alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08 -050 8-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL C MA Y8, 2009

_________

_________

_________

___ ALFREDO OCON, AP PEL LANT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 13 7 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF L UB BO CKCOU NT Y; NO . 200 8- 419,882 ; H ON ORABLE CE CI L G. PU RY EAR , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ.
ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON
F o l l o w i n g a p l e a o f g u i l t y , A p p e l l a n t , A l fre d o O c o n , w a s c o n v i c t e d o f b u rg l a r y o f a hab itation w ith inte nt to com m it a ssault, enh ance d. App ellantelecte d to ha v e the jury assess p unish me nt an d w as sen ten ced to ten years conf inem ent . Th e ap pellat e record has been fil ed, b ut no br iefs hav e been filed

.2

P e n ding before this Cou rt is Alf redo Ocon’s Mo t io n to V o l u n ta r i l y D i s m i s s Appea l i n w hi c h he rep r es en ts h e w i s he s t o w i th draw h i s n ot i c e of a pp ea l

. A s req ui r ed b y R ule 42.2( a) of the Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Proc edure, the motion is sig ned by Appel lan t and his att or ney . No deci si on of this Co urt hav ing been del iv ered, the moti on i s g ra nted and the app eal is dismisse d. No mo tion for rehea ring w ill be ente rtaine d an d ou r man dat e w ill is sue forthw it h.
Acc ordin g ly , t he appe al is di smi ss ed.
Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice
Do not p ubl is h.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report — Fiscal Year 2007 (NUREG-1542, Volume 13)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 13 (PDF - 5.74 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: November 2007

Resource Management and Support Staff Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The FY 2007 Performance and Accountability Report provides performance results and audited financial statements that enable Congress, the President, and the public to assess the performance of the agency in achieving its mission and stewardship of its resources. The report contains a concise overview, management's discussion and analysis, as well as performance and financial sections. Additional details of performance results and program evaluations can be found in the appendices.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                         MATZEL & MUMFORD AT MORTGAGE FUNDING, LLC
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                197,402
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       3,853,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    4,050,982
<PP&E>                                                175,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4,226,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,671
<BONDS>                                             3,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  10,000
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                            459,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        4,226,400
<SALES>                                               148,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      148,048
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       17,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    138,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (8,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (8,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (8,356)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0
                                                    
        


</TABLE>
Letter Agreement to Amend MSCI-BGI Fund Index License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT GRANTED. *********** INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN GRANTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

 MSCI 
  

							
	ADL_00074	 		 		 	
		 		 		 	 1221 Avenue of the Americas
 New York, New York 10020
 (212) 762-5800

				
		 		 		 	June 21, 2001

 Barclays Global
Investors, N.A. 
 45 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, California 94105  

Attn: Fund Administration 
  

	 	Re:	Letter Agreement To Amend MSCI-BGI Fund Index License Agreement 

 Dear Sir: 
 This letter agreement (“Letter Agreement”) will amend the
Index License Agreement For Funds, between Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc. (“MSCI”) and Barlcays Global Investors, N.A. (“Licensee”), dated March, 18, 2000 (the “License Agreement” or “Agreement”),
as follows: 
  

	 	1.	In Exhibit A to the License Agreement, add the following MSCI Indexes: 

 **** 
 MSCI Pacific Free ex-Japan 

MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) ex U.S. 
  

	 	2.	The parties acknowledge that MSCI is in the process of revising its calculation methodology for these indexes and has published new Provisional Indexes for the entire
MSCI index family. This Letter Agreement shall apply to the MSCI indexes using both the current calculation methodology and any revised methodology, including without limitation, a free-float calculation methodology. 


 

	 	3.	The License Agreement will remain in full force and effect as expressly amended herein. This Letter Agreement along with the License Agreement, as amended, constitutes
the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof. 

  







 Barclays Global Investors, N.A. 

May 29, 2001 

Page 2 
 Please
indicate your acceptance of this Letter Agreement by signing below. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Simon Midgen
	Simon Midgen


  

			
	BARCLAYS GLOBAL INVESTORS, N.A.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Bruce Lavine
	Print Name/Title:	 	Bruce Lavine, CFO Individual Investor
	Date Signed:	 	6/28/01
	
	BARCLAYS GLOBAL INVESTORS, N.A.
		
	By:	 	/s/ James G. Polisson
	Print Name/Title:	 	James G. Polisson, Managing Director
	Date Signed:	 	June 28, 2001
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Human-Performance Issues Related to the Design and Operation of Small Modular Reactors (NUREG/CR-7126, BNL-NUREG-96654-2011)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7126 (PDF - 4.03 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:****Date Published:**
**Prepared by:** John O’Hara, Jim Higgins, and Michael Pena

Brookhaven National Laboratory Building 130 Upton, NY 11973

**Prepared for**: Division of Risk Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# L_2015107EN.01007401.xml

| 25.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 107/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 107/74

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/654

of 21 April 2015

appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240(2), first subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas the Secretary-General of the Council should be appointed for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN is hereby appointed Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN by the President of the Council.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 21 April 2015.

For the Council

The President

E. RINKĒVIČS

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                           INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, Ranger Insurance Company ("Ranger") and Odyssey Reinsurance Corporation
("Odyssey") are affiliated companies and subsidiaries of Fairfax Financial
Holdings Limited ("Fairfax"); and

WHEREAS, to provide additional security to purchasers of insurance policies
issued by Ranger, Odyssey and Ranger entered into a Blanket Assumption
Endorsement Agreement (the "Agreement"), attached hereto as Exhibit A, pursuant
to which Odyssey Re would grant to Ranger the right to attach assumption of
liability endorsements (each an "Endorsement") to its policies of insurance; and

WHEREAS, each Endorsement provides that, in the event Ranger fails to pay its
obligations as a result of an adjudicated insolvency, Odyssey, subject always to
the terms of such policy, would become liable for 100% of any unpaid losses
payable under the terms of the related policy and would pay those sums that the
insured under such policy (the "Insured") would be obligated to pay as damages.

NOW THEREFORE, Fairfax undertakes the following:

In the event that Odyssey is required to make payment under any Endorsement as
stipulated in the Agreement, Fairfax will either indemnify Odyssey through
reimbursement to Odyssey of its costs in connection with Odyssey's fulfillment
of the terms of the Agreement, or Fairfax shall make payment directly to the
Insured to the same extent as if Fairfax, rather than Odyssey, were party with
Ranger to the Agreement, and were named on the Endorsement.

It is Fairfax's intent that this Indemnification Agreement shall be an
enforceable obligation, subject to the laws of the State of New York.

                                          FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

                                          By: /s/ ERIC SALSBERG
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              Name: Eric Salsberg
                                              Title:  Vice President, Corporate
                                              Affairs

Dated: March 20, 2001
#### Hottenstine, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Schultz, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Lehner & Lehner*and *Adolph P. Lehner,*all of Oconto Falls, attorneys, and *Howard W. Eslíen*and *Orville S. Luckenbach,*both of Shawano, of counsel.

For the respondent: *David H. Winter,*attorney, and *Marlin M. Vols*of counsel, both of Shawano.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2020 

To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule III of the 

Controlled Substances Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the rescheduling of marijuana into schedule 

III of the Controlled Substances Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCHEDULING OF MARIJUANA. 

4 Notwithstanding section 201 and subsections (a) and 

5 (b) of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

6 U.S.C. 811, 812) respecting the scheduling of controlled 

7 substances, the Attorney General of the United States 

8 shall, by order not later than 60 days after the date of 

9 enactment of this section, transfer marijuana (for purVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:46 Apr 13, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2020.IH H2020

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2020 IH

1 poses of this Act given the same meaning given the term 

2 ‘‘marihuana’’ in section 102 of such Act) from schedule 

3 I of such Act to schedule III of such Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 1 - Power Reactors

# Power Reactors (Division 1): Regulatory Guides 1.221 - 1.240

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 1, "Power Reactors," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 1.1 - 1.20
          - Regulatory Guides 1.21 - 1.40
          - Regulatory Guides 1.41 - 1.60
          - Regulatory Guides 1.61 - 1.80
          - Regulatory Guides 1.81 - 1.100
          - Regulatory Guides 1.101 - 1.120
          - Regulatory Guides 1.121 - 1.140
          - Regulatory Guides 1.141 - 1.160
          - Regulatory Guides 1.161 - 1.180
          - Regulatory Guides 1.181 - 1.200
          - Regulatory Guides 1.201 - 1.220
          - Regulatory Guides 1.221 - 1.240
          - Regulatory Guides 1.241 - 1.253

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Celano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                   |  |                         |  | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael Celano      |  | 
|                   |  | Michael Celano          |  | 
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
From: Jim Topsale/R3/USEPA/US 

To: Ketan Patel/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 01/21/2011 01:44 PM 

Subject: Region 3 HMIWI Rule Issues 

_______________________________________ 

Ketan, 

Good afternoon! I imagine some OAQPS folks may have a different opinion, considering the 

court’s decision not to grant EPA's request for a 15 month extension to promulgate the 

new/amended 112 boiler rules. 

Regarding Region 3, I would like you to know that Maryland now has a draft HMIWI rule that I 

believe is very close to meeting the 10/6/09 rule revision requirements. The draft has been a 

work in progress since early November of last year. 

During my review of Maryland's draft HMIWI rule revisions, I noticed that there was no 

provision to define those authorities retained by the EPA Administrator. After reviewing both 

subparts Ce and Ec, to my surprise, I found that only subpart Ec, section 60.50c(i), contained a 

list of authorities retained by the EPA Administrator. For some reason, I thought that the draft 

subpart Ce and Ec revisions both identified the authorities retained by the EPA Administrator. If 

there are plans for technical amendments to subpart Ce, perhaps that would be a “window of 

opportunity” to include a provision similar to the 6/4/10 proposed CISWI emissions guideline, 

section 60.2542, regarding authorities that will not be delegated to states. 

Jim T.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Prevention Insurance.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan P. Donenfeld, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 July 27, 2011
By:
/s/ ALAN P. DONENFELDAlan P. DonenfeldPresident and Director

Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60614

Summary Calendar

VESSELIN MITKOV-VATKOV;

TATIANA TODOROVA-TODOROVA,

Petitioners,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA Nos. A74-315-988 and A74-315-989

July 24, 1998

Before JOHNSON, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioners Vesselin Mitkov-Vatkov and Tatiana TodorovaTodorova appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision

affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny asylum and

withholding of deportation. 

After a careful review of the record, the arguments and the

controlling authorities, we find that the BIA decision was

supported by substantial evidence. See Gomez-Mejia v. INS, 56 F.3d
2

700, 702 (5th Cir. 1995). The petition for review is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6562

BENJAMIN HUGH HAMMONDS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-598-2) Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Hugh Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Hugh Hammonds seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hammonds has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 13.1

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shih-Jye Cheng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 8, 2007



/s/ Shih-Jye Cheng Name: Shih-Jye ChengTitle: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
  (1)
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the report.
 Date: December 20, 2005/s/ Todd ParkerTodd Parker
Co-Chief Executive Officer (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Co-Chief Financial Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)