alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management

# Fuel Behavior under Abnormal Conditions (NUREG/KM-0004)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/KM-0004 (PDF - 4.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**January 2013

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

Under normal operating conditions, cladding and core structural materials operate around 300 degrees Celsius (C), and fuel pellets experience peak temperatures below 2,000 degrees C at the pellet centerline. At these temperatures, fuel cladding integrity is maintained, and fission products are contained within the fuel rods. However, under some abnormal conditions, higher temperatures and other conditions significantly alter the behavior of these materials. These conditions can threaten core coolability and lead to fission product release. This NUREG report considers the following two types of accident conditions: (1) reactivity-initiated accidents and (2) loss-of-coolant accidents. This report describes the fuel behavior of each accident condition from basic concepts to the current state of the art. It also mentions safety criteria, references the classic experimental work in each of these areas, and presents equations and figures that permit some quantitative evaluations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Request for 60 Day Extension to Comment Period

To Whom it May Concern;

The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) is a trade association of the interstate natural gas 

pipeline industry. INGAA member companies transport the vast majority of the natural gas consumed in the 

United States through over 185,000 miles of interstate natural gas pipelines.

On April 15, 2014, EPA released for external review five technical white papers on potentially significant sources 

of methane and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in the oil and gas sector (EPA White Papers). The 

deadline for submitting a response currently is June 16, 2014. INGAA respectfully requests a 60 day extension of 

time—to and including August 15, 2014—within which to submit our comments and answers to the questions

posed in the EPA White Papers.

A more detailed written request is attached.

INGAA appreciates your prompt attention to this request and looks forward to your response. Please contact me 

at 202­216­5935 or lbeal@ingaa.org if you have any questions. Thank you.

Lisa S. Beal

VP, Environment & Construction Policy

INGAA

20 F Street NW

Suite 450

Washington, DC 20001

(O) 202­216­5935

(M) 202­256­9134

Lisa Beal <lbeal@ingaa.org>

Thu 5/15/2014 4:16 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

Cc:Moore, Bruce <Moore.Bruce@epa.gov>; 

Importance: High

 1 attachment

White Paper Request For an Extension.pdf; 

Request for 60 Day Extension to Comment Period - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 2

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
Request for 60 Day Extension to Comment Period - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 2 of 2

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
# L_2015009EN.01006101.xml

| 15.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 9/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 9/61

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/36 of 12 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 13 January 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 13 January 2015

On page 3, in the Annex:

for:

‘0808 91 00’,

read:

‘0709 91 00’.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Basis for the Treatment of Potential Common-Cause Failure in the Significance Determination Process (NUREG-2225)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2225 (PDF – 622.35 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2018**Date Published:** September 2018

**Prepared by:**

A.Mosleh1K.CoyneC.HunterS.Shen1

1University of California, Los AngelesSamueli School of Engineering7400 Boelter HallLos Angeles, CA 90095

Christopher Hunter, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Event and condition assessment is an application of probabilistic risk assessment in which observed equipment failures, degradations, and outages are mapped into a risk model to obtain a numerical estimate of risk significance. These retrospective assessments are used in regulatory applications, such as the Significance Determination Process (SDP), Accident Sequence Precursor Program, and Incident Investigation Program. In the SDP, which is the focus for this report, the identified performance deficiency is mapped in the risk model by adjusting the failure probability of the affected (i.e., nonconforming) component. In addition, the probability of common-cause failure (CCF) is adjusted to reflect the performance deficiency that could have affected all redundant components in the affected system (i.e., within the same common-cause component group in the risk model). Experience has shown that increased potential for CCF is often a substantial contributor to the risk significance of a performance deficiency.

This NUREG documents the basis for the treatment of CCF potential at the level of the observed performance deficiency within the scope of the SDP, describes important technical terms associated with CCF modeling and how these terms relate to event and conditional assessments versus base probabilistic risk assessment modeling, and provides examples of CCF potential for actual conditions. It also describes the basic assumptions and key principles for treating CCF of redundant components in SDP risk assessments when one or more of the redundant components are failed or functionally degraded due to a deficiency in licensee performance. This report does not introduce new methods for CCF and is intended to summarize the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's philosophical basis for treating CCF within retrospective risk assessments performed as part of the SDP.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0129

Lower Tribunal No. CF17-009340-XX

_____________________________

FRANKY M. VALLEJO,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

July 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOZNIAK, WHITE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Robin H. Stevenson, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Limited Burnup Credit in Criticality Safety Analysis: A Comparison of ISG-8 and Current International Practice (NUREG/CR-6702)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6702 (PDF - 1.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2000**Date Published:** January 2001

**Prepared by:** I. C. Gauld

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6370

D. D. Ebert, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6479

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report has been prepared to qualitatively assess the amount of burnup credit (reactivity margin) provided by ISG-8 compared to that provided by the burnup credit methodology developed and currently applied in France. For the purposes of this study, the methods proposed in the DOE Topical Report have been applied to the ISG-8 framework since this methodology (or one similar to it) is likely to form the basis of initial cask licensing applications employing limited burnup credit in the United States. This study limits the scope of the comparison to several of the fundamental burnup credit parameters: the nuclides credited in the analysis, the axial-burnup profile, and the cooling time. An investigation of other parameters, such as horizontal burnup effects and isotopic correction factors to account for biases and uncertainties in calculated actinide compositions, were beyond the scope of this review. This report compares the amount of burnup credit provided by the respective methodologies for typical axial-burnup profiles derived from averaging actual PWR axial-burnup distributions. In addition, a limited assessment of several atypical axial-burnup distributions is also included.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
fs1a7ex10xxv_southchina.htm


 


Exhibit 10.25


 


 



Hogs Purchase Contract







Party A: ShengzhenDexing Food Development Co. Ltd.







Party B: Jiangxi YingtanHuaxin Livestock Ltd.







Party A and Party B hereby agrees:


 



	
1.  

	
Party B will be party A’s supply base in Jiangxi, and Party A will purchase Party B’s live hogs to meet Shengzhen market’s needs.  Both parties will develop mutual beneficial relationship.








	
2.  

	
Party B will supply Party A with 500,000 heads of live hogs yearly, subject to Party B having such number of hogs available for sale to Party A.  The supply schedule and quantity will be decided every month, and price will be decided on daily basis according to the market conditions.








	
3.  

	
Hogs supplied should weigh approximately from 100 kg to 110 kg, meet the health requirements, and pass the inspection on drug test.








	
4.  

	
The selling price will be protected by price floor of 6.3 rmb per 500 gram and price ceiling of 8.3 rmb per 500 gram. If the market price is between 6.3 rmb and 8.3 rmb, the market price is used.








	
5.  

	
Delivery location: at Party B’s farms.  All hogs should be inspected, weighed and loaded on truck.








	
6.  

	
Payment: cash or bank card paid at party B’s location when hogs are delivered.








	
7.  

	
Contract term: from Sep 1, 2010 to Aug 31, 2011.








	
8.  

	
This contract has two original copies and each party possesses one copy.












Signatures:







Party A


ShengzhenDexing Food Development Co. Ltd.


Signature: YingminLuo


(company seal)












Party B: Jiangxi YingtanHuaxin Livestock Ltd.


Signature: Luping Pan


(company seal)







Date: Sep 1, 2010
Attn:

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building 

Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 

Carter York dba. YorKool Media

REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) 

CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 

AND DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Carter York 

Owner/Operator 

YorKool Media 

3101 Emory Dr. 

Flower Mound, TX 75022 

214-724-9035 

carter@yorkoolmedia.com
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Regulatory Effectiveness Assessment of Generic Issue 43 and Generic Letter 88-14 (NUREG-1837)

 On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1837 (PDF - 492 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2005**Date Published:**October 2005

**Prepared by:** J.V. Kauffman, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents an assessment of Generic Issue 43, "Contamination of Instrument Air Lines," and Generic Letter 88-14, "Instrument Air Supply System Problems Affecting Safety-Related Equipment." This assessment is part of an ongoing initiative through which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, is reviewing selected agency regulations and decisions to determine whether they are achieving the desired results. For this assessment, the staff compared expectations with outcomes. Whenever outcomes fell short of expectations, the staff attempted to identify ways to enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and realism of the NRC's regulatory process.

