5086 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Notices 

6See Preliminary Determination, 79 FR 43393, 

43394 (July 25, 2014). 

7The following subsidy programs in the final 

determination of the concurrent countervailing duty 

investigation are export subsidies: Discounted 

Loans for Export-Oriented Enterprises (1.06 

percent), Export Credits from China’s Export-Import 

Bank (1.06 percent), Export Credit Insurance from 

China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation 

(Sinosure) (1.06 percent), Foreign Trade 

Development Fund (0.55 percent), Famous Brands 

Program (0.55 percent), Provision of Shipping for 

LTAR (5.34 percent). Therefore, we have offset the 

PRC-wide rate of 210.52 percent by the 

countervailing duty rate attributable to export 

subsidies (i.e., 9.62 percent). See Calcium 

Hypochlorite From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination, 79 FR 74064 (December 15, 2014) 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at 7. 

1See Letter from Petitioners, Re: Request for a 

2013/2014 (Fifth) Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China, dated September 30, 2014. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

64565, 64567 (October 30, 2014) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’). 

3See id. 

4See Letter from Petitioners, Re: Petitioners’ 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, 

dated January 14, 2015. 

5On November 12, 2014, Petitioners filed a 

request for the Department to refer to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) information placed 

on the record concerning enforcement of the order. 

See Letter from Petitioners, Re: Comments on 

Customs and Border Protection Information, dated 

November 12, 2014. The Department intends to 

refer the information contained in this submission 

to CBP. 

period to no more than six months.6 In 

the underlying investigation, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Determination on July 25, 2014. 

Therefore, the six-month period 

beginning on the date of the publication 

of the Preliminary Determination ended 

on January 21, 2015. Furthermore, 

section 737(b) of the Act states that 

definitive duties are to begin on the date 

of publication of the ITC’s final injury 

determination. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

733(d) of the Act and our practice, we 

will instruct CBP to terminate the 

suspension of liquidation and to 

liquidate, without regard to 

antidumping duties, unliquidated 

entries of calcium hypochlorite from the 

PRC entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption after 

January 21, 2015, the date the 

provisional measures expired, and 

through the day preceding the date of 

publication of the ITC’s final injury 

determination in the Federal Register. 

Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin 

The weighted-average antidumping 

duty margin percentage is as follows: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

PRC-Wide Entity ....... 210.52 7

This notice constitutes the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

calcium hypochlorite from the PRC, 

pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. 

Interested parties may contact the 

Department’s Central Records Unit, 

Room 7043 of the main Commerce 

building, for copies of an updated list of 

antidumping duty orders currently in 

effect. 

This order is published in accordance 

with sections 736(a) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.211(b). 

Date: January 26, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01798 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–941] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on kitchen 

appliance shelving and racks (‘‘kitchen 

racks’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period September 

1, 2013 through August 31, 2014. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 30, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–7906. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 30, 2014, based on a 

timely request for review by SSW 

Holding Company, Inc. and Nashville 

Wire Products, Inc. (collectively, 

‘‘Petitioners’’),1 the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on kitchen racks from the PRC covering 

the period September 1, 2013 through 

August 31, 2014.2 The review covers 

nine companies.3 On January 14, 2015, 

Petitioners withdrew their request for an 

administrative review on all of the nine 

companies listed in the Initiation 

Notice.4 No other party requested a 

review of these companies or any other 

exporters of subject merchandise. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. In 

this case, Petitioners timely withdrew 

their request by the 90-day deadline, 

and no other party requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order. As a result, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we 

are rescinding, in its entirety, the 

administrative review of kitchen racks 

from the PRC for the period September 

1, 2013 through August 31, 2014.5

Assessment 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Because the 

Department is rescinding this 

administrative review in its entirety, the 

entries to which this administrative 

review pertained shall be assessed 

antidumping duties at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, if appropriate. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Notices 5087 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 44740 

(August 1, 2014). 

2See Letter from the petitioners to the 

Department, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

the People’s Republic of China: Request for 

Administrative Review’’ (August 29, 2014). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

58729 (September 30, 2014). 

4See Letter from the petitioners to the 

Department, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review’’ (December 16, 

2014). 

1The Department initiated the instant review on 

both TMM and TMI. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews 

and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 36462 

(June 27, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). In the 2011– 

2012 review of the order, the Department 

Continued 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01812 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–886] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 30, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jerrold Freeman or Minoo Hatten AD/

CVD Operations Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0180 and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2014, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) for the period of review (POR) 

August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014.1

On August 29, 2014, the petitioners, the 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag 

Committee and its individual members, 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag 

Corporation, requested an 

administrative review of the order with 

respect to Dongguan Nozawa Plastics 

Products Co., Ltd. and United Power 

Packaging, Ltd. (collectively, Nozawa).2

On September 30, 2014, in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (Act) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review of the order on 

PRCBs from the PRC with respect to 

Nozawa.3 On December 16, 2014, the 

petitioners timely withdrew their 

request for an administrative review of 

Nozawa.4

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, ‘‘in whole or in 

part, if a party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review.’’ The 

petitioners withdrew their request for 

review within the 90-day time limit. 

Because we received no other requests 

for review of Nozawa and no other 

requests for the review of the order on 

PRCBs from the PRC with respect to 

other companies subject to the order, we 

are rescinding the administrative review 

of the order in full in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of PRCBs from the 

PRC during the POR at rates equal to the 

cash deposit or bonding rate of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01813 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–832] 

Pure Magnesium From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2013, through April 

30, 2014. This review covers one PRC 

company, Tianjin Magnesium 

International, Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) and 

Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘TMM’’) (collectively ‘‘TMI/TMM’’).1


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES