alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Commercial Radiopharmacy Licenses, Final Report (NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 2 (PDF – 3.54 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2019**Date Published:** March 2019

**Prepared by:**R. L. ElliottR. G. GattoneC. GrahamJ. F. KatanicL. Roldan-OteroT. Thompson

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for materials licenses for commercial radiopharmacies. In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to the NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

**Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**

This NUREG contains information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collections were approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval numbers 3150-0044; 3150-0014; 3150-0035; 3150-0017; 3150-0016; 3150-0001; 3150-0010; 3150-0214; 3150-0020; 3150-0009; 3150-0008; 3150-0120; and 3150-0028, respectively. Send comments regarding this information collection to the Information Services Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0044; 3150-0014; 3150-0035; 3150-0017; 3150-0016; 3150-0001; 3150-0010; 3150-0214; 3150-0020; 3150-0009; 3150-0008; 3150-0120; and 3150-0028) Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.

**Public Protection Notification**

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION(in thousands, except ratios)**

 
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | **Nine Months**                   | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                   | ** ** | **Ended September 30, 2005** | ** ** |
|                                                                         |       |                              |       |
| Net income  from continuing operations, less preferred distributions         |       | $                                 | 73,123     |   |
| Preferred  distributions                                                     |       | 34,859                            |       |
| Interest  expense                                                            |       | 88,946                            |       |
| Earnings before fixed charges                                                |       | $                                 | 196,928    |   |
|                                                                         |       |                              |       |
| Interest  expense                                                            |       | $                                 | 88,946     |   |
| Interest  costs capitalized                                                  |       | 5,823                             |       |
| Total fixed charges                                                          |       | $                                 | 94,769     |   |
|                                                                         |       |                              |       |
| Preferred  distributions                                                     |       | 34,859                            |       |
| Total fixed charges  and preferred distributions                             |       | $                                 | 129,628    |   |
|                                                                         |       |                              |       |
| **Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges**                                      | ** ** | **2.08**                          | ** ** |
|                                                                         |       |                              |       |
| **Ratio of  earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions** | ** ** | **1.52**                          | ** ** |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' JUNE 30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,352)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,210
<PP&E>                                       2,536,140
<DEPRECIATION>                               (146,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,531,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,265
<BONDS>                                        953,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,450,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,531,718
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,220
<CGS>                                           89,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 16th day of February, 2010.








CALVIN KANTONENCalvin L. KantonenChief Financial Officer
Specifications Avery International X6 Model 800 Hexacopter Multirotor Plat forms

X6 Model 800 Multirotor Aircraft SpecificationsThe VikingUAS X6 Model 800 Hexacopter is the most versatile hexacopter heavy lif t

multicopter on the planet with fixed hinge mounted booms with threaded fasteners this

frame minimizes vibration by 60% even in temperatures below -10F and upwards of

120F. The ease of taking a large multicopter and transporting can not be any easi er for

such a large multirotor.X6 Model 800 Frame FoldedFrame Extended

This frame is designed to be used and configured with ALL flight controllers curr ently on

the market our primary flight controllers are the DJI A2 Professional, PiX Hawk, DJI

Naza V2, UTC Piccolo Multirotor. This airframe is also designed to carry a nd integrated

parachute deployment system incase of a failsafe condition. Designed in Ame rica this is

one of the premier multirotors of 2015.Radio Specifications

### Attaching the Mooring System

1. The VikingUAS Mooring tether line needs to be fastened as close to the center of

the aerial vehicles CG in order to keep the line from making contact with the

propellers of the multi-rotor if using a balloon place as close to the center at the

bottom of the balloon or blimp.

2. If you do not have pre-drilled 1/8” hole in your aircraft you will need to drill one

for the 4-40 screw attachment to anchor the aluminum stand-off.

3. Once tether is attached and line is spooled out we recommend you to practice at

low level to get a feel for the tether on your aircraft. Each platform reacts

differently with the line which can easily be dialed in through the gains in yo ur

flight control software you can do this manually through the Skylark Radio follow

the instructions on sub-trim adjustment. The key is that your’re comfortable with

the flight characteristics to safely operate the platform. If at any t ime you do not

feel comfortable disconnect tether and seize flight operations immediate ly.

