alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# The Development and Application of TRACE/PARCS Model for Lungmen ABWR (NUREG/IA-0434)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0434 (PDF - 3.00 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2013**Date Published:** December 2013

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Chia-Ying Chang*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, Taiwan

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., HsinChu, Taiwan

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

TRACE code developed by US NRC is an advanced thermal hydraulic system code for nuclear power plant safety analysis. The feature of 3-D reactor vessel simulation in TRACE allows complex flow modeling and this kind of vessel is employed in Lungmen TRACE model. PARCS is a multi-dimensional neutronic simulator which is able to incorporate a 3-D reactor core with one-to-one fuel assembly simulation for the realistic representative. The state-of-the-art is that PARCS is capable of being coupled to TRACE, which provides the temperature and flow field information to PARCS during calculations. In this research, the TRACE/PARCS model of Lungmen nuclear power plant is established first. Then, the TRACE/PARCS model is used for two transient analyses - 3 RIPs trip and HPCF inadvertent startup. These events could test the ability of the coupling of TRACE and PARCS. Moreover, SNAP, a user-friendly interface developed by the US NRC and APT, provides users a graphical working environment and enables to animate the simulation as an alternative presentation of calculation results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Assessment of Current Test Methods for Post-LOCA Cladding Behavior  (NUREG/CR-7139, ANL-11/52)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7139 (PDF - 3.53 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2011**Date Published:** August 2012

**Prepared by:** M. C. Billone

Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439

H. H. Scott, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code V6199

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Test methods to assess fuel-rod cladding behavior following a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) are compared and evaluated. For non-deformed cladding regions with uniform levels of hydrogen content and oxidation, the three-point bend test (3-PBT) is a very good test for ductility determination of as-fabricated and pre-hydrided cladding subjected to LOCA oxidation and quench. For irradiated cladding, the ring compression test (RCT) has clear advantages over the 3-PBT because the required sample length is only about one-tenth of that needed for the 3-PBT. Overall, the RCT is the best test method for generating ductility data for assessing the effects of irradiation and hydrogen pickup on embrittlement oxidation threshold. However, neither 3-PBTs nor RCTs are useful for evaluating the performance of ballooned and ruptured cladding with significant axial gradients in cladding geometry, oxidation level, and hydrogen content, as well as circumferential gradients in wall thickness and oxidation level within the rupture region. Partially restrained axial contraction tests are useful for determining the fracture/nofracture boundary for ballooned, ruptured, oxidized, and quenched cladding as a function of hydrogen content and oxidation level. The four-point bend test (4-PBT) is best for determining three cladding performance metrics: maximum bending moment (measure of strength), failure energy (measure of toughness), and offset displacement (measure of plastic deformation).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 19, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1784

Lower Tribunal No. 18-36911

________________

Joseph P. Klock, Jr., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Citibank, N.A., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for MiamiDade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge.

Obront Corey, PLLC, and Michael James Corey; Rasco Klock Perez 

& Nieto, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., Susan E. Klock and Juan Carlos 

Antorcha, for appellants.

Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee), William P. 

Heller (Fort Lauderdale), and Eric M. Levine (West Palm Beach), for 

appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ. 
2

PER CURIAM.

Joseph P. Klock, Jr., and Susan M. Klock appeal from a nonfinal 

order denying their motions to disqualify Akerman LLP from representing 

Citibank in this foreclosure action. Based on the contested allegations 

presented, the trial court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing. 

Joseph and Susan M. both filed affidavits which create an issue (or issues)

of fact material to the propriety of Akerman’s disqualification. Joseph’s 

affidavit avers that he discussed the legal and factual matters underlying 

this case with his sister, Kathy Klock, an attorney who has been a partner 

at Akerman since 2014. Joseph relies on the facts as presented in his 

affidavit to claim an attorney-client relationship with his sister Kathy and a 

resulting irreconcilable conflict with Akerman’s representation of Citibank in 

this case. Kathy’s affidavit, on the other hand, explains that no 

conversations occurred between her and her brother Joseph related to this 

case or previous foreclosure cases involving the same property, either 

before or after her arrival at Akerman, that could constitute an attorneyclient relationship or otherwise give rise to a disqualification of the entire 

firm. 

