alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 10, 2008 | /s/ Levy  Gerzberg                     |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                 | Levy Gerzberg                          |
|                                 | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Brandys, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zeolite Mining Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 24th day of September, 2003.



| | /s/ Alan Brandys
Alan Brandys
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of February, 2005.

| | /s/ John Brian Nichols 
John Brian Nichols
Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRadioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-2907)

# Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants: Annual Report 2010 (NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 16)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 16 – (PDF - 2.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2017**Date Published:** May 2018

**Prepared by:** J. Davis

Oak Ridge Associated Universities 1299 Bethel Valley Road, SC-200, MS-21 Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Steven Garry and Micheal Smith, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

There are 104 commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) licensed to operate on 65 sites in the United States (U.S.) regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each year, each power reactor sends a report to the NRC that identifies the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents discharged from the facility. In 2010, these effluent reports comprised about 10,000 pages of information, which described the radioactive materials discharged, as well as the resulting radiation doses to the general public. This report summarizes that information and presents the information in a format intended for both nuclear professionals and the general public.

The reader can use this report to quickly characterize the radioactive discharges from any U.S. NPP in 2010. The radioactive effluents from one reactor can be compared with other reactors. The results can also be compared with typical (or median) effluents for the industry, including short-term trends and long-term trends.

Reference information is included so the reader can compare the doses from NPP effluents with the doses the general public receives from other sources of radiation, such as medical procedures, industrial devices, and natural materials in the environment.

Although all NPPs released some radioactive materials in 2010, all effluents discharged were within the NRC's public dose limits, and NRC ALARA criteria. Additionally, the doses from radioactive effluents were much less than the doses from other sources of natural radiation that are commonly considered safe. This indicates radioactive effluents from NPPs in 2010 had no significant impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# L_2016073EN.01010901.xml

| 18.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/109

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2265 of 7 December 2015 opening and providing for the management of autonomous Union tariff quotas for certain fishery products for the period 2016-2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 322 of 8 December 2015
  )

On page 7, Annex, the entry concerning Order No 09.2761:

for:

| ‘09.2761 | ex 0304 79 50 | 10 | Blue grenadier (Macruronus Novaezelandiae), frozen fillets and other frozen meat, for processing (1) (2) | 17 500 | 0 % | 1.1.2016–31.12.2018’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ex 0304 95 90 | 11 |

‘09.2761

ex 0304 79 50

10

Blue grenadier (Macruronus Novaezelandiae), frozen fillets and other frozen meat, for processing (1) (2)

17 500

0 %

1.1.2016–31.12.2018’

ex 0304 95 90

11

read:

| ‘09.2761 | ex 0304 79 50 | 10 | Blue grenadier (Macruronus spp.), frozen fillets and other frozen meat, for processing (1) (2) | 17 500 | 0 % | 1.1.2016–31.12.2018’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ex 0304 79 90 | 11
  17 |
| ex 0304 95 90 | 11
  17 |

‘09.2761

ex 0304 79 50

10

Blue grenadier (Macruronus spp.), frozen fillets and other frozen meat, for processing (1) (2)

17 500

0 %

1.1.2016–31.12.2018’

ex 0304 79 90

11

17

ex 0304 95 90

11

17

---
HomeRadioactive WasteDecommissioningWhat's New in Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

# Contact Us About What's New in Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 12, 2022
# L_2017156EN.01003801.xml

| 20.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/38

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 11 of 17 January 2015
  )

On page 51, in Article 3(27):

for:

‘
  ‘promotional bank’ means any undertaking or entity set up by a Member State, central or regional government, which grants promotional loans on a non-competitive, not for profit basis in order to promote that government's public policy objectives, provided that that government has an obligation to protect the economic basis of the undertaking or entity and maintain its viability throughout its lifetime, or that at least 90 % of its original funding or the promotional loan it grants is directly or indirectly guaranteed by the Member State's central or regional government;’,

read:

‘
  ‘promotional bank’ means any undertaking or entity set up by a central or regional government of a Member State, which grants promotional loans on a non-competitive, not for profit basis in order to promote that government's public policy objectives, provided that that government has an obligation to protect the economic basis of the undertaking or entity and maintain its viability throughout its lifetime, or that at least 90 % of its original funding or of the promotional loan it grants is directly or indirectly guaranteed by that government;’.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT; ERNST & YOUNG LLP


The Board of Directors
Autologic Information International, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Autologic Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 4,
2001, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month periods ended February 4, 2001 and January 28, 2000, the condensed
consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the three-month period ended
February 4, 2001, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for
the three-month periods ended February 4, 2001 and January 28, 2000. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States,
which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Autologic
Information International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of November 3, 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated
December 8, 2000, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of November 3, 2000, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.



February 23, 2001
Woodland Hills, California




                                       14
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the
Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson     
|Kirk A. Benson         
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|February 3, 2010       
|                       
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart  
|Steven G. Stewart      
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 3, 2010
October 21, 2015

Mr. Todd Livdahl

PO Box 27602

Anaheim

, CA 92809

Dear Mr. Livdahl :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

sections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2870 , but we are unable

to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exempt ion would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

Fo r more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
# L_2015094EN.01000801.xml

| 10.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 94/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 94/8

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/552 of 7 April 2015 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 1,3-dichloropropene, bifenox, dimethenamid-P, prohexadione, tolylfluanid and trifluralin in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 92 of 8 April 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 92 of 8 April 2015

On page 22, Article 2:

for:

‘Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were lawfully produced before 28 April 2015.’

,

read:

‘Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were lawfully produced before 28 October 2015.’

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Characterization of Radioactive Slags (NUREG-1703)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1703 (PDF - 17.7 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2004**Date Published:**October 2004

**Prepared by:** L.A. Veblen,1,2 D. Farthing,2 E. O'Donnell,1 J.D. Randall1

1 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21218

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Slag samples from three humid region sites located in the Eastern United States were studied in detail. Since this investigation is generic in nature, the precise locations of the sites are not identified and are referred to as Sites A, B, and C. Site A's slag was formed from a reprocessed Nb-Ta slag that was ground, leached and deposited in settling ponds which were allowed to evaporate. The resulting material was a "rock like," porous, altered material that resembled a sandstone. Site B was the most intensively studied site and it provided valuable information on the physical and chemical form of the original Nb and Ta slag, as well as the Sn slag that was used as the "ore" material. Site C's slag, although not studied in as much detail as the Site B slag, is physically similar to the Site B slag and both sites had (i) glassy slag and (ii) dense dark slags that ranged from fine grained to very coarsely crystalline. Detailed microanalytical data from Sites B and C provide information regarding the degradation of the radionuclide-bearing phases. Uranium and thorium are present in glass, perovskite, calzirtite, zirconolite, and pyrochlore. Cerium and thorium are present in hibonite. These phases are similar to phases in the proposed high-level radioactive waste form SYNROC. Numerous studies provide experimentally determined solubility and leach rates for these phases. These data provide insight into and bounding values for estimates of slag leach rates. Data reduction and a detailed petrological study provide the necessary information for guidance to the NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards for license termination at future decommissioning sites.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Clare, Appellant, vs. Miller, Administrator, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Kopp & Brunckhorst*of Platteville.

For the respondent: *Harry E. Carthew*of Lancaster.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-15-006]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

February 5, 2015 at 2 p.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Review) (Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on February 24, 2015.

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

 Issued: January 21, 2015.

By order of the Commission.

 William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01387 Filed 1-22-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1941 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make the exception for 

returning workers permanent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make 

the exception for returning workers permanent, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Returning Worker Ac5 countability Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RETURNING WORKER EXCEPTION MADE PERMA7 NENT. 

8 Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘who has already been counted toward the numerical limimstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1941 IH

1 tation of paragraph (1)(B) during fiscal year 2013, 2014, 

2 or 2015 shall not again be counted toward such limitation 

3 during fiscal year 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘shall not be count4 ed toward the numerical limitation of paragraph (1)(B) 

5 for a fiscal year if that alien has already been counted 

6 toward such limitation during any of the 3 fiscal years 

7 immediately preceding that fiscal year’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS