alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED
October 30, 19 97 Cecil Crowso n, Jr. Ap pellate Co urt C lerk IN THE COURT OF

APPEALS OF

TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTION

AT KNOXVILLE

RONALD ST

EPHEN COFE

R, ) BRADLEY CIRCUIT ) Plaintiff/Appellee ) NO. 03A01-9705-CV -00173 ) v. ) ) LYNDA SUS AN DAVIS CO FER, ) HON. STE PHEN BEBB Defenda nt/Appella

nt ) JUDGE

) Defenda nt/Appella

nt ) AFFIRMED
D. Mitc hell Brya

nt, Cleveland, for

Appellant. Ron D. Powers, Chattanooga, for Appellee.



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
INMAN , Senior

Judge The appe llant argu es that (1) the Court e rred in a warding bo th parties a divorce, insisting that she should have been awarded a divorce; (2) the Court failed to a

ward her sufficient alimony; ( 3) the Cour t should have

awarde d the entire int erest in t he marita l residenc e to her, rather t han a 50 per

cent inter est; (4) the Court failed to award her a reasonable attorney fee. The record reveals that the marital estate was equitably and fairly divided and that the

award of alimony w as likewi se equitabl e and in kee ping with the circumst ances of t

he partie s. Since

the allow ance of a

ttorney fe es is ordina

rily a matter of judicial discretion, the record reveals no abuse of this judicial prerogative.1 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion. (b) Memorandu m Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges participati ng in the case, may affirm , reverse or modify the ac

tions of the trial c ourt by mem orandum opinio n when a forma l opinion w o uld have no precedential val ue. When a case is decided by mem orandum opinion it sh all be designat ed “MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION,” shall not be p ublished, and shall not b e cited or relied on for an y reason i n a subsequent unrelated case. [As am ended by order f iled April 22, 1992.] 2 This case is peculiarly adaptive to the application of R ULE 10, R ULES OF THE C OURT OF A PPEALS , 1 and the judgm ent is acc ordingly af

firmed a t the costs of the appe llant.

_________________ ________________ William H . Inman, Senior Jud ge CONCUR:

_________________

______________ Houston M. Goddard, PresidingJudge

_________________

______________ Hersche l P. Fra

nks, Judge
---

EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
  ACCOUNTING FIRM

---

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Medicure Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement (File No. 333- 146574) on Form S-8 of Medicure Inc., of
our report dated September 27, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Medicure Inc. as of May 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders
deficiency and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
May 31, 2011 which report appears in the May 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 20-F
of Medicure Inc.

Our report dated September 27, 2011 contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that the Company has experienced operating losses since
incorporation that raises significant doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants

September 27, 2011

Winnipeg, Canada

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffAgency Financial Report (NUREG-2220)

# Fiscal Year 2020 – Agency Financial Report (NUREG-2220, Volume 4)

        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2220, Volume 4 (PDF – 151 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** November 2020

Division of the ComptrollerOffice of the Chief Financial OfficerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Fiscal Year 2020 Agency Financial Report (AFR) presents the agency's financial results of operations which includes the audited annual financial statements of the NRC. The AFR also provides a summary of NRC program performance and cost. The information is presented in accordance with applicable statutes and OMB requirements in OMB Circular A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
EXHIBIT 31
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Herman Rappaport, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of STARMED GROUP, INC. certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of, STARMED GROUP, INC.(the "Company" or "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant to SECRelease 34-47986] for the registrant and have:
       (a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
       (b)     [Omittedpursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];
       (c)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
       (d)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
       (a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affectability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
       (b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: June 24, 2004        

/s/ Herman Rappaport
 
       

Herman Rappaport, President, CEO and CFO
 ****
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Grange, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 3, 2010



/s/ David L. GrangeDavid L. GrangeChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7698
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRYANT DUBOSE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-207-P) Submitted: April 28, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant DuBose, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. DuBose , Nos. CR-94-17; CA-97-207-P (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
369306/1/WASHINGTON

American Airlines, Inc. Alaska Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. 19300 International Boulevard Washington, D.C. 20036 Seattle, Washington 98188

March 15, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION Docket Operations and Media Management U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
Re: Joint Application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc. for Transfer of International Route Authority, Dockets DOT-OST-2015-0025, DOT-OST-2005- 20406 and DOT-OST-2010-0222 Ladies and Gentlemen: American Airlines, Inc. (“American”) and Alaska Airlines, Inc. (“Alaska”) submit this brief response to the unauthorized surreply filed by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) on March 13, 2015. 1 Unlike Delta, American and Alaska do not wish to prolong this proceeding and delay the Department of Transportation’s decision through the filing of unnecessary pleadings. Our joint reply cites decades of precedent supporting prompt approval of the pending transfer application, including the Horizon Air-San Juan Airlines route transfer case which involved neither certificate authority nor an airline merger. 2 Delta’s references in its surreply are distinguishable and unavailing. The Department has found repeatedly that market-based transactions involving the sale of international route authority—such as this one—should be approved promptly and without consideration of competing applications. American and Alaska strongly urge the Department to apply these precedents, and approve their pending application without further delay.