The current judge who will be tasked with making the ultimate 

determinations of fact abused his discretion in not conducting an 
3

evidentiary hearing under these circumstances. See Krumholz v. 

Guardianship of HK, 114 So. 3d 341, 343 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing 

Alvord v. Alvord, 572 So. 2d 925, 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Moore v. Dep't 

of Health & Rehab. Servs., 664 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)). A

trial judge may not rely on the record of an evidentiary hearing before a 

predecessor judge when the current judge will be required, as here, to 

make factual findings and assessments of credibility. See id. Accordingly, 

we quash the order on appeal and remand to the trial court to conduct the 

requisite evidentiary hearing.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson                                        
|Kirk A. Benson Chief Executive Officer February 6, 2009   
|                                                          
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart                                     
|Steven G. Stewart Chief Financial Officer
February 6, 2009
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AQUA 1 POOLS & SPAS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ORLANDO HURTADO and NAHIMA HURTADO,

Appellees.

No. 4D23-761

[August 10, 2023]

Nonfinal appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit, Broward County; Kim Theresa Mollica, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CONO22-001726.

Jacqueline C. Ledón of Ledón Law, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Scott J. Edwards of Scott J. Edwards, P.A., Boca Raton, and Andrew 

Rader of Cutler Rader, P.L., Coral Springs, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALVIN MILLER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-756

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 2, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Reinaldo Ojeda, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nile Therapeutics, Inc.
(the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 3, 2010





/s/
      Daron EvansName:
      Daron EvansTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH LOUIS DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00552-LMB-1; 1:16-cv-00633-

LMB)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Louis Davis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Louis Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of 

a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1892 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the 

flying of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death 

of a first responder in the line of duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1892 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Hometown 

3 Heroes Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF5 STAFF IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF A 

6 FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 

7 DUTY. 

8 (a) AMENDMENT.—The sixth sentence of section 

9 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘possession of the 

11 United States’’ and inserting a comma; 

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘or the death of a first re13 sponder working in any State, territory, or posses14 sion who dies while serving in the line of duty,’’ 

15 after ‘‘while serving on active duty,’’; 

16 (3) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘former officials of 

17 the District of Columbia’’ and inserting a comma; 

18 and 

19 (4) by inserting before the period the following: 

20 ‘‘, and first responders working in the District of 

21 Columbia’’. 

22 (b) FIRST RESPONDER DEFINED.—Such subsection 

23 is further amended— 

24 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, United 

25 States Code; and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1892 RFS

1 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(4) the term ‘first responder’ means a ‘public 

6 safety officer’ as defined in section 1204 of the Om7 nibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 

8 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this Act shall apply with respect to deaths of first respond11 ers occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 

12 Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
PPO Registrant Focus Meeting Notes - Docket 

May 2, 2013 2:00-3:30 pm

Non-EPA attendees

Dave Ludwig (ABERCO/Balchem)

Chris Klosen (ABERCO/Balchem)

Joanne Cashin (ABERCO/Balchem)

Gabrielle Ludwig (California Almond Board)

Sheryl Dolan (ACTA Group)

Susan Hunter-Youngren (ACTA Group) –calling in 

Ed Hosoda (Cardinal Professional Products) – calling in 

EPA Team – see attached list for meeting attendees

RD: Heather Garvie, Cynthia Giles-Parker (BC), Driss Benmhend (Acting PM)

PRD: Garland Waleko/Andrea Mojica, Cathryn Britton, Kevin Costello (BC)

HED: Angela Howard, Ivan Nieves, Susan Hummel, Thurston Morton, Charles Smith, Jeff Dawson, Elissa 

Reaves (BC)

EFED: Sajutha Sankula, Ed Odenkirchen (Acting BC), Stephen Carey, He Zhong, Gabe Rothman 

BEAD: Len Yourman, Sepehr Haddad, Monisha Kaul, Michelle Ranville

1. PPO Amendment Action Meeting 2:00-2:45

The registrants had several questions regarding the technical screen for EPA reg #47870-

3, Amendment Action to Revise Buffer Zones. EPA and the registrants discussed how to 

address the deficiencies identified in the screen. 

