alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01799]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 33-10, Considerations for Comparative Test and 
Analysis Based Compliance Findings for Turbine Engine and Auxiliary 
Power Unit Replacement, Redesign and Repaired Parts

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of AC 33-10, Considerations for 
Comparative Test and Analysis Based Compliance Findings for Turbine 
Engine and Auxiliary Power Unit Replacement, Redesign and Replacement 
Parts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the withdrawal of the guidance offered 
in AC 33-10 so it can be revised.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Bouyer, FAA, Rulemaking and 
Policy Branch, ANE-111, Engine and Propeller Directorate Standards 
Staff, Aircraft Certification Service, 12 New England Executive Park, 
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7755; fax: 781-238-7199; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92fff3e0f9bcf0fde7ebf7e0d2f4f3f3bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="422f2330296c202d373b2730022423236c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    We are withdrawing Advisory Circular 33-10 to restructure the 
content and to clarify its intended purpose.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 23, 2015.
Colleen D'Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-01799 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No: II-19-031 July 11, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Surry Nuclear Power Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have 

selected Louis McKown as the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the 

Surry Nuclear Power Station near Surry, Va., located approximately 

17 miles northwest of Newport News.

McKown joins Resident Inspector Carey “Mac” Read at the 

two-unit plant, which is operated by Dominion Energy.

McKown joined the NRC in 2013 and was most recently the 

resident inspector at the Millstone nuclear power plant in Connecticut. 

Prior to that, he was a project engineer for the Division of Reactor 

Projects in the NRC’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa.

Before joining the NRC, McKown worked as a senior systems engineer at the Nine Mile 

Point nuclear power plant in New York, specializing in reactivity controls and emergency core 

cooling systems. 

McKown served in the U.S. Navy for six years as a nuclear reactor operator. He earned a 

bachelor’s degree with highest distinction in mechanical engineering from the University of Kansas.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors

who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Surry resident inspectors can be reached at 404-997-5261.
#### Smith, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Palmer and another, Appellants: Smith and another, Interpleaded Defendants and Respondents.

For the appellants: *John W. O’Leary*and *Elbert Joyce,*both of Neenah.

For the respondent Mary Smith: *Lloyd B. Bongsto*of Green Bay.

For the respondents Barth Smith and American Automobile Insurance Company: *M. E. Davis*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

SEP 3 0 2016 

Dwight E. Mallory 

Environmental/Regulatory Manager 

Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC 

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800 

Denver, Colorado 80203 

In Reply 

Refer To: 

AIR-3 

NU 05-01 

Subject: McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility Final PSD Permit 

Decision 

Dear Mr. Mallory: 

In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended (42 U.S.C 7401 et seq.), the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9 has reviewed your 

application for a CAA Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit for the 

McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility (MCU Facility). 

The MCU facility is an existing oil and gas production operation that is owned, in 

partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and operated by the Resolute 

Natural Resources Company (Resolute), within the Four Comers Area in the Navajo 

Nation Indian Reservation. The application requests permit revisions relating to a federal 

Consent Decree ( United States v. Mobil Exploration and Producing U.S. Inc., Case No. 

2:05-CV-319, filed June 8, 2005) that apply to the Main Flare at the MCU Facility. 

A public notice for the EPA' s proposed permit action was announced in the following 

newspapers in the Four Comers Area: Navajo Times, Farmington Daily Times, Cortez 

Journal, and San Juan Record. Enclosed please find your signed permit and our notice 

announcing the EPA Region 9's final permit decision. This final permit decision will 

become effective thirty (30) days after the service of notice of this final permit decision, 

unless a petition for appeal is properly and timely filed with the EPA's Environmental 

Appeals Board (EAB) under 40 CFR 124.19. 

The final PSD permit, Responses to Public Comments document, and other key 

documents relevant to the final permit are also available through a link at our website, 

Printtd on Rtcycltd Paptr 
http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/prevention-significant-deterioration-psd-permitsissued-region-9, or at http://www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-0AR-2014-0785). 

