alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Padley and wife, Respondents, vs. Village of Lodi, Appellant.

*January 18*

February *13, 1940.*

*662For the appellant there was a brief by *Olin & Butler,*and oral argument by *Eldon J. Cassoday*and *Robert M. Rieser,*all of Madison.

- For the respondents there was a brief by *Rogers & Owens*of Portage, and oral argument by *Harlan B. Rogers.*

Fairchild, J.

The trial court submitted the case to the jury on a special verdict inquiring in effect as to whether a safe place of employment existed, and whether the water shutoff box was a nuisance maintained by the village. Judgment was granted on the theory that the safe-place statute applied in this case. The position is untenable. The words “place of employment” carry a definite meaning which leaves no room for plaintiff’s claim, under the circumstances of this case, that she was a frequenter of a place of employment; for, as a matter of fact, she was using the streets- of the *663municipality merely as a traveler. A place of employment originally meant and still does mean a place where active work, either temporary or permanent, is being conducted in connection with a business for profit; where some process or operation related to such industry, trade, or business is carried on; and where any person is directly or indirectly employed by another. Secs. 101.01 (1) and 101.06, Stats. *Waldman v. Young Men’s Christian Asso.*227 Wis. 43, 277 N. W. 632; *Herrick v. Luberts,*230 Wis. 387, 284 N. W. 27.

The surface of the street at the place of the accident was not being used in such a manner as to create a place of employment, nor does the fact that some thirty years ago pipe was laid beneath the surface of the street for the purpose of carrying water into a building, and that a shutoff box was placed so as to rise about one and four-fifths inches above the surrounding surface, constitute the street or the shutoff box a nuisance. The street having been surfaced, and not being a place of employment, actions brought to recover for injuries to travelers due to defects are controlled by sec. 81.15, Stats. It is not contended by respondent that a cause of action now exists under that section, because conditions precedent to a cause of action thereunder have not been met.

The municipality has control of the streets in its governmental capacity. This may be affected by operations actually and actively carried on to the extent that while employees are engaged in such operations the portion of the street used may become a place of employment. Therein lies the distinction between this case and the case of *Badten v. Stevens Point,*209 Wis. 379, 245 N. W. 130. This case is ruled by *Calvert v. Appleton,*196 Wis. 235, 219 N. W. 102, and *Herrick v. Luberts, supra.*

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016060DE.01010101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.3.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 60/101 |

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses (EU) 2015/2394 des Rates vom 8. Dezember 2015 über den von den Mitgliedstaaten im Namen der Europäischen Union einzunehmenden Standpunkt zu den zu verabschiedenden Beschlüssen der Ständigen Kommission von Eurocontrol über die Rollen und Aufgaben von Eurocontrol sowie der zentralen Dienste

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 332 vom 18. Dezember 2015](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2015_332_R_TOC)
)

Seite 138, Anhang, Abschnitt I Nummer 1:

Anstatt:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „(1) | In Artikel 2 Absatz 1 über ‚Funktionen und Dienste‘: | | | | --- | --- | | a) | Verkehrsflussregelung Zentrales Flottenmanagement;“ | |

muss es heißen:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „(1) | In Artikel 2 Absatz 1 über ‚Funktionen und Dienste‘: | | | | --- | --- | | a) | Verkehrsflussregelung Zentrale Verkehrsflusssteuerung;“. | |

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1650

# The United States of America Ninth National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety (NUREG-1650, Revision 8)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1650, Revision 8, August 2022 (PDF - 1.94 MB)
        - Supplement 1, "Answers to Questions From the Peer Review By Contracting Parties on the United States of America Ninth National Report For the Convention on Nuclear Safety," February 2024 (PDF - 1.99 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: August 2022**Date Published**: August 2022

**Prepared by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission prepared Revision 8 to NUREG-1650, “The United States of America Ninth National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety,” for submission for peer review at the joint eighth and ninth review meeting of the Convention on Nuclear Safety, to be convened at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria, in March 2023. This report addresses the safety of land-based commercial nuclear power plants in the United States (U.S.). It demonstrates how the U.S. Government achieves and maintains a high level of nuclear safety worldwide by enhancing national measures and international cooperation and by meeting the obligations of all the articles established by the Convention. These articles address the safety of existing nuclear installations, the legislative and regulatory framework, the regulatory body, responsibility of the licensee, the priority given to safety, financial and human resources, human factors, quality assurance, assessment and verification of safety, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, siting, design and construction, and operation. This report also addresses the principles of the Vienna Declaration adopted by the contracting parties in February 2015.

Similar to the U.S. National Report issued in 2019, this revised document includes a section developed by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations describing work that the U.S. nuclear industry has done to ensure safety. The primary responsibility for the safety of a nuclear installation rests with the license holder; therefore, Part 3 explains how the nuclear industry maintains and improves nuclear safety.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 05, 2024
**EXHIBIT 1.3**

 
|   | FILED # C 14531-0               |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |
|   | JAN 28 2003                     |
|   |                            |
|   | IN THE OFFICE OF                |
|   |                            |
|   | /s/ Dean Heller                 |
|   | DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE |

 

**Certificate of Amendment to Articles ofIncorporation**

**For Nevada Profit Corporations**

 

**(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and *78.390* - After Issuance of Stock)**

 

**- Remit in Duplicate -**

 

1.                                       Nameof corporation: **L-Air Holding, Inc.**

 

2.                                       Thearticles have been amended as follows:

 

**ARTICLE 2**

 

**Capital Stock**

 

Allcertificates representing shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock shall beregistered in the name of the beneficial owner, or in the name of a brokeragefirm, bank, trust company or other custodian that holds such shares for theaccount of a client.  Certificatesrepresenting shares of Common Stock or Preferred may not be registered in the nameof the Depository Trust Company or any other securities clearinghouse thatprovides book entry transaction settlement services for member banks andbroker/dealers.  All transfers of theCorporation’s Common Stock and Preferred Stock shall be made in accordance withthe requirements of “Certificate Only” or “Custody Only” Status.

 

3.                                       Thevote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling themto exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportionof the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes orseries, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles ofincorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 17,742,669

 

4.                                       OfficerSignature:

 

 
| /s/  Alexander GOLDMAN        |   | /s/ Jean  Marie GRAS        |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| President:  Alexander GOLDMAN |   | Secretary:  Jean Marie GRAS |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted) (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), Joseph D. Keegan,
Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Molecular Devices Corporation (the
Company), and Timothy A. Harkness, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.       
     The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
     2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
     Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       
     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
     periods covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
     for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

This
certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Dated: August 13, 2003

| |  |                            
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  | /s/ JOSEPH D. KEEGAN, PH.D.
| |  |                            
| |  | Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.    
| |  | Chief Executive Officer    

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Molecular Devices Corporation and
will be retained by Molecular Devices Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 90-6298.

#### Breeding *v.*Davis, Warden, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 13.1  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  CEO CERTIFICATION  In connection with this amended transition report of Kiska Metals Corp. (the Registrant) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason S. Weber, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   ­­­­/s/ Jason S. Weber  Name: Jason S. Weber Title: Chief Executive Officer November 24, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 15.2



CONSENT OF GIROUX CONSULTANTS LTD.





We hereby consent to the use of the name Giroux Consultants Ltd. and Gary H. Giroux and to references to Giroux Consultants Ltd. and Gary H. Giroux, and to the inclusion of the following technical reports and mineral resource estimates, or the information contained therein, in International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended  May 31, 2008:



- ";October 2008 Summary Report on the Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska,"; dated October 28, 2008;
- ";Summary Report on the Terra Gold Project, McGrath District, Alaska,"; dated August 19, 2008;
- ";Summary Report on the LMS Gold Project, Goodpaster District, Alaska,"; dated August 19, 2008; and
- ";Summary Report on the North Bullfrog Project and Resource at Mayflower, Bullfrog Mining District, Nye County, Nevada,"; dated August 25, 2008.





GIROUX CONSULTANTS LTD.





/s/ Gary Giroux



By:  Gary Giroux

Title: President

Date: December 12, 2008
#### Estate of Sherwin: Burrington, Claimant, Respondent, vs. Sherwin, Executor, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Masters & Hansen*of Sparta.

For the respondent: *W. G. Henke*and *Jens Grothe,*both of Charles City, Iowa, and *0. W. Sprecher*of Sparta.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF

MARGOT ELIZABETH ROBERTS

T O THE BAR OF MARYLAND *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG No. 4

September Term, 20 2 3

ORDER

Upon consideration of Margot Elizabeth Roberts’ petition for reinstatement to the

Bar of Maryland pursuant to Rule 19

- 752 and Bar Counsel’s r esponse to the petition , it is

this 31st day of August 202 3

, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the p etition is granted with a condition. P etitioner Margot

Elizabeth Roberts is reinstated to the Bar of Maryland subject to the condition that,

pursuant to Rule 19

- 752(j)(9), she shall enter into a treatment monitor agreement with Bar

Counsel , which agreement will remain in effect until Bar Counsel recommends its

termination and until further order of this Court ; and it is further

ORDERED that , upon the parties providing proof to the Clerk that Petitioner has

entered into a mental health monitor agreement with Bar Counsel

, the Clerk shall replace

the name Margot Elizabeth Roberts on the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in

Mar yland and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks

of all judicial tribunals in this State.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Ju stice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9920-22-OEI]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document announces the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq*.). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Courtney Kerwin (202) 566-1669, or email at                         *kerwin.courtney@epa.gov*                         and please refer to the appropriate EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.                    

#                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                          ( print page 4915)    

## OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

### OMB Approvals

EPA ICR Number 1363.23; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; 40 CFR part 372; was approved with change on 11/24/2014; OMB Number 2025-0009; expires on 11/30/2017.

EPA ICR Number 1655.09; Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Detergent Gasoline (Renewal); 40 CFR part 80 subpart G; was approved without change on 11/17/2014; OMB Number 2060-0275; expires on 11/30/2017.

EPA ICR Number 2434.23; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery (Renewal); was approved without change on 11/06/2014; OMB Number 2010-0042; expires on 11/30/2017.

EPA ICR Number 0220.12; Clean Water Act Section 404 State-Assumed Programs (Renewal); 40 CFR part 233; 33 CFR part 325; was approved without change on 11/03/2014; OMB Number 2040-0168; expires on 11/30/2017.

### Comment Filed

EPA ICR Number 2449.01; Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications (Proposed Rule); 40 CFR part 131; OMB filed comment on 11/14/2014.

Courtney Kerwin,

Acting Director, Collections Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-01653 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
|Date and Time: October 11, 2005 05:29 PM Pacific Time                                                      |  |                            |  |                              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|BRITISH COLUMBIA                                                                      
Ministry of Finance |  | Mailing Address:           |  | Location:                    
|Corporate and Personal                                                                                     |  | PO BOX 9431 Stn Prov Govt. |  | 2nd Floor - 940 Blanshard St.
|Property Registries                                                                                        |  | Victoria BC V8W 9V3        |  | Victoria BC                  
|www.corporateonline.gov.bc.ca                                                                              |  |                            |  | 250 356-8626                 



|Notice of AlterationFORM 11BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACTSection 257
|---------------------------------------------------------------

|Filed Date and Time:Alteration Date and Time:
|---------------------------------------------

October 11, 2005 05:29 PM Pacific Time

Notice of Articles Altered on October 11, 2005 05:29 PM Pacific Time

|                      |  | NOTICE OF ALTERATION               
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Incorporation Number: |  | Name of Company:                   
|BC0175795             |  | INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD.

ALTERATION EFFECTIVE DATE:

The alteration is to take effect at the time that this application is filed with the Registrar.

PRE-EXISTING COMPANY PROVISIONS

The company has resolved that the Pre-existing Company Provisions no longer apply to this company.

BC0175795 Page: 1 of 1
No. 82-6042.

#### Wade *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Colon, Also Known as Victor Vacquez, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1001]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court erred in permitting the victim to testify that his home had been burglarized on two prior occasions. The error was harmless, however, because of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). Defendant’s remaining contention has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v DeRosa, 137*AD2d 612, *lv denied 71*NY2d 968), and we decline to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2008

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020
### Regulatory Evaluation
DocketNo
. 

# FAA-Z0/?-0082 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2CJl 

## c(- AJ /11

### ~ 

# 2**~3 ~4.[)**  -AD 

### f/\'UII make c/wnges to the l'ahtc\ in the table 

### he/ow
. you Ill/IS/ ensure t!ze totals updare accordingly 

### f l the\' do 1/ul, click rm · J'ah; i11l0 and !hen out o{lf 1e changed cell. Estimated Costs: Cos ts per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, Action propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection , Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet replacement) access, testing , (@$85 /h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Inspection 

### l.O 120 Modification (if 58.0

# ~~1-tV 120 required)



### '

The known number of products in compi iance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $601,800 Costs covered under warranty (if 

### known) $ 

### Special considerations fo•· Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs):

# ~Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-/R-M-8040./C. DOUBLE CLICK tofollow the link 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?- YES* 

# D NO 

### [g] *Exp lanation:

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

# 0 YES* 

## D NO 

## I:8J *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer . 

# G YES 

# D NO 

## I:8J Explanation: 

### lntt·astate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska
. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in A laska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

# G YES* 

## D NO 

## I:8J *Exp lanation: