alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# History

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About NRCS 
-  History 

          -  About NRCS               -  Careers 
            -  Civil Rights  
            -  Farm Bill 
            -  History 
            -  Leadership 
            -  Partner With Us 
            -  Priorities 
            -  NRCS Strategic Plan 

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) draws on a long history of helping people help the land. For more than 80 years, NRCS and its predecessor agencies have worked in close partnerships with farmers and ranchers, local and state governments, and other federal agencies to maintain health

## A Brief History of NRCS

On April 27, 1935 Congress passed Public Law 74-46, in which it recognized that "the wastage of soil and moisture resources on farm, grazing, and forest lands . . .  is a menace to the national welfare" and established the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) as a permanent agency in the USDA. In 1994, SCS’s name was changed to the Natural Resources Conservation Service to better reflect the broadened scope of the agency’s concerns. In doing so, Congress reaffirmed the federal commitment to the conservation of the nation's soil and water resources, first made more than 80 years ago, that continues to this day. Read more about the history of NRCS. 

## NRCS History Publications

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Soil Conservation Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service have issued a number publications on the origins and development of soil and water conservation over the years. Many of these publications along with significant primary documents are being made available online for use as a public resource. See a complete list of these publications.

## NRCS on PBS' "The Dust Bowl"

During the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, we were called the Soil Conservation Service. Our mission was to help farmers take better care of their land. Filmmaker Ken Burns' portrays the early days of NRCS in his documentary "The Dust Bowl." Learn more about the documentary.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Morris Business Development Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 14, 2010





/s/ George Morris


George Morris


Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Morris Business Development Company and will be retained by Morris Business Development Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert Krebs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc.

Date:  March 31, 2005

                                        By:/s/ Robert Krebs
                                        --------------------------
                                               Robert Krebs
                                               Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 6/30/98 and Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the quarter ended 6/30/98 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,591
<SECURITIES>                                     9,659
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                       387
<INVENTORY>                                         68
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,344
<PP&E>                                          17,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,777
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,390
<SALES>                                          3,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,211
<CGS>                                              622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2015165EN.01000201.xml

| 20.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 May 2015

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2015/C 165/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employees' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member's seat is available for Germany on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees' representatives, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat is available for Germany on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees' representatives,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

| GERMANY | Mr Mario PATUZZI |
| --- | --- |

GERMANY

Mr Mario PATUZZI

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. DŪKLAVS

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNMSS Procedures

# NMSS Administrative Support (AD) Procedures

**Note:** The Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) merged with NMSS on October 5, 2014. All previously issued FSME and Office of State and Tribal Program (STP) procedures are considered effectively NMSS procedures and remain in effect until they are reviewed and reissued. These procedures can be referenced as NMSS procedures even though the procedures still have FSME or STP titles and references.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, February 27, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Background Procedures
          - State Agreement Procedures
          - State Liaison Procedures
          - Administrative Support Procedures
          - Temporary Instructions
          - Tribal Procedures
          - Management Directives (select)
          - Rescinded Procedures

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, February 27, 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31012

 

BRANDON HAYNES

Petitioner-Appellee

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

Respondent-Appellant

- - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

- - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 27, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, _____F.3d____)

(March 4, 2002)

BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES,

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. 

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.
No. 86-949.

#### Argus Inc. et al. *v.*Eastman Kodak Co.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2019072EN.01014101.xml

| 14.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/141 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/141

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1480 of 28 August 2015 amending several annexes to Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules concerning reference methods, data validation and location of sampling points for the assessment of ambient air quality

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 226 of 29 August 2015
  )

On page 10, in Annex II, in point (3)(a), in the amendments to Section A of Annex VI to Directive 2008/50/EC:

for:

‘3.   Reference method for the sampling and measurement of lead — unchanged’

read:

‘3.   Reference method for the sampling and measurement of lead

The reference method for the sampling of lead is that described in Section A(4) of this Annex. The reference method for the measurement of lead is that described in EN 14902:2005 “Standard method for measurement of Pb/Cd/As/Ni in the PM10 fraction of suspended particulate matter”.’

On page 11, in Annex II, in point (3)(a), in the amendments to Section A of Annex VI to Directive 2008/50/EC:

for:

‘6.   Reference method for the sampling and measurement of benzene — unchanged’

read:

‘6.   Reference method for the sampling and measurement of benzene

The reference method for the measurement of benzene is that described in EN 14662:2005, parts 1, 2 and 3 “Ambient air quality — Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations”.’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                       399
<INVENTORY>                                     10,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,501
<PP&E>                                          45,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,568
<SALES>                                         37,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,082
<CGS>                                           23,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,966
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<FN>
<DEBT OBLIGATIONS, NET OF CURRENT>              13,267
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Confirmatory Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis To Support Specific Success Criteria in the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models–Duane Arnold (NUREG-2236)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Pledge Letter



 Exhibit 4.1.5 
 [TO BE PLACED ON DRIVETIME LETTERHEAD] 
 August 2, 2010 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 

      as Trustee and Collateral Agent 
 45 Broadway, 14th Floor 
 New York, New York 10006 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 This
letter is being delivered pursuant to Section 1 of that certain Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2010 (the “Pledge Agreement”), between DT Acceptance Corporation, an Arizona Corporation (the
“Pledgor”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee collateral agent (in such capacity, the “Collateral Agent”) for the Secured Parties set forth therein, securing the obligations set forth in that
certain Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2010, among the Pledgor and DriveTime Automotive Group, Inc., as Issuers, the guarantors named therein and the Collateral Agent. All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Pledge Agreement. 
 Pursuant to Section 1 of the Pledge Agreement Pledgor hereby delivers
the revised Schedule 1 to the Pledge Agreement which includes the uncertificated Pledged Interests of DT Warehouse IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Pursuant to the Pledge Agreement, the attached Schedule I shall supersede any prior
schedules so delivered. 
  

			
	 DT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
 an Arizona corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ Steven P. Johnson
		 	Steven P. Johnson, President









 Schedule I 
 CAPITAL STOCK OR OTHER EQUITY INTERESTS 
  

																	
	 Issuer
	  	Number of
Certificate	 	  	Registered Owner	 	  	Number and
Class of Shares or
Other Equity
Interests	 	  	Percentage of
Shares or
Other Equity
Interests	 
	 DT Receivables Company 7 A, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Receivables Company 8A, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Receivables Company 9-1, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Receivables Company 9B, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Warehouse, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Warehouse II, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Warehouse III, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	% 
	 DT Warehouse IV, LLC
	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	DTAC	  	  	 	N/A	  	  	 	100	%
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Extremely Low Probability of Rupture Version 2 Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Code (NUREG-2247)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2247 (PDF – 14.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2021**Date Published:** August 2021

**Prepared by:**Matthew Homiack, Giovanni Facco, Michael Benson,Marjorie Erickson, and Craig HarringtonMatthew Homiack, NRC Project ManagerOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

xLPR Version 2 is a probabilistic fracture mechanics code for piping applications. The code was developed jointly by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). They engaged in a multiyear code development effort that built on the results of a successful pilot study. The code, which was designed, programmed, and tested under a rigorous software quality assurance program, provides regulators, industry, researchers, and the public with new quantitative capabilities to analyze the risks associated with nuclear power plant piping systems subject to active degradation mechanisms. Core capabilities of the code include modeling fatigue, stress-corrosion cracking, inservice inspection, chemical and mechanical mitigation, leak rates, and seismic effects. This report outlines how the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and EPRI approached code development. It describes the basic design and operation of the software and the underlying models and theory. Results from verification and validation testing and independent reviews are provided. The report also covers sample code inputs and analysis results and provides recommendations for future development.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, September 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Licensed Fuel Facility Status Report —Inventory Difference Data: July 1, 2001 – June 30, 2002 (NUREG-0430)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Table of Contents 
        - Abstract

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2003**Date Published:**October 2003

**Prepared by:** T. Pham

Division of Nuclear Security Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Table of Contents

        Abstract
        Abbreviations/Acronyms
        1. Introduction
        2. Discussion
        3. Conclusion
        4. Definition of Terms
        5. Tabulation of Inventory Differences 

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is committed to an annual publication of licensed fuel cycle facility inventory difference data, following Agency review of the information and completion of any related investigations. Information in this report includes inventory difference results for active fuel fabrication facilities possessing more than one effective kilogram of special nuclear material.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
SFUND RECORDS CTR

2150006

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

February 20, 2008

Oliver Muenz

Vice President of Finance

Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc.

10590 W. Ocean Air Drive, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92130

Larry Lapuyade

LFR

1900 Powell Street, 12th Floor

Emeryville, CA 94608-1814

RE: Approval of Remedial Design

Sola Optical Superfund Site

Dear Mr. Muenz and Mr. Lapuyade:

In March 2007, EPA issued a Record of Decision Amendment ("ROD Amendment") for

the Sola Optical USA, Inc. Superfund site in Petaluma, California. The ROD

Amendment selected Monitored Natural Attenuation as the remedy for cleaning-up the

remaining groundwater contamination at the site, in addition to institutional controls to

restrict groundwater use until clean-up goals are achieved. This letter serves as approval

of the remedial design for these actions. EPA considers the letter from LFR to Dante

Rodriguez, U.S. EPA, dated June 7, 2007, to constitute the design document for the

selected remedial action.

The referenced letter specifies the single well that will continue to be monitored. This

monitoring constitutes the only action that is required at this time for the implementation

of the remedial action. This action is currently underway. It should be noted, however,

as mentioned in my previous letter to you dated September 27, 2007, that EPA anticipates

you playing a role and possibly becoming financially involved in the negotiation and

implementation of the institutional controls selected in the ROD Amendment. EPA will

notify you in the near future about your role as implementation of the institutional

controls commences.
Thank you very much for your efforts at the Sola Optical USA, Inc. Superfund site. If

you have M^lmirnediate questions, please contact me at (415) 972-3166, or via email at

rodriguez.dante@epa.gov.

Sincerely,

Dante Rodriguez, P.E.

Sola Optical Project Manager

U.S. EPA Region 9
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 20, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 20, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0083. WARREN J. EVANS, JR. v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CR0299