alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD A. JOSEPHER, JACK L. LEONE and ERIK WEISS,

Appellants,

v.

THE MARBELLA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-787

[December 15, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CA009103.

Richard A. Josepher of Gutter Chaves Josepher Rubin Forman Fleisher 

Miller, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Henry B. Handler and William J. Cornell of Weiss, Handler & Cornwell, 

P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# L_2015332EN.01015801.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/158

---

Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2015/1938 of the European Central Bank of 27 August 2015 amending Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2015/27)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 28 October 2015
  )

On page 45, point 12, Article 107a, paragraph 4:

for:

‘4.   The DECC issuer shall be an SPV established in a Member State whose currency is the euro. Parties to the transaction, other than the issuer, the debtors of the underlying credit claims, and the originator, shall be established in the EEA.’,

read:

‘4.   The DECC issuer shall be a special purpose entity established in a Member State whose currency is the euro. Parties to the transaction, other than the issuer, the debtors of the underlying credit claims, and the originator, shall be established in the EEA.’.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50376

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS BRIONEZ-VILLELA, also known as Jesus Villela-Villela

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:03-CR-34-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Brionez-Villela has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brionez-Villela has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.R. MCFARLANE, K.J BRUBAKER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RYAN C. AHLERSMEYER

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400333

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 13 May 2014.

Military Judge: LtCol E.H. Robinson, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, III Marine 

Expeditionary Force, Okinawa, Japan.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Col K.J. Estes, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Charles D. Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: LT Amy Freyermuth, JAGC, USN.

29 January 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
No: 19-024 May 17, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Amends Licensing, Inspection, Annual Fees for FY 2019

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations to reflect the licensing, 

inspection, special project, and annual fees it will charge applicants and licensees for fiscal year

2019.

The final fee rule, published today in the Federal Register, includes fees required by law for 

the NRC to recover approximately 90 percent of the agency’s annual budget authority. A proposed 

rule was published Jan. 31 for public comment.

For FY 2019, the NRC’s required fee recovery amount, after accounting for fee-recovery 

exclusions, fee-relief activities, and net billing adjustments, is $782.5 million. Approximately 

$252.1 million will be recovered through fees for service under Part 170 of Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations, and approximately $530.5 million will be recovered through annual fees under 

10 CFR Part 171.

Compared to FY 2018, the FY 2019 annual fees will increase for operating reactors, 

research and test reactors, and some materials users. Annual fees will decrease for spent fuel

storage/reactor decommissioning, fuel facilities, select materials users, the Department of Energy 

transportation activities, and the DOE Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Program. The 

annual fee for the non-DOE uranium recovery licensee remains unchanged.

The final fee rule also includes several other changes affecting licensees and applicants. 

First, the NRC has increased the hourly rate from $275 in FY 2018 to $278 for FY 2019. Second, 

the NRC has revised the flat rate license application fees under 10 CFR 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect 

the new hourly rate. Finally, the final fee rule includes two fee-policy changes and one 

administrative change.

The NRC estimates that the FY 2019 annual fees will be paid by the licensees of 98 

operating commercial power reactors, four research and test reactors, 122 spent nuclear fuel storage 

and decommissioning reactor facilities, seven fuel cycle facilities, one uranium recovery facility,

and approximately 2,600 nuclear materials licensees.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Prevention Insurance.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan P. Donenfeld, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








August 5, 2010
By:
/s/ ALAN P. DONENFELDAlan P. DonenfeldPresident and Director

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.6

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven G. Stewart
-------------------------
Steven G. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Headwaters and will be retained by Headwaters and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Davis, Trustee in bankruptcy, Respondent, vs. Gale, Appellant.

*March 8*

April *5, 1932.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *A. T. Twesme*of Galesville and *John C. Gaveney*of Arcadia, attorneys, and *H. L. Ekern*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Twesme.*

*W. S, Wadleigh*of Galesville, for the respondent.

Fowler, J.

This case is ruled by the opinion in *Davis Mill & Electric Co. v. Gale,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 513, 242 N. W. 162).

*By the Court.*— -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
i 

## Residential Furnaces and Boilers



# E lect r i c it y Con s umption James E. McMahon (JEMcMahon@LBL.gov) Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

### U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards for Residential Furnaces and Boilers

July 17, 2001

## Electricity Consumption of

` 

# R e 

# s i 

# dent i 

# al Fu

## rn 

## ace s a

## nd Boilers

• Currently, only gas/oil consumption is regulated for gas/oil furnaces and boilers. However, - electricity consumption is significant - technologically feasible options exist 

### • DOE proposes to consider the electricity consumption in this rulemaking • Issues - need an indicator of electricity consumption - need to consider cooling impacts
1

## Need an Indicator of Electricity Consumption

• The indicator can be possibly based on the Average Annual Auxiliary Electrical Energy Consumption (EAE) 

### • Advantages - covered within existing test procedure - industry familiarity 

### • Need to address - variation with burner capacity - variation with circulating fan capacity
2

## Need to Consider Cooling Impacts

• Efficiency gain on circulating fan will also provide electricity savings during the cooling season. - same blower and motor used by air conditioner as for furnace. - life cycle cost analysis computes this benefit.

3

## DOE Requests Input from Stakeholders Current stand ards for residential furnaces and boilers are b as ed on the AFU E only. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of supplementing it with an electricity consumption indicator in this rulemaking? The Department is seeking comment on the most appropriate method to regulate this electricity use. The Department is seeking comments on the best approaches to add

ress the cooling-side impacts.