1 To the extent necessary, American and Alaska request leave to file this response, which will assist the Department in acting promptly on their pending route transfer application.

2 Joint Reply of Alaska Airlines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc. to Answer of Delta Air Lines, Inc. , March 6, 2015, p.5

## Scanned by SimplyScan for Android
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                   
|---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. 
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
|                 |  |  |  |    
|                 |  |  |  |     |  | By:                      |  | KESTREL HEAT LLC (General Partner)
|                 |  |  | 
|February 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ RICHARD F. AMBURY   
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Richard F. Ambury                 
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer           
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.           
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Star Gas Finance Company
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                             AGL CAPITAL TRUST II
                             --------------------


          This Certificate of Trust of AGL Capital Trust II is duly executed and
filed by The Bank of New York (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, and
Paul R. Shlanta and Thomas L. Gleason, each an individual, as trustees, to form
a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C.
                                                                 ---  -
(S) 3801, et seq.
          -- ---

1.  Name.              The name of the business trust being formed
    ----               hereby (the "Trust") is "AGL Capital Trust II."

2.  Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the
    ----------------   Trust which has its principal place of business
                       in the State of Delaware is as follows:

                       The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                       White Clay Center, Route 273
                       Newark, Delaware  19711

3.  Effective Date.    This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of
    --------------     the date of filing.

          In Witness Whereof, the undersigned, being the sole trustees of the
Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust.

Dated: March 20, 2001
                              THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                              as Delaware Trustee

                              By: /s/ William T. Lewis
                                  ------------------------
                              Name: William T. Lewis
                              Title: Senior Vice President


                              /s/Paul R. Shlanta
                              ------------------
                              Paul R. Shlanta, as Trustee


                              /s/ Thomas L. Gleason
                              ---------------------
                              Thomas L. Gleason, as Trustee
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 67530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26902]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8945]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Collecting Paradise: Buddhist Art of Kashmir and its 
Legacies''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Collecting Paradise: Buddhist Art of the 
Kashmir and its Legacies,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Mary & Leigh Block Museum of Art, 
Evanston, Illinois, from on or about January 13, 2015, until on or 
about April 19, 2015, the Rubin Museum of Art, New York, New York, from 
on or about May 22, 2015, until on or about November 30, 2015, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26902 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### Beierle, Inc., Appellant, vs. Berg, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Howard G. Brown*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Lockney, Lowry & Hunter*of Wau-kesha.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
!
"










 
   
  
   



#

$%&
' 
 
 
 
 !   
!



   
 (   
  )
*

*!




"


'



!



*




+*





!



(

,-(




!



 
 !  + 
 -./.-0. -(-.123 

 , -( 
  
  








7KH +RQRUDEOH :LOOLDP - +D\QHV 

IRU WKH 0LGGOH 'LVWULFW RI 7HQQHVVHH VLWW

4

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


56-) .07) 

999999999999

81,7(' 07$7(6 2) 20(5,&$

	



$1&< :2 -(%0$11

		

2
80


.3)

=%%%>%?)
< 

2
@24

35@2


A@1.--))328< 

 2B.03

999999999999




	  3! 5  0.-/.0 65 .20).- 
 )  2
$ 	

		

7KH LQGLFWPHQW LQ WKLV FDVH FKDUJHG GHIHQGDQW 1DQF\ -R 5HEPDQQ

ZLWK GLVWULEXWLRQ RI KHURLQ XQGHU  86&  D DQG PDGHDGGLWLRQDO UHIHUHQFH WR WKH SHQDOW\ VWDWXWH VHFWLRQ E& LQ ZKDWDSSHDUV WR EH D VWDQGDUG FLWDWLRQ 8QGHU WKH UXOH ILUVW DQQRXQFHG LQ -RQHVY 8QLWHG 6WDWHV  86   DQG VROLGLILHG LQ $SSUHQGL Y 1HZ-HUVH\  6&W   WKLV LQGLFWPHQW LV SUREDEO\ WHFKQLFDOO\GHILFLHQW ZLWK UHVSHFW WR WKH LI GHDWK UHVXOWV SURYLVLRQ IRXQG ZLWKLQ DQGDPRQJ WKH PDQ\ SRVVLEOH VHQWHQFLQJ IDFWRUV RI VHFWLRQ E& 7KHSDUWLHV KDYH QRW UDLVHG WKDW LVVXH DV SDUW RI WKLV DSSHDO KRZHYHU DQG ZHGHFOLQH WR DGGUHVV LW XQGHU WKRVH FLUFXPVWDQFHV

2000)2)8).30)2).02))6-.B:
)  2   
  3! 5 5.3.-2, 3.5.3.- 0.-/.0 65 .20).-)..00..
)23 - 0
 2000)2) 8).3 0)2).02))6-.B:
)2







1.--))
:
3:-




!$480DDE4#&

)


!
-


*
$%














$%2




!

(*

,-



-$$ 
 #$E   E 
&  +

 



-(


!$E	%
-





,-(






40


	
>$80$$=#4&




	 

6





* 

 
  
   

*
+


80DE4!







   
 
   $%   
  
 
 

  
 !
 
'





-!


F

 !

*


-





2


"








G

     
 




!





!




!

'F


'F
!
'


!
'




480'



6




'

 	

		

 
 G   
 
 
!   
   #

  (

( (

(&
(
(G$%	2

     

 



   
    '
 

 !



FG




#





&G$%E

5




G

   (( 
 
(

(

!



((G$%E

)





	

0


!




:
"

 
 GHI
 "
 

 2 
 


!'



     
  F G   
 4$% 0 $	E $	>> #$%%%& !

!

 
 
 "
     
 


G(

3
J

5
2
'


0*
2  #
 
  !& 
  
*
     
  
   
   '
  !  
(G$	>>#"

>$80

$E	&)





 GG  G G



(






!'
$	>

	 


   
!A

"
0


    
 




5   

 





+


  
 
  
! -( 
   
 
!
 
!    
 
  
  , -
  
   
)
*,-(









-(


!
"






!

!




!
 
 , -( 


,(-



**









(
 !   
  #4&
0

 'F 
 4 8




E 	

		

 !  

 
 
 

 
   
 "
  '

2
!





  

 
 !  
     ! 
 


 

 

  
!

>$80$	$	)




!




!"
!)


! 
    
 
 
  K 
  !

'



'
"
 )
"



 
 
   
   


!




!

"



 
!2




G

G!!!

"


"

)









  

  
 
 

 
!
(   
   !  0

	
	
4$%0$%%#$%%%&
4$%0$	E#$%%%&




)
'F


480

D$44 !


!








!


F!  
 4>    




!


	 
'

$>




F




'





5
2
 
 0*
 2  )

!
!
#

!&
    
  

'
! 
 >$ 80  $E	       


'
     


G

	
   	
 4$

0
 
  GG

'

!


80 D $E#& 
 
  


>
 
   

!!




'







 


 
 * 
  
 

GG

G
Docket No. OPPT-2004-0113 February 3, 2012 

EPA-DuPont MOU 

Page 2 of 2 OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program 

Index 

Quarterly MOU Status Report #4 Phase III – Future Work Plan 

Document/Report Title-Paper Copy No. of Pages* 

1 paper copy of the Quarterly MOU Status Report #4 228 pages 

Phase III - Future Work Plan, DuPont Washington 

Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related 

Environmental Assessment Program) 

Document/Report Title-Electronic Copy No. of Pages 

CD 1 of 1 containing the Quarterly MOU Status Report #4, 230 pages 

Phase III - Future Work Plan, DuPont Washington Works 

(OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental 

Assessment Program) as one PDF file titled, 

Quarterly MOU SR #4 Phase III – FWP 020312.PDF 

* Page count does not include blank pages caused by double-sided printing of the tables.
sugar 

(NH4)2SO4

NH3

separation of cell biomass cell broth

diamine solution

concentration

adjust pH base

salt

wastewater

DN5 product DN5

bioconversion

concentration

1,5-Pentanediamine Process (Non-CONFIDENTIAL)

distilled water recycle
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Heeralal, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 538]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered June 7, 1994.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marius Silvasan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc.

Date:  March 31, 2006

                                       By: /s/ Marius Silvasan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Marius Silvasan
                                           Chief Executive Officer