alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Judges at the relation of Willis Rogers *v.*William P. Williams & James Houze,

From Franklin.

Before the act of 1823, a payment of money bjr the Sheriff to the Clerk, and a receipt of it by him *as Clerk,*were within the condition of his official bond, although the payment was made before the return day of the writ upon which the money was made.

Debt upon the official bond of one *Jordan Hill,*given before the act of 1823, *(Taylor’s Eevisal, ch.*1212) as Clerk of the Superior Court of Franklin. The condition of the bond was, “ that tiie said *J. H.*should well and <s truly preserve, and safely keep the records and papers, “ and discharge and perform the duties of his said office.”

The breach assigned, was tiie non payment by *Hill,*of money paid into his office by the Sheriff, upon a writ of *fieri facias,*which issued in favor of the Relator. Upon the trial, it appeared that the payment was made to *Hill*the Saturday before the return day of the writ, and that he gave a receipt for it, which he signed *as Clerk.*

His honor Judge Daktee instructed the Jury, that a payment made to a Clerk in the vacation, was nota payment to him in virtue of his office, and therefore not within the condition of the bond. A verdict being returned for the Defendants, the Relator appealed.

*W. H. Haywood,*for the Appellant.

*Badger,*for the Defendants.

Per Curiam.

A payment to the Clerk under the circumstances stated in this case, was a payment to him in virtue of his office, arid his receipt is direct proof in what character he received it, and how the Sheriff paid it. This is strengthened by the time of payment, and by the execution against the Defendant in the original suit»

Let the judgment be reversed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Re-evaluation of Regulatory Guidance Provided in Regulatory Guides 1.142 and 1.143 (NUREG/CR-5733)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5573 (PDF - 21.51 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1999**Date Published:**August 1999

**Prepared by:** T. M. Adams, J. D. Stevenson, G. G. Thomas, and G. A. Harstead

Stevenson and Associates 9217 Midwest Avenue Cleveland, OH 44125

H. L. Graves III, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC Job Code W6540

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes the technical basis and recommends changes in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) criteria now used in the design of Nuclear Concrete Structures other than Containment and the design of Radioactive Waste Management Systems, Structures and Components. The authors judged that the best method by which the conclusions of this report can be implemented are through the issuance of revisions to existing Regulatory Guides. There have been several developments since the issuance of the last revision of Regulatory Guides 1.142 and 1.143 (1981 and 1979 respectively) which provides guidance for the design of these items. ACI 349, which presents the code requirements for nuclear safety related concrete structures, has had two major revisions since the last issue of the Regulatory Guides. New advanced reactor design concepts have been put forward that include unique design attributes that need to be considered. The Department of Energy (DOE) has been active in writing standards for the design of radioactive waste management systems. There have also been numerous changes to the Code of Federal Regulations since the issuance of Regulatory Guides 1.142 and 1.143. This report discusses these advancements and changes with respect to the scope of the Regulatory Guides and includes detailed recommended changes to Revision I of Regulatory Guide 1.142 and 1.143.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeSite Help

# NRC Site Search: Search All Sites

### Filter by Document Type

News Releases                  - All
                  - Main Website
                  - Public ADAMS
                  - Enforcement Docs
                  - NUREG-Series Reports
                  - News Releases
                  - Commission Docs
                  - Meetings
                  - Inspection Manual
                  - Inspection Reports
                  - Glossary
                  - Maps & Images
                  - Regulatory Guides
                  - IG Reports
                  - Regulations
                  - Event Reports

### Sort Documents by

Sort by                  - Relevance
                  - Date

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 28, 2023

#### Related Information

                - ADAMS Fielded Search
                - Licensee Event Reports
                - NRC Telephone Directory

Section Navigation

#### Site Help

          - Search All Sites
          - Main Site
          - News Releases
          - Public Documents (ADAMS)
          - Agency Correspondence
          - Commission Documents
          - Commission Papers
          - Commission Speeches
          - Contracts
          - Enforcement
          - Event Reports
          - Facility Locator
          - FOIA
          - Generic Communications
          - Glossary
          - Images
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Reports
          - NSTS Blog
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - Reactor Oversight
          - Regulations (10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Report (NUREG-1935)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Resources Group, L.T.D. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard
Dunning, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: November 18, 2008                    By: /s/ Richard Dunning
                                                -------------------
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                Advanced Resources Group, L.T.D.
Beadle, McBride, Evans & Reeves, LLP
accountants and consultants

2285 Renaissance Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Tel: (702) 597-0010
Fax: (702) 597-2767
www.bmercpa.com

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We  consent  to the inclusion therein of our report dated August 9, 2006 in the
Annual Report  on  Form  10-KSB  under  the  Securities  Exhange Act of 1934 of
Prevention  Insurance.  Com  ,  with  respect  to the financial  statements  of
prevention Insurance.com as of April 30, 2006, and for the year ended April 30,
2006.

