alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.2 

 

 

 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS 

Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. consents to the references to our firm included in Repsol YPF, S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to the inclusion of our report dated January 27, 2011, as an exhibit to Repsol YPF, S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

 

			
	NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ G. Lance Binder

		 	G. Lance Binder, P.E.
		 	Executive Vice President


 Dallas, Texas 

February 3, 2011
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.


                                 ENDOCARE, INC.
                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                   September 30, 1996         September 30, 1996
                                                   ------------------         ------------------


<S>                                                 <C>                         <C>           
Net loss                                            $      (367,062)            $  (1,339,203)
                                                    ===============             =============


Weighted average number of common shares
      outstanding during the period                       5,638,943                 5,633,068
                                                    ===============             =============



Primary net loss per share                          $          (.07)            $        (.24)
                                                    ===============             =============

Fully diluted net loss per share                    $          (.07)            $        (.24)
                                                    ===============             =============
</TABLE>
    



         Notes:   Earnings per share data is not presented for 1995 because
                  Endocare was operating as a division of Medstone
                  International, Inc. at that time.

                  The effect of potential exercise of common stock options is
                  not included in these calculations because such effect would
                  be anti-dilutive.


                                     - 16 -
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

AQUA 1 POOLS & SPAS, INC. , Appellant

,

v.

ORLANDO HURTADO and NAHIMA HURTADO , Appellee s

.

No

. 4D2 3

- 761

[ August 10, 2023 ]

Nonfinal a ppeal from the County Court for the Seven teent h Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Kim Theresa Mollica

, Judge ; L.T. Case No. CONO22

- 001726

.
Jacqueline C. Ledón of Ledón Law, P.A., Miami

, for appellant

.
Scott J. Edwards of Scott J. Edwards, P.A., Boca Raton, and Andrew Rader of Cutler Rader, P.L.

, Coral Springs, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1169 

CAF 14-00547 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF KAYLA F., 

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

--------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MONROE COUNTY PRESENTMENT AGENCY, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

BRIAN STRAIT, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER, FOR

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MERIDETH H. SMITH, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (BRETT GRANVILLE OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Monroe County

(John B. Gallagher, Jr., J.), entered December 11, 2013 in a

proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The amended order

adjudicated respondent to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her in

the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services of Monroe

County for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the facts and the law by substituting for

respondent’s adjudication as a juvenile delinquent a finding that she

is a person in need of supervision and as modified the amended order

is affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an amended order

adjudicating her a juvenile delinquent based upon the finding that she

committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the

crime of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [2]). 

Respondent contends that Family Court abused its discretion in denying

her motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 311.4 (2) to substitute a

finding that she is a person in need of supervision (PINS) for a

finding that she is a juvenile delinquent, inasmuch as she

demonstrated no danger to the community at large and could have

received the same placement under a PINS disposition. We agree (see

Matter of Devon R., 278 AD2d 15, 15, lv denied 96 NY2d 707). A PINS

is “[a] person less than eighteen years of age who[, inter alia,] . .

. is incorrigible, ungovernable or habitually disobedient and beyond

the lawful control of a parent or other person legally responsible for

such child’s care” (Family Court Act § 712 [a]; see Matter of Gabriela

A., 103 AD3d 888, 889, affd 23 NY3d 155). Under the circumstances of

this case, we conclude that respondent’s conduct was consistent with

PINS behavior, not with juvenile delinquency (see Matter of Jeffrey

C., 47 AD3d 433, 434, lv denied 10 NY3d 707; see also Matter of Daniel
-2- 1169 

CAF 14-00547 

I., 57 AD3d 666, 668). We therefore modify the amended order by

substituting a finding that respondent is a person in need of

supervision for the adjudication that she is a juvenile delinquent. 

We have reviewed respondent’s remaining contentions and conclude that

they are without merit. 

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    - The Commission will consider whether to approve the 2015 budget of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and will consider the related annual accounting support fee for the Board under Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 28, 2015.

Lynn M. Powalski,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01955 Filed 1-29-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
____________, 2001


Mr. Eric W. J. Seidel
President
eAutoclaims.com, Inc.
2708 Alternate 19 North, Suite 507
Palm Harbor, FL 34683

Re:      eAutoclaims.com, CALP II Limited Partnership, Governs Road LLC

Dear Eric:

Further to my  conversations  with Tony Jessop,  I am writing to confirm that on
behalf of the preferred  share  investors (the  "Investors")  we are prepared to
extend  the April 30,  2001  deadline  referred  to in the  Master  Modification
Agreement between us on the following basis:

1.       On the  closing  of the Disks'  financing,  which is to occur not later
         than June 30,  2001,  the  Investors  will  receive a cash  payment  of
         $280,000.

2.       Penalties with respect to registration deadlines,  etc., referred to in
         the preferred share  documentation shall be waived during the period of
         this 60-day  extension  provided the  $280,000  payment is made and the
         registration  statement  covering the shares  underlying  the preferred
         shares,  the warrants,  and the other shares to be  registered  per our
         agreement are effective by June 30, 2001.

3.       We  acknowledge  that the  requirement  that  $2,000,000 of our stock
         be included in the offering has been waived/satisfied.

4.       The  period of our  lock-up  shall be  postponed/extended  for a 60-day
         period provided the conditions  noted above and the others contained in
         the Master Modification Agreement are met by June 30, 2001.

5.       As per the Master Modification  Agreement, if the June 30, 2001 date is
         not met, the lock-up will drop away,  etc., and the conversion price on
         the preference  shares shall be reduced from 75 to the lesser of 75% of
         market  and  62.5.  In  addition,   the  penalties  applicable  to  the
         preference shares would apply on a retroactive basis to April 30, 2001.

6.       A formal  agreement  reflecting  the terms of changes  shall be entered
         into  forthwith  (perhaps  most  appropriately  by  way  of an  amended
         modification  agreement) as deemed necessary and/or  appropriate by our
         respective counsel.

We trust this  appropriately  reflect the terms of our revised  arrangements and
would ask that you confirm  same by signing and  returning a copy of this letter
to us forthwith.

<PAGE>


In the meantime,  please accept our  congratulations  on the excellent  progress
with the business and we would reiterate our support for you and the company and
for the current offering.

Yours truly,

THOMSON KERNAGHAN & CO. LIMITED


Per:
    -------------------------------------------------
         Gregg Badger, Senior V.P. & Director

cc:      Tony Jessop
         Steve Hicks
         Christie Constabile
         Mark Valentine
         John Mann



AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED this ___ day of April, 2001.

eAUTOCLAIMS.COM, INC.


Per:
    -------------------------------------------------
         Eric Seidel, President
AAM-10-324-E 

Jul 15 2010 

 Exemption No. 9782A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0710 

Mr. Dale Woods 

Designated Employer Representative 

JAARS, Inc. 

P.O. Box 248 

Waxhaw, NC 28173 

Dear Mr. Woods: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9782. 

It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 1, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of JAARS, Inc. (JAARS), for an extension of Exemption No. 9782. That exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows JAARS which is operating 

under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one 

testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to JAARS. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9782 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of JAARS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the JAARS part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9782 to November 30, 2012, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9782 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9782. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003 I, Charles C.
Mottley, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)   such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc.
         for the year ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the
         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

   (2)   the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of El
         Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2003,
         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         result of operations of the El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc.



                             /s/ Charles C. Mottley
                             --------------------------------------
                             Charles C. Mottley
                             Chief Executive and Financial Officer
                             February 13, 2004

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO EL CAPITAN PRECIOUS METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY EL CAPITAN PRECIOUS METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# TechnicalBasis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on Design Ground Motions: Hazard- andRisk- Consistent Ground Motion Spectra Guidelines (NUREG/CR-5912, BNL-NUREG-52335)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5912 (PDF - 4.65 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 1992**Date Published:** October 1992

**Prepared by:** G. DeGrassi 

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

NRC FIN L1103

**Prepared for**: Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the results of a literature review on spent fuel rack seismic analysis methods and modeling procedures. The analysis of the current generation of free standing high density spent fuel racks requires careful consideration of complex phenomena such as rigid body sliding and tilting motions; impacts between adjacent racks, between fuel assemblies and racks, and between racks and pool walls and floor; fluid coupling and frictional effects. The complexity of the potential seismic response of these systems raises questions regarding the levels of uncertainty and ranges of validity of the analytical results.

