alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Alexander Nickolatos, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eco-Stim Energy Solutions, Inc. (the “registrant”); and                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: May 18, 2018 | /s/ Alexander Nickolatos
|------------------ | ------------------------
|                   | Alexander Nickolatos    
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VitaCube Systems Holdings, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanford D. Greenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/SANFORD D. GREENBERGSanford D. Greenberg
Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

March 26,
2004

---

QuickLinks
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# RASCAL 3.0: Description of Models and Methods (NUREG-1741)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1741 (PDF 4.91 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2001**Date Published:** March 2001

**Prepared by:** A. L. Sjoreena J. V. Ramsdell, Jr.b T. J. McKennac S. A. McGuired C. Fosmiree G. F. Atheyf

S. A. McGuire, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Incident Response Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Radiologic Assessment System for Consequence AnaLysis (RASCAL) 3.0 is the latest version of the RASCAL series of codes. RASCAL was developed for use by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission personnel who conduct an independent assessment of radiological accidents to prepare dose projections. It includes three sets of tools for use in consequence analysis STDose, FMDose, and DecayCalc. STDose estimates (1) source terms for radiological accidents, (2) atmospheric transport, diffusion, and deposition of effluents from the accidents, and (3) doses from exposure to the effluents. FMDose calculates doses from environmental measurements of activity in the air and on the ground. DecayCalc calculates activity of radionuclides present at a future time following decay and ingrowth. The current version of RASCAL includes computational techniques that are substantially modified from those used in the prior versions of RASCAL and significantly expands the capabilities of STDose. The major changes to STDose are (1) the inclusion of time-dependent source terms and source terms for fuel cycle and materials accidents, (2) the inclusion of radiological decay during atmospheric transport, (3) the addition of a UF6 atmospheric transport model, and (4) the ability to include meteorological data from multiple stations and the effects of terrain. The major changes to FMDose are the addition of emergency-worker guidance and derived intervention-level calculations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
---

Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Carl
E. Brechtel, P.E., do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure
regarding the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the
Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form
40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form
of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ Carl E. Brechtel                       
| | --- | -------------------------------------------
| |     | Carl E. Brechtel, P.E., SME                
| |     | President and Chief Operating
      Officer
| |     | International Tower Hill Mines
      Ltd.  

---
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Westmoore Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Matthew Jennings, CEO of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date:  September 24,
      2008
            /s/ Matthew
      JenningsMatthew Jennings,
      CEO, President,Acting Chief
      Financial Officer,Principal Executive
      Officer andPrincipal Financial
      andAccounting
      Officer







[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2019

No. 04-18-00498-CV

MWM HELOTES RANCH, LTD. and Myfe Moore,

Appellants

v.

John H. WHITE Jr., Individually; John H. White III, Individually; John H. White Jr., John H. 

White III, and Molly C. White, in their capacities as Co-Trustees of the 1983 John H. White 

Long-Term Trust F/B/O John H. White Jr., and of the 1976B Partnership Trust; TCW Helotes 

Ranch Ltd; and Tuleta White,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI11563

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

If Appellees’ brief is filed as anticipated, Appellants’ reply brief will be due on February 

26, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). Before the due date, Appellants filed an unopposed first 

motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief. 

Appellants’ motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply brief will be due on March 13, 

2019. See id. R. 38.6(d). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Bazil, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 524]

Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Brien, J.), rendered April 30,1990, convicting him of *605murder in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court (Flaherty, J.), dated March 5, 1992, which, without a hearing, denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction. By decision and order dated February 14, 1995 *(see, People v Bazil,*212 AD2d 622), this Court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on whether the defendant was present at the *Sandoval*hearing, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the intérim. The Supreme Court has now filed its report.

Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.

The testimony at the hearing established that the defendant was present at the *Sandoval*hearing. Accordingly, the defendant was not denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial *(see, People v Dokes,*79 NY2d 656).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Altman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
#### Will of Lynn: Holcombe, Claimant, Appellant, vs. Putzier and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Nelton & McGinnis*of Balsam- Lake.

For the respondents: *Henry C. Oakey*of Osceola, attorney, and *Magee & Swanson*of Ellsworth of counsel.

