alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015084EN.01002201.xml

| 28.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/22

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/524

of 27 March 2015

correcting the Bulgarian version of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 concerning administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (1) and, in particular Articles 14, 32, 48 and 49 and Article 51(1) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | The Bulgarian version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 (2) contains an error. The words ‘on the territory of the European Union’ need to be deleted from Articles 2 and 3. Therefore a correction of the Bulgarian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Bulgarian version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 79/2012 (2) contains an error. The words ‘on the territory of the European Union’ need to be deleted from Articles 2 and 3. Therefore a correction of the Bulgarian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.

2

| (2) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Concerns only the Bulgarian version.)

(Concerns only the Bulgarian version.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2015.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  OJ L 268, 12.10.2010, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 29, 1.2.2012, p. 13.

2

---
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2021

# Recent FOIA Requests – January 2021

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during January 2021. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 25, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-04-2015]

      ( print page 5507)    
Georgia Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 26, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Mizuno USA, Inc. (Mizuno), located in Braselton, Georgia. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on January 15, 2015.

The Mizuno facility is located within Site 31 of FTZ 26. The facility is used for golf club assembly. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board.

Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Mizuno from customs duty payments on the foreign status components used in export production. On its domestic sales, Mizuno would be able to choose the duty rate during customs entry procedures that applies to golf clubs (duty rate—4.4%) for the following foreign status inputs: golf club heads, shafts and grips (duty rate—4.9%). Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign status production equipment.

Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is March 16, 2015.

                    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the “Reading Room” section of the FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Diane Finver at                     *Diane.Finver@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-1367.                

Dated: January 27, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01991 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 4.5


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                     CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS CAPITAL TRUST I

      THIS Certificate of Trust of Citizens Communications Capital Trust I (the
"Trust"), dated as of April 27, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustee, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss.3801, et seq.).

      1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Citizens
Communications Capital Trust I.

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., 1201 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the Trust,
has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.
                                    not in its individual capacity but solely
                                    as trustee of the Trust


                                    By: /s/ Denis Kelly
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Denis Kelly
                                            Title: Assistant Vice President
Order filed December 10 , 201 3 , Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order

filed December 10, 2013

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00888

- CR

____________ WILLIAM MARK RHODE S , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1259408



### ORDER

On December 10, 201 3 , this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record has been filed.
Accordingly, o ur order of December 10, 2013, is withdrawn. The appeal is reinstated. Appellant’s brief is du e 30 days from the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
No. 82-5981.

#### Hilson *v.*Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, et al.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2000

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40100

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL AVILA-CORTES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-824-ALL

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Avila-Cortes

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Avila has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
INSTALLATION AND MARKETING AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT #1


This is Amendment #1 to the INSTALLATION AND MARKETING AGREEMENT dated October
16th, 1996 between OFFICEMAX INC. AND U-SHIP INC.

          Section 2 is hereby amended in the first sentence to change the
     "Expiration Date" from December 31, 1997 to January 31, 1998.

          Section 3 is hereby amended in the third sentence to change the number
     of ASCAEs OFFICEMAX INC. shall allow U-SHIP INC. to install from
     approximately 73 to approximately 140 retail locations to be installed by
     approximately January 31, 1998 instead of January 31, 1997.

All other terms and conditions of the original INSTALLATION AND MARKETING
AGREEMENT remain the same.




OFFICEMAX, INC.                            U-SHIP, INC.


By:________________________________        By:_______________________________
     Douglas L. Scroggins                       Bryan Virgin
     Divisional Vice President                  Vice President Marketing & Sales


Date:______________________________        Date:_____________________________
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: August 3, 2006
**EXHIBIT12.2**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS(in thousands except ratios)**
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Nine Months**                        | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Ended September 30, 2006** | ** ** |
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions |       | $                                           | 56,988     |   |
| Interest expense (excludes  amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | 127,740                                     |       |
| Earnings before  debt service                                        |       | $                                           | 184,728    |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                        |       |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) |       | $                                           | 127,740    |   |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    |       | 7,157                                       |       |
| Total debt  service                                                  |       | $                                           | 134,897    |   |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                                  | ** ** |
| **Ratio of earnings to debt service**                                | ** ** | **1.37**                                    | ** ** |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Recommended Screening Limits for Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) (NUREG-1874)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1874 (PDF 2.32 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**  March 2007**Date Published:**  March 2010

