alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Columbia Generating Station (NUREG-2123)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2123, Vol. 1 (PDF - 4.23 MB)
        - NUREG-2123, Vol. 2 (PDF - 1.54 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2012

**Date Published:** May 2012

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Columbia Generating Station (Columbia), license renewal application (LRA) by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (the staff). By letter dated January 19, 2010, Energy Northwest (the applicant) submitted the LRA in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the Code of Federal Regulations, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." Energy Northwest requests renewal of the operating license (Facility Operating License Number NPF-21) for a period of 20 years beyond the current license period of December 20, 2023.

Columbia is located approximately 12 miles north of Richland, WA. The NRC issued the construction permit on March 19, 1973, and the operating license for Columbia on April 13, 1984. The unit is a Mark II boiling-water reactor (BWR) design. General Electric Company supplied the nuclear steam supply system. Burns and Roe, Inc., designed the balance of plant, and Bechtel Power Corporation constructed the plant. The licensed power output of the unit is 3,886 megawatts thermal, with a gross electrical output of approximately 1,230 megawatts electric.

This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted through January 4, 2012. The six open items previously identified by the staff from the SER with open items have been closed (see SER Section 1.5); the staff did not identify any open items before the staff made a final determination. SER Section 6.0 provides the staff's final conclusion of the LRA review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SAMUEL J. MOORE,

 Petitioner

 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 136 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motion to Strike are DENIED.
**Bateman & Co., Inc., P.C.**

Certified Public Accountants

5 Briardale Court

Houston, Texas 77027-2904

(713) 552-9800

FAX (713) 552-9700

www.batemanhouston.com

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

We consent to the inclusion in this Form
10-KSB/A of Neutron Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2003, on our
audit of the financial statements of Neutron Enterprises, Inc., as of December
31, 2002, and for the period then ended.



/s/ Bateman & Co. Inc. P.C.

BATEMAN & CO., INC., P.C..

Houston, Texas

May 8, 2003

Member

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PRACTISING ACCOUNTANTS

Offices in Principal Cities Around The World
Exhibit
10.16

    


    Arno
Therapeutics, Inc.

    4
Campus Drive, Second
Floor

    Parsippany,
New Jersey 07054

    


    August
19, 2010

    


    J. Chris
Houchins

    27 Saw
Mills Rd

    Warren,
NJ  07059

    


    Dear
Chris:

    


    This shall confirm our recent
discussions with respect to certain terms of your employment with Arno
Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”).  In particular, you hereby confirm
that during the term of your employment with the Company, and for a period of
one year thereafter, you will not, directly or indirectly, without the Company’s
prior written consent:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              (i)

            	
              solicit
      or induce any employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to leave
      the employ of the Company or such subsidiaries;
  or

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              (ii)

            	
              solicit
      the business of any customer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
      with respect to products or services similar to and competitive with those
      provided or supplied by the Company or any of its
      subsidiaries.

            


    

     

    Notwithstanding paragraph (ii) above,
nothing contained herein shall restrict your ability to work with or solicit the
business of any of the numerous clinical trial centers and CROs, clinical study
sites, laboratories, investigators, consultants, or other clinical trial vendors
that perform services for the Company.

     

    This letter shall serve as an amendment
to that certain letter agreement between you and the Company dated September 12,
2007.

     

    Please confirm your agreement with the
foregoing by signing in the space below and returning a fully-executed copy of
this letter to me.  We appreciate your efforts and contributions to
the Company.

     

    
      	 
      	
              Arno
      Therapeutics, Inc.

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              /s/ David M. Tanen

            	 
      
	 
      	
              David
      M. Tanen

            	 
      
	 
      	
              President

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              Acknowledged
      and agreed to

            	 
      
	
              this
      26th day of August, 2010:

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              /s/ J. Chris Houchins

            	 
      	 
      
	
              J.
      Chris Houchins
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Subsequent License Renewal for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3, Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 10, Second Renewal)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 10, Second Renewal, Final Report  (PDF – 12.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2020**Date Published:**January 2020

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff prepared this final supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) as part of its environmental review of the Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) subsequent license renewal application, to renew the operating licenses for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 (Peach Bottom, or Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3) for an additional 20 years. This final SEIS includes the NRC staff’s evaluation of the environmental impacts of the subsequent license renewal as well as alternatives to subsequent license renewal. Alternatives to subsequent license renewal considered in this SEIS include: (1) a new nuclear power alternative, (2) a supercritical pulverized coal alternative, (3) a natural gas combined-cycle alternative, and (4) a combination alternative of natural gas combined-cycle, wind, solar, and purchased power. The NRC staff's recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of subsequent license renewal for Peach Bottom are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. The NRC staff based its recommendation on the following:
        - the NRC's analysis and findings in NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants"
        - the environmental report submitted by Exelon
        - the NRC staff’s consultation with Federal, State, Tribal, and local government agencies
        - the NRC staff’s independent environmental review
        - the NRC staff’s consideration of public comments received during the scoping process and received during the comment period on the draft SEIS

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 19, 2024
# L_2015196EN.01001501.xml

| 24.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1210

of 20 July 2015

appointing an Estonian member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Estonian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Toomas VITSUT, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Toomas VITSUT,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| | Mr Kalev KALLO, Chairman of Tallinn City Council. |
| --- | --- |

Mr Kalev KALLO, Chairman of Tallinn City Council.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against a Natural Circulation Experiment in Nuclear Power Plant Borssele (NUREG/IA-0091, ECN-89-91)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0091 (PDF 1.98 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** July 1993

**Prepared by:** L. Winters

Ministry of Social Affairs Nuclear Inspectorate (KFD) Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN P.O. Box 1 1755 ZG Petten The Netherlands

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As part of the ICAP (International Code Assessment and Applications Program) agreement between ECN (Netherlands Energy Research Foundation) and USNRC, ECN has performed a number of assessment calculations for the thermohydraulic system analysis code RELAP5/MOD2/36.05. This document describes the assessment of this computer program versus a natural circulation experiment as conducted at the Borssele Nuclear Power Plant. The results of this comparison show that the code RELAP5/MOD2 predicts well the natural circulation behaviour of Nuclear Power Plant Borssele.

The work has been sponsored by the Dutch Licensing Authority and ECN.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
-78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12.1


                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
               and Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends
                                 (In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                 1999              2000             2001
<S>                                                          <C>               <C>              <C>
Pretax loss from continuing operations before
  equity in unconsolidated affiliates                        $ (183,545)       $ (315,217)      $ (414,445)
                                                             ----------        ----------       ----------
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                                 64,904           122,102          136,298
Interest expense in discontinued operations                          55                22                -
Interest expense in rentals                                         754             1,045            2,299
                                                             ----------        ----------       ----------
Total fixed charges                                              65,713           123,169          138,597
                                                             ----------        ----------       ----------
Earnings before fixed charges                                $ (117,832)       $ (192,048)      $ (275,848)
                                                             ==========         =========       ==========

Pretax preferred dividend requirement                        $   16,751        $   60,688       $   72,090
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends                   82,465           183,857          210,687
Deficiency in earnings for fixed charges                       (183,545)         (315,217)        (414,445)
Deficiency in earnings for combined fixed charges
  and preferred dividends                                      (200,296)         (375,905)        (486,535)

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I,
Timothy Carew, P.Geo., do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure
regarding the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the
Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form
40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form
of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ Timothy Carew           
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     | Timothy Carew, P.Geo., MIMMM
| |     | Professional Geoscientist   
| |     | Reserva International LLC   

---
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") of Midwest
Generation, LLC (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of
his or her knowledge and belief, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGIA R. NELSONGeorgia R. Nelson
Manager and President
Midwest Generation, LLC
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith
Manager and Vice President
Midwest Generation, LLC 

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Midwest Generation, LLC and will be retained by Midwest Generation, LLC and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 2019

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 30, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 30, 2022
No. 86-1034.

#### Virginia *v.*American Booksellers Assn., Inc., et al.

Appeal from C. A. 4th Cir. Probable jurisdiction *1083noted. In addition to the question presented on appeal, the parties are directed to brief and argue the question of appellees’ standing.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffHuman-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700)

# Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700, Revision 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0700, Revision 3 (PDF – 5.41 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2019**Date Published:**July 2020

Authors:J.M. O'Hara, BNL*S. Fleger, NRC

Brookhaven National Laboratory*Nuclear Science & Technology DepartmentUpton, NY 11973-5000

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of nuclear power plants in accordance with the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800, *Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition*). The *Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model* (NUREG-0711, Revision 3, issued November 2012) contains detailed design review procedures. As part of the review process, the interfaces between plant personnel and the plant’s systems and components are evaluated for conformance with HFE guidelines. This document, *Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines* (NUREG-0700, Revision 3), provides the guidelines necessary to perform this evaluation. The review guidelines address the physical and functional characteristics of human-system interfaces (HSIs). Because these guidelines only address the HFE aspects of design and not other related considerations, such as instrumentation and control and structural design, they are referred to as HFE guidelines. In addition to the review of actual HSIs, the NRC staff can use the NUREG-0700 guidelines to evaluate a design-specific HFE guidelines document or style guide. The HFE guidelines are organized into four basic parts, which are divided into sections. Part I contains guidelines for the basic HSI elements: information displays, user-interface interaction and management, and analog displays and controls. These elements are used as building blocks to develop HSI systems to serve specific functions. Part II contains the guidelines for reviewing the following HSI systems: alarm system, safety parameter display system, group-view display system, soft control system, computer-based procedure system, automation system, and communication system. Part III provides guidelines for the review of workstations and workplaces. Part IV provides guidelines for the review of HSI support (i.e., maintainability of digital systems and degraded HSI and instrumentation and control conditions).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021

#### Related Information

            - Contact us about NUREG-0700

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
*April 11, 1939.*

#### Fronczek, Respondent, vs. Sink and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Hale ■& Skemp*of La Crosse.

For the respondent: *George H. Gordon, Law & Brody*of La Crosse.

*By the Court.*

— Order affirmed.