alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  William  "Buck
Shrewsbury",  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, of
the Company, does hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ William "Buck" Shrewsbury
--------------------------------
William "Buck" Shrewsbury
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2008

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX  Holdings,  Inc.  and will be retained by TX  Holdings,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       77
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                            5
<LEGEND>
                                   Exhibit 27
                             Financial Data Schedule

                          TREASURY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
         This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted
    From Unaudited Financial Statements For The Period Ended October 31, 2000
   And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference To Such Financial Statements
                             Filed with Form 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                              FEB-1-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                                   201,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                                3,408,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               985,189
<PP&E>                                                          66,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (35,834)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               4,195,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          611,354
<BONDS>                                                        727,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         9,219
<OTHER-SE>                                                   4,751,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 4,195,997
<SALES>                                                        253,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               253,210
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               196,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               282,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             148,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (374,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (374,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .00


</TABLE>
# L_2015297EN.01000901.xml

| 13.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/9

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1127 of 10 July 2015 amending Annex II to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 184 of 11 July 2015
  )

On page 15, Annex, concerning the footnote (*) in Annex II to Directive 2008/98/EC, third subparagraph:

for:

‘The value of HDD (Heating Degree Days) should be taken as the average of annual HDD values for the incineration facility location, calculated for a period of 20 consecutive years before the year for which CCF is calculated. For the calculation of the value of HDD the following method established by Eurostat should be applied: HDD is equal to (18 °C — Tm) × d if Tm is lower than or equal to 15 °C (heating threshold) and is nil if Tm is greater than 15 °C; where Tm is the mean (Tmin + Tmax/2) outdoor temperature over a period of d days. Calculations are to be executed on a daily basis (d = 1), added up to a year.’,

read:

‘The value of HDD (Heating Degree Days) should be taken as the average of annual HDD values for the incineration facility location, calculated for a period of 20 consecutive years before the year for which CCF is calculated. For the calculation of the value of HDD the following method established by Eurostat should be applied: HDD is equal to (18 °C – Tm) × d if Tm is lower than or equal to 15 °C (heating threshold) and is nil if Tm is greater than 15 °C; where Tm is the mean (Tmin + Tmax)/2 outdoor temperature over a period of d days. Calculations are to be executed on a daily basis (d = 1), added up to a year.’.

---
No. 86-969.

#### Kanarek *v.*Wambaugh et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Flora V. M. Berry, Complainant, *vs.*John Walsh.

Cumberland County.

Decided July 20, 1922.

*Raymond S. Oakes,*for complainant.

*Sullivan & Sullivan,*for respondent.

This is a complaint in bastardy. When all the proper preliminary steps were complied with, necessary to the presentation of thé ease to the jury, the only defense was the admitted fact that within a few days after the alleged and admitted intercourse with the respondent the complainant had intercourse with another party.

The statute requires as a condition precedent to the maintenance of the complaint that the complainant, in travail, shall accuse the defendant of being the father of her child, and that she has been constant in such accusation.

These' things the complainant did, and upon this evidence and the admitted action on the part of the respondent the jury found a verdict in her favor, and the court cannot say that it is clearly wrong. Motion overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the
period ended  December 31, 2005 (the  "Report") of SMI Products,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James Charuk,  Chief Executive Officer of SMI Products,  Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated: April 3, 2006                         /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                             ___________________________
                                                 James Charuk
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7220

MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGENE SHINAULT; JACK LEE; LIEUTENANT MCCLANAHAN; SERGEANT VANDYKE; SERGEANT HORTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FIELDS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICERMCNERLIN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SANDSTROM; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIFE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LOONEY, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-504-7) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court’s orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Eury v. Shinault , No. CA-99- 504-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Replacement Energy Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants: 2020-2030 – Final Report (NUREG-2242)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2242, Final Report (PDF – 4.91 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2021**Date Published:** June 2021

Prepared by:K. Collison, ICFE. Gormsen, ICFR.F. Schofer, NRCDr. Boddu Venkatesh, ICF Project ManagerPamela Noto, NRC Project ManagerAmy Sharp, NRC Project Manager

ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.9300 Lee HighwayFairfax, VA 22031

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Replacement energy costs are estimated for the United States wholesale electricity market regions with nuclear electricity-generating units over the 2020–2030 report period. These estimates were developed to assist the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in evaluating proposed regulatory actions that (1) require safety modifications that might necessitate temporary reactor outages and (2) reduce the potential for the loss of generation associated with a possible severe reactor accident. Estimates were calculated using ASEA Brown Boveri’s (ABB’s) PROMOD model and ICF’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM) for North America. 

The models simulate dispatching a collection of generating units in merit order (i.e., lowest to highest incremental cost of dispatch) until the regional power demand is met. Each generating unit is characterized by the technology and fuel it uses to generate electricity, the unit’s heat rate, and the variable and fixed costs incurred in owning and operating the unit. To estimate the replacement energy cost, the report models a Reference Case, in which all operational nuclear power plants are generating, and an Alternative Case, in which a nuclear generating unit is taken offline so that the next unit in merit order is dispatched to replace the lost generation. The difference in market clearing prices between the two cases is the replacement energy cost.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 30, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# PlanningBasis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological EmergencyResponse Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-0396)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0396 (PDF - 3.71 MB)

## Publication Information

**Maunscript Completed:** December 1978**Date Published:** November 1978

H.E. Collins*, B.K. Grimes**, Co-Chairmen of Task Force F. Galpin***, Senior EPA Representative

*Office of State Programs **Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulation Commission Washington, DC 20555 ***Office of Radiation Programs U.S. Enivronmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460

Availability Notice

## Foreword

The purpose of this report is to provide a basis for Federal, State and local government emergency preparedness organizations to determine the appropriate degree of emergency response planning efforts in the environs of nuclear power plants. The report is the product of a Task Force of NRC and EPA representatives formed in 1976 to address this issue. The Task Force hopes that the guidance provided here will be used to supplement the extensive emergency planning guidance already published by NRC and EPA.

This report introduces the concept of generic Emergency Planning Zones as a basis for the planning of response actions which would result in dose savings in the environs of nuclear facilities in the event of a serious power reactor accident. Application of the Task Force guidance should result in the development of more uniform emergency plans from site to site but should not result in a large incremental increase in the resources required to implement the existing planning elements. This is particularly true of recently licensed plants where planning elements have been implemented at substantial distances from reactor sites.

This report represents a consensus view of the Task Force on the planning basis guidance and on a number of important issues related to emergency planning which were considered in the development of the guidance. As of the publication date of this report, these recommendations had not been formally adopted by the NRC or EPA and therefore represent only Task Force views. However, the concept of a generic area in which to plan has received general acceptance by the variety of groups commenting on drafts of this report. If adopted by the NRC, the Task Force expects that the key elements of the guidance would be incorporated in the NRC's primary emergency planning guidance publication for States and their local governments (NUREG-75/111) and therefore used by Federal agencies as a part of the basis for concurrence in State and local government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in support of power reactor facilities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Effective February 2011 Medium Truck Tires

19**Technical Bulletins Load/Inflation** **General Technical Light Truck** **Medium Truck**

•	 All dimensions taken with tire on measuring rim.

•	 Loaded dimensions and RPM measured at maximum dual load.

•	 For load and inflation tables see pages 92 through 97.

•	 For minimum dual spacing and approved rim widths see page 73.

•	 For ply ratings see table on page 71. Bridgestone tires and tubes are subject to an ongoing development program. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC retains the right to amend specifications at any time without notice or obligations. Please refer to rim manufacturer’s load and
inflation limits. Never exceed rim manufacturer’s limits without the consent of the component manufacturer. Te c h n i cal D ata

**M711**

11R22.5 G 265-225 125 8.25 41.9 10.7 19.6 11.8 496 26 2800@720 6175@105 2650@720 5840@105 75

11R22.5 H 283-681 125 8.25 41.9 10.7 19.6 11.8 496 26 3000@830 6610@120 2725@830 6005@120 75

12R22.5 H 265-241 143 9.00 43.3 11.5 20.2 12.7 480 28 3350@830 7390@120 3075@830 6780@120 75

11R24.5 G 265-233 133 8.25 43.9 10.7 20.6 11.8 473 26 3000@720 6610@105 2725@720 6005@105 75 **Tire Size Load**  **Range Article**  **Number Weight**  **(Lbs) Meas.**  **Rim Overall**  **Diam. Overall**  **Width Static**  **Loaded Radius**  **Overall Width**  **(Loaded) Revs**  **Per Mile**  **Tread Depth**  **(32") Max. Tire Load**  **(Single) Max. Tire Load**  **(Dual) Max.**  **Speed (MPH)**  **Kg/kPa Lbs/PSI**  **Kg/kPa Lbs/PSI**  

# M711 Drive Radial

•	 Deep tread depth for long original mileage.
•	 Staggered tread block design distributes forces

evenly to resist irregular wear

. •	 Aggressive traction pattern for solid grip in rain,

mud and snow

. Recommended Application A drive radial tire specifically designed for high traction and high scrub applications in:

•	 Long Haul Service

•	 Regional Haul Service

•	 Pickup & Delivery Service

•	 Light to Moderate On/Off-Highway Service

Replaces: Goodyear: G182, G338, G622, G124 Michelin: XDE M/S, XDN2, XD4
Exhibit 15.1



| |  |     
| |  | ----
| |  | LOGO

June 3, 2011

The Board of Directors

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

No. 1, R & D Road 1

Hsinchu Science Park

Hsinchu City, 30076

Republic of
China

Attention: Mr. S.J. Cheng

Dear Sirs,

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130230 on Form F-3 and Registration Statements Nos.
333-137838, 333-116670 and 333-85290 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the Company), and the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report). We also consent to the inclusion of our report in the Annual Report.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Moore
Stephens

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong
Exhibit 10.7


 


Legato
Merger Corp. 


777
Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New
York, New York 10017


 


[●],
2020


 


Crescendo
Advisors II, LLC


777
Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New
York, New York 10017


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of securities of Legato Merger Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation
by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration
Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Crescendo Advisors
II, LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by
the Company from time to time, situated at 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (or any successor location).
In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Crescendo Advisors II, LLC the sum of $15,000 per month on the Effective Date and
continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Crescendo Advisors II, LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may
have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not
seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	LEGATO MERGER CORP.
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: 	David
    D. Sgro
	 	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 	 
	CRESCENDO ADVISORS II, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:  	 
	 	Title:	 


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VitaCube Systems Holdings, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary Pat O'Halloran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/MARY PAT O'HALLORANMary Pat O'Halloran
Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

March 26,
2004

---

QuickLinks
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1990 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow food concessions at Stateowned interstate rest areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. BANKS of Indiana (for himself and Mr. COURTNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow food 

concessions at State-owned interstate rest areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REST AREAS. 

4 (a) FOOD CONCESSIONS.—Section 111(b)(2) of title 

5 23, United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and 

7 (E) as subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol9 lowing: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1990 IH

1 ‘‘(D) concessions, including restaurants, 

2 food services, and convenience stores;’’. 

3 (b) TAX REVENUES.—Section 111(b)(4) of such title 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Notwith5 standing the preceding sentence, a State may use revenues 

6 received from concessions under paragraph (2)(D) to sup7 port any program authorized under this title.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS