alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Lock-Up Agreement  
 ________ __, _________ 

  

			
	 By Facsimile
(            )
	  	 By Facsimile ((804) 648-3404)

	Tai Shan Communications, Inc.	  	Anderson & Strudwick, Incorporated
	High-tech Zone, Taian City	  	707 East Main Street
	Xinghuo Science and Technology Park	  	20th Floor
	1366 Zhongtianmen Dajie	  	Richmond, Virginia 23219
	Shandong Province	  	Attn: L. McCarthy Downs, III,
	People’s Republic of China 271000	  	          Senior Vice President
	Attn: Gary Wang	  	
	          Chief Executive Officer	  	

  

	Re:	Lock-Up Agreement 

 Dear Mr. Wang
and Mr. Downs: 
 The undersigned understands that Anderson & Strudwick, Incorporated (the “Placement
Agent”), proposes to enter into a Placement Agreement with Tai Shan Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), providing for the public offering (the “Offering”), by the Placement Agent of a minimum of 1,666.667 common shares and
a maximum of 2,000,000 common shares (the “Shares”). 
 In consideration of the Placement
Agent’s agreement to undertake the Offering of the Shares on a “best efforts, minimum/maximum” basis, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agrees that the
undersigned will not register, offer, sell, contract to sell or grant any Shares or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for the Shares or any warrants to purchase the Shares (including, without limitation, securities of
the Company which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by the undersigned in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and securities which may be issued upon the exercise of a stock option or warrant) for
a period of (a) as to one-half ( 1/2) of the Shares now or in the future beneficially owned by the
undersigned, ninety (90) days after the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of the public offering and (b) as to the other one-half of such Shares now or in the future beneficially owned by such individual, one hundred ninety
(190) days after the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of the public offering. The obligations under this lock-up period are separate from any obligations that may relate to the Make Good Escrow Agreement to be entered between the
Placement Agent, an escrow agent, the Company and certain shareholders of the Company on the date hereof. 
 The undersigned
understands that the Company, the Placement Agent and the Representatives will proceed with the Offering in reliance upon this Lock-up Agreement. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
		
	By:	 	 
	 Name:

Its:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 2007

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 19, 2020
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofRefocus Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof  (the “Report”), Terence A. Walts,as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark A. Cox, as Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  April6, 2005

 

 
|   |   /s/  Terence A. Walts    |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   Terence A.  Walts        |
|   |   Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                 |
|   |   /s/ Mark  A. Cox         |   |
|   |   Mark A.  Cox             |
|   |   Chief  Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies each Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by Refocus Group, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Refocus Group, Inc. and willbe retained by Refocus Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Affirming LEP Access & Compliance in Federal and Federally Assisted Programs (NUREG/BR-0345)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0345 (PDF - 180.08 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**December 2008

Outreach and Compliance Coordination ProgramOffice of Small Business and Civil RightsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

The Federal Government and those receiving its assistance must take reasonable steps to ensure that persons with Limited English Proficiency. (LEP) have meaningful access to the programs, services, and information those entities provide. This requires agencies to think outside the box for creative solutions to address the needs of this ever-growing population of individuals for whom English is not the primary language. Toward that end, this brochure provides an overview of the LEP-related legal authority and obligations, defines the community of individuals who may be entitled to language assistance, identifies who must comply with the LEP requirements, and provides information about the mission and focus of the Interagency Working Group on LEP.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 23, 2023
No. 91-6138.

#### Murray *v.*Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
# m-is ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-01128-CR 

### STYLE: Ezekiel Joshua Hall v The State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed 

### DATE: January 22. 2015 Publish: No OFFENSE: Poss ofa Firearm by Felon COUNTY: Harris TRIAL COURT: 228th District Court TC CASE #:1396361

IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS


### STYLE: Ezekiel Joshua Hall v The State ofTexas CCA # 

# APPZLLA/ZT^ Petition CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: 

# K>4-/5- FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: /Qpril /&~ ZL&/ST JUDGE: /*<= PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR FOR REHEAR JUDGE: ING IN CCA IS:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Commercial Power Reactor and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update - Annual Report for Calendar Year 2010 (NUREG-1885, Revision 4)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 4 (PDF - 1.53 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2011**Date Published:** June 2011

Division of Security Operations Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D of Chapter 14 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.), as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which states, "not less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year." This is the sixth annual report, which covers calendar year 2010. In addition to information on the security response evaluation program (force-on-force inspections), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing additional information regarding the overall security performance of the commercial nuclear power industry and Category I fuel cycle facilities to keep Congress and the public informed of the NRC’s efforts to protect public health and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment through the effective regulation of the nation’s commercial nuclear power facilities and strategic special nuclear material.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Re-Evaluation of the Indoor Resuspension Factor for the Screening Analysis of the Building Occupancy Scenario for NRC's License Termination Rule - Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-1720)

This NUREG publication was issued for public comment, and the comment period is now closed.

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1720 - Draft for Comment (PDF - 2.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2002**Date Published:**June 2002

**Prepared by:**R.M. Abu-Eid, R.B. Codell, N.A. Eisenberg*  T.E. Harris, S. McGuire**

*1208 Harding Lane, Silver Spring, MD 20905 **Incident Response Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Division of Waste Management  Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the resuspension factor (RF) parameter used in the screening analysis for demonstration of compliance, using the building occupancy scenario, with the radiological criteria in the license termination rule in 10 CFR 20, Subpart E. The RF is a highly sensitive parameter impacting the inhalation dose calculation. An RF parameter value of 1.42 x 10-4 m-1 was established for screening analysis (Beyeler et al., 1999). Assuming a 10 percent fraction of loose (removable) contamination, NRC staff selected a default RF value of 1.42 x 10-5 m-1 for use in the inhalation dose calculation. Based on this RF value, and using the DandD code, the derived default concentration or surface activity screening limits for most radionuclides, particularly the alpha-emitters, were at background levels or far below the corresponding detection limits. In this study, NRC staff analyzed further literature data considering more realistic assumptions of the average member of the critical group in the building occupancy scenario and accounting for more recent actual RF field data collected for two facilities undergoing decommissioning. Based on the current analysis and re-evaluation, staff recommends using an RF value of 10-6 m-1 in the screening analysis of the inhalation dose calculation for the building occupancy scenario. The staff believes that the newly proposed RF default value is more realistic than the current value in DandD code and sufficiently conservative for screening analysis.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 13994-002]

                    a.                     *Project Name and Number:*                     Hancock Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 13994.                

                    b.                     *Date and Time of Meeting:*                     February 5, 2015; 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time (12:30 p.m. Pacific Time).                

                    c.                     *Place:*                     Telephone conference with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County (Snohomish PUD).                

                    d.                     *FERC Contact:*                     Kelly Wolcott,                     *kelly.wolcott@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-6480.                

                    e.                     *Purpose of Meeting:*                     To discuss the endangered species consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act relative to the northern spotted owl; specifically, whether Snohomish PUD's comments on the environmental assessment and the Commission's recommendation for blasting restrictions to protect the northern spotted owl require additional consultation with FWS. Discussion pertaining to this topic will be limited to Commission staff, Snohomish PUD, and FWS. Other participants may listen in and provide any germane information related to this topic.                

f. A summary of the meeting will be prepared and placed in the project's record.

                    g. All local, State, and Federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact Kelly Wolcott at                     *kelly.wolcott@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-6480 by close of business Tuesday, February 2, 2015, to RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.                

      ( print page 5106)    
Dated: January 22, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01729 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Circuit Bridging of Components by Smoke (NUREG/CR-6476, SAND96-2633)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6476 (PDF - 10.5 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 1996 **Date Published:** October 1996

**Prepared by:** T.J. Tanaka, S.P. Nowlen, D.J. Anderson Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0747 Operated by Sandia Corporation

C. Antonescu, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6051

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Smoke can adversely affect digital electronics; in the short term, it can lead to circuit bridging and in the long term to corrosion of metal parts. This report is a summary of the work to date and component-level tests by Sandia National Laboratories for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to determine the impact of smoke on digital instrumentation and control equipment. The component tests focused on short-term effects such as circuit bridging in typical components and the factors that can influence how much the smoke will affect them. These factors include the component technology and packaging, physical board protection, and environmental conditions such as the amount of smoke, temperature of burn, and humidity level. The likelihood of circuit bridging was tested by measuring leakage currents and converting those currents to resistance in ohms. Hermetically sealed ceramic packages were more resistant to smoke than plastic packages. Coating the boards with an acrylic spray provided some protection against circuit bridging. The smoke generation factors that affect the resistance the most are humidity, fuel level, and burn temperature. The use of CO2 as a fire suppressant, the presence of galvanic metal, and the presence of PVC did not significantly affect the outcome of these results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### King, Respondent, vs. De Moss and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Cadigan & Cadigan*of Superior and *Schoets, Williams & Gandrey*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Dietrich & Daley*of Superior.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson     
|Kirk A. Benson         
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 4, 2010            



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart  
|Steven G. Stewart      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2010
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsRegulatory Guides (by Division)

# NRC Regulatory Guides - Fuels and Materials Facilities (Division 3)

This page lists the number, title, publication date, and revisions for each regulatory guide in Division 3, "Fuels and Materials Facilities," with references to draft guides and related documents (where applicable).

See also Draft Regulatory Guides for Public Comment.

See NRC Regulatory Guides for more general information.

## Fuels and Materials Facilities (Division 3)

        - Guides 3.1 – 3.20
        - Guides 3.21 – 3.40
        - Guides 3.41 – 3.60
        - Guides 3.61 – 3.77

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Division 1 - Power Reactors
          - Division 2 Research and Test Reactors
          - Division 3 - Fuels and Materials Facilities
          - Division 4 - Environmental and Siting
          - Division 5 - Materials and Plant Protection
          - Division 6 - Products
          - Division 7 - Transportation
          - Division 8 - Occupational Health
          - Division 9 - Antitrust and Financial Review
          - Division 10 - General

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 3, 2024
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  May 10,  2007 | /s/ Karl Schneider                  |   |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                       | Karl Schneider                      |   |
|                       | Senior Vice President,  Finance and |   |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer             |   |

 

----