4

## Backup Slides

57-71T-77-7"'171- 7 

## Electricity Consumption is Significant Residential Furnaces • Per household - Average EAE = 849 kWh/yr • For nation 

### - 56 M households w/ furnaces x 849 kWh/yr - = 47.6 TWh/yr

6

## Technologically Feasible Options Exist Residential Furnaces Tec hnology Efficiency OEM cost Power (W) (1993) P S C motor Forward curve d blades 7% -$75 -700W EC M D C motor B ackwar d curved b lades 30% -$200 -165W Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation , Efficient and Effective Residential Air Handling Devices, March 1993
OMB Control Number: 3170-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/XXXX

Page 1

Instrument 3A: Case Manager Training Pre-Test

Respondents: Case Managers

Collection Strategy: Paper Form

Thank you for completing this survey as part of our evaluation of training on the FET Toolkit. 

Please note that your responses will be kept confidential, and when survey results are reported 

none of your answers will be connected to your organization.

Your organization/agency: ______________________________________

How confident are you in your ability to...

Very 

Confident Confident Somewhat Confident

Not at All 

Confident

Understand core financial management 

topics, such as budgeting, saving, and 

setting financial goals?

   

Discuss core financial management topics 

with your clients?    

Assess your clients’ financial condition or 

situation?    

Get help if you or your clients have 

questions about financial issues?    

Refer clients to community resources such 

as credit-debt counseling and tax filing 

assistance?

   

Know where to go for unbiased information 

or help in working with clients?    

Help clients manage their financial 

challenges?    

Provide the right financial content at the 

right time in the context of your case work 

with clients?

   

Access and use tools and materials from the 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

(CFPB) through its consumer website?

   
OMB Control Number: 3170-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/XXXX

Page 2

Paperwork Reduction Act

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3170-XXXX. It expires on MM/DD/YYYY. The 

time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average approximately 5 

minutes per response, including the time for reviewing any instructions, searching existing data 

sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. The obligation to respond to this collection of information is voluntary. Comments 

regarding this collection of information, including the estimated response time, suggestions for 

improving the usefulness of the information, or suggestions for reducing the burden to respond to 

this collection should be submitted to Bureau at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 

(Attention: PRA Office), 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552, or by email to 

CFPB_Public_PRA@cfpb.gov.

The Bureau will not disclose any personally identifiable information collected except to the extent 

that it is required to do so by law and as provided in the Privacy Act Statement listed below. 

Additionally, the Bureau will treat the information collected consistent with its confidentiality 

regulations at 12 C.F.R. Part 1070, et seq.
# L_2015154EN.01001401.xml

| 19.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/947

of 15 June 2015

appointing two Portuguese members and one Portuguese alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Portuguese government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January and on 5 February 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1) and (EU) 2015/190 (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January and on 5 February 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1) and (EU) 2015/190 (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

1

2

| (2) | Two members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Alberto João CARDOSO GONÇALVES JARDIM and Mr António Luís DOS SANTOS DA COSTA. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Alberto João CARDOSO GONÇALVES JARDIM and Mr António Luís DOS SANTOS DA COSTA.

| (3) | One alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr João CUNHA E SILVA, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

One alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr João CUNHA E SILVA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Mr Miguel Filipe MACHADO DE ALBUQUERQUE, Presidente do Governo Regional da Madeira, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Mr Miguel Filipe MACHADO DE ALBUQUERQUE, Presidente do Governo Regional da Madeira,

Presidente do Governo Regional da Madeira

| — | Mr Fernando MEDINA, Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa; |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Fernando MEDINA, Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa;

Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Mário Sérgio Quaresma GONÇALVES MARQUES, Secretário Regional dos Assuntos Parlamentares e Europeus da Madeira. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Mário Sérgio Quaresma GONÇALVES MARQUES, Secretário Regional dos Assuntos Parlamentares e Europeus da Madeira.

Secretário Regional dos Assuntos Parlamentares e Europeus da Madeira.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 June 2015.

For the Council

The President

K. GERHARDS

---

(1)  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

---
#### In the Matter of Darren L. Patterson, Petitioner, v Joseph G. Golia, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 534]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, *inter alia,*to compel a hearing on the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 30.30.

Motion by the respondent Joseph G. Golia to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 220 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2008



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName: Shou-Kang ChenTitle:   Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Uncertainty Analysis for Maanshan LBLOCA by TRACE and DAKOTA (NUREG/IA-0448)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0448 (PDF - 2.29 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2014**Date Published:** July 2014

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Jung-Hua Yang*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, Taiwan

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., HsinChu, Taiwan

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This research is focused on the Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident (LBLOCA) analysis of the Maanshan power plant by TRACE-DAKOTA code. In the acceptance criteria for Loss of Coolant Accidents (LOCAs), there are two accepted analysis methods: conservative methodology and best estimate methodology. Compared with conservative methodology, the best estimate and realistic input data with uncertainties to quantify the limiting values i.e., Peak Cladding Temperature (PCT) for LOCAs analysis. By the conservative methodology, the PCTCM (PCT calculated by conservative methodology) of Maanshan power plant LBLOCA calculated is 1228.7K. On the other hand, there are five initial conditions taken into account in the uncertainty analysis in this study. In PCT95/95 (PCT of 95/95 confidence level and probability) calculation, the PCT95/95 is 1131.1K lower than the PCTCM (1228.7K). In addition, the partial rank correlation coefficients between input parameters and PCT indicate that accumulator temperature is the most sensitive parameter in this study.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                       163
<INVENTORY>                                      7,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,103
<PP&E>                                          48,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,272
<BONDS>                                         17,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              533
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,436
<SALES>                                         38,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,327
<CGS>                                           33,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (370)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (545)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>