Beadle McBride Evans & Reeves LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
August 30, 2007
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Secure Network Design (NUREG/CR-7117, SAND2010-8222P)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7117 (PDF - 2.32 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2012**Date Published:**June 2012

**Prepared by:** John T. Michalski and Francis J. Wyant Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico

Paul Rebstock, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code N6116

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes elements of a secure digital nuclear power plant data network (NPPDN). These elements support the task of ensuring network security associated with the design, operation, and protection of the NPPDN. This report provides technical criteria concerning the features contributing to secure network designs at nuclear power plants. Regulatory guidance concerning the design and review of digital systems is provided in a variety of other resources, including Regulatory Guide (RG) 5.71, RG 1.152, DI&C-ISG-04, and Chapter 7 of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800). The objective of this NUREG is not to consolidate or further explain that guidance, or to create new guidance, but rather to address technical considerations at the next level of detail. Although it does not supply explicit implementation guidance for 10 CFR 73.54, it will provide the reader information concerning criteria for supporting protection against cyber threats.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 3, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                  8,629
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          56,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,993
<INVENTORY>                                            82,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      159,857
<PP&E>                                                 31,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                         12,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        296,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  61,503
<BONDS>                                                   514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  341
<OTHER-SE>                                            225,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          296,259
<SALES>                                               125,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      125,115
<CGS>                                                  79,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          79,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       17,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (9,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (3,535)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (5,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (5,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                               HINES HORTICULTURE
                            CERTIFCATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ferguson, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                            By: /s/ Robert A. Ferguson
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Robert A. Ferguson
                                                CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                                                (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

April 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
A B C

Total (thousand tons) 493,159 509,000 518,500 5.14% 1.87%

Sugar (thousand ton) 31,304 33,100 32,700 4.46% -1.21%

Anhydrous ethanol (million liters) 7,466 6,950 8,300 11.17% 19.42%

Hydrous ethanol (million liters) 13,076 14,536 12,750 -2.50% -12.29%

Total ethanol (million liters) 20,542 21,486 21,050 2.47% -2.03%

TRS (thousand tons) 67,830 71,260 70,207 3.50% -1.48%

Kg of TRS / ton of sugarcane 137.54 140.0 135.40 -1.55% -3.28%

sugar1 48.44% 48.75% 48.88%

ethanol2 51.56% 51.25% 51.12%

Sugar available for exports (thousand tons) 22,119 24,000 23,500 6.24% -2.08%

Ethanol exports (million liters) 1,768 1,700 2,550 44.23% 50.00%

Source: UNICA. Note: TRS ist acronym used to "Total Recoverable Sugars"; 1sugarcane used to sugar production; 2 sugarcane used to ethanol production. Data of 2011/2012 harvest season are

final values. The 1st estimate for the 2012/2013 sugarcane harvest season was released on April 12, 2012; the 1st review was released on September 20 of that year.

SUGARCANE QUALITY

SUGAR & ETHANOL PRODUCTION SHARE

Share (%)

MARKET

1

st review 

2012/2013

PRODUCTION

Products

ESTIMATE FOR 2012/2013 SUGARCANE HARVEST OF BRAZILIAN SOUTH-CENTRAL REGION

2011/2012 

harvest season

1

st estimate 

2012/2013

SUGARCANE CRUSHING

Variation (%)

C/A C/B
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Issue 57: Effects of Fire Protection System Actuation on Safety-Related Equipment (NUREG-1472)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1472 (PDF - 2.62 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 1993**Date Published:**October 1993

H.W. Woods

Division of Safety Issue Resolution Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Actuation of Fire Protection Systems (FPS) in Nuclear Power Plants have resulted in adverse interactions with equipment important to safety. Precursor operational experience has shown that 37% of all FPS actuations damaged some equipment, and 20% of all FPS actuations have resulted in a plant transient and reactor trip. On an average, 0.17 FPS actuations per reactor year have been experienced in nuclear power plants in this country. This report presents the regulatory analysis for GI-57, "Effects of Fire Protection System Actuation on Safety-Related Equipment". The risk reduction estimates, cost/benefit analyses, and other insights gained during this effort have shown that implementation of the recommendations contained in this report can significantly reduce risk, and that these improvements can be warranted in accordance with the backfit rule, 10 CFR 50.109(a)(3). However, plant specific analyses are required in order to identify such improvements. Generic analyses can not serve to identify improvements that could be warranted for individual, specific plants. Plant specific analyses of the type needed for this purpose are underway as part of the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,489
<PP&E>                                           5,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,032
<SALES>                                         18,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,095
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (525)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (203)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2016025DE.01006902.xml

| 2.2.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 25/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 25/69

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses (EU) 2015/2119 der Kommission vom 20. November 2015 über Schlussfolgerungen zu den besten verfügbaren Techniken (BVT) gemäß der Richtlinie 2010/75/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Holzwerkstofferzeugung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 306 vom 24. November 2015
  )

Seite 31, Titel:

Anstatt:

„... über Schlussfolgerungen zu den besten verfügbaren Techniken (BVT) gemäß der Richtlinie 2010/75/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Holzwerkstofferzeugung“

muss es heißen:

„... über Schlussfolgerungen zu den besten verfügbaren Techniken (BVT) gemäß der Richtlinie 2010/75/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Herstellung von Platten auf Holzbasis“.

Seite 46, BVT 20, „Anwendbarkeit“:

Anstatt:

„Aus Sicherheitsgründen ist ein Gewebefilter oder ein Zyklofilter nicht anwendbar, wenn Altholz als Rohstoff verwendet wird.“

muss es heißen:

„Wenn Altholz als Rohstoff verwendet wird, können Sicherheitsgründe dazu führen, dass Gewebefilter oder Zyklofilter nicht anwendbar sind.“

---
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Cohoat,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

|        | /s/   Matthew A. Cohoat |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|        | Matthew A. Cohoat                 |   |
|   | Executive Vice President and      |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer of the    |   |
|   | General Partner                   |   |
|   | Date: August 14, 2006        |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retainedby Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.02
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented therein.
 Date: November 14, 2006
    /s/ Robert R FreemanRobert FreemanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)