alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 13.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian
Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, In Beom Park, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/In Beom ParkName: In Beom Park
Title: President, CEO, Director 
  Date: August 19, 2011

---
Exhibit
      23.4




December
      31, 2007




El
      Capitan Precious Metals Inc.


Suite
      276


1325
      Airmotive Way


Reno,
      NV
      89502




Gentlemen:




The
      undersigned hereby consents to the reference to the undersigned in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Annual Report”), including without limitation
      references in Item 2, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission.




I
      also
      confirm that I have read each of the references to me in the Annual Report
      and
      concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
      admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by
      Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Sincerely,/s/
              Mike
              ThomasMike
                Thomas
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4570-4571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Radio Broadcasting Services; AM or FM Proposals To Change the 
Community of License

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals to change 
the community of license: Crawford, Charles E, Station NEW, Facility ID 
191560, BMPH-20140929AAX, From Sonora, TX, To Christoval, TX; 
Everglades City Broadcasting Company, Inc., Station WBGY, Facility ID 
47386, BPED-20140825ABL, From Naples, FL, To Everglades City, FL; 
Penfold Communications, Inc., Station KRTM, Facility ID 91840, BPED-
20150113AAE, From Yucca Valley, CA, To Banning, CA; Rudex Broadcasting 
Limited Corporation, Station KSDT, Facility ID 36830, BP-20141124BHJ, 
From Hemet, CA, To Redlands, CA; Solid Rock Foundation, Station KBDW, 
Facility ID 176883, BPED-20141120AGW, From Wheeler, TX, To Lefors, TX; 
Sunrise

[[Page 4571]]

Broadcasting, LLC, Station WILT, Facility ID 74159, BPH-20141119AAN, 
From Wilmington, NC, To Carolina Beach, NC.

DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before March 30, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tung Bui, 202-418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The full text of these applications is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 
20554 or electronically via the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base 
System, http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/cdbs_pa.htm. A 
copy of this application may also be purchased from the Commission's 
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street 
SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or 
www.BCPIWEB.com.

Federal Communications Commission.
James D. Bradshaw,
Deputy Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2015-01596 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ELIGIA JUNIOR MARTIN, a/k/a Shorty Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00049-jlk-mfu-3; 4:10-cv-80233-jlkmfu)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 27, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eligia Junior Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, 

Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eligia Junior Martin seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

11:00 a.m., Thursday, February 5, 2015.

# PLACE:

 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Mill Branch Coal Corp.*                         v.                         *Secretary of Labor,*                         Docket Nos. VA 2012-435-R                         *et al.*                         (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding an imminent danger order.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

 Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-01808 Filed 1-27-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5103-5104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12796-004]


City of Wadsworth, Ohio; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

January 23, 2015.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 380 (Order No. 
486, 52 Federal Register [FR] 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for a major original license for the 50-
megawatt Robert C. Byrd Hydroelectric Project (RC

[[Page 5104]]

Byrd Project or project), located on the Ohio River at the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam (RC Byrd Locks 
and Dam), approximately 12.7 miles south of the confluence of the Ohio 
River and the Kanawha River, 9 miles south of the Town of Gallipolis, 
Gallia County, Ohio, and prepared a Final Environmental Assessment 
(FEA) for the project. The proposed project would occupy 7.6 acres of 
federal land administered by the Corps.
    The FEA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
impacts of the proposed project and concludes that licensing the 
proposed project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, 
would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly 
affect the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the FEA is available for review at the Commission in the 
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at 
www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number 
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2f4f7e0f1fddcdedbdcd7e1c7c2c2ddc0c6f2d4d7c0d19cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9fffcebfaf6d7d5d0d7dceaccc9c9d6cbcdf9dfdccbda97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, 
202-502-8659.
    You may also register online at www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances 
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support.
    For further information, contact Gaylord Hoisington by telephone at 
202-502-6032 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef888e9683809d8bc18780869c8681889b8081af898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2641475f4a495442084e494f554f4841524948664043544508414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01732 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2
                               CERTIFICATION

I, Jack M. Rapport, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zanett, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: April 14, 2004


/s/  Jack M. Rapport
     ---------------
Name:  Jack M. Rapport
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report - Fiscal Year 2014 (NUREG-1542, Volume 20)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document (PDF – 8.43 MB)
        - NUREG–1542, Volume 20:
        Chapter 1 — Management's Discussion and Analysis (PDF – 1.78 MB)
Chapter 2 — Program Performance (PDF – 1.10 MB)
Chapter 3 — Financial Statements and Auditors' Report (PDF – 896.52 KB)
Chapter 4 — Other Information (PDF – 3.14 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: November 2014

Division of Planning and Budget Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Performance and Accountability Report is an account of the agency's effectiveness in achieving its mission during fiscal year (FY) 2014. The report describes the agency's program and financial management performance during FY 2014, which covers the period from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
**Exhibit32.1**

**KINDERMORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906****OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in thecapacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KinderMorgan Management, LLC and will be retained by Kinder Morgan Management, LLCand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
| Dated: March 1, 2007 |   | /s/ Richard D. Kinder                |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Richard D. Kinder                    |
|                 |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
p. 1



# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 172)IV-E-4 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56

PM Sheet 172 of 242P. 2 'I " 

### P'S?

-1% $ -f%\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y^~'^ i^U^ /

AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### V « / '« t PRO* 0 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Result s o f Reques t for Comment s on Draf t Contrac t

Work Assignmen t FROM : Pau l M . Laing , Chemica l Enginee r fv,^n } -ty„,.„.

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h ' • ' TO : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 THRU : Glenn W . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Manage r /LU-^-.-^ te*-!***^

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Cheste r j . France , Chie f Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h ^tkltUH^ Ea4CVV^# L
A s a followu

p t o EPA' s previou s onboard safet yanalysis , EP Aprepare d a Scop e o f Work for a contrac t work assignmen t entitle d "Vehicl e Fue l Syste mComparativ e Ris k Assessment. " Th e purpos e o f thi s work assignmen t i s t o asses s th e safet y aspect s an

d potentia l risk s o f variou s onboard contro l approache s i n compariso n t o design feature s foun d in curren t fue l syste

mconfigurations . O n Marc h 1 , 1988 , EP Asen t thi s draf t Scop e o f Work fo r commen t t o th e following fou

r safet y organizations : Insuranc e Institut e for Highwa ySafet y(IIHS) , Cente r for Aut o Safet y(CAS) , Nationa l Transportatio n Safet y Board (NTSB) , an

d th e Offic e o f Moto r Carrie r Safet y(OMCS ) o f th e Departmen t o f Transportation . A s o f Marc h 31 , 198 8 onl y IIH S ha d responde d t o thi s reques t for comment . T o determin e i f th e othe r thre e organization s als o intende d t o respond , o n Marc h 31s t an

d Apri l 4th , I followe d u p wit h phon e call s t o NTSB , CAS , an

d OMCS . Thi s memo summarize s the response s I received .P. 3

First , I trie d t o contac t Dr . Merrit t Birkeyo f NTSB . However , h

e wa s no t available , an d a follow-u

p phon e cal l o n Apri l 14 , 198 8 wa s als o unsuccessful . Contac t wa s finall ymad e wit h Dr . Birke yon Apri l 19 , 1988 , bu t he wa s no t abl e t o commi t t o providing u s wit h comments . Second , I contacte d Clarenc e Ditlo wo f CAS . M r Ditlo winforme d me tha t CAS ha s devote d mos t o f thei r effor t i n th e pas t si x month s t o completing a stud

yon vehicl e fire s an d thei r causes . Du e t o thi s highe r priorit ywork , CA S ha s no t ye t had tim e t o review th e scop e o f work . H e added tha t h e migh t ge t the chanc e t o reviewth

e documen t in a wee k or two an d woul d possibl yprovid e comment s at tha t time . Finally , I contacte d JimBritel l o f OMCS . Mr . Britell' s genera l commen t wa s tha t th e assessmen t seeme d fin e for light-dut yvehicles , bu t h e expresse d concer n abou t it s extensio n t o heavy-dut yvehicles . H e als o mentione d tha t he woul d followu p wit h a fe

wwritte n comments . T o date , n o comment s hav e bee n receive d fro man yo f thes e thre e organizations .
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Subsequent License Renewal for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 – Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 6, Second Renewal)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 6, Second Renewal, Final Report (PDF - 30.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: April 2020**Date Published**: April 2020

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff prepared this supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) as part of its environmental review of Dominion Energy Virginia's application to renew the operating licenses for Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (Surry) for an additional 20 years. This SEIS includes the NRC staff's evaluation of the environmental impacts of the license renewal and alternatives to license renewal. Alternatives considered include: (1) a new nuclear (Small Modular Reactor) generation alternative, (2) a natural gas combined-cycle power plant, and (3) a combination of natural gas combined-cycle power plant, solar, and demand-side management. The NRC staff’s recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Surry are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. The NRC staff based its recommendation on the following: the analysis and findings in NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants"
        - the environmental report submitted by Dominion Energy Virginia
        - the NRC staff's consultation with Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies
        - the NRC staff's independent environmental review
        - the NRC staff's consideration of public comments

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 16, 2024