alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2021

# Recent FOIA Requests - October 2021

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during September 2021. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 2, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 2, 2021
#### Rohde and another, Appellants, vs. Olson and others, Respondents.

For the appellants: *Kileen & Kileen*of Wautoma, and *M. S. King*of Wisconsin Rapids.

For the respondents: *R. W. Peterson*of Berlin, attorney, and *Wilkie, Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman*of Madison of counsel.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 8 - Occupational Health

# Occupational Health (Division 8): Regulatory Guides 8.1 - 8.20

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 8, "Occupational Health," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 8.1 - 8.20
          - Regulatory Guides 8.21 - 8.40

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
No. 91-6112.

#### Augustus *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Review of Exemptions and General Licenses for Fissile Material in 10 CFR 71 (NUREG/CR-7239, ORNL/TM-2013/57)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7239 (PDF – 2.53 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2017**Date Published:** January 2018

**Prepared by:** Douglas G. Bowen and Cecil V. Parks

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

A. Barto, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code J5728

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Title 10 of the United States (US) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 71, Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material, includes requirements for the transport of fissile material in packages. These regulations provide requirements for packages that are certified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to transport fissile material. 10 CFR 71 also includes provisions for exemptions from classification as fissile material (10 CFR 71.15) and permits general licenses for limited quantities of fissile material and plutonium-beryllium special form sources (10 CFR 71.22 and 10 CFR 71.23, respectively). These provisions were extensively revised by the NRC as part of a broad rule-making effort in 2004. The exemption and general license provisions are used frequently for a wide-variety of fissile material shipping operations, and consignors must interpret the regulations for particular shipping situations. The purpose of this document is to provide explanatory information on the background, intent, and anticipated use of the provisions in an effort to assist fissile material licensees in their interpretation and application of the provisions such that criticality safety is ensured during transportation activities. A variety of examples are presented and discussed to illustrate how the regulations should be applied.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Realty LimitedPartnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darell E. Zink, Jr., Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | s/    Darell E. Zink, Jr.                                                                              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darell E. Zink, Jr.  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of the  General Partner  November 12, 2003 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Darell E. Zink, Jr., Vice Chairman,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner andwill be retained Mr. Zink and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission upon request.

 

----
January 10, 1991

No. 90-342.

#### DeSmidt *v.*Wisconsin.

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Reactor Oversight Process (NUREG-1649, Revision 6)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1649, Revision 6 (PDF - 4.00 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**July 2016

Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has an established oversight process to inspect, measure, and assess the safety and security performance of commercial nuclear power plants and to respond to any decline in performance. The Reactor Oversight Process focuses inspections on areas of greatest risks, increases regulatory attention to nuclear power plants as performance declines, uses objective measurements of performance, gives the public timely and understandable assessments of plant performance, and provides responses to violations in a predictable and consistent manner that corresponds to the safety significance of the problem.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Technical Basis for Regulatory Guidance on the Alternate Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule, Final Report (NUREG-2163)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2163, Final Report (PDF – 2.92 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2016**Date Published:** September 2018

**Prepared by:** G. Stevens1 M. Kirk M. Modarres2

1 Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.  11515 Vanstory Drive, Suite 125 Huntersville, NC 28078

2 University of Maryland Clark School of Engineering College Park, MD 20742-7531

Mark Kirk, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

During plant operation, the walls of reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) are exposed to neutron radiation, resulting in embrittlement of the vessel steel and weld materials in the area of the RPV adjacent to the core. If an embrittled RPV had a flaw of critical size and if certain severe system transients were to occur, the flaw could rapidly propagate through the vessel, resulting in a through-wall crack that could challenge the integrity of the RPV. The severe transients of concern, known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS), are characterized by a rapid cooling of the internal RPV surface in combination with repressurization of the RPV. Advances in understanding material behavior, the ability to realistically model plant systems and operational characteristics, and the ability to better evaluate PTS transients to estimate loads on vessel walls led the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to develop a risk-informed revision of the existing PTS Rule in Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) 50.61a, "Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events."

This report explains the basis for the requirements that es tablish the entry conditions to permit the use of 10 CFR 50.61a and describes methods that licensees can use to meet the following four requirements:

 (1)     criteria related to the date of construction and design requirements (2)     criteria related to the evaluation of plant-specific surveillance data (3)     criteria related to inservice inspection data and nondestructive examination requirements (4)     criteria related to alternate screening criteria on embrittlement

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                               September 21, 1995



Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, P.A.
Blandford Physicians Center, 5th Flr.
#5 St. Vincent Circle
Little Rock, Arkansas  72205

HeartCare Arkansas, L.L.C.
7 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Little Rock, Arkansas  72211

         Re:      MedCath of Little Rock, L.L.C.

Gentlemen and Ladies:

Each of you, together with MedCath of Arkansas, Inc. ("MedCath"), is a member of
MedCath of Little Rock, L.L.C. (the "Company") and has executed the Company's
Operating Agreement ("Operating Agreement") which is set forth as Exhibit B to
the Company's Private Placement Memorandum. By our mutual execution of this
letter, we agree that Section 5.1(v) of the Operating Agreement is hereby
amended to delete that subsection in its entirety and to substitute in lieu
thereof the following:

                  "(v) Subject to applicable law, in order to assure the
         availability to the Hospital of qualified physicians and to maintain
         the quality of medical services to be provided by the Hospital, the
         execution of professional services agreements with Little Rock
         Cardiology Clinic, P.A., an Arkansas professional corporation ("LRCC")
         and Cardiovascular Consultants of Arkansas, P.A., an Arkansas
         professional corporation ("CCA"), under which the physicians of LRCC
         and CCA shall serve as the exclusive providers of cardiology and
         cardiovascular services, including cardiovascular surgery, to the
         Hospital. Such agreements shall provide that LRCC and CCA may, subject
         to the consent of MedCath which shall not be unreasonably withheld or
         delayed enter into subcontracts with other qualified cardiologists and
         cardiovascular surgeons who will assist LRCC and CCA in fulfilling its
         obligations to the Hospital. Any such subcontract shall be subject to
         and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the professional
         services agreements entered into between LRCC, CCA and the Hospital.
         All physicians of LRCC, CCA and any other physicians who provide such
         services to the Hospital must obtain medical staff membership and
         privileges in accordance with the bylaws and the reasonable rules and
         regulations adopted by the Hospital;"

Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing a copy in
the space provided below and returning it to me.
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Kirk A. Benson
----------------------------
Kirk A. Benson
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2004

/s/ Steven G. Stewart
----------------------------
Steven G. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2004
Table 1. U.S. Biodiesel Production Capacity and Production

(million gallons)

Period

2011

January 2,114 35

February 2,104 40

March 2,081 60

April 2,101 71

May 2,064 77

June 2,069 81

July 1,958 92

August 2,008 95

September 2,087 96

October 2,119 105

November 2,098 105

December 2,090 109

Total -- 967

2012

January 2,140 71

February 2,111 77

March 2,110 92

April 2,122 92

May 2,123 100

June 2,120 91

July 2,090 87

August 2,106 90

September 2,106 81

October 2,121 75

November 2,130 57

December 2,127 57

Total -- 969

2013

January 2,086 66

-- = Not Applicable

R = Revised

Annual Production Capacity

B100 is the industry designation for pure biodiesel; a biodiesel blend contains both pure biodiesel 

and petroleum diesel fuel.

Monthly B100 Production

Totals may not equal the sum of components due to independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production Survey"

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Monthly Biodiesel Production Report
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 24, 2023


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 26 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL BROWN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM A. PERRILL,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 97-1186

(D.C. No. 96-D-2096)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
- 2 -

We hold the district court did not err in dismissing without prejudice appellant’s

habeas corpus petition. We AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its

order adopting the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. The motion to

proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
NUMBER 13-16-00455-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Per Curiam Order

Relator, the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency stay in the above cause on August 17, 2016. Through this original 

proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to vacate an August 4, 2016 order 

requiring relator to produce discovery to the real party in interest, Corina Saenz. Through 

its motion for emergency stay, relator seeks to stay the trial court’s August 4, 2016 order 

pending resolution of this original proceeding. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief, 

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion for emergency relief is 
2

GRANTED and the trial court’s August 4, 2016 order is ordered STAYED pending further 

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) 

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case 

is finally decided.”). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Saenz, or any others whose 

interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for 

writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See

id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this

18th day of August, 2016.
No. 86-775.

#### Marsh Media, Ltd. *v.*Federal Communications Commission et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1986

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020