alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015317EN.01003501.xml

| 3.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/35

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/2237

of 30 November 2015

appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Peter KOFOD POULSEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Peter KOFOD POULSEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Niels Erik SØNDERGAARD, Southern Denmark Regional Councillor. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Niels Erik SØNDERGAARD, Southern Denmark Regional Councillor.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2015.

For the Council

The President

É. SCHNEIDER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 1999

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr., SE, Suite 1154, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-9000 

Mark Williams, Commissioner 

Environmental Protection Division 

F. Allen Barnes, Director 

Phone: 404/656·7802 FAX: 404/651-9425 

December 5, 2011 

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

RE: Proposal to list Macon Naval Ordnance Plant on tbe National Priorities List 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

This letter will provide Georgia's concurrence witb tbe proposed listing of tbe former Macon Naval 

Ordnance Plant (MNOP) (tbe Site) on tbe National Priorities List (NPL). An extensive groundwater 

plume containing Trichloroethylene is discharging to tbe wetlands adjacent to Rocky Creek. 

Additionally, soils at tbe Site, sediments in drainage ditches onsite and in Rocky Creek are 

contaminated witb Mercury as a result of tbe operations at tbis formerly used defense site (FUDS). 

The NPL listing will help compel tbe PRPs to move forward witb tbe investigation and remedial 

action that is needed at tbe Site. 

We appreciate EPA's assistance and partnership in addressing tbis Site. We look forward to working 

witb your staff through tbe listing, investigation and oversight process. If you have any questions, 

please contact Amy Potter at 404-657-8604. 

F. Allen Barnes 

Director 

FAB:ap 


File: FMNOP (B) 


S:\rdrive\amy\DoD Unit\FUDS\FMNOP\:mpport letter for FMNOP-AIP listing.doc
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 3, 2005 /s/ Stephen N. Joffe     Stephen N. Joffe  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   Date: August 3, 2005 /s/ Alan Buckey     Alan Buckey  Chief Financial Officer
18
Issue Date: 10/01/79 - 1 - 9900 STS 4.2.8.X.X

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL

PART 9900: TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

STS428.TG

STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

SECTION 4.2.8.X.X.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS - 125-VOLT BATTERY BANK

A. PURPOSE

Provide guidance to the inspector regarding information that should

be included in surveillance test procedures for determining

electrolyte level in stationary batteries.

B. DISCUSSION

Section 4.2.8.X.X. of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS)

requires periodic determinations of the electrolyte level in each

pilot cell and each connected cell of the station battery. The

Gould Battery Company has developed specific criteria which is used

to determine the electrolyte level needed to ascertain the true

specific gravity of the electrolyte. The true specific gravity is

an indicator of cell capacity and any downward change denotes a need

for corrective action. The criteria are applicable to all wet

storage batteries and include the type of information that should

be incorporated in licensee surveillance test procedures. The Gould

criteria are as follows:

1. Electrolyte levels should be recorded and specific gravity

readings adjusted accordingly.

2. Electrolyte levels should be recorded only when the cells are

in a floating mode of operation.

3. Electrolyte levels should be recorded monthly as stated on

IEEE-450.

4. Electrolyte levels should be recorded any time that a true

specific gravity reading is required. The true specific

gravity reading is needed to determine if there is a downward

change in cell capacity. This will indicate corrective action

and eliminate battery problems.

5. If a battery has received an equalize charge, the electrolyte

levels should not be taken until the cell has been placed on
9900 STS 4.2.8.X.X - 2 - Issue Date: 10/01/79

float for a minimum of 72 hours after completion of the

equalize charge.
Issue Date: 10/01/79 - 3 - 9900 STS 4.2.8.X.X

C. REFERENCE

Ltr. W. Hurley, Gould, to F. Maura, RIII, dtd 6/15/79

END
HomeRadioactive WasteHigh-Level Waste DisposalHistorical Information

# High-Level Waste Disposal Meeting Archive

The meeting archives are divided into four categories on this page:
        - Licensing Meetings between NRC and DOE
        - Public Outreach Meetings
        - Technical Meetings Between NRC and DOE Including Meetings to Resolve Key Technical Issues 
        - Quality Assurance and Management Meetings Between NRC and DOE

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## Licensing Meetings between NRC and DOE

## Public Outreach Meetings

## Technical Meetings Between NRC and DOE Including Meetings to Resolve Key Technical Issues

## Quality Assurance and Management Meetings Between NRC and DOE

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Review of DOE's Site Characterization Process
          - Review of DOE's Site Recommendation
          - Review of DOE's EIS for Yucca Mountain
          - Development of Licensing Criteria
          - Meeting Archive

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20161 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAM AHMAD KHEIR, Defendant-Appellant

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-4258 & H-90-CR-121-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sam Ahmad Kheir, # 52978-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Kheir’s arguments on appeal differ from those he presented to the district court. Kheir’s district court arguments are deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Kheir’s appellate arguments that were not raised below are reviewed for plain error.2

Highlands Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire , 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). Having reviewed the record and Kheir’s appellate arguments regarding his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, we find that any errors that may have existed did not cause prejudice sufficient to warrant relief under § 2255. See United States v. Smith , 915 F.2d 959, 963 (5th Cir. 1990). Certainly, they do not rise to the level of plain error. AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JACK LEON CLARKE,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2016-2420

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 14-2699, Senior Judge Bruce E. 

Kasold.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

REBECCA HARKER DUTTRY, McDermott, Will & Emery 

LLP, Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellant. 

Also represented by JOSHUA DAVID ROGACZEWSKI. 

NATHANAEL YALE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by CHAD A. READLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN,

JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; SAMANTHA ANN SYVERSON, Y.
 

KEN LEE, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Research Activities (NUREG-1925)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# L_2015005EN.01001401.xml

| 9.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 5/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 5/14

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/30

of 17 December 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium's application to register the name ‘Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium's application to register the name ‘Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Potjesvlees uit de Westhoek’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2 Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) of Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2014.

For the Commission

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 260, 9.8.2014, p. 13.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### MICHAEL JONES *vs.*WILLIAM B. MORRIS, Ex’r. &c.

Where the defendant, in consideration of a debt he owed, agreed to let the. plaintiff have a bed. and furniture of the value of $S8, but no particular bed and furniture were conveyed or delivered, and afterwards the defendant r.efused to deliver any bed and furniture, *Held,*that the action of trover tyould,not li? for the plaintiff.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of McDowell-County, at the Spring Term, 1847, his Honor Judge. Dicic presiding.

*373This was trover for a bed and furniture, tried on not guilty. The case was, that Morris was found to be indebted to Jones, on a settlement, in the sum of $60; and they agreed that the former should give the latter his note for $32, (which he did,) and also should give him a bed and furniture at the price of $28, being the residue of the debt, when Jones should apply for it at the house of Morris. Shortly afterwards, Jones went there for the purpose of getting the bed and furniture, and met Morris at the gate going from the house, who,requested plaintiff to go to the house, saying he would be back soon. The plaintiff went in but was ordered out by Mrs. Morris, and went away without seeing Morris, and then brought this suit. The Court expressed the opinion, that the plaintiff could not recover, because he made no demand on Morris for the bed and furniture, and also because he failed to prove a conversion, and in submission thereto the plaintiff suffered a non suit and appealed.

*Guión,*for the plaintiff.

*Edney,*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

A demand was really immaterial, for if it had been made and refused, it would not have entitled the plaintiff to recover in this form. His case fails, because he has not shewn a property in any bed and furniture, which could be converted to his prejudice. The agreement between the parties was merely executory, obliging Morris to convey and deliver to the plaintiff some bed and furniture of the value of $28, and not amounting to a conveyance or delivery of any bed and furniture in particular, so as to vest the title in the plaintiff. The action was therefore misconceived and cannot be sustained.

Per Curiam,. Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.02
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
for the periods presented therein.
 Date: August  7, 2006
    

/s/
Robert FreemanRobert FreemanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Soil-to-Plant Concentration Ratios for Assessing Food-Chain Pathways in Biosphere Models (NUREG/CR-6941)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6941 (PDF - 4.55 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2007**Date Published:** August 2007 

**Prepared by:** B.A. Napier, R.J. Fellows, K.M. Krupka

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

P.R. Reed, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Fuel, Engineering and Radiological Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6469

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes work performed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's project *Assessment of Food Chain Pathway Parameters in Biosphere Models*, which was established to assess and evaluate a number of key parameters used in the food-chain models used in performance assessments of radioactive waste disposal facilities. Section 2 of this report summarizes characteristics of samples of soils and groundwater from three geographical regions of the United States, the Southeast, Northwest, and Southwest, and analyses performed to characterize their physical and chemical properties. Because the uptake and behavior of radionuclides in plant roots, plant leaves, and animal products depends on the chemistry of the water and soil coming in contact with plants and animals, water and soil samples collected from these regions of the United States were used in experiments at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to determine radionuclide soil-to-plant concentration ratios. Crops and forage used in the experiments were grown in the soils, and long-lived radionuclides introduced into the groundwater provide the contaminated water used to water the grown plants. The radionuclides evaluated include 99Tc, 238Pu, and 241Am. Plant varieties include alfalfa, corn, onion, and potato. The radionuclide uptake results from this research study show how regional variations in water quality and soil chemistry affect radionuclide uptake. Section 3 summarizes the procedures and results of the uptake experiments, and relates the soil-to-plant uptake factors derived. In Section 4, the results found in this study are compared with similar values found in the biosphere modeling literature; the study's results are generally in line with current literature, but soil- and plant-specific differences are noticeable. This food-chain pathway data may be used by the NRC staff to assess dose to persons in the reference biosphere (e.g., persons who live and work in an area potentially affected by radionuclide releases) of waste disposal facilities and decommissioning sites.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, February 04, 2015, 9 a.m. to February 05, 2015, 2 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 09, 2015, 80 FR 1427.                

                    The meeting notice is amended to reflect that that the open session of the meeting will be available via                     *http://videocast.nih.gov/​summary.asp?​live=​15490&​bhcp=​1.*                     The meeting is partially closed to the public.                

Dated:  January 21, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2015-01370 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P