alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 234PA14

11 June 2015

TEMPLETON PROPERTIES LP, 

Petitioner

v.

TOWN OF BOONE, 

Respondent

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision 

of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 759 S.E.2d 311 (2014), reversing an order 

entered on 7 August 2013 by Judge Shannon R. Joseph in Superior Court, Watauga

County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 April 2015.

Brough Law Firm, by Michael B. Brough; and di Santi Watson Capua Wilson 

& Garrett, PLLC, by Anthony S. di Santi and Chelsea B. Garrett, for petitionerappellant.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, by Benjamin R. Sullivan, for respondentappellee.

PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting 

to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. 

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands 

without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 

305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
TEMPLETON PROPS. LP V. TOWN OF BOONE

Opinion of the Court

-2-

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Steve Antol, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


                                          /s/ Steve Antol
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Steve Antol
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          January 20, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and will be
retained by El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. and subsidiaries and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 105
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

                          [Report No. 115-158]

   To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize pumped 
storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation 
                              reservoirs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

  Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

                              June 2, 2017

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
 [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 
                                6, 2017]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize pumped 
storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation 
                              reservoirs.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau of Reclamation Pumped Storage 
Hydropower Development Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR PUMPED STORAGE HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING 
              MULTIPLE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION RESERVOIRS.

    Section 9(c)(1) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 
485h(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``and pumped storage hydropower 
development exclusively utilizing Bureau of Reclamation reservoirs'' 
after ``including small conduit hydropower development''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 105

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1967

                          [Report No. 115-158]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize pumped 
storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation 
                              reservoirs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 2, 2017

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Goldman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Star Gas Partners, L.P. and will be retained by
Star Gas Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |                         |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | By:                     |  | KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)  
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 1, 2014 |  |  |  | By:                     |  | /s/ Steven J. Goldman                
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | Steven J. Goldman                    
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Review of Responses to NRC Bulletin 2003-02, "Leakage from Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity" (NUREG-1863)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1863 (PDF - 5.95 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 2006**Date Published:**September 2006

**Prepared by:** E. Sullivan and G. Cheruvenki

Division of Component Integrity Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Cracking in pressurized water reactor (PWR) bottom mounted instrumentation (BMI) fabricated from Alloy 600 base material was first identified at the South Texas Project, (STP) Unit 1 plant in the United States (US). Based on the failure analysis of the BMI, the licensee concluded that the cracking was due to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). PWSCC has been identified as the primary degradation mechanism affecting PWR high nickel alloy nozzles and welds (e.g., Alloy 600 tubing, piping, or forging material, and Alloy 82/182 weld material) in the reactor coolant system. To address these concerns, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued NRC Bulletin 2003-02, "Leakage from Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity," on August 21, 2003, to all holders of operating licenses for PWRs. The purpose of the bulletin was to request information from the industry related to the structural integrity of the reactor pressure vessel BMI nozzles at PWR facilities. This report summarizes the NRC staff's review of licensee responses to the Bulletin, licensee's BMI inspection results, industry activities related to BMI inspections, and the staff's conclusions regarding the need for additional regulatory action in this area. A brief summary regarding the inspection results of the BMI penetrations and the associated aging monitoring programs for the foreign reactors is included in this report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,023
<SECURITIES>                                     2,538
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (629)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,591
<PP&E>                                           2,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,076
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,460
<SALES>                                          6,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,246
<CGS>                                            3,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (107)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffClarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements (NUREG-0737)

# Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements: Requirements for Emergency Response Capability (NUREG-0737, Supplement 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0737, Supplement 1 (PDF - 1.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 1982**Date Published:**January 1983

Division of LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document, Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, is a letter from D. G. Eisenhut, Director of the Division of Licensing, NRR, to licensees of operating power reactors, applicants for operating licenses, and holders of construction permits forwarding post-TMI requirements for emergency response capability which have been approved for implementation. On October 30, 1980, the NRC staff issued NUREG-0737, which incorporated into one document all TMI related items approved for implementation by the Commission at that time. In this NRC report, additional clarification is provided regarding Safety Parameter Display Systems, Detailed Control Room Design Reviews, Regulatory Guide 1.97 (Revision 2) - Application to Emergency Response Facilities, Upgrade of Emergency Operating Procedures, Emergency Response Facilities, and Meteorological Data.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HOURS DOWNTIME

Nitric Acid Plant Tail Gas Stack

DATE CAUSE 1/7/2009 8:43 Shut-down the plant to fix a steam leak 1/9/2009 12:20 3/10/2009 3:32 Routine Gauze Change 3/10/2009 15:37 5/18/2009 10:16 Nitric Acid Plant Outage Due to Power Dip 5/18/2009 17:57 6/11/2009 5:59 Routine Gauze Change 6/11/2009 16:49 9/12/2009 14:47 Bi-Annual Maintenance Turnaround 10/2/2009 14:28
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the filing of the QuarterlyReport of Headwaters Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and Scott K. Sorensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (i)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (ii) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
| /s/ Kirk A. Benson      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Kirk A. Benson          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 7, 2007          |
|                    |
| /s/ Scott K. Sorensen   |   |
| Scott K. Sorensen       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 7, 2007          |
|                         |        |  |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Regulatory Effectiveness of the Anticipated Transient Without Scram Rule (NUREG-1780)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1780 (PDF - 5.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2001**Date Published:**September 2003

