alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   For the Three Months      For the Nine Months
                                                      Ended March, 31,         Ended March 31,
                                                   --------------------      --------------------
                                                   1998          1997        1998           1997
                                                   ----          ----        ----           ----
<S>                                          <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Basic earnings per common share
        Net income for calculating basic 
        earnings per common share............  $1,526,000      $2,036,000   $5,056,000     $5,027,000
                                               ==========      ==========   ==========     ==========
        Average common shares outstanding       4,486,000       4,192,000    4,229,000      3,144,000
                                               ----------      ----------   ----------     ----------

        Basic earnings per common share             $0.34           $0.49        $1.20          $1.60
                                               ==========      ==========   ==========     ==========

Diluted earnings per common share
        Net income for calculating basic
        earnings per common share...           $1,526,000      $2,036,000   $5 056,000     $5,027,000
                                               ==========      ==========   ==========     ==========

        Average common shares outstanding       4,486,000       4,192,000    4,229,000      3,144,000

        Add exercise of options and warrants      149,000            ----      149,000           ----
                                               ----------      ----------   ----------     ----------

        Diluted common shares outstanding       4,635,000       4,192,000    4,378,000      3,144,000
                                               ==========      ==========   ==========     ==========

        Diluted earnings per common share           $0.33           $0.49        $1.16          $1.60
                                               ==========      ==========   ==========     ==========

</TABLE>




                                       17
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Test and Criteria for Fire Protection of Cable Penetrations (NUREG/CR-2377, SAND81-7160)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2377 (PDF - 2.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 1981**Date Published:**October 1981

**Prepared by:** Robert Brady Williamson, Principal Investigator Fred L. Fisher, Senior Development Engineer Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720  Under Sandia Contract No. 13-7331 

for Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Operated by Sandia Corporation  for the U.S. Department of Energy

L.J. Klamerus, Sandia Project Officer

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Research****U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Under Interagency Agreement DOE 40-550-75

NRC FIN A-1010

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A series of experiments are described which evaluate the effects of test furnace pressure differential and excess pyrolyzates on the fire resistance of cable penetrations installed in fire resistive walls. It is shown that the measured fire resistance of penetrations can be strongly influenced by the pressure difference between the test furnace and the unexposed face of the penetration, and, to a lesser degree, by the presence or absence of excess pyrolyzates. Methods for the local introduction of excess pyrolyzates into a fire test furnace are discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5504-5505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and

[[Page 5505]]

Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Pacific Albacore Logbook.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0223.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Form 88-197.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Average Hours per Response: 1 hour.
    Burden Hours: 4,000.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved collection.
    U.S. fishermen, participating in the Pacific albacore tuna fishery, 
are required to obtain a Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management 
Plan and/or a High-Seas Fishery Compliance Act permit (under the 
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management 
Council and/or the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act). A requirement for 
the permits is to complete and submit logbooks documenting their daily 
fishing activities, including catch and effort for each fishing trip. 
Submissions must be made within 30 days of the completion of a trip. 
The information obtained is used by the agency to assess the status of 
Pacific albacore stocks and to monitor the fishery.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Approximately four times per year.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89c6c0dbc8d6dafcebe4e0fafae0e6e7c9e6e4eba7ece6f9a7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c43455e4d535f796e61657f7f6563624c63616e2269637c226b637a">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01896 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Area-l, Incorporated 

1590 N. Roberts Rd., Suite 102 

Kennesaw, GA 30144 

Tel: (678) 594-5227 

Fax: (678) 594-5228 

09/2112015 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

Federal Aviation Administration 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

ENCLOSURES 

• Publishable summary 

• Petition for exemption 

• PTERA UAS manual 

• PTERA UAS Emergency Procedures 

• 2014-ESA-51-COA 

• Primary flight crew qualifications 

• Area-l, Inc. A VSSMS 

• Letter of approval from Cochran Airport 

• Letter of support from the Center of Innovation for Aerospace 
Area-l, Incorporated 

1590 N. Roberts Rd., Suite 102 

Kennesaw, GA 30144 

Tel: (678) 594-5227 

Fax: (678) 594-5228 

09/2112015 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

Federal Aviation Administration 

West Building Ground Floor, Room wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Petition for exemption from Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) §21, §45.11, 

§91.203(a)(l), §91.203(b), and §91.9 for the operation of the Area-l, Incorporated (Area-l, Inc.) 

SMB Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). 

SUMMARY 

Area-l, Inc. petitions for exemption from specific parts of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These 

exemptions are pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (Report 112-381). In 

observance of Section 3 33, the FAA has authorized limited use of U AS for public interest, which includes testing 

and evaluating UAS. 

Area-l is a Georgia-based company offering a unique combination of analytical and practical experience 

with an emphasis in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). Area-l develops low-cost flight test platforms, UAS 

Guidance and Control (GNC) systems, and highly capable flight computing and data acquisition systems. 

The company maintains a shop and laboratory space that is used for electronics development, hardware-inloop simulation and testing, and has composite fabrication and machining capabilities. 

With the permission of the FAA, Area-l, Inc. requests the opportunity to operate its UAS without the 

burden of reliance on third-party public entity COAs or cost-prohibitive restricted airspace. Area-l, Inc. 

has developed a comprehensive Aviation Safety, Safety Management System (AVSSMS) and Alternative 

Methods of Compliance (AMOC) for any exempt regulations. All PTERA operations under this exemption 

will be conducted at an airport facility with permission from the airport authority in the same fashion as the 

active COA attached.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Alvares, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 668]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered February 17, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, two counts of assault in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and also convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years to life and 5 to 15 years to be served concurrently with two concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years, two concurrent terms of 21⁄3 to 7 years and a consecutive term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant argues that the trial court delivered an improper charge relating to the voluntariness of his confession and that his right to a fair trial was violated by the prosecutor’s cross-examination and comments that he made during summation. *521However, defendant neither raised any objection at trial to the instruction that he now deems unacceptable nor to the prosecutor’s cross-examination and summation, thus rendering unpreserved his current complaints (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Reddick,*199 AD2d 175, *lv denied*83 NY2d 857). Were we to reach these issues in the interest of justice, we would find them to be without merit.

The court’s voluntariness charge was in accordance with New York law, and indeed directly tracked the language of CPL 60.45 (2) (b) (i). The United States Supreme Court has, in *Crane v Kentucky*(476 US 683, 688-689), distinguished between the situation of a Judge making a factual determination as to the voluntariness of a confession and a jury undertaking the same function. The court herein made a pretrial finding that the subject confession was not involuntary, and defendant does not challenge that ruling. In the absence of a constitutional right to have a jury again pass upon such issue, defendant was not deprived of any constitutional right by virtue of the Trial Judge’s instruction.

The prosecutor did not exceed the limits of the court’s *Sandoval*ruling, nor did his summation deprive defendant of a fair trial, particularly in view of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt *(see, People v Brosnan,*32 NY2d 254, 261-262). Concur — Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Synthesis of Distributions Representing Important Non-Site-Specific Parameters in Off-Site Consequence Analyses (NUREG/CR-7161, SAND2010-3380P)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7161 (PDF - 1.98 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2012**Date Published:** April 2013

**Prepared by:** N. E. Bixler, E. Clauss, and C. W. Morrow

Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0734

J. A. Mitchell, C. Navarro, J. Barr, NRC Project Managers

NRC Job Codes N6159, Y6628, and V6227

**Prepared for**: Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The United States and the Commission of European Communities conducted a series of expert elicitations to obtain distributions for uncertain variables used in health consequence analyses related to accidental release of nuclear material. The distributions reflect degrees of belief for non-site-specific parameters that are uncertain and are likely to have significant or moderate influence on the results. The present work presents the effort to develop ranges of values and degrees of belief that fairly represent the divergent opinions of the experts while maintaining the resulting parameters within physical limits. Where necessary, there is a discussion of correlation coefficients that should be included when the uncertainty is used in a calculation. The methodology used a resampling of the experts' values and was based on the assumption of equal weights of the experts' opinions. Various statistical properties of the distributions, the median, the mean, and the mode, are presented so that the user can choose a parameter value when only a point estimate is desired.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0301

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM025AD

767-57A0131 --- 10/30/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# L_2015047EN.01000901.xml

| 20.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/271

of 17 February 2015

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pecorino delle Balze Volterrane’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Vytenis ANDRIUKAITIS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 336, 26.9.2014, p. 23.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Lincoln County Co-operative Shipping Association, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Joseph Lieberman*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEON Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kurt Van Wagenen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2007

/s/ Kurt Van
          WagenenKurt Van WagenenChief Executive
          Officer


---
No: 19-053 October 28, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Environmental Impact Statement

for Surry Subsequent License Renewal

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff would like to hear the public’s views on the agency’s 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement regarding Dominion Energy Virginia’s application for an 

additional 20 years of operation for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2. The NRC is interested in 

comments regarding the statement’s draft conclusion: environmental impacts are not great enough to 

prevent the agency from issuing the renewed licenses.

NRC staff will continue to consider written comments concerning the draft EIS until Dec. 10, 

following the publication of a notice in the Federal Register. Include Docket ID NRC-2018-0280 with 

the comment, via the regulations.gov website. The staff will hold a webinar on the draft EIS in 

November, including a presentation on the preliminary findings and a transcribed public comment 

session. The webinar details will be announced soon. 

Dominion submitted the subsequent license renewal application on Oct. 15, 2018, for the Surry 

reactors, located approximately 17 miles northwest of Newport News. The subsequent license renewal 

process determines whether an operating reactor can extend its license for an additional 20 years (initial 

license renewals add 20 years to a reactor’s original 40-year license). The application, less proprietary 

details, is available on the NRC website. In addition, a copy of the draft EIS is available for public 

inspection at the Williamsburg Library, at 515 Scotland St., in Williamsburg, Va.
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **
** **

| Date:                October 28, 2008 | /s/                Steven C. Straus                                          |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Steven                C. Straus                                              |
|                                  | Chief                Executive Officer                                       |
|                                  |                                                                         |
|                                  |                                                                         |
| Date:                October 28, 2008 | /s/                Michael J. Celebrezze                                     |
|                                  | Michael                J. Celebrezze                                         |
|                                  | Interim                Chief Financial Officer                               |
|                                  | Senior                Vice President of Finance and                Treasurer |

----
MK

EPA base m8 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 43 15 44 11 51 24 46 1739% Hercules-Glades 19 8 29 5 19 9 22 739% Upper Buffalo 31 15 28 15 42 14 34 1526% Wichita Mountains 24 10 23 9 30 17 26 1223%

LNB 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 25 4 21 6 38 11 28 7 Hercules-Glades 13 4 16 4 12 6 14 5 Upper Buffalo 25 9 19 6 31 9 25 8 Wichita Mountains 18 5 18 8 23 8 20 7

DFGD 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 1 0 1 0 6 1 3 0 Hercules-Glades 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Upper Buffalo 3 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 Wichita Mountains 1 0 3 0 2 0 2 0

SO EPA base 1ppb m8 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 15 4 13 2 13 3 14 363% Hercules-Glades 12 4 6 1 9 0 9 267% Upper Buffalo 15 4 7 1 11 1 11 255% Wichita Mountains 34 17 38 1443 23 38 1836%

LNB 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 2001 2002 2003 average 2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average 2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 averageCaney Creek 8 1 2 1 5 2 5 1

Hercules-Glades 5 1 2 0 2 0 3 0 Upper Buffalo 7 2 4 0 4 1 5 1 Wichita Mountains 22 9 22 7 30 13 25 10

DFGD 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hercules-Glades 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Upper Buffalo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wichita Mountains 4 0 1 0 5 2 3 1

NE EPA base 1ppb m8 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 29 11 31 8 31 11 30 1045% Hercules-Glades 23 7 12 5 17 7 17 638% Upper Buffalo 26 11 17 4 21 8 21 845% Wichita Mountains 20 10 17 5 34 17 24 1132%

LNB 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 18 7 16 5 16 7 17 6 Hercules-Glades 13 5 7 2 12 5 11 4 Upper Buffalo 15 5 6 1 14 6 12 4 Wichita Mountains 14 5 9 1 25 14 16 7

DFGD 0.5 10.5 10.5 1 >0.5>1 Caney Creek 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Hercules-Glades 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Upper Buffalo 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2001 2002 2003 average 2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average 2001 2002 2003 averageWichita Mountains 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 058%

36% 45% 42%

56% 80% 50% 46%37%

37% 48% 38%
Motion Granted in Part and Denied in Part and Order filed December 29, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 01031

- CV

____________ HEATHER TENINI KUENTZ, INDIVIDUALLY , AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF ROBERT M ICHAEL KUENTZ, DECEASED, AND AS NEX T FRIEND OF XXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXX, A MINOR, LARRY MICHA EL "ROBERT" KUENTZ E T AL , Appellant s
V.
THE COLE GROUP, INC. , MAC HAIK CHEVROLET , LTD., MAC HAIK CHEVROLET LTD. D/B/A MAC HAIK CHEVROLET A ND MAC HAIK CHEVROLET , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 45172



### ORDER
Appellants’ motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief is granted to January 21, 2017 . Appellants’ request to postpone submission is denied

. PER CURIAM