On the basis of its assessment, the staff concluded that licensee and agency activities, such as the Maintenance Rule, Generic Letter 88-14, design-basis reconstitution, and others, have significantly improved air system and component performance and, thereby, resulted in improved reactor safety. Moreover, issuance of Generic Letter 88-14 and targeted NRC inspections led to the identification and resolution of air system design issues impacting safety-related systems and components, again resulting in improved reactor safety. As a result, based on data for pressurized-water reactors, major losses of instrument air are now infrequent, and prompt recovery from such losses is typical, which supports the staff's conclusion that reactor safety has improved. In addition, as evidenced by the ongoing discovery and correction of air system issues, licensee programs and NRC oversight activities provide assurance that the NRC and its licensees are effectively maintaining reactor safety in this area.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Signature Leisure, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen W. Carnes, President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\ Stephen W. CarnesStephen W. CarnesPresidentPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 12, 2007

---
#### Legault, Appellant, vs. Malacker, Respondent.

*February 27*

March *17, 1914.*

*Dogs: Injury to person: Viciousness:*Scienter: *Pleading.*

1. Sec. 1620, Stats., makes allegation and proof of *scienter*unnecessary as well in case of injuries to persons as in case of injuries to cattle by dogs.

2. A complaint which alleges that a dog attacked and wounded a person who at the time was where he might lawfully be and in the exercise of ordinary care, is sufficient without alleging that the dog was vicious and mischievous. The law no longer “allows a dog his first bite.”

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Marinette county: W. B. QuiNLAN, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The action is brought by a father to recover damages resulting to him by reason of the illness and death of his minor son. The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant owned a certain dog and that on a certain day while the plaintiff’s son, in the exercise of due care, was lawfully in and upon the highway, said dog attacked and bit *508him, so wounding him that he subsequently died as a result of his said injuries. Resulting damages are also fully alleged. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Gilbertson, Lehr, Reitman & Kiefer,*attorneys, and *Lehr, Kiefer & Reitman*and *J. Elmer Lehr,*of counsel, and oral argument by *J. Elmer Lehr.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Eastman, Goldman & Fairchild,*and oral argument by *II. R. Goldman.*

Winslow, O. J.

The respondent claims that the complaint should allege (1) that the dog was vicious or mischievous, and (2) that the defendant had knowledge of that fact.

Upon these contentions the court holds:

1. Sec. 1620, Stats. 1911, makes allegation and proof of *scienter*unnecessary as well in case of injuries to persons as in case of injuries to cattle by dogs. The doubts expressed in *Kertschacke v. Ludwig,*28 Wis. 430, and *Slinger v. Henneman,*38 Wis. 504, are not considered well founded.

2. Where a complaint alleges that a dog attacked and wounded a person who at the time was where he might lawfully be and in the exercise of ordinary care, it is unnecessary to go further and allege that the dog was vicious or mischievous. Such a dog is necessarily vicious and a separate allegation to that effect is unnecessary. The law no longer “allows a dog his first bite,” as was said to be the case before the passage of the law abolishing proof of *scienter.*

*By the Court.*— Order reversed, and action remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1892 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1892

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2017

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Hometown Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF IN THE EVENT OF 
              THE DEATH OF A FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 
              DUTY.

    (a) Amendment.--The sixth sentence of section 7(m) of title 4, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``possession of the United 
        States'' and inserting a comma;
            (2) by inserting ``or the death of a first responder 
        working in any State, territory, or possession who dies while 
        serving in the line of duty,'' after ``while serving on active 
        duty,'';
            (3) by striking ``and'' after ``former officials of the 
        District of Columbia'' and inserting a comma; and
            (4) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        first responders working in the District of Columbia''.
    (b) First Responder Defined.--Such subsection is further amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``, United States Code; 
        and'' and inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) the term `first responder' means a `public safety 
        officer' as defined in section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime 
        Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00256

- CR

Jeffrey LEE

,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial Dist rict Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6806

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’s brief was originally due on November 2 4 , 2014 . Appellant ’ s appointed

counsel, Mr. Edward F. Shaughnessy, III, has been granted two extensions of time in which to

file appellant’s brief, the latest until January 28, 2015

. On January 29, 2015 , Mr. Shaughnessy

requested a third extension of time until February 27, 2015

. The motion is GRANTED, and it is

ORDERED that Mr. Shaughnessy file appellant ’ s brief no later than February 27, 2015. NO

FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 86-892.

#### San Marcos County Water District *v.*San Marcos Unified School District.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.