alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD2 Post-Test Calculation of the OECD LOFT Experiment LP–SB–2 (NUREG/IA–0087, ICSP–LP–SB–2–R)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0087 (PDF 1.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 1992

**Prepared by:** J. Perez, R. Mendizabal

Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (C.S.N.) Madrid, Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents the analysis of the OECD LOFT LP–SB–2 experiment performed by the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear of Spain working group making use of RELAP5/MOD2 in the frame of the Spanish LOFT Project.

LP–SB–2 experiment studies the effect of a delayed pump trip in a small break LOCA scenario with a 3 inches equivalent diameter break in the hot leg of a commercial PWR.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Quantitative Code Assessment with Fast Fourier Transform Based Method Improved by Signal Mirroring (NUREG/IA-0220)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0220 (PDF - 5.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**December 2009

**Prepared by:** A. Prošek, B. Mavko,  Jožef Stefan Institute Jamova cesta 39 SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In recent years, the number of quantitative comparisons between experimental data and calculated data in the area of nuclear technology has increased. The fast Fourier transform based method (FFTBM) is the tool most widely used to quantify the accuracy of thermalhydraulic code calculations, which are continuing to improve. However, in preliminary applications of the original FFTBM to a severe accident test, the need for further optimization became evident. Analysts observed that FFTBM favors certain trends (e.g., monotonic increasing function). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to improve this aspect of FFTBM. Improvement was achieved by signal mirroring. Among other improvements, an index for the detection of the time shift between the compared signals was proposed. For the demonstration of improved FFTBM by signal mirroring, the analysis used the Loss of Fluid Test (LOFT) L2-5 test (large-break loss-of-coolant accident). Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, and the conclusions about the quality of reference calculations were compared with those of the Best-Estimate Methods Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation (BEMUSE). The results show that, with improved FFTBM, the analyst can achieve a true picture of the contribution of each discrepancy to the accuracy as judged by FFTBM. Analysis that considers the improved FFTBM tool as a "black box" obtains optimal information, which greatly aids the analyst in making a final judgment about the calculation. "Black box" here is meant that no information of the curve shape is input by the user to the FFTBM tool. The easy-to-use method is best suited to the automated comparison of several calculations of the same test.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1990 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1990

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow food concessions at 
                   State-owned interstate rest areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2017

  Mr. Banks of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow food concessions at 
                   State-owned interstate rest areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REST AREAS.

    (a) Food Concessions.--Section 111(b)(2) of title 23, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:
                    ``(D) concessions, including restaurants, food 
                services, and convenience stores;''.
    (b) Tax Revenues.--Section 111(b)(4) of such title is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding the preceding 
sentence, a State may use revenues received from concessions under 
paragraph (2)(D) to support any program authorized under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 21, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 21, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A1887. MARGARET HYLTON JONES d/b/a MARGARET JONES & ASSOCIATES 

v. BROCK BUILT, LLC. et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
### SERVED: MAY 1, 

### 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### TRANS NORTHAVIATION, LTD. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0046


### HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on

### July 23, 24 and 25, 2013, inclusive, in the 

### U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 498, Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 517 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List ·

12

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Charles R. Barnett III, Respondent's Counsel Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520

.FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette B. Daubaras,·Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)Division 5 - Materials and Plant Protection

# Materials and Plant Protection (Division 5): Regulatory Guides 5.21 - 5.40

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 5, "Materials and Plant Protection," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

Regulatory Guides are reviewed about every 10 years, although a guide may be reviewed more frequently if the staff believes an emerging issue affects the guide. The NRC began these reviews in 2010, and began posting the results of its reviews on this site in 2013. The review dates are hyperlinked to the review memorandum, which provide useful information about the status and any known issues with the associated regulatory guide.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Regulatory Guides 5.1 - 5.20
          - Regulatory Guides 5.21 - 5.40
          - Regulatory Guides 5.41 - 5.60
          - Regulatory Guides 5.61 - 5.80
          - Regulatory Guides 5.81 - 5.100

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mniteb**~tate5'** 

# (!Court of**~peaI5'** 

# for tbe jf 

# eberaI (!Circuit

STACY CARSON AND 

### AMY CARSON, AS LEGAL GUARDIANS FOR KIT CARSON, Petitioners-Appellants, 

### v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee.

2010-5089 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 02-VV-873, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.


### ORDER The Secretary ofHealth and Human Services submits a status report in response to this court's December 21, 2012 order requesting that the stay ofbriefing be lifted. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The stay ofthe briefing schedule is lifted.CARSON v. HHS 2 (2) The Secretary's response brief is due within 40 days ofthe date offiling ofthis order. (3) The appellants' reply brief is due within 14 days ofthe date of service ofthe Secretary's response brief. FOR THE COURT 

## JAN 1 0 2013 Date

cc: David P. Matthews, Esq. Heather L. Pearlman, Esq. s21 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

# u.&~i~n~JOR JAN 1

# a2013 JAN HOR8AlY CLERK
Exhibit 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors

Foothills Resources, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-137925 on Form SB-2, as amended, of Foothills Resources, Inc., of our report dated April 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Foothills Resources, Inc., as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (December 29, 2005) through December 31, 2005..

BROWN ARMSTRONG PAULDEN

McCOWN STARBUCK THORNBURGH & KEETER

ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

Bakersfield, California

April 12, 2007
HOURS DOWNTIME

Nitric Acid Plant Tail Gas Stack

DATE CAUSE

1/7/2009 8:43 Shut-down the plant to fix a steam leak

1/9/2009 12:20

3/10/2009 3:32 Routine Gauze Change

3/10/2009 15:37

5/18/2009 10:16 Nitric Acid Plant Outage Due to Power Dip

5/18/2009 17:57

6/11/2009 5:59 Routine Gauze Change

6/11/2009 16:49

9/12/2009 14:47 Bi-Annual Maintenance Turnaround

10/2/2009 14:28
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **229**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TICO LOM B ARD FLEMING , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Ashe ville
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00033

- MR

- 4; 1:08

- cv - 00520

- MR )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tico Lombard Fleming , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray , Assistant United States Attorney s , Corey F. Ellis, Jill Westmoreland Rose , OFFICE O F THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ashevil le, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tico Lombard Fleming seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slac k v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fleming has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
for the periods presented therein.
 Date: May  9, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Steve TiradoSteve TiradoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
cc: Anthony Lee Monroe

Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A mer.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Review Committee.
    Date: February 24-25, 2015.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 
Montgomery County Conference Center Facility, 5701 Marinelli Road, 
North Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Stephanie Johnson Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0291, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95e6e1f0e5fdf4fbfcf0bbe2f0f7f7d5fbfcfdbbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94e7e0f1e4fcf5fafdf1bae3f1f6f6d4fafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01364 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Final: 12/12/03 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:

Consumer use expected?INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040139INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P040139INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040139INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040139INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 4 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040139INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P040139
#### Hardy, Guardian, Appellant, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company and another, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Jacobson & Malone*of Waukesha.

For the respondents: *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen*of Milwaukee, and *Lockney, Lowry & Hunter*of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### WILLIAM W. WELLBORN *vs.*JAMES JAMES.

June, 1839

Where a bond was given to secure the payment of a certain sum at a particular day, which sum was stated to be in part for a tractof land, and a condition was annexed that the obligee áhould keep the obligor “ indemnified as to the heirs” of acertain person, *it was held*that as the money was payableata particular day, and *the indemnity*provided for, indefinite as to time, the indemnity was not a condition precedent to the payment of the money.

This was an action of beet, upon a bond, in these words: “ Three years after date, I promise to pay unto William *W.*Wellborn, his heirs or assigns, one thousand dollars, in current bank notes of the State of North Carolina, for value received, a.s witness my hand and seal, this 15th of September,. 1831: Provided I maintain the right and possession of the tract of land for which this note is in part given; and in the event of my being subjected to costs of any suit or suits legally brought for said lands, by adverse claimants, the a. mount of said costs is to be deducted from the above amount, and the balance not to be paid until said suit or suits, as the case may be, are decided; also the said Wellborn is to keep me indemnified as to the heirs of Montgomery.

[Signed] James James, (Seal.) Test, N. Cannon.”

The defendant, among pther pleas, pleaded *non est factum,*upon which the cause was tried at Wilkes, on the last circuit, before his honor Judge Nash. Upon the trial, after the plaintiff had proved the execution of the bond and submitted his case, the defendant moved the court for a nonsuit, upon the ground that the bond contained a condition precedent of which the plaintiff had not proved the peformance, to wit: the last clause of the bond, *“*also said Wellborn is *to*keep me indemnified as to the heirs of Montgomery.” The court refused the nonsuit, and there being no other evidence given on either side, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant; after'an ineffectual motion for a new trial, appealed.

No counsel appeared for the defendant in this court.

*D. F. Caldvjell for*the plaintiff.

*235Daniel, Judge.

The action is brought to recover the sum of money mentioned in the body of the bond. . This sum was payable at a particular day. The condition annexed, that the plaintiff should keep the defendant indemnified as to the heirs of Montgomery, is indefinite as to time; it is a condition precedent to the payment, of the money. It was inserted for the benefit of the defendant; and if he had been evicted by the heirs of Montgomery, by a better title, he might have plead that fact specially in bar. As that event has not occurred, there is nothing to prevent the plaintiff’s recovering his debt, andinterest on the same, from the day it should have been paid. What remedy the defendant may have, if the heirs of Montgomery should hereafter disturb him, it is now unnecessary to decide. The judgment is affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.