**Prepared by:** W.S. Raughley, G.F. Lanik

 Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research is reviewing selected regulations to determine if the requirements are achieving the desired outcomes. This initiative is part of an evolving program to make NRC activities and decisions more effective, efficient, and realistic. The goal of this evaluation is to determine whether the anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) rule and the recommendations issued with it were effective. The effectiveness of the ATWS rule was determined by comparing regulatory expectations to outcomes. The report concluded that the ATWS rule was effective in reducing ATWS risk and that the cost of implementing the rule was reasonable. However, uncertainties in reactor protection system reliability and mitigative capability may warrant further attention to ensure the expected levels of safety are maintained.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL DAVID SWEDLOW, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. AMERICAN FINANCE, LLC, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. §

§ No. 438, 2020 § § § Court Below–Justice of the Peace § Court No. 16 of the State of § Delaware in and for Kent County § § § C.A. No. JP16-15-007991 § §

Submitted: January 12, 2021 Decided: January 14, 2021

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES , Justices.

ORDER After careful consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that: (1) On December 22, 2020, the appellant, Michael David Swedlow, filed a notice of appeal from a Justice of the Peace Court order dismissing Swedlow’s motion to vacate a default judgment. On December 29, 2020, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to Swedlow to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the Justice of the

Peace Court.2

(2) On January 12, 2021, Swedlow filed a response to the notice to show cause. Swedlow objects to the dismissal of the appeal and contends that this Court does have jurisdiction to consider his appeal. (3) Notwithstanding Swedlow’s contention to the contrary, it is manifest that this Court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal. A decision by a magistrate of the Justice of the Peace Court, whether in a criminal or civil case, is not directly appealable to this Court. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice

1 Kostyshyn v. City of Wilmington , 2006 WL 2771733, at *1 (Del. Sept. 25, 2006) (citing Del. Const., art. IV, § 11).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Development and Validation of Models for Predicting Leakage from Degraded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints During Severe Accidents (NUREG/CR-7210)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7210 (PDF – 9.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2010**Date Published:**July 2020

**Prepared by:**S. MajumdarK. KaszaC. BahnW.J. Shack

Argonne National LaboratoryArgonne, IL 60439

Patrick Purtscher, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the development and validation of analytical models to predict steam generator (SG) tube leakage that can be expected from cracks within the tube-to-tubesheet junction at high temperature. It is recognized that the problem of predicting the leakage from cracked tubes within the tube sheet (TS) during severe accidents is too complex to be solved by either purely analytical or purely experimental means. In this study Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) adopted a combined analytical-experimental approach. The experiments were designed to simulate several key aspects of the tubesheet behavior during a postulated station blackout severe accident. The resultant predicted leak rates were determined through these efforts.

Pressure and leak rate tests were conducted at high temperatures on 12 tube-to-collar junction specimens with independent pressurization of the tube and the leakage path (crevice). A finite element model of the specimen was used to calculate the variation of contact pressure and tube-to-tubesheet gap over time. A leak rate model was developed based on plane Couette-Poiseuille flow along the interface between two rough contacting surfaces. The model parameters were determined from the leak rate tests.

A finite element model was developed for a Westinghouse Model 51 SG tube-to-tubesheet interface, including the divider plate, lower head and a short segment of the SG shell. The model was used to analyze first, the spatial variation of the temperature with time, and second, the variations of contact pressure and gap along the tube-to-tubesheet interface as functions of time during the postulated station blackout severe accident. The leak rate model was used to predict the leak rates during the severe accident.

Results in this report indicate that leakage could occur through the tube-to-tubesheet joints in station blackout accident conditions, and there are significant variations in the leak rates calculated for different paths. In addition, results show that the leak rate remains low for three hours, after which the rate is predicted to increase. In the absence of tests with realistic interface and boundary conditions, the present results should be considered as best estimates.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 20, 2023
APPENDIX B 

### FISCAL NOTE FOR PROPOSED RULES

Rule Title: 

### 45CSR14 -"Permits for Construction and Maior Modification of Major

Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Significant Deteriorafion" Type of Rule: 

### X Legislative Interpretive Procedural Agency: 

### Division of Air Oualit y Address: 

### 601 57' Street SE

Charleston, WV 25304

Phone Number: 

### (304) 926-047 Email: t,ryn 

### mv.1.mowrei ;nI

T Un°

~ eo;


### Fiscal Note Summary Summarize in a clear and concise manner what impact this measure will have on costs and revenues of state government.

No impact above that resulting from currently applicabte federal emission standards.



### Fiscal Note Detail Show over-all effect in Item 1 and 2 and, in Item 3, give an explanation of Breakdown by fiscal year, including long-range effect.

FISCAL YEAR

Effect of Proposal

2012

Increase/Decrease use "- 2013

Increase/Decrease use "- Fiscal Year

(Upon Full Irnplementation)
1. Estimated Total Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

Personal Services 0 0 0 Current Expenses 0 0 0 Repairs & Alterations 0 0 0

Assets 0 0 0 Equipment 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 2. Estimated Total Revenues 0 0 0

### Rule Title: 45CSR14 -"Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationarv Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Si i i gt ficant Deterioration"



### 3. Explanation of above estimates (including long-range effect): Please include any increase or decrease in fees in your estimated total revenues.

Costs an6cipated to be incurred by revision to this rule are included in prior cost estimates prepared for state implementation of Title V of the Clean Air Act, as amended, under 45CSR30. Full Title V program approval was issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on November 19, 2001.



### MEMORANDUM Please identify any areas of vagueness, technical defects, reasons the proposed rule would not have a fiscal impact, and/or any special issues not captured elsewhere on this form.

Date: June 1, 2011



### John A. Benedict, Director