alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1  SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with this annual report of Kiska Metals Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason S. Weber, President, Chief Executive Officer & Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   ­­­­/s/ Jason S. Weber  Name: Jason S. Weber Title: President, Chief Executive Officer & Director May 20, 2011         EXHIBIT 13.2  SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with this annual report of Kiska Metals Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adrian Rothwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   ­­­­/s/ Adrian Rothwell  Name: Adrian Rothwell Title: Chief Financial Officer May 20, 2011
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed GE-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment, LLC Facility in Wilmington, North Carolina (NUREG-1938, Final Report)

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2015119EN.01000101.xml

| 12.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 119/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 119/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/745

of 4 May 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Hollandse geitenkaas (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘Hollandse geitenkaas’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Netherlands' application to register the name ‘Hollandse geitenkaas’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hollandse geitenkaas’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hollandse geitenkaas’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Hollandse geitenkaas’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 443, 11.12.2014, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David C. Gaziano, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[632 NYS2d 996]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Gaziano*(219 AD2d 870 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Parenti, J. — Unauthorized Use Motor Vehicle, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
HomeSite Help

# Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools

This page provides access to plugins, viewers, other tools that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) uses to present documents, datasets, and other files on the NRC’s public Web site. If you don’t already have this software on your computer, you may need to download one of these tools to view or use the non-HTML files available through our public Web site.

The vendors for these tools allow Web users to download their tools free of charge. Follow their instructions for downloading the tool(s) you need.

Some of the links on this page will take you away from the NRC’s Web site. In most cases, you can return to the NRC site by using the Back button in your browser's tool bar. If you regularly use the NRC page you are exiting, you may want to bookmark the page before you exit.

*Some of the links on this page are to non-NRC servers and websites and are provided solely as a reference for the convenience of users. NRC cannot guarantee the authenticity of documents or the validity of information obtained at these non-NRC websites. See our Site Disclaimer for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Index A-Z
          - Site Map
          - What's New On Our Site
          - Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools
          - Special Features
          - Electronic Submittals Application
          - Digital Accessibility Statement
          - Contact the NRC Webmaster
          - Privacy Policy
          - Site Disclaimer
          - For Developers

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 22, 2023
#### * WILLIAM GRANT, Adm’r, v. S. E. BURGWYN and another.

*Attachment*— Sufficiency *of Affidavit*— Service *by Publication.*

Where, in a proceeding by attachment, it appears from the *whole*record, that the provisions of the statute have been substantially complied with, the action will not be dismissed or the attachment dissolved.

Motion to dismiss the action heard at Spring Term, 1878, of Northampon Superior Court, before Seymour, J.

The plaintiff as administrator with the will annexed of Edmund Jacobs, deceased, brought this action for-a money demand, and the defendants moved to dismiss upon the ground that the summons which issued June 18th, 1877, returnable to Fall .Term of said Court, was not served, and, no alias was issued. His Honor found as a fact-from the evidence that service had been made by publication. The defendants also moved to dissolve an attachment which had theretofore issued upon an affidavit made on the 18th of. June, 1877, in which the plaintiff stated that a summons had been issued and returned not served — defendant not to be found, &c. — ; that defendant was a non-resident but had property in this State, and was indebted to plaintiff’s testator in a certain ampunt for which a cause of action exists, *&o.*His Honor refused the motion and the defendants appealed.

*Messrs. W: Bagley, J. B. Batchelor*and *Muller^*Moore, for plaintiff;

*Messrs. W. G. Bowen*and *T. N.*Sill, for defendants;

*

 Smith C. J. did not sit on the hearing of this case.

Faircloth, J.

The defendants entered a special appearance and moved: (1) To dismiss the action because there *514was no service of the summons returnable to Fall Term, 1877, and no alias issued. (2) To dissolve the attachment for want of sufficient affidavits. The attachment issued before said Fall Term. In regard to the first motion His Honor after setting out the evidence finds as a fact, that service was had by publication, and on examination of the *whole*record we think his finding was correct and his refusal of the motion is sustained. In regard to the second motion we are of the same opinion. The affidavit of June the 18th is in the very words of the statute and that must be sufficient. In looking at the whole record it appears "that the statute on this subject has been substantially complied with.

No error. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Charter Renewal

    In accordance with Title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the 
Charter for the National Cancer Institute Council of Research Advocates 
(formerly known as the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group) was renewed for an additional two-year period on August 
17, 2014.
    It is determined that the National Cancer Institute Council of 
Research Advocates is in the public interest in connection with the 
performance of duties imposed on the National Institutes of Health by 
law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and 
counsel of this group.
    Inquiries may be directed to Jennifer Spaeth, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail Stop Code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8aba8b9bdacb0b298b7bcf6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e2d2e3f3b2a36341e313a7030373670393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01976 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### ANDREW LOVE vs. JACOB RAMSOUR.