4. Operation above 149 feet AGL must comply with CFR 14 Part 101.13 (a) (1) (3) (4) and

(b) Part 101

. 17 (a) & (b).

5. Operation will be conducted with a minimum 150 foot Safety Perimeter where

nonparticipating personnel and property will not be allowed in t o the operational area.
#### THE STATE, TO THE USE OF N. S. JARRATT, vs. THOMAS McGEE & AL.

The receipt of a deputy sheriff, for a claim put in his hands for collection, is1 evidence against the sheriff in an action for failing to collect the claim. And as such a receipt binds the sheriff, it is, under the Act of 1844, competent evidence against his sureties as well as himself.

The eases of the *State*v. *Allen,*5 Ired. 36, and *State*v. *Fullenviider, 4*Ired. 364, cited and approved.

Appeal from tbe Superior Court of Law of Cherokee County, at the Spring Term, 1847, his Honor Judge Dick presiding.

This is an action of debt, on the sheriff’s bond, against him and his sureties, and was tried on the plea of conditions performed. The breach assigned was, the failure to collect a justice’s judgment, which the relator placed in the hands of one of the sheriff’s deputies • for collection. In support of his case, the relator offered in evidence the receipt of the deputy to the relator for the judgment, “ to collect or return,” and the counsel for the sureties objected, that it was not competent evidence against them ; but the Court admitted it and there was a verdict for the plaintiff From the judgment the defendants appealed.

*380
      *Gaither,*for the plaintiff.

*J. W. Woodfin,*for the defendants.

Ruffin, C. J.

There is no doubt upon this question of evidence. The Act of 1836, *Rev. Stat. c.*109, *c.*23, makes the sheriff and his sureties liable for claims placed in the hands of a deputy. The receipt of the deputy for the claim is evidence against the sheriff, when given in the discharge of official duties ; and this is a receipt of that kind. *State*v. *Allen, 5*Ired. 36, Indeed, the receipt of the deputy, being the act of an agent, is, in law, the receipt of the sheriff himself, and binds him accordingly - as if the deputy receive the money on an execution and give an acquittance therefor, or return satisfaction on the ie£ecution in the sheriff’s name. It is true, that in *Fui-leriwider s'case,*4 Ired. 364, \it was held, that a constable’s bgipt for a claim to collect was not evidence against sureties. But, profitably on account of that case, that ge|$!^altered by "the Act of 1844, which makes the ^acknowledgment of the sheriff, or any other ifther matter or thing, which is admissible ^competent also against his sureties. The redial, and this is the receipt of the sheriff, :ie meaning of the Act; and, at all events, it is '.an instrument, which is competent evidence against the sheriff, and it is, therefore, admissible against all the defendants.

Per Curiam Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) PROMULGATED UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ David HirschhornDavid HirschhornCo-Chief Executive Officer (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Co-Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40351

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

LARRY J. MUNYON ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 616

Filed: August 6, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John R. Stegner , District Judge. Hon. James D. Stow, Magistrate.

Order of the district court, in its appellate capacity, affirming the magistrate
court’s denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea, a ffirmed

.

R. D. Watson, Coeur d ’ Alene, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Daphne J. Huang, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ GRATTON, Judge

Larry J. Munyon appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate court’s

denial of his motion to withdraw guilty plea. We affirm.

Munyon pled guilty to misdemeanor driving under the influence and requested a withheld

judgment. The magistrate accepted his guilty plea

, but denied his request for a withheld

judgment. Judgment was entered on November 21, 2011. On January 3, 2012, Munyon filed a

motion to withdraw his guilty plea which the magis trate denied

. Munyon appealed the denial of

his motion to withdraw guilty plea, and the district court affirmed. This appeal followed.

As the State points out, the magistrate court did not have jurisdiction to hear Munyon’s

motion to withdraw guilty pl ea

. “ Absent a statute or rule extending its jurisdiction,” the trial

court’s jurisdiction ends “ either by expiration of the time for appeal or affirmance of the

judgment on appeal.” State v. Jakoski , 139 Idaho 352, 355, 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003). Since th e judgment in this matter was entered on November 21, 2011, pursuant to Idaho Appellate2 Rule 14(a) , the magistrate court’s jurisdiction expired forty

- two (42) days later, or on January 2,

2012. Idaho Criminal Rule 33(c) does not include any provision exte nding the jurisdiction of the

trial court for the purpose of hearing a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Jakoski , 139 Idaho at

355, 79 P.3d at 714. Therefore, the magistrate court did not have jurisdiction to consider

Munyon’s motion to withdraw guilty p lea filed on January 3, 2012. 1

The magistrate court lacked jurisdiction to hear Munyon’s motion and therefore, we

affirm the district court’s order , in its appellate capacity, affirming the magistrate court’s denial

of Munyon’s motion to withdraw guil ty plea.

Chief Judge GUTIERREZ and Judge LANSING CONCUR.

1 Munyon also filed a notice of appeal on February 28, 2012

, purportedly from the November 21, 2011

, judgment. This notice of appeal was similarly not timely. See I

. A

. R

. 14(a).
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


EXHIBIT 10.37
CALENDAR 2011 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
		
	Compensation Element
	Amount

	Board Cash Compensation
	Annual retainer - $80,000 1  
 

	Annual Equity Compensation
	Aggregate of $150,000 in value of stock options and restricted stock units determined as follows:
- A number of stock options valued at $50,000 at the time of grant calculated using the Company’s stock compensation valuation2 practices for financial reporting
- A number of restricted stock units calculated by dividing $100,000 by the closing stock price on the date of grant2  
- Both grants vest as to 25% of the shares subject thereto on the first four quarterly anniversaries of the date of grant

	Annual Lead Director Cash Compensation
	Additional retainer: $30,0001

	Committee Member Cash Compensation
	Annual retainer: 1
-Audit Committee: $15,000
-Compensation Committee: $10,000
-Nominating and Governance Committee: $10,000

	Annual Committee Chair Cash Compensation
	Additional retainer: 1
-Audit Committee: $15,000
-Compensation Committee: $10,000
-Nominating and Governance Committee: $10,000




 
 
 
 
_____________________________________
 
1 Directors may elect to receive cash retainers in the form of restricted stock units with value equal to 133% of the forgone cash compensation and which vest in full on the day immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders held following the grant date. 
2 Represents amount of equity granted to Board members elected at annual meetings of stockholders. For members appointed between annual meetings of stockholders, grant amounts are pro rated based upon the time between the last annual meeting of stockholders and the date of appointment.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  March 5, 2004 |  | /s/ C. Park    Shaper                                        |  |
|---------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                 |  | C. Park Shaper    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Report on the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station (NUREG-1250)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document 
        - NUREG-1250 (PDF - 28.9 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1987**Date Published:** January 1987

U.S. Department of Energy Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Electric Power Research Institute U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the compilation of information obtained by various organizations regarding the accident (and the consequences of the accident) that occurred at Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl in the USSR on April 26, 1986. Each organization has independently accepted responsibility for one or more chapters. The various authors are identified in a footnote to each chapter. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the report. Very briefly the other chapters cover: Chapter 2, the design of the Chernobyl nuclear station Unit,4; Chapter 3, safety analyses for Unit 4; Chapter 4, the accident scenario; Chapter 5, the role of the operator;Chapter 6,.an assessment of the radioactive release, dispersion, and transport; Chapter 7, the activities associated with .emergency actions; and Chapter, information on the health and environmental consequences from the accident. These subjects cover the major aspects of the accident that have the potential to present new information and lessons for the nuclear industry in general.

The task of evaluating the information obtained in these various areas and the assessment of the potential Applications has been left to each organization to pursue according to the relevance of the subject to their organization. Those findings will be issued separately by the cognizant organizations. The basic purpose of this report is to provide the information upon which such assessments can be made.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
cc: Anthony Lee Monroe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A mer.
#### COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, petitioner, v. Charles E. ASHE and Susan J. Ashe, etc., et al.

No. 81-1866.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Dec. 13, 1982.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States v. Security Industrial Bank,*459 U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 407, 74 L.Ed.2d 235 (1982).