BNL has undertaken a program to investigate and assess the strengths and weaknesses of current fuel rack seismic analysis methods. The first phase of this program involved a review of technical literature to identify the extent of experimental and analytical verification of the analysis methods and assumptions. Numerous papers describing analysis methods for free standing fuel racks were reviewed. However, the extent of experimental verification of these methods was found to be limited. Based on the information obtained from the literature review, the report provides an assessment of the significance of the issues of concern and makes recommendations for additional studies.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shyue-Ching Lu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: April 20, 2010



|       |  |                                      |  |                      
|------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|By:    |  |                                      |  | /s/    SHYUE-CHING
LU
|Name:  |  | Shyue-Ching Lu                      
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit (10)(b)(iii)



                                Third Amendment

                                    to the

                       Mcdonald's Profit Sharing Program

     The McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, as amended and restated effective
November 1, 1998 (the "Program"), and amended thereafter effective June 1, 2000
and January 1, 2001 is hereby further amended, effective March 1, 2001 as
follows:

I.   Effective, March 1, 2001, a new subparagraph shall be added to the end of
Section 1.31(b) to read as follows:


          (9)  Each individual who became an Employee of Boston Market
          Corporation, as a result of the acquisition of Boston West, L.L.C. and
          its affiliates ("Boston West") as of December 27, 2000, shall be
          credited with Hours of Service under the Program as of March 1, 2001,
          for their service with Boston West, Boston Market or Platinum for
          periods after June 30, 1998 to the date such individual first became
          an Employee. In determining the Hours of Service to be credited to
          Employees who receive credit for Hours of Service as a result of the
          acquisition of Boston West, the Plan Administrator shall rely on
          available information and, as necessary, shall make good faith
          estimates based upon available information and records.

II.  Except as herein amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

Executed as of this 21st day of March 2001.

                                              McDONALD'S CORPORATION

                                              By: /s/ Stanley R. Stein
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Stanley R. Stein
                                                  Executive Vice President
Exhibit 10.223



SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT of Lease (this Amendment) is made and entered into this day August 25, 2003, by and between
GREENWAY PROPERTIES, INC. (F.K.A. WESTERN CENTER PROPERTIES, INC.) (Landlord) and PPD DEVELOPMENT, LP (Tenant).



W I T N E S S E T H:



WHEREAS, the Tenant entered into a Lease, dated April 30, 2001 and as amended on August 15, 2001 of certain space located at 8551 Research Way,
Middleton, Wisconsin, in a Building known as the Research Center (Building); and



WHEREAS, the Landlord is the current owner of the real estate which is the subject matter of the Lease; and



WHEREAS, the Research Center has been expanded and the parties desire to decrease the pro-rata share of certain space to the premises on the terms and
conditions contained herein;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:



1. Pro Rata Share. Effective June 2, 2003 the pro rata share will change from Twelve point Eight percent (12.8%)
to Twelve point six percent (12.6%) (23,942 square feet of 190,549 square feet) as per calculation on attached Exhibit A.



2. Except as specifically amended herein, the Lease is hereby ratified and affirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. Each party acknowledges
that the other party is not in default under this Lease nor does either party know of any circumstance that, with the giving of notice, would result in the other party being in default under this Lease.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the day
and year first above written.



|                          |  |                     |  |     |  |                                 
|------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------
|LANDLORD:                 |  | TENANT:            
|                          | 
|GREENWAY PROPERTIES, INC. |  | PPD DEVELOPMENT, LP
|                          |  |                     | 
|                          |  |                     |  | By: |  | PPD GP, LLC, Its General Partner
|                          |  |                     | 
|By:                       |  | /s/ Scott Berger    |  | By: |  | /s/ Fred B. Davenport, Jr.      
|                          |  | Scott Berger        |  |     |  | Fred B. Davenport, Jr.          
|                          |  | Vice President      |  |     |  | Vice President                  



1



---

EXHIBIT A
No. 91-6169.

#### Baker *v.*Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, Attorneys at Law, P. C.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.