alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Airmen Complete Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Explosives Training 

By Staff Sgt. David Owsianka374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Review of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents" (NUREG/CR-6953)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report - Fiscal Year 2015 (NUREG-1542, Volume 21)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG–1542, Volume 21 (PDF – 3.72 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: November 2015

Division of Planning and Budget Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Introduction

The Fiscal Year 2015 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) presents the agency's program performance and financial management information in compliance with the Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010. The PAR gives the President, Congress, and the American public the opportunity to assess the agency's perfomance in achieving its mission and the stewardship of its resources.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2015129EN.01005301.xml

| 27.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/53

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 of 20 April 2015 laying down calculation methods and reporting requirements pursuant to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 107 of 25 April 2015
  )

On page 31, Annex I, Part 1, point 3, in the formula:

for:

‘
  GHHix

  ’,

GHHix

read:

‘
  GHGix

  ’.

GHGix

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,507,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,539,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,981,586
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,120,764
<PP&E>                                      15,245,544
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,204,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,649,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,147,244
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,868
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,498,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,649,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,725,537
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,934,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (34,122)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,129,727
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,242,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,242,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,242,605)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)


</TABLE>
#### JOHN C. BLAKE v. WILLIAM F. ASKEW.

Practice *in Supreme Court — Feigned Issue.*

An action upon a feigned issue, brought by appeal to this Court, will be dismissed.

Civil ActioN, tried at Fall Term, 1875, of Wake Superior Court before Henry, *J.*

The action was commenced in a Justice’s Court and taken by appeal to the Superior Court and the facts wrere found to be as follows:

That the plaintiff in June, 1874, entered into an agreement with defendant, to-wit; “ For and in consideration of' one dollar paid by said Askew to said Blake and in farther consideration of the mutual promise herein set forth, that said Blake is to deliver to said Askew one coupon bond of the State of North Carolina issued since the war, valid and *326binding upon the said State and of the par value of $1,000. That upon the delivery of the said bond the said Askew will pay the said Blake the sum of $200, as the consideration for the purchase of said State bond.” (This instrument of writing was signed by the plaintiff and defendant in this action.)

That plaintiff tendered the bond in discharge of his part <of said agreement and defendant refused to accept the same. Thereupon the plaintiff brought this action to recover the said $200.

That said bond with others was issued under ch. 20, Laws 1868-’69, to aid in the construction of the Western Division of the Western North Carolina Railroad and was delivered lby the Public Treasurer to the President of said Western Division.

That at the time said Act was ratified, to-wit; January 29th, 18f)9, the bonds of the State were not at par and the subject of the appropriation as made was not submitted to a vote of the people of the State.

That at the time of the adoption of the Constitution of 1868, no work had been done on that portion of said road for which said bond was issued, to-wit; the Western Division, &c.

Upon these facts His Honor held that said bond was- not “'valid and binding on the State of North Carolina.”

Judgment for defendant. Appeal by plaintiff.

*Messrs. Battle Mordecai,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs.*Merrirnon, *Fuller ‡ Ashe*and *Smith $ Strong,*for defendant.

Reads, J.

If feigned issues were ever entertained in this State, they are abolished by the Constitution, Art. 4, § 1.

This is manifest by a feigned issue based upon a wager to test the validity of certain bonds said to have been issued *327b>y the State alleged in the pleadings to amount to $5,000, ■000:

Besides the objection that it is a feigned issue which is forbidden by the Constitution, it is an attempted fraud upon 'the State, by putting her interests in jeopardy and affecting her credit, in a controvery to which she is not a party.

The action is “ not fit to be entertained ” and is therefore ■dismissed.

Each party will pay his own costs.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-1796)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1796	           - Cover - Chapter 2 (PDF - 25.3 MB)
          - Chapter 3 - End (PDF - 44.7 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2004**Manuscript Published:**October 2004

**Prepared by:**T.J. Kim and R. Auluck

Division of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station (DNPS), Units 2 and 3 and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA) by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (staff). By letter dated January 3, 2003, Exelon Generation Company (Exelon or the applicant) submitted the LRA for Dresden and Quad Cities (D/QCNPS) in accordance with Title 10, Part 54 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 54 or the Rule). Exelon requests renewal of the operating licenses for DNPS Unit 2 (License No. DRP-19), DNPS Unit 3 (License No. DRP-25), QCNPS Unit 1 (License No. DRP-29), and QCNPS Unit 2 (License No. DRP-30) for a period of 20 years beyond the current license expirations of midnight, December 22, 2009; January 12, 2011; December 14, 2012; and December 14, 2012, respectively.

DNPS is located in Grundy County, Illinois, on the shore of a man-made cooling lake, with the Illinois River to the north and the Kankakee River to the east. The QCNPS is located in Rock Island County, IL, on the east bank of the Mississippi River opposite the mouth of the Wapsipinicon River, and about 3 miles north of Cordova, IL. DNPS, Units 1 and 2, and QCNPS, Units 2 and 3, each consist of a General Electric boiling-water reactor (BWR/3) authorized to operate individually at a steady state reactor power level not to exceed 2957 megawatts-thermal, or approximately 850 megawatts-electric.

This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted to the NRC through June 22, 2004, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER. The staff identified open items and confirmatory items that had to be resolved before the staff could make a final determination on the application. Sections 1.5 and 1.6 of this report summarize these items and their resolutions. Section 6 provides the staff's final conclusion of its review of the D/QCNPS LRA.

The NRC license renewal project manager is Mr. Rajender Auluck. Mr. Auluck may be reached at (301) 415-1025. Written correspondence should be addressed to the License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### JOHN COLLETT and others v. L. R. HENDERSON and others.

*Tenants in Common*— Partition *of Land.*

Upon partition of land among tenants in common, the tenant who has-improved a part thereof is entitled to have it allotted to him at a valuation without regard to the improvements.

*(Pope*v. Whitehead, 68 N. C., 191, cited and approved.)

Proceeding for division of land between tenants.in common, heard on appeal at Pall Term, 1878, of Burke Superior Court, before *Gudger, J.*

Commissioners were appointed by the court and ordered! to divide the land described in the pleadings into three equal parts, assessing the more valuable dividends with such sums as may be necessary to be paid to the dividends-of inferior value to make the division equal; and they were directed to assign to the tenants such shares in the land as would include the part improved by them respectively, valuing the share at what it would have been worth without the improvements, and to report their proceedings to court for further orders. Prom this judgment the defendants appealed.

No counsel for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Bynum, Armfield*and *Bailey*for defendants..

Smith, C. J.

The judgment for partition among the several tenants of land held by them in common directs the-commissioners, when any of them have caused valuable improvements to be put on portions of the land, to assess their value as if no such improvements had been made .and to allot the parts improved to those who had made them. In this we find no error. It would be unjust and inequitable in the others to take the common property enhanced in-*338value by the expenditures of one of them without making him compensation, and he would be entitled to an account. The same result is reached without the expense and delay •of a reference, by allotting to such the improved parts, valued without regard to the improvements. Such is the judgment in this case and it has the sanction of the ruling in *Pope*v. *Whitehead,*68 N. C, 191.

As no statement of the case accompanies the transcript and no errors are assigned by the appellant, or are apparent in the record, according to the settled practice in this court the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

No error. , Affirmed.
Transport Transports

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian 

registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard.

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

1/1 No.

CF-2014-22

Issue Date

16 July 2014

Number: CF-2014-22

ATA: 27 Type Certificate: A-142

Subject: Flight Controls – Outboard Spoiler Power Control Unit (PCU) – Inadvertent Spoiler 

Deployment

Effective Date: 30 July 2014

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model DHC-8-400, -401 and -402 aeroplanes, serial numbers 4001, 

4003 through 4453.

Compliance: Within 6000 hours air time or 3 years, whichever occurs first, from the effective 

date of this AD, unless already accomplished.

Background: Although AD CF-2009-26 was issued to mandate the upgrade of the spoiler lift/dump 

valve, it did not reduce the rate of inadvertent single spoiler deployment occurrences. 

Further investigation revealed that the outboard spoiler PCUs may also be subject to 

pressure reversals at the PCU main control valve seal, resulting in leakage at the piston 

head seal and piston rod seals. If not corrected, this condition may result in reduced 

controllability of the aeroplane.

This AD mandates the replacement of the existing outboard spoiler PCUs with the 

upgraded PCUs with re-designed seals for better leakage protection.

Corrective 

Actions:

Incorporate the Modsum 4-113783 in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of 

Bombardier Inc. Service Bulletin (SB) 84-27-63, Initial Revision, dated 17 October 2013, 

or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Robin Lau

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Gordanko Jeremic, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister 

in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp

24-0022 (01-2005)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# High Energy Arcing Fault Frequency and Consequence Modeling – Final Report (NUREG-2262, EPRI 3002025942)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2262 (PDF – 42.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**April 2023

Availability Notice

## Abstract

**Keywords**

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 02, 2023
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Kewaunee Power Station: Docket No. 50-305, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (NUREG-1958)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1958            - Cover - Section 2 (PDF - 9.77 MB)
          - Section 3 - End (PDF - 40.1 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2011**Date Published:** January 2011

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) license renewal application (LRA) by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (the staff). By letter dated August 12, 2008, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (Dominion, DEK, or the applicant) submitted the LRA in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the *Code of Federal Regulations*, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." Dominion requests renewal of the KPS operating license (Facility Operating License Number DPR-43) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration at midnight on December 21, 2013.

KPS is located in the Town of Carlton, Wisconsin, in the southeast corner of Kewaunee County, Wisconsin, on the western shore of Lake Michigan. The staff issued the original construction permit for KPS on August 6, 1968, and the operating license on December 21, 1973. The plant's nuclear steam supply system consists of a 2-loop pressurized water reactor with a dry, ambient containment (PWR-DRYAMB). The nuclear steam supply system was supplied by Westinghouse. The balance of the plant was originally designed and constructed by Pioneer Service and Engineer Company. KPS operates at a licensed power output of 1,772 megawatt-thermal (MWt), with a gross electrical output of approximately 590 megawatt-electric (MWe).

Unless otherwise indicated, this SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted through October 20, 2010, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER. The four open items previously identified by the staff for the SER with open items have been closed (see SER Section 1.5); therefore, no open items remain to be resolved before the final determination is reached by the staff on the LRA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffInformation Technology/Information Management Strategic Plan (NUREG-1908)

# Information Technology/Information Management Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2016 – 2020 (NUREG-1908, Volume 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1908, Volume 3 (PDF - 2.77 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2015**Date Published:**October 2015

**Prepared by:**Daniel S. Shapiro, Information Technology Specialist

Office of Information ServicesU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Information Technology/Information Management (IT/IM) Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2016 – 2020 describes how IT/IM goals and strategies at the NRC support and enable the agency's mission. The IT/IM Strategic Plan responds to Federal Requirements in the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996, serving as the NRC's strategic information resources management plan in accordance with Section 3506(b)(2) of the PRA. The plan lays out the mission and vision for the agency's IT/IM efforts and establishes six goals along with the associated strategies. It also defines measures of success in attaining the goals. This plan provides the technology and strategic guidance that helps to inform and support the agency's budget formulation and prioritization processes over the next 3 – 5 years.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 91-6280.

#### Kutnyak *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2010

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
#### Reudebusch and others, Respondents, vs. City of Beaver Dam, Appellant.

*September 15*

October *13, 1931.*

*James F. Malone*of Beaver Dam, for the appellant.

*William N. Poivers*of Madison, for the respondents.

Fairchild, J.

This case arises out of facts similar to those considered in the petition of *Christoph v. City of Chilton, ante,*p. 418, 237 N. W. 134, and is ruled by the decision there made, wherein it was held that the section above referred to is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county is reversed, with directions to dismiss the petition.

Owen, Fritz, and Wicichem, JJ., dissent.