The Act of Assembly, requiring the payment of certain moneys by the county of Lincoln to the county of Gaston, (referred to in *Love*v *Schcnclc, ante*p. 304) applies only to such persons as had thefund, or a part of it, in hand at the passing of the Act, or might have it afterwards. It does not charge one, through whose hands the money had merely passed, and from whom it had been taken by the Court before the enactment of the Statute.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Mecklenburg County, Spring Term, 1849, his Honor Judge Ellis presiding.

This case is similar to that or *Love*v *Schenck,*decided at this Term, except that the defendant was appointed County Trustee for Lincoln County, in March, 1846, and in the summer after, the sheriff of the county, by order of the County Court, paid to the defendant the sum of $1200-, which he then had of the fund, raised since March, 1842, for the purpose of building a Court House and Jail in Lincoln; and except further, that on or before the 1st of September, 1846, the defendant, by order of the County Court, disbursed the whole of that sum in the payment of debts of Lincoln county, then including what is now Gaston county. After demand made, the plaintiff -brought this suit in the Spring of 1848, for $800. There was judgment for the defendant on the case agreed, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Craig*and *Lander*for the plaintiff.

*Guión*and *Thompson,*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

The judgment must be affirmed. The act gives an action against *“*the treasurer of public buildings or such officer of Lincoln as may have the lima in charge and it appears that the defen bnt was neither the *329one nor the other. The act only applies to such persons as had the fund, or a part of it, in hand at the .passing of the act, or might have it afterwards. It could not charge the defendant upon the ground merely, that the money had passed through-his hands and been taken from him by the Court before the enactment of the statute.

Per Curiam. ' Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2021

# Recent FOIA Requests - November 2021

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during November 2021. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

----

i

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 30, 2021
#### Schlueter and another, Appellants, vs. Whealon and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Samuel E. Gross*of Milwaukee, and *John E. O’Brien*of Fond du Lac.

For the respondents : *Duffy, Duffy & Hanson*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 14, 2011

y1011 

# Order

October 14, 2011

143775

SC: 143775 In re T. R. COLLINS, Minor. COA: 300227 Oakland CC Family Division:
10-767430-NA

___________________ ________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 1, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of Two-Phase Critical Flow Models Performance in RELAP5 and TRACE Against Marviken Critical Flow Tests (NUREG/IA-0401)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0401 (PDF - 5.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2011**Date Published:** February 2012

**Prepared by:** Lukasz Sokolowski Tomasz Kozlowski

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The project aims to (1) conduct the validation of thermal-hydraulics codes RELAP5 Mod 3.3 Patch 03 and TRACE v5.0 Patch 2 on the critical flow experiment giving comprehensive knowledge about the codes' behavior; (2) provide information about sensitivity impact of user-defined variables of critical two-phase models implemented into the codes; (3) and to obtain statistical data for variety of length-to-diameter L/D ratios of pipe. The experimental set-up consisted of vessel, discharge pipe and the group of test nozzles. The vessel was 24.5 m high, with internal average diameter of 5.2 m. The discharge pipe was 6.308 m long with internal diameter of 0.72 m. A total number of nine nozzles was used in the experiment and is characterized by L/D ratios of 0.3, 1.0, 1.5, 1.7, 3.0, 3.1, 3.6 and 3.7. The main conclusions of the studies are that for Marviken Critical Flow Test (CFT) (i) RELAP5 Henry-Fauske model gives more accurate results than RELAP5 Ransom-Trapp (R-T) model; (ii) TRACE R-T gives better results than RELAP5 R-T; and (iii) the dependence between length-to-diameter L/D ratio of the nozzle and the calculation’s accuracy has not been observed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2015281EN.01001201.xml

| 27.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1925

of 26 October 2015

amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2016. The Council will carry out a review of the situation with regard to the restrictive measures after six months. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2016. The Council will carry out a review of the situation with regard to the restrictive measures after six months.

| (3) | Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2016. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Ronald Reagan, America Strike Groups Conduct Integrated Operations in 7th Fleet

USS Ronald Reagan Strike Group, America Expeditionary Strike Group Conduct Integrated Operations in U.S. 7th Fleet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
DISMISS; Opinion Filed January 8, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01593

- CV

HOLLINGSWORTH SAND & GRAVEL, L.L.C. , Appellant
V. B&R SYSTEMS, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 05735

- E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Evans Opinion by Justice Moseley
The clerk’s record in this appeal has not been fi led because appellant has not paid the

required fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 5

. 3(a). Despite being warned by letter dated November 7,

2013 that the appeal would be dismissed if appellant did not file written verification of payment

of the clerk’s fee, appel lant has not communicated with the Court. Because nothing in the record

shows appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the fee, we dismiss the appeal. See id.

37.3(b), 42.3(b)(c).

121593F.P05 /Jim Moseley/
JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HOLLINGSWORTH SAND & GRAVEL, LLC, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01593

- CV V.

B&R SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 05735

- E. Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley. Justices Bridges and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee B&R Systems, Inc. recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Hollingsworth Sand & Gravel, LLC.

Judgment entered this 8th day of January, 2014.

/Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE