alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the periodic report amendment of Endocare,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael R.Rodriguez, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best ofmy knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the    periods indicated.     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.     /s/ Michael R. Rodriguez       Michael R. Rodriguez     Senior Vice President, Finance and     Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 16, 2005
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2002

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
Ex. 99.2

I, Stamatis Molaris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stelmar Shipping Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 04, 2004

/s/ Stamatis Molaris
---------------------------
    Stamatis Molaris
    Chief Financial Officer


02509.0004 #491150
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 8, 2007



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName: Shou-Kang ChenTitle: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Aging, Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA), and HighPotential Testing of Damaged Cables (NUREG/CR-6095, SAND93-1803)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6095 (PDF - 2.89 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1994**Date Published:**April 1994

**Prepared by:** R.A. Vigil (SEA) M.J. Jacobus (SNL)

Science and Engineering Associates, Inc. (SEA) 6100 Uptown Blvd, NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110

Under Contract to: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-5800 Operated by Sandia Corporation

**Prepared for:** Division of Reactor Controls and Human Factors Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC FIN L-1903

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Experiments were conducted to assess the effects of high potential testing of cables and to assess the survivability of aged and damaged cables under Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) conditions. High potential testing at 240 Vdc/mil on undamaged cables suggested that no damage was incurred on the selected virgin cables. During aging and LOCA testing, Okonite ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) cables with a bonded jacket experienced unexpected failures. The failures appear to be primarily related to the level of thermal aging and the presence of a bonded jacket that ages more rapidly than the insulation. For Brand Rex crosslinked polyolefin (XLPO) cables, the results suggest that 7 mils of insulation remaining should give the cables a high probability of surviving accident exposure following aging. The voltage necessary to detect when 7 mils of insulation remain on unaged Brand Rex cables is approximately 35 kVdc. This voltage level would almost certainly be unacceptable to a utility for use as a damage assessment tool. However, additional tests indicated that a 35 kVdc voltage application would not damage virgin Brand Rex cables when tested in water. Although two damaged Rockbestos silicone rubber cables also failed during the accident test, no correlation between failures and level of damage was apparent.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### SHAMROCK GOLF COMPANY, Appellant, v. RICHCRAFT, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 81-5939.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 1982.

Decided June 30, 1982.

*646Richard M. Moneymaker, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Stuart L. Brody, Valensi & Rose, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Shamrock Golf Company appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its appeal from the bankruptcy judge’s order adjudicating Shamrock to be bankrupt. The parties agree that the case is subject to the law in effect prior to the enactment of the 1978 Bankruptcy Code. The order of involuntary bankruptcy was based on the assumption that the original petition was timely, i.e. that it was filed within four months of the date of the alleged preferential transfers, in compliance with 11 U.S.C. § 21(aX2), prior to its repeal.

The issue is a narrow one and it is not necessary to dwell on the factual details. The original petition was filed on October 20, 1977. The transfers that form the basis of the allegations of preference were by checks that were delivered on June 17, 1977, but not presented to the drawee bank for payment until June 20 and 21, 1977. The checks were paid and not dishonored on that date or thereafter.

Shamrock’s position is that the payment was complete on June 17 and the transfers were not made within the statutory four-month period, thus the original petition was not timely filed. We agree. In *Engstrom*v. *Wiley,*191 F.2d 684, 686 (9th Cir. 1951), we held that payment by check constituted a “cash” sale, and was therefore a “contemporaneous transfer,” so long as the check was presented within a reasonable time and not dishonored. The same position is taken as to contemporaneous transfers in Section 547(c) of the 1978 Code. Indeed, the Notes of the Senate Judiciary Committee state:

> “Contrary to the language contained in the House Report, payment of a debt by means of a check is equivalent to a cash payment, unless the check is dishonored. Payment is considered to be made when the check is delivered for purposes of Section 547(c)(1) and (2).”

We rely on rationale that applies to situations dealing with contemporaneous transfers as an exception to the preference provisions of the bankruptcy statutes. But the same rationale applies in cases arising under the four-month provision of Section 21(a)(2). We believe *Engstrom v. Wiley*is analogous to the present situation and we are not persuaded that general escrow law, cited by the creditors, should apply, e.g. *Fitzpatrick v. Philco Finance Corp.,*491 F.2d 1288 (7th Cir. 1974).

Given this disposition of the case, we need not address the other issues raised by appellant. Reversed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2019

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 27, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 27, 2020
AAM-12-172-E 

January 26, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10060A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0456 

Mr. Grant E. Goetsch 

Vice President, Flight Operations 

Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. 

Dane County Regional Airport 

3606 Corben Court 

Madison, WI 53704-2573 

Dear Mr. Goetsch: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10060. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. (Wisconsin Aviation) for an extension of Exemption 

No. 10060. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows Wisconsin Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulation, to cover 

its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Wisconsin 

Aviation. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10060 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Wisconsin Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Wisconsin Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10060 to January 31, 2014 unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption 

No. 10060. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark E. Ties, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| |  | /s/     MARK E. TIESMark E. Ties Chief Financial Officer May 13, 2003
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2





KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and will be retained by Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                         |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  March
  14, 2006 |  | /s/ Kimberly A. Dang                                       
|                         |  | Kimberly A. Dang
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





---

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2101 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to expand the ability 

of trade associations to solicit contributions from the stockholders and 

executive or administrative personnel of their member corporations, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2017 

Mr. AMODEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

expand the ability of trade associations to solicit contributions from the stockholders and executive or administrative personnel of their member corporations, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prior Approval Reform 

5 Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2101 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING ABILITY OF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS TO 

2 SOLICIT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBER 

3 CORPORATIONS. 

4 (a) SOLICITATIONS.—Section 316(b)(4)(D) of the 

5 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 

6 30118(b)(4)(D)) is amended by striking ‘‘to the extent 

7 that’’ and all that follows and inserting a period. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply to solicitations made on or after 

10 January 1, 2018. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                       510
<INVENTORY>                                      7,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,285
<PP&E>                                          26,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,387
<BONDS>                                         15,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,860
<SALES>                                         24,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,672
<CGS>                                           20,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    347
<INCOME-TAX>                                        52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>