alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Falcone, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 1, 2006



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael L. Falcone                         
|Michael L. Falcone                             
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Technical Review of Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Methods for Nuclear Power Plant Fire Protection Analyses - Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-1521)

This NUREG-series publication was issued for public comment, and the comment period is now closed.

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1521 - Draft Report for Comment (PDF - 12.9 MB)

For information about how the NRC handles your comments, see our Privacy Policy.

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1998**Date Published:**July 1998

**Prepared by:** M. Dey,  M.A. Azarm,* R. Travis,* G. Martinez-Guridi* R. Levine**

*Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

**Formerly with Building and Fire Research Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has instituted an initiative for regulatory improvement to focus licensee and NRC resources on risksignificant activities, and to decrease the prescriptiveness of its regulations through performance-based methods that allow licensees increased flexibility in implementing NRC regulations. The NRC has identified risk-informed methods utilizing insights from probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) as a major tool for achievirig its goal for regulatory focus. The issue of fire protection requirements has been identified as a regulatory area in which NRC will pursue regulatory improvement. This report presents a technical review and analysis of risk-informed, performance-based methods that are alternatives to those in current prescriptive fire protection requirements or guidance that could allow costeffective methods for implementing safety objectives, focusing licensee efforts, and achieving greater efficiency in the use of resources for plant safety. A technical analysis of the usefulness of the results and insights derived from these methods (including accounting for the uncertainties in the results) in improving regulatory decisionmaking is presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         411,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  316,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,028,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,034,716
<PP&E>                                       3,343,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                (877,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,500,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,438
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,142,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,500,540
<SALES>                                        482,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               482,530
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,253,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (26,452)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (796,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (796,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 3, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00891

- CV

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; Bryan W. Shaw, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Texas Commission on Envir onmental Quality; Buddy Garcia and Carlos Rubinstein, in their official capacity as Commissioners of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; Les Trobman in his official capacity as General Counsel for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; a nd TexCom Gulf Disposal, LLC, Appellants

v.

Denbury Onshore, LLC; Montgomery County; City of Conroe; Nicky E. Dyer;
Flora Harrell; Edgar Hoagland; Shirley Hoagland; James A. Langston, III; James Langston; Lois Nelson; Brian Rodel; Richard Ward; Edward A. (Art) Wilson; and

Bank of America, N.A., Trustee for Sabine Royalty Trust, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN REVERSED AND DISMISSED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on December 13, 2011.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible

error in the court’s interlocutory order

. Therefore, the Court reve rses the trial court’s

interlocutory order and dismisses the claims brought by appellee Bank of America, N.A., Trustee

for Sabine Royalty Trust (“Sabine”) and the claims brought by the other appellees based upon an

alleged lack of pro per notice to Sabine of the administrative proceeding. The appellee s shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1093 CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. JOHN J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, HARRY I. MOATZ, Director of Office of Enrollment and Discipline, and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case no. 07- CV-1719, Judge Richard W. Roberts. Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish submits a brief in reply to the court's April 21, 2009 order. The court considers whether Cornish's submission should be treated as his reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Cornish's May 5, 2009 submission is treated as a reply brief.(2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to

decide this case. FOR THE COURT

MAY 18 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# ustilaartor
cc: Cornell D.M. Cornish Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s17 MAY 1 8 2009
CLERK
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6657

LARRY GENE MARTIN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TIM RILEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief

District Judge. (4:11-cv-00473-MBS)

Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Gene Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Gene Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of  Electronic  Media
Central  Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 9, 2005
                                                          /s/ George Morris
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George Morris
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael A.
Cederstrom, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to ss.. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.. 1350),
that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Cederstrom
-----------------------------
Michael A. Cederstrom
Chief Financial Officer
March 21, 2007

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TX Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufact urer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISC U SS E D 

### Boeing Evans, Maynard J 8/18/2014 Con c u r. 

### I I I I I

Other /Additional Information :



### 10
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2011

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2010

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020
No. 91-729.

#### Garziano et al. *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TOBY LYNN BISHOP, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. SHERYL FOSTER, Respondent - Appellee. No. 09-15627D.C. No. CV 05-00908-RLHGWF
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 8, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Toby Lynn Bishop appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his habeas petition as untimely. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. 1. Reviewing de novo, Zepeda v. Walker , 581 F.3d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir. 2009), we hold that Petitioner is not entitled to statutory tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). "Because the state court re jected petitioner’s [state post-conviction] 

# FILED
MAR 17 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 petition as untimely, it was not ‘properly f iled,’ and he is not entitled to statutory tolling under § 2244(d)(2)." Pace v. DiGuglielmo , 544 U.S. 408, 417 (2005); see also Townsend v. Knowles , 562 F.3d 1200, 1205 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied , 130 S. Ct. 193 (2009). Petitioner argues that he is not subject to that rule because the Nevada Supreme Court applied a new ru le. But "whether a condition to filing is firmly established and regularly followe d is irrelevant. Instead, where a state court rejects a petition for failure to comply with conditions of filing, that is the end of the matter." Zepeda , 581 F.3d at 1018 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioner’s motion to amend or alter the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Dixon v. Wallowa County , 336 F.3d 1013, 1022 (9th Cir. 2003) ("We review a district court's decision on a Rule 59(e) motion to amend a judgment for abuse of discretion."). Petitioner did not ra ise the issue of equitable tolling, on any ground, until after judgment in the Rule 59(e) motion. Additionally, before the Nevada Supreme Court, Petitioner did not ar gue that he had relied on an allegedly superseded prison-mailbox rule. 3. During oral argument, Petitioner’s lawyer urged that Petitioner is entitled to relief as a matter of "equal protecti on." To the extent that this assertion3 constituted a separate argument, we do not address arguments raised for the first time during oral argument. Butler v. Curry , 528 F.3d 624, 642 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , 129 S. Ct. 767 (2008). AFFIRMED
.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9014]


Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sword Pommel''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Sword Pommel,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New 
York, New York, from on or about February 1, 2015, until on or about 
February 1, 2020, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the imported object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-01449 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2011 |  | /s/ David L. Thomas                                                    
|                     |  | David L. Thomas                                                        
|                     |  | Chief Operating Officer                                                
|                     | 
|Date: April 26, 2011 |  | /s/ Michael J. Celebrezze                                              
|                     |  | Michael J. Celebrezze                                                  
|                     |  | Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Software Quality Assurance Program and Guidelines (NUREG/BR-0167)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0167 (PDF - 3.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 1993

Division of Information Support Services  Office of Information Resources Management  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

This document offers guidance to both NRC organizations and NRC contractors in the development and maintenance of software for use by the NRC staff.

This document is based on various industry standards, shown under references, and therefore meets the current industry standards for the operational levels of software described herein. This document may provide guidance but does not address the complex issue of software quality for software used in nuclear plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021