If you have any questions, you may contact Shaheerah Kelly at (415) 947-4156 or 

kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Acting Director, Air Division 

Enclosures 

cc: Patrick E. Flynn, Resolute Natural Resources Company 

Tom Hormell, McVehil-Monnett Associates, Inc 

Dr. Donald Benn, Navajo Nation EPA 

Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA 

Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA 

Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA 

2
##### 



Exhibit 10.51
  
   Agreement) Company)
 Separation. Separation Date)
 Separation Payments.
  Offer
Letter)) Supplemental
Release




---



##### 



Severance Period
 Stock Options.
 Accrued Salary And Vacation.
 Other Compensation Or Benefits.
 Expense Reimbursements.
 Information Disclosure.
 2




---



##### 



Cooperation. provided, however,
 Return Of Company Property. Company Entities
 Proprietary Information Obligations.
 Non-Solicitation.
 3




---



##### 



Confidentiality.
 Mutual Nondisparagement.
 Release. ADEA
 ADEA Waiver.
 4




---



##### 



Waiver of Unknown Claims.
 A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF
EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY
AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
  Dispute Resolution. JAMS
 Miscellaneous.
 5




---



##### 



provided
  Sincerely,
Photon Dynamics Inc.By:
    /s/ Jeffrey HawthorneName:
    Jeffrey HawthorneTitle:
    President and CEO  /s/ Michael W. SchradleMichael W. SchradleDated: Dec 6, 2007 6




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Supplemental Release
(To be signed on or after the Separation Date)
 Company Agreement Release ADEA
  7




---



##### 



A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF
EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY
AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
  By:
    /s/ Michael W. SchradleMichael W. SchradleDated: 8
#### In the Matter of Lester I. Crandall, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 448]

Mercure, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

On October 14, 1993, the inmate record coordinator at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County was shown an outgoing letter from petitioner with the words "Legal Mail” written on it which was addressed to "Beverly Grayson, Esq.” Upon confirming that the addressee was not listed in the New York State Lawyer’s Manual, the letter was inspected and it was revealed that petitioner had included in the envelope written material not specifically intended for the addressee *(see,*7 NYCRR 720.3 [o]) and was actually writing to another inmate in violation of correspondence procedures which require advance approval *(see,*7 NYCRR 720.3 [b] [3]; 720.6).

Thereafter, a misbehavior report dated October 14, 1993 charged petitioner with violating prison disciplinary rule 180.11, which requires compliance with facility correspondence procedures *(see,*7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [ii]; *see also,*7 NYCRR parts 720, 721). Petitioner was found guilty of this charge following a tier II disciplinary hearing and a penalty was imposed. Following the denial of petitioner’s administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding which was ultimately transferred to this Court.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of guilt. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and petitioner’s own admissions with respect to his letter provided sufficient support for the finding that petitioner was circumventing standard procedures *(see, Matter of Slack v Leonardo,*195 AD2d 892). Although petitioner maintains that the subject letter was a privileged legal communication, it is significant that petitioner never offered any evidence that the addressee actually was a lawyer and his statements at the hearing could be construed as an acknowledgment to the contrary.

We have examined petitioner’s remaining arguments and *763find them to be meritless. The hearing was timely completed following the procurement of a valid extension *(see,*7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]) and petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice to him as a result of the late filing of a certified hearing transcript. Although petitioner alleges bias and collusion on the part of a witness and the Hearing Officer, petitioner has similarly failed "to establish that the 'outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias’ ” *(Matter of Cowart v Pico,*213 AD2d 853, 855 *lv denied*85 NY2d 812, quoting *Matter of Raqiyb v Coughlin,*186 AD2d 328).

