alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State *v.*Roberts.

Indictments containing’ three counts, the first of which the Court had no cognizance of. To ■subnet on the first count l_the others not to be const fered) would oust the Court of jurisdiction. Submission cannot be made upon one count without all, unless *notpros,*is entered as to the other counts. Upon assaults with intent to kill, the Court may punish by fine only.

He was indicted for an assault and battery, stated in three counts: in the first, for a common assault and bat-*202(ei.y . |n the second, for an assault with intent to kill ail<j mlirder; in the third, for an assault and wounding with intent to kill and murder. *Gen. Davie*for the Defendant, upon an agreement between him and the Solici-for-General, offered to submit upon the first count, and the other counts should not be considered at all. *Per curiam,*if he submits upon that only the court cannot take any notice of the offence, being ousted of original jurisdiction by the act of 1790, *ch. 3. sec.*8. which directs, “that all indictments for assaults, batteries and pe-tit larcenies, shall in future originate in the county courts of pleas and quarter-sessions only.” These words are equivalent to express negative words, which it'is said are necessary to oust this court of jurisdiction, and the Defendant cannot by Ms admission give to the court cogr nizanre of an offence which by law they have no cognizance of, any more than a prisoner indicted for a capital felony, could by his admission give authority to a county court to pass sentence upon him. Neither can there be a submission for part of the indictment only — he must submit as to all the counts in the indictment if he submits at all, unless the Solicitor-General will enter a *noli pro~ sequi*as to some. *Et per curiam,*this court are not obliged to imprison upon a conviction for an assault with intent to kilt — they may inflict imprisonment, the pillory and a fine, but they may inflict some or one of them only. 4 *Bl. Com.*217, means only that, the court have a discretionary power of inflicting the punishments there mentioned, not that they are obliged to inflict all of them. He submitted, and the witnesses for the State were examined, and the court fined him only.

Note. — That the consent or admissions of parties cannot give a Court jurisdiction. *See Waggoner v. Grove, Gonf. Rep.*516.
Exhibit 32.1

 

KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLCCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: March 4, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard D.    Kinder                                                            |
|----------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |  | Richard D. Kinder    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer      and President |

----

----
#### Loehr, Appellant, vs. Crocker and another, Respondents.

*November 10*

December *7, 1926.*

Companion case to *Loehr v. Crocker, ante,*p. 422.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Mani-towoc county: Michael Kirwan, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Reilly & O’Brien*of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by *J. E. O’Brien.*

For the respondents there were briefs by *Hougen & Brady*of Manitowoc, and oral argument by *A. L.- Hougen.*

Owen, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between the automobile of her cousin, Louis Loehr, in which she was riding, and a passenger bus owned by the defend*430ants. From a judgment dismissing her complaint plaintiff appeals. This is a companion case to that of *Loehr v. Crocker, ante,*p. 422, 211 N. W. 299. In that case it was decided that the evidence disclosed no actionable negligence on the part of the defendants, and the plaintiff was denied a recovery. The decision in that case controls this, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A182
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice 
and Procedure.

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: April 20-21, 2015.

TIME:  8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, The 
Richard H. Chambers Courthouse, 125 South Grand Avenue, Pasadena, 
California 91105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Rules Committee 
Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 23, 2015.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Rules Committee Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01560 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Dennis
Harkins, President and Chief Financial Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the ”Company”),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K/A of the
Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (“the Company Form 10- K”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the Company Form 10- K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Dennis Harkins
                    
                    April
      30, 2010Dennis
      Harkins – President and Chief Financial Officer
                    
                    Date
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# GSI-191: The Impact of Debris Induced Loss of ECCS Recirculation on PWR Core Damage Frequency (NUREG/CR-6771)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6771 (PDF - 6.58 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2001**Date Published:** August 2002

**Prepared by:** J. L. Darby, W. Thomas,* D. V. Rao B. C. Letellier, S. G. Ashbaugh, M. T. Leonard**

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545

**Subcontractors:** *ARES Corporation  851 University Blvd. S.E.  Albuquerque, NM 87106

**dycoda LLC  70 Andres Sanchez Road  Belen, NM 87002

M. L. Marshall, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6041

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents a risk significance study that supported a parametric evaluation of operating U. S. pressurized water reactors (PWR) plants to access whether or not Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) recirculation sump failure is a plausible concern. This evaluation was part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic-SafetyIssue (GSI) 191 study tasked to determine if the transport and accumulation of debris in a containment following a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) will impede the operation of the ECCS in operating PWRs. The parametric evaluation identified a range of conditions in which PWR ECCS could fail in the recirculation mode of operation. These conditions stem from the destruction and transport of piping insulation materials, containment surface coatings (paint), and particulate matter (e.g., dirt) by the steam/water jet emerging from a postulated break in reactor coolant piping. The likelihood that sufficient quantities could transport and accumulate on the recirculation sump screen to severely impede recirculation flow is plant specific and a review of PWR plant design features indicated adverse conditions exist in several plants.

The specific goal of the risk significance study was to estimate the amount by which the core damage frequency (CDF) would increase if failure of PWR ECCS recirculation cooling due to debris accumulation on the sump screen were accounted for in a manner that reflects the results of recent experimental and analytical work. Further, the estimate was made in a manner that reflected the total population of U. S. PWR plants. Results suggest the conditional probability of recirculation sump failure (given a demand for recirculation cooling) is sufficiently high at many U. S. plants to cause an increase in the total CDF of an order of magnitude or more.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 86-903.

#### Zartuche *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow certain biodiesel 

and alternative fuel tax credits for fuels derived from animal fats. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2017 

Mr. WEBER of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow 

certain biodiesel and alternative fuel tax credits for fuels 

derived from animal fats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Animal Fat Tax 

5 Credits Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF BIODIESEL AND ALTERNATIVE 

7 FUEL CREDITS FOR FUELS DERIVED FROM 

8 ANIMAL FATS. 

9 (a) BIODIESEL FUELS CREDIT.— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1866 IH

1 (1) DEFINITION OF BIODIESEL.—Section 

2 40A(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘or animal’’. 

4 (2) DEFINITION OF AGRI-BIODIESEL.—Section 

5 40A(d)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘, 

6 and from animal fats’’. 

7 (3) DEFINITION OF RENEWABLE DIESEL.—Sec8 tion 40A(f)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting 

9 ‘‘(other than animal fats)’’ after ‘‘biomass’’. 

10 (b) ALTERNATIVE FUEL MIXTURES CREDIT.—The 

11 last sentence of subsection (d)(2) of section 6426 of such 

12 Code is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘or any’’ and inserting ‘‘any’’; 

14 and 

15 (2) by inserting before the period at the end ‘‘, 

16 or any fuel derived from animal fats’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply with respect to fuel sold or used 

19 after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 13.2.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Meridian
Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John YC Myung, Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/John YC
MyungName: Myung, John YC Title: CFO, Director Date: August
12, 2010

---
#### Granville F. Fish, alias Granville Fish, Pro Ami, *vs.*Walter E. Frye.

Androscoggin County.

Decided March 16, 1922.

*Tascus Atwood,*for plaintiff.

*Pulsifer & Ludden,*for defendant.

This is an action for malicious prosecution, tried in the Superior Court for the County of' Androscoggin. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-seven dollars and fifty cents. The case is before the court on the defendant’s general motion.

After a very careful examination of the evidence, we are unable to conclude that the verdict is manifestly wrong. The entry will be. Motion overruled.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Essential Elements of an Electric Cable ConditionMonitoring Program (NUREG/CR-7000, BNL-NUREG-90318-2009)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7000 (PDF - 7.02 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2009**Date Published:** January 2010

**Prepared by:** M. Villaran and R. Lofaro

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

S. Aggarwal and D. Murdock, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code N6744

Availability Notice

## Abstract

For more than 20 years the NRC has sponsored research studying the aging degradation, condition monitoring and environmental qualification, and testing practices for electric cables and cable accessories used in nuclear power plants. The essential elements for an effective cable condition monitoring program presented in this report are based upon the results of the NRC’s electric cable and equipment research programs, industry guidance and standards, and the experience and observations of others who have studied or conducted electric cable condition monitoring and qualification testing. The program methodology presented herein provides guidance on the selection of cables to be included in the program, characterization and monitoring of cable operating environments and stressors, selection of the most effective and practical condition monitoring techniques, documentation and review of cable condition monitoring testing and inspection results, and the periodic review and assessment of cable condition and operating environments.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
        the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1996
        and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months
        ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
        reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                               21,832
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         6,246
<ALLOWANCES>                            196
<INVENTORY>                           2,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     31,990
<PP&E>                                5,571
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       33,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 7,730
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  9
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           26,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         33,835
<SALES>                              21,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     21,965
<CGS>                                 8,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         8,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (686)
<INCOME-TAX>                            394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (292)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

          - 50 CFR Part 17
          - [Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2013-0056; FXES11130900000-156-FF09E42000]
          - RIN 1018-AY46

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, published a final rule in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 16, 2015, that revises the regulations for the nonessential experimental population of the Mexican wolf (                        *Canis lupus baileyi*). In that rule, we made an error in our description of Phase 2 by stating that dispersal and occupancy of Mexican wolves west of Interstate 17 will be limited to the area west of Highway 89 in Arizona. We intended to state that dispersal and occupancy of Mexican wolves west of Interstate 17 will be limited to the area east of Highway 89. With this document, we correct our error.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective February 17, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sherry Barrett, (505) 761-4704.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a final rule that published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 16, 2015, at 80 FR 2512, the following correction is made:                

§ 17.84 

1. On page 2564, in the third column, the fourth sentence of § 17.84(k)(9)(iv)(B) is amended by removing the words “west of Highway 89” and adding in their place the words “east of Highway 89.” 

Dated: January 26, 2015.

Signed:

Tina A. Campbell,

Chief, Division of Policy and Directives Management.

[FR Doc. 2015-01687 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT FENNELL,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 44 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Extraordinary Relief 

is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                      Subsidiaries of Mykrolis Corporation

<PAGE>


    Name of Subsidiary                                 Jurisdiction
    ------------------                                 ------------

  Mykrolis Asia Ltd.                                   Delaware
    Mykrolis Singapore Pte. Ltd.                       Singapore
    Mykrolis Korea Ltd.                                Korea

  Mykrolis Pacific Ltd.                                Delaware
    Mykrolis (Shanghai) Microelectronics
       Trading Company Ltd.                            Peoples Republic of China
    Mykrolis-Anapure (Shanghai) Microelectronics
     Company Ltd.**                                    Peoples Republic of China

  Mykrolis B.V.                                        Netherlands
    Mykrolis GmbH                                      Germany
    Mykrolis (UK) Ltd.                                 United Kingdom
    Mykrolis Ireland Ltd.                              Ireland
    Mykrolis SAS                                       France
    Millipore France Holding Company B.V.***           Netherlands
      Mykrolis MiE SAS                                 France
    Nihon Mykrolis KK                                  Japan
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  **  Denotes a joint venture company of which registrant owns 80% of the voting
      equity
  *** Denotes a joint holding company of which registrant owns all of the
      class B tracking shares, representing 50% of voting equity and all of the
      capital and income interest in Mykrolis MiE SAS