alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# RBHT Reflood Heat Transfer Experiments Data and Analysis (NUREG/CR-6980)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6980 (PDF - 29.90 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2011**Date Published:**April 2012

**Prepared by:** L. E. Hochreiter Fan-Bill Cheung T. F. Lin J. P. Spring S. Ergun A. Sridharan A. Ireland E. R. Rosal (Applied Research Laboratory)

The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code N6154

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A total of 25 valid bottom reflood heat transfer experiments have been performed in the Pennsylvania State University/U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) Test Facility to examine the effects of both dispersed flow film boiling and inverted annular film boiling in rod bundle geometry. The RBHT Test Facility had a full length, 3.66 m (12 ft), 7x7 rod array with typical pressurized water reactor rod diameters of 9.49 mm (0.374 in) and a rod pitch of 12.59 mm (0.496 in). The heater rods had a top skewed power shape with a peak to average power of 1.5 at the 2.77 m (9.08 ft) elevation. The ranges of conditions for the experiments were pressures from 138 to 414 kPa (20 to 60 psia), flooding rates from 0.0254 to 0.1524 m/s (1 to 6 in/s), and initial peak clad temperatures from 1033 to 1144 degrees K (1400 to 1600 degrees F), inlet subcooling from 11 to 83 degrees K (20 to 150 degrees F), and peak powers of 1.32 to 2.31 kW/m (0.4 to 0.7 kW/ft). The experiments were performed using a constant power rather than simulating the reactor decay power. The use of a constant bundle power extended the reflood transient several hundred seconds and resulted in quasi-steady film boiling over the majority of the bundle length. There were approximately 500 channels of transient data recorded for each test including the bundle power, heater rod temperatures, upper plenum pressure, inlet flow rate, inlet water subcooling, superheated vapor temperatures in the bundle, spacer grid temperatures, liquid carryover of the bundle, and the detailed axial bundle pressure drop. Transient mass balances were typically within five percent for the low flooding rate experiments, and larger for the higher flooding rate experiments. The experimental data has been qualified and submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission data bank for analysis and computer code validation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
NO. COURT OF APPEALS NO. 06-14-00165-CR IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

### BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW,. RECEIVEDSW 

## Appellant/Petitioner COURTOFCRIWALAPPEALS

v. 

## MAY222015 THESTATEOFTEXAS, Ab@!ACQSta,Clerk Appellee/Respondent ^ 

### On appeal from the Sixth Court of Appeals FILEDIN 

## Texarkana, Texas C0URTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS
MOTION TO SUSPEND RULE 9.3(b) 

### AbelAcosta,Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: NOW COMES, BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW, Appellant?Petitioner, in the above styled and numbered cause andmoves the Court to suspend 

### Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In support of this motion Petitioner shows the Court as follows: I. Petitioner is currently incarcerated in the Mark W. Michael Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division in Tennessee Colony, Texas.II. 

### Rule 9.3(b) states in pertinent part: "Aparty must file the original and 11 copies of any document addressed to...the Court of Criminal Appeals..." See TEX. R. APP. PROC, Rule 9.3(b). Petition er requests stay to file only the original of his Petition for Dis cretionary Review. III. 

### Due to Petitioner's current incarceration, he is unable to 

### duplicate any documents because he does not have access to a copy ing machine. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Barney Samuel Bradshaw re spectfully requests that the Court suspend Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this case. Respectfully submitted,
BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW PETITIONER TDCJ No. 01942978 Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054

.Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore going motion has been served by placing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 15th day of May, 2015, addressed to 

### Rusk County District Attorney and State Prosecuting Attorney. IMVjS/^ BARNEY SAMUEL BRADSHAW PETITIONER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     158,972,899
<SECURITIES>                                 1,472,991
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,119,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                   735,000
<INVENTORY>                                    727,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           181,751,603
<PP&E>                                      90,631,711
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,558,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             319,264,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,739,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,482
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,640,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               319,264,803
<SALES>                                      7,086,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,086,471
<CGS>                                        4,475,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,483,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,331,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,649,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,649,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,649,935)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.20)
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2023

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, February 2, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, February 2, 2024
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRulemaking DocumentsRulemaking Dockets

# Rulemaking Dockets for 2006

subscribe to page updates
*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 5, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-71-2014]

On October 1, 2014, Greater Miami Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 32, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Brightstar Corporation, within FTZ 32—Site 6, in Miami, Florida.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 60807, October 8, 2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: January 23, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01990 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
ex4_6.htm


Exhibit 4.6


 




	  	
PROMISSORY NOTE

	
December 30, 2010

















Denver, Co.




 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED from the undersigned loan provider, the undersigned borrower promises to pay to the principal sum of thirty six thousand dollars ($36,000.00) by March 30, 2010. The borrower also agrees to pay an additional $2,000 for every month the balance is overdue. In addition to signing on behalf of Penny Auction Solutions, Inc., by signing below, the borrower is also agreeing to personally guarantee full payment should the company default on the aforementioned loan / Promissory Note.







Each maker and endorser waives demand, protest and notice of maturity, non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold them liable as makers and endorsers and, should litigation be necessary to enforce this note, each maker and endorser waives trial by jury and consents to the personal jurisdiction and venue of a court of subject matter jurisdiction located in the State of Colorado and County of Denver.


 


Each maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of this note or any payment on the principal or any interest thereon is not paid at the respective maturity thereof, or in case it becomes necessary to protect the security hereof, whether suit be brought or not.


 


Each maker and endorser hereby agrees that this note may be recorded.







This note is to be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Colorado; upon default in the payment of principal, the whole sum of principal remaining unpaid shall, at the option of the holder, become immediately due and payable and it shall accrue interest at the highest rate allowable by law, or, if no highest rate is otherwise indicated, at twenty (20%) percent per annum, from the date of default.







Default shall include, but shall not be limited to non-payment within ten (10) days from the due date set out herein.







Unless specifically disallowed by law, should litigation arise hereunder, service of process therefore may be obtained through certified mail, return receipt requested; the parties hereto waiving any and all rights they may have to object to the method by which service was perfected.


 



	  	  
	  	  
	
Loan Provider (Maker)

	  












 



	  	  
	
Promisor Signature (Corey Park CEO – Penny Auction Solutions, Inc.)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffReactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants [NUREG

# Environmental Survey of Transportation of Radioactive Materials to and from Nuclear Power Plants, Supplement 1 (NUREG-75/038)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-75/038, Supplement 1 (PDF - 897.03 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: April 1975

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Supplement 1 to WASH-1238, "Environmental Survey of Transportation of Radioactive Materials to and from Nuclear Power Plants," has been prepared by the Office of Standards Development, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This supplement presents data and identifies methods used to derive the environmental impact and risk values in Summary Table S-4, "Environmental Impact of Transportation of Fuel and Waste to and from One Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor." Summary Table S-4 is referred to and set out following section 51.20(g) of the Commission's regulation, "Licensing and Regulatory Policy and Procedures for Environmental Protection," 10 CFR Part 51.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


     Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Albert J. Marino, the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
Highlands Insurance Group, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2002
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   August 14, 2002            /s/ Albert J. Marino
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Albert J. Marino
                                    Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station -Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 28)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report  (NUREG-1801)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
February 25 , 2016

Federal Aviat ion Administration

AFS

- 80 Washington, D.C.

SUBJECT: Silent Falcon UAS 333 Exemption. Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 5508

I am in receipt of your letter dated February 8, 2016 that informed me you were unable to process our 333 exemption any further without us explaining the re asons why granting the request would be in the public

interest. This letter is to address this question.

I want to break the public interest into various parts and address them individually.

1. Possible Improvements in Airspace Safety

. This 333 exemption will be beneficia l to furthering airspace safety. We have ongoing activity in both developing and evaluating other developed technology to address a significant concern with integration of UAS into the National Airspace.

S pecifically we are actively working on Detect, Sense (or See) and Avoid technolog y that could be equipped on small

- unmanned aircraft, or larger aircraft if desired. The specific focus area we are investigation in DETECT portion of the problem with both small low

- cost RADAR and acoustic

sensors. 2. Safe low

- altitude mapping operations. Some of our uses for the Silent Falcon involve mapping, be it construction, agriculture, utility corridors, or planning na tural resource extraction. By conducting these operations at lower altitude than safely performed with manned aviation assets we both enhance the value of the imagery and believe we improve safety, as there is no requirement in these s ituations to fly a manned aircraft or helicopter to perform the missions.

3. Employee safety. We desire to support surveyors in this country as we do others today. We have operational systems that allow surveyors to avoid having to traverse rugged terrain to conduct their analysis of natural resource extraction options. B y affordably deriving survey grade map products

from our aerial sensor data (LiDAR, Optical, Spectral , etc.) we have been able to reduce the time surveyor crews are in the field and sp ecifically able to reduce that time where access is limited and

hazardous.

4. Security. We have sold our systems to foreign military organizations and they are using them to help their interests. With the 333 exemption we can more easily develop and evaluate our technology for

our domestic military. This could add if our defense sees fit to the US security objective.

We are realizing reason 2 and 3 of these overall public benefits in international markets today. With the 333

we will extend our business to domestic partners and address the first benefit and further expand domestically

on all the reasons.

If you are seeking further elaboration please notify me again and I ’ ll be happy to elaborate further.

Sincerely,

Gregory W. Walker

Chief Operating Officer
Washington Bancorp
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
              Exhibit 11 For the three months ended September 30,
<TABLE>


                                                          1999       1998       1999        1998
                                                          Basic      Basic     Diluted     Diluted
Computation of weighted average                            EPS        EPS        EPS         EPS
      number of common shares                            ------------------    -------------------
      outstanding:
<S>                                                      <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Common shares outstanding
      at the beginning of the period ...............     651,133    651,133    651,133     651,133
Unreleased common shares held by the
      Employee Stock Ownership
      Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
      of the period ................................     (37,972)   (42,313)   (37,972)    (42,313)
Weighted average common shares
      released by the ESOP during
      the period ...................................        564         522        564         522
Weighted average common shares
      outstanding - Stock Option Plan ..............        - -         - -     10,001      16,728
Weighted average common shares
      into treasury ................................    (51,913)    (35,270)   (51,913)    (35,270)
                                                       --------------------   --------------------
Total average shares outstanding ...................    561,812     574,072    571,813     590,800
                                                       ====================   ====================

Net income                                             $222,765    $195,163   $222,765    $195,163
                                                       ====================   ====================

Net income per share                                   $   0.40    $   0.34   $   0.39    $   0.33
                                                       ====================   ====================

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles H.R. Bracken, Co-Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: April 28, 2005 |  | /s/CHARLES H.R. BRACKENCharles H.R. Bracken
Co-Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Shackleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JOHN SHACKLETONJohn ShackletonPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 5, 2008