Cardona, P. J., White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated March 5, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard D.    Kinder                                  |
|---------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |  | Richard D. Kinder    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
**Exhibit 10.2****Extension Agreement**     This Extension Agreement is dated as of March 22, 2006 between Tollgrade Communications,Inc., having an address at 493 Nixon Road, Cheswick, PA 15024 (“Tollgrade”) and Bulova TechnologiesEMS LLC, with an address at 3900 W. Sarno Rd., Melbourne, FL 32934 (“Bulova Technologies”).     **WHEREAS,**Tollgrade (as successor in interest to Acterna Corporation) and Bulova Technologies(as successor in interest to Dictaphone Corporation’s Electronic Manufacturing Services Division)are parties to a Supply Agreement dated July 25, 2002, which sets forth the terms pursuant to whichBulova Technologies manufactures and supplies to Tollgrade, and Tollgrade purchases from Bulova,certain products (the “Supply Agreement”);     **WHEREAS,**the Supply Agreement was initially scheduled to expire on July 24, 2004, and has beensuccessively extended through March 31, 2006;     **WHEREAS,**Tollgrade and Bulova Technologies desire to replace the Supply Agreement with a newsupply agreement, but have not yet completed negotiations with respect to such new supplyagreement; and     **WHEREAS,**Tollgrade and Bulova Technologies desire to further extend the term of the SupplyAgreement through September 30, 2006 or until a new supply agreement is executed, if sooner;     **NOW THEREFORE,**in consideration of the premises contained herein and for other good andvaluable consideration, the parties agree as follows:     **1. ****Extension of Supply Agreement**. The parties hereby agree that the Supply Agreementis hereby extended through September 30, 2006 or until such time as the parties execute a newsupply agreement, if sooner.     **2. ****Miscellaneous**. Except as extended hereby, the provisions of the Supply Agreementshall remain in full force and effect. This Extension Agreement will be governed in all respects bythe laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without reference to any choice of law provisions.This Extension Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different partieshereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original, butall such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the date first above written.         **TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**   **BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES EMS LLC**         By: /s/ Jennifer M. Reinke   By: /s/ James Davis         Name: Jennifer M. Reinke   Name: James DavisTitle: Assistant Secretary   Title: President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              2,565,563 
<SECURITIES>                                                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                          12,595               
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0 
<INVENTORY>                                         2,741,454 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    7,157,826 
<PP&E>                                             21,173,908 
<DEPRECIATION>                                        661,037 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     32,600,275 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              13,794,425 
<BONDS>                                                     0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0 
<PREFERRED>                                               316 
<COMMON>                                                9,211 
<OTHER-SE>                                          6,758,798 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       32,600,275 
<SALES>                                                     0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,041,625  
<CGS>                                                 456,947 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,268,132  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (222,671) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,112,508 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,116,395) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,116,395) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0 
<CHANGES>                                                   0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,116,395) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.13) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.13) 
                                                    
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This RESTATED schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed   Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  as  of  September  30,  1997  and  the
Consolidated  Statement of Income for the nine months ended  September  30, 1997
and is qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         23,724
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                      180
<INVENTORY>                                     4,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,573
<PP&E>                                          5,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,576
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,361
<SALES>                                        27,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               27,650
<CGS>                                          10,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.38
        


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# NMSS Decommissioning Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1727)

## Contents

        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1727 (PDF - 38.80 MB)

## Publication Information

**Maunscript Published:** September 2000**Date Published:** September 2000

Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations require that a licensee must submit a decommissioning plan to support the decommissioning of its facility when it is required by license condition, or if the NRC has not approved the procedures and activities necessary to carry out the decommissioning and these procedures could increase the potential health and safety impacts to the workers or the public. In July 1998 the NRC directed the staff to develop a Standard Review Plan (SRP) that incorporates a risk-informed, iterative approach and provides clear guidance on complying with the As Low As is Reasonably Achievable provisions in the final License Termination Rule. This NUREG is the culmination of that staff effort and was presented to the Commission in July 2000, with staff indicating that it intended to commence using the SRP in September 2000. The goal of the SRP is to allow the NRC staff to evaluate information submitted by licensees in a timely, efficient, consistent manner and in such a way that the public health and safety is protected and the facility can be released in accordance with NRC's requirements. The SRP provides NRC staff with a description of the contents of specific decommissioning plan modules, as well as evaluation and acceptance criteria for use in reviewing decommissioning plans and other information submitted by licensees to demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release in accordance with NRC requirements:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Accenture Ltd: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-112854 and 333-104628) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-65376) on Form S-8 of Accenture
Ltd of our report dated October 27, 2004 relating to the financial statements
of the Accenture Ltd 2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan as of August 31, 2004
and 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31,
2004, which report appears in this Form 10-K of Accenture Ltd. /s/ KPMG LLPChicago,
Illinois November 3, 2004