alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsPetition  for Rulemaking Dockets

# Petition for Rulemaking Dockets for 2006

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Open Petition for Rulemaking Dockets
          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 24, 2022
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Matthew A. Cohoat, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/ Matthew A.  Cohoat              |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Matthew A.  Cohoat                  |
|   | Executive Vice  President and       |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer            |
|   |   of  the General Partner |
|   | Date:  August 15, 2005         |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, andwill be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Recommendations for Resolution of Public Comments on USI A-40, “Seismic Design Criteria” (NUREG/CR-5347)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5347 (PDF - 5.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 1989**Date Published:** May 1989

**Prepared by:** A.J. Philippacopoulos

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

NRC Job Code A3981

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In June 1988 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued for public comment the proposed Revision 2 of the Standard Review Plan (SRP) Sections 2.5.2, 3.7.1, 3.7.2 and 3.7.3. Comments were received from six organizations. Brookhaven National laboratory (BNL) was requested by NRC to provide expert consultation in the seismic and soil-structure interaction areas for the review and resolution of these comments. For this purpose, a panel of consultants was established to assist BNL with the review and evaluation of the public cowments. This review was carried out during the period of October 1988 through January 1989. Many of the suggestions given in the public comments were found to be significant and a number of modifications to appropriate SRP sections are recommended. Other public comments were found to have no impact on the proposed Revision 2 of the SRP. Major changes are recommended to the SRP sections dealing with a) Power Spectral Density (PSD) and ground motion requirements and b) soil-structure interaction requirements. This report contains specific recommendations to NRC for resolution of the public comments made on the proposed Revision 2 of the SRP.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit 15**

 

 

The Partners

Duke Realty Limited Partnership

 

 

Gentlemen:

 

RE: Registration Statements Nos. 333-37920-01

 

With respect to the subject registrationstatements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report datedJuly 31, 2002 related to our review of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, such report is not considered a part of a registration statementprepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by anaccountant within the meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

 

KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

August 14, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Susan KAISER, Appellant, v. Edna MAHAN, as Superintendent of the New Jersey Reformatory for Women. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Harry J. KAISER, Appellant, v. Howard YEAGER, The Principal Keeper of the State Prison, Trenton, New Jersey.

Nos. 15154, 15155.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 17, 1965.

John J. Corcoran, Jr., Jersey City, N. J., for appellants.

Ronald J. Picinich, Asst. Prosecutor, Bergen County, Hackensack, N. J. (Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error.

The Order of the District Court entered September 28, 1964 will be affirmed, D.C., 233 F.Supp. 1.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Registrant Report
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Donald C. ParkersonDonald C. ParkersonChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 15

 

To the Partners

Duke Realty Limited Partnership

 

Gentlemen:

 

RE: Registration Statements Nos. 333-37920

 

With respect to the subject registrationstatements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report datedOctober 31, 2001 related to our review of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, such report is not considered a part of a registration statementprepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by anaccountant within the meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

November 9, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      30,527,000
<SECURITIES>                                   600,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,541,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 98,982,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           133,650,000
<PP&E>                                       2,756,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,022,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             135,384,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      103,382,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,996,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               135,384,000
<SALES>                                     15,411,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,411,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,037,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,295,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,079,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,628,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,451,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 (NUREG-1936)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
### NU M BER 13- 10- 0004 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ IG NACIO CISNERO S, A PPE LLA NT,
v . M A RT H A

IMEL D A

C IS N ER OS , A PP EL L EE .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On A pp eal from th e 1 97t h Dist rict C ou rt of C amero n Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Ben av i des and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am Appel lan t, Ig naci o C is neros, att empted t o per fect an appea l from a j udg ment entered by

the 197th Di str ict C our t of C amero n C ounty , Texas, i n c a u se number 2006- 12- 5712- C. J udg ment i n thiscause was si g ned on September 9, 2009. N o moti on2

for new trial was f iled. Pursua nt to Te xas Rule o f A ppe llate Proce dure 26.1 , app ellant ’s noti ce of appeal was due on Oct ober 9, 2009, but was not fil ed unt il Ja nuar y 20, 2010. On F ebr uar

y 10, 2010, the C ler k o f thi s Cour t notifie d appell ant of thi s defect s o tha t ste ps coul d be tak en toco rrectthe defect, if i t c oul d be done. Appel lan t was adv is ed th at, if t he defect was no t corrected w ithin te n da ys f rom th e da te of receipt of

this Court’s letter, the a ppeal woul d be dis mis sed. To date , no re spons e has been re cei v ed f ro m appel lan t. Th e Court, h aving ex am ined and f ully conside red the docu me nts on f ile, app ellant ’s failu re to ti mely

per fect hi s a ppeal , and app ell ant’ s fai lure to re spond to thi s C our t’ s n oti ce, is o f t h e o p in io n t h a tt h e a p p e a l s h o u ld b e d is m is s e d fo r wa n to f ju ri s d ic t io n . A c c o rd in gl y, the a ppeal i s h ereby

DISM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF JU RI SD IC TION

. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 3(a)(c).

PERC UR IAM Del ivered and filed the 18th day of Ma rc h, 20 10.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,081,137               3,081,137
<SECURITIES>                                17,085,472              17,085,472
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,527,607              14,527,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,648,404               4,648,404
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,323,593              32,323,593
<PP&E>                                       6,293,877               6,293,877
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,227,407               2,227,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,787,356              38,787,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,826,057               1,826,057
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        27,026                  27,026
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,523,312              35,523,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,787,356              38,787,356
<SALES>                                      9,285,139              17,130,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,285,139              17,130,125
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,942,838              14,957,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,492                 144,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,541,147               2,555,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                   673,424               1,124,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            867,723               1,431,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   867,723               1,431,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15                    0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15                    0.25
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffReport to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences (NUREG-0090)

# Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences – Fiscal Year 2019 (NUREG-0090, Volume 42)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0090, Volume 42 (PDF – 972.61 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2020**Date Published:** June 2020

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchUnited States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (Public Law 93–438), defines an abnormal occurrence (AO) as an unscheduled incident or event that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) determines to be significant from the standpoint of public health or safety. The Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–66) changed the AO reporting frequency from quarterly to annually.

This report describes nine events in Agreement States and no events involving NRC licensees that were identified as AOs during fiscal year (FY) 2019. These events are based on the criteria defined in the NRC Policy Statement on "Abnormal Occurrence Reports," issued on October 2, 2017 (82 FR 45907). Seven AOs were medical events as defined in Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 35, "Medical Use of Byproduct Material." The eighth AO was a human exposure event and the ninth AO involved the theft and recovery of Category 2 sources, as defined in 10 CFR Part 37, "Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material." The NRC did not identify any events at commercial nuclear power plants as AOs.

Agreement States are those States that have entered into formal agreements with the NRC, in accordance with Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA) (Public Law 83–703), to regulate certain quantities of AEA material at facilities within the States' borders. Currently, there are 39 Agreement States.

Appendix A, "Abnormal Occurrence Criteria," to this report presents the NRC's criteria for identifying AOs. The NRC identified one event during FY 2019 that meets the guidelines for inclusion in Appendix B, "Other Events of Interest." The event received significant media coverage due to extensive contamination of personnel and building structures due to the breaching of a sealed cesium-137 source. No events meet the guidelines for inclusion in Appendix C, "Updates of Previously Reported Abnormal Occurrences." Appendix D, "Glossary," defines terms used throughout this report. Appendix E, "Conversion Table," presents conversions commonly used when calculating doses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT COREY A. McDOWELL BEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4764 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed July 27, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Corey A. McDowell Bey, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 27, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 27, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0492. UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. d/b/a SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV300256
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 (NUREG-1782)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1782 (PDF - 34.20 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2003**Date Published:**October 2003

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 (FCS), license renewal application (LRA) by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (staff). By letters dated January 9 and April 5, 2002, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD or the applicant) submitted the LRA for FCS in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 (10 CFR Part 54 or the Rule). OPPD is requesting renewal of the operating license for Unit 1 (license numbers DPR-40) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration of midnight, August 9, 2013.

 The FCS site is located in Washington County, NE, on the west bank of the Missouri River, approximately 19 miles north of Omaha, NE. The construction permit was issued by NRC on June 7, 1968, and the operating license was issued August 9, 1973. The unit consists of a Combustion Engineering (CE) pressurized-water reactor (PWR) nuclear steam supply system designed to generate 1500 MW-thermal, or approximately 475 MW-electric.

 This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted to the NRC through August 7, 2003. In its SER issued on April 21, 2003, the staff identified open and confirmatory items that had to be resolved before the staff could make a final determination on the application. These items and their resolutions are summarized in Sections 1.5 and 1.6 of this report. The staff's final conclusion of its review of the FCS LRA can be found in Section 6 of this SER.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021