alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSite HelpIndex A-Z

# Index A-Z (I Entries)

**A |****B |****C |****D |****E |****F |****G |****H |****I |****J |****K |****L |****M |****N |****O |****P |****Q |****R |****S |****T |****U |****V |****W |****X |****Y |****Z**
        - ICRP Publication 103: Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007)  
        -  NRC's Synopsis of ICRP Publication 103  See Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations and Guidance 
        - IIFP Fluorine Extraction and Depleted Uranium Deconversion Plant Licensing 
        -  Correspondence and Other Information  Environmental Impact Statement  License Application  Opportunity for Hearing  Project Schedule  Public Involvement  Regulation and Legislation  Safety Evaluation Report            -  Meeting Archive  Meeting Schedule 
        - Incident Response Operations, Office of (See  Nuclear Security and Incident Response, Office of )
        - Index to Frequently Asked Questions Pages
        - Information Quality Guidelines: Seeking Correction to NRC Information
        - Annual Reports
        - Contact Us To Seek Correction of NRC Information
        - *Federal Register* Notice Issuing NRC Final Information Quality Guidelines
        - How NRC Will Process Your Request
        - How To Submit a Request for Correction
        - Information Correction Requests, Responses, and Appeals
        - OMB and Agency Responsibilities
        - Peer Review
        - Peer Review Agenda
        - NRC Peer Review Procedures
        - Information Security
        - Insider Threat Program for Licensees
        - Inspection Manual
        - Inspector General, Office of the
        - Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) reviews of NRC programs
        - See also IMPEP reviews of  Agreement State  programs.
        - Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) Toolbox
        - Interim Staff Guidance
        - Intern Program (See  Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program)
        - International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (See  International Programs, Organizations )
        - International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007 Recommendations of)   (ICRP Publication 103)	           - NRC's Synopsis of ICRP Publication 103  See  Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations and Guidance 
        - International Programs, Office of
        - Bilateral Relations
        - Contact Us About International Programs
        - Export-Import
        - International Organizations
        - International Programs
        - International Safeguards
        - Research Programs
        - Treaties and Conventions
        - Investigations, Office of
        - About Investigations
        - Field Offices
        - Issuances, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG-0750)

----

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, August 12, 2022
#### Smith, Appellant, vs. American Automobile Insurance Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Clarence E. Rinehard*of Chippewa Falls.

For the respondent: *Wilcox, Wilcox & Sullivan*of Eau Claire.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Sensitivity Studies of the Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Model Used in FAVOR (NUREG-1808)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1808 (PDF 1.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**  May 2006**Date Published:**  March 2010

**Prepared by:** M. EricksonKirk1, T. Dickson2, T. Mintz3, F. Simonen4

2Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

3Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX 78227-1301

4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

1Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

During plant operation, the walls of reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) are exposed to neutron radiation, resulting in localized embrittlement of the vessel steel and weld materials in the core area. If an embrittled RPV had an existing flaw of critical size and certain severe system transients were to occur, the flaw could very rapidly propagate through the vessel, resulting in a through-wall crack and challenging the integrity of the RPV. The severe transients of concern, known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS), are characterized by a rapid cooling (i.e., thermal shock) of the internal RPV surface in combination with repressurization of the RPV. Advancements in our understanding and knowledge of materials behavior, our ability to realistically model plant systems and operational characteristics, and our ability to better evaluate PTS transients to estimate loads on vessel walls led the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to realize that the earlier analysis, conducted in the course of developing the PTS Rule in the 1980s, contained significant conservatisms.

This report, which describes sensitivity studies performed on the probabilistic fracture mechanics model, is one of a series of 21 other documents detailing the results of the NRC study.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Update of Part 61 – Impacts Analysis Methodology: Codes and Example Problems (NUREG/CR-4370, Volume 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-4370, Volume 2 (PDF – 17.07 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 1985**Date Published:** January 1986

**Prepared by:**O. I Oztunali, W. D. Pon, R. Eng, Envirosphere Co.G. W. Roles, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Envirosphere CompanyTwo World Trade CenterNew York, New York 10048

**Prepared for:**Division of Waste ManagementOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555NRC FIN D1013

Availability Notice

## Abstract

If a state or state compact does not have adequate disposal capacity for low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) by 1986 as required by the Low-Level Waste Policy Act, then extended storage of certain LLRW may be necessary. In this report, extended storage of LLRW is considered in order to determine for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission areas of concern and actions recommended to resolve these concerns. The focus is on the properties and performance of the waste form and waste container. Storage alternatives are considered in order to characterize the likely storage environments for these wastes. The areas of concern about extended storage of LLRW are grouped into two categories:
        -  Performance of the waste form and/or container during storage, e.g., radiolytic gas generation, radiation-enhanced degradation of polymeric materials, and corrosion. 
        -  Effects of extended storage on the properties of the waste form and/or container that are important after storage (e.g., radiation-induced embrittlement of high-density polyethylene and the weakening of steel containers resulting from corrosion). 

