Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1048 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip ML Kapp 2001 Beaver Channel Parkway Clinton IA 52732-7028 2001 Beaver Channel Parkway

Clinton IA 52732-7028

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification Yes Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 4Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 5Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 6Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 7Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 8Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 9Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 10Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 11Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 12Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 13Facility _Information Facility : ML KappThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1048 1 Manager Environmental Services Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradleypincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 1048 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1048 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1048 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Oil/W ater separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Oily

W ater TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Used Oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Used Oil Adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1048 Wa ter based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 1048 2 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 1932 2332 229

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 212.4 86.82 85 2000 2000 1.12 1.13 FALSE 1.14

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.15 6252 48.69 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes Yes

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1048 2 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.9 1048 2 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.51 1048 2 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.52 1048 2 natural gas 2007 0.1 1048 2 natural gas 2008 0.49 1048 2 natural gas 2009 0.48

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1048 2 Low NOx Burner 11/1/2002 1048 2 Overfire Air 9/1/2009

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 1048 2 Low Sulfur Coal 7/1/2000

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online 1048 2 Flue gas conditioning to control opacity (e.g., SO3 injection, ammonia, other) 4/1/1995

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 1048 2

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1048 2 2

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1048 ESP-2 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 7/1/1979

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1048 Stack-2

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1048 Unit 2 Stack 245 13

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1048 Unit 2

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1048 Unit 2 2 1 Unit 1048 Unit 2 ESP-2 2 PM control 1048 Unit 2 Stack-2 3 Sam pling Port next 1048 Unit 2 Unit 2 Stack 4 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1048 Unit 2 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

618 pound per hour (lb/hr) 0.32 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1048 Unit 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

8307 pound per hour (lb/hr)

3 hours 4.3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1048 Unit 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

869.4 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 0.45 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1048 Unit 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

558 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 0.289 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) Lim its 1&2 are per 3 run averages. See Notes # 1.01 & # 1.02 (This is Total PM = PM(Filterable) + PM (Condensible)) No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency 3 hours See Note # 1.03 No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75, Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 3-hour rolling average in lbs./MMBtu of SO2 emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions. 30 days See Note # 1.04 No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 30-day rolling averages in lbs./MMBtu of NOx and CO emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions. 30 days See Note # 1.05 No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 30-day rolling averages in lbs./MMBtu of NOx and CO emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions.

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 38configuration_pollutants1 The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 39configuration_pollutants1 The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 40configuration_pollutants1 The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 41control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 42control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 43control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 44control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 45control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 46control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 47control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 48control_costs

CBI

Page 49mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 50mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 51fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 1048 200903-Coal 3/1/2009 9592.33 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 26891.52 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 61822.66 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 60025.28 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 51386.26 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 53503.73 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 49920.67 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 40617.61 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1048 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 27186.42 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY

Page 52fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method

Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge

Page 53fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1048 200903-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200904-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200905-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200906-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200907-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200908-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200909-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200910-Coal

Unit 2 1048 200911-Coal

Unit 2

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 56fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 58fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 59test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing at unit 2 Stack 8/21/2007 8/21/2007 No No 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

other Diagnostic Mercury testing at Unit 2 Stack ######## ######## No No 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

compliance Metals Testing at Unit 2 Stack 6/8/2006 6/8/2009 No No 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

compliance Particulate Testing at Unit 2 Stack 6/8/2006 6/8/2006 No No 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

other Diagnostic Particulate testing at unit 2 Stack 2/25/2009 2/25/2009 No No

Page 60test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No

Page 61test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Unit 2 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Unit 2 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Unit 2 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Unit 2 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Unit 2

Page 62test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Subbitum inous 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Subbitum inous 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Subbitum inous 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Subbitum inous 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Subbitum inous

Page 63test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 64cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 1048 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for ML Kapp Unit 2. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 65cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for ML Kapp Unit 2. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 66cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for ML Kapp Unit 2. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 67cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 1048 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Total Mercury

(Hgt)

Page 68test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Stack-2 No No 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 No No 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 No No 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Stack-2 No No 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 No No

Page 69test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 70sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Stack-2 average 8/21/2007 8/21/2007 207 13.1 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average ######## ######## 173 8.8 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average 6/8/2006 6/8/2006 211 9.7 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Stack-2 average 6/8/2006 6/8/2006 211 10.5 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 average 2/25/2009 2/25/2009 210 10

Page 71sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 457137 dscfm 68 1 4.7 14.9 1.08 379585 dscfm 68 1 8 12 1.09 606625 dscfm 68 1 6.8 13.2 1.07 577136 dscfm 68 1 6.8 13.2 1.06 483001 dscfm 68 1 6.4 13.2 1.11

Page 72sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.98 10 Subbitum inous 207 131367 6.78 11827 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 173 8.31 11661 1 29 Subbitum inous 211 6.88 11998 1 201A/202 Subbitum inous 211 6.88 11988 0.98 OTM027/202 Subbitum inous 210 136967 7.04 11743

Page 73sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.37 0.44 0.59 0.59 0.44

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Stack-2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0186 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Stack-2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0263 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20060608

Stack-2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0161 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Arsenic (As) 4.925 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Beryllium (Be) 0.336 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Cadmium (Cd) 0.184 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Chromium (Cr) 17.782 mi lligram per cubic meter (mg/m3) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Lead (Pb) 6.204 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Manganese (Mn) 17.901 mi lligram per cubic meter (mg/m3)

FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 11.005 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Nickel (Ni) 13.235 mi lligram per cubic meter (mg/m3) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Selenium (Se) 72.655 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-CO-20070821

Stack-2 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 211.9 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 5.25 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 4.15 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.1 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.0018 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0289 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0081 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0164 FALSE 1048 KAPP2-PM-20090225

Stack-2 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0107 FALSE

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 92.04 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0391 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0186 grains/dscf) 129.897 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0556 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0263 grains/dscf) 79.755 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0338 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0161 grains/dscf) 0.0112 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.51E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000763 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 3.08E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000418 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.69E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0403 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.64E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0141 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.68E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0407 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.64E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.025 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.01E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.03 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.22E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.165 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.66E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 421.8 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.194 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.007 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.175 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.0057 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.092 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.0013 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.082 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.000003 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 0.00176 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 119.628 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0577 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0289 grains/dscf) 36.247 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0176 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0081 grains/dscf) 67.859 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0329 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0164 grains/dscf) 44.21 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0214 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0107 grains/dscf)

Page 76sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0186 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0263 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0161 grains/dscf)

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0289 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0081 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0164 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0107 grains/dscf)

Page 77sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1048 KAPP2-Hg-20071030

Stack-2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.09 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Arsenic (As) 2 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Chromium (Cr) 19 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Lead (Pb) 4 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Manganese (Mn) 14 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.22 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1048 KAPP2-Metals-20060608

Stack-2 average Nickel (Ni) 149 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 78sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 79