alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          65,099                  65,099
<SECURITIES>                                    29,730                  29,730
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,053                   1,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,240                   1,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,974                  97,974
<PP&E>                                          29,810                  29,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,904)                (18,904)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,596                 116,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,428                   7,428
<BONDS>                                        302,961                 302,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         22                      22
<COMMON>                                            18                      18
<OTHER-SE>                                   (202,323)               (202,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,596                 116,596
<SALES>                                            584                   1,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   584                   1,699
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,521                  57,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,903                  28,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,391)                (80,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,391)                (80,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,391)                (80,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.95)                  (4.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 11.2

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          HELPMATE ROBOTICS INC.

                                                              CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                                                       --------------------------------------------------------




                                                        Nine Months    Nine Months   Three Months  Three Months
                                                           Ended          Ended         Ended         Ended
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS PER SHARE                          09/30/96       09/30/95       09/30/96      09/30/95
                                                       ------------   ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Historical                              

Net Loss Applicable  to Shareholders                   $(2,808,238)   $(1,928,781)   $(1,167,810)  $(571,309)
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding               5,827,168      1,583,853      6,335,205    1,586,729
                                  
Incremental Shares Issuable Pursuant to SAB Topic 4D        38,553         38,553         38,553       38,553
                                  
Shares Applicable to Convertible                                
     Preferred Stock                                       178,268      1,476,461              -    1,505,770
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
                                  
Total Shares                                             6,043,989      3,098,867      6,373,758    3,131,052
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
                                  
Historical Net Loss Per Common Share                         $(.46)         $(.62)         $(.18)       $(.18)
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
                                                       -----------    -----------    -----------   ----------
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NICHOLAS COLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RADAMES GONCE, SLOANE PORTO,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-1601

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Connecticut in No. 3:19-cv-00978-OAW, Judge 

Omar A. Williams.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a civil action asserting claims 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of Nicholas 

Cole’s constitutional rights. Radames Gonce and Sloane 

Porto move with consent to transfer the appeal to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, stating that Mr. Cole filed his appeal with this court in error. 

We agree that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, see 28 

Case: 23-1601 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 04/24/2023
2 COLE v. GONCE

U.S.C. § 1295, and that it would be in the interest of justice 

to transfer the appeal to the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1631. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to transfer is granted. Pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1631, this case and all transmittals are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second

Circuit.

April 24, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1601 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/24/2023
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 25, 2022


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (X Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**

**No content for this letter**

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 28, 2020
#### Dershowitz & Eiger, P. C., Appellant-Respondent, v Leona Helmsley, Respondent-Appellant. Leona Helmsley, Respondent-Appellant, v Dershowitz & Eiger, P. C., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 318]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1995, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for an account stated and to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims and which denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment on its counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff is not entitled to summary judgment on an account stated to recover legal fees. In this case, there was a timely objection to the invoices sued on sufficient to raise issues of fact to require a trial to determine the reasonableness of the fees billed defendant client (*see, Dreyer & Traub v Rubinstein,*191 AD2d 236). We also find the counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty raises questions of credibility which are not susceptible to summary disposition. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
# Equity through Collaboration with Partners

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About NRCS 
-  Priorities 
-  Equity 
-  Equity through Collaboration with Partners 

Collaboration with internal and external partners, stakeholders, and various communities is paramount to the success of advancing equity and removing inequities in NRCS programs, policies, and services.

Collaboration with internal and external partners, stakeholders, and various communities is paramount to the success of advancing equity and removing inequities in NRCS programs, policies, and services. Transformation requires that the people experiencing problems are at the center of determining the solutions to inequities, rather than experts deciding for them. Local, boots on the ground, regional, and national equity work is prudent, but it requires partnership, association, alliance, and cooperation with communities to achieve equity.

Equitable collaboration with underserved communities is critical to ensuring efforts for change are informed by the lived experiences of individuals and communities those efforts seek to benefit. NRCS will pursue equity as all levels of the agency will be committed to working in partnership with communities, partners, stakeholders, and other institutions.

Types of partners include, but are not limited to:
              - Conservation Districts
              - Local communities
              - Community Based Organizations
              - Federal, State, and Local agencies
              - Tribal entities
              - NRCS Earth Team volunteers
              - Agricultural and environmental groups
              - State Technical Committees
              - Professional societies
              - Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) Councils
              - Colleges and Universities
              - Conservation organizations
              - Agribusiness
              - Sportsperson Groups
              - Technical Service Providers

##   Related Content

### Partner With Us

Conserving our natural resources is not a one-person job. NRCS succeeds through its partnerships, working closely with individual farmers and ranchers, landowners, local conservation districts, government agencies, Tribes, Earth Team volunteers and many other people and groups.

Outreach and Partnerships
Outreach is an integral part of NRCS program and service delivery. Effective outreach helps to ensure that information services and programs reaches all existing and potential customers in a timely and fair manner.
Page **1** of **1**

MEMORANDUM TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2015
- 0091 FROM: EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality DATE: April 1 4 , 2015 SUBJECT: Meeting with the National Biodiesel Board On April 13, 2015, EPA met with staff of the National Biodiesel Board (NBB), upon their request, to discuss the potential steps in the process, pending public comments, that biodiesel producers could follow to submit a new pathway petition to EPA requesting qualification to generate renewable identification numbers (RINs) for fuel produced from pennycress oil. **NBB Staff:** 1. Lindsay

Fitzgerald, Director of Regulatory Affairs 2. Larry Schafer, Senior Government Affairs Consultant **EPA Participants:** 1. Shary n Lie, Office of Air and Radiation ( OAR) 2. Aaron Levy, OAR 3. Jon Monger, OAR
EXHIBIT 8.1  SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES OF KISKA METALS CORPORATION  All subsidiary corporations are engaged in the business of mineral property exploration and development.  2012860 Ontario Limited Incorporated by the Corporation on June 19, 2002 in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The Corporation holds 100% ownership.  Geoinformatics Alaska Exploration, Inc. Incorporated by the Corporation on April 8, 2003 in the State of Alaska, United States of America. The Corporation holds 100% ownership through wholly-owned subsidiaries, 2012860 Ontario Limited and Geoinformatics Explorations Ireland Limited.  Geoinformatics Exploration Australia Pty Ltd Incorporated June 25, 1987 in the State of Western Australia, Australia. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in 2002.  Geoinformatics Exploration Canada LimitedIncorporated by the Corporation on May 5, 2005 as a federal corporation in Canada, domiciled in Ontario. The Corporation holds 100% ownership.  Geoinformatics Explorations Ireland Limited Incorporated November 3, 1999 in Dublin Ireland. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in 2002, through wholly-owned subsidiary, 2012860 Ontario Limited.  GXL USA, Inc.Incorporated by the Corporation on August 14, 2007 in the State of Delaware, United States of America. The Corporation holds 100% ownership.  Minera Geoinformatica S.A de C.V. Incorporated by the Corporation on July 13, 2004 in the State of Sonora, Mexico. The Corporation holds 100% ownership through wholly-owned subsidiary, 2012860 Ontario Limited.  Rimfire Alaska, Ltd. Incorporated August 19, 1998 in the State of Alaska, United States of America. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in2009 through the wholly-owned subsidiary, Rimfire Minerals Corporation.  Rimfire Australia Pty Ltd. Incorporated August 23, 2006 in the State of Victoria, Australia. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in2009 through the wholly-owned subsidiary Rimfire Minerals Corporation.  Rimfire Minerals Corporation Incorporated May 7, 1991 in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in2009.  Rimfire Nevada Ltd. Incorporated January 4, 2005 in the State of Nevada, United States of America. 100% ownership was acquired by the Corporation in2009 through the wholly-owned subsidiary, Rimfire Minerals Corporation.  INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS   [ex81001.jpg]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10KSB of Prevention Insurance.com for the
fiscal year end April 30, 2003, I, Scott Goldsmith, President of Prevention
Insurance.com, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss1350 as adopted pursuant
to ss906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge believe
that:

(1)      Such form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, fully
         complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in such Form 10KSB for the year end April 30,
         2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of Prevention Insurance.com.

                            Prevention Insurance.com

                             By: /s/ Scott Goldsmith
                                 -------------------
                                 Scott Goldsmith
                                 President
2/25/2015 Production Menu

http://wogcc.state.wy.us/grouptrpMenu.cfm 1/1

Wyoming Oil and Gas

Conservation Commission

Download Production

Production By Well Production By Group No.

Production From Uploaded File Track Production By Well

Twp & Rge ( Displays Production ) State Stats and Graphs

Download by County and Year (*.xls)

No Warranty is made by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for the

use of this data.Any use of this information to any specific application should be

based on independent examination and verification. Those making use of, or relying

on, this information assume all risks and liability arising from such use or reliance
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.1 for Gravity-Driven Injection Experiment in the Core Makeup Tank of the CARR Passive Reactor (CP-1300) (NUREG/IA-0134, CAMP005)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0134 (PDF 6.40 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** October 1996

**Prepared by:** Sang Il Lee, Hee Cheon No, KAIST Young Seok Bang, Hho Jung Kim, KINS

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Nuclear Engineering Department 373–1, Gusung-Dong Yusung, Taejon 305-701 Korea

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety Advanced Reactor Dept. P.O. Box 114 Yusung, Taejon 305–600 Korea

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objective of the present work is to improve the analysis capability of RELAP5/MOD3.1 on the direct contact condensation in the core makeup tank(CMT) of passive high-pressure injection system(PHPIS) in the CARR Passvie Reactor(CP-1300). The gravity-driven injection experiment is conducted by using a small scale test facility to identify the parameters having significant effects on the gravity-driven injection and the major condensation modes. It turns out that the larger the water subcooling is, the more the initiation of injection is delayed, and the sparger and the natural circulation of the hot water from the steam generator accelerate the gravity-driven injection. The condensation modes are divided into three modes: sonic jet, subsonic jet, and steam cavity. RELAP5/MOD3.1 is chosen to evaluate the code predictability on the direct contact condensation in the CMT. It is found that the predictions of MOD3.1 are in better agreement with the experimental data than those of MOD3.0. From the nodalization study of the test section, the 1- node model shows better agreement with the experimental data than the multi- node models. RELAP5/MOD3.1 identifies the flow regime of the test section as vertical stratification. However, the flow regime observed in the experiment is the subsonic jet with the bubble having the vertical cone shape. To accurately predict the direct contact condensation in the CMT with RELAP5/MOD3.1, it is essential that a new set of the interfacial heat transfer coefficients and a new flow regime map for direct contact condensation in the CMT be developed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES JUNE 30, 2000
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIREITY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,253)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,768
<PP&E>                                       5,611,007
<DEPRECIATION>                               (308,841)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,731,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,690
<BONDS>                                      2,349,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,117,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,731,304
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.74


</TABLE>