alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Respondent, v Jose Bonilla, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 438]

In a proceeding to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated March 24, 1993, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, with costs, and the proceeding is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Two arguments were raised in the Supreme Court in connection with the petition to permanently stay arbitration. The first, raised by the petitioner, was that an earlier arbitration proceeding between the parties barred the instant proceeding. The second, raised by Jose Bonilla in his answer to the petition, is that the petition must be dismissed because the petitioner did not comply with CPLR 306-b (a).

Turning to the petitioner’s argument, we find that no rational arbitrator could issue an award in the appellant’s favor now, in light of the prior unimpeached arbitration award in Aetna’s favor. We also find that Aetna agreed to submit to no more than one single arbitration relative to the one single injury claimed to have been caused by the one single uninsured motor vehicle involved in this case. Any successive *709arbitration proceeding between the same parties, and concerning the identical circumstances as those reviewed in the prior arbitration would violate the parties’ contract as well as principles of res judicata. Under these circumstances, the granting of a stay was proper (see, *Matter of Klein Assocs. v Goldenberg,*183 AD2d 717; *Matter of Cine-Source, Inc. v Burrows,*180 AD2d 592, 593; *Protocom Devices v Figueroa,*173 AD2d 177; *Matter of Intercontinental Packaging Co. v China Natl. Cereals,*159 AD2d 190; *Matter of Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Green,*146 AD2d 699; *Matter of David Assocs. [Bevona],*109 AD2d 623; *City of Rochester v AFSCME, Local 1635,*54 AD2d 257; *cf., Matter of City School Dist. v Tonawanda Educ. Assn.,*63 NY2d 846; *Board of Educ. v Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers,*48 NY2d 812, 813; *Matter of Board of Educ. [Florida Teachers Assn.],*104 AD2d 411, *affd*64 NY2d 822; *Vilceus v North Riv. Ins. Co.,*150 AD2d 769). This is true even though the judgment confirming the prior award had been vacated for procedural reasons *(see, e.g., Katz v Kar,*192 AD2d 695; *Protocom Devices v Figueroa, supra; County of Rockland v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*129 AD2d 606; *Hilowitz v Hilowitz,*85 AD2d 621; *cf., Matter of Allcity Ins. Co. [Vitucci],*151 AD2d 430, *affd*74 NY2d 879; *Gibe v Hajek,*166 AD2d 502).

However, the judgment appealed from, in determining that the earlier arbitration award was entitled to preclusive effect, failed to address the parties’ factual dispute with respect to dismissal of the petition for the petitioner’s failure to comply with CPLR 306-b (a). Therefore, the judgment must be reversed and the matter remitted for further proceedings to determine whether the proceeding to stay arbitration was properly commenced. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5122-5123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant

[[Page 5123]]

applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project 
Applications (P01).
    Date: February 26, 2015.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 4F100, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: March 2, 2015.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 4F100, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Nancy Vazquez-Maldonado, Ph.D. Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS700B, 5601 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5044 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed839b8c979c988897ad83848c8489c3838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="48263e2932393d2d3208262129212c66262120662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 26, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01715 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                       

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001002813
 
<NAME>                        Dignity Partners, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         18,892,526
<SECURITIES>                                    3,954,029
<RECEIVABLES>                                     577,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                              
<INVENTORY>                                    39,173,887 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  773,366
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 63,371,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,484,977
<BONDS>                                        38,900,690 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           42,918
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,942,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   63,371,510
<SALES>                                           285,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,963,585
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,696,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,824,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (557,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (557,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,884,651
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,327,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.34  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0

<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND PURCHASED LIFE INSURANCE POLICY.
<F2>REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY. 

</FN>
 
        

</TABLE>
## ACME SRICK

~~ ee 1
~ 91

August 12, 2008
Submitted via FedEx Mr. Jeffrey Telander U.S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Re: Information Collection Request Acme Brick Company Dear Mr. Telander, Please find enclosed the completed forms for all brick manufacturing facilities owned and operated by Acme Brick Company. As you will see in the attached forms, footnotes have been added where additional explanation is necessary. In addition, comments on specific forms are provided below: 

### Form A • The size classification for each facility is based on the current permit for that location. The classifications may change in the future based upon re-evaluations of the operations. 

### Form B • Kilns that have been demolished are specifically noted to assist the EPA in updating the database. • Periodic kiln permitted capacity (column L) is represented in tons per year/kiln as opposed to tons per hour/kiln. Tunnel kiln permitted capacity is based on a rolling 12-month average and not an instantaneous limit. • Permitted throughFut limits that are less than the full design capacity are due to the previous MACT rule and should not be considered when evaluating the full capacity of the kiln. • Controls installed on ACME-5 were not in response to MACT but were installed for other permitting reasons. Throughput limits (<10.0 tph) were taken on the kilns to ensure that the kilns were not subj ect to the now vacated MACT JJJJJ. All other controls installed, with the exception of Acme 17, were installed for non-MACT compliance requirements. • Column M, "Actual Capacity Utilization" identifies the significantly reduced production output for the majority of Acme's facilities during 2007. For 2008,

ACME BRICK COMPANY P.O. Box 425 — Fort Worth, Texas 76101 — TEL: 817/332-4101total production will be even lower. In fact, more kilns/plants have been idled this year and more are likely to come. Acme would like the EPA to recognize that any additional control, be it in the form of new air pollution control devices or modifications to existing controls, would be devastating to the viability and continued operation of many brick facilities. Permanent plant closings will result in the event that the new MACT requires additional controls. Form F • The data requested in Form F is confidential and was submitted separately as confidential business information (CBI) as indicated in the instructions. Acme appreciates the opportunity to provide comment and assist with the information gathering process and hopes that these efforts will result in a MACT rule that is fair, equitable, and considers the significant economic hardship the industry is currently undergoing and by all forcasts will continue to suffer for years to come. If you have any questions regarding this submittal please call me at 817-870-8354 or call Jason Pence at 817-870-8348.

Company

Enclosures: Forms A-G (excluding Form F) Stack Test Data Reports as Included on Form D

cc: Dennis Knautz, Ed Watson, Jason Pence

ACME BRICK COMPANY P.O. Box 425 — Fort Worth, Texas 76101 — TEL: 817/332-4101
No. D-962.

#### In re Disbarment of Rubin.

It is ordered that Leonard Rubin, of Watchung, N. J., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 6/30/97 and Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the quarter ended 6/30/97 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,465
<SECURITIES>                                    15,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                       604
<INVENTORY>                                         91
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,141
<PP&E>                                          20,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,367
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,470)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,415
<SALES>                                          2,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,079
<CGS>                                              578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.15)
        


</TABLE>
Date ~, ~~ g: \ ':L 0 I tfMeeting: S ~ lJV (>""-+ ~ M-e~ \2-e 1,.S 

Rule(s) Discussed: 

Written Materials? Yes/No 

Name Organization Phone N urn her 

S(o 'fT ~A'l-!Vt ~N 1 f/.leLu CJ;L 2o 2- -<-I t;,C, -I LJ<f r 

M·A R.,N 12_ 11 )J\L I( ~~e 2 0 1 'YJoiJL_/!121 

?A-vL (;1//IJArwJr Fr,r;. .. 1 d-o) - sCf~-!~J-b 

~f4rJ / /~Aufj/1 f) \2Io 1/ 'f? I ~-;)Cjj- V£Ycj ""' 'I v 

=- 7 

I
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                          1,788,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,276,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      165,000
<INVENTORY>                                    15,251,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,941,000
<PP&E>                                          4,949,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,296,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,092,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,197,000
<BONDS>                                        17,122,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          369,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,404,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,092,000
<SALES>                                        11,390,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,390,000
<CGS>                                           7,565,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,768,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                995,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (938,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        7,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (945,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      945,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Memorandum to the Docket

From: Ross Elliott, U.S. EPA, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

Subject: Personal Communication with Doug McCurrey, Vice President Marketing and 

Business Development, Kinder Morgan

Date: 14 June 2011

On 21 July, 2010, Kathryn Caballero of U.S. EPA’s Office of Civil Enforcement spoke with Mr. 

Doug McCurrey, Vice-President for Marketing and Business Development, Kinder Morgan CO2

Development Company. Ms. Caballero asked Mr. McCurrey how Kinder Morgan tests their 

CO2 pipelines to ensure that no undesirable contaminants are added or transported. Mr. 

McCurrey responded that they take a supercritical sample from the pipeline, gasify it, and run it 

through the gas chromatograph to identify organic impurities. He also stated that Kinder 

Morgan's greatest concerns are for CO2 water content, which they monitor closely. They are also 

concerned about inert materials in the CO2 supply stream, not only because they reduce the 

effectiveness of CO2 transport, but because they tend to take up needed space.
EXHIBIT 15.2   [ex152002.gif]  LETTER TO THE COMMISSION AND CONSENT OF FORMER PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance 100 F. Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549-7010  RE: KISKA METALS CORPORATION CHANGE IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT  We have reviewed a copy of the disclosures that Kiska Metals Corporation (the Registrant) is making in response to Item 16F Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant contained in the Registrants Transition Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.  We agree with the statements made by the Registrant in response to Item 16F of the Registrants Transition Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.  We further consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Registrants Transition Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.    MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP   /s/McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP  Chartered Accountants Licensed Public Accountants  Former Principal Accountant of Kiska Metals Corporation  Toronto, Canada April 23, 2010    2005 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 300, Toronto Ontario, Canada M2J 5B4 Telephone: (416) 496-1234   Fax: (416) 496-0125 Email: info@mhc-ca.com
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Testing to Evaluate Extended Battery Operation in Nuclear Power Plants  (NUREG/CR-7188)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7188 (PDF - 2.58 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2014**Date Published:** May 2015

**Prepared by:** W. Gunther, G. Greene, Y. Celebi, K. Sullivan and J. Higgins

Brookhaven National Laboratory Nuclear Science and Technology Department Systems Engineering Group Upton, NY 11973-5000

Liliana Ramadan, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Japanese earthquake and tsunami event on March 11, 2011, illustrated the fact that restoration of the alternating current (AC) power supply at nuclear power plants (NPPs) can be significantly impacted by external events and can take a longer time to recover under certain scenarios. Therefore, a lesson learned from the Japanese event that may be applicable to U.S. NPPs is the need to examine the extended loss of alternating current power (ELAP) conditions and determine if the existing vented lead acid batteries can function beyond their defined design basis (or beyond-design basis if existing Station Blackout (SBO) coping analyses were utilized) duty cycles in order to support core cooling. The NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research sponsored testing to evaluate the battery’s performance availability and capability to supply the necessary direct current (DC) loads to support core cooling and instrumentation requirements for extended periods of time. Plant profiles from four NPPs [3 Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) and 1 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)] were obtained from the nuclear industry through the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and were used for this test program. The testing provided an indication of the amount of time available (depending on the actual load profile) for batteries to continue to supply core cooling equipment beyond the original duty cycles for a representative plant. Testing also demonstrated that battery availability can be significantly extended using load shedding techniques to allow more time to recover AC power. The projected availability of a battery can be accurately calculated using the IEEE Standard 485-2010, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Sizing Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications,” or using the empirical algorithm described in this report. This report provides detailed test results and analysis regarding the battery’s performance availability and capability for the tested load profiles.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
|Exhibit 99.1


In connection with the
Quarterly Report of IMPATH Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anu D.
Saad, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By /s/ ANU D. SAAD

Anu D. Saad, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------