2. Focus Meeting 2:45-3:30

The purposed of a focus meeting is to clarify use and label uncertainties early in the 

registration review process. Several commodity/space fumigant questions were 

provided to the registrant ahead of the meeting (attached to these notes) regarding PPO

use, application, emissions, monitoring, and exposure, and these were discussed 

primarily in the context of the nut uses. The registrants will also provide written answers 

to the questions to assist EPA. 

3. Wrap up and Next Steps 

- Preliminary Work Plan (PWP) will be posted when docket opens in December 2013

- Registrant should submit all use information that will assist EPA in completing the PWP 

to Garland Waleko in PRD, waleko.garland@epa.gov. 

- All information related to the current amendment action should be submitted to the RD 

Project Manager, Heather Garvie garvie.heather@epa.gov.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Capture of E-mail Records (NUREG/BR-0338)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0338 (PDF - 664.11 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** December 2007

 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-31090

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

CHARLES ELGIN STANLEY

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:01-CR-30013-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Stanley appeals from the district court’s revocation

of his supervised release for failure to pay court-ordered

restitution for child support payments. Stanley argues that the

district court erred in revoking his supervised release because

he is indigent. He further argues that the court’s revocation

violates his right to Equal Protection under the Fifth Amendment.
No. 04-31090

-2-

The Government argues that, due to Stanley’s release and the

fact that he is no longer subject to any further term of

supervised release, Stanley’s appeal is moot.

“Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since

it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live

case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278

(5th Cir. 1987); see Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). 

Because the record reflects that Stanley has been released and is

not subject to any term of supervised release, there is no case

or controversy for this court to address. Cf., United States v.

Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 928 (5th Cir. 2001).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.3 Model Assessment of Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant with SNAP Interface (NUREG/IA-0472)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0472 (PDF – 11.5 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2016**Date Published:** October 2017

**Prepared by:** Chunkuan Shih, Jong-Rong Wang, Shao-Wen Chen, Hao-Chun Chang, Show-Chyuan Chiang*, and Tzu-Yao Yu*

Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University; Nuclear and New Energy Education and Research Foundation 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., HsinChu, Taiwan

*Department of Nuclear Safety, Taiwan Power Company 242, Section 3, Roosevelt Rd., Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

RELAP5 is a very important analysis tool for Taiwan Power Company and is still used for the transient analysis of the Taiwan NPPs. The version of RELAP5 for Taiwan Power Company is RELAP5/MOD3.3 and the input deck of RELAP5 is established by the ASCII files. Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP) is an interface of NPP analysis codes which developed by U.S. NRC and Applied Programming Technology, Inc. Different from the traditional input deck in ASCII files, the graphical control blocks and thermal hydraulic connections make researches comprehend the whole power plant and control system more easily. Additionally, for the last few years, the TRACE/SNAP model of Maanshan NPP was developed and several kinds of transient events were performed. Based on the past research experience and SNAP advantages, the RELAP5/MOD3.3 model of Maanshan NPP was developed with SNAP interface in this research. Maanshan NPP is located on the southern coast of Taiwan. Its nuclear steam supply system is a type of PWR designed and built by Westinghouse for Taiwan Power Company. A startup test data and two transient results were used to compare with the results of RELAP5/MOD3.3 model for the new-developed analysis model assessment. The predictions of RELAP5/MOD3.3 were consistent to the startup test and historical transient data results. It indicates that there is a respectable accuracy for the Maanshan NPP RELAP5/MOD3.3 model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Seismic Safety Margins Research Program Phase I Final Report (NUREG/CR-2015, UCRL-53021)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021