Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 4541 

14See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment in NME 

Antidumping Proceedings). 

15For an explanation on the derivation of the 

PRC-wide rate, see Notice of Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China, 

70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 37289 

(July 1, 2014). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice). 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

non-market economy (NME) cases. 

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of 

this practice, see Assessment in NME 

Antidumping Proceedings.14

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act): (1) For the exporter’s 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, a zero cash 

deposit rate will be required for that 

company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing producer/

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 285.63 

percent; 15 and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed regarding these final results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in this 

proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and that subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 21, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Selection of Surrogate Country 

Comment 2: Surrogate Value Selection 

A. Chlorine 

B. Hydrogen 

C. Financial Ratios 

Comment 3: Whether the Department Is 

Authorized by Law To Apply the 

Alternative Methodology Under Section 

777A(d)(1)(B) of the Act to Annual 

Reviews 

Comment 4: Methodological Issues 

A. Value-Added Tax (VAT) Adjustment for 

Kangtai’s and Jiheng’s U.S. Sales 

B. Downstream By-Product Offset for 

Ammonium Sulfate 

C. Recalculating Jiheng’s Hydrogen ByProduct Offset 

D. Calculation of Jiheng’s Electricity Rates 

Comment 5: Ministerial Errors 

A. Double-Counting of Chlorine Input 

B. Calculation of Jiheng’s Market Economy 

Brokerage and Handling Charges 

C. Double-Counting of Jiheng’s Market 

Economy Brokerage and Handling 

Charges in Both Domestic and 

International Movement Expenses 

[FR Doc. 2015–01604 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Hargett or George McMahon 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4161 or (202) 482–1167, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2014, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain pasta 

from Italy.1 Pursuant to requests from 

interested parties, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of initiation of this antidumping 

duty administrative review with respect 

to the following companies for the 

period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014: Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. 

(Andalini), Dalla Costa Alimentare SRL. 

(Dalla Costa), Delverde Industrie 

Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde), La 

Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana), Rummo, 

S.p.A. (Rummo), and Pasta Lensi S.r.L. 

(Pasta Lensi).2 On October 10, 2014, and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

4542 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 

3See Letter from Dalla Costa to the Department, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Ce1tain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Review 

Request for Administrative Review of Dalla Costa 

Alimentare SRL,’’ dated October 10, 2014; Letter 

from Pasta Lensi to the Department, ‘‘Pasta from 

Italy: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 25, 2014. 

4See Initiation Notice. 

1See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 

2012–2013 (July 25, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’) 

and accompanying Decision Memorandum. 

2See Sixth Administrative Review of Polyester 

Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of China— 

Preliminary Results Clerical Error Allegation, dated 

July 23, 2014. The Department notes that ‘‘Polyester 

Staple Fiberfill’’ is a misidentification of the 

proceeding. The Department has corrected this 

reference throughout this document to the name: 

‘‘Polyester Staple Fiber.’’ 

3See Preliminary Results. 

4See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. 

Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, from Steven 

Hampton, International Trade Compliance Analyst, 

Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations regarding Certain Polyester Staple Fiber 

from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, dated October 30, 2014. 

5See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

regarding Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the 

People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2012– 

2013 Administrative Review issued concurrently 

with this notice for a complete description of the 

Scope of the Order (‘‘I&D Memo’’). 

November 25, 2014, respectively, Dalla 

Costa and Pasta Lensi timely withdrew 

their respective requests for a review.3

Partial Rescission of the 2013–2014 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the parties 

that requested a review withdraw the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. The Department 

initiated the instant review on August 

29, 2014.4 Dalla Costa and Pasta Lensi 

withdrew their requests for a review on 

October 10, 2014 and November 25, 

2014, respectively, which is within the 

90-day deadline. No other party 

requested an administrative review of 

these particular companies. Therefore, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain pasta from Italy, in part, with 

respect to Dalla Costa and Pasta Lensi. 

The instant review will continue with 

respect to Andalini, Delverde, La 

Molisana, and Rummo. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the companies 

for which this review is rescinded, Dalla 

Costa and Pasta Lensi, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, during the period July 

1, 2013, through June 30, 2014, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in the amount of 

antidumping duties assessed. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01586 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–905] 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 25, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the 

Federal Register the Preliminary Results 

of the sixth administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

polyester staple fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1

We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Based upon our 

analysis of the comments and 

information received, we made changes 

to the margin calculations for the final 

results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0116. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 23, 2014, DAK Americas LLC 

(‘‘Petitioner’’) filed comments regarding 

ministerial errors.2 On July 25, 2014, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results.3 On October 21, 2014, 

Petitioner and Takayasu Industrial 

(Jiangyin) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Takayasu’’) 

submitted case briefs. On October 28, 

2014, Petitioner and Takayasu 

submitted rebuttal briefs. On October 

30, 2014, the Department fully extended 

the final results to January 21, 2015.4 On 

November 5, 2014, Takayasu submitted 

a redacted rebuttal brief per the 

Department’s request. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain polyester staple fiber. The 

product is currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) numbers 

5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order, which is contained 

in the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum (‘‘I&D Memo’’) 

is dispositive.5

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES