airlines, Ltd. (CAL) for an extension of Exemption No. 7980, as 

amended. That exemption from §§ 61.77(a) and (b) and 63.23(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations allows CAL’s airmen who operate certain U.S.-registered aircraft that are 

leased to a non-U.S. citizen, for carrying persons or property for compensation or hire, to be 

eligible for a special purpose pilot authorization and a special purpose flight engineer 

certificate, without holding a current foreign license or certificate issued by a foreign 

contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CAL. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7980, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition subject to the conditions and 

limitations below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. CAL’s airmen who operate under this exemption must hold appropriate licenses 

 or certificates issued by the Taiwan Civil Aeronautics Administration. 

2. CAL may operate its Boeing 747-400 aircraft (registration No. N168CL) under 

 this exemption. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7980, as amended, to 

February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Daniel R. DeFazio, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Velocity Express Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:January 14, 2005