*By the Court.*—

Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Design of Erosion Protection for Long-Term Stabilization (NUREG-1623, Final Report)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1623 (PDF 9.59 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2002**Date Published:** September 2002

**Prepared by:** T.L. Johnson

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents a series of methods, guidelines, and procedures that are considered by the staff to be acceptable for designing erosion protection at uranium mill tailings sites in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A (Title II sites) and 40 CFR Part 192 (Title I sites). These procedures are intended to assist licensees and applicants in developing erosion protection designs that will prevent radioactive releases due to erosion. Guidance is presented for the design of soil covers, slopes and swales; sacrificial soil outslopes; and rock riprap for slopes, channels, aprons, outlets, and stream banks. Guidance is also presented for methods to determine sediment yield and for acceptable construction specifications. These recommended procedures are based upon the available literature, numerous laboratory testing programs, and extensive field experience.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Fred T. Parker *vs.*Charles F. Drake.

Waldo County.

Decided July 6, 1922.

*Arthur Ritchie,*for plaintiff.

*Buzzell & Thornton,*for defendant.

This is an action to recover the price of certain pulp wood which the plaintiff alleges that he sold and . delivered to defendant. The defendant denies that he made any contract to purchase the wood, and claims .that at plaintiff’s request he shipped the wood, with his own wood, to Oxford Paper Company subject to inspection and scale by that company; that the entire carload was rejected as not conforming to specifications, and that he received nothing for the same.

The issue was solely between the parties; no other witness testified as to the contract between them. The decision involves only a question of fact, determined largely by the weight which the jury gave to the testimony of the plaintiff and defendant. The evidence was squarely conflicting, and we perceive no reason which would justify us in interfering with the conclusion of the jury. Motion overruled.
No. 82-5997.

#### McMillion *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  William  "Buck
Shrewsbury",  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, of
the Company, does hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ William "Buck" Shrewsbury
--------------------------------
William "Buck" Shrewsbury
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2008

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TX Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       61
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134053 & (23) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TAMMY MARGERSON, f/k/a Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, TAMMY CALVIN, and WESLEY Justices MARGERSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 134053 

 COA: 275541 

Calhoun CC: 05-004462-NH 

ALLAN D. CAUDILL, M.D., and 

FAMILY SURGICAL SERVICES, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

ALBION COLLEGE STUDENT HEALTH 

SERVICES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

t0703 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 6, 2007 

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture Ltd (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry L. You, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.

                                          /S/  HARRY L. YOU
                                         --------------------------------------
                                          Harry L. You
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          Dated: October 30, 2002
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSilicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1360, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodpresented therein.

 
|   | /s/ Robert  G. Gargus    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert G.  Gargus        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | August 6,  2004          |

 

A signed original of the written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsResearch Information Letters

# Research Information Letters – 1990

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984
          - 1983
          - 1982
          - 1981
          - 1980
          - 1979
          - 1978
          - 1977
          - 1976
          - 1974
          - Contact Us About Research Information Letters

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 10, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5752-N-C-116]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, PIH, HUD.

# ACTION:

Correction of comment due date.

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 7, 2015 at (80 FR 902) in the                         **Federal Register**                        , HUD published an information collection notice entitled “30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Indian Community Development Block Grant.” The purpose of the notice is to allow an additional 30 days of public comment. HUD inadvertently published the notice asking for comments to be submitted by March 9, 2015. This notice corrects the comment due date.                    

# DATES:

*Comments Due Date:*                         February 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Colette Pollard, Reports Management Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone 202-402-3400; email at                         *Colette.Pollard@hud.gov*. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Pollard.                    

Dated: January 15, 2015.

Colette Pollard,

Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01503 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
# L_2017042EN.01004301.xml

| 18.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1357/2014 of 18 December 2014 replacing Annex III to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 365 of 19 December 2014
  )

On page 96, Annex, last paragraph after Table 9:

for:

‘Test methods:

The methods to be used are described in Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 (1) and in other relevant CEN notes or other internationally recognised test methods and guidelines.’,

read:

‘Test methods:

The methods to be used are described in Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 (1) and in other relevant CEN notes or other internationally recognised test methods and guidelines.’;

on page 96, Annex, footnote 1:

for:

‘Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ L 142, 31.5.2008, p. 1).’,

read:

‘Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ L 142, 31.5.2008, p. 1).’.

---
No. 76-5719.

#### Trantow *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.