**Prepared by:** M.T. EricksonKirk 1 T.L. Dickson2

2Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

1Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

During plant operation, the walls of reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) are exposed to neutron radiation, resulting in localized embrittlement of the vessel steel and weld materials in the core area. If an embrittled RPV had a flaw of critical size and certain severe system transients were to occur, the flaw could propagate very rapidly through the vessel, resulting in a through-wall crack and challenging the integrity of the RPV. The severe transients of concern, known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS) events, are characterized by a rapid cooling of the internal RPV surface in combination with repressurization of the RPV. Advancements in its understanding and knowledge of materials behavior, its ability to model realistically plant systems and operational characteristics, and its ability to better evaluate PTS transients to estimate loads on vessel walls led the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to realize that the analysis conducted in the course of developing the PTS Rule in the 1980s contained significant conservatisms.

This report provides two options for using the updated technical basis described herein to develop PTS screening limits. Calculations reported herein show that the risk of through-wall cracking is low in all operating pressurized-water reactors, and current PTS regulations include considerable implicit margin.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### MONIQUE, INC., Appellant, v. Harold A. BOIRE, Regional Director of the Twelfth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Appellees.

No. 21581.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 1965.

*1018Joseph A. Perkins, Miami Fla., for appellant.

Julius G. Serot, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Robert Cohn, Atlanta, Ga., Herbert L. Kaplan, Miami, Fla., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Alvin Lieberman, Marvin Roth, Attys., N.L.R.B., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS * and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the Tenth Circuit sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Monique filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging unfair labor practices by a labor organization in violation of the National Labor Relations Act. The charge was referred to the Board’s Regional Director. The Director issued a complaint predicated on the charge. Thereafter, the Regional Director filed a petition and an amended petition, seeking an injunction under Section 10 (Z) of the Act, enjoining the labor organization from engaging in the alleged unfair labor practices “pending the final adjudication of the Board with respect to such matter.” However, aside from filing the petitions, the Regional Director did not seek the in-junctive relief. Monique filed a motion to intervene in the injunction proceeding and accompanied by an intervening petition in which it sought an order directing the Regional Director to bring the petition for injunction on for hearing and for an injunction enjoining the labor organization from engaging in such alleged unfair labor practices. In its final order the lower court denied the right to intervene and the other relief sought by Monique. From that order Monique has appealed.

Pending such appeal, the Board proceeded to a hearing on the complaint and made a final adjudication of the matter.

Since the temporary injunctive relief provided by Section 10 (Z) would necessarily terminate upon such final adjudication of the Board, the questions raised on this appeal are now moot. McLeod, for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. Business Machine & Office App. Mech. Conf. Bd., 2 Cir., 300 F.2d 237, 241.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument Collections

# Management Directives

*Management Directives contain the policies and procedures that govern the internal NRC functions necessary for the agency to accomplish its regulatory mission.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes
          - Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials
          - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
          - Agreement State Action Items
          - Agreement State Communications
          - ASLBP
          - Commission Documents
          - Congressional Documents
          - Electronic Government (E-Gov) Documents
          - Enforcement Documents
          - Enforcement Petition (2.206)
          - Events, Reports Associated with
          - Fact Sheets & Brochures
          - Federal Register Notices (NRC)
          - Forms (NRC)
          - For the Record
          - Generic Communications
          - Generic Issues
          - Government Information Locator Service (GILS)
          - Human Factors Information System
          - Inspection Manual
          - OIG Reports
          - IMPEP Reviews of NRC Programs
          - Interim Staff Guidance
          - Management Directives
          - Memoranda of Understanding
          - News Releases
          - NMSS Procedures
          - NRC Datasets
          - NRC Infographics
          - NRC Maps
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - OMB Exhibit 300s
          - Personal Identity Verification
          - Previous Site Additions
          - Regulations (NRC, 10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides (by Division)
          - Research Information Letters
          - Rulemaking Documents
          - Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020