A discussion is given of additional information and actions required to address these concerns.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Amendment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2011



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment Agreement (this
“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 31st
day of January 2011, by and between LKQ Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Joseph M. Holsten (the “Consultant”). 
 The Company and the Consultant are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated as of May 21, 2009 (the “Consulting Agreement”). The parties desire to amend the
Consulting Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein. 
 In consideration of the undertakings and
agreements of the respective parties set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3 of the Consulting Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


Compensation and Benefits During the Term. During the Term, the Company agrees (a) to pay Consultant at the rate of $290,000
annually in periodic installments, and (b) to provide for the continuation, at the Company’s expense (subject to contributions by Consultant at the same rate as employees of the Company), of substantially the same health benefits in effect
for Consultant immediately prior to the commencement of the Term. In addition, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), Consultant shall be entitled to receive the payments
relating to any Deferred Award (as defined in the LTIP) with respect to any Performance Period (as defined in the LTIP) in accordance with terms of the LTIP, if (a) Consultant is either an employee of the Company or a consultant to the Company
under the Consulting Agreement at the time such Deferred Award vests, or (b) Consultant is otherwise entitled to such payments pursuant to the terms of the LTIP. 
  

	 	2.	General. All other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed as of the day and year specified at the beginning hereof. 

 

			
	LKQ CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Victor M. Casini

	 Name: Victor M. Casini
 Title: Senior Vice President


	
	CONSULTANT
	
	 /s/ Joseph M. Holsten

	Joseph M. Holsten
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1800 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1800

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain Federal land 
to facilitate scientific research supporting Federal space and defense 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

Mr. Bishop of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain Federal land 
to facilitate scientific research supporting Federal space and defense 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, WASATCH-CACHE NATIONAL FOREST, RICH COUNTY, 
              UTAH.

    (a) Land Conveyance Authorized.--Not later than 6 months after the 
date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Agriculture 
shall convey, without consideration, to the Utah State University 
Research Foundation, all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to a parcel of real property consisting of approximately 
80 acres, including improvements thereon, located outside of the 
boundaries of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Rich County, Utah, 
within Sections 19 and 30, in Township 14 North, Range 40 East of the 
Salt Lake Base and Meridian.
    (b) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall 
be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of Agriculture.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of Agriculture 
may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the 
conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate 
to protect the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015231EN.01000201.xml

| 15.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 July 2015

appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency

(2015/C 231/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (1), and in particular Article 79 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that the Council is to appoint as members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency (‘the Management Board’) one representative from each Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that the Council is to appoint as members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency (‘the Management Board’) one representative from each Member State.

| (2) | By its Decision of 13 May 2013 (2), the Council appointed 12 members of the Management Board. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By its Decision of 13 May 2013 (2), the Council appointed 12 members of the Management Board.

2

| (3) | The Dutch Government has informed the Council of its intention to replace the Dutch representative on the Management Board and has submitted a nomination for a new representative, who should be appointed for a period which runs until 31 May 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Dutch Government has informed the Council of its intention to replace the Dutch representative on the Management Board and has submitted a nomination for a new representative, who should be appointed for a period which runs until 31 May 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Hans Albert MEIJER, of Dutch nationality, born on 19 September 1964, shall be appointed member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency, replacing Mr Johannes Karel Barend Henri KWISTHOUT, for the period from 14 July 2015 to 31 May 2017.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2015.

For the Council

The President

P. GRAMEGNA

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 13 May 2013 appointing 12 members of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency (OJ C 138, 17.5.2013, p. 14).

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7698

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRYANT DUBOSE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-207-P)

Submitted: April 28, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant DuBose, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. DuBose, Nos. CR-94-17; CA-97-207-P

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeSite Help

# Server Error

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, July 31, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Index A-Z
          - Site Map
          - What's New On Our Site
          - Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools
          - Special Features
          - Electronic Submittals Application
          - Digital Accessibility Statement
          - Contact the NRC Webmaster
          - Privacy Policy
          - Site Disclaimer
          - For Developers
          - Whistleblower Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, July 31, 2020
*November 9, 1937.*

#### Yule and wife, Respondents, vs. Scheckler and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Kadwit & Lepp*of Kenosha.

For the *respondents: L. E. Vaudreuil*of Kenosha.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
MEETING WITH LICENSEES THAT 

TRANSPORT RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL QUANTITIES OF CONCERN

TO DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTING SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION -

MODIFIED HANDLING AND DRAFT ADDITIONAL SECURITY MEASURES 

AGENDA

REGISTRATION 30 minutes

INTRODUCTIONS AND OPENING REMARKS 30 minutes

 Purpose and Objective for the meeting

 Format and procedures for participation in the meeting

 Background

- NSIR Organization

- Development of Additional Security Mesaures

DISCUSSION: PROTECTING SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION 45 minutes

BREAK 15 minutes

DISCUSSION: ADDITIONAL SECURITY MEASURES 2 hours

CLOSING REMARKS 30 minutes

 Summation of Major Topics

 Next Steps
No. 90-6369.

#### Galloway *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Behavior of PWR Reactor Coolant System Components, Other than Steam Generator Tubes, Under Severe Accident Conditions, Phase I Final Report (NUREG/CR-6792)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6792 (PDF - 1.71 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2002**Date Published:** May 2003

**Prepared by:** S. Majumdar, W. Shack

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

J. D. Page, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code Y6421

**Prepared for**: Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A critical step in the assessment of risk of containment bypass attributable to pressure and temperature-induced failures of steam generator (SG) tubes during severe accidents is the prediction of the sequence in which the SG tubes fail relative to other reactor coolant system (RCS) components. This report summarizes our current understanding of the behavior of coolant system components other than SG tubes during severe accidents in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). A detailed analysis of RCS components during severe accidents reported In NUREG-1570 predicted that the failure times of steam generator tubes, the pressurizer surge line, and hot leg piping are very close. However, the analyses conducted for predicting failure of RCS components were less rigorous and detailed than those for SG tubes. This report reviews the methods used in NUREG-1570 to analyze the behavior of RCS piping, power operated relief valves, safety relief valves, and manway bolted connections during severe accidents and recommends future research and analyses that should be conducted to bring the failure prediction methodology on a par with that followed for SG tubes. This will make possible a more balanced assessment of the potential for containment bypass attributable to SG tube failures.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
LiDAR Drone Services, LLC

Departing Location Protocols

A. PIC: Inform ATC of Completion of Flight Plan if Necessary

B. Final Measure Weather and Check and Mark Pilot’s and Operation’s Log.

a. Wind Direction

b. Wind Velocity

c. Relative Humidity

d. Barometric Pressure

e. Outside Temperature

f. Flight Duration

g. Flight Performance

C. Record Flight Notes, and UAS Performance (energy consumed).

D. Safety Debriefing of Flight and Operations Crews.

E. Breakdown UAS and Place in Travel Safety Case.

F. Crew: Carefully Pack Gear and other location Essentials.

a. Gear Checklist in Each Case

b. Make sure each Case has all equipment

c. Refer to each Case Packaging Slip (PDF located in each Case)

G. Case Checklist

a. Make sure all Cases brought to set are accounted for and Mark on Checklist.

H. After each Operations all Company Team are required to attend a Safety Debriefing.

I. Team Meeting to Discuss Flight what was done correctly and what could have been

better executed.

J. Review All Communications and Discuss Improvements, Failures and Edits for the Next

Flight Operations.

K. Review Company Protocols and Discuss Edits, Changes and or Additions to the Various

Flight and Operations Protocols.

L. Discuss with the Team if the Location Diagram was laid out Properly and could it be

Improved for the Next Project.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Consolidation of the 1985 Sandia National Laboratories/Factory Mutual Main Control Room and Electrical Cabinet Fire Test Data (NUREG-2164)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 03, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002902
<NAME> U-SHIP INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    627,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               744,373
<PP&E>                                       2,032,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                (850,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,107,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          596,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,919
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,424,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,107,486
<SALES>                                        178,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,719
<CGS>                                          181,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               315,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (320,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (320,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (320,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        


</TABLE>